This week, Scott Adams talks about a new kind of computer, AI, Elon Musk's deal with the government, and the future of climate change. Plus, a new invention that could change the way we think about climate change, and more.
00:00:33.980Well, if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can understand with their tiny, human, smooth brains,
00:00:42.340all you need for that is a cup or mug or glass or tank of gel, stein, a canteen, a jug or flask, a vessel, but in kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:41.800You can see that I designed it with AI.
00:01:44.000So the first panel of the Dilbert comic, I used AI to tell me some interesting camera angles or perspectives for a guy on his computer when a dog walks into the room.
00:01:56.360Now, AI can't produce my characters because it'll complain about copyright and stuff, but it can give me a generic guy and a generic dog.
00:02:05.640And then when I have the angle of all the furniture, I just replace them with my characters.
00:03:14.060There's a gigantic Wall Street Journal says there's a huge cost saving technology for making solar panels.
00:03:22.480Now, you've heard this story a billion times, but this one sounds pretty promising.
00:03:27.140I didn't realize that China can make solar panels at roughly half the price of an American manufacturer.
00:03:35.780But with this new technology, it should close that gap a lot.
00:03:39.980And apparently it's not just theoretical.
00:03:42.180It looks like it's ready to put into the system.
00:03:46.240Yeah, I won't get into the technical details, but it reduces the amount of silver they need and makes something thinner than before and would reduce the cost substantially.
00:03:56.820And I ask you again, which one of the climate models takes into account technical innovations that totally change the curve?
00:05:24.940There's a Swiss startup that has made a computer and a brain organoids.
00:05:30.640Now, I don't know what an organoid is, but I'm going to guess it's something like an artificial brain that they built in a Petri dish or a tube or something.
00:05:39.620So I don't think it came from a human, I hope.
00:05:44.240You know, maybe the cells did or something.
00:05:46.240But they now have, in the real world, apparently you can connect to this thing if you're paying them.
00:05:55.440And it consumes a million times less power than regular digital processors.
00:06:20.100There's human brain parts that they've somehow connected to a digital interface, and they use the human brain part to do the calculating at one million times less power than regular stuff.
00:06:36.060Do you think there's any way that if it works and it can be reproduced, that it does work as though it's already up and running?
00:06:45.320So if it can be reproduced at a scale, who in the world is going to pay for regular computing when you can have computing at a million times less power?
00:06:55.140We are building a human brain slash cyborg, the Borg, I don't know.
00:07:05.040It's super cool, but also super whoa, because you don't know what could go wrong.
00:08:06.540The jurors, if they read the news, you want them to stick to just the trial data.
00:08:10.120And I'm starting to think that the astronauts for the Boeing Starliner, maybe they should have been sequestered for the last month to maybe not see any news about Boeing's quality control lately.
00:08:27.860So I worry that the reason it's delayed is that the astronauts were watching the news and said, I think I've got a cold or something.
00:09:32.720Now, besides the fact that these countries have half the cost, and presumably they're building up some infrastructure so they can be serious competitors to China.
00:09:43.580But I also haven't heard about Mexico.
00:09:46.460I don't know what the cost of labor is in Mexico compared to China.
00:09:50.460And I also don't know what's going to happen with robots.
00:09:53.940Because if we're making these much cheaper solar panels, and then we get rid of the labor,
00:10:05.820So you use a manufacturing process that drops the price by, I don't know, half.
00:10:10.720And then you put in robots that take another 25% off the price, or something like that.
00:10:15.900I'll tell you that if there's a way to invest in solar, I'm not recommending you invest in it, because I don't make recommendations for investments.
00:10:28.860But it does seem like maybe there's something that's going to happen here that can be gigantic.
00:10:34.680You don't really think of robots influencing energy, except to use it.
00:10:41.820But they're going to be building the solar panels, and the solar plants, and the solar everything, and probably the nuclear power plants, too, soon.
00:11:34.980So because I've met him in person, and he was very generous to me, I'll say that he's having an emotional reaction that we don't quite understand.
00:12:02.100Whatever is going on, his staff seems to have witnessed as well.
00:12:06.160So I don't know who these feds were or what exactly they were trying to do, except that it's in the context of everybody who is pro-Trump getting a hit.
00:12:15.660So I don't know what's going on, but keep an eye on it.
00:12:21.820He may need some help in any variety of ways.
00:12:26.140We don't know what the problem is, but he's clearly in a crisis situation.
00:12:29.660And so if you have any interest in either his operation or him as a human being, have a little bit of empathy and keep an eye on that.
00:12:44.480Maybe this way he can help one way or another.
00:13:10.080So apparently they're having an election.
00:13:12.720The sitting president can't run again.
00:13:14.820They have one-term president, six years.
00:13:19.000And the mentor, somebody who's worked closely with the current president, so he's recommending her, and that's the reason she's getting her push.
00:13:28.200Claudia Scheinbaum, a Jewish woman with a Ph.D. in energy engineering.
00:13:35.200That's about as perfect as you can get, isn't it?
00:13:37.800How would you like to be the president of Mexico?
00:13:42.520You're coming in with a Ph.D. in energy engineering, but it gets better.
00:17:15.400That the person who is mocking me, you don't fucking know.
00:17:19.060No, you're an idiot who thinks you know the expenses of technologies you've never been involved with because you read a fucking article somewhere.
00:17:30.160I'm smart enough to know that I don't know what will be the competing cost structures 20 years from now, which is what you have to think about, right?
00:17:56.260If you think you know it, dear troll commenter, well, you're the smartest person in the world, according to you, because you know what can't be known.
00:19:22.280Tucker Carlson's being really outspoken on his video recently said nothing is ever about our safety and that all the big political stuff is, you know, clearly about the interests of the people in power.
00:19:39.900He said this country and the world only changes when we eliminate the CIA.
00:19:44.840It'll take someone willing to be assassinated.
00:20:28.740But he's saying directly that the CIA has to be canceled completely.
00:20:35.340I saw an ex-CIA operative, agent, whatever you want to call him, also on Tucker's show, saying that when Trump was the president, he didn't use the CIA as much as he used private intelligence people to tell them what was going on.
00:20:54.520Why would you pay somebody to do the job of the CIA when the CIA is already being paid, and therefore it's free, you know, on an incremental basis?
00:21:09.140I can only think of one reason, that the president of the United States did not think that the CIA was on the same side as he was.
00:21:17.940In other words, Trump, the person who knew the most about the CIA while in office, had the most access, didn't believe that he could trust them with the security of the United States.
00:21:32.880You have to eliminate them under that situation.
00:21:35.500If a sitting president doesn't think they're even on the same side, not even on the same side, you can't live with that.
00:21:47.740So if you can buy these services on the open market and you don't trust the ones in the government, there is an argument for eliminating the CIA.
00:22:17.640You know, there was a time when the CIA was, you know, overthrowing governments and doing all kinds of things to help America control the world.
00:22:26.900And you could have, at that time, said, I don't like America doing all these other things in other countries, so I don't like the CIA.
00:22:36.200But there would have been a good argument to keep them.
00:22:39.700Because the, let me make the Machiavellian power argument here.
00:22:44.960Wouldn't it be nice if the United States left all the other countries alone and left them to pursue their best interests for their people until they become thriving democracies and the allies of us in the future, once they have used their own free will and their own resources to become an independent country that could be like a strong ally for us?
00:27:05.080As you know, the Biden campaign is built entirely on hoaxes, from the fine people hoax to the Trump tear-gassed peaceful protesters hoax and lots more drinking bleach.
00:27:17.700And the Biden-Harris headquarters, the X account, said, four years ago today, Trump tear-gassed peaceful protesters outside the White House.
00:27:32.480Well, it took about a minute before Joel Pollack fact-checked them hard.
00:28:58.600And the system moves people around like little chess players, and there aren't enough chess players for what they need to do.
00:29:08.980So they meet their diversity targets, whether they have qualified candidates or not, because humans always meet the targets that they're measured on and their performance is judged upon.
00:29:19.800And that's a big thing they're judged on.
00:29:23.100So if you assume that DEI as a system is guaranteed to fail because the pipeline of qualified people would be smaller than the demand, forcing them to take lesser and lesser qualified people just to meet their diversity goals.
00:29:40.660And if you assume that Democrats don't have an option, they have to be diverse.
00:29:46.980So they're forced to be diverse, but they're demonstrating to the rest of the world through what I would consider the most incompetent administration of all time and the most incompetent campaign and the most incompetent spokesperson.
00:30:02.980And all of those things are permeated with DEI hires, which if they were qualified to do their jobs, you would see a better job.
00:30:13.580I'm not talking about one thing that I'm criticizing that did.
00:30:16.980There's a pervasive incompetence in the current government like we've never really seen before.
00:30:23.820And the campaign is so obviously incompetent and they're so obviously backing the wrong guy that this is sort of a...
00:30:34.560The Biden campaign is basically your canary in the coal mine for every corporation, right?
00:30:41.540They just got to diversity faster because they're so public, they really had to.
00:30:47.200Companies are also trying to go as fast as they can, but you can see what happens when you get to DEI diversity goals when you have a limited pipeline of qualified people.
00:31:01.460Again, because of systemic racism at the school level, just not producing enough diverse candidates.
00:31:08.900So, yeah, the hoax campaign and the DEI incompetence should bring down the whole house in a few months.
00:31:21.040I'm expecting a complete demolition of the Biden campaign.
00:31:27.680I think we're close to the point where the whole thing's just going to come off the rails in a way we've never seen before.
00:31:38.740I was watching a body language expert look at the two faces of Biden because that's sort of becoming a thing.
00:31:45.440And the one face is his angry troll face that looks like a cat's asshole all puckered up.
00:31:54.180You know, you know, like, ooh, his face is all squeezed like all of his face meets his nose, you know, one little puckered place.
00:32:03.660And then you see his wide-eyed open vessel.
00:32:06.720So he's got the demon look where he looks demon-possessed.
00:32:09.840And then in the same talk sometimes, he'll have the empty vessel where his eyes are wide open and his mouth is forming that Hillary Clinton looking at balloons dropping.
00:32:23.220And you say to yourself, how in the world is that the same person?
00:32:30.960I love the fact that he's clearly two different people.
00:32:34.640I mean, I think it's the same organic person, but there's something that causes him to be a different personality, so much so he doesn't even look the same, not even a little bit.
00:32:45.360I mean, you can generally recognize it's Biden, but you'd think it's a different person if they stood next to each other.
00:33:00.480One is some kind of a deep fake thing, but I don't think so.
00:33:04.640And one is maybe there's something about editing.
00:33:08.180For example, you've seen all the quick edits they've done on his videos.
00:33:13.160Could it be that they have to take so much time off between edits that he takes a nap and just recovers and he wakes up and his eyes are open and he's the morning version?
00:33:26.440Could it be that we're seeing morning Joe?
00:33:30.960Could it be that when we see morning Joe, he's a little bit more lucid and that when we see, you know, evening Joe, that he's declined into his dementia, yelling, puckered face?
00:34:10.260I mean, I'm being told often and reliably by all the polls that people have decided that since Trump got convicted by an unfair trial, that therefore they're not going to vote for him.
00:34:23.820So we're all waiting to see the person, right?
00:34:28.200You know where I think that person is?
00:34:31.460I don't know, but I think the imaginary Republican who's not going to vote for Trump because of lawfare could be hanging out and partying with the black American voter who didn't know how to get an ID.
00:34:43.940I think they're together because we can't find either one of them and I think maybe they're helping each other hide.
00:34:52.780So somewhere, maybe in cabins, possibly, possibly in the mountains where the mega supremacists are gathering their imaginary armies.
00:35:01.960So it could be that the imaginary mega supremacist armies that are in the hills are creating a sanctuary for the imaginary Republicans who say they won't vote for Trump, but maybe also I'd like to say that they're diverse and that they've included the black Americans who want to vote and know enough about the world that they think voting makes sense, yet can't figure out how to get an ID.
00:36:24.380When you have $35 trillion in debt, whatever it is that you're spending is imaginary.
00:36:33.360Because whoever lent it to you, they ain't getting it back.
00:36:37.540So we've got an imaginary economy, imaginary data.
00:36:44.620We've got real problems that they imagine are not.
00:36:48.200They've got an imaginary Trump who's in their imagination, tried to take over on January 6th, and they imagine that he would do it again, even though he never did it.
00:37:00.360They think he'll do again the thing he never did once.
00:37:04.060So we have imaginary policies, imaginary people, imaginary Trump in the future, imaginary data.
00:38:11.740I think the Democrats sort of tiptoed into the imaginary world, and it worked.
00:38:18.160Because they can control the press, for at least their base, they can tell them literally anything.
00:38:27.100And once they realize that you can tell them anything, and the actual reality won't make any difference, because they also control the fact-checkers,
00:38:35.080they realize that going fully imaginary is a better strategy.
00:38:40.500And I agree, by the way, it's a better strategy, because they don't have anything of substance.
00:39:23.080The imaginary reason is that Putin's going to roll up Russia, or that Putin's going to roll up Europe if he gets Ukraine.
00:39:29.920You know, with no regard to the fact that some of us know the history of Ukraine, and that, as Mike Benz can explain better, that the whole thing looks like an energy play between two criminal organizations.
00:39:43.180One United States and the other Russia.
00:39:45.740And basically, it's like we're stealing their drug stash so we can sell it ourselves, their energy.
00:42:20.260Are you telling me that all the times that people have been ripping on Elvin Bragg, nobody thought to mock him for having a degree from Harvard?
00:42:47.660So, maybe he went to Harvard back when it made a difference what your credentials were.
00:42:52.540If he had just graduated from Harvard, I would be saying, you know, D, I, higher, because, you know, Harvard's become ridiculous about their standards.
00:43:04.880But maybe when he was there, it was closer to, you know, he belonged there.
00:43:10.280I'm not going to say he didn't belong in Harvard, because there was a time when Harvard was at least a little bit credible.
00:43:16.020But according to my digital creature from Amazon, whose name I don't want to say out loud, because I'll trigger it, he has a net worth of $41 million.
00:44:48.620That was from the Gateway Pundit, they're reporting.
00:44:54.700Also, Gateway Pundit is saying that there's some poll of Arab American voters, and Biden is way off in his popularity.
00:45:05.360He had a 60% Arab American vote in 2020, but he's down to about 20% support.
00:45:12.020Now, I don't think the Arab American community is big enough that it's going to move the election, but wow.
00:45:20.560I think it's one more sign of complete collapse.
00:45:24.440I don't think we realize how close the Democrat Party is to total collapse, because until it happens, it doesn't look like it's going to happen.
00:45:34.140Nothing happens until something happens.
00:45:36.220So, I feel like the major tentpole holding up the Democrats is really creaky right now, and if that one cracks, the rest go.
00:45:48.140Do you know what the tentpole is that holds up the entire Democrat Party?
00:45:55.400If the fine people hoax can be debunked so that Democrats can see it in a way that's credible, that takes everything away.
00:46:08.080And the fact that the Republicans don't go after that, basically just people like me, pundits do, I never really understood that.
00:46:16.100Anyway, Tim Poole abruptly cut his own live stream, because he had Laura Loomer as a guest, and Laura Loomer was talking about getting back at Democrats, and that there's enough crimes there that if Trump got back in office, there would be a number of people who should be dealt with with the legal process.
00:46:41.420However, I think her rhetoric reached a point where Tim Poole's entire show was probably at risk if he didn't pull it down himself.
00:46:56.060So, I'm going to give Tim Poole a big, a big compliment.
00:47:06.040So, I'll tell you in softer words what Laura Loomer said so that I also don't get canceled, right?
00:47:13.540So, Laura Loomer said that the level of the criminal behavior, consistent with the laws on the books for treason, might go to the level of the death penalty.
00:47:31.960If you were to say, hey, people might be guilty of certain crimes, here's why we think they are, the penalty for that could be the death penalty, it should be on the table, that's okay, because you're just talking about the law.
00:47:47.060Here's what I think is too far, and let's see if you would have spotted it, because Tim Poole did, so he's good at this, right?
00:47:54.980If you say, let's get a list of names of people, and then before you've tried them, you say, we want to kill these people, then you sort of become Alvin Bragg yourself.
00:48:11.600You don't want to start with a person, and then talk about the death penalty, unless you've really had a lot of conversations in a court case that's, you know, credible about those charges.
00:48:25.460But it's real dangerous to go full Fonnie Willis, or who was it, Letitia James, and say you're running for office to get Trump.
00:48:37.940Somehow she's not paying for that, but it's way too far.
00:48:41.140So Tim Poole, I think very smartly and very decisively, said, oh, shoot, she just gave YouTube a predicate to cancel my whole channel, and I'm not going to die on this hill.
00:49:07.180Because the information still gets out, you know, the social media picks it up, but he reduces his risk on YouTube, and he lives to fight again.
00:49:46.160Jonathan Turley, still, you know, national treasure, talking about any of the legal elements of politics.
00:49:55.480So, he talks about the fact that, you know, the whole situation where the government or the Republicans are trying to get a hold of the audio that they only have the transcript of, of Biden doing his testimony to her, it's UR.
00:50:13.720And, of course, the Democrats say, hey, you have the transcript, that's good enough.
00:50:19.900And then the Republicans say, yeah, but we don't trust the transcript.
00:50:25.460We think he might have edited it, and it might be way worse than the transcript shows.
00:50:30.760And we have a right to know, because if Biden is not capable, it's got to be a 25th Amendment situation.
00:50:39.040So, they definitely have a right to know.
00:50:41.900I completely support their attempt to get that.
00:50:45.760But listen to, according to Turley, the Justice Department is making a new claim for why they can't release the audio of something they've already released the transcript to.
00:50:59.180Can you think of any reason why you wouldn't release the audio when they've willingly and already and publicly and everybody's seen it, the transcript?
00:51:07.420What reason could there be other than it sounds really terrible, like really bad?
00:51:38.380The passage of time and advancements in audio, artificial intelligence, and deep fake technologies only amplify concerns about malicious manipulation of audio files.
00:51:52.100Wouldn't that apply to everything that anybody has on audio?
00:51:58.540I feel like that is such a stretch, such a stretch, that it's almost just laughable.
00:52:42.900Now you can see how the deep fake changed it.
00:52:45.160But since the only public thing we'd have is an audio that nobody listens to, if somebody were to take a clip out of it and do a 10-second clip where it sounds like he said the N-word or something ridiculous, then I think people would believe it.
00:53:02.180I do, because if the headline story said the audio tape is out, and then you saw a clip, and then you played it, and you heard what you thought was Biden's voice, and he sounded really dementia-ridden and crazy and, you know, saying racist stuff and whatever, you might believe it.
00:53:22.080And we're close enough to the election where a fake audio tape could actually change things.
00:53:29.520Remember, the audio tape of Trump saying, grab them by the pussy?
00:53:34.220People thought that was going to change the election.
00:53:38.420But is it a realistic risk that when you're this close to an election, and it's the president who's running for re-election, and it's audio only, it is actually an unusually big risk?
00:54:30.340It's not crazy that it opens the door to a bad thing happening.
00:54:35.140But let me suggest this, and I think the people asking for it will say the same thing.
00:54:42.040We already have the transcript, and we already have a zillion hours of Biden talking on audio in other places.
00:54:50.560AI doesn't need the specific audio from the event.
00:54:53.560All you have to do is run the transcript through it on a voice that's trained as Biden, and then if that works, you go back in and you edit the transcript and feed it back into AI again.
00:55:06.140So instead of saying the real transcript in Biden's voice, it adds N-word or some crazy thing.
00:55:13.380So I feel as if maybe the lawyers making this ask don't understand how AI works.
00:55:22.540Do they not understand that whether we have the transcript or not, whether we have the audio or not, it actually doesn't have any effect on whether somebody would make a deepfake?
00:55:55.100See, the trouble with fakes is that they do their damage before they're debunked, and the debunk never gets the attention of the original.
00:56:04.480So there's nothing that you couldn't do right now to fake that.
00:56:08.900Searchlight Pictures presents The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.
00:56:15.720From the director of Meet the Parents and the writer of Poor Things, comes The Roses, starring Academy Award winner Olivia Colman, Academy Award nominee Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon, and Allison Janney.
00:56:28.600A hilarious new comedy filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of hatred, proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses.
00:56:36.160See The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.
00:57:17.880The men there were very clearly, by their reaction, saying, outlaw, you just made him better.
00:57:25.140There's almost nothing you could have done to Trump that would have been as good for his brand than becoming an outlaw to the crooked government.
00:57:42.400My honest opinion, without the spin, it's the spin season, so even I, as much as I try to avoid spinning, everybody's going to do it this season.
00:57:54.500But honestly, like in my body and my real mind, no spin, I just love that he's an outlaw.
00:58:03.920Because the way he got there, you know, if he'd robbed the bank, I'd say no.
00:58:29.920After UFC fighter Kevin Holland won, he jumped over the ring and went right to President Trump, former President Trump, and shook his hands and said some private words to him in support, obviously.
00:58:43.840Trump slapped him on the shoulders, and obviously they're now friends.
00:58:48.040You should know that UFC fighter Kevin Holland is black.
00:59:30.220I'll be donating to you is the key phrase.
00:59:33.500By the way, I don't know if you have the current data, but in the 48 hours after the felony conviction verdict, Trump had already earned $1.6 million per felony.
00:59:53.860And if you do the math, you know, people say he's not really a good business person, but by my calculations, he invested $130,000, and he got a return of $53 million.
01:00:50.180Trump also at the UFC announced that he's getting on TikTok.
01:00:55.300Now, you might know that I think that TikTok needs to be canceled or divested into the U.S., but as long as it's there, I guess I got to agree with Vivek and with Trump.
01:01:09.980If it's there, and it matters, and it's a big way to reach voters, sure, why not?
01:02:20.840So she recorded it as a lawyer expense.
01:02:25.960But really, no matter what she was thinking, because as Megyn Kelly explained on her video the other day, that it doesn't matter what anybody was thinking when they did the expense.
01:02:38.920It only matters that a reasonable person could look at it and say, well, there's more than one reason you would do that.
01:02:45.380So when Trump did his payments, it didn't matter that he was thinking it was mostly about the election.
01:02:58.000It had more to do with the fact that a reasonable person would say, well, there's more than one reason you would want that information not to get out.
01:03:04.420You know, one's your family, one's your business reputation, and the other is political.
01:03:09.140So if everybody agrees that there are three reasons, that should have been reason enough that he can't be convicted.
01:03:16.320If there's three, it's just sort of automatically you're not guilty.
01:03:23.340So Hillary obviously was putting this into legal expenses to hide her contribution to the hoax, of course.
01:03:36.020Moreover, says Sachs, Hillary's campaign was headquartered in New York State, huh, and in Brooklyn, New York, which would make it fall under the jurisdiction of New York Penal Law 175.1, the state law, which makes it a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal the commission of a crime.
01:03:56.520Huh, I feel like that Steele dossier thing was a crime, wasn't it?
01:04:07.060I don't know, maybe it wasn't technically, but it should have been.
01:04:11.460And then the Sachs asks, was the key distinction between Hillary's campaign violation versus recent news?
01:04:21.140And he concludes with Hillary's violation, there wasn't a Manhattan prosecutor politically motivated to bring an unprecedented case to trial.
01:04:31.000Now, as you know, people who in the past may have leaned left in their politics, like Elon Musk, and I'm not sure where David Sachs was, but he's clearly on the anti-Biden train at the moment.
01:04:48.640So you see some people that you wouldn't expect to be anti-Biden, who are clearly anti-Biden, but let's look at the rest of them, because it's a growing thing, and I think the dam is about to burst.
01:05:03.060ABC News says this, and they post, like any other American found guilty of a crime, Donald Trump is likely to face new restrictions and lose a number of rights due to his newfound felon status.
01:05:34.540Why wouldn't you just say, now that he's a felon, or now that the jury has concluded he's a felon, why would you say that he was found guilty instead of guilty?
01:05:47.500Well, let me put the hypnotist filter on it.
01:05:51.520As a hypnotist, I was trained that people's choice of words reveals their thoughts.
01:06:04.160The choice of the words found guilty instead of just guilty.
01:06:07.800Now, I do understand that found guilty is a common phrase, and it wouldn't be surprising to see it used in other contexts.
01:06:14.740But where you have a choice, and they obviously had a choice of any words that would tell the story, why would you put found guilty?
01:06:23.960Because found guilty has the odor of, we know he's not really guilty, but it is true that he was found guilty.
01:06:32.740It suggests that the ABC News person who wrote that post doesn't believe that he was guilty because they're watching the same thing we watched, and that it was a lawfare.
01:07:53.720I mean, to me, it looks like they're trying.
01:07:55.800Because remember, also, Fareed Zakaria said directly that unless your name was Donald Trump, you never would have been charged with this crime.
01:08:59.780He said, so it's really which candidate can energize their base.
01:09:03.600In situations like this, it does energize Trump's base.
01:09:07.600I see Biden's base upset with him over a number of things.
01:09:10.420I do think a situation like this gives them something to fight for, meaning the Trumpers.
01:09:16.420Now, I saw somebody say that they thought that Samir Khanish's face and body language suggested that he was going to explode like he didn't like seeing it.
01:09:29.160I would suggest that you're reading him completely wrong.
01:09:33.840Samir Khanish knew exactly what Charlemagne was going to say.
01:09:37.420I mean, not exactly, but he knew what Charlemagne's message was.
01:11:21.100Now, I've taught you before that if one of the major networks, let's say CNN or MSNBC, say something is a fact, but then you go to the conservative outlets, let's say Breitbart or Fox News, and they say it's not a fact.
01:15:08.380So now CNN has made it safe for the least political person in all of public life to tell you that the former president of the United States is getting law fared right in front of you.
01:15:26.120Now, to you, this might seem like a small deal, but I don't think you quite understand how much persuasive influence Naval has on the smartest people in Silicon Valley.
01:15:44.620He is so respected that when he puts down a stake, and I would say that he put down a stake, that this is too far.
01:15:56.940To get him to talk about anything in the political domain and to make a direct statement about it, that's pretty direct, is extraordinary.
01:19:25.960Who would be the best pick to do that?
01:19:28.800Well, I would go with Juan Mershon, father military officer from Colombia, who once worked in their intelligence services, somehow made it to the United States as an immigrant and built quite a good life.
01:19:50.300So now I'm not going to make an allegation because I don't know anything about his father.
01:19:56.160But why does it look exactly like you would think it would look if the worst case scenario were true and that the whole thing is the CIA and it's all fixed?
01:20:16.100Can we write that off to coincidence that it looks exactly like a CIA operation?
01:20:21.340Now, again, I'm only making unfair inferences about people who are known to be the types of people who associate with other types of people.
01:20:30.600So that's a big, you know, I don't want to go further than that because that would be defamation.
01:20:36.800So I'm not going to make a claim that I know it's true.
01:20:46.260Why there's such a big coincidence involved, especially when we know that his selection was supposed to be random, but clearly wasn't because he got three Trump cases in a row.
01:21:02.540In the meantime, we hear the people who are part of the deep state saying that his merchant is going to recommend jail time, despite the fact that nobody would get jail time for this if they were not Trump.
01:21:19.520And the argument was because Trump was sort of had a bad attitude and violated the gag order.
01:21:27.480So therefore, they would send him to jail.
01:22:25.120And the reason I say that is that we live through Epstein.
01:22:30.760If there had never been an Epstein, if there had never been a Kennedy who got assassinated, if we didn't see that RFK Jr. also doesn't get secret service protection for no good reason, I would have said, okay, our government doesn't do things like that.
01:22:47.020But clearly, they do things like that.
01:22:50.800So, yes, they have an existential risk, well, to their jobs, if Trump becomes the president again.
01:22:58.340And what would they do if they are the dirty tricks group of the country?
01:23:03.060The people who are selected by their willingness to break rules.
01:23:06.800The CIA is selected by their willingness to do illegal things.
01:23:13.520At least the operators are, because they're doing illegal things in other countries.
01:23:19.820You could argue that it's still legal in our country if they do illegal things and it's authorized by our country.
01:23:35.000And that we would assume that they wouldn't do super illegal things when it's the very group that's been selected because they like to do, or at least they're willing to do, super illegal things.
01:24:08.680To me, it looks like the court case is driven by the same people who are, apparently, if you look at it on the surface, on the surface, it looks exactly like a murder plot with a statistical element.
01:24:22.160Which is, maybe they don't know for sure, he'll be killed in prison, but they think there's a good chance.
01:25:51.020And Trump was charged and convicted by the state.
01:25:55.780However, the state's charges depended entirely upon the fact that there were also federal violations per their case.
01:26:05.020So if you were to pardon Trump from the federal part of it, it would make the state part of it dissolve because the state part of it depended on the federal part.
01:26:17.120So even though the federal part was not really what the state found, they still relied on the jury thinking a federal thing had been violated so that they could apply the state thing to the higher level crime of felony because it supported the other charge or vice versa.
01:28:33.980I asked, why is it that Soros is doing what he's doing?
01:28:37.060And I wanted other people to explain it to me like I'm an idiot so I could understand why Soros would be funding so many things that seem like disastrous for the country that he lives in.
01:28:50.300Why would you destroy the country that you live in?
01:28:55.380Now, I'm being called naive and uninformed.
01:29:00.320And here's what I heard from a user online that Soros supports anarcho-tyranny, all the things we're seeing in the country, because he believes.
01:29:13.120Because he believes in a globalist agenda that transcends national borders, and it wouldn't matter that he's a citizen of the United States, because Soros' preference would be that states go away and he'll do fine because he's rich.
01:29:42.380It's the only one you should listen to, because Soros is rich.
01:29:47.920If you're not hearing the opinion from somebody also rich, I mean, I don't have anything like his money, but I've experienced going from poor to being wealthy.
01:30:13.200If you're at the top, the last thing you want in a risk-reward world, the last thing you want is to change the whole system that you're dominating at at the top.
01:30:26.780That introduces a risk of total collapse that would take him from the top to not the top.
01:30:34.820It could make every dollar he owns worth nothing.
01:31:18.960If you've never experienced going from uncertainty and economic low income to a place where you would call yourself wealthy, when you get there, the last thing you want to do is change the whole world into something you don't even know what will happen.
01:31:37.600Nobody does that, and among the group of the nobodies who would do that, the top, top, top, the very number one person who wouldn't do that is the person who's famous for being good at risk analysis.
01:32:22.520If a globalist one world government were to be formed, have you thought through who would be in charge?
01:32:31.840Have you lived in the real world at all?
01:32:35.240If you form a real world government of the top richest people, like actually an official government, they would just fight with each other.
01:32:44.800It would be like the Democrats and the Republicans.
01:32:48.620They would be buying the fight of all fights when none of them need a fight.
01:32:53.240All the billionaires are already the champions of the world.
01:36:07.220Anyway, it looks like the Russians are trying to take out their vital services and depopulate it before they do anything bigger.
01:36:14.880So it looks like the current method of taking over a city in a military way is the American and Israeli version is a little more boots on the ground.
01:36:27.000The Russian version is, we'll go in when there's nothing left.