Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 10, 2024


Episode 2380 CWSA 02⧸10⧸24


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 13 minutes

Words per minute

141.49883

Word count

10,447

Sentence count

786

Harmful content

Misogyny

15

sentences flagged

Hate speech

25

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Scott Adams talks about the weirdest thing that could happen in the future: super-old mutant wolves who could survive nuclear war. And a new Chinese medicine that could help you get rid of your hypertension problem.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba, la-da-da-da-da.
00:00:05.100 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:09.840 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:11.740 You've never had a better time.
00:00:13.660 And if you'd like to take it up a level that nobody can even understand with their tiny
00:00:17.840 human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tankard, tankard, chalice or
00:00:22.680 stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:27.460 I like coffee.
00:00:28.100 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes
00:00:32.940 everything better.
00:00:33.800 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.
00:00:37.780 Go.
00:00:41.800 Oh God, that's good.
00:00:45.100 So, so good.
00:00:48.320 Well, if you're not subscribed to the Dilbert comic, either on X, you can subscribe to it
00:00:55.220 there, or on the locals, locals, scottadams.locals.com, where you can see lots of other stuff, my other
00:01:04.460 comics, like Robots Free News, et cetera.
00:01:07.140 But you missed yesterday's Dilbert comic was, Wally was trying to expense his expenses when
00:01:15.480 he traveled to Elbonia for the AI brothel.
00:01:19.440 So, Wally tries to expense an AI brothel, only to be challenged by the boss.
00:01:25.720 And when Wally complains that his choice of his sexual preferences are being criticized, the
00:01:36.080 boss says, no, I just wanted to let you know that there's no such thing as an AI brothel
00:01:40.640 in Elbonia.
00:01:42.100 And Wally says that would explain the excess body hair.
00:01:47.660 So, if you're not subscribing to Dilbert, you're missing a lot, so much, just so much.
00:01:53.960 All right, let's talk about the news.
00:01:55.840 Apparently around Chernobyl, which I guess was 38 years ago, was a disaster at Chernobyl, some
00:02:03.440 of the wolves have evolved into mutant wolves who are resistant to cancer, at least cancer
00:02:11.440 that comes from radiation.
00:02:14.000 So, you didn't see that coming, did you?
00:02:16.500 That's right.
00:02:18.200 Super radioactive wolves could be our future. 0.78
00:02:22.720 Might be the only thing that survives a nuclear war.
00:02:26.460 But it does raise the question, what other powers do these wolves have?
00:02:33.440 For example, can they fly in a way that defies physics?
00:02:39.760 Because if they can, that would explain a lot about the UFOs.
00:02:43.580 It could be just flying Chernobyl wolves, mutant wolves.
00:02:48.700 I mean, you can't rule it out, is what I'm saying.
00:02:52.960 Or possibly, if they start building pyramids, that could be another hint about our history.
00:02:59.740 But keep an eye on the mutant Chernobyl wolves.
00:03:02.640 Could be a lot more interesting things.
00:03:05.560 Possibly, possibly a superhero.
00:03:09.640 Now, here's the question.
00:03:11.700 We know now that from the totally reliable press in this country, that Joe Biden's age is not
00:03:20.400 a defect.
00:03:21.700 Have you heard?
00:03:22.840 It is, to quote them, a superpower.
00:03:26.420 It's a superpower.
00:03:27.420 So it makes you wonder, if Joe Biden were to have a fight with a Chernobyl mutant wolf that
00:03:36.340 could survive radioactivity, who would win?
00:03:40.600 Would Joe win with his superpower of being super old?
00:03:43.940 Or would the wolf win with his mutant powers?
00:03:47.200 I don't know.
00:03:47.760 I'd like to see it anyway.
00:03:49.420 You can't say you wouldn't like to see it.
00:03:51.180 All right, pay-per-view.
00:03:56.840 Here's some science for you.
00:03:59.100 Do you believe science, everybody?
00:04:01.700 Science is reliable.
00:04:03.940 So let me tell you some science.
00:04:05.500 Over in China, they did a study, a single-bind study with 342 participants, and they found
00:04:15.200 that doing Tai Chi, the traditional Chinese practice that goes something like this, if
00:04:22.960 you're only listening on a podcast, you're missing all the good visual humor.
00:04:27.380 But apparently, the Tai Chi can definitely help your hypertension.
00:04:36.300 So they compared it to regular exercise, and they found out that the traditional Tai Chi
00:04:42.620 will lower your blood pressure.
00:04:46.000 Now, let us examine the credibility of the science.
00:04:50.100 Number one, the science comes out of China.
00:04:52.480 Number two, it involves a traditional Chinese practice.
00:04:58.280 So it comes from China, and they're trying to find out if a traditional Chinese practice
00:05:03.620 is good for you.
00:05:04.940 Oh, surprise!
00:05:06.560 Surprise!
00:05:07.860 The Chinese study that's a single-bind, which is not a double-blind, single-blind, so it's
00:05:14.440 not as good as a double-blind, and only had 342 participants, surprisingly supported the
00:05:22.200 national interests of China.
00:05:24.200 Huh.
00:05:25.280 Huh.
00:05:25.980 Yeah, not single-blind, not bind.
00:05:32.260 So is this credible science?
00:05:36.220 No.
00:05:36.700 Now, it doesn't mean Tai Chi doesn't lower your blood pressure.
00:05:41.360 Maybe it does.
00:05:42.580 But should you believe it, if it's a study of 342 people in China about a traditional Chinese
00:05:49.200 practice?
00:05:49.620 I don't know.
00:05:52.340 I've got a feeling if they studied traditional Chinese acupuncture, they might have gotten
00:05:57.600 a similar result, if you know what I mean.
00:06:01.900 All right.
00:06:03.680 You know what's a really good idea?
00:06:06.380 To do your own research.
00:06:09.920 Let me show you what happens when you do your own research.
00:06:13.680 Here, Dr. Eli David is showing us on the X platform.
00:06:18.440 He is posting about, there's a graphic showing that China is emitting more carbon than the
00:06:26.780 entire developed world combined.
00:06:30.100 So if you did your own research and you tried to find out who's the worst polluter, you'd find
00:06:37.720 out it was China.
00:06:38.500 So that tells you something useful, right?
00:06:42.680 Because you did your own research.
00:06:45.140 Yeah.
00:06:46.480 Now let's do it on a per capita basis.
00:06:50.080 China's got 1.43 billion people.
00:06:52.460 The United States has 342 million.
00:06:54.680 That means the U.S. is roughly 24% of their population, and yet the U.S. is emitting something
00:07:01.040 like 40% of their CO2.
00:07:04.660 Huh.
00:07:05.580 When you look at it that way, it's the reverse.
00:07:07.520 If you look at it on a per-person basis, the U.S. is much worse.
00:07:13.860 So what's the point?
00:07:17.340 Is China worse than the U.S., or is the U.S. worse than China? 0.85
00:07:22.660 Which way is the fair way to say it?
00:07:25.320 Well, some say China is a country and the U.S. is a country, so you just compare them.
00:07:29.980 They're doing worse things to the world than we are.
00:07:32.340 So they're bigger, big deal.
00:07:35.320 They're doing worse things to the world.
00:07:37.780 That is correct.
00:07:38.960 They are.
00:07:40.300 But you don't think it matters that they have more people?
00:07:44.460 Don't we naturally expect that the more people there are, the more CO2, if you live in any
00:07:50.400 kind of a modernizing society?
00:07:53.960 So if you did your own research and stopped at the raw number, did you do a good job of
00:08:01.340 doing your own research?
00:08:02.880 Or do you think it really matters, the per-person?
00:08:07.160 Because if you tried to figure out who's the good people, I would say it's the people who
00:08:11.960 have the smallest per-person CO2.
00:08:16.660 That's how I'd see it.
00:08:18.540 So why would you see it the other way?
00:08:21.340 Could you see it the other way?
00:08:22.300 You could.
00:08:23.120 You could see it the other way.
00:08:24.660 So that's my point.
00:08:25.460 Doing your own research will more often mislead you than illuminate you, and you don't know
00:08:33.100 the difference.
00:08:33.680 Sometimes doing your own research gets you exactly the right answer, might even save your life.
00:08:40.700 The trouble is, you don't know when that's happening, and when you're just being misled,
00:08:45.080 but you're pretty sure you're right this time.
00:08:46.500 I see in the comments that you want me to note that CO2 can feed plants such as Joe Biden
00:09:01.540 and vegetables.
00:09:04.080 I get it.
00:09:05.080 I see your joke.
00:09:06.740 I will steal your joke.
00:09:08.140 All right.
00:09:10.060 There's a Kentucky state senator who wants a constitutional amendment to ban non-citizens
00:09:16.560 from voting.
00:09:17.800 Can you believe this is even a question?
00:09:20.900 That we're seriously talking about not just letting, eh, let a few of those non-citizens 1.00
00:09:27.620 vote.
00:09:28.300 I mean, it's just going to get lost in the noise anyway.
00:09:30.480 But we have massive immigration, and we're going to let, it looks like there's a movement 0.99
00:09:37.160 in some states to let them vote.
00:09:39.440 Now, how is that even in the conversation?
00:09:43.980 Well, how about we do a little bit of embrace and amplify?
00:09:52.500 So the Democrats are telling us that our system would be better off if the illegal migrants 1.00
00:10:02.360 vote.
00:10:03.660 What do you think?
00:10:05.320 Do you think our system would be better off if non-citizens who enter the United States 1.00
00:10:11.120 illegally vote?
00:10:13.180 But suppose we take that and amplify it.
00:10:16.820 What if we embrace it for a moment and say, you know what?
00:10:19.360 Not only are you right about that, but you're so right we should do more of it.
00:10:24.940 Here's a little mental experiment for you, and this is going to really, this is going
00:10:29.720 to break your brain.
00:10:31.660 Suppose we let everybody vote in the whole world, literally everybody.
00:10:36.880 You're a Chinese citizen.
00:10:38.140 You want to vote in the next American election?
00:10:40.200 You can, and we'll count it.
00:10:42.520 You're in Lithuania?
00:10:44.040 Absolutely.
00:10:45.000 You can vote.
00:10:45.840 We'll send you an electronic, you know, ballot.
00:10:50.520 Anywhere in South America?
00:10:52.200 Absolutely, you'll vote.
00:10:53.500 Now, here's my question.
00:10:55.700 Which would be the better result?
00:10:58.320 If Americans, including, you know, with our, all of our division naturally, and then you 0.81
00:11:04.600 throw in the migrants, and we're going to get this real insider who wants power, which 1.00
00:11:10.800 group is, you know, funding the bad guys the best, who does the military-industrial complex
00:11:16.880 want, who's counting our votes, you know, all that stuff.
00:11:20.200 Now, compare that to the world that would include our adversaries.
00:11:26.880 Our adversaries.
00:11:28.700 Literally, our adversaries.
00:11:30.120 Let them vote in our election, along with our allies.
00:11:32.600 What would happen?
00:11:33.140 Well, I think you might be surprised, because even our adversaries don't want us to fail.
00:11:42.960 If America went down, everything would be screwed for a long time.
00:11:48.920 They don't want, you know, our adversaries don't want us to attack them.
00:11:52.660 I get that.
00:11:53.960 Our adversaries don't want us to, you know, take their resources and stuff like that.
00:11:57.660 That makes sense.
00:11:58.760 But I don't think they want us to fail.
00:12:00.780 I think what they want is us to be a legitimate player on the world stage, to do the thing
00:12:07.340 that America does, you know, invent new technologies and create medicines that aren't always a scam.
00:12:13.560 That sort of thing.
00:12:14.780 You know, get to space, you know, create some Elon Musks now and then.
00:12:20.100 You know, they like that stuff.
00:12:21.500 I propose to you that, I don't, this is not a serious suggestion, by the way, but if we let
00:12:31.400 every other country vote for America's president, that we would vastly improve our choices.
00:12:39.320 Just look at it.
00:12:40.740 Look at what we're, look at the two choices we gave ourselves with our current system.
00:12:44.980 Do you think the rest of the world would have put up with that?
00:12:49.260 Do you think that Biden would actually be in the race if the rest of the world got to choose
00:12:55.320 our president?
00:12:56.380 No, no.
00:12:58.260 It's possible that none of the people who were in the race would be in it.
00:13:01.840 They'd probably pick somebody who was just a good, you know, a good operator who wasn't
00:13:07.000 too political, who just did stuff that made sense.
00:13:09.960 Yeah, yeah, they'd probably vote for somebody, well, Elon can't run, but they'd probably
00:13:16.180 vote for, well, I don't know about Vivek, he's, you know, he certainly is aligned with
00:13:20.600 one political party, but they'd probably pick somebody who wasn't too political, who just
00:13:25.240 knew how to get stuff done.
00:13:26.720 So we'd stay, yeah, maybe a Ron DeSantis.
00:13:29.800 That's not, that's not too far.
00:13:31.540 Somebody in the middle, middle-ish.
00:13:34.620 Anyway, our current system is so broken that letting the rest of the world vote, I believe,
00:13:39.960 in all seriousness, it's not a serious suggestion, but as a mental exercise, I think the world
00:13:46.220 would vote us a better president.
00:13:48.780 Because look what we're doing.
00:13:50.860 I mean, really.
00:13:52.500 Look what we're doing.
00:13:54.060 There's no way it would be worse.
00:13:58.540 All right, I'm going to take a minor partial victory lap.
00:14:02.560 You might know the actor and activist Michael Rapoport, he's been making some news, he was
00:14:10.280 on, Tim Poole's show was talking about him and others.
00:14:14.380 He was on, oh, I can't, why can't I remember his initials?
00:14:20.200 D, B, E?
00:14:21.880 P, B, D.
00:14:22.820 P, B, D.
00:14:23.240 I'll never be able to remember his initials.
00:14:26.520 I don't know why.
00:14:27.580 Oh, it's because the P and the B and the D. 0.94
00:14:30.300 Oh, I got it.
00:14:31.420 I'm dyslexic.
00:14:33.620 Look at the letters, the lowercase letter P, B, and D, lowercase.
00:14:41.540 They're all the same letter.
00:14:43.980 P, B, and D are all the same letter.
00:14:46.340 They're just upside down and backwards.
00:14:48.780 You see that?
00:14:49.440 I just realized why I could never get his name.
00:14:53.500 If I remembered his full name, it'd be easier.
00:14:55.760 No, but P, B, and D, in lowercase, are all the same letter.
00:14:59.800 I actually can't see it.
00:15:01.700 They all just jump around when I look at them.
00:15:04.540 I never realized that before, but I think that's the problem.
00:15:08.000 Oh, that and the fact that my brain is corroding faster than Biden's.
00:15:11.740 Anyway, Michael Rapoport is coming out and saying that he was initially fooled by the
00:15:16.520 fine people hoax, and he actually believed that Trump had said those neo-Nazis were fine
00:15:21.800 people, and now he's going public and saying he knows that that was taken out of context,
00:15:26.420 and we see the full quote.
00:15:28.060 It's obvious he said the opposite of that.
00:15:30.180 And here's what's amazing about it.
00:15:35.620 The fine people hoax, in my opinion, was the second biggest political hoax of my time.
00:15:42.000 The second biggest.
00:15:43.220 The Russian collusion was bigger.
00:15:45.180 But it was the second biggest political hoax, and it is now being treated, at least on the
00:15:51.700 right-leaning side of the world, is being treated as simply a fact that it was a hoax.
00:15:56.800 When you watch the Tim Pool show, there's nobody on the other side saying, oh, but he did say
00:16:03.900 it.
00:16:04.860 We're actually past that.
00:16:06.660 There's nobody arguing he actually said it, unless you have actually just batshit crazy
00:16:12.340 Democrats.
00:16:14.020 So, I'd like to give...
00:16:15.540 Now, I do think that this hoax is an evergreen.
00:16:18.480 If you wait two years, it'll just revive itself, and somebody will believe it happened again.
00:16:22.680 But at the moment, it's beaten down better than I've seen it beaten down.
00:16:26.900 So, big shout-out to Steve Cortez, who's been working against that hoax for years now, and
00:16:34.140 Joel Pollack, also, and Breitbart, especially, in tweeting and posting.
00:16:40.520 And then I, of course, have been a maniac about it.
00:16:44.100 So, I would say that the three horsemen of the debunking of that hoax, we may have made
00:16:51.460 a difference.
00:16:54.100 By the way, let me ask you, do you think it would be commonly understood that it was a
00:16:59.440 hoax, even on the right, do you think it would be commonly understood without debate if the
00:17:05.460 three of us had not been pushing on it for seven years?
00:17:07.940 I think it made a difference.
00:17:12.160 Yeah.
00:17:12.780 Like, I never know what makes a difference, but seven years of just maniacally pushing
00:17:18.020 back on that thing, at least speaking for myself, I think it made some difference, but only on the
00:17:24.600 right.
00:17:25.860 People on the left don't get real news, so they have no idea.
00:17:29.320 All right, so, no surprise here, but the Democrats are pulling out some lawfare against
00:17:37.420 RFK Jr., and it looks like they're accusing him of illegal activities, I don't know, something
00:17:44.420 about a super PAC, it's probably bullshit, and now they've opened a federal investigation
00:17:49.780 to remove him from the ballot.
00:17:54.820 Oh, come on. 0.87
00:17:56.420 Man, how did the Democrats not see what's happening now?
00:18:02.720 How could you not see what's going on?
00:18:06.300 They don't get the news.
00:18:07.940 If they saw the same news as we do, maybe they'd see the same thing.
00:18:11.960 But, yeah, that's disgusting.
00:18:16.180 And you know what's funny about it is that, and I'll give RFK Jr. some credit, if you look
00:18:22.460 at RFK Jr.'s character and his life of work.
00:18:27.520 Now, that doesn't mean everything he's ever said about vaccinations is true, because I doubt
00:18:32.340 it.
00:18:32.960 You know, it's very unusual everybody would be true about, you know, that domain.
00:18:39.140 But I swear I never really suspect him of intentionally lying.
00:18:44.440 I just don't see it.
00:18:47.880 I mean, he's been talking about a lot of things for a long time, and I'm looking for the lies.
00:18:53.540 Now, there might be things he's incorrect about.
00:18:56.600 Not going to argue that at all.
00:18:59.300 But if you compare the Biden administration to RFK Jr., I don't even need to look at the
00:19:07.500 details of this story.
00:19:10.800 Is everybody having the same impression?
00:19:12.620 I'm just going to take his word for it that it's illegitimate, because I think he earned
00:19:17.020 that.
00:19:18.660 Does anybody disagree?
00:19:20.640 I think that the Democrats and Biden, his credibility is so low, and RFK Jr.'s is so high,
00:19:29.320 not in terms of being technically correct about everything he's ever said, but just not lying.
00:19:34.260 I believe that if he says there was no crime, and he says they're coming after him for political
00:19:39.060 reasons, I believe that.
00:19:41.040 And I don't even need to hear anything else, because that's the difference in credibility.
00:19:46.200 One is very high credibility, and the other is a known serial liar for 150 years.
00:19:53.960 So those are not really similar.
00:19:55.440 Senator Rand Paul is responding to Joe Biden, who said that it's, quote, close to criminal
00:20:07.120 neglect if Congress doesn't send money to Ukraine.
00:20:12.620 Close to criminal neglect if we don't fund Ukraine's border war.
00:20:18.560 And Rand Paul, Senator Rand Paul reminds us, I would say it's criminal neglect for Mitch McConnell, Chuck
00:20:25.820 Sumer, and Joe Biden to get together to send $100 billion overseas to fix someone else's border
00:20:31.300 before addressing our border.
00:20:34.540 Yeah, that does seem criminal.
00:20:38.300 And actually, Trump said something like that in a speech in Harrisburg, I guess.
00:20:42.840 That he thinks that the people who are not closing the border, that maybe there should be some
00:20:51.800 criminal liability.
00:20:53.840 Now, I don't think so.
00:20:55.780 I doubt there's any criminal liability, and I'm not really big on looking for crimes where
00:21:01.260 they're not obvious.
00:21:02.840 But it does seem that important.
00:21:06.340 It does seem like it's on that level of a gigantic crime, even if it's not technically a crime,
00:21:14.220 if it's just people not doing their job or something.
00:21:17.020 So it's that important.
00:21:18.640 I doubt it's an actual crime.
00:21:21.340 Are you having fun watching Biden supporters trying to explain away all of his mental problems?
00:21:32.320 Does anybody else think it's hilarious at this point?
00:21:34.440 But, you know, I always used to make fun of the old thing in politics.
00:21:39.900 There's always somebody saying, oh, the emperor has no clothes.
00:21:44.180 The emperor has no clothes.
00:21:46.060 And I always go, ugh, ugh.
00:21:49.700 It's like Soylent Greed.
00:21:51.580 It's like the obvious thing everybody says in every situation.
00:21:55.880 The emperor has no clothes.
00:21:58.020 But I've never seen it fit so well.
00:22:00.200 Yet you've got, obviously, a bumbling moron who's clearly mentally, you know, disintegrated.
00:22:10.780 And they're trying to sell us on the fact that he's all there.
00:22:14.160 This is the first time I've seen an exact perfect example of the emperor's new clothes.
00:22:21.840 Because I always thought, well, if you had an emperor who literally wore no clothes,
00:22:27.400 there's no way that you wouldn't mention it.
00:22:31.620 Like, it's not realistic.
00:22:32.740 But we actually have a situation where everybody can see he's mentally degraded.
00:22:39.820 And his supporters are looking you right in the eyes and saying, no, he's not.
00:22:45.960 No.
00:22:47.760 No.
00:22:48.760 He's wearing all of his clothes.
00:22:51.740 And he's not mentally degraded.
00:22:54.600 Now, do you see me doing the Democrat lying strategy?
00:22:58.400 There are three things to look for.
00:23:02.280 You look for the eyes get wide.
00:23:06.300 You look for the chin goes up a little bit.
00:23:09.660 And you look for the smile that doesn't match the face.
00:23:14.420 Do you want to see it again?
00:23:17.840 I give you Kamala Harris defending Joe Biden.
00:23:25.420 I'm going to play it with a sound off.
00:23:28.400 I want you to see if you can spot the point where she tells the lie.
00:23:32.980 And the lie is that Joe Biden is fine.
00:23:35.200 There's nothing problem, right?
00:23:36.720 So watch your face until the moment she gets through the lie.
00:23:39.860 Look for the eyes widen.
00:23:41.940 Chin goes up.
00:23:43.600 And the smile that doesn't match the face.
00:23:46.220 Watch for it.
00:23:49.840 And I want you to indicate when you see the lie.
00:23:53.420 There's no sound.
00:23:54.320 I want you to see if I can get it so you can both see it at the same time.
00:24:02.980 Watch for the eyes to get big in a minute.
00:24:04.600 I hope I didn't miss it.
00:24:13.280 Did I miss it yet?
00:24:15.820 Oh, I think I missed it.
00:24:19.640 Let's do it again.
00:24:22.220 All right.
00:24:22.640 Eyes normal.
00:24:24.620 Head normal.
00:24:26.820 Eyes and face match.
00:24:29.400 There it is.
00:24:30.120 There it is.
00:24:30.520 Did you catch it?
00:24:35.040 See if I can fast forward it.
00:24:41.160 It's hard to catch the moment.
00:24:42.980 But did you catch it?
00:24:44.920 You play it back yourself and catch it.
00:24:47.580 Yeah.
00:24:49.300 But it's funny.
00:24:50.080 Once you see it, it's so obvious it just jumps right out.
00:24:52.540 But so here are the defenses that are the people giving.
00:24:57.260 One is that Trump confuses names, too.
00:25:01.520 Trump confuses names, too.
00:25:04.400 And then they show some video of him.
00:25:06.780 Now, is that fair?
00:25:08.660 Is that fair to say Trump confuses names, too?
00:25:12.360 I think it is.
00:25:13.940 Yeah, I think it's fair.
00:25:14.880 Because in my opinion, when Biden confuses names, in his case, it probably is because
00:25:22.700 of dementia.
00:25:23.680 But it's also true that people confuse names routinely.
00:25:27.360 It's a very normal thing to do.
00:25:29.620 All right.
00:25:30.020 Now, in fact, this is a sort of a confession of mine.
00:25:33.940 I've always fantasized, like, what would it be like to be president?
00:25:37.940 And I thought, I wonder, could I ever be a president?
00:25:41.300 And I realized that I probably couldn't because of all the names of foreign leaders I would
00:25:45.960 get wrong.
00:25:47.400 I mean, I have a real problem with it.
00:25:50.320 Let me give you an example.
00:25:53.320 If I were being visited by, let's say, the leader of Afghanistan, I'm not sure I would 0.99
00:25:59.360 know that Hibatullah Akhazanda, I wouldn't know him from Bahrain's Sheikh Hamad bin Asal
00:26:08.060 Khalifa.
00:26:08.640 I mean, I wouldn't even know the difference at all.
00:26:15.400 So, yeah.
00:26:17.320 Yeah, I'd be all, which one is that?
00:26:20.080 Is that Hibatullah Akhazanda?
00:26:22.940 Or is that Hamad bin Asal Khalai?
00:26:27.000 I can't even tell them apart.
00:26:29.680 You know, so that's one of the reasons I can't be president, because I can't tell all the leaders
00:26:33.360 apart.
00:26:33.740 I used to think, but apparently not being able to tell the leaders apart will not hurt
00:26:40.320 you for being president.
00:26:42.160 So we got a Biden, we got a Trump.
00:26:44.720 Apparently that's not.
00:26:45.800 Now, the other thing that I thought would prevent me from someday being president is all of my
00:26:50.420 pussy grabbing. 0.97
00:26:51.300 But now I have evidence to suggest that I could grab a bunch of pussy, confuse the names of 1.00
00:26:59.980 Hibatullah Akhazanda and Ibn Asal Khalifa, and I'd still be able to be a president.
00:27:07.300 And that's, I find that motivating.
00:27:08.740 So here are some other things that people are saying to defend Biden.
00:27:16.060 Sticks and Hammer was funny.
00:27:18.180 He posted today, show me a video, a recent video of Joe Biden stuttering, because they're
00:27:25.260 saying, don't make fun of him for his stuttering.
00:27:28.580 I mean, but do we have any video of him, let's say, from 10 years ago when he was perfectly
00:27:34.940 fine?
00:27:35.420 Was he stuttering 10 years ago?
00:27:38.460 I don't remember it.
00:27:40.860 I have no memory of him ever stuttering 10 years ago.
00:27:44.380 But now suddenly he stutters like he did when he was a kid.
00:27:47.340 Huh.
00:27:48.200 And then Rachel Maddow points out that he rides a bike.
00:27:53.740 Yeah.
00:27:55.200 She says he rides a bike.
00:27:59.240 Now, are we at the point where there's literally no difference between?
00:28:05.420 In reality and parody.
00:28:07.740 If I had told you that a comedian had told you that Joe Biden is perfectly fine because,
00:28:16.000 hey, look at how he rides a bike, wouldn't you think that that real comedian said that
00:28:21.600 as a joke?
00:28:22.160 But that's actually what Rachel Maddow said in the real world, in the actual real world,
00:28:29.740 outside of humor.
00:28:31.540 She said that he's probably fine because he can ride a bike.
00:28:35.760 Apparently he can ride it right into the ground.
00:28:39.480 She didn't say where he rides it to.
00:28:43.080 He rides it right to the ground.
00:28:44.600 But at least he's riding it.
00:28:47.180 And then there's the argument that Kamala makes that Joe Biden is actually totally mentally
00:28:55.500 capable, which certainly raises an interesting question, doesn't it?
00:29:00.980 Which others have raised.
00:29:03.220 Wait a minute.
00:29:03.800 If the reason he's not being prosecuted seems to be largely around his mental incapacity,
00:29:11.760 if you're arguing that he does have good mental capacity, aren't you also arguing he should
00:29:18.860 be in jail?
00:29:19.880 Now you're going to say to me, wait a minute.
00:29:25.900 Wait a minute.
00:29:29.180 You're going to say there's a complete difference between what Trump did and what Biden did,
00:29:35.440 because Biden simply said that he couldn't remember and he's incapable and he didn't willfully
00:29:43.380 do anything with those documents.
00:29:44.920 But they believe that Trump is mentally capable and he also resisted giving those documents
00:29:50.880 back.
00:29:51.920 So therefore, it's his resistance that's the real crime.
00:29:56.260 Are you hearing the Democrats say that?
00:30:01.300 Well, here's the funny part.
00:30:06.300 Do you know what they could say that would be terribly persuasive, but they can't form sentences
00:30:12.460 and get the sound of their mouth?
00:30:13.780 Like, literally, they can't say it, but it would be so persuasive if they could.
00:30:20.020 Here's what they can't say because of TDS.
00:30:26.200 If Trump had not resisted, we think that he should not be charged with anything regarding
00:30:33.360 the possession of the documents.
00:30:36.640 Now, if they said that, I would say, oh, well, that's very consistent.
00:30:41.140 Yeah, Biden wasn't charged because, because not just because he's mentally incapable, but
00:30:50.740 because he didn't resist when they asked him back and he accepted the process, which apparently
00:30:56.000 is not that unusual to have a process to get back documents from an official.
00:31:00.920 Whereas, whereas Trump, he resisted.
00:31:06.880 But here's the better way to say it.
00:31:09.780 If you really wanted to persuade me, you'd say, you know what?
00:31:12.840 If you're a Democrat, you'd say, yes, Biden did not get charged because he obeyed the system.
00:31:18.740 We also believe that if Trump had obeyed the system the same way, we also think he should not be charged the same way.
00:31:29.400 Do you know why they can't say that?
00:31:32.800 TDS.
00:31:33.920 It would be perfectly persuasive.
00:31:35.680 If you said that to me, I'd say, you know what?
00:31:39.260 That's actually a solid argument that one resisted and one didn't.
00:31:44.440 So maybe it is a resistance that's the problem.
00:31:47.540 But they've got to say it directly.
00:31:49.700 If Trump had not resisted, he should also not be charged for having the documents.
00:31:57.280 But you know why they can't say that?
00:31:59.000 The reason they can't say that is it would give imaginary mental cover to Trump.
00:32:09.200 Imaginary.
00:32:10.280 Because in the real world, he did resist.
00:32:13.620 Everybody agrees he resisted.
00:32:16.000 So they can't even do a hypothetical mental experiment which allowed Trump to go free in their minds.
00:32:24.660 And I mean this.
00:32:25.320 I mean they can't say the persuasive thing because in doing so, they would have to imagine Trump innocent of something.
00:32:34.140 And they actually can't go there.
00:32:36.600 Literally can't go there because their brains won't allow it.
00:32:40.140 So instead, they're closed off from their best argument for Biden, which is, you know what?
00:32:46.400 If Trump had given all the documents back, I don't think the possession of the documents should have been charged.
00:32:51.940 And you remember they made such a big deal about the contents of Trump's documents?
00:33:01.280 Do you remember that?
00:33:02.300 It was all about the contents.
00:33:04.860 And that they must have the nuclear secrets in there.
00:33:08.760 And then when Biden's documents were discovered, do you recall anybody characterizing the contents?
00:33:15.440 I don't recall that ever being done.
00:33:19.600 So we suddenly don't care about the contents.
00:33:23.020 After months and months of the Democrats saying, the contents are probably, well, we don't know, but I'm just speculating that it's Iranian nuclear secrets.
00:33:34.180 The dumbest speculation you could ever have.
00:33:36.620 Like, I don't think, do you think that a staffer or even Trump himself packed up some sensitive nuclear secrets and just took them with him?
00:33:48.020 I mean, I suppose anything's possible.
00:33:50.760 But that seems unlikely.
00:33:53.340 To me, it seems that both Biden and Trump probably had documents that were technically, you know, inappropriate to take home.
00:34:01.620 But maybe not that dangerous, like in the final analysis, probably not too dangerous.
00:34:07.460 So suddenly we just stopped talking about the contents.
00:34:11.600 We just stopped talking about it.
00:34:13.480 And that's why it's embarrassing if you're a Democrat.
00:34:16.420 If you made a big deal about the contents being the important part, now you lost that argument.
00:34:25.160 So is Biden fit to stand trial, in which case he should, or is he unfit?
00:34:31.620 So, let's talk about Tucker and Putin.
00:34:36.520 Remember, you mostly disagreed with me when I said that Putin's history lesson about why Russia thinks it should have some control over parts of Ukraine or all of it.
00:34:49.440 I said that he looked unhinged and it didn't look very capable to me.
00:34:55.280 Because the history lesson is not persuasive to Americans.
00:35:01.040 I'm going to revise that.
00:35:04.040 All right?
00:35:05.000 I'm going to completely reverse it, actually.
00:35:06.940 But not for the reason you think.
00:35:08.740 I still say that the history lesson had no value to Americans.
00:35:12.180 In other words, the details of his history lesson had zero persuasive effect on any American, probably any European.
00:35:20.700 But I'm not going to say it had no value.
00:35:26.500 And I'm going to fool you here because you don't see this coming.
00:35:29.540 Just wait for it.
00:35:32.180 But I saw that Tucker also regarded the history lesson as incoherent.
00:35:37.380 He actually used that word.
00:35:38.480 So, Tucker agreed with me that the history part just didn't seem connected, really, to the answer in a tight enough way that it looked like he was coherent.
00:35:51.400 Now, but wait for the end.
00:35:54.840 I'm going to support Putin's play. 0.77
00:35:58.500 So, don't criticize me yet.
00:36:01.120 I'm going to support Putin's play on the history lesson, but not for the reason you think.
00:36:05.500 Right?
00:36:05.740 Different reason.
00:36:06.380 So, and then I saw some people think that Putin was personally hurt by being rebuffed by the West, you know, every time he wanted to be friends.
00:36:20.020 I don't know if any of that's true.
00:36:21.300 We can't read his mind.
00:36:22.800 So, I wouldn't go there.
00:36:24.800 But maybe.
00:36:26.800 Maybe he's personally hurt.
00:36:28.720 I don't know if that affected anything.
00:36:32.540 But here's my defense of Putin.
00:36:36.380 It took me a while to figure this out.
00:36:40.840 Because the thing I was having trouble reconciling is that Putin is so capable and would know so much about persuasion, especially, you know, given his background,
00:36:51.760 that to do something that is so wrong persuasion-wise, it made me question his sanity until I realized what the real play was.
00:37:04.660 And now I don't question his sanity.
00:37:06.460 It was a really good play.
00:37:09.800 You don't realize why, but I'm going to tell you.
00:37:16.260 Those of you who are my long-time listeners can confirm that this is something I've talked about before, and actually in some detail.
00:37:24.300 And I've said I've used the technique myself.
00:37:26.400 Let's say you're negotiating with somebody, and it's just a business negotiation, and you want a good price, and they want to get a good price, and it's just business.
00:37:37.920 If it's just business, you almost know before you start where it's going to end up, don't you?
00:37:45.500 Like even before you start, you're going to ask for something too much, I'm going to say too little, we're going to meet in the middle, and in the end, it's going to look like similar business deals.
00:37:56.200 Because everybody in business knows that if you started with a first offer that was so far out of the normal business realm, nobody would even negotiate with you.
00:38:07.100 So you start by saying, what do we assume is possible?
00:38:11.220 And then you're within that realm, and you can always get to a meeting of minds if it's just financial.
00:38:18.840 You can almost always make it work.
00:38:20.400 Now, what would be an argument in which that doesn't work, where you're just both being rational, and you're both being within the rational domain, it's when something's irrational.
00:38:35.140 This is an actual persuasion negotiating technique, which I have used, and it goes like this.
00:38:41.860 If you can convince the other side that your reasoning is irrational, at least in any individual point of it, not the whole thing.
00:38:52.140 If you're just totally irrational, they won't deal with you.
00:38:54.580 But if you can say, I'm rational about everything, but honestly, I'm going to point out this one thing, and I'm going to tell you as directly as I can, I'm not going to be rational about this, and here's why.
00:39:07.120 If you can make that case, you almost win the negotiation from that point on.
00:39:16.160 You have to sell your own irrationality.
00:39:21.120 That sounds backwards, doesn't it?
00:39:23.360 That if you're negotiating with somebody, you have to convince them that you are irrational?
00:39:28.020 Doesn't that sound crazy?
00:39:30.800 Nope.
00:39:31.640 It's what Trump does all the time.
00:39:33.160 Do you think that when Trump said I might nuke Moscow, do you think that sounded rational? 0.98
00:39:43.880 Nope.
00:39:45.000 It didn't sound rational.
00:39:47.200 So Putin couldn't be sure that that was something he could negotiate, because it wasn't based on something rational.
00:39:54.720 Who the hell would nuke Moscow?
00:39:57.420 It would literally be crazy.
00:40:00.320 So how do you even deal with that?
00:40:01.680 What do you do with that?
00:40:04.020 Well, the first thing you do is you say, all right, I can't deal with crazy, so I'm going to have to work with whatever I can work with, but I know I can't change crazy.
00:40:13.400 And then Trump won.
00:40:16.580 Because you can't deal with crazy.
00:40:18.860 You can't negotiate with an irrational component.
00:40:23.240 It doesn't mean the person is rational in general, but there might be an irrational component.
00:40:27.460 Let me give you an example.
00:40:29.560 For my real life.
00:40:30.720 When my syndication contract, which was originally a 15-year deal, expired, I thought to myself, hey, I'm a free agent.
00:40:38.900 I'll go negotiate a better deal than I ever had, because I can negotiate with other syndication companies.
00:40:45.520 The syndicator is who sells it to newspapers, and you split the money.
00:40:48.760 So I thought that I would do that.
00:40:51.720 But then my syndication company reminded me, hey, there was a clause in your original contract that says, even at the end of it, if you go work with somebody else, we still get a portion of your money.
00:41:04.740 And I said, what?
00:41:08.640 Yeah, after 15 years, your new work, we would still get paid for, even if we have nothing to do with you, if you've gone to another company.
00:41:19.180 It says that right in your contract.
00:41:21.380 And I said, it couldn't possibly say that.
00:41:23.400 There's no way I would have signed that contract.
00:41:27.140 And then I looked at the contract.
00:41:29.340 It was there.
00:41:31.460 Just like they said.
00:41:33.140 And I don't know why did I forget it.
00:41:36.220 Like, I actually don't know why I didn't know it was there.
00:41:38.740 So here's what I could do.
00:41:41.460 I could either take a big loss and go with the same company that I went with for 15 years, which had been a really good relationship.
00:41:51.720 But I would leave a lot of money on the table if I couldn't go to the free market and negotiate my actual value.
00:41:59.220 So you know how I negotiated out of that clause?
00:42:04.820 Irrationally.
00:42:07.340 Intentionally, irrationally.
00:42:08.740 I looked the head of the syndicate in the eyes over lunch, and I said, basically in these words,
00:42:16.540 your contract is very clear.
00:42:19.480 I will quit the business before I'll sign it.
00:42:25.360 Now, I was at the height of my powers, and quitting at that point would have been absolutely stupid.
00:42:31.420 And I looked them in the eyes, and I said, this is so fucked up that I'll quit the business before I will agree with this.
00:42:38.060 Now, if he believed I would not quit the business, which would have been the more rational thing to do, obviously,
00:42:45.560 because all I had to do was sign up with them again, and they would just start throwing money at me like they did before, and everything would be fine.
00:42:52.340 So the most rational thing to do was say, oh, damn, I made a mistake, but I did, and my life would go on, and I'd still make a lot of money, they'd be happy, etc.
00:43:03.460 That would have been the rational thing to do.
00:43:05.760 So to get out of that, I went fully irrational.
00:43:09.100 And I had to sell that I would fuck myself up and down, backwards and forwards.
00:43:14.860 I would kill my family.
00:43:16.580 I would break a law.
00:43:18.000 But I wasn't going to sign that contract.
00:43:22.140 In the end, they were convinced that there was nothing they could do to get me to sign it.
00:43:28.860 And then I reached a very good deal, and I ended up, I did sign it with them, but not until they gave me a much better situation.
00:43:36.700 And in the end, I ended up going to another syndicate from, you know, just a business combination that happened later.
00:43:45.080 Now, let's go back to Biden.
00:43:47.780 So you see the idea, right?
00:43:50.220 And the irrational negotiating position is actually your strongest one, so long as you seem to be rational in general.
00:43:59.720 Putin seems to be irrational in general.
00:44:01.820 And then he gave you that long, weird, incoherent history lesson.
00:44:08.900 What was the only thing he needed you to know?
00:44:13.100 Do you remember the dates and the names and who?
00:44:16.240 No.
00:44:17.200 Nope.
00:44:18.380 Does he need you to remember the history?
00:44:21.120 Nope.
00:44:22.080 Nope.
00:44:22.660 Does he need you to think that the history is a valid reason for whatever he's doing?
00:44:28.380 Nope.
00:44:29.340 He doesn't need you.
00:44:30.020 Does he need you to believe that the history is accurate?
00:44:33.580 No.
00:44:34.580 Nope.
00:44:35.620 Doesn't need that.
00:44:36.660 Does he need you to agree with him about the history?
00:44:40.880 Nope.
00:44:41.940 Nope.
00:44:43.140 He only needs one thing, and he got it.
00:44:48.120 He only needed one thing to win the negotiations that are upcoming, because he knows they're upcoming, and he got it.
00:44:55.940 And the one thing he needed, and the one thing he needed was for the West to believe that he would burn down Europe before he would give up on this.
00:45:07.700 And he did.
00:45:09.240 He sold it.
00:45:11.400 He sold that.
00:45:13.320 Now, he didn't say it in those words, but he sure sold it. 0.96
00:45:17.860 He sold that the Russian heart is what has to be satisfied.
00:45:26.460 We can't do that.
00:45:28.520 We have no tools for that.
00:45:30.720 We can't rebuild you a pipeline.
00:45:33.560 Hey, we'll put your pipeline back together.
00:45:35.560 No.
00:45:36.280 That doesn't help my heart.
00:45:38.120 Not even a little bit.
00:45:39.940 Well, we'll negotiate.
00:45:41.340 You keep this.
00:45:42.280 We'll keep...
00:45:42.860 That doesn't help my heart.
00:45:46.480 What are you going to do?
00:45:49.540 He may have, Putin, successfully established that there's part of the negotiations that are off...
00:45:56.420 They're just off the table.
00:45:58.520 By simply telling us we're not going to be rational about this in a way that you and I would think would be rational.
00:46:05.560 But, in fact, he's hyper-rational.
00:46:09.080 It was kind of brilliant.
00:46:13.480 The fact that he used...
00:46:15.260 And I'm going to say used, because, you know, Tucker was using Putin, but Putin was using Tucker.
00:46:20.820 As long as it's transparent, I don't mind it a bit, actually.
00:46:24.360 You know, that was transparent.
00:46:25.880 It was right in front of us.
00:46:27.320 Like, the entire intention of it was to show you all of it.
00:46:31.520 How could I be mad at that?
00:46:34.060 Transparency is the best we can do, folks.
00:46:35.860 If you have full transparency, you could wish it were better, but it can't be better.
00:46:43.720 That's just the best you can do.
00:46:45.800 And that was full transparency.
00:46:47.660 Am I such an idiot that I think Putin told me the truth?
00:46:52.620 No.
00:46:53.980 No, I don't think Putin told me the truth.
00:46:56.920 Not even a little bit.
00:46:58.360 Do I think that Tucker asked every hard question that he wanted to ask?
00:47:04.800 No.
00:47:05.940 No.
00:47:07.000 Because he still had to survive.
00:47:11.320 So my take on this is that Putin won the interaction in the sense that he established an irrational point of negotiations that will help him in the future.
00:47:24.380 And at some point, the West will back down because he sold it so well.
00:47:31.700 The whole incoherent part, the whole fact that he made you listen to it first before he didn't ask the question,
00:47:38.780 that the way he handled the whole thing is all supportive of the fact that he has an irrational connection to it.
00:47:47.460 And that was the sale.
00:47:49.340 And we all bought it.
00:47:51.380 Nicely done, Putin.
00:47:53.200 Nicely done.
00:47:53.880 Now, it is possible he's just a crazy, babbling old guy talking about history.
00:47:58.700 That's not impossible.
00:48:00.440 But given that everything else he does seems to make sense, it would be weird if this is the one thing that was completely, you know, accidental.
00:48:10.840 So I do believe that his belief about history is probably, you know, it's real.
00:48:19.380 I think he's motivated by it.
00:48:21.180 But far more important than his motivation is that he sold the fact that he's not going to be dealing with that like rational things.
00:48:28.580 Very well done as a negotiator.
00:48:31.320 Now, let's talk about the opposite.
00:48:35.200 So one of the things that came out of that interview with Tucker and Putin was the claim that there was some movement toward a negotiated peace that Boris Johnson killed and talked Zelensky out of it.
00:48:49.660 Boris Johnson is very angry at that interview.
00:48:53.400 And among the things he says are that Tucker was a, quote, fawning, guffawing, and had a slack-jawed happiness at having a scoop.
00:49:06.420 And Johnson says that Tucker betrayed his viewers around the world, said he didn't ask tough questions, didn't ask Putin why even now he is using the most brutal means of modern warfare to maim and murder innocent Ukrainian civilians.
00:49:24.160 And then he said, Carlson acted like a fan of Putin and, quote, boneheadedly accepted Putin's mixture of semi-masticated Wikipedia and outright falsehoods, Johnson said.
00:49:38.160 And he went on, he said, not since George Galloway, I have no idea who that is, but not since George Galloway went to Baghdad and hailed the indefatigability, indefatigability, god damn you, Johnson, can you use words that are a little bit smaller than this?
00:49:57.640 I know you're showing off, but I don't need to take four runs at this one god damn word.
00:50:04.420 Indefatigability, indefatigability.
00:50:06.160 Indefatigability, indefatigability of Saddam Hussein.
00:50:13.000 Have we seen such a display of, this is actually something Johnson said, of bum-sucking servility to a tyrant?
00:50:21.440 And said Carlson was just the medium, the sewer, the hose for Putin to spread his message to America.
00:50:31.000 So was that good persuasion?
00:50:33.340 How did Boris Johnson do defending himself against the accusations?
00:50:42.420 Did you hear the part where he said the accusations are not true?
00:50:48.720 He left that part out.
00:50:51.560 He left out the part about the accusations are not true.
00:50:55.320 Shouldn't that be first?
00:51:00.780 Here's what I would consider a good response.
00:51:04.900 Well, you know, Putin's a liar, and the thing he said happened literally didn't even happen.
00:51:10.500 That never even happened.
00:51:11.580 And Tucker should have been more critical about that, because he's, you know, it's just fake news.
00:51:20.720 But instead, he decided to destroy Tucker's personal credibility.
00:51:30.680 Who does that if they can just go after the fact?
00:51:35.000 Nobody does an ad hominem first if they can just say the thing didn't happen.
00:51:40.060 Now, if you say the thing didn't happen, and then you go on and insult the person, then you're just Trump.
00:51:47.780 Right?
00:51:48.580 But when Trump insults people, it's usually over a thing, like a policy, a thing.
00:51:55.980 Right?
00:51:57.280 It's not just a whole bunch of insults.
00:51:59.180 And he looked a little unhinged, and I think if you do a full-on personal attack and you don't do more of just a matter-of-fact denial of the facts behind it, you can't really fail harder than that.
00:52:18.660 To me, it looked like another Putin victory over the West. 0.57
00:52:23.820 My current thinking is that everything the West did in Ukraine was wrong, and that, you know, I'm not going to support Putin, but I can just talk about my own side.
00:52:38.420 Everything my side did looks wrong from the 2014 coup to today.
00:52:45.360 It all looks wrong to me.
00:52:46.860 So I don't have to say Putin's good or Putin's right or anything like that.
00:52:51.140 But when Johnson says that what Tucker should have talked about is how there's maiming and murdering of Ukrainians by Russia, really?
00:53:02.920 I mean, that's so transparently just trying to change the topic that it's almost like a confirmation of the accusation that he denied a chance to have peace.
00:53:13.840 I don't know if it's true, but the way he was reacting to it is as if it's true.
00:53:18.400 All right, so apparently the House Judiciary Committee is going after this district attorney, Fannie Willis, who's after Trump, as you know. 0.54
00:53:32.680 So it's not a coincidence that they would go after her because she's after Trump.
00:53:36.740 But what are they trying to get?
00:53:39.500 They're trying to figure out if she used federal funds illegally for her boyfriend or whatever.
00:53:47.540 Now, I would like to suggest the following strategy.
00:53:53.460 Does it seem to you that a lot of these Soros-backed prosecutors and DAs,
00:53:59.500 does it look like they're all corrupt?
00:54:03.320 That they're all using public money for their boyfriends or something?
00:54:07.340 So would it make sense for the Republicans to, since they have that big legal fund that Stephen Miller's doing,
00:54:15.620 wouldn't it make sense to simply investigate every one of the Soros DAs to target them for lawfare
00:54:24.220 and just take them out with lawfare?
00:54:28.400 Because you could actually take down the whole Soros network by targeting them one after another
00:54:33.600 and just really go horribly at them.
00:54:35.340 Now, keep in mind, under a situation of normal politics, I would never suggest this.
00:54:42.380 I don't think you should be going looking for crimes.
00:54:45.680 That's the worst freaking thing you could do in America.
00:54:48.340 But the Soros prosecutors, I consider an invasion.
00:54:52.560 To me, that's an unfriendly force operating domestically.
00:54:56.200 I mean, it's almost like domestic terrorism.
00:54:58.620 So under the sense that it's not almost, it is domestic terrorism.
00:55:02.900 It is domestic terrorism.
00:55:05.620 It is.
00:55:07.180 They're operating as domestic terrorists because they're hunting Republicans. 0.66
00:55:11.860 And I'm literally afraid of being locked up for not doing anything illegal.
00:55:18.440 So that's exactly terrorism.
00:55:21.620 Making people afraid to do legal things in their world because they think this horrible person will put them in jail.
00:55:29.380 So this is, I would put, I would put a billion dollars behind this if I had a billion dollars
00:55:36.160 to fund an absolute investigation of every Soros-funded candidate.
00:55:43.820 And anybody who takes money from a Soros entity should know that their underwear is going to be turned upside down.
00:55:51.900 And that the Republicans will target them only because of the Soros connection.
00:55:58.680 Not because they're Democrats.
00:56:00.760 If this were happening just because they're Democrats, absolutely no.
00:56:05.120 Absolutely no.
00:56:06.180 I do not approve of just looking for crimes because somebody's a Democrat.
00:56:11.640 No, no, no, no, no.
00:56:12.860 Don't do that.
00:56:13.500 But because they're Soros-funded and they seem to be fitting a pattern of domestic terrorism in the sense of legal,
00:56:22.600 misusing the legal system,
00:56:24.400 I think that they are completely legitimate targets for lawfare.
00:56:31.320 Completely legitimate.
00:56:32.540 And I wouldn't use lawfare in any other situation unless it was, you know, something that looks like literally terrorism or an attack on our nation.
00:56:44.900 So, yeah, lawfare it up.
00:56:50.640 Kamala Harris was talking to some folks, some class of future leaders,
00:56:56.900 and she said this, and it's so brilliant.
00:57:01.680 It will probably be quoted much like the Martin Luther King, you know, I had a dream.
00:57:07.880 Possibly like Abe Lincoln, four score, 20 years ago.
00:57:13.580 Maybe like Kennedy.
00:57:15.560 Kennedy asks, you know, ask not what your country can do for you.
00:57:21.120 But somewhere in that category is this.
00:57:23.940 The brilliance of this inaugural class and its leaders is the ability to see what can be unburdened by what has been and then to make it real.
00:57:39.160 I don't know.
00:57:39.940 Has anybody ever said that before?
00:57:42.240 Yes.
00:57:42.700 It's the only thing she says every time she goes anywhere.
00:57:46.000 Because if you haven't heard it before, it sounds kind of awesome.
00:57:48.720 If you've heard it over and over again, it gets less awesome every time you hear it.
00:57:55.780 So, I would like to suggest that the funniest thing about 2024 is watching DEI destroy the Democratic Party.
00:58:05.300 Because that's what's happening.
00:58:07.520 So, DEI, as you know, would be the favoring of, you know, minority and women over white men primarily.
00:58:15.060 But also Asian Americans.
00:58:19.280 And in this case, DEI caused the Democrats to hire Kamala Harris as the vice president.
00:58:25.440 And I don't think there's anybody listening to this who would disagree that she's a DEI hire.
00:58:31.420 Is that fair?
00:58:32.780 Because I can't imagine it was because of capability.
00:58:36.200 Right?
00:58:36.740 Would everybody agree that she's a DEI hire?
00:58:39.400 And it's obvious.
00:58:40.160 Now, likewise, just to be fair, if Trump picked Tim Scott, I would say that's a DEI hire.
00:58:48.900 Even though Tim Scott's a solid senator.
00:58:51.660 Would you agree?
00:58:53.020 I mean, it would be sort of too on the nose.
00:58:55.640 I was like, okay.
00:58:56.780 All right.
00:58:57.160 It's because you're black. 1.00
00:58:58.400 Right?
00:58:58.880 Now, if Trump picked as his vice president, Vivek, Ramaswamy, I would not say it's because he's brown.
00:59:08.480 I would say we just watched him impress the country with the best communication skills and political policies I've ever seen.
00:59:18.660 Right?
00:59:19.040 So it would be hard to sell that one as some kind of a minority DEI thing.
00:59:24.400 That would be a genuine case of the, I'll call it the Bill Ackman style of diversity.
00:59:31.140 Or really what Mark Cuban wishes it were, but it isn't, which is you pick the best person and, whoa, they're brown too.
00:59:41.680 Then you get yourself some free diversity.
00:59:44.320 But if you're not getting it for free, then it's a DEI hire.
00:59:49.220 Tim Scott's solid.
00:59:51.200 Tim Scott is solid.
00:59:52.100 But you would see it as a DEI hire because he's not of Vivek, right?
00:59:58.780 If Vivek didn't exist, I might feel differently.
01:00:01.700 But he's such an obvious better choice.
01:00:05.240 So here's what makes it funny.
01:00:07.680 Because Kamala Harris was hired as vice president,
01:00:12.080 Biden can't quit because everybody knows that she's too weak to take over for the president, 1.00
01:00:21.780 which was the entire point of a vice president.
01:00:24.580 The entire point is you have to be smart, you know, good enough to take over.
01:00:28.440 Now, you could argue that Pence, you know, wasn't as strong as Trump.
01:00:33.260 But you know what?
01:00:34.720 He could have taken over.
01:00:36.920 You know, you could imagine him winning an election.
01:00:39.320 I could imagine it.
01:00:40.460 But, you know, he wouldn't be my choice for president either.
01:00:44.780 But you could imagine it.
01:00:45.760 He's like, he's a serious person, right?
01:00:49.900 But Kamala, I don't even think the Democrats think she has a chance 0.99
01:00:53.480 or would be the right person for president.
01:00:58.700 So they've got themselves in a bind where they can't get rid of Biden
01:01:01.940 and they also can't win with him.
01:01:05.240 They can't get rid of him and they can't win.
01:01:07.740 And it's only going to get worse because he will keep degrading between now and election day.
01:01:12.640 In theory, the DEI hire should make Biden lose bad
01:01:20.880 when, in fact, it would be an obvious solution if she were a strong candidate, right?
01:01:27.000 The obvious solution would be, oh, well, Kamala can take over 1.00
01:01:31.560 and I'm not feeling so good and she could win this election as easily as I could. 0.89
01:01:37.020 Go ahead.
01:01:38.640 Obvious, an obvious solution.
01:01:41.540 But they can't do it.
01:01:42.860 Because they hired Kamala and they can't fire her. 1.00
01:01:45.680 Can't replace her with another black woman. 1.00
01:01:48.140 Can you imagine that?
01:01:49.800 Can you imagine, do some people say that Michelle Obama,
01:01:52.600 let me tell you why Michelle Obama can't happen.
01:01:56.340 100% can't happen.
01:01:57.880 You're not going to replace a black woman with another black woman. 1.00
01:02:02.720 It would make it look like the whole thing was a joke.
01:02:07.460 You know, kind of looks like that now.
01:02:09.140 But no, you're not going to do it.
01:02:11.680 So here's what I think is going to happen.
01:02:13.880 Kamala Harris got hired as a DEI hire.
01:02:17.380 She's made it impossible for them to win the presidency. 1.00
01:02:20.840 And if you lose the presidency that hard,
01:02:23.520 usually it has a down vote, down ballot effect, right?
01:02:28.000 Am I right?
01:02:30.460 I mean, usually.
01:02:32.020 The people don't say,
01:02:33.540 we like all the Democrats for Congress,
01:02:35.580 but we want a Republican president at the same time.
01:02:38.720 You know, on the same ballot, they don't usually say that.
01:02:41.040 So it's more likely they're going to say,
01:02:42.480 you know what, let's give the Republicans a shot.
01:02:45.820 Or, you know what, let's just not vote this time.
01:02:51.000 You don't have to shout at me that she's half black and half Indian. 0.99
01:02:55.180 I know it, but in the real world,
01:02:57.820 she's considered black for political reasons. 0.95
01:03:02.020 But I understand it's the same as calling Obama black.
01:03:06.880 In my mind, he's never been black.
01:03:09.400 Not a single day.
01:03:12.640 Do you agree?
01:03:13.360 In my mind, Obama's never been black, even once.
01:03:19.500 He's a person who is part white and part black.
01:03:23.820 And he's chosen that black is his better branding. 0.68
01:03:28.980 Because you know why?
01:03:31.220 Because claiming you're white is a disadvantage.
01:03:33.720 No better example, right?
01:03:38.700 Now, obviously, if he claimed he's white, nobody would believe it. 0.94
01:03:41.680 But he can claim he's black, and people are like, oh, okay. 0.92
01:03:46.240 Like, where does that come from?
01:03:47.480 Why can't he claim he's black when you're half black? 1.00
01:03:53.060 Like, who makes those rules?
01:03:55.800 And by the way, I don't mind.
01:03:57.720 Like, it's perfectly fair.
01:03:59.940 But like, where does that come from,
01:04:01.060 that we all just accept that that's like a normal thing to do?
01:04:04.720 Like, you just ignore half of him.
01:04:07.540 Why does that make sense?
01:04:08.520 Is it because society would treat him as black?
01:04:14.100 Which is a fair point.
01:04:15.760 It's the same point I make with Kamala.
01:04:20.660 I think that the non-Indian public just treats her as black,
01:04:24.840 which is not accurate either.
01:04:29.600 All right.
01:04:32.300 So, President Biden,
01:04:34.360 one of the ways he likes to prove
01:04:36.680 that he's not mentally incompetent
01:04:38.640 is sending other people out
01:04:40.940 to argue that he's not mentally incompetent.
01:04:43.920 Because that's how you do it, right?
01:04:46.380 If you want to prove that you can speak in public
01:04:48.800 in a capable way,
01:04:50.700 you send other people to speak for you in public
01:04:53.220 to say that if you were there,
01:04:54.900 you could actually make sense, but you're not there.
01:04:57.840 Because that's very persuasive.
01:05:00.200 Oh, yeah.
01:05:02.360 I guess he could just
01:05:03.620 pick up his phone
01:05:05.620 and point it at his face
01:05:06.720 and prove that he is coherent
01:05:08.440 simply by talking into his phone
01:05:10.080 for 15 seconds
01:05:11.080 and then posting it.
01:05:12.740 I mean, that would do it.
01:05:14.480 But instead,
01:05:15.120 he's going to send out
01:05:15.900 an army of people who are not him
01:05:17.420 to say that behind closed doors,
01:05:19.620 he's totally lucid.
01:05:22.460 I don't see how that could be
01:05:23.980 less persuasive.
01:05:26.040 But something good came from it,
01:05:27.860 which is his lawyer saying that
01:05:29.400 the special,
01:05:32.780 what is it,
01:05:33.280 the prosecutor guy,
01:05:34.760 her,
01:05:36.080 went beyond his remit.
01:05:39.360 I was listening to that in the car
01:05:41.180 and I heard the lawyer say
01:05:43.220 that they think that
01:05:44.400 the special prosecutor
01:05:45.980 went beyond his remit.
01:05:48.740 You know what the first thing
01:05:49.620 I said to myself was?
01:05:51.200 Mental note.
01:05:52.460 Keep that word for later.
01:05:54.540 I'm totally going to say
01:05:55.720 something went beyond his remit.
01:05:58.180 Maybe before the end
01:05:59.300 of this live stream
01:06:00.420 because I like it so much.
01:06:02.040 It sounded so smart.
01:06:04.200 I heard him say,
01:06:05.280 and I believe he went
01:06:06.060 past his remit.
01:06:07.380 And I was like,
01:06:08.420 what?
01:06:09.940 What?
01:06:10.920 I'm totally using that.
01:06:14.560 So,
01:06:16.000 you can make comments here,
01:06:18.580 sure,
01:06:19.480 but don't go beyond your remit.
01:06:21.220 All right.
01:06:27.000 Yeah,
01:06:27.520 and the real problem
01:06:28.320 is that he pointed it out,
01:06:29.600 not that it's true.
01:06:32.440 We're acting like
01:06:33.340 the real problem
01:06:34.120 is that the special prosecutor
01:06:35.860 pointed out
01:06:36.780 that Biden is mentally degraded.
01:06:41.180 I feel like the reality
01:06:42.700 should be the only conversation here.
01:06:44.940 Did he get it wrong?
01:06:46.700 And the thought that
01:06:48.360 if that's what the special prosecutor
01:06:50.660 really thought and believed,
01:06:52.900 how in the world
01:06:53.920 is that not relevant?
01:06:56.360 That's pretty relevant.
01:07:00.880 I'm seeing a dad joke,
01:07:02.500 which I'm going to repeat,
01:07:03.900 that the definition of remit
01:07:06.020 is when Mitt Romney
01:07:07.340 runs for president yet again.
01:07:09.880 You're remitting.
01:07:11.300 Yeah,
01:07:11.520 it's not bad.
01:07:13.020 B minus.
01:07:15.160 All right.
01:07:17.780 Trump's talking about
01:07:18.780 Biden's classified documents,
01:07:21.180 and he says,
01:07:22.040 if Biden's not going to be charged,
01:07:23.600 then I should not be charged.
01:07:25.320 This is nothing more
01:07:26.160 than selective prosecution.
01:07:29.400 Well,
01:07:29.980 now the Democrats would argue
01:07:31.320 it's not about the documents,
01:07:32.820 it's about the resisting
01:07:34.000 of the process
01:07:35.160 for giving them back.
01:07:36.160 But is it good persuasion
01:07:39.080 for Trump
01:07:39.720 to ignore that fine point
01:07:41.840 and just say,
01:07:43.420 hey,
01:07:43.740 it's documents.
01:07:44.860 We should be treated the same.
01:07:46.320 It is.
01:07:47.500 It's not honest.
01:07:51.320 It's not honest.
01:07:53.260 Because if we were being honest,
01:07:54.820 he'd say,
01:07:55.140 okay,
01:07:55.580 a little bit of it
01:07:56.300 is about my resisting
01:07:58.440 giving them back.
01:07:59.680 But he should also say,
01:08:00.980 if we were being honest,
01:08:02.000 we thought we had
01:08:02.920 like a legal process going.
01:08:05.700 You know,
01:08:05.880 we were in conversations,
01:08:07.360 you know,
01:08:07.660 probably could have been resolved.
01:08:10.860 But it's good persuasion
01:08:12.160 because the country
01:08:13.100 doesn't know the difference
01:08:14.420 between those two cases.
01:08:16.140 And no matter how many times
01:08:17.820 MSNBC explains,
01:08:19.760 no,
01:08:20.400 it's not about the documents.
01:08:22.500 Oh,
01:08:22.680 yes,
01:08:22.920 we were complaining about
01:08:23.940 it was just about
01:08:24.900 the documents before.
01:08:26.540 But now,
01:08:27.840 now it's not about
01:08:28.680 just the documents.
01:08:30.120 Now it's about the process.
01:08:31.500 Nobody listens.
01:08:33.680 The average voter
01:08:34.920 is just going to look
01:08:35.860 at those two situations
01:08:37.300 and say,
01:08:37.900 they look alike to me.
01:08:39.320 They both took documents.
01:08:40.640 One got away with it.
01:08:41.700 One didn't.
01:08:43.000 That's what it's going
01:08:43.820 to look like.
01:08:44.660 Right.
01:08:44.800 So,
01:08:45.360 yes,
01:08:45.900 Trump's instinct
01:08:47.740 on persuasion
01:08:48.500 is exactly right.
01:08:50.420 It's exactly right.
01:08:51.460 It's not fully honest,
01:08:53.460 but it's very persuasive.
01:08:57.320 All right.
01:09:00.320 And Trump said
01:09:01.720 about the border bill
01:09:02.620 that,
01:09:03.080 I think I mentioned this,
01:09:05.020 that
01:09:05.280 if the Senate
01:09:08.080 wants to pass
01:09:08.760 a real border bill,
01:09:10.080 they should establish
01:09:11.060 criminal penalties
01:09:12.340 for senior Biden officials
01:09:14.360 who refuse
01:09:15.140 to enforce
01:09:15.840 the existing law.
01:09:18.160 Now,
01:09:18.700 I have two thoughts
01:09:19.560 about that.
01:09:21.320 I don't think
01:09:22.440 you want
01:09:23.040 crimes
01:09:24.740 for not doing
01:09:26.600 your job.
01:09:27.300 I feel like
01:09:28.980 that's a bad precedent
01:09:30.000 because everybody
01:09:31.340 accuses everybody
01:09:32.140 of not doing
01:09:32.740 their job.
01:09:33.920 So,
01:09:34.220 if you make it
01:09:34.980 a crime
01:09:35.500 to not do
01:09:36.160 your job,
01:09:36.980 even if you're
01:09:37.580 a government official,
01:09:39.260 it feels like
01:09:39.940 the wrong move.
01:09:41.160 Like,
01:09:41.460 that's going to
01:09:41.860 come back
01:09:42.180 and bite you 0.90
01:09:42.600 in the ass 0.84
01:09:42.980 later.
01:09:44.180 It seems like
01:09:44.960 the right move
01:09:45.720 for not doing
01:09:46.400 your job
01:09:46.960 should be
01:09:47.420 impeachment
01:09:47.940 and,
01:09:48.560 you know,
01:09:48.760 getting fired
01:09:49.400 and all the usual
01:09:50.360 removed-from-job
01:09:51.800 kind of things.
01:09:52.620 but it's
01:09:56.520 good persuasion.
01:09:57.760 It puts you
01:09:58.860 in the frame
01:09:59.440 of understanding
01:10:00.440 that what
01:10:00.880 they're doing
01:10:01.380 is criminal
01:10:03.720 in its
01:10:04.580 impact.
01:10:06.980 It's not
01:10:07.660 technically illegal
01:10:08.620 to not do
01:10:09.520 your job,
01:10:10.300 but it's
01:10:11.140 criminal-like
01:10:12.840 in its impact.
01:10:14.160 It has a
01:10:14.780 criminal outcome.
01:10:17.580 So,
01:10:18.080 yes,
01:10:18.360 good persuasion,
01:10:19.460 not totally
01:10:20.280 technically correct.
01:10:22.620 All right,
01:10:23.740 let me finish
01:10:24.320 this off
01:10:24.720 by reading
01:10:25.220 a summary
01:10:26.040 by Uncommon Sense.
01:10:28.920 That's an
01:10:29.660 account on
01:10:30.540 the X platform.
01:10:32.260 And it says,
01:10:33.520 Tyranny is here.
01:10:35.680 And I'll just
01:10:36.160 read it the way
01:10:36.700 it's written.
01:10:38.760 They want to
01:10:39.840 charge Tucker
01:10:40.600 Carlson with
01:10:41.320 espionage for
01:10:42.300 journalism.
01:10:43.200 Now,
01:10:43.440 the they is
01:10:44.080 the Democrats.
01:10:45.460 So,
01:10:45.820 they want to
01:10:46.260 charge Tucker
01:10:47.040 Carlson with
01:10:47.700 espionage for
01:10:48.820 journalism.
01:10:49.920 They already
01:10:50.980 charged the
01:10:51.580 January 6th
01:10:52.300 protesters for
01:10:53.660 protesting.
01:10:54.820 They charged
01:10:55.480 Trump for
01:10:55.940 being a good
01:10:56.460 president and
01:10:57.260 not going along
01:10:57.920 with their
01:10:58.200 plan.
01:10:58.660 They rigged
01:10:59.120 the Democrat
01:10:59.680 primary for
01:11:00.540 Biden.
01:11:01.360 They're charging
01:11:02.020 RFK Jr.
01:11:02.860 for financing
01:11:03.660 issues,
01:11:04.300 in quotes.
01:11:05.220 All the
01:11:05.580 Bidens have 1.00
01:11:06.140 been implicated
01:11:06.780 in well-documented
01:11:07.600 crimes and not
01:11:08.620 charged.
01:11:09.600 That's not
01:11:10.240 true.
01:11:11.960 Hunter's being
01:11:13.140 charged for the
01:11:14.340 gun stuff.
01:11:15.260 They want to
01:11:15.860 remove the most
01:11:16.460 popular candidate
01:11:17.200 from the ballot
01:11:17.860 and tell you
01:11:19.100 why he's a
01:11:19.620 threat to
01:11:20.080 democracy.
01:11:22.300 Tyranny is not
01:11:23.140 in the future.
01:11:23.960 It is here.
01:11:25.340 The emperor
01:11:25.800 has no clothes.
01:11:26.880 All we have to
01:11:27.580 do is acknowledge
01:11:28.260 it.
01:11:29.600 See,
01:11:29.920 that's one of
01:11:30.820 those emperor
01:11:31.280 has no clothes
01:11:32.060 things that
01:11:32.720 gets a little
01:11:34.820 overused,
01:11:35.580 but in the
01:11:36.100 specific case,
01:11:37.140 I allow it.
01:11:38.920 Now,
01:11:40.200 this tyranny
01:11:42.000 thing sneaks up
01:11:42.960 on you,
01:11:43.280 doesn't it?
01:11:44.680 Because I
01:11:45.240 don't wake
01:11:45.580 up in the
01:11:45.900 morning and
01:11:46.240 say,
01:11:46.440 oh,
01:11:46.660 I'm in
01:11:46.900 tyranny,
01:11:47.380 but when you
01:11:48.040 see the
01:11:48.400 full list,
01:11:49.600 it doesn't
01:11:50.100 look like any
01:11:50.680 kind of
01:11:50.960 republic,
01:11:51.880 does it?
01:11:55.000 Did I
01:11:55.560 retweet it?
01:11:57.620 I don't
01:11:58.180 remember.
01:11:58.620 I may have.
01:12:01.680 Yeah,
01:12:02.240 so we do
01:12:03.060 look like a
01:12:03.860 country which
01:12:04.700 has lost its
01:12:05.860 core principles.
01:12:08.720 We look like a
01:12:09.440 country that
01:12:10.120 our systems
01:12:11.780 have been
01:12:13.440 destroyed and
01:12:15.100 we're resulting
01:12:16.540 to tribalism,
01:12:19.060 you know,
01:12:19.320 insults and
01:12:20.000 tribalism because
01:12:20.920 the system is
01:12:21.620 destroyed.
01:12:22.640 And why is the
01:12:23.640 system destroyed?
01:12:25.500 I think it's
01:12:26.480 wokeness and
01:12:28.300 DEI.
01:12:29.540 I think that
01:12:30.420 they have
01:12:30.700 destroyed the
01:12:31.360 American system
01:12:32.180 so that we
01:12:33.360 don't have the
01:12:33.820 option of using
01:12:34.560 the system.
01:12:35.660 We only have
01:12:36.560 the option of
01:12:37.180 arguing like
01:12:38.100 my tribe has
01:12:40.460 to kill
01:12:40.780 everybody in
01:12:41.320 your tribe.
01:12:41.700 So wokeness
01:12:44.040 did in fact
01:12:45.060 and I think
01:12:46.580 it was Tim
01:12:46.980 Poole was
01:12:47.380 pointing out
01:12:47.940 that it goes
01:12:48.980 all the way
01:12:49.340 back to
01:12:49.740 Gamergate days
01:12:50.780 and if you
01:12:52.540 trace the
01:12:53.220 wokeness all
01:12:54.900 the way through
01:12:55.540 what it's
01:12:56.000 become,
01:12:56.760 you know,
01:12:56.980 DEI and
01:12:57.780 CRT and
01:12:58.440 everything else,
01:12:59.520 that it is
01:13:00.380 indeed,
01:13:02.600 it's really
01:13:03.780 clear to see
01:13:04.420 that as the
01:13:05.280 complete
01:13:06.380 progression of
01:13:07.900 tyranny.
01:13:08.220 so there
01:13:11.360 you are.
01:13:12.960 There's a
01:13:13.340 whole summary
01:13:13.900 of everything
01:13:14.420 and I
01:13:17.460 believe that's
01:13:17.980 all I needed
01:13:18.380 to tell you
01:13:18.880 today so I'm
01:13:19.600 going to say
01:13:19.900 goodbye to
01:13:20.400 the folks on
01:13:21.860 X who are
01:13:22.380 watching and
01:13:22.900 the Rumble
01:13:23.360 platform and
01:13:24.980 on YouTube.
01:13:26.560 Thanks for
01:13:26.920 joining.
01:13:27.380 I will be
01:13:27.780 here tomorrow,
01:13:29.200 same time.
01:13:30.340 By the way,
01:13:30.780 if you watch
01:13:31.260 this show on
01:13:33.580 the big screen
01:13:34.180 TV with a
01:13:36.940 blanket over
01:13:37.560 your legs and
01:13:39.020 a cat laying
01:13:40.000 on the blanket
01:13:41.220 on your legs,
01:13:42.140 it is actually
01:13:43.000 the best way to
01:13:43.620 watch the show.
01:13:45.260 So do that
01:13:46.760 next time.
01:13:48.260 See you next,
01:13:49.140 see you tomorrow.
01:13:49.840 See you tomorrow.