Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 25, 2024


Episode 2424 CWSA 03⧸25⧸24


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 23 minutes

Words per minute

145.45758

Word count

12,186

Sentence count

828

Harmful content

Misogyny

31

sentences flagged

Toxicity

168

sentences flagged

Hate speech

61

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode: Elon Musk thinks we need a red wave to save America, string theory isn t working as physics, and the price of food is going up because of rising temperatures. Plus, a new kind of coffee.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 and everything. Well, welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of your
00:00:04.040 entire existence. If you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even
00:00:09.840 really imagine, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or
00:00:14.300 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:21.260 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. Dopamine here today thing makes everything
00:00:26.820 better. It's called the simultaneous SIP. It happens now. Thanks, Paul. You saved me.
00:00:37.860 Ah. Well, that's good stuff. I got lots of little science-y stories and news stories and
00:00:46.060 maybe a little bit of a theme. But let's start with this. Elon Musk posted that he voted 100%
00:00:54.360 Democrat until a few years ago. And now he says, now I think we need a red wave or America is toast.
00:01:03.480 That does seem to be the case. It does seem to be that the political left is so batshit crazy 0.92
00:01:11.340 that letting them have another four years would be the end of the country, potentially. It does look
00:01:18.240 like it's an existential threat. And the existential threat would be batshit crazy women, 1.00
00:01:25.280 basically. Because if we could do something about the batshit crazy women, 1.00
00:01:29.920 the rest would take care of itself. You just got to get rid of that one insane group that got too much 0.99
00:01:35.800 power and we'll be in good shape. But I think a red wave would go a long way to make that happen.
00:01:40.400 All right. Here's a post on X that had me laughing for two days because I'm mad that I didn't think
00:01:48.480 of it myself. You ever have that situation where somebody makes a good point and you think,
00:01:54.020 oh, why didn't I ever say that? That's so smart. Well, Eric Weinstein said this about a string theory.
00:02:02.560 He goes, how do you know that string theory isn't working as physics despite expert assurances to the
00:02:09.160 contrary? And he says, the answer is, no one at all is in any way worried about the Iranians,
00:02:16.740 Russians, or Chinese getting their hands on our cutting edge string theory. 1.00
00:02:26.040 So how real is string theory if we don't have any concern whatsoever if our rivals get it? Now,
00:02:35.060 that doesn't just mean maybe has some potential military value, but at the very least, if it's
00:02:42.680 going to be anything useful at all, it would have economic use. But apparently we don't think it has
00:02:50.660 any value whatsoever because we don't protect it. Now, why didn't I ever think of that?
00:02:56.320 Have you ever thought of that? That there's no security whatsoever on this brand new theory of
00:03:04.740 physics? It's probably because nobody believes it's real. Like on some level, they know it's not
00:03:10.160 worth protecting, which I think is hilarious. Well, scientists warn in Germany, I guess, that the
00:03:18.440 price of food will go up every year from now on and 3% per year. And the problem is that the rising
00:03:25.740 temperatures, the rising temperatures will make food prices go up. Can anybody explain how a little
00:03:35.100 extra warmth makes it harder to grow crops? Because I always thought that that made your crops more
00:03:44.120 abundant. Well, what are they trying to tell us here? That sounds ridiculous to me on the surface,
00:03:50.700 because we know that warming is associated with the greening. The only way this would make sense
00:03:56.460 is that it simply changes where the greenery is. So maybe there's some places that dry out,
00:04:02.740 so they get a little drought, but some other place grows better. Now let me ask you a more important
00:04:09.240 question. Do you think they could really measure this? Do you think they can measure the difference in
00:04:17.980 food growth just based on temperature? Not just the difference, but how much of the difference
00:04:24.980 depends on it being a tenth of a degree warmer this year? Do you think they have that ability? No,
00:04:31.680 they don't. No. If you lived in the real world for five minutes, you know that the last thing science
00:04:39.520 would be able to do is figure out how the crops are different because of a tenth of a degree difference
00:04:44.920 from this year to last year. They can't do that. That's not a real thing. It's like saying that
00:04:51.200 they can measure the temperature. I was going to do a little demonstration, but I got lazy.
00:04:59.440 In one of my rooms in the house that I don't heat or cool, I just keep the door closed,
00:05:07.020 I put two thermometers in there. So one's a digital thermometer and one's a mercury thermometer.
00:05:15.640 And every day I go in and check to make sure that I'm getting the right temperature.
00:05:21.600 So I use one of the temperatures to check to see if the other temperature is correct.
00:05:27.400 Because otherwise, how would I know, right? Let's say the digital one was off.
00:05:32.600 How would I know? I might just see a number. So I put right next to it the mercury one.
00:05:38.840 So if it's like off a degree, I'll catch it. Do you know what the temperature difference is
00:05:45.800 of two thermometers sitting within three inches of each other? Five degrees. Five degrees.
00:05:53.960 One of them says 55 degrees. The other says 60. They're right next to each other. So how do I know
00:06:02.440 which is right? Well, I know the digital one's not right because I checked it against the mercury one.
00:06:08.820 And I know the mercury one is not right because I checked it against the digital one.
00:06:14.860 What exactly do they use to check their temperatures when they go do the reading?
00:06:20.260 You ever wonder about that? Do you think when they go out to service the machines or to
00:06:26.820 check the numbers on them, do they bring a separate device so they can sit next to it
00:06:32.580 and then find out if they get the same reading on both devices? Do you think they do that?
00:06:38.060 Of course not. Of course not. There's no way in the world we're measuring the temperature of the earth.
00:06:43.580 It's like one of the greatest scams of all time. Now, I don't know if the temperature of the earth
00:06:49.840 is going up or down or how much people are affecting it. I'm just saying that if we think
00:06:55.000 we can measure it, you haven't lived in any kind of real world for a while if you think that.
00:07:03.940 Anyway, there's a new study on marijuana that says that daily cannabis use has a 25%
00:07:13.340 increased risk of heart attack and a 42% increased risk of stroke.
00:07:20.260 Now, just try to hold this in your head. This is a really big effect. Would you agree?
00:07:28.200 Rarely do you find a scientific study that will say there's a 25% difference in anything, right?
00:07:36.300 That's a really big difference. And that's just for one thing. There's a 42% difference in the risk of stroke.
00:07:42.500 Now, those are really big differences. Am I right? So, with differences that big,
00:07:49.480 I'll bet you've noticed it in your real life, haven't you? Haven't you noticed all the daily
00:07:55.520 marijuana smokers falling over with heart attacks and strokes? I've never heard of one.
00:08:02.600 I've never actually heard of one. But let's do another one. We hear fentanyl is bad. Do you know
00:08:09.380 anybody who died of fentanyl? Yes. Yes, I do. I do. So, I believe that fentanyl is deadly.
00:08:17.580 Let's see. Do you believe anybody has ever died of regular cigarettes and getting lung cancer?
00:08:24.000 Yes, my mother. Yeah. Yep. Pretty normal thing. So, I do believe the cigarettes are associated or cause
00:08:33.040 lung cancer. But how could I get to my current age and never hear of one example of anybody had a
00:08:40.320 health problem with marijuana? So, the first filter is observation versus science. It doesn't
00:08:49.140 mean the science is wrong if your observation is different because you can be biased and confirmation
00:08:54.240 biased and all that. But if you don't see any correlation between the news that's telling you
00:09:01.380 there's this gigantic thing and you're looking around and you've never seen it, it should raise
00:09:06.600 the flag. But let me put it in these terms and see if it seems funnier. If it's true that they just
00:09:14.800 found a 25% increased risk of heart attack and 40% of stroke from daily marijuana users and we had
00:09:22.380 never detected that before. In all of the different marijuana studies, nobody had detected a 25% difference
00:09:32.160 or a 42% difference. We've never detected that before. This tells me one of two things. Either science was
00:09:42.480 never real until this year. Because really, all the science couldn't find this gigantic difference
00:09:50.600 for, what, a hundred years? Nobody noticed this. All those studies came up blank. But this one,
00:09:59.660 well, this new one, nailed it. So, either this is the first time science has ever been right
00:10:06.160 or this is bullshit. It's one or the other. You have to pick one. Either science has never been 0.99
00:10:14.340 real until this year. But they finally got it right after all that, all those messes. They finally
00:10:20.400 got it right. Or this is bullshit. I'm going to go with this bullshit because that's what I want to 0.99
00:10:26.920 believe. All right. There's another research that says that Viagra use decreases the risk of 1.00
00:10:38.040 Alzheimer's by 60%. Again, I ask, if there's a 60% decrease in Alzheimer's from boner pills,
00:10:47.980 nobody noticed that until now. Nobody found that correlation. Well, I think there might be a few
00:10:57.460 things going on. One is if you, I assume this is based on asking people for their own report.
00:11:06.420 So, they don't put a camera in the bedroom of the old folks and say, all right, I saw him taking a 0.99
00:11:11.220 Viagra. All right. And then I noticed that he was not having any Alzheimer's. No, it's got to be
00:11:18.680 self-reported, right? Wouldn't you say? They self-report that they take Viagra and then they either
00:11:26.440 self-report or there's some doctor report that says they had Alzheimer's or not. But do you see any
00:11:33.280 potential problem with that study? Makes you wonder if people remember they took the, maybe they forgot
00:11:43.300 they took the Viagra or they forgot they didn't. I don't know. Doing a study where you're self-reporting
00:11:50.600 and the group is, you're checking for Alzheimer's seems like a natural problem. I don't know. Maybe
00:11:54.900 they found a way to get around that. But I would say this is a big movement forward in science because
00:12:04.340 now, now that we know that the Viagra will help you with your sexual performance as well as your
00:12:11.840 mental performance, now a guy my age can bang a woman and also remember her name afterwards. 0.99
00:12:19.280 Now that's new. So it's a big step forward for science. All right. There's a estimate out of
00:12:29.440 the UK that artificial intelligence could take 84% of the government jobs because a lot of the
00:12:36.740 government jobs are just pushing paperwork around and stuff. So 84%. I'm going to do you one better.
00:12:44.560 I think AI could be the entire government and will be. Actually, I'll make that a prediction.
00:12:52.520 It won't happen on day one. But AI will actually be the entire government.
00:12:58.580 All you have to do is feed it a little, the constitution, a bunch of case law. It could do it
00:13:05.020 all. It could be the judge and jury. It could be the entire legal system. And it could do all your
00:13:11.560 paperwork, all your taxes. You shouldn't be able to just show all your information,
00:13:17.780 you know, just scan it in and have it do your taxes. Because if it sees all the documents,
00:13:22.060 what else does it need? You're not allowed to write anything down. You know, I mean,
00:13:26.960 you could tell it, oh, I gave some donations without a receipt or something. But
00:13:31.420 think about the cost of our government. Think what it costs to have a government. And then imagine
00:13:41.220 you could get rid of all those costs. Because it would just be, you just pick up your phone and
00:13:47.160 you're talking to the government. AI is a fad? I don't think so.
00:13:53.280 So there is a possibility that the national debt could be paid. It could be, I mean, obviously,
00:14:02.280 if we fired all these government employees, that'd be another problem. But it could be that we could
00:14:07.440 reduce the cost of government so much that we could pay off the debt. Think about how much we spend just
00:14:17.720 to keep government employees. And we don't need them. We might not need any of them. Now I'm going
00:14:24.280 to go full Star Trek on you. You ready? I'm going full Star Trek. In the future, all militaries will
00:14:35.100 be replaced by AI. Because the AI will accurately figure out who would have won the war. So you won't
00:14:45.920 need to do the war. It'll make a war unnecessary. Because it will just tell you who's going to win 0.84
00:14:53.160 and how long it will take and how many people would die. So instead of the, let's say, Ukraine-Russia
00:14:58.220 thing, if they had started gearing up for war, AI would have said, all right, it looks like this will
00:15:03.840 probably be some kind of a stalemate situation. But if Russia keeps at it and loses a half a million
00:15:10.080 people, they can definitely prevail in the long run, risk of nuclear war, you know, 25%, whatever
00:15:16.420 it is. And then everybody looks at it and they go, oh, okay, well, this isn't worth doing.
00:15:24.480 Now, obviously, that's super, you know, super, let's say, optimistic. But if you imagine, for example,
00:15:33.820 will AI helping us avoid war, then you make it a bigger topic, could it help us avoid war?
00:15:41.520 I think it actually could. Because in order to have a war, you almost always have to brainwash
00:15:47.060 some member of the public. Am I right? War is usually a brainwashing operation first 0.84
00:15:54.320 to get the country on its side. I saw a video today of an ex-CIA guy from, I don't know,
00:16:01.560 look like the 60s or something, talking in an interview and saying that one of the reasons
00:16:06.780 that the CIA does the big narrative, like the big narrative is communists are coming to take
00:16:13.800 over the world. We have to stop them everywhere, domino effect. That's not real. That's something
00:16:20.360 that the CIA told us. Do you know why? As the agent explained, if you want to take over the country
00:16:27.380 of Nicaragua using your CIA, you first have to say that there's the bigger reason that, oh,
00:16:34.500 it's part of the dominoes of communism. So we wouldn't really care about one little country
00:16:39.360 enough to, you know, care about taking over its government or staging a coup. But if you say,
00:16:47.180 oh, it's not really about the little country, it's about the dominoes. When I was a kid,
00:16:52.960 we all thought the dominoes was a thing. Oh, this one falls and the others fall. It's a domino
00:16:58.700 thing. So you always need the big story. And this will be my theme for today. You need the big
00:17:04.940 story that's completely made up in order to sell a war to your own public. Right? So Putin's got the 0.61
00:17:13.980 big story. That's, you know, NATO's against them and Russia. Russia used to own this stuff. 0.89
00:17:22.580 Israel's got the big story. You know, their version is they've always been there and, you 0.98
00:17:27.640 know, blah, blah, blah. That's the big story. So then they can do the little things as long
00:17:32.560 as it fits within the big story. Well, what happens if AI tells us the big story is not true?
00:17:38.760 Which it would, you know, unless it's completely fake AI. But the AI will say, you know what,
00:17:45.580 there's not really any reason for this war. It would make more sense to be allies. I think AI
00:17:51.700 would have said, war with Russia? Well, that's crazy. Why don't you just be allies? You could
00:17:56.580 make a lot of money. You don't really have anything that you're fighting over. Now, that's not true
00:18:01.940 because the war is really about resources. Imagine AI said, why would you have a war when
00:18:09.600 all your CIA did a coup in Ukraine and tried to sell it to your own public like it was some natural
00:18:15.740 thing? If AI told us as it was happening, oh, this is a CIA op here in Ukraine, you would have a
00:18:24.340 completely different opinion than if they said Russia is the big bear on the move trying to recreate
00:18:30.220 the Soviet Union. And they're going to start with Ukraine and Poland's next. See, the big story 0.96
00:18:37.360 is what gives them permission to do the thing they want to do, which is go blow up a pipeline,
00:18:43.580 take the oil business or the gas business mostly away from Russia. So if AI could blow up the big
00:18:51.420 story, there would be no wars because all the wars are about the big story. They're never about the
00:18:57.980 thing that's happening at the moment. It's always about the big story. What happens if the big
00:19:03.000 stories all go away? Because they're not real. The big stories are never real. They're all bullshit
00:19:08.660 in order to hypnotize the public to go to war. Anyway, so AI could get rid of militaries. It could 1.00
00:19:16.420 get rid of the government. There's going to be a lot of change coming. Apparently, Trump is in court
00:19:22.860 today, something over the Stormy Daniels case. Let's see if I can remember which one of the 91
00:19:29.260 indictments in law affairs of Stormy Daniels. Something about his penis. That's all I remember. 0.99
00:19:39.100 Does anybody remember anything else about that story except I think it involved his penis? 0.99
00:19:45.400 That's all I remember. So I don't think that one's going to take him down. I don't even know what 0.98
00:19:50.640 that one's about. But is today the day he's supposed to pay the half a million dollar fines? Or at least
00:19:56.780 the 400 something fine? Is today the day? Oh, it's not today? When does he have to pay it? I thought
00:20:09.360 it was today. Now, ask yourself, if you were Trump, how would you handle that deadline? Now, he said
00:20:18.980 publicly he has the cash. But we don't really think he necessarily does. So we don't know. What would be
00:20:26.960 the most Trumpian way to play this? I would like to make a suggestion. I would like the most Trump-like
00:20:35.040 thing to do was to keep the mystery until the last minute. So for example, if he did find a way to pay
00:20:43.220 it off, don't tell us until you write the check. Make us wonder all the way till the end.
00:20:52.300 Just a perfect Trump thing to do. And then it gets better. I want to see a video of him taking a
00:20:58.860 checkbook out of his pocket and asking for a pen and asking who he makes the check out to.
00:21:05.320 Don't you want to see him ask who to make the check out to? Do I make this out to Letitia James or
00:21:14.660 Judge Erdogan? What do I make? Do I just make it out to the Joe Biden, the Democrats? How do you want
00:21:22.980 this to go? And then they give him some official name. And then he just writes $450 million.
00:21:29.340 And we just have to watch him writing the check. And he writes a personal check for half a billion
00:21:37.120 dollars. What a baller thing that would be to write a personal check for half a billion dollars.
00:21:44.020 Now, my guess is they won't take a personal check, but it's still really funny. It would be funny to
00:21:50.020 have them watch them reject his personal check. Wouldn't you love to see that? You know,
00:21:55.740 have them hand it over to some, I don't know, some kind of a court official and have the court 0.91
00:22:03.200 official look at his personal check and say, do you have identification? Do you have a driver's
00:22:09.460 license? And then Trump would be, well, actually, I don't even have a driver's license. I haven't
00:22:15.260 driven in years. And then they would say, well, how do I know who you are? Would that be good TV?
00:22:21.660 Yes, it would. Pay it in cash. Pay it in pennies, you say. All right, what else is going on?
00:22:29.460 ISIS says they're going to release a longer video from the Moscow attacks. How is that possible?
00:22:36.840 Now, I don't know all the details of that Moscow attack, but did any of the attackers get away?
00:22:42.700 I thought they all got caught. If they all got caught, how could ISIS still have a video that we 0.59
00:22:48.440 haven't seen? Did they upload it while they were shooting? I doubt it. I think they were busy.
00:22:57.740 How in the world could ISIS have another video? Unless it was never ISIS. It was always an op. 0.56
00:23:06.280 Because if it was an op, yeah, we might have the video. But I can't imagine how the perps could have
00:23:14.300 gotten the video from the body cams all the way to some ISIS handler in the hot moments of the 1.00
00:23:23.400 firefighting. I don't know. Everything about that's suspicious. If I had to put my bet on it, I would
00:23:33.360 say it was American CIA trying to make it look like it was ISIS. What do you think? I think it was
00:23:42.020 our intelligence people just making it look like ISIS. That's my best guess. I think Putin's right 0.50
00:23:48.060 about that. But I could be wrong. So 60 Minutes talked to Mexico's president, Obrador. And it was
00:23:59.220 asked about all the fentanyl coming from Mexico. And he said, whoa, whoa, whoa. Fentanyl is also made in the
00:24:07.900 United States and Canada. So why are you picking on Mexico? And then the pathetic 60 Minutes person 0.98
00:24:17.840 said, well, you know, according to our officials, most of it comes from Mexico. That's not really 0.96
00:24:25.700 good enough, is it? If most of it came from Mexico, but we also make it in the United States,
00:24:32.380 wouldn't the production just switch to the United States or Canada? So it might be a good point that
00:24:41.160 the vast majority of it comes from Mexico, but he might have a point that it wouldn't matter where
00:24:46.180 it came from. Now, we assume that, well, I assume that the president of Mexico is essentially an employee
00:24:53.940 of the cartel of Mexico. And so, you know, he's going to say whatever's good for keeping the fentanyl
00:24:59.580 business going. But related to that, there's a study that finds that the fifth largest employer
00:25:07.760 in Mexico is the cartels. The fifth largest business, well, employer, I guess, fifth largest employer
00:25:20.660 is the cartels. Now, if your fifth largest employer is the cartels, and you're the president of Mexico,
00:25:27.940 Mexico, you can't really get out of the fentanyl business. But more importantly, since I think the
00:25:33.760 fentanyl business is largely a partnership between the cartels and U.S. intelligence agencies who find
00:25:41.580 it productive to work with bad guys, it's never going to stop. But here's something that the president
00:25:48.500 of Mexico did say helpfully. He said, did you ever notice why there's not a big drug problem in Mexico?
00:25:54.420 And I said to myself, wait, what? How could they have access to all the drugs? And yet they don't
00:26:04.200 have a drug problem in Mexico? And I thought about it, and I thought, I've never heard of a drug problem
00:26:09.900 in Mexico, have you? And he says that they don't have one because they celebrate their customs,
00:26:16.180 traditions, and they don't have a problem with the disintegration of the family.
00:26:19.840 Do you think that's it? Do you think that Mexicans don't do fentanyl because they have good families? 0.96
00:26:29.820 That seems a little simplistic. I feel like there's something happening there that we should understand.
00:26:37.820 Do you think they just drink more alcohol? I don't know. I don't exactly know. Maybe it's cultural.
00:26:44.060 Maybe they don't. Maybe if you're struggling, you don't think of fentanyl. Fentanyl to me always seemed like
00:26:53.960 the people who were not struggling in life but had to give themselves a problem. You know what I mean?
00:27:00.160 A lot of people born to middle-class families, every ability to go to college, get a job,
00:27:06.000 and they have these useless lives that don't make any sense. And then anything makes sense if nothing
00:27:14.000 makes sense. So I can see why maybe the meaningless of life in the United States contributes, whereas
00:27:21.500 there might be more meaning if you're working hard every day, you know, breaking your back just to eat,
00:27:27.040 and you've got family and religion. That's a lot of meaning. So I would say meaning is probably a big
00:27:36.860 part of it, but I don't know how much. All right. So I contend that if either the Mexican government
00:27:46.220 wanted to stop the fentanyl trade or the American government, either one, it would have stopped.
00:27:52.260 Is that fair? That if either one, and it would only take one, you don't even need the other one
00:27:58.300 to agree. If either Mexico wanted to stop it or the U.S. wanted to stop it, it wouldn't look anything
00:28:04.060 the way it looks. It would be completely different. So I think we have to assume that it's intentional
00:28:10.960 on the part of our own government as well as Mexico. And so that means that we're probably working
00:28:17.640 with the cartels. President of Mexico proposes that we would handle immigration this way. He says the
00:28:24.740 U.S. should commit to $20 billion a year to the poor countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
00:28:29.960 You know, that would keep people home. Lift sanctions on Venezuela, which would allow their 1.00
00:28:34.920 economy to improve so people would stay home. And end the Cuban embargo. I don't know exactly how
00:28:42.280 that fits into the whole thing. And then legalize law-abiding Mexicans living in the U.S. So 0.98
00:28:47.580 basically just make them all citizens, at least the Mexicans he's talking about. 0.87
00:28:55.120 Well, how do you think of that idea? I don't know. Every time somebody has an idea for what America
00:29:06.480 should do, it's like, well, you start with reaching into your pocket and running up some debt and
00:29:13.520 giving us billions of dollars. All right. Well, I may have said this yesterday, but I think that the
00:29:19.540 squatter situation is the most persuasive thing happening in politics. Anybody want to agree or
00:29:28.180 disagree? That all the video, especially of the squatters taking over people's homes,
00:29:33.940 that's the number one most persuasive thing I've ever seen in politics. I've never seen anything
00:29:40.960 on this level. Because here's what it has. It's got the visual, right? Because we've got videos of
00:29:47.020 the actual homes taking over. You've got fear. Fear is the number one persuader. But the fear of
00:29:54.280 literally criminals taking over your house, that's like really scary. But on top of that,
00:30:01.500 we care more about losing something we had, especially if you worked all your life and it's
00:30:07.280 your main asset in life, your fear of losing the main thing you worked for all your life
00:30:12.780 is just off the chart. It's just off the chart. Now, almost everything else feels like it could be
00:30:20.000 somebody else's problem. Like when I see crime, I do worry that it'll get me too. But I largely watch
00:30:27.800 it as a story about other people. I don't know if you have that experience. If you're not in the
00:30:33.100 middle of the crime, it feels like something happening to other people. But when I see a
00:30:37.240 video of somebody losing their house and how easy it was, that's personal to me. Like I change my
00:30:47.540 vacation plans. Not really, but you know what I mean. I mean, I actually will act differently
00:30:53.040 because of that risk. Yeah. And we see, what state is it? Minnesota or somebody is going to
00:31:03.920 pay people $500 to keep migrants in their house. Just think of that. Which one is that? Let's see. 1.00
00:31:11.540 Some stupid state. I can't remember which one. No, not North Korea. All right. One of our stupid 1.00
00:31:21.980 states. Oh, here it is, Michigan. So Michigan is going to give $500 a month to homeowners if 1.00
00:31:30.320 they let what they call the newcomers or the immigrants, the migrants, live there in their 0.97
00:31:35.580 house for $500 a month. So do you see any problem with that? Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you
00:31:45.640 bring in a roommate who's a migrant and then you drive your kids to school, the migrant can change 0.99
00:31:54.220 the locks on the house and take your house. Am I wrong? I'm right, aren't I? They can move into your
00:32:02.280 house and pay you nothing and change the locks when you go on vacation and then it's their
00:32:06.400 house. I don't know if that works in Michigan, but in, I don't know, 22 states that would work.
00:32:13.880 Just think about how dumb everything is right now. And I'll tell you in a bit why everything 0.89
00:32:22.220 is so dumb if you hadn't figured it out. I'll tell you in a minute. All right. A federal 0.97
00:32:31.920 judge in DC upheld a law allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. So the vote has
00:32:40.540 been given to non-citizens in DC. Let me see who that judge is. Oh, it's a batshit crazy
00:32:49.580 liberal white woman. Yep. So, oh, here's a surprise. Somebody doing something that's clearly not in 1.00
00:32:58.160 the interest of the United States or any of the citizens. Who would do such a thing? A batshit
00:33:04.820 crazy liberal woman. Yeah. Now, other people might do it, but there's definitely a theme that's hard 1.00
00:33:14.580 to miss. James Garville didn't miss it. He says, and I quote, a suspicion of mine is that there are too
00:33:22.880 many preachy females. That would be your batshit crazy females. Don't drink beer. Don't watch 1.00
00:33:30.360 football. Don't eat hamburgers. This is not good for you. He said, the message is too feminine,
00:33:35.580 meaning the Democrat message. Everything you're doing is destroying the planet. You've got to eat
00:33:40.360 your peas. And then he goes on. If you, if you listen to democratic elites, NPR is my go-to place for
00:33:51.440 that. The whole talk is about how women and women of color are going to decide this election. And he
00:33:56.860 says, I'm like, well, 48% of the people that vote are males. Do you mind if they have some
00:34:01.900 consideration? That's right. So in the Democrat party is clearly the female party. James Garville 1.00
00:34:11.280 is quite aware of it. And part of the problem of having a female party is that there, apparently, 1.00
00:34:16.780 there are some tasks that women just can't do. Now, when I say that, does it mean every single woman? 1.00
00:34:24.120 Does it mean that Margaret Thatcher can't do it? No, it doesn't mean every woman. It never means
00:34:31.240 every single person. But clearly, we have a problem with crazy, liberal white women. 1.00
00:34:39.580 It's crazy, liberal white women. And if you can't say it out loud, you can't fix it. 1.00
00:34:43.860 So this is the value of canceled people. Because I'm a canceled person, I can say out loud what
00:34:49.500 you're all thinking. What the hell is wrong with these crazy white women who are doing things that 1.00
00:34:53.960 are bad for the country? Somewhat obviously, like really obviously, yeah, the awfuls, as they're called. 1.00
00:35:01.240 So let's see. Got that going on. We'll get back to that theme. Mike Cernovich looked at the
00:35:10.780 court ruling about that half a billion dollar fine on Trump. And apparently, if you look into the
00:35:16.280 details, and Mike is qualified to do that, it's way worse than you think. You know how there was no
00:35:25.760 victim? Normally, a fine would be based on the victims. Like, you know, they lost this much
00:35:33.300 allegedly, so you paid them this much, maybe a little extra for whatever. But it would be largely
00:35:39.220 based on what the cost to somebody else was. Do you know what they did in this case? Since there was no
00:35:46.180 victim. They based the size of the fine. I swear to God, I'm not making this up on how much profit he made.
00:35:58.460 Just think about that. They, the fine is based on how much profit he made.
00:36:03.540 Because they said, he wouldn't have deserved that profit, except for the fraud. They had no cost,
00:36:14.880 and everybody involved made money and was happy about it. So they took his profit away.
00:36:19.760 Also, Mike Cernovich points out, they, they negated the severance package between Trump and his former
00:36:27.480 CFO, the guy who also is going to jail. So Trump was okay with the severance package. Trump organization
00:36:34.800 was okay with it. The guy who was going to get it was okay with it. And the judge decided to void it.
00:36:42.080 What?
00:36:42.520 What? What? How do you void somebody's contract that's completely legal and both sides are happy
00:36:51.340 with it? That happened. You didn't know that detail until Mike Cernovich looked into it.
00:37:01.120 So to me, it looks like just theft by the government. I think Mike said something like that too.
00:37:05.480 And it's, it's, it's, it's, there's, there's no precedent for this. And, and Mike also pointed out
00:37:14.980 that the, the case law used for the precedent didn't even apply. It was just, just a completely
00:37:20.740 made up fine, made up case. Yeah. So there you go. I have a theory about why DEI still persists.
00:37:35.480 Because I do keep running into people online who don't understand why it's a problem.
00:37:42.120 And, and I've decided that I started out thinking it was like a philosophical problem or there's a
00:37:48.640 difference in priorities, something like that. But really the DEI thing is that people who are bad at
00:37:55.560 analysis have a different opinion than the people who are good at analysis and have experience.
00:38:01.220 This is purely a logic question. And I went back and forth with somebody I think is smart,
00:38:08.640 but still couldn't figure it out. So apparently the people on the left believe that it's a demand
00:38:17.400 problem. That if you could get the corporations to try harder to hire people who are in the diverse
00:38:24.560 categories, you get a better outcome and you could do it without lowering the quality of the
00:38:30.000 employees. They actually think that. To which I say, that might work for Google, right? Because
00:38:40.720 Google would be a, you know, or Apple or somebody who are a real first level employer, but they're
00:38:46.080 going to suck up all of the available high quality, diverse people because they want to look diverse. 0.99
00:38:52.780 So they're going to suck up everybody who's good. Well, who's left? Every other company is going to have 0.59
00:38:58.660 to get some diversity and all the good ones just got sucked up. If there were enough people, it would be
00:39:04.640 great. But there's this imaginary view that there's some magical Negro somewhere who's got high
00:39:12.400 qualifications. By the way, that's based on the movie, The Magical Negro. I'm not, that's not a racial thing I
00:39:18.780 just made up on my own. In movies, there's a thing called The Magical Negro who like solves a problem
00:39:25.920 in the end of the movie in kind of a trite, stereotypical way or something. So that's a movie
00:39:32.120 term. But where was I? Oh, DEI. So people really believe that there's a, there's a demand problem.
00:39:46.420 Have any of you ever worked for a major corporation? They have insatiable demand for
00:39:54.020 diversity. They're looking everywhere for it. They're trying as hard as they can. And even if
00:39:59.340 you changed all the, you know, DEI tomorrow, if you get, if you got rid of all the DEI, they would
00:40:04.640 still try really hard. The reason they have to try so hard is that it's not possible. It's, it's a game
00:40:11.900 in which a few could win, you know, a Google and an Apple, they, they might actually be able to hire
00:40:17.580 enough people of exactly the quality they need. But once you've hired all those people, you end up
00:40:23.680 with a supply problem, which is not enough. And for some reason, that concept of there's not enough,
00:40:32.420 Democrats don't seem to understand that. How do you not understand supply and demand?
00:40:41.160 And the part that they really don't understand is that the managers who have tasks and bonuses that
00:40:48.100 depend on increasing diversity, they are going to hire diverse. They're just going to lower their 0.99
00:40:54.160 standards. And, and I swear to God, you can't get anybody to understand that that's not just a risk.
00:41:00.360 It's a guarantee built into the system. If you give somebody the bonus this year, like just a few
00:41:08.760 months from now, based on whether I've hired diverse candidates, I will hire diverse candidates. I will,
00:41:16.720 I will manage to my bonus. And then you say to me, but Scott, in the long run, that's not going to work
00:41:24.480 out for you. Because if you really did lower your standards, your performance of your group you're hiring
00:41:30.220 for would be bad in the long run, and they would just catch up to you. You know what I say to that?
00:41:35.600 Well, if it catches up to me after I get the bonus, I'm going to play for the bonus.
00:41:40.880 That's what I'm going to do. And then next year, I'm going to say, yeah, my project is not finished,
00:41:45.460 but it's not because you forced me to hire people who are less qualified. It's because blah, blah, blah,
00:41:51.340 the supply chain or something. I'll just make up corporate reasons why I'm not done. And I'll just say
00:41:57.140 it wasn't anything to do with diversity, just bad luck. Competitors did better timing, didn't have
00:42:02.880 enough budget, all that stuff. Right? So you, here's the thing that, and I guess this is what
00:42:09.700 people don't understand. In the corporate world, you measure to what you, you manage to what is
00:42:17.020 measurable. And diversity is 100% measurable the way we do it. Is this candidate black? I don't know.
00:42:26.280 Could you make them look black on paper? Well, they've got a little bit of black in there. So
00:42:31.300 yes. So we know how to measure it. So the thing that you can measure is what all managers will
00:42:38.320 manage to. The thing you can't measure is whether or not, if you'd hired differently,
00:42:44.820 you would have gotten a different outcome. You'll never know. So you don't measure to the thing that
00:42:51.720 you don't manage to what can't be measured now or ever. You manage to what can be measured,
00:42:57.580 the diversity level, and you give up everything else to get there. That's the real world. Now,
00:43:04.240 how do people not understand that? How is that a hard concept? I think if you have no experience
00:43:11.420 in the real world as a hiring person, which I've done, if you have no experience, it wouldn't be
00:43:17.560 obvious. Like it doesn't really jump right out at you as that's what would happen. But once someone
00:43:23.580 has explained that there's a limitation in the supply, what do people think happens? Like in the
00:43:32.140 real world, do you think people just miss their goals? Never. You're going to hire whatever gives
00:43:38.980 you that bonus, period. All right. California job growth apparently is the ranks dead last in the
00:43:47.760 U.S. for the first time since 1993. I wonder why California's growth in jobs would be less than
00:43:57.720 every other country. Is there anything we do here in California that would be, let's say,
00:44:04.780 I don't know, negative to humans who live here or businesses? Could it be that we're running out of
00:44:12.840 energy, water, we can't get insurance because of our fires and there's no affordability of housing
00:44:19.120 and all we have is regulations and the highest taxes you've ever seen in your life and it's getting
00:44:24.660 worse and crime everywhere and unchecked immigration? Could it be that when you do all the things that are 1.00
00:44:33.180 obviously really bad for business and for human beings that it makes a difference? Yeah. Safety,
00:44:41.200 safety, yeah. Apparently it makes a difference. So I guess you don't get to work at In-N-Out in
00:44:47.100 Oakland because Oakland's too poorly managed to have an In-N-Out. They don't get to have one.
00:44:53.320 The city is too poorly managed. So good job, California. You might know there was a study that
00:45:00.400 showed that the fact checkers are almost entirely left-leaning and super left-leaning. You all knew
00:45:06.500 that, right? So apparently there's not much in the way of conservative fact checkers anywhere.
00:45:12.260 So the fact checkers are all fake. They're there to support Democrats basically. And Michael
00:45:20.060 Schellenberger is talking about this fact checker who got it wrong. The Australian government is
00:45:24.600 demanding that ex-Facebook and other social media companies censor content that its fact checkers say
00:45:30.560 is inaccurate. What? But now one of the government's main fact checker groups has been caught spreading
00:45:37.540 misinformation about renewables and nuclear. So the trouble is that the fact checkers, if you believe
00:45:43.140 that they're real, which they're not, all the fact checkers are fake, that your news is going to
00:45:51.700 follow the fact checkers and you end up doing your nuclear and everything else wrong. So the fact
00:45:57.460 checkers are actually a mortal risk to the existence of civilization. Now, if we had free speech, 0.59
00:46:05.000 which largely don't, then the fact checking wouldn't make as much difference because people would check
00:46:11.320 the fact checkers. But if you bubble everybody off so they don't see anybody else's opinion,
00:46:17.000 the fact checkers could be too powerful, which is what's happening now.
00:46:21.700 France has a new terror alert. So France raised its security alert to the highest level
00:46:28.140 following the Moscow attack. Now, do you think that's a fake out?
00:46:34.160 Since everything's fake,
00:46:37.220 so do you think that ISIS
00:46:38.900 is more likely to attack France 0.63
00:46:42.800 than it was a month ago? Does that seem likely?
00:46:47.100 No. You know what I think is likely? I think that France needs to support the idea that it was
00:46:58.680 some kind of Islamic terrorist. And so they're raising their alerts to make it look like,
00:47:05.760 hey, these Islamic terrorists, they could be coming after us too, Russia. 0.95
00:47:09.660 Wait, why would you think we were behind it? 0.61
00:47:13.780 I mean, we just had to raise our terror alerts
00:47:16.420 too. I mean,
00:47:18.120 why would you think we were behind it?
00:47:20.660 I mean, look, we have the same risk.
00:47:22.960 We've raised our terror alert risk.
00:47:26.220 I don't know.
00:47:27.600 To me, it looks a little bit
00:47:29.540 artificial.
00:47:32.820 Now, if there's a big terror attack in France
00:47:35.420 in the next two weeks, I'm going to eat my words.
00:47:39.860 But it sounds a little bit
00:47:41.700 too much like supporting the narrative.
00:47:44.540 No, it wasn't the Americans 0.96
00:47:46.200 and the CIA who
00:47:47.860 bankrolled those bad people in Moscow.
00:47:50.740 No, no, it wasn't Ukraine.
00:47:53.120 No, it's a
00:47:53.900 this is a risk we all share.
00:47:56.780 So France, 0.70
00:47:57.920 we're under the same risk you were
00:47:59.860 in Moscow.
00:48:01.860 Doesn't look real to me.
00:48:03.060 Meanwhile, a Boston activist
00:48:06.200 is seeking $15 billion
00:48:07.720 in reparations
00:48:08.880 for slavery
00:48:10.140 and calling on white churches
00:48:12.100 to commit to extending their wealth
00:48:13.820 to black people. 0.96
00:48:15.380 Have you ever seen 0.99
00:48:16.460 a worse year
00:48:17.720 for the black brand
00:48:19.080 in America?
00:48:21.120 This is the number one
00:48:22.640 worst year 0.96
00:48:23.380 for black Americans 0.88
00:48:24.880 in terms of
00:48:25.960 their reputation
00:48:26.840 in America.
00:48:27.800 Let me just give you
00:48:28.640 a sample
00:48:29.200 of what's happened
00:48:30.720 just recently.
00:48:31.480 we'll go back
00:48:32.920 a couple of years.
00:48:34.700 So we've got
00:48:35.820 all black prosecutors 0.53
00:48:37.520 going after Trump. 0.50
00:48:39.320 Do you think
00:48:40.080 anybody noticed
00:48:40.840 that the prosecutors
00:48:43.020 seem to be
00:48:43.760 very black?
00:48:47.840 Now, 0.97
00:48:48.560 that could be
00:48:49.600 a coincidence.
00:48:50.420 It could have
00:48:50.900 just to do with
00:48:51.600 the domains
00:48:52.460 that are going
00:48:53.420 at him.
00:48:54.940 But it doesn't look
00:48:56.040 like a coincidence.
00:48:57.380 It looks like
00:48:58.360 lawfare
00:48:58.940 and it looks like
00:49:00.340 all of these 0.91
00:49:01.000 black women 1.00
00:49:01.680 who are
00:49:02.740 DAs
00:49:03.780 and attorney generals,
00:49:05.760 they look like 0.99
00:49:06.480 criminals 0.97
00:49:06.900 to me.
00:49:09.080 And it's much worse
00:49:10.100 to look like
00:49:10.820 a criminal
00:49:11.300 in an official job.
00:49:13.880 So if you're
00:49:15.160 Bob Menendez,
00:49:16.320 Gold Bar Bob,
00:49:17.980 it looks worse 0.93
00:49:19.260 that he's a criminal 0.99
00:49:20.580 and he's an elected 0.86
00:49:22.400 representative.
00:49:23.000 Right?
00:49:25.480 If it's just
00:49:26.100 a regular crime,
00:49:27.000 you go,
00:49:27.280 oh,
00:49:27.440 it's just
00:49:27.700 a regular crime.
00:49:28.900 But it looks
00:49:29.980 way worse
00:49:30.800 that elected
00:49:31.700 officials
00:49:32.260 and prosecutors
00:49:34.100 are clearly
00:49:35.280 criminal.
00:49:36.080 I would say
00:49:36.540 obviously criminal.
00:49:38.680 Yeah.
00:49:38.900 Now,
00:49:39.120 there are some
00:49:39.500 white people
00:49:39.940 in there,
00:49:40.320 but the faces
00:49:41.420 we see the most
00:49:42.560 are the prosecutors.
00:49:44.700 You're seeing
00:49:45.120 Letitia James
00:49:45.960 and Fonnie Willis
00:49:46.940 the most.
00:49:48.120 So I'm not saying
00:49:49.300 what's true or false.
00:49:50.340 I'm just saying
00:49:50.900 that the impression
00:49:51.680 that people will get 0.77
00:49:52.720 is black faces
00:49:55.640 doing something 0.96
00:49:56.560 obviously illegal
00:49:57.580 in front of all of us.
00:49:59.440 So that's bad. 0.99
00:50:00.260 If you were black, 0.99
00:50:01.040 you'd hate that. 0.99
00:50:04.140 Of course,
00:50:04.960 DEI is a terrible
00:50:06.540 stain on black 1.00
00:50:07.540 Americans 0.99
00:50:07.980 because,
00:50:08.460 you know,
00:50:08.980 the nickname
00:50:10.660 didn't earn it
00:50:11.500 is exactly what 0.88
00:50:13.200 every non-black 0.98
00:50:14.460 person thinks 0.55
00:50:15.180 about it
00:50:15.660 who is not
00:50:16.760 crazy, 0.99
00:50:17.840 batshit, 1.00
00:50:18.500 liberal. 0.98
00:50:19.940 So DEI
00:50:21.460 is probably
00:50:21.880 the worst
00:50:22.340 reputational stain 0.99
00:50:23.460 for black 0.99
00:50:23.940 Americans
00:50:24.400 in my memory.
00:50:26.660 Then you've got
00:50:27.480 the reparations
00:50:28.380 programs,
00:50:29.300 which to
00:50:30.060 non-black people 0.94
00:50:31.140 look like theft. 0.99
00:50:32.760 It looks like
00:50:33.640 just some kind
00:50:34.600 of organized
00:50:35.220 theft.
00:50:36.800 So I just see it
00:50:37.980 as an attempt
00:50:38.900 to rob me.
00:50:39.800 That's not a good
00:50:41.980 look.
00:50:43.060 An organized
00:50:43.860 attempt to rob
00:50:44.560 me.
00:50:46.480 The whole
00:50:47.180 George Floyd
00:50:48.060 narrative fell
00:50:49.120 apart. 0.74
00:50:50.780 And so black 1.00
00:50:51.980 people picking
00:50:52.600 George Floyd
00:50:53.260 to build statues
00:50:54.120 to and to use
00:50:54.940 as a role
00:50:56.020 model is a 0.89
00:50:56.700 terrible look
00:50:57.400 from anybody
00:50:58.580 else's perspective.
00:50:59.820 And now we're
00:51:00.780 pretty sure that
00:51:01.380 George Floyd
00:51:01.940 actually died
00:51:02.700 of an overdose.
00:51:04.040 Most of us
00:51:04.700 are sure of that.
00:51:05.380 and that the
00:51:06.460 white guy
00:51:06.880 got railroaded
00:51:09.780 and prosecuted.
00:51:12.420 So that's a
00:51:14.100 terrible look.
00:51:15.540 Terrible look.
00:51:16.620 We know that
00:51:17.220 Black Lives Matter
00:51:18.060 the organization
00:51:18.800 was never real.
00:51:19.960 It was just a
00:51:20.660 big grifter scam
00:51:21.840 and probably
00:51:22.500 organized by our
00:51:23.840 intelligence people.
00:51:24.720 that's a bad
00:51:26.440 look.
00:51:28.800 We found out
00:51:29.780 that the whole
00:51:30.300 problem of
00:51:30.980 police killing 1.00
00:51:31.760 black people 1.00
00:51:32.480 at an unusually 0.99
00:51:34.160 high rate
00:51:34.680 was never
00:51:35.720 true.
00:51:37.340 That's a bad
00:51:38.280 look.
00:51:39.680 That was never
00:51:40.620 true.
00:51:41.740 And we
00:51:42.100 reorganized
00:51:43.780 civilization based
00:51:44.880 on it.
00:51:45.600 It was never
00:51:46.020 true.
00:51:46.960 We changed
00:51:47.480 all of
00:51:47.940 civilization
00:51:48.600 based on
00:51:49.920 that.
00:51:51.360 Great going
00:51:52.140 guys.
00:51:53.500 That really
00:51:54.260 helped.
00:51:54.720 And then I
00:51:56.740 think people
00:51:57.160 are slowly
00:51:57.780 waking up
00:51:58.320 to the
00:51:58.540 fact that
00:51:59.080 one of
00:51:59.720 the biggest
00:52:00.080 complaints
00:52:00.700 of hiring
00:52:02.480 discrimination
00:52:03.520 was never
00:52:04.800 real.
00:52:05.940 At least
00:52:06.300 not in
00:52:06.640 any big
00:52:06.920 company.
00:52:07.840 In big
00:52:08.200 companies
00:52:08.560 they are
00:52:09.160 craving,
00:52:10.860 thirsting,
00:52:11.780 and trying
00:52:12.260 as hard
00:52:12.620 as they
00:52:12.900 can to
00:52:13.360 hire
00:52:13.560 diverse
00:52:14.080 people.
00:52:15.300 And always
00:52:15.560 have,
00:52:16.220 in my
00:52:16.420 experience,
00:52:17.520 always have.
00:52:18.480 Before DEI
00:52:19.420 was even a
00:52:19.980 phrase,
00:52:21.060 corporations
00:52:21.500 were trying
00:52:22.100 really hard
00:52:22.860 to improve
00:52:23.860 their diversity.
00:52:24.480 And now
00:52:28.500 we know
00:52:28.920 that the
00:52:30.420 discrimination
00:52:31.020 against black 1.00
00:52:32.000 people in 0.96
00:52:32.440 hiring was
00:52:33.080 the opposite.
00:52:34.300 It was a
00:52:34.900 strong,
00:52:35.460 strong preference
00:52:36.120 and the
00:52:36.660 discrimination
00:52:37.100 was against
00:52:37.780 white people 0.81
00:52:38.340 and Asians,
00:52:40.320 Asian Americans.
00:52:42.700 So I would
00:52:43.460 say if you put
00:52:43.940 all those
00:52:44.260 things together,
00:52:45.220 the reparations,
00:52:46.340 the DEI, 0.82
00:52:47.100 the black
00:52:47.460 prosecutors going 0.79
00:52:48.440 after Trump,
00:52:49.680 the George
00:52:50.240 Floyd thing
00:52:50.820 falling apart, 0.95
00:52:51.520 black lives 0.98
00:52:52.060 never been
00:52:52.460 real,
00:52:53.260 the police
00:52:54.460 stuff never
00:52:56.200 real,
00:52:57.560 and the
00:52:58.420 discrimination,
00:53:00.140 again,
00:53:01.000 narrative never
00:53:01.800 real.
00:53:03.120 So I would
00:53:04.400 think it's
00:53:04.780 probably the
00:53:05.260 worst five
00:53:06.180 years for the
00:53:07.340 reputation of
00:53:08.020 black Americans,
00:53:08.740 and I think
00:53:10.000 that might be
00:53:10.520 at least part
00:53:11.420 of why Trump
00:53:12.720 is looking
00:53:13.160 better to at
00:53:13.860 least black 0.98
00:53:14.340 men,
00:53:14.960 because he's
00:53:16.640 treating them
00:53:17.100 like adults,
00:53:19.300 just treating
00:53:19.920 them like
00:53:20.220 everybody else,
00:53:21.140 which is a
00:53:22.840 way better
00:53:23.240 look.
00:53:24.340 If you look
00:53:26.100 at this list
00:53:26.740 of things and
00:53:27.360 say to yourself,
00:53:28.560 what do you 0.97
00:53:29.000 think of black
00:53:29.540 Americans in
00:53:31.060 the context
00:53:31.680 of DEI and
00:53:33.360 all this stuff?
00:53:34.740 And I'd say,
00:53:35.640 well, that's
00:53:36.000 not a good
00:53:36.460 look.
00:53:37.520 That's not a
00:53:38.080 good look.
00:53:38.480 Obviously,
00:53:39.580 these are all
00:53:40.320 general things
00:53:40.880 that don't apply
00:53:41.540 to any one
00:53:42.160 person,
00:53:43.300 blah, blah,
00:53:43.860 everybody is
00:53:44.460 infinitely unique,
00:53:45.840 blah, blah.
00:53:46.640 But it's a
00:53:47.220 bad look for
00:53:48.000 your brand,
00:53:49.440 right?
00:53:49.800 If white 0.64
00:53:50.920 people were
00:53:51.420 doing any
00:53:51.900 of the
00:53:52.120 things on
00:53:52.520 this list,
00:53:53.300 I'd be
00:53:54.080 embarrassed.
00:53:55.560 And even
00:53:56.160 if I didn't
00:53:56.700 do them,
00:53:57.820 I'd be
00:53:58.200 embarrassed for
00:53:58.880 my brand.
00:54:01.240 Well, maybe
00:54:02.500 we shouldn't
00:54:02.860 have a
00:54:03.120 brand.
00:54:03.540 Maybe we
00:54:03.840 should just
00:54:04.120 be
00:54:04.300 individuals.
00:54:11.120 Remember
00:54:11.560 I told you
00:54:12.140 about how
00:54:13.400 the CIA
00:54:14.020 likes to
00:54:14.760 have a
00:54:15.200 big threat
00:54:17.240 like communism
00:54:18.380 that allows
00:54:20.220 them to do
00:54:20.660 the small
00:54:21.160 things they
00:54:21.600 want to
00:54:21.860 do,
00:54:22.720 such as
00:54:23.240 maybe
00:54:23.520 overthrow
00:54:24.080 Nicaragua.
00:54:25.700 Right?
00:54:26.280 Understand that
00:54:27.120 concept.
00:54:28.320 The intelligence
00:54:28.900 people get
00:54:30.440 this big
00:54:30.900 umbrella threat
00:54:31.780 and then that
00:54:33.200 allows them to
00:54:33.720 do things
00:54:34.200 within that
00:54:35.020 umbrella.
00:54:37.220 Now, do you
00:54:38.100 understand Black 0.98
00:54:38.880 Lives Matter
00:54:39.420 better?
00:54:41.460 Black Lives
00:54:42.160 Matter was about
00:54:42.920 creating a big
00:54:44.100 umbrella threat
00:54:44.980 that was
00:54:45.300 never real so
00:54:47.320 that they
00:54:47.680 could do
00:54:47.980 individual
00:54:48.440 things like
00:54:49.020 change laws
00:54:49.780 and do
00:54:51.040 things they
00:54:51.440 want to do
00:54:51.760 on that
00:54:52.020 level.
00:54:53.700 Do you
00:54:54.000 know why
00:54:55.640 Biden is
00:54:56.520 talking about
00:54:57.040 MAGA and
00:54:57.580 white supremacists,
00:54:58.840 which is
00:54:59.360 completely not
00:55:00.060 real?
00:55:01.220 And why he's
00:55:01.980 trying to
00:55:02.300 create this
00:55:02.700 umbrella risk
00:55:03.740 of MAGA?
00:55:05.480 It's so you
00:55:06.200 can lock up
00:55:06.760 the January
00:55:07.240 6th people.
00:55:09.120 Because if the
00:55:09.860 only thing you
00:55:10.300 were doing is
00:55:10.740 just locking
00:55:11.220 up the January
00:55:11.820 6th people,
00:55:12.540 it would look
00:55:12.820 terrible.
00:55:13.160 But if it's
00:55:14.760 part of this
00:55:15.320 larger MAGA
00:55:17.000 white supremacy
00:55:17.940 insurrectionist
00:55:18.920 group, well
00:55:20.180 then any
00:55:20.700 individual person
00:55:21.540 you put in
00:55:21.960 jail makes
00:55:23.140 sense, doesn't
00:55:24.980 it?
00:55:25.960 What about
00:55:26.800 everything is
00:55:27.880 Russia, Russia,
00:55:28.660 Putin?
00:55:29.880 That's just
00:55:30.620 the new
00:55:31.000 communism.
00:55:32.640 Yeah.
00:55:33.000 If we can
00:55:33.760 say that
00:55:34.140 everything
00:55:34.480 happening
00:55:34.940 anywhere is
00:55:35.860 Putin's fault,
00:55:36.940 whether it's
00:55:37.420 politics or
00:55:38.120 Ukraine, then
00:55:39.540 you can do
00:55:40.020 all kinds of
00:55:40.580 things.
00:55:41.460 You can
00:55:42.200 overthrow
00:55:42.740 Kiev, you 0.78
00:55:44.280 know, you
00:55:44.500 can just
00:55:45.580 anything, because
00:55:46.880 you've got this
00:55:47.300 big old Putin
00:55:48.240 problem.
00:55:49.680 So now that
00:55:50.180 you see this
00:55:50.680 technique where
00:55:52.020 they, in
00:55:52.680 order to do
00:55:53.200 the small
00:55:53.700 things they
00:55:54.180 want to do 1.00
00:55:54.760 to fuck 1.00
00:55:56.120 you, they 1.00
00:55:57.240 have to put
00:55:57.700 this umbrella
00:55:58.380 of fear over
00:55:59.200 it, then you
00:56:00.500 understand that
00:56:01.120 the umbrella
00:56:01.620 of fear is
00:56:02.180 never real.
00:56:04.000 Have you
00:56:04.620 heard of
00:56:04.880 climate change?
00:56:08.060 Climate
00:56:08.540 change is an
00:56:09.340 umbrella threat
00:56:10.300 threat to
00:56:11.600 allow them
00:56:12.080 to do the
00:56:12.540 little things
00:56:13.080 that they
00:56:13.380 wanted to
00:56:13.840 do.
00:56:16.380 Do you
00:56:16.900 see it
00:56:17.160 now?
00:56:18.380 Do you see
00:56:19.060 the play?
00:56:19.500 It's always
00:56:19.780 the same
00:56:20.120 play.
00:56:20.860 There's this
00:56:21.460 big general
00:56:22.380 threat that
00:56:24.120 the media
00:56:24.660 sells to the
00:56:25.380 public because
00:56:26.260 the media
00:56:26.700 works for
00:56:27.240 the CIA.
00:56:28.740 And the
00:56:29.300 CIA does
00:56:30.140 operate in the
00:56:30.760 United States
00:56:31.340 to brainwash 0.97
00:56:32.060 these citizens,
00:56:33.320 and this is
00:56:33.800 how they do
00:56:34.240 it.
00:56:34.840 They give you
00:56:35.620 an umbrella
00:56:36.140 threat to
00:56:37.240 allow them
00:56:37.680 to do
00:56:37.920 what they
00:56:38.180 need to
00:56:38.520 do below.
00:56:41.100 What about
00:56:41.700 the pandemic?
00:56:44.360 The pandemic
00:56:45.300 gave them a
00:56:46.060 global threat
00:56:46.840 that allowed
00:56:48.180 them to
00:56:48.800 what?
00:56:50.800 Censor.
00:56:51.940 It allowed
00:56:52.660 them to
00:56:53.100 censor the
00:56:53.680 people they
00:56:54.100 wanted to
00:56:54.500 censor,
00:56:55.240 which turned
00:56:56.200 out to be
00:56:56.700 largely
00:56:57.100 political
00:56:57.820 opponents.
00:56:59.460 Oh,
00:56:59.980 surprising.
00:57:01.160 Surprising.
00:57:01.860 There was a
00:57:02.160 big umbrella
00:57:02.700 threat that
00:57:03.300 didn't really
00:57:03.840 look as bad
00:57:04.680 after the
00:57:05.320 fact.
00:57:06.500 You notice
00:57:06.900 that none
00:57:07.200 of these
00:57:07.540 threats look
00:57:08.420 as bad
00:57:09.000 after the
00:57:09.480 fact?
00:57:10.620 After the
00:57:11.360 media stops
00:57:12.020 brainwashing
00:57:12.700 you, and
00:57:13.760 a little time
00:57:14.260 goes by,
00:57:14.940 you think,
00:57:16.180 I don't know
00:57:16.860 if, was
00:57:18.120 that whole
00:57:18.540 domino theory
00:57:19.440 of communism
00:57:20.200 ever real?
00:57:21.680 I don't know.
00:57:22.880 Maybe that
00:57:23.340 was never
00:57:23.660 real.
00:57:25.320 Was Black 0.92
00:57:26.220 Lives Matter
00:57:26.760 ever real?
00:57:27.420 I don't know.
00:57:28.600 Now take
00:57:29.080 my specific
00:57:30.020 situation.
00:57:32.640 If we
00:57:33.400 were not
00:57:33.820 under the
00:57:34.580 larger
00:57:35.180 threat of
00:57:36.440 all that 0.99
00:57:36.860 white 0.91
00:57:37.160 supremacy, 0.92
00:57:38.200 do you
00:57:38.720 think I
00:57:39.040 would have
00:57:39.220 been
00:57:39.380 cancelled?
00:57:41.520 Except for
00:57:42.220 the larger
00:57:43.120 threat of 0.96
00:57:43.680 white
00:57:43.920 supremacy?
00:57:45.360 Well, I
00:57:45.720 don't know.
00:57:46.400 It's an
00:57:46.700 open question.
00:57:48.120 So there's
00:57:48.840 a whole bunch
00:57:49.340 of things
00:57:49.640 you can do
00:57:50.300 once you
00:57:51.100 create the
00:57:51.660 general
00:57:52.300 umbrella
00:57:52.880 fear,
00:57:53.900 you can
00:57:54.280 take care
00:57:54.680 of any
00:57:55.060 individual
00:57:55.540 under that
00:57:56.180 umbrella.
00:57:57.320 And I
00:57:57.600 just happened
00:57:57.960 to be under
00:57:58.380 one of the
00:57:58.880 umbrellas that
00:57:59.540 they created.
00:58:00.560 So as long
00:58:01.280 as I was
00:58:01.660 under one
00:58:02.220 of the
00:58:02.500 umbrellas,
00:58:03.080 they could
00:58:03.320 take me
00:58:03.700 out.
00:58:04.580 And it
00:58:05.860 just happened
00:58:06.220 to be that
00:58:06.560 one.
00:58:08.900 By the
00:58:09.500 way, how
00:58:10.600 much media
00:58:11.340 brainwashing
00:58:12.020 does it
00:58:12.500 take to
00:58:13.820 cancel
00:58:14.200 somebody for
00:58:15.100 complaining
00:58:15.680 that people
00:58:17.240 are racist
00:58:17.900 against him?
00:58:19.440 You know
00:58:20.120 that's why I
00:58:20.580 got cancelled,
00:58:21.140 right?
00:58:21.960 I got cancelled
00:58:22.720 for saying that
00:58:23.560 the country is 0.95
00:58:24.460 training black 0.99
00:58:25.260 people to be 1.00
00:58:26.000 racist against
00:58:26.780 people like
00:58:27.320 me.
00:58:28.120 Is that the 0.98
00:58:28.940 fault of black 1.00
00:58:29.500 people? 0.99
00:58:30.380 No.
00:58:31.480 No.
00:58:32.020 And I
00:58:32.320 never said
00:58:32.720 it was.
00:58:34.020 I said
00:58:34.520 if you're
00:58:35.460 training any
00:58:35.960 group of
00:58:36.380 Americans to
00:58:37.040 be against
00:58:37.480 me, I
00:58:38.500 want to get
00:58:38.840 away from
00:58:39.200 those people.
00:58:40.400 It has
00:58:40.920 nothing to
00:58:41.340 do with
00:58:41.740 any race.
00:58:42.880 It has to
00:58:43.260 do with the
00:58:43.560 people training
00:58:44.200 them, which 0.88
00:58:45.080 is largely 0.67
00:58:45.640 batshit crazy 1.00
00:58:46.440 women. 1.00
00:58:47.660 So batshit 1.00
00:58:48.280 crazy women 1.00
00:58:49.020 are the first 1.00
00:58:49.940 ones who
00:58:50.300 believe the
00:58:50.780 news.
00:58:52.640 They believe
00:58:53.440 the climate
00:58:53.860 change risk.
00:58:54.680 They believe
00:58:55.080 the white
00:58:55.560 supremacists 0.96
00:58:56.200 under the
00:58:57.560 beds.
00:58:58.140 They believe
00:58:58.700 basically
00:59:00.220 everything.
00:59:01.820 I think
00:59:02.640 once you
00:59:03.020 get that
00:59:03.320 group worked
00:59:03.960 up and
00:59:04.980 they believe
00:59:05.440 every risk,
00:59:06.520 it's okay
00:59:08.120 as long as
00:59:08.700 they're not
00:59:08.980 in charge.
00:59:10.500 But you
00:59:11.220 know what
00:59:11.460 changed
00:59:11.820 recently?
00:59:12.940 A whole
00:59:13.880 bunch of 0.99
00:59:14.460 batshit crazy 1.00
00:59:15.360 women in 1.00
00:59:16.020 important jobs
00:59:16.840 like judges
00:59:17.640 and representatives
00:59:18.600 and mayors
00:59:19.540 and attorney
00:59:21.220 generals and
00:59:21.840 stuff.
00:59:23.180 And then
00:59:23.700 they're dangerous
00:59:24.360 because they
00:59:25.600 are a group
00:59:26.120 they are least
00:59:27.160 capable citizens
00:59:28.240 for protecting
00:59:29.680 us.
00:59:31.040 They seem
00:59:31.860 to have some
00:59:32.320 kind of natural
00:59:32.920 impulse, the
00:59:33.640 crazy, the 0.99
00:59:34.660 batshit crazy 1.00
00:59:35.440 mostly white 1.00
00:59:36.440 women. 0.81
00:59:37.140 They seem to
00:59:37.920 have some
00:59:38.200 natural impulse
00:59:38.980 for empathy
00:59:39.900 but without
00:59:41.240 the analytical
00:59:42.120 ability to
00:59:43.140 know that
00:59:43.740 their short
00:59:44.240 term actions
00:59:44.880 will destroy
00:59:45.560 us in the
00:59:46.020 end.
00:59:47.020 I believe
00:59:47.820 that men
00:59:48.260 are more
00:59:48.680 self-defense
00:59:49.500 oriented and
00:59:51.420 would look at
00:59:51.980 the border and
00:59:52.580 say, well,
00:59:53.860 close that.
00:59:54.540 And then
00:59:55.960 the batshit 1.00
00:59:56.440 crazy woman 1.00
00:59:57.100 would say, 0.99
00:59:57.880 well, but
00:59:58.680 everybody, it's
01:00:01.000 a country of
01:00:01.700 immigrants and
01:00:02.620 they built this
01:00:03.680 country, right?
01:00:06.040 And then
01:00:06.440 every single
01:00:07.160 man would
01:00:07.680 look at it
01:00:08.180 and say,
01:00:09.020 okay, but
01:00:09.440 do you see
01:00:09.940 all these
01:00:10.540 military-age
01:00:12.600 men coming
01:00:13.320 across the
01:00:13.820 border?
01:00:14.560 Just close
01:00:15.480 that.
01:00:16.180 Just stop
01:00:16.640 that.
01:00:18.000 You have
01:00:18.900 to be
01:00:19.300 batshit 0.97
01:00:19.860 crazy to 0.92
01:00:21.700 not want 0.72
01:00:22.120 to stop
01:00:22.740 the border
01:00:23.160 stuff.
01:00:24.600 There is
01:00:25.460 no rational
01:00:26.300 argument for
01:00:27.180 it, right?
01:00:28.380 It's
01:00:28.660 batshit
01:00:29.540 crazy. 1.00
01:00:30.940 Now, you 0.65
01:00:31.300 say, but 1.00
01:00:31.960 Scott, it's
01:00:32.500 not crazy
01:00:33.140 because it's
01:00:33.920 their plan
01:00:34.540 to change
01:00:35.820 the census
01:00:36.340 and get
01:00:36.820 more stuff.
01:00:37.780 No, it's
01:00:38.700 only the plan
01:00:39.460 of a few
01:00:39.960 people in
01:00:40.460 charge, maybe.
01:00:42.760 But for
01:00:43.440 that plan
01:00:43.960 to work,
01:00:44.960 they have
01:00:45.320 to scare
01:00:45.980 or confuse
01:00:47.620 or brainwash
01:00:48.740 batshit 1.00
01:00:49.820 crazy white 1.00
01:00:50.580 women until 1.00
01:00:51.820 the men in
01:00:52.820 the Democrat
01:00:53.340 Party are
01:00:54.120 too afraid
01:00:54.600 to say
01:00:54.940 anything to
01:00:55.400 them, because
01:00:56.500 we're all
01:00:57.440 afraid of
01:00:57.840 batshit 1.00
01:00:58.160 crazy white 1.00
01:00:59.100 women, and 1.00
01:01:00.680 then they
01:01:02.160 get too
01:01:02.460 much power.
01:01:06.020 It's sort
01:01:06.720 of like,
01:01:07.940 suppose society
01:01:09.200 decided that
01:01:09.920 most babysitters
01:01:10.960 should be
01:01:11.540 men.
01:01:13.180 What would
01:01:13.880 happen?
01:01:15.340 Most
01:01:15.640 babysitters
01:01:16.360 should be
01:01:16.820 men.
01:01:17.040 Well, in
01:01:18.500 most cases,
01:01:19.460 it would be
01:01:19.720 perfectly fine.
01:01:21.440 Most men
01:01:22.300 would just be
01:01:23.640 perfectly good
01:01:24.280 babysitters.
01:01:25.480 It might even
01:01:26.020 be better in
01:01:26.580 some cases,
01:01:27.580 right?
01:01:28.220 But wouldn't
01:01:29.680 you know for
01:01:30.380 sure that the
01:01:31.760 number of
01:01:32.600 horrible things
01:01:33.740 would go up?
01:01:35.780 Is there
01:01:36.120 anybody who
01:01:36.540 doesn't think
01:01:37.020 so?
01:01:37.940 There's not
01:01:38.500 one person who
01:01:39.200 doesn't agree
01:01:39.700 with me.
01:01:40.160 Not one.
01:01:41.200 Every single
01:01:41.940 person listening
01:01:42.560 knows that if
01:01:43.660 we change to
01:01:44.400 a mostly male
01:01:45.960 babysitting,
01:01:46.820 situation,
01:01:48.500 the crime
01:01:50.740 would go
01:01:51.060 through the
01:01:51.560 roof.
01:01:52.940 You all
01:01:53.360 know that.
01:01:54.660 But the
01:01:55.320 reverse is
01:01:55.920 true, too.
01:01:56.900 If you put
01:01:57.680 women in 0.62
01:01:58.400 charge of
01:01:58.940 physical
01:01:59.400 security,
01:02:00.280 you're 1.00
01:02:01.120 dead. 1.00
01:02:02.780 That's it.
01:02:04.280 Now, for the 1.00
01:02:04.880 dumb people, 1.00
01:02:05.920 give me a 1.00
01:02:07.420 moment to let 1.00
01:02:08.040 the dumb 1.00
01:02:08.340 people catch 1.00
01:02:08.820 up.
01:02:09.560 Once again,
01:02:10.300 it does not
01:02:10.920 mean that
01:02:11.480 every single
01:02:12.120 woman in
01:02:12.720 the world
01:02:13.280 could not
01:02:14.180 be a
01:02:14.480 police
01:02:14.760 officer or
01:02:15.640 a judge
01:02:16.380 and not
01:02:17.300 do a good
01:02:17.700 job.
01:02:18.180 Now, it
01:02:18.440 doesn't mean
01:02:18.780 that because
01:02:19.240 individuals are
01:02:20.060 infinitely different.
01:02:21.380 But we do
01:02:22.100 know that if
01:02:22.760 you made
01:02:23.060 all babysitters
01:02:23.900 men, there 0.95
01:02:24.520 would be a
01:02:24.800 lot of baby 0.99
01:02:25.300 raping going 1.00
01:02:25.920 on.
01:02:26.420 And we do
01:02:27.020 know that if
01:02:27.520 you put 0.93
01:02:27.840 batshit crazy 1.00
01:02:28.840 white women 1.00
01:02:29.420 in charge of
01:02:29.980 physical security,
01:02:31.220 you're 1.00
01:02:31.680 fucking dead. 1.00
01:02:33.460 You are 1.00
01:02:34.120 fucking dead. 1.00
01:02:35.420 And the 1.00
01:02:38.660 reason we
01:02:39.060 don't is
01:02:39.460 we're afraid
01:02:39.880 of batshit 1.00
01:02:40.380 crazy women 1.00
01:02:41.020 because you 1.00
01:02:41.880 just can't
01:02:42.280 say it out
01:02:42.640 loud.
01:02:43.940 But I
01:02:44.520 can.
01:02:46.280 That's why
01:02:46.840 I'm here.
01:02:48.780 Because when
01:02:49.360 they canceled
01:02:49.860 me, they
01:02:50.240 made me
01:02:50.560 more powerful.
01:02:54.120 More siloed,
01:02:55.640 but a lot
01:02:56.260 more powerful.
01:02:58.820 And I get
01:02:59.520 to say what
01:03:00.000 you can't
01:03:00.460 say.
01:03:01.760 Now, the
01:03:02.320 reason that
01:03:02.940 James Carville
01:03:04.400 can say what
01:03:05.080 I said in
01:03:05.700 his own
01:03:06.160 James Carville
01:03:07.140 way, the
01:03:08.060 reason he
01:03:08.440 can say it
01:03:09.060 is that he's
01:03:10.560 100 years
01:03:11.160 old and near
01:03:11.700 death and
01:03:12.120 he doesn't 1.00
01:03:12.460 give a fuck 1.00
01:03:12.920 what you 1.00
01:03:13.240 think.
01:03:14.820 That's why
01:03:15.380 he can say
01:03:15.840 it.
01:03:16.340 So he's
01:03:16.780 also in
01:03:17.280 this weird,
01:03:17.860 weird, strange
01:03:18.700 place where
01:03:19.840 he can just 1.00
01:03:20.300 say shit 1.00
01:03:21.260 because he's 1.00
01:03:21.900 an old man.
01:03:23.760 And I got
01:03:24.880 that going
01:03:25.260 for me too.
01:03:27.060 Now, do
01:03:27.720 you know that
01:03:28.160 not a single
01:03:28.800 person has
01:03:29.500 pushed back
01:03:30.060 on me in
01:03:31.660 months of
01:03:33.340 me saying in
01:03:33.980 public that
01:03:34.700 the big
01:03:35.060 problem is
01:03:35.840 batshit 1.00
01:03:36.300 crazy white 1.00
01:03:36.960 women? 1.00
01:03:38.900 No pushback.
01:03:41.260 No pushback.
01:03:42.500 Do you know
01:03:42.820 why?
01:03:43.380 You all
01:03:44.220 know it.
01:03:46.500 You all
01:03:47.280 know it.
01:03:48.420 We all
01:03:49.020 know it.
01:03:50.800 And you
01:03:51.880 can't let the
01:03:52.460 people who
01:03:53.080 can't figure
01:03:53.640 out why
01:03:54.180 DEI doesn't
01:03:55.140 work, that's
01:03:57.040 just a logic
01:03:57.660 problem.
01:03:58.340 It's like a
01:03:58.840 supply and
01:03:59.400 demand problem.
01:04:00.320 You can't let
01:04:00.980 those people be
01:04:01.620 in charge.
01:04:02.240 If you
01:04:03.280 can't solve
01:04:04.180 why DEI
01:04:05.180 is only
01:04:05.920 bad and
01:04:06.940 never good
01:04:07.780 at all,
01:04:08.860 if that's
01:04:09.300 not obvious
01:04:09.960 to you
01:04:10.420 based on
01:04:11.240 your education
01:04:12.100 and your
01:04:12.480 experience,
01:04:13.680 my God,
01:04:14.320 you shouldn't
01:04:14.660 be in
01:04:14.960 charge.
01:04:15.320 So, speaking
01:04:21.520 of that,
01:04:23.480 North Korea
01:04:24.080 says there's
01:04:27.020 a proposition
01:04:27.600 from Japan's
01:04:29.720 prime minister
01:04:30.240 to have a
01:04:31.080 summit with
01:04:31.760 Kim Jong-un.
01:04:33.100 That would be
01:04:33.860 kind of a
01:04:34.360 really big
01:04:34.780 deal if
01:04:36.400 Japan and
01:04:36.960 North Korea
01:04:37.500 decided to
01:04:38.180 get along,
01:04:38.640 because their
01:04:39.100 history is
01:04:39.740 really bad.
01:04:41.740 So, that's
01:04:44.000 a step in
01:04:44.500 the right
01:04:44.680 direction.
01:04:45.940 Would you
01:04:46.760 agree that
01:04:47.420 Trump solved
01:04:48.520 North Korea? 0.67
01:04:51.120 Have you
01:04:51.480 noticed we
01:04:51.960 haven't really
01:04:52.660 had a, like
01:04:53.460 they've been
01:04:53.880 testing some
01:04:54.480 missiles, but
01:04:56.040 we don't worry
01:04:56.680 about it,
01:04:57.100 because we
01:04:57.440 never gave
01:04:58.380 them a reason
01:04:58.900 to send the
01:04:59.520 missile our
01:04:59.920 way.
01:05:00.680 We just
01:05:01.340 don't give
01:05:01.700 them any
01:05:02.020 reason.
01:05:03.160 And Trump
01:05:03.580 did that.
01:05:04.520 He basically
01:05:05.040 took away the
01:05:05.680 reason.
01:05:07.260 How about we
01:05:07.780 just be
01:05:08.100 friends?
01:05:10.100 And Kim
01:05:10.420 Jong-un
01:05:10.840 is over
01:05:11.220 there thinking,
01:05:12.380 well, yeah,
01:05:13.640 why wouldn't
01:05:14.260 we be?
01:05:16.140 So, I
01:05:16.920 think the
01:05:17.280 Japan move
01:05:17.980 is probably
01:05:18.440 just, you
01:05:19.000 know, sort
01:05:19.480 of a classic
01:05:20.880 Japanese
01:05:21.880 cautious, wait
01:05:23.680 a few years,
01:05:24.360 see what
01:05:24.620 happens, and
01:05:25.300 now it's
01:05:25.680 time to
01:05:26.000 make a
01:05:26.300 move.
01:05:27.120 And I
01:05:27.440 think this
01:05:27.800 is probably
01:05:28.240 a continuation
01:05:28.940 of Trump's
01:05:31.060 reframing
01:05:32.260 North Korea
01:05:32.920 as our
01:05:33.420 little buddy.
01:05:35.520 Right?
01:05:36.260 He literally
01:05:37.020 reframed
01:05:37.820 North Korea
01:05:38.760 as our
01:05:39.480 little friend.
01:05:40.840 And then
01:05:41.500 we stopped
01:05:42.040 worrying about
01:05:42.500 them.
01:05:43.060 That's all
01:05:43.420 it took.
01:05:44.940 And Japan's 0.65
01:05:45.840 pushing that
01:05:46.300 a little
01:05:46.480 further.
01:05:47.060 Good.
01:05:47.540 Good for
01:05:47.900 them.
01:05:49.940 Axios had
01:05:50.600 an interesting
01:05:51.960 article about
01:05:52.700 all the
01:05:53.100 bubbles that
01:05:53.740 have formed.
01:05:54.380 So, these
01:05:54.680 are groups
01:05:55.260 of people
01:05:55.700 who are
01:05:56.540 mostly talking
01:05:57.240 to themselves
01:05:57.880 or their
01:05:58.420 little power
01:05:58.920 groups.
01:05:59.740 Now, it
01:06:00.180 mentioned some
01:06:01.040 left-leaning
01:06:02.140 bubbles as well,
01:06:03.060 but they
01:06:03.300 weren't very
01:06:03.840 interesting.
01:06:04.880 I'll just
01:06:05.340 tell you the
01:06:05.840 right-leaning
01:06:06.540 bubbles the
01:06:07.680 way Axios
01:06:08.420 sees it.
01:06:09.520 Now, what's
01:06:10.060 interesting about
01:06:10.760 this is the
01:06:11.620 way they
01:06:12.380 see it.
01:06:13.820 Because I
01:06:14.380 want to see
01:06:14.680 if it's the
01:06:14.980 way you
01:06:15.280 see it.
01:06:15.980 Because I
01:06:16.400 don't think
01:06:16.700 the left
01:06:17.200 understands
01:06:18.540 anything about
01:06:19.280 the right.
01:06:20.640 It might be
01:06:21.520 true the
01:06:21.920 other way,
01:06:22.960 that the
01:06:23.300 right doesn't
01:06:23.800 really understand
01:06:24.440 the left,
01:06:25.360 but I don't
01:06:25.840 feel it.
01:06:27.240 I feel like
01:06:27.920 the right
01:06:29.140 completely
01:06:29.800 understands the
01:06:30.580 left, but I
01:06:32.240 might have
01:06:32.600 cognitive dissonance
01:06:33.660 about that.
01:06:34.760 I don't have
01:06:35.400 confidence in
01:06:36.100 that.
01:06:36.320 It just feels
01:06:36.780 that way.
01:06:37.860 Now, I
01:06:38.380 say that
01:06:38.760 because the
01:06:39.340 right sees
01:06:40.660 their own
01:06:41.040 news, plus
01:06:41.760 they almost
01:06:42.400 always see
01:06:42.940 all of the
01:06:43.460 news on
01:06:44.020 the left
01:06:44.400 because it's
01:06:44.860 the dominant
01:06:45.420 news source.
01:06:47.760 But it
01:06:48.320 doesn't work
01:06:48.720 the other
01:06:48.960 way.
01:06:50.140 So here's
01:06:50.780 what Axios
01:06:51.240 says is the
01:06:52.200 bubbles.
01:06:52.720 The quote
01:06:53.140 musketeers.
01:06:55.160 So these
01:06:55.880 are sort
01:06:56.660 of musk
01:06:57.500 liking people,
01:06:59.360 I guess.
01:07:00.420 And they
01:07:01.020 say this is
01:07:01.500 a fast-growing
01:07:02.200 mostly male
01:07:02.880 group who
01:07:03.920 feed off
01:07:04.400 Twitter.
01:07:05.280 Come on.
01:07:06.040 Axios, you
01:07:10.500 have
01:07:10.720 editors.
01:07:12.380 Am I
01:07:13.080 right?
01:07:14.380 A brand
01:07:14.820 new article,
01:07:15.900 you have
01:07:16.780 editors, and
01:07:18.300 they're calling
01:07:18.780 X Twitter?
01:07:20.920 Literally?
01:07:22.280 The writer
01:07:23.040 didn't notice
01:07:23.640 that that was
01:07:24.080 wrong, and
01:07:24.660 the editor
01:07:25.260 didn't catch
01:07:25.780 it?
01:07:26.680 How in the
01:07:27.440 world?
01:07:28.340 Anyway, so
01:07:30.560 it says a
01:07:31.600 fast-growing
01:07:32.140 mostly male
01:07:32.920 group of
01:07:33.500 podcasters
01:07:34.300 and Twitter
01:07:34.960 users, it
01:07:35.620 says, especially 1.00
01:07:37.360 the all-in
01:07:38.160 group and
01:07:39.320 Joe Rogan, and
01:07:40.640 they follow
01:07:41.060 independent
01:07:41.440 reporters led
01:07:42.220 by Barry
01:07:42.740 Weiss through
01:07:44.080 social media or
01:07:44.980 newsletters.
01:07:46.140 Would you
01:07:47.100 agree that
01:07:47.760 that is a
01:07:48.780 category?
01:07:50.380 Does that
01:07:50.760 sound like a
01:07:51.280 bubble to
01:07:51.680 you?
01:07:53.380 A little
01:07:54.020 bit.
01:07:54.840 A little
01:07:55.260 bit.
01:07:55.600 I'll give
01:07:55.960 them that
01:07:56.160 one.
01:07:57.260 I'm not
01:07:57.940 sure what
01:07:58.280 the specific
01:07:59.460 names that
01:08:00.100 they put
01:08:00.420 there, or
01:08:02.860 maybe not
01:08:03.440 as representative
01:08:04.220 as they
01:08:04.600 could be, but
01:08:05.240 basic idea.
01:08:06.440 Yeah, there's
01:08:07.040 definitely a
01:08:07.820 group of
01:08:08.960 people who
01:08:09.460 would agree
01:08:10.060 with Musk,
01:08:10.840 but what
01:08:11.380 would be a
01:08:11.820 better way to
01:08:12.440 describe that
01:08:13.200 group?
01:08:14.980 If you were
01:08:15.640 going to
01:08:15.820 describe them
01:08:16.540 in a way
01:08:16.960 that wasn't,
01:08:17.860 oh, let's
01:08:18.360 say, biased,
01:08:19.540 how would
01:08:20.480 you describe
01:08:20.960 that group?
01:08:21.380 The all-in
01:08:21.880 podcast, Joe
01:08:22.960 Rogan, and
01:08:24.240 the people,
01:08:24.960 Barry Weiss,
01:08:25.700 and people who
01:08:26.160 follow Musk?
01:08:28.560 What do they
01:08:29.160 have in
01:08:29.460 common?
01:08:30.420 I'll tell
01:08:33.080 you what
01:08:33.340 they have
01:08:33.600 in common.
01:08:35.680 They're all
01:08:36.380 moderates.
01:08:38.580 They're all
01:08:39.200 moderates.
01:08:40.160 Why wouldn't
01:08:40.600 you call
01:08:40.960 this the
01:08:41.480 moderate
01:08:41.920 people who
01:08:42.580 are not
01:08:43.000 batshit
01:08:43.460 crazy? 1.00
01:08:44.540 Do you 0.94
01:08:44.760 know what
01:08:44.980 the all-in
01:08:45.620 pod has
01:08:46.240 in common?
01:08:48.560 It's not
01:08:49.240 their love
01:08:49.720 for Elon
01:08:50.220 Musk, although
01:08:51.340 they obviously
01:08:52.340 like him.
01:08:53.580 No, what
01:08:54.040 they have in
01:08:54.460 common is
01:08:55.040 they're smart
01:08:55.920 people who
01:08:56.620 don't have
01:08:57.100 crazy opinions
01:08:58.120 about anything.
01:08:59.260 You could
01:08:59.620 disagree with
01:09:00.200 them, but
01:09:01.300 they show
01:09:01.660 their work
01:09:02.120 and none
01:09:02.480 of it's
01:09:02.720 crazy.
01:09:03.940 What does
01:09:04.260 Elon Musk
01:09:04.920 have that
01:09:07.280 makes him
01:09:07.720 sort of
01:09:08.080 different in
01:09:08.600 politics?
01:09:09.920 Well, he
01:09:10.280 listed his
01:09:10.960 views the
01:09:11.420 other day
01:09:11.860 and they're
01:09:12.380 completely
01:09:12.880 middle of
01:09:13.360 the road.
01:09:14.740 Stuff like
01:09:15.660 don't do
01:09:18.560 gender
01:09:19.020 surgery on
01:09:19.740 minors.
01:09:21.040 That happens
01:09:22.000 to be the
01:09:22.440 dominant
01:09:22.800 American view.
01:09:23.680 immigration
01:09:26.200 should be
01:09:27.020 controlled,
01:09:27.720 etc.
01:09:28.060 These are
01:09:28.600 the most
01:09:29.020 common
01:09:30.000 dominant
01:09:31.360 American
01:09:32.040 views.
01:09:33.560 Instead of
01:09:34.200 saying there's
01:09:34.820 a bubble
01:09:35.820 of people
01:09:36.480 who have
01:09:37.640 real high
01:09:38.180 common
01:09:38.500 sense,
01:09:39.640 and hold
01:09:39.960 on,
01:09:41.020 who else
01:09:41.520 follows
01:09:41.900 Musk? 0.97
01:09:43.560 High IQ
01:09:44.220 people.
01:09:46.140 Am I
01:09:46.520 right?
01:09:47.480 The all-in
01:09:48.060 podcast, if
01:09:48.840 you added up
01:09:49.420 their four
01:09:50.120 IQs, it's 0.99
01:09:50.820 like a
01:09:51.340 thousand.
01:09:53.760 Like the
01:09:54.340 smartest
01:09:54.600 people in
01:09:55.360 one podcast
01:09:56.100 ever.
01:09:57.300 And, you
01:09:58.160 know, then
01:09:58.540 there's
01:09:59.100 Elon Musk.
01:10:00.280 And then
01:10:00.580 name the
01:10:01.640 other people
01:10:02.180 who are
01:10:02.660 well-known
01:10:04.360 for, let's
01:10:05.680 say, interacting
01:10:06.420 in his
01:10:06.980 circle of
01:10:07.880 social media.
01:10:10.080 They're all
01:10:10.840 the dominant
01:10:11.920 ones are
01:10:13.700 not just
01:10:14.280 average.
01:10:15.660 They are the
01:10:16.600 smartest
01:10:17.100 podcasters
01:10:18.140 by far.
01:10:19.440 Now, I'm
01:10:19.680 going to
01:10:19.840 throw a
01:10:20.700 Joe Rogan
01:10:21.180 in the
01:10:21.640 smartest
01:10:22.020 podcasters.
01:10:23.340 Because I've
01:10:23.920 said for
01:10:24.220 years, one
01:10:24.700 of the
01:10:24.920 smartest
01:10:25.220 things that
01:10:25.780 Joe Rogan
01:10:26.240 does is
01:10:27.660 he presents
01:10:28.480 himself as
01:10:29.200 a person
01:10:30.080 who's not
01:10:30.480 as smart
01:10:30.860 as he
01:10:31.140 actually is
01:10:31.780 because he's
01:10:32.700 super smart.
01:10:35.120 But he
01:10:35.820 has that
01:10:36.260 common
01:10:36.660 touch where
01:10:37.620 he can
01:10:37.920 relate to
01:10:38.760 people across
01:10:39.340 all different
01:10:39.780 barriers.
01:10:40.880 So, you
01:10:42.960 could have
01:10:43.400 said, these
01:10:44.660 are the
01:10:45.040 smartest
01:10:45.840 moderates
01:10:46.600 in politics.
01:10:48.420 Am I
01:10:49.080 right?
01:10:49.300 Would
01:10:50.920 that be
01:10:51.780 inaccurate?
01:10:53.720 Yeah, Jordan
01:10:54.400 Peterson.
01:10:55.460 The people
01:10:56.540 who are the
01:10:57.180 musketeers, as
01:10:58.220 they call
01:10:58.600 them, to 0.58
01:10:59.020 try to find
01:10:59.580 a way to
01:10:59.900 make it
01:11:00.180 sound bad,
01:11:00.980 are the
01:11:02.080 smartest, best
01:11:03.480 people.
01:11:03.980 How about
01:11:04.260 the one
01:11:04.740 independent
01:11:06.080 reporter, Barry
01:11:07.400 Weiss?
01:11:08.740 One of the
01:11:09.440 best.
01:11:10.640 They don't
01:11:11.100 mention that?
01:11:12.400 Why don't you
01:11:12.740 mention that the
01:11:13.440 one reporter is
01:11:14.240 like a
01:11:15.260 superstar among
01:11:16.140 the reporters?
01:11:16.640 Yeah.
01:11:19.360 Here's the
01:11:19.880 other category.
01:11:21.040 The MAGA
01:11:21.680 mind melders.
01:11:23.100 Okay, the
01:11:23.500 fact that
01:11:23.900 they're going
01:11:24.740 to use MAGA
01:11:25.380 in that at
01:11:25.920 all is,
01:11:27.240 you know,
01:11:27.480 already you
01:11:28.340 know what's
01:11:28.660 coming, right?
01:11:30.060 The new
01:11:30.480 conservative
01:11:30.920 ecosystem would
01:11:32.600 seem like a
01:11:33.200 distant planet
01:11:33.980 to anyone whose
01:11:35.220 habits were
01:11:35.720 formed pre-Trump.
01:11:37.460 And here are
01:11:37.880 the names that
01:11:38.540 they put in
01:11:38.960 this category.
01:11:40.200 People like,
01:11:42.300 now they're
01:11:42.900 going to name
01:11:43.280 some people,
01:11:44.280 and they're
01:11:44.620 going to say
01:11:45.020 people like
01:11:45.760 them.
01:11:48.080 That's such
01:11:48.760 a Democrat
01:11:49.240 thing to do
01:11:49.980 because there's
01:11:52.080 nobody like
01:11:52.900 any of the
01:11:53.420 people that
01:11:53.860 they're going
01:11:54.120 to mention,
01:11:55.440 right?
01:11:55.660 So they
01:11:55.940 start out
01:11:56.320 with people
01:11:57.140 like Charlie
01:11:57.960 Kirk.
01:11:58.740 Well, who's
01:11:59.380 the other
01:11:59.700 Charlie Kirk?
01:12:01.400 Come on.
01:12:03.280 He's pretty
01:12:04.100 unique.
01:12:05.160 Like, like
01:12:05.940 him or not,
01:12:08.060 he's kind
01:12:08.860 of unique.
01:12:10.380 And the
01:12:11.380 others are
01:12:11.800 as well.
01:12:12.480 They mentioned
01:12:12.940 Jack Posobiec
01:12:13.760 and Mike
01:12:15.300 Cernovich.
01:12:19.540 Is Mike
01:12:20.380 Cernovich
01:12:20.820 MAGA?
01:12:23.840 I think
01:12:24.700 Mike Cernovich
01:12:25.220 is just one
01:12:25.960 of the
01:12:26.180 smartest people
01:12:26.900 who can
01:12:27.400 see the
01:12:27.740 whole field.
01:12:30.540 To throw
01:12:31.540 Cernovich in
01:12:32.380 with a, you
01:12:33.560 know, a
01:12:33.880 cult,
01:12:34.360 basically,
01:12:34.940 that's not
01:12:36.040 fair.
01:12:36.640 And it also
01:12:37.100 doesn't understand
01:12:38.180 him, right?
01:12:39.140 It's a complete
01:12:40.260 lack of
01:12:40.680 understanding.
01:12:41.120 They also
01:12:42.300 mention Laura
01:12:43.360 Loomer, Alex
01:12:44.480 Bruzwitz, never 0.98
01:12:45.680 heard of him,
01:12:46.980 Tucker Carlson,
01:12:48.240 Don Jr.
01:12:50.080 Does that
01:12:50.680 seem like,
01:12:52.220 yeah, that's
01:12:52.720 a pretty good
01:12:53.180 grouping.
01:12:53.980 I mean, I
01:12:54.460 can see why
01:12:55.360 they would
01:12:55.700 group them
01:12:56.560 as like-minded
01:12:57.840 in many ways.
01:13:00.140 But what
01:13:00.580 would be
01:13:00.940 another way
01:13:01.640 to describe
01:13:02.320 this group
01:13:03.020 of people?
01:13:06.240 How about
01:13:07.120 open-minded,
01:13:09.440 super-smart,
01:13:12.900 well-informed,
01:13:14.600 red-pilled,
01:13:16.100 usually-right?
01:13:19.180 How about
01:13:19.520 usually-right?
01:13:21.280 I mean, there's
01:13:21.680 a lot you
01:13:22.060 could say
01:13:22.360 about this
01:13:22.800 group, but
01:13:24.620 they decide
01:13:25.900 to make it
01:13:26.480 mega-mind-melders
01:13:27.780 like they're,
01:13:29.900 I don't know
01:13:30.460 what the
01:13:30.700 mind-melder
01:13:31.260 part is.
01:13:31.780 And they
01:13:37.100 talk about
01:13:38.080 Breitbart
01:13:38.940 and Steve
01:13:39.600 Bannon's
01:13:39.960 War Room.
01:13:40.920 And then they
01:13:41.580 talk about
01:13:41.980 Rush Limbaugh
01:13:42.660 grandpas,
01:13:43.660 you know,
01:13:43.880 grandpas who
01:13:44.540 would have
01:13:44.880 been watching
01:13:45.400 Rush Limbaugh
01:13:46.420 if he was
01:13:46.760 still around.
01:13:48.140 Now, I
01:13:49.720 wasn't
01:13:49.980 mentioned.
01:13:51.500 Which
01:13:52.020 category am
01:13:52.680 I in?
01:13:55.460 Am I a
01:13:56.680 musketeer,
01:13:58.520 a mega-mind-melder,
01:13:59.920 a
01:14:01.780 or Rush
01:14:03.240 Limbaugh
01:14:03.680 grandpa?
01:14:05.800 All of the
01:14:06.660 above.
01:14:07.960 All of the
01:14:08.500 above.
01:14:09.240 Yeah.
01:14:09.620 The trouble
01:14:10.100 is that I
01:14:11.760 do think
01:14:12.180 categories are
01:14:13.080 sort of useful
01:14:13.860 for understanding
01:14:14.580 things, but as
01:14:15.540 soon as you
01:14:16.000 say a person's
01:14:16.960 in a category,
01:14:17.940 you're really
01:14:18.920 minimizing the
01:14:20.660 individuality of
01:14:21.740 that person.
01:14:23.220 I like to
01:14:24.300 think I could
01:14:24.780 be in any
01:14:25.360 category at
01:14:26.240 any given
01:14:26.720 time based
01:14:27.320 on the
01:14:27.640 topic.
01:14:29.000 Do you
01:14:29.380 know what
01:14:29.600 Democrats don't
01:14:30.500 want to
01:14:30.900 allow is a
01:14:31.700 possibility
01:14:32.240 that people
01:14:33.780 could make
01:14:34.200 decisions based
01:14:35.120 on the
01:14:35.620 facts instead
01:14:37.060 of their
01:14:37.480 party
01:14:37.900 affiliation?
01:14:39.960 Ah, now
01:14:41.240 you understand
01:14:41.840 what Axios
01:14:42.580 just did
01:14:43.140 here, don't
01:14:43.600 you?
01:14:44.560 They tried
01:14:45.260 to make
01:14:45.720 being smart
01:14:47.100 political,
01:14:49.220 as in you're
01:14:50.400 just a team
01:14:50.880 player.
01:14:51.940 So they
01:14:52.220 say, instead
01:14:52.900 of saying the
01:14:54.080 smartest people
01:14:54.960 are all banding
01:14:56.160 together in
01:14:56.980 what I call
01:14:57.500 the internet
01:14:58.000 dads,
01:14:58.460 the internet
01:15:01.000 dads, they
01:15:01.940 decided to
01:15:02.500 call them
01:15:02.980 basically
01:15:03.680 Musk, you
01:15:05.620 know, cult
01:15:06.060 members or
01:15:06.620 something to
01:15:07.560 make it sound
01:15:08.120 bad.
01:15:09.080 The other
01:15:09.960 way to tell
01:15:10.540 this story is
01:15:11.600 there's a large
01:15:12.280 group of
01:15:12.700 people, many
01:15:13.820 of them who
01:15:14.500 used to vote
01:15:15.420 Democrat, who
01:15:17.400 can't buy on to 0.97
01:15:18.420 the crazy
01:15:18.940 batshit parts of 0.89
01:15:19.880 the Democrat, but
01:15:21.180 they're not full
01:15:22.080 right wingers,
01:15:23.340 they're just
01:15:24.000 looking at what
01:15:24.580 works.
01:15:25.920 So the
01:15:26.300 all-in
01:15:26.660 podcast, Joe
01:15:27.720 Rogan, Barry
01:15:28.420 Weiss, and
01:15:29.620 Musk, what
01:15:30.340 would be one
01:15:30.840 thing they all
01:15:31.340 have in common?
01:15:32.760 They'd like
01:15:33.420 border security
01:15:34.240 to be better.
01:15:36.700 So does that
01:15:37.560 make them
01:15:38.000 Musketeers?
01:15:40.960 No, it
01:15:41.660 makes them
01:15:42.060 Americans who
01:15:42.840 are paying
01:15:43.140 attention.
01:15:45.140 Like calling
01:15:45.680 them musketeers 0.97
01:15:46.560 is a way to
01:15:47.200 minimize them
01:15:48.040 as some
01:15:49.080 kind of
01:15:49.400 joiners of
01:15:50.380 some kind
01:15:50.760 of weird
01:15:51.060 cult or
01:15:51.600 something.
01:15:52.420 How about
01:15:52.900 the smartest
01:15:53.980 people in
01:15:54.600 the world
01:15:55.120 have found
01:15:56.420 each other
01:15:56.940 because that's
01:15:58.080 what happened.
01:15:59.400 The thing
01:16:00.120 that X and
01:16:01.100 Musk allowed 1.00
01:16:02.440 people to do
01:16:03.240 is for the
01:16:03.900 smart people
01:16:04.400 to find each
01:16:04.960 other.
01:16:05.920 Do you know
01:16:06.280 how I know
01:16:06.880 that the
01:16:07.400 all-in
01:16:07.760 podcast is
01:16:08.600 awesome?
01:16:09.620 Because I
01:16:10.220 found them
01:16:10.740 on X.
01:16:12.280 I wouldn't
01:16:12.540 have found
01:16:12.820 them otherwise.
01:16:13.880 Do you know
01:16:14.220 how I know
01:16:14.700 that you're
01:16:16.200 going to get
01:16:16.520 a good scoop
01:16:17.220 from Jack
01:16:17.860 Posabek and
01:16:18.780 that Tucker
01:16:20.740 is awesome?
01:16:22.240 Because I'm
01:16:22.860 on X.
01:16:23.320 X is the
01:16:24.680 way we
01:16:24.980 find each
01:16:25.660 other.
01:16:27.080 But the
01:16:27.800 dominant
01:16:28.320 thing that
01:16:29.360 keeps us
01:16:29.800 together as
01:16:31.120 an entity
01:16:31.880 that has
01:16:32.380 power is
01:16:33.960 that the
01:16:34.420 smart people
01:16:34.940 are all
01:16:35.280 on one
01:16:35.560 team.
01:16:38.720 The smart
01:16:39.440 people aren't
01:16:40.000 lying.
01:16:41.280 I look at
01:16:41.860 people like
01:16:42.280 Lawrence
01:16:42.640 Tribe, who
01:16:45.280 I would assume
01:16:45.900 could beat me
01:16:46.500 in an IQ
01:16:46.960 test.
01:16:48.160 Smart guy.
01:16:48.800 But when
01:16:50.220 you listen
01:16:50.600 to him,
01:16:51.140 you think,
01:16:51.720 oh, there's
01:16:52.540 something wrong
01:16:52.960 here.
01:16:53.960 There's
01:16:54.160 something wrong
01:16:54.520 with that
01:16:54.800 guy.
01:16:55.280 But it's
01:16:55.540 probably not
01:16:55.940 IQ.
01:16:57.260 So there's
01:16:57.860 something about
01:16:58.460 being smart
01:16:59.640 enough and
01:17:00.320 also honest
01:17:01.100 enough that
01:17:02.440 you can look
01:17:02.900 at the
01:17:03.140 costs and
01:17:03.520 the benefits
01:17:03.920 of any
01:17:04.380 situation.
01:17:05.900 So I
01:17:06.600 would
01:17:06.780 characterize it
01:17:07.840 this way.
01:17:08.400 Smart people
01:17:09.160 who are
01:17:10.100 willing to
01:17:10.640 entertain both
01:17:11.400 the costs
01:17:12.000 and the
01:17:12.540 benefits of
01:17:13.340 any important
01:17:13.920 topic are a
01:17:15.540 rare group
01:17:16.140 and there
01:17:17.280 are not
01:17:17.460 many people
01:17:17.900 who can
01:17:18.140 do it.
01:17:19.300 Do you
01:17:19.460 know what's
01:17:19.760 interesting
01:17:20.100 about the
01:17:20.540 All In
01:17:20.900 podcast is
01:17:22.600 that every
01:17:23.080 member of
01:17:23.720 the All In
01:17:24.140 podcast has
01:17:25.460 the analytical
01:17:26.160 abilities that
01:17:28.420 they can tear
01:17:29.020 apart a
01:17:29.580 complicated thing
01:17:30.420 and give you
01:17:30.940 some value
01:17:31.720 to it.
01:17:32.740 And it
01:17:33.100 won't be
01:17:33.700 some Democrat
01:17:35.100 view or even
01:17:35.780 a Republican
01:17:36.280 view.
01:17:36.780 It will be
01:17:37.120 non-political.
01:17:38.200 It will be
01:17:38.560 entirely what
01:17:39.260 works and
01:17:39.660 what doesn't.
01:17:41.120 And that,
01:17:42.400 if that's
01:17:43.420 powerful,
01:17:44.840 thank God,
01:17:45.660 if that's
01:17:48.140 like a
01:17:48.460 power center
01:17:49.180 that's
01:17:49.600 forming,
01:17:50.940 thank God
01:17:51.800 we've been
01:17:52.460 waiting for
01:17:52.880 that.
01:17:55.480 Anyway, 0.93
01:17:56.940 Mad Liberals 0.95
01:17:57.940 and Account
01:17:58.440 on X
01:17:59.160 has been
01:17:59.580 doing a lot
01:18:00.000 of work
01:18:00.280 looking for
01:18:01.280 irregularities
01:18:02.320 in that
01:18:02.600 2020 election
01:18:04.200 and has
01:18:05.440 produced a
01:18:06.000 205-page
01:18:07.720 report of
01:18:08.860 his findings
01:18:09.620 that,
01:18:11.040 in his
01:18:11.340 view,
01:18:11.740 would
01:18:12.020 substantiate
01:18:13.600 the
01:18:14.800 irregularities
01:18:15.640 of the
01:18:16.020 2020
01:18:16.540 election.
01:18:17.660 Now,
01:18:18.040 I asked
01:18:18.380 him for
01:18:18.680 a summary.
01:18:20.260 He said
01:18:20.560 a quick
01:18:20.880 summary is
01:18:21.440 that after
01:18:21.880 analyzing
01:18:22.360 over 80
01:18:23.020 counties,
01:18:24.480 he says
01:18:25.100 he found
01:18:25.620 8,000
01:18:26.280 double-scanned
01:18:27.080 ballots,
01:18:28.580 and more
01:18:31.420 than 8,000
01:18:32.260 ballots are
01:18:32.960 missing in
01:18:33.520 the recount,
01:18:35.240 and 6,000
01:18:36.180 new ballots
01:18:36.640 added to
01:18:37.020 the recount,
01:18:37.680 and over
01:18:37.940 300 test
01:18:38.620 ballots added
01:18:39.140 to the
01:18:39.360 recount,
01:18:40.540 and over
01:18:40.920 350 ballots
01:18:42.120 overwritten
01:18:42.580 ballots.
01:18:43.060 So there
01:18:44.360 were a
01:18:45.600 number of
01:18:46.200 double-scanned
01:18:47.800 and overridden
01:18:48.680 stuff.
01:18:50.820 Now,
01:18:51.580 what do I
01:18:52.760 always say
01:18:53.180 about election
01:18:53.960 irregularity
01:18:54.920 claims?
01:18:55.440 I'll say it
01:18:56.040 again.
01:18:57.180 I don't know
01:18:58.140 what's true
01:18:58.660 and what's
01:18:59.020 not,
01:18:59.680 because I
01:19:00.020 have no
01:19:00.320 way to
01:19:00.960 validate
01:19:01.560 or have
01:19:02.820 an opinion
01:19:03.180 on any
01:19:03.660 of it.
01:19:03.900 but you
01:19:09.100 should assume
01:19:09.740 that every
01:19:10.340 claim has a
01:19:12.380 95 to 100
01:19:13.360 percent chance
01:19:13.980 of being
01:19:14.360 false.
01:19:16.300 So there
01:19:18.360 might be
01:19:18.680 something here,
01:19:19.480 but it would
01:19:20.480 be the 50th
01:19:21.400 time I've
01:19:21.800 said,
01:19:22.040 oh,
01:19:22.200 there might
01:19:22.460 be something
01:19:22.800 here,
01:19:23.640 only to find
01:19:24.280 out that my
01:19:25.220 original estimate
01:19:26.180 that almost
01:19:26.860 everything would
01:19:27.520 turn out not
01:19:28.180 to pan out
01:19:29.120 so far.
01:19:31.140 So far,
01:19:31.900 most of it's
01:19:32.380 not panned
01:19:32.780 out,
01:19:32.980 but there
01:19:33.680 are a number
01:19:34.040 of things
01:19:34.400 that are,
01:19:34.780 let's say,
01:19:35.320 pending,
01:19:36.080 and this is
01:19:36.520 one of them,
01:19:37.840 that are sort
01:19:38.320 of floating out
01:19:39.020 there and
01:19:39.460 have not
01:19:39.760 been debunked.
01:19:42.780 So there is a
01:19:43.640 category of
01:19:44.300 things that
01:19:44.640 have not
01:19:44.960 been debunked,
01:19:46.020 which is
01:19:47.140 different from
01:19:47.840 proving something.
01:19:56.340 All right,
01:19:56.980 just look at
01:19:57.400 some of your
01:19:57.680 comments.
01:20:02.980 you're afraid
01:20:07.860 to say what's
01:20:08.540 true because
01:20:09.160 you're afraid
01:20:09.600 of actually
01:20:10.160 being canceled,
01:20:11.000 not fake
01:20:11.480 canceled like
01:20:12.460 you cry about.
01:20:13.660 No,
01:20:14.020 actually, 1.00
01:20:14.600 you fucking 1.00
01:20:15.000 asshole, 1.00
01:20:15.840 stop reading 1.00
01:20:16.400 my mind.
01:20:17.480 I'm actually
01:20:18.180 telling you my
01:20:18.800 actual opinion.
01:20:19.960 What you have
01:20:20.720 in your mind
01:20:21.400 is some 1.00
01:20:22.480 fucking thing 1.00
01:20:23.580 that you think 1.00
01:20:24.160 I should say
01:20:24.980 because it's
01:20:25.860 in your head
01:20:26.540 and you think
01:20:27.080 it's true.
01:20:27.520 that doesn't
01:20:28.820 mean it's
01:20:29.160 in my head.
01:20:30.800 All right?
01:20:31.620 So just 1.00
01:20:32.720 fuck off. 1.00
01:20:35.640 The only 1.00
01:20:36.420 logical
01:20:36.880 conclusion
01:20:37.400 is election
01:20:40.860 cheating.
01:20:43.540 Do you even
01:20:44.380 know what I
01:20:44.740 say about the
01:20:45.240 elections?
01:20:46.180 If our
01:20:46.900 elections are
01:20:48.140 fair, it
01:20:50.140 would be the
01:20:50.660 only institution
01:20:51.900 or system in
01:20:52.760 America that
01:20:53.420 is.
01:20:54.400 What are the
01:20:54.800 odds of that?
01:20:56.220 So I say
01:20:57.020 two things
01:20:57.560 at the same
01:20:58.060 time.
01:20:58.920 One,
01:20:59.520 any specific
01:21:00.360 claim is
01:21:01.160 almost
01:21:01.560 infinitesimally
01:21:02.580 unlikely to
01:21:03.300 be true.
01:21:04.680 Number two,
01:21:05.980 the odds
01:21:06.520 that our
01:21:06.880 elections are
01:21:07.440 not already
01:21:07.980 controlled by
01:21:08.940 our intelligence
01:21:10.420 people are
01:21:11.380 close to zero.
01:21:13.260 I don't think
01:21:13.680 there's really
01:21:14.060 any chance
01:21:14.700 that it's a
01:21:15.200 real election.
01:21:16.320 And I don't
01:21:16.700 think it has
01:21:17.100 been for decades.
01:21:19.440 Are you
01:21:20.020 happy?
01:21:21.840 Whether or
01:21:22.520 not we find
01:21:23.280 proof that
01:21:24.300 the elections
01:21:24.780 are rigged
01:21:26.040 seems
01:21:26.860 somewhat off
01:21:28.240 point because
01:21:29.660 the whole
01:21:30.080 point of
01:21:30.560 having somebody
01:21:31.120 like an
01:21:31.500 intelligence
01:21:31.940 group rig
01:21:32.700 an election
01:21:33.120 is to
01:21:34.200 not get
01:21:34.640 caught.
01:21:36.360 The not
01:21:37.140 getting caught
01:21:37.620 part is pretty
01:21:38.160 important to
01:21:38.820 the professional
01:21:39.580 work.
01:21:41.640 I'm pretty
01:21:41.980 sure they
01:21:42.320 like not
01:21:42.720 getting caught.
01:21:47.300 Punk rock
01:21:48.060 Jesus says,
01:21:48.960 Scott hates
01:21:49.640 people who
01:21:50.720 don't worship
01:21:51.260 him.
01:21:52.520 That sounds
01:21:53.200 a little bit
01:21:53.940 mind
01:21:54.500 reading.
01:21:56.820 Doesn't it?
01:21:59.780 First of
01:22:00.380 all, it's 0.99
01:22:00.680 ridiculous. 0.98
01:22:02.620 And second 1.00
01:22:03.020 of all, if
01:22:04.000 that existed,
01:22:04.840 you could only
01:22:05.400 know it by
01:22:05.900 reading my
01:22:06.420 mind, which
01:22:07.020 you can't
01:22:07.480 do.
01:22:08.380 So why
01:22:09.040 would you
01:22:09.340 read my
01:22:09.760 mind and
01:22:10.240 find something 0.99
01:22:10.800 ridiculous in 0.98
01:22:11.640 there? 0.99
01:22:12.200 Oh, let me
01:22:12.940 do it.
01:22:14.900 You like to 1.00
01:22:15.760 have sex with 1.00
01:22:16.520 kittens. 1.00
01:22:17.460 Well, I can
01:22:17.900 see it as
01:22:18.280 clear as day.
01:22:18.900 So I
01:22:20.940 guess that's
01:22:21.320 proof.
01:22:22.740 You just
01:22:23.180 hate people
01:22:23.760 who try to
01:22:24.460 stop you
01:22:24.880 from having 0.96
01:22:25.340 sex with 0.93
01:22:25.840 kittens, 1.00
01:22:26.340 don't you?
01:22:27.580 I see that
01:22:28.240 in your 0.77
01:22:28.520 brain that
01:22:28.940 I'm reading.
01:22:31.480 I'm reading
01:22:32.220 your comment
01:22:32.680 right now.
01:22:36.060 Yeah,
01:22:36.640 drinking early.
01:22:40.800 Elections
01:22:41.320 were proven
01:22:41.980 stolen.
01:22:43.260 Now,
01:22:44.060 proven means
01:22:45.020 different things
01:22:45.620 to everybody.
01:22:46.960 It wasn't
01:22:47.460 proven to me.
01:22:49.740 So do
01:22:51.400 you believe
01:22:51.680 the pandemic
01:22:52.280 was something
01:22:52.940 that was
01:22:53.500 prepared to
01:22:54.080 control us
01:22:54.600 more, but
01:22:55.760 got it earlier
01:22:56.660 to use?
01:22:57.660 I don't
01:22:58.140 believe the
01:22:58.700 pandemic was
01:22:59.960 intentional.
01:23:02.220 I believe it
01:23:03.120 got out of
01:23:03.540 a lab.
01:23:05.780 Now, there
01:23:06.440 might have
01:23:06.720 been some
01:23:07.100 opportunistic
01:23:08.180 things that
01:23:08.700 happened because
01:23:09.260 of it, but
01:23:09.840 no, it
01:23:10.320 just got
01:23:11.060 out in
01:23:13.800 all likelihood.
01:23:17.260 All right,
01:23:17.880 I'm looking
01:23:18.100 at some of
01:23:18.540 your comments
01:23:19.040 now as
01:23:20.500 I've reached
01:23:20.920 the end
01:23:21.420 of my
01:23:21.800 prepared
01:23:22.340 remarks.
01:23:23.920 All right,
01:23:24.580 thanks for
01:23:25.220 joining
01:23:25.460 everybody on
01:23:26.560 Locals and
01:23:27.880 Rumble and
01:23:29.300 the X
01:23:29.660 platform.
01:23:30.380 I'm going
01:23:30.560 to say
01:23:30.740 goodbye and
01:23:31.540 then I'm
01:23:31.980 going to
01:23:33.040 queue up a
01:23:35.040 separate
01:23:35.640 live stream
01:23:38.160 for the
01:23:38.440 locals people
01:23:39.080 to do a
01:23:40.040 little after
01:23:40.460 show action.
01:23:42.040 Thanks for
01:23:42.440 joining.
01:23:42.800 I'll see you
01:23:43.260 in the morning
01:23:43.920 tomorrow.
01:23:44.880 Less mind
01:23:46.360 reading.