Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 23, 2024


Episode 2544 CWSA 07⧸23⧸24


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 20 minutes

Words per minute

148.22408

Word count

12,002

Sentence count

832

Harmful content

Misogyny

27

sentences flagged

Toxicity

12

sentences flagged

Hate speech

16

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Trump s New York civil fraud case is back on the table, and Biden s health is in question. Plus, the latest on Biden s recent trip to Las Vegas. Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget
00:00:06.000 Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience
00:00:11.040 right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and
00:00:16.680 simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots
00:00:21.740 and top-tier table games. Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots
00:00:27.220 that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino.
00:00:32.820 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the
00:00:37.920 thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you
00:00:43.140 can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino? Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario,
00:00:49.320 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over, physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply. See
00:00:56.340 goldennuggetcasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:01:02.740 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:01:07.240 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,
00:01:13.420 you're richer than you think.
00:01:14.500 To coffee with Scott Adams. And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can
00:01:21.840 even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass,
00:01:27.260 a tanker, a chalice, a styon, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your
00:01:32.220 favorite liquid, like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine
00:01:37.060 that makes everything better. It's gold. Simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go.
00:01:50.600 Delightful. Delightful. Well, are you ready for a two whiteboard extravaganza? The show of shows,
00:01:58.620 something that you've never seen before. I guarantee you that this show will have at least a few surprises.
00:02:05.280 Now, some of you know what I mean. Some of you don't. But we'll find out how this goes.
00:02:13.320 Story number one. Trump's going to appeal his $454 million New York civil fraud case thing.
00:02:22.620 And his lawyers are going to say, and this is the Letitia James one where he allegedly did something
00:02:29.600 with no. Is this one where he overvalued some property and there were no victims and the bankers
00:02:37.820 said, yeah, we'd love to do business with him again. And for that, he owed half a billion dollars.
00:02:43.440 So, you know, the justice system.
00:02:45.380 So, his lawyers are going to say there were no victims and no losses. And if appellants' conduct
00:02:56.100 constituted fraud under whatever statute, then that word has no meaning, et cetera.
00:03:03.440 So, I don't know how this really works. I'm not sure how many appeals opportunities he would have
00:03:10.320 for this case. But doesn't it have to get out in New York before he has a chance? I mean, the whole
00:03:15.900 problem is that if you try Trump in New York, he's going to get convicted of anything. You can
00:03:23.640 convict Trump of murdering JFK. It wouldn't matter if there was any evidence. I don't think. I think
00:03:31.700 just New York jury is all it would take. So, basically, isn't the whole game to get it to
00:03:37.460 some higher court where it's out of New York, right? I don't know. Well, if it delays things,
00:03:45.520 or at least delays him paying that money, but I suppose there might be some interest if he loses.
00:03:52.300 I'm sure he's got some advantage in this. And at the very least, he can say it's appealed.
00:04:00.180 All right, we're going to have to talk about Biden's health. There are many so far unsubstantiated
00:04:05.640 stories. You're going to have to tell me in the comments if anything changes dramatically while
00:04:12.640 I'm talking, specifically about Biden's health. So, if you hear anything, just break into the
00:04:19.720 comments and I'll let you know. But the reports that are starting to sound credible, because it's
00:04:29.720 coming from multiple independent journalists, it's coming from multiple sources for each of them.
00:04:35.400 And it seems to be something like this, that when you believed that Biden got COVID in Las Vegas,
00:04:45.320 that what might have happened is something worse than COVID, and something that looked like a major
00:04:50.180 stroke, which caused the Las Vegas medical and police people to organize quickly, you know, on command.
00:04:59.700 And they were going to take Biden to John Hopkins Hospital. And then there was a change to taking
00:05:08.400 him to Air Force One. And now the story is, and I would say the credibility on this is, I don't know,
00:05:15.220 50 to 80 percent, it feels like to me. I don't think this is 100 percent sure what's happening.
00:05:25.520 But the idea was that it wasn't necessarily a full stroke. There's something that looks like a full
00:05:34.320 stroke. There's a lesser condition. Something called a transient ischemic. Ischemic?
00:05:45.220 I love saying words I've never said before out loud. Ischemic? Ischemic? I-S-C-H-E-M-I-C. I'm
00:05:55.520 going to say ischemic. That feels right. So if you have one of those, apparently it can look like a
00:06:03.740 stroke. But if it resolves itself in a few minutes, it's more obviously this, you know,
00:06:11.560 transient thing. So again, we don't know if any of this is true. This is just based on reporting that
00:06:17.620 comes from sources I take seriously, but we don't quite know.
00:06:22.140 And then the idea would be whether or not he ever had any COVID, we don't know. I mean,
00:06:29.120 that might have been a cover story. Maybe not.
00:06:31.120 And then it just keeps getting better. I don't know how they can make this story
00:06:40.260 seem any sketchier. I mean, everything about Biden and everything about the assassination
00:06:47.820 attempt on Trump have the same weird quality where every time you learn something, it raises
00:06:54.820 a bigger question. Like, I'm just going to make this one up, but this is how it feels.
00:07:01.180 It's like, and we found out, you know, the name of the sniper that took the shot and it killed
00:07:09.500 him. And you're like, oh, wow, great. Finally, we're getting some answers. What's his name?
00:07:14.380 Elvis Presley. Wait, what? You mean the real Elvis? The actual Elvis? Is Elvis his life?
00:07:21.220 How's he? And then you have to like, wait till tomorrow. And there's just always some answer
00:07:28.520 that makes you go, what? So my favorite one so far is that Biden called into the Wilmington,
00:07:37.940 Delaware campaign headquarters while Kamala Harris was there. And they put him on the speakerphone
00:07:44.100 and he gives a little talk, sounding quite good, sounding quite healthy. And, you know,
00:07:51.440 not, he slurred his words a little bit, but, you know, sort of baseline, you know, nothing special.
00:08:00.620 And what did people say? Did people say, oh, thank you. Thank you for confirming that he's alive
00:08:07.900 and well, and that he's very much behind Kamala Harris rising to power. So all of your questions
00:08:15.740 are answered, right? What? What? That didn't answer all your questions? People, you heard him
00:08:23.500 with your own ears. He was perfectly cogent. If I were to describe it, sharp as a tack. Sharp as a tack.
00:08:35.760 Healthy for sure. I mean, he's on the mend. His doctor said so the other day. He's like way better.
00:08:42.180 His symptoms are, we don't even remember the symptoms now. So long ago, he's so much better.
00:08:49.140 Yeah, he's doing a little, he's doing some yoga and he's riding his bike. We can't show you pictures.
00:08:55.820 No, no, no pictures. Now, do you have questions about this? Oh, oh, oh, you're, you're wondering
00:09:04.340 why in the age of video, a president of the United States who probably has access to Wi-Fi?
00:09:16.860 Why, why would he make a phone call? Knowing that everybody would listen to the phone call
00:09:23.460 and say something like, oh, why aren't you on video? Shouldn't there be at least a still photo?
00:09:32.200 Now, I get that you don't want to get out of your pajamas, but they couldn't comb your hair and put
00:09:37.500 a shirt on you and put you out behind the desk, you know, just for a still photo, nothing. And so
00:09:44.580 they managed to make it even worse because here's the question we're left with.
00:09:48.520 Was that really him? Yeah. The first thing I thought was, is this AI or, you know, some kind
00:09:57.720 of prerecorded AI thing, you know, where I can imagine somebody had a bunch of sentences
00:10:03.300 and then they had a button to push and they were all sort of generic responses.
00:10:08.620 And if you listen to it, everything Biden says could have been said as a response to almost
00:10:16.020 anything. So he does his, you know, little opening thing where he, you know, just talks
00:10:21.580 like Joe Biden for a while. So that doesn't require any interaction. But then there is a
00:10:27.020 part where Kamala later says, are you still there, Joe? And then he, he comes in with,
00:10:32.820 the, I don't remember if I wrote it down, but he just had some, some generic responses
00:10:39.220 like I'm always behind you kid. And I'm thinking that wasn't exactly what you'd expect in response
00:10:49.140 to that. And then there was another one that was like sort of a little bit generic. And
00:10:54.740 I thought to myself, did they actually plan and execute a recorded, maybe, maybe AI, maybe
00:11:04.100 something else, but a recorded piece, which they stitched together to make it look like
00:11:09.680 it was interacting. Now it did not sound like an AI voice to me specifically because at one
00:11:17.880 point there was some throat clearing and you kind of think they wouldn't do the throat clearing
00:11:22.860 or at least they wouldn't make it sound completely believable. And, you know, he sort of
00:11:29.740 slurred some words and I thought, well, would you do that if you were making a, if you were making
00:11:35.840 a fake and you wanted it to sound healthy, would you have any slurred words? And I thought, maybe
00:11:42.500 you might. And then I thought, I don't think there's any commercial version of AI that could
00:11:48.600 make a voice that good. You can still tell the AIs, but if there's a version where nobody can tell
00:11:56.200 the difference, you wouldn't know about it yet, would you? And don't you think that our CIA, for
00:12:03.280 example, would have had to for national security, already created close ties with all the major AI
00:12:11.280 developers in the US at least. And don't you think that they've already said to them, here's the deal.
00:12:19.600 We will let you operate. In other words, we won't be a problem. But if you come up with anything that
00:12:26.220 has genuine military importance, you tell us and we'll decide what to do with it. One of those things
00:12:34.460 would be perfect AI voice copying. Because at the moment, you can still kind of pick it out.
00:12:43.780 What if it were perfect? Like what we heard? The Biden recorded sounded to me perfectly like his
00:12:51.900 voice, like it would be hard for me to imagine it was AI. But do you think that the best AI company
00:12:59.220 hasn't made a perfect one yet? Or do you think that you couldn't take additional samples and just keep
00:13:07.700 working on it until it was perfect? Or maybe take a sound engineer who gets it almost perfect and then
00:13:14.580 tweaks out some pauses and stuff until it is perfect? If you were a state actor. So we are left with the
00:13:23.180 possibility that you cannot rule out that he was not the voice that we heard. It can't be ruled out.
00:13:31.760 Now, I can't tell you what the odds are. Is it over 50%? Probably not. I wouldn't put it over 50%. But
00:13:41.820 we're living in a world of zero trust. And so if you think that you're sure that was a real voice,
00:13:48.560 I don't know. I'd wait. So lots of questions to be answered. Apparently, Biden's scheduled for the
00:13:59.680 return today. Has anybody seen video that you know is him? Yeah. So I will remind you that
00:14:10.540 it's only citizens who are presumed innocent. The government is presumed guilty.
00:14:18.560 If they do something that looks this sketchy, you have to say, I think you're guilty. You're
00:14:24.760 going to have to show me some video. Your government has an obligation to prove itself and be transparent
00:14:30.340 all the time. When they're not transparent, your most reasonable explanation for why, given
00:14:38.520 that being transparent would be to their advantage if they didn't have anything to hide.
00:14:43.480 So a non-transparency has to be assumed as guilt, as a working assumption. You know, not
00:14:50.440 pick up your gun and send them to jail guilt. But as a working assumption, you should assume
00:14:55.480 they're guilty. That's the most reasonable way to play the odds. All right. So now the New
00:15:03.380 York Post and others reported that Biden was threatened with the 25th Amendment. Now, do you
00:15:10.520 think that's the right way to phrase that? Because, you know, you could tell this Biden story as a
00:15:17.720 coup and it would fit every definition of it. And I wouldn't disagree with you. It does look like a
00:15:25.300 coup. It looks like non-elected people are deciding who runs and it could get worse. But if he is
00:15:34.300 genuinely degraded, you know, you can say it's bad that we got to this point. But once you get to this
00:15:41.060 point, is it really blackmail or threatening to say you're going to do a 25th Amendment? Or is that
00:15:49.160 more just like information? Because if you're literally going to do the 25th Amendment because
00:15:55.740 you just don't have any choice, he's just that gone? Would you blame anybody for saying to him,
00:16:03.100 look, we just have to be honest, we have to do the 25th Amendment if you don't quit? Is that a threat?
00:16:14.460 I think that's a judgment call, isn't it? So you could tell this story as people who may have done
00:16:21.120 terrible things in hiding his condition up to this point, may do terrible things in the future,
00:16:27.200 may be terrible people. But when you get to that point, when he is legitimately, you know, done,
00:16:34.480 I don't know that that's a threat. That's just sort of like trying to explain to him what the situation
00:16:40.260 is. So, but we don't know what kind of shape he's in. We'll find out.
00:16:46.320 The most suspicious thing is that Kamala seems to have wrapped up the nomination
00:16:53.500 in a very non-democratic way. She quite cleverly branded her potential opponents as vice president
00:17:02.900 picks, and she's already hired somebody to vet her vice president picks for the things she has not been
00:17:09.500 nominated for. Now, if that sounds to you like there's any possibility someone else is going to get
00:17:15.980 the nomination. I think you'd be wrong because she's already pulled in a gazillion dollars of 1.00
00:17:23.060 extra funding, like some record that we can barely believe, as in we do barely believe it, meaning there
00:17:30.780 might be some money laundering or other shenanigans involved because it's so much so fast. It's just
00:17:36.960 hard to believe. So now we know that the Democrats rigged the primary with Bernie Sanders back in
00:17:46.400 Hillary's time. We know that Biden's primary this year was rigged in the sense that nobody else could
00:17:53.780 run against him. And now this one seems to be rigged again because even though Obama said, hey,
00:18:01.540 there should be some speedy little mini primary. But other people like Jen Psaki even spoke of it as 1.00
00:18:09.700 nothing but a way to coronate the obvious choice, Kamala. And I think other people said, nobody's going
00:18:17.620 to take the job of jumping over the DEI hire, you know, if I can be crude about it. Because Kamala's race 1.00
00:18:27.600 and gender are largely why she is in the job and largely why she can't be replaced. So 1.00
00:18:36.160 it looks like she has clinched it and whatever they do from now on is just cover a story. Would you agree
00:18:45.720 that that's an accurate characterization? Whatever happens from now on is just a cover story.
00:18:51.160 Yeah. So they might do some kind of mini primary. You know what? Here's what I think is the most
00:18:59.920 likely outcome. The DNC will say, all right, you have two days to register to be a candidate against
00:19:08.640 Kamala Harris. And if you do, we'll have a series of debates and then the delegates will get to vote.
00:19:15.500 And then you know what will happen? Two days will go by and nobody will register.
00:19:24.260 And if anybody tried, they'd say, no, you don't want to register. Yeah. I was actually thinking,
00:19:28.740 I was thinking maybe I will. No, no, you don't want to register. No, I'm sure I do. I thought I'd
00:19:36.060 give it a run. No, you don't. No, you don't want to register. So that would be one way to play it.
00:19:45.500 Let's see. Let's see if we understand what the system looks like. Now, one of the things that is
00:19:51.700 fascinating about this past year is that with the help of smart people who help us understand what
00:19:58.540 the system looks like, I'm talking about your Glenn Greenwalds, your Michael Schellenbergers,
00:20:04.840 your Mike Benz, your Mike Cernoviches, your Jack Posabek, your Tucker Carlson's. You're starting to see a
00:20:14.420 picture of the machine. And I don't know if we see it clearly, but let me tell you what it looks
00:20:22.780 like. So that's all I can say for sure is that this is what it looks like. Is it real? I don't know.
00:20:32.740 Let's go to the whiteboard.
00:20:33.620 Claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament.
00:20:35.620 I've been visualizing my match all week.
00:20:38.120 She was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car on her backhand side.
00:20:44.420 Good thing Claudia's with Intact, the insurer with the largest network of auto service centers in
00:20:49.200 the country. Everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her way in a rental car
00:20:53.580 in no time.
00:20:54.460 I made it to my tournament and lost in the first round.
00:20:57.920 But you got there on time. Intact Insurance, your auto service ace. Certain conditions apply.
00:21:03.300 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners, I started wondering,
00:21:08.640 is every fabulous item I see from Winners? Like that woman over there with the designer 0.90
00:21:14.120 jeans. Are those from Winners? Ooh, or those beautiful gold earrings? Did she pay full price?
00:21:20.260 Or that leather tote? Or that cashmere sweater? Or those knee-high boots? That dress? That jacket?
00:21:25.420 Those shoes? Is anyone paying full price for anything? Stop wondering. Start winning.
00:21:31.200 Winners. Find fabulous for less.
00:21:41.200 If we can get this lighting just right, this will be amazing. All right. I have to angle
00:21:48.900 it a little bit because of my lighting issues. But here's what it looks like. It looks like
00:21:56.160 there's some group of people in power. We don't know exactly who. But almost certainly
00:22:01.080 it would include intelligence people. Now, not necessarily all of them employed by some
00:22:08.940 intelligence agency. It might be ex-members who are still affiliated. But some group of
00:22:14.320 people who have enough power that they can blackmail a handful of billionaires who are the
00:22:21.020 primary funders of any candidate. Now, have you noticed that a lot of the people who are the
00:22:27.580 biggest billionaire donors, especially on the Democrat side, appear to you suspiciously like
00:22:33.980 the most blackmailable people you could ever think of in your life? Now, I'm not making a specific 0.81
00:22:39.560 accusation. I'm just saying, huh, if I were to try to pick people that I knew a little bit about,
00:22:47.500 but not a lot about, and it was my job to guess which of them would be more likely to be blackmailable,
00:22:55.260 I might end up luckily picking some of the people who are the biggest donors at the moment.
00:23:02.780 And I ask myself, why are other billionaires giant donors as well?
00:23:09.960 Let's say, I'll just take one example. Sam Bankman Freed. All right. So I could use him
00:23:15.500 because he's convicted. Do you think that there was ever anybody in any kind of intelligence
00:23:21.660 or power position who knew exactly how vulnerable he was? Maybe. Maybe they did.
00:23:31.980 Who knows? It's just suspiciously, it looks like billionaires either can be blackmailed for something
00:23:39.100 they may have done in their personal life. But I'm not sure you'd call this blackmail,
00:23:44.780 but you would assume that anybody who has a gigantic international business would need some people who
00:23:51.580 also have giant power to either not get in their way or help some things get out of their way.
00:23:59.180 So at some point, certain types of billionaires, I think it depends on what kind of business you're in,
00:24:06.940 they really need people in important positions to say yes, and it could mean billions of dollars for them.
00:24:14.620 In other words, they might get a gigantic multi-billion dollar contract if they give
00:24:20.540 10 to 100 million dollars a year to the candidate of the top people's choice.
00:24:27.580 Now, am I saying this is the way it works? I don't know. I'm saying this is the way it looks like it works.
00:24:34.780 I'm saying that the gears of the machine seem to have revealed themselves in this latest situation.
00:24:42.860 Because we saw that when I say in friends, I would include Pelosi as an in friend,
00:24:49.420 in Obama, Hillary Clinton. So they would be the in friends group. Now, they don't always agree with
00:24:56.300 each other on everything, probably. But collectively, they would be the ones that would be working with
00:25:02.300 the people who almost certainly blackmail on the people who are the biggest donors, in my opinion.
00:25:08.460 And they get to select the candidate, as we just watched them do with Kamala Harris,
00:25:15.180 because they said, Joe Biden, you'll never get any more money. And that was the end of it.
00:25:19.660 So you don't have to wonder who's in charge. The big donors just showed you that the machinery
00:25:25.900 revealed itself. And then, of course, the media belongs to the Democrats, so it can sell pretty much
00:25:33.820 anything. And if that model isn't good enough, if having the top secret people in power, blackmail big
00:25:41.980 donors to choose the candidate that they want, meaning the top people want, having the media sell
00:25:49.020 it, if that's not enough, they have a second method, they can rig the election. I'll give you
00:25:57.260 one. And by the way, everything I'm saying here is not to be construed as a fact.
00:26:02.540 I'm telling you what it looks like. Is that clear? I'm just saying this is what it looks like.
00:26:11.980 So Mike Cernovich was recently on Tucker's show. And I haven't watched it all, but I did see this
00:26:20.140 one quote. So this is Mike Cernovich explaining one of the potential risks of the upcoming election.
00:26:28.380 So Mike Cernovich. Nobody can know. Tucker asked him what's going to happen in the election. And Mike
00:26:35.900 says, nobody can know because the Democrats have all these tricks up their sleeves that people aren't
00:26:41.180 prepared for. For example, what they're doing now with motor voter registration is they're registering
00:26:47.340 illegal immigrants who come into the country and they'll just harvest those ballots. It's really 1.00
00:26:52.700 easy to do. We have 10 or 11 million people in it over the past couple of years on the Biden
00:26:58.620 administration. You register them all to vote. It doesn't matter because they're not going to vote.
00:27:06.780 So there's no voter prosecution. Oh, I didn't think about that. So you don't have to worry about the
00:27:14.460 voters getting in trouble because they're not actually going to vote.
00:27:19.820 So there's no voter prosecution and there won't be any record of voter fraud by them. But you have
00:27:26.140 all these names now in a swing state. Remember, the elections are decided not by popular vote. It's
00:27:31.740 decided by 50 to 100,000 votes in three to four states. So, and then he talks through how all you
00:27:39.180 need is small numbers to tip the election. Now, is that accurate? I don't know. I don't know.
00:27:49.340 But I'll tell you what's obvious. What's obvious is if the people at the top actually exist,
00:27:56.860 if this is a real concept, if they haven't figured out how to rig our election yet,
00:28:02.220 well, it's just a matter of time. It means they're not trying hard enough because these would be the
00:28:09.660 people who had all the skills and all the access and all the capability. So if they didn't rig the
00:28:16.220 election, but they were willing to do all this, how does that make sense? So if you accept that the
00:28:23.420 center part is reality, and again, I'm not saying it is, I'm saying it's just what it looks like.
00:28:28.940 If you accept that they would blackmail people to get the candidates they want and they're really
00:28:34.220 the power, then it also makes sense since they have all the tools they would need.
00:28:39.260 It would be trivial actually. And we still don't understand why there are electronic voting machines
00:28:44.300 at all. Like nobody can figure out, okay, it doesn't seem to be cheaper. It doesn't seem to be
00:28:51.180 more credible to the public. It doesn't seem to be faster. It doesn't seem to be less maintenance.
00:28:59.180 So there might be a reason that I'm not aware of, but I've been asking for years and nobody's ever
00:29:05.020 offered even an explanation. Never. Not once. Nobody has ever said, Scott, you idiot. Let me explain how
00:29:13.500 this works. You have to have the machines because, and then they tell me why. Never happened. Not even once.
00:29:20.940 Anyway, so if you imagine that the center part is obvious and we've seen it in action this week,
00:29:28.940 then it seems equally obvious that they would have the option for rigging an election,
00:29:33.820 whether it was ours or anybody else they got their mitts into. And then it also makes sense if you
00:29:41.580 believe that JFK was assassinated by members of the intelligence people, that it would be the same 0.81
00:29:48.380 capability, same people, same mindset, and that they would have the option to try to take out a candidate.
00:29:57.180 So what we witnessed
00:29:58.380 was something that looks exactly like this picture. Meaning that, is it true? Is that an accurate
00:30:09.820 picture of what's happening in the world? I don't know. I mean, I genuinely don't know.
00:30:15.100 But if I had to make a bet, you know, bet your life, I think I'd be leaning toward betting my life
00:30:28.540 that this is closer than whatever you were trained to believe. I'm going to make a little diversion
00:30:35.820 right now, just for fun. Robert Cialdini, who wrote the book Influence, talks about a study
00:30:45.740 where you could get people to change their opinions by asking them to write down the opposite argument
00:30:52.460 from their opinion. And then they would check back with them in a year and they found out that
00:30:57.260 statistically there were a lot of them who had changed their opinion. Even though they had received
00:31:01.820 no new information, they had just been forced to write their opinion. And what that shows
00:31:11.420 is that making somebody create a part of their brain, which is really a physical structure based
00:31:19.340 on your experience, you know, the physical brain changes. That's how you can remember anything.
00:31:23.980 There's something physically that's different. So if you make somebody write an essay that's the
00:31:30.940 opposite of their opinion, it starts taking up more real estate in their brain than their original
00:31:36.620 opinion. And it turns out that we're very much like AI. We're large language models. So whatever
00:31:44.700 pattern is most dominant in your brain, you think is your opinion. I hate to tell you, this is a
00:31:51.660 hypnotist point of view. You think it's your opinion because it's the thing you thought about the most
00:31:56.700 and has the most structure in your brain. It's not your opinion. It's just the thing that took up the
00:32:01.420 most space in your brain. It's just, it's like a machine. If you have more gears of the machine in
00:32:07.660 one direction, that's where you are. And then you put this rationalization on top of it that you changed
00:32:12.860 your mind for reasons. No, it wasn't reasons. Did you know that when in the OJ trial, when they said,
00:32:19.900 if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit. And you said to yourself, wow, that's clever. And then experts
00:32:26.620 later, like me said, you know, it's been proven that rhymes are more persuasive. And you say to
00:32:33.500 yourself, oh, rhymes are more persuasive. But I'm here to tell you that the reason it's more persuasive
00:32:39.660 is that it takes up more space in your brain. In other words, the rhyme makes you repeat it,
00:32:45.420 makes you remember it. It hardens it into a physical structure in your brain.
00:32:50.700 So the next time you get asked, do you think OJ was guilty?
00:32:55.020 There's a structure in your brain that irrationally has been formed by that rhyme
00:33:00.540 because it repeated. And now you think he might be benefit of a doubt. He might be actually innocent
00:33:06.860 because that glove didn't fit and it rhymed and it took up space. So whatever you do to take up space
00:33:13.420 in somebody's head, convince them. Did you know that you can also persuade somebody by making them repeat
00:33:19.740 something? Even if they don't believe it. So if you say, I would like you every day to repeat 10 times,
00:33:29.340 I'm good at playing golf.
00:33:31.260 Probably it would make you convinced you were going to play in golf eventually. Even if your golf game
00:33:37.340 didn't improve, you would come back thinking, you know, the score is still the same, but I've had so 0.90
00:33:43.500 much improvement with my strokes that really, and you would say something ridiculous. And it would only
00:33:49.820 be because the repeating it every day created a structure in your brain that took up a lot of space.
00:33:57.340 Once you understand that humans and large language models
00:34:01.660 are the same, you will unleash a huge amount of ability to understand your environment
00:34:09.500 because you'll understand why people are doing what they do. It's what they've heard the most.
00:34:15.180 Now, you know those people at the top of that whiteboard?
00:34:18.620 Do you know what else they'd like you to do?
00:34:24.540 They'd like your children to stand up and look at the flag and put their hand on their heart
00:34:32.940 and pledge allegiance to the country. Do you know why?
00:34:38.460 Because they're building a structure in the child's head
00:34:41.020 so that their rational thinking will not be able to overcome the embedded pattern that they are going
00:34:49.260 to give their lives for the country. Are they giving their lives to the country? In a way.
00:34:57.420 But they're really giving their lives to their hypnotizers.
00:35:00.140 The people in charge have been overtly, consciously hypnotizing the public since the beginning of the
00:35:09.260 republic with different methods. Where you see repetition, such as standing for the national anthem,
00:35:17.100 that's the hypnosis. And where you see what you call the Marxists and the people trying to destroy the country,
00:35:26.940 where you see them taking down the past and dismantling history,
00:35:31.420 these people were slave owners, stop talking about them, take them off your money, etc. 0.94
00:35:37.420 All of the founders are part of that structure that got put in your head when you were little,
00:35:43.100 that made you loyal to your country. And so as those structures are dismantled,
00:35:49.260 and now when I think of George Washington, do you know what the first thing I think of is?
00:35:54.300 Slave owner. That's the truth. If you said to me, hey, George Washington, what's your first thought? 1.00
00:36:01.420 I would actually think slave owner first. I definitely didn't think that when I was a kid,
00:36:06.860 even though I knew it. I mean, I knew it as a kid, but I didn't think of it first.
00:36:11.100 So that's how the large language model that is your physical brain gets programmed. It's just
00:36:16.620 whatever they put in there the most. And they own the news. So the reason that the people on top
00:36:23.980 have to own the news, it's not optional, is that the only way to control the citizens is by
00:36:30.940 increasing the frequency of certain messages. And that's the world you live in.
00:36:36.540 And that's just one side of the whiteboard. It's getting wilder.
00:36:44.380 All right. If you watch Morning Joe, you saw that Micah, is that her name? Micah Brozinski.
00:36:53.580 Micah Brozinski. She's the wife of that guy, John, Morning John. Anyway,
00:37:02.860 Micah says that when you pronounce Kamala Harris's name wrong, you're a racist.
00:37:09.660 So I don't know. I think she's right. I think Micah Brozinski, I think she's got a point
00:37:20.220 there. That's super racist when you say somebody's name wrong. Anyway, moving on.
00:37:29.020 The Harris versus Trump polls. Apparently, Trump has a 2.5% lead based on 72 polls,
00:37:36.620 according to the Hill. Now, I think the polls are largely garbage at the moment, 0.97
00:37:45.020 because do you know what's about to kick in? 0.99
00:37:49.580 Chug, chug, chug, chug, chug, chug, chug. Let's go back to the whiteboard. The people who picked
00:37:55.100 Kamala Harris controlled the media, you saw the media just flip in lockstep to tell you that Kamala 1.00
00:38:05.580 Harris was so awesome. And it's amazing you hadn't noticed till now. There must have been probably
00:38:13.180 some white guy, maybe Joe Biden, who was keeping her genius under a bushel. She might be the most
00:38:20.300 capable person we've seen in, I don't know, generations. And by the way, Trump's way too old.
00:38:26.540 Are you kidding me? Would you even consider putting an old man into that office? What are you talking 1.00
00:38:32.220 about, people? And they will say that stuff until 49% of the country thinks it's true. And they've
00:38:43.820 really seen the truth there. Because Democrats are largely large language models. And all they need
00:38:54.060 is repetition. And they will become whatever they need to become. I think that Trump's confidence in
00:39:04.940 debating Kamala Harris might be for show. You know, confidence is a good thing to show. But I don't
00:39:14.540 think that Trump can beat Kamala Harris in a debate. I guess I'll just say it directly. I don't believe
00:39:23.340 that Trump can beat Kamala Harris in a debate. Because remember, a debate is not about who did the best
00:39:30.380 best by some objective standard. Who won the debate will be what these people say, the media.
00:39:41.100 So if the media says, well, that was a, that was total destruction. That Kamala Harris, I, we,
00:39:48.220 you know, we told you, we told you, she was always a genius. And you just hadn't seen it until now.
00:39:53.820 But now, she tore apart Trump, she made him look like a fool. And if I don't mind saying, 1.00
00:40:00.460 his age was showing. He seemed a little chaotic. He's got a lot of chaos. Seemed racist. And I think he
00:40:10.620 slightly mispronounced her name once. And, you know, if you happen to be the person who allegedly called,
00:40:17.660 you know, Nazis find people. And you said, Kamala, just not exactly the right way. That's obviously
00:40:24.620 racist. And she won that debate. Now, you might say to yourself, Scott, that's not true. Because
00:40:34.620 both sides knew that Biden lost the debate. That was the most special case in the world.
00:40:42.780 When it's so bad that it would just be laughably ridiculous to say that Biden won when he could 0.62
00:40:49.820 barely function. That's not what we're looking at. We're looking at a woman who will reliably remember 1.00
00:40:57.900 the, the pushback on each topic. She will do her homework. And she will know that when he says
00:41:05.820 on this topic, she doesn't even have to address it directly. She can just say the things she was
00:41:10.460 going to say on that topic. She'll say it with emotion that the news will say was amazing.
00:41:16.700 And they will declare her the winner. Now, you might say to me, but Scott,
00:41:22.860 Fox News is going to say Trump won. Of course. Of course they will. And I might even say that myself.
00:41:31.820 But it won't matter. Because everybody on Fox News was going to vote for Trump anyway.
00:41:36.460 So no votes gained. But can you imagine how the entire conversation changes if they say she's not
00:41:46.780 only ready for office now, she just beat an ex-president, one of the best persuaders we've 1.00
00:41:52.700 ever seen in a debate. And that's coming. What's coming is a, a knockout story that she, she completely
00:42:04.460 annihilated the best persuader we've seen in generations. We've never seen anybody with that
00:42:11.100 kind of a performance. Maybe the best performance we've ever seen. Might possibly the best debate
00:42:16.220 of all time, just right there. And they'll have tears in their eyes. And they'll say how they love
00:42:23.500 her. They love her. I love her. I love her. All right. Have you noticed that Kamala Harris looks like 0.98
00:42:36.540 at least two people when she's being her prosecutor self? As her supporters say, she is awesome. And she 0.94
00:42:44.940 seems on target. And by the way, the reason that I originally thought that she would become Trump's
00:42:51.980 biggest competitor back in 2018, I was saying that, is because I'd seen her grilling people 0.94
00:42:58.300 in a congressional setting. And I said to myself, wow, you're pretty good at that. That was some good
00:43:04.380 grilling. And then she had the, you know, the DEI check marks. So I thought, well, if you put the DEI
00:43:11.260 check marks there and she can look that good in public, that's actually a strong package. I can see 1.00
00:43:18.220 why she would go all the way. So that's why I predicted that she would be the, you know, the big
00:43:23.820 competitor. And it turned out to be Biden instead. But you've all seen the videos where she's acting goofy. 1.00
00:43:32.940 And it's almost like a different person, isn't it?
00:43:39.180 It feels like almost a different person. I'm going to tell you an experience I had where I learned how
00:43:44.220 to identify this. Some years ago, I had a girlfriend who is a chef, and she liked to cook for me while I
00:43:54.940 was finishing work before dinner. And before dinner, we'd have a delightful, you know, time hanging out.
00:44:05.340 And then I'd do some work. She'd do some cooking. And then we'd meet for dinner. And she was just an
00:44:13.900 asshole. And I think I was talking to you for, you know, two hours before dinner. And you were just the most 1.00
00:44:22.220 delightful person, friendly. Now everything I say, you're like challenging and throwing it in my face.
00:44:28.220 And so anyway, the long story is, it turned out that she was guzzling my vodka and my, that I used
00:44:35.420 to have, don't have it anymore, used to have in my refrigerator while she was cooking. So by the time
00:44:41.020 I saw her, she was a different personality. Now, that's when I learned, and it took a long time to
00:44:47.980 figure out what it was. It was months before I deduced it. But it turns out that when I look at
00:44:56.140 Kamala Harris, that's what I see. I see two different people, and one of them looks drunk to me.
00:45:04.220 Now, in her case, I don't think she gets drunk angry, or at least what we see is drunk laughing and
00:45:10.380 drunk. I love my school buses. And, oh, there's Venn diagrams. And, you know, the
00:45:17.900 unburdened by Wilders Band. Although that one maybe isn't drunk. I think she just likes saying that.
00:45:25.980 So I think the biggest story is going to be find out that she has a drinking problem. You want 1.00
00:45:31.100 another hint on that? I'll give you another hint. 92% of Kamala Harris's staff left in her first three 1.00
00:45:37.980 years as vice president. I think I saw a Molly Hemingway post on that. And that's the highest I've
00:45:46.140 ever heard. I mean, have you ever heard of anything like that? And here's my hypothesis. Oh, and also,
00:45:55.260 there was an interview by Simone Sanders was on that morning show, Morning John, with Micah Brozinski.
00:46:04.700 And Micah was asking Simone about what she thought about Kamala Harris. Now she worked for Kamala Harris.
00:46:15.740 Not at the moment, but she used to work for her. And so you'd expect that, you know, one of the 0.99
00:46:20.860 most important boosters of Democrats, you know, somebody who's worked on their campaigns, I think,
00:46:27.180 with Bernie Sanders at one point. And Simone, instead of saying anything about Kamala Harris,
00:46:33.100 she instead talked about how great Biden was and how, you know, selfless it was for him to step down.
00:46:41.740 Now, it seemed a little obvious to observers that she was avoiding the question. She used to work for
00:46:49.420 her. She's a Democrat. She wants a Democrat to win. Here's what I think. I think that
00:46:57.980 the staff got along with Kamala, except when she was drunk. That's what I think. I think that she may
00:47:04.700 actually be known to the staff as an angry drunk. And I'm just speculating, but the the hints are all
00:47:12.620 there. The strong hints. So if I were on the team who wanted to beat her in the election, I would be
00:47:19.900 looking for her ex-staffers. And I'll bet you you could find at least one of them who would dump it 0.99
00:47:25.740 all. Because if Simone Sanders wasn't even willing to put in a kind word in the place where you were 0.99
00:47:32.300 really, really expected to put in a kind word, I don't think she's alone. I don't think she's alone.
00:47:40.300 And if you find out what that's all about, that might be quite important.
00:47:47.100 All right. Well, here's the here are all the arguments that the Democrats are making about
00:47:52.060 Trump at the moment. Searchlight Pictures presents The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.
00:47:58.060 From the director of Meet the Parents and the writer of Poor Things comes The Roses, starring Academy
00:48:03.740 Award winner Olivia Colman, Academy Award nominee Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon,
00:48:09.600 and Alice and Janney. A hilarious new comedy filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of
00:48:15.040 hatred, proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses. See The Roses, only in theaters August 29th.
00:48:21.520 Get tickets now. At Grey Goose, we believe that pleasure is a necessity. That's why we craft the
00:48:28.560 world's number one premium vodka in France, using only three of the finest natural ingredients,
00:48:33.760 French winter wheat, water from Jeansac, and yeast.
00:48:39.200 With Grey Goose, we invite you to live in the moment and make time wait. Sip responsibly.
00:48:44.960 Let's see if you can find what they have in common. See if you see any pattern here.
00:48:59.360 So they say Trump's going to steal your democracy. He's going to implement Project 2025 that's got all
00:49:05.120 kinds of extreme, extreme things in it. He's only in it for himself. He's a cult. He's a sex offender,
00:49:13.280 and he's a felon. Now, how in the world can Democrats sell those things? Do you see what's 0.98
00:49:21.600 missing? Does anybody see what's missing? He's not experienced. That's not up there,
00:49:29.120 because he's clearly very experienced. He has an unsuccessful track record.
00:49:38.080 You'd think that would be up there, if that's their claim.
00:49:41.600 Okay. His policies for the future are bad. Where's that?
00:49:52.000 Is there? Oh, yeah, the age. The age, that's the funny one. Now, do you know what to steal their
00:49:57.840 democracy means when they have to give examples? Here are some examples. There are a few more that
00:50:03.520 were as dumb as these. He wants you to be able to own a gun. That's stealing your democracy. 1.00
00:50:10.960 Do you understand why? Because if you're allowed to own a gun, then you might use that gun to go
00:50:17.760 take somebody's democracy away, their freedom, because you would rob them or shoot them or something.
00:50:24.800 So, allowing people to do what the Constitution says they should do, have a gun, is one of their
00:50:31.440 examples of stealing democracy. Do you think the other ones are better than that? They're not.
00:50:40.080 They're as dumb as that. I think one of them is women's reproductive rights. 1.00
00:50:47.360 Trump has already said he doesn't want to do any federal thing about that at all.
00:50:51.200 He literally wants to be uninvolved in it. So, he's going to steal your democracy by being as
00:50:57.680 consciously and actively uninvolved as he could possibly be and being opposed to the things that
00:51:04.720 you're worried about. So, that's what they're complaining about. They don't have anything that
00:51:11.680 he says he will do that they're worried about. Remember the first time he ran? They complained about the
00:51:20.320 things he said he would do, like close the border and stuff. And then he did it, and it turned out
00:51:27.040 that was better than not doing it. So, they have to make up these weird little tortured things.
00:51:34.720 Oh, the other one was discouraging people from voting. That's how he's stealing your democracy.
00:51:42.000 Have you yet met that person who got discouraged from voting?
00:51:46.080 Has anybody met one? Has the news ever done an interview with somebody who was discouraged from
00:51:51.280 voting because they couldn't get an ID? There's still not one example in a country of
00:51:58.560 350 million people. Well, voters would be, what, 150? But they can't find one example
00:52:06.400 in one of the main pillars of stealing your democracy. All right. Project 2025. He's got his
00:52:16.480 own thing that's like agenda 47, I think. He says, this is what I'm going to do, and it's not in that
00:52:24.080 document, and they're still using it. Who in the world runs complaining about the thing that somebody
00:52:32.640 says they're not willing to do? I've never seen that before. How about he's in it for himself?
00:52:41.680 I think they might be saying that less after watching Biden hanging on, but did you notice
00:52:47.680 what they all said, all the Democrats said immediately when Biden resigned?
00:52:53.040 They immediately said, instead of saying he was so selfish that he hung on too long,
00:52:58.800 which is what we all observed. What we all observed is that he was too selfish and he hung on too long.
00:53:06.160 That's what it looked like. But as soon as they forced him, probably, into resigning,
00:53:13.120 they turned it into, oh, he is so selfless. He's like George Washington giving up power,
00:53:20.400 because their attack on Trump was that he's in it for himself. And they had to change the story
00:53:26.800 about Biden who looked like he must have been in it for his family or himself or something.
00:53:32.320 And they had to immediately make sure everybody said the same thing. Oh, what a patriot. Only
00:53:40.400 somebody like a great founder could do something like that. Then the other one that's funny is that
00:53:49.120 Trump supporters are a cult. Now, do you know how they get away with that?
00:53:55.040 They just make words mean different things and definitions mean different things than they mean.
00:54:00.320 So what they mean is he's really popular and people like him a lot.
00:54:05.360 Now, let me test you, since I think almost all of you are Trump supporters watching this right now.
00:54:12.720 If Trump told you to murder your Democrat neighbor so that he could take full control,
00:54:18.640 how quickly would you do it? Would you be all over that? You'd be grabbing a weapon,
00:54:26.240 slaying the neighbor because your cult leader told you to? What does it mean to be a cult leader?
00:54:32.240 What does it mean to be a cult? People can't simply agree that they like a leader,
00:54:38.560 they like a set of policies and they're willing to fight for it and that they turn it into a cult.
00:54:46.480 To me, it's just another way to insult Trump supporters. Yeah. And to imagine that one is a cult
00:54:54.080 is a little crazy, a little crazy. Then there's the, you know, all the sex offenses.
00:55:01.840 Now that one's pretty sticky because every, every female, um, who's ever had any passing 1.00
00:55:10.240 association with sexual offenses is just going to be triggered by that. And there's probably no way
00:55:15.840 to change that. So you got a solid, I don't know, a huge percentage of the female population 1.00
00:55:22.800 who is just way too triggered about that. But if I were Trump or let's say a Trump supporter,
00:55:28.320 um, people ask me, how can you support somebody who's been convicted? They say, but that's not
00:55:37.200 the right word. Uh, just 10 out of 12 jurors in the most biased place in the world decided to punish
00:55:43.600 him because they didn't like him probably. Uh, so certainly the justice system didn't operate
00:55:50.320 where that was a finding. Um, and certainly that was political. So if you know, it's lawfare
00:56:02.240 and you know, it's political, you're two thirds of the way to understanding why it doesn't bother me.
00:56:09.280 But here's the final one third of why it doesn't bother me. Number one, Biden is as credibly accused
00:56:18.160 of things that are as bad. Now that doesn't make him true. It just means he's as credibly accused
00:56:26.880 of things that sound as bad. Now here's the final one third, which most of you would not be aware of.
00:56:34.160 Uh, and it's because most people who haven't been as canceled as me can't tell you.
00:56:38.480 Public figures, if they're male, have all been falsely accused of sex offenses. How many of you
00:56:47.760 knew that? That important male figures, like the famous ones, uh, the rich and famous ones,
00:56:54.160 they've all been accused of sexual offenses falsely. Now, some of them may have done actual
00:57:00.800 sexual offenses and I'm not defending that obviously. Uh, I'm saying that it's the most
00:57:06.080 common thing in the world. How do I know that? Because I've been accused falsely of sexual offenses.
00:57:12.880 I think everybody in my position has, uh, I've told you about the, the, the one that comes out
00:57:18.720 every few years. So there's somebody in Canada who's gets off remeds, I think, and calls my business
00:57:25.840 partners, you know, like publishers and syndicated syndication companies. When I had those, uh,
00:57:31.840 my restaurant, when I, when I owned restaurants, they would call my restaurant and tell a story
00:57:36.560 about me traveling up to Canada, uh, rifling through her computers, breaking into her house
00:57:42.800 and, uh, sexually molesting her. Now, if you just had some person call you and tell you that story,
00:57:51.040 you'd think, well, I think you did. And maybe my business partners did, but at least they called
00:57:57.200 me and told me it happened. And I said, oh, you know, she gets off her meds every three years and 0.97
00:58:02.080 says that I've never been to even the part of Canada she lives in. Now, have I ever heard of
00:58:11.040 anybody else being falsely accused? Yes. I can think of two, three, four, four cases off the top
00:58:21.120 of my head in which I know from the woman's side that she falsely accused somebody. Do you?
00:58:29.840 How many of you know somebody, a woman who has admitted to you in their own words, not your opinion,
00:58:35.600 their own words that they have falsely accused somebody of a sexual crime? It's shockingly high.
00:58:43.760 Now, is it as high as the number of actual crimes? I don't know. I don't know. But we live in a world
00:58:52.160 where false accusations are so common, but the regular public is not aware of it. The reason the
00:59:00.000 regular public is not aware of it is that if you're a public figure, the last thing you want to do is say
00:59:04.960 it in public like I just did. Right? So another benefit of being canceled. I can say anything I
00:59:11.280 want in public. So I'm going to tell you what not everybody knows. It's really, really common.
00:59:19.440 The higher you go in office, the more common it is to be falsely accused. You know, all that there's
00:59:26.240 some fund for settling these sexual accusations against members of Congress. And a lot of people
00:59:32.800 are saying we need to see that list and, you know, who's doing all the settling. Now, probably
00:59:40.240 there are some serious and real charges on that list, but I can tell you with certainty that some
00:59:46.880 of them are not real and probably just got settled because it was easier. So if you don't know the
00:59:52.960 percentage of real versus fake and then this one that comes out of nowhere with a bunch of suspicious
01:00:02.320 elements to it in the justice system itself, I think they had to change the statute of limitations
01:00:08.160 to make it stick and really sketchy stuff. Then I find that it's no more believable than
01:00:17.600 any other accusation against a famous man. And I say, just because a jury was convinced in New York,
01:00:27.360 that is not persuasive. A criminal trial, I think I might have been persuaded.
01:00:33.280 But it wasn't a criminal trial. It was just, do you think it's more likely it happened?
01:00:37.360 And then people use their bias. Because the question of, is it more likely yes than more
01:00:42.880 likely no? That really brings in your bias. It's like, well, look at all the other things I think
01:00:49.120 Trump has done. Why wouldn't he? Sounds just like him. Right? So no, he didn't have any chance of
01:00:54.640 getting a fair trial. So if he did those things, then he should be judged for them. But I don't think
01:01:02.000 I have any way of knowing. And so my decision process is that for both Biden, who is also
01:01:09.280 about equally credibly accused, I say, I don't know. I know that when I hear the accusations,
01:01:16.480 they sound credible. But I also know that false accusations would sound credible. So I give Biden a
01:01:24.960 benefit of a doubt. You've probably heard me not give him a hard time about, you know, similar
01:01:30.640 accusations. So it's never anything I emphasize. Because I just have a different view of how often
01:01:37.280 the fake accusations come. All right.
01:01:44.640 So, and then of course, they're going to say Trump's a felon. But the argument against that
01:01:49.120 is that they made him a felon. So the reason that he should be elected is to get rid of people who will
01:01:55.840 use lawfare to turn a person into a felon. That's how I would argue it. I'd say I'm absolutely a felon
01:02:03.680 because of you. And one of the reasons I'm running is to get rid of an administration that would lawfare
01:02:09.440 somebody like me to keep them out of office. The fact that I'm a felon is the indictment of the entire
01:02:16.880 broken machine. Here's how the machine works. First, they change, you know, then you just go through how
01:02:23.680 how the system is broken. Joy Reid called the selection of Kamala, which looks like a done deal,
01:02:32.560 as a Pelosi coup. So she's actually using that word.
01:02:37.840 Anyway, I think what happened was that Biden was threatened by the 25th Amendment. And the one
01:02:50.960 thing he had to agree to was to select or to endorse somebody who would keep the racial divide going.
01:02:58.400 Because I've got a feeling that the people at the top don't want you, well, the other side of the
01:03:02.480 board, the people at the top don't want you knowing that it's the rich and powerful that
01:03:07.440 are your problem. They want you to think it's each other. If you're watching this and you're thinking,
01:03:15.360 what's wrong with these white people? Or what's wrong with these other other people? 0.82
01:03:19.520 Maybe you should ask yourself who wants you to think that way.
01:03:23.440 If you realize that you're a large language model brain, ask yourself what content has been put in
01:03:30.160 to your patterns the most? And who did it? Was it the media that made you think about
01:03:37.360 race all the time? Why would they do such a thing? And so you're not thinking about something else all 1.00
01:03:43.440 the time, something that would be maybe more directly applicable.
01:03:49.120 Well, Eric Holder, I guess he's in charge of vetting Kamala Harris's picks.
01:03:57.040 And his law firm also does a lot of work in DEI audits to make sure big companies comply with DEI.
01:04:06.560 Let's see. Eric Holder is doing a selection for Kamala Harris. And his law firm is deeply into
01:04:16.240 making sure that DEI is functioning in every big organization. Who is he going to pick?
01:04:23.520 I think all the white people that were named as potential presidential candidates are probably
01:04:34.320 also thinking they're not going to be vice presidential candidates. But it might depend
01:04:39.360 entirely upon how it polls. So it might come down to whatever polls the best wins. So she might have
01:04:47.840 the option of a white guy in this case. We'll see. All right.
01:04:58.240 Let's talk about Cheadle. Director Cheadle of the Secret Service was grilled by Congress.
01:05:05.040 I noticed that representatives Luna and Mace
01:05:08.720 Worthy seemed to take the lead in attacking her, which was smart, because Cheadle is getting this
01:05:19.120 DEI accusations, you know, that she's a DEI hire. And I wouldn't say that there's direct evidence of that,
01:05:26.160 but it always has to be your top three suspicion in this case. And so having the
01:05:33.760 two of the strongest members of Congress who also happened to be female go hard at her was 1.00
01:05:41.440 probably your best play. I haven't seen anybody notice that they took the lead.
01:05:48.160 If they didn't take the lead, they were at least the most explosive, the most strategic,
01:05:58.320 and the most damning. So they did a great job. Anyway, I keep noticing that people who are not
01:06:09.840 answering questions are acting like they're under duress. And I swear, Cheadle acts like she's under
01:06:15.360 duress. She does such a poor job of defending herself that it looks like she's signaling that 0.98
01:06:22.400 she's being told what to do. Now, can I prove that? No. Would I bet my life on it? No.
01:06:29.920 It's just what it looks like to me. It doesn't look like a genuine person acting in a genuine way.
01:06:36.560 It looks like there's some force pushing her outside of her and that she's almost subconsciously
01:06:43.120 signaling it. I guess it's the hypnotist in me. The hypnotist in me says that if she's being forced,
01:06:50.560 she would choose different language than if she were doing it voluntarily. So if you weren't paying
01:06:56.640 attention to the exact language choice, you'd say, well, you know, she's just saying answers to
01:07:02.720 questions. But if you look at the language, it's so poor and you know that she couldn't possibly be 0.92
01:07:08.720 that poor at communicating that it just signals that her subconscious is sending you a separate
01:07:14.800 message. So that's the hypnotist frame on it. Anyway, some bipartisan task force is going to
01:07:23.760 look into it. I don't know if I trust any of that. And the biggest story that nobody wants to talk
01:07:30.000 about is that the debt crisis is coming and there's no way to pay off the debt crisis. Does anybody know,
01:07:37.360 should we do what Kim.com says and buy gold? I don't know if that's really a good idea,
01:07:43.680 but I don't know if it's a bad idea. Should you get Bitcoin if you think the dollar is going to be
01:07:49.200 worthless or does Bitcoin become less valuable to somehow? What about real estate? Is the reason
01:07:58.320 that people like BlackRock are buying all those homes is that they think real estate will survive
01:08:04.160 the crash better? You know, because at least it's physical, you know, paper money can disappear,
01:08:09.840 but land is still land. So someday it might be worth something again. I don't know. But I would like
01:08:17.920 to see why our candidates are not being asked about this. Now, this is a case where I believe that
01:08:26.720 there would be an enormous advantage for Trump if asked the question what to do about the national debt.
01:08:33.680 Have you noticed? And I'll bet you in the next debate, nobody asked the question.
01:08:38.400 Now, the national debt is our number one problem. You all know that, right? If you made a list of all
01:08:44.720 the problems in the country, it would be all the other problems in the country put together
01:08:50.560 would be a distant second to the national debt. Do you all know that? We only have one problem.
01:08:57.280 A friend of mine used to say that if you can solve it with money, it's not a problem.
01:09:07.360 It's not a problem. If you can solve it with money, it's not a problem. The one thing we can't solve
01:09:13.840 with money is the national debt. So it's our only problem.
01:09:20.080 Everything else altogether are things we wish were better, but they're not going to kill us.
01:09:27.280 Climate change isn't going to kill us. We're probably not going to run out of food.
01:09:31.760 I don't think we're going to get in a nuclear war. I think Ukraine will figure out a way to wind down.
01:09:38.160 I think the Middle East will always be bubbling, but maybe not much worse than it is. 1.00
01:09:44.400 I think the economy will survive. I think robots will figure out a way to make them work.
01:09:50.880 But the debt is unsolvable.
01:09:55.520 As far as I know, nobody's ever even suggested a solution.
01:10:01.360 So imagine if in the debate, the liars in the media, who obviously are trying to cover up this
01:10:08.560 problem, because they have to know it's the only real problem, they should ask the question,
01:10:14.960 what would you do about $175 trillion debt? Now, if they were being honest, they'd say,
01:10:22.480 with the question, and nobody believes that you could grow the economy enough to make a difference,
01:10:30.000 what would you do? Because you want to take away Trump's first take on it. Because Trump just says,
01:10:36.320 I'm going to grow the economy. And by the way, I'll cut your taxes, and that will make more taxes
01:10:41.280 available. Do you know how little that would make a difference? Like if he doubled the GDP,
01:10:48.800 which isn't going to happen. But what if he did? Not even close. Yeah. No, nothing he says
01:10:55.280 will even be anywhere near an answer. But whatever Trump says on that topic
01:11:03.840 is going to be 100% better and more believable than whatever Kamala Harris says, because she doesn't 1.00
01:11:12.320 understand the topic. She won't be able to talk about debt. I don't think she understands it. And I'm
01:11:20.880 not sure anybody does, honestly, because the national debt is not like personal debt. That's
01:11:25.280 a whole different deal. But I think at least Trump knows where all the levers are.
01:11:33.200 If you at least know where the levers are, you can make a case that, okay, in the long run,
01:11:39.600 we're going to have to get our robots to lower our costs. Oh, here's what. Here's what Trump could say.
01:11:46.080 And the only way we can survive this is greatly lowering our costs, not just in the government,
01:11:54.400 but in your personal lives. Because probably the money will have to deflate.
01:12:00.640 So however much money you have now, the only way the debt goes away is your money is going to be
01:12:06.480 worth less. Your dollar is going to be worth 50 cents someday, maybe 10 cents. The challenge will be
01:12:12.880 to make sure that 10 cents or whatever you're left with can give you a high quality life.
01:12:18.960 And in the world of robots and AI, if you also have lots of energy, you would need, oh, by the way,
01:12:25.680 here's one of the biggest things in the world that just happened. China just successfully tested a
01:12:31.440 shutdown of a Gen 4 nuclear power plant. Now, if that doesn't mean, if you don't immediately get what a big
01:12:40.400 deal that is, you can't shut down a regular power plant without a meltdown. It'll say you turn off
01:12:48.240 the energy, it would melt down. And that's the big risk. But the so-called fourth generation,
01:12:56.400 and this is the first production one I've seen put into play in China, they did a controlled shutdown
01:13:03.440 where they just turned it off. And all it did was turn off. It worked. Now, this is a design that has
01:13:12.800 been talked about for years, but it just takes a long time for the engineering to catch up with the
01:13:17.280 science so they can actually build the thing. But then now they built it. They've proven that you can
01:13:22.560 build a fourth generation nuclear reactor. You don't have to wait for a fusion. So the solution
01:13:28.960 would be, if I were Trump, I'd say, here's the deal. We're going to need a bunch of fourth generation, 1.00
01:13:34.640 maybe some third generation power plants. We're going to make sure that we have some designs that
01:13:41.280 are approved by the federal government. We're going to make sure the federal government removes any
01:13:46.240 roadblocks. We're going to make sure that the waste is stored on site, so there's no extra
01:13:52.320 risks to the community. And we're going to build them like crazy because whoever has the cheapest
01:13:58.960 energy in the future wins. So we're going to make an energy race to lower our expenses so that our
01:14:06.720 cost of energy will be dropping, dropping, but we'll also have the best AI because you need the best
01:14:11.920 energy to get AI. We'll have the best electric cars, and we'll be able to, with completely voluntary
01:14:20.240 process, get more electric vehicles, but without telling you, you can't have a gas car. Eventually,
01:14:28.000 you're still going to want the electric vehicle because the cost of electricity with these new
01:14:32.640 energy plants will go down to almost nothing to power your electric car. But your gas is still going
01:14:39.760 to cost something because there's no way you can make getting gas out of the ground cheap, although
01:14:44.320 maybe the robots can. So these things are harder to predict than you think. All right. Anyway,
01:14:54.080 there was a study on UBI giving people $1,000 a month that just made them lazy and stupid. 1.00
01:15:01.040 That's all you need to know. Giving people money made them worse off, not better off. They weren't 1.00
01:15:05.200 even happier. My next idea is that if the Republicans want to be anti-abortion, they would be far more
01:15:14.960 credible if they also worked on something for adoption. And here's what I would suggest. I don't
01:15:24.240 think this is going to work for Republicans because they're so pro-family. And it would go like this.
01:15:29.680 There should be a second track for single women who get pregnant and don't want to be a mom. 1.00
01:15:37.280 In other words, there should be something that everybody knows about that you could say, oh, wow.
01:15:42.720 You know what? I'll give birth to the baby because the country needs babies, according to Elon Musk.
01:15:47.360 And he's right. We need more babies. And somebody is willing to put me up in a nice place.
01:15:54.240 I won't have to work for nine months and somebody will actually pay for my baby. In other words, I will
01:16:01.040 I'll come out ahead. Perhaps I will study a skill while I'm pregnant so I don't have to go to work
01:16:06.880 every day. Maybe I can just learn a skill so that when I'm done, I got paid for having a baby. I lived in
01:16:14.160 a nice place. I gave birth to life. I didn't have to go through an abortion. I learned a new skill.
01:16:21.840 And now I'm back better than ever. So to me, if Trump could come up with an alternate path,
01:16:31.200 that is not there's no pressure, no pressure has to be a free market. And you say, we want we want
01:16:38.720 abortion to go to zero. And here's how serious we are. And we want you to know that we think it's
01:16:45.120 murder. It has nothing to do with your freedom. Whenever murder is involved, freedom is, of course,
01:16:52.480 always in play. But we'd like to be as positive as possible, because I think Trump could sell that.
01:16:57.920 I think he could sell. We're trying to be the most kind, freedom giving. We'd like women who have a
01:17:07.200 baby, but no husband or the husband left or whatever. We want to make sure that they get 0.70
01:17:12.080 the maximum best life. If you're bringing a human into the world, you're not garbage like maybe other
01:17:20.000 people would say you are. You're a star. You're a star if you can bring a person into the world in 0.93
01:17:26.480 America. So we want to really help you do that. We want to celebrate you. And while our first choice
01:17:33.520 is that you be part of a family. First choice is that you're married. First choice is, you know,
01:17:39.440 you do the traditional family. But we realize that things happen. And once things happen,
01:17:45.200 we'd love to give you a better option than terminating the pregnancy.
01:17:49.680 I think that would just be a great argument to have in the public sphere.
01:17:59.040 Anyway, did you know that there's another study that says that loneliness makes you age faster and
01:18:08.480 die? Did you know there's another study that says being outside in nature, just 10 minutes makes you
01:18:14.800 healthier? How many times have I told you there's a new study on those two things? Going outdoors makes
01:18:20.560 you healthier immediately, especially bare feet, especially in the sun in the morning. You know,
01:18:25.840 that's the Hooverman thing. And loneliness especially you want to defeat. Now, I'm going to solve both of
01:18:31.840 those for you. Are you ready? You're President Trump. You say we have a loneliness epidemic in this
01:18:37.680 country. Here's what I suggest. Every night, eat dinner. And as soon as you're done with dinner,
01:18:44.720 walk outdoors and with the rest of your neighbors, take a walk. Because your blood sugar will go
01:18:50.800 immediately down if you take a walk. Going outdoors will make you immediately healthy. And walking with
01:18:56.480 your friends will give you some less loneliness. So organize with your neighbors that you'll pick a
01:19:02.880 time. Let's say it's 6 p.m. And at 6 p.m., you'll all meet after dinner and you'll just take a walk.
01:19:10.000 You don't have to walk the whole way. You can go halfway and come home. But you're going to meet
01:19:14.000 up with your neighbors. You're going to introduce yourself. You're going to have something to do.
01:19:18.000 The trick with loneliness is you have to have an organized activity with a common goal, which is a walk.
01:19:26.320 And it has to be people that you're going to see more than once.
01:19:29.680 You do not get invested in people you're not going to see again. So it's got to be repeated
01:19:34.320 exposure to the same pool of people for a common thing. That's how you cure loneliness.
01:19:40.240 If Trump said, I'm going to cure your loneliness, here's what you need to do. That would be amazing.
01:19:50.000 Organized walks after dinner. And there's some kind of metal that seems to be creating oxygen under the
01:19:56.560 ocean, which means that maybe oxygen didn't come entirely from photosynthesis, which means that
01:20:02.560 maybe there's oxygen in other places in the universe, which means maybe you can add some oxygen to Mars
01:20:09.200 without plants, if you knew what the chemical reaction was. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is
01:20:15.840 my show for today. I think you'll agree it's one of the finest shows you've ever seen.
01:20:25.600 Would you agree? Yeah, it was one of the best things you'll ever see.
01:20:29.520 And I'm going to go talk to the locals people in a minute. How'd I do?
01:20:40.160 We've got a secret. We're not going to tell you. All right. Thanks, everybody on YouTube and Rumble and X.
01:20:49.120 I'm going to say bye to you. We'll see you tomorrow. Same time, same place.
01:20:52.080 And I'm going to go talk to my local subscribers privately. Have a great day.