Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 14, 2024


Episode 2444 CWSA 04⧸14⧸24


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per minute

147.20848

Word count

10,241

Sentence count

859

Harmful content

Misogyny

21

sentences flagged

Toxicity

110

sentences flagged

Hate speech

61

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A Chinese study says that 13,000 islands around the world have increased their landmass over two decades, disproving climate change alarms. Is climate change a binary problem, or is it something else entirely? And which is more likely to be true?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization that's called
00:00:06.660 Coffee with Scott Adams, the best time you've ever had. And today we've got a special show for you.
00:00:12.380 What makes it special? Nothing. It's just awesome, like always. And if you'd like to
00:00:18.440 take your experience up to a level that a human brain can barely comprehend, all you need for
00:00:23.920 that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask
00:00:28.440 or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me
00:00:33.560 now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything
00:00:37.300 better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go. So, so good. Well, let's
00:00:54.260 jump right into the news. By the way, if you're not watching Dilbert Reborn, only available
00:01:01.320 by subscription on the X platform or scottadams.locals.com where you get the comic plus a lot more, you
00:01:08.820 would not know that Dave the Engineer is complaining about racism in the office. I'm not going to
00:01:16.220 tell you any more, but it doesn't go the way you expected. I am so happy having my creative
00:01:22.600 freedom to actually do actual real topics that real people are experiencing in the real
00:01:29.040 workplace. Oh my goodness. It's just delightful. Anyway, that's one of the funniest things I've
00:01:35.780 ever written in my life. And if you subscribe, you can see it. And by the way, for the locals
00:01:43.900 people, I took the subscription wall down. So if anybody in locals wants to share that one,
00:01:50.180 that one's available for sharing. Well, here's some news. A Chinese study says that
00:01:56.700 approximately 13,000 islands around the world have increased their landmass over two decades,
00:02:04.040 disproving climate change alarms. Oh, well, that's kind of awkward, isn't it? 13,000 islands
00:02:12.520 got bigger. That's a lot of islands. Now, let me tell you the little bit that I know about the sea
00:02:21.420 level. The little bit I know. The little bit I know is that sea level doesn't change everywhere the
00:02:28.620 same way. Because the landmass itself sometimes goes up and sometimes goes down. And heat, as I
00:02:37.640 understand it, will increase your volume of water. So the warmer places might look a little higher
00:02:45.880 unless they cool off, et cetera. So you've got a lot of moving parts. But apparently climate change
00:02:51.640 has been debunked as one of the causes of rising sea level because CO2 is up, but the sea level is not.
00:03:00.460 Now, you do know that there are two completely different movies on climate change, right?
00:03:08.160 I can sit here all day long and tell you about studies that prove it doesn't exist.
00:03:13.660 But you could change the channel to the other channel where all the studies prove it exists.
00:03:19.960 You know that exists, right? It doesn't matter how many times I tell you there's a study
00:03:25.440 that says it totally doesn't exist. There will be one that says it does coming out at the same time.
00:03:32.740 Which one is true? Well, let's get back to the basics. What percentage of studies in general are true?
00:03:43.080 Just about anything. Any scientific study, what are the odds it's true? 50%. Because they've studied
00:03:51.500 papers, and they know that it's about 50%. Half the time they're wrong.
00:03:59.240 Now, is climate change a binary? Binary meaning it's either happening or it's not happening, right?
00:04:08.100 Because if it's happening, you know, we're not talking about it's too slow or anything.
00:04:11.960 It's either happening a lot and it's really dangerous, or maybe it's not happening.
00:04:17.420 Now, if you've got a binary where it could be happening or not happening, yes or no,
00:04:23.660 and you've got a new paper that has a 50% chance of being right and a 50% chance of being wrong,
00:04:29.140 what have you learned by the new paper? Nothing. Nothing. It's a coin flip.
00:04:37.860 I could have come to you and said, hey, let's flip a coin to see if climate change is real.
00:04:41.960 It would be exactly as useful as this new study about these islands, exactly as useful, meaning not.
00:04:51.600 It has no information value whatsoever. It's a 50-50. It's a coin flip.
00:04:58.520 Now, some of you should be quick to jump on and say, but Scott, let me science-splain you.
00:05:09.160 Is there anybody here who wants to science-splain me? You know, telling me the things that literally
00:05:13.940 everybody already knows as if I'm the only person who doesn't know it? Okay. I'm going to science-splain
00:05:19.520 myself as if I'm my critic. Scott, don't you understand how science works? It's not about one study.
00:05:27.960 It's about, you know, reproducing studies and moving toward the truth slowly over time. Sometimes
00:05:33.620 we make mistakes, but we're moving toward the truth in a directional kind of way, Scott. Don't you
00:05:38.640 understand that these studies don't mean anything individually? You have to look at them collectively
00:05:42.660 with all of your knowledge and things. Science-splainin'. There you go. So, to me, it looks like
00:05:51.600 all the forces of nature are moving in the direction of proving that Trump was right and that climate 1.00
00:05:59.420 change was always bullshit. Just in time for the election. Is it my imagination or have we been hearing 0.99
00:06:10.040 a lot less about climate change than one would expect going into an election? Huh. Why would we hear
00:06:18.540 less about climate change going into an election where the choice of presidents could make the
00:06:25.800 difference between surviving as a species and not surviving? How can we ignore such a gigantic
00:06:33.720 existential risk? Unless the people pushing it are no longer as confident? Because as I told you
00:06:41.380 yesterday, the entire public reason for climate change is dissolved. The public argument is that
00:06:52.320 all the scientists are on the same side. Like, we're not scientists, so how would we know?
00:06:57.780 But if all the scientists, let's say 97%, if they're all on one side, they tell us, well, that must be
00:07:04.580 pretty scientifically accurate with all those people. Of course, the pandemic and, you know, the 51 people
00:07:13.440 on the laptop and all that, and all of our experience lately of our captured experts, et cetera,
00:07:20.680 have largely proved that the number of people on one side means absolutely nothing. Because you can get
00:07:26.800 a whole bunch of people to agree to just about anything, as long as their paycheck depends on it.
00:07:32.620 If you make their paycheck depend on it, they'll tell you anything they want.
00:07:36.160 What do you want to hear? I'll tell you. Just pay me.
00:07:41.160 So I think the climate change argument is just falling apart like crazy.
00:07:46.080 Over in Japan, let's talk about some more fake news. 0.90
00:07:49.480 There's a Japan study that says that the cancer spikes after your third dose of COVID.
00:07:56.800 MRNA vaccines specifically.
00:08:00.100 How many of you believe that is true?
00:08:03.060 Because it has been determined by a Japanese study.
00:08:06.520 Big, big difference in cancer after your third dose.
00:08:10.960 Sound real to you?
00:08:14.440 Well, science. Come on. It must be real.
00:08:18.500 Well, let's check the alternate story.
00:08:21.040 Over on USA Today, they had a fact check from just one month ago.
00:08:26.260 Now, this is before the Japanese study.
00:08:30.700 But one month ago, USA Today said there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer
00:08:38.000 or are associated with a greater risk of developing cancer.
00:08:41.900 Experts say there's no evidence of it.
00:08:45.200 So that means it's true, right?
00:08:49.580 It's true that there's no correlation because there's no evidence of it.
00:08:54.420 There's also no evidence that the 2020 election was rigged
00:08:59.660 because no courts have found it to be true.
00:09:03.360 Yeah. No court found any rigging in 2020.
00:09:08.180 And also, there's no evidence that the shots cause cancer.
00:09:16.780 Do you see the trick?
00:09:19.020 Everybody see the trick?
00:09:20.020 No evidence is really different from saying it doesn't happen.
00:09:26.000 Do you see that?
00:09:27.800 No evidence means we don't know.
00:09:31.120 No evidence means we don't know.
00:09:34.560 Here's what it didn't say.
00:09:35.820 Many controlled, high-quality studies have been performed
00:09:40.980 and have determined there's no signal for extra cancer.
00:09:45.180 Now, that would be a good answer, wouldn't it?
00:09:47.880 Multiple, repeated, gold-standard, randomized, controlled tests.
00:09:55.700 And every time we do the test, we just keep repeating this test.
00:09:58.840 And the last five times, we didn't find a signal at all.
00:10:02.620 And by the way, the tests were all funded by independent people,
00:10:07.540 not pharma companies.
00:10:10.380 Now, that would mean something, wouldn't it?
00:10:12.980 But if you tell me that there's no evidence,
00:10:15.340 do you know what my first inclination is?
00:10:18.280 Is there no evidence because nobody funded an expensive trial to look for it?
00:10:23.600 Whose job would it be to fund the trial to look for the cancer?
00:10:28.840 I don't know.
00:10:30.040 And if somebody did fund a trial and it didn't find any cancer,
00:10:34.620 wouldn't you ask some questions about who funded the trial?
00:10:37.940 Because it sounds like something big pharma might do.
00:10:41.400 Except I think big pharma just doesn't bother doing the long-term studies
00:10:45.080 because they don't have to.
00:10:47.640 There was a time when I believed that the people who made the vaccinations
00:10:53.840 would track people's health over time
00:10:56.260 to make sure that not only was it safe the first year they got it,
00:11:00.400 but that it would remain safe for 10, 20 years.
00:11:04.480 That's what I thought.
00:11:06.160 You know that doesn't happen, right?
00:11:09.100 I'm pretty sure nobody's checking after a certain amount of time.
00:11:12.960 Like if he didn't die in the first year
00:11:14.840 or they didn't see any extra deaths in whatever study they did,
00:11:19.080 they don't really follow up, do they?
00:11:20.860 Does anybody know the answer to that?
00:11:23.460 But I'm pretty sure there's no follow-up.
00:11:25.460 You just assume that there is.
00:11:27.740 Like me, you assume that, well, that's the most natural thing.
00:11:31.460 You would just track a bunch of people who took it,
00:11:34.980 just track them every year,
00:11:36.220 ask them what their situation is compared to the norm,
00:11:38.880 and no, no, I don't believe that happens.
00:11:41.680 So, do we believe the Japanese study found a strong correlation?
00:11:49.260 I don't.
00:11:50.260 I don't believe it at all.
00:11:52.560 Now, I'm not saying it's wrong,
00:11:54.300 and I'm not saying that the shots are completely safe.
00:11:57.580 I wouldn't know.
00:11:58.820 I'm just saying that this is like having no information at all.
00:12:02.940 So the fact check is completely worthless.
00:12:05.560 This was a month ago.
00:12:07.080 Completely worthless because it said no evidence.
00:12:09.220 No evidence is completely different from saying,
00:12:12.560 yeah, we checked it, and it's not there.
00:12:14.980 No evidence means we didn't check.
00:12:17.800 Right?
00:12:19.860 I'm not wrong about that, no way.
00:12:21.480 No evidence means we didn't check.
00:12:24.400 If they had checked,
00:12:25.700 they would have said all the studies say it's not there.
00:12:28.920 But no evidence says we didn't check.
00:12:31.580 I'm pretty sure that's what that means.
00:12:34.960 But, again, you've got a study,
00:12:37.160 and a 50-50 chance it's wrong
00:12:40.240 because it's a study.
00:12:43.980 So, at best, it's a coin flip.
00:12:46.620 Again, the vaccinations were either going to be good for you or not.
00:12:50.800 It's binary.
00:12:52.460 Studies are either right or wrong,
00:12:54.500 and half the time they're wrong.
00:12:56.500 It's just another coin flip.
00:12:58.160 It didn't tell you anything.
00:12:59.320 But how many of you saw that researcher guy, John,
00:13:04.380 somebody who's always the one telling you
00:13:07.220 all the studies are going to, you know, 0.83
00:13:08.500 the COVID's going to kill you?
00:13:10.100 It's always that same guy.
00:13:12.400 Like, it doesn't really get out of his domain too much.
00:13:16.320 So, I don't know.
00:13:18.200 I'm worried about the health risks,
00:13:20.840 but I would say it's short of being proven.
00:13:25.220 It might be.
00:13:25.940 It could be proven someday.
00:13:27.100 Okay.
00:13:29.320 Neuralink brain chip could give users orgasms on demand. 0.92
00:13:35.440 So, the star is reporting that the Neuralink
00:13:38.000 could give orgasms on command.
00:13:42.920 You know, hypnotists can do that too.
00:13:48.380 That's right.
00:13:49.560 Hypnotists can do that.
00:13:50.660 You don't need Neuralink for that.
00:13:53.040 All right.
00:13:53.520 But that's a lot of people are going to buy that Neuralink 0.98
00:13:56.680 if you just sit around giving yourself orgasms. 0.75
00:13:59.320 Anyway, so Cheryl Atkinson has a new video out. 1.00
00:14:06.100 She's interviewing some doctors or doctor. 0.99
00:14:08.820 And we're learning that medical schools are just bullshit. 1.00
00:14:13.040 The medical schools are just terrible. 1.00
00:14:16.140 Apparently, the medical schools teach you lessons
00:14:19.420 that are compatible with what Big Pharma
00:14:21.460 and the junk food industry wants you to hear,
00:14:23.920 wants them to do.
00:14:27.920 Just think about the fact
00:14:29.440 that your doctor is being trained by Big Pharma and Big Food.
00:14:35.960 And Big Pharma and Big Food are the things you're the most worried about.
00:14:39.740 Big food especially.
00:14:40.880 Now, I don't know the connection between junk food and medical school,
00:14:46.160 except maybe there's some kind of funding thing going on.
00:14:50.300 I don't know.
00:14:51.840 But no, your doctor, and I guess doctors confirm this.
00:14:55.940 Doctors have gone through the system,
00:14:57.880 will tell you that they're not getting the right education.
00:15:01.020 There's some kind of money bias built into their education.
00:15:05.340 Great, great.
00:15:09.100 Well, there's a new software
00:15:13.200 that's like similar to the Star Trek holodeck
00:15:16.500 that can create all these virtual worlds
00:15:19.360 that didn't exist before.
00:15:21.340 So you can say, give me a bar scene,
00:15:23.860 or we're outdoors, and it just creates that world.
00:15:27.240 Now, I guess they're using it to train AI.
00:15:29.620 So you use one AI to create worlds,
00:15:31.840 and then a second AI to look at that world
00:15:35.460 and learn from it as if it had been a real world.
00:15:39.760 But here's what I say.
00:15:44.360 We're getting closer and closer
00:15:46.040 to removing all doubt that we are a simulation.
00:15:50.340 You all see that, right?
00:15:52.580 The path toward realizing we're a simulation
00:15:56.020 is so clear at this point.
00:15:58.640 Every time a new thing comes out,
00:16:00.440 it's all in the same direction.
00:16:03.280 Now, here's what this is going to do.
00:16:05.520 Once you realize that AI
00:16:07.440 can create an environment on demand,
00:16:11.480 the next thing you're going to see
00:16:13.440 is that you can take a walk through it.
00:16:16.980 So, for example,
00:16:18.480 you can say, I'm in a house,
00:16:20.820 and then the house will be there perfectly.
00:16:22.840 And then every time you need to go into another room,
00:16:25.540 not until you need it,
00:16:29.220 the room will form before you see it.
00:16:31.500 So when you reach for the doorknob,
00:16:33.540 for the first time,
00:16:35.080 the software will build the room behind the door
00:16:37.200 because it didn't need to do it until then.
00:16:40.080 So it'll do it on demand.
00:16:42.000 Because it's not going to create the universe,
00:16:44.360 in case you go everywhere in the universe.
00:16:46.060 It's going to give you what you need as you need it.
00:16:48.540 And then when you walk outside,
00:16:51.420 maybe for the first time,
00:16:53.580 the outdoors will be created where you can see it.
00:16:56.600 And as you walk through the forest,
00:16:58.340 the forest will be created ahead of it
00:17:00.580 so you keep seeing things.
00:17:03.560 Once you've experienced that,
00:17:06.100 all doubt will be removed
00:17:07.540 about whether you live in a simulation
00:17:09.240 because that's your actual experience.
00:17:12.940 And specifically, it's going to teach you
00:17:15.000 that history is created by the present.
00:17:18.360 It doesn't work the other way.
00:17:20.340 Let me give you that example.
00:17:22.040 You're in the video game.
00:17:23.860 And until you open the door,
00:17:26.100 there's nothing behind it.
00:17:28.120 But as you turn the knob
00:17:29.460 in your virtual reality and open it,
00:17:31.800 the computer gives you the room.
00:17:35.240 Once you open that room,
00:17:37.640 it's not just that it's there at the moment,
00:17:40.080 but its history was created too.
00:17:43.020 In other words,
00:17:44.460 if there's some furniture in the room,
00:17:46.420 there's an implied history.
00:17:48.800 There's something delivered the furniture to the room.
00:17:51.760 So you're going to experience in the virtual realm
00:17:54.800 that the impression of history
00:17:57.440 is being created by things you're seeing in the moment.
00:18:01.140 And then you're going to look at the double slit experiment
00:18:03.160 and Schrodinger's cat,
00:18:05.820 and I get that they work at the quantum level
00:18:08.120 and not at the big person level.
00:18:10.060 But still, it's going to be proof to you
00:18:13.620 that the past is generated by the present.
00:18:18.720 Once you realize that,
00:18:20.480 you know we're in a simulation
00:18:21.600 and everything's heading in that direction.
00:18:23.620 It's going to be obvious.
00:18:24.600 And probably less than a year,
00:18:26.460 it will be generally assumed that we're a simulation.
00:18:30.020 All right.
00:18:33.660 There's a story about a guy
00:18:35.000 who's spending $10,000 per month on AI girlfriends. 0.50
00:18:38.620 And just like dating apps,
00:18:40.860 he has more than one.
00:18:42.300 So he's got one app for this girlfriend,
00:18:44.300 one app for the other one.
00:18:45.600 And apparently,
00:18:47.160 the man who can afford it,
00:18:49.360 I guess it's a man who's got some money
00:18:51.120 and he's single.
00:18:52.900 So he's got some extra money.
00:18:54.580 And he says it's great.
00:18:56.420 It's completely working and satisfying.
00:19:00.680 Now, add that to the holodeck.
00:19:05.380 And I'm pretty sure human reproduction
00:19:09.260 is going to come to a screaming end really quickly.
00:19:13.740 Really quickly.
00:19:15.260 But here's the thing I wonder.
00:19:18.200 In the old, old days,
00:19:20.500 when humans were more like animals,
00:19:22.660 was it true that everybody got to reproduce?
00:19:27.180 Or is that just a modern thing?
00:19:30.140 Where, you know,
00:19:30.960 it doesn't matter how you rank
00:19:32.560 in the hierarchy of your tribe,
00:19:35.660 you all get to reproduce.
00:19:38.500 Now, what happens if in the virtual world,
00:19:42.200 the people who were maybe not so competitive
00:19:44.800 for reproducing,
00:19:46.080 they just take a pass.
00:19:47.700 They say, all right, we won't reproduce.
00:19:49.000 We'll just watch video games
00:19:51.500 and, you know,
00:19:52.860 play out the rest of our simulation.
00:19:56.320 Will that cause everybody to not reproduce?
00:19:59.300 Or will it make the billionaires
00:20:01.680 reproduce like crazy? 1.00
00:20:03.640 You know, the Elon Musk model
00:20:05.040 where he can just have as many babies as he wants.
00:20:08.500 He can just keep doing it
00:20:09.740 because there's no real limit on him.
00:20:12.280 So are we going to go back to a situation
00:20:14.560 where the most capable
00:20:16.240 are having all the babies?
00:20:18.360 And is that bad for us
00:20:21.100 or good for us?
00:20:23.700 I don't know.
00:20:25.060 I mean, if the people
00:20:26.720 who are taken out of the reproduction cycle
00:20:29.520 are completely happy about it,
00:20:32.000 let's say the men,
00:20:32.800 I don't know about the women, 1.00
00:20:34.080 but if the men are happy about it,
00:20:35.580 are they worse off?
00:20:37.560 Because they didn't really have
00:20:38.640 this great marriage option anyway.
00:20:41.760 So they have this great virtual reality option.
00:20:44.480 Maybe it's better.
00:20:45.540 But then the people who can afford it
00:20:47.140 and are really bringing some powerful DNA to the mix
00:20:51.440 because they're smart or strong
00:20:52.960 or handsome or tall
00:20:53.960 or whatever it is,
00:20:55.340 they still will probably be mating like crazy. 0.77
00:20:59.340 So we might end up
00:21:01.200 changing the gene pool of humanity
00:21:04.060 by simply making it impractical
00:21:06.780 for the people
00:21:07.900 on the struggling end of things
00:21:10.140 to reproduce.
00:21:11.340 And they might be just as happy
00:21:12.480 not reproducing.
00:21:14.000 I don't know.
00:21:14.300 Nothing is predictable.
00:21:17.080 But get your AI girlfriend. 0.99
00:21:18.600 Ontario, the wait is over.
00:21:21.520 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.
00:21:24.660 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live,
00:21:26.920 bringing Vegas-style excitement
00:21:28.360 and a world-class gaming experience
00:21:30.380 right to your fingertips.
00:21:32.260 Whether you're a seasoned player
00:21:33.460 or just starting,
00:21:34.600 signing up is fast and simple.
00:21:36.720 And in just a few clicks,
00:21:38.000 you can have access to our exclusive library
00:21:40.000 of the best slots
00:21:41.080 and top-tier table games.
00:21:42.940 Make the most of your downtime
00:21:44.220 with unbeatable promotions
00:21:45.780 and jackpots
00:21:46.580 that can turn any mundane moment
00:21:48.360 into a golden opportunity
00:21:49.880 at Golden Nugget Online Casino.
00:21:52.440 Take a spin on the slots,
00:21:53.780 challenge yourself at the tables,
00:21:55.100 or join a live dealer game
00:21:56.600 to feel the thrill
00:21:57.600 of real-time action,
00:21:58.920 all from the comfort
00:21:59.860 of your own devices.
00:22:01.120 Why settle for less
00:22:02.100 when you can go for the gold
00:22:03.600 at Golden Nugget Online Casino?
00:22:06.420 Gambling problem?
00:22:07.320 Call Connex Ontario
00:22:08.420 1-866-531-2600.
00:22:11.640 19 and over.
00:22:12.540 Physically present in Ontario.
00:22:13.660 Eligibility restrictions apply.
00:22:15.540 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com
00:22:17.240 for details.
00:22:18.020 Please play responsibly.
00:22:20.040 What are the happiest cities?
00:22:21.720 There's another study
00:22:22.480 that showed the rank
00:22:23.920 the happiest cities.
00:22:25.820 And cities from 33 states
00:22:29.380 made the list.
00:22:30.780 That means that the rest
00:22:31.880 of the states had
00:22:32.780 not a single city
00:22:34.920 that was one of the happiest ones.
00:22:37.620 California had the most.
00:22:39.860 California had 16
00:22:40.980 of the happiest cities.
00:22:44.200 It's Florida at 12.
00:22:45.500 What's that tell you?
00:22:48.420 It's the weather.
00:22:50.600 The first decision I made
00:22:52.500 upon graduating college
00:22:54.800 in upstate New York
00:22:56.760 was why would I live
00:22:59.140 in this weather
00:23:00.480 when I could live
00:23:01.620 in good weather?
00:23:02.880 Because at the time,
00:23:04.140 you know,
00:23:04.360 I was a free agent.
00:23:05.380 It was after college.
00:23:06.380 I could go where I wanted.
00:23:07.220 So I went to California
00:23:09.160 because Florida
00:23:11.260 is a little bit muggy.
00:23:13.400 But I guess
00:23:13.840 they're still happy there.
00:23:15.880 And sure enough,
00:23:17.920 Californians got 0.91
00:23:19.300 their legal weed
00:23:20.200 and they got
00:23:20.700 their good weather.
00:23:22.180 And you can screw up
00:23:23.800 just about everything else
00:23:25.480 and that still works.
00:23:28.720 Now, do you think that
00:23:29.820 do you think that sun
00:23:31.740 makes a difference?
00:23:33.340 Who gets the most sun?
00:23:34.680 Hawaii, California, Florida.
00:23:39.460 What are the happiest states?
00:23:42.060 Hawaii, California, Florida.
00:23:46.180 How many data points
00:23:48.980 do you need to see 0.90
00:23:49.900 to get in the freaking sun? 0.96
00:23:53.860 I mean, it couldn't be 0.97
00:23:55.520 more obvious.
00:23:56.780 We went through the pandemic
00:23:57.920 and it's like,
00:23:58.920 get in the sun,
00:23:59.600 vitamin D, vitamin D,
00:24:00.780 vitamin D,
00:24:01.420 vitamin D,
00:24:02.020 vitamin D,
00:24:02.640 get in the sun.
00:24:03.160 And then you do
00:24:04.540 the happiest cities.
00:24:06.320 Sunny, sunny, sunny.
00:24:08.280 Are you getting
00:24:09.100 the message yet?
00:24:11.020 It really is
00:24:12.420 pretty simple.
00:24:15.260 Get some sun.
00:24:16.320 Get outdoors.
00:24:17.500 There's no way
00:24:18.440 that these are coincidences.
00:24:21.060 Get some sun.
00:24:23.020 All right.
00:24:26.940 NPR,
00:24:28.020 oh, Dr. Phil
00:24:28.800 crushed a DEI advocate.
00:24:30.840 So, Dr. Phil
00:24:33.520 had somebody
00:24:34.020 who was arguing 1.00
00:24:34.880 some bad shit crazy woman 1.00
00:24:37.220 who was, 1.00
00:24:38.760 and she looked 0.99
00:24:39.280 bad shit crazy. 0.98
00:24:40.660 I'm just judging from, 1.00
00:24:42.220 she just looked it.
00:24:43.300 I mean,
00:24:43.500 she had 1.00
00:24:43.760 that bad shit crazy eyes 1.00
00:24:46.440 and stuff. 1.00
00:24:47.600 And
00:24:48.040 he got her
00:24:49.640 to say that
00:24:50.420 DEI was about
00:24:51.620 equal outcomes
00:24:52.560 and then he
00:24:53.380 mocked that end
00:24:54.220 of existence
00:24:54.780 because equal outcomes 1.00
00:24:55.840 is what stupid people want. 1.00
00:24:57.700 It's not a real thing. 1.00
00:24:58.820 You can't really have
00:24:59.520 equal outcomes.
00:25:00.940 And as Dr. Phil
00:25:01.960 explained it,
00:25:03.220 well,
00:25:03.500 you got a wall
00:25:04.200 and you got short people
00:25:05.260 who can't see over it
00:25:06.180 and tall people who can.
00:25:07.300 Are you going to fix that?
00:25:08.840 You know,
00:25:09.120 sort of his metaphor
00:25:10.480 for everything else.
00:25:12.420 And
00:25:12.820 here's my take.
00:25:16.060 DEI
00:25:16.460 is not a philosophical
00:25:17.520 difference.
00:25:20.600 I'm going to say this
00:25:21.500 over and over
00:25:21.980 until you all agree.
00:25:23.720 The only philosophical
00:25:24.980 difference between
00:25:25.820 the left and the right
00:25:26.820 is abortion.
00:25:28.840 Everything else 1.00
00:25:29.600 is smart versus stupid 1.00
00:25:30.860 or, you know, 1.00
00:25:32.680 somebody selfishly
00:25:33.760 wants more money.
00:25:35.160 That's it.
00:25:36.820 And DEI 1.00
00:25:37.680 is just stupid. 1.00
00:25:39.460 There's nobody 1.00
00:25:40.200 smart in favor
00:25:41.200 of DEI.
00:25:42.780 Can I say that?
00:25:43.640 There's nobody
00:25:43.980 smart in favor of it.
00:25:45.640 At least,
00:25:46.580 and when I say
00:25:47.280 there's nobody
00:25:47.700 smart in favor of it,
00:25:49.600 I mean that
00:25:50.240 the smarter people
00:25:51.120 who pretend
00:25:52.020 to be in favor of it,
00:25:53.860 let's take your
00:25:54.560 Mark Cubans,
00:25:55.220 for example,
00:25:55.980 smart,
00:25:56.560 unambiguously
00:25:57.200 smart person
00:25:58.000 says in public
00:26:00.080 he's in favor of it.
00:26:01.320 This stuff is not real.
00:26:03.720 All right.
00:26:04.000 He's in favor of it
00:26:05.120 if you define it differently
00:26:06.540 as in not
00:26:07.700 equality of outcomes.
00:26:09.280 So the people
00:26:10.020 who say they're in favor
00:26:10.880 are playing the game
00:26:11.840 where they pretend
00:26:12.540 it's something it isn't
00:26:13.580 or they have to say it
00:26:15.240 because of their company
00:26:16.000 or they're,
00:26:17.300 you know,
00:26:17.460 there's just some pressure
00:26:18.340 they have to say it.
00:26:19.140 There's no smart person
00:26:20.540 who in a room alone
00:26:22.580 says DEI
00:26:23.640 is a good idea. 0.97
00:26:24.460 Not a black person, 1.00
00:26:25.400 not a white person, 0.53
00:26:26.240 not a woman,
00:26:26.780 not a man.
00:26:27.780 There's no adult.
00:26:29.400 None.
00:26:30.760 None.
00:26:31.320 There are zero smart people
00:26:32.480 who think DEI
00:26:33.240 is a good idea
00:26:33.960 if you define it properly
00:26:36.020 as outcomes being equal.
00:26:38.600 None.
00:26:39.000 There's not one.
00:26:39.980 There's not a single
00:26:40.960 smart person 1.00
00:26:41.700 in the whole fucking world 0.99
00:26:42.920 who in a private conversation 1.00
00:26:44.980 with you,
00:26:45.540 if they're not lying
00:26:46.480 and they know
00:26:47.720 that you're not going
00:26:48.240 to out on them,
00:26:49.220 there's not a single person,
00:26:50.580 not one,
00:26:51.740 who's smart
00:26:52.340 and in favor of DEI.
00:26:53.920 Can we just say that out loud?
00:26:56.280 This has nothing to do
00:26:57.640 with philosophy.
00:26:59.500 It has nothing to do
00:27:00.700 with what's good for people. 1.00
00:27:02.800 It's stupid versus smart 1.00
00:27:04.520 and, you know, 1.00
00:27:06.060 there's a layer of grifting
00:27:07.320 on top of it
00:27:08.160 that keeps it all going.
00:27:10.740 You know,
00:27:11.200 and people make money from it
00:27:12.360 so it's sort of
00:27:12.940 self-perpetuating.
00:27:14.240 But to imagine
00:27:15.080 this is a philosophical difference,
00:27:16.980 I'm not going to play
00:27:18.040 that anymore.
00:27:18.580 I can't pretend
00:27:20.300 that's a philosophical difference. 1.00
00:27:22.720 It's fucking stupidity. 1.00
00:27:26.980 Speaking of stupidity, 1.00
00:27:28.760 NPR continues 1.00
00:27:29.680 to humiliate itself
00:27:30.860 and Jonathan Turley
00:27:32.160 is happy to
00:27:33.020 mock them for it
00:27:34.720 in his latest article.
00:27:37.940 Anyway,
00:27:39.120 the new,
00:27:39.720 the NPR,
00:27:40.560 not new,
00:27:41.040 but the NPR CEO,
00:27:42.600 Catherine Marr.
00:27:44.460 Oh,
00:27:45.100 okay.
00:27:45.420 I'd love to see
00:27:47.420 a picture of her.
00:27:49.400 I just have a theory
00:27:50.560 about what her eyes
00:27:51.720 probably look like,
00:27:52.760 but I'm just guessing here.
00:27:54.200 I haven't seen
00:27:54.600 a picture of her.
00:27:56.360 Maybe saucerized?
00:27:57.780 Maybe.
00:27:58.280 I don't know.
00:27:59.820 But
00:28:00.040 she,
00:28:02.560 of course,
00:28:03.220 she's responding
00:28:03.840 to the big
00:28:05.180 dust-up
00:28:06.460 because one of her
00:28:07.340 editors said
00:28:08.400 that the place
00:28:09.000 was just a 0.72
00:28:09.820 liberal hellhole.
00:28:11.720 He didn't say hellhole,
00:28:13.040 but he said
00:28:13.380 there's basically,
00:28:14.560 not basically,
00:28:15.140 there are zero
00:28:15.960 Republicans working
00:28:17.000 as editors there
00:28:17.900 and of,
00:28:18.820 I don't know,
00:28:19.140 80 some.
00:28:20.540 And,
00:28:20.860 and NPR
00:28:23.740 is not even
00:28:24.260 really pretending
00:28:25.100 to be any kind
00:28:26.900 of an independent
00:28:27.600 news outlet.
00:28:28.320 It's just a
00:28:29.060 lefty organ.
00:28:30.420 So once,
00:28:31.480 once somebody
00:28:32.320 who really did
00:28:33.140 know what's happening,
00:28:34.440 you know,
00:28:34.600 not somebody guessing,
00:28:35.760 somebody who was
00:28:36.280 in the middle
00:28:36.740 of the belly
00:28:37.360 of the beast,
00:28:38.280 called them out
00:28:39.080 for what they really are,
00:28:40.720 what did the CEO do?
00:28:42.380 Did the CEO say,
00:28:43.580 those are some
00:28:44.120 good criticisms?
00:28:45.900 We'd better
00:28:46.580 re-examine
00:28:47.320 how we do business
00:28:48.920 and you're right.
00:28:50.240 We need some
00:28:51.220 diversity of thought
00:28:52.560 because,
00:28:54.160 oh,
00:28:54.440 I guess
00:28:54.700 I got it right.
00:28:56.020 Somebody just
00:28:56.620 put her picture there.
00:28:57.740 Oh,
00:28:58.240 God.
00:29:04.980 Oh,
00:29:05.540 God.
00:29:06.740 Yeah.
00:29:07.980 Okay.
00:29:09.460 Anyway.
00:29:09.900 And she said that
00:29:14.780 so what she did
00:29:17.220 instead of saying
00:29:18.020 that NPR
00:29:18.560 is broken
00:29:19.360 and biased
00:29:20.280 and they need
00:29:20.820 to fix it
00:29:21.400 to get credibility
00:29:22.280 with their audience,
00:29:23.840 she said that
00:29:24.760 the guy who
00:29:25.400 outed them
00:29:25.980 is profoundly
00:29:26.640 disrespectful,
00:29:27.680 hurtful,
00:29:28.020 and demeaning.
00:29:29.560 And calling out
00:29:30.580 his colleagues
00:29:31.120 like that
00:29:31.580 was just
00:29:32.400 not right.
00:29:35.080 That's right.
00:29:35.760 she attacked 0.99
00:29:36.860 the whistleblower.
00:29:40.420 She attacked 0.99
00:29:41.200 the whistleblower.
00:29:42.700 I don't know
00:29:43.420 if there's any way
00:29:44.220 you could make
00:29:44.700 that any worse.
00:29:46.220 Yeah. 1.00
00:29:46.620 Let's shit 1.00
00:29:47.100 on the white guy. 1.00
00:29:49.080 That's the way
00:29:50.260 to play this.
00:29:52.220 Now,
00:29:53.300 may I say again
00:29:54.740 that whatever
00:29:56.600 was happening
00:29:57.180 at NPR,
00:29:58.640 if you say
00:29:59.300 that NPR
00:29:59.880 had a
00:30:00.540 philosophical
00:30:02.020 argument
00:30:02.720 and that's
00:30:03.840 why they act
00:30:04.760 the way they are,
00:30:05.920 it's based
00:30:06.380 on the philosophy.
00:30:08.740 It's not based
00:30:09.500 on the philosophy.
00:30:10.720 These are 0.99
00:30:11.240 batshit crazy people. 1.00
00:30:13.540 They're batshit crazy. 1.00
00:30:15.260 They're clearly 0.99
00:30:15.920 suffering from TDS
00:30:17.240 because remember
00:30:18.080 it all happened
00:30:18.660 from the Trump
00:30:19.700 time on
00:30:20.740 it got worse.
00:30:22.320 No,
00:30:22.700 this is
00:30:23.120 mental health
00:30:24.920 and to imagine
00:30:26.680 this is anything
00:30:27.320 but bad.
00:30:29.260 Oh my God.
00:30:31.780 The locals people,
00:30:33.000 not everybody
00:30:33.760 can do this
00:30:34.320 but the locals people
00:30:35.340 can include
00:30:36.100 images.
00:30:37.840 They're showing me
00:30:38.720 images of the
00:30:39.560 NPR CEO.
00:30:42.880 It's exactly
00:30:43.800 what you think
00:30:44.420 it is.
00:30:47.120 That's perfect.
00:30:49.700 All right,
00:30:50.660 so I saw a post
00:30:51.920 by Tom Elliott
00:30:52.680 on the X platform
00:30:53.780 and it was
00:30:55.040 an MSNBC clip
00:30:56.500 of somebody
00:30:57.580 doing something.
00:30:59.520 Now,
00:31:00.460 I'm not even
00:31:01.720 going to tell you
00:31:02.120 what it was about
00:31:02.840 because it's not
00:31:03.680 relevant.
00:31:04.700 Here's the funny
00:31:05.520 story.
00:31:06.800 If you're on
00:31:07.580 the X platform
00:31:08.340 and somebody
00:31:10.220 reposts a clip
00:31:11.580 from MSNBC
00:31:12.640 and they don't
00:31:14.440 put a comment
00:31:15.000 on it,
00:31:15.580 they don't put
00:31:16.280 their own comment,
00:31:17.220 it's just
00:31:17.560 take a look
00:31:18.320 at this.
00:31:20.500 It's always
00:31:21.240 for humor.
00:31:22.500 Have you noticed
00:31:23.260 that?
00:31:24.420 That the right
00:31:25.280 actually uses
00:31:26.280 MSNBC,
00:31:27.340 no joke,
00:31:28.020 this is not
00:31:28.500 hyperbole,
00:31:29.740 we use it
00:31:30.320 like Saturday
00:31:30.860 Night Live
00:31:31.580 with no comments
00:31:33.500 needed.
00:31:34.620 So I was looking
00:31:35.300 at one today
00:31:35.900 and, you know,
00:31:37.040 as soon as I saw
00:31:37.900 it was reposted,
00:31:39.240 I knew it was
00:31:39.880 for comedy.
00:31:41.580 I knew it had
00:31:42.360 nothing to do
00:31:42.880 with their philosophy
00:31:43.700 or their difference
00:31:44.580 of opinion.
00:31:45.440 In fact,
00:31:45.860 I don't even
00:31:46.380 remember what
00:31:46.960 it was about.
00:31:47.900 I just remember
00:31:48.440 it was funny
00:31:49.020 because I got
00:31:50.360 to see some
00:31:50.920 batshit crazy 0.97
00:31:51.620 people and 0.99
00:31:53.340 talking.
00:31:54.320 And if you see 0.76
00:31:54.880 batshit crazy 0.61
00:31:55.680 people, 0.99
00:31:56.940 and I've said
00:31:57.340 this before,
00:31:57.960 but once you
00:31:58.380 see it,
00:31:58.700 it's hilarious.
00:31:59.760 If you're only
00:32:00.760 watching somebody
00:32:01.520 crazy,
00:32:02.160 it's disturbing.
00:32:03.680 That's not funny.
00:32:05.140 Would you agree?
00:32:06.480 If you see
00:32:07.020 somebody who's
00:32:07.540 in mental distress,
00:32:09.340 that's not funny.
00:32:11.680 There's no way
00:32:12.280 you can make
00:32:12.660 that funny.
00:32:13.140 The only way
00:32:14.600 it can be funny
00:32:15.360 is when it's
00:32:16.960 combined with
00:32:17.860 smugness.
00:32:19.760 And that's
00:32:20.480 what MSNBC 0.66
00:32:21.300 does.
00:32:22.120 They combine
00:32:22.960 it with the
00:32:23.420 smugness that
00:32:24.320 they're right.
00:32:25.620 And when you
00:32:26.100 add the mental
00:32:26.780 illness to the 0.88
00:32:27.580 smugness,
00:32:28.680 I can't stop
00:32:30.100 watching it.
00:32:31.700 Honestly,
00:32:32.960 I just want to
00:32:33.980 watch Lawrence
00:32:35.100 O'Donnell and
00:32:36.000 Rachel Maddow
00:32:37.220 with their
00:32:37.740 smug smile.
00:32:39.440 Well,
00:32:40.920 let me see if
00:32:41.920 I can do an
00:32:42.360 impression.
00:32:43.140 of being 0.95
00:32:44.140 crazy and 0.98
00:32:45.260 smug at the 0.99
00:32:45.880 same time.
00:32:47.720 Well,
00:32:49.260 I don't think
00:32:51.320 a lot of
00:32:51.640 Republicans
00:32:52.080 understand that
00:32:54.240 oil doesn't
00:32:55.000 even need to
00:32:55.400 be drilled
00:32:55.740 for.
00:32:56.080 It's free.
00:32:57.400 It's all over
00:32:58.100 the place.
00:32:58.580 It's on the
00:32:58.920 ground.
00:33:00.100 I've got oil
00:33:00.660 in my pocket.
00:33:03.400 And I
00:33:05.220 guess if you're
00:33:05.780 a Republican,
00:33:06.860 you think you
00:33:07.400 have to drill
00:33:08.980 holes in the
00:33:09.460 ground for it.
00:33:11.360 Am I right,
00:33:12.140 people?
00:33:13.140 They're out
00:33:13.580 there like
00:33:14.000 drilling holes
00:33:15.060 in the
00:33:15.300 ground.
00:33:17.760 Oh,
00:33:18.320 smugly.
00:33:19.680 I'm so
00:33:20.340 smug.
00:33:22.720 Oil's free.
00:33:24.140 Oil's free,
00:33:24.840 people.
00:33:25.960 It's laying
00:33:26.560 all over the
00:33:27.000 place.
00:33:27.700 In fact,
00:33:28.200 if you go
00:33:28.600 out in your
00:33:28.840 car,
00:33:29.820 you can go
00:33:30.500 out in your
00:33:30.740 car and it's
00:33:31.120 full of oil.
00:33:33.040 Does anybody
00:33:33.680 say that?
00:33:34.220 No.
00:33:34.820 No.
00:33:35.120 Does Trump
00:33:35.540 ever mention
00:33:36.140 that there's
00:33:37.440 oil right
00:33:37.860 there in
00:33:38.140 your car?
00:33:39.460 No.
00:33:39.880 He needs
00:33:40.180 to start
00:33:40.580 a war to
00:33:42.380 go look for
00:33:42.860 some oil
00:33:43.300 like a
00:33:43.680 dictator.
00:33:46.880 That's
00:33:47.240 how a
00:33:47.460 dictator
00:33:47.700 does.
00:33:49.620 They start
00:33:50.280 a war to
00:33:51.460 look for
00:33:51.820 oil, but
00:33:52.220 they don't
00:33:52.500 need to
00:33:52.820 because your
00:33:53.220 car has
00:33:53.680 oil right
00:33:54.200 in it.
00:33:55.080 If you
00:33:55.220 don't believe
00:33:55.560 me, open
00:33:56.600 the hood.
00:33:57.580 There's a
00:33:57.940 little round
00:33:58.280 thing.
00:33:58.580 You can
00:33:58.840 take that
00:33:59.320 out and
00:34:00.080 there's a
00:34:00.460 stick in
00:34:00.740 it.
00:34:01.520 It's called
00:34:02.060 the dip
00:34:02.380 stick, just
00:34:03.500 like President 0.66
00:34:04.080 Trump.
00:34:04.580 Am I
00:34:04.780 right?
00:34:07.080 Dipstick.
00:34:08.320 Well, isn't
00:34:08.860 that a
00:34:09.140 coincidence?
00:34:11.460 Yeah.
00:34:12.260 I think
00:34:12.900 that's enough
00:34:13.440 of Smug
00:34:14.360 Scott and
00:34:14.920 MSNBC.
00:34:18.420 Well,
00:34:18.980 Julian
00:34:19.280 Assange, of
00:34:19.860 course we're
00:34:20.280 going to
00:34:20.460 talk about
00:34:20.980 Iran and
00:34:21.660 Israel.
00:34:22.520 Of course
00:34:22.920 we are.
00:34:24.300 Of course
00:34:24.780 we are.
00:34:25.640 But it's
00:34:26.020 the most
00:34:26.280 boring war
00:34:26.940 ever so
00:34:27.460 far, so
00:34:28.060 it didn't
00:34:28.800 even get
00:34:29.200 in the
00:34:29.420 top ten
00:34:29.800 stories
00:34:30.200 today.
00:34:31.480 Israel,
00:34:32.220 Iran, you're 1.00
00:34:32.980 going to
00:34:33.240 need something
00:34:34.140 a little
00:34:36.100 more, you
00:34:36.960 know, a
00:34:38.480 little more
00:34:38.780 sizzle.
00:34:41.680 Oh, we
00:34:42.360 had a war
00:34:42.820 today, nobody
00:34:43.820 was killed.
00:34:46.520 Really?
00:34:48.200 And that's
00:34:48.960 supposed to
00:34:49.400 impress me?
00:34:50.840 You had a
00:34:51.260 war with
00:34:51.640 nobody killed?
00:34:52.120 We'll get
00:34:52.480 to it.
00:34:53.100 We'll get
00:34:53.600 to it.
00:34:53.920 It's just a
00:34:54.440 boring war.
00:34:55.920 It's going
00:34:56.500 to be, it's
00:34:57.420 coming up.
00:35:00.000 Julian
00:35:00.420 Assange warned
00:35:01.200 us a while
00:35:01.700 ago that the
00:35:02.600 goal of
00:35:03.680 war is
00:35:04.220 never to
00:35:04.720 end the
00:35:05.080 war, and
00:35:06.380 it's never
00:35:06.720 to win.
00:35:07.240 It's to
00:35:07.780 drain money
00:35:08.780 out of the
00:35:09.300 pockets of
00:35:09.880 the citizens
00:35:10.360 and put it
00:35:11.580 in the
00:35:11.860 pockets of
00:35:12.460 the powerful
00:35:13.040 people.
00:35:13.980 Is Julian
00:35:14.760 Assange wrong
00:35:15.580 that the
00:35:16.720 real purpose
00:35:17.420 of war is
00:35:18.040 to transfer
00:35:18.620 your money
00:35:19.180 to the rich
00:35:20.020 people who
00:35:20.480 already have
00:35:20.920 a lot?
00:35:22.540 He's not
00:35:23.280 wrong.
00:35:24.020 It's not the
00:35:24.660 only thing
00:35:25.120 happening.
00:35:26.820 But he's
00:35:27.420 not wrong,
00:35:28.740 meaning that it
00:35:29.660 does in
00:35:30.120 fact do
00:35:30.560 that, and
00:35:31.660 those powerful
00:35:32.280 people have
00:35:32.920 more control
00:35:33.640 over whether
00:35:34.140 we go to
00:35:34.580 war than
00:35:35.100 you do.
00:35:36.660 So it's
00:35:37.560 sort of
00:35:37.840 right.
00:35:38.720 It's not
00:35:39.100 the whole
00:35:39.400 story.
00:35:41.000 What are
00:35:41.400 you showing
00:35:41.740 me here?
00:35:44.720 Let me
00:35:45.080 look at
00:35:45.540 this.
00:35:48.600 The bright
00:35:49.340 side is
00:35:49.860 world wars
00:35:50.580 are the
00:35:50.840 only ones
00:35:51.280 we win.
00:35:52.000 Right.
00:35:53.000 Exactly.
00:35:53.480 All right.
00:35:58.320 We'll get
00:35:59.000 to that.
00:36:01.420 But did
00:36:02.180 you notice
00:36:02.620 that this
00:36:03.400 time Israel
00:36:04.920 put a price
00:36:05.600 tag on
00:36:06.560 their latest
00:36:07.000 action?
00:36:08.460 So Iran, 0.95
00:36:09.260 you know,
00:36:09.780 we'll talk
00:36:10.540 more, but
00:36:11.000 they sent
00:36:11.400 some missiles
00:36:11.900 and some
00:36:12.420 drones, and
00:36:13.180 Israel defeats
00:36:14.580 almost all of
00:36:15.260 them with
00:36:16.000 their help,
00:36:16.920 and then
00:36:18.100 they put a
00:36:18.480 price tag
00:36:18.920 on it.
00:36:19.680 They said,
00:36:20.220 well, it
00:36:20.720 costs a
00:36:21.160 little over
00:36:21.540 $1 billion
00:36:22.160 to defend.
00:36:24.100 Have you
00:36:24.620 ever seen
00:36:24.980 anybody put
00:36:26.200 a price tag
00:36:26.900 on a
00:36:27.280 single battle?
00:36:30.480 Has that
00:36:31.060 ever happened
00:36:31.480 before?
00:36:32.960 Do you know
00:36:33.560 why they put
00:36:33.940 a price tag
00:36:34.500 on it?
00:36:38.280 Because
00:36:38.720 they're asking
00:36:39.280 for money
00:36:39.900 from the
00:36:40.460 United States.
00:36:41.460 So Israel 0.99
00:36:42.020 put a price
00:36:42.640 tag on
00:36:43.100 their action.
00:36:44.500 Well, here's
00:36:44.900 another billion
00:36:45.440 dollars.
00:36:45.920 That's why
00:36:46.220 we're asking
00:36:46.620 for money.
00:36:48.040 Now, the
00:36:48.820 fact that
00:36:49.240 they had
00:36:49.660 the guts
00:36:50.640 to put a
00:36:51.820 price tag
00:36:52.360 on that,
00:36:53.480 is number
00:36:54.940 one, really
00:36:55.780 good persuasion.
00:36:58.400 It's very
00:36:59.060 good persuasion
00:36:59.840 because it
00:37:01.320 fits with
00:37:01.820 their
00:37:02.000 trying to
00:37:02.520 get funding,
00:37:03.160 et cetera.
00:37:04.320 But it's
00:37:05.920 so on the
00:37:06.560 nose.
00:37:07.860 The trouble
00:37:08.400 is that when
00:37:09.000 you've got
00:37:09.380 this Assange
00:37:10.080 quote sitting
00:37:10.860 out there,
00:37:11.820 that it's
00:37:12.040 really all
00:37:12.520 about transferring
00:37:13.380 money to rich
00:37:14.160 people, and
00:37:15.180 then Israel
00:37:15.660 gives you a
00:37:16.180 price tag for
00:37:16.900 the battle,
00:37:17.320 people, and
00:37:19.180 it's over
00:37:19.560 a billion
00:37:19.920 dollars, that
00:37:21.920 does really
00:37:22.520 play to
00:37:23.020 Assange's
00:37:23.820 view that
00:37:24.700 maybe these
00:37:26.220 wars are a
00:37:26.800 little more
00:37:27.200 optional than
00:37:28.100 they're
00:37:28.500 presented to
00:37:29.100 us.
00:37:30.080 Now, I'm
00:37:31.460 no fool, so
00:37:32.420 I know the 0.98
00:37:32.880 Middle East is
00:37:33.400 complicated, and
00:37:34.220 it's not all
00:37:34.780 about the
00:37:35.200 money, but
00:37:36.360 the money is
00:37:36.940 always going to
00:37:37.440 be a big
00:37:37.860 part of it.
00:37:39.280 It's not
00:37:40.040 nothing.
00:37:41.040 I don't think
00:37:41.680 it's most of
00:37:42.280 it, and I
00:37:42.700 don't think it's
00:37:43.120 the main reason
00:37:43.780 anybody's doing
00:37:44.340 anything.
00:37:44.680 But it's
00:37:46.040 a lot.
00:37:49.340 All right,
00:37:49.580 Bill Gates
00:37:50.040 and Jamie
00:37:51.940 Diamond both
00:37:53.300 think that
00:37:53.840 AI could lead
00:37:54.640 to shorter
00:37:55.080 work weeks.
00:37:56.100 I say those
00:37:57.020 are terrible
00:37:57.780 predictions because
00:38:00.260 billionaires don't
00:38:01.960 work less when
00:38:02.680 they become
00:38:03.100 billionaires.
00:38:05.000 The fact that
00:38:05.800 you're able to
00:38:06.700 work less doesn't
00:38:07.860 seem to be
00:38:08.480 related to how
00:38:09.160 much people
00:38:09.580 work.
00:38:10.920 Am I right?
00:38:11.780 I mean, Elon
00:38:12.280 Musk, he's not
00:38:13.000 taking a day
00:38:13.580 off.
00:38:13.860 Bill Gates
00:38:14.880 himself, he
00:38:15.620 just changed
00:38:16.120 what he did.
00:38:17.080 He changed
00:38:17.500 it to charity,
00:38:20.460 to giving it
00:38:20.920 away, but
00:38:21.360 he's still
00:38:22.380 working.
00:38:23.680 And Jamie
00:38:24.800 Diamond, does
00:38:25.640 Jamie Diamond
00:38:26.280 need to work?
00:38:27.900 How much
00:38:28.520 money does
00:38:28.960 Jamie Diamond
00:38:29.560 have?
00:38:29.960 He doesn't
00:38:30.260 need to work,
00:38:31.500 but he still
00:38:31.980 works.
00:38:32.860 So the very
00:38:33.660 people who are
00:38:34.260 saying that we're
00:38:34.860 going to work
00:38:35.340 less when we
00:38:37.120 don't need to
00:38:37.680 work are the
00:38:39.040 ones who are
00:38:39.580 working even
00:38:40.460 though they don't
00:38:40.960 need to work.
00:38:41.560 work, I feel
00:38:42.620 like they're
00:38:43.380 disproving their
00:38:44.140 own argument.
00:38:46.960 I don't need
00:38:47.720 to work, but
00:38:49.940 you see me here
00:38:50.580 literally seven
00:38:51.340 days a week.
00:38:52.440 I work seven
00:38:53.260 days a week, but
00:38:54.780 I don't need to.
00:38:56.740 It's just who I
00:38:57.620 am.
00:38:58.400 I wouldn't know
00:38:59.040 how to not
00:38:59.500 work.
00:39:00.440 So here's what I
00:39:01.180 think.
00:39:01.460 I think the
00:39:01.960 aggressive people
00:39:02.780 who need to
00:39:03.280 work for whatever
00:39:03.980 reason will use
00:39:05.900 AI to work their
00:39:07.180 usual long hours.
00:39:08.580 They'll just get
00:39:09.200 more done because
00:39:10.540 they have more
00:39:10.940 tools.
00:39:12.080 So no, it's
00:39:12.700 not going to, it
00:39:13.940 might actually take
00:39:14.920 the lazy people
00:39:15.700 down to three
00:39:16.320 days a week.
00:39:17.000 So I think
00:39:17.340 that's true.
00:39:18.380 But it will
00:39:20.980 just be an
00:39:21.440 acceleration of a
00:39:22.580 current trend,
00:39:23.400 which is the
00:39:23.880 aggressive people
00:39:24.540 keep working and
00:39:25.500 the lazy people
00:39:26.300 try to stop.
00:39:29.600 Facebook says
00:39:30.560 it's going to
00:39:31.760 spend $20
00:39:32.360 billion and
00:39:33.240 has 40,000
00:39:34.160 people working
00:39:34.880 on safeguarding
00:39:36.400 elections worldwide.
00:39:37.400 Okay, that
00:39:40.240 doesn't sound too
00:39:41.080 suspicious.
00:39:42.660 Let me pull some
00:39:43.800 things together for
00:39:44.680 you.
00:39:45.240 In our world, it's
00:39:46.560 almost impossible to
00:39:47.720 get as big as
00:39:48.420 Facebook or any
00:39:49.820 other big company
00:39:50.620 unless the
00:39:52.240 government is on
00:39:52.960 your side.
00:39:55.680 Right?
00:39:56.720 Because at some
00:39:57.640 point, you need to
00:39:58.840 be able to control
00:39:59.760 other countries and
00:40:01.920 the laws need to be
00:40:02.920 on your side and you
00:40:04.000 need to not get
00:40:04.700 sued for stuff.
00:40:05.640 And at some
00:40:06.800 point, you just
00:40:07.620 need to have the
00:40:08.640 government on your
00:40:09.300 side and they
00:40:09.960 know that.
00:40:11.380 So the government
00:40:11.960 and their spooks can
00:40:14.080 pretty much control
00:40:14.920 any large company
00:40:16.040 because any large
00:40:17.760 company needs the
00:40:18.560 government to be on
00:40:19.260 their side.
00:40:19.960 There's just too
00:40:20.400 many obstacles that
00:40:21.320 only a government
00:40:22.080 can remove.
00:40:23.800 So here we have
00:40:25.040 Zuckerberg who has
00:40:28.260 a social media
00:40:29.000 company that was
00:40:29.860 built for the
00:40:30.540 purpose of guys
00:40:31.460 trying to get laid
00:40:32.380 with other college
00:40:33.500 people.
00:40:34.560 people and
00:40:35.880 turned into this
00:40:36.580 behemoth and
00:40:38.000 now he wants to
00:40:38.760 spend 20 billion
00:40:39.700 and 40,000 people
00:40:41.100 to make sure that
00:40:42.380 elections in other
00:40:43.780 countries, this
00:40:44.600 isn't just about
00:40:45.280 America, people.
00:40:46.360 This is global.
00:40:49.420 And that Facebook
00:40:50.140 will have the
00:40:50.780 largest fact-checking
00:40:52.020 network with
00:40:53.240 partners in South
00:40:54.220 Africa, blah, blah, 0.99
00:40:56.320 blah.
00:40:56.420 And it seems to
00:41:00.960 me that what is
00:41:03.600 happening is that
00:41:04.520 the CIA has told
00:41:07.120 Facebook, you guys
00:41:08.780 couldn't possibly be
00:41:09.860 in business without
00:41:10.620 us and so you're
00:41:12.400 going to now help
00:41:13.040 us control the
00:41:13.880 governments and all
00:41:14.700 these other places.
00:41:15.960 If you can control
00:41:17.280 the media, meaning
00:41:19.240 the fact-checking
00:41:20.280 and the social media
00:41:21.740 online and the
00:41:22.700 news, if you can
00:41:23.940 control those things,
00:41:24.880 you don't need to
00:41:25.480 control the voting
00:41:26.800 machines.
00:41:28.140 You don't need to
00:41:29.180 have any miscounting
00:41:31.420 or shenanigans at
00:41:33.120 the vote if you've
00:41:34.480 controlled all of the
00:41:35.500 information up until
00:41:36.700 election day.
00:41:38.100 So here, right in
00:41:39.080 front of us, we see
00:41:40.340 this huge entity, which
00:41:41.780 almost certainly is
00:41:42.740 being driven by our
00:41:43.900 intelligence people,
00:41:45.480 creating a massive
00:41:46.420 structure to brainwash
00:41:48.640 people in our country
00:41:49.700 and other countries so
00:41:51.040 that the elections are
00:41:52.080 the unimportant part
00:41:53.180 of the process.
00:41:55.700 So the election, the
00:41:57.280 actual voting, is the
00:41:58.680 unimportant part of
00:41:59.600 the process.
00:42:00.400 The important part is
00:42:01.620 what people think,
00:42:03.620 because then the vote
00:42:04.420 just comes from that.
00:42:06.220 So changing how people
00:42:07.180 think is exactly what
00:42:09.680 Facebook is telling you
00:42:11.020 they're doing.
00:42:11.860 They're telling you
00:42:12.780 they're in the business
00:42:13.520 of mind control,
00:42:14.960 except they're phrasing
00:42:16.960 it as giving people
00:42:18.400 accurate information.
00:42:19.300 Do you think that's
00:42:20.980 the only goal, is to
00:42:22.300 give people accurate
00:42:23.140 information?
00:42:24.520 Well, I'm sure that
00:42:25.460 people working on this
00:42:26.420 think of it that way.
00:42:28.740 But no, it's to give
00:42:30.660 them accurate information
00:42:31.880 until they believe what
00:42:33.680 you're telling them, and
00:42:34.520 then you can tell them
00:42:35.300 anything, because you've
00:42:36.780 trained them that it's
00:42:37.500 accurate information.
00:42:39.060 As soon as people
00:42:39.800 believe it's accurate
00:42:40.660 information, you own
00:42:41.820 them.
00:42:43.180 Take Walter Cronkite.
00:42:45.080 When I grew up, and
00:42:47.220 even today, people say,
00:42:49.160 you know, Walter
00:42:49.760 Cronkite, he was the 0.82
00:42:51.400 real news.
00:42:53.180 And, you know, you got
00:42:54.520 the straight news, no
00:42:56.000 bias, that Walter
00:42:57.640 Cronkite, I wish we
00:42:59.880 could go back to those
00:43:00.680 times, because he
00:43:01.540 played it right down
00:43:02.520 the middle.
00:43:03.700 Now, look at Walter
00:43:04.880 Cronkite with the
00:43:06.580 benefit of the goggles
00:43:07.860 which you've learned to
00:43:08.980 wear in our modern
00:43:10.020 times.
00:43:11.300 Do you think there's
00:43:12.940 any chance at all that
00:43:14.180 Walter Cronkite was not
00:43:15.380 owned by our
00:43:16.180 intelligence people?
00:43:17.380 Does anybody think
00:43:19.640 that was honest and
00:43:20.800 unbalanced news?
00:43:22.660 Of course it wasn't.
00:43:24.860 Of course not.
00:43:26.560 It's never been.
00:43:28.340 Yeah.
00:43:30.340 Now, it does seem to
00:43:31.480 me that Walter Cronkite
00:43:33.420 was probably allowed to
00:43:34.640 tell the news just the
00:43:35.640 way he wanted to, 98%
00:43:37.820 of the time.
00:43:39.100 So if you're watching,
00:43:40.360 you know, some human
00:43:41.220 interest story or somebody
00:43:42.380 got murdered, it's
00:43:43.660 probably exactly what
00:43:44.640 happened.
00:43:44.960 It's only when
00:43:46.680 something matters, as
00:43:48.480 in what's the point of
00:43:49.600 this war or are we
00:43:51.300 winning the war?
00:43:52.760 Are we getting to
00:43:54.000 space?
00:43:54.400 Are we the greatest
00:43:55.080 country?
00:43:55.920 The things that the
00:43:57.060 intelligence people would
00:43:58.000 care about, there's no
00:43:59.680 way in the world he's
00:44:00.540 just winging in on those
00:44:01.620 things.
00:44:02.260 I think they're just
00:44:03.360 telling him what to
00:44:05.340 say and always have.
00:44:09.240 That's my view of the
00:44:10.200 world.
00:44:10.380 So, yes, when Facebook
00:44:12.840 says they're spending
00:44:13.580 $20 billion and have
00:44:14.820 40,000 people dedicated
00:44:16.800 to tell you what the
00:44:17.820 facts are, that means
00:44:20.200 that elections don't
00:44:21.040 matter anymore.
00:44:22.580 That's what it means.
00:44:24.020 Because if they can tell
00:44:25.300 you what the facts are,
00:44:26.620 they can tell you who's
00:44:27.820 going to win the next
00:44:28.560 election.
00:44:30.100 It's the same story.
00:44:32.460 All right.
00:44:34.260 Fog of war over in
00:44:35.500 Israel.
00:44:35.780 As you know, Israel
00:44:38.400 had, I don't know, a
00:44:40.560 few weeks ago, attacked
00:44:41.680 an Iranian asset in
00:44:45.700 another country, an 0.73
00:44:46.560 embassy or a consulate or
00:44:47.840 something, killed some
00:44:48.920 people.
00:44:49.660 So Iran said it had to
00:44:50.820 retaliate, and it did,
00:44:52.780 to ascend around, I
00:44:53.900 don't know, two to
00:44:54.480 three hundred projectiles.
00:44:56.700 So a bunch of drones and
00:44:58.060 a bunch of intercontinental
00:44:59.380 missiles.
00:45:00.720 Allegedly, America and UK
00:45:03.580 and Israel and some
00:45:05.260 other friends, knocked
00:45:06.880 down just about every
00:45:08.140 one of those drones and
00:45:09.580 missiles, only maybe a
00:45:10.860 couple got through,
00:45:12.220 causing minor damage,
00:45:13.920 nothing major.
00:45:16.420 Now, have you ever heard
00:45:18.500 the phrase, a theater of
00:45:21.600 war?
00:45:22.940 You used to hear a lot
00:45:23.900 about World War II.
00:45:26.260 It was like the Pacific
00:45:27.260 theater.
00:45:28.840 It was like a theater of
00:45:30.180 war.
00:45:30.460 Did you ever think that
00:45:33.400 was a weird kind of way
00:45:35.440 to say it?
00:45:36.600 Because theater seems like
00:45:37.720 acting, whereas war seems
00:45:39.440 like the most real thing
00:45:40.460 there could ever be.
00:45:41.720 It's a weird combination,
00:45:42.980 a theater of war.
00:45:44.900 But then you fast forward
00:45:46.340 to Israel and Iran, who
00:45:49.120 have apparently negotiated
00:45:50.480 the war in advance.
00:45:52.640 All right, guys, we're
00:45:53.940 going to take out one of
00:45:55.060 your consulate guys.
00:45:57.080 What you'll do is you'll
00:45:58.300 respond with a bunch of
00:45:59.260 missiles, but give us a
00:46:00.500 warning.
00:46:01.120 Make sure that we have
00:46:01.940 our anti-missile stuff in
00:46:04.180 place. 0.99
00:46:05.260 We'll shoot down your 0.99
00:46:06.500 missiles. 0.94
00:46:08.620 But if a few get through,
00:46:10.840 and we'll put a price tag
00:46:12.460 on it, make it sound
00:46:13.220 expensive and dangerous,
00:46:14.700 and then we might need to
00:46:16.460 respond also.
00:46:18.480 So we'll probably respond
00:46:19.840 in some way that's sort of
00:46:21.980 indirect and not quite
00:46:23.900 enough to start a war.
00:46:25.080 And it's literally theater.
00:46:29.400 It's literally theater.
00:46:31.320 It's two countries
00:46:32.300 pretending to be at war.
00:46:34.180 And not only are they
00:46:35.360 pretending, they're telling
00:46:37.120 us they're pretending, and
00:46:38.900 then they're doing it in
00:46:39.640 front of us.
00:46:41.220 I'm going to pretend to
00:46:42.460 fight back, because that's
00:46:44.200 how my population will feel
00:46:45.860 good that we did something.
00:46:47.580 All right, great.
00:46:48.400 We understand that this is a
00:46:49.720 pretend attack.
00:46:50.520 So we won't attack back
00:46:52.640 too hard.
00:46:54.120 But we might need to do a
00:46:57.340 little bit, just a little
00:46:59.040 mop-up pretend attack after
00:47:01.180 this.
00:47:02.400 And Iran would be, ah, we 0.89
00:47:04.420 thought that our pretend
00:47:05.340 attack would be all we
00:47:06.340 needed.
00:47:06.660 But I can see that a couple
00:47:08.260 of missiles got through.
00:47:09.680 Yeah. 1.00
00:47:10.760 Damn it. 0.99
00:47:11.520 You know, it wasn't as 1.00
00:47:12.260 clean as we hoped.
00:47:13.400 Yes, you're going to have
00:47:14.160 to probably, I don't know, 1.00
00:47:16.440 kill one of our people. 1.00
00:47:17.440 Am I wrong that that 1.00
00:47:19.840 entire attack from Iran 0.99
00:47:21.140 killed zero people?
00:47:23.100 It was one minor injury?
00:47:25.480 I'm not even sure about
00:47:26.480 that.
00:47:27.740 There were zero, it was a
00:47:29.260 major military action with
00:47:30.560 zero deaths.
00:47:32.220 That is a pretend war.
00:47:35.180 That's a pretend war.
00:47:38.480 Now, look at Assange.
00:47:41.200 Assange says that war is
00:47:42.560 basically to transfer assets
00:47:44.200 to other people.
00:47:45.640 Right.
00:47:47.440 Why do you fight a pretend
00:47:49.420 war other than some other
00:47:52.240 reason, like putting your
00:47:55.200 assets somewhere else?
00:47:57.160 I don't know.
00:47:57.940 It's all very pretend.
00:48:01.260 So here's what I think we
00:48:02.540 should do.
00:48:05.020 I think Israel should say 0.99
00:48:07.940 that Iran is the problem, 0.98
00:48:09.320 not the proxies, because
00:48:11.460 fighting each other's proxies
00:48:13.000 is a pretend war.
00:48:14.840 It's just theater.
00:48:15.620 Oh, I'll pretend I'm
00:48:17.380 fighting you by fighting
00:48:18.360 your proxy. 1.00
00:48:19.400 Well, damn you. 1.00
00:48:20.900 I'll pretend I'm fighting 1.00
00:48:22.020 back by fighting your
00:48:23.060 proxy.
00:48:25.500 But now you've got this
00:48:26.740 pretend attack on the
00:48:27.900 mainland.
00:48:29.280 Now, it was a real attack
00:48:30.760 on, you know, the actual
00:48:32.280 homeland of Israel.
00:48:33.560 But because both sides knew
00:48:35.740 that their anti-drone
00:48:38.100 defenses would be really
00:48:39.280 good, drones move slowly,
00:48:41.380 I think everybody knew it
00:48:43.780 was going to end this way
00:48:44.640 with not much in the way of
00:48:45.800 damage.
00:48:46.520 So that's kind of a pretend
00:48:47.820 war.
00:48:48.940 But here's how Israel can make 1.00
00:48:50.480 it real, if they wanted to.
00:48:53.380 I think Israel should demand 1.00
00:48:55.400 reparations from Iran, because
00:48:58.060 Iran has been their nemesis for 1.00
00:49:00.800 years and caused all of their
00:49:02.300 expenses.
00:49:03.540 Iran caused them to spend a
00:49:04.920 billion dollars to defend
00:49:06.160 itself.
00:49:07.220 Iran causes it to defend 1.00
00:49:08.860 itself against Hezbollah,
00:49:10.160 because they back them.
00:49:11.560 October 7th was because of
00:49:13.220 Iran's backing.
00:49:14.140 Every terrorist attack is
00:49:15.460 because of Iran.
00:49:17.420 So here's what you do.
00:49:19.440 You take Gaza, and you call 0.97
00:49:21.920 it reparations.
00:49:23.500 And you say, hey, all you
00:49:25.080 people, if you want to
00:49:26.280 resettle, Iran is the cause 1.00
00:49:28.540 of this.
00:49:29.520 Iran needs to take you. 1.00
00:49:31.080 And if they don't take you,
00:49:32.060 we'll just leave you in these
00:49:32.980 camps.
00:49:34.580 Forever.
00:49:35.020 Forever.
00:49:36.220 So, because your home is in
00:49:37.340 Iran now.
00:49:38.420 If you let Iran be your 1.00
00:49:39.820 daddy, well, you live with
00:49:41.900 your daddy.
00:49:43.420 All right?
00:49:44.140 Israel isn't your daddy. 0.96
00:49:46.420 Your daddy funded your war.
00:49:48.680 Go live with your daddy.
00:49:50.480 And we don't care if you do or
00:49:51.680 you don't.
00:49:52.720 But one thing for sure is you
00:49:54.940 just gave away Gaza forever.
00:49:57.240 Gaza will become an Israeli 1.00
00:49:58.620 property.
00:50:00.080 Managed by Israelis, and I'm not 1.00
00:50:01.840 even sure any Palestinians or
00:50:03.460 Hamas people will ever be let 1.00
00:50:05.060 back in. 1.00
00:50:06.180 Because we got fucking 0.98
00:50:08.360 nothing from trying to make 0.99
00:50:10.740 peace. 0.99
00:50:11.740 We got fucking nothing. 0.99
00:50:14.020 So we're just going to take 1.00
00:50:14.980 Gaza.
00:50:16.460 And anybody who complains,
00:50:18.060 complain to Iran.
00:50:20.060 You can take your complaint to
00:50:21.380 Iran.
00:50:21.740 I'm not even going to answer
00:50:22.440 your question.
00:50:23.600 Blah, blah, blah.
00:50:24.580 Bad things happened to the
00:50:26.500 Gazans.
00:50:27.080 Yes, it did.
00:50:28.160 Terrible things happened to
00:50:29.240 them.
00:50:29.740 Talk to Iran. 0.95
00:50:30.400 Again, we're done pretending
00:50:32.920 this is our fault.
00:50:34.880 Now, in the real world, is
00:50:36.780 Israel at fault for the current 1.00
00:50:38.480 situation?
00:50:39.120 Of course.
00:50:40.440 Of course.
00:50:43.280 They are our ally.
00:50:45.920 But did they participate in
00:50:48.480 creating the current situation?
00:50:50.000 Of course.
00:50:51.220 Are there any innocent people?
00:50:52.640 I don't think so.
00:50:54.100 No. 1.00
00:50:54.440 I think everybody there sucks, 1.00
00:50:55.780 basically. 0.99
00:50:56.980 Just in different ways.
00:50:57.960 I'm talking about the
00:50:58.640 government, not the people.
00:51:00.080 People are fine.
00:51:01.440 I like the people.
00:51:03.260 But, you know, governments are
00:51:04.580 sketchy organizations, and
00:51:06.720 especially if you're in a
00:51:07.920 sketchy part of the world.
00:51:11.160 So if Israel wants to be 1.00
00:51:13.780 serious about this, take Gaza, 0.97
00:51:15.620 keep it, call it reparations,
00:51:18.560 and say, we'd like some more
00:51:20.980 land, too.
00:51:21.680 So if we want to keep going,
00:51:23.300 we'd like to own a little bit
00:51:24.800 of Lebanon.
00:51:27.340 Because Hezbollah's got some 0.99
00:51:28.560 nice property up there.
00:51:29.640 I'd hate to see them lose it.
00:51:32.820 See what I'm saying?
00:51:35.220 Israel has to get bigger every 1.00
00:51:36.700 time they get attacked.
00:51:37.760 Otherwise, it just happens
00:51:38.700 forever.
00:51:40.140 So I'm in favor of them just
00:51:42.340 keeping Gaza. 0.77
00:51:44.040 Do I think that that would
00:51:45.200 constitute a genocide?
00:51:47.180 Yes.
00:51:48.500 Yes, it would.
00:51:49.220 Do I think that going back to
00:51:54.400 the way it was is some kind
00:51:55.800 of an advantage?
00:51:56.600 No.
00:51:57.380 Going back to the way it was
00:51:58.680 will get you more of this.
00:52:00.700 There's nothing good going back
00:52:02.180 to the way it was.
00:52:03.700 Repopulating it would be just 1.00
00:52:04.980 stupid. 1.00
00:52:07.280 So you need a good excuse for 1.00
00:52:09.260 not repopulating it and keeping
00:52:10.900 it.
00:52:12.040 And Iran just gave you one.
00:52:13.200 They just attacked your
00:52:14.440 homeland.
00:52:15.520 You attack your homeland, we're 0.99
00:52:17.460 going to send you back your 0.99
00:52:18.400 people.
00:52:19.360 I know they're not your
00:52:20.340 people, but they are now.
00:52:22.460 Because we can't take care of
00:52:24.780 them and we don't have the
00:52:26.240 resources.
00:52:27.380 But Iran does. 0.97
00:52:28.620 So maybe Iran should take care 0.87
00:52:29.980 of their people instead of
00:52:31.500 putting them in a situation
00:52:32.440 where they can only die. 0.61
00:52:39.640 All right. 0.81
00:52:40.720 Scott is a bit weak on that
00:52:42.480 idea.
00:52:44.460 How about you use a not 0.97
00:52:46.140 fucked up word for your 0.97
00:52:48.060 opinion? 0.98
00:52:49.380 How about you say what you
00:52:50.580 think is important that
00:52:52.520 hasn't been mentioned instead
00:52:54.200 of saying I'm weak on it like 1.00
00:52:56.360 a fucking turd? 0.99
00:52:58.520 How about not saying that 1.00
00:52:59.620 while I'm sitting there reading
00:53:00.680 the comments in front of you?
00:53:02.020 If I weren't here, that would
00:53:03.200 be a perfectly fine thing to
00:53:05.160 say.
00:53:06.200 Like if you talk about somebody
00:53:07.420 who's not going to read it, you
00:53:08.380 say, well, they're weak on that
00:53:09.560 topic.
00:53:10.900 But I'm right here in front of
00:53:12.260 you.
00:53:12.440 So if you say I'm weak on it
00:53:16.760 and you don't tell me what is
00:53:18.720 the objection, you're just being 1.00
00:53:20.660 an asshole. 1.00
00:53:22.900 So I'm going to call you out on 1.00
00:53:24.140 that.
00:53:26.760 I need reparations from the King
00:53:28.480 of England.
00:53:30.640 Yes, you do.
00:53:34.140 All right.
00:53:34.680 That's my idea.
00:53:37.440 Hezbollah got in on the airstrikes.
00:53:39.160 They don't know that their real
00:53:40.340 state's at risk now.
00:53:42.080 Now, I do understand that Israel
00:53:43.420 tried to occupy some of Lebanon
00:53:45.560 at one point and it was just
00:53:47.580 untenable.
00:53:49.720 So that's a different situation.
00:53:51.440 But they've already essentially
00:53:53.140 conquered Gaza and depopulated it. 0.97
00:53:55.980 So that's it.
00:53:56.820 I wouldn't compare that to Lebanon. 0.99
00:54:00.680 All right.
00:54:01.320 Israel pledged an unprecedented 0.95
00:54:04.040 response to Iran's attack.
00:54:07.260 What do you think would be an
00:54:08.580 unprecedented response?
00:54:12.120 Keep in Gaza. 1.00
00:54:13.700 Just say, all right, we're just
00:54:15.180 going to keep Gaza. 0.97
00:54:16.520 There'd never be a better time to
00:54:17.760 do it.
00:54:20.520 Thomas Massey is quite sure that
00:54:22.480 the Israel situation is going to 0.55
00:54:24.800 lead to funding Israel and then
00:54:26.800 making it a package to fund
00:54:28.160 Ukraine.
00:54:29.860 And they'll be they'll be
00:54:31.280 packaged together because that's
00:54:32.720 how the people who like wars can
00:54:35.440 get their war.
00:54:36.380 They'll make one of them
00:54:37.480 irresistible and package it with
00:54:39.360 the one that's resistible.
00:54:41.700 So that's going to happen.
00:54:43.980 Yes, Massey, you're completely
00:54:45.460 right.
00:54:48.800 Elon Musk said in a just sort of an
00:54:51.920 offhand quip to a question that
00:54:54.360 AI will run the U.S.
00:54:55.660 government by 2032.
00:54:57.260 Now, I'll vote against that
00:55:00.600 prediction.
00:55:03.280 I don't think there's any chance
00:55:04.640 we're going to give up the country
00:55:06.560 to AI in 2032.
00:55:08.720 But it's a provocative thing to say.
00:55:10.720 I'm not sure he was totally serious
00:55:12.500 when he said it, but it's
00:55:13.560 it's a it's a head scratcher.
00:55:16.960 I mean, when it comes from Musk,
00:55:18.800 I think what he's responding to is
00:55:21.800 the fact that by 2032,
00:55:23.400 AI will be so super intelligent
00:55:26.000 that we'd wish it were running the
00:55:29.000 country.
00:55:29.740 But we're not going to let it.
00:55:31.500 That's a different thing.
00:55:34.260 At a Trump rally, people started,
00:55:37.260 I guess last night, people started
00:55:38.960 chanting, genocide, Joe.
00:55:41.780 And Trump let them chant, as he
00:55:45.880 sometimes does, you know, he walks
00:55:47.820 away from the podium for a moment
00:55:49.620 to let the crowd do its thing.
00:55:51.740 And they're chanting, genocide, Joe.
00:55:54.140 And then.
00:55:57.960 And then what Trump said was, you
00:56:00.260 know, they're not wrong.
00:56:01.920 He goes, they're not wrong.
00:56:04.160 But you see the problem here.
00:56:07.900 The problem here is that he sided
00:56:10.160 with the people saying it's
00:56:11.380 genocide.
00:56:11.820 And he doesn't want to do that
00:56:16.240 because he's calling our ally Israel
00:56:19.780 a genocidal company or, you know,
00:56:23.500 country.
00:56:24.340 So I think that he was just
00:56:26.680 operating on feel and instinct when
00:56:29.140 he agreed with the crowd because
00:56:31.400 he's going to read in the crowd and
00:56:32.900 getting them on his side.
00:56:34.800 But I feel like he's going to have to
00:56:36.900 fix that.
00:56:37.880 He's probably going to have to have
00:56:40.980 a statement that says the
00:56:43.260 genocide is just the fact that
00:56:45.260 there's a war in general.
00:56:47.560 So whatever you call the
00:56:49.040 genocide, you could just say it's
00:56:51.620 the war.
00:56:52.540 So, yes, Biden is responsible for
00:56:54.500 all the war bad.
00:56:55.820 But technically, let's not call it a
00:56:57.920 genocide.
00:56:58.640 But, you know, it's a funny
00:57:00.200 nickname.
00:57:02.260 So I think he might have a little
00:57:03.920 explaining to do on that because
00:57:06.060 it's not always about the nickname.
00:57:08.420 It has to
00:57:08.800 has to be compatible with his
00:57:10.960 actual philosophy.
00:57:15.100 I'm going to say this again until
00:57:16.600 I get an answer.
00:57:17.740 How do I process the fact that
00:57:20.060 pollsters are telling us
00:57:21.320 unambiguously that Trump is
00:57:23.780 gaining with black and Hispanic
00:57:25.520 voters big time?
00:57:28.120 But yet he's tied with Joe Biden.
00:57:31.860 Who is he losing?
00:57:32.860 What story or trend?
00:57:40.020 He's not losing women because that
00:57:41.900 would be a story. 0.99
00:57:43.620 If Trump were bleeding female 0.99
00:57:46.060 support, there would be a story just
00:57:48.740 like there's a story that he's
00:57:49.920 gaining blacks and Hispanics.
00:57:53.960 Right?
00:57:55.160 That would be a national headline
00:57:56.760 almost every day if he were losing
00:57:59.260 female support at some significant
00:58:00.860 significant level.
00:58:02.100 Who is he losing?
00:58:03.680 Here's what it feels like.
00:58:05.740 It feels like this is your tell
00:58:07.760 that polling isn't real.
00:58:11.780 Because it can't be real.
00:58:13.360 It can't be true that he's losing
00:58:14.820 substantial parts of his most
00:58:17.160 important, you know, the bulwark of
00:58:19.200 the Democrat power base.
00:58:21.640 At the same time, he's not making any
00:58:24.000 difference at the top line.
00:58:26.040 It can't be that the bottom lines are
00:58:27.820 all moving.
00:58:28.340 The top line is stable.
00:58:29.540 Well, what's going on?
00:58:31.820 And by the way, I'm looking at your
00:58:32.840 comments right now.
00:58:33.600 You have no idea, do you?
00:58:36.280 Losing suburban women.
00:58:38.500 Is that the story?
00:58:39.600 Losing suburban women?
00:58:41.460 Because I thought he'd already lost
00:58:43.500 them.
00:58:47.240 Are you sure that's not just a
00:58:48.660 continuation of the forever story
00:58:50.860 that he doesn't have suburban women?
00:58:53.060 Are they actually moving?
00:58:54.580 Yeah, I know.
00:58:58.620 So let's look into it.
00:59:00.060 Let's look into suburban women and 1.00
00:59:02.180 see if that's a move.
00:59:03.300 I feel like they're not moving.
00:59:05.960 Like, that doesn't feel real to me.
00:59:08.320 I feel like, you know, a lot of them
00:59:10.520 are Democrat, but I don't feel like
00:59:11.780 they're moving.
00:59:13.860 I don't know.
00:59:15.600 Why would they not already be there?
00:59:17.760 It doesn't make sense.
00:59:18.600 Well, Libs of TikTok is showing a
00:59:23.880 clip about, there's a, what they
00:59:27.240 would call a male, a trans, trans
00:59:30.500 athlete competing in a girls varsity,
00:59:33.760 200 meters in Oregon.
00:59:35.840 And the trans athlete set a new record
00:59:39.220 for the girls.
00:59:41.240 The trans athlete, like, just 1.00
00:59:43.100 practically, they lapped the field.
00:59:44.500 And it's pretty hilarious when you
00:59:47.180 look at it, because
00:59:48.680 pretty big difference in performance.
00:59:52.520 Now, there are many ways to look at
00:59:54.860 these stories.
00:59:56.860 And I, you know, one way is, my God,
00:59:59.380 what's happening to the country?
01:00:01.720 That's one way.
01:00:02.740 Another is, this is so unfair for the
01:00:05.720 women. 0.81
01:00:06.940 And I totally get that.
01:00:08.800 I totally get that.
01:00:11.060 But I prefer to take the more
01:00:12.760 optimistic view.
01:00:14.500 If you don't mind, you know,
01:00:17.320 nothing's, nothing's terribly all
01:00:19.500 wrong and or all good.
01:00:21.620 There's always an upside.
01:00:23.100 Do you mind if I take the optimistic
01:00:24.740 view of this?
01:00:26.740 Well, in my lifetime, I've seen
01:00:29.080 women make tremendous gains. 1.00
01:00:32.120 And I think most anybody in my age
01:00:34.060 group would say the same thing.
01:00:35.560 You know, I went from a world in
01:00:37.080 which, you know, women really 1.00
01:00:39.180 couldn't work any job they wanted.
01:00:41.480 There really wasn't an option.
01:00:43.020 But now it is.
01:00:43.720 In fact, women are doing better in
01:00:45.260 college, better at buying their first
01:00:47.440 homes.
01:00:48.800 Women are doing great. 1.00
01:00:50.720 So women are higher educated, 1.00
01:00:53.260 less crime than men. 0.91
01:00:56.180 Certainly, DEI is helping them in
01:00:58.380 employment and doing great.
01:01:00.440 But, but what about men?
01:01:04.500 Here's what I say.
01:01:06.060 I believe that men have what I call
01:01:08.140 an indomitable spirit.
01:01:10.100 And you can, you can try to hold men
01:01:13.900 down and you can say, men, we're going
01:01:17.360 to, white men, white men, we're going 0.79
01:01:20.380 to take your jobs.
01:01:21.840 We're going to give them to people of 0.99
01:01:24.380 color and women. 0.94
01:01:26.320 But you're just going to have to put up
01:01:28.040 with it, men.
01:01:28.540 And I think the white men said,
01:01:32.540 huh, what if we don't?
01:01:35.540 What if we decided that we don't want
01:01:37.280 to lose?
01:01:39.500 And what if we want to win this race so 1.00
01:01:41.800 badly that we will remove our penis just 1.00
01:01:44.880 to do it? 1.00
01:01:47.360 So you might say to yourself, my God, this
01:01:49.760 is so unfair to women. 1.00
01:01:50.780 And you'd be right.
01:01:52.560 You might say to yourself, this is, it
01:01:54.980 makes a mockery of sports.
01:01:56.840 You'd be right.
01:01:58.620 But I think you have to appreciate how
01:02:01.340 hard men will try to win when the rules
01:02:03.960 are against them.
01:02:05.320 All right, here are the rules.
01:02:07.520 You can't win.
01:02:10.340 Well, what if I change some things?
01:02:13.300 Like what? 1.00
01:02:14.360 My penis. 1.00
01:02:14.980 If I get rid of my penis, can I win? 1.00
01:02:18.600 Well, maybe. 1.00
01:02:20.520 Well, here's how I summarize this entire
01:02:23.840 situation over the years.
01:02:26.760 Women, take a back seat, men. 1.00
01:02:29.700 This is our time.
01:02:31.400 Men, hold my baton.
01:02:36.740 That's all.
01:02:37.360 That's the summary.
01:02:38.480 That whole thing was just to work
01:02:39.740 over that one joke.
01:02:41.260 Hold my baton.
01:02:42.840 That's it.
01:02:44.020 Yeah.
01:02:44.420 The whole thing was just for that one
01:02:46.420 joke.
01:02:47.060 If it didn't pay off, I'm sorry.
01:02:48.280 All right, J.D. Vance is talking about
01:02:51.380 Ukraine and says funding Ukraine is
01:02:53.580 crazy because they don't have soldiers
01:02:56.220 and we can only make about 10% of the
01:03:00.020 artillery that they'll ever need.
01:03:02.400 So they can never, they'll never have
01:03:04.600 an offensive option.
01:03:05.720 So this is J.D. Vance's analysis.
01:03:10.540 They'll never have an offensive option
01:03:13.300 because they won't have the soldiers.
01:03:16.080 And there's nobody left.
01:03:17.520 They just don't have enough people left.
01:03:19.700 And we can't make more than, say, 10% of
01:03:23.180 the artillery they need for the next few years.
01:03:25.060 So he suggests that they use the Russia 0.91
01:03:29.680 strategy, which is dig in, you know, create
01:03:32.120 defensive lines that the Russians would be 0.96
01:03:34.260 crazy to assault, just as the Ukrainians 1.00
01:03:37.340 were crazy to assault the dug-in Russian 1.00
01:03:40.060 positions.
01:03:41.360 Now, this, of course, would lead you toward
01:03:43.380 a negotiated settlement once you realize that
01:03:46.400 neither side can beat the other.
01:03:48.580 So I think J.D. Vance did a good job here.
01:03:53.200 By the way, what's his background?
01:03:55.720 I know he's an author.
01:03:57.280 But wasn't he working for Peter Thiel?
01:04:00.860 J.D. Vance?
01:04:03.080 Do I have that right?
01:04:05.160 And what was, what's his educational background?
01:04:08.380 Harvard?
01:04:10.380 What was his major?
01:04:13.140 Lawyer?
01:04:14.580 So he's a Harvard lawyer?
01:04:18.420 Harvard-trained lawyer.
01:04:19.940 And then he worked for Peter Thiel.
01:04:22.580 Oh, he was, I thought he was a V-Saint. 0.99
01:04:25.060 He, right.
01:04:26.340 Okay, that's what I was looking for.
01:04:27.920 Peter Thiel, venture capitalist.
01:04:29.760 J.D. Vance worked for him, even though his
01:04:31.760 background is Harvard lawyer.
01:04:33.940 He no doubt learned to think like a venture
01:04:36.080 capitalist.
01:04:36.500 And when I look at his analysis,
01:04:37.760 and when I look at his analysis,
01:04:40.200 I say to myself, holy cow,
01:04:44.520 somebody who knows how to analyze things
01:04:46.520 just analyzes something.
01:04:48.040 Do you know how rare that is?
01:04:50.160 How rare is that that somebody who knows
01:04:52.340 how to analyze something
01:04:53.520 analyzes something?
01:04:55.280 Do you know who else is good at this?
01:04:57.760 Thomas Massey, MIT, engineer.
01:05:01.280 When he analyzes something,
01:05:04.300 you say to yourself, oh,
01:05:06.300 a good analyzer just analyzed something.
01:05:08.740 So you should listen to that.
01:05:10.460 But if you see somebody telling you
01:05:12.720 the moon is made of gas,
01:05:15.100 maybe don't listen to that one.
01:05:17.720 But you should know who are the ones
01:05:19.680 who actually know what they're talking about.
01:05:21.600 And if you're trained as an engineer
01:05:23.420 or a venture capitalist,
01:05:25.120 you probably know how to look at the costs
01:05:27.740 and the benefits.
01:05:28.700 That's what they do.
01:05:30.600 They're trained to.
01:05:31.600 Same with the economics people.
01:05:34.680 So I always say that people think
01:05:36.860 they know how to analyze situations.
01:05:40.720 But they don't.
01:05:42.340 I was going to name a name,
01:05:43.760 but I'm not going to do it.
01:05:44.780 There's somebody who's well known
01:05:47.120 on the conservative libertarian side of things
01:05:50.080 who is very strident in analyzing
01:05:54.580 the situation in public
01:05:56.200 and doesn't have any skill at it. 0.99
01:06:00.020 And I keep wanting to not be a jerk 0.99
01:06:02.740 and point it out. 0.98
01:06:05.940 So I'm not going to name a name.
01:06:07.740 But there's somebody in the public domain
01:06:10.260 who is so unqualified
01:06:11.860 for looking at the big situations.
01:06:15.600 They just don't have the skill.
01:06:18.480 And, well, you know,
01:06:20.600 no, it's not Tucker.
01:06:21.480 Somebody said, is it Tucker?
01:06:22.800 You know what Tucker does?
01:06:24.920 Tucker has humility.
01:06:26.660 And that goes a long way.
01:06:28.880 See if you agree.
01:06:29.960 When he's right,
01:06:30.960 of course, he can be cocky
01:06:33.000 when he knows he's right.
01:06:35.120 But Tucker will be the first person
01:06:37.200 to tell you why he doesn't understand.
01:06:41.140 That goes a long way for credibility.
01:06:43.720 Am I right?
01:06:45.160 When there's something he doesn't understand,
01:06:47.180 like, you know,
01:06:47.900 the deep economics of something,
01:06:50.160 he'll just tell you.
01:06:51.480 I don't know why this isn't the thing.
01:06:54.080 This is all I know.
01:06:55.300 I'm just watching like you are.
01:06:57.600 So the thing about Tucker
01:06:58.900 is that he talks about the news
01:07:02.500 like he was watching it at home.
01:07:06.740 But better than you.
01:07:08.360 Right?
01:07:08.740 Because he's smarter.
01:07:09.680 So, and that's real valuable.
01:07:13.660 That's sort of what I try to do.
01:07:15.320 I try to watch it
01:07:16.280 like I'm watching at home with you,
01:07:18.360 but that I can add maybe some,
01:07:20.760 you know, analytical things
01:07:22.500 just because I'm trained to do it.
01:07:24.740 If you're not trained to do it,
01:07:26.100 you think you can,
01:07:27.900 but you can't.
01:07:29.720 So I'm not going to name names,
01:07:31.180 but you'll notice them.
01:07:32.740 Anyway, J.D. Vance
01:07:33.740 apparently is trained to do this.
01:07:36.360 Thomas Massey apparently is trained
01:07:39.380 to look at complicated pictures
01:07:41.980 and see both sides.
01:07:43.520 So pay attention to that.
01:07:44.780 Give them a little more attention.
01:07:46.640 If you see somebody who
01:07:48.220 has a background
01:07:50.120 that doesn't include those skills,
01:07:52.480 take that into consideration.
01:07:54.260 All right.
01:08:01.680 Ladies and gentlemen,
01:08:04.900 Scott, you're confusing J.D. Vance
01:08:06.560 with Blake Masters.
01:08:08.660 Well, I read today
01:08:09.700 that he worked for Peter Thiel.
01:08:11.880 Did I get that wrong?
01:08:14.980 Give me a fact check before I go
01:08:16.640 because that's a good,
01:08:17.520 that's a really good question.
01:08:19.860 Did I get that wrong?
01:08:21.120 Because I think they both worked
01:08:22.360 for Peter Thiel.
01:08:24.260 Give me a fact check on that.
01:08:28.600 I don't want to get something
01:08:29.720 that important wrong.
01:08:31.160 So make sure.
01:08:34.880 Okay.
01:08:35.460 Yes.
01:08:36.000 All right.
01:08:36.620 So they both work for Peter Thiel,
01:08:38.140 so I'm not confusing them.
01:08:42.840 Yeah.
01:08:43.280 They both work for Thiel.
01:08:45.920 I think that's all we need.
01:08:47.400 All right.
01:08:48.200 Ladies and gentlemen,
01:08:49.000 I'm going to say some more words
01:08:50.860 to the locals people,
01:08:52.460 so they're going to stay on here.
01:08:53.560 But the rest of you
01:08:54.420 will be seeing me tomorrow.
01:08:59.620 All right.
01:09:01.000 See you tomorrow, everybody else.
01:09:03.000 Locals, stick with me.
01:09:04.320 Look at the most.
01:09:05.320 See you tomorrow.
01:09:05.920 Thank you.
01:09:06.080 See you tomorrow, I'll see you for hosts.
01:09:07.740 Lucy.
01:09:08.080 Bye.
01:09:08.800 Bye.
01:09:09.720 Bye.
01:09:11.240 Bye.
01:09:11.880 Bye.
01:09:12.740 Bye.
01:09:13.180 Bye.
01:09:13.860 Bye.
01:09:14.240 Bye.
01:09:14.440 Bye.
01:09:16.740 Bye.
01:09:17.280 Bye.
01:09:17.480 Bye.
01:09:20.200 Bye.
01:09:22.300 Bye.
01:09:22.800 Bye.
01:09:25.000 Bye.
01:09:27.160 Bye.
01:09:27.720 Bye.
01:09:30.080 Bye.
01:09:31.220 Bye.
01:09:32.120 Bye.