Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 19, 2024


Episode 2571 CWSA 08⧸19⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 38 minutes

Words per Minute

149.31323

Word Count

14,643

Sentence Count

4

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we discuss some of the most important things going on in the world right now, including the new medical technology, drones, and the future of the world, and much, much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 um good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called
00:00:08.580 coffee with scott adams and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even
00:00:14.280 understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need is a cup or mug or a glass a tank or
00:00:19.460 gels or a stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i
00:00:25.180 like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine day of the day the
00:00:30.160 thing makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it's gonna happen now damn
00:00:34.780 it join me
00:00:36.400 you know trump always talks about the liquid gold
00:00:48.460 he's talking about oil in the ground but no that coffee is the liquid gold everything else is a
00:00:57.340 bad substitute now i'd like to invite my uh drunken troll jenny uh every morning i have a drunk named
00:01:06.880 jenny who will come in and start shouting in all caps something about battery technology
00:01:13.680 because that's the most important thing to shout about every morning so we'll be waiting for that
00:01:20.360 that should happen in a minute jenny where are you drunk jenny come on all right so here's some
00:01:27.620 new things that are happening there's a new medical technology that stops bleeding like right away it's
00:01:36.040 a gel so i guess uh cresillon is the name of it and it's received fda clearance so if you're in a
00:01:44.980 trauma situation and they can't stop the bleeding apparently they can just take this gel and just slap
00:01:52.440 it on and it immediately stops the bleeding which is kind of impressive we don't like bleeding less
00:02:00.780 bleeding all right here's what else is happening that's cool okay this could be the end of human
00:02:06.700 civilization but until then how cool is this apparently there's some kind of a revolutionary quantum compass
00:02:15.420 sort of thing that could replace gps or at least be a substitute for it meaning that they have somehow
00:02:22.540 miniaturized a device which is so sensitive if i understand this correct if it knows where it starts
00:02:29.900 it'll always know where it ends up meaning that if it knows where it's starting point
00:02:35.420 it can tell that it went you know two feet in one direction and how fast and all that stuff so
00:02:42.540 apparently it's so sensitive to movement that it would replace gps
00:02:50.780 now here's the good news and the bad news the good news if you want to develop a drone
00:02:57.340 that can't be jammed in its gps well now you have the capabilities the bad news is when your enemy
00:03:05.100 wants to make a drone that you can't stop well here's the technology to do it so it could be the
00:03:13.420 end of civilization or it could be just a cool new technology so let's go with that second one
00:03:19.260 speaking of drones pentagon is allegedly trying to create what wired magazine calls a hellscape of
00:03:29.180 drones to defend taiwan so apparently we would fill the sky with drones to protect taiwan which seems to
00:03:38.540 be like the way everybody's going to protect everything eventually and also the way everybody's going to attack
00:03:44.940 everything now let me see if taiwan had all the manufacturing might of the united states blah
00:03:55.500 yeah plus taiwan to make these drones to protect taiwan but they would be going up against the entire
00:04:03.340 manufacturing base of china to hope that they had more drones and better drones than the other team
00:04:10.940 i don't know i think i'd bet on china if it's a drone war you don't think china can beat everybody
00:04:19.980 else's drones just by quantity alone i don't know but uh it's the weirdest thing that we're
00:04:30.700 why in the world are we defending taiwan
00:04:33.500 i don't really understand that like i i guess it's because we said we would because if we really
00:04:40.780 wanted just the chips all we would have to do is say to china i've got a deal for you you let us have
00:04:48.620 the chip manufacturing and you could have the island but of course we're not going to do anything so
00:04:55.900 weasley is that because there are allies or something but uh the absurdity of defending a tiny
00:05:03.500 island off of china which has a 100 chance of being part of china eventually i don't know how long it'll
00:05:11.420 take but there's not really any chance it will be independent forever it's just too close to china
00:05:17.180 there's no way that they're going to stay independent
00:05:19.260 but we wish the taiwanai taiwanese people the best so we don't want them to have a bad time of it if
00:05:27.420 they get absorbed by china but you know it feels like all china would have to do is improve their
00:05:33.180 government and taiwan would say you know what yeah that looks pretty good and make us part of that
00:05:41.740 so it's going to happen eventually might take 200 years um according to vox
00:05:50.140 people are falling in love with ai's voice you know where they have these little chat apps
00:05:56.620 now you know that i tried out one of the early ai chat apps and it just sort of didn't work that
00:06:05.580 well you know it took a while to answer and they could only answer certain things and it would forget
00:06:12.060 about you from one time you talked to it to the next and it really wasn't satisfying and still
00:06:17.900 it was kind of addictive so if there's one thing i can teach you about predicting the future
00:06:25.980 if there's a product that's bad and you still crave it
00:06:30.060 that's going to be big you know just the way cell phones were terrible at first but boy did we want
00:06:38.700 them just like fax machines if you're old enough to remember they used to be terrible that you know
00:06:45.980 the paper would get jammed up every kind of problem but the demand was through the roof so for a while
00:06:52.140 faxes were big same with computers same with everything so ai is sort of like that and these ai chat
00:06:59.820 friends are the best example of that where people already like it a lot and it's terrible i mean it's
00:07:09.420 barely a product i use chat gpt i think it fails about 60 of the time just think about that imagine
00:07:18.940 any product that fails 60 of the time i mean just anecdotally it's what it feels like to me
00:07:26.700 and that you would still crave it just imagine that it fails 60 of the time that's what it feels
00:07:33.820 like that's not any kind of you know scientific number but what i mean is you know i'll turn on the
00:07:40.380 chat part and i'll i'll try to talk to it it'll answer the first question fine and then the very next
00:07:47.340 one it acts like it doesn't know how to understand voices or anything and it's very consistent that
00:07:53.740 it doesn't work more than one or two times and then it just craps out now i guess the new version
00:07:59.020 which is already being rolled out is solving those problems so that's how a bad cell phone becomes a
00:08:06.140 good cell phone etc so the fact that i crave it in its terrible form suggests that when it's working
00:08:15.180 which is right around the corner it's going to be really big so i think the number of people falling
00:08:21.980 in love with ai is really going to be under predicted so scott will make the following prediction
00:08:31.020 whatever you think is the maximum number of people who will form a close relationship with
00:08:36.700 an artificial intelligence you're wrong it's way more than that so if you're saying to yourself well you
00:08:44.620 know and of every hundred people that can't be more than two people who would fall in love with the ai
00:08:50.700 no it may be it might be 80 percent so if you're guessing two percent i'm going to go with 80 percent
00:08:59.260 maybe not the next version but by the version after that
00:09:05.260 so big trouble there in reproduction and but maybe it answers a bunch of questions too you know maybe it
00:09:11.660 solves your uh loneliness it might maybe it solves your loneliness but it might make it worse who knows
00:09:20.860 anyway the uk is uh releasing 5 000 prisoners to make room for anti-immigration protesters
00:09:28.220 what at the end wokeness account is reporting this on x so the bbc is reporting that
00:09:36.620 uh they'll have to get rid of one person who's already in jail in other words release somebody
00:09:44.060 who was legally jailed in the uk so that they have room to put in a new person because you don't want
00:09:50.860 these anti-immigration people to just be able to get away with it because the the jails are all full
00:09:55.980 so you're gonna have to get rid of some some people who did other crimes so you can make sure that
00:10:01.100 whatever you do you get those anti-immigration protesters in there so the uk has basically
00:10:07.340 fallen i would never visit there i'm not even sure why we're their allies at this point and remember
00:10:13.180 the european union is trying to stop free speech in america so putin isn't now i'm not pro-putin
00:10:24.220 but so i'm just telling you how bad the european union is the european union is actively trying
00:10:30.220 to block x and other social media companies and make them uh make them agree to the censorship that
00:10:38.060 the europeans want on an american company and americans as well so i would say that we're under
00:10:46.940 attack by europe in a very basic way because if they're trying to take away freedom of speech in
00:10:52.940 america well you know that's taking everything because all the other stuff falls after that
00:11:01.100 so no europe i consider myself basically at war with you is that too far i mean there there's no
00:11:09.820 bullets being fired or or likely to be fired but you know if it were an economic war you'd call it a war
00:11:18.540 right if if europe tomorrow said we're going to boycott every economic thing you're doing in america
00:11:24.300 you'd call that kind of war so if they try to end our free speech which is the key to ending basically
00:11:30.860 everything in america that you like it feels like a war to me so i consider myself at war with the
00:11:40.380 european union at least um all right the democratic national conventions kicked off there are of course
00:11:49.420 mass protests from the pro-palestinian protesters rumored to be maybe a hundred thousand people will
00:11:56.940 show up i don't know but uh what would you do if you were the democrats and you have to protect
00:12:03.020 yourself from people coming from the outside who don't belong and they're going to cause trouble
00:12:09.020 well it looks like they decided that uh building walls requiring identification
00:12:16.780 and having a strong police presence are the only way to stay safe that's right
00:12:22.220 right now at first i was resisting all the people who were cleverly noting wait a minute scott
00:12:32.460 it sounds like the democrats are doing the very thing they say you shouldn't do
00:12:36.380 lots of police demanding id that's bad for people who can't get ids and probably racist and walls are
00:12:43.340 racist all the time and and i was thinking to myself well these are not you know directly
00:12:49.100 related i mean you can't say the border is the same situation as the convention
00:12:57.820 or can you the more i think about it yeah it's closer to exactly the same because here's the thing
00:13:06.060 the reason we want border security is because it's common sense it's obvious common sense the reason
00:13:14.060 the democrats want uh walls and police and ids for their their convention is it's common sense it's
00:13:23.100 obvious common sense so in that way they are exactly the same although the border and the dnc are different
00:13:29.580 but in both cases there's an obvious common sense thing to do but they only want to do it when they're
00:13:35.660 personally directly and immediately at risk if if you were at risk and the head of the dnc you know all
00:13:44.460 the if all the democrat leadership were not personally at risk they wouldn't care because they don't care
00:13:51.420 about the border enough apparently all right and i also have a question is it currently illegal to wear a mask
00:14:01.020 mask at a protest in chicago if somebody knows the answer to that because i saw a masked protester jump
00:14:09.340 on stage at the dnc and grab the microphone and yell a bunch of pro-palestinian things and do you know
00:14:16.460 what happens if you jump on stage and grab the microphone and you're wearing a mask
00:14:21.180 uh allow me to uh do an impression of the protester
00:14:35.420 it uh wasn't really effective couldn't really hear it but it turns out that when somebody is
00:14:43.420 trying to get the crowd fired up if they're wearing a mask nothing works because you couldn't
00:14:50.860 see the protesters face or mouth uh you could just see somebody standing with a microphone going
00:15:01.900 so not ideal
00:15:06.300 at gray goose we believe that pleasure is a necessity that's why we craft the world's number one premium
00:15:11.900 vodka in france using only three of the finest natural ingredients french winter wheat water from
00:15:17.820 jean sac and yeast
00:15:21.580 with gray goose we invite you to live in the moment and make time wait sip responsibly
00:15:31.260 well let's talk about the so those protesters want a ceasefire and some kind of two-state solution
00:15:37.340 probably at least some of them do um but how is that gaza ceasefire doing well anthony blinken says
00:15:45.580 you know there's a decisive moment coming up for the gaza ceasefire and uh here's a question i ask
00:15:53.260 given that gaza the situation's going on a while given that the election is coming up
00:16:01.820 given that one of the biggest problems for the democrats is these protesters
00:16:06.460 what do you think the democrats are offering to israel if israel would be willing to at least
00:16:14.460 pretend they're going to do a ceasefire until after the election
00:16:18.140 because they only need it to you know to get through the election what do you think we'd have to offer
00:16:23.340 them you imagine you're netanyahu and you know that the democrats are in a terrible bind
00:16:29.980 they really really really really need you to at least pretend that you want to ceasefire
00:16:37.980 what would you ask in return well we'll never know but are you comfortable with your with your
00:16:45.500 negotiator being in a weak position like that i don't know if this would apply to somebody like trump
00:16:53.420 but it looks to me like the democrats in the united states have put themselves in a position
00:16:59.100 where they pretty much have to do whatever netanyahu tells them to do if what they're going to get in
00:17:04.460 return is a pretend ceasefire and it would be pretend just to get through the election so i don't know that
00:17:13.260 israel has any inclination to agree to anything but unless it's fake um the wall street journal reports
00:17:23.900 that support for a two-state solution where the palestinians and israel would live side by side and
00:17:31.100 happiness used to be the most popular thing or more popular i guess and now it's not very popular at all
00:17:39.100 now only uh according to wall street journal only 32 percent of palestinians believe in a two-state
00:17:45.980 solution that would sort of mean that two-thirds of palestinians want to get rid of israel and
00:17:56.460 they don't say it out loud but i'm pretty sure the jewish population of israel they would like to get
00:18:01.820 rid of two-thirds that doesn't seem promising but what about israel
00:18:08.380 um let's see among the israeli jews belief in a peace based on two states is only at 19
00:18:18.060 so only 19 of jewish israelis are even interested in a two-state solution
00:18:26.300 now do you remember i've been telling you you could just ask me you don't really need to do polls
00:18:31.980 you didn't need to do this poll there there's not going to be a two-state solution
00:18:39.660 there's not even anywhere close to being enough interest in it in the real world it's just something
00:18:45.900 you say if you need to say it but no nobody it's it's one of the least popular ideas in all the world
00:18:53.740 it's it's pretty hard to have any kind of topic where only 19 of people are on one side i mean
00:19:03.260 almost everything else that's a controversial topic is at least 60 40 you know 40 is a good solid
00:19:12.220 minority but you know it's enough to be taken seriously but 19 and 19 i think you could just
00:19:20.220 ignore them you know once you get to that 80 20 rule you can just ignore the 20.
00:19:27.820 so no there is no realistic possibility of a two-state solution and therefore there's no real
00:19:34.060 reason that israel should stop before they have what they call total victory if if it's true that only
00:19:41.420 roughly a little more than half of the hamas fighters have been killed you know which is tough to
00:19:47.020 calculate um then they should probably have another year or so of work now am i in favor of that it
00:19:55.260 doesn't matter what i'm in favor of or not in favor of in terms of israel has no impact on anything
00:20:02.380 you know i i sometimes like to imagine that as far as domestic politics you know just stuff in the united
00:20:09.100 states that if i have a good idea where i said something that people repeated or you know i did
00:20:14.700 a post that went viral maybe i could actually make a difference change the minds and maybe maybe that
00:20:20.380 would change some policies so i have this you know small feeling that my opinion could make a difference
00:20:27.020 in the united states i mean so unlikely but it's possible but clearly my opinion has no impact on israel
00:20:35.420 so i don't have one what would the what would be the point we're just watching it's sort of like
00:20:42.380 somebody you know releases the ball and it's you know gravity is going to make it go drop in the
00:20:47.660 ground what's your opinion of that it doesn't matter once you release the ball it's going to drop in the
00:20:54.620 ground it doesn't matter if your opinion is it shouldn't so when it comes to israel i don't have an
00:20:59.740 opinion it's just an observation whoever has the most power is going to use it if the palestinians
00:21:05.740 have the most power they would be badly abusing the israelis the israelis have the most power so
00:21:11.340 they're having their way with gaza and you know you can characterize it any way you want
00:21:17.020 but it's just going to happen and your opinion about it makes no difference to anybody
00:21:20.540 don lemon goes to ohio he did the same thing in new jersey he was asking people he stopped randomly
00:21:30.700 who they're going to support and there were people um people who supported harris and people who supported
00:21:37.980 trump but what what i found was interesting is that there were so many black americans
00:21:46.300 who had no problem whatsoever saying into a camera that they support trump now i don't remember that in
00:21:54.540 the past is it just because nobody did that kind of interview in that kind of population it to me it
00:22:02.540 looks completely different see the thing i don't understand is if you looked at the numbers what would
00:22:10.220 the numbers be it would be something like okay trump yeah granted trump is going to do better than any
00:22:16.380 republican but that's still in the sub 20 percent isn't it what do we imagine is trump's best case
00:22:25.260 scenario for the black vote it's not very high is it so in the 20s maybe would be the the best any
00:22:32.780 republican ever did but then when you see don lemon doing his street interviews
00:22:39.660 the observation doesn't match the data because it certainly looks like at least at least half
00:22:47.740 of the black citizens he talked to said trump right off right off
00:22:54.540 and i thought i don't think that's the same as before
00:22:58.620 and if we're seeing any evidence that kamala harris is picking up the black vote and it's you know
00:23:04.540 moving moving back away from trump why don't we see it in the wild
00:23:11.980 you know i always tell you the one of my
00:23:14.620 bullshit detectors is when your direct observation doesn't match the data
00:23:20.380 so the pollsters are telling us oh kamala harris has taken back the black vote and
00:23:24.620 you know it's going to be 80 to 20 or something but then you go on the street
00:23:31.980 and you might even get more people saying they're going to vote for
00:23:36.220 trump more black americans now why is that now keep in mind this was
00:23:41.820 don lemon doing it and he did it in two different places ohio and new jersey and in both cases the the
00:23:49.260 black americans in a surprising percentage of them said yeah trump trump trump so
00:23:58.860 are the pollsters wrong or are we just seeing a really weird slice of america that's just coincidental
00:24:06.060 and you know i don't know but when you see observation so violently uh and a whack with the data
00:24:17.100 you should at least tell yourself the data is not as credible as you think it is
00:24:22.300 that at least you should do that i wouldn't say that the anecdotal stuff is stronger
00:24:27.980 but you should at least doubt the data be questioning all right um morning joe
00:24:37.580 i don't know have any of you found this habit yet that i click msnbc for
00:24:45.420 some kind of weird entertainment value i'll use the example of my philosophy teacher used in college
00:24:52.380 i took philosophy 101 that's why i'm so smart philosophy 101 yeah yep mastered it um but my philosophy professor
00:25:04.060 uh he used to say that uh if you had a tooth that was loose and you knew it was going to come out
00:25:12.540 you know let's say it was one of your first teeth yeah you'd push against it with your tongue
00:25:18.140 and wiggle it even though it hurt have you ever had that experience like you know it hurts to push
00:25:25.180 on your loose tooth with your tongue but you kind of do it anyway why do you do that it's like an
00:25:31.900 irresistible pain it's the weirdest little philosophical thing that we humans will do willingly
00:25:39.900 painful things in some weird situations but this is me when i watch uh msnbc i'll see it on my you know
00:25:48.780 phone or on the tv screen that it's a choice and i'll think to myself oh i'm not going to be happy if
00:25:55.820 i click that oh it's going to hurt me if i click that oh there's nothing but pain and unpleasantness if
00:26:03.020 i click that then i click it i can't help it but here's here's what i realized about watching morning
00:26:11.580 joe claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament i've been visualizing my match all
00:26:16.860 week she was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car on her backhand
00:26:22.220 side good thing claudia's with intact the insurer with the largest network of auto service centers in
00:26:28.460 the country everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her way in a rental car
00:26:32.940 in no time i made it to my tournament and lost in the first round but you got there on time intact
00:26:39.420 insurance your auto service ace certain conditions apply so i watched uh morning joe with this this
00:26:46.780 weird kind of desperate explanation of how harris is spreading joy and energy but uh you know trump
00:26:56.380 is losing losing his energy or something and i thought when i watch morning joe here's what it
00:27:02.380 feels like it feels like c plus college students who have been asked to write an essay that's got to be
00:27:10.940 new every day on why trump is bad everything they say sounds like a bad college student writing an essay
00:27:20.140 all right i'm going to assign your your task your task is to make trump sound bad well but i i wrote
00:27:28.540 that essay yesterday yes yes you did write that essay yesterday and you wrote it every single day for the
00:27:34.860 last eight years but today we'd like you to write a new essay but don't you know try not to repeat a lot
00:27:41.900 of the things you said before all right well okay i think i can make some tortured argument about
00:27:49.180 stealing our democracy no you already wrote that essay you've written 20 of those essays we we'd like
00:27:55.980 something new uh uh and then they come up with this tortured academic argument that nobody cares about
00:28:06.780 and and watching them try to do their c plus essay that is the millionth time in a row they had the
00:28:13.260 same assignment but they got to make it different it's just sort of entertaining like pushing a tooth
00:28:20.220 that's loose that hurts when you push it i can't explain it it's entertaining but it hurts i'll probably
00:28:26.380 keep doing it well a washington post columnist is uh fox news reporting uh that uh is it megan mccardell
00:28:37.820 um said that the fact checkers were ineffective in the trump era
00:28:42.460 and that the bottom line is that the the the more the news tried to fact check trump the more popular
00:28:50.620 trump got and the less people watched the news
00:28:56.380 trump destroyed the entire news industry like no basically people don't watch it don't trust it
00:29:04.780 and even the fact checkers are known to be liars at this point so there's just nothing there's just
00:29:10.620 no reason to watch the washington post just no reason anyway as mccardell said after eight years of
00:29:18.940 all-out disinformation warfare trump's approval ratings are holding up better than public trust
00:29:24.380 and academia and journalism yes because the public is figuring it out now you know what else i learned
00:29:33.580 um watching uh don lemon's street interviews so the interviews went like this who are you going to
00:29:41.180 support for president then they'd say somebody and then he'd often follow up with well why do you like
00:29:47.500 them and here would be the i'll give you a standard but um you know this is a fictional answer but it
00:29:55.260 represents all of the people like all the people he talked to all right so what do you like about um
00:30:01.100 the policies of kamala harris oh um
00:30:07.020 well um trump said he would eat a baby
00:30:11.420 and you think to yourself no he didn't no he didn't there's nothing like that and then you
00:30:21.580 would realize that they didn't know anything else except that they think they heard trump ate a baby
00:30:30.140 now i'm making that one up but here's a real one there was a black woman who was asked who she'd vote
00:30:35.420 for her she said trump um and then as part of her explanation she said that kamala harris lied
00:30:43.500 and then don lemon said well what would be an example of a lie that kamala harris told and the
00:30:49.980 voter said well she said she was black remember this is a female black voter and don lemon is like
00:30:58.460 um no actually she's always identified as black and the voter said i don't think so
00:31:10.380 there wasn't a single person that don lemon talked to that appeared on video
00:31:16.220 that seemed to know much of anything about politics not even you know if you were going to rank it from one
00:31:22.940 to ten with the people like you and me who followed every day we're we're sort of tens and a one out of
00:31:31.660 ten because every single day i look at the news every single day i talk about it and almost every day
00:31:38.620 you're here so we're in the really really narrow very few people who actually pay attention to the news
00:31:48.060 and even we know the news is fake so we're paying attention as hard as we can and we it's mostly just
00:31:54.140 fake so can you blame the people who just bailed out and said you know i don't really even need to
00:32:00.460 watch the news i'll just go with my gut it's not crazy because you know it would be easy for us to say
00:32:09.020 oh how superior we are we watch the news yeah no we're not like the people on the streets can we take a
00:32:17.500 moment to just celebrate how awesome we are because we really pay attention to the news
00:32:23.100 we can answer questions in some detail not like those people on the street but our news is fake
00:32:31.900 it doesn't matter how much you study it does it doesn't matter how deep you make a dive you're
00:32:37.740 never going to have enough information to really know what's going on so we're sort of living in this
00:32:44.060 illusion where we've figured it out and those dumb people on the street haven't looked into it so
00:32:49.180 they don't know what they're doing no their guess is probably just as good as yours probably just as good
00:32:58.940 anyway here's a here's some uh more of why you should trust the press apparently there's a reporter
00:33:07.420 from a wyoming newspaper who got fired because they found out he was just using ai to write his articles
00:33:16.220 and it was just too obvious because you know you can spot ai writing pretty easily so even and even
00:33:21.740 his sources were made up so he made up sources or maybe the ai hallucinated him i don't know but he
00:33:28.380 had fake sources and fake writing and they caught him and fired him but don't worry because all of the
00:33:35.820 other reporters totally professional he's the only one who tried to get away with something
00:33:43.580 well there's also some news about the bbc
00:33:48.700 there was a report by net zero watch about the bbc and it says that the bbc had
00:33:55.660 uh 30 cases of bias what they call it which is basically 30 cases of getting facts wrong maybe
00:34:05.420 intentionally about climate change um from 2023 30 examples of just climate
00:34:15.180 bullshit in the news on the bbc but don't you worry people because it's only that one reporter in wyoming
00:34:23.900 who turned out to be bad we got rid of them so everything else is good and don't worry that the
00:34:30.380 even the columnist for the washington post says that their fact checkers are completely failing
00:34:37.500 and don't worry that the bbc is simply making up science
00:34:43.100 everything else is fine yeah everything else is is it's right on point
00:34:47.820 it's only every single thing we check that's wrong uh doge designer on x that's an account on x
00:34:59.020 says we asked chat gpt and meta ai which party runs the legacy media and the answer was what do you
00:35:06.060 think the answer was when when they asked the two big ais who runs the legacy media well
00:35:12.860 um both of them said immediately democrats now did you just say to yourself whoa it looks like ai has
00:35:22.940 some some capability it told the truth even an unpleasant truth and it said something that's
00:35:30.060 not good for democrats now you didn't see that coming did you right so this feels quite credible doesn't it
00:35:37.740 uh thank goodness ai went from hiding the truth to now just plainly saying what we can all see that
00:35:47.420 the democrats run the legacy media in fact elon musk even even uh did a little post on it
00:35:55.500 concurring that the ai's got it right that the democrats run the legacy media
00:36:01.340 except it's not true how many of you think the democrats run the legacy media
00:36:14.060 you all believe that right obviously not whoever is running the country is not the democrats running
00:36:21.260 the media whoever is in control of the democrats is in control of the legacy media
00:36:29.260 the democrats apparently the ai has no problem telling you the democrats are in charge do you know
00:36:36.860 why who would like you to think the democrats are in charge of the legacy media let me think who would
00:36:43.900 want you to think that well fox news might want you to think that so is that why the ais um are saying
00:36:52.700 it's true because fox news thinks it's true and and they took their side probably not
00:36:59.580 is it because elon musk says it's true and and a lot of you would say it true is that why the ai agrees
00:37:07.740 because so many smart people say it's true that the democrats run the legacy media
00:37:14.060 here's what it looks like to me it looks like the cia runs all of our media and they would love for
00:37:20.140 you to think the democrats are doing it i don't think the democrats are doing it i think the democrats are
00:37:26.460 under the control of the people who are doing it now some of those might be registered democrats
00:37:32.380 but it's not if you're thinking that the people who work as cnn are mostly democrats
00:37:38.620 and therefore the democrats run the media you're really missing the bigger story
00:37:43.580 because they don't get to report on anything they want to report on i'm pretty sure they have a
00:37:48.940 an uber boss that tell you know a boss that tells them what's in and what's out and that's probably
00:37:55.820 the intelligence people because i would think at this point they would control all of that it's their job
00:38:01.020 it if the united states intelligence groups did not already control our legacy media the question
00:38:10.780 would be why not that they should because brainwashing the population is kind of their biggest job
00:38:21.900 domestically you know externally they have other jobs but domestically brainwashing americans to be
00:38:28.380 good citizens and fight for the flag that's sort of what they do so it's not really the democrats
00:38:36.780 running the legacy media except for the stuff that the cia doesn't care about one way or the other
00:38:43.260 ontario the wait is over the gold standard of online casinos has arrived golden nugget online casino
00:38:50.620 is live bringing vegas style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips
00:38:56.460 whether you're a seasoned player or just starting signing up is fast and simple and in just a few
00:39:01.900 clicks you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games make the
00:39:07.580 most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a
00:39:13.180 golden opportunity at golden nugget online casino take a spin on the slots challenge yourself at the
00:39:18.940 tables or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action all from the comfort of your own
00:39:24.620 devices why settle for less when you can go for the gold at golden nugget online casino gambling
00:39:31.260 problem call connects ontario 1-866-531-2600 19 and over physically present in ontario eligibility
00:39:38.780 restrictions apply see golden nugget casino.com for details please play responsibly i remember i told
00:39:45.260 you that there would be no economists who support kamala harris's economic plan
00:39:49.580 well even axios is reporting that uh even the left-leaning economists are against it and they
00:39:57.180 named a bunch jason firman the ed ernie tedeschi the washington post editorial board josh barrow
00:40:06.300 katherine rampell they've all criticized the harris campaign proposal and governor whitmer who is the co
00:40:13.980 um she's the co-chair of the harris campaign was asked about her economic plan and ed whitmer
00:40:25.900 avoided the question imagine being the co-chair of the harris campaign and when somebody asks you about
00:40:34.140 her economic plan clearly the most important part of what she's going to do and the co-chair couldn't endorse
00:40:43.180 it the co-chair now when i told you that there would be no economist on the left or the right that
00:40:50.300 would endorse it i thought i'd i thought i'd gone pretty far like well you know that's that's really
00:40:58.300 going far to say even the democrat economist will shit on her plan and they did but what i did not see
00:41:06.460 is that the resistance to it would be so strong it would get her campaign co-chair it's very clear
00:41:13.820 that the campaign co-chair knows this is a bad idea or she would say it was a good idea it's her job to
00:41:19.260 say that these are good ideas she couldn't do it now i'm gonna have to give her some credit
00:41:26.060 because there are very few things that politicians do that could make you feel they're credible because
00:41:34.540 you know they're sort of professional liars but when i watch somebody who's a professional liar
00:41:39.740 meaning just a politician it's not even an insult a politician's sort of a professional liar
00:41:45.740 when i watch somebody who's in the job of politics and is the co-chairman or co-chairperson
00:41:52.620 and is avoiding the question because clearly she can't endorse such a bad idea
00:42:01.180 i actually felt some credibility for her meaning that it actually changed my opinion of governor
00:42:07.500 whitmer because when you watch somebody in a situation like that where you know they should lie
00:42:14.860 and they can't do it then that means there's something on the inside
00:42:19.020 that makes them not be able to lie have you ever been in that situation where you know you should lie
00:42:25.820 but you just can't do it let me tell you a story when i was working in the corporate world
00:42:31.100 one day my boss's boss's boss was supposed to go to some meeting about budget stuff couldn't make it
00:42:37.420 so he sent me now i was several levels below the boss that was supposed to be there
00:42:42.060 but i was the budget guy so i knew the most about the budget so he said go to this meeting for me
00:42:49.100 so what i find out when i get there is it's about cutting the budget so the person in charge of the
00:42:55.500 meeting goes to me and they go um you've presented a budget that's got this or that in it and everybody's
00:43:01.740 cutting the budget what would you say if we cut this part of your budget
00:43:05.500 now remember i'm a real junior i'm a nothing and my boss's boss's boss is the one who was supposed
00:43:13.660 to be there fighting to maintain his budget because his world depended on getting the whole budget the
00:43:20.540 bigger your budget the more important you are as a senior manager but it wasn't my job and i sat there
00:43:27.180 and i thought okay i'm pretty sure i know my boss's boss's boss would want me to lie right now
00:43:33.740 and make some argument for why we really need this project which even i didn't think was terribly
00:43:38.540 important and in the context of you got to make some tough choices to cut the budget and i watched
00:43:43.980 other people making tough choices when they went to me and said can we cut this from your budget i was
00:43:49.260 like well all right if you have to so i agreed with it boy was my boss's boss's boss unhappy with me
00:43:58.460 but here's the thing internally i couldn't tell that lie i knew what my job was i knew my job was to
00:44:06.700 lie i knew what my job was just couldn't do it i couldn't look at another human being and just say
00:44:13.100 something that's complete bullshit just can't do it so when i saw whitmer also not be able to lie
00:44:22.300 honestly her my opinion of her went up i know she's taking a side but she couldn't tell that lie
00:44:30.700 i appreciate that now uh let's compare that with uh krugman you know we were all waiting to see if
00:44:39.260 krugman who's a famous economist on the left was going to back the uh economic plan
00:44:46.220 because you think all right he'll he'll back anything you know as long as it's democrat side
00:44:51.020 so he does a post on it and i read it and i reread it and i was like i feel like you're just trying to
00:45:00.300 talk around it so he he very much did not give a full-throated endorsement he just tried to add some
00:45:08.780 weaselly context as if it made any difference but it didn't so you could think that he talked about it
00:45:14.460 it but he didn't talk about it and i thought even krugman couldn't lie well i shouldn't say that i
00:45:23.580 don't know if he's ever lied before if he's just believed what he said but he clearly didn't believe
00:45:29.020 in her plan but he didn't want to say it's a bad plan because he would prefer getting elected i assume
00:45:36.940 so instead he just did some word salad and said okay don't ask me any more questions i think
00:45:42.140 so stephen uh stephen a smith was doing a little rant about how harris hasn't done any real press
00:45:51.900 events and she needs to be tested so that the public can see her answering tough questions
00:45:59.100 i'm going to double and triple down on saying that the harris and her campaign are very smart
00:46:04.540 to avoid the press why who's ever been better off talking to the press
00:46:12.140 that there are some things that we just assume to be true because it's just sort of what we're used
00:46:18.460 to but every now and then you realize that the reason for the thing you always did didn't make
00:46:23.580 sense i'll give you another example why do we have electronic voting machines we just sort of assume
00:46:30.060 that somebody had a reason right didn't you assume that if you asked around somebody smart would say oh
00:46:38.540 yeah there's a good reason for the electronic voting machines but i don't know what it is
00:46:44.140 doesn't save money isn't faster isn't more credible isn't easier to manage
00:46:51.020 so we just we just get used to the thing the fact that somebody must know why there's a reason
00:46:56.060 all right here's another one it's like the electronic voting machines
00:46:59.820 why do presidential candidates talk to the press
00:47:02.300 now your your reflex is of course they have to talk to the press they've always talked to the
00:47:09.580 press scott uh why why would you even ask such a dumb question talking to the press
00:47:16.700 because of the free speech and the importance of the press to monitor the government it's the most
00:47:21.340 important thing of course stephen a smith is completely right she needs to talk to the press
00:47:27.420 does she what's the reason there isn't any the reason is you think you're going to learn something
00:47:39.180 no you're not no you're not is trump better off because he talks to the press
00:47:47.500 well let me give you some examples do you remember that time he talked to the press and he said that he
00:47:52.780 completely disavows the neo-nazis in charlottesville he said that to the press what did the press report
00:48:01.340 the press took him out of context and said he thought that the neo-nazis are fine people
00:48:06.140 was that was that good for trump to talk to the press because that press is such a an important
00:48:12.780 watchdog of our democracy if you don't talk to the press how will the people know what's true
00:48:18.940 well the press lied to the whole country for eight years or however many years six years
00:48:27.900 the press is the ones who lie to you they're not the ones who tell you the truth how about uh that trump
00:48:34.380 said inject bleach into your body that was at a press event it was a press event did trump say you should
00:48:43.180 put bleach or any any chemical disinfectant in your body he did not he was talking about light as a
00:48:50.460 disinfectant which was being trialed at the time to inject like a you know um uv light with a device
00:48:59.180 down the throat to see if you could irradiate the lungs and the trachea right that's what he was talking
00:49:04.300 about but the press turned it into he wants you to drink bleach all right now i would say those are the
00:49:11.500 two biggest problems trump's ever had and it's because he talked to the press almost everything
00:49:19.100 that that is fake and bullshit about trump is because of the press so now i ask you again
00:49:28.700 why would a presidential candidate talk to the press what's the upside is it because the
00:49:35.580 the voters need to know no i just told you about the don lemon interviews the voters don't do anything
00:49:45.660 see we you and i you know you watching this and i and the one percent of americans who really follow
00:49:52.780 politics we we get fooled into thinking other people are like us they're not like us they barely
00:49:59.820 know the names of the two presidential candidates everybody knows trump but some of them don't even
00:50:05.180 know who he's running against no there's no information advantage of the press they're either gonna lie
00:50:14.940 or nobody pays attention or it's complicated like how many of the voters that don lemon talked to
00:50:21.580 could say oh it's terrible that the european union is using their external power to satisfy
00:50:29.260 um you know some deep powers in the united states for censorship
00:50:35.660 any how many voters understand the hunter biden ukraine situation it's almost none so why do we even have
00:50:46.380 a press it's not informing anybody except the one percent of people who convince themselves they know things
00:50:53.500 because we still pretend we think data is real data isn't real
00:51:00.300 for anything that matters when when the data doesn't matter to anybody it could be real but
00:51:06.940 when it matters it's all fake because the people who it matters the most do make sure you don't see the
00:51:12.620 real stuff because they're trying to sell you something every time there's always money involved
00:51:17.100 so yeah no there's no reason really for anybody to talk to the press
00:51:25.260 um meanwhile mario knoffel was reporting that uh this hospital near the dnc convention is preparing
00:51:35.660 just in case there's a chemical attack by converting spaces into decontamination centers well now that's scary
00:51:43.420 because it sounds like they expect a chemical attack but i think that the standard will be
00:51:51.580 that pretty soon wherever there are large events where people gather that the local hospitals will have
00:51:58.460 to gear up for mass chemical warfare because i think drones are going to be dropping poison on crowds
00:52:07.500 not indoors probably you know less likely indoors but i think that uh it doesn't really signal that
00:52:15.660 they have a specific threat they might but it doesn't signal that because i think they should all be doing
00:52:22.540 that now to me that just sounds like getting ready i don't have a problem with that
00:52:29.660 bank more encores when you switch to a scotia bank banking package learn more at scotia bank.com
00:52:37.500 slash banking packages conditions apply scotia bank you're richer than you think
00:52:44.140 meanwhile zero hedge and others are reporting that the bureaus of labor statistics is planning to revise
00:52:50.940 downward um jobs for the april 2023 to march 2024 so it's about a year um by a million so if they
00:53:01.980 revise it down by a million that would mean that every time they said it was good it was bad
00:53:09.660 so everything you heard about jobs was a lie now let's say the job numbers are data's that matter
00:53:18.140 and they've all been a lie all the data that matters is always a lie because somebody has an interest in
00:53:27.740 lying or it's hard to collect it could be one or one or both of those things no it's all fake all the
00:53:34.780 data that matters is fake now you you can find an exception like you know whatever spacex is doing to
00:53:42.620 launch rockets depends very much on data but people don't have you know like a great financial interest
00:53:49.820 in lying to you about the you know trajectory of a rocket so if nobody cares about it politically yeah
00:53:56.380 that could be right and useful uh kamala harris has a new uh post on x she says the democratic party
00:54:06.300 must commit to showing up for black women all the time not just during an election year
00:54:13.260 i found that disgusted me that idea i'll read it again see if you have that feeling of disgust
00:54:22.140 and i'll tell you why in a minute the democratic party must commit to showing up for black women
00:54:26.220 all the time not just during an election year now of course i want both of the parties to be responsive to
00:54:32.140 all the public so it's not about that of course the politics should be responsible to all americans
00:54:40.220 period but
00:54:45.580 i'm offended that she calls herself a black woman
00:54:50.140 and wants me to buy into it now here's my take if she wants to identify as a black woman i'm fine with
00:54:59.020 that why would i have a complaint in any way if she wants to say this is who i am uh i'd like to
00:55:06.140 identify as black i do have you know half of me is indian american but i identify as black no problem at all
00:55:14.780 doesn't disgust me doesn't bother me
00:55:18.780 it's everybody's right i'd like to define myself as well so yeah define yourself here's what bothers me
00:55:25.820 she doesn't get to tell me how to define her
00:55:31.900 i define her as a unique individual who is not like anybody else i've ever met
00:55:39.580 i've never met anybody who is i don't think i don't think i've ever met anybody who was half black and half
00:55:46.540 indian who was a prosecutor and a senator and a vice president
00:55:51.340 i've never met anybody like that she's literally the only one same with trump there's only one of
00:55:59.100 them so to imagine that i should judge her by the some kind of average that happens to people who are
00:56:06.540 black is really offensive to me because i don't need to buy into your own personal definition of who you
00:56:16.380 are likewise if somebody wants to you know be identified as this or that for reasons of just
00:56:25.260 polite behavior i might be completely happy to define them by whatever pronouns they want i'm not
00:56:32.140 i'm not a real uh you know i'm not too i guess i'm not too bothered by pronouns whatever it is you want to be
00:56:40.540 called if i can remember it i'll be happy to do it but that's different for me agreeing with what you call
00:56:47.180 yourself i don't have to agree with it you can live in your own fantasy and i can see you as whatever i
00:56:56.060 want i might agree i might not but i'm not obligated in any way to agree with your definition of yourself
00:57:03.580 i do like living in a polite world where we're at least polite to each other and that that's included
00:57:12.460 but no don't tell me uh you can tell me that you're black and you identify as a black woman that's fine
00:57:19.980 but don't suggest that somehow i should see it that way i see you as not like anybody else
00:57:26.460 in a good way by the way did that sound like an insult it shouldn't yeah being black and indian
00:57:35.260 has apparently blessed her with an incredibly good-looking body and she's gone very far so
00:57:43.020 whatever she is is working clearly working so why not just be that why not just be an individual
00:57:50.940 the biggest problem america ever made is allowing people to convince us that the average of people
00:57:57.340 who look like us should matter to us the average of people who look like you should matter it shouldn't
00:58:05.500 no it should not it should not matter in any way should it matter to me that the average black person
00:58:12.540 has some specific problem from a legacy of slavery no it could be true and it could be a real problem i
00:58:22.540 think systemic racism is real but it's one of a million problems i want to know your individual problem
00:58:31.980 do you have an individual problem i could help with that yeah do you need a connection need some
00:58:37.500 information do you need a loan you know i've done all those things for people who needed them
00:58:44.220 individually but no i'm not going to do anything for you because you look like the average of other
00:58:49.180 people i don't care about your average performance not at all i do not care if women have whatever
00:58:57.900 experience on average i don't care if brown people have whatever experience on average i very much care
00:59:05.420 about you as individuals so if you need a hand no matter who you are i'm all in don't care about your average
00:59:16.460 well um so there's a more and more uh noise being made about what appears to be kamala harris's uh
00:59:25.820 drug or inebriation problem in public the daily mail has an article that says conservatives claim
00:59:32.620 these clips show kamala harris is giving speeches while drunk and they give some examples
00:59:39.900 and uh and it says that conservatives and even a donald trump campaign official have claimed
00:59:47.100 that harris appears drunk in speaking engagements and then they named a few uh a few conservatives who
00:59:54.140 were behind it they did not name me
00:59:56.780 have i ever told you the hypnotist can hide in plain sight
01:00:06.780 it is one of the coolest thing about being a hypnotist is that you can actually tell people
01:00:11.980 exactly what you're doing do it publicly and people can't see it it's just invisible
01:00:17.980 so i'm glad all these other conservatives and the trump campaign is behind this
01:00:25.660 idea that kamala harris is a drunk you didn't hear it from me as far as you know
01:00:33.980 all right so someone taught harris how to say return on investment now i've told you before that sometimes i
01:00:41.020 try to it's a messy process not always accurate but i try to track my influence and one of the ways i do it
01:00:51.500 is by um unusual word choice so if i introduce an idea into the public domain doing what i'm doing now
01:01:00.460 and i use a word choice that you haven't seen a lot and then it pops up somewhere i think to myself oh
01:01:08.460 oh maybe that was me you know maybe that was my word choice that fit into the public somehow
01:01:15.580 well kamala harris used the phrase return on investment four different times while answering
01:01:21.420 a question about her economic policy now i've been saying that you can't sell this uh price gouging thing
01:01:31.580 without looking at return on investment and i think maybe some economists may have said the same thing to her
01:01:39.020 so it's not like i'm the one person who knows that or something so it could be other people it's just
01:01:44.460 you know my eyebrow goes up like i was saying return on investment and harris an awful lot this week and
01:01:52.060 now she's saying return on investment which i haven't seen her do before um so but here's the interesting
01:02:01.980 thing is that she she used it wrong every time it sounds good when she says it but apparently her
01:02:10.060 technique is simply to say things do have a return on investment that's really not how it works
01:02:17.020 it's not about language you have to do the calculation or at least be aware that there's a cost and a
01:02:23.100 benefit return on investment means that you've calculated the cost of it and also the benefit
01:02:30.060 and that the benefit is greater than the cost if you haven't calculated both of them
01:02:35.420 you're not really doing a return on investment but apparently she has figured out
01:02:41.020 that she can call anything a return on investment and it sort of sounds good it does actually sound
01:02:46.620 good so she would say for example uh we're going to help people uh buy a house and uh that you know
01:02:56.060 history shows that's a good return on investment to which i say really did somebody did somebody study
01:03:04.540 what happens in 2025 if they get a 25 000 help on their house i'll bet nobody studied that so how'd you
01:03:14.620 calculate it how did you calculate the cost who paid for it because you got to do the cost and what exactly
01:03:22.620 is the benefit in in what areas did we get that return and who got the return was it the government
01:03:30.300 got a return for its um tax expense or the extra debt it ran up it's pretty vague so for each of
01:03:40.460 the things she was doing um she thought all she had to do was say and you know in the long run it's
01:03:46.860 obviously a good return on investment now here's the reason that that's irrational from an economist's
01:03:55.180 point of view you could say about anything so let's say that the idea of helping people let's say the
01:04:03.740 idea of no tax on tips or helping people get a home um let's say you calculate it and it sounds pretty
01:04:13.500 good or at least you can sell it by saying oh it's got a good roi here's the problem
01:04:18.540 everything fits into that category so i say to you hey how about reparations for slavery well
01:04:27.740 why do you want to do that well in the long run as good roi does it nobody knows you can't really
01:04:37.500 calculate it but you could say it you could say the words as a good roi
01:04:44.220 um how about cannibalism yeah we think cannibalism should come back it'll lower the food costs we'll
01:04:53.820 just eat each other uh and i think the roi is going to be excellent now that's a ridiculous one
01:05:01.020 but my point is there's nothing that has ever been discussed from you know funding schools more
01:05:08.220 or anything just literally anything that sounds like if you say it quickly it sounds like a good
01:05:15.260 idea you just say it's a good return on investment anything so therefore it's nothing if you can apply
01:05:23.100 it to everything then it's not really anything searchlight pictures presents the roses only in
01:05:29.820 theaters august 29th from the director of meet the parents and the writer of poor things comes the
01:05:35.500 roses starring academy award winner olivia coleman academy award nominee benedict cumberbatch andy
01:05:41.660 sandberg kate mckinnon and allison janney a hilarious new comedy filled with drama excitement and a little
01:05:48.140 bit of hatred proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses see the roses only in theaters august 29th
01:05:54.940 get tickets now but here's my suggestion for slavery reparations
01:06:00.380 is there anything that would stop us legally from saying that only republican or that only democrat
01:06:08.540 voters pay for it we've never done anything like that have we but republican voters by a fairly
01:06:17.180 sizable majority think that reparations would be a good idea republicans largely against it
01:06:23.820 but suppose that trump said this will never happen this is just fun recreational fantasy thinking suppose
01:06:32.940 trump said i'm in favor of recreation i'm in favor of reparations for slavery but i think it should be
01:06:40.460 limited to the group that says they're willing to pay for it because that way we don't have division
01:06:47.500 so democrats are very much in favor of it so why don't we say that if you voted for harris you'd be
01:06:55.660 on the hook for paying for reparations if you voted for trump you would not be on the hook for paying
01:07:00.860 reparations because that would be a group that didn't want to pay it now why wouldn't that be legal
01:07:08.940 because the government seems to be able to tax any individual group it wants to am i wrong the
01:07:15.500 government can say this industry pays more the government can say people who own a home pay less
01:07:21.740 it can say people who have children pay less on taxes the government can pick any group for any reason
01:07:29.180 and say we'll pay you you pay more you less on taxes right so is there anything that would prevent
01:07:36.460 the government from saying look democrats really want this and has a good roi
01:07:41.980 so if we make the republicans pay it'll never happen but since the roi for reparations is so good
01:07:50.860 that if democrats do it well most of the benefits will go to other democrats because black people are
01:07:56.700 off more often democrat so they could say well democrats could pay for reparations and then the roi
01:08:03.500 is good and that roi would mostly accrue to other democrats so how about that now
01:08:12.780 the real argument here is to wonder why it wouldn't be a good idea i'm not saying it's a good idea
01:08:20.060 but it's fun to imagine why it's not i can't think of a reason if there's a certain group of americans
01:08:28.140 who want reparations and also want to pay for it why would you care would black americans say no i don't
01:08:36.460 want that if only the democrats pay for it i don't think so i think black americans would say wait a
01:08:43.420 minute you're gonna give me a check and all i have to do is just nothing i think they'd say yeah if the
01:08:50.220 democrats want to pay for it mostly white democrats yeah sure
01:08:56.380 so who loses the democrats would be happy because they paid for reparations so they'd feel less
01:09:03.260 guilty they would get the own they would get the roi to other democrats mostly it'd be good for the
01:09:10.620 country roi but mostly democrats and the republicans would be oh that's good you left us out of it thank
01:09:16.940 you yeah it's it's sort of a thinker it just makes you think why can't we do that i actually don't know
01:09:26.060 any reason you couldn't do it
01:09:27.180 can you it would put an amazing pressure on democrat leaders to say why the republicans should pay for it
01:09:40.140 anyway um
01:09:44.140 so here's a little uh persuasion lesson
01:09:48.780 um this comes to you courtesy of mike cernovich's account on x now as you know uh tim waltz
01:09:57.180 reportedly went to china 30 times now you all know that if you're watching this you know it
01:10:06.460 and you have some opinions about that but you're probably thinking to yourself something along the
01:10:11.500 line of you know everybody's different he was taking some tours over there kind of like the country
01:10:19.340 so he went a lot of times is that so weird but listen to it listen to the way that mike cernovich
01:10:28.060 puts it in the form of a question and watch how it hits you differently just the way he words it
01:10:34.220 if i simply tell you he went to china many times
01:10:38.540 then your brain says oh and then it goes on to the next topic
01:10:43.020 but listen to this cervich says i'm paraphrasing but basically saying who needs to go to china 30 times
01:10:49.820 as soon as you hear that it just hits you differently doesn't it who needs to go to china 30 times
01:11:00.140 just automatically the question makes you know there's something up i don't know what
01:11:05.100 but there's something up with that and as uh mike pointed out um even people who do manufacturing in
01:11:14.460 china don't go 30 times i have a friend who did some manufacturing with a chinese company he went twice
01:11:21.500 why why why do you need to go 30 times now i'm guessing it had something to do with the
01:11:29.820 classes he was taking over there so maybe it was just a regular program that happened
01:11:34.380 once a year twice a year if happened twice a year for 15 years you got 30 trips
01:11:44.140 so i don't know but uh the only point is that if you put it in terms of a question
01:11:50.380 it completely hits you differently because you can't answer the question if i just say it's a truth
01:11:57.500 you're not automatically triggered to figure out like what's up with it but if he puts it in a question
01:12:05.900 your brain just chews on it because it wants to answer the question much more persuasive that's
01:12:12.460 so the lesson is not about waltz the lesson is if you want to learn how to persuade watch
01:12:18.860 sort of itch's account kevin o'leary was on some show i think it was on fox
01:12:26.620 and says that waltz was a terrible manager of the state they destroyed job growth and people left to
01:12:32.300 the neighboring states and all that now o'leary presents himself as not being political he's just
01:12:41.020 saying from a pure business standpoint he was bad for business in his state and he apparently
01:12:49.340 waltz is not exactly good at managing his own finances because he got to this point in his life
01:12:55.580 and he doesn't really have a ton of finances i do trust people a little bit more if they can figure out how
01:13:03.740 to retire with more money than he's got so you know it does show um we got a new drunk
01:13:13.420 bo johnson coming in with the all caps very consistent with the all caps bo keep drinking
01:13:22.540 all right um rasmussen did a poll on this tim waltz stolen valor thing
01:13:28.940 uh 45 of voters say the accusations against waltz won't make much difference in how they vote they
01:13:37.020 might not like it but they're saying it won't make much difference to their vote 34 say the accusations
01:13:43.340 about the stolen valor um makes them less likely to vote for harris but 16 here's the
01:13:52.540 here's the money shop 16 say the accusations against waltz for stolen valor
01:13:59.900 makes them more likely to vote for the democrat
01:14:08.460 16 of voters
01:14:11.420 are more likely to vote for waltz because he allegedly avoided combat
01:14:20.940 did you see that coming
01:14:21.980 okay i'm gonna admit i didn't see that coming i did not see that coming
01:14:30.460 why because i made that mistake of thinking that other people are like me
01:14:36.860 and you probably made the same mistake it's the most common mistake everybody makes all the time is
01:14:41.340 assuming other people are at least a little bit like you
01:14:44.540 and so you say what would i do in this situation i'll tell you what i wouldn't do
01:14:48.380 is be more likely to vote for him because he's accused of avoiding going to war that never even
01:14:55.820 occurred to me i either thought it was a don't care or you do care especially if you had some military
01:15:02.140 experience or you're a family i didn't really think anybody would look at it and say you know
01:15:09.100 now there's a good reason to vote for him he avoided the draft or not the draft he avoided uh
01:15:14.700 deployment by retiring just just before the deployment and other people saying well that's a good play he's obviously smart
01:15:24.060 the other people went over there and fought so who's the smart one now
01:15:27.980 that's what those 16 percent say that's not me that's the 16
01:15:34.060 so but here's what i think i don't really think that
01:15:38.460 uh polling the general public is the way to go on this question i think if you only polled veterans
01:15:49.100 or direct family members of veterans like spouses i think they're the only ones that matter
01:15:55.980 because i would think that almost nobody's going to change their vote unless they really care about
01:16:02.220 that issue and so if you talk to the people who are most likely to really care you know service people
01:16:08.380 and their families if they say it's no big deal well that tells you something but if they say you know
01:16:17.420 honestly i just i can't allow any chance that that vp would ever rise to commander in chief just that's my
01:16:25.580 red line i can't possibly be in favor of that well that would matter but i don't know if talking to the
01:16:31.500 general public about a topic that's so narrowly focused at a specific part of the country i don't
01:16:39.180 know all right speaking of mike cernovich again he had an idea that trump should come out and say
01:16:48.780 that he'll make mortgages assumable as long as the buyer is credit worthy in other words you don't buy
01:16:57.340 the house and pay off the bank and then hope you can get a new loan you just take over the loan you
01:17:03.100 know plus probably some extra cash if there was some equity involved and uh but you'd have to be
01:17:09.020 a credit worthy buyer now here's why this matters let's say you're a boomer like me and you're in a big
01:17:17.340 house and you say to yourself you know what i i would sell this big house and move into a smaller one
01:17:24.220 and that would allow somebody who had maybe a big family or something a lot of money to move into a
01:17:28.700 bigger house but if you look at the interest rates you'd say wait a minute i don't have an i don't have
01:17:35.420 a mortgage but if i did i would have been like a three percent rate because of when i would have gotten
01:17:41.740 it but now if i had to sell my house and get another house that also had a mortgage i'd be paying
01:17:48.300 some much higher rate so i say i won't do it i'll wait till the rates come down so you have all this
01:17:55.820 unnecessary friction in the market that you could remove just by having people assume loans that are
01:18:04.300 that are lower interest rates now who would be opposed to such a thing well all the bankers
01:18:09.740 because the bankers want to give you a new loan and get those new fees for the loan you know fees up
01:18:18.860 front and then they want to charge you a higher interest rate and then they want to package up
01:18:25.820 all your loans and sell them to the third parties who end up owning all the loans
01:18:29.500 but as mike says let let wall street figure it out you know if trump just does something
01:18:38.620 promote something that's good for the public uh but not so much for the bankers the bankers could
01:18:44.940 probably figure it out all right here's an idea i love so much i wish i'd said it first but the ceo
01:18:52.620 founder of the figure robot company you'll hear more about them figures going to be one of the big
01:18:58.860 names and robots it looks like so brett adcock was saying that there should be some kind of a
01:19:06.620 program or app where you can get local farmers to sell you food directly without the middlemen
01:19:14.860 uh partly because the middle people are adding all the dangerous chemicals and everything and you'd feel
01:19:22.060 more comfortable if you especially if it's an organic farm i suppose if you just got it directly from the
01:19:26.940 farm now there are of course all kinds of rules and regulations and reasons you can't do that
01:19:33.580 but i wouldn't i went to safeway yesterday um and i walked through this giant store of food
01:19:43.420 and i couldn't find anything to eat do you know why i just i know too much now so everything in the
01:19:52.380 middle of the store was you know frozen crap with additives and then another a third of the store was
01:20:01.980 bread and cheese yeah i'm kind of off of bread and cheese and you know then a lot of it is like pool toys
01:20:13.420 and you know alcohol that i don't drink and i have to like go way over to like the the vegetable area
01:20:23.180 and pick up some vegetables
01:20:27.100 but i couldn't buy enough at a store to make dinner like there wasn't anything there i was willing to buy
01:20:35.900 that i wanted to put in my mouth so i mean i got some fruit and some vegetables and you know i made
01:20:41.500 something that i already had at home you know some rice and vegetables basically and uh here's here's
01:20:47.820 another story about why it's so hard to eat you might be saying scott why did you go to the grocery
01:20:54.700 store don't you have an assistant to do that shopping for you and the answer is yes i do but i wanted to
01:21:00.780 to get some turmeric because i've been reading such great things about turmeric you know it's good for
01:21:06.860 inflammation and i i thought i wonder if they have turmeric that's like a seasoning that's like mixed
01:21:13.260 with pepper because that's the thing so you can just season whatever you're having with turmeric and
01:21:19.100 pepper and so i had ordered some from amazon so i knew it existed but it wasn't here yet and i wanted to
01:21:26.380 wanted to try yesterday so i thought i'm gonna go to safeway and see if they have some turmeric
01:21:31.900 now of course i looked for some other things since i'm there anyway but the purpose of my trip
01:21:38.700 was to get turmeric i come home with my turmeric i open up the x platform and i see a post about some
01:21:47.660 things that were adding lead to people's diets and found out that in some cases turmeric
01:21:55.580 is full of lead and you shouldn't put it in your body now it's not the turmeric itself it's some
01:22:02.060 providers of it were adding some additives that apparently was very bad what are the odds that i
01:22:10.940 would make a special trip to a grocery store the rarity in itself to look for just this one
01:22:18.940 fucking thing turmeric that i've never had before as as a you know condiment and
01:22:25.820 and that within 10 minutes of getting fucking home i would find out it's going to kill me
01:22:31.740 now really what were the odds of that now keep in mind that it was a post from somebody that you know
01:22:39.580 it was a long post it wasn't because the algorithm heard me say it it wasn't an advertisement it wasn't
01:22:47.580 well maybe it was fed to me oh you know what i can't rule out the fact that the only reason i saw it
01:22:53.580 is because i did something in the world that had something to do with turmeric huh maybe it
01:23:01.180 wasn't a coincidence huh all right well i don't know but i love this idea brad adcock has of figure
01:23:09.180 robots company to have some kind of a marketplace where i could just have the farmer bring me some
01:23:14.380 stuff that would make me feel very good all right the house gop has this big report that the biden
01:23:22.300 family received 27 million dollars from foreign individuals eight million dollar loans from democrat
01:23:29.180 benefactors while biden was a vp that he's not repaid um and then sure enough when he was vp he was
01:23:37.740 taking calls and he was influencing things and uh it's all impeachable so now the gop believes that
01:23:44.860 they have 100 documented impeachable crimes of hunter and the big guy taking vast amounts of money from
01:23:55.420 foreign countries multiple countries for the explicit purpose of influencing american politics and we have
01:24:02.940 the examples where he clearly was involved in influence do you think it'll make any difference
01:24:12.780 i'm gonna say no i i think that it's too close to the end of his term for anybody to bother with
01:24:21.020 impeachment you know it's not really gonna have too much effect on the harris campaign and it's too
01:24:28.780 complicated for the public to understand you know it probably would have made a big difference if
01:24:36.940 if biden were still in the race and maybe this is one of the reasons that the democrats talked him out
01:24:43.180 of it but all that work that uh jim jordan and comer did and all the rest which by the way i'm quite
01:24:53.340 impressed with you know maybe could have been faster but i think they were held up by
01:24:57.740 their sources but i would like to thank them you know comer and jordan and all the other people
01:25:05.980 who worked on this thank you i'm really happy that we have what i consider a clear picture
01:25:12.940 of maybe the worst corruption i've ever seen that's been documented now i too think well i guess it's a
01:25:22.220 little bit too late you know i don't really care too much if there's any kind of penalty that you
01:25:28.060 had something for it i'm just i'm just sort of over it but when they were doing this work they did not
01:25:35.580 know that biden was going to drop out and uh i really think the country owes them owes them a bit of a
01:25:43.340 debt this was good work i'm not how often do i say that not often right i don't often say hey you members
01:25:50.620 of congress sure did a good job on this but i think they did i think they did a good job on it
01:25:59.340 all right all the smart people in politics are saying that pennsylvania will determine the election
01:26:05.980 do you think that's true do you think we're at a point where pennsylvania whichever way that goes
01:26:11.980 that's going to be the the whole game why does it seem like the world of people who make a difference
01:26:20.220 in the election keeps getting smaller it was only the other day that i learned oh there's only like
01:26:27.900 300 000 people in the whole country who are going to make a difference and it's just the swings swing
01:26:34.140 voters and only in the battleground states so i say to myself well that's not ideal it's not ideal that
01:26:42.620 five states determine the election and then i find out that's probably one state
01:26:52.060 it's one state it's just pennsylvania now the smart people are saying you know both democrats and
01:26:59.580 republicans are saying the same thing it's just pennsylvania because they they think the polling
01:27:04.940 is confirming the other states sufficiently that they that no matter what happens there they're
01:27:10.780 confident that it will still be pennsylvania that makes a difference
01:27:16.220 what is up with that do you remember when you were a kid and you learned that we were a republic
01:27:22.060 and how how everything worked and the voters would get to vote and every vote counted and
01:27:28.300 none of that is even close to whatever our government is doing so if it came down to one state
01:27:39.340 it's sorted down to fetterman isn't it let me put this in another way the fetterman apparently is not
01:27:46.460 going to the dnc which some say is a story i'm not sure if it is but fetterman has been not
01:27:54.860 you know unambiguously pro everything harris he is he's wonderfully independent clearly a democrat
01:28:04.860 but wonderfully independent in a way i actually respect that if something is just dumb ass he'll
01:28:10.860 call it dumb ass it doesn't matter if democrats submitted it so i don't have to agree with him
01:28:17.340 i'm just saying that you know like i i gained a little respect for whitmer because it looked like
01:28:24.540 she couldn't lie to us in public at least about you know kamala's economic policy and uh fetterman
01:28:32.540 has earned the same respect i don't have to agree with him but when he says something to me i generally
01:28:39.260 think that's his actual real opinion do you have the same feeling very rare this is not something you
01:28:47.420 see in politicians very often um i see it with thomas massey right so fetterman is not the only one if
01:28:55.260 thomas massey says something i think oh that's actually his actual opinion he's not changing it to make me
01:29:01.340 happy that's just his actual opinion fetterman same thing so now put it all together there's only one
01:29:09.020 state that matters and the most influential person in that state is fetterman
01:29:16.780 he gets to decide who the next president is
01:29:21.580 because if fetterman decided not to come out strong for harris
01:29:25.580 for any reason that could be the difference if he decided to say you know what the harris
01:29:36.140 group is so bad about israel that i'm going to take a pass on endorsing her and he might
01:29:43.660 that is absolutely within the realm of possibility that he would just say you know i got this one issue
01:29:49.740 it's so bad that i you know i prefer democrats being in charge but i can't even
01:29:55.180 endorse you for that maybe so it's more it's far more likely that fetterman will you know promote
01:30:03.980 a democratic victory so that's probably the way it'll go but i want to add something here that
01:30:12.220 seems like it's unrelated but it's more of a warning i was watching a little history thing on
01:30:19.580 youtube about how president xi of china rose to power because i was always curious about that weren't you
01:30:27.660 like yeah how does one person out of all the people in china rise to power well it turns out he was
01:30:34.540 something called a princeling a princeling would be the i think mostly had to be a son because prince
01:30:44.060 um a son of one of the few survivors of the um in the days of mao when mao had a you know big military
01:30:55.900 force but he was under retreat and they were all dying from starvation and everything and starting
01:31:01.980 from i don't know 80 000 people in his military um 90 of them died so there were like 8 000 people who
01:31:10.620 became somewhat famous within china for having survived this long deadly march and then their
01:31:19.340 children so the people who survived were promoted by mao as the awesome people because you know they
01:31:26.460 were the most loyal and had the most suffering and then their children the children of the people that
01:31:32.780 mao said were the most awesome they were called the princelings so it wasn't too hard for
01:31:40.940 president chi when he was a younger man to get noticed because it was easy to notice a princeling
01:31:49.660 and then he did this clever play where he went for political office in rural less important parts of
01:31:57.420 china and because it was a rural less important political part of china and he shows up as a princeling
01:32:04.940 well he won you know at low office in an unimportant place but then he used that victory and that
01:32:11.660 experience to go to another place in china that maybe was a little bit more important and now he's got
01:32:17.740 experience and he's a princeling so he wins again so he simply was good at his job but he had that little
01:32:25.980 princeling thing to always boost him so then he gets all the way to um you know being in the small group of
01:32:33.820 people who are running the whole country and he's the the leader but it's a very shared power situation
01:32:42.220 so prior to his rise china had a you know the group of people the polar bear or whoever they were
01:32:49.020 so it was sort of a shared management and it was designed that way it was designed so one person
01:32:54.620 didn't run everything um before the head the head of china was in charge of the military for sure
01:33:03.820 but a lot of other things were handled by other experts that were chosen for their expertise
01:33:10.620 so how did she get rid of all the competition the trick he used if i understand it correctly i'll
01:33:19.500 take a fact check on this if there are any historians who think i got it wrong because
01:33:23.260 that might but here's the trick once he had power but not complete power what he did to get complete
01:33:31.420 power was he tried to crack down on corruption now who's against that everybody likes that right
01:33:40.540 gonna crack down on corruption guess who were corrupt well turns out that the corrupt people
01:33:47.500 coincidentally were the people who were not his allies so he got rid of all the corrupt people
01:33:55.420 who were not his allies and replaced them with non-corrupt people who were also his allies who may have
01:34:01.980 been corrupt we don't know about that so here's the thing to watch out for if your leader is
01:34:10.380 is taking people off the board it's a consolidation of power and the fact that it happened in china and he
01:34:21.580 became the basically president for life so he took a a non-dictator situation and he just turned it into
01:34:30.380 one and the only trick he had to do was to say he was fighting corruption that's all it took now
01:34:39.660 obviously he had to also be in charge of the people with guns because it's people with guns who
01:34:44.860 arrest people right so he so he had to be in charge of people who had some force and then he just made up a
01:34:51.660 reason that all of his all of his uh non-allies were criminals they just restable now that sounds a lot like
01:35:02.460 the democrats are saying that the insurrectionists on january 6th
01:35:07.740 needed to be arrested and everybody who supported them should be banned from polite society if not
01:35:13.820 arrested they should be at least you know disgraced and disallowed from ever being in government
01:35:20.620 so you should never be allowed to be in government if you ever supported those damn insurrectionists
01:35:27.180 that's president she's play you you color all the people who are on the other team as criminals
01:35:35.900 so where president she said they're corrupt the democrats said they're insurrectionists and white
01:35:45.260 supremacists it's the same play now it hasn't succeeded yet because trump's still alive
01:35:54.460 barely because somebody missed that's it if trump is if trump leaves the field unfortunately you know
01:36:07.180 it could be the bad way
01:36:11.100 the democrats may be very close to having something like permanent power but changing
01:36:16.060 out the figurehead now and then so we wouldn't even know who the permanent power was
01:36:20.380 so here's the thing to watch out for if the people in power who can control the people with guns
01:36:26.940 which is what anybody in power can do and they say that everybody on the other side
01:36:32.300 the people who are not their allies have some kind of criminal thing in common
01:36:38.140 you're heading to a dictatorship and it sure feels like that's happening here
01:36:44.060 and all the cancellations and the um you know the the jailings they all feel like they're just taking
01:36:54.060 critics off the board and you probably have noticed that the people who made the biggest impact
01:37:00.700 are the people targeted the hardest the people who don't move the needle don't need to be targeted
01:37:07.100 but a lot of other people sure are so keep that in mind that's all i got for today i'm going to talk to
01:37:14.860 the uh people on locals privately um i should tell you that uh uh the the dilbert reborn comic strip
01:37:25.660 which you can only see by subscription on x or on the locals platform where you also get some political
01:37:31.260 stuff so if you just want the comic get it on x um dog burr is starting his own polling company
01:37:39.980 and yes he is making up all of his data so you might enjoy that anyway um that's it for
01:37:47.420 the regular show i'm gonna go talk to the locals now thanks for joining everybody sorry i went late