Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2348 CWSA 01⧸09⧸24 My Prediction For The 2024 Election. You Won't Like It

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:15.120 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm pretty sure there's never been a better time

00:00:19.340 in the history of the world.

00:00:20.860 But if you'd like this experience to go up to levels that nobody can even understand

00:00:25.080 with their tiny human brains, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:28.980 a tanker, chalice, and a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:33.660 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:35.460 I like coffee.

00:00:36.880 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine, the other day,

00:00:41.060 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:43.100 It's called, that's right, the simultaneous sip.

00:00:46.440 Savor it.

00:00:51.200 Ah, delightful.

00:00:53.200 Well, let me talk about some of the technology news, and then we'll get to my prediction

00:01:00.940 for the first time.

00:01:03.100 This will be my first prediction for the 2024 election.

00:01:08.540 You're not going to like it.

00:01:11.880 You're not going to like it at all, but you will experience it.

00:01:16.900 Well, Apple has introduced its glasses.

00:01:21.680 I think they're $3,500 February 2nd to come out, and I guess it's virtual reality glasses.

00:01:29.220 There's lots of talk about how they'll incorporate it in AI.

00:01:32.780 Now, there is a lot of uncertainty happening around Apple at the moment,

00:01:39.320 and I would ask you the following question.

00:01:41.320 I'd be interested in the comments, what you think.

00:01:44.320 Without knowing too much about this new product, the Apple goggle glasses thing,

00:01:51.620 do you think that Steve Jobs would have introduced this product without even seeing it?

00:01:57.620 Without even seeing it, do you think Steve Jobs would have introduced this product?

00:02:02.780 I don't know.

00:02:05.780 I feel like no.

00:02:08.760 I feel like no.

00:02:11.020 But how do you know, right?

00:02:14.880 So Apple has the following things going on.

00:02:17.300 They've got a virtual reality.

00:02:18.960 They're going into that hard.

00:02:20.740 They're introducing AI.

00:02:22.580 Apparently, their AI will be integrated into the function of the phone.

00:02:26.240 But their biggest risk, in my opinion, is the companies that are going to make a phone that is AI native.

00:02:36.940 I think what Apple is going to do, because it has to protect its existing base of business,

00:02:42.340 it has to integrate AI into something that looks like the same phone that they've always produced.

00:02:47.840 And I don't know if that's the best way to go.

00:02:51.500 I'd rather have a phone that has a blank screen.

00:02:55.080 And I just say, call Bob.

00:02:59.360 And it calls Bob.

00:03:00.780 I just want something I can talk to, and it does what I want it to do.

00:03:03.740 That's the phone I want.

00:03:05.540 And I think that's who Apple is going to be competing with.

00:03:08.260 I think they're going to compete with a phone where you just start working,

00:03:13.220 and the AI figures out what it is you want it to do.

00:03:16.880 So, for example, let's say you don't want to talk in public.

00:03:22.000 So you're not in a place you can talk to your phone.

00:03:24.500 So you want to send a message.

00:03:26.440 In the current model, you have to search around for your message app.

00:03:29.740 It's like, oh, am I using WhatsApp, or am I texting, or what am I doing?

00:03:35.060 But I think it would make more sense if you just had a blank screen,

00:03:38.740 and you just take out your phone, and you start typing a message.

00:03:42.160 And then as you type, three buttons appear.

00:03:46.760 You want to send it by WhatsApp or regular text message or something else.

00:03:51.620 And then after you're done with the message,

00:03:54.320 then you can pick which way to send it.

00:03:56.400 But the way you do it now is that you're thinking about the message you want to compose,

00:04:01.500 but you have to first work through the interface to find the app and open it and stuff.

00:04:05.680 That's terrible mental cost.

00:04:08.980 You want to do work first, and then at the end,

00:04:13.620 poke the app that's going to execute it.

00:04:16.260 That's how you should do it.

00:04:17.080 If you start putting some numbers on the page, it should turn into a spreadsheet.

00:04:24.160 It should just automatically turn into a spreadsheet because you're doing numbers.

00:04:28.940 That sort of thing.

00:04:30.520 So I think Apple has gigantic potential risks, but also gigantic upside.

00:04:38.200 So I sold my Apple stock because I didn't want a company with gigantic upside and gigantic downside.

00:04:47.480 I already hold it.

00:04:49.100 I have index funds, so I've got Apple exposure anyway.

00:04:52.520 But I no longer want to have exposure in the company itself specifically

00:04:57.480 because the reason I held the stock individually was because they were a monopoly.

00:05:04.920 And I liked putting my money in a monopoly because nobody was going to knock them out of business.

00:05:11.960 But with VR and AI and all that, I would say they're no longer a monopoly.

00:05:18.000 So you don't know what you're getting.

00:05:19.240 It could be the best investment of all time because it could double and triple because of all the new stuff or something else.

00:05:28.940 All right.

00:05:29.100 Samsung introduced a robot that looks like a little ball that rolls around on the floor.

00:05:34.440 And it's got a cool feature.

00:05:35.980 It has a projector.

00:05:37.740 So you can tell it to project on the wall or it can project on the floor so it can give you a message like hello or something.

00:05:44.860 And it can do stuff like control your household appliances and feed the dog and stuff like that. 0.95

00:05:51.780 It doesn't have any arms.

00:05:53.560 So it has no arms.

00:05:54.780 It just rolls around and it looks at things and it projects things and it can communicate with things.

00:06:01.600 But it looks pretty cool.

00:06:03.440 I wouldn't get one, especially because there's a Tesla robot coming.

00:06:07.760 And the Tesla robot, in addition to a human form factor, they're working on a Tesla dog robot.

00:06:16.760 And that doesn't mean they'll produce one, but apparently they're playing with a dog model.

00:06:21.340 How much would you want a Tesla dog robot?

00:06:26.860 If I didn't have a human Tesla robot, I plan to have a robot soon.

00:06:33.440 I plan to be an early adopter of the robot technology.

00:06:36.640 I feel like I might start with a dog.

00:06:40.380 You know, the dog isn't going to be able to empty my dishwasher.

00:06:43.420 I want that to.

00:06:44.620 Probably can't iron my shirts.

00:06:47.600 As if I iron shirts.

00:06:51.880 I said that like I've ironed a shirt anytime in the last 10 years.

00:06:57.200 Have I ironed a shirt in 10 years?

00:06:59.780 Yeah, I have when I travel.

00:07:01.820 I guess maybe within 10 years I've ironed a shirt, but in a hotel.

00:07:05.620 Not at home.

00:07:08.860 So yeah, I want my Tesla robot dog.

00:07:11.040 That would be so cool I can't even stand it.

00:07:13.540 Give me that now.

00:07:15.440 President Biden is a post on social media that Americans in 30 states are now paying under $3 a gallon to fill up their tanks.

00:07:24.140 Quick survey.

00:07:24.880 So three out of five of you, well, we don't know which states it is.

00:07:31.460 But let's say if it were just by states, three out of five of you would say your gas prices are under $3.

00:07:38.980 Go.

00:07:39.680 Are your gas prices where you live under $3?

00:07:42.940 Go.

00:07:43.160 Yes, yes, yes.

00:07:45.100 No, no, no.

00:07:46.420 No, no, no.

00:07:47.160 Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

00:07:48.260 No, no, no, no.

00:07:49.260 Lots of yeses, lots of noes.

00:07:51.340 I'm pretty sure my gas price is still over $5.

00:07:56.060 In California. 1.00

00:07:57.220 Because the California bullshit they put on top of it. 1.00

00:08:00.500 Plus, we don't have any refineries locally, plus all that. 0.99

00:08:05.340 I am so jealous of your $3 gas.

00:08:08.640 If I had $3 gas, I would feel like everything was okay.

00:08:16.140 I think I could get over almost everything else with my gas.

00:08:21.320 $2.65.

00:08:22.300 That's amazing.

00:08:23.520 Colorado, $2.70.

00:08:25.580 All right.

00:08:27.380 Well, so do we give Biden credit for this or what?

00:08:31.040 You tell me.

00:08:33.560 If your preferred president were president, will you give that president credit?

00:08:39.760 I don't know anything that Biden did.

00:08:43.380 At one point, he used the National Reserves, but that benefit presumably has already worked

00:08:51.000 through the system and no longer is affecting places, I think.

00:08:55.260 So what is it that Biden did exactly?

00:08:57.560 Is he claiming credit for not clamping down on drilling as much as he promised he would?

00:09:05.200 Is that the basis of his success?

00:09:07.540 That he didn't do the policies he promised?

00:09:09.660 It sounds like it.

00:09:12.920 Wasn't he said directly, I'm going to shut down the fossil fuel industry.

00:09:18.940 Did I imagine that?

00:09:20.700 I mean, in the long run, not in the short run.

00:09:22.480 But is this too far?

00:09:29.440 Am I saying something that's crazy?

00:09:31.480 That the reason he's claiming success is that he did not institute the policies he promised,

00:09:38.260 which would have put more pressure on gas prices, not less.

00:09:41.320 It feels like that.

00:09:44.140 I don't know.

00:09:44.520 I need a fact check on that.

00:09:45.740 But it feels like he's doing less than he said he would do is why we had success.

00:09:51.700 Maybe he could just keep doing less.

00:09:54.100 Things would be great.

00:09:55.840 That would just be great.

00:09:59.680 All right.

00:10:04.100 It's $6.35 a gallon in Europe.

00:10:07.520 Is that euros?

00:10:08.040 Yes.

00:10:11.320 All right.

00:10:13.840 Wall Street Journal is reporting that ESG is a dirty word now.

00:10:18.440 By the way, that's not my interpretation of their article.

00:10:21.720 That's actually the title.

00:10:23.260 The title of the article is that ESG is a dirty word.

00:10:27.800 Have we done our job well?

00:10:29.640 I think we have.

00:10:31.280 I think we've done our job.

00:10:33.220 Now, I don't think it's going away.

00:10:34.940 A lot of it is just a change in the names of it.

00:10:37.140 Some of them are changing their framing of it to more of the environmental part.

00:10:42.360 They're going to focus on the E, not the G so much, the governance part.

00:10:47.820 But I think this is a good sign that businesses are embarrassed to be in the ESG business.

00:10:53.820 As you know, BlackRock was pushing it, and then they backed off from it, at least the words.

00:10:58.720 So, what do you make of the fact that it's embarrassing, it's actually embarrassing, to admit to your shareholders that you're involved in ESG, that it's all downside.

00:11:12.480 And, by the way, you know, I don't have the big problem that companies would try to be better corporate citizens, but the ESG stuff's crazy.

00:11:25.320 University of Michigan has DEI employees.

00:11:30.120 Take a guess if you didn't see the story.

00:11:33.340 How many DEI employees do you need to staff your college DEI department?

00:11:39.700 Just take a guess in the comments.

00:11:41.520 How many do you think would be a full compliment?

00:11:46.180 If you guessed hundreds, you would be right.

00:11:53.120 They have 241 employees who do nothing but DEI.

00:12:01.460 241 people at one college.

00:12:04.600 One college.

00:12:05.240 Now, what does that say to you about the value of that college degree?

00:12:13.300 Who would want a degree from that college? 0.80

00:12:16.120 They obviously are completely incompetent and out of control and poorly managed. 0.98

00:12:21.460 My God.

00:12:22.200 So, if you want to put this in context, as Steve McGuire did in a post on X, they're spending $23 million a year for salaries.

00:12:32.220 And then you have the benefits.

00:12:33.660 It's like $30 million a year for the staff.

00:12:36.480 For $30 million, they can cover in-state tuition and fees for about 1,800 undergraduate students.

00:12:43.580 About 1,800 students could go to school for free if they would get rid of the DEI department and use that money.

00:12:51.280 So, I love that DEI is just, and yes, you're just now disgraced concepts.

00:13:00.740 Probably not in the bluest of blue places, but in most of the ordinary world.

00:13:05.020 Well, Biden said in a post, for too long, our tax code has rewarded wealth, not work, increasing income and wealth inequality in America.

00:13:17.120 And he says, working Americans pay their taxes.

00:13:21.120 All right.

00:13:21.740 So, what do you think about this fair share of business?

00:13:28.880 You know, I said this before. 0.99

00:13:31.720 One of the reasons that the word fair was invented was so that idiots and children had some way to participate in conversations. 0.99

00:13:44.480 Because you know what is fair? 1.00

00:13:46.940 Nothing.

00:13:48.100 There's nothing fair.

00:13:50.200 Nothing in this world is fair.

00:13:52.800 It can't be.

00:13:54.340 I mean, it's just a logical impossibility.

00:13:56.920 And the reason is that fair is subjective.

00:13:59.080 Have you ever seen the situation where everybody was happy and they said, well, that looks fair to me?

00:14:04.500 No.

00:14:05.320 You've only seen situations where some people say that looks fair to me and other people say that looks unfair to me.

00:14:12.400 And there's no objective standard to decide what is fair.

00:14:16.420 So, fairness, whenever you see it employed, is pure propaganda.

00:14:21.880 There's no rational, logical basis to it whatsoever.

00:14:25.080 There's no standard to compare it to.

00:14:26.960 As soon as you hear the word fair, don't participate in the conversation.

00:14:33.160 Because you're not talking to a legitimate, honest broker of conversation.

00:14:38.920 You're talking to somebody who's trying to bamboozle you, basically.

00:14:41.960 So, fairness is a word of bamboozlers and con artists. 1.00

00:14:46.700 Or children and idiots. 1.00

00:14:49.000 Right? 1.00

00:14:49.140 So, if you're not a child and you're not an idiot and you're using that word, it's because you're talking to children or idiots. 1.00

00:15:00.080 Because there is no smart person anywhere who believes that fairness is some kind of a standard you could actually employ. 1.00

00:15:08.640 Nobody believes that.

00:15:10.640 All right.

00:15:10.960 Nobody's smart.

00:15:11.580 All right.

00:15:13.040 Remember I told you that you don't really know a story until you know the players and who they're married to and how they make their money and all that stuff.

00:15:22.420 Just what they say doesn't tell you much.

00:15:25.540 But if you know who they are plus what they say, that might tell you something.

00:15:30.360 Here's an example.

00:15:31.000 You know, you all know the story of General Austin, Secretary of Defense, and he disappeared into the hospital without getting the message out to his bosses.

00:15:44.180 There might have been a mix-up there.

00:15:46.780 But whatever the problem was, he was off the grid and maybe not even conscious he was in the hospital without people knowing he was missing at a time when the country is at great military peril.

00:15:58.340 So I think it was CNN, maybe MSNBC, it doesn't matter.

00:16:04.300 But one of them had John Brennan on to talk about this.

00:16:08.380 Now, what do you know when you hear that John Brennan was asked to be a guest and he talked about this problem?

00:16:18.000 What do you know?

00:16:19.820 All right.

00:16:20.160 John Brennan is who you invite on the news when you have the following situation that you want to accomplish.

00:16:28.340 What you want to accomplish is there's a news cycle that's working against you, and that means Democrats.

00:16:35.500 So the news is unfriendly to Democrats.

00:16:38.280 And everybody believes they understand the story.

00:16:41.100 Oh, I understand this story, and it's bad for Democrats.

00:16:44.280 In that case, you need somebody to come in and introduce a new narrative that will give you at least some question about whether the obvious explanation is the true one.

00:16:56.540 For example, Hunter's laptop.

00:16:59.540 The obvious explanation was it's actually his laptop.

00:17:03.520 That's the obvious explanation.

00:17:04.620 So John Brennan comes on and says, oh, I don't know.

00:17:08.680 A lot of intel people talk to everybody, and they think it looks like Russian disinformation.

00:17:14.540 So here he took a story that's bad for Democrats, and it was pretty obvious what the situation was.

00:17:21.360 It was Hunter's laptop.

00:17:23.340 But he introduced a new narrative that might be Russian disinformation.

00:17:28.820 So now you've got this embarrassing story about the Secretary of Defense, which would suggest that Biden's White House is completely unmanaged.

00:17:37.460 Because if you're not managing military command during days like this, you're not really managing anything.

00:17:45.080 So there's a story that's bad for Democrats.

00:17:48.360 The Secretary of Defense was unavailable and nobody knew.

00:17:50.860 So they bring on John Brennan, and he introduces a new narrative.

00:17:57.520 And the new narrative is, well, he just said it sort of as a toss-off.

00:18:01.560 He goes, well, we're not sure if his medical condition is a reason for his poor judgment and why he didn't inform people.

00:18:10.040 That's pretty good.

00:18:12.320 That's pretty good.

00:18:13.560 Because I couldn't think of a good reason for why we would be seeing this news and why he wouldn't tell people.

00:18:20.360 Or maybe he did, but he told somebody who had a cold.

00:18:24.500 I don't know.

00:18:25.340 He told somebody who had COVID or something, and it didn't get through.

00:18:28.400 So whatever the story is, it still looks incompetent, no matter what the details are.

00:18:33.840 It looks like incompetence.

00:18:35.540 But you introduce this new narrative.

00:18:37.540 It's like, well, you knew he was in the hospital, and he couldn't function.

00:18:41.800 So if he's in the hospital and he can't function, and then he does something that sounds like somebody who couldn't function, it all makes sense.

00:18:51.960 And it's not so bad.

00:18:53.460 It would be a bad situation.

00:18:55.420 You say, oh, it was medical.

00:18:57.220 So you give it a different vibe to it.

00:19:02.780 So my only point about this, I'm not really too interested in the General Austin story, but the fact that they bring John Brennan on to introduce it to a new narrative, you understand that's pure propaganda, right?

00:19:16.140 That's not news.

00:19:18.180 That is pure propaganda.

00:19:20.060 All right.

00:19:22.920 And also, you can't get other people to say it who would have credibility.

00:19:27.180 So they needed somebody with a high level of credibility to introduce a new thought.

00:19:33.340 It was the perfect one.

00:19:35.680 All right.

00:19:36.080 There's Axiosus reporting.

00:19:39.600 Now, again, put this in the context of an election year.

00:19:45.120 Does it surprise you to hear that as we launch the election year, that Axios is reporting, oh, the biggest surprise story you could ever have in an election year, that 2023 was the hottest year in 125,000 years.

00:20:04.760 Now, could you have predicted that the news would tell you, and Axios in particular, would tell you that it was the hottest year last year?

00:20:17.120 I could have predicted that without any science at all, because it's bad for Republicans and good for Democrats.

00:20:24.340 That's it.

00:20:25.260 That's all you have to know in order to measure the earth.

00:20:29.000 Would you like to see me measure the temperature of the earth again?

00:20:32.880 Watch.

00:20:34.760 It's an election year.

00:20:38.500 Warming of the earth to new records would be terrible for Republicans, good for Democrats. 0.96

00:20:44.840 Concentrate.

00:20:45.640 Yes.

00:20:45.960 Oh, I see the temperatures now.

00:20:47.780 Yes.

00:20:48.320 Yes.

00:20:48.860 They're up half a degree.

00:20:52.060 That's how you measure the temperature in an election year.

00:20:55.520 Now, do I have to go through the details to convince you that we can't measure the temperature over 125,000 years? 0.96

00:21:04.760 Does anybody need even five seconds of why nobody in the fucking world can measure the temperature of the earth to within a degree or two over 125 fucking thousand years? 0.80

00:21:18.140 Because, you know, I could give you the conversation about why you can't measure it today. 0.98

00:21:25.080 Do you think you can measure it today within a degree or so and then measure it over time?

00:21:30.660 It is absurd to imagine that that's a capability that humans have.

00:21:37.320 The earth is a pretty big place.

00:21:38.740 And the problem is that even if you have lots of thermometers, things can happen to the thermometer.

00:21:46.800 But also, the earth does not have a uniform kind of common temperature.

00:21:52.140 Rather, it has hot pockets that can stay hot for a long time, cool pockets, and sometimes those change around.

00:21:59.600 Sometimes your hot pocket becomes cooler and vice versa.

00:22:04.040 But if you don't have a thermometer probably, you know, every square mile or so over the entire earth, including the oceans, you're not really measuring anything.

00:22:15.060 You might be able to measure the measurements you have changing over time.

00:22:21.240 But there might be other reasons for that change.

00:22:23.960 Could be where they are, what happens since they were put in, could be that the heat sink is going somewhere it didn't used to go.

00:22:32.120 A lot of possibilities.

00:22:33.440 But no, you cannot measure the temperature of the earth accurately.

00:22:39.620 Someday that will just seem funny.

00:22:42.340 You know, a hundred years from now, there will be history courses where they laugh because they thought that they could measure the temperature of the earth with some thermometers and some satellite images.

00:22:52.960 There were satellite measurements.

00:22:55.520 Nope.

00:22:56.320 Can't do it.

00:22:58.500 At least not that level.

00:23:01.240 And then other people pointed out that the ice levels are the highest they've ever been.

00:23:05.540 Do you believe that's true?

00:23:07.500 There's a claim that our ice levels are the highest they've ever been.

00:23:13.320 Do you think we can measure accurately how much ice there is?

00:23:19.200 Right.

00:23:19.820 So this might be on the side that you agree with.

00:23:22.300 So if you agree with the people who are not worried about climate, you might agree with the people who say that the amount of ice is increasing instead of decreasing.

00:23:32.640 Do you think we can measure the amount of ice?

00:23:36.800 Seriously.

00:23:37.900 Do you really think we can measure the amount of ice?

00:23:40.940 No.

00:23:42.040 And you know we can't because you've been watching them try for years.

00:23:46.440 And you'll see a story that says, oh, we measured this ice and it's, you know, it's down by two feet.

00:23:52.280 And you wait a week and there'll be somebody else says, oh, we measured the ice and we made a big mistake.

00:23:57.020 Yes, it was decreasing here, but it was increasing over here and we didn't catch that.

00:24:00.920 You've been watching this for years. 0.99

00:24:02.400 No, they cannot accurately measure any fucking ice, just like they can't accurately measure the fucking temperature. 0.99

00:24:09.600 Stop pretending these things can be measured to some degree where you can really see the change. 0.99

00:24:15.740 No, those are real things.

00:24:18.220 So don't believe the skeptics, but don't believe the science on this.

00:24:22.740 They can't measure this stuff.

00:24:23.800 All right.

00:24:29.200 A few years ago, I made a bet on a betting platform.

00:24:35.400 And the bet was, I think it was predicted or something.

00:24:38.160 I bet, I never told you this, by the way.

00:24:40.960 I bet that it would be reported to be the highest temperature that year of any year.

00:24:46.380 Now, the reason I bet that is not because I know anything about science.

00:24:49.760 I just figured every year they're going to say it's the hottest year.

00:24:52.680 To me, it seemed like a no-brainer.

00:24:55.680 I'll just put in some money on the fact that they're going to say again, it's the hottest year.

00:25:01.820 But you know what I got wrong?

00:25:03.900 I made that bet on a non-election year, and it wasn't.

00:25:07.920 It wasn't the hottest year.

00:25:10.660 If I had had even the smallest bit of brain working,

00:25:16.220 I would have bet, maybe a week or two ago or whatever,

00:25:21.260 that 2023 would be recorded as the hottest year on record.

00:25:25.560 Do you think that would have been a smart bet? 1.00

00:25:27.940 Fuck yes. 0.99

00:25:29.280 The odds that they would have said that 2023 was not the hottest record, 1.00

00:25:34.000 hottest on record, in an election year, was fucking zero. 0.98

00:25:39.540 There was zero fucking chance they were going to say it wasn't a record, 0.99

00:25:43.060 no matter what the actual measurement is. 0.98

00:25:46.220 I'm so mad at myself.

00:25:48.700 This is like a bet that wasn't a bet.

00:25:51.420 The first time it was kind of a bet, but in an election year, it's not even a bet.

00:25:57.320 It's just basically it's dialed in.

00:25:59.500 I could have just collected my money if I just waited. 1.00

00:26:03.540 I'm an idiot. 1.00

00:26:05.560 Next time. 1.00

00:26:06.580 I'll get it next time.

00:26:08.420 All right.

00:26:08.740 Can you become president of the United States if none of the citizens you've ever met,

00:26:16.960 let's say as a voter, can you become president of the United States

00:26:21.380 if the voters have never met anybody who supports you and voted for you?

00:26:26.240 Well, we might find out because there's a poll out of New Hampshire, interactive polls.

00:26:33.500 I don't know how scientific it was.

00:26:35.380 It shows Trump at 39% in the primary and Haley.

00:26:39.180 Hickey Haley at 32%.

00:26:40.760 And Christie at 12%.

00:26:42.240 Do you really think in the real world that Haley has 32% support in New Hampshire?

00:26:52.120 I still don't know anybody in person who supports Nicky Haley.

00:26:57.200 I do know a person or two on live that I haven't seen in person, but they seem like real people.

00:27:05.100 So I think they exist.

00:27:08.100 But in your wildest imagination, do you really think Haley is at 32% in New Hampshire?

00:27:15.220 Does that sound possible?

00:27:18.720 Do you think it's women? 1.00

00:27:20.940 I don't know.

00:27:22.540 I don't know.

00:27:23.860 So I'm not believing any of those polls.

00:27:26.600 But could we have a president where you don't know of anybody who voted for that person?

00:27:31.320 I think we're at that place.

00:27:32.820 We could.

00:27:33.180 But I think, you know, I'm not predicting this will happen.

00:27:38.460 But I think we're at a place where you could actually have a president and you would never meet anybody in your whole life who voted for them.

00:27:47.080 That could actually happen.

00:27:48.960 We're at a point of brainwashing and gaslighting that could literally happen.

00:27:54.640 A president that you don't know anybody who ever voted for.

00:27:58.360 And they could serve out eight years.

00:28:00.180 That's actually something that can happen in our current environment.

00:28:05.900 It couldn't have always happened.

00:28:07.740 But at the moment, we're so primed for literally anything from UFOs to you name it.

00:28:12.880 Yeah, they could do that.

00:28:15.340 Trump is doing his usual provocations that get taken out of context.

00:28:19.660 So here he's being quoted as saying that he hopes the economy crashes in the next 12 months because, quote, I don't want to be Herbert Hoover.

00:28:30.220 Now, Herbert Hoover was president when the economy crashed.

00:28:34.740 So he was always famous as our worst president for economics, although there's a dispute whether he was really that bad.

00:28:43.480 You know, some say not so bad.

00:28:45.620 But what Trump was saying was he would hate to be the president when the economy crashes.

00:28:53.300 So when he says he hopes the economy crashes in the next 12 months, it was so that he wouldn't be president when it happened.

00:29:01.620 Now, how seriously should you take that?

00:29:04.740 He's the potential next president.

00:29:09.340 And he said he hopes the economy crashes in the next 12 months because I don't want to be Herbert Hoover.

00:29:16.480 Seriously.

00:29:17.620 How seriously should you take that?

00:29:21.860 That's just Trump being Trump.

00:29:24.020 He's just saying he doesn't want to be in a situation where he has bad luck and he gets blamed for destroying the economy.

00:29:30.420 So if it's going to tank, he wants it to tank before he gets there.

00:29:34.740 So that he can be the one who recovers it.

00:29:37.120 Now, how seriously should you take that?

00:29:39.060 Come on.

00:29:40.220 That's like a big headline today.

00:29:42.400 Nobody should take that seriously.

00:29:44.720 Literally nobody should believe that in the actual world, Trump prefers that the economy tanks at all.

00:29:55.340 Like, who believes that he wants it to tank?

00:29:58.980 Nobody.

00:30:00.520 He doesn't want it to tank.

00:30:02.160 I think my interpretation is if it's going to tank on its own, what's best for him is it happens fast.

00:30:09.380 So then he can be the one to fix it.

00:30:11.520 It's not exactly the worst thing in the world to say.

00:30:14.620 It's just a very Trump-like way to put it.

00:30:17.520 Like, once you get used to him, you can just hear this and go, okay, I know what you're saying.

00:30:21.520 But what he's saying is he doesn't want to have bad luck.

00:30:24.620 That's all.

00:30:25.700 But he also thinks he can fix the economy if it can.

00:30:28.780 I have no problem with that at all.

00:30:32.200 But it's the election year, so everything he says will be taken out of context.

00:30:36.740 How many of you are watching the ongoing social media battle between Elon Musk and Mark Cuban?

00:30:43.040 Because it just keeps getting better.

00:30:44.540 It's the best dollar value for entertainment that I've seen in the longest time.

00:30:52.460 So I'll give you a little update on that.

00:30:54.860 So Mark Cuban is pro-DEI.

00:30:58.480 And, you know, he's got some complaints about Musk.

00:31:01.820 And Musk has some complaints about Cuban.

00:31:04.740 They've made some accusations back and forth.

00:31:06.440 But Elon Musk posts a video of Mark Cuban in some event.

00:31:12.220 He's on stage.

00:31:13.760 And it's out of context, of course.

00:31:15.820 But Cuban is saying that he is prejudiced and bigoted.

00:31:22.620 And that, for example, if you were walking down the street at night and you saw a black teenager in a hoodie, 0.96

00:31:30.660 he would cross the street to get away from the black teenager in the hoodie. 0.87

00:31:33.900 So Musk posts that and he goes, 0.97

00:31:39.580 this explains Mark Cuban's ridiculous overcompensation regarding racism.

00:31:44.520 Same thing happened with Me Too. 0.96

00:31:46.340 Guys who got busted suddenly became fake ardent feminists.

00:31:52.600 Yeah.

00:31:53.480 Now, remember.

00:31:55.660 Oh, shoot.

00:31:58.980 Remember.

00:31:59.540 Remember.

00:32:03.900 Sorry, I had to fix my screen.

00:32:09.040 It keeps going, turning off here.

00:32:13.700 So remember, they're after each other a little bit.

00:32:16.500 So don't take much of it too seriously.

00:32:19.460 Later, Musk said he posted Mark Cuban is a racist.

00:32:24.420 Okay. 0.99

00:32:25.060 He also posted that he's a liar. 0.98

00:32:28.420 Separately. 0.99

00:32:28.980 So he's called him a liar, an overcompensator, a racist. 0.87

00:32:35.200 And the racist comment was because Cuban said recently that a private school, 0.74

00:32:40.560 if they wanted to have only one kind of person at the school, it's their choice because it's a private school,

00:32:45.860 to which Musk says that's racist.

00:32:48.760 Which it is, right?

00:32:49.800 If you had a private school and you said, I'm only going to allow a specific race, it doesn't need to be government to be racist, does it?

00:33:00.960 Doesn't that count as racist?

00:33:03.340 But I think I would back Elon Musk on that.

00:33:06.940 So I don't know that their conversation is particularly important, but it sure is fun.

00:33:14.640 And it got more fun when somebody surfaced a Trump post from 2014.

00:33:22.020 I don't remember this news.

00:33:23.860 But apparently back then, Mark Cuban tried to buy a baseball team.

00:33:27.280 And, oh, no, he tried to buy an NBA team, and he was rejected.

00:33:35.200 And, no, he was trying to buy a baseball team, not an NBA team.

00:33:38.720 And apparently Trump sent him a message that said, I'm truly sorry.

00:33:48.040 I'm mixing up two different stories. 0.99

00:33:50.020 One of them is that Trump called Cuban an asshole in 2014. 0.99

00:33:58.420 So Trump doesn't like Mark Cuban. 0.99

00:34:00.740 I didn't know.

00:34:01.840 Do you remember when Mark Cuban was very pro or anti-Trump?

00:34:07.280 And you wondered what was up with that?

00:34:10.420 And it looked kind of personal?

00:34:12.580 Well, apparently it was really personal.

00:34:13.960 So a lot of what looked like politics was, you know, two billionaires who had had some past.

00:34:20.540 So once you see the history, you understand why you're so anti-Trump.

00:34:25.340 But also, it gets worse.

00:34:27.660 I guess Mark Cuban tried to do a TV show called The Benefactor, and it didn't work out.

00:34:32.760 And Trump sent him a letter.

00:34:37.280 I'm going to leave a typed and signed letter from Trump when Cuban's TV show failed.

00:34:46.560 And this is what Trump said.

00:34:51.400 I'm truly sorry to hear that your show has been canceled for lack of ratings.

00:34:55.560 When I called to congratulate you on The Benefactor, little did you or I realize how disastrous

00:35:01.060 and embarrassing it would turn out to be for you.

00:35:03.900 And then Trump says, if you ever decide to do another show, please call me and I will be

00:35:13.780 happy to lend a helping hand.

00:35:15.660 And then here's the best part.

00:35:18.900 The best part is that he signs his letter, sincerely, Donald Trump.

00:35:24.520 He signed that letter, sincerely.

00:35:30.800 Sincerely.

00:35:33.900 Now, apparently, he's been hilarious for years, you know, before it came to my attention.

00:35:39.440 I didn't realize he was such a troll before he ran for president. 0.85

00:35:43.660 But he's been battling people like crazy. 0.88

00:35:47.600 There's also a story that Jesse Waters is talking about this and others.

00:35:52.300 So this Fannie, Fannie Willis, who's a DA for Fulton County, going after Trump for the Georgia stuff.

00:36:04.620 Apparently, the prosecutor that she hired to put on the case is her lover.

00:36:10.060 She hired her lover to be the, what they say, overpaid and highly underqualified. 0.88

00:36:16.460 Hasn't done much of this work.

00:36:17.800 So he's underqualified, overpaid, and her lover.

00:36:21.560 And apparently, this is known.

00:36:23.920 And then related to the story, and nobody's denying the accusations.

00:36:29.460 And then related to the story is a, separately, that the prosecutor, who was her lover, I guess,

00:36:35.300 visited with the White House before making their play.

00:36:42.340 So the thinking is that the White House may have been coordinating the local DA actions,

00:36:48.300 which would be highly inappropriate and RICO-like.

00:36:52.340 And it would look like a coordinated illegal behavior.

00:36:56.740 So who knows if anything will come of that.

00:36:59.140 But it looks pretty super sketchy to me.

00:37:01.280 Let me ask you this.

00:37:03.200 Do you think there's any chance that the local DAs did not coordinate with the White House?

00:37:09.160 Or at least operatives from the White House?

00:37:12.080 I would say that's in the category of obvious.

00:37:15.560 Like, I wouldn't need a news story to know that the federal-type people are involved in talking to them

00:37:22.620 and, you know, giving them encouragement.

00:37:25.040 Do you think somebody like Fannie Willis has already been promised some big role in future politics

00:37:32.880 if she takes Trump down?

00:37:37.760 I would guess yes, whether it's stated, obviously, or implied.

00:37:44.780 I would think she's just doing it for career reasons, for career development.

00:37:50.900 But she and her boyfriend seem to be making, at least he's making a lot of money.

00:37:54.500 All right.

00:37:57.340 So here's an update on the, you know, the case of the fake electors.

00:38:03.620 The so-called fake electors that Trump and his staff allegedly tried to pull together

00:38:09.300 so that they could take over the country with their fake electors instead of using the real ones.

00:38:15.240 So that's the story we've been told, that they had these alternative electors.

00:38:19.880 It was illegal because that's not the way the process works.

00:38:22.960 So it turns out none of that was true. 0.99

00:38:27.380 That whole fucking story was fake. 0.98

00:38:31.000 Here's the real story that's just coming out. 0.99

00:38:34.700 Actually, I don't know how recently this came out.

00:38:37.160 But it turns out that these so-called fake electors, there's documentation describing what they were up to.

00:38:51.340 So in writing, you know, contemporaneous, when it was happening, in writing, there's documentation that shows they were not intending to be fake substitute electors.

00:39:04.180 They very clearly said the only point of this is to have some people lined up to be replacements if the legal challenges succeed so that you can maintain your legal right to continue your challenge.

00:39:19.400 So apparently the whole point of having the alternative electors in writing and in words were not to be fake electors.

00:39:29.780 It was to preserve their legal rights to continue the procedural challenges.

00:39:35.020 So the entire basis of the claim is known to be debunked on documents that very clearly say the intention of this is just to keep our rights open, not to take over the country.

00:39:49.120 Isn't that freaking amazing that that that kind of news is just sort of bubbling up now?

00:39:57.540 I think it's been known for a while, but it wasn't known to be.

00:40:01.600 Now, they use a different word.

00:40:04.140 Yeah, there are different words like, you know, provisional and whatever.

00:40:08.020 But they very clearly stated these are not trying to be fake electors.

00:40:12.580 These are like alternative, provisional, just keeping our options open kind of thing.

00:40:19.120 But it is a lie, says somebody.

00:40:21.840 Well, it's in writing.

00:40:23.920 All right.

00:40:25.680 You all heard about that door that flew off a plane.

00:40:30.640 And I guess United Airlines has found at least five of those kinds of doors with loose bolts.

00:40:36.560 Those are on Boeing 737 MAX planes.

00:40:40.740 And I heard the story last night about, you know how the door blew off,

00:40:47.340 but then the seat that was closest to the door, just by big coincidence, was empty.

00:40:55.540 Like, that's the biggest coincidence in the world, that that one seat was empty.

00:40:59.560 That person missed the flight.

00:41:02.860 Can you imagine that?

00:41:04.840 Can you imagine if you had been on that flight and the door next to you just flew off?

00:41:10.480 And you're basically, you're in the elements.

00:41:13.520 You're basically flying outdoors at 10,000 feet.

00:41:17.340 And the level of fear that that would give me would be, you know, just outrageous.

00:41:23.440 I would never fly again, for sure.

00:41:26.620 But, of course, all the buzz on social media is whether this is because of diversity hiring.

00:41:34.480 Let me ask you.

00:41:35.200 Do you think that this specific problem with these plug doors is because of diversity hiring?

00:41:45.800 All right.

00:41:46.540 Well, here's...

00:41:49.200 All right.

00:41:50.020 Anything's possible.

00:41:51.540 But I think it's completely unfair to take any specific case and say that this is because of diversity hiring.

00:41:58.120 I think if you had to bet, I would bet against it.

00:42:02.900 I would bet against it if I had to bet.

00:42:05.920 But maybe.

00:42:07.240 Here's what's a more fair way to talk about this topic.

00:42:12.180 I'm completely convinced that diversity hiring, in a general sense, over time, on average, lowers the competency of the workforce.

00:42:24.800 Now, that's based on anybody's ethnicity, not based on their gender or any of that.

00:42:31.760 It's based on just math, because there's a small pool of people that fit the diversity criteria.

00:42:39.120 There's not enough of them so that you could hire people of equal quality.

00:42:42.980 So you're going to have to go further and further down the quality level in order to get somebody, because there just aren't enough.

00:42:51.820 So it has nothing to do with your ethnicity or your genes.

00:42:54.300 It's just math.

00:42:55.700 We should see, all things being equal, we should see a decline in competency.

00:43:01.540 But I think it's terribly unfair to pick one business failure and say, oh, that one looks like it's diversity.

00:43:10.340 So don't get too far over your skis.

00:43:15.660 You know, you can easily find out that this had nothing to do with anything.

00:43:20.140 You know, maybe just bad luck.

00:43:22.700 But your general fear that we could be, you know, dying or in deep trouble because of our lack of confidence, that's real.

00:43:32.680 There's absolutely a very noticeable decline in capability of workers.

00:43:42.640 I've never seen less competent employees everywhere.

00:43:47.280 Just everywhere.

00:43:48.040 It's just massive incompetence everywhere.

00:43:50.960 I think we all see that.

00:43:52.900 There's a new chip.

00:43:54.520 You can put in a monkey that will change its behavior.

00:43:56.800 You can turn a little macaque monkey, you can make it lower its risk or increase its risk.

00:44:06.560 And so you could make a monkey have a gambling addiction by tweaking the chip one way, and you can tweak it the other way, and you can remove the addiction.

00:44:16.180 Now, they're already saying, of course, this may have application for people.

00:44:21.360 But I would be more worried that we're weaponizing monkeys because I don't want a monkey with a chip in its head.

00:44:30.480 I mean, that's, we're talking trouble.

00:44:35.340 Because if the monkeys start coordinating, I don't know.

00:44:39.940 I just don't like the idea of chips in the monkey's brain.

00:44:43.180 It just feels like that could go wrong.

00:44:44.840 Well, the Missouri Secretary of State has a clever thing to say.

00:44:52.180 So the Missouri Secretary of State is opposed to attempts by Colorado and Maine to remove Trump from the ballot.

00:45:00.940 Obviously, Missouri is a Republican kind of a state.

00:45:03.900 So if that happens, if Colorado and Maine take Trump off the ballot, the Missouri says they'll remove Biden from the Missouri ballot for giving aid to the invasion of our southern border.

00:45:17.120 To which I say, how in the world is that legal?

00:45:20.060 And then the second thing I say, oh, I actually don't care.

00:45:25.560 I don't care if it's legal.

00:45:26.900 I'm glad they would do it.

00:45:29.360 Because obviously, taking them off the Colorado and Maine ballots might be legal.

00:45:35.360 I doubt it.

00:45:36.680 It might be.

00:45:37.620 But it's so sketchy that if a Republican state did something that was just flat out illegal,

00:45:42.880 I would only care if they got away with it.

00:45:45.400 I mean, generally, I'm pretty much in favor of law and order.

00:45:50.900 But, you know, if you're trying to right a wrong, yes, two wrongs would make, well, two wrongs wouldn't make a right,

00:45:59.560 but one of the wrongs might compensate for the other wrong.

00:46:02.700 Wouldn't make a right, but it might get you to a better place.

00:46:06.060 So I'm fully, fully supportive of threatening to take Biden off the ballot.

00:46:14.700 And I think the invasion of the southern border is perfectly legitimate.

00:46:20.400 Because that would suggest treasonous behavior.

00:46:25.640 And if treasonous behavior, let's say insurrection in particular, is the reason for taking Trump off the ballot,

00:46:31.420 and it doesn't have to be proven in the court, so they don't require a court to say it's treason.

00:46:37.520 Just the judge can say, yeah, it looks treasonous, you know, in my opinion, without evidence.

00:46:44.040 So I'm going to say it is.

00:46:47.260 Sure, if that's the standard, then Missouri can do it too.

00:46:51.140 All right, let's talk about 2024.

00:46:53.120 I'm going to give you my prediction for the first time of the 2024 election outcome.

00:46:58.920 And I warn you, you're not going to like it.

00:47:02.600 You're not going to like it.

00:47:04.520 But let's look at Peter Zayn's prediction.

00:47:06.520 I just watched that a moment ago.

00:47:08.720 And he says Trump can't win.

00:47:11.280 And the reason is that Republicans can only win if they're really unified.

00:47:15.480 And he's driven too many wedges in the Republicans.

00:47:19.860 So, you know, unless they're super unified, they can't win because they have fewer voters than Democrats.

00:47:25.240 I feel like that's a complete lack of understanding of Republicans.

00:47:32.520 Doesn't this feel like something that was said in 2016?

00:47:37.100 Trump is too divisive.

00:47:38.800 The Republicans won't.

00:47:40.140 He'll never get the religious conservatives. 0.99

00:47:43.200 And then once it became a contest between Hillary and Trump, suddenly all the Republicans said, oh, crap. 0.99

00:47:52.800 And they lined up and they voted for Trump. 0.98

00:47:54.440 Why wouldn't that happen again?

00:47:56.580 I feel like it's just going to happen again.

00:47:58.980 Trump will be divisive.

00:48:01.940 The primaries will, you know, suss out all that divisiveness among Republicans.

00:48:06.520 But once they have their candidate, whether it's Trump or anybody else, they're all going to line up.

00:48:13.540 And I think the independents are not really independents.

00:48:16.580 You know, they're people who always go one way.

00:48:19.040 You know, they just call themselves independent.

00:48:21.120 So I don't agree with Peter Zayn's take on this at all.

00:48:25.940 I do agree that Trump has divided the Republican Party.

00:48:29.360 But that's only going to last until they get to the front door.

00:48:33.140 You know, as soon as they're walking through the election, you know, polling place, they're just Republicans.

00:48:39.700 That's my take.

00:48:41.160 Now, am I wrong?

00:48:42.980 Am I reading the room wrong?

00:48:45.200 Is Peter Zayn reading it right?

00:48:47.000 That the Republicans will sort of opt out or not vote because they're not vote Trump?

00:48:53.840 Enough of them.

00:48:56.760 Yeah.

00:48:57.240 If he chose Haley as a VP, that might be a problem. 0.90

00:49:02.800 But I'm going to disagree with Peter Zayn.

00:49:04.520 I think the Republicans will form up just the way they always do.

00:49:09.620 I don't think it'll be any different this time.

00:49:13.900 Rasmussen says that two-thirds of Democrats approve of keeping Trump off the ballot.

00:49:20.760 Two-thirds of Republicans approve of keeping Trump off the ballot.

00:49:27.240 And I'm pretty sure that most of them understand they're not doing it legally.

00:49:30.960 In other words, it's pretty obvious that the Supreme Court will reverse it.

00:49:36.180 So you can't really say that they're saying they agree with the law because they probably know that it's not going to pass legal muster eventually.

00:49:45.780 But still, two-thirds of Democrats are in favor of it.

00:49:50.340 Now, you know what's scary about this?

00:49:52.060 If you reverse the parties, the exact topic, you just changed Biden with Trump, 0.99

00:49:59.160 I'll bet two-thirds of Republicans would be in favor of keeping Biden off the ballot for similarly stupid reasons. 0.99

00:50:06.220 It's just people like to win. 0.99

00:50:09.200 I think people are just saying, well, what's it take to win?

00:50:12.600 All right, if that gets it done, it's so important, we'll do it.

00:50:18.520 But keep this in mind, how many Democrats are opposed to Trump even having a fair chance of running?

00:50:25.520 And where does that come from?

00:50:27.220 That doesn't come just from wanting their candidate to win.

00:50:30.620 That comes from being propagandized and brainwashed to thinking that Trump is literally a dictator.

00:50:38.040 And that, yeah, that he's Hillary.

00:50:39.600 And that, you know, there's an existential risk.

00:50:43.180 That's how you get two-thirds of the people say he can't be on the ballot, even if he is legally allowed.

00:50:52.980 Let me ask you this, though.

00:50:54.760 Among Republicans, what percent of Republicans think it's perfectly fine if he's taken off the ballot?

00:51:06.560 That's right, about a quarter.

00:51:11.200 73% disapprove of taking him off.

00:51:14.920 So 100 minus 73, you got your number.

00:51:18.820 Yep, it's always about a quarter of the people already.

00:51:20.740 And now I give you my prediction for 2024, the presidential election.

00:51:29.420 This will be the first time I've made this prediction.

00:51:32.300 My prediction is that when the votes are counted, we will not have a president.

00:51:39.220 Or we'll have two.

00:51:41.200 But we will not have a result.

00:51:43.680 And I don't mean that the result will be delayed.

00:51:45.920 I mean that the result will be thrown out.

00:51:50.000 And that the Supreme Court will order a do-over.

00:51:54.100 Whether it's the Supreme Court or we just decide to do it.

00:51:58.060 But my prediction is this.

00:52:00.800 That if you simply counted the votes, I think Trump would win.

00:52:05.520 But if you look at the number of people who would be willing to take him off the ballot, whether that's legal to do it or not, if you look at the framing of him as Hitler, etc., you've created a situation where the Democrats have to rig the election.

00:52:21.780 They don't have a choice.

00:52:24.000 I would.

00:52:24.460 If I were a Democrat and I'd been brainwashed to think I could stop Hitler, I would rig the election in a heartbeat. 0.92

00:52:33.640 For you.

00:52:34.780 I'd do it for you.

00:52:35.580 I wouldn't even do it for myself.

00:52:37.380 I would literally risk my life.

00:52:39.420 Literally.

00:52:40.660 I would risk my life to keep Hitler out of office. 0.93

00:52:45.360 And if I thought I could cheat, I had some chance of getting away with it.

00:52:49.720 Totally.

00:52:50.760 So there is a situation that guarantees Democrats have the incentive to cheat.

00:52:57.000 Now, do they have the ways?

00:52:58.840 Do they have a mechanism?

00:53:00.080 Is there any practical way Democrats could cheat?

00:53:03.380 Well, yes.

00:53:04.620 Yes, there is.

00:53:06.160 Now, is there a way to cheat massively and get away with it?

00:53:11.260 No.

00:53:13.140 That's the problem.

00:53:15.340 So the two things that would cause us to have an election with no president elected,

00:53:20.160 would be these two things that are both guaranteed.

00:53:24.560 With current information, they're guaranteed.

00:53:26.660 Anything could change.

00:53:28.160 We're guaranteed that Trump is a better candidate than Biden.

00:53:33.480 And that if it were, you know, sprayed up those two, and we don't know yet, because people

00:53:37.800 are, a lot of smart people say, including me, that Biden might not make it to the end zone.

00:53:42.520 But, suppose he does.

00:53:46.940 Or, there's another candidate who doesn't poll any better.

00:53:51.480 And let's say that the polling clearly says that Trump is going to win.

00:53:55.760 And then he goes ahead and doesn't win. 0.71

00:53:58.280 If you saw that the polling said he was clearly going to win, but the results were ridiculous,

00:54:06.300 and obviously rigged, I think that's where we're heading.

00:54:10.720 I think rigging is guaranteed because of the brainwashing and the priming up to this point.

00:54:17.380 It's guaranteed.

00:54:19.020 You can't not have rigging under our current situation.

00:54:22.280 Does everybody agree with that?

00:54:25.380 There is no reasonable way you could have a fair election when one side that's running

00:54:31.860 the election believes it's an existential threat to not just their own careers or lives or livelihood,

00:54:38.500 but to the planet.

00:54:40.340 Remember, they believe that the planet will be destroyed.

00:54:43.740 The planet.

00:54:45.100 By climate change and nuclear war or whatever, if Trump is elected.

00:54:49.280 They believe he will round people up and put them in prison camps.

00:54:55.240 Now, that's just citizens.

00:54:57.600 That's just what the citizens have been brainwashed into thinking.

00:55:00.840 Imagine what you would think if you were a leading Democrat,

00:55:04.880 and you knew that either you had done some sketchy things that the Republicans might catch you for

00:55:10.560 and jail you for, or you really did some sketchy things, and they're going to catch you.

00:55:16.740 So either they're going to accuse you of sketchy things, which is a big problem,

00:55:20.620 or you did sketchy things, and they're going to catch you, which is an even bigger problem.

00:55:25.480 So if you're a leader, given that all the things they're doing against Trump,

00:55:30.200 and Trump is saying directly, you elect me, and I'm going to get vengeance.

00:55:34.400 I'm going to get revenge.

00:55:36.040 He's clearly stated, whether he does it or not.

00:55:38.380 I'm not sure he would do it.

00:55:39.380 But he's clearly stated he's going to go to try to jail members of the Democratic Party.

00:55:46.800 Why?

00:55:47.700 Because they're trying to jail him.

00:55:50.000 So I think he's saying very clearly, if you're going to try to jail me, and you don't get me,

00:55:55.520 I'm going to jail you if I can.

00:55:58.340 Now, under those situations,

00:56:00.080 do you think the leading Democrats will cause a rigged vote?

00:56:05.620 Of course.

00:56:07.200 I would.

00:56:08.360 You put me in that situation where I think the incoming president might try to put me in jail, 1.00

00:56:14.000 I would rig that fucking vote every fucking day. 1.00

00:56:17.660 I'd be rigging it up and down. 1.00

00:56:19.620 Oh, I wouldn't.

00:56:20.500 And I had no hesitation whatsoever.

00:56:23.540 So here's the most likely thing, is that Trump would beat whoever he's running against.

00:56:31.180 But the election will go the other way.

00:56:33.480 And it will be so obviously rigged, like it'll be so anawak with what we expect,

00:56:39.240 that the Supreme Court is going to say, you've got to do this again.

00:56:43.580 You just have to do it again.

00:56:45.620 There's no way this can stand.

00:56:48.060 Now, others have pointed out that, well, you know, in 2020, they didn't redo the election.

00:56:52.820 They just decided to do one.

00:56:54.780 Not good enough this time.

00:56:56.860 Because if it really was just which votes do you count, you know, that's like a small question.

00:57:03.200 But if it's a, we think this entire thing was rigged, and by the way, we have proof.

00:57:08.460 If you have proof it was rigged,

00:57:10.640 I don't think the Supreme Court just gives it to the other person.

00:57:14.340 I think they're going to say, the only way to hold the country together is,

00:57:17.720 you've just got to do this again.

00:57:19.540 And you've got to look, you've got to watch it a little more carefully and just do it again.

00:57:22.820 So my prediction is, we will not pick a president in 2024,

00:57:28.840 because we have designed a system that guarantees we won't.

00:57:32.860 Remember?

00:57:33.620 Design is destiny.

00:57:35.460 We have now designed our current system to guarantee that it will be rigged,

00:57:41.860 and guarantee that we'll notice it,

00:57:44.460 and guarantee that we have to throw away the election.

00:57:46.700 I think it's guaranteed.

00:57:55.720 The Supreme Court does not settle if no electoral vote majority, right?

00:58:03.140 So, yeah, process-wise, if there's no electoral majority,

00:58:08.640 then it goes to the House, et cetera.

00:58:10.900 But I'm talking about in the situation where rigging is obvious, and it's shown.

00:58:17.600 In those situations, I can't believe it goes to the House.

00:58:21.160 I think the Supreme Court would insert itself,

00:58:25.340 and we'd probably want that to happen,

00:58:27.240 because I don't think you'd want a political...

00:58:28.660 I don't think you'd want a political solution to rigging.

00:58:32.460 I think you'd need a legal remedy to rigging,

00:58:35.680 because that's a crime.

00:58:36.860 If it were a political problem, then yes.

00:58:40.040 Take it to the House.

00:58:42.060 So that's my prediction.

00:58:43.700 My prediction is no result.

00:58:46.440 And do you think anybody else will make that prediction?

00:58:48.520 Do you think anybody else will make a result

00:58:53.580 that on the coin flip, it's going to land on the edge?

00:58:56.880 Because that's what I just did.

00:58:58.960 I just predicted that the coin flip is going to land on the edge and stay there.

00:59:04.060 Now, if I get this right,

00:59:06.420 would you acknowledge

00:59:07.500 that it's the most unlikely prediction of all time?

00:59:12.500 Because it's never happened.

00:59:14.280 It's never happened.

00:59:15.260 So for a coin flip to land on the edge

00:59:18.820 is like a real gutsy or crazy.

00:59:24.420 It might be just crazy.

00:59:25.520 Cool.

00:59:27.540 All right.

00:59:28.140 Let me tell you what's going to happen in Gaza and the West Bank.

00:59:31.440 So the U.S. wants a two-state solution.

00:59:36.420 The two states in this telling

00:59:38.640 would be a combined Gaza and West Bank.

00:59:42.860 So the United States doesn't want Gaza to be its own country anymore.

00:59:46.760 I'm sure Israel doesn't either.

00:59:49.040 So the thought is that you combine the Palestinians into one entity.

00:59:55.360 And then the U.S. is pushing that the Palestinians, 0.99

01:00:00.740 ideally somebody that can get along with Israel, 0.68

01:00:04.140 run their own shell

01:00:05.240 and that you move toward a solid two-state solution.

01:00:10.340 Now, that, of course, is crazy.

01:00:12.860 That could never happen.

01:00:13.820 So here's what could happen.

01:00:16.600 And by the way,

01:00:17.640 I do agree with Lincoln and Biden

01:00:20.080 talking in those terms.

01:00:23.300 Because they're talking in a term

01:00:24.600 that the Palestinians might want to hear.

01:00:27.460 As in,

01:00:28.360 oh yeah, we do want to have our own place

01:00:30.460 and run things.

01:00:31.540 We'd like to take over Israel too,

01:00:33.380 but at least you're not being crazy

01:00:35.780 saying that we would have a state

01:00:37.940 and we would be in charge.

01:00:39.260 So politically,

01:00:43.400 it's the right thing to say.

01:00:44.540 I would say the same thing.

01:00:46.100 But realistically,

01:00:47.140 it can't happen

01:00:47.960 because Israel's

01:00:49.240 going to need control.

01:00:51.940 Here's how you solve it.

01:00:54.400 I don't know if I've told you

01:00:55.760 I have a long background

01:00:57.220 in negotiating contracts and stuff.

01:01:00.140 And it's also something you learn

01:01:01.280 in business school,

01:01:02.380 negotiating.

01:01:03.400 So here's a little negotiating trick for you.

01:01:05.660 If you can't decide

01:01:06.960 how to make something work today,

01:01:09.420 you change the time frame.

01:01:12.120 Change the time frame.

01:01:13.540 That's one of the big variables

01:01:14.840 that you can make people agree

01:01:17.740 because there's no way

01:01:19.260 you'll get people to agree on day one.

01:01:21.060 There is no solution

01:01:23.240 for the first year

01:01:24.820 after the war is,

01:01:26.000 let's say, done.

01:01:27.340 There is no way to agree.

01:01:29.720 So you either have permanent war 0.73

01:01:31.440 or you agree

01:01:33.020 to agree later.

01:01:35.200 So here's what I think

01:01:36.340 is the only way they can go.

01:01:37.840 Make a 20-year plan

01:01:39.100 for the fate of Gaza

01:01:42.340 and the West Bank collectively.

01:01:44.280 So I do agree

01:01:45.020 that it needs to be treated

01:01:46.020 as one entity,

01:01:47.540 not Gaza as one entity

01:01:48.940 and the West Bank as a separate one.

01:01:50.800 I feel like that's,

01:01:52.680 maybe,

01:01:53.760 will be easy

01:01:54.540 to make that happen.

01:01:56.820 I think they have to say

01:01:58.080 on year one,

01:01:59.760 Israel will have 1.00

01:02:00.600 complete control

01:02:01.520 over the West Bank

01:02:02.680 and Gaza

01:02:03.280 for police,

01:02:04.440 security,

01:02:04.840 and schools.

01:02:06.600 Now,

01:02:07.420 whatever's happening

01:02:08.260 in the West Bank now,

01:02:09.820 you know,

01:02:10.020 make some adjustments to that

01:02:11.180 because if something's working

01:02:12.380 in the West Bank,

01:02:13.040 they'd probably keep it.

01:02:14.800 In other words,

01:02:15.520 if the Palestinian police

01:02:16.820 are doing a good job already,

01:02:19.840 you know,

01:02:20.040 maybe that's a stable situation.

01:02:22.080 You could extend to Gaza.

01:02:24.440 But,

01:02:25.220 generally speaking,

01:02:26.360 Israel would have 1.00

01:02:27.100 the veto

01:02:29.000 over anything

01:02:30.700 security-related.

01:02:33.040 Now,

01:02:33.240 I think there's no way

01:02:33.980 around that.

01:02:35.220 For the first year,

01:02:37.040 Israel's going to have 1.00

01:02:37.900 to have absolute

01:02:38.880 security control

01:02:40.500 as much as they can

01:02:42.100 over the area,

01:02:42.600 and they won't,

01:02:43.200 I don't think that they would

01:02:44.180 settle for anything less.

01:02:45.760 But,

01:02:46.400 if they said

01:02:47.300 our long-term goal

01:02:48.480 is to fix

01:02:49.900 the education system

01:02:51.020 so we're not trading

01:02:51.900 a bunch of young people

01:02:52.700 to be terrorists, 0.91

01:02:53.960 and to eventually

01:02:55.300 work together

01:02:57.360 productively

01:02:58.160 until you're partners,

01:03:00.280 and then you can really

01:03:01.200 let the Palestinian area 1.00

01:03:03.380 be free

01:03:04.260 or govern itself.

01:03:05.780 So you wait

01:03:08.140 your 20 years

01:03:09.360 with goals

01:03:11.480 along the way

01:03:12.400 that if there are

01:03:13.920 no terrorist attacks

01:03:15.020 or maybe

01:03:15.500 they're limited,

01:03:17.040 then you can say

01:03:18.100 that the experiment

01:03:19.040 succeeded,

01:03:20.200 and in 20 years

01:03:21.140 you've reprogrammed

01:03:22.360 the kids to be peaceful

01:03:23.520 and live together,

01:03:24.740 and you've reduced

01:03:26.720 the number of terror attacks

01:03:27.920 to small or nothing,

01:03:29.820 and then you say,

01:03:31.340 all right,

01:03:31.640 let's rethink this.

01:03:32.660 20 years has gone by.

01:03:34.100 I think you guys

01:03:34.860 can run your own country.

01:03:36.320 We'll save some money

01:03:37.300 because we don't need

01:03:38.260 to be your security.

01:03:39.180 We'll just save some money,

01:03:40.280 and let's live in peace

01:03:41.460 and be friends.

01:03:43.140 I suppose that could happen,

01:03:44.860 but here's what

01:03:45.720 more likely would happen.

01:03:47.440 At the end of 20 years

01:03:48.680 it would look exactly the same,

01:03:50.180 and then the Israelis say,

01:03:53.100 well, I guess no change.

01:03:54.840 I guess you can't run

01:03:55.780 your own place

01:03:56.360 because nothing changed.

01:03:57.780 Kids are still

01:03:58.520 being brainwashed

01:03:59.580 despite our best efforts,

01:04:01.240 we're still getting

01:04:02.380 terror attacks every day

01:04:03.640 despite having

01:04:05.080 full security control,

01:04:07.120 so it'd be worse

01:04:07.800 if we didn't,

01:04:09.240 so we've got to keep it.

01:04:11.820 So you've got to tell

01:04:13.560 the Palestinians

01:04:14.280 that you have a plan

01:04:15.660 for their independence,

01:04:17.760 not a plan to own Israel,

01:04:19.860 but a plan for the West Bank

01:04:21.060 and Gaza.

01:04:21.980 You have to tell them

01:04:22.780 there's a plan,

01:04:23.880 and you have to let them

01:04:25.360 try to achieve it,

01:04:26.580 as in if you can

01:04:29.040 tamp down your terrorism,

01:04:31.240 we will give you

01:04:32.700 all these concessions,

01:04:33.840 et cetera.

01:04:35.800 So the best-case scenario

01:04:37.980 is for Israel 0.77

01:04:39.480 to give the Palestinians 0.98

01:04:41.140 everything they ask for,

01:04:44.340 but not for 20 years,

01:04:46.520 and then watch them

01:04:48.780 fail for 20 years,

01:04:49.920 and then do whatever

01:04:51.680 you want at that point

01:04:53.040 because you would have

01:04:53.620 full security control.

01:04:54.700 So the Israelis 0.99

01:04:56.220 can make a fake deal

01:04:57.920 and say,

01:04:58.820 yeah,

01:04:59.380 if we can live together

01:05:01.080 for 20 years

01:05:01.860 and improve that whole time,

01:05:03.580 then we're better off

01:05:05.300 if you run your own place.

01:05:06.820 We don't want to be there anyway.

01:05:08.940 And that's a story

01:05:09.980 that I think you can sell

01:05:11.000 because they can always say,

01:05:12.860 well,

01:05:13.020 we could stop

01:05:13.800 doing some terrorism.

01:05:15.540 I think we could work that out

01:05:16.940 in 20 years.

01:05:18.400 So 20 years is long enough

01:05:20.060 that nobody thinks

01:05:20.800 they'll be in the same job.

01:05:21.860 So nobody thinks

01:05:24.140 that they'll be responsible

01:05:25.280 for the outcomes.

01:05:27.180 So they can agree to things

01:05:28.760 because they won't have to pay

01:05:30.160 the price if it doesn't work.

01:05:32.100 So I think you're going to have

01:05:32.940 to give the Palestinians 0.98

01:05:34.000 something that's real

01:05:35.620 in terms of

01:05:36.960 if they did meet these challenges,

01:05:39.620 they could have their own government

01:05:41.460 and their own state.

01:05:43.120 They'd still be unhappy

01:05:44.220 that they don't conquer Israel,

01:05:46.320 but you can work it out.

01:05:49.440 So I think that's the only way

01:05:50.860 it can go.

01:05:51.860 No matter what we talk about

01:05:55.060 until then,

01:05:56.360 it's going to have to be

01:05:57.300 a multi-year plan.

01:05:59.640 It's going to have to start

01:06:00.760 with Israel having full control 0.98

01:06:02.420 of everything they can control.

01:06:04.520 And there has to be

01:06:05.480 some kind of metric

01:06:07.140 or goal

01:06:08.160 or sub-goal

01:06:09.780 to change that situation

01:06:11.740 over time

01:06:12.460 or else everybody

01:06:13.920 will be permanently unhappy.

01:06:15.240 So there is no good solution,

01:06:18.440 but the fake solution

01:06:20.840 is probably the only one

01:06:22.480 they can do.

01:06:24.520 So I would go for a fake piece

01:06:27.400 with a 20-year plan.

01:06:30.980 Meanwhile, Israel is picking off 0.52

01:06:32.600 Hezbollah leaders.

01:06:34.120 They've got a couple of them

01:06:35.500 in Lebanon.

01:06:36.560 And you might say to yourself,

01:06:38.160 but Scott,

01:06:38.980 does this not mean

01:06:39.860 that Israel is going to 0.98

01:06:40.820 open another front

01:06:41.900 and Hezbollah is going to be

01:06:43.480 storming over the border

01:06:44.480 and attacking Israel?

01:06:45.560 And the answer is,

01:06:46.700 apparently not.

01:06:48.360 So here's the main thing

01:06:49.600 you need to know

01:06:50.180 about Hezbollah.

01:06:51.720 They have

01:06:52.560 tens of thousands

01:06:54.800 of missiles,

01:06:55.720 but they don't have

01:06:57.300 an offensive army

01:06:58.500 besides the missiles.

01:07:00.860 In other words,

01:07:01.320 they're not really

01:07:02.060 even organized

01:07:03.000 as like a proper military

01:07:04.760 that could invade a country.

01:07:07.840 So Hezbollah 0.99

01:07:09.080 is probably not going

01:07:10.000 to rush across the border

01:07:11.200 and start attacking.

01:07:14.200 It would be a bad idea

01:07:15.780 because if they did,

01:07:16.780 then Israel would turn 0.91

01:07:17.780 all of their guns

01:07:18.560 on Hezbollah

01:07:19.320 when they're done

01:07:19.840 with Gaza.

01:07:20.920 They would wipe them out 0.93

01:07:21.960 because they would have to.

01:07:23.400 They would have

01:07:23.940 enough support to do it.

01:07:26.780 So Hezbollah 0.99

01:07:27.380 could end its existence

01:07:28.800 if they attacked.

01:07:30.540 But on the other hand,

01:07:31.480 they have to keep doing

01:07:32.180 little missile attacks

01:07:33.260 to look like

01:07:34.220 they're still in business,

01:07:35.340 right?

01:07:36.080 Because their own supporters

01:07:37.240 need them to do something.

01:07:39.680 So Israel has apparently 0.91

01:07:41.300 cleverly deduced

01:07:42.840 that if they keep

01:07:44.780 their killings

01:07:45.580 to just their leaders

01:07:46.780 and Hezbollah

01:07:49.520 keeps their terrorism

01:07:50.820 to just missiles

01:07:52.540 that that's

01:07:54.780 a stable situation.

01:07:57.000 It's terrible,

01:07:58.280 but it's stable.

01:08:00.720 And I think both

01:08:01.400 Hezbollah and Israel 0.85

01:08:02.420 would be okay

01:08:03.360 with,

01:08:05.300 you know,

01:08:05.840 Hezbollah would be okay 1.00

01:08:07.100 if they could send

01:08:07.780 some missiles now and then.

01:08:09.280 And Israel would be okay 0.99

01:08:10.660 if they could kill 1.00

01:08:11.300 some leaders now and then. 0.99

01:08:12.800 But neither of them

01:08:13.660 have any interest

01:08:14.960 in a ground war.

01:08:16.440 So I think ground war 0.93

01:08:18.360 is kind of unlikely.

01:08:21.660 Partly because Hezbollah 1.00

01:08:22.600 doesn't have that capability.

01:08:24.700 All right.

01:08:25.260 Vivek had warned

01:08:26.560 that he might surprise

01:08:27.520 in Iowa

01:08:28.040 in the caucuses.

01:08:29.780 And we were wondering,

01:08:31.240 why does he think that?

01:08:33.340 Because the polling

01:08:34.200 does not show that.

01:08:35.880 But there are a couple

01:08:36.740 things going on

01:08:37.500 that look good.

01:08:38.220 One is,

01:08:39.240 he's done 239 events,

01:08:42.460 which is more

01:08:44.260 than the other three

01:08:45.240 combined.

01:08:47.020 So if you take

01:08:47.780 Trump,

01:08:48.560 DeSantis,

01:08:49.060 and Haley,

01:08:50.000 all of their events

01:08:51.000 combined in Iowa

01:08:52.020 are 174.

01:08:53.820 But Vivek by himself

01:08:55.280 has done 239.

01:08:58.000 Now he's also focusing

01:08:59.540 on colleges

01:09:00.440 and young people,

01:09:02.200 including free beer.

01:09:04.680 He's got like

01:09:05.340 a free beer thing

01:09:06.260 where if the college

01:09:08.580 kids come and listen

01:09:09.400 to him,

01:09:09.760 he'll pay for their beer tab.

01:09:12.140 So that's fun.

01:09:14.420 So he does seem

01:09:15.360 to have a strong

01:09:16.440 following among

01:09:17.340 the young

01:09:17.940 who are less likely

01:09:19.600 to get to

01:09:20.720 out in caucus,

01:09:21.600 but maybe this time

01:09:22.520 you can get them

01:09:23.020 to do it.

01:09:24.360 I think the worse

01:09:25.140 the weather is,

01:09:26.160 the less the young

01:09:27.860 people are going

01:09:28.340 to come out.

01:09:30.060 But so can Vivek

01:09:31.320 surprise?

01:09:32.580 Can he surprise

01:09:33.380 by doing more events

01:09:35.340 and by,

01:09:37.020 apparently most

01:09:37.800 of his supporters

01:09:38.340 are male.

01:09:39.840 No surprise there.

01:09:41.680 Most of his supporters

01:09:42.560 are young and male,

01:09:43.740 at least at the colleges.

01:09:45.020 Mostly male.

01:09:46.720 No surprise.

01:09:48.960 But,

01:09:50.160 as I've said

01:09:51.600 many times,

01:09:53.380 if America

01:09:54.620 is to be saved,

01:09:56.480 who's going

01:09:57.780 to do it?

01:10:00.220 You know who,

01:10:01.200 right?

01:10:02.540 It's going to be

01:10:03.220 the same people

01:10:03.760 who do it every time.

01:10:05.340 If America

01:10:06.260 is to be saved,

01:10:08.120 it'll be young men.

01:10:10.200 Young men

01:10:11.040 will say, 1.00

01:10:12.240 fuck this, 1.00

01:10:13.280 and they'll just 1.00

01:10:13.960 start overturning

01:10:15.500 all the tables.

01:10:17.320 Right?

01:10:17.780 You can always

01:10:18.480 depend on young men 0.99

01:10:19.660 to break anything

01:10:20.820 that needs to get broken.

01:10:22.480 If you want to

01:10:23.360 fix something,

01:10:24.800 or you want to

01:10:25.300 build something,

01:10:26.740 you know,

01:10:26.940 not every young man

01:10:27.980 is good at that.

01:10:29.040 You know,

01:10:29.220 some Steve Jobs

01:10:30.320 and Bill Gates are.

01:10:31.720 But generally,

01:10:32.680 your average young man

01:10:33.740 is better at breaking

01:10:34.560 but if you need,

01:10:36.020 if you've got a system

01:10:36.920 that's not working

01:10:37.820 and you need it broken,

01:10:40.420 call the young people.

01:10:43.220 Yeah.

01:10:43.840 Get your,

01:10:44.440 your Hamiltons

01:10:46.120 and your Jeffersons.

01:10:47.820 Yeah.

01:10:48.780 On the younger side.

01:10:49.920 So I do think

01:10:52.680 that maybe

01:10:53.300 Vivek may have

01:10:54.460 a secret hidden card here

01:10:56.600 which is a lot

01:10:57.320 of young men

01:10:58.080 if he can get them

01:10:59.400 mobilized.

01:11:00.060 The mobilizing them

01:11:00.860 is a hard part

01:11:01.500 but they seem to like him.

01:11:03.340 Whether they show up

01:11:04.080 in caucus

01:11:04.540 is a separate question.

01:11:07.660 But we'll see.

01:11:08.440 So

01:11:10.500 that,

01:11:15.740 ladies and gentlemen,

01:11:16.860 is my excellent

01:11:17.580 live stream for today.

01:11:21.260 I don't think

01:11:22.100 anybody will match

01:11:23.060 my presidential

01:11:23.880 prediction

01:11:25.140 but there it is.

01:11:29.200 And

01:11:29.640 I'm seeing,

01:11:31.860 I'm seeing

01:11:32.520 indications

01:11:33.240 that Trump

01:11:33.920 is going to

01:11:35.660 flat out

01:11:36.160 win the Hispanic vote.

01:11:37.480 Do you think so?

01:11:40.700 Do you believe

01:11:41.200 the polling

01:11:41.760 that says

01:11:43.180 that Trump

01:11:43.620 would not just

01:11:44.280 do better than normal

01:11:45.340 but would flat out

01:11:46.780 win the Hispanic vote?

01:11:49.540 I'm going to say

01:11:50.340 I don't believe that.

01:11:52.420 I don't believe that.

01:11:53.560 But I think

01:11:54.280 you'll do better

01:11:54.800 than people expect.

01:11:57.520 Now what about

01:11:58.260 the black vote?

01:12:00.040 You know,

01:12:00.220 the polls are showing

01:12:01.060 that he would still

01:12:01.780 lose the black vote

01:12:02.720 but he would close 0.99

01:12:03.900 the gap

01:12:04.960 more than any

01:12:05.800 Republican

01:12:06.320 ever closed the gap.

01:12:07.480 That part I believe.

01:12:09.520 I do believe

01:12:10.540 he's going to be

01:12:11.160 have the best

01:12:11.920 black support

01:12:12.940 of any Republican.

01:12:20.900 Yeah,

01:12:21.480 of black men.

01:12:22.540 Right. 0.69

01:12:23.020 I think black women 1.00

01:12:23.920 will be solidly Biden

01:12:25.320 and

01:12:26.700 oh,

01:12:27.160 okay,

01:12:27.660 I'm good.

01:12:28.580 Do you think

01:12:29.200 that

01:12:29.540 Trump will win 0.82

01:12:30.820 more than half

01:12:31.560 of black men?

01:12:34.200 I don't know

01:12:34.820 about that.

01:12:35.340 I'm not sure

01:12:36.300 I would make

01:12:36.720 that bet

01:12:37.140 but he'll do

01:12:38.420 better than

01:12:38.860 people expect.

01:12:43.220 All right.

01:12:44.080 Yeah,

01:12:44.340 I believe

01:12:44.900 well,

01:12:45.620 men in general

01:12:46.860 don't like

01:12:47.380 weak men.

01:12:48.800 Women in general

01:12:49.660 usually don't

01:12:50.540 like weak men

01:12:51.480 unless they're

01:12:51.960 afraid of the

01:12:52.480 strong ones.

01:12:53.600 I think

01:12:53.900 Trump is

01:12:54.420 scary by his

01:12:55.580 persona.

01:12:56.640 All right.

01:13:00.760 Oh yeah,

01:13:01.060 so this is funny.

01:13:03.500 So cartoonist

01:13:04.140 Ben Garrison

01:13:04.880 who's my

01:13:05.360 nemesis.

01:13:06.740 He started

01:13:07.320 with his

01:13:08.180 cartoons,

01:13:08.720 he started

01:13:09.060 a bunch of

01:13:09.600 fake news

01:13:10.480 about me

01:13:10.960 and vaccines

01:13:11.780 but he

01:13:13.400 didn't know

01:13:13.840 it.

01:13:14.080 I don't think

01:13:14.440 he knew it

01:13:14.940 but he used

01:13:15.860 the dementia

01:13:16.500 Hitler 0.78

01:13:16.900 meme

01:13:18.060 that I

01:13:19.400 created

01:13:19.880 and made

01:13:20.760 a cartoon

01:13:21.480 around it

01:13:22.100 and I think

01:13:22.960 then people

01:13:23.440 immediately said

01:13:24.140 hey,

01:13:24.460 you're using

01:13:24.900 Scott Adams'

01:13:25.540 meme in your

01:13:27.100 cartoon

01:13:27.480 which is

01:13:28.440 funny.

01:13:32.260 All right.

01:13:37.220 Fanny 0.65

01:13:37.860 Willis is

01:13:38.440 the poor

01:13:38.860 woman's 0.82

01:13:39.580 Kamala Harris.

01:13:42.560 Yeah,

01:13:42.960 Greg

01:13:43.540 Guffield

01:13:44.040 mentioned

01:13:44.500 dementia

01:13:45.120 Hitler 0.78

01:13:45.420 yesterday

01:13:46.020 on the

01:13:46.300 show.

01:13:47.300 So

01:13:47.560 it's not

01:13:48.600 trending

01:13:48.980 but I

01:13:49.840 think we

01:13:50.120 can get

01:13:50.400 it trending

01:13:50.780 again.

01:13:51.840 All right,

01:13:52.220 thanks for

01:13:52.620 joining

01:13:52.940 everybody

01:13:54.060 on

01:13:54.660 YouTube

01:13:55.760 and

01:13:56.060 Rumble

01:13:56.440 and

01:13:56.940 X

01:13:57.860 platform.

01:13:58.980 See you

01:13:59.420 tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 09, 2024

Episode 2348 CWSA 01⧸09⧸24 My Prediction For The 2024 Election. You Won't Like It

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript