Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2420 CWSA 03⧸21⧸24

00:00:00.000 coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing

00:00:05.280 that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now.

00:00:15.020 Oh, that's some good simultaneous sipping. Possibly the best I've had all day.

00:00:22.500 Well, we've got themes, we've got stories, we've got craziness. Oh, we've got it all this morning.

00:00:28.080 But first, a little update on Neuralink. So apparently there's the first, you probably

00:00:33.800 heard this already, but the first person to have a Neuralink brain chip that is helping that person

00:00:40.100 control the computer with his mind. And apparently it's working. There's a real human being with a

00:00:46.900 chip in his skull who's controlling a cursor on the screen with his mind. Now, if you don't think

00:00:54.360 that's cool, Elon Musk says that something called blindsight is next. So fairly soon,

00:01:01.540 the next thing they're going to take on is to see if they can make a blind person able to see.

00:01:07.020 And you really want to get freaked out? It includes blind people who have never seen, 1.00

00:01:14.160 who have never had sight. And somehow they think they can give sight

00:01:18.400 sight to somebody who's never had it by presumably putting the sight signals directly into the brain

00:01:26.000 somehow. I don't know the details, but just think about the fact that Elon Musk is out there

00:01:32.740 putting chips and brains and rockets in space and building electric cars. And I don't know why you

00:01:39.420 did this year, but yeah, he did well. I won the internet, somebody says. Oh, I don't know about

00:01:47.960 that. Well, here's an update. Let's file this under the least surprising news ever. See if you can top

00:01:56.900 this for least surprising news. The Pope is opposed to violence. No, that's not it. That's what I always

00:02:05.520 use as a joke. Once a year, the news reports that the Pope still very much against violence and it

00:02:12.180 makes it makes a headline. All right. Here's the one that is even more obvious than the Pope is

00:02:19.540 against violence. It turns out that the billionaire's sister-in-law of Mitch McConnell, whose Tesla

00:02:26.900 tragically went in the lake and she was trapped and drowned. It turns out she was super drunk.

00:02:32.060 Huh. Well, I certainly didn't see that coming. Yeah, that's exactly how this happens, being super drunk.

00:02:44.560 However, in an irony, which should not be amusing in any way because it's all tragic, Tesla has released

00:02:53.180 their new self-driving software. It's the best version of self-driving software.

00:02:59.880 And apparently this one's a big one. Now, I don't know the details yet, but apparently this version

00:03:08.040 of the Tesla self-driving software should be really amazing. Now, I don't know if that gets you to the

00:03:16.320 point where a drunk driver could make it home or should, but are we at a inflection point where if

00:03:25.700 you are, if you know that you're somebody who's going to drink and drive, and most of us know that,

00:03:31.660 right? It doesn't sneak up on you. I don't think it sneaks up on you. I think people who know they

00:03:39.200 like to go out and have too many drinks and also drive home know exactly who they are.

00:03:44.280 Do you think that the world would be safer if such people could start their car and fall asleep and

00:03:51.600 the car just drives them home? Or is the self-driving car technology not quite good enough

00:04:00.280 that taking a sleeping drunk home is still a good idea? Well, we might be close to the, you know,

00:04:07.960 the, the past, what do you call it? The crossover point where the self-driving car is safer than

00:04:15.120 somebody trying to drive their own car after a couple of drinks. Now, I am here to tell you,

00:04:22.280 and I'm not going to name names. I do know an individual who has for a while now, uh, fallen asleep

00:04:31.420 and let her car drive her home. True story. I actually know somebody who falls asleep in their car

00:04:38.680 and lets the car drive home. And that's before this update. Now, I don't know how safe that is.

00:04:44.300 It doesn't sound as safe as it needs to be, in my opinion. But I can tell you there's at least one

00:04:50.720 person who shouldn't be, probably shouldn't be driving at all, who has found that the Tesla

00:04:56.280 keeps her alive. Now, uh, I'm hoping this new update really makes a difference and keeps people

00:05:04.300 safer. But in all seriousness, the entire world of, of drunk driving could be going away.

00:05:12.300 It could be the drunk driving just will be a weird thing of some people who just snuck up on them and

00:05:18.760 they didn't know they'd have a drink or something, but it could be the 80% of it just goes away in five

00:05:23.560 years because nobody has to drive home. Imagine if you didn't need to call anybody and you just

00:05:30.180 wander out and get in your car and it would just take you home all the way to your driveway.

00:05:36.660 I know I would buy alcohol, uh, stocks. Well, here's the beginning of my theme. I've got two themes

00:05:43.180 today. Seth McFarland, uh, the brilliant creator of the family guy and many talents, uh, great singer,

00:05:53.560 you know, he sings the classics. He's, uh, been involved in movies, both acting and writing and

00:05:59.700 directing and producing and stuff. Super, super talented guy. However, um, it's really hard to talk

00:06:08.320 to people who don't know anything that's happening in the real world. So here's something that Seth

00:06:15.520 said in a podcast. He was talking about how people like the New York times reporters, they're trained

00:06:22.620 in journalism. They went to college for it. You know, these are serious people working at a serious

00:06:27.080 platform. And, and Seth was bemoaning the fact that everyone thinks they're an expert now and all you

00:06:34.140 have to do is be a podcaster and you can be an independent journalist. And he, he worries that the

00:06:41.240 high ethical standard of reporting, which he was used to, may be eroded by all these new independent

00:06:48.180 voices. Now, what does that even sound like to your brain? For, for most of you who are watching

00:06:56.560 this, you're just going, well, what is that? Like a real human being with an actual opinion

00:07:02.460 who is smart and successful? How in the world could you have the impression that the news is still real?

00:07:08.720 Who has that? Who still has that opinion? That the news is still real? All right. So here's,

00:07:18.780 here's my first theme of the day.

00:07:23.780 All right. I'm just doing a little tweak here to see your comments.

00:07:29.500 Huh? It's going to, it's going to fight me today, but oh my God. The interface is just giving me all

00:07:37.600 because of random results. No. Really? It's not going to show me today's show. Is that really happening?

00:07:48.240 There we go. Huh?

00:07:53.360 All right. I have to solve this for my own benefit because I can't tell why the interface is giving me

00:07:58.000 two completely different results. So I can see the later show before the current show.

00:08:08.160 Oh, I put the wrong date on it. Did I put the wrong date on it? Is that what I did?

00:08:13.920 Did I date it the 18th instead of the 21st?

00:08:20.000 I can't see your comments because they're all dead. And so the locals interface is just fucking, 0.95

00:08:25.520 just garbage right now for, uh, I hate to say it because I own stock and rumble, but this just 0.96

00:08:31.840 doesn't work at all. All right. Let's see if I can, no, that is the pre-show. 0.92

00:08:39.760 Oh, it looks like I just put the wrong date on it. It's my date problem.

00:08:43.120 No, that's not working. So it shows me live. All right. Well, I have no, I put the wrong date on it.

00:08:58.000 Yeah. If you don't know, I have this, uh, date related problem, a calendar related problem.

00:09:05.600 So I actually, no, I can't fix it. It's just going to be what it's going to be. I can't fix it.

00:09:12.000 Once the feed starts, it's, it's basically, all right. So, well, I fucked that up today. Sorry,

00:09:19.200 locals. You won't see the show today because I put the wrong title on it. So you probably won't

00:09:23.440 know which ones to click on. That's on me. Sorry. Hope you can find it on another feed.

00:09:31.760 Anyway, um, Seth McFarland still thinks that, uh, the news is real. How could you have a conversation

00:09:39.040 with somebody about politics when they think the news is real? Have you noticed that that's like,

00:09:45.280 it's just impossible. Yeah. It's like just impossible. So,

00:09:51.360 um, Ireland's, uh, lost their freedom or they're well on the way to doing it. Uh,

00:09:59.280 the freedom of speech, Michael Schellenberger starts talking about this. So Ireland's, uh,

00:10:04.480 prime minister resigned, but they're still trying to get a law passed over there by the end of the year

00:10:10.240 in which, uh, if you say things online that the government doesn't like, they can come in your

00:10:15.440 house and take all your devices and put you in jail and look at all your messages.

00:10:21.440 So Ireland is right on the verge of in a democratic system ish. They're going to vote,

00:10:29.520 vote away their own rights. Apparently that's going to happen. They're going to vote away their own 0.90

00:10:34.880 right of free speech so that if you say something, the government doesn't like, they can come arrest you.

00:10:39.680 Now, as Schellenberger points out, this is probably a test case because if this works in Ireland,

00:10:47.520 you might see a lot more of it because certainly what we're seeing is whoever's in power seems to be,

00:10:53.280 um, turning off free speech because I think there is a fundamental problem with, uh, you can't have

00:11:01.520 the people who are in charge stay in charge as long as you have a free internet and people who can find

00:11:10.000 out things. So stability almost guarantee almost requires that the population doesn't know what's

00:11:17.200 going on. So the only way you can keep stability, be you a dictator or be you a fake republic like we

00:11:25.520 are. Um, the only way you can keep it stable is by not letting the public know what's going on.

00:11:31.840 Now, back in the sixties, the public watched the regular news, which we presume at this point was

00:11:37.760 all just, you know, all but managed by the CIA basically. So we thought we were watching real news,

00:11:44.560 but we were totally uninformed. You know, we thought a single shooter rogue person killed Kennedy.

00:11:51.680 Basically there's nothing that we believed that was true when I grew up, but we didn't know it.

00:11:57.280 Now we actually know it. So now we actually know it. What's going to happen now? Well,

00:12:03.120 the obvious only response to the fact that the public found a way to know what's true

00:12:08.240 is to shut down free speech. So if they can do it in Ireland and it sticks, you should expect that

00:12:14.560 that will happen in the United States and that people like me will be put in jail for saying fairly

00:12:20.720 ordinary things. Yeah. So I'm actually risking jail just by doing this. And now that would sound crazy

00:12:31.680 except that Peter Navarro is in jail. Trump is getting law fared. There are over a thousand

00:12:37.200 J sixers who are being, you know, uh, illegally put in jail, in my opinion, illegally. 1.00

00:12:42.560 So yes, the complete lack of freedom of speech is, uh, I think it's unstoppable. I don't think there's

00:12:52.960 any power that's big enough to stop free speech from completely going away. But if you want to feel

00:13:00.320 better about it, I don't think we ever really had it. We've never really had anything but the ability

00:13:08.240 to say what the government agreed with, right? What, you know, that, uh, whistleblower, the Boeing guy,

00:13:16.800 he had the freedom to say whistleblower things and that he was found dead in his car under suspicious

00:13:22.480 circumstances. And, you know, JFK, when he was president, he had the freedom of speech to say

00:13:30.640 whatever he wanted and his head was blown off in suspicious circumstances. So we've never probably,

00:13:37.280 probably never had free speech. We just, it wasn't as obvious. So it might not even be a change.

00:13:45.040 Well, and wokeness account, which is, uh, just a gem says that somebody called craft sports,

00:13:52.560 uh, they listed the job qualifications for a sports management associate.

00:13:56.960 And they said specifically that white people are not being considered.

00:14:03.200 You imagine that? Put it in writing. Because it's in writing.

00:14:08.400 Now they don't say white people are not, uh, considered. They say that they're looking for,

00:14:13.440 you know, people of color, which is the same thing. Now that could not be more illegal. 1.00

00:14:20.080 Do you think that Seth McFarlane thinks that, uh, DEI and, you know, the push for diversity,

00:14:28.000 do you think that he is aware that this is anything but good? Do you think that if you were Seth

00:14:36.800 McFarlane, do you would think that, uh, anyway, would you think that, uh, people actually could get

00:14:47.680 diversity without breaking the law? Here's a real basic test to see if somebody understands anything

00:14:54.560 about the world. Do you believe that all of the corporations in America, if they tried really hard,

00:15:02.640 could improve their diversity up to the level where it represents the population at large?

00:15:07.440 If someone says yes, if they try hard enough, then they don't really understand anything because

00:15:16.880 that's not true. The only thing that would happen is you would force companies to discriminate against

00:15:22.720 white people so they could hit their goal faster and they don't get fired themselves. So all the white 0.97

00:15:28.000 people would scramble to discriminate against white people who are trying to get jobs where they already

00:15:33.040 work. And that's the only thing that would happen every time. Now, if you didn't know that you wouldn't

00:15:40.560 understand anything about race relationship in the United States, would you agree? If you didn't

00:15:46.240 understand the basic math of the supply of adults who have all the right qualifications is too low

00:15:53.360 to improve your diversity without lowering your standards and that you'd have to lower your standards

00:15:58.880 quite a bit. If you didn't know that, how could you have a meaningful conversation about this topic?

00:16:05.920 Do you think Seth MacFarlane knows that? I don't know. Can't read his mind, but I doubt it.

00:16:14.480 So my advice for anybody who is working around craft sports, if you're a white guy, you should

00:16:22.000 stay away from that. So I wouldn't go anywhere near a company like that. In fact, if I were a white

00:16:26.640 person working at craft sports, I would be putting my resume out right away because they've already

00:16:32.560 signaled that you're not qualified for promotion because obviously they've got a DEI thing that

00:16:38.000 they're servicing. So if you're a white person working at craft sports, you should get the 0.97

00:16:42.560 fuck away from that company. That's my advice. Just get the fuck away because it's not a safe place 1.00

00:16:48.320 for you to be. And they've signaled that pretty clearly searchlight pictures presents the roses 0.99

00:16:54.240 only in theaters, August 29th from the director of meet the parents and the writer of poor things

00:16:59.760 comes the roses starring Academy Award winner, Olivia Coleman Academy Award nominee,

00:17:05.040 Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon, and Allison Janney, a hilarious new comedy

00:17:10.640 filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of hatred proving that marriage isn't always a bed of

00:17:16.400 roses. See the roses only in theaters, August 29th. Get tickets now. Well, let's talk about

00:17:24.640 batshit crazy women. This is my batshit crazy women report. I'm starting with a relationship expert 1.00

00:17:31.600 whose name doesn't matter. It's some blonde woman on social media who's telling you that everybody's 1.00

00:17:37.760 wrong and she knows what makes relationships work. And here's what she says. She's explaining why women 1.00

00:17:43.840 won't have sex with their husbands. Now, she tells us that she's got many qualifications in this exact 0.95

00:17:51.280 field, relationships and psychology. And she's had many, many thousands, I think, of clients. So she

00:17:59.360 really has her handle on this domain. And here's what she says. The reason that women don't want to 1.00

00:18:05.680 have sex with the husbands is that they don't feel safe. So there's something that the husband is

00:18:11.440 doing that makes them feel not safe. And when they don't feel safe, they don't feel attracted.

00:18:19.760 So that's batshit crazy. That sounds to me like somebody who doesn't know anything about anything.

00:18:26.320 I don't know how you could live in the real world and have that opinion.

00:18:32.640 Let me give it to you in, you know, full black bill. 0.65

00:18:39.040 If a man does everything a woman wants in a relationship, she loses respect for him and then 0.98

00:18:46.800 doesn't want to have sex with him. Would you agree? If he does everything she wants, like he's just a

00:18:52.880 vessel. You'd agree with that, right? And it's obvious. Everybody would agree with that. If he

00:18:58.240 does everything, he's just a simp. The woman loses respect for him, then loses sex field. 0.99

00:19:03.600 Right? So that's if he does everything she wants. Suppose the man doesn't do

00:19:09.200 a number of important things that the woman wants. What'd she do then? She shops for a better man who will 1.00

00:19:15.840 do the things that she wants. So women have two conditions and they're both failure conditions. 1.00

00:19:21.440 A man who does everything they want that's not attractive. A man who doesn't do what they want,

00:19:27.520 which makes them unhappy and look for a man who will. But such man doesn't exist,

00:19:32.160 except the one that they won't respect once he starts doing all the things.

00:19:37.040 So how in the world can you be a relationship expert and think that the reason that women 1.00

00:19:43.120 aren't having sex with their husbands is that they're not feeling safe? That is so far from any

00:19:48.320 reality which I've ever lived in. It's just the nature of relationships that if you put two people

00:19:56.080 together, you can measure the fallen chemistry that makes them attractive. You could just take any

00:20:03.120 two random people who are wildly attracted, put them together and make them married, make them live

00:20:08.400 the life of a married person where you're just pecking on each other and bothering each other about

00:20:12.720 what you're doing, you know, the normal thing. They will lose interest in each other. You don't need

00:20:18.080 any of this don't feel safe stuff. Ridiculous. So when I watch the, I'm really addicted to the 0.99

00:20:26.400 relationship advice on Instagram because it's almost universally terrible. It is, and they all have this

00:20:35.600 earnest, I figured it out voice. Does it bother you that the Instagram influencer experts, they all have

00:20:43.040 that same kind of similar, I'm an expert, I figured it out voice, and then you listen to them and it's like, 1.00

00:20:48.720 oh my God, you're stupid. Have you lived in the real world for a minute? All right, so that's story number 1.00

00:20:54.960 one, batshit crazy women. Batshit crazy women, story number two. The ex-wife of Jeff Bezos, who had many billions of 1.00

00:21:04.560 dollars because of the divorce, Mackenzie Scott Bezos has already donated over 17 billion dollars

00:21:11.040 to a whole bunch of causes, mostly racism-related causes. Now, do you think she made the world a 0.94

00:21:18.000 better place by giving to a whole bunch of probably Soros-related entities and taking the fruits of her 0.99

00:21:25.600 husband's good work and distributing them in the worst possible fucking way? As Ashley St. Clair said, 0.96

00:21:35.440 Mackenzie Scott Bezos is going to win the award for, quote, most danger done with charitable donations

00:21:41.120 ever. And then Ashley says, all because she really hates her ex-husband. Well, Elon Musk gave that a

00:21:48.880 little bullseye comment, so he agreed with it. I won't go so far as to say she hates her ex-husband.

00:21:56.160 That's a little mind-readery. I don't like to go as far as mind-reading. But does it seem that she's

00:22:03.840 doing something that seems closer to self-harm than trying to help? To me, it looks closer to self-harm

00:22:12.240 and taking the rest of us with her. So it looks like she has some guilt to work out, maybe. Can't 0.75

00:22:18.960 just spend her money and be happy about it. So we don't know what's going on in her mind, but the

00:22:25.360 giving away $17 billion in a way that I can guarantee she has not deeply researched could

00:22:32.000 be one of the worst things that's ever happened to America. Do you think she knows that? I doubt it.

00:22:38.080 Do you think if Seth MacFarlane found out she gave away $17 billion and she's on his team,

00:22:45.840 do you think he would regard that as, wow, that's good? My team, Democrat stuff, got lots more extra

00:22:52.520 money. That should be good. What do you think he thinks of that? Do you think he understands that

00:22:57.400 almost everything she gave money to, the primary category, was about race relations, which means 0.99

00:23:03.500 making it worse? Because that's what all the programs do at this point. No, probably doesn't know.

00:23:11.100 Batshit crazy woman, story number three, destroying the country. There's a Stanford professor named 0.99

00:23:22.140 something Bowler. Where's her name? It doesn't matter. But anyway, it's a batshit crazy white woman who's 1.00

00:23:32.060 been leading this big effort to lower the math standards in California. And the reason for 0.99

00:23:38.940 lowering the standards is to make it easier for people who are bad at math to do well in math,

00:23:45.740 meaning it's a diversity kind of a situation. Now, do you think that leading the charge to make

00:23:55.340 Californian children less good at math is based on her willingness and research and knowing that this

00:24:03.740 is good for the world? No, obviously, this is terrible. It's terrible for the world. You know,

00:24:09.900 even Bill Ackman, very Democrat, you know, he basically just did a head-shaking post. It's like,

00:24:16.140 what? What? I mean, obviously, this is a bad idea. Worst idea ever, to lower the math standards.

00:24:25.180 Now, something will probably happen with math education just because of AI. There'll be less

00:24:29.980 need for, you know, people to be trained up to be math teachers if you don't need any math teachers.

00:24:36.540 So something will happen in that pretty quickly. But at the moment, she stands accused of 52 instances

00:24:44.620 of having some entity she's involved with supporting research that is bullshit. 0.91

00:24:53.580 So some of the things that they believe their research or the research they have access to has 0.70

00:24:57.820 proven, the notions that taking time tests causes math anxiety, mixing students of different academic

00:25:04.460 levels, boosts achievement. Students have been found to perform better when teachers don't grade their work.

00:25:11.020 Are you kidding me?

00:25:19.900 I'm just looking at somebody's weird comments here.

00:25:26.140 Huh. All right. There's some other issues being worked out in the comments here on locals.

00:25:32.220 But I hope you're working it out, whatever that is.

00:25:36.620 So there's one woman who's trying to lower math 1.00

00:25:42.220 accomplishment in California for the benefit of those who are bad at math.

00:25:46.060 And how did she support her conclusions?

00:25:50.460 Some say with bad research, which is usually based on bad math.

00:25:55.180 So bad math is being used to come up with some bad math policies to make everybody bad at math.

00:26:01.980 And that's the sort of thing that a man doesn't do. No, I'm just kidding.

00:26:05.820 But my topic is bad shit, crazy women who are making the world worse. 1.00

00:26:10.460 Why would you do this? Like, what would even motivate you to want to work hard to make 1.00

00:26:15.980 math standards lower? Is anybody dumb enough to think that makes the world better? 0.97

00:26:23.500 Now, I do agree that there should be a high school path where you don't have to be good at math. 0.96

00:26:30.780 I'm very much on the page that not everybody should become a math teacher.

00:26:35.340 Right. There may be maybe 20 percent of students.

00:26:39.420 I don't know what the ratio is, but maybe 20 percent need to take math to a higher level

00:26:44.380 because they might use it someday. But 80 percent total waste of time.

00:26:48.860 So I kind of agree with at least a little bit of the thinking there that a lot of it's a waste of time

00:26:54.460 and it would just make minority students in some cases look like they're not achieving

00:27:00.780 when the thing they're not achieving is something they wouldn't use anyway.

00:27:04.780 So there's something to it. I just don't think it's being executed right.

00:27:11.020 Meanwhile, the Texas Permanent School Fund, I guess it's a big fund in Texas,

00:27:15.660 is taking the money away from Black Rock and State Street

00:27:19.180 because they've got these weird requirements for the companies that they invest in,

00:27:25.580 that they have climate policies that these guys like and racial equity audits and stuff like that. 0.94

00:27:34.540 And Texas says that's all bullshit and we're not going to give money to anybody who's involved with that stuff. 0.75

00:27:40.540 So Vivek is talking about this. 0.96

00:27:45.740 So this is good. So maybe Texas is setting a standard

00:27:50.060 by which it becomes hard for the bad guys to operate because they don't get as much funding.

00:27:57.020 Maybe. Well, here's the weirdest story.

00:28:00.380 If you're following the whole Julia Assange thing and for years,

00:28:03.820 the United States has been trying to extradite him over here

00:28:06.700 and people think he'll be killed when he gets here or put in jail forever.

00:28:12.220 But now there's talk and I don't know that this is true.

00:28:14.940 So this might be a this is an unreliable report, but there's a report that there's some effort

00:28:22.540 to to have him plead guilty to a misdemeanor and then be a free ban. 0.97

00:28:31.340 The misdemeanor would be mishandling classified information, which is completely bullshit. 0.99

00:28:36.940 He's just mishandling. But I guess that's what the misdemeanor plead downs are. 0.95

00:28:42.540 They're not based on reality. So let me ask the obvious question.

00:28:50.220 If this is being considered now, is it not because people think it makes sense?

00:28:57.260 And if it makes sense now, why didn't it always make sense?

00:29:00.940 Why didn't it always make sense to plead it down?

00:29:05.580 It just suddenly started making sense when nothing else changed.

00:29:08.540 Well, maybe what's changed is the election coming up.

00:29:13.580 Maybe what changed is because the Biden administration is locking up,

00:29:19.420 basically locking up journalists. They don't want one more high profile story

00:29:24.780 about the Biden administration wanting to take out a journalist.

00:29:28.700 So it could be about the election. But it also could be that they want to free him so they can

00:29:37.500 more easily kill him. It could be that what they really need to do is kill him and it's harder to 0.98

00:29:42.700 get to him in prison. Although Epstein suggests it's not impossible. 0.98

00:29:48.140 But the other possibility is that the CIA or somebody wants him free so that they can monitor him and

00:29:57.980 figure out who his network is and what they know. So they can take down the whole network.

00:30:04.060 That's possible. Yeah. So I don't believe anything about the story in terms of the stated intentions.

00:30:11.580 Because I definitely don't believe that they suddenly realized, hey, you know what would be

00:30:15.580 a good way to handle this thing? Why don't we just plead it down to a misdemeanor charge?

00:30:21.100 Now, nobody just came up with that idea suddenly. And then everybody said, oh, oh,

00:30:27.180 pleading to lower offenses. We'd never thought about that.

00:30:30.380 Now, obviously, there's some kind of scheme involved here. And I don't think it's good.

00:30:35.900 Do you think that there's a scheme involved that's good for Assange? No. Whatever this is,

00:30:43.020 is probably very bad for Assange. Probably. Don't know for sure. But all indications are

00:30:51.820 he's in more trouble, not less.

00:30:53.420 Well, Bill Malusian is reporting that 200,000 deportation cases were thrown out by immigration

00:31:05.340 judges since the start of the Biden administration. Here's the reason why. Because DHS didn't file the

00:31:11.660 required notice to appear in court in time. That's right. Your government didn't file the

00:31:18.060 right paperwork. So 200,000 people who were ready to be deported just won't be. Does that sound like

00:31:25.980 an accident or does that sound intentional? It's intentional, of course. Well, intentional in the

00:31:32.940 sense that nobody was trying too hard to make it not happen. Because they don't really care,

00:31:38.060 apparently. Apparently, there's more effort to bring people in than there is to stop people from coming in.

00:31:43.420 All right. Here's some new information about the 2020 election and the voting machines and the

00:31:53.740 tabulators. Now, I warn you before all these conversations on this topic that everything

00:32:03.660 that's claimed about voting machines and past elections, 95 to 100 percent of it will turn out to be false.

00:32:11.580 So this is in that domain. Doesn't mean it's false. Doesn't mean it's false. But if it's like everything

00:32:20.060 else in this domain, it will turn out to be when you find out more about it. So, you know, I'm over

00:32:26.860 the belief that all of our elections are rigged and have been for a long time. But that's different than

00:32:31.580 finding the evidence. I think it's sort of obvious we don't have real real elections and haven't for a long

00:32:37.020 time, you know, based on the weight of, you know, circumstantial evidence, which is abundant.

00:32:43.580 So I'll just tell you the story and then you can make your own judgments about the credibility of it.

00:32:48.460 This is from the Politics Brief publication.

00:32:50.860 So Kerry Lake and Mark Fincham, so these are two Republicans, they filed this Supreme Court appeal.

00:33:00.460 And here's what they're saying. There are major developments that would have to do with voting

00:33:06.860 machines and specifically Maricopa County, where things looked sketchy to many people.

00:33:12.300 So here's the claim that the voting machines cannot be deemed reliable and they don't meet the

00:33:20.620 constitutional and statutory mandates to guarantee a free and fair elections so that the machines are,

00:33:26.940 by their design, not capable of allowing the citizens to exercise their constitutional rights

00:33:33.900 because they can't be sure they voted or they can't be sure their vote was counted correctly and

00:33:39.500 tabulated correctly. Okay. There's new evidence. This shows that Maricopa County, they say, violated

00:33:47.820 state law for the electronic voting systems, including using altered software not certified for use.

00:33:57.980 So I think if I understand that story, there was testing done on some sample machines with a certain

00:34:05.580 set of software and then it was certified. And then after it was certified, they put in different software.

00:34:14.140 Does that sound okay to you? Now, it could be that in the world of software, you're always doing updates.

00:34:21.100 So it could have been the most innocent, normal, routine software update.

00:34:26.300 But you do have to recertify. If you put new software in it, you're going to have to test it to see if the new software

00:34:35.100 is a virus or intentionally rigged. And if you don't, can you say that it's certified and can you say that it's auditable?

00:34:43.260 And can you say that it was a good result? Well, it doesn't seem like it.

00:34:48.460 All right. There's more. The Dominion voting systems, they say, and these are systems used in almost 30 states,

00:34:58.300 have a built-in security breach, they claim, enabling malicious actors to take control of the elections.

00:35:05.740 Specifically, I think what that is, is the storing of the encryption keys and plain text,

00:35:12.780 meaning that all the secret stuff that is supposed to be hard to get to was not just hard to get to,

00:35:20.300 but it looked like it was intentionally made really, really easy to get to.

00:35:24.860 Now, we can't really say we know intention. We can only look at the design. But the design appears to be

00:35:31.820 more optimized toward giving away the data to a bad actor than it is to protect the data.

00:35:38.700 Because you would never put an encryption key in plain text behind nothing but a Windows sign in that

00:35:46.860 would give you access to changing the vote. All right. So that doesn't mean, you know, if this

00:35:55.260 allegations proves out that there really was text encryption keys that anybody could get to if they

00:36:02.940 could break through a minor Windows sign in problem, which is not the biggest problem to solve.

00:36:09.180 If that's true, it doesn't mean that the election was rigged. It just means you wouldn't know if it was fair.

00:36:17.340 All right. What else? They got these tabulator things, which are the tabulators are separate from the voting machines, right?

00:36:24.940 The tabulators are working on paper ballots. Do I have that right?

00:36:29.580 So there's tabulators in their voting machines, and it's good to keep them separate.

00:36:35.180 But speaking of ballot tabulation things, there was an extraordinary number of failures

00:36:42.060 at the 223 voting centers in Maricopa on election day. There were 181,000 errors.

00:36:48.300 A total of 138 of the 223 voting centers show a ballot insertion rejection rate of 20% or more.

00:36:58.940 20% or more of ballots inserted into the counter didn't work.

00:37:07.340 And I don't know if that means they just do it again or what.

00:37:10.060 And that rate is 100 times higher than the acceptable limit.

00:37:15.660 A hundred times over the limit for acceptable operation.

00:37:21.100 And acceptable in terms of the vote being reliable. All right.

00:37:30.380 And then there was the timing of ballot insertion errors across the county.

00:37:34.380 There were over 7,000 ballot insertion failures in almost every single 30 minute period for the entire election day.

00:37:44.140 So all day long, there were like 7,000 failures every half hour.

00:37:48.060 That's a lot. It's so many that it looks intentional.

00:37:53.900 One of the things that would happen if you've got a lot of failures, I don't know if it's just this issue,

00:37:59.820 but generally speaking, if you have a lot of failures on election day, it makes your lines very long.

00:38:07.900 It makes the lines long. And if you make the lines long in, let's say, red districts where there are a lot of Republicans,

00:38:14.920 that would suppress the vote because people will say, ah, I don't have enough time.

00:38:18.920 I got to get back to work.

00:38:21.000 And the claim is that most of these places that had accidental problems with their machines,

00:38:29.640 that they were red areas. And so it suppressed the Republican vote, allegedly, potentially.

00:38:36.280 Then you got your inconsistencies with the redacted cast votes, a whole bunch of centers had big problems with those.

00:38:46.760 You've got mismatched signatures. The projected number of mismatched signatures in 2022

00:38:55.320 was 127,000 out of the 1.3 million early votes. It's a lot.

00:39:01.720 So basically, the machines used, tabulators and voting machines, were either insufficiently secure, is the claim, the allegation,

00:39:13.240 and or intentionally crippled so that some groups would have suppressed voting.

00:39:19.160 And you also wouldn't know if there was any fakery going on because there were so many errors.

00:39:23.320 And basically, this is enough errors to hide any kind of election fraud.

00:39:29.880 Now, let me ask you this. I don't know how many of these will get any kind of attention in the courts

00:39:37.480 and how many of them have some innocent explanation that I'm just not aware of yet.

00:39:42.200 But do you think Seth MacFarlane has ever heard any of this?

00:39:46.040 Do you think Seth MacFarlane generally thinks the elections are pretty good?

00:39:50.360 Oh, sure. You know, every now and then, there'll be some local election where somebody's stuffed a ballot box.

00:39:55.720 But if you're talking about the presidential election, with all the people watching and years to make sure we have an auditable system,

00:40:03.640 how could that possibly be corrupt? If you didn't know anything, you would be like me a few years ago.

00:40:12.840 Me a few years ago was, well, I don't think the elections are rigged.

00:40:16.680 I mean, that's kind of a big claim. You better have good evidence if you say it's rigged.

00:40:22.680 And now I would say that the weight of evidence is overwhelming that we don't have an auditable system.

00:40:31.880 Would you agree with that?

00:40:34.200 Separate from the question of whether there was any past malfeasance, it's clearly not auditable.

00:40:41.160 And it clearly doesn't give us a result which is consistent with the will of the people,

00:40:46.040 because sometimes the people have to go home because the line is too long.

00:40:51.320 So there's a whole bunch happening that makes me think we don't have anything like any kind of election system in our fake democracy or fake republic.

00:41:02.360 Yeah. I don't know who's in control or what's going on beyond the scenes, but we definitely don't have a republic and we definitely don't have anything like a credible voting system.

00:41:14.200 Now, so let me say clearly, I'm not aware that any of the specific claims are true because I don't have the capability to know for sure.

00:41:23.640 So I don't want to say something about dominion that's unfair. I can just say these are the allegations.

00:41:32.680 And then on top of that, I can drop my own common sense, which says if you have a system that is so clearly not designed to know what happened, there's only one reason for that.

00:41:43.960 There's not two reasons for that.

00:41:45.720 There's only one reason you would spend a lot of money to put in a system that makes it impossible to know who won the election.

00:41:53.680 There's only one reason for that.

00:41:56.540 Now, again, something that Seth MacFarlane would have no idea.

00:42:02.000 So imagine being in a conversation with somebody who thought the news is real.

00:42:07.480 The elections are all auditable.

00:42:11.960 And that's the world we live in.

00:42:15.720 Nothing like that's happening.

00:42:18.140 Or imagine thinking that Ukraine is about keeping Russia and Putin from being aggressive.

00:42:28.240 I used to think that.

00:42:30.020 Now I embrace the Mike Benz frame that Ukraine was always just a big energy play. 0.98

00:42:37.640 And that it was basically our military intelligence people decided that there's a whole bunch of rich people they serve who would be way better off, maybe in the trillion dollar range better off, if we controlled Ukraine's massive energy and Putin did not.

00:42:56.060 And that that's what all Ukraine was about, the entire coup, all of it was about getting our rich American friends and other other countries, I suppose.

00:43:05.400 Getting them the major access to Ukraine's energy and cutting Putin out.

00:43:12.000 And then the whole story about Putin and NATO and all that was just a cover story for a money grab.

00:43:20.060 So you should see the Ukraine war as two bullies with gas stations having a fistfight and neither of them are credible or good people.

00:43:32.260 They're just two terrible people fighting it out with your money.

00:43:37.540 That's how I see it.

00:43:41.460 Anyway, so Trump is still trying to get the money to pay these bonds and these big fees, these unreasonable fees that he's been given by the corrupt prosecutors and AGs in different states.

00:43:55.480 And Caitlin Collins is reporting how, you know, the Republicans are getting nervous about whether he'll be able to find the money, he'd have to do a fire sale of his assets and, you know, so watching the TDS gooners just try to edge to Trump's troubles is the most disturbing thing you could possibly look at.

00:44:19.380 They're literally, and I do mean this literally, I think they're actually masturbating to how happy they are that something terrible might happen to Trump, which is a complete abrogation of all responsibility to our fellow citizens, as well as illegal as hell.

00:44:39.900 I mean, just super, super illegal.

00:44:42.340 How in the world is Letitia James still a free person? 1.00

00:44:46.440 Well, only if nothing is true.

00:44:47.980 Obviously, we don't have a Department of Justice that's working.

00:44:52.420 Just think of this situation.

00:44:54.980 So Soros' money makes the people in the country very divided on race, and they paint Republicans as white supremacists.

00:45:05.960 So that's what Soros' money does.

00:45:07.620 Secondly, he uses the money to hire the people who believe that story the most, which would be black women who become prosecutors and attorney generals. 1.00

00:45:19.200 So now he's got a group of people which he has brainwashed into thinking they live in a white supremacy, and they better get revenge on those bastards who made slaves of them, and they're still doing terrible things. 0.99

00:45:33.240 So now you've got this perfect situation where you've trained these hit people to go after Republicans, and then they do. 0.99

00:45:41.100 Now you've got Attorney General Letitia James, who said she ran for office saying she would target Trump without having a crime. 0.59

00:45:49.300 Without having a crime.

00:45:51.300 And she did.

00:45:53.300 And then she looked for something and found something that definitely wasn't a crime, and then turned it into one.

00:45:59.480 She said, oh, yeah, if you inflate your assets, and even though that's standard practice, and even though the bank doesn't even look at your inflated asset, and even though they checked themselves, and even though there was no victims, and even though the bank said, oh, yeah, we would work with them again.

00:46:13.840 And we made a lot of money, and we made a lot of money, and we made a lot of money, it was great.

00:46:15.920 And even with all that, he still gets charged.

00:46:20.980 And because the system is so broken and corrupt, he has to pay the penalty before he's finished his appeals.

00:46:28.700 Of course, the worst possible legal situation you could be.

00:46:32.080 That's not any kind of a justice system.

00:46:34.720 Now you say to yourself, well, Scott, Letitia James has violated at least two laws. 0.95

00:46:41.400 Number one, using the color of the office, I think it's called, you know, the, basically, if you're in an authority position, like a chief of police or something, you can't use your job to target people, and then use the, you know, the power of your job to take them out.

00:46:59.440 But she did exactly that, publicly and proudly, publicly and proudly, she broke the law by using her office to go after an individual for obvious political purposes, and for racist purposes. 1.00

00:47:14.140 Now, you might say to yourself, well, clearly, you know, there must be some way to, there's some check and balance here, right?

00:47:23.720 Nope.

00:47:25.500 What about the Eighth Amendment that says you can't do excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment?

00:47:31.120 Is it an excessive fine to take somebody's entire multi-billion dollar business away from them?

00:47:37.300 For a non-victim crime that nobody even complained about?

00:47:42.240 Yes, of course, it's amazingly excessive.

00:47:46.100 Like, impossible to even make an argument that's not anything but ridiculously excessive.

00:47:51.360 So, here she is, using her office to target a person and to deny that person their constitutional rights right in front of us. 1.00

00:48:01.480 There's no, you wouldn't have to do any research.

00:48:04.660 Just the public stuff is publicly a crime, and obviously so.

00:48:10.120 I mean, any reasonable person can see that this is just two horrible crimes right in front of you.

00:48:15.540 So, who exactly could do anything about it?

00:48:18.360 Well, who's her boss?

00:48:21.480 The governor?

00:48:23.080 Do you think the Democrat governor is going to do something to save Trump?

00:48:27.180 No, it's not really an option.

00:48:29.040 Do you think that one of the prosecutors on her own staff is going to say, you know what?

00:48:35.520 I'm going to buck the system, and I'm going to prosecute my own boss.

00:48:40.720 Do you think that would work?

00:48:42.400 Do you think that person's career would go well if they decided to prosecute their own boss?

00:48:46.900 Of course not. 0.87

00:48:47.740 So, the attorney general, funded by Soros, brainwashed by Soros, turned into a disgusting racist criminal, can now be a racist criminal in public, right in front of us, and there is no recourse, because everybody who could do something has also been brainwashed into thinking some version of, yeah, but Trump as president would be worse. 0.94

00:49:13.160 So, she actually can go on a reign of terror, and absolutely target people and take them out, and there's no recourse. 1.00

00:49:23.560 The governor will say, do you think that Seth MacFarlane is aware that the case against Trump is completely lawfare?

00:49:36.900 I doubt it.

00:49:38.900 I doubt it.

00:49:40.160 I don't think, if he thinks the news is real, then he probably thinks the case is real, too.

00:49:45.820 It's about as far from real as you can possibly get.

00:49:48.780 All right, here's what I've noticed is that the system protects itself, the system being all these bad things I'm talking about, from the politics being broken to the elections being broken to the Department of Justice being completely corrupt.

00:50:05.800 If you try to tell somebody, well, let me put it this way, if you start as a normie, a normal person, and you're not aware of all these things, you think the news is mostly real, especially your side, and you think the elections are mostly fair, and you think the Department of Justice is usually quite good, and that Ukraine is about Putin, and it's not about energy,

00:50:32.480 if you believe all of those things, and then you started looking into it and finding out more, do you know what happens to you?

00:50:43.140 It becomes impossible for you to have a conversation with normal people, right?

00:50:51.080 So if I told you what really is happening, you would say to me, and you had not begun the journey, like if you've also taken the journey, then we can talk,

00:51:00.940 because you would be aware that the JFK assassination, there's no chance that the way it was reported was real.

00:51:08.380 There's really no chance that it was that one gunman that killed them.

00:51:12.220 If you think there's any chance that that was real, how do I have a conversation with you about anything?

00:51:18.540 So what happens is, the more you learn about the corruption of the system, the more impossible it is to have any kind of a fruitful conversation with somebody who hasn't taken the journey.

00:51:31.980 And the people who haven't taken the journey have a name.

00:51:35.280 They're called Democrats.

00:51:37.120 There's an entire political party that hasn't taken the journey.

00:51:41.320 Now, Republicans are at all different levels.

00:51:43.460 You know, there are some Republicans who still think the election probably was mostly fair.

00:51:49.540 There are probably some Republicans who think, yeah, the news is largely correct.

00:51:55.600 No, no, it isn't largely correct.

00:51:58.780 It is fake by intention and design.

00:52:02.100 You couldn't be more wrong.

00:52:03.780 But if somebody is on the same level, you can have a useful conversation.

00:52:07.020 It's just there aren't many of them.

00:52:08.160 So I notice this because I've passed into what I call the crazy zone.

00:52:13.820 Meaning that if I were to talk to a normal person who believes the news is real and we live in a democratic, federal republic, none of that's true or even slightly true.

00:52:26.320 If they believe that, they think I'm crazy.

00:52:30.640 Right?

00:52:31.840 Would you agree?

00:52:32.480 If I simply explain to somebody like, let's say a Glenn Greenwald dump, let's say, imagine a Democrat who is walking through the world thinking all these things are real and true, spends 10 minutes with Glenn Greenwald, who I think most of you understand he would be one of the most credible people in the news sphere.

00:52:53.500 Would you agree?

00:52:54.720 Do you all agree with that?

00:52:55.540 That Greenwald would be one of the most insightful and credible, doesn't seem to be lying about anything as far as I can tell.

00:53:04.120 If you put him in a room with a typical Democrat and then come back in an hour, do you think that Greenwald would be able to break through and, you know, with his good powers of communication, convince them that they've been living in a complete fiction bubble their entire life?

00:53:23.180 Do you think he could do that?

00:53:25.540 I don't.

00:53:26.540 I don't think he could do it.

00:53:28.220 I think they would talk over him.

00:53:30.640 They would just talk over him.

00:53:32.400 Because it's so painful to find out you've been fooled your entire life that most people will just fight like, you know, wounded animals to not have to deal with the fact that everything they've believed is wrong.

00:53:44.460 And that would also mean that all of their votes were actually making the world worse.

00:53:49.140 Imagine finding out that every time you voted in the past, it was all making things worse.

00:53:58.700 All the work you did only made things worse.

00:54:01.420 You can't put that in your brain.

00:54:03.760 Your brain is going to go, nope, nope, nope.

00:54:05.520 I'm not that person.

00:54:06.640 I don't do things consistently wrong.

00:54:08.880 It must be something you're saying, Glenn Greenwald.

00:54:11.060 Imaginary Glenn Greenwald.

00:54:12.600 Must be wrong.

00:54:13.320 Now, imagine putting Mike Benz in that room.

00:54:17.840 If you're not following him, you have no idea what I'm talking about.

00:54:21.300 But Mike Benz, if you follow him on XBNZ, last name, you're going to see the entire description of the intelligent networks and how they essentially run the country, if not the world.

00:54:35.180 And you're going to see the real story.

00:54:38.400 And there is no way a normal Republican is going to hear what Mike Benz says.

00:54:43.960 And by the way, I think he only uses public sources.

00:54:48.040 I think he uses entirely things that you can go check yourself.

00:54:52.080 And you'd say, oh, yeah, I guess that is true.

00:54:54.860 None of it's even hidden.

00:54:56.120 All he does is put it together.

00:54:57.700 And when you put it together, it paints a picture that is really shocking if you haven't seen it yet.

00:55:03.700 So what would happen if you put him in a room with a normal Democrat like Seth MacFarlane?

00:55:11.660 Do you think Seth would leave that and say, whoa, almost everything I believed about the country is completely wrong?

00:55:19.400 I don't think so. 0.87

00:55:22.260 I think that what would happen is they'd say, I met a crazy guy.

00:55:26.560 I don't know who he's working for, but probably China.

00:55:29.380 That's what they would do.

00:55:30.340 So we have a situation where we can no longer even have a conversation because we're not even talking about policies.

00:55:41.040 Imagine thinking that the political conversation is about policies.

00:55:46.720 I don't know when that stopped, but it's definitely not about policies.

00:55:51.300 If you look at the border situation, do you think that the border is open because we haven't decided a good policy?

00:55:57.840 No, no, the border is open because there's somebody who has power who wants it open.

00:56:05.000 I think it's obvious that we're working with the cartels in all the Central and South American countries where they exist.

00:56:13.140 I think we partner with the cartels because that's how we control those other countries for military and energy reasons and business reasons, basically.

00:56:22.340 And the trade-off is that our people are allowing the fentanyl trade and the immigration and human trafficking, and that they know they're doing it.

00:56:33.860 It's intentional.

00:56:34.940 It's by design.

00:56:35.840 And it's what we're paying the cartels.

00:56:38.980 Basically, we're paying off the cartels by letting them earn so that when we need them to, let's say, nudge the government of some place to be good to some American interest, that we have the ability to nudge because we're productive partners with the cartels.

00:56:55.120 Imagine telling that story to a normal person.

00:57:02.540 I think most of you are not normal because you're listening to this.

00:57:06.700 So what we have instead of people who know what's happening on is people who are Democrats who are literally so happy that something bad might happen to Trump that they can't get enough dopamine watching it happen.

00:57:21.740 They're actually finding joy in watching the system grind down the biggest enemy to the system.

00:57:27.000 And so I will further this point by saying that the key to Democrats holding power is not letting Democrat voters have access to people like me.

00:57:42.420 I'll just let you sit with that statement for a while because it's so egotistical, but then I'll soften it later.

00:57:50.420 This is one of my tricks where I get you all worked up before I soften it.

00:57:55.420 So to get you all worked up, I'll say, I'm so powerful that the Democrats need to keep their base away from listening to me.

00:58:05.660 Okay, now I'll soften a little bit.

00:58:07.300 Not just me, but also Glenn Greenwald, Mike Benz, Jack Posabek, Mike Cernovich, Michael Schellenberger, Matt Taibbi, right?

00:58:20.260 So it's a fairly long list, but the Democrat strategy has to be to make sure that their base never hears from any of us.

00:58:29.340 Now, they've done a good job on me, and I don't know exactly how they did it.

00:58:34.840 So I don't think it's just because I got canceled, but I do not have really contact with actual normal Democrats.

00:58:43.160 The only ones I see are obviously paid or by hobby.

00:58:48.660 They want to be trolls.

00:58:49.980 So the only Democrats I get are the ones who come in, no matter what I say, no matter how valid, no matter how well expressed,

00:58:57.380 they come into my comments and they say, well, why are we listening to somebody who threw away everything as a disgraced cartoonist?

00:59:04.280 So the main thing they want to do is make sure that nobody on their team hears anything I say.

00:59:14.020 Now, I've also heard that there's a over a million person list, a block list, and I don't know how you access it,

00:59:21.620 but apparently you can block all the other people who are blocked by somebody else on some list.

00:59:28.260 Is that a thing?

00:59:28.980 That's a real thing, right?

00:59:30.560 I don't know how you do that, but I'm told it's a thing.

00:59:34.380 So it might be that the Democrats have figured out how to game the X platform by, you know,

00:59:41.160 we're all over on the X platform thinking we got our free speech back.

00:59:44.880 It's like, yeah, you know, Elon's fighting for us and got our free speech back, but at least on X we have free speech.

00:59:51.380 No, you don't.

00:59:52.560 All the Democrats did is they figured out a way to make Democrats not see your free speech. 1.00

00:59:57.260 So you have the freedom to talk to your fucking self. 1.00

01:00:00.500 Yeah, you have the fucking freedom to talk to yourself. 1.00

01:00:03.640 And if you talk out loud, you have the freedom to say stuff that don't annoy anybody in power because they will find a way to put you in fucking jail. 1.00

01:00:11.300 That's the system. 0.98

01:00:13.000 Do you think Seth MacFarlane knows that?

01:00:15.800 No.

01:00:16.160 Because he's never going to sit in a room with me.

01:00:19.760 He's never going to sit in a room with Mike Benz.

01:00:22.480 Never going to sit in a room with Glenn Greenwald or Michael Schellenberger or Matt Taibbi.

01:00:28.340 Never.

01:00:29.460 So there's no way he'll ever know.

01:00:31.500 Do you think he'll see this?

01:00:33.620 Imagine if you will, that, well, we'll turn it around.

01:00:37.820 Let's say there's somebody, a notable person who does an extended podcast in which I'm mentioned 25 times.

01:00:45.860 Do you think somebody would mention it to me?

01:00:47.800 Of course.

01:00:48.920 It would take about five seconds before somebody would send me the link and they'd say, hey, this person said a bunch of things about you.

01:00:55.900 It happens every day.

01:00:57.360 Literally every day, somebody sends me a link and says, hey, somebody talked about you.

01:01:00.900 Do you think he gets those links?

01:01:04.540 Bet not.

01:01:06.600 I'll bet he'll never see this.

01:01:09.360 Because nobody will, well, and even if somebody sent him a link, what would he likely say? 0.87

01:01:14.480 Why would I listen to a disgraced racist?

01:01:19.200 Why would he spend the time? 0.99

01:01:21.020 It would be crazy.

01:01:21.700 And if he did listen to it, without having the priming of all the background and context that most of you have, it would sound crazy.

01:01:32.040 I would sound crazy right now for just saying what I've already said on this podcast.

01:01:38.980 Right?

01:01:39.840 Would you agree that I would sound crazy to someone who didn't have any background on what's going on?

01:01:45.340 Yeah.

01:01:45.820 So, probably the only reason I'm still alive is that I've been completely marginalized to talking to people who already agree with me.

01:01:54.100 That could be it.

01:01:57.700 So, we're all waiting for the black swan event.

01:02:00.300 I saw a number of people have mentioned it now online.

01:02:03.500 So, now that we see the gears of the machine and we know that one of the mechanisms of control is ginning up fake emergencies that will give the people in power more power.

01:02:16.720 So, we're all expecting a big one to happen between now and election day.

01:02:21.340 Well, here's the thing.

01:02:22.660 Do you think they manufacture black swan events?

01:02:26.620 Or do they just wait for one to happen because there's always one coming along?

01:02:31.180 And then they just capitalize on it.

01:02:33.600 Because if you think, let's say, George Floyd was a black swan event, I say, no, it wasn't.

01:02:40.440 It was an op.

01:02:41.100 It was an ordinary event, tragic, but unfortunately ordinary that somebody died of an overdose.

01:02:49.140 But then it got turned into, by the fake media, into he was murdered.

01:02:53.220 Do you think that Seth MacFarlane knows that the whole George Floyd thing was fake and that he just died of an overdose and the news and the coroner were pressured and basically it was just a white guy got put in jail for, maybe he didn't do a perfect job, but he certainly didn't kill him.

01:03:14.160 So, yeah.

01:03:15.160 If a Democrat heard me say that, which apparently they never will, I'm totally walled off on them.

01:03:24.540 If they heard me say that the George Floyd thing is obviously and clearly, and every Republican knows it, was the most gross violation of justice I think I've ever seen in my adult life.

01:03:42.320 I don't know.

01:03:42.700 It's hard to think of a worse situation than watching somebody not murder somebody and then they go to jail for it.

01:03:49.400 So, that's what I watched.

01:03:51.920 I watched somebody not murder somebody and then go to jail for murder.

01:03:55.980 And I think a lot of you thought the same thing.

01:03:59.140 Now, at the time, I didn't say a lot about it because it was too dangerous.

01:04:02.880 But now I'm completely walled off from all trolls.

01:04:07.040 So, they'll never see it anyway.

01:04:09.040 So, I can just say it out loud.

01:04:10.800 Plus, I'm canceled so I can say anything I want.

01:04:12.760 Well, Rasmussen did a poll on Biden policies.

01:04:19.360 49% of likely U.S. voters say that Biden's policies have hurt them.

01:04:24.720 So, basically, half of the country that votes think Biden's policies have hurt them.

01:04:30.140 Well, how many would say the same about Trump?

01:04:31.760 Let's say 34% say Trump's policies hurt them compared to 49%.

01:04:43.320 So, big, big difference.

01:04:45.400 And people trust Trump more than Biden on economics.

01:04:48.840 In a normal world, would you say, well, it's pretty obvious what's going to happen here.

01:04:54.780 We've got one person who's just way better on immigration and economics.

01:04:59.080 And that seemed to be our biggest issue.

01:05:01.620 So, obviously, the one who's way ahead on economics is going to win. 1.00

01:05:05.240 Because, as we learned in the Bill Clinton campaign, it's about the economy, stupid. 0.99

01:05:10.900 Well, I don't think those rules apply anymore. 0.99

01:05:13.220 I think the new rules are that whoever is really in charge of our country can make anybody the president they want.

01:05:20.760 And if something goes wrong, they can blow his head off in a convertible in Texas.

01:05:29.080 That's what I think. 0.98

01:05:32.620 All right.

01:05:36.720 So, here's some more news.

01:05:41.200 So, End Wokeness, again, has reported that Google changed their search results for the definition of the word bloodbath.

01:05:51.880 Now, there was a time when I would have automatically said, that didn't happen.

01:05:58.360 They didn't just, like, right in front of you change the definition of a word to match the Democrat spin.

01:06:05.700 But he's got screenshots.

01:06:09.640 He's got a screenshot from before the whole bloodbath thing.

01:06:14.140 And one of the definitions was very clearly, a bloodbath could also refer, besides the, you know, human violence part, can also refer to an economic loss.

01:06:25.640 That could be a bloodbath.

01:06:27.340 It said it explicitly.

01:06:28.320 Basically, one of the definitions is an economic bad outcome.

01:06:35.020 And as of today, they got rid of that part of the definition.

01:06:39.460 And now it just says it's physical violence.

01:06:43.700 Did that really happen right in front of us?

01:06:45.680 Like, I'm having trouble believing that it's not just something, an oddity of how you search.

01:06:54.060 And maybe it's, you know, one person got the...

01:06:57.240 I'm having trouble believing this one.

01:06:59.580 On the other hand, it is now well within the realm of things we've already seen happen.

01:07:06.720 Would you agree?

01:07:07.420 If you had asked me in the year 2000, did Google just go on and change the definition of a word so that the Democrats' narrative, which is completely made up, would be more supported?

01:07:22.220 I would have said in 2020 or 2000, let's say, I would have said, well, I don't think they'd do that right in front of the world because we could see it.

01:07:31.040 And people would call them out and then they would, you know, be embarrassed and it'd be bad for them.

01:07:35.460 But we don't live in that world anymore.

01:07:38.220 We live in the world where they can do it right in front of you.

01:07:41.820 And there's nothing you can do.

01:07:44.200 Because again, the only people are going to hear about it are the people in my bubble with me, like you.

01:07:52.320 You're in my bubble if you're watching this.

01:07:54.500 Or we can say it's your bubble and I'm in your bubble if you like it that way.

01:07:59.620 But no, I think this actually is happening.

01:08:02.520 You know, I wouldn't bet my life on it.

01:08:03.920 I think it's a 60-40 situation.

01:08:06.060 It might be something else we find out about it.

01:08:08.360 But at the moment, it looks like the system is so corrupt that they changed the definition of a word right in front of you.

01:08:18.260 Now, I was saying before we went live, I was talking to the locals people privately.

01:08:23.820 And I was saying that for my entire life, people have been saying, oh, it's like 1984 now in the 70s.

01:08:32.560 And I'd say, oh, is it?

01:08:35.660 Is it really?

01:08:37.020 And then, you know, 10 years go past and they're like, well, now it's 1984.

01:08:40.960 We're definitely 1984 now.

01:08:43.520 And I would say, but are we?

01:08:46.160 You know, you said that 10 years ago.

01:08:47.720 But now I have to agree.

01:08:51.180 If you're actually watching words change their definition in real time to match the bad things that Democrats want to do to the other side, if that's really happening, and it does look like it is, I could be wrong.

01:09:05.480 So I'm not going to say 100% on this one.

01:09:08.440 But if it is, yeah, we're in 1984.

01:09:12.480 I think this is when you could call it.

01:09:15.120 You could say it's been creeping up on us for a long time.

01:09:18.060 But yeah, yeah.

01:09:20.340 If they're changing the definition of words in real time, that would answer all of your questions about what kind of a system we're in.

01:09:27.700 Now, do you think that Seth MacFarlane will ever hear that the bloodbath thing was taken out of context?

01:09:36.280 I doubt it.

01:09:37.520 And will he ever hear that Google changed the definition of it allegedly?

01:09:43.440 Probably not.

01:09:45.260 No.

01:09:45.920 There's no who would tell him.

01:09:47.620 Because if you're not watching this podcast or following the same people I follow on X, and I know they're not, how would you know?

01:09:55.400 Is it going to be on CNN?

01:09:57.700 Do you think CNN will report that Google changed the definition of the word?

01:10:02.140 If it happened.

01:10:04.240 All right.

01:10:04.680 I'm seeing something that might be an answer to that.

01:10:08.240 Oh.

01:10:09.100 Let me read the famous George Orwell 1984 quote.

01:10:13.100 Somebody put it in the comments.

01:10:15.540 So this is from 1984.

01:10:17.420 Quote, every record has been destroyed or falsified.

01:10:20.380 Every book rewritten.

01:10:21.400 Every picture has been repainted.

01:10:22.960 Every statue in street building has been renamed.

01:10:25.040 Every day has been altered, and the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute.

01:10:31.000 History has stopped.

01:10:32.560 Nothing exists except an endless present in which the party is always right.

01:10:37.260 Does that describe our current situation?

01:10:41.320 To a T.

01:10:41.860 We're actually watching history rewritten in real time.

01:10:50.500 History is being erased.

01:10:52.220 You know, I've talked about this before, but the history of me, you know, the public record of me and who I am and what I've done, it's all changed.

01:11:00.300 And it's all fake.

01:11:04.020 My books have been erased.

01:11:06.840 Any good work I've ever done, completely gone.

01:11:10.260 And now I'm watching my greatest contributions to really the most important things I've ever done are now routinely being credited to other people, which is weird watching it happen in real time.

01:11:24.920 And routinely, just other people are being credited with things I literally invented that changed a lot.

01:11:33.460 All right.

01:11:36.720 Let's see what else we got going on here.

01:11:39.000 How many of you saw the Bobulinski thing?

01:11:41.400 I'm still shaking my head because it was so amazing.

01:11:44.940 So here's how to understand that.

01:11:46.760 So Bobulinski was Hunter Biden's business partner, and he testified in the impeachment trial, I guess it was, to the House Oversight Committee.

01:11:55.100 And the Democrats had to shut him down as best they could, and they succeeded.

01:12:01.740 So the bad news is that Bobulinski said things that made it very clear that the Biden family was a criminal influence organization.

01:12:13.400 They were taking money from somebody they knew to be President Xi's protege.

01:12:21.220 Like, they knew that.

01:12:23.040 And they still were going to do, like, millions of dollars of business, which would have, you know, made them beholden to Xi indirectly.

01:12:28.940 And then the whole thing in Ukraine, we now understand it was just an energy grab by our intel and military people and NATO.

01:12:39.700 And people were going to make a zillion dollars on it, and the Bidens were part of that.

01:12:44.500 And so certainly it looks like a FARA violations.

01:12:48.880 It looks like a RICO, meaning that they were, a lot of people were coordinating for criminal intent.

01:12:54.980 Which is what AOC calls no evidence of a crime.

01:13:00.140 So she kept saying to Bobulinski and over-talking him, did you personally see Joe Biden commit a crime? 0.98

01:13:07.960 Now, you have to see her liar eyes. 0.99

01:13:10.680 She does liar eyes, you know, more obviously than most people. 0.97

01:13:14.460 So look for the wrinkled forehead and the eyebrows that are practically up to your hairline. 0.81

01:13:20.040 And when you say things you know are not true, so when she's saying, so, you're saying there's no crime.

01:13:29.000 And then Bobulinski would say, yes, there's a crime.

01:13:32.120 There's FARA, there's RICO.

01:13:33.680 So, you didn't see any crimes.

01:13:38.060 Yeah, yes, I did.

01:13:39.140 So the FARA, so the RICO.

01:13:41.180 So, you're saying you didn't see any crimes. 1.00

01:13:44.600 And her eyes just get wider and wider as the things she's saying are stupider and stupider. 1.00

01:13:50.860 Because the wide eyes are how you signal you want somebody to believe your bullshit. 1.00

01:13:57.560 When you know what you're saying is true, you don't do that wide eye thing. 0.99

01:14:03.420 Here's how you say things you think are reasonable and normal and true.

01:14:07.540 So, Mr. Bobulinski, you've made a lot of claims, but did you directly witness any crimes?

01:14:16.800 That would be somebody who thinks they have a good point and that the information alone would tell the story they want to be told.

01:14:24.580 If they know the information is not telling the story they want to be told, they talk over you and they open your eyes so they're like these giant saucers.

01:14:32.140 And they pretend that you didn't say what you just said.

01:14:37.420 Mr. Bobulinski, what color is the sky during the daytime when there are no clouds?

01:14:43.800 That would be blue.

01:14:45.600 Why do you say the sky is purple?

01:14:48.720 Well, no, I said the sky is blue.

01:14:50.420 Why do you continue to say it's purple?

01:14:53.740 Well, no, I didn't say that.

01:14:55.220 I was just saying blue.

01:14:56.480 Why?

01:14:57.180 Why?

01:14:57.700 Why?

01:14:58.640 Give me one reason why you keep lying.

01:15:00.520 And then the people who don't know the situation, which is almost everybody, because it's too complicated, are going to look at that and they're going to say, well, the only thing I remember is that AOC said there was no evidence of any crime.

01:15:16.600 So I guess the Bidens are fine.

01:15:21.040 Do you think that Seth MacFarlane took any time to watch the Bobulinski stuff?

01:15:27.120 No.

01:15:28.320 No.

01:15:28.680 Why would he?

01:15:29.380 It's too complicated.

01:15:30.240 It's too wonky.

01:15:31.280 You feel like you've already seen it before, et cetera.

01:15:37.240 Seeing some more definitions.

01:15:39.120 So did other sources also change the definition?

01:15:44.420 All right.

01:15:45.000 So some have it right.

01:15:46.780 Some have it wrong.

01:15:47.760 The bloodbath definition.

01:15:50.240 All right.

01:15:50.640 So I would say Judge Jeanine, I thought, had the best filter on this.

01:15:55.800 It is true.

01:15:57.480 And AOC was very clever to do it.

01:15:59.340 She's a clever persuader. 1.00

01:16:01.240 She knew that if she just yelled, but you didn't personally see a crime, and she said it enough that her idiot followers would think that's what happened. 1.00

01:16:10.920 However, as Judge Jeanine says, this would be sort of a circumstantial case, meaning that if you put everything we know in one argument, well, it's obvious a criminal organization. 0.99

01:16:26.360 It's obvious, obvious, super, super obvious that it's an illegitimate, skeezy operation.

01:16:35.800 And that they were way too close to people who could have influenced them, like China's President Xi and all that badness in Ukraine.

01:16:44.040 And as long as the Democrats don't understand all of the details of the allegations, and they don't, because they're not going to watch Bobulinski, then they can say, well, I haven't heard anything that sounds bad to me.

01:16:59.240 So, AOC is part of the turd caucus.

01:17:05.140 The turd caucus are the people who will say absolutely anything in public, because they know you won't check.

01:17:11.140 So, that would be Schiff, Swalwell, you know, Brennan Clapper, J.B. Raskin.

01:17:19.780 So, there's this group of maybe a dozen people that, as soon as you see them, you know that they don't have an argument, so they're sending out the turd caucus to lie to you to your face.

01:17:31.400 And they're just hoping that you don't check on anything.

01:17:33.940 All right, we're going to tell a bunch of lies.

01:17:36.040 I hope you don't check anything.

01:17:37.280 So, the thing that they should be looking at is to see whether there's a pattern and a set of facts which would clearly show that the Biden crime family was doing stuff and kicking back money to Joe and that they were pretty close to power in other countries in a way that is uncomfortable.

01:17:59.320 Anyway, Kyle Becker finally snapped.

01:18:03.960 I shouldn't say that, because Kyle's a great follow, speaking of independent journalist types.

01:18:11.420 So, follow Kyle Becker, he's great.

01:18:13.920 Anyway, he posted today, I don't feel like the United States has a government anymore. 0.70

01:18:18.780 It's just a criminal organization looting taxpayers for trillions, greenlighting an illegal alien invasion, and acting as accomplices to foreign subversion by the communist Chinese. 0.98

01:18:30.020 That's pretty close.

01:18:32.500 What do you think?

01:18:33.960 Yeah, Goldman's another part of the third caucus.

01:18:37.100 But I think that's a pretty good summation.

01:18:39.900 I do think that we have a, that the government is more of a criminal organization.

01:18:45.580 I think that's, I think that's just so obvious now that you can say that.

01:18:51.580 And meanwhile, the U.S. is calling on the U.S. Security Council, the U.N. Security Council for a ceasefire in Gaza.

01:18:58.080 You think that's going to happen?

01:18:59.000 You think there's going to be a ceasefire in Gaza because the U.N. Security Council called for one?

01:19:04.280 Nope.

01:19:05.320 I don't think so.

01:19:07.640 I think Israel is going to do what Israel is going to do. 1.00

01:19:10.120 Now, in my opinion, as I've said before, one of the greatest assets that Israel has had since its founding is the narrative of the Holocaust. 0.96

01:19:22.260 Because once you have the Holocaust narrative working in your favor, people don't want to do it to you again.

01:19:29.880 And, you know, it's a very, it puts up guardrails, you know, for behavior that makes sense.

01:19:36.360 However, if you spend that goodwill, let's call it goodwill in a weird way, the idea that the Holocaust narrative should influence all of us, you know, not just people who had some direct connection to it.

01:19:52.020 And I think that has always been a good benefit to Israel because nobody wants to see the Holocaust happen again. 0.99

01:19:59.560 So if it looks like Israel is threatened, there are a lot of people who are automatically primed to say, no, never again.

01:20:05.460 We can't let the Holocaust happen. 0.97

01:20:06.700 So that's always been one of Israel's greatest assets.

01:20:11.000 And I think that they've used it wisely.

01:20:15.000 But now it looks like Netanyahu is going to spend that savings account, meaning that when this is all said and done, and again, if you think you're seeing my opinion in this, I'm trying to leave my opinion out.

01:20:31.280 I'm just going to describe it.

01:20:32.760 And I'm trying to do it just, you know, without any bias.

01:20:38.700 The Holocaust narrative, I think, will be completely destroyed by whatever happens in Gaza. 0.78

01:20:45.700 And I think they've already crossed that point where I don't think the Holocaust narrative will ever be operative the way it used to be.

01:20:55.940 Because I think forevermore, every time it comes up, somebody is going to say, well, what about Gaza?

01:21:02.760 Now, I'm not telling you that's a good or bad comparison.

01:21:07.180 There's no opinion in what I'm saying.

01:21:09.380 I'm just describing what is the likely outcome.

01:21:12.960 But here's the surprise switch.

01:21:18.340 It sounded like I was kind of criticizing Netanyahu, didn't it?

01:21:22.020 Because I said he was just spending their greatest asset.

01:21:29.240 But you know what?

01:21:31.720 Here's the thing that's hard to predict.

01:21:34.660 This looks like a good investment to me.

01:21:37.520 And again, that's not an opinion or a value judgment.

01:21:41.340 Just cold, clear cash.

01:21:44.880 If you had the Holocaust narrative in your pocket and it was your asset and you saw that you could once and for all, maybe, remove your biggest risk in the area through somewhat dramatic actions, that might be a good expense. 0.94

01:22:00.780 Trading the Holocaust narrative and its protective qualities might be a good trade-off if what you get is no neighbors that want to kill you every minute of the day. 0.55

01:22:14.940 That might actually be worth the expense. 0.99

01:22:17.240 And I think Netanyahu is smart enough to know that it looks like a good investment, but he's going to have to eat worldwide shit forever. 0.99

01:22:30.480 Netanyahu will never recover from the Gaza situation. 0.99

01:22:36.400 I think he basically just tied himself.

01:22:38.800 I'm not going to give you.

01:22:40.080 I was going to make a Christian analogy, but let me back off on that one.

01:22:45.420 I think that Netanyahu is literally sacrificing his reputation and if not his life.

01:22:53.500 At the same time, he's spending the Holocaust narrative, the biggest asset, and it is one hell of a big swing.

01:23:02.340 Because if in the long run this works out, meaning that Israel has all this extra land that they've dominated, their neighbors are no longer trying to kill them.

01:23:13.740 They have a much bigger territory and therefore bigger economy and they're safer.

01:23:19.500 He's going to look like a genius.

01:23:21.180 But at the moment, it's hard for any civilized person to back him.

01:23:28.020 Because if you see what's happening in Gaza, you don't really want to say, well, I back that guy that's doing that. 0.99

01:23:35.580 Because you didn't back the Holocaust. 0.95

01:23:37.440 You don't back anything that involves lots of people getting killed.

01:23:40.860 I mean, it's just hard to be a good person and back any kind of military action against people who many of them are civilians.

01:23:48.000 So you can hate the evil and badness of it while still saying, okay, but is it a good play?

01:23:59.000 Will history judge Netanyahu to be one of the greatest leaders or one of the worst?

01:24:05.760 I guarantee he will be judged one of the worst for years to come.

01:24:12.040 Because it'll be like Gaza will be the stain that can't be removed. 1.00

01:24:17.080 But when he's dead, and maybe it's 30 years from now, people are going to look back with a different filter and they're going to say, maybe.

01:24:26.600 This would be the optimistic case.

01:24:28.520 Maybe.

01:24:28.760 They might say, you know, I didn't like any of that stuff.

01:24:33.060 I definitely didn't like Gaza went. 0.94

01:24:35.320 No good person could be in favor of massive death.

01:24:39.560 But it looks like it worked out.

01:24:43.160 That's a possibility.

01:24:45.020 And it's a strong one.

01:24:47.260 So the thing you shouldn't do is believe that Netanyahu doesn't know how anything works.

01:24:53.940 Netanyahu knows how everything works.

01:24:58.400 And so he's making a play that on paper looks like it could be one of the greatest plays that Israel's ever done to their future security and, you know, the future of the country. 0.79

01:25:10.660 But it's very risky.

01:25:12.580 It's very risky.

01:25:13.880 And they could lose their greatest asset and still end up with dangerous neighbors.

01:25:19.160 So it's by no means safe.

01:25:22.340 But boy, is it gutsy.

01:25:24.940 And honestly, I'd probably play it the same way.

01:25:30.060 You know, I always try to put myself in this situation, which is hard to do, you know, because you can't really put yourself in other people's situation.

01:25:38.980 But you can get closer if you at least spend some time thinking about what that would be like.

01:25:44.740 And I think he's taking a hell of a patriotic risk personally.

01:25:54.080 So I could be wrong.

01:25:56.120 I'm not there.

01:25:57.100 I don't know the people personally.

01:25:58.500 So I could be wrong about everything.

01:26:01.120 All right.

01:26:02.560 Yes, we all agree that Israel is in a self-defensive frame.

01:26:13.200 Did he forget?

01:26:15.740 Cortez.

01:26:16.680 What's that?

01:26:20.100 All right.

01:26:20.960 Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the best show ever.

01:26:28.100 All right.

01:26:32.180 Biden cancels $6 billion in student loan debt.

01:26:36.980 Interesting.

01:26:37.760 I'll check up on that story.

01:26:39.120 What's the difference between an opinion and a prediction?

01:26:45.580 Hmm.

01:26:46.500 What is the difference between an opinion and a prediction?

01:26:49.220 Well, the opinion usually has value judgments.

01:26:51.660 A prediction doesn't necessarily have value, right?

01:26:56.660 So an opinion might be, I don't think Israel should do what they're doing.

01:27:02.460 But a prediction would be, they're going to keep doing what they're doing.

01:27:05.700 Does that work as a difference between an opinion and a prediction?

01:27:12.480 So you could argue that I have an opinion about my prediction, but that gets a little wordy.

01:27:17.920 All right.

01:27:20.120 Thanks for joining, everybody.

01:27:22.360 Locals, people, I'm going to see you after I cut off this. 1.00

01:27:25.560 I'll open up a new feed for the after show discussion.

01:27:28.640 Thanks for joining here on YouTube and Rumble.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 21, 2024

Episode 2420 CWSA 03⧸21⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript