Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2347 CWSA 01⧸08⧸24

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:16.360 I call it Coffee with Scott Adams, because that's sort of what it is.

00:00:20.060 And we're going to talk about the headlines, and the news is all funny today.

00:00:24.120 Sometimes tragic, but mostly funny.

00:00:26.760 And you're going to love it.

00:00:27.820 If you'd like this experience to go to a level that I can't even explain, it's so amazing.

00:00:33.060 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.340 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:40.720 I like coffee.

00:00:42.300 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:45.260 It's the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:49.220 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:52.340 Go.

00:00:52.500 Oh, yeah.

00:01:01.820 So good.

00:01:04.020 Well, have you ever been taught that two wrongs don't make a right?

00:01:10.380 Well, apparently they were lying to us.

00:01:13.040 I have an example of two wrongs that made a right.

00:01:15.200 I saw a post by Owen Schroyer and InfoWars in which they took a hoax about me and incorrectly believed it was true.

00:01:27.580 That was the 4chan hoax that reversed all my vaccination views.

00:01:32.080 So they started with thinking that the hoax was true.

00:01:34.980 That's the first wrong.

00:01:35.920 And then they did create some content about my prank that was a husband apology and I wasn't serious at all.

00:01:44.920 So they treated the hoax of my views as real.

00:01:50.940 But then they added the prank that I added, which they also treated as real.

00:01:56.340 So they treated two unreal things as real.

00:01:59.680 But the net effect, I think, was to make me look good because apparently the user would be left with the impression that I had apologized and made good for being wrong.

00:02:13.780 So two wrongs actually made a right.

00:02:17.960 And I don't mean to brag, but I did that intentionally.

00:02:22.500 I knew I couldn't get rid of the hoax, so I just created another hoax to bury the first hoax.

00:02:30.980 Totally worked.

00:02:33.060 I've got a question about excess mortality.

00:02:36.120 Many people think it's because the vaccinations themselves were dangerous.

00:02:41.240 I don't know that because I don't trust any data about the pandemic.

00:02:46.420 I don't trust data that agrees with me and I don't trust data that disagrees with me.

00:02:50.860 I don't think any of our data is reliable.

00:02:54.040 So I don't know what excess mortality is, but I'd like to add one more hypothesis in case it's not as obvious as the pandemic changed our lifestyles,

00:03:05.200 the vaccination has its own, whatever percentage of injury, and the COVID itself might have some long COVID, but it doesn't look like it,

00:03:14.620 at least in terms of excess mortality.

00:03:17.800 But I would add this following hypothesis.

00:03:21.560 Do you think anything changed with our food supply because of the pandemic?

00:03:28.620 Because we imagine that the pandemic was some kind of a trigger in some way for this excess mortality because of the timing.

00:03:38.320 But didn't our food supply undergo tremendous changes because of what was available and what was not available?

00:03:45.680 Am I wrong about that?

00:03:46.920 And the reason that I have this hypothesis is that, as you know, I've mentioned it a bunch of times,

00:03:54.640 I've altered my own diet radically because I found out there were so many things in just normal food that I had some kind of inflammation reaction to.

00:04:05.060 So with trial and error, after a great deal of effort, I found that if I ate nothing but fresh stuff, like broccoli with nothing but, let's say, butter on it, butter seemed pretty safe.

00:04:19.320 But if I ate food like that, like a real piece of fruit, a real vegetable, a real piece of fish, that I didn't have any inflammation problems and I feel great.

00:04:31.740 Like it's just my entire overall health is completely better.

00:04:36.340 Now, yeah, the biggest thing I cut out was bread, specifically wheat-based products.

00:04:42.060 I think that was my biggest problem.

00:04:44.280 But here's my overall statement.

00:04:48.620 I feel like the food supply got worse recently because when I stopped eating the bad food, the degree of how much better I felt was really shocking.

00:05:00.820 And I'm going to add to my hypothesis.

00:05:02.660 By the way, I'm just spitballing and speculating.

00:05:05.180 Don't take any of it too seriously.

00:05:07.560 But have you noticed that fasting is getting real popular?

00:05:14.340 Like you hear about it all the time, fasting, fasting, fasting.

00:05:17.360 We assume that the mechanism that makes that make us feel better is that you shock your body into being, let's say, more protective

00:05:28.660 if it thinks it has to work a little harder for food or something.

00:05:32.160 I don't know.

00:05:32.740 I guess that's the theory.

00:05:34.300 But I'd like to add another possibility why fasting is popular.

00:05:39.480 It's because all of your food makes you sick.

00:05:44.420 Maybe.

00:05:45.340 I'm just putting that out there.

00:05:47.200 It's possible that fasting makes us feel good simply because food is poison.

00:05:53.640 And so we take a break from poison.

00:05:55.840 And it's maybe not so much because shocking your system is good for you, but probably is.

00:06:01.500 Probably is.

00:06:02.980 Now I'm going to add a third piece of very anecdotal non-confirmation evidence.

00:06:10.740 You know about Jordan Peterson's unusual diet.

00:06:15.920 He had some severe health problems.

00:06:18.700 And now he reports that he feels a lot better on what I believe is an all-meat diet.

00:06:25.700 Do I have that right?

00:06:27.500 Can you give me a fact check on that, Jordan Peterson?

00:06:30.780 He has an all-meat diet now, right?

00:06:35.680 And apparently he feels great.

00:06:38.440 Now, here's the question.

00:06:39.620 Is it because he had some weird allergies that were specific to him?

00:06:44.840 Is it because meat is so good for you?

00:06:48.220 Or, the new hypothesis, the less you eat, the better you feel?

00:06:53.700 And specifically, the less variety you have, the better you feel, so long as you're getting your minerals and your nutrients and stuff.

00:07:03.920 I guess meat must have a lot of that.

00:07:05.920 So, I've got several anecdotal non-proof things that suggest there might be a problem with our food supply that might be going directly to excess mortality.

00:07:20.700 It might be that bad.

00:07:22.360 I think we need to just stop everything and take a deep dive.

00:07:26.660 By the way, I think RFK Jr. is roughly on the same page in terms of doing a deep dive on our food supply just to find out what's real and what's killing us and what's not.

00:07:40.340 All right.

00:07:40.980 There is a California Forever project in California where some rich people are buying up lots of property and they want to build a city.

00:07:50.700 Yes, it will be a walkable city.

00:07:53.620 No, it's not because the WEF got them and they're all turning into communists.

00:07:58.620 No, they don't want to take your car away.

00:08:00.500 No, they don't want to take all of your possessions away.

00:08:03.460 These are actually just California entrepreneur types.

00:08:06.560 But it's a real interesting group.

00:08:08.860 So, among others, I assume, the three of the biggest names in this project are Mark Andreessen, Reid Hoffman, and Lorene Powell Jobs.

00:08:20.760 Now, as I've told you many times, you can't understand anything in the news unless you understand the players and what the players are associated with, like who they're married to, what party they vote, et cetera.

00:08:35.400 And this is weird because Reid Hoffman and Lorene Powell Jobs, Steve Jobs' widow, are the two biggest Democrat supporters.

00:08:49.780 But Mark Andreessen would be very much not that.

00:08:55.340 Now, I don't want to characterize his political views, but I can say for certain that it doesn't map completely to the Democrat position.

00:09:04.880 I don't want to say he's anything that he doesn't say he is.

00:09:08.320 He's probably independent, best guess.

00:09:11.960 But he's kind of the, he might be the least irrational person in that space, meaning that he's just going to sort of look at what makes sense.

00:09:25.640 He's not the ideologue.

00:09:28.720 He's like the real person from real life who just wants to do things that make sense.

00:09:34.460 So, the fact that he's involved gives me a lot of confidence.

00:09:38.320 If it were the other two, I'd worry about God knows what.

00:09:43.680 It would look like some kind of weird Democrat thing that I didn't understand.

00:09:47.800 Like maybe there's a secret agenda or something.

00:09:50.160 But the fact that Andreessen's involved makes me think it could be interesting.

00:09:55.980 This, I've told you many times, that I believe the future that nobody's talking about, as much as they should, is cities built from scratch.

00:10:06.260 I don't believe you're going to fix the cities that exist.

00:10:09.840 I think you're going to have to build brand new cities, which will be great for jobs, getting jobs, great for improving your life.

00:10:19.100 And one of the main things they want to do is lower the cost of living.

00:10:24.180 So, they'll have sustainable energy and affordable homes and everything.

00:10:29.360 This is everything I want right here.

00:10:32.640 So, this is an example of your billionaires doing, I think, like just a pure public service.

00:10:41.440 Because I don't know that they think this is the best investment.

00:10:45.300 It might be.

00:10:46.480 But I don't think that's why they're doing it.

00:10:48.420 To me, I'm guessing that these three are putting their money behind one of the most important things that the country needs,

00:10:55.600 which is to figure out how to make affordable housing, clean energy, and all that.

00:11:01.560 So, good for them.

00:11:02.600 I guess the Veterans Administration has approved psychedelics for veterans.

00:11:11.300 If you don't follow that topic, this is probably one of the most important things that's ever happened for veterans in America.

00:11:21.520 Because the potential for the psychedelics to deal with PTSD, it's unparalleled.

00:11:27.960 There's nothing in its class.

00:11:30.760 And so, we might be seeing the beginning of something that could fundamentally change the lives of maybe, I don't know, a quarter of all veterans.

00:11:43.580 And we're talking about an enormous, enormous benefit to humanity, and specifically the veterans.

00:11:51.720 So, I don't have any comment on it, other than whenever the government or any part of it does anything that makes sense.

00:11:59.140 Like, I stop and go, oh, what's up with that?

00:12:05.100 And I don't know, but was this bipartisan, are psychedelics bipartisan in Congress?

00:12:11.940 I'm not sure if Congress weighs in on this or not.

00:12:14.320 But are there as many Republicans in favor of psychedelics being used medically?

00:12:23.340 Or does anybody know if there's any kind of divide politically?

00:12:27.920 Because this one should not be political at all.

00:12:30.580 There should be zero politics in psychedelics.

00:12:34.020 I don't know the answer to that.

00:12:36.360 Did you know that there's a moon race?

00:12:38.460 It's kind of interesting.

00:12:39.980 Space One, you know, SpaceX gets all the attention.

00:12:43.680 But apparently, there's another rocket going up from some alliance of two big American companies.

00:12:50.640 Which ones?

00:12:52.760 I don't know.

00:12:54.140 Lockheed Martin and Boeing.

00:12:57.740 So, they have a joint venture.

00:12:59.120 They're going to put a rocket up on the moon, look around a little bit, do some exploring.

00:13:03.520 And India's looking at the moon, and China's looking at the moon, and I think Musk has a flight to the moon.

00:13:13.920 The moon's really going to heat up.

00:13:17.200 There's pretty much a guarantee of a moon war, don't you think?

00:13:22.100 How in the world could we not end up with war on the moon?

00:13:27.080 If there are humans on the moon, probably there's going to be a war.

00:13:33.520 You know what would be interesting?

00:13:35.480 This could actually happen.

00:13:37.660 Imagine if, you know, we get a bunch of assets on the moon, sufficient that somebody decides there should be a war.

00:13:45.600 Imagine if the people were on the moon, just say, nah, pass.

00:13:52.480 No, this is Earth call.

00:13:54.680 Start a war. 0.83

00:13:55.480 We need to own the moon. 0.81

00:13:57.180 Yeah, you know, maybe not.

00:13:59.600 No, seriously.

00:14:01.340 You'd better start a war. 0.97

00:14:02.980 Start shooting.

00:14:04.220 You know, maybe not.

00:14:07.360 Could happen.

00:14:09.020 Representative Boebert is entertaining us again.

00:14:11.580 She's allegedly punched her ex-husband in the face.

00:14:15.380 Or I guess, is she still married, or is he ex?

00:14:18.100 I'm not sure.

00:14:19.480 She claims it didn't happen.

00:14:22.520 Blah, blah, blah.

00:14:23.460 But we don't care if it really happened.

00:14:25.700 It's a fun story.

00:14:27.260 So, Representative Boebert, you keep adding to our entertainment, and I'm here for it.

00:14:35.680 I guess Trump's in court today about his immunity claims.

00:14:40.900 Does anybody think he's going to win on immunity?

00:14:42.840 I feel like the whole, the president can't be held responsible for things, I feel like

00:14:52.000 he's not going to win that, at least in any kind of lower court.

00:14:56.940 I'm not too invested in that story, because I think it's going to go exactly the way you

00:15:01.040 think.

00:15:02.400 Vivek Ramaswamy suggests five things to fix our elections.

00:15:06.320 Listen to these five things, and tell me, do these things look practical and possible?

00:15:13.100 Would they actually fix the problem?

00:15:15.980 And if all of that looks good, why aren't we doing it?

00:15:19.740 Number one, single day of voting, so everybody votes on one day.

00:15:25.460 Number two, make election day a national holiday.

00:15:28.080 Perfect, so you don't have to worry about work.

00:15:30.520 Number three, paper ballots.

00:15:32.440 Yes, easier to audit, harder to cheat.

00:15:35.300 Number four, government-issued voter ID to match, blah, blah, blah.

00:15:39.320 Yes, government ID, obvious, simple, smart.

00:15:42.500 Number five, English as the only language used.

00:15:49.620 I don't know.

00:15:51.820 I don't know about that one.

00:15:53.460 I'm lukewarm on that one.

00:15:55.460 I think the issue of English as the primary language is important.

00:16:01.280 But if you're an American citizen, and you need a little help on language, I don't know.

00:16:09.860 I think I'm okay with multilingual voting.

00:16:14.380 So I'm going to disagree with Vivek on that, although it would be presumably good for Republican outcomes.

00:16:22.940 So that one looks a little political to me.

00:16:25.140 But here's my question.

00:16:26.740 Does that look possible?

00:16:27.900 Of course it does.

00:16:29.260 Other countries do exactly this.

00:16:31.660 Would it work?

00:16:32.780 Of course it would.

00:16:33.980 Of course it would.

00:16:35.420 You simplify the system, you make it more auditable.

00:16:38.160 Yeah, of course it would work.

00:16:40.260 Is there any chance it's going to happen?

00:16:42.840 No.

00:16:44.040 No.

00:16:44.840 Do you see the other politicians recommending something this specific?

00:16:50.140 Well, maybe they mentioned it, but why is it only one person's kind of pushing it?

00:16:57.560 Why do you think that is?

00:16:58.840 Because this, ladies and gentlemen, is why you sometimes need an outsider to run for president.

00:17:07.100 In my opinion, I'm going to make an assumption that I call a working assumption.

00:17:12.620 It doesn't mean it's true.

00:17:13.580 Sometimes when you don't know what's true, you've got to pick an assumption because you've got to act somehow.

00:17:20.400 You can't just say, I don't know, I don't know.

00:17:22.640 So my working assumption is that the only reason the elections are not fixed and, and the and is the important part,

00:17:30.860 and you don't see either party talking about it as much as you'd expect, suggests that both parties cheat and they don't want to lose the cheating advantage they have wherever they're cheating.

00:17:42.980 So if you think the Republicans are the good guys and the Democrats are the bad guys, I would suggest that the evidence says no.

00:17:51.320 And that there must be some, something that is attaching both parties to the current system, and it's not good.

00:17:59.960 It's either because maybe people who benefit from the system, let's say selling election machines, might have lobbyists, they might donate to things.

00:18:11.480 One assumes, so I don't know what the story is, but you need an outsider, somebody who has not been bought and paid for, to tell you that you can fix this and it's not hard.

00:18:25.000 No outside, nobody on the inside can do that, apparently, because there's some penalty to it if you're on the inside.

00:18:31.640 So when you say to me, hey, what about experience?

00:18:35.580 I say, hey, fuck your experience.

00:18:39.100 Fuck your experience.

00:18:41.480 What do you want?

00:18:42.980 Do you want a Vivek who can fix your biggest problem, and he just tells you how in simple language?

00:18:51.420 Or do you want the current situation, where our experience, apparently bought off Congress, does nothing for you?

00:18:59.880 You know, give me the outsider, please.

00:19:02.420 Please.

00:19:03.380 Give me the Argentina model. 0.69

00:19:05.840 President Xi is cracking down on corruption some more, says the news.

00:19:14.000 Do you believe that in China, when President Xi says he's cracking down on corruption, that that is exactly what's happening?

00:19:22.000 Or do you believe in the real world it's a way to get rid of your enemies, your political opponents?

00:19:28.600 Oh, coincidentally, the people who said bad things about me are corrupt.

00:19:32.500 Oh, let's get rid of them.

00:19:36.060 Now, let me ask you this.

00:19:38.100 How close are we in the United States to one party getting enough power that they can crack down on the corruption in the other party?

00:19:46.940 We're almost there.

00:19:49.380 If Democrats controlled, you know, each of the organs of government, I believe, without evidence, but based on what we've seen so far, that they would do a fake corruption crackdown just like China.

00:20:02.080 And they'd say, oh, look at all these bribes we found only in Republicans.

00:20:08.060 Why don't you look for bribes in the Democrats? 0.86

00:20:10.600 Oh, yeah, we're sort of looking there, too.

00:20:13.760 Well, look at those Republicans.

00:20:15.500 We're going to put some Republicans in jail.

00:20:17.280 Well, so after watching the obvious political jailings of the January 6th protesters, do you think that the Democrats would stop for one second if they had control of all the organs of government from doing a fake corruption crackdown?

00:20:34.580 Why would they?

00:20:36.120 I mean, it's right there.

00:20:37.320 You can just use it if you want.

00:20:39.120 Of course they would.

00:20:40.220 First of all, it's obvious.

00:20:43.280 It's like an obvious thing to consider.

00:20:45.640 And if they had all the power, every bit of evidence from the past suggests that they would use power they have.

00:20:54.020 So right now they don't have it.

00:20:55.980 But if they owned the whole government, which could easily happen, I think they would.

00:21:04.240 There's a company that makes robots.

00:21:08.800 They've got one that can make a cup of coffee now.

00:21:11.420 You can use your Keurig and put it in the pod and make you a cup of coffee.

00:21:15.940 The company is called AI Robotics and Archer Aviation, I think.

00:21:26.440 The founder of the company is Brett Adcock.

00:21:29.800 Adcock.

00:21:31.460 Now, I don't know much about the founder, this Brett Adcock.

00:21:37.180 But I'm just hoping he's not trans. 1.00

00:21:43.420 Because if he was born a woman and his real last name was Adcock, well, that would just be bad luck.

00:21:52.120 That would be bad luck.

00:21:53.500 So there's no indication he's trans, but I just hope it doesn't happen. 1.00

00:21:59.200 Anyway, yeah, it makes a good cup of coffee.

00:22:01.380 Would you buy a robot that can make a cup of coffee with your coffee machine?

00:22:06.420 Would you buy a machine to use your machine?

00:22:10.360 Well, I would have said no until today.

00:22:13.220 I've been keeping a log of my new Miele coffee machine.

00:22:17.300 It's sort of a built-in, high-end coffee machine that can make fancy coffees.

00:22:22.620 And I kept a record of how many errors the machine gave me per cup of coffee.

00:22:30.860 Now, sometimes I put two cups in one mug, but let's say one use.

00:22:35.100 And so far, to get nine cups of coffee, I've had to solve eight different error conditions.

00:22:42.660 Approximately one error per cup or mug.

00:22:49.300 One error per mug.

00:22:51.400 Sometimes I have to empty out the wastebasket.

00:22:54.680 Sometimes I have to clean the bin.

00:22:57.420 Sometimes I've got to add beans.

00:22:59.340 Sometimes something's not aligned.

00:23:01.160 Sometimes it overflows.

00:23:02.620 Sometimes it gives the wrong amount of coffee.

00:23:04.200 Sometimes there are at least 12 errors that cycle through so routinely that the odds that

00:23:13.740 you could put a cup there and push a button and get a fucking cup of coffee are zero. 0.92

00:23:20.380 Not really, but they're very close to zero.

00:23:24.020 I already fixed two faults this morning for two cups of coffee.

00:23:29.180 Two faults, two cups.

00:23:30.280 So, yes, if you said to me, Scott, we've got this machine that needs service every single

00:23:37.280 time you use it, but we can fix this by getting another more complicated machine that's even

00:23:43.980 less tested.

00:23:48.780 I feel like the process of getting a cup of coffee would then be moved back from fixing

00:23:54.660 the coffee machine all the way back to fixing the errors in the robot itself.

00:24:00.280 So, can you imagine anything that would be more annoying than waking up and needing your

00:24:06.840 first cup of coffee and knowing that you have to go to your computer and decode and unbug

00:24:12.760 your computer so that your computer, or that your robot, so that your robot would be capable

00:24:19.580 to debug the errors in your coffee machine?

00:24:22.160 So, can't wait for the future.

00:24:29.320 Well, Dementia Hitler, hashtag Dementia Hitler, is still trending.

00:24:34.900 Three days.

00:24:36.460 Can I take a victory lap for that?

00:24:38.420 Yes, that was mine.

00:24:40.200 Dementia Hitler. 0.82

00:24:41.200 Apparently, it was immediately sticky and people are using it like crazy and it's going everywhere.

00:24:46.580 So, now, has anybody figured out why that's so sticky?

00:24:52.340 Do you know why?

00:24:53.360 Because people have been calling politicians Hitler forever.

00:24:56.960 We've been saying that Biden has dementia forever.

00:25:01.740 But as I explained on my man cave live stream last night, humor often involves oversimplifying.

00:25:09.860 So, the concept is this.

00:25:12.460 If you simply took a situation or person and you stereotype them, that would be one form

00:25:18.920 of simplification.

00:25:20.700 But it's not quite funny yet if it's just a stereotype.

00:25:24.040 You want to go to that extra level where you over-stereotype them down to the simplest

00:25:29.040 little thing.

00:25:30.060 When I think of Biden, I think of the freedoms he's taking away, you know, all the ways the

00:25:36.280 Democrats are working against free speech.

00:25:38.420 I think of him jailing political opponents.

00:25:43.080 I think of him keeping his opponents off the ballot.

00:25:46.000 Those are all Hitler-ish, you know, dictator-y things. 0.96

00:25:48.900 So, I have this sort of dictator-y feeling about him because of what he's doing.

00:25:53.240 And then when I see him work, I only see dementia.

00:25:57.380 Like, I don't see anything but dementia when Biden's.

00:26:00.140 Do you?

00:26:00.860 I only see his flaws when he talks.

00:26:03.360 I'm like, oh, he's going to fall apart any minute.

00:26:05.320 So, if you were to stereotype Biden, you'd say, he's such a typical Democrat and he's

00:26:15.560 kind of old and, you know, he might be doing something with your freedoms.

00:26:19.380 But then you go all the way to dementia Hitler. 0.88

00:26:24.340 And that's why it's funny.

00:26:26.200 Because dementia Hitler is too much of an oversimplification.

00:26:29.920 And that's why your brain has a laugh reflex.

00:26:33.640 Because you recognize it being true while also being such a gross oversimplification that's not true.

00:26:39.800 So, when you tell somebody something that's both true and not true, they'll laugh.

00:26:46.360 Because their brain can't reconcile the two things.

00:26:49.060 It's true.

00:26:50.120 Well, it's not true.

00:26:51.660 But it's true.

00:26:53.000 Well, it's not really true.

00:26:54.760 That's how humor is formed.

00:26:56.920 Humor is formed when your brain can't reconcile something.

00:27:00.520 Yeah.

00:27:01.840 You can see lots of examples of that.

00:27:03.660 Anyway, so, let's see how Joe's doing.

00:27:08.640 He posted today that Trump proudly posts on social media that the words best describe his 2020 campaign are, quote, revenge, power, and dictatorship.

00:27:20.520 And then Biden says, there is no confusion about who Trump is and what he intends to do.

00:27:26.600 Now, I would consider this Joe Biden trying to get me killed.

00:27:31.220 Let me say that clearly as possible.

00:27:33.660 This is my president who is saying things in public which are inciting violence against me.

00:27:41.180 Why?

00:27:42.200 Because I say that Trump would be a better president.

00:27:45.400 I'm still backing Vivek Ramaswamy.

00:27:47.880 He's my preferred candidate.

00:27:49.960 But if Trump is a candidate, I'm definitely going to back him over Biden.

00:27:53.900 As a Trump supporter, should that happen, and first choice is Vivek, but should that happen, I'm going to have to deal with the fact that the current president is telling the public that I'm supporting a dictator.

00:28:08.680 You don't think that puts me in danger?

00:28:14.360 Of course it does.

00:28:16.600 Of course it does.

00:28:18.480 Yeah.

00:28:18.900 So, not doing so good there.

00:28:20.120 And that does sound a little like a Dementia Hitler business. 0.73

00:28:25.560 And Biden also said that he sent out a meme that says, you can't be pro-insurrection and pro-America.

00:28:33.240 You can't be pro-insurrection and pro-America.

00:28:37.160 So, now the Democrats are absolutely running against the founders of the country.

00:28:41.920 Because the founders of the country were, of course, by definition, revolutionaries and insurrectionists.

00:28:48.220 So, he doesn't like insurrectionists, the very founding of the company, country, that was the concept.

00:28:53.820 And they're also removing statues of the founders because of slavery.

00:29:00.680 You know, it's a good argument, actually.

00:29:03.100 But they really are running against the founding of the country.

00:29:07.160 So, I'm not sure I hate that.

00:29:09.940 But it's an interesting approach.

00:29:13.140 But here's what I say about that.

00:29:16.240 You got it backwards.

00:29:18.320 In my opinion, you have to be willing to overthrow your country or you're no American.

00:29:24.020 I would never consider you an American, like in the concept way, not the legal way. 1.00

00:29:30.580 But I would never consider you sufficiently American if you're not willing to use your Second Amendment rights.

00:29:37.160 You have to have a gun and overthrow your government should they need a good overthrowing.

00:29:42.400 Now, the caveat is it should be for reasons, like good reasons, as in violating the Constitution grotesquely, something like that.

00:29:50.720 But if you're not willing to overthrow your government, you're no American.

00:29:56.060 The right and, indeed, the obligation, the obligation to overthrow your government is built right into the Constitution.

00:30:07.020 That's what the Second Amendment is about.

00:30:08.660 Well, at least my interpretation of it.

00:30:11.060 I guess others might interpret it differently.

00:30:13.680 But your First and your Second Amendment are very squarely about making sure your government doesn't abuse you.

00:30:21.900 If you're not willing to overthrow your government, you're no American.

00:30:26.720 I say the same thing about the flag.

00:30:28.380 If you tell me I can't burn the flag, well, then the flag has no meaning to me.

00:30:34.720 The only value to me, just personal, of an American flag is that I can burn the fuck out right in front of you.

00:30:42.620 I can take that thing and I can set that on fire right in front of the Congress of the United States.

00:30:49.760 That's why I worship it.

00:30:52.300 That's why I respect the flag.

00:30:54.380 A flag I can't destroy right in front of my leader, there's no flag to me.

00:31:00.720 That's a piece of cloth.

00:31:03.000 But if it's indestructible because you can burn it and it gets stronger, that's my flag.

00:31:13.000 Yeah.

00:31:14.300 So, he gets all of that wrong.

00:31:19.700 But the Democrats are running their insurrection.

00:31:22.020 So, the Colorado Secretary of State says she won't count the ballots that have Trump's name on them.

00:31:29.340 So, we're actually at the point where the Democrats are in open insurrection.

00:31:34.420 They're literally trying to keep candidates off the ballot.

00:31:37.720 Now, they're using their lawfare, but there's no reasonable person who thinks this isn't a coup.

00:31:44.980 I mean, it's like a pre-coup or a pre-insurrection, keeping your strongest candidate off the ballot.

00:31:50.700 So, that's happening.

00:31:56.100 But at least the country is doing well economically, right?

00:32:00.820 So, at least jobs are doing great.

00:32:04.640 Well, the new report is the job report's been fake.

00:32:08.660 The New York Post says the initial U.S. employment reports overstated the jobs this last year by 439,000.

00:32:20.700 They overstated the jobs for the past year by 439,000.

00:32:29.420 And we've all been saying, hey, things are going great.

00:32:33.280 They made up the numbers.

00:32:35.640 They just make them up.

00:32:37.260 Now, when I say they make them up, here's how they figure it out.

00:32:41.500 They've got – that was more than 40% of the payroll growth in 2023.

00:32:50.380 So, the payroll data was off by 40%.

00:32:57.020 40%.

00:33:00.180 Now, ask yourself, how many people will see the story about the numbers being corrected

00:33:05.120 versus how many saw all the monthly stories about Biden's doing great and employment has never been better?

00:33:11.940 Well, 90% of the country sees the good employment numbers and maybe 10% maximum would see that, you know, by the way, they're all wrong.

00:33:23.460 None of them are right.

00:33:24.660 So, that's a typical dementia Hitler play. 0.85

00:33:34.080 So, yeah.

00:33:35.200 So, employment not so good.

00:33:37.060 But at least we have a solid vice president to back up the president who has dementia.

00:33:42.640 What did she say lately?

00:33:45.200 Kamala Harris, vice president.

00:33:47.160 She said, at this moment, we are seeing extremists ban books and attempt to erase, overlook, and rewrite the dark parts of American history.

00:33:56.320 And she says, for example, the Civil War, which was about slavery.

00:34:01.380 The Civil War, which was about slavery.

00:34:04.680 Now, as you know, our vice president is an idiot.

00:34:08.700 And her favorite salad is word salad.

00:34:11.460 But here's the problem with rewriting history.

00:34:16.760 You know history was never right to begin with, right?

00:34:21.160 Has anybody not realized that if you tried to write the history of, let's say, the last 10 years that you've been paying attention, how could you?

00:34:31.560 We don't agree on the basics.

00:34:33.580 We don't even agree if there was an insurrection in 2020.

00:34:37.740 It was on all the news, fully covered, explored in detail.

00:34:43.400 And we don't know if it happened.

00:34:45.480 I mean, I know it didn't happen.

00:34:47.180 But the news says it does.

00:34:48.920 So what are the historians going to write?

00:34:51.040 Are the historians going to write that it happened?

00:34:53.020 Now, if you know that you could not possibly write an accurate history of our current time, do you think we ever could?

00:35:04.320 Really?

00:35:05.760 Really?

00:35:06.840 Do you think there's anything in American history, the way it's taught, that's true?

00:35:12.080 I think the basic facts of, like, you know, who was president, who died, who won the war, maybe.

00:35:22.100 Well, even that.

00:35:23.600 World War II, you could argue who won the war.

00:35:25.840 Was it Russia or, you know, the other allies?

00:35:29.000 So even basic stuff like who won the war in World War II is a little ambiguous.

00:35:35.320 Was it kind of just Russia?

00:35:36.800 With a little help from us?

00:35:40.800 So, Kamala, I would say that don't worry about history getting rewritten, because it was never true to begin with.

00:35:48.040 And that's my honest opinion.

00:35:49.920 My honest opinion is there's nothing in American history that isn't designed for brainwashing.

00:35:57.840 That's it.

00:35:58.820 You don't know what anybody actually did or why.

00:36:03.140 All right.

00:36:03.940 But here's the good news.

00:36:07.700 Now, you probably heard that not only was our, the head of our military, who's not the president,

00:36:17.920 so Secretary of Defense Austin was in the hospital and I guess he was in intensive care,

00:36:26.860 but at least his deputy was in charge.

00:36:29.360 Well, his deputy, we found out, didn't know that he was incapacitated in the hospital.

00:36:35.840 That's right.

00:36:37.220 So the top of our military was unavailable for four days.

00:36:44.300 The number two was, didn't know for two of those days that he was unavailable.

00:36:50.900 So we didn't have number one and number two under the president.

00:36:55.420 We didn't have them.

00:36:56.480 But thank God, thank God, during that time, the United States was not being invaded.

00:37:06.540 Imagine if we'd been invaded, like at the time when our military people are not available.

00:37:13.360 Next story is, our border has been invaded.

00:37:16.260 RNC Research says that a CBS poll, it says 75% of Americans see the situation on the border as either a crisis or very serious.

00:37:27.520 That's right.

00:37:27.900 25% say not so bad.

00:37:32.020 25%.

00:37:32.580 Yeah, it's the same 25% who gets every poll question wrong.

00:37:39.700 I don't know if it's the same people, but there's always 25%. 0.89

00:37:43.720 And how about Rasmussen?

00:37:46.080 Rasmussen says 65% of likely voters in the U.S. believe it is accurate to describe the current situation with migrants at the border with Mexico as, quote,

00:37:57.880 an invasion.

00:38:00.840 Two-thirds of likely voters call what's happening an invasion.

00:38:06.260 At the same time, our secretary of defense was unavailable, and the number two didn't even know he was unavailable while she was on vacation in Puerto Rico.

00:38:18.240 So, I mean, all of this makes you think that our secretary of defense is, like, some kind of a fucking idiot, right?

00:38:27.720 Like, you know, don't you sort of think, oh, my God, is our secretary of defense some kind of, like, idiot or something?

00:38:34.920 Well, I saw End Wokeness on X, good account to follow, talked about this story and included a photo.

00:38:41.580 That I've never seen the pairing of a point of view and a photo that matched so well.

00:38:50.740 So now that we know that our secretary of defense is incompetent, I'd like to show you a photo, a real photo.

00:38:57.920 I don't think this is Photoshop.

00:39:01.000 A real photo of, during the pandemic, Secretary Austin reviewing the troops.

00:39:07.880 All right?

00:39:09.160 So here's the guy that you have in charge of making your important decisions in your military.

00:39:14.020 Ready for this?

00:39:15.180 Here you go.

00:39:17.880 There you go.

00:39:19.140 That's right.

00:39:20.260 He's got a whole Darth Vader headgear on because he's trying not to get any germs on his face.

00:39:27.280 It's like he's wearing a lampshade on his head, and he's reviewing the troops.

00:39:33.340 And now, do you know what those troops are thinking as he walks by with that lampshade on his head?

00:39:40.700 Here's what they're not thinking.

00:39:43.060 I would die for you.

00:39:45.680 I will charge that hill if you tell me to.

00:39:49.960 Because you're inspiring confidence with that lampshade on your head.

00:39:56.320 Oh, I'm sorry.

00:39:58.280 Anyway, ABC7 Eyewitness News talked about January 6th.

00:40:08.140 They called it an insurrection without any quotes around it.

00:40:11.460 So it's just an insurrection, according to them.

00:40:13.920 And then they say it has been described as the worst attack on American democracy since the Civil War.

00:40:22.520 Yep.

00:40:23.000 So I looked at the photos, and it showed the photos of January 6th with the attack on democracy.

00:40:33.180 And I don't know, maybe I have some vision problems or something.

00:40:36.280 But I looked at the photo, and I could see lots of protesters.

00:40:40.840 And I could see the building, the Capitol building.

00:40:43.720 And I could see some, you know, the Capitol police.

00:40:46.400 And I could see clouds, and I could see, you know, landscape and background.

00:40:52.800 But you know what I didn't see in the picture?

00:40:54.740 I didn't see any democracy.

00:40:57.460 Apparently they were attacking democracy.

00:41:00.300 But I didn't see any.

00:41:01.860 I saw a building.

00:41:04.520 Can somebody give me a list of which buildings are also democracy?

00:41:09.020 So if I trespass, I'll know if I'm attacking democracy in the worst way of the republic.

00:41:14.460 All right.

00:41:16.680 Can we call these fucking idiots at AB7 News who say that somebody attacked democracy?

00:41:23.700 Is that the dumbest thing you've ever heard?

00:41:26.600 How exactly do you attack democracy?

00:41:29.720 And then once you've got it, how do you kill it?

00:41:33.500 Do you beat it with a stick?

00:41:35.540 Where's the democracy?

00:41:37.100 Is it behind you now?

00:41:38.860 Do you see the democracy?

00:41:40.920 It's behind me, isn't it?

00:41:42.760 Oh, no.

00:41:43.640 Oh, no.

00:41:43.940 Is it behind me?

00:41:45.680 Tell me.

00:41:46.300 Is it behind me?

00:41:48.220 I don't want to look.

00:41:51.140 All right.

00:41:52.200 Well, I think it is behind me, and I'm going to attack it.

00:42:01.700 There.

00:42:03.160 That's called attacking democracy.

00:42:05.080 Why do you use a term like attacking democracy that literally means nothing?

00:42:13.740 Well, first of all, what were they doing?

00:42:16.740 They were literally there to defend democracy.

00:42:22.000 Am I wrong?

00:42:23.780 Did I miss the whole point of January 6th?

00:42:26.060 I thought the whole point was that the protesters believed that democracy had not been served.

00:42:31.400 Wasn't the entire point defending democracy?

00:42:34.440 How in the world are you a news organization and you somehow missed the primary point of the protest?

00:42:43.440 The primary point.

00:42:45.260 It's like a seminal moment in American history.

00:42:48.980 And you didn't know what the protesters were asking for?

00:42:52.200 You missed the basic, the most fundamental part that they thought the election wasn't fair.

00:42:59.300 Are Democrats so lost that they believed that the protesters knew it was a fair election,

00:43:06.660 but thought they could get away with an insurrection?

00:43:09.020 Is that what they've been told?

00:43:11.480 Are they that dumb?

00:43:13.720 That they think something like that happened?

00:43:18.360 Let me catch up your comments over here.

00:43:22.860 Yeah.

00:43:23.900 Well, anyway.

00:43:24.500 There's a report from Unusual Wales that BlackRock is going to lay off 600 employees,

00:43:34.500 mainly from their ESG division, as Fox News is reporting this.

00:43:40.020 600 employees, mostly from their ESG division.

00:43:45.520 How many employees did they have for ESG?

00:43:48.360 It wasn't all 600, but they had hundreds?

00:43:51.840 Did they really have hundreds?

00:43:54.500 Of DEI employees?

00:43:58.700 That's really embarrassing.

00:44:01.360 Imagine being the head of BlackRock and the news reports that you had hundreds,

00:44:07.400 hundreds of ESG employees.

00:44:11.620 That is so irresponsible.

00:44:13.920 If you were a stockholder and you found that out, you should be pretty mad.

00:44:18.380 That is such a violation of fiduciary responsibility.

00:44:26.200 But at least BlackRock is correcting their mistake.

00:44:29.840 Now, how did the Democrats and the Democrat Party,

00:44:34.360 how did they rationalize the fact that even their biggest allies

00:44:37.680 have found out that the Democrat approach to ESG is a mistake?

00:44:42.400 At some point, it's going to get embarrassing if the business Democrats are disagreeing

00:44:49.560 with the political Democrats, and they are at this point.

00:44:52.920 Do you know who else doesn't like DEI?

00:44:55.380 Bill Ackman.

00:44:57.460 Bill Ackman is not a Republican.

00:45:00.280 Just more on DEI.

00:45:05.500 So Google's head of DEI, Adrielle Parker, I think,

00:45:13.900 she's on a video that's going around today saying that she thinks it's terrible

00:45:18.700 that some parents are teaching their kids not to judge people by their skin color.

00:45:25.640 It sounds like I'm saying that wrong, doesn't it?

00:45:27.740 Right.

00:45:28.920 She's angry that parents are teaching their kids not to treat Black people special.

00:45:37.580 Now, those are my words, but she says it as clearly as that.

00:45:42.220 Isn't that amazing?

00:45:44.320 That she's in such a bubble that she thought that saying that publicly,

00:45:50.100 or at least on a video that could be public,

00:45:52.500 she thought that that was a perfectly defensible position.

00:45:57.740 She actually wants people to be judged by their color and their immutable characteristics.

00:46:03.920 Now, the reason for it is, if you don't put them in a special class, i.e. judge them,

00:46:10.340 you can't improve their situation.

00:46:13.360 So I understand the point of it is to take people that she thinks are in a worse situation

00:46:18.380 and elevate them.

00:46:19.820 But you can't do that without treating them like there's something about Black people

00:46:25.620 or there's something about women or there's something about LGBTQ that's different.

00:46:32.700 And I can't believe she doesn't get fired for that.

00:46:38.420 If that were my company, I would fire her immediately, even if I liked DEI. 1.00

00:46:43.060 So even if I liked DEI, I would fire somebody for saying this in my company.

00:46:49.500 Imagine being a white person and going to work for this company.

00:46:54.080 Imagine being a white person applying for a job at Google

00:46:57.160 when you know that they're saying explicitly that they want to make different policies

00:47:04.200 based on your color.

00:47:05.960 It's very overt.

00:47:07.300 They're not hiding anything.

00:47:08.140 Why would you work there?

00:47:11.240 Unless they offered you like a million dollars a year,

00:47:14.280 you know you're not going to get promoted.

00:47:16.600 They're saying very clearly that you're not,

00:47:19.400 you're very unlikely to be promoted if they have any options

00:47:22.560 that would give them more diversity.

00:47:24.640 They're not going to pick you.

00:47:26.480 So I recommend a question for all white male job applicants. 0.87

00:47:30.240 If you're applying for a corporate job,

00:47:34.200 I suggest the following question.

00:47:35.920 And you might want to write this one down or replay it

00:47:39.220 because the exact question matters.

00:47:41.980 Let's say you're in a job interview.

00:47:44.340 Ask this question if you're a white male job applicant.

00:47:47.600 Let's say you're in Google, trying to get a job at Google.

00:47:50.820 I would ask this question.

00:47:52.080 Do you have a DEI group in this company?

00:47:55.640 And if so, how can I be sure I would have equal opportunity for advancement here?

00:48:00.360 How could I be sure that as a white male,

00:48:06.280 I would have equal opportunity for advancement in your company?

00:48:11.100 Ask that question.

00:48:13.360 Watch what happens.

00:48:16.040 Yeah.

00:48:16.280 If you start asking that question, DEI will die

00:48:18.780 because you can't answer that question.

00:48:21.600 If somebody is honest, they're going to say,

00:48:23.620 well, the whole point of DEI is to favor people who don't look like you.

00:48:29.680 So if you were to work here, I'll be honest,

00:48:32.440 your odds of promotion would be less

00:48:34.260 than if you worked at a company that wasn't trying to address DEI.

00:48:40.640 Why would you work for a company that would tell you

00:48:44.000 people like you are going to be disadvantaged at this company?

00:48:48.000 It's really direct.

00:48:50.140 I'm not guessing.

00:48:51.480 I'm not like reading between the lines.

00:48:54.140 It's very direct.

00:48:55.820 It would not be good to be white and male to work at Google 1.00

00:48:59.340 because they have a whole department to make sure it is bad for you

00:49:03.000 and good for other people in other ways.

00:49:06.600 So, yes, if you're white and male, ask that question.

00:49:09.940 You probably won't get hired if you ask that question,

00:49:11.760 but if they can't answer the question to your satisfaction,

00:49:15.660 maybe you don't want to work there.

00:49:19.580 I would go so far as to say, as I did on X,

00:49:23.840 there are no respected business leaders in favor of DEI.

00:49:28.340 There are no respected business leaders in favor of DEI.

00:49:32.480 Now, you're going to say to yourself,

00:49:33.960 but what about this one?

00:49:35.260 What about that one?

00:49:36.420 And I would say, no.

00:49:37.960 It's sort of a trick statement

00:49:40.840 because if you're in favor of DEI,

00:49:43.860 there's no way I could respect that.

00:49:46.400 I don't have any respect for a leader, their leadership.

00:49:50.820 And Mark Cuban is out front with pro-DEI.

00:49:54.780 And I would say I don't respect him as a manager.

00:49:58.060 I think he might be very capable and awesome in a lot of ways.

00:50:02.120 I like him in general,

00:50:03.120 but I can't respect him as a business leader

00:50:05.900 if he's leading with DEI.

00:50:08.640 You lose all respect for that.

00:50:11.040 That's, well, I mean, what else is there to say?

00:50:17.300 Paul Graham, who does have respect as a business leader,

00:50:20.780 one of the titans of Silicon Valley,

00:50:24.280 he said in a post today,

00:50:25.820 he said there are two ways to achieve equality of outcomes.

00:50:28.460 Either you're going to raise up the bottom

00:50:30.000 or push down the top.

00:50:32.260 And since raising up the bottom is so laborious,

00:50:37.460 people focused on equality of outcomes

00:50:39.420 will always be tempted

00:50:40.780 by the seemingly easier expedient

00:50:44.060 of pushing down on the top.

00:50:47.800 There you have it.

00:50:49.600 Why do I say that Paul Graham

00:50:51.560 is a respected business leader?

00:50:53.860 This is why.

00:50:55.340 This is why.

00:50:56.480 He's not saying he doesn't like diversity.

00:50:59.420 He's not saying that.

00:51:00.500 He's saying very clearly

00:51:02.940 that there are two ways to get it.

00:51:05.420 You push down the top

00:51:06.520 or you elevate the bottom.

00:51:08.320 Elevate the bottom is nearly impossible

00:51:10.540 because there isn't a supply

00:51:13.440 that's big enough for all the companies.

00:51:16.080 Right?

00:51:16.980 If they had a supply, it'd be easy.

00:51:19.040 Like, oh, need more black people? 1.00

00:51:20.940 Hire more black people. 1.00

00:51:22.200 But the supply is low.

00:51:23.340 So, yes, the thing you would do

00:51:27.380 if you don't want to do something hard

00:51:29.060 is to do the easy thing.

00:51:31.800 Now, I'm going to add to that

00:51:33.360 that the two predictive things

00:51:36.160 are laziness and follow the money.

00:51:39.300 Right?

00:51:39.960 The two most predictive things.

00:51:42.260 If you can say to yourself,

00:51:43.720 oh, we're designing this system

00:51:45.160 and somebody says,

00:51:46.320 you know, people are lazy.

00:51:47.840 They're not going to do all of that.

00:51:49.840 That's a pretty good prediction.

00:51:52.780 Right?

00:51:53.260 And if you say that you'll make more money

00:51:55.200 doing this,

00:51:56.020 that's a pretty good prediction too.

00:51:57.700 So, laziness

00:51:58.700 and follow the money.

00:52:01.780 Two of your best,

00:52:03.820 strongest variables

00:52:04.740 for predicting the future.

00:52:06.960 And who knows that?

00:52:08.340 Paul Graham knows that.

00:52:09.820 So, that's why he's a respected leader.

00:52:12.000 Who else knows that?

00:52:13.300 Elon Musk

00:52:14.080 knows DEI is a problem

00:52:16.140 and was posting on it today.

00:52:17.860 Do you respect Elon Musk's

00:52:20.560 business capability?

00:52:23.380 Yes.

00:52:25.200 Yes.

00:52:27.920 All right.

00:52:28.900 Yeah, there are no business leaders

00:52:30.380 who support DEI

00:52:32.160 who I would respect for their...

00:52:34.960 I would respect them as humans

00:52:36.160 but not as leaders.

00:52:38.980 The New York Times

00:52:40.240 just published a story

00:52:41.440 in favor of standardized testing

00:52:45.040 because the idea of

00:52:46.200 getting rid of the SATs

00:52:48.540 so you have better

00:52:49.320 diversity performance.

00:52:52.800 Looks like that wasn't a good idea

00:52:54.420 according to the New York Times.

00:52:55.900 So, now even the New York Times

00:52:57.280 is against

00:52:58.000 the DEI overreach.

00:53:01.480 So, that should tell you

00:53:02.340 that there's definitely

00:53:03.220 something happened here.

00:53:06.240 And then, of course,

00:53:07.280 I think I mentioned

00:53:08.040 that there was a study

00:53:09.120 that showed that

00:53:10.940 what we all had been told

00:53:13.240 was massive racial discrimination

00:53:15.400 and criminal punishment.

00:53:17.500 Turns out there are no studies

00:53:18.740 that support that.

00:53:20.000 Well, a meta-study

00:53:21.500 doesn't support it.

00:53:23.700 There might be individual ones

00:53:25.140 with flaws.

00:53:26.240 But if you look at the body

00:53:27.480 of research

00:53:28.240 in whole,

00:53:30.040 there does not seem to be evidence

00:53:31.700 of racial discrimination

00:53:33.480 and criminal punishments.

00:53:34.680 but

00:53:38.260 academia

00:53:40.180 as part of the same story

00:53:42.280 academia

00:53:43.620 has been telling us forever

00:53:45.160 that it was true.

00:53:47.920 So,

00:53:48.560 if you think about it,

00:53:49.760 the whole George Floyd

00:53:50.980 Summer of Love riots

00:53:52.500 were because

00:53:53.920 we all believed

00:53:55.040 well,

00:53:56.440 whether you believed or not

00:53:57.360 we'd all been told

00:53:58.560 whether you believed or not

00:54:00.480 that there was a huge disparity

00:54:02.280 and that the black people

00:54:04.180 were getting just

00:54:04.880 abused by the police

00:54:06.900 and also

00:54:07.960 the criminal justice system

00:54:10.440 in general.

00:54:11.780 Now,

00:54:12.880 that came from academics

00:54:14.620 because we rely on the academics

00:54:16.760 to tell us

00:54:17.500 what are the facts.

00:54:19.620 So,

00:54:20.160 I would say that the entire

00:54:21.460 George Floyd riots

00:54:23.180 were,

00:54:23.800 I blame them on our academics.

00:54:26.140 I would blame

00:54:27.200 climate change craziness

00:54:29.000 on

00:54:29.460 our academics,

00:54:32.120 not just the scientists,

00:54:34.180 but really the academics

00:54:35.340 because they're the ones

00:54:36.560 training the young people

00:54:37.800 to be active about it,

00:54:39.480 et cetera.

00:54:40.400 In fact,

00:54:41.600 where does DEI come from?

00:54:43.620 The academics.

00:54:45.240 I would say that

00:54:46.340 our biggest

00:54:47.080 problem in the country

00:54:48.900 is that the academics

00:54:49.980 are fucked up. 0.99

00:54:51.440 you could pick

00:54:55.440 literally any problem

00:54:56.920 in the country

00:54:57.560 and trace it back

00:54:58.860 to a flaw

00:54:59.500 in our academics,

00:55:00.820 meaning the people,

00:55:02.400 the people

00:55:02.840 or the teachers

00:55:03.500 in charge.

00:55:05.060 Pick any.

00:55:05.660 Pick any problem.

00:55:08.200 Literally any problem.

00:55:09.320 And then,

00:55:09.660 as soon as you think of it,

00:55:11.400 say to yourself,

00:55:12.060 oh,

00:55:13.120 wait a minute.

00:55:14.320 If the public

00:55:15.160 had been better educated,

00:55:16.600 we wouldn't have that problem

00:55:17.600 at all.

00:55:18.020 You can literally

00:55:21.340 pick anything

00:55:21.960 from unemployment

00:55:22.980 to war

00:55:23.920 to DEI

00:55:25.640 to the divisiveness

00:55:27.320 of the country.

00:55:30.180 It's all

00:55:31.360 our colleges.

00:55:33.460 It's literally

00:55:34.700 just that.

00:55:36.700 If they were teaching

00:55:37.860 useful things

00:55:39.140 that were not propaganda,

00:55:40.780 we wouldn't be

00:55:41.840 in any of these problems.

00:55:43.240 I don't think.

00:55:45.500 Do you think

00:55:46.140 we'd be

00:55:46.600 having a massive

00:55:47.640 mental health problem

00:55:48.980 just from TikTok?

00:55:52.340 Or is it the fact

00:55:53.640 that the academics

00:55:54.480 would support

00:55:55.380 the massive

00:55:56.920 gender reassignment

00:55:58.520 surgeries

00:55:58.980 of children?

00:56:00.740 Probably the academics

00:56:01.880 are on that page.

00:56:03.440 I don't think

00:56:04.240 we have any problem

00:56:05.020 in the country

00:56:05.540 that couldn't be fixed

00:56:06.540 by replacing

00:56:08.640 the academics

00:56:09.380 with less

00:56:10.560 propaganda

00:56:11.760 and crazy people.

00:56:15.340 All right.

00:56:17.720 Apparently,

00:56:18.500 the William Penn

00:56:19.760 statue's

00:56:20.500 coming down

00:56:21.120 and

00:56:23.000 Joel Pollack

00:56:25.520 asked if

00:56:26.220 Pennsylvania

00:56:27.260 will have to be

00:56:28.160 renamed.

00:56:28.640 I guess William Penn

00:56:29.380 had some slaves

00:56:31.080 or did something

00:56:31.820 people didn't like.

00:56:32.820 I don't know.

00:56:33.460 It doesn't matter.

00:56:34.500 But he's being canceled.

00:56:36.900 Now,

00:56:37.280 we have a problem

00:56:38.140 because we have

00:56:38.640 a whole state

00:56:39.320 that's named after him,

00:56:40.460 Pennsylvania.

00:56:41.760 So,

00:56:42.680 Joel was asking

00:56:44.100 for some

00:56:44.760 new ideas

00:56:46.300 for how to

00:56:47.500 rename Pennsylvania

00:56:48.400 when it comes to that.

00:56:50.180 His best suggestion

00:56:51.360 was Federmania.

00:56:53.080 I like Federmane.

00:56:55.080 Like you add

00:56:55.920 Maine at the end

00:56:56.800 of Federmane.

00:56:57.440 That'd be good.

00:56:59.580 But I had a few

00:57:00.080 other suggestions.

00:57:03.720 PenisSylvania.

00:57:05.600 PenisSylvania.

00:57:06.500 Because people

00:57:08.820 don't like

00:57:09.480 William Penn.

00:57:11.440 He's getting canceled.

00:57:13.120 But people

00:57:13.560 love penises. 1.00

00:57:15.000 Penis is still

00:57:15.820 very popular.

00:57:17.260 So,

00:57:17.480 PenisSylvania.

00:57:18.680 Or how about

00:57:19.400 this one?

00:57:19.980 Since we're making

00:57:20.840 wordplay jokes

00:57:22.040 about it.

00:57:22.680 How about

00:57:23.060 PunSylvania?

00:57:25.180 Pun.

00:57:25.420 So,

00:57:26.840 we'll rebrand

00:57:28.360 the whole state

00:57:29.120 around

00:57:29.800 wordplay.

00:57:32.200 Yeah.

00:57:32.960 PunSylvania.

00:57:33.640 I'd like that.

00:57:34.240 I would love to go to

00:57:34.960 PunSylvania.

00:57:36.120 Or how about

00:57:36.780 make it more like

00:57:37.540 Las Vegas

00:57:38.160 where they have

00:57:39.040 legal prostitution

00:57:40.040 and then you

00:57:41.240 could rename it

00:57:41.900 to PunSylvania.

00:57:44.020 Pun.

00:57:44.920 PunSylvania.

00:57:47.640 Now,

00:57:48.140 that's only funny

00:57:48.920 if you know

00:57:49.600 that sometimes

00:57:50.060 people say

00:57:50.780 PunTang

00:57:51.360 to refer to sex.

00:57:53.340 If you didn't

00:57:54.060 know that,

00:57:55.100 PunSylvania is 1.00

00:57:55.920 not funny.

00:57:56.360 If you do know

00:57:56.840 that,

00:57:57.120 you probably

00:57:57.380 had a good laugh.

00:58:00.200 PunSylvania.

00:58:01.140 Speaking of

00:58:01.640 Fetterman,

00:58:02.560 John Fetterman,

00:58:03.320 senator from

00:58:03.980 PunSylvania,

00:58:05.880 he's co-sponsoring

00:58:07.140 a bill

00:58:07.760 that would

00:58:09.200 ban

00:58:10.240 members of

00:58:11.240 Congress

00:58:11.560 from stock

00:58:12.220 trading.

00:58:14.440 And

00:58:14.800 I say to

00:58:17.360 myself,

00:58:18.340 why can't

00:58:19.760 we get two

00:58:20.380 Fettermans

00:58:20.920 and trade a

00:58:22.260 Schiff?

00:58:23.660 Like,

00:58:24.300 I'm okay

00:58:25.480 with this

00:58:26.140 kind of

00:58:26.640 Democrat.

00:58:28.940 I'm okay

00:58:29.880 with this

00:58:30.300 one.

00:58:31.180 He seems

00:58:31.780 to legitimately

00:58:32.740 not like

00:58:33.440 bullshit.

00:58:35.040 That's all.

00:58:36.120 That's all

00:58:36.520 I ask.

00:58:37.900 You know,

00:58:38.160 I don't have

00:58:38.520 to agree

00:58:38.820 with all

00:58:39.360 of your

00:58:39.600 policies.

00:58:41.620 But if

00:58:42.340 you're

00:58:42.540 opposed

00:58:42.900 to

00:58:43.180 bullshit,

00:58:45.020 well,

00:58:45.460 you've

00:58:45.720 got me.

00:58:47.740 You've

00:58:48.240 got my

00:58:48.660 interest.

00:58:49.840 Fetterman

00:58:50.200 is

00:58:50.620 unambiguously

00:58:51.480 opposed

00:58:52.140 to

00:58:52.460 bullshit.

00:58:53.780 And

00:58:54.360 letting

00:58:54.700 congressional

00:58:55.380 people

00:58:55.900 beat

00:58:56.800 the

00:58:57.000 averages

00:58:57.380 by

00:58:58.020 trading

00:58:58.340 his

00:58:58.600 stocks,

00:58:59.260 that's

00:58:59.840 some

00:59:00.040 bullshit

00:59:00.360 right

00:59:00.640 there.

00:59:01.240 That's

00:59:01.520 some

00:59:01.660 serious

00:59:01.980 bullshit.

00:59:03.300 So

00:59:03.600 Fetterman

00:59:04.680 doesn't like

00:59:05.160 bullshit.

00:59:06.540 He's

00:59:06.780 got me.

00:59:08.820 Well,

00:59:10.460 Hakeem

00:59:10.860 Jeffries,

00:59:12.540 Democrat,

00:59:15.420 he's

00:59:15.920 against,

00:59:16.800 he says

00:59:17.260 that election

00:59:17.780 denial is

00:59:19.080 a sickness

00:59:19.680 that is

00:59:20.340 poisoning our

00:59:21.180 democracy.

00:59:22.960 Yeah,

00:59:23.280 it's a

00:59:23.620 sickness,

00:59:24.200 election

00:59:24.480 denial.

00:59:25.600 That's what

00:59:25.960 he says

00:59:26.240 this year.

00:59:26.700 In 2018,

00:59:27.460 he said

00:59:27.900 the elections

00:59:29.360 were rigged.

00:59:29.900 a lot

00:59:33.480 of politics

00:59:34.120 only works

00:59:34.960 because the

00:59:35.580 public

00:59:35.840 doesn't

00:59:36.180 really pay

00:59:36.600 attention.

00:59:38.580 It takes

00:59:39.240 about two

00:59:39.760 seconds to

00:59:40.520 find

00:59:40.920 videos of

00:59:42.280 like compilation

00:59:43.000 videos of

00:59:43.720 all the

00:59:44.220 famous

00:59:44.560 Democrats,

00:59:45.540 the same

00:59:46.080 ones who

00:59:46.480 were saying

00:59:46.860 that Trump

00:59:48.860 was questioning

00:59:50.520 an election

00:59:50.980 and he

00:59:51.260 shouldn't have.

00:59:51.960 All of

00:59:52.340 them literally

00:59:52.900 questioning past

00:59:53.760 elections.

00:59:55.500 But how many

00:59:56.000 people see it?

00:59:56.720 Only the

00:59:58.500 people who

00:59:58.960 are on

00:59:59.380 X and

01:00:00.380 also doing

01:00:01.020 political

01:00:01.440 stuff and

01:00:02.720 have right

01:00:04.220 leaning sources

01:00:05.080 in their

01:00:05.600 feed,

01:00:06.400 nobody else

01:00:06.920 sees it.

01:00:08.300 So to

01:00:08.660 them,

01:00:08.920 they just

01:00:09.200 see some

01:00:09.800 Democrats

01:00:10.240 say,

01:00:10.660 hey,

01:00:11.820 stop

01:00:12.200 questioning

01:00:12.660 elections.

01:00:13.380 And they're

01:00:13.460 like,

01:00:13.620 oh,

01:00:13.760 that sounds

01:00:14.080 good.

01:00:15.060 Sounds like

01:00:15.520 a reasonable

01:00:15.880 thing to

01:00:16.240 say.

01:00:21.200 Oh,

01:00:21.880 Chairwoman

01:00:22.960 Elise

01:00:23.360 Stefanik is

01:00:24.460 opposed to

01:00:25.460 DEI.

01:00:26.720 Excellent.

01:00:28.540 Good to

01:00:29.060 know.

01:00:31.740 Well,

01:00:32.180 let's

01:00:32.360 see.

01:00:35.660 Semaphore

01:00:36.480 is reporting

01:00:37.680 that Biden's

01:00:38.900 team,

01:00:40.400 when they

01:00:40.840 meet with

01:00:41.260 the press,

01:00:42.240 they bring

01:00:43.100 a spreadsheet

01:00:43.800 of the

01:00:45.080 press's

01:00:45.680 reporting so

01:00:47.100 that they

01:00:47.500 can give

01:00:47.940 them a

01:00:48.280 grade and

01:00:48.900 criticize

01:00:49.280 their

01:00:49.640 reporting and

01:00:50.700 tell them

01:00:51.060 where they

01:00:51.380 can do

01:00:51.700 better.

01:00:53.100 Or

01:00:53.380 Democrats.

01:00:53.940 Now,

01:00:56.600 obviously,

01:00:57.280 the press

01:00:57.760 doesn't have

01:00:58.980 to do

01:00:59.280 what they're

01:00:59.600 told,

01:01:00.600 but given

01:01:01.140 that we

01:01:01.560 all think

01:01:02.000 that they

01:01:02.300 do,

01:01:03.620 apparently,

01:01:04.220 so like

01:01:04.820 the New

01:01:05.080 York Times

01:01:05.600 and the

01:01:05.880 Washington

01:01:06.100 Post have

01:01:06.580 come in

01:01:07.020 to meet

01:01:07.940 with the

01:01:08.420 Biden

01:01:08.640 team,

01:01:09.260 and the

01:01:09.460 Biden

01:01:09.660 team will

01:01:10.520 take out

01:01:10.940 their

01:01:11.120 spreadsheet

01:01:11.520 and say,

01:01:11.980 you know,

01:01:13.160 and they

01:01:13.640 actually did

01:01:14.120 say this,

01:01:15.000 you're spending

01:01:15.540 a little too

01:01:16.020 much time

01:01:16.500 on this,

01:01:17.640 will you

01:01:17.840 spend a

01:01:18.320 little bit

01:01:18.620 more time

01:01:19.140 talking about

01:01:19.700 how bad

01:01:20.140 Trump

01:01:20.380 is?

01:01:20.620 That's

01:01:22.260 actually

01:01:22.580 happening.

01:01:23.960 Yeah.

01:01:24.360 The

01:01:24.580 Democrats

01:01:25.000 are literally

01:01:25.840 grading the

01:01:26.940 press for

01:01:28.420 how close

01:01:29.300 to the

01:01:29.640 Democrat

01:01:30.020 message

01:01:30.700 they are,

01:01:31.640 and they're

01:01:32.360 dinging them

01:01:33.320 if they're

01:01:33.600 not close

01:01:34.100 enough.

01:01:34.820 Now,

01:01:35.380 is there

01:01:35.920 any penalty

01:01:36.540 if the

01:01:37.980 press decides

01:01:38.980 to ignore

01:01:39.440 the White

01:01:39.780 House and

01:01:40.140 just do

01:01:40.420 what they

01:01:40.660 want to

01:01:40.900 do?

01:01:41.840 Yes,

01:01:42.560 there's a

01:01:42.920 penalty.

01:01:43.660 They won't

01:01:44.000 have access,

01:01:44.920 so they

01:01:45.540 won't be

01:01:45.840 able to

01:01:46.060 write a

01:01:46.420 story that

01:01:46.940 says,

01:01:47.380 I talked

01:01:47.700 to this

01:01:48.080 person in

01:01:48.660 the White

01:01:49.060 House,

01:01:49.440 they just

01:01:49.920 won't take

01:01:50.360 your call.

01:01:52.320 So yes,

01:01:52.900 the White

01:01:53.380 House actually

01:01:54.160 has control

01:01:55.120 of the

01:01:55.420 press by

01:01:56.420 simply turning

01:01:57.420 on or off

01:01:58.200 access to

01:01:59.620 people who

01:02:00.060 can give

01:02:00.380 them quotes

01:02:00.900 and news.

01:02:03.980 Well,

01:02:04.780 Biden

01:02:05.200 administration

01:02:05.700 is talking

01:02:07.400 to Mexico

01:02:08.040 about helping

01:02:10.040 out stopping

01:02:11.040 the flow

01:02:11.920 of immigrants,

01:02:13.380 but Mexico

01:02:14.180 has some

01:02:14.640 demands.

01:02:16.060 So here's

01:02:16.480 what Mexico

01:02:16.980 wants in

01:02:17.520 return for

01:02:18.440 being more

01:02:18.940 active in

01:02:19.580 stemming the

01:02:20.240 flow of

01:02:20.800 immigrants.

01:02:23.160 They'd like

01:02:23.860 to get

01:02:25.600 $20 billion

01:02:26.440 to,

01:02:29.040 let's

01:02:29.300 say,

01:02:30.740 to deploy

01:02:32.300 and,

01:02:32.840 I don't

01:02:32.980 know,

01:02:33.500 basically $20

01:02:34.460 billion for

01:02:35.200 improvements in

01:02:36.340 Mexico and

01:02:38.020 Latin America

01:02:39.660 and Caribbean

01:02:40.200 countries.

01:02:40.880 They want to

01:02:41.280 suspend the

01:02:42.140 U.S.

01:02:42.820 blockade of

01:02:43.500 Cuba.

01:02:45.100 Did you

01:02:45.760 know that

01:02:46.280 Mexico cares 0.97

01:02:47.600 about the

01:02:48.060 blockade of

01:02:48.680 Cuba?

01:02:48.980 what's

01:02:50.860 that all

01:02:51.140 about?

01:02:52.660 Is it

01:02:53.280 just a

01:02:53.880 Hispanic

01:02:54.960 thing?

01:02:57.160 Like,

01:02:57.460 why do

01:02:57.680 they care?

01:02:59.600 I don't

01:02:59.820 know.

01:03:00.620 But they

01:03:01.960 want us to

01:03:02.600 suspend the

01:03:03.420 U.S.

01:03:03.660 blockade of

01:03:04.140 Cuba,

01:03:04.860 remove all

01:03:05.520 sanctions

01:03:05.960 against

01:03:06.420 Venezuela.

01:03:08.400 Again,

01:03:09.520 why do they

01:03:10.240 care so much

01:03:10.720 about Venezuela?

01:03:13.080 And grant

01:03:13.920 at least 10

01:03:14.580 million Hispanics

01:03:15.380 living in the

01:03:15.900 U.S.

01:03:16.180 the right to

01:03:16.560 remain and

01:03:17.020 work legally.

01:03:17.600 Let me ask

01:03:20.520 you this.

01:03:21.420 Do those

01:03:22.020 requests sound

01:03:24.160 like a good

01:03:26.040 negotiating

01:03:26.860 starting point?

01:03:28.540 Obviously,

01:03:29.120 they wouldn't

01:03:29.440 get all of

01:03:29.920 it.

01:03:30.520 Or does it

01:03:31.260 sound to

01:03:31.640 you like

01:03:31.980 the cartels

01:03:32.920 told the

01:03:34.060 government of

01:03:34.600 Mexico,

01:03:35.820 pretend you're

01:03:36.540 going to play

01:03:37.240 along, but

01:03:38.360 ask for things

01:03:39.280 they can't

01:03:39.780 possibly give

01:03:40.520 you?

01:03:41.360 Yeah, it's a

01:03:41.800 poison pill.

01:03:42.760 That's exactly

01:03:43.340 right.

01:03:44.260 This is

01:03:44.860 obviously a

01:03:45.500 poison pill.

01:03:46.100 This is

01:03:48.180 the clearest

01:03:48.940 signal yet

01:03:49.700 that the

01:03:50.220 cartels

01:03:50.820 control the

01:03:51.660 government,

01:03:51.980 and they're

01:03:52.780 telling the

01:03:53.140 government,

01:03:53.760 don't fix

01:03:54.140 this,

01:03:54.800 because we're

01:03:55.080 making a

01:03:55.520 ton of

01:03:55.800 money charging

01:03:56.880 people to

01:03:57.620 illegally enter

01:03:58.420 the United

01:03:58.800 States.

01:03:59.160 Like, a

01:03:59.500 ton of

01:03:59.840 money.

01:04:00.680 It's not a

01:04:01.280 side business.

01:04:02.120 It's like

01:04:02.600 billions.

01:04:04.500 So, yeah,

01:04:05.440 it's exactly

01:04:06.160 what it looks

01:04:06.600 like.

01:04:08.400 All right.

01:04:08.980 The story

01:04:12.500 of Doe

01:04:12.820 Ackman's 0.97

01:04:13.380 wife keeps

01:04:14.040 getting more

01:04:14.540 interesting,

01:04:15.220 but I

01:04:15.740 think I'll

01:04:16.620 spare you

01:04:17.140 that.

01:04:17.840 If you're

01:04:18.160 not following

01:04:18.660 that story,

01:04:19.700 it would be

01:04:19.980 too hard to

01:04:20.440 catch up.

01:04:21.700 But I'll

01:04:23.120 just say that

01:04:23.720 Doe Ackman

01:04:24.320 went after

01:04:24.960 the Harvard

01:04:26.860 president for,

01:04:28.860 first of all,

01:04:29.900 not saying the

01:04:30.440 right things

01:04:30.920 about Gaza

01:04:31.620 and Israel,

01:04:32.620 but then also

01:04:33.580 for plagiarism.

01:04:35.680 And then

01:04:36.480 people went

01:04:37.680 after Bill

01:04:38.160 Ackman,

01:04:38.960 but that

01:04:39.640 didn't work,

01:04:40.380 so they

01:04:40.760 went after

01:04:41.180 his wife.

01:04:43.040 So now

01:04:43.420 it's like a

01:04:44.220 full-court

01:04:44.720 press to go

01:04:45.360 after his

01:04:45.740 wife.

01:04:46.740 And Ackman

01:04:47.240 is asking

01:04:48.160 publicly,

01:04:49.420 is this a

01:04:50.440 new standard?

01:04:51.320 Because it

01:04:51.640 used to be

01:04:52.300 that you

01:04:53.860 could fight

01:04:54.320 as hard as

01:04:54.780 you want in

01:04:55.300 the business

01:04:55.760 or political

01:04:56.400 realm against

01:04:57.720 the individual,

01:04:59.220 more the

01:04:59.700 business realm.

01:05:00.740 But you

01:05:01.060 don't go

01:05:01.340 after the

01:05:01.700 family.

01:05:03.100 In politics,

01:05:03.960 it's a little

01:05:04.280 different.

01:05:05.240 But in

01:05:07.080 business,

01:05:07.500 you don't

01:05:07.680 go after

01:05:08.060 the wife.

01:05:09.540 And his

01:05:10.540 I guess

01:05:12.260 they're

01:05:12.400 political

01:05:12.780 opponents.

01:05:14.140 So he's

01:05:14.540 a business

01:05:15.020 guy who's

01:05:15.720 entered a

01:05:16.160 political field

01:05:17.080 with his

01:05:17.820 latest activism

01:05:18.740 to discover

01:05:20.240 that that

01:05:21.540 rule about

01:05:22.100 not going

01:05:22.580 after the

01:05:22.940 family doesn't

01:05:23.580 appear to

01:05:24.040 apply once

01:05:24.800 you go

01:05:25.060 into the

01:05:25.400 political

01:05:25.760 domain.

01:05:27.060 See

01:05:27.240 Hunter

01:05:27.580 Biden,

01:05:28.360 right?

01:05:29.740 Yeah.

01:05:30.100 Family is

01:05:30.760 definitely fair

01:05:31.440 game.

01:05:32.020 It shouldn't

01:05:32.280 be,

01:05:32.820 maybe.

01:05:33.380 But it

01:05:33.700 is fair

01:05:34.040 game in

01:05:34.420 the political

01:05:34.880 realm and

01:05:35.340 has been

01:05:35.680 for a long

01:05:36.060 time.

01:05:36.300 So he's

01:05:37.680 now got to

01:05:38.740 defend his

01:05:39.180 wife.

01:05:40.680 And the

01:05:41.040 hardest part

01:05:41.620 is that his

01:05:42.080 wife apparently

01:05:42.740 met with Brad

01:05:43.680 Pitt several

01:05:44.220 times,

01:05:44.880 professionally.

01:05:45.940 She's an 0.95

01:05:46.360 architect.

01:05:47.040 He likes

01:05:47.680 architect stuff.

01:05:48.840 He has some

01:05:49.200 project he was

01:05:49.880 interested in.

01:05:50.880 But his wife

01:05:51.480 is apparently

01:05:52.080 brilliant and

01:05:54.340 super attractive,

01:05:55.600 and she was

01:05:56.080 having lunch

01:05:56.620 with Brad Pitt.

01:05:57.340 man, you've

01:06:00.580 got to be

01:06:00.960 real secure

01:06:01.760 if your

01:06:03.720 wife is 1.00

01:06:04.140 having lunch

01:06:04.800 with Brad

01:06:05.520 Pitt.

01:06:06.560 You've got

01:06:07.060 to be

01:06:07.260 really secure,

01:06:08.300 and I guess

01:06:08.660 he is.

01:06:10.660 I'm not sure

01:06:11.340 if it happened

01:06:11.680 when they

01:06:11.980 were married

01:06:12.380 yet or when

01:06:13.180 the timing

01:06:13.560 was, but

01:06:14.140 it's part of

01:06:15.100 the story,

01:06:15.800 human interest,

01:06:16.660 that doesn't

01:06:16.980 have anything

01:06:17.340 to do with

01:06:17.760 the main

01:06:18.020 part of

01:06:18.260 the story.

01:06:20.240 Oh, but

01:06:20.860 now there's

01:06:21.380 also the

01:06:21.920 story that,

01:06:23.320 of course,

01:06:24.060 Jeffrey Epstein

01:06:24.720 became part

01:06:25.300 of the story.

01:06:25.860 So, apparently

01:06:27.460 when Bill

01:06:28.320 Ackman's 0.97

01:06:28.780 wife was 0.99

01:06:29.940 working at

01:06:30.520 the, I

01:06:30.740 think she

01:06:31.040 might have

01:06:31.320 been the

01:06:31.560 head of

01:06:31.840 the MIT

01:06:32.360 lab, or

01:06:34.360 she worked 0.95

01:06:34.980 there, and

01:06:36.160 I guess

01:06:36.720 Jeffrey Epstein

01:06:37.520 once went

01:06:38.220 to a

01:06:38.700 presentation

01:06:39.540 there and

01:06:40.160 donated $150,000

01:06:41.620 to the lab.

01:06:43.360 So, she

01:06:43.940 had a brief

01:06:45.160 little donor

01:06:46.960 meeting with

01:06:47.580 him, nothing

01:06:48.080 special, but

01:06:49.460 you can smear

01:06:50.760 anybody with

01:06:51.400 that association.

01:06:53.220 So, these

01:06:53.820 are pretty

01:06:54.740 terrible

01:06:55.340 attacks against

01:06:56.700 his wife, which

01:06:58.120 I do not

01:06:58.780 agree with, and

01:07:00.920 I hope he

01:07:01.440 goes nuclear

01:07:02.080 on that.

01:07:04.020 All right, I

01:07:04.480 think he

01:07:04.720 will.

01:07:07.300 What's

01:07:07.740 happening after

01:07:08.260 the war in

01:07:09.060 Israel? 0.53

01:07:10.200 So, Tony

01:07:10.720 Blinken's over 0.98

01:07:11.920 there in the

01:07:12.380 Middle East, he's 0.87

01:07:13.080 going to talk

01:07:13.460 with the United

01:07:14.960 Arab Emirates, and

01:07:16.420 he's talking to

01:07:17.040 the Saudis about

01:07:18.100 how to do

01:07:19.820 things after the

01:07:20.620 war in Gaza

01:07:21.140 is over.

01:07:23.140 Apparently, the

01:07:23.880 United States has

01:07:24.840 taken the

01:07:25.360 ridiculous

01:07:25.920 position that

01:07:27.620 the Palestinians

01:07:28.380 should be

01:07:28.980 running Gaza

01:07:29.680 after things

01:07:31.160 settle down.

01:07:33.100 Israel has 1.00

01:07:33.740 taken the

01:07:34.260 more smarter

01:07:35.180 position, at

01:07:36.100 least General

01:07:36.940 Galantes, that

01:07:38.740 Israel is always 1.00

01:07:40.320 going to have to

01:07:40.800 have the security

01:07:42.140 control of the

01:07:43.480 area.

01:07:44.160 So, even if

01:07:45.220 someone else is

01:07:47.220 sort of running

01:07:47.880 and making sure

01:07:48.440 the garbage gets

01:07:49.520 picked up, Israel

01:07:51.060 is just going to

01:07:51.720 control it.

01:07:52.260 And that's the

01:07:53.620 only rational

01:07:54.220 thing.

01:07:54.900 It would make

01:07:55.380 no sense at

01:07:56.080 all to do

01:07:56.600 this and then

01:07:57.160 rebuild it with

01:07:59.080 all the people's

01:07:59.760 minds the same

01:08:00.700 and maybe worse

01:08:01.420 because of the

01:08:02.960 war.

01:08:03.940 So, it would be

01:08:04.680 ridiculous, absurd

01:08:06.580 to put it back

01:08:08.140 together.

01:08:09.280 So, in my

01:08:09.760 opinion, they

01:08:10.280 should either

01:08:10.660 leave it

01:08:11.260 unoccupied,

01:08:13.240 which has its

01:08:14.140 own horrific

01:08:16.120 impact on the

01:08:17.200 locals, or they

01:08:18.740 have to put

01:08:19.180 somebody else

01:08:19.740 in charge

01:08:20.160 like the

01:08:20.600 Saudis, with 0.99

01:08:22.620 Israeli military

01:08:23.960 control, but

01:08:26.140 maybe some kind

01:08:26.960 of Saudi or

01:08:27.740 third party who

01:08:29.340 is willing to

01:08:30.000 deprogram you.

01:08:31.480 Now, I'll say

01:08:31.980 it again, you

01:08:33.320 can deprogram the

01:08:34.520 kids, the

01:08:36.240 adults not so

01:08:37.420 much, but if

01:08:38.720 you had full

01:08:39.460 control of the

01:08:41.120 children's

01:08:41.620 environment,

01:08:43.120 meaning that when

01:08:43.980 they went to

01:08:44.460 school, they

01:08:45.180 would only hear

01:08:45.960 what you wanted

01:08:47.260 them to hear,

01:08:47.740 you could

01:08:48.360 deprogram them.

01:08:49.900 You still have

01:08:50.440 the problem that

01:08:51.080 they go home and

01:08:51.740 their parents get

01:08:52.420 them, but if

01:08:54.100 you could make

01:08:55.340 sure that, except

01:08:56.620 for the parents,

01:08:58.600 you could deprogram

01:09:00.600 them right in the

01:09:01.240 schools, you could

01:09:01.940 deprogram them.

01:09:03.340 But if you just

01:09:04.320 put the same

01:09:05.600 influence back in

01:09:07.460 Gaza, you're going 1.00

01:09:08.080 to get the same

01:09:08.620 situation.

01:09:09.460 That would be

01:09:09.680 crazy.

01:09:10.660 So, I don't even

01:09:11.420 know if the United

01:09:12.020 States is serious

01:09:13.040 about having the

01:09:14.420 Palestinians run

01:09:15.440 Gaza.

01:09:15.860 like that doesn't

01:09:17.740 even sound smart

01:09:18.600 enough to be

01:09:19.120 serious.

01:09:19.580 It might be just

01:09:20.760 something they have

01:09:21.380 to say so they

01:09:22.260 sound a little bit

01:09:23.060 neutral when we're

01:09:24.500 not.

01:09:25.560 So, I'm not sure

01:09:26.460 they believe it.

01:09:27.660 It might be just

01:09:28.260 something they need

01:09:28.880 to save for

01:09:29.400 position.

01:09:32.480 And that, ladies 0.97

01:09:33.340 and gentlemen,

01:09:35.180 concludes the best

01:09:36.500 live stream you've

01:09:37.320 seen so far today.

01:09:38.320 And, thanks for

01:09:41.440 joining on your

01:09:42.520 X platform and

01:09:44.060 rumble and on

01:09:45.240 YouTube.

01:09:46.580 It's been a

01:09:47.480 pleasure.

01:09:51.320 I'm just looking

01:09:52.300 to see if there

01:09:52.860 are any comments

01:09:53.400 on here before I

01:09:54.400 say goodbye.

01:09:56.260 Anything I need

01:09:56.880 to address?

01:09:59.940 It's an

01:10:00.700 unsurrection,

01:10:02.020 okay?

01:10:02.260 All right.

01:10:06.080 Thanks for

01:10:06.720 joining everybody

01:10:07.760 here and I will

01:10:09.420 see you tomorrow.

01:10:10.220 Same place,

01:10:10.920 same time.

01:10:11.480 Bye-bye.

01:10:12.440 Bye-bye.

01:10:41.120 .

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 08, 2024

Episode 2347 CWSA 01⧸08⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript