Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2549 CWSA 07⧸28⧸24

00:00:00.000 In your whole life, and your tiny, shiny human brain can't even understand what's next.

00:00:06.180 Yeah, it's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:08.260 And for that, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein,

00:00:11.840 a kenteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind, to fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:15.820 I like coffee.

00:00:17.560 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine.

00:00:21.180 At the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:23.060 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:25.240 Go.

00:00:30.000 Oh, that's some good, good stuff right there.

00:00:36.040 Get those Keurig pods.

00:00:38.360 They work every time.

00:00:41.180 Well, there's new inventions.

00:00:43.560 SciTech Daily is reporting that researchers at the University of Minnesota have some kind of technology

00:00:50.640 that could reduce the electricity you need for AI by a factor of a thousand.

00:00:57.660 Now, I don't like to get all technical, but what they did was they figured out how to keep the data in the memory.

00:01:09.760 Yep.

00:01:11.020 A new model where the data never leaves the memory.

00:01:14.200 So I guess if you keep your data in your memory and manipulate it there instead of sending it somewhere else,

00:01:19.920 it saves a lot of energy.

00:01:21.460 I don't really understand most of that.

00:01:22.900 But if it's true, and they seem to have demonstrated it, a thousand times, a factor of a thousand times better on energy.

00:01:34.140 Now, this is one of the biggest newses in the world.

00:01:41.020 Think about it.

00:01:42.960 One of our biggest problems is that we don't have enough energy for AI.

00:01:46.740 And if you don't have good AI, I don't know, China owns everything eventually. 0.88

00:01:52.580 So this one kind of invention might change really everything about the future, if it's real.

00:02:00.360 We'll see.

00:02:01.820 Do you remember when Forbes was a respectable publication?

00:02:06.940 Did you know that that's changed, right?

00:02:09.320 I think they changed hands.

00:02:11.360 I think maybe Forbes sold it.

00:02:13.480 But now it's just turned into some weird liberal opinion rag.

00:02:18.720 And somebody named Tilak Doshi wrote an article in which she was defending J.D. Vance from accusations of climate denialism

00:02:30.640 simply by publishing numbers about what science got right and got wrong and what is the state of climate change.

00:02:40.540 And not only was the article removed, but the writer was removed as a contributor.

00:02:49.320 And it said that opinions, there was too much opinion in it about climate change.

00:02:56.760 Now, do you think Forbes has recently run any other articles about climate change?

00:03:02.920 Yeah, of course they have.

00:03:04.440 Do you think any of those articles included some opinion?

00:03:08.520 Of course they did.

00:03:10.640 Of course they did.

00:03:12.480 But apparently if your opinion is the other direction, even if you back it up with data and official sources,

00:03:19.360 you will be kicked out because you've got the wrong opinion.

00:03:22.500 And they don't want that kind of opinion there.

00:03:24.540 And part of it, I think, demonstrates that on the left, they really can't tell the difference between the facts and the opinions.

00:03:33.900 I'm noticing that more and more.

00:03:36.320 I think it might have something to do with the way their news is presented,

00:03:39.800 is that the opinion people and the news people are literally the same people.

00:03:44.420 Where if you're on the right, you understand that Brett Baer is telling you news.

00:03:49.020 And Hannity is opinion. 0.77

00:03:53.900 And, you know, some of the shows on Fox News will mix the opinion and the news.

00:03:59.580 But it's very transparent.

00:04:01.780 You know what's an opinion and you know what the news is.

00:04:04.800 I really think that on the left, the Democrats are having trouble telling what the difference is between the news and an opinion

00:04:12.540 because it's presented as all one thing to them.

00:04:16.260 It's very different.

00:04:18.800 So I can see how they'd be so confused.

00:04:23.060 Here's the funniest suggestion that I've seen recently.

00:04:27.340 So this is from, apparently in Australia, there's a new law that says all of their public companies have to include in their annual reports

00:04:38.280 some kind of climate risk assessment.

00:04:42.500 So the idea is that you would do your normal financial reporting.

00:04:46.640 But in Australia, you would have to say, and, you know, a risk from climate change is this or that.

00:04:52.980 And so I saw a, it was an essay by Eric Warhol in the What's Up With That website.

00:05:04.480 And apparently he's got this idea that every Australian company should say that climate change will end their company.

00:05:15.640 So instead of just sort of tiptoeing around it and saying, well, here's all our financials, but, you know, you should also know

00:05:24.880 you've got a little bit of risk of climate change.

00:05:28.300 But that's not really what the science says.

00:05:32.100 The science says we're all doomed, doesn't it?

00:05:37.120 I think it does.

00:05:38.280 And since we have no solutions, nobody has proposed any workable solution that would affect India and China.

00:05:47.360 So the suggestion is that every Australian company should say that climate change will destroy them completely in time.

00:05:59.260 Now, that's kind of brilliant because it's what I call giving people what they want.

00:06:06.680 You know, there's a way to satisfy the bureaucracy by destroying it at the same time.

00:06:14.840 If you maliciously comply with the rules the way they're written, you would actually say, in the long run, our company will burn up and everybody will die from climate change.

00:06:27.620 And that would be actually compatible with science.

00:06:30.700 Now, here's why, hold on.

00:06:40.460 There is somebody that sends me a message during my show every fucking day, and I'm going to send them a message and say, 0.68

00:06:48.780 never send me, never message this time of day.

00:06:59.160 I am doing live stream.

00:07:07.780 All right.

00:07:08.680 That should make a difference.

00:07:10.940 Solve that for the rest of time.

00:07:12.760 Anyway, this is a brilliant idea.

00:07:16.660 Just everybody should say climate change is going to kill them, and it would make all the reporting a lot easier.

00:07:22.540 All right.

00:07:23.200 So I accidentally hit on a great reframe that was way better than I thought.

00:07:31.160 You know that for years I've been taking the fake news from the left and calling them hoaxes.

00:07:38.200 And I would say, I'm going to debunk your hoax.

00:07:43.560 So, you know, I'd be like debunking and debunking.

00:07:47.420 And it really wasn't making much of a dent.

00:07:51.920 So instead, I decided to call it a brainwashing test.

00:07:58.020 And so I posted this.

00:08:00.780 I said, I'm a hypnotist, so I can test you for brainwashing, in case you wondered if you're brainwashed.

00:08:06.580 Did you fall for any of these hoaxes?

00:08:08.880 Now, I know what you want to do.

00:08:10.460 You want to increase the list of my hoaxes.

00:08:13.000 Don't do that.

00:08:13.960 That's a mistake.

00:08:16.160 You're the three that can tell you if you're brainwashed.

00:08:19.660 Did you believe the fine people hoax?

00:08:22.000 Did you believe the drinking, injecting, bleach hoax?

00:08:24.720 And did you believe the January 6th was an insurrection hoax?

00:08:31.000 And I, of course, published those as the test to find out if you're brainwashed.

00:08:38.260 Now, it turns out, of course, most of my audience said, no, I got all those right.

00:08:42.900 I'm not brainwashed.

00:08:44.300 And they are correct.

00:08:45.360 If you got all three of those right, you're definitely not brainwashed by Democrat news.

00:08:50.700 But the funny part is a number of people who came into the comments saying, well, but those

00:08:57.440 are true.

00:08:58.380 Saw it with my own eyes.

00:09:00.040 Heard it with my own ears.

00:09:01.900 And I used to try to show them the debunk.

00:09:04.620 It's like, no, here's what you missed.

00:09:06.320 The news cut off the edit here, blah, blah, blah.

00:09:09.060 But now it seems much more powerful to just say, oh, I'm sorry that they did this to you.

00:09:16.600 You need to treat the brainwashed not like they have different opinions because that's

00:09:22.680 not what's going on.

00:09:24.060 You need to treat them with some empathy and say, can you pass this simple test?

00:09:30.100 Just three questions.

00:09:31.200 Now, resist, resist, resist the need to add to that.

00:09:37.980 Because as soon as you add, you're going to add one that people go, well, you know, maybe

00:09:42.800 that one's true.

00:09:44.360 Don't add.

00:09:46.200 It's the fewest there are, the better it is.

00:09:49.320 Because those are the ones that are really the ten pole primary hoaxes. 1.00

00:09:54.660 If you can debunk those, then all the rest seem more obvious to people.

00:09:58.620 Don't add to the list.

00:10:00.000 That's very, very important to the persuasion.

00:10:03.080 Three is the maximum for this.

00:10:05.860 But try it with your friends.

00:10:08.140 And don't say, oh, let me explain why these are hoaxes.

00:10:12.200 Just tell them they failed the brainwashing test.

00:10:15.200 That's it.

00:10:16.200 And let them deal with that.

00:10:17.420 And never leave that frame.

00:10:19.340 Just say, I'm really sorry they did that to you.

00:10:21.880 It's kind of messed up.

00:10:24.080 So empathy is the right response, not argument.

00:10:28.080 Argument just gets pushback.

00:10:30.060 Empathy makes them think, wait a minute, why are they treating me like I'm some kind

00:10:36.100 of patient?

00:10:37.080 Because you are.

00:10:37.820 You're a victim.

00:10:38.760 If you've been brainwashed, you are literally a victim.

00:10:42.560 And that's the way to treat them.

00:10:43.520 It's very persuasive as well.

00:10:47.440 Well, have you noticed that every time you see a little trend that has something to do

00:10:55.220 with men and women and dating and marriage, it always seems to be in the same direction,

00:11:00.800 which is it's some little news item that makes it less likely you're going to have a baby.

00:11:08.080 Is it my imagination?

00:11:10.480 It all seems to be moving in one direction.

00:11:13.160 Well, here's another one.

00:11:14.940 Now, you're going to confuse this story with my opinion.

00:11:18.240 All right.

00:11:20.020 So my opinion on this is not relevant.

00:11:24.220 And so I'll do it without my opinion.

00:11:26.100 So the story is that apparently there's some, I don't know if this will be a big trend or

00:11:34.420 not, but it's being reported in the New York Post, that the high fashion women are going 1.00

00:11:41.080 toward a natural look below the belt, meaning a non-shaven look in their nether regions.

00:11:48.440 Going back to sort of a seventies, let's call it the full Bush look.

00:11:53.800 That's what New York Post called it.

00:11:55.540 Now, it doesn't matter what my opinion about this is.

00:12:00.240 So let's divorce my opinion and your opinion.

00:12:03.860 This doesn't matter what your opinion is either.

00:12:06.840 I make the following observation.

00:12:10.380 For a lot of men, this is a one-way trip.

00:12:13.900 Not for everybody, but for a lot of men.

00:12:18.980 So a lot of men are going to say, I really kind of got used to that fully shaved thing.

00:12:25.620 You can't really go back.

00:12:29.060 If you had liked the full Bush look, you probably could get used to the shaved look.

00:12:36.900 But once you get used to the shaved look, it's not going to be an easy trip back.

00:12:45.880 So all I'm saying is that this would introduce a new percentage of the population 0.92

00:12:51.300 were men who just say, you know what?

00:12:54.720 Forget it.

00:12:57.120 I don't know what percent.

00:12:59.180 Might be 1%.

00:13:00.360 Might be 10%.

00:13:01.780 Could be 40%.

00:13:03.040 But people have very strong opinions about this topic.

00:13:06.820 Very strong.

00:13:08.220 And I can tell you that this change, well, I don't have an opinion about it as a fashion.

00:13:14.000 And I don't have an opinion about what women should or should not do with their bodies. 1.00

00:13:17.880 I'm out of that conversation.

00:13:19.720 I'm just making the simple observation that it's mostly a one-way trip.

00:13:24.500 And everything seems to be just a little bit extra, had to make each other less attractive

00:13:34.020 to each other.

00:13:35.700 It's just everything feels like it's moving in that direction in a thousand different ways.

00:13:41.560 How about, do you remember when you were younger?

00:13:46.740 And if you were considering who to date, it never occurred to you to look into their politics?

00:13:53.380 Do you remember that?

00:13:55.200 I remember when that wasn't a question.

00:13:58.740 Like, of course, a Democrat and a Republican could get together.

00:14:02.300 Of course.

00:14:03.560 Who would even think they couldn't?

00:14:05.480 And now that's gone.

00:14:07.360 Now, we also have, you know, the, let's call it the fat acceptance movement, along with,

00:14:13.840 of course, our diet is poison.

00:14:17.560 And you can see the results when you look at old pictures of America versus new.

00:14:22.280 People are way bigger.

00:14:24.500 And I don't think that's leading toward knocking a lot of boots.

00:14:28.340 So, in a million little ways, people are finding ways to be less reproductively available.

00:14:36.120 You would not be surprised to know that the rioters in D.C., the ones that were rioting when Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu was speaking,

00:14:48.300 you may have, you may wonder, huh, given that the January 6th people were treated so harshly and put in jail,

00:14:56.860 a lot of these people destroying property and doing these things, probably in jail by now, right?

00:15:02.940 No, you'd be wrong.

00:15:04.180 They've already been released.

00:15:05.640 Charges dropped.

00:15:07.560 Now, are they exactly comparable?

00:15:10.500 Well, it depends if you're brainwashed.

00:15:13.540 If you're brainwashed, you think January 6th was an insurrection.

00:15:17.400 If you're not brainwashed, you say, one's a protest, the other's a protest, property got destroyed, property got destroyed.

00:15:27.800 Shouldn't they be roughly the same?

00:15:30.820 Nope, because one's a brainwashing event.

00:15:34.040 And in order for the brainwashing to work, the brainwashers have to put those people in jail. 0.73

00:15:39.620 Otherwise, their message wouldn't make sense.

00:15:42.460 They can't say, there was an insurrection.

00:15:44.740 What are you going to do about it?

00:15:45.680 Ah, charges dropped.

00:15:47.620 So they sort of have to pretend the charges are real and that it was an insurrection.

00:15:53.660 All right, here's an update on what we call the coup, which is the replacement of Biden by Harris.

00:15:59.660 Seymour Hersh, investigative journalist kind of guy, he says he's got a scoop here that Obama actually threatened Biden with the 25th Amendment

00:16:10.500 and said that Kamala Harris was on board with it.

00:16:13.980 Now, is that really new news?

00:16:18.960 It's new news in the sense that somebody is saying some specifics about who said what or did what.

00:16:24.960 But is there any surprise there?

00:16:28.240 Didn't you all know that the top Democrats threatened Biden?

00:16:31.520 And that, of course, the 25th Amendment was part of the threat?

00:16:36.740 Of course.

00:16:38.700 Is anybody surprised by that?

00:16:41.300 Now, this one's a real hard one to evaluate for me.

00:16:46.980 Because on one hand, I completely understand the concept that there was something like a coup, at least a coup within the Democrat Party, not within the country itself.

00:16:59.560 But given that it is also literally true that Biden's brain was not capable of finishing the journey, and given it's true that Democrats can use whatever process they want to decide who their candidate is, there's no law against it.

00:17:16.200 So, I'm not so sure it's a coup.

00:17:20.800 It's definitely reducing something that Democrat voters thought they wanted, but now that they have more information, I'm sure they didn't want it, really.

00:17:31.380 So, I think the coup thing is maybe overstated.

00:17:36.620 To me, it looks like Democrats do what Democrats do, which is ignoring their own voters in favor of making sure that the leaders in the Democrat Party get the candidate they want.

00:17:49.680 Now, if you're a Democrat and you don't have a problem with that, why should I?

00:17:55.360 It's their process.

00:17:56.860 They can make their process whatever they want.

00:17:58.780 And if they don't like their leaders gaming the system to get Bernie Sanders out, they don't like the system game to get Kamali in, not really our problem.

00:18:11.280 I would say it's not a national problem.

00:18:13.480 It's just that Democrats can choose any way they want.

00:18:18.080 All right.

00:18:18.800 Trump gave a speech at the Bitcoin convention, and I'm going to really annoy you on this story, and I apologize in advance.

00:18:28.780 Here's my take.

00:18:31.040 I think this was the best speech I've ever seen Trump give.

00:18:35.460 Now, keep in mind, it was designed for a specific audience in a specific time, so you have to judge it within its specific domain, not compared to, let's say, his stump speeches.

00:18:47.420 I thought he was more relaxed, more funny, more connected with the crowd, and somehow he did this spanning generations thing like I've never seen in my life.

00:19:00.440 So he managed to use enough buzzwords and show enough familiarity with crypto that he felt younger than his age.

00:19:09.500 But at the same time, he was making sure that you knew he was taking advice from the younger, smarter, you know, the vakes, et cetera, the people who you trust do know this domain.

00:19:20.860 And so he was very cleverly acting young and then showing his work.

00:19:27.660 Here are the people who are advising me.

00:19:29.920 Look how smart they are.

00:19:31.040 Great.

00:19:32.020 And then he had specific technical sounding recommendations about things that I can't judge.

00:19:38.880 So when I say that this was, in my opinion, maybe the best public presentation he's ever given, and he's already starting at best in the world.

00:19:49.280 So I was blown away, honestly, just the quality of his communication skills, just crazy stuff, crazy.

00:19:59.660 But here are a few things he said.

00:20:01.540 And again, I'm not going to evaluate these based on whether they make sense, because I'm not a crypto expert.

00:20:12.960 So I don't know.

00:20:13.660 But let me, here's a few things he said.

00:20:18.440 We'll see you next time.

00:20:48.440 Fabulous for less.

00:20:50.320 He said he wants to fire the, I guess this is the head of the SEC, Gary Gensler.

00:20:57.500 And he gets this huge applause.

00:21:00.040 And then because he's so good at what he does, Trump, he pauses and goes, wow, I wasn't expecting that.

00:21:06.720 He says, I'm just going to say it again.

00:21:08.760 So he says it, gets a big applause.

00:21:14.020 He waits and goes, I'm just going to say it again.

00:21:16.580 And then he just says it again, that he's going to fire this guy in the first day in office.

00:21:20.760 And the crowd goes wild.

00:21:22.200 And watching Trump toy with the energy of the crowd is a whole different level than giving a good speech.

00:21:32.900 He's actually manipulating their energy directly.

00:21:38.060 If you don't see that, you're missing the show.

00:21:41.440 He's an energy monster.

00:21:43.180 So as soon as he felt that energy, he was like, whoa, okay, let's do that again.

00:21:48.760 And then he just does it again, spontaneously, because he's just so good at this.

00:21:54.240 He just feels the room.

00:21:55.580 He feels the energy.

00:21:57.020 And he matches it.

00:21:58.140 Now, of course, he was pandering in the sense that he was there to tell them what they wanted to hear so they'd be on his side and vote for him.

00:22:05.220 But here are some of the things he said besides firing that SEC commissioner, who some say is sort of a roadblock to some of the innovative things that the Bitcoin world wants to do.

00:22:16.840 I don't know the details of that.

00:22:18.760 But he wants to, Trump said he'd shut down something called Operation Chokepoint 2.0, which I guess is limiting Bitcoin or somehow.

00:22:29.020 And he'd create a Bitcoin and crypto presidential advisory board.

00:22:34.320 And in 100 days, he'd have better crypto rules written.

00:22:38.400 I love that.

00:22:39.920 Now, again, it's sort of general, but he's telling you exactly what it would look like.

00:22:45.240 I will not personally make the decisions.

00:22:47.240 I will form a board of really smart people.

00:22:50.060 In 100 days, those smart people will tell us what to do with crypto.

00:22:54.000 Oh, my God, do I love hearing that.

00:22:56.840 Here's what I don't like.

00:22:58.520 Trump's going to steal your democracy because of his character.

00:23:02.980 He's going to steal your democracy.

00:23:05.240 No.

00:23:07.120 I'm not impressed with that.

00:23:08.680 Here's what I'm impressed with.

00:23:10.020 I'm going to fire the SEC guy.

00:23:12.840 I'm going to get rid of this Operation Chokepoint.

00:23:16.140 I'm going to have an advisory council on crypto.

00:23:18.340 In 100 days, we'll have new rules.

00:23:20.760 Thank you.

00:23:21.440 I can evaluate that.

00:23:24.320 I can say that's putting the right priority in the right place, etc.

00:23:28.760 I said there will never be a CBDC, you know, a crypto from the government, and we'll defend the right to self-custody, freedom of transactions, freedom of association, freedom of speech.

00:23:42.480 And he'll support USD stablecoins and global savings in bitcoins, and he says the government will never spend its bitcoins, and he'll maybe create some kind of a reserve and blah, blah, blah.

00:23:58.120 Now, are those all good ideas?

00:24:01.480 I don't know.

00:24:03.220 I don't know.

00:24:05.000 Are they?

00:24:06.740 Maybe I should look into it a little bit.

00:24:08.660 I don't know.

00:24:09.040 Well, I did hear some people saying, oh, we hate, I don't know, some idea, or he didn't say enough or said too much or something.

00:24:17.140 But remember, the Bitcoin community is a bunch of people who don't agree with each other.

00:24:21.680 So he's not going to go to the Bitcoin community, which is literally just a bunch of people who disagree with each other, and get them all to agree.

00:24:30.260 So that wasn't really something he could do.

00:24:32.760 But here's what he could do.

00:24:34.360 He could say, you're a huge high priority.

00:24:37.400 He did.

00:24:37.800 He could talk like he's got the right people involved.

00:24:41.080 He did.

00:24:41.880 He could work the crowd and the energy, which he did, like I've never seen before.

00:24:48.200 And he can make sure that they know that they're important and part of the future and that we can't let China become the crypto king.

00:24:58.320 We have to be the crypto king in this.

00:25:00.080 It was everything.

00:25:00.700 It felt like he talked about the future.

00:25:03.980 It was like he had his arms around it.

00:25:07.120 And here's the thing.

00:25:08.500 I cannot imagine Kamala Harris having that conversation. 0.63

00:25:13.380 I actually don't think she's smart enough.

00:25:16.660 Now, of course, Trump was bluffing because he's a good bullshitter, but I think he at least understood the basics of everything he said.

00:25:25.500 I think he understood what a stable coin is.

00:25:30.380 I think he understood that there were regulations getting in the way.

00:25:35.460 I mean, on a conceptual level, he seemed to understand it.

00:25:38.840 And that's kind of impressive.

00:25:40.400 He made himself look like he was 25 and, I don't know, what is he, 78 or something, at the same time.

00:25:48.800 I've never seen anything like that.

00:25:50.640 He looked young and experienced at the same time.

00:25:54.020 What a thing.

00:25:55.220 Now, here's where I'm really going to make you mad, and I apologize in advance.

00:25:59.900 But it's just too important not to mention.

00:26:02.580 Remember I told you that I taught Chad Chibiti how to hypnotize? 1.00

00:26:07.720 Now, when I say hypnotize, I'm talking about a sort of a waking hypnosis, just a word-related thing.

00:26:14.780 Not NLP.

00:26:15.900 I'm not a big NLP guy.

00:26:17.820 But just something super persuasive.

00:26:21.120 And I told you I wouldn't teach it to you because it was too powerful.

00:26:25.540 It is.

00:26:27.020 And when I taught Chad GPT to do it to me, it was too powerful.

00:26:33.800 And so I can't tell you what it was.

00:26:35.460 But I will tell you, I heard Trump use the technique at his speech.

00:26:39.760 And when he did, it just blew me off my chair.

00:26:43.700 Now, I can't tell you what it was.

00:26:46.660 But he had a persuasive technique that I don't remember seeing.

00:26:52.660 Maybe I should pay more attention, but I hadn't seen him use it before.

00:26:55.800 And when he did, it just went right through me.

00:26:57.940 And I said to myself, I cannot tell you what that was.

00:27:02.560 Because you won't be able to pick it out yourself.

00:27:05.140 You can listen to him all day, and you just wouldn't see it.

00:27:08.160 But my God.

00:27:10.500 And I think that's just natural.

00:27:12.300 I don't believe that he studied that.

00:27:14.620 I think that was just natural.

00:27:15.960 And you'd have to know what I was talking about to know how powerful it was.

00:27:23.160 But that was, in my opinion, that's the best speech he's ever given.

00:27:26.620 In fact, one of the best political speeches anybody's ever given.

00:27:31.760 I mean, maybe Kennedy had a couple of bangers.

00:27:34.880 But, you know, Lincoln had a good day.

00:27:36.960 But this is one of the best.

00:27:38.380 It really was.

00:27:39.080 Then a Wyoming senator, Senator Cynthia Loomis, don't know her.

00:27:44.420 But she made this claim, and I don't know how to understand this.

00:27:49.100 She said that with a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the United States,

00:27:53.000 we would have an asset that can cut our debt in half by 2045.

00:27:58.000 How?

00:28:00.120 Let's say the government buys a bunch of Bitcoin.

00:28:04.860 And then the Bitcoin goes up in value.

00:28:09.080 If we don't do anything with it and just hold it,

00:28:12.260 how does that reduce the deficit?

00:28:17.540 And we just add it as an asset against your liabilities.

00:28:22.860 But you still have to pay off.

00:28:25.160 You still have to pay it, even though you have a balancing asset.

00:28:29.220 So if you monetize your Bitcoin and used it to pay off the dollar debt,

00:28:35.240 then you've got inflation because you just introduced several trillion dollars of Bitcoin

00:28:40.640 into what had been the cash part of the economy.

00:28:44.720 So I don't understand how that can work.

00:28:47.240 But this may have more to do with my understanding than whether it works.

00:28:51.680 So if somebody knows what they're talking about,

00:28:54.880 it would be awesome if you could explain to me,

00:28:57.000 can Bitcoin somehow help us cut the deficit?

00:29:01.680 In the comments, does anybody see that as a thing?

00:29:05.420 Because when I was asking the question,

00:29:07.300 because I was sort of naively asking,

00:29:09.680 is there any way crypto could help us in the debt?

00:29:12.100 And 100% of the people who knew what they were talking about said no.

00:29:19.360 Because there is no way that it doesn't ultimately create inflation.

00:29:25.880 You can't just add money.

00:29:28.740 And I thought maybe there's some way, you know, subtract this, add this.

00:29:33.000 But I couldn't come up with one.

00:29:34.660 And nobody else thought it was worth even thinking about, really.

00:29:38.100 So maybe, but I don't know how that would work.

00:29:43.360 Joel Pollack is reporting that Trump was very supportive

00:29:47.660 of his female Secret Service agents.

00:29:51.980 And even though people were making lots of DEI comments,

00:29:56.540 Trump wants you to know what he said,

00:29:58.660 that the female agent who guarded him, you know, wasn't as big as him,

00:30:04.080 but she was criticized because she wasn't tall enough. 0.99

00:30:06.820 But she was shielding me with everything.

00:30:09.220 Basically, he went on saying how brave she was.

00:30:12.360 You know, she ran toward the bullets,

00:30:14.080 put herself between the bullets and him, and did not hesitate.

00:30:18.620 And I would like to add to that and say, yes.

00:30:21.900 Just to be sure,

00:30:24.680 I do think that DEI still has to be looked at

00:30:27.700 because you probably do want bigger people guarding bigger people.

00:30:32.480 But I'm not going to take away from her skill or bravery.

00:30:38.980 She was brave.

00:30:40.300 There was more than one.

00:30:41.540 You know, there was one that maybe wasn't regular Secret Service

00:30:44.440 that looked a little out of sorts.

00:30:47.100 We had some fun with that.

00:30:48.520 But the main one who was on him and stayed with him to the car

00:30:51.960 apparently has a good reputation with the family

00:30:55.480 and is considered quite a, you know, valuable employee.

00:31:00.400 So I think two things could be true.

00:31:03.980 You know, I think the DEI has to be looked at in that context.

00:31:06.740 But you could also say that she's a star

00:31:08.640 and that she's a hero

00:31:10.460 and that she did her job the way you'd want her to do it.

00:31:15.300 So let's give her that credit.

00:31:20.100 Well, we keep hearing more

00:31:21.700 and some of it gets revised

00:31:23.260 about what happened on the assassination day

00:31:25.600 in near Butler, Pennsylvania.

00:31:28.840 And one of the things we're hearing was

00:31:31.020 I heard a story that I heard it debunked.

00:31:35.080 So I don't know if this is true.

00:31:36.600 The story was that there was a room full of

00:31:40.640 there should have been three police snipers in the unit

00:31:46.060 that would have had a way to overlook the roof.

00:31:51.340 And the reason that they didn't see the shooter climb on the roof

00:31:54.760 was that one of the three didn't come to work.

00:31:58.200 Now, this has been disputed.

00:32:00.380 So I'll just tell you what somebody who was there said

00:32:03.620 and just know it's disputed.

00:32:06.440 So one of them didn't come to work.

00:32:08.860 Then there were two of them.

00:32:10.640 And then the word came out

00:32:12.120 that there was somebody suspicious.

00:32:14.220 So one of the two thought,

00:32:16.240 well, I better go look around.

00:32:18.760 So one of the two goes and looks around.

00:32:21.540 But when he tries to go back in the building,

00:32:23.540 having not found anything,

00:32:25.380 because I think actually the shooter

00:32:27.200 was climbing on the building

00:32:28.360 at the time he was looking around on the ground.

00:32:32.260 So then he goes back to the building

00:32:33.960 and he doesn't have his passkey

00:32:35.700 to get back in the building.

00:32:37.200 So he has to call the guy that's in that room,

00:32:39.460 the one place where you could have seen the guy on the roof.

00:32:42.520 Remember, there should have been three,

00:32:44.420 but now it's down to one person in that room.

00:32:46.860 So the guy outside calls the guy

00:32:48.720 and he has to come down and let him into the door.

00:32:51.720 And during that time,

00:32:53.180 allegedly the shooter got on the roof.

00:32:58.360 Now, does that sound like a Dilbert reason?

00:33:01.440 Yes, it does.

00:33:02.760 It sounds like a Dilbert reason.

00:33:04.520 Now, keep in mind

00:33:05.480 that that sequence of events

00:33:10.120 is disputed by somebody else who was there

00:33:12.420 and knows what's happening

00:33:14.320 and said, nothing like that happened.

00:33:16.700 That must be all made up.

00:33:18.420 And then there was one we heard,

00:33:21.980 I just heard today,

00:33:23.480 that the local cops never told the Secret Service

00:33:29.080 that were around Trump's body,

00:33:31.860 you know, the actual body people near the stage.

00:33:34.860 They were never told that there was a suspicious person.

00:33:38.660 So there was a communication gap.

00:33:41.400 So while they were tracking somebody

00:33:43.440 that they knew had a range finder

00:33:45.020 and was, you know, a variable that was sketchy,

00:33:50.620 the people guarding the president most closely

00:33:53.060 never heard it.

00:33:54.480 So the question we all have been asking ourselves is,

00:33:57.540 why didn't they immediately delay him from going on

00:34:00.840 or take him off immediately

00:34:01.980 as soon as there was some question?

00:34:03.900 And the answer is, they never heard the question.

00:34:06.820 Now, is that true?

00:34:08.760 Everything we've heard so far

00:34:10.380 seems open to be revised.

00:34:13.240 So I'm not sure you could take any of the accounts

00:34:16.640 as true at this point.

00:34:18.020 There's just too much weirdness going on here.

00:34:20.620 But so far, everything suggests

00:34:23.340 that the failures that day were, in fact,

00:34:26.380 regular, ordinary, Dilbert, pointy-haired boss failures.

00:34:31.340 Failures of communication, failure of coordination,

00:34:34.640 failure of management, failure of leadership,

00:34:37.940 failure of good judgment,

00:34:39.520 and then just some weird things that happened

00:34:41.420 like you forget your access card.

00:34:44.000 Right?

00:34:45.380 So, but,

00:34:46.640 that still leaves plenty of room

00:34:49.700 for bad behavior

00:34:51.720 because I do still think

00:34:53.740 there's a really high chance

00:34:55.420 that somebody hypnotized

00:34:57.860 or brainwashed the shooter

00:34:59.780 because we still don't know

00:35:02.340 who he was talking to

00:35:03.900 and he had some foreign connections

00:35:05.620 and some encrypted apps

00:35:07.560 and not enough regular friends

00:35:09.280 and it sure looks like he was talking to somebody.

00:35:13.500 And we don't know if that somebody was one of ours

00:35:16.240 or an Iranian asset

00:35:18.720 or some other kind of asset.

00:35:22.040 But I do think that if it was some kind of a state actor

00:35:25.600 who hypnotized this guy,

00:35:28.200 it's possible that the state actor was smart enough

00:35:30.980 that even if he found out what accounts he was talking to,

00:35:34.300 you'd never find out who it was.

00:35:35.580 So, we may never know.

00:35:38.800 But still there's possibility

00:35:40.280 of some conspiracy theory involved here,

00:35:43.040 but probably not day of.

00:35:45.460 It looks like just incompetence on day of.

00:35:47.960 All right.

00:35:51.260 I was making fun on X

00:35:54.020 because the CNN fact checker Daniel Dale

00:35:57.640 seemed to be everywhere

00:35:59.780 when Trump gives a speech,

00:36:01.580 but he sort of disappears a little bit

00:36:03.920 when Harris is out there lying.

00:36:07.060 Now, correct me if I'm wrong,

00:36:09.040 but nearly 100% of Biden's claims

00:36:11.540 during the short time he was in the race

00:36:15.100 were false, were they not?

00:36:17.960 Were there any claims that Biden made about the election?

00:36:21.780 And now these claims are going over to Kamala Harris. 0.99

00:36:25.500 Are there any claims that Kamala Harris makes

00:36:27.820 that are actually true?

00:36:30.000 I don't know if I've seen one.

00:36:32.360 Have you?

00:36:33.740 She'll make claims about how the administration did, 0.95

00:36:37.960 and those all seem to be fake.

00:36:40.780 She'll make claims about what Trump plans to do,

00:36:44.220 which look all fake to me.

00:36:46.020 So has she ever told the truth about anything, actually?

00:36:50.200 Literally anything.

00:36:51.400 Is there one example where she told the truth

00:36:54.180 with the right context?

00:36:55.200 And I can't think of one.

00:36:56.680 And I mean that I can't think of one.

00:37:00.480 Actually, zero times I can think of

00:37:02.880 when she told the truth.

00:37:04.400 And yet, still,

00:37:06.260 their idiot fucking Democrats

00:37:08.480 believe that there's only one liar in the race.

00:37:11.280 Why?

00:37:11.620 Because people like Daniel Dale

00:37:13.440 are apparently not doing their job.

00:37:16.280 However,

00:37:17.640 Daniel Dale just

00:37:19.860 showed up on the job.

00:37:22.760 And apparently,

00:37:24.380 he

00:37:25.660 debunked the whole Project 2025 thing,

00:37:29.580 which is the primary

00:37:30.780 campaign

00:37:31.840 claim

00:37:33.460 of Harris.

00:37:35.060 Her biggest claim 0.52

00:37:36.340 is that this Project 2025,

00:37:38.360 which is from the Heritage Group,

00:37:40.200 not from Trump,

00:37:41.480 is that it's Trump's.

00:37:43.400 Trump has

00:37:43.840 disavowed it.

00:37:45.960 Every bit of evidence

00:37:46.840 shows it's a separate group.

00:37:48.900 He has his own policies,

00:37:50.380 which are not from that.

00:37:51.860 You can see them yourself.

00:37:53.540 It very much

00:37:54.440 is debunked.

00:37:56.240 But you don't expect it

00:37:57.600 to get debunked

00:37:58.540 by anything that

00:38:00.300 any Democrat would ever see.

00:38:02.500 What would you do

00:38:03.400 if you were a Democrat

00:38:04.260 and you thought

00:38:05.580 the main reason

00:38:06.760 that the Harris campaign

00:38:07.740 was trying to save you

00:38:08.980 was to keep you

00:38:10.140 from Project 2025 policies,

00:38:12.520 and then your own news

00:38:14.180 says,

00:38:14.700 no,

00:38:14.880 that's not true.

00:38:16.840 He's not in favor

00:38:17.760 of that stuff.

00:38:19.940 Now,

00:38:20.440 of course,

00:38:20.820 there's some overlap

00:38:21.600 because some of it's just

00:38:22.480 ordinary conservative stuff,

00:38:24.400 but that's not really

00:38:25.340 the issue.

00:38:28.420 So,

00:38:29.080 that's a big deal.

00:38:31.200 But I do think

00:38:32.700 that Daniel Dale

00:38:33.560 has probably

00:38:34.460 got a lot to answer for

00:38:35.940 for how much

00:38:37.220 Harris says

00:38:38.000 every single day

00:38:38.880 and doesn't get

00:38:39.460 fact-checked on CNN.

00:38:41.260 He's the fact-checker.

00:38:42.900 I feel like the fact-checker

00:38:44.480 should say

00:38:45.060 every single day,

00:38:47.060 well,

00:38:47.680 there's no evidence

00:38:48.360 that Trump's going to

00:38:49.100 steal your democracy.

00:38:51.140 And he should say

00:38:52.460 there's no evidence

00:38:53.780 that the intention

00:38:55.000 of the January 6th people

00:38:56.540 was a coup

00:38:57.280 because that would be true.

00:38:58.900 but I don't think

00:38:59.880 he's able to say that.

00:39:01.100 It's too late.

00:39:02.600 I think he says

00:39:03.400 the opposite.

00:39:05.000 Well,

00:39:05.240 Trump wants to end

00:39:06.000 birthright citizenship,

00:39:07.960 at least in May

00:39:08.980 of last year

00:39:09.520 he said that,

00:39:11.180 so that if you're

00:39:12.520 born here

00:39:13.160 but you're born

00:39:13.840 to parents

00:39:15.580 who are not here

00:39:16.320 legally,

00:39:17.300 neither of them,

00:39:18.200 then maybe you would

00:39:18.980 not be a birthright citizen.

00:39:21.060 He thinks he can end

00:39:21.940 that with an executive order.

00:39:24.280 I think that would end up

00:39:25.520 going to the Supreme Court.

00:39:27.180 I think the Supreme Court

00:39:28.240 would overrule it.

00:39:30.400 But,

00:39:31.160 just a guess.

00:39:33.620 Anyway,

00:39:35.140 one of the things

00:39:36.360 Trump said is

00:39:37.020 the United States

00:39:37.700 is among the only

00:39:38.760 countries in the world

00:39:39.780 that says

00:39:40.900 even if neither parent

00:39:41.940 is a citizen

00:39:42.640 or even lawfully

00:39:43.500 in the country

00:39:44.020 their children

00:39:45.020 can be citizens.

00:39:46.980 And,

00:39:47.620 I got some questions

00:39:49.160 about that.

00:39:49.980 Which countries

00:39:51.100 allow that?

00:39:51.980 can you name

00:39:54.420 a country

00:39:54.840 that does allow

00:39:55.840 the child

00:39:56.920 born there

00:39:57.440 to be a citizen

00:39:58.120 if the parents

00:39:59.620 are not

00:40:00.160 and are not there

00:40:01.340 legally?

00:40:02.080 It'd be one thing

00:40:03.000 if the parents

00:40:03.740 were there legally

00:40:04.680 but not as citizens.

00:40:06.540 But,

00:40:07.100 if you're there

00:40:07.460 illegally,

00:40:08.700 both of your parents,

00:40:10.900 I think Trump's

00:40:11.860 got an argument.

00:40:13.440 The argument

00:40:14.060 would be

00:40:14.500 you don't want

00:40:15.040 to incentivize

00:40:15.880 that behavior.

00:40:16.520 So,

00:40:18.600 but I don't know

00:40:19.120 if it's going to pass

00:40:20.040 any constitutional muster.

00:40:22.320 I suspect not

00:40:23.320 because the constitution

00:40:24.680 seems pretty clear

00:40:25.860 on that point.

00:40:27.260 Ontario,

00:40:28.220 the wait is over.

00:40:29.720 The gold standard

00:40:30.460 of online casinos

00:40:31.460 has arrived.

00:40:32.560 Golden Nugget

00:40:33.240 Online Casino

00:40:34.100 is live,

00:40:34.820 bringing Vegas-style

00:40:35.780 excitement

00:40:36.260 and a world-class

00:40:37.320 gaming experience

00:40:38.280 right to your fingertips.

00:40:40.160 Whether you're

00:40:40.600 a seasoned player

00:40:41.360 or just starting,

00:40:42.500 signing up is fast

00:40:43.440 and simple.

00:40:44.620 And in just a few clicks,

00:40:45.900 you can have access

00:40:46.500 to our exclusive library

00:40:47.920 of the best slots

00:40:48.980 and top-tier table games.

00:40:50.900 Make the most

00:40:51.480 of your downtime

00:40:52.120 with unbeatable promotions

00:40:53.680 and jackpots

00:40:54.480 that can turn

00:40:54.980 any mundane moment

00:40:56.260 into a golden opportunity

00:40:57.780 at Golden Nugget

00:40:59.040 Online Casino.

00:41:00.340 Take a spin

00:41:00.840 on the slots,

00:41:01.700 challenge yourself

00:41:02.260 at the tables,

00:41:03.080 or join a live dealer game

00:41:04.500 to feel the thrill

00:41:05.500 of real-time action,

00:41:06.820 all from the comfort

00:41:07.760 of your own devices.

00:41:09.020 Why settle for less

00:41:10.000 when you can go

00:41:10.760 for the gold

00:41:11.500 at Golden Nugget

00:41:12.800 Online Casino?

00:41:14.320 Gambling problem

00:41:15.120 call ConnexOntario.

00:41:16.340 1-866-531-2600.

00:41:19.540 19 and over.

00:41:20.440 Physically present

00:41:21.000 in Ontario.

00:41:21.820 Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:41:23.440 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com

00:41:25.140 for details.

00:41:25.920 Please play responsibly.

00:41:27.620 So,

00:41:28.660 one of the funniest

00:41:29.660 sub-stories

00:41:30.500 in politics

00:41:31.800 is

00:41:32.600 Mark Cuban's

00:41:34.760 embarrassing foray

00:41:36.100 in public

00:41:36.660 arguing that

00:41:37.720 the DEI

00:41:38.560 doesn't mean

00:41:39.740 equity

00:41:40.300 means

00:41:40.820 equal outcomes.

00:41:42.760 These are some

00:41:43.500 of his quotes.

00:41:44.180 he said

00:41:44.800 on X.

00:41:45.780 Quote,

00:41:46.160 I'm sorry,

00:41:46.880 but I can say

00:41:47.480 with 100% certainty,

00:41:49.800 confidence,

00:41:50.540 I think,

00:41:51.160 that equity,

00:41:52.100 that the equity

00:41:52.800 part of DEI

00:41:53.820 does not mean

00:41:54.940 equal outcomes.

00:41:57.060 People.

00:41:58.140 It doesn't mean

00:41:58.880 equal outcomes.

00:42:00.100 He said

00:42:01.020 more than once.

00:42:02.540 He also said

00:42:03.220 diversity

00:42:04.200 is meritocracy.

00:42:05.540 So,

00:42:05.740 no,

00:42:06.120 equity never

00:42:06.840 means equal outcomes.

00:42:08.500 I don't know

00:42:08.900 how you create

00:42:09.520 equal outcomes

00:42:10.460 in a company.

00:42:11.700 So,

00:42:12.000 he admits that

00:42:12.700 if it were

00:42:14.180 equal outcomes,

00:42:15.600 it would be absurd.

00:42:17.560 It's not something

00:42:18.180 you could actually do.

00:42:21.180 And

00:42:21.700 then he is being

00:42:23.840 presented with

00:42:24.500 lots of videos

00:42:25.580 and audios

00:42:26.380 of Kamala Harris

00:42:27.780 saying

00:42:28.060 exactly

00:42:29.280 that she means

00:42:30.920 equity

00:42:31.380 as in

00:42:31.920 equal outcomes.

00:42:32.800 and she does

00:42:35.000 not mean

00:42:35.420 meritocracy.

00:42:38.040 Now,

00:42:38.840 if that were me,

00:42:41.240 you know,

00:42:41.820 I don't get

00:42:42.300 embarrassed at anything,

00:42:43.340 but that would

00:42:44.860 certainly challenge

00:42:45.760 my

00:42:46.200 ability

00:42:47.860 to not get

00:42:48.520 embarrassed.

00:42:49.440 I mean,

00:42:49.640 he really made

00:42:50.480 a big and arrogant

00:42:51.680 deal

00:42:52.220 about,

00:42:53.420 look,

00:42:53.760 you idiot

00:42:54.460 Republicans,

00:42:55.600 how do you not

00:42:56.560 understand it

00:42:57.200 couldn't possibly

00:42:58.160 mean equal outcomes

00:42:59.280 because that would

00:43:00.400 be absurd.

00:43:01.100 Right?

00:43:02.800 and it does

00:43:04.060 mean equal

00:43:04.500 outcomes

00:43:05.000 and it is

00:43:07.140 absurd

00:43:07.520 and he knows

00:43:10.420 that.

00:43:11.400 By now,

00:43:12.060 he knows that

00:43:12.860 Kamala Harris

00:43:13.660 has a completely

00:43:14.820 different idea

00:43:15.480 of equity

00:43:15.900 than he thought

00:43:16.580 was even

00:43:17.020 possible

00:43:17.480 and so what

00:43:18.680 did he do?

00:43:19.960 Did he say,

00:43:20.640 oh,

00:43:21.020 well,

00:43:21.460 I'm wrong

00:43:21.860 about that

00:43:22.560 so,

00:43:24.140 you know,

00:43:24.480 she's pushing

00:43:25.300 something that

00:43:25.880 would obviously

00:43:26.320 destroy the

00:43:27.020 country

00:43:27.380 so I guess

00:43:28.600 I can't

00:43:29.620 promote her. 0.89

00:43:30.400 No,

00:43:31.300 he endorsed

00:43:31.680 her.

00:43:32.340 He endorsed

00:43:32.700 her.

00:43:33.420 So we still

00:43:34.380 don't know

00:43:34.720 what's going

00:43:35.100 on with

00:43:35.540 Mark Cuban

00:43:36.080 but there's

00:43:38.080 some things

00:43:38.480 we can

00:43:38.800 rule out.

00:43:41.660 We can

00:43:42.600 rule out

00:43:43.280 he understands

00:43:44.700 politics.

00:43:47.820 Maybe that's

00:43:48.560 the whole

00:43:48.860 explanation

00:43:49.420 because I

00:43:51.380 don't see

00:43:51.760 any possibility

00:43:52.580 he would

00:43:52.960 have made

00:43:53.220 that big

00:43:53.640 argument

00:43:53.980 in public

00:43:54.480 if he

00:43:56.280 actually

00:43:56.620 understood

00:43:57.120 that it

00:43:57.480 was completely

00:43:57.980 the opposite

00:43:58.480 of reality.

00:43:59.580 I don't

00:43:59.920 think he

00:44:00.340 would have

00:44:00.600 done it

00:44:01.000 and I'll

00:44:03.580 you know

00:44:03.980 some of

00:44:04.340 you don't

00:44:04.600 like this

00:44:05.060 but I

00:44:05.520 will stand

00:44:06.460 by my

00:44:06.920 statement

00:44:07.260 he's not

00:44:07.900 dumb

00:44:08.320 that's not

00:44:09.620 what's going

00:44:10.020 on

00:44:10.340 he's very

00:44:10.980 smart

00:44:11.440 he's proved

00:44:12.480 it a hundred

00:44:12.940 different times

00:44:13.660 but it

00:44:15.020 could be

00:44:15.600 just that

00:44:16.620 the news

00:44:17.160 is so

00:44:17.620 brainwashy

00:44:18.460 on his

00:44:18.800 side of

00:44:19.100 the world

00:44:19.380 he just

00:44:19.880 isn't

00:44:21.000 seeing the

00:44:21.540 obvious

00:44:22.040 important

00:44:22.620 stories

00:44:23.260 maybe

00:44:24.120 maybe that's

00:44:25.320 all it

00:44:25.560 takes

00:44:25.820 so he's

00:44:27.140 still a

00:44:27.440 mystery

00:44:27.760 but

00:44:28.840 this is

00:44:30.280 fascinating

00:44:31.080 how wrong

00:44:32.160 he could

00:44:32.460 be about

00:44:32.860 something

00:44:33.300 so vital

00:44:34.860 to the

00:44:35.700 future

00:44:36.160 of the

00:44:36.360 country

00:44:36.620 I mean

00:44:36.960 really

00:44:37.620 few things

00:44:38.340 are more

00:44:38.620 important

00:44:38.940 than that

00:44:39.460 because it

00:44:40.900 will destroy

00:44:41.400 the entire

00:44:41.820 country

00:44:42.240 anyway

00:44:45.080 Kamala Harris

00:44:47.340 has also

00:44:47.900 said in the

00:44:48.380 past that

00:44:48.840 she's open

00:44:49.340 to packing

00:44:49.820 the

00:44:50.060 Supreme

00:44:50.340 Court

00:44:50.700 and

00:44:52.540 how would

00:44:54.220 that go

00:44:54.800 have you

00:44:56.400 noticed

00:44:56.740 Kamala Harris

00:44:58.660 always has

00:44:59.260 this sort

00:44:59.680 of half

00:45:00.120 opinion

00:45:00.600 doesn't

00:45:01.900 look like

00:45:03.080 it's

00:45:03.260 thought out

00:45:03.780 in the

00:45:04.060 long run

00:45:04.520 it's with

00:45:06.840 everything

00:45:07.260 it's a

00:45:08.760 complete

00:45:09.160 inability

00:45:09.640 to see

00:45:10.460 cause and

00:45:11.600 effect

00:45:12.100 over time

00:45:13.280 because

00:45:14.780 if they

00:45:15.680 packed the

00:45:16.180 court

00:45:16.520 what would

00:45:18.500 the Republicans

00:45:19.160 do when they

00:45:19.860 get in office

00:45:20.420 next

00:45:20.940 pack the

00:45:22.480 court

00:45:22.720 and then

00:45:23.780 you would

00:45:24.120 have taken

00:45:24.520 from the

00:45:25.260 constitution

00:45:25.920 and the

00:45:26.400 country

00:45:26.780 the entire

00:45:28.640 foundation

00:45:30.120 of the

00:45:30.820 constitution

00:45:31.580 because if

00:45:32.480 you don't

00:45:32.760 have separation

00:45:33.540 of those

00:45:34.900 entities

00:45:35.360 where they

00:45:35.960 can operate

00:45:36.480 independently

00:45:37.100 and of

00:45:38.080 course if

00:45:38.480 they were

00:45:38.720 going to

00:45:38.920 get packed

00:45:39.460 and repacked

00:45:40.140 and repacked

00:45:40.840 they could

00:45:41.740 never operate

00:45:42.460 independently

00:45:42.960 they would

00:45:43.780 just give

00:45:44.400 the executive

00:45:44.920 branch

00:45:45.320 exactly what

00:45:46.160 they want

00:45:46.560 now the

00:45:48.060 the left

00:45:50.800 could argue

00:45:51.440 but that's

00:45:52.640 the way it

00:45:52.900 is now

00:45:53.320 because it's

00:45:53.960 packed with

00:45:54.400 conservatives

00:45:54.940 so they're

00:45:55.360 just going to

00:45:55.760 give everything

00:45:56.320 the conservatives

00:45:56.960 want

00:45:57.420 except that

00:45:58.640 hasn't happened

00:45:59.280 that hasn't

00:46:00.840 happened

00:46:01.200 we've seen

00:46:02.820 that they've

00:46:03.440 you know

00:46:03.840 the conservatives

00:46:04.500 and liberals

00:46:05.280 have crossed

00:46:05.880 sides

00:46:06.220 several times

00:46:07.240 so

00:46:08.520 to me

00:46:10.440 the most

00:46:10.920 credible

00:46:11.620 outcome

00:46:12.100 from a

00:46:12.660 supreme court

00:46:13.200 decision

00:46:13.620 is where

00:46:14.540 at least

00:46:15.240 one person

00:46:16.000 crossed over

00:46:16.720 I look

00:46:18.320 for that

00:46:18.800 as much

00:46:19.700 as I

00:46:20.420 can find

00:46:21.220 it

00:46:21.420 so that

00:46:22.400 you know

00:46:22.680 it's not

00:46:23.080 just who

00:46:23.660 got appointed

00:46:24.280 makes all

00:46:25.160 the decisions

00:46:25.740 so every

00:46:26.980 now and then

00:46:27.420 they'll surprise

00:46:27.980 us

00:46:28.300 but no

00:46:30.120 packing the

00:46:31.220 court would

00:46:31.680 be stupid

00:46:32.680 it would

00:46:34.280 be stupid

00:46:35.060 even if you

00:46:35.760 don't like

00:46:36.140 how it is

00:46:36.480 now it

00:46:36.840 would be

00:46:37.000 stupid 0.75

00:46:37.400 and there's

00:46:39.780 no other

00:46:40.220 way to say

00:46:40.840 that

00:46:41.200 if you

00:46:42.980 can't

00:46:43.340 understand

00:46:43.820 what the

00:46:44.460 long-term

00:46:45.900 outcome

00:46:47.180 of that

00:46:47.560 is

00:46:47.920 you have

00:46:48.460 a problem

00:46:48.940 and it's

00:46:49.480 probably

00:46:49.740 IQ

00:46:50.140 by the

00:46:50.520 way

00:46:50.760 it's

00:46:51.820 probably

00:46:52.120 IQ

00:46:52.580 she

00:46:53.520 doesn't

00:46:54.060 seem

00:46:54.380 smart

00:46:54.920 now

00:46:56.300 before you

00:46:57.260 say to

00:46:57.600 me

00:46:57.900 but Scott

00:46:59.040 you're being

00:47:00.040 racist and

00:47:00.760 sexist by

00:47:01.400 calling Kamala

00:47:02.100 Harris not

00:47:02.660 smart

00:47:03.080 no

00:47:04.120 Obama

00:47:05.100 was brilliant

00:47:05.840 still is

00:47:07.140 brilliant

00:47:08.520 yeah

00:47:09.620 and Hillary 1.00

00:47:10.940 Hillary Clinton

00:47:12.420 very smart

00:47:14.320 did you

00:47:15.620 ever

00:47:15.820 did you

00:47:16.380 ever hear

00:47:16.800 me say

00:47:17.360 Hillary Clinton

00:47:18.420 is not

00:47:18.800 smart

00:47:19.220 no

00:47:19.620 no

00:47:20.480 no

00:47:21.140 what I

00:47:21.440 call

00:47:21.700 Harris

00:47:22.160 dumb

00:47:23.080 it's not

00:47:24.600 because she's a 0.99

00:47:25.240 woman has 1.00

00:47:25.760 nothing to do

00:47:26.360 with her

00:47:26.780 her racial

00:47:27.600 makeup

00:47:28.220 she just 0.65

00:47:29.820 actually does

00:47:30.500 seem dumb

00:47:30.960 that's my

00:47:32.200 actual impression

00:47:33.140 of her

00:47:33.460 and it's

00:47:36.320 always in the

00:47:36.760 same way

00:47:37.240 which is not

00:47:37.840 understanding the

00:47:38.580 ramifications

00:47:39.180 she would

00:47:40.240 like to

00:47:40.720 end fighting

00:47:41.440 in Gaza

00:47:42.040 well what

00:47:43.380 would that

00:47:43.720 lead to

00:47:44.200 rebuild

00:47:45.060 Gaza

00:47:45.640 rebuild

00:47:46.280 the

00:47:46.780 Hamas 0.96

00:47:47.560 Hamas 0.96

00:47:48.540 attacks

00:47:48.960 again

00:47:49.360 stronger

00:47:49.860 next

00:47:50.200 time

00:47:50.620 how about

00:47:52.520 chasing

00:47:53.140 equity

00:47:53.640 instead of

00:47:54.360 equality

00:47:55.260 of outcomes

00:47:55.920 well

00:47:56.880 you end up

00:47:57.980 with a

00:47:58.300 destroyed

00:47:58.720 economy

00:47:59.260 100%

00:48:00.320 total

00:48:02.100 inability

00:48:02.560 to understand

00:48:03.460 anything

00:48:03.820 about

00:48:04.240 the outcomes

00:48:05.280 of current

00:48:05.920 actions

00:48:06.380 what's

00:48:10.580 this

00:48:10.840 is there

00:48:15.440 really a

00:48:16.100 white dudes

00:48:16.900 for Kamala

00:48:17.600 Harris

00:48:18.040 event coming

00:48:19.340 up

00:48:19.640 is that

00:48:20.460 really a

00:48:20.840 thing

00:48:21.040 I'm seeing

00:48:22.500 it in the

00:48:22.860 comments

00:48:23.240 I don't

00:48:23.540 know if

00:48:23.760 that's

00:48:23.960 real

00:48:24.180 anyway

00:48:27.120 have you

00:48:27.640 heard of

00:48:27.940 a entity

00:48:28.500 called

00:48:28.840 NewsGuard

00:48:29.580 so NewsGuard

00:48:31.120 is this

00:48:31.840 fact-checking

00:48:32.920 group

00:48:33.340 I think

00:48:33.980 they're

00:48:34.280 international

00:48:34.980 and their

00:48:36.420 job is

00:48:37.080 to rate

00:48:37.880 various

00:48:38.980 news

00:48:39.620 entities

00:48:40.040 as to

00:48:41.500 whether

00:48:41.780 they're

00:48:42.280 credible

00:48:42.980 or a

00:48:43.740 bunch

00:48:43.900 of big

00:48:44.180 old

00:48:44.360 liars

00:48:44.800 now

00:48:45.760 you don't

00:48:46.520 have to

00:48:46.820 be alive

00:48:47.280 in the

00:48:47.520 world

00:48:47.680 for very

00:48:48.080 long

00:48:48.420 to know

00:48:48.900 that

00:48:49.060 NewsGuard

00:48:49.640 is not

00:48:50.700 a

00:48:51.000 legitimate

00:48:51.560 organization

00:48:53.100 it is

00:48:54.260 designed

00:48:54.740 to

00:48:55.260 shut down

00:48:56.480 conservatives

00:48:57.020 and

00:48:58.700 not

00:48:59.340 liberals

00:48:59.960 how do

00:49:00.980 I know

00:49:01.260 that

00:49:01.540 well they

00:49:02.000 just came

00:49:02.420 after

00:49:02.740 Jonathan

00:49:03.380 Turley

00:49:03.800 because

00:49:04.720 he wrote

00:49:05.260 an article

00:49:05.820 criticizing

00:49:06.540 NewsGuard

00:49:07.120 so he

00:49:08.320 criticized

00:49:08.720 them

00:49:09.160 and then

00:49:09.500 immediately

00:49:10.000 they sent

00:49:10.800 their

00:49:10.960 investigators

00:49:11.620 in

00:49:11.980 to find

00:49:12.760 out

00:49:12.980 if

00:49:13.160 Turley

00:49:13.520 was the

00:49:14.520 kind of

00:49:14.860 news

00:49:15.120 that you

00:49:15.420 should not

00:49:15.780 pay attention

00:49:16.280 to

00:49:16.580 guess what

00:49:17.320 they said

00:49:17.820 well I'm

00:49:19.460 not sure

00:49:19.760 if they

00:49:19.980 have a

00:49:20.340 rating yet

00:49:21.500 but obviously

00:49:22.160 they're going

00:49:22.580 to say

00:49:22.920 he's part

00:49:23.900 of the

00:49:24.180 bad

00:49:24.660 people

00:49:25.680 will they

00:49:26.320 have any

00:49:26.660 examples

00:49:27.060 to prove

00:49:27.620 it

00:49:27.740 of course

00:49:28.120 not

00:49:28.400 because he

00:49:28.960 doesn't

00:49:29.240 have any

00:49:29.560 bad

00:49:29.820 examples

00:49:30.300 ever

00:49:30.840 Turley

00:49:31.940 is one

00:49:32.580 of the

00:49:32.820 cleanest

00:49:33.600 thinkers

00:49:34.120 and least

00:49:35.580 biased

00:49:35.940 people

00:49:36.260 you'll

00:49:36.520 ever

00:49:36.680 see

00:49:36.980 and

00:49:38.220 but they

00:49:39.520 went after

00:49:39.960 him

00:49:40.380 because he

00:49:41.200 was being

00:49:42.640 objectively

00:49:43.360 candid about

00:49:44.760 them

00:49:45.120 so now

00:49:46.200 he's on

00:49:46.740 the attack

00:49:47.200 but

00:49:47.960 so you

00:49:49.500 should know

00:49:49.860 that they

00:49:50.180 go after

00:49:50.640 things like

00:49:51.500 well every

00:49:52.900 conservative

00:49:53.360 site

00:49:53.720 but they

00:49:54.540 would not

00:49:54.860 go after

00:49:55.220 say the

00:49:55.700 Huffington

00:49:56.020 Post or

00:49:56.640 the New

00:49:56.960 Republic

00:49:57.400 which are

00:49:59.540 ridiculous

00:50:00.600 outlets

00:50:01.300 well I

00:50:02.380 don't know

00:50:02.680 too much

00:50:03.060 about the

00:50:03.380 New

00:50:03.520 Republic

00:50:03.940 but Huffington

00:50:05.040 Post is

00:50:06.240 an absurdly

00:50:07.220 fake news

00:50:07.960 site

00:50:08.360 but they're

00:50:09.520 fine

00:50:09.880 so in case

00:50:11.400 you wondered

00:50:11.920 Scott are you

00:50:12.900 exaggerating

00:50:13.660 about them

00:50:14.160 really only

00:50:14.760 existing to

00:50:15.500 shut down

00:50:15.980 conservative

00:50:16.560 sites

00:50:17.040 they don't

00:50:19.180 give the

00:50:19.500 Huffington

00:50:19.960 Post a

00:50:20.620 bad grade

00:50:21.340 that's all

00:50:22.460 you need

00:50:22.820 to know

00:50:23.240 right I

00:50:24.680 mean that

00:50:25.120 that should

00:50:25.520 tell you

00:50:26.000 100% of

00:50:26.960 everything you

00:50:27.460 need to

00:50:27.760 know

00:50:27.960 right

00:50:28.820 so they

00:50:30.440 are in

00:50:31.980 my opinion

00:50:32.600 a illegitimate

00:50:34.000 fake site

00:50:34.980 that are

00:50:35.640 determining

00:50:36.140 what you

00:50:37.200 can and

00:50:37.620 cannot see

00:50:38.140 on every

00:50:38.860 platform

00:50:39.580 and every

00:50:40.200 news

00:50:40.760 they are

00:50:42.860 a part of

00:50:43.480 the suppression

00:50:44.200 anti-American

00:50:46.120 operation

00:50:47.820 well this is

00:50:51.480 kind of

00:50:51.760 interesting

00:50:52.060 you may have

00:50:52.620 seen that

00:50:53.000 there was a

00:50:53.500 deep fake

00:50:54.220 of Kamala

00:50:54.840 Harris giving

00:50:55.460 a speech

00:50:56.000 it wasn't

00:50:56.980 really her

00:50:57.480 but it

00:50:58.120 showed the

00:50:58.880 deep fake

00:50:59.320 technology

00:50:59.980 way better

00:51:00.780 than you

00:51:01.100 thought it

00:51:01.440 was

00:51:01.740 and by

00:51:02.660 you I

00:51:03.160 mean me

00:51:03.580 way better

00:51:04.480 than I

00:51:04.820 thought it

00:51:05.120 was

00:51:05.340 I did

00:51:06.200 think that

00:51:06.820 by now

00:51:07.820 there were

00:51:08.120 probably some

00:51:08.780 military

00:51:09.700 applications

00:51:10.840 that could 0.68

00:51:11.920 do a

00:51:12.220 deep fake

00:51:12.660 perfectly

00:51:13.160 but I

00:51:14.200 didn't think

00:51:14.560 you could

00:51:14.820 do it

00:51:15.060 just with

00:51:15.800 an app

00:51:16.240 that you

00:51:16.500 downloaded

00:51:16.960 but it

00:51:18.280 looks like

00:51:18.540 you can

00:51:18.920 because I

00:51:19.880 don't know

00:51:20.160 how they

00:51:20.580 made it

00:51:20.920 but they

00:51:21.280 did make

00:51:21.820 a deep

00:51:22.220 fake

00:51:22.480 that

00:51:22.780 talked

00:51:23.200 naturally

00:51:23.940 and I

00:51:25.700 don't think

00:51:26.160 you would

00:51:26.420 have

00:51:26.520 necessarily

00:51:27.000 identified

00:51:27.800 it as a

00:51:28.360 fake

00:51:28.640 usually you

00:51:29.600 can but

00:51:31.120 it's reached

00:51:31.580 a new

00:51:31.880 level

00:51:32.180 anyway

00:51:33.000 what's

00:51:33.380 interesting

00:51:33.740 about this

00:51:34.260 is not

00:51:34.600 just that

00:51:35.000 the technology

00:51:35.860 reached the

00:51:36.400 point where

00:51:36.820 you really

00:51:37.260 can't tell

00:51:37.740 the difference

00:51:38.280 but that

00:51:39.420 Elon posted

00:51:40.360 it and

00:51:41.860 he posted

00:51:42.460 it without

00:51:42.920 a parody

00:51:43.500 warning

00:51:43.940 now some

00:51:46.400 people said

00:51:46.900 wait a

00:51:47.460 minute

00:51:47.700 X's own

00:51:48.700 rules are

00:51:49.580 that if

00:51:49.940 you do

00:51:50.260 a deep

00:51:50.600 fake

00:51:50.920 you've

00:51:51.680 got to

00:51:51.920 put a

00:51:52.180 parody

00:51:52.480 warning

00:51:52.840 on it

00:51:53.300 but other

00:51:55.080 people said

00:51:55.760 maybe this

00:51:56.740 is just

00:51:57.080 a fair

00:51:57.440 fight

00:51:57.860 because

00:51:59.260 100%

00:52:00.180 of everything

00:52:00.720 the Harris

00:52:01.120 campaign

00:52:01.560 has said

00:52:02.000 has been

00:52:02.440 fake

00:52:02.860 100%

00:52:04.820 everything

00:52:06.120 everything

00:52:07.060 they've said

00:52:07.520 has been

00:52:07.780 a lie

00:52:08.120 is it

00:52:10.100 immoral

00:52:11.320 or unethical

00:52:12.160 if you

00:52:13.440 met their

00:52:13.920 100%

00:52:14.580 lying

00:52:14.980 with

00:52:15.260 100%

00:52:15.960 lies

00:52:16.380 I

00:52:19.640 don't

00:52:19.780 have an

00:52:20.040 answer

00:52:20.260 to that

00:52:20.660 I

00:52:21.560 just

00:52:21.760 know

00:52:21.900 it's

00:52:22.040 really

00:52:22.260 interesting

00:52:22.680 that

00:52:23.080 Elon

00:52:23.420 did

00:52:24.380 something

00:52:24.720 that

00:52:25.000 appears

00:52:25.520 to be

00:52:25.820 a

00:52:25.940 violation

00:52:26.320 of

00:52:26.560 his

00:52:26.700 own

00:52:26.900 terms

00:52:27.320 doing

00:52:28.120 a

00:52:28.360 fake

00:52:28.720 video

00:52:29.080 that

00:52:29.320 isn't

00:52:29.640 labeled

00:52:29.940 as

00:52:30.220 a

00:52:30.380 parody

00:52:30.660 but

00:52:31.960 he

00:52:32.160 may

00:52:32.400 have

00:52:32.520 been

00:52:32.680 doing

00:52:32.880 it

00:52:33.040 for

00:52:33.200 exactly

00:52:33.640 that

00:52:33.920 reason

00:52:34.280 we

00:52:34.580 don't

00:52:34.740 know

00:52:34.920 his

00:52:35.080 reasons

00:52:35.460 but

00:52:36.220 you

00:52:36.660 assume

00:52:37.200 he

00:52:37.380 thinks

00:52:37.680 things

00:52:37.960 through

00:52:38.200 he's

00:52:38.440 not

00:52:38.660 randomly

00:52:39.760 throwing

00:52:40.320 things

00:52:40.660 up

00:52:40.900 and

00:52:41.100 seeing

00:52:41.460 what

00:52:41.620 happens

00:52:41.960 it

00:52:43.360 could

00:52:43.600 be

00:52:43.940 it

00:52:45.160 could

00:52:45.420 be

00:52:45.640 that

00:52:45.880 this

00:52:46.160 is

00:52:46.440 a

00:52:46.640 statement

00:52:46.960 we

00:52:47.880 don't

00:52:48.080 know

00:52:48.360 but

00:52:49.320 it's

00:52:49.500 an

00:52:49.640 interesting

00:52:49.980 event

00:52:50.760 here's

00:52:51.740 what

00:52:51.980 Balaji

00:52:52.720 Srinivasan

00:52:53.560 said

00:52:54.020 says

00:52:54.480 about

00:52:54.700 this

00:52:54.920 situation

00:52:55.440 he

00:52:57.100 says

00:52:57.300 it's

00:52:57.480 the

00:52:57.660 first

00:52:57.940 fair

00:52:58.300 fight

00:52:58.760 he

00:53:00.120 says

00:53:00.580 do you

00:53:00.780 remember

00:53:00.980 the

00:53:01.200 emerald

00:53:01.560 mines

00:53:02.120 fake

00:53:03.620 story

00:53:04.040 about

00:53:04.460 Elon

00:53:04.980 or

00:53:05.580 the

00:53:05.780 p-tape

00:53:06.420 about

00:53:06.940 Trump

00:53:09.400 or

00:53:09.940 I can

00:53:10.440 see

00:53:10.600 Russia

00:53:10.900 from

00:53:11.080 my

00:53:11.240 house

00:53:11.620 or

00:53:11.900 the

00:53:12.500 couch

00:53:12.900 you

00:53:13.620 know

00:53:13.740 the

00:53:13.860 J.D.

00:53:14.240 Vince

00:53:14.540 couch

00:53:14.980 story

00:53:15.380 he

00:53:16.180 says

00:53:16.400 for

00:53:16.560 literally

00:53:16.900 generations

00:53:17.520 Democrats

00:53:18.140 have

00:53:18.380 controlled

00:53:18.800 institutions

00:53:19.460 like

00:53:19.820 Hollywood

00:53:20.260 and

00:53:20.520 the

00:53:20.660 news

00:53:21.000 and

00:53:21.900 they

00:53:22.080 could

00:53:22.260 basically

00:53:22.920 tell you

00:53:24.280 any

00:53:24.620 fake

00:53:24.960 story

00:53:25.300 they

00:53:25.480 wanted

00:53:25.780 like

00:53:26.060 it

00:53:26.200 was

00:53:26.340 true

00:53:26.580 and

00:53:26.740 nobody

00:53:26.980 could

00:53:27.180 tell

00:53:27.340 the

00:53:27.520 difference

00:53:27.920 because

00:53:28.180 they

00:53:28.320 had

00:53:28.460 such

00:53:28.780 complete

00:53:29.720 control

00:53:30.160 over

00:53:30.380 the

00:53:30.540 media

00:53:30.800 but

00:53:31.880 now

00:53:32.520 because

00:53:32.940 of

00:53:33.180 X

00:53:33.640 and

00:53:34.800 the

00:53:35.480 birth

00:53:35.840 of

00:53:36.240 consumer

00:53:37.260 level

00:53:37.820 professional

00:53:38.980 memes

00:53:39.500 meaning

00:53:40.460 that

00:53:40.800 one

00:53:41.120 person

00:53:41.500 can

00:53:41.800 sit

00:53:41.960 in

00:53:42.120 their

00:53:42.280 living

00:53:42.500 room

00:53:42.720 and

00:53:42.880 make

00:53:43.060 something

00:53:43.340 that

00:53:43.540 looks

00:53:43.800 as

00:53:44.380 good

00:53:44.600 as

00:53:44.760 Hollywood

00:53:45.080 could

00:53:45.380 have

00:53:45.480 made

00:53:45.600 a

00:53:45.720 few

00:53:45.840 years

00:53:46.080 ago

00:53:46.320 then

00:53:47.620 it's

00:53:48.500 a

00:53:48.620 fair

00:53:48.780 fight

00:53:49.220 and

00:53:50.560 maybe

00:53:51.020 both

00:53:52.620 sides

00:53:53.000 will

00:53:53.220 go to

00:53:53.660 100%

00:53:54.500 fake

00:53:54.960 everything

00:53:55.460 because

00:53:57.040 real news

00:53:57.800 doesn't

00:53:58.100 seem to

00:53:58.460 move

00:53:58.680 the

00:53:58.980 needle

00:53:59.920 too much

00:54:00.480 but

00:54:01.020 the

00:54:01.200 fake

00:54:01.460 news

00:54:01.880 because

00:54:03.320 it's

00:54:03.600 always

00:54:03.780 more

00:54:04.060 provocative

00:54:04.580 does

00:54:06.380 so

00:54:07.880 so

00:54:07.900 what

00:54:08.180 would

00:54:08.360 happen

00:54:08.660 if

00:54:08.900 both

00:54:09.160 the

00:54:09.340 left

00:54:09.560 and

00:54:09.720 the

00:54:09.840 right

00:54:10.000 said

00:54:10.240 you

00:54:10.380 know

00:54:10.500 what

00:54:10.780 let's

00:54:11.300 just

00:54:11.480 not

00:54:11.760 even

00:54:11.960 try

00:54:12.200 to

00:54:12.340 do

00:54:12.480 the

00:54:12.640 real

00:54:12.820 stuff

00:54:13.140 anymore

00:54:13.500 let's

00:54:14.280 just

00:54:14.460 go

00:54:14.660 full

00:54:14.940 fake

00:54:15.340 now

00:54:16.380 you

00:54:16.520 say

00:54:16.680 to

00:54:16.780 me

00:54:17.000 Scott

00:54:17.440 that's

00:54:17.780 like

00:54:18.040 that's

00:54:19.320 kind

00:54:19.560 of

00:54:19.720 irresponsible

00:54:20.480 and

00:54:20.760 crazy

00:54:21.120 is

00:54:21.980 it

00:54:22.180 100%

00:54:23.900 of

00:54:24.380 what

00:54:24.560 the

00:54:24.720 Harris

00:54:25.000 campaign

00:54:25.740 and

00:54:25.960 Biden

00:54:26.220 before

00:54:26.540 him

00:54:26.760 are

00:54:27.020 saying

00:54:27.340 is

00:54:27.580 fake

00:54:27.980 100%

00:54:29.400 all

00:54:29.920 of

00:54:30.040 it

00:54:30.140 every

00:54:30.380 single

00:54:30.980 claim

00:54:31.380 it's

00:54:32.080 all

00:54:32.240 fake

00:54:32.540 everything

00:54:33.320 they

00:54:33.580 say

00:54:33.780 about

00:54:33.960 the

00:54:34.140 record

00:54:34.460 everything

00:54:34.820 they

00:54:35.060 say

00:54:35.200 about

00:54:35.400 Trump

00:54:35.660 100%

00:54:36.840 lies

00:54:37.260 now

00:54:38.420 if

00:54:38.820 you

00:54:38.940 don't

00:54:39.100 think

00:54:39.400 so

00:54:39.740 bring

00:54:41.380 me

00:54:41.560 something

00:54:41.840 that

00:54:42.100 isn't

00:54:42.820 see

00:54:44.140 if

00:54:44.700 you

00:54:44.780 can

00:54:44.920 find

00:54:45.220 one

00:54:45.540 if

00:54:46.200 you

00:54:46.320 find

00:54:46.600 one

00:54:46.820 it'll

00:54:47.020 be

00:54:47.140 so

00:54:47.360 trivial

00:54:47.820 I'll

00:54:48.320 say

00:54:48.480 well

00:54:48.800 okay

00:54:49.340 but

00:54:50.220 that's

00:54:50.660 sort

00:54:51.140 of

00:54:51.280 trivial

00:54:51.620 right

00:54:52.820 no

00:54:53.520 we're

00:54:54.020 already

00:54:54.360 in

00:54:54.560 100%

00:54:55.120 lie

00:54:55.400 territory

00:54:55.920 and

00:54:56.700 I

00:54:56.820 think

00:54:56.980 the

00:54:57.180 conservatives

00:54:57.720 you know

00:54:59.360 maybe

00:54:59.560 are a

00:54:59.800 little

00:54:59.900 behind

00:55:00.300 in

00:55:00.520 the

00:55:00.640 lying

00:55:00.980 but

00:55:01.360 what

00:55:01.520 happens

00:55:01.820 if

00:55:02.000 they

00:55:02.120 decided

00:55:02.460 to

00:55:02.640 catch

00:55:02.860 up

00:55:03.120 what

00:55:04.060 if

00:55:04.180 they

00:55:04.320 said

00:55:04.540 you

00:55:04.680 know

00:55:04.780 what

00:55:04.920 there's

00:55:05.120 nothing

00:55:05.380 coming

00:55:05.640 from

00:55:05.800 the

00:55:05.940 left

00:55:06.120 that's

00:55:06.360 true

00:55:06.560 we'll

00:55:06.800 just

00:55:07.000 do

00:55:07.180 that

00:55:07.480 I

00:55:09.680 don't

00:55:09.800 know

00:55:10.020 I'm

00:55:11.160 not

00:55:11.320 recommending

00:55:11.880 it

00:55:12.220 I'm

00:55:13.300 just

00:55:13.440 saying

00:55:13.700 it's

00:55:13.900 interesting

00:55:14.260 what

00:55:15.500 I

00:55:15.620 do

00:55:15.760 think

00:55:16.080 is

00:55:16.400 that

00:55:16.620 we

00:55:16.760 should

00:55:16.940 have

00:55:17.120 more

00:55:17.380 of

00:55:17.600 the

00:55:17.880 brainwashing

00:55:19.300 tests

00:55:20.180 somebody

00:55:21.440 asked

00:55:21.760 me

00:55:21.940 Scott

00:55:22.380 you

00:55:23.160 have

00:55:23.340 that

00:55:23.520 clever

00:55:23.820 little

00:55:24.140 three

00:55:24.420 question

00:55:24.800 test

00:55:25.140 to

00:55:25.340 find

00:55:25.520 out

00:55:25.720 if

00:55:25.940 Democrats

00:55:26.440 are

00:55:31.360 yes

00:55:31.980 I

00:55:32.160 could

00:55:32.400 and

00:55:32.560 I'm

00:55:32.700 not

00:55:32.860 going

00:55:33.080 to

00:55:33.320 do

00:55:34.940 you

00:55:34.980 know

00:55:35.120 why

00:55:35.420 because

00:55:36.480 I

00:55:36.620 want

00:55:36.800 Trump

00:55:37.040 to

00:55:37.200 win

00:55:37.380 and

00:55:38.640 I

00:55:38.760 don't

00:55:38.900 want

00:55:39.040 to

00:55:39.160 start

00:55:39.360 a

00:55:39.500 fight

00:55:39.700 with

00:55:39.880 the

00:55:40.200 right

00:55:40.420 so

00:55:41.820 I'm

00:55:42.500 not

00:55:42.760 going

00:55:42.900 to

00:55:43.120 give

00:55:44.160 you

00:55:44.320 balance

00:55:44.640 on

00:55:44.980 that

00:55:45.260 I

00:55:46.380 could

00:55:46.720 I

00:55:47.640 could

00:55:47.800 tell

00:55:48.000 you

00:55:48.280 some

00:55:48.680 things

00:55:48.960 that

00:55:49.120 look

00:55:49.260 like

00:55:49.460 brainwashing

00:55:50.060 to

00:55:50.220 me

00:55:50.440 but

00:55:51.100 I

00:55:51.240 don't

00:55:51.380 think

00:55:51.560 they're

00:55:51.740 especially

00:55:52.120 important

00:55:52.620 frankly

00:55:53.060 in

00:55:54.020 other

00:55:54.220 words

00:55:54.540 it

00:55:55.640 may

00:55:55.800 be

00:55:55.940 brainwashing

00:55:56.620 that

00:55:56.800 you

00:55:56.920 gave

00:56:01.360 but

00:56:01.760 everybody

00:56:02.260 has

00:56:02.500 some

00:56:02.860 ideas

00:56:03.340 that

00:56:03.720 are

00:56:03.860 clearly

00:56:04.300 not

00:56:04.620 true

00:56:04.960 including

00:56:05.740 me

00:56:06.000 of

00:56:06.180 course

00:56:06.460 I

00:56:06.620 just

00:56:06.800 don't

00:56:07.000 know

00:56:07.080 what

00:56:07.200 they

00:56:07.340 are

00:56:07.560 that

00:56:08.200 the

00:56:08.360 nature

00:56:08.600 of

00:56:08.780 brainwashing

00:56:09.320 is

00:56:09.520 the

00:56:09.680 only

00:56:09.860 person

00:56:10.160 who

00:56:10.320 can't

00:56:10.720 tell

00:56:11.020 is

00:56:12.060 the

00:56:12.200 brainwashed

00:56:12.680 person

00:56:13.060 so

00:56:14.000 it's

00:56:14.180 easier

00:56:14.480 to

00:56:14.680 observe

00:56:15.060 it

00:56:15.220 from

00:56:15.360 the

00:56:15.480 outside

00:56:15.780 and

00:56:15.900 say

00:56:16.000 oh

00:56:16.140 yeah

00:56:16.360 that's

00:56:17.120 obviously

00:56:17.520 brainwashing

00:56:18.200 but

00:56:18.760 the

00:56:18.920 thing

00:56:19.080 you

00:56:19.180 have

00:56:19.300 to

00:56:19.380 be

00:56:19.520 careful

00:56:19.800 of

00:56:20.140 is

00:56:21.020 if

00:56:21.180 someone

00:56:21.420 else

00:56:21.700 can

00:56:21.880 do

00:56:22.020 that

00:56:22.220 to

00:56:22.360 you

00:56:22.600 they

00:56:23.520 can

00:56:23.660 look

00:56:23.820 at

00:56:23.940 you

00:56:24.120 and

00:56:24.260 say

00:56:24.460 yeah

00:56:25.320 but

00:56:26.160 you

00:56:26.300 know

00:56:26.440 that

00:56:26.680 thing

00:56:26.880 you

00:56:27.120 believe

00:56:27.640 that's

00:56:28.900 obviously

00:56:29.340 a little

00:56:29.740 brainwashing

00:56:30.460 too

00:56:30.720 and you

00:56:31.180 wouldn't

00:56:31.340 be able

00:56:31.540 to see

00:56:31.780 it

00:56:31.920 you'd

00:56:32.140 say

00:56:32.240 no

00:56:32.480 I

00:56:32.720 used

00:56:33.400 my

00:56:33.600 judgment

00:56:33.940 I

00:56:34.580 did

00:56:34.740 a deep

00:56:35.020 dive

00:56:35.300 I

00:56:35.460 looked

00:56:35.680 into

00:56:35.880 it

00:56:36.000 myself

00:56:36.380 sometimes

00:56:37.740 that

00:56:38.060 would

00:56:38.160 be

00:56:38.300 true

00:56:38.540 well

00:56:40.640 there's

00:56:41.120 a new

00:56:41.400 drunk

00:56:41.820 Kamala

00:56:42.300 video

00:56:42.700 according

00:56:43.120 to me

00:56:43.580 and

00:56:45.300 you

00:56:45.500 may

00:56:45.780 have

00:56:45.900 seen

00:56:46.120 it

00:56:46.360 and

00:56:46.660 the

00:56:47.100 way

00:56:47.360 it's

00:56:47.460 being

00:56:47.620 presented

00:56:48.020 is

00:56:48.300 just

00:56:52.360 she

00:56:52.560 doesn't

00:56:52.820 answer

00:56:53.020 the

00:56:53.180 question

00:56:53.560 and

00:56:53.820 she

00:56:54.120 just

00:56:54.320 says

00:56:54.520 generic

00:56:54.900 things

00:56:55.300 but

00:56:56.180 take

00:56:57.100 a look

00:56:57.400 at her

00:56:57.760 with

00:56:59.120 the

00:56:59.580 idea

00:57:00.500 in mind

00:57:01.060 that

00:57:01.440 she's

00:57:01.720 not

00:57:01.920 just

00:57:02.160 bad

00:57:02.460 at

00:57:02.600 answering

00:57:02.900 a

00:57:03.100 question

00:57:03.440 but

00:57:04.400 that

00:57:04.640 she's

00:57:04.960 literally

00:57:05.360 drunk

00:57:05.840 and

00:57:06.860 then

00:57:07.000 see

00:57:07.180 if

00:57:07.300 it

00:57:07.400 doesn't

00:57:07.640 look

00:57:07.800 like

00:57:08.020 it

00:57:08.160 to

00:57:08.280 you

00:57:08.500 and

00:57:09.560 if

00:57:09.740 that

00:57:10.260 doesn't

00:57:10.580 work

00:57:10.780 for

00:57:11.020 you

00:57:11.260 I

00:57:12.000 also

00:57:12.240 reposted

00:57:13.000 this

00:57:13.240 morning

00:57:13.680 Breitbart

00:57:14.220 News

00:57:14.540 had

00:57:14.780 a

00:57:15.100 little

00:57:16.220 four

00:57:16.620 pack

00:57:16.980 of

00:57:17.180 four

00:57:17.380 little

00:57:17.640 videos

00:57:18.240 on

00:57:18.740 X

00:57:19.060 that

00:57:22.360 Kamala

00:57:22.780 is

00:57:23.020 doing

00:57:23.220 the

00:57:23.380 word

00:57:23.580 salad

00:57:23.900 thing

00:57:24.220 I

00:57:25.380 don't

00:57:25.520 think

00:57:25.700 it's

00:57:25.820 word

00:57:26.020 salad

00:57:26.360 I

00:57:27.140 looked

00:57:27.400 at

00:57:27.500 all

00:57:27.660 four

00:57:27.900 of

00:57:28.040 them

00:57:28.160 and

00:57:28.280 all

00:57:28.540 four

00:57:28.740 of

00:57:28.860 them

00:57:28.980 looked

00:57:29.200 drunk

00:57:29.600 to

00:57:30.440 me

00:57:30.720 so

00:57:31.760 I

00:57:32.060 would

00:57:32.220 love

00:57:32.620 to

00:57:33.340 get

00:57:33.520 your

00:57:33.720 opinion

00:57:34.060 because

00:57:35.060 confirmation

00:57:35.940 bias

00:57:36.520 is

00:57:36.800 pretty

00:57:37.100 strong

00:57:37.480 so

00:57:38.380 once

00:57:38.980 I

00:57:39.160 convinced

00:57:39.560 myself

00:57:40.020 that's

00:57:40.300 what

00:57:40.440 I

00:57:40.540 was

00:57:40.680 seeing

00:57:40.960 it's

00:57:42.520 easy

00:57:42.820 to

00:57:43.060 imagine

00:57:43.420 that

00:57:43.740 then

00:57:44.060 I

00:57:44.260 had

00:57:44.940 confirmation

00:57:45.540 bias

00:57:45.960 and

00:57:46.140 I

00:57:46.260 could

00:57:46.380 see

00:57:46.580 it

00:57:46.700 even

00:57:46.880 if

00:57:47.100 it

00:57:47.220 isn't

00:57:52.360 and

00:57:53.900 the

00:57:54.080 tell

00:57:54.300 to

00:57:54.500 look

00:57:54.720 for

00:57:55.040 is

00:57:55.480 her

00:57:55.700 shoulders

00:57:56.360 all

00:57:58.180 right

00:57:58.360 so

00:57:59.020 I'm

00:57:59.160 going

00:57:59.260 to

00:57:59.320 do

00:57:59.440 an

00:57:59.580 impression

00:57:59.940 that

00:58:00.380 you

00:58:01.100 Spotify

00:58:01.540 listeners

00:58:02.180 won't

00:58:02.420 be

00:58:02.560 able

00:58:02.660 to

00:58:02.800 appreciate

00:58:03.200 but

00:58:04.100 when

00:58:04.980 she's

00:58:05.420 looking

00:58:06.760 like

00:58:07.140 she's

00:58:07.360 not

00:58:07.600 inebriated

00:58:08.220 to

00:58:08.460 me

00:58:08.760 when

00:58:09.980 she

00:58:10.200 talks

00:58:10.700 her

00:58:11.040 body

00:58:11.360 is

00:58:11.580 calm

00:58:11.960 and

00:58:12.960 she

00:58:13.180 says

00:58:13.520 what

00:58:13.680 she

00:58:13.820 wants

00:58:14.020 to

00:58:14.160 say

00:58:14.300 maybe

00:58:14.600 maybe

00:58:14.920 her

00:58:15.060 hands

00:58:15.320 are

00:58:15.460 moving

00:58:15.720 because

00:58:15.980 people

00:58:16.260 move

00:58:16.500 their

00:58:16.660 hands

00:58:16.900 but

00:58:18.380 there's

00:58:18.600 nothing

00:58:18.820 about

00:58:19.040 her

00:58:19.140 body

00:58:19.380 that

00:58:19.540 looks

00:58:19.680 unusual

00:58:20.080 when

00:58:21.180 she

00:58:21.380 looks

00:58:21.680 drunk

00:58:22.040 to

00:58:22.240 me

00:58:22.500 I

00:58:23.200 see

00:58:23.520 her

00:58:23.720 shoulders

00:58:24.220 moving

00:58:24.720 when

00:58:25.220 she

00:58:25.360 talks

00:58:25.780 and

00:58:26.280 I'll

00:58:26.380 give

00:58:26.520 you

00:58:26.640 an

00:58:26.760 impression

00:58:27.140 of

00:58:27.400 it

00:58:27.560 just

00:58:27.900 so

00:58:28.040 you

00:58:28.120 can

00:58:28.220 look

00:58:28.360 for

00:58:28.540 it

00:58:28.700 it's

00:58:28.860 more

00:58:29.000 like

00:58:29.220 this

00:58:29.980 you'll

00:58:32.120 see

00:58:32.400 it's

00:58:32.800 like

00:58:32.960 the

00:58:33.100 body

00:58:33.420 is

00:58:33.700 contorting

00:58:34.360 it's

00:58:35.120 like

00:58:35.280 she's

00:58:35.540 searching

00:58:35.840 for

00:58:36.140 words

00:58:36.560 and

00:58:37.440 the

00:58:37.580 body

00:58:37.820 is

00:58:37.960 trying

00:58:38.140 to

00:58:38.300 help

00:58:38.580 to

00:58:39.580 me

00:58:39.780 that

00:58:40.020 looks

00:58:40.260 drunk

00:58:40.640 right

00:58:42.000 I

00:58:42.660 could

00:58:43.020 be

00:58:43.360 wrong

00:58:43.820 but

00:58:45.480 I

00:58:45.600 want

00:58:45.800 you

00:58:45.900 to

00:58:46.000 look

00:58:46.160 for

00:58:46.400 it

00:58:46.580 because

00:58:46.840 it

00:58:47.500 looks

00:58:47.700 kind

00:58:47.940 of

00:58:48.060 obvious

00:58:48.400 to

00:58:48.600 me

00:58:48.760 actually

00:58:49.280 bank

00:58:53.560 more

00:58:53.780 encores

00:58:54.400 when you

00:58:54.760 switch

00:58:55.020 to a

00:58:55.360 Scotiabank

00:58:55.920 banking

00:58:56.280 package

00:58:56.780 learn

00:58:58.060 more

00:58:58.320 at

00:58:58.480 scotiabank.com

00:58:59.520 slash

00:58:59.900 banking

00:59:00.260 packages

00:59:00.780 conditions

00:59:01.500 apply

00:59:01.960 Scotiabank

00:59:03.620 you're

00:59:04.040 richer

00:59:04.240 than you

00:59:04.560 think

00:59:04.860 well

00:59:07.000 Janet Yellen

00:59:07.760 has given

00:59:09.180 a speech

00:59:09.680 in Brazil

00:59:10.160 and she

00:59:10.820 said

00:59:11.120 that

00:59:11.440 the

00:59:12.280 cost

00:59:12.680 to

00:59:12.880 transition

00:59:13.400 to

00:59:13.700 the

00:59:13.900 low

00:59:14.180 carbon

00:59:14.480 economy

00:59:15.000 and save

00:59:15.620 the world

00:59:15.980 from

00:59:16.220 climate

00:59:16.540 change

00:59:17.000 would

00:59:18.000 be

00:59:18.340 many

00:59:19.060 trillions

00:59:19.520 of dollars

00:59:20.120 and maybe

00:59:20.900 we would

00:59:21.340 take

00:59:21.520 three

00:59:21.820 trillion

00:59:22.180 globally

00:59:22.880 and

00:59:24.640 it's a

00:59:25.720 top

00:59:25.920 priority

00:59:26.340 for the

00:59:26.740 Biden

00:59:27.040 administration

00:59:27.720 and said

00:59:29.320 that

00:59:29.880 Yellen

00:59:30.940 vowed

00:59:31.320 to

00:59:31.460 finance

00:59:31.920 green

00:59:32.240 initiatives

00:59:32.760 and

00:59:33.100 developing

00:59:33.540 countries

00:59:34.140 through

00:59:34.880 multilateral

00:59:35.660 development

00:59:36.260 banks

00:59:36.660 and blah

00:59:37.080 blah

00:59:37.200 blah

00:59:37.460 to

00:59:38.440 which

00:59:38.640 I

00:59:38.800 say

00:59:39.180 all

00:59:41.720 right

00:59:41.940 let me

00:59:42.460 understand

00:59:42.880 this

00:59:43.240 if you

00:59:44.220 were to

00:59:44.480 take

00:59:44.700 all the

00:59:45.180 already

00:59:45.760 developed

00:59:46.340 countries

00:59:46.980 and I

00:59:48.240 would

00:59:48.620 add

00:59:48.940 I don't

00:59:49.540 know what

00:59:49.820 the

00:59:49.940 current

00:59:50.240 definition

00:59:50.700 is

00:59:50.980 but

00:59:51.220 in my

00:59:52.080 view

00:59:52.380 India

00:59:52.820 and China

00:59:53.320 are

00:59:53.540 developed

00:59:54.080 countries

00:59:54.720 does that

00:59:55.560 does that

00:59:56.580 match your

00:59:57.180 understanding

00:59:58.020 and Europe

00:59:59.940 of course

01:00:00.580 and then

01:00:01.960 you know

01:00:02.340 I suppose

01:00:02.780 Brazil

01:00:03.420 and you

01:00:04.400 know

01:00:04.520 maybe

01:00:04.800 Argentina

01:00:05.460 is coming

01:00:05.940 online

01:00:06.400 and stuff

01:00:06.820 so let's

01:00:07.740 suppose you

01:00:08.580 took all

01:00:09.060 the developed

01:00:09.700 countries

01:00:10.260 and you

01:00:12.020 took them

01:00:12.500 out of the

01:00:13.040 calculation

01:00:13.680 for climate

01:00:14.340 change

01:00:14.800 wouldn't

01:00:16.280 that be

01:00:16.600 90%

01:00:17.200 of all

01:00:17.500 the

01:00:17.600 climate

01:00:17.860 change

01:00:18.240 how much

01:00:20.000 how much

01:00:20.500 climate

01:00:20.880 change

01:00:21.280 problems

01:00:21.640 do we

01:00:21.900 have

01:00:22.060 from quote

01:00:22.540 developing

01:00:23.080 countries

01:00:23.640 or is she

01:00:25.120 calling China 0.84

01:00:25.720 a developing

01:00:26.220 country

01:00:26.640 we're not

01:00:27.000 going to invest

01:00:27.480 in China

01:00:28.000 are we

01:00:28.780 and does

01:00:31.400 India need 0.73

01:00:32.120 our outside

01:00:32.800 investment

01:00:33.340 I don't

01:00:34.480 think so

01:00:35.020 I think

01:00:36.140 they're doing

01:00:36.500 okay

01:00:36.860 so

01:00:38.220 what part

01:00:39.840 of this

01:00:40.140 isn't

01:00:40.460 stupid 0.75

01:00:40.840 why would

01:00:42.160 we

01:00:42.600 put lots

01:00:43.880 of financial

01:00:44.480 resources

01:00:45.100 behind

01:00:45.640 developing

01:00:46.900 countries

01:00:47.400 when they

01:00:47.920 can't be

01:00:48.340 more than

01:00:48.660 10%

01:00:49.160 of the

01:00:49.400 problem

01:00:49.760 and if

01:00:50.760 the big

01:00:51.120 countries

01:00:51.520 found a

01:00:51.980 way to

01:00:52.300 solve

01:00:52.580 their

01:00:52.800 problem

01:00:53.240 then they

01:00:55.120 would buy

01:00:55.820 that technology

01:00:56.700 until the

01:00:58.060 cost per unit

01:00:58.880 of that

01:00:59.200 technology

01:00:59.740 was affordable

01:01:00.580 for a

01:01:02.460 developing

01:01:02.800 country

01:01:03.260 so I

01:01:05.480 feel like

01:01:05.860 the most

01:01:06.300 self-solving

01:01:08.160 problem in

01:01:09.120 the entire

01:01:09.660 world

01:01:10.160 like the

01:01:11.160 one that

01:01:11.460 you should

01:01:11.720 put no

01:01:12.100 attention

01:01:12.520 in

01:01:12.820 just

01:01:14.060 just do

01:01:15.740 what you

01:01:16.040 can do

01:01:16.340 for developing

01:01:17.100 countries

01:01:17.720 and then

01:01:18.720 the non-developed

01:01:19.880 countries that

01:01:20.440 were never

01:01:20.780 a problem

01:01:21.280 anyway

01:01:21.680 they get

01:01:23.700 they get

01:01:24.100 it when

01:01:24.380 the cost

01:01:25.060 comes down

01:01:25.620 like

01:01:25.940 everything

01:01:26.560 else in

01:01:26.980 the world

01:01:27.260 works

01:01:27.680 so I

01:01:30.040 guess I

01:01:30.300 don't

01:01:30.480 understand

01:01:31.060 that

01:01:31.560 Kamala

01:01:32.680 Harris

01:01:32.960 has been

01:01:33.460 in the

01:01:33.840 past

01:01:34.240 against

01:01:34.700 fracking

01:01:35.880 Michael

01:01:36.520 Schellenberger

01:01:37.400 reminds us

01:01:38.520 that if

01:01:39.520 you're against

01:01:40.240 fracking

01:01:41.100 because it's

01:01:41.800 bad for the

01:01:42.360 environment

01:01:42.860 you're going

01:01:43.840 to have to

01:01:44.200 deal with

01:01:44.620 the fact

01:01:45.020 that the

01:01:45.440 alternative

01:01:45.880 is coal

01:01:46.680 you

01:01:47.800 this is

01:01:48.580 another half

01:01:49.140 opinion

01:01:49.420 is where

01:01:50.580 you're thinking

01:01:50.980 about half

01:01:51.480 of it

01:01:51.780 no

01:01:52.360 fracking

01:01:53.060 is bad

01:01:53.640 okay

01:01:54.920 so what

01:01:56.200 would happen

01:01:56.720 if you

01:01:57.140 ban fracking

01:01:57.840 Kamala Harris

01:01:59.460 well fracking

01:02:01.900 is bad

01:02:02.680 I know

01:02:03.160 I know

01:02:03.420 we heard

01:02:03.940 what you

01:02:04.180 said

01:02:04.360 but

01:02:05.000 what

01:02:06.140 would

01:02:06.320 happen

01:02:06.540 if

01:02:06.720 you

01:02:06.840 don't

01:02:07.080 do

01:02:07.260 it

01:02:07.520 well

01:02:09.260 fracking

01:02:09.720 could be

01:02:10.220 bad

01:02:10.640 for the

01:02:11.140 environment

01:02:11.680 no

01:02:12.120 really

01:02:12.580 okay

01:02:13.000 we got

01:02:13.340 that part

01:02:13.780 we hear

01:02:14.200 what you're

01:02:14.480 saying

01:02:14.680 about

01:02:14.880 fracking

01:02:15.260 but if

01:02:16.400 we don't

01:02:16.820 do it

01:02:17.180 what does

01:02:17.640 that look

01:02:18.000 like

01:02:18.300 can you

01:02:18.720 draw that

01:02:19.100 picture

01:02:19.420 because I

01:02:20.680 can

01:02:20.940 as

01:02:22.020 Michael

01:02:22.400 Schellenberger

01:02:22.940 helps us

01:02:23.600 we burn

01:02:24.960 way more

01:02:25.460 coal

01:02:25.920 because

01:02:28.080 that's

01:02:28.520 what's

01:02:28.760 available

01:02:29.160 and do

01:02:30.640 you think

01:02:30.900 that the

01:02:31.260 coal

01:02:31.540 business

01:02:31.960 is cleaner

01:02:32.660 or better

01:02:33.080 for the

01:02:33.360 environment

01:02:33.800 than

01:02:34.720 fracking

01:02:35.160 not even

01:02:36.340 close

01:02:36.800 fracking

01:02:37.900 is not

01:02:38.480 risk free

01:02:39.620 so let me

01:02:41.500 be as clear

01:02:42.060 as possible

01:02:42.600 comes with

01:02:43.480 risks

01:02:43.960 but not

01:02:45.660 compared to

01:02:46.200 coal

01:02:46.520 if you compare

01:02:48.560 it to

01:02:48.800 coal

01:02:49.040 it's the

01:02:49.580 you know

01:02:50.020 it's the

01:02:50.420 least

01:02:50.660 polluting

01:02:51.180 safest thing

01:02:52.380 you can

01:02:52.660 do

01:02:52.880 because coal

01:02:53.600 is pretty

01:02:54.020 well

01:02:54.380 well

01:02:56.020 connected

01:02:57.040 with

01:02:57.540 all kinds

01:02:58.900 of

01:02:59.220 health

01:03:00.340 impacts

01:03:00.800 if you

01:03:01.120 live around

01:03:01.620 it

01:03:01.780 basically

01:03:02.160 anyway

01:03:04.980 so this

01:03:06.060 is just

01:03:06.400 another

01:03:06.680 example

01:03:07.100 where the

01:03:07.640 democrats

01:03:08.200 cannot

01:03:09.080 do

01:03:09.420 any

01:03:09.700 long-term

01:03:10.500 cause and

01:03:11.440 effect

01:03:11.820 analysis

01:03:13.180 whatsoever

01:03:13.740 we really

01:03:15.540 are dealing

01:03:15.980 with brainwashing

01:03:16.920 and being

01:03:17.360 bad at

01:03:17.820 math

01:03:18.180 and to

01:03:19.500 imagine

01:03:19.860 that we

01:03:20.400 have some

01:03:20.700 kind of

01:03:20.940 priority

01:03:21.420 questions

01:03:22.080 or one

01:03:23.400 is evil

01:03:23.920 and one

01:03:24.380 isn't

01:03:24.780 nothing

01:03:25.180 like that

01:03:25.620 is going

01:03:25.900 on

01:03:26.180 there is

01:03:27.000 just

01:03:27.180 brainwashing

01:03:27.980 plus

01:03:28.900 people

01:03:29.300 who

01:03:29.740 simply

01:03:30.680 don't

01:03:31.000 have full

01:03:31.440 opinions

01:03:31.880 and

01:03:32.680 maybe

01:03:32.900 don't

01:03:33.140 know

01:03:33.360 it

01:03:33.540 because

01:03:33.760 they're

01:03:33.880 not

01:03:34.040 good

01:03:34.220 at

01:03:34.360 analyzing

01:03:34.780 things

01:03:35.240 all

01:03:36.740 right

01:03:36.920 remember

01:03:38.900 when

01:03:39.180 biden

01:03:39.480 said

01:03:39.740 he was

01:03:39.980 doing

01:03:40.160 better

01:03:40.420 on the

01:03:40.720 border

01:03:40.940 than

01:03:41.200 trump

01:03:41.520 and

01:03:42.280 it

01:03:42.480 took

01:03:42.740 it

01:03:43.380 took

01:03:43.620 me

01:03:43.900 let's

01:03:44.340 see

01:03:44.500 a

01:03:44.700 quarter

01:03:44.960 of a

01:03:45.280 second

01:03:45.580 and

01:03:46.000 i

01:03:46.120 think

01:03:46.280 you

01:03:46.460 were

01:03:46.580 with

01:03:46.800 me

01:03:46.980 too

01:03:47.240 to

01:03:47.840 say

01:03:48.080 well

01:03:48.320 that's

01:03:48.520 not

01:03:48.700 true

01:03:48.960 that's

01:03:50.220 just

01:03:50.520 totally

01:03:50.980 made

01:03:51.220 up

01:03:51.380 there's

01:03:51.640 no

01:03:51.820 way

01:03:52.160 that

01:03:52.580 biden

01:03:52.900 got

01:03:53.700 the

01:03:53.880 number

01:03:54.120 lower

01:03:54.500 than

01:03:54.760 trump

01:03:55.040 had

01:03:55.280 it

01:03:55.420 for

01:03:55.680 immigration

01:03:56.480 and

01:03:57.300 do

01:03:57.440 you

01:03:57.460 know

01:03:57.560 what

01:03:57.660 the

01:03:57.800 first

01:03:58.120 thing

01:03:58.360 i

01:03:58.540 assumed

01:03:58.840 was

01:03:59.200 that

01:04:00.380 they

01:04:00.520 were

01:04:00.660 counting

01:04:01.100 it

01:04:01.280 different

01:04:01.600 do

01:04:03.140 you

01:04:03.220 know

01:04:03.320 what

01:04:03.420 the

01:04:03.520 answer

01:04:04.020 was

01:04:04.420 they're

01:04:05.780 counting

01:04:06.100 it

01:04:06.300 different

01:04:06.620 do

01:04:07.300 you

01:04:07.420 know

01:04:07.560 why

01:04:07.860 biden

01:04:08.500 can

01:04:08.740 say

01:04:08.960 there

01:04:09.220 are

01:04:09.380 fewer

01:04:09.700 illegal

01:04:10.260 entries

01:04:11.540 because

01:04:12.460 they

01:04:12.660 legalized

01:04:13.340 it

01:04:13.560 they

01:04:14.300 said

01:04:14.600 if

01:04:14.820 you

01:04:14.940 come

01:04:15.140 through

01:04:15.320 this

01:04:15.560 doorway

01:04:15.900 we'll

01:04:16.380 take

01:04:16.620 your

01:04:16.800 name

01:04:17.200 we'll

01:04:17.460 put

01:04:17.640 you

01:04:17.720 on

01:04:17.840 the

01:04:17.960 asylum

01:04:18.320 list

01:04:18.740 you

01:04:19.420 are

01:04:19.600 now

01:04:19.840 illegal

01:04:20.320 so

01:04:21.420 when

01:04:21.600 we

01:04:21.760 talk

01:04:22.000 about

01:04:22.200 the

01:04:22.400 illegal

01:04:22.860 people

01:04:23.240 coming

01:04:23.540 in

01:04:23.720 we're

01:04:23.880 not

01:04:24.040 going

01:04:24.160 to

01:04:24.200 talk

01:04:24.380 about

01:04:24.600 you

01:04:24.900 because

01:04:26.540 you

01:04:27.300 came

01:04:27.580 in

01:04:27.880 although

01:04:28.600 you

01:04:28.880 are

01:04:29.020 not

01:04:29.240 a

01:04:29.400 citizen

01:04:29.760 and

01:04:30.680 although

01:04:30.960 you're

01:04:31.380 unlikely

01:04:31.840 to

01:04:32.120 show up

01:04:32.400 for

01:04:32.520 your

01:04:32.680 asylum

01:04:33.120 court

01:04:35.160 case

01:04:35.620 in

01:04:35.860 two

01:04:36.320 years

01:04:36.680 or

01:04:36.800 whenever

01:04:37.080 we're

01:04:38.480 not

01:04:38.640 going

01:04:38.760 to

01:04:38.820 count

01:04:38.980 you

01:04:39.120 as

01:04:39.260 illegal

01:04:39.600 because

01:04:40.020 you

01:04:40.240 came

01:04:40.460 in

01:04:40.620 through

01:04:40.760 our

01:04:40.940 process

01:04:41.500 that's

01:04:42.940 the

01:04:43.060 game

01:04:43.260 they're

01:04:43.440 playing

01:04:43.720 they

01:04:44.500 simply

01:04:44.860 just

01:04:45.180 define

01:04:45.700 it

01:04:45.840 as

01:04:46.000 legal

01:04:46.320 now

01:04:47.000 when

01:04:47.160 they

01:04:47.300 say

01:04:47.540 that

01:04:47.900 violent

01:04:52.000 I

01:04:52.860 just

01:04:53.160 assume

01:04:53.540 they're

01:04:53.740 lying

01:04:54.000 about

01:04:54.240 that

01:04:54.540 all

01:04:56.600 numbers

01:04:57.320 in

01:04:57.520 an

01:04:57.640 election

01:04:57.900 year

01:04:58.140 are

01:04:58.260 made

01:04:58.420 up

01:04:58.620 that's

01:05:01.460 correct

01:05:01.780 so

01:05:04.620 but

01:05:05.380 some

01:05:06.220 of them

01:05:06.500 would be

01:05:06.820 directionally

01:05:07.440 correct

01:05:07.780 and some

01:05:08.240 would

01:05:08.380 not

01:05:08.700 so I

01:05:09.300 think

01:05:09.500 if

01:05:09.760 Trump

01:05:10.260 says

01:05:10.680 I

01:05:10.880 did

01:05:11.060 better

01:05:11.300 than

01:05:11.500 Biden

01:05:11.780 on

01:05:11.960 the

01:05:12.080 border

01:05:12.360 that

01:05:13.420 is

01:05:13.620 directionally

01:05:14.320 correct

01:05:14.800 would

01:05:16.020 you

01:05:16.160 agree

01:05:16.420 if

01:05:17.840 Trump

01:05:18.400 says

01:05:18.940 I'll

01:05:20.380 be

01:05:20.840 better

01:05:21.160 for

01:05:21.640 energy

01:05:22.460 production

01:05:22.960 in the

01:05:23.320 country

01:05:23.660 well

01:05:25.220 he might

01:05:25.760 say

01:05:25.960 some

01:05:26.180 whoppers

01:05:26.740 as part

01:05:27.140 of that

01:05:27.400 but

01:05:27.600 directionally

01:05:28.240 we all

01:05:29.240 agree

01:05:29.520 that he

01:05:29.880 would be

01:05:30.220 better

01:05:30.500 for

01:05:30.800 domestic

01:05:32.040 energy

01:05:32.600 here's

01:05:34.360 an

01:05:34.480 interesting

01:05:34.820 update

01:05:35.280 remember

01:05:35.600 that

01:05:35.820 Chinese

01:05:36.280 spy

01:05:36.620 balloon

01:05:36.980 apparently

01:05:38.280 one of

01:05:38.980 the reasons

01:05:39.280 we shot

01:05:39.740 it down

01:05:40.120 in the

01:05:40.400 ocean

01:05:40.680 is so

01:05:41.700 that our

01:05:42.100 divers

01:05:42.540 could go

01:05:43.020 in

01:05:43.240 and

01:05:43.480 recover

01:05:43.960 it

01:05:44.220 and

01:05:44.380 look

01:05:44.620 at

01:05:44.720 all

01:05:44.860 their

01:05:45.000 technology

01:05:45.540 and

01:05:45.800 see

01:05:46.040 what

01:05:46.220 China

01:05:46.460 is

01:05:46.600 up

01:05:46.740 to

01:05:46.920 and

01:05:47.660 now

01:05:47.840 they've

01:05:48.040 done

01:05:48.180 that

01:05:48.420 reportedly

01:05:49.340 the

01:05:49.980 government

01:05:50.440 divers

01:05:51.180 got the

01:05:51.700 good

01:05:51.900 stuff

01:05:52.220 and

01:05:53.240 now

01:05:53.620 they

01:05:53.800 have

01:05:53.980 a

01:05:54.180 much

01:05:54.480 better

01:05:54.720 idea

01:05:55.020 what

01:05:55.240 China

01:05:55.580 can

01:05:56.000 and

01:05:56.160 cannot

01:05:56.400 do

01:05:56.740 with

01:05:57.480 their

01:05:57.620 spy

01:05:57.880 balloons

01:05:58.220 so

01:05:59.240 at least

01:05:59.880 that's

01:06:00.100 a little

01:06:00.380 positive

01:06:00.760 something

01:06:01.220 there's

01:06:07.660 somebody

01:06:08.500 yelling

01:06:09.040 in all

01:06:09.420 caps

01:06:09.800 some

01:06:11.040 hallucinations

01:06:12.080 about me

01:06:12.640 so

01:06:14.440 there's

01:06:14.780 somebody

01:06:15.020 who thinks

01:06:15.400 that they

01:06:15.700 could read

01:06:16.080 my mind

01:06:16.660 and is

01:06:18.060 yelling

01:06:18.320 in all

01:06:18.660 caps

01:06:19.000 about

01:06:20.000 the

01:06:20.460 pandemic

01:06:20.920 if

01:06:21.760 you're

01:06:21.920 still

01:06:22.100 talking

01:06:22.420 about

01:06:22.660 the

01:06:22.800 pandemic

01:06:23.200 and

01:06:24.540 you

01:06:24.680 think

01:06:24.900 that

01:06:25.040 that's

01:06:25.280 like

01:06:25.500 the

01:06:25.660 important

01:06:26.000 thing

01:06:26.240 to

01:06:26.460 scream 0.99

01:06:26.860 in the

01:06:27.160 comments

01:06:27.540 today

01:06:27.860 you're

01:06:28.940 a

01:06:29.020 fucking

01:06:29.240 idiot

01:06:29.640 we're

01:06:33.100 so

01:06:33.380 over

01:06:33.740 that

01:06:34.120 so

01:06:35.340 making

01:06:35.880 up

01:06:36.120 some

01:06:36.360 fake

01:06:36.760 rumors

01:06:37.180 about

01:06:37.520 me

01:06:37.740 from

01:06:37.920 the

01:06:38.080 pandemic

01:06:38.480 and

01:06:38.860 inserting

01:06:39.240 it

01:06:39.400 now

01:06:39.660 what

01:06:40.820 is

01:06:40.980 wrong

01:06:41.260 with

01:06:41.440 you

01:06:41.640 just

01:06:43.200 what

01:06:43.420 is

01:06:43.580 wrong

01:06:43.840 with

01:06:44.020 you

01:06:44.260 anyway

01:06:45.900 Musk 0.77

01:06:48.420 has

01:06:48.740 an

01:06:50.080 opinion

01:06:50.360 of

01:06:50.600 who

01:06:50.760 should

01:06:50.900 win

01:06:51.140 the

01:06:51.320 election

01:06:51.640 in

01:06:51.880 Venezuela

01:06:52.300 I

01:06:53.320 guess

01:06:53.500 he

01:06:53.620 likes

01:06:53.900 Maria

01:06:54.440 Karina

01:06:54.980 Machado

01:06:55.900 I

01:06:56.380 don't

01:06:56.500 know

01:06:56.640 anything

01:06:56.860 about

01:06:57.180 her

01:06:57.300 but

01:06:57.560 she

01:06:59.060 noted

01:06:59.640 that

01:07:00.060 Musk 0.77

01:07:01.280 had

01:07:01.700 endorsed

01:07:02.240 her

01:07:02.500 and

01:07:03.920 I've

01:07:05.920 got a

01:07:06.140 question

01:07:06.520 I

01:07:07.660 thought

01:07:07.940 Venezuela

01:07:08.580 was a

01:07:09.280 dictatorship

01:07:09.740 now

01:07:10.720 how are

01:07:12.580 they having

01:07:12.940 an election

01:07:13.480 is this

01:07:15.240 real

01:07:15.540 I

01:07:16.900 guess

01:07:17.340 I

01:07:17.500 thought

01:07:17.760 that

01:07:18.040 Venezuela

01:07:18.500 had

01:07:18.860 gone

01:07:19.260 to

01:07:20.580 their

01:07:20.900 dictator

01:07:21.540 guy

01:07:21.920 was it

01:07:22.320 Maduro

01:07:22.720 or

01:07:22.940 whatever

01:07:23.200 but

01:07:23.840 how do

01:07:24.140 you

01:07:24.280 un-dictator

01:07:24.960 it

01:07:25.240 did

01:07:26.440 he

01:07:26.580 actually

01:07:26.860 just

01:07:27.180 agree

01:07:27.600 to

01:07:28.620 hold

01:07:28.860 a

01:07:29.020 real

01:07:29.300 open

01:07:29.700 election

01:07:30.120 and

01:07:30.900 there's

01:07:31.160 real

01:07:31.560 democratically

01:07:33.840 oriented

01:07:34.420 people

01:07:34.780 in the

01:07:35.060 election

01:07:35.400 is that

01:07:36.000 actually

01:07:36.360 happening

01:07:36.780 there's

01:07:37.960 something

01:07:38.160 about

01:07:38.420 this

01:07:38.640 story

01:07:39.060 that

01:07:40.600 seems

01:07:40.940 really

01:07:41.400 important

01:07:41.860 in a

01:07:42.220 good

01:07:42.380 way

01:07:42.660 if it's

01:07:43.300 true

01:07:43.600 the

01:07:44.440 good

01:07:44.640 way

01:07:44.860 would

01:07:45.040 be

01:07:45.260 did

01:07:45.520 we

01:07:45.700 somehow

01:07:46.260 or

01:07:47.080 did

01:07:47.260 Venezuela

01:07:47.680 somehow

01:07:48.180 maybe

01:07:49.060 with or

01:07:49.420 without

01:07:49.600 our

01:07:49.920 help

01:07:50.260 did

01:07:51.280 they

01:07:51.440 somehow

01:07:51.740 right

01:07:52.060 that

01:07:52.300 ship

01:07:52.640 are

01:07:54.260 they

01:07:54.440 actually

01:07:54.860 on a

01:07:55.200 way

01:07:55.400 toward

01:07:55.700 improving

01:07:56.620 things

01:07:57.140 like

01:07:57.600 what

01:07:57.780 happened

01:07:58.080 there

01:07:58.360 anyway

01:08:01.800 so I

01:08:02.620 don't know

01:08:02.820 if this

01:08:03.100 is a

01:08:03.400 real

01:08:03.600 election

01:08:04.020 or not

01:08:04.480 in

01:08:05.500 other

01:08:05.720 news

01:08:06.220 Hezbollah

01:08:06.960 did a

01:08:07.540 deadly

01:08:07.960 attack

01:08:08.420 on

01:08:08.760 Golan

01:08:09.460 Heights

01:08:09.940 in

01:08:10.440 Israel

01:08:10.780 and

01:08:11.980 killed

01:08:12.500 I think

01:08:13.060 it's up

01:08:13.500 to 12

01:08:14.040 last

01:08:14.480 I looked

01:08:15.220 12

01:08:15.680 deaths

01:08:16.120 and

01:08:16.980 more

01:08:17.300 injuries

01:08:17.640 and

01:08:19.280 of course

01:08:20.900 it's

01:08:21.320 an

01:08:22.280 Iranian

01:08:22.680 supplied

01:08:23.440 rocket

01:08:24.200 that did

01:08:24.780 it

01:08:25.000 and

01:08:26.420 then the

01:08:26.980 question is

01:08:27.640 will Israel 0.54

01:08:28.580 have to go

01:08:29.100 in a

01:08:29.400 major war

01:08:30.040 to destroy

01:08:30.880 Hezbollah

01:08:31.560 isn't that

01:08:33.420 guaranteed

01:08:34.000 does

01:08:36.560 anybody

01:08:37.140 think that

01:08:37.720 Israel

01:08:38.080 will not

01:08:38.740 destroy

01:08:39.200 Hezbollah

01:08:39.660 now

01:08:40.860 I've

01:08:41.480 heard

01:08:41.640 it

01:08:41.780 said

01:08:42.100 that

01:08:43.180 would

01:08:43.380 not

01:08:43.540 be

01:08:43.720 easy

01:08:44.040 like

01:08:44.340 Gaza

01:08:44.720 I mean

01:08:45.140 as if

01:08:45.660 Gaza

01:08:45.960 is

01:08:46.140 easy

01:08:46.400 but

01:08:46.980 it

01:08:47.100 wouldn't

01:08:47.320 be

01:08:47.540 even

01:08:47.920 doable

01:08:48.420 because

01:08:49.640 now

01:08:50.140 Hezbollah

01:08:50.480 has

01:08:50.780 so many

01:08:52.120 rockets

01:08:52.640 already

01:08:53.440 aimed

01:08:53.720 at Israel

01:08:54.200 that if

01:08:55.140 they made

01:08:55.520 a major

01:08:55.960 war play

01:08:56.700 the rockets

01:08:57.700 would launch

01:08:58.280 and Israel

01:08:59.200 would get

01:08:59.760 whacked

01:09:00.300 they wouldn't

01:09:00.640 have enough

01:09:01.080 iron dome

01:09:01.880 to take

01:09:02.260 them all

01:09:02.540 down

01:09:02.820 now I

01:09:03.600 don't

01:09:03.680 know if

01:09:03.900 any of

01:09:04.160 that's

01:09:04.360 true

01:09:04.640 I mean

01:09:06.060 it sounds

01:09:06.460 true

01:09:06.980 if you

01:09:07.460 see the

01:09:07.800 numbers

01:09:08.200 it looks

01:09:09.400 like Israel 0.98

01:09:10.180 would have

01:09:10.640 a tough

01:09:11.020 time

01:09:11.340 but I

01:09:12.460 also

01:09:12.660 wonder

01:09:12.940 isn't the

01:09:14.660 whole point

01:09:15.320 to eventually

01:09:16.940 get enough

01:09:17.440 missiles so

01:09:18.180 that when

01:09:18.480 they do

01:09:18.820 attack

01:09:19.220 they can

01:09:19.660 destroy

01:09:20.100 all of

01:09:20.520 Israel

01:09:20.800 I mean

01:09:22.620 if you

01:09:23.120 were just

01:09:23.460 to say

01:09:23.840 well maybe

01:09:24.440 we should

01:09:24.800 wait

01:09:25.200 because

01:09:26.220 they're just

01:09:26.560 doing these

01:09:26.960 low level

01:09:27.520 attacks

01:09:28.060 and even

01:09:28.420 though

01:09:28.600 people die

01:09:29.240 it's

01:09:29.520 better than

01:09:29.860 a full

01:09:30.160 out

01:09:30.320 war

01:09:30.620 is it

01:09:32.360 is it

01:09:34.100 better than

01:09:34.440 a full

01:09:34.680 out

01:09:34.840 war

01:09:35.080 maybe

01:09:36.000 Israel

01:09:36.380 just needs

01:09:36.880 to get

01:09:37.140 it over

01:09:37.440 with

01:09:37.740 because

01:09:38.340 the

01:09:38.540 full

01:09:38.720 out

01:09:38.860 war

01:09:39.040 is

01:09:39.160 going

01:09:39.300 to

01:09:39.380 come

01:09:39.740 but

01:09:41.160 why

01:09:41.460 would

01:09:41.640 you

01:09:41.760 wait

01:09:41.980 until

01:09:42.180 the

01:09:42.360 other

01:09:42.540 side

01:09:42.780 was

01:09:42.960 better

01:09:43.220 armed

01:09:43.620 and

01:09:43.960 had

01:09:44.120 enough

01:09:44.340 missiles

01:09:44.720 that

01:09:44.960 they

01:09:45.100 could

01:09:45.240 take

01:09:45.500 out

01:09:45.680 your

01:09:45.960 civilization

01:09:46.760 in

01:09:47.120 six

01:09:48.000 hours

01:09:48.400 would

01:09:49.660 you

01:09:49.800 let

01:09:50.060 them

01:09:50.200 do

01:09:50.340 that

01:09:50.580 and

01:09:52.140 I

01:09:52.340 don't

01:09:52.460 know

01:09:52.560 what

01:09:52.660 the

01:09:52.760 options

01:09:53.100 are

01:09:53.360 I

01:09:54.420 don't

01:09:54.540 know

01:09:54.660 what

01:09:54.760 it

01:09:54.840 take

01:09:55.160 but

01:09:55.940 I

01:09:56.180 can't

01:09:56.520 imagine

01:09:56.860 that

01:09:57.060 Israel

01:09:57.400 won't

01:09:58.040 destroy

01:09:58.920 Hezbollah

01:09:59.480 one way

01:10:00.980 or the

01:10:01.200 other

01:10:01.400 they'll

01:10:01.660 wait

01:10:01.820 until

01:10:02.040 Gaza

01:10:02.440 may be

01:10:03.100 digested

01:10:03.740 a little

01:10:03.980 bit

01:10:04.260 so the

01:10:05.680 military

01:10:06.000 has

01:10:06.400 a little

01:10:07.120 more

01:10:07.300 flexibility

01:10:07.860 but

01:10:08.880 can it

01:10:11.860 only go

01:10:12.280 one way

01:10:12.800 I don't

01:10:14.400 see how

01:10:14.740 it can

01:10:15.000 go a

01:10:15.280 different

01:10:15.500 way

01:10:16.000 Jenny

01:10:21.220 so

01:10:22.880 Jenny

01:10:23.260 the

01:10:23.480 idiot

01:10:23.840 is

01:10:25.520 still

01:10:25.720 yelling

01:10:26.040 in

01:10:26.220 all

01:10:26.400 caps

01:10:26.760 but

01:10:27.260 yelling

01:10:27.520 the

01:10:27.720 same

01:10:27.940 thing

01:10:28.180 over

01:10:28.420 and

01:10:28.580 over

01:10:28.860 Jenny

01:10:34.080 are you

01:10:34.600 having

01:10:34.860 a

01:10:35.100 situation

01:10:35.880 do

01:10:37.140 do

01:10:37.780 we

01:10:37.960 need

01:10:38.180 to

01:10:38.540 get

01:10:39.600 a

01:10:39.760 family

01:10:40.060 member

01:10:40.380 to

01:10:40.600 look

01:10:40.760 into

01:10:40.980 this

01:10:41.300 are

01:10:42.120 you

01:10:42.260 off

01:10:42.480 your

01:10:42.640 meds

01:10:43.540 Jenny

01:10:45.460 or

01:10:48.920 it

01:10:49.180 could

01:10:49.380 be

01:10:49.580 somebody

01:10:49.880 with

01:10:50.080 a

01:10:50.200 different

01:10:50.440 name

01:10:50.760 yeah

01:10:52.140 okay

01:10:53.840 anyway

01:10:54.220 I

01:10:54.860 would

01:10:55.000 love

01:10:55.640 if

01:10:56.420 I

01:10:56.560 could

01:10:56.700 have

01:10:56.860 one

01:10:57.140 magical

01:10:57.620 power

01:10:58.100 it

01:10:59.100 would

01:10:59.220 be

01:10:59.400 to

01:10:59.680 transport

01:11:00.320 into

01:11:00.740 the

01:11:00.980 room

01:11:01.300 of

01:11:01.520 the

01:11:01.660 person

01:11:01.920 who

01:11:02.080 is

01:11:02.200 my

01:11:02.400 troll

01:11:02.700 and

01:11:04.040 just

01:11:04.200 like

01:11:04.380 appear

01:11:04.740 next

01:11:05.040 to

01:11:05.180 their

01:11:05.340 computer

01:11:05.760 and

01:11:06.840 just

01:11:07.000 see

01:11:07.300 what

01:11:08.040 the

01:11:08.160 hell

01:11:08.280 are

01:11:08.380 you

01:11:08.460 doing

01:11:08.760 why

01:11:10.340 are

01:11:10.460 you

01:11:10.520 doing

01:11:10.700 that

01:11:11.040 what

01:11:11.980 what

01:11:12.600 what

01:11:12.680 gain

01:11:15.100 are

01:11:15.300 you

01:11:15.420 looking

01:11:15.660 for

01:11:16.040 what's

01:11:17.440 your

01:11:17.560 upside

01:11:17.980 for

01:11:18.200 this

01:11:18.560 Jenny

01:11:19.380 the

01:11:19.640 idiot

01:11:19.980 Venezuela

01:11:25.440 has

01:11:25.900 never

01:11:26.200 been

01:11:26.420 a

01:11:26.600 dictatorship

01:11:27.140 Maduro

01:11:27.900 won

01:11:28.320 an

01:11:28.520 election

01:11:28.880 are

01:11:30.720 you

01:11:31.000 a

01:11:31.240 Venezuelan

01:11:31.880 troll

01:11:32.160 I'm

01:11:33.160 supposed

01:11:33.400 to

01:11:33.580 believe

01:11:33.800 that

01:11:34.060 I'm

01:11:36.260 supposed

01:11:36.500 to

01:11:36.700 believe

01:11:36.920 that

01:11:37.080 was

01:11:37.220 a

01:11:37.440 free

01:11:37.680 and

01:11:37.880 fair

01:11:38.060 election

01:11:38.460 okay

01:11:42.320 sure

01:11:43.640 we had

01:11:52.820 the

01:11:52.940 worst

01:11:53.300 fires

01:11:54.220 in

01:11:54.440 2020

01:11:54.900 and

01:11:55.560 not

01:11:55.860 much

01:11:56.080 CO2

01:11:56.620 I

01:11:57.460 don't

01:11:59.760 know

01:11:59.880 about

01:12:00.080 that

01:12:00.440 I

01:12:01.420 mean

01:12:01.560 you

01:12:01.940 might

01:12:02.160 be

01:12:02.280 making

01:12:02.560 a

01:12:02.700 good

01:12:02.840 point

01:12:03.140 I

01:12:03.340 don't

01:12:03.420 know

01:12:03.640 all

01:12:08.700 right

01:12:08.900 ladies 0.99

01:12:10.260 and

01:12:10.480 gentlemen

01:12:10.780 that

01:12:11.260 is

01:12:11.480 what

01:12:11.660 I

01:12:11.760 have

01:12:11.940 for

01:12:12.080 you

01:12:12.160 for

01:12:12.380 today

01:12:13.020 I'm

01:12:14.940 going

01:12:15.040 to

01:12:15.120 say

01:12:15.300 goodbye

01:12:15.640 to

01:12:15.980 the

01:12:16.340 folks

01:12:17.460 on

01:12:17.760 X

01:12:18.140 and

01:12:18.660 YouTube

01:12:19.160 and

01:12:20.200 Rumble

01:12:20.520 I'm

01:12:20.800 going

01:12:20.880 to

01:12:20.960 talk

01:12:21.160 to

01:12:21.300 the

01:12:21.480 subscribers

01:12:22.180 only

01:12:23.560 Jenny

01:12:29.280 the

01:12:29.520 idiot

01:12:29.720 says

01:12:30.020 did

01:12:30.580 you

01:12:30.720 make

01:12:30.940 up

01:12:31.100 the

01:12:31.260 secret

01:12:31.560 insider

01:12:31.980 friend

01:12:32.300 that

01:12:32.480 warned

01:12:32.680 you

01:12:32.820 about

01:12:33.060 COVID

01:12:33.420 to

01:12:34.580 cover

01:12:34.880 for

01:12:35.360 being

01:12:36.880 duped

01:12:37.480 Jenny

01:12:41.100 you

01:12:41.300 just

01:12:41.500 have

01:12:41.680 bad

01:12:41.940 facts

01:12:42.400 so

01:12:44.300 you

01:12:44.540 can

01:12:44.740 yell

01:12:45.020 all

01:12:45.260 day

01:12:45.540 but

01:12:46.820 nothing

01:12:47.160 will

01:12:47.380 take

01:12:47.600 us

01:12:47.760 back

01:12:47.980 to

01:12:48.140 the

01:12:48.260 past

01:12:48.640 you

01:12:49.100 need

01:12:49.320 to

01:12:49.440 get

01:12:49.580 back

01:12:49.840 on

01:12:49.960 your

01:12:50.100 meds

01:12:51.020 Jenny

01:12:52.060 and

01:12:54.040 stop

01:12:54.420 being

01:12:54.600 a

01:12:54.740 fucking

01:12:54.980 cunt 1.00

01:12:55.380 and

01:12:57.340 just

01:12:58.020 go

01:12:58.400 fix

01:12:58.660 your

01:12:58.800 life

01:12:59.120 all

01:13:00.440 right

01:13:00.540 we're

01:13:00.780 going

01:13:00.840 to

01:13:00.860 go

01:13:01.000 talk

01:13:01.260 to

01:13:01.440 the

01:13:01.740 people

01:13:03.520 on

01:13:04.040 locals

01:13:04.700 who

01:13:05.300 are

01:13:05.460 not

01:13:05.680 like

01:13:05.920 Jenny

01:13:06.200 they're

01:13:06.800 good

01:13:07.000 people

01:13:07.360 all

01:13:08.460 right

01:13:08.520 the

01:13:08.640 rest

01:13:08.820 of

01:13:08.940 you

01:13:09.020 I'll

01:13:09.140 see

01:13:09.260 you

01:13:09.320 tomorrow

01:13:09.640 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 28, 2024

Episode 2549 CWSA 07⧸28⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript