Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2343 CWSA 01⧸04⧸24 News So Juicy I Can't Mention It In This Title. It's That Good!

00:00:00.000 doo doo doo doo doo

00:00:07.360 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:11.520 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. And today it will be a show of shows.

00:00:16.000 It will be better than anything you've ever seen.

00:00:18.320 And could run a little bit long because of the high quality of all the content.

00:00:23.360 The news is really serving up some juicy stuff today so

00:00:26.640 Make sure you stay for that, but first, would you like to participate in something we call

00:00:31.980 the Simultaneous Sip?

00:00:33.240 If you do, all you need is a cupper mugger, a glass, a tanker, chalice, a stein, a canteen

00:00:37.600 jugger, a flask, a professor of living kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, I like

00:00:42.500 coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the

00:00:46.780 thing that makes everything better, it's called Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now, go.

00:00:56.640 Ah, well, which of the juicy stories do you want to talk about first?

00:01:05.160 Let's start with this one, apparently, two Chinese laboratories believe they have created 0.98

00:01:11.800 so-called room temperature superconductivity, I know, I know, stop it, stop it, I know what

00:01:20.900 you're going to say, it's all fake, because it's always debunked.

00:01:26.640 And as soon as you hear one of these stories, it's going to be debunked, but this one hasn't

00:01:31.260 been debunked yet, it's brand new.

00:01:33.320 So there is something different from the last time they had a similar claim, and the big

00:01:39.000 difference is it's allegedly been duplicated.

00:01:44.000 So allegedly, two labs have duplicated it, so that didn't happen before.

00:01:49.380 Does that mean it's real?

00:01:50.520 Well, probably not, if I had to place a bet, probably not, but it might be, kind of exciting.

00:01:58.900 I like to be excited for as long as it takes until it gets debunked.

00:02:05.200 Well, I think Spain has decided to follow the example of Germany and get rid of their 1.00

00:02:10.420 nuclear plants.

00:02:11.780 So sell all your stock in Spain and Germany, because they've decided to go out of business.

00:02:19.180 I'd be surprised if there's still really countries in 100 years.

00:02:22.720 They're probably just going to absorb by their neighbors.

00:02:25.740 It seems like you're planning to be out of business if you're not doing nuclear power.

00:02:29.780 But speaking of nuclear power, every time we talk about nuclear is bad, and there are countries 0.88

00:02:37.820 that are discontinuing it, and how are we going to stop climate change, there's one story

00:02:45.740 we tend to forget, which is, I'm not positive, but it looks like Rolls-Royce solved all of

00:02:54.740 the problems of nuclear power.

00:02:57.560 Are you aware of that?

00:02:58.820 So Rolls-Royce has other businesses besides cars, and one of them is they're making these

00:03:05.680 small modular reactors, SMRs.

00:03:11.220 So their model is they'll build you a small nuclear power plant, and all the parts will

00:03:16.740 be made in a factory.

00:03:18.440 So instead of trying to build a one-off power plant that's designed from scratch, which could

00:03:24.280 take 30 years to get approved and up and running.

00:03:28.820 The idea is to have these factory-built, small, standardized components that once you get them

00:03:37.460 approved in a given country, should be fairly easy to just keep reproducing the model.

00:03:42.680 And so they've got, they already have this, this is existing technology.

00:03:47.540 So they've got small reactors that will power a million homes for 60 years.

00:03:54.180 So one small reactor, a million homes for 60 years.

00:03:59.540 Now that is existing stuff.

00:04:02.540 I feel like climate change is solved.

00:04:09.180 Is there something wrong with this technology that nobody's talking about?

00:04:13.300 Because if this works, just do more of this.

00:04:19.940 That's it.

00:04:20.940 That's the entire climate change, energy.

00:04:23.940 It would end inflation.

00:04:26.580 It would basically end inflation because it would reduce the cost of energy so much over

00:04:32.580 time that our impossible to pay off debt might actually be possible because the cost of things

00:04:38.580 would go down, might raise some extra money and be able to pay stuff off.

00:04:42.580 It's possible.

00:04:43.580 So I think the only way out of our debt problems, Zeke Ramaswamy is the only one who has any

00:04:55.340 idea what to do with it.

00:04:57.500 He says, create more energy in this company, country, get our GDP up with energy because

00:05:04.060 that's the big one.

00:05:06.140 Energy is the thing you can turn the valve and really turn up your GDP if you're American.

00:05:11.960 And so do it.

00:05:13.240 And that could help us pay off our debt as well.

00:05:16.960 Here's some shocking statistics about the percentage of kids without fathers.

00:05:21.720 So this is from an End Wokeness post, which is a real good follow.

00:05:28.700 If you're on the X platform, look for an account called End Wokeness and it's got gold every

00:05:35.280 single day.

00:05:36.280 It's just good stuff.

00:05:38.280 Anyway, End Wokeness has tweeted that in 1940, 96% of all children in the U.S. were born to

00:05:44.780 a mother and a father.

00:05:46.780 Today, 40% of children are born to a single mother, 40%.

00:05:51.840 That's 64%, Jesus Christ, really, 64% of black babies are born to a single mother?

00:06:03.840 Sorry, I didn't mean to curse there, but I couldn't help it.

00:06:11.940 That is just so shocking.

00:06:13.840 42% of Hispanic and 24% of white are raised with any father present.

00:06:20.840 And you know what this doesn't include?

00:06:22.840 It doesn't include the other bad situation, which is very common, two fathers.

00:06:34.840 Has anybody encountered that situation?

00:06:36.840 We've got the natural father who's still in the life of the children, but then there's

00:06:41.840 a stepdad.

00:06:42.840 So you have two fathers.

00:06:45.840 Not always twice as good.

00:06:48.840 Not always twice as good.

00:06:50.840 Sometimes, it's its own set of problems.

00:06:54.840 Depends on the individuals, actually.

00:06:56.840 So it can be its own problem, but it could be better as well.

00:07:01.840 I would like to, once again, say the obvious that nobody wants to deal with.

00:07:08.840 Yes, the best situation would be two happy parents raising their children in a household

00:07:15.840 with two parents.

00:07:16.840 We all pretty much agree with that.

00:07:19.840 But at what point are you going to realize it's just not going to happen?

00:07:23.840 And at what point do you say, okay, we need an emergency second kind of a model so kids

00:07:30.840 can be raised without the horror of the current situation?

00:07:35.840 I mean, every day that we say, let me close my eyes and say, I'm going to solve the problem

00:07:42.840 by everybody living in a household where you have a happy marriage and everybody stays

00:07:47.840 married.

00:07:48.840 Okay.

00:07:49.840 Can we just stop doing that?

00:07:51.840 That's basically the conservative opinion as well.

00:07:56.840 If you just find some God, you know, get a little God and turn into a Republican, this

00:08:02.840 would all be solved because then marriage would start working.

00:08:05.840 No, marriage doesn't work because the economics are bad. 0.89

00:08:10.840 The minute it was economical to get married, it would be more of it like they used to be

00:08:16.840 and stay married.

00:08:18.840 So we need a new system to take care of those who will never be in the two-parent situation.

00:08:26.840 Because we don't want fewer kids.

00:08:29.840 You know, the conservative method would be all these unmarried people don't have children. 0.99

00:08:34.840 That would literally be the end of the country.

00:08:37.840 If we weren't having fatherless kids, we wouldn't be having enough kids.

00:08:43.840 Not even close.

00:08:44.840 The whole place would fall apart.

00:08:46.840 This population collapse is one of the big existential risks.

00:08:51.840 Well, on the plus side, some might say, there's a caravan of 15,000 people called the Poverty Caravan that's preparing to cross our border, mostly Mexican citizens. 0.88

00:09:07.840 So that's the bad news.

00:09:10.840 The bad news is that 15,000 poor people are crossing the border into the United States on top of the 300,000 or so that came in the past month.

00:09:22.840 So that's the bad news.

00:09:25.840 The worst news is that all 15,000 poor people from Mexico will be getting directing jobs for their own Star Wars sequels. 1.00

00:09:36.840 So that's the worst news.

00:09:39.840 Yeah.

00:09:40.840 Okay.

00:09:41.840 I'll just keep going and you can decide which of these news stories is real and which are not.

00:09:47.840 It's going to be hard to tell.

00:09:49.840 I know.

00:09:50.840 It's going to be a little hard to sort them out, but you could do it.

00:09:53.840 All right.

00:09:54.840 I tweeted yesterday, why can't the president, any president, whether it's Biden or Trump, why can't they use an executive order to close the border?

00:10:04.840 Now, I get that there are asylum laws, and so the law says that we have to process them if they come in through the asylum port.

00:10:13.840 But are you telling me that the head of our military cannot declare that it's a military homeland security problem and just treat it as a military security problem?

00:10:27.840 Well, what's the point of having, you know, the head of your military be the president if they can't do military stuff when they need to?

00:10:37.840 So I guess some Republicans went to the border and House Speaker Mike Johnson basically said the same thing.

00:10:45.840 He said the same thing I did, although he's got a different spin on it, that Biden created the problem with an executive order.

00:10:54.840 The reason things are so bad is the executive order to get rid of the remain in Mexico thing.

00:11:00.840 Apparently, he undid that, and then that opened the floodgates.

00:11:05.840 So, yes, you could use an executive order to reverse other executive orders, but why would he even do that?

00:11:13.840 Like, why are you even playing around with, you know, these little laws?

00:11:18.840 Just declare it a security emergency and treat it like it's a military emergency, because it is.

00:11:25.840 It's an existential threat, not yet.

00:11:28.840 You know, the current, if we stop today, we can absorb the people who came in.

00:11:34.840 You know, there might be more crime, there might be some terrorists who got in, but we could survive with a number who have already gotten in.

00:11:43.840 We're not going to die because of the ones we're already in.

00:11:46.840 But, if we don't slow down the flow really quickly, we can't do it forever.

00:11:53.840 You know, it's not sustainable in even a little bit.

00:11:57.840 So, you know, I'm pretty sure it'll end by election day, one way or the other.

00:12:02.840 But, yes, the president can do an executive order and end it tomorrow.

00:12:07.840 The fact that Biden isn't doing it suggests corruption.

00:12:11.840 It suggests blackmail and or corruption or both.

00:12:17.840 And now Biden is suing Texas because Texas made their own law to make it illegal to enter Texas.

00:12:26.840 And now the federal government is suing Texas for preventing illegal people from entering the country.

00:12:35.840 Now, this is what the third or fourth time they sued Texas for trying to put up their own barriers.

00:12:41.840 So I think it's the fourth or fifth time Texas tried to stop illegal immigration in their state and the federal government put their resources and time and money into stopping the stopping of the illegal immigration.

00:12:57.840 Now, can you think of any reason why the federal government would do that?

00:13:02.840 There's only one corruption.

00:13:05.840 There is only one.

00:13:07.840 Can we stop pretending there's another reason for this?

00:13:11.840 Why are we pretending this is some kind of political thing?

00:13:15.840 It's clearly not political.

00:13:17.840 It is clearly either blackmail or corruption of some kind, which is corruption.

00:13:23.840 Right.

00:13:24.840 We should just give up on pretending this has to do with the internal politics of the Democrats.

00:13:31.840 Oh, the Democrat leader has to keep happy, you know, the left.

00:13:36.840 That's not happening.

00:13:38.840 That is not what's happening.

00:13:40.840 This is clearly corruption.

00:13:42.840 Do you all agree?

00:13:44.840 To me, it's so obvious that it's just screaming at you.

00:13:47.840 Clearly corruption.

00:13:49.840 There's no other reason for the border situation.

00:13:52.840 If you tell me you have some other explanation for it, good luck.

00:13:58.840 What is this?

00:13:59.840 Something like two thirds of the citizens want to reverse?

00:14:04.840 Two thirds.

00:14:05.840 We probably don't have, there are only a few issues that are even close to that kind of agreement in this country.

00:14:12.840 It's not a political question.

00:14:14.840 Stop calling it political.

00:14:16.840 It's just corruption.

00:14:17.840 That's all it is.

00:14:19.840 It's just corruption.

00:14:22.840 Well, so let's see what else is happening.

00:14:29.840 Pew Research says that one quarter of 40 year olds in the United States have never been married and that's a new high. 1.00

00:14:37.840 And I saw Benjamin Carlson ask on the X platform.

00:14:41.840 He said, this is stunning.

00:14:43.840 Why are Americans giving up on marriage?

00:14:45.840 Is that the right question?

00:14:49.840 Is that the question you immediately ask when you see that there's so many unmarried people?

00:14:54.840 Why are Americans giving up on marriage?

00:14:56.840 That's not the question I was going to ask.

00:14:59.840 The question I would ask is, given the way marriage is designed, why would you do it?

00:15:05.840 You know, now I've been married twice and I've told you why I did it.

00:15:11.840 I did it to make it more efficient to give my money away.

00:15:16.840 Literally.

00:15:18.840 To make it more efficient to give my money away.

00:15:20.840 Because I had more than I needed.

00:15:22.840 And I wanted to be in a family situation.

00:15:25.840 I thought that would be more rewarding.

00:15:27.840 And so I wanted to create a situation where it would be, you know, easy legally and economically to transfer money to other people.

00:15:37.840 So for me, it worked.

00:15:39.840 Now, some people say, but Scott, you failed twice.

00:15:43.840 To which I say, what?

00:15:46.840 Wouldn't I know that if I failed twice?

00:15:49.840 I feel like I succeeded twice.

00:15:51.840 Because there were two situations I wanted to get into.

00:15:54.840 I wanted to transfer my money.

00:15:57.840 Not all of it.

00:15:58.840 I kept most of it.

00:15:59.840 In case you're wondering.

00:16:00.840 I did keep most of it.

00:16:02.840 And so I did that twice.

00:16:04.840 And I wouldn't take back either time.

00:16:07.840 Wouldn't take it back at all.

00:16:09.840 So to me, that was two successes.

00:16:14.840 If you started two companies and then sold them and then went on to another company, you wouldn't say you failed because you're not still in that old company.

00:16:23.840 It would depend on what you intended to do when you started out.

00:16:27.840 And what I intended to do, I succeeded at.

00:16:30.840 How much did I think I would be married forever?

00:16:33.840 Not really.

00:16:35.840 I mean, it was a goal.

00:16:37.840 I held it as a target.

00:16:39.840 I didn't really expect it.

00:16:42.840 In the way the system works, expecting a rich person to stay married to a younger woman, that's really a lot to expect.

00:16:57.840 So I didn't expect it.

00:16:59.840 I wanted it, but I didn't expect it.

00:17:02.840 All right.

00:17:04.840 So we need to figure out some system where all these unmarried people can live some kind of fulfilling life. 1.00

00:17:13.840 How many of you saw the viral video of a fake Ramaswamy disemboweling a Washington Post reporter who asked him to disavow white supremacy?

00:17:25.840 Instead of taking the bait, he just eviscerated her on video and it became a sensation.

00:17:35.840 Now, I posted, I can't remember if I read this to you where I only did it in the man cave separately, but here's what I said after watching that video.

00:17:49.840 We saw a vague display a level of capability that we've actually never seen before.

00:17:56.840 We've never seen this.

00:17:58.840 We've never seen somebody operating at this level.

00:18:01.840 Now, maybe it's not your choice.

00:18:03.840 You may choose another candidate.

00:18:05.840 I understand that.

00:18:07.840 But you've never seen anybody operate with this level of capability.

00:18:10.840 And that just has to be called out.

00:18:13.840 I love the fact that America can still produce a vague.

00:18:18.840 Right?

00:18:19.840 We're not dead yet.

00:18:20.840 America still has a little kick.

00:18:23.840 Right?

00:18:24.840 We're still alive.

00:18:25.840 Still got some play.

00:18:28.840 But here's what I said in a longish post.

00:18:34.840 I said, one presidential candidate is head and shoulders above the others in both energy and capability.

00:18:40.840 Now, I chose not to put the name in it.

00:18:43.840 Because if it's not obvious to you, you're not paying attention.

00:18:46.840 Right?

00:18:47.840 And I said, you all know it.

00:18:49.840 But Trump's third act is calling too, and that's not nothing.

00:18:52.840 The three best choices for president are Republicans this time.

00:18:55.840 Right?

00:18:57.840 Trump, the vague, and DeSantis.

00:19:00.840 I don't count Haley as a top three.

00:19:04.840 Now, in my opinion, the fact that the best three candidates are Republican makes Trump assassination proof.

00:19:14.840 And that's a big deal.

00:19:17.840 Because there are a lot of smart, independent people who are saying, you know what?

00:19:22.840 And this is sort of Tucker Carlson's thesis.

00:19:25.840 They've tried everything else.

00:19:27.840 And they've said very clearly that they're going to try everything they need to do to keep them out of office.

00:19:32.840 So, the hint is very thick that very bad actors might try to do something very illegal with Trump.

00:19:42.840 Now, would they do that if they thought that the people who might come in behind him to replace him would be as bad as, or maybe worse, from their perspective?

00:19:53.840 And the answer is, that's why, you know, George Bush Sr. had Dan Quayle.

00:20:00.840 You know, the joke was it made him assassination proof.

00:20:03.840 Now, that was a joke.

00:20:06.840 But in this case, there's something to it.

00:20:09.840 Let me ask you this.

00:20:12.840 Would the deep state Democrats be more afraid of a second term of Trump, which would scare them?

00:20:21.840 Or, imagine something bad happening to Trump because of bad actors.

00:20:26.840 And then either a DeSantis or a Veig coming into office after that.

00:20:33.840 Because that would be the license to do anything.

00:20:36.840 If something took out Trump with violence, I guarantee you're getting a Republican president.

00:20:45.840 If it happens before the election, I guarantee you get a Republican president.

00:20:50.840 And it's going to be one of the top three.

00:20:53.840 And do you think that they would be less effective if Trump got taken out?

00:20:59.840 No.

00:21:00.840 If Trump gets taken out, it's going to be war.

00:21:03.840 But legal.

00:21:04.840 Legal war.

00:21:05.840 Whichever Republican would come in behind him, should such a horrible thing happen, we hope it doesn't.

00:21:11.840 But should that happen, the incoming Republican would have the sword of all sorts.

00:21:20.840 The public would just say, do what you need to do.

00:21:23.840 Just tell us when you're done.

00:21:25.840 Start chopping.

00:21:26.840 So, I think the public, that would be all of you, I think you did what the public should have done.

00:21:36.840 I think the public just wrapped Trump in a protective bubble wrap.

00:21:42.840 And while we were watching, it sort of snuck up on me.

00:21:46.840 And I didn't quite realize what was happening until yesterday.

00:21:49.840 And I realized, you know what?

00:21:52.840 When you've got a Vivek out there just lighting up the social media world with capability,

00:21:58.840 just pure brain power and capability and patriotism.

00:22:03.840 And you've got the strongest governor in recent memory, DeSantis, who's not killing it in terms of campaigning.

00:22:11.840 He's obviously underperforming there.

00:22:13.840 But nobody thinks he would be a bad president.

00:22:16.840 Nobody thinks that.

00:22:17.840 I mean, Republicans don't.

00:22:19.840 Nobody thinks he'd be a bad president.

00:22:22.840 So, be careful what you wish for.

00:22:25.840 If anything happens that takes Trump out, whether it's in a legal sense or whether it's worse,

00:22:32.840 you've got the angels of death right behind him.

00:22:38.840 So, I submit to you that you, the public, have done your job and you have protected the republic.

00:22:45.840 Good job.

00:22:46.840 2024 is coming in like a lion.

00:22:52.840 And anyways, there's a poll that puts, let's see, who is it?

00:22:56.840 Who pulled this?

00:22:57.840 Real clear politics.

00:22:58.840 They got a poll that says Haley's in second place after Trump.

00:23:02.840 Now, that sounds more than it is, right?

00:23:05.840 If you hear that Haley's in second place, you say to yourself, holy cow, like this could be really something.

00:23:12.840 But it's not exactly what it looks like.

00:23:15.840 What actually happens, it looks like Trump took DeSantis' support.

00:23:21.840 So, it dropped DeSantis.

00:23:23.840 So, he's so low that both DeSantis and Haley are in that 10% range.

00:23:28.840 But Haley has a little bit more. 0.64

00:23:31.840 So, basically, they're both in the round to zero.

00:23:34.840 But it's reported as she's in second place.

00:23:37.840 But it rounds to zero.

00:23:40.840 Both of them.

00:23:42.840 Now, Vivek is even behind them.

00:23:45.840 But the difference is, in my opinion, Vivek is polling lower than both of them.

00:23:53.840 Because both DeSantis and Haley look something like an alternative to Trump.

00:24:01.840 Would you agree?

00:24:03.840 People see them as like an alternative to Trump.

00:24:06.840 Whereas Vivek looks like an improved Trump.

00:24:09.840 He's like Trump 2.0, meaning that he could bring you the good stuff without the provocation because he knows how to avoid it.

00:24:20.840 So, I think that Vivek's numbers are artificially suppressed because Trump is everybody's first choice who would also like what Vivek has to offer.

00:24:31.840 So, in my opinion, if something happened, I hope it doesn't, but if something happened to Trump before the primaries are over, I think Vivek would immediately jump to first place.

00:24:44.840 Now, that's just a feeling.

00:24:47.840 But it's a feeling based on how close he is to Trump and the fact that if Trump is alive when something bad happens, he would endorse him.

00:24:57.840 I'm pretty sure that Trump would endorse Vivek if, for some reason, health or anything else, he had to drop out.

00:25:04.840 So, I think he would go right to number one.

00:25:06.840 So, anybody who's writing Vivek off because of his poll numbers, I think you're missing the big story. 0.92

00:25:12.840 That he's sitting there like a freaking whale, right?

00:25:17.840 If you think his participation is trivial, as of his numbers, you're missing the whale. 0.93

00:25:24.840 There's a whale just sitting there, just waiting, and it wouldn't take much for the whale to be in first place.

00:25:33.840 All right.

00:25:36.840 It looks like Biden is going for what I call the narrow ravine strategy, which is he's taking the worst possible attack and he's going to make that his centerpiece.

00:25:48.840 The worst attack is to call January 6th an insurrection and try to pin that on Trump to suppress his votes.

00:25:57.840 Here's why that's the worst.

00:26:00.840 Because unlike the other fake news that Biden has pushed, he can't simply claim it's true.

00:26:09.840 Now, you know, remember the fine people hoax.

00:26:13.840 Biden could just say it's true.

00:26:16.840 He could just say, that's true.

00:26:18.840 And then other people would say, that's not true.

00:26:20.840 And it would sound like it's your word against mine.

00:26:23.840 And then you people just back their side.

00:26:27.840 So he can make ridiculous claims about Trump said you should drink bleach, which he didn't.

00:26:32.840 You know, that kind of stuff. 0.93

00:26:34.840 But what's different about January 6th is how mockable it is.

00:26:40.840 Because it would have been hard to mock somebody who said that Trump called neo-Nazis fine people, because then you have to kind of untangle all the ugliness of the whole event.

00:26:52.840 And it just gets complicated, like, and then it turns into, well, who was there?

00:26:56.840 You know, could there be any good people there?

00:26:58.840 It like just gets ugly.

00:26:59.840 And then the, you know, the one about the bleach, again, if you tried to understand what really happened, there was a real technology at the time.

00:27:08.840 And it gets ugly and complicated.

00:27:11.840 But here's what happens if you imagine this picture.

00:27:15.840 Imagine Biden and Trump debating.

00:27:19.840 Biden, of course, brings up January 6th and calls it an insurrection.

00:27:23.840 Now, just imagine this.

00:27:25.840 Now, it's Trump's turn to talk.

00:27:27.840 And he turns to Biden and he says, you know, I would love you to explain to the American public how you connect the dots between capturing a lectern

00:27:38.840 and sauntering around taking selfies and gaining control of the nuclear triad.

00:27:45.840 Can you explain to us how the unarmed Republicans were planning to take over the U.S. military and control of the country?

00:27:54.840 And can you explain how I thought that would work?

00:27:58.840 Because you seem to be a mind reader.

00:28:00.840 Can you explain what you think I was thinking that would allow me to think that some people protesting in front of one building unarmed could somehow turn that into controlling the government of the United States?

00:28:14.840 Mr. Biden, can you explain that to the American people?

00:28:17.840 And then laugh. 1.00

00:28:19.840 Then fucking laugh. 1.00

00:28:22.840 And just mock him. 1.00

00:28:25.840 So that's what the narrow ravine is.

00:28:29.840 The January 6th thing is the most mockable attack yet.

00:28:35.840 Because it's just so obviously untrue.

00:28:38.840 With the other ones, you have to make an appeal to facts.

00:28:42.840 With January 6th, you don't need to introduce any facts.

00:28:46.840 Because everybody watching knows that you can't really conquer a country by walking around.

00:28:52.840 That doesn't require any persuasion.

00:28:55.840 You just have to say it in public.

00:28:57.840 In front of Biden. 1.00

00:28:59.840 And watch him lose his shit in front of the country. 1.00

00:29:02.840 I mean, literally, Biden would shit his fucking pants on national TV if Trump ever just started mocking him for how stupid that is. 1.00

00:29:12.840 It would be the greatest show on earth. 1.00

00:29:15.840 And it's probably coming.

00:29:17.840 Let me ask you this.

00:29:20.840 You don't think Trump has figured out by now that line of attack?

00:29:25.840 You don't think he knows that if Biden commits to the narrow ravine that the mockery cannons are going to come out?

00:29:32.840 Oh, yeah.

00:29:34.840 Mockery cannons?

00:29:36.840 Coming out.

00:29:38.840 All right.

00:29:39.840 Joel Pollack points out that a bunch of anti-Israel radicals staged an insurrection at the California State Assembly.

00:29:51.840 And they took it over and they shut down the first day of the legislature session.

00:29:55.840 And they forced the lawmakers to flee.

00:29:58.840 So, as you would expect, all of these people who interfered with a government process, they've all been rounded up.

00:30:07.840 And there's a huge committee being formed and they're all being arrested.

00:30:12.840 And they probably have length jail terms.

00:30:17.840 Oh, maybe not.

00:30:18.840 No, actually, I read it wrong.

00:30:20.840 It turns out that there were no arrests.

00:30:26.840 So, that seems fair, right?

00:30:29.840 Now, how in the world can Biden's narrow ravine thing work in the face of Democrats continually shutting down state lawmakers?

00:30:45.840 It's not even the first time it's happened.

00:30:48.840 It's becoming laughable.

00:30:52.840 And once it becomes fully, like, just laughable, and it's right on the edge right now, but I think Trump can push it over, then that's all you need.

00:31:04.840 It just needs to be more laughable. 0.63

00:31:06.840 Apparently, there's some kind of foreign honeypot scheme with prostitutes in D.C. that's just been surfaced. 1.00

00:31:18.840 The D.C. elites being trapped in honeypots, people think.

00:31:23.840 Not quite sure.

00:31:24.840 They know it's prostitution. 1.00

00:31:26.840 But they don't know for sure if there's any foreign stuff.

00:31:31.840 Caesar is asking me very loudly,

00:31:38.840 Scott, question, do you know who Michael LeVon Robinson is?

00:31:44.840 Answer?

00:31:45.840 Nope.

00:31:46.840 Never heard of him.

00:31:50.840 But thanks for asking.

00:31:52.840 Anyway, do you ever get the feeling that our entire country is really a black maleocracy? 0.99

00:32:01.840 Meaning that there's absolutely nothing happening in our government that isn't the result of corruption or black male? 1.00

00:32:08.840 Because it feels like everything is.

00:32:12.840 Like actually everything?

00:32:16.840 Can you tell me why TikTok hasn't been banned?

00:32:20.840 Corruption. 0.98

00:32:21.840 Black male. 0.99

00:32:22.840 There's no other reason.

00:32:24.840 Can you tell me why the border hasn't been secured?

00:32:27.840 Corruption. 0.99

00:32:29.840 Black male. 0.99

00:32:30.840 Black male. 0.65

00:32:31.840 There isn't any other reason.

00:32:33.840 There is no other reason.

00:32:35.840 You know why we haven't stopped fentanyl?

00:32:37.840 A little bit of incompetence. 0.99

00:32:42.840 But probably some black male. 0.99

00:32:44.840 Probably some corruption. 0.98

00:32:46.840 In fact, I don't know anything that isn't a problem of black male or corruption. 1.00

00:32:53.840 It looks like everything is at this point.

00:32:56.840 Now, here's something I've said before, but I'm going to double down on.

00:33:01.840 Any modern country that also has a really good intelligence service will eventually be run by the intelligence service.

00:33:10.840 It can't not happen.

00:33:13.840 By design, it's kind of guaranteed.

00:33:18.840 Here's why it's guaranteed.

00:33:20.840 Imagine I told you, all right, here's something you're going to invent.

00:33:23.840 You're going to invent a government system where there's a government and they're elected.

00:33:28.840 But separately, you're going to have a really high quality intelligence service working for you.

00:33:34.840 Now, their job will be to use influence and all kinds of dirty tricks and money and bribery and blackmail to affect the elections in other countries.

00:33:45.840 Now, they're also allowed to work here and they can influence our people.

00:33:52.840 And then you wait.

00:33:54.840 What would that system guarantee?

00:33:57.840 Well, the design of that system guarantees that the people who are trained to take over countries without getting caught and change their government without getting caught,

00:34:09.840 will eventually, maybe not on day one, but eventually as different people come in, somebody's going to get the idea.

00:34:18.840 Hey, why don't we just take over this country? 0.86

00:34:22.840 Because we know how.

00:34:25.840 In theory, your intelligence chiefs should come to own all of the politicians.

00:34:34.840 They should.

00:34:39.840 In a normal course of things, that's how that system design should work.

00:34:46.840 So on day one, maybe no problem at all.

00:34:49.840 But eventually you get a J. Edgar Hoover situation where the intelligence definitely knows too much about the bad behavior of the politicians.

00:34:58.840 At that point, did we get the 34-minute glitch?

00:35:01.840 Yeah, I just saw it myself.

00:35:03.840 34-minute glitch.

00:35:05.840 We still don't know what that is.

00:35:06.840 But every day the podcast glitches on two different platforms running on different devices.

00:35:12.840 These are different platforms on different devices.

00:35:14.840 The only thing common is my Wi-Fi, but it doesn't go down.

00:35:19.840 So I don't know what's going on.

00:35:22.840 Anyway, let's talk about some more stuff.

00:35:27.840 There's some commander in an Iran-affiliated Iraqi militia who got killed by a drone strike in Baghdad.

00:35:34.840 It looks to me like Israel and maybe the United States have decided that they now have a free pass to take out all Iranian proxies everywhere. 0.98

00:35:44.840 Does it feel like that to you?

00:35:47.840 Because I think they do actually have a free pass to take out all Iranian proxies anywhere in the world. 1.00

00:35:53.840 And so they kill one of Hamas people in Beirut.

00:35:59.840 Did you see what Hamas said?

00:36:01.840 No, I mean Hezbollah.

00:36:03.840 So Hezbollah in Lebanon, somebody gets killed in basically their territory in Beirut.

00:36:09.840 And you know what they said?

00:36:12.840 Oh, if you keep doing stuff like this, there's no telling what we'll do. 0.99

00:36:18.840 They basically didn't do a fucking thing. 0.99

00:36:22.840 They just took it. 0.99

00:36:24.840 Because it wasn't really them.

00:36:26.840 Hezbollah is not Hamas.

00:36:29.840 So killing a Hamas person in Hezbollah territory, all that gets you is some words.

00:36:34.840 Ah, don't do that. 0.96

00:36:36.840 We could do something maybe if you kept it up.

00:36:41.840 So Hezbollah basically seems totally defanged.

00:36:44.840 Because you know what Hezbollah knows? 0.71

00:36:47.840 Let me tell you what Hezbollah knows because I know it too. 0.88

00:36:51.840 And you probably know it too. 0.99

00:36:53.840 They're about one rocket away from being fucking destroyed. 0.98

00:36:58.840 They've never been this close to being absolutely obliterated. 0.99

00:37:03.840 Because you know what Israel's not doing this month? 0.99

00:37:10.840 They're not taking any shit from anybody. 0.99

00:37:14.840 The fuck around and find out period is now completely into find out. 1.00

00:37:20.840 There's no fuck around anymore. 1.00

00:37:22.840 Now you're just finding out. 1.00

00:37:25.840 Hezbollah should know that although they could do a lot of damage to Israel, 0.99

00:37:30.840 tens of thousands of missiles apparently.

00:37:33.840 They could do a lot of damage.

00:37:35.840 But if they do, Israel's not going to just poke them back in an equal way. 0.67

00:37:42.840 Right?

00:37:43.840 If Hezbollah sends, you know, X number of rockets, Israel's just going to say, 1.00

00:37:48.840 all right, now we have to kill every one of you. 1.00

00:37:50.840 We're going to hunt you down and kill every one of you however long it takes. 1.00

00:37:54.840 Because that's what they're doing with Hamas. 1.00

00:37:57.840 And most reasonable observers are saying, yeah, they kind of have to do that.

00:38:03.840 So I think they have Hezbollah completely frightened, you know, 1.00

00:38:09.840 with the United States help, I'm sure.

00:38:11.840 So that they're just going to sit back. 0.99

00:38:13.840 But I also think that they can kill as many Iranian proxies as they want. 0.94

00:38:21.840 And Iran is going to stand down. 0.97

00:38:25.840 Because it's just a free pass.

00:38:27.840 I think you're going to see Iranian proxies just drop like flies. 1.00

00:38:32.840 And it's not going to stop.

00:38:33.840 It's just going to be, you know, one or two a week.

00:38:38.840 And you'll just get tired of the news.

00:38:40.840 The news will start sounding the same.

00:38:42.840 A Hamas leader was killed by a drone strike, number 23 this month.

00:38:48.840 It's not going to stop.

00:38:50.840 All right.

00:38:53.840 There were two big terrorist kind of explosions that happened in Iran

00:39:01.840 at the funeral for the military guy who got taken out.

00:39:06.840 And Israel declined to comment on whether they were involved.

00:39:16.840 Do I have that news right?

00:39:18.840 I believe they declined to say they didn't do it.

00:39:22.840 Is that right?

00:39:24.840 They declined to say it wasn't them.

00:39:27.840 Isn't that interesting?

00:39:29.840 Why would they do that?

00:39:31.840 Now, I don't think that they would do it directly.

00:39:34.840 I don't think there's any chance that they, you know,

00:39:37.840 set the bomb with an Israeli operative or something like that.

00:39:42.840 I do think it would be a real interesting strategy 0.82

00:39:47.840 if Iran is the terror capital of the world, 0.93

00:39:50.840 if Israel just said, you know what?

00:39:54.840 The seal is off.

00:39:56.840 Everything's on the table now.

00:39:58.840 I don't know that they're saying that.

00:40:00.840 But they could.

00:40:01.840 I mean, you could understand they would say it.

00:40:04.840 To me, it looks like they have, Israel is funding terrorists within Iran, 1.00

00:40:09.840 and they're just going to say, we're going to fucking kill all of you. 1.00

00:40:13.840 We're going to sort of blow up everything in your country through proxies. 1.00

00:40:18.840 As long as you keep funding proxies that are killing us, 0.99

00:40:22.840 we're going to fund terrorists in your own country. 1.00

00:40:25.840 We're going to fund Arab terrorists. 1.00

00:40:29.840 Well, not Arab, but let's say terrorists in Iran until you stop. 0.99

00:40:36.840 Now, let me ask you this.

00:40:38.840 If you were Israel, and you had gotten to this point, you know,

00:40:42.840 where Iran has funded Hamas and all these bad characters, 0.93

00:40:46.840 would you have any reservations about funding terrorists in Iran,

00:40:53.840 if you were Israel?

00:40:55.840 I have reservations, but would you, if you were Israel?

00:41:00.840 I think I'd do it.

00:41:02.840 Now, from my perspective, you know, I'm not in Israel,

00:41:06.840 and I did not suffer through October 7th.

00:41:08.840 If I had, I'm sure I'd be in favor of terrorism in Iran. 1.00

00:41:13.840 I hate to say it, but, you know, that kind of violence changes you.

00:41:20.840 You're not the same person after that.

00:41:23.840 Like, I don't think America was the same after 9-11.

00:41:26.840 I don't think we're the same after Pearl Harbor,

00:41:29.840 and I don't think Israel will ever be the same after October 7th. 0.59

00:41:34.840 So would Israel, I think Israel wants Iran to know 0.78

00:41:42.840 that they are not completely innocent of this,

00:41:46.840 but maybe didn't do it directly.

00:41:48.840 It feels like Israel wants them to know this is their future.

00:41:52.840 Don't you think?

00:41:55.840 And the people that they killed were the supporters of the people,

00:42:00.840 the person they already killed.

00:42:02.840 Do you think Israel is too concerned about killing citizens 0.52

00:42:07.840 who were lionizing and supporting the terrorist that was killing Israelis?

00:42:12.840 Probably not.

00:42:14.840 Probably not so much.

00:42:16.840 Now, I don't want to read any minds, but I put myself in their position,

00:42:21.840 and if I had lived through October 7th the way they did,

00:42:27.840 all of my filters would be gone.

00:42:29.840 I'd just say, do what you need to do.

00:42:31.840 Whatever it takes, do what you need to do.

00:42:34.840 It looks like that's what's happening.

00:42:37.840 So, as you know, a bunch of names have been released

00:42:41.840 because there was a lawsuit that had been secreted until now,

00:42:45.840 that Virginia Jeffrey person.

00:42:48.840 So I guess those legal documents are out,

00:42:51.840 and they include a bunch of references to famous people.

00:42:57.840 Now, my first thought was I wasn't going to mention any of the famous people

00:43:02.840 because they're not charged with anything.

00:43:07.840 They don't seem to have direct evidence of crimes.

00:43:11.840 The one that had a direct evidence of a crime has already been cleared.

00:43:18.840 So the only one where there were some details that he did some bad stuff

00:43:22.840 were allegations against Alan Dershowitz that, as Chris Cuomo pointed out,

00:43:29.840 were dropped because of lack of corroboration.

00:43:32.840 In other words, there was nobody else who seemed to think Alan Dershowitz did that,

00:43:36.840 and there must have been enough people involved with the island and with Epstein

00:43:40.840 that if it were true that he had that much naughty behavior,

00:43:46.840 it does seem likely that some other person would corroborate it.

00:43:50.840 So there's no corroboration, and I guess she dropped her.

00:43:55.840 She actually withdrew her allegations, if I understand correctly.

00:43:58.840 Can somebody confirm that?

00:44:01.840 Didn't the woman who was mentioning him in these documents that we now see,

00:44:06.840 did she not?

00:44:08.840 Yeah, right.

00:44:10.840 She actually took back her accusations.

00:44:13.840 So Chris Cuomo knew that and wanted to point it out to some bad actors

00:44:18.840 who didn't want to point it out.

00:44:20.840 You can't talk about this case without mentioning that Epstein was number one,

00:44:27.840 that Dershowitz was, first of all, Epstein's lawyer,

00:44:31.840 which is all the reason you need to spend time with him, including on his jet.

00:44:36.840 There's probably a lot of business gets done traveling back and forth if you're in that kind of world.

00:44:41.840 Now, am I telling you that I know that Dershowitz is either guilty or not guilty?

00:44:49.840 I don't know.

00:44:50.840 I just know we live in a world where it's hard to believe anything.

00:44:54.840 So I'm going to give you, I don't know, but I'm also going to give you, forcefully,

00:45:03.840 innocent until proven guilty.

00:45:06.840 Innocent until proven guilty.

00:45:08.840 We just can't abandon that.

00:45:10.840 Like, just because it's on social media and just because it's in the news,

00:45:14.840 we can't just act like these people are guilty.

00:45:17.840 We just can't.

00:45:19.840 Just don't do it.

00:45:21.840 So I wasn't going to mention them until I realized there was a kind of a pattern.

00:45:26.840 We'll see if you can catch it.

00:45:28.840 I'm going to read the names of people who are mentioned.

00:45:31.840 And I emphasize again, none of the names I read have any credible accusations of criminal activity.

00:45:39.840 In my opinion, I'm not aware of any credible allegations against any of them.

00:45:46.840 So the fact that they're mentioned, often they were mentioned in the, you didn't do anything.

00:45:52.840 So for example, Trump is mentioned, but the context is that there's no indication he had any bad behavior.

00:46:00.840 Wasn't on the island.

00:46:02.840 So they're mentioned, but sometimes they're mentioned in the context of clearing them.

00:46:09.840 But I want to ask you if you see any commonality with these names.

00:46:14.840 So these are just names mentioned.

00:46:17.840 Again, not people who were accused of anything.

00:46:20.840 They're just mentioned.

00:46:21.840 Trump.

00:46:22.840 Bill Clinton.

00:46:23.840 There's some Stephen Hawkins, but it can't be the Stephen Hawkins.

00:46:27.840 So I don't know about that one.

00:46:29.840 There's this Pritzker guy who some say is connected with organized crime and is a sketchy background.

00:46:38.840 There's Michael Jackson, David Copperfield, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates separately.

00:46:45.840 We know he had some connections.

00:46:47.840 I don't think he was mentioned in this one.

00:46:49.840 Alan Dershowitz, we talked about.

00:46:51.840 Glenn Dubin.

00:46:52.840 He's a billionaire hedge fund manager.

00:46:54.840 And Kevin Spacey.

00:46:55.840 Now, when you hear all those names, what jumps out?

00:46:59.840 What do they all have in common?

00:47:02.840 No.

00:47:07.840 No.

00:47:08.840 No.

00:47:09.840 No.

00:47:10.840 No.

00:47:11.840 No.

00:47:12.840 No.

00:47:13.840 No.

00:47:14.840 No.

00:47:15.840 No.

00:47:16.840 No.

00:47:17.840 No.

00:47:18.840 I see all your guesses.

00:47:19.840 No.

00:47:20.840 No.

00:47:21.840 No.

00:47:22.840 No.

00:47:23.840 You don't see it?

00:47:24.840 It doesn't jump right now at you?

00:47:25.840 OK.

00:47:26.840 I think somebody got it.

00:47:27.840 I think somebody got it.

00:47:29.840 If you were...

00:47:30.840 Let me put it in this terms.

00:47:31.840 You'll see it right away.

00:47:33.840 If I said to you, hey, we're going to start a blackmail operation. 0.99

00:47:39.840 And somebody says, of who?

00:47:42.840 You say, anybody we can get.

00:47:44.840 Anybody we can get.

00:47:45.840 We're going to...

00:47:46.840 If they're a famous person, we're going to try to blackmail them.

00:47:50.840 We'll get as many as we can.

00:47:51.840 We'll get celebrities.

00:47:52.840 We'll get politicians.

00:47:54.840 Just anybody we can get.

00:47:56.840 All right.

00:47:57.840 Where are you going to start?

00:47:59.840 Where would you start your blackmail operation?

00:48:02.840 Would you say, I think we can get Mike Pence?

00:48:07.840 No.

00:48:08.840 No.

00:48:09.840 You wouldn't start with Mike Pence.

00:48:11.840 Because Mike Pence won't even have lunch with somebody who's not his wife.

00:48:15.840 You would say to yourself, OK, nobody knows what anybody's doing in their private life.

00:48:20.840 But that would be a low probability play.

00:48:25.840 Kind of a waste of time, right?

00:48:27.840 Wouldn't you think?

00:48:29.840 Now I'm going to give you another name.

00:48:31.840 And you tell me if you think maybe there'd be a good chance of blackmail.

00:48:36.840 Kevin Spacey.

00:48:38.840 Kevin Spacey.

00:48:40.840 Michael Jackson.

00:48:43.840 Do you think there's any chance you could blackmail any of those guys?

00:48:48.840 Bill Clinton.

00:48:50.840 Bill Gates.

00:48:52.840 Do you think they're blackmailable? 1.00

00:48:54.840 David Copperfield.

00:48:55.840 Hasn't David Copperfield been accused of some things?

00:49:07.840 Prince Andrew.

00:49:08.840 Do you think there's any male member of the royal family that's not blackmailable? 1.00

00:49:15.840 You should watch The Crown, that series, The Crown.

00:49:20.840 And then you tell me if there's any male member of the royal family you think is not blackmailable. 0.98

00:49:26.840 All right.

00:49:28.840 I don't know this billionaire hedge fund manager, but let me ask you generally speaking.

00:49:33.840 How many billionaire hedge fund managers do you think are blackmailable? 0.51

00:49:38.840 Oh, probably a few.

00:49:40.840 Not all of them.

00:49:42.840 Not all of them.

00:49:43.840 Oh, but probably a few.

00:49:46.840 So is it my imagination or is it obvious to you that the names mentioned have that weird quality that if you were going to guess who could be blackmailed, they would be at the top of your list?

00:50:02.840 Does that seem like a coincidence?

00:50:04.840 Is that just a coincidence that they all look like they could be blackmailed?

00:50:11.840 Now, again, I want to be as careful as I can about this because these are innocent people.

00:50:17.840 By our system, every person mentioned, completely innocent until proven guilty.

00:50:23.840 And I don't think that's going to happen.

00:50:25.840 So I'm not saying that any of these people did things which make them blackmailable.

00:50:31.840 I'm saying that if I were to guess who I might be able to blackmail, they would be my first choices.

00:50:37.840 Every one of them.

00:50:39.840 So does that...

00:50:41.840 How many of you saw that?

00:50:43.840 How many of you saw that immediately they all had that quality of, at least I think I could blackmail them?

00:50:49.840 How many of you saw that?

00:50:52.840 Because I think that's the big reveal.

00:50:55.840 To me, that almost guarantees that it was a blackmail operation, which we all kind of assumed.

00:51:02.840 All right.

00:51:03.840 Here's some more.

00:51:04.840 I guess it was about 10 months ago Alan Dershowitz did an interview in which he was asked directly by Kim Iverson, who was interviewing him, if Epstein was working for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence.

00:51:23.840 So here's what Dershowitz answered when asked if Epstein works for Mossad.

00:51:30.840 Now, let me ask you.

00:51:33.840 If you knew the answer to that question, and I'm sure Dershowitz does.

00:51:38.840 Do you think that's true?

00:51:41.840 Do you think Dershowitz knows the real answer to that question?

00:51:44.840 Like for sure?

00:51:46.840 Yeah.

00:51:47.840 Now, the first thing that Dershowitz pointed out is that he himself has been working for Israel since before Kim Iverson was born.

00:51:58.840 He's so good at this.

00:52:01.840 Dershowitz is so good.

00:52:03.840 That was exactly the right answer.

00:52:05.840 To say, I worked for Israel since before you were born.

00:52:09.840 So, right.

00:52:11.840 So now the first thing you know about Dershowitz is he will quite proudly tell you that he has been working for publicly.

00:52:18.840 There is no secret.

00:52:19.840 Publicly, he has supported Israel.

00:52:21.840 He's one of the greatest supporters.

00:52:23.840 You know, worked with them in a variety of ways.

00:52:25.840 Now, so you know he's pro-Israel and more pro-Israel than even pro-Israel people are.

00:52:32.840 He's about as pro-Israel as you can get.

00:52:34.840 So when he was asked if Epstein was working for Mossad, Dershowitz said that Mossad would never hire him.

00:52:46.840 No, he definitely did not work for Mossad.

00:52:48.840 No, he definitely did not work for Mossad.

00:52:49.840 They would never hire him.

00:52:51.840 Do you see it?

00:52:54.840 Do you see how much of a lawyer answer that is?

00:52:59.840 Why would you give a lawyer answer to that if the real answer was no?

00:53:04.840 If you knew the answer, and you knew the answer was no, why would you answer it in a hypothetical that they would never hire him?

00:53:15.840 And let me ask you this.

00:53:17.840 Is anybody suggesting they hired him and gave him a paycheck?

00:53:22.840 Is anybody suggesting that when Epstein did his W-2, it was 1099, he had to write down,

00:53:29.840 and Mossad paid me $10 billion?

00:53:33.840 No, that's not the way anything works.

00:53:36.840 Do you know who knows that that's not the way anything works?

00:53:40.840 Who knows that besides me and now you?

00:53:42.840 Alan Dershowitz.

00:53:44.840 He knows nothing works that way.

00:53:46.840 So why did he answer the question that way?

00:53:48.840 Why would he answer the question that they didn't hire him when they know damn well it's not a hiring situation?

00:53:55.840 It would be, let's say, associates working for a common, not common, but their own purposes.

00:54:06.840 Yeah.

00:54:07.840 Trust me, there's no piece of paper.

00:54:10.840 There's no piece of paper.

00:54:12.840 That's not how anything works.

00:54:16.840 If he were working for Mossad, it was a favor-for-favor situation or possibly cash in some way that we can't trace.

00:54:27.840 But probably, probably he got to extract money from his victims, had some kind of cover from somebody.

00:54:37.840 And by the way, even if Mossad was working with him, and I don't know for sure, that doesn't mean that there were no other intelligence agencies also working with him.

00:54:49.840 It doesn't mean that America wasn't.

00:54:52.840 We don't know.

00:54:55.840 But given that Dershowitz is a master of communication, I would say that if he meant to say that Epstein had never had any connection with Mossad, he would have said something like,

00:55:07.840 I can tell you for sure, because I've known him forever, he's my client, I've worked with Israel, and there's no indication that he ever had any association with, worked with, did a favor for, had conversations with, met with, or any connection with Mossad.

00:55:24.840 That's how you would answer it, if the answer is no.

00:55:28.840 Do you know how you answer it?

00:55:31.840 If the answer is yes, he definitely was working with Mossad, they would never hire him.

00:55:37.840 That's how you would answer it, if the answer is yes.

00:55:39.840 They would never hire him, because indeed, that's true. 0.99

00:55:42.840 They would never hire him.

00:55:44.840 They would never make him go through HR and get a paycheck.

00:55:48.840 Absolutely true.

00:55:50.840 So I consider it confirmation that he worked for Mossad.

00:55:55.840 I consider the names on the list confirmation, at least in my own personal opinion, that it was a blackmail operation.

00:56:04.840 I would not say that Mossad is necessarily his only influence, or the only reason he did anything, but probably had some connections, probably.

00:56:14.840 All right.

00:56:17.840 So again, I say, I think I live in a blackmailocracy.

00:56:20.840 I don't think this is a republic.

00:56:22.840 I think we actually are a network of blackmailed, corrupt people who somehow work as a system still.

00:56:31.840 But blackmail is the dominant element of our government, is my opinion, at the moment.

00:56:36.840 Kamala Harris defined equity for us.

00:56:39.840 She said, quote, it means everyone ends up in the same place.

00:56:43.840 And that's what she wants.

00:56:44.840 She wants everybody to end up in the same place. 0.99

00:56:46.840 Now, that was good news for me, because honestly, I never thought I could be a fucking incompetent vice president. 0.97

00:56:54.840 But apparently, I'm going to have a shot at it, because equity requires that someday I will be a fucking incompetent vice president, because everybody ends up in the same place. 0.98

00:57:07.840 Did I understand her wrong? 0.97

00:57:08.840 I hope I didn't misinterpret her. 1.00

00:57:10.840 But I think I can be a fucking idiot, too, and also a vice president. 1.00

00:57:15.840 I'm going to have a lot of equity. 1.00

00:57:16.840 I'm going to have a lot of equity.

00:57:17.840 Well, Mark Cuban weighed in on DEI, and he disagrees with Musk, who thinks DEI is a form of discrimination and racism.

00:57:27.840 And he's in favor of DEI.

00:57:30.840 Now, let me ask you this.

00:57:32.840 If I told you there was a certain billionaire who was very smart and recently sold his interest in a major basketball team,

00:57:43.840 that was his greatest love, but he sold it, made a nice profit, but he sold it, and then publicly came out in favor of DEI,

00:57:56.840 what would you say about that billionaire?

00:58:01.840 What is he preparing to do?

00:58:04.840 Well, to me, it looks like he's the Democrat candidate under glass.

00:58:10.840 He's the emergency candidate.

00:58:13.840 I know we all think that Newsom is the emergency candidate, but here's what I suspect.

00:58:20.840 You know how I said we're a blackmailocracy?

00:58:23.840 Can you imagine how much we don't know about Governor Newsom that maybe somebody does know?

00:58:35.840 I'm concerned that the Democrats don't think Newsom can get the ball over the goal line, because there might be too much, what do you call it, research about the enemy?

00:58:50.840 What's that called? Opposition research.

00:58:52.840 There might be some opposition research that's sort of just sitting there waiting, because you wouldn't release the opposition research, the oppo.

00:59:01.840 You wouldn't release that too early, because you'd want to make sure he was in the race before you shoot your rod.

00:59:09.840 So it could be that Democrats secretly know Newsom can't get the ball in the end zone.

00:59:16.840 So they needed an emergency, break the glass, last minute candidate who is name recognition, widely recognized as not a super partisan, you know, more of an entrepreneurial person.

00:59:30.840 And to me, it's very suspicious that he would sell his beloved basketball team, which is exactly what you'd want to do if you're going to run for office, because he would be savaged in his business life for anything he does in politics.

00:59:47.840 And you would need to come out in favor of DEI if you're going to run as a Democrat.

00:59:52.840 And I want to give you this further evidence. 0.97

00:59:55.840 Since I think all of you are on the same page that supporting DEI is so stupid, that how in the world could somebody like Mark Cuban, who is unambiguously very smart, 0.99

01:00:10.840 support DEI when DEI is clearly stupid and unproductive and evil. 0.99

01:00:19.840 So I'm going to read you his support for it. 0.99

01:00:22.840 And I want you to look for this.

01:00:24.840 Does that sound like a quality argument that you would expect from somebody like Mark Cuban?

01:00:29.840 Very smart, very accomplished, super knowledgeable.

01:00:33.840 Does that sound like Mark Cuban? 0.99

01:00:37.840 Or does it sound like something some bullshit candidate would say when he's running for office? 0.97

01:00:43.840 Because he's not really invested in, you know, DEI in his business life, you know, more than making his companies happy, I suppose. 0.96

01:00:52.840 I mean, it's not like something he needs to fight for, especially poorly.

01:00:57.840 All right.

01:00:58.840 So I'm going to read his defense of DEI and see if it feels persuasive and on point.

01:01:05.840 He says two things.

01:01:08.840 Number one, diversity.

01:01:10.840 Good businesses look where others don't to find the employees that will put your business in the best possible position to succeed.

01:01:18.840 You may not agree, but I take it as a given that there are people of various races, ethnicities, orientations, etc.

01:01:25.840 That are regularly excluded from hiring consideration.

01:01:29.840 By extending our hiring search to include them, we can find people that are more qualified.

01:01:34.840 The loss of DEI phobic companies is my game.

01:01:38.840 Does that sound pretty persuasive?

01:01:42.840 What's he leaving out?

01:01:45.840 What's he leaving out?

01:01:48.840 He seems to think that there's a secret, a secret cache of unemployed, high quality people that fit these various DEI categories.

01:02:01.840 He thinks they're just waiting to be found.

01:02:04.840 Do you think he believes that?

01:02:06.840 Do you think that Mark Cuban believes that if a company just tries harder and looks a little deeper, they can get equally qualified people who have been hiding or have been overlooked because your company is racist and doesn't look in the right places?

01:02:25.840 Do you think he really believes that? 0.99

01:02:28.840 Now, I can't read his mind, but I'm going to say that what he said here is so obviously stupid that it doesn't match who he is. 1.00

01:02:37.840 There's no way his brain came up with this and then thought it was good. 1.00

01:02:44.840 I don't believe that.

01:02:46.840 To me, it's a pretty strong signal that he likes diversity, which I do as well.

01:02:53.840 Diversity is good.

01:02:55.840 But Illinois is trying too hard.

01:02:57.840 It very much looked like positioning for a political candidate under glass situation.

01:03:05.840 By the way, if he hears this, he's going to be really mad at me, either because I'm wrong or because I'm right.

01:03:12.840 But either way, he's not going to like it.

01:03:14.840 So, Mark, if you're listening, I apologize in advance, but this is my honest opinion.

01:03:21.840 Then he says another point.

01:03:23.840 He says, we live in a country with very diverse demographics in this area where trusted businesses can be hard to come by.

01:03:29.840 People tend to connect more easily to people who are like them.

01:03:34.840 Having a workforce as diverse and representative of our stakeholders is good for business.

01:03:39.840 Now, that's a tough argument to make.

01:03:44.840 Because to make the argument, you have to make the argument that people are different because of their ethnic and other differences.

01:03:53.840 That they're genuinely different and they act differently.

01:03:57.840 And do we believe that the only way that they're genuinely differently and they act differently is that some of them have more insight?

01:04:04.840 That's the main way they act differently?

01:04:07.840 That they have more insight?

01:04:09.840 I don't know.

01:04:10.840 It's kind of a sketchy argument.

01:04:12.840 But I would say that 100% of companies agree with his main point here, which is that if everything was equal, every company would like diversity.

01:04:24.840 Do you agree?

01:04:26.840 If there was no issue with the performance of the employees, wouldn't every employee like diversity?

01:04:37.840 He acts as though there's somebody who doesn't want it.

01:04:40.840 Because his argument is solid.

01:04:42.840 In a world that is diverse, it is absolutely an advantage if the people who use your company can look at you and say, oh, that looks like the public.

01:04:52.840 I'm comfortable with you people.

01:04:54.840 So everybody understands that if you could achieve diversity without giving something up, everybody would want it.

01:05:01.840 But how do you all fish in the same little waterhole and not overfish it?

01:05:10.840 So it's basically an overfishing problem, which he ignores, and he obviously knows it's a real problem.

01:05:17.840 So that's why I don't believe his opinion.

01:05:19.840 Anyway, we'll see if that's just me being crazy.

01:05:26.840 Here's more on DEI.

01:05:27.840 Axios says that cutbacks in DEI could lead to a decline in diversity in organizations.

01:05:33.840 Well, I think it would.

01:05:34.840 And then one recent study found that companies with DEI teams make more diverse hires and have higher levels of employee morale.

01:05:42.840 Do you think that's true?

01:05:44.840 Do you think that groups with DEI have higher morale?

01:05:49.840 And is that for all the employees?

01:05:52.840 Were the white men in companies where they brought in DEI, were the white men happier?

01:05:59.840 Do you believe this?

01:06:02.840 Do you believe this? 1.00

01:06:03.840 This sounds ridiculous. 0.94

01:06:05.840 I don't believe that DEI makes anybody happier.

01:06:08.840 In fact, I will go further, and I'll bet DEI makes the minority employees less happy. 1.00

01:06:14.840 Do you know why?

01:06:16.840 If you're a high-capability employee and you see that the DEI people are bringing in lower-quality people because it's a small pool everybody's fishing from, not because they're lower-quality in general, just a smaller pool, which is math.

01:06:31.840 Wouldn't you think, oh, shoot, now people are going to think I'm a diversity hire because of all the real diversity hires.

01:06:39.840 They're going to think I'm one, too, and I'm not.

01:06:41.840 I actually have qualifications.

01:06:43.840 So how does that improve your morale?

01:06:48.840 I can't imagine that improving your morale at all.

01:06:53.840 Anyway, MSNBC tried to do a hit piece on Christopher Ruffo, who, as you know, is one of the main, if not the main person fighting against DEI and CRT and ESG.

01:07:07.840 And so as Christopher reposted, so MSNBC ran a four-minute segment, which is a lot on television, four minutes, recapping all of the evil things that Christopher Ruffo did, except that it reads like best of, best hits, success thing.

01:07:29.840 Like, everything they mention, like, they try to act with their words like it's really bad.

01:07:37.840 But then when they describe what it is, I think, well, that was really good.

01:07:42.840 That's like a big success.

01:07:43.840 Then they'll go to the next one, and I'll think, okay, you're using words to make it sound bad, but all he did was get rid of racism.

01:07:52.840 Why are you making it sound bad?

01:07:55.840 So Axios is trying pretty hard, and MSNBC is trying harder, but everything's pointing in one direction at this point.

01:08:06.840 I think DEI is on its way out.

01:08:08.840 So Bill Ackman tried to dump on it.

01:08:12.840 Elon Musk is dumping on it.

01:08:13.840 I'm dumping on it.

01:08:15.840 Vivek, Ramaswamy, Trump, probably DeSantis, they're all dumping on it.

01:08:20.840 So DEI looks bad.

01:08:23.840 Now, let's talk about Rob Reiner, who got up early this morning and said this.

01:08:30.840 So ask yourself why a Hollywood power broker would get up and need to tweet this, because

01:08:40.840 it's something you've never heard before.

01:08:42.840 All right, here it is.

01:08:44.840 Rob Reiner.

01:08:45.840 The fact that Trump lies as easily as he breathes doesn't change the fact that he led a violent insurrection to overthrow the United States government.

01:08:54.840 American democracy will not survive with him in the White House.

01:08:58.840 Now, what did he add to the public discourse with that?

01:09:03.840 Nothing.

01:09:04.840 It's just stuff he says.

01:09:06.840 So it referenced no new information, and it's sort of generic.

01:09:14.840 Now, let me ask you this.

01:09:16.840 You're all aware that the CIA used to co-opt Hollywood power brokers to make movies and TV shows and stuff that would show the United States in a good light.

01:09:28.840 And, you know, would be the brainwashing of the country.

01:09:33.840 Now, do you think that was stopped?

01:09:36.840 Do you think they maybe still do it or no?

01:09:40.840 Why would it stop?

01:09:42.840 Why would it stop?

01:09:44.840 It's not illegal, apparently.

01:09:46.840 It's still legal.

01:09:47.840 Why would it stop?

01:09:49.840 It worked before.

01:09:51.840 Now, I'm going to read this again, and I'm going to ask you to listen to it this time and ask yourself, is this a man who deeply believes this and just needs to say it over and over again?

01:10:05.840 Or does it look like he's doing it as a job?

01:10:11.840 Let me read it and see if this sounds like somebody speaking from the heart or somebody who was paid to complain about Trump nonstop.

01:10:20.840 I'll read it again.

01:10:21.840 I'll read it again.

01:10:22.840 The fact that Trump lies as easily as he breathes doesn't change the fact that he led a violent insurrection to overthrow the United States government.

01:10:29.840 American democracy will not survive with him in the White House.

01:10:33.840 Doesn't that sound like a job?

01:10:35.840 It has that feeling to it, doesn't it?

01:10:39.840 Like he just woke up and got a paycheck.

01:10:44.840 Now, I doubt he's being paid because the same reason I doubt that Epstein got paid.

01:10:50.840 It's not a paycheck situation.

01:10:52.840 But if I were going to pick one person in Hollywood, I could blackmail.

01:10:59.840 Just saying.

01:11:05.840 All right.

01:11:08.840 Let's see.

01:11:10.840 So Biden's new ad is that a bunch of extremists in the country.

01:11:16.840 But by the extremists, he means mega people. 1.00

01:11:19.840 So Joe Biden is basically saying half of the country are insurrectionist assholes. 0.99

01:11:24.840 And that's how he's running. 1.00

01:11:26.840 He's running by saying half of the country are assholes, basically. 1.00

01:11:29.840 Now, I keep pointing this out. 1.00

01:11:33.840 But the more obvious it gets, like everybody's going to see it.

01:11:38.840 When Republicans talk about politics, usually they're talking about policy.

01:11:44.840 Usually.

01:11:45.840 There could be exceptions.

01:11:47.840 When Democrats talk about politics, they're talking about people.

01:11:51.840 Right.

01:11:53.840 So the Republicans will say, hey, your border asylum policy is a bad policy.

01:12:00.840 They'll say, oh, your abortion laws, we think they should change. 0.67

01:12:04.840 They should change.

01:12:06.840 But when Biden talks about politics, he says, all of you Republicans are like mega extremists.

01:12:15.840 Not all of them, but that's sort of implied.

01:12:18.840 Now, you see it, right?

01:12:20.840 Democrats talk about people and Republicans talk about policies.

01:12:25.840 If that was the only thing you knew, it would be a no brainer who you vote for.

01:12:31.840 Why would you vote for the one who is just bitching about people instead of the one who has an idea how to change a policy? 1.00

01:12:37.840 I mean, you see Vivek talk and he says, yeah, I'm going to cut the FBI by 80%.

01:12:43.840 I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education.

01:12:46.840 I'm going to pardon the January 6 people. 1.00

01:12:50.840 I'm going to start drilling.

01:12:52.840 It's just policy, policy, policy.

01:12:55.840 And then when a Democrat asks him a question, she asks him about if he'll deny white supremacy,

01:13:02.840 which is really a clever way to blame Republicans of being white supremacists.

01:13:09.840 That's all they got.

01:13:12.840 Now, why do you think it is that Democrats talk about people and Republicans talk about policy?

01:13:19.840 It's obvious.

01:13:22.840 Only one of them has good policies.

01:13:24.840 That's it.

01:13:26.840 Now, what is the exception?

01:13:28.840 There's one real big exception.

01:13:31.840 Abortion.

01:13:32.840 Why do Democrats talk about policy when they talk about abortion? 0.53

01:13:37.840 They're really about policy when they talk about that.

01:13:40.840 You know why?

01:13:42.840 Because in their opinion, they have a good argument.

01:13:45.840 Right?

01:13:46.840 Republicans would say no, but in their opinion, they have a good argument.

01:13:50.840 So why does Biden have to go after MAGA people instead of talking about policies?

01:13:58.840 Because he doesn't have any good policies.

01:14:01.840 Abortion is one he can talk about, but you know, it's not really the president's job.

01:14:06.840 It's not even part of the job.

01:14:07.840 That's now moved to the states.

01:14:12.840 So look for that pattern.

01:14:14.840 Look for the pattern of Democrats demonizing Republicans and Republicans trying desperately

01:14:19.840 to talk about, hey, can we change this border policy?

01:14:22.840 Can we change this tax thing?

01:14:24.840 Can we get rid of this war? 0.76

01:14:27.840 Yeah.

01:14:28.840 Very much policy versus people.

01:14:31.840 Speaking of that, Ibram Kendi, famous anti-racist, racist.

01:14:36.840 He asked this about the resignation of Harvard's president.

01:14:41.840 He says, the question is whether all these people would have investigated, surveilled, harassed,

01:14:47.840 written about, and attacked her in the same way if the Harvard president in this case would have been white.

01:14:55.840 Do you think the attacking from the right would have been quite as bad if she'd been white? 0.55

01:15:02.840 What do you think?

01:15:04.840 No, I agree with him.

01:15:06.840 It wouldn't have been nearly as bad if she had been white. 0.98

01:15:10.840 Do you know why?

01:15:12.840 His shoes attacked for two reasons.

01:15:14.840 One was being a diversity hire.

01:15:17.840 And the other was for plagiarism and saying the wrong stuff about Israel and Hamas.

01:15:23.840 Yes. 0.98

01:15:24.840 There was much more energy to get refired because she's a black and a woman who wasn't capable. 1.00

01:15:33.840 Like, if you don't add the, and she didn't seem qualified, then it's a different thing, right? 0.93

01:15:40.840 But I completely agree that a lot of the energy and the heat was very much because she was black and female. 0.88

01:15:49.840 But that's the problem. 0.90

01:15:51.840 The problem is that she was black and female and got promoted, apparently, over a lot of more qualified people. 0.93

01:15:58.840 So, yes. 0.95

01:15:59.840 Because she's black and female, there was more energy to get rid of her. 1.00

01:16:03.840 Because she was, got there, you know, the wrong way. 0.76

01:16:08.840 So, he's half right.

01:16:10.840 All right.

01:16:13.840 People who were speaking on about DEI just today.

01:16:16.840 Bill Ackman, Konstantin Kissin, Michael Schirmer, the Wall Street Journal, you know, me, Musk.

01:16:28.840 So, we're definitely at some kind of a major turning point where people can just say directly this DEI stuff is poison.

01:16:37.840 So, we've got to get rid of it.

01:16:42.840 Let me ask you this.

01:16:43.840 Have you ever heard of a story where DEI was cut in a company and then the company regretted it and they had to reverse their decision and add back that DEI staff?

01:16:54.840 Do you think you'll ever hear of it?

01:16:57.840 I have a prediction that there might be a company that cuts their DEI and then has to add it back.

01:17:04.840 But it would be because of complaints.

01:17:06.840 It wouldn't be because they lost money.

01:17:09.840 So, I don't think it's a two-way street.

01:17:13.840 I think that when they start cutting the DEI, they're not going to add it back.

01:17:18.840 I mean, I feel like the cutting is the future.

01:17:21.840 So, read the room.

01:17:24.840 There's more stories about DEI being bad and zero companies saying it's working, at least in terms of profitability.

01:17:36.840 All right.

01:17:37.840 So, how many of you know that President Trump released a gigantic statement with lots of details about the election fraud he claims in the 2020 election?

01:17:48.840 It's really long.

01:17:49.840 It's really long.

01:17:51.840 I thought about how could I talk about it.

01:17:55.840 But it's way too long.

01:17:57.840 So, I'll give you the gist of it.

01:17:59.840 So, he goes through the battleground states and he lists in quite a bit of detail the claims of irregularities and or fraud.

01:18:12.840 And for each of the states that are the battlegrounds, I think he covered them all, there are tremendous claims.

01:18:21.840 Now, I'm going to say allegations because I cannot determine what is true and what is not.

01:18:26.840 But, boy, is it effective.

01:18:29.840 Boy, is it effective.

01:18:31.840 Here's why.

01:18:32.840 Number one, the documentary effect.

01:18:35.840 His claims are so extensive that you end up spending a lot of time going through them, like I did this morning.

01:18:44.840 If you spend a lot of time looking through the details of one narrative, the narrative being the election was rigged, you are going to be convinced of whatever the documentary maker wants you to think.

01:19:01.840 So, it is the nature of a documentary, if it takes one position, and usually they do, that they don't show you the other argument.

01:19:09.840 And at the end of the documentary, you're going to be 100% convinced that whatever that documentary said is true.

01:19:15.840 But, five minutes later, if you saw a documentary that took the other position, you'd be just as convinced of the opposite.

01:19:24.840 Because that's how documentaries work.

01:19:26.840 If you could make somebody sit for an hour, an hour, you know, to look at one point of view, they usually do walk away believing it.

01:19:34.840 It's just too much of one point of view.

01:19:37.840 It overwhelms your critical thinking.

01:19:39.840 You just say, alright, alright, there's so much here, it must be true.

01:19:42.840 It doesn't mean it's true.

01:19:44.840 It just means there's a lot of it.

01:19:46.840 Now, closely related to the documentary effect, which is a name I came up with, is the laundry list persuasion.

01:19:55.840 Laundry list persuasion says, oh, I've got 15 things that Trump did wrong.

01:20:02.840 And you say to yourself, well, a quick perusal of your list, you know, I could pick out three right away that are definitely not true.

01:20:11.840 But I don't really have time to look into the whole list.

01:20:16.840 So I end up walking away and saying to myself, well, I'm sure they're not all true on that list.

01:20:22.840 But the list is so long.

01:20:24.840 There's probably something on there that's true.

01:20:27.840 So a laundry list is persuasive for the wrong reason.

01:20:31.840 It's not persuasive because the stuff on it is persuasive.

01:20:35.840 It's persuasive because it's long.

01:20:37.840 And you say to yourself, irrationally, but you say to yourself, well, with this much smoke, you know, there must be at least one thing that's true on this big old list, right?

01:20:48.840 So Trump is using both the documentary effect, because it takes so long to, you know, work with it, plus the laundry list effect, because there are so many different claims.

01:21:00.840 Now, you put those together, and the effect that I had when I looked through it was, I concluded that there's a 100% chance the election was rigged.

01:21:13.840 But is that true?

01:21:16.840 I don't know.

01:21:18.840 I actually don't know.

01:21:20.840 And I'm sufficiently self-aware that I know I was brainwashed by looking at the material.

01:21:28.840 Brainwashed.

01:21:29.840 Brainwashed.

01:21:30.840 Do you think that I could tell even one of those claims whether it was credible or not true?

01:21:36.840 I couldn't.

01:21:37.840 Not one of them.

01:21:38.840 There were tons and tons of claims, and honestly, they all look pretty good.

01:21:43.840 But I don't know.

01:21:46.840 Do you know?

01:21:49.840 Who knows?

01:21:50.840 How would you know?

01:21:53.840 Now, I'm more and more convinced, especially when I see Trump's list of claims.

01:21:59.840 I'm more and more convinced that what happened to Sidney Powell, with the whole Kraken business and the Venezuelan general who allegedly knew some things.

01:22:10.840 I'm convinced that was an op, and that the purpose of it was to give her the most ridiculous claim, and then if she went public with it, it would undermine all of her other allegations, which is exactly what happened.

01:22:25.840 If you mention Sidney Powell, somebody will say Kraken within five seconds.

01:22:31.840 It's the first thing you think of.

01:22:33.840 So it obliterated her credibility, and we never heard where she got that from, did we?

01:22:40.840 Isn't that the weirdest thing?

01:22:43.840 Dog not barking.

01:22:44.840 Don't you think at some point Sidney Powell should have said, okay, I was wrong, but this is where I got it from.

01:22:53.840 Where's that?

01:22:55.840 Why doesn't she say where she got it from?

01:22:59.840 Yeah.

01:23:00.840 I think the reason is she may know that somebody set her up.

01:23:05.840 I think she knows she got set up.

01:23:08.840 And she may have a reason not to want to out him, but she probably thinks she was set up at this point.

01:23:15.840 And it looks to me like if the stuff on Trump's list of irregularities, if any of that is true, it would suggest that they had to do an op to remove from credibility anybody who was looking into it with any capability.

01:23:33.840 And it looks like that's what happened.

01:23:35.840 Now, I can't say for sure, but if you told me what's it look like, it looks like the election was rigged.

01:23:42.840 It looks like Sidney Powell was getting too close to the truth.

01:23:46.840 And they fed her a Kraken op, and she bit, and then it took her out of contention.

01:23:53.840 And then nobody else wanted to follow that path because she got so completely destroyed, her career was destroyed, that nobody wanted to go down that path.

01:24:03.840 So they basically poisoned the entire field, and it worked.

01:24:09.840 That's what it looks like to me.

01:24:10.840 Now, let me say again, since I cannot confirm or debunk any of Trump's claims, I'll just say it's a really long, convincing-looking list.

01:24:22.840 I just don't know if it's true.

01:24:25.840 But here's my take on the election rigging.

01:24:31.840 I don't know if it happened.

01:24:33.840 I have no proof.

01:24:34.840 But we do observe that every other institution and entity, government and private in the United States, is clearly corrupt.

01:24:45.840 Clearly corrupt.

01:24:48.840 Why would all 50 state elections be the only things that work right?

01:24:54.840 Really?

01:24:55.840 The only things?

01:24:57.840 That is so not believable.

01:25:00.840 It's completely unbelievable that everything was corrupt except the elections.

01:25:05.840 That's not believable.

01:25:07.840 Not even a little bit.

01:25:08.840 But I'll say again, I don't have any proof.

01:25:11.840 Now, but I'll tell you what I do have proof of.

01:25:15.840 Here's what I'm going to move from, I suspected it, to now I'm positive.

01:25:22.840 This election was never audited.

01:25:27.840 Can we all say that for sure?

01:25:32.840 Not only was it never audited, because all of this stuff came up afterwards.

01:25:36.840 Not only was it never audited, that Trump's list of irregularities proves to me beyond any doubt, I now have no doubt, that our elections are designed, not accidental, designed to not be auditable fully.

01:25:58.840 Clearly there are some things you can check.

01:26:01.840 But not enough.

01:26:02.840 Because if any of these claims are true, these are all things that no audit caught.

01:26:07.840 Until well after it was too late to do anything about it.

01:26:11.840 So, that's fun.

01:26:15.840 All right.

01:26:16.840 That, ladies and gentlemen, is all I have for today's amazing livestream.

01:26:20.840 The best thing you've ever seen.

01:26:21.840 The best thing you ever will see.

01:26:23.840 Thanks for joining on YouTube.

01:26:26.840 I always appreciate you.

01:26:27.840 And I will see you in the morning tomorrow.

01:26:30.840 Be here.

01:26:31.840 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 04, 2024

Episode 2343 CWSA 01⧸04⧸24 News So Juicy I Can't Mention It In This Title. It's That Good!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript