Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 18, 2024


Episode 2357 CWSA 01⧸18⧸24


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 13 minutes

Words per minute

142.72644

Word count

10,504

Sentence count

838

Harmful content

Misogyny

28

sentences flagged

Hate speech

37

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, Scott talks about the new Apple Vision Pro virtual reality glasses, and the president of Argentina, Mauricio Millet. Plus, a story about a man who thinks he should wear the glasses in the office.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:11.020 It's the highlight of your life, and today it's even better with an improved microphone
00:00:15.100 for at least the locals' platform.
00:00:17.660 The rest of you already had the good microphone, and everybody was jealous,
00:00:20.740 and now everybody's got a good microphone, and everything's good.
00:00:25.320 And if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand
00:00:29.360 with their small human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass,
00:00:34.000 a tankard chalzerstein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:38.940 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:42.720 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:46.540 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:48.200 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.
00:00:51.540 Go.
00:00:56.360 Oh, that was good.
00:00:57.580 Honestly, it's not always good, even when I say it is, but this one's actually really good.
00:01:06.820 And I think that's telling you that the day will be amazing.
00:01:10.020 So yesterday I saw a news story, and there was a black gentleman who was the subject of the news
00:01:19.700 story, and I couldn't help but note that his last name was Mayo, M-A-Y-O.
00:01:27.460 And then I thought to myself, ah, that's not really funny.
00:01:30.800 It's just that it would just look like a racial comment or something.
00:01:34.360 That's not really funny.
00:01:35.100 But, you know, my mind is always looking for patterns, so it just saw, ah, Mayo.
00:01:40.620 Within minutes, I saw another story in the news about something called Mayo.
00:01:47.420 And then within an hour, I saw a third story about Mayo.
00:01:52.520 There were three Mayo-related stories in the news at the same time.
00:01:57.620 Now, it's only because I noticed the first one, right?
00:02:02.560 That's how that works.
00:02:04.200 If you notice the first one, and then the other ones just come online because you changed your filter.
00:02:09.880 I think that's what's happening.
00:02:12.460 But if you see, let's do this test.
00:02:15.840 If during the day you notice something about Mayo or mayonnaise or the Mayo Clinic,
00:02:22.300 just remember I told you, you're going to notice it.
00:02:26.920 So this will be a little test.
00:02:28.740 It's called reticular activation, meaning that once you've seen something,
00:02:33.560 it becomes part of your filter and you see more of it.
00:02:36.780 All right, Apple has released this Apple Vision Pro.
00:02:41.480 It's glasses for virtual reality.
00:02:44.200 And the first reports are coming in.
00:02:46.480 Apparently this thing, some say, weighs close to a pound.
00:02:49.480 And people's necks are getting tired after their half an hour.
00:02:54.060 Does that surprise you?
00:02:56.440 That people aren't delighted wearing the glasses?
00:03:00.780 Well, I'm going to give you a little preview.
00:03:02.760 If you were subscribing to the Dilbert Reborn comic on Locals or on the X platform,
00:03:09.680 you would know that Wally is going to give some of those Apple Vision Pro glasses.
00:03:16.280 He's going to try wearing them in the office.
00:03:17.760 And his boss is going to say, you know, Wally, you're not allowed to wear VR glasses during meetings.
00:03:23.820 And Wally is going to say, they're prescription.
00:03:28.640 And then the boss is going to say, you can't tell me I can't wear prescription lenses.
00:03:36.640 Yeah.
00:03:37.700 And then from there on, Wally will never have to pay attention in a meeting again
00:03:42.040 because he's got prescription VR glasses.
00:03:48.720 It's allowed under the Disabilities Act.
00:03:52.920 Well, as you know, Argentinian President Millet went to the World Economic Forum.
00:03:59.920 And he basically, let's see, how did they put that in the news?
00:04:06.600 The way they worded it delicately was, took the, okay, they took the entire philosophy of the World Economic Forum.
00:04:16.680 He balled it into a little ball and shoved it up all of their asses. 1.00
00:04:20.820 No, they didn't say that, but that's what it felt like.
00:04:24.300 He basically said, collectivism in all its forms creates poverty.
00:04:29.180 And you guys are all about collectivism.
00:04:32.700 He said that at the World Economic Forum.
00:04:36.080 Now, I was already inclined to like him.
00:04:39.680 And I was liking him a lot.
00:04:43.420 But it was still platonic.
00:04:45.900 Now I would just do him.
00:04:47.680 I would just do him.
00:04:48.680 I'm hetero, but, you know, god damn it.
00:04:51.300 Stop making me love you this much.
00:04:53.420 It's starting to get physical.
00:04:55.280 I can't even control it anymore.
00:04:58.560 How much do you love the fact that he just went to the WEF and just laid him out and then left?
00:05:05.620 Well, he's probably still there.
00:05:06.840 Well, there's another part of that story that's equally interesting.
00:05:11.920 So he did his speech in his native language, and it was quickly translated.
00:05:16.380 So we got to watch the speaker as well as the translation.
00:05:20.580 But David Sachs was posting today on X.
00:05:24.980 There's a version in which they use the AI app HeyGen to rework his speech
00:05:31.880 so that it's perfectly in his voice, but in perfect English, and even his lips match.
00:05:42.600 Oh, my God.
00:05:44.600 Now, I keep telling you AI is not as impressive as you want it to be, and I still say that,
00:05:53.740 but mostly in terms of the intelligence part.
00:05:56.900 The part where AI just solves what I'd call a basic computer problem, a translation,
00:06:04.380 that's not what I think of as intelligence.
00:06:06.840 But with the AI stack, apparently you can do these basic technology things 100 times better.
00:06:15.240 So how close are we, putting two stories together,
00:06:20.140 how close are we to me being able to put on the Apple Vision Pro VR glasses,
00:06:27.460 watch a non-native English speaker speak to me right in front of me,
00:06:31.740 and have it translate in real time so even the lips match the English translation?
00:06:39.760 One year?
00:06:41.640 I say one year maximum.
00:06:44.560 At the most, one year.
00:06:46.300 Because there's going to be a delay,
00:06:48.000 so it probably has more to do with how much of it they can process locally, right?
00:06:54.020 That would be the big variable.
00:06:55.540 It's just how local it is.
00:06:56.660 If they have to go to the cloud,
00:06:58.420 there'll be just a little bit too much latency, I think.
00:07:00.840 But if they can do that locally, oh my God.
00:07:04.780 And I think they can.
00:07:05.800 And I think that's actually a thing that can be done.
00:07:10.300 Anyway, collectivism leads to poverty.
00:07:13.600 Collectivism in all its forms.
00:07:15.900 Now, how do you define collectivism?
00:07:21.140 It took me a while to figure out, okay, is that the right word?
00:07:25.680 So collectivism, as I understand it,
00:07:28.320 maybe I have the wrong definition,
00:07:30.460 is where people are working together
00:07:33.060 as opposed to individuals pursuing their own best situation.
00:07:38.760 Is that what collectivism is?
00:07:40.580 Just the forced working as a group
00:07:44.860 instead of the free market allowing you to work individually?
00:07:48.160 And I would say that socialism is a subset,
00:07:53.600 but just one subset of collectivism.
00:07:56.020 Am I right?
00:07:57.300 Collectivism is the bigger group.
00:07:59.600 Socialism would be just one of those examples of it.
00:08:02.980 Communism would be a different one.
00:08:05.300 Yeah.
00:08:06.100 And then, you know, a lot of things that we do,
00:08:08.100 like socialized medicine, would be collective.
00:08:11.120 Although I'm not terribly against that.
00:08:13.780 All right, so Matt Walsh is proclaiming the lack of value in therapy.
00:08:23.600 Now, a lot of people have been saying that,
00:08:25.280 especially conservative-leaning people,
00:08:28.060 that going to therapy is a waste of time.
00:08:32.280 Now, I remind you,
00:08:33.780 because this is the smartest audience in the world,
00:08:37.180 that whenever anybody makes,
00:08:39.720 and this is really universal,
00:08:41.560 when people make comments like something doesn't work
00:08:45.260 or these people are like that
00:08:47.660 or this group does things like that,
00:08:50.040 they never mean everybody, right?
00:08:53.320 So when Matt Walsh says, you know,
00:08:55.500 therapy is usually a waste of time,
00:08:57.120 he doesn't, I haven't asked him,
00:08:59.780 but just a reasonable interpretation is,
00:09:02.900 it doesn't mean everybody every time, right?
00:09:06.300 That it never works under any situations.
00:09:09.280 I don't, I think that'd be too far.
00:09:10.740 And I don't think,
00:09:12.280 I don't believe that Matt Walsh believes that.
00:09:15.020 He's just using ordinary way of talking.
00:09:17.660 And when you talk in an ordinary way on social media,
00:09:20.880 somebody's going to misinterpret you.
00:09:22.660 Anyway, David Sutcliffe,
00:09:24.720 you might recognize him as being an actor,
00:09:27.800 whose face you'd recognize.
00:09:29.420 But he's transitioned in the last several years
00:09:31.700 into a therapist.
00:09:33.600 So he's a trained therapist.
00:09:35.020 I mentioned on a show that I saw him doing a,
00:09:38.380 on camera,
00:09:40.600 I'm not sure if it was therapy
00:09:42.400 or just a conversation with Andrew Tate.
00:09:45.380 And I was so impressed
00:09:46.960 just with the entire,
00:09:49.980 the entire show of it.
00:09:51.700 I mean, just something,
00:09:52.820 as something to watch,
00:09:54.420 to watch how therapy could work
00:09:57.200 or what the techniques are.
00:09:59.020 It was just fascinating.
00:10:00.120 So anyway,
00:10:01.620 tying this together,
00:10:06.240 so after Matt Walsh said some bad things
00:10:08.320 about the value of therapy,
00:10:10.140 David Sutcliffe weighed in in the comments
00:10:12.260 and he says,
00:10:13.840 he challenges,
00:10:17.280 he challenges him
00:10:18.220 to an on-camera therapy session.
00:10:21.420 Wouldn't you like to see that?
00:10:22.920 Now, I don't know,
00:10:25.300 my guess is that Matt Walsh
00:10:27.420 doesn't need any therapy at all
00:10:29.420 because that's,
00:10:30.500 that's his starting point.
00:10:31.860 His starting point is
00:10:32.860 probably don't need any.
00:10:35.080 You know,
00:10:35.260 I can handle it myself.
00:10:36.620 Now, I don't know if that's what he's thinking
00:10:38.000 because I'm no mind reader.
00:10:39.960 But,
00:10:40.980 I hope that Matt Walsh
00:10:42.700 takes him up on this
00:10:43.940 because this feels to me
00:10:45.740 like it would further
00:10:46.680 both of their arguments.
00:10:49.220 And my interpretation
00:10:50.480 of their arguments,
00:10:51.540 which is always dicey,
00:10:52.480 it's always dangerous
00:10:53.980 when you're interpreting
00:10:54.800 somebody else's argument
00:10:55.900 or summarizing it.
00:10:57.280 So, I hope I'm doing it right.
00:10:58.860 But, my interpretation would be
00:11:00.400 Matt Walsh says
00:11:02.000 it's mostly a waste of time
00:11:03.520 and I'll bet it is.
00:11:05.620 Mostly.
00:11:06.380 That's my own observation.
00:11:08.500 But, I would agree with,
00:11:10.460 especially after watching him in action,
00:11:12.740 David Sutcliffe,
00:11:14.020 if you watch him for five minutes,
00:11:16.380 you're going to say to yourself,
00:11:17.580 okay,
00:11:18.060 even if I don't like therapy,
00:11:19.980 I feel like I would have paid for that.
00:11:22.480 You know what I'm saying?
00:11:24.900 Like, you watch David Sutcliffe
00:11:26.680 talking to Andrew Tate
00:11:28.320 for five minutes
00:11:29.840 and you would say to yourself,
00:11:31.440 okay,
00:11:31.920 I would pay for that.
00:11:33.980 So, I hope it happens.
00:11:35.480 It would be great.
00:11:37.160 I told some of you
00:11:38.420 that Brian Romelli,
00:11:40.480 who's an AI expert,
00:11:43.100 who's building his own AI models locally,
00:11:46.680 things you can run on your own machines
00:11:48.120 and all kinds of interesting AI experiments.
00:11:51.560 But, one of the things he's doing
00:11:52.800 is he's training his own AI from scratch
00:11:55.260 and not using the same kind of training sources
00:11:58.700 that the well-known AIs are using.
00:12:02.040 Now, obviously, there's a limitation
00:12:04.400 to using, let's say,
00:12:06.600 the general current body of language in the world
00:12:11.400 because you're going to end up
00:12:12.920 with a modern version of, you know,
00:12:16.500 ethics and the way of operating.
00:12:18.400 In other words,
00:12:18.920 it would be biased toward
00:12:20.020 how people act in 2023
00:12:23.060 or whenever they got the data.
00:12:25.440 So, one of the things
00:12:27.420 about our earlier American experience
00:12:29.400 is that people had different attitudes
00:12:31.060 and it was more of a can-do,
00:12:33.860 you know, let's make this happen,
00:12:35.500 go to the moon,
00:12:36.860 greatest country, you know.
00:12:38.360 So, there were some advantages
00:12:39.640 to our earlier American point of view.
00:12:44.200 So, one of the things Brian's doing,
00:12:45.660 and again, I may be mischaracterizing it a little bit,
00:12:48.140 but the basic idea
00:12:49.100 is he's using non-standard data
00:12:54.180 to train his AI.
00:12:55.820 And among them,
00:12:56.560 he talks about getting access
00:12:57.920 to a huge trove of science fiction magazines
00:13:01.980 and comics in the public domain.
00:13:04.820 So, now he can train it
00:13:07.320 on like this 50s science fiction stuff,
00:13:10.000 which will be fascinating
00:13:11.400 to see how different it would be
00:13:12.660 than something, you know,
00:13:14.420 that using more generic sense.
00:13:16.020 But the interesting part is
00:13:17.360 I offered to him
00:13:18.340 that he could use
00:13:20.020 all of my published materials
00:13:21.740 to train his machine.
00:13:24.920 Now, as you know,
00:13:26.600 it's going to be a minefield
00:13:27.660 that the AIs that are being developed,
00:13:30.560 they might get sued.
00:13:32.020 They're already being sued by authors.
00:13:33.660 So, the hard part will get permission.
00:13:37.220 If you wanted to train your AI,
00:13:39.140 you have to use public domain stuff
00:13:40.920 like Brian is doing,
00:13:42.880 go back in time
00:13:43.820 to get enough public domain,
00:13:45.520 or you get permission.
00:13:50.580 So, because my body of work
00:13:52.360 is so extensive,
00:13:53.580 you know, 50 books
00:13:54.580 and thousands of hours of video
00:13:56.580 and 11,000 comics,
00:13:59.860 if I make it available to him,
00:14:01.440 which I did,
00:14:02.100 just publicly,
00:14:03.020 I gave him permission on X,
00:14:05.320 which, by the way,
00:14:06.160 is a binding contract.
00:14:10.060 Isn't that funny?
00:14:11.720 I just,
00:14:12.560 I issued a binding contract
00:14:14.420 on the X platform
00:14:16.100 because I said in public,
00:14:18.660 you specifically have my permission
00:14:20.580 to do this thing,
00:14:22.220 and he accepted.
00:14:23.120 Would that not stand up
00:14:26.800 in a court of law?
00:14:28.800 Am I,
00:14:29.280 that's a,
00:14:29.640 it's a verbal agreement.
00:14:30.700 It just happens to be written down,
00:14:31.940 right?
00:14:33.120 Is there anybody who's a lawyer?
00:14:34.920 I believe that's a contract.
00:14:36.900 Am I wrong?
00:14:38.360 It's not signed,
00:14:39.540 but it's,
00:14:40.300 it's,
00:14:40.700 you know,
00:14:41.220 the identities of the people
00:14:42.720 is obvious.
00:14:43.880 The intention of the people
00:14:45.260 is obvious.
00:14:45.900 It's in writing.
00:14:47.180 We have an offer
00:14:48.120 and an agreement.
00:14:48.760 I believe I did
00:14:51.660 a legal contract on tax.
00:14:54.060 Right?
00:14:56.140 Yeah,
00:14:56.600 it could be used in court.
00:14:57.960 Now,
00:14:58.240 it's not bulletproof.
00:14:59.640 That's why you get a lawyer,
00:15:00.940 but,
00:15:01.440 you know,
00:15:01.760 I don't think there'll be a problem.
00:15:04.140 Anyway,
00:15:06.300 so my pattern
00:15:08.220 is now,
00:15:09.740 my pattern as in
00:15:10.700 the pattern of my thoughts,
00:15:12.580 in theory,
00:15:13.280 if Brian uses my material,
00:15:14.580 would become part of
00:15:16.700 at least one
00:15:17.740 permanent AI
00:15:19.660 pattern bank.
00:15:23.020 So,
00:15:23.440 it wouldn't necessarily
00:15:24.740 be reproducing
00:15:26.200 my,
00:15:26.700 you know,
00:15:27.320 writing and personality
00:15:28.380 per se.
00:15:29.560 It's just that my patterns
00:15:31.000 would be in there.
00:15:32.240 So,
00:15:32.500 that would include things like
00:15:33.900 talent stacks
00:15:35.680 being better than being
00:15:37.020 just great at one thing.
00:15:38.660 Things like systems
00:15:39.640 being better than goals.
00:15:41.780 Things about
00:15:42.540 how I write humor.
00:15:44.500 Things about my opinion.
00:15:46.340 Things about persuasion.
00:15:47.740 So,
00:15:48.580 because my body of work
00:15:51.200 has such a wide,
00:15:53.080 I don't know,
00:15:55.140 wide basket or something,
00:15:57.640 you could probably get
00:15:58.940 something good out of that.
00:16:00.480 Now,
00:16:00.760 I'm going to make
00:16:01.100 another prediction.
00:16:03.860 We're all worried
00:16:04.980 about how AI
00:16:06.120 will perform ethically.
00:16:08.300 Meaning,
00:16:09.020 what if AI
00:16:09.600 goes rogue
00:16:10.380 and decides
00:16:10.920 to kill us all
00:16:11.760 to make more paper clips?
00:16:13.880 You know,
00:16:14.080 the usual experiment.
00:16:16.120 And,
00:16:16.560 I don't know
00:16:17.240 if anybody's come up
00:16:18.080 with an idea yet
00:16:19.080 how to give ethics
00:16:20.920 to a computer.
00:16:22.260 Has anybody done that?
00:16:23.940 I mean,
00:16:24.240 I'm,
00:16:24.400 well,
00:16:24.780 obviously they tried.
00:16:26.260 Obviously,
00:16:26.740 lots of people
00:16:27.240 are working on it
00:16:27.920 even as we speak.
00:16:28.880 But let me give you
00:16:29.880 my best suggestion.
00:16:32.540 And maybe it's a stopgap
00:16:34.140 until we can do better.
00:16:35.940 If I wanted to make AI
00:16:37.800 act ethically
00:16:39.400 in all situations,
00:16:41.400 knowing in advance
00:16:42.460 that there would be
00:16:43.060 lots of gray areas
00:16:44.440 and new situations
00:16:45.360 that I couldn't program directly,
00:16:47.520 it would be easy
00:16:48.120 to tell AI,
00:16:49.720 don't murder.
00:16:51.220 Because,
00:16:51.660 you know,
00:16:51.780 murder is well-defined.
00:16:53.440 Don't steal.
00:16:54.820 Well-defined.
00:16:55.620 But there are lots
00:16:56.680 of gray areas
00:16:57.660 in ethics,
00:16:58.380 right?
00:16:59.080 You know,
00:16:59.420 that's why it's
00:17:00.480 not cut and dry.
00:17:02.480 So,
00:17:03.100 here's how I would
00:17:03.820 solve the gray areas.
00:17:05.800 I would program my AI
00:17:07.240 to imitate
00:17:09.280 the character
00:17:10.520 of an actual
00:17:12.480 living person.
00:17:14.180 Now,
00:17:14.820 not any character
00:17:15.860 that nobody knows about,
00:17:17.200 what they do
00:17:17.680 in their private life,
00:17:18.460 but what the public
00:17:20.220 record says
00:17:21.880 about that person's
00:17:23.280 character,
00:17:24.440 right?
00:17:25.060 Now,
00:17:25.640 let's just pick a person.
00:17:28.660 Yeah,
00:17:29.020 pick Jordan Peterson.
00:17:30.660 Pick anybody
00:17:31.880 who you believe
00:17:32.820 would make the right
00:17:33.780 decision
00:17:34.340 when nobody's watching.
00:17:37.860 Pick people you believe
00:17:39.320 would make the right
00:17:40.200 decision
00:17:40.740 when nobody's watching.
00:17:43.060 I would,
00:17:44.220 I'm seeing some names
00:17:45.320 go by,
00:17:45.780 I'll just read them.
00:17:46.740 Somebody said,
00:17:47.540 Brett Weinstein.
00:17:48.620 I agree.
00:17:50.120 I agree.
00:17:50.540 I mean,
00:17:51.200 I don't know him
00:17:51.860 intimately,
00:17:52.720 but everything I can see
00:17:54.180 about Brett
00:17:55.000 would suggest
00:17:56.400 he would always
00:17:57.880 prefer acting ethically
00:17:59.280 and he would do so
00:18:01.140 when you're not watching.
00:18:02.720 Ben Shapiro,
00:18:03.660 Thomas Massey,
00:18:04.560 these are interesting names.
00:18:06.800 I don't disagree 0.95
00:18:07.600 with any of those.
00:18:08.920 There are a few
00:18:09.420 I'm not going to read
00:18:10.080 that I disagree with.
00:18:11.440 Mother Teresa
00:18:12.040 is actually an edge case.
00:18:15.280 Yeah,
00:18:15.500 Mother Teresa,
00:18:16.580 you know,
00:18:16.800 you could imagine
00:18:17.380 you're Billy Graham's
00:18:18.380 if you wanted to go religious.
00:18:19.460 That would give you
00:18:20.280 another problem.
00:18:22.680 Michael Schellenberger,
00:18:24.080 I believe he is
00:18:24.840 completely honest,
00:18:25.960 privately.
00:18:26.520 Vivek,
00:18:27.940 Victor David Hanson,
00:18:30.360 yeah.
00:18:31.300 So,
00:18:32.480 Lee Zeldin,
00:18:33.340 Naval,
00:18:34.460 yeah,
00:18:34.960 these are really good names.
00:18:36.340 You know,
00:18:36.860 I see Jack Posobiec
00:18:38.860 and I agree
00:18:39.740 that he's going to
00:18:40.800 tell the truth
00:18:41.460 in private
00:18:42.180 as well as public,
00:18:43.720 but you want to
00:18:44.600 stay away from
00:18:45.180 the overtly
00:18:46.560 political people
00:18:48.460 who are in the realm.
00:18:49.520 Yeah,
00:18:50.940 I think I would
00:18:51.760 avoid anybody
00:18:52.740 who's getting
00:18:53.860 a paycheck
00:18:54.360 for talking
00:18:55.100 about politics,
00:18:56.100 which would probably
00:18:57.380 include me as well.
00:19:00.040 Yeah,
00:19:00.300 but that's the way
00:19:01.220 I'd go.
00:19:02.400 Yeah,
00:19:02.660 you can imagine
00:19:03.600 just giving your
00:19:04.640 device a character
00:19:06.240 and say,
00:19:07.280 before you make
00:19:08.580 any decision,
00:19:09.620 you must run it
00:19:10.380 through the character
00:19:11.300 filter
00:19:11.740 and say,
00:19:13.640 would
00:19:14.000 would Brett
00:19:15.680 Weinstein
00:19:16.120 do it?
00:19:18.300 Yeah,
00:19:18.600 would Thomas Sowell
00:19:19.400 do it?
00:19:20.020 Yeah.
00:19:20.620 Would
00:19:20.940 Martin Luther King
00:19:23.300 do it?
00:19:25.500 Would Zuby
00:19:26.340 do it?
00:19:28.420 I'm going to throw
00:19:29.060 Zuby in there
00:19:29.960 with the great
00:19:31.140 philosophers
00:19:31.720 of our time
00:19:32.580 because he earned it.
00:19:35.160 Because he earned it.
00:19:36.280 All right.
00:19:40.100 So,
00:19:40.900 here's some more
00:19:41.460 fun news.
00:19:43.600 The famous
00:19:44.160 Phil Bump,
00:19:45.180 who writes for the
00:19:46.220 disgraced
00:19:46.900 Washington Post,
00:19:49.860 what I call
00:19:50.740 the Washington
00:19:51.300 Poop.
00:19:52.460 Now,
00:19:52.820 Phil Bump,
00:19:53.440 as you know,
00:19:54.080 at least to
00:19:54.620 conservative
00:19:55.180 viewers of politics,
00:19:57.360 is considered
00:19:58.000 sort of the joke.
00:19:59.540 He's sort of
00:19:59.980 the court jester
00:20:01.640 of writers,
00:20:03.020 at least from
00:20:03.680 the conservative
00:20:04.280 side of the world.
00:20:05.680 So,
00:20:06.600 he's the one
00:20:07.340 you expect
00:20:07.920 to lie about
00:20:08.760 stuff like
00:20:09.700 Hunter's laptop.
00:20:12.440 He is considered
00:20:13.580 by the right,
00:20:15.080 not by the left.
00:20:16.220 The left just
00:20:16.740 think he's
00:20:17.420 spewing facts.
00:20:19.780 People on the left
00:20:20.900 think he's just
00:20:22.780 telling them
00:20:23.480 what's true.
00:20:24.620 People on the right
00:20:25.460 would consider him
00:20:26.520 sort of a joke
00:20:27.320 of a writer
00:20:28.200 and just in the bag
00:20:29.720 for some forces
00:20:31.520 of keeping things
00:20:34.600 Democrat,
00:20:36.280 I guess.
00:20:37.620 But here's
00:20:38.720 the fun part.
00:20:39.500 He wrote an article
00:20:40.420 in which his,
00:20:42.360 the title of it
00:20:43.640 was,
00:20:44.020 Doing Your Own
00:20:44.620 Research is a Good
00:20:45.640 Way to End
00:20:46.220 Up Being Wrong.
00:20:48.480 So,
00:20:48.840 Phil Bump,
00:20:50.340 who is often
00:20:51.120 accused of being
00:20:51.900 one of the,
00:20:55.400 oh,
00:20:55.620 I see David
00:20:56.180 Sutcliffe
00:20:56.620 already saw
00:20:57.180 my post about,
00:20:58.360 he's boosting
00:21:01.000 my post about
00:21:01.860 going out
00:21:02.580 and talking
00:21:02.960 to Walsh.
00:21:06.280 Isn't that
00:21:07.320 funny?
00:21:08.400 The immediacy
00:21:09.180 of this,
00:21:09.980 this medium?
00:21:11.880 So I'm just
00:21:12.360 talking to you
00:21:13.020 about,
00:21:13.660 you know,
00:21:14.100 these two
00:21:14.620 public figures
00:21:15.500 and then
00:21:16.280 at the same
00:21:16.820 time,
00:21:17.680 you're telling
00:21:18.260 me in the
00:21:18.700 comments while
00:21:19.440 I'm doing
00:21:19.780 this live
00:21:20.400 that those
00:21:21.340 two public
00:21:22.000 figures may
00:21:23.540 have a greater
00:21:24.040 chance of talking
00:21:24.880 because of
00:21:25.380 something I did
00:21:26.020 just before I
00:21:26.640 came online,
00:21:27.800 you know,
00:21:27.960 just boosted
00:21:28.840 it as a
00:21:29.760 good idea.
00:21:32.000 So it's just
00:21:33.240 weird how
00:21:33.640 immediate
00:21:34.040 everything is
00:21:34.740 now.
00:21:35.720 It's kind of
00:21:36.380 mind-blowing,
00:21:36.960 isn't it?
00:21:38.060 That you just
00:21:38.840 would send me
00:21:39.360 that comment 0.92
00:21:39.940 and then it
00:21:41.100 just became
00:21:41.600 part of reality
00:21:42.440 like while
00:21:43.440 you watched.
00:21:44.940 It's amazing.
00:21:45.840 Anyway,
00:21:46.640 so Phil Bump
00:21:47.700 is getting a
00:21:48.500 lot of pushback
00:21:49.340 because it's
00:21:49.840 funny that
00:21:50.500 someone who's
00:21:51.500 famous as a
00:21:52.480 pusher of
00:21:53.040 misinformation,
00:21:54.600 according to
00:21:55.180 the right,
00:21:55.640 the people
00:21:56.880 on the left
00:21:57.360 would say
00:21:57.720 he's a
00:21:59.080 beacon of
00:21:59.640 truth.
00:22:02.200 But I
00:22:03.980 have to
00:22:04.260 agree with
00:22:04.740 Phil Bump
00:22:05.260 on this,
00:22:05.800 although I
00:22:07.220 consider him
00:22:07.880 my political
00:22:10.420 nemesis.
00:22:12.840 He's
00:22:13.280 completely
00:22:14.180 right.
00:22:14.660 I didn't
00:22:14.920 read the
00:22:15.260 article,
00:22:15.680 of course.
00:22:16.040 I'm not
00:22:16.260 going to
00:22:16.380 read the
00:22:16.660 article,
00:22:17.300 but the
00:22:17.640 title's
00:22:18.000 right,
00:22:18.920 that doing
00:22:19.300 your own
00:22:19.700 research is
00:22:20.800 a good way
00:22:21.140 to be
00:22:21.360 wrong.
00:22:21.920 So here's
00:22:22.240 what I
00:22:22.560 said.
00:22:22.820 I said
00:22:24.220 to him,
00:22:25.320 yes,
00:22:25.960 doing your
00:22:26.300 own research
00:22:26.840 is usually,
00:22:28.220 remember,
00:22:28.940 nothing is
00:22:29.940 complete or
00:22:30.660 universal or
00:22:31.480 talks about
00:22:31.980 every situation,
00:22:33.180 but it's
00:22:33.460 usually the
00:22:33.980 worst way to
00:22:34.540 know the
00:22:34.840 truth because
00:22:35.960 our science
00:22:36.540 and our data
00:22:37.020 sources are
00:22:37.700 compromised.
00:22:39.020 All you can
00:22:39.560 do is find
00:22:40.280 the info that
00:22:40.960 agrees with
00:22:41.660 your hunch
00:22:42.240 and ignore
00:22:43.600 anything that
00:22:44.480 disagrees.
00:22:45.280 So in the
00:22:45.660 real world,
00:22:46.460 that's kind
00:22:46.980 of what
00:22:47.220 research is,
00:22:48.580 finding stuff
00:22:49.260 that agrees
00:22:49.720 with you and
00:22:50.220 ignoring the
00:22:50.760 stuff that
00:22:51.100 doesn't.
00:22:52.820 But the
00:22:54.800 problem is
00:22:55.180 sometimes you
00:22:55.860 get one
00:22:56.180 right in a
00:22:57.660 way that you
00:22:58.080 can later
00:22:58.500 confirm is
00:22:59.140 right, and
00:23:00.680 that makes
00:23:01.080 you think
00:23:01.460 that you're
00:23:01.800 good at
00:23:02.060 researching.
00:23:03.440 The worst
00:23:04.160 thing that
00:23:04.500 could happen
00:23:05.060 is doing
00:23:05.540 your own
00:23:05.940 research and
00:23:07.540 then later
00:23:07.980 find out
00:23:08.420 you're right.
00:23:09.720 You know
00:23:10.300 that's the
00:23:10.680 worst thing
00:23:11.080 that could 0.68
00:23:11.320 ever happen
00:23:11.760 to you,
00:23:12.080 right?
00:23:12.800 Doing your
00:23:13.320 own research
00:23:14.140 and later
00:23:15.300 you're proven
00:23:15.840 right.
00:23:17.220 You're in
00:23:17.800 trouble because
00:23:19.500 you're going
00:23:19.780 to think you
00:23:20.460 were right
00:23:20.820 because you
00:23:21.380 did your
00:23:21.700 own research.
00:23:23.440 No.
00:23:25.540 A lot of
00:23:26.220 things are
00:23:26.560 just binary.
00:23:28.340 There are
00:23:28.560 going to be
00:23:28.860 people who
00:23:29.260 say yes,
00:23:29.780 that's true,
00:23:30.300 and people
00:23:30.600 say no,
00:23:31.140 it's not
00:23:31.460 true, and
00:23:32.200 there won't
00:23:32.480 be much
00:23:32.900 in between.
00:23:34.680 Somebody's
00:23:35.100 going to be
00:23:35.400 right, and
00:23:36.400 when they're
00:23:36.800 right, they're
00:23:37.840 going to say
00:23:38.160 it's because
00:23:38.880 they did their
00:23:39.480 own research.
00:23:40.240 Because remember,
00:23:41.380 both sides are
00:23:42.180 doing their
00:23:42.540 own research, but
00:23:44.000 only one of
00:23:44.480 them is going
00:23:44.800 to be right.
00:23:46.460 So how do
00:23:47.060 you explain the
00:23:47.620 other side who
00:23:48.200 also did their
00:23:48.980 own research, but
00:23:50.900 they're wrong?
00:23:52.540 It would be
00:23:53.420 absurd to say
00:23:54.520 that doing
00:23:54.900 your own
00:23:55.240 research is a
00:23:56.000 way to find
00:23:56.460 truth when
00:23:57.740 people doing
00:23:58.300 their own
00:23:58.620 research come
00:23:59.260 to opposite
00:23:59.820 conclusions,
00:24:01.400 permanently.
00:24:02.040 So I went
00:24:06.460 on and I
00:24:06.900 said our
00:24:07.340 experts are
00:24:08.100 corrupt and
00:24:08.680 lying, mostly,
00:24:10.440 they're mostly
00:24:10.960 corrupt and
00:24:11.520 lying, and
00:24:13.520 most of the
00:24:13.980 public still
00:24:14.500 thinks that
00:24:14.980 something called
00:24:15.500 a meta-analysis
00:24:16.420 is valid, and
00:24:18.480 that's just one
00:24:19.000 example.
00:24:19.960 Imagine doing
00:24:20.620 your own
00:24:21.000 research, but
00:24:22.660 you think that
00:24:23.240 meta-analysis is
00:24:24.360 valid.
00:24:25.740 Anything you
00:24:26.340 research would
00:24:26.900 be garbage,
00:24:27.820 because you
00:24:28.220 started with
00:24:29.120 an absurd
00:24:30.420 belief.
00:24:32.040 And then I
00:24:33.420 close with
00:24:34.020 this.
00:24:34.420 Are you
00:24:34.660 ready for
00:24:34.960 this?
00:24:35.920 Here's my
00:24:36.540 kill shot at
00:24:37.360 the end.
00:24:38.620 I said, if I
00:24:40.700 haven't convinced
00:24:41.280 you yet, consider
00:24:42.120 these two facts.
00:24:43.580 Number one,
00:24:44.780 Phil Bump's
00:24:45.420 writing is part
00:24:46.460 of the record
00:24:47.040 of facts.
00:24:49.040 So go do
00:24:49.980 your own
00:24:50.360 research, and
00:24:51.840 then you'll
00:24:52.300 find out that
00:24:52.880 what Phil Bump
00:24:53.700 said is
00:24:54.360 considered facts.
00:24:57.260 So good luck
00:24:58.200 with that.
00:24:58.580 And then
00:24:59.720 number two,
00:25:01.180 literally nothing
00:25:02.320 you have
00:25:02.740 experienced in
00:25:03.620 your own
00:25:04.060 life will be
00:25:05.540 correctly recorded
00:25:06.540 by history, and
00:25:08.300 you can observe
00:25:08.960 that in real
00:25:09.500 time.
00:25:11.440 Have you not
00:25:12.180 noticed?
00:25:13.020 Have you not
00:25:14.020 noticed that we
00:25:14.640 don't agree on
00:25:15.640 what the current
00:25:16.720 situation is?
00:25:18.440 We don't even
00:25:19.360 know if Trump
00:25:20.760 was an
00:25:21.400 insurrectionist
00:25:22.520 or the
00:25:23.580 opposite.
00:25:23.940 it's not
00:25:26.240 like the
00:25:27.820 industry is
00:25:28.240 going to be
00:25:28.520 off by 5%.
00:25:29.740 We can't
00:25:31.320 even tell if
00:25:31.880 he was a
00:25:32.400 patriot or
00:25:33.140 an insurrectionist.
00:25:34.880 I mean, you
00:25:35.440 and I think
00:25:35.920 we can, but
00:25:36.680 everybody else
00:25:37.360 thinks they
00:25:37.740 can as well,
00:25:38.700 and they have
00:25:38.920 different opinions.
00:25:41.560 So if you
00:25:43.500 think that
00:25:44.000 researching helps,
00:25:45.520 just ask
00:25:46.320 yourself how
00:25:47.000 today's history
00:25:47.880 will be written.
00:25:49.240 It couldn't
00:25:50.040 possibly be
00:25:50.960 accurate.
00:25:52.120 There isn't
00:25:52.500 any chance
00:25:53.100 of that.
00:25:53.940 There's no
00:25:55.920 chance of
00:25:56.360 that.
00:25:59.520 All right.
00:26:01.220 Let's talk
00:26:01.900 about David
00:26:02.440 Grush, and
00:26:03.880 he's the
00:26:05.360 whistleblower,
00:26:06.060 says that the
00:26:06.720 government has
00:26:07.560 biologics and
00:26:09.360 spaceships.
00:26:10.560 But, I
00:26:11.920 correct myself,
00:26:13.180 he doesn't
00:26:13.620 say spaceships.
00:26:15.780 And I didn't
00:26:16.320 realize this,
00:26:16.920 I've mentioned
00:26:17.320 this before,
00:26:17.860 but he calls
00:26:18.300 it biologics.
00:26:20.000 So he says
00:26:20.560 they have
00:26:20.820 biologics and
00:26:21.660 they have
00:26:21.900 ships, but 1.00
00:26:23.120 he's not
00:26:23.880 attributing it
00:26:24.620 to outer
00:26:24.960 space.
00:26:26.120 He's also
00:26:26.840 not attributing
00:26:27.580 it to, you
00:26:28.500 know, coming
00:26:29.020 from within
00:26:29.700 the earth or
00:26:30.280 something like
00:26:30.780 that.
00:26:31.400 He calls
00:26:31.940 them interdimensional
00:26:32.980 beings.
00:26:34.460 Now, I had
00:26:35.220 this realization
00:26:35.980 yesterday.
00:26:36.780 I shared with
00:26:37.440 my man
00:26:38.560 cavers on
00:26:39.200 locals, so
00:26:39.860 I'll say it
00:26:40.480 again.
00:26:43.020 And we'll do
00:26:43.920 a little
00:26:44.160 experiment.
00:26:44.720 I did this
00:26:45.160 last night.
00:26:45.760 You're going to
00:26:46.420 enjoy this.
00:26:46.960 In the
00:26:47.740 comments, I
00:26:49.800 want an
00:26:50.220 answer only
00:26:51.040 from the
00:26:51.520 people who
00:26:52.520 have had
00:26:53.000 psychedelic
00:26:53.780 experiences.
00:26:55.260 Mushrooms,
00:26:55.960 LSD, DMT.
00:26:58.460 All right, so
00:26:59.140 everybody else
00:26:59.740 just stay silent
00:27:00.480 just for a
00:27:01.000 moment.
00:27:01.900 I'm going to
00:27:02.140 ask only the
00:27:02.740 people who
00:27:03.040 have had the
00:27:03.380 experiences to
00:27:04.820 answer this
00:27:05.320 question.
00:27:06.360 Do you
00:27:07.080 believe you
00:27:07.620 can identify
00:27:08.580 almost immediately
00:27:09.860 another person
00:27:11.440 who has also
00:27:12.440 had psychedelic
00:27:13.960 experiences?
00:27:14.640 just by
00:27:15.720 looking at
00:27:16.340 them and
00:27:16.700 in five
00:27:17.140 seconds.
00:27:18.420 Look at the
00:27:18.820 comments.
00:27:21.860 It's a wall
00:27:23.000 of yes.
00:27:23.720 A few no's.
00:27:24.600 There's a few
00:27:25.000 no's.
00:27:25.800 But it's a wall
00:27:26.440 of mostly yes.
00:27:29.800 Well over
00:27:30.520 half are yes.
00:27:32.280 Now, I also
00:27:33.000 believe that.
00:27:34.220 I believe that
00:27:34.880 you can tell
00:27:35.340 just by looking
00:27:35.980 at them.
00:27:36.800 And there's
00:27:37.180 something in
00:27:37.600 the eyes.
00:27:39.200 Would you
00:27:39.800 agree?
00:27:40.720 There's
00:27:41.200 something in
00:27:41.760 the eyes.
00:27:43.460 Once your
00:27:44.200 eyes are
00:27:44.960 kind of
00:27:45.900 opened,
00:27:47.240 they always
00:27:47.780 look that
00:27:48.320 way.
00:27:50.460 And I
00:27:51.580 didn't believe
00:27:52.180 that I
00:27:52.860 could really
00:27:53.280 tell.
00:27:54.280 But in
00:27:54.780 my 20s,
00:27:55.500 I started
00:27:55.920 asking.
00:27:57.320 I would
00:27:57.640 actually say,
00:27:58.240 you know
00:27:58.400 what?
00:27:58.660 I just
00:27:59.020 have to
00:27:59.300 ask you
00:27:59.640 this question.
00:28:00.920 Have you
00:28:01.100 ever done
00:28:01.540 psychedelics?
00:28:03.080 Because I
00:28:03.640 had a
00:28:03.940 suspicion.
00:28:05.080 I always
00:28:05.840 get a
00:28:06.120 yes.
00:28:07.360 I don't
00:28:07.820 think I've
00:28:08.180 got one
00:28:08.540 wrong yet
00:28:09.100 in years.
00:28:10.740 Now,
00:28:11.080 sometimes you
00:28:11.660 can tell by
00:28:12.040 the lifestyle
00:28:12.640 as well,
00:28:13.220 so it's not
00:28:13.600 really that
00:28:13.940 hard to
00:28:14.220 guess.
00:28:14.780 But I
00:28:15.220 swear you
00:28:15.700 can tell
00:28:15.960 by looking
00:28:16.300 at their
00:28:16.580 face.
00:28:18.200 Now,
00:28:18.680 are you
00:28:18.920 also aware
00:28:19.580 that
00:28:20.900 interdimensional
00:28:21.800 beings is
00:28:23.620 a common
00:28:24.320 experience for
00:28:25.120 people on
00:28:25.600 DMT?
00:28:26.640 How many
00:28:27.160 of you
00:28:27.400 knew that?
00:28:28.520 That the
00:28:28.880 people who
00:28:29.260 do
00:28:29.460 specifically
00:28:30.200 DMT,
00:28:31.580 they report
00:28:32.380 that they
00:28:32.760 have encounters
00:28:33.480 with creatures
00:28:34.600 which they
00:28:36.140 don't feel
00:28:37.060 are dreams.
00:28:37.820 that they
00:28:39.880 feel they're
00:28:40.420 actually crossing
00:28:41.380 some
00:28:41.820 interdimensional
00:28:42.760 barrier and
00:28:44.100 they're seeing
00:28:44.480 interdimensional
00:28:45.220 beings.
00:28:47.400 Now,
00:28:48.240 put it all
00:28:49.260 together.
00:28:51.080 Take a look
00:28:51.660 at David
00:28:52.080 Grush.
00:28:53.580 Go to
00:28:55.160 your image
00:28:55.760 search.
00:28:56.720 Just look
00:28:57.080 for David
00:28:57.480 Grush.
00:28:58.200 Take a look
00:28:58.700 at his
00:28:59.560 face,
00:29:01.160 his eyes,
00:29:02.380 and you
00:29:02.940 tell me if
00:29:03.420 you think
00:29:03.780 he's ever
00:29:04.320 had a
00:29:04.940 psychedelic
00:29:05.520 experience.
00:29:06.960 Now,
00:29:07.140 I don't
00:29:07.320 know.
00:29:08.540 I'm not
00:29:09.600 saying that
00:29:10.180 I could
00:29:10.460 know from
00:29:11.160 looking at
00:29:11.640 it,
00:29:12.160 but to
00:29:12.640 me,
00:29:13.060 he registers
00:29:13.680 as somebody
00:29:14.500 who's
00:29:15.100 maybe crossed
00:29:16.980 an interdimensional
00:29:17.840 barrier or
00:29:18.580 two.
00:29:20.180 And then
00:29:20.780 you have to
00:29:21.140 ask yourself,
00:29:22.860 has reality
00:29:23.800 and
00:29:24.700 interdimensional
00:29:26.520 awareness
00:29:27.580 merged with
00:29:29.560 some people?
00:29:30.720 Are there
00:29:31.180 some people
00:29:31.700 who can live
00:29:32.320 forever in
00:29:32.940 both worlds
00:29:33.580 having visited
00:29:34.920 the other
00:29:35.340 world once?
00:29:36.940 I don't
00:29:37.540 know.
00:29:38.380 I feel
00:29:38.780 like it's
00:29:39.540 a little
00:29:39.840 bit yes.
00:29:42.060 So I
00:29:42.740 would like
00:29:43.040 to at
00:29:43.660 least put
00:29:44.340 out there
00:29:44.900 that one
00:29:46.440 answer to
00:29:47.320 these
00:29:47.800 biologics,
00:29:49.360 the biologics
00:29:50.220 I think are
00:29:50.720 just some
00:29:51.520 contamination,
00:29:52.340 they haven't
00:29:52.600 figured out
00:29:53.020 what it is,
00:29:54.040 and I don't
00:29:55.520 think there's
00:29:55.920 necessarily any
00:29:56.680 ships,
00:29:57.500 but I do
00:29:58.040 believe that
00:29:58.580 people who
00:29:59.440 are sure
00:30:01.700 that there
00:30:02.200 are some
00:30:02.860 kind of
00:30:03.180 interdimensional
00:30:03.800 beings,
00:30:04.920 would far
00:30:06.160 more likely
00:30:06.820 to have
00:30:07.680 had a
00:30:08.400 psychedelic
00:30:09.020 experience,
00:30:10.460 and I
00:30:11.080 don't think
00:30:11.460 it's
00:30:11.660 unconnected.
00:30:13.200 So I'm
00:30:13.660 just going
00:30:13.940 to put
00:30:14.100 that out
00:30:14.460 there.
00:30:15.180 Yeah,
00:30:15.360 Mike
00:30:15.520 Cernovich
00:30:15.840 would be
00:30:16.240 one to
00:30:16.760 consult on
00:30:17.700 this topic.
00:30:19.920 I just
00:30:20.520 put it
00:30:20.780 out there
00:30:21.160 that I'd
00:30:21.760 love someone
00:30:22.260 to ask
00:30:22.840 him if
00:30:23.200 he's ever
00:30:23.580 had a
00:30:24.240 psychedelic
00:30:24.820 experience,
00:30:26.120 and I'm
00:30:26.360 not,
00:30:26.740 you know,
00:30:27.140 again,
00:30:27.360 I'm not
00:30:27.620 judging him.
00:30:28.600 I want
00:30:28.860 to make
00:30:29.080 sure that's
00:30:29.860 coming across.
00:30:30.860 I'm not
00:30:31.200 judging him.
00:30:32.640 I'm saying,
00:30:33.300 wouldn't you
00:30:33.560 like to know
00:30:34.020 that?
00:30:34.980 That feels
00:30:35.620 like an
00:30:35.940 important thing
00:30:37.500 to ask,
00:30:37.980 and I wouldn't
00:30:38.740 trust Congress
00:30:39.860 to ask the
00:30:40.360 question.
00:30:41.060 So maybe
00:30:41.420 there'll be
00:30:41.720 some podcaster
00:30:42.520 who someday
00:30:43.140 asks him
00:30:43.500 that.
00:30:44.340 All right,
00:30:44.560 here's another
00:30:44.980 funny thing.
00:30:45.800 Do you know
00:30:46.180 what Phil
00:30:46.860 Bump's
00:30:47.260 wife's
00:30:47.840 first name
00:30:48.340 is?
00:30:49.920 China.
00:30:51.580 Her first
00:30:52.380 name is
00:30:52.700 China.
00:30:54.460 Yeah.
00:30:55.180 So this
00:30:56.360 is a real
00:30:56.760 thing.
00:30:58.380 So Phil
00:30:59.200 Bump once
00:30:59.780 wrote a
00:31:00.140 story about
00:31:01.660 DeSantis
00:31:04.980 criticizing
00:31:05.720 China too
00:31:06.340 much.
00:31:08.720 He was
00:31:09.400 trying to
00:31:09.700 give China 0.98
00:31:10.160 a little
00:31:10.440 bump.
00:31:11.640 Now that's
00:31:12.020 pure
00:31:12.300 simulation.
00:31:12.980 How in
00:31:14.040 the world
00:31:14.520 is Phil
00:31:15.340 Bump's
00:31:15.720 wife named
00:31:16.300 China? 0.73
00:31:17.260 China Bump. 0.85
00:31:19.660 That just
00:31:20.360 feels like
00:31:20.740 too big of
00:31:21.220 a coincidence.
00:31:23.600 Yeah,
00:31:23.940 I think she
00:31:24.660 spells it
00:31:25.200 with an I
00:31:26.100 not a Y 0.97
00:31:26.760 actually.
00:31:28.240 So even
00:31:29.260 more
00:31:29.620 entertaining.
00:31:31.180 Well,
00:31:31.940 now more
00:31:32.660 of what I
00:31:33.200 call
00:31:33.540 backwards
00:31:35.040 science.
00:31:37.340 Backwards
00:31:37.940 science.
00:31:39.300 There is
00:31:42.360 a study
00:31:42.880 that says
00:31:43.320 that people
00:31:43.800 who can
00:31:44.260 dance are
00:31:45.820 generally more
00:31:46.540 capable at
00:31:47.280 work.
00:31:48.920 Good
00:31:49.600 dancers are
00:31:50.700 more capable
00:31:51.340 at work and
00:31:52.900 they have
00:31:53.200 better attendance.
00:31:54.880 Huh.
00:31:56.320 Let's see.
00:31:58.100 What could
00:31:58.820 be behind
00:31:59.280 that?
00:32:00.800 So people
00:32:01.480 whose bodies
00:32:02.360 work so
00:32:03.400 well that
00:32:04.060 they can
00:32:04.480 dance have
00:32:06.800 better
00:32:07.200 attendance,
00:32:08.100 less
00:32:08.300 absenteeism,
00:32:09.300 than people
00:32:10.260 who can't
00:32:11.020 walk and
00:32:12.960 can't dance.
00:32:15.220 I feel
00:32:16.180 like dancing
00:32:16.960 is a signal
00:32:18.660 of good
00:32:19.220 health.
00:32:21.360 And dancing
00:32:22.240 well is a
00:32:23.640 signal of
00:32:24.180 probably genetic
00:32:25.080 quality, I
00:32:27.140 would think.
00:32:27.860 Now, I'm a
00:32:28.460 poor dancer, so 1.00
00:32:29.380 I don't mind
00:32:30.040 saying that other
00:32:30.820 people who can
00:32:31.540 dance probably
00:32:32.900 have some
00:32:33.460 genetic extra
00:32:34.860 thing I don't
00:32:35.460 have.
00:32:38.020 Right.
00:32:39.300 hockey players
00:32:42.600 can skate
00:32:43.380 better than
00:32:43.820 they dance.
00:32:44.420 Okay.
00:32:47.560 All right.
00:32:48.220 Well, there
00:32:48.600 might be, you
00:32:49.220 know, there's
00:32:49.540 also something
00:32:50.420 to exercise
00:32:51.460 is going to
00:32:52.380 make you
00:32:52.960 more capable
00:32:53.740 as well.
00:32:54.380 So maybe if
00:32:55.380 you were to
00:32:55.760 start dancing
00:32:56.540 when you
00:32:56.920 didn't dance
00:32:57.440 before, the
00:32:58.520 exercise would
00:32:59.300 also make you
00:33:00.240 a better
00:33:00.520 employee.
00:33:01.380 That would be
00:33:02.160 true, just
00:33:02.780 any form of
00:33:03.440 exercise.
00:33:04.180 But I would
00:33:04.960 look for the
00:33:05.520 backwards part of
00:33:06.360 this story.
00:33:06.780 I think
00:33:07.140 healthy people
00:33:07.860 probably just
00:33:08.400 do better in
00:33:08.960 general.
00:33:10.880 Let's do an
00:33:11.740 update on
00:33:12.220 Axios propaganda.
00:33:14.700 Axios propaganda.
00:33:17.000 It's so common,
00:33:18.340 I'm going to
00:33:18.820 give it its own
00:33:20.040 theme.
00:33:21.820 And they say,
00:33:23.200 listen, they
00:33:24.180 actually say
00:33:24.820 this.
00:33:25.820 See if you can
00:33:26.480 tell the
00:33:26.800 difference between
00:33:27.560 this and a
00:33:29.040 Babylon Bee
00:33:29.900 satire.
00:33:33.480 All right.
00:33:33.880 I swear I'm
00:33:34.780 not making this
00:33:35.500 up.
00:33:36.400 This is an
00:33:36.960 Axios post
00:33:38.160 teasing their
00:33:39.660 article.
00:33:40.780 It says,
00:33:41.320 Trump supporters
00:33:41.980 cite his
00:33:43.100 economic record
00:33:43.960 as a reason
00:33:44.480 to vote for
00:33:44.960 him.
00:33:45.560 But that's a
00:33:46.260 bit puzzling
00:33:47.040 because his
00:33:48.060 economic record
00:33:49.040 is only good
00:33:50.000 if you leave
00:33:50.640 off what
00:33:51.160 happened from
00:33:52.260 March 2020
00:33:53.680 to the end
00:33:55.440 of his
00:33:55.700 administration.
00:33:58.740 March 2020.
00:34:00.660 Was there
00:34:01.320 anything happening
00:34:02.420 in March 2020?
00:34:03.900 Oh, the
00:34:05.660 pandemic started.
00:34:08.160 That's right.
00:34:09.280 Axios is
00:34:10.080 telling its
00:34:10.600 dumb fuck
00:34:11.220 readers that
00:34:13.200 Trump is
00:34:14.460 responsible for
00:34:15.380 the economic
00:34:16.020 downturn of
00:34:17.720 the pandemic.
00:34:22.300 Seriously,
00:34:23.240 Axios?
00:34:24.740 I am not
00:34:25.760 going to read
00:34:26.160 that article.
00:34:27.560 Reading just
00:34:28.500 the tease of
00:34:30.520 the article was
00:34:31.180 all I needed
00:34:31.880 to know that
00:34:32.540 it's basically
00:34:33.340 Babylon being 0.95
00:34:34.100 material.
00:34:36.960 Well,
00:34:37.620 Jonathan Turley
00:34:38.620 continues to
00:34:39.520 report on
00:34:41.360 Hunter Biden's
00:34:43.520 legal woes.
00:34:45.300 And so
00:34:46.140 here's the
00:34:46.520 latest thing.
00:34:49.360 So, you know,
00:34:50.820 Hunter Biden's
00:34:51.440 in trouble for
00:34:52.100 having a gun
00:34:52.880 in which he
00:34:54.120 allegedly lied
00:34:55.120 on his gun
00:34:55.760 application to
00:34:56.780 say that he
00:34:57.200 was not drug
00:34:57.920 addicted.
00:34:58.300 Now, part
00:34:59.840 of the
00:35:00.080 defense is
00:35:01.440 that there's
00:35:02.000 no way to
00:35:02.520 know he
00:35:02.840 was drug
00:35:03.300 addicted at
00:35:04.740 the time he
00:35:06.500 bought the
00:35:06.900 gun.
00:35:09.040 Now, this
00:35:09.840 sort of
00:35:10.280 challenges the
00:35:11.600 question of
00:35:12.100 what addiction
00:35:12.640 is, and
00:35:14.060 every single
00:35:15.060 medical expert
00:35:15.920 I've ever heard
00:35:16.600 of says there's
00:35:17.800 no such thing
00:35:18.560 as getting
00:35:19.840 better.
00:35:21.180 You're always
00:35:21.780 an addict.
00:35:22.960 You might not
00:35:23.540 be using.
00:35:25.100 Yeah, we
00:35:25.740 should make
00:35:26.300 that distinction.
00:35:26.940 You could be
00:35:27.840 an addict
00:35:28.360 who's not
00:35:28.860 using, but
00:35:30.320 you're not
00:35:30.760 an addict.
00:35:32.200 So I'm not
00:35:32.840 sure exactly
00:35:33.520 how that
00:35:34.620 question is
00:35:35.240 phrased on
00:35:35.900 the gun
00:35:36.620 application.
00:35:37.920 But the
00:35:38.680 argument would
00:35:39.260 be that he
00:35:39.680 wasn't using
00:35:40.420 at the time
00:35:40.900 he got the
00:35:41.360 gun.
00:35:42.440 The problem
00:35:43.180 with that,
00:35:43.980 it's going to
00:35:44.520 be a little
00:35:44.860 awkward, the
00:35:46.280 pouch that
00:35:47.100 the gun was
00:35:47.760 found in,
00:35:48.820 and I guess
00:35:49.280 the widow
00:35:51.420 of his
00:35:52.320 brother that
00:35:53.940 he was dating
00:35:54.500 is the one
00:35:54.860 who threw
00:35:55.120 it in the
00:35:55.460 garbage.
00:35:56.940 It was,
00:35:58.180 the pouch
00:35:58.700 was covered
00:35:59.160 in cocaine.
00:36:01.920 So that's
00:36:03.840 going to
00:36:04.080 hurt his
00:36:04.540 I wasn't
00:36:05.100 doing drugs
00:36:05.800 at the time
00:36:06.380 I owned
00:36:06.740 the gun.
00:36:07.540 I was just
00:36:08.400 rolling the
00:36:09.120 pouch in
00:36:10.800 cocaine.
00:36:12.080 Did you put
00:36:12.880 any of the
00:36:13.180 cocaine in
00:36:13.700 your body?
00:36:14.420 No, I
00:36:15.860 wasn't using
00:36:16.460 that.
00:36:17.160 I was just
00:36:17.820 rolling my
00:36:18.400 gun pouch
00:36:18.980 in cocaine.
00:36:20.180 Well, why
00:36:20.940 were you doing
00:36:21.480 that?
00:36:22.280 Can you explain
00:36:23.340 why you were
00:36:24.040 rolling your
00:36:24.520 gun pouch in
00:36:25.360 cocaine if you
00:36:26.100 weren't using
00:36:26.560 cocaine?
00:36:27.760 And then you
00:36:28.280 know what the
00:36:28.600 right answer
00:36:29.060 would be?
00:36:30.200 Here's the
00:36:30.760 correct answer
00:36:31.340 to that
00:36:31.580 question.
00:36:33.380 With all
00:36:34.040 due respect to
00:36:34.800 the court,
00:36:36.060 there's nothing
00:36:37.180 I did for
00:36:37.700 five years that
00:36:38.440 made any
00:36:38.880 fucking sense.
00:36:41.200 No further
00:36:41.880 questions.
00:36:44.880 The addict
00:36:46.040 defense is
00:36:47.620 pretty strong,
00:36:48.880 you know,
00:36:49.180 except if he's
00:36:50.020 an addict, he
00:36:50.560 goes to jail in
00:36:51.280 this case.
00:36:52.360 But if,
00:36:54.600 anyway, I
00:36:55.920 guess you
00:36:56.160 made that
00:36:56.420 point.
00:36:58.660 So I
00:37:00.220 continue to
00:37:00.860 say that I
00:37:01.580 am not
00:37:02.000 anti-Hunter
00:37:02.840 Biden on
00:37:03.580 the gun
00:37:03.960 question.
00:37:05.460 If he broke
00:37:06.300 a law, I
00:37:07.020 suppose the
00:37:07.640 system has to
00:37:09.480 do what it
00:37:09.740 has to do.
00:37:10.560 But I'm
00:37:11.300 not, I'm
00:37:12.980 just too
00:37:13.480 pro-Second
00:37:14.260 Amendment to
00:37:15.620 think that you
00:37:16.200 can't have a
00:37:16.740 gun because
00:37:17.160 you're an
00:37:17.520 addict.
00:37:17.820 So I
00:37:19.280 guess I
00:37:19.620 disagree with
00:37:20.620 the law
00:37:21.040 more than I
00:37:21.640 disagree with
00:37:22.260 the hunter.
00:37:23.960 I understand
00:37:24.820 the law.
00:37:25.460 I understand
00:37:25.880 why it's
00:37:26.220 there.
00:37:26.940 But I'm
00:37:28.500 not comfortable
00:37:28.960 with it.
00:37:30.100 Well,
00:37:32.160 Iran and
00:37:33.540 Pakistan are 1.00
00:37:34.380 at war.
00:37:37.000 But I
00:37:37.640 don't think
00:37:37.960 you have to
00:37:38.260 worry about
00:37:38.640 this one.
00:37:40.720 So
00:37:41.240 apparently
00:37:41.680 Pakistan Air
00:37:43.840 Force launched
00:37:44.520 a strike on
00:37:45.260 Iran because 0.97
00:37:46.640 Iran had 0.99
00:37:47.300 launched a
00:37:47.800 strike on
00:37:48.440 Pakistan.
00:37:49.320 But it
00:37:49.960 wasn't the
00:37:50.440 governments
00:37:50.880 fighting each
00:37:51.480 other.
00:37:51.840 Here's the
00:37:52.200 weirdest part
00:37:52.660 of the story.
00:37:53.720 They were
00:37:54.060 both attacking
00:37:54.820 the same
00:37:55.300 group but
00:37:56.400 in different
00:37:56.860 countries.
00:37:58.660 So apparently
00:37:59.160 there's this
00:37:59.860 group called
00:38:00.940 the Balush.
00:38:02.760 I guess it's
00:38:03.360 a separate
00:38:03.820 ethnicity.
00:38:04.980 They exist
00:38:05.560 both in
00:38:06.060 Iran as
00:38:06.960 militant
00:38:07.440 groups and
00:38:09.000 in Pakistan.
00:38:10.520 So Iran 0.96
00:38:11.460 attacked the
00:38:13.260 Balush
00:38:13.720 militants in
00:38:14.580 Pakistan and
00:38:16.140 then in
00:38:16.520 response,
00:38:17.140 the
00:38:18.180 Pakistanis 0.80
00:38:19.060 retaliated by
00:38:20.700 attacking the
00:38:21.380 Balush
00:38:21.740 militants in
00:38:22.720 Iran.
00:38:26.260 So is
00:38:28.820 this likely
00:38:29.480 to escalate
00:38:30.680 into a
00:38:31.280 big war
00:38:31.800 when it's
00:38:32.620 two countries
00:38:33.360 who both
00:38:33.820 want to kill
00:38:34.260 these Balush
00:38:34.920 militant groups?
00:38:36.880 I feel like
00:38:37.920 it's just two
00:38:38.420 countries that
00:38:39.060 want to kill
00:38:39.960 the same
00:38:40.340 bunch of
00:38:40.860 people.
00:38:41.780 Because who
00:38:42.640 wants a
00:38:43.060 militant group?
00:38:43.880 So if
00:38:45.680 you're worried
00:38:46.080 that this
00:38:46.460 is going
00:38:46.740 to escalate,
00:38:47.540 I don't
00:38:47.780 see how
00:38:48.160 it could.
00:38:49.360 They basically
00:38:50.020 are agreeing
00:38:50.620 with each
00:38:51.000 other.
00:38:51.900 Of course,
00:38:53.060 they don't
00:38:53.400 like that
00:38:53.900 their sovereignty
00:38:55.120 is being
00:38:55.780 penetrated.
00:38:57.540 But they
00:38:58.580 don't really
00:38:58.960 give a shit
00:38:59.400 about the
00:38:59.840 Balush
00:39:00.240 militants,
00:39:00.940 I don't
00:39:01.200 think.
00:39:02.340 So I don't
00:39:02.920 think this
00:39:03.360 has really
00:39:03.960 the potential
00:39:04.540 to blow 0.56
00:39:05.060 up because
00:39:05.900 it's not
00:39:06.240 starting as
00:39:06.940 something that's
00:39:07.540 likely to
00:39:08.120 escalate.
00:39:08.500 now there
00:39:09.420 might be
00:39:10.020 more bombs
00:39:11.020 going back
00:39:11.560 and forth,
00:39:12.240 but it
00:39:12.720 doesn't look
00:39:13.140 like they're
00:39:13.480 going to
00:39:13.640 land in
00:39:14.060 Toronto.
00:39:15.260 It looks
00:39:16.300 like they're
00:39:16.620 going to
00:39:17.180 just target
00:39:17.780 these groups.
00:39:20.320 So James
00:39:23.480 O'Keefe
00:39:23.920 found this
00:39:24.440 big facility
00:39:27.060 down by the
00:39:28.000 border called
00:39:28.620 Elitis,
00:39:29.480 and it's
00:39:30.440 funded by
00:39:31.480 a shadowy
00:39:32.380 group of
00:39:33.140 people that
00:39:35.580 it's hard to
00:39:36.360 know where
00:39:36.680 their money
00:39:37.060 is coming
00:39:37.440 from,
00:39:37.760 but some
00:39:38.740 of it
00:39:39.040 allegedly
00:39:39.460 comes from
00:39:39.960 the U.S.
00:39:40.340 government.
00:39:41.200 And they're
00:39:41.540 there to
00:39:42.040 process all
00:39:42.900 of the
00:39:43.360 immigrants
00:39:44.580 coming in.
00:39:47.300 And
00:39:47.860 everything
00:39:48.220 about it
00:39:48.780 is freaking
00:39:49.320 sketchy.
00:39:51.140 It's just
00:39:51.540 all sketchy.
00:39:53.540 Everything
00:39:53.880 at the border
00:39:54.500 doesn't make
00:39:55.080 sense.
00:39:56.200 And now
00:39:56.480 Schumer is
00:39:57.120 saying that
00:39:58.160 they don't
00:39:58.500 want to do
00:39:58.900 a border
00:39:59.400 deal unless
00:40:01.580 they get
00:40:01.900 $60 billion
00:40:02.640 for Ukraine.
00:40:04.440 How is
00:40:05.160 that not
00:40:05.780 a traitor?
00:40:07.760 He literally
00:40:10.980 wants to
00:40:11.520 spend $60
00:40:12.620 billion while
00:40:13.940 our border
00:40:14.520 is open.
00:40:16.500 Now, I
00:40:17.220 get that
00:40:18.480 Congress does
00:40:19.580 this horse
00:40:20.180 trading as
00:40:21.320 part of the
00:40:21.720 process, and
00:40:22.420 maybe you
00:40:22.840 wouldn't even
00:40:23.180 want to change
00:40:23.900 that part of
00:40:24.320 the process
00:40:24.820 because it's
00:40:25.660 the only way
00:40:26.080 anything can
00:40:26.660 get done.
00:40:27.420 You have to
00:40:27.980 bribe people 1.00
00:40:28.800 and give
00:40:29.800 them pork 0.99
00:40:30.320 and promise
00:40:31.080 them things.
00:40:32.000 It's an ugly
00:40:32.740 process.
00:40:33.220 But when
00:40:35.240 the border
00:40:35.780 is wide
00:40:36.500 open, is
00:40:38.580 that the
00:40:38.980 same as
00:40:40.220 other
00:40:40.580 problems?
00:40:41.860 Is that
00:40:42.200 like the
00:40:42.520 budget where
00:40:43.220 you're like,
00:40:43.940 oh, I'd
00:40:44.500 like to
00:40:45.060 print more
00:40:46.880 flags, and
00:40:48.200 I'd like to
00:40:49.660 fix this
00:40:50.740 beach, and
00:40:51.680 then you make
00:40:52.120 a deal.
00:40:52.800 I like
00:40:53.300 flags, you
00:40:53.860 like beaches,
00:40:54.540 let's make
00:40:54.880 a deal.
00:40:55.680 That's not
00:40:56.300 like this.
00:40:57.360 Our country
00:40:57.920 is being
00:40:58.460 like literally
00:40:59.600 invaded by
00:41:00.540 millions of
00:41:02.080 military-age
00:41:04.200 males from
00:41:05.900 countries that
00:41:06.560 are not all
00:41:07.280 our friends.
00:41:09.780 I mean,
00:41:10.040 they're literally
00:41:10.660 coming from
00:41:11.240 countries where
00:41:11.920 rape is a 1.00
00:41:12.580 national sport
00:41:13.600 by the
00:41:14.960 millions.
00:41:16.560 So I
00:41:18.400 would say
00:41:18.840 that Schumer,
00:41:20.200 I understand
00:41:20.700 he has to
00:41:21.120 do his
00:41:21.340 political thing
00:41:22.120 because he's
00:41:22.520 a political
00:41:23.000 animal, but
00:41:24.280 this is
00:41:25.580 legitimately
00:41:26.160 traitorous.
00:41:26.920 do you
00:41:28.220 agree?
00:41:30.180 Like, I
00:41:30.700 feel like,
00:41:31.940 or treason
00:41:32.740 or something,
00:41:34.200 to put
00:41:35.400 another country
00:41:36.340 so much
00:41:37.440 ahead of
00:41:37.940 your own
00:41:38.520 citizens,
00:41:39.800 this is not
00:41:41.160 business as
00:41:41.840 usual.
00:41:43.000 This is not
00:41:43.620 like picking
00:41:44.480 the national
00:41:45.100 fucking bird, 0.99
00:41:47.380 right?
00:41:47.820 He's treating
00:41:48.360 this like it's
00:41:48.980 almost like a
00:41:50.480 detail or
00:41:51.140 something, like
00:41:51.920 a budget.
00:41:52.580 It's a budget
00:41:53.220 conversation.
00:41:53.820 It's not a
00:41:54.240 budget conversation.
00:41:55.300 It's not.
00:41:57.520 I mean, it is,
00:41:58.360 but it's not
00:41:58.960 about the
00:41:59.360 budget.
00:41:59.860 It's literally
00:42:00.440 national defense.
00:42:01.780 He's acting
00:42:02.280 like it's
00:42:02.680 negotiable.
00:42:04.040 No, national
00:42:04.620 defense should
00:42:05.220 never be
00:42:05.620 negotiable.
00:42:07.800 Now, I
00:42:08.600 get that
00:42:09.860 their argument
00:42:10.360 would be that
00:42:10.940 Ukraine also
00:42:11.700 has a national
00:42:12.480 defense element
00:42:13.380 to it.
00:42:14.520 So vote for
00:42:15.440 it separately.
00:42:16.500 If you can
00:42:17.300 make your
00:42:17.700 argument for
00:42:18.280 Ukraine, go
00:42:20.140 make it.
00:42:20.640 But if
00:42:22.220 you can't
00:42:22.760 make the
00:42:23.080 argument without
00:42:24.000 tying it to
00:42:25.640 an unrelated
00:42:26.220 thing, that
00:42:27.660 means you
00:42:28.000 don't have an
00:42:28.660 argument and
00:42:29.260 you shouldn't
00:42:29.660 be asking for
00:42:30.300 your 60
00:42:30.820 billion.
00:42:32.000 So, I
00:42:34.640 don't know.
00:42:35.040 This strikes
00:42:35.780 me as either
00:42:37.660 a clear symbol
00:42:38.680 of corruption.
00:42:39.900 Well, that's
00:42:40.320 what it is.
00:42:41.020 It's a clear
00:42:41.580 symbol of, it's
00:42:43.180 a sign of
00:42:43.780 corruption.
00:42:45.120 Because it
00:42:45.820 can't be
00:42:46.260 explained under
00:42:47.120 normal circumstances.
00:42:48.340 If you take
00:42:50.220 out the
00:42:50.600 variable that
00:42:51.300 he might be
00:42:51.860 blackmailed or
00:42:52.680 bought, it
00:42:53.880 doesn't make
00:42:54.360 any sense.
00:42:55.540 Does it?
00:42:56.700 Explain it
00:42:57.500 outside the
00:42:58.180 context of
00:42:58.800 being bought.
00:43:00.420 I don't see
00:43:01.020 any explanation
00:43:01.740 for this
00:43:02.160 behavior.
00:43:03.040 I see no
00:43:03.600 explanation for
00:43:04.420 it.
00:43:07.080 All right.
00:43:09.940 Kamala Harris
00:43:10.580 says there's no
00:43:11.320 denying America
00:43:12.220 has a history
00:43:12.960 of racism.
00:43:14.200 Do we agree?
00:43:15.780 Does America
00:43:16.380 have a history
00:43:17.120 of racism?
00:43:18.340 Because there's
00:43:19.340 some Republicans
00:43:20.380 who are saying,
00:43:21.060 no, we're not
00:43:21.620 a racist country.
00:43:23.320 I think DeSantis
00:43:24.000 and maybe
00:43:25.640 Nikki Haley
00:43:26.200 said that.
00:43:26.780 Maybe if a
00:43:27.220 fake said it,
00:43:27.780 I don't know.
00:43:28.460 But a lot of
00:43:29.160 Republicans say
00:43:30.360 it.
00:43:31.080 We're not a
00:43:31.940 racist country.
00:43:32.680 Of course we're
00:43:33.280 a racist country.
00:43:36.520 And the thing
00:43:37.440 I wonder is,
00:43:39.400 do you think
00:43:40.260 the Democrats
00:43:40.860 know that
00:43:41.640 they're the
00:43:42.000 racists?
00:43:43.760 Now, they're
00:43:44.360 not the only
00:43:44.980 racists.
00:43:45.680 There are plenty
00:43:46.240 of Republican
00:43:46.780 racists.
00:43:47.260 But do you
00:43:48.140 think they
00:43:48.420 know?
00:43:49.700 Because here's
00:43:50.300 what I was
00:43:50.620 wondering.
00:43:51.560 If you could
00:43:52.180 go back in
00:43:52.760 time and talk
00:43:53.420 to the plantation
00:43:54.480 owners while
00:43:55.700 they currently
00:43:56.440 were running
00:43:56.960 plantations with
00:43:57.880 slaves, do you 0.98
00:43:59.340 think they would
00:43:59.840 have said,
00:44:00.320 you know, we
00:44:01.180 know we're
00:44:01.620 being evil?
00:44:03.000 Yeah, no, we
00:44:03.640 know it.
00:44:04.200 We know it.
00:44:05.440 We're totally
00:44:05.920 being evil.
00:44:06.560 We know it.
00:44:06.980 We're trying to
00:44:07.340 get away with it
00:44:08.120 because it's
00:44:08.900 really good for
00:44:09.520 us.
00:44:10.180 Like we're making
00:44:10.920 a ton of money.
00:44:12.400 But we know
00:44:13.020 we're being evil.
00:44:14.140 Do you think
00:44:14.500 they would have
00:44:14.820 said that?
00:44:15.240 Not a chance.
00:44:17.800 They would have
00:44:18.240 said, like I'm
00:44:20.020 no historian, but I
00:44:21.660 know what a human
00:44:22.280 being is.
00:44:23.420 So let me explain
00:44:24.180 how a human being
00:44:25.060 would act in that
00:44:25.880 situation every
00:44:27.240 time.
00:44:28.420 Evil?
00:44:29.340 Are you kidding
00:44:30.120 me?
00:44:30.900 You should see
00:44:31.440 what their life
00:44:32.000 would be like if
00:44:32.680 they were in
00:44:32.980 Africa, right?
00:44:35.020 I'm so kind to
00:44:36.100 them.
00:44:36.460 I give them food
00:44:37.840 and shelter.
00:44:38.780 If I were to
00:44:39.340 free them, they'd
00:44:39.980 starve to death.
00:44:40.640 So I'm really
00:44:43.040 almost like a
00:44:44.540 father figure.
00:44:45.420 I mean, it's
00:44:46.000 tough love, sure. 0.97
00:44:47.100 They're slaves.
00:44:48.220 But how much
00:44:49.760 better their life
00:44:50.520 is.
00:44:50.780 Don't you think
00:44:51.180 a plantation
00:44:51.820 owner would have
00:44:53.400 actually believed
00:44:54.240 their own story,
00:44:55.660 no matter how
00:44:56.740 ridiculous it looks
00:44:57.700 from today's
00:44:58.400 perspective?
00:44:59.320 They would have
00:44:59.780 believed it then.
00:45:01.480 So Kamala Harris
00:45:02.220 is no different.
00:45:03.500 She is the
00:45:04.200 racist.
00:45:05.980 We do have a
00:45:06.940 racist country,
00:45:08.020 but she's not 0.62
00:45:08.980 aware she's the
00:45:09.660 perpetrator.
00:45:11.700 Now, let me
00:45:12.380 give you some
00:45:12.840 examples.
00:45:14.240 Today we learned
00:45:15.020 that Daniel
00:45:16.260 Penny, the
00:45:17.120 Marine veteran
00:45:18.080 who accidentally
00:45:19.960 killed a guy on
00:45:21.040 a subway trying
00:45:21.740 to keep that
00:45:22.260 guy from maybe
00:45:22.960 hurting other
00:45:23.460 people, the
00:45:26.140 judge has
00:45:26.800 denied the
00:45:27.880 request to
00:45:28.460 dismiss it, and
00:45:29.800 he's got a
00:45:30.260 $200,000 bail in
00:45:32.900 New York City
00:45:33.680 where nothing is
00:45:35.040 a crime, unless
00:45:36.420 you're a white 0.98
00:45:36.860 guy.
00:45:37.120 So there's
00:45:39.600 nobody in the
00:45:40.160 world, well, let
00:45:41.480 me test you, is
00:45:42.340 there even one
00:45:42.900 person watching
00:45:43.700 who believes that
00:45:45.100 a black man, if
00:45:46.820 he'd been in the
00:45:47.420 same situation as
00:45:48.360 Daniel Penny, do
00:45:49.840 you believe a black 0.63
00:45:50.620 man would be
00:45:51.720 prosecuted for what
00:45:53.660 everybody can see
00:45:54.720 was not a murder?
00:45:57.060 I mean, it's on
00:45:57.500 video, you can see
00:45:58.420 for yourself, it's
00:45:59.340 obviously not
00:46:00.020 murder.
00:46:01.220 No, nobody
00:46:02.120 believes that a
00:46:02.780 black man would be 0.96
00:46:03.620 prosecuted for this
00:46:04.480 crime.
00:46:04.760 So Kamala, you're 0.88
00:46:06.120 right, we do
00:46:07.500 have a racist
00:46:08.100 history that
00:46:08.780 includes, you
00:46:10.120 know, yesterday.
00:46:12.300 Your racist
00:46:13.080 history includes
00:46:14.080 checking yesterday,
00:46:16.980 and today's not
00:46:18.380 looking good,
00:46:19.020 frankly.
00:46:20.220 Yesterday we were
00:46:21.200 racist, literally
00:46:21.940 yesterday, but I'm
00:46:23.820 not feeling good
00:46:24.400 about today.
00:46:25.480 I feel like there
00:46:26.480 might be more of
00:46:27.140 it today.
00:46:29.660 All right.
00:46:30.080 here's a little
00:46:33.560 more.
00:46:34.240 So there's an
00:46:34.760 account I follow
00:46:36.120 on X called
00:46:37.500 Amuse.
00:46:38.340 I talk about it
00:46:38.980 a lot.
00:46:39.340 It's a good
00:46:39.680 follow.
00:46:41.020 So look for
00:46:41.600 at Amuse.
00:46:43.220 Now I'm just
00:46:43.880 going to read
00:46:44.540 what Amuse
00:46:45.500 said about
00:46:49.720 trying to get
00:46:50.400 a job.
00:46:51.420 So Amuse was
00:46:52.360 doing a phone
00:46:53.340 interview for a
00:46:54.740 new job in a
00:46:55.800 tech position.
00:46:57.320 And here's
00:46:59.480 what he said.
00:47:01.420 I'm in the
00:47:01.720 market for a
00:47:02.240 new job, and I
00:47:02.880 was referred to
00:47:03.640 a startup that
00:47:04.340 has raised half
00:47:06.080 a billion dollars
00:47:06.800 in venture
00:47:07.440 capital regarding
00:47:08.820 a CRO position.
00:47:10.720 It is a great
00:47:11.400 fit based on my
00:47:12.240 background.
00:47:12.680 The first
00:47:13.020 question the
00:47:13.540 HR person asked
00:47:14.460 was about my
00:47:15.440 identity.
00:47:16.900 They need a
00:47:17.520 quote, diverse
00:47:18.100 candidate.
00:47:18.980 When I explained
00:47:19.680 I was a straight
00:47:20.940 white male, I
00:47:22.080 was told that I
00:47:22.760 didn't meet their
00:47:23.600 requirements.
00:47:25.040 Without any
00:47:25.820 hesitancy, the
00:47:26.780 hiring representation
00:47:27.300 representative explained
00:47:28.300 they had a mandate
00:47:29.540 to only consider
00:47:31.580 candidates that
00:47:33.780 were people of
00:47:34.400 color and or
00:47:35.040 members of the
00:47:35.720 LGBTQ community.
00:47:37.480 In the old
00:47:38.020 days, the HR
00:47:38.840 department would
00:47:39.600 at least pretend
00:47:40.440 they weren't
00:47:40.900 engaging in
00:47:41.540 illegal hiring
00:47:42.320 practices.
00:47:43.520 Today, they
00:47:43.980 don't even seem
00:47:44.580 to realize what
00:47:46.340 they are doing is
00:47:47.020 a violation of
00:47:47.760 the law.
00:47:49.720 Plantation
00:47:50.200 owners.
00:47:51.520 I previously
00:47:52.360 joked that I
00:47:53.420 was going to
00:47:53.820 become a
00:47:54.220 non-binary so 0.71
00:47:55.140 that I'd qualify
00:47:55.840 for participation
00:47:56.940 in our new
00:47:57.460 society.
00:47:58.180 I'm seriously
00:47:59.100 considering it
00:47:59.960 now.
00:48:01.500 All right.
00:48:03.520 How many times
00:48:04.640 would you have to
00:48:05.300 have that
00:48:05.600 experience before
00:48:06.440 you identified
00:48:07.080 as gay?
00:48:09.380 For me, it's
00:48:10.120 one.
00:48:11.800 It's one.
00:48:13.440 I would never
00:48:14.540 put myself in
00:48:15.760 this situation
00:48:16.440 again.
00:48:17.100 Now, I'm in a
00:48:17.600 lucky situation.
00:48:18.500 I don't have to
00:48:18.940 apply for any
00:48:19.540 jobs.
00:48:20.520 But if you put
00:48:21.400 me in this
00:48:21.860 situation, oh,
00:48:23.320 I'm gay as
00:48:23.940 fuck.
00:48:24.960 I'm going to
00:48:25.380 be so gay, I
00:48:26.900 will suck a 1.00
00:48:27.580 cock in the 0.83
00:48:29.020 interview.
00:48:29.860 I'll blow the
00:48:30.760 interviewer for
00:48:31.760 that.
00:48:32.040 No, I won't.
00:48:32.740 I'm just
00:48:33.020 kidding.
00:48:33.620 But I would
00:48:34.060 identify as
00:48:34.720 gay. 0.93
00:48:35.640 I would identify
00:48:36.260 as black.
00:48:37.220 I would sit
00:48:37.880 right in front
00:48:38.340 of them and
00:48:38.720 tell them I
00:48:39.060 was Chinese.
00:48:39.940 No, I
00:48:40.200 wouldn't say
00:48:40.520 Asian because 0.99
00:48:41.040 that would
00:48:41.300 hurt.
00:48:42.320 They don't
00:48:42.600 like the
00:48:44.160 Asian-American
00:48:44.740 community.
00:48:45.840 But I would
00:48:46.340 say I was
00:48:46.740 black.
00:48:47.640 I would sit
00:48:48.160 right there in
00:48:48.680 front of them
00:48:49.080 and say,
00:48:49.440 yeah, I'm
00:48:49.680 black.
00:48:50.900 I would make
00:48:51.420 them tell me
00:48:52.000 that I can't
00:48:52.600 self-identify.
00:48:54.100 But I would
00:48:54.780 never put up
00:48:55.420 with this
00:48:55.860 bullshit twice.
00:48:57.980 I don't know
00:48:58.680 what your
00:48:59.080 limit is, but
00:49:00.240 my limit is
00:49:01.160 once.
00:49:03.020 This is going
00:49:03.760 to happen to
00:49:04.280 me one
00:49:05.760 fucking time.
00:49:07.540 I mean, I
00:49:07.960 would try it
00:49:08.480 without any
00:49:09.180 tricks the
00:49:09.680 first time.
00:49:10.340 But after
00:49:10.780 that, no, I'm
00:49:12.320 going full
00:49:12.900 bullshit after
00:49:13.560 that.
00:49:14.180 You do this
00:49:14.780 to me, I'm
00:49:15.380 going to lie
00:49:15.880 like a fuck. 0.90
00:49:17.160 And I'm not
00:49:17.620 even going to
00:49:17.980 think twice
00:49:18.460 about it.
00:49:18.880 And by
00:49:20.360 the way, if
00:49:21.220 you build
00:49:21.560 an AI after
00:49:22.620 that set of
00:49:23.560 ethics, it'll 0.99
00:49:24.120 be a good
00:49:24.520 AI.
00:49:25.920 Yeah, you
00:49:26.440 want your
00:49:27.140 AI to do
00:49:27.720 exactly what
00:49:28.960 I just said.
00:49:29.860 Don't put up
00:49:30.380 with racism.
00:49:32.000 Do whatever
00:49:32.540 you have to
00:49:32.960 do to thwart
00:49:33.520 it.
00:49:34.240 In fact, I
00:49:34.840 think every
00:49:35.340 white male
00:49:36.060 should be
00:49:36.800 identifying as
00:49:37.720 black
00:49:38.160 immediately.
00:49:40.020 Now, remember
00:49:40.560 I told you I
00:49:41.240 registered as a
00:49:42.620 Democrat?
00:49:44.440 And everybody
00:49:45.200 said, you
00:49:45.880 stupid guy, 0.94
00:49:48.040 why'd you do
00:49:48.540 that?
00:49:48.880 Because I
00:49:49.260 know you
00:49:49.520 like Trump
00:49:50.040 and you
00:49:50.340 like Vivek.
00:49:51.380 Why would
00:49:51.900 you register
00:49:52.720 as a
00:49:53.100 Democrat?
00:49:54.920 You ready?
00:49:58.160 You're on a
00:49:58.940 list of
00:50:00.220 people they're
00:50:00.760 going to go
00:50:01.200 after.
00:50:03.140 Why do I
00:50:03.820 want to be
00:50:04.300 on the hit
00:50:04.780 list?
00:50:06.120 When they
00:50:06.680 go after your
00:50:07.760 guns, do you
00:50:08.360 think they're
00:50:08.720 going to go
00:50:09.020 after the
00:50:09.400 Democrats
00:50:09.740 first?
00:50:11.000 No.
00:50:11.460 They're going
00:50:11.740 to look at
00:50:12.100 your political
00:50:12.900 registration and
00:50:14.480 they're going
00:50:14.800 to go to
00:50:15.100 your house
00:50:15.460 fucking first. 0.69
00:50:17.000 If you're
00:50:17.600 going to lose
00:50:17.960 your gun,
00:50:18.440 it's because
00:50:18.780 you're a
00:50:19.140 dumbass who 0.88
00:50:19.760 said you're
00:50:21.020 a Republican.
00:50:22.280 Why?
00:50:23.580 You need to
00:50:24.360 hide that
00:50:24.860 shit right
00:50:25.440 away.
00:50:26.300 Now you
00:50:26.580 can register
00:50:27.780 for the
00:50:28.780 primary or
00:50:29.380 whatever and
00:50:31.220 then just
00:50:31.700 unregister as
00:50:32.540 soon as you
00:50:32.900 can.
00:50:33.740 But you
00:50:34.360 need to get
00:50:35.180 off that
00:50:35.800 list.
00:50:37.660 You can
00:50:38.000 still act the
00:50:38.640 same, but
00:50:39.560 don't get on
00:50:40.420 the list.
00:50:41.640 They're going
00:50:42.040 to use that
00:50:42.620 to come for
00:50:43.280 you if things
00:50:44.180 get worse.
00:50:45.160 It's not a
00:50:45.640 prediction.
00:50:46.000 It's a
00:50:47.140 risk, sort
00:50:48.220 of a risk
00:50:48.640 management
00:50:49.100 thing.
00:50:50.140 Don't put
00:50:50.680 yourself on
00:50:52.380 the please
00:50:53.320 take my
00:50:53.940 guns first
00:50:54.940 list.
00:50:56.760 And most
00:50:57.100 of you
00:50:57.380 have.
00:50:58.760 That's just
00:50:59.300 an error.
00:51:01.060 You've got to
00:51:01.660 take care of
00:51:02.080 your safety.
00:51:03.060 You're not
00:51:03.380 even protecting
00:51:03.960 your family if
00:51:04.760 you're doing
00:51:05.040 that.
00:51:05.980 You need to
00:51:06.660 register as
00:51:07.460 independent.
00:51:09.780 I don't know.
00:51:11.220 It might
00:51:11.500 help.
00:51:12.080 But if you
00:51:12.380 register a
00:51:13.880 Democrat, I
00:51:14.680 guarantee they're
00:51:15.520 going to your
00:51:16.080 house last.
00:51:17.820 Am I wrong?
00:51:19.160 Tell me I'm
00:51:19.680 wrong.
00:51:21.500 Disagree with
00:51:22.100 me.
00:51:22.720 Go ahead.
00:51:23.820 Disagree with
00:51:24.460 me in the
00:51:24.800 comments.
00:51:25.920 It is a
00:51:26.460 fucking mistake
00:51:27.340 to be on the
00:51:28.160 take my guns
00:51:28.900 first list.
00:51:30.400 Don't do
00:51:30.920 it.
00:51:32.040 In fact,
00:51:32.540 joining the
00:51:33.360 NRA to
00:51:34.760 me is
00:51:35.100 suicide.
00:51:37.300 It's
00:51:37.800 suicide.
00:51:38.640 The NRA is
00:51:39.340 literally a list
00:51:40.200 of people who
00:51:40.640 have guns.
00:51:42.040 Why in the
00:51:42.600 world would
00:51:43.220 you own a
00:51:43.700 gun and
00:51:44.000 put yourself
00:51:44.480 on that
00:51:44.880 list?
00:51:46.180 Now, I
00:51:46.540 suppose if
00:51:47.060 they could
00:51:52.060 find you
00:51:52.720 just because
00:51:53.620 you registered
00:51:54.120 to buy a
00:51:54.600 gun.
00:51:55.200 But I
00:51:55.520 imagine there
00:51:55.960 are plenty
00:51:56.200 of people who
00:51:56.760 have NRA
00:51:57.420 membership who
00:51:58.860 maybe don't
00:51:59.360 have a
00:51:59.660 registered gun.
00:52:01.240 But they're
00:52:01.860 on a list.
00:52:03.320 They're going
00:52:03.640 to go there
00:52:04.000 first.
00:52:05.340 All right,
00:52:05.600 here's my
00:52:05.940 other suggestion.
00:52:07.880 Apparently,
00:52:09.040 a muse
00:52:09.600 recorded the
00:52:11.360 interview.
00:52:14.160 Now, I
00:52:14.540 don't know
00:52:14.780 the legality
00:52:15.480 of that,
00:52:16.260 but I
00:52:16.580 would suggest
00:52:17.080 that white 0.95
00:52:17.960 men, when
00:52:18.540 they go for
00:52:19.060 a job interview,
00:52:19.740 should wear a
00:52:20.220 body cam and
00:52:22.440 disclose it.
00:52:24.180 Say, hi, I'm
00:52:25.200 wearing a body
00:52:25.740 cam because I'm
00:52:27.020 a white male,
00:52:28.740 and it's just
00:52:29.680 part of my
00:52:30.120 process now to
00:52:31.020 stay safe.
00:52:32.240 And then ask
00:52:33.060 them directly,
00:52:33.680 what is your
00:52:35.320 identity versus
00:52:37.420 merit philosophy?
00:52:40.900 And just make
00:52:41.820 them say it.
00:52:43.140 Make them say
00:52:43.900 it on record.
00:52:44.740 Now, they
00:52:45.000 probably wouldn't
00:52:45.440 interview you.
00:52:46.320 They say, get
00:52:46.900 out of here.
00:52:48.160 But somehow,
00:52:50.360 we're going to
00:52:50.580 have to figure
00:52:51.280 out a way to
00:52:53.100 call out the
00:52:54.120 bad people.
00:52:55.420 Now, I would
00:52:55.980 love to see a
00:52:56.600 list of Fortune
00:52:57.600 500 companies and
00:52:58.820 others who will
00:53:01.040 say specifically
00:53:02.440 that they will
00:53:03.540 value merit
00:53:04.580 first over
00:53:06.920 identity.
00:53:08.620 I don't mind
00:53:09.520 if they include
00:53:10.200 identity, but I
00:53:12.380 need a specific
00:53:13.940 statement that
00:53:15.320 it's your first
00:53:16.300 filter.
00:53:17.760 And then if
00:53:19.080 identity is
00:53:19.900 important to you,
00:53:20.640 go ahead.
00:53:23.500 But don't you
00:53:24.340 think we need a
00:53:24.960 list?
00:53:26.540 Because I would
00:53:27.300 never apply for a
00:53:28.260 job that wouldn't
00:53:28.900 say that directly.
00:53:30.080 If you can't say
00:53:31.180 merit first,
00:53:32.440 but we also
00:53:33.120 like to have
00:53:33.780 diversity, which
00:53:34.800 I do too.
00:53:36.100 If you can't say
00:53:36.840 that directly, I
00:53:37.540 don't want to even
00:53:38.120 apply for a job
00:53:38.820 there.
00:53:42.080 Harris is talking
00:53:43.000 about the
00:53:43.400 conservatives are
00:53:44.260 bad people for
00:53:45.100 banning our
00:53:45.680 books.
00:53:48.080 So do you
00:53:48.920 think history is
00:53:49.540 real?
00:53:51.000 So Kamala
00:53:51.620 thinks that they're
00:53:53.220 banning books so
00:53:53.940 we're losing our
00:53:54.840 history.
00:53:55.700 What exactly are
00:53:57.480 the books that are
00:53:58.160 getting banned?
00:53:58.780 The history of
00:53:59.680 teaching children
00:54:01.060 how to jerk
00:54:01.880 off?
00:54:03.200 Because that's
00:54:04.280 the sort of
00:54:04.880 book that's
00:54:05.480 getting banned.
00:54:07.740 Although that
00:54:08.380 would have been a
00:54:08.780 helpful book when
00:54:09.460 I was a kid.
00:54:10.600 I hate that I
00:54:11.180 had to figure it
00:54:11.740 out myself from
00:54:12.620 listening to my
00:54:14.260 friends Brian and
00:54:15.120 Eddie describe what
00:54:16.780 they did in the
00:54:17.340 treehouse.
00:54:22.220 Sorry, Brian and
00:54:23.240 Eddie, but you
00:54:24.800 taught me everything
00:54:25.480 I know.
00:54:27.740 Boy, was I
00:54:28.580 surprised.
00:54:29.980 It does what?
00:54:32.660 I remember the
00:54:33.520 first time somebody
00:54:34.240 said, yeah, if you
00:54:35.320 just keep pulling on
00:54:36.220 it, like something
00:54:37.700 comes out.
00:54:38.880 I was like, what?
00:54:41.980 What are you
00:54:42.580 talking about?
00:54:44.020 You'd be like,
00:54:44.660 P?
00:54:45.820 Oh, my eyes were
00:54:47.420 open that day.
00:54:48.480 So thanks, Eddie.
00:54:49.280 All right, Trump
00:54:52.840 has come out
00:54:53.680 opposing digital
00:54:54.880 currency for the
00:54:55.760 country.
00:54:56.880 That's a
00:54:57.400 Vivek position.
00:54:58.540 I don't think we'd
00:54:59.500 heard Trump say
00:55:01.120 something specifically
00:55:02.260 about it before.
00:55:03.800 But now, Vivek
00:55:05.100 said he, you
00:55:06.100 know, in order to
00:55:07.640 be even considered
00:55:08.540 for vice
00:55:09.040 president, he'd
00:55:11.160 have to make
00:55:11.720 sure Trump and
00:55:12.620 he were on the
00:55:13.200 same page on
00:55:13.960 this.
00:55:14.580 So it looks
00:55:15.420 like Trump
00:55:16.140 taking some good
00:55:18.000 advice and
00:55:19.840 implementing it.
00:55:21.680 So that's
00:55:23.760 something.
00:55:24.800 But we're still
00:55:25.360 talking about
00:55:26.080 other people
00:55:29.240 being possible
00:55:30.500 vice president
00:55:31.120 picks.
00:55:32.840 What do you
00:55:33.580 think of
00:55:34.000 Kristi Noem?
00:55:36.800 Kristi Noem
00:55:37.740 as Trump's
00:55:39.420 VP pick.
00:55:40.060 What do you
00:55:40.240 think?
00:55:41.740 No?
00:55:42.500 Why not?
00:55:44.280 Why not?
00:55:46.240 It's a wall
00:55:47.180 of no's.
00:55:48.000 All right, so
00:55:49.140 if you were
00:55:50.060 Trump, given,
00:55:52.840 you know, looking
00:55:53.360 at the wall of
00:55:54.680 answers to whether
00:55:56.400 Kristi Noem is
00:55:57.180 the right pick,
00:55:58.420 yeah, no.
00:56:02.260 So one of the
00:56:03.180 problems is that
00:56:04.680 she allegedly had 0.87
00:56:05.960 an affair with,
00:56:07.320 you know, one of
00:56:07.880 Trump's staff
00:56:08.740 members.
00:56:09.500 So that's not an
00:56:10.720 ideal look.
00:56:11.960 But I feel like
00:56:14.580 she's the poor 1.00
00:56:16.100 man's Tulsi.
00:56:18.780 She's the poor 1.00
00:56:19.520 man's Tulsi
00:56:20.220 Gabbard.
00:56:21.600 Am I right?
00:56:24.780 As soon as you
00:56:25.580 hear it, yeah,
00:56:26.860 as soon as you
00:56:27.360 hear it, you go,
00:56:27.960 oh, yeah.
00:56:30.080 I mean, why would
00:56:31.260 you pick Kristi
00:56:32.520 Noem if you could
00:56:33.820 have Tulsi?
00:56:34.420 I don't know that
00:56:35.480 you could have
00:56:35.940 her.
00:56:36.060 I mean, I'm not
00:56:37.260 saying she would
00:56:37.900 say yes to it.
00:56:39.320 But those don't
00:56:42.180 seem like in the
00:56:42.980 same class to me.
00:56:45.580 Yeah.
00:56:46.760 So I don't get a
00:56:48.240 sense of strength
00:56:49.260 from Kristi Noem.
00:56:51.040 And that's my
00:56:52.200 issue.
00:56:53.260 You know, Trump
00:56:53.780 is all about
00:56:54.280 energy and
00:56:55.020 strength,
00:56:56.140 more so than,
00:56:57.960 you know, passing
00:56:58.480 the fact-checking.
00:56:59.280 And that's
00:56:59.800 worked well because
00:57:01.040 energy and strength
00:57:02.040 are really
00:57:02.680 persuasive,
00:57:03.880 attractive qualities.
00:57:05.500 So if I look at
00:57:06.760 energy and strength,
00:57:08.260 I don't see
00:57:09.600 Kristi Noem who
00:57:10.760 looks like a stiff
00:57:12.140 wind would blow
00:57:12.860 her away.
00:57:14.840 Like, I want
00:57:15.400 somebody who,
00:57:17.140 you know, if the
00:57:18.360 mainland of the
00:57:20.040 United States was
00:57:20.860 attacked in a,
00:57:21.980 like a Hamas-like 0.94
00:57:23.240 attack, which
00:57:25.700 house would you
00:57:26.300 rather live next
00:57:27.060 to?
00:57:27.260 They both have
00:57:27.780 guns.
00:57:28.940 Right?
00:57:29.020 They both have
00:57:29.540 guns, I think.
00:57:31.220 I mean, as far as
00:57:32.060 I know, she hunts.
00:57:34.040 I think I'd want
00:57:35.900 Tulsi, you know,
00:57:38.600 protecting my
00:57:39.460 house.
00:57:40.480 I don't know.
00:57:40.900 I just feel like I
00:57:41.660 would.
00:57:42.700 But they both have
00:57:43.440 guns.
00:57:45.200 How about, let's
00:57:46.980 see, well, somebody
00:57:47.900 else was suggested.
00:57:51.400 Is there anybody
00:57:52.060 else you're thinking
00:57:52.700 of?
00:57:54.160 How about
00:57:54.820 Elise Stefanik?
00:57:56.960 Elise Stefanik.
00:57:58.340 Do we like
00:58:00.540 her?
00:58:01.400 I don't know
00:58:02.020 enough about
00:58:02.560 her.
00:58:05.700 I'm saying
00:58:06.380 yeses and
00:58:07.020 nos.
00:58:08.600 Yeah, I don't
00:58:09.220 know.
00:58:10.020 She's very much
00:58:11.620 in alignment with
00:58:12.620 them politically.
00:58:13.920 I don't know
00:58:14.520 enough about her,
00:58:15.460 so I don't know
00:58:15.980 if that's good or
00:58:16.700 not.
00:58:17.060 my first choice
00:58:21.920 for Vivek would
00:58:24.340 be any job that
00:58:25.440 doesn't bog him
00:58:26.300 down doing
00:58:26.840 bullshit.
00:58:28.120 So I wouldn't
00:58:28.840 want him to be in
00:58:30.020 a cabinet position
00:58:31.160 because it feels
00:58:32.100 like that's doing a
00:58:32.920 lot of email, if
00:58:34.260 you know what I
00:58:34.640 mean.
00:58:35.400 It just feels like
00:58:36.200 that would be
00:58:36.680 meetings and
00:58:37.560 bullshit and he'd 0.90
00:58:38.420 disappear.
00:58:39.320 You don't want to
00:58:40.000 Pete Buttigieg him,
00:58:42.300 right?
00:58:42.540 You don't want to
00:58:43.380 think you're doing
00:58:44.860 him a favor, but
00:58:45.740 he just disappears
00:58:46.660 into the bureaucracy.
00:58:49.220 I'm not sure you
00:58:50.340 want him to be
00:58:50.900 vice president
00:58:51.620 because then he's
00:58:53.640 going to be
00:58:54.000 overseas at
00:58:55.040 funerals and
00:58:55.960 just more
00:58:56.820 bullshit, just
00:58:58.080 stuff that he
00:58:58.820 doesn't need to
00:58:59.300 be part of.
00:59:00.400 And sooner or
00:59:01.020 later it would
00:59:01.700 turn into some
00:59:02.460 fight between
00:59:03.180 Trump and him
00:59:03.940 about anything.
00:59:06.420 But if he
00:59:09.540 were, let's
00:59:11.040 say, a special
00:59:12.880 assistant to the
00:59:13.780 president, not
00:59:15.300 chief of staff
00:59:16.080 because that's
00:59:16.600 too much bullshit
00:59:17.360 work, and it's
00:59:19.420 better to have an
00:59:19.920 insider for that
00:59:20.740 because they know
00:59:21.200 where all the
00:59:21.700 bodies are buried.
00:59:23.320 I think he needs
00:59:24.000 to be like a
00:59:24.740 Kelly, Kelly,
00:59:28.100 whose name I'm
00:59:30.100 forgetting, Kelly
00:59:31.580 Conway.
00:59:32.760 Yeah.
00:59:33.340 I think he needs
00:59:34.080 to be a Kelly
00:59:34.600 Conway because
00:59:35.980 Kelly Conway was,
00:59:37.700 I think, not
00:59:39.400 bogged down by
00:59:40.360 bureaucracy, you
00:59:41.880 know, didn't have
00:59:42.400 to fly to any
00:59:43.220 funerals, and was
00:59:45.200 pretty much always
00:59:45.900 available to be in
00:59:48.060 Trump's ear and
00:59:48.940 probably was really,
00:59:50.360 really helpful, my
00:59:51.500 guess.
00:59:52.140 You know, just
00:59:52.420 based on seeing her
00:59:54.320 on TV, I think she
00:59:55.560 was probably one of
00:59:56.740 the most helpful
00:59:57.340 people in his
00:59:58.620 administration.
01:00:00.020 So I think that's
01:00:01.700 the kind of influence
01:00:02.760 you want to make
01:00:03.500 to have.
01:00:03.920 Trump, I think.
01:00:08.340 Because if you
01:00:09.340 tell me, give me
01:00:10.540 raw Trump all the
01:00:12.540 time, you know,
01:00:13.760 nobody's influencing
01:00:14.700 him, it's just raw
01:00:15.480 Trump, even I'm
01:00:16.880 scared of that.
01:00:18.880 Not because he
01:00:20.040 would do anything
01:00:20.580 that's, you know,
01:00:21.620 intentionally dangerous,
01:00:23.160 but because he's the
01:00:24.480 type of personality
01:00:25.440 who needs, he's a yin 1.00
01:00:29.100 who needs a yang.
01:00:30.000 Like, he needs a
01:00:32.240 Kellyanne Conway.
01:00:33.680 Because I'm pretty
01:00:34.500 sure she could give
01:00:35.400 him the straight
01:00:36.760 answer, you know,
01:00:37.540 not the keep my job
01:00:39.340 answer.
01:00:40.440 Don't you feel like
01:00:41.220 she gave him real
01:00:41.960 answers, not bullshit?
01:00:44.080 He needs that.
01:00:45.760 And I think Vivek is
01:00:47.260 that, you know, is
01:00:48.420 that times ten.
01:00:51.340 Tim Scott is just
01:00:55.420 too on the nose.
01:00:56.620 I don't know.
01:00:59.280 It just seems too
01:01:00.160 obviously pandering to
01:01:01.740 be the right decision.
01:01:03.180 If you pick Vivek,
01:01:05.180 nobody thinks it's
01:01:06.620 because he's brown.
01:01:08.340 Am I right?
01:01:10.100 There's not a single
01:01:11.200 person who would say,
01:01:11.980 oh, you picked
01:01:12.520 Vivek because he's
01:01:13.520 brown.
01:01:14.600 Not a single person
01:01:15.700 would say that.
01:01:16.480 Because he's so
01:01:17.040 obviously, you know,
01:01:18.580 he brings the weight
01:01:19.980 like he brings the
01:01:21.360 real deal.
01:01:22.380 But if you pick, you
01:01:23.440 know, Ben Carson or
01:01:24.520 Tim Scott, you're
01:01:26.160 going to think that
01:01:26.840 was identity first.
01:01:28.960 And those are both
01:01:29.860 very capable people.
01:01:31.800 But Vivek is a
01:01:32.580 different level.
01:01:33.940 You know, they're
01:01:34.260 not comparable in
01:01:35.980 terms of their
01:01:36.460 capabilities or even
01:01:37.440 close.
01:01:38.120 But they're very
01:01:38.740 good.
01:01:39.720 You know, I have
01:01:40.500 only good feelings
01:01:41.200 about Tim Scott.
01:01:42.940 And, you know, Ben
01:01:43.720 Carson's a good guy.
01:01:46.520 I just think he's a
01:01:47.520 little too old.
01:01:48.100 He's not the right
01:01:48.720 choice.
01:01:51.820 DeSantis would be
01:01:52.840 just another, he
01:01:55.380 would just be Trump
01:01:56.140 light.
01:01:56.780 I can't see that
01:01:57.560 happening.
01:01:58.200 It doesn't seem like a
01:01:59.040 possibility.
01:02:00.520 Well, in other news,
01:02:04.320 scientists can use
01:02:05.400 magnets to change
01:02:06.400 your mind.
01:02:07.600 So they can put
01:02:08.420 magnets around your
01:02:09.720 head and the
01:02:10.500 magnetic field will
01:02:12.560 cause you to change
01:02:14.100 your feelings about
01:02:15.300 everything from
01:02:17.420 immigration to
01:02:19.220 other things.
01:02:19.980 So you can change
01:02:21.020 your strong political
01:02:22.060 feelings by putting
01:02:23.180 a magnet near your
01:02:24.080 brain.
01:02:25.620 Now, keep in mind
01:02:26.380 that your magnet,
01:02:27.280 your brain would not
01:02:28.300 know a magnet was
01:02:29.240 there.
01:02:30.620 Because, you know,
01:02:31.560 you hold the magnet
01:02:32.320 up to your head and
01:02:33.220 you don't go, ooh, my
01:02:34.160 brain is so attracted
01:02:35.320 to that magnet.
01:02:36.240 You don't feel it.
01:02:37.700 So that's why it's so
01:02:38.580 creepy.
01:02:39.700 It's basically brain
01:02:41.080 control from an
01:02:43.200 external source that
01:02:44.980 would change your
01:02:45.600 entire opinion about
01:02:47.300 whether to be tough
01:02:48.500 or loyal or, you know,
01:02:50.020 just really basic
01:02:50.920 stuff.
01:02:52.980 Now, what the
01:02:54.600 science left out is
01:02:56.980 that your free will
01:02:58.640 can completely
01:03:00.540 control this.
01:03:02.120 So you put the
01:03:03.120 magnets up to me and
01:03:05.280 even though you
01:03:06.680 would say, well,
01:03:07.440 Scott, it's just
01:03:07.980 physics.
01:03:09.400 It's just a case of
01:03:10.220 physics.
01:03:10.860 It's just changing
01:03:11.560 your brain structure
01:03:12.680 or changing how it
01:03:14.540 operates chemically
01:03:15.320 maybe.
01:03:16.280 And so it's really a
01:03:17.480 different machine
01:03:18.340 because the magnets
01:03:20.320 turn it into a
01:03:21.100 different device
01:03:21.840 essentially.
01:03:22.700 So your free will
01:03:23.800 isn't going to make
01:03:24.880 any difference, to
01:03:25.580 which I say, oh,
01:03:26.760 no, you don't
01:03:28.020 understand that my
01:03:28.780 free will is
01:03:29.980 independent of
01:03:30.860 physics and science.
01:03:32.700 It's magic and
01:03:34.940 therefore it can
01:03:35.860 overcome these
01:03:36.540 magnets.
01:03:39.240 Right?
01:03:39.800 No.
01:03:43.900 Free will is a
01:03:45.360 ridiculous concept.
01:03:47.620 And if you can
01:03:48.580 change somebody's
01:03:49.320 opinion with a
01:03:50.060 magnet, it means
01:03:51.900 that cause and
01:03:53.040 effect is the only
01:03:54.120 thing that makes
01:03:54.700 your opinions.
01:03:56.280 You don't have
01:03:57.220 your magical soul
01:03:58.520 coming up with your
01:04:00.020 own special opinions.
01:04:02.440 You are assigned
01:04:03.680 your opinions for the
01:04:04.640 most part from the
01:04:05.580 media.
01:04:05.820 And then beyond
01:04:08.320 that, it's just
01:04:09.180 physics cause and
01:04:11.120 effect.
01:04:11.840 And that's it.
01:04:12.340 That's the whole
01:04:12.700 story.
01:04:13.020 There's nothing left
01:04:13.620 out.
01:04:15.120 All right.
01:04:16.720 Texas continues to
01:04:18.980 get some pushback
01:04:19.720 from the federal
01:04:20.380 government because
01:04:21.640 Texas wants to 1.00
01:04:22.440 control its own
01:04:23.080 border, at least in
01:04:24.580 the Shelby Park
01:04:25.500 area.
01:04:26.600 And the government's
01:04:27.660 trying to get the
01:04:29.000 courts to make them
01:04:29.780 stand down.
01:04:32.200 Well, that's that
01:04:33.100 whole story.
01:04:34.200 Not too
01:04:34.820 interesting.
01:04:35.440 But I do like the
01:04:36.200 fact that Texas has
01:04:37.100 some fight in them.
01:04:39.820 If you haven't seen
01:04:40.800 Glenn Greenwald take
01:04:41.940 down Joy Reid, you
01:04:44.960 really need to.
01:04:46.720 So Joy Reid and
01:04:48.340 Rachel Madnow, I
01:04:51.220 call her.
01:04:52.440 You call her
01:04:53.220 Rachel Madnow?
01:04:57.680 I forgot her real
01:04:58.360 name.
01:04:59.060 But I call her
01:04:59.660 Rachel Madnow.
01:05:01.560 Now, everybody
01:05:04.060 who's saying mad
01:05:04.700 cow, you are doing
01:05:07.340 a worse joke than
01:05:08.380 mine.
01:05:09.520 So everybody needs
01:05:10.480 to say mad cow
01:05:11.280 because we've got a
01:05:11.800 lot of NPCs.
01:05:13.280 Get it out of your
01:05:13.920 system.
01:05:14.340 Just say mad cow. 1.00
01:05:16.000 Go ahead.
01:05:17.120 Go ahead.
01:05:17.800 Say it.
01:05:18.980 Mad cow, mad cow. 1.00
01:05:20.200 No.
01:05:20.780 Mad cow is not as
01:05:21.740 funny as Rachel
01:05:23.580 Madnow.
01:05:24.820 Let me explain why.
01:05:25.780 Because the racial and 0.52
01:05:29.160 the mad cow don't 1.00
01:05:31.260 really fit together.
01:05:32.300 They would just be
01:05:32.820 two different things.
01:05:34.360 But if you're racial
01:05:36.060 and mad now, it says
01:05:38.860 that the thing you're
01:05:39.500 mad now about is
01:05:41.100 always something
01:05:41.700 racial and it always 1.00
01:05:42.660 is.
01:05:44.000 Now, that's actually
01:05:44.980 good.
01:05:46.080 So racial mad now,
01:05:49.440 much better.
01:05:50.540 Mad cow is funny,
01:05:52.080 but it doesn't get you
01:05:52.780 as much.
01:05:53.940 It's not as deep.
01:05:56.900 All right.
01:05:57.340 But it's also funny.
01:05:59.500 So Glenn Greenwald
01:06:01.900 goes after them for
01:06:03.060 just being ridiculous
01:06:04.240 clowns.
01:06:05.540 But I believe that
01:06:07.500 there's something
01:06:07.980 different happening
01:06:08.940 with Joy Reid and
01:06:11.060 racial mad now.
01:06:13.140 That's not the same
01:06:14.540 as what's happening
01:06:15.200 with other people.
01:06:16.440 If I watch Adam
01:06:17.720 Schiff disagreeing
01:06:19.440 with me and saying
01:06:20.260 some stuff on TV,
01:06:21.540 I never think he's
01:06:22.780 mentally ill.
01:06:25.560 Because he doesn't
01:06:26.560 really look it.
01:06:27.120 He just looks like a
01:06:27.960 liar and a weasel.
01:06:29.700 If I see Eric
01:06:30.880 Swalwell saying stuff
01:06:32.720 that sounds ridiculous
01:06:34.360 to me, I never think
01:06:36.340 he doesn't know what
01:06:37.280 he's doing.
01:06:38.720 I think he knows
01:06:39.560 exactly what he's
01:06:40.420 doing.
01:06:41.000 And he's not mentally
01:06:42.040 ill even a little bit.
01:06:43.860 You might not like him
01:06:44.860 ethically or politically,
01:06:46.200 but he's not mentally
01:06:47.020 ill.
01:06:47.800 He looks like he's
01:06:48.460 perfectly functioning.
01:06:49.360 But now, but then I
01:06:52.260 turn on, you know,
01:06:53.160 Lawrence O'Donnell,
01:06:56.060 Rachel Maddow, and
01:06:57.700 Joy Reid, and I don't
01:06:59.720 get that vibe.
01:07:01.160 I don't get the vibe
01:07:02.740 that they're completely
01:07:03.940 aware that they're just
01:07:05.260 political creatures who
01:07:06.420 are lying to us for
01:07:07.400 effect.
01:07:08.200 They actually seem
01:07:09.880 mentally ill.
01:07:11.380 Now, I'm not saying
01:07:12.580 that with any hyperbole.
01:07:13.360 Hyperbole, I mean this
01:07:15.900 to be purely medical.
01:07:19.100 To me, they present as
01:07:22.020 literally mentally ill. 0.51
01:07:25.100 Now, let's take somebody
01:07:26.100 else on the network,
01:07:27.080 because you're going to
01:07:27.560 say, and you should,
01:07:29.060 Scott, it's just because
01:07:29.900 you don't like MSNBC.
01:07:31.820 No.
01:07:33.260 If I'm watching, you know,
01:07:35.060 Ari Melber, he's there,
01:07:38.160 right?
01:07:38.660 That's MSNBC.
01:07:39.900 I don't say he's crazy.
01:07:41.600 He doesn't look crazy.
01:07:42.500 If I say Chris Hayes,
01:07:45.940 I disagree with him,
01:07:48.020 but he doesn't look
01:07:48.680 crazy at all.
01:07:50.120 He just looks like he
01:07:50.960 has opinions.
01:07:51.900 But Lawrence O'Donnell
01:07:52.780 does look mentally ill.
01:07:55.580 And, yeah, I'm not even
01:07:58.320 sure about Joy Behar.
01:08:00.860 I'm not even going to say
01:08:02.780 Joy Behar looks mentally
01:08:04.260 ill.
01:08:05.420 I think she just has a
01:08:06.640 team.
01:08:08.340 She just looks like a 0.98
01:08:09.540 team player who, you
01:08:11.160 know, just says everything
01:08:12.200 for her team.
01:08:13.180 And I think on some
01:08:14.680 level, if you were to
01:08:15.560 talk to her privately, I
01:08:18.120 think on some level she
01:08:19.280 knows what she's doing.
01:08:20.660 So I think she's closer
01:08:21.840 to a shift than a
01:08:23.360 mentally ill person.
01:08:26.080 Now, of course, I'm not
01:08:27.100 qualified to, you know,
01:08:29.780 diagnose anybody.
01:08:32.780 Now, Anna Navarro doesn't 1.00
01:08:34.220 look crazy to me.
01:08:36.180 Anna Navarro looks
01:08:37.240 political and like she's on
01:08:38.700 a team.
01:08:39.020 She doesn't look crazy at
01:08:40.280 all, in my opinion.
01:08:42.360 So the question is, can
01:08:44.260 people identify mental
01:08:46.420 illness by looking at
01:08:49.160 somebody?
01:08:50.320 I feel like not only can
01:08:52.340 we, but it's really built
01:08:53.420 into our biology so that we
01:08:55.760 can avoid mating with them.
01:08:58.760 Right?
01:08:59.480 So you can spot a lack of
01:09:02.040 symmetry in somebody, which is
01:09:03.580 a signal of, you know, genetic
01:09:05.440 imperfection.
01:09:07.580 But I think you could spot
01:09:09.100 illness that's been tested.
01:09:11.460 People can spot somebody who's
01:09:12.700 not feeling well just by
01:09:13.940 looking at their face.
01:09:15.240 But I think mental illness is 1.00
01:09:16.540 like right there.
01:09:18.720 And Rachel Meadow just looks 0.88
01:09:22.820 mentally ill, as does Joy Reid
01:09:25.100 and Lawrence O'Donnell.
01:09:26.760 Anyway, that's fun.
01:09:35.100 This is what Glenn Greenwald
01:09:37.920 said.
01:09:42.640 Talking about Joy Reid, I
01:09:44.060 think.
01:09:44.360 He said, anything she doesn't
01:09:45.520 understand, and it's a long
01:09:46.780 list, she defaults to blaming 0.78
01:09:48.820 racism.
01:09:50.280 Now, I'm paraphrasing.
01:09:51.220 He didn't say those exact words,
01:09:52.580 but that's pretty close.
01:09:53.500 That does seem actually
01:09:57.360 accurate, that anything she
01:09:59.160 doesn't understand, she
01:10:01.720 blames on racism.
01:10:04.540 Now, we can't read her mind,
01:10:05.820 so we don't know that's what's
01:10:06.920 going on in there, but it's a
01:10:08.780 funny characterization.
01:10:10.400 All right, ladies and
01:10:11.020 gentlemen, that was all I had
01:10:13.500 prepared for today.
01:10:16.040 Good timing.
01:10:17.080 Is there any topic I missed
01:10:18.280 that you're just dying to hear
01:10:20.740 me weigh in on?
01:10:23.500 All right.
01:10:30.560 Can you talk about persuading
01:10:32.260 for a three-way?
01:10:33.680 Yeah, I can talk about that.
01:10:36.020 Persuasion for a three-way is
01:10:37.380 actually fairly easy.
01:10:38.760 Would anybody like to know how
01:10:40.060 to do it?
01:10:41.560 Yeah.
01:10:43.440 You find three unusually
01:10:45.680 attractive people, and you're
01:10:49.500 done.
01:10:49.680 That's pretty much all it takes.
01:10:55.180 I've never had a three-way.
01:10:58.380 I've never had one because I'm
01:10:59.880 not one of the three attractive
01:11:01.220 people.
01:11:03.400 If I were, like, seriously good
01:11:05.460 looking, I'm sure I would have
01:11:08.540 had a few.
01:11:10.120 Sure I would have had a few.
01:11:11.380 But no, it's not really a
01:11:13.340 persuasion problem.
01:11:15.120 It's a little bit more, are you so
01:11:17.520 hot that people will have sex with 0.99
01:11:19.020 you, even if somebody else is
01:11:20.080 doing it at the same time?
01:11:22.900 All right.
01:11:23.660 I'll just take half of you.
01:11:25.280 Look, I need one breast. 1.00
01:11:28.820 Like, it's better than anything
01:11:29.840 else I'm doing.
01:11:31.020 I just want just one breast.
01:11:33.580 The rest of you, have fun.
01:11:35.960 I just, I just, just one.
01:11:37.980 Yeah, all right.
01:11:44.800 Yeah, and whether it's an extra
01:11:46.780 male or extra female.
01:11:48.760 That's the other easy way to talk
01:11:50.480 your spouse into a three-way.
01:11:53.560 The easiest way for a husband to 0.59
01:11:55.400 talk a wife into a three-way is 1.00
01:11:57.960 say, uh, it's my best friend,
01:12:00.540 Bob.
01:12:03.920 It's going to be way easier.
01:12:05.540 No, I'm just joking.
01:12:06.300 That wouldn't be easy either.
01:12:07.740 That wouldn't be easy either.
01:12:09.800 Just joking.
01:12:11.960 Just joking.
01:12:13.120 All right.
01:12:13.440 Ladies and gentlemen, on the
01:12:14.800 other platforms,
01:12:17.980 Dennis Miller's comment on Trump.
01:12:23.800 I don't know which ones those
01:12:25.200 were.
01:12:26.800 Just looking at some of your
01:12:28.080 messages here to see if I missed
01:12:29.400 anything.
01:12:31.220 All right.
01:12:32.900 Sean Strickland.
01:12:34.140 Don't know that story.
01:12:36.300 Uh, do an episode of 3D
01:12:38.700 printing guns.
01:12:40.180 What is there to say about that?
01:12:43.560 Wouldn't everybody already know
01:12:44.960 everything there is to know about
01:12:46.260 3D printing guns?
01:12:48.120 Yes, you can do it.
01:12:51.300 Government won't like it.
01:12:53.300 I mean, there's not much to say
01:12:54.480 that isn't kind of obvious.
01:12:55.660 All right.
01:12:58.000 Thanks for joining on YouTube and,
01:13:00.000 um,
01:13:02.340 on, uh,
01:13:03.600 Rumble and on the X platform.
01:13:05.700 And I'll see you tomorrow.
01:13:06.860 Same time, same place.
01:13:07.740 All right.
01:13:16.240 V buff.
01:13:16.700 Let's see.
01:13:17.560 See you next time.
01:13:17.940 Bye.
01:13:18.020 Bye.
01:13:18.760 Bye.
01:13:18.860 Bye.
01:13:19.320 Bye.
01:13:19.700 Bye.
01:13:20.180 Bye.
01:13:20.380 Bye.
01:13:21.000 Bye.
01:13:21.460 Bye.
01:13:21.500 Bye.
01:13:22.980 Bye.
01:13:23.680 Bye.
01:13:23.900 Bye.
01:13:24.100 Bye.
01:13:25.000 Bye.
01:13:25.680 Bye.
01:13:25.960 Bye.
01:13:26.020 Bye.
01:13:26.100 Bye.
01:13:26.620 Bye.
01:13:26.920 Bye.
01:13:31.360 Bye.
01:13:31.640 Bye.
01:13:33.740 Bye.
01:13:34.300 Bye.
01:13:34.960 Bye.
01:13:35.700 Bye.