Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 11, 2024


Episode 2410 CWSA 03⧸11⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 22 minutes

Words per Minute

152.91846

Word Count

12,591

Sentence Count

907

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

28


Summary

Xfinity's internet is failing and they can't figure out what's going on. They call in a tech to fix it, and it's worse than when he showed up. So what do they do next?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 All right, good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:08.720 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels
00:00:12.800 that I don't even think you can understand, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or
00:00:16.820 a glass of tank or chalice this time, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:21.620 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:23.060 I like coffee.
00:00:24.360 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure that dopamine at the end of the day, the thing
00:00:27.900 that makes everything better.
00:00:29.400 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it's going to happen right now.
00:00:35.300 Go.
00:00:39.080 Well, that was pretty good.
00:00:40.660 I got to admit, excellent sip.
00:00:44.780 All right, well, we don't know what's going to happen today in this show because I'm using
00:00:50.700 5G off my phone to live stream.
00:00:53.640 So far, so good.
00:00:55.120 I've got a solid three bars on my phone.
00:00:57.240 If you've ever tried to get anything repaired at your house lately, you've probably run into
00:01:03.860 what could be called the incompetence crisis.
00:01:07.240 So I've got Xfinity internet service, which goes out every few minutes in my account.
00:01:15.120 Don't know why.
00:01:16.240 I've had my equipment guy check all of the equipment and isolate it.
00:01:19.760 It doesn't seem to be on my end.
00:01:21.160 Xfinity keeps sending me messages that say, oh, there's a problem on our end.
00:01:26.420 Can we send out a tech?
00:01:29.220 Followed by a message that says, there's no problem on our end.
00:01:32.480 Do you want to cancel the tech?
00:01:34.480 Followed by, the tech will be there soon.
00:01:37.420 Followed by, there's no problem if you want to cancel it because there's nothing wrong with
00:01:40.860 our network.
00:01:42.220 Followed by the tech arriving and saying, oh, there's plenty wrong with this network.
00:01:45.560 Nothing wrong with your side, but I'll change this wire.
00:01:50.080 So he changes the wiring somewhere in the external part of my home from the street to the house.
00:01:56.740 And then he says, it's all working now.
00:01:58.920 And then I say, how do you know it's working?
00:02:02.540 Well, you can check yourself.
00:02:04.200 It's working.
00:02:05.080 And then I said, you know, the problem is intermittent outages, right?
00:02:09.880 So showing me that it's working is not actually showing me that it's working because the moment
00:02:16.500 you drive away, it's going to quit.
00:02:19.400 Oh, but I changed the thing that was the problem.
00:02:21.920 So you can see it's working.
00:02:23.580 I told you I isolated the problem and fixed it.
00:02:26.620 So you're good to go.
00:02:28.540 So as he was driving away, the internet failed completely and continues to be worse than it
00:02:33.740 was when he showed up.
00:02:34.520 So if you've worked with any technology companies, you are aware of what happens next.
00:02:41.080 Do I have to tell you what happens next?
00:02:44.860 Easy.
00:02:46.360 I will contact them.
00:02:47.500 They'll say the problem must be with your internal wiring that we can't service or possibly
00:02:52.360 your equipment.
00:02:54.380 I'll call my equipment guy and my inside wiring guy and they'll say, I don't see any problems.
00:02:58.820 It's got to be in the network.
00:02:59.660 And then you're going to say, but why don't you look at Starlink?
00:03:04.660 Well, I have a little too slow for my needs.
00:03:08.680 And I don't have any other terrestrial internet services that are fast enough.
00:03:13.660 So I can't get the good stuff anywhere else.
00:03:16.000 So I'm going to use my usual technique, which is I'm going to shit tweet Xfinity until it's
00:03:22.200 their highest priority.
00:03:25.020 That's right.
00:03:25.600 Every single fucking day, I could say Xfinity is failing and their internet is shit and
00:03:33.120 it's not working until they decide it's a high enough priority to get it fixed.
00:03:37.940 Now, I don't know what else to do.
00:03:42.320 I mean, I could call them every day and have them tell me they can't find the problem, which
00:03:46.740 basically has been going on for years.
00:03:48.780 Now, do you think this is isolated to Xfinity?
00:03:53.080 No.
00:03:54.140 As I've said before, I've put in maybe five different home theater setups with complicated
00:04:01.680 AV.
00:04:02.640 It's never worked once.
00:04:04.540 Probably five different companies I give up eventually.
00:04:08.480 It never works even the moment they drive away.
00:04:13.000 Every time.
00:04:14.640 So no surprise.
00:04:15.620 Anyway, enough about me.
00:04:17.460 There's a new indication that there were 10,000, according to Nature, a science journal,
00:04:26.260 10,000 studies were retracted in 2023.
00:04:29.200 It's a new record.
00:04:31.040 10,000 studies that passed peer review done by actual scientists got retracted because they
00:04:40.660 were not apparently credible.
00:04:44.100 It's a new record.
00:04:45.640 So what do you make of that?
00:04:47.580 Does that tell you that things are worse than ever?
00:04:51.460 No.
00:04:53.600 If there's one thing I want to teach you this year, it's that if somebody tells you a number
00:04:58.840 without a percentage or a percentage without a number, it's propaganda or it's BS or it's
00:05:05.600 bad work.
00:05:06.920 So when they say that 10,000 studies were retracted and it's a new record, is that bad?
00:05:12.460 You don't know unless you don't know unless you don't know unless you know the percentage.
00:05:17.040 If 10,000 is 1% of all the studies, even if it was bigger than the year before, because let's say there are just more studies that year, that wouldn't be bad.
00:05:28.120 If it's 75%, 1%, you'd think that's really, really bad.
00:05:34.880 So even though this is one of those stories that seems to agree with my preconceived notions that there's a lot of bad studies, hearing the number without the ratio and not knowing if that's a big or a small percentage is useless.
00:05:51.840 How many of you, this is just a little check for you, how many of you knew before I told you that when I said there are 10,000 retractions and it's a new record, how many of you immediately said, that's not actually telling me anything?
00:06:05.580 How many of you knew that the moment you heard it?
00:06:08.360 Because that's what you should be doing.
00:06:09.700 I'm trying to get you to the point that the moment you hear the raw number without the percentage or the percentage without the raw number, you can't believe anything else that happens after that.
00:06:21.840 Yeah, so be alert.
00:06:26.640 There's also a study or some researchers said that the after-school activities for kids, you know, they're all packed up with tutoring and sports and music and clubs and stuff like that.
00:06:37.580 They say that it's not really helping them because the kids are so basically filled with stuff all day that that last hour of stuff is not really helping them.
00:06:50.040 They're basically full by the time they get done with school.
00:06:53.660 Their heads are full.
00:06:55.100 Now, did they need to do some research on this or could they have saved some money and just ask me?
00:07:02.580 Because asking me would have gotten you the same result.
00:07:05.760 Scott, do you think that the schools are organized in a way that's good for the children, good for their minds and their development and good for the families?
00:07:13.560 I would say, no, it seems to be organized for the opposite.
00:07:18.420 School and all the activities appear to be organized to destroy family life and drive you into divorce.
00:07:26.540 Now, I'm not saying that they planned it that way, but there's a famous, well, I guess it's getting more famous, saying that says that if a system gives you the same output time after time after time and nobody changes it, that the output is the intention.
00:07:44.960 You can't say, well, we didn't intend it to work out that way if year after year after year you keep doing the same thing and you know what you're getting.
00:07:54.700 Anybody who's a parent, with the exception of people who are maybe parents for the top 2%, if you're a top 2%er, you could probably handle all this stuff.
00:08:04.900 Yeah, I got A-plus, I got music, got it all.
00:08:09.440 I'm in the sport too.
00:08:10.880 But for 98% of kids, they just get overwhelmed and they don't have any family time.
00:08:15.820 There's no family dinner because everybody's driving everybody around.
00:08:18.540 The parents' lives are a living hell when they get done with their own work.
00:08:21.880 They're just driving, driving, sitting, watching, driving.
00:08:24.700 And it basically destroys all quality of life for no benefit whatsoever.
00:08:29.980 I knew that.
00:08:31.020 How many of you knew that?
00:08:31.940 How many of you were completely aware that the schools are set up to destroy your family?
00:08:38.820 I mean, it looks like it must be the intention.
00:08:43.620 Yeah.
00:08:44.020 But the top students, like if you've got an athletic kid, this stuff's great if they're really good at athletics.
00:08:51.740 It's just not the average.
00:08:54.500 Over in Finland, they've got a big project.
00:08:58.100 They're going to make a big battery on a sand.
00:09:00.320 So they're going to store a whole bunch of heat in a special kind of sand that just stores the heat well, and then they can reuse it later.
00:09:11.540 What if that works?
00:09:12.800 It's not ordinary sand.
00:09:14.240 There's some kind of special sand, but not that rare.
00:09:17.620 So what if that works?
00:09:18.880 I love the idea of using dirt for a battery, special sand.
00:09:25.560 But Finland also has a project to make a gravity battery.
00:09:29.040 So the first kind just stores heat, which can then be converted to energy.
00:09:33.340 But the second kind uses an abandoned mine and a big weight that goes down the mine downhill to create energy, because anything moving can be used to harness energy.
00:09:47.980 And then during the day when the energy is cheap, or I guess at night when the energy is cheap.
00:09:55.840 No, it must be during the day because they're using solar.
00:09:58.060 They'll pull the weight up the mine, and then when they need the energy, they'll let it go back down.
00:10:03.480 So two different technologies in Finland.
00:10:07.700 Kind of promising.
00:10:10.760 All right.
00:10:11.140 York University, we'll get to that political news.
00:10:15.740 There's fun science today.
00:10:19.060 They said, best case scenario for the highest life satisfaction.
00:10:22.980 So they looked at different demographics and lifestyles, and they found out that the happiest people are this.
00:10:30.420 You're married, happy.
00:10:33.860 Oh, this is for women, I think, specifically.
00:10:36.460 For women, you're married.
00:10:37.540 You're married, you're happy with your personal appearance, because the thing they found is that your appearance has more to do with your overall happiness than almost anything.
00:10:47.000 And if you've got excellent health and consider yourself upper class, you're most likely to be happy.
00:10:54.220 Huh.
00:10:55.320 Well, now that's completely surprising.
00:10:56.980 People who are in a good marriage, good health, good looking, and good social life, and also lots of money, either upper class.
00:11:12.820 Now, somehow, quite surprisingly, they're happier than other people.
00:11:17.140 Now, who saw that coming?
00:11:19.200 Who saw that coming, huh?
00:11:21.540 I don't know.
00:11:22.280 Well, let's add this to, you could have asked Scott.
00:11:26.940 I think I could have told you this and saved you a bunch of money.
00:11:31.620 Yeah.
00:11:33.520 Well, there's a new robot restaurant.
00:11:35.860 It's a vegan restaurant.
00:11:38.580 One of the founders of Chipotle, I guess, or the founder.
00:11:41.720 He's experimenting with it, and it's got a big robot arm, and it only has three staff members, because the robot does a lot of the work.
00:11:47.800 And it kind of makes sense to make a vegan restaurant with robots, because if you're a vegan, you don't like to be around a lot of meat.
00:11:58.280 And the employees are made of meat, almost entirely.
00:12:01.960 A little bit of bones, but mostly meat.
00:12:03.960 And so, you can get rid of a lot of the meat, including the food, as well as the employees with that robot.
00:12:13.480 Now, here's something that's been my biggest pet peeve, so much so I even tried to start a startup at one point to fix it.
00:12:21.000 But the amount of work to buy food, bring it home, prepare it, store it, put it in my mouth, and clean up is crazy.
00:12:32.000 It's crazy.
00:12:33.200 And the expense of it all, how many times a potato has to change hands before it gets in my stomach.
00:12:40.700 Do you know how much work a potato has to do to get into my body?
00:12:43.980 A lot of work.
00:12:45.020 So, I would like to see robots take the whole concept of getting food into my body and make it a lot easier.
00:12:53.540 So, this might be a working step in the right direction.
00:12:57.920 How many of you have largely given up on cooking an actual meal every night, rather just grab a sandwich or something?
00:13:06.420 Have any of you just said, this is just crazy.
00:13:09.060 I'm not going to make a meal every night.
00:13:11.900 I just wonder, is it common?
00:13:13.420 Because it's been a long time since I was in any kind of family situation where there was like a family meal.
00:13:21.140 You know, part of it is a school thing, because nobody's available at the same time.
00:13:25.300 You can't have a family meal if the kids are always doing an activity.
00:13:30.640 Yeah.
00:13:31.620 Yeah, I think the whole idea of the family dinner has sort of disappeared for maybe half of the country or more.
00:13:38.400 Well, the military is going to go hard in drones.
00:13:42.920 We're going to make 1,000 drones for the Air Force.
00:13:46.580 And I guess one of the big uses of the drones would be to escort our human planes, like the B-21 and the F-35.
00:13:54.480 I guess you all saw that coming, but the big story is it's happening fast.
00:13:58.900 And as soon as they put AI in there, we're all dead.
00:14:01.800 I think we all know that because we saw the movie.
00:14:03.520 All right.
00:14:06.700 Elon Musk has a good quote today that I think sums up everything.
00:14:11.660 He said, trying to help people, well, it's not his own quote.
00:14:15.180 He just posted it.
00:14:16.720 Trying to help people understand what's going on right now is, you know, what's going on in the world, basically, the country.
00:14:23.680 Trying to help people understand what's going on right now is like going back into a burning building to pull someone out,
00:14:29.660 only to have them keep punching you in the face and demand evidence that the burning is on fire,
00:14:35.120 even after they admit they can see the flames.
00:14:39.280 Doesn't that feel like what it is?
00:14:43.480 It literally feels like the world is burning.
00:14:46.720 And when you talk to people, say, hey, the world is burning.
00:14:50.020 You know, can we help you out?
00:14:52.340 They'll say, I'm fine.
00:14:54.780 And they'll say, can you see the flames?
00:14:56.640 Yeah.
00:14:57.580 Yeah.
00:14:57.880 What's going on here?
00:15:00.500 Why do you not want to get away from the flames?
00:15:03.760 What's going on?
00:15:05.040 And I would say that the shorter version of this is cognitive dissonance.
00:15:09.620 Cognitive dissonance is when you have created a, let's say, a decision around who you believe you are.
00:15:17.160 You're a nice person, so you must back nice things, for example.
00:15:20.540 Then you find out the nice thing isn't so nice.
00:15:22.880 And you don't want to change your mind because you like to be consistent.
00:15:25.060 So I do think a big part of the problem is people are not seeing the obvious because it's hard.
00:15:33.900 Well, Bitcoin is zooming up again.
00:15:36.100 Is it still up?
00:15:37.280 This morning it was zooming.
00:15:38.440 What does it tell us that Bitcoin is zooming?
00:15:42.860 Number one, it's probably something about not trusting governments.
00:15:47.360 Because if I thought that the dollar was going to stay useful forever, I would own a lot less Bitcoin.
00:15:56.200 So I think Bitcoin is a vote against the government being effective in the long run.
00:16:03.640 But you also have the ETFs that are getting approved.
00:16:06.580 I guess Great Britain is looking at it too.
00:16:08.620 So a lot of people who would not have touched Bitcoin are now seeing it as an essential part of their portfolio.
00:16:14.200 So as people just add it for diversification, it will become valuable.
00:16:20.060 Now, how many of you remember for the past two years, I've been telling you that Bitcoin makes sense for diversification?
00:16:30.260 Because at some point the ETFs are likely to add it.
00:16:35.560 You know, unless something surprising happened.
00:16:37.860 And here we are.
00:16:38.540 So the ETFs, meaning the funds, are adding it.
00:16:42.000 And if the funds have to add it, there are going to be gigantic purchases, which drives up the price.
00:16:47.460 And that's what you see.
00:16:49.080 Among other animal spirits, there's a lot of psychology in it.
00:16:54.380 Well, my theme for the rest of the show is the enemy is inside the house.
00:16:59.280 The enemy is us.
00:17:00.980 That's the theme.
00:17:02.480 See if I can tie this together.
00:17:03.700 And story number one, according to Fox News, the January 6th committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump administration tried to get National Guard presence on January 6th.
00:17:18.880 Now, Liz Cheney, who was part of that January 6th committee, says that's flatly false.
00:17:25.380 But Liz Cheney is the least credible person in the world.
00:17:28.060 I think if I knew nothing other than Fox News says it's true and Liz Cheney says it's not true, who would you believe?
00:17:36.820 If the only thing you knew is Fox News versus Liz Cheney, which side do you take?
00:17:43.380 Well, the news is not the most reliable thing in the world.
00:17:48.040 But Liz Cheney is the least reliable thing in the world.
00:17:51.000 Now, I think, you know, this will be one where there's going to be some question about whether or not it was really suppressed or whether she thought it wasn't important and the committee thought it wasn't important.
00:18:06.760 So it wasn't that it was suppressed.
00:18:08.520 It was misinterpreted.
00:18:09.600 It's going to be one of those stories.
00:18:10.680 But since nothing that Liz Cheney says is anything but ridiculous, partisan bile, I think there's a greater chance that Fox News has the story right in this case.
00:18:23.540 There's a fund called Avanza, which, because it uses ESG, ESG is, you know, the standard where you make sure that you're doing good by the environment and you're hiring diverse staff, et cetera.
00:18:41.680 And one of the companies that didn't do well in the rankings and therefore Avanza decided they could not put money into it.
00:18:50.460 And you may have heard that this company is called NVIDIA, NVIDIA.
00:18:56.720 Yeah.
00:18:57.340 So there's a company that has actual U.S. people's money in it that said, hmm, NVIDIA.
00:19:04.460 You know, this might be something we'd invest in except for that they're weak on ESG.
00:19:11.520 So do you think the problem is the World Economic Forum likes ESG?
00:19:15.780 Is it a problem coming from all them strange-talking foreigners with their accents and stuff and making people go to Davos?
00:19:23.860 Or could it be that Americans are taking it too seriously and that's really the problem?
00:19:31.240 Don't we have the option of rejecting it?
00:19:34.800 Don't we?
00:19:35.920 We can't just say no.
00:19:37.120 Well, I would say this problem is coming from inside the house.
00:19:41.260 If you were an investor in this Avanza fund and you found out that they didn't invest in the number one best stock of all time so far, who knows what will happen after this, NVIDIA, and it was because of weak ESG, I think you'd have to say the problem is coming from inside the house.
00:19:57.800 Well, Mike Lindell is going to get his day in the Supreme Court.
00:20:03.080 I'm surprised, actually.
00:20:04.520 I don't know exactly what it is, but I think it's about election claims.
00:20:08.200 He says he's been waiting three years for it.
00:20:10.980 And he says, quote, the evidence we're going to drop, you're going to see on Friday, is the most explosive you've ever seen.
00:20:18.540 We're talking Kraken, people.
00:20:21.220 Kraken all over the place.
00:20:22.440 Now, I will give you my generic warning that if 100 claims are made about the 2020 election being rigged, you can guarantee that 95% of them are false at the minimum.
00:20:36.140 It could be 100%, but at minimum, 95% are going to be false.
00:20:40.940 I said that on the first day and lots and lots of times after it, and it's been true so far.
00:20:46.560 Now, does that mean that there aren't a bunch of real claims that will turn out to be, you know, explosive?
00:20:56.680 It doesn't mean that.
00:20:57.880 5% of the claims would still be a lot of claims, and you only need one to be right for the whole election to be different than it came out.
00:21:04.860 So it only takes one.
00:21:06.940 You only need one, and everything is different than what you thought it was.
00:21:10.680 So do we have one?
00:21:11.640 Well, if you follow the Rasmussen account almost, well, every single day, for weeks and weeks and months and years, actually, I think they've been showing you evidence that sure looks credible, but there's always that extra level of verification.
00:21:27.060 It's like, you've got to hear what the other side says.
00:21:31.080 So do you think the Supreme Court would have taken the case if there was nothing to it?
00:21:34.780 So I'm not sure if he's going to make election claims or some other kind of claims.
00:21:41.220 We don't know.
00:21:42.500 But if we live in a simulation, and if the Trump story is going to look like a three-part movie play, which it seems like it's shaping up to do, there's going to be, there has to be the magic point where Trump is right about the 2020 election being rigged.
00:22:01.740 Now, I don't personally have any proof that that's the case, that it was rigged.
00:22:07.840 Personally, I wouldn't know.
00:22:09.600 I would have no way of knowing.
00:22:11.220 But if it's a movie, it feels like every single indication, the cat's on the roof, Mike Lindell is going to the Supreme Court.
00:22:20.180 You know, there's court cases pending that have been delayed for reasons we don't understand.
00:22:26.040 There are ballots that are apparently, according to witnesses, are fake ballots, and they're locked in a room, and they won't be unlocked, but we don't know why there's a delay.
00:22:35.120 So there's a whole bunch of things.
00:22:38.300 Any one of them could be the Kraken.
00:22:40.720 So, you know, the Kraken would be the alleged big proof that the election was rigged.
00:22:49.480 We haven't seen it yet, to my satisfaction.
00:22:53.060 But I would say all the indications are it's coming.
00:22:59.000 I've never seen more foreshadowing for anything in my life.
00:23:02.860 Now, it doesn't guarantee that there's something out there that's corrupt, and it doesn't guarantee that if there is, we'd ever see it.
00:23:09.680 But it sure feels like it.
00:23:12.300 Is anybody having the same feeling?
00:23:14.500 That it just feels like, between now and November, something's going to break on that story about the 2020 election?
00:23:22.860 I don't know if I'd put money on it, but it sure feels like it.
00:23:27.440 Just things are kept that way.
00:23:30.040 All right, MSNBC is reporting that Joe Biden said, and I quote,
00:23:35.880 Every time he hears Trump speak, he gets juiced up.
00:23:40.340 He gets juiced up whenever he hears Trump speak.
00:23:44.620 Well, I think I need to hear more about that juice, because I think Kamala Harris is juiced up every time she hears Trump speak.
00:23:52.820 I don't know if it's the same juice.
00:23:54.880 Could be a different juice.
00:23:55.940 But whatever juice they're pumping into Biden might be a different juice they're pumping into Kamala, but they seem pretty juiced up to me.
00:24:07.160 All right.
00:24:08.440 Speaking of Rasmussen, they did a poll.
00:24:10.180 It says, 35% of likely U.S. voters say that if Trump wins this year's election, they would support Democrats in Congress refusing to certify the election results.
00:24:20.260 Is that the best?
00:24:24.820 That's just the best poll.
00:24:27.240 I love the fact that Rasmussen even asked that question.
00:24:30.240 It's just perfect, because 35% saying they wouldn't certify a Trump victory.
00:24:40.160 Now, keep in mind that the question does not suggest that there might have been something wrong with the election.
00:24:47.100 So, the question does not say, if you suspect that there was something wrong with the election, would you be against certifying it?
00:24:55.980 No.
00:24:56.520 It just says, would you be against certifying it?
00:24:59.260 Just if he wins.
00:25:02.180 So, there might be some assumptions embedded in people's answers, as in they might assume that that means it's rigged.
00:25:09.660 But that would sound a lot like the MAGA people, wouldn't it?
00:25:12.860 What percentage of the country do you think are MAGA Republicans?
00:25:16.760 Go.
00:25:18.060 What percentage of the country are MAGA Republicans?
00:25:22.400 35?
00:25:24.560 Is that high?
00:25:26.260 35%?
00:25:27.180 I think that's about the number of Republicans.
00:25:29.760 And the number of, you know, Trump-leaning Republicans is pretty close.
00:25:34.720 So, basically, it looks like there are a few more people who would support the Democrats doing exactly what the Republicans tried to do.
00:25:43.200 Except that the Republicans weren't trying to do that.
00:25:49.700 Were they?
00:25:50.300 Do you think the January 6th people were trying to prevent certification?
00:25:55.300 Well, it kind of depends what you mean by that.
00:25:59.580 If prevent means permanently prevent, that's not what the January 6th was asked for.
00:26:05.480 They did not ask for it to be permanently prevented.
00:26:08.360 They wanted a delay to make sure it was a good election.
00:26:11.940 But these Democrats don't say anything about a delay.
00:26:16.160 35% of voters, which would include some, apparently that would include some Republicans.
00:26:21.540 I don't know how many.
00:26:22.620 Not many, probably.
00:26:24.400 They would refuse to certify.
00:26:27.040 So, I guess there's no moral argument left.
00:26:29.320 And let me say again, the problem's coming from inside the house.
00:26:36.160 Yeah.
00:26:37.240 It's inside the house.
00:26:38.880 Well, something called the Academy Awards happened last night, which apparently is some kind of celebration of movies that I would not watch because they're all terrible.
00:26:47.480 I recognize zero movies that were nominated, and I have no intention of seeing any of them because the more likely it is to get an award, the less likely it's good entertainment because it means they packed it with crap.
00:27:07.720 But there are a number of stories that came out of it.
00:27:09.920 Number one, some guy named Jonathan Glazer got up there and he got Rupard.
00:27:15.320 Rupard is when you get taken out of context, so part of your comments are removed, to make it very different from what he actually intended.
00:27:25.060 So, let me tell you what he said, and then I'll tell you how he got Rupard.
00:27:29.840 He said, and by the way, I'm not agreeing with what he's saying.
00:27:33.380 I'm just telling you what he said.
00:27:34.820 He said, right now we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation that has led to conflict for so many innocent people.
00:27:45.320 So, his framing is that the Israel occupying that territory, so he would call it occupying, others would call it something else,
00:27:55.820 is basically it makes them feel bad because their Jewishness and the Holocaust are being cheapened.
00:28:06.040 So, basically he's saying that, you know, Jews and, you know, this big idea of the Holocaust are being cheapened by what's happening there.
00:28:14.620 That got taken out of context.
00:28:17.660 Now, just to be clear, I'm not saying he said something I agree with and then they reversed it.
00:28:24.460 I'm not saying that, but he did get taken out of context.
00:28:27.420 So, they dropped the second part where he says being hijacked by an occupation.
00:28:32.240 And it got reported as, right now we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust.
00:28:38.620 No.
00:28:40.640 They were not refuting their Jewishness and the Holocaust.
00:28:44.280 But that's how it got reported on social media by a lot of people that you follow probably.
00:28:49.800 Now, what he did say might be equally odious and terrible to the people who are his critics,
00:28:55.020 but it wasn't what he said.
00:28:58.400 Just to be clear, that wasn't what he said.
00:29:04.300 Interestingly, you know, you always hear people saying that Hollywood is, you know, run by Jews.
00:29:12.940 I'm not saying that.
00:29:14.120 That's a common meme you hear.
00:29:16.740 Yet, it seemed like the biggest theme was pro-Hamas.
00:29:22.780 How do you explain that?
00:29:25.020 How do you get a job?
00:29:26.620 So, a number of the people who went to the Oscars were wearing pro-cease-fire messages.
00:29:34.760 So, a lot of them were pro-cease-fire.
00:29:36.840 Now, if you were Jewish, there's a good chance that you interpret pro-cease-fire.
00:29:41.780 Not everybody, of course.
00:29:43.000 Everybody's different.
00:29:44.380 But there would be a lot of Jewish people who would say that if you're pro-cease-fire,
00:29:49.000 you're kind of pro-Hamas because that's what they're asking for.
00:29:51.900 It's literally what they're asking for.
00:29:55.320 And, you know, that would give you the problem of how do you solve it in the long run if you do a cease-fire.
00:30:00.140 So, how do the actors who are pro-cease-fire ever get work again?
00:30:07.820 Is that going to be a problem?
00:30:08.860 Or if something happened in Hollywood that just opposited the whole town, where the town is full of Jewish actors and Jewish managers, etc.,
00:30:22.280 but they've all gone to, or a substantial number of them turned into cease-fire supporters, which would feel to many like Hamas supporters?
00:30:33.780 I don't know.
00:30:34.980 I feel like Hollywood has done every single thing they can to destroy their own industry.
00:30:40.420 So, the wokeness, you know, made it terrible to watch.
00:30:46.720 And, you know, movies are boring in general because other things are just more exciting these days and faster and get to the point faster.
00:30:53.400 So, movies are like a dead art form, in my opinion.
00:30:56.720 But then they add this thing.
00:30:59.200 Like, why do the Hollywood actors think that they need to be making comments about Israel during the Academy Awards?
00:31:06.600 Like, where do they get that idea?
00:31:07.860 You can't separate those a little bit?
00:31:11.780 Anyway, Jimmy Kimball was the host.
00:31:13.960 He was pretty cringy, according to people who don't like him.
00:31:17.800 But according to the wild, seal-like clapping in the audience to his bad jokes when he made fun of Trump being up past his jail time,
00:31:27.980 and then the audience went, oh, ho, ho, Trump in jail.
00:31:32.440 We so happy.
00:31:33.280 We so happy, Trump in jail.
00:31:36.080 So, it was disgusting.
00:31:37.860 On that level, that they were cheering for an innocent man to go to jail.
00:31:43.300 Innocent would be my opinion.
00:31:45.400 Innocent until proven guilty.
00:31:46.480 And then the biggest surprise of all, apparently there were guidelines for the Academy Awards to, and movie, well, guidelines for movies.
00:31:57.540 So, the guidelines for movies were to include a lot of diversity.
00:32:01.960 And they had pretty specific guidelines of, you know, make sure you've got at least two from this group and, you know, et cetera.
00:32:07.680 And then, after all that pro-diversity stuff, let's see how it went.
00:32:13.240 Peachy Keenan is reporting this on X.
00:32:15.700 Best Picture went to, well, that was an all-white cast.
00:32:19.080 All right.
00:32:19.240 Probably an anomaly.
00:32:20.960 The Best Supporting Actor went to a white guy.
00:32:23.400 Best Actor, though, went to, well, that was a white guy.
00:32:26.940 However, however, the Best Actress went to, well, a white woman.
00:32:31.660 But not to feel bad, because the Best Director went to, well, a white guy.
00:32:35.880 And, but, at least to redeem, the Best Director for short films went, well, a white guy.
00:32:42.660 So, a lot of white people won stuff.
00:32:44.320 I'm not complaining about it.
00:32:45.540 I'm just saying, how the hell did that happen?
00:32:50.100 Does Hollywood have some kind of a weird self-hatred internal revolution that's going on?
00:32:56.580 Is there a civil war in Hollywood?
00:32:59.000 I don't know what's going on.
00:33:00.340 I have no idea.
00:33:01.000 Also, the Best Song went to a white woman.
00:33:07.780 Do you all know Sean King, who is famous as a black activist, who many of his critics say,
00:33:18.240 Sean, you don't even look black.
00:33:19.980 I don't even think you're black.
00:33:22.680 So, that's one part of his story.
00:33:25.480 But apparently, he's up the ante, and he's become a, he's embraced Islam.
00:33:30.200 So, as of yesterday, Sean King is a Muslim.
00:33:34.420 So, he's a black Muslim.
00:33:37.860 So, so that's good.
00:33:40.200 So, I don't want to say that Sean King is the poor man's Andrew Tate, but I really do.
00:33:47.660 So, I'm going to say it.
00:33:49.380 Sean King is the poor man's Andrew Tate.
00:33:53.340 I just like saying people are the poor man's something.
00:33:55.920 It's always funny.
00:33:56.820 It's never, it's never not funny.
00:33:58.120 All right.
00:34:01.080 Meanwhile, Trump was posting on Truth during the Academy Awards, and Jimmy Kimmel actually
00:34:07.780 read his post live.
00:34:10.020 Here's what it was from Trump.
00:34:13.180 On Truth, he said,
00:34:14.360 Has there ever been a worse host than Jimmy Kimmel at the Oscars?
00:34:18.540 His opening was that of a less than average person trying too hard to be something he is not, and never can be.
00:34:24.240 Get rid of Kimmel and perhaps replace him with another washed up but cheap ABC talent, George Slopinopoulos.
00:34:32.500 George Slopinopoulos.
00:34:34.200 He would make everybody on stage look bigger, stronger, and more glamorous.
00:34:38.100 And he says, After a really bad politically correct show tonight, and for years, disjointed, boring, and very unfair, why don't they just give the Oscars to those that deserve them?
00:34:55.740 Maybe that way their audience and TV ratings will come back from the depths.
00:34:59.660 Make America great again.
00:35:00.740 Trump is never not funny.
00:35:07.080 It's like he doesn't have the capability to not be funny if, you know, if you like his whole act, right?
00:35:13.080 If you hate him, you hate him.
00:35:14.680 Let's talk about ABC News' George Slopinopoulos, who you know as Stephanopoulos.
00:35:21.020 So he got into it with Nancy Mace, Republican, on the show.
00:35:27.240 And it was fascinating because they both are – so both of them are really good with media, right?
00:35:34.220 George Stephanopoulos, obviously great understanding of media and how to use it, but a biased partisan for Democrats.
00:35:42.620 Nancy Mace, same thing.
00:35:45.040 Super good at all media things.
00:35:47.680 You know, the camera loves her, lots of good quotes and stuff.
00:35:51.020 So these are two people who really understand how the media works.
00:35:55.180 Do you know what people do when somebody who really understands the media and is partisan interview somebody else who really understands the media and is partisan?
00:36:04.420 Well, it was kind of hilarious because Nancy Mace kept trying to frame the questions from Stephanopoulos as, quote,
00:36:12.760 trying to shame a rape victim, which she repeated over and over and over again.
00:36:17.540 Meanwhile, Stephanopoulos was framing it as the jury found Trump liable for rape, which didn't happen in the real world, by the way.
00:36:28.700 But also what didn't happen in the real world is Stephanopoulos trying to shame Nancy Mace as a rape victim.
00:36:38.000 So both of them just continually repeated their claims, which were ridiculous.
00:36:44.520 They're both ridiculous.
00:36:45.380 But they're both so smart about the media that they know that all that mattered is what they repeated.
00:36:51.640 So they were actually just not even in the same conversation, and neither of them cared to fix it.
00:36:58.300 You have to see it.
00:36:59.380 It's fascinating.
00:36:59.920 You might, if you were a little less, let's say, informed about how things work, it would look like two people who couldn't have a conversation or somebody avoiding a question or somebody asking illegitimate questions and trying to score points.
00:37:17.000 That's sort of the old way to look at it.
00:37:18.940 But if you understand that the two people are brilliant at handling media events, brilliant.
00:37:25.720 I mean, they're top 1% easily.
00:37:28.640 Then you understand that they know that the audience can't follow an argument.
00:37:33.700 The audience can't follow any complicated argument.
00:37:37.860 So what you can do is just repeat over and over something you want them to hear.
00:37:44.060 So if you were a pro-Nancy Mace and you spent any one second looking at that video, you'd say, man, I hate that Slopinopoulos guy, to quote Trump.
00:37:53.860 He's trying to shame a rape victim.
00:37:56.960 I watched the whole thing.
00:37:58.240 Nothing like that happened.
00:37:59.560 Not even a little bit.
00:38:01.220 At the same time, did the jury find Trump liable for rape?
00:38:05.400 Nope.
00:38:05.960 Completely made up.
00:38:06.940 But he wants everybody to think that happened.
00:38:09.380 So what did happen?
00:38:11.300 Well, Byron York tries to explain what the jury did find.
00:38:16.180 And I think you can join me in saying, what?
00:38:20.640 All right, so here's Byron York trying to explain it.
00:38:27.600 He said, in fact, the jury specifically found Trump not liable for rape.
00:38:32.720 It found him liable for, quote, sexual abuse.
00:38:36.160 The judge later tried to spin the decision, citing laws that did not apply.
00:38:40.780 Okay, according to Byron York, laws did not apply, to argue that the jury implicitly found Trump liable for rape.
00:38:49.820 I don't even know what that sentence means.
00:38:53.420 Like, I understand that as English.
00:38:56.780 But, like, what's it really mean in the real world?
00:38:59.520 How in the world does a judge cite a law that doesn't exist to argue that the jury found in their own minds they were thinking something other than what they said?
00:39:11.460 But I guess something like that happened.
00:39:14.000 You know, Byron York is very credible in his analyses.
00:39:17.520 In the absence of an actual jury finding of rape, the judge guessed that the jury's decision necessarily implies rape.
00:39:26.440 Do you understand why Nancy Mace would not want to get into a decision about the details?
00:39:36.100 Because you can't explain the story and the details.
00:39:39.420 You could read that sentence like 15 times and go, I'm not exactly sure what.
00:39:46.720 Right?
00:39:47.400 Do any of you even understand that issue?
00:39:50.340 That the judge used a law that doesn't exist to read the minds of the jury?
00:39:54.640 What?
00:39:59.100 Anyway, so those are two good media pros at work.
00:40:04.620 Did you know that apparently half of the country is unaware, according to a recent survey, that the non-documented slash non-citizens get counted in the census?
00:40:19.540 Now, you might say to yourself, well, so what?
00:40:21.660 The census is just trying to figure out who's here.
00:40:25.180 So they're here.
00:40:26.420 Might as well count them.
00:40:28.220 So what you might not remember is that the census is in part, and maybe largely the main reason, is to figure out how many representatives are applicable.
00:40:40.100 So if they can, they being the Democrats, if they can pump up areas with extra non-citizens, then the census, when it rolls around, will say, hey, you need some extra representatives because you've got some extra people.
00:40:54.800 Those extra representatives would allow the Democrats to have a majority and rule forever as kings and queens.
00:41:01.800 The Trump administration, I guess, tried to get citizenship to be the only valid answer on the census, you know, so that it didn't have this distorting effect.
00:41:15.440 And Musk is pointing that out, Elon Musk.
00:41:21.040 And it's obvious that this is, isn't it obvious to you that this is all intentional?
00:41:27.620 I mean, that's what Musk is saying.
00:41:29.120 It's obviously intentional to pump up the power of the Democrats at any cost.
00:41:34.420 And the anti-cost would be extra crime, et cetera, and cost.
00:41:43.260 So you think the problem is the immigrants, right?
00:41:48.580 Do you think the problem is the migrants?
00:41:50.520 Do you think the problem is the cartel?
00:41:53.420 Do you think the problem is George Soros?
00:41:57.240 Well, to me, it looks like the problem is coming from inside the House because none of those things would matter.
00:42:03.180 If the Democrats didn't want it to happen because we would just have stronger laws, et cetera.
00:42:09.880 So the problem with migration is coming entirely from inside.
00:42:16.800 And it's intentional because if a system continues to give you one kind of output and you don't change it, that must be the output you want because you do have the ability to change it.
00:42:28.420 So we must assume that this plot to increase power at the cost of American citizens is exactly what it looks like.
00:42:38.560 Speaking of things that are exactly what they look like, do you remember me saying the only explanation for why we're not doing anything useful about fentanyl and about the border must be that the cartel is on our side?
00:42:51.280 Now, when I say our side, I mean must be working with American power interests, otherwise we would stop it.
00:42:59.200 And then Mike Benz, who has more information than I do, I was just looking at the system and saying, hey, if the system keeps giving you the same result and the government has the ability to change it but does nothing, that must be the result they want.
00:43:17.340 And therefore, they must be working with the cartels to control Mexico and Central America.
00:43:22.000 But I was just talking through my ass based on the system.
00:43:26.180 All I did was look at the output.
00:43:28.220 I simply looked at the output and said, all right, if nobody's trying very hard to change it, they must want it.
00:43:34.760 What could be the possible explanation for wanting this?
00:43:38.380 And the only explanation is that we're the ones doing it.
00:43:42.100 If it were coming only from the outside as a risk to Americans, we would have stopped it somehow.
00:43:47.680 But we're not even trying in a way that looks like trying.
00:43:51.700 You know, there's little stuff, but not really.
00:43:55.080 So Mike Benza says that the reason that the Department of Defense, CIA and the state and Department of Homeland Security, they all tried to stop Trump from building a border wall.
00:44:10.880 Because, as Mike Benza says, if we lose the cartels, we lose Latin America.
00:44:18.560 That's right.
00:44:21.100 We need the cartels for America to have control over the governments of other countries.
00:44:27.940 Because the only way we can control the governments is to control the cartels, because the cartels control the governments.
00:44:35.620 So basically, we are consciously, we meaning these groups of three-letter people, are consciously allowing 100,000 people to die from overdoses and consciously allowing us to be overrun with crime and migrants, because it gives us control over the other countries.
00:44:57.520 Now, is that a bad decision?
00:45:02.760 I'm going to surprise you, because it surprised me.
00:45:07.120 But as you know, I've been probably one of the most vocal critics about the border, as well as fentanyl, and not doing enough about it.
00:45:15.740 Because, in my opinion, it was a contributing factor to my stepson's overdose.
00:45:20.840 And so, I was really, really mad at the government for seeing the problem, much like Elon Musk points out.
00:45:28.980 You can see the flames.
00:45:30.880 Why aren't you trying to put them out?
00:45:33.000 And that was really frustrating to have, you know, a death in the family that looked like it, you know, could have been maybe, if not preventable, there could have been a lot more that could have been done.
00:45:42.940 And then, to watch nothing being done was, like, the worst, most painful feeling you can imagine.
00:45:50.960 That I couldn't stop it from happening to somebody else's kid.
00:45:55.320 I mean, really, that's all you have left.
00:45:57.020 All you have left when you lose your own kid is you can make something good out of it.
00:46:02.940 You know, you try to turn it into a positive at anything.
00:46:05.460 So, you know, maybe you do a charity.
00:46:07.120 A lot of people do stuff like that.
00:46:08.460 I thought my role would be to try to persuade tougher action against Mexico for the fentanyl specifically.
00:46:18.440 I can now see that that's a waste of energy.
00:46:21.760 I can now see that this was a conscious trade-off.
00:46:25.240 And a better way to see the death of all of the young people and other people dying from fentanyl is that they're effectively like conscripts.
00:46:34.100 In other words, it's like having a draft, except the draft is based on who got addicted.
00:46:41.560 So the people who got addicted are essentially war casualties.
00:46:46.860 Because the war in this case is to control the other countries by working with the cartels productively to do that.
00:46:53.080 And the expense of that, just like the expense of any war, would be the soldiers you lose.
00:46:58.400 And the soldiers in this case didn't sign up for it, except they kind of did.
00:47:05.600 You know what?
00:47:06.840 If you're an addict, you didn't sign up to die.
00:47:09.580 You didn't sign up to fight the cartels.
00:47:11.620 But you did sign up for something that was going to put you in the middle of that mix.
00:47:16.580 And you did sign up for something that gave you a pretty good risk of dying.
00:47:20.260 And it is true that people consciously put themselves in that situation.
00:47:26.860 And so I've actually had a change of opinion that when you know it's coming from inside the house, meaning that the drugs coming into the country are America's choice.
00:47:37.100 Then I see it as basically a forced conscription, like a draft, except that the addicts who were the ones who paid for the war, they pay for it literally by buying the drugs.
00:47:50.800 And it looks like our three-letter agencies probably share some of that and use it for bad gains.
00:47:58.980 But, yeah, so my stepkid was killed in this war that he didn't know he was in.
00:48:04.700 And so there's that.
00:48:10.660 And I actually feel different about it now because the thing I don't know is if we're better off.
00:48:17.540 I don't know if we're better off as a country by controlling Central and South America.
00:48:22.740 If we're doing it just for money or something, then, of course, it's the height of evil.
00:48:27.140 But if we're doing it because people who are a lot smarter than me say, you know, if we don't do this, it's going to be way worse.
00:48:32.700 It's going to be way worse if we don't do it.
00:48:35.480 Because they'll just, you know, Central and South America will, you know, have, I don't know, economic problems with the bad government.
00:48:43.260 And dictators will bring in Chinese rockets, you know, all kinds of problems.
00:48:48.420 So I don't know.
00:48:50.640 You know, I try to be a realist.
00:48:53.680 And I say, obviously, I didn't want my stepson to die.
00:48:58.300 But he did die the way I thought he did.
00:49:00.800 The way I thought he did was there were too many drugs and he took some.
00:49:05.660 It looks like the drugs are intentional.
00:49:08.040 It's the way they fund their control of other countries.
00:49:11.220 And that effectively he was a conscript.
00:49:14.620 You just didn't know.
00:49:16.320 Or you might say he was a volunteer, but he didn't know he was volunteering for that.
00:49:19.960 Well, what about those gangs in Haiti?
00:49:23.260 As you know, the government is, I don't know, disappeared in some other country.
00:49:30.220 The leader, I guess the leader was put in by some kind of CIA, FBI plot, according to also Mike Benz.
00:49:36.680 And the president was assassinated largely by our spooks, plus who they worked with in that country, who were probably not good people.
00:49:45.260 And then the bad people took over and then emptied the jails, released the prisoners.
00:49:51.240 And now the reports are that there are cannibal gangs that are going around eating people.
00:49:58.140 And the streets are just pure crime and violence now.
00:50:01.360 Now, a lot of people are saying, do you remember when Trump called these other countries shithole countries?
00:50:07.120 And people said, you can't say that.
00:50:09.440 Well, I'm not going to call them a shithole country because I've learned that that is an inappropriate thing to say.
00:50:16.880 So Haiti is not a shithole country.
00:50:19.940 It is merely a country with no functional economy or government in which the streets are ruled by criminal gangs and cannibalism is becoming a national problem.
00:50:33.340 But not a shithole.
00:50:36.680 Not.
00:50:37.440 Now, that's the bad news.
00:50:38.880 Here's the good news.
00:50:39.940 The good news is that the cannibals in Haiti have a better diet than most Americans.
00:50:45.600 And they're getting a good protein source.
00:50:49.100 Not a lot of additives.
00:50:50.760 And the reports are, oh, there are very few chronic illnesses in Haiti among the cannibals.
00:50:57.660 So the American diet, as you know, will give you a lot of chronic illnesses.
00:51:03.360 RFK Jr. will tell you that for sure.
00:51:05.540 But in Haiti, they've got a cleaner protein.
00:51:07.940 They're just eating each other.
00:51:09.540 And no chronic illness.
00:51:12.520 Yeah, it's a carnivore diet.
00:51:13.460 But, and then other people are saying, but hey, Scott, don't joke about this because those Haiti gangs are going to come to America.
00:51:23.280 The cannibals are going to come here and start eating Americans.
00:51:25.560 And I'm not sure that's a problem because if we just sort of lock ourselves indoors, the cannibals are going to end up eating people around doors.
00:51:38.180 So they're going to eat a lot of homeless people, probably eat a lot of the Venezuelan prisoners that were released.
00:51:47.340 So if we could get the cannibals to eat the Venezuelan prisoners that came up from Venezuela, that could be a plus.
00:51:55.580 So in the short run, two plans.
00:51:57.560 In the short run, you get the Haiti cannibals to eat the other migrants.
00:52:01.440 But eventually that's not going to work because if the cannibals stay here in America long enough, apparently the microplastics in the water will cause them to lose their health and vigor.
00:52:15.160 And they might lose all of their cannibalistic urges because they'll mostly be playing video games and masturbating like Americans.
00:52:23.600 And they just won't have the energy.
00:52:25.640 They'll probably just door dash like everybody else.
00:52:27.600 And they'll be like, well, I could go kill a homeless person and eat them because I'm a cannibal.
00:52:34.160 Or I could just door dash, play video games and masturbate.
00:52:37.360 So in the long run, I wouldn't worry about it.
00:52:39.940 It'll take care of itself.
00:52:43.420 Meanwhile, there's a study in of Great Britain that says that the water is so polluted that the men's sperm count is going down and they're shooting blanks.
00:52:52.060 This is coming from Sir Tim Smith, who is 69, they have to tell you.
00:53:01.480 So I don't know why that just seemed a story about a sperm.
00:53:07.740 And they got to tell us that the guy's age is 69.
00:53:10.680 I don't know.
00:53:11.720 Why do we need to know that?
00:53:15.300 Why do we need to know that?
00:53:16.700 Anyway, the UK's rivers and seas are so packed with chemicals that all the men are turning into hermaphrodites and frogs are gay and stuff.
00:53:26.480 Something like that.
00:53:29.360 But so, yeah, that's another example of the problems coming from inside the house.
00:53:33.560 Meanwhile, in the city of Pittsburgh, they're cutting back on the police responses.
00:53:37.120 So between 3 a.m. and 7 a.m., no police will show up if you report certain kinds of things like theft, harassment, criminal mischief, and burglary alarms.
00:53:49.420 Well, I'm not so sure you need the police in all those situations.
00:53:53.180 So that might actually make sense.
00:53:55.760 We'll see.
00:53:57.000 Let's talk about TikTok.
00:53:58.200 As you know, Trump was against it, but now he's for it because his biggest donor has like, I don't know, $30 billion invested in ByteDance.
00:54:08.880 So the biggest donor looks like he bought off at least Trump and Vivek and maybe Rand Paul and maybe Thomas Massey, maybe others.
00:54:18.160 And there are reports, one lawmaker told the publication Semaphore, they'd been personally threatened that a yes vote to ban TikTok could result in political retaliation.
00:54:31.140 They said it would be bad for your future and you'll get millions of dollars dropped in your head, meaning, you know, for your opponent.
00:54:40.660 So that's what's happening.
00:54:43.060 So if you thought that the risk of TikTok was coming from China, it was not.
00:54:50.600 It was coming from an American investor who has so much money that he can essentially buy the loyalty of Trump and Vivek and Rand Paul and Thomas Massey, apparently.
00:55:01.380 Now, I'll just say allegedly because you can't read anybody's minds, but that's what it looks like.
00:55:06.580 And if you wanted to make sure that's not the case, what you would do is you'd listen to Vivek and you'd make sure that he knew what the critical problem was, which is the persuasion threat.
00:55:20.120 So you can find that if he's bought off or he's lying by whether or not he says he understands the greatest threat.
00:55:29.320 So here's an update.
00:55:31.680 So if Vivek says, yes, I understand the threat of TikTok is a persuasion threat, then maybe he's got an honest opinion.
00:55:39.660 But if he ignores a persuasion threat and talks about things like data and children spending too much time on it, then you'd know he's bought off, in my opinion.
00:55:49.160 Can't read his mind, but that would be the indication.
00:55:52.000 So let's see what he says.
00:55:53.100 Listen for what reasons does he give why TikTok is bad?
00:55:56.880 Give me a reason.
00:56:23.460 Yeah, why?
00:56:26.880 Give us a reason.
00:56:28.000 Trump is a professional politician and neither am I.
00:56:30.540 But many people in professional politics, they look at what they're supposed to say and they act like billiard balls on a pool table.
00:56:36.300 They go in whatever direction they're hit without thinking about the actual.
00:56:39.000 Don't really need the analogy, just the reason.
00:56:41.840 Give us a reason.
00:56:42.560 Let's take a step back and ask about the why of what's going on here.
00:56:45.400 Could you get to it?
00:56:46.520 What is the concern that people have with TikTok?
00:56:48.080 Yeah, what is it?
00:56:49.260 Yeah, what is it?
00:56:49.820 What is it, Vivek?
00:56:51.280 What is it?
00:56:51.900 Not just TikTok, that applies to a bunch of other social media platforms.
00:56:54.520 Can you tell us?
00:56:55.260 And that is an issue we need to tackle.
00:56:56.840 Why don't you fucking get to it?
00:56:58.960 I do think there should be age-based restrictions on using addictive social media.
00:57:02.920 Okay, that's not the point.
00:57:04.140 But not a TikTok-specific point.
00:57:05.040 Yeah?
00:57:05.420 Get to the point.
00:57:06.320 This point about the investment relates to a different concern.
00:57:07.940 Oh, here it comes.
00:57:08.580 The use and provision of data, U.S. user data, potentially to the Chinese Communist Party.
00:57:14.220 And I think that is a major concern.
00:57:15.360 It's not the major concern.
00:57:16.980 It's a major concern.
00:57:17.860 It isn't limited to just TikTok or even Chinese-owned companies in the U.S.
00:57:22.440 Here it comes.
00:57:23.060 It expands to include even so-called U.S. companies that are still beholden to the CCP because they do business in China.
00:57:30.520 Here's an example.
00:57:31.820 A couple of years ago, there was good Wall Street Journal reporting.
00:57:34.220 This is all bullshit, by the way.
00:57:36.240 Not the issue.
00:57:37.100 A U.S. company, supposedly a U.S. company, at least, was providing U.S. user data to the CCP.
00:57:43.640 Not the issue.
00:57:45.640 Yeah, it's also bad, but it's not the big issue.
00:57:47.760 Journal reporting.
00:57:48.920 Sean Joyce, the chief privacy officer of Airbnb, resigned over that because it wasn't properly disclosed to the public.
00:57:55.140 And one of Airbnb's co-founders reported that...
00:57:56.780 Come on.
00:57:57.700 Let's talk about persuasion.
00:57:59.360 To promote American values.
00:58:01.260 And the big problem is...
00:58:02.600 I'm sure he wouldn't say that.
00:58:03.100 But what's the big problem, Fave?
00:58:04.480 They put a little black square on their Instagram account.
00:58:06.060 What's the big problem?
00:58:07.860 That virtue signaling aside, this is what they say behind closed doors.
00:58:10.720 All right.
00:58:11.000 It's not just Airbnb, though.
00:58:12.640 It applies to countless other U.S. companies.
00:58:15.060 Not the point.
00:58:15.840 We have to ask ourselves the why.
00:58:17.200 The why?
00:58:17.720 Why are you getting to the fucking point?
00:58:19.480 The concern we ought to have is the provision of U.S. consumer and user data to the Chinese Communist Party.
00:58:24.600 Not the point.
00:58:25.700 Get to the point.
00:58:27.260 Come on.
00:58:28.140 Ban U.S. companies.
00:58:29.180 Come on.
00:58:29.600 From providing U.S. user data.
00:58:31.580 Tell us persuasion is the big problem.
00:58:34.240 Say it.
00:58:34.580 Regardless of the company.
00:58:35.860 Say it.
00:58:36.460 But it is beyond silly to just pick one random company and go after them because that is temporarily politically popular.
00:58:42.960 Diversion.
00:58:43.860 Diversion.
00:58:44.380 I'm actually failing to solve the actual problem.
00:58:46.220 What's the actual problem?
00:58:47.160 Oh, now we're going to talk politics without actually talking about the problem.
00:59:00.160 So now it's about politics.
00:59:15.000 I became one of the rare Republicans when I was running for president.
00:59:17.520 One of the rare Republican candidates who did open a TikTok account.
00:59:23.740 Any questions?
00:59:26.760 Yeah, it's exactly what it looks like.
00:59:28.560 So, yeah, apparently they were just bought off.
00:59:31.640 Now, what Trump says is that he said he thinks TikTok is a national security threat, but he couldn't support Congress banning it because it would boost support for Facebook, which he says is the enemy of the people.
00:59:45.760 Now, first of all, would it boost, say, Instagram that it's owned by Facebook?
00:59:54.940 Do you think it would boost Instagram?
00:59:56.900 Because Instagram is a competing service.
00:59:59.560 You know, they have reels that are like TikToks.
01:00:02.580 I think so.
01:00:03.940 Probably.
01:00:06.980 But would that make any difference?
01:00:09.420 I don't think it would make enough difference.
01:00:11.200 Is the reason that Facebook is the enemy of the people, do they have only barely enough money to be the enemy of the people?
01:00:22.220 Vivek's not wrong.
01:00:23.760 He's just he's diverting.
01:00:27.760 Did you hear me say he was wrong?
01:00:30.660 No, I didn't say he's wrong.
01:00:32.260 I said that they were bought off.
01:00:34.780 But and that they're markedly.
01:00:36.720 So the people who are not bought off are Crawford.
01:00:44.680 And.
01:00:48.860 Well, I'll give you some other names, but the people who mentioned persuasion specifically.
01:00:54.880 They're not bought off because they know the big problem.
01:00:58.500 If they say persuasion first as the big problem, then you could say they're not bought off.
01:01:04.440 So Facebook has all the money it needs to be the enemy of the people.
01:01:11.300 It wouldn't make any difference if they had a little extra money from some TikTok people coming over.
01:01:16.760 That is obviously not a real reason.
01:01:19.120 Trump is giving you the best reason he can.
01:01:21.820 It's a lie.
01:01:22.920 It's because they're there.
01:01:25.020 It's because they're a big donor.
01:01:27.180 Oh, it's a big piece of it.
01:01:28.320 So the problem on TikTok is coming from inside the house.
01:01:31.460 Your government apparently will not be there to help you whatsoever on the question of TikTok.
01:01:37.720 So it's up to the parents.
01:01:42.200 Let me check in.
01:01:48.980 You think that Crenshaw said persuasion is the big problem, but they he's bought off.
01:01:55.000 Who's going to pay for that?
01:01:57.740 Who would buy who would buy him off?
01:01:59.360 You have to figure out who would pay for that.
01:02:05.440 Nobody would pay for that.
01:02:08.300 All right.
01:02:09.420 Adam Schiff, who still hasn't passed the uncanny valley problem where you don't look like a human.
01:02:18.340 You look you look at him and you go, I don't even know if I'm looking at a human there.
01:02:22.600 Is that a human being?
01:02:23.700 Anyway, Schiff and John Brennan are saying the same message.
01:02:30.880 What's that tell you?
01:02:32.660 If Adam Schiff and John Brennan both go on TV and say the same thing about Trump, what do you know about the thing they said?
01:02:40.740 They are literally the hoax team.
01:02:44.680 The hoax team is Clapper, Brennan, Schiff, Swalwell, Raskin, right?
01:02:50.440 Others.
01:02:51.360 But if you see them working together on any Trump related thing, it's a hoax.
01:02:57.080 It's what they do.
01:02:58.280 They don't send these guys out for the true stuff because the true stuff, you don't need hoaxers.
01:03:03.540 They save the hoaxers for just hoaxers.
01:03:07.880 So as soon as you see that Brennan and Schiff said the same thing, which is that the intel people probably won't give President Trump as a candidate or maybe even in office the good stuff on the intelligence briefings,
01:03:23.840 because they don't trust him with all of his boxes at Mar-a-Lago, they don't explain why it was okay that Biden had a bunch of boxes.
01:03:34.480 But they say that they'll probably leave out, quote, the sources and methods, because they're afraid that Trump would give the sources and methods away to somebody.
01:03:48.040 Now, here's my question.
01:03:49.080 Why would you ever tell a president the sources and methods, whether it's Trump or somebody else?
01:03:56.020 Isn't that exactly what you shouldn't tell somebody who's not deep into the secret part of the government?
01:04:03.180 I think the secret part of the government should say, here's what we know.
01:04:09.240 And then when they say, how do you know it?
01:04:11.480 Yeah, you can say something general.
01:04:13.380 But should you be giving sources and methods?
01:04:17.940 Should you?
01:04:19.640 It seems like you should never be written down.
01:04:22.700 But if the president asks for it, don't you think they should answer?
01:04:27.720 As in, how do we know this is true?
01:04:30.560 And they could say something like, well, we have human intelligence sources that we trust and they've been right before.
01:04:37.080 Is that something that's going to give away the store?
01:04:40.360 Most of these are kind of obvious how we get, you know, it's either human or intelligence or something.
01:04:48.100 But anyway, so I have a question whether any president ever got something that secret, the sources and methods, except for the generic stuff.
01:04:55.320 So I don't even think the issue is real.
01:04:59.000 But when you see Brennan and Schiff on it, it means that they're part of a hoax to make it seem that Trump is uniquely untrustworthy with information.
01:05:09.680 It's just part of a narrative.
01:05:12.020 There's a video that I saw in the Maze account, M-A-Z on X, shows President Obama in 2009 talking about immigration and saying,
01:05:24.560 we can't have a million people pouring over the border, half a million pouring over the border, which is what we have per year or more.
01:05:32.280 And seven years later, Obama's position is considered racist and xenophobic by Democrats.
01:05:40.260 Now, do you see that none of our national opinions are real?
01:05:47.720 Can you see that opinions are just assigned?
01:05:49.840 And I always tell you that, and I think you say to yourself, well, not to me.
01:05:55.040 I mean, some other people might get their opinions assigned to them, but that doesn't apply to a thinking person like myself.
01:06:03.360 But no, the Democrats were told in 2009 that you can't have a half a million people pouring over the border.
01:06:10.880 That'd be bad.
01:06:12.300 And Obama said it and the news said it.
01:06:14.400 So Democrats said it too.
01:06:15.840 And then when everything changed for no good reason, and suddenly those people are pouring over the border,
01:06:23.640 suddenly it would be racist and xenophobic to point out that that was ever a bad idea.
01:06:29.460 And that was immediately adopted by Democrats.
01:06:32.440 Is there any question in your mind that our opinions on politics are just assigned to us?
01:06:40.900 There's nobody who thought this through.
01:06:43.160 Do you think there are a bunch of Democrats who got new information since 2009?
01:06:48.600 It's like, you know, in 2009, with the information we were working with,
01:06:52.220 we did think it was bad for half a million people to come across the border.
01:06:55.240 But now that we're seeing it happen, all the information suggests it's a great idea.
01:07:00.820 Do you think that happened?
01:07:01.860 No.
01:07:02.800 No.
01:07:03.280 The news told them what to think, and then they thought it.
01:07:06.420 That's all that happened.
01:07:10.420 Well, let's talk about Israel going into Rafa.
01:07:13.240 As you know, Biden said that was going to be a red line.
01:07:18.760 Now, a red line, let me define what a red line means.
01:07:21.680 A red line is something you say, but then you ignore because it doesn't really mean anything
01:07:26.720 in the real world, apparently, unless you're Putin.
01:07:30.560 Putin actually acts on red lines.
01:07:34.280 That's why you have Ukraine.
01:07:35.960 But again, I guess we just use it as a word.
01:07:39.960 It doesn't mean anything.
01:07:41.560 So Biden said it would be a red line if Israel goes into Rafa while there are still civilians there,
01:07:48.220 of which there are.
01:07:48.980 And Netanyahu said, we're going to do whatever we need to do.
01:07:54.780 We're going into Rafa.
01:07:56.940 So are you surprised?
01:08:01.580 To me, this looks like good cop, bad cop business.
01:08:04.780 It doesn't look real.
01:08:07.080 Do you think that Biden really wants Israel not to go into Rafa?
01:08:12.100 Do you think that's his actual opinion?
01:08:15.120 It could be.
01:08:16.820 Might actually be.
01:08:17.620 But I feel like this is just obvious good cop, bad cop business.
01:08:23.200 Because the United States wants to act like, you know, we're the reasonable brokers and, you know,
01:08:29.340 we're the control on Israel that they don't go too far.
01:08:33.200 You know, but we're a little bit on both sides.
01:08:35.860 You know, we're going to give aid to both sides.
01:08:38.600 And given that we know Netanyahu was absolutely, definitely going to do what he was going to do,
01:08:45.160 no matter what we said, it kind of made sense for Biden to oppose it.
01:08:50.380 So I might surprise you here, too.
01:08:53.500 Biden doing that fake red line and saying, don't go into Rafa is actually probably good politics.
01:09:01.040 It's probably good politics.
01:09:02.420 I just don't think he means it because he knows it doesn't make any difference and Netanyahu is going to do whatever he wants.
01:09:09.280 But probably good.
01:09:11.120 But speaking of which, I should also mention that if Vake and Trump are just being political, it's probably good politics.
01:09:19.440 So the question about TikTok and banning it, if it's true, and I don't know that this is true, but it could be, and I think it's likely it's true.
01:09:32.240 If it's true that TikTok was never going to be banned because it just would never get the votes, then there's no point in Vake and Trump being on a losing side.
01:09:42.640 If they know it's going to lose, you might as well be on the side that says, hey, I'm no dictator.
01:09:49.400 I'm not going to ban this free speech.
01:09:52.960 So it looks like Trump and Vake have found the political sweet spot, which is you act like you're in favor of free speech,
01:10:00.560 but you have to lie through your teeth about what you understand about the risk of TikTok.
01:10:06.420 So they're obviously lying through the teeth.
01:10:08.320 Laura Trump, as you know, is the co-chair of the RNC now, and people are saying there's some good indications there.
01:10:20.820 So she's going strong to suggest Republicans work hard for ballot harvesting, the legal kind, the legal kind, not any illegal stuff.
01:10:30.140 But everybody understood that if you don't ballot harvest like crazy, you can't win in today's environment.
01:10:35.180 So at least she's fighting fire with fire.
01:10:38.260 And, you know, I heard some of you being skeptical about her as the person in this job.
01:10:46.240 I actually have a really high opinion of her.
01:10:49.740 You know, just from a little bit of interaction.
01:10:52.080 She's interviewed me a few times.
01:10:53.940 And every time I see her, she just looks like such a put together, serious, capable person, you know, just in general.
01:11:03.720 And I guess she's going to utilize Scott Pressler as well, who everybody who likes him knows that that's a good idea.
01:11:12.460 So Pressler is apparently a superstar for registering Republicans to vote.
01:11:16.900 And why wouldn't you use your superstar?
01:11:20.040 It's been puzzling that he wasn't, didn't have a higher profile because he obviously knows how to do this work.
01:11:25.540 So two indications that Lara is not only right for the job, but already on it and doing some positive things.
01:11:34.820 There was a report that said Trump, when he met with Musk, wanted him to speak at the Republican National Convention.
01:11:42.260 CNBC is saying that.
01:11:45.500 That didn't happen.
01:11:46.720 Now, actually, let me revise that.
01:11:51.820 It might have happened because, you know, it doesn't hurt to ask.
01:11:55.460 But Musk is never going to speak at the Republican National Convention.
01:12:00.440 Who takes that seriously?
01:12:03.460 Really?
01:12:04.760 Do any of you think that he would be dumb enough to speak for one of the two major political parties when he's trying to sell cars to everybody?
01:12:12.700 Of course not.
01:12:15.940 Of course not.
01:12:19.100 That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
01:12:22.020 He's like one of the smartest guys in the world.
01:12:24.900 And CNBC is, you know, reporting it like, you know, maybe he'd be mulling over doing the dumbest thing in the world.
01:12:31.260 The dumbest thing in the world would be to give a speech at one of the party's conventions.
01:12:36.460 Nothing would be dumber than that.
01:12:37.960 And he'd be doing extra work to be doing the dumbest thing.
01:12:43.080 No, that's not going to happen.
01:12:49.200 Scott Pressler is actually on the road getting signed up.
01:12:51.940 Yeah.
01:12:53.420 I don't know how he gets funded, but he's doing work.
01:12:59.920 Yeah.
01:13:00.400 And Musk has to depend on the government liking him for a lot of his businesses.
01:13:04.940 That's true.
01:13:06.060 All right.
01:13:06.420 Is there any story I missed?
01:13:08.820 And did I make my case that the problem is coming from inside the house?
01:13:14.600 TikTok problem?
01:13:15.880 Inside the house.
01:13:17.340 Border problem?
01:13:19.200 Coming from inside the house.
01:13:23.480 Yep.
01:13:25.300 Oh.
01:13:28.400 It's funny.
01:13:29.040 I can tell people who don't know anything about me by whether they believe the 4chan hoax about my pandemic beliefs.
01:13:40.220 I live in this weird world where anybody who follows me knows I had the best predictions about the pandemic by far.
01:13:48.460 And nobody was even close.
01:13:49.560 I just nailed that fucking thing.
01:13:50.820 I just nailed that fucking thing.
01:13:52.840 But 4chan reversed it and made it look like I get everything wrong.
01:13:57.200 So some percentage of the planet thinks I'm the worst ever when it was probably the best prediction performance of all time.
01:14:09.340 By the way, I do take some credit.
01:14:13.940 And I also tell you when I get things wrong because I think that's fair.
01:14:17.660 Otherwise, you know, since what I do here is make predictions.
01:14:23.680 I should tell you when I get them wrong and I should tell you when I get them right.
01:14:28.700 Peter Navarro got four months in prison.
01:14:32.000 Oh, my God.
01:14:36.880 Pittsburgh.
01:14:37.520 Yeah, we talked about that.
01:14:38.500 There are some people who never saw 4chan, but the hoax started there.
01:14:48.060 So if you heard somebody who believed it, then you got it from somebody who got it from 4chan.
01:15:00.060 Scott, millions of people have built businesses on TikTok.
01:15:03.200 They'll have their lives ruined if it's banned.
01:15:06.220 It's true.
01:15:06.860 Yeah, there's nothing that's free.
01:15:13.260 I'm looking at the people who fell for it.
01:15:15.660 They're trying to redeem themselves.
01:15:19.500 Here's one.
01:15:21.120 Klot failed on COVID and now pretends he didn't.
01:15:24.880 You should be very embarrassed that you fell for a 4chan hoax.
01:15:30.340 Are you aware that I predicted that the vaccinations would not work when it was announced?
01:15:36.860 Never changed my mind.
01:15:39.540 Were you aware of that?
01:15:41.640 Did you know I was against mandates all the time?
01:15:44.480 And I was never in favor of masks.
01:15:47.340 It was part of the activism to get them removed.
01:15:53.020 Anyway, you should be embarrassed that you fell for a 4chan hoax.
01:15:58.620 If you watched my videos, then you're dumber than you act like, because look at the comments.
01:16:12.140 Look at the comments.
01:16:13.340 The other people who watch the videos, too, will tell you you got everything wrong.
01:16:16.640 All right.
01:16:22.960 Some of you want to hate Dan Crenshaw.
01:16:26.160 Well, I don't know what other issues you have with him, but he's right on TikTok.
01:16:35.320 On TikTok, he's exactly right.
01:16:41.020 Other things?
01:16:41.960 I don't know.
01:16:45.620 Didn't I get the vax?
01:16:47.480 What's that got to do with anything?
01:16:48.600 So some of you think I got the pandemic wrong because I got the vax.
01:16:55.300 Let me say this clearly for those of you who don't understand.
01:16:58.980 What fucking business is what I did for my own health?
01:17:03.680 What's that got to do with anybody?
01:17:06.080 And how do you know I didn't make the right decision?
01:17:07.920 Because if you believe anything about data about the pandemic, you're an idiot.
01:17:17.000 Anything that agrees with you or anything that doesn't agree with you, there's no data about
01:17:20.740 the pandemic that's reliable.
01:17:22.620 So there's a school of thought that says that people my age with a comorbidity may have gotten
01:17:29.480 some protection.
01:17:32.160 And I don't know if I did, but might have.
01:17:34.340 And I got, as far as I know, no negative effects.
01:17:41.060 I'm healthier than I've ever been, as far as I can tell.
01:17:45.300 And I got to go on great worldwide vacations, which part was a mistake?
01:17:50.600 Now, you might say, but later there might be a problem.
01:17:53.720 And then you'd be right.
01:17:56.100 But it wouldn't mean I made a mistake.
01:17:58.460 Because let me explain what a lot of you don't understand.
01:18:02.180 I'll put it in easy terms.
01:18:03.220 Let's say there's two paths, and one of them has a 90% chance of working, and one of them
01:18:10.880 has a 10% chance of working, right?
01:18:14.000 There's two paths.
01:18:15.300 Let's say, and we don't know, we're just guessing.
01:18:18.480 And I've got my reasons, you've got your reasons.
01:18:20.580 But I take the path where there's a 90% chance of being right, but I get unlucky.
01:18:26.800 So the 10% kicks in.
01:18:28.300 So there was a 90% chance I'd be right, but I wasn't.
01:18:33.380 Somebody else took the path with a 10% chance of being right.
01:18:38.220 And they got lucky.
01:18:39.180 What would the person who was a 10% chance of right say after they got lucky?
01:18:46.200 They would say they were geniuses.
01:18:48.380 And they would say that I made the wrong choice.
01:18:51.340 But I didn't make the wrong choice.
01:18:53.080 I got the wrong outcome.
01:18:54.260 So if your analytical abilities can't separate the wrong outcome from making the right choice
01:19:03.920 based on statistics, then you shouldn't be talking about it.
01:19:09.620 That's pretty basic stuff.
01:19:13.200 Now, some of you also say that you knew it would be bad for you because it was the government
01:19:20.080 and big pharma.
01:19:21.380 Nobody trusted that.
01:19:24.740 Not me, not anybody.
01:19:26.300 Nobody trusted it.
01:19:27.620 So I waited nine months to see who dropped dead.
01:19:31.000 Because if I believed it, I would have gone first.
01:19:35.300 I waited like nine months.
01:19:37.700 People weren't dropping dead in my age group.
01:19:40.460 If I had been young, do you think I would have gotten it?
01:19:44.340 Probably not.
01:19:45.300 If I didn't have a comorbidity, asthma, and it wasn't a lung disease,
01:19:49.900 do you think I would have gotten it?
01:19:51.960 Probably not.
01:19:53.300 No, no, but probably not.
01:19:54.940 So a lot of you are generalizing from your personal experience
01:19:58.380 to what I should have done with my personal health, and that's actually stupid.
01:20:03.520 You can only say that you got a result you liked or that you guessed right.
01:20:07.240 But your opinion of what I did for my personal medical situation is, first of all, you can't
01:20:13.740 know if it worked or not.
01:20:15.200 There's no reliable data.
01:20:17.280 I don't have any outcomes that are bad so far that I'm aware of.
01:20:21.480 And I had a great year, and you had to stay home.
01:20:26.660 So how did I lose?
01:20:29.700 Where's the part where I'm worse off?
01:20:32.360 Because I don't see it in that story.
01:20:34.240 I see I had more freedom than you, and in the long run so far, it cost me nothing.
01:20:40.760 Am I wrong?
01:20:42.440 I had more freedom because I was not afraid of the shot after nine months of watching
01:20:48.500 people my age not die from it.
01:20:51.480 All right.
01:20:53.360 That's enough of that.
01:20:54.920 We're done with the pandemic.
01:20:56.820 I'd appreciate it if you never bring up the pandemic again.
01:21:02.840 Yeah.
01:21:04.260 It's just too boring.
01:21:06.360 Like, it forces me to talk about it and then, you know, to just correct your misperceptions.
01:21:12.000 I'm just bored with it.
01:21:14.240 All right.
01:21:14.660 So this guy says, Scott coming out is pro-vax.
01:21:22.640 Now, did you hear that, asshole?
01:21:24.840 Did you hear me say pro-vax?
01:21:26.820 Did you hear me say that I said it wouldn't work, and as far as I know, it didn't work
01:21:30.820 for most people?
01:21:35.480 Now, which part is pro-vax?
01:21:37.020 Are you still unable to hear what I'm saying?
01:21:40.300 You can't handle that level of complexity, Lenzar?
01:21:44.740 Or are you just a troll?
01:21:46.360 I can't tell if you're a fucking idiot or bad hearing comprehension.
01:21:52.380 It's hard to tell.
01:21:53.800 All right.
01:21:54.100 We'll just assume you're stupid.
01:21:58.060 All right.
01:21:58.740 That's all for now.
01:22:00.200 And grifter.
01:22:10.360 They lied.
01:22:11.720 Yeah.
01:22:12.160 You're all off the point.
01:22:13.580 All right.
01:22:14.460 That's all for now.
01:22:15.420 I'll see you tomorrow.
01:22:16.300 Maybe I'll have better internet.
01:22:18.000 I doubt it.
01:22:19.460 And thanks for joining.