Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 01, 2024


Episode 2371 CWSA 02⧸01⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 3 minutes

Words per Minute

142.89288

Word Count

9,138

Sentence Count

558

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

33


Summary

In honor of Black History Month, the Denny's in Oakland, CA has shuttered all of their food service outlets, and Dr. Drew is here to talk about it. Also, California is trying to make it illegal to do crime, and there's no such thing as a woke boy.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Bom-bom-bom-bom, ra-pa-pa-pa, la-pa-pa.
00:00:06.140 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:10.720 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:12.580 Would you like to take this up to a level that nobody can even understand?
00:00:16.940 Well, to do that, all you need is a cuppa, a mug, or a glass, a tank, or a chalice, a
00:00:21.360 stye, and a canteen jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:24.400 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:26.240 I like coffee.
00:00:26.920 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing
00:00:33.040 that makes everything better.
00:00:34.460 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it's happening now.
00:00:38.120 Go.
00:00:42.660 Oh, extra good.
00:00:46.820 One of the best.
00:00:49.020 Well, happy Black History Month.
00:00:51.080 I hope you're enjoying your coffee, Black, in honor of the month.
00:00:56.920 Let's see how Oakland is celebrating Black History Month.
00:01:00.780 They're shuttering the only Denny's in Oakland.
00:01:05.160 Okay, that's probably a coincidence, but there's no more Denny's in Oakland.
00:01:10.840 Now, the thing I'm most worried about is that this is not the first food-related place that
00:01:16.220 was closed in Oakland.
00:01:17.280 And I live a short drive from Oakland.
00:01:24.240 So what happens when all of their food sources are closed because of crime?
00:01:31.240 And I'm just a few minutes away by car, stolen car, and I'm completely made of meat.
00:01:39.280 I don't like where this is heading.
00:01:43.320 I do predict massive cannibalism in the areas surrounding Oakland within the next six months.
00:01:51.860 So better fight for your life.
00:01:55.940 Well, California is having a ballot initiative.
00:02:00.100 A ballot initiative is what we do because our government doesn't work.
00:02:03.460 So sometimes the voters will say, well, how about the government?
00:02:07.660 We'll just do it ourselves and we'll make our own law.
00:02:11.180 It's called a budget.
00:02:12.500 No, it's called a ballot initiative.
00:02:16.620 And so California is doing a ballot initiative to make it illegal to do crime.
00:02:21.320 Okay, I might be paraphrasing it a little bit too much, but they want to strengthen the penalties
00:02:28.480 for serial theft and fentanyl-related crimes.
00:02:32.600 Yeah, you know, the very things that are destroying the city.
00:02:36.660 Well, all the cities.
00:02:38.620 And so the California citizens want to have a little more penalty for crime.
00:02:45.600 So it's possible that I will be able to survive living in California.
00:02:51.520 I'll tell you, it was tough yesterday.
00:02:54.280 So yesterday, the news said there was going to be this big Pineapple Express, you know, storm of storms.
00:03:02.260 And so I'm not going to show this to you closely, but it turns out that there was a force field around my town
00:03:10.300 that prevented any heavy rain or weather.
00:03:15.240 For some reason, you know, the entire, you know, county after county was just, you know, deluged.
00:03:21.600 But there's this little island right there where I am.
00:03:25.380 Eh, it's sprinkled a little bit.
00:03:27.220 No big deal.
00:03:28.560 Kind of a disappointment.
00:03:30.380 All right.
00:03:32.660 The New York Post is reporting that there's a Connecticut...
00:03:38.240 No, there's a...
00:03:39.240 Where is it?
00:03:40.300 There was a high school in somewhere in New York that they have state-designated tampon dispensers in the boys' rooms.
00:03:49.980 So in the boys' bathroom, they had a state-mandated tampon dispenser that lasted 20 minutes
00:03:56.340 until one of the boys or more of them ripped it off the wall.
00:04:01.840 They just ripped it off the wall.
00:04:04.120 Now, does anybody have sons?
00:04:06.760 Do any of you have young sons?
00:04:08.820 You know, let's say under 18?
00:04:12.360 There's no such thing as a young boy who's woke, is there?
00:04:16.600 There's basically...
00:04:17.720 I suppose if you're LGBTQ, maybe.
00:04:19.980 But I don't think there are many woke boys.
00:04:24.460 There might be some woke girls.
00:04:27.480 I don't know.
00:04:28.060 But there aren't any woke boys.
00:04:30.560 That's just not even a thing.
00:04:34.320 We'll see if they get tamed later when they need to earn a living and live in the real world.
00:04:41.520 They'll get trained.
00:04:43.780 They'll get trained to obey, unfortunately.
00:04:46.300 Dave Rubin was interviewing Dr. Drew, and Dr. Drew said something that I completely agree with, but it's just shocking to hear it, you know, coming out of anybody else's mouth, but especially a doctor.
00:05:00.480 And he said, quote, I realize that everything in the news is BS, everything.
00:05:05.100 There is nothing I can consume on legacy media that I can trust, and that is shocking.
00:05:11.420 It makes you wonder how long it's been going on.
00:05:14.340 I didn't realize how much speech was being...
00:05:17.100 That's kind of where I'm at.
00:05:20.580 But I do agree that 100% of the news is motivated.
00:05:28.300 It's more like marketing, isn't it?
00:05:31.160 See, if you really think about it, the news is almost entirely marketing, because almost nothing makes it on the news unless somebody has a way to make money from it, directly or indirectly.
00:05:41.840 You know, even if it's just purely political, if your party wins because of that political point, well, then you get to be in power, and maybe you make more money.
00:05:53.260 So pretty much all of the news is some kind of marketing for something else.
00:05:59.840 To imagine that its purpose is to inform you and make you a better citizen, I don't know if it ever was that.
00:06:06.680 I guess that was probably an illusion at some point.
00:06:09.440 Well, my theme for today is that all of our data is bad.
00:06:16.140 Let's see if I can make that theme come true.
00:06:18.840 All of our data and everything in the news is bad.
00:06:24.420 So there's a survey that found that humans prefer AI-generated copy.
00:06:30.820 So I did a survey and found that a bunch of people preferred reading what the computer wrote over what humans wrote.
00:06:39.440 Does that sound like good data and something useful and told you something you should know?
00:06:45.740 Well, here's the part left out.
00:06:48.860 A little bit of context.
00:06:51.300 98% of all people who write, human beings, that is, don't know how to write.
00:06:57.000 There are very few people who actually know how to write.
00:07:01.320 So if the computer does a better job than 98% of humans, that's just starting out.
00:07:15.220 It's beating the other 2% that's the hard part.
00:07:18.960 You know what else?
00:07:20.460 Let's see.
00:07:21.140 I'm 66 years old.
00:07:23.740 I could beat about 90% of all living human beings in basketball.
00:07:32.340 Probably.
00:07:33.520 I'll bet I could beat 98% of all living human beings in basketball.
00:07:39.260 Because they don't play.
00:07:41.580 It's just not their game.
00:07:42.780 If you've never played, you know, I could probably hit a shot better than you.
00:07:49.220 So I'm not too worried about the computer doing better than professional writers yet.
00:07:55.220 It could get there.
00:07:56.600 But I don't think the current technology can do it.
00:08:00.380 All right.
00:08:01.260 Let's talk about Fonnie Willis.
00:08:04.760 So Fonnie is the one.
00:08:06.940 I'm getting all the bad behaviors mixed up.
00:08:09.340 She's only one of the people in the news, but it's not complete.
00:08:15.220 She's just one of the people who took money from some source and gave it to her boyfriend.
00:08:22.400 Because there's at least two or three of those stories going on right now.
00:08:26.920 Because everything's broken and corrupt.
00:08:29.520 All right.
00:08:29.780 Yeah.
00:08:29.940 So Cori Bush and Fonnie are both having some issues about some money that they gave to her boyfriends.
00:08:38.200 One from a campaign and one from public money.
00:08:40.880 Fonnie's from the public money.
00:08:42.920 Taking it from the campaign, that's a different situation, I would say.
00:08:48.380 Anyway.
00:08:48.900 Now the Free Beacon has some audio of a whistleblower who is complaining to Fonnie Willis about her top aide misusing federal funds.
00:09:00.760 And so what did Fonnie do when the whistleblower said that her top aide was misusing federal funds?
00:09:06.920 If you guessed she fired the whistleblower, you're right.
00:09:11.540 She fired the whistleblower.
00:09:13.100 Those of you who subscribe to the Dilbert Reborn comic will find out that Dilbert's CEO has just hired a high-priced consultant that is probably his girlfriend.
00:09:29.440 So if you want to see how fast Dilbert can turn the news into a comic, well, a lot faster than it used to be.
00:09:36.580 Because I don't have any syndication company to get in the middle.
00:09:39.740 So if you subscribe to it either on the X platform or the Locals platform, you already saw it.
00:09:49.220 So what do you think about this story about Fonnie Willis firing a whistleblower and maybe allegedly giving money to her boyfriend to prosecute Trump?
00:10:02.320 Well, you know what I say about that?
00:10:04.440 It all sounds a little Fonnie to me.
00:10:07.020 Fonnie.
00:10:07.980 I told you all the news is Fonnie.
00:10:10.480 This is the funniest story I've ever had in a while.
00:10:13.560 It's very funny.
00:10:15.860 All right.
00:10:16.660 Moving on.
00:10:18.560 Have you seen some stories that suggest that dementia can be transmitted to another person?
00:10:25.060 Alzheimer, I think, and dementia.
00:10:27.520 Has anybody seen that science?
00:10:30.040 I'm not sure I believe it yet because I don't believe anything that's in the news.
00:10:34.080 But there is some suggestion that you can, in some special cases, dementia can be transmitted.
00:10:42.020 I don't know how that's possible, but maybe.
00:10:44.720 And then, of course, you've heard the old thing about you are the average of the five people you spend time with.
00:10:52.600 Have you heard of that?
00:10:53.480 I forget who said it first.
00:10:55.140 You are the average of your five closest friends or something.
00:10:59.060 And I was thinking, maybe we have a reason to understand why Corrine Jean-Pierre can't speak.
00:11:10.640 Because the people she spends the most time with would be President Biden and Vice President Harris.
00:11:18.380 And I'm telling you, if dementia can be caught, she's probably got a good dose of it.
00:11:24.500 Because here's what she said today, and I quote Corrine Jean-Pierre.
00:11:30.340 Look, what we want to make sure and what FAA wants to make sure,
00:11:38.020 and it is their priority that we make the safety, obviously,
00:11:44.440 the safety of Americans as they fly across the country, obviously, and beyond, is safe.
00:11:51.240 End quote.
00:11:57.560 You know, but what I think is that, sure, Americans might be able to fly safely,
00:12:05.120 but are they unburdened by what has gone before?
00:12:09.280 And is there a Venn diagram that could explain this better?
00:12:13.300 Yeah, I just feel sorry for Corrine.
00:12:16.380 She has to be around people who are going to give her dementia.
00:12:18.360 Well, here's some more fake news.
00:12:22.980 The Hill is reporting a new survey that if former President Trump is convicted on any of the serious counts,
00:12:32.740 not counting the, what do you call it, the civil suit, that's different.
00:12:38.660 But if he gets convicted on any of the criminal ones that are brewing,
00:12:44.380 according to the Hill, his popularity or his poll results will plunge compared to Biden.
00:12:53.380 So does that sound like a legitimate survey?
00:12:58.580 So they found out that if he's convicted, people would be less likely to vote for him.
00:13:05.320 Does that sound like something that they can determine with a poll?
00:13:10.540 Okay.
00:13:11.680 Let me tell you how to rig a poll.
00:13:14.020 Now, I'm not saying this poll is rigged.
00:13:17.000 I'm going to tell you how it's done,
00:13:18.960 and then you can look for it in this poll and any others.
00:13:22.600 This is how it's done.
00:13:24.000 It's how you ask the question.
00:13:25.340 Consider these two questions to get to the point, to get to the same place.
00:13:31.100 You're trying to find out what will happen if Trump is convicted of a crime,
00:13:35.040 and then how will people vote?
00:13:37.260 Two ways to ask the question.
00:13:39.240 Number one, would you vote for a criminal for president?
00:13:45.280 Would you vote for a convicted criminal?
00:13:48.880 Do you know what's wrong with that question?
00:13:50.520 The question makes somebody make a statement about who they are.
00:13:55.440 It's really a question about the voter.
00:13:57.960 Are you a person who would support a criminal?
00:14:00.640 No.
00:14:03.180 If a live person is asking me, like a real living person,
00:14:06.940 would you vote for a criminal for president?
00:14:10.080 No.
00:14:11.040 Are you crazy?
00:14:12.460 Who's going to vote for a criminal for president?
00:14:14.500 Now, here's another way to ask the same question.
00:14:19.940 Suppose you said,
00:14:21.920 do you prefer Biden or Trump for president
00:14:25.380 if Trump had been guilty of one rigged conviction
00:14:32.940 in our weaponized justice system?
00:14:35.620 Do you prefer Biden or Trump if Trump is convicted
00:14:40.140 by the weaponized justice system
00:14:43.360 that Biden is using to keep Trump out of office?
00:14:47.400 Do you think you get the same answer
00:14:48.940 as would you support a criminal for president?
00:14:52.740 Now, I don't think that the survey they're mentioning
00:14:55.220 asks the question either of those ways.
00:14:58.760 But they're both valid.
00:15:01.080 They're both ways to get to that question.
00:15:03.600 So the specific way they ask the question
00:15:06.360 but also the specific time they asked it
00:15:09.320 is going to get you whatever answer you want
00:15:11.040 based on how you word it.
00:15:14.040 But the other thing that Democrats consistently get wrong,
00:15:18.020 and a lot of other people too,
00:15:19.700 is they conflate the present with the past and the future.
00:15:25.660 In the present, if you're just thinking about Trump alone,
00:15:30.100 do you like him better if he's not convicted or convicted?
00:15:34.460 People will say, well, you know, given the choice,
00:15:37.100 I'd rather a not convicted person.
00:15:39.420 But if you said, all right, the conviction's over,
00:15:43.300 he's not in jail, but the conviction's over,
00:15:46.100 and now it's down to Biden versus Trump,
00:15:48.400 and you have to vote.
00:15:50.120 Well, now it's a different question, isn't it?
00:15:52.420 It's not about are you an awesome person
00:15:54.980 who would never vote for a criminal,
00:15:56.880 or are you going to let Biden have four more years of this,
00:16:00.540 open borders and God knows what?
00:16:02.460 So once it gets down to, all right,
00:16:05.080 are you really going to vote for Biden?
00:16:06.900 A lot of people who cared about criminal conviction
00:16:10.220 are going to say, you know what?
00:16:11.960 It was probably just a weaponized justice system.
00:16:14.120 I'll ignore that.
00:16:16.400 All right, there's more,
00:16:18.400 there's information that coffee helps you lose weight.
00:16:22.600 Now, if there's one thing I can teach you
00:16:26.860 about interpreting science,
00:16:28.940 and this is important,
00:16:30.300 so if you don't listen to this tip,
00:16:33.340 you will be poorly served in the future.
00:16:36.060 If you see a scientific study
00:16:37.940 that agrees with what you would like it to be,
00:16:41.840 that's called valid science.
00:16:45.480 Valid science.
00:16:46.840 Proof, really.
00:16:48.140 I'd call it a fact.
00:16:49.940 So when there's a study from people I don't know
00:16:52.240 who use a system I don't know
00:16:53.680 for a process I don't know,
00:16:55.380 in a study that probably has no more than a 50% chance
00:16:58.340 of being reproduced,
00:16:59.580 when they tell me that coffee helps me lose weight
00:17:01.660 and it's good for me,
00:17:02.480 I say, that's science.
00:17:05.440 Ladies and gentlemen,
00:17:06.560 that's what I call quality science.
00:17:08.440 Right there.
00:17:11.240 Let's talk about Zuckerberg
00:17:12.440 and some of the other social media people,
00:17:15.360 they had to appear in Congress
00:17:16.640 to defend the horrible things
00:17:19.080 that their platforms are doing to children,
00:17:21.540 which they are.
00:17:24.300 And Josh Hawley
00:17:26.240 tried to embarrass Mark Zuckerberg
00:17:28.980 by asking him to get up
00:17:30.140 and apologize to the family members
00:17:33.080 of people whose children
00:17:35.320 apparently had been victimized
00:17:37.520 because of Facebook or Meta
00:17:39.940 or Instagram.
00:17:42.120 And he did.
00:17:44.700 To his credit,
00:17:47.080 Zuckerberg immediately stood up
00:17:49.120 with no objection,
00:17:51.060 faced the family members
00:17:53.540 of the tragic children who were lost
00:17:56.360 and said that he was sorry
00:18:00.120 for their losses.
00:18:01.560 Now,
00:18:03.820 first of all,
00:18:05.080 it was, yeah,
00:18:05.860 it was purely for theater.
00:18:08.460 Didn't make any difference.
00:18:10.020 I thought it was a messed up thing to do,
00:18:12.260 honestly.
00:18:13.060 I did not appreciate
00:18:15.160 Josh Hawley's showboating.
00:18:18.720 You know,
00:18:19.000 I like Josh Hawley
00:18:20.340 on a lot of things.
00:18:21.720 He's a pretty solid politician.
00:18:24.720 But,
00:18:25.580 that wasn't necessary.
00:18:28.560 That's,
00:18:29.220 you know,
00:18:29.460 I want to be on Josh Hawley's side
00:18:31.320 because I think there's a real danger
00:18:33.840 on the platforms.
00:18:35.020 So,
00:18:35.300 I agree with him on policy.
00:18:36.980 But,
00:18:37.380 don't do that to a citizen.
00:18:39.920 Don't do that to an American citizen.
00:18:42.580 He's,
00:18:43.120 he's not an elected official.
00:18:45.700 How about treating him
00:18:46.480 with a little bit more respect than that?
00:18:49.240 You know,
00:18:49.680 even if you disagree deeply,
00:18:51.940 I just don't think that was
00:18:53.140 respectful.
00:18:54.720 I think that was below the,
00:18:56.400 below the,
00:18:57.480 below the office,
00:19:00.440 frankly.
00:19:01.260 It was below the institution
00:19:02.900 and the office.
00:19:04.200 But,
00:19:04.740 I would note that
00:19:05.720 Zuckerberg handled it cleverly
00:19:07.940 by not really offering an apology
00:19:10.240 at the same time that
00:19:12.160 people imagined it was an apology,
00:19:14.480 so they heard it as an apology.
00:19:16.760 So,
00:19:17.040 it was sort of one of those
00:19:17.820 green needle,
00:19:20.340 damn it,
00:19:21.160 what's that audio illusion?
00:19:23.460 Green needle,
00:19:24.440 you can hear two different things
00:19:25.780 with the same audio.
00:19:27.600 Brainstorming green needle.
00:19:28.620 So,
00:19:30.560 it was one of those.
00:19:31.760 Because if you watched it live,
00:19:33.340 you said to yourself,
00:19:34.220 hey,
00:19:34.440 there he is apologizing.
00:19:36.020 And then you listen to his words,
00:19:37.960 and then the,
00:19:38.700 the people talking about it said,
00:19:40.500 well,
00:19:40.640 there he is apologizing.
00:19:42.260 And so,
00:19:42.880 your brain said,
00:19:43.600 there he is,
00:19:44.180 he's apologizing.
00:19:45.120 Because they just said he's apologizing,
00:19:47.100 and there's words coming out of his mouth,
00:19:48.680 so it sounds like apologizing to me.
00:19:50.700 But he didn't.
00:19:52.700 I'm not saying he should,
00:19:54.540 or shouldn't.
00:19:55.400 I'm just saying that he said
00:19:57.160 he was sorry for their loss.
00:19:58.840 Now,
00:19:59.060 here's how,
00:19:59.660 how you know it's not an apology.
00:20:02.020 You could replace him with me,
00:20:05.300 just randomly,
00:20:06.340 just pick a person out of the crowd,
00:20:08.360 and say,
00:20:08.800 Zuckerberg,
00:20:09.340 could you,
00:20:10.340 just step aside for a minute.
00:20:12.100 We'd like to randomly replace you
00:20:14.100 with another citizen.
00:20:15.800 Scott,
00:20:16.640 okay,
00:20:17.280 come over here.
00:20:18.380 Now,
00:20:18.700 face,
00:20:19.160 face the parents
00:20:20.340 who've lost their children.
00:20:21.680 Is there anything you'd like to say?
00:20:23.560 And I would say,
00:20:25.100 well,
00:20:26.240 I wasn't expecting this,
00:20:27.480 but,
00:20:28.400 you know,
00:20:28.600 now that I'm here,
00:20:29.980 I would like to say that
00:20:31.260 I'm genuinely sorry
00:20:32.420 for all of your losses.
00:20:34.440 And I would be quite serious about that.
00:20:37.560 So,
00:20:38.120 it's not really an apology
00:20:39.540 if everybody in the world
00:20:41.500 could have said the same thing,
00:20:42.720 and it would have sounded the same.
00:20:45.560 It's not exactly
00:20:46.500 taking responsibility,
00:20:47.560 which is sort of key to
00:20:49.600 an apology.
00:20:50.280 An apology without taking responsibility
00:20:53.000 is a nothing.
00:20:54.600 Nobody asks him if he feels bad
00:20:56.200 that,
00:20:57.100 you know,
00:20:57.500 there are victims.
00:20:58.680 I'm sure he does.
00:20:59.920 He's not a monster.
00:21:01.520 It's a husband apology.
00:21:04.560 So,
00:21:05.620 a few other people
00:21:06.460 called that out.
00:21:08.120 Apparently,
00:21:09.000 according to
00:21:09.760 Linda Iaccarino,
00:21:11.340 CEO of X,
00:21:13.120 last year,
00:21:14.580 X suspended
00:21:15.260 over 12 million accounts
00:21:17.040 for violating,
00:21:17.840 I think it's something
00:21:19.520 about children policy.
00:21:21.800 And,
00:21:22.240 it's up from
00:21:22.980 2.3 million
00:21:23.980 that were removed
00:21:26.060 in 2022.
00:21:27.500 So,
00:21:28.020 they've just vastly
00:21:29.580 increased the amount
00:21:31.020 they're removing.
00:21:32.100 Now,
00:21:32.600 I don't know how much
00:21:33.320 gets through.
00:21:35.180 I mean,
00:21:35.520 if you remove
00:21:36.100 98% of it,
00:21:37.920 is that even going
00:21:38.680 to make a difference?
00:21:39.940 Or is the 2%
00:21:40.900 going to be so much
00:21:42.100 that it's like
00:21:43.280 nothing happened?
00:21:44.260 I don't know.
00:21:45.760 Don't know.
00:21:46.440 But I'll tell you,
00:21:49.460 we don't know
00:21:50.000 exactly what's going
00:21:50.880 on online
00:21:51.520 except it's bad
00:21:52.260 for kids.
00:21:53.680 Now,
00:21:54.100 you may say to yourself,
00:21:55.600 Scott,
00:21:56.460 what did this hearing
00:21:58.260 accomplish?
00:21:59.020 Because we have
00:21:59.480 this serious problem
00:22:00.380 that is ruining
00:22:01.520 the lives
00:22:02.160 and literally killing,
00:22:03.240 in some cases,
00:22:04.360 children
00:22:04.800 at an alarming rate.
00:22:07.200 So,
00:22:07.520 did anything get done?
00:22:08.380 Of course.
00:22:09.800 Of course.
00:22:10.680 That's why we have
00:22:11.340 a government
00:22:11.820 to get stuff done.
00:22:13.760 So,
00:22:14.440 among the things
00:22:15.260 that they got done
00:22:16.080 were we humiliated
00:22:18.180 a citizen
00:22:19.240 into a fake apology.
00:22:21.580 That wasn't going
00:22:22.420 to happen on its own.
00:22:24.480 Then there was a hearing.
00:22:26.100 There was a hearing.
00:22:27.700 That's not nothing.
00:22:29.380 And then the hearing,
00:22:30.460 with any luck,
00:22:31.280 might produce a report.
00:22:34.000 And then the report
00:22:35.160 might be used
00:22:36.480 to craft some legislation
00:22:37.900 that has a poison pill in it.
00:22:39.980 You know,
00:22:40.240 poison pill is something
00:22:41.500 you include
00:22:42.100 so that nobody
00:22:42.680 can vote for it.
00:22:43.520 And then there maybe
00:22:45.060 won't be a vote
00:22:45.900 because somebody
00:22:47.240 will hold it up
00:22:47.900 for procedural reasons.
00:22:49.580 But if there is a vote,
00:22:50.740 it won't be approved
00:22:51.500 because of the poison pill.
00:22:53.180 And then when it's not approved,
00:22:54.700 it will become
00:22:55.080 a campaign issue
00:22:56.020 for one of the sides.
00:22:58.700 So,
00:22:59.200 you're thinking
00:22:59.640 that nothing happened.
00:23:00.580 It's like,
00:23:00.900 oh,
00:23:01.520 I don't think anything's
00:23:02.480 going to happen.
00:23:03.180 That's not true.
00:23:05.020 You've got a fake apology,
00:23:06.500 a humiliated person,
00:23:08.620 you've got a hearing,
00:23:09.520 you've got a report,
00:23:10.340 you probably have
00:23:10.940 some fake legislation
00:23:12.000 with a poison pill,
00:23:13.280 and you might get
00:23:13.900 a campaign issue
00:23:14.640 out of it.
00:23:15.320 So,
00:23:15.540 that's not like nothing.
00:23:17.580 Come on.
00:23:18.820 Stop treating it
00:23:19.740 all cynically
00:23:20.340 like absolutely fucking
00:23:22.280 nothing happened
00:23:22.920 because nobody really cares
00:23:24.060 about your dead kids.
00:23:25.420 Because you know what?
00:23:26.460 The government doesn't care
00:23:27.720 about your dead kids.
00:23:29.780 I learned that
00:23:30.620 the hard way
00:23:31.160 because fentanyl
00:23:32.380 is still coming in,
00:23:33.360 folks.
00:23:34.020 Steve Malloy,
00:23:38.960 who writes and posts
00:23:41.240 a lot about climate change,
00:23:42.960 he's a skeptic
00:23:44.020 of the alarmist view
00:23:45.920 of climate,
00:23:47.320 but he says
00:23:48.160 that the,
00:23:48.640 that the climate hoax is,
00:23:53.220 or the,
00:23:53.760 yeah,
00:23:53.980 he calls it
00:23:54.300 the climate hoax,
00:23:55.280 the hockey stick claim
00:23:57.920 is being debunked,
00:23:59.460 he says.
00:24:00.420 Now,
00:24:00.740 you might not know
00:24:01.520 that climate scientists
00:24:03.940 Michael Mann,
00:24:05.040 I think I have this right,
00:24:06.360 but fact check me on this,
00:24:07.920 is in a lawsuit
00:24:09.460 against Mark Stein.
00:24:12.260 I think it's happening
00:24:13.160 in Canada,
00:24:13.820 and the issue is
00:24:15.940 that Mark Stein,
00:24:17.600 you know,
00:24:17.900 may have said
00:24:19.680 some things
00:24:20.260 about Michael Mann's
00:24:21.280 sciencing
00:24:22.000 that Michael Mann
00:24:23.640 thinks is
00:24:24.780 lawsuit worthy
00:24:25.800 because he would say
00:24:27.820 that his science
00:24:28.660 is good
00:24:29.100 and he's an honest guy
00:24:30.520 and he did good work
00:24:31.680 and that maligning him
00:24:33.280 in public
00:24:33.800 should have consequences.
00:24:36.420 However,
00:24:37.280 in defense of Mark Stein,
00:24:39.620 it looks like
00:24:40.120 a Wharton statistician
00:24:42.260 was brought in,
00:24:42.860 Dr. Abraham Weiner,
00:24:44.440 who testified
00:24:45.360 under oath
00:24:46.240 that the hockey stick
00:24:49.740 is bullshit
00:24:50.260 and that
00:24:52.420 the data
00:24:53.880 is bullshit
00:24:54.720 and the interpretation
00:24:55.880 is bullshit.
00:24:57.900 Now,
00:24:58.800 did it take long
00:25:00.680 for other people
00:25:02.180 to weigh in on this?
00:25:03.080 Well,
00:25:03.380 Dr. Jordan Peterson
00:25:04.400 weighed in
00:25:04.960 very quickly
00:25:06.480 and he talked
00:25:10.600 about how
00:25:11.020 the climate change
00:25:12.120 thing is being debunked.
00:25:14.360 Well,
00:25:14.520 that caused
00:25:15.100 a science student,
00:25:18.400 somebody whose profile
00:25:19.740 says they're a science student,
00:25:21.820 Dan Vandenbroek,
00:25:24.360 and he wrote
00:25:24.900 a lengthy reply
00:25:26.700 to Dr. Jordan Peterson
00:25:28.240 and he says
00:25:29.540 that although,
00:25:31.060 and by the way,
00:25:32.060 as a public figure,
00:25:33.680 if you really want
00:25:34.480 to annoy a public figure,
00:25:36.480 start your criticism
00:25:37.780 this way.
00:25:39.060 We hate it.
00:25:40.860 Well,
00:25:41.200 you know,
00:25:41.980 you do a lot of good things
00:25:43.380 in this other field.
00:25:45.620 Oh my God,
00:25:46.560 I hate that.
00:25:48.620 Oh,
00:25:49.200 do I hate that.
00:25:50.140 Because everything
00:25:50.840 that follows that
00:25:51.680 is going to be
00:25:52.240 fucking stupid.
00:25:53.920 You know it is.
00:25:55.500 So,
00:25:56.000 this guy's going to go
00:25:56.820 after Jordan Peterson
00:25:58.200 for being,
00:25:59.640 you know,
00:25:59.900 an expert
00:26:00.380 in one field
00:26:01.220 of science,
00:26:02.420 but not climate science
00:26:04.600 like he is.
00:26:05.240 So,
00:26:07.300 he's going to point out
00:26:08.280 that,
00:26:08.720 you know,
00:26:09.620 although your insights
00:26:10.840 in psychology
00:26:11.620 have been invaluable
00:26:12.660 to many,
00:26:13.960 blah, blah,
00:26:14.840 but your reliance
00:26:16.000 on figures
00:26:16.540 such as Steve Malloy,
00:26:18.220 and then he'll talk
00:26:18.980 about how Steve Malloy
00:26:20.620 is known for his ties
00:26:21.820 to oil and tobacco industries.
00:26:23.580 I don't know if,
00:26:24.380 I don't know about
00:26:25.040 any of that,
00:26:25.600 if that's true.
00:26:26.880 But I do assume
00:26:27.840 that everybody
00:26:28.380 who's involved
00:26:29.160 has some kind of tie
00:26:30.080 to somebody.
00:26:30.680 I don't think
00:26:32.660 there's anybody
00:26:33.160 who's really
00:26:33.760 completely untied
00:26:36.040 to anybody
00:26:36.580 who has any
00:26:37.120 political or financial
00:26:38.200 interest.
00:26:41.760 And blah,
00:26:42.780 blah, blah.
00:26:43.180 So,
00:26:43.440 he maligns
00:26:44.540 Steve Malloy
00:26:45.500 with,
00:26:46.060 you know,
00:26:46.300 generic stuff,
00:26:47.500 nothing specific.
00:26:49.220 And then,
00:26:50.760 let's see,
00:26:53.080 then he says
00:26:53.580 you have a lack
00:26:54.060 of nuance
00:26:54.520 on these topics,
00:26:55.520 and he complains
00:26:57.920 about how
00:26:59.120 Jordan Peterson
00:26:59.720 tweeted that
00:27:00.700 there's global
00:27:02.160 greening because
00:27:03.160 of CO2
00:27:04.020 and that therefore
00:27:05.440 CO2 might be
00:27:06.920 helping the planet
00:27:08.080 more than hurting
00:27:08.840 because greening
00:27:10.140 is increasing.
00:27:11.680 But the science
00:27:12.420 student points out
00:27:13.300 that Jordan Peterson
00:27:15.400 and others
00:27:15.980 are leaving out
00:27:16.880 that although
00:27:17.820 it is greening,
00:27:19.500 that's true,
00:27:20.780 CO2 is going up
00:27:21.980 and the planet
00:27:22.900 is greening,
00:27:23.760 but it's not
00:27:24.260 because of CO2.
00:27:25.860 It's because
00:27:26.540 of better land
00:27:27.220 management.
00:27:29.620 To which I say,
00:27:31.020 but it's still
00:27:32.800 getting greener?
00:27:34.240 Yeah,
00:27:34.780 but not because
00:27:35.400 of CO2,
00:27:36.140 because of better
00:27:36.660 land management.
00:27:38.780 And then I say
00:27:39.740 again,
00:27:40.380 but it's still
00:27:41.860 getting greener.
00:27:43.140 Yeah,
00:27:43.320 yeah,
00:27:43.520 yeah,
00:27:43.760 but not because
00:27:44.500 of the CO2.
00:27:45.780 No,
00:27:46.480 it's because of
00:27:47.000 better land
00:27:47.460 management.
00:27:49.260 And then I say,
00:27:50.400 I accept your
00:27:51.320 frame,
00:27:52.240 and you're saying
00:27:53.400 that those two
00:27:54.300 things together,
00:27:55.040 or maybe even
00:27:55.980 just the land
00:27:56.580 management is
00:27:57.980 making everything
00:27:58.620 greener.
00:28:00.120 Yes,
00:28:00.400 I am,
00:28:00.720 but it's not
00:28:01.060 because of
00:28:01.460 climate change.
00:28:02.100 Okay,
00:28:02.740 do you even
00:28:03.420 hear yourself?
00:28:04.840 Can you even
00:28:05.400 hear what you're
00:28:05.900 saying?
00:28:08.500 Because
00:28:08.980 if there's a
00:28:12.500 problem that's
00:28:13.160 just making us
00:28:13.880 happier,
00:28:14.920 why are we
00:28:15.540 complaining about
00:28:16.260 it?
00:28:16.900 Does it matter
00:28:17.600 why it's getting
00:28:18.380 greener?
00:28:19.980 It doesn't matter
00:28:20.820 why.
00:28:21.240 it just
00:28:22.160 matters that
00:28:23.380 it's not
00:28:23.760 getting
00:28:24.020 un-green.
00:28:25.580 That's what
00:28:26.200 matters.
00:28:27.600 All right.
00:28:29.680 Anyway,
00:28:30.580 here's my
00:28:31.160 take on
00:28:31.560 this.
00:28:32.480 Yes,
00:28:32.980 Dr.
00:28:33.320 Jordan
00:28:33.560 Peterson is
00:28:34.100 not an
00:28:34.420 expert on
00:28:35.080 climate science.
00:28:36.560 However,
00:28:37.560 Dr.
00:28:38.040 Peterson is
00:28:38.800 looking at
00:28:39.440 more science
00:28:40.160 than this
00:28:40.660 guy,
00:28:41.440 because
00:28:41.700 psychology
00:28:42.260 is also
00:28:43.140 a science.
00:28:44.480 Some say
00:28:45.020 you can't
00:28:45.420 reproduce it,
00:28:46.180 but there's
00:28:46.600 still some
00:28:47.020 science there.
00:28:47.560 specifically,
00:28:52.600 the science
00:28:54.100 of mass
00:28:56.020 hysterias,
00:28:57.520 and the
00:28:58.200 science of
00:28:58.720 how people
00:28:59.120 can be
00:28:59.520 influenced,
00:29:00.460 and even
00:29:01.020 more importantly,
00:29:02.300 the science
00:29:02.900 of how
00:29:03.300 economics is
00:29:04.240 basically
00:29:04.700 psychology,
00:29:05.900 with money,
00:29:07.520 right?
00:29:07.760 The study
00:29:08.140 of economics.
00:29:09.600 So this
00:29:10.120 young man
00:29:10.760 can't
00:29:11.680 understand
00:29:12.320 why somebody
00:29:13.820 as smart
00:29:14.220 as Jordan
00:29:14.640 Peterson
00:29:15.080 wouldn't go
00:29:16.360 with the
00:29:16.720 consensus
00:29:17.220 of
00:29:17.580 scientists
00:29:18.120 and
00:29:18.340 climate
00:29:18.620 science,
00:29:19.580 because,
00:29:19.980 I mean,
00:29:20.340 how can
00:29:20.620 all these
00:29:20.940 people be
00:29:21.400 wrong?
00:29:23.120 There's
00:29:23.440 actually
00:29:23.820 still
00:29:24.220 somebody
00:29:24.600 in the
00:29:24.900 world
00:29:25.200 who
00:29:26.100 believes
00:29:26.500 that if
00:29:26.820 all the
00:29:27.120 scientists
00:29:27.540 agree,
00:29:29.000 or 90%
00:29:30.060 or 95%
00:29:30.960 or whatever
00:29:31.360 it is,
00:29:32.060 that therefore
00:29:32.600 you know
00:29:33.100 something.
00:29:34.620 Oh,
00:29:35.080 my goodness.
00:29:36.980 This is
00:29:37.760 probably what
00:29:38.280 Dr.
00:29:38.780 Drew was
00:29:39.400 when he
00:29:39.960 was the
00:29:40.460 age of
00:29:40.840 this young
00:29:41.200 man.
00:29:43.100 Still
00:29:43.680 believing
00:29:44.060 that if
00:29:44.500 the consensus
00:29:45.200 of science
00:29:46.200 was heavily
00:29:47.180 weighted in
00:29:47.820 one direction
00:29:48.440 that told
00:29:49.520 you something
00:29:49.940 useful.
00:29:51.300 We're a
00:29:52.100 long way
00:29:52.640 from that
00:29:53.000 world.
00:29:54.780 And so
00:29:55.220 my take
00:29:55.860 on this
00:29:56.260 is that
00:29:56.840 the
00:29:58.040 climate
00:29:58.540 alarmists
00:29:59.260 are using
00:30:00.700 one less
00:30:01.860 science
00:30:02.520 than I
00:30:02.980 am.
00:30:04.900 Does that
00:30:05.620 make sense?
00:30:06.940 So I'm
00:30:07.760 kind of
00:30:08.520 copying
00:30:08.920 Dawkins.
00:30:15.180 Dawkins
00:30:15.660 says he
00:30:16.140 doesn't
00:30:16.980 believe in
00:30:17.380 God,
00:30:18.280 but really
00:30:19.000 he's a lot
00:30:20.240 like the
00:30:20.600 believers
00:30:20.960 because he
00:30:22.160 disbelieves
00:30:22.720 all of the
00:30:23.380 other gods
00:30:23.940 that they
00:30:24.280 also disbelieve
00:30:25.460 and he's
00:30:26.560 just one
00:30:27.000 God short
00:30:27.620 of being
00:30:28.100 the same
00:30:28.920 opinion.
00:30:30.220 Now he
00:30:30.640 says it
00:30:31.040 like it's
00:30:31.640 funnier.
00:30:32.600 In my
00:30:32.980 case,
00:30:33.240 I'm being
00:30:33.460 more serious.
00:30:34.540 If you
00:30:35.180 looked at
00:30:35.520 the science
00:30:36.020 of climate
00:30:36.540 change and
00:30:37.700 it's the
00:30:37.920 only science
00:30:38.640 you looked
00:30:38.960 at,
00:30:39.680 you'd be
00:30:40.260 missing the
00:30:40.740 picture.
00:30:41.640 Because the
00:30:42.340 science of
00:30:42.900 why you
00:30:43.260 think what
00:30:43.680 you think,
00:30:44.560 psychology,
00:30:45.600 is at least
00:30:46.540 half of the
00:30:47.020 story.
00:30:48.200 So you're
00:30:48.700 one science
00:30:49.420 short if
00:30:50.820 all you did
00:30:51.300 is look at
00:30:51.740 climate science.
00:30:52.940 Now I know
00:30:53.340 climate science
00:30:54.080 includes chemistry
00:30:55.800 and physics,
00:30:57.180 so it's a
00:30:57.660 bunch of
00:30:58.640 science in
00:30:59.100 there.
00:30:59.720 But you're
00:31:00.200 still one
00:31:00.600 science short
00:31:01.260 if you don't
00:31:02.860 understand how
00:31:03.540 all the
00:31:04.220 economic
00:31:05.360 incentives of
00:31:06.460 the entire
00:31:06.860 industry are
00:31:07.440 pointing in
00:31:07.860 the same
00:31:08.140 direction,
00:31:09.160 and therefore
00:31:09.700 the psychology
00:31:10.560 of people
00:31:11.040 involved would
00:31:12.220 be to
00:31:12.840 believe something
00:31:14.600 that the
00:31:15.080 evidence doesn't
00:31:15.880 suggest because
00:31:16.800 cognitive dissonance
00:31:17.980 and or self
00:31:18.700 interest would
00:31:19.660 drive them
00:31:20.160 strongly in
00:31:20.860 that direction.
00:31:23.040 If you don't
00:31:23.920 understand how
00:31:24.560 easily that
00:31:25.260 can happen,
00:31:26.260 i.e.
00:31:26.940 maybe it
00:31:27.400 happened in
00:31:27.860 the pandemic,
00:31:29.900 then you're
00:31:30.780 one science
00:31:31.300 short.
00:31:32.600 So don't
00:31:33.060 tell me I'm
00:31:33.500 anti-science,
00:31:34.340 I'm using
00:31:34.760 more science
00:31:35.600 than you,
00:31:36.060 not less.
00:31:37.380 I'm accepting
00:31:37.980 everything you
00:31:38.800 said about
00:31:39.240 climate change
00:31:40.040 did really
00:31:41.080 come from
00:31:41.540 scientists,
00:31:42.540 and then I'm
00:31:43.220 looking at what
00:31:43.680 the psychologists
00:31:44.380 would say about
00:31:45.420 scientists who
00:31:46.920 are in this
00:31:47.360 situation,
00:31:48.720 and I used
00:31:49.620 both sciences
00:31:50.260 to come to
00:31:50.880 my decision.
00:31:51.980 If you only
00:31:52.740 used one
00:31:53.300 science,
00:31:54.400 you're a
00:31:54.980 science short.
00:31:58.800 Here's another
00:31:59.520 thing I told
00:32:00.160 you.
00:32:00.340 I have
00:32:02.360 experience in
00:32:03.160 something called
00:32:03.640 the real
00:32:04.040 world, where
00:32:05.740 I worked at
00:32:06.280 big companies
00:32:07.040 that acted
00:32:08.380 like big
00:32:08.860 organizations.
00:32:10.480 Now, once
00:32:10.900 you've worked
00:32:11.300 at a few
00:32:11.860 different big
00:32:12.460 companies, you
00:32:13.100 realize there
00:32:13.660 are some
00:32:13.980 things that
00:32:14.400 are just in
00:32:15.640 common, and
00:32:17.020 it has nothing
00:32:17.520 to do with
00:32:18.200 which company.
00:32:19.480 It's just you
00:32:19.960 put a lot of
00:32:20.540 people in one
00:32:21.100 place, no
00:32:22.420 matter what
00:32:22.820 their mission
00:32:23.240 is, and
00:32:24.060 they start
00:32:24.400 acting like a
00:32:25.320 group instead
00:32:25.960 of an
00:32:26.200 individual.
00:32:26.520 So one
00:32:28.420 of the
00:32:28.560 things I
00:32:28.880 told you
00:32:29.220 was, someday
00:32:31.580 you would look
00:32:32.180 back and think
00:32:32.920 it's funny that
00:32:34.560 science ever
00:32:35.240 told you they
00:32:36.600 can measure the
00:32:37.460 temperature of
00:32:38.180 the earth and
00:32:40.300 get an average
00:32:41.100 and compare it
00:32:42.760 to the past
00:32:43.300 years.
00:32:46.260 That's
00:32:46.780 ridiculous.
00:32:48.660 You don't
00:32:49.380 have to know
00:32:49.800 anything about
00:32:50.360 science to
00:32:51.640 know that's
00:32:52.080 not doable.
00:32:53.260 You can't do
00:32:54.120 anything of that
00:32:54.820 scale anywhere
00:32:56.140 in any time.
00:32:58.840 No, it's not
00:32:59.900 possible.
00:33:00.740 Now, I get
00:33:01.360 that years ago
00:33:03.600 in the 60s,
00:33:04.580 they put a
00:33:05.720 rocket ship
00:33:06.880 on the moon,
00:33:08.560 but that's
00:33:09.320 math and
00:33:10.800 physics.
00:33:12.940 That's a
00:33:13.540 whole different
00:33:14.800 constrained set
00:33:15.920 of variables,
00:33:16.660 right?
00:33:17.200 Space is kind
00:33:18.120 of easy compared
00:33:18.980 to weather.
00:33:20.260 I mean, once
00:33:20.620 you get into
00:33:21.000 space, it's
00:33:21.740 basically, what,
00:33:23.800 a vacuum?
00:33:27.220 Well, a
00:33:27.860 vacuum.
00:33:28.820 So that's got
00:33:29.420 to make
00:33:29.680 everything easier,
00:33:30.480 right?
00:33:31.500 So here are
00:33:32.420 some of the
00:33:32.780 things we've
00:33:33.260 learned about
00:33:33.780 how they
00:33:34.160 measure the
00:33:34.680 temperatures
00:33:35.140 from some
00:33:36.800 critics.
00:33:37.600 You've heard
00:33:38.140 about the
00:33:38.560 heat islands
00:33:39.440 where if
00:33:41.180 your thermometer,
00:33:42.820 let's say if
00:33:43.640 you put your
00:33:44.100 thermometer there
00:33:44.860 50 years ago
00:33:45.840 and then since
00:33:47.580 that time a
00:33:48.340 parking lot got
00:33:49.680 put in or
00:33:50.380 it's near a
00:33:51.040 city or an
00:33:51.560 airport or
00:33:52.040 something, the
00:33:53.960 temperature is
00:33:55.020 warmer wherever
00:33:56.180 there's a bunch
00:33:57.660 of concrete.
00:33:59.120 Where there's
00:34:00.060 concrete or
00:34:01.380 metal, it's
00:34:02.720 just going to
00:34:03.100 be warmer.
00:34:03.920 So if the
00:34:04.520 only thing that
00:34:05.080 changed was
00:34:06.280 that there was
00:34:06.780 more construction
00:34:08.000 around where
00:34:08.920 the thermometers
00:34:09.760 already were,
00:34:12.020 then what you
00:34:14.240 would expect is
00:34:14.960 that it would
00:34:15.300 look like there's
00:34:15.960 global warming,
00:34:17.120 but all it was
00:34:18.120 is that the
00:34:19.560 thermometers are
00:34:20.780 in the wrong
00:34:21.160 place.
00:34:22.480 But if you're
00:34:24.180 paying attention
00:34:24.780 to the topic,
00:34:25.520 you know that
00:34:26.160 the people who
00:34:27.160 measure the
00:34:27.600 temperatures, they
00:34:28.620 know that, so
00:34:29.960 they're aware of
00:34:30.360 it.
00:34:30.820 So obviously
00:34:31.600 what they did
00:34:32.420 was they went
00:34:34.600 out and they
00:34:34.960 surveyed all the
00:34:35.540 places that the
00:34:36.240 thermometers were
00:34:37.020 near heat sinks
00:34:38.820 and then they
00:34:40.040 replaced them or
00:34:41.100 moved them.
00:34:42.680 So that makes
00:34:43.120 sense, right?
00:34:44.880 So how good
00:34:46.120 did they do?
00:34:47.040 Well, the
00:34:47.700 critics went out
00:34:48.540 and measured
00:34:49.120 and counted
00:34:50.460 all the places
00:34:51.360 and then checked
00:34:51.960 to see if they
00:34:52.560 were near
00:34:53.000 heat sinks.
00:34:55.340 89% of the
00:34:56.640 thermometers were
00:34:57.540 still near a
00:34:58.320 heat island.
00:35:00.960 89% of the
00:35:02.400 thermometers still,
00:35:04.560 like right now,
00:35:06.560 are next to a
00:35:07.240 heat island.
00:35:09.000 No, there was
00:35:09.780 never any hope
00:35:10.580 that you could
00:35:11.000 measure the
00:35:11.480 temperature of
00:35:12.060 the earth.
00:35:13.560 It was
00:35:14.100 ridiculous.
00:35:15.560 No.
00:35:16.160 No, in fact,
00:35:17.180 it's entirely
00:35:18.120 possible that
00:35:19.420 all of the
00:35:20.040 warming is just
00:35:20.800 that.
00:35:21.740 I don't know.
00:35:24.060 And then if you
00:35:24.860 measure the
00:35:25.440 satellites, if the
00:35:26.860 satellites are done
00:35:27.680 for the temperature,
00:35:28.760 you don't have
00:35:29.260 much history.
00:35:30.980 So the satellites
00:35:31.680 have only been
00:35:32.340 doing their
00:35:32.820 things since
00:35:33.680 the 70s,
00:35:35.560 maybe?
00:35:36.340 So then you
00:35:37.120 would have to
00:35:38.520 splice it
00:35:39.620 together with
00:35:40.180 some other way
00:35:41.100 of measuring it
00:35:41.780 before that,
00:35:42.880 and if they
00:35:43.400 were not
00:35:43.820 comparable, it
00:35:45.100 might look like
00:35:45.720 things have
00:35:46.280 gone up lately,
00:35:47.180 when in fact
00:35:48.680 you're just
00:35:49.120 bad at
00:35:49.460 measuring stuff.
00:35:51.920 Here's another
00:35:52.600 measurement problem.
00:35:54.040 Apparently the
00:35:54.680 thermometers are
00:35:55.700 looking for the
00:35:57.180 high of the
00:35:57.880 day and the
00:35:58.680 low of the
00:35:59.220 day.
00:36:00.660 So that's
00:36:02.040 all they're
00:36:02.320 measuring, the
00:36:03.020 high and the
00:36:03.560 low.
00:36:04.300 Do you think
00:36:04.680 that gets the
00:36:05.300 job done?
00:36:07.040 No.
00:36:08.180 Because it
00:36:08.800 turns out that
00:36:09.980 there are these
00:36:10.620 temporary biases.
00:36:13.520 So in other
00:36:13.980 words, let's
00:36:14.800 say you're not
00:36:16.420 too close to
00:36:17.260 an airport,
00:36:18.540 but there's
00:36:19.260 an airport
00:36:19.720 down the
00:36:20.620 road or
00:36:20.900 something.
00:36:21.740 A shift in
00:36:22.520 the wind
00:36:23.040 could take
00:36:24.860 your already
00:36:25.400 high temperature,
00:36:26.840 zing it up a
00:36:27.540 degree or two,
00:36:29.120 and then the
00:36:29.800 wind changes and
00:36:30.540 it goes back to
00:36:31.180 where it was.
00:36:32.260 So what was
00:36:32.820 the temperature?
00:36:34.880 Did it reach a
00:36:35.740 new high?
00:36:36.680 Or did the
00:36:37.420 wind blow?
00:36:39.420 See, you're
00:36:40.560 not even close
00:36:41.600 to having the
00:36:42.880 right technology
00:36:43.760 in the right
00:36:44.380 place long
00:36:45.700 enough and a
00:36:47.480 low enough
00:36:47.880 level of
00:36:48.480 complexity that
00:36:50.140 you can know
00:36:50.540 you can do
00:36:50.960 it right.
00:36:51.560 We're nowhere
00:36:52.080 near human
00:36:53.600 beings being
00:36:54.540 able to measure
00:36:55.160 the temperature
00:36:55.740 of the earth
00:36:56.260 and do it
00:36:57.660 over time and
00:36:58.400 know what's
00:36:58.800 changing.
00:37:01.140 Now, to be
00:37:02.040 clear, I'm not
00:37:02.660 saying the world
00:37:03.500 isn't getting
00:37:04.000 warmer, and I'm
00:37:05.200 not saying that
00:37:06.000 humans have no
00:37:06.980 role in it.
00:37:07.560 I'm saying
00:37:08.960 that if you
00:37:09.800 think you can
00:37:10.280 measure it,
00:37:11.680 that's crazy.
00:37:13.480 And everybody
00:37:14.120 who's had any
00:37:14.860 experience in
00:37:15.600 big companies
00:37:16.200 and doing any
00:37:17.420 kind of data
00:37:18.020 related work,
00:37:19.300 they'll all tell
00:37:19.940 you the same
00:37:20.340 thing.
00:37:21.280 I'll bet there
00:37:21.740 wasn't a single
00:37:22.560 data budget
00:37:24.540 analysis I ever
00:37:25.820 did in my
00:37:26.900 entire corporate
00:37:27.720 career that was
00:37:29.160 accurate or real.
00:37:31.080 You don't even
00:37:31.920 try, really,
00:37:32.960 because it's not
00:37:33.720 an option.
00:37:35.200 If doing it
00:37:35.940 accurately and real
00:37:37.380 was an option,
00:37:38.460 I would have
00:37:38.960 done that.
00:37:40.200 You know, I
00:37:40.640 would have been
00:37:40.960 fired.
00:37:42.660 Because really,
00:37:43.460 you have to do
00:37:43.820 what your boss
00:37:44.260 wants it to be.
00:37:45.580 If you come up
00:37:46.500 with an outcome
00:37:47.440 that makes your
00:37:48.520 boss unhappy,
00:37:49.260 you've got to
00:37:49.600 go back and do
00:37:50.140 it.
00:37:50.660 Do it a
00:37:51.040 different way.
00:37:53.960 So I would
00:37:54.700 say that maybe
00:37:56.140 the jig is
00:37:57.280 almost up for
00:37:58.280 the science
00:38:00.440 community in
00:38:02.900 the climate
00:38:03.240 science world.
00:38:04.520 And by the
00:38:04.880 way, who knows
00:38:06.140 what the actual
00:38:06.820 danger is,
00:38:07.840 but I don't
00:38:08.700 trust any of
00:38:09.240 the science.
00:38:11.160 All right.
00:38:12.980 There's a PBS
00:38:13.980 documentary talking
00:38:15.000 about the famed
00:38:16.260 January 6th
00:38:17.200 committee that
00:38:17.780 held all those
00:38:18.360 hearings.
00:38:19.500 And although we
00:38:20.240 knew this,
00:38:21.140 it's just shocking
00:38:21.960 to see it put
00:38:23.140 together in a
00:38:24.040 documentary,
00:38:25.320 that the
00:38:27.000 January 6th
00:38:27.840 committee people
00:38:28.560 hired the
00:38:30.140 former president
00:38:31.000 of ABC News,
00:38:32.160 James Goldston,
00:38:32.900 to produce it
00:38:34.640 like a
00:38:35.080 miniseries.
00:38:36.840 So he had
00:38:37.620 the idea that
00:38:38.260 you need to
00:38:38.800 have the drama
00:38:39.840 and the
00:38:40.320 pageantry and
00:38:41.080 the showmanship
00:38:41.600 and drag it
00:38:43.120 out in the
00:38:43.620 right order
00:38:44.120 so that it
00:38:45.060 would have
00:38:45.260 the maximum
00:38:45.920 psychological
00:38:46.820 impact on
00:38:48.200 the public.
00:38:50.820 To which I
00:38:51.640 say, is
00:38:53.100 that why you
00:38:53.640 do hearings?
00:38:54.920 To manipulate
00:38:55.860 the public?
00:38:56.420 I thought the
00:38:58.000 point of the
00:38:58.400 hearings was to
00:38:59.200 find out if
00:38:59.820 something bad
00:39:00.620 had been done.
00:39:02.300 Were we trying
00:39:02.840 to look for a
00:39:03.420 criminal activity
00:39:04.180 to see if there
00:39:04.840 might be some
00:39:05.540 justice that
00:39:07.100 needed to be
00:39:07.560 applied?
00:39:08.900 Where's the
00:39:09.540 part about
00:39:10.080 their main,
00:39:11.100 apparently their
00:39:11.860 main focus was
00:39:13.080 literally propaganda.
00:39:14.940 And they're so
00:39:15.740 proud of it that
00:39:17.460 they're even
00:39:18.480 talking about it
00:39:19.220 on camera.
00:39:20.180 So, oh yeah,
00:39:21.020 we were real
00:39:21.600 concerned about
00:39:22.340 how this came
00:39:23.680 across, so we
00:39:24.480 hired somebody to
00:39:25.320 really package it
00:39:26.080 up like a TV
00:39:26.800 show, so we
00:39:28.420 could really
00:39:28.800 brainwash and
00:39:29.560 propagandize the
00:39:30.400 American people.
00:39:31.520 And man, we
00:39:31.940 did a good job
00:39:32.620 of it.
00:39:32.920 We're quite happy
00:39:33.820 about it.
00:39:35.820 Yeah.
00:39:36.640 We knew it.
00:39:38.860 The part that's
00:39:39.600 new is that
00:39:40.380 they're bragging
00:39:40.920 about it in a
00:39:41.700 documentary.
00:39:42.900 Like they think
00:39:43.860 it's okay.
00:39:45.500 This isn't okay.
00:39:47.620 This is so not
00:39:48.500 okay.
00:39:50.920 Totally not
00:39:51.720 okay.
00:39:52.900 And it's a
00:39:53.420 documentary where
00:39:54.320 they're bragging
00:39:54.780 about it.
00:39:55.240 And they
00:39:56.260 probably would
00:39:56.920 do it again.
00:39:59.040 All right,
00:39:59.560 here's a tiny
00:40:00.400 story that could
00:40:01.160 be an interesting
00:40:01.780 story.
00:40:02.380 I don't think
00:40:02.940 anything's going
00:40:03.540 to come of
00:40:03.920 this, but we'll
00:40:04.480 see.
00:40:05.260 Apparently,
00:40:05.820 before Joe
00:40:06.360 Biden got
00:40:08.680 the Ukrainian
00:40:10.240 prosecutor, Shokin,
00:40:11.740 fired, when he
00:40:12.800 went over there in
00:40:13.520 person, there
00:40:14.960 were some drafts
00:40:16.140 of speeches in
00:40:17.880 which he was
00:40:18.920 talking about that
00:40:19.620 situation that
00:40:21.220 some people
00:40:22.280 say, but we
00:40:23.960 don't have
00:40:24.360 confirmation, his
00:40:26.040 early speeches
00:40:26.760 may have been in
00:40:27.460 conflict with
00:40:28.860 him saying that
00:40:29.500 everybody wanted
00:40:30.120 to fire this
00:40:30.740 guy and that
00:40:31.960 he just did
00:40:32.940 what everybody
00:40:33.400 wanted.
00:40:34.720 So I would
00:40:36.280 say I wouldn't
00:40:36.820 get too excited
00:40:37.460 about it, but
00:40:38.580 the number of
00:40:39.540 Krakens that are
00:40:40.400 out there that
00:40:41.540 sound like they
00:40:42.280 could be something,
00:40:43.880 there are a lot
00:40:44.360 of them now.
00:40:45.440 Probably most of
00:40:46.240 them will turn
00:40:46.700 it to nothing.
00:40:47.820 But I guess
00:40:48.320 the White
00:40:49.400 House is just
00:40:50.000 refusing to
00:40:51.920 produce said
00:40:54.060 document if
00:40:54.880 said document
00:40:55.520 exists, and
00:40:56.680 if it does
00:40:57.100 exist, I'm
00:40:57.680 sure they've
00:40:58.060 destroyed it by
00:40:58.760 now, because
00:41:00.020 the penalty for
00:41:00.940 destroying it
00:41:01.760 apparently is
00:41:02.800 nothing, but
00:41:04.160 the penalty for
00:41:05.260 giving something
00:41:06.520 embarrassing to
00:41:07.560 the other side
00:41:10.780 would be even
00:41:11.280 worse.
00:41:11.600 So, what
00:41:17.940 am I looking
00:41:18.380 at?
00:41:20.980 All right.
00:41:23.700 So let's
00:41:24.340 talk about the
00:41:26.720 first city on
00:41:28.000 the moon.
00:41:29.500 I saw
00:41:30.160 somebody tweeting
00:41:30.880 the question,
00:41:32.740 someday there'll
00:41:33.840 be a first city
00:41:34.620 on the moon,
00:41:35.200 what should be
00:41:35.620 called?
00:41:36.780 If you had to
00:41:37.360 name the first
00:41:38.320 city on the
00:41:38.900 moon, what
00:41:39.940 would you call
00:41:40.420 it?
00:41:40.720 I have a
00:41:41.200 suggestion.
00:41:41.600 Moscow.
00:41:45.100 Yeah, Moscow.
00:41:47.240 No?
00:41:51.400 Elonia?
00:41:53.920 Elongate?
00:41:57.900 Yeah, if it
00:41:58.620 has any kind
00:41:59.960 of a gate, it
00:42:01.640 would be the
00:42:02.160 Elongate.
00:42:03.680 All right.
00:42:06.080 Most of you
00:42:06.760 have already
00:42:07.020 heard the story
00:42:07.480 about Musk
00:42:08.460 being turned
00:42:09.080 down for his
00:42:10.420 $55 billion
00:42:11.420 pay package
00:42:12.540 that he
00:42:13.020 negotiated with
00:42:14.600 the board
00:42:14.980 back in
00:42:15.520 2017 or
00:42:16.560 18.
00:42:17.560 And here's
00:42:18.340 what maybe
00:42:18.880 you didn't
00:42:19.420 know, that
00:42:20.860 it was turned
00:42:21.360 down because
00:42:21.860 it was
00:42:22.320 seemingly
00:42:22.880 unfair and
00:42:24.260 he had too
00:42:24.640 many friends
00:42:25.060 on the
00:42:25.360 board.
00:42:26.600 Here's some
00:42:27.000 more background
00:42:27.500 to that.
00:42:28.000 The judge
00:42:30.660 judge, it's
00:42:33.600 always exactly
00:42:34.300 what you
00:42:34.700 think it
00:42:35.080 is.
00:42:36.140 It's
00:42:36.680 exactly what
00:42:37.460 you think
00:42:37.780 it is.
00:42:39.620 There's a
00:42:40.440 judge who
00:42:42.660 turned it
00:42:43.180 down, was
00:42:46.340 let's see,
00:42:47.140 Judge
00:42:47.820 McCormick, who
00:42:50.260 used to work
00:42:50.860 with Biden's
00:42:51.640 top donors
00:42:52.420 and was
00:42:54.660 nominated by
00:42:57.240 Biden's
00:42:57.900 close friend
00:42:58.660 and Hunter
00:43:02.120 Biden claimed
00:43:03.760 to personally
00:43:04.360 know every
00:43:04.940 judge on the
00:43:05.660 Delaware
00:43:06.040 Chancery Court,
00:43:07.840 so that's
00:43:08.320 actually in
00:43:08.740 recording, when
00:43:09.840 he was
00:43:10.100 threatening a
00:43:10.880 Chinese partner,
00:43:12.880 he told them
00:43:13.440 that he would
00:43:13.820 take him to
00:43:14.280 court and he
00:43:14.820 knows every
00:43:15.340 member personally
00:43:16.180 of the Delaware
00:43:16.940 Chancery Court.
00:43:19.140 Right.
00:43:19.700 So Delaware
00:43:20.320 is basically
00:43:21.000 owned by the
00:43:21.760 Bidens.
00:43:23.140 And so this
00:43:24.100 is the place
00:43:24.820 that they
00:43:25.680 found a
00:43:26.180 weakness they
00:43:26.740 could go
00:43:27.060 after Musk.
00:43:30.240 So every
00:43:31.440 bit of this
00:43:31.920 is corrupt.
00:43:33.220 It's exactly
00:43:33.980 what it looks
00:43:34.480 like.
00:43:36.380 The Bidens
00:43:37.100 are corrupt
00:43:37.880 owners of
00:43:38.560 Delaware.
00:43:39.560 Delaware is
00:43:40.220 where a lot
00:43:40.640 of corporations
00:43:41.340 put their
00:43:42.920 paperwork,
00:43:43.620 their paperwork
00:43:44.540 anyway.
00:43:45.260 It's a common
00:43:45.820 thing.
00:43:46.900 And so they
00:43:48.140 found this
00:43:48.560 weakness that
00:43:49.240 they own
00:43:49.560 Delaware so
00:43:50.200 they could
00:43:50.440 make Delaware
00:43:51.140 cost Musk
00:43:52.820 $55 billion.
00:43:55.060 Now Musk,
00:43:56.120 not to be
00:43:56.740 defeated by
00:43:57.420 such bullshittery,
00:43:59.280 has decided
00:43:59.920 that he did
00:44:01.780 a little survey
00:44:02.420 on X and
00:44:03.980 they suggest
00:44:05.700 he move his
00:44:06.460 corporation to
00:44:07.220 Texas.
00:44:09.060 Now,
00:44:09.920 and apparently
00:44:11.020 he's going to
00:44:11.440 do that.
00:44:13.140 Now some
00:44:13.660 have said
00:44:14.140 that there
00:44:17.500 should be an
00:44:18.020 easy way to
00:44:19.000 port your
00:44:20.120 corporation to
00:44:20.860 another state.
00:44:21.760 I think
00:44:22.080 Musk may have
00:44:23.040 said that.
00:44:23.840 But there
00:44:24.180 should be some
00:44:24.720 kind of
00:44:25.080 technology or
00:44:26.120 service or
00:44:26.740 process where
00:44:27.860 I could just
00:44:28.300 call somebody
00:44:28.900 and say,
00:44:29.720 hey, I'm
00:44:30.080 incorporated in
00:44:30.900 Delaware,
00:44:32.340 send me the
00:44:32.880 paperwork to
00:44:33.460 make it
00:44:33.740 Texas.
00:44:34.740 And then I
00:44:35.200 just sign
00:44:35.640 something.
00:44:36.700 And then it's
00:44:37.200 just Texas.
00:44:37.700 So if that
00:44:39.480 existed and
00:44:41.740 I knew the
00:44:42.540 ins and
00:44:42.900 outs, I
00:44:43.440 would move
00:44:44.400 my corporation
00:44:45.100 immediately.
00:44:47.560 So if that
00:44:48.660 becomes the
00:44:49.500 thing, because
00:44:50.000 I think Delaware
00:44:50.620 has to be
00:44:51.160 broken.
00:44:53.360 I think Delaware
00:44:54.660 has to be just
00:44:55.380 bankrupted,
00:44:56.220 treated like
00:44:56.980 Gaza, basically.
00:44:58.700 If Delaware
00:44:59.380 is going to
00:44:59.900 fuck the rest
00:45:00.540 of the country,
00:45:01.520 well then fuck
00:45:02.160 Delaware.
00:45:03.120 You can just
00:45:03.740 drown in the
00:45:04.260 ocean.
00:45:05.540 Your whole
00:45:06.560 little fucking
00:45:07.120 little state
00:45:07.720 can go to
00:45:08.240 shit, as
00:45:08.740 far as I
00:45:09.160 care.
00:45:09.760 If you're
00:45:10.160 going to let
00:45:10.400 your politicians
00:45:11.100 or even your
00:45:11.900 appointed people
00:45:12.620 do this,
00:45:13.880 totally unacceptable.
00:45:16.420 And if every
00:45:17.040 corporation moved
00:45:17.780 down to Delaware
00:45:18.400 and sent them
00:45:20.340 back to the
00:45:20.840 Stone Age, I'd
00:45:21.580 be fine with
00:45:22.100 it.
00:45:23.200 Not really.
00:45:24.040 I'm just a
00:45:24.480 little mad about
00:45:25.000 it.
00:45:26.180 What I think
00:45:26.900 will happen is
00:45:28.000 that Musk will
00:45:28.680 renegotiate and
00:45:30.420 it will get
00:45:31.060 reinstated probably
00:45:32.920 when he gets
00:45:33.380 back in Texas.
00:45:37.120 Now, what is
00:45:38.140 not reported
00:45:38.840 is that when
00:45:40.480 his initial
00:45:41.620 pay package
00:45:42.240 was put
00:45:44.480 together, it
00:45:46.940 was considered
00:45:47.640 by smart
00:45:48.360 people the
00:45:49.880 most risky
00:45:51.580 pay package
00:45:52.320 any CEO
00:45:53.880 ever did
00:45:54.560 because his
00:45:55.540 odds of
00:45:56.040 making a
00:45:56.500 penny were
00:45:56.920 very low.
00:45:58.640 His odds
00:45:59.360 of making
00:46:00.000 a penny,
00:46:01.720 a penny,
00:46:03.100 literally,
00:46:04.420 were low.
00:46:05.060 very low.
00:46:07.120 But he
00:46:07.460 killed it.
00:46:08.260 He ten
00:46:08.880 timesed it
00:46:09.500 by now.
00:46:10.920 So the
00:46:11.400 odds of him
00:46:11.940 doing that,
00:46:12.680 ten timesing a
00:46:13.720 brand new
00:46:14.100 thing that is
00:46:14.960 in the
00:46:15.200 industry where
00:46:15.780 almost everybody
00:46:16.440 goes out of
00:46:16.920 business,
00:46:17.740 it was a
00:46:19.000 very fair
00:46:19.800 agreement that
00:46:21.780 everybody fully
00:46:22.680 understood.
00:46:24.140 So I don't
00:46:24.840 think the
00:46:25.140 basis for
00:46:25.820 overturning it
00:46:26.960 has any
00:46:28.840 basis at all.
00:46:32.080 All right.
00:46:32.460 energy drinks
00:46:35.400 are bad for
00:46:35.920 kids, says
00:46:36.960 a new
00:46:37.240 study.
00:46:38.280 It's bad
00:46:38.960 for their
00:46:39.240 brains, they
00:46:39.860 have more
00:46:40.140 mental
00:46:40.440 disorders.
00:46:42.080 And
00:46:42.520 imagine
00:46:45.020 your teenage
00:46:45.780 kid now,
00:46:46.500 if you have
00:46:46.980 like a 15
00:46:47.820 year old,
00:46:48.480 just imagine
00:46:49.080 him.
00:46:50.060 He's got a
00:46:50.840 phone in one
00:46:51.380 hand with a
00:46:53.180 TikTok,
00:46:54.040 destroying his
00:46:54.660 brain.
00:46:55.700 He's got a
00:46:56.620 vape in his
00:46:57.540 other hand,
00:46:59.180 destroying his
00:46:59.840 brain.
00:47:00.160 And sitting
00:47:01.980 next to him
00:47:02.480 is his
00:47:02.800 energy drink,
00:47:04.800 destroying his
00:47:05.580 brain.
00:47:08.760 That would
00:47:09.800 describe maybe
00:47:13.240 half of all
00:47:14.040 the teenagers.
00:47:16.060 I'll bet at
00:47:16.540 least half of
00:47:17.060 them are doing
00:47:17.540 all three every
00:47:18.240 day, or
00:47:19.960 something like
00:47:20.300 that.
00:47:20.880 I don't know
00:47:21.360 what the vaping
00:47:22.000 ratio is, but
00:47:22.800 it's terrible.
00:47:24.020 So, we
00:47:30.100 really don't
00:47:30.720 give a shit
00:47:31.180 about kids
00:47:31.700 anymore, do
00:47:32.240 we?
00:47:32.940 Did we ever?
00:47:34.280 Did we ever
00:47:35.060 care about the
00:47:35.660 well-being of
00:47:36.240 children?
00:47:38.060 I mean, we're
00:47:38.640 basically ripping
00:47:39.400 their balls off
00:47:41.040 and letting
00:47:42.420 them vape and
00:47:43.340 use their phone
00:47:44.060 all day at
00:47:44.600 work.
00:47:45.020 We're letting
00:47:45.340 them have
00:47:45.600 TikTok.
00:47:47.380 We're shipping
00:47:48.160 fentanyl in
00:47:49.060 because we
00:47:49.540 can't seem to
00:47:50.120 figure out how
00:47:50.760 to stop it.
00:47:51.340 We can stop
00:47:51.980 it.
00:47:52.200 But we
00:47:53.740 don't try
00:47:54.220 hard enough.
00:47:57.320 It doesn't
00:47:58.200 look like we
00:47:59.800 care about
00:48:00.260 children.
00:48:01.260 Look at the
00:48:01.660 teachers'
00:48:02.100 union.
00:48:02.960 The teachers'
00:48:03.640 union is
00:48:04.060 basically child
00:48:05.240 abuse.
00:48:07.280 All the
00:48:07.900 evidence suggests
00:48:08.600 we don't
00:48:08.960 care.
00:48:10.580 All the
00:48:11.040 evidence suggests
00:48:12.180 as a, you
00:48:13.300 know, we
00:48:13.560 definitely care
00:48:14.440 as parents,
00:48:15.740 but as a
00:48:16.900 system, we
00:48:17.740 definitely don't
00:48:18.380 care.
00:48:20.200 All right,
00:48:20.920 Christopher
00:48:21.440 Ray, head of
00:48:22.120 the FBI, warns
00:48:23.360 us that
00:48:23.680 Chinese hackers
00:48:24.500 have a 50
00:48:26.880 to 1
00:48:27.180 advantage over
00:48:27.900 our hackers,
00:48:28.660 just so many
00:48:29.280 of them, and
00:48:30.280 they've already
00:48:30.680 gotten into our
00:48:31.360 major infrastructure
00:48:32.160 and they could
00:48:32.780 shut down the
00:48:33.420 entire country
00:48:34.060 and kill us
00:48:34.660 all with a
00:48:36.500 stroke of a
00:48:37.080 pen.
00:48:39.120 Do you
00:48:39.660 believe that?
00:48:41.620 Do you
00:48:42.200 believe that
00:48:42.800 they're already
00:48:43.280 in all of our
00:48:44.060 systems and
00:48:44.600 they can shut
00:48:45.100 down everything
00:48:45.640 like critical
00:48:46.800 infrastructure?
00:48:48.080 Basically,
00:48:48.740 starve the
00:48:49.180 country if they
00:48:49.700 wanted to.
00:48:50.040 Well, maybe,
00:48:53.780 but didn't
00:48:54.360 they say that
00:48:54.880 about Ukraine?
00:48:56.940 Wasn't
00:48:57.460 Russia going to
00:48:58.360 take down
00:48:58.900 everything in
00:48:59.560 Ukraine with
00:49:00.180 their great
00:49:00.540 hacking?
00:49:02.180 And as far
00:49:03.840 as I know,
00:49:05.560 Ukraine had
00:49:06.460 no real
00:49:07.060 problems?
00:49:08.600 Am I wrong?
00:49:10.080 So I'm not
00:49:10.900 sure we know
00:49:11.380 how to predict
00:49:11.980 this stuff.
00:49:13.040 We might be
00:49:13.800 terrible at
00:49:14.300 predicting it
00:49:14.980 because we're
00:49:15.600 also terrible
00:49:16.160 at knowing
00:49:17.100 in advance
00:49:17.660 how we
00:49:18.040 would address
00:49:18.640 it.
00:49:19.540 Maybe we're
00:49:21.080 a little bit
00:49:21.600 better at
00:49:22.120 recovering.
00:49:23.700 I don't
00:49:23.840 know.
00:49:25.900 It's scary
00:49:26.600 as hell.
00:49:28.600 And then
00:49:28.920 also, at the
00:49:29.980 same time that
00:49:30.640 the FBI was
00:49:31.560 testifying about
00:49:33.520 how much
00:49:34.720 China has
00:49:36.140 hacked the
00:49:36.480 United States,
00:49:37.880 a Russian
00:49:38.600 group of
00:49:39.640 hackers were
00:49:40.260 hacking data
00:49:42.240 from the FBI.
00:49:43.000 that's right.
00:49:45.640 While
00:49:46.040 Christopher Wray
00:49:46.800 was testifying
00:49:47.560 about the
00:49:48.000 Chinese hacking
00:49:48.660 everything,
00:49:49.960 a bunch of
00:49:50.900 data was
00:49:51.920 being hacked
00:49:52.460 by Russian
00:49:53.000 ransomware
00:49:53.600 group, and
00:49:55.140 they got a
00:49:55.520 bunch of
00:49:55.820 data that
00:49:56.260 includes data
00:49:57.200 from the
00:49:57.600 FBI.
00:49:58.900 And that's
00:49:59.560 a lot of
00:49:59.960 it.
00:50:01.100 I don't know
00:50:01.620 exactly what
00:50:02.200 data they got
00:50:02.780 from the FBI,
00:50:03.620 but none of
00:50:03.960 that sounds
00:50:04.380 good.
00:50:07.540 Is this
00:50:08.180 bad news
00:50:08.700 or good?
00:50:11.020 I contend
00:50:11.940 that we
00:50:12.320 humans can't
00:50:12.980 tell the
00:50:13.280 difference
00:50:13.580 between good
00:50:14.300 news and
00:50:14.720 bad.
00:50:15.780 Do you
00:50:16.020 know how
00:50:16.340 I read
00:50:16.720 it?
00:50:18.080 Why would
00:50:18.740 you ever
00:50:19.120 use a
00:50:19.520 nuclear
00:50:19.820 bomb?
00:50:22.180 If this
00:50:22.840 is real,
00:50:24.000 why would
00:50:25.820 you ever
00:50:26.060 use a
00:50:26.360 nuclear
00:50:26.620 weapon?
00:50:28.440 And we
00:50:29.040 have mutually
00:50:29.580 assured
00:50:30.020 destruction
00:50:30.560 if it's
00:50:31.120 real.
00:50:31.780 If it's
00:50:32.380 real that
00:50:32.800 China has
00:50:33.260 already
00:50:33.660 burrowed
00:50:34.700 into our
00:50:35.060 system and
00:50:35.520 we can't
00:50:35.900 get them
00:50:36.140 out,
00:50:37.080 I feel
00:50:37.620 like it's
00:50:38.000 real that
00:50:38.360 we've done
00:50:38.700 the same
00:50:39.060 thing to
00:50:39.400 them.
00:50:40.500 In Russia,
00:50:41.300 the same
00:50:41.600 thing.
00:50:41.840 So did
00:50:43.540 we
00:50:43.760 somewhat,
00:50:45.140 without
00:50:46.020 realizing it,
00:50:47.600 drift into
00:50:48.360 a situation
00:50:49.000 where nuclear
00:50:49.760 war is
00:50:50.540 just sort
00:50:51.160 of stupid?
00:50:52.440 Because even
00:50:53.180 if you
00:50:53.500 wanted a
00:50:53.980 war of
00:50:54.720 tremendous
00:50:55.560 destruction,
00:50:56.820 you wouldn't
00:50:57.780 use a
00:50:58.120 nuke.
00:50:58.920 You just
00:50:59.620 push the
00:51:00.040 button on
00:51:00.420 your cyber
00:51:01.280 machine and
00:51:02.960 take them
00:51:03.360 down.
00:51:03.620 But even
00:51:06.500 an EMP
00:51:07.120 doesn't
00:51:07.560 make sense
00:51:08.200 if you
00:51:08.640 can take
00:51:09.020 them down
00:51:09.320 with a
00:51:09.620 hack.
00:51:10.380 Because
00:51:10.820 everybody
00:51:11.200 would agree
00:51:11.820 that if
00:51:13.180 you had a
00:51:13.520 choice,
00:51:14.380 you would
00:51:14.740 defeat your
00:51:15.220 enemies in
00:51:15.760 ways that
00:51:16.240 could be
00:51:16.520 easily
00:51:16.820 recoverable
00:51:17.580 for a
00:51:19.440 variety of
00:51:19.860 reasons.
00:51:21.720 So,
00:51:22.760 you know,
00:51:24.200 we might be
00:51:25.060 better off.
00:51:26.140 It's entirely
00:51:26.640 possible that
00:51:27.440 this increased
00:51:30.240 the ability
00:51:30.940 of humankind
00:51:32.100 to survive.
00:51:34.320 But it
00:51:35.120 could also
00:51:35.440 kill us
00:51:35.840 all.
00:51:40.360 I have an
00:51:41.140 idea that I
00:51:41.820 just want to
00:51:42.240 put out
00:51:42.620 there.
00:51:45.060 Why is it
00:51:45.860 that the
00:51:46.140 United States
00:51:46.800 doesn't have
00:51:47.660 personal
00:51:48.460 meetings with
00:51:49.740 the Ayatollah
00:51:50.740 and the
00:51:51.220 leadership of
00:51:51.920 Iran?
00:51:53.400 Now, I
00:51:54.020 think you're
00:51:54.440 going to
00:51:54.580 say, but
00:51:55.780 we've tried
00:51:56.780 and they
00:51:57.300 say no,
00:51:58.060 or you're
00:51:58.500 going to
00:51:58.620 say, but
00:51:59.520 you can
00:52:00.240 never meet
00:52:00.680 with terrorists
00:52:01.360 or,
00:52:02.100 but somebody
00:52:04.080 wouldn't like
00:52:04.760 it, or
00:52:05.400 there's some
00:52:06.520 reason, right?
00:52:08.680 Or they'll
00:52:09.940 refuse to
00:52:10.620 talk.
00:52:11.880 Do you
00:52:12.200 think any
00:52:12.680 of that
00:52:12.960 applies to
00:52:13.560 Trump?
00:52:15.660 I feel like
00:52:16.600 Trump could
00:52:17.040 say, here's
00:52:17.900 the deal.
00:52:18.840 I think
00:52:19.600 Trump could
00:52:20.120 do something
00:52:20.800 that would
00:52:22.460 be the
00:52:22.780 greatest
00:52:23.140 thing in
00:52:25.380 human
00:52:25.740 civilization.
00:52:27.940 He could
00:52:28.680 tell Putin
00:52:30.380 and she
00:52:31.160 and she
00:52:31.180 and the
00:52:32.100 Ayatollah.
00:52:33.200 I just
00:52:33.800 want to
00:52:34.040 be with
00:52:34.400 you guys
00:52:34.940 and maybe
00:52:35.360 one European
00:52:37.760 Union person
00:52:39.060 or NATO
00:52:39.540 or something
00:52:40.060 just to get
00:52:41.660 Europe involved
00:52:42.280 and just
00:52:43.380 say, look,
00:52:44.700 sit in the
00:52:45.140 room and
00:52:45.720 you say,
00:52:46.420 there are
00:52:47.100 four people
00:52:47.700 who can
00:52:48.020 destroy the
00:52:48.640 world,
00:52:49.160 maybe five.
00:52:50.820 It's us.
00:52:52.360 If the
00:52:52.960 five of us
00:52:53.520 decide not
00:52:54.160 to destroy
00:52:54.680 the world
00:52:55.180 and we
00:52:55.900 decide to
00:52:56.420 live in
00:52:56.780 peace,
00:52:57.240 we could
00:52:57.700 probably
00:52:58.020 work it
00:52:58.420 out because
00:53:00.040 we don't
00:53:00.680 really want
00:53:01.220 to occupy
00:53:02.520 China.
00:53:03.980 We don't
00:53:04.640 want to
00:53:05.060 occupy
00:53:05.920 Russia.
00:53:07.540 We sort
00:53:08.320 of want
00:53:08.600 to have
00:53:08.860 our own
00:53:09.280 domain of
00:53:09.860 influence.
00:53:10.900 We know
00:53:11.580 you're going
00:53:11.940 to have
00:53:12.180 your own
00:53:12.520 domain of
00:53:13.020 influence and
00:53:13.980 we should
00:53:14.300 just divide
00:53:14.940 up the
00:53:15.260 world now.
00:53:17.000 Just divide
00:53:17.580 it up.
00:53:19.700 Then you
00:53:20.220 said to
00:53:20.600 yourself,
00:53:21.700 Scott,
00:53:22.160 you're so
00:53:22.460 naive.
00:53:23.600 You can't
00:53:24.040 divide it
00:53:24.440 up because
00:53:24.720 we don't
00:53:25.080 agree who
00:53:26.020 owns what.
00:53:26.780 What are
00:53:27.360 you going
00:53:27.520 to do
00:53:27.680 about
00:53:27.880 Taiwan?
00:53:28.880 How are
00:53:29.200 you going
00:53:29.320 to divide
00:53:29.800 that up,
00:53:30.380 Scott?
00:53:31.180 I could
00:53:31.520 do that.
00:53:32.680 Here's how.
00:53:33.960 I say we
00:53:34.580 all agree that
00:53:35.260 China and
00:53:36.100 Taiwan should
00:53:36.660 be one
00:53:37.040 country,
00:53:37.860 so we'll
00:53:38.480 make a
00:53:38.820 100-year
00:53:39.460 plan to
00:53:40.640 put them
00:53:41.220 together.
00:53:42.040 Because in
00:53:42.720 100 years,
00:53:43.440 nothing's
00:53:43.840 predictable.
00:53:45.280 Nothing's
00:53:45.740 predictable.
00:53:46.620 We might
00:53:47.240 have no
00:53:47.680 need for
00:53:48.480 Taiwan
00:53:49.600 semiconductors.
00:53:51.660 China,
00:53:52.180 mainland,
00:53:52.800 might be a
00:53:53.300 democracy by
00:53:54.060 then.
00:53:55.240 Taiwan might
00:53:55.940 have turned
00:53:56.260 into a
00:53:56.620 dictatorship by
00:53:57.360 then.
00:53:58.320 Maybe
00:53:58.620 technology makes
00:53:59.580 governments
00:54:00.140 unnecessary.
00:54:01.560 Maybe the
00:54:01.960 robots have
00:54:02.520 changed everything.
00:54:03.360 Maybe AI is
00:54:04.080 doing everything.
00:54:05.360 So you
00:54:05.920 finesse it
00:54:07.060 because you
00:54:07.720 can't solve
00:54:08.260 it.
00:54:08.960 You just
00:54:09.360 say,
00:54:09.740 our plan
00:54:10.240 will be,
00:54:11.300 in 100
00:54:11.760 years,
00:54:12.860 Taiwan will
00:54:13.440 be a part
00:54:14.360 of China,
00:54:15.140 one way or
00:54:15.660 another.
00:54:16.440 If 100
00:54:17.160 years later
00:54:17.740 it's a bad
00:54:18.220 idea, you
00:54:18.740 just don't
00:54:19.180 do it.
00:54:20.560 That's it.
00:54:21.180 You just
00:54:21.420 renege.
00:54:21.840 Well, it's
00:54:22.760 been 100
00:54:23.100 years and
00:54:23.700 still we
00:54:25.280 think we
00:54:25.660 should be a
00:54:26.040 separate
00:54:26.240 country.
00:54:27.800 So you
00:54:28.080 just do
00:54:28.360 it.
00:54:29.040 But here's
00:54:29.460 what I
00:54:29.700 think Trump
00:54:30.340 could do
00:54:30.760 that no
00:54:31.200 one in
00:54:31.500 history could
00:54:31.980 do.
00:54:33.460 He could
00:54:34.000 put him
00:54:34.240 in the
00:54:34.440 same room
00:54:34.880 and he
00:54:35.900 could say
00:54:36.200 we literally,
00:54:37.180 the people
00:54:37.620 in this
00:54:37.920 room,
00:54:38.220 can decide
00:54:38.700 the future
00:54:39.200 of humanity.
00:54:40.900 I think
00:54:41.500 we should
00:54:41.800 decide to
00:54:42.300 all live.
00:54:43.480 I think
00:54:43.900 China could
00:54:44.480 do great
00:54:45.040 if you
00:54:45.740 just stop
00:54:46.220 messing with
00:54:46.960 us and
00:54:47.720 we can
00:54:48.040 stop messing
00:54:48.560 with you
00:54:48.960 and you
00:54:49.620 don't
00:54:49.780 try to
00:54:50.080 undermine
00:54:50.400 us.
00:54:51.220 How about
00:54:51.520 we stop
00:54:52.040 trying to
00:54:52.460 overthrow
00:54:52.800 Putin
00:54:53.240 and Putin
00:54:54.500 you stop
00:54:55.040 trying to
00:54:55.400 do whatever
00:54:55.860 it is
00:54:56.140 you're doing
00:54:56.420 with us.
00:54:57.820 Now I
00:54:58.560 think the
00:54:59.000 big complainers
00:55:00.440 to that
00:55:00.800 would be
00:55:01.260 American
00:55:01.840 because I
00:55:03.520 think a lot
00:55:04.020 of it is
00:55:04.400 about our
00:55:04.780 energy
00:55:05.180 companies
00:55:05.780 wanting to
00:55:06.320 maximize
00:55:06.720 their global
00:55:07.440 influence.
00:55:08.340 I don't
00:55:08.740 think it's
00:55:09.040 really political.
00:55:10.640 So Trump
00:55:11.380 is probably
00:55:11.820 the only
00:55:12.240 president who
00:55:13.420 could piss
00:55:14.220 off our
00:55:14.700 own energy
00:55:16.080 people and
00:55:18.440 say look
00:55:18.940 we won't
00:55:20.040 bug you
00:55:20.520 Russia
00:55:20.880 just go
00:55:22.280 pull your
00:55:22.720 energy
00:55:23.000 out of
00:55:23.280 the ground
00:55:23.640 we'll
00:55:23.940 compete
00:55:24.320 on level
00:55:25.200 playing field
00:55:25.880 but we're
00:55:26.920 not going
00:55:27.160 to try
00:55:27.360 to take
00:55:27.680 your energy
00:55:28.220 or close
00:55:29.000 you off
00:55:29.320 our markets
00:55:29.820 we're just
00:55:30.180 going to
00:55:30.420 try to
00:55:30.680 outcompete
00:55:31.120 you.
00:55:32.140 I think
00:55:32.900 Trump
00:55:33.240 could sell
00:55:33.820 a grand
00:55:35.200 bargain
00:55:35.620 in a way
00:55:37.560 that similar
00:55:38.560 to how he
00:55:39.080 went to
00:55:39.460 North Korea
00:55:40.060 and similar
00:55:42.320 to how his
00:55:43.460 administration
00:55:43.980 got an
00:55:44.560 Abraham
00:55:44.880 Accord
00:55:45.380 he's a
00:55:47.140 singular
00:55:47.700 creature.
00:55:48.940 and when
00:55:49.800 he walks
00:55:50.260 into a
00:55:50.700 room
00:55:51.040 everybody
00:55:51.960 else in
00:55:52.440 the room
00:55:52.740 becomes a
00:55:53.280 deal
00:55:53.460 maker.
00:55:55.460 Think about
00:55:56.280 that.
00:55:57.100 When Trump
00:55:57.620 walks in
00:55:58.080 the room
00:55:58.460 the other
00:55:59.760 leaders
00:56:00.220 turn into
00:56:01.060 deal makers
00:56:01.660 because he's
00:56:03.120 a deal maker
00:56:03.620 and that's
00:56:04.480 how you have
00:56:04.920 to deal
00:56:05.200 with him.
00:56:06.100 So he
00:56:06.400 could actually
00:56:06.840 change people
00:56:07.600 into deal
00:56:08.160 makers and I
00:56:08.920 think he
00:56:09.220 could sell
00:56:09.720 a grand
00:56:10.320 bargain
00:56:10.740 where we
00:56:11.740 decide to
00:56:13.300 have peace
00:56:14.140 in the
00:56:14.380 Middle East
00:56:14.940 Taiwan
00:56:15.940 and you
00:56:17.160 just basically
00:56:17.780 settle all
00:56:18.600 of it.
00:56:19.420 Just settle
00:56:19.880 all of it.
00:56:21.480 And you
00:56:22.500 know some
00:56:22.800 of it with
00:56:23.160 the timer
00:56:23.620 saying well
00:56:24.520 we can't
00:56:25.000 settle Gaza
00:56:25.740 but we
00:56:26.840 got this
00:56:27.260 50 year
00:56:27.860 plan to
00:56:28.500 do something
00:56:29.120 this or
00:56:29.720 that.
00:56:30.900 Only Trump
00:56:31.680 could do
00:56:32.020 that.
00:56:33.100 Only Trump.
00:56:34.500 He could
00:56:35.100 actually create
00:56:36.000 something like
00:56:36.860 peace till
00:56:37.580 the end of
00:56:38.000 time.
00:56:39.580 Good.
00:56:40.120 All right
00:56:43.360 here's my
00:56:45.060 update on
00:56:45.620 national debt
00:56:46.380 and my
00:56:47.860 update is
00:56:48.320 always why
00:56:49.280 don't I
00:56:49.660 understand
00:56:50.120 this.
00:56:51.500 Why is it
00:56:51.980 that when we
00:56:53.020 thought we'd
00:56:53.540 run up the
00:56:54.000 debt to a
00:56:54.480 trillion dollars
00:56:55.240 one trillion
00:56:55.980 we thought we
00:56:57.100 were doomed
00:56:57.620 but now that
00:56:59.000 it's 35
00:57:00.460 trillion or
00:57:01.200 whatever it
00:57:01.560 is we're
00:57:03.060 not doomed.
00:57:04.760 How could
00:57:05.440 we be off
00:57:06.040 by a factor
00:57:06.900 of 35
00:57:07.520 now time
00:57:08.820 value of
00:57:09.300 money it's
00:57:09.720 not 35
00:57:10.300 maybe it's
00:57:11.120 more like
00:57:11.440 10.
00:57:13.580 But 10
00:57:14.980 times bigger
00:57:16.680 than a
00:57:17.260 catastrophic
00:57:17.680 number?
00:57:19.860 Why are
00:57:20.580 we all
00:57:20.900 alive?
00:57:23.440 Then I
00:57:23.960 hear smart
00:57:25.760 people who
00:57:26.440 know more
00:57:26.740 than I do
00:57:27.180 say but
00:57:28.320 our debt
00:57:28.700 to GDP
00:57:29.260 is still
00:57:30.000 lower than
00:57:30.500 Japan and
00:57:31.160 like way
00:57:31.580 lower and
00:57:32.620 Japan's not
00:57:33.280 going under
00:57:34.180 so as
00:57:35.840 long as
00:57:36.240 our GDP
00:57:36.840 grows we
00:57:38.280 can handle
00:57:38.840 ever increasing
00:57:39.700 debt.
00:57:41.440 Now that's
00:57:42.320 true if
00:57:43.800 the rates
00:57:44.460 are right.
00:57:46.740 So in
00:57:47.000 other words
00:57:47.480 if the
00:57:47.900 rate of
00:57:48.960 growth of
00:57:49.520 our debt
00:57:50.020 is slower
00:57:50.880 than the
00:57:51.360 rate of
00:57:51.840 growth of
00:57:52.260 our GDP
00:57:52.820 we'll be
00:57:53.980 fine.
00:57:55.740 But is
00:57:57.040 that happening?
00:57:59.140 I feel like
00:58:00.060 our debt is
00:58:00.620 growing faster
00:58:01.360 than our GDP
00:58:02.080 but I haven't
00:58:02.660 looked into it.
00:58:04.040 I feel like
00:58:04.620 there's no
00:58:05.060 chance that
00:58:05.600 that works.
00:58:06.200 but I
00:58:07.480 saw
00:58:07.660 Mnuchin
00:58:08.160 acting like
00:58:08.800 well you
00:58:09.200 know our
00:58:10.180 debt to
00:58:10.780 GDP is
00:58:11.400 fine.
00:58:13.400 You know
00:58:13.600 we can't
00:58:14.160 let it
00:58:14.400 get higher
00:58:14.840 but you
00:58:15.280 know we're
00:58:16.500 in a zone
00:58:17.280 where it's
00:58:17.680 not going
00:58:17.960 to kill
00:58:18.180 us.
00:58:20.760 So yes
00:58:21.600 our debt
00:58:22.100 is greater
00:58:22.580 than our
00:58:22.980 GDP but
00:58:23.740 Japan's debt
00:58:24.580 is even
00:58:25.140 greater than
00:58:26.700 our ratio
00:58:27.360 of debt
00:58:28.680 to GDP.
00:58:29.540 Like a lot
00:58:30.080 it's a lot
00:58:30.580 more actually.
00:58:32.040 So I
00:58:33.120 will just
00:58:33.500 say as
00:58:34.160 Mnuchin
00:58:34.880 says as
00:58:36.040 long as
00:58:36.540 the United
00:58:36.920 States has
00:58:37.500 better
00:58:37.880 currency than
00:58:38.760 the other
00:58:39.100 places we
00:58:41.700 kind of
00:58:42.140 limp along.
00:58:43.740 But if
00:58:44.180 anybody ever
00:58:44.740 came up
00:58:45.200 with a
00:58:45.440 currency that
00:58:46.040 was better
00:58:46.460 than the
00:58:47.180 dollar we'd
00:58:47.740 be in big
00:58:48.140 trouble.
00:58:48.980 And I do
00:58:49.540 see that that's
00:58:50.140 a possibility
00:58:50.760 someday.
00:58:52.300 Maybe a
00:58:52.740 digital currency.
00:58:54.100 All right
00:58:54.240 let's talk
00:58:54.600 about Israel.
00:58:56.040 I'm not
00:58:56.740 going to give
00:58:57.100 you the
00:58:57.360 number because
00:58:58.620 it's so
00:58:59.080 unreliable.
00:58:59.900 well but
00:59:00.800 Hamas is
00:59:02.700 coming out
00:59:03.160 with a new
00:59:04.000 set of
00:59:04.340 numbers for
00:59:04.960 what they
00:59:05.360 claim are
00:59:05.800 the deaths
00:59:06.240 and claim
00:59:07.340 are the
00:59:07.800 injured.
00:59:08.660 Now by
00:59:09.060 any measure
00:59:09.720 it's way
00:59:10.640 too many
00:59:11.040 people being
00:59:12.580 killed and
00:59:13.040 injured.
00:59:13.960 So from
00:59:14.660 the human
00:59:15.300 being perspective
00:59:16.180 we should all
00:59:16.960 acknowledge that
00:59:18.220 one death is
00:59:19.180 too many and
00:59:20.520 this many is
00:59:21.340 just an
00:59:22.180 alarming
00:59:22.500 frightening
00:59:22.980 figure.
00:59:24.020 But if
00:59:24.940 you don't
00:59:25.280 see the
00:59:25.780 play that's
00:59:26.280 developing you
00:59:27.580 should.
00:59:28.480 Because if
00:59:29.120 Hamas can
00:59:29.820 lie that
00:59:30.740 number up
00:59:31.300 big enough
00:59:31.940 and they're
00:59:32.540 doing a
00:59:32.860 good job
00:59:33.220 of it
00:59:33.560 they've
00:59:34.860 got a
00:59:35.140 number that
00:59:35.620 essentially
00:59:36.300 it's checkmate
00:59:38.900 or check
00:59:39.900 with the
00:59:40.900 Holocaust
00:59:41.240 narrative.
00:59:43.420 In other
00:59:43.780 words it's
00:59:44.960 going to be
00:59:45.320 tough for
00:59:46.120 Israel to
00:59:46.640 be the
00:59:47.440 special
00:59:48.620 country who
00:59:49.300 needs everybody's
00:59:50.320 special attention
00:59:51.080 because the
00:59:52.500 Holocaust once
00:59:53.340 happened.
00:59:55.240 You could say
00:59:56.180 more than once
00:59:56.880 because the
00:59:57.420 Jews have had
00:59:58.000 kind of a
00:59:58.780 tough history.
00:59:59.820 But if
01:00:02.120 Hamas can
01:00:03.280 succeed in
01:00:05.260 propagandizing
01:00:07.480 the rest of
01:00:08.060 the world
01:00:08.420 which is not
01:00:09.200 nearly as
01:00:09.800 pro-Israel as
01:00:10.720 you think they
01:00:11.180 might be
01:00:11.660 to believe that
01:00:13.860 the death
01:00:14.320 count in
01:00:14.840 Gaza is some
01:00:15.800 ridiculously high
01:00:17.440 number that
01:00:19.300 just completely
01:00:20.180 kneecaps the
01:00:22.140 strongest asset
01:00:22.980 in Israel
01:00:23.560 which is they
01:00:24.640 have this
01:00:25.040 historical
01:00:26.380 past that
01:00:28.880 in a way it
01:00:30.340 gives them a
01:00:30.760 superpower.
01:00:32.280 Because people
01:00:32.960 say well I
01:00:33.640 understand that
01:00:34.320 given your
01:00:35.860 history it makes
01:00:36.480 sense that you'd
01:00:37.140 be very
01:00:38.500 concerned about
01:00:39.160 security.
01:00:40.340 So
01:00:40.780 anyway
01:00:43.100 Hamas is very
01:00:44.740 close to
01:00:45.480 winning the
01:00:46.600 propaganda war
01:00:47.560 simply by
01:00:48.920 ratcheting up the
01:00:50.260 number of people
01:00:50.780 they claim died
01:00:51.640 whether that's
01:00:52.440 accurate or not.
01:00:53.220 so that's why
01:00:54.520 I'm not going to
01:00:54.940 give you their
01:00:55.320 number because
01:00:56.000 that would be
01:00:56.420 helping them
01:00:56.900 with their
01:00:57.200 propaganda.
01:00:59.660 All right
01:01:00.000 and I'll say
01:01:01.620 again the one
01:01:02.840 and only way I
01:01:03.660 can see this
01:01:04.320 going is that
01:01:06.460 Israel will
01:01:07.420 keep the West
01:01:08.680 Bank forever
01:01:09.320 they'll keep
01:01:09.900 Gaza forever
01:01:10.640 they'll keep it
01:01:11.980 under Israeli
01:01:14.320 control
01:01:14.940 probably with
01:01:16.880 some you
01:01:18.240 know Saudi
01:01:19.240 or Jordanian
01:01:20.320 or Palestinian
01:01:21.720 you know to
01:01:23.120 do the
01:01:23.540 picking up the
01:01:24.140 garbage and
01:01:24.640 the basic
01:01:25.020 stuff of
01:01:25.520 government
01:01:25.920 but obviously
01:01:27.140 Israel will
01:01:27.860 keep military
01:01:28.660 security control
01:01:29.760 there's no way
01:01:30.660 they're going to
01:01:31.020 give that up
01:01:31.600 and if they
01:01:33.140 get control
01:01:33.720 of the schools
01:01:34.640 it probably
01:01:35.780 takes them
01:01:36.280 one or two
01:01:36.760 generations to
01:01:37.680 brainwash the
01:01:38.520 kids to not
01:01:40.160 want to destroy
01:01:40.840 everything in
01:01:41.400 Israel every day
01:01:42.120 so I think
01:01:44.020 that's the plan
01:01:44.720 now that
01:01:46.220 would require
01:01:46.840 50 years
01:01:48.020 refugees or
01:01:48.880 whatever
01:01:49.280 of refugees
01:01:52.180 basically
01:01:53.380 so what do
01:01:55.060 you do with
01:01:55.420 the people
01:01:55.800 who are
01:01:57.020 displaced from
01:01:57.940 Gaza
01:01:58.300 I have no
01:01:59.820 idea
01:02:00.280 you know they
01:02:02.340 can't obviously
01:02:03.240 they can't kill
01:02:04.240 them all
01:02:04.720 they can't starve
01:02:05.860 them
01:02:06.160 they're not going
01:02:07.040 to go to other
01:02:07.580 countries but
01:02:08.580 they're not going
01:02:09.120 to go back to
01:02:09.700 Gaza and just
01:02:10.640 pick up where
01:02:11.700 they left off
01:02:12.420 and if they did
01:02:12.980 it would take
01:02:13.360 years
01:02:13.740 so what's
01:02:16.540 going to happen
01:02:17.000 I feel like
01:02:19.080 they're just
01:02:19.400 going to build
01:02:19.820 a new
01:02:20.180 civilization
01:02:20.860 in tents
01:02:22.160 and you
01:02:23.960 know the
01:02:24.280 level of the
01:02:25.700 tenting will
01:02:26.440 improve until
01:02:27.240 somebody builds
01:02:27.860 a building
01:02:28.280 and then it
01:02:29.440 will just
01:02:29.660 become its
01:02:30.120 own little
01:02:30.480 city
01:02:30.820 so I think
01:02:32.300 wherever they're
01:02:33.420 at at the
01:02:33.940 moment
01:02:34.300 probably in
01:02:35.480 some big
01:02:35.940 desert area
01:02:36.760 it's probably
01:02:38.180 where they'll
01:02:38.560 be forever
01:02:39.080 we're the
01:02:41.760 first Mars
01:02:42.820 colony
01:02:43.280 that we
01:02:44.340 call
01:02:44.620 Moscow
01:02:45.420 all right
01:02:46.700 that's a
01:02:49.900 tight hour
01:02:50.700 of live
01:02:51.840 streaming
01:02:52.120 I'm going
01:02:53.500 to leave
01:02:53.700 it there
01:02:54.000 go do
01:02:54.800 some things
01:02:55.360 I've got
01:02:58.020 special guests
01:02:59.560 coming in a
01:03:00.320 few hours
01:03:00.880 do you all
01:03:02.380 know Zuby
01:03:03.140 Zuby is
01:03:05.240 doing a
01:03:05.740 world tour
01:03:06.620 talking to
01:03:07.860 people all
01:03:08.920 over the
01:03:09.220 world
01:03:09.460 so he'll
01:03:10.140 be stopping
01:03:10.660 by
01:03:10.960 and he
01:03:13.140 will be
01:03:13.520 the first
01:03:14.820 in-person
01:03:16.980 interview
01:03:17.540 I've done
01:03:20.320 in three
01:03:20.680 years
01:03:21.100 have I done
01:03:22.060 any in-person
01:03:22.800 interviews since
01:03:23.620 the pandemic
01:03:24.380 I can't remember
01:03:26.300 any but he'll
01:03:27.220 be here in the
01:03:27.860 house and
01:03:28.960 that's why he
01:03:29.840 does better than
01:03:30.960 other people
01:03:31.440 because he goes
01:03:32.080 to you
01:03:32.440 and that's a
01:03:33.420 pretty strong
01:03:33.880 model
01:03:34.220 all right
01:03:35.680 yes but
01:03:38.300 that wasn't
01:03:38.640 an interview
01:03:39.080 per se
01:03:39.520 yeah
01:03:42.100 all right
01:03:43.220 ladies and
01:03:45.920 gentlemen I
01:03:46.380 will see you
01:03:47.000 tomorrow
01:03:47.900 thanks for
01:03:48.800 joining on
01:03:49.400 the platforms
01:03:50.720 of YouTube
01:03:51.500 and Rumble
01:03:52.100 and X
01:03:52.560 been good to
01:03:53.480 see you
01:03:53.860 catch me
01:03:54.800 tomorrow
01:03:55.120 you