Dr. Lori Schimek, PhD says that Alzheimer s is more a lifestyle disease than a genetic one. I m tempted to believe this. Do you think I should do a video on my eating system? I m not trying to tell you how to eat right, I m trying to show you my system.
00:06:59.040Because I would seem to them like an unfriendly, and then they'd be going on to a show with somebody who's loaded with information they haven't seen yet
00:07:09.140to make a claim that they probably wouldn't have a good response to, even if it was a fake claim.
00:07:15.220They wouldn't be prepared for the claim.
00:09:19.360I mean, if you were going to do it in a reasonable way, you'd have a big project with both sides and multiple people from both sides and you dig into every claim and all that.
00:09:29.720That's a lot of resources and nobody's going to do it.
00:09:32.000Because it would require both sides to have the same interest in the truth.
00:10:04.260That's the risk reward there is pretty bad.
00:10:07.500There is a video I haven't watched yet, but I reposted it in case you want to see it.
00:10:12.940It's called The American History of Voter Fraud.
00:10:16.440So what it purports to do is give you a tour of all the, I guess they would say, confirmed election problems since JFK, Lyndon Johnson days.
00:10:43.380Unfortunately, it's going to show you one side.
00:10:46.380And I'm sure that one side, based on just the preview, looks like it's going to tell you that there's been rampant voter fraud forever in America.
00:14:09.760So there was some user of Instagram who was getting a bunch of pedos and kept blocking them until there was that message that came on saying that she couldn't block any more pedophiles.
00:14:23.360And so this raised the question, what is the allowed number of pedophiles?
00:14:33.380I know it's just, I'm just having a joke with it, obviously.
00:14:39.760But it does create a situation where by the nature of the design, it would appear that there's an allowable number of pedophiles.
00:14:52.400It's like, you know, that first 25, totally unacceptable.
00:15:16.880This is obviously just a system kind of mistake.
00:15:19.800Well, I would refer you to Mark Andreessen, one of the more notable, famous Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, and also one of the smarter people in the Valley.
00:15:32.260And he reminded us in a separate topic, it wasn't about this topic, but yesterday he reminded us that the purpose of any design is what it does, or the purpose of any system.
00:15:46.340The purpose of a system is what it does.
00:15:49.760So there's no such thing as pretending it does one thing while observing it does another.
00:16:00.060Temporarily, you could build a system that doesn't do what you want.
00:16:04.320But if you build a system that doesn't do what you want, and you don't change it, ever, then one must assume it's doing what you want, because it's changeable.
00:17:05.200Do you accept that Biden is, quote, clearly in partnership with the cartels?
00:17:13.000Well, this gets us back to the design of the system, doesn't it?
00:17:17.240If you add a system which gave the cartels everything they wanted and it gave you nothing that you wanted, the country, what would be the best working assumption about how we got to that place?
00:17:30.600Now, I would like to introduce a concept to you.
00:17:36.180I've used it before, but I did a bad job of explaining why.
00:17:42.740And you should introduce that into your vocabulary, and I'm going to make a strong argument for it.
00:17:47.720What we normally do is say, this is true, even if we don't know for sure, or this is false, even if we don't know for sure, or we don't know, and then, you know, that's useless.
00:18:01.960So, whenever you say something's true, you're going to get pushed back.
00:18:05.420Whenever you say something's false, you're going to get pushed back.
00:18:07.680And then, you both agree to disagree, and nothing happens.
00:18:12.180That's why I'm introducing this new term that's harder to deal with.
00:18:50.820Those are the things you want, and you'd want those, right, if you want to find out what's true.
00:18:55.940But here's why the working assumption gets past that.
00:19:00.540I say, I look at the border, and I say, my working assumption is that it's intentional, because, as Marc Andreessen points out, and he didn't invent this concept, he was just pointing it out, that the design has gone on too long.
00:19:17.840The system has been in place under Biden, you know, he changed Trump's system.
00:19:24.160Trump's system was clearly intended to reduce immigration.
00:19:30.080Nobody wonders, because he did a thing, you know, he changed a bunch of processes and executive orders and whatever.
00:19:39.980He said, yes, that's what we wanted to do.
00:19:42.280And then we observed that it kept doing.
00:19:45.280That would be a case where there's no doubt whatsoever what the system was designed to do.
00:19:50.560Now, Biden comes in, changes a bunch of things, gets a result that is obviously bad for the country and obviously good for the cartels.
00:20:00.600If he had changed it a month after implementing it, when it was, you know, clear what it was going to do, then I would say, oh, that was just a bad mistake.
00:20:12.280But if you keep it running, and you keep pretending you can stop it when everybody knows you can, oh, I don't have the power.
00:20:21.300I don't know how I'd ever go about stopping this.
00:20:25.060And time goes by, years, and it becomes the biggest problem in your country, and you still don't stop it.
00:20:32.900The working assumption is that some element to the government is working with the cartels.
00:20:39.800Now, I don't buy Ken Paxton's framing because he says Biden is clearly in partnership.
00:20:47.440I actually think Biden might want to stop it.
00:20:49.980I don't think there's evidence that I don't think there's evidence he's in charge.
00:20:53.520I think that politically, it's so bad for Biden that if he were in charge, he would have stopped it.
00:20:59.440It's obvious to me, it's my working assumption, that the CIA is working with the cartels, which would be normal business, because the CIA likes to partner with muscle.
00:21:11.660They have partnered with, you know, probably every bad organization in our country and others, because they're the muscle.
00:21:21.920You know, you want to own the unions if they're going to march.
00:21:39.480But rather, they have maybe an interest, an association based on self-interest.
00:21:46.260My guess is that since I've never heard once of a cartel bothering an American manufacturing company in Mexico, that there's no way that's an accident.
00:21:56.100It looks like an arrangement in which the CIA is allowing the cartels to earn as much money as they want through their illegal activities in return for letting the American corporations be non-molested.
00:22:33.000As a working assumption that is compatible with what I see as a system which seems to be designed for this output, my working assumption is that the system, given that it's operated for a few years now, is intentional.
00:22:48.700And if you want to talk me out of that working assumption, which is not a belief, it's not a belief, and it's not a fact, it's a working assumption.
00:23:00.880If you want to talk me out of it, you're going to have to prove it.
00:23:32.140And if it's been running for a few years and it wasn't originally corrected when we had the chance, you should assume, working assumption, that it's intentional.
00:23:42.080And that the most obvious reason is that there's some kind of working relationship with the cartels.
00:24:41.300And there's not really, I don't even know another explanation that would even come close to fitting all the observations.
00:24:48.260Now, if you said to me, Scott, the human trafficking is up, but at least they cut down on the fentanyl, then I would say to myself, oh, it looks like they're really trying to stop the cartels from doing illegal things.
00:25:03.240But maybe one of those things is harder to stop than the other because they stopped one, you know, but the other one not so good.
00:25:10.660So I'd say the working assumption would be they're trying to stop it all, but one is a harder problem.
00:25:17.240But if you have a whole range of cartel activities that are only going in one direction, worse, my working assumption is that there's some kind of arrangement with our country in which we're allowing 100,000 people to die from fentanyl because we're getting something of value that compensates for that money.
00:25:41.940All right, working assumption, try it.
00:25:47.720I was thinking this today, you know, the founders of Google, a couple of white boys.
00:26:27.720And you wake up one day and you realize you've created this, the big, the most powerful, in my opinion, organization in the world, maybe in the history of the entire world.
00:26:40.820And you realize that you trained the staff and also the products, the search engines, the AI, to discriminate against people who look like you and your family.
00:26:52.460Is that unfair, that the founders of Google built the most powerful company in the world, and it's now trained the staff, almost the entire staff, and the product itself to discriminate against people who look like the founders of the company and their families?
00:28:43.640But in terms of turning the biggest company in the world into a discrimination machine, it's the biggest fuck-up in all of business history.
00:28:52.900I don't think anything's ever come close.
00:30:01.580It's one of those stories where if you talk to the jail, they might have some reason you don't know about, you know, maybe had some bad behavior we're not aware of.
00:30:09.620But I would certainly suspect that it fits the pattern of the Department of Justice being corrupt and biased.
00:30:46.040If you believe your rights come from God.
00:30:48.200And I guess the idea is that our rights do not come from God, and we do not live in a system which would recognize that our rights come from God.
00:31:00.620And the way that you know that we have a system that does not recognize that rights come from God is that in its creation, it had these words, endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights.