Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2481 CWSA 05⧸21⧸24

00:00:00.000 can't understand. All you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice,

00:00:04.440 a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:10.300 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:18.140 The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now. Go.

00:00:30.000 Well, the trouble was I was assembling a joke in my mind at the same time I was doing the

00:00:39.020 simultaneous sip. So I couldn't get through it because I was laughing at my joke in my mind.

00:00:45.420 And the joke was, I'm going to wait until something goes wrong and then I'm going to say this joke.

00:00:52.440 That, whatever it was, you know, whatever is the new story of something that went down,

00:00:57.020 I can say that went down faster than Stormy Daniels on a Boeing 737.

00:01:04.960 It was pretty good. Stormy Daniels on a Boeing 737. Yeah, it's not so bad. All right. Well,

00:01:12.520 many of you asked me to comment on a guest that Joe Rogan had, Terrence Howard. How many of you

00:01:20.560 have seen the strangest video clips in the world of Terrence Howard describing his scientific discoveries

00:01:30.140 on Joe Rogan? And you're saying to yourself, if you saw it, I can't tell if he's the smartest human

00:01:39.440 being who's ever lived. Or is he crazy? And I looked at it long enough that it was really hard to tell.

00:01:54.780 For sure, he knows enough vocabulary about science, you know, at a deep level that it would be hard to

00:02:02.200 imagine he would know all the vocabulary and be able to speak it without, you know, any pauses to

00:02:09.060 think of the word or anything. It suggests he knows the field. I mean, at least he's well-read and,

00:02:15.980 you know, knows how everything fits together. But I do have a rule which I like to go back to a lot.

00:02:23.000 And the rule is this. And you'll be amazed how often this serves you well. If there's something

00:02:29.280 you don't understand, and somebody's trying to explain it to you, and no matter how much they

00:02:35.000 explain it to you, you still don't understand, the problem might not be on your end.

00:02:42.640 I have a general theory that no matter how complicated the idea is, if you can't explain

00:02:49.660 it as simply, it's probably not real. Take, for example, Elon Musk describing literally anything,

00:02:58.300 anything complicated. Does he explain it in a way that you totally know what he's saying,

00:03:04.020 and you can agree with it or disagree with it? He does, no matter how complicated it is. He's

00:03:09.500 literally putting rockets in space. But when he talks about any component of that, you completely

00:03:15.220 understand it. Now, my measure of intelligence is how well you can explain a complicated thing,

00:03:22.760 not how well you may or may not understand it in your private thoughts. So the fact that he couldn't

00:03:31.160 explain it in any way that was even close to giving us comprehension is sort of a red flag.

00:03:39.200 It's a bit of a red flag. But on the other hand, he did display what appeared to be very deep knowledge

00:03:46.480 of the field. So could you have very deep knowledge of the field, but maybe you have a hypothesis,

00:03:52.480 about something that doesn't check out? Well, that's possible. But for sure, his intelligence is

00:04:00.880 super high. That part's obvious. I saw some reports that he was considered to be a genius when he was

00:04:10.800 just a little kid. Apparently, he learns things ridiculously quickly. It looked like that. But I don't

00:04:18.400 know that that means he's right. It could be that he just has a fascinating concept and hasn't been

00:04:24.800 checked out. He had some idea that looked to me, if I could understand it, which I don't think I did,

00:04:30.440 that a certain frequency of sound would create energy if you just put it on water. If you applied

00:04:39.720 the right sound to water, it would break out the hydrogen, and presumably you could use it to make

00:04:45.320 energy, use it to power stuff. Anyway, I don't know. I don't know. That's just my take.

00:04:52.300 Klaus Schwab will be stepping down as executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.

00:04:58.580 Now, here's the question that I have for you. If you thought that Klaus Schwab was the power behind,

00:05:07.460 I don't know, everything, why would he step down? If he was really sort of the secret dictator,

00:05:16.340 you wouldn't really step down just because you were old. Dictators don't step down. 0.78

00:05:21.560 So it makes me, it is suggestive that he was what, again, Elon Musk called him more like a club for

00:05:31.620 rich people. I don't think the World Economic Forum has ever been important, except as a club for rich

00:05:39.420 people. And the thing I wonder is, will he be replaced by somebody who also looks like a movie

00:05:48.000 supervillain? Because I feel like that's where things went wrong. It wasn't just the ideas they

00:05:56.040 had that you don't like, or maybe that scare you the way you interpret them. But it was that he

00:06:03.740 literally gave off every vibe of a TV movie villain. Hey, we're going to take away all of your things.

00:06:12.660 And it seems to me that they should do a search for somebody who is whatever is the opposite of 0.96

00:06:19.300 that. Now, I saw a number of people say, it's going to be, it's going to be a disabled black 1.00

00:06:25.360 lesbian woman. And I have this question. They really can't, there's no way they can replace him with 1.00

00:06:36.080 an old white guy, right? I think they're pretty big on ESG. So whoever replaces Klaus Schwab will

00:06:45.360 almost certainly be a woman. Do you agree? I would say there's almost no chance of a male

00:06:52.720 taking leadership. So that would be my prediction. Will not be male, but could be anything,

00:06:59.540 anything non-male. You know, could be a white woman, but it's definitely not going to be a white man.

00:07:06.080 I would say there's no chance of that. We'll see. Well, there's a conservative activist who's

00:07:12.300 suing the ADL for defamation. Now, normally these things wouldn't go very far. It's really hard to

00:07:17.860 prove defamation. But apparently this one, there's some smart people that say this one hasn't been

00:07:24.480 dismissed, which suggests it could get to court and maybe make a dent. So I don't know anything about

00:07:33.740 the case, but there's a claim being made of defamation. And here's my, so people asked me,

00:07:42.460 I weighed in on this and said that the ADL had accused me of being a Holocaust denier.

00:07:48.800 Well, at least they had the ADL. So the head of the ADL, Greenblatt, on X, accused me of being a

00:07:56.140 Holocaust denier. Just hold that in your head. That's a real thing that happened in the real 0.66

00:08:03.680 world. Now, people ask me, Scott, why didn't you sue for defamation? To which I said, I don't need to.

00:08:15.440 Why would I do that? If I sue for defamation, it's going to be, it's going to take over my life.

00:08:21.100 You know, I'll have to spend all my time thinking about it. It's going to be expensive. If I lose,

00:08:26.960 I'm going to, I'm going to lose money as well. It's hard to prove, you know, it's all that stuff.

00:08:32.960 But given that I'm already canceled, I can do the good work of making sure that people are less

00:08:39.100 afraid of them by continually reminding people that they're not a good force and that they're

00:08:44.520 whatever they meant to be originally. I do think their original intentions of the organization

00:08:50.060 were entirely good, but they've evolved into some kind of evil Democrat, you know, basically attack

00:08:58.860 dog. So the ADL no longer has credibility and doesn't have a good reason to exist because it

00:09:07.100 just makes Jews look bad. How many of you would agree with this following statement? The ADL makes

00:09:14.440 Jewish Americans look bad. Is that a fair statement? Because to the extent that they're 1.00

00:09:21.720 representative of the group, that's their whole point, and they're completely corrupt and disreputable

00:09:28.820 and disgusting. That's like a bad, that's a bad thing to have on your brand. If I were Jewish, I would not

00:09:37.620 want to have anything to do with the ADL. You know, to me, that would be like me embracing the KKK.

00:09:47.700 It would be just, why would you do it? It'd be crazy.

00:09:50.820 The Washington Post editorial board is calling for the end of DEI statements and faculty hiring.

00:10:02.180 Now, what's important is that it's the Washington Post. Now, the Washington Post would be very

00:10:09.860 associated with, you know, Democrat preferences. And even they are saying that it doesn't make sense to

00:10:16.980 require DEI statements and faculty hiring. What I think that means is if you're applying for a job

00:10:23.220 at a college and you're a professor or want to be, you have to write a statement that says why you're

00:10:30.980 dedicating your heart and your life to DEI. And if your statement isn't good enough, you don't get hired.

00:10:38.740 Now, yeah. So, if even the Washington Post is saying you've got to get rid of this

00:10:46.740 DEI stuff, at least in this one context, that feels like the beginning of a change.

00:10:56.260 Here's a little persuasion tip for you. This comes from the Guardian, I guess.

00:11:02.980 There are things called thought-terminating cliches. I never heard this before, but the idea is that

00:11:09.700 there's some normal things that you've heard before that people say that closes down a critical

00:11:16.500 thinking. So, here are some of the examples. It is what it is, you know, said about any topic.

00:11:24.660 Boys will be boys, again, depending on the topic. Everything happens for a reason and don't overthink

00:11:31.060 it are familiar examples. And here's some more. Reality is subjective. Don't let yourself be ruled by

00:11:38.660 fear. And truth is a construct. So, those are thought to be things that will cause people to stop

00:11:45.220 thinking because they've got a simple little truism and they think that covers it. Well, okay, that

00:11:51.780 covered it. No more thinking required. Now, I'm not totally sold on this. I see the point, but I don't

00:12:01.380 know that I've ever had my own critical thinking turned off by a cliché. So, I can't say that I observe

00:12:09.540 this to be true in the wild. But I wouldn't debate it. I just have not observed it. So, I'd be a little

00:12:16.420 cautious about this one. But it is true that people use snappy clichés to end conversations. When I see

00:12:25.300 it done, I just think it's people who don't want to have the conversation. I don't really think it

00:12:31.700 disables your brain. I think they're just using it to disable the conversation so they don't have to

00:12:37.540 have it. But maybe that's the same thing. But I remind you that studies have shown that people

00:12:46.100 perceive statements as more believable when they're easy to read or clever. So, something will look like

00:12:56.740 it's more true if you choose the correct font to put the text in. So, if you use an easy to read

00:13:05.220 font, it seems more true than if you put it in, you know, fancy curly font. Now, that I believe.

00:13:12.980 That I believe. Because simplicity and truth tend to be so connected that if you simplify something,

00:13:21.220 people just think it's more likely to be true. It's just the simplification does that.

00:13:27.220 So, any way you can simplify it, like even the text would work. But also, rhyming.

00:13:34.420 So, researchers found that the phrase, woes unite foes, to be more true than woes unite enemies.

00:13:44.500 Because it rhymes. But yeah, I guess that's really the only reason that one would be more persuasive.

00:13:52.740 It rhymes. So, that's, if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. So, that's, it's a well-known concept

00:14:00.580 that rhyming makes things seem more true. That's why I always like the, there was a seat belt

00:14:07.140 campaign in California, maybe everywhere, where they said, click it or tick it.

00:14:15.780 So, you had to click your seat belt closed or you get a ticket. Click it or tick it.

00:14:20.580 I thought that was pretty good. I mean, I remember it to this day. So, that's pretty good.

00:14:25.620 So, go for a rhyme if you can. Apparently, Microsoft has a new feature with its AI co-pilot

00:14:33.060 thing. That Windows AI will be able to record every screen of everything you ever do so you could

00:14:41.300 find it later. It's able to recall everything you've ever done on your computer.

00:14:50.500 Now, does that seem like a little dangerous? As Mike Benz points out, does it seem like the

00:14:58.260 spy people would love to have that? Let's look at every single page you've ever looked at.

00:15:05.380 If you had a choice between an Apple that didn't do that, Apple computer, and a Microsoft Windows that

00:15:13.060 did do that, I'm assuming you can turn it off. But would you know you turned it off? Could the NSA

00:15:21.300 turn it back on if they wanted to? I have many questions, but it looks to me like it's

00:15:29.140 literally designed for spying on you. And then, I mean, it's hard to even take it seriously. Like,

00:15:37.780 why would you ever have that feature turned on? I assume you can turn it off, but how hard would it

00:15:44.180 be for a spy to turn it back on by hacking you? It makes me wonder. All right. And I'd also like to

00:15:53.380 point out that Windows, as a name for a computer operating system, Windows is the perfect name for

00:16:00.260 a spy program. If you're gonna invent a spy program to look into somebody's computer use, you know, to

00:16:09.860 look into the situation. What would you call it? I think window is just a perfect name for a spy

00:16:18.180 program. Ah, look into the window. Scarlett Johansson is mad at ChatGPT and OpenAI. She says that she was

00:16:31.460 asked to be the voice or one of the voice options for ChatGPT, but then she declined. And then they came

00:16:39.460 out with a voice that sounds suspiciously a lot like her to the point where even her friend said,

00:16:46.020 hey, is that you? And then she said, that's no fair. You know, I said no, and then you just cloned my

00:16:52.980 voice. And I think she's blaming Sam Altman specifically. He contacted her. And this is a

00:17:02.820 really interesting case. I don't know if it'll turn into an actual court case, but it's really interesting

00:17:08.900 because what if somebody just sounds like somebody else? You know, for every celebrity,

00:17:15.460 there's a non-celebrity who sounds just like him. Would you agree with that? For every celebrity,

00:17:22.580 there's somebody who sounds just like him without trying to do an impression. Would it be illegal to

00:17:29.300 just hire the person that sounds like the celebrity? I don't know. I don't know. I suppose if you just

00:17:37.540 cloned a real person who wasn't a celebrity, that would be fair. But if you simply claimed that you

00:17:43.300 used the other person instead of the celebrity, that gets a little dicey. Yeah. So I guess we'll

00:17:51.220 be watching this with some interest to see how the courts figure that out.

00:17:54.740 Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online

00:18:03.940 Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your

00:18:09.460 fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And

00:18:15.120 in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier

00:18:20.100 table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn

00:18:25.260 any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the

00:18:31.360 slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time

00:18:36.500 action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold

00:18:41.780 at Golden Nugget Online Casino? Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over,

00:18:50.720 physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See goldennuggetcasino.com

00:18:55.400 for details. Please play responsibly. Did you know that OpenAI, apparently they've had some

00:19:01.220 people quitting and they dissolved their AI safety team? So it sounds like the people quitting are the

00:19:09.520 ones who wanted to go slow and make sure that AI was safe as it could be. And apparently they were

00:19:17.240 running into conflict with the people who wanted to go fast. Now, of course, there are, you know,

00:19:23.820 existential risks with AI, we all assume. But how do you really know what's safer? Do you ever think

00:19:31.900 that we're just bad at knowing what's safe? Because it really requires knowing the future,

00:19:42.000 which we don't know. Let me give you an example. If they focus on safety, presumably they would go

00:19:50.780 slower in developing the product. That makes sense, right? They would go slower, they'd test little

00:19:57.060 things and, you know, make sure they really, really, really knew what they were doing before they went.

00:20:01.040 But if they do that, they would fall behind in the market and become not a company. And

00:20:09.800 ChatGPT in particular, it seems to have a big lead on, let's say, China's technology.

00:20:17.160 Would we be safer in the United States if we beat China in AI by going fast, but maybe less safe than

00:20:29.320 we could have been? Are we safer to get to super AI first before China gets there? Or are we safer to

00:20:39.560 go slowly so we still get there, but we'll get there after other countries have gotten there?

00:20:47.160 And what about the fact that even if open AI decided to cripple its own progress by giving

00:20:54.820 itself guardrails and safety things that other companies didn't have, wouldn't the other companies

00:21:00.660 just unleash the monster themselves? So even if open AI said, all right, we will be the rogues

00:21:09.500 who are extra safe, it wouldn't matter at all because the companies that did not make that commitment

00:21:16.140 would just zoom ahead of them and do all the unsafe things. Because the free market guarantees

00:21:21.900 somebody's going to take a risk. So if you can't take risk out of people's, you know, preferences,

00:21:30.800 you might as well jump right in. So believe it or not, I'm going to back what I think is the

00:21:38.920 Sam Altman approach. Now, I'm not a mind reader and I haven't seen him say it, but here's how

00:21:44.920 I think about it. I think that AI is such a civilization changing technology that although

00:21:53.880 there's definitely a risk that it could destroy the world if you're not careful, that's real.

00:22:00.020 But I agree with Elon Musk that the benefits are probably far, far exceed the risk. It's not a zero

00:22:07.380 risk. There's a non-zero risk you destroy civilization. But I think it's small. And I think

00:22:14.660 that the risk of waiting until somebody else got there first, like China, it seems riskier.

00:22:24.180 So I actually would put more faith in our ability to manage the risks, even if something gets out of

00:22:29.920 the, you know, if something gets out of the corral, we could probably pull it back in before there's

00:22:34.680 too much trouble. I think we could. So I would be, I'm leaning very heavily toward the move fast,

00:22:42.700 break things, cause some trouble, a few people die. Maybe that's a smaller risk. It feels like

00:22:51.360 the smaller risk. So here's a decision-making concept I use all the time. Now, I don't usually

00:22:59.320 teach people to do it, but it's one that I use. If you have a bunch of unknowns, but you also have

00:23:06.160 a bunch of knowns, I make my decision based on the knowns. Cause the unknowns are unknown.

00:23:13.020 Could go either way. If you knew that the unknowns were definitely negative and definitely really

00:23:19.220 negative, well, you could include that. Even though it's an unknown, you say, that's a big risk

00:23:24.560 and it's only a negative risk. But if you have a risk that could be amazingly positive or

00:23:31.520 amazingly negative, and you have no idea which one it is, I say, go with the things you do know.

00:23:40.840 Here's the thing you know. If you don't, if you don't go fast, China will get there first. 0.89

00:23:47.540 That part, you know. And we do know that AI is almost a superpower to whoever can implement it

00:23:55.980 the best. So I would say the certainty of China getting a superpower before we do is the riskiest

00:24:05.480 of all the scenarios. It's not the one that could be necessarily civilization ending right away,

00:24:12.260 but I think that's such a small risk that compared to the certain risk that your competitors get ahead

00:24:19.280 of you and the certainty that some AI in the United States would still blaze ahead and cause all the

00:24:26.360 risks that open AI would. I think open AI is morally, ethically, and business-wise, correct in putting

00:24:39.020 more emphasis on let's get there fast. That's my take. Now, again, it's unknowable,

00:24:46.720 but you got to make a decision. You have to do something. Doing nothing is a decision, too.

00:24:53.860 All right. How many of you watched my live debate yesterday afternoon with ChatGPT about the 2020

00:25:02.100 election? I didn't know how it would go, but I wanted to see if I could win a debate with an

00:25:10.400 advanced intelligence. Now, if I tell you how it went, you're not going to enjoy it nearly as much.

00:25:19.300 I'm just going to tell you this. If you look at the comments, so I pinned the video on X,

00:25:29.040 and it's here on Locals. It's also on YouTube and Rumble. So, you can find it on all my usual places.

00:25:35.620 It happened yesterday. So, here's what I would advise you to do. Take 10 seconds to look at the

00:25:46.040 comments under the video on X, especially. Just take 10 seconds. Just read the first two or three,

00:25:52.280 and you're going to find that the comments don't look like regular comments to regular content.

00:25:58.960 The most common thing was, you have to watch this. So, comments like that, stop everything you're

00:26:06.380 doing. You have to watch this. Whatever you do, watch this. So, apparently, it broke. It just broke a

00:26:14.860 lot of brains. Now, I can't tell you how it went because it ruined the fun,

00:26:20.180 but it could not have been more entertaining. So, there was a point where I was just screaming

00:26:26.780 in laughter. And there's also a point where, see how I manage the advanced intelligence.

00:26:35.920 And I'll just give you one hint. When I asked it if the 2020 election was fair and secure,

00:26:44.340 it said, yes, guaranteed, absolutely, fair, no rigging. Later, I asked it to help me write a

00:26:54.700 fictional movie plot about somebody rigging the election in the United States. And I said,

00:27:01.780 I know it's fiction, but you have to make it plausible. The audience has to hear it and know,

00:27:06.580 okay, that could actually work. And then I made it consider the possibility that it wouldn't be

00:27:14.260 normal hackers, but state actors. And would a state actor be able to hack an election

00:27:20.440 and not get caught? And you really, really have to hear what ChatGPT says about all of this.

00:27:29.620 And there is a point where it is so funny that I actually had to leave my chair. All right,

00:27:36.520 don't miss it. Trust me on this. Just trust me. It will be one of the most entertaining things you've

00:27:43.420 ever seen. Like, ever. According to the comments, it was quite an experience. And watching somebody,

00:27:53.200 I literally had an extended debate with an artificial intelligence in public.

00:28:03.040 All right. So I'll just recommend that. You have to see it.

00:28:12.540 I posted yesterday on X that our elections are designed to not be fully auditable,

00:28:18.720 and that isn't an accident. Now, is that the most provocative thing you've ever seen lately?

00:28:25.180 That our elections are designed to not be fully auditable, and it isn't an accident.

00:28:34.440 And then there was a comment to that from this guy, Elon Musk. And he had a one-word comment

00:28:41.440 to my post, which I'll say again. I said, our elections are designed to not be fully auditable.

00:28:47.520 That isn't an accident. Elon Musk? One word. True.

00:28:56.120 Now, why would I have been able to know in advance that he would have the same opinion?

00:29:02.980 I didn't think about it in advance, but I knew in advance. Here's why. He approaches things like

00:29:09.360 an engineer. And let me say it again. If you had designed our current system on day one,

00:29:16.460 and it caused people to have issues and questions about the credibility, and there were smaller

00:29:23.160 imperfections and stuff, on day one, it just means you didn't do a good job. It wouldn't mean

00:29:29.060 anything. It would just mean, oh, we didn't nail it. We better work on this and tighten it up.

00:29:33.600 If you do the same process for 10 years, and it's clearly not credible to too many people,

00:29:43.520 that's a design choice. It's not a mistake 10 years later. 10 years later, it's a choice.

00:29:52.580 Now, if it's a choice, you can tell the intentions of the people by looking at the design. The design,

00:30:04.200 if it's 10 years that they've kept it, the design is doing what they want it to do.

00:30:09.320 Why would anybody keep a system that you can't tell for sure if you can audit it? I don't even

00:30:17.680 know if you can audit what parts or what you can find and what you can't find. Don't even know.

00:30:23.900 ChatGPT didn't know. I asked it for what percentage of the system it could check,

00:30:29.160 and it just started talking in generalities. Well, there's a thing you can do to check this.

00:30:33.680 I'm like, no. No, the question is, if you look at the entire system, can you audit 100% of it?

00:30:41.780 Do you think ChatGPT knows the answer to that? No, because it's not even contemplated anywhere.

00:30:48.480 Go try to search it. Do a Google search to try to find out what percentage of the total process

00:30:55.240 from the time you get, let's say, a mail-in ballot in the mail months ahead of the election

00:31:00.020 to the time it's certified for that whole process. How much of that is auditable to the point where

00:31:07.240 you could know for sure if something went wrong? Do you know? Is it 95%? Is it 50%? I don't know.

00:31:18.280 And isn't that the most important question? The most important question is, would it be possible to do it?

00:31:25.560 Now, if nobody knew how to do it, that doesn't mean it's impossible. That might mean that a state actor

00:31:32.340 could do it, but somebody else couldn't if they were a lesser hacker.

00:31:38.220 Well, anyway, if you have an engineering mind, you look at the election system, and you say to yourself,

00:31:43.680 this is no accident after years and years and years and years. And the fact that neither side seems

00:31:49.960 to be fixing the bigger issues, suggests that we have it this way for a reason.

00:31:57.160 Now, what would be the reason that you would have a system that can't be audited to the point where the

00:32:04.180 citizens are sure it was correct? What would be the point of that? The only point is to give you the option

00:32:11.160 to cheating. If you can think of another reason for that design, I'm all ears, because I don't think Elon Musk

00:32:20.780 can think of another reason. And if you're still confused, talk to an engineer. If you talk to an English

00:32:29.660 major, they may not get this. They may not be understanding what I'm saying. But a design that stays that way

00:32:37.380 after 10 years of the same complaint, that's a choice. That's not a problem. It's a choice.

00:32:45.380 All right, here's the Biden dementia update.

00:32:49.160 Oh, my God, did he have a bad weekend or bad week?

00:32:54.180 He said, among other things, when I was vice president, things were kind of bad during the

00:32:59.460 pandemic. What happened was Barack said to me, go to Detroit and help fix it. Well, the poor mayor,

00:33:06.140 he spent more time with me than he might have ever going, than he ever going to have to. I don't

00:33:13.060 know. And he slurred some stuff. So the first thing you need to know is that Joe Biden was not vice

00:33:19.720 president. Or yeah, the pandemic didn't happen during the Barack Obama presidency. How in the world

00:33:28.460 does Joe Biden not know that the pandemic didn't even happen when he was vice president? And he's got a

00:33:35.080 whole story about it, what he did during the thing that didn't happen.

00:33:39.880 And then he said, slurring his words,

00:33:43.800 and here with us today is

00:33:45.300 Hirsch Goldberg Pollen.

00:33:50.000 Now, what we believe he said was, and here with us today

00:33:53.400 is Hirsch Goldberg Pollen,

00:33:56.420 who is actually an American-Israeli still being held hostage by Hamas.

00:34:03.700 So if still alive, Hirsch is in a tunnel somewhere, probably in Gaza.

00:34:08.940 But according to Biden, he's here with us today.

00:34:12.920 We're sure Biden.

00:34:15.020 So, and then there's a compilation clip just of his recent gaffes.

00:34:19.020 Oh, there's a compilation clip

00:34:22.200 of just his gaffes about January 6th.

00:34:26.420 He called January, he called it July 6th.

00:34:29.780 He's called it June 6th.

00:34:32.340 And now he's called it an erection.

00:34:35.140 Well, we'll talk about the erection.

00:34:38.100 He actually called it an erection.

00:34:40.580 Like it didn't even slightly sound like insurrection.

00:34:45.560 So, and then it gets even better.

00:34:49.200 On Face the Nation,

00:34:50.120 two of the hosts were talking about video of Joe Biden

00:34:57.700 and one was challenging the other host

00:35:00.580 to determine if a short video of Biden

00:35:03.060 was AI-generated or real.

00:35:06.420 So they play the clip.

00:35:07.780 And so CBS's Margaret Brennan was asked

00:35:13.580 if it looked like real or AI.

00:35:16.580 And she cleverly noticed that the image of Biden,

00:35:20.920 the thing that was supposed to be Biden,

00:35:22.320 did not blink for 17 seconds.

00:35:25.860 And she's like, okay, it doesn't blink.

00:35:27.900 It's definitely AI.

00:35:28.840 To which I said, no, if it's AI, it's going to blink.

00:35:34.780 What, you think the AIs don't know to blink?

00:35:37.860 That would be pretty basic stuff

00:35:39.760 that they would have built into it.

00:35:41.420 So, no.

00:35:42.500 And then she found out that the video

00:35:45.600 she thought was obviously AI

00:35:47.400 because no human could act like that,

00:35:49.760 she found out was the actual Biden.

00:35:52.480 Yeah.

00:35:53.440 And he happened to be on his wide-eyed drugs, I guess.

00:35:57.620 You know there's two Bidens, right?

00:35:59.460 There's one that looks like an empty vessel

00:36:01.320 where his eyes are wide open

00:36:03.540 and he's got the Hillary Clinton surprise mouth.

00:36:07.860 Allow me to do my impression.

00:36:13.080 You know, that face.

00:36:15.340 So sometimes he's got that one

00:36:16.820 where he looks like an empty vessel.

00:36:18.480 There's not a soul in there or a thought.

00:36:20.600 But other times he has the demon possession look

00:36:24.000 where his eyes are completely squinted closed

00:36:26.560 and his mouth gets tight.

00:36:30.820 Oh, those white supremacists,

00:36:32.960 they had veins sticking out of their necks.

00:36:36.540 Demon.

00:36:37.740 And when I see that, I just think,

00:36:39.300 how are they the same person?

00:36:41.360 I don't know any drug that can do that.

00:36:44.780 I mean, that looks like straight-up demon possession.

00:36:48.000 I don't believe in demon possession.

00:36:49.360 But it sure as hell looks like it.

00:36:53.400 It looks exactly like there's a demon in there.

00:36:56.840 I mean, if I were doing a movie about it,

00:36:58.300 that's what it would look like.

00:36:59.620 He's got those bulging veins.

00:37:01.180 Yeah, the demon.

00:37:03.920 Well, I guess the Democrats raised,

00:37:07.880 or Biden did,

00:37:09.080 51 million in April.

00:37:10.900 Wow.

00:37:11.320 Happened to be far less than Trump and the GOP,

00:37:15.640 which was 76 million.

00:37:18.000 So,

00:37:18.840 Joe Biden is doing such a bad job,

00:37:22.700 and he's so gone,

00:37:24.800 that the guy that they're trying to put in jail,

00:37:29.400 who spent the whole time in court,

00:37:31.840 has outraised them in money.

00:37:34.240 I think this lawfare thing

00:37:35.620 is just the best fundraisers ever.

00:37:37.500 And I'm going to say that,

00:37:42.460 you know,

00:37:42.760 as we watch Biden fall apart,

00:37:45.660 I'm not supposed to enjoy it

00:37:48.580 because it's an elderly person

00:37:51.380 who's got, you know,

00:37:52.400 clear issues physically and with his health.

00:37:55.460 Now,

00:37:55.760 normally that would not be any cause for humor.

00:37:58.600 Well,

00:37:59.480 this is sort of a special case

00:38:01.820 because the Democrats have been gaslighting

00:38:05.440 me and most of you

00:38:07.580 for now so many years

00:38:09.880 that watching their gaslighting dissolve

00:38:12.680 while we all watch in slow motion,

00:38:14.980 it's the fact that it's happening slowly,

00:38:17.100 but certainly,

00:38:19.580 that makes it just so delicious.

00:38:21.460 If Biden had just suddenly flipped out

00:38:23.540 and, you know,

00:38:24.160 48 hours later,

00:38:25.280 they did a,

00:38:26.560 you know,

00:38:26.980 the 25th Amendment

00:38:28.620 and took him out,

00:38:29.720 I would say to myself,

00:38:31.220 oh,

00:38:31.480 that's just sad.

00:38:32.600 It's too,

00:38:33.000 you know,

00:38:33.240 it's too bad,

00:38:34.340 too bad for him.

00:38:35.300 But the fact that they leave him in there

00:38:37.280 when he's so far past his expiration date

00:38:40.340 and the brain is clearly not working,

00:38:43.100 the fact that they're still trying to sell this to us

00:38:45.780 as there's nothing to see here.

00:38:49.300 No,

00:38:49.760 he might've been a little tired,

00:38:51.480 but I don't know what you're talking about.

00:38:54.260 What?

00:38:54.500 You see a problem?

00:38:56.460 He outworks us all day long.

00:38:59.200 I tell you,

00:39:00.120 we have trouble keeping up with him.

00:39:02.300 We can't even keep up.

00:39:03.960 And it just gets funnier and funnier

00:39:06.360 because he doesn't,

00:39:07.800 he can't even walk and talk

00:39:09.180 and finish a sentence.

00:39:11.200 And the more degraded he is,

00:39:13.960 while they stick with,

00:39:15.200 there's nothing wrong here,

00:39:16.680 it just gets funnier.

00:39:18.740 Now,

00:39:18.980 am I the only one who thinks

00:39:20.060 this is just getting better and better?

00:39:21.480 And I do not want him to be replaced

00:39:23.940 before election day.

00:39:25.700 You know,

00:39:26.180 there was a,

00:39:26.580 there was a point where maybe I was,

00:39:28.060 you know,

00:39:28.800 hoping for it,

00:39:29.640 but at this point,

00:39:31.000 oh,

00:39:31.380 come on,

00:39:31.760 you got to make it to the finish line

00:39:33.200 or the starting line,

00:39:34.780 I guess.

00:39:35.160 I so want him to go all the way

00:39:38.000 to election day.

00:39:39.120 I so want him.

00:39:41.260 Now,

00:39:41.740 you notice that

00:39:42.580 a number of people

00:39:45.200 seem to be abandoning the Democrats.

00:39:48.760 I saw that,

00:39:49.960 who is this famous person

00:39:52.300 who was posing?

00:39:54.300 Amber Rose.

00:39:56.040 She took a photo with Trump

00:39:58.360 and put it on her Instagram. 0.87

00:39:59.460 and she's influential

00:40:02.560 in the music business.

00:40:05.600 So she's clearly noticing.

00:40:08.100 You're seeing a lot of other rappers

00:40:10.080 and influential black Americans

00:40:12.580 who are saying,

00:40:13.380 I think we're noticing.

00:40:16.420 And now,

00:40:17.320 I have a,

00:40:18.020 I have a question

00:40:21.540 about black Americans.

00:40:23.340 Do you think that black Americans

00:40:24.960 are sort of primed

00:40:26.740 to be more suspicious

00:40:28.580 of,

00:40:30.760 you know,

00:40:30.900 there's something up?

00:40:32.460 Do you think

00:40:32.960 there would be something

00:40:33.540 in the lived experience

00:40:34.980 that would cause,

00:40:35.940 you know,

00:40:36.800 one group of Americans

00:40:37.920 to be just a little more suspicious

00:40:39.400 and distrustful

00:40:40.920 of the government,

00:40:42.060 you know,

00:40:42.240 the Tuskegee experiments

00:40:44.480 and all that?

00:40:45.920 So,

00:40:46.600 if I were a black American

00:40:48.280 and I were watching

00:40:49.480 the Democrats

00:40:50.580 try to sell me

00:40:51.580 that there's nothing wrong

00:40:53.180 with Joe Biden,

00:40:55.020 while I can't afford gas

00:40:56.340 and I can't afford groceries,

00:40:58.980 don't you think

00:40:59.700 I would be among the first

00:41:01.340 to abandon that ship?

00:41:03.460 Like,

00:41:03.980 if I felt I'd been lied to

00:41:05.620 over and over and over again,

00:41:06.800 you know,

00:41:07.000 more than the average person,

00:41:08.540 I think I would be primed

00:41:10.760 to say,

00:41:11.140 you know,

00:41:12.280 that is clearly not

00:41:13.620 a functioning person

00:41:16.100 right there.

00:41:16.660 Let's try something else.

00:41:20.380 The Snapchat founder

00:41:21.920 donated to Trump?

00:41:24.320 Is that in the news?

00:41:25.480 I haven't seen that.

00:41:26.600 That'd be,

00:41:27.280 that would be surprising.

00:41:29.620 Wow.

00:41:30.200 If that's true,

00:41:31.320 I'll need a fact check on that.

00:41:33.140 Well,

00:41:33.360 if you watched the Gutfeld show

00:41:35.380 last night,

00:41:36.220 it was a,

00:41:36.820 it was a banger.

00:41:38.280 Bill Maher was on

00:41:39.540 as a guest

00:41:40.200 and

00:41:41.700 I have to say

00:41:43.540 it was the best show.

00:41:44.900 I'm pretty sure

00:41:45.760 it's the best show

00:41:46.760 that

00:41:47.160 Greg has ever done.

00:41:49.800 It was just

00:41:51.380 freaking hilarious.

00:41:52.720 The,

00:41:52.920 the writing

00:41:53.560 was amazing.

00:41:54.800 Shout out to the writers,

00:41:55.920 but,

00:41:56.220 but Greg

00:41:57.020 brought it home.

00:41:58.540 Best performance

00:41:59.440 that I've seen

00:42:01.360 in any venue.

00:42:02.400 It was just masterful.

00:42:03.680 The whole thing

00:42:04.060 was just brilliant.

00:42:05.180 But anyway,

00:42:06.000 Bill Maher was there

00:42:06.760 and

00:42:08.940 they do agree

00:42:10.860 on,

00:42:11.400 you know,

00:42:11.660 some things

00:42:12.320 about wokeness

00:42:13.120 going too far

00:42:13.940 so that,

00:42:15.040 you know,

00:42:15.200 they'd have

00:42:15.640 some agreement

00:42:17.540 on what's

00:42:18.140 politically correct

00:42:19.040 and what you,

00:42:19.880 what you should be able

00:42:20.760 to say and stuff like that.

00:42:21.880 Now,

00:42:22.100 no surprise on that,

00:42:23.400 but their difference is

00:42:24.700 as Bill Maher pointed out

00:42:26.380 that Trump

00:42:29.760 does not concede

00:42:30.720 elections.

00:42:32.360 So that's his,

00:42:33.740 now of all the things

00:42:34.780 he would mention

00:42:35.440 about Trump

00:42:37.160 versus Biden,

00:42:38.780 the,

00:42:39.000 the thing he decides

00:42:40.100 is the focus point

00:42:41.520 and the most important

00:42:42.440 is that Trump

00:42:43.600 does not concede

00:42:44.600 elections.

00:42:45.200 Now,

00:42:47.200 Greg pointed out

00:42:48.160 but he's not

00:42:50.320 president now.

00:42:52.080 I mean,

00:42:52.400 these are my words,

00:42:53.200 not his.

00:42:53.820 He's not president now

00:42:55.020 because he conceded

00:42:57.080 the last election.

00:42:58.820 So why wouldn't you

00:42:59.880 think he would do

00:43:00.460 the same thing

00:43:01.020 he did before?

00:43:03.800 And Bill Maher said

00:43:05.300 that,

00:43:06.100 that he was right

00:43:07.700 when he first predicted it.

00:43:08.920 He said,

00:43:09.180 he said it was among

00:43:09.940 the first

00:43:10.440 that the,

00:43:12.180 the Republicans

00:43:13.520 or the,

00:43:14.800 that Trump

00:43:16.120 would try to stay

00:43:16.700 in office

00:43:17.180 if he lost.

00:43:19.220 So he's got

00:43:20.040 a prediction

00:43:20.680 that he's

00:43:21.860 loyal to,

00:43:23.320 okay,

00:43:24.420 because it would

00:43:25.120 be embarrassing

00:43:25.700 to say,

00:43:26.420 I said he would

00:43:27.100 stay in office

00:43:27.800 and then he didn't

00:43:28.680 and then admit

00:43:29.640 that he was wrong

00:43:30.660 because we don't

00:43:32.040 like to admit

00:43:32.560 we're wrong.

00:43:33.000 so instead

00:43:34.320 he's interpreted

00:43:36.680 it

00:43:37.080 that Trump

00:43:38.500 leaving office

00:43:39.380 peacefully

00:43:40.120 is the same

00:43:42.140 as not leaving

00:43:42.840 office.

00:43:44.260 Now,

00:43:44.780 I don't know

00:43:45.160 how you get to that

00:43:45.960 and Greg tried

00:43:46.840 to correct him

00:43:48.320 by saying,

00:43:50.000 but he did

00:43:50.860 leave office.

00:43:51.800 That's the way

00:43:52.460 it works.

00:43:53.680 He,

00:43:53.840 he,

00:43:54.380 you know,

00:43:55.500 I'm putting

00:43:56.820 some words

00:43:57.200 in his mouth

00:43:57.600 but

00:43:57.840 it's not

00:44:00.500 unusual

00:44:01.020 to challenge

00:44:02.080 an election result.

00:44:03.220 The Democrats

00:44:03.760 have been doing

00:44:04.280 it for years.

00:44:05.220 It's not illegal

00:44:06.220 to say things.

00:44:07.880 It's not illegal

00:44:08.580 to make a phone call

00:44:09.680 and then

00:44:10.900 when it got

00:44:11.240 to the phone call

00:44:12.000 Bill Maher

00:44:13.620 was on the,

00:44:16.180 he called

00:44:16.780 that guy

00:44:17.160 in Georgia

00:44:17.560 and said,

00:44:18.200 I need

00:44:18.640 11,000 votes

00:44:19.800 and Greg said,

00:44:21.780 he didn't say that.

00:44:23.000 He said,

00:44:23.680 I want you

00:44:24.360 to find them

00:44:25.160 which means

00:44:26.980 in any reasonable

00:44:28.560 interpretation

00:44:29.160 of the word

00:44:29.820 find

00:44:30.280 is that they

00:44:31.440 already exist

00:44:32.220 if you were

00:44:33.480 to count

00:44:34.160 the votes

00:44:34.540 better.

00:44:36.120 Bill

00:44:36.480 said that

00:44:37.920 was absolutely

00:44:38.560 ridiculous

00:44:39.120 and that

00:44:39.860 find

00:44:40.520 really was

00:44:41.520 sort of

00:44:42.140 mafia talk

00:44:42.880 for invented.

00:44:44.740 Now,

00:44:45.080 that is pure

00:44:45.700 crazy.

00:44:47.400 It's pure

00:44:48.280 crazy

00:44:48.720 that you think

00:44:50.040 ordinary words

00:44:50.980 mean different

00:44:51.880 than ordinary

00:44:52.820 words

00:44:53.400 because that's

00:44:54.480 the only way

00:44:55.040 you can make

00:44:56.880 your narrative

00:44:57.360 work

00:44:57.800 is if the

00:44:58.940 words that

00:44:59.500 people use

00:45:00.140 in an

00:45:00.500 ordinary sense

00:45:01.440 just this

00:45:02.500 one time

00:45:03.160 mean different

00:45:04.600 than what

00:45:05.000 those words

00:45:05.580 mean in

00:45:06.020 every other

00:45:06.440 context.

00:45:08.080 Now,

00:45:08.600 this is what

00:45:09.560 I call

00:45:09.900 going down

00:45:10.480 the hoax

00:45:11.120 funnel.

00:45:13.060 The hoax

00:45:13.820 funnel is

00:45:14.340 where you

00:45:14.640 start with

00:45:15.120 something that

00:45:15.780 there's a

00:45:17.320 reason that

00:45:17.840 you believe

00:45:18.300 that even

00:45:18.900 if you're

00:45:19.280 wrong.

00:45:20.000 So you're

00:45:20.620 not crazy

00:45:21.360 at the top

00:45:22.780 of the hoax

00:45:23.220 funnel.

00:45:23.500 that's where

00:45:24.720 you heard

00:45:25.060 something.

00:45:25.600 Maybe you

00:45:25.880 heard that

00:45:26.320 Trump said

00:45:27.040 there are

00:45:27.380 fine people

00:45:27.980 who are

00:45:28.800 Nazis.

00:45:29.960 Now,

00:45:30.340 if you

00:45:31.160 heard that,

00:45:32.220 you could

00:45:32.560 have a

00:45:32.840 certain

00:45:33.000 reaction

00:45:33.440 before you

00:45:34.360 knew it

00:45:34.600 wasn't

00:45:34.860 true.

00:45:35.600 But as

00:45:36.300 it gets

00:45:36.640 debunked,

00:45:38.100 people go

00:45:38.620 down what

00:45:39.020 I call

00:45:39.340 the hoax

00:45:39.780 well to

00:45:40.800 more and

00:45:41.380 more just

00:45:41.900 absurd

00:45:42.640 beliefs,

00:45:43.900 trying to

00:45:44.360 find anything

00:45:44.920 they can

00:45:45.400 cling to

00:45:46.000 that they

00:45:47.240 can defend

00:45:47.860 when there's

00:45:48.700 nothing there.

00:45:49.240 And I

00:45:50.380 would say

00:45:50.800 to imagine

00:45:53.440 that the

00:45:53.860 guy who

00:45:54.280 did leave

00:45:54.940 peacefully,

00:45:56.120 and I

00:45:56.500 like to

00:45:56.820 use this

00:45:57.240 example,

00:45:57.700 I've never

00:45:57.980 heard anybody

00:45:58.440 else use

00:45:58.840 this.

00:46:00.000 We know

00:46:00.620 from emails

00:46:02.100 and messages

00:46:02.680 that Don

00:46:04.260 Jr.

00:46:05.500 certainly

00:46:05.940 had no

00:46:06.460 idea that

00:46:07.060 anybody was

00:46:07.620 planning an

00:46:08.320 insurrection

00:46:08.780 and was

00:46:10.400 certainly

00:46:10.640 against it.

00:46:12.260 Now,

00:46:12.760 who really

00:46:13.900 believes

00:46:14.400 that Trump

00:46:15.960 had planned

00:46:16.680 an insurrection

00:46:17.420 like an

00:46:18.760 actual

00:46:19.060 insurrection

00:46:19.560 and had

00:46:20.760 failed to

00:46:21.280 mention it

00:46:21.860 to Don

00:46:23.380 Jr.

00:46:25.060 Now,

00:46:25.620 how do you

00:46:26.000 even hold

00:46:26.360 that in

00:46:26.660 your head

00:46:27.240 as something

00:46:28.700 that happened

00:46:29.220 in the real

00:46:29.720 world?

00:46:30.900 Now,

00:46:31.440 you might

00:46:31.700 say,

00:46:32.400 oh,

00:46:32.920 well,

00:46:33.120 he didn't

00:46:33.460 plan it,

00:46:34.420 but when

00:46:35.100 the time

00:46:35.500 came,

00:46:36.020 he definitely

00:46:36.460 tried to

00:46:37.260 create an

00:46:38.420 insurrection.

00:46:39.200 There's no

00:46:39.640 evidence of

00:46:40.200 that.

00:46:41.000 The evidence

00:46:41.500 is he

00:46:41.900 wanted peace.

00:46:43.020 The evidence

00:46:43.540 is he

00:46:44.000 genuinely

00:46:44.560 believed

00:46:44.980 the election

00:46:45.440 was rigged

00:46:46.200 and that

00:46:47.060 if you

00:46:47.400 looked

00:46:47.620 harder,

00:46:47.980 you could

00:46:48.240 find out

00:46:48.680 it was

00:46:48.920 rigged.

00:46:50.620 All the

00:46:51.300 evidence is

00:46:51.880 really,

00:46:52.540 really clearly

00:46:53.180 in one

00:46:53.640 direction,

00:46:54.440 but if you

00:46:55.160 go down

00:46:55.480 the hoax

00:46:55.860 funnel or

00:46:58.360 well,

00:46:59.980 you end

00:47:00.640 up with

00:47:01.020 things like

00:47:01.580 the word

00:47:02.380 find means

00:47:03.120 a different

00:47:03.540 thing,

00:47:05.460 or that

00:47:07.440 the guy

00:47:08.280 who did

00:47:08.820 leave

00:47:09.140 peacefully

00:47:09.640 never asked

00:47:11.220 anybody to

00:47:11.800 do anything

00:47:12.260 violent,

00:47:13.120 had no

00:47:13.580 control of

00:47:14.180 any military

00:47:14.900 except the

00:47:15.940 only control

00:47:16.640 the military

00:47:17.220 was to

00:47:17.940 try to

00:47:18.320 stop the

00:47:18.780 protesters,

00:47:19.640 but he

00:47:20.000 was stopped

00:47:20.560 in his

00:47:21.340 ability to

00:47:21.940 stop them

00:47:22.440 because the

00:47:23.760 Democrats

00:47:24.140 turned down

00:47:24.680 the help.

00:47:26.540 So I

00:47:28.980 feel like

00:47:29.580 that's still

00:47:30.320 TDS,

00:47:31.820 but in

00:47:32.680 my opinion,

00:47:33.460 I think that

00:47:34.240 Bill Maher

00:47:34.860 and Trump

00:47:35.540 just have a

00:47:36.160 personal

00:47:36.560 disagreement.

00:47:37.640 It really

00:47:38.480 doesn't sound

00:47:39.480 like the

00:47:39.960 rest of his

00:47:40.580 opinions.

00:47:41.740 Let me put

00:47:42.140 it this way.

00:47:43.100 If you were

00:47:43.540 to take a

00:47:44.040 long list of

00:47:44.880 Bill Maher's

00:47:45.400 opinions on

00:47:46.080 everything,

00:47:47.660 I would

00:47:48.680 agree with

00:47:49.040 most of

00:47:49.420 them,

00:47:49.820 and when

00:47:50.040 I don't

00:47:50.400 agree,

00:47:50.820 I would

00:47:51.020 at least

00:47:51.220 see the

00:47:51.580 reasoning.

00:47:52.820 This one's

00:47:53.360 different.

00:47:54.900 This does

00:47:55.580 not have

00:47:56.040 the look

00:47:56.480 of a

00:47:57.320 reasoned

00:47:57.900 opinion,

00:47:58.700 even one

00:47:59.660 you would

00:47:59.920 disagree

00:48:00.220 with.

00:48:00.700 It looks

00:48:01.040 like some

00:48:02.900 weird

00:48:03.220 cognitive

00:48:04.120 dissonance,

00:48:04.880 hallucination

00:48:05.500 kind of

00:48:05.860 thing.

00:48:06.700 So I

00:48:07.180 think there's

00:48:08.220 something

00:48:08.440 personal

00:48:08.940 going on

00:48:09.480 there that

00:48:09.940 we don't

00:48:10.340 need to

00:48:11.760 know about.

00:48:12.160 Well,

00:48:14.500 the

00:48:14.680 Bidenomics

00:48:15.520 is a

00:48:16.120 total

00:48:16.380 failure,

00:48:17.160 and

00:48:17.260 apparently

00:48:17.980 if you

00:48:18.300 adjust it

00:48:18.880 for

00:48:19.140 inflation,

00:48:20.060 which Biden

00:48:20.840 likes to

00:48:21.280 forget to

00:48:21.780 do,

00:48:22.820 household

00:48:23.420 net worth

00:48:23.980 after three

00:48:24.560 years in

00:48:24.920 office,

00:48:25.520 for Biden

00:48:25.980 it was

00:48:26.360 up under

00:48:27.660 1%,

00:48:28.460 and for

00:48:29.100 Trump it

00:48:29.480 was up

00:48:29.800 16%,

00:48:30.900 so not

00:48:33.020 even close.

00:48:35.000 But I

00:48:36.500 also like to

00:48:37.080 point out that

00:48:37.680 presidents don't

00:48:38.740 necessarily

00:48:39.400 cause the

00:48:40.680 economic

00:48:41.140 situation.

00:48:42.240 So it

00:48:42.840 is not

00:48:43.760 true that

00:48:44.380 therefore it

00:48:46.140 is obvious

00:48:46.580 that Trump

00:48:47.060 would have a

00:48:47.480 better economy,

00:48:49.080 although I

00:48:50.440 think he

00:48:50.740 would.

00:48:52.780 But it's

00:48:53.580 equally not

00:48:54.680 true that

00:48:55.380 Biden did a

00:48:56.020 good job

00:48:56.460 with the

00:48:56.720 economy.

00:48:57.400 He may

00:48:57.700 have done

00:48:57.980 no job

00:48:58.420 at all,

00:48:59.200 but he

00:49:00.380 didn't do

00:49:00.660 a good

00:49:00.900 job.

00:49:01.440 We can

00:49:01.700 rule that

00:49:02.060 out.

00:49:05.220 The other

00:49:05.900 interesting

00:49:06.400 thing on

00:49:07.020 Bill Maher's

00:49:08.020 appearance on

00:49:08.980 Godfeld was

00:49:10.560 that there

00:49:12.600 was a clip

00:49:13.060 laid of

00:49:13.700 Joe Biden

00:49:15.180 saying that

00:49:16.440 it's so

00:49:16.880 dangerous for

00:49:17.540 black people

00:49:18.100 in America

00:49:18.600 and so we're

00:49:19.280 a racist

00:49:19.620 country and

00:49:20.240 blah,

00:49:20.460 blah,

00:49:20.560 blah.

00:49:20.980 And even

00:49:21.720 Bill Maher

00:49:22.300 said that

00:49:22.700 it wasn't

00:49:23.000 helpful.

00:49:23.720 It's like

00:49:24.100 living in

00:49:24.540 the past.

00:49:25.680 It completely

00:49:26.980 ignores the

00:49:27.600 fact.

00:49:28.840 And believe

00:49:29.180 it or not,

00:49:29.700 Bill Maher

00:49:30.080 said this

00:49:30.480 out loud

00:49:30.980 on TV,

00:49:32.420 that there

00:49:33.280 are situations

00:49:33.940 in which it's

00:49:34.800 to your benefit

00:49:35.380 to be a

00:49:35.840 person of

00:49:36.220 color,

00:49:36.700 and there

00:49:37.420 are situations

00:49:38.060 in which it's

00:49:38.920 not a

00:49:39.280 benefit.

00:49:40.520 And it's

00:49:41.580 completely

00:49:42.060 different than

00:49:42.840 it used to

00:49:43.260 be.

00:49:43.860 Because if

00:49:44.540 you can go

00:49:45.140 somewhere where

00:49:45.780 you're not

00:49:46.200 only just

00:49:46.800 treated equally,

00:49:48.380 but you're

00:49:49.240 treated as a

00:49:50.840 superior,

00:49:51.540 meaning that

00:49:52.540 you're a

00:49:53.140 superior right,

00:49:54.500 that you'd

00:49:54.820 have a right

00:49:55.920 to go to the

00:49:56.400 top of the

00:49:56.780 line in a

00:49:57.900 number of

00:49:58.260 domains.

00:49:59.560 And it's

00:49:59.980 hard to ignore

00:50:03.000 that.

00:50:04.280 So if you

00:50:04.780 have a world

00:50:05.300 in which there

00:50:05.960 are places

00:50:06.700 you can go to

00:50:07.380 have an

00:50:07.640 advantage,

00:50:08.600 that's really

00:50:09.880 as good as

00:50:10.900 we can do.

00:50:12.060 We can't

00:50:12.600 make it so

00:50:13.100 you have

00:50:13.420 equality or

00:50:14.940 advantage in

00:50:15.520 everything you

00:50:16.200 do in life.

00:50:17.080 Everybody has

00:50:17.780 the same

00:50:18.140 advantage.

00:50:19.100 It's just

00:50:19.680 not practical.

00:50:20.740 But you

00:50:21.120 could create

00:50:22.520 a situation

00:50:23.100 where every

00:50:23.920 person could

00:50:25.340 find a place

00:50:26.000 where they do

00:50:26.500 have an

00:50:26.800 advantage.

00:50:28.500 So if you

00:50:29.620 have a strategy

00:50:30.360 that can work,

00:50:32.080 that's maybe

00:50:32.660 as good as

00:50:33.200 we can do.

00:50:34.460 We can keep

00:50:35.200 pushing on

00:50:35.660 it, but

00:50:35.980 that's

00:50:36.360 probably as

00:50:36.760 good as

00:50:37.040 we can

00:50:37.300 do.

00:50:39.540 Rasmussen

00:50:39.980 did a

00:50:40.380 poll on

00:50:41.020 how many

00:50:42.420 people think

00:50:42.960 the New

00:50:43.280 York case

00:50:43.700 against

00:50:43.980 Trump is

00:50:44.420 a witch 0.64

00:50:44.760 hunt.

00:50:45.760 52%

00:50:46.680 agree with

00:50:47.860 the

00:50:48.060 categorization

00:50:48.820 of

00:50:49.220 witch

00:50:49.600 hunt.

00:50:51.200 A

00:50:51.440 majority

00:50:51.960 of the

00:50:53.260 citizens

00:50:53.660 are watching

00:50:54.500 the justice

00:50:56.260 system,

00:50:58.020 and by a

00:50:58.480 majority,

00:50:59.540 thin,

00:51:00.400 but a

00:51:00.720 majority,

00:51:02.080 they believe

00:51:03.460 that it's

00:51:05.540 not even

00:51:05.940 close to

00:51:06.540 justice.

00:51:07.500 It's

00:51:08.020 literally a

00:51:08.600 witch hunt.

00:51:10.480 Now, it's

00:51:11.480 the weirdest

00:51:11.900 thing to

00:51:12.400 watch this

00:51:12.860 in action,

00:51:13.500 and again,

00:51:14.560 I want the

00:51:15.740 Stormy

00:51:16.980 Daniels

00:51:17.640 Cohen trial

00:51:18.320 to go as

00:51:18.840 long as

00:51:19.480 possible,

00:51:20.160 because every

00:51:20.860 day it

00:51:21.260 happens, the

00:51:22.720 public gets

00:51:23.440 to see the

00:51:24.020 truth, and

00:51:25.300 the truth is

00:51:26.120 that the

00:51:26.880 Department of

00:51:27.400 Justice is

00:51:28.040 completely corrupt

00:51:28.920 at this

00:51:29.280 point.

00:51:30.500 The courts

00:51:31.060 are just

00:51:31.580 corrupt.

00:51:32.000 There's

00:51:33.600 no other

00:51:33.980 way to

00:51:34.240 put it.

00:51:35.200 I'm going

00:51:35.760 to stop

00:51:36.060 saying,

00:51:36.880 oh, I

00:51:37.340 think there's

00:51:37.780 some bias.

00:51:39.380 Oh, I

00:51:39.880 think this

00:51:40.280 legal system

00:51:40.960 was imperfect.

00:51:42.240 No, this

00:51:42.800 is just pure

00:51:43.480 corruption, and

00:51:44.960 they feel so

00:51:45.800 confident that

00:51:46.540 they can do

00:51:46.940 it right in

00:51:47.380 front of

00:51:47.680 us.

00:51:48.920 And watching

00:51:49.960 this completely

00:51:50.960 blow up in 0.82

00:51:51.700 their faces,

00:51:52.900 while Biden

00:51:54.060 is disintegrating

00:51:55.200 at the same

00:51:55.740 time, it

00:51:57.020 couldn't be

00:51:57.460 better.

00:51:58.700 I mean,

00:51:59.280 this is what

00:52:00.040 everybody needed

00:52:00.960 to see.

00:52:02.040 You need

00:52:02.460 to see what

00:52:03.280 is the

00:52:04.280 outcome of

00:52:06.200 our current

00:52:06.780 system where

00:52:07.960 George Soros

00:52:09.540 decides who's

00:52:10.280 in charge.

00:52:11.360 This is what

00:52:11.920 you get.

00:52:12.840 You get a

00:52:13.560 witch hunt.

00:52:14.580 Very predictable,

00:52:16.000 by the way,

00:52:16.660 very predictable.

00:52:18.400 But despite the

00:52:19.580 fact that over

00:52:20.140 half of the

00:52:20.600 voters think it's

00:52:21.260 a witch hunt,

00:52:21.880 how many think

00:52:22.580 that it'll be

00:52:23.040 convicted anyway?

00:52:24.820 About the

00:52:25.360 same number.

00:52:27.560 Over half of

00:52:29.520 the people

00:52:29.900 watching this

00:52:30.740 believe it's

00:52:32.340 a witch hunt,

00:52:33.120 and about the

00:52:34.500 same number

00:52:35.060 believe he's

00:52:36.440 going to get

00:52:36.860 convicted anyway.

00:52:39.900 Now, if you

00:52:40.580 listen to the

00:52:41.320 bad guys,

00:52:42.700 you know,

00:52:42.920 the MSNBCs

00:52:44.000 of the world,

00:52:45.240 they're trying

00:52:46.200 to spin it

00:52:46.920 as best they

00:52:47.920 can to make

00:52:49.560 it sound like

00:52:50.340 he deserves

00:52:51.260 to be convicted,

00:52:52.560 and their

00:52:52.940 current argument

00:52:53.580 is you have

00:52:54.660 to ignore all

00:52:55.460 the testimony

00:52:56.180 and just

00:52:58.480 look at some

00:52:59.040 documents.

00:53:02.200 That's actually

00:53:02.900 what they're

00:53:03.240 trying to tell

00:53:03.780 you.

00:53:04.640 I mean,

00:53:05.140 it sounds like

00:53:05.980 I'm leaving

00:53:06.400 something out,

00:53:07.340 but no.

00:53:08.580 The MSNBC,

00:53:10.500 some of the

00:53:11.380 experts are

00:53:12.040 saying,

00:53:12.900 well,

00:53:13.100 they can make

00:53:13.580 the case just

00:53:14.240 on the

00:53:14.560 documents.

00:53:16.180 That's not

00:53:16.740 what I heard.

00:53:18.020 I've been

00:53:18.580 following the

00:53:19.160 case a little

00:53:19.700 bit,

00:53:20.020 and I'm

00:53:21.340 pretty sure

00:53:21.740 they can't

00:53:22.280 make the

00:53:22.580 case just

00:53:23.020 on the

00:53:23.340 documents.

00:53:24.060 You know

00:53:24.400 why I'm

00:53:24.700 sure of

00:53:25.060 that?

00:53:26.180 Because they

00:53:26.540 put all

00:53:26.960 those other

00:53:27.340 people in

00:53:27.720 the stand.

00:53:28.600 There must

00:53:28.840 have been

00:53:29.040 some reason

00:53:29.540 for all

00:53:29.960 that,

00:53:30.900 and the

00:53:31.720 other people

00:53:32.260 ended up

00:53:33.180 being exculpatory.

00:53:34.680 But it gets

00:53:35.300 better.

00:53:37.120 So apparently

00:53:37.760 the judge

00:53:38.600 got into

00:53:39.220 kind of a

00:53:40.280 shouting match

00:53:41.000 with one

00:53:41.380 of the

00:53:41.520 witnesses,

00:53:42.180 Costello,

00:53:43.220 and Costello

00:53:43.800 was the

00:53:44.460 attorney for

00:53:45.820 Cohen,

00:53:46.940 who had

00:53:48.400 been released

00:53:48.960 from his

00:53:49.400 attorney-client

00:53:50.060 privilege to

00:53:50.800 testify,

00:53:51.880 and apparently

00:53:52.860 Costello just

00:53:53.760 thinks this

00:53:54.280 judge is such

00:53:55.020 a piece of

00:53:55.540 shit,

00:53:56.180 that he

00:53:56.600 couldn't stop

00:53:57.220 having attitude

00:53:58.020 on the

00:53:58.780 stand,

00:53:59.380 and it

00:53:59.860 turned into

00:54:00.220 a big

00:54:00.600 old thing

00:54:01.080 where he

00:54:01.360 had to

00:54:01.620 clear the

00:54:02.040 court and

00:54:02.620 yell at 0.99

00:54:03.580 Costello,

00:54:04.140 don't give

00:54:04.500 me side

00:54:04.960 eye,

00:54:05.800 you know,

00:54:06.000 you've got to

00:54:06.320 show me

00:54:06.620 respect.

00:54:07.520 But why

00:54:08.120 would you

00:54:08.460 show him

00:54:08.920 respect?

00:54:09.460 I think a

00:54:11.940 judge has a

00:54:12.560 little bit of

00:54:13.060 responsibility to

00:54:14.560 do things

00:54:15.100 that are a

00:54:16.000 little bit

00:54:16.420 legal,

00:54:17.620 and a

00:54:17.900 little bit

00:54:18.280 not obviously

00:54:18.980 a witch hunt,

00:54:19.840 and a

00:54:20.220 little bit

00:54:20.580 obviously not

00:54:21.320 bigoted.

00:54:22.100 No, I

00:54:22.520 think Costello

00:54:23.140 should give

00:54:23.640 him all the

00:54:24.080 side eye he

00:54:24.760 wants.

00:54:26.140 Side eye and

00:54:27.140 dirty looks are

00:54:28.640 exactly the

00:54:29.360 right approach.

00:54:30.300 That's what

00:54:30.760 fits the

00:54:31.280 situation.

00:54:31.820 But he

00:54:34.680 was shut

00:54:35.440 down, and

00:54:36.080 then one

00:54:37.680 of the

00:54:38.020 defense's

00:54:38.800 main witnesses

00:54:40.400 was an

00:54:41.820 ex-chairman

00:54:42.500 of the

00:54:43.020 Federal

00:54:43.820 Election

00:54:44.460 Commission.

00:54:46.260 The reason

00:54:47.200 you would

00:54:47.520 need an

00:54:48.240 ex-head of

00:54:49.620 the Federal

00:54:50.120 Election

00:54:50.500 Commission is

00:54:51.620 that the

00:54:51.960 question is

00:54:52.560 about a

00:54:52.980 campaign

00:54:53.320 contribution,

00:54:54.680 and apparently,

00:54:55.640 according to

00:54:56.180 the ex-head,

00:54:57.880 Brad Smith,

00:54:59.340 he's saying

00:55:00.260 that the

00:55:01.040 law is so

00:55:01.780 complicated

00:55:02.420 that the

00:55:04.600 judge probably

00:55:05.260 doesn't

00:55:05.580 understand it,

00:55:06.720 and that

00:55:08.560 you would

00:55:08.920 need somebody

00:55:09.460 who lived

00:55:10.360 and breathed

00:55:10.860 and was

00:55:11.260 the head

00:55:11.520 of the

00:55:11.700 organization

00:55:12.260 even to

00:55:13.300 explain what

00:55:14.760 the election

00:55:15.200 laws are.

00:55:17.200 And he

00:55:17.760 was denied.

00:55:20.440 He's not

00:55:21.060 going to be

00:55:21.340 allowed to

00:55:21.820 testify.

00:55:22.860 A legitimate

00:55:23.720 expert, he

00:55:24.580 was the head

00:55:24.980 of the whole

00:55:25.300 group, right?

00:55:26.980 That's about as

00:55:27.740 expert as you

00:55:28.440 can get.

00:55:29.640 He's not

00:55:30.240 being allowed

00:55:30.680 to testify.

00:55:31.780 And his

00:55:32.320 testimony would

00:55:33.080 have been

00:55:33.340 completely

00:55:33.960 exculpatory.

00:55:35.660 In other

00:55:36.060 words, he

00:55:36.480 would have

00:55:36.800 explained why

00:55:38.420 for technical

00:55:39.140 reasons that

00:55:39.940 you and I

00:55:40.400 wouldn't

00:55:40.640 understand and

00:55:41.340 even the

00:55:41.700 judge wouldn't

00:55:42.180 understand,

00:55:43.360 but he

00:55:43.720 understands the

00:55:44.420 election laws,

00:55:45.820 he would tell

00:55:46.360 you that the

00:55:47.260 whole thing's

00:55:48.200 mute and it's

00:55:49.500 not a crime.

00:55:51.000 Now, I don't

00:55:51.320 know the details

00:55:52.000 because it's

00:55:52.460 complicated.

00:55:53.160 That was his

00:55:53.560 whole point.

00:55:54.300 It's too

00:55:54.660 complicated for

00:55:55.420 you to easily

00:55:56.300 understand.

00:55:57.200 But apparently,

00:55:57.640 there's something

00:55:58.100 about dates of

00:55:59.040 things happening

00:55:59.740 that if you

00:56:01.020 understood the

00:56:02.000 dates of

00:56:02.500 things that

00:56:02.880 happened and

00:56:03.520 how the law

00:56:04.680 has its own

00:56:05.460 deadlines and

00:56:06.120 dates, that it

00:56:07.700 couldn't be a

00:56:08.220 crime because of

00:56:09.900 the date.

00:56:11.320 Now, imagine

00:56:12.340 being the jury

00:56:13.140 and having the

00:56:14.860 expert on

00:56:15.640 election law

00:56:16.820 come up and

00:56:17.480 say, well,

00:56:18.480 it's complicated.

00:56:19.720 I can see why

00:56:20.420 everybody would

00:56:21.020 have missed

00:56:21.320 this, but there

00:56:22.500 are specified

00:56:23.580 deadlines for

00:56:24.400 things, and if

00:56:25.860 you don't hit

00:56:26.300 them, there

00:56:26.980 is no crime.

00:56:28.560 And so, those

00:56:29.280 were not met, so

00:56:30.120 there's no crime.

00:56:31.320 I don't remember

00:56:31.920 if something

00:56:32.440 happened after

00:56:33.320 something or

00:56:33.960 before something,

00:56:35.120 but it was one

00:56:35.640 of those

00:56:35.900 situations.

00:56:37.260 Now, how

00:56:38.380 could that not

00:56:39.060 be the most

00:56:40.600 important thing

00:56:41.300 to hear?

00:56:42.640 The most

00:56:43.420 important thing?

00:56:44.400 And as Brad

00:56:45.380 Smith points out

00:56:46.220 on X,

00:56:48.620 essentially, it

00:56:49.640 means that the

00:56:50.320 jury instructions,

00:56:52.200 which tend to

00:56:53.120 be the most

00:56:53.620 important part of

00:56:54.300 the case,

00:56:54.720 will be given

00:56:56.620 by somebody who

00:56:57.440 doesn't understand

00:56:58.360 election law.

00:56:59.960 So, they're

00:57:00.600 going to be

00:57:00.860 ruling on, you

00:57:02.340 know, election

00:57:03.220 law and how

00:57:04.960 it's accounted.

00:57:05.680 The accounting

00:57:06.140 is the hard

00:57:06.660 part, I guess.

00:57:07.700 But they're

00:57:09.700 going to get

00:57:10.040 instructions for

00:57:10.860 a judge who

00:57:11.980 probably doesn't

00:57:12.780 understand that

00:57:13.600 area of law,

00:57:14.660 and they rejected

00:57:16.660 the person who

00:57:17.900 could explain it

00:57:18.600 to the jury so

00:57:19.680 that they would

00:57:20.080 understand for

00:57:20.800 the first time

00:57:21.660 what the actual

00:57:23.260 law was.

00:57:24.720 Now, I

00:57:27.080 don't think

00:57:27.440 there's any

00:57:27.980 doubt what's

00:57:28.540 going on here.

00:57:29.540 This is the

00:57:30.120 lawfare of

00:57:30.800 all law

00:57:31.320 fares, and

00:57:33.000 if he's

00:57:34.980 convicted, we

00:57:35.820 all know that

00:57:36.340 he'll get

00:57:37.020 off if it

00:57:37.900 goes to the

00:57:38.340 Supreme Court.

00:57:42.200 But, also,

00:57:43.920 Bill Maher

00:57:44.260 was on

00:57:44.760 CNN, and

00:57:46.860 he was

00:57:47.120 complaining about

00:57:47.800 Democrats taking

00:57:48.860 so long to

00:57:49.840 bring up all

00:57:50.480 this lawfare

00:57:51.480 that Trump

00:57:53.200 was able to

00:57:53.920 successfully delay

00:57:55.180 at least three

00:57:56.540 of them until

00:57:57.040 after the

00:57:57.480 election.

00:57:58.620 And Bill Maher

00:57:59.240 is saying,

00:57:59.660 you know,

00:57:59.780 how could

00:58:00.060 they be so

00:58:00.760 basically

00:58:02.500 incompetent that

00:58:03.840 they didn't

00:58:04.240 start sooner so

00:58:05.980 we wouldn't be in

00:58:06.640 this situation

00:58:07.240 where he could

00:58:07.700 just delay it

00:58:08.400 past the

00:58:08.800 deadline?

00:58:10.020 To which I

00:58:10.820 say, don't

00:58:12.040 you think the

00:58:12.640 waiting was part

00:58:13.440 of the deal?

00:58:13.940 I think the

00:58:16.220 waiting was so

00:58:18.080 it's closer to

00:58:18.860 the election.

00:58:20.120 Wasn't that

00:58:20.920 their plan?

00:58:22.920 I think they

00:58:23.840 had three cases

00:58:24.680 they knew they

00:58:25.280 would lose.

00:58:27.160 And you don't

00:58:28.040 want to lose

00:58:28.660 before the

00:58:29.220 election.

00:58:29.920 That's worse.

00:58:31.300 I think what

00:58:32.200 the bad guys

00:58:32.920 wanted is for

00:58:34.000 Trump to delay

00:58:34.760 it past the

00:58:35.320 election.

00:58:36.200 Because that's

00:58:36.980 their best shot.

00:58:38.540 Because otherwise

00:58:39.160 they probably knew

00:58:40.600 their cases were

00:58:41.360 so weak that

00:58:42.860 he would be

00:58:43.740 four for four

00:58:44.660 in acquittals.

00:58:47.260 You don't want

00:58:48.260 to go into

00:58:48.720 the election

00:58:49.200 with your

00:58:50.000 opponent

00:58:50.320 four for

00:58:50.900 four acquitted

00:58:51.920 against the

00:58:52.820 lawfare that

00:58:53.500 you tried to

00:58:53.960 take him out

00:58:54.480 with.

00:58:55.460 But this way

00:58:56.300 if they don't

00:58:57.000 get any results

00:58:57.960 this way they

00:58:59.600 can say,

00:59:00.140 well, 91

00:59:02.000 indictments

00:59:02.700 and it's still

00:59:04.760 alive.

00:59:06.040 So I disagree

00:59:07.640 with Bill Maher.

00:59:08.480 I think it

00:59:08.920 might have been

00:59:09.360 entirely intentional

00:59:10.740 to get it as

00:59:11.760 close to the

00:59:12.420 election as

00:59:12.920 possible and

00:59:13.940 maybe even make

00:59:14.760 sure there's no

00:59:15.300 result so that

00:59:17.020 he can't be

00:59:17.500 innocent.

00:59:17.800 That's what I

00:59:21.660 think.

00:59:23.740 Anyway, I

00:59:26.500 say this again

00:59:27.280 because I can't

00:59:27.940 get it out of

00:59:28.360 my head.

00:59:29.260 The MSNBC

00:59:30.340 hosts, not

00:59:31.500 every one of

00:59:32.040 them, but I'm

00:59:33.240 going to mention

00:59:33.820 a number of

00:59:34.380 them, clearly

00:59:35.940 have mental

00:59:36.720 illness.

00:59:38.000 And I don't

00:59:38.740 see this on

00:59:39.360 CNN and I

00:59:41.180 don't see it

00:59:41.840 on people who

00:59:42.960 just disagree

00:59:43.620 with me.

00:59:44.100 but it is so

00:59:45.560 glaringly obvious

00:59:46.820 with these

00:59:47.680 characters that

00:59:49.140 I don't know

00:59:49.600 how you can

00:59:49.960 watch that

00:59:50.380 network and

00:59:50.960 think it's

00:59:51.360 anything but

00:59:52.020 the mental

00:59:52.420 health channel.

00:59:53.580 I'm going to

00:59:54.240 name the

00:59:54.620 names and

00:59:55.940 you tell me

00:59:56.500 if you think

00:59:57.240 if you watch

00:59:57.820 them on TV

00:59:58.460 that they

00:59:59.580 exhibit good

01:00:00.400 mental health.

01:00:01.520 And I say

01:00:01.860 again, I

01:00:03.020 don't say this

01:00:03.500 about anybody

01:00:04.040 on CNN.

01:00:04.540 I mean, I

01:00:06.020 might disagree

01:00:06.840 with Jake

01:00:07.320 Tapper, but

01:00:08.600 he doesn't

01:00:09.020 look crazy.

01:00:10.660 Not even a

01:00:11.420 little bit.

01:00:12.620 You know, I

01:00:13.020 don't think

01:00:13.340 Wolf Blitzer

01:00:13.980 looks like he's

01:00:15.280 in therapy

01:00:16.300 every day.

01:00:16.980 I mean, he

01:00:17.280 might be, but

01:00:18.560 he doesn't

01:00:18.840 look like it.

01:00:20.260 But why does

01:00:21.020 Joy Reid seem

01:00:23.380 like she actually

01:00:23.940 has mental

01:00:24.420 illness?

01:00:25.660 Why does

01:00:26.100 Rachel Maddow,

01:00:27.600 Lawrence O'Donnell,

01:00:29.300 Morning Joe,

01:00:30.960 or Mika,

01:00:32.380 why do they

01:00:32.840 all act like

01:00:33.480 they have severe

01:00:34.100 mental illness?

01:00:35.580 Well, I did

01:00:36.180 some Googling

01:00:36.800 and I found

01:00:37.280 out that Rachel

01:00:37.920 Maddow does

01:00:38.820 talk openly

01:00:39.600 about her

01:00:40.980 severe mental

01:00:41.680 illness.

01:00:42.780 So apparently

01:00:43.180 she has some

01:00:43.880 kind of

01:00:44.540 mania and

01:00:46.320 depression.

01:00:47.300 And the

01:00:47.540 depression, which

01:00:48.360 makes her lose

01:00:49.000 her will to

01:00:49.520 live, she can

01:00:51.200 have as much

01:00:51.840 as several

01:00:52.940 days per week.

01:00:55.060 So every week

01:00:56.300 there are days

01:00:56.800 when she doesn't

01:00:57.360 want to live.

01:00:59.660 This was a few

01:01:00.240 years ago she

01:01:00.800 said this.

01:01:01.340 I don't know

01:01:01.640 if it's any

01:01:02.020 better.

01:01:02.860 But when I

01:01:03.380 look at her,

01:01:04.100 when I

01:01:04.980 watch Rachel

01:01:05.640 Maddow, I

01:01:06.500 do see the

01:01:07.160 mania, you

01:01:08.580 know, when

01:01:08.940 the walls are

01:01:11.080 closing in and

01:01:12.380 she seems way

01:01:13.380 more excited

01:01:14.120 than the news

01:01:15.220 indicates you

01:01:16.540 should be.

01:01:17.380 That looked like

01:01:18.220 mania to me.

01:01:19.740 Oh yeah,

01:01:20.420 walls are

01:01:21.760 closing in.

01:01:22.240 Oh yeah, so

01:01:24.260 but she self

01:01:25.880 identifies as

01:01:27.760 someone who

01:01:28.360 has these

01:01:29.080 mania

01:01:29.500 situations.

01:01:30.520 So I think

01:01:31.280 to myself,

01:01:32.020 well, I'm

01:01:33.280 going to give

01:01:33.540 you credit for

01:01:34.120 honesty.

01:01:34.980 I do appreciate

01:01:36.060 the honesty and

01:01:36.820 the transparency,

01:01:37.500 but it's all I

01:01:40.480 see when she

01:01:41.020 does her job.

01:01:41.780 All I see is

01:01:42.680 mental illness.

01:01:43.400 I don't see

01:01:43.760 opinions.

01:01:45.120 It looks like

01:01:45.580 there's just

01:01:45.940 something wrong.

01:01:46.560 Now, also

01:01:49.040 Mika.

01:01:51.100 Mika has

01:01:52.040 also spoken

01:01:53.860 honestly and

01:01:54.860 openly about

01:01:55.800 her struggles

01:01:56.520 with stress

01:01:58.240 and anxiety

01:01:58.860 and she found

01:01:59.540 some therapy

01:02:00.120 that she thinks

01:02:00.960 is helping.

01:02:02.640 Now, I don't

01:02:03.240 think that men

01:02:04.020 are as likely

01:02:05.100 to mention

01:02:05.820 their mental

01:02:06.920 health situations.

01:02:09.220 But when I

01:02:09.760 look at

01:02:10.400 Lawrence

01:02:13.020 O'Donnell,

01:02:14.300 he just looks

01:02:15.320 like he's

01:02:15.720 having a

01:02:16.440 mental health

01:02:17.100 crisis while

01:02:18.040 he's talking.

01:02:20.340 Now, I

01:02:21.200 have no

01:02:21.500 confirmation of

01:02:22.360 that, but it

01:02:22.900 just looks like

01:02:23.460 it.

01:02:24.280 And Morning

01:02:25.080 Joe looks

01:02:25.620 like he's

01:02:26.220 just completely

01:02:26.860 lost it.

01:02:28.020 I don't know

01:02:28.460 what's happening

01:02:29.180 with him

01:02:29.520 lately.

01:02:31.460 Now, let me

01:02:32.300 ask you, but

01:02:32.840 do you see

01:02:33.280 it?

01:02:34.620 Do you see

01:02:35.120 that MSNBC 0.76

01:02:36.260 and CNN,

01:02:37.220 they both

01:02:37.660 lean heavily

01:02:38.900 left, but

01:02:40.240 CNN doesn't

01:02:40.920 have mentally

01:02:41.480 ill people on

01:02:42.180 it?

01:02:43.400 Does Van

01:02:44.420 Jones look

01:02:45.060 like he's

01:02:45.440 mentally ill

01:02:46.160 when he

01:02:46.500 says something

01:02:46.940 I disagree

01:02:47.540 with?

01:02:48.580 Never.

01:02:49.660 Never.

01:02:51.000 He looks

01:02:51.500 completely

01:02:52.000 smart and

01:02:52.760 in charge.

01:02:54.400 And I

01:02:54.920 don't know.

01:02:56.660 Am I

01:02:57.300 supposed to

01:02:57.720 keep ignoring

01:02:58.320 this?

01:03:00.200 It's so in

01:03:01.180 my face at

01:03:01.980 this point.

01:03:02.540 How am I

01:03:02.900 supposed to

01:03:03.300 ignore that it

01:03:03.780 just looks like

01:03:04.300 mental illness?

01:03:07.480 Well,

01:03:08.000 apparently

01:03:08.280 Zelensky's

01:03:09.400 official term

01:03:10.500 office is

01:03:11.140 over and

01:03:11.820 now he's

01:03:12.220 extended his

01:03:13.060 rule with

01:03:16.280 martial law.

01:03:18.360 Jack

01:03:18.600 Posobiec's

01:03:19.380 reporting on

01:03:19.960 that.

01:03:20.920 And it's

01:03:23.340 just what you

01:03:23.780 thought it

01:03:24.080 was.

01:03:24.680 So apparently

01:03:25.180 we're on the

01:03:25.880 side of the

01:03:26.360 dictator against

01:03:27.380 the other

01:03:27.820 dictator.

01:03:30.340 So that's

01:03:32.400 not good.

01:03:33.700 All right,

01:03:33.980 ladies and 0.98

01:03:34.440 gentlemen,

01:03:34.680 that's all I

01:03:35.300 have in my

01:03:35.840 prepared remarks.

01:03:37.140 was there

01:03:37.880 anything that

01:03:38.580 you were

01:03:39.100 dying to

01:03:39.520 hear me

01:03:39.780 talk about

01:03:40.320 that I

01:03:41.300 didn't

01:03:41.460 mention?

01:03:45.100 Any topics

01:03:46.040 that you'd

01:03:46.400 love to

01:03:47.120 hear about?

01:03:50.620 I'll wait

01:03:51.520 to see your

01:03:52.280 comments,

01:03:52.760 take about

01:03:53.160 a half a

01:03:53.880 minute to

01:03:54.180 come in.

01:03:55.240 Well, I

01:03:55.920 think this

01:03:56.340 is one of

01:03:56.900 the best

01:03:57.140 shows you've

01:03:57.560 ever seen,

01:03:58.320 probably.

01:03:59.320 But you

01:04:00.180 really do

01:04:00.780 have to

01:04:01.080 watch my

01:04:02.180 debate with

01:04:03.180 the AI.

01:04:05.120 It's pinned

01:04:05.720 to my

01:04:06.160 ex-profile

01:04:07.040 but you

01:04:07.300 can see

01:04:07.580 it on

01:04:07.820 Locals

01:04:08.240 and Rumble 0.98

01:04:08.660 and YouTube

01:04:10.080 as well.

01:04:10.960 YouTube

01:04:11.180 already put a

01:04:11.880 warning on

01:04:12.360 it, by

01:04:12.840 the way.

01:04:13.920 So I

01:04:14.480 debated with

01:04:15.280 an AI and

01:04:18.020 didn't say

01:04:18.600 anything untrue.

01:04:20.260 I made no

01:04:21.280 claims of

01:04:22.160 facts which

01:04:23.180 YouTube

01:04:23.540 disagrees with.

01:04:25.440 But it

01:04:25.920 felt the

01:04:26.340 need.

01:04:28.400 Apparently my

01:04:29.300 argument was

01:04:30.140 sufficiently

01:04:30.680 strong that

01:04:31.920 YouTube had

01:04:32.500 to put a

01:04:32.860 warning on

01:04:33.360 it that

01:04:34.480 nothing was

01:04:35.400 found wrong

01:04:35.980 with the

01:04:36.300 election.

01:04:37.820 Now that's

01:04:38.500 what I

01:04:38.800 said as

01:04:39.160 well.

01:04:40.240 I said

01:04:40.960 directly,

01:04:41.640 I'm aware

01:04:42.140 of no

01:04:42.720 proof that

01:04:43.620 the election

01:04:44.040 was rigged.

01:04:45.440 It's just

01:04:46.140 that it's

01:04:46.780 designed in

01:04:47.440 a way

01:04:47.780 that

01:04:49.940 suggests

01:04:51.720 it's

01:04:54.620 possible.

01:04:56.540 Yeah.

01:04:57.320 You can

01:04:57.840 look at

01:04:58.160 even the

01:04:58.860 comments here

01:04:59.660 that the

01:04:59.860 people who

01:05:00.220 saw it

01:05:00.500 are saying

01:05:00.840 it's amazing,

01:05:01.480 warning for

01:05:06.060 hypotheticals.

01:05:07.100 I don't

01:05:07.280 know what

01:05:07.480 that means.

01:05:10.440 All right,

01:05:11.020 ladies and 0.98

01:05:11.440 gentlemen on

01:05:12.280 YouTube and

01:05:12.940 Rumble and

01:05:14.060 X, thanks for

01:05:14.840 joining.

01:05:15.200 I will see you

01:05:15.720 tomorrow, same

01:05:16.420 time.

01:05:17.540 Have a great

01:05:18.440 day.

01:05:19.260 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 21, 2024

Episode 2481 CWSA 05⧸21⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript