Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2405 CWSA 03⧸06⧸24

00:00:00.580 Searchlight Pictures presents The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.

00:00:04.980 From the director of Meet the Parents and the writer of Poor Things,

00:00:08.460 comes The Roses, starring Academy Award winner Olivia Colman,

00:00:12.460 Academy Award nominee Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon, and Allison Janney.

00:00:17.820 A hilarious new comedy filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of hatred,

00:00:22.540 proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses.

00:00:25.780 See The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.

00:00:28.500 Get tickets now.

00:00:30.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:42.520 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, because that's what it is.

00:00:46.200 And if you'd like to take your experience up another notch,

00:00:49.160 and it's almost impossible to believe that there could be a higher level

00:00:52.440 than what you're experiencing right now, it can happen.

00:00:56.120 And all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tanker, chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:01:04.380 Filled with your favorite liquid.

00:01:05.920 I like coffee.

00:01:07.640 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:01:09.780 The dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:12.160 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

00:01:14.820 Go.

00:01:15.420 Delightful.

00:01:20.720 Yes.

00:01:21.960 Delightful.

00:01:24.420 Well, if you are listening to this recorded today, later, on Spotify,

00:01:30.560 I don't know if I'm going to stay on Spotify.

00:01:33.540 I got demonetized recently, but I can't tell if it has something to do with me.

00:01:38.240 I don't think it does.

00:01:39.700 Or it has something to do with a change in their user interface that I can't figure out.

00:01:45.760 So something changed.

00:01:47.440 So I went from being monetized to demonetized.

00:01:53.260 You know, there was a change in how they do the advertisements.

00:01:57.300 I don't know.

00:01:58.100 So if it disappears on Spotify, you can watch it commercial-free on X or Locals if you're a subscriber.

00:02:06.320 Or on YouTube if you're paying for YouTube, you don't see commercials.

00:02:11.280 Or you can see it on Rumble as well.

00:02:14.340 So lots of choices.

00:02:16.740 Well, the most important story of the day while we're waiting for people to stream on in here,

00:02:21.520 obviously we'll talk about Super Tuesday.

00:02:23.740 But in even bigger news, a Southern California man,

00:02:28.760 he was staying at the Venetian Palazzo Tower in Las Vegas,

00:02:33.380 and he reports being stung by a scorpion on his testicles while sleeping at the hotel.

00:02:39.860 Stung by a scorpion on his testicles.

00:02:43.680 Well, that's how I feel every time I read the news.

00:02:47.240 Am I right?

00:02:47.800 I feel like I've been stung on my testicles by a scorpion.

00:02:53.680 So let's talk about the news today.

00:02:56.220 By the time I'm done, probably at least 80% of you will feel like you've been stung by a scorpion on your testicles.

00:03:05.020 But the rest of you, you'll feel great today.

00:03:08.300 All right.

00:03:08.620 Congratulations to the anonymous account X on X called End Wokeness.

00:03:17.860 Now, probably every single day I mention one of their posts.

00:03:22.740 I don't know who it is.

00:03:23.940 It's an anonymous account.

00:03:25.860 But it has built quite a system here.

00:03:30.540 So for reasons that I don't completely understand,

00:03:33.980 End Wokeness seems to get all the wokeness stories that you haven't heard anywhere else yet.

00:03:40.580 And I think yesterday alone had three successes.

00:03:46.200 Now, let me explain the model.

00:03:48.200 Apparently, the End Wokeness account got enough attention

00:03:51.200 that if anyone anywhere sees some stuff that looks like it would make sense for that account,

00:03:57.140 they send it to them.

00:03:58.560 And then the End Wokeness figures out which ones to post.

00:04:02.020 And because they're so good, whoever it is,

00:04:05.060 I often repost them as to a number of other large accounts.

00:04:09.660 So although the End Wokeness account is several hundred thousand, I think,

00:04:13.340 I don't know what the number is,

00:04:14.760 but I send it to another million of my followers,

00:04:18.580 a number of other people post it.

00:04:20.060 So probably this one account is probably pinging 50 million people a day.

00:04:27.480 Just a gigantic number through the multiplier effect.

00:04:33.120 But here's two things that happened because of that clever business model.

00:04:39.360 So you heard the story about the Veterans Administration.

00:04:43.080 They banned the use of the iconic World War II photo where there's a sailor coming in from the war,

00:04:50.340 the war's over, and grabs a young lady and bends her over and kisses her passionately,

00:04:55.840 but they didn't know each other.

00:04:57.600 And so the idea was that it was not a consented, there was no consent.

00:05:02.000 So the Veterans Administration said, well, we've got to get rid of this iconic photo.

00:05:08.020 There's no consent.

00:05:10.860 But End Wokeness made fun of that. 1.00

00:05:13.060 It became a big thing on the X platform.

00:05:15.080 And the next thing you know, when apparently the boss of whoever made the decision

00:05:20.560 found out about it on X.

00:05:22.920 In other words, somebody made a decision that their boss didn't know about,

00:05:28.420 and if not for End Wokeness, probably wouldn't have found out.

00:05:32.200 Now, it's not the biggest important story in the world, but it got reversed.

00:05:37.020 So there's that.

00:05:39.020 Then you probably heard the story about the Spanish Doritos marketing people.

00:05:44.560 They started using a transgender influencer who apparently had said some alarming things

00:05:51.340 about doing thuggish things to a minor at some point in the past.

00:05:56.840 And End Wokeness brought that up, and Doritos changed their policy. 1.00

00:06:02.620 It just reversed it in like one day.

00:06:06.020 And there was one other I forgot to write down.

00:06:08.580 Maybe you know.

00:06:09.140 There was a third thing that all in one day, the End Wokeness account got reversed.

00:06:15.960 And it was just because of sunlight.

00:06:18.360 It was literally just because it got attention.

00:06:21.660 And the people who were in charge said, ah, I don't think we...

00:06:25.500 Oh, was it Johns Hopkins?

00:06:27.260 Did they get rid of...

00:06:28.920 They got rid of some racist thing they were doing, right?

00:06:33.300 Might have been that.

00:06:34.200 That sounds familiar.

00:06:34.920 But three victories because a business model is very clever and well-executed with a lot

00:06:41.240 of energy.

00:06:44.580 Facebook, Michael Schellenberger says in his newest reports, there's secret emails that

00:06:51.640 show that Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook fact-checking program was compromised by biased activists,

00:07:00.580 says Michael Schellenberger.

00:07:02.020 Now, is that the kind of story that is new but not new?

00:07:09.560 Was there anybody watching this who was not fully aware that the fact-checking organizations

00:07:15.760 were fake and always were fake?

00:07:19.840 But so the fun thing about this election year is that...

00:07:25.020 Well, I'm just going to say it.

00:07:27.020 The 50 people who signed the laptop letter, the Hunter laptop letter hoax, that turned

00:07:38.540 out to be like the Rosetta Stone for figuring out everything.

00:07:44.720 Because I was really confused.

00:07:47.040 I used to be wondering, like, I wonder if Obama's really in charge.

00:07:52.160 I wonder if he's really in charge.

00:07:53.680 No, apparently not.

00:07:57.200 It looks like the laptop people are in charge.

00:08:00.520 So just look at the fact that nobody who signed the laptop letter got any blowback.

00:08:06.700 Nobody got fired.

00:08:09.120 Nothing.

00:08:10.240 Nothing.

00:08:10.500 So whoever has that kind of power, where they can do a hoax that blatantly right in front

00:08:17.760 of you, with no consequences whatsoever.

00:08:21.560 A few people asked some questions on the news, but nothing.

00:08:26.140 I mean, that shows you who's in charge.

00:08:27.720 Now, once you see the people who did that, you say to yourself, huh, if it looks like they

00:08:34.600 were in charge with that laptop thing, have those same people done anything else that we

00:08:40.500 should know about?

00:08:41.780 Oh, yeah.

00:08:42.900 The entire Russia collusion hoax was Brennan and Clapper.

00:08:48.420 Hmm.

00:08:48.760 Same people on the laptop hoax.

00:08:50.960 Hmm.

00:08:52.080 Same people who seem associated with some other shadowy exit and tell people.

00:08:56.420 like on the Atlantic Council and other places.

00:08:59.440 So I would say that we now understand the entire network of the fake NGOs, the Soros funding

00:09:07.220 of the prosecutors.

00:09:09.700 We see that the entire news organization is fake.

00:09:14.420 It's exactly what Trump said.

00:09:16.520 You know, when Trump started saying the news was fake, did you have the same impression I

00:09:22.400 did, which is, well, I mean, not completely fake.

00:09:25.560 You know, it's just, it's just not ideal.

00:09:28.820 It's not where you'd want it to be.

00:09:31.260 No, it's actually completely made up.

00:09:33.900 It's like completely made up.

00:09:36.300 Just insanely, ridiculously not even trying to be news.

00:09:40.380 Now, I'm not sure I was totally aware of that before.

00:09:43.420 I mean, let's say before the last seven years.

00:09:45.940 But we're certainly aware of it now.

00:09:48.940 So we all understand that the fact checkers are fake.

00:09:52.900 Do you need any proof that the fact checkers were always fake?

00:09:57.960 Where have they been?

00:09:59.600 They disappeared for the Biden administration.

00:10:02.680 He barely ever says anything that's true.

00:10:06.680 And the fact checkers just disappeared.

00:10:09.380 When was the last time he even heard about how many times he got fact checked?

00:10:12.540 Do you remember they used to keep a running total of all of the tens of thousands of fact

00:10:17.780 check problems that Trump had?

00:10:19.780 How many times has Biden said the fine people hoax?

00:10:22.700 Just that one.

00:10:23.680 Just that one.

00:10:24.240 If you were to fact check all of Biden's hoaxes, it would be pretty impressive.

00:10:31.060 And the only difference would be he doesn't talk as much in public because he's not capable.

00:10:36.400 If he had more energy, his lying would be way more impressive.

00:10:41.420 He doesn't have the energy to lie well enough.

00:10:44.800 Anyway, so would you agree that we can now see the entire, you can see the entire machinery

00:10:50.540 of the Democrat slash intelligence people who run the country?

00:10:55.620 You see it, right?

00:10:57.020 And we have the ability now to call the plays before they happen.

00:11:02.220 Does anybody think there won't be a new hoax over the summer?

00:11:05.640 Of course there will.

00:11:07.040 Of course there will.

00:11:08.220 We'll talk more about how transparent the entire thing is.

00:11:11.640 It's really different this time.

00:11:14.500 And when you watch MSNBC, you can do it just for the entertainment.

00:11:18.800 We'll talk about that.

00:11:20.540 All right, Nikki Haley is out after Super Tuesday because Trump had a good day.

00:11:27.700 I don't know what happened in Vermont, but Vermont picked Nikki Haley.

00:11:31.980 Oh, well.

00:11:34.240 So David Axelrod, you know, one of the prime reframers and shapers and message people of

00:11:40.820 the Democrat machine, he was talking about that, and he was kind of shocked that Republicans

00:11:51.020 would pick this, pick a candidate who was involved in the insurrection.

00:11:56.720 So I think the Democrats are pretty desperate to lock into their message that they could be Trump.

00:12:05.720 And it looks like they're going to go with the insurrection hoax.

00:12:08.840 That'll be their primary message.

00:12:10.920 So they, I mean, Biden did win one election, allegedly.

00:12:14.800 He won one election with a hoax, the fine people hoax.

00:12:19.980 So why not do it again?

00:12:21.540 It worked.

00:12:22.760 And it might work again.

00:12:25.800 How many of you heard the news that the winner of the American Samoa Democratic Caucus...

00:12:31.800 I don't think I could find American Samoa on a map.

00:12:38.980 Could you?

00:12:40.260 I don't even know what ocean it's in.

00:12:42.000 Where the hell is American Samoa?

00:12:45.760 Pacific?

00:12:46.780 I want to guess Pacific, but near Bora Bora.

00:12:52.680 Why is there an American Samoa?

00:12:55.420 I don't even know why we have it.

00:12:56.900 But anyway, somebody named Jason Palmer won the Democratic Caucus there.

00:13:02.480 Now, I guess that's some venture capitalist money guy.

00:13:06.020 And he's been running for president.

00:13:07.700 You never heard of him because he got, you know, dozens of votes in a few states.

00:13:11.260 But he actually conquered American Samoa.

00:13:14.340 And I'd love to know his real story.

00:13:17.460 I'd love to know if it's just a practical joke.

00:13:20.260 Because I don't think he planned on winning.

00:13:23.540 So why was he doing it?

00:13:24.960 And it makes me think, I kind of want to see if I can win American Samoa next time.

00:13:33.080 Who wants me to do that?

00:13:35.620 I mean, I don't know if it's a nice place to visit.

00:13:37.900 But if it is, I think I could spend two weeks there and take the whole place.

00:13:43.660 I think there were only like 100 votes.

00:13:46.180 The entire caucus was like 100 votes.

00:13:48.500 I could visit all of them.

00:13:49.620 So I could have a party.

00:13:51.820 Say, hey, everybody.

00:13:55.140 So maybe I'll win that next cycle.

00:13:59.440 Well, as you know, studies say that liberal women have the most mental illness. 1.00

00:14:04.060 Did you know that?

00:14:05.660 Yeah.

00:14:06.460 Liberal women have the highest rate of mental illness. 0.93

00:14:09.500 I wonder what their favorite sources of news are.

00:14:14.240 I believe it would be TikTok and MSNBC.

00:14:18.960 And also they have the highest level of mental illness.

00:14:23.040 Well, that's probably a total coincidence.

00:14:25.720 Speaking of batshit crazy MSNBC.

00:14:28.960 Now, I say this not just as a joke, even though it's funny.

00:14:32.960 After the Super Tuesday win of Trump, how many of you said, oh, I got to see what MSNBC is doing?

00:14:41.900 I'm not the only one, right?

00:14:44.120 You had to see their meltdown.

00:14:46.800 Oh, my God, it was funny.

00:14:49.760 Watching Joy Reid meltdown and racial mad now, it was just crazy.

00:14:59.620 You should see the body language.

00:15:01.240 There were at least three women whose bodies contorted into, like, witch-like creatures as they talked. 1.00

00:15:09.480 Did you watch it?

00:15:10.680 So, like, here would be a normal person talking.

00:15:13.740 Well, we're very unhappy because we wish somebody else had done better in the primary.

00:15:20.060 But Donald Trump had an unusually good day.

00:15:23.400 So that would be one way to cover it.

00:15:25.660 Here's how the three golems covered it. 1.00

00:15:29.300 Well, Trump, who's really responsible for?

00:15:38.420 And then there were words as well.

00:15:43.540 But mostly, you could watch the show with the sound turned off and just watch them be in full cognitive stress.

00:15:52.980 So whatever world they've created for themselves and then inserted themselves into that hellscape, it must be pretty bad in there.

00:16:02.600 Like, their bodies are actually tortured by whatever's going on in their heads.

00:16:08.920 Now, I'd also like to make a wardrobe suggestion for Rachel Maddow.

00:16:18.520 I don't usually make wardrobe recommendations.

00:16:22.180 But I don't know if you noticed, she was wearing a plunging neckline, and she also has a long, very nice neck. 0.96

00:16:30.360 She actually has very nice features.

00:16:32.300 But the head to neck to chest created a disturbing amount of nudity for a new show.

00:16:44.860 Did anybody else have that impression?

00:16:47.040 It's like, wow.

00:16:48.460 I'm just trying to watch you talk about the news, but I see way too much of your body.

00:16:53.280 Nobody had that?

00:16:57.600 Now, this has nothing to do with their gender preference or anything like that, in case you're wondering.

00:17:03.960 No, it's just purely a fashion thing.

00:17:06.100 It was really, ugh.

00:17:08.140 There was just something gross about it.

00:17:09.640 There was just too much skin.

00:17:11.200 And by the way, to be fair, if any man had been reading the news showing that much of the man's body,

00:17:18.760 I'd be the same reaction.

00:17:21.280 So it has nothing to do with her gender or preference or anything like that.

00:17:25.300 Just way too much skin.

00:17:27.420 Anyway, Trump heir, Joy Reid, was the funniest one.

00:17:32.100 Just total meltdown.

00:17:33.300 And she had some just so bad shit crazy stuff.

00:17:37.000 She went on a complete meltdown about how Trump only had one crisis to deal with in his presidency.

00:17:44.080 Just one.

00:17:45.640 He just had one crisis.

00:17:47.820 Just one.

00:17:49.420 COVID.

00:17:49.920 Just one.

00:17:51.280 He only had one thing to deal with, and he bollocksed it up.

00:17:55.480 Now, is that the way you handle the biggest pandemic of our lifetime?

00:18:03.860 It's just that one thing?

00:18:05.680 He only had one thing to do, and he got it wrong?

00:18:08.960 I really feel like...

00:18:10.620 Come on.

00:18:12.300 I'm seeing a very funny...

00:18:13.680 I'm seeing a very funny meme on the locals' comments because they can put photos in their comments.

00:18:26.080 I wish I could share it with you, but it's cruel.

00:18:30.280 I couldn't possibly do it.

00:18:34.620 Anyway, yeah.

00:18:36.160 Imagine treating COVID like it was a normal thing, and then they try to deal with discussing the economy, which none of them understand, and trying to make it sound like the pandemic was somehow not an important part of the Trump economic story.

00:18:59.980 I mean, the whole thing is just crazy and stupid, and it just gets worse and worse, and don't know how to compare anything.

00:19:08.440 I'll give you some examples here in a minute.

00:19:10.560 So, you know, there are pundits who are saying that the economy is great.

00:19:18.600 So the economy is great, and why don't people understand that, you know, jobs are good, the stock market's up, inflation rate has come down.

00:19:28.300 You know, we all understand that the pandemic was part of that as well.

00:19:33.000 And it basically looks like everything's good, and the MSNBC people were trying to understand that.

00:19:39.940 Like, why aren't people understanding that if they're paying more, see, we don't understand that.

00:19:47.020 People are paying way more for food and way more for gas, but why don't they understand that the numbers that we're giving them show that it's not happening?

00:19:58.180 Like, why don't they understand that?

00:19:59.860 And they act confused that people don't understand that when they're paying more for gas and food, that they should be more influenced not by what they're actually paying, and how they know it's way more than it used to be, but that there's a statistic showing that if you pick the right starting point, and you look at rate instead of amount, technically, it's really good.

00:20:25.420 That was their argument.

00:20:27.420 That was their argument.

00:20:28.900 Okay.

00:20:31.260 But here are the good things that Biden has done.

00:20:34.460 I asked this question before, so I got an answer.

00:20:36.840 Here are the good things that he did that were listed as positives, things that really made a difference.

00:20:43.220 There's the infrastructure bill, which, I don't know.

00:20:48.580 Are any of you making a little more money because of the infrastructure bill?

00:20:56.900 I've been waiting for the indication that that's making a difference.

00:21:02.420 I'm not aware of anything that anybody's building anywhere, but okay.

00:21:07.920 At least there was a bill that got passed.

00:21:09.760 I'll give them that.

00:21:10.960 I mean, we probably needed the infrastructure.

00:21:12.460 Then, apparently, Joe Biden negotiated lower pharmaceutical costs.

00:21:22.720 Lower pharmaceutical costs.

00:21:24.500 Have any of you seen lower pharmaceutical costs?

00:21:28.140 Has anybody seen that?

00:21:30.180 I didn't even know that happened.

00:21:32.320 What exactly is this story about lower pharmaceutical costs?

00:21:36.480 I have no idea that any of that happened or that I'm paying less.

00:21:41.440 Am I?

00:21:42.460 Is there something that will happen in the future?

00:21:46.020 What kind of meds is he talking about?

00:21:49.140 And wasn't Trump going to do the same thing?

00:21:52.060 I don't know.

00:21:53.520 So we don't know much about that.

00:21:55.680 Then, apparently, Biden tried to lower credit card fees.

00:22:00.860 Did that happen in the real world?

00:22:03.220 Did anybody's credit card fees go down?

00:22:06.520 I mean, I haven't noticed.

00:22:07.900 But then they didn't mention, but they could have.

00:22:12.980 Just think about this.

00:22:14.400 Even the pundits didn't mention shrinkflation.

00:22:19.600 Even his biggest supporters weren't willing to get on the bandwagon with,

00:22:24.420 you don't have enough snacks.

00:22:25.940 They're staying away from that, which is hilarious because it's like his main theme at the moment.

00:22:32.320 It's the only thing he can talk about and remember is what he was going to say.

00:22:35.560 So here's what I say.

00:22:40.060 So the MSNBC take is that the economy is basically good everywhere,

00:22:46.140 but one of the pundits did say, you know, there's some inflation and there's some debt.

00:22:53.360 Now, here's what that sounds like to me.

00:22:57.960 If your take on the economy is that everything looks good except the impossible-to-ever-pay-back debt,

00:23:05.500 that's not an economic opinion.

00:23:09.720 Now, that's a confession that you should never talk about the economy in public.

00:23:15.700 Do you know what it sounds like if you say all the numbers are good, the GDP is good, the jobs are good?

00:23:22.100 But the only problem is $35 trillion that we can't pay back.

00:23:28.460 That's the only problem.

00:23:30.460 Do you know what that sounds like?

00:23:33.080 O.J. Simpson only had one bad day.

00:23:37.200 That's what that sounds like.

00:23:39.040 Do you know what that sounds like?

00:23:41.700 Lahaina in Maui is great, except for no buildings.

00:23:46.780 They're all ashes.

00:23:48.160 But otherwise, excellent.

00:23:50.140 It's a really good vacation and destination if you like ashes.

00:23:56.180 That's what that sounds like.

00:23:58.780 Here's what they don't seem to understand.

00:24:01.720 Do you know what helps the GDP?

00:24:04.580 Borrowing too much money.

00:24:06.600 Do you know what helps your employment?

00:24:09.780 Borrowing too much money.

00:24:12.420 Right?

00:24:12.560 The things that look good are because we borrowed too much money.

00:24:18.020 And then we're doing better than all the other countries, which apparently seems to be true if you ignore $35 trillion in debt.

00:24:28.300 So if you don't know that all of the other numbers are looking good because you did this one catastrophic thing that will kill us all, I don't know if it will, but it looks bad.

00:24:40.660 I suspect we'll figure a way out, but I don't know if that will be.

00:24:45.540 Something about digital money, something about inflating it away.

00:24:49.540 Now, I did hear one opinion that I've been thinking about for a while, a way to understand the national debt.

00:24:56.240 You all know the national debt is not like a mortgage, right?

00:24:59.960 It's not like a regular debt.

00:25:01.640 And somebody pointed out, and I've been just mulling this because I don't think it's completely right, but it might be partly right.

00:25:12.320 And it's that the debt pays for itself as soon as it's issued.

00:25:19.500 Meaning that all we did is reduce the amount, the value of the money that was already out there by $35 trillion.

00:25:27.780 Does that make sense economically?

00:25:30.280 That the debt is paid for upon issuance by making all of our other money worth less.

00:25:38.000 So it's the value that was in all the other money that was already out there that is sort of taken up and absorbed by the debt.

00:25:48.040 I don't know if that quite handles the whole situation, but it's different than mortgage, right?

00:25:55.120 If you get a mortgage, you owe the money.

00:25:58.540 But if they inflate everything else away, you know, they can inflate it away.

00:26:06.020 They can make it go away if they want in a very bad way.

00:26:08.680 It's essentially just a tax that looks like inflation.

00:26:13.420 All right, here's a dog now barking.

00:26:15.400 Is it my imagination, or has the Trump campaign been flawless?

00:26:22.920 Have I missed anything?

00:26:25.420 I think the Trump campaign has been maybe one of the best I've ever seen.

00:26:31.080 And it's just so quietly perfect that you don't notice how good it is.

00:26:37.060 Have you noticed that his discipline, his message discipline, is unprecedented?

00:26:45.660 Trump's message discipline, which was really the thing, the one thing that would guarantee a victory, just message discipline, he hasn't.

00:26:53.760 Now, I don't know why.

00:26:55.780 It could be that he just competes to win, and he knows he has to do it, so he's just doing it.

00:27:00.300 It could be just that.

00:27:01.160 It could be that he has better advisors.

00:27:04.640 All indications are that he's getting better advice.

00:27:08.740 Vivek would be at the top of the list.

00:27:10.640 But lots of other, you know, I'm sure plenty of other good advice.

00:27:15.880 But you have to give him credit for taking good advice.

00:27:20.320 Right?

00:27:20.940 You don't give the credit to the advisors.

00:27:23.340 That's not how anything works.

00:27:24.660 The boss still has to decide whose advice to take, has to decide who's going to be giving the advice.

00:27:31.520 So the boss always gets the credit, even if the advice is good.

00:27:34.460 That's just the way it has to work.

00:27:36.720 So, yeah.

00:27:37.820 To me, it looks like he's handling 91 indictments at the same time he's running one of the best political campaigns I've ever seen.

00:27:44.900 And it reminded me of Ginger Rogers, the dance partner for Fred Astaire, who famously said, you know, Fred Astaire got all the attention for being the great dancer.

00:27:56.800 But his dance partner, who danced with him, had to dance backwards and in high heels. 0.99

00:28:04.040 So that's sort of the old joke.

00:28:05.700 She did the same moves, but backwards and high heels. 1.00

00:28:08.180 And it feels like that's what Trump's doing.

00:28:10.640 He's doing the best campaign at the same time he's handling all the lawfare, 91 indictments.

00:28:16.880 So somehow he's made the indictments just part of his campaign.

00:28:23.320 And it's weird because I think the campaign is paying his legal bills.

00:28:26.860 Is that true?

00:28:28.540 The campaign is paying the legal bills?

00:28:31.140 Do we have a confirmation on that?

00:28:33.320 I don't know if that's completely true or even legal.

00:28:36.340 I think it is.

00:28:38.180 But to me, that's a good expense.

00:28:41.820 That's a campaign expense.

00:28:43.500 Because he's made the legal battle a key part of the messaging.

00:28:49.580 And yeah, I think the campaign should absolutely pay for it.

00:28:53.120 I think it's legal.

00:28:56.980 How many of you have ever done this?

00:28:59.500 Do any of you write Trump fan fiction in your head?

00:29:02.940 Am I the only one where I imagine something that only he could do that there's no other politician that you'd even consider?

00:29:12.300 But I have a fan fiction in my head that he's never going to do, but he's the only person who ever could.

00:29:19.720 And that's what makes it fun.

00:29:20.760 I want you to imagine the scene.

00:29:23.120 And again, I'm not recommending it.

00:29:25.100 I'm not predicting it.

00:29:26.620 I'm not recommending it just for fun.

00:29:29.260 This is literally Trump fan fiction.

00:29:31.980 It's an inner city.

00:29:37.460 Limousines pull up unexpectedly.

00:29:40.500 Press doesn't expect it.

00:29:42.660 Nobody expects it at the destination.

00:29:45.340 The destination is a black barbershop.

00:29:48.060 Maybe not even in the safest part of town.

00:29:52.400 But he's got plenty of secret service.

00:29:56.020 Trump gets out of his limo.

00:29:58.860 And the only press that's there is no press.

00:30:04.420 The only people there are campaign staff and citizens who have their own phones.

00:30:10.780 It's not planned.

00:30:12.220 He just gets out of the car and walks into a black barbershop.

00:30:18.980 Everything stops because everybody recognizes them.

00:30:22.860 And of course, the secret service are there.

00:30:24.880 And everything stops.

00:30:26.740 And people start taking out their phones.

00:30:30.540 And his own campaign, they'd have their phones out too.

00:30:35.520 And then he says he wants a haircut.

00:30:39.220 And then he waits his turn.

00:30:41.600 He just waits his turn.

00:30:43.780 Like, let's say there are three people in front of him.

00:30:46.500 So he just sits down.

00:30:48.060 He just waits his turn.

00:30:49.460 And then he gets in a conversation, because you know a conversation would start.

00:30:55.160 And then he gets in the chair.

00:30:56.540 And people are talking to him and asking him questions.

00:31:01.180 He's using his famous Trump charisma.

00:31:04.080 How do you think they would treat him?

00:31:05.520 And even if they were totally anti-Trump, if he walks in your door, in your barbershop, and says to you, I'm not allowing the press in here, but you're welcome to use your own phones if you want to take some photos.

00:31:23.180 Everybody pulls out their phone.

00:31:25.540 Suddenly, Trump made every single person who just happened to be in the barbershop by chance, he turned every one of them into a social media star.

00:31:35.840 They all have phones.

00:31:37.540 They all pulled them out.

00:31:39.400 Everyone who posts that video online is going to get 10 million views.

00:31:42.780 Every one of them, every person there, is going to get 10 million views on their social media for free.

00:31:51.200 It's just a gift.

00:31:52.420 So then he gets in the chair.

00:31:55.620 Here's the good part.

00:31:57.860 He says, give me the Charles Barkley.

00:32:02.920 Right?

00:32:04.340 Shave it all off.

00:32:06.680 Imagine, if you will, watching 20 different home video cameras of Trump sitting in the chair, answering questions,

00:32:19.820 like in his usual funny, charismatic way, while they shaved his head.

00:32:29.720 Just imagine, while they shaved his head.

00:32:35.340 Then he walks out looking like Daddy Warbucks, and he wins the black vote. 0.87

00:32:42.300 Now, you're going to say to me, Scott, how racist that you would dismiss the entire black voting bloc like they're going to vote for him because of sneakers,

00:32:54.220 or they're going to vote for him because he has some legal risk,

00:32:58.400 or they're going to vote for him just because he got a haircut at a black barbershop.

00:33:03.580 No, I'm not saying that.

00:33:05.780 I'm saying that would be a show of respect.

00:33:13.660 That's it.

00:33:15.600 That's the winning play.

00:33:17.780 A show of respect.

00:33:19.900 But it would be genuine.

00:33:21.460 I mean, obviously, it would be a blatant political prank.

00:33:25.000 But if you actually sat there and got your head shaved,

00:33:27.200 that is a show of humility, it's a show of respect, it's a show of trust.

00:33:36.100 You know, even with the Secret Service there, there's some trust.

00:33:39.580 Because unless they're doing a full body cavity search of everybody who's there,

00:33:44.680 there's some trust, right?

00:33:46.640 Even with the people with guns standing nearby, there's still some trust involved.

00:33:49.620 Now, again, I'm not recommending it.

00:33:53.960 He's not going to do that.

00:33:55.480 You know, his hair is iconic, and I'm sure he'll keep it.

00:33:59.460 But am I right that it's just great fan fiction?

00:34:04.020 Did you enjoy it just as an imaginary story?

00:34:09.340 I don't know.

00:34:10.160 For some reason, he's the only politician I've ever written fan fiction for in my head,

00:34:14.600 just because he could pull it off.

00:34:16.440 Anyway, China's gross domestic product may have been overstated,

00:34:24.440 according to the Wall Street Journal.

00:34:26.960 Wow.

00:34:28.480 China's GDP is overstated.

00:34:31.620 You know, I'm starting to think we can't trust their data.

00:34:37.880 I don't know.

00:34:38.600 Keep an eye on this.

00:34:39.660 But starting to get just that hint, you know,

00:34:43.020 a little whiff of maybe their economic data is not as credible as I used to think it was.

00:34:50.480 Well, it's a good thing that in America, we don't have that problem.

00:34:55.900 We don't have the problem of just making up data and trying to sell it to the world, huh?

00:35:01.800 Thank goodness you live in America.

00:35:03.340 Paul Krugman is a famous economist, is showing a, there's a great drop in violent crime.

00:35:12.760 And he makes a good point, he says, on X platform.

00:35:16.740 He says, Trump seems to be doubling down on the, quote, scary brown people are terrorizing our cities.

00:35:23.080 Meanwhile, here's what the FBI says.

00:35:25.280 He says, it's 2023 numbers and the third quarter.

00:35:30.440 And it said that the violent crime is way down.

00:35:33.600 So the third quarter of 2023, violent crime, way down.

00:35:38.640 Is he right?

00:35:41.920 Is he right?

00:35:44.640 Is there anything missing from the story?

00:35:48.940 What's missing?

00:35:51.620 How about the reason?

00:35:53.880 What's the reason?

00:35:57.120 He left out the reason.

00:35:59.740 Feels like that's the most important part.

00:36:02.640 A sudden and unexpected drop in violent crime.

00:36:08.400 Why?

00:36:09.700 Well, I've got some theories.

00:36:11.560 I think the violent crime went down because there are fewer police officers.

00:36:18.480 Oh, no, probably not that.

00:36:20.260 No, it's because there are more migrants.

00:36:23.880 No, that doesn't make sense.

00:36:27.560 Unless they're actually preventing other people from doing crimes.

00:36:31.360 No, that doesn't make sense.

00:36:33.140 So, is it, what is it?

00:36:39.120 Does anybody have an idea?

00:36:40.480 Is it that the fentanyl killed so many people that there's nobody left to kill anybody?

00:36:47.540 Is it that they, maybe, maybe our crime data is no better than China's GDP data?

00:36:55.660 Is it possible that the data is bullshit?

00:36:59.040 Is it possible that, now, remember, you have to make a distinction between violent crime and the stuff that they're not prosecuting.

00:37:08.940 I don't think they're not prosecuting, or at least arresting, violent crime.

00:37:14.640 We agree on that?

00:37:18.360 The people who are just not getting arrested are the thieves, for the most part.

00:37:24.740 And that wouldn't show up.

00:37:26.520 And, by the way, if 50 people rob a Target store so badly that Target closes all their stores, one crime.

00:37:36.360 That's just one crime.

00:37:37.540 So, some of it's probably in the data, but that's not what's happening for the violent crime.

00:37:44.780 As far as I know, if you report the crime, it shows up as a statistic.

00:37:48.880 It doesn't have to be solved, and it doesn't matter what happens to the perpetrator, whether they go free or not.

00:37:54.740 It's still crime, right?

00:37:56.600 So, isn't this one of the biggest mysteries in the country?

00:38:01.440 Can you give me any reason that there would be a sudden drop in violent crime?

00:38:05.620 It's not just because the pandemic's over, is it?

00:38:09.240 Or is it?

00:38:10.020 Maybe it is.

00:38:12.140 All right.

00:38:14.560 So, Biden did his dementia anger thing when asked about the polls, and he said,

00:38:22.960 my poll numbers, the last five polls, you guys don't report.

00:38:26.580 I'm winning five, five in a row.

00:38:29.960 Just imagine that with, like, dementia anger.

00:38:32.760 Now, where's Daniel Dale, the fact-checker?

00:38:40.120 Did the fact-checkers fact-check that?

00:38:43.320 And here's the other thing I wonder.

00:38:46.480 Is it possible he doesn't know he's behind in the polls?

00:38:50.100 He might not know.

00:38:52.100 Because he only knows what people tell him.

00:38:54.040 I doubt he's doing a lot of reading.

00:38:55.160 Okay, I'm seeing the comments.

00:39:01.880 Soros DAs are dismissing more crimes.

00:39:05.800 That has nothing to do with violent crimes.

00:39:08.540 I'm sure they're not dismissing violent crimes.

00:39:13.320 Now, I'll take a fact-check on that.

00:39:15.200 If you say they are, I'll be amazed.

00:39:18.080 But dismissing?

00:39:19.640 They might be lowering what it is, but I don't think they're dismissing.

00:39:22.800 All right, so I'm seeing people saying that, yes, they're dismissing violent crime.

00:39:29.080 Dismissing.

00:39:30.820 Not just downrating it or letting people out on bail, but dismissing.

00:39:38.140 All right, I'm going to call bullshit on that.

00:39:39.720 I'm seeing a stream of people who believe that that's happening.

00:39:47.260 But I'll take a fact-check.

00:39:49.100 So I'm open to you being right.

00:39:51.420 I'm not going to fight you if you've got a source.

00:39:53.840 But I think you're probably conflating the violent crime and the non-violent crime.

00:39:59.940 Give me a fact-check on that.

00:40:02.000 All right?

00:40:02.240 But don't send me more data about non-violent crime and say that you made your case, because

00:40:07.700 I know that's happening.

00:40:09.560 All right?

00:40:10.020 So there's some difference of opinion on whether the Soros DAs are letting violent crimes be

00:40:17.420 just not counted as crimes.

00:40:19.560 I say that's not really happening in the real world.

00:40:21.980 But many of you, a lot of people, are saying, oh, absolutely, that's happening.

00:40:28.080 So I'll take a fact-check.

00:40:30.000 This is why I love doing this live.

00:40:32.900 Isn't this so much better than if I just said that and then you watch the show and you're

00:40:37.000 like, oh, I got that wrong.

00:40:38.320 Nobody fact-checked him.

00:40:39.980 So I don't know who's right.

00:40:41.820 But just note there's a disagreement on that fact.

00:40:47.200 All right.

00:40:47.760 But tonight, apparently, Biden will be doing his hate of the union message.

00:40:55.840 I call it the hate of the union because now the bad guys have signaled what they're going

00:41:01.420 to do.

00:41:01.780 They're going to use the following words.

00:41:03.620 Chaos, extreme, darkness, existential Trump threat, and dictator.

00:41:10.380 And also end of democracy.

00:41:13.200 So those are the brainwashing words.

00:41:15.000 Chaos, extreme, darkness, existential threat, Trump dictator, et cetera.

00:41:21.820 Or, as Hakeem Jeffries, House Minority Leader, said that they do nothing Republicans like their

00:41:33.220 chaos and dysfunction and extremism.

00:41:36.840 Chaos and dysfunction and extremism.

00:41:41.520 Chaos, dysfunction, extremism.

00:41:43.800 Oh, my.

00:41:45.180 Chaos, dysfunction, extremism.

00:41:47.260 Oh, my.

00:41:48.260 Chaos, dysfunction, extremism.

00:41:50.720 Oh, my.

00:41:52.860 Wizard Vaz.

00:41:54.640 Dorothy.

00:41:56.660 So I say it's time to turn on the mockery canons and embrace all of these ridiculous brainwashing

00:42:04.180 intelligence agency words.

00:42:06.560 And just do the Dorothy thing every time you see them.

00:42:09.900 Chaos, dysfunction, extremism.

00:42:12.280 Oh, my.

00:42:13.720 Hey, is Trump under your bed with his chaos and extremism?

00:42:19.120 MAGA.

00:42:19.980 Extreme MAGA's going to get you.

00:42:23.020 Well, I think it's funny.

00:42:24.540 All right.

00:42:26.080 All right.

00:42:31.000 So let's see.

00:42:32.380 Let's some of the extremism that the Democrats are talking about is this is pretty extreme.

00:42:40.420 There are Republicans who think you shouldn't kill your baby if it's nine months in the womb

00:42:45.200 already.

00:42:45.880 They think you shouldn't transition your kid to another gender.

00:42:51.580 Maybe they think you shouldn't be spending so much in Ukraine.

00:42:54.480 It depends which Republicans you're talking to.

00:42:57.320 But it really sort of opens the question of what extreme means.

00:43:02.080 Would extreme be opening the border to 10 million strangers?

00:43:07.160 To me, that sounds a little bit extreme.

00:43:09.280 So anyway, we can see their whole play now, and it's pretty obvious.

00:43:15.580 You should also know that any news story you see from now until Election Day is probably

00:43:20.500 a presidential news story in disguise.

00:43:24.540 Let's see if you recognize these.

00:43:26.500 These are presidential stories that don't look like it.

00:43:32.260 So NBC News, I think it was NBC, maybe it was somebody else, had a report that electric

00:43:38.860 cars are worse for the environment than regular cars.

00:43:44.700 Now, do you think if it were not a race between Biden and Trump, and if Elon Musk were not one

00:43:54.520 of the most important voices in politics at the moment, do you think a major news entity,

00:44:00.640 which always leans left and they like their green stuff, do you think that they would be

00:44:04.720 ragging on electric cars?

00:44:06.200 Do you think that would happen in a non-election year in which Musk was not a player?

00:44:13.720 I don't think so.

00:44:15.300 I think they would have spiked that story, and they'd say, no, no, we like electric cars

00:44:19.880 because we've got to save the climate.

00:44:23.280 But in an election year, oh, fuck those electric cars, am I right?

00:44:27.280 Now, to me, that looks purely like an attack on Musk, because you can see that it's an all—Biden

00:44:34.700 likes to talk about this all-government approach.

00:44:37.880 Well, there looks to be an all-government approach to attack Elon Musk, because he's attacked

00:44:42.560 legally, politically, in the news, and these are all entities that the Democrats control

00:44:48.520 directly or indirectly.

00:44:49.700 So you should see that as a political story in a political year.

00:44:56.680 NBC-BLK.

00:44:58.700 What the heck is NBC-BLK?

00:45:01.500 Because the story is about black Americans.

00:45:03.560 Is there such a thing as a black NBC? 0.78

00:45:07.320 Or does BLK stand for something that is obvious and I don't know what it is?

00:45:11.380 Anyway, somebody named NBC-BLK reported that in the U.S., black women are six times more 1.00

00:45:18.820 likely to be killed than their white counterpoints. 0.76

00:45:22.020 Now, that sounds like a story of somebody who wants to drum up some racial animosity during

00:45:27.740 an election year.

00:45:29.960 Now, is there anything left out of that story?

00:45:33.800 Is there anything you'd like to know about the fact that black women are, tragically, 1.00

00:45:38.560 six times more likely to be killed than their white counterpoints?

00:45:44.100 Well, end-wokeness, once again, for the win, the end-wokeness account, fills in the context

00:45:52.220 for us.

00:45:53.520 Ninety-three percent of those black women are killed by black men.

00:45:58.600 Now, some might suggest that black women should try to get away from the black men, but that's 1.00

00:46:05.540 pretty hard to do.

00:46:06.260 And some might say that this is purely a political story, and you never would have seen it except

00:46:15.420 that it's a political season.

00:46:17.420 Maybe.

00:46:18.620 Don't know.

00:46:22.440 I saw even on CNN, Jake Tapper was making sure that people understood that Trump was getting

00:46:31.180 a lot more of the black male vote.

00:46:35.740 The black male vote.

00:46:37.840 So, do you think that's happening?

00:46:42.080 Because now it's even a thing.

00:46:45.120 So, the fact that CNN and Jake Tapper would inject it into a conversation where he didn't

00:46:52.060 need to.

00:46:53.120 So, actually, that's the part that caught my attention.

00:46:55.200 He didn't need to inject it.

00:46:57.920 It mattered.

00:46:59.500 But he wanted to make sure that his viewers knew that black men, not women, but black men

00:47:05.460 seemed to be moving more toward Trump than people expected.

00:47:08.480 Now, I feel that that puts it into the narrative, because the Republicans and Fox News can say

00:47:18.420 it all day long, and nobody hears it on the other side.

00:47:22.380 But if CNN says it, it starts to become a narrative.

00:47:26.440 And what happens if the narrative reaches black men?

00:47:30.860 What if black men start hearing that other black men are becoming more pro-Trump?

00:47:38.780 Would that have an effect?

00:47:40.020 It should.

00:47:41.080 Because we're all herd instinct animals, so you like your social proofs.

00:47:45.960 You like other people like you to be doing things, and you're likely to copy them.

00:47:52.900 Anyway.

00:47:55.720 So, I think that's really happening.

00:47:58.840 We'll see how much.

00:48:00.860 There is a new bipartisan bill to ban TikTok in Congress.

00:48:06.700 I think it'll fail, but I think it will tell us everything we need to know about who's in charge

00:48:12.680 and what the priorities are.

00:48:16.860 So, I think that it will fail, because either there are people who want to use it for politics,

00:48:22.860 there'll be some people like that.

00:48:24.380 But I think it's going to just show us who's running the country.

00:48:27.160 I think that the reason for TikTok is that maybe our own intelligence people are already in it as well as China.

00:48:36.620 It could be that our intelligence services use it just like they would use other platforms to influence America somehow.

00:48:45.960 So, it could be that China isn't the only one using TikTok to influence Americans.

00:48:51.220 It could be our own intelligence service using all of the platforms the same way.

00:48:56.360 Now, how could they influence that?

00:48:58.560 Well, simply by having super users.

00:49:00.460 You know, if they had users who were getting big accounts sort of miraculously.

00:49:07.500 And I'm sure they could artificially make an account bigger if they wanted to.

00:49:10.800 So, I think that we're going to learn from who says no.

00:49:16.560 I wouldn't pay attention to, let's say, a Thomas Massey or a Rand Paul wanting to keep, or at least not wanting to ban it,

00:49:24.280 because they're the freedom absolutists.

00:49:27.780 So, the absolutists are just don't ban things, let the market work it out.

00:49:32.980 And I can respect that point of view.

00:49:36.540 I don't mind that that exists.

00:49:39.460 But for the rest of the people, you might find out more than you thought you knew, thought you were going to find out.

00:49:45.480 All right, apparently Canada has made, I'm a little unclear on the timing,

00:49:50.140 has made or is about to make thought crimes a crime,

00:49:54.120 so that if you suspected somebody might say something bad about you that would be a hate crime in your opinion,

00:50:00.200 they can go to jail for life.

00:50:02.980 For life.

00:50:07.020 For life.

00:50:09.900 Not for saying something, but for being accused of maybe going to say something in the future

00:50:15.400 that somebody would interpret as a hate crime.

00:50:19.880 That's actually real.

00:50:23.880 You can actually see the language in the bill.

00:50:27.500 It doesn't have to be an actual crime that happened.

00:50:30.200 They can lock you up for life under the suspicion that you might say something in the future.

00:50:38.240 No, I'm not kidding.

00:50:39.660 I swear to God, I'm not kidding.

00:50:45.140 It actually says that.

00:50:47.300 In direct words that you can't misinterpret.

00:50:50.940 It's very clear.

00:50:51.700 It's not even legalese.

00:50:53.080 Just direct words.

00:50:55.080 Pre-crime.

00:50:55.540 So, yeah, wow.

00:51:01.980 So, B.J. Dichter, I hope I pronounced his last name right, D-I-C-H-T-E-R, is it Dichter?

00:51:08.620 Does anybody know the proper pronunciation?

00:51:12.380 Dichter or Dichter?

00:51:13.980 Dichter, maybe?

00:51:15.180 If it were my name, I'd probably say Dichter, but I don't know.

00:51:20.040 Anyway, you remember him from the Canadian truckers protest.

00:51:26.440 So, he's talking to us about this.

00:51:29.600 All right.

00:51:30.480 Musk is worried about maybe another 9-11, a terrorist attack,

00:51:34.960 and he's quite concerned about the fact that the Biden administration

00:51:39.040 apparently flew in over 300,000 people, some say,

00:51:44.040 so they didn't show up in the statistics.

00:51:46.300 So, I think it's very obvious now, as Musk points out,

00:51:49.720 that the administration is not trying to stop people.

00:51:52.760 They're trying to bring them in, as many as they can, 0.96

00:51:55.640 and it looks like for the purpose of converting them into voters

00:51:58.640 so they can control the country. 0.61

00:52:02.080 So, Musk, you know, is worried that with that many people coming in

00:52:07.840 without enough regulate, you know, enough checking, I guess.

00:52:11.220 Some could be terrorists, and we're probably in for some kind of a terrorist attack.

00:52:15.540 Now, I'm going to disagree.

00:52:19.060 I don't like to disagree with Elon Musk.

00:52:21.280 Usually, I agree.

00:52:22.620 But I think he's totally wrong here.

00:52:24.060 I wouldn't worry, if I were you,

00:52:26.060 I would not worry about a 9-11 attack 0.99

00:52:28.420 unless some other things happen that would indicate it's likely, right?

00:52:34.700 For example, I wouldn't worry about a 9-11 attack

00:52:37.380 unless Trump had a commanding lead in the polls.

00:52:44.340 Or unless, and probably it'd have to happen at the same time.

00:52:47.740 I mean, this would really scare me.

00:52:49.120 Imagine if Victoria Nuland, 0.98

00:52:52.320 our most famous country overthrower,

00:52:54.660 the coup plotter who's in Ukraine,

00:52:57.520 unless she decided to come back to America 0.99

00:52:59.940 and work on the Biden campaign,

00:53:02.680 I wouldn't worry at all about any kind of...

00:53:06.680 Oh, she is. She is. 0.67

00:53:08.660 Oh, she is coming back to America. 0.69

00:53:11.200 The most famous coup plotter

00:53:13.120 is coming back to America to work on Biden's campaign?

00:53:16.940 Huh.

00:53:17.860 At the same time that

00:53:19.160 Trump has a commanding lead in the polls,

00:53:22.520 almost suggesting that the only way

00:53:24.220 that Biden could win

00:53:25.460 would be some kind of combination of dirty tricks

00:53:28.500 like we play on 80 other countries so far,

00:53:31.520 including Ukraine.

00:53:33.580 So Victoria Nuland's coming back

00:53:34.980 at exactly the same time

00:53:36.700 as Trump has commanding lead,

00:53:40.180 and there seems like no other way

00:53:42.180 Biden could win

00:53:43.600 unless there was some kind of

00:53:44.920 coup or something.

00:53:47.740 But I wouldn't worry about that.

00:53:48.920 So you don't have to worry about...

00:53:52.080 You know, I'm just exaggerating, obviously.

00:53:54.060 You don't have to worry about a coup.

00:53:56.220 You don't have to worry about a 9-11 type attack.

00:54:00.380 Unless, if you started hearing

00:54:02.980 that the Biden campaign

00:54:04.680 was saying that Trump was,

00:54:07.340 for example,

00:54:08.700 an existential threat to democracy.

00:54:11.800 If you heard that

00:54:13.140 at the same time

00:54:15.160 Trump had a commanding lead,

00:54:17.420 at the same time

00:54:19.440 Victoria Nuland,

00:54:21.060 the greatest coup person,

00:54:23.360 was brought to work

00:54:24.360 on the Biden campaign,

00:54:25.740 well, those signals

00:54:27.140 would pretty much guarantee

00:54:28.640 you'd see a terrorist attack.

00:54:33.220 So, anyway.

00:54:36.920 Adam Schiff

00:54:38.000 and Steve Garvey,

00:54:40.560 ex-baseball player, Republican,

00:54:42.680 voted for Trump twice.

00:54:44.220 They were the top two

00:54:46.740 vote-getters yesterday,

00:54:47.800 which means they have a run-off.

00:54:49.900 Now,

00:54:50.760 the news is so broken.

00:54:54.100 I...

00:54:54.720 Let me see if I have this right.

00:54:57.980 So it was a...

00:54:59.400 You know,

00:54:59.660 there were several people

00:55:00.440 in the primary.

00:55:01.760 The Democrat votes

00:55:03.100 were split

00:55:04.140 between

00:55:06.280 Schiff

00:55:07.420 and a couple other

00:55:08.600 strong candidates.

00:55:11.220 Under the condition

00:55:12.100 that Schiff

00:55:12.720 was getting,

00:55:13.540 you know,

00:55:13.960 not the full set

00:55:14.960 of Democrat votes,

00:55:16.460 he still beat Garvey

00:55:17.880 by only a little bit.

00:55:20.420 You know,

00:55:20.740 statistical tie,

00:55:21.820 basically.

00:55:24.760 Why isn't your news

00:55:26.120 telling you

00:55:26.920 that Garvey

00:55:28.040 has no chance

00:55:28.880 whatsoever

00:55:29.440 in the general?

00:55:32.120 Why...

00:55:32.480 I feel like

00:55:33.160 that's the obvious

00:55:33.900 thing to say

00:55:34.580 because the nature

00:55:36.100 of the strange way

00:55:37.060 that California

00:55:37.760 does the things

00:55:38.680 where the last two people

00:55:39.840 always do a run-off.

00:55:41.760 It guarantees

00:55:42.740 that the Republican

00:55:43.700 loses,

00:55:45.220 doesn't it?

00:55:46.140 So it guarantees

00:55:46.960 that the lone Republican

00:55:48.360 should look good

00:55:49.620 in the primary

00:55:51.060 because there's

00:55:51.700 nobody else running,

00:55:53.100 but also should lose

00:55:54.760 like a dog

00:55:55.500 when all the Democrats

00:55:57.280 turn out to vote.

00:55:58.880 So am I missing something

00:56:00.540 or does Steve Garvey

00:56:01.780 really have no chance

00:56:02.740 whatsoever?

00:56:04.560 He has no chance,

00:56:05.680 right?

00:56:05.880 And the news

00:56:07.180 just sort of

00:56:07.880 doesn't act

00:56:09.560 as if that's a thing.

00:56:11.200 They're acting

00:56:11.680 like it's a contest

00:56:12.520 or something.

00:56:13.200 I don't think it is.

00:56:15.160 Anyway.

00:56:18.520 So we'll see.

00:56:20.320 If I were Garvey,

00:56:21.620 this is what I would do.

00:56:22.920 I would go after 0.88

00:56:23.640 Schiff for his hoaxes.

00:56:26.060 And even in losing,

00:56:27.840 I would do his service

00:56:28.740 for the country

00:56:29.460 by making sure

00:56:30.780 that the news

00:56:31.380 had to cover me

00:56:32.260 talking about

00:56:33.300 all of his hoaxes,

00:56:34.980 the Schiff hoaxes.

00:56:35.880 Now that would be

00:56:36.860 losing in style.

00:56:39.080 And I don't know

00:56:39.820 much about Steve Garvey,

00:56:40.860 but he looks like

00:56:41.400 a classy guy

00:56:42.300 who knows how

00:56:44.460 to play a game,

00:56:45.820 right?

00:56:46.440 Professional athlete.

00:56:47.560 He knows how

00:56:47.980 to play a game.

00:56:49.440 And I would guess

00:56:51.920 that he would find

00:56:54.160 some, let's say,

00:56:55.620 satisfaction

00:56:56.360 in helping

00:56:57.800 the narrative along

00:56:58.940 that's bad for Schiff

00:57:00.280 because I don't think

00:57:01.520 he wants to be

00:57:02.400 a senator

00:57:02.940 as much as he wants.

00:57:04.360 I'm just guessing.

00:57:05.060 I can't read his mind.

00:57:06.340 I don't think

00:57:06.760 Steve Garvey

00:57:07.420 wants to be a senator

00:57:08.900 at his current age

00:57:10.920 nearly as much

00:57:12.280 as he doesn't

00:57:12.920 want Schiff

00:57:13.400 to be the senator.

00:57:15.080 So he can at least

00:57:16.160 damage Schiff

00:57:17.260 in losing

00:57:19.140 if that's what happens.

00:57:21.140 And he could win

00:57:21.840 if he does

00:57:22.240 a good enough job

00:57:22.960 at the hoax debunking.

00:57:25.220 Facebook had a big

00:57:26.160 technical outage

00:57:27.460 in all of its

00:57:28.240 other products

00:57:28.840 like WhatsApp

00:57:29.480 and Instagram.

00:57:31.440 Nobody knows

00:57:32.940 exactly why.

00:57:34.880 Do they?

00:57:37.260 Does anybody know?

00:57:39.720 We don't know why,

00:57:40.620 right?

00:57:40.860 But it's kind of scary

00:57:41.700 if any major system

00:57:43.560 goes down.

00:57:45.980 All right.

00:57:47.400 Speaking of Thomas Massey,

00:57:49.580 he's one of those people

00:57:50.720 who actually reads

00:57:51.480 these omnibus bills,

00:57:52.900 this legislation

00:57:53.660 that's so complicated

00:57:54.600 and a million things

00:57:55.380 are in it.

00:57:55.780 And he said

00:57:56.920 that the lobbyists

00:57:59.160 hid this in it.

00:58:00.600 $15 million

00:58:01.540 for electronic tracking

00:58:04.140 of cattle

00:58:04.960 in the U.S.

00:58:08.280 Somehow the lobbyists

00:58:09.640 got $15 million

00:58:10.620 to track our cattle.

00:58:13.580 Now,

00:58:14.020 there's probably

00:58:14.520 some practical reason

00:58:15.840 to do that,

00:58:17.240 but

00:58:17.500 as Massey points out,

00:58:20.420 there's no law

00:58:21.300 that authorizes you

00:58:23.640 having to track

00:58:24.560 your cattle

00:58:25.060 or are they trying

00:58:26.200 to make a law

00:58:26.900 just by funding it

00:58:27.920 and then it somehow

00:58:29.240 becomes a law

00:58:29.960 because there's money

00:58:30.720 for it or something?

00:58:32.220 So,

00:58:32.700 I don't know exactly

00:58:34.000 if this is a bad idea,

00:58:35.840 but I know that the people

00:58:36.740 voting for it

00:58:37.400 I won't know.

00:58:38.620 The people voting for it

00:58:39.940 won't know it's there

00:58:40.760 and if they knew it was there,

00:58:42.400 they'd be like me.

00:58:43.180 I don't even know

00:58:43.940 if that's a good idea

00:58:44.780 or a bad idea.

00:58:46.140 But it does seem like,

00:58:48.740 according to Massey,

00:58:49.780 it'll be used

00:58:50.280 by the Green Agenda

00:58:51.460 to limit beef production,

00:58:53.580 which it could

00:58:55.160 because it would tell you

00:58:57.220 where's the beef?

00:58:59.760 Ah,

00:59:00.420 where's the beef?

00:59:01.860 Literally,

00:59:02.500 where's the beef?

00:59:07.680 It's literally

00:59:08.480 where's the beef?

00:59:09.540 That's funny.

00:59:10.480 Anyway,

00:59:11.560 so he thinks

00:59:14.000 it's a play

00:59:16.420 to dominate

00:59:17.120 the small ranchers

00:59:18.100 and it may in fact

00:59:19.440 be that.

00:59:22.020 Let's talk about

00:59:22.900 Rasmussen poll

00:59:23.800 and people asked

00:59:25.220 if they think

00:59:25.920 that Biden

00:59:26.360 took any money

00:59:27.000 from foreign companies

00:59:29.820 or foreign entities.

00:59:32.380 57% of likely

00:59:33.680 U.S. voters

00:59:34.280 do think

00:59:36.020 it's likely

00:59:36.580 that Biden

00:59:37.700 personally profited

00:59:38.720 from deals

00:59:39.400 from Chinese companies.

00:59:42.900 And 42%

00:59:44.180 think it's very likely.

00:59:45.800 Now,

00:59:46.060 you wouldn't be surprised

00:59:46.840 that that is dominated

00:59:48.000 by Republicans

00:59:49.000 who think that.

00:59:52.000 But let's see.

00:59:54.920 But 21%

00:59:56.360 of the voters

00:59:57.500 say it's not

00:59:58.820 at all likely.

01:00:02.040 They couldn't

01:00:02.960 even get 25%

01:00:04.480 to say

01:00:04.900 it's not at all likely.

01:00:07.200 25%,

01:00:07.960 as I remind you,

01:00:09.660 every poll,

01:00:10.880 at least 25%

01:00:12.000 get the wrong answer.

01:00:13.800 Well,

01:00:14.100 why am I saying

01:00:15.280 it's the wrong answer?

01:00:17.280 You know,

01:00:17.500 how do I know

01:00:18.200 if Biden

01:00:19.140 took money

01:00:19.640 from China?

01:00:20.740 Well,

01:00:20.920 I don't know,

01:00:21.600 but there is

01:00:22.060 a deposition

01:00:22.840 in a

01:00:23.380 congressional

01:00:24.880 impeachment inquiry

01:00:26.040 that says

01:00:27.700 that Biden

01:00:28.200 got $40,000

01:00:29.100 from

01:00:29.720 CEFC,

01:00:31.440 Chinese energy

01:00:32.060 company.

01:00:33.440 So,

01:00:34.360 we do have

01:00:35.140 some depositions.

01:00:36.440 I guess that means

01:00:37.060 under oath.

01:00:38.580 So,

01:00:39.120 there's evidence

01:00:39.640 under oath

01:00:40.140 that he took money.

01:00:40.740 I think everybody

01:00:42.940 who's really

01:00:43.720 paying attention

01:00:44.620 knows he took

01:00:45.220 money from

01:00:45.640 foreign countries.

01:00:48.020 Anyway,

01:00:49.160 I live in an area

01:00:51.820 which I would call

01:00:52.800 very non-political.

01:00:56.240 I don't think

01:00:57.080 Black Lives Matter

01:00:57.960 ever marched

01:00:58.680 in my town,

01:01:00.000 or if they did,

01:01:00.680 I didn't notice.

01:01:01.920 And you don't see

01:01:02.820 a ton of political signs.

01:01:04.460 I don't see any

01:01:05.100 Biden or Trump signs.

01:01:07.020 Don't see any

01:01:07.700 Trump hats.

01:01:09.220 You know,

01:01:09.400 we're generally

01:01:10.320 considered,

01:01:11.140 you know,

01:01:11.920 part of the

01:01:12.420 blue California.

01:01:14.740 But in person,

01:01:17.220 it's not nearly

01:01:18.060 as blue

01:01:18.560 as people think.

01:01:20.980 I can tell you

01:01:22.160 with personal

01:01:23.460 experience

01:01:24.120 that,

01:01:25.520 at least where

01:01:26.060 I live,

01:01:27.580 people are not

01:01:29.420 super political,

01:01:30.920 but they're also

01:01:32.360 not super

01:01:33.300 progressive

01:01:33.980 in the way

01:01:35.520 that,

01:01:36.520 you know,

01:01:36.820 you think

01:01:37.200 other Californians

01:01:37.980 are.

01:01:38.180 So,

01:01:40.020 it is notable

01:01:41.060 when there's

01:01:42.100 exactly one

01:01:42.980 issue in which

01:01:44.080 my region is

01:01:44.980 very politically

01:01:45.680 active.

01:01:47.140 Every time I go

01:01:47.860 to the grocery

01:01:48.320 store,

01:01:48.960 there's a petition

01:01:49.740 to recall

01:01:52.260 the Soros

01:01:52.960 prosecutor

01:01:53.600 in my area.

01:01:55.920 Her name

01:01:56.760 is Pam Price,

01:01:58.560 and she's

01:01:59.780 the Alameda

01:02:00.340 County

01:02:00.740 prosecutor,

01:02:01.840 so that

01:02:02.140 includes me.

01:02:03.780 That includes

01:02:04.360 me.

01:02:04.660 And she's

01:02:06.560 got a million

01:02:07.300 dollars for

01:02:07.900 Soros,

01:02:08.540 and there's

01:02:10.920 123,000

01:02:12.340 signatures to

01:02:13.240 recall her.

01:02:14.560 So,

01:02:15.180 to recall her.

01:02:15.820 I signed it.

01:02:18.940 So,

01:02:20.380 and the

01:02:21.600 recall is

01:02:22.440 because she's

01:02:22.880 jeopardizing the

01:02:23.660 safety of

01:02:24.180 every resident.

01:02:25.740 So,

01:02:26.560 that's sort

01:02:27.780 of a big

01:02:28.180 deal.

01:02:29.680 Just think

01:02:30.420 about it.

01:02:31.500 Think about

01:02:31.880 all the

01:02:32.600 things that

01:02:33.640 have happened

01:02:34.080 in the last

01:02:34.600 several years,

01:02:35.760 and my

01:02:36.260 town didn't

01:02:37.480 give a flying

01:02:38.480 fuck about

01:02:39.060 any of it,

01:02:40.100 I mean,

01:02:40.460 at least in

01:02:40.900 terms of being

01:02:41.380 politically active

01:02:42.240 on the streets,

01:02:43.540 except for

01:02:44.080 this.

01:02:45.440 This is what

01:02:46.340 my town

01:02:46.840 decided was

01:02:47.620 too far.

01:02:49.200 Soros buying

01:02:50.000 prosecutors to

01:02:51.000 destroy our

01:02:51.640 way of life.

01:02:52.980 That was

01:02:53.300 too far.

01:02:54.660 So,

01:02:55.080 looks like

01:02:56.280 Alameda's

01:02:56.840 going to fight

01:02:57.240 back,

01:02:57.820 so we'll

01:02:58.180 see.

01:02:58.400 All right,

01:03:01.600 big win for

01:03:02.600 Corey DeAngelis,

01:03:04.320 who you

01:03:05.080 might know

01:03:05.640 has been

01:03:06.260 tirelessly

01:03:07.860 fighting the

01:03:08.620 fight for

01:03:09.060 school choice,

01:03:10.600 and apparently

01:03:11.300 backed a number

01:03:12.140 of candidates

01:03:12.800 in the primary,

01:03:14.000 and they all

01:03:14.820 did well.

01:03:15.800 They just all

01:03:16.880 dominated the

01:03:17.640 competition.

01:03:18.580 So,

01:03:18.900 the suggestion

01:03:19.480 is that

01:03:20.260 candidates,

01:03:21.360 at least in

01:03:21.780 Texas,

01:03:22.540 who are

01:03:23.180 pro-choice

01:03:24.360 for school,

01:03:26.220 do really

01:03:27.520 well.

01:03:28.400 So,

01:03:28.740 that might

01:03:28.940 be the

01:03:29.200 beginning

01:03:29.480 of something

01:03:29.940 big.

01:03:31.880 You might

01:03:32.620 know that

01:03:33.220 Musk is 0.98

01:03:33.860 suing

01:03:34.120 OpenAI,

01:03:35.740 saying that

01:03:36.500 when he

01:03:37.660 originally funded

01:03:38.500 it,

01:03:38.820 he thought it

01:03:39.200 would be a

01:03:39.700 public,

01:03:40.480 open thing,

01:03:41.220 and then it

01:03:41.560 turned into

01:03:41.900 a for-profit

01:03:42.660 thing.

01:03:43.360 Well,

01:03:43.680 OpenAI has

01:03:44.300 responded,

01:03:45.760 and they make

01:03:46.660 a pretty good

01:03:47.120 argument,

01:03:47.820 so we'll see

01:03:48.340 how this

01:03:48.640 goes.

01:03:49.140 So,

01:03:49.380 their response

01:03:49.980 is,

01:03:50.280 and they show

01:03:50.640 some emails,

01:03:51.420 I guess,

01:03:53.160 in which the

01:03:54.100 internal

01:03:54.540 conversation,

01:03:55.600 before OpenAI

01:03:56.520 got started,

01:03:57.240 was that

01:03:58.640 everybody

01:03:58.940 agreed it

01:03:59.620 would need

01:03:59.960 billions of

01:04:00.700 dollars really

01:04:02.300 quick, 0.77

01:04:02.980 because the

01:04:03.900 computing requirement

01:04:05.260 would be so

01:04:05.940 massive,

01:04:06.960 you know,

01:04:07.140 you can't

01:04:07.540 just,

01:04:07.840 you can't

01:04:08.280 creep into

01:04:08.840 it,

01:04:09.540 right?

01:04:09.780 You can't

01:04:10.160 get a little

01:04:10.540 angel investment

01:04:12.260 of $100,000

01:04:13.300 and see what

01:04:14.220 you can do

01:04:14.760 and then build

01:04:15.320 it from there.

01:04:15.900 You have to

01:04:16.340 do the whole

01:04:16.740 thing.

01:04:17.640 Like,

01:04:17.900 you've got to

01:04:18.240 build a data

01:04:19.040 center,

01:04:19.700 or don't

01:04:20.260 bother.

01:04:21.060 So,

01:04:21.320 you're talking

01:04:21.680 billions fast.

01:04:23.680 And apparently

01:04:24.820 the people

01:04:25.320 having that

01:04:25.840 conversation

01:04:26.460 were aware

01:04:28.680 that private

01:04:31.160 industry is the

01:04:31.960 only place

01:04:32.400 you can get

01:04:32.820 billions of

01:04:33.340 dollars fast.

01:04:35.780 Now,

01:04:36.560 I do think

01:04:37.460 there's enough

01:04:37.940 wiggle room

01:04:38.760 in the emails

01:04:39.600 back and forth,

01:04:40.540 including Musk's

01:04:41.780 comments,

01:04:42.940 that it

01:04:44.200 doesn't,

01:04:44.760 it doesn't say

01:04:46.460 they all knew

01:04:47.160 it,

01:04:47.560 that it had

01:04:48.080 to be

01:04:49.020 private.

01:04:51.140 There's a little

01:04:51.980 ambiguity there,

01:04:53.060 so it's going

01:04:53.520 to be fun

01:04:54.000 to see how

01:04:54.500 they suss 0.98

01:04:55.260 out who

01:04:55.700 knew what,

01:04:56.420 who thought

01:04:57.000 what,

01:04:57.340 and who

01:04:57.540 wanted what.

01:04:58.680 We'll watch

01:04:59.060 that.

01:04:59.960 Meanwhile,

01:05:00.480 the New York

01:05:00.800 Post is

01:05:01.440 reporting that

01:05:02.740 some humpback 0.51

01:05:03.720 whales are

01:05:04.380 gay, 0.74

01:05:05.460 and the boys

01:05:07.340 will start

01:05:07.900 humping each

01:05:08.380 other.

01:05:10.020 And they

01:05:10.580 showed a

01:05:10.860 picture of

01:05:11.200 a whale,

01:05:11.900 it looked

01:05:12.460 like it was

01:05:12.860 on top of

01:05:13.400 another whale

01:05:13.860 humping it.

01:05:19.000 They're

01:05:19.520 literally

01:05:19.960 called humpback

01:05:21.080 whales.

01:05:23.060 And it's

01:05:23.820 a story

01:05:24.160 about one

01:05:25.940 of the whales

01:05:26.420 humping the

01:05:27.120 back of

01:05:27.500 another whale.

01:05:29.400 Now,

01:05:30.440 I don't

01:05:31.960 know,

01:05:32.100 this feels a

01:05:32.620 little too

01:05:32.980 simulation-y

01:05:33.840 to me.

01:05:35.540 And then

01:05:36.160 somebody else

01:05:36.660 said,

01:05:36.920 they're not

01:05:37.220 gay, 0.74

01:05:37.640 there's just,

01:05:38.160 you know,

01:05:38.380 one is just

01:05:38.840 abusing the

01:05:39.500 other with

01:05:39.880 his penis. 0.99

01:05:41.280 Well,

01:05:41.920 that's a fine

01:05:42.880 distinction.

01:05:44.260 But I know

01:05:46.120 that you're

01:05:46.620 expecting,

01:05:47.560 I might say

01:05:48.380 something about

01:05:50.000 a whale's

01:05:50.820 blowhole.

01:05:52.000 but no,

01:05:54.900 no,

01:05:55.220 I'm going

01:05:55.500 to show

01:05:55.800 you the

01:05:56.220 kind of

01:05:56.780 restraint

01:05:57.680 that you

01:05:59.080 don't usually

01:05:59.700 associate with

01:06:00.500 me.

01:06:01.680 Not only

01:06:02.520 am I not

01:06:03.720 going to say

01:06:04.160 anything about

01:06:05.400 the whale's

01:06:05.960 blowhole, 0.96

01:06:07.840 but I'm

01:06:08.320 going to let

01:06:08.660 you do it

01:06:09.300 while I have

01:06:10.460 a delicious

01:06:10.960 sip of

01:06:12.200 my coffee.

01:06:12.800 so if

01:06:14.020 you don't

01:06:14.340 mind,

01:06:16.360 15 seconds

01:06:17.440 in the

01:06:18.500 comments,

01:06:19.420 go wild,

01:06:20.680 make your

01:06:21.080 own gay 0.97

01:06:22.380 whale

01:06:22.720 blowhole

01:06:23.240 jokes

01:06:23.700 while I

01:06:25.000 casually

01:06:25.700 sip my

01:06:26.260 coffee and

01:06:27.100 watch your

01:06:27.520 work.

01:06:30.700 Do,

01:06:31.380 do,

01:06:31.660 do,

01:06:31.960 do.

01:06:33.160 Okay,

01:06:33.820 good.

01:06:34.200 Good first

01:06:34.980 entries.

01:06:35.820 You're doing

01:06:36.260 well.

01:06:37.700 Good,

01:06:38.600 good.

01:06:40.220 All right.

01:06:40.600 All right.

01:06:40.660 All right.

01:06:42.800 Good,

01:06:44.700 good.

01:06:45.120 You're doing

01:06:45.420 great.

01:06:46.480 Keep it up.

01:06:47.760 You got five

01:06:48.320 seconds left.

01:06:49.800 Come on,

01:06:50.180 bring the

01:06:50.560 gold.

01:06:52.300 Whale,

01:06:52.700 I can't

01:06:53.100 quit you. 0.67

01:06:53.980 I can't

01:06:54.460 quit you. 0.67

01:06:54.800 That's pretty

01:06:55.120 good.

01:06:56.160 All right.

01:06:56.620 Good.

01:06:59.140 I think

01:06:59.760 you all did

01:07:00.240 a really

01:07:00.660 good job.

01:07:03.160 All right.

01:07:03.560 And then

01:07:04.260 Rasmussen

01:07:04.700 also reports

01:07:05.720 on next

01:07:06.240 that regarding

01:07:08.900 the 2020

01:07:09.660 election in

01:07:10.500 Georgia,

01:07:11.720 apparently a

01:07:12.420 court in

01:07:12.920 Georgia.

01:07:15.140 No,

01:07:15.800 it's a

01:07:16.100 court testimony.

01:07:17.760 So they

01:07:18.080 have court

01:07:18.460 testimony.

01:07:19.120 That means

01:07:19.400 it's a

01:07:19.760 sworn

01:07:20.060 affidavit

01:07:20.740 that there

01:07:21.840 was no

01:07:22.260 signature

01:07:22.720 verification

01:07:23.320 done for

01:07:24.060 148,000

01:07:25.400 mail-in

01:07:25.800 ballots.

01:07:29.480 Now,

01:07:30.200 if I

01:07:31.000 understand

01:07:31.340 the story,

01:07:32.340 it's not

01:07:32.840 that there

01:07:33.200 was just

01:07:33.580 a witness.

01:07:35.000 I think

01:07:35.600 it's somebody

01:07:36.020 who was

01:07:36.300 involved with

01:07:37.160 the actual

01:07:37.780 process,

01:07:38.760 like somebody

01:07:39.180 who did

01:07:39.620 the work,

01:07:40.520 not somebody

01:07:41.020 who stood

01:07:41.400 there and

01:07:41.720 said,

01:07:41.960 I think

01:07:42.540 I saw

01:07:42.900 something.

01:07:44.020 No,

01:07:44.300 it was

01:07:44.400 somebody who

01:07:44.720 did the

01:07:45.000 work.

01:07:46.400 So there's

01:07:46.860 no question

01:07:47.480 of whether

01:07:47.800 they knew

01:07:48.380 that they

01:07:49.580 didn't do

01:07:49.980 it.

01:07:50.880 They're saying

01:07:51.560 on the

01:07:52.420 affidavit,

01:07:53.020 we didn't

01:07:53.320 do a

01:07:53.580 signature

01:07:53.920 match.

01:07:54.520 Now,

01:07:56.640 it's

01:07:58.120 2024,

01:08:01.200 and we've

01:08:02.840 been hearing

01:08:03.260 for the

01:08:04.460 entire time

01:08:05.180 that our

01:08:06.980 elections are

01:08:07.840 real secure,

01:08:08.840 but they

01:08:10.900 didn't tell

01:08:11.360 us that

01:08:11.740 in a

01:08:12.000 swing

01:08:12.260 state

01:08:12.680 with a

01:08:13.140 very

01:08:13.340 close

01:08:13.740 count

01:08:14.120 that

01:08:15.460 there

01:08:15.600 were

01:08:15.700 148,000

01:08:17.540 votes in

01:08:19.280 which they

01:08:19.600 didn't do

01:08:19.920 a signature

01:08:20.420 verification.

01:08:23.240 Now,

01:08:23.820 does that

01:08:24.140 mean that

01:08:24.620 the election

01:08:25.020 was rigged?

01:08:26.160 No.

01:08:27.800 But it

01:08:28.460 does mean

01:08:28.960 that everything

01:08:29.680 you've been

01:08:30.100 told about

01:08:30.680 how secure

01:08:31.320 the system

01:08:31.820 is was

01:08:32.780 always a

01:08:33.280 lie.

01:08:35.100 It was

01:08:35.820 always a

01:08:36.320 lie.

01:08:37.040 Of course

01:08:37.540 it was.

01:08:38.840 So,

01:08:39.960 keep an

01:08:41.140 eye on

01:08:41.480 that,

01:08:41.940 is what

01:08:42.180 I like

01:08:42.480 to say.

01:08:43.620 And that,

01:08:44.100 ladies and 0.98

01:08:44.400 gentlemen,

01:08:45.860 concludes my

01:08:46.800 amazing,

01:08:47.500 amazing live

01:08:48.120 stream.

01:08:48.660 Is there

01:08:48.840 any stories

01:08:49.480 I missed

01:08:49.960 that I

01:08:50.280 really

01:08:50.540 should have?

01:08:51.860 Really

01:08:52.240 should have?

01:08:55.280 McConnell

01:08:55.720 endorsed

01:08:56.220 Trump?

01:08:56.800 Did that

01:08:57.140 just happen?

01:08:58.440 I guess

01:08:59.060 that makes

01:08:59.580 sense.

01:09:03.260 Yeah,

01:09:03.780 there are

01:09:03.960 lots of

01:09:04.300 other

01:09:04.600 Georgia

01:09:05.380 accusations.

01:09:08.840 Musk said

01:09:13.120 he's not

01:09:13.700 donating to

01:09:14.540 either

01:09:14.840 candidate.

01:09:15.440 There was

01:09:15.640 a story

01:09:16.000 that Musk

01:09:16.600 might have

01:09:17.680 met with

01:09:18.160 Trump

01:09:18.560 at Mar-a-Lago.

01:09:21.060 Now,

01:09:21.740 I don't know

01:09:22.800 if that

01:09:23.080 happened,

01:09:23.680 but it

01:09:24.920 would be

01:09:25.380 a mistake

01:09:25.880 for Musk

01:09:26.800 to donate

01:09:27.340 to either

01:09:27.740 candidate.

01:09:29.300 Yeah.

01:09:31.020 But we

01:09:31.680 do think

01:09:32.060 they might

01:09:32.380 have met.

01:09:33.280 Now,

01:09:33.540 that would

01:09:33.760 have been

01:09:33.940 an interesting

01:09:34.760 meeting.

01:09:37.980 Yeah,

01:09:38.420 so Elon

01:09:39.840 did meet

01:09:40.380 Trump.

01:09:40.800 Apparently,

01:09:41.200 people are

01:09:41.980 saying that's

01:09:42.380 confirmed.

01:09:43.920 You say

01:09:44.440 you bet

01:09:44.960 Elon buys

01:09:45.700 truth social.

01:09:49.460 I'll bet

01:09:49.880 he doesn't.

01:09:51.560 I'll take

01:09:52.280 that bet.

01:09:53.260 I'll bet

01:09:53.600 he doesn't.

01:09:58.080 Can you

01:09:58.700 reject an

01:09:59.300 endorsement?

01:10:00.080 I guess

01:10:00.460 you can.

01:10:00.820 All right.

01:10:07.060 Okay,

01:10:07.600 I think

01:10:07.840 we covered

01:10:08.260 everything.

01:10:09.120 Thanks for

01:10:09.480 joining on

01:10:10.100 the X

01:10:10.580 platform

01:10:11.200 and on

01:10:12.280 Rumble

01:10:13.500 and YouTube.

01:10:14.400 If you're

01:10:14.600 listening to

01:10:15.060 this on

01:10:15.620 Spotify,

01:10:17.240 I might

01:10:17.940 have to

01:10:18.300 pull it

01:10:18.600 off of

01:10:18.880 Spotify

01:10:19.300 because I've

01:10:20.540 been demonetized,

01:10:21.880 but it might

01:10:22.420 be my fault.

01:10:23.380 There's a

01:10:23.700 user interface

01:10:24.500 mystery that

01:10:26.360 was injected

01:10:27.020 into the

01:10:27.460 system.

01:10:27.880 I just

01:10:28.100 know I'm

01:10:28.380 not monetized.

01:10:29.200 I don't

01:10:29.380 know if it's

01:10:29.700 my fault

01:10:30.100 or not.

01:10:31.120 So either

01:10:31.660 way,

01:10:32.060 whether it's

01:10:32.380 my fault

01:10:32.800 or somebody

01:10:33.180 else's,

01:10:33.600 if I can't

01:10:34.020 get it

01:10:34.220 monetized,

01:10:34.720 I'm going

01:10:34.920 to pull

01:10:35.160 it off

01:10:35.440 of Spotify.

01:10:36.440 But you

01:10:36.700 can find

01:10:37.020 it on

01:10:37.660 X or

01:10:38.860 YouTube or

01:10:39.560 Rumble or

01:10:40.160 Locals.

01:10:41.360 Bye for

01:10:41.720 now.

01:10:42.000 See you

01:10:42.200 tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 06, 2024

Episode 2405 CWSA 03⧸06⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript