Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 02, 2024


Episode 2341 CWSA 01⧸02⧸24 All That Will Be Revealed In 2024. I Can't Wait


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per Minute

140.04262

Word Count

10,757

Sentence Count

811

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

41


Summary

In this episode, we talk about the sw swatting of George Soros, Jordan Peterson, and why the internet thinks Sam Harris is mentally ill. We also discuss Green Day's new album and what it's like to be a middle-aged dad.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:14.260 And I'm talking about after the Ice Age.
00:00:17.760 Anything before the Ice Age we don't know about, we're just guessing.
00:00:21.440 But since then, this has been the highlight.
00:00:24.020 If you'd like to take this up to a level that even Atlantis can't understand,
00:00:27.460 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a gel, a stein, a canteen, jug or a flask,
00:00:32.540 a vessel of any kind, filling with your favorite liquid.
00:00:36.300 I like coffee.
00:00:37.600 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine.
00:00:40.260 At the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:41.760 It's called the simultaneous sip and happens now.
00:00:43.600 Go.
00:00:50.060 Delightful.
00:00:52.060 Invigorating.
00:00:53.180 Refreshing.
00:00:54.480 Mmm.
00:00:54.840 Well, let's talk about all the news.
00:00:59.620 Apparently, George Soros, his house in Southampton got swatted.
00:01:05.540 So the swat was called the fake 911 thing.
00:01:09.980 And I have a few feelings about this.
00:01:13.440 Number one, I do not like this swatting business whatsoever.
00:01:18.180 It needs to stop.
00:01:19.400 My second feeling is, what the hell is wrong with me?
00:01:24.520 Seriously?
00:01:25.380 I'm not important enough to get swatted?
00:01:27.720 Oh, oh, Tim Poole can get swatted.
00:01:30.340 Marjorie Taylor Greene?
00:01:31.800 Fine.
00:01:32.620 Fine.
00:01:33.300 But do I get swatted?
00:01:34.440 No.
00:01:35.180 I have to sit here like an idiot and just say, other people got swatted.
00:01:39.720 Other people.
00:01:40.880 And nothing for me.
00:01:42.680 Nothing for me.
00:01:43.540 Do you people not know how much of a whore I am for attention?
00:01:49.900 People are getting attention all over the place.
00:01:53.420 I'm getting none.
00:01:55.260 Can we please turn some of this toward me?
00:01:58.860 That's what bothers me about this whole swatting stuff.
00:02:01.380 Well, if you're Sam Harris, you might not enjoy seeing that you're trending on the X platform,
00:02:08.240 which he no longer is a part of.
00:02:10.440 But why is Sam Harris trending?
00:02:14.320 Apparently, the entire internet, or at least the X platform, has decided that he looks like
00:02:20.160 he's mentally insane and that that explains his Trump opinions.
00:02:24.340 I can't tell you how many people have sent me the still photo of Jordan Peterson in a split
00:02:33.760 shot with Sam Harris.
00:02:36.480 And Sam Harris is, you know, looking deranged.
00:02:39.120 I'm not saying he is.
00:02:40.240 I'm just saying that the photograph makes him look deranged.
00:02:43.380 And Jordan Peterson is sort of sitting back thinking, well, we don't know what he's thinking.
00:02:50.020 But that's what people ask me.
00:02:51.360 They say, what do you think Jordan Peterson is thinking?
00:02:54.340 To which I say, if I were as smart as Jordan Peterson, I might know what he's thinking.
00:03:00.800 But if there's one thing I can warn you about, don't try to guess what people are thinking
00:03:08.260 if those people are smarter than you.
00:03:11.320 So I'm not going to try to guess what Einstein's thinking or Jordan Peterson.
00:03:18.980 Well, whatever they're thinking is probably better than whatever I'm thinking.
00:03:21.920 But, yes, if you're trending because the Internet thinks you look like you are mentally compromised,
00:03:30.700 that's not a good week for you.
00:03:33.300 And I would do what he did.
00:03:35.660 End your subscription to the platform that thinks you're mentally ill.
00:03:39.540 Now, in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with Sam Harris,
00:03:42.080 except that the Trump derangement syndrome does apparently, it looks like it broke him.
00:03:47.920 Like, joking aside, if I may, joking aside, we're not any experts on mental health, most of us.
00:03:58.780 Some of you might be.
00:04:00.480 But in all honesty, completely legitimately, it looks like there's a problem.
00:04:07.560 Like, actually, not just funny political thing to say, not just, you know, making some content for the show.
00:04:16.300 It legitimately looks like he could use a little help.
00:04:20.920 I mean, it does look like a cry for help.
00:04:23.220 And I'm actually a little concerned for him.
00:04:27.260 Literally.
00:04:28.640 Not a joke.
00:04:29.820 I'm a little bit concerned.
00:04:30.780 It kind of is starting to look like a cry for help.
00:04:36.500 So I hope that goes well anyway.
00:04:39.460 How many of you saw Green Day performing on New Year's Eve?
00:04:44.100 Did anybody catch Green Day?
00:04:50.740 I'll tell you what my first impression was when I saw it.
00:04:55.000 Yeah, I haven't seen them in a while.
00:04:56.400 I haven't seen them played live in a long time.
00:04:58.280 But when they came on stage, when I first saw them, it looked like a bunch of middle-aged dads who just left the barbecue.
00:05:09.400 And I was watching, who's the front person?
00:05:12.420 Billy Joe or something.
00:05:15.880 I was watching him, you know, bound onto the stage at the beginning of the show.
00:05:20.340 And his bounding on stage looked sort of like he had arthritis or something.
00:05:26.660 Billy Joe Armstrong.
00:05:28.280 Yeah, it was, it looked like a bunch of dads doing a cover band.
00:05:34.520 It was pretty embarrassing.
00:05:37.360 So anyway, it was funny to watch.
00:05:40.300 Apparently, the X platform will have bank payments.
00:05:46.200 Well, not bank payments, but financial payments you'll be able to do on X sometime in the middle of 2024, we expect.
00:05:52.700 But here's what I'm wondering about.
00:05:56.960 Is Elon Musk simply going to compete against other payment systems like Google Pay and Venmo?
00:06:04.920 Or is he going to try to recreate a bank?
00:06:11.880 Which would be really interesting.
00:06:13.720 In other words, could you do all of your banking on X?
00:06:16.840 If you were, let's say you didn't have complicated needs.
00:06:19.980 You know, basic banking is all you needed.
00:06:22.820 I wonder.
00:06:23.240 Do you think that there's going to be a micro lending platform?
00:06:29.460 And I wonder why we don't already have one.
00:06:32.640 Probably because of banks or something.
00:06:35.140 For example, why can't you and I give a loan to somebody on X?
00:06:42.660 And I'll say, you know what?
00:06:43.980 I don't really trust this thing, but I'll give a dollar.
00:06:46.260 I'll give a micro payment.
00:06:47.340 And then if somebody gets like, you know, a thousand views and a bunch of payments, they just launch their business.
00:06:54.560 And I'm at a dollar.
00:06:56.740 You don't think I would put one dollar on somebody who had a pretty good idea, but I don't know if it's going to work.
00:07:03.620 I mean, I'll put a dollar into it.
00:07:06.980 You know, if a million people put a dollar into it, a lot of people are going to try some new stuff.
00:07:11.500 So I don't know what kind of things, you know, Elon Musk has in mind, but I'd be a little disappointed if it's only payments.
00:07:21.020 I feel like there's a whole other level that you could take it to.
00:07:26.300 We'll see.
00:07:28.700 You should replace banks.
00:07:30.440 Banks are ridiculous.
00:07:31.340 Do you ever think about the fact that banks have a checking account, a savings account, a CD, a credit card, a loan of credit, and a mortgage for your house?
00:07:42.980 How does that make any sense?
00:07:45.780 Do you know what it should be?
00:07:48.260 You put your money in a bank, and if you've given the bank more money, you know, if you've put money in, they pay you interest.
00:07:59.580 And if you take from the bank more money than you have, then you pay them interest.
00:08:09.660 Shouldn't it be simple?
00:08:11.200 Shouldn't it be if you have my money, you give me interest.
00:08:13.720 If I have your money, I give you interest.
00:08:16.180 It shouldn't be that either.
00:08:17.360 There should be one account.
00:08:19.740 Why do you have more than one account?
00:08:22.620 Why do you have a checking account and then some kind of line of credit thing?
00:08:27.240 Shouldn't your checking account just turn into a line of credit if you spend more than you can?
00:08:33.860 And shouldn't it warn you, hey, you're spending more than you have now, but that's okay because you have credit.
00:08:40.120 Okay, you're getting close to your credit limit now.
00:08:42.200 You better slow down.
00:08:45.220 Do you know the reason that all those different products exist?
00:08:49.980 Let's just see how much you know about banking.
00:08:51.840 What is the reason so many different products exist?
00:09:00.180 Well, you're saying fees, and that's pretty good.
00:09:03.620 But is that right?
00:09:05.640 Because couldn't you just adjust, you know, if you had a simpler model, couldn't you just adjust your fees so you make the same amount of money?
00:09:13.700 And it's a simpler model.
00:09:16.820 Confusopoly is the correct answer.
00:09:18.640 It's a confusopoly.
00:09:19.660 So as long as everybody's in the business of confusing their customers, you really don't know where to take your money.
00:09:27.300 So you end up going whatever is easy or close or what your family uses or what your spouse uses.
00:09:33.540 That's about it.
00:09:34.500 Yeah.
00:09:35.220 If you were to invent banking from scratch, how much would it look like current banking?
00:09:42.980 Nothing.
00:09:44.080 Nothing.
00:09:44.600 It would be almost nothing except, you know, verifying your identity, basically, and, you know, keeping track of your money.
00:09:51.400 But basically, almost all of banking is unnecessary, unproductive, and stupid.
00:09:57.800 But because bankers have good lobbyists, they make the rules such that it's hard to get in the business.
00:10:05.040 So they don't have to compete with you as long as they can confuse you.
00:10:10.160 It's called a confusopoly.
00:10:12.380 How many of you have heard the term confusopoly?
00:10:17.740 It's in Wikipedia.
00:10:20.760 You haven't, really?
00:10:22.440 A lot of you have not heard the term?
00:10:23.700 I'm looking at your comments.
00:10:27.740 A lot of you have not heard the term a confused outlet.
00:10:30.380 So that's what a phone company is.
00:10:32.620 If you want to buy a cell phone service, are you really smart enough to know which service is going to give you a better price for the service?
00:10:42.340 Not really, because they don't price the same.
00:10:45.440 One will be minutes with some carryover.
00:10:48.060 Some will be a family plan.
00:10:49.840 One will be a year.
00:10:50.960 One will be two years.
00:10:52.040 Why do they do that?
00:10:54.940 They do that so you can't tell which one's the good one.
00:10:59.560 Now, do they have meetings where they collude and say, okay, let's be confusing?
00:11:03.880 Probably not.
00:11:05.260 But they all know that if they stay confusing, you can't compare them to the other people.
00:11:10.240 The moment you could compare a bank to its competitor or a phone company to its competitor or an insurance company to its competitor,
00:11:20.440 they would all go out of business because it would drive the competition to lower their prices to compete.
00:11:28.920 Because you could see exactly who had the better price for the service.
00:11:33.260 And the price would just keep going down until everybody goes out of business except one.
00:11:38.820 And you don't want that either.
00:11:40.280 So, yeah, it's a confusopoly.
00:11:45.580 And if you didn't know, that's a term I invented.
00:11:48.880 It's actually in the economic vocabulary now.
00:11:54.020 If you search for a confusopoly, you will find it's on Wikipedia and it's a fairly well understood concept from me.
00:12:03.320 Did I get my Nobel Prize in economics for inventing the confusopoly concept, which explains all modern pricing?
00:12:10.360 Well, we have a new study that says exercise makes you smarter.
00:12:23.720 I think we knew that.
00:12:24.980 But every time there's a new study that proves it, then it makes me feel smarter because I exercise.
00:12:31.560 Let me ask you this.
00:12:37.500 Have you noticed that there's a gigantic difference between people who get to roughly my age, you know, late 60s, and, you know, their mental decline?
00:12:48.240 You notice it, right?
00:12:50.060 It's not my imagination that you notice.
00:12:53.540 You notice.
00:12:55.040 Now, there are some people who do much better than others.
00:12:59.360 Take Ellen Dershowitz.
00:13:01.560 He's in his 80s.
00:13:03.440 And if you heard him talk, let's say, behind a curtain, you would have no idea his age.
00:13:10.460 There's no tell in the way that man talks.
00:13:13.480 He's like, how old is he?
00:13:15.220 He's like 83 or something.
00:13:16.820 How old is Dershowitz?
00:13:19.620 80, 81, something like that.
00:13:23.680 Yeah.
00:13:24.240 But imagine being 81, and if somebody heard you talk behind a curtain, they could not tell your age.
00:13:32.600 That's really impressive.
00:13:34.540 Really impressive.
00:13:35.460 Now, I don't know this, but give me a fact check if anybody knows this.
00:13:40.620 Is Dershowitz a lifelong exerciser?
00:13:43.880 Because he doesn't look like he has any body fat on him.
00:13:46.460 Does anybody know that?
00:13:49.780 I'll bet you.
00:13:51.620 Let me place a bet.
00:13:53.380 I'll bet you Dershowitz is a lifelong, moderate exerciser.
00:13:57.560 I want to see if somebody can confirm that.
00:14:01.140 Because I don't think there's any way your brain works that well at that age unless you've been a lifelong exerciser.
00:14:08.320 So I'm just going to put that out there.
00:14:10.840 Somebody says he runs?
00:14:11.800 Probably not still, but yeah.
00:14:14.540 So, I am a lifelong exerciser, and I believe that my brain works relatively well for my age.
00:14:25.320 But that's my self-assessment.
00:14:27.640 I'm going to keep exercising.
00:14:31.020 All right.
00:14:33.440 I don't know how many of you know this, but although I've been in favor of building the wall
00:14:38.440 and having tight border security since the beginning, I've always been in favor of having complete control on the border.
00:14:47.500 But, different from many of you, I had not been in favor of mass deportation.
00:14:54.820 So during Trump's first run, I said to you, don't worry about mass deportation.
00:15:00.180 It's not going to happen.
00:15:01.600 And that didn't happen.
00:15:02.340 So I didn't really get into the conversation about mass deportation because it seemed like a campaign thing,
00:15:09.340 not really a reality thing.
00:15:10.860 There were just too many of them.
00:15:12.540 You're not going to send back 25 million people who have been productive, American-like citizens for dozens of years and stuff.
00:15:20.860 It didn't seem practical.
00:15:22.680 Now, I understand the concept.
00:15:25.140 Break the law, there has to be consequence.
00:15:27.140 I get it.
00:15:27.740 I get it.
00:15:28.160 But if you weigh it against the human part and whether we can survive if they stay, which we can,
00:15:35.780 they add more than they subtract, in my opinion, over time, not right away.
00:15:40.860 But, as of today, I'd like to go on record in saying I am in favor of mass deportation.
00:15:48.060 I want you to hear that as clearly as possible.
00:15:50.440 So I'm reversing my long-held opinion that we don't need to send people back because we don't have too many.
00:15:59.320 That's what I used to think.
00:16:00.360 We don't have too many.
00:16:02.200 And also, I'm going to remind you again the reasoning.
00:16:05.460 When America takes on people from Mexico and Central America, we are more often than not,
00:16:13.480 you know, there's always going to be a criminal element that's in any population.
00:16:17.380 But more often than not, we're getting people who are more American than Americans.
00:16:21.640 Yeah, I said it.
00:16:22.900 I'm going to say it again.
00:16:24.140 We're getting people who are more American than Americans.
00:16:28.400 If you look at what makes an American, American, right?
00:16:32.080 You know, if you look at the traditional values, right, you know, I'm not saying they're good or bad.
00:16:37.740 But if you look at traditional values, good or bad, they tend to be religious, hardworking, family-oriented.
00:16:45.580 And they tend to be really good citizens pretty quickly.
00:16:51.260 They tend to integrate.
00:16:53.040 They learn the language.
00:16:54.120 Their second generation are awesome.
00:16:56.400 They're hard workers.
00:16:57.520 They've taken a risk to get here.
00:16:59.160 They really wanted to be here.
00:17:00.560 I mean, they really put in some effort to be here.
00:17:04.820 Now, like every conversation in the world, am I referring to every single person in the immigrant community?
00:17:13.720 No.
00:17:14.860 No.
00:17:15.940 Do I think that if you could snap your fingers and send people back, would I be in favor of it?
00:17:22.280 I don't know.
00:17:22.740 Maybe.
00:17:23.640 Maybe that would be a different conversation if it were practical.
00:17:26.920 But if it's not practical, and they're good Americans, and they have a good history of, you know, assimilation, well, it's not the biggest problem in my list of problems.
00:17:39.400 However, we now have a completely different situation.
00:17:42.640 We now have a situation where there's some kind of organized, well-funded, destroy America system in place in which the immigrants are coming from all over the world, and they're not coming from Central America and from Mexico primarily.
00:18:00.980 They're coming from Middle East, China, Africa, everywhere else.
00:18:09.480 Now, that system will destroy America if it's allowed to persist.
00:18:14.440 Apparently, we don't have any legal recourse for stopping this process because it's all legal.
00:18:21.560 Nobody's doing anything illegal.
00:18:23.260 They're just making it really easy for the immigrants to come here.
00:18:26.160 The only way to break that system, short of assassinating the people involved, which would be illegal, would be to make sure it doesn't pay.
00:18:34.360 So you'd have to start shipping back everybody who came from outside the hemisphere.
00:18:42.080 So when I say I'm in favor of mass deportation, I mean starting with people who didn't walk here, right?
00:18:52.020 If you had to get on a boat or a plane to get into our country, you're fucking going home.
00:18:58.860 If you walked, and I'll include the train and Mexico and stuff, if you walked, maybe you need to go home too, but last, last, right?
00:19:12.280 I would take care of everybody who came over the water or in a plane.
00:19:17.880 If they came from somewhere outside the Americas, every one of them, send back every one of them, 100%.
00:19:25.340 I don't care what it costs at any expense and any inconvenience at any price.
00:19:32.480 They all have to go back.
00:19:35.220 Now, the reason I'm not making such a big deal about Mexican immigration is apparently it's not that high.
00:19:42.340 It's not that high.
00:19:44.820 The Mexican immigration is not the biggest problem in the world.
00:19:48.620 And I don't know if you've paid attention, but there are a whole bunch of things happening in Mexico right now.
00:19:54.420 That would suggest their economy is getting ready to surge.
00:19:59.080 The Mexican economy has a bunch of good stuff happening.
00:20:02.180 They got this big train thing that's going to be good for everything.
00:20:06.920 We got stuff moving.
00:20:08.280 You know, manufacturing is moving in.
00:20:11.740 It's kind of a positive economic situation in Mexico, more so than ever before.
00:20:16.520 Oh, I have confirmation that Dershowitz is a workout guy.
00:20:24.020 I'll tell you.
00:20:25.100 If you see that people smoke cigarettes all their life and get cancer, lung cancer, it's probably good science.
00:20:31.760 If you see the science that people who exercise have fitter brains, and then every time you see a Dershowitz, you can predict whether they exercise.
00:20:42.220 I mean, just think about that.
00:20:43.560 I had no idea if Dershowitz exercises.
00:20:47.280 But just based on his brain and his age, I presumed he was a regular exerciser.
00:20:53.760 And sure enough, it's confirmed.
00:20:55.920 That's not an accident.
00:20:56.980 All right.
00:21:00.140 So mass deportation, I'm all for it.
00:21:03.220 And I think it's funny because the Atlantic is trying to scare the public that Trump is in favor of mass deportation.
00:21:11.400 In the first election, that was actually a pretty good attack.
00:21:16.360 Because even, you know, I was pro-Trump in the first, you know, 2016.
00:21:20.480 I was pro-Trump, and I didn't want to see mass deportation.
00:21:25.040 It seemed too hard.
00:21:26.980 But now it just makes sense.
00:21:29.200 Now it makes complete sense.
00:21:31.700 In fact, it's a no-brainer.
00:21:33.720 Now, I don't know how many people you could actually mass deport, but you should try really hard.
00:21:39.820 We should try really hard to deport every single person who flew or took a boat.
00:21:45.280 And we should shut that down right away.
00:21:48.300 Make it not pay.
00:21:49.440 All right.
00:21:50.440 All right.
00:21:51.520 So there's an influential American psychologist he's called, Martin Seligman.
00:21:59.720 He's in his 80s, and he found out recently that his people who know him and have worked with him had created a bot, an AI entity, based on all of his writings.
00:22:13.120 So they had apparently recreated him.
00:22:18.540 And when he tested it out, he actually thought, you know, actually, it gives pretty good advice.
00:22:24.080 So they've actually created an advice-giving entity that's based on a real person's writing.
00:22:30.800 And, of course, now they can make it photorealistic, and they can match the voice.
00:22:36.940 So I asked the following question.
00:22:40.160 Can a Scott bot be far behind?
00:22:42.860 Now, unlike most of you, I have a huge body of public work.
00:22:51.100 So if you're an author or if you're an American psychologist who wrote a lot, it should not be hard for a Scott bot to completely absorb my personality.
00:23:03.300 Because if you've got how many hours of live streaming do I do?
00:23:08.900 At least two hours a day.
00:23:13.300 So I'm up to like, you know, 800 hours a year times, what, five years?
00:23:19.380 And that's just live stream.
00:23:21.260 Then you add all the interviews that are on the Internet.
00:23:24.080 You add all of my books, all of my cartoons.
00:23:28.540 The cartoons don't exactly talk to my personality as much as my sense of humor, I guess.
00:23:33.840 The only thing that the Scott bot could not do is sense of humor.
00:23:43.720 So AI seems to be good on look and sound and grammar, but it's not good on sense of humor, and it's not good on, you know, not hallucinating yet.
00:23:57.520 Now, Brian Romelli promises us that sometime this year we'll have access to something he's working on, which would be a personal AI.
00:24:10.960 So you'd have your own AI agent.
00:24:12.960 Now, I'll tell you again that here's how the world will go.
00:24:16.080 Guarantee it.
00:24:17.960 This is the safest prediction you could ever make.
00:24:22.380 It seems unlikely to me that each person will have to go find their own AI app every time they want to do something.
00:24:32.780 We're going to have our own personal AI that nobody can touch, and that's the only thing that should interact with the other AIs.
00:24:41.420 So you won't interact directly with some other AI app.
00:24:45.620 You'll talk to your own, and it will figure out which app it needs to deal with to get you what you need.
00:24:50.940 Because it's going to be too hard to keep track of all the apps and what they can do and compare them.
00:24:57.860 It's going to be a confusedopoly.
00:25:00.040 Oh, here we go.
00:25:02.040 AI is already a confusedopoly.
00:25:06.180 Do you know why somebody would buy ChatGPT subscription instead of, let's say, you know, Bing?
00:25:15.360 Because they don't know the difference.
00:25:16.880 You're going to have a million apps that look like they're sort of the same, but they will price things differently, so you don't know which one's the good one.
00:25:25.960 So you're probably going to need your AI just to sort it through the AI confusopoly to figure out which ones to use at the right price.
00:25:33.860 Some will have term limits.
00:25:35.940 Right.
00:25:36.260 Some will have usage limits.
00:25:38.420 Some will have too much censorship.
00:25:40.700 So it will be impossible for you to sort out which app to use, and that will be intentional.
00:25:48.460 Well, you probably knew this, but the U.S. military finished their study of all the white supremacists and extremists in the military,
00:25:56.320 and they found extremists in the military, the white supremacists, they found, they didn't find any, there weren't any.
00:26:08.600 No, it wasn't zero, but it was something that looked like the rest of the public, right?
00:26:14.000 So there were some, there were actually some acts of extremism, but they were somewhat trivial in their numbers.
00:26:20.560 So, why was the military even looking?
00:26:27.200 Do you think that the generals believed there was a problem, or do you think it was always an op,
00:26:35.400 so that as long as they were looking for the problem and said there was a problem, it would put a cloud over Trump?
00:26:43.480 That was all just to put a cloud over a MAGA and Trump, right?
00:26:47.280 So that was an op, wouldn't you say?
00:26:51.320 But was it ever, do you think there was ever any chance that was real?
00:26:55.460 And that they just really, they were worried, and they really needed to find out?
00:26:59.540 Probably not.
00:27:00.600 It was probably exactly what it looked like.
00:27:02.260 It was a political op, that as long as they were talking about it, it was good for their team.
00:27:09.720 So, yes, our military is political.
00:27:14.140 Great, great.
00:27:16.300 Wouldn't it be good if they were just trying to protect us?
00:27:18.260 But no, they mostly want to see generals in dresses.
00:27:24.860 They want to see most of our leadership wearing dresses, because, you know, that scares China and Russia.
00:27:34.500 Look at our generals.
00:27:36.140 They look so good in dresses.
00:27:37.200 All right.
00:27:41.000 And yes, that's a sexist statement.
00:27:44.140 But when you talk, oh, let me explain this again in case anybody isn't new to me.
00:27:49.320 I'm completely opposed to any form of discrimination against individuals in employment, renting, loans, personal life, marriage, anything, anything individual.
00:28:06.100 Don't do any discriminating.
00:28:08.160 Don't discriminate on race or gender or, you know, sex or anything.
00:28:12.360 But there is an exception where you can discriminate all you want.
00:28:19.860 Did you know that?
00:28:21.860 Yeah.
00:28:22.480 Defense.
00:28:23.440 Your personal defense, you can discriminate as much as you want.
00:28:26.900 If somebody says, why did you punch that guy who was wearing a hat?
00:28:31.160 And you say, the last 10 people who wore a hat mugged me.
00:28:37.280 Okay.
00:28:38.380 Now, is it up to me to tell you that you acted incorrectly?
00:28:41.660 Well, maybe if you violated the law, the law has to get involved.
00:28:45.680 But do I think that you made a mistake by punching the 11th person who wore a hat if the first 10 people with hats punched you?
00:28:53.140 I do not.
00:28:53.800 To me, that seems like a quite reasonable self-defense stance, and I would not question it.
00:28:59.540 It might be illegal, and the law would have to deal with that.
00:29:03.020 But I'm not going to question it logically, ethically, or morally, because nobody gets to make the decision but you.
00:29:10.520 I don't get to make your personal defense decisions.
00:29:14.540 If somebody is an intruder in your house, are you going to call me and say,
00:29:19.060 Scott, there's an intruder in my house.
00:29:20.820 Should I shoot them?
00:29:22.280 It's not up to me.
00:29:23.800 Only you can make that decision.
00:29:26.000 And you know what?
00:29:26.580 You can use anything you want.
00:29:28.540 You can use anything you want.
00:29:31.120 You could use your biases.
00:29:34.840 Absolutely.
00:29:36.100 Yeah.
00:29:36.620 If there's somebody in your house, a home invader, you can use any bias you want.
00:29:43.880 Any bias you want.
00:29:45.280 It's not illegal.
00:29:46.400 It's not immoral.
00:29:47.220 It's not inethical.
00:29:48.940 Because it's self-defense.
00:29:49.980 Likewise, national defense discriminates like crazy.
00:29:56.040 Right?
00:29:56.500 Does anybody complain that our pilots have to have good eyesight?
00:30:02.560 Does anybody complain that our soldiers need to have legs that work?
00:30:09.880 Nobody complains.
00:30:11.300 Because when it comes to defense, you don't fuck around.
00:30:15.300 You do what works.
00:30:17.840 End of story.
00:30:19.720 End of story.
00:30:20.440 So, yes, you can discriminate all you want in the military.
00:30:27.420 But maybe they should get back to that instead of looking for bad MAGA people in the ranks.
00:30:32.660 So, according to a professor at Georgetown University, who used to be in the CIA, he was a CIA analyst, Dr. John Gentry, he says he believes that the intel agencies are going to try to interfere in the 2024 election.
00:30:58.280 So, he's an actual ex-CIA guy who is credible enough to be a Georgetown University professor, and he thinks it's somewhat obvious that they're going to interfere with the election.
00:31:12.160 Now, of course, he points to the famous Hunter laptop thing as an example.
00:31:19.600 And he says that the intel agencies have been compromised by politics.
00:31:24.220 But here's what he says is the reason.
00:31:26.120 He said the old standard of not getting involved in politics was largely gone.
00:31:32.900 And he pointed to two main reasons.
00:31:35.560 Former CIA director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper.
00:31:42.740 Now, is there anybody who watches television or follows the news who doesn't know that those two gentlemen have a lot of questions to answer?
00:31:52.500 Is there anybody who didn't know that there's something about those two?
00:31:58.280 There's something about them that you need to know.
00:32:00.840 I don't know what it is, but there's something about them you need to know.
00:32:07.560 And he blames them for bringing in DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, and policy actions that basically made it political.
00:32:17.260 So, apparently, if you hire people for their DEI characteristics, you might get more people who are political.
00:32:28.220 I don't know if that's directly connected, but that seems to be what he's suggesting.
00:32:33.340 And he now thinks that political activism is common.
00:32:39.720 So, we now have a number of people saying that they think our own intelligence agencies will assassinate Trump or attempt to.
00:32:52.660 So, the people saying that directly are Vivek Ramaswamy running for president and telling you that one of the candidates is likely to be assassinated.
00:33:05.260 Not just maybe, but likely, before it even happens.
00:33:12.260 Now, we're also seeing Steve Bannon say it.
00:33:14.400 I think Jack Posobiec said it.
00:33:16.720 I think Sernovich has hinted at that as well.
00:33:19.440 I say it directly as well.
00:33:21.620 How many people, Tucker, Tucker Carlson says it directly.
00:33:28.340 RFK Jr., I think he's saying it directly.
00:33:30.960 Is he not?
00:33:34.420 Now, have we ever, Don Bongino is saying it directly.
00:33:38.800 Alex Jones is saying it directly.
00:33:41.820 I'm looking at some names going by as you're suggesting them.
00:33:45.140 Have you ever seen a situation like this before?
00:33:48.980 This is pretty unprecedented, isn't it?
00:33:50.980 Do you know that it's possible that the only thing keeping Trump alive is us?
00:34:00.200 Literally us.
00:34:01.640 And when I say us, I mean the people who are independent enough that they can say out loud in public, in front of all of you,
00:34:10.500 it looks like they're going to try to kill him.
00:34:13.980 Because they've created a situation where they've talked themselves into being evil enough that that makes sense.
00:34:20.260 I feel like it's our collective understanding of this risk and our willingness to say it out loud and look crazy.
00:34:34.480 This is not easy to say it out loud.
00:34:36.380 You do look a little like you're close to the edge there.
00:34:39.380 But I don't think it looks crazy at all.
00:34:42.460 I think that it looks obvious.
00:34:45.740 You know, and Tucker does the best job of explaining it.
00:34:49.100 You know, once they don't beat you in the vote and they don't beat you in the impeachment and they can't beat you in putting you in jail,
00:34:56.160 there aren't options.
00:34:58.860 What's left?
00:34:59.520 And I don't think that we, you know, can say it's never happened in American history.
00:35:06.140 Because there's a strong suggestion that JFK was not what it looked like.
00:35:12.100 So, honestly, I think we're keeping Trump alive.
00:35:17.280 We being people who are willing to say this out loud.
00:35:20.400 Because if it happens, God forbid, but if it happens,
00:35:25.320 then nobody will be surprised at the response.
00:35:31.900 I don't know what it would be.
00:35:32.980 But whatever it is, it's going to be big.
00:35:36.740 And I'll tell you one thing.
00:35:39.420 If Trump goes down,
00:35:42.460 you're going to get something just as aggressive.
00:35:47.300 The one thing that the Republicans are doing well,
00:35:51.760 with the exception of Nikki Haley,
00:35:53.360 is that they're suggesting that there's something behind Trump that could be as interesting as Trump.
00:35:59.800 You know, certainly be vague.
00:36:02.120 All right.
00:36:04.520 In my opinion,
00:36:05.720 the biggest existential risk to the United States is the DEI.
00:36:10.700 Now,
00:36:11.340 I'm not saying that with like a clever political hyperbole.
00:36:16.680 I actually think that's true.
00:36:18.660 Like literally,
00:36:21.760 scientifically,
00:36:23.980 you know,
00:36:24.400 objectively,
00:36:26.160 and somewhat obviously.
00:36:28.480 Because DEI is the only thing that can break everything.
00:36:33.420 Everything else that could go wrong,
00:36:36.460 at least we have everything else that's still working to fix it.
00:36:41.000 You know what I mean?
00:36:42.520 Like if we had a tech,
00:36:43.520 not let's take the year 2000 bug.
00:36:46.840 The year 2000 bug was something that was broken.
00:36:49.740 You know,
00:36:49.880 we thought the computers were going to stop working because they couldn't handle the year 2000.
00:36:54.740 But because our technology industry was so robust and healthy,
00:37:00.040 it fixed it.
00:37:02.240 Right.
00:37:02.660 So there are things that we can do wrong,
00:37:05.580 but because our military is good,
00:37:08.000 then we got away with it.
00:37:09.800 Right.
00:37:10.400 So there's a whole bunch of situations where you can make,
00:37:13.600 you know,
00:37:13.820 have a big problem in some part of your larger system,
00:37:17.300 but you can fix it.
00:37:19.140 There's the rest of the stuff still working.
00:37:21.560 So the rest of the stuff figures out how to fix the stuff that's broken.
00:37:25.160 But DEI is different.
00:37:26.480 DEI by its nature guarantees that you're looking for a small pool of candidates to add to your
00:37:36.540 diversity.
00:37:37.760 And simply because the numbers are small,
00:37:40.460 you're going to end up going further down in the quality list in order to get your number.
00:37:45.920 So necessarily,
00:37:47.660 even if you assume that every person was equal quality in the world,
00:37:52.220 you know,
00:37:52.340 every demographic group,
00:37:53.700 if you even start with that assumption,
00:37:55.720 it still destroys the world.
00:37:57.960 This is an important point.
00:38:00.040 If you start with the assumption that all the ethnicities and genders are equal capability,
00:38:07.020 equal potential,
00:38:08.300 if you start with that and you operate on that assumption and try to get equal numbers of them,
00:38:14.000 that will destroy the world.
00:38:16.220 It's guaranteed.
00:38:17.980 If you were an engineer and somebody said,
00:38:20.460 I'm going to design a system and they take all the politics out,
00:38:23.700 and they just described it like a machine,
00:38:26.500 an engineer would say,
00:38:27.620 well,
00:38:27.820 obviously that's not the word.
00:38:30.720 It's only because it's political that we even think it makes any sense at all.
00:38:36.340 Right?
00:38:36.860 It doesn't make sense logically,
00:38:40.100 engineering wise,
00:38:41.340 physics wise,
00:38:42.620 doesn't make sense in terms of math.
00:38:46.940 There's literally no argument for it,
00:38:49.120 except that it's how people feel and what they want to feel.
00:38:52.960 So DEI can destroy and is literally every part of the country.
00:39:00.960 So you can see it's the claim here is that DEI from this professor,
00:39:07.760 Professor Gentry,
00:39:10.660 he would claim that DEI is ruining the intelligence people.
00:39:14.980 We just talked about the military wasting energy looking for white supremacists that they couldn't find.
00:39:25.540 Why does that happen?
00:39:27.220 DEI.
00:39:28.540 It's all part of the same philosophy.
00:39:30.500 Why is it that the system is more divided racially?
00:39:34.740 DEI.
00:39:35.800 Why are our corporations no longer as capable?
00:39:38.980 DEI.
00:39:39.620 Why is it that every time you go to get any simple thing done,
00:39:44.480 just accomplish any simple thing that involves another person helping you,
00:39:48.920 you can't get it done.
00:39:50.500 There's like a massive incompetence problem in the country.
00:39:53.840 Again,
00:39:54.880 not related to race or religion or gender.
00:39:58.100 If that's what you're hearing,
00:40:00.820 you're missing the whole point.
00:40:03.300 This would be a problem if everybody had exactly same average capability.
00:40:08.400 You'd get the same problem.
00:40:10.160 It's just you're trying too hard to force a square peg into a round hole in a short time frame,
00:40:16.600 and it can only go one way.
00:40:18.580 So until we can say that out loud,
00:40:23.100 there's no hope of fixing it.
00:40:25.480 But I do think that 2024 will be the year.
00:40:30.200 It will be the year that we can say that out loud,
00:40:33.300 and then there can be some changes.
00:40:35.920 Certainly,
00:40:36.600 Harvard has destroyed its entire reputation with DEI.
00:40:41.160 So the colleges are worthless.
00:40:42.920 The military is degraded.
00:40:44.440 Our intelligence is bad.
00:40:46.100 Intelligence departments.
00:40:47.000 And our government,
00:40:48.620 of course,
00:40:49.000 is a basket case.
00:40:50.720 And our corporations are less competitive.
00:40:54.460 And then throw on top of that climate change and whatever regulations that causes.
00:41:00.980 Yeah,
00:41:01.440 we're basically doing it to ourselves.
00:41:03.680 It's self-inflicted.
00:41:07.580 Here are some fun things we could find out in 2024.
00:41:12.540 There's some indication there might be some Epstein flight logs,
00:41:16.840 those released that would be different than the ones you've seen.
00:41:20.040 There are a bunch of fake ones and old ones going around.
00:41:23.500 Ignore those.
00:41:24.300 I don't know what's real yet.
00:41:25.720 But ignore the fake Epstein lists.
00:41:29.000 Don't believe anything you see about an Epstein list unless you see it on the major news.
00:41:33.740 If you see it only on social media.
00:41:41.860 Um...
00:41:42.220 Umberto Eco and John Cialdini send their love.
00:41:46.200 Don't know what that means.
00:41:49.840 Anyway,
00:41:50.360 here's some things we might find out.
00:41:51.740 We might find out more about Epstein,
00:41:53.540 but I doubt it.
00:41:55.040 Because obviously that's been buried pretty hard.
00:41:58.240 Um...
00:41:59.040 At this point,
00:42:00.560 here are the things we can say about Epstein.
00:42:02.820 There's no doubt whatsoever he was murdered.
00:42:05.860 There's no doubt whatsoever our government had some involvement.
00:42:09.960 Maybe other governments,
00:42:11.340 but certainly ours.
00:42:12.580 And there's no doubt whatsoever
00:42:14.280 that it was to cover up
00:42:16.360 for the powerful people that were being blackmailed.
00:42:20.100 There's no doubt at all.
00:42:21.860 Does anybody have any doubt
00:42:23.540 about what happened with the Epstein situation?
00:42:26.320 We're way past
00:42:28.460 any questions about that,
00:42:29.960 are we?
00:42:30.900 It's exactly what it looks like.
00:42:34.120 It's exactly what it looks like.
00:42:37.200 Yeah.
00:42:37.940 And do you think Bill Barr is dirty?
00:42:42.680 Because Bill Barr was the one who
00:42:44.400 essentially put the stamp of approval
00:42:47.760 on the suicide narrative.
00:42:53.360 It looks like it.
00:42:55.220 Yeah.
00:42:55.380 I mean,
00:42:56.360 it would take some investigation to know,
00:42:59.760 but on the surface,
00:43:00.860 it looks like he is compromised.
00:43:03.520 Or that he did it.
00:43:04.680 Now, let me give you the positive version.
00:43:07.520 The positive version is that
00:43:09.200 he knew it would destroy the world
00:43:11.340 if we found Bill.
00:43:13.720 So there is a possibility
00:43:15.500 that he's saving the world.
00:43:17.380 You know that, right?
00:43:19.020 It's not your choice.
00:43:20.140 It's not your first choice
00:43:21.160 because you'd rather know.
00:43:22.720 And you'd rather let the cards fall
00:43:24.620 where they fall.
00:43:25.240 But if you're in his position
00:43:26.960 and you knew that releasing this
00:43:30.120 could actually
00:43:30.820 destroy the world order,
00:43:34.420 which it might,
00:43:36.700 you know,
00:43:36.880 it could destroy,
00:43:37.760 let's say,
00:43:39.080 alliances.
00:43:41.020 It could destroy marriages.
00:43:42.720 It could destroy the effectiveness
00:43:43.780 of leaders.
00:43:45.420 It could destroy a lot.
00:43:46.680 Do you think there's any chance
00:43:49.900 that Bannon's,
00:43:50.960 I'm sorry,
00:43:51.960 that Barr,
00:43:52.980 do you think there's any chance
00:43:53.940 that Barr said,
00:43:54.620 you know what,
00:43:55.740 I hate everything about this Epstein thing.
00:43:58.000 He's guilty as hell.
00:43:59.580 There was definitely a lot of blackmail,
00:44:01.740 but I got to cover this shit up
00:44:03.280 because the world isn't ready for this.
00:44:06.180 What do you think?
00:44:06.700 So I'm going to say
00:44:09.500 this is my working assumption.
00:44:12.000 My working assumption
00:44:13.100 is that Barr covered it up,
00:44:15.420 but I'm going to be open-minded
00:44:17.400 as to why.
00:44:20.760 Your assumption is
00:44:22.180 it's for a bad reason.
00:44:23.720 It might be.
00:44:25.000 Certainly,
00:44:25.860 that's the first thing you think.
00:44:28.100 But
00:44:28.320 put yourself in this position.
00:44:31.900 Would you necessarily
00:44:33.220 destroy the country
00:44:35.820 to just know the truth?
00:44:40.540 I don't know.
00:44:41.820 Don't know.
00:44:43.760 So I'm going to say
00:44:44.600 that I think Barr
00:44:46.040 is a more interesting character
00:44:47.520 because he's not
00:44:49.560 immune to patriotism.
00:44:52.300 He is not immune to patriotism.
00:44:54.760 I don't know what else he is,
00:44:55.800 but I don't think
00:44:56.860 he's immune to patriotism.
00:44:58.700 So
00:44:58.940 I'm going to give him
00:45:00.860 at least that possibility.
00:45:03.700 Here are some things
00:45:04.400 we might,
00:45:04.940 just think about the things
00:45:05.860 we might find out
00:45:06.900 in 2024.
00:45:08.640 Now,
00:45:09.080 I'm not going to bet
00:45:09.720 that any of these
00:45:10.380 will happen,
00:45:11.640 but we might.
00:45:12.740 We might find out
00:45:13.780 some surprises
00:45:14.500 about the 2020 election.
00:45:17.460 Or at the very least,
00:45:19.080 we'll find out
00:45:20.260 there are no surprises
00:45:21.180 because there are
00:45:21.920 some specific things
00:45:23.060 that people are
00:45:23.720 tracking down
00:45:24.900 that look
00:45:25.340 look kind of interesting.
00:45:28.120 I don't want
00:45:28.820 to say cracking.
00:45:30.160 They do look interesting.
00:45:32.880 I think we'll find out
00:45:34.320 a lot more
00:45:35.000 about the trials
00:45:36.400 against Trump
00:45:37.160 and how fake they are.
00:45:39.200 So,
00:45:39.840 we're talking about
00:45:41.180 a month from now
00:45:42.020 we might get
00:45:42.660 some kind of an answer
00:45:43.740 about whether
00:45:44.820 Trump's businesses
00:45:45.840 will be taken from him
00:45:47.240 or his alleged
00:45:48.800 illegal activities.
00:45:50.740 But just hold this
00:45:51.680 in mind.
00:45:52.100 the illegal activity
00:45:54.240 in mind
00:45:54.880 was that
00:45:55.580 he overvalued
00:45:57.100 his properties
00:45:57.920 when he dealt
00:45:58.860 with Deutsche Bank.
00:46:00.440 The Deutsche Bank
00:46:01.340 leaders
00:46:03.560 who testified
00:46:05.520 said that
00:46:06.900 they don't pay
00:46:07.560 attention
00:46:08.000 to the client's
00:46:09.980 estimates.
00:46:10.880 They do their own
00:46:11.640 and that they
00:46:13.800 liked doing business
00:46:14.840 with them
00:46:15.260 and they would do
00:46:15.860 business with them
00:46:16.580 again
00:46:16.860 and they lost
00:46:17.540 no money.
00:46:18.020 Now,
00:46:21.320 have you ever
00:46:21.740 seen anybody
00:46:22.240 go to jail
00:46:22.940 when the victim,
00:46:25.200 the victim
00:46:26.640 says under oath
00:46:28.640 there was no crime?
00:46:31.580 They didn't say
00:46:32.500 that they weren't hurt.
00:46:33.900 They said
00:46:34.300 there was no crime
00:46:35.160 and they're the victim.
00:46:38.820 How in the world
00:46:40.320 does that trial
00:46:42.500 complete
00:46:43.220 when the victim
00:46:45.720 said the crime
00:46:47.140 didn't happen?
00:46:48.020 the fucking
00:46:49.160 victim
00:46:49.760 under oath
00:46:51.340 under oath
00:46:53.200 said the crime
00:46:54.500 didn't happen.
00:46:55.580 Not only did they say
00:46:56.920 the crime didn't happen,
00:46:58.100 they explained
00:46:59.180 completely credibly
00:47:00.640 same thing I told you
00:47:02.300 before they did
00:47:03.040 that it is
00:47:04.360 bank procedure
00:47:05.300 to not pay attention
00:47:07.100 to the customer's
00:47:08.140 estimates
00:47:08.680 because they can
00:47:09.820 never be trusted.
00:47:11.000 So it's not
00:47:11.920 illegal to have
00:47:12.960 a high estimate
00:47:13.920 and give it to a bank
00:47:15.280 because they don't
00:47:16.360 even pay attention
00:47:17.060 to it.
00:47:17.580 they do their own
00:47:19.480 and that's what
00:47:20.680 the bank said
00:47:21.400 and I told you
00:47:22.100 the bank would say
00:47:22.860 that months
00:47:24.000 before they did.
00:47:24.700 now what is the country
00:47:29.600 going to do
00:47:30.280 if Trump
00:47:31.960 is found guilty?
00:47:33.440 Well actually
00:47:34.000 I think he's already
00:47:34.740 found guilty, right?
00:47:36.100 Didn't the judge
00:47:36.740 already rule
00:47:37.420 that he did
00:47:38.540 in fact
00:47:39.060 inflate his asset?
00:47:40.660 Yeah, he's already
00:47:41.120 guilty.
00:47:42.020 So the only decision
00:47:43.040 is what they're going
00:47:43.660 to do about it.
00:47:45.220 Right?
00:47:46.700 What they're going
00:47:47.400 to do about it.
00:47:48.160 And one of the
00:47:49.420 possibilities
00:47:49.940 they would take
00:47:50.580 his business
00:47:51.120 is away from
00:47:51.960 his control
00:47:52.680 in America.
00:47:55.900 In America.
00:47:57.740 So he runs
00:47:58.840 for public office
00:47:59.840 and then he would
00:48:01.180 lose his entire
00:48:02.120 empire
00:48:04.220 or at least
00:48:05.220 the control of it.
00:48:06.160 You'd still have
00:48:06.620 the financial interest.
00:48:08.100 But he'd lose
00:48:08.580 control of it
00:48:09.560 for purely politics.
00:48:12.160 This would be
00:48:14.720 such an injustice.
00:48:20.580 I mean
00:48:21.360 I think Jack Smith
00:48:22.280 would have to
00:48:22.780 increase his security
00:48:23.820 quite a bit
00:48:24.580 if this happens.
00:48:27.160 Because there's
00:48:27.920 nobody who's going
00:48:28.580 to see this
00:48:29.140 as an act of justice
00:48:30.340 if he gets convicted.
00:48:32.600 Well anybody
00:48:33.300 who understands
00:48:34.040 the issue
00:48:34.860 would know
00:48:35.980 it's not justice.
00:48:37.620 So
00:48:38.020 powder keg.
00:48:40.320 We'll see what happens.
00:48:41.220 How about
00:48:42.400 Ukraine money laundering?
00:48:44.080 Do you think
00:48:44.220 we'll find out
00:48:44.740 more about that?
00:48:45.780 Maybe.
00:48:46.980 Do you think
00:48:47.360 we'll find out
00:48:47.960 who is bribing
00:48:48.700 Congress
00:48:49.160 on the asylum
00:48:50.000 question
00:48:50.480 or the TikTok
00:48:51.600 question?
00:48:53.900 Wouldn't you
00:48:54.540 like to have
00:48:54.940 a list of people
00:48:55.720 who are
00:48:56.340 not in favor
00:48:57.620 of changing
00:48:58.340 the asylum process?
00:49:00.400 The asylum
00:49:01.320 process
00:49:01.800 is why
00:49:02.680 Majorca
00:49:03.700 and Biden
00:49:04.280 can say
00:49:04.960 they're doing
00:49:05.340 a good job.
00:49:06.440 Because they're
00:49:07.080 following the law.
00:49:08.500 As long as
00:49:09.360 the people
00:49:09.660 apply for asylum
00:49:10.560 we have to
00:49:11.680 process them
00:49:12.460 as if they're
00:49:13.380 legally in the system.
00:49:15.880 Why don't we
00:49:16.540 change the
00:49:17.060 asylum process?
00:49:18.800 Does anybody
00:49:19.440 know the answer
00:49:20.120 to that?
00:49:21.220 I don't.
00:49:22.880 I have no idea.
00:49:24.420 The only
00:49:24.840 working
00:49:25.800 assumption
00:49:26.700 I have
00:49:27.140 is
00:49:27.380 massive
00:49:28.280 corruption.
00:49:29.620 The only
00:49:30.460 explanation
00:49:31.200 is that
00:49:31.960 Congress
00:49:32.400 has bought
00:49:32.900 off.
00:49:34.580 Let me ask
00:49:35.720 this.
00:49:36.240 Do you
00:49:36.420 think if
00:49:36.760 you did
00:49:37.040 a poll
00:49:37.380 of the
00:49:37.640 public
00:49:38.040 in any
00:49:39.260 state
00:49:39.840 you said
00:49:42.220 asylum is
00:49:43.080 the reason
00:49:43.480 that we
00:49:44.180 have this
00:49:44.500 massive
00:49:44.880 immigration
00:49:45.560 problem?
00:49:46.820 Do you
00:49:47.040 think we
00:49:47.380 should
00:49:47.640 relook at
00:49:48.220 the asylum
00:49:48.740 laws?
00:49:49.680 What do
00:49:49.940 you think
00:49:50.180 an American
00:49:50.700 citizen would
00:49:51.560 say to
00:49:51.840 that question?
00:49:53.760 Oh yeah,
00:49:54.060 of course.
00:49:54.740 Obviously.
00:49:55.500 Yeah,
00:49:55.720 obviously we
00:49:56.380 should relook
00:49:57.520 at the
00:49:57.760 asylum law
00:49:58.460 because it's
00:49:59.320 causing a
00:49:59.780 problem.
00:50:01.020 Why is that
00:50:01.700 not happening?
00:50:02.220 We'll say
00:50:05.660 40%.
00:50:06.420 They don't
00:50:07.660 say 40%.
00:50:08.540 If anybody
00:50:09.360 hears the
00:50:12.080 situation
00:50:12.540 described
00:50:13.460 as the
00:50:15.280 entire
00:50:15.600 source of
00:50:16.260 all the
00:50:16.520 illegal
00:50:16.880 immigration
00:50:17.420 from
00:50:17.920 Africa
00:50:19.280 and the
00:50:20.020 Middle
00:50:20.200 East
00:50:20.500 and China,
00:50:21.860 nobody's
00:50:22.380 going to
00:50:22.520 be in
00:50:22.760 favor of
00:50:23.060 that.
00:50:23.820 Nobody.
00:50:24.420 You
00:50:24.600 probably
00:50:24.860 couldn't
00:50:25.060 even get
00:50:25.340 one
00:50:25.580 person.
00:50:27.400 So if
00:50:28.140 you describe
00:50:28.720 it properly
00:50:29.300 it would
00:50:29.760 be closer
00:50:30.160 to 100%
00:50:30.940 it would
00:50:31.140 be in
00:50:31.880 favor of
00:50:32.200 relooking
00:50:32.860 at it
00:50:33.260 and changing
00:50:33.740 and it
00:50:34.740 doesn't
00:50:34.960 happen.
00:50:36.680 What could
00:50:37.460 the possible
00:50:38.120 reason for
00:50:38.720 that be?
00:50:39.240 Well,
00:50:39.540 corruption.
00:50:40.500 There's no
00:50:40.900 other reason.
00:50:43.720 Here's what
00:50:44.320 I think.
00:50:45.100 I think we
00:50:45.660 should have
00:50:46.040 a percentage
00:50:46.900 that we
00:50:48.520 use as a
00:50:49.240 standard to
00:50:49.940 know when
00:50:50.340 corruption is
00:50:50.940 happening.
00:50:52.340 For example,
00:50:53.280 let's say
00:50:53.600 70%.
00:50:54.460 If there's
00:50:55.660 something that
00:50:56.120 the public
00:50:56.580 understands,
00:50:57.760 they understand
00:50:58.300 the question,
00:50:58.920 it's not
00:50:59.220 complicated,
00:51:00.420 and 70%
00:51:01.360 of the public
00:51:01.820 wants it,
00:51:03.100 and Congress
00:51:03.980 won't do
00:51:04.480 it,
00:51:05.360 I think we
00:51:06.520 just assume
00:51:07.040 it's corruption.
00:51:08.080 If it's
00:51:08.760 50-50,
00:51:10.200 you can
00:51:10.900 kind of
00:51:11.220 understand why
00:51:11.840 things don't
00:51:12.380 get done.
00:51:13.840 Right?
00:51:14.480 You can
00:51:14.800 understand that.
00:51:16.240 But if it's
00:51:16.760 70-30
00:51:17.540 in the public,
00:51:20.620 and let's
00:51:21.740 say there's a
00:51:22.220 majority in
00:51:22.820 both parties,
00:51:24.120 but it's
00:51:24.440 70-30 overall,
00:51:25.640 but a majority
00:51:26.300 in both parties,
00:51:27.160 and it doesn't
00:51:27.560 get done,
00:51:27.960 how can
00:51:29.160 that be
00:51:29.440 explained
00:51:29.780 any other
00:51:30.220 way but
00:51:30.560 corruption?
00:51:31.500 Even
00:51:31.760 incompetence
00:51:32.420 wouldn't get
00:51:32.800 you there,
00:51:33.400 because they
00:51:33.780 do get
00:51:34.200 stuff done,
00:51:35.460 so it's
00:51:36.300 not incompetence,
00:51:37.480 it's got to
00:51:37.860 be intentional.
00:51:39.240 Why?
00:51:40.260 Just corruption.
00:51:42.000 I can't
00:51:42.640 think of
00:51:42.900 another reason.
00:51:43.900 We may
00:51:44.240 find out more
00:51:44.800 about the
00:51:45.160 January 6th
00:51:45.900 hoax,
00:51:46.860 especially the
00:51:47.540 fact that they
00:51:48.060 threw away all
00:51:48.760 their records.
00:51:50.360 Maybe we'll
00:51:50.940 find out if
00:51:51.500 aliens are
00:51:52.180 visiting the
00:51:52.740 earth,
00:51:53.000 or they've
00:51:53.340 always been
00:51:53.720 there.
00:51:53.900 All right,
00:51:56.460 remember I've
00:51:57.180 told you that
00:51:57.820 when I took
00:51:58.760 hypnosis classes,
00:51:59.860 I learned that
00:52:01.480 when people do
00:52:02.120 these so-called
00:52:03.400 Freudian slips,
00:52:05.580 that they do
00:52:07.180 mean something,
00:52:08.180 especially if
00:52:08.840 there's more
00:52:09.260 than one.
00:52:10.520 One could be
00:52:11.560 a mistake,
00:52:12.400 just a slip,
00:52:13.460 but if somebody
00:52:14.020 does the same
00:52:14.560 type of slip
00:52:15.460 over and over
00:52:16.000 again,
00:52:16.320 it's really
00:52:16.740 telling you
00:52:17.180 something.
00:52:18.200 And I saw
00:52:18.700 Kanekoa the
00:52:20.000 Great,
00:52:21.020 in one of his
00:52:21.700 posts,
00:52:22.240 he showed a
00:52:23.200 compilation,
00:52:23.900 video of
00:52:25.520 Biden saying
00:52:26.380 things that
00:52:27.600 probably meant
00:52:28.280 exactly what
00:52:29.020 they said,
00:52:30.180 or exactly
00:52:30.700 what he said.
00:52:31.600 Here are some
00:52:32.140 of the things
00:52:32.440 he has said
00:52:32.880 in public.
00:52:34.420 I don't need
00:52:35.300 you to vote
00:52:35.780 for me.
00:52:39.820 As if the
00:52:40.560 vote wasn't
00:52:41.060 going to matter,
00:52:41.820 like he was
00:52:42.280 going to win,
00:52:42.960 and then he
00:52:43.320 talked about
00:52:43.820 he needs you
00:52:44.460 to help him
00:52:45.080 after he gets
00:52:45.620 elected.
00:52:47.060 He actually
00:52:47.440 said I don't
00:52:47.980 need you to
00:52:48.400 vote for me.
00:52:50.260 Now,
00:52:50.900 he also said
00:52:52.640 that we have
00:52:53.140 the most
00:52:53.520 extensive and
00:52:54.340 inclusive voter
00:52:55.700 fraud organization
00:52:56.780 in American
00:52:57.380 politics.
00:52:58.520 We assume
00:52:59.400 what he
00:52:59.720 intended to
00:53:00.400 mean is we
00:53:01.520 have an
00:53:01.900 anti-fraud
00:53:02.760 organization.
00:53:04.100 But what he
00:53:04.840 said was we
00:53:06.340 have the
00:53:06.700 biggest fraud
00:53:07.460 organization.
00:53:09.320 Now,
00:53:09.760 if that were
00:53:10.340 the only thing
00:53:11.200 he said,
00:53:12.520 again,
00:53:13.080 I'd say,
00:53:13.480 well,
00:53:13.800 he's old,
00:53:15.140 it's just a
00:53:15.680 slip.
00:53:16.300 It's easy to
00:53:17.100 say,
00:53:18.180 you know,
00:53:18.420 to forget
00:53:19.140 the anti.
00:53:20.300 That'd be
00:53:20.660 an easy
00:53:21.100 mistake.
00:53:22.420 But he
00:53:24.040 has also
00:53:24.460 said the
00:53:24.900 following
00:53:25.220 thing a
00:53:25.700 number of
00:53:26.120 times.
00:53:28.620 It only
00:53:29.360 matters who
00:53:29.820 counts the
00:53:30.320 votes.
00:53:31.520 A number
00:53:32.300 of times
00:53:32.920 in public,
00:53:34.140 Joe Biden
00:53:34.640 has said it
00:53:35.380 only matters
00:53:35.980 who counts
00:53:36.500 the votes.
00:53:37.760 Joe Biden
00:53:38.560 said that a
00:53:39.660 number of
00:53:40.140 times in
00:53:41.000 public about
00:53:42.080 the United
00:53:42.600 States,
00:53:43.600 that it only
00:53:44.160 matters who
00:53:44.700 counts the
00:53:45.180 votes.
00:53:45.500 out loud,
00:53:47.400 directly,
00:53:48.620 multiple
00:53:48.940 times.
00:53:50.860 Now,
00:53:51.120 of course,
00:53:51.500 he was
00:53:51.740 doing that
00:53:52.280 when complaining
00:53:53.100 about
00:53:53.460 Republicans,
00:53:54.420 you know,
00:53:54.680 maybe rigging
00:53:55.520 something.
00:53:56.720 And maybe
00:53:57.080 they do.
00:53:57.800 I don't know.
00:53:58.960 But he
00:53:59.920 says it
00:54:00.360 directly.
00:54:02.040 Now,
00:54:02.380 do you
00:54:02.720 think that
00:54:04.620 one person
00:54:05.340 could say
00:54:05.760 this many
00:54:06.340 things without
00:54:07.000 what he's
00:54:09.220 actually thinking?
00:54:10.060 I don't
00:54:10.340 need you to
00:54:10.940 vote for
00:54:11.280 me,
00:54:11.920 most extensive
00:54:12.760 voter fraud
00:54:13.380 organization,
00:54:14.480 and it only
00:54:14.920 matters
00:54:15.300 who counts
00:54:16.100 the votes.
00:54:17.660 That would
00:54:18.260 be a lot
00:54:18.920 of Freudian
00:54:19.880 slips.
00:54:22.040 Yeah,
00:54:22.740 that would
00:54:23.060 be a lot.
00:54:24.720 I'm going
00:54:25.260 to say this
00:54:25.720 is exactly
00:54:26.300 what it
00:54:26.620 looks like.
00:54:27.560 To me,
00:54:28.220 this is Joe
00:54:28.820 Biden being
00:54:29.560 completely aware
00:54:30.500 that the
00:54:30.900 election is
00:54:31.440 rigged,
00:54:32.260 and that it
00:54:32.780 needs to be
00:54:33.240 rigged in
00:54:33.640 his favor
00:54:34.160 in order for
00:54:35.400 him to win.
00:54:36.800 That's what
00:54:37.340 it looks like
00:54:37.780 to me.
00:54:38.640 Can't read
00:54:39.100 his mind,
00:54:40.360 but the
00:54:40.820 signal is
00:54:41.500 unmistakable.
00:54:42.360 I remind
00:54:52.920 you that
00:54:53.420 if you
00:54:53.840 see anything
00:54:54.460 about the
00:54:55.080 Epstein
00:54:55.480 client list
00:54:57.180 or the
00:54:58.740 flight list,
00:54:59.360 it would be
00:54:59.540 because Mike
00:55:00.160 Cernovich
00:55:00.640 retained a
00:55:02.640 lawyer and
00:55:03.380 got that.
00:55:06.160 Cernovich,
00:55:06.980 who had
00:55:07.380 nothing to do
00:55:08.120 with anything
00:55:08.820 to do
00:55:09.260 with Epstein.
00:55:10.660 He was
00:55:11.240 just a
00:55:11.700 concerned
00:55:12.260 citizen who
00:55:13.580 decided we
00:55:14.240 didn't know
00:55:14.640 enough.
00:55:15.600 And the
00:55:16.200 only reason
00:55:16.780 we know
00:55:17.140 anything is
00:55:18.880 because somebody
00:55:19.580 not involved
00:55:20.460 in the
00:55:20.820 government spent
00:55:22.560 his own
00:55:23.040 money to
00:55:24.280 make it
00:55:24.620 happen.
00:55:26.380 It's the
00:55:26.980 only reason
00:55:27.340 we know
00:55:27.640 that.
00:55:28.440 Cernovich
00:55:28.900 did it.
00:55:31.820 Just hold
00:55:32.820 that in your
00:55:33.160 head for a
00:55:33.620 moment.
00:55:35.060 That the
00:55:35.660 only reason
00:55:36.260 we know
00:55:36.600 anything is
00:55:38.680 because a
00:55:39.040 citizen did
00:55:39.620 it.
00:55:40.920 Spent his
00:55:41.340 own money.
00:55:42.740 Wanted to
00:55:43.080 know the
00:55:43.420 truth.
00:55:45.080 Just think
00:55:45.560 about that.
00:55:46.560 It's
00:55:46.860 incredible.
00:55:49.760 All right.
00:55:52.320 There's a
00:55:52.940 new poll for
00:55:53.540 Trump that
00:55:54.060 shows he's
00:55:54.720 leading Biden
00:55:56.520 with Hispanics
00:55:57.460 and young
00:55:57.980 voters.
00:55:59.460 Do you
00:55:59.720 believe that?
00:56:02.120 Do you
00:56:02.640 believe that
00:56:03.060 Trump would
00:56:03.500 actually in
00:56:04.340 a straight
00:56:05.520 up election,
00:56:06.080 do you think
00:56:06.380 he would
00:56:06.600 actually be
00:56:07.360 on Hispanics
00:56:09.420 and young
00:56:10.740 voters?
00:56:12.260 Wouldn't
00:56:12.520 that be
00:56:12.880 the biggest
00:56:14.800 switch around
00:56:16.380 we've ever
00:56:16.920 seen in
00:56:17.420 politics?
00:56:18.920 I'm not
00:56:19.420 sure I
00:56:19.720 believe it
00:56:20.100 yet.
00:56:21.660 Here's the
00:56:22.240 problem with
00:56:22.740 it.
00:56:23.320 I think
00:56:23.980 there's still
00:56:24.420 a lot of
00:56:24.800 undecideds.
00:56:27.000 And I feel
00:56:27.740 like the
00:56:28.040 undecideds
00:56:28.980 probably would
00:56:30.160 go where
00:56:30.520 they've
00:56:30.760 historically
00:56:31.280 gone.
00:56:32.700 So,
00:56:34.200 you know,
00:56:34.600 same in
00:56:34.960 2020?
00:56:35.360 I don't
00:56:37.080 know.
00:56:37.860 The polling
00:56:38.920 is having
00:56:39.420 some big
00:56:39.820 problems in
00:56:41.480 modern times.
00:56:42.580 I don't
00:56:42.800 know if
00:56:43.080 I'm going
00:56:44.340 to believe
00:56:44.660 this yet.
00:56:47.920 But Biden
00:56:48.780 also lost
00:56:49.360 support among
00:56:49.860 black voters.
00:56:52.660 Way down.
00:56:54.560 So,
00:56:55.260 what do
00:56:57.240 you make
00:56:57.480 of this?
00:57:00.320 Mainstream
00:57:00.920 media has
00:57:01.500 been calling
00:57:01.960 Trump a
00:57:02.800 white supremacist
00:57:04.120 and racist.
00:57:05.360 for, what,
00:57:06.560 seven years
00:57:07.240 straight?
00:57:08.220 Just non-stop.
00:57:10.380 And he's
00:57:11.160 actually gaining
00:57:11.960 in the group
00:57:12.840 that he's
00:57:14.000 supposed to
00:57:14.420 be the
00:57:14.840 white supremacist
00:57:15.840 against.
00:57:17.760 What's that
00:57:18.420 all about?
00:57:20.240 It's got to
00:57:20.940 be about
00:57:21.280 capability.
00:57:23.660 It's got to
00:57:24.340 be that people
00:57:24.860 are seeing
00:57:26.280 through the
00:57:26.860 propaganda
00:57:27.400 at this
00:57:27.780 point.
00:57:28.540 If you
00:57:29.180 were Hispanic
00:57:30.040 or black,
00:57:31.900 don't you
00:57:32.300 think you
00:57:32.640 would have
00:57:32.880 noticed that
00:57:33.620 every white
00:57:34.500 person in
00:57:35.040 charge is
00:57:35.480 called a
00:57:35.820 white
00:57:36.000 supremacist?
00:57:37.480 And wouldn't
00:57:37.960 you just
00:57:38.320 start to
00:57:38.820 be blind
00:57:40.180 to it
00:57:40.560 because it's
00:57:41.000 like,
00:57:41.400 it's just
00:57:41.940 what we
00:57:42.220 call everybody.
00:57:44.800 I feel
00:57:45.780 like being
00:57:46.160 called a
00:57:46.580 racist
00:57:46.860 doesn't mean
00:57:47.420 anything
00:57:48.000 in 2024.
00:57:51.020 It just
00:57:51.520 doesn't have
00:57:51.920 anything.
00:57:52.860 It's just
00:57:53.300 empty.
00:57:54.480 There's nothing
00:57:55.040 to it anymore
00:57:55.660 because it's
00:57:56.520 so ridiculous
00:57:57.280 in most cases.
00:58:00.600 It's so
00:58:00.980 ridiculous that
00:58:01.700 you don't even
00:58:02.180 take it
00:58:02.460 seriously.
00:58:04.360 All right.
00:58:04.680 Well,
00:58:04.860 we'll see
00:58:05.120 if that
00:58:05.400 poll holds
00:58:06.720 up.
00:58:14.400 So,
00:58:15.460 Bannon
00:58:16.040 also was
00:58:16.760 talking about
00:58:19.380 how all
00:58:21.300 the Trump
00:58:21.660 supporters
00:58:22.240 are being
00:58:23.000 taken out
00:58:23.520 one by
00:58:23.880 one.
00:58:25.300 And you
00:58:26.160 see it,
00:58:26.560 right?
00:58:27.380 You see
00:58:27.780 anybody who
00:58:28.420 is pro-Trump
00:58:29.200 is being
00:58:29.640 targeted by
00:58:30.360 hit pieces
00:58:30.980 lawsuits and
00:58:33.640 all kinds
00:58:34.020 of stuff.
00:58:35.480 Now,
00:58:36.180 now that
00:58:38.140 you see
00:58:38.520 the larger
00:58:39.140 context,
00:58:41.820 I'm too
00:58:42.520 close to
00:58:43.040 this to
00:58:43.820 be objective.
00:58:46.700 But do
00:58:47.160 you think
00:58:47.520 that me
00:58:48.100 being canceled
00:58:48.860 globally
00:58:49.880 was political
00:58:51.200 or was it
00:58:53.160 really about
00:58:53.700 what I
00:58:54.040 said?
00:58:56.820 How many
00:58:57.480 of you think
00:58:57.840 it was
00:58:58.060 political?
00:58:58.480 Yeah.
00:59:00.980 You may
00:59:03.340 be influenced
00:59:03.920 by me
00:59:04.360 when you
00:59:04.660 say that.
00:59:06.580 Yeah.
00:59:07.080 I think
00:59:07.700 we're all
00:59:08.000 biased on
00:59:08.460 that question.
00:59:10.400 Here's
00:59:10.920 what I
00:59:11.200 think.
00:59:13.440 I think
00:59:14.280 that it's
00:59:15.420 never one
00:59:15.960 thing.
00:59:17.300 Most
00:59:17.720 things are
00:59:18.140 complicated.
00:59:19.280 So,
00:59:19.560 most things
00:59:20.000 have multiple
00:59:20.800 reasons and
00:59:21.900 multiple
00:59:22.420 variables.
00:59:23.400 So,
00:59:23.640 I don't
00:59:23.780 think it
00:59:24.100 was necessarily
00:59:24.740 completely
00:59:25.360 political.
00:59:26.480 But I
00:59:26.800 don't think
00:59:27.160 I would
00:59:27.440 have been
00:59:27.700 canceled
00:59:28.020 worldwide
00:59:28.660 unless I
00:59:30.500 had been
00:59:30.800 speaking
00:59:31.160 politically
00:59:31.660 for a
00:59:32.100 long time.
00:59:33.480 Do you?
00:59:34.560 Do you
00:59:35.080 think I
00:59:35.360 would have
00:59:35.540 been
00:59:35.740 canceled
00:59:36.140 had I
00:59:38.040 not been
00:59:38.580 a political
00:59:39.220 voice?
00:59:41.680 I don't
00:59:42.280 think so.
00:59:43.420 Because for
00:59:43.780 one thing,
00:59:44.200 you never
00:59:44.520 even would
00:59:45.020 have known
00:59:45.280 about it.
00:59:47.260 Right?
00:59:47.740 If I
00:59:48.340 were not
00:59:48.720 somebody who
00:59:49.300 talked about
00:59:49.720 politics all
00:59:50.440 the time,
00:59:51.700 nobody would
00:59:52.320 have even
00:59:52.820 tweeted around
00:59:54.000 the video.
00:59:55.340 Nobody would
00:59:55.720 even know
00:59:56.060 about it.
00:59:56.560 China got
00:59:58.740 me.
00:59:59.780 Maybe.
01:00:00.720 But I
01:00:01.000 think the
01:00:01.300 fact that
01:00:01.660 the Washington
01:00:02.180 Post was
01:00:02.880 leading it
01:00:03.520 is not a
01:00:05.800 coincidence.
01:00:07.140 Now,
01:00:07.360 there's also
01:00:07.760 a business
01:00:08.460 element to
01:00:09.140 it.
01:00:09.900 Because I've
01:00:10.620 been a
01:00:10.880 critic of
01:00:11.340 the Washington
01:00:11.760 Post long
01:00:12.520 before they
01:00:13.000 canceled me.
01:00:13.800 So they
01:00:14.220 were paying
01:00:14.660 me while I
01:00:15.200 was criticizing
01:00:15.860 them.
01:00:16.480 That wasn't
01:00:16.960 going to
01:00:17.160 last.
01:00:19.440 Let me
01:00:20.300 tell you,
01:00:20.720 the least
01:00:21.420 surprising
01:00:22.100 thing was
01:00:23.260 the Washington
01:00:23.740 Post
01:00:24.080 canceling me.
01:00:25.040 Because I've
01:00:25.400 been calling
01:00:25.760 them shit
01:00:26.280 for years.
01:00:28.940 And they
01:00:29.260 are.
01:00:29.460 They're just
01:00:29.780 complete garbage,
01:00:30.860 the Washington
01:00:31.200 Post.
01:00:32.420 So that's
01:00:33.120 not a
01:00:33.380 surprise.
01:00:35.100 Yeah, so
01:00:35.380 that's a
01:00:35.680 political
01:00:35.980 dimension.
01:00:40.500 And just
01:00:42.620 imagine
01:00:43.080 somebody saying
01:00:44.200 this even a
01:00:44.920 few years
01:00:45.480 ago.
01:00:46.200 Here's
01:00:46.540 Vivek
01:00:47.020 Ramaswamy.
01:00:48.300 He was
01:00:48.600 talking about
01:00:49.080 Claudine
01:00:49.520 Gay, the
01:00:50.020 president of
01:00:50.520 Harvard.
01:00:50.760 Harvard, and
01:00:51.540 you ask
01:00:52.040 yourself, could
01:00:53.340 any major
01:00:54.020 candidate for
01:00:54.940 office have
01:00:56.200 said this
01:00:57.100 even a few
01:00:58.180 years ago?
01:00:59.580 To see how
01:01:00.320 things have
01:01:00.700 changed.
01:01:01.720 So this is
01:01:02.380 Vivek Ramaswamy.
01:01:04.400 Claudine
01:01:04.880 Gay raises a
01:01:05.740 problem for
01:01:06.220 Harvard that
01:01:07.500 Kamala raises
01:01:08.420 for the
01:01:08.900 Democrats.
01:01:10.780 Uh-oh.
01:01:12.120 Uh-oh.
01:01:14.640 Are you already
01:01:16.180 a little bit
01:01:16.700 worried for him?
01:01:17.940 Uh-oh.
01:01:18.320 Where's he
01:01:18.880 going with
01:01:19.240 this?
01:01:20.080 Yeah, so
01:01:20.920 Claudine
01:01:21.520 Gay raises
01:01:23.600 the problem
01:01:23.980 for Harvard
01:01:24.320 and the
01:01:24.500 Kamala raises
01:01:25.060 for the
01:01:25.440 Democrats.
01:01:26.240 When someone
01:01:26.740 got the job
01:01:27.500 based on race
01:01:28.360 and gender,
01:01:29.560 it becomes
01:01:30.080 impossible to
01:01:31.000 fire them.
01:01:32.580 The Supreme
01:01:33.540 Court ended
01:01:34.120 affirmative action
01:01:35.060 in college
01:01:35.540 admissions.
01:01:36.580 Now time to
01:01:37.360 end it in
01:01:38.080 university hiring.
01:01:40.880 Wow.
01:01:45.260 Yeah.
01:01:46.660 He says it
01:01:47.200 directly.
01:01:48.320 That Kamala
01:01:49.560 and Claudine
01:01:50.800 Gay are
01:01:51.240 diversity
01:01:51.860 hires, and
01:01:53.040 if you do
01:01:53.400 diversity
01:01:53.960 hire, you
01:01:55.140 can't fire
01:01:55.680 them.
01:01:57.360 He says
01:01:58.040 that's what
01:01:58.380 we're seeing.
01:01:59.640 Oh, my
01:02:00.120 God.
01:02:01.200 Now, am I
01:02:01.720 wrong?
01:02:02.100 You couldn't
01:02:02.520 really say
01:02:03.120 that.
01:02:03.540 If you
01:02:03.840 were a
01:02:04.060 major
01:02:04.300 candidate,
01:02:05.400 you couldn't
01:02:05.840 really say
01:02:06.280 that three
01:02:06.760 years ago,
01:02:07.380 could you?
01:02:08.960 You'd be
01:02:09.620 canceled.
01:02:11.360 Will he be
01:02:12.400 canceled?
01:02:13.020 No.
01:02:15.320 So what
01:02:16.320 has changed?
01:02:18.320 Let me
01:02:19.820 ask you,
01:02:20.300 what has
01:02:20.560 changed?
01:02:22.060 Why can
01:02:22.800 we say
01:02:23.140 this out
01:02:23.540 loud now?
01:02:25.460 What
01:02:26.000 changed?
01:02:29.980 Well, some
01:02:30.960 of it is
01:02:31.760 people like
01:02:32.640 me who
01:02:34.060 are just
01:02:34.800 unwilling to
01:02:35.520 be censored
01:02:36.200 at any
01:02:36.880 cost.
01:02:37.800 So there's
01:02:38.480 some of
01:02:38.720 that.
01:02:38.940 some of
01:02:42.320 it is
01:02:42.580 leadership,
01:02:43.700 accidental as
01:02:45.260 well as
01:02:45.640 intentional.
01:02:46.520 In
01:02:46.640 Vivek's
01:02:47.140 case, it's
01:02:47.660 intentional.
01:02:49.260 He's
01:02:49.700 showing
01:02:50.180 leadership,
01:02:51.560 so it
01:02:52.040 makes it
01:02:52.380 safer for
01:02:52.860 you.
01:02:53.420 In other
01:02:53.780 cases, people
01:02:54.460 showed
01:02:54.780 leadership
01:02:55.240 accidentally.
01:02:57.520 I guess that
01:02:58.180 would be the
01:02:58.560 case for me.
01:02:59.620 I wasn't
01:03:00.060 trying to
01:03:00.740 show you
01:03:01.040 any
01:03:01.240 leadership.
01:03:01.640 It worked
01:03:03.380 out that
01:03:03.760 way.
01:03:04.020 But I
01:03:06.840 think that
01:03:07.300 people are
01:03:08.020 fed up.
01:03:08.840 I think
01:03:09.180 that the
01:03:09.720 immigration
01:03:11.440 feels
01:03:13.860 different when
01:03:15.300 it's no
01:03:15.680 longer our
01:03:16.300 neighbors.
01:03:18.100 Because the
01:03:18.440 way I feel
01:03:18.980 about my
01:03:19.440 neighbors,
01:03:21.040 Mexico and
01:03:22.000 Central
01:03:22.800 America, is
01:03:23.900 really, really
01:03:24.660 different than
01:03:25.800 I feel about
01:03:26.340 somebody who
01:03:26.880 flew from
01:03:27.360 the other
01:03:27.660 side of the
01:03:28.020 world.
01:03:29.040 I just have
01:03:29.680 a better
01:03:30.100 feeling about
01:03:30.720 my neighbors,
01:03:31.780 period.
01:03:32.060 So, some
01:03:34.360 of it is
01:03:34.740 immigration, some
01:03:35.640 of it is
01:03:36.060 leadership, some
01:03:37.060 of it is
01:03:37.720 Vivek, some
01:03:39.520 of it is
01:03:40.020 people just
01:03:40.560 have it, some
01:03:41.560 of it is
01:03:42.260 just too
01:03:43.700 far.
01:03:45.480 Yeah, hashtag
01:03:46.260 too far.
01:03:46.900 I think that's
01:03:47.320 really the
01:03:47.740 thing that
01:03:48.160 explains it
01:03:48.740 most.
01:03:51.620 Well, Qatar
01:03:53.760 mediators,
01:03:54.980 Qatar if you
01:03:55.740 prefer, they
01:03:57.700 think they have
01:03:58.220 some agreement
01:03:58.820 in principle
01:03:59.420 to have a
01:04:00.420 one month
01:04:02.640 ceasefire and
01:04:04.540 get 40
01:04:05.120 hostages
01:04:05.660 back.
01:04:07.420 What do you
01:04:08.080 think of
01:04:08.340 that?
01:04:11.020 Do you
01:04:11.700 think a
01:04:12.060 one month
01:04:12.640 ceasefire to
01:04:13.740 get 40
01:04:14.220 hostages
01:04:14.740 back a good
01:04:16.400 deal?
01:04:18.180 You know, I
01:04:18.680 would have
01:04:19.100 said no
01:04:20.000 earlier in
01:04:22.140 the war,
01:04:22.800 but at this
01:04:23.880 point, Israel
01:04:24.600 has such a
01:04:25.520 control over
01:04:26.740 the area and
01:04:27.340 they've destroyed
01:04:27.960 so much, would
01:04:30.560 a month
01:04:31.380 actually help
01:04:32.040 Hamas or
01:04:32.680 would they
01:04:33.020 just starve
01:04:33.840 in a month?
01:04:36.020 Here's the
01:04:36.620 main question.
01:04:38.280 I believe that
01:04:39.320 in the beginning
01:04:40.000 time was on
01:04:41.120 the side of
01:04:41.720 Hamas, because
01:04:43.020 if you gave
01:04:43.500 them some
01:04:43.920 extra time,
01:04:44.560 they could
01:04:44.820 prepare extra
01:04:45.600 good.
01:04:46.720 But once
01:04:47.340 they've been
01:04:47.760 degraded to
01:04:48.600 a certain
01:04:49.000 point, and
01:04:50.500 presumably
01:04:50.940 they'd be
01:04:51.400 running out
01:04:51.880 of food and
01:04:53.020 water and
01:04:53.800 ammunition and
01:04:54.580 everything,
01:04:54.820 once they're
01:04:56.180 running out
01:04:56.700 of stuff, and
01:04:57.920 there's not
01:04:58.320 any easy way
01:04:59.020 to get new
01:04:59.540 stuff in,
01:05:00.320 because I'm
01:05:00.660 sure it's
01:05:01.940 tight, then
01:05:05.000 can you afford
01:05:05.820 to take a
01:05:06.360 month?
01:05:07.440 Because what
01:05:07.980 is Hamas
01:05:08.440 going to do
01:05:08.860 in a month?
01:05:11.560 They're not
01:05:12.080 going to get
01:05:12.420 any new
01:05:12.760 supplies.
01:05:14.980 They're not
01:05:15.360 going to,
01:05:16.560 what are they
01:05:16.940 going to,
01:05:17.160 they're going
01:05:17.440 to be in
01:05:17.680 their tunnel
01:05:18.060 for another
01:05:18.500 month.
01:05:19.600 I mean, at
01:05:19.920 this point,
01:05:20.280 you could just
01:05:20.620 leave them in
01:05:21.080 the tunnel,
01:05:21.640 couldn't you?
01:05:23.380 You know, and
01:05:23.860 little by
01:05:24.800 little, you
01:05:25.380 find out
01:05:26.300 where the
01:05:26.620 tunnel
01:05:26.860 entries are,
01:05:27.840 and, you
01:05:28.520 know, maybe,
01:05:30.440 let me propose
01:05:33.100 this.
01:05:34.160 If you had a
01:05:34.980 ceasefire, does
01:05:37.100 that mean that
01:05:37.800 the IDF, the
01:05:39.320 Israeli forces,
01:05:40.760 would have
01:05:41.280 easier access
01:05:42.560 to look for
01:05:43.840 tunnel openings
01:05:44.700 and search
01:05:46.500 around for
01:05:46.980 their targets
01:05:47.580 if nobody's
01:05:49.180 shooting at
01:05:49.640 them as
01:05:49.900 they're walking
01:05:50.280 down the
01:05:50.720 street?
01:05:52.620 Now, I
01:05:52.980 don't imagine,
01:05:53.400 I can't
01:05:53.800 even imagine
01:05:54.220 how you
01:05:54.540 could have
01:05:54.800 a ceasefire.
01:05:55.820 Does anybody
01:05:56.280 think a
01:05:56.720 ceasefire would
01:05:57.340 hold for a
01:05:57.860 month?
01:05:59.760 Who thinks
01:06:00.520 a ceasefire
01:06:01.060 would hold
01:06:01.420 for a
01:06:01.720 month?
01:06:03.540 I don't.
01:06:05.180 I think
01:06:05.620 it, you
01:06:06.160 know, two
01:06:06.980 hour stops.
01:06:08.640 But here's
01:06:10.720 the question.
01:06:11.280 If you're
01:06:12.220 tempted to
01:06:13.120 say that
01:06:14.700 Israel would
01:06:15.340 be giving
01:06:15.740 away a
01:06:16.360 military
01:06:16.840 advantage by
01:06:17.820 pausing,
01:06:19.380 I'm not so
01:06:20.600 sure.
01:06:20.840 that was
01:06:22.280 definitely
01:06:22.600 true in
01:06:22.960 the beginning.
01:06:23.520 It would
01:06:23.780 have been a
01:06:24.120 military
01:06:24.460 advantage to
01:06:25.120 give away.
01:06:26.140 But now?
01:06:27.900 I don't
01:06:28.520 think that
01:06:29.080 watching from
01:06:30.100 the outside
01:06:30.600 we have
01:06:31.060 enough
01:06:31.340 information.
01:06:33.240 But I
01:06:33.560 suspect that
01:06:35.200 Israel could
01:06:36.300 maybe wait a
01:06:37.300 month without
01:06:38.440 losing too
01:06:39.120 much.
01:06:39.460 And if they
01:06:39.840 got some
01:06:40.200 hostages back,
01:06:41.160 it's a win.
01:06:41.580 So I'm
01:06:43.900 tentatively
01:06:44.600 mildly in
01:06:45.920 favor of
01:06:46.600 this.
01:06:49.380 But I'm
01:06:50.280 very skeptical
01:06:51.040 that anybody
01:06:51.760 would agree to
01:06:52.400 a one-month
01:06:52.940 ceasefire.
01:06:54.340 Seems like
01:06:54.860 fake news.
01:06:56.500 Doesn't it?
01:06:57.940 Why do you
01:06:58.440 need a month?
01:07:00.920 What's a
01:07:01.580 month by you?
01:07:03.420 Why can't
01:07:03.880 you do it
01:07:04.240 in a week?
01:07:06.160 I don't know.
01:07:07.080 Speaking of
01:07:07.680 Netanyahu, his
01:07:08.580 popularity is
01:07:09.400 down to 15%,
01:07:11.260 1-5, in
01:07:12.660 Israel.
01:07:14.780 That's how
01:07:15.380 many want him
01:07:15.880 to keep his
01:07:16.340 job after
01:07:16.920 Gaza.
01:07:17.480 But weirdly,
01:07:18.160 his Gaza
01:07:18.560 policies are
01:07:19.260 popular.
01:07:20.460 Now, have
01:07:20.740 you ever seen
01:07:21.200 that before?
01:07:22.480 Have you ever
01:07:22.920 seen a country
01:07:23.620 go to war and
01:07:24.540 their leader
01:07:25.560 became less
01:07:26.500 popular?
01:07:29.580 So Israel
01:07:30.540 is attacked
01:07:31.380 and their
01:07:32.820 leader, who
01:07:33.360 they say is
01:07:33.940 doing apparently
01:07:34.820 a good job
01:07:35.700 of the
01:07:36.660 response,
01:07:37.780 and he's
01:07:39.000 less popular?
01:07:40.620 What is
01:07:41.200 going on
01:07:41.640 here?
01:07:42.220 How does
01:07:42.480 that make
01:07:42.780 sense?
01:07:44.020 How do you
01:07:44.400 get less
01:07:44.920 popular by
01:07:45.660 doing a
01:07:46.100 good job
01:07:46.720 in a
01:07:47.800 national
01:07:48.220 emergency?
01:07:51.280 I feel
01:07:51.960 like maybe
01:07:52.340 the data
01:07:52.840 is wrong.
01:07:54.660 Like maybe
01:07:55.180 it's the
01:07:55.540 way they
01:07:55.840 asked the
01:07:56.240 question?
01:07:57.920 Something like
01:07:58.360 that?
01:07:59.800 I don't know.
01:08:00.360 Maybe a
01:08:00.720 TikTok thing?
01:08:02.480 Speaking of
01:08:03.160 TikTok,
01:08:04.660 so I,
01:08:05.640 as you know,
01:08:06.540 I don't
01:08:07.060 use TikTok
01:08:07.580 for the
01:08:08.740 obvious reasons
01:08:09.520 because it's
01:08:10.800 a Chinese
01:08:11.340 propaganda
01:08:11.900 machine,
01:08:12.520 but a lot
01:08:13.480 of the
01:08:13.680 TikTok
01:08:13.900 videos end
01:08:14.920 up on
01:08:16.180 other sites
01:08:16.840 after the
01:08:17.840 fact.
01:08:19.100 Have you
01:08:19.880 ever gone
01:08:20.320 down the
01:08:20.920 rabbit hole
01:08:21.720 of the
01:08:22.540 anti-Israel
01:08:24.400 argument?
01:08:27.840 So I
01:08:28.780 ended up,
01:08:29.520 I guess the
01:08:29.980 algorithm decided
01:08:30.900 to feed me
01:08:31.540 anti-Israel
01:08:32.220 stuff yesterday.
01:08:32.940 So I saw
01:08:33.900 more anti-Israel
01:08:34.960 stuff yesterday
01:08:35.780 than I've
01:08:36.920 seen since
01:08:37.860 the beginning
01:08:38.220 of the war.
01:08:39.580 Every bit
01:08:40.320 of it had
01:08:41.480 a TikTok
01:08:41.920 label on
01:08:42.680 it.
01:08:44.000 Let me
01:08:44.540 say that
01:08:44.920 again.
01:08:45.720 I've seen
01:08:46.140 more anti-Israel
01:08:47.300 propaganda in
01:08:48.440 the last 48
01:08:49.460 hours, I
01:08:49.940 guess, than
01:08:50.860 everything put
01:08:52.100 together before
01:08:52.740 that.
01:08:54.040 All of it
01:08:54.880 had a TikTok
01:08:55.580 label on
01:08:56.260 it.
01:08:56.540 In other
01:08:56.780 words, it
01:08:57.080 started in
01:08:57.640 TikTok and
01:08:58.260 ended up
01:08:58.760 where I
01:08:59.080 saw it.
01:09:01.220 Now,
01:09:01.700 there's
01:09:02.960 one thing
01:09:03.400 that both
01:09:04.020 the pro-Israel
01:09:06.120 and the
01:09:06.740 anti-Israel
01:09:07.440 propaganda
01:09:08.080 have in
01:09:08.580 common.
01:09:09.880 And it's
01:09:10.560 maddening.
01:09:12.120 It's
01:09:12.420 maddening.
01:09:13.640 They both
01:09:14.260 ignore the
01:09:15.100 other side
01:09:15.640 of the
01:09:15.840 argument when
01:09:16.700 they make
01:09:17.060 their argument.
01:09:18.700 So I
01:09:19.180 actually listened
01:09:19.880 to somebody
01:09:20.520 talking to
01:09:22.020 a Palestinian
01:09:23.420 citizen who
01:09:25.600 was complaining
01:09:26.260 that her
01:09:26.660 house was
01:09:27.320 bulldozed
01:09:27.980 and that 26
01:09:29.600 other houses
01:09:30.360 had been
01:09:30.860 bulldozed
01:09:31.440 around the
01:09:32.220 same time.
01:09:34.840 Isn't there
01:09:35.300 like a
01:09:35.660 follow-up
01:09:36.160 question to
01:09:36.780 that?
01:09:38.560 It was in
01:09:39.320 a documentary
01:09:39.900 I saw.
01:09:40.820 Isn't there
01:09:41.220 a follow-up
01:09:41.740 question like,
01:09:43.220 was there
01:09:44.000 any reason
01:09:44.500 for that?
01:09:46.400 They don't
01:09:47.120 bulldoze
01:09:48.620 houses
01:09:49.020 randomly.
01:09:50.400 They
01:09:50.880 bulldoze
01:09:51.360 your house
01:09:51.780 because somebody
01:09:52.560 in the house
01:09:53.060 was a
01:09:53.440 terrorist,
01:09:54.960 according to
01:09:55.580 Israel.
01:09:56.340 Now, that
01:09:56.700 doesn't mean
01:09:57.080 they're going
01:09:57.340 to be right
01:09:57.740 every time.
01:09:58.620 It doesn't
01:09:59.000 mean that I
01:09:59.440 necessarily support
01:10:00.480 what they're
01:10:00.780 doing.
01:10:01.020 I'm just
01:10:01.760 saying that
01:10:02.880 if you're
01:10:03.200 complaining about
01:10:03.840 your house
01:10:04.340 getting bulldozed
01:10:05.360 and you don't
01:10:06.580 at least say a
01:10:07.280 few words about
01:10:08.060 maybe why they
01:10:08.820 did it,
01:10:09.800 that's not a
01:10:10.960 documentary.
01:10:12.000 That's bullshit.
01:10:13.400 That's some
01:10:14.060 bullshit right
01:10:14.640 there.
01:10:16.400 Likewise,
01:10:17.520 when Israel
01:10:18.520 says,
01:10:19.500 hey,
01:10:20.580 you know,
01:10:21.020 we let the
01:10:22.040 Palestinians,
01:10:23.240 you know,
01:10:23.520 determine their
01:10:24.120 own future
01:10:24.700 and all that,
01:10:25.800 and they leave
01:10:26.560 out what life
01:10:28.880 is like for the
01:10:29.700 average Palestinian.
01:10:31.580 Well,
01:10:32.320 that's just
01:10:32.780 bullshit propaganda
01:10:33.880 too.
01:10:35.560 So the
01:10:36.280 argument that I
01:10:37.160 was hearing
01:10:37.640 from the
01:10:38.860 anti-Israel
01:10:39.520 ones is,
01:10:40.540 if you had
01:10:41.580 lived the way
01:10:42.420 the Palestinians
01:10:43.140 live,
01:10:44.900 could you
01:10:45.720 imagine that
01:10:46.380 you might also
01:10:47.280 become,
01:10:47.900 or it's
01:10:48.480 easier to
01:10:48.980 imagine somebody
01:10:49.640 would become a
01:10:50.580 suicide bomber
01:10:51.740 because they
01:10:53.120 have no hope.
01:10:53.800 Now,
01:10:55.120 the anti-Israel
01:10:55.940 propaganda
01:10:56.960 was trying
01:10:59.500 to push
01:10:59.940 the position
01:11:00.660 that if you
01:11:01.940 made the
01:11:02.480 Palestinians
01:11:03.140 prosperous and
01:11:04.600 healthy,
01:11:05.180 they would have
01:11:06.180 no reason to
01:11:06.920 attack Israel
01:11:07.660 and then your
01:11:08.320 problem would be
01:11:09.020 solved.
01:11:10.040 And therefore,
01:11:10.800 logically,
01:11:12.100 all of Israel's
01:11:13.300 problems are
01:11:13.960 caused by Israel,
01:11:15.420 say the
01:11:15.760 propagandists,
01:11:17.120 because Israel
01:11:18.000 is doing the
01:11:18.600 thing that
01:11:19.660 makes the
01:11:20.100 Palestinians
01:11:20.640 miserable,
01:11:21.340 and it's
01:11:22.840 the misery
01:11:23.300 that caused
01:11:23.840 them to
01:11:24.160 become terrorists.
01:11:25.080 Therefore,
01:11:25.460 it's really
01:11:25.820 all Israel's
01:11:26.540 fault.
01:11:27.320 Is there
01:11:27.600 anything left
01:11:28.180 out of that
01:11:28.620 story?
01:11:30.820 Yes.
01:11:31.900 What is left
01:11:32.840 out is if the
01:11:33.920 Palestinians were
01:11:34.820 prosperous and
01:11:35.640 healthy,
01:11:36.340 they would still
01:11:36.880 want to
01:11:37.380 destroy Israel.
01:11:39.820 It wouldn't
01:11:40.500 be any
01:11:40.820 different.
01:11:42.740 It is also
01:11:44.220 true that
01:11:46.080 their lives
01:11:46.720 are a struggle
01:11:47.500 in many ways.
01:11:49.960 But it's
01:11:50.660 not true that
01:11:51.260 if you fixed
01:11:51.840 it, there's
01:11:52.800 any evidence
01:11:53.660 whatsoever,
01:11:55.120 any evidence,
01:11:56.040 there's not
01:11:56.420 even a hint
01:11:57.040 that it would
01:11:57.720 make any
01:11:58.100 difference at
01:11:58.540 all, because
01:12:00.200 the children
01:12:01.080 are being
01:12:02.060 taught to
01:12:02.860 kill the
01:12:03.680 Jews and
01:12:04.360 the Zionists
01:12:05.520 are all
01:12:05.820 bad.
01:12:07.420 If they
01:12:08.840 start making
01:12:09.340 more money,
01:12:09.960 they're not
01:12:10.240 going to stop
01:12:11.200 thinking they
01:12:11.820 need to do
01:12:12.280 that stuff.
01:12:13.320 Now, it
01:12:13.740 might be
01:12:14.080 harder to
01:12:14.800 recruit a
01:12:16.800 suicide bomber.
01:12:18.300 It might be
01:12:18.780 harder.
01:12:19.080 But didn't
01:12:21.260 those, correct
01:12:23.420 me if I'm
01:12:23.940 wrong, but
01:12:25.440 weren't the
01:12:26.020 9-11
01:12:26.740 suicide
01:12:28.380 hijackers,
01:12:30.360 weren't they
01:12:30.880 Saudi, some
01:12:32.000 of them or
01:12:32.420 all of them?
01:12:33.020 How many of
01:12:33.420 them were
01:12:33.620 Saudi residents?
01:12:35.940 Yeah.
01:12:36.700 They didn't
01:12:37.500 even come from
01:12:38.420 a country where
01:12:39.920 everybody's abused,
01:12:41.380 at least in
01:12:42.040 that way.
01:12:42.460 the other
01:12:48.240 thing that
01:12:48.760 is a real
01:12:49.860 tell, is
01:12:51.420 that when
01:12:51.740 you hear the
01:12:52.460 complaints of
01:12:54.300 the Palestinians,
01:12:55.760 they actually
01:12:56.760 sound, if you
01:12:57.840 were to take
01:12:58.240 them out of
01:12:58.720 context, and
01:13:00.000 you didn't
01:13:00.320 know why
01:13:00.920 things were
01:13:01.540 the way they
01:13:01.940 were, it
01:13:02.660 does sound
01:13:03.100 pretty bad.
01:13:04.640 Like their
01:13:05.300 inability to
01:13:07.440 use roads,
01:13:09.540 their lack
01:13:10.460 of access to
01:13:11.220 as much
01:13:11.640 water, those
01:13:13.060 are real
01:13:13.400 things.
01:13:14.700 But you
01:13:14.940 know what?
01:13:16.000 You know what
01:13:16.460 is very much
01:13:17.040 like Black
01:13:17.540 Lives Matter?
01:13:19.980 Some of you
01:13:20.720 remember that
01:13:21.380 in the early
01:13:21.860 Black Lives
01:13:22.480 Matter days, I
01:13:24.020 was hearing
01:13:24.460 complaints that
01:13:25.280 I thought, you
01:13:25.740 know what?
01:13:26.700 Some of those
01:13:27.480 complaints sound
01:13:28.220 like things
01:13:28.720 everybody would
01:13:29.320 agree with.
01:13:30.620 Like, let's
01:13:31.720 have less
01:13:32.280 police brutality.
01:13:34.280 Good.
01:13:34.940 I like that.
01:13:36.200 And how
01:13:36.620 about maybe
01:13:37.260 we get
01:13:37.600 everybody, you
01:13:38.600 know, we
01:13:39.060 help fund
01:13:39.660 police camps.
01:13:40.660 So they
01:13:41.360 have body
01:13:41.760 cams.
01:13:42.720 That's good
01:13:43.420 for everybody.
01:13:44.340 Removes any
01:13:44.940 questions about
01:13:45.660 what happened.
01:13:47.080 So I thought
01:13:47.720 to myself, hey,
01:13:49.180 maybe I can be
01:13:50.240 useful.
01:13:50.880 I'll help Black
01:13:51.440 Lives Matter
01:13:51.980 get what they're
01:13:52.760 asking for,
01:13:54.160 because that
01:13:55.240 sounds reasonable
01:13:55.840 to me.
01:13:57.200 And then I
01:13:57.680 learned that
01:13:58.480 Black Lives Matter
01:13:59.200 didn't really have
01:14:00.080 any interest in
01:14:00.740 solutions.
01:14:02.300 Yeah, that's a
01:14:03.080 longer story.
01:14:04.060 But trust me
01:14:04.880 when I say
01:14:05.540 I'm not guessing
01:14:07.340 that they had
01:14:08.460 no interest
01:14:09.040 in solutions.
01:14:10.220 I found it
01:14:10.780 out the hard
01:14:11.240 way.
01:14:11.860 They had no
01:14:12.360 interest in
01:14:12.980 solutions whatsoever.
01:14:14.840 And I think
01:14:15.760 that the
01:14:16.620 Palestinians have
01:14:17.340 the same
01:14:17.620 problem.
01:14:18.860 If Black
01:14:19.680 Lives Matter
01:14:20.280 had started
01:14:20.920 with, let's
01:14:21.500 say, a
01:14:22.700 list of
01:14:23.220 three to
01:14:23.680 five reasonable
01:14:25.560 sounding demands
01:14:26.940 and said
01:14:28.480 from the
01:14:28.880 beginning, this
01:14:29.540 is the stuff
01:14:30.120 we want.
01:14:31.060 We want
01:14:31.660 these five
01:14:32.220 things.
01:14:32.960 I think they
01:14:33.720 would have
01:14:33.940 found a lot
01:14:34.440 of support.
01:14:34.960 I might
01:14:36.680 have been
01:14:36.880 one of
01:14:37.200 them, you
01:14:38.580 know, if
01:14:38.820 there were
01:14:39.100 five reasonable
01:14:39.860 things.
01:14:42.320 But where,
01:14:43.460 have you ever
01:14:44.040 seen the
01:14:44.460 Palestinians put
01:14:45.440 together their,
01:14:46.860 you know, their
01:14:47.940 list of the
01:14:49.080 five reasonable
01:14:50.420 things they
01:14:51.020 want to live
01:14:52.980 good lives?
01:14:54.800 Of course
01:14:55.380 not.
01:14:56.320 Because they're
01:14:57.380 not really
01:14:58.040 dealing on
01:14:58.860 the I want
01:14:59.520 some reasonable
01:15:00.280 compromise
01:15:01.160 level.
01:15:02.280 They want
01:15:02.720 to kill
01:15:03.620 all the Jews
01:15:04.320 and,
01:15:04.960 take over
01:15:05.540 the land
01:15:06.060 and satisfy
01:15:07.580 their dead
01:15:08.060 ancestors and
01:15:09.080 all that
01:15:09.880 stuff.
01:15:11.540 So, here's
01:15:12.740 the thing you
01:15:13.100 need to know
01:15:13.480 about all the
01:15:13.940 propaganda from
01:15:14.740 either the
01:15:15.380 pro or
01:15:15.960 anti-Israel
01:15:16.600 side.
01:15:17.280 It always
01:15:17.920 leaves out
01:15:18.440 the other
01:15:18.960 side's
01:15:20.260 position.
01:15:21.700 So, it's
01:15:22.320 all just
01:15:22.640 useless
01:15:23.000 bullshit.
01:15:24.220 And that's
01:15:24.640 why I say
01:15:25.360 you can talk
01:15:27.680 all day about
01:15:28.360 how things
01:15:28.820 should be
01:15:29.320 and what
01:15:30.580 people should
01:15:31.100 do.
01:15:32.080 It's useless.
01:15:33.700 It's pure
01:15:34.360 power.
01:15:35.960 The Middle
01:15:37.360 East is
01:15:37.960 just power
01:15:38.680 and nobody
01:15:40.040 does anything
01:15:40.740 because that's
01:15:41.520 the right
01:15:41.800 thing to
01:15:42.160 do.
01:15:42.920 It's just
01:15:43.860 brainwashing
01:15:44.540 and power
01:15:45.000 and that's
01:15:46.180 the whole
01:15:46.460 story.
01:15:47.460 So, you
01:15:47.680 don't even
01:15:48.000 need to be
01:15:48.420 in favor
01:15:48.920 of anything
01:15:49.420 or against
01:15:49.900 anything.
01:15:50.920 It's just
01:15:51.600 power.
01:15:53.020 So, those
01:15:53.600 with power
01:15:54.140 will control
01:15:54.760 the land.
01:15:55.640 If that
01:15:56.240 changes and
01:15:57.140 somebody else
01:15:57.620 has the
01:15:57.940 power,
01:15:58.920 they will
01:15:59.500 take that
01:15:59.940 land.
01:16:01.140 That's
01:16:01.620 your future.
01:16:02.440 people want
01:16:11.540 to disrupt
01:16:12.820 the Western
01:16:13.580 prescribed
01:16:14.500 nuclear family.
01:16:15.480 Yeah, I've
01:16:16.060 heard that.
01:16:17.300 They're doing
01:16:17.640 a good job.
01:16:18.860 But I also
01:16:19.580 think that the
01:16:20.380 nuclear family
01:16:21.380 is a
01:16:22.260 historical relic
01:16:24.080 that will
01:16:25.520 never satisfy
01:16:26.500 75% of the
01:16:27.680 public.
01:16:28.700 25% is
01:16:29.580 perfect.
01:16:29.880 but 75%
01:16:32.220 it just
01:16:33.040 won't work.
01:16:34.620 So, we need
01:16:35.340 some kind of
01:16:35.780 a better model
01:16:36.380 for that.
01:16:36.800 But that's
01:16:36.980 another story.
01:16:38.040 Hey, everybody
01:16:38.640 on YouTube,
01:16:39.300 thanks for
01:16:39.680 joining.
01:16:40.600 And I'll
01:16:41.520 see you in
01:16:42.060 the morning
01:16:42.420 tomorrow
01:16:42.920 with more
01:16:44.500 fantastic
01:16:46.000 live streaming.
01:16:47.980 Bye for
01:16:48.540 now.