Episode 2611 CWSA 09⧸28⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 16 minutes
Words per Minute
146.67754
Summary
Dilbert and Dogbert have a fight with a pack of wolves. Scott Adams talks about the problems with the election system. Plus, a new study that proves coffee is making you more testosterone. And a new T-shirt that makes you a better t-shirt maker.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
All right. Well, if you didn't notice, the Dilbert comic is up. It's the Dilbert Reborn comic.
00:00:07.780
Now, normally, Dilbert, well, not normally, the Dilbert comic and the Dilbert Reborn comic,
00:00:13.380
typically, they don't do any politics. So this isn't really politics. It's just Dogbert
00:00:21.200
picking up on a meme. But I thought you'd like it. Let me read it to you in case you're listening.
00:00:27.300
Dogbert says to Dilbert, they're just sitting around the breakfast table, and Dilbert says,
00:00:33.060
I'm sorry, Dogbert says, when the hunter's bullet grazed my ear, I dropped to the ground out of
00:00:37.800
instinct. Then I jumped up and looked at the pack of wolves I had come to lead and yelled,
00:00:43.540
bite, bite, bite. And he's raising his fist like Trump did. Your story, and then Dilbert says,
00:00:49.780
your story is inspiring, but derivative. And Dogbert says, I didn't want to reinvent the wheel.
00:00:55.200
I mean, stick with what works, right, people? Stick with what works. Anyway, that's available only
00:01:02.460
on the, yeah, you have to subscribe to see Dilbert Reborn. Either on the Locals platform,
00:01:11.760
scottadams.locals.com, or, or, where's the show? I'm trying to open it. Here it is.
00:01:18.700
Huh. Or you can see it on the X, the X platform if you subscribe.
00:01:34.660
Oh, by the way, the 2025 Dilbert calendar is available for presale. The desk, page a day desk
00:01:40.900
calendar, made in America for the first time. And it's at, if you go to Dilbert.com, you'll see the
00:01:47.040
link for a presale. It's the only place you can get it. It's not going to be on Amazon.
00:01:51.600
Not now or ever. And it won't be in bookstores. Only one link. It's the only way you can get it.
00:02:00.040
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the greatest experience of your life.
00:02:10.440
If you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can really understand with their tiny,
00:02:14.860
shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or
00:02:23.440
a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:02:28.900
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing
00:02:32.580
that makes everything better. It's called the Simultaneous Sip. And it happens now. Go.
00:02:45.400
I wonder if the coffee is making me healthier. Well, there's a new study that's discussed in Brink Zone
00:02:52.600
that coffee increases your testosterone and your anaerobic power. That's right. A little bit of
00:02:59.980
coffee and you'll be stronger and have more testosterone. You want me to prove it? Watch this.
00:03:05.820
All right. This is really good fabric on this T-shirt and I didn't want to hurt it anyway,
00:03:14.400
but trust me, I could have if I tried a little harder.
00:03:21.440
Well, here's the kind of stories I see every day lately. So the Michigan mail-in ballots
00:03:27.580
are now only going to be counted if there's a proof of signature. This is a gateway pundit reporting this
00:03:33.880
to which I said to myself, wait a minute. Are you telling me that in the past, the Michigan
00:03:40.460
mail-in ballots didn't need any signature verification? The most basic thing you would do?
00:03:48.660
No, no. And wait a minute, wait a minute. Are you telling me that they're only just barely
00:03:55.200
fixing this in time for the election? That's right. Just a few weeks before the actual election.
00:04:03.040
But thank goodness, thank goodness there's no other irregularity to report about the election.
00:04:13.200
Well, Jim Jordan has accused the Department of Homeland Security Secretary of
00:04:17.980
Stonewalling the Ohio Election Integrity, according to a raw story. So Jim Jordan says the Homeland Security
00:04:27.100
is refusing to respond to requests from Ohio's top election official for federal citizenship verification records.
00:04:35.820
I guess I want to make sure that the people who are voting are citizens, but the Department of Homeland Security
00:04:41.820
is stonewalling them. Do you know how many stories I see every day, almost all of them on X, about something
00:04:52.620
that is clearly broken in our election system and somebody is trying to fix it? Now, sometimes successfully,
00:04:59.980
sometimes they get stonewalled. But if we have a pristine election system that we are quite all sure
00:05:07.980
has been perfect, why are so many things getting fixed? Do people who we elect in various states,
00:05:18.940
are they so dumb that they don't know the elections are perfect the way they are, and they think they're
00:05:24.860
fixing something that ain't broke? Or is it stuff that's really obviously broken, and was obviously
00:05:33.020
broken before? And yet, the news that you thought was real told you, well, we know those elections were
00:05:40.380
good. Yeah, you can know what you don't know. That's what the news told you. Here's a list of things that
00:05:47.820
can't be known that we know. But wait, that can't be known. Yeah, but we know it. Right, but there isn't any
00:05:55.420
way to know it. But we know it. Well, how do you know it? Well, we didn't look into it. No, not looking
00:06:03.100
into it is not how you know things. Well, well, there were no complaints that we saw. But you just
00:06:09.660
said you didn't look into it. That's right. So if you don't look into it, you can be sure what happened?
00:06:17.580
Exactly. And that's actually what the news has been telling us for years. And people just said at home
00:06:26.380
going, uh-huh, uh-huh. Didn't look into it. Must be a good election. I can think of no better
00:06:35.100
evidence of a good election than we didn't really look into it. I went, oh, by the way,
00:06:40.060
it's designed so you can't fully audit it. Yeah, just normal stuff. Nothing to be concerned about.
00:06:47.580
How many Democrats will hear either of those stories today? How many Democrats are going to
00:06:54.460
hear about Michigan not checking signatures in the past? Oh, my God. Or that we're not entirely sure
00:07:04.300
who are citizens and should be able to vote. Do you think any Democrats will hear that? No. No. It'll be
00:07:11.180
basically zero. Let's see. What does the public think about election integrity? Well,
00:07:18.060
it used to be that Republicans were confident in the system and Democrats thought it might be a
00:07:24.380
little sketchy. But according to Gallup, that is somewhat reversed. And now the Republicans think
00:07:29.820
the elections are more sketchy than the Democrats. But both sides think they're a little bit sketchy.
00:07:35.500
So 57% of those polled by Gallup said that they will be only somewhat confident in the accuracy of the
00:07:45.900
election, where 24% say they're not too confident and a whopping 19% say they're not confident at all.
00:07:52.460
I would have added those two together. But only 57% of the public thinks they're very or even somewhat
00:08:00.220
confident in the results. Does that sound about right to you? Does that sound like a system that's
00:08:09.020
been designed to make us confident that we know what happened? No, I don't think you can get to
00:08:15.900
only 57% think the election is fair and reliable. Unless it's designed to keep you from knowing who won.
00:08:28.060
Our elections, let me say it again, are very obviously designed so you don't know who won.
00:08:37.340
I think that's the only thing you need to know. If you spend a few minutes looking at the design of
00:08:42.700
the system, and then I said to you, all right, would you know if the post office threw away some ballots?
00:08:49.820
No, you wouldn't. How would you know that? How would you catch that in an audit? There's no way to catch
00:08:57.100
that. No, it's uncatchable. If I told you that a state actor, whether it's the CIA or some other country,
00:09:05.020
had worked with an insider at one of the voting machines or tabulator companies and had hacked it
00:09:11.180
with the help of an insider to cover up any trail, would you be able to spot that? No, no, you wouldn't.
00:09:19.820
No, there's no way you could catch that. What would be the most obvious way that anybody
00:09:24.940
would cheat? Well, one of those ways. How about if somebody was a non-citizen and yet they had a
00:09:34.620
they got a mail-in vote and then they voted? What part of the process checks all those names
00:09:41.260
against real voters? Well, maybe some states do, but not all of them. So the most obvious ways that
00:09:51.020
anybody would think of, you know, if you were going to think of a way to cheat, none of them are
00:09:56.220
checkable. The most obvious ways you would cheat. And so to imagine that you could know
00:10:01.500
who won an election is, is sort of just naive. Yeah. But there we are. So you then did a fact
00:10:13.180
check on Kamala Harris's claims about manufacturing jobs. So she said something about Trump being bad
00:10:21.980
and losing manufacturing jobs and Biden being good and getting them back. But apparently it was just
00:10:27.100
wildly, you know, incorrect, just a lie basically. But CNN fact check them. Now, here's my question.
00:10:35.820
Have you noticed the selectivity of CNN's fact checking? How many, how many votes do you think
00:10:44.700
got changed because somebody exaggerated or had a wrong data about manufacturing? None, none.
00:10:53.260
No, even if the Democrats heard that this was a fake claim and it was a lie, there's probably not
00:11:02.380
even one Democrat who's going to change their vote because somebody exaggerated or, you know,
00:11:08.780
said something about manufacturing jobs. You've got two candidates who both say they want to bring
00:11:14.300
manufacturing back to the US. Both of them are going to use hyperbole about their numbers. Both of them
00:11:20.220
are going to choose a period of time that makes their thing look good. Both of them are going to
00:11:25.420
bad things. It has no effect on the actual outcome of the vote. Now, you know it would
00:11:32.700
if they fact checked the hoaxes. If they fact checked all the hoaxes every time she used one,
00:11:39.980
Because nobody, nobody thinks that an ordinary lie told by a politician is, you know, different
00:11:49.340
or even noteworthy or nobody cares. It's just part of the process. But if you told, if you told the CNN
00:11:57.180
and MSNBC viewers that their entire worldview was created by a mesh network of hoaxes that the media creates,
00:12:08.540
that would change some votes, because we saw it. A number of the people who said,
00:12:15.420
I've been a lifetime Democrat, but I changed my vote. The number one thing they point out is,
00:12:22.060
what's the number one thing that people mention when they say they changed to give up the Democrats?
00:12:28.700
The fine people hoax. The fine people hoax is the tentpole hoax, meaning it's the one that keeps all
00:12:37.260
the other hoaxes alive. If you believed the fine people hoax, then you accepted as a given that Trump
00:12:45.500
was the worst person in the world and would say any crazy thing. Now, since the fine people hoax is not true,
00:12:53.980
then suddenly all the other hoaxes, once you learn it's not true and how they did it and how
00:12:58.940
and how blatantly it was done. I think the thing about the fine people hoax is that you didn't have
00:13:03.740
to really do research to find out it was a lie and that the entire left leaning media landscape were all
00:13:11.740
in on it. They all knew the truth because they had the video too. So that one's a real, you know,
00:13:18.780
that one just makes your brain go, wait a minute, what? How badly were they lying to me? Because
00:13:24.300
it's one thing when a candidate tells a lie, like I said, you just expect that. But when the entire
00:13:31.020
media landscape coordinates with the Democrats to tell you a lie like the fine people hoax,
00:13:37.820
that can change your mind. When you find out that you were a victim of that and that there are 20 more
00:13:44.700
just like it. There are 20 more. The fine people hoax was just the 10 poll. You still needed other,
00:13:51.180
you know, polls to hold things up. But the main 10 poll was that one. And I like to say that I'm
00:14:00.940
happy that I worked for seven years to debunk it. You know, Steve Cortez, Joel Pollack, we all worked,
00:14:09.020
like the three of us just like work like maniacs for three years, every time that popped up to make
00:14:14.140
sure that people saw the counter, you know, the debunk. Anyway, Harris goes to the border, which gives,
00:14:22.940
I don't think anybody's having more fun in the last few months than Scott Jennings, who is, I guess he
00:14:29.740
would represent the Republican opinion on CNN. Now, I'd like to give CNN a little bit of credit.
00:14:35.820
But I think it's prudent to call balls and strikes and not just be, you know, in the bag for one team
00:14:43.260
completely. So the fact that Scott Jennings is not only very effective in his communications on behalf
00:14:52.140
of Republicans, but he does get a lot of screen time. He gets a lot of screen time. He shows up in
00:14:57.580
clips and he's doing a hell of a job. If you haven't watched any of Scott Jennings
00:15:04.540
debunking of the CNN people while they watch, you have to watch it, not just for what he says,
00:15:11.420
because he does a great job of framing things, but you have to watch the faces of the panelists
00:15:16.700
when they're forced to listen to the truth on CNN, because they all know they're liars.
00:15:23.340
They're completely aware of what they're doing. So when they give him time and they let him talk,
00:15:28.220
you just have to, I reposted a few in X, if you want to see them, you just have to see the faces
00:15:35.180
while they listen. They try to do the smug smile, but the smile says, I know you got us. It's sort of a,
00:15:44.540
you know, I'm doing an impression now. If you're hearing only audio, it's that the smug smile.
00:15:52.940
It's toothless. So a real smile shows your teeth. Usually here's a real smile. See, here's a real
00:15:59.820
smile. It's all teethy. Here's a smile that says Scott Jennings is making you look like you have a
00:16:06.860
brain the size of a squirrel and a million people are watching him do it while your face is on the
00:16:12.700
screen. Yeah. So that's the face when you're being dunked on by Scott Jennings on CNN.
00:16:22.620
I'm happy. I'm happy, but not happy enough so that you can see my teeth.
00:16:28.620
I'm so happy. Look at my smile. I'm not even bothered by it at all. I'm not even bothered by
00:16:34.860
being called out as a ridiculous propagandist right in front of the world. Look at me smiling.
00:16:42.540
It's not bothering me a bit. So that's hilarious. I recommend it.
00:16:49.580
Searchlight Pictures presents The Roses, only in theaters August 29th. From the director of Meet
00:16:55.100
the Parents and the writer of Poor Things comes The Roses, starring Academy Award winner Olivia
00:17:00.700
Coleman, Academy Award nominee Benedict Cumberbatch, Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon, and Allison Janney.
00:17:06.700
A hilarious new comedy filled with drama, excitement, and a little bit of hatred,
00:17:11.420
proving that marriage isn't always a bed of roses. See The Roses, only in theaters August 29th. Get
00:17:17.580
tickets now. Here's what Scott Jennings said when Harris went to the border. He said,
00:17:25.260
arsonist returns to scene of crime. I told you he's going to reframe it. Arsonist returns to scene of crime.
00:17:36.140
And we're done. I could continue talking about this topic of Kamala Harris visiting the border. But
00:17:45.100
everything I say is just going to fit under this one reframe. Arsonist returns to scene of crime. Do I
00:17:51.740
need to tell anybody that the Biden administration is 100% responsible for everything we see? Or that
00:17:59.580
she was the border czar? Or if you don't like using common words for stuff, just in control of things
00:18:06.300
at the border in some general way that never happened? Three and a half years of complete,
00:18:11.260
absolute failure to the point where it looks like intentional treason. We don't know that it is,
00:18:17.420
but it sure looks like it. You can't fail harder than she has failed and Biden has failed at the
00:18:23.100
border. You can't fail harder than that. And she returns to the scene of the crime like an arsonist.
00:18:29.660
Anyway, and Scott Jennings points out there was a huge tactical mistake to just make sure that
00:18:37.580
people were really paying attention to the border. While Harris tells you it's a giant problem,
00:18:43.900
well, you say, but you caused the problem. Why are you now acting like you don't know what caused it? And
00:18:55.180
why are you there? You should be hiding in shame for what you've done. And the fact that she went to
00:19:01.980
the border and simply made the border issue more prominent in the news? Yeah, that's what mattered.
00:19:09.740
What didn't matter were her clever little arguments and stuff about it. Nobody cares about that.
00:19:16.460
All they care about is we spent more time thinking about criminals coming across the border.
00:19:20.940
Now, as luck would have it, the ICE report came out at the same time saying that the number of
00:19:29.020
criminals, literally murderers and rapists, were in the tens of thousands. The ones we know about.
00:19:35.420
Imagine how many people that maybe murdered somebody and got away with it and still came here.
00:19:42.060
So at the same time, the public is being exposed, we hope. Maybe no Democrats ever saw that data.
00:19:48.300
But it was national news, at least on the right. And I think Scott Jennings mentioned these numbers,
00:19:53.820
too. So he penetrated the CNN audience with that. So at the same time, we're seeing massive,
00:20:00.220
unreported, until now, numbers of criminals that we have deliberately, deliberately led into the
00:20:06.540
country. At the same time, we're seeing reports that ISIS, ISIS is sneaking people into the country.
00:20:14.220
At the same time, we're hearing that maybe, I don't know, Hezbollah or some other damn thing is coming
00:20:20.780
in with shoulder mounted missiles. And there's a bunch of assassin teams coming in through the border.
00:20:26.140
And there are tens of thousands of Chinese military looking people coming through the border.
00:20:33.100
We let everybody in. It's the biggest failure in American politics.
00:20:39.180
Yeah, let me say that. Let me say that with a little bit of confidence. In the history of American
00:20:46.300
government, opening the border, the way it was done, is the biggest mistake in American history.
00:20:56.220
If you could come up with a better example of a bigger mistake, I don't know. Now, and the thing is,
00:21:03.260
we haven't seen the price of that yet. The price is yet to be paid. Because we're letting in a whole
00:21:10.700
bunch of terrorists at the same time Iran is going to go to war with Israel, maybe. We'll talk about
00:21:16.380
that. And what would Iran do? What have we been warned by the people who know how things work in
00:21:22.380
this world? What is Iran going to do if, let's say, Iran itself is attacked as opposed to its proxies?
00:21:31.500
They're going to attack inside the United States. Your lights are going to go off. Because Iran is not,
00:21:38.220
you know, a Me Too follower kind of a country. They have abilities. They got skills. And they're
00:21:45.580
probably already in our cyber. They probably have already penetrated some of our systems.
00:21:51.180
They almost certainly have agents with weapons in the United States. Not that they're necessarily
00:21:56.780
going to do an October 7th attack. But they could certainly do things that we weren't sure if it was
00:22:02.380
them or somebody else. So it is, in my opinion, the biggest blunder in all of American government
00:22:11.260
history. I don't think there's a second place to that. And I guess what's different about it is that
00:22:19.500
it was obvious it was a blunder before they did it. I mean, it looks so much like somebody was trying
00:22:26.460
to destroy the country. It doesn't even look like this was ever a serious thing that somebody thought
00:22:31.100
was a good idea. It simply looks like somebody had a plan to destroy the country. I'll talk more about
00:22:36.220
that. Speaking of which, Harris looked at the Trump border wall. So she had to stand in front of the
00:22:46.940
border wall that Trump built, which at one point in 2019, she called it Medieval Vanity Project.
00:22:52.700
And now she is all about building some more. How do the Democrats not notice what's going on?
00:23:01.660
But they don't. They don't seem to notice. Anyway, former Navy SEAL Sean Ryan, who's got a podcast,
00:23:12.300
he was on Joe Rogan. And he said the Taliban is funneling terrorists into the U.S. to the southern
00:23:19.500
border for some kind of October 7th style attack. Now, I don't think Iran would want to do an October
00:23:27.020
7th in the United States. But ISIS might. ISIS might. So that's all coming in. And at the same time,
00:23:38.460
Harris has called for a pathway to citizenship for millions of the migrants she led into the country.
00:23:44.300
I don't know how you could be worse. To create the biggest blunder in American history and then to
00:23:52.540
top it by saying, let's give them citizenship so they can also vote.
00:23:59.420
The level of incompetence is way beyond anything I could call accidental. It doesn't look accidental.
00:24:07.020
Nobody could be this dumb. I mean, nobody could really.
00:24:15.420
So she gives a speech after she went to the border. And I would like to say, as far as I could tell,
00:24:22.620
when she gave her a speech, she was not inebriated. And I thought she did a great job.
00:24:29.260
So it was a teleprompter speech. At first, I thought maybe it was impromptu and I was more impressed.
00:24:33.740
But then when I looked at it, oh, it's teleprompter. But the teleprompter, she does really well now.
00:24:40.860
So I guess she's been doing a lot of practice on the campaign trail. But man, she read that teleprompter.
00:24:47.500
She did not cackle. She had all the right motions and everything. But I did note a few problems.
00:24:55.820
Oh, number one, if you'd like to know when she's inebriated and when she's not, there's a tell that is guaranteed.
00:25:05.100
All right. Now, I think you can tell by just the way she talks and everything. But there's one tell for whether she's inebriated.
00:25:13.260
And she definitely wasn't. She was in full control and did a good job in her speech.
00:25:17.900
Here's her hand gestures when she's not inebriated. They're crisp and they're smallish.
00:25:26.460
So she'd be like dupe, dupe, crisp, tight, controlled. So when she's talking, her hands are very much part of a good presenter's hands.
00:25:39.900
Now, I'm going to give you the impression of when she's inebriated.
00:25:44.860
Shoulders moving and hands are not tight. They're all over the place.
00:25:51.340
Let me tell you what we're going to do. Right? You watch for it. Tight hands, dun, dun, dun, versus loose hands.
00:26:02.380
If you wonder, is she sometimes inebriated in public, you only have to watch her speech where she's not.
00:26:12.940
Once you see her operating at 100%, as she was during her speech, there's no doubt that the other thing is inebriated.
00:26:22.300
There's no doubt at all. And you can even see that she's picking her spots.
00:26:26.780
When she does a national speech or a debate, definitely not inebriated. Not a sign, not a suggestion, not a hint, nothing.
00:26:37.980
But when she's talking to a friendly, a friendly, like a student or a little group of people who love her, she's drunk as a fuck.
00:26:49.220
We've seen this so many times, there's no doubt about it. Or inebriated in some fashion.
00:26:56.020
The other thing I haven't heard anybody say yet, but let me be the first to point it out.
00:27:00.740
So she gives a speech that was largely about her, you know, getting serious about the border.
00:27:07.020
Did anybody notice that the speech was all about her?
00:27:11.060
Here's what I expect when you've got a massive border problem and somebody's running for president.
00:27:19.420
I'm going to build a wall. I'm going to reverse the executive orders.
00:27:24.740
I'm going to get rid of this fake asylum thing.
00:27:28.240
So that's what you would say if you came there to tell people how you're going to fix something.
00:27:33.680
But she's got a little problem because any of those ideas, if they sound good, somebody's going to say,
00:27:48.280
So she can't really come out and say, here's a bunch of stuff I'm going to do.
00:27:53.600
The only thing she said specifically is she wants to create a path to citizenship,
00:28:04.700
The only concrete suggestion is something that whether you're on the left or the right,
00:28:10.960
you'd say, well, that's creating an incentive to come here.
00:28:24.380
Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:28:29.500
Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:28:37.940
But here's the part that once you hear it, if you listen to it again, listen for this.
00:28:47.680
The only time she talked about somebody else, she talked about the poor migrants,
00:28:55.360
What she didn't talk about is the pain and destruction so much that's coming on the American citizens.
00:29:15.260
Does that make you a little extra qualified because you've been in one?
00:29:18.000
You wouldn't believe how smooth the walls are of the tunnels under the border.
00:29:25.680
Well, you know, maybe it could be true that Trump is not aware how smooth the walls are
00:29:36.080
Well, Trump doesn't even know how smooth the walls are.
00:29:47.160
The entire time I listened, I didn't hear it all, but the entire time I did listen, she
00:29:52.000
only talked about herself and none of it was relevant.
00:29:58.120
So because you're a prosecutor and your entity prosecuted some people in this context, what
00:30:10.220
Do I not know that fentanyl is coming across the border and probably killed my stepson?
00:30:19.080
Do you not know the cartels are in charge at the border?
00:30:22.200
Do you not know that millions of people have come?
00:30:24.140
What is it we don't know that we're now educated because we know you were once a prosecutor
00:30:36.980
Meanwhile, the border patrol said yet another lie.
00:30:40.420
As with all things border related, she was nowhere to be found when we needed her.
00:30:45.560
She ignored the border problems that she created over three years and admitted that the,
00:30:51.860
and separately admitted that the immigration system under her and Biden was broken.
00:30:58.540
So she said she was going to fix the problem, but isn't that really admitting that she's the
00:31:09.380
Well, the Amuse account on X says that Kamala Harris did some election interference by creating
00:31:20.080
some campaign ads in which they had two people saying that they used to be Trump supporters,
00:31:26.160
but now they're in Pennsylvania and now they're not.
00:31:33.860
Well, they might vote, but they were actors who have always been lifelong Democrats.
00:31:38.460
So they got two lifelong Democrat actors to pretend that they switched.
00:31:46.800
How hard would it be for Trump to find some prominent Democrats who switched to him?
00:32:10.280
Trump would not have to hire an actor to say, I used to be Democrat, but now I just can't
00:32:29.740
I mean, I'm not ending, but this will capture my thoughts.
00:32:33.400
I think it's kind of stunning the degree to which Democrats have legalized crime while turning
00:32:39.660
the Department of Justice, who should be fighting the crime, into the criminals.
00:32:50.720
So here's examples of Democrats who are basically legalizing crime.
00:32:58.300
Now, that's a little hyperbole when I say legalizing crime, but I'll give you the examples and you'll
00:33:07.980
They wanted to stop arresting shoplifters up to a certain dollar amount, which caused
00:33:17.820
They're letting the homeless control the sidewalks with everything that brings with it.
00:33:22.380
They're creating an asylum path for migrants who are willing to lie.
00:33:26.780
The migrant process is a legal process, but not if you lie.
00:33:31.600
If you lie and say that you're coming for asylum, but you're really not coming for asylum,
00:33:39.560
They've essentially made it legal to lie that you're here for asylum because nobody's going
00:33:46.060
And it's the obvious way to go if you're coming in.
00:33:48.680
They created the sanctuary cities to thwart any legal processes about the immigrants, lie
00:33:59.620
So they lied about how much crime is coming across the border.
00:34:02.600
They allowed teams of assassins and terrorists into the country.
00:34:06.520
They are pushing DEI, which is literally legalized discrimination against white people, white
00:34:19.780
This is the Mike Benz stuff, where we know that the State Department and the Democrats get
00:34:26.800
European and other entities, Brazilian, to do the things that they couldn't legally do
00:34:32.720
So they just use external entities to put the pressure on, you know, X and other platforms,
00:34:42.760
That's, you know, they want to take your guns away, of course.
00:34:46.080
The rhetoric encourages assassinations, in my opinion.
00:34:53.340
They've got elections that can't be fully audited, which supports criminal acts during
00:34:58.100
And in Manhattan, apparently 60% of felonies are reduced to misdemeanors.
00:35:12.460
Now, some are always, I mean, that's not the first time that's ever happened, but 60% feels
00:35:24.920
So that's a case of the Democrats making effectively legal, not technically legal in every case,
00:35:33.000
but effectively legalizing crime across a whole broad range of important topics.
00:35:39.560
It made the entire country unsafe and inner cities extra, extra unsafe.
00:35:45.280
But at the same time that they were making criminals legal, they were making the people
00:35:51.920
whose job it is to fight crime, they turned them into criminals.
00:35:56.740
So they turned the criminals into legal things like, oh yeah, you could just say asylum and
00:36:06.180
Still technically illegal, but we're not going to do much about it.
00:36:10.500
So they legalized crime across a whole broad array of categories.
00:36:15.140
And then they took the people who were supposed to fight that crime and they literally turned
00:36:18.720
them into criminals because the lawfare against Trump, in my opinion, is purely criminal.
00:36:25.040
The J6 or, you know, the degree to which they were overcharged, in my opinion, is just purely
00:36:33.860
And they've canceled a lot of people for supporting Trump in the media and supporters.
00:36:39.560
And they've gone after his supporters who are trying to take him down.
00:36:43.020
And if you put all this together, it looks like a plan to destroy America.
00:36:51.180
Now, I usually avoid any kind of conspiracy theory that deep.
00:36:57.640
I try to, because when you just look at a bunch of patterns, it's easy to convince yourself
00:37:09.120
Let me give you, yeah, and apparently ICE has known, which means the administration has
00:37:18.440
known, they let in 663,000 people with criminal histories.
00:37:23.320
13,000 were charged with, or convicted of homicide.
00:37:30.220
16,000 for sexual assaults and 1845 facing homicide charges.
00:37:38.680
Now, speaking of Sean Ryan and his podcast, I'm going to ask you for a favor.
00:37:45.240
I watched a clip in which he had an author on just recently, Sean Ryan did, and I didn't
00:37:50.280
catch the author's name or the name of his book.
00:37:53.460
So if you saw it, and you probably did, or maybe you could Google it for me, could you
00:37:58.760
put it in the comments, the name of the author, once I tell you what the topic was, you'll
00:38:09.700
And here's a story that I heard from the author on Sean Ryan's podcast.
00:38:16.360
And I'm interested if you've ever heard this before.
00:38:18.680
So Obama wanted DEI, and how it happened that it was everywhere in the country was somewhat
00:38:30.520
So you've got a president who wants DEI to be a big thing, and he worked with John Brennan,
00:38:41.320
And the idea was, if you could get the government to push DEI, and to really embrace it, and also
00:38:48.660
you hire a lot of people for those agencies that are under the DEI umbrella, that further
00:38:55.600
But here's the part I didn't realize before, that if you make the government entities and
00:39:02.020
agencies all DEI advocates, they're going to force companies to be DEI, because those
00:39:09.460
companies need approvals and need to work productively with entities within the government.
00:39:15.700
So all you have to do is get the government to push DEI, and then the government will push
00:39:21.880
each of the agencies and people who have some control over individuals and companies can
00:39:31.820
And apparently John Brennan has said it's one of his greatest accomplishments, or the greatest
00:39:37.240
accomplishment of his career, was bringing DEI to the CIA when he was in charge of it.
00:39:42.540
And I believe that over 50% of the CIA now is women.
00:39:49.140
And that was part of his accomplishments, he says.
00:39:52.220
So when I look at DEI, which is literally illegal, that is tearing the country apart and has created
00:40:05.540
Not because of the individuals, not because of anybody's genes or culture or chromosomes or DNA or anything
00:40:18.120
It's just that the pool of applicants to fulfill DEI is smallish.
00:40:22.880
And if you have to do it, you're going to just hire less qualified people.
00:40:26.960
And what we should see under a DEI environment, within one decade, you should see every major
00:40:39.240
That would be the prediction that you could predict on paper.
00:40:42.920
And again, not because of anybody's DNA, not because of anybody's race or culture, nothing
00:40:50.120
It's just that if you force a constraint on a thing that's barely working in the first
00:40:55.640
place, which is the economy, the economy is always delicately between working great and
00:41:04.240
There's always that small difference between huge economic success and, well, that didn't
00:41:10.320
And DEI is by far enough to move you from the great economic success to everything fell apart.
00:41:28.220
We are in the predictable stage of everything fucked up because we have too many incompetent
00:41:40.440
Now, if you ask them, they'd say, we're trying to make the organizations look like America,
00:41:52.180
It's just if the only way you can implement it is a bunch of managers saying, I'm going
00:41:56.980
to get fired unless I hire somebody who's a DEI person.
00:42:00.440
And even if I can't find a good one, I'm going to have to take a chance until everything
00:42:13.500
Now, on top of that, everything's more complicated every year.
00:42:18.040
So in theory, an average person who could do a reasonable job at something no longer can.
00:42:24.500
So the complexity of everything makes it so if you're not in the top 20% of capability,
00:42:35.100
You know, back when, you know, you just had to milk a cow.
00:42:41.200
All you had to do is shoot an animal and skin it.
00:42:44.480
Well, most people could do it with a little bit of practice.
00:42:55.520
Anyway, Frank Luntz says that for the first time in a long time, there are more people
00:43:05.620
registered as Republicans than Democrats in the entire country.
00:43:21.880
Because you know what it is about Republicans that really stands out?
00:43:27.000
And I've always loved this about conservatives and Republicans.
00:43:31.980
They're really about just getting the work done.
00:43:36.460
They're not so much about making sure that everybody knows it.
00:43:41.200
So there's something about this number that says to me that Republicans just got to work
00:43:52.100
If there are more Democrats than there are Republicans, we're all dead.
00:43:55.460
And so, since the obvious solution to having more Democrats than Republicans is you register
00:44:05.840
Now, again, Scott Pressler gets a huge bit of credit for what he did, especially in Pennsylvania.
00:44:12.660
But there must be a lot more people working on this.
00:44:21.080
I'm not sure if what she's doing is directly or indirectly related to this.
00:44:26.420
Now, some of this might be that the Democrats did such a bad job that people are hiding as independents.
00:44:34.520
If Biden is just embarrassing, people will say, let's say I'm an independent.
00:44:44.840
Sure, I voted for him, but now I'm independent.
00:44:50.820
People just hiding because they don't want to take the heat.
00:45:12.720
These numbers can't be right because that would mean that the independents are.
00:45:19.860
I thought independents were about a third of voters.
00:45:25.040
The last time I saw these numbers, the independents, Democrats, and Republicans,
00:45:32.720
And this would suggest that there are very few independents.
00:45:43.220
My pivot is there's something wrong with these numbers.
00:45:45.420
It could be that they're only comparing people who registered one way or the other, which, you know, I would need more detail to know if that's what's happening.
00:46:04.140
What would that suggest would be the likely vote?
00:46:11.920
If there really are more Republicans registered than Democrats, who would win the, not the electoral vote, but the overall national vote?
00:46:22.980
It should be the one who's got the most people registered because that's what it's been before.
00:46:28.220
You know, there were more Democrats, and sure enough, they won the national vote, even when they lost the, you know, the electoral college.
00:46:37.160
So what would be the result, hypothetically, if these numbers held?
00:46:42.680
And let's say, let's say, independence, we don't know this, but let's say independence matched this, these ratios.
00:46:50.740
I think independence are going to be far more for Trump, but let's say it's just this much.
00:47:04.620
If Trump wins the popular vote nationwide, the electoral vote is a landslide.
00:47:13.240
Now, I need somebody smart to tell me I'm wrong about that, but I think I'm right.
00:47:17.380
So you've got the national polls, which, depending on how they weight things and how they ask the question and, you know, some assumptions that they make when they collect their data, they look a little sketchy, don't they?
00:47:34.980
Now, the national polls sometimes say Kamala's ahead, sometimes by a lot.
00:47:39.520
Sometimes they say Trump's ahead, sometimes by a good amount.
00:47:43.160
So the national polls appear to be completely funky and unreliable at this moment.
00:47:50.960
But do you think that we can accurately count how many people have registered as Republicans versus Democrats?
00:47:59.400
Yes, because that doesn't require an assumption, and it doesn't require any, there's not much room for weaselness.
00:48:08.260
It's probably just a data that you're either registered or you're not.
00:48:13.400
So if you're going to believe one, what would be more believable?
00:48:16.440
That the Republican registrations have surged, which would indicate a landslide for Trump,
00:48:22.060
or that the individual polls, which we've never trusted in the past and always seem to get mysteriously accurate right toward the election?
00:48:46.040
At Grey Goose, we believe that pleasure is a necessity.
00:48:49.620
That's why we craft the world's number one premium vodka in France,
00:48:53.060
using only three of the finest natural ingredients,
00:48:56.040
French winter wheat, water from Jean Sac, and yeast.
00:49:01.100
With Grey Goose, we invite you to live in the moment and make time wait.
00:49:15.480
the Republican registrations have now outnumbered Democrat registrations,
00:49:28.400
that we don't know if Trump will become president
00:49:34.960
it looks like there's no limits to what they'd be willing to do.
00:49:45.640
and it looks like a landslide if nothing changes.
00:49:50.780
So, here's what I think will be your October surprise.