Episode 2565 CWSA 08⧸13⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 37 minutes
Words per Minute
151.28462
Summary
Elon Musk had a two-and-a-half hour long conversation with the candidate for president, Donald Trump, and Scott Adams is here to talk about it, and why it was a weird thing to do.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
and i don't mean trump's conversation with musk but we'll talk about that however if you'd like
00:00:06.600
to take this experience up to levels that people can't even understand with their tiny shiny human
00:00:12.440
brains all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker chalice or stein a canteen jugger flask
00:00:17.200
a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the
00:00:22.920
unparalleled pleasure the dopamine at the end of the day the thing that makes everything better
00:00:27.100
it's called the simultaneous sip and it's going to happen right now go
00:00:30.080
oh so good so so good well i know what you want to talk about you want to talk about that big event
00:00:44.280
on spaces on x last night where elon musk had a two hour or more conversation with the candidate trump
00:00:53.760
and you're all wondering scott what did you think about it well
00:01:00.080
well i think it was sort of a mixed bag so i'll tell you the good and the bad
00:01:08.080
i won't hold back so i started a little late uh elon musk came on and said there was a
00:01:15.220
massive denial of service attack which means somebody just hits the site a lot of times until
00:01:22.240
it's too busy so everybody else can't get in the wall street journal said uh right before the event
00:01:30.240
uh musk cited without evidence a massive ddos attack cited without evidence is the wall street
00:01:39.280
journal suggesting that elon musk lied about the technical problems i had at the show
00:01:45.760
how long do you have to watch elon musk in public talking about just about everything to know that
00:01:55.260
he wouldn't lie about that of all things he would lie about like well i can't think of anything he's
00:02:02.400
ever lied about he's been wrong a few times like everybody but what has he ever known the truth about
00:02:10.420
something and then said in public opposite of that truth is that even the thing no if if he would
00:02:19.620
certainly know if it was a denial of service attack and he would certainly tell you and if it wasn't
00:02:26.900
i'm sure he would say this is the first time we've tried something of this size
00:02:31.220
systems getting crashed why why would you even think that he would even be a little bit inclined to
00:02:37.380
lie about that even though it's his product yeah now normal people would lie maybe they'd spend it a
00:02:44.100
little bit he's not normal he spent like a gazillion dollars more than anybody should spend on the
00:02:50.580
website to to protect free speech he didn't do that so he could lie to you to me it's just weird that
00:02:57.620
you'd even suspect a lie in that context from him anyway so elana uh explained that he was looking for
00:03:06.820
something less adversarial and more conversational it is his theory was that you'll get to know the
00:03:14.980
candidate better if it's more of a casual conversation than a attack and response attack and response which
00:03:22.340
is a normal interview um i thought that was a terrific sounding idea there was a problem with it though
00:03:32.900
it's called donald trump so it turns out that when you remove the physical cues as in sitting in front of
00:03:41.460
somebody that person doesn't know when the conversation should move to the next topic
00:03:48.020
i think when you remove the physical cues you know where somebody indicates that they're ready for the next
00:03:53.700
question you know if you're in a conversation with the person in person uh they they'll start nodding
00:04:00.260
you know the nodding says yeah i got it i got it hurry up or yeah we said this before or or they'll
00:04:06.420
look at their notes like they're ready to go to the next question or something so there are a lot of
00:04:10.660
physical cues that were not available for the conversation and i think what that created
00:04:17.860
was a let's say uh a conversation that didn't have guardrails meaning that neither participant knew
00:04:26.420
how long something should go you know when do you when do you stop doing whatever you're doing and do
00:04:32.420
something else you know some of the normal cues of conversation were missing and trump did what trump
00:04:40.580
does which is if there's an empty space he fills it completely i mean you you wouldn't even like him if
00:04:49.860
he didn't do that uh trump says if you're going to leave free money on the table i'll pick it up
00:04:56.340
if there's a silence i'll fill it with my message so you hear my message so because the phone is a
00:05:03.860
terrible way to interrupt somebody and normal conversations have interruptions where if somebody's
00:05:10.500
going on too long the other person will kind of cut in you know and maybe the cutting in would be the
00:05:16.180
your your signal that maybe that answer is going on too long but uh elon didn't really have the
00:05:22.900
option of cutting in one because it's trump but the other is that i don't know if the technology lets
00:05:29.460
you interrupt you know when you're on the phone sometimes you can't hear the interrupter and there's
00:05:34.260
a little time lag and something so i think he didn't have probably didn't have the option of interrupting
00:05:39.940
which allowed trump to simply make of it what he wanted to make of it and so to me it was trump's
00:05:47.380
stump speech and the things he usually says and went on way too long because you know musk to his credit
00:05:56.500
was testing out a new a new way of doing something so let me say something about that
00:06:00.980
because nobody had ever done something quite like this which is somebody like elon musk you know who's
00:06:09.860
like him nobody talking to somebody like trump with an extended conversation i love that musk took a
00:06:18.500
chance on this if this had gone terrible or this had gone great i would love it because this is what we
00:06:26.260
need more of somebody having an idea hey i have an idea of how we can improve the communication or
00:06:33.860
anything let's try it out if it doesn't work it will only embarrass me now that's the attitude
00:06:42.740
what's more perfect than that if you're going to learn anything from last night had nothing to do with
00:06:48.500
anything trump said if you're going to learn one thing it's learn how to put yourself in a place where
00:06:55.300
you could be embarrassed but if it worked out everybody would be ahead that's perfect you
00:07:03.140
you want you want a million of that um you don't want the people who are just playing it safe all the
00:07:08.500
time right this wasn't the biggest risk so he just puts himself out there maybe this will work maybe it
00:07:14.500
won't we'll see what happens now to be honest i think it didn't work more than it worked
00:07:20.500
you know i'll give you some details on that but it's still genius it's still brilliant it's still
00:07:26.820
brave it's still right in terms of a system if you think of it in terms of a goal you know what was the
00:07:34.340
goal or like the goal would be a nice informative you know tell you something you didn't know get more
00:07:41.140
people involved you know that might have been the goal but but if you think of it as a system and i think
00:07:46.820
musk probably thinks more like systems you say to yourself the current systems for information are
00:07:52.820
incomplete what would you do about that well what you do about that is test some new systems so that's
00:08:00.420
what he did it's kind of perfect from a system perspective from a goal perspective did you nail
00:08:08.580
exactly what you hoped you would nail well somewhat you know partial i'll say partial success but some
00:08:16.340
risk let's talk about that first of all i've got great questions about how many people experienced it
00:08:24.100
because the numbers are all over the place i think there are 1.3 million people listening live which is a
00:08:31.940
lot but not you know world changing number but apparently 77 million had some kind of an impression
00:08:40.020
meaning they at least sampled it i guess but a lot of people have some audio problems and the denial of
00:08:45.780
service thing probably you know they tried a few times and couldn't get in and probably quit and uh i
00:08:52.260
think elon said there was something like a billion interactions you know if you count the secondary effect
00:08:58.180
a lot of people had viewing parties and they streamed it on their stream and and all that which by the
00:09:03.860
way i love the fact that elon didn't seem to be wanting to hammer anybody who was rebroadcasting it
00:09:13.700
now in theory musk could have said hey this is our content you know the only people who can watch
00:09:19.380
it are the people watching it natively not somebody watching somebody else's podcast which is also
00:09:25.220
watching it he could have but that's not that's not the way he rolls i i think he wanted maximum
00:09:31.620
free speech maximum reach again from a systems perspective 100 the right decision let let people
00:09:40.500
let people have fun with it let just let it out there let people do whatever they want with it
00:09:45.460
and the more people will see it so that was perfect as well so i thought trump uh went on too long
00:09:53.860
sort of went into his stump speech and complaining about his usual things and his usual hyperbole and
00:09:59.780
his insults for the other people a lot of things we'd seen before and way too much about the border
00:10:06.980
just way too much and i think that was what the experiment found is if you don't have a little bit
00:10:14.420
of structure on it somebody as uh as verbose and opportunistic as trump is just going to fill all
00:10:22.100
the space and that's pretty much what he did for about two hours all right here's the biggest issue
00:10:28.900
in my opinion um some say that there was something wrong with the audio because apparently there's a known
00:10:36.340
problem with the hosts of the spaces uh having some compression problem and it will sometimes make
00:10:44.980
them sound like they have dentures or make them sound like they're slurring so i was listening to it and
00:10:52.100
my first take was this could end trump's entire campaign that's how bad i thought it was because
00:10:59.540
um i didn't know what it was when i heard it i thought why does it sound like he has his dentures
00:11:06.180
are loose or he slurring so he would be talking normally like this and then suddenly you'll be
00:11:11.700
flirting a little bit like this and you sound like maybe his dentures were falling out and then he'd go
00:11:17.300
back to normal talking and i was sitting there thinking what the hell is this there's nothing we've ever
00:11:24.340
heard before like not even a little bit you know when when uh biden was going all dementia you could
00:11:32.180
see it for years a little bit so that when it when it got bad anybody who'd been paying attention said
00:11:40.500
well there's the natural progression of what we've been watching for five years so no surprise but there's
00:11:46.980
no there's no hint of this in anything trump's ever done before so it would be highly unusual that he
00:11:56.500
has some kind of weird lispy loose dentures i don't think he has dentures by the way um or that he had
00:12:03.060
dental work and didn't mention it if he had dental work he certainly would have known his own voice was
00:12:08.740
weird and he would have mentioned it i think that's fair now what i was worried about is not that there was
00:12:16.020
something wrong with trump although i did worry about that i guess let me take that back i didn't
00:12:21.380
worry about it up until somebody said oh that's a microphone thing yeah we're aware of that that's a
00:12:27.620
that's a known effect from exactly that situation a host on spaces people say that's a known thing i don't
00:12:36.100
know i can't can't uh can't confirm it from my own impressions but apparently vivek sounded like that
00:12:44.180
a little bit and we know he doesn't have that slur so i can't confirm what caused it my suspicion is
00:12:53.380
microphone compression but i've never heard of that and i've never heard other people have it so i don't
00:12:59.620
know what i do know is from a political perspective it might be one of the most damaging things i've ever
00:13:05.460
seen in politics because if you look at what the democrats are saying their entire messaging is he's
00:13:12.500
slurring he's got mental problems he's old uh it's bad now i guess the good news is that our news is so
00:13:23.620
siloed that unless you go look for it you would never see it if you're a republican you just never
00:13:29.460
even see that the democrats universally are saying he's slurring and rambling and i think rambling and
00:13:35.860
slurring were the words that they were settling on for their attacks and let me tell you if you saw
00:13:42.740
if you just listen to a clip or you listen to part of it and then you heard their interpretation
00:13:49.220
that he was slurring and rambling you would hear slurring and rambling and it would make you wonder
00:13:56.260
what's going on so i thought it was i mean there there was literally a point where i said to my audience
00:14:04.420
because i was watching it live as well um it might end is actually end his campaign it was actually
00:14:10.900
that bad in my opinion now the the thing working against that is that people believe what they want
00:14:19.540
to believe and they've already made up their decision that there might be zero people who
00:14:24.020
change their vote because of this i don't think it would matter what he did and you can say that
00:14:29.620
about any other candidate at this point in the race everybody's made up their mind right the so
00:14:36.900
i heard him slurring is that going to change my vote no is is there anybody listening to this is
00:14:44.500
there even one person who listened to that and then changed their vote is there one person even one
00:14:50.980
person who said you know i was all in for trump but then i heard that microphone slurring thing and
00:14:56.980
changed my mind no because if he comes out and does his speech today and he talks in his normal trump
00:15:03.060
way well that's the end of it so the sooner he says something in public and we get it on audio and it
00:15:10.580
sounds perfect and i think it will i mean i'm pretty sure it's a microphone problem but uh the sooner he
00:15:17.700
does that the better because we we need to you know he needs to erase that memory from the public as soon as
00:15:24.500
possible and it would be ideal if if he knew what the problem was it would be ideal if he got somebody
00:15:32.260
who is a engineer to create a tweet and maybe even demonstrate it say look here here's this uh slurring
00:15:42.420
thing here's an example of somebody who doesn't slur you can hear the audio of them originally now here
00:15:48.100
is them going through the compression you can see this this is what happened to trump and then have trump
00:15:53.780
repost it and say you know look at those lying democrats saying that there was a problem
00:16:00.900
but i think he needs to do it soon so if there's anybody who's an engineer who's ever tested this
00:16:07.940
and by the way i'm not 100 sure what's going on so if you think i'm saying i know that it was a
00:16:13.860
microphone problem i definitely don't know that that's not my area of expertise and i hadn't seen it
00:16:19.620
before so i have no background to have an opinion one way or the other i just think it's more likely
00:16:25.860
because it would be weird if this is the one time he had massive slurring now the good news is that trump
00:16:31.940
doesn't drink how good news is that talk about you know adding to the list of reasons not to drink
00:16:41.460
if if trump was known if anybody even thought he'd ever had a drink you would have thought he was drunk
00:16:48.420
just because the voice compression problem so i love the fact that not a single person
00:16:56.260
said he sounded drunk if literally if that had been any other human being i would have said hmm
00:17:03.380
i think drunk but i love the fact that trump is so famously a non-drinker non-druggy non-cigarettes
00:17:11.140
that doesn't even come up i mean if you're going to pick one positive that's a pretty big positive
00:17:18.100
actually i do love the fact that as a role model yeah maybe he's a little he's got some habits that
00:17:27.620
you wouldn't want to copy but that's a good one the staying off the alcohol um let's see what else we
00:17:37.140
got going so it was long and i thought it was uh extra boring i i think uh musk had a little trouble
00:17:44.020
ending it or knowing when to end some of it was not wanting to force the ending just to let it have a
00:17:49.300
natural end and i think trump trump ended up ending it himself and some of it is how do you stop him
00:17:56.340
from talking and some of it is maybe thinking you hadn't gotten some good stuff yet so the longer you
00:18:02.580
talk the more good stuff you'd get but here's some takeaways uh both musk and uh trump mispronounced
00:18:12.740
kamala harris's name they both called her kamala and uh you know i i just don't know what to to do
00:18:22.580
about that um because i spent a lot of time mispronouncing her name and i'm pretty sure it
00:18:28.420
wasn't out of racism because i really like to say people's names correctly you know whether i like them
00:18:34.820
or not i think saying somebody's name correctly is it's like way up there in importance if i can do it
00:18:40.740
you know there's some i can't pronounce like chamath whose last name will always always get away from
00:18:46.980
me but uh i like to say them right when i can but it's just weird that it's almost impossible for
00:18:54.180
people to remember from one time to the other how to say her name searchlight pictures presents the
00:19:01.700
roses only in theaters august 29th from the director of meet the parents and the writer of poor things
00:19:07.780
comes the roses starring academy award winner olivia coleman academy award nominee benedict
00:19:13.540
cumberbatch andy sandberg kate mckinnon and allison janney a hilarious new comedy filled with drama
00:19:19.700
excitement and a little bit of hatred proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses see the roses
00:19:26.100
only in theaters august 29th get tickets now anyway both uh trump and musk were very pro-nuclear power
00:19:35.300
as an energy need of the future uh they had an interesting back and forth about climate change
00:19:42.100
um i would i would say that musk he did a really good job of explaining his view on climate change
00:19:50.180
and i heard something i've never heard before so generally speaking musk thinks that you know we
00:19:55.300
don't want to be radically getting rid of our fossil fuels because first of all we have enough time
00:20:01.620
probably to transition and survive any climate changes if there are but he also thinks that uh
00:20:09.700
you know we should be leaning hard in the direction of of alternate sources he thinks solar will be the
00:20:15.780
dominant source of energy at some point in the future i think that depends entirely upon how quickly
00:20:21.460
you build nuclear power plants but he he has a he has an interest in solar because it's part of his
00:20:28.580
business so i wouldn't take it too seriously when somebody who sells solar says solar might be the
00:20:35.620
primary source of energy in the future i'm not quite sold on that but you understand the context he's a
00:20:41.940
person in that in that industry and he might be right by the way that i'm not saying he's wrong um
00:20:49.780
but one of the things that musk added that i never heard is that if your co2 reaches a certain level
00:20:55.380
it becomes hard to breathe have you ever heard that why is that the first time i've ever heard that
00:21:03.140
that and he doesn't think we're especially close to that level but you know maybe in the 50 100 year
00:21:10.580
range we might have some noticeable difference in our breathing that would be pretty scary
00:21:16.180
so i've never heard that before um what i did think is that uh i heard people say that it's amazing how
00:21:27.300
trump could speak on every topic and what i thought is that he can bullshit on every topic
00:21:35.300
one of the things that trump does well is something that i always recommend to other people if they want
00:21:40.740
to learn how to bullshit better if there's any complicated topic let's say ai and you want to
00:21:47.380
you know you're going to be in conversations about it in the case of trump he knows he's going to be
00:21:51.620
interviewed you only need to learn a couple things and then you make sure that you put those things into
00:21:58.180
your limited conversation time and it will sound like you know more than you know so trump does this
00:22:03.940
with ai he says you know ai could double the amount of uh power we need now i don't know
00:22:13.300
will it i mean i i think he's directionally correct about that but that doesn't take really an expert
00:22:21.940
that's just a headline you read once oh ai will double our energy need but it's so smart when trump
00:22:29.860
uh lays down a little fact like that because first of all it's probably the most important fact you know
00:22:35.380
other than the ai existential threat itself that we all know but not everybody knows that the power draw
00:22:42.260
will be not just a lot but like oh my god a lot like i don't know if we can do it a lot like crazy a lot
00:22:51.780
and the fact that trump knows that and puts it out there first uh first of all choose up the time that
00:22:58.420
you might have talked about ai and when you're done you think well that trump he's he's pretty
00:23:03.860
plugged in he knew that important fact about ai it might be the only fact he knows now i'm exaggerating
00:23:11.540
i mean i'm sure he knows nvidia is making the chips and he knows that it's the most important
00:23:15.780
thing for the future and he knows china is trying to catch up you know basic stuff but when he throws
00:23:20.740
in that little thing about energy it just makes him look like he's a little bit more plugged in than
00:23:24.580
he probably is which is good technique so yes trump can on basically every topic because he does this
00:23:33.780
trick he finds that one little nugget of knowledge that makes him look like he's dug in and then he
00:23:40.180
gives it to you and he fills up all the time and then like wow he could talk about anything so it's a
00:23:47.380
good uh communication and political technique we don't know how deep he can go um then uh musk pitched
00:23:55.940
an idea which in some ways makes me think that was his primary purpose for doing this but uh musk said
00:24:02.020
uh i think it would be great to have a government efficiency commission that ensures that the taxpayer
00:24:08.340
money the taxpayers hardening money is spent in a good way and then musk said i'd be happy to help
00:24:13.780
out on such a commission now he pitched it two or three times and i think the first one or two times
00:24:23.700
trump just sort of ignored it and said what he wanted to say and so elon circled back to it and you
00:24:32.100
know made sure that he got a response on it and trump's response was uh i'd love it uh you know well
00:24:38.100
you're the greatest cutter and he's talked about how elon musk has cut expenses in his own companies
00:24:46.180
um i did not get the sense that trump loved the idea and thought it had potential i got the sense
00:24:54.020
that he was politely talking to somebody who was offering a service and you you know you never want
00:25:00.100
to say no to that especially your your host who has invited you onto his platform so to me it looked
00:25:06.180
like a polite answer but did not indicate any real interest in pursuing it so i think it sort of died
00:25:15.380
from neglect that day and the other possibility is that trump is in political mode where he should be
00:25:25.620
and he knows that if he starts making talking about cuts or even starts talking about having a commission
00:25:33.380
with musk on it to talk about cuts that's that the democrats would say what will the democrats say
00:25:41.460
the democrats would immediately turn that into um elon musk is helping trump cut vital social services
00:25:51.860
which nobody said but they could easily spin it into that so i think trump was uh politically astute
00:26:00.100
enough to know that agreeing on you know unambiguously yes we'll we'll form this commission you can be on
00:26:07.140
it uh that would list that would sound like you're all losing your jobs in the government and your social
00:26:13.700
security will get cut doesn't mean any of that would be true but that's how it would get spun so i think
00:26:21.300
maybe trump's instinct to hit a light touch on that the the question about that commission should only be
00:26:31.060
discussed after he's elected and he doesn't have to get elected again then you've got something you know
00:26:38.820
give me a lame duck uh lame duck trump with an efficiency commission where he'll never have to run for office
00:26:47.060
again oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah i want that i want a lot of that but before the election maybe maybe maybe
00:26:57.380
just a light touch on that just just to sort of suggest that you might be somewhat interested a little bit
00:27:07.220
anyway the propaganda networks like msnbc uh they just want to talk about all the times that
00:27:13.540
uh musk has posted untrue things and on the list of untrue things where these are unambiguously
00:27:21.060
untrue things that musk has in the past said on the x platform which proves that the x platform
00:27:26.740
cannot be trusted with anything honest says the msnbc person he actually says that the immigration
00:27:36.340
current immigration is to replace voters the voter replacement theory
00:27:43.540
so that was their example of something that musk has said that is unambiguously
00:27:47.780
not true um i think it's observably true i think it's the most obviously observably true thing
00:28:00.900
you've ever seen in america how in the world is this not true
00:28:04.980
uh i believe we have people on the record saying that they have that it's it benefits the uh the
00:28:15.300
census you know you might get more representation in blue areas if they're just more population there
00:28:21.780
um clearly they're being registered to vote clearly the democrats have rejected any uh legislation that would
00:28:31.220
deny them the right to vote meaning the people were non-citizens
00:28:36.660
i would say it's the most objectively obviously true thing in american history
00:28:42.820
now there might be other reasons that people are in favor of unrestricted or relatively unrestricted
00:28:49.620
immigration but clearly the voting part is part of it i mean i i can't think of anything that's more
00:28:57.140
obviously true and what would be the argument that is not true i mean the numbers are the numbers and
00:29:04.660
they do get mailing uh they get mail-in ballots so some would say it's so they can vote others would
00:29:11.940
say it's so they can harvest the the ballots that the uh non-citizens were never planning to use
00:29:20.100
but now that they have them they can fill somebody else can fill them out mail them in who knows um
00:29:27.700
but of course the uh the eu uh one of their officials uh this theory you breton guy or teary breton or
00:29:37.380
tyree breton or tyrant breton i don't know how to say his name but he settled sent this big official
00:29:43.860
looking letter to elon musk before the conversation with trump and it was a big bureaucratic letter i
00:29:52.100
could barely get through but the idea was that the european union is watching the x platform because
00:29:59.940
they think it's a disinformation spreader and maybe you know dangerous different disinformation that could
00:30:06.900
make things violent and they warned that conversation with trump might be more of that
00:30:14.820
and could certainly work against x's interests of staying in business now imagine that now what was
00:30:23.300
musk's uh response to that uh something like shove it up your ass but there was certainly nothing on the
00:30:31.220
um conversation with trump that is even slightly dangerous i didn't see it i didn't hear anything
00:30:39.220
dangerous but misinformation is what every conversation with every politician is
00:30:47.940
do they imagine that if if uh harris had been the the person who by the way is invited
00:30:53.700
so musk made sure that kamala harris has the same opportunity
00:30:56.900
um but every politician lies pretty much every time they go on television
00:31:04.980
in ways that everybody can tell so what is the european union going to do about the fact that
00:31:10.500
every politician lies every time they're on television or any time they're recorded
00:31:20.660
uh this seems to be the way that uh the american spooks are controlling european entities to control
00:31:31.220
american politics so musk is the only one holding out against incredible pressure and i imagine this
00:31:39.060
is going to get really expensive for him he might even use lose the european market entirely
00:31:46.660
so the european union i don't know i think the united states should threaten them but of course our
00:31:54.020
government is on their side if i were president trump let's say he gets elected if that happened
00:32:01.460
i think we would have to tell the european union that if they censor us if they try to censor
00:32:07.620
american free speech that will remove all funding from nato too strong
00:32:15.940
uh i i don't see any scenario in which i would protect europe while they're removing our free speech
00:32:22.420
let me say that directly there's no scenario in which i would be willing to protect europe
00:32:28.820
from anything if they're actively trying to suppress free speech in my country
00:32:34.420
no if you're attacking my country i'm gonna side with russia
00:32:38.260
sorry russia is not attacking my country but europe is that this is a this is an attack on my basic freedoms
00:32:50.260
so if europe isn't attacking me and russia is not even though russia has a pretty good reason to attack
00:32:56.660
and they're not is it wrong that i would side with russia
00:33:00.900
now i'm being a little hyperbolic of course when you take this out of context somebody will take it
00:33:07.460
out of context this is hyperbole right uh but you need to take it seriously uh i'm not so sure this
00:33:17.940
wasting money on nato makes sense when europe is attacking the united states period that's how seriously
00:33:25.460
i take it i would i would say we're just going to cut all your funding and we'll just make sure that
00:33:30.180
the united states can close its borders and you know good luck you're lost
00:33:37.540
anyway again that's hyperbole obviously we would prefer a strong relationship with europe
00:33:42.420
uh the washington post um they've got a uh so they're at the white house presser the washington
00:33:53.060
posts uh cleave woodson he's a reporter i guess and he said this he said uh elon musk is slated to
00:34:00.500
interview uh donald trump tomorrow night so this is ahead of the event and he said i don't know if the
00:34:08.340
president is going to uh feel free to say if he is or not but i i think that's misinformation on twitter
00:34:16.420
is not just a campaign issue it's a you know it's a america issue what role does the white house or the
00:34:23.460
president have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that sort of inter intervening in that
00:34:31.140
some of what was about campaign and misinformation but you know it's a wider thing right
00:34:47.060
but you're terrible people so you're going to say it
00:34:51.460
this is massively incompetent in public massively incompetent how in the world did this guy get a job
00:35:01.540
anything anything anything now would i be would i be mocking him if he were a white man yes yes
00:35:13.700
he appears to be incompetent at his basic job and he's suggesting that the white house should end
00:35:19.620
free speech if they don't like it because uh because trump might say something that's misinformation
00:35:24.260
misinformation as if kamala harris and joe biden have never said anything that's misinformation
00:35:29.620
how in the world did this guy get a job are you freaking kidding me now remember my um
00:35:38.420
my uh prediction that if you've got a woke company and they have to do the dei thing
00:35:44.580
and they're just not enough people in the pool of people that they have to pick they don't stop
00:35:51.700
picking they just lower their they lower their standards until they can be diverse because that's
00:35:57.700
their highest priority washington post would be you know right at the top of the dei uh you know totem
00:36:05.060
poll so of course they've got to try extra hard and the predictable outcome is what wildly incompetent
00:36:14.420
staff now to me this looked like an example of a wildly incompetent staff
00:36:21.620
it might not be a dei problem is there any proof that he was hired because of a dei issue no
00:36:29.300
none at all but it's your first question because they have a system which guarantees incompetence
00:36:37.460
eventually and then when you see the incompetence and it's so glaringly obvious
00:36:42.820
are you going to not say well there was a thing that predicted that and it had nothing to do with
00:36:49.060
race has nothing to do with gender has nothing to do with your genes your culture has only to do with
00:36:56.340
supply and demand if there's not enough supply in the short term they're still going to hire even if
00:37:03.140
the supply is lacking they'll just lower their standards until they meet their diversity so that's
00:37:08.340
what it looks like but do we know that's what happened no no we don't
00:37:15.300
all right uh kamala harris is on the cover of uh time magazine but when time magazine asked her for
00:37:27.620
do you know why time magazine puts somebody on the cover
00:37:30.740
well partly it's you know to get eyeballs and the usual reason that a publication does anything
00:37:38.180
but here's the other reason so that they'll do an interview if time magazine says we're going to make
00:37:44.420
you the cover you're supposed to say yes to the interview that's how that works
00:37:50.260
it was like but when my little college uh invited me back after dilbert became kind of a big thing in
00:37:58.740
the 90s my college i graduated from hartwick college in oneonta new york before i went to berkeley
00:38:06.020
uh they they decided i would be named the outstone outstanding young alumnus
00:38:12.260
so i was like wow that's quite an honor and of all the people who graduated they think i'm the
00:38:19.780
outstanding one for young young people so they invited me to come give a speech they thought wow
00:38:28.740
wow what an honor i got invited to give a speech at my college and i'm going to be like a returning hero
00:38:35.060
and uh are you going to tell me what went wrong before i tell you because you all know right
00:38:43.700
because i was very young i was not wise with the ways of the world when i found out my friend got a
00:38:50.340
great deal on a wool coat from winners i started wondering is every fabulous item i see from winners
00:38:57.300
like that woman over there with the designer jeans are those from winners ooh are those beautiful gold
00:39:03.140
earrings did she pay full price or that leather tote or that cashmere sweater or those knee-high boots
00:39:08.980
that dress that jacket those shoes is anyone paying full price for anything stop wondering
00:39:15.700
start winning winners find fabulous for less the reason that they name you the outstanding young
00:39:22.580
alumnus is they think that they can get more money out of you if they name you the outstanding young
00:39:27.780
alumnus it's just a fundraising thing has nothing to do with any respect they had for
00:39:33.060
you as a graduate so i was so dumb i flew all the way to new york to give this little speech that
00:39:41.060
nobody listened to and it was all just to basically you rope me in and turn me into a massive donor and
00:39:48.420
the whole thing was just ridiculous so i never fell for that again were there other organizations that said
00:39:56.660
hey we'd like to give you an award yes there were do you know how i handled those no thanks oh but um
00:40:06.100
maybe you don't understand we we have this prestigious award and we just voted to give it to you
00:40:13.220
so that's why we're inviting you to come speak because it's a big honor for you and i would say that's great
00:40:20.660
no thanks so that's why i handed it in the future anyway so kamala was on the cover of time magazine
00:40:28.420
and she still said no which tells you that their strategy of keeping you from hearing anything that
00:40:34.580
she says spontaneously that she's not reading is still in play and i'm gonna say again
00:40:41.940
it's brilliant yeah the the longer they go without you hearing her make a mistake the longer you'll
00:40:51.140
think that any mistake she makes is just some kind of weird oddity and nothing you need to take too
00:40:56.820
seriously it's like oh maybe she just had a bad day so but if she came out of the gate you know
00:41:03.780
blathering and cackling and acting like her usual self you would say well why did we pick her
00:41:10.580
they just have to keep you quiet for a month without hearing well keep her quiet from a month in terms of
00:41:17.220
spontaneous challenging interviews and you will form strong opinions her supporters will that will not
00:41:24.980
be changed if she says something in public that doesn't sound too good i hate that this is such a good
00:41:32.980
strategy it shouldn't work you know in the world that you want to live in having your candidate not
00:41:41.300
talk in any challenging situation should be the last thing that you would look to as something you
00:41:47.220
would support you think even democrats would say all right all right look you know you had biden
00:41:52.980
who couldn't talk to anybody you replace you replace him with harris who can't have a conversation and
00:41:59.460
you want me to vote for that you're asking me to vote for the second candidate in a row who can't talk in
00:42:05.860
public the most basic thing a president needs to do you think that all common sense says that they'd be
00:42:13.300
out like well i'm out but if they're out trump wins and they can't abide that so they're gonna twist their
00:42:22.100
brains into whatever pretzels they need them to be so they can say she's great and not hearing from
00:42:28.740
her in a spontaneous way for a month is really good strategy for that they might also be coaching her
00:42:36.740
to see if they can get her to be you know more coherent in public meanwhile uh the kamala hq account
00:42:47.060
which i think is an official account of the harris campaign um they posted this seven years ago today
00:42:55.860
white supremacists and neo-nazis marched on charlottesville chanting racist and anti-semitic
00:43:01.140
bile and killing an innocent woman this is who donald trump calls quote very fine people
00:43:09.060
now i would like to suggest that republicans use the following standard now that snopes has debunked it and
00:43:16.580
by the way the trump war room that's a also an official account um said of it it's a lie that has been so
00:43:24.900
thoroughly and exhaustively debunked that repeating it insults the intelligence of the american people
00:43:31.060
every time anyone gets fact well this was me sorry here's my opinion anytime a republican gets fact
00:43:40.020
checked they should ask the entity that did the fact checking to fact check the fine people hoax
00:43:48.100
and i would use that as the key to help democrats understand which fake news is fake so if i were
00:43:56.580
interviewed and somebody says you know president trump said 15 things that are not true what do you say
00:44:02.020
about that i would say did your network debunk the fine people hoax or did it report it like it was true
00:44:10.820
well we're not talking about me we're talking about president trump i know but you're the one who's
00:44:16.260
judging whether he told the truth we'd like to see if you're good at judging who tells the truth
00:44:21.940
do you believe that he once said that neo-nazis are fine people well it's not about me it's a no
00:44:29.300
it is about you you're the one who's judging who's telling the truth can you judge the simplest most
00:44:36.500
debunked hoax the most important and dangerous one in ever american history did you tell your audience
00:44:43.540
that that none of that was true because biden ran an entire campaign on it did you ever mention that
00:44:48.900
it wasn't true well keep stop trying to change the subject to me it's not about it's not no it is about
00:44:55.380
you it's very much about you that's what i would do if i were a republican i wouldn't let anybody do
00:45:02.500
any fact checking if they're not willing to fact check that all right uh axios which we
00:45:15.140
i would say uh i wouldn't consider that an objective source of news let's put it that way
00:45:20.820
but they're reporting that crime was lower under biden than under trump but one of the trump
00:45:28.020
communication guys on the campaign dylan johnson tries to clear that up on x with the post so he
00:45:34.900
says so it may be true that in some cities some categories of violent crime are lower for the first
00:45:40.740
six months of 2024 compared to 2023 but violent crime is still way up compared to 2019 under trump
00:45:50.580
now let me tell you how people report fake statistics first of all all data is wrong
00:45:59.380
you know i i'll tell you that a million more times because you don't believe it yet you still think i
00:46:05.140
don't mean that you still think that's hyperbole don't you when i say all data is wrong all data is
00:46:11.940
wrong because there's always somebody who has a financial interest in presenting it otherwise you would never hear
00:46:17.860
it the only data you ever hear is data that someone who's collecting the data the same person who's in
00:46:26.900
charge of collecting it and presenting it has a financial interest or it could be a political interest
00:46:32.820
but that you know translates into financial as well so there's no such thing as just data
00:46:39.620
and there never will be there can't be because they're it's all collected by liars with financial
00:46:47.540
or political interest and those people have no incentive whatsoever to tell you the truth
00:46:52.660
they tell you some shaded version of the truth here's how you do it if there happened to be a pandemic
00:46:59.300
that happened during trump's administration and you know the pandemic itself was the reason that crime
00:47:05.540
went through the roof what you do is you pick the highest point of the pandemic which had not a lot
00:47:10.740
to do with trump's administration in terms of the crime and then you say well after the pandemic when
00:47:16.900
it was totally over crime's lower under biden so therefore logically biden's better on crime
00:47:24.020
because at the height of the pandemic there was more crime but as dylan johnson points out
00:47:32.580
a more reasonable comparison would be the normal the last normal year of trump 2019 compared to the
00:47:39.940
most recent normal year of biden if you compare their normal year to normal year uh things are worse
00:47:47.460
not better now i this is the same trick that stock funds use if somebody has a managed stock fund and
00:47:57.780
they say give me your money and i'll take some of your money but i'll invest the rest and you'll
00:48:03.220
make lots of money because i'm so good at investing and you as a consumer say how do i know you're good
00:48:08.100
at investing and they say well look at my statistics if you look at the if you look at from this quarter
00:48:15.140
to this quarter we were in the top 10 of all investing companies and then if you were to check their
00:48:22.100
numbers they would be that would be right and you'd say to yourself wow they did really kill the average
00:48:28.260
during that little period but guess what if you're guessing about stocks and which ones are going to
00:48:34.580
go up you should have have periods where you're way up and you beat the average periods where you're way
00:48:42.260
down and you're lower than the average and if you do a great job your your your average if you're up and
00:48:48.820
down beats the average almost no stock funds do that but they all say they do because they can all
00:48:55.540
pick a recent time when things went well for them so they say look at this period now let's say they
00:49:02.420
go five years where they didn't once beat the average what do they advertise then nothing they just don't
00:49:10.660
advertise they don't tell you what their record is when it's bad they just wait for a little period when
00:49:16.340
just by luck they had one stock that did well and they go look at how we beat everybody for this
00:49:21.700
little period so that's that's what uh the biden administration is doing with the crime data
00:49:28.660
here's a story i didn't even know was percolating but apparently there was some kind of court case in
00:49:32.980
new york where the judge issued an opinion that rfk jr's physical presence at his supposed new york place
00:49:41.300
of residence was virtually non-existent and she ruled that uh that that misrepresentation
00:49:50.180
disqualifies rfk jr from appearing on new york's general election ballot so if that doesn't get
00:49:57.780
reversed rfk jr will not appear on the new york ballot because somebody in new york said he misrepresented
00:50:05.380
his uh place of residence now keep in mind that
00:50:14.740
um his place of residence shouldn't have made any difference to the state of new york
00:50:22.420
uh how would it make a difference i can't think of how it makes a difference if you're running for
00:50:28.500
president can't you live in florida i'm pretty sure we have somebody running for president who
00:50:36.020
lives in florida so what the hell difference does it make if he misrepresented the amount of
00:50:42.500
time he spends in his new york home so they're just going to use the misrepresentation alleged
00:50:48.820
as a reason he can't be on the ballot at all i mean that doesn't even sound slightly
00:50:54.580
like the justice system working the way anybody would want it to is is there even one voter in new
00:51:00.580
york who thinks it makes sense not to have an option to vote for rfk jr because he said something about
00:51:06.500
his place of residence in new york how does anybody care about that absurd
00:51:15.860
well here's some good news um according to uh republican national committee chairman michael whatley
00:51:24.340
uh they've got 157 000 volunteers for their program to be poll watchers so that would be uh he's worked
00:51:34.660
with rnc co-chair woman lara trump now they had promised they were going to try to find a hundred
00:51:41.380
thousand recruits to volunteer for what they call their protect the vote program basically observers
00:51:59.700
now i am prepared to be very proud of republicans it's too soon to say too soon to say
00:52:10.260
but one of the things i've always liked about republicans is that they quietly do the important
00:52:15.460
things instead of yelling about unimportant things i mean everybody does that too
00:52:20.420
but republicans are kind of it's almost built into their character how about i just quietly do this
00:52:29.540
thing you remember when the shy the so-called shy trump supporters were apparently lying to pollsters
00:52:36.420
and i kept telling you i feel like that's a republican thing i think they just all quietly know what they
00:52:45.220
need to do to you know make this a surprise and then they just do it because it's important and they can
00:52:53.620
so they do and it looks like maybe that's what happened but here's a case where i think republicans
00:53:02.740
really really understand that you're going to need a lot of observers that's not going to stop every
00:53:09.220
form of potential fraud but it's really really really important so what happens when republicans
00:53:16.980
know something's really important like not a joke like not hyperbole not politics just really basic
00:53:26.180
and important they show up here it is tried to get 100 000 got 157 000 so far like where is it going to
00:53:36.340
end do they have a they have an upper limit i don't even know maybe maybe there's too many but no republicans
00:53:43.380
are saying very clearly we don't trust this election tell me what to do and then laura trump and
00:53:49.780
uh michael watley tell them what to do and then they do it good job so if this turns out to be the key
00:54:01.220
and if it makes a difference in the election in a positive way or even if they find some you know
00:54:06.900
big discrepancy that wouldn't have been found before i'm just going to be really impressed
00:54:13.300
because you know we live in a country where you don't expect things to work you know we just stopped
00:54:18.020
expecting basic competence but this is starting to shape up like a pocket of high competence in a
00:54:27.220
world where that's rare now i told you that laura trump in particular is a wild card in the election
00:54:35.780
i think she's just so capable and you're working with uh uh whatley um and of course he gets credit as
00:54:43.380
well uh this might make a big difference now i'll re-up my idea that there should be a bounty or a
00:54:50.820
payment for whistleblowers so that anybody who sees something wrong with the election can come forward
00:54:56.420
and get a big payment but importantly that that should be introduced before the election you don't
00:55:06.020
want to introduce that idea after the election you want to do it before and here's why
00:55:12.100
almost every form of cheating has at least one accomplice you want everybody to look at their
00:55:18.180
accomplice and say okay we're getting paid a thousand dollars to do this whatever it is hypothetically
00:55:27.780
but you'll make a million dollars if you turn me in so if you turn me in
00:55:33.140
you'll probably get some amnesty and a million dollars i will just go to jail
00:55:41.860
so it's going to be kind of hard to find an accomplice that you trust because if you're
00:55:46.580
doing this at all you're both criminals do you trust criminals a criminal who could make a million
00:55:53.460
dollars and they're already they're already violating a major law for a thousand dollars
00:56:00.980
of course they take the million to turn you in and put you in jail of course they would
00:56:05.540
so you could completely disrupt their operation
00:56:09.940
by making sure that the whistleblowers know that they could get paid after the election
00:56:16.020
that's how i'd play it claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament i've been visualizing my
00:56:21.220
match all week she was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car
00:56:26.500
on her backhand side good thing claudia's with intact the insurer with the largest network of
00:56:32.420
auto service centers in the country everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her
00:56:37.060
way in a rental car in no time i made it to my tournament and lost in the first round but you
00:56:42.900
got there on time intact insurance your auto service ace certain conditions apply here's some
00:56:50.740
important news about russia according to the financial times russia has trained its navy uh-oh
00:56:56.660
they're training its navy to target sites deep within europe with nuclear capable missiles
00:57:02.260
in a potential conflict with nato wait are you telling me that russia had never thought
00:57:12.820
of training their navy had to target their potential enemy i feel like that's basic
00:57:21.220
i feel like this is a story that's a non-story is this just to make us feel bad about russia
00:57:26.820
i mean this this is kind of the story where i say to myself didn't a hundred percent of you know
00:57:33.380
that everybody with nuclear weapons is training their side to target their potential enemies
00:57:41.620
there's literally no news here it just makes you feel a certain way which makes me think it's just
00:57:47.860
propaganda here's something fun uh the atlanta journal constitution one of atlanta's papers
00:57:56.820
maybe the only one uh they had this headline with a with a subtitle not too long ago
00:58:04.740
and the headline was this reinvestigation of fulton's 2020 election ordered by georgia election
00:58:11.860
board and then the sub subheading was uh fraud hasn't been found but republican majority demands the
00:58:20.260
answer oh man those damn republicans am i right there's no fraud found and they're still demanding
00:58:29.700
some kind of action because you know they just can't let it go they just love those republicans so
00:58:36.420
so doubtful so distrustful there's no fraud but oh wait it turns out they had to update their subtitle
00:58:47.620
because uh the fraud had been found so here's the revised they revised their subtitle on the headline
00:58:56.020
to republican majority on state election board seeks further inquiry of double counted votes
00:59:02.660
because it's a fact that there were double counted votes
00:59:19.060
and you see the first headline fraud hasn't been found but those damn republicans keep asking for
00:59:25.380
for investigations you would say you know my msnbc told me this back in 2020 that everything was fine
00:59:37.700
but what if you knew that there definitely were double counted votes does that change how you think
00:59:44.820
about any of this well here's the thing people uh there might be some cases i guess they'll find out
00:59:54.900
in which some some votes might have been double counted maybe they ran something through the machine
01:00:00.580
more than once maybe but at least we can trust that once things get into the machines whether it's the vote
01:00:08.420
or the ballot uh that everything's good once it gets in the machines right because we've been told that we
01:00:16.420
have very secure systems the the election machines and the ballot counting machines all very secure very secure
01:00:26.660
next story uh politico is writing an article um about there there was a hackers convention
01:00:35.780
in which at least part of one part of it is they take a bunch of machines that are used currently in elections
01:00:43.460
and then they see if the hackers who are gathered can hack them but thank goodness our elections have
01:00:50.580
machines that can't be hacked and if in the unlikely event that somebody found a problem with one
01:00:58.100
well they would immediately fix it right i mean even if a hacker did get in the information
01:01:04.900
would be given to the company the company would say whoa we didn't know about that but we'll
01:01:09.460
we'll put a update patch in there and we'll take care of that right away right wait right no no what
01:01:20.580
in the comments i'm saying you don't think that would happen you don't think if the in the rarest
01:01:26.980
case a hacker found some problem you don't think the company would just immediately plug that hole
01:01:33.300
because there's an election coming well here's what actually happened turns out that all of the
01:01:40.180
machines uh well i don't know if it was all of them uh vulnerabilities were found uh quote
01:01:48.100
particularly troubling during the election year quote they found vulnerabilities in everything and
01:01:54.500
everything is in all caps they found vulnerabilities in everything from voting machines to e-poll books
01:02:03.300
everything everything in all caps every single technological part of our elections was hacked
01:02:12.340
for practice for fun just to see if they could do it every single electronic device got hacked by this
01:02:23.060
so but at least as i'm saying we got we have months until the election so now that they've compiled
01:02:32.420
all these hacks they give them to the companies the companies quickly issue a
01:02:38.660
oh that's not happening why not why wouldn't they just patch all the machines it's just software
01:02:45.940
well turns out there's not enough time turns out that any kind of a change that would plug those holes
01:02:55.540
would be a fairly comprehensive change and it's not the sort of thing you could expect any company could
01:03:02.340
pull off and have everything updated by november so you know what they're going to do instead
01:03:17.060
they're going to hold the election after the hackers have i assume published where all the vulnerabilities are
01:03:25.460
this doesn't even sound real does it i saw on uh i think it was the uh george account george is
01:03:36.420
the user on x who's got a real good account you should follow george um but he found the article in politico
01:03:46.020
and you know posted about it but it wasn't a link so i thought i'll go to politico this looks like the
01:03:52.100
biggest story in the country so i go to the front page i'm like what george is pretty reliable and he
01:04:00.340
says politico has this big story about the election machines not being uh completely secure and i thought
01:04:08.420
oh i don't see it so i actually had to do a search on politico you know like with search terms and then
01:04:16.100
it came up so it wasn't a wasn't on the top page when i looked for it but there it was and uh here's
01:04:24.100
one of the quotes from one of the people involved somebody named hursty so this is somebody involved
01:04:31.460
in the the hacker thing i don't know if he was a hacker himself but he says quote if you don't think
01:04:36.260
this kind of place now what he what he means is the hackers had their own room where just the hackers and
01:04:43.300
the machines were so they had access to all the machines because they're all in the same room
01:04:48.020
he says if you don't think this kind of place is running 24 7 in china russia you're kidding
01:04:54.180
yourselves hursty said gesturing around the room of voting equipment we are here only oh my god
01:05:02.980
i can barely read this this is so so insane he goes quote we are here only for two and a half days
01:05:10.820
and we find stuff it would be stupid to assume that the adversaries don't have absolute access to
01:05:26.260
so that's somebody who knows what he's talking about he's in the room with the equipment in the room
01:05:31.060
with the hackers he's all the way in and he says it would be stupid to assume that the adversaries
01:05:46.580
and they were testing to see if they could change the vote count without getting caught yup
01:05:55.460
why are we even having an election this doesn't make sense unless somebody has a counter to this i
01:06:03.060
don't know what it would be i mean they you know sometimes the counter is um the hackers used the
01:06:08.900
old versions of the software so it could be that it could be that they just didn't have access to the
01:06:16.340
brightest newest software and maybe they found some things that are already fixed that could be so i
01:06:21.220
i would wait for the other side there might be another side to this story
01:06:26.740
but remember when uh was it uh christopher ray head of the fbi uh give me a fact check on this but my
01:06:35.140
by memory i believe he suggested that china at the very least was already inside all of our most secure
01:06:43.620
infrastructure systems in the united states and the fact that they haven't crashed them
01:06:49.620
is only because they would worry about retaliation not because they couldn't
01:06:55.940
now if christopher ray says he is sure without having proof that china is inside all of our or most of
01:07:03.700
our infrastructure systems don't you think that means that america is inside their infrastructure
01:07:10.340
systems do you do you think that the fbi would tell you that our adversaries can get into all of our
01:07:16.500
systems and yet it would not be true that with our superior hackers at least that's what we're told
01:07:25.540
that we wouldn't be in our adversary systems to at least have a reply in case they try to crash something
01:07:33.460
doesn't that mean that our own internal intelligence people would also have full access to our systems
01:07:40.660
and aren't they the very same people who try to take over governments in other places it's sort of
01:07:48.260
their job the cia to make sure that friendly governments get installed in other countries
01:07:54.020
we've done it 80 different coups or something like that do you think that they wouldn't try to keep this
01:08:00.820
terrible populist end of office with a couple tweaks how would you know so let's see they would have the
01:08:09.780
the ability they would have the incentive and they would have very low chance of getting caught and
01:08:20.660
under those conditions how often does bad stuff happen they can do it easily they have a really
01:08:31.220
really high reason to do it like that they believe in their soul like they're saving america or saving
01:08:36.900
their own jobs like important stuff you know the the anti-trumpers in their minds it's the most important
01:08:42.980
thing in the world he's hitler he's gonna destroy everything you know and love so you have the highest level
01:08:55.620
and all the time in the world under what conditions does it not happen i can't think of any
01:09:04.820
i can't think of any situation in which that would not result in a rigged election like i can't even
01:09:10.660
think of a hypothetical what would what would the hypothetical look like it would look like this uh bob you
01:09:17.940
know we're gonna rig this election because we've got to save the country against this existential threat
01:09:23.300
called trump then bob says well i would have been on board yesterday but i had a near-death experience
01:09:31.780
and i talked to god in person and now i cannot lie well maybe but look how far you have to reach
01:09:39.940
to come with any scenario in which the election is not rigged that makes sense now i suppose if you
01:09:48.420
had a near-death experience and turned into a whistleblower and they didn't murder you right there
01:09:53.460
because they could i guess in some weird you know unlikely situation we could have a clean election
01:10:02.660
but the the design of the system largely guarantees it now when i say the design of the system
01:10:11.300
i don't just mean the election system i mean design of america as a system because right now the news
01:10:18.260
is telling us that hitler might come to office and get re-elected we didn't notice he was hitler the
01:10:24.020
first time first four years we didn't notice it's just so crazy but um i don't know it's kind of tough
01:10:33.060
to uh it's tough to feel that the election would be true so i'm going to double down on my prediction
01:10:41.700
i don't think that the outcome no matter what it is no matter which way it goes the election i don't
01:10:46.820
think it will be trusted by the people who lose so if democrats lose they'll think it's rigged one way
01:10:53.140
or the other and vice versa so i don't know how we're going to have a transfer of power
01:11:09.700
bank more encores when you switch to a scotia bank banking package
01:11:13.140
learn more at scotia bank.com slash banking packages conditions apply scotia bank you're
01:11:24.180
wow according to george the one i was talking about he says uh breaking thousands of british
01:11:30.420
patriots gathered in london to support trump saying his victory is needed across the world wow
01:11:38.260
uh huh i don't know if thousands is enough i mean thousands isn't is not a lot but uh we'll see
01:11:52.500
all right uh there's some uh documents according to the daily wire some documents have been found
01:11:57.940
they explain how the soros network not only uh funds candidates to get them in office you know
01:12:04.420
the attorney generals etc but after it gets them in office apparently it stays connected to them and
01:12:12.500
sort of keeps training them and influencing them so it's not just that soros gets people that think
01:12:19.700
like him in office once in office they have a formal way to continue influencing them because of course
01:12:27.380
they'd like to stay in office and they'd like to get funded for their next campaign so basically soros has
01:12:32.980
found a way to simply buy uh local officials and they spent 117 million since 2016 to reshape america's
01:12:44.100
justice system uh three in ten americans now live under a soros prosecutor i'm one of them
01:12:54.180
and that these uh prosecutors uh continue to be told what to do by the people who fund them now
01:13:03.220
i learned something the other day about my local area not my specific town but there's a town nearby
01:13:11.220
where apparently the soros slash act blue money is going to put a bad character in the mayor's job
01:13:20.820
and here's what i just realized soros is doing certainly he gets a fast bang for the buck by controlling the
01:13:30.980
um the justice system and that's a pretty big lever but there's a bigger lever coming which is if you can
01:13:40.180
buy uh a victory in the mayor's office in every middle or large city or most of them those become the
01:13:51.300
people who eventually go from mayor to let's say a state senator to let's say a representative to let's
01:13:58.260
say a senator to let's say a president so in other words soros and act blue are creating a pool of
01:14:08.420
experienced people who will be the leaders of tomorrow but they're starting them at the lower
01:14:14.340
level where it's cheap so so you can get ownership of them at the mayor level and then you continue
01:14:21.220
you you know continue funding them if they go to higher office you make sure that the best ones do
01:14:27.300
that so the level of control that soros is putting on the country is way bigger than you imagine and
01:14:38.180
it's destroying a town local to me now i don't want to give you details because i'll get in trouble but
01:14:45.380
i've heard some really really bad things about the local politics and about act blue and soros's influence
01:14:52.580
and don't ignore that because that might be the long-range biggest play
01:14:59.460
according to the hill there was a poll that showed that even republicans like the biden suggested
01:15:07.460
supreme court reforms does that surprise you that even republicans like all three of the
01:15:16.260
these supported reforms now there's a there's a punchline to this so wait to the end
01:15:22.180
but the reforms are these um a constant let's see they want a uh
01:15:28.580
they want a term limits 51 of even republicans like that now in each case the democrats like it more
01:15:38.500
but even 51 of republicans said yeah term limits for the supreme court i could go for that uh the binding
01:15:46.740
code of conduct on the supreme court members 70 of republicans said yeah go to conduct totally
01:15:56.740
reasonable why not and then on the uh the uh let's say um saying that nobody's above the law i guess not
01:16:08.580
the president and not the supreme court 54 of republicans said yeah nobody's above the law makes sense
01:16:17.220
now here's what you don't know about how the poll was conducted
01:16:20.580
they didn't tell the people they asked whose ideas these were so in other words the republicans were
01:16:30.500
not presented with this joe biden would like to do this do you agree instead they said what do you
01:16:38.260
think of the idea of term limits and apparently they i don't know if they vetted them but they they
01:16:44.900
may have found people who just weren't up with the news if you just came up to anybody and said what
01:16:50.100
do you think about term limits on supreme court if they didn't know where it came from i could see
01:16:56.740
why the majority would say yeah you know on paper that sounds pretty good but this is a another example
01:17:03.460
of the phenomenon which has been tested many times if you took um trump's policies and simply said that
01:17:12.340
they were kamala harris's policies and stopped a democrat on the street and said um kamala harris
01:17:19.060
would like to tighten the border and uh do this or that even the democrat would say kamala harris wants
01:17:26.340
to do it i'm all on board and then if you if you go you can basically do this over and over people will
01:17:35.220
agree if they think their team says it's a good idea and if you don't tell them which team has the idea
01:17:41.140
then you get something a little closer to an actual opinion but if they know who's for it it means nothing
01:17:58.100
so we also know that uh tiktokers apparently are being reportedly i suppose this could be fake news but
01:18:07.860
there are reports from influencers that the kamala harris campaign has contacted them and offered
01:18:14.580
them cash to say things supportive of kamala harris is that legal i think it is right it's legal to just say
01:18:24.900
i'll pay you to say good things about our candidate or is it i think it's legal i mean
01:18:32.740
kind of sketchy but i think it's legal but uh the idea is that you should not trust any celebrity
01:18:40.180
endorsements whatsoever a tick tocker said that she was contacted i guess she decided not to do it
01:18:48.420
but wanted you to know that these influencers are paid i saw a headline that said that there was a study
01:18:56.340
that tick tock is not as negative toward china as other platforms
01:19:05.060
is anybody surprised that tick tock which is owned by china but they don't touch the algorithm trust us
01:19:12.420
trust us we're not going to put our finger on the algorithm it's just whatever the people want and
01:19:17.940
and then then then a test shows that tick tock is way friendlier to china than the other platforms
01:19:27.700
just a coincidence i doubt it it's probably exactly what it looks like
01:19:34.260
there's a study in science psychology post or something that they did a twin study to see what
01:19:41.300
would cause shifts in political ideology and here's what they found that apparently your genetics
01:19:48.740
do have an influence over your initial political beliefs now you've seen plenty of studies about
01:19:55.780
this before that there does seem to be an actual genetic difference between liberals and conservatives
01:20:04.420
that people are just genetically conservative and genetically might have discussed about some
01:20:10.420
things that somebody else thinks is just a good time and that those are you're just born with it now
01:20:17.780
that feels right to me i believe that there is a strong propensity to you know favor one side
01:20:27.380
based on your genes but if you were to change your mind apparently the changing your mind
01:20:33.140
is influenced by your environment so if your friends change the mind and you watch different news and
01:20:39.060
maybe you move to a different town you're far more likely to change your mind on politics now all that
01:20:44.820
to me all that is is proof that brainwashing works
01:20:49.300
right if we know with twins that you can keep one twin the same and the other twin can be changed
01:20:57.140
because you change their environment basically that shows you that brainwashing works
01:21:02.100
because it's not about thinking that what this what this study did not show is that if you do a deep
01:21:09.460
dive and you do your own research you will find information that might change your mind nope it just said if
01:21:15.220
you take this one twin and put them in a different environment they end up changing their politics
01:21:20.660
even though their genes are the same as the one who stayed the same so brainwashing works
01:21:26.900
there was no appeal to the one better educated who had more facts change their mind nothing like that
01:21:32.980
they just had to be in an environment where other people had different opinions and they changed their
01:21:40.420
we are not a rational people all right youtube is testing some kind of community notes thing uh
01:21:46.660
similar to way x does it now i haven't seen it yet but um that's good news right because on x the community
01:21:55.140
notes there's a good check on somebody's uh lying or inaccuracy because uh when somebody tells a whopper
01:22:03.060
there's a pretty good chance there'll be a community note saying this is not true so if youtube were to
01:22:07.860
do the same thing that would be great wouldn't it well i'm on youtube right now so let me say this youtube is
01:22:20.340
the most wonderful company i've never known a company so wonderful as youtube they are fair and
01:22:29.220
professional and the last thing they would ever do is put their thumb on the community notes such that
01:22:36.500
is simply supported the narrative you could count on the fact that the community notes will be debunking
01:22:45.220
every reference to the fine people hoax right wait no
01:22:55.700
well i would say that youtube doing community note to fact checking is one of the most dangerous things
01:23:04.980
i've ever seen in my life could it work out positively absolutely it could if they really did take their
01:23:13.140
thumb off of the process and let let it just run out and if it's organized the way community notes are on x
01:23:20.500
where you have to get some kind of agreement or the note doesn't come you might actually have something
01:23:26.020
there however this depends entirely on youtube having an interest in the the information being accurate
01:23:37.460
versus an interest in supporting the narrative which do you think is closer to the truth that youtube's
01:23:45.380
interest is to get the most accurate information out there and get rid of the worst or to support the narrative
01:23:54.580
well i would give you this perspective if you're a big company that depends on the government's
01:23:59.940
being on the good side with the government you kind of have to do the narrative i don't think it's
01:24:07.540
optional for big companies when it was the last time a big company especially a publicly traded company
01:24:13.860
when was the last time they told you the government's narrative was wrong and you should ignore it
01:24:20.180
i don't know does it ever happen so we do have some questions about whether this would
01:24:25.220
uh remove bias or create bias but i'm going to compliment youtube for testing it you won't know
01:24:33.540
until they do it so very much like uh i have highest marks for elon musk trying a new way to get
01:24:42.180
information to people through the conversation with trump i'm going to say that whether or not this works
01:24:49.940
the community notes on youtube it is absolutely the right thing to test well we'll have a good idea
01:24:56.180
if it's working after a year or so so good on you youtube let's see what we can do fox news has reported
01:25:03.460
about a chicago teachers union uh representative uh claiming that uh standardized tests are uh racist
01:25:13.700
and uh come from junk science and white supremacy and eugenics and that's why the black kids are not
01:25:20.980
doing so well in school because tests are racist and made by white supremacists to
01:25:35.780
huh um that uh didn't go well with all of the callers there was a black mother who called in and said
01:25:43.700
um i did well on all the standardized tests and i'm pretty sure i want to raise a child who can do
01:25:50.820
well on all the standardized tests why are you telling me that black people can't do well on
01:25:56.180
standardized tests that sounds super racist i'm adding that last part the super racist part
01:26:03.700
but i do like the fact that there was a black mom who just added some black mom common sense
01:26:11.060
to the teachers union which is the most dangerous part of america right now the the teachers unions have
01:26:17.940
destroyed i think they've destroyed the country really because everything that is a problem right
01:26:25.380
now is the way people think and all that came from the school system so 20 years of the the teachers
01:26:33.140
union is destroying america and here we are anyway ontario the wait is over the gold standard of
01:26:41.460
online casinos has arrived golden nugget online casino is live bringing vegas style excitement and
01:26:47.380
a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips whether you're a seasoned player or just
01:26:52.740
starting signing up is fast and simple and in just a few clicks you can have access to our exclusive
01:26:58.340
library of the best slots and top tier table games make the most of your downtime with unbeatable
01:27:04.020
promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at golden nugget
01:27:09.940
online casino take a spin on the slots challenge yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game
01:27:15.300
to feel the thrill of real-time action all from the comfort of your own devices why settle for less when
01:27:21.060
you can go for the gold at golden nugget online casino gambling problem call connects ontario
01:27:27.300
1-866-531-2600 19 and over physically present in ontario eligibility restrictions apply see golden
01:27:34.740
nugget casino.com for details please play responsibly so china's uh huawei technologies they have some new chip
01:27:44.180
that's going to compete with nvidia's ai chip so it's a chinese made chip so they don't have to rely
01:27:50.900
on american technology because america has decided that china can't have the good chips so i think
01:27:56.900
nvidia is prevented from selling their best chips to china so china is like hell with you we'll make our
01:28:04.980
own chips um i don't think china's got chips that are quite up to nvidia's standard but who knows if they
01:28:12.900
can catch up or how long it would take but here's the interesting part so china is desperately trying to
01:28:21.140
decouple from requiring any american anything they don't want american chips they don't want american
01:28:27.940
technology they want to be able to have their own control because otherwise we'd have some ability to
01:28:33.220
suppress them by suppressing our goods but at the same time america is trying to divest from the chinese
01:28:41.300
economy by bringing manufacturing home or moving in somewhere that's not china so we're in the having the
01:28:49.620
weirdest war we're right in the middle of a like a hard war with china but without the bullet part
01:28:58.260
so the war is this if the united states can keep china addicted to our products let's say technology
01:29:06.980
but we can become unaddicted to their manufacturing and other products that we need because we get them
01:29:12.900
somewhere else then we would have power over china because we would say well you know if you don't do
01:29:19.540
this trade agreement or you don't get your ships out of the south china sea we won't sell you any
01:29:26.020
technology and good luck trying to keep the lights on meanwhile china would like to do the same thing to us
01:29:33.140
to not depend on us for any technology but make sure that we're very dependent on them for
01:29:38.740
pharmaceuticals and you know basic materials that we need to build everything so we're it's a weird war
01:29:46.420
where we're acting like friends where we're seeing who could reduce their dependence on the other
01:29:52.500
enough that you can get some kind of financial leverage on the other
01:29:58.980
does it seem to you like uh humans just like to be in wars it's like we can't help ourselves this is
01:30:07.460
why i think trump has the opportunity to be to do the biggest reframe in modern american history
01:30:14.900
and the reframe would look like this hey russia hey china you know that in the long run the big war
01:30:22.180
is going to be with islam and that we need to be on the same team because islam is going to not want
01:30:31.140
to be you know they're not going to change to chinese culture they're going to try to change you
01:30:37.460
so this would be the time to make sure that russia china and the united states are doing as well as
01:30:43.620
possible for as long as possible so that they have some ability to coordinate and protect from what will
01:30:50.500
be a very large challenge in the future which is just the population growth and
01:30:55.940
uh whatever aggressiveness there comes from the middle east so that's the way i'd play it
01:31:03.300
um and i think trump is good at that he's good at explaining that what team you should be on
01:31:10.900
and they should be on our team uh the smart people are saying there's going to be an interest rate cuts
01:31:17.140
because i guess uh the inflation went down a little bit and if inflation goes down then the fed can say
01:31:25.140
um hey we did our job and then they they can lower their interest rates if interest rates go down i
01:31:32.340
would expect the stock market to go up and uh as i've been telling people for a year you should expect
01:31:38.660
the stock market to be artificially raised right around the election uh and you know maybe it's a coincidence
01:31:47.780
maybe it's not but the people who would prefer biden to get reelected seem like they might be in the
01:31:56.340
mood to shade some numbers maybe go a little early on interest rate cuts goose that economy a little bit
01:32:04.820
make make the uh harris team look a little stronger so we'll see anyway um there's a new
01:32:15.220
i there should be a category called stupid news
01:32:23.300
so stupid news would be news that you didn't really even need to hear
01:32:27.540
to know the news like like russia uh teaching its navy to target uh europe i was like i didn't really
01:32:36.900
need to hear that because that's just basic obvious common sense well here's another one uh there's uh
01:32:45.300
more pressure to try to come up with a ceasefire in gaza all right so that's the story that there's
01:32:52.740
new movement to make a ceasefire in gaza so you say to yourself oh that's new like maybe finally
01:32:59.540
they'll get there all right here's something else that's in the story that the head of hamas uh sinwar
01:33:07.220
is his name um he said that if israel is serious about negotiation uh that first they have to stop
01:33:15.220
well that's not gonna happen so what kind of negotiation is that how about you stop doing
01:33:24.660
everything you're doing and uh that'll be just the first step but what will you do well we won't do
01:33:32.020
anything just you stop fighting us okay but usually usually there's something that you do too no no you
01:33:42.820
just have to stop your military operation that's not gonna happen so obviously hamas has no real
01:33:51.140
interest in you know stopping things and israel would probably say how about you return the hostages
01:33:58.340
and then we'll talk about slowing down the military thing how about all your leaders surrender
01:34:05.220
and you give us back all the hostages and then we'll have a conversation after that but it looks
01:34:10.580
like both sides have a requirement to begin the conversation that is the hardest thing that could
01:34:17.220
ever happen and really impossible so neither side wants peace now the people do just to be clear the the
01:34:27.380
the people who are suffering in gaza very much want a ceasefire but hamas if they wanted one they could
01:34:33.780
get one easily and if israel wanted one they would just stop fighting so if you have both sides that
01:34:41.860
prefer the fighting over the peace the leadership not the people the people might want peace but the
01:34:47.060
leadership they both want to fight so of course it's not going to stop i think hamas thinks that every
01:34:55.060
every person that israel kills in gaza gets them closer to their goal of you know disgracing israel
01:35:03.060
and having some extra power over them in the future and israel of course has to take out the garbage and
01:35:09.220
get rid of the terrorists because you can't live next to terrorists so both sides are locked into a
01:35:14.180
situation where they can't do anything different because they think they're winning in their own weird
01:35:20.420
ways so yeah nothing's gonna change there's a little update on that story about the uh the the son of
01:35:29.220
one cartel leader in mexico running some kind of a trick to bring the other cartel head uh into american
01:35:37.620
custody and america picked them up both but maybe the one guy worked a deal so maybe he'll be let
01:35:44.660
down at some point we don't know but what here's what we've heard now the the younger man
01:35:50.420
uh took hostage the the head uh cartel leader from the other cartel and he didn't just you know
01:36:00.820
trick him into flying into the wrong airport they actually uh they tied him to his chair so he was
01:36:07.540
actually you know abducted and tied up and then flown to america uh now america says that they had
01:36:14.660
nothing to do with it they didn't have the plane you know just wasn't any of their assets involved
01:36:20.420
it was just completely a mexican thing do you believe that no i don't you know if any part of
01:36:28.980
our spooks were involved in this they're supposed to say they weren't so the fact that they say they
01:36:35.860
weren't doesn't really mean anything but i would say that whatever is happening here uh the real story is
01:36:44.580
nowhere near the surface story i don't know what the real story is but everything about that story
01:36:52.740
stinks everything about it so i don't know if it's an american plot to get the two cartels to fight
01:36:59.300
each other i don't know but i don't trust any part of the story all right ladies and gentlemen i've gone
01:37:07.780
on too far i'm gonna i'm gonna say goodbye to uh youtube and um x and rumble and i'm gonna talk to my
01:37:18.260
beloved local subscribers privately in a moment the rest of you i will see you tomorrow thanks for