Episode 2412 CWSA 03⧸13⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 25 minutes
Words per minute
158.5473
Harmful content
Misogyny
15
sentences flagged
Hate speech
32
sentences flagged
Summary
The Tate brothers are facing life in prison in the UK, the gender pay gap is fake, and there's still a debate about whether or not there's a difference of opinion between apples and oranges. And why does this happen?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
well good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called
00:00:09.660
coffee with scott adams because that's what it is if you'd like to take your experience
00:00:13.900
and it's an experience let me tell you up to a level that nobody can even imagine with their
00:00:19.260
tiny human brains all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker chalice a stein a canteen
00:00:23.120
jug or flask a vessel of any kind filling with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me
00:00:29.640
now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything
00:00:34.160
better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now
00:00:37.900
ah i feel connected to all of you with a invisible connection i thought i was going to come up with
00:00:52.040
a better word than connection and then once i got there really wasn't a better one so we'll just go
00:00:59.280
with that well let's just jump into stories we'll do the big ones and the small ones and i'll do at
00:01:07.220
least one thing that could get me canceled maybe more and more canceled than i already am
00:01:13.760
well the tate brothers are looking at some say life in prison in the uk and you're probably saying to
00:01:21.400
yourself my god what are the charges that are so so bad they could go to prison for life and the answer
00:01:28.760
is um i don't know i looked i clicked a bunch of things i read a bunch of things but i have no idea
00:01:38.000
is it some kind of uh sexual charge or something does anybody know i've not seen any news of what the
00:01:46.980
charges are now i think andrew tate said he's he's worried it could turn into an assange situation
00:01:54.820
that situation being somebody who's really a political prisoner but the system is treating
00:02:01.740
them like they're a normal prisoner or a normal criminal and could get them killed or
00:02:07.840
kept in jail forever somebody says it's a rape charge both of them both brothers coincidentally
00:02:16.940
well how many of you think that's real does anybody think that the that the reason for the charges
00:02:29.940
uh i don't know i doubt i doubt it i mean we live in a world where you just can't take anything on face
00:02:39.400
value can you now i want to be clear i'm no supporter of the tate brothers we we've uh or at least
00:02:46.480
andrew tate i've had my differences with him so i don't support him personally but uh when i see a
00:02:54.760
situation like this it does not scream criminal it screams political and i don't think i can ignore
00:03:02.600
the fact that people who have opinions a lot like his all seem to be targeted okay can you think of
00:03:10.320
anybody who has an opinion anywhere in the general area of the tate brothers who has not been targeted
00:03:16.080
by the government or it looks like the government or intelligence services something like that i can't
00:03:23.680
think of one can you it seems like every single person who has a certain set of opinions is targeted
00:03:30.320
by the legal system for all the crimes now i don't know if the tate brothers did any crimes like
00:03:36.880
i said it's not my job to defend their character or their history or anything else i'm just saying we
00:03:42.560
live in a world where my first assumption is it's probably fake isn't that terrible my first assumption
00:03:51.040
which i still keep that's my current assumption is it's probably fake i hate that i even live in a
00:03:58.000
world in which i have to say that but it's probably fake all right uh can you believe that yet again
00:04:05.360
there was another story about the gender pay gap and quoting the 82 cents on a dollar thing uh would
1.00
00:04:13.120
you like me to tell you why that story still persists the 82 cents on a dollar now everybody who is a
0.96
00:04:22.000
little bit educated uh is aware that that's just comparing apples to oranges and if you compared
00:04:28.640
people with the same experience you know that disappears but why why do people keep saying it
00:04:35.840
why does it just keep coming up over and over for decades when it's been disproven by every study and
00:04:42.640
every single person who knows anything about it it's literally comparing an apple to an orange
00:04:48.000
so oh more more men are in let's say stem jobs more women might be in let's say jobs that are more
00:04:57.680
nurturing or taking care of people so she you know sociologists and stuff and they make different money
00:05:05.680
but i thought every education every educated person knows that but it turns out there's a lot who don't
00:05:12.640
and do you know why this story persists even though so obviously take it out of context
00:05:20.720
not true it persists because nobody can tell batshit crazy women the truth it's just too dangerous
1.00
00:05:27.840
that the reason that this even exists is because there's so many people who don't know how to do any
00:05:32.960
kind of analytical job can't do the research can't do the math this is a stupidity issue not a difference of
00:05:40.160
opinion there's no difference of opinion everybody smart male and female knows this is fake news
00:05:48.080
everyone and the reason that there are people who are not let's say experts and don't follow the news
00:05:55.040
as much the reason they believe it that this persists is because men are too afraid to tell women the truth
00:06:02.160
it's like this is not yeah you're comparing a rock to a you know a bird yeah the only reason that
00:06:10.000
number exists is because you don't know how to analyze things which is basically like a math problem
00:06:17.360
all right so that's the truth truth is it's totally fake and here's one of my standards for detecting bs
00:06:24.400
it's not a hundred percent doesn't work every single time but it's really really good it goes like this
00:06:33.680
if the science or the data tells you one thing and your entire lived experience tells you the other
00:06:41.200
it's probably not true it's probably not true and i always use the lung cancer example of smoking
00:06:48.560
science says that smoking gives you lung cancer and sure enough i know people who smoke cigarettes and
00:06:54.000
die of lung cancer so that's not proof you know my personal experience but at least it's consistent
00:07:00.720
what i see matches what the scientists say pretty good um but in my entire life i've never heard of one
00:07:10.320
one example not even one in which a woman was paid less than a man when they had the same experience
00:07:18.800
they had the same you know uh let's say qualifications did the same amount of work
00:07:25.680
and negotiated just as aggressively i've never seen it have any of you ever seen it have you ever seen a
00:07:34.000
say verify the situation where where it really was the same same years of experience same qualifications
00:07:43.360
just 20 different bay i've never seen it all right here's a little mental experiment for you
00:07:50.720
this will this will blow your mind take a hundred men chosen at random but they all have the same
00:07:58.320
occupation a hundred men just randomly chosen there are no women in the group just a hundred men and
00:08:05.040
let's say they're all uh i don't know they're all uh data analysts or something all have the same job
00:08:13.920
did they all have the same pay do all the data analysts have the same pay a hundred chosen randomly
00:08:20.960
no of course not their pay is going to be all over the place
00:08:23.360
so should you say that the people in the bottom half of the pay because it would be lots of different
00:08:30.880
pay levels would i say that they've been discriminated against for being men no you
00:08:37.920
would just say that any hundred people even in the same job would have you know different incomes do
00:08:43.680
you think somebody studied and found the the ones that got a little extra and they're trying to correct
00:08:48.880
it no we don't do that do you think anybody looked at the men who are paid less than other men
00:08:55.600
for the same job and said we got to correct this no nobody gives a shit because it's about men but
00:09:02.400
suppose you took a hundred men and a hundred women randomly and some of the um and they were all in the
00:09:09.520
same job now if you randomly studied a hundred men and a hundred women would you find a whole bunch of
0.93
00:09:16.000
situations in which there were in fact women who seemed to be suspiciously paid less than the men
0.96
00:09:23.920
yes you would because there would be people paid all kinds of things for all kinds of reasons and
00:09:28.640
all kinds of different places but you could also find in that same group men who are paid less than other
00:09:34.960
men and also men who are paid less than other women so the entire the entire topic is people who don't
00:09:42.400
know how to do analysis so to pretend there's some kind of difference of opinion or or that it matches
00:09:48.000
your experience is just absurd now let me ask you in the comments again just so you can see each other
00:09:53.440
has anybody ever even seen one example i'm going to say in the last
00:10:00.480
10 years we'll limit it to the last 10 years in the last 10 years has anybody ever seen one example
00:10:07.040
where you were really sure that people had the same qualifications but different pay
00:10:12.400
and if you had are you aware that you could find that same difference if you were only looking at men
00:10:19.360
you would find men with different pay for the same jobs how do you explain that
00:10:24.560
no it's all just bad analysis there's nothing else to it
00:10:30.320
all right uh trump said something that got him in a little bit of political
00:10:35.040
hot water he said uh in an interview asking about entitlements because as you know our budget's out of
00:10:40.240
control and he said uh there's a there's a lot that can be done in entitlements in terms of cutting
00:10:46.320
so then biden got on that and said uh trump's gonna cut your entitlements now what trump said was
00:10:55.520
there's a lot that can be done in terms of cutting but i feel like there's a whole level of creativity
00:11:02.160
that could be applied that hasn't been for example i'll just take myself if you gave me the option
00:11:09.040
decision of taking half of what i would probably get in social security but take it now i'd probably
00:11:17.680
do it and i'd say i'd save the country a bunch of money on social security and then they could use
00:11:22.720
that for other people because my situation isn't like other people and maybe maybe i say to myself you
00:11:29.200
know what i don't know if social security will go away someday i'll just take half now and you know
00:11:35.120
because it's not going to be the deciding point of whether i have a good life so i'll save you some
00:11:39.920
money the country by taking half would you say yes to that who loses who's the loser in that deal
00:11:49.280
if i willingly say you know i'll be fine with half and you get to keep some of your money your tax money
00:11:55.040
that would have gone to me are you happy so i wonder if there are other things like that for example
00:12:03.040
could you say to some young people you know young people we've been doing this ordinary
00:12:09.920
social security thing but if you'd like it's purely optional you can have your social security put into
00:12:17.840
let's say the um the stock market into an etf a nice diversified american etf so that you'd be well
00:12:26.640
diversified and you would do as well as the country and if you opted into it and you don't have to
00:12:33.360
you might make way more money because you got stock but we would only give you maybe less
00:12:40.240
we would give you less but you could have it in stock would anybody go for that probably would it
00:12:47.600
work out for the people who said yes i'll take stock yeah if they're 25 when they say it probably
00:12:54.320
because stock is tends to be a better idea than most things in the long long long run so i like
00:13:01.520
uh i like trump being honest enough to say there's a lot that can be done meaning that
00:13:07.280
you can't just let it run forever something has to be done we all know that but i'd like to see him get
00:13:12.800
get uh i'd like to see him get creative uh i think it's time for that like really really think about
00:13:20.800
all the ways the free market and maybe some kind of a gambling network and some kind of an alternative
00:13:27.920
situation i'll bet there is a lot that can be done anyway um what i'd like to see is some new
00:13:36.800
legislation to give all of our security money social security money to undocumented migrants
00:13:44.800
so it'd be a bill that says we'll just stop paying social security to all citizens
00:13:49.280
and we'll just give all that money to undocumented uh immigrants now the reason i want that is not
0.89
00:13:56.000
because i want it to pass that'd be crazy that'd be crazy people i don't want to give all my social
00:14:02.560
security money away to undocumented migrants there'd just be more of them but what i do want to see is
1.00
00:14:08.080
that legislation floated to see who votes for it i just want to see who votes for it just to find out
00:14:14.960
like how many people are not even trying because it doesn't seem like we've got to a situation where
00:14:21.680
it's not so much a difference of opinion does it feel to you like there's a philosophical difference
00:14:28.880
of opinion between the democrats and the republicans not always sometimes yes not always what it looks to
00:14:37.840
me is that some people are not even trying or they're trying to destroy the country or they're
00:14:42.720
batshit crazy so let's just let's just create um much the way you've heard the stories about the
00:14:49.920
people who ran pranks on the scientific reviews so i think it's been done more than once where people
00:14:57.680
would write totally fake scientific papers just ridiculous stuff to see if they can get it peer
00:15:03.520
reviewed and accepted and published and sure enough they can get a peer reviewed and accepted and published
00:15:09.920
and then it tells the public oh this is what's going on very useful because once you learn that
00:15:17.040
half of the scientific studies are just fake you know it gives you some perspective so i'd like
00:15:22.960
to do the same thing come up with some fake legislation to give all of our social security
0.92
00:15:27.920
money every single penny of it to undocumented migrants and then just watch who says yes
0.88
00:15:32.560
yes you don't think uh you don't think half of the squad is going to say yes
00:15:39.600
because it's whatever is worse for the country they seem fairly consistent about doing why i don't know
00:15:48.160
well over in england the national health service there has decided to uh ban puberty
00:15:54.480
puberty blockers for kids so kids who want to transition they're not going to be able to get their puberty
00:16:00.160
blockers and the reason is that they just think it's too dangerous health wise isn't working out
00:16:06.000
risk reward wise and um i'm kind of bored with the whole trans thing every time i have to talk about
00:16:13.120
it i figure like i feel like i'm being manipulated because there's nothing i care less about than the
00:16:19.600
trans issues i love the trans community yeah but big fan of the lgbtq community love them all would love
00:16:27.120
to them to live the best life that they can put together for themselves and it's not up to me to
00:16:33.040
tell anybody how to live for the adults but what's interesting to me about this is that it seems to me
00:16:40.480
that every american kid from from this day forward has a lawsuit and i'm no lawyer but let me just trot
00:16:49.840
this out see see if any of the real lawyers agree with this it would be one thing if your doctor gave
00:16:56.960
you a treatment and he honestly or she honestly believed it was good for you that's fine and then
00:17:03.120
if things go wrong well that's just the real world i wish i hadn't but things went wrong but what happens
00:17:09.600
when probably every doctor who's in this space in america is now aware that england looked at it and
00:17:17.920
found it too dangerous now now give it to a kid you don't think you have a little extra legal liability
00:17:25.520
now i i thought the standard was i thought the standard was that once it becomes common knowledge
00:17:32.960
that something's too dangerous that would be the point where you're being irresponsible
00:17:38.160
am i wrong or or can a doctor in this country say yeah i'm completely aware that in england
00:17:44.960
they did the analysis and found it too dangerous but it's still legal here so here's your bills
00:17:52.560
i feel like i feel like there's a tipping point situation in which it wouldn't take many entities
00:18:00.080
to say this is dangerous we're making it illegal before everybody would have to make it illegal
00:18:05.680
because remember the the law and medicine in general are very risk averse
00:18:11.840
they don't want to do something where you can obviously get sued you know if it's just begging
00:18:16.320
to get sued they don't want to do it so if if everybody was just guessing about what was the
00:18:23.040
right thing to do then i don't know that you could sue a doctor for giving somebody puberty blockers when
00:18:28.720
they're young if they legitimately didn't know that that was a risky situation but now that they know
00:18:36.720
i don't know i've got a feeling that insurance and the courts will take care of this pretty quickly
00:18:42.160
now that's my prediction that the uh transitioning of kids probably is going to collapse as a as a
0.81
00:18:49.680
thing that society ever did i think someday it'll seem like the it will seem as bad as
00:18:56.000
um german experimentation on prisoners i think it'll seem that bad someday in the future
00:19:05.840
um by today's perspective i do think most of the people involved were just trying to help
00:19:11.120
which i hate i hate that most of the people had good intentions
00:19:16.000
i mean it's better than bad intentions but i hate that well there are a lot of a lot of people
00:19:22.160
who are going to learn that they've basically been butchers and murderers and they thought they
00:19:26.720
were doing something good so and every day i see another story about the number of people taking
00:19:34.800
their own lives in the trans community especially after transition seems just insanely high but you
0.99
00:19:41.600
have to be careful about that data i would be really careful about any kind of self-harm data about
00:19:47.120
the trans community because i think it's hard to untangle cause and effect in that case all right
0.99
00:19:55.840
rfk jr has teased that uh two choices for his vice presidential running mate might be nfl quarterback
0.78
00:20:04.240
aaron rogers uh or minnesota ex-minnesota governor jesse ventura now does that sound like he's serious
00:20:13.920
about being president because remember rfk jr did say that running for president was the way he could
00:20:21.120
have free speech so there's there's part of me that thinks that rfk jr is not expecting to win or playing
00:20:28.880
to win but rather he's playing to finally after you know decades of trying to be heard about the food
00:20:35.760
supply and the pharmaceutical companies that he's just doing it to make his point and i believe that
00:20:41.360
the reason he would identify these two individuals who you don't think would be at the top of the
00:20:45.840
list at the moment you know although obviously jesse ventura's had a serious government job at one
00:20:51.360
point but i think they're both anti uh i don't want to say anti-vax i'll say uh they're not pro-vax would
00:20:58.320
that be true which is different from being anti so i think that i think he's just being consistent with his
00:21:06.320
primary concern which is the health of the american public i think i think rfk jr's consistent focus on
00:21:14.960
the health of americans honestly is one of the best things i've ever seen in america it's one of the
00:21:23.600
best things i've ever seen in american history you know it's funny we're surrounded with such just
00:21:31.600
horrible horrible actors in politics and sometimes your fellow citizens but i don't see anything
00:21:39.920
wrong with what kennedy is doing it doesn't look like a bid for power it doesn't look like a bid for
00:21:44.800
money it doesn't look like um it doesn't look like there's any direct payoff for him other than
00:21:53.200
completing his work of making the country safer i have to i gotta say that my respect
00:22:00.400
for what he apparently is doing is very high very high very much appreciated well united airlines has
00:22:11.680
had a fifth infant incident in what the news calls fifth incident in over a week may i take a moment to
00:22:20.880
say if you're writing a headline and you ever write this headline it's the fifth incident in over a week
00:22:30.400
uh here's a here's a better way it might be the fifth incident in let's say 10 days
00:22:39.680
but you know what is over a week everything else
00:22:45.760
you don't say you don't say the fifth time in over a week because over a week could be 10 years
00:22:51.360
that's over a week yeah you know what uh i've uh eaten the potato uh 700 times in over a week
00:23:06.880
i have i'm not even exaggerating i've eaten the potato 700 times in over a week
00:23:13.600
yeah and i'm not going to stop um anyway united airlines so they continue to have these mechanical
00:23:22.320
problems the mechanical problems all seem to have the same character that there's some component of
00:23:27.840
the airplane that falls off am i right like tire falls off part falls off a wing door falls off
00:23:37.120
and i would like to suggest that if they have maybe one more incident in over a week
00:23:45.040
that they have to change the names from united airlines to mostly united but some things fall off
00:23:53.280
it's longer but i think more accurate fly united no night not completely united mostly united but some
00:24:01.760
things fall off you gotta expect that all right well uh axios is talking about the huge increase in
00:24:12.000
black and latino voters who are moving to the republican side and they show some
00:24:18.880
apparently it's the it looks to be according to polling the most massive swing for black and hispanic voters
00:24:27.520
since uh a long time ago 60s now what is the explanation for that what's the explanation migration economy
00:24:52.640
okay so axios should not be considered a genuine news source or more of a uh that they appear to
00:25:00.880
present themselves as more of a you know biased political actor as most of the news does
00:25:07.280
but here's what they say uh the intrigue this is part of their story the intrigue the drop-off meaning
00:25:13.200
the drop-off of support for democrats by that community comes even after trump made
00:25:19.840
several racist and bigoted comments about immigrants and people of color
00:25:28.720
now do you think if i click on them i will find them to be racist and bigoted comments
00:25:35.200
do you think that's news or was that just some person's opinion
00:25:40.720
well you know if you could click on them yourself you'll find that somebody has
00:25:44.080
decided to interpret normal language as bigoted you know like they usually do so that's not really news
00:25:50.560
that's just uh um bias basically and then they say the uh the biggest loss might be uh at least somebody
00:26:00.320
said is somebody else said actually is uh people under 30. so now biden is losing young people black people
00:26:09.040
and hispanics did did axios tell the story right did they frame this story right so they're losing young
00:26:19.200
people blacks and hispanics what what's missing in the story see anything missing let me tell you the trick
0.91
00:26:29.360
that's being played here there is a big trick being played this is misdirection
00:26:34.240
when they tell you that black and hispanic and young people are moving toward republicans
00:26:40.800
the real story is what they're not telling you the real story is the democrat party has become the
00:26:46.000
party of women do you know why they don't want to tell you that and by the way it is the black men uh
0.69
00:26:53.840
at least the black men i know are tending to be a little bit more pro-trump the black women less so but
00:27:00.880
also a little bit i think they i think that the uh left-leaning media can't tell you that men are
00:27:08.720
going to the dem the republican side do you know why because that would be too influential it would
0.86
00:27:14.800
be too influential if you hear that blacks and hispanics and young people are moving to the other
00:27:20.240
side you might say to yourself well you know i'm not one of those people but it's an interesting story
00:27:26.880
but if you heard that men were going to one side you'd have some real questions because the men know
00:27:33.680
how to protect the country and you know i i hate to sound too much like tucker carlson but uh there's a
00:27:42.240
lot of justification there's i would i would claim same as uh same as tucker says that the justification for
00:27:50.240
uh racial discrimination is gone basically i mean there's no reason to do it because the difference
00:27:57.840
between any one individual of the same of the same race is so different you know there's no such thing
1.00
00:28:04.560
as an average black guy like that's not a thing every black person is so infinitely different from every
1.00
00:28:11.200
other just like every white person is infinitely different from every other but gender is really big
00:28:18.080
difference right so gender is the one that's really big difference and one of the big differences
0.65
00:28:24.080
which i will claim to my death is that men are smarter about uh security and and survival and
00:28:32.160
protection women are better at you know nurturing and a whole bunch of other stuff you know better
1.00
00:28:38.080
better verbal skills you know a whole bunch of stuff they're better at doing better at college at the
00:28:41.760
moment etc so i'm not it's not a competition it's just that we're not all the same and there's some
00:28:48.320
average differences and you're seeing it here and i think that if the democrats started saying that men
00:28:54.640
are leaving the democrat party that the women who are remaining would say wait what
0.99
00:29:03.280
so i think a third of the democrats would say yeah that's good because the men were the problem anyway
00:29:10.000
but i think two-thirds of the democrat women would say wait a minute what did you just say you're
1.00
00:29:16.400
saying all the the men who are democrats are leaving i think that would be the end of the democrat party
00:29:23.760
so i think the framing that it that it's racial is missing the far bigger framing that abortion in
00:29:30.480
particular is primarily women right the fear of trump as the the big old uh whatever
00:29:39.600
mostly women and the men who don't want to disagree with women basically so as long as we see the
00:29:46.640
differences between the parties as racial uh there is some big movement but if it ever became more
00:29:53.200
honest and shows that it was basically a democrats for the party of women and the republicans are more
00:29:59.680
party of men and women who agree with them basically all right let's leave this voter id issue you know
00:30:08.640
i've never met a single real person and i will i'm going to say as i said on x there's no real person who
00:30:15.840
thinks that it's okay to not to have voter id for voting i've never met one have you have you ever met
00:30:23.440
a real person who says yeah that makes sense because i don't think black people can get ids now sometimes
00:30:29.840
you'll meet somebody who says that it's because they heard it on the news but here's how you fix it
00:30:35.840
there's no black people who can't get ids they get ids because they need it for every other part of
00:30:41.200
civilization and and if there is a black person or a white person or any other kind of person
00:30:48.480
who can't get an id are you seriously telling me you you want them to vote
00:30:53.440
if they can't get an id an id is pretty basic stuff and you think that that person is going to add to
00:31:03.120
the decision-making quality of the republic no there is no real person who thinks it's a good idea
00:31:10.560
not to have voter id when we have id for every other little trivial thing and everybody thinks that's
00:31:16.000
a good idea so this is purely a press um you know bad people who want these things to happen so there
00:31:24.960
were two lawyers who testified uh today or recently uh against requiring proof of citizenship to vote
00:31:33.120
or id i guess and uh and they're both uh former employees of george sorris's open society do you
00:31:40.640
think that those two people in their private world personally believe that it's a good idea
00:31:47.680
to not have id for voting no of course not no they're either paid or they're lying but they
00:31:53.120
definitely don't believe that and i want to stop acting like this is some kind of political discussion
00:32:00.240
this is not a difference of political opinion the citizens are all on the same page on this we're just
00:32:06.240
being gaslighted and screwed in some some way by some group or groups of people but to pretend that
00:32:13.600
anybody's on the other side of this is absurd it's just absurd now when i posted that no real person is
00:32:22.800
actually in favor of this uh elon musk weighed in and said 100 and then uh a number of people said this
00:32:31.280
but uh elon musk said it as well this morning he said the exact same people who said everyone had to
00:32:37.680
have a vaccine id also say no ideas needed for voting i mean you don't need a lot of reasons to know that
00:32:44.080
this isn't a real issue this is a an issue specifically to make it easier to cheat
00:32:51.120
it's to make it easier to cheat now if you tell me there's any other reason
00:33:00.000
there isn't there isn't don't tell me there's some other reason nobody thinks that that's just
00:33:06.240
something that people are saying on tv no actual honest living person believes any of this it's just
00:33:14.640
to make it easier to cheat so clearly so here's what would be a good strategy for republicans to
00:33:21.920
win everything stop talking about everything except this and every time you have a conversation with
00:33:27.840
the press and every time you have a conversation that any democrat can hear and say let me ask you
00:33:32.880
just one question what do you think is the reason they don't want to have voter id there's only one
00:33:39.200
reason the other reasons are stupid and if you believe what you were told that black people can't
0.89
00:33:45.120
get ids well you're a fucking racist and whoever told you is too because there's no evidence of that
0.97
00:33:50.160
whatsoever that's purely racist so you're not only a racist but you would be favoring the people
00:33:56.160
who clearly are trying to do something illegitimate and you know it and and just go from there
00:34:03.360
say republicans want people who are citizens to vote
00:34:06.400
that tells you everything you need to know the republicans want citizens to vote
00:34:12.880
and that we know that they really are here and they're really voting for
00:34:16.480
you know they're eligible to vote there is no second reason for wanting no id it's only to cheat
00:34:26.560
it's only to cheat there's no other reason and if you say that enough i think people will
00:34:33.520
figure it out pretty quickly because here's the thing people people are fairly primed to expect
00:34:40.720
they're getting screwed you know by companies by the government we're all we all expect we're getting
00:34:46.400
screwed and when you say there's literally no other reason for this voter id thing i think people's
00:34:52.880
we're always getting screwed thing just clicks in they go oh yeah that does sound mighty suspicious now
00:34:59.600
they bring it up it's a real easy sale it's a hard sale to say that the biden family did something
00:35:06.640
bad with ukraine let let me explain the total sophistication of the american voter when they're
00:35:14.320
they're faced with the ukraine situation what yeah you see there was this whole network where hunter set up
00:35:22.720
and his business person said this and there was a diamond that got lost and you know what was it
00:35:27.760
not when he was in office but there were some things in office and then it was a phone call
00:35:31.760
and then the average voter says what you can't you can't make a sale with any of that basically
00:35:40.320
all the complicated stuff are just things that people like you know you and i talk about
00:35:45.040
you know the the one percent who do this for a hobby or or professionally like we care about that
00:35:52.080
stuff i'll dig in a little bit and find out who's who's who's right who's not but the average person
00:35:56.880
doesn't know anything about what's going on ask the average person about the the nuance of whether
00:36:03.520
tick tock should be banned just the average person who knows you a little bit about the news but not a lot
00:36:11.120
you will hear the most ridiculous opinions because they don't understand the nuance
00:36:17.920
but here's something they totally understand there's only one reason that they're not requiring voter
00:36:22.720
id it's so that they can rig the election how many normal citizens can immediately understand that
00:36:30.320
argument all of them immediately 100 right away and how many of them are already primed
00:36:38.640
to think that is the real reason all of them they're all primed right now a few of them are going to
00:36:44.640
say oh i was told by cnn that black people can't get ids but you could change their mind in about a
00:36:51.280
minute find me one black person who can't get an id find an interview with one find a survey anything
00:36:59.360
find find me a link show me a guy who's on video saying yeah you know i've been black all my life
00:37:07.440
and i'll tell you every time i go to get an id i can't figure it out or i can't afford it i don't
00:37:13.440
know what to do seems like all these white people got these nice ids but i can't figure out how to get
00:37:18.080
one no that doesn't exist do you know why because every black person like every other person can get
1.00
00:37:25.120
an id and it was never real so you could mock people for believing something that even their
00:37:31.280
own team has no evidence for that's different usually if you're if you're debating climate
00:37:38.160
change for example you know both sides will show their own preferred data ooh my data says yes ooh
00:37:44.320
my data says no but not in this case not in this case there's no other argument there's no data there's
00:37:51.520
no link there's no story there's there's no witness there's not even a single person not one
00:38:00.720
anyway everybody can figure that out um and wokeness one of my favorite follows on x
00:38:06.880
uh did an experiment where it asked the amazon site for a list of black owned businesses presumably so you
00:38:14.720
could you know give them your support and it gave uh it gave you a list of black owned businesses very
00:38:22.320
good if you'd like to support the black owned businesses you've got a real easy way to find them
00:38:28.480
so then n woke just said huh let's see if amazon will give me a list of white owned businesses
00:38:34.240
uh no i said that would be too racist and inappropriate and absolutely not you kidding me
00:38:46.080
now if you're not watching elon musk's comments he's going at each of these little stories and just
00:38:52.160
labeling them racist and and i think it's very powerful when he does that because he does concentrate
00:38:58.640
attention they are all racist these these are just racist things they're racist because treating the
00:39:05.520
he races differently in a public way is as racist as you can get there's no there's no argument about
00:39:12.480
that um well let's see what else happened uh the rabbit hole another good account on x um
00:39:24.000
he was uh tweeting or posting about uh newspapers mentioning the murderers race so there have been some
00:39:31.120
surveys to find out when not just newspapers but the media um how often do they mention the race of
00:39:39.280
the murderer if it's white versus black versus something else well here's the numbers uh white
00:39:45.920
offenders were mentioned roughly one out of four articles so for example one out of four times if it was a
00:39:52.640
white person they'd say a white man you know killed somebody for example but um if it was a black offender
0.89
00:40:01.520
only one time in 17 did the article mention the race uh and if it's a hispanic offender only one in 33
00:40:11.600
would mention it was hispanic i'm not sure i understand that difference but
00:40:17.040
it and that of course is a super racist as elon musk weighed in and said yes that's super racist
00:40:29.040
all right uh russia's putin says uh that he wouldn't use nuclear weapons in ukraine but he would be
00:40:35.840
ready to use them if russia's existence is threatened now isn't that a nice vague statement
00:40:41.920
that makes you feel good so if i understand this the only thing that would prevent putin from
00:40:48.000
nuking me is his own opinion and nobody else's just his own opinion of whether
00:40:56.320
russia's existence is threatened huh i wonder if anybody in a political role has ever used hyperbole
00:41:04.160
or exaggerated a threat to take control or gain some power over something
00:41:08.880
hmm well that's scary now i don't believe that uh um putin would use a nuke because using a nuke
00:41:16.640
would be the riskiest thing that he could do for his own life and for russia by far the riskiest
00:41:23.840
uh and he's not crazy he doesn't show signs of he doesn't show signs of any biden dementia
00:41:29.600
that i can see um i don't know about his overall health but his mind seems sharp and
00:41:34.640
no i don't think there's any chance he's going to use nukes it looks like he just has to wait it out
00:41:40.880
and grind up the bodies until something happens i saw uh david sacks who often is talking and posting
00:41:48.320
about why we should wind up the war in ukraine because we can't win and he posted today that
00:41:55.120
people ask him you know why does he keep going out there and you know talking about this and he said he
00:42:01.600
was uh trying to wear people down with the truth and then and then the uh war will be over
00:42:09.360
now i love his attitude he's going to wear people down with the truth and then once we understand the
00:42:15.760
real situation we will all lock hands and make a good decision well i don't know i don't know if i live
00:42:25.360
in that country do i do i live in a country where a logical rational argument that shows the real facts
00:42:39.520
the answer is it depends who's doing it it really depends who's doing it i do think
00:42:44.240
sacks has changed people's minds because he's credible and he's good at what he does and
00:42:50.240
you know his arguments are always strong so if anybody could do it you know if it's doable
00:42:57.440
there's a very small group of people who could make a difference but he might be one of them he
00:43:02.640
might actually be one of the most persuasive people in the public domain at the moment and so i certainly
00:43:08.880
welcome his uh his viewpoint on this it seems it seems intended for nothing except making the country
00:43:15.440
better like there's no there's no way you know it's just a financial thing it's not just a political
00:43:22.240
thing it looks like just a a patriot trying to end the war and knowing that the government can't do it
00:43:30.000
and he has to jump in that's what it feels like to me it feels like people who think oh damn it i've
00:43:35.920
got the spider-man problem that's what it is it's a spider-man problem i think elon's got the spider-man
00:43:43.200
problem i think david sacks has the spider-man problem and i know i have the spider-man problem
00:43:49.040
you know the spider-man problem with a great power comes great responsibility
00:43:55.200
so some people are promoting things and advocating things because they want to make some money or make
00:44:01.200
a name for themselves or be right or you know a whole bunch of reasons for why people do things
00:44:06.000
but i can tell you i feel this deeply i feel that having taken care of myself and the people
00:44:13.040
close to me that i have just an embedded built-in almost genetic responsibility to take care of
00:44:22.560
the wider tribe you know the country so i think that's what drives a number of the people that i
00:44:30.240
call the internet dads um you know they're not doing it for money that's for sure because it's not good
00:44:36.880
for their incomes to be divisive even if they're trying to help it ends up being divisive well here's
00:44:42.720
an interesting stat i don't know if it's true but have you heard that 30 to 50 of the population
00:44:48.080
doesn't have an inner mile monologue how many of you would say that of yourself you don't have an
00:44:54.480
inner monologue like there's just a voice that's talking all the time
00:44:58.400
i want to see if it looks like 30 to 50 percent of you have that
00:45:06.480
because i don't believe that i think it's a smaller percentage i think i think it's real
00:45:11.760
but i think it's smaller than that yeah my head is like a it's like the star wars bar scene it's like
00:45:20.800
like every every damn thing happening in there you know it's what elon musk says you wouldn't want
00:45:26.960
to live in his head i believe that i think there's a lot going on in there and not everybody could
00:45:32.560
survive that anyway so suppose it's true 30 let's say there's some percentage let's take the low number
00:45:40.640
30 of the population doesn't have an inner mile long that's about the same number just observationally
00:45:47.520
you know just my own opinion it seems like about the same number as people who can't tell a personal
00:45:52.240
story i've noted this before there's some people who can't tell a personal story you'd say ah tell us
00:45:59.840
about the time you succeeded at something or tell us a story about the you know the most embarrassing
00:46:05.840
moment you had or something like that and there are people who go hmm yeah yeah nothing really i have
00:46:14.080
nothing and i think that's weird and then i've also noted a number of times that you know i've
00:46:20.800
given a lot of um funny speeches in public probably hundreds of them by this time and you notice that
00:46:29.040
no matter what you say or how funny you are 30 of the audience will just look at you and in my
00:46:35.040
experience 30 of the public literally doesn't have a sense of humor like actually literally don't have
00:46:41.760
one and they're faking it they're literally faking it the way they fake it is first of all they avoid
00:46:48.400
entertainment that is for humor so you invite your friend over and say hey i've got this funny movie
00:46:54.160
you want to watch it in my house the person who doesn't have a sense of humor is just going to say
00:46:59.280
they're busy because what they can't say is i don't even know what this humor thing is i would just
00:47:05.440
sit there and stare at it i'm not going to be laughing because i i don't know it just doesn't work for me
00:47:10.480
so do you think it's all the same people so i'm just going to throw this hypothesis out there maybe
00:47:16.880
it's not three different groups maybe the group that doesn't have an inner monologue doesn't have
00:47:21.360
a sense of humor and can't tell a story because i feel they're all related i feel like they're all related
00:47:28.240
so uh now some would say that that would be the number of npcs the people who are like effectively
00:47:36.960
biological ai they're just wandering around they don't have an actual life because they don't have
0.97
00:47:42.800
an inner dialogue and they they don't even laugh at things like ai ai wouldn't laugh at anything
00:47:49.200
but it might identify that something is fits the form of a joke but it wouldn't laugh
00:47:56.560
so it makes me suspect that we are already one-third cyborgs uh battle star galactica style
00:48:05.280
you know the cilons the cilons and that that's a battle star galactica's famous sci-fi and part of
00:48:14.000
the story was that the some number of humans were actually really really well done androids so good
00:48:21.760
you can't even tell it tell with a medical exam feels like that i'm not saying that's true it just
00:48:27.280
feels like it all right um apparently the biden budget that he's promoting for the country would
00:48:35.200
spend hundreds of millions to train school teachers in dei isn't that just reparations i i think we
00:48:44.880
should stop saying that reparations is a different conversation from dei now the first thing you're
00:48:50.560
going to say is scott dei is not just about the black public you know dei is about any groups
00:48:57.440
that are not getting a fair shake in society no that's not true i'm sorry if somebody told you
00:49:03.200
that if you took the black population out of the dei conversation the whole thing would fall apart
0.99
00:49:09.840
do you do you think that you could get the women and the gays and the hispanics that'd be powerful
00:49:15.440
enough to have dei organizations i don't think so i i think that the uh the black population is the you
00:49:24.320
know the heart and soul of the dei and then the rest are sort of freeloaders and i don't mean that
00:49:30.960
as an insult i mean i should say free rider a free rider not a freeloader freeloader is insulting
00:49:37.040
i didn't mean it insulting i mean that they just get the benefit of being put into the disadvantaged
00:49:42.320
group but if there were no black people ever in this country there would be no dei do you agree
1.00
00:49:49.200
am i going too far or would you agree that it just wouldn't be happening except that the black
1.00
00:49:57.360
public is apparently powerful enough there's enough people enough people support the idea
00:50:02.320
yeah yeah so to me dei is reparations so i'm not in favor of spending it in either case
00:50:12.000
but if we're going to spend it and it gets approved i'm going to say that is reparations
00:50:15.920
because that has the same effect the effect of dei in the the theoretical effect is that you just
00:50:24.000
hire better but equally qualified people from disadvantaged groups that's the theory the reality is that never
0.93
00:50:31.440
happens because it can't if it could happen it would happen but it can't it's like logically
00:50:38.560
impossible just because the numbers involved no not because of any genetic differences no not because
00:50:44.400
any racial differences no not because of any any gender differences but just there's not enough
00:50:50.080
people who have already gone through the pipeline of training to have enough of them for all the
00:50:54.560
companies that are scrambling to improve their diversity so given that it does seem to me that
00:51:01.760
the net effect is that white people will be kept out of jobs black people will be promoted even when
0.99
00:51:08.240
they have lesser qualifications as reparations and i would say that we've had 30 years of it so far at least
00:51:16.080
40 i think so probably 40 years of dei like activity so you know in the old days it was called reverse
00:51:23.280
discrimination i think it's already paid i think the bill is paid i declare the bill paid and the
00:51:30.240
reparations question put to bed whether whether you like it or not so i'm not saying i'm for it or against
00:51:38.080
it you know necessarily i'm just saying it's already paid we don't have to talk about it anymore
00:51:42.480
all right let's talk about tick tock joe rogan looked at the terms of service this is scariest
00:51:48.800
thing you've ever seen so apparently when you sign up for tick tock you agree that they can
00:51:54.960
basically have all your information but including your keystrokes
00:52:02.960
including information on devices that you don't use for tick tock
00:52:09.040
just hold that in your head for a second if they can track your keystrokes they know exactly
00:52:16.880
everything you're doing all your passwords let me say it again if they're tracking your keystrokes
00:52:25.120
they have your password into every one of your accounts and you're signing that away you're
00:52:30.160
basically signing to give your passwords away because it would be legal it wouldn't be legal to get into
00:52:37.360
your account but it's legal they have them if you sign that so let's see what else are they doing um
00:52:50.800
is i think if you use one of those logons where you say um i'll use my google log logon to get into
00:52:57.840
it i think that's what it's saying then they could go to any device that used a google log on
00:53:03.440
you're completely other devices and find out all your activity and your other devices
00:53:08.320
now it's it's written so broadly that couldn't possibly be something you don't want to associate
00:53:12.880
with so yesterday um i started the process to get a dedicated machine just for tick tock so i don't plan
00:53:21.200
to look at content because that would be crazy because i don't want to get hypnotized but
00:53:26.880
um i am going to post on it because it's not going away and i'm going to post on it with a dedicated
00:53:35.040
separate machine that's not in any way connected to anything else and i'm definitely not going to use
00:53:39.120
a password that's used on any other device i wouldn't even do that
00:53:43.680
so us intel the director of national intelligence dni says that china uses tick tock to impact u.s elections
00:53:58.000
he says quote we cannot rule out that the ccp would use it it is extraordinary the degree to
1.00
00:54:04.320
which china are developing frameworks for collecting foreign data and their capacity to turn around and
00:54:10.240
use it to target audiences um i guess tick tock accounts run by a chinese government propaganda arm
00:54:19.600
somehow we can tell who they are uh targeted candidates from both political parties during the
00:54:25.040
midterms in 2022 so that's our own intelligence people say that china did use bots i guess on tick tock
00:54:32.480
now what they don't say is that they know that tick tock is you know push the heat button
00:54:38.480
but if they had bots and um and we know they were bots it means that tick tock knew they were bots
00:54:45.520
and didn't get rid of them or not or didn't get rid of them fast enough all right so um let's talk
00:54:55.600
about this bill this tick tock bill to ban it so the first thing you need to know is that tick tock
00:55:02.880
is not going to be banned and part of the reason is the bill was written it looks like it was written
00:55:09.520
intentionally not to be passed because it would give um it would give the ability for the government
00:55:16.560
well here here's here's the setup tucker carlson gives us a little setup he posted today in a classified
00:55:22.640
briefing this afternoon it must have been yesterday uh attended by officials from the binding
00:55:27.680
justice department aoc claimed that elon committed quote election interference in 2022 by quote changing
00:55:36.560
the algorithms on x to alter the results of the midterms now all we all he really did was get rid
00:55:42.240
of the bias so she's saying that getting rid of the bias altered the midterms and that's election
00:55:48.320
interference now suppose you took that to be true suppose you said well that's a reasonable opinion aoc
00:55:55.680
totally reasonable that if somebody changed something on their platform and it affected
00:56:00.240
the race well that must be election interference did you know that the tick tock ban if passed
00:56:07.680
would allow the government to force the sale of any social media platform that interferes in elections
00:56:15.760
so all all they would have to do to take tick tock away from twitter from musk is to make the claim
00:56:29.280
that he's interfering with elections i don't even think they have to prove it in a court of law
00:56:39.440
who in the world is going to sign that the fucking thing do you think you can find enough people to
0.97
00:56:44.320
assign this they'll basically say that the government can take your social media platform away if the
00:56:49.840
government says you're interfering with the election now don't you think there was a way to
00:56:55.920
make this only about tick tock or only about companies owned by adversaries i'm pretty sure
00:57:02.080
they could have walled that off don't you think you don't think they could have walled that off and said
00:57:07.360
hmm let's let's make this only applied to something controlled by a foreign adversary
00:57:12.880
pretty easy to do i do not believe that our constitution bars us from blocking adversaries
00:57:20.640
from doing business in the united states i don't i don't think any freedoms apply to the chinese government
00:57:26.160
so how did they get 50 bipartisan people to sign it do you know how you get 50 people to
00:57:36.240
support a bill and this is bipartisan both sides 100 of the people in the committee
00:57:41.840
do you know how you get that to happen you write some legislation that nobody's ever going to approve
00:57:49.040
pretty easy to say yes to something that nobody's going to sign isn't it this is so not signable
00:57:55.280
there's no chance it's going to happen and there are 35 billion other reasons it's not going to happen
00:58:00.720
which is a specific gigantic donor to the republican party who's got 35 billion dollars some say
00:58:08.160
uh value in tick tock ownership and that's enough money to make the government do anything he wants
00:58:14.560
you know that right that's enough money to make the government do anything you want
00:58:20.800
so he just wants he just has to want it and of course he does nobody wants to lose 35 billion dollars
00:58:27.360
so yeah there's no chance that the government is stronger than 35 billion dollars all focused in one
00:58:32.640
place well or let's say a billion dollars because because he'd burn a billion dollars
00:58:38.000
just to get what he wants the government cannot survive or cannot stand up against a billion dollars
00:58:46.400
focused on any one topic the government has no power over that he has all the power so if he wants
00:58:53.680
he doesn't want it banned well it's kind of the end of the story he has the power to make it not happen
00:58:59.280
so you should expect a number of people who are beholden to such um a a person who contributes that
00:59:08.640
much to the republicans uh you should expect them to have some weird explanations of why they
00:59:18.400
speaking of weird explanations for why you'd be opposed to the band here's ran paul
00:59:23.360
he says reactionaries who want to ban tick tock oh interesting if you want to ban tick tock you're
00:59:31.360
a reactionary huh let us examine the history of ran paul and say does ran paul start an argument with a
00:59:41.920
emotional uh insult label is that his normal mode does that look like what you're used to
00:59:50.000
because that's not the ran paul i'm used to the one i'm used to usually leads with a logical
00:59:57.920
rational argument and then challenges the government to tell him what's wrong with it and then they can't
01:00:04.640
and that that's what makes him ran paul what makes him ran paul is not doing this
01:00:10.160
he just called people in his own party and the other party as well reactionaries
01:00:13.840
fuck you ran paul fuck you very much yeah you don't need to insult me
0.69
01:00:22.080
am i a reactionary because i have that opinion i've changed my opinion
01:00:26.160
since since tick tock can't be banned i don't think there's any room for an opinion
01:00:32.320
it doesn't matter if i want it to it doesn't matter if i think it's a good idea it's like israel
01:00:36.880
you can have an opinion but why not now who and israel is just going to do what they
01:00:44.800
whatever they can do that they need to do anyway so uh starting with reactionaries is a big red flag
01:00:52.960
that you're not going to take this argument seriously and i would expect that what you say
01:00:57.040
next is not going to be as logical as what we normally expect from ran paul let's say
01:01:01.360
he says the reactionaries who want to ban tick tock claim the data can't be secured because the
01:01:07.280
quote algorithm is china is in china this is called a um what do you call this a straw man
01:01:17.200
the straw man is where you characterize the other people's argument in a stupid way
01:01:22.880
have you ever heard anybody say that i haven't because it would be stupid nobody's going to say
0.58
01:01:29.120
uh that tick tock is can't be secured because the algorithm is in china who would even say that
01:01:39.040
that doesn't even make sense from any like technological standpoint so no that's a straw man
01:01:44.320
so he started with an insult and then a straw man is that ran paul that you know does ran paul give
01:01:52.080
you a straw man for a argument since when i've never seen him do it i always see him say things that
01:01:58.880
make complete sense always but that's a bad way to start an opinion let's see what else he says
01:02:05.600
so he says it's not true that the uh the claim that the data can't be secured because the algorithm
01:02:10.960
is in china here's here's the truth he says the truth is the algorithm runs in the us in oracle cloud
01:02:19.040
with their review of the code not china so in other words oracle is the only one that sees the algorithm
01:02:25.200
that runs in the united states do you care what server the algorithm runs on how was that ever
01:02:34.400
part of the argument i don't care where it runs i care what it does do you think that uh do you think
01:02:42.880
that there's an entity in oracle that understands the algorithm so are you telling me that if somebody
01:02:49.840
at uh byte dance or tick tock pushes the heat button literally it's called the heat button
01:02:56.880
to boost the signal of something do you think that uh somebody over in oracle is going to be there
01:03:02.880
they'll be doing their work like ding ding ding ding hold on somebody over in china pushed the heat
01:03:11.440
button and that signal came over to our our servers over an oracle and the and and the alert is telling me
01:03:18.000
that something happened no because the code would be working the way it was written it would be
01:03:25.600
working fine it wouldn't be anything that they would say do you think that the people in oracle can see
01:03:30.880
persuasion as it's embedded in in the let's say the outcome of the product no because you can't find it
01:03:40.400
persuasion if it's done right you can't find it so this is an absurd argument um and then he says maybe
01:03:49.600
we should examine the facts and then he says uh they want to ban tick tock because it's owned by china
01:03:56.960
and ran paul says tick tock is not owned by china here's what ran paul says he says 60 of the company is
01:04:05.040
owned by u.s and international investors 20 is owned by the company founders 20 is owned by company
01:04:14.160
employees including 7 000 americans and the ceo of tick tock is from singapore not china so then ran paul
01:04:22.560
says so ask yourself why they keep repeating this lie to scare you so the lie is that technically china
01:04:29.840
doesn't own it that's what ran paul is arguing that technically they don't own it the only thing
01:04:38.800
that they have is the ability to tell the people who do own it exactly what to do or their business
01:04:45.360
will go away do you think ran paul is unaware that the government of china can tell tick tock what
01:04:53.920
to do and tick tock's damn well going to do it because the penalty would be far too big do you
01:05:00.480
think he doesn't know that of course he knows that everybody knows it so he's going to argue like a lawyer
01:05:07.440
instead of a ophthalmologist he's gonna he's gonna turn into a lawyer and argue the technical details
01:05:14.240
of who the ownership is when the chinese government can tell it what it wants it to do and has to do it
01:05:20.000
do you really think that this argument is what he actually believes i can't read minds well let's
01:05:28.000
just say it's a little bit inconsistent with the hyper rational person we've known for years so
01:05:33.520
whatever's going on here has nothing to do with these arguments because these are stupid
0.90
01:05:38.160
and he knows it it's the he knows it part that bugs me right if i thought he didn't know
01:05:44.640
what he was doing it wouldn't bother me at all but he knows he knows so
01:05:53.680
there's also reports that rumble was talking about either buying tick tock maybe with other people
01:05:58.320
i don't know how they'd afford it um or or offering the new rumble network they got a cloud network that
01:06:06.080
will compete with the other big clouds and uh so that they'd be willing to uh step up and
01:06:13.920
and be part of that i don't think that's going to happen and uh i don't think the ban is real
01:06:22.240
would you like to hear a good conspiracy theory
01:06:26.560
all right this is not based on any knowledge it's just if you have a suspicious mind
01:06:34.800
it looks like this here are things we know uh there was a planned public offering of tick tock that
01:06:42.240
the chinese government said no to so tick tock wanted to do an ipo and china said no
01:06:50.160
well how is that possible how is that possible when china doesn't even own them how is that possible
01:06:57.760
i'm all confused rand paul rand paul can you can you explain to me how china told them they can't have
01:07:03.040
an ipo when they don't even own them don't they know that 60 is owned by other countries are they
01:07:15.120
god the things that we're being asked to believe it's just it's just it's you can't even hold it in
01:07:20.960
your mind it's so crazy so we know that tick tock tried to have a liquidity event meaning that would
01:07:29.760
be the beginning of a process in which the biggest investors could get their money out if they wanted
01:07:35.520
to after it went public but now that's not going to happen suppose and i don't know this to be true
01:07:42.960
but suppose it looks like there's no time in the future you'll be able to get your money out
01:07:47.520
what's the point of investing if you can never get your money out how does that work like getting
01:07:55.920
your money out is really important to the whole investment process right if you never can get your
01:08:00.400
money it's not really an investment so we've got an american investor who's got some say 35 billion
01:08:07.120
dollars worth of ownership of the tick tock company by dance now is it possible
01:08:17.520
that a again this is just fun conspiracy stuff i have no evidence for this whatsoever i just live
01:08:25.200
in the real world and i've seen lots of clever things happen that were not obvious on the surface
01:08:31.120
if i were a billionaire and i could not get my money out of tick tock because the chinese government
0.69
01:08:35.920
said no you're not going to do a ipo and i don't know when we'll ever let you what i would do is i would
01:08:42.480
get my friends in congress both the democrats and the republicans i would make them sit down and say
01:08:47.520
make me a fake bill that looks like it could get passed but make sure it doesn't
01:08:56.160
give me a fake bill that the media will say is like a real ban but i don't want a band the only thing
01:09:04.240
i want is for the chinese government to say oh crap we better let them sell the american business
01:09:10.480
because otherwise tick tock's in trouble so we could get some money out of it by letting them sell
01:09:17.360
but if the american market goes away that that's really going to be a problem could it be
01:09:23.360
that an investor or investors are using the ban only as leverage to get china to agree
01:09:33.360
to let bite dance divest the american market could it be that the biggest investor i think his name is
01:09:40.400
yes y-a-s-s could it be that the real play is for him to own his own american social media company
01:09:51.440
that is the piece of bite dances market that had been theirs take it with him in return for
0.90
01:09:58.880
um let's say china keeping his 35 billion dollars so could he for let's say 35 billion dollars own the
01:10:07.440
entire uh part of bite dance that ran in america would that make him an elon musk kind of a billionaire
01:10:16.400
so he would not only have other business but like jeff bezos and like other rich people carlos sims
01:10:24.400
rupert murdoch it's always good to own a big media company if you can
01:10:31.760
so if you start with the assumption that if you're smart enough to own 35 billion dollars worth of
01:10:38.000
bite dance you're also smart enough to figure out all the different ways you can capitalize on that
01:10:44.080
and if the possibility of monetizing it was completely impossible because he would never
01:10:49.920
be able to get in a liquidity event well he might have found a workaround so the perfect situation would
01:10:57.440
be that we pretend that there's going to be a ban every and you get uh 50 people to act like it's a
01:11:05.280
sure thing and then it gets carved off and then there's a billionaire who leans republican
01:11:13.680
who leans republican because he's he's known to be funding um republicans in a big way
01:11:20.960
you would have in this country instead of a left-leaning social media company you would have a
01:11:27.520
not necessarily right leaning but certainly closer to the middle um and it would completely neuter the
01:11:33.760
political impact of tick tock and give one person one of the most valuable process properties in the world
01:11:40.960
now could he do that with the help of let's say the rumble network well if you've got oracle that
01:11:48.960
can already handle some hosting stuff you've got the rumble network that would give you the capacity
01:11:54.880
all you need then is approval all you need is approval because i think you can handle the money
01:12:03.280
doesn't look like money is going to be a problem all you need is the approval
01:12:06.640
so i'm not going to say that that's likely or that anybody has that plan but uh every every single
01:12:15.760
bit of evidence suggests it would you agree would you agree that all all evidence suggests that the
01:12:24.400
the ban is not real and that must be part of a you know a bigger plan that's what it looks like
01:12:34.240
so um looks like uh haiti is going to have some mass migration coming our way
01:12:45.200
and here's my question um you know that we've heard reports that there are cannibals in haiti
01:12:53.440
which by the way i'm not sure is real and if it is real i'm not sure it's more than you know one or two
01:13:01.360
people so i don't think haiti is a big old cannibal country but i'm going to use this story just as a
01:13:08.320
as a mental experiment suppose you knew that three percent of the migrants were going to be cannibals
1.00
01:13:18.560
you don't know what three percent but you're pretty sure that you know there's enough cannibals over
1.00
01:13:23.680
there that three percent might be would you say that mass migration would be a good idea if uh you
01:13:29.440
didn't know which ones but three percent of them probably cannibals and if three percent is okay
01:13:36.320
and you say yourself you say to yourself well honestly three percent is a low number you know
01:13:41.360
three percent of any population is going to be bad people in one way or another so why would you
01:13:47.440
discriminate against the haitians who really need a hand they're in a bad way uh when when their ratio
01:13:55.120
of cannibals is no worse than anybody's ratio of murderers and whatever and i would say okay that's
0.98
01:14:01.360
reasonable you're trying not to be racist and uh i like your argument it's good of you to not be racist
01:14:08.000
but suppose i up that percentage now i tell you it's ten percent cannibals it's not ten percent
01:14:14.720
cannibals we're just doing a mental experiment what if it's ten percent cannibals now do you say well
01:14:21.840
you know what ten percent of people who are in america are not so good either so it'd be kind
01:14:28.560
of racist to say this one group or worse because their ten percent kills people and we got a bunch
01:14:34.160
of people who do bad things too rapists and killers so you know then people start disagreeing at that but
01:14:41.920
what if it's twenty percent what if twenty percent of them were known cannibals yeah we keep talking
01:14:51.280
about yes or no these all these questions should be percentage it shouldn't be yes no keep the southern
01:14:59.360
border open it's not a yes no question how about we say if if we can't certify that the number of people
01:15:07.840
coming in are as safe as the people already here you don't do it i don't know if we could do that
01:15:15.840
is the crime rate to the people coming in better or worse than the ones who are already here
01:15:22.000
if we can't certify that it keeps us at least as safe it seems like that'd be a good reason not to
01:15:26.640
do it all right the her testimony was fun and funny and i watched it way too much yesterday
01:15:32.560
um the republicans and the democrats saw two different movies on one screen the republicans
01:15:38.080
saw this uh that biden was proven guilty and for many decades having all kinds of locations with
01:15:46.800
classified documents he clearly knew it was wrong and he even said it on an audio recording so it's a
01:15:52.960
slam dunk case he's proven guilty and the only reason he wasn't prosecuted is because the prosecutor
01:15:59.440
special prosecutor special counsel whatever he is uh her determined that he was uh that the
01:16:06.960
that he couldn't necessarily convince a jury that biden had intent because biden's too senile
01:16:15.920
now i'm using the word senile her didn't use that but that's the republican version that the crime is
0.69
01:16:22.080
there and the only reason he's not being prosecuted is that his brain doesn't work
01:16:26.080
and i believe every republican heard that would you agree do you think every republican has that
01:16:34.320
interpretation i think so but what did the democrats hear they heard that uh biden was exonerated by the
01:16:41.520
report so so they're on television saying saying he's exonerated so what does somebody like cnn do
01:16:50.080
when they knew when they know that biden is just toast but they can't agree with the republicans
01:16:57.040
they know they can't agree with the republicans what they did was they would bring on people who
01:17:02.960
are willing to lie and just didn't challenge it i was i was watching poor anderson cooper he brings on
01:17:10.080
some democrat who just said the most outrageously obviously untrue stuff about it and and he didn't
01:17:17.760
challenge it he just let it stand so the funny part is that the hosts are completely aware of the
01:17:24.640
whole story right it's their job and they know that biden broke the law uh at least in terms of the
01:17:32.320
having the classified information he broke it way more than trump did trump's got the extra
01:17:38.960
the obstructing justice problem that uh biden doesn't have but the the actual testimony and
01:17:48.640
the evidence that her did and even the democrats are saying her looked pretty credible so by the way
01:17:55.200
let me give a compliment to the special counsel um you know i spend so much time just insulting
01:18:01.920
people who are doing bad jobs that i feel like i should stop and say you did a great job am i am i wrong
01:18:11.280
that her really made i think you made the country proud um i don't think that was biased i i i think
01:18:20.240
that both sides have people who are saying yeah this was a serious good job good job you don't get to
01:18:28.480
say that too often good job all right so really appreciate it as a citizen of the country i personally
01:18:34.960
appreciate the good work that her did now um he does her did say very clearly we did not exonerate
01:18:45.440
anybody we don't use that word in the report um but the difference of was he exonerated or was he
01:18:53.760
proven guilty seems to hinge on the reason he was not charged and the democrats are trying to tell you
01:19:01.840
gaslighting you basically that the reason he wasn't charged is they didn't find any evidence of crimes
01:19:07.440
and the real reason he wasn't charged is that not only is he guilty of the crimes but he's also guilty
01:19:12.400
of being fucking retarded so he's basically guilty of two things so her found him guilty of having a
0.97
01:19:20.880
defective brain and doing a crime and they're and the democrats are telling their audience that
01:19:28.240
that's exonerated no that's two problems one is you did the crime and you knew it and you knew it
01:19:36.160
everybody agrees he knew it that's not the issue the problem is that the jury would see him as so feeble
01:19:42.720
that they wouldn't get a conviction and there's no point wasting everybody's time
01:19:46.000
so that's the the insufficient evidence that her refers to is there's insufficient evidence that
0.66
01:19:55.200
biden knew what he was doing not insufficient evidence that it happened and that it was illegal
01:20:02.560
only insufficient evidence that a jury would believe he understood what he was doing
01:20:08.800
to me that's guilty twice am i counting wrong to me that's guilty twice once guilty of having a bad
01:20:20.320
brain just like we suspected and once guilty of doing a whole bunch of crimes involving classified stuff
01:20:27.440
now there was one little uh point that was fascinating in how two sides see it so apparently
01:20:32.720
there exists an audio recording of biden talking to his biographer and telling the biographer
01:20:38.480
that he went and got some classified documents and he was showing them to him but apparently if the
01:20:44.720
only evidence you have is the audio you can't really know if the document he showed him was classified
01:20:53.040
it might have been sitting next to some classified documents but it could have been in the box they had
01:20:58.080
some classified and some not so when he said it was classified did he know that they were classified
01:21:04.160
or did he just take them out of a box of classified documents but the one he had maybe not so classified
01:21:11.760
now that's the sort of distinction that her is making when he anticipates what a defense would be if it
01:21:18.560
went to court and the defense would be well technically you just heard an audio recording of the people
01:21:24.160
talking well i guess that's true did anybody see this document well no does it say classified on it we
01:21:32.080
don't know he was just talking about it so i agree with her that even though it seems to us
01:21:38.560
that you know it's just a confession on audio how clear could it be i can see how a lawyer could lawyer
01:21:43.920
that away so i actually agree with them that that was a weakness in their ability to get any kind of
01:21:49.920
prosecution uh we do know biden lied when he said i did not share classified information i did not with my
01:21:58.240
ghostwriter well i guess you could still you could argue he didn't lie if you say it's not confirmed
01:22:04.000
that it was really classified it's only confirmed that he said it it's only confirmed that he said it
01:22:10.720
and since he says things that are not true all the time it's a weird defense he says things that are not
01:22:17.680
true all the time all right um so uh did you notice that the fact checkers all disappeared during the her
01:22:29.600
testimony and the coverage can you imagine not having your fact checker checking the facts of all the
01:22:38.160
democrats who just lied on live tv yeah so anyway um so uh representative ken buck of colorado he's
01:22:50.000
gonna resign early he's not even gonna wait for the election and that will make the razor-thin majority
01:22:55.520
of the republicans so it's very risky for him to leave early and he said uh we've taken impeachment
01:23:03.280
we've made it a social media issue as opposed to a constitutional one this place just keeps going
01:23:08.080
down i don't really don't really want to spend my time here hmm so what would you call somebody
01:23:17.200
who becomes part of the system but then but then he rejects it what would be a good name for somebody
01:23:26.880
like that so he's he's uh his name is his actual name is ken buck and he's somebody who can buck the
01:23:38.160
system to leave early i wonder if he'll fly almost united when he goes home yeah he can buck he can
01:23:49.200
buck the system and there he is he's bucking it sure enough well funny willis uh we're gonna get a
01:23:54.560
uh the judge is going to decide whether funny should be removed from the case because of her
1.00
01:24:00.400
undisclosed romance were not disclosed accurately romance with the guy who she hired and gave too much
01:24:07.520
money to be the prosecutor now the interesting thing is if she's taken off then it would i guess leave
0.97
01:24:16.960
it would leave her jurisdiction and they'd have to find another place to do the trial which is not so easy
01:24:23.360
because most other places might be more rural and have far less resources to do a major thing like
01:24:29.600
this but the other possibility that somehow i just hadn't thought about well it's obvious once once
01:24:35.760
you read it is that another prosecutor could decide not to take the case
01:24:42.960
so the the way that this could end is that uh funny is taken off the case it's you know it's it's
01:24:50.240
presented to another prosecutor and the other prosecutor says you know i don't think there's
01:24:55.040
enough here what happens if it goes to a non-soros funded prosecutor i think it has to go to a soros
01:25:03.600
funded prosecutor or trump walks what do you think so that's an actual possibility
01:25:09.280
uh just another prosecutor will say yeah nah could happen all right ladies and gentlemen that concludes
01:25:18.640
the best live stream of the day i hope you found some value in that i'm going to say uh bye now and um
01:25:26.080
i wonder if i can click off individual let's see if i can do this i want to see if i enclose individual