Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2409 CWSA 03⧸10⧸24

00:00:00.880 Wow.

00:00:03.200 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:11.660 It's called Coffee with Scott Adamson.

00:00:14.080 It's the best thing that ever happened to you.

00:00:16.240 And if you'd like to enjoy this experience at levels that nobody can even understand,

00:00:21.360 oh, I'm going to have to turn off this monitor.

00:00:24.220 I'm watching two monitors and I'm delayed on one.

00:00:26.980 do you know how hard it is to talk when you're watching yourself do something that you're not

00:00:31.080 actually doing i'm talking and i'm watching myself on the other monitor doing the the paper tap thing

00:00:38.020 anyway that's not ideal but if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody

00:00:44.100 can even understand all you need for that is a cuppa mug or a glass of tanker chalice of

00:00:48.940 stein a canteen jug of flask a vessel of any kind and fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee

00:00:54.560 and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dope means of the day the thing that makes

00:00:58.800 everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go

00:01:03.600 hmm pretty good pretty good

00:01:11.060 so how many of you are uh exhausted from losing that hour of sleep last night i am i am totally

00:01:20.800 exhausted yep that didn't work out at all for me so we'll see if we can limp through this um the

00:01:27.760 update on my internet connection is the internet providers coming out this afternoon they detected

00:01:33.840 a problem in their network so it might not be on my end um if you're reading dilbert reborn or if

00:01:42.800 your subscriber either on the locals platform scottadams.locals.com or on the x profile um

00:01:53.280 then uh you would know that uh dilbert's company is having trouble because china stole their source code

00:02:01.040 i don't want to give away too much but when china stole the source code of dilbert's company

00:02:06.160 it didn't go well for china yeah that's a little preview um you may have noticed i lost my blue

00:02:14.000 check mark on x uh because i i think i knew this but i forgot i changed my profile picture

00:02:23.280 and they take your they take your uh blue check away now it's supposedly supposed to come back after

00:02:30.240 they verify you or something but it's been days i don't know if it's coming back or not i'm not even

00:02:35.920 sure if i'm monetized anymore that it's like the worst thing that they should if i could make one

00:02:42.480 suggestion before you are allowed to change your profile before then it should tell you you can lose

00:02:50.720 your check mark not after no not after because i wouldn't have changed it if i know if i know that

00:02:57.920 i'd lose my check mark i don't even know if it's coming back well did you know that uh you know

00:03:04.800 biden made a bunch of money available to move american chip production over to the usa but that's

00:03:11.600 not working out at all guess why turns out nobody wants to manufacture chips when you need a skilled

00:03:19.840 workforce and you also have dei requirements people are deciding oh we can't do this in america

00:03:28.800 because we can't do those two things we can't get enough skilled employees if we also have to serve a

00:03:34.960 different master of you know hitting getting some requirements for uh dei so there are companies that

00:03:41.840 could be building american chip production in america that uh are looking for other countries

00:03:47.040 companies so we have people who are perfectly willing and able to build chip manufacturing in america

00:03:56.880 and we burden them with such ridiculous requirements that they're like no thanks i think we'll go to a

00:04:03.360 third world country we'll be safer well there's a brand new building material that uh can warm you when

00:04:12.480 it's cold and make you cooler when it's warm reminds me of that old thermos joke you know you put hot

00:04:19.760 water in your thermos and it stays hot you put cold water in your thermos and it stays cold how does it

00:04:26.000 know it's an old joke i don't know who said it first but apparently there's a material that knows how to absorb

00:04:34.240 when it wants to make the building warmer and it knows how to automatically reflect when it needs to keep

00:04:40.640 it cooler and it's auto it's not not automated it's just built into the material so you don't have to

00:04:48.640 you have any electronics or anything it just does it so that's pretty cool something coming out of chinese

00:04:54.320 research in wuhan what it's from the wuhan university of technology well nothing bad has ever come out of

00:05:02.720 wuhan so i think we're fine about that all right there's a new study that i'm going to tell you in

00:05:11.680 advance before i tell you the content it is the most accurate credible completely reliable study i've ever

00:05:19.200 seen in my life you know how to interpret that right it agrees with my it agrees with what i wanted to hear

00:05:29.360 and that's what i call science and the study says that uh quote another unexpected benefit from

00:05:37.600 consuming uh cannabis uh especially when it's recreational is that participants who only use

00:05:47.040 cannabis recreationally has significantly lower risk of subjective cognitive decline as much as

00:05:55.200 as 96 percent less risk compared to non-users did you hear the 96 part

00:06:10.640 96 percent less risk of being impaired if you smoke marijuana regularly

00:06:18.400 so this is all part of my plan to run for president when i'm 90 years old because let me tell you

00:06:27.920 i haven't done any double blind placebo controlled randomized controlled trials

00:06:34.640 but i feel like i'm getting smarter every day yeah i feel like that's happening all right um

00:06:41.200 um there's an update on the mcconnell's mitch mcconnell's uh sister-in-law who tragically drove her

00:06:49.440 tesla into a lake and drowned remember we all had some conspiracy theories about it must have been murder

00:06:56.320 somehow they got her uh turns out we know fairly substantially uh you know with credibility that it

00:07:05.200 wasn't murder it was uh an accident but worse than you imagined because apparently she was able to

00:07:11.680 make a cell phone call from her submerged car now if that's the only thing you know about this story

00:07:20.480 it's about as horrible as anything i can even imagine so i guess they didn't have divers when

00:07:26.080 the emergency crews got there they couldn't get around she couldn't open the door they didn't have anything

00:07:31.200 that would tow her out and so i guess it was one woman who dove in and tried to do something but that 1.00

00:07:38.560 was impossible so but the i don't want to call it good news it's definitely not good news but uh it's news

00:07:48.000 that it was just an accident one of the worst ones i've ever heard in my life honestly so she drove her car

00:07:55.520 into a lake well speaking of lakin uh lakin rally um that she's still in the news because you know she

00:08:08.000 was tragically murdered by an undocumented who some say illegal immigrant and the issue is that uh biden 0.99

00:08:16.560 had referred to the killer as illegal but had to walk it back because all the democrats said you can't

00:08:24.000 call that murderer illegal you must say undocumented and you know 1.00

00:08:32.160 personal point of privilege i'd like to make the news more about me

00:08:37.440 because that's what is missing a lot of the news would be stories that don't involve me and i feel

00:08:44.160 that's just wrong so i'd like to make this about me somehow and i'd like to say that if i ever get

00:08:50.240 murdered by somebody who came from another country i hope they're undocumented because i feel that 1.00

00:08:58.160 wouldn't hurt as much as an illegal am i wrong about that if you get murdered by an undocumented person 1.00

00:09:07.360 i don't think it hurts as much so that's what i'm hoping for setting my sights low

00:09:13.440 well as uh balaji uh sreenivasan was pointing out uh uh that the new york times bestseller list

00:09:23.920 did you know that's always been fake how many of you were aware of that that the new york times

00:09:29.920 bestseller list is not based on who sells the most books did you know that it's editorial

00:09:37.920 they get to decide what's on the list and what's not i first learned that when i had the number one

00:09:43.840 best-selling book in the country but not according to the new york times best-selling list now keep in

00:09:50.320 mind that if you're an author and you're working with a big publisher they have access to the actual

00:09:55.600 sales reports they know what book is number one the publishers do and then they look at the new york

00:10:01.920 times is different now as a publisher no i'm sorry as a as an author i've known that for 25 years

00:10:11.200 something like that and that was one of my first wake-up calls that nothing is real just nothing is

00:10:18.960 real if the new york times bestseller list is not really based on who's selling the most books do you

00:10:25.840 think the news is real do you think anything in that newspaper is real well what could be easier

00:10:34.400 than just saying who sold the most books it doesn't get much easier than that it's automated

00:10:40.720 every everybody's looking at the same data you know i think it only is from the big companies but that

00:10:45.600 tells you who sells the most that is the book selling data is only from the larger booksellers it's

00:10:51.520 not from every bookseller but that gets 85 of them all right um but although the new york times best

00:11:01.520 selling list is fake one thing we can feel good about and i think you'd all join me in this is

00:11:09.600 at least the climate models are real yeah just when you're feeling like oh is everything made up and

00:11:16.560 fake at least those climate models are completely real yeah everything else is fake

00:11:25.440 moving on uh there's a uh oscar-nominated film called the holdovers that i never heard of because

00:11:32.960 i don't watch movies anymore because they're all garbage is uh apparently the the writer of the

00:11:39.840 script is accused of plagiarism so the claim is that there was some script that never got made into a 0.52

00:11:45.920 movie that a lot of people saw and the person who wrote this movie saw it and they know there's some

00:11:52.240 information that they know the writer saw it and so it's an oscar-nominated film but it might be

00:12:00.320 plagiarized that's the claim wow if you can't trust the oscars who can you trust

00:12:08.720 list so i guess i can't trust the new york times bestseller list and i can't really trust that the

00:12:16.080 oscar-nominated film is not plagiarized but at least climate models are real i mean we we still have

00:12:25.680 that we still have that people we still have that all right trump continues to be the president who swears

00:12:35.920 better than any president has ever sweared at least in public at his rally he said and i quote everything 0.99

00:12:42.960 joe biden touches turns to shit everything 0.97

00:12:48.800 now uh here's a lesson in cursing cursing is generally a bad idea and it's especially bad when 0.99

00:12:59.120 women do it now you're gonna say to me what that's kind of sexist i'm just saying that when women curse 1.00

00:13:07.440 there's a substantial number of men who go pass now i'm not one of them i don't mind when women curse at

00:13:15.680 all but it's a bad play if you're if you're single there's a pretty substantial percentage of men

00:13:25.360 who have a problem with it i don't know what the percentage is maybe 20 percent something like that

00:13:31.760 but i don't i don't think it works the same for men i don't think women are judging men the same way

00:13:37.200 it could be wrong but uh trump really knows how to use it as just the right accent if he swore more than

00:13:45.120 he does it would be too much and it would just be gross if he never swore we wouldn't get this cool

00:13:51.200 story he swears exactly the right amount and exactly the right way like because it turns into

00:13:58.880 a quotable you know moment and here i am talking about it so persuasion wise uh trump is on target

00:14:08.320 with that there will be more stories about trump coming up i have a theory that there's no

00:14:18.160 complicated political story that it ever matters to voters uh people like me and many of you watching

00:14:24.960 this don't you think that we're kind of weird like how many people could describe the you know

00:14:34.400 the steel document and where that all went and you know was menifer really doing anything that could

00:14:41.840 be called collusion or was he doing his own thing you know what's up with the law fair with trump

00:14:46.960 what's up with biden's ukraine stuff and hunter biden i feel maybe five percent of the country

00:14:57.120 could even describe what those things are i mean they sort of generally know who it's good for and

00:15:02.160 who it's bad for but they don't really know and i've got a feeling that if you don't really understand it

00:15:07.440 it doesn't change your vote you could be aware it's out there and if somebody asked you say oh that's

00:15:14.800 bad but i don't think it changes your vote if it's complicated so i think that's why law that's one of

00:15:22.160 the reasons not the only reason i think it's one of the reasons the law fair doesn't work against trump

00:15:27.280 is that we can't really hold it in our heads there are too many cases too many details

00:15:32.080 i don't know is he winning this week is he losing do i care are there any victims i'm not really sure

00:15:40.960 so it doesn't really change my vote likewise all the hunter biden ukraine chinese money lost diamonds

00:15:50.720 stuff it all sounds pretty bad but you know i follow this stuff every day or try to

00:15:57.600 do and i'm not sure i could do a great job of explaining it all you know i could get the

00:16:04.000 highlights lost diamonds selling influence but i'm not sure i could get you know most of the nuance of

00:16:11.760 it so um so that's going to be my my theme is that uh just keep in mind that the more complexity to a

00:16:20.480 story the less compelling it is no matter how bad it is let me say that again because that's an

00:16:27.360 important point no matter how bad the story should be because of what we know about it it just doesn't

00:16:33.920 affect people because they can't handle that level of complexity enough to make it up make it an

00:16:40.480 operating part of their decision making so let's talk about tick tock as you know there was a bipartisan

00:16:50.480 50 to 0 vote to ban it and of committee now the committee doesn't get to decide um the whole congress

00:16:58.800 gets to decide and you might say to yourself wait a minute if it's bipartisan and it's 50 people

00:17:07.280 and it's 50 to zero that that's very predictive that it's going to get banned wouldn't you say

00:17:13.200 in a normal world in a normal world that would be very predictive in our world not so much so

00:17:22.560 surprisingly trump who used to be in favor of the ban um when he was president and even tried to get

00:17:29.280 a band is now in favor of it uh staying unbanned and uh vivek is also he's said this before but he uses it

00:17:40.880 to use it during his campaign and uh he says free speech um you know let us stand

00:17:49.360 and rand paul rand paul also said yes keep tick tock kind of surprised some of you probably did any of

00:17:56.800 those names surprise you you thought what i i thought they'd be for the ban but now rand says freedom is

00:18:05.200 speech and thomas massey also now what do those four people have in common besides being republicans

00:18:13.520 what do they all have in common well there's some of the smartest people in politics

00:18:20.480 right i mean that the thing that jumps out is like oh that's a little list of the smartest

00:18:26.480 people in politics right there and they're all on the same side so they're on the same side of uh

00:18:32.880 keeping it but here's the interesting thing when they talk about it they talk about it like they

00:18:38.800 don't understand the topic now how do you reconcile that when i say they don't understand the topic

00:18:45.600 they'll say things like um first amendment freedom of speech but they have to know that doesn't apply to

00:18:52.240 a chinese propaganda company of course they do and they talk about data security

00:18:58.160 but they don't talk about the persuasion risk which is the biggest one by far i mean not even close

00:19:06.960 so why would so such smart people when they talk about it talk about it in such a weak way that's

00:19:14.880 nonsensical frankly well if you follow the news you might know that there's a uh a republican

00:19:23.200 rich guy billionaire who funds a lot of the dem a lot of the republicans his last name is uh yes

00:19:35.120 y-a-s-s and he's some billionaire who owns a he's an american guy who owns 15 of bite dance which

00:19:41.840 owns tick tock so i would imagine 15 of tick tock would be worth i don't know 100 billion 200 billion

00:19:52.160 something in that age so he's got you know and and his money is locked up because the chinese government 0.85

00:20:00.160 disallowed uh bite dance from doing an ipo now if they'd go in public that'd be a liquidity event

00:20:07.360 eventually and he'd be able to sell a stake maybe not right away but eventually but there's no liquidity

00:20:13.440 event so he's kind of trapped until there is one and unless he could sell it privately i suppose

00:20:20.160 um and then the other thing we know is that uh said billionaire uh met with trump and uh looks like

00:20:31.040 they're getting along they didn't uh they didn't get along until recently and now they're getting

00:20:36.080 along and it looks like uh trump will be benefiting from some funding from this big funder other people

00:20:44.640 who are reportedly funded by the same entity the i guess he owns the entity called what's it called

00:20:59.600 it's called congress i'm sorry it's called the club of growth so the billionaire seems to be associated

00:21:07.360 with i guess it's a a pack so it funds an entity which funds a bunch of republicans and kelly ann conway

00:21:16.080 is reportedly uh lobbying congress to keep tick tock and she's doing it on behalf of the club of growth

00:21:23.600 so she would be a key advisor to trump and is working for the billionaire who owns some of tick tock now and

00:21:32.720 there's a report that uh that club of growth also helps fund rand paul um i'd heard also that vivek and

00:21:41.040 thomas massey probably get some benefit from that funding as well so

00:21:46.560 so

00:21:51.040 so what do you think happened here what what it looks like is that trump wanted to ban it and maybe

00:21:57.840 uh maybe some of the others did at some point as well there's no evidence of that but uh

00:22:06.400 they would be sort of in trouble if they did because they've got funding now what makes this interesting

00:22:14.160 is that the reason that trump might be a little bit more interested in funding than normal is because

00:22:20.160 the lawfare from the democrats squeezed his cash flow so so aggressively so it kind of put trump in a

00:22:27.840 situation where money would be more important than it normally would just because the timing and having to

00:22:34.400 come up with huge amounts of cash for his bonds and stuff like that um but let me give you an idea of what

00:22:41.920 the argument looks like so here's uh here's what ran paul said on the x platform he said if congress

00:22:52.560 bans tick tock they'll be acting just like the chinese communists who have also banned tick tock 0.84

00:22:59.200 why not just defend the first amendment

00:23:03.200 dan crenshaw who i'm guessing either never got money from that billionaire

00:23:07.120 or doesn't plan to get any says this in response to ran paul now keep in mind you know these these are

00:23:16.560 two people who are in the republican world and they're not in the same team so crenshaw says

00:23:23.280 to anyone defending tick tock he said you're not defending the first amendment our first amendment

00:23:28.400 doesn't apply to the chinese communist party

00:23:30.640 they use tick tock to collect data and can weaponize that into the greatest propaganda

00:23:38.000 machine against americans we ever ever seen sorry you're getting complaints from gen z but get over

00:23:44.640 it and do what's right and stop lying that legislation doesn't ban tick tock it just says it can't be

00:23:50.400 controlled by our adversaries well let me add a nuance to that the chinese communist party says that they

00:23:57.520 won't sell it which is probably a bluff if they had no choice they might but um there's not exactly a

00:24:07.520 plan that it would still exist if it were banned right so that would require something that's unlikely

00:24:14.480 to happen them selling it to an american entity now compare these two arguments ran paul one of the

00:24:20.960 smartest people in the congress he says it's a first amendment issue and then dan crenshaw and by the

00:24:29.280 way doesn't mention the persuasion risk at all and then dan crenshaw does mention the persuasion risk

00:24:35.840 so he accurately has identified the top problem and says it's the top problem so now crenshaw is right on

00:24:42.720 he's right on the money and then he says the first amendment doesn't apply to the chinese communist

00:24:47.840 party's propaganda now which of those arguments makes perfect sense and which one it doesn't

00:24:55.920 all right so i'm leading the witness here but crenshaw is a hundred percent and ran paul got a zero

00:25:04.000 he got a zero on an easy question so how do you explain somebody getting a zero like you're just

00:25:09.360 getting everything wrong and so obviously wrong on an easy question when you're one of the smart ones

00:25:18.480 so as i as i was posting the other day something is amiss something is amiss so whatever it is we

00:25:27.040 thought we knew about the situation no i was speculating that it was maybe our our intelligence

00:25:33.920 people had already penetrated it so maybe we had some internal benefit we didn't know about in other

00:25:39.200 words you know maybe tick tock has some terrorists on it and you know it's better to keep it the way it is

00:25:45.520 and the terrorists don't know that we can see them you know i was thinking there may be some argument

00:25:51.760 for keeping it that's security related that's non-obvious you know maybe opposite of what it

00:25:57.280 looks like sort of thing but then i find out that the people who are uh uncharacteristically acting like 0.97

00:26:04.240 they're idiots when we know they're not um have a gigantic financial benefit at least two of the four 0.77

00:26:13.280 and the other two are suspected so it looks like it's exactly what it looks like it looks like for 1.00

00:26:19.200 money they have picked a position which would be bad for american children now the press is making a

00:26:29.120 a pretty big deal about it so we'll see we'll see if this becomes news now remember my theme

00:26:35.280 my theme was that the public doesn't change their vote because of anything complicated

00:26:41.040 this is complicated because you would have to understand you know the whole tick tock

00:26:47.280 nature the business model what would happen if they sold it could they sell it would the chinese 0.73

00:26:52.480 government sell it what's really different from you know facebook compared to this is it really just

00:26:58.240 first amendment so you'd have to know the constitution you'd have to know business models you'd have to

00:27:03.280 be following the story you'd have to know you know how politics works so um let's talk about this from

00:27:14.800 the i guess i don't have to make a moral or ethical argument about anything you're all you're all

00:27:22.400 perfectly capable of doing that right so you don't need to know what i think of this given that um let

00:27:30.640 me tell you i conflate in my mind tick tock and fentanyl now you might not and and i don't mean just

00:27:39.280 because sometimes we say tick tock is digital fentanyl which it is the reason i conflate them um is that

00:27:46.800 uh the chinese communist party provides the fentanyl precursors and you famously you know that my 0.95

00:27:54.880 stepson died from a fentanyl overdose in 2018. so i hold i have a personal grudge against china and when

00:28:03.840 i see them sending another form of fentanyl this case digital fentanyl i just conflate them

00:28:09.680 so in my in my just personal world um you know what i think about it i don't need i don't need to

00:28:20.320 detail it do i so here's what i'm going to do uh i'm going to talk about these four individuals going

00:28:27.440 forward um just calling balls and strikes yeah i'm just going to say you know when they do something

00:28:33.680 that's let's say persuasive and when it's not and i'll talk about the interesting stories but i'm not

00:28:39.200 going to endorse anybody for president you okay with that from an ethical and moral standpoint i

00:28:47.680 can't i can't endorse trump because of this now let's talk about the strategy of it though

00:28:54.720 the political strategy of it might be brilliant let's talk about that um number one just because

00:29:02.720 it came out of a bipartisan committee 50 to 0 does that mean it was ever going to pass the congress

00:29:09.200 because that matters if it was never going to pass then all trump did was pick up free money

00:29:17.360 you see what i'm saying if if he was sure it wasn't going to pass because it didn't have the votes

00:29:23.280 and maybe it wouldn't have the votes because this republican billionaire

00:29:26.640 would make sure it didn't have the votes so suppose trump knew it couldn't pass

00:29:30.960 in that situation if he made a deal that said all right i'll i'll say i'm for keeping tick tock

00:29:39.360 if you'll fund my campaign it's just free money because it was going to pass it was going to do

00:29:46.240 what it was going to do no matter what trump did trump doesn't have a vote he doesn't have a veto

00:29:51.200 being out of office and you could argue oh he could persuade his republicans no he couldn't

00:29:58.800 no he couldn't he probably can't he's not so persuasive he can just make them vote for something

00:30:04.400 that's against their best interest so in their best interest would be keeping a big donor on their side

00:30:10.880 so it could be that trump is just playing it um like a poker game and he's saying if i'm in favor of the ban

00:30:21.360 i get no money and i get no ban

00:30:26.960 you're following me if he had agreed to continue saying let's ban it you would get no funding

00:30:34.160 and he also wouldn't get a ban you get nothing if he says all right you know inexplicably i'm

00:30:41.040 going to change my mind let's keep this tick tock stuff then he gets funding he could become president

00:30:48.560 and once president in the second term guess what he's not beholden to anybody after that

00:30:56.720 so it's entirely possible that he's willie browning this situation you know willie brown

00:31:03.600 he was a big san francis well california politician and uh he accepted money from

00:31:10.160 some tobacco company for his campaign at the same time that there is a some legislation about banning

00:31:16.720 smoking and indoors i guess and somebody said how could you possibly be objective

00:31:22.720 you know if you're taking money from the company you're voting on their product

00:31:27.040 and willie brown famously said if you can't take money from somebody and then turn around and

00:31:31.760 stab them in the back you're in the wrong business now that was the moment that i loved willie brown

00:31:39.600 like yeah that's the most honest thing i've ever heard a politician ever say and and indeed indeed

00:31:46.640 the law went against the tobacco companies so not only was it true he proved it he took the money and then

00:31:53.840 he screwed him and he did it publicly and right in front of us okay i'm all right with that so if it

00:32:03.040 turned out that um let's say this billionaire guy his liquidity event sometime during the second term of

00:32:11.520 trump do you think that trump might have a change of heart after his friend got his money out

00:32:16.480 maybe so he might get both he might get the money and he might also ban it that's a possibility but

00:32:25.920 it's not going to happen as long as that billionaire's got money in the company that's my guess

00:32:31.120 um and i think that uh politically if trump looks like the one who the funny thing is that now biden

00:32:41.440 wants to ban it you know they they have to be on opposite sides now biden's strength is the young

00:32:47.440 voters who love them some tick tock so now biden is opposed to tick tock and trump is in favor of

00:32:57.760 keeping it and what is the depth of analysis that the young people will put into this allow me to

00:33:05.680 demonstrate tick tock yes or tick tock no that's it that's it they are not going to be thinking about

00:33:18.560 the geopolitical implications of the chinese communist party influencing united states politics they're going

00:33:26.080 to be where's my reels what do they call them where's my tick tocks

00:33:30.960 so it could be that trump wins simply by being looking like he's pro free speech looking like

00:33:38.240 he's pro tick tock even though what's really happening is that there's nothing he could do

00:33:43.440 either way about it so he might as well take the free money um and he would certainly be playing to win

00:33:51.440 you know you know one of the things that people say about the republicans even republicans say about it

00:33:57.840 is why do they play to lose have you noticed that it's like republicans sometimes will do things

00:34:04.240 maybe on a principle but they're like well this principle is so important we're going to lose the

00:34:09.280 election i don't think trump makes that mistake one of the things you can hate about him and love about

00:34:16.800 him at the same time is he's playing to win i think this is a clear example that he does need the money

00:34:24.640 and it would help him win and it's going to be expensive so so i'm not going to endorse i think that's

00:34:35.200 that's a line i'm not going to cross i think tick tock is dangerous to the youth but if it turns out

00:34:42.720 trump has taken the free money and then he bans it later i'll change my opinion

00:34:47.280 all right um coincidentally trump made the 92 billion bond he had to put up in order to challenge

00:34:57.520 the eugene carroll defamation case oh well trump's got some money now huh all right uh trump's also uh

00:35:07.280 got some legal bills he tried to sue the christopher steel organization i guess that had pushed the

00:35:16.000 so-called russia collusion hoax

00:35:20.240 and uh he lost that so now he has to pay the legal fees of the other side and the reason he lost it

00:35:28.400 is that i guess the judge ruled that even though the dossier was a bunch of defamation and bs they quote

00:35:38.480 never intended to make the dossier public

00:35:43.920 never intended to make it public that was his only purpose which we know because of

00:35:50.160 legal proceedings in this country so this happened in i guess england uh but now do you think do you

00:35:59.760 think you you've learned enough about how the legal system works as long as you can shop for a location

00:36:05.680 you can convict anybody you can have any any um civil suit outcome you just have to pick the right

00:36:14.320 place for the case it has nothing to do with the evidence apparently so evidence doesn't matter

00:36:21.760 looks like rfk jr is possibly going to look at being a joining the libertarian party primarily because

00:36:29.760 the libertarian party has ballot access and i guess most are all the states and rfk jr on his own

00:36:37.520 is doing great getting ballot access but isn't getting them all might be a problem getting them all so

00:36:43.840 that's a possibility uh i'd like to make a conditional prediction more a statistical prediction

00:36:53.040 um why are we assuming that the president has to be one of the two people trump or biden just

00:36:59.680 because they're going to be the party nominees probably isn't that isn't that a dangerous assumption

00:37:06.880 so i would like to add to the mix that there's at least a 30 chance

00:37:12.080 that neither trump nor biden will be president uh biden has an obvious you know mental health and

00:37:19.840 health risk and even the democrats might want to keep him out of office if it gets a little bit worse

00:37:26.480 um even more than they want to keep him out now and trump has the lawfare risk plus you know god knows

00:37:33.520 what opposition research plus god knows what kind of uh i don't know who knows what kind of uh hoaxes

00:37:43.840 they're going to pull on them if you look at the history of hoaxes the 2016 election was the uh russia

00:37:51.680 collusion hoax the 2020 election was the fine people hoax and the 2024 election is the january

00:37:59.040 six insurrection hoax combined with the dictator for a day hoax for three elections in a row the

00:38:06.640 democrats have run primarily on hoax now why am i the only person who says that out loud shouldn't that

00:38:16.560 be you know sort of the framing of every newscast from now on well the democrats who have a unbroken

00:38:24.320 string of hoax related campaigns here's their new one don't you think the fact that if you only run

00:38:32.880 on hoaxes that ought to be something that the news mentions on a fairly regular basis when you're

00:38:39.520 talking about them you know i'm sure john dillinger uh has done did legal things as well as his vast

00:38:50.240 you know repertoire of crime so if you're going to talk about john dillinger you wouldn't talk about

00:38:56.960 that time he did the legal thing i feel like it would be completely important that every time john

00:39:03.680 dillinger comes up that you make sure that the people know you're talking about a major criminal

00:39:09.360 right it seems the same the the democrat party is really just a criminal organization if you run three

00:39:18.000 presidential campaigns on known obvious hoaxes you are a criminal organization that to imagine that

00:39:26.320 that that's just politics now i get that all politicians lie and the fact checks and the hyperbole but three

00:39:37.280 completely made up hoaxes no that's criminal organization i can't call that politics

00:39:46.720 all right so it's entirely possible that rfk junior will be the last standing

00:39:53.280 um major politician so i would say that rfk junior's chances of being president are

00:40:04.480 almost the same as trump and uh and biden because biden has you know good chance of not making it to the

00:40:12.720 finish line and the bad people are going to try everything to stop trump so even if trump doesn't

00:40:20.240 you know shoot himself in the foot we don't know how far they're willing to go so they could be uh

00:40:28.400 they could be cranking up the uh the law fair they could be uh cheating on the election they could be

00:40:36.800 planning an assassination there's almost no limit to what could happen

00:40:41.680 anyway so i would say that given that the two major candidates uh have a real tough

00:40:52.240 hurdle to even be there on election day i think it's a three-way race and it doesn't look that way

00:40:59.360 because no nobody's going to say they'll vote for rfk junior if one of the other candidates is in there

00:41:04.480 that they like but if you imagine neither of them are there what's it look like

00:41:11.920 let me let me say it again if you imagine that neither trump nor biden make it to the end

00:41:18.480 and then you imagine that rfk junior is on every ticket but he might be running against somebody else

00:41:25.200 in both cases he might be running against somebody else could he win

00:41:28.400 if both parties have to do a last minute substitution who's that going to be who's

00:41:36.080 it going to be i don't know so maybe their vp choices i don't know

00:41:44.720 so i guess the uh haiti is a basket case and the jails have been emptied by the criminals themselves and

00:41:52.080 um and yet a federal judge here has ruled that 30 000 would be asylum seekers from four countries

00:42:00.560 by haiti is one of them um can enter the u.s and continue to do it so so the the the government

00:42:09.600 is flying in extra migrants who maybe couldn't get here on their own so we're actually flying them in 1.00

00:42:16.560 maybe over 300 000 a year and that that's now legal and just built into the system

00:42:21.440 well here's what we can conclude parents or adults in general you are on your own for the following

00:42:28.000 topics because your government has basically taken a pass you are on your own for fentanyl there's

00:42:34.720 nobody coming to help nobody's coming to help if you have a kid only you can stop it their friends

00:42:43.760 won't stop them from doing fentanyl the dealers won't stop them the government won't stop them

00:42:48.560 neither government not republican not democrat it's not going to happen so you're on your own

00:42:54.800 don't wait for the government and if you have addiction in the family a kid if you have a kid

00:43:00.000 who's addicted i don't know if all of you know this the government won't do anything

00:43:05.600 there is no service you have to have a addict in your house and you can't kick him out

00:43:12.000 do you notice like to have a drug addict in your house that you can't kick out

00:43:20.000 it's really bad it's really really bad so you're on your own for fentanyl you're on your

00:43:24.720 own for tick tock apparently i don't think there's any chance the ban will get passed

00:43:29.040 um you're on your own for the uh failing schools so maybe if you can get them homeschooled or something

00:43:36.560 but you're on your own because the government basically has given up on school and you're on

00:43:42.480 your own for the border crisis um meaning that you you know obviously you can't personally board to

00:43:48.880 guard the border but um as bill ackman said his neighbor you assume bill ackman lives in a good

00:43:56.720 neighborhood he's a billionaire he just tweeted or posted that his neighbor got burgled and uh

00:44:06.800 uh oh i've been i've been cautioned not to call it burglary it's an undocumented visitor 1.00

00:44:13.440 who has your stuff it's very different very different so yeah uh you should probably arm yourself

00:44:20.240 um two of my neighbors houses have been hit by the migrant uh bands and when i say my neighbors 0.99

00:44:27.920 i mean really close neighbors i'm not talking in my zip code i'm talking

00:44:33.840 i can hit him with a rock two of them and burgled so you know we are of course locally hardening our

00:44:42.960 defenses so our my neighborhood is organized into practically a paramilitary organization

00:44:51.920 that's true but the my neighborhood has only one entry and one exit you know there's not a second way to

00:44:57.840 get out and we're going full paramilitary now we don't talk about weapons because we're connected

00:45:06.400 digitally so nobody talks about weapons smartly right so no no mention of weapons but um our organization

00:45:15.600 organization for uh spotting people who don't belong is really tight i'll tell you if you park your truck on

00:45:24.560 our street and somebody doesn't recognize it because we don't really have a street parking here except

00:45:29.200 visitors um you're gonna get you're gonna get surrounded pretty quickly so my neighborhood has

00:45:36.080 just decided to go screw the government screw the police we're on our own and i think you're gonna see

00:45:42.480 a lot of that so the government isn't coming to help on any of those things uh fentanyl tick tock

00:45:48.160 failing schools or the border of crisis so you better harden your home defense

00:45:54.320 you know the news uh the uh fire department in new york was some event in which letitia james the 0.99

00:46:00.800 attorney general attended as a speaker and she was booed booed by a number of firefighters and what will

00:46:07.520 happen um as end wokeness reports on x uh the firefighters are asked to turn themselves in or risk

00:46:14.400 being hunted down that's right more republicans are being hunted for having a free speech opinion

00:46:23.120 that the attorney general is a horrible horrible criminal and should be in jail so you can't have

00:46:30.480 that opinion apparently you'll lose your job and you'll be hunted down so one of my best predictions

00:46:38.240 unfortunately correct that republicans are being hunted every day

00:46:45.120 all right here's my advice for the republicans if they want to win everything

00:46:51.760 if you want to lose everything just keep doing what you're doing on abortion and ivf 0.63

00:46:58.640 but it would be real easy not to so let me make a suggestion just in case republicans want to win

00:47:06.320 everything forever because it's really right there for them to take now i know you're not going to do

00:47:13.600 it and i know from prior conversations that i'm just going to get screamed at in the comments

00:47:20.400 the republicans would win everything if they simply say abortion should be decided by women 0.98

00:47:28.320 not just in the moment you know that's if it's legal you know with their doctor but what the law should be

00:47:35.040 now i know what you're saying scott it's murder everybody has a an interest in murder yes you do

00:47:44.080 and your interest is exactly the same as the women's there are women republicans and there are women 0.97

00:47:49.760 democrats and your opinions aren't that different than the women in your party but if you can just 0.81

00:47:57.760 allow the democrat women who are primarily running the democrat party to feel that you've at 0.97

00:48:04.800 least given them that women should be the primary decision makers about what happens to women's 1.00

00:48:11.840 bodies now you say to yourself no no we all must be involved because it's murdering children

00:48:19.600 it's still murdering children no matter who's talking it's still the same argument you don't need

00:48:25.440 to be in it you're not so special your little voice about this topic probably doesn't make any

00:48:31.680 difference to anybody just like mine does and shouldn't so if the only thing you're adding

00:48:38.000 is killing the chances of your political party to win why are you doing it do you think that your

00:48:45.120 opinion will change anything now you now i'm not saying you shouldn't vote you vote any way you want but

00:48:52.560 when you're talking about it the only way you can talk about it and be

00:48:56.640 uh both morally and ethically pure but also maybe win is to say you know you have an opinion but you're

00:49:06.160 going to defer to the women in your party because they say the same thing you do but it's more credible

00:49:11.600 coming from them so you might say i'm not going to back down one inch and you certainly have that

00:49:17.520 right and i wouldn't try to talk you out of it so yeah let me make this clear i'm not suggesting what you

00:49:24.160 should do it probably sounded like that didn't it it's not a recommendation it's not a recommendation

00:49:30.960 because i know you won't do it i'm just saying that the republican party is a millimeter away from

00:49:39.040 winning everything presidency and you know both sides of congress and already have a dominant position

00:49:46.960 the courts so if the republicans wanted to win everything and then fix everything they could fix

00:49:56.640 there's a way to do it just let the women take the lead the republican women and as ben say we're 1.00

00:50:03.040 going to support the women but let them do the speaking and just pipe down just pipe down because 0.96

00:50:11.920 your point of view will be completely better expressed by people who are in a better position

00:50:18.320 to express it right so if you think that you being quiet and taking a you know taking a step back and

00:50:25.680 letting women take the lead if you think that gets you to a worse place what's wrong with you 1.00

00:50:33.840 you think women are not good at advocating for what they want in what world is that a problem 1.00

00:50:39.520 women are really really good at advocating for what they want like really really really good so why 1.00

00:50:46.160 do you think you would be damaged in any way just because your own opinion wasn't in the public sphere

00:50:52.640 you know so i think you have to worry about not worry but consider whether your need to have an opinion

00:51:00.480 on this topic is based on your best assessment of your risks and your rewards

00:51:07.200 if you're if you're coming at it purely from a moral standpoint i do respect it yeah i completely

00:51:16.560 respect a moral only position just know that the trade-off is that you don't get to win everything

00:51:24.240 and you could you're a millimeter away from owning the government but you've you've put up an obstacle

00:51:32.160 to yourself that i think is pretty hard to get past all right um i don't want to hear arguments

00:51:40.000 about uh men are responsible too because that's off point i don't want to hear that men have good

00:51:46.000 opinions too because that has nothing to do with my point you're you all have good opinions that's not

00:51:51.920 the question it's just do you want to win that's it if you want to win there's an easy way to do it

00:51:58.240 and you don't give up anything in the process all right um here's some numbers i put on migrant crime

00:52:07.120 might be useful um 20 of american women and that's probably a low number have experienced an attempted

00:52:15.760 or completed rape in your experience isn't that number low maybe it's you know maybe rape is too 1.00

00:52:25.360 specific and it should be you know all the sexual attacks uh i feel like i feel like the number of

00:52:32.640 women who have had some kind of sex crime against them would be well over half isn't it isn't it well 1.00

00:52:41.040 over half am i so wrong about that and i'm just saying observationally and anecdotally anecdotally

00:52:49.840 um if i were to you know just randomly pick 10 women do you think only two of the 10 i randomly 0.97

00:52:58.160 picked would say they'd ever had um a kind of a sexual attack i feel like it'd be half is your

00:53:05.440 experience different i'm looking at your comments i i feel half have been had some kind of sex crime

00:53:13.360 against them that they didn't necessarily report all right but let's use the lower number let's say

00:53:20.400 that the 20 is is more of a you know definitely that was rape kind of a number or attempted rape

00:53:28.000 what happens if you double the number of men in your zip code but not the number of women

00:53:32.720 hypothetically if you just magically doubled the number of men but no extra women wouldn't it

00:53:45.120 if if the number if the people coming in the extra men had the same rate of rape which is about one

00:53:51.280 percent one percent of men admit being rapists which also sounds low frankly it feels like it's

00:53:58.720 higher than one percent but let's say it's one percent if you brought in um 10 million migrants

00:54:07.680 and that's probably a low number because you know there's a lot that we just can't count because they

00:54:12.800 get away uh but let's say that the the number who are just men were 10 million there are women and

00:54:19.600 children but let's just say the adult men were most of it and 10 million just for back of the envelope

00:54:25.680 calculations and you could you could tweak these as you want but one percent of 10 million would be

00:54:31.520 a hundred thousand extra rapists

00:54:35.680 and if a lot of men came into your neighborhood your rate of rape could it go from 20 percent of 0.95

00:54:42.080 women to 40 percent because you doubled the number of men but not the double number of women

00:54:47.040 am i doing the math right now i know it's not as straightforward as that but is the is the

00:54:54.160 generally directionally do i have the math right not technically but directionally does that sound

00:55:00.080 right to you if you double the number of men if those men have the same average rape percentage 0.99

00:55:07.200 as all the other men who are already here you know which is another conversation then wouldn't it

00:55:12.960 double your odds of rape how would it not i mean how could it not do that but now again you but you

00:55:22.400 know you're not going to double the number of men in any zip code so you adjust that as well but uh

00:55:29.440 you know i'm not going to get into the the argument about whether the migrants have a higher rape rate

00:55:35.360 right right because whether that's true or not um you can make the entire argument just by number of men

00:55:46.160 if you add the number of men your rape should go up so i would say a hundred thousand extra rapists

00:55:54.000 and um a lot of rapists are serial rapists so of the hundred thousand that doesn't mean a hundred thousand

00:56:02.560 extra rapes because you know maybe five percent of them are the multiples they're they're doing

00:56:08.880 twice as much so a hundred thousand rapists might be you know two hundred thousand extra rapes per year 1.00

00:56:17.280 now biden has to justify two hundred thousand extra rapes for the benefit that we're um being kind to

00:56:26.240 the immigrants because we're we're an immigrant country and that's not nothing you know the reason

00:56:33.120 that so many of us have mixed opinions is that immigration is not only a positive if you do it right

00:56:41.120 it's an essential it's way beyond optional it's essential we really couldn't have a country with our

00:56:48.800 birthright unless we had some robust um and you know look at the number of um immigrants from the 1.00

00:56:56.400 past who are now ceos of major unicorn companies i mean we're way better off because of past migration

00:57:04.560 but the part that you do right right you want to do it right

00:57:09.680 so here's how that's how i'd argue it and if i were uh if i were trying to make this case about the

00:57:15.840 danger coming in i would make sure i used both percentages and um numbers what do i say when

00:57:24.000 people only use percentages that's how you lie you leave out the raw number what do i say when people

00:57:30.240 only use the raw number that's how you lie because you're leaving out the percentage so if you're going

00:57:35.760 to use this argument don't use one or the other don't use just the number and don't use just the

00:57:41.840 percentage you put them together and then that's a real argument now people can reject it you know

00:57:49.600 there there might be democrat women who say you know what 200 000 extra rapes to protect uh 10 million 1.00

00:57:58.160 extra people who are in a bad way uh i'll take that deal but they need to say it out loud

00:58:05.200 just make the case because you know we're adults we get to argue the real world the real world is

00:58:13.520 this is a trade-off and it's not the only trade-off it's one trade-off so let people say you know put

00:58:20.560 the democrats on the uh let's say on the i don't want to say defensive but make them make them explain

00:58:28.720 why this is what they want do you do you think you could get the democrat women to say yes i understand

00:58:37.040 there will be 200 000 extra rapes per year probably per year um but i'm okay with that because the benefit 0.98

00:58:47.920 is even greater

00:58:51.840 now that's that that is the balance you you don't get to say that it's all benefit no cost

00:58:58.320 you have to say i understand the costs i understand the benefits and i choose this one

00:59:04.160 because i do like if if if i were to analyze the cost of closing the border completely

00:59:12.400 i would throw in the fact that it would really screw a lot of companies that depend on that labor

00:59:17.840 that's a cost it's real it's big so just make sure you're doing all the costs and all the benefits

00:59:24.240 and then make them defend it ted cruz went ballistic enemy in a hearing uh he went ballistic

00:59:33.040 on mayorkis i think it's a current um a new video but i i guess ted cruz was showing the wristbands

00:59:43.520 that the migrants are getting from the cartels the cartels are so organized that they have wristbands

00:59:48.960 with different colors to indicate you know what kind of migrant you are so that the cartels 0.57

00:59:53.680 themselves can sort them out on either end and apparently mayorkis if i understood this right

01:00:00.160 was not aware of the wristband program

01:00:02.640 and and ted cruz just went nuts on him for being well for being mayorkis and not even understanding

01:00:13.760 how deep this problem is because part of these wristbands um i only saw a summary of the story but

01:00:21.200 maybe you could give me a confirmation was ted cruising ted cruz saying so this is a question not a

01:00:27.520 statement was ted cruz saying that some of those wristbands were worn by people who were intended to

01:00:34.320 be sexually trafficked the children is do i have that right because i don't know if i have that right

01:00:41.760 i need a confirmation of that did he say that some of them because there were different kinds of

01:00:46.480 wristbands were some of them literally for sex trafficking

01:00:54.160 i'm not i'm not entirely sure if that was but well i'm seeing okay i'm seeing some yeses

01:01:00.880 i do think that's what it was now i think that's the attack vector that's the strongest attack vector

01:01:07.360 um well um so zero edge is uh mocking the jobs reports um you know the old thing where the jobs

01:01:18.640 reports come out and biden says my god it's the best jobs report ever re-elect me and then a month

01:01:25.120 later it gets lowered and then the month after it gets lowered a little bit again and then nobody notices

01:01:30.960 lowering even though people scream about it you know nobody it's never a news story and apparently

01:01:37.920 according to zero hedge uh they do it for everything you know jobs something called jolts

01:01:43.600 i don't even know what that is new home sales housing starts industrial production pc and core pc

01:01:51.120 price consumer price stuff so apparently all of our data that comes from the government is fake

01:02:00.240 it's knowingly fake it's knowingly fake and a lot of it is like the jobs report a lot of it is

01:02:10.080 migrants getting jobs and part-time jobs that aren't as good and 1.00

01:02:14.240 government jobs that we wish we were not increasing the number of so 1.00

01:02:20.640 it's true that our jobs report and all our economic data is fake

01:02:24.320 and it's true that the new york times bestseller list is fake and it's true that the reasons for

01:02:34.640 banning or not wanting to ban tick tock are fake but you know what's lucky thank god our climate models

01:02:45.360 are dependable am i right because with everything else being fake you know it's just so lucky that

01:02:55.680 the climate models are real no ladies and gentlemen i'm being sarcastic climate models have one and

01:03:01.760 only one purpose the purpose of a climate model is to launder your assumptions you do not use a climate

01:03:10.640 model to tell you what's going to happen in the future because i'm going to have to do a biden whisper on

01:03:17.760 this yeah permission to do a biden whisper

01:03:23.840 all right i'm going to do a biden whisper

01:03:25.920 the reason you use climate models is not because climate models can predict the future

01:03:41.920 because nothing can

01:03:46.000 nothing can predict the future why did anybody ever believe that

01:03:50.160 if you could predict the future of the climate you could predict anything

01:03:58.480 that's the hardest one if you could get that one right everything else is easy

01:04:03.440 no the purpose of climate models is to launder your assumptions that other people would just say

01:04:10.960 i don't think that's true here's an assumption uh glaciers is going to melt all the polar bears

01:04:16.240 going to die your uh your uh sea level rise you're all going to be underwater well can you prove it

01:04:24.080 well i can't prove the future well then why would i believe anything you say have you seen my climate

01:04:32.000 models and then they convince you that the models are something like science the models are not science

01:04:39.200 those are you just your assumptions that you launder through this complicated thing

01:04:44.640 so that people think there's some science to it

01:04:48.720 that's what that is all right here's an update on rafa the southern city in gaza that israel wants to

01:04:58.800 you know clean it out and go in there but they're holding off and trying to get the residents out i guess

01:05:04.080 the residents are not willing to leave or enough of them um and there's talk about hostage exchange but

01:05:11.920 none of that's going to happen and there's talk about the u.s building a pier so that we can drop off

01:05:17.760 lots of food to the palestinians

01:05:21.840 does that sound like a good idea to you

01:05:23.840 do you know that the palestinians are not lacking for food what they're lacking for is a way to uh not 1.00

01:05:33.840 have it stolen by hamas but there's food so the united states is not solving the right problem

01:05:43.520 apparently we didn't have a lack of food to give them there was enough food in the area

01:05:47.840 it's just that they can't get it in you know if the residents would leave the area

01:05:54.160 then they could all be fed but you know they're they're sticking with it i guess

01:06:01.280 anyway so biden has said uh that if israel the military goes into rafa

01:06:07.120 while those civilians are mostly still there he says it's a red line

01:06:12.400 um now what is a red line there's a red line you're going to do something to israel

01:06:17.840 so if they cross that red line like that's that's the definition of a red line in politics right a red

01:06:23.200 line is if somebody crosses it oh you're in trouble you're in trouble if you cross that red line so

01:06:30.320 what's going to happen biden says it is a red line but i'm never going to leave israel

01:06:35.440 the defense of israel is still critical so there is no red line

01:06:42.640 oh so there is no red line i'm going to cut off all weapons so they don't have the iron dome to

01:06:48.000 protect them so basically it's a red line but not one that has any consequences

01:06:56.560 that that would be called the opposite of a red line that would be like a nothing

01:07:01.040 all right now i'm not saying you know that he should have consequences i'm just saying he's

01:07:07.920 talking nonsense he wants to have it both ways there's a red line but there's no penalty for

01:07:12.480 crossing the red line that's like not a red line

01:07:17.920 anyway um part of that story is that biden said he didn't want to see another 30 000 people killed in

01:07:26.240 gaza do you see the problem with that tell me the problem biden says he doesn't want to see

01:07:33.680 another 30 000 killed in gaza there's a problem with that oh yeah 30 000 is hamas's estimate

01:07:44.000 which israel will tell you not so reliable which means that biden has embraced the number that is

01:07:51.360 repeated the most the hamas number now israel can't counter that because they don't produce their

01:07:59.280 own number so they can't say no no the real number is whatever because probably the real number is too

01:08:05.200 big as well right if it turned out the real number is 20 000 is that going to fundamentally change how you

01:08:11.840 feel about the situation you know the big numbers we don't register so differently so the hamas propaganda

01:08:20.320 has worked the hamas propaganda that it was 30 000 so far which we have no idea how accurate

01:08:27.520 or not that is biden has now referred to it as though that's the metric to refer to

01:08:36.640 hamas wins propaganda victory so ladies and gentlemen

01:08:43.200 amazingly somehow i completed this using nothing but lte on my phone uh later this afternoon

01:08:50.960 um my internet company says they'll come out and fix the problem they say is on their end and then maybe

01:08:58.640 maybe we'll have uh solutions all right and uh that's all i got for today is there anything i forgot

01:09:07.360 any story i forgot to mention

01:09:08.880 um

01:09:12.240 um

01:09:12.960 i'm just seeing lots of insults of biden

01:09:16.800 lots of biden insults

01:09:17.840 do you think i should reissue my book win bigly for this election season because it's all about trump's

01:09:27.200 persuasion powers and everything i said seems doubly true now

01:09:32.000 um

01:09:36.480 um yeah we're all suffering from the daylight savings time issue

01:09:40.080 all right um i'm just reviewing your comments it looks like we've covered everything another

01:09:50.880 amazing great show and we will see you

01:09:54.240 um

01:09:56.800 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 10, 2024

Episode 2409 CWSA 03⧸10⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript