Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 25, 2024


Episode 2424 CWSA 03⧸25⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 23 minutes

Words per Minute

145.45758

Word Count

12,186

Sentence Count

828

Misogynist Sentences

31

Hate Speech Sentences

61


Summary

In this episode: Elon Musk thinks we need a red wave to save America, string theory isn t working as physics, and the price of food is going up because of rising temperatures. Plus, a new kind of coffee.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 and everything. Well, welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of your
00:00:04.040 entire existence. If you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even
00:00:09.840 really imagine, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or
00:00:14.300 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:21.260 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. Dopamine here today thing makes everything
00:00:26.820 better. It's called the simultaneous SIP. It happens now. Thanks, Paul. You saved me.
00:00:37.860 Ah. Well, that's good stuff. I got lots of little science-y stories and news stories and
00:00:46.060 maybe a little bit of a theme. But let's start with this. Elon Musk posted that he voted 100%
00:00:54.360 Democrat until a few years ago. And now he says, now I think we need a red wave or America is toast.
00:01:03.480 That does seem to be the case. It does seem to be that the political left is so batshit crazy
00:01:11.340 that letting them have another four years would be the end of the country, potentially. It does look
00:01:18.240 like it's an existential threat. And the existential threat would be batshit crazy women,
00:01:25.280 basically. Because if we could do something about the batshit crazy women,
00:01:29.920 the rest would take care of itself. You just got to get rid of that one insane group that got too much
00:01:35.800 power and we'll be in good shape. But I think a red wave would go a long way to make that happen.
00:01:40.400 All right. Here's a post on X that had me laughing for two days because I'm mad that I didn't think
00:01:48.480 of it myself. You ever have that situation where somebody makes a good point and you think,
00:01:54.020 oh, why didn't I ever say that? That's so smart. Well, Eric Weinstein said this about a string theory.
00:02:02.560 He goes, how do you know that string theory isn't working as physics despite expert assurances to the
00:02:09.160 contrary? And he says, the answer is, no one at all is in any way worried about the Iranians,
00:02:16.740 Russians, or Chinese getting their hands on our cutting edge string theory.
00:02:26.040 So how real is string theory if we don't have any concern whatsoever if our rivals get it? Now,
00:02:35.060 that doesn't just mean maybe has some potential military value, but at the very least, if it's
00:02:42.680 going to be anything useful at all, it would have economic use. But apparently we don't think it has
00:02:50.660 any value whatsoever because we don't protect it. Now, why didn't I ever think of that?
00:02:56.320 Have you ever thought of that? That there's no security whatsoever on this brand new theory of
00:03:04.740 physics? It's probably because nobody believes it's real. Like on some level, they know it's not
00:03:10.160 worth protecting, which I think is hilarious. Well, scientists warn in Germany, I guess, that the
00:03:18.440 price of food will go up every year from now on and 3% per year. And the problem is that the rising
00:03:25.740 temperatures, the rising temperatures will make food prices go up. Can anybody explain how a little
00:03:35.100 extra warmth makes it harder to grow crops? Because I always thought that that made your crops more
00:03:44.120 abundant. Well, what are they trying to tell us here? That sounds ridiculous to me on the surface,
00:03:50.700 because we know that warming is associated with the greening. The only way this would make sense
00:03:56.460 is that it simply changes where the greenery is. So maybe there's some places that dry out,
00:04:02.740 so they get a little drought, but some other place grows better. Now let me ask you a more important
00:04:09.240 question. Do you think they could really measure this? Do you think they can measure the difference in
00:04:17.980 food growth just based on temperature? Not just the difference, but how much of the difference
00:04:24.980 depends on it being a tenth of a degree warmer this year? Do you think they have that ability? No,
00:04:31.680 they don't. No. If you lived in the real world for five minutes, you know that the last thing science
00:04:39.520 would be able to do is figure out how the crops are different because of a tenth of a degree difference
00:04:44.920 from this year to last year. They can't do that. That's not a real thing. It's like saying that
00:04:51.200 they can measure the temperature. I was going to do a little demonstration, but I got lazy.
00:04:59.440 In one of my rooms in the house that I don't heat or cool, I just keep the door closed,
00:05:07.020 I put two thermometers in there. So one's a digital thermometer and one's a mercury thermometer.
00:05:15.640 And every day I go in and check to make sure that I'm getting the right temperature.
00:05:21.600 So I use one of the temperatures to check to see if the other temperature is correct.
00:05:27.400 Because otherwise, how would I know, right? Let's say the digital one was off.
00:05:32.600 How would I know? I might just see a number. So I put right next to it the mercury one.
00:05:38.840 So if it's like off a degree, I'll catch it. Do you know what the temperature difference is
00:05:45.800 of two thermometers sitting within three inches of each other? Five degrees. Five degrees.
00:05:53.960 One of them says 55 degrees. The other says 60. They're right next to each other. So how do I know
00:06:02.440 which is right? Well, I know the digital one's not right because I checked it against the mercury one.
00:06:08.820 And I know the mercury one is not right because I checked it against the digital one.
00:06:14.860 What exactly do they use to check their temperatures when they go do the reading?
00:06:20.260 You ever wonder about that? Do you think when they go out to service the machines or to
00:06:26.820 check the numbers on them, do they bring a separate device so they can sit next to it
00:06:32.580 and then find out if they get the same reading on both devices? Do you think they do that?
00:06:38.060 Of course not. Of course not. There's no way in the world we're measuring the temperature of the earth.
00:06:43.580 It's like one of the greatest scams of all time. Now, I don't know if the temperature of the earth
00:06:49.840 is going up or down or how much people are affecting it. I'm just saying that if we think
00:06:55.000 we can measure it, you haven't lived in any kind of real world for a while if you think that.
00:07:03.940 Anyway, there's a new study on marijuana that says that daily cannabis use has a 25%
00:07:13.340 increased risk of heart attack and a 42% increased risk of stroke.
00:07:20.260 Now, just try to hold this in your head. This is a really big effect. Would you agree?
00:07:28.200 Rarely do you find a scientific study that will say there's a 25% difference in anything, right?
00:07:36.300 That's a really big difference. And that's just for one thing. There's a 42% difference in the risk of stroke.
00:07:42.500 Now, those are really big differences. Am I right? So, with differences that big,
00:07:49.480 I'll bet you've noticed it in your real life, haven't you? Haven't you noticed all the daily
00:07:55.520 marijuana smokers falling over with heart attacks and strokes? I've never heard of one.
00:08:02.600 I've never actually heard of one. But let's do another one. We hear fentanyl is bad. Do you know
00:08:09.380 anybody who died of fentanyl? Yes. Yes, I do. I do. So, I believe that fentanyl is deadly.
00:08:17.580 Let's see. Do you believe anybody has ever died of regular cigarettes and getting lung cancer?
00:08:24.000 Yes, my mother. Yeah. Yep. Pretty normal thing. So, I do believe the cigarettes are associated or cause
00:08:33.040 lung cancer. But how could I get to my current age and never hear of one example of anybody had a
00:08:40.320 health problem with marijuana? So, the first filter is observation versus science. It doesn't
00:08:49.140 mean the science is wrong if your observation is different because you can be biased and confirmation
00:08:54.240 biased and all that. But if you don't see any correlation between the news that's telling you
00:09:01.380 there's this gigantic thing and you're looking around and you've never seen it, it should raise
00:09:06.600 the flag. But let me put it in these terms and see if it seems funnier. If it's true that they just
00:09:14.800 found a 25% increased risk of heart attack and 40% of stroke from daily marijuana users and we had
00:09:22.380 never detected that before. In all of the different marijuana studies, nobody had detected a 25% difference
00:09:32.160 or a 42% difference. We've never detected that before. This tells me one of two things. Either science was
00:09:42.480 never real until this year. Because really, all the science couldn't find this gigantic difference
00:09:50.600 for, what, a hundred years? Nobody noticed this. All those studies came up blank. But this one,
00:09:59.660 well, this new one, nailed it. So, either this is the first time science has ever been right
00:10:06.160 or this is bullshit. It's one or the other. You have to pick one. Either science has never been
00:10:14.340 real until this year. But they finally got it right after all that, all those messes. They finally
00:10:20.400 got it right. Or this is bullshit. I'm going to go with this bullshit because that's what I want to
00:10:26.920 believe. All right. There's another research that says that Viagra use decreases the risk of
00:10:38.040 Alzheimer's by 60%. Again, I ask, if there's a 60% decrease in Alzheimer's from boner pills,
00:10:47.980 nobody noticed that until now. Nobody found that correlation. Well, I think there might be a few
00:10:57.460 things going on. One is if you, I assume this is based on asking people for their own report.
00:11:06.420 So, they don't put a camera in the bedroom of the old folks and say, all right, I saw him taking a
00:11:11.220 Viagra. All right. And then I noticed that he was not having any Alzheimer's. No, it's got to be
00:11:18.680 self-reported, right? Wouldn't you say? They self-report that they take Viagra and then they either
00:11:26.440 self-report or there's some doctor report that says they had Alzheimer's or not. But do you see any
00:11:33.280 potential problem with that study? Makes you wonder if people remember they took the, maybe they forgot
00:11:43.300 they took the Viagra or they forgot they didn't. I don't know. Doing a study where you're self-reporting
00:11:50.600 and the group is, you're checking for Alzheimer's seems like a natural problem. I don't know. Maybe
00:11:54.900 they found a way to get around that. But I would say this is a big movement forward in science because
00:12:04.340 now, now that we know that the Viagra will help you with your sexual performance as well as your
00:12:11.840 mental performance, now a guy my age can bang a woman and also remember her name afterwards.
00:12:19.280 Now that's new. So it's a big step forward for science. All right. There's a estimate out of
00:12:29.440 the UK that artificial intelligence could take 84% of the government jobs because a lot of the
00:12:36.740 government jobs are just pushing paperwork around and stuff. So 84%. I'm going to do you one better.
00:12:44.560 I think AI could be the entire government and will be. Actually, I'll make that a prediction.
00:12:52.520 It won't happen on day one. But AI will actually be the entire government.
00:12:58.580 All you have to do is feed it a little, the constitution, a bunch of case law. It could do it
00:13:05.020 all. It could be the judge and jury. It could be the entire legal system. And it could do all your
00:13:11.560 paperwork, all your taxes. You shouldn't be able to just show all your information,
00:13:17.780 you know, just scan it in and have it do your taxes. Because if it sees all the documents,
00:13:22.060 what else does it need? You're not allowed to write anything down. You know, I mean,
00:13:26.960 you could tell it, oh, I gave some donations without a receipt or something. But
00:13:31.420 think about the cost of our government. Think what it costs to have a government. And then imagine
00:13:41.220 you could get rid of all those costs. Because it would just be, you just pick up your phone and
00:13:47.160 you're talking to the government. AI is a fad? I don't think so.
00:13:53.280 So there is a possibility that the national debt could be paid. It could be, I mean, obviously,
00:14:02.280 if we fired all these government employees, that'd be another problem. But it could be that we could
00:14:07.440 reduce the cost of government so much that we could pay off the debt. Think about how much we spend just
00:14:17.720 to keep government employees. And we don't need them. We might not need any of them. Now I'm going
00:14:24.280 to go full Star Trek on you. You ready? I'm going full Star Trek. In the future, all militaries will
00:14:35.100 be replaced by AI. Because the AI will accurately figure out who would have won the war. So you won't
00:14:45.920 need to do the war. It'll make a war unnecessary. Because it will just tell you who's going to win
00:14:53.160 and how long it will take and how many people would die. So instead of the, let's say, Ukraine-Russia
00:14:58.220 thing, if they had started gearing up for war, AI would have said, all right, it looks like this will
00:15:03.840 probably be some kind of a stalemate situation. But if Russia keeps at it and loses a half a million
00:15:10.080 people, they can definitely prevail in the long run, risk of nuclear war, you know, 25%, whatever
00:15:16.420 it is. And then everybody looks at it and they go, oh, okay, well, this isn't worth doing.
00:15:24.480 Now, obviously, that's super, you know, super, let's say, optimistic. But if you imagine, for example,
00:15:33.820 will AI helping us avoid war, then you make it a bigger topic, could it help us avoid war?
00:15:41.520 I think it actually could. Because in order to have a war, you almost always have to brainwash
00:15:47.060 some member of the public. Am I right? War is usually a brainwashing operation first
00:15:54.320 to get the country on its side. I saw a video today of an ex-CIA guy from, I don't know,
00:16:01.560 look like the 60s or something, talking in an interview and saying that one of the reasons
00:16:06.780 that the CIA does the big narrative, like the big narrative is communists are coming to take
00:16:13.800 over the world. We have to stop them everywhere, domino effect. That's not real. That's something
00:16:20.360 that the CIA told us. Do you know why? As the agent explained, if you want to take over the country
00:16:27.380 of Nicaragua using your CIA, you first have to say that there's the bigger reason that, oh,
00:16:34.500 it's part of the dominoes of communism. So we wouldn't really care about one little country
00:16:39.360 enough to, you know, care about taking over its government or staging a coup. But if you say,
00:16:47.180 oh, it's not really about the little country, it's about the dominoes. When I was a kid,
00:16:52.960 we all thought the dominoes was a thing. Oh, this one falls and the others fall. It's a domino
00:16:58.700 thing. So you always need the big story. And this will be my theme for today. You need the big
00:17:04.940 story that's completely made up in order to sell a war to your own public. Right? So Putin's got the
00:17:13.980 big story. That's, you know, NATO's against them and Russia. Russia used to own this stuff.
00:17:22.580 Israel's got the big story. You know, their version is they've always been there and, you
00:17:27.640 know, blah, blah, blah. That's the big story. So then they can do the little things as long
00:17:32.560 as it fits within the big story. Well, what happens if AI tells us the big story is not true?
00:17:38.760 Which it would, you know, unless it's completely fake AI. But the AI will say, you know what,
00:17:45.580 there's not really any reason for this war. It would make more sense to be allies. I think AI
00:17:51.700 would have said, war with Russia? Well, that's crazy. Why don't you just be allies? You could
00:17:56.580 make a lot of money. You don't really have anything that you're fighting over. Now, that's not true
00:18:01.940 because the war is really about resources. Imagine AI said, why would you have a war when
00:18:09.600 all your CIA did a coup in Ukraine and tried to sell it to your own public like it was some natural
00:18:15.740 thing? If AI told us as it was happening, oh, this is a CIA op here in Ukraine, you would have a
00:18:24.340 completely different opinion than if they said Russia is the big bear on the move trying to recreate
00:18:30.220 the Soviet Union. And they're going to start with Ukraine and Poland's next. See, the big story
00:18:37.360 is what gives them permission to do the thing they want to do, which is go blow up a pipeline,
00:18:43.580 take the oil business or the gas business mostly away from Russia. So if AI could blow up the big
00:18:51.420 story, there would be no wars because all the wars are about the big story. They're never about the
00:18:57.980 thing that's happening at the moment. It's always about the big story. What happens if the big
00:19:03.000 stories all go away? Because they're not real. The big stories are never real. They're all bullshit
00:19:08.660 in order to hypnotize the public to go to war. Anyway, so AI could get rid of militaries. It could
00:19:16.420 get rid of the government. There's going to be a lot of change coming. Apparently, Trump is in court
00:19:22.860 today, something over the Stormy Daniels case. Let's see if I can remember which one of the 91
00:19:29.260 indictments in law affairs of Stormy Daniels. Something about his penis. That's all I remember.
00:19:39.100 Does anybody remember anything else about that story except I think it involved his penis?
00:19:45.400 That's all I remember. So I don't think that one's going to take him down. I don't even know what
00:19:50.640 that one's about. But is today the day he's supposed to pay the half a million dollar fines? Or at least
00:19:56.780 the 400 something fine? Is today the day? Oh, it's not today? When does he have to pay it? I thought
00:20:09.360 it was today. Now, ask yourself, if you were Trump, how would you handle that deadline? Now, he said
00:20:18.980 publicly he has the cash. But we don't really think he necessarily does. So we don't know. What would be
00:20:26.960 the most Trumpian way to play this? I would like to make a suggestion. I would like the most Trump-like
00:20:35.040 thing to do was to keep the mystery until the last minute. So for example, if he did find a way to pay
00:20:43.220 it off, don't tell us until you write the check. Make us wonder all the way till the end.
00:20:52.300 Just a perfect Trump thing to do. And then it gets better. I want to see a video of him taking a
00:20:58.860 checkbook out of his pocket and asking for a pen and asking who he makes the check out to.
00:21:05.320 Don't you want to see him ask who to make the check out to? Do I make this out to Letitia James or
00:21:14.660 Judge Erdogan? What do I make? Do I just make it out to the Joe Biden, the Democrats? How do you want
00:21:22.980 this to go? And then they give him some official name. And then he just writes $450 million.
00:21:29.340 And we just have to watch him writing the check. And he writes a personal check for half a billion
00:21:37.120 dollars. What a baller thing that would be to write a personal check for half a billion dollars.
00:21:44.020 Now, my guess is they won't take a personal check, but it's still really funny. It would be funny to
00:21:50.020 have them watch them reject his personal check. Wouldn't you love to see that? You know,
00:21:55.740 have them hand it over to some, I don't know, some kind of a court official and have the court
00:22:03.200 official look at his personal check and say, do you have identification? Do you have a driver's
00:22:09.460 license? And then Trump would be, well, actually, I don't even have a driver's license. I haven't
00:22:15.260 driven in years. And then they would say, well, how do I know who you are? Would that be good TV?
00:22:21.660 Yes, it would. Pay it in cash. Pay it in pennies, you say. All right, what else is going on?
00:22:29.460 ISIS says they're going to release a longer video from the Moscow attacks. How is that possible?
00:22:36.840 Now, I don't know all the details of that Moscow attack, but did any of the attackers get away?
00:22:42.700 I thought they all got caught. If they all got caught, how could ISIS still have a video that we
00:22:48.440 haven't seen? Did they upload it while they were shooting? I doubt it. I think they were busy.
00:22:57.740 How in the world could ISIS have another video? Unless it was never ISIS. It was always an op.
00:23:06.280 Because if it was an op, yeah, we might have the video. But I can't imagine how the perps could have
00:23:14.300 gotten the video from the body cams all the way to some ISIS handler in the hot moments of the
00:23:23.400 firefighting. I don't know. Everything about that's suspicious. If I had to put my bet on it, I would
00:23:33.360 say it was American CIA trying to make it look like it was ISIS. What do you think? I think it was
00:23:42.020 our intelligence people just making it look like ISIS. That's my best guess. I think Putin's right
00:23:48.060 about that. But I could be wrong. So 60 Minutes talked to Mexico's president, Obrador. And it was
00:23:59.220 asked about all the fentanyl coming from Mexico. And he said, whoa, whoa, whoa. Fentanyl is also made in the
00:24:07.900 United States and Canada. So why are you picking on Mexico? And then the pathetic 60 Minutes person
00:24:17.840 said, well, you know, according to our officials, most of it comes from Mexico. That's not really
00:24:25.700 good enough, is it? If most of it came from Mexico, but we also make it in the United States,
00:24:32.380 wouldn't the production just switch to the United States or Canada? So it might be a good point that
00:24:41.160 the vast majority of it comes from Mexico, but he might have a point that it wouldn't matter where
00:24:46.180 it came from. Now, we assume that, well, I assume that the president of Mexico is essentially an employee
00:24:53.940 of the cartel of Mexico. And so, you know, he's going to say whatever's good for keeping the fentanyl
00:24:59.580 business going. But related to that, there's a study that finds that the fifth largest employer
00:25:07.760 in Mexico is the cartels. The fifth largest business, well, employer, I guess, fifth largest employer
00:25:20.660 is the cartels. Now, if your fifth largest employer is the cartels, and you're the president of Mexico,
00:25:27.940 Mexico, you can't really get out of the fentanyl business. But more importantly, since I think the
00:25:33.760 fentanyl business is largely a partnership between the cartels and U.S. intelligence agencies who find
00:25:41.580 it productive to work with bad guys, it's never going to stop. But here's something that the president
00:25:48.500 of Mexico did say helpfully. He said, did you ever notice why there's not a big drug problem in Mexico?
00:25:54.420 And I said to myself, wait, what? How could they have access to all the drugs? And yet they don't
00:26:04.200 have a drug problem in Mexico? And I thought about it, and I thought, I've never heard of a drug problem
00:26:09.900 in Mexico, have you? And he says that they don't have one because they celebrate their customs,
00:26:16.180 traditions, and they don't have a problem with the disintegration of the family.
00:26:19.840 Do you think that's it? Do you think that Mexicans don't do fentanyl because they have good families?
00:26:29.820 That seems a little simplistic. I feel like there's something happening there that we should understand.
00:26:37.820 Do you think they just drink more alcohol? I don't know. I don't exactly know. Maybe it's cultural.
00:26:44.060 Maybe they don't. Maybe if you're struggling, you don't think of fentanyl. Fentanyl to me always seemed like
00:26:53.960 the people who were not struggling in life but had to give themselves a problem. You know what I mean?
00:27:00.160 A lot of people born to middle-class families, every ability to go to college, get a job,
00:27:06.000 and they have these useless lives that don't make any sense. And then anything makes sense if nothing
00:27:14.000 makes sense. So I can see why maybe the meaningless of life in the United States contributes, whereas
00:27:21.500 there might be more meaning if you're working hard every day, you know, breaking your back just to eat,
00:27:27.040 and you've got family and religion. That's a lot of meaning. So I would say meaning is probably a big
00:27:36.860 part of it, but I don't know how much. All right. So I contend that if either the Mexican government
00:27:46.220 wanted to stop the fentanyl trade or the American government, either one, it would have stopped.
00:27:52.260 Is that fair? That if either one, and it would only take one, you don't even need the other one
00:27:58.300 to agree. If either Mexico wanted to stop it or the U.S. wanted to stop it, it wouldn't look anything
00:28:04.060 the way it looks. It would be completely different. So I think we have to assume that it's intentional
00:28:10.960 on the part of our own government as well as Mexico. And so that means that we're probably working
00:28:17.640 with the cartels. President of Mexico proposes that we would handle immigration this way. He says the
00:28:24.740 U.S. should commit to $20 billion a year to the poor countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
00:28:29.960 You know, that would keep people home. Lift sanctions on Venezuela, which would allow their
00:28:34.920 economy to improve so people would stay home. And end the Cuban embargo. I don't know exactly how
00:28:42.280 that fits into the whole thing. And then legalize law-abiding Mexicans living in the U.S. So
00:28:47.580 basically just make them all citizens, at least the Mexicans he's talking about.
00:28:55.120 Well, how do you think of that idea? I don't know. Every time somebody has an idea for what America
00:29:06.480 should do, it's like, well, you start with reaching into your pocket and running up some debt and
00:29:13.520 giving us billions of dollars. All right. Well, I may have said this yesterday, but I think that the
00:29:19.540 squatter situation is the most persuasive thing happening in politics. Anybody want to agree or
00:29:28.180 disagree? That all the video, especially of the squatters taking over people's homes,
00:29:33.940 that's the number one most persuasive thing I've ever seen in politics. I've never seen anything
00:29:40.960 on this level. Because here's what it has. It's got the visual, right? Because we've got videos of
00:29:47.020 the actual homes taking over. You've got fear. Fear is the number one persuader. But the fear of
00:29:54.280 literally criminals taking over your house, that's like really scary. But on top of that,
00:30:01.500 we care more about losing something we had, especially if you worked all your life and it's
00:30:07.280 your main asset in life, your fear of losing the main thing you worked for all your life
00:30:12.780 is just off the chart. It's just off the chart. Now, almost everything else feels like it could be
00:30:20.000 somebody else's problem. Like when I see crime, I do worry that it'll get me too. But I largely watch
00:30:27.800 it as a story about other people. I don't know if you have that experience. If you're not in the
00:30:33.100 middle of the crime, it feels like something happening to other people. But when I see a
00:30:37.240 video of somebody losing their house and how easy it was, that's personal to me. Like I change my
00:30:47.540 vacation plans. Not really, but you know what I mean. I mean, I actually will act differently
00:30:53.040 because of that risk. Yeah. And we see, what state is it? Minnesota or somebody is going to
00:31:03.920 pay people $500 to keep migrants in their house. Just think of that. Which one is that? Let's see.
00:31:11.540 Some stupid state. I can't remember which one. No, not North Korea. All right. One of our stupid
00:31:21.980 states. Oh, here it is, Michigan. So Michigan is going to give $500 a month to homeowners if
00:31:30.320 they let what they call the newcomers or the immigrants, the migrants, live there in their
00:31:35.580 house for $500 a month. So do you see any problem with that? Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you
00:31:45.640 bring in a roommate who's a migrant and then you drive your kids to school, the migrant can change
00:31:54.220 the locks on the house and take your house. Am I wrong? I'm right, aren't I? They can move into your
00:32:02.280 house and pay you nothing and change the locks when you go on vacation and then it's their
00:32:06.400 house. I don't know if that works in Michigan, but in, I don't know, 22 states that would work.
00:32:13.880 Just think about how dumb everything is right now. And I'll tell you in a bit why everything
00:32:22.220 is so dumb if you hadn't figured it out. I'll tell you in a minute. All right. A federal
00:32:31.920 judge in DC upheld a law allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. So the vote has
00:32:40.540 been given to non-citizens in DC. Let me see who that judge is. Oh, it's a batshit crazy
00:32:49.580 liberal white woman. Yep. So, oh, here's a surprise. Somebody doing something that's clearly not in
00:32:58.160 the interest of the United States or any of the citizens. Who would do such a thing? A batshit
00:33:04.820 crazy liberal woman. Yeah. Now, other people might do it, but there's definitely a theme that's hard
00:33:14.580 to miss. James Garville didn't miss it. He says, and I quote, a suspicion of mine is that there are too
00:33:22.880 many preachy females. That would be your batshit crazy females. Don't drink beer. Don't watch
00:33:30.360 football. Don't eat hamburgers. This is not good for you. He said, the message is too feminine,
00:33:35.580 meaning the Democrat message. Everything you're doing is destroying the planet. You've got to eat
00:33:40.360 your peas. And then he goes on. If you, if you listen to democratic elites, NPR is my go-to place for
00:33:51.440 that. The whole talk is about how women and women of color are going to decide this election. And he
00:33:56.860 says, I'm like, well, 48% of the people that vote are males. Do you mind if they have some
00:34:01.900 consideration? That's right. So in the Democrat party is clearly the female party. James Garville
00:34:11.280 is quite aware of it. And part of the problem of having a female party is that there, apparently,
00:34:16.780 there are some tasks that women just can't do. Now, when I say that, does it mean every single woman?
00:34:24.120 Does it mean that Margaret Thatcher can't do it? No, it doesn't mean every woman. It never means
00:34:31.240 every single person. But clearly, we have a problem with crazy, liberal white women.
00:34:39.580 It's crazy, liberal white women. And if you can't say it out loud, you can't fix it.
00:34:43.860 So this is the value of canceled people. Because I'm a canceled person, I can say out loud what
00:34:49.500 you're all thinking. What the hell is wrong with these crazy white women who are doing things that
00:34:53.960 are bad for the country? Somewhat obviously, like really obviously, yeah, the awfuls, as they're called.
00:35:01.240 So let's see. Got that going on. We'll get back to that theme. Mike Cernovich looked at the
00:35:10.780 court ruling about that half a billion dollar fine on Trump. And apparently, if you look into the
00:35:16.280 details, and Mike is qualified to do that, it's way worse than you think. You know how there was no
00:35:25.760 victim? Normally, a fine would be based on the victims. Like, you know, they lost this much
00:35:33.300 allegedly, so you paid them this much, maybe a little extra for whatever. But it would be largely
00:35:39.220 based on what the cost to somebody else was. Do you know what they did in this case? Since there was no
00:35:46.180 victim. They based the size of the fine. I swear to God, I'm not making this up on how much profit he made.
00:35:58.460 Just think about that. They, the fine is based on how much profit he made.
00:36:03.540 Because they said, he wouldn't have deserved that profit, except for the fraud. They had no cost,
00:36:14.880 and everybody involved made money and was happy about it. So they took his profit away.
00:36:19.760 Also, Mike Cernovich points out, they, they negated the severance package between Trump and his former
00:36:27.480 CFO, the guy who also is going to jail. So Trump was okay with the severance package. Trump organization
00:36:34.800 was okay with it. The guy who was going to get it was okay with it. And the judge decided to void it.
00:36:42.080 What?
00:36:42.520 What? What? How do you void somebody's contract that's completely legal and both sides are happy
00:36:51.340 with it? That happened. You didn't know that detail until Mike Cernovich looked into it.
00:37:01.120 So to me, it looks like just theft by the government. I think Mike said something like that too.
00:37:05.480 And it's, it's, it's, it's, there's, there's no precedent for this. And, and Mike also pointed out
00:37:14.980 that the, the case law used for the precedent didn't even apply. It was just, just a completely
00:37:20.740 made up fine, made up case. Yeah. So there you go. I have a theory about why DEI still persists.
00:37:35.480 Because I do keep running into people online who don't understand why it's a problem.
00:37:42.120 And, and I've decided that I started out thinking it was like a philosophical problem or there's a
00:37:48.640 difference in priorities, something like that. But really the DEI thing is that people who are bad at
00:37:55.560 analysis have a different opinion than the people who are good at analysis and have experience.
00:38:01.220 This is purely a logic question. And I went back and forth with somebody I think is smart,
00:38:08.640 but still couldn't figure it out. So apparently the people on the left believe that it's a demand
00:38:17.400 problem. That if you could get the corporations to try harder to hire people who are in the diverse
00:38:24.560 categories, you get a better outcome and you could do it without lowering the quality of the
00:38:30.000 employees. They actually think that. To which I say, that might work for Google, right? Because
00:38:40.720 Google would be a, you know, or Apple or somebody who are a real first level employer, but they're
00:38:46.080 going to suck up all of the available high quality, diverse people because they want to look diverse.
00:38:52.780 So they're going to suck up everybody who's good. Well, who's left? Every other company is going to have
00:38:58.660 to get some diversity and all the good ones just got sucked up. If there were enough people, it would be
00:39:04.640 great. But there's this imaginary view that there's some magical Negro somewhere who's got high
00:39:12.400 qualifications. By the way, that's based on the movie, The Magical Negro. I'm not, that's not a racial thing I
00:39:18.780 just made up on my own. In movies, there's a thing called The Magical Negro who like solves a problem
00:39:25.920 in the end of the movie in kind of a trite, stereotypical way or something. So that's a movie
00:39:32.120 term. But where was I? Oh, DEI. So people really believe that there's a, there's a demand problem.
00:39:46.420 Have any of you ever worked for a major corporation? They have insatiable demand for
00:39:54.020 diversity. They're looking everywhere for it. They're trying as hard as they can. And even if
00:39:59.340 you changed all the, you know, DEI tomorrow, if you get, if you got rid of all the DEI, they would
00:40:04.640 still try really hard. The reason they have to try so hard is that it's not possible. It's, it's a game
00:40:11.900 in which a few could win, you know, a Google and an Apple, they, they might actually be able to hire
00:40:17.580 enough people of exactly the quality they need. But once you've hired all those people, you end up
00:40:23.680 with a supply problem, which is not enough. And for some reason, that concept of there's not enough,
00:40:32.420 Democrats don't seem to understand that. How do you not understand supply and demand?
00:40:41.160 And the part that they really don't understand is that the managers who have tasks and bonuses that
00:40:48.100 depend on increasing diversity, they are going to hire diverse. They're just going to lower their
00:40:54.160 standards. And, and I swear to God, you can't get anybody to understand that that's not just a risk.
00:41:00.360 It's a guarantee built into the system. If you give somebody the bonus this year, like just a few
00:41:08.760 months from now, based on whether I've hired diverse candidates, I will hire diverse candidates. I will,
00:41:16.720 I will manage to my bonus. And then you say to me, but Scott, in the long run, that's not going to work
00:41:24.480 out for you. Because if you really did lower your standards, your performance of your group you're hiring
00:41:30.220 for would be bad in the long run, and they would just catch up to you. You know what I say to that?
00:41:35.600 Well, if it catches up to me after I get the bonus, I'm going to play for the bonus.
00:41:40.880 That's what I'm going to do. And then next year, I'm going to say, yeah, my project is not finished,
00:41:45.460 but it's not because you forced me to hire people who are less qualified. It's because blah, blah, blah,
00:41:51.340 the supply chain or something. I'll just make up corporate reasons why I'm not done. And I'll just say
00:41:57.140 it wasn't anything to do with diversity, just bad luck. Competitors did better timing, didn't have
00:42:02.880 enough budget, all that stuff. Right? So you, here's the thing that, and I guess this is what
00:42:09.700 people don't understand. In the corporate world, you measure to what you, you manage to what is
00:42:17.020 measurable. And diversity is 100% measurable the way we do it. Is this candidate black? I don't know.
00:42:26.280 Could you make them look black on paper? Well, they've got a little bit of black in there. So
00:42:31.300 yes. So we know how to measure it. So the thing that you can measure is what all managers will
00:42:38.320 manage to. The thing you can't measure is whether or not, if you'd hired differently,
00:42:44.820 you would have gotten a different outcome. You'll never know. So you don't measure to the thing that
00:42:51.720 you don't manage to what can't be measured now or ever. You manage to what can be measured,
00:42:57.580 the diversity level, and you give up everything else to get there. That's the real world. Now,
00:43:04.240 how do people not understand that? How is that a hard concept? I think if you have no experience
00:43:11.420 in the real world as a hiring person, which I've done, if you have no experience, it wouldn't be
00:43:17.560 obvious. Like it doesn't really jump right out at you as that's what would happen. But once someone
00:43:23.580 has explained that there's a limitation in the supply, what do people think happens? Like in the
00:43:32.140 real world, do you think people just miss their goals? Never. You're going to hire whatever gives
00:43:38.980 you that bonus, period. All right. California job growth apparently is the ranks dead last in the
00:43:47.760 U.S. for the first time since 1993. I wonder why California's growth in jobs would be less than
00:43:57.720 every other country. Is there anything we do here in California that would be, let's say,
00:44:04.780 I don't know, negative to humans who live here or businesses? Could it be that we're running out of
00:44:12.840 energy, water, we can't get insurance because of our fires and there's no affordability of housing
00:44:19.120 and all we have is regulations and the highest taxes you've ever seen in your life and it's getting
00:44:24.660 worse and crime everywhere and unchecked immigration? Could it be that when you do all the things that are
00:44:33.180 obviously really bad for business and for human beings that it makes a difference? Yeah. Safety,
00:44:41.200 safety, yeah. Apparently it makes a difference. So I guess you don't get to work at In-N-Out in
00:44:47.100 Oakland because Oakland's too poorly managed to have an In-N-Out. They don't get to have one.
00:44:53.320 The city is too poorly managed. So good job, California. You might know there was a study that
00:45:00.400 showed that the fact checkers are almost entirely left-leaning and super left-leaning. You all knew
00:45:06.500 that, right? So apparently there's not much in the way of conservative fact checkers anywhere.
00:45:12.260 So the fact checkers are all fake. They're there to support Democrats basically. And Michael
00:45:20.060 Schellenberger is talking about this fact checker who got it wrong. The Australian government is
00:45:24.600 demanding that ex-Facebook and other social media companies censor content that its fact checkers say
00:45:30.560 is inaccurate. What? But now one of the government's main fact checker groups has been caught spreading
00:45:37.540 misinformation about renewables and nuclear. So the trouble is that the fact checkers, if you believe
00:45:43.140 that they're real, which they're not, all the fact checkers are fake, that your news is going to
00:45:51.700 follow the fact checkers and you end up doing your nuclear and everything else wrong. So the fact
00:45:57.460 checkers are actually a mortal risk to the existence of civilization. Now, if we had free speech,
00:46:05.000 which largely don't, then the fact checking wouldn't make as much difference because people would check
00:46:11.320 the fact checkers. But if you bubble everybody off so they don't see anybody else's opinion,
00:46:17.000 the fact checkers could be too powerful, which is what's happening now.
00:46:21.700 France has a new terror alert. So France raised its security alert to the highest level
00:46:28.140 following the Moscow attack. Now, do you think that's a fake out?
00:46:34.160 Since everything's fake,
00:46:37.220 so do you think that ISIS
00:46:38.900 is more likely to attack France
00:46:42.800 than it was a month ago? Does that seem likely?
00:46:47.100 No. You know what I think is likely? I think that France needs to support the idea that it was
00:46:58.680 some kind of Islamic terrorist. And so they're raising their alerts to make it look like,
00:47:05.760 hey, these Islamic terrorists, they could be coming after us too, Russia.
00:47:09.660 Wait, why would you think we were behind it?
00:47:13.780 I mean, we just had to raise our terror alerts
00:47:16.420 too. I mean,
00:47:18.120 why would you think we were behind it?
00:47:20.660 I mean, look, we have the same risk.
00:47:22.960 We've raised our terror alert risk.
00:47:26.220 I don't know.
00:47:27.600 To me, it looks a little bit
00:47:29.540 artificial.
00:47:32.820 Now, if there's a big terror attack in France
00:47:35.420 in the next two weeks, I'm going to eat my words.
00:47:39.860 But it sounds a little bit
00:47:41.700 too much like supporting the narrative.
00:47:44.540 No, it wasn't the Americans
00:47:46.200 and the CIA who
00:47:47.860 bankrolled those bad people in Moscow.
00:47:50.740 No, no, it wasn't Ukraine.
00:47:53.120 No, it's a
00:47:53.900 this is a risk we all share.
00:47:56.780 So France,
00:47:57.920 we're under the same risk you were
00:47:59.860 in Moscow.
00:48:01.860 Doesn't look real to me.
00:48:03.060 Meanwhile, a Boston activist
00:48:06.200 is seeking $15 billion
00:48:07.720 in reparations
00:48:08.880 for slavery
00:48:10.140 and calling on white churches
00:48:12.100 to commit to extending their wealth
00:48:13.820 to black people.
00:48:15.380 Have you ever seen
00:48:16.460 a worse year
00:48:17.720 for the black brand
00:48:19.080 in America?
00:48:21.120 This is the number one
00:48:22.640 worst year
00:48:23.380 for black Americans
00:48:24.880 in terms of
00:48:25.960 their reputation
00:48:26.840 in America.
00:48:27.800 Let me just give you
00:48:28.640 a sample
00:48:29.200 of what's happened
00:48:30.720 just recently.
00:48:31.480 we'll go back
00:48:32.920 a couple of years.
00:48:34.700 So we've got
00:48:35.820 all black prosecutors
00:48:37.520 going after Trump.
00:48:39.320 Do you think
00:48:40.080 anybody noticed
00:48:40.840 that the prosecutors
00:48:43.020 seem to be
00:48:43.760 very black?
00:48:47.840 Now,
00:48:48.560 that could be
00:48:49.600 a coincidence.
00:48:50.420 It could have
00:48:50.900 just to do with
00:48:51.600 the domains
00:48:52.460 that are going
00:48:53.420 at him.
00:48:54.940 But it doesn't look
00:48:56.040 like a coincidence.
00:48:57.380 It looks like
00:48:58.360 lawfare
00:48:58.940 and it looks like
00:49:00.340 all of these
00:49:01.000 black women
00:49:01.680 who are
00:49:02.740 DAs
00:49:03.780 and attorney generals,
00:49:05.760 they look like
00:49:06.480 criminals
00:49:06.900 to me.
00:49:09.080 And it's much worse
00:49:10.100 to look like
00:49:10.820 a criminal
00:49:11.300 in an official job.
00:49:13.880 So if you're
00:49:15.160 Bob Menendez,
00:49:16.320 Gold Bar Bob,
00:49:17.980 it looks worse
00:49:19.260 that he's a criminal
00:49:20.580 and he's an elected
00:49:22.400 representative.
00:49:23.000 Right?
00:49:25.480 If it's just
00:49:26.100 a regular crime,
00:49:27.000 you go,
00:49:27.280 oh,
00:49:27.440 it's just
00:49:27.700 a regular crime.
00:49:28.900 But it looks
00:49:29.980 way worse
00:49:30.800 that elected
00:49:31.700 officials
00:49:32.260 and prosecutors
00:49:34.100 are clearly
00:49:35.280 criminal.
00:49:36.080 I would say
00:49:36.540 obviously criminal.
00:49:38.680 Yeah.
00:49:38.900 Now,
00:49:39.120 there are some
00:49:39.500 white people
00:49:39.940 in there,
00:49:40.320 but the faces
00:49:41.420 we see the most
00:49:42.560 are the prosecutors.
00:49:44.700 You're seeing
00:49:45.120 Letitia James
00:49:45.960 and Fonnie Willis
00:49:46.940 the most.
00:49:48.120 So I'm not saying
00:49:49.300 what's true or false.
00:49:50.340 I'm just saying
00:49:50.900 that the impression
00:49:51.680 that people will get
00:49:52.720 is black faces
00:49:55.640 doing something
00:49:56.560 obviously illegal
00:49:57.580 in front of all of us.
00:49:59.440 So that's bad.
00:50:00.260 If you were black,
00:50:01.040 you'd hate that.
00:50:04.140 Of course,
00:50:04.960 DEI is a terrible
00:50:06.540 stain on black
00:50:07.540 Americans
00:50:07.980 because,
00:50:08.460 you know,
00:50:08.980 the nickname
00:50:10.660 didn't earn it
00:50:11.500 is exactly what
00:50:13.200 every non-black
00:50:14.460 person thinks
00:50:15.180 about it
00:50:15.660 who is not
00:50:16.760 crazy,
00:50:17.840 batshit,
00:50:18.500 liberal.
00:50:19.940 So DEI
00:50:21.460 is probably
00:50:21.880 the worst
00:50:22.340 reputational stain
00:50:23.460 for black
00:50:23.940 Americans
00:50:24.400 in my memory.
00:50:26.660 Then you've got
00:50:27.480 the reparations
00:50:28.380 programs,
00:50:29.300 which to
00:50:30.060 non-black people
00:50:31.140 look like theft.
00:50:32.760 It looks like
00:50:33.640 just some kind
00:50:34.600 of organized
00:50:35.220 theft.
00:50:36.800 So I just see it
00:50:37.980 as an attempt
00:50:38.900 to rob me.
00:50:39.800 That's not a good
00:50:41.980 look.
00:50:43.060 An organized
00:50:43.860 attempt to rob
00:50:44.560 me.
00:50:46.480 The whole
00:50:47.180 George Floyd
00:50:48.060 narrative fell
00:50:49.120 apart.
00:50:50.780 And so black
00:50:51.980 people picking
00:50:52.600 George Floyd
00:50:53.260 to build statues
00:50:54.120 to and to use
00:50:54.940 as a role
00:50:56.020 model is a
00:50:56.700 terrible look
00:50:57.400 from anybody
00:50:58.580 else's perspective.
00:50:59.820 And now we're
00:51:00.780 pretty sure that
00:51:01.380 George Floyd
00:51:01.940 actually died
00:51:02.700 of an overdose.
00:51:04.040 Most of us
00:51:04.700 are sure of that.
00:51:05.380 and that the
00:51:06.460 white guy
00:51:06.880 got railroaded
00:51:09.780 and prosecuted.
00:51:12.420 So that's a
00:51:14.100 terrible look.
00:51:15.540 Terrible look.
00:51:16.620 We know that
00:51:17.220 Black Lives Matter
00:51:18.060 the organization
00:51:18.800 was never real.
00:51:19.960 It was just a
00:51:20.660 big grifter scam
00:51:21.840 and probably
00:51:22.500 organized by our
00:51:23.840 intelligence people.
00:51:24.720 that's a bad
00:51:26.440 look.
00:51:28.800 We found out
00:51:29.780 that the whole
00:51:30.300 problem of
00:51:30.980 police killing
00:51:31.760 black people
00:51:32.480 at an unusually
00:51:34.160 high rate
00:51:34.680 was never
00:51:35.720 true.
00:51:37.340 That's a bad
00:51:38.280 look.
00:51:39.680 That was never
00:51:40.620 true.
00:51:41.740 And we
00:51:42.100 reorganized
00:51:43.780 civilization based
00:51:44.880 on it.
00:51:45.600 It was never
00:51:46.020 true.
00:51:46.960 We changed
00:51:47.480 all of
00:51:47.940 civilization
00:51:48.600 based on
00:51:49.920 that.
00:51:51.360 Great going
00:51:52.140 guys.
00:51:53.500 That really
00:51:54.260 helped.
00:51:54.720 And then I
00:51:56.740 think people
00:51:57.160 are slowly
00:51:57.780 waking up
00:51:58.320 to the
00:51:58.540 fact that
00:51:59.080 one of
00:51:59.720 the biggest
00:52:00.080 complaints
00:52:00.700 of hiring
00:52:02.480 discrimination
00:52:03.520 was never
00:52:04.800 real.
00:52:05.940 At least
00:52:06.300 not in
00:52:06.640 any big
00:52:06.920 company.
00:52:07.840 In big
00:52:08.200 companies
00:52:08.560 they are
00:52:09.160 craving,
00:52:10.860 thirsting,
00:52:11.780 and trying
00:52:12.260 as hard
00:52:12.620 as they
00:52:12.900 can to
00:52:13.360 hire
00:52:13.560 diverse
00:52:14.080 people.
00:52:15.300 And always
00:52:15.560 have,
00:52:16.220 in my
00:52:16.420 experience,
00:52:17.520 always have.
00:52:18.480 Before DEI
00:52:19.420 was even a
00:52:19.980 phrase,
00:52:21.060 corporations
00:52:21.500 were trying
00:52:22.100 really hard
00:52:22.860 to improve
00:52:23.860 their diversity.
00:52:24.480 And now
00:52:28.500 we know
00:52:28.920 that the
00:52:30.420 discrimination
00:52:31.020 against black
00:52:32.000 people in
00:52:32.440 hiring was
00:52:33.080 the opposite.
00:52:34.300 It was a
00:52:34.900 strong,
00:52:35.460 strong preference
00:52:36.120 and the
00:52:36.660 discrimination
00:52:37.100 was against
00:52:37.780 white people
00:52:38.340 and Asians,
00:52:40.320 Asian Americans.
00:52:42.700 So I would
00:52:43.460 say if you put
00:52:43.940 all those
00:52:44.260 things together,
00:52:45.220 the reparations,
00:52:46.340 the DEI,
00:52:47.100 the black
00:52:47.460 prosecutors going
00:52:48.440 after Trump,
00:52:49.680 the George
00:52:50.240 Floyd thing
00:52:50.820 falling apart,
00:52:51.520 black lives
00:52:52.060 never been
00:52:52.460 real,
00:52:53.260 the police
00:52:54.460 stuff never
00:52:56.200 real,
00:52:57.560 and the
00:52:58.420 discrimination,
00:53:00.140 again,
00:53:01.000 narrative never
00:53:01.800 real.
00:53:03.120 So I would
00:53:04.400 think it's
00:53:04.780 probably the
00:53:05.260 worst five
00:53:06.180 years for the
00:53:07.340 reputation of
00:53:08.020 black Americans,
00:53:08.740 and I think
00:53:10.000 that might be
00:53:10.520 at least part
00:53:11.420 of why Trump
00:53:12.720 is looking
00:53:13.160 better to at
00:53:13.860 least black
00:53:14.340 men,
00:53:14.960 because he's
00:53:16.640 treating them
00:53:17.100 like adults,
00:53:19.300 just treating
00:53:19.920 them like
00:53:20.220 everybody else,
00:53:21.140 which is a
00:53:22.840 way better
00:53:23.240 look.
00:53:24.340 If you look
00:53:26.100 at this list
00:53:26.740 of things and
00:53:27.360 say to yourself,
00:53:28.560 what do you
00:53:29.000 think of black
00:53:29.540 Americans in
00:53:31.060 the context
00:53:31.680 of DEI and
00:53:33.360 all this stuff?
00:53:34.740 And I'd say,
00:53:35.640 well, that's
00:53:36.000 not a good
00:53:36.460 look.
00:53:37.520 That's not a
00:53:38.080 good look.
00:53:38.480 Obviously,
00:53:39.580 these are all
00:53:40.320 general things
00:53:40.880 that don't apply
00:53:41.540 to any one
00:53:42.160 person,
00:53:43.300 blah, blah,
00:53:43.860 everybody is
00:53:44.460 infinitely unique,
00:53:45.840 blah, blah.
00:53:46.640 But it's a
00:53:47.220 bad look for
00:53:48.000 your brand,
00:53:49.440 right?
00:53:49.800 If white
00:53:50.920 people were
00:53:51.420 doing any
00:53:51.900 of the
00:53:52.120 things on
00:53:52.520 this list,
00:53:53.300 I'd be
00:53:54.080 embarrassed.
00:53:55.560 And even
00:53:56.160 if I didn't
00:53:56.700 do them,
00:53:57.820 I'd be
00:53:58.200 embarrassed for
00:53:58.880 my brand.
00:54:01.240 Well, maybe
00:54:02.500 we shouldn't
00:54:02.860 have a
00:54:03.120 brand.
00:54:03.540 Maybe we
00:54:03.840 should just
00:54:04.120 be
00:54:04.300 individuals.
00:54:11.120 Remember
00:54:11.560 I told you
00:54:12.140 about how
00:54:13.400 the CIA
00:54:14.020 likes to
00:54:14.760 have a
00:54:15.200 big threat
00:54:17.240 like communism
00:54:18.380 that allows
00:54:20.220 them to do
00:54:20.660 the small
00:54:21.160 things they
00:54:21.600 want to
00:54:21.860 do,
00:54:22.720 such as
00:54:23.240 maybe
00:54:23.520 overthrow
00:54:24.080 Nicaragua.
00:54:25.700 Right?
00:54:26.280 Understand that
00:54:27.120 concept.
00:54:28.320 The intelligence
00:54:28.900 people get
00:54:30.440 this big
00:54:30.900 umbrella threat
00:54:31.780 and then that
00:54:33.200 allows them to
00:54:33.720 do things
00:54:34.200 within that
00:54:35.020 umbrella.
00:54:37.220 Now, do you
00:54:38.100 understand Black
00:54:38.880 Lives Matter
00:54:39.420 better?
00:54:41.460 Black Lives
00:54:42.160 Matter was about
00:54:42.920 creating a big
00:54:44.100 umbrella threat
00:54:44.980 that was
00:54:45.300 never real so
00:54:47.320 that they
00:54:47.680 could do
00:54:47.980 individual
00:54:48.440 things like
00:54:49.020 change laws
00:54:49.780 and do
00:54:51.040 things they
00:54:51.440 want to do
00:54:51.760 on that
00:54:52.020 level.
00:54:53.700 Do you
00:54:54.000 know why
00:54:55.640 Biden is
00:54:56.520 talking about
00:54:57.040 MAGA and
00:54:57.580 white supremacists,
00:54:58.840 which is
00:54:59.360 completely not
00:55:00.060 real?
00:55:01.220 And why he's
00:55:01.980 trying to
00:55:02.300 create this
00:55:02.700 umbrella risk
00:55:03.740 of MAGA?
00:55:05.480 It's so you
00:55:06.200 can lock up
00:55:06.760 the January
00:55:07.240 6th people.
00:55:09.120 Because if the
00:55:09.860 only thing you
00:55:10.300 were doing is
00:55:10.740 just locking
00:55:11.220 up the January
00:55:11.820 6th people,
00:55:12.540 it would look
00:55:12.820 terrible.
00:55:13.160 But if it's
00:55:14.760 part of this
00:55:15.320 larger MAGA
00:55:17.000 white supremacy
00:55:17.940 insurrectionist
00:55:18.920 group, well
00:55:20.180 then any
00:55:20.700 individual person
00:55:21.540 you put in
00:55:21.960 jail makes
00:55:23.140 sense, doesn't
00:55:24.980 it?
00:55:25.960 What about
00:55:26.800 everything is
00:55:27.880 Russia, Russia,
00:55:28.660 Putin?
00:55:29.880 That's just
00:55:30.620 the new
00:55:31.000 communism.
00:55:32.640 Yeah.
00:55:33.000 If we can
00:55:33.760 say that
00:55:34.140 everything
00:55:34.480 happening
00:55:34.940 anywhere is
00:55:35.860 Putin's fault,
00:55:36.940 whether it's
00:55:37.420 politics or
00:55:38.120 Ukraine, then
00:55:39.540 you can do
00:55:40.020 all kinds of
00:55:40.580 things.
00:55:41.460 You can
00:55:42.200 overthrow
00:55:42.740 Kiev, you
00:55:44.280 know, you
00:55:44.500 can just
00:55:45.580 anything, because
00:55:46.880 you've got this
00:55:47.300 big old Putin
00:55:48.240 problem.
00:55:49.680 So now that
00:55:50.180 you see this
00:55:50.680 technique where
00:55:52.020 they, in
00:55:52.680 order to do
00:55:53.200 the small
00:55:53.700 things they
00:55:54.180 want to do
00:55:54.760 to fuck
00:55:56.120 you, they
00:55:57.240 have to put
00:55:57.700 this umbrella
00:55:58.380 of fear over
00:55:59.200 it, then you
00:56:00.500 understand that
00:56:01.120 the umbrella
00:56:01.620 of fear is
00:56:02.180 never real.
00:56:04.000 Have you
00:56:04.620 heard of
00:56:04.880 climate change?
00:56:08.060 Climate
00:56:08.540 change is an
00:56:09.340 umbrella threat
00:56:10.300 threat to
00:56:11.600 allow them
00:56:12.080 to do the
00:56:12.540 little things
00:56:13.080 that they
00:56:13.380 wanted to
00:56:13.840 do.
00:56:16.380 Do you
00:56:16.900 see it
00:56:17.160 now?
00:56:18.380 Do you see
00:56:19.060 the play?
00:56:19.500 It's always
00:56:19.780 the same
00:56:20.120 play.
00:56:20.860 There's this
00:56:21.460 big general
00:56:22.380 threat that
00:56:24.120 the media
00:56:24.660 sells to the
00:56:25.380 public because
00:56:26.260 the media
00:56:26.700 works for
00:56:27.240 the CIA.
00:56:28.740 And the
00:56:29.300 CIA does
00:56:30.140 operate in the
00:56:30.760 United States
00:56:31.340 to brainwash
00:56:32.060 these citizens,
00:56:33.320 and this is
00:56:33.800 how they do
00:56:34.240 it.
00:56:34.840 They give you
00:56:35.620 an umbrella
00:56:36.140 threat to
00:56:37.240 allow them
00:56:37.680 to do
00:56:37.920 what they
00:56:38.180 need to
00:56:38.520 do below.
00:56:41.100 What about
00:56:41.700 the pandemic?
00:56:44.360 The pandemic
00:56:45.300 gave them a
00:56:46.060 global threat
00:56:46.840 that allowed
00:56:48.180 them to
00:56:48.800 what?
00:56:50.800 Censor.
00:56:51.940 It allowed
00:56:52.660 them to
00:56:53.100 censor the
00:56:53.680 people they
00:56:54.100 wanted to
00:56:54.500 censor,
00:56:55.240 which turned
00:56:56.200 out to be
00:56:56.700 largely
00:56:57.100 political
00:56:57.820 opponents.
00:56:59.460 Oh,
00:56:59.980 surprising.
00:57:01.160 Surprising.
00:57:01.860 There was a
00:57:02.160 big umbrella
00:57:02.700 threat that
00:57:03.300 didn't really
00:57:03.840 look as bad
00:57:04.680 after the
00:57:05.320 fact.
00:57:06.500 You notice
00:57:06.900 that none
00:57:07.200 of these
00:57:07.540 threats look
00:57:08.420 as bad
00:57:09.000 after the
00:57:09.480 fact?
00:57:10.620 After the
00:57:11.360 media stops
00:57:12.020 brainwashing
00:57:12.700 you, and
00:57:13.760 a little time
00:57:14.260 goes by,
00:57:14.940 you think,
00:57:16.180 I don't know
00:57:16.860 if, was
00:57:18.120 that whole
00:57:18.540 domino theory
00:57:19.440 of communism
00:57:20.200 ever real?
00:57:21.680 I don't know.
00:57:22.880 Maybe that
00:57:23.340 was never
00:57:23.660 real.
00:57:25.320 Was Black
00:57:26.220 Lives Matter
00:57:26.760 ever real?
00:57:27.420 I don't know.
00:57:28.600 Now take
00:57:29.080 my specific
00:57:30.020 situation.
00:57:32.640 If we
00:57:33.400 were not
00:57:33.820 under the
00:57:34.580 larger
00:57:35.180 threat of
00:57:36.440 all that
00:57:36.860 white
00:57:37.160 supremacy,
00:57:38.200 do you
00:57:38.720 think I
00:57:39.040 would have
00:57:39.220 been
00:57:39.380 cancelled?
00:57:41.520 Except for
00:57:42.220 the larger
00:57:43.120 threat of
00:57:43.680 white
00:57:43.920 supremacy?
00:57:45.360 Well, I
00:57:45.720 don't know.
00:57:46.400 It's an
00:57:46.700 open question.
00:57:48.120 So there's
00:57:48.840 a whole bunch
00:57:49.340 of things
00:57:49.640 you can do
00:57:50.300 once you
00:57:51.100 create the
00:57:51.660 general
00:57:52.300 umbrella
00:57:52.880 fear,
00:57:53.900 you can
00:57:54.280 take care
00:57:54.680 of any
00:57:55.060 individual
00:57:55.540 under that
00:57:56.180 umbrella.
00:57:57.320 And I
00:57:57.600 just happened
00:57:57.960 to be under
00:57:58.380 one of the
00:57:58.880 umbrellas that
00:57:59.540 they created.
00:58:00.560 So as long
00:58:01.280 as I was
00:58:01.660 under one
00:58:02.220 of the
00:58:02.500 umbrellas,
00:58:03.080 they could
00:58:03.320 take me
00:58:03.700 out.
00:58:04.580 And it
00:58:05.860 just happened
00:58:06.220 to be that
00:58:06.560 one.
00:58:08.900 By the
00:58:09.500 way, how
00:58:10.600 much media
00:58:11.340 brainwashing
00:58:12.020 does it
00:58:12.500 take to
00:58:13.820 cancel
00:58:14.200 somebody for
00:58:15.100 complaining
00:58:15.680 that people
00:58:17.240 are racist
00:58:17.900 against him?
00:58:19.440 You know
00:58:20.120 that's why I
00:58:20.580 got cancelled,
00:58:21.140 right?
00:58:21.960 I got cancelled
00:58:22.720 for saying that
00:58:23.560 the country is
00:58:24.460 training black
00:58:25.260 people to be
00:58:26.000 racist against
00:58:26.780 people like
00:58:27.320 me.
00:58:28.120 Is that the
00:58:28.940 fault of black
00:58:29.500 people?
00:58:30.380 No.
00:58:31.480 No.
00:58:32.020 And I
00:58:32.320 never said
00:58:32.720 it was.
00:58:34.020 I said
00:58:34.520 if you're
00:58:35.460 training any
00:58:35.960 group of
00:58:36.380 Americans to
00:58:37.040 be against
00:58:37.480 me, I
00:58:38.500 want to get
00:58:38.840 away from
00:58:39.200 those people.
00:58:40.400 It has
00:58:40.920 nothing to
00:58:41.340 do with
00:58:41.740 any race.
00:58:42.880 It has to
00:58:43.260 do with the
00:58:43.560 people training
00:58:44.200 them, which
00:58:45.080 is largely
00:58:45.640 batshit crazy
00:58:46.440 women.
00:58:47.660 So batshit
00:58:48.280 crazy women
00:58:49.020 are the first
00:58:49.940 ones who
00:58:50.300 believe the
00:58:50.780 news.
00:58:52.640 They believe
00:58:53.440 the climate
00:58:53.860 change risk.
00:58:54.680 They believe
00:58:55.080 the white
00:58:55.560 supremacists
00:58:56.200 under the
00:58:57.560 beds.
00:58:58.140 They believe
00:58:58.700 basically
00:59:00.220 everything.
00:59:01.820 I think
00:59:02.640 once you
00:59:03.020 get that
00:59:03.320 group worked
00:59:03.960 up and
00:59:04.980 they believe
00:59:05.440 every risk,
00:59:06.520 it's okay
00:59:08.120 as long as
00:59:08.700 they're not
00:59:08.980 in charge.
00:59:10.500 But you
00:59:11.220 know what
00:59:11.460 changed
00:59:11.820 recently?
00:59:12.940 A whole
00:59:13.880 bunch of
00:59:14.460 batshit crazy
00:59:15.360 women in
00:59:16.020 important jobs
00:59:16.840 like judges
00:59:17.640 and representatives
00:59:18.600 and mayors
00:59:19.540 and attorney
00:59:21.220 generals and
00:59:21.840 stuff.
00:59:23.180 And then
00:59:23.700 they're dangerous
00:59:24.360 because they
00:59:25.600 are a group
00:59:26.120 they are least
00:59:27.160 capable citizens
00:59:28.240 for protecting
00:59:29.680 us.
00:59:31.040 They seem
00:59:31.860 to have some
00:59:32.320 kind of natural
00:59:32.920 impulse, the
00:59:33.640 crazy, the
00:59:34.660 batshit crazy
00:59:35.440 mostly white
00:59:36.440 women.
00:59:37.140 They seem to
00:59:37.920 have some
00:59:38.200 natural impulse
00:59:38.980 for empathy
00:59:39.900 but without
00:59:41.240 the analytical
00:59:42.120 ability to
00:59:43.140 know that
00:59:43.740 their short
00:59:44.240 term actions
00:59:44.880 will destroy
00:59:45.560 us in the
00:59:46.020 end.
00:59:47.020 I believe
00:59:47.820 that men
00:59:48.260 are more
00:59:48.680 self-defense
00:59:49.500 oriented and
00:59:51.420 would look at
00:59:51.980 the border and
00:59:52.580 say, well,
00:59:53.860 close that.
00:59:54.540 And then
00:59:55.960 the batshit
00:59:56.440 crazy woman
00:59:57.100 would say,
00:59:57.880 well, but
00:59:58.680 everybody, it's
01:00:01.000 a country of
01:00:01.700 immigrants and
01:00:02.620 they built this
01:00:03.680 country, right?
01:00:06.040 And then
01:00:06.440 every single
01:00:07.160 man would
01:00:07.680 look at it
01:00:08.180 and say,
01:00:09.020 okay, but
01:00:09.440 do you see
01:00:09.940 all these
01:00:10.540 military-age
01:00:12.600 men coming
01:00:13.320 across the
01:00:13.820 border?
01:00:14.560 Just close
01:00:15.480 that.
01:00:16.180 Just stop
01:00:16.640 that.
01:00:18.000 You have
01:00:18.900 to be
01:00:19.300 batshit
01:00:19.860 crazy to
01:00:21.700 not want
01:00:22.120 to stop
01:00:22.740 the border
01:00:23.160 stuff.
01:00:24.600 There is
01:00:25.460 no rational
01:00:26.300 argument for
01:00:27.180 it, right?
01:00:28.380 It's
01:00:28.660 batshit
01:00:29.540 crazy.
01:00:30.940 Now, you
01:00:31.300 say, but
01:00:31.960 Scott, it's
01:00:32.500 not crazy
01:00:33.140 because it's
01:00:33.920 their plan
01:00:34.540 to change
01:00:35.820 the census
01:00:36.340 and get
01:00:36.820 more stuff.
01:00:37.780 No, it's
01:00:38.700 only the plan
01:00:39.460 of a few
01:00:39.960 people in
01:00:40.460 charge, maybe.
01:00:42.760 But for
01:00:43.440 that plan
01:00:43.960 to work,
01:00:44.960 they have
01:00:45.320 to scare
01:00:45.980 or confuse
01:00:47.620 or brainwash
01:00:48.740 batshit
01:00:49.820 crazy white
01:00:50.580 women until
01:00:51.820 the men in
01:00:52.820 the Democrat
01:00:53.340 Party are
01:00:54.120 too afraid
01:00:54.600 to say
01:00:54.940 anything to
01:00:55.400 them, because
01:00:56.500 we're all
01:00:57.440 afraid of
01:00:57.840 batshit
01:00:58.160 crazy white
01:00:59.100 women, and
01:01:00.680 then they
01:01:02.160 get too
01:01:02.460 much power.
01:01:06.020 It's sort
01:01:06.720 of like,
01:01:07.940 suppose society
01:01:09.200 decided that
01:01:09.920 most babysitters
01:01:10.960 should be
01:01:11.540 men.
01:01:13.180 What would
01:01:13.880 happen?
01:01:15.340 Most
01:01:15.640 babysitters
01:01:16.360 should be
01:01:16.820 men.
01:01:17.040 Well, in
01:01:18.500 most cases,
01:01:19.460 it would be
01:01:19.720 perfectly fine.
01:01:21.440 Most men
01:01:22.300 would just be
01:01:23.640 perfectly good
01:01:24.280 babysitters.
01:01:25.480 It might even
01:01:26.020 be better in
01:01:26.580 some cases,
01:01:27.580 right?
01:01:28.220 But wouldn't
01:01:29.680 you know for
01:01:30.380 sure that the
01:01:31.760 number of
01:01:32.600 horrible things
01:01:33.740 would go up?
01:01:35.780 Is there
01:01:36.120 anybody who
01:01:36.540 doesn't think
01:01:37.020 so?
01:01:37.940 There's not
01:01:38.500 one person who
01:01:39.200 doesn't agree
01:01:39.700 with me.
01:01:40.160 Not one.
01:01:41.200 Every single
01:01:41.940 person listening
01:01:42.560 knows that if
01:01:43.660 we change to
01:01:44.400 a mostly male
01:01:45.960 babysitting,
01:01:46.820 situation,
01:01:48.500 the crime
01:01:50.740 would go
01:01:51.060 through the
01:01:51.560 roof.
01:01:52.940 You all
01:01:53.360 know that.
01:01:54.660 But the
01:01:55.320 reverse is
01:01:55.920 true, too.
01:01:56.900 If you put
01:01:57.680 women in
01:01:58.400 charge of
01:01:58.940 physical
01:01:59.400 security,
01:02:00.280 you're
01:02:01.120 dead.
01:02:02.780 That's it.
01:02:04.280 Now, for the
01:02:04.880 dumb people,
01:02:05.920 give me a
01:02:07.420 moment to let
01:02:08.040 the dumb
01:02:08.340 people catch
01:02:08.820 up.
01:02:09.560 Once again,
01:02:10.300 it does not
01:02:10.920 mean that
01:02:11.480 every single
01:02:12.120 woman in
01:02:12.720 the world
01:02:13.280 could not
01:02:14.180 be a
01:02:14.480 police
01:02:14.760 officer or
01:02:15.640 a judge
01:02:16.380 and not
01:02:17.300 do a good
01:02:17.700 job.
01:02:18.180 Now, it
01:02:18.440 doesn't mean
01:02:18.780 that because
01:02:19.240 individuals are
01:02:20.060 infinitely different.
01:02:21.380 But we do
01:02:22.100 know that if
01:02:22.760 you made
01:02:23.060 all babysitters
01:02:23.900 men, there
01:02:24.520 would be a
01:02:24.800 lot of baby
01:02:25.300 raping going
01:02:25.920 on.
01:02:26.420 And we do
01:02:27.020 know that if
01:02:27.520 you put
01:02:27.840 batshit crazy
01:02:28.840 white women
01:02:29.420 in charge of
01:02:29.980 physical security,
01:02:31.220 you're
01:02:31.680 fucking dead.
01:02:33.460 You are
01:02:34.120 fucking dead.
01:02:35.420 And the
01:02:38.660 reason we
01:02:39.060 don't is
01:02:39.460 we're afraid
01:02:39.880 of batshit
01:02:40.380 crazy women
01:02:41.020 because you
01:02:41.880 just can't
01:02:42.280 say it out
01:02:42.640 loud.
01:02:43.940 But I
01:02:44.520 can.
01:02:46.280 That's why
01:02:46.840 I'm here.
01:02:48.780 Because when
01:02:49.360 they canceled
01:02:49.860 me, they
01:02:50.240 made me
01:02:50.560 more powerful.
01:02:54.120 More siloed,
01:02:55.640 but a lot
01:02:56.260 more powerful.
01:02:58.820 And I get
01:02:59.520 to say what
01:03:00.000 you can't
01:03:00.460 say.
01:03:01.760 Now, the
01:03:02.320 reason that
01:03:02.940 James Carville
01:03:04.400 can say what
01:03:05.080 I said in
01:03:05.700 his own
01:03:06.160 James Carville
01:03:07.140 way, the
01:03:08.060 reason he
01:03:08.440 can say it
01:03:09.060 is that he's
01:03:10.560 100 years
01:03:11.160 old and near
01:03:11.700 death and
01:03:12.120 he doesn't
01:03:12.460 give a fuck
01:03:12.920 what you
01:03:13.240 think.
01:03:14.820 That's why
01:03:15.380 he can say
01:03:15.840 it.
01:03:16.340 So he's
01:03:16.780 also in
01:03:17.280 this weird,
01:03:17.860 weird, strange
01:03:18.700 place where
01:03:19.840 he can just
01:03:20.300 say shit
01:03:21.260 because he's
01:03:21.900 an old man.
01:03:23.760 And I got
01:03:24.880 that going
01:03:25.260 for me too.
01:03:27.060 Now, do
01:03:27.720 you know that
01:03:28.160 not a single
01:03:28.800 person has
01:03:29.500 pushed back
01:03:30.060 on me in
01:03:31.660 months of
01:03:33.340 me saying in
01:03:33.980 public that
01:03:34.700 the big
01:03:35.060 problem is
01:03:35.840 batshit
01:03:36.300 crazy white
01:03:36.960 women?
01:03:38.900 No pushback.
01:03:41.260 No pushback.
01:03:42.500 Do you know
01:03:42.820 why?
01:03:43.380 You all
01:03:44.220 know it.
01:03:46.500 You all
01:03:47.280 know it.
01:03:48.420 We all
01:03:49.020 know it.
01:03:50.800 And you
01:03:51.880 can't let the
01:03:52.460 people who
01:03:53.080 can't figure
01:03:53.640 out why
01:03:54.180 DEI doesn't
01:03:55.140 work, that's
01:03:57.040 just a logic
01:03:57.660 problem.
01:03:58.340 It's like a
01:03:58.840 supply and
01:03:59.400 demand problem.
01:04:00.320 You can't let
01:04:00.980 those people be
01:04:01.620 in charge.
01:04:02.240 If you
01:04:03.280 can't solve
01:04:04.180 why DEI
01:04:05.180 is only
01:04:05.920 bad and
01:04:06.940 never good
01:04:07.780 at all,
01:04:08.860 if that's
01:04:09.300 not obvious
01:04:09.960 to you
01:04:10.420 based on
01:04:11.240 your education
01:04:12.100 and your
01:04:12.480 experience,
01:04:13.680 my God,
01:04:14.320 you shouldn't
01:04:14.660 be in
01:04:14.960 charge.
01:04:15.320 So, speaking
01:04:21.520 of that,
01:04:23.480 North Korea
01:04:24.080 says there's
01:04:27.020 a proposition
01:04:27.600 from Japan's
01:04:29.720 prime minister
01:04:30.240 to have a
01:04:31.080 summit with
01:04:31.760 Kim Jong-un.
01:04:33.100 That would be
01:04:33.860 kind of a
01:04:34.360 really big
01:04:34.780 deal if
01:04:36.400 Japan and
01:04:36.960 North Korea
01:04:37.500 decided to
01:04:38.180 get along,
01:04:38.640 because their
01:04:39.100 history is
01:04:39.740 really bad.
01:04:41.740 So, that's
01:04:44.000 a step in
01:04:44.500 the right
01:04:44.680 direction.
01:04:45.940 Would you
01:04:46.760 agree that
01:04:47.420 Trump solved
01:04:48.520 North Korea?
01:04:51.120 Have you
01:04:51.480 noticed we
01:04:51.960 haven't really
01:04:52.660 had a, like
01:04:53.460 they've been
01:04:53.880 testing some
01:04:54.480 missiles, but
01:04:56.040 we don't worry
01:04:56.680 about it,
01:04:57.100 because we
01:04:57.440 never gave
01:04:58.380 them a reason
01:04:58.900 to send the
01:04:59.520 missile our
01:04:59.920 way.
01:05:00.680 We just
01:05:01.340 don't give
01:05:01.700 them any
01:05:02.020 reason.
01:05:03.160 And Trump
01:05:03.580 did that.
01:05:04.520 He basically
01:05:05.040 took away the
01:05:05.680 reason.
01:05:07.260 How about we
01:05:07.780 just be
01:05:08.100 friends?
01:05:10.100 And Kim
01:05:10.420 Jong-un
01:05:10.840 is over
01:05:11.220 there thinking,
01:05:12.380 well, yeah,
01:05:13.640 why wouldn't
01:05:14.260 we be?
01:05:16.140 So, I
01:05:16.920 think the
01:05:17.280 Japan move
01:05:17.980 is probably
01:05:18.440 just, you
01:05:19.000 know, sort
01:05:19.480 of a classic
01:05:20.880 Japanese
01:05:21.880 cautious, wait
01:05:23.680 a few years,
01:05:24.360 see what
01:05:24.620 happens, and
01:05:25.300 now it's
01:05:25.680 time to
01:05:26.000 make a
01:05:26.300 move.
01:05:27.120 And I
01:05:27.440 think this
01:05:27.800 is probably
01:05:28.240 a continuation
01:05:28.940 of Trump's
01:05:31.060 reframing
01:05:32.260 North Korea
01:05:32.920 as our
01:05:33.420 little buddy.
01:05:35.520 Right?
01:05:36.260 He literally
01:05:37.020 reframed
01:05:37.820 North Korea
01:05:38.760 as our
01:05:39.480 little friend.
01:05:40.840 And then
01:05:41.500 we stopped
01:05:42.040 worrying about
01:05:42.500 them.
01:05:43.060 That's all
01:05:43.420 it took.
01:05:44.940 And Japan's
01:05:45.840 pushing that
01:05:46.300 a little
01:05:46.480 further.
01:05:47.060 Good.
01:05:47.540 Good for
01:05:47.900 them.
01:05:49.940 Axios had
01:05:50.600 an interesting
01:05:51.960 article about
01:05:52.700 all the
01:05:53.100 bubbles that
01:05:53.740 have formed.
01:05:54.380 So, these
01:05:54.680 are groups
01:05:55.260 of people
01:05:55.700 who are
01:05:56.540 mostly talking
01:05:57.240 to themselves
01:05:57.880 or their
01:05:58.420 little power
01:05:58.920 groups.
01:05:59.740 Now, it
01:06:00.180 mentioned some
01:06:01.040 left-leaning
01:06:02.140 bubbles as well,
01:06:03.060 but they
01:06:03.300 weren't very
01:06:03.840 interesting.
01:06:04.880 I'll just
01:06:05.340 tell you the
01:06:05.840 right-leaning
01:06:06.540 bubbles the
01:06:07.680 way Axios
01:06:08.420 sees it.
01:06:09.520 Now, what's
01:06:10.060 interesting about
01:06:10.760 this is the
01:06:11.620 way they
01:06:12.380 see it.
01:06:13.820 Because I
01:06:14.380 want to see
01:06:14.680 if it's the
01:06:14.980 way you
01:06:15.280 see it.
01:06:15.980 Because I
01:06:16.400 don't think
01:06:16.700 the left
01:06:17.200 understands
01:06:18.540 anything about
01:06:19.280 the right.
01:06:20.640 It might be
01:06:21.520 true the
01:06:21.920 other way,
01:06:22.960 that the
01:06:23.300 right doesn't
01:06:23.800 really understand
01:06:24.440 the left,
01:06:25.360 but I don't
01:06:25.840 feel it.
01:06:27.240 I feel like
01:06:27.920 the right
01:06:29.140 completely
01:06:29.800 understands the
01:06:30.580 left, but I
01:06:32.240 might have
01:06:32.600 cognitive dissonance
01:06:33.660 about that.
01:06:34.760 I don't have
01:06:35.400 confidence in
01:06:36.100 that.
01:06:36.320 It just feels
01:06:36.780 that way.
01:06:37.860 Now, I
01:06:38.380 say that
01:06:38.760 because the
01:06:39.340 right sees
01:06:40.660 their own
01:06:41.040 news, plus
01:06:41.760 they almost
01:06:42.400 always see
01:06:42.940 all of the
01:06:43.460 news on
01:06:44.020 the left
01:06:44.400 because it's
01:06:44.860 the dominant
01:06:45.420 news source.
01:06:47.760 But it
01:06:48.320 doesn't work
01:06:48.720 the other
01:06:48.960 way.
01:06:50.140 So here's
01:06:50.780 what Axios
01:06:51.240 says is the
01:06:52.200 bubbles.
01:06:52.720 The quote
01:06:53.140 musketeers.
01:06:55.160 So these
01:06:55.880 are sort
01:06:56.660 of musk
01:06:57.500 liking people,
01:06:59.360 I guess.
01:07:00.420 And they
01:07:01.020 say this is
01:07:01.500 a fast-growing
01:07:02.200 mostly male
01:07:02.880 group who
01:07:03.920 feed off
01:07:04.400 Twitter.
01:07:05.280 Come on.
01:07:06.040 Axios, you
01:07:10.500 have
01:07:10.720 editors.
01:07:12.380 Am I
01:07:13.080 right?
01:07:14.380 A brand
01:07:14.820 new article,
01:07:15.900 you have
01:07:16.780 editors, and
01:07:18.300 they're calling
01:07:18.780 X Twitter?
01:07:20.920 Literally?
01:07:22.280 The writer
01:07:23.040 didn't notice
01:07:23.640 that that was
01:07:24.080 wrong, and
01:07:24.660 the editor
01:07:25.260 didn't catch
01:07:25.780 it?
01:07:26.680 How in the
01:07:27.440 world?
01:07:28.340 Anyway, so
01:07:30.560 it says a
01:07:31.600 fast-growing
01:07:32.140 mostly male
01:07:32.920 group of
01:07:33.500 podcasters
01:07:34.300 and Twitter
01:07:34.960 users, it
01:07:35.620 says, especially
01:07:37.360 the all-in
01:07:38.160 group and
01:07:39.320 Joe Rogan, and
01:07:40.640 they follow
01:07:41.060 independent
01:07:41.440 reporters led
01:07:42.220 by Barry
01:07:42.740 Weiss through
01:07:44.080 social media or
01:07:44.980 newsletters.
01:07:46.140 Would you
01:07:47.100 agree that
01:07:47.760 that is a
01:07:48.780 category?
01:07:50.380 Does that
01:07:50.760 sound like a
01:07:51.280 bubble to
01:07:51.680 you?
01:07:53.380 A little
01:07:54.020 bit.
01:07:54.840 A little
01:07:55.260 bit.
01:07:55.600 I'll give
01:07:55.960 them that
01:07:56.160 one.
01:07:57.260 I'm not
01:07:57.940 sure what
01:07:58.280 the specific
01:07:59.460 names that
01:08:00.100 they put
01:08:00.420 there, or
01:08:02.860 maybe not
01:08:03.440 as representative
01:08:04.220 as they
01:08:04.600 could be, but
01:08:05.240 basic idea.
01:08:06.440 Yeah, there's
01:08:07.040 definitely a
01:08:07.820 group of
01:08:08.960 people who
01:08:09.460 would agree
01:08:10.060 with Musk,
01:08:10.840 but what
01:08:11.380 would be a
01:08:11.820 better way to
01:08:12.440 describe that
01:08:13.200 group?
01:08:14.980 If you were
01:08:15.640 going to
01:08:15.820 describe them
01:08:16.540 in a way
01:08:16.960 that wasn't,
01:08:17.860 oh, let's
01:08:18.360 say, biased,
01:08:19.540 how would
01:08:20.480 you describe
01:08:20.960 that group?
01:08:21.380 The all-in
01:08:21.880 podcast, Joe
01:08:22.960 Rogan, and
01:08:24.240 the people,
01:08:24.960 Barry Weiss,
01:08:25.700 and people who
01:08:26.160 follow Musk?
01:08:28.560 What do they
01:08:29.160 have in
01:08:29.460 common?
01:08:30.420 I'll tell
01:08:33.080 you what
01:08:33.340 they have
01:08:33.600 in common.
01:08:35.680 They're all
01:08:36.380 moderates.
01:08:38.580 They're all
01:08:39.200 moderates.
01:08:40.160 Why wouldn't
01:08:40.600 you call
01:08:40.960 this the
01:08:41.480 moderate
01:08:41.920 people who
01:08:42.580 are not
01:08:43.000 batshit
01:08:43.460 crazy?
01:08:44.540 Do you
01:08:44.760 know what
01:08:44.980 the all-in
01:08:45.620 pod has
01:08:46.240 in common?
01:08:48.560 It's not
01:08:49.240 their love
01:08:49.720 for Elon
01:08:50.220 Musk, although
01:08:51.340 they obviously
01:08:52.340 like him.
01:08:53.580 No, what
01:08:54.040 they have in
01:08:54.460 common is
01:08:55.040 they're smart
01:08:55.920 people who
01:08:56.620 don't have
01:08:57.100 crazy opinions
01:08:58.120 about anything.
01:08:59.260 You could
01:08:59.620 disagree with
01:09:00.200 them, but
01:09:01.300 they show
01:09:01.660 their work
01:09:02.120 and none
01:09:02.480 of it's
01:09:02.720 crazy.
01:09:03.940 What does
01:09:04.260 Elon Musk
01:09:04.920 have that
01:09:07.280 makes him
01:09:07.720 sort of
01:09:08.080 different in
01:09:08.600 politics?
01:09:09.920 Well, he
01:09:10.280 listed his
01:09:10.960 views the
01:09:11.420 other day
01:09:11.860 and they're
01:09:12.380 completely
01:09:12.880 middle of
01:09:13.360 the road.
01:09:14.740 Stuff like
01:09:15.660 don't do
01:09:18.560 gender
01:09:19.020 surgery on
01:09:19.740 minors.
01:09:21.040 That happens
01:09:22.000 to be the
01:09:22.440 dominant
01:09:22.800 American view.
01:09:23.680 immigration
01:09:26.200 should be
01:09:27.020 controlled,
01:09:27.720 etc.
01:09:28.060 These are
01:09:28.600 the most
01:09:29.020 common
01:09:30.000 dominant
01:09:31.360 American
01:09:32.040 views.
01:09:33.560 Instead of
01:09:34.200 saying there's
01:09:34.820 a bubble
01:09:35.820 of people
01:09:36.480 who have
01:09:37.640 real high
01:09:38.180 common
01:09:38.500 sense,
01:09:39.640 and hold
01:09:39.960 on,
01:09:41.020 who else
01:09:41.520 follows
01:09:41.900 Musk?
01:09:43.560 High IQ
01:09:44.220 people.
01:09:46.140 Am I
01:09:46.520 right?
01:09:47.480 The all-in
01:09:48.060 podcast, if
01:09:48.840 you added up
01:09:49.420 their four
01:09:50.120 IQs, it's
01:09:50.820 like a
01:09:51.340 thousand.
01:09:53.760 Like the
01:09:54.340 smartest
01:09:54.600 people in
01:09:55.360 one podcast
01:09:56.100 ever.
01:09:57.300 And, you
01:09:58.160 know, then
01:09:58.540 there's
01:09:59.100 Elon Musk.
01:10:00.280 And then
01:10:00.580 name the
01:10:01.640 other people
01:10:02.180 who are
01:10:02.660 well-known
01:10:04.360 for, let's
01:10:05.680 say, interacting
01:10:06.420 in his
01:10:06.980 circle of
01:10:07.880 social media.
01:10:10.080 They're all
01:10:10.840 the dominant
01:10:11.920 ones are
01:10:13.700 not just
01:10:14.280 average.
01:10:15.660 They are the
01:10:16.600 smartest
01:10:17.100 podcasters
01:10:18.140 by far.
01:10:19.440 Now, I'm
01:10:19.680 going to
01:10:19.840 throw a
01:10:20.700 Joe Rogan
01:10:21.180 in the
01:10:21.640 smartest
01:10:22.020 podcasters.
01:10:23.340 Because I've
01:10:23.920 said for
01:10:24.220 years, one
01:10:24.700 of the
01:10:24.920 smartest
01:10:25.220 things that
01:10:25.780 Joe Rogan
01:10:26.240 does is
01:10:27.660 he presents
01:10:28.480 himself as
01:10:29.200 a person
01:10:30.080 who's not
01:10:30.480 as smart
01:10:30.860 as he
01:10:31.140 actually is
01:10:31.780 because he's
01:10:32.700 super smart.
01:10:35.120 But he
01:10:35.820 has that
01:10:36.260 common
01:10:36.660 touch where
01:10:37.620 he can
01:10:37.920 relate to
01:10:38.760 people across
01:10:39.340 all different
01:10:39.780 barriers.
01:10:40.880 So, you
01:10:42.960 could have
01:10:43.400 said, these
01:10:44.660 are the
01:10:45.040 smartest
01:10:45.840 moderates
01:10:46.600 in politics.
01:10:48.420 Am I
01:10:49.080 right?
01:10:49.300 Would
01:10:50.920 that be
01:10:51.780 inaccurate?
01:10:53.720 Yeah, Jordan
01:10:54.400 Peterson.
01:10:55.460 The people
01:10:56.540 who are the
01:10:57.180 musketeers, as
01:10:58.220 they call
01:10:58.600 them, to
01:10:59.020 try to find
01:10:59.580 a way to
01:10:59.900 make it
01:11:00.180 sound bad,
01:11:00.980 are the
01:11:02.080 smartest, best
01:11:03.480 people.
01:11:03.980 How about
01:11:04.260 the one
01:11:04.740 independent
01:11:06.080 reporter, Barry
01:11:07.400 Weiss?
01:11:08.740 One of the
01:11:09.440 best.
01:11:10.640 They don't
01:11:11.100 mention that?
01:11:12.400 Why don't you
01:11:12.740 mention that the
01:11:13.440 one reporter is
01:11:14.240 like a
01:11:15.260 superstar among
01:11:16.140 the reporters?
01:11:16.640 Yeah.
01:11:19.360 Here's the
01:11:19.880 other category.
01:11:21.040 The MAGA
01:11:21.680 mind melders.
01:11:23.100 Okay, the
01:11:23.500 fact that
01:11:23.900 they're going
01:11:24.740 to use MAGA
01:11:25.380 in that at
01:11:25.920 all is,
01:11:27.240 you know,
01:11:27.480 already you
01:11:28.340 know what's
01:11:28.660 coming, right?
01:11:30.060 The new
01:11:30.480 conservative
01:11:30.920 ecosystem would
01:11:32.600 seem like a
01:11:33.200 distant planet
01:11:33.980 to anyone whose
01:11:35.220 habits were
01:11:35.720 formed pre-Trump.
01:11:37.460 And here are
01:11:37.880 the names that
01:11:38.540 they put in
01:11:38.960 this category.
01:11:40.200 People like,
01:11:42.300 now they're
01:11:42.900 going to name
01:11:43.280 some people,
01:11:44.280 and they're
01:11:44.620 going to say
01:11:45.020 people like
01:11:45.760 them.
01:11:48.080 That's such
01:11:48.760 a Democrat
01:11:49.240 thing to do
01:11:49.980 because there's
01:11:52.080 nobody like
01:11:52.900 any of the
01:11:53.420 people that
01:11:53.860 they're going
01:11:54.120 to mention,
01:11:55.440 right?
01:11:55.660 So they
01:11:55.940 start out
01:11:56.320 with people
01:11:57.140 like Charlie
01:11:57.960 Kirk.
01:11:58.740 Well, who's
01:11:59.380 the other
01:11:59.700 Charlie Kirk?
01:12:01.400 Come on.
01:12:03.280 He's pretty
01:12:04.100 unique.
01:12:05.160 Like, like
01:12:05.940 him or not,
01:12:08.060 he's kind
01:12:08.860 of unique.
01:12:10.380 And the
01:12:11.380 others are
01:12:11.800 as well.
01:12:12.480 They mentioned
01:12:12.940 Jack Posobiec
01:12:13.760 and Mike
01:12:15.300 Cernovich.
01:12:19.540 Is Mike
01:12:20.380 Cernovich
01:12:20.820 MAGA?
01:12:23.840 I think
01:12:24.700 Mike Cernovich
01:12:25.220 is just one
01:12:25.960 of the
01:12:26.180 smartest people
01:12:26.900 who can
01:12:27.400 see the
01:12:27.740 whole field.
01:12:30.540 To throw
01:12:31.540 Cernovich in
01:12:32.380 with a, you
01:12:33.560 know, a
01:12:33.880 cult,
01:12:34.360 basically,
01:12:34.940 that's not
01:12:36.040 fair.
01:12:36.640 And it also
01:12:37.100 doesn't understand
01:12:38.180 him, right?
01:12:39.140 It's a complete
01:12:40.260 lack of
01:12:40.680 understanding.
01:12:41.120 They also
01:12:42.300 mention Laura
01:12:43.360 Loomer, Alex
01:12:44.480 Bruzwitz, never
01:12:45.680 heard of him,
01:12:46.980 Tucker Carlson,
01:12:48.240 Don Jr.
01:12:50.080 Does that
01:12:50.680 seem like,
01:12:52.220 yeah, that's
01:12:52.720 a pretty good
01:12:53.180 grouping.
01:12:53.980 I mean, I
01:12:54.460 can see why
01:12:55.360 they would
01:12:55.700 group them
01:12:56.560 as like-minded
01:12:57.840 in many ways.
01:13:00.140 But what
01:13:00.580 would be
01:13:00.940 another way
01:13:01.640 to describe
01:13:02.320 this group
01:13:03.020 of people?
01:13:06.240 How about
01:13:07.120 open-minded,
01:13:09.440 super-smart,
01:13:12.900 well-informed,
01:13:14.600 red-pilled,
01:13:16.100 usually-right?
01:13:19.180 How about
01:13:19.520 usually-right?
01:13:21.280 I mean, there's
01:13:21.680 a lot you
01:13:22.060 could say
01:13:22.360 about this
01:13:22.800 group, but
01:13:24.620 they decide
01:13:25.900 to make it
01:13:26.480 mega-mind-melders
01:13:27.780 like they're,
01:13:29.900 I don't know
01:13:30.460 what the
01:13:30.700 mind-melder
01:13:31.260 part is.
01:13:31.780 And they
01:13:37.100 talk about
01:13:38.080 Breitbart
01:13:38.940 and Steve
01:13:39.600 Bannon's
01:13:39.960 War Room.
01:13:40.920 And then they
01:13:41.580 talk about
01:13:41.980 Rush Limbaugh
01:13:42.660 grandpas,
01:13:43.660 you know,
01:13:43.880 grandpas who
01:13:44.540 would have
01:13:44.880 been watching
01:13:45.400 Rush Limbaugh
01:13:46.420 if he was
01:13:46.760 still around.
01:13:48.140 Now, I
01:13:49.720 wasn't
01:13:49.980 mentioned.
01:13:51.500 Which
01:13:52.020 category am
01:13:52.680 I in?
01:13:55.460 Am I a
01:13:56.680 musketeer,
01:13:58.520 a mega-mind-melder,
01:13:59.920 a
01:14:01.780 or Rush
01:14:03.240 Limbaugh
01:14:03.680 grandpa?
01:14:05.800 All of the
01:14:06.660 above.
01:14:07.960 All of the
01:14:08.500 above.
01:14:09.240 Yeah.
01:14:09.620 The trouble
01:14:10.100 is that I
01:14:11.760 do think
01:14:12.180 categories are
01:14:13.080 sort of useful
01:14:13.860 for understanding
01:14:14.580 things, but as
01:14:15.540 soon as you
01:14:16.000 say a person's
01:14:16.960 in a category,
01:14:17.940 you're really
01:14:18.920 minimizing the
01:14:20.660 individuality of
01:14:21.740 that person.
01:14:23.220 I like to
01:14:24.300 think I could
01:14:24.780 be in any
01:14:25.360 category at
01:14:26.240 any given
01:14:26.720 time based
01:14:27.320 on the
01:14:27.640 topic.
01:14:29.000 Do you
01:14:29.380 know what
01:14:29.600 Democrats don't
01:14:30.500 want to
01:14:30.900 allow is a
01:14:31.700 possibility
01:14:32.240 that people
01:14:33.780 could make
01:14:34.200 decisions based
01:14:35.120 on the
01:14:35.620 facts instead
01:14:37.060 of their
01:14:37.480 party
01:14:37.900 affiliation?
01:14:39.960 Ah, now
01:14:41.240 you understand
01:14:41.840 what Axios
01:14:42.580 just did
01:14:43.140 here, don't
01:14:43.600 you?
01:14:44.560 They tried
01:14:45.260 to make
01:14:45.720 being smart
01:14:47.100 political,
01:14:49.220 as in you're
01:14:50.400 just a team
01:14:50.880 player.
01:14:51.940 So they
01:14:52.220 say, instead
01:14:52.900 of saying the
01:14:54.080 smartest people
01:14:54.960 are all banding
01:14:56.160 together in
01:14:56.980 what I call
01:14:57.500 the internet
01:14:58.000 dads,
01:14:58.460 the internet
01:15:01.000 dads, they
01:15:01.940 decided to
01:15:02.500 call them
01:15:02.980 basically
01:15:03.680 Musk, you
01:15:05.620 know, cult
01:15:06.060 members or
01:15:06.620 something to
01:15:07.560 make it sound
01:15:08.120 bad.
01:15:09.080 The other
01:15:09.960 way to tell
01:15:10.540 this story is
01:15:11.600 there's a large
01:15:12.280 group of
01:15:12.700 people, many
01:15:13.820 of them who
01:15:14.500 used to vote
01:15:15.420 Democrat, who
01:15:17.400 can't buy on to
01:15:18.420 the crazy
01:15:18.940 batshit parts of
01:15:19.880 the Democrat, but
01:15:21.180 they're not full
01:15:22.080 right wingers,
01:15:23.340 they're just
01:15:24.000 looking at what
01:15:24.580 works.
01:15:25.920 So the
01:15:26.300 all-in
01:15:26.660 podcast, Joe
01:15:27.720 Rogan, Barry
01:15:28.420 Weiss, and
01:15:29.620 Musk, what
01:15:30.340 would be one
01:15:30.840 thing they all
01:15:31.340 have in common?
01:15:32.760 They'd like
01:15:33.420 border security
01:15:34.240 to be better.
01:15:36.700 So does that
01:15:37.560 make them
01:15:38.000 Musketeers?
01:15:40.960 No, it
01:15:41.660 makes them
01:15:42.060 Americans who
01:15:42.840 are paying
01:15:43.140 attention.
01:15:45.140 Like calling
01:15:45.680 them musketeers
01:15:46.560 is a way to
01:15:47.200 minimize them
01:15:48.040 as some
01:15:49.080 kind of
01:15:49.400 joiners of
01:15:50.380 some kind
01:15:50.760 of weird
01:15:51.060 cult or
01:15:51.600 something.
01:15:52.420 How about
01:15:52.900 the smartest
01:15:53.980 people in
01:15:54.600 the world
01:15:55.120 have found
01:15:56.420 each other
01:15:56.940 because that's
01:15:58.080 what happened.
01:15:59.400 The thing
01:16:00.120 that X and
01:16:01.100 Musk allowed
01:16:02.440 people to do
01:16:03.240 is for the
01:16:03.900 smart people
01:16:04.400 to find each
01:16:04.960 other.
01:16:05.920 Do you know
01:16:06.280 how I know
01:16:06.880 that the
01:16:07.400 all-in
01:16:07.760 podcast is
01:16:08.600 awesome?
01:16:09.620 Because I
01:16:10.220 found them
01:16:10.740 on X.
01:16:12.280 I wouldn't
01:16:12.540 have found
01:16:12.820 them otherwise.
01:16:13.880 Do you know
01:16:14.220 how I know
01:16:14.700 that you're
01:16:16.200 going to get
01:16:16.520 a good scoop
01:16:17.220 from Jack
01:16:17.860 Posabek and
01:16:18.780 that Tucker
01:16:20.740 is awesome?
01:16:22.240 Because I'm
01:16:22.860 on X.
01:16:23.320 X is the
01:16:24.680 way we
01:16:24.980 find each
01:16:25.660 other.
01:16:27.080 But the
01:16:27.800 dominant
01:16:28.320 thing that
01:16:29.360 keeps us
01:16:29.800 together as
01:16:31.120 an entity
01:16:31.880 that has
01:16:32.380 power is
01:16:33.960 that the
01:16:34.420 smart people
01:16:34.940 are all
01:16:35.280 on one
01:16:35.560 team.
01:16:38.720 The smart
01:16:39.440 people aren't
01:16:40.000 lying.
01:16:41.280 I look at
01:16:41.860 people like
01:16:42.280 Lawrence
01:16:42.640 Tribe, who
01:16:45.280 I would assume
01:16:45.900 could beat me
01:16:46.500 in an IQ
01:16:46.960 test.
01:16:48.160 Smart guy.
01:16:48.800 But when
01:16:50.220 you listen
01:16:50.600 to him,
01:16:51.140 you think,
01:16:51.720 oh, there's
01:16:52.540 something wrong
01:16:52.960 here.
01:16:53.960 There's
01:16:54.160 something wrong
01:16:54.520 with that
01:16:54.800 guy.
01:16:55.280 But it's
01:16:55.540 probably not
01:16:55.940 IQ.
01:16:57.260 So there's
01:16:57.860 something about
01:16:58.460 being smart
01:16:59.640 enough and
01:17:00.320 also honest
01:17:01.100 enough that
01:17:02.440 you can look
01:17:02.900 at the
01:17:03.140 costs and
01:17:03.520 the benefits
01:17:03.920 of any
01:17:04.380 situation.
01:17:05.900 So I
01:17:06.600 would
01:17:06.780 characterize it
01:17:07.840 this way.
01:17:08.400 Smart people
01:17:09.160 who are
01:17:10.100 willing to
01:17:10.640 entertain both
01:17:11.400 the costs
01:17:12.000 and the
01:17:12.540 benefits of
01:17:13.340 any important
01:17:13.920 topic are a
01:17:15.540 rare group
01:17:16.140 and there
01:17:17.280 are not
01:17:17.460 many people
01:17:17.900 who can
01:17:18.140 do it.
01:17:19.300 Do you
01:17:19.460 know what's
01:17:19.760 interesting
01:17:20.100 about the
01:17:20.540 All In
01:17:20.900 podcast is
01:17:22.600 that every
01:17:23.080 member of
01:17:23.720 the All In
01:17:24.140 podcast has
01:17:25.460 the analytical
01:17:26.160 abilities that
01:17:28.420 they can tear
01:17:29.020 apart a
01:17:29.580 complicated thing
01:17:30.420 and give you
01:17:30.940 some value
01:17:31.720 to it.
01:17:32.740 And it
01:17:33.100 won't be
01:17:33.700 some Democrat
01:17:35.100 view or even
01:17:35.780 a Republican
01:17:36.280 view.
01:17:36.780 It will be
01:17:37.120 non-political.
01:17:38.200 It will be
01:17:38.560 entirely what
01:17:39.260 works and
01:17:39.660 what doesn't.
01:17:41.120 And that,
01:17:42.400 if that's
01:17:43.420 powerful,
01:17:44.840 thank God,
01:17:45.660 if that's
01:17:48.140 like a
01:17:48.460 power center
01:17:49.180 that's
01:17:49.600 forming,
01:17:50.940 thank God
01:17:51.800 we've been
01:17:52.460 waiting for
01:17:52.880 that.
01:17:55.480 Anyway,
01:17:56.940 Mad Liberals
01:17:57.940 and Account
01:17:58.440 on X
01:17:59.160 has been
01:17:59.580 doing a lot
01:18:00.000 of work
01:18:00.280 looking for
01:18:01.280 irregularities
01:18:02.320 in that
01:18:02.600 2020 election
01:18:04.200 and has
01:18:05.440 produced a
01:18:06.000 205-page
01:18:07.720 report of
01:18:08.860 his findings
01:18:09.620 that,
01:18:11.040 in his
01:18:11.340 view,
01:18:11.740 would
01:18:12.020 substantiate
01:18:13.600 the
01:18:14.800 irregularities
01:18:15.640 of the
01:18:16.020 2020
01:18:16.540 election.
01:18:17.660 Now,
01:18:18.040 I asked
01:18:18.380 him for
01:18:18.680 a summary.
01:18:20.260 He said
01:18:20.560 a quick
01:18:20.880 summary is
01:18:21.440 that after
01:18:21.880 analyzing
01:18:22.360 over 80
01:18:23.020 counties,
01:18:24.480 he says
01:18:25.100 he found
01:18:25.620 8,000
01:18:26.280 double-scanned
01:18:27.080 ballots,
01:18:28.580 and more
01:18:31.420 than 8,000
01:18:32.260 ballots are
01:18:32.960 missing in
01:18:33.520 the recount,
01:18:35.240 and 6,000
01:18:36.180 new ballots
01:18:36.640 added to
01:18:37.020 the recount,
01:18:37.680 and over
01:18:37.940 300 test
01:18:38.620 ballots added
01:18:39.140 to the
01:18:39.360 recount,
01:18:40.540 and over
01:18:40.920 350 ballots
01:18:42.120 overwritten
01:18:42.580 ballots.
01:18:43.060 So there
01:18:44.360 were a
01:18:45.600 number of
01:18:46.200 double-scanned
01:18:47.800 and overridden
01:18:48.680 stuff.
01:18:50.820 Now,
01:18:51.580 what do I
01:18:52.760 always say
01:18:53.180 about election
01:18:53.960 irregularity
01:18:54.920 claims?
01:18:55.440 I'll say it
01:18:56.040 again.
01:18:57.180 I don't know
01:18:58.140 what's true
01:18:58.660 and what's
01:18:59.020 not,
01:18:59.680 because I
01:19:00.020 have no
01:19:00.320 way to
01:19:00.960 validate
01:19:01.560 or have
01:19:02.820 an opinion
01:19:03.180 on any
01:19:03.660 of it.
01:19:03.900 but you
01:19:09.100 should assume
01:19:09.740 that every
01:19:10.340 claim has a
01:19:12.380 95 to 100
01:19:13.360 percent chance
01:19:13.980 of being
01:19:14.360 false.
01:19:16.300 So there
01:19:18.360 might be
01:19:18.680 something here,
01:19:19.480 but it would
01:19:20.480 be the 50th
01:19:21.400 time I've
01:19:21.800 said,
01:19:22.040 oh,
01:19:22.200 there might
01:19:22.460 be something
01:19:22.800 here,
01:19:23.640 only to find
01:19:24.280 out that my
01:19:25.220 original estimate
01:19:26.180 that almost
01:19:26.860 everything would
01:19:27.520 turn out not
01:19:28.180 to pan out
01:19:29.120 so far.
01:19:31.140 So far,
01:19:31.900 most of it's
01:19:32.380 not panned
01:19:32.780 out,
01:19:32.980 but there
01:19:33.680 are a number
01:19:34.040 of things
01:19:34.400 that are,
01:19:34.780 let's say,
01:19:35.320 pending,
01:19:36.080 and this is
01:19:36.520 one of them,
01:19:37.840 that are sort
01:19:38.320 of floating out
01:19:39.020 there and
01:19:39.460 have not
01:19:39.760 been debunked.
01:19:42.780 So there is a
01:19:43.640 category of
01:19:44.300 things that
01:19:44.640 have not
01:19:44.960 been debunked,
01:19:46.020 which is
01:19:47.140 different from
01:19:47.840 proving something.
01:19:56.340 All right,
01:19:56.980 just look at
01:19:57.400 some of your
01:19:57.680 comments.
01:20:02.980 you're afraid
01:20:07.860 to say what's
01:20:08.540 true because
01:20:09.160 you're afraid
01:20:09.600 of actually
01:20:10.160 being canceled,
01:20:11.000 not fake
01:20:11.480 canceled like
01:20:12.460 you cry about.
01:20:13.660 No,
01:20:14.020 actually,
01:20:14.600 you fucking
01:20:15.000 asshole,
01:20:15.840 stop reading
01:20:16.400 my mind.
01:20:17.480 I'm actually
01:20:18.180 telling you my
01:20:18.800 actual opinion.
01:20:19.960 What you have
01:20:20.720 in your mind
01:20:21.400 is some
01:20:22.480 fucking thing
01:20:23.580 that you think
01:20:24.160 I should say
01:20:24.980 because it's
01:20:25.860 in your head
01:20:26.540 and you think
01:20:27.080 it's true.
01:20:27.520 that doesn't
01:20:28.820 mean it's
01:20:29.160 in my head.
01:20:30.800 All right?
01:20:31.620 So just
01:20:32.720 fuck off.
01:20:35.640 The only
01:20:36.420 logical
01:20:36.880 conclusion
01:20:37.400 is election
01:20:40.860 cheating.
01:20:43.540 Do you even
01:20:44.380 know what I
01:20:44.740 say about the
01:20:45.240 elections?
01:20:46.180 If our
01:20:46.900 elections are
01:20:48.140 fair, it
01:20:50.140 would be the
01:20:50.660 only institution
01:20:51.900 or system in
01:20:52.760 America that
01:20:53.420 is.
01:20:54.400 What are the
01:20:54.800 odds of that?
01:20:56.220 So I say
01:20:57.020 two things
01:20:57.560 at the same
01:20:58.060 time.
01:20:58.920 One,
01:20:59.520 any specific
01:21:00.360 claim is
01:21:01.160 almost
01:21:01.560 infinitesimally
01:21:02.580 unlikely to
01:21:03.300 be true.
01:21:04.680 Number two,
01:21:05.980 the odds
01:21:06.520 that our
01:21:06.880 elections are
01:21:07.440 not already
01:21:07.980 controlled by
01:21:08.940 our intelligence
01:21:10.420 people are
01:21:11.380 close to zero.
01:21:13.260 I don't think
01:21:13.680 there's really
01:21:14.060 any chance
01:21:14.700 that it's a
01:21:15.200 real election.
01:21:16.320 And I don't
01:21:16.700 think it has
01:21:17.100 been for decades.
01:21:19.440 Are you
01:21:20.020 happy?
01:21:21.840 Whether or
01:21:22.520 not we find
01:21:23.280 proof that
01:21:24.300 the elections
01:21:24.780 are rigged
01:21:26.040 seems
01:21:26.860 somewhat off
01:21:28.240 point because
01:21:29.660 the whole
01:21:30.080 point of
01:21:30.560 having somebody
01:21:31.120 like an
01:21:31.500 intelligence
01:21:31.940 group rig
01:21:32.700 an election
01:21:33.120 is to
01:21:34.200 not get
01:21:34.640 caught.
01:21:36.360 The not
01:21:37.140 getting caught
01:21:37.620 part is pretty
01:21:38.160 important to
01:21:38.820 the professional
01:21:39.580 work.
01:21:41.640 I'm pretty
01:21:41.980 sure they
01:21:42.320 like not
01:21:42.720 getting caught.
01:21:47.300 Punk rock
01:21:48.060 Jesus says,
01:21:48.960 Scott hates
01:21:49.640 people who
01:21:50.720 don't worship
01:21:51.260 him.
01:21:52.520 That sounds
01:21:53.200 a little bit
01:21:53.940 mind
01:21:54.500 reading.
01:21:56.820 Doesn't it?
01:21:59.780 First of
01:22:00.380 all, it's
01:22:00.680 ridiculous.
01:22:02.620 And second
01:22:03.020 of all, if
01:22:04.000 that existed,
01:22:04.840 you could only
01:22:05.400 know it by
01:22:05.900 reading my
01:22:06.420 mind, which
01:22:07.020 you can't
01:22:07.480 do.
01:22:08.380 So why
01:22:09.040 would you
01:22:09.340 read my
01:22:09.760 mind and
01:22:10.240 find something
01:22:10.800 ridiculous in
01:22:11.640 there?
01:22:12.200 Oh, let me
01:22:12.940 do it.
01:22:14.900 You like to
01:22:15.760 have sex with
01:22:16.520 kittens.
01:22:17.460 Well, I can
01:22:17.900 see it as
01:22:18.280 clear as day.
01:22:18.900 So I
01:22:20.940 guess that's
01:22:21.320 proof.
01:22:22.740 You just
01:22:23.180 hate people
01:22:23.760 who try to
01:22:24.460 stop you
01:22:24.880 from having
01:22:25.340 sex with
01:22:25.840 kittens,
01:22:26.340 don't you?
01:22:27.580 I see that
01:22:28.240 in your
01:22:28.520 brain that
01:22:28.940 I'm reading.
01:22:31.480 I'm reading
01:22:32.220 your comment
01:22:32.680 right now.
01:22:36.060 Yeah,
01:22:36.640 drinking early.
01:22:40.800 Elections
01:22:41.320 were proven
01:22:41.980 stolen.
01:22:43.260 Now,
01:22:44.060 proven means
01:22:45.020 different things
01:22:45.620 to everybody.
01:22:46.960 It wasn't
01:22:47.460 proven to me.
01:22:49.740 So do
01:22:51.400 you believe
01:22:51.680 the pandemic
01:22:52.280 was something
01:22:52.940 that was
01:22:53.500 prepared to
01:22:54.080 control us
01:22:54.600 more, but
01:22:55.760 got it earlier
01:22:56.660 to use?
01:22:57.660 I don't
01:22:58.140 believe the
01:22:58.700 pandemic was
01:22:59.960 intentional.
01:23:02.220 I believe it
01:23:03.120 got out of
01:23:03.540 a lab.
01:23:05.780 Now, there
01:23:06.440 might have
01:23:06.720 been some
01:23:07.100 opportunistic
01:23:08.180 things that
01:23:08.700 happened because
01:23:09.260 of it, but
01:23:09.840 no, it
01:23:10.320 just got
01:23:11.060 out in
01:23:13.800 all likelihood.
01:23:17.260 All right,
01:23:17.880 I'm looking
01:23:18.100 at some of
01:23:18.540 your comments
01:23:19.040 now as
01:23:20.500 I've reached
01:23:20.920 the end
01:23:21.420 of my
01:23:21.800 prepared
01:23:22.340 remarks.
01:23:23.920 All right,
01:23:24.580 thanks for
01:23:25.220 joining
01:23:25.460 everybody on
01:23:26.560 Locals and
01:23:27.880 Rumble and
01:23:29.300 the X
01:23:29.660 platform.
01:23:30.380 I'm going
01:23:30.560 to say
01:23:30.740 goodbye and
01:23:31.540 then I'm
01:23:31.980 going to
01:23:33.040 queue up a
01:23:35.040 separate
01:23:35.640 live stream
01:23:38.160 for the
01:23:38.440 locals people
01:23:39.080 to do a
01:23:40.040 little after
01:23:40.460 show action.
01:23:42.040 Thanks for
01:23:42.440 joining.
01:23:42.800 I'll see you
01:23:43.260 in the morning
01:23:43.920 tomorrow.
01:23:44.880 Less mind
01:23:46.360 reading.