A group of people in the Peruvian Amazon have a picture of what they think is a UFO, and it's pretty cool. Plus, there's a new theory about aliens and the world's most advanced civilization, and we're here to explain it.
00:06:31.560I think Putin is smart enough to know that if he can leave this little benefit for Trump, it's like, oh, look, Trump got this guy free in this first day of office.
00:06:41.760And now we have a good relationship with America because we got this one thing, you know, this tiny little thing that was moving in the same direction.
00:06:59.520It's about what direction you're moving.
00:07:00.960And if the direction is moving toward each other, as in, you know what, President Trump, we are going to release this prisoner and it's only because you asked.
00:07:12.260And we'd like the things to be better with the United States.
00:07:15.460Now, that would be just a good zero expense thing for Putin to do.
00:07:20.580So Putin could get some momentum toward some kind of resolution that he would prefer just by giving something that cost him nothing because it didn't cost him anything to give up the hostage.
00:07:32.940I'll call him a hostage because he basically is.
00:07:36.120So I got a feeling this is going to be echoes of Reagan and the Iran hostages.
00:07:42.060That model is too strong in our minds to be ignored.
00:08:08.580You know, if you didn't know anything else about any of the polling anywhere, and if it turned out this was true, you can't believe every poll.
00:08:17.920But it would tell you everything you needed.
00:08:20.580By the way, when we see these nationwide polls where it says Trump's up by 5 or up by 2 in the nation, don't you have to kind of adjust that for the fact that normally the Republicans are behind on the popular vote?
00:08:40.260And even if they win, it's because they got the right combination of states and stuff.
00:08:45.440So if Trump is actually ahead in the overall common vote, doesn't that say landslide?
00:08:53.600Even if he's just slightly ahead in the popular vote overall, that means landslide, right?
00:09:01.260Because the only way you could get there is if you're way ahead in the states that count.
00:09:05.860Well, it's not the only way, but it's highly suggestive of a landslide.
00:09:11.120Don't get yourself too happy because anything could happen.
00:09:13.420So according to Zero Hedge, federal prosecutors are starting to drop some of the obstruction charges from the January 6th prisoners because of the recent Supreme Court ruling.
00:09:29.060So I guess the obstruction charge is not relevant to this situation.
00:09:37.560Basically, the obstruction charge was really stretched by the prosecutors from some Enron situation where obstruction made more sense.
00:09:47.720It was more about destroying evidence.
00:09:52.880And then the Supreme Court, I think, said, nope, that's not an applicable application.
00:09:59.220So that doesn't mean that they'll be free.
00:10:02.200It means that they'll just pursue other charges.
00:10:05.480Now, what does it mean to you if the entire case, the January 6th case against Trump, is that he was trying to obstruct the government from doing his thing?
00:10:17.220And then the Supreme Court said, no, that's not obstruction.
00:10:23.780Doesn't that kind of make the whole thing go away?
00:15:04.860Yeah, the only way it could go the other way is if you learned that the diverse candidates were, in fact, always superior in intellect and capability.
00:15:15.200Now, if that were the case, and I'm not saying it isn't, by the way, but if that were the case, then you would see an increase in quality.
00:15:23.620Because we'd be like, oh, these were people who were left out before for racial discrimination or what else.
00:15:31.180But now they're in, and now they're high-quality people, and they make everything work better.
00:15:38.020On paper, unless the diverse candidates were noticeably smarter and more capable or harder working than the people that would have been in those jobs otherwise,
00:15:49.060it should lead to a decrease in quality, you know, all other things be equal.
00:15:56.180If you assume all people are equal and have the same capabilities, you should see a decrease in capability by forcing yourself to pick from a small group of people
00:16:08.100when there's a great demand for the diverse people.
00:18:42.960The documentary fact, which I talk about all the time, because it's probably the single most important thing you need to understand to understand the news.
00:18:50.500If you only see one side of an argument, you will be persuaded it's true.
00:18:55.500When you look at these audio analyses, you're seeing one side of the argument, you're typically not seeing them paired with somebody saying, but I would have seen this differently, or your audio is off, or there's another way to look at it.
00:19:10.100If you had seen them side-by-side, you probably would have a different opinion.
00:19:16.080So if you saw one person's analysis that you knew was going to exist, whether or not it was true, and you didn't see it next to a counterpoint, what have you seen?
00:21:30.360Although, it does make you think that they should have some acoustic sensors, don't you think?
00:21:38.500Don't you think there should be some kind of acoustic sensors that would pick up a drone buzz just by looking up all the time and say, uh-oh, you're a drone buzz, and then be able to kind of spot it or triangulate it?
00:21:51.760So, maybe there's some equipment that needs to be invented in the age of drones.
00:21:55.840I think they have drone-blocking technology, but not drone-detection technology.
00:22:02.280In other words, the Secret Service probably had, you know, a portable device to disable a drone, which you can do by taking out a radio signal, but probably not want to detect one, which would be a little harder, or maybe more rare, not harder.
00:22:19.180And then, of course, let's see if you could have predicted this.
00:23:09.940Now, the other thing that people are asking is, why in the world is he the only 20-year-old who is known to be a computer programmer type and was on the Steam Gaming Network, and yet he has no social media?
00:23:26.500And the only photos we can get of them are one taken by the snipers the day of, and another one when he was like 14 years old.
00:23:37.200And everything in between is missing except for that BlackRock video where he just happened to be in the shot.
00:23:44.940That's the most suspicious thing I've ever seen in my life.
00:23:48.120And I know people are asking, are they hiding the fact that he was trans?
00:23:52.340Because if you see his haircut in the day of the event, he's got long hair for the first time because he didn't have long hair as a teenager.
00:25:52.000According to the Wall Street Journal, the Butler County Emergency Services and the Secret Service have different explanations of what happened.
00:26:07.020Do you remember my hypothesis, the Dilbert filter?
00:26:10.200I said that when you have three entities, the Secret Service, the local police, and then the local police sniper unit, which was a different local police.
00:26:22.540It was a nearby jurisdiction, that when you put three people in charge of a thing, your odds of a bureaucratic miscommunication just go through the roof.
00:26:36.140If you've got two different entities that have to communicate, you're already in trouble.
00:26:41.020But if you have two of them that seem like they're the same, but they're not the same, they're both local police, but they're from different places, you're just automatically introducing error into the system.
00:26:51.420So you don't have to be some kind of Dan Bongino expert to know that there was going to be a massive possibility of error as soon as you had three people.
00:27:16.040Tell me who else predicted that the real problem would come down to the police and the Secret Service disagreeing on who was supposed to be doing what.
00:27:29.880It was the most predictable thing about this.
00:27:33.340Now, that's based on the Dilbert filter, that it's just bureaucracy and pointy-haired boss and people being lazy and selfish.
00:27:40.640Do you remember when I said maybe the, maybe the snipers, the police snipers, maybe they took a place inside the building because it was hot on the roof?
00:28:00.080And then they believed that the roof would be covered by the other snipers.
00:28:07.260So in other words, the other snipers could see the rooftop and then the snipers that decided to be in the cooler inside place said, oh, look, we've got this window with a good view of the venue.
00:28:37.220So one unit believed that the roof slant would have partially obscured the sniper's view so that there was something about the roof slant that makes no sense whatsoever, does it?
00:30:10.220But it sure looks like incompetence is 80% of the answer.
00:30:16.300But we don't know that's the whole answer.
00:30:20.200Now, as smart people have been saying, it doesn't need to be that the incompetence was necessarily part of the plan.
00:30:28.860But it could be that knowing there was incompetence or creating a situation where there might be more incompetence, such as using the non-regular people, such as taking the most experienced people and moving them to cover the NATO summit, moving them to cover Jill Biden's trip, both of which happened.
00:30:49.840Those might be just normal bureaucratic decisions that turned down tragic.
00:30:54.720But let's talk about the conspiracy hypothesis, which could involve some planned incompetence.
00:31:04.840In other words, you could imagine that the plot involved finding a weakness in the security and then striking when there was weakness.
00:31:14.680So they might have, you know, the inside, the idea of an insider being involved is still alive.
00:32:13.540Now, many of you asked, what about that alleged FBI assistant director who was in the stands behind Trump and seemed mysteriously not shaken up by the incident and simply filmed it?
00:32:25.020And people said, my God, she must be in on the plot because she was the only one who didn't look surprised.
00:33:20.900If you had your phone ready and it was sort of already on video because you probably were, you know, every now and then doing video of the the event.
00:33:28.860Wouldn't you know that your angle on this event, which was clearly a world event, would be needed?
00:33:38.320You would want as much video from every angle as possible for the benefit of the country.
00:33:44.100You want the public to see what happened.
00:33:46.940You want the Secret Service to be able to see if there's any extra thing that can be gleaned from it.
00:33:51.900And probably she had an angle that was not going to be covered by anything else.
00:33:55.360If you put me in that situation, I would have filmed.
00:34:00.320If you put me in that situation, I would have stayed there and filmed because I would have thought it was so important.
00:34:06.840To have that angle, especially since she didn't know if Trump was OK by that time.
00:34:13.420I think I would have stayed and I think I would have just put the camera on it, even though even though the bullets were flying,
00:34:19.380because I would have felt some level of importance to it that seemed greater than my physical safety at that moment.
00:34:26.920Now, I love to say that because it makes me sound brave, but it would be more about the the largeness of the moment.
00:34:35.440Would make me default to what has to be done versus what I want to be done.
00:34:42.160Yes, when situation really goes off the rails like that, your brain can flip into what you have to do versus what you want to do.
00:34:51.500What you want to do is run and what I would want to do is run.
00:34:55.560But sometimes you do what you have to do because you have to do it.
00:34:59.420There doesn't need to be a better reason.
00:35:01.720So let's just say she knew what she had to do.
00:35:05.460What's wrong with that as an explanation?
00:35:07.400Now, again, I can't tell you what her motives are or anything like that, but there is a perfectly reasonable explanation that she just saw the moment.
00:35:18.160She just felt the moment and did what I'm glad she did, which is get another video of another angle.
00:35:42.000I don't know if any of that's true, but, uh, uh, Elon Musk just deleted crowd strike from all of his company systems.
00:35:49.280One of the things that I heard about it that I don't know is true is that Trump had once complained that crowd strike was owned by the Ukrainian oligarch.
00:36:10.700Now, it's something that Trump apparently had claimed in prior years when crowd strike was part of that, uh, the group that looked at the, um, the DNC hack and decided it was Russia.
00:36:23.240Uh, and people like me said, huh, that's convenient.
00:36:26.600And so the information that nobody gets to see, but you, and we don't quite trust you are saying that, uh, it's Russia, which is very convenient.
00:36:36.740And so everything about that sounded like bullshit to me, but I didn't know the part about the Ukrainian oligarch.
00:36:46.180So I'm, I'm, I'm not sure that's true.
00:36:49.180So don't assume that I'm saying it's true.
00:36:51.520It's just, uh, I'll look for a confirmation of that.
00:36:55.100Anyway, uh, Daniel Dale, the fact checker for CNN, uh, you know how I was telling you that when he was mentioning his fact checks on Trump at the big speech that I could tell that the, the first several things he mentioned were actually wrong fact checks.
00:37:14.440And even I knew, I mean, just by paying attention to the news, I knew, Oh, well, that's not true.
00:37:20.880Or, Oh, well, you left out the context.
00:37:23.380If you put it in the context, it would look different.
00:37:25.820Oh, that's not the way they collect that data anymore.
00:37:32.120You know, I'm just mildly well-informed on the news, but imagine why you would know if you were an expert on any of the domains that he talked about.
00:37:43.700Uh, so, so representative Mike Waltz at the convention gave his own speech and he said that, uh, Biden was focused on building electric tanks, which is probably not the best, you know, power for a tank.
00:38:02.880Um, and, uh, Daniel Dale, uh, debunked that and said, that's not true that Biden was focusing on tanks.
00:38:10.180So Daniel Dale basically makes Mike Waltz look like an idiot by fact checking him on TV, but then CNN made the mistake of interviewing Mike Waltz.
00:38:21.780And that's where things went, went south for CNN because Mike Waltz, it turns out is really good at communicating, really good at communicating.
00:38:32.300And he decided to use his time on CNN to try to repair his reputation, which you can't do.
00:38:39.800I mean, once the cat's out of the bag, it lives on the internet forever, as he pointed out.
00:38:43.420But he went through the details of how, if Daniel Dale had not immediately assumed it was untrue, if he had spent just a minute Googling it, he would have found out it's completely true.
00:38:56.140And Waltz had the receipts, he gave the, he gave the sources, things you could check.
00:39:01.740And sure enough, Mike Waltz was completely right, but he got fact checked.
00:39:07.500Now this is a version of the gel man amnesia, you know, gel man amnesia.
00:39:13.260I talk about all the time where if you're an expert in a domain, you look at the news and you go, well, that news is wrong.
00:40:43.400So he basically has that one speed, but they also brought him out to dump on Biden because, you know, the big push from Pelosi and the Democrats is to cause enough pain for Biden that he'll quit.
00:41:00.260And having Carl Bernstein on is, does anybody know if it's Stein or Stein?
00:41:07.440I can't just keep saying his name wrong in public.
00:41:46.540I never say people's names incorrectly on purpose.
00:41:49.360I just, I have trouble with some of these names.
00:41:53.040But anyway, he's the kind of guy who doesn't have anything special to add, but you bring him out just to bolster a message that you were saying anyway.
00:42:00.340So he's saying that Biden realizes the current state of his candidacy is likely unsustainable.
00:42:09.080Now, do you think that Carl knows what Biden is thinking when he realizes that his candidacy is unsustainable?
00:42:18.780And do you think that if Biden really, in the real world, if he thought his campaign was unsustainable, he would be fighting to stay in?
00:42:27.260So do you think Carl is telling us the truth, that the guy who knows his campaign is unsustainable is going to do the opposite of what that knowledge would lead you to do?
00:42:44.980To me, it sounds like Biden wants to stay in.
00:42:49.400And everybody's trying to make a story that he's leaving.
00:42:53.660Now, it seems to me, and other smart people have noted this, that it seems that the Pelosi plan, let's call it that, she seems to be leading it, maybe Obama, but Pelosi seems key to it, is to have enough people say he's leaving so that everybody believes he's leaving, which would make all of his funding dry up.
00:43:14.980Which would make everybody abandon ship, because you don't want to be the last one on the sinking ship.
00:43:20.000So it looks like they're trying to drain of them support with a hoax.
00:44:39.320But he says that the president didn't recognize him.
00:44:42.540And that's another turtle on another fence post, says Halperin.
00:44:46.000And the paradox is the more Pelosi uses the tactics to humiliate Joe, the more this vain, proud, biggest chip-on-the-shoulder man gets his back up.
00:47:22.280If he leaves the race now, he's going to cripple Democrats, even if there's a new candidate.
00:47:29.720So the new candidate, whoever it is, Kamala or somebody else, is going to be so crippled by how long Biden waited that the blame will be on him, whether he loses personally or he waited too long to get out and cause the other person to lose.
00:47:46.580So there are basically two ways to lose, and both of them would be blamed on Biden.
00:47:52.280Even if he's replaced, he gets blamed because the replacement came too late.
00:48:12.260Do you think after everything you said about Trump and the personal animus and the ego that he's put into it, do you think he could lose to Trump and lose in such a weak way?
00:48:24.100Because he'd be leaving in a way that made him physically and mentally weaker than Trump.
00:48:28.640These are guys who have been saying in public, I'm going to beat you up behind the bleachers.
00:48:34.400They've literally, it's been a dick measuring contest for years, and you think one of them is going to say, you know what?
00:48:40.440As it turns out, I'm physically and mentally weaker than Trump, so you should maybe just think about him.
00:48:46.600I mean, you wouldn't say that second part.
00:48:48.000But no, there's no way that he can admit he has, in fact, been physically and mentally weaker than Trump.
00:48:59.020How about leaving the race now confesses that he controlled the nuclear triad while he was mentally degraded.
00:49:05.240If he's mentally degraded enough to leave the race, that means that right now, today, he's in charge of the nuclear triad while he has dementia.
00:50:56.480But I'm going to go with my original prediction.
00:50:59.420My original prediction is they can't get him out of there.
00:51:05.040And that what they will do is they will let him run, but out of practicality, they're going to say, hey, everybody, you're really voting for Kamala.
00:51:16.040Just understand you're voting for Kamala.
00:51:34.940Apparently, the Gateway Pundit's reporting that the DNC Rules Committee wants to do a virtual roll call to nominate Biden because otherwise there'd be this embarrassing public display.
00:51:48.060Man, can Democrats lose harder than they're losing this week?
00:51:51.300Have you ever seen such an enormous gap between how one party is doing and how the other party is doing in the same week?