Episode 2496 CWSA 06⧸05⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 19 minutes
Words per Minute
148.1726
Summary
If you were watching the Dilbert comic, you would see an interesting thing. The comic from 10 years ago, this week, could have been written today. And an AI chatbot that will artificially age itself into the future, so you can have a conversation with yourself in the future.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
time. If you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with
00:00:06.420
their tiny human brains, smooth and tiny and dumb as they are. But if you'd like to be better than
00:00:14.800
that, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or gels, a cyanocantean jug or flask,
00:00:19.280
a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the
00:00:25.360
unparalleled pleasure. I don't mean at the end of the day the thing that makes everything better
00:00:29.300
today with a little bit of oxytocin thrown in for free. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. Sip.
00:00:42.740
I feel like I totally Joe Biden that simultaneous sip.
00:00:47.020
I'd like to read the simultaneous sip in the character of Joe Biden.
00:01:01.920
Tigard, Tigard, Trump's making my candy too small.
00:01:09.580
I think that's how it sounds. Anyway, if you were watching the Dilbert comic,
00:01:17.020
you would see an interesting thing. If you subscribe to the Dilbert comic, either on X or on Locals,
00:01:25.500
you also get the digital Dilbert calendar. There's only a digital one this year. And
00:01:32.480
you would see the 10 years from current date. So I'm running the calendar or 10 years ago comics.
00:01:39.500
The comic from 10 years ago this week could have been written today. 10 years ago, I was writing
00:01:48.180
about the robots taking over Dilbert's job and using their advanced intelligence. And it would look like
00:01:57.540
it was written today. It would look exactly like today. It was weird. All right. In the category of
00:02:03.700
science, you could have totally skipped and just asked Scott and saved a lot of money.
00:02:09.640
Scott, we're considering doing this large double blind experiment.
00:02:16.020
But before we spend millions of dollars and years doing it, maybe we should just ask you
00:02:21.900
and save all that money. See, here's one of those ones where they could have done that.
00:02:26.620
They did a study and they found that the internet alters brain chemistry in young people and might
00:02:34.200
make them addicted. Yeah. Yeah. It's 2024. And we're just discovering that the internet's kind of
00:02:45.620
addictive. I feel like you could have saved a lot of money on this one. Do you know how I knew
00:02:53.160
the internet is addictive and video games are addictive and that kind of stuff? I've seen
00:02:59.600
a minor playing a video game. Have you ever seen a young boy playing a video game?
00:03:07.240
What's it look like to you? What the hell does it look like to you? If that's not addiction,
00:03:13.240
I don't know what is, for God's sakes. Yeah, that's a little obvious.
00:03:17.420
Here's another one you could have asked me about. Scientists at MIT are building this AI chatbot
00:03:26.940
that will be a version of you that they will artificially age into the future so that you
00:03:33.360
can actually have a conversation with yourself in the future, like you're self-retired. And you can
00:03:39.400
say things like, all right, so you were a teacher for 30 years. Let's say that's what you wanted to
00:03:45.660
become. How did it work out? And then the chatbot will say stuff like, well, you're very rewarding.
00:03:52.280
You maybe tell you it didn't make as much money as you could have, but the benefits are good,
00:03:56.760
that sort of thing. Well, the reason you could have asked me is because this science was done
00:04:02.980
maybe 20 years ago. I remember talking about it 20 years ago. If they artificially, this is before AI,
00:04:09.800
but they artificially used CGI, I think, to age you. And all you had to do is look at yourself as an
00:04:17.880
old person. And then they would ask you how much you're saving in your retirement accounts.
00:04:23.420
And the people who saw a photo of themselves old saved more money because now their future old self
00:04:30.960
looked like a real person. They had a visual representation. So yes, I believe that talking
00:04:37.960
to your future self as your advisor might be the very best way to improve your life in the future.
00:04:44.660
It's not there yet. But imagine if you got advice from you, the more mature version of yourself.
00:04:52.540
Who are you going to trust more than you that has more experience than you? The only thing that
00:04:59.440
would be better than me is me with a little more experience, says every person in the world.
00:05:05.420
All right. So that's exciting. Actually, that could be a pretty big deal.
00:05:12.180
So Senator Joni Ernst, I think she's the one. I didn't write it down by memory. I think she's
00:05:17.640
the one who was caught on the hot mic. Give me a fact check if I got the wrong senator. But as she
00:05:22.920
was walking away and her microphone was still on, she mumbled, I don't trust anyone whose uncle was
00:05:28.680
eaten by cannibals. Now, that's a good joke. I immediately said, wait, I'm going to have to look
00:05:40.900
into this Joni Ernst because suddenly she's a little smarter than I thought. It's actually hard
00:05:47.400
to tell a funny joke. You know, one that you haven't heard before that's not just being copied.
00:05:52.740
But what makes this work? I'll talk about it in terms of what makes a joke work. I don't trust
00:05:58.440
anyone whose uncle was eaten by cannibals. You get that it doesn't make sense, right?
00:06:04.580
Like it's not a logical statement, but that's why it's funny. It's funny because your brain tries to
00:06:10.860
make it make sense. Make it make sense. What does his uncle have to do with him?
00:06:15.020
But I suppose you could say that anybody who claims their uncle was eaten by cannibals
00:06:22.760
would be a stronger way to play it. But it's a funnier joke if you just say,
00:06:27.760
I don't trust anyone whose uncle was eaten by cannibals. The fact that it's just got that
00:06:32.340
little bit of illogic, there's nothing that connects the uncle to Biden, is what makes it funny because
00:06:38.400
your brain tries to make it make sense and it doesn't. And that's the model for a joke.
00:06:44.180
Now, could I teach this to AI? I could, but it still couldn't do it because it would have to
00:06:53.800
run through lots of examples and judge them and it can't judge them. Now, the first time I heard
00:06:59.840
this or let's say I thought this joke in my own head, it would have made me laugh as soon as I
00:07:06.220
thought of it. And then I would have known it was a funny joke. But AI can't do that because it can't
00:07:15.840
test it on its own brain before it tries it out. All right, I'm going to give you an NPC test.
00:07:24.180
Do you ever wonder if we're a simulation, if you're an NPC? Anybody ever wonder that?
00:07:29.600
Well, I'm going to find out right now. I'm going to read you a story. This is really in the news. It's
00:07:37.460
a real story. And then I will test your reactions and we'll spot some NPCs. I did this also on X. It's
00:07:44.660
a good experiment. Watch it. All right, here's the story. There's a company called Climeworks who has
00:07:51.980
found a way to vastly reduce the cost of sucking CO2 directly out of the air. A company is called,
00:08:00.120
yeah, Climeworks. They've already done this. They've sucked CO2 out of the air.
00:08:08.520
Come on. There we go. NPCs are weighing in. We caught a few.
00:08:15.240
Yeah, so they're taking the CO2 out of the air much more efficiently than they used to.
00:08:21.980
I think some of you are cheating. You saw the answer in my X post. Yeah. If you said trees
00:08:31.720
or CO2 is plant food, you're an NPC. Do you know why? Because it's the most obvious thing
00:08:42.040
to say in that situation. That's the tell. And I've been talking about this topic for years
00:08:50.640
and every time I do, somebody says, oh, you're telling me they invented trees?
00:08:58.240
Feeling pretty good about that one. They invented trees is what you're saying?
00:09:04.640
Or they say, Scott, if they take all the CO2 out of the air, don't you know that's plant food?
00:09:15.980
Now, I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying it's the most obvious thing to say.
00:09:22.840
So if you can't avoid saying the most obvious thing, you might be an NPC. That's all. That's all I'm saying.
00:09:30.360
So if you're not an NPC, but yet you fell into the trap of saying the most obvious thing,
00:09:38.240
don't do that anymore because it makes you look like an NPC. All right? I'm going to test you again.
00:09:46.260
I'm going to test you again. Somebody should invent a food that is an indistinct food that just has all
00:09:54.820
of your vitamins and minerals, and you could just eat it every day. You didn't have to worry about it
00:10:00.020
being, you know, all nutritionally complete because it would be all good. Say it. Say it. I know there's
00:10:09.420
an NPC here. Say soil and green. Say it. Yeah, that's an NPC trap. If you talk about a new food source
00:10:17.880
and somebody says, it's soil and green, NPC. If you talk about a good way to exercise and then somebody
00:10:28.580
in the comments says, swimming is the best form of exercise, that's an NPC because it's the most obvious
00:10:35.360
thing to say about every conversation about exercise. If you're talking about diet and fitness
00:10:43.780
and your contribution is, if you exercise more and eat fewer calories, you'll lose weight.
00:10:51.100
Well, you're either Matt Walsh or you're an NPC. Matt Walsh is doing it for entertainment,
00:10:57.120
so that's a different situation. He's making content out of it. All right. Here's some news that I was
00:11:06.000
worried about this for a while, and I find this reassuring. You ever see a news story where you've been
00:11:13.200
kind of anxious about this, but then you finally find out the truth, and it's just what you hoped it
00:11:18.760
would be, and then you can finally relax. Well, here's the truth. And thank God, Vivek continues to
00:11:25.980
be a national treasure because he's over in, he traveled to Italy, and he met with the Pope.
00:11:32.140
And Vivek confirms that the Pope, hold on, because you're going to feel good about this, the Pope is
00:11:42.740
opposed to war. He thinks Ukraine should be settled peacefully.
00:11:47.820
I don't know about you people, but that could have gone either way. And I'm, for one, I'm glad that the
00:12:00.480
Pope is opposed to war, because you never know. I mean, unless you check in with him once in a while,
00:12:07.220
how much trouble would it be if suddenly they thought, you know what, the more I think about
00:12:12.480
this, the more I'm liking war. So I guess we've got another reprieve. This Pope, this Pope is the good
00:12:20.740
kind, opposed to war. And thank you, Vivek, for going over there and confirming that for us, because up
00:12:28.760
until now, we were just guessing. Well, nothing entertains me more than watching the Washington Post die
00:12:36.720
from eating its own dog food. And what I mean by that is this. Somebody named Margaret Sullivan,
00:12:44.160
who I think is maybe a Democrat of some kind, maybe a writer, I'm not sure. She said, talking about the
00:12:51.940
Washington Post, she said, each of our three newsrooms, oh, I guess she writes for the Washington
00:12:56.060
Post. Each of our three newsrooms will be led by an outstanding white male, which we feel is especially
00:13:03.900
appropriate in Washington, D.C. Zing. If these three newsrooms are successful, we will consider
00:13:10.820
a fourth and a fifth. So how about my DEI and sarcasm, and I'll put them together.
00:13:19.280
And here's what I say about that. This is the kind of writing that made the Washington Post lose
00:13:26.800
$77 million just last year. Yeah, this is one of their best writers.
00:13:39.300
So because they've accepted the DEI philosophy, at least the employees, they insist that they want
00:13:50.200
more DEI. But management and ownership appears to have decided something opposite, as in, we can't lose
00:13:59.860
$77 million a year, and nobody's reading your stuff, so maybe we'll bring in some people who are very
00:14:06.940
experienced. But uh-oh, the experienced people were white. And the boss, the new boss, said directly
00:14:14.540
that, you know, well, I'm gonna, I'll paraphrase this. So this is not his words at all. But he basically
00:14:22.960
said, I don't have time to dick around, so I just brought people I know can do the work. I mean, again,
00:14:29.080
that's not his words, but that's what it was. He said, basically, I just don't have time to dick around,
00:14:34.700
so I got some people that I've worked with before that I know can do this.
00:14:37.940
Now, is that smart? Very smart. In fact, I can't even think of a smarter thing. Well, it would be
00:14:45.720
smarter than recruiting great people with a great track record. Well, the problem is, that works
00:14:53.120
everywhere except where there's a lot of DEI. So watching the DEI rip the culture apart after
00:15:01.560
the entities such as the news have been trying to push DEI on us, I like watching it destroy their
00:15:10.940
entire organization, because that's what's happening. There's an FDA advisory panel that
00:15:18.480
turned down an application for a specific psychedelic from a specific company that they
00:15:25.560
were going to do, Lycos Therapeutics. They wanted to use an MDMA-like substance and
00:15:31.560
well, actually MDMA. And they had some kind of a therapeutic process that would go with that,
00:15:38.600
and they applied, and the FDA said, no. 8 out of 10 said, nope, the risks outweigh the benefits.
00:15:47.960
Now, what's the first thing you think when you hear that an FDA advisory panel, now the FDA itself
00:15:54.640
hasn't voted. These are just the advisory panel. We expect it would go the same as the advisory panel,
00:15:59.960
because it was, you know, 8 to 2. But what's the first thing you think when you see the FDA might
00:16:09.000
turn down a MDMA-based therapy? Do you say to yourself, well, here's some honest people who
00:16:18.440
looked at the data and decided to protect us by keeping us away from this kind of a risk?
00:16:24.020
Is that what you think? Is that your first thought? Or is your first thought that some
00:16:28.880
number of these advisory panel people, they have to be experts in the field, right? What would be
00:16:35.880
the point of an advisory panel unless they were experts in this kind of stuff? Now, what would you
00:16:43.560
expect of an expert of this kind of stuff? Well, one thing I'd expect is if they ever wanted to make
00:16:50.840
big money, they have to work for a big pharmaceutical company. Do you think there are too many big
00:16:56.920
pharmaceutical companies who are super interested in seeing psychedelics destroy the biggest cash cow
00:17:03.580
they've ever had, which is anxiety and antidepressant drugs? So I asked myself, is there really any
00:17:12.060
possibility that the FDA is even structured in a way that they could possibly approve something that's
00:17:19.340
insanely good for the country? And you might not even need a professional to help you with it.
00:17:26.320
Now, ideally, you wouldn't want to do any psychedelics without, you know, some kind of
00:17:31.240
professional guidance and, you know, quality control and all that. But people will. I mean,
00:17:37.720
in the real world, they'll take some mushrooms and see what happens. So I've got a feeling that the
00:17:43.700
FDA as structured is not the entity we should ever trust for something that would reduce our costs by
00:17:50.700
100%, basically, cost of treatment, and also would fix you almost immediately, according to many,
00:17:59.880
many reports. So I don't know. I'd love to think the advisors got it right. But we live in such a zero
00:18:07.880
trust environment that I just automatically assume they didn't get it right. Do you have the same
00:18:12.940
reaction? My working assumption is it's crooked. Do you have the same? I have no evidence. It's just
00:18:21.620
a working assumption. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.
00:18:29.100
Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming
00:18:34.220
experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting,
00:18:39.040
signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive
00:18:43.980
library of the best slots and top-tier table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable
00:18:49.720
promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget
00:18:55.560
Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to
00:19:01.200
feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for
00:19:06.180
less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino? Gambling problem? Call
00:19:11.920
ConnexOntario 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility
00:19:18.820
restrictions apply. See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:19:23.520
Well, meanwhile, the EU Commission, they're looking at expanding their surveillance of their
00:19:33.080
population into digital devices. So they would maybe authorize the government to listen into your
00:19:39.600
digital devices. I assume we're already there. Is there anybody who thinks their digital devices are
00:19:47.160
not listening to them? You know, you know, the people who don't want to have a, let's say, an
00:19:54.720
Amazon or a Google or an Apple digital device is because they're afraid it will listen to them in
00:20:00.260
their private time. How many of those people also have a smartphone sitting on the table next to them
00:20:05.800
at the whole time they're saying, oh, I sure wouldn't want to talk into that digital device over
00:20:11.040
there while you've got your smartphone in your hand? If the government wants to hear your stuff,
00:20:18.620
can't they get into your phone just as easily as they can get into your digital device?
00:20:23.640
I feel like it's only a question of whether they want to get your stuff. If they want to get all
00:20:30.780
your communications and also listen into what you're doing at the moment, I think they can do
00:20:36.080
that to everybody all the time. I don't think having a digital device would make really any
00:20:41.500
difference at all because when are you away from your phone? How often do you spend near a digital
00:20:47.440
device but not your phone? Not very much. Anyway, the X platform, Elon Musk's X platform is maybe going to
00:20:59.460
do some video product that's kind of like TikTok and Instagram Reels and there's a TV app coming too.
00:21:07.240
So sure enough, the X platform is going to be the everything platform. And Musk would be crazy
00:21:13.160
if he didn't do Reels and TikTok things because, you know, American TikTok might go away or it might get
00:21:19.680
divested and be with a competitor to X. Yeah, all the existing companies should be trying to chip away
00:21:28.200
if that TikTok business could be big. I heard also that maybe there was a rule change on X that would
00:21:35.620
allow more adult content so long as children couldn't see it. And I feel like that might be related to the
00:21:46.000
Reels because, you know, the Reels have this way, even if you have rules against what kind of content
00:21:52.660
can be there. They have all kinds of ways to beat it. Have you seen on Instagram, for example, you're not allowed to do
00:22:00.020
full nudity. But have you seen the workarounds to the full nudity? They do skimpy wet t-shirts that I suppose
00:22:11.520
technically would show you clothed, but, you know, leaving nothing to the imagination. The other thing they do is they
00:22:18.800
flash you so that you have to try to catch it out of a screenshot. So it'll be some Instagram influencer
00:22:25.820
just, you know, lifts up her top. I guess the algorithm can't catch it. So everybody's always looking to cheat.
00:22:34.780
So it does seem to me if Musk is going to go big on video, you know, these short video loops,
00:22:41.040
it's going to attract that kind of business. And you might as well adjust your rules
00:22:46.980
because you're not going to stop it. So that's the way I do it.
00:22:57.560
who I really worry about him because he says stuff that just sounds like he's crazy.
00:23:02.340
I mean, he's presenting himself like, I don't know, like he's stupid, but that couldn't be the case.
00:23:07.440
So I wonder if there's something else going on. But he was on CNBC and just called the,
00:23:13.220
he called the podcasters of the All In Pod mega extremists.
00:23:19.460
How could he possibly even be familiar with the podcast or those personalities?
00:23:24.740
You know, the All In Podcast, David Sachs and Chamath and a couple other buddies whose name I keep
00:23:31.240
forgetting. Sorry about that. I only remember the two. Anyway, the All In Pod are people who I
00:23:42.520
imagine might have voted Democrat in a normal time. I don't know what their affiliations are,
00:23:48.680
but they present themselves as simply factual patriots, basically. Dads. So they have a dad
00:23:58.740
vibe, a patriot vibe, and just a practical vibe, like what makes sense, what doesn't make sense
00:24:04.760
without all the BS. And if you just simply try to call balls and strikes and just call things the
00:24:13.600
way you see them, like, hey, the border seems a little bit too open. I mean, nothing weird,
00:24:19.340
just the most ordinary observations, but the All In Pod can, you know, let you see things through
00:24:25.520
different windows and, you know, more interesting takes. But does he really think they're mega
00:24:31.900
extremists, or is there just something wrong with this guy? I don't know. And what's interesting about
00:24:38.460
it is that it's counter to the trend, which we'll talk about in a minute. There are, yet again, a few
00:24:45.440
more Biden brain malfunction videos where he tries to talk in public and things don't go well. I don't
00:24:51.540
need to get the details. Just be aware that he's failing fast. Have you seen a video recently of,
00:24:58.800
let's say, his debate performance in 2020? Have you ever seen that? Watch Biden's debate in 2020.
00:25:08.800
He is not the same person. In 2020, I was saying he's too old and we can't take a risk on this.
00:25:15.820
But if you see him by today's standard, he looked positively young and vibrant just at the beginning
00:25:23.520
of his term. He has lost so much. And indeed, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that both Democrats
00:25:31.800
and Republicans are saying privately that when they meet with him in the same room and they're
00:25:37.000
meeting privately, you're hearing stories like this. And this is back in January. I believe he's failed,
00:25:44.100
obviously, even since January. Would you agree? I think the last five months, you can see the
00:25:51.300
decline. It's obvious. But even in January, people said he spoke so softly at times that people struggled
00:26:00.080
to hear him. And he would read notes even from the most obvious points, meaning that he couldn't handle
00:26:07.800
even the most obvious thing you say about a topic. And they would pause for extended periods and
00:26:13.320
sometimes close his eyes for so long that sometimes they didn't know if he was even paying attention
00:26:19.460
to the meeting anymore. So those are reports from multiple people who have been in the room
00:26:27.320
with him recently. But counter to that, we have Morning Joe, who is here to tell us that not only
00:26:36.020
is Joe Biden is Joe Biden sharp, despite everything you see with your own eyes, behind closed doors,
00:26:43.360
he's the sharpest, smartest guy on internet. Oh, my God. Compared to somebody like McCarthy or any of
00:26:51.360
these other people. Oh, my God. I can't even tell you how smart Joe Biden is, how on top of it he is,
00:26:58.880
how his brain is like, just a perfect machine right now. Can you believe that Morning Joe actually
00:27:07.220
embarrassingly is pushing the most obviously not true thing, as if it's true? And I watched Mika,
00:27:17.100
she has what I call a Mika face. It looks like wife face, when your husband is saying some shit
00:27:25.320
that you're not quite buying into yourself. Do you think that Mika is fully on board with the Biden
00:27:31.920
looks fine to me? I don't think so. Look at her face. The whole time her husband is talking, she's got
00:27:39.900
like a weird little smile, like, yeah, I know what you're saying. And, you know, I kind of like the
00:27:47.500
direction of it. But I think everybody knows you're full of shit. So maybe you could tone that down
00:27:55.120
and embarrass me less on TV. That's what it feels like to me. Well, here's the funnest part. On MSNBC,
00:28:03.220
Michael Steele, well-known, prominent Democrat kind of a guy, calls out the fact that billionaires
00:28:11.360
are starting to make Trump look acceptable to other people. Oh, here it comes. Even the Democrats
00:28:19.060
have noticed that the billionaire class is starting to make Trump look acceptable and normal to people.
00:28:28.580
Ah, which billionaires are we talking about? Well, the Bill Ackmans, the Elon Musks. We're talking
00:28:35.500
about the all-in pod. We're talking about one of the guys at Blackstone. I think even Jamie Dimon,
00:28:44.780
not too long ago, said, hey, you know, keep an open mind, right? So he wasn't anti-Trump either.
00:28:52.960
So here's what I think. I think the billionaires are the ones who go first. Do you know why?
00:28:59.860
Because they don't have bosses. The people without bosses are the only ones who can tell the truth
00:29:06.360
in public if they're also rich. You get that? It's not a coincidence that the billionaire class
00:29:13.980
is rising in terms of its persuasion power. It has to, because there's nobody else who can do it.
00:29:22.160
And you know, I feel, and I see it, and you can almost just, it's just, it's palpable.
00:29:30.080
The incentive for the so-called billionaires that I mentioned, their incentive seems to be the
00:29:36.500
Spider-Man curse, as far as I can tell. They do not seem to be driven by partisan politics.
00:29:43.000
They don't seem to be driven just by profit. You know, they're not advocating for things
00:29:48.240
necessarily that are, you know, just good for them and stuff like that.
00:29:52.640
The Spider-Man curse, if you don't know what that is, from Spider-Man, with great responsibility,
00:29:58.780
with great power comes great responsibility. Imagine you're a billionaire, you're watching
00:30:04.780
the country dissolve, and you know it's because people can't tell the truth, that Biden's a
00:30:11.500
train wreck, and it's just got to be fixed. What would you do? Just ask yourself, what would
00:30:18.800
you do if you didn't have to fear anything, because you don't have a boss, and you're already
00:30:23.540
a billionaire, and what could go wrong? You would feel a responsibility to get involved
00:30:29.960
if you'd never been involved in politics before, because you're the only ones who can fix it.
00:30:36.080
Nobody's coming to help. Nobody's coming to help. It is just, it's just the billionaires
00:30:44.720
got to step up, and we're watching it happen. So that is a gigantic, gigantic change, and it's
00:30:52.500
scary enough that even the Democrats are noticing it. And not only are billionaires smart, but people
00:31:00.200
look up to them, because they want to be like them, you know, especially if you build something
00:31:03.620
of value. But this brings me to a comment that I saw Tucker Carlson make. He was on somebody's
00:31:14.760
podcast, and I'm going to talk about him a little bit more, but he had this interesting theory
00:31:19.760
that what we see as evil, you know, all the destructive things going on that we just sort
00:31:26.980
of collectively think are some form of evil. He says there's really people who don't know
00:31:32.660
how to make anything have an impulse to destroy the things made by people who do know how to
00:31:38.980
make things. Oh my God, is that on point? That actually might be the best description of
00:31:46.500
everything we're seeing. Marxism, Antifa, everything. And I've told you this story,
00:31:53.980
I think, before. The first time I discovered this thing where people will destroy anything
00:32:00.800
that looks like good work from other people is when I developed the Dilbert comic when I was still
00:32:07.160
working at my corporation at the phone company. So I had this whiteboard in my cubicle, and every day
00:32:13.320
for a while there, before I was published, I would draw a little comic of this character that came
00:32:19.020
to be Dilbert. And it became popular around the office, and people would like it. And here's the
00:32:25.540
thing. If you can do something like that that's sort of show-offy, it kind of demonstrates you have
00:32:32.320
some kind of genetic quality that somebody might want to mate with. Now, it'd be the same if I had
00:32:38.700
giant muscles, or if I were tall and had good hair, or if I were a good musician, you know,
00:32:44.840
any kind of talent. So if you display talent, what it does is it brings up in people the need to
00:32:52.560
destroy you if they don't have talent. Other people with talent will look at you and say,
00:32:58.600
hey, that's pretty good, because they're not afraid. They have talent. People who don't have talent
00:33:04.300
will find a way to destroy it or find something else wrong with you that means you should not,
00:33:09.800
nobody should pay attention to you. Here's how I discovered it when I would draw Dilbert on my
00:33:14.400
whiteboard. Men would come into my office, who are not exactly killing it in life, you know, just
00:33:20.160
your ordinary cubicle men, and they would find a reason to destroy the comic on my whiteboard.
00:33:26.580
And it was the damnedest thing. And women didn't do it. Women didn't do it. Ever. But I'll tell you
00:33:35.040
how they do it. They'd walk in, and they would lean on it. They would just lean on it. And they would
00:33:42.820
erase it with the back of their shirt. Or they'd be making a point, and they'd pick up a magic marker,
00:33:50.020
and they would start drawing right over, they would start drawing whatever their point was,
00:33:54.960
like directly over my drawing. Or they would pick up the eraser and erase my whiteboard in my office
00:34:02.720
of a drawing that I made. And then just start doing whatever they were going to tell me.
00:34:08.380
And I'm thinking to myself, there's something destructive about this that is so obvious,
00:34:14.140
and it was so consistent. Like, as soon as I saw a guy walk into my office, I'd say, all right,
00:34:19.580
how long is it going to take? And I would just watch how long it took him to accidentally destroy
00:34:25.500
my artwork. It was weird. So I've been watching that all my life, that phenomenon. Obviously,
00:34:33.580
when Dilbert became successful, oh, and by the way, it's a running joke on X. When people come at me
00:34:41.200
hard, you piece of crap, blah, blah, blah. I'll check their profile. Quite often, there are people
00:34:48.400
trying to be writers and failing, more often than not, or they're trying to be cartoonists and
00:34:54.660
failing. So they're all in some kind of failed art thing. So then when they see that I've succeeded,
00:35:00.040
they just have to tear me down. It's a natural impulse. And I think that might actually be
00:35:05.580
explaining almost everything we see. You know, we used to call it income inequality.
00:35:12.060
And we used to say, hey, you know, if we don't fix the income inequality, the people who don't have
00:35:18.720
are going to come after the people who have, and you've got a civil unrest, so you know, you better
00:35:22.940
fix it. But I think what it turned into is just destruction, where people are tearing down your city
00:35:30.040
you built, because they can't build it. They want to, you know, tear down Elon Musk, because they can't
00:35:36.780
build it. I mean, look at the fact that Elon Musk builds, you know, Tesla, and then some Delaware
00:35:43.240
bunch of punks who couldn't succeed at anything, decided to take away his paycheck of $53 billion.
00:35:51.400
Why'd they do that? Do you think they did that? Because that seemed like the right thing to do?
00:35:55.800
No. I mean, it might have been purely political. But I think if you see it under Tucker's filter,
00:36:01.380
it actually looks clear. They just didn't like the fact that there was a male who had, you know,
00:36:08.120
11 children and could impregnate anybody he wants, basically. And that he was just killing it in life,
00:36:15.400
and they had to just attack him, because they couldn't handle the stress of, you know, being
00:36:21.840
less than him by so much. So look for that effect. It's everywhere. It's fake poll season. Newsweek has
00:36:30.920
some fake polls where Joe Biden is suddenly leading Donald Trump in multiple battleground states.
00:36:37.060
Oh, yeah. I'm sure that really happened. I'm sorry. And if you read all the way to the end of the
00:36:43.440
article, it'll be like, well, they started the poll online, and then they... I said, wait, what?
00:36:51.760
They started it online, and then some of it's not online? What good is an online poll?
00:37:02.180
Why in the world would you report an online poll without saying, okay, this is not scientific,
00:37:08.100
but we did an online poll? Now, I don't mind that, because at least you know what you're getting.
00:37:12.640
But you have to go all the way to the end to find out it's not even a little bit credible.
00:37:20.380
And I think I read the entire article without seeing who did the poll.
00:37:25.360
I think it might have been there, but normally a story about polling,
00:37:30.820
they put the polling entity in the first paragraph. Right? You've all seen stories about poll results.
00:37:39.380
It's the first paragraph. I'm not even sure it was in the story in this case.
00:37:45.500
So it's exactly what it looks like. It's fake poll time, and the fakest of the fake news
00:37:51.460
will be the ones that are reporting them. So Newsweek, you should just assume,
00:37:55.860
is a bullshit publication and just a Democrat organ at this point.
00:38:01.700
All right. Rasmussen had a poll that 63% of Democrats believe the judge has sentenced Trump to prison.
00:38:08.820
I don't know. These kinds of polls are just people going to line up on political grounds.
00:38:17.800
Yeah, I don't know what to make much of this. Everybody thinks the other side should go to jail.
00:38:27.540
I'm seeing some smart people say that the prosecution of Hunter for the gun charges
00:38:33.000
might not be what we think it is. On the surface, it looks like, oh,
00:38:38.300
justice is blind, and even the president's son can be, you know, charged and go to jail for crimes
00:38:45.700
because that's how good our system is. It's a fair system.
00:38:50.260
But he's being tried in Delaware, where we're expecting a hung jury of people who just like him.
00:38:57.780
Maybe the judge is fake. You know, maybe jury nullification.
00:39:01.620
So you're basically seeing a situation which might be a completely fake trial
00:39:08.220
to show the country that, well, you know, there's no law fair against Trump
00:39:13.820
because, look, even Hunter Biden's being, you know, being handled by the law.
00:39:19.580
So it must be fair because it's happening to Hunter.
00:39:24.140
It happened to Trump. I mean, that's as fair as you can get, right?
00:39:27.680
Well, as others have pointed out, the gun charge is the one most disconnected from his father
00:39:39.480
and the one that doesn't get you to anywhere near any discovery about anything that Hunter did
00:39:46.020
with Burisma or Ukraine. Is that a coincidence?
00:39:50.040
The only one we're seeing is the only one that has nothing to do with politics.
00:39:56.400
And it's the only one that makes Hunter look a little sympathetic
00:39:59.300
because Republicans and people like me say, you know what?
00:40:05.060
We do like people to have some flexibility about owning guns.
00:40:11.100
You know, I mean, until a crime has been committed, that's, you know, a different situation.
00:40:15.320
And although he did seem to be reckless with his guns, so this, you know,
00:40:21.640
I can't say it's the wrong decision in this particular case, but they did.
00:40:27.540
It's probably not a coincidence that he's being tried for the only thing
00:40:32.740
that would divert you from Joe Biden, the only thing that would give you
00:40:36.880
maybe some sympathy for Hunter because it's really about his addiction.
00:40:40.360
And I do have sympathy for that. And at the same time,
00:40:50.580
So it's everything. It's everything for Democrats.
00:40:57.200
They can get him off and say, well, I guess it was nothing there.
00:41:01.000
And then they can say, and obviously the law affair against Trump is real
00:41:04.500
because look, the law is operating wherever there's a crime.
00:41:15.380
Facebook slash meta is rumored to be thinking about testing unstoppable ads
00:41:26.260
Why don't they just tape my eyeballs open and feed me ads?
00:41:31.280
In The Hill, publication The Hill, Democrats are saying that Biden needs to appear
00:41:39.980
more in touch with voters' needs, especially inflation.
00:41:45.500
Well, I thought their plan was to say Trump was the cause of the inflation.
00:41:49.800
And I would like to introduce the theme for today,
00:41:56.220
which is everything the Democrats are doing is imaginary.
00:42:06.060
So Biden's going to pretend to address inflation,
00:42:09.460
and he's going to pretend it was Trump's fault.
00:42:15.800
But on the border, since the border was his weakest political issue,
00:42:21.220
Biden's issuing some executive order that looks like it's completely a hoax,
00:42:29.460
but it won't come anywhere near ending the crisis at the border.
00:42:35.900
He's going to sell it like, well, it's as far as we can go
00:42:47.260
But it's supposed to put a limit on the asylum seekers,
00:42:51.420
but there are so many other holes that it leaves open.
00:43:03.180
He's got a fake executive order about the border.
00:43:08.860
And, well, but he's also got a fake Gaza peace plan,
00:43:20.760
So he's trying to make it look as though he's got some peace coming,
00:43:25.920
but that appears to be fake and just for politics.
00:43:29.880
So he's got a fake economic idea about inflation,
00:43:33.600
the fake border idea, and a fake Gaza peace plan.
00:43:38.860
Meanwhile, Jake Sullivan was meeting with the families of American hostages,
00:43:43.320
and he told them that if the president's peace plan, which is fake, gets adopted,
00:43:49.860
then maybe that would help free their families, the hostages who are Americans.
00:43:56.060
Now, this is another example of Democrats failing to understand human motivation in every domain.
00:44:05.120
What happens if you negotiate with the people who have your hostages?
00:44:16.180
If you want to have more hostages, give them something before they give the hostages back.
00:44:21.620
Let me tell you how you should deal with the hostages.
00:44:29.000
Things that are going to disappear in the order that they will disappear until all of our hostages are back.
00:44:35.660
And then after they're back, we'll maybe try to help them with a peace plan.
00:44:40.380
But until then, Israel can do whatever the fuck they want.
00:44:44.400
As long as Hamas has one American hostage, and we know it, Israel can slaughter the whole fucking bunch of them.
00:44:55.640
They're basically killing their own people at this point.
00:44:58.400
Because if they're going to make their own citizens hostages and our citizens,
00:45:03.520
unfortunately, the only way you can prevent this happening in the future
00:45:07.700
is to do things that nobody with good conscience would want to do.
00:45:11.900
But fortunately, we have people who are willing to do hard things, and they're very willing to do it.
00:45:19.620
So I think we should just say to Hamas, here's the deal.
00:45:23.400
Here's all the stuff that's going to disappear.
00:45:26.400
And then, of course, they're going to call the bluff.
00:45:29.100
And then you say, all right, we just gave some mother-of-all bombs to Israel,
00:45:34.720
and they're going to drop them on this neighborhood.
00:45:39.120
And you just make the whole neighborhood disappear.
00:45:44.960
But unless you go savage, they're just going to keep taking Americans.
00:45:51.460
So, and by the way, you know, who knows if we could really ever get them back.
00:46:04.580
So when do we notice that everything that Biden has done is imaginary?
00:46:10.120
So he ran for office on the fine people hoax and the drinking bleach hoax.
00:46:14.420
Hillary Clinton ran on the Russia collusion hoax.
00:46:17.320
Now he's got a fake border plan, a fake Gaza plan, plan to blame Trump for inflation.
00:46:26.420
Fake in the sense that they're not telling us the real reason we're in Ukraine.
00:46:34.300
We're a pirate ship trying to take the booty from another pirate ship.
00:46:38.140
But he's telling us we're fighting for, I don't know, my democracy or something.
00:46:49.400
You've got the polls showing Biden pulling ahead.
00:46:53.840
You've got the Morning Joe and the MSNBC crowd still protecting the Democrats.
00:47:04.680
And now they want, here's the things they want us to believe.
00:47:08.020
By the way, did you know that dementia causes paranoia?
00:47:12.280
Dementia is well known to cause paranoia and confusion and memory problems.
00:47:21.220
Let me tell you some of the things that Biden is saying about Trump.
00:47:25.180
And you tell me if this sounds like a person in their right mind,
00:47:29.760
or does it sound like somebody with dementia-fueled paranoia?
00:47:54.720
Every fucking thing that Joe Biden is promoting is fake.
00:48:01.680
Do Republicans sometimes promise things they don't deliver?
00:48:08.660
But even if you take something like, you know, Trump promising the wall and not quite delivering,
00:48:22.460
Do you blame him for saying Mexico will pay for the wall?
00:48:32.880
But so you've got Republicans who are suggesting specific real world things,
00:48:41.120
and you've got Democrats who have nothing to run on because their whole world is falling apart.
00:48:46.480
They've destroyed everything that we care about, and we know it because we're watching it in real time.
00:48:53.020
So the only thing they have is dementia-fueled paranoia that they're trying to get you to buy into.
00:48:59.280
All right, we got this dementia-fueled paranoid guy, and he's going to complain about his candy getting too small.
00:49:05.620
So maybe you should change your vote because Mr. Small Candy said so.
00:49:09.440
I'm getting tired of being the only one pointing out that the entire Democratic platform for years has been nothing but fucking bullshit.
00:49:22.480
We can't make that the whole story, that nothing they do is real.
00:49:34.360
Anyway, here's some other things Dr. Carlson said that were just so fun.
00:49:42.000
He said he met Klaus Schwab himself, and he doesn't really fear the WEF because Klaus Schwab is just an idiot,
00:49:49.400
and most of the people in power are idiots too.
00:49:52.020
So I don't think you have to worry about the all-powerful World Economic Forum.
00:49:58.640
Now, Elon Musk has a view not too far from that, that it's basically a club for rich people, and don't worry about it too much.
00:50:09.360
I don't think the World Economic Forum is why we're fighting in Ukraine.
00:50:15.460
Do you think that's what they would have picked?
00:50:19.140
Tucker also believes that human beings are mating with non-human beings.
00:50:29.200
There are some kind of entities that walk the earth looking like people and have always been here, you know, throughout time.
00:50:43.660
And he does believe the literal truth of his religion and the Bible.
00:50:54.140
So, and he thinks that the government knows this and won't tell us.
00:51:01.380
Now, I haven't seen too many things that seem less believable to me than that.
00:51:07.340
But it's so interesting that it's coming from Tucker.
00:51:12.820
Because so much of what he says is so right on point, as I mentioned earlier.
00:51:18.820
But there's something about Tucker that makes him different from other people.
00:51:24.000
I also think he's got, he was talking to somebody who believes that the secret sonic ray is real.
00:51:31.140
So, yeah, he has a lot of people who have claims of UFOs and aliens and stuff like that.
00:51:39.980
And my take on Tucker, because he said it directly, he said it directly, he kind of likes to believe in some of the fantastic stuff.
00:51:51.520
Meaning that he seems to have some really good way of separating the real world, the politics.
00:52:00.140
Because he talks about it in the most real world way you ever talk about anything.
00:52:04.540
But when he talks about his religious beliefs or his belief about reality,
00:52:08.460
he seems to have a lifestyle preference for believing, let's say, fantastical things.
00:52:26.820
I mean, you can even observe it from a distance, that his choice of religion works for him.
00:52:34.960
Even if it's not your religion, it looks like it works for him.
00:52:38.180
So, I think Tucker has to be seen as a lifestyle believer.
00:52:46.580
I don't necessarily think, if you put a gun to my head,
00:52:49.640
I wouldn't necessarily say that aliens built the pyramids.
00:52:57.640
So, I guess I believe, believe, you know, like if you're going to, you know, murder my dog,
00:53:04.180
if I get the wrong answer, I might go, all right, it's not aliens after all.
00:53:08.080
But, you know, it's easy to adopt non, you know, beliefs that don't matter because they don't affect your life if they're fun.
00:53:19.180
So, that's my best guess is he has fun beliefs that don't have any impact on your life.
00:53:25.540
And then in the real world, he seems really careful about staking to what's real when he talks about the real world.
00:53:39.180
Let's take a look at Tucker Carlson's theory that people who can't build things will destroy the things built by other people.
00:54:00.660
His wife, his widow, seems to be active in politics and the side of politics that is destroying everything.
00:54:10.240
It wouldn't be true that Steve Jobs built and his widow is destroying what, at least what good there is in the country.
00:54:29.600
Jeff Bezos built a gigantic, you know, most successful company.
00:54:37.800
She donates to all the organizations that are destructive.
00:54:41.420
Now, she doesn't think of it that way, I'm sure.
00:54:45.560
So, it seems to me that you've got Elon Musk will build a company, but idiots in Delaware will try to take his money away.
00:54:54.720
Bezos builds a company and his ex-wife takes half his money and uses it to destroy the country.
00:55:05.820
Now, if you ask them, they wouldn't say they're destroying anything, which, and I believe that they would believe it.
00:55:12.120
It's just that the impulse to destroy what better people built is so strong.
00:55:20.340
I can tell you that in my journey from having no money to being well off, when I had no money, I would have destroyed things.
00:55:30.880
The idea of putting graffiti on somebody else's asset, somebody rich, was actually attractive to me at one point in my life.
00:55:44.620
Because I was a jealous little fuck who had nothing.
00:55:49.500
I'm not speculating what it feels like to have nothing and be surrounded by people who have a lot.
00:55:55.980
I absolutely felt a destructive impulse toward their success.
00:56:00.220
When I became successful, you know, this is the old story.
00:56:05.820
You become more conservative if you become successful because you don't want anybody to take it away from you.
00:56:12.680
I became much more alarmed to see assets destroyed.
00:56:17.640
Now, when I see graffiti on somebody's nice, expensive building, I don't say, well, you had it coming, you know, clean it up yourself.
00:56:27.140
Now I think, what the hell are you doing, destroying somebody's beautiful thing they built?
00:56:32.460
And I think that has a lot to do with the animosity toward Trump.
00:56:38.300
Trump is not only somebody who apparently built things, you know, big, beautiful buildings, but he also brags.
00:56:47.780
If you add the bragging to the success, you trigger people to want to destroy you because they're not successful.
00:56:58.500
The least successful people want to destroy him.
00:57:05.220
The billionaires are just looking at it and saying, OK, who can be a better president?
00:57:09.920
But they're not trying to destroy other billionaires because they have their own stuff.
00:57:19.000
New York Times is reporting that the GOP is looking for revenge.
00:57:23.020
And indeed, on social media and other places, we do see people, you know, talking about putting lists together of Democrats who should be investigated and tried should Trump come to office.
00:57:42.080
My advice to you would be to cool it on the revenge stuff because, first of all, you shouldn't call it revenge because it's hard to back that.
00:57:55.460
I mean, to me, it's more a mutually assured destruction, meaning you have to establish a precedent that if the other team is going to go to that level of badness, you're going to match it and they're not going to like it.
00:58:07.480
So there is something to be said for, you know, creating a disincentive to do more of it.
00:58:24.000
So, also, America First Legal, I believe that's Stephen Miller's entity he created, is suing the Department of Justice for records related to key figures
00:58:37.000
in the New York case versus Trump to find out what they did to coordinate with the White House.
00:58:44.120
So, apparently, they asked for but did not get records under the FOIA.
00:58:51.860
They wanted to get records about Matthew Colangelo because he was a key figure in the Biden administration, but he left that to go work on the lawfare against Trump.
00:59:03.140
And it's a completely good question, which is, hmm, maybe we should know what conversations happened because this looks like a political prosecution in every way.
00:59:15.860
And so, America First Legal is going to say, well, let's find out.
00:59:23.500
Let us find out if this was political because it looks like it.
00:59:27.180
So, America First Legal is the only thing that looks like the republic to me.
00:59:35.560
We don't see the press doing what the press is supposed to do.
00:59:39.640
We don't see the politicians do what the politicians we'd want them to do anyway.
00:59:44.120
But America First Legal is doing everything I want them to do.
00:59:53.060
I want to make sure that the lawfare on the left is matched with some lawfare on the right for disincentive purposes, not for revenge.
01:00:05.100
But I would certainly like to have a mutually assured destruction in case either side gets out of hand.
01:00:14.560
This is the part that if you were nice enough to last this long, I'm going to tell you something provocative.
01:00:24.240
You know that for a long time I've been trying to figure out the mystery that is George Soros.
01:00:31.080
Because people said to me, Scott, he's behind the funding of all these things that are bad.
01:01:16.020
It looks like they have nothing to actually say.
01:01:19.820
So here's my provocative hypothesis about why George Soros is doing what he did.
01:01:24.500
So apparently back in the early 90s, when he started drawing up his plans for his open society, he had some lofty goals, which I have to admit sound pretty darn good on paper.
01:01:37.660
Now, I haven't looked into them, but my understanding is there would be things like, wouldn't it be great if people could immigrate to where the work is, right?
01:01:50.420
It wouldn't be great if people could improve their lives by being able to move from a bad place to a good place.
01:01:56.420
Now, that sounds pretty damn good on paper because you assume, you know, it's just obvious that you wouldn't do uncontrolled immigration, but wouldn't it be great if you can get a work permit, you know, some kind of an easier process so, you know, everybody's economy would be better.
01:02:14.820
Now, the economics of that and the logic of that are actually really strong because every time that you give people more freedom, they can make more money.
01:02:25.100
It seems it's pretty much one-to-one, more freedom, more money, more freedom, more money, you know, as long as you've got crime under control, right?
01:02:34.280
Freedom within, you know, the legal structure, not freedom to do crime.
01:02:39.120
So on paper, that makes a lot of sense to me, you know, with my economics background, I go, you know what?
01:02:44.880
It does make sense that if you increase people's mobility across borders, that probably everybody would do well as long as you managed it right.
01:02:55.500
Now, like everything in the world, if you do it wrong, well, it's a disaster, right?
01:03:00.920
Now, apparently there's also something about the justice system and how it was unfair to black Americans and minorities in general.
01:03:12.460
And suppose that they said our solution is to vastly increase the diversity in the justice system.
01:03:20.180
And then we wouldn't worry so much that it's, you know, white racism that's causing these, you know, what seems to be imbalances and sentencing and other things.
01:03:37.620
If minority members of my country are complaining that they seem to be, in their opinion, their lived experience, they're mistreated, then it seems to me an obvious solution to increase the diversity of highly qualified candidates.
01:03:54.320
And just to have a better perspective in the whole legal system.
01:04:08.660
We're seeing that, you know, things that are getting funded are like crazy things, like Black Lives Matter and Antifa and Open Borders.
01:04:17.040
And so there's this huge disconnect between what sounded pretty rational to me in the 90s.
01:04:33.620
Like, why wouldn't you say, wow, that didn't work?
01:04:35.640
Or are we still like these things, but we're going to have to put much better guardrails on them?
01:04:43.300
Now, the theories I've heard just don't make any sense to me.
01:04:48.080
Elon Musk, one of the smartest people around, says that he thinks that George Soros just hates humanity.
01:05:02.860
He's seen the darkest side of humanity because he was around during the Holocaust.
01:05:07.960
So, yeah, he's seen the darkest side of humans.
01:05:12.000
Do you put all of that effort into this very specific way of moving things just because you hate humanity?
01:05:20.640
I mean, there must be way better ways to hate humanity.
01:05:24.080
It's a lot of work to hate humanity in that very specific hard work kind of a way.
01:05:30.960
Then there are others who say, well, it's a Marxist thing.
01:05:39.880
But you can't tell me that the greatest capitalist of all time is secretly funding the Marxist so they can take all of his money away someday and his family will be locked up in jail or something.
01:05:53.680
So I don't believe that it could be because George Soros hates humanity.
01:06:08.060
And then other people said, no, he destabilizes things so he can make money.
01:06:25.900
I mean, if you did, I mean, I suppose you could make money.
01:06:30.840
I mean, you wouldn't expect like a smart guy to do that.
01:06:39.060
I knew you were going to hit me with the all capital Jewish conspiracy.
01:07:00.160
It would be easier if you never came to my live stream again.
01:07:02.660
Because I can tell you that screaming in all caps that it's the Jews is not good persuasion.
01:07:11.820
You just look like a fucking piece of shit who doesn't know anything about anything.
01:07:21.900
But here is my hypothesis that ties it all together.
01:07:27.280
Number one, you've seen that Huma Abedin is now allegedly dating Alex Soros.
01:07:41.040
If you were a FBI profiler and a forensic, let's say, money person, and you were trying to figure out, like, why money is going from one place to another.
01:07:54.900
But you were going to use FBI stereotyping, profiling kind of thing, which I hate to say, could be a little sexist and racist.
01:08:04.820
For example, let's say an FBI profiler finds out that there's been a mass shooter.
01:08:12.620
Does the profiler say, okay, I think it's about even money.
01:08:20.700
They go full sexist, and they say, all right, it's a man.
01:08:25.980
And then if it's a certain kind of mass murder, do they say, hmm, I think an Asian was involved in this.
01:08:35.200
They say, oh, this kind of looks like a white guy crime.
01:08:39.620
There are just some crimes that just scream white guy.
01:08:46.600
Where you're looking for these general, you know, tendencies and statistical things.
01:08:53.500
Now, if I, let me give you, I'm going to work at this slowly so I can give you the big finish in a minute.
01:09:02.580
Suppose I told you that there were two billionaires.
01:09:11.720
One was Ukraine and one was Black Lives Matter.
01:09:17.280
But you didn't have confirmation which billionaire was funding Ukraine and which one was funding Black Lives Matter.
01:09:27.280
Could be that the black billionaire cares about Ukraine.
01:09:30.400
Could be the white billionaire cares about Black Lives Matter.
01:09:33.140
But if you're an FBI profiler and you had to visit one of them to confirm which way it was, you'd probably, you know, if you wanted to know it was BLM, you'd probably try the black guy first because people like to fund things they have some kind of personal association with.
01:09:52.000
If you see that, if you see a celebrity is helping raise money for a specific disease, sorry, for a specific disease, do you say to yourself, oh, they randomly picked a specific disease?
01:10:09.500
Or do you say, no, probably they either had experience with it or a family member?
01:10:14.340
Because these are the kind of tendencies you see.
01:10:16.560
So look at George Soros' funding and all the things he's funded, from Black Lives Matter to Antifa to LGBTQ things to open borders.
01:10:36.060
In the comments, somebody's still yelling in all caps, the Jews, the Jews.
01:10:41.160
Let me finish my hypothesis, which doesn't have anything to do with that, by the way.
01:10:55.780
If I were to guess who was the billionaire who was funding all the things I mentioned, I wouldn't say a Hungarian octogenarian white guy.
01:11:07.120
It's not impossible, you know, if he's just ultra lefty or whatever, but it's not the first thing you think of.
01:11:15.880
The first thing I would think of was that the funding was coming from a gay black American who lived in either L.A. or New York and was, you know, had sort of maybe a Marxist open borders bent.
01:11:45.060
Now, Alex Soros, as we've been told, is dating Uma Abedin.
01:11:54.460
Again, he's not a gay black man on either coast.
01:12:04.780
I mean, he seems like he'd probably be a capitalist.
01:12:09.680
Well, somebody clued me into his prior relationships.
01:12:15.980
And if you believe all the photographs on the Internet, of which there are many, before Uma Abedin, and I don't know the timing exactly, but it looked like he was similar age to what he is now.
01:12:29.120
He had some kind of a relationship with a gay black fashion designer from L.A.
01:12:35.040
And if you look at the photos, they're very close, or what they were.
01:12:42.040
And if they are, I don't know, maybe it's still going on.
01:12:45.220
But the look of it is that he was the dominant partner.
01:12:52.980
So the partner was a very large man, and Alex Soros is a smaller man.
01:12:58.640
And when you see them sort of posing for pictures, the larger man is holding the smaller man almost like a submissive.
01:13:06.400
So imagine if you would, the panic there would be if you're a top Democrat and a normal person.
01:13:17.700
Suppose you're Hillary, let's call her normal for now, or you're Barack Obama, or you're just any one of the normal, you know, Kerry Democrats.
01:13:27.040
And you see that your biggest problem is that George Soros keeps funding the craziest people in the world.
01:13:33.240
And you have to explain it because it's part of your party, and you can't do anything because he also funds you, right?
01:13:47.440
I would send my agent, Huma Abedin, to control Alex Soros.
01:13:54.700
I would find a way to get him out of that relationship with his boyfriend.
01:13:58.680
And I would make sure that there was an adult in the room that reported to Hillary Clinton and the adults in the Democratic Party who was making sure that he did not do crazy shit.
01:14:10.620
Now, you're saying to yourself, Scott, you're talking as if Alexander Soros is like a moron or a child or something.
01:14:19.440
If you've heard him talk, which is rare, because he doesn't give interviews that I've seen, but I did see him talking at some event, and he seemed to be a moron, as in really a moron, not like the usual kind where we say, oh, this politician's a moron.
01:14:41.900
So it seems to me that you're watching a Clinton op on their own team.
01:14:51.240
It looks like Clinton and Obama realized they had to take control of Alexander Soros because they need to stop him funding the crazy shit and keeping the border open and funding people who are going to cause riots and all kinds of insane things because they can't defend it when trying to get Biden back in office.
01:15:13.820
So did you know that Huma Abedin is 10 years older than Alexander Soros?
01:15:22.780
Did you see the photo, the only photo, the only photo of them in something that looks like a date?
01:15:30.300
If you look at his hand, you know, she's cuddling up to him at a booth in a restaurant.
01:15:42.540
He's got his hand in a little like a loose fist while it's around her waist.
01:15:48.520
Who poses for a photo with their girlfriend, puts their hand around their back and does not put their hand flat on the on the body of the person?
01:16:07.180
And I don't think that somebody with billions of dollars is dating somebody 10 years older.
01:16:12.840
Can you give me an example of the other billionaire who decided to date somebody 10 years older?
01:16:22.600
Has there ever been a billionaire who ever voluntarily got into a relationship, a male billionaire, who got into a relationship with somebody 10 years older?
01:16:33.080
Now, I mean, I realize that's an ugly thought, but I've never seen it.
01:16:39.780
So, I propose to you that this is an op and that there's a game within the game in which the Democrats are trying to wrestle control of this big bank called Soros.
01:16:54.100
I believe that the senior Soros is checked out and had no idea where his money was going or what damage it was doing.
01:17:12.440
And the only way that makes sense is if there was somebody who was controlling Alexander Soros to do the very worst things that didn't make sense at all.
01:17:23.740
But he was not capable enough or strong enough to say no or even to know what was wrong.
01:17:46.820
As long as Alexander Soros doesn't give interviews, and I'm assuming he's turning him down because he would be the most interesting person you could ever interview.
01:18:04.360
Now, if I'm wrong, it would be easy to sort it out.
01:18:24.940
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is all I have on that.
01:18:28.920
There's something you didn't see on your other podcasts.
01:18:35.120
So, just in case somebody wants to sue me, I want to say I don't know that any of this is true.
01:18:41.020
I'm saying that if I were an FBI profiler, that's what it looks like.
01:18:55.300
There's just a weak person with billions of dollars, and people are wrestling to control.
01:19:03.820
But I'm going to say bye to the people on X and YouTube and Rumble.
01:19:19.160
He got in his relationship before he was a billionaire, or before he was important.
01:19:25.400
So, if you could come up with other examples, it'd be fun.
01:19:31.440
I'm going to say I'm going to stick with just the locals people, but I know there's a delay here.
01:19:38.160
So, I'm going to make sure that you know that I'm going to close you down and talk to locals only.