Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 07, 2024


Episode 2346 CWSA 01⧸07⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per Minute

142.1793

Word Count

10,188

Sentence Count

742

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

24


Summary

In this episode, Scott Adams talks about the term "Dementia Hitler" and how it went viral after it was used in a Joe Biden speech. He also talks about AI and why fiction writers should be worried about it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Come on YouTube. 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
00:00:13.240 Good morning everybody and welcome.
00:00:21.260 The Coffee with Scott Adams is the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:24.160 And if you would like to take this experience up to levels which, I don't know, I don't think any of us can even imagine,
00:00:32.780 all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass, a tankard chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:40.260 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:42.860 I like coffee.
00:00:44.260 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:47.100 It's the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:50.060 It's called The Simultaneous Sip and it happens now.
00:00:58.020 Ah.
00:00:59.680 That was glorious, really.
00:01:02.480 I almost feel like I need another one.
00:01:05.100 Anybody?
00:01:06.660 Double sip.
00:01:07.860 Double sip.
00:01:09.380 Go.
00:01:12.640 Yeah, I needed that.
00:01:14.540 I could not go on without that extra caffeine.
00:01:16.820 But now, we're ready for the best show that's ever been.
00:01:23.040 Would anybody like to give me a hearty thank you for making the term Dementia Hitler trend for 48 hours on X?
00:01:34.340 Anybody?
00:01:35.680 Would anybody like to thank me for that?
00:01:38.220 Yeah.
00:01:38.940 Yeah, I did that.
00:01:39.760 You know, it's funny.
00:01:43.280 The Dementia Hitler, you never know what's going to catch on.
00:01:49.780 It's not like it's the first time I tried to make something catchy.
00:01:53.680 But it doesn't always work.
00:01:55.700 And I don't always know why it doesn't work.
00:01:57.920 But sometimes you know it does and sometimes it doesn't.
00:02:00.220 So I was just looking at Biden giving his speech.
00:02:05.140 And the term just popped into my head.
00:02:08.160 Just fully formed.
00:02:09.680 I just saw Dementia Hitler.
00:02:12.400 So I wrote it down.
00:02:14.040 And when I wrote it down, I said to myself,
00:02:16.360 That's kind of sticky.
00:02:18.320 But I had no idea that it would be trending for two days.
00:02:22.000 So far.
00:02:22.800 My goal is to get Trump to use the phrase Dementia Hitler.
00:02:29.940 I don't think he will.
00:02:31.840 Because it's not his own.
00:02:34.280 But we'll see.
00:02:36.820 So I wonder, you know, after a big speech like Joe Biden did on January 6th,
00:02:44.760 do you think that afterwards he talks to his staff and says,
00:02:48.420 Hey, how'd it go?
00:02:50.740 How do you think I did?
00:02:51.580 And they're like, well, well, you know, you're fine.
00:02:56.740 You're fine.
00:02:57.300 I know, but what's the feedback?
00:02:59.480 You know, what is social media saying about my speech?
00:03:02.460 Well, well, many of your supporters liked it a lot.
00:03:06.560 Okay, I know the supporters are going to like it.
00:03:08.620 What about the, you know, the other people?
00:03:11.200 Well, you're trending on X.
00:03:14.940 Excellent.
00:03:15.920 Excellent.
00:03:16.560 That's what I was hoping for.
00:03:18.560 What's it say?
00:03:19.380 Well, what's trending is the phrase Dementia Hitler.
00:03:24.540 So that's how your speech went.
00:03:27.340 There you go.
00:03:29.360 All right.
00:03:29.920 In other news, Microsoft and OpenAI are being sued by some authors of nonfiction books.
00:03:38.680 And the idea is that the AI is scraping their work and it's getting it in some way that they say is a violation of copyright.
00:03:49.940 Now, I've heard that the fiction writers separately were trying to do something legally as well.
00:03:58.180 But I don't really understand why that makes sense.
00:04:00.720 If you write a work of fiction, isn't the value of the book the exact wording and your phrases and your sentences?
00:04:11.900 It's not like AI is going to reproduce that.
00:04:15.100 I mean, it might do a sentence or something as a quote, but it's not going to reproduce the book for free.
00:04:19.900 And I can't really summarize it because a summary of a fiction book is nothing.
00:04:27.660 You know, summarize Romeo and Juliet.
00:04:30.760 Well, two lovers, you know, they had trouble getting together.
00:04:35.120 Families didn't like each other.
00:04:36.800 Ended up committing suicide.
00:04:40.540 Fiction, fiction by its design can't be summarized.
00:04:44.820 So I'm not exactly sure what the fiction writers have to worry about with AI.
00:04:50.200 But I'll tell you that nonfiction writers have a lot to worry.
00:04:53.720 And I'm one of those.
00:04:55.900 So in addition to Dilbert-y jokes, which would be fiction, my latest books are all nonfiction.
00:05:04.600 Reframe Your Brain, the book that is changing lives all over the world right now, is nonfiction.
00:05:10.960 Now, I'm going to tell you something that I probably shouldn't tell you.
00:05:16.720 You can get a summary of most books just by asking AI.
00:05:22.220 It'll tell you the basic idea.
00:05:24.700 And the thing that I shouldn't tell you, as a fiction writer, I'm kind of being disloyal to my people,
00:05:31.240 is that most nonfiction books can be summarized just fine.
00:05:35.340 Most nonfiction books can be summarized by AI just fine.
00:05:43.340 In fact, I use ChatGPT in voice mode, where you can just talk to it anytime you want.
00:05:50.160 You don't have to use any wake-up terms.
00:05:54.720 You just start talking.
00:05:56.220 You can have a conversation with it on anything.
00:05:59.620 So the other day I was driving and listening to my AI, and there was a book.
00:06:03.480 I'm not going to mention the book, because I think it would be unfair in this context.
00:06:08.640 But there's a very well-known business book that I had not read, but I felt bad because I should.
00:06:15.980 You know, there's some books you kind of have to read to be considered up-to-date on what's going on.
00:06:22.220 And I said to myself, well, AI, can you summarize that book?
00:06:25.500 And I did.
00:06:25.920 And I went away feeling that I didn't really need to see anymore.
00:06:32.060 The summary was sufficient.
00:06:36.700 You know, I asked questions, which is the way I like to learn.
00:06:40.420 I like to get the general idea of something and then ask a question.
00:06:44.200 It's like, well, does that include this?
00:06:45.960 And how do you define that?
00:06:47.720 And, you know, that sort of thing.
00:06:48.860 So I had some questions.
00:06:49.820 But basically, I saved myself four hours of reading a book, and I don't think I lost anything.
00:07:00.180 I feel like I got exactly everything I needed from the summary.
00:07:04.600 Now, can you do that to my books?
00:07:07.880 That would be your next question, right?
00:07:10.400 Can AI summarize my books, because they're also nonfiction?
00:07:14.520 It's factual stuff.
00:07:16.720 And the answer is no.
00:07:17.920 Well, you can't summarize them.
00:07:20.960 And the reason you can't summarize mine is that I write it with persuasion techniques,
00:07:27.480 which if you take the persuasion out, you would have a description of tools that nobody would use.
00:07:34.820 Let me say it again.
00:07:36.320 When I write a book of fiction, it's usually stuff that I think would make your life better.
00:07:43.600 But only if you do it.
00:07:45.700 Only if you do it.
00:07:47.920 Reading about it isn't going to do anything for you.
00:07:50.720 So I combine in my nonfiction books the type of text that would persuade you to maybe try it.
00:07:59.040 If you summarize my book, you would take the persuasion out.
00:08:03.160 You'd say, well, he says do this and this and that.
00:08:05.460 You wouldn't do it.
00:08:06.820 You absolutely would not do it because you heard a summary.
00:08:09.620 So if you summarize my book, you lose most of the value, because it'd be a bunch of stuff you don't try.
00:08:19.220 Now, there are two ways to convince people to do stuff.
00:08:22.880 One is to show them some science, which sometimes can convince people.
00:08:26.920 I use more story form because stories are more persuasive.
00:08:33.540 So if I say I had this experience and I know three people that have this experience, you're probably more persuaded than if I said there was a meta-analysis or something that you didn't trust anyway.
00:08:45.000 So don't take the persuasion out.
00:08:47.700 But these authors are suing OpenAI and they're asking for $150,000 a piece for what?
00:08:55.740 All fiction, nonfiction authors that become part of it?
00:09:00.920 I don't know.
00:09:01.940 Does that sound fair?
00:09:02.740 Do you think ChatGPT should be allowed to essentially steal and summarize your book if they gave you $150,000 once?
00:09:16.560 That's probably 99% of writers would say that was the best deal they ever saw in their life.
00:09:22.000 And 1% would say, that's way less than my book is worth.
00:09:26.520 I don't know.
00:09:27.080 We'll find out what the courts say about this.
00:09:29.000 Well, there's a big problem with insuring homes, if you didn't know.
00:09:35.140 Some of it seems to be getting blamed on climate change, which I believe is bullshit.
00:09:42.100 But there are other reasons as well.
00:09:44.220 One reason is people keep building in dangerous places.
00:09:47.980 So the more expensive homes you build on the coast of Florida, the more it's going to cost you for insurance.
00:09:53.940 In California, our version of that is, if you build your expensive new McMansion in an area that's close to a forest that's poorly managed, your house might burn up.
00:10:08.580 And your insurance company knows that now.
00:10:10.740 So they're not going to give you insurance.
00:10:12.500 They're going to say, nope, we don't want to take the risk of insuring your $3 million McMansion next to this forest that will probably burn down in the next five years.
00:10:23.940 So it's a real big problem.
00:10:25.800 If you can't get insurance, the entire housing industry dies.
00:10:30.780 And if you have to pay so much for it, the rates are going up as much as 50% since the last few years.
00:10:40.500 Your home insurance is up about 50%, which is something that every voter with a home is going to notice if they haven't insured.
00:10:50.040 You're definitely going to notice that.
00:10:53.800 So we'll keep an eye on that.
00:10:57.220 But here's what I think will happen.
00:10:59.760 I think that the market will adjust.
00:11:02.800 Because our markets are flexible enough that somebody is going to figure out how to build a home that doesn't get destroyed by a hurricane.
00:11:10.980 Right?
00:11:12.000 That's all it would take.
00:11:13.100 You just have to build a home that won't burn down and won't be destroyed by a hurricane, which can be done.
00:11:21.700 Can be done.
00:11:22.860 So you just need more of those, I think.
00:11:27.940 Yeah.
00:11:29.880 Anyway.
00:11:31.460 So where are people moving to?
00:11:36.840 This is an interesting article in the New York Post.
00:11:39.100 I was kind of interested in it.
00:11:40.320 You always hear about California and Florida and Texas.
00:11:44.740 But apparently the places people are moving to most are Vermont and South Carolina.
00:11:52.100 Did you know that?
00:11:53.680 That the states with the most incoming are Vermont and South Carolina?
00:11:59.500 Bernie Sanders is a little Vermont.
00:12:02.120 It's very popular.
00:12:02.940 Now, I feel like the Vermont people are, some of them are, you know, just going for a simpler lifestyle and they like the scenery and stuff.
00:12:12.900 But don't you think a lot of the people moving to Vermont are saying, get me out of the city?
00:12:19.280 Doesn't it feel like people are escaping for their own safety, at least to some extent?
00:12:24.260 Maybe lower cost of living as well.
00:12:26.880 I couldn't put up in the snow, but South Carolina is the other place.
00:12:30.500 What do Vermont and South Carolina have in common?
00:12:36.820 Anybody?
00:12:38.260 What do Vermont and South Carolina have in common?
00:12:44.460 Maybe nothing?
00:12:46.640 Lower cost of living?
00:12:49.140 Maybe a lower cost of living.
00:12:51.240 And I hear South Carolina is really beautiful.
00:12:54.120 Isn't there the most livable city in the country is in South Carolina?
00:12:59.800 Or is it North Carolina?
00:13:01.660 Is it Greenville or something?
00:13:03.500 Where's Greenville?
00:13:05.120 South Carolina?
00:13:06.760 North?
00:13:10.040 All right.
00:13:11.500 So wherever that is.
00:13:14.020 And the people are moving away from California, New Jersey, Illinois, and Michigan.
00:13:20.260 Did you know that?
00:13:21.300 You probably knew about California, but did you know people are moving out of New Jersey, Illinois, and Michigan?
00:13:26.620 I wonder if those are all high-tax states.
00:13:29.900 Does anybody know?
00:13:34.840 Greenville is in both.
00:13:37.220 Oh.
00:13:37.680 So there's a Greenville in both North and South Carolina.
00:13:40.860 But I'm told the good one is in South Carolina.
00:13:44.200 The good one.
00:13:45.420 How would you like to be the bad Greenville?
00:13:46.980 Well, it's probably pretty good, too, but there's one that's better.
00:13:51.720 All right.
00:13:52.320 There's a big story in the Wall Street Journal about how investors and people are worried about Elon Musk's illegal drug use.
00:14:01.620 Now, before I tell you this whole story about people all upset about Elon Musk's illegal drug use,
00:14:08.920 here's what you need to know.
00:14:10.260 Well, three years ago, after, this is what Musk himself says on X.
00:14:18.920 He said, after one puff with Rogan, meaning one puff of marijuana,
00:14:23.420 I agreed at NASA's request to do three years of random drug testing.
00:14:28.780 Not even trace quantities were found of any drug or alcohol.
00:14:33.740 Or alcohol.
00:14:37.860 Nothing.
00:14:39.100 In three years.
00:14:40.260 So, three years of total cleanness.
00:14:46.220 And the Wall Street Journal writes a long article about how everybody's worried about his drug use.
00:14:52.360 It's going to ruin everything.
00:14:54.620 Now, what would you call that?
00:14:57.340 Is that news?
00:14:59.340 Does that look like valuable news that you need to know?
00:15:03.800 No.
00:15:04.920 This is clearly a hit piece from the Wall Street Journal.
00:15:08.740 Now, I do expect more from the Wall Street Journal, I have to admit.
00:15:14.100 I expect better than this.
00:15:17.620 I think the Wall Street Journal is typically much better than this.
00:15:21.200 This is despicable.
00:15:23.500 It's despicable.
00:15:25.140 Now, I think Musk does, you know, everything that needs to be done to debunk it,
00:15:31.340 just by saying that he's been tested for three years and he doesn't have even trace quantities,
00:15:37.460 including alcohol.
00:15:38.540 Now, does Elon Musk not drink?
00:15:44.100 Is that a thing?
00:15:44.980 Does anybody know?
00:15:47.100 Because I'd be very impressed if that's the case.
00:15:50.220 Does he not even have a casual drink?
00:15:52.780 And the reason I ask is because there are a lot of very influential people,
00:15:58.460 more of them I see in the political right,
00:16:01.720 who have stopped drinking and they like to let you know publicly,
00:16:05.040 I'm one of those people.
00:16:07.200 And it feels like that trend is really increasing.
00:16:10.780 Have you seen it as well?
00:16:12.060 Well, the number of public figures who say they don't drink anything,
00:16:17.340 you know, such as me.
00:16:19.920 Yeah.
00:16:20.980 Anyway, I'd love to know if he is just off of alcohol or they didn't find any
00:16:27.060 because it doesn't stay in your system that long.
00:16:29.080 I don't know which one it is.
00:16:31.240 But here's the thing you need to know.
00:16:32.940 So I added this to the argument.
00:16:34.680 And this is one of the things I can say because I'm canceled and disgraced.
00:16:43.100 So this free speech stuff is just terrific.
00:16:46.640 I got to tell you, my enjoyment of social media
00:16:50.680 and just being able to talk in public in general
00:16:54.220 is about 120% better than it was last year.
00:16:59.160 Because here's a topic that I can tell you without any hesitation
00:17:03.040 that I don't know if I would have done even a year ago.
00:17:07.160 And it goes like this.
00:17:08.780 I'm going to tell you a big secret of Silicon Valley
00:17:11.140 and perhaps American industry in general,
00:17:14.820 but I know less about that.
00:17:17.020 And it's this.
00:17:19.880 In the normal world,
00:17:22.580 both the successful people and the unsuccessful people
00:17:25.980 are doing a lot of drugs,
00:17:28.000 including alcohol and tobacco.
00:17:31.080 A lot of drugs.
00:17:33.040 But what's the difference between the super successful people
00:17:35.820 and the people who become addicts and street people
00:17:39.020 and they lose their jobs and their family and everything?
00:17:42.680 What's the difference?
00:17:44.360 Well, nobody's going to tell you this,
00:17:46.400 except me,
00:17:47.580 because you just aren't allowed to say this out loud.
00:17:50.740 I'm going to tell you something out loud
00:17:53.120 that I believe is known to everybody in Silicon Valley,
00:17:57.880 but you've never seen an article on it.
00:18:00.460 Or at least I haven't.
00:18:01.240 Maybe somebody has written one.
00:18:02.900 It goes like this.
00:18:05.120 It is inaccurate and maybe misleading
00:18:08.000 to say there's people on drugs
00:18:10.960 and then people not on drugs.
00:18:13.880 And that the people not on drugs
00:18:15.560 are operating efficiently and getting stuff done.
00:18:18.020 And the people on drugs are all a mess.
00:18:21.560 In a general way,
00:18:23.420 I would agree you should stay off drugs.
00:18:26.040 In a general way,
00:18:27.940 it's better not to do any.
00:18:30.300 In just sort of an overall general way.
00:18:33.760 However,
00:18:34.620 we live in a world where no two people are the same.
00:18:37.240 Your reaction to,
00:18:40.220 let's say,
00:18:40.660 a drink of alcohol
00:18:41.580 might be completely different
00:18:42.840 than someone else's.
00:18:45.000 And the same goes for the other drugs.
00:18:47.760 But more to the point,
00:18:49.300 beyond the individual differences,
00:18:51.340 is that the drugs that people choose
00:18:53.700 have very different characteristics.
00:18:56.240 There are drugs which primarily,
00:18:59.520 if used correctly,
00:19:00.860 can enhance your performance
00:19:02.860 that are illegal.
00:19:05.520 There are drugs which,
00:19:07.280 if used even correctly,
00:19:09.760 will degrade your performance
00:19:11.380 and there's no way around it.
00:19:13.380 Right?
00:19:14.160 If you're taking too much Klonopin
00:19:16.660 or you're drinking
00:19:17.840 or you're,
00:19:19.100 I don't know,
00:19:20.700 probably heroin or something,
00:19:22.580 not going to help.
00:19:23.740 That's not making you
00:19:27.480 able to make rocket ships.
00:19:29.520 If you're shooting fentanyl in your arm,
00:19:32.360 you're not making car companies
00:19:33.820 and rocket companies.
00:19:35.900 That's the wrong choice of drug.
00:19:38.340 If you're drinking all day long,
00:19:40.500 sometimes you could be a functional alcoholic.
00:19:42.780 There are lots of them.
00:19:44.020 But it's probably not helping you.
00:19:45.440 It may be something you're managing.
00:19:48.820 But it's not making you better at your job.
00:19:51.820 However,
00:19:52.300 there are a number of drugs
00:19:55.460 and most of them were named
00:19:57.260 in the Wall Street Journal article
00:19:59.260 that are closer to performance enhancers
00:20:02.480 than performance herders.
00:20:07.040 One of them that's closer to an enhancer
00:20:09.360 is mushrooms and LSD
00:20:11.140 and psychedelics in general.
00:20:14.040 Now,
00:20:14.520 I want to be really as precise
00:20:16.620 as I can about this.
00:20:18.160 For some number of people
00:20:19.740 doing hallucinogenics
00:20:22.080 could be terrible.
00:20:24.260 Could be.
00:20:25.700 You could overdo it.
00:20:27.640 I imagine there's all kinds of risks.
00:20:29.860 So I don't recommend it.
00:20:31.840 And in general,
00:20:32.660 I'm not going to recommend
00:20:33.700 that anybody do any of the drugs
00:20:36.220 that I'm about to mention.
00:20:37.700 Don't drink alcohol.
00:20:38.900 Don't smoke cigarettes.
00:20:40.240 Don't do weed.
00:20:41.120 Even if I say I do.
00:20:42.600 Don't do it.
00:20:43.620 Because I'm not a doctor
00:20:44.600 and I do it for medicinal purposes.
00:20:49.380 But,
00:20:49.960 it must be said
00:20:51.760 that a lot of the greatest accomplishments
00:20:55.240 probably depended on psychedelics.
00:20:57.780 I'm going to say this
00:21:00.400 as firmly as possible.
00:21:03.440 Probably a lot
00:21:05.040 of the biggest accomplishments
00:21:06.680 in American tech
00:21:08.960 were from people
00:21:10.620 who were on
00:21:11.260 the right kind of drugs
00:21:12.700 and in the right way.
00:21:14.780 Meaning
00:21:15.220 that the psychedelics
00:21:16.940 may have
00:21:17.460 cured their mental illness
00:21:19.460 so that they could go on
00:21:21.380 to better performance.
00:21:22.880 It may have made them
00:21:24.140 more open-minded.
00:21:25.300 It may have
00:21:27.420 simply made their life better
00:21:29.320 so that they could
00:21:30.080 put more gusto
00:21:31.400 into what they're doing.
00:21:33.280 Now,
00:21:33.960 and again,
00:21:34.800 I'll keep repeating myself
00:21:36.180 because I don't want to make,
00:21:37.300 I want to make sure
00:21:37.800 I'm not confusing anybody.
00:21:41.160 All of the drugs I mentioned
00:21:42.640 could be devastating
00:21:43.680 to a person's life
00:21:44.860 and I don't recommend them
00:21:46.540 at all.
00:21:47.600 Period.
00:21:48.080 I don't recommend them.
00:21:50.200 But,
00:21:50.860 it is nonetheless true
00:21:52.080 that some number
00:21:53.560 of the greatest accomplishments
00:21:55.020 of the world
00:21:55.660 probably,
00:21:57.260 not probably,
00:21:58.420 certainly,
00:21:59.440 came from people
00:22:00.200 who had enhanced
00:22:01.000 their abilities
00:22:01.640 through some illegal drugs.
00:22:05.440 Suppose you knew
00:22:06.580 that somebody
00:22:07.180 was capable
00:22:08.120 of doing great things
00:22:09.640 if only they could
00:22:11.440 beat their depression.
00:22:14.220 And then they took
00:22:14.980 ketamine.
00:22:16.380 Ketamine?
00:22:17.140 Ketamine?
00:22:18.060 I always read it
00:22:19.640 but I never hear it.
00:22:20.760 Ketamine or ketamine?
00:22:22.800 It's one of those.
00:22:23.780 And suppose you took that
00:22:25.520 and suppose you did it
00:22:26.740 responsibly
00:22:27.520 and it helped you
00:22:29.260 with your mental health.
00:22:32.240 Well,
00:22:32.560 that frees you.
00:22:34.100 Now you can go
00:22:35.040 do those things.
00:22:36.500 But if you're just,
00:22:37.660 you know,
00:22:37.960 tortured by your mental health
00:22:39.700 and you don't know
00:22:41.420 what to do about it,
00:22:42.280 you've tried all the normal things,
00:22:43.800 therapy didn't work
00:22:44.760 and,
00:22:45.680 you know,
00:22:45.980 whatever.
00:22:46.900 Maybe,
00:22:47.960 maybe,
00:22:48.480 and again,
00:22:49.460 I'm not recommending this
00:22:51.040 so if you have
00:22:51.560 a mental health problem,
00:22:52.900 don't go take a bunch
00:22:53.760 of ketamine
00:22:54.220 because you heard it
00:22:54.860 on the live stream.
00:22:56.220 Be responsible.
00:22:58.040 Don't take drugs.
00:22:59.940 I'm just saying
00:23:00.980 that in the right situation,
00:23:04.280 that a smart person
00:23:05.640 can enhance
00:23:06.740 their capabilities
00:23:07.640 substantially.
00:23:09.260 And I won't go through
00:23:10.400 all the other drugs
00:23:11.500 and say
00:23:12.360 how it could be misused
00:23:14.020 but how somebody
00:23:14.860 might use it correctly.
00:23:16.300 I'm just saying
00:23:17.020 if you're doing
00:23:17.640 downers
00:23:19.120 that are making you
00:23:20.740 sleepy and stupid,
00:23:21.880 it's not helping you.
00:23:23.380 But if you're doing things
00:23:24.580 that expand your mind
00:23:25.800 and don't have
00:23:27.280 a lot of downside,
00:23:29.460 something that helps
00:23:30.160 your mental health,
00:23:32.260 something that makes you
00:23:33.960 more creative,
00:23:35.040 more energized,
00:23:36.320 more interested,
00:23:37.980 it would actually help.
00:23:40.600 Now,
00:23:41.060 when I saw that
00:23:42.000 Wall Street Journal
00:23:43.120 said the Elon Musk
00:23:44.000 has done
00:23:44.500 these following drugs
00:23:46.320 that reports say
00:23:48.420 at various parties
00:23:49.320 or something,
00:23:50.500 obviously not
00:23:51.180 in the last three years
00:23:52.100 but sometime in the past,
00:23:54.960 I say to myself,
00:23:55.960 can I get a list?
00:23:57.940 Can I get a list
00:23:58.980 of those drugs?
00:24:00.180 Because whatever
00:24:01.180 he's doing is working.
00:24:04.220 Is somebody suggesting
00:24:05.720 that if he had not done
00:24:07.920 those few party drugs
00:24:09.440 that were mentioned,
00:24:10.900 you know,
00:24:11.080 they were in the context
00:24:12.020 of a party?
00:24:13.360 If somebody suggested
00:24:14.360 that if he hadn't done it,
00:24:16.980 that SpaceX would be
00:24:19.380 doing much better?
00:24:22.660 Would he be selling
00:24:23.700 more Tesla cars
00:24:24.980 if he had not smoked
00:24:27.060 a joint with Joe Rogan?
00:24:29.740 I mean,
00:24:30.180 put any of this together
00:24:31.600 for me.
00:24:32.240 None of it makes sense.
00:24:33.400 It only makes sense
00:24:34.140 that the Wall Street Journal
00:24:35.140 is writing hippies.
00:24:36.220 All right,
00:24:38.460 moving on.
00:24:39.380 University of Utah
00:24:40.320 is removing
00:24:42.940 any DEI questions
00:24:44.940 and statements
00:24:45.640 because the government
00:24:47.820 of Utah said to.
00:24:49.980 And they're just getting
00:24:51.200 out of the DEI business,
00:24:52.900 apparently,
00:24:53.520 in University of Utah.
00:24:56.180 So,
00:24:57.360 let me ask you this.
00:24:59.900 Is the trend for DEI
00:25:01.660 certainly for less of it
00:25:04.440 or do you think
00:25:05.000 it's still expanding?
00:25:07.120 Do you think
00:25:07.560 there's more of it
00:25:08.360 or less of it
00:25:09.020 in the coming year?
00:25:11.020 I think it might be
00:25:12.380 bifurcated.
00:25:14.380 I think there might be
00:25:15.380 some really blue places
00:25:16.880 that get more of it,
00:25:18.180 but the red states
00:25:19.860 are definitely
00:25:20.360 getting rid of it.
00:25:21.940 Now,
00:25:22.140 what do you make
00:25:22.600 of the fact
00:25:23.120 that there's
00:25:24.020 a thing
00:25:25.600 that some states
00:25:27.220 think is so dangerous
00:25:28.320 it's illegal
00:25:29.060 and other states
00:25:30.820 say,
00:25:31.140 oh,
00:25:31.300 we need more of this?
00:25:33.480 It's almost like
00:25:34.460 some states
00:25:35.180 are passing a law
00:25:36.900 that says
00:25:37.280 you have to eat sugar
00:25:38.420 and other states
00:25:40.420 are passing laws
00:25:41.380 that say,
00:25:41.760 stay away from sugar,
00:25:42.660 it's bad for you.
00:25:44.260 And they both exist
00:25:45.460 at the same time.
00:25:46.340 Now,
00:25:48.460 I like the fact
00:25:49.920 that our 50 states
00:25:50.880 could be like
00:25:51.400 laboratories
00:25:52.140 for the republic,
00:25:53.740 but that doesn't
00:25:55.040 make any sense.
00:25:56.480 If there's a substantial
00:25:57.800 number of states
00:25:58.920 who say doing this
00:26:00.200 is actually bad for you
00:26:01.720 while other states
00:26:03.580 are saying it's good for you
00:26:04.800 and really,
00:26:05.360 really good for you,
00:26:06.400 I think we ought to
00:26:07.880 maybe come together
00:26:09.500 and have a convention
00:26:10.320 and hash that out.
00:26:12.580 Maybe that's not something
00:26:13.720 we should compete on.
00:26:16.340 Well,
00:26:17.360 Trump makes news again
00:26:19.160 for allegedly mocking
00:26:21.840 John McCain's
00:26:22.840 injuries from the war.
00:26:26.800 When he was talking
00:26:27.840 about Obamacare vote
00:26:29.600 and how John McCain
00:26:31.180 surprised people
00:26:32.760 by giving the thumbs down,
00:26:35.780 Trump said,
00:26:37.320 John McCain,
00:26:37.980 for some reason,
00:26:38.680 couldn't get his arm up
00:26:39.580 that day.
00:26:40.080 I remember a time
00:26:44.300 when this would be
00:26:45.940 big news
00:26:47.260 and everybody would be
00:26:50.600 shocked and offended.
00:26:53.000 It doesn't feel like that
00:26:54.480 anymore, does it?
00:26:57.020 Because once you know
00:26:58.220 Trump's act,
00:26:59.920 you just know he says
00:27:01.360 outrageous things
00:27:02.260 about his critics
00:27:03.340 and you just go,
00:27:04.820 oh, it's just part of the show.
00:27:05.700 I mean,
00:27:07.500 I think he's passed
00:27:08.540 into Don Rickles territory.
00:27:11.920 I was hearing yesterday
00:27:13.460 yet another story
00:27:15.060 about now deceased
00:27:16.620 comedian Don Rickles
00:27:18.480 whose entire show
00:27:19.980 was about insulting
00:27:21.600 people in the audience
00:27:22.700 and famous people.
00:27:24.380 He would just insult people.
00:27:25.900 Now, if you were
00:27:26.560 to just walk up somebody
00:27:27.420 and insult them,
00:27:28.980 they would be
00:27:29.480 quite mad.
00:27:30.240 But if your brand
00:27:32.280 becomes the
00:27:33.460 I'm the insult person,
00:27:35.020 you become Don Rickles,
00:27:36.780 then you can say anything.
00:27:38.500 Because people say,
00:27:39.260 oh, I get it.
00:27:39.740 It's just part of the show.
00:27:41.200 I think Trump
00:27:42.880 has sort of
00:27:45.020 drifted into
00:27:46.320 the Don Rickles
00:27:47.480 frame
00:27:48.780 where he can just
00:27:50.460 say this
00:27:52.200 about John McCain's
00:27:54.640 war injury
00:27:55.260 and people just
00:27:56.480 shrug it off.
00:27:58.220 I don't think
00:27:59.160 it's going to be
00:27:59.580 a headline.
00:28:00.240 Well, it's a headline.
00:28:01.640 I don't think anybody cares.
00:28:03.180 I think it will change
00:28:04.200 zero votes
00:28:05.420 because it's McCain.
00:28:09.260 Trump is really good
00:28:10.780 about not going after
00:28:12.080 innocent citizens
00:28:13.700 and voters
00:28:14.320 who are minding
00:28:14.980 their own business
00:28:15.720 as opposed to
00:28:17.680 Dementia Hitler
00:28:18.520 who wants you to know
00:28:20.120 that MAGA people
00:28:21.000 are definitely bad
00:28:21.980 to the core.
00:28:23.680 Trump doesn't do that.
00:28:25.760 Compare these two things.
00:28:27.960 Trump mocking
00:28:28.840 the war injuries
00:28:29.900 of one character
00:28:32.360 who many people
00:28:33.860 in the country
00:28:34.320 who agree with Trump
00:28:35.240 think is despicable
00:28:36.820 and has gotten us
00:28:38.240 into wars
00:28:39.760 we didn't need
00:28:40.380 to be in
00:28:40.780 and whatnot.
00:28:44.740 Compare that
00:28:45.820 to Biden
00:28:47.820 giving a speech
00:28:48.760 saying that
00:28:49.340 the MAGA people
00:28:50.060 are insurrectionist
00:28:51.240 supporters.
00:28:52.580 which one's worse?
00:28:55.500 I would say
00:28:56.300 Dementia Hitler
00:28:57.040 is way worse.
00:28:59.080 Now, on an individual level
00:29:00.660 Trump was worse
00:29:02.020 but it's worse
00:29:02.640 against a critic.
00:29:05.960 I don't know.
00:29:06.460 Saying bad things
00:29:07.080 about a critic
00:29:07.640 is just sort of
00:29:08.380 business as usual.
00:29:11.040 But saying bad things
00:29:12.300 about your public
00:29:13.200 if you're the president
00:29:14.180 is really,
00:29:15.660 really,
00:29:16.060 really bad.
00:29:16.760 I don't approve
00:29:18.540 of either one.
00:29:19.680 Just,
00:29:20.780 you know,
00:29:21.060 if you're saying
00:29:21.680 why are you approving
00:29:22.880 of Trump
00:29:24.300 making fun
00:29:25.480 of somebody's disability?
00:29:26.800 I'm not approving it.
00:29:28.260 I'm just saying
00:29:29.100 I understand it
00:29:29.880 as part of the show.
00:29:30.660 so it doesn't bother me
00:29:33.120 in any way whatsoever.
00:29:36.100 So here's my theme
00:29:37.320 for today.
00:29:38.820 Everything's corrupt
00:29:39.580 and it's obvious.
00:29:42.160 Everything's corrupt
00:29:42.960 and it's obvious.
00:29:44.180 So in the following stories
00:29:46.500 you can see that theme.
00:29:48.180 So I was reading
00:29:48.880 the publication
00:29:49.940 The Hill
00:29:50.520 and I noticed
00:29:52.220 that they use
00:29:53.060 insurrection
00:29:54.080 when talking about
00:29:55.440 January 6th
00:29:56.840 as though it's
00:29:57.520 a proven fact.
00:29:59.540 In other words
00:30:00.140 they don't soften it
00:30:01.380 by saying
00:30:01.920 some call it
00:30:03.180 an insurrection.
00:30:05.760 You know,
00:30:06.000 some have called
00:30:06.680 some have branded it.
00:30:08.200 What they don't say
00:30:09.080 is that no court
00:30:10.020 has found it
00:30:10.780 was an insurrection
00:30:11.660 which is true
00:30:13.060 no court has
00:30:13.800 but they don't say that.
00:30:15.200 They just read
00:30:16.180 an article
00:30:16.580 and they say
00:30:17.400 the insurrection
00:30:19.600 brought an overwhelming
00:30:20.740 bipartisan disapproval
00:30:22.300 from Americans.
00:30:23.620 Just the insurrection.
00:30:26.040 Not the protest
00:30:27.360 that some people
00:30:28.780 said was an insurrection.
00:30:31.140 But the insurrection.
00:30:33.460 Now I ask you
00:30:34.260 is this a sign
00:30:35.200 that the press
00:30:36.200 is clearly corrupt?
00:30:39.240 I think so.
00:30:40.840 For the press
00:30:41.860 to write insurrection
00:30:43.020 when clearly
00:30:43.900 the evidence
00:30:44.540 is 100% against it
00:30:46.920 and then just
00:30:48.580 to treat it
00:30:49.100 like it's such a fact
00:30:50.220 that you don't even
00:30:51.520 need to explain it
00:30:52.560 or put any caveats
00:30:53.920 you don't need
00:30:54.420 to put it in quotes
00:30:55.340 it's just a fact.
00:30:56.820 Now how is that
00:30:59.240 different
00:30:59.720 from Trump
00:31:01.780 saying that
00:31:02.320 the 2020 election
00:31:03.440 was rigged?
00:31:04.980 What did people say
00:31:06.440 when Trump says
00:31:07.380 2020 was rigged?
00:31:10.140 Everybody
00:31:10.700 everybody said
00:31:11.920 no court
00:31:12.800 showed it was rigged.
00:31:15.140 No court
00:31:16.180 showed it was rigged.
00:31:17.480 Guess what?
00:31:18.140 No court
00:31:18.940 has shown
00:31:20.300 it was an insurrection.
00:31:21.280 Well at least
00:31:23.480 he's not been
00:31:24.220 accused of insurrection.
00:31:26.220 There was a court
00:31:27.080 that just sort of
00:31:28.040 said there was
00:31:28.800 an insurrection
00:31:29.300 but there hasn't
00:31:30.540 been a trial
00:31:31.180 on the question
00:31:31.960 of whether
00:31:32.340 it was an insurrection.
00:31:33.740 So why is it
00:31:34.440 that a trial
00:31:36.420 is necessary
00:31:37.180 when you're saying
00:31:37.960 the election
00:31:38.820 was rigged?
00:31:40.860 You can't say
00:31:41.580 that unless
00:31:42.020 it was a trial
00:31:42.600 but you can say
00:31:43.700 it was an insurrection
00:31:44.780 when there's no
00:31:46.300 court finding
00:31:46.980 of anything
00:31:48.140 of the sort.
00:31:49.800 That's corruption.
00:31:50.680 So this is a
00:31:52.120 corrupt publication
00:31:53.240 in my opinion.
00:31:56.240 How bad
00:31:57.040 was the insurrection?
00:31:58.460 Well on the same
00:31:59.300 day yesterday
00:32:00.060 that an MSNBC
00:32:02.020 host cried
00:32:03.480 on the air
00:32:04.260 when hearing
00:32:05.300 how horrible
00:32:05.960 January 6th was.
00:32:07.620 That's right.
00:32:08.300 He had to take
00:32:08.860 out the tissue
00:32:09.480 because he was
00:32:10.620 crying on the air
00:32:11.860 about all the
00:32:12.960 violence and
00:32:13.620 terribleness
00:32:14.100 of the day.
00:32:15.720 At the same time
00:32:16.760 I'm reading
00:32:18.420 a post
00:32:19.600 from
00:32:20.260 the blue
00:32:21.660 collar
00:32:21.960 intellectual
00:32:22.520 podcast
00:32:23.260 Julian
00:32:24.040 is his
00:32:24.600 name
00:32:24.820 and
00:32:26.140 he
00:32:27.240 posted
00:32:27.880 this
00:32:28.360 happy
00:32:29.360 J6
00:32:30.140 to everyone
00:32:30.700 losing
00:32:31.100 their minds
00:32:31.720 I've had
00:32:32.860 sex more
00:32:33.500 violent
00:32:33.920 than this
00:32:34.400 insurrection
00:32:34.940 insurrection.
00:32:35.940 Y'all are
00:32:37.280 ridiculous for
00:32:38.140 trying to
00:32:38.540 take Trump
00:32:39.000 off the
00:32:39.360 ballot
00:32:39.580 for this.
00:32:42.720 I've had
00:32:43.500 sex more
00:32:44.100 violent
00:32:44.500 than this
00:32:45.000 insurrection.
00:32:48.480 Now that's
00:32:49.240 one of the
00:32:49.620 funniest things
00:32:50.300 I've heard
00:32:50.720 about.
00:32:51.960 I've had
00:32:52.700 sex more
00:32:53.280 violent
00:32:53.620 than this
00:32:54.120 insurrection.
00:32:55.680 Now that's
00:32:56.300 some good
00:32:56.680 mocking.
00:32:58.180 Now I've
00:32:58.480 told you
00:32:58.840 you need to
00:33:00.120 mock this.
00:33:03.040 The January
00:33:03.460 6th thing
00:33:04.100 should be
00:33:05.280 not denied
00:33:06.240 just mocked
00:33:08.140 because it's
00:33:08.520 so fucking
00:33:08.940 stupid.
00:33:09.900 This is some
00:33:10.420 good mockery.
00:33:11.280 I've had
00:33:11.500 sex more
00:33:12.780 violent.
00:33:15.080 Well the
00:33:15.840 Hill who
00:33:16.720 we've already
00:33:17.180 determined is a
00:33:17.980 piece of shit
00:33:18.560 is also
00:33:19.920 reporting that
00:33:20.640 the
00:33:20.940 triple
00:33:22.020 demic is
00:33:22.760 surging
00:33:23.160 and there
00:33:24.300 are fears
00:33:24.700 of it.
00:33:25.060 Are you
00:33:27.420 all worried
00:33:27.820 about the
00:33:28.160 triple demic?
00:33:30.100 Is there
00:33:30.740 even one
00:33:31.280 person here
00:33:31.980 who's all
00:33:33.160 worried about
00:33:33.680 the triple
00:33:34.140 demic?
00:33:35.160 You know
00:33:35.520 the flu
00:33:36.260 and the
00:33:36.860 COVID and
00:33:37.540 I don't
00:33:37.980 know what
00:33:38.240 the third
00:33:38.600 thing is.
00:33:39.740 You're all
00:33:40.100 worried right?
00:33:41.320 Oh we're
00:33:42.100 so worried.
00:33:43.400 I'm so
00:33:43.960 worried I
00:33:44.760 I changed
00:33:47.880 all of my
00:33:48.520 all of my
00:33:50.000 life over
00:33:50.540 it.
00:33:51.320 Nope.
00:33:52.180 Didn't do
00:33:52.580 anything
00:33:52.840 differently.
00:33:53.960 I didn't do
00:33:54.380 anything
00:33:54.640 differently.
00:33:55.400 Did you?
00:33:56.420 I can't
00:33:57.100 think of
00:33:57.380 anything I
00:33:57.940 did differently
00:33:58.460 because there
00:33:59.060 was a
00:33:59.340 triple demic.
00:34:00.860 Oh but
00:34:01.320 they got a
00:34:01.720 word for
00:34:02.140 it.
00:34:02.700 It's a
00:34:03.040 triple demic.
00:34:04.260 Now do
00:34:04.580 you think
00:34:04.920 that the
00:34:05.320 Hill wrote
00:34:05.820 this article
00:34:06.480 because this
00:34:07.600 is newsworthy
00:34:08.680 and interesting
00:34:09.380 or because
00:34:10.580 it has a
00:34:11.200 political
00:34:11.640 dimension to
00:34:12.420 it?
00:34:13.780 Well I
00:34:15.260 don't know.
00:34:16.500 Makes you
00:34:16.860 wonder.
00:34:17.840 If they
00:34:18.160 hadn't called
00:34:18.680 it an
00:34:18.980 insurrection I
00:34:19.880 might have
00:34:20.280 given them
00:34:20.780 the benefit
00:34:21.200 of a doubt.
00:34:22.660 But when
00:34:23.360 you do
00:34:23.660 something that's
00:34:24.340 clearly biased
00:34:25.500 and political
00:34:26.100 then I
00:34:27.540 say maybe
00:34:28.300 I can
00:34:28.620 extend that
00:34:29.160 to your
00:34:29.440 other coverage.
00:34:30.900 Wouldn't
00:34:31.160 that be
00:34:31.460 fair?
00:34:33.680 Well let's
00:34:34.360 talk about
00:34:34.840 President Biden
00:34:35.740 and his
00:34:36.420 dementia
00:34:38.620 Hitler
00:34:39.100 tentpole
00:34:39.820 hoax.
00:34:40.280 he said
00:34:43.040 that three
00:34:43.400 years ago
00:34:43.960 a violent
00:34:44.500 mob
00:34:44.960 fueled by
00:34:45.680 lies
00:34:46.220 attacked
00:34:46.660 the U.S.
00:34:47.240 capital.
00:34:48.320 Our
00:34:48.440 democracy
00:34:49.040 was tested
00:34:49.880 but it
00:34:50.700 held because
00:34:51.340 we the
00:34:51.740 people
00:34:52.040 prevailed.
00:34:54.060 Now what
00:34:54.440 I see
00:34:54.920 is a
00:34:55.820 Hitler
00:34:56.460 like
00:34:56.960 anti-
00:34:57.460 democratic
00:34:58.040 guy
00:34:58.460 who's
00:34:59.200 keeping
00:34:59.520 his
00:35:00.100 trying to
00:35:01.120 keep his
00:35:01.900 opponent
00:35:02.240 off the
00:35:02.740 ballot
00:35:03.060 trying to
00:35:04.080 or his
00:35:04.540 party is
00:35:05.100 doing
00:35:06.720 massive
00:35:07.280 work to
00:35:08.020 decrease
00:35:08.540 free speech
00:35:09.380 and to
00:35:11.180 jail their
00:35:11.780 opponents.
00:35:13.600 Dementia
00:35:14.060 Hitler
00:35:14.320 and he
00:35:15.900 has the
00:35:16.300 nerve
00:35:16.760 to not
00:35:18.360 only promote
00:35:19.220 this hoax
00:35:19.800 for his
00:35:20.160 presidency
00:35:20.600 but he
00:35:22.120 says
00:35:22.480 the
00:35:23.640 republic
00:35:24.380 held
00:35:24.740 because
00:35:25.120 we the
00:35:25.520 people
00:35:25.840 prevailed.
00:35:28.100 I'm
00:35:28.780 pretty sure
00:35:29.220 that we
00:35:29.580 the people
00:35:30.060 were the
00:35:30.440 protesters.
00:35:32.320 Well let's
00:35:33.240 get that
00:35:33.640 straight.
00:35:34.560 We the
00:35:35.140 people
00:35:35.500 was the
00:35:37.600 protesters.
00:35:39.380 we not
00:35:40.020 the
00:35:40.200 people
00:35:40.540 was the
00:35:41.280 government
00:35:41.640 they were
00:35:42.040 protesting
00:35:42.560 because
00:35:44.700 they're not
00:35:45.160 the people.
00:35:46.520 I mean
00:35:46.920 that's
00:35:47.140 basically
00:35:47.560 the
00:35:47.940 protest
00:35:48.500 is that
00:35:49.060 the
00:35:49.240 government
00:35:49.580 was not
00:35:50.220 being
00:35:51.360 responsive
00:35:51.860 to the
00:35:52.200 people.
00:35:52.980 So no
00:35:53.260 we the
00:35:53.700 people
00:35:54.000 is who
00:35:54.460 the
00:35:55.100 protesters
00:35:55.580 were.
00:35:56.540 Let's
00:35:56.780 get that
00:35:57.120 part
00:35:57.280 straight.
00:35:58.200 So yes
00:35:58.660 we do
00:35:59.480 have a
00:36:00.040 dementia
00:36:00.620 president
00:36:01.140 and his
00:36:02.520 tentpole
00:36:03.180 hoax
00:36:03.660 is going
00:36:04.480 to be
00:36:04.640 January
00:36:05.020 6th.
00:36:05.720 So
00:36:05.840 they're
00:36:06.620 now
00:36:06.900 firmly
00:36:07.320 in the
00:36:07.740 narrow
00:36:08.020 ravine.
00:36:08.620 and let
00:36:10.360 your
00:36:10.520 mockery
00:36:11.020 cannons
00:36:11.460 go.
00:36:14.860 Jonathan
00:36:15.460 Turley
00:36:15.860 points out
00:36:16.460 that over
00:36:17.240 half of
00:36:17.720 the states
00:36:18.120 are calling
00:36:18.580 on the
00:36:18.920 courts
00:36:19.260 to reject
00:36:20.540 Trump's
00:36:21.340 disqualification
00:36:22.500 to be on
00:36:23.300 the ballot.
00:36:24.940 So more
00:36:26.000 than half
00:36:26.380 of the states
00:36:26.880 are saying
00:36:27.300 it should
00:36:28.780 be illegal
00:36:29.680 or at least
00:36:30.300 unwise
00:36:31.080 to keep
00:36:31.920 them off
00:36:32.240 the ballot.
00:36:34.000 Which means
00:36:34.940 that over
00:36:35.780 half of
00:36:36.180 Americans
00:36:36.580 oppose this
00:36:37.400 effort
00:36:37.780 to keep
00:36:39.460 them
00:36:39.600 off.
00:36:40.760 But
00:36:40.960 does
00:36:41.440 dementia
00:36:41.980 Hitler
00:36:43.120 care?
00:36:44.320 No,
00:36:44.520 dementia
00:36:44.860 Hitler
00:36:45.180 is going
00:36:46.360 to do
00:36:46.840 something
00:36:47.200 that more
00:36:47.600 than half
00:36:48.080 of the
00:36:48.320 public
00:36:48.580 doesn't
00:36:48.920 want.
00:36:52.140 We had
00:36:53.100 the
00:36:53.300 34-minute
00:36:54.400 glitch
00:36:54.760 again.
00:36:55.800 Still
00:36:56.120 don't know
00:36:56.440 what that
00:36:56.720 is.
00:36:57.900 So yeah,
00:36:59.000 that's a
00:36:59.840 pretty big
00:37:00.220 sign of
00:37:00.640 corruption,
00:37:01.320 trying to
00:37:01.640 keep your
00:37:01.980 opponent
00:37:02.280 off.
00:37:03.360 How about
00:37:03.680 that pipe
00:37:04.240 bomber story?
00:37:05.300 Remember
00:37:05.600 that?
00:37:06.280 January 6th
00:37:07.080 pipe bomber?
00:37:08.180 It's a
00:37:08.520 good thing
00:37:08.860 we now
00:37:09.260 have all
00:37:09.760 the
00:37:09.900 information
00:37:10.360 about that,
00:37:10.980 isn't it?
00:37:11.820 To which
00:37:12.240 you're saying,
00:37:13.140 what?
00:37:14.440 I don't
00:37:15.060 know about
00:37:15.460 that story
00:37:16.000 or I
00:37:16.400 forget about
00:37:16.900 it.
00:37:17.600 Well,
00:37:18.100 Vivek Ramaswamy
00:37:19.120 reminds us
00:37:20.000 in Truth
00:37:20.920 Number 9,
00:37:21.700 part of his
00:37:22.180 series,
00:37:22.680 he says,
00:37:23.860 pipe bombs
00:37:24.520 were placed
00:37:25.080 near the
00:37:25.460 DNC and
00:37:26.060 RNC
00:37:26.480 headquarters
00:37:26.920 on January
00:37:27.580 5th
00:37:28.860 in 2021
00:37:29.600 with many
00:37:32.020 irregularities,
00:37:32.940 including Kamala Harris
00:37:33.940 showing up at the
00:37:34.700 DNC headquarters
00:37:35.520 on the morning
00:37:36.080 of January 6th
00:37:37.400 without Secret
00:37:38.240 Service or any
00:37:39.120 law enforcement
00:37:39.740 spotting the
00:37:40.520 pipe bombs.
00:37:42.200 So that's a big
00:37:43.280 question.
00:37:43.720 Why wouldn't they
00:37:44.180 spot them?
00:37:44.780 Because apparently
00:37:45.360 they weren't well
00:37:46.160 hidden.
00:37:47.020 They were not
00:37:47.380 well hidden.
00:37:48.340 Only for both
00:37:49.000 pipe bombs to be
00:37:49.840 found later on
00:37:50.500 January 6th.
00:37:52.080 Yeah, strangely,
00:37:52.940 the government
00:37:53.300 still hasn't said
00:37:54.120 a peep about
00:37:55.180 the perp.
00:37:56.320 Despite
00:37:56.720 available
00:37:57.320 surveillance footage
00:37:58.500 of the pipe
00:37:59.140 bomber, which has
00:38:00.620 not been fully
00:38:01.420 released,
00:38:02.600 why not?
00:38:03.780 a CBS reporter
00:38:05.480 recently exposed
00:38:06.220 the DOJ's
00:38:07.120 notable silence
00:38:08.280 on this
00:38:08.600 investigation.
00:38:10.140 What really
00:38:10.640 happened?
00:38:11.220 Yes.
00:38:12.640 Does this
00:38:13.100 sound like,
00:38:14.800 oh, just
00:38:15.480 some little
00:38:15.940 mystery criminal
00:38:16.880 thing?
00:38:17.720 Or does it
00:38:18.540 sound like the
00:38:19.060 government is
00:38:19.640 covering up
00:38:20.260 something that
00:38:20.840 looks like an
00:38:22.240 op?
00:38:23.600 It looks corrupt.
00:38:25.500 It looks like the
00:38:26.240 government's covering
00:38:26.980 something up.
00:38:28.060 I don't know for
00:38:28.800 sure, but in the
00:38:30.080 context of all the
00:38:31.020 other fuckery, it's
00:38:33.060 reasonable to assume
00:38:34.200 what Vivek is
00:38:35.440 assuming, that
00:38:37.120 there's something
00:38:37.760 here, there's the
00:38:39.420 lack of transparency.
00:38:41.260 A lack of
00:38:41.840 transparency from a
00:38:43.080 government entity
00:38:43.940 allows you to
00:38:45.220 assume guilt, which
00:38:47.620 you should not
00:38:48.140 assume for a
00:38:48.760 human, like an
00:38:49.760 individual citizen.
00:38:51.060 Assume innocence
00:38:51.620 for people, assume
00:38:53.200 guilt for your
00:38:54.400 non-transparent
00:38:55.300 government.
00:38:55.960 Mike Cernovich
00:38:59.100 posted this
00:39:00.000 asking, is
00:39:01.000 America the only
00:39:01.740 country where you
00:39:02.480 don't know election
00:39:03.240 results for weeks
00:39:04.180 and are assured
00:39:05.240 this is normal and
00:39:06.160 not corrupt at
00:39:06.880 all?
00:39:09.420 What if it's as
00:39:10.680 obvious as it
00:39:11.460 looks?
00:39:12.460 Why are we the
00:39:13.080 only country that
00:39:13.860 can't counter
00:39:14.360 votes the same
00:39:15.140 day?
00:39:16.340 I can only think
00:39:17.340 of one reason,
00:39:19.260 and it's not
00:39:19.840 incompetence.
00:39:21.080 Because
00:39:21.560 incompetence has
00:39:22.940 largely been driven
00:39:23.960 out of the system
00:39:24.760 by doing the
00:39:25.920 same election
00:39:26.600 year after year
00:39:27.380 after year with
00:39:28.260 people who know
00:39:29.020 what they're doing.
00:39:29.940 So I don't think
00:39:30.720 it's incompetence.
00:39:32.860 It has to be
00:39:33.800 planned.
00:39:35.600 It has to be
00:39:36.560 designed that way.
00:39:37.980 Otherwise, you
00:39:38.560 don't get it.
00:39:39.640 Because you can
00:39:40.180 design it out
00:39:41.100 easily.
00:39:41.880 Other countries
00:39:42.440 do it easily.
00:39:43.520 It's not even a
00:39:44.220 challenge, really.
00:39:46.160 There's no
00:39:46.760 challenge to it.
00:39:47.540 We just don't
00:39:48.800 do it.
00:39:50.260 And everybody
00:39:51.120 in the country,
00:39:52.540 Democrat,
00:39:53.320 Independent,
00:39:54.080 Republican,
00:39:54.480 everybody knows
00:39:55.640 that your
00:39:56.800 credibility of
00:39:57.840 your system
00:39:58.500 degrades with
00:40:00.040 every hour you
00:40:00.820 delay the
00:40:01.480 final count.
00:40:02.740 Everybody knows
00:40:03.360 that.
00:40:03.780 It's just obvious.
00:40:04.620 Common sense.
00:40:06.140 So if it's
00:40:06.860 obvious it's a
00:40:07.660 terrible, terrible,
00:40:08.380 terrible thing for
00:40:09.400 the Republic,
00:40:10.440 why don't we
00:40:11.000 fix it?
00:40:12.720 There's only
00:40:13.580 one reason.
00:40:14.740 Corruption.
00:40:16.840 I can't think
00:40:17.740 of a second
00:40:18.160 reason.
00:40:19.260 Like, even if
00:40:19.860 you assume that
00:40:20.500 the country has
00:40:21.100 become terribly
00:40:21.880 incompetent,
00:40:22.820 incompetent, they
00:40:23.820 would at least
00:40:24.420 be trying.
00:40:26.600 Am I right?
00:40:28.140 Even if you
00:40:28.800 assume incompetence
00:40:29.840 is the problem,
00:40:31.220 they would at
00:40:31.760 least be
00:40:32.260 conspicuously
00:40:33.100 trying to fix
00:40:34.380 it.
00:40:35.120 But that's not
00:40:35.880 happening, is
00:40:37.220 it?
00:40:38.700 I don't know.
00:40:39.100 Maybe in some
00:40:39.640 states they may
00:40:40.520 have tweaked
00:40:41.100 some things.
00:40:42.220 But if it
00:40:43.360 happens again,
00:40:45.080 if this election
00:40:46.860 is another one
00:40:47.640 where we don't
00:40:48.160 know the results
00:40:48.740 for days, you
00:40:49.600 have to assume
00:40:50.300 it's rigged.
00:40:51.480 You just have
00:40:52.100 to.
00:40:53.380 Why else?
00:40:57.620 California has
00:40:59.180 declared that the
00:41:01.200 state health
00:41:01.800 insurance will
00:41:02.400 cover sex
00:41:03.180 change operations
00:41:04.160 for illegal
00:41:04.940 immigrants.
00:41:06.380 So not only
00:41:07.360 can you come to
00:41:08.100 America and get
00:41:09.440 health care, but
00:41:10.520 they will change
00:41:11.080 your gender if
00:41:11.760 you ask.
00:41:12.600 Now, I just
00:41:15.180 think that that's
00:41:17.100 so close to a
00:41:19.640 perfect law.
00:41:20.480 But you
00:41:21.840 know, some
00:41:22.220 things, you
00:41:23.060 know, close
00:41:24.240 only counts
00:41:24.840 in horseshoes
00:41:25.620 and hand
00:41:25.940 granines.
00:41:26.460 You know, they
00:41:26.720 say being
00:41:27.620 close is still
00:41:28.560 a fail.
00:41:29.500 And when I
00:41:29.900 say it's close
00:41:30.720 to being a
00:41:31.240 perfect policy,
00:41:32.980 instead of
00:41:33.640 covering sex
00:41:34.780 change for illegal
00:41:35.660 immigrants, I
00:41:36.860 would make just
00:41:37.740 the smallest
00:41:38.300 tweak to this.
00:41:39.900 Just the smallest
00:41:40.680 tweak.
00:41:41.080 I keep it just
00:41:41.680 the way it is
00:41:42.260 with the smallest
00:41:43.740 little adjustment.
00:41:45.220 I'd make it
00:41:46.000 mandatory.
00:41:46.520 Okay.
00:41:50.480 Yeah.
00:41:52.280 That's how I'd
00:41:53.120 play it.
00:41:54.360 You'd end
00:41:54.760 immigration in
00:41:55.720 about 10
00:41:56.620 minutes.
00:41:57.560 You may come
00:41:58.480 into the
00:41:58.820 country under
00:41:59.420 asylum.
00:42:00.460 We'll be
00:42:01.200 altering your
00:42:01.820 gender.
00:42:03.980 And it's
00:42:04.700 mandatory.
00:42:06.140 Just make it
00:42:07.000 mandatory.
00:42:07.560 We can solve
00:42:08.080 this whole thing.
00:42:10.160 And, you know,
00:42:10.700 the best part is
00:42:11.360 you wouldn't
00:42:12.160 really have to
00:42:13.040 surgically alter
00:42:14.320 all of them.
00:42:16.020 You could do
00:42:16.880 three or four
00:42:17.600 and you would
00:42:18.020 end the entire
00:42:18.640 immigration problem.
00:42:20.480 Am I right?
00:42:22.500 Because I think
00:42:23.240 people notice a
00:42:24.040 pattern.
00:42:24.800 It's like,
00:42:25.240 wait, how many?
00:42:26.320 Three.
00:42:27.020 We're just
00:42:27.540 getting started.
00:42:29.720 Okay, I'm
00:42:30.340 out.
00:42:32.460 Three would be
00:42:33.240 enough.
00:42:34.140 Three would be
00:42:34.620 enough.
00:42:35.080 No, I'm just
00:42:35.840 kidding.
00:42:37.080 I'm joking.
00:42:38.280 Don't get too
00:42:38.860 serious.
00:42:41.780 Speaking of
00:42:42.420 Cernovecci,
00:42:42.960 also had a good
00:42:43.660 point about
00:42:44.280 how the
00:42:45.680 Congress members
00:42:47.740 are underpaid
00:42:49.420 relative to
00:42:51.320 what we're
00:42:51.940 asking them
00:42:52.440 to do.
00:42:53.440 So $174,000
00:42:54.700 a year
00:42:55.320 to live
00:42:56.880 away from
00:42:57.360 your family
00:42:57.940 and have
00:42:59.240 like separate
00:43:00.080 quarters.
00:43:01.320 So you're
00:43:01.700 supporting your
00:43:02.260 family back
00:43:02.960 where your
00:43:03.280 family is,
00:43:04.520 but you also
00:43:04.980 have to support
00:43:05.660 yourself in
00:43:06.340 a, at least
00:43:07.660 a lifestyle
00:43:08.200 that makes
00:43:08.820 it seem
00:43:09.460 credible that
00:43:10.160 you're an
00:43:10.580 elected official
00:43:11.360 in D.C.,
00:43:12.660 which is
00:43:13.080 really expensive
00:43:13.920 and $174,000
00:43:16.080 a year sounds
00:43:16.820 like a lot
00:43:17.420 to a lot
00:43:17.980 of people,
00:43:18.900 but it's
00:43:19.200 not really
00:43:19.760 a lot
00:43:20.160 in that
00:43:21.100 context
00:43:21.720 because you'd
00:43:22.760 have two
00:43:23.240 homes.
00:43:24.660 Now,
00:43:25.540 Joshua Lysak
00:43:26.740 added to
00:43:27.400 that,
00:43:28.880 famous ghost
00:43:30.200 writer,
00:43:31.140 Joshua Lysak,
00:43:32.600 and I'll
00:43:33.820 read what he
00:43:34.200 said.
00:43:34.420 He said,
00:43:34.700 Congressional
00:43:35.180 salaries need
00:43:35.900 to be in
00:43:36.420 the millions
00:43:36.820 of dollars
00:43:37.460 or zero.
00:43:40.220 It needs
00:43:40.920 to be millions
00:43:41.660 of dollars
00:43:42.140 to pay
00:43:42.540 or zero.
00:43:44.700 And here's
00:43:45.100 the argument.
00:43:46.340 A lukewarm
00:43:47.100 $174,000
00:43:48.260 per year
00:43:48.620 means you
00:43:49.040 need to
00:43:49.320 earn your
00:43:49.660 fortune
00:43:50.000 through other
00:43:50.700 means in
00:43:51.240 D.C.
00:43:52.940 And you
00:43:53.540 need leadership
00:43:54.200 where we're
00:43:54.480 financially
00:43:54.880 independent
00:43:55.340 and free.
00:43:56.320 Now,
00:43:56.640 does that
00:43:56.920 strike a
00:43:58.300 chord?
00:43:59.380 It really
00:44:00.140 does,
00:44:00.620 doesn't it?
00:44:02.020 Because if
00:44:02.740 you tell me
00:44:03.460 that you put
00:44:04.780 all these
00:44:05.240 people who
00:44:06.180 have, let's
00:44:07.080 say they're
00:44:07.420 aggressive
00:44:07.840 enough that
00:44:09.120 they can run
00:44:09.620 for office
00:44:10.160 and win.
00:44:11.340 So you're
00:44:11.900 a certain
00:44:12.220 type of
00:44:12.800 alpha
00:44:13.280 aggressive
00:44:14.420 character.
00:44:15.100 And then
00:44:15.940 we guarantee
00:44:16.560 that you
00:44:16.980 can't make
00:44:17.520 enough money
00:44:18.000 to live
00:44:19.080 in comfort.
00:44:20.720 What are
00:44:21.380 you going
00:44:21.600 to do?
00:44:23.680 It's almost
00:44:24.440 like we're
00:44:24.860 begging them
00:44:25.420 to steal
00:44:25.880 from us.
00:44:27.060 You're
00:44:27.620 begging them
00:44:28.240 to steal
00:44:28.720 from the
00:44:29.140 public.
00:44:30.080 Because if
00:44:31.080 they don't,
00:44:32.500 they're doing
00:44:33.020 more work
00:44:33.640 than they're
00:44:33.980 getting paid
00:44:34.480 for.
00:44:36.460 That's what
00:44:37.160 makes people
00:44:37.720 steal.
00:44:38.960 They think
00:44:39.780 that their
00:44:40.780 situation is
00:44:41.480 not fair.
00:44:42.640 So I can
00:44:43.560 imagine you
00:44:44.100 could justify
00:44:44.820 it very
00:44:45.340 easily as
00:44:46.320 in, well,
00:44:48.500 you know,
00:44:48.900 I really
00:44:49.340 couldn't stay
00:44:49.920 in this
00:44:50.240 job and
00:44:50.920 I'm helping
00:44:51.400 people so
00:44:52.140 much in
00:44:52.740 my district
00:44:53.360 and I
00:44:54.260 really am
00:44:54.680 one of the
00:44:55.060 good guys.
00:44:56.440 So if I
00:44:57.720 allow this
00:44:58.360 project to
00:44:59.260 go forward
00:45:00.040 and I vote
00:45:00.600 for it,
00:45:01.900 it's a good
00:45:04.140 project anyway.
00:45:05.540 Hey, yeah,
00:45:06.400 maybe I was
00:45:07.000 bribed to
00:45:07.800 support it,
00:45:08.840 but you know
00:45:09.280 what?
00:45:09.500 I would have
00:45:10.000 supported it
00:45:10.600 anyway.
00:45:11.000 So you
00:45:12.060 can see
00:45:12.400 how easily
00:45:13.020 somebody can
00:45:14.260 talk themselves
00:45:14.920 into taking
00:45:15.560 a bribe
00:45:16.100 without calling
00:45:17.720 it a bribe.
00:45:18.860 So we put
00:45:19.900 these people
00:45:20.380 in this
00:45:20.640 situation,
00:45:21.840 which as
00:45:22.840 Joshua Lysak
00:45:24.800 points out,
00:45:26.380 we've designed
00:45:27.460 a system
00:45:28.160 for corruption,
00:45:29.880 not to
00:45:30.580 prevent it.
00:45:32.380 Remember,
00:45:33.160 design is
00:45:33.840 destiny.
00:45:34.440 You can look
00:45:34.880 at the design
00:45:35.600 of a thing
00:45:36.020 and determine
00:45:37.040 how it'll
00:45:37.580 go.
00:45:38.700 So if I
00:45:39.120 said to
00:45:39.500 you,
00:45:39.900 the government
00:45:40.320 doesn't exist,
00:45:41.140 I'm going to
00:45:41.480 design one
00:45:42.040 on paper,
00:45:42.980 and I'm
00:45:43.720 going to
00:45:43.860 have these
00:45:44.220 congresspeople
00:45:44.920 get elected,
00:45:45.640 they have
00:45:45.900 to live in
00:45:46.320 D.C.
00:45:46.720 away from
00:45:47.080 their families,
00:45:48.280 twice the
00:45:48.800 expense,
00:45:49.860 and we're
00:45:50.360 going to
00:45:50.540 pay them
00:45:51.020 just enough
00:45:51.700 to get
00:45:51.980 by.
00:45:53.060 Just enough.
00:45:55.020 What would
00:45:55.740 you say is
00:45:56.580 the likely
00:45:57.060 outcome of
00:45:57.680 that system?
00:45:58.960 By design.
00:46:00.540 That would
00:46:01.100 be a system
00:46:01.640 designed to
00:46:03.080 guarantee
00:46:03.680 corruption.
00:46:05.240 And it
00:46:05.600 looks like
00:46:05.940 that's what
00:46:06.280 we got.
00:46:07.840 Do you
00:46:08.300 know how
00:46:08.640 I know?
00:46:09.760 Because it's
00:46:10.500 designed to
00:46:12.200 guarantee
00:46:12.640 corruption.
00:46:15.120 Do you
00:46:15.360 know why I
00:46:16.280 think the
00:46:16.620 election is
00:46:17.460 almost certainly
00:46:18.280 rigged?
00:46:19.560 Or there's an
00:46:20.720 attempt to
00:46:21.220 rig it,
00:46:21.540 whether they
00:46:21.920 do it or
00:46:22.320 not?
00:46:23.220 It's because
00:46:23.820 their elections
00:46:24.440 are designed
00:46:25.460 to make it
00:46:26.760 hard to audit
00:46:27.400 them.
00:46:28.540 By design,
00:46:30.040 it's not an
00:46:30.780 accident.
00:46:32.120 You could
00:46:32.700 very easily
00:46:33.340 make a fully
00:46:34.040 auditable
00:46:34.520 system.
00:46:35.420 Just put it
00:46:35.960 all on paper
00:46:36.560 and have people
00:46:37.160 count it
00:46:37.540 twice.
00:46:38.620 Am I
00:46:39.160 wrong?
00:46:40.180 Put it
00:46:40.660 all on
00:46:40.960 paper and
00:46:42.460 then an
00:46:42.800 audit is
00:46:43.500 you count
00:46:43.880 it twice.
00:46:45.680 That's
00:46:45.960 about it.
00:46:47.600 So it's
00:46:48.140 easy to
00:46:48.600 design a
00:46:49.080 system that
00:46:49.640 has no
00:46:50.060 corruption or
00:46:51.280 it would be
00:46:51.700 hard to have
00:46:52.140 it, but we
00:46:53.200 didn't do
00:46:53.540 it.
00:46:54.080 What is
00:46:54.520 the logical
00:46:55.140 assumption?
00:46:56.600 It's
00:46:57.080 designed to
00:46:57.620 be corrupt
00:46:58.160 and moreover
00:46:59.300 you have to
00:47:00.020 assume that
00:47:00.460 both Democrats
00:47:01.160 and Republicans
00:47:01.820 are okay
00:47:02.340 with it.
00:47:03.080 Because I
00:47:03.640 don't see a
00:47:04.200 lot of
00:47:04.400 work going
00:47:05.320 on to
00:47:05.640 fix it.
00:47:06.020 You have
00:47:07.060 to assume
00:47:07.560 both sides
00:47:08.220 are in
00:47:08.500 on it.
00:47:09.880 Not every
00:47:10.660 person, but
00:47:12.300 certainly
00:47:12.640 powerful people
00:47:13.500 on both
00:47:13.900 sides.
00:47:16.360 Well,
00:47:17.000 Representative
00:47:17.560 Clay Higgins,
00:47:18.480 who now we
00:47:19.060 know is
00:47:19.340 underpaid,
00:47:20.640 was on
00:47:21.260 Tucker's
00:47:21.700 show.
00:47:22.980 And he
00:47:24.560 says he's
00:47:25.040 got more
00:47:25.400 information than
00:47:26.080 we do about
00:47:26.920 what happened
00:47:27.320 on January
00:47:27.800 6th.
00:47:28.880 And of
00:47:29.300 course, we
00:47:29.640 were reminded
00:47:30.280 in that
00:47:31.280 episode that
00:47:31.980 Christopher
00:47:32.480 Ray, the
00:47:32.940 head of the
00:47:33.240 FBI, would
00:47:34.360 not answer
00:47:35.020 the question
00:47:35.660 of how
00:47:36.800 many FBI
00:47:37.540 undercover
00:47:38.140 agents were
00:47:39.240 dressed like
00:47:39.880 Trump supporters
00:47:40.660 and attended
00:47:41.840 January 6th.
00:47:43.460 Now, what
00:47:44.100 do you assume
00:47:44.700 when the
00:47:45.020 head of the
00:47:45.360 FBI won't
00:47:46.200 answer the
00:47:46.740 question of
00:47:47.960 whether there
00:47:48.600 were any
00:47:49.120 and how
00:47:49.880 many?
00:47:51.160 You have
00:47:51.920 to assume
00:47:52.440 that the
00:47:54.440 answer to
00:47:54.860 that question
00:47:55.440 would be
00:47:55.960 embarrassing
00:47:56.440 to the
00:47:56.860 FBI.
00:47:59.300 What would
00:48:00.060 be an
00:48:00.400 embarrassing
00:48:00.800 number?
00:48:01.600 That they
00:48:02.280 didn't have
00:48:02.700 enough?
00:48:03.860 Well, it
00:48:04.180 could.
00:48:04.940 Maybe.
00:48:05.640 It is
00:48:06.160 possible he's
00:48:06.760 worried they
00:48:07.160 didn't have
00:48:07.480 enough undercover
00:48:08.160 agents.
00:48:09.420 But the
00:48:09.840 other possibility
00:48:10.520 seems far
00:48:11.300 more likely
00:48:11.760 is that they
00:48:13.260 had a lot
00:48:13.780 or what we
00:48:15.660 would think
00:48:16.120 would be a
00:48:16.540 lot, whatever
00:48:17.160 number that
00:48:18.120 is to you.
00:48:19.240 And so it's
00:48:19.620 easier for him
00:48:20.400 or safer
00:48:21.140 not to mention
00:48:21.820 it.
00:48:22.680 Now, to
00:48:23.120 me, when
00:48:25.240 you add
00:48:25.660 that to
00:48:26.260 what Higgins
00:48:27.560 says is a
00:48:28.460 lot of
00:48:28.960 evidence that
00:48:30.920 entrapment
00:48:32.100 was the
00:48:32.920 entire
00:48:35.400 process,
00:48:37.020 there's
00:48:37.520 an audio
00:48:38.120 of Nancy
00:48:38.760 Pelosi
00:48:39.220 being happy
00:48:41.560 during January
00:48:42.380 6th as it
00:48:43.160 was happening
00:48:43.700 because she
00:48:44.560 heard that the
00:48:45.220 trespassers were
00:48:46.140 on the
00:48:46.660 Capitol grounds.
00:48:48.760 And then she
00:48:49.100 realized that you
00:48:49.760 could put them
00:48:50.260 in jail now
00:48:50.980 because they've
00:48:53.020 gone into this
00:48:53.700 federal offense
00:48:54.720 trespassing.
00:48:56.440 And she
00:48:56.960 seemed pretty
00:48:57.520 fucking happy
00:48:58.300 about it.
00:48:58.780 she seemed
00:49:00.340 happy that
00:49:00.920 she could put
00:49:01.400 the protesters
00:49:02.220 in jail for
00:49:03.240 that.
00:49:04.280 Yeah.
00:49:04.660 So I will
00:49:05.500 say that based
00:49:06.280 on what I've
00:49:06.700 seen so far,
00:49:07.820 I think the
00:49:08.580 working assumption
00:49:09.400 is that it
00:49:10.160 was a
00:49:10.700 government op.
00:49:12.560 Doesn't mean
00:49:13.280 I know that.
00:49:14.940 Doesn't mean
00:49:15.660 it's proven.
00:49:16.920 But the
00:49:17.660 government is
00:49:18.460 guilty until
00:49:19.100 proven innocent
00:49:19.840 and they've
00:49:20.740 made a very
00:49:21.560 big show of
00:49:23.000 not wanting
00:49:23.820 to be transparent.
00:49:24.720 transparent.
00:49:25.200 If you
00:49:25.880 suspect your
00:49:26.600 government could
00:49:27.520 have done
00:49:27.860 something and
00:49:28.900 their response
00:49:29.640 is to give
00:49:30.300 you no
00:49:30.720 transparency,
00:49:32.260 the working
00:49:32.940 assumption is
00:49:33.880 that you've
00:49:34.260 proven their
00:49:34.740 guilt.
00:49:35.860 It doesn't
00:49:36.620 have to be
00:49:37.100 true.
00:49:38.300 In the same
00:49:39.180 way that you
00:49:39.780 say about a
00:49:40.340 citizen,
00:49:41.360 innocent until
00:49:42.060 proven guilty,
00:49:43.180 that doesn't
00:49:43.700 mean they're
00:49:44.060 innocent.
00:49:45.020 That just
00:49:45.700 means that's
00:49:46.180 the standard.
00:49:47.600 And that if
00:49:48.260 you've got a
00:49:48.700 good standard,
00:49:49.480 you're better
00:49:49.760 off than if
00:49:50.280 you don't have
00:49:50.660 a standard.
00:49:51.480 The standard
00:49:52.080 for the
00:49:52.420 government is
00:49:53.900 if you
00:49:54.280 suspect they
00:49:54.980 did something
00:49:55.520 bad and
00:49:56.860 they put up
00:49:57.340 all the
00:49:57.640 walls and
00:49:58.160 bar you
00:49:58.540 from finding
00:49:59.120 out for
00:49:59.560 sure,
00:50:00.260 you have to
00:50:01.140 assume it's
00:50:01.700 true.
00:50:02.580 And you
00:50:02.920 should do
00:50:03.280 all of your
00:50:03.880 actions,
00:50:05.000 your words,
00:50:06.740 and all of
00:50:07.320 your decisions
00:50:07.980 based on that
00:50:09.320 working assumption
00:50:10.100 that it was
00:50:10.920 an op on
00:50:13.340 January 6th.
00:50:14.240 Doesn't mean
00:50:14.760 it is.
00:50:15.700 Likewise with
00:50:16.440 the election,
00:50:17.620 I have no
00:50:18.940 proof of any
00:50:20.520 rigging,
00:50:21.500 personally.
00:50:22.160 I don't have
00:50:22.680 proof, and I
00:50:23.620 don't know how
00:50:24.080 I ever would.
00:50:25.460 But the
00:50:25.980 fact that I
00:50:26.480 can't get
00:50:26.960 it one way
00:50:28.280 or the
00:50:28.580 other, my
00:50:30.160 working assumption
00:50:31.000 is it's
00:50:31.520 rigged, and
00:50:32.440 that it will
00:50:32.780 be rigged
00:50:33.220 again.
00:50:34.120 That's my
00:50:34.540 working
00:50:34.900 assumption.
00:50:35.860 Doesn't
00:50:36.200 mean it's
00:50:36.520 true.
00:50:39.140 Vivek Ramaswamy
00:50:40.200 actually called
00:50:40.920 January 6th
00:50:41.900 Entrapment
00:50:42.460 Day, hashtag
00:50:43.820 Entrapment
00:50:44.520 Day, and he
00:50:46.020 gives you this
00:50:46.760 evidence.
00:50:47.680 He says the
00:50:48.140 Capitol Police
00:50:48.820 fired rubber
00:50:49.960 bullets and
00:50:50.580 stun grenades
00:50:51.120 grenades into a
00:50:51.740 peaceful crowd,
00:50:53.560 yet later
00:50:54.300 willingly allowed
00:50:55.620 members of that
00:50:56.600 crowd to enter
00:50:58.040 the U.S.
00:50:58.560 Capitol building,
00:50:59.760 only to be
00:51:00.440 later tracked
00:51:01.100 down and
00:51:01.400 arrested in
00:51:01.840 prisons.
00:51:02.760 Now, I think
00:51:03.740 you could have
00:51:04.240 some debate
00:51:04.960 about whether
00:51:06.420 that crowd was
00:51:07.240 peaceful.
00:51:09.020 Would you agree?
00:51:10.660 You can debate
00:51:11.580 that, because there
00:51:12.520 were certainly
00:51:12.920 violent members of
00:51:14.160 it.
00:51:14.820 But what I would
00:51:15.620 not debate is
00:51:17.000 that the rubber
00:51:17.560 bullets and
00:51:18.180 stun grenades
00:51:18.860 appeared to be
00:51:20.320 aimed into the
00:51:21.200 middle of the
00:51:22.020 nonviolent group.
00:51:25.040 Am I right?
00:51:26.580 If the only
00:51:27.520 people that were
00:51:28.160 rubber bulleting
00:51:29.080 and stun
00:51:30.880 grenading were
00:51:31.660 the people in
00:51:32.260 the front who
00:51:32.840 were breaking
00:51:33.280 windows and
00:51:34.080 trying to beat
00:51:35.720 to death
00:51:36.160 Capitol Police,
00:51:38.000 then I would
00:51:38.460 say, oh,
00:51:39.020 that's a good
00:51:39.480 use of a
00:51:40.000 rubber bullet
00:51:40.560 and a stun
00:51:41.020 grenade.
00:51:42.920 But why
00:51:44.380 should you
00:51:44.800 assume about
00:51:46.360 the fact that
00:51:47.080 this was done
00:51:48.020 into the
00:51:48.580 center of the
00:51:49.380 peaceful part
00:51:50.160 of the
00:51:50.360 crowd, and
00:51:51.700 then they
00:51:52.020 opened the
00:51:52.440 doors?
00:51:53.680 Now, it
00:51:54.240 doesn't mean
00:51:54.700 that the
00:51:54.960 people opening
00:51:55.480 doors had
00:51:57.200 any communication
00:51:58.520 with the
00:51:59.980 people who
00:52:00.400 fired the
00:52:00.840 rubber bullets
00:52:01.420 and the
00:52:01.700 stun
00:52:01.900 grenades.
00:52:02.900 Might have
00:52:03.380 been different
00:52:03.740 people,
00:52:04.260 just making
00:52:06.120 their own
00:52:06.440 decisions of
00:52:07.320 what they
00:52:07.640 thought would
00:52:08.800 work best.
00:52:11.360 But, if
00:52:13.760 you can't
00:52:14.300 prove it one
00:52:14.980 way or another,
00:52:15.640 and it
00:52:16.360 looks very
00:52:16.980 suspicious,
00:52:17.720 as the
00:52:18.040 vague points
00:52:18.620 out, it
00:52:19.760 smells bad.
00:52:21.820 The video is
00:52:23.240 really damning
00:52:24.100 about why they
00:52:25.480 would do that.
00:52:26.460 Now, it
00:52:26.860 could be as
00:52:27.360 simple as
00:52:27.780 incompetence.
00:52:29.200 It could be
00:52:29.600 that whoever
00:52:30.060 fired the
00:52:30.640 bullets and
00:52:31.120 the stun
00:52:31.460 grenades was
00:52:32.620 just bad at
00:52:33.240 their job and
00:52:33.920 made a bad
00:52:34.340 decision.
00:52:35.000 That would be
00:52:35.400 the most
00:52:35.700 ordinary
00:52:36.040 explanation.
00:52:37.480 But the
00:52:38.120 fact that we
00:52:38.640 can't know
00:52:39.400 what was
00:52:41.820 behind that,
00:52:43.480 your working
00:52:44.180 assumption,
00:52:44.760 should be
00:52:47.340 that it's
00:52:48.940 what it
00:52:49.200 looks like.
00:52:50.360 It looks
00:52:51.000 like they
00:52:51.340 were trying
00:52:51.660 to cause
00:52:52.180 more trouble
00:52:52.700 than they
00:52:52.980 were trying
00:52:53.260 to solve.
00:52:54.240 That's what
00:52:54.560 it looks
00:52:54.960 like.
00:52:56.000 Can I
00:52:56.340 prove that?
00:52:57.100 Do I know
00:52:57.540 what they're
00:52:57.800 thinking?
00:52:58.200 Can I read
00:52:58.600 their minds?
00:52:59.160 No.
00:53:00.060 Nope.
00:53:00.480 Can't prove
00:53:00.920 it.
00:53:01.120 Can't read
00:53:01.480 their minds.
00:53:02.640 And if this
00:53:03.060 were just
00:53:03.460 about individuals,
00:53:04.820 I would say,
00:53:05.840 well, they're
00:53:06.160 innocent until
00:53:06.720 proven guilty.
00:53:07.480 You better
00:53:07.720 bring me
00:53:08.160 some proof.
00:53:09.220 But we're
00:53:09.540 talking about
00:53:10.040 the government,
00:53:11.360 and the
00:53:11.840 government is
00:53:12.380 guilty unless
00:53:13.380 they can prove
00:53:14.000 it with
00:53:14.280 transparency.
00:53:16.340 All right.
00:53:18.020 This story is
00:53:18.900 wacky.
00:53:20.420 So for a
00:53:21.940 few days,
00:53:22.820 for four
00:53:23.420 days, the
00:53:25.540 Secretary of
00:53:27.940 Defense, Lloyd
00:53:28.940 Austin, was
00:53:29.560 hospitalized in
00:53:31.040 intensive care,
00:53:32.520 and the
00:53:33.520 President of the
00:53:34.060 United States
00:53:34.600 was unaware
00:53:35.160 of it.
00:53:35.680 first, but
00:53:37.960 don't worry
00:53:38.580 because his
00:53:39.480 number two
00:53:40.060 was in
00:53:40.480 charge in
00:53:40.900 running
00:53:41.160 things from
00:53:43.540 her vacation
00:53:44.340 in Puerto
00:53:44.840 Rico.
00:53:47.780 That's
00:53:48.340 right.
00:53:49.360 For four
00:53:49.920 days, the
00:53:50.800 United States
00:53:51.600 did not have
00:53:52.540 a military
00:53:53.240 defense, or
00:53:55.560 at least not
00:53:56.200 one that is
00:53:56.940 working the
00:53:57.420 way we
00:53:57.720 wanted to.
00:53:58.760 So the
00:53:59.180 person in
00:53:59.620 charge wasn't
00:54:00.300 even,
00:54:00.880 basically,
00:54:02.020 wasn't
00:54:02.840 operational,
00:54:03.360 and the
00:54:04.680 person second
00:54:05.320 in charge
00:54:05.760 was on
00:54:06.100 vacation.
00:54:08.340 Now, I
00:54:08.900 suppose if
00:54:09.540 something bad
00:54:10.360 happened, she
00:54:11.260 would immediately
00:54:11.820 come back
00:54:12.480 from vacation,
00:54:13.660 but do you
00:54:14.580 feel comfortable
00:54:15.300 with that?
00:54:17.840 Keep in
00:54:18.280 mind that the
00:54:18.860 person who
00:54:19.240 was second
00:54:19.600 in line also
00:54:20.580 did not inform
00:54:21.600 the President
00:54:22.180 that he didn't
00:54:23.520 have a real
00:54:24.540 Secretary of
00:54:25.380 Defense.
00:54:27.200 Now,
00:54:28.560 correct me if
00:54:29.220 I'm wrong.
00:54:29.700 wouldn't you
00:54:32.900 get fired
00:54:33.460 for this?
00:54:35.900 If I were
00:54:37.100 the Secretary
00:54:37.640 of Defense
00:54:38.140 and I did
00:54:38.640 this, would
00:54:39.160 I not get
00:54:39.640 fired?
00:54:41.180 I think
00:54:41.880 obviously I
00:54:42.580 would.
00:54:44.240 Obviously I
00:54:44.980 would.
00:54:45.720 Like, really
00:54:46.180 obviously.
00:54:47.260 Like, this
00:54:48.040 one's black
00:54:49.340 and white.
00:54:50.760 But how
00:54:51.100 about if you
00:54:51.500 were the
00:54:51.740 number two,
00:54:52.940 the Deputy
00:54:53.500 Secretary,
00:54:54.540 who was in
00:54:55.280 charge, but
00:54:56.720 on vacation
00:54:57.300 in Puerto
00:54:57.700 Rico, and
00:54:58.220 you also
00:54:58.760 didn't tell
00:54:59.300 your
00:54:59.660 President,
00:55:01.340 that he
00:55:01.600 didn't have
00:55:02.040 a, you
00:55:02.980 know, Secretary
00:55:04.660 of State, or
00:55:05.840 Secretary of
00:55:06.600 Defense, who
00:55:07.220 was in the
00:55:08.080 country.
00:55:09.360 Shouldn't
00:55:09.840 you be
00:55:10.140 fired for
00:55:10.580 that?
00:55:12.360 I think
00:55:13.040 so.
00:55:14.080 How about
00:55:14.500 for not
00:55:14.980 immediately
00:55:15.520 canceling your
00:55:16.240 vacation when
00:55:17.820 you found
00:55:18.220 out that your
00:55:18.720 boss is
00:55:19.280 incapacitated?
00:55:20.800 I think
00:55:21.440 you should
00:55:21.680 be fired
00:55:22.100 for that,
00:55:23.220 or at
00:55:23.660 least, again,
00:55:25.040 not mentioning
00:55:25.980 it to your
00:55:26.480 boss, the
00:55:27.120 President.
00:55:29.300 Well, here's
00:55:30.080 what I
00:55:30.320 think.
00:55:31.400 The Deputy
00:55:32.840 Secretary of
00:55:33.560 Defense, Kathleen
00:55:34.340 Hicks, is a
00:55:35.000 woman, and
00:55:36.160 the Secretary of
00:55:36.820 Defense, Lloyd
00:55:37.400 Austin, is a
00:55:38.200 black man.
00:55:39.380 I think the
00:55:39.900 first black
00:55:40.840 Secretary of
00:55:41.940 Defense.
00:55:42.580 Do you
00:55:42.960 think that
00:55:44.720 they will be
00:55:45.240 fired for
00:55:46.720 what is
00:55:47.200 obviously a
00:55:47.920 firing offense?
00:55:50.240 I'm going to
00:55:50.920 say no, and
00:55:52.340 I'm going to
00:55:52.600 say this is
00:55:53.200 what the
00:55:53.600 anti-DEI
00:55:54.560 people have
00:55:55.240 been warning
00:55:55.980 everybody
00:55:56.580 about.
00:55:58.440 You can't
00:55:59.320 fire some
00:55:59.840 people.
00:56:00.840 It's just
00:56:01.620 really, really
00:56:02.320 hard to
00:56:02.820 fire people
00:56:04.080 who have
00:56:04.420 been hired
00:56:04.920 for their
00:56:05.580 diversity.
00:56:07.440 Now, does
00:56:07.800 that mean
00:56:08.260 that these
00:56:10.120 two people
00:56:10.600 are not
00:56:11.000 capable of
00:56:11.700 doing their
00:56:12.060 jobs?
00:56:12.420 I'm not
00:56:12.700 saying that.
00:56:13.620 I'm saying
00:56:14.040 there was a
00:56:14.500 specific thing
00:56:15.280 they did that
00:56:16.760 no matter what
00:56:17.560 your general
00:56:18.120 capability was,
00:56:19.240 or no matter
00:56:19.660 what you did
00:56:20.320 up to that
00:56:21.020 point, it's
00:56:22.380 a pretty obvious
00:56:23.280 firing offense.
00:56:24.200 But I don't
00:56:26.300 think it'll
00:56:26.680 happen.
00:56:27.740 Now, you
00:56:28.520 could argue,
00:56:29.200 Scott, you
00:56:29.600 don't know the
00:56:30.080 details, and
00:56:31.120 if you did,
00:56:31.860 maybe you
00:56:32.340 change your
00:56:32.780 mind, and
00:56:33.200 you're right.
00:56:33.980 If I knew
00:56:34.420 the details, I
00:56:35.600 might change
00:56:36.000 my mind.
00:56:37.000 But here's
00:56:37.340 the problem.
00:56:39.060 Our leaders,
00:56:40.160 especially our
00:56:40.820 military leaders,
00:56:41.720 they need to
00:56:42.240 inspire confidence.
00:56:44.200 That's a real
00:56:45.060 key part of
00:56:45.820 their job.
00:56:46.860 Inspire
00:56:47.340 confidence.
00:56:48.740 Did this
00:56:49.260 inspire confidence?
00:56:51.080 No.
00:56:52.400 They're the
00:56:52.740 opposite.
00:56:53.620 And I'm
00:56:53.960 pretty sure
00:56:54.500 that they
00:56:54.900 can't be
00:56:55.360 fired, because
00:56:56.680 one's a
00:56:58.360 woman, one's
00:56:59.100 a black
00:56:59.540 man, and
00:57:00.180 I don't
00:57:00.680 think we
00:57:01.060 can fire
00:57:01.480 them in
00:57:01.880 today's
00:57:02.220 environment.
00:57:03.760 So, well,
00:57:04.560 they're leaders
00:57:05.020 in the
00:57:05.260 military sense.
00:57:08.840 And then
00:57:09.520 Jack Posobiec
00:57:10.560 reports this.
00:57:11.740 Here's what
00:57:12.140 really happened.
00:57:12.860 The White
00:57:13.060 House senior
00:57:13.520 staff knew
00:57:14.660 Austin was
00:57:15.280 in the ICU,
00:57:16.140 but he
00:57:16.340 hit it from
00:57:16.740 Biden.
00:57:17.080 Oh, that's
00:57:17.400 worse.
00:57:18.280 I was
00:57:18.580 saying that
00:57:19.000 they didn't
00:57:19.540 tell the
00:57:20.220 president, but
00:57:20.840 they knew
00:57:21.200 the senior
00:57:21.700 staff knew.
00:57:22.420 OK, so
00:57:24.220 if the senior
00:57:24.740 staff knew,
00:57:27.340 does that
00:57:27.780 put the
00:57:28.780 secretary of
00:57:29.800 defense and
00:57:30.580 the deputy,
00:57:31.820 does that
00:57:32.160 put them in
00:57:32.540 the clear?
00:57:33.460 Because I
00:57:34.000 would suggest
00:57:34.500 they did
00:57:34.960 try to tell
00:57:35.480 the boss,
00:57:36.480 but the
00:57:37.240 staff didn't
00:57:37.960 tell them.
00:57:39.840 I'm going to
00:57:40.540 say that
00:57:40.920 doesn't put
00:57:41.440 them in the
00:57:41.840 clear.
00:57:42.060 I mean,
00:57:44.800 it's a
00:57:44.960 good defense,
00:57:46.840 but if
00:57:47.140 you're the
00:57:47.440 secretary of
00:57:48.580 defense,
00:57:49.920 do you
00:57:51.220 hope somebody
00:57:51.960 tells the
00:57:52.420 president,
00:57:53.180 or do you
00:57:54.080 make sure
00:57:54.460 you talk
00:57:54.880 to him?
00:57:57.100 Why in
00:57:57.640 the world
00:57:58.060 would you
00:57:58.400 not have
00:57:58.840 at least
00:57:59.200 a 10-second
00:57:59.960 conversation
00:58:00.640 with the
00:58:01.120 president if
00:58:02.220 you were
00:58:02.420 going to
00:58:02.600 leave the
00:58:02.940 country
00:58:03.340 undefended?
00:58:05.760 Maybe you
00:58:06.380 didn't know
00:58:06.680 the hospitalization
00:58:07.580 would be that
00:58:08.120 bad.
00:58:08.900 There could
00:58:09.200 be lots of
00:58:09.980 extending
00:58:10.680 circumstances.
00:58:12.840 Could be.
00:58:16.420 All right,
00:58:16.920 let me catch
00:58:17.340 up my
00:58:17.660 comments here.
00:58:18.600 Comments
00:58:19.020 don't scroll
00:58:19.780 on this
00:58:21.040 platform.
00:58:21.780 You have
00:58:21.980 to scroll.
00:58:24.660 All right.
00:58:27.720 Yeah,
00:58:28.320 so in
00:58:29.180 the age
00:58:30.000 of DEI,
00:58:31.480 you have
00:58:32.740 to ask a
00:58:33.100 lot of
00:58:33.300 questions.
00:58:33.760 First of
00:58:34.060 all,
00:58:34.180 the White
00:58:34.440 House
00:58:34.660 senior
00:58:34.920 staff,
00:58:36.160 how many
00:58:36.640 of them
00:58:36.900 are DEI
00:58:37.560 hires?
00:58:38.720 But they
00:58:39.080 hid it
00:58:39.340 from Biden
00:58:39.880 and
00:58:41.560 it's
00:58:43.180 going to
00:58:43.360 be a
00:58:43.580 problem
00:58:43.920 and
00:58:44.580 Biden
00:58:44.880 was
00:58:45.120 livid
00:58:45.940 for the
00:58:46.500 White
00:58:46.660 House
00:58:46.940 staffers.
00:58:48.800 Do you
00:58:49.000 think
00:58:49.200 Biden
00:58:49.560 should
00:58:49.900 be
00:58:50.100 livid
00:58:50.400 about
00:58:50.660 that?
00:58:53.180 Yes.
00:58:55.220 Yes.
00:58:56.240 Even
00:58:56.560 dementia
00:58:57.120 Hitler
00:58:57.440 should be
00:58:57.920 livid
00:58:58.240 about that.
00:58:59.580 Absolutely
00:59:00.180 livid.
00:59:01.260 Do you
00:59:01.420 think he
00:59:01.740 should?
00:59:02.200 Here's,
00:59:02.420 here's,
00:59:02.980 let me
00:59:03.600 make this
00:59:05.000 standard.
00:59:05.420 if he
00:59:06.660 doesn't
00:59:07.120 fire the
00:59:08.260 Secretary
00:59:08.740 of Defense
00:59:09.460 and possibly
00:59:10.740 the Deputy,
00:59:11.880 if he
00:59:12.900 doesn't,
00:59:14.000 he's got
00:59:14.460 to fire
00:59:14.800 his staff.
00:59:16.580 Because if
00:59:17.280 his staff
00:59:17.840 is really
00:59:18.360 the problem,
00:59:19.000 and it
00:59:19.180 might be,
00:59:19.920 so maybe
00:59:20.760 the Secretary
00:59:22.360 of Defense
00:59:23.820 and the
00:59:24.300 Deputy are
00:59:24.800 both in
00:59:25.940 the clear.
00:59:26.720 It's
00:59:27.100 possible.
00:59:29.180 But if
00:59:29.780 they talk
00:59:30.180 to the
00:59:30.480 staff,
00:59:31.280 do you
00:59:31.440 think Biden
00:59:32.040 would have
00:59:32.440 said,
00:59:33.740 well,
00:59:33.960 let me ask
00:59:34.320 you this,
00:59:34.800 do you
00:59:34.980 think Biden
00:59:35.420 would have
00:59:35.720 said,
00:59:35.940 you know
00:59:36.120 what,
00:59:37.120 you stay
00:59:38.120 on your
00:59:38.360 vacation in
00:59:39.040 Puerto Rico,
00:59:40.060 and I'm
00:59:40.820 sure everything
00:59:41.280 will be fine
00:59:41.960 because we
00:59:42.260 have telephones
00:59:42.960 and we'll
00:59:43.900 call you
00:59:44.320 if we need
00:59:44.760 you.
00:59:45.920 I don't
00:59:46.420 know.
00:59:47.680 He might
00:59:48.100 have said,
00:59:48.520 that's a
00:59:48.800 bad look,
00:59:49.440 you better
00:59:49.720 get back
00:59:50.160 here right
00:59:50.500 away.
00:59:51.820 He might
00:59:52.220 have.
00:59:52.820 I think I
00:59:53.360 would have
00:59:53.720 if I had
00:59:54.220 been the
00:59:54.480 president.
00:59:56.960 So yeah,
00:59:57.600 you should
00:59:57.860 be pretty
00:59:58.580 livid about
00:59:59.120 that.
01:00:02.420 What else
01:00:03.000 is happening?
01:00:04.980 So the
01:00:08.600 Daily Wire
01:00:09.220 is reporting
01:00:10.000 that a
01:00:11.380 meta-analysis
01:00:12.400 has been
01:00:12.920 completed
01:00:13.420 on the
01:00:15.000 question of
01:00:15.560 whether
01:00:15.840 minorities in
01:00:16.760 this country
01:00:17.200 are mistreated
01:00:17.960 by the
01:00:18.480 legal system
01:00:19.220 compared to
01:00:20.380 anybody else.
01:00:21.740 What do you
01:00:22.420 think they
01:00:22.700 found?
01:00:26.720 Yeah,
01:00:27.480 it's just
01:00:27.840 what you
01:00:28.120 thought.
01:00:28.420 as a
01:00:30.000 meta-analysis
01:00:30.780 the study
01:00:32.500 found that
01:00:33.460 there was
01:00:35.180 no difference
01:00:35.740 in how
01:00:36.000 people were
01:00:36.420 treated
01:00:36.640 by the
01:00:37.500 legal system.
01:00:38.980 The racial
01:00:39.460 bias just
01:00:40.260 didn't seem
01:00:40.920 to come
01:00:41.260 out of the
01:00:41.640 studies.
01:00:42.920 So there
01:00:43.240 wasn't any
01:00:43.740 racial bias
01:00:44.380 in punishment
01:00:45.000 that they
01:00:46.000 could
01:00:46.300 suss into
01:00:47.120 the meta-analysis
01:00:48.540 which is a
01:00:49.140 study of
01:00:49.520 studies.
01:00:51.440 So,
01:00:52.020 but here's
01:00:52.360 the more
01:00:52.620 interesting
01:00:52.980 part.
01:00:53.920 When they
01:00:54.400 look at
01:00:54.760 individual
01:00:55.320 writings
01:00:56.440 by academics,
01:00:58.420 they find
01:00:59.000 that the
01:00:59.760 academics
01:01:00.300 routinely do
01:01:01.700 this.
01:01:03.200 They
01:01:03.440 routinely
01:01:03.960 show you
01:01:04.600 data that
01:01:05.860 suggests
01:01:06.260 there's no
01:01:06.800 difference in
01:01:07.800 treatment or
01:01:08.700 penalty by
01:01:09.780 race.
01:01:10.980 And then
01:01:11.440 they'll write
01:01:11.900 an article
01:01:12.380 that says
01:01:13.320 it's really
01:01:14.200 terrible that
01:01:15.000 there's such
01:01:15.380 a big
01:01:15.640 difference in
01:01:16.160 the treatment
01:01:16.620 by race.
01:01:18.360 That's
01:01:19.000 right.
01:01:20.300 The
01:01:20.560 academics
01:01:21.140 and the
01:01:21.940 science-y
01:01:23.120 people
01:01:23.520 are so
01:01:26.960 out of
01:01:27.320 control
01:01:27.760 that they
01:01:28.980 can show
01:01:29.460 you the
01:01:29.780 data that's
01:01:30.340 opposite of
01:01:31.040 what they
01:01:31.340 write about
01:01:31.880 and nobody
01:01:32.820 catches it.
01:01:34.520 These are
01:01:35.100 things that
01:01:35.520 nobody caught
01:01:36.340 until somebody
01:01:37.500 looked specifically
01:01:38.460 to see if the
01:01:39.900 article and the
01:01:40.880 data matched
01:01:41.760 and they
01:01:42.200 didn't.
01:01:44.700 Is that
01:01:45.380 amazing?
01:01:47.080 People were
01:01:47.580 really,
01:01:48.140 they were
01:01:48.500 actually showing
01:01:49.160 the data the
01:01:49.960 opposite of the
01:01:50.600 argument they
01:01:51.160 made in the
01:01:51.660 same paper.
01:01:52.140 routinely.
01:01:56.300 Oh my
01:01:57.060 God.
01:01:58.240 Oh my
01:01:58.700 God.
01:01:59.900 Yeah.
01:02:02.020 So,
01:02:03.260 how's that
01:02:03.960 George Floyd
01:02:04.820 situation look
01:02:05.760 now?
01:02:06.940 I think we
01:02:07.720 can say
01:02:08.060 out loud that
01:02:08.620 Derek Chauvin
01:02:09.320 was in the
01:02:11.420 process of
01:02:12.000 being murdered
01:02:12.520 because he's
01:02:13.120 white.
01:02:14.560 And that's
01:02:14.940 pretty obvious
01:02:15.520 at this point.
01:02:17.620 All right.
01:02:19.280 I have
01:02:19.980 discovered,
01:02:20.480 at least
01:02:21.760 in my
01:02:22.180 personal
01:02:22.540 experience
01:02:23.000 on X,
01:02:23.500 that there
01:02:23.780 are way
01:02:24.240 more
01:02:24.580 anti-Semitic
01:02:25.800 commenters.
01:02:28.060 Is that
01:02:28.780 because of
01:02:29.280 the war
01:02:29.620 in Gaza?
01:02:31.560 Or,
01:02:32.680 I speculate
01:02:33.740 these might
01:02:34.580 be bots.
01:02:36.060 And the
01:02:36.360 reason I
01:02:36.700 speculate that
01:02:37.380 is,
01:02:38.180 don't you
01:02:38.680 think that
01:02:39.720 the bad,
01:02:40.640 evil people
01:02:41.360 on the
01:02:41.760 left hired
01:02:43.140 a bunch
01:02:43.500 of people
01:02:43.900 to act
01:02:44.460 anti-Semitic
01:02:45.440 so that
01:02:46.140 X looks
01:02:47.240 like the
01:02:47.640 place that
01:02:48.120 hates Jews?
01:02:48.740 It could
01:02:51.940 be a
01:02:52.220 tic-tac
01:02:52.580 effect.
01:02:54.300 But here's
01:02:55.100 why they
01:02:55.500 look like
01:02:55.940 bots to
01:02:56.600 me.
01:02:56.940 In other
01:02:57.160 words,
01:02:57.560 paid people
01:02:58.300 that are
01:02:59.060 paid to
01:02:59.560 cause trouble.
01:03:00.880 It looks
01:03:01.320 like that
01:03:01.660 because they
01:03:02.080 make the
01:03:02.480 same comments
01:03:03.260 all the
01:03:03.580 time.
01:03:04.600 The similarity
01:03:05.640 of the
01:03:06.060 comments they
01:03:06.660 make,
01:03:07.040 at least in
01:03:07.440 my posts,
01:03:08.420 are hard
01:03:09.460 to ignore.
01:03:10.620 It doesn't
01:03:11.200 look like
01:03:11.600 real people
01:03:12.220 who just
01:03:12.740 had a
01:03:13.180 thought and
01:03:13.740 made a
01:03:14.100 post,
01:03:14.880 because you
01:03:15.200 can recognize
01:03:15.660 that.
01:03:16.460 They're all
01:03:16.760 different.
01:03:17.100 But when
01:03:17.920 they have
01:03:18.160 this
01:03:18.380 commonality
01:03:19.200 to them,
01:03:20.400 I worry
01:03:21.140 that Elon
01:03:21.660 Musk is
01:03:22.160 being set
01:03:22.740 up and
01:03:25.020 that there
01:03:25.580 are bad
01:03:25.980 people
01:03:26.340 pretending
01:03:26.960 to be
01:03:28.260 anti-Semitic.
01:03:30.320 Let me
01:03:30.680 tell you
01:03:30.960 what they
01:03:31.260 say,
01:03:32.140 the common
01:03:32.860 thing that
01:03:33.360 they say.
01:03:36.680 It goes
01:03:37.520 like this.
01:03:39.220 If you're
01:03:40.000 a casual
01:03:40.640 observer of
01:03:41.860 political
01:03:42.320 news,
01:03:43.560 you might
01:03:44.020 assume that
01:03:44.600 most of the
01:03:45.040 things they
01:03:45.420 tell you are
01:03:46.020 reasonably
01:03:46.760 true.
01:03:48.220 The news
01:03:49.020 sometimes is
01:03:49.640 wrong,
01:03:50.520 but reasonably
01:03:51.160 true.
01:03:51.860 So that
01:03:52.180 would be
01:03:52.440 what I
01:03:52.780 call the
01:03:53.180 lowest level
01:03:54.080 of awareness.
01:03:56.140 Would you
01:03:56.880 agree?
01:03:57.480 If you
01:03:57.960 think the
01:03:58.340 news is
01:03:58.820 usually
01:03:59.180 true,
01:04:00.140 that's the
01:04:01.220 lowest level
01:04:01.900 of understanding
01:04:02.620 of your
01:04:03.080 environment.
01:04:04.160 If you
01:04:04.900 think that
01:04:05.400 the traditional
01:04:07.540 news sources
01:04:08.320 are corrupt,
01:04:10.440 then you're
01:04:11.300 a little bit
01:04:11.700 higher level
01:04:12.720 of awareness.
01:04:13.220 awareness.
01:04:14.920 But people
01:04:16.240 don't stop
01:04:16.820 there.
01:04:17.760 I don't.
01:04:19.060 I say,
01:04:19.600 why is the
01:04:20.200 news corrupt?
01:04:21.740 And then I
01:04:22.160 back it up a
01:04:22.760 little bit and
01:04:23.200 I go,
01:04:23.480 oh,
01:04:24.300 Democrats.
01:04:25.520 Because the
01:04:26.140 news is
01:04:27.020 dominated by
01:04:27.780 Democrats.
01:04:28.900 The Democrat
01:04:29.400 Party wants
01:04:30.100 them to
01:04:30.500 support them.
01:04:31.560 So really,
01:04:32.680 you have to
01:04:33.360 go all the
01:04:33.660 way to
01:04:33.900 Democrats.
01:04:35.400 But is it
01:04:37.660 all Democrats?
01:04:38.440 And are
01:04:39.160 Democrats
01:04:39.600 pushing their
01:04:40.600 own buttons?
01:04:42.160 Here's where
01:04:42.920 other people
01:04:43.520 go, but
01:04:44.220 not me.
01:04:45.240 So other
01:04:45.620 people say,
01:04:46.180 it's not the
01:04:46.740 Democrats,
01:04:47.420 Scott.
01:04:48.380 There's
01:04:48.960 somebody behind
01:04:49.720 the Democrats.
01:04:51.360 Well, who's
01:04:51.840 that?
01:04:52.800 Who's behind
01:04:53.480 the Democrats?
01:04:54.900 Well, Scott,
01:04:55.640 it's the
01:04:56.060 WEF and
01:04:57.560 the World
01:04:58.780 Economic
01:04:59.260 Forum.
01:05:00.240 It's
01:05:00.520 Klaus Schwab.
01:05:01.960 So Klaus
01:05:02.520 Schwab is
01:05:03.240 pressing the
01:05:03.780 buttons of
01:05:04.980 the Democrats.
01:05:05.800 The Democrats
01:05:06.260 are pressing
01:05:06.820 the buttons of
01:05:08.200 the press,
01:05:09.360 and the
01:05:09.640 press is
01:05:10.160 pressing the
01:05:10.760 buttons of
01:05:11.300 the voters.
01:05:12.500 So now you
01:05:13.360 understand the
01:05:14.020 whole mechanism.
01:05:15.580 But, wait,
01:05:16.660 we're not done.
01:05:17.960 We're not done,
01:05:19.060 say the
01:05:19.420 commenters who
01:05:20.500 are streaming
01:05:21.160 in lately.
01:05:22.160 They say,
01:05:22.820 Scott, look
01:05:24.140 deeper.
01:05:25.580 It's not the
01:05:26.260 WEF.
01:05:27.560 The WEF is
01:05:28.700 also a puppet.
01:05:30.240 It's really
01:05:30.920 the Jews.
01:05:33.540 Now, that's
01:05:34.320 the comment that
01:05:35.040 I'm getting to
01:05:36.120 almost anything
01:05:37.180 I post.
01:05:38.200 If I post
01:05:39.980 any kind of
01:05:40.680 the press
01:05:41.860 is doing
01:05:42.240 this or the
01:05:42.920 Democrats
01:05:43.320 are doing
01:05:43.760 that, which
01:05:44.260 I often
01:05:44.620 do, somebody
01:05:46.040 will enter
01:05:46.560 the comments
01:05:47.480 and say,
01:05:48.680 dig deeper,
01:05:49.480 Scott.
01:05:50.140 You almost
01:05:51.040 know who
01:05:51.620 they are.
01:05:54.140 Now, that,
01:05:55.560 of course, is
01:05:56.140 something I've
01:05:56.860 always heard on
01:05:58.640 social media.
01:06:01.120 What's different
01:06:02.120 is I hear it
01:06:03.540 on all, it
01:06:04.360 seems like any
01:06:05.040 kind of post
01:06:05.840 that has any
01:06:07.260 kind of
01:06:07.700 conspiratorial
01:06:08.860 people behind
01:06:10.100 the scenes
01:06:10.560 or manipulating
01:06:11.200 you kind of
01:06:11.880 sense.
01:06:12.620 Somebody will
01:06:13.460 come in and
01:06:14.020 say, you're
01:06:14.880 almost there,
01:06:15.740 Scott.
01:06:16.440 You're almost
01:06:17.320 there.
01:06:18.200 You haven't
01:06:18.720 uncovered yet
01:06:19.500 the massive
01:06:20.720 global Jewish
01:06:22.100 conspiracy that
01:06:23.760 is really behind
01:06:24.780 climate change
01:06:26.360 and the WEF,
01:06:27.520 that is really
01:06:28.020 behind the
01:06:28.520 Democrats,
01:06:29.200 that are really
01:06:29.620 behind the media,
01:06:30.420 that are really
01:06:31.000 the ones who
01:06:31.520 are erupting
01:06:32.780 and influencing
01:06:33.720 the people.
01:06:34.980 Now, if you're
01:06:36.560 joining me late,
01:06:37.880 I'm not
01:06:38.480 subscribing to
01:06:39.560 the WEF
01:06:40.580 theory and
01:06:41.780 I'm not
01:06:42.140 subscribing to
01:06:42.980 the Jews
01:06:44.040 running the
01:06:44.600 planet through
01:06:45.240 the WEF
01:06:46.020 and other
01:06:46.800 theories.
01:06:47.720 So I don't
01:06:48.060 subscribe to
01:06:48.700 those.
01:06:49.340 So my only
01:06:50.040 point is I'm
01:06:50.600 seeing more
01:06:51.280 of it.
01:06:52.560 Is anybody
01:06:52.960 else seeing
01:06:53.360 more of it?
01:06:54.580 And do you
01:06:55.000 think it's
01:06:55.360 because of the
01:06:56.020 Gaza situation
01:06:56.880 or is it
01:06:58.160 about Musk?
01:06:59.640 Is it an
01:07:00.200 op?
01:07:01.000 Or just
01:07:01.820 because the
01:07:02.440 news is the
01:07:03.120 news and
01:07:03.840 what it is
01:07:04.260 lately?
01:07:05.540 What do you
01:07:06.160 think?
01:07:07.060 I actually
01:07:07.620 don't know.
01:07:17.400 Okay.
01:07:21.880 I'm just
01:07:22.600 looking at
01:07:22.920 some of your
01:07:23.280 answers to
01:07:23.800 see if
01:07:24.040 anything
01:07:24.360 useful comes
01:07:25.320 out.
01:07:25.540 all right.
01:07:32.080 All right.
01:07:33.980 Well, I
01:07:34.600 will just
01:07:34.940 tell you,
01:07:35.760 I've said
01:07:36.160 this a
01:07:36.480 number of
01:07:36.760 times.
01:07:38.480 In my
01:07:39.220 career, I
01:07:41.660 get to see
01:07:43.060 behind the
01:07:43.600 curtain a lot.
01:07:45.040 So I either
01:07:45.800 know people who
01:07:46.700 are already,
01:07:47.640 you know,
01:07:48.120 behind the
01:07:49.180 curtain or I've
01:07:50.800 spent enough
01:07:51.180 time that I can
01:07:51.840 kind of see
01:07:52.380 what's back
01:07:52.800 there.
01:07:52.960 I spent a
01:07:54.840 ton of time
01:07:55.820 around real
01:07:58.240 successful Jewish
01:07:59.560 professionals in
01:08:00.580 publishing,
01:08:01.660 especially in
01:08:02.260 publishing.
01:08:02.900 There's a high
01:08:03.380 percentage.
01:08:05.400 Syndication,
01:08:06.140 comics, etc.
01:08:07.160 I've never
01:08:08.660 seen any of
01:08:09.220 this Jewish
01:08:09.700 conspiracy.
01:08:11.540 Have you?
01:08:13.500 And it's
01:08:14.040 hard, it
01:08:14.560 would be hard
01:08:15.520 for me to
01:08:16.020 imagine that
01:08:17.880 I wouldn't get
01:08:18.380 a whiff of
01:08:18.900 it.
01:08:19.980 Like, given
01:08:20.980 the access
01:08:21.520 that I have,
01:08:22.900 I wouldn't
01:08:23.300 see any of
01:08:23.780 it.
01:08:24.540 Like, ever.
01:08:26.080 Not even
01:08:26.800 one example.
01:08:29.640 Ever.
01:08:31.480 And yet,
01:08:32.000 there are people
01:08:32.480 who are pretty
01:08:32.900 sure that it's
01:08:33.660 massively true.
01:08:35.340 Here's what I
01:08:35.860 think is true.
01:08:36.460 people do
01:08:39.280 have, you
01:08:40.120 know, extra
01:08:40.740 love for
01:08:42.100 anything that's
01:08:42.780 like themselves.
01:08:44.260 Is that
01:08:44.840 fair?
01:08:45.820 People have a
01:08:46.740 little extra
01:08:47.300 affection for
01:08:48.880 anything that's
01:08:49.620 of themselves or
01:08:50.660 by themselves or
01:08:51.620 reminds them of
01:08:52.360 themselves or
01:08:53.180 as part of their
01:08:54.060 heritage, their
01:08:54.940 cultural.
01:08:55.960 So, do we
01:08:57.640 expect that
01:08:58.420 Jewish Americans
01:08:59.720 would be more
01:09:01.680 supportive of
01:09:02.380 Israel than the
01:09:03.240 average American?
01:09:04.940 Of course.
01:09:05.600 But, it's
01:09:07.500 all transparent.
01:09:08.780 I mean, it's
01:09:09.100 like, nobody's
01:09:10.520 hiding that.
01:09:12.500 And, Israel is
01:09:14.120 a good ally of
01:09:14.920 the United
01:09:15.240 States for
01:09:16.440 good reasons.
01:09:18.240 Now, we
01:09:18.900 could all argue
01:09:19.460 about funding
01:09:20.500 and, you know,
01:09:21.100 those details.
01:09:22.420 But, it would
01:09:24.400 be really hard,
01:09:26.140 really, really
01:09:26.960 hard for me
01:09:28.580 to have gone
01:09:29.300 decade after
01:09:30.460 decade working
01:09:32.000 with high-powered
01:09:33.180 Jewish people
01:09:34.020 professionally,
01:09:35.560 you know,
01:09:35.780 close friends.
01:09:37.620 You know, my
01:09:38.000 college was a
01:09:38.980 highly Jewish
01:09:39.540 population.
01:09:40.420 A lot of them
01:09:40.880 were my closest
01:09:41.580 friends.
01:09:42.720 And, never see
01:09:43.500 any hint of
01:09:44.440 it, of the
01:09:45.520 large Jewish
01:09:46.580 conspiracy.
01:09:48.380 Never?
01:09:50.640 Right?
01:09:51.440 Like, oh, I
01:09:52.100 try to remain
01:09:53.100 open-minded to any
01:09:54.260 possibility, but
01:09:55.280 that's a long
01:09:56.640 time to not see
01:09:57.600 a hint of this
01:09:58.740 massive force that
01:10:00.260 you believe exists.
01:10:02.620 But, like I
01:10:03.120 said, certainly
01:10:04.280 individually, people
01:10:06.440 have, you know,
01:10:07.920 an extra love for
01:10:08.920 their cultural
01:10:09.600 backgrounds.
01:10:10.940 Why not?
01:10:11.920 Nothing wrong
01:10:12.500 with that.
01:10:13.820 So, obviously, we
01:10:15.380 have to make sure
01:10:15.940 that our policies
01:10:17.260 are America-centric.
01:10:20.480 So, we've got to
01:10:21.740 be cautious that
01:10:22.640 we don't get, you
01:10:23.460 know, biased in
01:10:24.100 any direction that's
01:10:24.800 bad for America.
01:10:25.940 But, I don't see it
01:10:26.600 as a gigantic
01:10:27.260 problem.
01:10:29.380 All right.
01:10:30.020 Ladies and
01:10:30.540 gentlemen, on
01:10:31.240 the, on X and
01:10:34.320 on YouTube and
01:10:35.680 on Rumble, thanks
01:10:36.440 for joining.
01:10:37.520 I'm going to say
01:10:37.960 bye and I'm going
01:10:38.920 to talk to the
01:10:40.580 Locals people.
01:10:42.300 Because they're
01:10:42.560 special.
01:10:43.120 And, by the way,
01:10:43.640 if you were
01:10:44.760 subscribing on
01:10:45.440 Locals, you would
01:10:46.120 see the Dilbert
01:10:46.800 comic every single
01:10:47.700 day.
01:10:48.380 It never stopped.
01:10:49.540 By the way, do you
01:10:50.100 know that?
01:10:50.980 There was never a
01:10:51.840 day that Dilbert
01:10:52.540 didn't publish in
01:10:53.560 the last, I don't
01:10:54.700 know, 35 years.
01:10:55.960 So, even when I
01:10:56.620 got canceled, it
01:10:58.220 never missed a
01:10:58.860 day.
01:10:59.040 Seven days a
01:11:00.440 week, every
01:11:01.640 day, since
01:11:03.060 1989.
01:11:04.820 Have not missed a
01:11:06.860 single day since
01:11:09.020 1989.
01:11:10.880 35 years?
01:11:12.340 Yeah.
01:11:12.560 It'll be 35 years
01:11:13.800 in April.
01:11:14.640 So, if you'd like
01:11:18.020 to see that in my
01:11:18.960 Robots Read News
01:11:19.980 comic and God's
01:11:22.000 Debris book in
01:11:22.640 PDF and also the
01:11:25.100 Religion War in
01:11:25.760 PDF and lots of
01:11:26.960 other content, then
01:11:28.320 scottadams.locals.com
01:11:30.080 is where to go.
01:11:31.020 And if you're on
01:11:31.900 any of these
01:11:32.260 platforms, hit the
01:11:33.420 subscribe button,
01:11:34.420 because that helps
01:11:35.580 us all.
01:11:36.520 Thanks for joining.
01:11:37.580 I'll see you tomorrow
01:11:38.180 morning.
01:11:38.480 Bye.