Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2341 CWSA 01⧸02⧸24 All That Will Be Revealed In 2024. I Can't Wait

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:14.260 And I'm talking about after the Ice Age.

00:00:17.760 Anything before the Ice Age we don't know about, we're just guessing.

00:00:21.440 But since then, this has been the highlight.

00:00:24.020 If you'd like to take this up to a level that even Atlantis can't understand,

00:00:27.460 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a canteen, jug or a flask,

00:00:32.540 a vessel of any kind, filling with your favorite liquid.

00:00:36.300 I like coffee.

00:00:37.600 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine.

00:00:40.260 At the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.760 It's called the simultaneous sip and happens now.

00:00:43.600 Go.

00:00:50.060 Delightful.

00:00:52.060 Invigorating.

00:00:53.180 Refreshing.

00:00:54.480 Mmm.

00:00:54.840 Well, let's talk about all the news.

00:00:59.620 Apparently, George Soros, his house in Southampton got swatted.

00:01:05.540 So the swat was called the fake 911 thing.

00:01:09.980 And I have a few feelings about this.

00:01:13.440 Number one, I do not like this swatting business whatsoever.

00:01:18.180 It needs to stop.

00:01:19.400 My second feeling is, what the hell is wrong with me?

00:01:24.520 Seriously?

00:01:25.380 I'm not important enough to get swatted?

00:01:27.720 Oh, oh, Tim Poole can get swatted.

00:01:30.340 Marjorie Taylor Greene?

00:01:31.800 Fine.

00:01:32.620 Fine.

00:01:33.300 But do I get swatted?

00:01:34.440 No.

00:01:35.180 I have to sit here like an idiot and just say, other people got swatted.

00:01:39.720 Other people.

00:01:40.880 And nothing for me.

00:01:42.680 Nothing for me.

00:01:43.540 Do you people not know how much of a whore I am for attention? 0.98

00:01:49.900 People are getting attention all over the place.

00:01:53.420 I'm getting none.

00:01:55.260 Can we please turn some of this toward me?

00:01:58.860 That's what bothers me about this whole swatting stuff.

00:02:01.380 Well, if you're Sam Harris, you might not enjoy seeing that you're trending on the X platform,

00:02:08.240 which he no longer is a part of.

00:02:10.440 But why is Sam Harris trending?

00:02:14.320 Apparently, the entire internet, or at least the X platform, has decided that he looks like

00:02:20.160 he's mentally insane and that that explains his Trump opinions. 0.51

00:02:24.340 I can't tell you how many people have sent me the still photo of Jordan Peterson in a split

00:02:33.760 shot with Sam Harris.

00:02:36.480 And Sam Harris is, you know, looking deranged.

00:02:39.120 I'm not saying he is.

00:02:40.240 I'm just saying that the photograph makes him look deranged.

00:02:43.380 And Jordan Peterson is sort of sitting back thinking, well, we don't know what he's thinking.

00:02:50.020 But that's what people ask me.

00:02:51.360 They say, what do you think Jordan Peterson is thinking?

00:02:54.340 To which I say, if I were as smart as Jordan Peterson, I might know what he's thinking.

00:03:00.800 But if there's one thing I can warn you about, don't try to guess what people are thinking

00:03:08.260 if those people are smarter than you.

00:03:11.320 So I'm not going to try to guess what Einstein's thinking or Jordan Peterson.

00:03:18.980 Well, whatever they're thinking is probably better than whatever I'm thinking.

00:03:21.920 But, yes, if you're trending because the Internet thinks you look like you are mentally compromised,

00:03:30.700 that's not a good week for you.

00:03:33.300 And I would do what he did.

00:03:35.660 End your subscription to the platform that thinks you're mentally ill.

00:03:39.540 Now, in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with Sam Harris,

00:03:42.080 except that the Trump derangement syndrome does apparently, it looks like it broke him.

00:03:47.920 Like, joking aside, if I may, joking aside, we're not any experts on mental health, most of us.

00:03:58.780 Some of you might be.

00:04:00.480 But in all honesty, completely legitimately, it looks like there's a problem.

00:04:07.560 Like, actually, not just funny political thing to say, not just, you know, making some content for the show.

00:04:16.300 It legitimately looks like he could use a little help.

00:04:20.920 I mean, it does look like a cry for help.

00:04:23.220 And I'm actually a little concerned for him.

00:04:27.260 Literally.

00:04:28.640 Not a joke.

00:04:29.820 I'm a little bit concerned.

00:04:30.780 It kind of is starting to look like a cry for help.

00:04:36.500 So I hope that goes well anyway.

00:04:39.460 How many of you saw Green Day performing on New Year's Eve?

00:04:44.100 Did anybody catch Green Day?

00:04:50.740 I'll tell you what my first impression was when I saw it.

00:04:55.000 Yeah, I haven't seen them in a while.

00:04:56.400 I haven't seen them played live in a long time.

00:04:58.280 But when they came on stage, when I first saw them, it looked like a bunch of middle-aged dads who just left the barbecue.

00:05:09.400 And I was watching, who's the front person?

00:05:12.420 Billy Joe or something.

00:05:15.880 I was watching him, you know, bound onto the stage at the beginning of the show.

00:05:20.340 And his bounding on stage looked sort of like he had arthritis or something.

00:05:26.660 Billy Joe Armstrong.

00:05:28.280 Yeah, it was, it looked like a bunch of dads doing a cover band.

00:05:34.520 It was pretty embarrassing.

00:05:37.360 So anyway, it was funny to watch.

00:05:40.300 Apparently, the X platform will have bank payments.

00:05:46.200 Well, not bank payments, but financial payments you'll be able to do on X sometime in the middle of 2024, we expect.

00:05:52.700 But here's what I'm wondering about.

00:05:56.960 Is Elon Musk simply going to compete against other payment systems like Google Pay and Venmo?

00:06:04.920 Or is he going to try to recreate a bank?

00:06:11.880 Which would be really interesting.

00:06:13.720 In other words, could you do all of your banking on X?

00:06:16.840 If you were, let's say you didn't have complicated needs.

00:06:19.980 You know, basic banking is all you needed.

00:06:22.820 I wonder.

00:06:23.240 Do you think that there's going to be a micro lending platform?

00:06:29.460 And I wonder why we don't already have one.

00:06:32.640 Probably because of banks or something.

00:06:35.140 For example, why can't you and I give a loan to somebody on X?

00:06:42.660 And I'll say, you know what?

00:06:43.980 I don't really trust this thing, but I'll give a dollar.

00:06:46.260 I'll give a micro payment.

00:06:47.340 And then if somebody gets like, you know, a thousand views and a bunch of payments, they just launch their business.

00:06:54.560 And I'm at a dollar.

00:06:56.740 You don't think I would put one dollar on somebody who had a pretty good idea, but I don't know if it's going to work.

00:07:03.620 I mean, I'll put a dollar into it.

00:07:06.980 You know, if a million people put a dollar into it, a lot of people are going to try some new stuff.

00:07:11.500 So I don't know what kind of things, you know, Elon Musk has in mind, but I'd be a little disappointed if it's only payments.

00:07:21.020 I feel like there's a whole other level that you could take it to.

00:07:26.300 We'll see.

00:07:28.700 You should replace banks.

00:07:30.440 Banks are ridiculous.

00:07:31.340 Do you ever think about the fact that banks have a checking account, a savings account, a CD, a credit card, a loan of credit, and a mortgage for your house?

00:07:42.980 How does that make any sense?

00:07:45.780 Do you know what it should be?

00:07:48.260 You put your money in a bank, and if you've given the bank more money, you know, if you've put money in, they pay you interest.

00:07:59.580 And if you take from the bank more money than you have, then you pay them interest.

00:08:09.660 Shouldn't it be simple?

00:08:11.200 Shouldn't it be if you have my money, you give me interest.

00:08:13.720 If I have your money, I give you interest.

00:08:16.180 It shouldn't be that either.

00:08:17.360 There should be one account.

00:08:19.740 Why do you have more than one account?

00:08:22.620 Why do you have a checking account and then some kind of line of credit thing?

00:08:27.240 Shouldn't your checking account just turn into a line of credit if you spend more than you can?

00:08:33.860 And shouldn't it warn you, hey, you're spending more than you have now, but that's okay because you have credit.

00:08:40.120 Okay, you're getting close to your credit limit now.

00:08:42.200 You better slow down.

00:08:45.220 Do you know the reason that all those different products exist?

00:08:49.980 Let's just see how much you know about banking.

00:08:51.840 What is the reason so many different products exist?

00:09:00.180 Well, you're saying fees, and that's pretty good.

00:09:03.620 But is that right?

00:09:05.640 Because couldn't you just adjust, you know, if you had a simpler model, couldn't you just adjust your fees so you make the same amount of money?

00:09:13.700 And it's a simpler model.

00:09:16.820 Confusopoly is the correct answer.

00:09:18.640 It's a confusopoly.

00:09:19.660 So as long as everybody's in the business of confusing their customers, you really don't know where to take your money.

00:09:27.300 So you end up going whatever is easy or close or what your family uses or what your spouse uses.

00:09:33.540 That's about it.

00:09:34.500 Yeah.

00:09:35.220 If you were to invent banking from scratch, how much would it look like current banking?

00:09:42.980 Nothing.

00:09:44.080 Nothing.

00:09:44.600 It would be almost nothing except, you know, verifying your identity, basically, and, you know, keeping track of your money.

00:09:51.400 But basically, almost all of banking is unnecessary, unproductive, and stupid.

00:09:57.800 But because bankers have good lobbyists, they make the rules such that it's hard to get in the business.

00:10:05.040 So they don't have to compete with you as long as they can confuse you.

00:10:10.160 It's called a confusopoly.

00:10:12.380 How many of you have heard the term confusopoly?

00:10:17.740 It's in Wikipedia.

00:10:20.760 You haven't, really?

00:10:22.440 A lot of you have not heard the term?

00:10:23.700 I'm looking at your comments.

00:10:27.740 A lot of you have not heard the term a confused outlet.

00:10:30.380 So that's what a phone company is.

00:10:32.620 If you want to buy a cell phone service, are you really smart enough to know which service is going to give you a better price for the service?

00:10:42.340 Not really, because they don't price the same.

00:10:45.440 One will be minutes with some carryover.

00:10:48.060 Some will be a family plan.

00:10:49.840 One will be a year.

00:10:50.960 One will be two years.

00:10:52.040 Why do they do that?

00:10:54.940 They do that so you can't tell which one's the good one.

00:10:59.560 Now, do they have meetings where they collude and say, okay, let's be confusing?

00:11:03.880 Probably not.

00:11:05.260 But they all know that if they stay confusing, you can't compare them to the other people.

00:11:10.240 The moment you could compare a bank to its competitor or a phone company to its competitor or an insurance company to its competitor,

00:11:20.440 they would all go out of business because it would drive the competition to lower their prices to compete.

00:11:28.920 Because you could see exactly who had the better price for the service.

00:11:33.260 And the price would just keep going down until everybody goes out of business except one.

00:11:38.820 And you don't want that either.

00:11:40.280 So, yeah, it's a confusopoly.

00:11:45.580 And if you didn't know, that's a term I invented.

00:11:48.880 It's actually in the economic vocabulary now.

00:11:54.020 If you search for a confusopoly, you will find it's on Wikipedia and it's a fairly well understood concept from me.

00:12:03.320 Did I get my Nobel Prize in economics for inventing the confusopoly concept, which explains all modern pricing?

00:12:10.360 Well, we have a new study that says exercise makes you smarter.

00:12:23.720 I think we knew that.

00:12:24.980 But every time there's a new study that proves it, then it makes me feel smarter because I exercise.

00:12:31.560 Let me ask you this.

00:12:37.500 Have you noticed that there's a gigantic difference between people who get to roughly my age, you know, late 60s, and, you know, their mental decline?

00:12:48.240 You notice it, right?

00:12:50.060 It's not my imagination that you notice.

00:12:53.540 You notice.

00:12:55.040 Now, there are some people who do much better than others.

00:12:59.360 Take Ellen Dershowitz. 1.00

00:13:01.560 He's in his 80s.

00:13:03.440 And if you heard him talk, let's say, behind a curtain, you would have no idea his age.

00:13:10.460 There's no tell in the way that man talks.

00:13:13.480 He's like, how old is he?

00:13:15.220 He's like 83 or something.

00:13:16.820 How old is Dershowitz?

00:13:19.620 80, 81, something like that.

00:13:23.680 Yeah.

00:13:24.240 But imagine being 81, and if somebody heard you talk behind a curtain, they could not tell your age.

00:13:32.600 That's really impressive.

00:13:34.540 Really impressive.

00:13:35.460 Now, I don't know this, but give me a fact check if anybody knows this.

00:13:40.620 Is Dershowitz a lifelong exerciser?

00:13:43.880 Because he doesn't look like he has any body fat on him.

00:13:46.460 Does anybody know that?

00:13:49.780 I'll bet you.

00:13:51.620 Let me place a bet.

00:13:53.380 I'll bet you Dershowitz is a lifelong, moderate exerciser.

00:13:57.560 I want to see if somebody can confirm that.

00:14:01.140 Because I don't think there's any way your brain works that well at that age unless you've been a lifelong exerciser.

00:14:08.320 So I'm just going to put that out there.

00:14:10.840 Somebody says he runs?

00:14:11.800 Probably not still, but yeah.

00:14:14.540 So, I am a lifelong exerciser, and I believe that my brain works relatively well for my age.

00:14:25.320 But that's my self-assessment.

00:14:27.640 I'm going to keep exercising.

00:14:31.020 All right.

00:14:33.440 I don't know how many of you know this, but although I've been in favor of building the wall

00:14:38.440 and having tight border security since the beginning, I've always been in favor of having complete control on the border.

00:14:47.500 But, different from many of you, I had not been in favor of mass deportation.

00:14:54.820 So during Trump's first run, I said to you, don't worry about mass deportation.

00:15:00.180 It's not going to happen.

00:15:01.600 And that didn't happen.

00:15:02.340 So I didn't really get into the conversation about mass deportation because it seemed like a campaign thing,

00:15:09.340 not really a reality thing.

00:15:10.860 There were just too many of them.

00:15:12.540 You're not going to send back 25 million people who have been productive, American-like citizens for dozens of years and stuff.

00:15:20.860 It didn't seem practical.

00:15:22.680 Now, I understand the concept.

00:15:25.140 Break the law, there has to be consequence.

00:15:27.140 I get it.

00:15:27.740 I get it.

00:15:28.160 But if you weigh it against the human part and whether we can survive if they stay, which we can,

00:15:35.780 they add more than they subtract, in my opinion, over time, not right away.

00:15:40.860 But, as of today, I'd like to go on record in saying I am in favor of mass deportation.

00:15:48.060 I want you to hear that as clearly as possible.

00:15:50.440 So I'm reversing my long-held opinion that we don't need to send people back because we don't have too many.

00:15:59.320 That's what I used to think.

00:16:00.360 We don't have too many.

00:16:02.200 And also, I'm going to remind you again the reasoning.

00:16:05.460 When America takes on people from Mexico and Central America, we are more often than not,

00:16:13.480 you know, there's always going to be a criminal element that's in any population.

00:16:17.380 But more often than not, we're getting people who are more American than Americans.

00:16:21.640 Yeah, I said it.

00:16:22.900 I'm going to say it again.

00:16:24.140 We're getting people who are more American than Americans.

00:16:28.400 If you look at what makes an American, American, right? 0.67

00:16:32.080 You know, if you look at the traditional values, right, you know, I'm not saying they're good or bad.

00:16:37.740 But if you look at traditional values, good or bad, they tend to be religious, hardworking, family-oriented.

00:16:45.580 And they tend to be really good citizens pretty quickly.

00:16:51.260 They tend to integrate.

00:16:53.040 They learn the language.

00:16:54.120 Their second generation are awesome.

00:16:56.400 They're hard workers.

00:16:57.520 They've taken a risk to get here.

00:16:59.160 They really wanted to be here.

00:17:00.560 I mean, they really put in some effort to be here.

00:17:04.820 Now, like every conversation in the world, am I referring to every single person in the immigrant community?

00:17:13.720 No.

00:17:14.860 No.

00:17:15.940 Do I think that if you could snap your fingers and send people back, would I be in favor of it?

00:17:22.280 I don't know.

00:17:22.740 Maybe.

00:17:23.640 Maybe that would be a different conversation if it were practical.

00:17:26.920 But if it's not practical, and they're good Americans, and they have a good history of, you know, assimilation, well, it's not the biggest problem in my list of problems.

00:17:39.400 However, we now have a completely different situation.

00:17:42.640 We now have a situation where there's some kind of organized, well-funded, destroy America system in place in which the immigrants are coming from all over the world, and they're not coming from Central America and from Mexico primarily. 0.96

00:18:00.980 They're coming from Middle East, China, Africa, everywhere else.

00:18:09.480 Now, that system will destroy America if it's allowed to persist. 0.99

00:18:14.440 Apparently, we don't have any legal recourse for stopping this process because it's all legal.

00:18:21.560 Nobody's doing anything illegal.

00:18:23.260 They're just making it really easy for the immigrants to come here. 0.99

00:18:26.160 The only way to break that system, short of assassinating the people involved, which would be illegal, would be to make sure it doesn't pay.

00:18:34.360 So you'd have to start shipping back everybody who came from outside the hemisphere. 1.00

00:18:42.080 So when I say I'm in favor of mass deportation, I mean starting with people who didn't walk here, right? 1.00

00:18:52.020 If you had to get on a boat or a plane to get into our country, you're fucking going home.

00:18:58.860 If you walked, and I'll include the train and Mexico and stuff, if you walked, maybe you need to go home too, but last, last, right?

00:19:12.280 I would take care of everybody who came over the water or in a plane.

00:19:17.880 If they came from somewhere outside the Americas, every one of them, send back every one of them, 100%. 1.00

00:19:25.340 I don't care what it costs at any expense and any inconvenience at any price.

00:19:32.480 They all have to go back.

00:19:35.220 Now, the reason I'm not making such a big deal about Mexican immigration is apparently it's not that high.

00:19:42.340 It's not that high.

00:19:44.820 The Mexican immigration is not the biggest problem in the world.

00:19:48.620 And I don't know if you've paid attention, but there are a whole bunch of things happening in Mexico right now.

00:19:54.420 That would suggest their economy is getting ready to surge.

00:19:59.080 The Mexican economy has a bunch of good stuff happening.

00:20:02.180 They got this big train thing that's going to be good for everything.

00:20:06.920 We got stuff moving.

00:20:08.280 You know, manufacturing is moving in.

00:20:11.740 It's kind of a positive economic situation in Mexico, more so than ever before.

00:20:16.520 Oh, I have confirmation that Dershowitz is a workout guy.

00:20:24.020 I'll tell you.

00:20:25.100 If you see that people smoke cigarettes all their life and get cancer, lung cancer, it's probably good science.

00:20:31.760 If you see the science that people who exercise have fitter brains, and then every time you see a Dershowitz, you can predict whether they exercise.

00:20:42.220 I mean, just think about that.

00:20:43.560 I had no idea if Dershowitz exercises.

00:20:47.280 But just based on his brain and his age, I presumed he was a regular exerciser.

00:20:53.760 And sure enough, it's confirmed.

00:20:55.920 That's not an accident.

00:20:56.980 All right.

00:21:00.140 So mass deportation, I'm all for it. 1.00

00:21:03.220 And I think it's funny because the Atlantic is trying to scare the public that Trump is in favor of mass deportation.

00:21:11.400 In the first election, that was actually a pretty good attack.

00:21:16.360 Because even, you know, I was pro-Trump in the first, you know, 2016.

00:21:20.480 I was pro-Trump, and I didn't want to see mass deportation.

00:21:25.040 It seemed too hard.

00:21:26.980 But now it just makes sense.

00:21:29.200 Now it makes complete sense.

00:21:31.700 In fact, it's a no-brainer.

00:21:33.720 Now, I don't know how many people you could actually mass deport, but you should try really hard.

00:21:39.820 We should try really hard to deport every single person who flew or took a boat. 1.00

00:21:45.280 And we should shut that down right away.

00:21:48.300 Make it not pay.

00:21:49.440 All right.

00:21:50.440 All right.

00:21:51.520 So there's an influential American psychologist he's called, Martin Seligman.

00:21:59.720 He's in his 80s, and he found out recently that his people who know him and have worked with him had created a bot, an AI entity, based on all of his writings.

00:22:13.120 So they had apparently recreated him.

00:22:18.540 And when he tested it out, he actually thought, you know, actually, it gives pretty good advice.

00:22:24.080 So they've actually created an advice-giving entity that's based on a real person's writing.

00:22:30.800 And, of course, now they can make it photorealistic, and they can match the voice.

00:22:36.940 So I asked the following question.

00:22:40.160 Can a Scott bot be far behind?

00:22:42.860 Now, unlike most of you, I have a huge body of public work.

00:22:51.100 So if you're an author or if you're an American psychologist who wrote a lot, it should not be hard for a Scott bot to completely absorb my personality.

00:23:03.300 Because if you've got how many hours of live streaming do I do?

00:23:08.900 At least two hours a day.

00:23:13.300 So I'm up to like, you know, 800 hours a year times, what, five years?

00:23:19.380 And that's just live stream.

00:23:21.260 Then you add all the interviews that are on the Internet.

00:23:24.080 You add all of my books, all of my cartoons.

00:23:28.540 The cartoons don't exactly talk to my personality as much as my sense of humor, I guess.

00:23:33.840 The only thing that the Scott bot could not do is sense of humor.

00:23:43.720 So AI seems to be good on look and sound and grammar, but it's not good on sense of humor, and it's not good on, you know, not hallucinating yet.

00:23:57.520 Now, Brian Romelli promises us that sometime this year we'll have access to something he's working on, which would be a personal AI.

00:24:10.960 So you'd have your own AI agent.

00:24:12.960 Now, I'll tell you again that here's how the world will go.

00:24:16.080 Guarantee it.

00:24:17.960 This is the safest prediction you could ever make.

00:24:22.380 It seems unlikely to me that each person will have to go find their own AI app every time they want to do something.

00:24:32.780 We're going to have our own personal AI that nobody can touch, and that's the only thing that should interact with the other AIs.

00:24:41.420 So you won't interact directly with some other AI app.

00:24:45.620 You'll talk to your own, and it will figure out which app it needs to deal with to get you what you need.

00:24:50.940 Because it's going to be too hard to keep track of all the apps and what they can do and compare them.

00:24:57.860 It's going to be a confusedopoly.

00:25:00.040 Oh, here we go.

00:25:02.040 AI is already a confusedopoly.

00:25:06.180 Do you know why somebody would buy ChatGPT subscription instead of, let's say, you know, Bing?

00:25:15.360 Because they don't know the difference.

00:25:16.880 You're going to have a million apps that look like they're sort of the same, but they will price things differently, so you don't know which one's the good one.

00:25:25.960 So you're probably going to need your AI just to sort it through the AI confusopoly to figure out which ones to use at the right price.

00:25:33.860 Some will have term limits.

00:25:35.940 Right.

00:25:36.260 Some will have usage limits.

00:25:38.420 Some will have too much censorship.

00:25:40.700 So it will be impossible for you to sort out which app to use, and that will be intentional.

00:25:48.460 Well, you probably knew this, but the U.S. military finished their study of all the white supremacists and extremists in the military,

00:25:56.320 and they found extremists in the military, the white supremacists, they found, they didn't find any, there weren't any.

00:26:08.600 No, it wasn't zero, but it was something that looked like the rest of the public, right?

00:26:14.000 So there were some, there were actually some acts of extremism, but they were somewhat trivial in their numbers.

00:26:20.560 So, why was the military even looking?

00:26:27.200 Do you think that the generals believed there was a problem, or do you think it was always an op,

00:26:35.400 so that as long as they were looking for the problem and said there was a problem, it would put a cloud over Trump?

00:26:43.480 That was all just to put a cloud over a MAGA and Trump, right?

00:26:47.280 So that was an op, wouldn't you say?

00:26:51.320 But was it ever, do you think there was ever any chance that was real?

00:26:55.460 And that they just really, they were worried, and they really needed to find out?

00:26:59.540 Probably not.

00:27:00.600 It was probably exactly what it looked like.

00:27:02.260 It was a political op, that as long as they were talking about it, it was good for their team.

00:27:09.720 So, yes, our military is political.

00:27:14.140 Great, great.

00:27:16.300 Wouldn't it be good if they were just trying to protect us?

00:27:18.260 But no, they mostly want to see generals in dresses.

00:27:24.860 They want to see most of our leadership wearing dresses, because, you know, that scares China and Russia.

00:27:34.500 Look at our generals.

00:27:36.140 They look so good in dresses.

00:27:37.200 All right.

00:27:41.000 And yes, that's a sexist statement.

00:27:44.140 But when you talk, oh, let me explain this again in case anybody isn't new to me.

00:27:49.320 I'm completely opposed to any form of discrimination against individuals in employment, renting, loans, personal life, marriage, anything, anything individual.

00:28:06.100 Don't do any discriminating.

00:28:08.160 Don't discriminate on race or gender or, you know, sex or anything.

00:28:12.360 But there is an exception where you can discriminate all you want.

00:28:19.860 Did you know that?

00:28:21.860 Yeah.

00:28:22.480 Defense.

00:28:23.440 Your personal defense, you can discriminate as much as you want.

00:28:26.900 If somebody says, why did you punch that guy who was wearing a hat?

00:28:31.160 And you say, the last 10 people who wore a hat mugged me.

00:28:37.280 Okay.

00:28:38.380 Now, is it up to me to tell you that you acted incorrectly?

00:28:41.660 Well, maybe if you violated the law, the law has to get involved.

00:28:45.680 But do I think that you made a mistake by punching the 11th person who wore a hat if the first 10 people with hats punched you?

00:28:53.140 I do not.

00:28:53.800 To me, that seems like a quite reasonable self-defense stance, and I would not question it.

00:28:59.540 It might be illegal, and the law would have to deal with that.

00:29:03.020 But I'm not going to question it logically, ethically, or morally, because nobody gets to make the decision but you.

00:29:10.520 I don't get to make your personal defense decisions.

00:29:14.540 If somebody is an intruder in your house, are you going to call me and say,

00:29:19.060 Scott, there's an intruder in my house.

00:29:20.820 Should I shoot them?

00:29:22.280 It's not up to me.

00:29:23.800 Only you can make that decision.

00:29:26.000 And you know what?

00:29:26.580 You can use anything you want.

00:29:28.540 You can use anything you want.

00:29:31.120 You could use your biases.

00:29:34.840 Absolutely.

00:29:36.100 Yeah.

00:29:36.620 If there's somebody in your house, a home invader, you can use any bias you want.

00:29:43.880 Any bias you want.

00:29:45.280 It's not illegal.

00:29:46.400 It's not immoral.

00:29:47.220 It's not inethical.

00:29:48.940 Because it's self-defense.

00:29:49.980 Likewise, national defense discriminates like crazy.

00:29:56.040 Right?

00:29:56.500 Does anybody complain that our pilots have to have good eyesight?

00:30:02.560 Does anybody complain that our soldiers need to have legs that work?

00:30:09.880 Nobody complains.

00:30:11.300 Because when it comes to defense, you don't fuck around.

00:30:15.300 You do what works.

00:30:17.840 End of story.

00:30:19.720 End of story.

00:30:20.440 So, yes, you can discriminate all you want in the military.

00:30:27.420 But maybe they should get back to that instead of looking for bad MAGA people in the ranks.

00:30:32.660 So, according to a professor at Georgetown University, who used to be in the CIA, he was a CIA analyst, Dr. John Gentry, he says he believes that the intel agencies are going to try to interfere in the 2024 election.

00:30:58.280 So, he's an actual ex-CIA guy who is credible enough to be a Georgetown University professor, and he thinks it's somewhat obvious that they're going to interfere with the election.

00:31:12.160 Now, of course, he points to the famous Hunter laptop thing as an example.

00:31:19.600 And he says that the intel agencies have been compromised by politics.

00:31:24.220 But here's what he says is the reason.

00:31:26.120 He said the old standard of not getting involved in politics was largely gone.

00:31:32.900 And he pointed to two main reasons.

00:31:35.560 Former CIA director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper.

00:31:42.740 Now, is there anybody who watches television or follows the news who doesn't know that those two gentlemen have a lot of questions to answer?

00:31:52.500 Is there anybody who didn't know that there's something about those two?

00:31:58.280 There's something about them that you need to know.

00:32:00.840 I don't know what it is, but there's something about them you need to know.

00:32:07.560 And he blames them for bringing in DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, and policy actions that basically made it political.

00:32:17.260 So, apparently, if you hire people for their DEI characteristics, you might get more people who are political.

00:32:28.220 I don't know if that's directly connected, but that seems to be what he's suggesting.

00:32:33.340 And he now thinks that political activism is common.

00:32:39.720 So, we now have a number of people saying that they think our own intelligence agencies will assassinate Trump or attempt to.

00:32:52.660 So, the people saying that directly are Vivek Ramaswamy running for president and telling you that one of the candidates is likely to be assassinated.

00:33:05.260 Not just maybe, but likely, before it even happens.

00:33:12.260 Now, we're also seeing Steve Bannon say it.

00:33:14.400 I think Jack Posobiec said it.

00:33:16.720 I think Sernovich has hinted at that as well.

00:33:19.440 I say it directly as well.

00:33:21.620 How many people, Tucker, Tucker Carlson says it directly.

00:33:28.340 RFK Jr., I think he's saying it directly.

00:33:30.960 Is he not?

00:33:34.420 Now, have we ever, Don Bongino is saying it directly.

00:33:38.800 Alex Jones is saying it directly.

00:33:41.820 I'm looking at some names going by as you're suggesting them.

00:33:45.140 Have you ever seen a situation like this before?

00:33:48.980 This is pretty unprecedented, isn't it?

00:33:50.980 Do you know that it's possible that the only thing keeping Trump alive is us?

00:34:00.200 Literally us.

00:34:01.640 And when I say us, I mean the people who are independent enough that they can say out loud in public, in front of all of you,

00:34:10.500 it looks like they're going to try to kill him.

00:34:13.980 Because they've created a situation where they've talked themselves into being evil enough that that makes sense.

00:34:20.260 I feel like it's our collective understanding of this risk and our willingness to say it out loud and look crazy.

00:34:34.480 This is not easy to say it out loud.

00:34:36.380 You do look a little like you're close to the edge there.

00:34:39.380 But I don't think it looks crazy at all.

00:34:42.460 I think that it looks obvious.

00:34:45.740 You know, and Tucker does the best job of explaining it.

00:34:49.100 You know, once they don't beat you in the vote and they don't beat you in the impeachment and they can't beat you in putting you in jail,

00:34:56.160 there aren't options.

00:34:58.860 What's left?

00:34:59.520 And I don't think that we, you know, can say it's never happened in American history.

00:35:06.140 Because there's a strong suggestion that JFK was not what it looked like.

00:35:12.100 So, honestly, I think we're keeping Trump alive.

00:35:17.280 We being people who are willing to say this out loud.

00:35:20.400 Because if it happens, God forbid, but if it happens,

00:35:25.320 then nobody will be surprised at the response.

00:35:31.900 I don't know what it would be.

00:35:32.980 But whatever it is, it's going to be big.

00:35:36.740 And I'll tell you one thing.

00:35:39.420 If Trump goes down,

00:35:42.460 you're going to get something just as aggressive.

00:35:47.300 The one thing that the Republicans are doing well,

00:35:51.760 with the exception of Nikki Haley,

00:35:53.360 is that they're suggesting that there's something behind Trump that could be as interesting as Trump.

00:35:59.800 You know, certainly be vague.

00:36:02.120 All right.

00:36:04.520 In my opinion,

00:36:05.720 the biggest existential risk to the United States is the DEI.

00:36:10.700 Now,

00:36:11.340 I'm not saying that with like a clever political hyperbole.

00:36:16.680 I actually think that's true.

00:36:18.660 Like literally,

00:36:21.760 scientifically,

00:36:23.980 you know,

00:36:24.400 objectively,

00:36:26.160 and somewhat obviously.

00:36:28.480 Because DEI is the only thing that can break everything.

00:36:33.420 Everything else that could go wrong,

00:36:36.460 at least we have everything else that's still working to fix it.

00:36:41.000 You know what I mean?

00:36:42.520 Like if we had a tech,

00:36:43.520 not let's take the year 2000 bug.

00:36:46.840 The year 2000 bug was something that was broken.

00:36:49.740 You know,

00:36:49.880 we thought the computers were going to stop working because they couldn't handle the year 2000.

00:36:54.740 But because our technology industry was so robust and healthy,

00:37:00.040 it fixed it.

00:37:02.240 Right.

00:37:02.660 So there are things that we can do wrong,

00:37:05.580 but because our military is good,

00:37:08.000 then we got away with it.

00:37:09.800 Right.

00:37:10.400 So there's a whole bunch of situations where you can make,

00:37:13.600 you know,

00:37:13.820 have a big problem in some part of your larger system,

00:37:17.300 but you can fix it.

00:37:19.140 There's the rest of the stuff still working.

00:37:21.560 So the rest of the stuff figures out how to fix the stuff that's broken.

00:37:25.160 But DEI is different.

00:37:26.480 DEI by its nature guarantees that you're looking for a small pool of candidates to add to your

00:37:36.540 diversity.

00:37:37.760 And simply because the numbers are small,

00:37:40.460 you're going to end up going further down in the quality list in order to get your number.

00:37:45.920 So necessarily,

00:37:47.660 even if you assume that every person was equal quality in the world,

00:37:52.220 you know,

00:37:52.340 every demographic group,

00:37:53.700 if you even start with that assumption,

00:37:55.720 it still destroys the world.

00:37:57.960 This is an important point.

00:38:00.040 If you start with the assumption that all the ethnicities and genders are equal capability,

00:38:07.020 equal potential,

00:38:08.300 if you start with that and you operate on that assumption and try to get equal numbers of them,

00:38:14.000 that will destroy the world.

00:38:16.220 It's guaranteed.

00:38:17.980 If you were an engineer and somebody said,

00:38:20.460 I'm going to design a system and they take all the politics out,

00:38:23.700 and they just described it like a machine,

00:38:26.500 an engineer would say,

00:38:27.620 well,

00:38:27.820 obviously that's not the word.

00:38:30.720 It's only because it's political that we even think it makes any sense at all.

00:38:36.340 Right?

00:38:36.860 It doesn't make sense logically,

00:38:40.100 engineering wise,

00:38:41.340 physics wise,

00:38:42.620 doesn't make sense in terms of math.

00:38:46.940 There's literally no argument for it,

00:38:49.120 except that it's how people feel and what they want to feel.

00:38:52.960 So DEI can destroy and is literally every part of the country.

00:39:00.960 So you can see it's the claim here is that DEI from this professor,

00:39:07.760 Professor Gentry,

00:39:10.660 he would claim that DEI is ruining the intelligence people.

00:39:14.980 We just talked about the military wasting energy looking for white supremacists that they couldn't find.

00:39:25.540 Why does that happen?

00:39:27.220 DEI.

00:39:28.540 It's all part of the same philosophy.

00:39:30.500 Why is it that the system is more divided racially?

00:39:34.740 DEI.

00:39:35.800 Why are our corporations no longer as capable?

00:39:38.980 DEI.

00:39:39.620 Why is it that every time you go to get any simple thing done,

00:39:44.480 just accomplish any simple thing that involves another person helping you,

00:39:48.920 you can't get it done.

00:39:50.500 There's like a massive incompetence problem in the country.

00:39:53.840 Again,

00:39:54.880 not related to race or religion or gender.

00:39:58.100 If that's what you're hearing,

00:40:00.820 you're missing the whole point.

00:40:03.300 This would be a problem if everybody had exactly same average capability.

00:40:08.400 You'd get the same problem.

00:40:10.160 It's just you're trying too hard to force a square peg into a round hole in a short time frame,

00:40:16.600 and it can only go one way.

00:40:18.580 So until we can say that out loud,

00:40:23.100 there's no hope of fixing it.

00:40:25.480 But I do think that 2024 will be the year.

00:40:30.200 It will be the year that we can say that out loud,

00:40:33.300 and then there can be some changes.

00:40:35.920 Certainly,

00:40:36.600 Harvard has destroyed its entire reputation with DEI.

00:40:41.160 So the colleges are worthless.

00:40:42.920 The military is degraded.

00:40:44.440 Our intelligence is bad.

00:40:46.100 Intelligence departments.

00:40:47.000 And our government,

00:40:48.620 of course,

00:40:49.000 is a basket case.

00:40:50.720 And our corporations are less competitive.

00:40:54.460 And then throw on top of that climate change and whatever regulations that causes.

00:41:00.980 Yeah,

00:41:01.440 we're basically doing it to ourselves.

00:41:03.680 It's self-inflicted.

00:41:07.580 Here are some fun things we could find out in 2024.

00:41:12.540 There's some indication there might be some Epstein flight logs,

00:41:16.840 those released that would be different than the ones you've seen.

00:41:20.040 There are a bunch of fake ones and old ones going around.

00:41:23.500 Ignore those.

00:41:24.300 I don't know what's real yet.

00:41:25.720 But ignore the fake Epstein lists.

00:41:29.000 Don't believe anything you see about an Epstein list unless you see it on the major news.

00:41:33.740 If you see it only on social media.

00:41:41.860 Um...

00:41:42.220 Umberto Eco and John Cialdini send their love.

00:41:46.200 Don't know what that means.

00:41:49.840 Anyway,

00:41:50.360 here's some things we might find out.

00:41:51.740 We might find out more about Epstein,

00:41:53.540 but I doubt it.

00:41:55.040 Because obviously that's been buried pretty hard.

00:41:58.240 Um...

00:41:59.040 At this point,

00:42:00.560 here are the things we can say about Epstein.

00:42:02.820 There's no doubt whatsoever he was murdered.

00:42:05.860 There's no doubt whatsoever our government had some involvement.

00:42:09.960 Maybe other governments,

00:42:11.340 but certainly ours.

00:42:12.580 And there's no doubt whatsoever

00:42:14.280 that it was to cover up

00:42:16.360 for the powerful people that were being blackmailed.

00:42:20.100 There's no doubt at all.

00:42:21.860 Does anybody have any doubt

00:42:23.540 about what happened with the Epstein situation?

00:42:26.320 We're way past

00:42:28.460 any questions about that,

00:42:29.960 are we?

00:42:30.900 It's exactly what it looks like.

00:42:34.120 It's exactly what it looks like.

00:42:37.200 Yeah.

00:42:37.940 And do you think Bill Barr is dirty?

00:42:42.680 Because Bill Barr was the one who

00:42:44.400 essentially put the stamp of approval

00:42:47.760 on the suicide narrative.

00:42:53.360 It looks like it.

00:42:55.220 Yeah.

00:42:55.380 I mean,

00:42:56.360 it would take some investigation to know,

00:42:59.760 but on the surface,

00:43:00.860 it looks like he is compromised.

00:43:03.520 Or that he did it.

00:43:04.680 Now, let me give you the positive version.

00:43:07.520 The positive version is that

00:43:09.200 he knew it would destroy the world

00:43:11.340 if we found Bill.

00:43:13.720 So there is a possibility

00:43:15.500 that he's saving the world.

00:43:17.380 You know that, right?

00:43:19.020 It's not your choice.

00:43:20.140 It's not your first choice

00:43:21.160 because you'd rather know.

00:43:22.720 And you'd rather let the cards fall

00:43:24.620 where they fall.

00:43:25.240 But if you're in his position

00:43:26.960 and you knew that releasing this

00:43:30.120 could actually

00:43:30.820 destroy the world order,

00:43:34.420 which it might,

00:43:36.700 you know,

00:43:36.880 it could destroy,

00:43:37.760 let's say,

00:43:39.080 alliances.

00:43:41.020 It could destroy marriages. 0.98

00:43:42.720 It could destroy the effectiveness

00:43:43.780 of leaders.

00:43:45.420 It could destroy a lot.

00:43:46.680 Do you think there's any chance

00:43:49.900 that Bannon's,

00:43:50.960 I'm sorry,

00:43:51.960 that Barr,

00:43:52.980 do you think there's any chance

00:43:53.940 that Barr said,

00:43:54.620 you know what,

00:43:55.740 I hate everything about this Epstein thing.

00:43:58.000 He's guilty as hell.

00:43:59.580 There was definitely a lot of blackmail,

00:44:01.740 but I got to cover this shit up

00:44:03.280 because the world isn't ready for this.

00:44:06.180 What do you think?

00:44:06.700 So I'm going to say

00:44:09.500 this is my working assumption.

00:44:12.000 My working assumption

00:44:13.100 is that Barr covered it up,

00:44:15.420 but I'm going to be open-minded

00:44:17.400 as to why.

00:44:20.760 Your assumption is

00:44:22.180 it's for a bad reason.

00:44:23.720 It might be.

00:44:25.000 Certainly,

00:44:25.860 that's the first thing you think.

00:44:28.100 But

00:44:28.320 put yourself in this position.

00:44:31.900 Would you necessarily

00:44:33.220 destroy the country

00:44:35.820 to just know the truth?

00:44:40.540 I don't know.

00:44:41.820 Don't know.

00:44:43.760 So I'm going to say

00:44:44.600 that I think Barr

00:44:46.040 is a more interesting character

00:44:47.520 because he's not

00:44:49.560 immune to patriotism.

00:44:52.300 He is not immune to patriotism.

00:44:54.760 I don't know what else he is,

00:44:55.800 but I don't think

00:44:56.860 he's immune to patriotism.

00:44:58.700 So

00:44:58.940 I'm going to give him

00:45:00.860 at least that possibility.

00:45:03.700 Here are some things

00:45:04.400 we might,

00:45:04.940 just think about the things

00:45:05.860 we might find out

00:45:06.900 in 2024.

00:45:08.640 Now,

00:45:09.080 I'm not going to bet

00:45:09.720 that any of these

00:45:10.380 will happen,

00:45:11.640 but we might.

00:45:12.740 We might find out

00:45:13.780 some surprises

00:45:14.500 about the 2020 election.

00:45:17.460 Or at the very least,

00:45:19.080 we'll find out

00:45:20.260 there are no surprises

00:45:21.180 because there are

00:45:21.920 some specific things

00:45:23.060 that people are

00:45:23.720 tracking down

00:45:24.900 that look

00:45:25.340 look kind of interesting.

00:45:28.120 I don't want

00:45:28.820 to say cracking.

00:45:30.160 They do look interesting.

00:45:32.880 I think we'll find out

00:45:34.320 a lot more

00:45:35.000 about the trials

00:45:36.400 against Trump

00:45:37.160 and how fake they are.

00:45:39.200 So,

00:45:39.840 we're talking about

00:45:41.180 a month from now

00:45:42.020 we might get

00:45:42.660 some kind of an answer

00:45:43.740 about whether

00:45:44.820 Trump's businesses

00:45:45.840 will be taken from him

00:45:47.240 or his alleged

00:45:48.800 illegal activities.

00:45:50.740 But just hold this

00:45:51.680 in mind.

00:45:52.100 the illegal activity

00:45:54.240 in mind

00:45:54.880 was that

00:45:55.580 he overvalued

00:45:57.100 his properties

00:45:57.920 when he dealt

00:45:58.860 with Deutsche Bank.

00:46:00.440 The Deutsche Bank

00:46:01.340 leaders

00:46:03.560 who testified

00:46:05.520 said that

00:46:06.900 they don't pay

00:46:07.560 attention

00:46:08.000 to the client's

00:46:09.980 estimates.

00:46:10.880 They do their own

00:46:11.640 and that they

00:46:13.800 liked doing business

00:46:14.840 with them

00:46:15.260 and they would do

00:46:15.860 business with them

00:46:16.580 again

00:46:16.860 and they lost

00:46:17.540 no money.

00:46:18.020 Now,

00:46:21.320 have you ever

00:46:21.740 seen anybody

00:46:22.240 go to jail

00:46:22.940 when the victim,

00:46:25.200 the victim

00:46:26.640 says under oath

00:46:28.640 there was no crime?

00:46:31.580 They didn't say

00:46:32.500 that they weren't hurt.

00:46:33.900 They said

00:46:34.300 there was no crime

00:46:35.160 and they're the victim.

00:46:38.820 How in the world

00:46:40.320 does that trial

00:46:42.500 complete

00:46:43.220 when the victim

00:46:45.720 said the crime

00:46:47.140 didn't happen?

00:46:48.020 the fucking

00:46:49.160 victim

00:46:49.760 under oath

00:46:51.340 under oath

00:46:53.200 said the crime

00:46:54.500 didn't happen.

00:46:55.580 Not only did they say

00:46:56.920 the crime didn't happen,

00:46:58.100 they explained

00:46:59.180 completely credibly

00:47:00.640 same thing I told you

00:47:02.300 before they did

00:47:03.040 that it is

00:47:04.360 bank procedure

00:47:05.300 to not pay attention

00:47:07.100 to the customer's

00:47:08.140 estimates

00:47:08.680 because they can

00:47:09.820 never be trusted.

00:47:11.000 So it's not

00:47:11.920 illegal to have

00:47:12.960 a high estimate

00:47:13.920 and give it to a bank

00:47:15.280 because they don't

00:47:16.360 even pay attention

00:47:17.060 to it.

00:47:17.580 they do their own

00:47:19.480 and that's what

00:47:20.680 the bank said

00:47:21.400 and I told you

00:47:22.100 the bank would say

00:47:22.860 that months

00:47:24.000 before they did.

00:47:24.700 now what is the country

00:47:29.600 going to do

00:47:30.280 if Trump

00:47:31.960 is found guilty?

00:47:33.440 Well actually

00:47:34.000 I think he's already

00:47:34.740 found guilty, right?

00:47:36.100 Didn't the judge

00:47:36.740 already rule

00:47:37.420 that he did

00:47:38.540 in fact

00:47:39.060 inflate his asset?

00:47:40.660 Yeah, he's already

00:47:41.120 guilty.

00:47:42.020 So the only decision

00:47:43.040 is what they're going

00:47:43.660 to do about it.

00:47:45.220 Right?

00:47:46.700 What they're going

00:47:47.400 to do about it.

00:47:48.160 And one of the

00:47:49.420 possibilities

00:47:49.940 they would take

00:47:50.580 his business

00:47:51.120 is away from

00:47:51.960 his control

00:47:52.680 in America.

00:47:55.900 In America.

00:47:57.740 So he runs

00:47:58.840 for public office

00:47:59.840 and then he would

00:48:01.180 lose his entire

00:48:02.120 empire

00:48:04.220 or at least

00:48:05.220 the control of it.

00:48:06.160 You'd still have

00:48:06.620 the financial interest.

00:48:08.100 But he'd lose

00:48:08.580 control of it

00:48:09.560 for purely politics.

00:48:12.160 This would be

00:48:14.720 such an injustice.

00:48:20.580 I mean

00:48:21.360 I think Jack Smith

00:48:22.280 would have to

00:48:22.780 increase his security

00:48:23.820 quite a bit

00:48:24.580 if this happens.

00:48:27.160 Because there's

00:48:27.920 nobody who's going

00:48:28.580 to see this

00:48:29.140 as an act of justice

00:48:30.340 if he gets convicted.

00:48:32.600 Well anybody

00:48:33.300 who understands

00:48:34.040 the issue

00:48:34.860 would know

00:48:35.980 it's not justice.

00:48:37.620 So

00:48:38.020 powder keg.

00:48:40.320 We'll see what happens.

00:48:41.220 How about

00:48:42.400 Ukraine money laundering?

00:48:44.080 Do you think

00:48:44.220 we'll find out

00:48:44.740 more about that?

00:48:45.780 Maybe.

00:48:46.980 Do you think

00:48:47.360 we'll find out

00:48:47.960 who is bribing

00:48:48.700 Congress

00:48:49.160 on the asylum

00:48:50.000 question

00:48:50.480 or the TikTok

00:48:51.600 question?

00:48:53.900 Wouldn't you

00:48:54.540 like to have

00:48:54.940 a list of people

00:48:55.720 who are

00:48:56.340 not in favor

00:48:57.620 of changing

00:48:58.340 the asylum process?

00:49:00.400 The asylum

00:49:01.320 process

00:49:01.800 is why

00:49:02.680 Majorca

00:49:03.700 and Biden

00:49:04.280 can say

00:49:04.960 they're doing

00:49:05.340 a good job.

00:49:06.440 Because they're

00:49:07.080 following the law.

00:49:08.500 As long as

00:49:09.360 the people

00:49:09.660 apply for asylum

00:49:10.560 we have to

00:49:11.680 process them

00:49:12.460 as if they're

00:49:13.380 legally in the system.

00:49:15.880 Why don't we

00:49:16.540 change the

00:49:17.060 asylum process?

00:49:18.800 Does anybody

00:49:19.440 know the answer

00:49:20.120 to that?

00:49:21.220 I don't.

00:49:22.880 I have no idea.

00:49:24.420 The only

00:49:24.840 working

00:49:25.800 assumption

00:49:26.700 I have

00:49:27.140 is

00:49:27.380 massive

00:49:28.280 corruption.

00:49:29.620 The only

00:49:30.460 explanation

00:49:31.200 is that

00:49:31.960 Congress

00:49:32.400 has bought

00:49:32.900 off.

00:49:34.580 Let me ask

00:49:35.720 this.

00:49:36.240 Do you

00:49:36.420 think if

00:49:36.760 you did

00:49:37.040 a poll

00:49:37.380 of the

00:49:37.640 public

00:49:38.040 in any

00:49:39.260 state

00:49:39.840 you said

00:49:42.220 asylum is

00:49:43.080 the reason

00:49:43.480 that we

00:49:44.180 have this

00:49:44.500 massive

00:49:44.880 immigration

00:49:45.560 problem?

00:49:46.820 Do you

00:49:47.040 think we

00:49:47.380 should

00:49:47.640 relook at

00:49:48.220 the asylum

00:49:48.740 laws?

00:49:49.680 What do

00:49:49.940 you think

00:49:50.180 an American

00:49:50.700 citizen would

00:49:51.560 say to

00:49:51.840 that question?

00:49:53.760 Oh yeah,

00:49:54.060 of course.

00:49:54.740 Obviously.

00:49:55.500 Yeah,

00:49:55.720 obviously we

00:49:56.380 should relook

00:49:57.520 at the

00:49:57.760 asylum law

00:49:58.460 because it's

00:49:59.320 causing a

00:49:59.780 problem.

00:50:01.020 Why is that

00:50:01.700 not happening?

00:50:02.220 We'll say

00:50:05.660 40%.

00:50:06.420 They don't

00:50:07.660 say 40%.

00:50:08.540 If anybody

00:50:09.360 hears the

00:50:12.080 situation

00:50:12.540 described

00:50:13.460 as the

00:50:15.280 entire

00:50:15.600 source of

00:50:16.260 all the

00:50:16.520 illegal

00:50:16.880 immigration

00:50:17.420 from

00:50:17.920 Africa

00:50:19.280 and the

00:50:20.020 Middle 0.95

00:50:20.200 East

00:50:20.500 and China,

00:50:21.860 nobody's

00:50:22.380 going to

00:50:22.520 be in

00:50:22.760 favor of

00:50:23.060 that.

00:50:23.820 Nobody.

00:50:24.420 You

00:50:24.600 probably

00:50:24.860 couldn't

00:50:25.060 even get

00:50:25.340 one

00:50:25.580 person.

00:50:27.400 So if

00:50:28.140 you describe

00:50:28.720 it properly

00:50:29.300 it would

00:50:29.760 be closer

00:50:30.160 to 100%

00:50:30.940 it would

00:50:31.140 be in

00:50:31.880 favor of

00:50:32.200 relooking

00:50:32.860 at it

00:50:33.260 and changing

00:50:33.740 and it

00:50:34.740 doesn't

00:50:34.960 happen.

00:50:36.680 What could

00:50:37.460 the possible

00:50:38.120 reason for

00:50:38.720 that be?

00:50:39.240 Well,

00:50:39.540 corruption.

00:50:40.500 There's no

00:50:40.900 other reason.

00:50:43.720 Here's what

00:50:44.320 I think.

00:50:45.100 I think we

00:50:45.660 should have

00:50:46.040 a percentage

00:50:46.900 that we

00:50:48.520 use as a

00:50:49.240 standard to

00:50:49.940 know when

00:50:50.340 corruption is

00:50:50.940 happening.

00:50:52.340 For example,

00:50:53.280 let's say

00:50:53.600 70%.

00:50:54.460 If there's

00:50:55.660 something that

00:50:56.120 the public

00:50:56.580 understands,

00:50:57.760 they understand

00:50:58.300 the question,

00:50:58.920 it's not

00:50:59.220 complicated,

00:51:00.420 and 70%

00:51:01.360 of the public

00:51:01.820 wants it,

00:51:03.100 and Congress

00:51:03.980 won't do

00:51:04.480 it,

00:51:05.360 I think we

00:51:06.520 just assume

00:51:07.040 it's corruption.

00:51:08.080 If it's

00:51:08.760 50-50,

00:51:10.200 you can

00:51:10.900 kind of

00:51:11.220 understand why

00:51:11.840 things don't

00:51:12.380 get done.

00:51:13.840 Right?

00:51:14.480 You can

00:51:14.800 understand that.

00:51:16.240 But if it's

00:51:16.760 70-30

00:51:17.540 in the public,

00:51:20.620 and let's

00:51:21.740 say there's a

00:51:22.220 majority in

00:51:22.820 both parties,

00:51:24.120 but it's

00:51:24.440 70-30 overall,

00:51:25.640 but a majority

00:51:26.300 in both parties,

00:51:27.160 and it doesn't

00:51:27.560 get done,

00:51:27.960 how can

00:51:29.160 that be

00:51:29.440 explained

00:51:29.780 any other

00:51:30.220 way but

00:51:30.560 corruption?

00:51:31.500 Even

00:51:31.760 incompetence

00:51:32.420 wouldn't get

00:51:32.800 you there,

00:51:33.400 because they

00:51:33.780 do get

00:51:34.200 stuff done,

00:51:35.460 so it's

00:51:36.300 not incompetence,

00:51:37.480 it's got to

00:51:37.860 be intentional.

00:51:39.240 Why?

00:51:40.260 Just corruption.

00:51:42.000 I can't

00:51:42.640 think of

00:51:42.900 another reason.

00:51:43.900 We may

00:51:44.240 find out more

00:51:44.800 about the

00:51:45.160 January 6th

00:51:45.900 hoax,

00:51:46.860 especially the

00:51:47.540 fact that they

00:51:48.060 threw away all

00:51:48.760 their records.

00:51:50.360 Maybe we'll

00:51:50.940 find out if

00:51:51.500 aliens are

00:51:52.180 visiting the

00:51:52.740 earth,

00:51:53.000 or they've

00:51:53.340 always been

00:51:53.720 there.

00:51:53.900 All right,

00:51:56.460 remember I've

00:51:57.180 told you that

00:51:57.820 when I took

00:51:58.760 hypnosis classes,

00:51:59.860 I learned that

00:52:01.480 when people do

00:52:02.120 these so-called

00:52:03.400 Freudian slips,

00:52:05.580 that they do

00:52:07.180 mean something,

00:52:08.180 especially if

00:52:08.840 there's more

00:52:09.260 than one.

00:52:10.520 One could be

00:52:11.560 a mistake,

00:52:12.400 just a slip,

00:52:13.460 but if somebody

00:52:14.020 does the same

00:52:14.560 type of slip

00:52:15.460 over and over

00:52:16.000 again,

00:52:16.320 it's really

00:52:16.740 telling you

00:52:17.180 something.

00:52:18.200 And I saw

00:52:18.700 Kanekoa the

00:52:20.000 Great,

00:52:21.020 in one of his

00:52:21.700 posts,

00:52:22.240 he showed a

00:52:23.200 compilation,

00:52:23.900 video of

00:52:25.520 Biden saying

00:52:26.380 things that

00:52:27.600 probably meant

00:52:28.280 exactly what

00:52:29.020 they said,

00:52:30.180 or exactly

00:52:30.700 what he said.

00:52:31.600 Here are some

00:52:32.140 of the things

00:52:32.440 he has said

00:52:32.880 in public.

00:52:34.420 I don't need

00:52:35.300 you to vote

00:52:35.780 for me.

00:52:39.820 As if the

00:52:40.560 vote wasn't

00:52:41.060 going to matter,

00:52:41.820 like he was

00:52:42.280 going to win,

00:52:42.960 and then he

00:52:43.320 talked about

00:52:43.820 he needs you

00:52:44.460 to help him

00:52:45.080 after he gets

00:52:45.620 elected.

00:52:47.060 He actually

00:52:47.440 said I don't

00:52:47.980 need you to

00:52:48.400 vote for me.

00:52:50.260 Now,

00:52:50.900 he also said

00:52:52.640 that we have

00:52:53.140 the most

00:52:53.520 extensive and

00:52:54.340 inclusive voter

00:52:55.700 fraud organization

00:52:56.780 in American

00:52:57.380 politics.

00:52:58.520 We assume

00:52:59.400 what he

00:52:59.720 intended to

00:53:00.400 mean is we

00:53:01.520 have an

00:53:01.900 anti-fraud

00:53:02.760 organization.

00:53:04.100 But what he

00:53:04.840 said was we

00:53:06.340 have the

00:53:06.700 biggest fraud

00:53:07.460 organization.

00:53:09.320 Now,

00:53:09.760 if that were

00:53:10.340 the only thing

00:53:11.200 he said,

00:53:12.520 again,

00:53:13.080 I'd say,

00:53:13.480 well,

00:53:13.800 he's old,

00:53:15.140 it's just a

00:53:15.680 slip.

00:53:16.300 It's easy to

00:53:17.100 say,

00:53:18.180 you know,

00:53:18.420 to forget

00:53:19.140 the anti.

00:53:20.300 That'd be

00:53:20.660 an easy

00:53:21.100 mistake.

00:53:22.420 But he

00:53:24.040 has also

00:53:24.460 said the

00:53:24.900 following

00:53:25.220 thing a

00:53:25.700 number of

00:53:26.120 times.

00:53:28.620 It only

00:53:29.360 matters who

00:53:29.820 counts the

00:53:30.320 votes.

00:53:31.520 A number

00:53:32.300 of times

00:53:32.920 in public,

00:53:34.140 Joe Biden

00:53:34.640 has said it

00:53:35.380 only matters

00:53:35.980 who counts

00:53:36.500 the votes.

00:53:37.760 Joe Biden

00:53:38.560 said that a

00:53:39.660 number of

00:53:40.140 times in

00:53:41.000 public about

00:53:42.080 the United

00:53:42.600 States,

00:53:43.600 that it only

00:53:44.160 matters who

00:53:44.700 counts the

00:53:45.180 votes.

00:53:45.500 out loud,

00:53:47.400 directly,

00:53:48.620 multiple

00:53:48.940 times.

00:53:50.860 Now,

00:53:51.120 of course,

00:53:51.500 he was

00:53:51.740 doing that

00:53:52.280 when complaining

00:53:53.100 about

00:53:53.460 Republicans,

00:53:54.420 you know,

00:53:54.680 maybe rigging

00:53:55.520 something.

00:53:56.720 And maybe

00:53:57.080 they do.

00:53:57.800 I don't know.

00:53:58.960 But he

00:53:59.920 says it

00:54:00.360 directly.

00:54:02.040 Now,

00:54:02.380 do you

00:54:02.720 think that

00:54:04.620 one person

00:54:05.340 could say

00:54:05.760 this many

00:54:06.340 things without

00:54:07.000 what he's

00:54:09.220 actually thinking?

00:54:10.060 I don't

00:54:10.340 need you to

00:54:10.940 vote for

00:54:11.280 me,

00:54:11.920 most extensive

00:54:12.760 voter fraud

00:54:13.380 organization,

00:54:14.480 and it only

00:54:14.920 matters

00:54:15.300 who counts

00:54:16.100 the votes.

00:54:17.660 That would

00:54:18.260 be a lot

00:54:18.920 of Freudian

00:54:19.880 slips.

00:54:22.040 Yeah,

00:54:22.740 that would

00:54:23.060 be a lot.

00:54:24.720 I'm going

00:54:25.260 to say this

00:54:25.720 is exactly

00:54:26.300 what it

00:54:26.620 looks like.

00:54:27.560 To me,

00:54:28.220 this is Joe

00:54:28.820 Biden being

00:54:29.560 completely aware

00:54:30.500 that the

00:54:30.900 election is

00:54:31.440 rigged,

00:54:32.260 and that it

00:54:32.780 needs to be

00:54:33.240 rigged in

00:54:33.640 his favor

00:54:34.160 in order for

00:54:35.400 him to win.

00:54:36.800 That's what

00:54:37.340 it looks like

00:54:37.780 to me.

00:54:38.640 Can't read

00:54:39.100 his mind,

00:54:40.360 but the

00:54:40.820 signal is

00:54:41.500 unmistakable.

00:54:42.360 I remind

00:54:52.920 you that

00:54:53.420 if you

00:54:53.840 see anything

00:54:54.460 about the

00:54:55.080 Epstein

00:54:55.480 client list

00:54:57.180 or the

00:54:58.740 flight list,

00:54:59.360 it would be

00:54:59.540 because Mike

00:55:00.160 Cernovich

00:55:00.640 retained a

00:55:02.640 lawyer and

00:55:03.380 got that.

00:55:06.160 Cernovich,

00:55:06.980 who had

00:55:07.380 nothing to do

00:55:08.120 with anything

00:55:08.820 to do

00:55:09.260 with Epstein.

00:55:10.660 He was

00:55:11.240 just a

00:55:11.700 concerned

00:55:12.260 citizen who

00:55:13.580 decided we

00:55:14.240 didn't know

00:55:14.640 enough.

00:55:15.600 And the

00:55:16.200 only reason

00:55:16.780 we know

00:55:17.140 anything is

00:55:18.880 because somebody

00:55:19.580 not involved

00:55:20.460 in the

00:55:20.820 government spent

00:55:22.560 his own

00:55:23.040 money to

00:55:24.280 make it

00:55:24.620 happen.

00:55:26.380 It's the

00:55:26.980 only reason

00:55:27.340 we know

00:55:27.640 that.

00:55:28.440 Cernovich

00:55:28.900 did it.

00:55:31.820 Just hold

00:55:32.820 that in your

00:55:33.160 head for a

00:55:33.620 moment.

00:55:35.060 That the

00:55:35.660 only reason

00:55:36.260 we know

00:55:36.600 anything is

00:55:38.680 because a

00:55:39.040 citizen did

00:55:39.620 it.

00:55:40.920 Spent his

00:55:41.340 own money.

00:55:42.740 Wanted to

00:55:43.080 know the

00:55:43.420 truth.

00:55:45.080 Just think

00:55:45.560 about that.

00:55:46.560 It's

00:55:46.860 incredible.

00:55:49.760 All right.

00:55:52.320 There's a

00:55:52.940 new poll for

00:55:53.540 Trump that

00:55:54.060 shows he's

00:55:54.720 leading Biden

00:55:56.520 with Hispanics

00:55:57.460 and young

00:55:57.980 voters.

00:55:59.460 Do you

00:55:59.720 believe that?

00:56:02.120 Do you

00:56:02.640 believe that

00:56:03.060 Trump would

00:56:03.500 actually in

00:56:04.340 a straight

00:56:05.520 up election,

00:56:06.080 do you think

00:56:06.380 he would

00:56:06.600 actually be

00:56:07.360 on Hispanics

00:56:09.420 and young

00:56:10.740 voters?

00:56:12.260 Wouldn't

00:56:12.520 that be

00:56:12.880 the biggest

00:56:14.800 switch around

00:56:16.380 we've ever

00:56:16.920 seen in

00:56:17.420 politics?

00:56:18.920 I'm not

00:56:19.420 sure I

00:56:19.720 believe it

00:56:20.100 yet.

00:56:21.660 Here's the

00:56:22.240 problem with

00:56:22.740 it.

00:56:23.320 I think

00:56:23.980 there's still

00:56:24.420 a lot of

00:56:24.800 undecideds.

00:56:27.000 And I feel

00:56:27.740 like the

00:56:28.040 undecideds

00:56:28.980 probably would

00:56:30.160 go where

00:56:30.520 they've

00:56:30.760 historically

00:56:31.280 gone.

00:56:32.700 So,

00:56:34.200 you know,

00:56:34.600 same in

00:56:34.960 2020?

00:56:35.360 I don't

00:56:37.080 know.

00:56:37.860 The polling

00:56:38.920 is having

00:56:39.420 some big

00:56:39.820 problems in

00:56:41.480 modern times.

00:56:42.580 I don't

00:56:42.800 know if

00:56:43.080 I'm going

00:56:44.340 to believe

00:56:44.660 this yet.

00:56:47.920 But Biden

00:56:48.780 also lost

00:56:49.360 support among

00:56:49.860 black voters.

00:56:52.660 Way down.

00:56:54.560 So,

00:56:55.260 what do

00:56:57.240 you make

00:56:57.480 of this?

00:57:00.320 Mainstream

00:57:00.920 media has

00:57:01.500 been calling

00:57:01.960 Trump a

00:57:02.800 white supremacist

00:57:04.120 and racist.

00:57:05.360 for, what,

00:57:06.560 seven years

00:57:07.240 straight?

00:57:08.220 Just non-stop.

00:57:10.380 And he's

00:57:11.160 actually gaining

00:57:11.960 in the group

00:57:12.840 that he's

00:57:14.000 supposed to

00:57:14.420 be the

00:57:14.840 white supremacist

00:57:15.840 against.

00:57:17.760 What's that

00:57:18.420 all about?

00:57:20.240 It's got to

00:57:20.940 be about

00:57:21.280 capability.

00:57:23.660 It's got to

00:57:24.340 be that people

00:57:24.860 are seeing

00:57:26.280 through the

00:57:26.860 propaganda

00:57:27.400 at this

00:57:27.780 point.

00:57:28.540 If you

00:57:29.180 were Hispanic

00:57:30.040 or black,

00:57:31.900 don't you

00:57:32.300 think you

00:57:32.640 would have

00:57:32.880 noticed that

00:57:33.620 every white 0.53

00:57:34.500 person in

00:57:35.040 charge is

00:57:35.480 called a

00:57:35.820 white

00:57:36.000 supremacist?

00:57:37.480 And wouldn't

00:57:37.960 you just

00:57:38.320 start to

00:57:38.820 be blind

00:57:40.180 to it

00:57:40.560 because it's

00:57:41.000 like,

00:57:41.400 it's just

00:57:41.940 what we

00:57:42.220 call everybody.

00:57:44.800 I feel

00:57:45.780 like being

00:57:46.160 called a

00:57:46.580 racist

00:57:46.860 doesn't mean

00:57:47.420 anything

00:57:48.000 in 2024.

00:57:51.020 It just

00:57:51.520 doesn't have

00:57:51.920 anything.

00:57:52.860 It's just

00:57:53.300 empty.

00:57:54.480 There's nothing

00:57:55.040 to it anymore

00:57:55.660 because it's

00:57:56.520 so ridiculous

00:57:57.280 in most cases.

00:58:00.600 It's so

00:58:00.980 ridiculous that

00:58:01.700 you don't even

00:58:02.180 take it

00:58:02.460 seriously.

00:58:04.360 All right.

00:58:04.680 Well,

00:58:04.860 we'll see

00:58:05.120 if that

00:58:05.400 poll holds

00:58:06.720 up.

00:58:14.400 So,

00:58:15.460 Bannon

00:58:16.040 also was

00:58:16.760 talking about

00:58:19.380 how all

00:58:21.300 the Trump

00:58:21.660 supporters

00:58:22.240 are being

00:58:23.000 taken out

00:58:23.520 one by

00:58:23.880 one.

00:58:25.300 And you

00:58:26.160 see it,

00:58:26.560 right?

00:58:27.380 You see

00:58:27.780 anybody who

00:58:28.420 is pro-Trump

00:58:29.200 is being

00:58:29.640 targeted by

00:58:30.360 hit pieces

00:58:30.980 lawsuits and

00:58:33.640 all kinds

00:58:34.020 of stuff.

00:58:35.480 Now,

00:58:36.180 now that

00:58:38.140 you see

00:58:38.520 the larger

00:58:39.140 context,

00:58:41.820 I'm too

00:58:42.520 close to

00:58:43.040 this to

00:58:43.820 be objective.

00:58:46.700 But do

00:58:47.160 you think

00:58:47.520 that me

00:58:48.100 being canceled

00:58:48.860 globally

00:58:49.880 was political

00:58:51.200 or was it

00:58:53.160 really about

00:58:53.700 what I

00:58:54.040 said?

00:58:56.820 How many

00:58:57.480 of you think

00:58:57.840 it was

00:58:58.060 political?

00:58:58.480 Yeah.

00:59:00.980 You may

00:59:03.340 be influenced

00:59:03.920 by me

00:59:04.360 when you

00:59:04.660 say that.

00:59:06.580 Yeah.

00:59:07.080 I think

00:59:07.700 we're all

00:59:08.000 biased on

00:59:08.460 that question.

00:59:10.400 Here's

00:59:10.920 what I

00:59:11.200 think.

00:59:13.440 I think

00:59:14.280 that it's

00:59:15.420 never one

00:59:15.960 thing.

00:59:17.300 Most

00:59:17.720 things are

00:59:18.140 complicated.

00:59:19.280 So,

00:59:19.560 most things

00:59:20.000 have multiple

00:59:20.800 reasons and

00:59:21.900 multiple

00:59:22.420 variables.

00:59:23.400 So,

00:59:23.640 I don't

00:59:23.780 think it

00:59:24.100 was necessarily

00:59:24.740 completely

00:59:25.360 political.

00:59:26.480 But I

00:59:26.800 don't think

00:59:27.160 I would

00:59:27.440 have been

00:59:27.700 canceled

00:59:28.020 worldwide

00:59:28.660 unless I

00:59:30.500 had been

00:59:30.800 speaking

00:59:31.160 politically

00:59:31.660 for a

00:59:32.100 long time.

00:59:33.480 Do you?

00:59:34.560 Do you

00:59:35.080 think I

00:59:35.360 would have

00:59:35.540 been

00:59:35.740 canceled

00:59:36.140 had I

00:59:38.040 not been

00:59:38.580 a political

00:59:39.220 voice?

00:59:41.680 I don't

00:59:42.280 think so.

00:59:43.420 Because for

00:59:43.780 one thing,

00:59:44.200 you never

00:59:44.520 even would

00:59:45.020 have known

00:59:45.280 about it.

00:59:47.260 Right?

00:59:47.740 If I

00:59:48.340 were not

00:59:48.720 somebody who

00:59:49.300 talked about

00:59:49.720 politics all

00:59:50.440 the time,

00:59:51.700 nobody would

00:59:52.320 have even

00:59:52.820 tweeted around

00:59:54.000 the video.

00:59:55.340 Nobody would

00:59:55.720 even know

00:59:56.060 about it.

00:59:56.560 China got 0.95

00:59:58.740 me.

00:59:59.780 Maybe.

01:00:00.720 But I

01:00:01.000 think the

01:00:01.300 fact that

01:00:01.660 the Washington

01:00:02.180 Post was

01:00:02.880 leading it

01:00:03.520 is not a

01:00:05.800 coincidence.

01:00:07.140 Now,

01:00:07.360 there's also

01:00:07.760 a business

01:00:08.460 element to

01:00:09.140 it.

01:00:09.900 Because I've

01:00:10.620 been a

01:00:10.880 critic of

01:00:11.340 the Washington

01:00:11.760 Post long

01:00:12.520 before they

01:00:13.000 canceled me.

01:00:13.800 So they

01:00:14.220 were paying

01:00:14.660 me while I

01:00:15.200 was criticizing

01:00:15.860 them.

01:00:16.480 That wasn't

01:00:16.960 going to

01:00:17.160 last.

01:00:19.440 Let me

01:00:20.300 tell you,

01:00:20.720 the least

01:00:21.420 surprising

01:00:22.100 thing was

01:00:23.260 the Washington

01:00:23.740 Post

01:00:24.080 canceling me.

01:00:25.040 Because I've

01:00:25.400 been calling

01:00:25.760 them shit

01:00:26.280 for years.

01:00:28.940 And they

01:00:29.260 are.

01:00:29.460 They're just

01:00:29.780 complete garbage, 0.78

01:00:30.860 the Washington

01:00:31.200 Post.

01:00:32.420 So that's

01:00:33.120 not a

01:00:33.380 surprise.

01:00:35.100 Yeah, so

01:00:35.380 that's a

01:00:35.680 political

01:00:35.980 dimension.

01:00:40.500 And just

01:00:42.620 imagine

01:00:43.080 somebody saying

01:00:44.200 this even a

01:00:44.920 few years

01:00:45.480 ago.

01:00:46.200 Here's

01:00:46.540 Vivek

01:00:47.020 Ramaswamy.

01:00:48.300 He was

01:00:48.600 talking about

01:00:49.080 Claudine

01:00:49.520 Gay, the 0.94

01:00:50.020 president of

01:00:50.520 Harvard.

01:00:50.760 Harvard, and

01:00:51.540 you ask

01:00:52.040 yourself, could

01:00:53.340 any major

01:00:54.020 candidate for

01:00:54.940 office have

01:00:56.200 said this

01:00:57.100 even a few

01:00:58.180 years ago?

01:00:59.580 To see how

01:01:00.320 things have

01:01:00.700 changed.

01:01:01.720 So this is

01:01:02.380 Vivek Ramaswamy.

01:01:04.400 Claudine

01:01:04.880 Gay raises a 1.00

01:01:05.740 problem for

01:01:06.220 Harvard that

01:01:07.500 Kamala raises

01:01:08.420 for the

01:01:08.900 Democrats.

01:01:10.780 Uh-oh.

01:01:12.120 Uh-oh.

01:01:14.640 Are you already

01:01:16.180 a little bit

01:01:16.700 worried for him?

01:01:17.940 Uh-oh.

01:01:18.320 Where's he

01:01:18.880 going with

01:01:19.240 this?

01:01:20.080 Yeah, so

01:01:20.920 Claudine

01:01:21.520 Gay raises 1.00

01:01:23.600 the problem

01:01:23.980 for Harvard

01:01:24.320 and the

01:01:24.500 Kamala raises

01:01:25.060 for the

01:01:25.440 Democrats.

01:01:26.240 When someone

01:01:26.740 got the job

01:01:27.500 based on race

01:01:28.360 and gender,

01:01:29.560 it becomes

01:01:30.080 impossible to

01:01:31.000 fire them. 0.94

01:01:32.580 The Supreme

01:01:33.540 Court ended

01:01:34.120 affirmative action

01:01:35.060 in college

01:01:35.540 admissions.

01:01:36.580 Now time to

01:01:37.360 end it in

01:01:38.080 university hiring.

01:01:40.880 Wow.

01:01:45.260 Yeah.

01:01:46.660 He says it

01:01:47.200 directly.

01:01:48.320 That Kamala 0.97

01:01:49.560 and Claudine

01:01:50.800 Gay are

01:01:51.240 diversity

01:01:51.860 hires, and

01:01:53.040 if you do

01:01:53.400 diversity

01:01:53.960 hire, you

01:01:55.140 can't fire

01:01:55.680 them.

01:01:57.360 He says

01:01:58.040 that's what

01:01:58.380 we're seeing.

01:01:59.640 Oh, my

01:02:00.120 God.

01:02:01.200 Now, am I

01:02:01.720 wrong?

01:02:02.100 You couldn't

01:02:02.520 really say

01:02:03.120 that.

01:02:03.540 If you

01:02:03.840 were a

01:02:04.060 major

01:02:04.300 candidate,

01:02:05.400 you couldn't

01:02:05.840 really say

01:02:06.280 that three

01:02:06.760 years ago,

01:02:07.380 could you?

01:02:08.960 You'd be

01:02:09.620 canceled.

01:02:11.360 Will he be

01:02:12.400 canceled?

01:02:13.020 No.

01:02:15.320 So what

01:02:16.320 has changed?

01:02:18.320 Let me

01:02:19.820 ask you,

01:02:20.300 what has

01:02:20.560 changed?

01:02:22.060 Why can

01:02:22.800 we say

01:02:23.140 this out

01:02:23.540 loud now?

01:02:25.460 What

01:02:26.000 changed?

01:02:29.980 Well, some

01:02:30.960 of it is

01:02:31.760 people like

01:02:32.640 me who

01:02:34.060 are just

01:02:34.800 unwilling to

01:02:35.520 be censored

01:02:36.200 at any

01:02:36.880 cost.

01:02:37.800 So there's

01:02:38.480 some of

01:02:38.720 that.

01:02:38.940 some of

01:02:42.320 it is

01:02:42.580 leadership,

01:02:43.700 accidental as

01:02:45.260 well as

01:02:45.640 intentional.

01:02:46.520 In

01:02:46.640 Vivek's

01:02:47.140 case, it's

01:02:47.660 intentional.

01:02:49.260 He's

01:02:49.700 showing

01:02:50.180 leadership,

01:02:51.560 so it

01:02:52.040 makes it

01:02:52.380 safer for

01:02:52.860 you.

01:02:53.420 In other

01:02:53.780 cases, people

01:02:54.460 showed

01:02:54.780 leadership

01:02:55.240 accidentally.

01:02:57.520 I guess that

01:02:58.180 would be the

01:02:58.560 case for me.

01:02:59.620 I wasn't

01:03:00.060 trying to

01:03:00.740 show you

01:03:01.040 any

01:03:01.240 leadership.

01:03:01.640 It worked

01:03:03.380 out that

01:03:03.760 way.

01:03:04.020 But I

01:03:06.840 think that

01:03:07.300 people are

01:03:08.020 fed up.

01:03:08.840 I think

01:03:09.180 that the

01:03:09.720 immigration

01:03:11.440 feels

01:03:13.860 different when

01:03:15.300 it's no

01:03:15.680 longer our

01:03:16.300 neighbors.

01:03:18.100 Because the

01:03:18.440 way I feel

01:03:18.980 about my

01:03:19.440 neighbors,

01:03:21.040 Mexico and

01:03:22.000 Central

01:03:22.800 America, is

01:03:23.900 really, really

01:03:24.660 different than

01:03:25.800 I feel about

01:03:26.340 somebody who

01:03:26.880 flew from

01:03:27.360 the other

01:03:27.660 side of the

01:03:28.020 world.

01:03:29.040 I just have

01:03:29.680 a better

01:03:30.100 feeling about

01:03:30.720 my neighbors,

01:03:31.780 period.

01:03:32.060 So, some

01:03:34.360 of it is

01:03:34.740 immigration, some

01:03:35.640 of it is

01:03:36.060 leadership, some

01:03:37.060 of it is

01:03:37.720 Vivek, some

01:03:39.520 of it is

01:03:40.020 people just

01:03:40.560 have it, some

01:03:41.560 of it is

01:03:42.260 just too

01:03:43.700 far.

01:03:45.480 Yeah, hashtag

01:03:46.260 too far.

01:03:46.900 I think that's

01:03:47.320 really the

01:03:47.740 thing that

01:03:48.160 explains it

01:03:48.740 most.

01:03:51.620 Well, Qatar 0.91

01:03:53.760 mediators,

01:03:54.980 Qatar if you

01:03:55.740 prefer, they

01:03:57.700 think they have

01:03:58.220 some agreement

01:03:58.820 in principle

01:03:59.420 to have a

01:04:00.420 one month

01:04:02.640 ceasefire and

01:04:04.540 get 40

01:04:05.120 hostages

01:04:05.660 back.

01:04:07.420 What do you

01:04:08.080 think of

01:04:08.340 that?

01:04:11.020 Do you

01:04:11.700 think a

01:04:12.060 one month

01:04:12.640 ceasefire to

01:04:13.740 get 40

01:04:14.220 hostages

01:04:14.740 back a good

01:04:16.400 deal?

01:04:18.180 You know, I

01:04:18.680 would have

01:04:19.100 said no

01:04:20.000 earlier in

01:04:22.140 the war,

01:04:22.800 but at this

01:04:23.880 point, Israel

01:04:24.600 has such a

01:04:25.520 control over

01:04:26.740 the area and

01:04:27.340 they've destroyed

01:04:27.960 so much, would

01:04:30.560 a month

01:04:31.380 actually help

01:04:32.040 Hamas or 0.74

01:04:32.680 would they

01:04:33.020 just starve

01:04:33.840 in a month?

01:04:36.020 Here's the

01:04:36.620 main question.

01:04:38.280 I believe that

01:04:39.320 in the beginning

01:04:40.000 time was on

01:04:41.120 the side of

01:04:41.720 Hamas, because 1.00

01:04:43.020 if you gave

01:04:43.500 them some

01:04:43.920 extra time,

01:04:44.560 they could

01:04:44.820 prepare extra

01:04:45.600 good.

01:04:46.720 But once

01:04:47.340 they've been

01:04:47.760 degraded to

01:04:48.600 a certain

01:04:49.000 point, and

01:04:50.500 presumably

01:04:50.940 they'd be

01:04:51.400 running out

01:04:51.880 of food and

01:04:53.020 water and

01:04:53.800 ammunition and

01:04:54.580 everything,

01:04:54.820 once they're

01:04:56.180 running out

01:04:56.700 of stuff, and

01:04:57.920 there's not

01:04:58.320 any easy way

01:04:59.020 to get new

01:04:59.540 stuff in,

01:05:00.320 because I'm

01:05:00.660 sure it's

01:05:01.940 tight, then

01:05:05.000 can you afford

01:05:05.820 to take a

01:05:06.360 month?

01:05:07.440 Because what

01:05:07.980 is Hamas 0.64

01:05:08.440 going to do

01:05:08.860 in a month?

01:05:11.560 They're not

01:05:12.080 going to get

01:05:12.420 any new

01:05:12.760 supplies.

01:05:14.980 They're not

01:05:15.360 going to,

01:05:16.560 what are they

01:05:16.940 going to,

01:05:17.160 they're going

01:05:17.440 to be in

01:05:17.680 their tunnel

01:05:18.060 for another

01:05:18.500 month.

01:05:19.600 I mean, at

01:05:19.920 this point,

01:05:20.280 you could just

01:05:20.620 leave them in

01:05:21.080 the tunnel,

01:05:21.640 couldn't you?

01:05:23.380 You know, and

01:05:23.860 little by

01:05:24.800 little, you

01:05:25.380 find out

01:05:26.300 where the

01:05:26.620 tunnel

01:05:26.860 entries are,

01:05:27.840 and, you

01:05:28.520 know, maybe,

01:05:30.440 let me propose

01:05:33.100 this.

01:05:34.160 If you had a

01:05:34.980 ceasefire, does

01:05:37.100 that mean that

01:05:37.800 the IDF, the

01:05:39.320 Israeli forces,

01:05:40.760 would have

01:05:41.280 easier access

01:05:42.560 to look for

01:05:43.840 tunnel openings

01:05:44.700 and search

01:05:46.500 around for

01:05:46.980 their targets

01:05:47.580 if nobody's

01:05:49.180 shooting at

01:05:49.640 them as

01:05:49.900 they're walking

01:05:50.280 down the

01:05:50.720 street?

01:05:52.620 Now, I

01:05:52.980 don't imagine,

01:05:53.400 I can't

01:05:53.800 even imagine

01:05:54.220 how you

01:05:54.540 could have

01:05:54.800 a ceasefire.

01:05:55.820 Does anybody

01:05:56.280 think a

01:05:56.720 ceasefire would

01:05:57.340 hold for a

01:05:57.860 month?

01:05:59.760 Who thinks

01:06:00.520 a ceasefire

01:06:01.060 would hold

01:06:01.420 for a

01:06:01.720 month?

01:06:03.540 I don't.

01:06:05.180 I think

01:06:05.620 it, you

01:06:06.160 know, two

01:06:06.980 hour stops.

01:06:08.640 But here's

01:06:10.720 the question.

01:06:11.280 If you're

01:06:12.220 tempted to

01:06:13.120 say that

01:06:14.700 Israel would 1.00

01:06:15.340 be giving

01:06:15.740 away a

01:06:16.360 military

01:06:16.840 advantage by

01:06:17.820 pausing,

01:06:19.380 I'm not so

01:06:20.600 sure.

01:06:20.840 that was

01:06:22.280 definitely

01:06:22.600 true in

01:06:22.960 the beginning.

01:06:23.520 It would

01:06:23.780 have been a

01:06:24.120 military

01:06:24.460 advantage to

01:06:25.120 give away.

01:06:26.140 But now?

01:06:27.900 I don't

01:06:28.520 think that

01:06:29.080 watching from

01:06:30.100 the outside

01:06:30.600 we have

01:06:31.060 enough

01:06:31.340 information.

01:06:33.240 But I

01:06:33.560 suspect that

01:06:35.200 Israel could 0.95

01:06:36.300 maybe wait a

01:06:37.300 month without

01:06:38.440 losing too

01:06:39.120 much.

01:06:39.460 And if they

01:06:39.840 got some

01:06:40.200 hostages back,

01:06:41.160 it's a win.

01:06:41.580 So I'm

01:06:43.900 tentatively

01:06:44.600 mildly in

01:06:45.920 favor of

01:06:46.600 this.

01:06:49.380 But I'm

01:06:50.280 very skeptical

01:06:51.040 that anybody

01:06:51.760 would agree to

01:06:52.400 a one-month

01:06:52.940 ceasefire.

01:06:54.340 Seems like

01:06:54.860 fake news.

01:06:56.500 Doesn't it?

01:06:57.940 Why do you

01:06:58.440 need a month?

01:07:00.920 What's a

01:07:01.580 month by you?

01:07:03.420 Why can't

01:07:03.880 you do it

01:07:04.240 in a week?

01:07:06.160 I don't know.

01:07:07.080 Speaking of

01:07:07.680 Netanyahu, his 0.70

01:07:08.580 popularity is

01:07:09.400 down to 15%,

01:07:11.260 1-5, in

01:07:12.660 Israel.

01:07:14.780 That's how

01:07:15.380 many want him

01:07:15.880 to keep his

01:07:16.340 job after

01:07:16.920 Gaza.

01:07:17.480 But weirdly,

01:07:18.160 his Gaza

01:07:18.560 policies are

01:07:19.260 popular.

01:07:20.460 Now, have

01:07:20.740 you ever seen

01:07:21.200 that before?

01:07:22.480 Have you ever

01:07:22.920 seen a country

01:07:23.620 go to war and 0.97

01:07:24.540 their leader

01:07:25.560 became less

01:07:26.500 popular?

01:07:29.580 So Israel 0.99

01:07:30.540 is attacked

01:07:31.380 and their

01:07:32.820 leader, who

01:07:33.360 they say is

01:07:33.940 doing apparently

01:07:34.820 a good job

01:07:35.700 of the

01:07:36.660 response,

01:07:37.780 and he's

01:07:39.000 less popular?

01:07:40.620 What is

01:07:41.200 going on

01:07:41.640 here?

01:07:42.220 How does

01:07:42.480 that make

01:07:42.780 sense?

01:07:44.020 How do you

01:07:44.400 get less

01:07:44.920 popular by

01:07:45.660 doing a

01:07:46.100 good job

01:07:46.720 in a

01:07:47.800 national

01:07:48.220 emergency?

01:07:51.280 I feel

01:07:51.960 like maybe

01:07:52.340 the data

01:07:52.840 is wrong.

01:07:54.660 Like maybe

01:07:55.180 it's the

01:07:55.540 way they

01:07:55.840 asked the

01:07:56.240 question?

01:07:57.920 Something like

01:07:58.360 that?

01:07:59.800 I don't know.

01:08:00.360 Maybe a

01:08:00.720 TikTok thing?

01:08:02.480 Speaking of

01:08:03.160 TikTok,

01:08:04.660 so I,

01:08:05.640 as you know,

01:08:06.540 I don't

01:08:07.060 use TikTok

01:08:07.580 for the

01:08:08.740 obvious reasons

01:08:09.520 because it's

01:08:10.800 a Chinese

01:08:11.340 propaganda

01:08:11.900 machine,

01:08:12.520 but a lot

01:08:13.480 of the

01:08:13.680 TikTok

01:08:13.900 videos end

01:08:14.920 up on

01:08:16.180 other sites

01:08:16.840 after the

01:08:17.840 fact.

01:08:19.100 Have you

01:08:19.880 ever gone

01:08:20.320 down the

01:08:20.920 rabbit hole

01:08:21.720 of the

01:08:22.540 anti-Israel

01:08:24.400 argument?

01:08:27.840 So I

01:08:28.780 ended up,

01:08:29.520 I guess the

01:08:29.980 algorithm decided

01:08:30.900 to feed me

01:08:31.540 anti-Israel

01:08:32.220 stuff yesterday.

01:08:32.940 So I saw

01:08:33.900 more anti-Israel 0.69

01:08:34.960 stuff yesterday

01:08:35.780 than I've

01:08:36.920 seen since

01:08:37.860 the beginning

01:08:38.220 of the war.

01:08:39.580 Every bit

01:08:40.320 of it had

01:08:41.480 a TikTok

01:08:41.920 label on

01:08:42.680 it.

01:08:44.000 Let me

01:08:44.540 say that

01:08:44.920 again.

01:08:45.720 I've seen

01:08:46.140 more anti-Israel 0.69

01:08:47.300 propaganda in

01:08:48.440 the last 48

01:08:49.460 hours, I

01:08:49.940 guess, than

01:08:50.860 everything put

01:08:52.100 together before

01:08:52.740 that.

01:08:54.040 All of it

01:08:54.880 had a TikTok

01:08:55.580 label on

01:08:56.260 it.

01:08:56.540 In other

01:08:56.780 words, it

01:08:57.080 started in

01:08:57.640 TikTok and

01:08:58.260 ended up

01:08:58.760 where I

01:08:59.080 saw it.

01:09:01.220 Now,

01:09:01.700 there's

01:09:02.960 one thing

01:09:03.400 that both

01:09:04.020 the pro-Israel

01:09:06.120 and the

01:09:06.740 anti-Israel

01:09:07.440 propaganda

01:09:08.080 have in

01:09:08.580 common.

01:09:09.880 And it's

01:09:10.560 maddening.

01:09:12.120 It's

01:09:12.420 maddening.

01:09:13.640 They both

01:09:14.260 ignore the

01:09:15.100 other side

01:09:15.640 of the

01:09:15.840 argument when

01:09:16.700 they make

01:09:17.060 their argument.

01:09:18.700 So I

01:09:19.180 actually listened

01:09:19.880 to somebody

01:09:20.520 talking to

01:09:22.020 a Palestinian

01:09:23.420 citizen who

01:09:25.600 was complaining

01:09:26.260 that her

01:09:26.660 house was

01:09:27.320 bulldozed

01:09:27.980 and that 26

01:09:29.600 other houses

01:09:30.360 had been

01:09:30.860 bulldozed

01:09:31.440 around the

01:09:32.220 same time.

01:09:34.840 Isn't there

01:09:35.300 like a

01:09:35.660 follow-up

01:09:36.160 question to

01:09:36.780 that?

01:09:38.560 It was in

01:09:39.320 a documentary

01:09:39.900 I saw.

01:09:40.820 Isn't there

01:09:41.220 a follow-up

01:09:41.740 question like,

01:09:43.220 was there

01:09:44.000 any reason

01:09:44.500 for that?

01:09:46.400 They don't

01:09:47.120 bulldoze

01:09:48.620 houses

01:09:49.020 randomly.

01:09:50.400 They

01:09:50.880 bulldoze

01:09:51.360 your house

01:09:51.780 because somebody

01:09:52.560 in the house

01:09:53.060 was a

01:09:53.440 terrorist,

01:09:54.960 according to

01:09:55.580 Israel.

01:09:56.340 Now, that

01:09:56.700 doesn't mean

01:09:57.080 they're going

01:09:57.340 to be right

01:09:57.740 every time.

01:09:58.620 It doesn't

01:09:59.000 mean that I

01:09:59.440 necessarily support

01:10:00.480 what they're

01:10:00.780 doing.

01:10:01.020 I'm just

01:10:01.760 saying that

01:10:02.880 if you're

01:10:03.200 complaining about

01:10:03.840 your house

01:10:04.340 getting bulldozed

01:10:05.360 and you don't

01:10:06.580 at least say a

01:10:07.280 few words about

01:10:08.060 maybe why they

01:10:08.820 did it,

01:10:09.800 that's not a

01:10:10.960 documentary.

01:10:12.000 That's bullshit.

01:10:13.400 That's some

01:10:14.060 bullshit right

01:10:14.640 there.

01:10:16.400 Likewise,

01:10:17.520 when Israel

01:10:18.520 says,

01:10:19.500 hey,

01:10:20.580 you know,

01:10:21.020 we let the

01:10:22.040 Palestinians,

01:10:23.240 you know,

01:10:23.520 determine their

01:10:24.120 own future

01:10:24.700 and all that,

01:10:25.800 and they leave

01:10:26.560 out what life

01:10:28.880 is like for the

01:10:29.700 average Palestinian.

01:10:31.580 Well,

01:10:32.320 that's just

01:10:32.780 bullshit propaganda

01:10:33.880 too.

01:10:35.560 So the

01:10:36.280 argument that I

01:10:37.160 was hearing

01:10:37.640 from the

01:10:38.860 anti-Israel

01:10:39.520 ones is,

01:10:40.540 if you had

01:10:41.580 lived the way

01:10:42.420 the Palestinians

01:10:43.140 live,

01:10:44.900 could you

01:10:45.720 imagine that

01:10:46.380 you might also

01:10:47.280 become,

01:10:47.900 or it's

01:10:48.480 easier to

01:10:48.980 imagine somebody

01:10:49.640 would become a

01:10:50.580 suicide bomber

01:10:51.740 because they

01:10:53.120 have no hope.

01:10:53.800 Now,

01:10:55.120 the anti-Israel

01:10:55.940 propaganda

01:10:56.960 was trying

01:10:59.500 to push

01:10:59.940 the position

01:11:00.660 that if you

01:11:01.940 made the

01:11:02.480 Palestinians

01:11:03.140 prosperous and

01:11:04.600 healthy,

01:11:05.180 they would have

01:11:06.180 no reason to

01:11:06.920 attack Israel 0.96

01:11:07.660 and then your

01:11:08.320 problem would be

01:11:09.020 solved.

01:11:10.040 And therefore,

01:11:10.800 logically,

01:11:12.100 all of Israel's

01:11:13.300 problems are

01:11:13.960 caused by Israel,

01:11:15.420 say the

01:11:15.760 propagandists,

01:11:17.120 because Israel

01:11:18.000 is doing the

01:11:18.600 thing that

01:11:19.660 makes the

01:11:20.100 Palestinians

01:11:20.640 miserable,

01:11:21.340 and it's

01:11:22.840 the misery

01:11:23.300 that caused 0.77

01:11:23.840 them to

01:11:24.160 become terrorists.

01:11:25.080 Therefore,

01:11:25.460 it's really

01:11:25.820 all Israel's 0.91

01:11:26.540 fault.

01:11:27.320 Is there

01:11:27.600 anything left

01:11:28.180 out of that

01:11:28.620 story?

01:11:30.820 Yes.

01:11:31.900 What is left

01:11:32.840 out is if the

01:11:33.920 Palestinians were 0.99

01:11:34.820 prosperous and

01:11:35.640 healthy,

01:11:36.340 they would still

01:11:36.880 want to

01:11:37.380 destroy Israel. 0.90

01:11:39.820 It wouldn't

01:11:40.500 be any

01:11:40.820 different.

01:11:42.740 It is also

01:11:44.220 true that

01:11:46.080 their lives

01:11:46.720 are a struggle

01:11:47.500 in many ways.

01:11:49.960 But it's

01:11:50.660 not true that

01:11:51.260 if you fixed

01:11:51.840 it, there's

01:11:52.800 any evidence

01:11:53.660 whatsoever,

01:11:55.120 any evidence,

01:11:56.040 there's not

01:11:56.420 even a hint

01:11:57.040 that it would

01:11:57.720 make any

01:11:58.100 difference at

01:11:58.540 all, because

01:12:00.200 the children

01:12:01.080 are being

01:12:02.060 taught to

01:12:02.860 kill the

01:12:03.680 Jews and

01:12:04.360 the Zionists 0.99

01:12:05.520 are all

01:12:05.820 bad.

01:12:07.420 If they

01:12:08.840 start making

01:12:09.340 more money,

01:12:09.960 they're not

01:12:10.240 going to stop

01:12:11.200 thinking they

01:12:11.820 need to do

01:12:12.280 that stuff.

01:12:13.320 Now, it

01:12:13.740 might be

01:12:14.080 harder to

01:12:14.800 recruit a

01:12:16.800 suicide bomber.

01:12:18.300 It might be

01:12:18.780 harder.

01:12:19.080 But didn't

01:12:21.260 those, correct

01:12:23.420 me if I'm

01:12:23.940 wrong, but

01:12:25.440 weren't the

01:12:26.020 9-11

01:12:26.740 suicide

01:12:28.380 hijackers,

01:12:30.360 weren't they

01:12:30.880 Saudi, some 0.56

01:12:32.000 of them or

01:12:32.420 all of them?

01:12:33.020 How many of

01:12:33.420 them were

01:12:33.620 Saudi residents?

01:12:35.940 Yeah.

01:12:36.700 They didn't

01:12:37.500 even come from

01:12:38.420 a country where

01:12:39.920 everybody's abused,

01:12:41.380 at least in

01:12:42.040 that way.

01:12:42.460 the other

01:12:48.240 thing that

01:12:48.760 is a real

01:12:49.860 tell, is

01:12:51.420 that when

01:12:51.740 you hear the

01:12:52.460 complaints of

01:12:54.300 the Palestinians,

01:12:55.760 they actually

01:12:56.760 sound, if you

01:12:57.840 were to take

01:12:58.240 them out of

01:12:58.720 context, and

01:13:00.000 you didn't

01:13:00.320 know why

01:13:00.920 things were

01:13:01.540 the way they

01:13:01.940 were, it

01:13:02.660 does sound

01:13:03.100 pretty bad.

01:13:04.640 Like their 0.88

01:13:05.300 inability to

01:13:07.440 use roads,

01:13:09.540 their lack

01:13:10.460 of access to

01:13:11.220 as much

01:13:11.640 water, those

01:13:13.060 are real

01:13:13.400 things.

01:13:14.700 But you

01:13:14.940 know what?

01:13:16.000 You know what

01:13:16.460 is very much

01:13:17.040 like Black 1.00

01:13:17.540 Lives Matter?

01:13:19.980 Some of you

01:13:20.720 remember that

01:13:21.380 in the early

01:13:21.860 Black Lives

01:13:22.480 Matter days, I

01:13:24.020 was hearing

01:13:24.460 complaints that

01:13:25.280 I thought, you

01:13:25.740 know what?

01:13:26.700 Some of those

01:13:27.480 complaints sound

01:13:28.220 like things

01:13:28.720 everybody would

01:13:29.320 agree with.

01:13:30.620 Like, let's

01:13:31.720 have less

01:13:32.280 police brutality.

01:13:34.280 Good.

01:13:34.940 I like that.

01:13:36.200 And how

01:13:36.620 about maybe

01:13:37.260 we get

01:13:37.600 everybody, you

01:13:38.600 know, we

01:13:39.060 help fund

01:13:39.660 police camps.

01:13:40.660 So they

01:13:41.360 have body

01:13:41.760 cams.

01:13:42.720 That's good

01:13:43.420 for everybody.

01:13:44.340 Removes any

01:13:44.940 questions about

01:13:45.660 what happened.

01:13:47.080 So I thought

01:13:47.720 to myself, hey,

01:13:49.180 maybe I can be

01:13:50.240 useful.

01:13:50.880 I'll help Black

01:13:51.440 Lives Matter

01:13:51.980 get what they're

01:13:52.760 asking for,

01:13:54.160 because that

01:13:55.240 sounds reasonable

01:13:55.840 to me.

01:13:57.200 And then I

01:13:57.680 learned that

01:13:58.480 Black Lives Matter

01:13:59.200 didn't really have

01:14:00.080 any interest in

01:14:00.740 solutions.

01:14:02.300 Yeah, that's a

01:14:03.080 longer story.

01:14:04.060 But trust me

01:14:04.880 when I say

01:14:05.540 I'm not guessing

01:14:07.340 that they had

01:14:08.460 no interest

01:14:09.040 in solutions.

01:14:10.220 I found it

01:14:10.780 out the hard

01:14:11.240 way.

01:14:11.860 They had no

01:14:12.360 interest in

01:14:12.980 solutions whatsoever.

01:14:14.840 And I think

01:14:15.760 that the

01:14:16.620 Palestinians have 1.00

01:14:17.340 the same

01:14:17.620 problem.

01:14:18.860 If Black 0.95

01:14:19.680 Lives Matter

01:14:20.280 had started

01:14:20.920 with, let's

01:14:21.500 say, a

01:14:22.700 list of

01:14:23.220 three to

01:14:23.680 five reasonable

01:14:25.560 sounding demands

01:14:26.940 and said

01:14:28.480 from the

01:14:28.880 beginning, this

01:14:29.540 is the stuff

01:14:30.120 we want.

01:14:31.060 We want

01:14:31.660 these five

01:14:32.220 things.

01:14:32.960 I think they

01:14:33.720 would have

01:14:33.940 found a lot

01:14:34.440 of support.

01:14:34.960 I might

01:14:36.680 have been

01:14:36.880 one of

01:14:37.200 them, you 0.56

01:14:38.580 know, if

01:14:38.820 there were

01:14:39.100 five reasonable

01:14:39.860 things.

01:14:42.320 But where,

01:14:43.460 have you ever

01:14:44.040 seen the

01:14:44.460 Palestinians put 1.00

01:14:45.440 together their,

01:14:46.860 you know, their

01:14:47.940 list of the

01:14:49.080 five reasonable

01:14:50.420 things they

01:14:51.020 want to live

01:14:52.980 good lives?

01:14:54.800 Of course

01:14:55.380 not.

01:14:56.320 Because they're

01:14:57.380 not really

01:14:58.040 dealing on

01:14:58.860 the I want

01:14:59.520 some reasonable

01:15:00.280 compromise

01:15:01.160 level.

01:15:02.280 They want

01:15:02.720 to kill

01:15:03.620 all the Jews 0.83

01:15:04.320 and,

01:15:04.960 take over

01:15:05.540 the land

01:15:06.060 and satisfy

01:15:07.580 their dead

01:15:08.060 ancestors and

01:15:09.080 all that

01:15:09.880 stuff.

01:15:11.540 So, here's

01:15:12.740 the thing you

01:15:13.100 need to know

01:15:13.480 about all the

01:15:13.940 propaganda from

01:15:14.740 either the

01:15:15.380 pro or

01:15:15.960 anti-Israel

01:15:16.600 side.

01:15:17.280 It always

01:15:17.920 leaves out

01:15:18.440 the other

01:15:18.960 side's

01:15:20.260 position.

01:15:21.700 So, it's

01:15:22.320 all just

01:15:22.640 useless

01:15:23.000 bullshit.

01:15:24.220 And that's

01:15:24.640 why I say

01:15:25.360 you can talk

01:15:27.680 all day about

01:15:28.360 how things

01:15:28.820 should be

01:15:29.320 and what

01:15:30.580 people should

01:15:31.100 do.

01:15:32.080 It's useless.

01:15:33.700 It's pure

01:15:34.360 power.

01:15:35.960 The Middle 0.95

01:15:37.360 East is

01:15:37.960 just power

01:15:38.680 and nobody

01:15:40.040 does anything

01:15:40.740 because that's

01:15:41.520 the right

01:15:41.800 thing to

01:15:42.160 do.

01:15:42.920 It's just

01:15:43.860 brainwashing

01:15:44.540 and power

01:15:45.000 and that's

01:15:46.180 the whole

01:15:46.460 story.

01:15:47.460 So, you

01:15:47.680 don't even

01:15:48.000 need to be

01:15:48.420 in favor

01:15:48.920 of anything

01:15:49.420 or against

01:15:49.900 anything.

01:15:50.920 It's just

01:15:51.600 power.

01:15:53.020 So, those

01:15:53.600 with power

01:15:54.140 will control

01:15:54.760 the land.

01:15:55.640 If that

01:15:56.240 changes and

01:15:57.140 somebody else

01:15:57.620 has the

01:15:57.940 power,

01:15:58.920 they will

01:15:59.500 take that

01:15:59.940 land.

01:16:01.140 That's

01:16:01.620 your future.

01:16:02.440 people want

01:16:11.540 to disrupt

01:16:12.820 the Western

01:16:13.580 prescribed

01:16:14.500 nuclear family.

01:16:15.480 Yeah, I've

01:16:16.060 heard that.

01:16:17.300 They're doing

01:16:17.640 a good job.

01:16:18.860 But I also

01:16:19.580 think that the

01:16:20.380 nuclear family

01:16:21.380 is a

01:16:22.260 historical relic

01:16:24.080 that will

01:16:25.520 never satisfy

01:16:26.500 75% of the

01:16:27.680 public.

01:16:28.700 25% is

01:16:29.580 perfect.

01:16:29.880 but 75%

01:16:32.220 it just

01:16:33.040 won't work.

01:16:34.620 So, we need

01:16:35.340 some kind of

01:16:35.780 a better model

01:16:36.380 for that.

01:16:36.800 But that's

01:16:36.980 another story.

01:16:38.040 Hey, everybody

01:16:38.640 on YouTube,

01:16:39.300 thanks for

01:16:39.680 joining.

01:16:40.600 And I'll

01:16:41.520 see you in

01:16:42.060 the morning

01:16:42.420 tomorrow

01:16:42.920 with more

01:16:44.500 fantastic

01:16:46.000 live streaming.

01:16:47.980 Bye for

01:16:48.540 now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 02, 2024

Episode 2341 CWSA 01⧸02⧸24 All That Will Be Revealed In 2024. I Can't Wait

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript