Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2365 CWSA 01⧸26⧸24

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:12.840 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm pretty sure nothing better has ever happened

00:00:17.020 in the history of the universe.

00:00:19.300 If you'd like your experience to go up to levels, which nobody can even understand,

00:00:23.520 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or a stein, a canteen jug

00:00:27.320 or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:33.360 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here today, the thing that

00:00:37.660 makes everything better, including my audio. It's called The Simultaneous Sip, and it happens

00:00:43.200 now. Go.

00:00:50.680 Oh, we already have a complainer about the audio on the locals. Now you know the rule.

00:00:57.320 If you complain about the audio during the show, I turn it off. Do you think you can hold

00:01:05.020 it for a minute? Because you don't have to be an asshole in the first five seconds. All

00:01:10.660 right, I get it. You canceled your subscription. Now you've said it. Now shut the fuck up.

00:01:17.900 Okay? Good. All right. We're all on the same page. All right. There's some interesting story

00:01:25.820 about Vince McMahon. Has anybody seen the Vince McMahon story? I'm not even going to tell you

00:01:33.360 what the claim is. But if you want to see something disgusting, I don't recommend you Google it.

00:01:39.600 I don't recommend it. But if you can't stand it, and you've just got to find out what somebody is

00:01:47.160 saying about Vince McMahon, I guarantee you none of it's true. All right. So I'm not even going to

00:01:54.920 tell you what the claim is. But there's a woman making a claim. And let me just tell you this. 0.99

00:01:59.400 As a public figure, I know what a stalker, crazy woman claim looks like, because they have a certain 1.00

00:02:07.500 quality about them. And I've received many. And I tell you often about the woman in Canada who I've

00:02:15.120 never met, who claims that I go up to Canada and ransack her apartment and rape her on a regular 0.99

00:02:20.780 basis. And she calls all the people I've ever worked with to tell them I go to Canada to rape her. 1.00

00:02:25.880 That's a normal occurrence for a public figure. This is to have crazy people come up with insane

00:02:35.800 stories about things you allegedly did. Because once it gets in people's head, they can't get it

00:02:40.680 out. It's terrible. So without telling you any of the details that are just disgusting about Vince

00:02:47.760 McMahon, no, no, he didn't do those things. I don't have to be in the room to know that this shit,

00:02:54.720 well, I shouldn't use that word, to know it didn't happen. It didn't happen. That's my version of it.

00:03:02.440 How about that story about the woman who took two bong hits and claims it caused a psychosis that

00:03:09.380 caused her to stab her boyfriend 118 times and then stabbed her dog to death and then tried to kill

00:03:15.420 herself by stabbing herself. And so she got a light sentence for being temporarily insane, triggered by

00:03:27.740 the marijuana. Now, here's what you need to know about that story. It's not exactly what you think.

00:03:36.400 It's not really saying that the marijuana made her do it. If you read it that way,

00:03:41.120 that was too much. It's sort of saying that the marijuana triggered it.

00:03:48.280 So

00:03:48.540 let me tell you this without being any kind of a medical expert.

00:03:53.860 There's no way in the world that two bongs makes you stab somebody 118 times. 0.81

00:03:59.280 That's not a thing. That's definitely not a thing. However, it could be that it triggered a psychotic

00:04:09.280 episode. Could be. I don't know one way or the other. But I can imagine that some event,

00:04:15.600 especially paranoia, would trigger you if you were already nuts. So the important thing is that the

00:04:23.940 the weed didn't make her nuts, apparently there was some, you know, nuttiness that was just basic to her. 1.00

00:04:31.300 But it's possible that, you know, the most recent thing that happened before she went nuts was a couple

00:04:36.800 of bong hits. So I think the judge who was saying too much by connecting the bong hits to the psychosis.

00:04:45.140 But it might have had some kind of introductory triggering mechanism. I don't know if it did or

00:04:52.460 didn't. But it doesn't seem impossible. Yeah, what seems far more likely is if the bong hits had 0.87

00:04:59.560 anything to do with it, they were laced with some other kind of drug. But I would think they would have

00:05:04.420 tested for that. So I feel like it would be part of the story. But I don't know. Anyway, I wouldn't I

00:05:10.380 wouldn't think that two bong hits makes anybody stab their boyfriend. That's not really a thing.

00:05:17.520 A few minutes ago, Dilbert was trending on X. Why do you think Dilbert was trending?

00:05:26.200 It was because women were really mad at me. So a number of women were reposting one of my posts. 1.00

00:05:34.140 And their comments were not about the content of it. There was no argument about my point of view.

00:05:41.620 There rarely is. Do you know what the what the attacks on me usually are? Let me quote some.

00:05:52.320 Can you believe this is the guy that used to make Dilbert? And that's it. How about what's wrong

00:06:00.980 with my opinion? Or is there something I left out? Is there an important context that should be

00:06:07.180 considered when reading my opinion? No. People just want people to know that I'm a horrible person.

00:06:14.660 No reasons given. I'm just the person who used to do Dilbert. Ha ha ha. But what they don't understand

00:06:22.960 is that I'm an energy monster who's already been canceled. So just send your energy my way.

00:06:29.500 Do you know what part of this story I remember? Dilbert was trending on X. Do you know what part of the

00:06:37.640 story I don't give a fuck about? What they were complaining about? I don't care. But they send me a lot of

00:06:46.000 traffic. Thank you. Appreciate it. Well, apparently there were some deep fake Biden robocalls. So

00:06:54.780 allegedly somebody used some AI software to do a fake Biden robocall that was telling people,

00:07:02.920 I don't know, not to vote or something. And I guess Eleven Labs was the AI app that they used,

00:07:10.300 people assume. But here's the interesting part. Eleven Labs, which allows you to clone somebody's

00:07:15.920 voice in much that manner. So it was probably their software. They also have a piece of software

00:07:21.940 to help you detect a fake. That's kind of, that seems like a good management thing that they decided

00:07:33.040 if they're going to make things that cause people to be confused, they would also make the tool to

00:07:39.040 check it. And it'll tell you if it's made by their company. That's a pretty good product. But there's

00:07:44.620 a separate product that does the same thing called, let's see, maybe I didn't write that down. But

00:07:53.320 there's another app that can do that as well. So the good news is if you wonder if something is real

00:08:00.400 or fake, voice wise, you do have a way to check it. So you could just Google how to check it.

00:08:08.240 But this raises an interesting question. Isn't it the weirdest coincidence in the world?

00:08:14.900 Or is it that at exactly the time Biden is declining to the point where he can barely

00:08:20.840 go in public, his campaign will largely involve hiding, that there emerges a technology that can

00:08:29.260 completely clone a person's, you know, look and, and voice. And it makes me wonder how long could

00:08:40.220 Biden be deceased before the public would find out? Now that used to be just sort of like an obvious

00:08:46.900 joke, you know, like a weekend at Bernie's, you know, so it's like the oldest, weakest joke in the

00:08:53.800 world. But what's different is this is the first time in history you could really do it.

00:08:59.260 Like, honest to God, you could just have a video of Biden that people thought was real.

00:09:07.320 And it wasn't. And as long as he doesn't do live events, if he stays in his basement campaigning,

00:09:14.940 and just puts out videos and statements, how would you even know? I mean, other than his little

00:09:22.260 fake jog to his helicopter every now and then, how would you ever know? He could be, he could be dead

00:09:27.560 for days. And you would have no idea. You would still think he was doing the job. So that's a real

00:09:34.540 thing. Well, Leah Thomas, famous trans swimmer. I see that Riley Gaines, who speaks out about the

00:09:43.160 trans swimmers and, or the trans athletes in women's sports. He's taking legal action against the

00:09:50.740 world aquatics because they banned him from competing in the women's category. But if he wins,

00:09:58.340 it could potentially create a precedent and open up a spot on women's Olympic teams. 1.00

00:10:06.740 So we might be on the cusp of America winning everything in women's sports because we just 0.99

00:10:15.080 send our trans athletes. Now, I can't think of anything that would be more fun than watching 1.00

00:10:22.420 our trans athletes win every medal in the Olympics. Now, you could say that would be a travesty. 1.00

00:10:28.960 And it would be, in a way. And you could say that would be terribly unfair to the hardworking

00:10:35.480 young Olympian women who are American, who should have gotten those spots but didn't. To which I say,

00:10:42.860 nobody cares about the Olympics. If you spent your entire life getting ready for the Olympics,

00:10:48.340 you wasted your time. What a complete waste of energy, preparing for the Olympics.

00:10:55.640 When I see people in the Olympics, I feel sorry for them. I think, God, your life must have been

00:11:00.240 terrible. Like, getting up at four in the morning. And then really, your whole shot was that if you

00:11:06.240 don't do well in the Olympics, it was all wasted. I have no respect for anybody who is practicing for

00:11:13.280 the Olympics. No respect. It's just a complete waste of energy. And it's so for yourself. It's like,

00:11:21.120 oh, I've got to be the gold medal winner. What did that do for anybody? Anyway, that's my personal

00:11:29.940 thing. So I'd love to see and embrace and amplify where the Olympics becomes nothing but trans athletes.

00:11:36.900 Because it would make me watch the Olympics for the first time. I mean, I used to when everything

00:11:43.260 was boring. But as soon as other entertainment became interesting, you know, like my smartphone

00:11:48.100 and stuff. Why would anybody watch the Olympics? The Olympics, I don't think it can last in the long

00:11:55.400 run. Doesn't seem like it's interesting enough. Yeah, it doesn't really do anything for you. If you're

00:12:01.280 already connected, if your countries are already connected by the internet and travel, you don't

00:12:06.900 really need an Olympics. You know, the Olympics was sort of a way for countries to get along.

00:12:12.780 It doesn't really fit anymore. Doesn't make sense.

00:12:17.520 Well, as you know, millions of military-age men are streaming across our southern border

00:12:23.520 and possibly forming paramilitary and terrorist organizations to take down the country in October

00:12:30.660 7th fashion. And that's pretty bad. That's pretty bad. But not nearly the trouble that Canada

00:12:37.360 has. Canada had Tucker Carlson giving a speech in Canada. And if you were to listen to

00:12:48.740 Trudeau, who some people call Castro's illegitimate son, who some people call Castrato,

00:13:00.660 which is pretty funny if you think about it, he's all melting down and angry about Tucker

00:13:08.160 Carlson visiting Canada. And apparently Trudeau has met with some other powerful people to

00:13:14.740 see how they can survive if Trump becomes president. Yeah, you like that? Castrato. It's a keeper.

00:13:23.580 People have to look it up. But once you look it up, it's pretty funny.

00:13:30.660 Anyway, so yeah, poor Canada. They had to deal with Tucker Carlson in his free speech, in his

00:13:38.820 opinions. He's going to bring down the great northern country of Canada with his opinions.

00:13:46.020 He's a danger to the world, but not as much as Donald Trump returning to the presidency.

00:13:54.620 Run away. Be afraid. Well, here's something I don't understand. And no matter how many times

00:14:01.000 it's in the news, I'm going to say I don't understand it. Inflation is coming down. How?

00:14:07.600 How? How? How is that even possible? Can anybody explain how inflation can come down? Is it just

00:14:18.780 lies? Yeah, maybe it's election year lies. I know. I mean, it is true that the price of gas is down

00:14:31.620 from what it used to be. From what it used to be. Oops. I just had a look at that. All right. I just

00:14:46.920 got to compliment by text. Well, so, you know, I keep telling you this. I have a degree in economics,

00:14:56.300 and I don't know how inflation can be coming down. You know, in what world do you have, you know,

00:15:03.120 death through the roof and all that, and so much money was pumped into the economy, and inflation's

00:15:10.020 coming down. I don't know. I don't quite get it. Because we have full employment. Like, none of this

00:15:18.140 makes sense. So there's something deeply mysterious about it all, and it could be that we don't understand

00:15:24.060 economics. It could be that there's some other distortion in our system that could be a problem

00:15:30.240 later that we just haven't noticed yet. I'm a little worried about this, honestly. Inflation coming

00:15:37.080 down, if it's not true, is a sign of a much bigger thing, a bigger problem. Yeah, it could be just the

00:15:45.300 election year. All right. Let's talk about that. Weaponized Department of Justice. I saw a post by

00:15:53.560 amuse. So, you know, Peter Navarro, who was on the Trump staff, but he refused to do testimony to

00:16:04.060 the illegitimate January 6th committee, who lost all the records of the testimony, lost half of the

00:16:10.380 records, the illegitimate January 6th committee, because he said that it would violate Trump's

00:16:16.680 immunity, because Navarro was, you know, under the Trump, you know, staff, basically. Now, that was

00:16:24.760 rejected. And so he's going to go to prison for, what, four months? Now, does that sound like

00:16:32.760 something that would have happened to a Democrat? No. There's not a fucking chance a Democrat would have

00:16:40.260 gone to jail for this. This is the weaponized Department of Justice. If I didn't already have

00:16:45.480 enough reason to support Trump, I was to support Trump just for this fucking thing, just for putting

00:16:51.300 Peter Navarro in jail. This, Peter Navarro is me. He's fucking me. If they're putting Peter Navarro in

00:16:59.240 jail for bullshit, there's nothing protecting you. So I'm down for the United States of Texas.

00:17:06.860 The federal government has fucking lost it. They do not have my support. They do not have my support.

00:17:14.160 I've never said that before. Yeah. The American government has just lost its entire legitimacy

00:17:20.620 with the public. You put Peter Navarro in jail for one fucking day, and I'm done with the United States.

00:17:28.460 You know, as a respectable institution, I mean, I'm not going to move because I still like the weather.

00:17:36.040 I like the health care and the weather. It's hard to move. But oh my God, I have no respect for the

00:17:41.340 government whatsoever. This is a travesty, a crime of, honestly, I don't think anything's bothered me

00:17:49.760 more. That this Peter Navarro thing, because it's so personal, you know, that there's a person who

00:17:57.080 was just trying to do his job. This guy was working for the government. You think he did that for the

00:18:02.560 paycheck? You think he took a job working for Trump because he thought that was like his good

00:18:08.420 paycheck? No. He was serving the country in a way that I'm almost positive he thought was helping.

00:18:15.060 And he goes to fucking jail for it. All right. Let me say this. If Trump gets in office, I do want

00:18:21.220 him to get revenge. I do want him to get revenge. And not because of revenge is a good thing.

00:18:27.720 Not because it's a good thing. You just need mutually assured destruction. Whoever's behind the stuff like

00:18:35.040 this, the January 6th committee, they all belong in jail. The January 6th committee

00:18:41.600 belong in jail. And if Trump could do it, I would back that completely. Because they did an illegitimate

00:18:49.520 process. They knew it. They lost or encrypted half of the notes. And they're putting this guy in jail.

00:18:58.200 And the entire thing was an op. January 6th through the committee was all an op. Every one of these

00:19:05.400 people belong in jail. And you could call it revenge, but you need mutually assured destruction.

00:19:12.800 You do this to Peter Navarro, and I'm in favor of our government coming for you.

00:19:17.880 Just for this. Just for Peter. Yeah, this one's too personal. This isn't the news. The Navarro thing is

00:19:27.360 purely personal. This is me against the government, because I just feel like I'm him. I feel like I'm in

00:19:33.860 that jail. So I back Texas, and I back Peter Navarro, and fuck the government. You've just lost it.

00:19:43.920 Anyway. Would you like to see how the Washington Post works with Biden to smear a critic?

00:20:01.720 That sounds like business as usual. All right, so this is the Washington Post reports that some

00:20:08.060 Biden friends, you know, people on his team, met to try to figure out how to go after the public

00:20:16.620 critics of the Bidens, you know, especially the criminal bribery allegations. And one of those

00:20:24.240 is Jonathan Turley, who is writing about it. Now, here's the interesting thing. Why would the

00:20:30.140 Washington Post that is very pro-Biden, why would they write a story about a secret meeting

00:20:38.540 between people who were going to try to smear public people and maybe do lawsuits and go after

00:20:48.060 them? Why would they do that? There's only one reason. There's no way this little group of people

00:20:55.160 could not have kept this a secret. It obviously was part of the operation that the news would cover

00:21:01.720 it. So they get the least ethical group. The Washington Post were not really, I wouldn't call

00:21:07.640 them a serious newspaper or anything. They're just basically a Democrat tool. And so they write this

00:21:16.580 story that normally nobody would have access to because it's part of the op. The op is to scare

00:21:22.740 people to stop talking about Biden above any potential crimes. That's a real thing that's

00:21:28.860 happening. And you're watching it. Now, if you didn't know the players, you wouldn't know this

00:21:34.940 was happening. Because if you didn't know that the Washington Post is not a legitimate news source,

00:21:40.160 it's just a Democrat tool, you would say, oh, looks like they got a scoop. No, probably not.

00:21:47.440 You know, I wasn't there. But probably the most likely explanation is that they're part of the op

00:21:55.680 and they're part of scaring people away from free speech. That's right. It's just another one of many

00:22:03.320 efforts to suppress free speech, to make it illegal. So do you think they're going to do a Peter Navarro

00:22:11.000 on Turley? You know, find something that they can get him for illegally? Yes. It looks like they're

00:22:19.000 going to go after him because he's the best voice for this legal stuff, you know, that is read by

00:22:27.300 Republicans, at least. So everything about this, you should be worried about.

00:22:32.900 All right. I would like to now, I'd like to cause some trouble. This might be one of the reasons

00:22:47.260 Dilbert was trending today. They don't like to use my name. So they trend Dilbert instead. So I get

00:22:53.740 less attention. But here's something that I proposed today on the X platform. And I'm serious about it.

00:23:02.900 So just listen to this. All right. Here's a reframe for understanding basically everything

00:23:09.820 wrong with the country. All right. Here's a big reframe. We think we have racial and political

00:23:16.340 divide. We do not. We have a broken mating system. Marriage in particular is broken. Now, I didn't write

00:23:27.860 this, but I'll say it now. One of the best frames for understanding the world is energy.

00:23:35.280 If energy is taken from some situation, it doesn't disappear. It just gets transferred.

00:23:44.840 You know, energy doesn't get destroyed. It's just a quality of physics. So if energy is removed from

00:23:51.900 one situation, it's got to go somewhere. There are a whole bunch of more single people than there ever

00:23:58.300 have been. And so the energy that society used to give pretty much to their family, you know,

00:24:05.300 their greatest energy, they don't have that outlet anymore. So where'd all that energy go?

00:24:11.380 What happens to all the energy that a species that was designed for mating, if they can't do the

00:24:20.400 primary thing they're designed for by a million years of evolution, where's the energy go?

00:24:26.940 All right. Where does it go? It doesn't go away. It goes somewhere. And you're watching that happen

00:24:34.500 in real time. The energy is going in two different directions. Now, you saw that in a number of

00:24:41.980 countries, including the U.S., South Korea, Germany, and Great Britain, that women are becoming more 0.98

00:24:50.360 progressive and men are becoming more conservative, like a lot. It's like a big divide. What's driving

00:24:58.560 that? It's also the failure of the marriage and mating process. Now, marriage as a proxy for the 0.98

00:25:06.680 mating strategy in general is what you want to think of. So it's not about the rules and the laws around

00:25:13.960 marriage. It's about the mating instinct, which marriage used to handle. Now, I go on. When men and

00:25:23.360 women have adequate mating strategies, they put their focus on mating. And in so doing, they become 1.00

00:25:29.940 biologically satisfied. Or at least it keeps them busy. All right. I'm not saying everybody who has

00:25:37.060 kids is delighted about it. But at least it keeps them busy. You know, their energy is going to a

00:25:43.260 productive thing for society. But when mating strategies fail for a variety of social reasons, 0.93

00:25:49.640 like now, you know, you have everything from only fans to women are working and earning their own 1.00

00:25:57.160 money to you can have a kid and a wedlock to you name it. Basically, all the forces that make

00:26:06.020 marriage less valuable than it used to be. So when mating strategies fail, two things happen. Men become

00:26:13.000 dangerous and women become batshit crazy. And those women, if you believe biology, 1.00

00:26:19.640 the women would be doing things that would give them more access to sperm. 1.00

00:26:28.920 So what you would expect is that the men who don't have a purpose would become dangerous.

00:26:35.860 And sure enough, it seems like there are a lot of single dangerous men streaming across the border,

00:26:41.440 starting wars in other countries, et cetera.

00:26:43.020 But for women, their primary incentive is to get closer to sperm, which is carried in humans. 1.00

00:26:54.220 So if you look at all the things that women are backing, when the traditional mating strategy of 0.96

00:27:02.640 marriage doesn't quite work anymore, suddenly women are in favor of open borders. Now, this is a 1.00

00:27:10.620 generalization. It has to do with Democrats, not Republicans. It's not every Democrat. But if you

00:27:16.800 took the single women out of the mix, we wouldn't have open borders. Do you all agree with that? 0.99

00:27:22.700 You know, on average, if you took women out of the Democratic Party, the men would say, you know what,

00:27:29.540 we probably ought to close these borders. So it's mostly a male-female problem, 1.00

00:27:34.340 not a politics problem, and not even a race problem. Now, what about DEI? If you're a woman and you want 1.00

00:27:43.620 to get closer to sperm, does DEI do it? It does. Because without DEI, women might be relegated to 1.00

00:27:52.160 women-only jobs where there are fewer men. But DEI puts the woman in the executive suite surrounded by 1.00

00:27:59.720 high-quality men with good sperm. It also guarantees that, uh, masculine men from other races are coming

00:28:07.480 in. Right? So, so I believe that women are pursuing a mating strategy that is best embedded in the 1.00

00:28:17.400 progressive, um, philosophies. So, uh, everything about bringing in literally millions of young mating,

00:28:28.280 uh, uh, level men, I believe is a mating strategy. It's just that we believe it's politics or we

00:28:35.080 believe it's race or we believe it's something else. I think it's a mating strategy. Right? Now,

00:28:42.180 if you looked at who is, uh, providing all the resources and charity for the immigrants who are

00:28:49.680 arriving, I don't know. Well, I'll bet there are more women. Does anybody know that? I mean, 1.00

00:28:56.460 the prediction would be that the people who are taking care of the zillions of men coming in would

00:29:02.840 be more women than men. Because again, they would be getting close to sperm. Now, I'm not saying that 0.95

00:29:10.580 to be disgusting. I'm just being biologically specific. That, that they have a million years

00:29:17.500 of evolution that makes them have to be near sperm. Because it's just a biological imperative,

00:29:23.660 which they may not consciously be aware of. So, here's the problem. Every time we talk about the

00:29:31.000 problem, the crisis on the border, do you know what we inaccurately say? Actually, it's accurate.

00:29:37.240 But it's the wrong frame. What we say is, they're all military-age men. That's true. And it's a very

00:29:46.340 big risk. But you know what we're missing? The base, the base problem. The base problem is that they're

00:29:53.780 all reproduction-age men. And that's why they're coming in. Because our women are fed up with the 0.99

00:30:00.860 men in this country and with marriage. And they're just saying, let's just open the fucking border and let,

00:30:06.420 you know, 10 million young men who look like they have testosterone come in.

00:30:14.220 So, what you think is Democrats versus Republicans is not that. It's, that's a downstream effect.

00:30:22.840 Do you remember Andrew Breitbart's famous thing that politics is downstream from culture?

00:30:28.280 Well, culture just got rid of our best mating strategy, marriage. And so, what's downstream from

00:30:39.000 that culture now looks like we have a Democrat versus Republican problem, and we don't. What we

00:30:46.340 have is women trying to get closer to sperm, men who don't have a purpose, which makes them dangerous, 0.98

00:30:51.960 and, and we're acting like it's some other problem. The base problem is that we don't have mating

00:31:00.520 strategies for either men or women that are as good as they used to be. And that energy is going

00:31:07.280 somewhere else. And a lot of it is to fix the problem. So, women are trying to fix the problem 1.00

00:31:12.760 by bringing in so many men that their odds of reproduction go up. If you're a woman who can't 1.00

00:31:20.580 get a guy, but you would like to get married, do you think you have a better chance if you bring

00:31:25.880 in 10 million men from other countries and no women? Yes. The, the math suggests that if you add 10

00:31:34.940 million men to the equation and no women, you know, obviously there are women coming across the border, 1.00

00:31:40.280 but, you know, on average it's men, uh, your odds of finding a man of some sort who has testosterone

00:31:48.100 and can make you a baby is much better. So every day that we think this is some kind of a Congress

00:31:55.880 problem or a Democrat problem, or it's a political problem, or it's a race problem, those are all true. 0.79

00:32:04.520 It's all of those things. And it's a crime problem and a terrorism problem. All true. But the base

00:32:11.240 problem is that we don't have a mating system that works. And everything else is downstream from that.

00:32:19.900 So let's see who knows that we have a problem. Well, let's say Bill Ackman, um, who is not a Republican

00:32:27.660 has famously said, and he said it again today on X, that, uh, the current immigration crisis

00:32:34.420 would, should guarantee Biden losing in the landslide, which is what he doesn't want. I mean,

00:32:40.420 he wants a Democrat to win, but not Biden necessarily. So Bill Ackman, who is male and Democrat

00:32:46.540 says, Oh no, close the border. RFK Jr. Who's running for president and his Democrat

00:32:53.800 says loudly and clearly close the border, right? Because he's a man. And that's more important

00:33:04.860 than the Democrat part. Um, how about Obama and Biden in 2007? Both Obama and Biden were very much

00:33:13.580 against illegal immigration in 2007, uh, back when they were both men. Obama is still probably a man

00:33:21.240 and still opposed to this level of, and Biden's neither a man nor a woman. He's, he's more like a

00:33:27.280 cadaver. But what about the women? Well, let's look at a recent Supreme Court ruling. Supreme,

00:33:36.380 recent Supreme Court ruling 154 that, um, the federal government could, uh, take down some of the

00:33:43.980 barbaric systems. But, um, all four of the women on the Supreme Court voted for less security on the 1.00

00:33:58.180 border. Now, John Roberts voted with them. They gave them the majority, five to four. Um,

00:34:06.020 yeah, well, let's sip to that 34 minute glitch.

00:34:08.200 All right, we're going to sip to the glitch. We don't know what it is, but at 34 minutes into my,

00:34:14.060 um, live stream every day, there's some kind of a technical glitch. Sip to the glitch, sip to the

00:34:21.020 glitch. That's a good idea. We're going to use that energy. All right. So the men who are Democrats

00:34:33.420 and prominent and willing to speak out, uh, you know, Ackman, RFK Jr., even Obama earlier were

00:34:40.140 against illegal immigration being out of control. And the four, four out of four women on the Supreme

00:34:48.060 Court voted for something that would make us less secure at the border. And then John Roberts joined

00:34:53.880 him. But he's, it's not unusual for him to, you know, be a, an unusual vote. So I feel like every,

00:35:03.240 every sign is pointing in the same direction that we have a mating, a broken mating system. And all of

00:35:11.700 it is just fucking up the whole country. Everything is based on that. Everything. All right. Um,

00:35:19.940 so let me say this cause I haven't weighed in on this yet. In 2016, I was opposed to mass deportation

00:35:33.180 and a lot of you gave me a hard time and you were all pretty angry about it because you liked the mass

00:35:40.260 deportation. And I get it. Yeah. I would not even criticize you for your opinion. We had a different

00:35:48.120 opinion about whether we could absorb them and, you know, what was, what was the more American

00:35:54.120 thing to do, you know, given that we're an immigrant country. And those are actually honest

00:35:58.400 disagreements. However, I was operating under the assumption that it wasn't so many immigrants that

00:36:05.760 we couldn't absorb them. It wasn't a perfect system, but you know, if we just stopped the extra

00:36:12.360 ones from coming in, we would absorb the ones that were here. They got jobs, they want to work, 0.98

00:36:18.120 that they have American character, you know, family, religion, work, you know, I like all those

00:36:25.900 things. So I'm very pro, um, specifically, uh, central American and Mexican immigrants. And part of

00:36:33.820 that is emotional because I have, I have lots of contact with that community, you know, as Californians

00:36:42.120 do, and they're all awesome. I mean, I have universal, super positive experiences with the

00:36:49.160 immigrant community. Most of them are working. Uh, they often work for me in various capacities,

00:36:55.200 you know, in, you know, if I need help and whatever, there's always, seems like there's always somebody

00:37:00.900 from another country who's doing the work. So for me, the immigration, uh, had more positive than maybe

00:37:06.940 you could see. And so we would have a disagreement on that. However, that said that was 2016 and it's

00:37:17.660 not irrelevant. The rate of people coming in, that's really relevant. So, uh, officially I would

00:37:25.840 like to reverse my opinion on mass deportation. I think every person who came in, uh, not from Mexico,

00:37:33.780 not from Mexico, but every person who came in, not from Mexico during the Biden administration, I think

00:37:41.740 they need to go home. I think they need to be mass deported. Now, what we'll end up with is probably a

00:37:50.240 more targeted deporting. I think what we'll really do is we'll try really hard to vet people. If somebody

00:37:57.860 already has a job, we're going to say, ah, okay, you do have a job. So I guess you can stay. That's

00:38:05.680 probably how it'll turn out. Cause you know, in the end politics is compromise, but I don't think that

00:38:13.040 works because if you don't kick out every single one that came during the Biden administration, not

00:38:20.560 counting the Mexicans, cause I am treating them as special and superior, uh, superior in the sense 1.00

00:38:28.500 that Mexico's our neighbor and the Mexicans coming in are almost entirely just want work and a good 1.00

00:38:36.480 life. The people coming from other countries might actually be here for military reasons. And I don't 1.00

00:38:43.100 have any patience for sorting out the good ones from the bad ones. None. Now I get that Mexico might send 0.51

00:38:49.960 some MS-13 people too, but that's, that's a risk so far we've been able to, to manage. And I'm,

00:38:56.760 I'm more pro Mexico and pro Mexicans than I am pro anybody from anywhere else who, who doesn't have 1.00

00:39:04.960 American interests. Cause the thing about the Mexicans that come in, besides the fact that they're good 1.00

00:39:10.540 Americans, you know, almost all the time, except for MS-13, um, is that they, they have a stake in 0.82

00:39:19.260 America succeeding? Cause there's no way Mexico does well if America fails, but people coming from, 1.00

00:39:27.260 you know, the Middle East, maybe they don't care if Mexico and the United States fail. So there, there's a

00:39:33.900 whole, I have a whole different level of feeling about the Mexican immigrants and I might extend that to

00:39:39.700 Central America. Uh, you know, once you get to Venezuela, there's a question about them emptying the

00:39:45.600 prisons. So, you know, maybe I'd cut it off with Central America, but where I'm at is we probably 0.95

00:39:52.920 have to send 10 million people back minimum. So I want to be as clear as possible that this is a

00:40:00.160 reversal of opinion, but not because my opinion changed is because the facts changed. And now the

00:40:06.760 facts are it's an un, it's just an unacceptable flow. We can't have that. So Trump says, uh, you know, mass

00:40:17.340 deportations. And the first time he said it, I didn't think he was going to do it. And he didn't, which is one of the

00:40:23.300 reasons I supported him. Cause I didn't think he meant it when he said he was going to deport 25 million

00:40:28.700 people. It didn't seem possible, but deporting all of these people, it is possible. The ones who came 0.99

00:40:34.840 in the last four years, uh, and I support it. So weirdly I supported Trump the first time because I

00:40:43.980 didn't think in part, because I didn't think he would really deport and he didn't. Now I think he

00:40:49.700 will. And so I support him because he will. Um, I don't think anybody else would. All right.

00:40:56.620 And then there's a photo of the Utah Democrats, uh, dressed in all black to mourn the passing of a

00:41:05.460 bill that banned men from girls' bathrooms and banned DEI from public education. Were most of the

00:41:13.160 people who thought that was the most important issue of the day, were most of them women? Yes,

00:41:18.820 they were. There were a few men hiding in the back, but basically it was a, you know, it seemed to be led

00:41:23.800 and organized by women. So there again, the men are assembling to defend the border and the women

00:41:30.980 are complaining about, uh, that men can't use the girls' bathrooms. Now when they say men, 0.63

00:41:36.760 we're really talking about trans. So that's what their, their big issue was. So what, uh, what do you

00:41:44.860 get if, um, trans people use girls' bathrooms? It puts women closer to sperm, right? Every time you 1.00

00:41:56.080 put somebody who has sperm in their body in a woman's competition, women are closer to sperm. Now, 1.00

00:42:02.840 is it a mating strategy that they want trans to use the bathrooms? Not consciously. That would be insane. 0.56

00:42:09.520 That wouldn't be any kind of conscious decision, but it has the same effect. And biologically,

00:42:16.520 I think we're driven biologically and then we rationalize things after the fact. So I don't think

00:42:22.040 it's a coincidence that every time women get involved is to increase their exposure to people 1.00

00:42:28.680 who have sperm in their little bag they're carrying around. Does that seem like a coincidence to you?

00:42:33.440 Let, let me, let me test the audience here. Cause I, I gave you quite a bit. How many of you are

00:42:41.140 accepting, or at least you're thinking about it, the idea that we have a broken mating strategy and

00:42:47.460 that it's, we see its activity in everything that's broken? All right. I got some no's. I got some yes's.

00:42:56.060 Good. Well, that's perfect for what I'm doing. If I divided you on that question, it means you're

00:43:03.460 thinking about it. Yeah. No, the, the, the bathroom one could be a coincidence, but keep looking for the

00:43:12.300 pattern. Look for the pattern that it seems like some kind of bad correction for a mating problem. 0.99

00:43:22.240 All right. Find the propaganda. Here's a test. Joe Scarborough is talking about the border bill.

00:43:33.300 So apparently there was a proposed bill to correct the border. Did you all hear that? Governor Newsom

00:43:41.200 is saying, yeah, you know, it's the Republicans. The Republicans want it as an issue. They don't want

00:43:47.300 it as a solution because we Democrats offer this, the best, the best border bill that's ever been

00:43:56.680 offered. It was the best one. And then the Republicans turned it down and there's some quote

00:44:04.200 or report that Trump had said directly, he doesn't approve of the bill. He'd rather have the issue

00:44:10.600 because he can win on the issue. Is there anything left out of the story? Did I leave anything out

00:44:19.000 like Joe Scarborough is? Let's read Joe Scarborough's take. He called it the toughest border security

00:44:27.900 bill in a generation. He said that Republicans recklessly killed the toughest border security

00:44:34.080 bill in a generation and then complain about border security because they have no shame. Is that

00:44:40.040 what happened? Was it the toughest security bill in a generation? Yes. Yes, it was. Was

00:44:52.180 the toughest bill in a generation adequate? No. No, it wasn't. He's basically saying, if you

00:45:03.160 don't accept the serial killer that only killed 10 people, I don't think you're considering that

00:45:09.660 serial killers have sometimes killed more than 10 people. So really, if you're not in favor of

00:45:16.420 murdering 10 people, you have no shame. It's actually crazy talk. Now, do you think that

00:45:24.940 Joe Scarborough is not aware that the so-called toughest bill was going to allow in, allow in,

00:45:33.160 and this doesn't even count the people that were getaways, it would allow in 1.8 million people a

00:45:38.560 year? So the bill that was supposed to fix the border specifically would make it worse because it

00:45:48.100 would make it legal for 5,000 people a day to come in and they wouldn't even start trying to catch

00:45:53.300 people or stop them until the first 5,000 walked across. That is not really a border security bill.

00:46:01.560 That's some bullshit that they tried to put together and then they tried to pair it with

00:46:06.180 the Ukraine funding. So the entire point of the border bill was to be this fake border bill

00:46:11.780 that they could say in public, hey, I know you people aren't going to read the details of the border

00:46:18.260 bill. But let me tell you, because you believe anything Democrats say, that it was a great

00:46:23.880 border bill. In fact, it was so great, it was the best one in a generation. Now, who says that?

00:46:30.920 Who says it's the best one in a generation when what you really meant to say, didn't you,

00:46:37.040 is that it would solve the border problem? Huh. Why didn't you say that bill would solve the border

00:46:45.000 problem? Since that's really the question. Nobody said, can you please compare this border bill

00:46:51.640 with historical other border bills? Nobody asked for that. They said, we have a problem. We know how

00:46:58.220 to fix it. Can you do a bill that will fix it? Well, how about the best bill in a generation?

00:47:04.080 Oh, okay. It's like you didn't even hear me. I'm saying, could you make a border bill that would stop

00:47:10.000 the flow of people coming across the border? I'll tell you what I could do for you. I'll give you

00:47:16.520 the best border bill in a generation. No, fuck you. Stop saying that. I don't want the best bill in a

00:47:22.680 generation because that's still going to be worthless. Could you do a bill that would stop the illegal 0.63

00:47:28.140 immigration? I could give you the best border bill in a generation. So that's, that's the game 0.99

00:47:37.840 they're playing. So look for that propaganda. That is your propaganda watch list. Watch for them

00:47:44.140 describing the border bill as the best one they've done in a generation. Do you know what the correct

00:47:49.820 answer is? Well, thank you for reminding me that Congress has been a piece of shit for my entire life

00:47:58.040 and there's still a piece of shit. So if your argument is that Congress has been a useless piece of

00:48:06.800 shit for my entire fucking life, yeah, it's the best bill in a generation. Congratulations. Good job.

00:48:16.120 Now, how about stopping the threat coming across the border? Oh, no. Best one in a generation. All right.

00:48:27.620 Then there's the question of, did Trump really say he wants to kill that bill so he can use it as a

00:48:34.440 political thing? And suppose he did. How do you feel about that? Suppose that was true. Suppose Trump

00:48:42.880 said, kill it because I prefer it as an issue. Ooh, is that bad? Nope. That's not bad. Because the thing

00:48:53.380 he wanted to kill was, repeat after me, the strongest bill in a generation and bullshit. He wanted to kill

00:49:03.780 bullshit because bullshit doesn't stop the border. But having it as an issue so they can't say, hey,

00:49:14.000 look, we did something. We did the best border bill. It hasn't stopped it yet, but we just started.

00:49:20.060 We just got the money. The Republicans are dragging their feet. So basically, the Democrats wanted their

00:49:26.320 own issue and not fix it. They wanted to say, hey, we've got the political solution, but not actually

00:49:33.700 solving it. Because by election day, you wouldn't know if it worked or not. They'd say, oh, I need a

00:49:38.520 little more time. It's going to work through the system. It's all taken care of. Just give us another

00:49:43.300 month after the election. Trump, quite reasonably and wisely, said that he would get a political

00:49:52.220 advantage if they don't pass that. But it's not like that was going to fix it. And he's the guy

00:49:57.940 against the fix. He's the guy against the fake fix that would allow the bad guys to win and the

00:50:04.420 borders to be open forever. So yes, he should use this as a political axe exactly the way he said.

00:50:15.080 And yes, his allies should kill that bill, which it looks like they did. So good work, Trump.

00:50:22.220 And here's some news that you're only going to hear from people like Ted Cruz and people who

00:50:31.340 understand what's going on. We don't need a new border bill. Because Trump didn't have a new border

00:50:38.800 bill and he stopped immigration. Do you know how he did it? He did the remain in Mexico policy that

00:50:46.180 Biden reversed. He was building a border wall that didn't make a difference yet. But if he'd kept

00:50:51.900 going by now, it could have made a difference. And Biden stopped it. And then Biden reinstituted

00:50:59.420 catch and release. None of those things required a border bill. They were all things that Trump did

00:51:06.740 and got away with. And they're all things that Biden undid and destroyed the country.

00:51:11.720 So even the conversation about a border bill is completely bullshit because we don't need one.

00:51:19.700 We just need to enforce the law and use executive power the way it was meant to be used. Executive

00:51:25.060 power was meant to be used exactly this way. You know, those gray area situations where you get a big

00:51:31.080 crisis and the only thing you can do is you hope your leader is strong enough to just do the hard

00:51:35.940 stuff and ask questions later. That's what it's for. You want a strong executive who's willing to take

00:51:43.260 a chance to do the right thing, you know, if maybe he has to explain it later. So that's our deal. We give

00:51:49.560 the president's power, but we know they're also taking a risk on our behalf. All right.

00:51:57.500 So I've told you that one of the best follows on the X platform is Kanakoa the Great. How many of you

00:52:09.320 are following that account if you're on X? Kanakoa the Great. I just want to see. All right. A lot of

00:52:17.400 yeses. All right. Here's what I want for you. If you're on X and you're not following this account

00:52:23.880 yet, I'd like you to do it today and today specifically. And there's a reason. I'm going

00:52:28.880 to tell you what the bad people have done to him because he's reporting on it today. He's one of

00:52:34.540 the most useful and accurate, in my opinion, independent journalists in the world, at least in

00:52:44.440 America. So he's a great asset to the country. And here's what happened to him. And now this is not a

00:52:52.060 story about what happened to one person. This is a story about how it's done. And it's called the

00:52:57.180 wrap-up smear. And it works this way generally. And that'll tell you how it worked in this case.

00:53:02.580 The way you do it is you find some organization that somebody's heard of to condemn somebody

00:53:08.640 with, you know, you call them a bad name. They could be a racist or whatever, whatever it is you could

00:53:14.040 call them. Then once any entity has made a claim, every other entity after that can then refer to

00:53:22.800 the first entity and say, well, he's an accused or a racist or whatever it is. Right? So the wrap-up

00:53:29.960 smear is somebody doing a fake news. And then the so-called legitimate news, which is also just fake

00:53:36.380 news, will refer to the first one as if that had somehow been proven. But of course, it's just bullshit.

00:53:42.120 Right? Now, given that you know that that's a real thing, and it's not just something somebody

00:53:48.500 observed, you know, by accident happened, it's an actual op. It's something people plan and execute

00:53:56.060 on a regular basis in the field of politics. Right? So now that you know it's an op and a normal one

00:54:02.880 that they run, and now that you know that they're targeting anybody who had any voice that was useful

00:54:08.460 and not on the Democrat side, Peter Navarro, for example. Right? People like me being canceled,

00:54:16.060 and you say to yourself, that wasn't political. Wasn't it? Of course it was. Yeah. Now, I gave people

00:54:22.980 a reason to cancel me, but it was still political. I mean, it wouldn't have happened otherwise.

00:54:27.980 So here's Kaneko with a great story in his own words. The New York Times is saying I'm a QAnon

00:54:38.100 influencer and an election misinformation super spreader on X. That's pretty bad. If you tie somebody

00:54:45.600 to QAnon, you're smearing them by association. And election misinformation, that's really bad.

00:54:52.660 You know. Did either of those things happen? Nope. Kaneko has no contact, no association,

00:55:03.220 nothing to do with Q. It was simply a statement that somebody made, and I'll tell you where that

00:55:09.720 came from. All right. Here's the thing that kicked it off. Kaneko with a great shared a 32-page report

00:55:16.760 on election fraud from the previous president. So Trump apparently posted something about election

00:55:22.540 fraud, and Kaneko shared it. Now, that should have been the news that everybody was sharing.

00:55:31.380 In other words, every legitimate news story should have said, are you saying that Trump is sharing a

00:55:36.780 32-page report on election fraud? Whether you believe the report or didn't, it's still the same news,

00:55:44.320 isn't it? So Kaneko with a great being an independent journalist type, reports the news. That's just

00:55:53.940 the news. So then he goes on. Rather than disproving the report, the New York Times just calls me names.

00:56:05.200 That's exactly what was happening to me when Dilbert was trending today on X. The people who were coming

00:56:11.120 after me didn't have any argument about anything. They didn't even have a disagreement that I could

00:56:15.840 find. They just came to call me names. Shouldn't people hear both sides of the debate to decide

00:56:23.500 what's true? So read the report, decide for yourself. Isn't that better than those in power labeling

00:56:30.200 anything against their narrative as misinformation and censoring it, which is our current system?

00:56:36.260 For example, CISA's emails this week show they were worried about mail-in voting but still pushed

00:56:45.120 big tech to censor users with similar worries. Doesn't that seem fair to report that the very

00:56:52.180 people who were censoring you for those concerns had the same concerns? Yeah, that seems pretty fair to

00:56:57.960 report that. Doesn't that show labeling things as misinformation is more about controlling the

00:57:05.100 narrative than the truth? Yes, it does. That's exactly what that shows. Because they were censoring

00:57:11.260 information they agreed with because it didn't work for them politically. They agreed with it and they

00:57:17.700 censored it. And it's in writing that they agreed with it and then they censored it or tried to.

00:57:25.100 And then Kenokoa says, I've written over 60 articles, made thousands of social media posts,

00:57:29.960 and got billions of online views in the last three years, and I've never promoted QAnon.

00:57:37.980 Yet Media Matters, oh, here it is. Media Matters. Huh. You ever heard that name before?

00:57:45.520 Media Matters. If you know the players, you know that Media Matters is not a legitimate

00:57:50.960 organization. They're a Democrat hit organization. So Media Matters called them a QAnon influencer.

00:57:58.260 So all the other garbage media outlets repeat their claim. Their evidence? Here's the evidence.

00:58:05.060 He shared a JFK speech and the video creator wrote the hashtag of WWG1WGA. It's sort of a QAnon hashtag

00:58:14.040 on it. Even though the video had nothing to do with QAnon. It was a JFK speech. He literally shared

00:58:22.440 a speech by a president of the United States with no commentary. But because there was a little

00:58:29.700 hashtag on it, he got called the QAnon guy. There was no QAnon anything to it. It was just literally

00:58:37.360 the president's speech unedited. All right. So now Media Matters smears them because they found that

00:58:44.200 little hidden Easter egg there. They also say I'm a QAnon influencer because I shared posts to a

00:58:53.000 Telegram page with over 50 people, some of who promoted QAnon. So in other words, he shared some

00:58:59.720 information on Telegram, but some of the people he shared it with were QAnon people. So he's being 0.79

00:59:07.200 accused for the habits of his audience. Now, my audience are all law-abiding, awesome people.

00:59:18.760 But if anybody snuck into the mix who was bad, wouldn't I be associated with that by... And that's

00:59:26.380 the same thing they do with Trump. They say, look at all these bad people supporting Trump. That can't

00:59:31.820 be a coincidence. Smear by association. As Kandikawa says, I can't control what other people

00:59:38.860 write on the internet, of course. And he says, that's also how Telegram works. I shared my post

00:59:44.260 to a handful of channels and others shared theirs. That's the whole story. He just shared some stuff

00:59:48.980 and other people shared it too. I'm not responsible for the content others post. But this is how the

00:59:55.720 game played. So Media Matters accuses them of being a QAnon influencer. Then the ADL publishes

01:00:01.300 a negative story, also labeling me a QAnon influencer. So now you've got two sources.

01:00:07.380 Well, if you don't believe Media Matters, you're certainly going to believe the ADL. You've heard

01:00:12.060 of them, right? So they wouldn't lie to you, would they? Well, let me tell you, the ADL,

01:00:17.740 the president of the ADL this year, well, within the last year, said in public that I'm a Holocaust

01:00:26.360 denier. Now, I'm not a Holocaust denier. I've never even met one. Literally, I've never met

01:00:33.560 one. I don't even know what that's all about. But do you think the ADL is a credible organization?

01:00:40.100 No, they're just a democratic organization, like Media Matters. But if you have two of them

01:00:46.320 agreeing with each other, and they're names you think you've heard, Media Matters. I feel like I've

01:00:51.800 heard of them. Well, if they're saying it, well, oh, but the ADL agrees. Oh, okay. Well, now you got

01:00:58.380 Media Matters, you got the ADL. That's a lot of evidence there. But that's not all. Subsequently,

01:01:05.780 and then Business Insider attacks Elon Musk for engaging with a supposed QAnon influencer,

01:01:13.880 citing Media Matters and the ADL. Now, remember, the ADL also targeted Elon Musk,

01:01:19.100 and now Business Insider is going to use the ADL and Media Matters as their source. Because as Bill

01:01:26.980 Ackman said today on X, Business Insider is basically just a cesspool. I'm paraphrasing. But

01:01:34.580 even Bill Ackman, Democrat, said no, Business Insider is just a fucking cesspool. It's nothing close to

01:01:41.160 being any kind of a legitimate media source. Following suit, Forbes claims QAnon influencers

01:01:51.140 are gaining traction on X. And they reference Business Insider. See how it's done? Media Matters

01:02:00.600 just makes something up, you know, based on some hashtag. Then ADL backs them, and now it's legitimate.

01:02:07.040 So Business Insider piles on. Now it's more legitimate. These are all just Democrat organs.

01:02:14.020 And then Forbes, which is now a Democrat organ. It didn't used to be. But Forbes, I think it was

01:02:20.220 sold by the Forbes family. But it turns into just garbage at this point. Forbes is. So Forbes is just

01:02:26.600 Democrat garbage. And then the Washington Post, the New York Times, and other media outlets,

01:02:31.320 then they cite Forbes and Business Insider to perpetuate the narrative. In reality, the corporate

01:02:39.200 media uses personal attacks, blah, blah. It's propaganda, not journalism. Now, do you see how they

01:02:45.600 laundered the fake news? If the only place it appears was Media Matters, that's the lowest level of

01:02:52.440 credibility, because even Democrats know that that's just propaganda, right? There's no, I don't think

01:02:58.740 there's any Democrat who understands politics who thinks Media Matters is some kind of a journalistic

01:03:03.960 enterprise. So then the ADL, which has a slightly better reputation than Media Matters, because

01:03:11.420 people don't know that maybe they used to be good, but they're definitely just corrupt and evil and

01:03:16.820 malevolent Democrat force at this point. So now ADL adds a little credibility, because people don't,

01:03:23.200 haven't caught on to what the ADL is up to. And that allows Business Insider, that is the, is just a

01:03:30.820 little bit more credible, but shouldn't be, than the ADL. So now you've, you've ratcheted up your

01:03:36.880 credibility from the worst, Media Matters, to just slightly better, but terrible ADL, to just maybe

01:03:45.600 slightly better Business Insider. But now you're talking about something everybody's heard of.

01:03:50.640 Huh. Maybe you didn't know what the ADL was. Maybe you didn't know what Media Matters was, but you

01:03:56.840 probably heard of Business Insider. So now it's sounding credible, because you don't know that

01:04:01.660 Business Insider long ago turned into a cesspool and just a Democrat organ. But now Forbes gets in

01:04:11.480 and you say to yourself, Forbes, isn't that like a Republican thing? Oh my God, even the Republicans

01:04:15.880 would say it. But you don't know that Forbes is no longer any kind of a credible entity. I guess it

01:04:22.180 used to be. But at the moment, it's just a Democrat organ. But you probably didn't know that. How many

01:04:28.120 of you knew that? I found out when they went after me. When Forbes started hammering on me, I thought,

01:04:34.140 what's going on here? Steve Forbes literally would contact me every Christmas for several years

01:04:40.140 to ask me to autograph my books for members of his family. Steve Forbes. He owned Forbes.

01:04:48.900 And I couldn't understand why Forbes was going after me. And I complained to him once.

01:04:53.000 And I don't remember what he said. But I didn't realize the business had been sold.

01:04:58.220 So I think that's what's going on. I think the business was sold. I need a fact check on that.

01:05:03.340 But I think it was. So if you didn't know that, you'd think, oh my God, even Republicans

01:05:10.020 have this opinion about this. And then by the time it gets to the Washington Post,

01:05:15.820 even Democrats don't know the Washington Post is not real journalism. And they think that the

01:05:22.420 New York Times is real as well. So do you see how they laundered it? Let me give you the list again.

01:05:28.340 And it is from the least credible up to what Democrats think is credible, but Republicans know

01:05:34.360 better. Least credible media matters. Next ADL. Next Business Insider. Next Forbes. Washington Post.

01:05:46.440 New York Times. So they got this bullshit from one hashtag all the way up to the New York Times.

01:05:53.200 Now that's good. Now, if you didn't know that this is a well-organized, understood op and that it won't

01:06:05.460 be the first time or the last time you see this play, it's completely different once you see the

01:06:10.760 gears of the machine, isn't it? And I think that's what's different about 2024. In 2024, we're calling

01:06:17.420 all their plays before they happen because now we see the gears of the machine.

01:06:21.500 You know, smart people, you know, the Glenn Greenwalds and et cetera, and Kanakoa have been

01:06:28.780 helping us understand how this big Democrat machine works. And once you see all the gears of the machine,

01:06:37.780 you can predict what it does next, right? And we're doing it. People are predicting what's next.

01:06:43.760 We all expect that there'll be big protests, at least in the summer. And certainly if Trump gets elected,

01:06:51.540 there'll be protests after. But we all know they're not real. When BLM was happening, it kind of looked real

01:06:58.140 to me. And when Antifa was happening, I was thinking, they don't look totally real, but maybe a lot of them

01:07:05.200 are. But if it happened today, we wouldn't, we would know that none of it's real. And there might

01:07:10.500 be like some new organization that the new, the new, you know, Wall Street, whatever that group was,

01:07:18.000 or, you know, it's going to be some new fake organization popping up if they need one.

01:07:23.300 So we do all the plays. So, and that's why I tell you, if you're not following Kanakoa the Great,

01:07:29.720 what you need to do if you want this world to be a better place is follow him because of this,

01:07:36.460 because of this. You want to boost this signal. Every time they come after one of us,

01:07:42.860 your best reaction, your, let's say your bodily defense system, you know, your white blood cells,

01:07:48.860 if you're looking to defend the organism against attack, you need to concentrate your fire and

01:07:56.700 make sure you're boosting the message of the good ones. And Kanakoa the Great is absolutely,

01:08:03.880 that the content is sensational. But you need to follow them just because they're coming after

01:08:08.980 him. That'd be good enough by itself. All right. Well, so basically, Israel, 0.93

01:08:19.540 so the International Court of Justice ruled 15 to 2 on the question, I guess, South Africa brought to

01:08:26.360 the International Court of Justice, the question of Gaza, and whether or not it was a genocide being

01:08:32.780 committed by Israel. Now, this is one of those stories, I think the initial reporting was basically

01:08:41.100 all wrong. And we're just getting a clearer image of it now. So, so it looks like the court basically

01:08:51.260 is asking Israel to maintain records and demonstrate in the future that they're not committing a genocide.

01:08:59.100 Now, that's not terrible. But it still puts Israel in the position of they have to defend against being 0.85

01:09:08.020 a genocide, which sort of is the assumption you're a genocide unless you prove otherwise, you know,

01:09:14.060 the opposite of innocent until proven guilty. But it's a government. So, you know, governments have to be

01:09:19.620 transparent. Now, do you think it's in any way possible for Israel to keep all the information 0.75

01:09:27.820 that would get to the point of whether somebody else thinks that it was a genocide? Because that's

01:09:34.020 sort of subjective, isn't it? They would have to guess what somebody else would think they should be

01:09:39.000 keeping. I don't know how you could possibly do that. So, it seems like a setup that there's no way

01:09:45.320 they can accomplish what the court is asking, which is make sure you're transparent so we can decide

01:09:50.980 later if you were a genocide or not. I don't think anybody could do that, even if they wanted to,

01:09:57.600 because you don't know exactly what information in the future you should be protecting or what

01:10:02.860 they'd ask for. And if they ask for more than you legitimately thought was worth protecting,

01:10:08.520 what are you going to do? Are you then guilty of a genocide because you didn't know what records

01:10:12.660 to keep or something like that? I don't know. So, the whole thing's illegitimate. I don't think

01:10:17.860 there's no real impact on Israel at the moment. But Netanyahu, of course, blasted them for even

01:10:26.620 entertaining the thought that self-defense was genocide. Now, here's how I see it, and probably 0.94

01:10:34.120 many of you do as well. Let's say your neighbor had 15 children, and you went over there one day with

01:10:41.740 a machine gun, and you shot everybody in his family. Sort of a mass murder genocide in that

01:10:47.720 case. Wouldn't you agree? I would. I'd call that a mass murder, you know, sort of in the family of a

01:10:56.440 genocide, but smaller. Yeah. So, at least a mass murder. Now, suppose instead that neighbor was

01:11:05.240 training all of his own children to wear suicide vests, and one at a time, they were coming to your

01:11:11.240 house to try to kill you. But maybe you got lucky, and you weren't there once, and, you know, it blew

01:11:17.300 up the living room, but you got it fixed, and the next time the next kid came up, you know, you had a

01:11:23.580 gun, so you shot him in the sidewalk, and he detonated in the sidewalk. All right. Now, you're still living

01:11:28.740 next to your neighbor. He's got 13 kids left, and he's told you directly, I'm training them all to kill

01:11:35.100 you. So, instead of waiting for them to come one by one from next door to kill you, you say, I'm going

01:11:42.400 to take my machine gun, and I'm just going to kill everybody there. I'd call that self-defense. What

01:11:47.320 would you call it? What would you call it? I'd call it self-defense. I would say murdering his 13

01:11:54.440 children who had committed no crimes under that specific situation, 100% self-defense. And with no

01:12:02.200 ambiguity, to me, that's not even a gray area. Now, I don't think analogies should be used. Yeah, right.

01:12:10.740 I don't think analogies should be used in place of reason. So, you shouldn't use the analogy to decide

01:12:17.820 what Israel, you know, should do or can do or did, right? So, don't take the analogy and say, oh, let's

01:12:23.300 just apply it to Israel, and we're done thinking. Instead, use the analogy in the correct way, which is to

01:12:30.080 sort of open your mind to a frame for understanding Israel. So, now let's just look at Israel. If Israel 0.69

01:12:38.220 doesn't kill basically everybody who has sworn to kill them and has tried, then they have not executed

01:12:46.240 self-defense very well. In my opinion, they have a right to kill everybody who ever said we want to kill

01:12:51.940 Israelis because they have clearly shown that it's not just talk. They're operationalizing it. They're training

01:12:59.900 the kids. They're brainwashing them. They're literally training them to go kill Israelis. Under those 1.00

01:13:05.960 conditions, you can kill all of their children. I mean, the pushback would be insane, and I don't

01:13:14.960 think that's going to happen. I don't think Israel is going to kill all their children. But they do have 1.00

01:13:20.180 an ethical and moral right to do that. It's just so impractical, it can't possibly happen. But in my

01:13:27.260 opinion, Israel is operating under complete self-defense. I'm 100% supportive of everything

01:13:34.360 they do. It is war, and don't be silly. There will be war crimes. Maybe not prosecuted, just like every

01:13:42.560 other war. There will be terrible atrocities that won't be prosecuted, like every war. So, the question

01:13:49.580 is, do you do war or not? In this case, it was obvious they had to. So, do I care that the

01:13:56.680 Palestinians have weaponized their kids to the point where Israel would be wise to slay them? 1.00

01:14:03.680 It's a tragedy. It's also nothing else you can do about it. Yeah, nothing else you can do about it.

01:14:13.940 So, I don't think there's any chance that Gaza will be ever run by Hamas or even the Palestinians

01:14:20.440 without Israel's thumb on everything. And that's the only way it's going to go. 0.92

01:14:25.640 Meanwhile, the Houthis have fired another anti-ship ballistic missile, this time towards

01:14:30.360 the USS Kearney. What? What? I thought they were just shooting at transportation and tanker

01:14:40.800 ships. They just fired a ballistic missile at one of our warships. Now, we shot it down. So, the ship

01:14:51.440 had anti-ballistic missiles, and luckily it worked. But now that the Kearney is a destroyer, so that's a

01:15:00.620 pretty serious ship. Well, what are we supposed to do? Yeah, it's easy to say war, but that's what

01:15:10.340 they're asking for, aren't they? Aren't the Houthis trying to lure us into war? Because they're not

01:15:18.140 just trying to stop shipping. I think they're trying to lure us into war. Wouldn't it make more

01:15:24.140 sense to take out the leadership of Iran than the Houthis? And I feel like Trump would put that on the

01:15:35.460 table. And I think it needs to be on the table at this point. I think somebody says, you know,

01:15:41.220 the last thing we want is a war with Iran, but we'll take out your leadership if you keep this up.

01:15:47.180 And then do it. And then do it. Because I don't think we could have a greater risk than we have

01:15:52.880 now, because Iran is clearly willing to do lots of dangerous things to destroy everything in the 0.94

01:15:59.000 Middle East, including us and Israel. And under those conditions, you know, the last thing I want

01:16:06.040 is a war with Iran. A war with Iran would have blowback in the homeland. Shit would start blowing

01:16:11.740 up in America really fast. Yeah, you wouldn't be able to travel in the inner cities for a while.

01:16:18.200 Yeah, we would, America would close down for a few months if Iran got taken out. 0.99

01:16:25.280 Because their terrorist cells, I'm sure, are here already. I'm sure they're here and ready to

01:16:32.500 activate without any orders. They would just see that it's time to activate. So I don't think I

01:16:41.420 want a war with any part of Iran's military, but dropping a mother of all bums wherever the great 1.00

01:16:47.340 leader is and just saying, we warned you. But at the very least, we should warn them that that's what

01:16:54.780 we planned to do. Because I don't have a better plan. What's a better plan than taking out the

01:17:00.340 ayatollahs? Do you have a better plan? I don't know. I don't think there's an economic way, because 1.00

01:17:09.080 the countries that get any kind of economic sanctions, they just find ways around it.

01:17:15.440 Take out the oil. Oh, there you go. Take out their entire oil industry. Yeah, that's the way to go.

01:17:24.740 That's better. That's better. Yeah, we could actually, here's what I'd do. I would make a target list

01:17:33.780 of Iranian assets and match them one-to-one with Houthi missiles or even the attacks on our proxies

01:17:42.220 and attack on our troops in the Middle East where they're stationed. And I would say that the next

01:17:48.740 missile is going to cost you this facility. The one after it is going to cost you this facility.

01:17:55.380 And actually just give them a menu and say, here's your menu. These are the things that are going to

01:18:01.000 disappear in Iran and on this schedule. And every time you send a Houthi missile at us,

01:18:08.740 we're going to go down the menu to item number two, and it's just going to fucking disappear. 0.96

01:18:19.820 All right. One head at a time. This assumes they don't already have the bomb.

01:18:29.120 Hmm. Yeah. It does assume that. But it also assumes that no matter what they're going to do with the bomb,

01:18:38.920 Israel is going to destroy them once it's operational because they have to. 0.95

01:18:44.720 say a government that will not adhere to the Supreme Court will be left. Okay.

01:18:58.620 Well, Trump was trying to bankrupt them, but it wasn't working

01:19:01.420 because their facilities were still making and shipping oil. Now, I assume that if we were to do

01:19:08.860 something like that, take out their oil facilities, that their terrorists would take out our oil 0.97

01:19:13.780 facilities and they would attack Israel directly and all that stuff. Plutonium Enrichment Project. 0.54

01:19:22.140 Yeah. That seems like that would be fruitful.

01:19:26.560 All right. So,

01:19:29.520 that's all I've got for today. Thanks for joining on the

01:19:33.100 YouTube and Rumble and X platforms, and I will see you tomorrow for more fun.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 26, 2024

Episode 2365 CWSA 01⧸26⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript