Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 08, 2024


Episode 2499 CWSA 06⧸08⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per Minute

150.20923

Word Count

11,487

Sentence Count

833

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

It's my birthday today, and as some of you already know, it's a pretty big deal that I'm 67 years old. And let me tell you, a perspective of my age is really different than I thought it would be.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 All right. Well, welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the best place in the world. If you'd
00:00:06.100 like to take this experience, this Saturday experience, up to levels that nobody can even
00:00:10.540 understand with their smooth, tiny human brains, all you need for that is a cuppa, a mug, or a
00:00:15.640 glass, a tank, or gels, or stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your
00:00:20.860 favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of dopamine. At the end of
00:00:26.140 the day, the thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous sip and happens.
00:00:29.560 Now go. Oh, so good. So, so good. Well, as some of you already know, apparently, it's my birthday,
00:00:44.780 67 years young today. And let me tell you, let me give you some perspective.
00:00:56.140 of my age is really different than I thought it would be. I don't know what I expected about
00:01:05.360 being this age, but it's not anything like I imagined it to be. It's way better. You know,
00:01:10.840 it has its challenges, of course, but it's way better than you think it would be. So if you're
00:01:16.140 25 and you're saying, oh, no, it's going to be so terrible when I'm in my 60s, maybe, I mean,
00:01:23.520 can't guarantee anything, but there are plenty of people my age who are happier than they've ever
00:01:28.400 been, which defies all observation and common sense. But there it is. It's true.
00:01:35.200 Well, I don't, I'm not the only person with the birthday today. I share the birthday with
00:01:42.920 Kanye, yay, and also Ashley Biden. I think, well, I think so anyway. Let me tell you a little story
00:01:55.140 about yesterday that's going to make you happy or potentially. So I've got to reframe where I
00:02:03.940 start to understand my moods as being simply dopamine shortages. Now it might be some other
00:02:10.220 chemical, but I just use dopamine as the catch-all. So yesterday I had a really long day, started to
00:02:16.600 work at, I don't know, 3.30 in the morning, something like that. Not too unusual for me.
00:02:21.480 And I was really just hitting it all day long. And I didn't do any exercise. I went to ride my e-bike
00:02:29.900 that, you know, I planned my whole day around it. And just when I was ready to go, I had the tires
00:02:36.620 filled. I accidentally ripped the stem out of the tire and, well, that was the end of my exercise
00:02:43.140 plans. So I found myself suddenly in this deep, deep funk. You know, some would call it a depression.
00:02:55.000 Some would say sad. Some would say I have no energy. But I've started to define it as simply
00:03:00.560 as being low on dopamine. And when you do that, it tells you how to fix it. So I'm sitting there and
00:03:08.020 I'm thinking, oh God, you know, I just want to like fall off a cliff. Somewhat instantly, you know,
00:03:14.020 because the rest of my day was great. But just when the dopamine hit that level where it's just too
00:03:18.960 low, you just can't be happy. So thanks to a lifetime of habit building, I managed to engineer
00:03:28.860 my way out. And I did it a little bit at a time. First is, how do you even get out of your chair?
00:03:36.780 So for that, I use the pinky trick. If you can move your pinky, you can probably move your hand.
00:03:42.820 If you can move your hand, your arm will move. And then you can stand up. So you just get yourself
00:03:46.920 going by moving the smallest muscle and let that build. So that's how you get up. Now, that's just
00:03:55.300 a trick. Now, luckily I had enough mental, you know, mental wherewithal that I knew that I could
00:04:01.240 use the trick. So now I'm up. So the first thing I know is that motion creates dopamine. So I've got
00:04:08.440 to walk. I got to at least walk around, do a chore or something like that. So I decided I'll walk around
00:04:13.820 and look for my dog and I'll give her some love because, you know, I can get a little dopamine from
00:04:20.240 that. So now I'm up. I'm moving. That's dopamine. Playing with the dog. That's dopamine. And then,
00:04:27.880 you know, I'm just getting more active and doing a bunch of things and eating some food that wasn't
00:04:32.400 bad for me. And next thing you know, all good. So it was as simple as identifying that I was low on a
00:04:43.580 chemical and then saying, what causes that chemical to go up? Oh, I can go outdoors. So I went outdoors
00:04:51.420 and it was exactly the way it was supposed to work. If you do these things, your dopamine goes up
00:04:59.020 and then your mind fixes itself. It was exactly the way it was supposed to work. So I recommend that.
00:05:08.620 Move your pinky to get up, do some moving, grab a dog, go outside, eat something that's healthy.
00:05:16.800 You might know that my book, God's Debris, is now out. And this is, if you've heard the name
00:05:25.140 God's Debris before, because it's a classic that I wrote a few decades ago, back when it was this
00:05:31.060 little book, it now includes the little book plus the bigger book, well, not the bigger book, but the
00:05:36.360 sequel, plus a new short story that completes the arc. Now, I don't want to brag. That's a lie.
00:05:47.920 I love to brag. I just like to make it look like I couldn't help it. So you know how if you win a
00:05:55.300 Nobel Prize, you might, maybe you just have one good year that you win the Nobel Prize. You're always
00:06:02.020 a Nobel Prize winner. If you win an Academy Award, even if it's just one movie in one role. Well,
00:06:09.700 you're always an Academy Award winner. Am I right? That's just the way it works. Well, it works that
00:06:16.140 way with books, too. If you're ever a number one bestseller, you're always a bestselling author.
00:06:23.820 They can never take it away from you. And with God's Debris, it's in many different categories,
00:06:29.240 because it spreads across philosophy and science fiction and metaphysics and religion. And it's
00:06:37.440 like five, six different categories. And I was checking out how it was doing. It's number one
00:06:42.440 in all of its relevant categories already. But one of the categories was the same category that Amazon
00:06:49.520 puts the Holy Bible. So for just a little while, my book was number one on one of the Amazon lists
00:06:59.720 that included the Bible, which was running at number eight.
00:07:05.900 So I mean, I don't want to get ahead of myself. But as a factual matter,
00:07:10.440 I'm just going to state it as factual. I don't want to add any hyperbole to it.
00:07:16.060 But for a short period of time, I sold more books than God. Now, I'm not saying not overall,
00:07:26.340 not overall. Overall, God beats me like hands down. It's like a billion to one, right? But just for
00:07:33.440 a moment, just that little slice of time, sold more books than God. So I just want to put that out
00:07:43.940 there. You can never take that away from me, just like anything else. All right. Oh, by the way,
00:07:51.960 if you tried to order the book, the hardcover, it's going to tell you that it's not available
00:07:55.940 to December, but that's a glitch. It is available. We'll fix the glitch. You could wait for that.
00:08:03.500 But I think you'd be fine ordering it anyway, because the glitch will get fixed and you'll get
00:08:07.880 it faster than December. Should only take a week or something like that. Anyway, the CEO of Zoom wants
00:08:15.120 to create AI digital clones that can go to meetings for you. So you'll have a digital clone and you just
00:08:22.500 do a Zoom call and you don't even have to be there. Your clone will do it. Now, is it my imagination or
00:08:31.480 as reality finally caught up to Dilbert Comics? Because I'm pretty sure I've done this Dilbert
00:08:36.900 comic a few times. In various forms, Wally has figured out how to use AI and remote work to not
00:08:47.200 work. So yes, in Dilbert's world, they will be creating a Zoom AI before the actual Zoom company
00:08:55.840 does. Probably as early as this coming week. Well, meanwhile, the American College of Pediatricians
00:09:05.440 just put out a statement saying that they're calling on all the major medical associations
00:09:11.320 and they name them each by name to stop doing the gender transition stuff. And they said,
00:09:19.520 immediately stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones,
00:09:25.120 and surgeries for children, blah, blah, blah. And the reasoning is that the science is coming in
00:09:30.720 and the science seems to suggest fairly unambiguously that the childhood transitions
00:09:37.280 are more bad than good. Now, here's what I'd like to suggest. I wonder if you've noticed a trend.
00:09:47.280 Have you noticed a trend where the idiots on the X platform are three years ahead of the
00:09:54.860 highest, most qualified scientists and healthcare professionals in the world?
00:10:00.380 That's not my imagination, right? Because, correct me if I'm wrong, every idiot on social media knew
00:10:08.760 this was a bad idea and knew it was bad for kids. And it took science how many years? How many years did
00:10:17.040 it take science to figure out this was a bad idea? Maybe you should cut it out? And it's not like
00:10:22.880 that's the only example where the people on X as sort of an average got the right answer years before the
00:10:30.880 experts. You want to hear another one? Nuclear power. Nuclear energy is now acceptable basically to everybody.
00:10:40.560 And the greenies are loving it. They're lapping it up. That took X probably five years of people who
00:10:49.440 just sort of looked into it on their own, you know, plus listening to people who are smarter than us,
00:10:54.320 you know. And we got it right. So X was maybe three to five years ahead of, you know,
00:11:04.480 the people who are supposed to be smart on this topic. How about the pandemic? Now we know what
00:11:12.620 science did versus what the people on X just sort of guessed was true. The people were just guessing
00:11:21.200 collectively. Now I'm using that for hyperbole. They were doing their own research as well. But
00:11:28.240 the average person on X got the right answers about the pandemic way before the experts.
00:11:34.000 Why? Because science isn't science anymore. It's just followed the money.
00:11:38.880 If you ever thought science was real, maybe it was, you know, back when Newton was doing it.
00:11:45.520 Galileo, that was probably pretty real. But now it's just whatever your boss wants to fund,
00:11:50.880 you know, whatever you can get a grant for. So at the moment, science is completely broken.
00:11:55.440 But the collective wisdom of social media on X at least is picking up the slack. So the rabble,
00:12:06.720 you know, the unwashed masses were right about trans kids, transitioning kids too early.
00:12:14.880 Nuclear power, right about the pandemic. I wonder if they'll be right about anything else.
00:12:20.560 How about our food supply? Do you think the experts have come out and said, whoa, whoa, whoa,
00:12:26.560 stop eating all this wheat and stop eating these processed foods? Well, we do hear experts saying
00:12:32.560 that. But you know what our experts haven't said? Stop eating this shit. It's poison.
00:12:39.600 But on the internet, we say that, right? Where's your nutritionist who says,
00:12:45.200 no, don't ever eat ice cream? No, one Diet Coke a week is not good for you. Zero is the right number.
00:12:53.600 Right? No. I would say that even though there's a, there's more of a Venn, you know, crossover in this
00:13:00.000 case, I would say the public is way ahead of the science on nutrition and probably has been for a long
00:13:06.480 time. Probably has been. Um, they we've, there's also a study that says that, uh, the fewer calories
00:13:17.120 you eat, the longer you live. So that just came out to which everybody on the internet said, um,
00:13:24.720 you've been telling us that for what, 20 or 30 years. That's one of the oldest, most well-known
00:13:30.480 scientific facts that if you starve mice, as long as they're not starved to death, they live longer.
00:13:36.880 We all knew that. You know how else I knew it without any science? I've never seen a fat 80 year old.
00:13:46.320 And we're done. How much science do you need if you've never seen a fucking fat 80 year old?
00:13:52.000 Do you have to really wonder if the weight is going to kill you? Obviously you've never even seen
00:13:58.720 a fat 80 year old, which brings me to Dick Van Dyke who just got a Emmy at the age of 98,
00:14:05.360 which is awesome. How fat is 98 year old Dick Van Dyke? Not at all. He has zero fat on him
00:14:12.640 and he's 98. Is it a coincidence? Nope.
00:14:18.480 Because if he were 300 pounds, he wouldn't be with us winning any Emmys at age 98.
00:14:23.520 So if the public has been a head of science and all those things, which I think you'd agree with me,
00:14:31.840 what about the public's view on climate change? Now, when I say the public, I mean,
00:14:38.000 sort of the, the people on X that I interact with, they've been saying climate change is sketchy for
00:14:44.240 a long time. Do you think they're right? Of course they are. Of course they are. I don't
00:14:49.600 know if the warm planet's getting warmer. That's, you know, separate question from whether the science
00:14:54.480 is BS. The science is definitely BS, but maybe the, maybe at the same time, coincidentally,
00:15:00.400 the earth is getting warmer, but the, the, the climate models are absurd. How long will it take
00:15:07.760 before science tells you, you know, we can't really do anything with this number of variables?
00:15:12.960 You can't, you can't really figure out what's happening in the future. Nobody can tell the
00:15:16.960 future. Yeah. It'll take a few years, but they'll get there. And about election denial. So the experts
00:15:25.440 are telling us that the election had to be clean because every time somebody took something to court,
00:15:32.240 they were rejected for a cause for, you know, usually standing or something like that. So
00:15:38.640 the people who are the smart people are telling us that you can know something doesn't exist
00:15:43.600 via the process of not looking for it. Now that sounds ridiculous, but it's something that no regular
00:15:50.480 person thinks is true. Only the experts say it. All the people on TV, the ones who are telling us
00:15:56.560 what's true. Yeah. We, we know there's, there's no rigging because we didn't look for it.
00:16:02.240 Now I'm exaggerating a little bit, but not a lot. That's basically what's happening. So I think the
00:16:10.720 public's going to be ahead on election security and climate change and already ahead on all those other
00:16:17.200 things. And right now, this is amazing. Just try to wrap your head around this next story in the context
00:16:29.360 of what I just told you. This is a new story. I swear to God, this is today.
00:16:36.080 US doctors are coordinating to look into if the unusual spike in cancer after the pandemic is
00:16:43.520 caused by the vaccinations. To which few say, wait a minute, what? Are you only just now thinking that
00:16:51.840 the excess deaths need to be looked into in the context of the vaccinations?
00:16:57.120 That's something that the general public has been screaming about for the whole time.
00:17:03.360 And the doctors are just like, you know what? I've got an idea. Why don't we look into whether
00:17:09.040 the vaccinations are causing any of this excess deaths? What is wrong with the world that the,
00:17:15.360 the experts are just consistently way behind the public?
00:17:18.320 And so they're banding together to research that. Okay. Here's what I'd like to know.
00:17:30.720 I have an alternative hypothesis. I do think the vaccinations causing excess deaths hypothesis
00:17:37.920 is a strong hypothesis. I would consider it not proven largely because I don't believe any data that I
00:17:44.720 ever see about the pandemic. Um, but I wouldn't be surprised. I mean, it's well within the top three
00:17:53.520 possibilities of what's going on, right? One possibility is that the data is wrong. You know,
00:17:59.920 maybe there's something about how we counted things before the pandemic that changed. I don't know.
00:18:06.400 Maybe, but let me, let me offer another, um,
00:18:10.240 another possibility that I haven't seen anybody else mentioned. I think that when the food supply was at
00:18:18.560 risk and it looked like the food supply was going to collapse, I think either farmers got more creative
00:18:27.840 or the government made them be more creative in doing whatever they could to boost production because
00:18:33.680 it looked like we'd have a problem. One of those things that boosts production is using a, a weed killer.
00:18:42.640 So you kill the wheat. So it, I guess that dries it out faster so you can harvest it faster.
00:18:47.760 So instead of just letting the wheat, you know, grow its normal way and then getting it when it's ready,
00:18:53.280 they sort of kill it with weed killer. So there's ready earlier.
00:18:57.920 Now, some say that that weed killer is the reason that you can't eat wheat in the United States without
00:19:02.800 inflammation and other problems. But if you went to Europe where they don't do that,
00:19:07.360 you won't have that problem. Now, knowing what I know about just the way systems and governments and
00:19:14.480 businesses work, don't you think there was pressure from the government on farmers, at least the big
00:19:21.600 farmers to make sure that they did everything they could do and maybe even bend some, bend some rules.
00:19:28.720 Maybe they, maybe they got permission to use more of that. Maybe they went a little hard on it
00:19:34.560 because they could maybe. So I would look into the, any change in the food supply that happened at the
00:19:41.200 same time as the pandemic, because we know our food is killing us. So if something changed because of the
00:19:47.760 supply uncertainty, which would be a normal thing to expect, supply uncertainty should cause you to
00:19:55.680 loosen up your restrictions to make sure you have supply because that would seem like a bigger
00:20:00.400 priority than, you know, maybe there's some problem with the supply.
00:20:03.280 just a hypothesis. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.
00:20:12.560 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming
00:20:17.920 experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is
00:20:23.280 fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best
00:20:28.880 slots and top-tier table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and
00:20:34.160 jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino.
00:20:40.400 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the
00:20:45.280 thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can
00:20:50.720 go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600.
00:20:59.600 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See GoldenNuggetCasino.com
00:21:05.280 for details. Please play responsibly. Well, I've said provocatively that all the smart people who don't
00:21:10.880 have TDS now support Trump. I'll give you some examples. You got your David Sachs, your Chamath,
00:21:16.960 Paulette, your Elon Musk, your Russell Brand. What do they all have in common? Used to be Democrats.
00:21:23.680 What else do they have in common? They're the smart ones. They're the ones who are not drawn entirely by
00:21:30.480 picking a side. They're the ones who can look at a startup and say, this is a good investment or not.
00:21:37.360 They're the logical ones. And I was thinking to myself, okay, I keep hearing all these examples,
00:21:43.440 you know, Bill Ackman, one of the Blackstone people, some other, a couple other VCs have
00:21:50.240 recently come on board. Yeah, those are just the ones they mentioned. I mean, when Sachs did his big
00:21:56.400 fundraiser in San Francisco, of all places, for Trump, he had a huge turnout and sold out. And the
00:22:03.360 people there were there to donate to Trump. And he would be, he would have been picking from the
00:22:09.680 richest, smartest people in Silicon Valley. Now, you're going to say to me, but Scott,
00:22:16.080 it works both ways. It's not just people who have been lifelong Democrats. And by the way,
00:22:21.200 I'm one of those. I'm a lifelong Democrat who I can't even consider voting for Biden. That would be
00:22:28.160 ridiculous. But people say, but it must work both ways, right? Surely there are people who are
00:22:35.600 Republicans who are now all in for Biden. For example, there's Anthony Scaramucci.
00:22:46.320 So Anthony Scaramucci, who got fired in his first week from the White House, I'm not sure I'm going to
00:22:53.760 count somebody who got fired by the person he doesn't want to vote for. Right? If somebody fires
00:22:59.280 you, your odds of voting for them go way down. So it's always like a special case. When you see a
00:23:06.320 Republican defecting to vote Democrat, you're like, I think maybe there's something else going on there.
00:23:12.880 But when you see the Democrats defect to being Trump supporters, at least for now,
00:23:18.800 that's not based on emotion. That's based on analysis. And it's going to be harder and harder to
00:23:26.480 miss that all the smart people are on the same side. Now, if you have a counter example, I'd love to
00:23:34.400 see it. For example, is Rob Reiner one of the smart people? No. Is Stephen King one of the smart people?
00:23:42.960 Well, based on his posting on X, no. So there are plenty of people who are famous who don't like
00:23:51.280 Trump. But how many of them would you say are objectively smart? Now, there are a whole bunch
00:23:57.680 of smart people that you think might vote Democrat, but they're kind of quiet, kind of quiet. Let me pick
00:24:05.600 one. Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett, lifelong Democrat. Has he been talking about how much
00:24:13.360 he loves Biden and you better vote for him? I don't think I've heard that. No. Now, he's not super
00:24:20.080 political. So that's not it's not unusual that he wouldn't. But if you if you talk to Warren Buffett
00:24:26.320 behind closed doors, who do you think he supports? Who do you think? Now, I don't know. But there's
00:24:36.640 nobody smart. That I'm aware of literally nobody. Smart supporting him. Now, I say that partly to be
00:24:50.320 provocative. Because it'll cause people to say, what about this person? And what about that person?
00:24:58.240 But I want to have that conversation. If I'm wrong, I'd actually like to know that that would change my
00:25:03.440 thinking a little bit. If I found out that the people that I thought were the smartest people
00:25:09.680 were on the other side for me, I usually change my mind. If Alan Dershowitz disagreed with me,
00:25:16.080 I'd think about that hard. But he doesn't. Smart, lifelong Democrat? Nope.
00:25:26.000 How do I make that stop? I'm getting birthday wishes during the show, and that's going to be a
00:25:31.920 problem. All right. What about Bill Maher? Now, Bill Maher, I consider smart. I know that if we want
00:25:38.560 to be political, you like to think everybody who disagrees with you is dumb. But he's clearly smart.
00:25:43.840 However, he has the worst case of TDS any of us have ever seen. So that goes to my point. That if
00:25:52.400 you're smart and not having a mental problem, or you weren't personally fired by him, you're all on
00:25:59.520 the same side now. You really are. The exceptions are as funny as the ones that are more clear, I guess.
00:26:08.720 So here's something that Bill Maher said on the show. He said, Trump is winning on the border.
00:26:14.400 But he pointed out that that doesn't make sense. He acted like the Republicans are being irrational
00:26:20.320 for supporting Trump on the border because he says it was Trump's big issue and he failed to build the
00:26:26.080 wall. And that was his signature thing. So smart guy, Bill Maher, thinks it makes sense to say
00:26:34.240 that he doesn't understand why they would vote for Trump when he didn't get this done the first time.
00:26:42.320 Bill, do you know why it didn't get done the first time?
00:26:45.600 That was the Democrats that stopped it. It wasn't the Republicans. Bill, you do this for a living.
00:26:55.440 How can you say that was Trump's fault? Now, if you were to say, but why would it be different this
00:27:01.040 time? Well, I don't know that it'll be different this time, but I know that John Fetterman might vote
00:27:06.320 for the fucking wall. Do you hear me? I'm pretty sure that what seemed like a crazy wall idea to
00:27:15.760 all Democrats before now sounds like a much better idea suddenly, doesn't it? Doesn't that wall idea
00:27:22.480 look pretty good now? So Bill, everything's changed toward the direction that would make it possible to
00:27:29.680 build the wall. You got one person who's balls to the wall on the wall. One person who tried to tear
00:27:36.240 it down, well, did, got rid of all the EOs. How is this a hard decision? And why are you confused,
00:27:44.800 Bill Maher, that any Republican would want the person who's going to try really, really hard to get it done
00:27:50.960 in a new environment in which it's probably possible now? Is that a clear-headed analysis by him?
00:28:00.000 It's not. It's crazy. But he limits his crazy to just like this domain, because this obviously
00:28:08.640 feels personal in some way, I guess. But he does say, he says, I know Biden has a bad memory,
00:28:18.880 but he can't expect the American people to forget four years of calling Trump's border policies and
00:28:23.360 wall a racist, and four years of tearing down Trump's border policies for more migrant-friendly
00:28:28.320 policies. So he's, at least Bill Maher understands that the border needs to be closed, right? Again,
00:28:36.560 he's a smart person. He just has this weird TDS about Trump. All right, I'm going to do the last
00:28:42.880 smart person who favors Trump. You ready? Here's a quote from Putin. Putin said, and he's talking
00:28:52.080 about the lawfare against Trump. He says, it is obvious all over the world that the prosecution
00:28:57.440 of Trump is simply the utilization of the judicial system during an internal political struggle.
00:29:03.680 There are supposed leadership in the sphere of democracy is being burned to the ground.
00:29:07.680 God, I wish we had a president who could talk as well as our enemy.
00:29:21.440 Do you think Putin summed it up pretty well there? Yeah, he did. Is he our enemy, so we should be
00:29:29.440 careful what he says? Yes, yes. Of course, he says things for effect, not just because he thinks they're
00:29:35.200 true. So you don't want to side with Putin here. I don't want to become a Russian puppet. But do you
00:29:43.360 think that other leaders are having maybe similar thoughts? How could they not? How could any leader
00:29:52.080 in any civilized country be looking at what's happening here and have any thought that that's
00:29:57.840 anything but the end of democracy? Or at least, you know, a body blow? Yeah, we all see it now.
00:30:10.320 All right.
00:30:14.480 I wonder why I can't turn that off.
00:30:16.160 If you're watching the show, please don't. Please don't message me right now. I'm using my phone
00:30:30.560 for the show. All right. So this Just the News is reporting, the website Just the News. There's a
00:30:41.280 federal court in Texas that ordered the Department of Agriculture to stop discriminating against farmers
00:30:47.760 on the basis of race and sex when awarding disaster relief.
00:30:55.120 Now, it wasn't long ago when you saw this story, you would think, whoa, they're really discriminating
00:31:00.720 against, you know, black farmers and, you know, maybe LGBTQ farmers or something. But it's the opposite.
00:31:07.920 They were doing their disaster relief specifically targeted toward black farmers. Now, there was a
00:31:13.920 there was a historical justification. So it's sort of in the reparations domain. There is some history
00:31:23.120 of black farmers being totally screwed by the government. So I think that's a real thing, historically,
00:31:29.280 that the black farmers were totally screwed. So I think this was a an attempt to compensate for that.
00:31:36.640 But it's racist. Because the white farmers aren't getting
00:31:45.360 emergency aid, disaster relief. Since when do we do disaster relief based on race?
00:31:52.320 That's so wrong. Even though I get the justification, I get the justification. And they're probably living
00:32:00.800 people who are, you know, were impacted by that discrimination of the past. So that's a real
00:32:06.800 thing. I take that seriously. But no, you don't deny disaster relief to white people in the modern times
00:32:13.120 to make up for that. There's got to be something else, but not that. So anyway,
00:32:21.600 I feel like there that white people, white men especially, are living through this weird period of
00:32:28.480 discrimination that doesn't have a label. Like we say, it's wokeness and DEI. But it needs some kind of
00:32:37.040 like a Jim Crow kind of a name, you know, where everybody's like, ah, that's Jim Crow's situation.
00:32:43.760 But it needs, I think I'd call it the Scott Adams situation. Jim Crow's taken.
00:32:48.960 Jim Crow, by the way, I believe was a minstrel character who acted stereotypically, you know, racist,
00:32:59.440 black. So that's, that's where that law came from. Or that's where the, the name for the law came from.
00:33:06.800 Anyway, Don Lemon had a podcast with Sam Harris. And I recommend it. It was really interesting,
00:33:16.880 especially one part where Don Lemon was arguing that there's, you know, massive discrimination
00:33:23.120 against black people still in this country. And you can see it easily by the few black CEOs.
00:33:31.120 Sam Harris said, um, we actually live in a, I'm paraphrasing of course, in a time where it's
00:33:37.520 a gigantic advantage to be a black person applying for a job. And he had to explain it to Don Lemon.
00:33:43.840 And I don't think Don Lemon had ever heard it before. So he'd been living in a country where
00:33:48.880 he thought that he was being discriminated against for 30 years when it had been aggressively the
00:33:54.160 opposite for 30 years and never noticed. Well, I noticed when I kept losing all my jobs.
00:34:02.160 Are there any white men who've noticed in the last 30 years that the system is aggressively
00:34:08.560 against white men and any white men who've maybe noticed, but Don Lemon didn't know that.
00:34:16.320 What was his job? I believe his job was to tell you the news and he didn't know probably the biggest
00:34:23.360 dynamic in the corporate world that white men were being passed over for 30 years for promotion.
00:34:30.080 He didn't know that.
00:34:30.800 So Sam Harris did a good job of dismantling that belief, um, while he stood there, just
00:34:38.720 sort of not knowing how to respond. And I thought that was really amazing. So remember,
00:34:46.320 I told you that all the smart people are pro Trump, unless they have TDS.
00:34:52.640 Is Sam Harris a smart person? Yes. Yes. You can say whatever you want about his Trump stuff,
00:34:59.280 because that's pure TDS. We all see it. You don't have to be a professional. You don't need a degree
00:35:04.880 in psychology to watch Sam, Sam Harris talk and to know that there's something going on there that's
00:35:11.680 outside the realm of reason. But in every other realm, he's often the smartest guy in the room. So
00:35:22.560 even when there's an exception, the exception has the obvious reason for it, which is TDS. But all the
00:35:28.400 smart people who don't have TDS are on the same side at this point. All right, here's something
00:35:33.440 that you're not going to like, but I finally figured out how to say it. So you'll be a little
00:35:37.600 less bad. I saw the end wokeness account who I recommend very much. I retweet his stuff and talk
00:35:44.480 about it all the time. End wokeness is the name of the account. If you follow me and you're also an ex,
00:35:52.720 you definitely want to follow that account. It's just one of the most high value accounts.
00:35:57.440 End wokeness, all one word. Anyway, you've shown some statistics. And if you were to rank
00:36:05.600 what demographics have the highest percentage of single parents, according to this statistic,
00:36:12.480 black families, 64% of them have a single parent, Latino 42, white 24, Asian 16.
00:36:19.760 And that matches up perfectly with incarceration rates. They follow that same pattern. But it also
00:36:28.320 is, and it also follows the inverse by income. So the more likely you are to have two parents,
00:36:35.840 the higher your income, the more likely to have one parent, the more likely you're in jail.
00:36:40.240 So here's my point. The implication of this is that marriage is so strongly correlated with success
00:36:59.920 that people should get married more, right? Does that make sense to you? How many of you would you
00:37:05.760 agree if we have the clearest, clear signal that married people, they live longer? They actually
00:37:12.320 live longer. They have better health, more income, less jail, just everything. The numbers are
00:37:20.240 overwhelmingly obvious every time it's been measured. So therefore we should encourage more
00:37:25.040 marriage. Do you agree? How many would agree with the statement we should encourage more marriage
00:37:30.560 because it's so correlated with success? Oh, I've primed you too well. You're too good.
00:37:40.320 I think now you're all the smart ones. You're the smart ones. You're the elite now.
00:37:45.840 Yeah. Here's what's wrong with it. Let me give you some other examples that sound like this to my mind.
00:37:53.680 It's better to be tall because tall people earn more money and have more mating options.
00:38:00.240 Therefore, we should encourage people to be taller.
00:38:05.120 Are you good with that? Now you're going to say to me, but Scott, that's not practical.
00:38:10.400 A person can't just get taller. That's my point. That's my point. Let me take another way you maybe
00:38:19.760 could understand why the people who are the single parents also have the lowest income and things are
00:38:27.280 going wrong. Don't you think there's a correlation between who you'd want to marry and who you'd be
00:38:34.720 willing to hire? Tell me those aren't the same thing. You can't. It's the same sorting. It's the
00:38:43.120 same filter. I mean, not exactly the same, but the Venn diagram is pretty overlapping.
00:38:50.000 Isn't the most reasonable thing you could ever believe. Let me put it in funnier terms. You'll
00:38:57.200 remember it if I put it in the joke. If nobody wants to marry you, who the wants to hire you?
00:39:06.400 Am I right? And I'm going to add another thing. Do you know why people are single?
00:39:12.880 Do you think they chose it? Do you think they chose to be single? No. Let me speak from
00:39:19.120 personal experience as a single person. I'm single because nobody wants to marry me.
00:39:24.240 It wasn't my choice. It was a choice of approximately three and a half billion women.
00:39:32.320 They all got together and decided, no, thanks. Don't want any of that. Now I'm exaggerating a
00:39:38.000 little bit. I'm sure I could find somebody in the bush in some remote country who didn't know enough
00:39:44.480 about me. No, the obvious correlation is that there's something wrong with the individuals.
00:39:53.200 Not genetic and not cultural. I'm just saying there's something wrong, but it doesn't have to do with
00:40:03.680 that marriage is good or marriage is bad. My take is this. Marriage is the best system for about 25% of
00:40:11.360 the public. If they're lucky enough to find that one great person. Have you seen the on social media,
00:40:18.400 there are all these people doing really the same content in which they say, all right,
00:40:23.760 women all say they want a guy over six feet tall and makes six figures and blah, blah, blah. And then
00:40:29.600 they do the math and they find that the number of men who are single and the right marriageable age
00:40:35.120 and over six feet tall and have that income ends up to be like 1% or some crazy number.
00:40:44.400 And that's before you add drug addict.
00:40:48.560 It's before you add personality. It's before you add mental illness.
00:41:00.160 Right? So we've created a world where we're completely unhappy with each other,
00:41:06.640 which doesn't have to do with your genes or your culture. We've individually become terrible.
00:41:11.760 And I'm not saying, you know, sometimes you hear me say that women have gotten worse,
00:41:18.080 but so have men. I mean, I don't know how you'd compare the two in their worseness,
00:41:23.040 but we have individually become unfuckable and unmarriageable. All of us. We're all unmarriageable.
00:41:31.600 And part of it is weight. Part of it is we're on our phones. Part of it is we all have mental illness
00:41:37.120 from our phones. Part of it is we don't seem to have as, or we don't feel like we have as much
00:41:42.320 economic opportunity. We've just become people that nobody wants to marry. So just telling us
00:41:48.720 that marriage is a better deal than being single won't do anything. It's like telling you to be tall.
00:41:53.680 What do I do about it? So I agree with you. Having a perfect partner in a long-term relationship,
00:42:01.600 best thing going. And I see all the relationship experts saying stuff like,
00:42:07.920 your number one decision, the best thing you have to get right is your marriage. Because you want the
00:42:13.760 person who's loyal forever and is definitely rooting for you to succeed and all that.
00:42:22.400 I was watching another marriage expert. So here's the battle of the dueling marriage experts.
00:42:27.680 One expert saying your most important thing is to find a woman who supports you and is your
00:42:33.200 greatest supporter. Because if you get divorced, you wrecked forever, basically.
00:42:38.800 At the same time, another relationship expert, a woman, said that she didn't used to believe that
00:42:45.200 women would try to destroy the success of their own partner. But now she does, because it's just too
00:42:52.160 obvious. So her view is that women try to tear down their partner so their partner won't feel too good
00:43:00.240 about themselves and find another partner. That in other words, the natural way of marriage is for the
00:43:06.240 woman to fatten up her husband so he can't get another girlfriend, to tell him he's trash, and to make sure
00:43:14.320 that he thinks he can't do better. Now, I've heard that husbands can do the same things to their wives.
00:43:21.040 But we've created a civilization and a set of whole bunch of different variables within our society
00:43:31.120 that make marriage a really bad idea, but only because it made people bad. We're just not the
00:43:37.840 same people we used to be. And on top of that, since we see all the Instagrammers and the beautiful people,
00:43:46.640 we think, my goodness, can I do better than that? I've been looking at these these hotties all day
00:43:51.360 long and then I go to the mall and I don't see them. Where are they?
00:43:58.640 And that, ladies and gentlemen, brings me to all except one thing you wanted me to mention,
00:44:05.600 which is there's a story about a juror on the the Trump trial. It looks like maybe my notes didn't
00:44:12.800 all print out. It seemed a little short today because I know that was on my notes, but disappeared.
00:44:20.880 So I believe that that's a hoax. I believe it's a hoax.
00:44:27.520 Has that been confirmed yet? So the idea was that Judge Mershon became aware that there was a social
00:44:33.840 media Facebook post from some stranger who said they were the cousin of a jurist and that the jurist
00:44:40.320 indicated they'd made up a decision before the jury was over, which means they would have talked to
00:44:44.240 him about it, which would have been a mistrial, which would have been a free trial, free Trump.
00:44:49.120 But the person involved appears to be a famous shit poster and there doesn't seem to be any
00:44:56.720 substance to it. So if you're getting excited about that, I'd say tone that down a little bit.
00:45:02.160 Tone it down a little bit. I feel like. How did all those notes disappear?
00:45:15.280 Oh, there's a. Oh, yeah, here's some other stuff.
00:45:19.440 So Jake Paul and Mike Tyson had their fight rescheduled. I guess Tyson had some medical stuff.
00:45:26.080 You had to delay the fight. So it's late until November 15th. And the way Tyson posted it, he said,
00:45:34.400 there's a new date for Jake's wake, new date for Jake's wake. Well, why do I why do I like Mike Tyson?
00:45:43.760 Why does everybody seem to like Mike Tyson? He's sort of the ultimate bad guy. I mean, he's done bad
00:45:49.760 things. You beat up people for a living and sometimes for fun. And, you know, I won't get
00:45:55.200 into the other accusations, but there is something. There's just something sympathetic about him
00:46:03.440 that I can't put my finger on because I I'm also fascinated by him. He's always been one of my
00:46:09.200 favorite public personalities. And I, you know, I never felt proud of that because he's done some bad
00:46:15.920 stuff. But I do like watching him and I'll probably watch this fight. It's going to be on Netflix,
00:46:20.880 November 15. Well, there's a 90 year old pilot, William Anders. He was one of the astronauts. He took
00:46:30.560 the famous Earthrise photo back in whenever he was on Apollo 8 and he crashed his plane.
00:46:37.760 Wait, he was flying a plane at 90 and he crashed it. So we don't know the details of that, but I don't
00:46:53.280 think maybe he should have been flying the plane at 90. I don't know. I don't know how that works.
00:46:58.720 Does anybody take your license away?
00:47:00.400 Yeah. Yeah. And the video, it looked like I couldn't tell from the video because it's a video
00:47:07.120 of him hitting the water and what looks like a lake or a harbor or something. And it looked like
00:47:12.960 he might have been attempting a loop or something and it didn't work out. Was he doing a trick?
00:47:20.560 It looked like he was maybe trying to do a trick and it didn't work. Or maybe he lost some power and
00:47:26.080 couldn't couldn't recover in time. But when he hit the water, he was trying to come back up.
00:47:31.200 He just got too low. Probably overweight, somebody says. Well, I'll bet you he wasn't fat
00:47:39.200 because he was 90. Have you heard about the trans whistleblower? He's not trans. He's rather a
00:47:47.600 doctor, Eaton Heim. And so he blew the whistle on a Texas Children's Hospital that is doing secret
00:47:57.280 sex change programs. Meaning secret from the parents. I think that's what that meant.
00:48:05.120 And he blew the whistle on him. Public was outraged. And of course, the Biden administration
00:48:10.480 immediately sent their goons to arrest him. Now, I think what he's being arrested for is violating,
00:48:18.400 I don't know, some health care or HIPAA confidentiality or something. But again,
00:48:23.920 I don't think the general public sees it as anything but lawfare against people they don't like.
00:48:29.200 I don't think that his arrest is legitimate. He might have broken some laws, technically.
00:48:38.000 But it looks like bullshit to me. So he's got to he's got to go fund me. You might want to think
00:48:44.160 about that. All right. Oh, yeah, there's my note about the troll.
00:48:51.920 Trump was talking about his successful fundraising with David Sachs and the folks in San Francisco.
00:48:59.280 But the way he describes it in his Trumpian way, has anybody reached this determination yourself,
00:49:07.520 that things that seem too far when Trump came on the scene, it's like that's too much bragging
00:49:13.360 or that's that's too much exaggeration. It now just seems funny and quaint and just part of his personality.
00:49:21.920 The wilder the things he says, as long as they're within within the Trump framework, you know,
00:49:28.240 things that Trump says, I love all of them. Yeah, I just love it when he stretches reality.
00:49:34.720 But this this is like a beauty. This is the most Trumpian. This is the Trumpiest Trumpy
00:49:41.920 you'll ever get. So he's talking about that fundraiser. And of course, it was all the
00:49:45.760 the smartest people in Silicon Valley. And he goes, quote, these are brilliant guys, AI guys.
00:49:52.000 So, yeah, Trump, Trump, not only, you know, it's no surprise for his age, of course,
00:50:06.240 but he's not like a technology savant or anything. But the way he simplifies, he's the best simplifier
00:50:16.880 of all time. These are brilliant guys, AI guys. And they're not really even AI guys.
00:50:24.800 You know that everybody's everybody at that level's got some investments in AI.
00:50:28.800 I'm not sure they're AI guys. Anyway.
00:50:33.360 He says, these are the guys that are doing all the things you read about.
00:50:37.040 He's so funny. And they're doing all the things you read about, which is true.
00:50:47.840 And they says he was talking to Fox News Digital, I guess. These are just a brilliant group of people.
00:50:54.080 It gets better. Hold on. This is just a brilliant group of people. And they can't relate to Biden
00:50:58.800 because he is a stupid person. And I have a high IQ. We don't need to fact check this one. Can we just enjoy it?
00:51:14.960 For the poetry that it is. I swear to God. And Trump should get a Nobel Prize in literature just for his,
00:51:23.760 just for the way he talks. Now, I don't know why it's so funny.
00:51:32.240 But, so last night I was flipping through the channels and decided to watch an old Seinfeld episode.
00:51:43.440 And I found myself laughing at a TV show for the first time in years, years. I can't remember the
00:51:50.960 last time I laughed out loud, like actually holding my gut at a TV show or a movie. Can you remember the
00:51:58.800 last time that happened? I don't. I can't. It's years. So I go back and look at this old show that
00:52:04.720 should have been extinct. You know, it should have timed out in terms of our appreciation of it.
00:52:10.560 Just a random episode. And, and I'm actually convulsed. I'm convulsing. I'm laughing so hard.
00:52:17.760 But here's the thing. If I looked at the dialogue on paper, you know, I was watching it as a writer,
00:52:23.760 you know, putting my writer filter on it. And I was imagining reading those same lines on paper.
00:52:29.680 They wouldn't really be that funny. I don't know why that thing is so funny,
00:52:34.640 but it's the same thing that Trump does. There's something about that Trump never says anything that
00:52:42.160 isn't Trump that makes it just so delicious. Like he's never talking the way you talk because that's
00:52:50.240 the way you talk. He only talks the way he talks and I could watch it all day long. But on Seinfeld,
00:52:57.760 the characters and the writing, um, even though a lot of it was like relatable,
00:53:02.640 you'd have little situations to go, Oh, that happens to me too. The way they talked and acted
00:53:07.760 wasn't like anybody talks or acts in the real world. And so it's that, that weirdness that
00:53:15.680 they never talked and acted like real people in the real world. Yet it was an exaggerated version
00:53:20.880 where they're extra selfish and stuff like that. It's just such a good formula. So, so funny.
00:53:27.280 But I think Trump's got a little of that magic as well. And then also, uh, Arizona attorney general is
00:53:35.440 going to go after, uh, the governor. So I believe they're both Democrats, but the governor is, uh,
00:53:43.280 Katie Hopkins is accused of taking bribes. Well, that would be a big surprise. We found out that
00:53:50.960 somebody was taking, taking bribes. Oh yeah, there's, I missed, I missed the best part of the show
00:54:00.800 because I missed this note. All right. I hope you stayed after I acted like I was done. The best part of
00:54:08.080 the show is, is this. You ready? Uh, first of all, let's talk about Nicole Wallace on, uh, MSNBC.
00:54:17.680 Steven Guest on X was calling this out and, uh, he notes that, uh, Nicole Wallace, before she was
00:54:24.720 on MSNBC, she was Bush's White House communications person. And then, uh, and then she was communicating,
00:54:32.240 oh, White House, then, uh, when Alito was confirmed to the Supreme Court, and then she went on some
00:54:40.240 deranged screed against justices Alito and Thomas today, according to Steve Guest. But here's what she
00:54:46.320 said, quote, the irreversible harm from the United States Supreme Court could do to the country and
00:54:52.320 democracy if they, the court, decides that the disgraced ex-president is indeed above the law.
00:54:59.360 The threat is compounded by Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who have personal ties to the attempted
00:55:05.200 overthrow of our government. That's the news.
00:55:13.520 That's the news. None of that shit's true. Let's, let's go through this.
00:55:21.840 There will be irreversible harm if the courts find that Trump is above the law.
00:55:26.880 Is that really the question? Do you think the court's deciding if Trump personally is above the law?
00:55:34.080 No, they're talking about presidential immunity, but presidential immunity has existed forever.
00:55:40.000 So that's just crazy, bullshit, propaganda stuff. And then when she says it's compounded by Clarence
00:55:47.200 Thomas and Samuel Alito, having personal ties to the attempted overthrow of our government,
00:55:52.800 there was no attempted overthrow of the government. That is fake news. I sure hope to God the fake
00:56:00.800 news doesn't turn into fake history. Oh wait, here's the next story. As Joshua Lysak pointed out,
00:56:07.680 you saw a story in the Smithsonian. It's a magazine. The Smithsonian. You know the Smithsonian that
00:56:14.800 is a repository is a repository of our history. And he opened up the history book and he learned that
00:56:23.920 the history says that Donald Trump, quote, packed the courts and committed an insurrection. That's in
00:56:31.600 the Smithsonian document, the history of our country. Yep. He packed the courts, meaning that he
00:56:40.640 put people on the court. That's not what packed the court means. Pack the court means adding extra
00:56:48.880 people so the court is bigger and then packing it. So that's the wrong word. Number two,
00:56:57.920 he didn't commit an insurrection. What court found that he did an insurrection? I didn't see one. It
00:57:07.840 wasn't an attempted insurrection because there were no tools by which he could attempt an insurrection.
00:57:13.920 I haven't gotten to the good part yet.
00:57:18.000 Good part. The good part's coming. It's coming real soon.
00:57:23.520 All right. Just hold that thought. Just hold the thought that the current news is fake,
00:57:30.080 which means that our history will all be fake. We know that there's no way around it. It's already
00:57:37.520 written and it's already fake and you can see it in real time. Do you remember the story that Trump
00:57:45.600 requested the National Guard on January 6th? I'll need a little reminder here because I'm just pulling
00:57:52.880 from memory. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but my memory is that Trump, ahead of January 6th,
00:58:00.400 authorized up to, what, 10,000 National Guard to make sure that the Capitol was protected.
00:58:07.360 Am I correct so far? And that I believe it was Nancy Pelosi who said no. Am I correct so far?
00:58:15.680 Am I correct so far? Fact check? Fact check's okay? Now, we've always wondered why she would do that,
00:58:22.160 right? Because you say to yourself, oh, it's a setup. She said no to the National Guard
00:58:29.520 because that made it more likely there would be some bad behavior. Is that what you think?
00:58:37.200 Is that your current belief that the only reason she would say no to the National Guard
00:58:43.760 is because she wanted the trouble? I've never been completely happy with that answer
00:58:51.600 because people do lots of bad things, but you know what they don't usually do?
00:58:56.880 They don't usually say, let's take all the security away from my husband so somebody can hit him on the
00:59:02.480 head with a hammer. It doesn't usually go that way. People don't leave themselves unprotected,
00:59:10.480 unless you're, you know, juicy Smollett or something. But a normal politician doesn't put
00:59:17.520 themselves at great personal risk, you know, just to run an op. A normal person doesn't. So why would
00:59:25.360 she do that? If you think that she was running an op and, you know, making it look, well, I've got
00:59:30.880 another hypothesis for you. Try this one on. You ready to have your head rearranged?
00:59:41.040 This one's going to hurt for a little while. Now, this is just speculation,
00:59:47.920 and I'll take a fact check on it. So I will not assert this to be a fact.
00:59:51.920 There is some news reporting that General Milley feared that Trump would use the National Guard
01:00:01.760 as his private army to take over the country. Have you ever heard that? There was fear that Trump
01:00:12.240 maybe had some control over the National Guard and that he would use them to take over the country.
01:00:17.280 That's probably why they were declined.
01:00:24.240 Which would indicate that our top military guy
01:00:30.720 is as big a fucking idiot as he looks because I kept watching him perform on TV and I kept saying to
01:00:37.200 myself, I don't know. He looks like an idiot. It looks like there's just something wrong with him.
01:00:42.880 Like, it looks like he falls for every hoax. I believe that he genuinely believed that there
01:00:51.280 was an insurrection. I think he actually believed that the National Guard would maybe be somehow under
01:00:59.120 Trump's control and he didn't want to take the chance that there would be a military force big enough to
01:01:04.720 make a difference should they decide to be traitors. I think that the real story of January 6th is that
01:01:14.720 the Democrats hoaxed themselves so badly that they believed the ridiculous and then they acted on the
01:01:23.520 ridiculous. And then acting on the ridiculous, they were committed and they had to sell the whole bag of
01:01:30.640 ridiculousness. I think that the only reason there was trouble is that the National Guard was turned
01:01:37.040 down. And I think the only reason it was turned down is that Mark Milley was a fucking idiot who had
01:01:44.000 TDS and was literally hallucinating a risk that no reasonable person saw. Now, keep in mind that nobody's
01:01:52.720 even mentioned that risk until I just mentioned it right now, except that I saw a story that said he
01:01:58.160 might have been concerned about it. Now, how's your brain?
01:02:05.920 What did that do to you? Do you think that interpretation might be true? Because it is
01:02:12.320 the interpretation that explains all the facts. The ones we've had before were like, maybe, but
01:02:20.400 I don't know. I just don't see somebody saying no to security when security is so important.
01:02:25.440 Right? But this makes perfect sense. We do observe as a fact that people have hoaxed themselves into
01:02:33.840 believing that he's a monster. What did Carville say the other day? He's going to take away your
01:02:39.040 constitution. So now he's taken away your freedom. He's going to take away your democracy. He's going
01:02:44.880 to take away your republic and there'll never be another election that he's going to take away your
01:02:48.960 constitution. Does that sound like people who are in good mental health? Not to me. No, I do believe
01:02:56.480 that the people who start these memes and messages, they're probably just cynical and they know people
01:03:04.560 will believe it. But I think that somebody like Mark Milley just believes it. And I'm going to add to
01:03:10.560 this. Yeah. Now I'm going to tie two things together. Remember, remember Trump said something
01:03:18.480 like, you know, attacking the cartels militarily. He asked about it when he was in office, but he's
01:03:24.560 also talked about it after office. Now, why is it that he is the only one who's mentioned that
01:03:31.360 and prior presidents act like it's not even on the table? Well, my hypothesis is that our government has
01:03:38.080 been working with the cartels because it's how we control Central American governments.
01:03:44.080 We have to be on their side. So we can't attack them militarily because they're on our team.
01:03:49.920 And we just put up with the massive numbers of deaths because I believe our government,
01:03:55.040 I've never said this before, but I'm going to say it for the first time. I believe that the people
01:04:00.000 who are really in charge of our government think that the overdose deaths are the worthless people.
01:04:05.280 That's what I think. That's not my opinion. I think that the people who are not dealing with
01:04:12.480 the overdose deaths in the United States, the really deep state ones, the real, the ones who are
01:04:17.520 really in charge, you know, the dark arts people, I think they think the overdose deaths are just
01:04:22.560 junkies and they don't give a fuck. So they're like, well, if we kill the cartels, we're going to have
01:04:28.880 chaos in all of the Americas. If we let them kill 70,000, uh, useless people a year, we won't miss
01:04:37.920 them a bit. The economy might be better for it. The jails will be less full and there'll be fewer
01:04:44.480 people driving and killing people because they're inebriated. So fuck them.
01:04:50.480 Yeah. Because a lot of you have the same opinion. You've told me directly when I talk about my stepson
01:04:55.120 dying, when I talk about my stepson dying, the most common comment I get is, well, he had a comment
01:05:00.560 or, you know, that's his fault, or you should have done better in your parenting. Right? So it wouldn't
01:05:06.720 surprise me if the people who are in charge actually just don't even think that's a problem,
01:05:11.840 that it's just calling the herd. That's what I think. But here's the, here's the, uh, the payoff.
01:05:18.320 Why is it that only Trump wouldn't know that we're working with the cartels?
01:05:25.280 It's exactly what you think. Because the bad guys couldn't tell him because he wouldn't put up with
01:05:30.720 it. I believe that he was never briefed on the real intel. And John Brennan says directly that they
01:05:38.640 don't want to give Trump, uh, intel because they can't trust him with it. You know why you can't trust
01:05:43.920 Trump? And I basically, I agree with them. You can't trust him with the intel. Do you know why
01:05:48.240 you can't trust Trump with the intel? Because if we knew the truth, something would change and they
01:05:56.240 don't want that. The problem is he would change it. I don't think the problem is so much that he would,
01:06:03.600 you know, tell our secrets, although he might. I mean, I could, I could easily imagine Trump just
01:06:08.400 saying, you know what? It turns out we work with the cartels. You could actually imagine him saying
01:06:15.520 that the only person in the world who would do it. So I believe that Trump has been operating, uh,
01:06:22.320 in a crippled capacity because the CIA has not been his friend. I believe that the insurrection was
01:06:29.440 caused entirely by Mark Milley's TDS. And maybe, and maybe he worked with, uh, I I'm guessing that
01:06:36.480 when Nancy Pelosi said no to the, to the extra security, do you think she did that without
01:06:42.400 talking to anybody? Do you think she just said, well, I'm Nancy Pelosi. I know about security.
01:06:48.320 I'll just decide now. No, she almost certainly talked to people who know what they're doing.
01:06:54.480 And I'll betcha some of them had the Mark Milley opinion that if you bring in military,
01:06:59.680 they might side with Trump.
01:07:00.960 Do you think at that point they were worried that it would be obvious the election was stolen?
01:07:07.600 I believe so. I believe that the Democrats were worried that it was too obvious the election was
01:07:14.080 stolen. Do I have proof the election was stolen? No, not direct proof. I have indirect proof,
01:07:21.120 which is that the same bunch of people rigged everything they've touched. Every single thing
01:07:26.800 that same group of people have touched has been fake. Everything they've touched has been fake.
01:07:32.960 If you want to tell me this is the one thing that's not fake, I say, you're a fucking idiot.
01:07:38.240 All right. Well, let's be honest. If you still think, you know, the election was good,
01:07:43.040 as opposed to, you can't tell either way, which would be a reasonable thing to say.
01:07:47.200 If you say, you know, it was good. You're a fucking idiot at this point. You don't know how
01:07:51.760 anything works. You don't know that everything the same people, same people did. All of it's
01:07:57.920 fucking fake. All of it's fake. This isn't the one thing they did right. It's not. All right. So
01:08:11.200 history's fake. Four hostages got freed from Gaza. The IDF did an op and killed a bunch of people,
01:08:20.640 but got four hostages back and they seem to be in good shape. So that's good news. There's news that
01:08:25.760 NATO is preparing a land corridor for a possible land war in Europe against Russia. Can you name
01:08:32.880 anything dumber than planning a land war against a nuclear power? I really can't think of anything
01:08:42.160 that would be dumber than that. But military people have to do military planning. So you should not see
01:08:48.960 any kind of planning as anything that's like signaling what's going to happen.
01:08:54.080 Because if you're in the military and it's your job to plan for all contingencies, you don't say to
01:08:58.720 yourself, well, I think this one's, you know, terribly unlikely. No, you plan for them all.
01:09:05.520 Also be aware that we're in a psychological battle with Putin. So Putin's moving his warships to just do
01:09:12.720 a, you know, some naval exercise, but it's going to be close to the United States off of Cuba.
01:09:18.640 And then, you know, he talks about his nuclear weapons and how he might use them if so-and-so
01:09:24.880 happens. And then we, you know, we indicate that if this happens, that'll happen. So you might see
01:09:31.280 the planning for a land war as just part of the psychological battle. Because if Putin thinks
01:09:37.200 there's some chance that would control some of his urges, if he thought there was no chance,
01:09:44.720 because NATO wasn't even preparing for war, then he could act like NATO doesn't exist. So you should
01:09:51.680 see the planning as the fight. Not that it's an indication that there will be a fight later.
01:09:58.000 The planning is the fight. That's the psychological fight. Anyway, I have a theory that I'd like to tell
01:10:08.960 you about the simulation, because I keep hearing the same complaint. People say we couldn't possibly
01:10:15.120 be a simulation because you could never build a computer so powerful to simulate the universe.
01:10:20.560 Now, maybe you could, but let's take it as truth that you can never build one to simulate the universe.
01:10:28.080 That wouldn't matter because if you could build it to look as good as Roblox, do you know what that
01:10:33.360 is? Roblox, Roblox, the kids video game where the characters look like Legos. You know, everything's
01:10:41.120 made of squares. So if you see one of these like characters, it's just made of like Legos. You say to
01:10:49.280 yourself, well, that doesn't look like a real person. That looks like Legos. All right. Now let's say you
01:10:54.240 were a robot. And the robot has been trained on human behavior. And it sees a man made in Legos.
01:11:02.640 What's the robot say? Well, same as the people, because it's trained on people. So the robot says,
01:11:07.680 oh, that's not exactly a person. That's like a, some kind of, you know, creature made out of blocks.
01:11:15.120 But now take the robot and reprogram it. And you, you simply add this programming.
01:11:21.840 You will think you see something in detail, but really it's just going to be these blocks.
01:11:29.760 So if you were to describe it later, you would say, oh yeah, you had a mustache and looked like a
01:11:34.960 regular person and everything, but it won't actually be there. Yet you will just see all
01:11:39.760 the detail, but none will be there. When you walk into a room, you're only ever going to see the
01:11:45.040 little cone of your, of your concentration and all the rest you'll imagine you saw in detail,
01:11:51.680 but there wasn't any. Is that robot living in a simulation? Yes. The robot would reliably report
01:12:01.280 that it sees details and could even describe the details, could even draw a picture of the details,
01:12:06.560 but they wouldn't be there. So what I'm going to suggest, what I am suggesting is that the universe
01:12:13.520 could be run on a very small computer. As long as the characters in it, we're told that they see more
01:12:19.600 than they see. Now, could you, is there some breaking news?
01:12:30.880 Is it possible to the, in the real world, the one that we think we're in this one,
01:12:35.520 do we know that people imagine more detail than they see? Yes, that's well proven. Your actual
01:12:42.080 reality, your brain sees detail that isn't actually there. It's well understood. I don't need to get
01:12:50.240 into the details, but yeah, don't worry about processing. All you need is a line of code that
01:12:56.960 says you see the details. That's it. You see the details. The whole thing could be solved. You don't
01:13:03.520 need a computer that's bigger than the universe. You need a little one that just fools you into
01:13:08.160 thinking you see things you don't see because an optical illusion or simply BS is just always easier
01:13:16.240 to produce. Let me give you another one. How can you build a computer big enough that your memories,
01:13:23.360 my memories and everybody else's memories would stay consistent? Imagine how the complexity
01:13:30.240 of having all of civilization, billions of people and all of their histories have to match and line up
01:13:37.760 and be the same. That's not a problem. You know why? None of our history is real.
01:13:45.280 Even our personal memories don't line up. So the other day, somebody asked me what programming
01:13:53.840 language I used, you know, back when I was a young pup and doing some programming. I think I said basic
01:14:00.240 plus. And then yesterday, by weird coincidence, I was looking through some old videos and I saw myself
01:14:07.200 in the year I was using it, saying that it was quick basic. So I had a very clear memory of something
01:14:14.400 that didn't happen. And there are tons of examples of that. I've even had memories of things that I
01:14:22.240 thought happened to me that might have happened to my brother and vice versa. I've even changed the
01:14:27.520 character involved, right? So here's how that saves energy. Our histories don't have to match anymore.
01:14:35.600 You and I can watch the news and come away with different ideas of what history was.
01:14:39.360 We can we can write our history any way we want. And if somebody writes it differently,
01:14:44.560 we say they're lying. So you don't need any matching coordinated history. Because we just
01:14:52.160 imagine that we got the right one and everybody else is wrong. And it's one line of code.
01:14:57.600 It's one line of code for all of history. Your own version is fine. The other people are lying or have
01:15:03.920 bad memories. Boom. Done. All the memories now have been explained.
01:15:13.360 All right. That, in fact, is the end of the show. I'm going to say goodbye to
01:15:18.560 my wonderful people on X and YouTube and Rumble. If you missed the first part of the show,
01:15:25.440 you probably don't know that my new book has dropped, which is a combination of my two existing
01:15:30.320 books, which are both classics, God's Debris and The Religion War, plus a brand new short story that
01:15:37.360 completes the arc of the avatars. Available now on Amazon.
01:15:43.840 If it tells you the hardcover isn't available to December, that's a glitch. Go ahead and order it.
01:15:49.120 We'll fix that and you'll get your book in the normal amount of time that people get books.
01:15:53.840 All right. That's all we got for now. I hope I'm alive tomorrow and all the rest of you are too.
01:16:01.600 And I hope you have an amazing day. I'm going to talk privately to the
01:16:06.240 subscribers on Locals now. If you are subscribing on Locals and or on X where the Dilbert comic still
01:16:13.600 runs, you would know that Dilbert or Dogbert's a clone formed an army of felons to attack him.
01:16:20.640 But we wrap up that storyline today in case you're wondering how that ends.