Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2521 CWSA 06⧸29⧸24

00:00:00.400 I like coffee.

00:00:02.080 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit in the day.

00:00:04.760 I think it makes everything better.

00:00:05.720 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:06.900 It happens now.

00:00:08.060 Go.

00:00:12.700 Oh.

00:00:16.080 Wow.

00:00:18.600 All right, I've got a question for you.

00:00:21.020 A couple of science things, and then we're going to get to the fun.

00:00:24.880 Oh, my God, is the news fun this week.

00:00:28.000 Am I right?

00:00:28.600 Is everybody having as much fun as I am?

00:00:32.580 Honestly, I don't think I've ever had more fun just dealing with the news.

00:00:38.040 We'll talk about that.

00:00:39.480 But question for you.

00:00:41.160 Chinese researchers have figured out how to put a human stem cell brain on a chip.

00:00:49.480 So there's a little organic thing made in the stem cells that mimics some characteristics of a human brain.

00:00:56.400 And they combine it with a chip.

00:01:01.220 And they made a robot out of it.

00:01:04.200 Now, I need a ruling.

00:01:05.740 Because apparently it works.

00:01:08.760 It's not experimental.

00:01:10.040 It works.

00:01:11.300 If you build a robot that's part human brain, but had never been part of a human.

00:01:17.520 So they're just using stem cells and building their own little thing.

00:01:21.420 Is it a cyborg?

00:01:23.600 Cyborg, yes or no?

00:01:25.000 Part organic, part machine.

00:01:27.860 And it's a robot.

00:01:29.520 But it was never a human.

00:01:33.160 But it's got a human DNA in it.

00:01:37.040 Right?

00:01:37.540 Because stem cells.

00:01:39.100 So I'm going to say yes.

00:01:41.600 I'm going to say yes on cyborg.

00:01:43.500 Well, it looks like we have more yeses than those.

00:01:46.040 All right.

00:01:46.380 Good.

00:01:47.400 Here's a cool thing, according to live science.

00:01:50.820 Somebody has invented regular glasses that are night vision lenses.

00:01:55.380 So you would be wearing regular corrective lenses, apparently.

00:01:58.920 Or they don't have to be corrective.

00:02:02.040 And with no extra electronics, you might be able to see in the dark.

00:02:06.160 Now, I assume there has to be at least a little bit of light.

00:02:10.860 You know, not complete dark.

00:02:12.560 But how would that change things?

00:02:15.940 Could you imagine if everybody could just see in the dark?

00:02:19.460 I don't know.

00:02:19.800 I feel like that's when we got electric lights so you could work all night.

00:02:25.920 I mean, that changed civilization quite a bit.

00:02:28.440 What happens if you can see at night?

00:02:30.360 I don't know.

00:02:31.880 All right.

00:02:32.120 Here's some fake science for you.

00:02:33.460 69% of those surveyed say that cleaning the house, if your spouse or your partner cleans

00:02:40.700 the house, it's their biggest turn-on.

00:02:44.820 Yum.

00:02:46.220 I love it when you clean the house.

00:02:49.000 I am so aroused right now by watching my husband clean the house.

00:02:53.620 No.

00:02:54.600 No.

00:02:55.120 Young people.

00:02:56.720 Young people.

00:02:57.560 Men, I'm talking to you.

00:02:58.660 Young men, don't fall for this.

00:03:00.800 This is fake news.

00:03:02.000 Let me explain to you how this works.

00:03:06.700 I'm doing a survey, young one.

00:03:11.080 What would be the biggest turn-on for your husband or boyfriend?

00:03:17.960 Is he going to hear about this?

00:03:20.340 Well, I suppose so.

00:03:21.380 I mean, we're going to publish the results.

00:03:23.080 So my boyfriend's going to know what I said is my biggest turn-on.

00:03:29.500 Well, not you personally, but, you know, he'll look at the results.

00:03:34.740 I think my biggest turn-on is when he cleans the entire house while I'm doing nothing.

00:03:42.160 All right, well, write that down.

00:03:45.380 That sounds totally believable.

00:03:47.820 And I can't think of any ulterior motives.

00:03:50.680 So, yes, it's probably your biggest turn-on to watch your husband do chores while you're not doing anything.

00:03:57.840 No.

00:03:58.240 But, men, if you are asked what is your biggest turn-on, don't go with the old language of love stuff like,

00:04:08.940 oh, I like it when she does chores for me, or I like it when she buys me a present.

00:04:15.180 Don't fall for that.

00:04:16.780 Don't be a sucker.

00:04:18.040 The proper answer is, I like it when she blows me. 1.00

00:04:21.440 What's your language of love?

00:04:25.120 Blowing me.

00:04:26.640 No, seriously.

00:04:28.140 Is it acts of service?

00:04:31.980 No, it's blowing me.

00:04:34.220 No, but is it kind words?

00:04:38.020 No.

00:04:39.200 No, just blow me. 0.86

00:04:41.420 That's my language of love.

00:04:42.820 Blow me. 0.99

00:04:44.200 Fuck your science.

00:04:45.600 This is bullshit.

00:04:47.920 Men like it when you touch them.

00:04:49.600 And show them a little respect.

00:04:52.720 That's all.

00:04:54.140 We don't need this bullshit.

00:04:55.940 And, ladies, stop this bullshit like you're turned on by us doing the fucking dishes. 1.00

00:05:01.540 You're going to be looking for a boyfriend at the same time your husband is washing your goddamn dishes. 1.00

00:05:07.280 Stop this bullshit.

00:05:11.020 Come on.

00:05:12.780 All right.

00:05:13.180 You know how I always quite annoyingly and egotistically say, science, you should have just asked me.

00:05:25.240 You didn't have to spend all this money to do a study.

00:05:27.960 You could have just come to me.

00:05:30.100 Just come to me and ask me the question.

00:05:32.560 Save all the money.

00:05:33.500 And, you know, and you're probably saying, okay, that's a little overdone.

00:05:39.500 I hope you're doing this just for entertainment because we don't really believe that it would be better if somebody just came and asked you.

00:05:46.560 I mean, that's not going to be as good as science, Scott.

00:05:50.280 Come on.

00:05:51.340 How can it be as good as science just asking one person?

00:05:55.580 I mean, that's ridiculous.

00:05:56.340 So here's what science just figured out.

00:05:59.420 Without my help at all, marijuana seems to improve orgasmic function in women. 1.00

00:06:13.980 You could have asked me.

00:06:15.980 You could have asked me.

00:06:18.940 Here's another study you don't need to do.

00:06:21.040 Does drinking alcohol make you more likely or less likely to have sex with a stranger?

00:06:30.620 Please, just ask me.

00:06:32.400 Next time you're wondering about that science, just ask me.

00:06:37.220 I've got an answer for that, too.

00:06:40.620 Well, here's something I didn't know.

00:06:42.140 Back in 2015, McKinsey, the consultant group, did a research study, and they found out that one of the best things that a company can do for their profitability is to increase their diversity.

00:06:59.540 Now, that was cool because a lot of people wanted to increase diversity for all the right reasons, you know, to get your company looking like the public and make sure nobody's left behind and there's no discrimination and no bias.

00:07:11.780 And we'd all like that.

00:07:13.100 No discrimination, no bias.

00:07:15.380 But wasn't it great that McKinsey studied and found out that the more diversity you had, the more money you could make, too?

00:07:22.840 There was like a pretty good connection between if you increase your diversity, you'd increase your money.

00:07:30.740 Well, guess what?

00:07:32.460 It turns out that nobody can reproduce that study because it was bullshit.

00:07:36.320 No, there was never any correlation between diversity and income.

00:07:41.540 There's certainly not one that increased the income.

00:07:49.780 I don't want to say it.

00:07:52.120 Don't make me say it.

00:07:56.320 God, I can't.

00:07:58.440 I can't help it.

00:07:59.500 God, you should have just asked me.

00:08:04.420 You could have just fucking asked me.

00:08:07.720 Or if you didn't want to ask me, because, you know, I got a big ego and stuff.

00:08:12.860 You don't want to make me feel like, oh, why do you know everything that science says no?

00:08:16.520 You could have asked anybody who ever had a job.

00:08:22.560 That would do it.

00:08:23.480 You could ask anyone who ever had a job.

00:08:28.300 You didn't really have to study this one.

00:08:31.220 Now, I'm not saying that diversity makes you less profitable.

00:08:34.700 I'm just saying there couldn't possibly have been any study that said it made you more profitable.

00:08:39.860 That in the real world, that wasn't really possible.

00:08:43.180 Or it wasn't possible that you would know.

00:08:45.440 I actually don't know.

00:08:47.240 So I don't know if it makes anything better or worse.

00:08:50.020 I know you can't study it.

00:08:52.400 That's what I know.

00:08:53.160 I know you can't study it.

00:08:54.820 You wouldn't know.

00:08:56.340 And it seems unlikely it would make much of a difference.

00:09:01.200 All right.

00:09:03.240 The Biden administration is backtracking.

00:09:06.100 This is according to the Daily Wire.

00:09:08.700 It says they don't support transgender surgery for minors.

00:09:14.000 What do you think's behind that?

00:09:16.760 Why do you think the Democrats have to come out against trans surgery for minors?

00:09:21.740 And they say the administration does not support surgery for minors in that context.

00:09:33.040 I'm not sure if they had an opinion on it before, or they just didn't talk about it.

00:09:39.560 But they finally had to reach a point where the Republicans were sort of calling out the craziness that they just had to find something closer to realistic, middle, non-crazy.

00:09:54.940 Because I think it's becoming more and more clear that money is driving this.

00:10:00.600 It's not about the benefit of the children.

00:10:04.500 I mean, there's some belief structure that's driving it, too.

00:10:08.340 But the thing that makes the hospitals do it is going to be maybe money.

00:10:14.820 So I do appreciate that the Biden administration has a sensible opinion on this.

00:10:22.420 But it makes you wonder, why is that coming out now?

00:10:26.920 And why did we even have to wonder about it?

00:10:29.180 Like, the level of incompetence coming from the White House, the lack of leadership.

00:10:35.020 Don't you think that a long time ago the White House should have said, just so you know what our opinion is, we're against it.

00:10:42.000 Don't you think that would have been useful at some time in the last several years if, in fact, they were against it?

00:10:48.260 Wouldn't that be the type of leadership you kind of expect from your president and your White House?

00:10:52.540 Why were they silent until now?

00:10:56.080 Like, you know, I hate to be the one who says, what took you so long?

00:10:59.880 But it's worse than that.

00:11:02.040 Because they were already there.

00:11:04.120 It wasn't like it took so long to get something done or decide.

00:11:08.480 They already were there.

00:11:10.100 I don't think they changed anything.

00:11:11.960 They just decided to tell us.

00:11:14.720 The level of incompetence in leadership is just staggering.

00:11:20.200 It's staggering.

00:11:20.760 Can you imagine Trump being silent about that for years while it's happening?

00:11:26.540 I can't.

00:11:28.500 You know, even if it's none of his business, you know, it's private business.

00:11:33.520 Even if it's none of his business, I think he would weigh in on an opinion.

00:11:37.020 So you knew what the White House was thinking.

00:11:39.720 All right.

00:11:40.020 The New York Post had me laughing this morning like crazy.

00:11:43.660 Apparently, Biden, in a speech, used the phrase, over my dead body.

00:11:48.100 And all they did is show a big picture of Biden and the headline, over my dead body.

00:11:55.560 And I laughed for 10 minutes.

00:11:57.840 Now, that is fucking funny.

00:11:59.720 It's funny because they didn't have to find a picture of him looking dead.

00:12:04.780 They just showed his normal picture with no modifications, just talking.

00:12:11.380 And you immediately get the joke that he looks almost dead now over my dead body.

00:12:20.760 And we don't even have to wait until he's dead.

00:12:26.960 Oh, my goodness.

00:12:28.060 Well, like many people, I was waiting with great anticipation to see how Bill Maher would handle the disaster that was a debate.

00:12:39.020 And pretty much the way you thought.

00:12:41.120 It was no surprise.

00:12:45.280 Here's just some of the jokes that Bill Maher said.

00:12:47.740 I mean, he was brutal.

00:12:49.180 He was absolutely brutal with Biden, as you might expect.

00:12:52.820 He said he shit the bed so hard that the Secret Service gave him a new name, Amber Heard.

00:12:59.460 He was more lost than the Malaysian airline.

00:13:03.080 He likes trains, but not trains of thought.

00:13:09.080 And then my favorite part was that Bill Maher said that at one point in the debate, Trump was so far ahead, he started talking about golf.

00:13:17.920 Now, that's a good joke.

00:13:25.000 That's a good joke.

00:13:26.480 Trump was so far ahead, he started talking about golf.

00:13:33.860 Let me say, I'd like to correct an opinion I had.

00:13:38.320 I think I said that Trump made an error in talking about golf.

00:13:43.680 I don't think so anymore.

00:13:46.520 I don't think so.

00:13:47.920 The more I think about his performance, you know, there are lots of little things I wish he'd argued better, but I don't think arguing made any difference at all.

00:13:58.840 I mean, people were strictly looking at the vibe.

00:14:02.160 They saw a strong, in-control person, and they compared it to Biden, and they liked the in-control person a little bit more, the person who looked alive.

00:14:12.240 So I'm not sure if any of the hoaxes made a difference, but I still want to push against them.

00:14:17.500 All right, here's the favorite part of my day.

00:14:20.900 God, I love this.

00:14:22.000 Watching the Democrats wake up to the fact that they are the victims of their own brainwashing and gaslighting.

00:14:31.960 Now, it's one thing when they gaslight Republicans and independents.

00:14:37.380 That's bad.

00:14:38.300 It's bad.

00:14:39.080 It's bad.

00:14:40.620 But watching the Democrat, you know, pundits, even the professionals, the reporters, watching them wake up to how badly they've been gaslighted or gaslit.

00:14:51.920 What's the right way to say that?

00:14:55.620 It's really fun.

00:14:56.960 But also, watching the ones who refuse to wake up is even better.

00:15:00.840 So Bill Maher had Chris Matthews on, and he started to, he was trying to sort of defend, you know, the Democrats a little bit, as best he could.

00:15:11.600 There's not much to work with.

00:15:13.300 And he started saying that the debate wasn't fair.

00:15:16.080 He didn't say fair, but he was indicating, you know, that it was a sort of a lopsided competition, because Trump kept telling one lie after another, and Biden couldn't keep up.

00:15:30.560 That was his defense of Biden, is that he couldn't keep up.

00:15:36.420 That was the defense of Biden, that he couldn't keep up.

00:15:41.900 And Bill Maher said, isn't that the point?

00:15:44.880 You need someone who can keep up?

00:15:50.200 Imagine you're a Democrat, and you're watching Bill Maher, who has achieved, you know, or started with some form of enlightenment, at least about part of this.

00:16:00.520 And he just says the most obvious thing.

00:16:04.240 Isn't that the point?

00:16:05.880 That he's supposed to keep up?

00:16:07.020 Now, why does Bill Maher have to explain to one of the, you know, most experienced observers of politics, Chris Matthews, that the point of the president is to have someone who can keep up with an ordinary conversation?

00:16:22.740 The fact that you haven't had to have that conversation is just delightful.

00:16:27.400 I could not be more amused.

00:16:28.860 Anyway, Stephanie Winston-Walkoff, I guess she is someone who's not crazy about the Trump administration, but she said that in a post that CNN was really part of the reason that Biden looked bad.

00:16:51.860 And here's what she said.

00:16:53.880 No one had to say a word.

00:16:56.040 She screams on X in all caps. 0.95

00:16:58.820 CNN's carefully considered framing and lighting design effectively conveyed the intended perceptions of fragility versus dominance in visual composition.

00:17:10.220 Biden was filmed.

00:17:11.120 Now, this is the debate, the side-by-side view of the debate she's describing.

00:17:17.320 Biden was filmed in profile, looking pale as a ghost.

00:17:21.040 Trump was filmed straight on, not looking his usual shade of tangerine, but more like marmalade.

00:17:27.420 Biden is a man of honor, integrity, resilience, and resolve.

00:17:30.640 So, the reason that Biden looked like he was dead for three days by the time he debated was probably the lighting and the angle that he was filmed at.

00:17:45.760 You know, that's a good point.

00:17:49.340 Because I'll bet there are a lot of videos of Biden from that night, you know, ones they don't show us, in which he looks sharp and totally on the ball.

00:18:00.640 I wish they'd showed us some of those videos instead of those misleading videos where he looks like he's just about dead.

00:18:10.380 All right.

00:18:11.000 Watching Democrats attack CNN for simply holding a debate is a lot of fun.

00:18:18.620 And I might add, I would like to echo some things I saw from a lot of smart people, Elon Musk and a number of other people.

00:18:26.980 I have to say, being, you know, one of the top critics of CNN, I thought they did a good job.

00:18:35.340 How many of you would agree that CNN did just a solid job?

00:18:40.860 Tapper and Bash.

00:18:45.060 Whatever was in their head, we don't know, and that's good.

00:18:48.460 We don't know what was in their heads.

00:18:49.960 They simply gave us a show, exactly what I wanted to say.

00:18:55.080 I didn't think the questions were extra biased in one direction.

00:18:59.300 I didn't see them fact check one, but not the other.

00:19:04.020 I thought they did a good job.

00:19:06.020 Now, I've been telling you for several months that it seems to me I'm seeing indications that CNN wants to find the middle.

00:19:13.860 Yeah, and actually be a useful service to people who want the news.

00:19:19.020 And it seemed to me there was a kind of a marked march toward the middle.

00:19:25.120 And this, I think, was a highlighter there.

00:19:27.720 To me, this was the highlighter of their year.

00:19:30.440 Because they pulled off the hardest thing you can do, which is to make people on the right say, okay, okay, I think you handled that right.

00:19:40.520 So, all credit where credit is due, and especially since I've been a daily critic, I've got to give them credit.

00:19:50.120 I can't skip that.

00:19:52.780 All right.

00:19:54.220 Ontario, the wait is over.

00:19:56.680 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.

00:19:59.500 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.

00:20:07.120 Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting,

00:20:09.240 Signing up is fast and simple.

00:20:11.660 And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

00:20:17.840 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity.

00:20:24.960 At Golden Nugget Online Casino.

00:20:27.320 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action.

00:20:33.780 All from the comfort of your own devices.

00:20:35.600 Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino.

00:20:41.280 Gambling problem?

00:20:42.200 Call Connex Ontario.

00:20:43.520 1-866-531-2600.

00:20:46.500 19 and over.

00:20:47.420 Physically present in Ontario.

00:20:48.800 Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:20:50.400 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details.

00:20:52.880 Please play responsibly.

00:20:53.920 I'm loving the Democrats pretending to be surprised that Biden didn't do well or that there was a possibility he wouldn't do well.

00:21:03.600 And this is where I like to play my game called lying, stupid, or brainwashed.

00:21:08.720 Lying, stupid, or brainwashed.

00:21:10.700 I'm going to give you some examples.

00:21:11.860 Chris Matthews, also on the bill bar, said, we don't know where Trump is going to stop.

00:21:19.720 He says, Trump has made sure I'm going to get even with half of this country that's probably going to vote against me.

00:21:26.280 He's going after public officials.

00:21:28.560 He's going after commenters.

00:21:30.860 He's going to go after editorial writers.

00:21:34.520 He's going to go after everybody.

00:21:36.140 So it's not going to be a free country.

00:21:39.300 He is out there to remove people's rights.

00:21:41.760 We do not know where it's going to end.

00:21:43.920 Nobody can sit there and say that we know where Trump is going to stop.

00:21:50.900 So what do you think?

00:21:54.600 Since obviously we do not observe anything like that in the real world.

00:22:00.280 We had four years of Trump, you know, plus years of watching him.

00:22:04.300 And there's not even a hint of that.

00:22:06.520 Not even a little bit.

00:22:09.000 So is Chris Matthews lying, stupid, or brainwashed?

00:22:13.720 Go.

00:22:14.520 Lying or stupid or brainwashed?

00:22:18.100 I actually want to see your opinions.

00:22:20.680 Lying, stupid, or brainwashed?

00:22:22.700 I see all three brainwashed.

00:22:26.740 Crazy.

00:22:29.080 Well, crazy.

00:22:30.820 I don't know.

00:22:31.200 No, I would rule out crazy.

00:22:33.160 Brainwashed, maybe.

00:22:34.160 All three.

00:22:37.020 All right.

00:22:38.660 Here's what I think.

00:22:40.380 Chris Matthews is not stupid.

00:22:43.080 That's what I think.

00:22:44.500 We watched Chris Matthews for years.

00:22:47.800 You can agree with him or disagree with him or like the show or not like the show.

00:22:51.920 He's not stupid.

00:22:52.660 He's not even close to stupid.

00:22:56.740 So I don't think it's stupid.

00:22:59.160 Is he lying?

00:23:01.220 Does he look like he's just lying?

00:23:02.920 I'm going to say no.

00:23:06.160 It doesn't look like lying to me because you wouldn't tell a lie that stupid.

00:23:13.620 You see what I mean?

00:23:14.800 If he were lying, it would be clever and it would be more subtle.

00:23:18.320 And he might pick one thing like, you know, I'm not worried about him putting 70 million

00:23:24.540 people in jail, but I do worry that he might go after, let's say, a politician I like.

00:23:32.740 You know, something like that would make me think, you know, we're going to have to watch

00:23:37.120 Trump to make sure he doesn't do that because one of the things Republicans do, am I right?

00:23:42.960 They police their own side, I think.

00:23:47.280 I mean, to me, that looks like a difference, but maybe I'm biased about that.

00:23:51.560 So I think he's brainwashed.

00:23:54.140 I think he's brainwashed.

00:23:55.980 But the fun thing is he's not brainwashed by his enemies.

00:24:00.960 That's the fun part.

00:24:02.460 It wasn't his enemies that brainwashed him.

00:24:05.540 It was his own people.

00:24:07.120 And the environment he found himself in.

00:24:10.360 So watching people wake up from the brainwashing from their own team is amazing.

00:24:18.260 It's just amazing.

00:24:19.840 Like as a hypnotist, I cannot be more entertained than watching the mental gymnastics that people

00:24:27.000 have to do to find their way back to reality when they've been gaslit so badly by the people

00:24:33.100 they trusted.

00:24:33.640 So the people they trusted are the problem.

00:24:38.460 It wasn't the people they think are their enemies.

00:24:41.540 We didn't do this.

00:24:43.280 In fact, Republicans have been saying for since 2020, I've been saying since 2020,

00:24:50.120 I didn't think he'd make it a full term.

00:24:52.280 You all remember that, right?

00:24:56.520 There's a post going around on X about John McAfee in 2020, made the prediction that Biden

00:25:07.240 would fade by September of this year.

00:25:09.080 A lot of people made that prediction.

00:25:13.900 A lot of us made that prediction.

00:25:15.860 But here's the thing.

00:25:17.900 If you're a Democrat, at what point do you realize the Republicans had this nailed from

00:25:23.920 the start?

00:25:26.520 At what point do you realize that there were a lot of Republicans who got that whole pandemic

00:25:31.440 thing right?

00:25:32.140 At what point do you realize the Republicans have been right about the border, you know,

00:25:37.760 with some hyperbole that they might not like, but basically right about the border?

00:25:42.360 How many of them are realizing that there weren't any wars under Trump?

00:25:46.860 These are objectively, obviously true things, but Chris Matthews thinks he's trying to prevent

00:25:55.740 Hitler from rising. 0.92

00:25:59.940 That looks like brainwashing to me.

00:26:03.280 I'm going to say brainwashing.

00:26:05.200 Ellen Barkin, aging actress, used to be one of my favorites. 0.98

00:26:10.380 She posted on X.

00:26:11.700 She said, I thought it was obvious to anyone watching that Biden was thrown by CIA.

00:26:16.860 CNN's shockingly biased attack and approach to the evening.

00:26:20.900 Right at the top of the first question was slanted to put Biden on the defensive.

00:26:26.540 If you didn't before now, you know where CNN stands.

00:26:32.140 So what is that?

00:26:34.860 Is that lying, stupid, or brainwashed?

00:26:38.600 Lying, stupid, or brainwashed?

00:26:40.820 This one's easy.

00:26:43.140 No, it's definitely not lying.

00:26:45.280 This one's easy.

00:26:47.160 It's cognitive dissonance.

00:26:49.840 Cognitive dissonance is the only way you can look at that and say that it was biased against

00:26:55.300 Biden.

00:26:56.860 The only way you could see it that way is if your concept of reality got warped, and it

00:27:04.080 can only get warped that fast and in that extreme way through cognitive dissonance.

00:27:09.340 This one's a clean one.

00:27:10.580 This one, you don't have to wonder.

00:27:13.020 This is not an intelligence problem, and she's not lying.

00:27:17.260 You wouldn't tell this lie.

00:27:18.820 You wouldn't tell this lie.

00:27:20.820 Like, she knows that her opinion of CNN's bias isn't going to change anything.

00:27:26.920 So she's just, I think she's just releasing some frustration, and we can see the cognitive

00:27:34.860 dissonance.

00:27:35.440 So she was brainwashed by her own team, and then when the brainwashing didn't match reality

00:27:42.680 that she observed, she was triggered into cognitive dissonance.

00:27:46.540 And then imagined that Biden probably would have done well, except for CNN.

00:27:52.180 So that's how she papers back together her belief that Biden was fine by saying, well,

00:27:57.920 the only thing that was wrong was something else.

00:28:00.020 It wasn't Biden's brain.

00:28:02.020 That's the classic, most classic cognitive dissonance.

00:28:06.900 So I want to be able to teach you that you can see that one right away.

00:28:12.500 Some of these are not so clear.

00:28:14.020 That's what makes it fun.

00:28:15.360 This one's really clear.

00:28:17.060 That's not brains. 0.89

00:28:18.240 It's not lying.

00:28:19.940 It's cognitive dissonance.

00:28:21.180 It's a perfect example.

00:28:24.360 All right.

00:28:24.700 The tell for cognitive dissonance is that the way you interpret the world looks absurd to

00:28:30.060 a reasonable person, and it looks absurd to think that CNN was biased against Biden in

00:28:37.220 that debate.

00:28:37.720 Meanwhile, Bob Woodward, you know him from the Watergate days, he was brought on, and he said

00:28:47.400 of Biden, his performance was, I sat there and watched it, and I could not believe it.

00:28:56.120 Not only is this a political hydrogen bomb for him and the Democratic Party, what happened?

00:29:01.720 What happened?

00:29:03.400 It was almost impossible.

00:29:07.060 Say it.

00:29:08.000 Say it.

00:29:09.340 Say it, Bob.

00:29:11.380 Say it.

00:29:13.580 Say it.

00:29:14.520 Come on, Bob Woodward.

00:29:16.480 Say it.

00:29:18.200 We know you want to.

00:29:19.580 Say it.

00:29:21.500 Was it worse than Watergate?

00:29:22.940 And then he went on to say, there must be a, quote, large explanation for this.

00:29:34.360 Is he lying, stupid, or brainwashed?

00:29:39.480 Lying, stupid, or brainwashed.

00:29:41.500 TDS would be brainwashed.

00:29:43.720 Lying, stupid, or brainwashed.

00:29:48.320 He's not stupid.

00:29:50.600 He's not stupid.

00:29:51.680 You can rule that one out.

00:29:53.460 He's got a body of work.

00:29:55.240 Definitely not stupid.

00:29:58.480 Is he lying?

00:30:00.440 Well, I would rule out lying because he's acting like it's a mystery.

00:30:04.820 He says there is an explanation, but he doesn't know what it is.

00:30:09.620 It's a mystery.

00:30:11.260 That's not how you lie.

00:30:13.420 That's not a lying pattern.

00:30:15.580 A lying pattern is, I know what the problem is, and it's CNN or something else.

00:30:20.180 Well, that would have been cognitive dissonance, too.

00:30:22.980 But lying shows more certainty.

00:30:26.260 He's expressing what I think is genuine confusion.

00:30:28.940 And he imagines that there's a large explanation that he can't identify.

00:30:35.720 What's that?

00:30:37.860 That's cognitive dissonance.

00:30:39.540 That's a perfect example.

00:30:40.840 He imagines that there's something we haven't all observed that's obvious, that's hiding out there outside the view of our ability to see it.

00:30:51.620 That must be the big explanation that he doesn't know.

00:30:54.540 Do any of you think there's anything missing in the story?

00:31:00.140 I don't.

00:31:01.700 I feel like everything is completely transparent.

00:31:05.540 They had a candidate they knew was sketchy.

00:31:09.280 They didn't have many options once he was committed.

00:31:12.400 He was probably the one making the decisions, Biden.

00:31:15.360 Maybe his staff wasn't capable, obviously.

00:31:17.560 And all of those things in a very normal and obvious way get us to this point.

00:31:24.100 There's no mystery here.

00:31:26.880 The mystery is that Bob Woodward can't understand how brainwashed he was by his own side.

00:31:35.380 He's not able to accept it.

00:31:37.160 So instead, he imagines, he hallucinates the same way Ellen Barkin hallucinated that CNN was after Biden.

00:31:46.480 That's a pure hallucination.

00:31:48.500 Woodward is hallucinating that there's some thing unexplained that if you only knew it, all of this would make sense.

00:31:57.620 It's all explained.

00:31:58.940 There's nothing unexplained.

00:32:00.460 That's cognitive dissonance.

00:32:02.480 It's a very clean example.

00:32:04.160 The more examples you see, the better you can spot.

00:32:07.540 That's why I do this.

00:32:09.540 All right.

00:32:10.700 All right.

00:32:11.320 There's the host of The View, one of them, Alyssa Farrah Griffin.

00:32:15.660 You should know she's a big anti-Trumper, of course, because she's on The View. 0.92

00:32:20.900 And she was saying after the debate that she feels deceived by the White House about his fitness for office.

00:32:29.140 Quote, I feel duped, she said Friday.

00:32:31.980 She feels duped.

00:32:36.800 Okay.

00:32:37.740 Is she stupid, lying, or brainwashed? 1.00

00:32:43.180 Stupid, lying, or brainwashed?

00:32:45.760 She says directly, they must have been lying to me.

00:32:49.560 I feel duped.

00:32:50.540 Is she stupid, lying, or brainwashed? 1.00

00:32:54.080 Well, she's not brainwashed. 0.85

00:32:56.240 I mean, she's not brainwashed on this topic because she's seeing it clearly that, wait a minute, you must have known this.

00:33:04.800 So she's not brainwashed.

00:33:06.340 Is she lying?

00:33:09.960 No, there's no evidence of lying.

00:33:12.120 She's saying it looks like they fooled me or that they duped me.

00:33:15.740 That's not a lie.

00:33:17.000 That's what we observe.

00:33:19.120 But is she stupid? 0.52

00:33:20.300 Yes, obviously.

00:33:26.920 Yes.

00:33:27.660 But not about this.

00:33:29.800 Not on this.

00:33:31.000 She's right on.

00:33:32.080 She has identified that she was fooled, admitting she was fooled.

00:33:37.300 That is not cognitive dissonance because it's perfectly compatible with observation.

00:33:41.680 She has adjusted her prior thinking to be compatible with new information.

00:33:48.060 There's no illusion going on.

00:33:50.460 But you have to ask yourself, how could she be fooled by this?

00:33:55.020 Because we all were watching it at the same time.

00:33:59.580 It's not somebody else brainwashing you when you're looking at a live video and he looks like he's falling apart to anybody who's looking.

00:34:08.920 That's not somebody else doing it to you.

00:34:12.540 And that's not brainwashed.

00:34:14.360 And it's not lying.

00:34:16.560 That's stupid.

00:34:18.400 That's stupid.

00:34:19.720 If you looked at Biden for a year and you didn't think that it was at least a good chance that he'd have a bad debate, well, I can't excuse that away.

00:34:30.540 I think there's something wrong with your ability to think or observe.

00:34:35.360 Maybe observing is the bigger problem.

00:34:37.520 How about there's a bunch of Hollywood donors that are all panicked now.

00:34:44.500 And the story is from somebody who said, there's a sense that the money dried up last night, meaning the debate, that the money dried up last night about 10 minutes into the debate.

00:34:54.960 To which I say, I don't think that's the only thing that dried up, if you know what I mean.

00:35:03.540 Imagine you're a woman and you like your presidents to do a good job of protecting you because that's like the main thing, got to be protected. 1.00

00:35:14.680 Did Biden look like somebody who could protect you or anything else?

00:35:21.080 Or anything else?

00:35:25.000 Now, Biden does not look like somebody who could protect you from anything.

00:35:29.560 And my theory is that that dried up the women immediately. 1.00

00:35:37.340 Once they realized that Trump was strong and he likes America and they realized that Biden is weak and almost dead, but he too likes America.

00:35:48.600 If you live in America and you live in America, who's going to protect you?

00:35:55.160 Clearly, the one who is strong.

00:35:58.140 So if you go into the weeds of who had the better policies, nobody cares.

00:36:03.400 I mean, we pretend we care, but we vote for other reasons.

00:36:07.460 We vote how we feel.

00:36:08.360 And energy and power and strength and protection and who's on your side.

00:36:14.240 That's the stuff that really puts it over the finish line.

00:36:18.800 All right.

00:36:20.440 Here's, I mean, today's news could not be more delicious.

00:36:24.120 The Atlantic, which is well known as just a pure Democrat vehicle.

00:36:29.520 All right.

00:36:29.820 The Atlantic doesn't even pretend that it's, you know, trying to both sides things.

00:36:34.420 It's not like the regular press.

00:36:35.640 They are just purely a Democrat propaganda magazine.

00:36:40.460 And here's what they say.

00:36:43.440 They say that the most patriotic option, if, you know, if you believe the threat that the world, you know, the world's in trouble and Hitler could take over, you know, Trump, in their view.

00:36:58.780 Why would you run Biden?

00:37:00.320 Why would Biden be your candidate if the alternative is the end of the country?

00:37:07.880 If you really believe your own brainwashing, the first thing you do, even if you are Biden, even if you're Biden, you'd say, oh, wow, I've lost a step.

00:37:18.560 I better, you know, get a better person in here.

00:37:20.820 Do you know where that frame comes from, that if if Biden believes that we have all these troubles with Trump, why doesn't he make sure that Trump doesn't win by getting out of the way?

00:37:34.040 Because obviously he can't win.

00:37:35.100 That's Greg Gottfeld's frame from the five and from Gottfeld the show.

00:37:43.160 So Gottfeld has been asking this provocative question.

00:37:46.060 And I love this question because it's a it's a total brainwash breaker.

00:37:49.820 It's a antidote to the gaslighting.

00:37:53.280 Explain to us why, if you've been saying Democrats, please, Democrats, explain to us if you really believe any of the things you're saying, the fine people hoax, he's going to take your democracy and become a dictator.

00:38:06.640 If you believe any of that, why are you running Biden?

00:38:10.100 You know, that's the opposite of what you would do if you believe your own your own most important story.

00:38:19.020 So now the Atlantic has adopted Greg Gottfeld's frame of what the hell are you doing?

00:38:26.680 This can't be explained in any rational world.

00:38:30.640 Something has to be just badly broken, meaning the capability of the Democrats.

00:38:35.680 Did you ever think you would see the Atlantic and Fox News hosts being on the same page to this degree?

00:38:49.040 This is actually a deep agreement.

00:38:52.380 You know, there could be surfacy things.

00:38:54.840 A surfacy thing would be, OK, we all agree that Biden had a bad debate.

00:38:59.220 That's kind of surfacy.

00:39:00.080 But to take it all the way down to, once we've all seen this, why is he still the candidate?

00:39:08.060 That's a deep agreement.

00:39:10.020 You don't see deep agreement, you know, this far into an election season.

00:39:18.980 I would submit to you that something really big may have happened that we won't recognize until after the fact.

00:39:25.640 I always talk about persuasion that the Democrats have this hoaxocracy.

00:39:32.080 They have literally a mesh network of of hoaxes.

00:39:38.260 Now, here I'm going to delight my technically minded people who know what a mesh network is.

00:39:44.440 If you have a Wi-Fi, you probably know a mesh network is where the nodes kind of support each other.

00:39:49.980 So they have, you know, and I described this the other day on the whiteboard.

00:39:54.420 The reason that they believe the fine people hoax is because they already believed the the hoax that he thinks that the Mexicans are all rapists and killers.

00:40:05.920 Literally something that nobody believes, including Trump.

00:40:09.120 So they use one hoax to support the belief in the other hoax and vice versa.

00:40:16.840 So both hoaxes.

00:40:19.020 Are believable only because the other hoax is believable and vice versa.

00:40:23.980 So they feel actually a mesh network of hoaxes.

00:40:28.100 So to to and by the way, this is what I've been dealing with as a persuader.

00:40:34.200 I've never figured out how you could break the mesh.

00:40:37.100 You can break like one at a time, but then it just heals.

00:40:40.720 It's like a self-healing hoax mesh network.

00:40:45.100 As soon as you're done debunking something, you can watch it reform as soon as the conversation zone.

00:40:51.600 But right back to where it was, it just heals.

00:40:54.960 And what you needed was going to go into analogy territory, a Rosetta Stone.

00:41:00.200 You needed a discovery of a thing that would allow Democrats to escape from the gaslighting they gave themselves.

00:41:09.360 They built a world that only makes sense within the world, within the mesh network of hoaxes.

00:41:15.340 As soon as you get out of it and you realize that the mesh network is fake, all the rest of it is at risk for the first time.

00:41:24.260 Now, remember, I kept telling you that the fine people hoax was the tentpole hoax.

00:41:29.960 And I was saying, if we can just debunk this one, that will be the Rosetta Stone.

00:41:36.400 And that will be the one that lets people say, oh, wait a minute.

00:41:39.700 If we were that fooled about this one, what about those other ones?

00:41:44.600 And then they would start to maybe look at them a little more critically.

00:41:47.320 And then the whole mesh network would come down.

00:41:50.720 That was my thinking of the best case scenario, is if you get the big one, the one that supports all the other ones, the other ones will collapse.

00:41:59.840 I completely underestimated the power of the mesh network.

00:42:03.140 It just didn't work.

00:42:05.100 But it turns out that Democrats just found out that there was a bigger tentpole.

00:42:12.920 The biggest tentpole is that Biden has always been okay behind closed doors.

00:42:21.360 And now nobody believes it.

00:42:23.640 Nobody believes it.

00:42:24.920 And everybody believes it was a lie, Democrats included.

00:42:28.540 They all believe they've been lied to by the same people who have been lying to me and to you.

00:42:35.120 And somehow that debate became the Rosetta Stone.

00:42:45.280 Not for the Republicans, because we were already, you know, I say we because I caucus with Republicans, but I'm technically a Democrat.

00:42:56.240 Everything that they're just finding out, we all knew as base reality.

00:43:02.080 We all knew it.

00:43:03.200 Nobody's surprised.

00:43:05.260 Not a single person is really surprised who was not part of the gaslighting, you know, architecture.

00:43:13.060 But apparently, this was such a stark and obvious and observable break with reality, the reality that he's fine, that it's just so observably not true,

00:43:23.720 that you can see that some number of them were triggered into cognitive dissonance, where they literally believe absurdities,

00:43:30.700 like CNN was out to get him, and that's the reason he looked bad.

00:43:34.520 Or he had one.

00:43:35.620 They're also saying he had one bad day.

00:43:37.920 I call that the OJ defense.

00:43:40.180 Well, OJ only had one bad day.

00:43:46.040 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.

00:43:50.440 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.

00:43:54.040 Conditions apply.

00:43:54.760 Scotiabank, you're richer than you think.

00:43:59.460 So, I think this might be bigger than you think.

00:44:06.680 Much bigger.

00:44:07.620 It's not just about, will Biden be the candidate.

00:44:12.300 You know, that's the way we're treating it.

00:44:13.840 It's way bigger.

00:44:14.620 You're actually watching Democrats start to escape from the brainwashing.

00:44:22.380 Let me give you...

00:44:25.020 One of the other absurdities is that people are using the Fetterman analogy to think about Biden.

00:44:33.720 So, you know how Fetterman looked like he couldn't possibly do the job when he was running for Senate,

00:44:38.640 because he had that stroke and his brain wasn't functioning.

00:44:41.740 Now, I, like many other people who turned out to be totally wrong,

00:44:47.760 were not so sure he could recover from that.

00:44:50.520 He did.

00:44:51.860 And I got to give him complete credit for that.

00:44:55.680 And further, I'd say he's a pretty solid Democrat.

00:45:00.620 Right?

00:45:01.340 You know, if he had to put up with a Democrat, he'd be the one.

00:45:04.920 Like, he's pretty solid.

00:45:06.640 You know, kind of a common sense approach to politics.

00:45:09.940 Don't always agree with him.

00:45:11.020 But I always say, okay, you're coming from this from some reasoned opinion.

00:45:16.720 So, here's the problem.

00:45:19.120 Fetterman had a problem that you could recover from.

00:45:23.440 One that you could recover from.

00:45:26.140 Biden doesn't have one of those.

00:45:28.480 That's the problem with analogies.

00:45:30.940 One is not like the other.

00:45:33.560 Biden is old.

00:45:35.560 You don't recover from old.

00:45:37.100 He's not going to have, like, weeks where he doesn't have a day like that.

00:45:43.140 It only gets worse.

00:45:44.540 And so, any imagination that it was just a bad day or transitory is probably closer to cognitive dissonance or stupidity or something like that.

00:45:53.180 Here's another funny one.

00:45:56.020 A body language expert.

00:45:58.880 Fox News has a story on this.

00:46:01.720 Did a, quote, brutal takedown on Biden's debate performance.

00:46:05.720 Did anybody need to hear from a body language expert that this looks like somebody losing a debate?

00:46:16.140 I'm doing a hilarious impression of Biden's face, in case you're just listening to it.

00:46:25.020 If you're listening to it, I'm going to do it again.

00:46:27.960 So, there'll be a brief silence for the amusement of those watching.

00:46:32.360 Do you have to be much of a body language expert to see this, as maybe a problem, a sign of somebody who's not exactly winning the debate?

00:46:47.360 Yep, could have asked Scott.

00:46:49.080 One of my favorite personalities who I don't agree with is Cenk Uyghur. 1.00

00:46:57.120 And what I love about him, even while, you know, being annoyed by some of his opinions, is that he does not seem to be subject to brainwashing.

00:47:09.180 He does seem immune from it.

00:47:11.340 His opinions, when I disagree with him, look like his own opinions.

00:47:15.200 They actually don't look assigned, which is weird.

00:47:19.540 Same with Bill Maher.

00:47:21.160 So, those are two people who, even when I disagree, which I do, I think, well, at least you thought about it.

00:47:28.840 Right?

00:47:29.400 So, here's what Cenk says, and he's using the word hypnosis in his description, which is yet another sign that he has escaped the matrix.

00:47:40.740 Listen to this.

00:47:42.620 This is from Cenk Uyghur.

00:47:44.520 I think this debate was a seminal moment in American politics.

00:47:48.880 So, you know, he's agreeing with everybody there.

00:47:52.040 Political and media handlers create a mirage.

00:47:55.320 Oh.

00:47:56.400 Hello.

00:47:57.620 Now we're getting interesting.

00:47:59.440 Reagan is cowboy.

00:48:00.720 Trump is businessman.

00:48:01.900 Biden is competent steward.

00:48:06.100 He's starting to sound like me.

00:48:09.000 As in, the media assigns your opinion.

00:48:12.720 He hasn't said that.

00:48:13.640 But look how close he gets.

00:48:17.400 And at the debate, when the whole country saw Biden as he truly is, instead of what the establishment had been pretending he was, it was a shock to the system.

00:48:27.400 Yep.

00:48:27.680 I'm hoping it's going to help snap people, especially Democratic voters, out of this hypnosis that they're in.

00:48:37.440 Yep.

00:48:39.280 Yep.

00:48:42.440 Democratic leadership is not actually competent.

00:48:47.640 Yep.

00:48:48.160 Watching him crawl out of the matrix is just breathtaking.

00:48:56.080 And I'll credit him, honestly.

00:48:59.920 They are not more likely to win.

00:49:03.400 Their positions of authority are misleading you into believing they're competent and honest.

00:49:10.180 No.

00:49:10.980 This whole thing is a mirage.

00:49:12.780 And you just saw the man behind the curtain.

00:49:14.860 Yes.

00:49:18.360 Now, wake up.

00:49:20.700 Oh, God, you're perfect.

00:49:22.300 Stop trusting them.

00:49:23.780 They don't have your best interests in mind.

00:49:26.740 They have their best interests in mind.

00:49:29.440 How much do you love that?

00:49:35.240 So, Cenk, congratulations.

00:49:39.240 This is a fully formed mind operating in the context of insanity and stupidity.

00:49:50.400 And he found a way out.

00:49:52.180 This is not easy.

00:49:53.340 What he's doing right here, he's, first of all, bucking, you know, all of his audience, most of it.

00:50:00.640 So, that's not easy.

00:50:02.380 And he's admitting that his team is the problem.

00:50:07.840 And they are.

00:50:09.100 They have brainwashed their own side to the point of incompetence.

00:50:12.560 And he's calling it out as directly as you can.

00:50:16.120 And he's using all the right words.

00:50:18.480 That it's hypnosis and you need to wake up.

00:50:22.520 Good job.

00:50:24.420 Good job.

00:50:25.560 So, you know, I like to point out that, you know, we have a competitive system.

00:50:30.800 But the competitive system only works if reasonable people are making competitive arguments.

00:50:38.720 I would love that Cenk could get enough of Democrats out of the matrix and their hypnosis

00:50:45.000 that they could form some kind of a pushback against Republican policy.

00:50:50.140 Which, by the way, I don't always love.

00:50:53.360 What I do love is the country honestly debating things that are important,

00:50:58.500 showing both sides, fighting it out, and finding some reasonable thing we can live with.

00:51:04.400 I love that.

00:51:05.660 But we don't have that.

00:51:07.380 We have gaslighting versus what the hell is going on.

00:51:11.740 Gaslighting versus what the hell are you doing is not any kind of competitive contest.

00:51:16.800 It needs to be a competition about what's the best thing to do.

00:51:20.260 Cenk seems to be ready for that fight.

00:51:22.520 I'm ready for that fight.

00:51:24.480 I think most of you are ready for that fight.

00:51:26.900 Let's have that fight.

00:51:28.780 That's the virtuous fight.

00:51:31.680 Why can't we have the virtuous fight?

00:51:34.180 That's what made America.

00:51:36.120 America is a virtuous fight.

00:51:38.320 Except for the overseas stuff we do that's crazy.

00:51:41.400 So let's have a virtuous fight.

00:51:43.240 We could do that.

00:51:44.760 We found an accidental way to all be on the same page,

00:51:48.400 which is that the White House was lying to all of us.

00:51:51.280 That is the first time we can genuinely say,

00:51:56.660 okay, you and I are on the same side right now.

00:51:59.940 We disagree about who should be the president,

00:52:02.520 but we're not disagreeing about what just happened to all of us,

00:52:05.900 because it happened to all of us.

00:52:08.020 It's just that, you know, half of the country didn't believe it.

00:52:11.440 So we don't have the same mental gymnastics that we have to solve.

00:52:16.100 But Cenk solved his.

00:52:18.900 So I would say if you're a Democrat and you just want somebody who can see through the illusions,

00:52:25.020 he's your guy.

00:52:26.040 That's a full-throated endorsement.

00:52:29.720 At the same time, I don't agree with him on everything that he thinks about.

00:52:35.740 All right.

00:52:36.480 There's an Axios reporter talking about Biden.

00:52:39.360 He says that Democrats are in full freak out mode.

00:52:41.840 This is Alex Thompson, writes for Axios.

00:52:44.600 Because what they saw is finally what they have been obscuring.

00:52:50.640 And he says, well, listen, I've been covering the Biden White House now for three and a half years.

00:52:54.880 So he's a national political reporter.

00:52:58.240 And he was telling CNN, and as someone that's reported on his age quite a few times talking about Biden,

00:53:04.860 I can tell you that the White House's response every single time that it's come up for three and a half years

00:53:09.920 has been to deflect, to gaslight, to gaslight.

00:53:16.400 This is an Axios reporter on CNN telling Democrats that,

00:53:24.880 that even the reporters have been gaslit.

00:53:29.540 I hope you understand how big this is.

00:53:32.460 This might be the Rosetta Stone I was waiting for.

00:53:35.880 I just was looking in the wrong place.

00:53:37.480 And so, gaslight, to not tell the truth, not just to reporters, not just to other Democrats,

00:53:49.660 but even at times to themselves.

00:53:51.660 So he even says they're gaslighting themselves.

00:53:54.260 Well, that part's a little mind reading.

00:53:56.220 I don't know that they're gaslighting themselves.

00:53:58.400 I would agree that that's probable.

00:54:01.780 I think it's probable that they've talked themselves into a reality that's not real,

00:54:06.560 but not confirmed.

00:54:08.720 You know, they could be lying.

00:54:09.960 You can't rule that out.

00:54:10.780 But I would like to offer a clarification to Axios' Alex Thompson.

00:54:17.820 First of all, like I said with Cenk, I really appreciate this.

00:54:23.820 I completely appreciate that he's now understanding that he got gaslit.

00:54:29.020 Here's where I disagree.

00:54:33.360 That it's their fault.

00:54:35.820 That it's the White House's fault that he got gaslit.

00:54:40.780 He has a television.

00:54:43.160 He can see what we see.

00:54:45.280 Why is it that the reporter got gaslit and admits it when you and I didn't?

00:54:53.160 What's up with that?

00:54:54.980 The reporter's job is to tell us what's true.

00:54:57.240 But we knew what was true, and we watched him tell us what obviously was gaslighting

00:55:03.080 and not true.

00:55:05.200 I think there's still a missing part where the media says, yes, they fooled us, but we

00:55:12.540 should not have been fooled by something that we could see with our own eyes.

00:55:16.480 So the fact that he was accepting their narrative, while observably it wasn't true, what does

00:55:24.280 that tell you?

00:55:24.920 I don't know how to interpret this one.

00:55:29.140 To me, it looks like maybe a little ass covering.

00:55:32.540 You know, when he realizes how badly he'd been duped, you didn't want to say, you know, I didn't

00:55:36.860 notice there was anything wrong with Biden.

00:55:39.080 Because that's embarrassing.

00:55:41.140 Kind of embarrassing to say you didn't notice.

00:55:44.080 You know, until the debate.

00:55:45.300 So I think there's just a whole bunch of ass covering going on.

00:55:48.980 It's like, oh, I think it's CNN's fault.

00:55:50.760 No, I think it's the White House's fault.

00:55:52.880 How about every reporter who lied to us about everything forever?

00:55:57.580 How about it's your fault for a change?

00:56:01.520 All right.

00:56:02.100 If I were Trump, I would remind Democrats that their own side lied to them, not just lied

00:56:09.340 to them on something small, but this Biden lie is going to destroy the Democrat Party

00:56:15.940 for a generation.

00:56:16.820 If I were Trump, I would tell them that directly.

00:56:20.480 Look, we all watched the debate.

00:56:23.680 You know that your White House was lying to you.

00:56:26.680 They have lied to you in such a bad lie that it could destroy their own party and your preferences

00:56:34.800 for a generation.

00:56:37.220 When they fact check me, they say, maybe your economy wasn't as good as you say.

00:56:44.140 Trump is a salesman.

00:56:48.100 He exaggerates everything, but you can tell by his exaggerations he's trying to do your work

00:56:53.820 and selling is part of doing your work.

00:56:57.220 He's selling, he's overselling, he's overclaiming, and then that allows him the freedom to negotiate

00:57:04.800 towards something in the middle where everybody's a little uncomfortable, but it's the best you

00:57:08.720 can do.

00:57:09.000 To allow the fake news to continue equating Trump's hyperbole, that doesn't pass any fact

00:57:19.120 checking, to something like gaslighting the country about who is in charge of it, who's

00:57:26.500 in charge?

00:57:27.780 We actually don't know.

00:57:29.560 They're gaslighting us about who the president is, in effect.

00:57:34.160 They're gaslighting us that a corpse is alive at a time when we're involved in two hot wars.

00:57:44.560 That's not forgivable.

00:57:47.000 That's not forgivable.

00:57:49.000 Not by Democrats, not by Republicans.

00:57:52.420 And it's going to take a generation in all likelihood.

00:57:55.540 The likely path of things is that the Republicans are going to take everything.

00:57:59.620 We're looking at a world where the Republicans have the House, the Senate, the presidency,

00:58:04.580 and the Supreme Court.

00:58:07.920 Everything.

00:58:09.420 And that is only because the Democrats didn't put up a good competitor.

00:58:15.200 You don't think a good Democrat could have had a nice shot at beating Trump?

00:58:20.440 I think so.

00:58:21.340 I think that anybody who just could show that they had a pulse and they were alive would

00:58:27.120 have beat Trump because the press would have lined up and backed them because they could.

00:58:33.720 It's a reasonable person.

00:58:34.860 Now we can get behind this.

00:58:36.360 And then they would just do what they always do.

00:58:38.980 They would brainwash half the country and play with some rules with the election, maybe 0.87

00:58:45.620 legally, but play with some rules and find a way to win like they have in the past.

00:58:51.340 But because of their own gaslighting, primarily gaslighting of their own people, far more than

00:58:57.920 the Republicans got gaslit, Republicans didn't get gaslit at all.

00:59:02.720 There wasn't a single Republican I've ever met who fell for any of it.

00:59:07.680 It was all an in-team kind of brainwashing.

00:59:11.920 At least the successful part was in-team.

00:59:16.020 But think about it.

00:59:17.100 So I think Trump is missing the big play, the real kill shot.

00:59:22.880 The kill shot is they're brainwashing you.

00:59:26.600 Your own team is doing this to you.

00:59:29.100 If you think that I haven't passed the fact checking, just look at what I've said.

00:59:34.040 It's all at least directionally true.

00:59:36.160 And I am going to over-claim a little bit for your benefit.

00:59:38.900 Remember, I'm on your team now.

00:59:40.540 See, I think the thing that people don't understand is that Trump doesn't have a path to win unless

00:59:47.700 he does a good job for the country.

00:59:50.100 There's no winning path otherwise.

00:59:52.860 They've hallucinated that he can become president and turn it into a dictatorship.

00:59:58.420 That's not real.

01:00:01.440 Because Republicans have guns and they're not going to let that happen.

01:00:04.840 Just ask.

01:00:07.740 No Republican is going to let him become a dictator.

01:00:10.760 Do you think he'd be happy if he became a dictator and passed the crown down to Don Jr.?

01:00:15.900 And do you think Don Jr. would take the crown?

01:00:18.520 In the unlikely event that Trump tried to create a dictatorship,

01:00:25.000 his own family wouldn't be in favor of it.

01:00:27.740 His own family would shut it down so fast.

01:00:30.660 And of course, it's never going to happen because Trump knows there's no path there.

01:00:35.600 Now, you might say, you know, power is corrupting.

01:00:39.620 Yes, power is corrupting, but he doesn't have that kind of power.

01:00:43.080 Presidents don't have a power to just unilaterally decide, oh, I think I'd like to stay in office.

01:00:48.400 We've got this whole military and the Republican Party would make sure it doesn't happen.

01:00:53.860 Remember, the Republicans are not about give us a dictator who agrees with us.

01:00:58.360 They're about the Constitution.

01:00:59.660 It's the most fundamental thing that Democrats don't seem to get, or at least maybe this time

01:01:05.280 they don't get it.

01:01:06.680 Why would you think that the entire Republican Party, because they like this one candidate,

01:01:11.880 would also like a dictatorship?

01:01:13.520 That's not a reasonable opinion.

01:01:16.400 It's not reasonable.

01:01:17.940 That is batshit crazy stuff.

01:01:20.220 And you can only get there through some kind of gaslighting.

01:01:23.240 You can't get there through thinking or observing anything.

01:01:25.720 So the waking up is going to be fun.

01:01:32.740 Let's talk about the two big court cases.

01:01:35.020 I'm not, you should probably listen to the legal experts on the court cases, but just

01:01:39.860 to give you a sense of it, there's this, one of the Supreme Court cases was about the

01:01:45.480 Fisher versus somebody.

01:01:47.360 And the idea was that the obstruction charges against the January 6 people were not based

01:01:56.260 on a real law.

01:01:57.860 And the Supreme Court just agreed, nope, there's no law like that.

01:02:02.840 So apparently the prosecutions basically made up a law in which they borrowed from an unrelated

01:02:09.200 field that said you can't destroy documents if there's some kind of official proceeding.

01:02:17.360 Now, no documents or evidence, let's say evidence that's part of a legal proceeding, no evidence

01:02:23.380 or documents were destroyed on January 6.

01:02:26.440 But somehow the prosecutors decided that even though it clearly didn't apply, they had enough

01:02:32.420 power that they could make it act like it applied.

01:02:36.700 If Trump had not been president and applied a majority, you know, and appointed a majority

01:02:43.300 to the court, it makes me wonder which direction this would have gone.

01:02:51.420 So the Supreme Court has ruled that all of those people in jail, now they have multiple

01:02:57.280 charges I'll talk about, but at least the biggest charge wasn't ever real.

01:03:03.560 That really happened.

01:03:04.640 Now, the Democrats aren't going to understand it because it's complicated, but just think

01:03:09.880 about this.

01:03:10.720 The Department of Justice, the weaponized lawfare Department of Justice, took a law that was

01:03:17.620 clearly unrelated to their situation and tortured it until they could get a conviction because

01:03:24.160 everything's fixed.

01:03:25.340 And the Supreme Court, only because there had ever been a Trump or a Republican, and they

01:03:32.620 had a majority, reversed it.

01:03:37.040 Now, is that the one that, I think that's the one that had Justice Ketanji, give me a fact

01:03:47.140 check, which one was Justice Ketanji Jackson Brown also agreed with?

01:03:53.200 Was it this one or the other one?

01:03:55.340 But there was a, I saw a fascinating little piece, I think it was this one.

01:04:02.560 So they got at least one Biden-appointed justice to agree with the Republicans.

01:04:10.480 And I have to say, this would be the second time I've said to myself, with my eyebrow going

01:04:16.380 up, huh, you know, you expect the conservative judges to just always be conservative and the

01:04:24.820 others to be the other way.

01:04:26.400 But I kind of respect that she joined the majority on this.

01:04:31.700 So I'm going to keep an eye on her.

01:04:33.560 And I'm going to say, I wonder if she'll be one of the superstars of the court.

01:04:38.520 Maybe so.

01:04:39.300 Because anybody who can ever, anybody who can ever just see the law that doesn't bend one

01:04:47.060 way or the other, anybody who can just cross teams when they need to, you automatically have

01:04:52.340 my respect.

01:04:53.820 So I'm going to say that she has my respect.

01:04:56.220 And I'm going to keep an eye on her because she might be the real deal.

01:05:01.740 I don't know.

01:05:02.800 It might be a good appointment.

01:05:05.020 I don't like justices who always are predictable.

01:05:08.340 If my justice is perfectly predictable, then they're not a justice at all.

01:05:13.180 I don't need to have a Supreme Court justice where I know which way they're going to vote.

01:05:18.720 That's no good.

01:05:19.860 What's the point of that?

01:05:20.720 You know, I want one who can look at it and go, you know what, this time the people you

01:05:26.420 think are my team may be wrong.

01:05:29.960 So I know I'm getting ahead of myself and she may disappoint you in a hundred ways in

01:05:33.680 the future.

01:05:34.260 And I'll revise my opinion when that happens.

01:05:37.800 All right.

01:05:38.640 But anyway, if you think that the reversal of the obstruction part will free the January

01:05:44.840 Sixers, you might be disappointed. 0.87

01:05:48.060 I hate to give you the bad news.

01:05:50.720 Here's the problem.

01:05:52.420 Most of them were charged with one big thing, which was the obstruction, and then smaller

01:05:57.980 things, misdemeanors.

01:06:00.200 The smaller things like trespassing would have smaller sentences, let's say six months to

01:06:05.940 12 months.

01:06:06.960 The obstruction would have a longer sentence.

01:06:09.640 But the way they were sentenced, I think in most or all cases, is that the sentences were

01:06:14.840 concurrent, meaning that they weren't one after another for each crime, but they were served

01:06:21.260 at the same time.

01:06:22.560 So if you had a six-month sentence and also a 12-month sentence, you would serve them both

01:06:28.720 in 12 months because the six months would be part of the 12.

01:06:32.520 But the judge has control over that.

01:06:36.700 The judge did not have to rule that way.

01:06:39.520 The judge could have said you have to serve one after another.

01:06:44.340 Now, that wasn't necessary because as long as you had the obstruction charge, you already

01:06:50.000 had a nice long sentence.

01:06:51.640 So the lesser ones could be rolled in there and it still looked like justice to them because

01:06:57.520 it's a long sentence.

01:06:58.880 Now, if you take away the long sentence, you're left with the smaller six-month, 12-month

01:07:05.300 charges.

01:07:07.400 One of the things the judges could do is re-sentence them so that they're no longer served at the

01:07:14.720 same time, but one after the other.

01:07:17.280 And they would have full flexibility to do that because their opinion is the crime was

01:07:24.120 so bad that it needs to be maximum penalty.

01:07:29.440 Now, that apparently applies to maybe most of the people.

01:07:34.160 So the number of people who are just going to walk out the door, I think there's at least

01:07:37.640 one.

01:07:38.580 I think there's at least one case where somebody just walked out the door, but that's rare.

01:07:43.740 So they're going to have to appeal.

01:07:46.960 The judge is going to have to be unusually flexible and not in the way that we expect.

01:07:53.880 So that's going to be a problem.

01:07:57.180 And then there's a far worse injustice here.

01:08:01.600 Here's the one that's just making me sick to my stomach.

01:08:04.220 In some cases, people pled guilty to the longer one, they pled guilty to obstruction because

01:08:16.620 they just wanted to make the lesser ones go away or something.

01:08:20.260 They thought it was the best thing.

01:08:22.020 So there's some people who did some, I may have this wrong, but there's some people who

01:08:24.880 did some pleading who aren't going to have the same rights of getting things reversed.

01:08:29.000 Oh, here's the story.

01:08:30.100 So the people who pled guilty to the obstruction part, every one of them, every one of them,

01:08:37.900 which is weird, even though it was different courts in different cases, every one of them

01:08:41.720 had to sign something that said, believe it or not, that if the Supreme Court finds that

01:08:47.380 this was never a law in the first place, you can't go free.

01:08:52.140 Now, fact check me on that, but I think I understand it.

01:08:58.280 They actually forced them to sign, you know, under a threat of the courts, they did what

01:09:03.800 the best thing they could do at the time.

01:09:05.460 They signed something that said that even if the law they'd been convicted of turns out

01:09:11.940 to not even be a law, which is what happened, they have to stay in jail.

01:09:19.560 Process that.

01:09:20.440 Let that roll around your head a little bit.

01:09:25.840 This is the only thing that motivates me for this election.

01:09:29.460 Yes, I want a whole bunch of policies to be different.

01:09:32.980 Yes, I want the country to be different.

01:09:35.020 But you have to start here.

01:09:37.680 You start locking up people for that because they're Republican, and let's not pretend.

01:09:43.980 They were Republicans, and they were hunted, and it was done for malicious power purposes

01:09:50.420 to create a situation where Republicans felt they couldn't talk, and they got pretty close

01:09:57.560 to it.

01:09:57.940 So, was it Cernovich who says that the judges should go to jail?

01:10:05.660 Or at least there should be some kind of a process.

01:10:09.280 If Trump gets in office, there should be some kind of a process started to actually put in jail the judges.

01:10:17.480 Now, I've never even heard of such a thing, but I'm completely in favor of it.

01:10:22.960 I think the judges that put the January 6th people in jail, and under these conditions, a law that they knew probably wasn't even a law, I think they need to be in jail.

01:10:35.360 But, let me be completely clear.

01:10:41.860 When people say, you know, Trump's going to get revenge and justice, I don't want to see anything outside of the legal process.

01:10:49.620 Nothing outside of the legal process.

01:10:52.640 You know why?

01:10:55.780 No one's above the law.

01:10:58.160 All right, so this other decision might be even more interesting, but it's going to take a long time for the world to figure out how important this is.

01:11:05.120 That's the so-called Chevron decision from the courts.

01:11:08.720 And that said, that it's reversing the situation we're under, where the Congress could pass a law, but then the specific interpretation of the law and how it's, you know, how it's implemented could be the expert organizations that are most relevant.

01:11:27.160 So, that would allow OSHA, for example, to tell you you all had to wear masks when there was no law to that effect.

01:11:35.120 I think that was one of the examples.

01:11:37.440 So, it's hard to come up with examples, but some say that when you remove all the lawmaking from the so-called experts and the administrative state, as they call it, that that's a good thing.

01:11:49.500 Because the experts are, let's say, corrupt.

01:11:53.340 Corrupt or stupid or political.

01:11:55.640 And that's what we observe.

01:11:57.260 The experts are corrupt or stupid or political.

01:11:59.660 And you can't really trust them to interpret the law.

01:12:03.860 So, instead, it will go back to Congress and judges, I guess, to interpret the law.

01:12:10.420 You know, like the Constitution intended.

01:12:13.660 I don't remember any part of the Constitution that said Congress will make laws and then they will be interpreted by unelected officials.

01:12:24.560 That is so far from being any kind of a process anybody should agree to.

01:12:32.620 Now, I realize why it was done.

01:12:34.780 Because there's lots of ambiguity in laws.

01:12:37.760 And sometimes you just need an expert to, like, cut through the red tape.

01:12:42.360 So, it might be, you know, there's an efficiency gain by doing it.

01:12:45.420 But what happened instead is I think it just got politicized.

01:12:49.820 As soon as it was politicized, you can't do it anymore.

01:12:52.940 As soon as it's politicized, you just got to say, all right, we got to go back to a constitutional framework.

01:12:58.680 Because that's what protects us from the politicization.

01:13:02.080 Politicization.

01:13:03.080 Politicization.

01:13:04.920 The politics.

01:13:08.460 All right.

01:13:09.200 But the most tragic story is that Thomas Massey's wife and mother of four, a childhood sweetheart of 35 years, has suddenly passed away.

01:13:20.120 Now, we don't know the details of that.

01:13:22.660 I would just ask all of you, can you just give him some time?

01:13:28.780 Give him some time.

01:13:29.960 You don't need to be speculating about anything on X.

01:13:33.020 And if you see somebody doing it, you know, maybe politely ask him to hold back on that.

01:13:40.900 I get, you know, I get why the conspiracy theories are floating around.

01:13:45.400 I get it.

01:13:46.620 We all get it.

01:13:48.980 Just give him some time.

01:13:50.320 This isn't the time.

01:13:52.600 You know, let's have some respect for the whole situation.

01:13:58.020 Let's just show a little more respect.

01:13:59.580 You can think things in your head and you can talk to your friends.

01:14:04.000 But putting it on X, it's just a bad look.

01:14:07.920 Right?

01:14:08.020 It's not illegal.

01:14:09.620 You know, I'm not going to come after you if you do it.

01:14:11.820 I'm just saying, maybe find a little humanity here.

01:14:16.560 You know, try to find something that's real and true.

01:14:19.700 And it's not all about politics.

01:14:23.680 All right.

01:14:25.260 Representative Anna Paulina Luna.

01:14:27.080 Still trying to get those her tapes.

01:14:31.080 And she says, you know, the ones that Biden is allegedly talking on.

01:14:38.400 And we saw the transcript, but we haven't heard the audio because people speculate that

01:14:43.460 the only reason they wouldn't let us see it or let us hear it is that he sounds like he's

01:14:48.180 out of it.

01:14:48.560 And Representative Luna says, my question to the American people in the report is, what

01:14:57.160 is on those tapes that Garland is willing to risk becoming a criminal by defying two

01:15:04.000 congressional subpoenas?

01:15:07.400 Now, that's a pretty good question.

01:15:09.100 So you've got the attorney general who is willing to become a criminal to not show you that,

01:15:16.680 to not produce the tapes that you already have the transcript for.

01:15:22.980 We already have the transcript.

01:15:24.600 And we have the, you know, her himself saying that, you know, he was confused, elderly man.

01:15:33.280 So we pretty much know what to expect on the, on the tapes in terms of they're going to be,

01:15:39.740 let's say, more informative than the transcript.

01:15:44.160 We already know that.

01:15:47.300 Why in the world would he risk jail on a principle that's not even a principle?

01:15:53.860 There's actually no real reason for him not to do it.

01:15:57.540 The only reason that anybody can think of, unless they're going to suggest a better reason,

01:16:02.880 is that it would reveal the hoax, the hoax that Biden was always fine behind closed doors.

01:16:10.460 So I think it's exactly what it looks like.

01:16:14.160 The other day, yesterday, I heard something I didn't know before.

01:16:18.520 I forget who said it.

01:16:19.960 I wish I could give them credit.

01:16:21.320 But I didn't know that when Obama left office, unlike other past presidents,

01:16:27.820 he bought a house in Washington.

01:16:31.560 Now he has other homes, I think.

01:16:33.380 But he bought one in Washington.

01:16:36.120 And he lived with Valerie Jarrett.

01:16:40.680 They lived together for like nine months.

01:16:42.440 Now, allegedly, they were working together on some initiatives that he was doing after he was president.

01:16:48.100 But some say that he's the one who's the puppet master behind the scenes.

01:16:54.700 There's definitely some circumstantial evidence that that's the case.

01:17:02.280 You know, this whole idea that you can't debate a liar, that came from somebody who knows how to do this stuff.

01:17:10.600 And I'm thinking it might have been Biden or his circle because they know how to do this stuff.

01:17:16.860 So I would say that it's at least a strong hypothesis.

01:17:23.680 I won't go so far as to say Obama's running the country.

01:17:26.900 I think that's an oversimplification.

01:17:29.260 I think there are entities of power, everything from the military-industrial complex to AIPAC to every billionaire who's giving money.

01:17:38.800 So there are all these different, you know, power sources, and they all have different influence and different topics.

01:17:45.220 You know, it's not all the same.

01:17:47.360 But one does wonder if the politics of the White House is being run by Obama because he knows that they don't have the capability to do it on their own, which we can observe.

01:17:57.760 So I don't know what to think about that, but I'm going to keep watching.

01:18:05.920 Well, do we think that Jill is the bad guy in this whole story?

01:18:11.080 You know, why is Biden clinging to power?

01:18:14.320 Is it because it's too late and there's no practical way to replace him?

01:18:19.800 Maybe.

01:18:21.500 Is it because they gaslighted themselves to the point where they think he's really their best bet?

01:18:27.760 Maybe.

01:18:29.160 Is it because the people who work on the Biden campaign would immediately be unemployed if he stopped running?

01:18:37.600 Obviously.

01:18:40.460 Obviously.

01:18:41.620 The people working on his campaign would be instantly unemployed if anybody else replaced him.

01:18:48.480 Because whoever came in wouldn't use the same team.

01:18:51.620 Even Kamala wouldn't use the same team. 0.83

01:18:53.680 They'd all be fired.

01:18:54.440 And they apparently are pulling the strings.

01:18:58.900 And Jill would be out of the, you know, she would lose all their support.

01:19:03.520 They might have some money problems.

01:19:05.560 By the way, I would not rule out the fact that Joe Biden needs the job for the money.

01:19:12.580 Has anybody ruled that out?

01:19:14.940 To me, it seems obvious.

01:19:16.760 He has to keep working for the money.

01:19:19.460 What's he going to do?

01:19:20.300 Give corporate speeches?

01:19:21.280 He can't do that.

01:19:23.680 He's not capable.

01:19:25.580 But if he just sits there in the White House and they protect them, he gets a paycheck.

01:19:29.500 And then he gets all kinds of government services that, you know, cover all kinds of other needs.

01:19:35.320 He may just need the money.

01:19:38.600 That could be the whole story.

01:19:40.500 And his staff needs the money, too.

01:19:43.240 They might just be working for the cash.

01:19:45.880 Could be that simple.

01:19:46.880 All right.

01:19:54.480 That's what I got for you today.

01:19:56.460 And I'm going to go talk to the locals people privately.

01:20:00.720 My beloved locals subscribers.

01:20:03.340 If you haven't seen today's Dilbert Reborn, which you can see if you're a subscriber on X or on scottadams.locals.com.

01:20:12.480 So, Ratbird is working for the Washington Poop.

01:20:16.340 It's a newspaper, a failing newspaper.

01:20:19.200 And he's become the liaison for the CIA who will tell him what to write.

01:20:24.680 So, that's the storyline that's going on this week.

01:20:28.100 And those of you on YouTube and Rumble and X, I will see you tomorrow.

01:20:33.780 Same place.

01:20:34.280 Choose the line.

01:20:34.780 Choose the line.

01:20:38.040 Save the line. 0.99

01:20:40.580 Save the line. 0.99

01:20:40.940 我要 us.

01:20:41.840 And the lower hand.

01:20:42.740 Save the line. 0.99

01:20:43.480 Save everything.

01:20:44.340 Save everything.

01:20:44.400 Save everything.

01:20:45.480 Save everything.

01:20:46.660 Save everything.

01:20:47.380 Save everything.

01:20:48.320 Save everything.

01:20:48.480 Save everything.

01:20:49.220 Save everything.

01:20:49.340 Save everything.

01:20:50.660 Save everything.

01:20:51.460 Save everything.

01:20:52.660 Save everything.

01:20:53.200 Save everything.

01:20:54.200 Save everything.

01:20:54.940 Save everything.

01:20:55.000 Save everything.

01:20:55.600 Save everything.

01:20:57.180 Save everything.

01:20:58.100 Save everything.

01:20:59.660 Yeah.

01:21:00.160 Save everything.

01:21:01.660 Save everything.

01:21:01.960 Save everything.

01:21:03.040 Save everything.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 29, 2024

Episode 2521 CWSA 06⧸29⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript