Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2618 CWSA 10⧸04⧸24

00:00:00.000 For tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:09.180 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:11.700 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:18.040 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now. Go.

00:00:25.420 Ah, so good, so good.

00:00:31.000 I hope you all participated.

00:00:34.340 Well, is there anything coffee can't do? There's a new study that says it's good for your liver.

00:00:40.580 That's right. You may have noticed. Wow. Look at that podcaster, Scott.

00:00:46.480 His liver looks excellent, and it is. It is.

00:00:49.720 Now, a lot of people will just drink the coffee, but I like to take my liver out and just sometimes soak it.

00:00:55.220 Just soak it right in the coffee, put it back in, go about my business.

00:01:00.280 Well, here's a little update. I told you that Amazon was being difficult with my book, Win Bigly, which is all available now.

00:01:11.440 The problem was that they were okay with publishing the hard copy, but said that they would not publish the softcover or the Kindle version.

00:01:20.740 Does that make any sense to you?

00:01:22.320 That they said yes to the hardcover, and it was already available, and they said no to the Kindle and the softcover.

00:01:30.760 Like, nope. We'll not publish them.

00:01:33.040 It wouldn't tell me why.

00:01:34.760 It wouldn't answer anything personally.

00:01:36.480 And there's no way to call them.

00:01:39.540 What do you do?

00:01:42.440 If you're working with an entity and you can't call them and they won't answer email with anything but a canned response, what do you do?

00:01:49.600 So, what I did was I posted to my 1.1 million followers on X that Amazon was thwarting me for what could be a technical problem or it could be political, meaning that they just don't want that content because it's very pro-Trump.

00:02:11.120 It's called Win Bigly, the second edition.

00:02:12.980 By the way, if you look for it, it is now available completely in all of its forms, except audiobook.

00:02:19.480 I'll follow up on that.

00:02:21.260 But you can get it on Kindle and then Amazon KDP, which is a subset of Amazon.

00:02:28.860 That's the Amazon KDP allows you to publish as an independent publisher.

00:02:36.120 They said that they reviewed my request, and there was nothing wrong with it whatsoever.

00:02:42.360 So, the other two forms were approved.

00:02:45.220 Now, does that tell you that they knew in the first place that there was nothing wrong with them?

00:02:51.200 Because I didn't have to change anything. 0.97

00:02:54.400 All I had to do is complain in front of a million fucking people and tell them that it looks political to me, and all of a sudden there was no problem with it at all. 0.99

00:03:03.960 Went right through. 0.98

00:03:05.540 So, what's that telling you?

00:03:07.000 Well, I don't know.

00:03:08.220 There's no way to know for sure what that means.

00:03:10.000 But I'll tell you what it suggests.

00:03:16.640 Suggests they need a little work on their user interface there.

00:03:20.420 But also, did you know, and this is not on Amazon, only at the Dilbert.com, where you can find the sales link, you can get the 2025 Dilbert calendar.

00:03:30.820 It's the page a day one that goes on your desk.

00:03:32.520 But this time, it's got comics on both sides of the page, twice as many comics.

00:03:37.680 That's right.

00:03:38.820 Shipping is still expensive, but if you get more than one, it's kind of reasonable.

00:03:43.140 Please do that as soon as possible.

00:03:46.000 It's good for me.

00:03:46.680 There's a study, and study finds that maybe the best thing you can do for your brain as you're aging is to limit your glucose.

00:03:58.600 That's right.

00:03:59.660 The less sugar you eat, the smarter you'll be when you're older.

00:04:02.360 However, I've got this feeling that eating too much sugar is responsible for, I don't know, 80% of all of our health problems.

00:04:13.540 It feels like it's most of it.

00:04:16.160 You know, there's also the fertilizers and the, you know, the inflammatory things.

00:04:21.580 But I just feel like the sugar might be the big, big thing.

00:04:27.400 We'll see.

00:04:28.620 All I know is I don't eat much sugar, and I just keep getting smarter every year as I age.

00:04:33.820 So, anecdotally, it's very compatible with us.

00:04:39.360 According to the CDC, there's a record number of kindergartners, which is a funny word, kindergartners,

00:04:46.400 that had vaccine exemptions, according to Just the News, the news site, Just the News.

00:04:53.360 Now, here's the interesting part.

00:04:57.480 So, you know, RFK Jr. and a lot of folks have said, hey, I think maybe autism rates are caused by the vaccination schedule for children.

00:05:08.660 But how could you possibly test that?

00:05:11.800 It was an untestable proposition.

00:05:13.540 Because it would be considered medically unsafe to not vaccinate a child if you're a doctor.

00:05:21.100 You probably think, oh, it's unsafe to do that.

00:05:23.380 So, you can't really put together an ethical gold standard, you know, trial with a control group.

00:05:31.280 Because it would be sort of unethical, according to current modern medical standards.

00:05:38.040 It would be unethical to say, all right, you group, we're going to pretend to vaccinate you, but they're not real vaccinations.

00:05:44.760 So, you can't do that kind of experimenting with humans, especially children.

00:05:48.800 So, how would you ever know if you're getting a better result with the vaccination versus not the vaccination, if there's no ethical way to test it?

00:05:58.660 Well, what happens if a record number of kindergartners decide not to get vaccinated?

00:06:06.000 Vaccinate it.

00:06:07.780 You've created a natural control group.

00:06:09.980 So, how long will it take before we know for sure, because we just study the unvaccinated, compare them to the vaccinated, control for demographics, because that's the hard part.

00:06:22.160 You know, it might be that the rich people are doing the anti-vaccine stuff.

00:06:26.740 So, you'd have to make sure that you can control for demographics and socioeconomic everything.

00:06:31.920 But we should very soon have all the data we need to know if the vaccinations are causing autism or anything else.

00:06:42.440 So, it's like bad news, good news.

00:06:44.420 Well, at least we'll have the data.

00:06:47.100 I'm sure somebody will lie about the data anyway.

00:06:50.020 So, Trump continues to talk about his idea of using federal land to build new cities, new cities.

00:06:56.700 And he's also using the phrase, the golden age, that if you elect Trump, he can usher in a golden age.

00:07:04.500 You might remember that around, I don't know, 2018 or so, I kept saying the golden age is coming, but instead we got a pandemic.

00:07:16.260 And the country went crazy because they couldn't handle Trump being president.

00:07:19.840 So, that didn't work out.

00:07:21.500 The first golden age, not really as good as it could have been.

00:07:25.120 But could we have one?

00:07:26.680 Well, it's possible.

00:07:29.400 I'm going to volunteer to design a city if Trump gets elected and if this idea of building new cities comes to fruition.

00:07:38.060 And here's how I would do it.

00:07:40.760 I would not be necessarily the designer because, you know, I don't have those skills.

00:07:46.360 But what I would do is I'd put together a team of people to help me design a city.

00:07:51.440 And the first person I'd add to the team would be an AI expert, somebody who could build a chatbot out of AI that would be the organizer for the project so that if anybody had an idea about any subset of how to build the city.

00:08:08.100 For example, let's say you had an idea for a new type of sewer system or a cheaper form of providing internet to the city, whatever it is.

00:08:18.740 So, you'd go to the page and you'd say, hey, chatbot, I got this idea.

00:08:22.880 Here's some documents.

00:08:23.980 So, I'll upload my documents, which are my argument for why you should use this new system in your new city.

00:08:31.160 And then the chatbot asks some questions.

00:08:33.880 You'd be like, okay, do you know what it would cost?

00:08:36.840 Has it ever been tried before?

00:08:39.180 Would it be possible to get craftsmen in every location that could use this new technology?

00:08:45.100 How long would it take to train somebody to implement this new process?

00:08:49.360 If it doesn't work, is it harder to replace?

00:08:52.060 Can it be upgraded?

00:08:52.860 So, you could imagine that the AI would ask all the qualifying questions.

00:08:59.180 And then you can get all the best ideas for every subset.

00:09:03.980 What's the best way to build a roof?

00:09:06.200 What's the best kind of windows?

00:09:08.300 Just everything.

00:09:09.980 And then it would pick the top one to three best.

00:09:14.260 And then probably you'd want to get some human experts to look at the topics, just in case the AI didn't do it perfectly.

00:09:20.640 And then you put together a team that says, all right, here's your requirements.

00:09:25.500 We'll build this thing.

00:09:26.280 Now, I've got one specific idea, and this is the one thing I think I could add to the process.

00:09:33.440 I think you have to design the physical city with some processes and systems and, let's say, assumptions about the people who live there.

00:09:46.300 And imagine this.

00:09:48.820 Imagine that you build 100 homes and then you introduce the idea, and of course, everybody would have to know this in advance before they moved in, that the rest of the homes would be created by effectively barn raising.

00:10:03.480 So the city would get together some night, everybody would pitch in, maybe the homes are made by Lego type snap together things, and they just build a home.

00:10:15.000 And that's your Saturday night party.

00:10:17.680 So people really bond when they have a common activity, and they're doing a project.

00:10:23.160 So you basically create a project that isn't too much work, because everybody just does a small part of the work, and you build a house, and in the process, the person whose home you're building maybe is serving sandwiches and making sure that you've got beverages.

00:10:40.740 Imagine how much you would bond with somebody if you helped build their house and they fed you.

00:10:45.440 So that's like the ultimate bonding experience.

00:10:49.800 And so you would get to know all your neighbors.

00:10:52.560 It would be optional.

00:10:53.980 Nobody would be forced to help, right?

00:10:56.180 If you've got a bad leg, you don't have to help.

00:10:58.840 It's fine.

00:11:00.080 And you would just keep building the city based on some set of standards.

00:11:06.380 But now that's just one idea.

00:11:08.860 The other idea would be that you design it so that any school systems,

00:11:14.100 and you probably have multiple schools just for the different ages,

00:11:18.160 the school systems would all be connected by a network of bicycle paths

00:11:22.020 so that you can always get from any school to any neighborhood and to any other school without going on a public road.

00:11:30.300 It would all be just bicycle paths.

00:11:32.640 Nice, well-lit, well-lit.

00:11:35.540 Imagine if any of you are parents or have been, imagine not having to drive your kids anywhere.

00:11:41.580 The kid just gets on a bike and goes to their friend's house.

00:11:46.060 They go to school.

00:11:47.200 It's well-lit.

00:11:48.100 It's safe.

00:11:49.380 You just design it with lots of security cameras.

00:11:51.720 Everybody's safe.

00:11:53.160 So you could design for, oh, here's another one.

00:11:57.820 How many of you have bicycles and enjoy riding bicycles?

00:12:02.380 Quite a few.

00:12:03.260 But there's no home that's designed so it's easy to store your bicycle.

00:12:07.040 Imagine how easy it would be if you had a little ramp up to a thing where it's easier to put air in your tires

00:12:14.060 because it's not a ramp.

00:12:16.240 You don't have to bend over.

00:12:17.860 Imagine having, you know, your own little garage that's just for your bicycle stuff.

00:12:21.840 It would be e-bikes mostly.

00:12:24.080 Imagine having a house that has an automated dog door with a little gated area that's just for your dog to do its business.

00:12:31.960 Imagine never having to let your dog outside.

00:12:34.400 It can let itself out.

00:12:35.400 Now, these are just examples.

00:12:37.940 But if you were to design a little city where the living style and the way people interact with each other is sort of programmed into it

00:12:46.920 and you make everything easy and cheap, the potential for a golden age is absolutely there.

00:12:54.920 Here's what we usually do.

00:12:56.700 We usually build cities around a technology.

00:13:00.320 Eh, that's wrong.

00:13:01.600 So somebody will say, um, I built a company that makes 3D printed houses.

00:13:07.360 So I'm going to make a 3D printed houses community.

00:13:10.640 Well, it might be kind of awesome, but if you're building it around the technology,

00:13:14.700 everybody who's ever worked in a big business that does any kind of product design

00:13:19.180 knows you don't build products around the technology.

00:13:23.180 You build it around what people want and then you figure out what technology can get it to them.

00:13:27.960 That's, that's, that's the success method.

00:13:30.840 So yes, golden age for new cities.

00:13:33.360 The most exciting thing I've ever seen in the United States.

00:13:38.220 Personally, there's, you know, I mean, there are lots of things that are bad in the bad, exciting way,

00:13:42.740 but in terms of positive excitement, building actual cities that are just awesome,

00:13:50.660 like nobody's ever done before, like no country could match.

00:13:54.800 That's exciting.

00:13:56.560 That's really exciting.

00:13:58.380 So maybe a golden age.

00:14:02.400 Google has an AI that you can use.

00:14:05.600 They've got a tool called notebook LM.

00:14:07.620 And apparently it's going viral because you can use it to set up a podcast where the podcasters are AI.

00:14:15.680 So you'll have two artificial AI podcasters and they have the whole show.

00:14:20.120 You can upload a document and say, all right, do a show on this topic.

00:14:24.800 And then the two of them would have this whole banter and they'd be joking around with each other

00:14:29.920 and you create a whole podcast.

00:14:31.300 Now I'm going to say the same thing about that, that I say about all AI art.

00:14:37.420 Nobody's going to care.

00:14:38.900 After you check it out just to see if it can do it.

00:14:41.820 Oh, wow.

00:14:42.680 That sounds like a little podcast there.

00:14:44.480 You're never going to listen to it for fun because you do not care what the AI say.

00:14:50.480 We don't care about their opinions.

00:14:52.500 We don't care about their art.

00:14:54.000 We don't care about their music.

00:14:55.300 Because why we care about art or AI or anything else is, although we don't say it consciously,

00:15:01.560 it's all part of our mating instinct.

00:15:04.040 So if somebody can paint better than you or sing better or dance better,

00:15:07.640 you're activated because you think, oh, there's some genes I'd like to get into my bloodline.

00:15:15.080 But the AI won't trigger you that way.

00:15:17.380 Well, there's a report unconfirmed that country's big star Garth Brooks has been accused of sexual assault.

00:15:27.700 Some woman says he raped her in an L.A. hotel in 2019.

00:15:31.860 Now, I looked into the details of the story because it's so important.

00:15:37.560 And, you know, again, the claim, which, by the way, I have no reason to assume the claim is true.

00:15:44.120 Remember, Garth Brooks is a citizen of the United States.

00:15:47.380 And there is one rule above all other rules, innocent until proven guilty.

00:15:53.680 Has he been proven guilty?

00:15:54.980 He has not.

00:15:55.920 He's not.

00:15:56.420 He's been accused.

00:15:57.580 So he's innocent unless something changes in the court.

00:16:02.920 But the story is that he was traveling and took somebody that worked for him

00:16:10.220 and said he wouldn't get him a separate hotel room.

00:16:13.340 And then at one point, he just appeared naked and started, you know, pressing himself upon her.

00:16:20.520 Now, how many times have you heard a story about some rich celebrity person who convinced some adult woman to go to a hotel room?

00:16:32.120 And then the first part of the story, you're already like, wait, what?

00:16:36.620 How did you get somebody to go to your hotel room when obviously 100 percent of everybody in the world knows that's trouble?

00:16:43.000 And you still got somebody to go to your hotel room alone.

00:16:47.420 Sure enough, turns out if you're a celebrity, you can get an adult woman to go to your hotel room and be inside the hotel room for extended periods, 1.00

00:16:57.480 knowing, knowing that nothing good could come from that.

00:17:00.840 And there's there's there's not the slightest chance that something appropriate is being planned.

00:17:08.020 And it still happens.

00:17:09.440 If you've heard the Harvey Weinstein stories, it's always some actress goes to his hotel room.

00:17:16.820 I mean, already you're like, what?

00:17:19.020 You went to his hotel room.

00:17:20.620 There was nowhere else you could meet to talk about your movie prospects.

00:17:24.580 And then the story always goes that the next thing, the whoever it is, it's they always appear naked.

00:17:33.160 Like, who does that?

00:17:35.580 If you were going to if you got somebody to your hotel room.

00:17:40.060 And let's say you weren't a celebrity and you were going to, you know, you hoped you could get busy with them.

00:17:45.660 Would your first move.

00:17:48.320 Be to come out of the bathroom completely naked.

00:17:51.600 Would that be your first move?

00:17:53.200 But apparently there's all these celebrities we keep hearing about who get a woman in their hotel room. 1.00

00:18:01.060 And the first thing they do is take off all their clothes.

00:18:03.540 You know, the guy who does that.

00:18:06.680 Have any of you ever done that?

00:18:09.040 Have you ever had somebody that you've never been physical with?

00:18:12.520 And then your first move is to take off all of your clothes and then appear standing there fully aroused.

00:18:20.240 Like, hey, baby, how about some of this?

00:18:24.360 Now, I don't know what Garth Brooks looks like without clothes.

00:18:28.160 And I also don't know what Harvey Weinstein looked like without clothes.

00:18:33.880 But it can't be your best look.

00:18:37.020 Like, I don't like I don't see that that's you know what?

00:18:40.560 She she doesn't appear to be into me with fully clothed. 1.00

00:18:43.640 But wait, I've got an idea.

00:18:45.980 I know how to get her into me. 0.99

00:18:48.020 I think I'll take all my clothes off and show her my big old fat belly. 1.00

00:18:52.660 Yeah.

00:18:54.020 So there's something about all of these stories that I don't understand.

00:18:58.620 Either all of them are made up and nobody ever did that.

00:19:04.160 Or here's the weirder part.

00:19:07.020 Sometimes it works.

00:19:08.860 Do we only hear the stories where where somebody complained?

00:19:12.860 Is it so common that the celebrity just drips and says, all right, let's, you know, let's get going.

00:19:20.480 Is it so common that there's just the one time you heard about it that somebody didn't like the outcome, but all the other times it worked out and everybody was like, oh, that was pretty good time.

00:19:31.200 It makes me very curious about the whole situation.

00:19:33.780 But we don't know what's true.

00:19:38.500 At Grey Goose, we believe that pleasure is a necessity.

00:19:42.200 That's why we craft the world's number one premium vodka in France using only three of the finest natural ingredients.

00:19:48.620 French winter wheat, water from Jean Sac and yeast.

00:19:53.820 With Grey Goose, we invite you to live in the moment and make time wait.

00:19:58.480 Sip responsibly.

00:19:59.380 Hurricane Helene is now the deadliest storm since Katrina.

00:20:07.580 Death toll is over 200.

00:20:11.100 I saw reports that there may be way more dead people than we know because communication is bad and the mudslides are going to be really hard to clear to figure out who's at the bottom of them.

00:20:23.180 But on top of that, apparently we have 370 substations for the power grid that were underwater or out of service.

00:20:34.540 370 substations.

00:20:36.980 But thank goodness we keep a reserve of extra parts for the substations.

00:20:43.920 So, you know, in case there's an emergency and you had like a big problem with a lot of your electrical grid, you would just take the stuff that you hold in reserve in case of emergencies and you'd move it into the grid.

00:20:56.920 So, we'll be going to Ukraine and taking it out of their system because apparently our excess transformers and such have been shipped to Ukraine.

00:21:08.780 Do you know why?

00:21:10.100 Ukraine had an emergency with their network because of the war and we wanted to back them up so we gave them our emergency reserve.

00:21:18.200 And then a hurricane hit and now we're not going to have electricity.

00:21:24.180 So, as much as I am always wowed and impressed by American ingenuity, I'm going to tell you something that just feels right based on having lived in the world and seeing how things work and don't work.

00:21:39.060 And I've been part of big companies with big projects, you know, installing networks and things like this.

00:21:44.600 If you tell me that there are 370 substations that are knocked down by water, water especially, and you tell me that we don't have spare parts and it could take years to build a spare part, just like one, I don't think they're getting electricity back.

00:22:04.700 If your impression of what's going on is, wow, this is going to take longer than normal to get electricity back, I don't think that's what's going on.

00:22:16.420 I think that the residents are going to have to leave.

00:22:20.060 I don't think they're going to get electricity because everything's covered with mud and 370 substations are gone.

00:22:27.380 You can't fix that.

00:22:31.120 If you don't have the spare parts already in the warehouse, you can't fix that.

00:22:36.360 I don't even think there is a path.

00:22:39.460 So, I'd love to be wrong.

00:22:41.880 I hope I'm wrong.

00:22:43.520 Like, I'd love to hear, oh, we just found another source for them or we use a different vendor or we pay it a little extra and they'll make them faster.

00:22:52.420 Maybe, maybe, but if you told me 370 substations were knocked down and we don't have spare parts, my first thought is you better move.

00:23:03.620 Like, if you can get to any kind of transportation, because that's not, the lights aren't coming back on, I don't think.

00:23:10.900 Now, I would love to see, ideally today, somebody in the news business talking to somebody who actually knows what the fuck they're talking about, somebody who's working on the grid, and ask them, 370 substations around, is the power ever coming back?

00:23:29.460 And, you know, of course, eventually it will, but we could be talking years.

00:23:33.280 We could easily be talking two to three years, I'm just guessing, before they have electricity.

00:23:41.800 And it might have been four months if they had parts.

00:23:45.760 Still, it would have been hard.

00:23:47.000 I mean, 370 stations, they can't even have that many people who know how to fix a substation.

00:23:52.760 How many people even would know how to repair a substation?

00:23:56.260 It can't be that many.

00:23:57.120 So, I have a feeling that the situation is way, way worse than we're being told.

00:24:05.320 Way worse.

00:24:09.240 There was a great thread by Owen Gregorian, you can see it on my feed, or Owen's, on the number of times that we've transferred electric transformers and that kind of equipment to Ukraine.

00:24:22.280 So, if you're wondering if I'm speculating about that equipment going to Ukraine, it's pretty well documented.

00:24:28.620 You can see all the instances in the thread.

00:24:32.460 All right.

00:24:32.820 Mark Cuban went on the all-in pod.

00:24:36.140 I haven't seen it all.

00:24:37.420 I've just seen clips from it.

00:24:39.660 And, you know, one of the questions was, how do you explain Kamala Harris being open border, the most open border person of all time,

00:24:51.060 and then suddenly going to, oh, I'm going to be tough on the borders.

00:24:54.560 And it happened kind of instantly when she looked like she was going to be in the VP job.

00:25:00.200 And Mark Cuban's responses to it and the other things.

00:25:07.660 Here's my take.

00:25:08.580 As much as we like to talk about public figures and their opinions on politics so that we can mock them or say that they're right or wrong or say that they have TDS or say that they're coming around,

00:25:23.100 I don't know that any of that applies to Mark Cuban.

00:25:25.340 Because, honestly, when I see him talking about politics, it doesn't look like he's trying to be useful and honest.

00:25:34.320 It doesn't even look like TDS.

00:25:36.700 It looks like whatever he's doing is he has reasons, I'm sure.

00:25:42.120 But we don't know the reasons.

00:25:43.720 But he's definitely not being in, let's say, a, I don't want to say dishonest, because in politics everybody's shading everything.

00:25:53.280 So that would be, it would be too far to call somebody dishonest in politics because it's kind of everybody.

00:26:01.500 I don't know what his game is.

00:26:04.380 But it's definitely not playing it straight.

00:26:06.660 What he's definitely not doing is trying to educate you or, I don't know.

00:26:14.380 So, I mean, obviously he has a preference for who wins, but I think all of his reasoning just follows from the preference of who wins.

00:26:21.780 None of it looks useful.

00:26:23.860 It doesn't even look a little bit useful to even understand what his opinion is or why he has it.

00:26:29.680 So, recreationally, he is certainly fun to watch.

00:26:35.360 So, I recommend him recreationally, but I wouldn't even get into the, I wouldn't even get into the weeds of why he's responding the way he is.

00:26:45.200 I mean, it just looks like trolling to me.

00:26:47.740 And it may be trolling with a purpose, but it doesn't look like he's trying to get into a logical and useful conversation about politics to help us all sort out what is true and what is not.

00:27:01.400 It doesn't look like anything like that.

00:27:03.000 So, but I don't think he has TDS.

00:27:06.180 I think he just has a preference and he is good at trolling.

00:27:13.180 Well, this is fun.

00:27:15.820 OMG, the OMG group, got a producer for MSNBC to go on a date.

00:27:24.920 This is how O'Keefe and his OMG group like to operate.

00:27:29.360 They meet all these people that they'll get on the hidden cameras by pretending to go on dates with them.

00:27:34.600 So, they found, so one of the OMG journalists went on a date with Basil Hamden, who's a producer for MSNBC show Amen.

00:27:46.380 And when he talks about MSNBC, he just says directly that what Harris's message of the day is, is their message of the day.

00:28:00.260 In other words, that MSNBC's job is simply just to boost the Democrats and that MSNBC actively pushes Harris's narrative to help her win.

00:28:11.360 And he said that MSNBC is doing, quote, all they can to help Harris get elected.

00:28:18.380 He says the network is operating as an extension of the campaign.

00:28:22.900 And he went on to say that MSNBC is indistinguishable from the party.

00:28:27.520 But here's the best part. 0.97

00:28:32.360 He said, the producer said, that MSNBC has made their viewers dumber over the years. 0.94

00:28:41.520 He actually said, he's a producer. 0.76

00:28:45.360 He's the one who decides, well, he helps produce what gets on the air. 0.95

00:28:49.280 And he says, directly, my network is making people dumber because it's just lying to them and telling them it's the news. 0.94

00:29:00.440 Now, you knew that, right? 0.95

00:29:04.640 If you watch MSNBC, CNN, and then Fox News, you get sort of the whole landscape.

00:29:12.940 I would say that MSNBC is in the bag for the Democrats in the same way that Fox News is clearly in the bag for the Republicans.

00:29:23.820 CNN, weirdly, at least this election, has been the most balanced network.

00:29:31.860 It's not anywhere near balanced.

00:29:33.740 They clearly lean left.

00:29:36.160 But they are allowing, CNN at the moment, is allowing contrarian voices.

00:29:42.940 And they're giving him time.

00:29:45.380 Scott Jennings is just tearing up the network.

00:29:48.040 I mean, he's their voice of Republicans.

00:29:52.420 And ever since they fired Steve Cortez for being correct, Steve Cortez had been sort of the Scott Jennings role.

00:30:03.120 But Steve did too good a job, so they got rid of him.

00:30:06.680 He did too good a job of defending Republicans.

00:30:09.400 Now, I think maybe the management has changed.

00:30:12.940 Because Scott Jennings is doing as good or better.

00:30:17.520 I mean, he's just killing it with viral videos of responses.

00:30:21.000 And they're letting him talk.

00:30:22.820 They're giving him time.

00:30:24.260 And they're giving him time on the most visible programs in their prime time.

00:30:29.500 And I'm going to have to, I'm just going to have to be honest and say I appreciate it.

00:30:37.140 So at the moment, CNN is, it's hard for me to say, at the moment, CNN is the least biased network.

00:30:46.920 Isn't that weird?

00:30:47.920 Isn't that weird?

00:30:51.600 But you have to give them credit.

00:30:53.660 It looks like they intended to find the middle.

00:30:57.980 They don't always do it.

00:30:59.460 But even Abby Phillip, somebody that you'd sort of identify with being in the bag for the Democrats,

00:31:08.800 has said directly that it didn't even look like Tim Walsh was prepared for the debate.

00:31:13.460 Now, when you have an opinion like that, he doesn't look prepared, that's not the news.

00:31:20.620 The news is people say they didn't like him.

00:31:24.040 The news is there was a debate.

00:31:26.400 The news is the moderators did or did not fact check him.

00:31:30.520 But to say he doesn't look prepared, that's an opinion.

00:31:34.600 And that's a very negative opinion about one side that you wouldn't expect.

00:31:40.800 So there's something happening that's a little bit positive.

00:31:48.020 Anyway, so it's fun to see the MSNPC, at least the producer.

00:31:52.360 And don't you assume that most of the people who work there are completely aware of this?

00:31:58.000 I think so.

00:32:00.040 Like, do you think that this is the one producer who knows what he's doing and all the rest are in some kind of fog?

00:32:07.000 I don't think so.

00:32:07.760 I think they're all completely aware of what their mission is, and it's just to help the Democrats by pretending to be a news network.

00:32:16.500 Anyway.

00:32:19.260 My most fun story of this October is Candace Owens trying to determine if Kamala Harris has any black relatives. 0.89

00:32:27.660 Now, I want to be clear, I'm not embracing this as true.

00:32:35.260 So, Candace apparently contacted one of Kamala Harris's uncles and gave him the name of the person who was supposedly Kamala Harris's grandmother.

00:32:48.300 And the uncle said he'd never heard of that name, doesn't even know who that is.

00:32:54.120 Now, if that grandmother was supposedly on the same side of the family as the uncle, then that would certainly indicate there's something strange going on.

00:33:03.940 Maybe some lies about heritage or something.

00:33:06.620 But since the part that I read didn't specify if this uncle was on the same side of the family as the grandmother, because if it's a different side of the family, you could easily not recognize the name.

00:33:20.840 So, I don't know if Candace has the goods. 1.00

00:33:25.080 I'm not convinced.

00:33:26.940 I'm not convinced she has the goods.

00:33:29.380 But she's gone pretty deep.

00:33:32.020 And she's got a story that hangs together.

00:33:35.660 You know, it doesn't have any holes in it.

00:33:38.620 I just don't know if it's true.

00:33:42.540 Wouldn't that be the most amazing October surprise?

00:33:45.700 To find out if she has no black DNA in her at all?

00:33:50.840 That would be shocking.

00:33:53.440 Do you think anybody's ever asked her if she's taken the 23andMe test?

00:33:58.140 Oh.

00:33:59.620 Oh, I got it.

00:34:02.440 Somebody should ask Kamala Harris if she's ever taken the 23andMe test. 0.79

00:34:08.340 Or have her children.

00:34:12.120 Wait, she doesn't have natural children. 0.98

00:34:13.740 That doesn't work.

00:34:17.420 Wouldn't you like to know?

00:34:18.540 Hey, Kamala, can you show us your 23andMe test?

00:34:23.400 Because that would answer it, right?

00:34:25.120 There would be no ambiguity if you had the DNA.

00:34:28.940 So, do you think that...

00:34:30.960 Well, let me ask.

00:34:31.800 How many of you have ever taken a 23andMe test?

00:34:35.060 It's quite a few people.

00:34:38.020 I have.

00:34:39.360 I've done it.

00:34:40.080 So, wouldn't you love to know if she's ever taken the test?

00:34:45.540 She could put the whole thing to rest, like Pocahontas did. 1.00

00:34:49.340 Maybe not the way she expected.

00:34:51.520 Anyway, I'm going to put this in the recreational beliefs and anything's possible.

00:34:56.360 But I am not convinced.

00:34:57.720 I'm not convinced that Candace has the goods. 0.98

00:35:04.560 She might. 0.63

00:35:06.420 If she does, it would be just one of the greatest independent journalist scoops of all time.

00:35:13.280 So, I'm rooting for her because I like Candace.

00:35:16.640 So, I'm kind of rooting for her to be right.

00:35:18.580 But I wouldn't bet on it yet.

00:35:21.000 Wouldn't bet on it.

00:35:48.580 Well, according to Joel Berry, who's a managing editor of the Babylon Bee, but he had some

00:35:59.800 serious things to say, here are some things that we should know about overseas ballots.

00:36:07.860 As you know, you can vote in an American election if you're overseas, and you just have to go

00:36:14.880 through a process to get a ballot and send it in from overseas.

00:36:17.660 And, of course, we're all in favor of that because if we have military or ambassadors

00:36:22.540 or people whose job it is to be out of the country, we don't want them not to be able

00:36:26.760 to vote.

00:36:27.640 So, of course, we're all in favor of American citizens being able to vote no matter where

00:36:33.760 they are.

00:36:35.480 But, is the system that is set up to do that, does it have any holes?

00:36:40.940 Well, according to Joel Berry, managing editor of the Babylon Bee, here are some things you

00:36:48.580 may not know.

00:36:49.980 So, it's called the U-O-C-A-V-A, so that's the name of the program for the overseas voting. 0.58

00:36:58.920 Did you know that you can register to vote online without providing an ID, social security

00:37:05.400 number, or proof of citizenship, or even an address?

00:37:11.240 Now, I don't know how to understand that, except that anybody who's not an American citizen 0.98

00:37:15.820 could easily sign up to vote.

00:37:19.560 Is there any other way to interpret that?

00:37:22.480 All right.

00:37:22.820 Here's some other things you might want to know about those overseas votes.

00:37:26.740 You can register in any state at any address, and nobody verifies.

00:37:32.200 So, you could say you live in a swing state, even if you didn't, even if you're not an American

00:37:39.760 citizen, and the vote probably will just slip right through.

00:37:46.500 Did you know that many states allow you to send your ballot via email?

00:37:50.480 Email, email, not even physical, email.

00:37:56.060 So, does this tell me that in order to create fake votes for any swing state you wanted, you

00:38:05.240 could just get some foreign people to sign up on a website and send some fake emails?

00:38:11.020 It looks like it.

00:38:13.000 Now, I don't know if it's happening, but what would stop it?

00:38:17.940 Are there any red flags that they might actually be trying to use these problems in the system

00:38:25.480 to cheat?

00:38:26.940 Well, we'll get to that.

00:38:29.560 Did you know that a recent Democrat memo, this again, according to Joel Berry, a recent

00:38:35.240 Democrat memo announced their plan to collect 9 million overseas Democrat votes?

00:38:40.000 Out of how many?

00:38:42.940 So, they want to get 9 million, but out of what do you think is the total possible that

00:38:48.460 they could get that are overseas?

00:38:50.800 Out of 9 million?

00:38:52.480 Well, according to a federal government report, there are only 2.8 million eligible voters overseas.

00:38:59.620 So, the Democrats have announced in writing that they want to get 9 million votes out of

00:39:04.500 2.8 million people.

00:39:05.660 Now, remember what I always say about data?

00:39:10.740 You can't really trust any data.

00:39:13.040 Is it true that there are only 2.8 million eligible voters?

00:39:16.400 I don't know, but I'll tell you what I definitely don't believe, that there are 9 million.

00:39:23.080 Do you think there are 9 million voters living around the world who are eligible to vote?

00:39:28.300 Maybe, maybe, I don't know, 9 million?

00:39:36.680 So, that's a red flag that they plan to get more votes than there are people eligible to

00:39:41.680 vote.

00:39:42.420 In 2020, the number of civilian votes, so in 2020, remember that election that we weren't

00:39:50.700 sure who won?

00:39:51.340 What do you think was the change in the number of people who voted overseas through this program

00:39:58.360 in 2020?

00:40:00.080 Do you think it was about the same as always?

00:40:02.960 You know, kind of a baseline, normal, same as always.

00:40:06.420 Or do you think it doubled?

00:40:08.980 It doubled.

00:40:11.500 Inexplicably.

00:40:11.900 So, it doubled?

00:40:17.160 It doubled.

00:40:19.500 Is that because they did a better job of informing people how to vote?

00:40:24.460 Maybe.

00:40:27.340 Maybe.

00:40:28.460 I don't recall them bragging about their successful attempt to get people to legally vote overseas.

00:40:34.800 Seems like you'd be bragging about that if you doubled it.

00:40:37.340 Or somebody should be getting some kind of reward or, you know, a feature article about

00:40:41.960 how they really changed things with all their good work to improve the ability to vote.

00:40:47.220 But I don't remember that story.

00:40:49.820 It doubled.

00:40:51.000 Huh.

00:40:51.920 That was a red flag.

00:40:54.500 The Democrats have also spent six figures on the Vote for Marlora program to make sure

00:41:00.320 that everybody knows how to do it.

00:41:03.340 Did the Republicans spend any money on that?

00:41:05.420 Not that I've heard of.

00:41:08.600 Hmm.

00:41:09.820 Money can make anything happen.

00:41:12.240 Did you know that in 2020, remember, we're talking about getting 9 million extra votes.

00:41:17.720 9 million.

00:41:20.380 In 2020, just 44,000 votes across three states won Biden the presidency.

00:41:27.300 So we're within a few tens of thousands that will determine the entire race, in all likelihood. 0.78

00:41:34.760 And the overseas voting will overwhelm that number by, what, 10 times?

00:41:40.440 And none of this looks like it could be easily checked.

00:41:48.700 Do we have an election system?

00:41:52.360 What?

00:41:52.760 All right.

00:41:55.400 Let me give you the hypnotist take on the elections.

00:41:59.240 Now, I would be the hypnotist in this case.

00:42:02.120 Now, I have an unusual talent stack.

00:42:06.740 Now, this doesn't mean I'm better than you, because your talent stacks would be awesome for

00:42:11.560 other things that I can't do.

00:42:12.980 But just by coincidence, I have a background working in corporate America on pretty large

00:42:20.320 projects that had lots of moving parts.

00:42:22.440 And so you kind of get a sense of what's possible and what's not possible in the real world.

00:42:27.520 On top of that, being an hypnotist, I'm a little more keyed into brainwashing and propaganda.

00:42:35.420 So I'm just sort of primed to spot it.

00:42:38.340 So here's how I see the world in terms of our elections.

00:42:44.340 And I posted this.

00:42:45.440 If you want to see it, it's on my X account.

00:42:47.200 It's pinned.

00:42:48.280 So our national brainwashers, those are the people in, let's say, MSNBC.

00:42:52.880 They would be brainwashers.

00:42:54.940 Are so talented that they made most Democrats believe that we can know who won a national

00:43:00.900 election.

00:43:02.380 If you stopped any Democrat in the street and said, after an election,

00:43:06.800 do we know who won?

00:43:09.840 I think almost 100% would say, yeah.

00:43:12.500 I mean, there might be some cheating, but we'd probably catch it.

00:43:16.120 You know, we could always audit.

00:43:17.420 If it looked weird, we'd catch it in the audit.

00:43:19.820 So yes, you know, you could have individual, you know, little imperfections.

00:43:24.960 But basically, yes, you can know who won an election.

00:43:28.800 Is that true?

00:43:30.520 How many of you think that our system is designed in a way that it's possible to know who won?

00:43:36.800 It's not even close.

00:43:39.700 Now, I'm going to give you some argument for it, and I want you to fact check me, because

00:43:45.520 I might be wrong on one of them or more, right?

00:43:47.920 But just fact check me.

00:43:49.200 See if these sound real to you.

00:43:51.540 So I say our election systems are designed to make it impossible to know who won intentionally.

00:43:58.740 Now, again, when I say intentionally, here's the standard you use for that.

00:44:05.300 If something is designed poorly in the short run, that doesn't tell you anything.

00:44:10.420 It just means, oh, we didn't nail it this time.

00:44:12.720 We better fix it.

00:44:13.460 But if something is designed poorly in the short run, and then you check back 20 years

00:44:18.840 later, and it's exactly the same, at that point, it's intentional, because you know what

00:44:25.120 it's doing, and you could take it out.

00:44:27.420 You do have the ability to change it out.

00:44:29.320 So if in the long run, you don't change it out, well, then that's why you want it.

00:44:33.940 You wanted it the way it is.

00:44:35.640 So I would say it's somewhat obvious, and I'll give you more backing for this opinion, that

00:44:40.760 our system is designed to make it impossible to know who won, and that probably most of

00:44:46.740 the systems around the world are the same.

00:44:48.860 It wouldn't be unique to the United States.

00:44:50.460 Democrats have been brainwashed to believe that the courts can find problems with elections.

00:45:00.940 How do they find things that nobody found?

00:45:04.720 Because courts are not investigative.

00:45:07.520 They can only judge what is brought to them.

00:45:10.440 What if the nature of the cheating makes it hard to find?

00:45:15.520 Democrats believe that all cheating can be detected, and then courts can't.

00:45:20.460 They can effectively rule on it to make it right.

00:45:25.260 Nothing like that is even remotely close to true.

00:45:29.340 I mean, the direct opposite of that is very supportable, but the fact that a court could

00:45:35.100 tell you if an election was true, it's not even the right tool.

00:45:39.200 It would be like trying to be a carpenter with a piece of paper instead of a hammer.

00:45:46.500 It's just the wrong tool.

00:45:47.700 The court can only judge what is brought to them.

00:45:50.000 But if the cheating remains concealed, so that literally nobody can tell somebody cheated,

00:45:56.060 what is the court going to do about that?

00:45:58.540 And yet, and yet, the Democrats in this country believe the courts can tell you if an election

00:46:05.260 was real.

00:46:06.600 No, they can't.

00:46:07.760 If somebody could somehow collect all the facts and do it on time and they had standing and

00:46:15.840 no deadlines had been missed, yeah, in some real special case, a court could be involved

00:46:21.640 in fixing an election or repairing an election that had been rigged, but not in any realistic

00:46:27.580 way.

00:46:28.500 All right.

00:46:28.720 Here are the problems with why the court isn't really a solution.

00:46:34.020 Would you know if a postal worker discarded mail-in ballots?

00:46:37.460 I assume at some point in the process, the mail-in ballots end up in one box, you know, closer

00:46:47.160 to the time that they're going to be delivered to their destination.

00:46:50.200 So everything would come in from, you know, various places.

00:46:53.460 But then the post office's job is to sort out the incoming mail and put it in literally boxes

00:46:59.520 or bins and then when it's already, so when they go to your house, they've already sorted

00:47:06.160 your mail.

00:47:07.520 Same with the ballots.

00:47:08.940 So at some point in this system, there are big buckets of ballots and nothing else, just

00:47:14.240 ballots.

00:47:15.120 If a postal worker decided to throw them away, just literally just drop them in a lake somewhere

00:47:21.560 in a remote place where nobody would find them, how would you know?

00:47:25.420 Would the person who mailed them know?

00:47:28.060 I don't know.

00:47:29.540 Would, is there any system to know that something got lost in the mail?

00:47:33.820 I've never heard of it.

00:47:35.560 How would you know?

00:47:37.140 And it wouldn't be hard to know if a certain zip code was going to be more for Trump or

00:47:41.280 more for Harris.

00:47:42.420 So you just throw away only in the zip codes where you want to make a difference.

00:47:46.640 How would anybody know?

00:47:48.520 How about, uh, how about if millions of overseas ballots come in through that system I just told

00:47:55.800 you, and let's say 5 million of them were fake.

00:47:59.640 How would you know?

00:48:01.240 Well, you could know eventually because you could get people to search each vote and, you

00:48:06.800 know, do some sampling to find out how bad it was.

00:48:08.860 But the election would be long certified before that happened.

00:48:13.320 Long certified.

00:48:14.720 So that's not going to stop anything.

00:48:16.340 We're not going to take a president out of office after they've been certified.

00:48:20.480 That's never going to happen.

00:48:21.420 So that can't work.

00:48:24.760 How about, um, how would you know if some state actor, whether it's CIA or some other

00:48:32.260 intelligence unit, had co-opted an insider in any of our electronic systems and that they

00:48:40.860 had figured out how to tweak things so that they could change it without anybody noticing.

00:48:45.860 Now, that might require, you know, having a confederate on the inside of something, you

00:48:49.980 know, as well as outside, but how would we know?

00:48:53.640 We wouldn't know.

00:48:56.120 No, we wouldn't know if any, there's no way we would know if some things got changed and

00:49:01.620 then there was somebody on the inside who made sure you couldn't tell it got changed.

00:49:06.320 We'd never know.

00:49:10.080 How about if someone printed fake ballots and then just inserted them in the system, how would

00:49:19.360 you know?

00:49:21.420 Well, there are some kinds of audits and some kind of observers that might say, hey, those

00:49:26.840 look alike.

00:49:27.880 And we have those reports.

00:49:30.300 In 2020, there are credible, I believe signed under oath, reports of multiple people who saw

00:49:37.860 what were definitely, according to them, photocopied ballots that had been sent to the machines.

00:49:43.380 So was the election reversed?

00:49:47.800 No.

00:49:49.040 Do you know what the people who were accused of having photocopied ballots did?

00:49:54.700 They locked it in a closet.

00:49:57.200 And then when the court said, you have to unlock that, they just didn't.

00:50:01.880 And then people went back to the court and said, hey, you told them to unlock it and they

00:50:05.000 didn't.

00:50:05.480 So let's get serious.

00:50:06.980 And the court said, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:50:09.980 And nothing happened.

00:50:11.640 So we have we have the new election coming up this four years later and the request to

00:50:17.840 open one closet.

00:50:19.320 Just open the closet.

00:50:20.900 Can you just unlock this door?

00:50:22.920 It's the only thing we're asking.

00:50:24.200 We know where the door is.

00:50:25.680 We're looking at the lock.

00:50:27.320 We have a corridor that you can open this door and we can just look to see if those ballots

00:50:31.620 look OK to us.

00:50:32.920 And it didn't happen in four years.

00:50:34.600 So do you think if there are fake ballots that the court is going to sort that out?

00:50:41.160 No, the court told them to unlock the door and they just decided not to.

00:50:45.560 And nothing happened.

00:50:47.020 And here we are.

00:50:49.060 Now, if you live in the real world.

00:50:52.320 There's no way that the court could really help you tell if the election is fair.

00:50:56.500 They're just not involved yet and they can be ignored.

00:50:59.380 Bank more on course when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.

00:51:07.900 Learn more at Scotiabank dot com slash banking packages.

00:51:11.640 Conditions apply.

00:51:13.420 Scotiabank.

00:51:14.160 You're richer than you think.

00:51:16.840 How about.

00:51:17.640 Would you know the extent of ballot harvesting in states where it's not legal to do it?

00:51:24.660 Some states it's legal.

00:51:26.480 But if it were an illegal place, how would you know if one group did more illegal ballot

00:51:33.020 harvesting than another?

00:51:35.020 How would you know?

00:51:36.540 How would the court know?

00:51:37.680 If the people who did it don't talk, how would anybody know?

00:51:44.140 You would get the worst you would get like individual stories like, oh, this person collected

00:51:49.020 100 of them from the rest home.

00:51:51.000 So you will take the 100 out.

00:51:53.400 But what if thousands of other people got 100 apiece?

00:51:57.560 You wouldn't know.

00:51:58.200 How about if there are migrants in the country who, because they signed up for their, I guess, 1.00

00:52:08.240 driver's licenses and got automatically registered, how would you know if they voted?

00:52:15.760 Well, again, you could check each one individually and then you could do a sampling to find out

00:52:22.420 if, you know, you'd have to check each one to make sure they are or are not a resident.

00:52:26.940 But if you've checked enough, you've got a good sample.

00:52:29.320 And then you could say, oh, it looks like the illegal votes changed the election.

00:52:33.300 Do you know how long that would take?

00:52:35.780 I don't know how long it would take, but the election would be over and the president

00:52:39.580 would be office and in office and everything would be certified.

00:52:42.960 So you couldn't do it on time.

00:52:45.500 Even if you found a problem, you'd be like, well, better luck next time we already got a

00:52:49.960 president that's certified.

00:52:51.100 We're not going to take him out of office.

00:52:53.860 All right.

00:52:54.360 So with all of these things, this brainwashing, this is how the brainwashers can tell you that

00:53:02.540 January 6th was an insurrection.

00:53:06.240 Because the vital part of the insurrection narrative, which is totally made up, it's just a hoax.

00:53:11.100 The vital part is that the people involved knew that the election was accurate.

00:53:19.400 That's the opposite of reality.

00:53:23.300 The people who protested were sure that they didn't know the election was accurate.

00:53:28.200 In fact, it looked like it had problems just on the surface.

00:53:31.500 And then more importantly, Trump's entire jeopardy has to do with him knowing that the 2020 election

00:53:42.820 was fair.

00:53:44.680 And believe it or not, there's something in this Jack Smith thing, the new Jack Smith indictment.

00:53:51.360 And somebody characterized it, somebody on the left, characterized it as having proof that Trump knew the election was fair.

00:54:02.360 Do you know what the proof is?

00:54:03.740 I'm paraphrasing, but apparently there's documentation that says he said to somebody close to him, family member or staffer, that he didn't know.

00:54:17.500 He didn't know for sure that the election was rigged, but that you should always fight like hell.

00:54:22.460 And they said, okay, there he knows that the election was fair.

00:54:29.940 And I say, wait a minute, your explanation of what he said doesn't match what he just said.

00:54:38.160 If he said, I don't know if it was fair or not, but you should always fight like hell.

00:54:43.680 How do you hear that?

00:54:46.320 I hear it like normal language.

00:54:48.700 Here's how normal language works.

00:54:50.400 We have an election system that you can't tell if it's fair or not.

00:54:54.760 The unstated part, which is important, the unstated part is that it doesn't look fair on the surface.

00:55:02.120 So if something doesn't look fair and you can't tell, what is the smart thing to do?

00:55:09.480 Surrender?

00:55:11.600 Is that the smart thing to do?

00:55:13.760 Is that good for the country?

00:55:16.420 Is that patriotic that you're not sure if an actual election happened and it looks like it was cheating?

00:55:23.580 Just on the surface, it looks like it's cheating.

00:55:26.640 And you're just going to let that go?

00:55:28.520 If there's no way to know for sure?

00:55:32.860 That doesn't even make any sense.

00:55:34.740 So I predicted that the Jack Smith thing would make his case based on the fact that you can brainwash Democrats to believe that ordinary language is being used in a different way than it's ever been used in the history of people talking.

00:55:52.380 And that only Trump uses words opposite of what he says, so that when he says, go protest peacefully, he really means fighting.

00:56:02.540 When he says, find the votes, he means manufacture them as opposed to it's obvious that something got miscounted.

00:56:09.340 And now they're going to do that if you don't know if the election was rigged, you should fight like hell as proof that he knows that they were fair.

00:56:20.380 Where is that in his statement?

00:56:23.520 The quote doesn't have anything to do with an opinion about knowing an election was fair.

00:56:29.580 Knowing you don't know is reason to fight it.

00:56:33.540 So what Trump said makes complete sense to me and more to the point.

00:56:42.700 And honestly, this is the part that affects me the most.

00:56:48.580 You know, so this is not the logical part of the argument, but it's the part that affects me the most.

00:56:53.760 Who did you think you elected in 2016?

00:56:57.920 Did you elect the give up guy?

00:56:59.800 Did you elect the president who, as soon as there's trouble, he's going to roll over?

00:57:05.480 No, no, no.

00:57:07.920 Trump got elected because he's this guy.

00:57:11.320 He doesn't give up.

00:57:13.240 If there had been a way to know for sure that the election had been fair, do you think he would have fought?

00:57:19.440 I don't.

00:57:21.680 If you knew for sure that it looks suspicious, but you couldn't know if it was fair, do you want somebody who surrenders?

00:57:28.200 I don't.

00:57:30.820 I very much don't want somebody to surrender if it looks like they got cheated and you can't tell.

00:57:37.020 If it looks like you got cheated, it feels like you got cheated.

00:57:40.380 It doesn't match your anecdotal experience in life.

00:57:44.540 And there's something that's just glaring as a like, whoa, this looks a little weird.

00:57:49.160 You know, like maybe some victories in places that a Democrat never wins or never wins by this much.

00:57:56.060 You know, suspicious stuff.

00:57:59.140 You want the person who would fight that to the death.

00:58:02.680 And he's that guy.

00:58:04.380 Do you like how he did it?

00:58:06.760 Maybe not.

00:58:08.340 Do you like that he doesn't give up?

00:58:11.280 Yeah. 0.85

00:58:12.220 He took a bullet in the ear.

00:58:14.260 He's going back today. 0.94

00:58:16.220 Today.

00:58:16.980 He's going to be back in Butler where he took a bullet.

00:58:20.320 Elon Musk is going to join him reportedly.

00:58:22.480 That'll be interesting.

00:58:25.660 Anyway, Liz Harrington reports that Dominion has been using the same basic password since 2008.

00:58:33.240 If you'd like to hack their machines, the password is DVS-CORP08!

00:58:41.860 Not only do we know that they've been using the same password since 2008, we know the password.

00:58:48.360 So if you'd like to hack them, that's the password.

00:58:52.800 Now, I can't believe they haven't changed it since this became public, so probably it's not the password.

00:58:59.020 But anyway, and as a bonus, if you've been brainwashed into thinking we can know who won an election,

00:59:07.620 you probably also think that scientists can accurately measure the temperature of the planet,

00:59:14.520 even though the mechanisms they've used to measure the planet over time have changed continually.

00:59:23.120 Do you know why the mechanisms for measuring the planets change continuously?

00:59:29.840 Because they're not happy that the old methods were accurate.

00:59:32.500 So how do you compare the new temperatures to the old temperatures if the reason that you updated the way you measure the temperature

00:59:40.920 is that the old ones weren't reliable?

00:59:43.840 Well, you adjust the old ones.

00:59:46.920 That's right.

00:59:48.300 You adjust them.

00:59:52.140 Anybody who's lived in the real world knows exactly what that means.

00:59:55.580 If you don't have experience in, say, big organizations or governments or corporations,

01:00:01.360 and you heard that, well, we use new instruments to measure the temperature now,

01:00:06.060 but to make sure that they were also right in the past when we didn't have good instruments,

01:00:11.540 we're going to use an adjustment based on the algorithm and the averages and the assumptions.

01:00:18.160 No.

01:00:19.500 If anybody ever tells you they're doing that, 1.00

01:00:22.680 that's just such bullshit. 0.99

01:00:25.580 Now, can I get an agreement? 0.99

01:00:29.500 Those of you who have extended experience in any corporate, you know, big project world,

01:00:35.600 you back me, right?

01:00:37.400 That if you've changed the measuring devices over time and then adjusted the estimates in the past

01:00:44.040 to make sure it all worked out, you're not dealing with serious people.

01:00:49.240 I mean, that's just a scam.

01:00:51.760 Anyway.

01:00:52.180 As the amused count on X, and Musk was agreeing with this,

01:00:58.680 that apparently a lot of these migrants that are shipped into the country coincidentally

01:01:03.860 get shipped to the states that have the closest elections,

01:01:08.740 the ones where getting a few more Democrats voters into that state would make the difference, 0.98

01:01:14.680 flipping it to blue.

01:01:15.580 And once you see that it's very clear that they have targeted the swing states,

01:01:22.420 if this is true, by the way, this is a claim.

01:01:25.020 I haven't researched it myself.

01:01:27.580 But if it's true that they moved the migrants into the swing states

01:01:31.280 to basically turn the country blue forever,

01:01:35.100 then it's exactly what it looks like.

01:01:39.280 It's an attack on the country and the takeover.

01:01:45.580 Anyway, National Review has an estimate that says we spend $451 billion a year on illegals.

01:01:57.920 I've taught you how to look at data before.

01:02:01.400 This data agrees with your preconceived ideas that we're spending too much on immigrants.

01:02:07.020 So it's accurate, right?

01:02:10.960 It's accurate because it agrees with your point of view and it would help your argument.

01:02:18.360 Again, I've lived in the real world too long.

01:02:22.900 I haven't looked into how they calculated it.

01:02:25.720 But I'll make an assumption.

01:02:27.560 I'll make an assumption that they're measuring the short-term cost

01:02:32.680 and they're not looking at the 20-year, 50-year outcomes.

01:02:39.180 Because if you bring somebody into the country and they're in a bad shape 1.00

01:02:42.500 and they need a lot of help, they're just an expense.

01:02:45.600 If simply you added up all the expenses of people you brought into the country and needed help,

01:02:51.240 it could be $451 billion or some big number.

01:02:54.600 Maybe not that, but some gigantic number.

01:02:58.240 But how did they calculate how we turn out as a country and our GDP in, say, 20 years?

01:03:06.760 You can't ignore that.

01:03:08.800 Because if it's being done as sort of an investment,

01:03:12.560 and by the way, immigrants are an investment.

01:03:15.740 Because if you don't bring in all criminals,

01:03:18.200 you get a lot of people who end up paying taxes.

01:03:20.920 They have children who are citizens.

01:03:22.520 The children grow up and they pay taxes.

01:03:25.640 They're better educated.

01:03:26.980 The second generation is doing well.

01:03:29.440 So if you've watched me enough,

01:03:33.700 you know that I'm completely against open borders.

01:03:37.220 It's insane.

01:03:38.520 I mean, it's just criminal that we have open borders.

01:03:41.220 100% against the unrestricted borders.

01:03:44.960 But I also don't think there's a slightest chance that the National Review did the calculation correctly.

01:03:52.780 I don't think there's any chance.

01:03:54.980 Now, that's only because it wouldn't matter who did it, right?

01:03:58.260 If the Democrats had come up with a number, it wouldn't matter what the number was.

01:04:02.520 I wouldn't believe it.

01:04:03.340 So this is not really the sort of thing you can calculate.

01:04:07.540 But it might be true that we're spending a god-awful amount of money in the short run,

01:04:12.380 and nobody thinks that's a good idea.

01:04:14.820 Would you agree?

01:04:16.640 Yeah, I think we could still say, yeah, I would spend too much money.

01:04:20.460 But $451 billion?

01:04:23.760 I don't know.

01:04:25.080 Not buying it.

01:04:25.900 Ontario, the wait is over.

01:04:28.540 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.

01:04:31.380 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live,

01:04:33.640 bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.

01:04:39.000 Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting,

01:04:41.320 signing up is fast and simple.

01:04:43.440 And in just a few clicks,

01:04:44.720 you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

01:04:49.480 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots

01:04:53.300 that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity

01:04:56.600 at Golden Nugget Online Casino.

01:04:59.160 Take a spin on the slots,

01:05:00.500 challenge yourself at the tables,

01:05:01.840 or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action,

01:05:05.640 all from the comfort of your own devices.

01:05:07.840 Why settle for less when you can go for the gold

01:05:10.320 at Golden Nugget Online Casino?

01:05:13.120 Gambling problem?

01:05:13.960 Call ConnexOntario, 1-866-531-2600.

01:05:18.360 19 and over, physically present in Ontario.

01:05:20.660 Eligibility restrictions apply.

01:05:22.060 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details.

01:05:24.740 Please play responsibly.

01:05:26.280 Well, Hezbollah's had a bad week.

01:05:28.680 How bad?

01:05:29.940 Well, worse than any week you've probably ever had.

01:05:34.060 So, as you know, Israel blew up all their pagers 0.97

01:05:37.540 and took out a lot of the leadership,

01:05:39.680 and then they bombed the top guy,

01:05:41.440 and they took him out,

01:05:42.360 and a bunch of his generals,

01:05:43.680 and they keep bombing other people.

01:05:45.300 They took out the...

01:05:46.880 Now they hit some guy who's the head of communications,

01:05:50.060 communications, and then...

01:05:52.420 I don't know how confirmed this is,

01:05:54.740 but it looked like the person

01:05:56.480 who was going to be the replacement

01:05:57.840 for the head of Hezbollah

01:05:59.360 got his lieutenants together,

01:06:02.180 the surviving ones,

01:06:03.460 and they all met in an underground bunker.

01:06:05.640 Do you know how the rest of the story goes?

01:06:11.880 The leaders of Hezbollah

01:06:13.560 got together in an underground bunker.

01:06:17.880 It didn't work out for them.

01:06:20.240 Yeah, Israel bombed their bunker.

01:06:24.020 So, we don't know how many layers

01:06:26.180 of Hezbollah leadership has been taken out,

01:06:28.880 but I'm going to introduce to you

01:06:30.160 what I call the three-layer hypothesis.

01:06:33.260 I just made this up.

01:06:36.120 It's the three-layer hypothesis.

01:06:38.340 It goes like this.

01:06:39.500 If you have some, you know,

01:06:41.040 terrorist group or bad entity,

01:06:43.180 and they've got a leader,

01:06:44.560 like Osama bin Laden, 0.57

01:06:46.480 that might be the best leader.

01:06:49.240 So, maybe they're doing so well

01:06:50.460 because their leader is so good.

01:06:52.160 So, you take out the leader.

01:06:54.240 Ah, but unfortunately,

01:06:55.700 the number two guy

01:06:56.800 really worked with the number one guy,

01:06:59.560 and it's pretty good as well.

01:07:01.480 So, you got to take out the number two guy.

01:07:03.960 Number three guy goes in, 0.99

01:07:05.460 and damn it, 0.94

01:07:06.180 the number three guy was trained 0.99

01:07:07.480 by number one and number two,

01:07:08.880 also pretty good.

01:07:10.320 Pretty good.

01:07:10.700 Not as good.

01:07:12.040 Not as good, but pretty good. 1.00

01:07:14.500 So, you kill the third guy. 0.99

01:07:16.880 Now, you've got the fourth best terrorist. 0.99

01:07:19.900 In order to be, like,

01:07:22.980 a world-class terrorist,

01:07:24.880 I don't think you can be fourth best.

01:07:28.080 I think that doing something

01:07:29.500 as spectacular as Al-Qaeda did, 0.96

01:07:32.380 you know, in 9-11,

01:07:33.320 if they did it,

01:07:35.460 you need sort of your highest-end persuaders,

01:07:39.880 smartest people,

01:07:40.780 and there aren't many of them.

01:07:42.460 You know, that's why there aren't

01:07:44.600 a lot of Al-Qaeda's,

01:07:46.200 because it's hard to get that charismatic,

01:07:48.560 brilliant leader,

01:07:49.360 and all the parts come together.

01:07:51.300 So, here's my three-layer hypothesis.

01:07:55.100 If you can take out the top three layers

01:07:57.740 of good managers from any entity,

01:08:01.600 the entity will collapse.

01:08:03.560 So, you could do it to Apple Computer.

01:08:07.560 So, you take Steve Jobs out of Apple,

01:08:11.560 and, oh, it's good that Tim Cook is very good.

01:08:16.520 He's very good.

01:08:17.240 So, they're not really innovating much,

01:08:20.820 but making a ton of money,

01:08:22.300 doing great,

01:08:23.160 upgrades are looking good.

01:08:25.140 Now, suppose Tim Cook

01:08:26.900 decided to retire early.

01:08:29.760 Well, probably there's a number three

01:08:31.960 that's solid,

01:08:33.580 like a good solid person

01:08:35.920 who's really made a mark in the industry.

01:08:38.740 What if the third one

01:08:40.260 left town unexpectedly,

01:08:42.480 and he got down to the

01:08:44.620 fourth best leader of Apple?

01:08:47.800 Probably would be better

01:08:48.860 than most people at most things.

01:08:51.120 Like, if you're the fourth best Steve Jobs,

01:08:53.920 you're still pretty awesome.

01:08:55.940 But are you good enough

01:08:57.320 to bring that company into the future?

01:09:00.880 Probably not,

01:09:02.240 because it's so rare.

01:09:04.500 You know, the Steve Jobs capability

01:09:06.900 is not normal.

01:09:09.380 Take Elon Musk.

01:09:10.700 If Elon Musk decides to retire tomorrow,

01:09:13.520 would his businesses continue?

01:09:16.520 Probably.

01:09:17.620 Probably.

01:09:18.340 Because he's got really capable leaders

01:09:20.320 in each of his business, obviously.

01:09:22.460 Otherwise, he would have no ability

01:09:23.780 to run them.

01:09:25.100 But what if they retired?

01:09:26.980 Still, third best

01:09:28.760 might be good enough

01:09:30.220 to get you to Mars.

01:09:31.480 What about the fourth best?

01:09:33.640 Well, at that point,

01:09:34.660 it probably all falls apart.

01:09:35.800 So Hezbollah's down

01:09:39.480 to fourth best leader.

01:09:41.540 I don't think he'd come back from that.

01:09:45.560 That may be complete destruction.

01:09:47.840 It just takes a while.

01:09:50.360 So we'll see.

01:09:51.640 But I would also encourage you

01:09:53.620 to remember it's fog of war,

01:09:55.820 and our brainwashers

01:09:57.920 tend to be from one side

01:10:00.080 of the spectrum.

01:10:01.280 So it could be

01:10:02.120 that Israel is not as 0.79

01:10:04.240 incredibly professional

01:10:07.600 and successful

01:10:08.720 as the news is telling you.

01:10:11.480 They might have some flaws.

01:10:13.960 Maybe not everybody's dying

01:10:15.900 as fast as they think.

01:10:17.040 Maybe they're having

01:10:18.660 a little more trouble

01:10:19.400 getting those rocket launchers

01:10:20.780 than maybe the reports

01:10:22.440 will tell you.

01:10:23.020 So I wouldn't believe

01:10:25.000 too much of the news

01:10:26.200 coming out of there

01:10:27.020 unless it's confirmed

01:10:28.420 by the other side,

01:10:29.440 such as the death

01:10:30.280 of their leaders.

01:10:32.480 Anyway,

01:10:33.040 Nicole Wallace

01:10:33.700 on the propaganda

01:10:35.180 brainwashing network

01:10:36.300 MSNBC

01:10:37.480 asked Representative

01:10:39.640 Zoe Lofgren,

01:10:41.980 I guess she's a Democrat,

01:10:45.060 if she would update

01:10:46.780 her passport

01:10:47.420 because if Trump

01:10:48.500 gets into office,

01:10:49.620 he said that

01:10:51.100 the January 6th committee

01:10:52.540 upon which she served

01:10:54.540 should be in jail.

01:10:57.380 And she said

01:10:58.520 quite smugly

01:10:59.400 that Congress

01:11:01.780 is above the law

01:11:02.860 and that Congress

01:11:04.960 is uniquely exempt

01:11:06.320 from the kind of attack

01:11:09.000 that Trump would want

01:11:09.920 to use to put anybody

01:11:11.020 in jail.

01:11:12.220 To which I thought,

01:11:14.120 huh.

01:11:16.080 Because I watched

01:11:17.340 that J6 committee 0.94

01:11:18.520 and to me

01:11:19.240 that all looked criminal.

01:11:20.780 that looked criminal.

01:11:23.460 It looked like

01:11:24.280 an actual insurrection.

01:11:26.240 It looked like treason

01:11:27.140 because they were

01:11:29.240 so obviously

01:11:30.060 hiding information

01:11:32.500 that could have,

01:11:33.460 you know,

01:11:33.640 been useful.

01:11:34.860 I mean,

01:11:35.120 the whole thing

01:11:35.600 was corrupt

01:11:36.240 from the top 0.96

01:11:36.860 to the bottom.

01:11:37.780 So I just assumed

01:11:39.020 there was something

01:11:39.620 illegal going on

01:11:40.660 because how could you

01:11:41.680 have such bad behavior

01:11:42.920 and there's no law

01:11:44.600 that got broken by that?

01:11:45.820 Trying to put somebody,

01:11:47.100 you know,

01:11:47.660 out of office,

01:11:48.380 take power

01:11:49.120 by just lying?

01:11:51.460 How is that legal?

01:11:53.380 But it probably is.

01:11:55.220 So the next time

01:11:56.140 somebody says

01:11:56.740 nobody's above the law,

01:11:58.260 here's your answer.

01:12:00.060 Well, that's not true.

01:12:01.240 Congress is.

01:12:02.840 Congress passed the law.

01:12:06.060 Did it Congress

01:12:07.000 passed the law

01:12:07.540 or is it in the Constitution?

01:12:09.780 Must be Congress, right?

01:12:11.400 Congress must have

01:12:12.100 passed the law

01:12:12.600 to make them

01:12:13.200 above the law.

01:12:14.560 Am I wrong?

01:12:15.380 Congress is the only entity

01:12:17.840 I know

01:12:18.440 that has a fund

01:12:20.240 for paying off

01:12:21.040 sex abuse

01:12:22.020 complainants

01:12:23.160 and they just

01:12:24.340 just sort of

01:12:25.540 chug on like 0.93

01:12:26.240 like his business

01:12:27.680 does normal.

01:12:29.140 Why?

01:12:30.100 Well, I guess

01:12:30.580 they're above the law.

01:12:32.060 Must be above the law.

01:12:33.660 How about Adam Schiff

01:12:34.640 telling you

01:12:35.120 that he went into

01:12:35.900 the SCIF

01:12:37.000 and that he saw

01:12:38.740 the, you know,

01:12:39.300 stuff that would say

01:12:40.080 the Russia collusion

01:12:41.080 thing was true 0.97

01:12:41.840 and then we find out

01:12:43.500 he didn't see

01:12:45.140 anything like that.

01:12:46.000 He just made it up.

01:12:47.400 How is that legal?

01:12:49.400 I mean,

01:12:49.660 these are things

01:12:50.280 which have gigantic

01:12:51.100 consequences

01:12:51.880 in American life.

01:12:53.220 I mean,

01:12:53.520 really things

01:12:54.680 that affect you

01:12:55.280 personally

01:12:55.780 and he could just

01:12:57.480 lie about it

01:12:58.260 but he's in Congress.

01:13:00.560 He's above the law.

01:13:02.400 Now,

01:13:02.640 probably there's no law

01:13:03.560 against lying

01:13:04.160 in that context

01:13:05.800 but

01:13:06.520 nothing else

01:13:08.340 seems to be

01:13:08.820 illegal either.

01:13:09.420 So, yes,

01:13:11.080 we do have a system

01:13:12.220 in which

01:13:12.900 our elected

01:13:13.720 Congress people

01:13:15.080 are literally

01:13:15.920 above the law.

01:13:18.940 All right,

01:13:19.720 Melania has a new book

01:13:21.180 and apparently in it

01:13:22.340 she comes out

01:13:23.060 in favor of abortion.

01:13:24.740 She thinks only women 1.00

01:13:25.720 should make decisions

01:13:26.640 about their bodies.

01:13:28.160 I say the Republicans 1.00

01:13:29.520 are crazy 1.00

01:13:30.380 because they should say 1.00

01:13:32.160 that women 0.97

01:13:33.540 get to make

01:13:34.240 all the decisions now

01:13:35.400 because there are

01:13:35.940 more women voters 0.96

01:13:36.800 than men

01:13:37.240 and now that it's

01:13:38.500 in the states

01:13:39.160 Trump has taken it

01:13:40.680 away from himself

01:13:41.680 a man

01:13:42.160 and taken the decision

01:13:43.860 away from the courts

01:13:44.820 mostly men

01:13:46.260 and given it

01:13:48.040 to the states

01:13:48.680 that are mostly women. 1.00

01:13:50.600 So, to me

01:13:51.360 one of the most

01:13:52.160 compelling arguments

01:13:53.220 is I moved

01:13:54.240 the decision

01:13:54.880 from a domain

01:13:56.380 that was mostly men

01:13:57.440 himself

01:13:58.460 Trump

01:13:59.740 and the Supreme Court

01:14:01.680 mostly men

01:14:02.600 I took it out

01:14:03.820 of the domain

01:14:04.380 where mostly men

01:14:05.260 were deciding

01:14:05.920 and I put it

01:14:06.900 into a domain

01:14:07.680 where women 0.97

01:14:08.560 are the majority.

01:14:10.820 Now,

01:14:11.340 to me

01:14:12.880 that's a solid

01:14:13.600 argument

01:14:14.000 but I have been

01:14:16.600 told by somebody

01:14:17.420 very smart

01:14:18.060 that it doesn't

01:14:19.600 work for everybody.

01:14:22.100 Does it sound

01:14:22.820 good to you?

01:14:23.640 Because I think

01:14:24.320 there's some research

01:14:25.040 that says that's

01:14:25.700 not exactly the one

01:14:26.600 that's going to

01:14:26.980 break through.

01:14:29.780 I think the real

01:14:30.860 keywords

01:14:32.360 are,

01:14:34.680 well,

01:14:34.940 here's how

01:14:35.360 I might want

01:14:36.460 to go about it.

01:14:41.400 Why does he

01:14:42.080 not say that?

01:14:42.980 I don't know.

01:14:43.580 I think it maybe

01:14:44.040 doesn't test well

01:14:45.000 or something.

01:14:45.600 I'm not sure.

01:14:46.980 But

01:14:47.200 here's maybe

01:14:49.900 what Republicans

01:14:51.220 need to be

01:14:51.960 better at.

01:14:53.880 Because of the

01:14:54.660 abortion question

01:14:55.620 it seems like

01:14:57.300 Republicans

01:14:57.820 have

01:14:58.560 accidentally

01:15:00.600 created

01:15:01.280 a brand

01:15:02.780 that can be

01:15:03.740 easily

01:15:04.280 looked at

01:15:05.880 as

01:15:06.100 anti-woman.

01:15:07.560 Now it's not

01:15:08.600 or anything

01:15:09.460 like it

01:15:10.000 but it can be

01:15:10.540 easily

01:15:10.980 reframed that

01:15:12.360 way by the

01:15:12.980 Democrats.

01:15:14.100 So maybe

01:15:14.620 you need to

01:15:15.160 lead

01:15:15.620 with

01:15:17.240 we want

01:15:17.680 what's best

01:15:18.440 for women.

01:15:20.620 Because if you

01:15:21.540 lead with

01:15:22.100 we want

01:15:22.540 what's best

01:15:23.100 for the

01:15:23.540 unborn

01:15:23.980 then all

01:15:25.240 the women 0.97

01:15:25.640 who vote

01:15:26.080 say

01:15:26.400 that's the

01:15:27.340 wrong order.

01:15:28.800 The correct

01:15:29.300 order is

01:15:30.040 I'm first

01:15:31.060 the unborn

01:15:33.060 is second.

01:15:34.620 Now there's

01:15:35.440 probably a way

01:15:36.200 that you can

01:15:37.060 say that

01:15:37.980 without changing

01:15:39.040 your views

01:15:39.560 on abortion.

01:15:41.300 In other words

01:15:41.980 you can say

01:15:42.460 something like

01:15:43.180 our primary

01:15:44.240 concern

01:15:44.760 is the

01:15:46.380 women involved

01:15:47.120 and we know

01:15:47.680 it's a terrible

01:15:48.240 situation to be in

01:15:49.400 and it's a very

01:15:51.240 hard choice

01:15:51.920 and we'd like

01:15:53.040 to do everything

01:15:53.660 we can

01:15:54.260 to support

01:15:55.300 that woman 1.00

01:15:55.840 having the

01:15:56.440 best outcome.

01:15:57.960 I know

01:15:58.660 some people

01:15:59.160 think the best

01:15:59.760 outcome is

01:16:00.440 abortion

01:16:01.940 and women

01:16:03.960 are the

01:16:04.280 majority

01:16:04.660 in the

01:16:05.100 states

01:16:05.400 and they'll

01:16:05.740 make that

01:16:06.160 call.

01:16:07.500 But we

01:16:08.800 think we

01:16:09.380 should be

01:16:09.720 supporting

01:16:10.120 women more 1.00

01:16:10.780 through IVF

01:16:11.960 through better

01:16:14.340 adoption

01:16:15.100 processes

01:16:15.940 in some

01:16:17.480 cases through

01:16:18.120 education

01:16:18.700 and maybe

01:16:19.720 improving our

01:16:21.180 standards for

01:16:21.940 who's getting

01:16:22.500 pregnant and

01:16:23.020 who isn't.

01:16:24.280 And we

01:16:25.800 think that we

01:16:26.380 could work

01:16:26.920 hand in

01:16:28.580 hand with

01:16:29.140 the Democrats

01:16:30.380 because we

01:16:31.700 all like

01:16:32.200 IVF.

01:16:33.760 We all

01:16:34.400 like better

01:16:34.840 adoption.

01:16:37.280 We'd all

01:16:37.720 like that.

01:16:38.600 And we'd

01:16:39.140 like more

01:16:40.380 people.

01:16:41.600 So we'd

01:16:42.260 like these

01:16:42.700 women to 1.00

01:16:43.080 have those

01:16:43.460 children.

01:16:44.180 And we

01:16:44.620 also think

01:16:45.180 that the

01:16:45.580 people who

01:16:45.980 are happiest

01:16:46.540 are in a

01:16:47.800 stable family

01:16:49.200 relationship.

01:16:50.020 So there

01:16:50.280 might be a

01:16:50.660 lot of

01:16:50.880 situations where

01:16:51.680 they would

01:16:52.040 have been

01:16:52.280 happier having

01:16:52.960 the child.

01:16:54.620 But we

01:16:55.240 want to make

01:16:55.620 sure they have

01:16:56.100 all those

01:16:56.580 options.

01:16:56.980 So there's

01:16:58.480 some way

01:16:58.820 to sell

01:16:59.180 this where

01:16:59.820 you've put

01:17:00.260 the woman 0.98

01:17:00.700 first, but

01:17:02.060 you haven't

01:17:02.520 changed your

01:17:03.040 mind about

01:17:03.500 whether or

01:17:03.900 not there

01:17:04.180 should be

01:17:04.480 an abortion.

01:17:06.040 A lot of

01:17:06.820 it is just

01:17:07.240 the way you

01:17:07.620 frame it.

01:17:09.580 So it

01:17:10.960 might seem

01:17:11.660 creepy to

01:17:14.000 Republicans to

01:17:15.900 basically take

01:17:17.640 the chance of

01:17:18.320 throwing away

01:17:19.020 a baby, as

01:17:19.960 you would

01:17:20.240 say, to

01:17:21.840 support some

01:17:22.640 green-haired

01:17:23.300 feminist.

01:17:23.980 But I

01:17:27.080 think it's

01:17:28.980 not immoral

01:17:30.780 or unethical

01:17:31.900 to say that

01:17:33.180 you care about

01:17:33.960 the adult

01:17:34.900 woman.

01:17:36.520 You can

01:17:37.480 make that the

01:17:38.100 first part of

01:17:38.700 your message

01:17:39.220 and still not

01:17:41.400 change your

01:17:41.820 opinion on

01:17:42.280 abortion.

01:17:43.500 So it would

01:17:44.420 be a little

01:17:44.740 better framing.

01:17:45.600 I don't know

01:17:45.880 if it would

01:17:46.100 change anybody's

01:17:46.720 opinion, but

01:17:48.020 there's a

01:17:48.320 better way to

01:17:48.760 say everything.

01:17:50.460 All right.

01:17:52.660 Apparently,

01:17:53.140 Scott Pressler

01:17:53.960 got another

01:17:54.560 win.

01:17:55.120 He's been

01:17:55.540 registering

01:17:56.020 people in

01:17:56.680 Pennsylvania,

01:17:57.040 and he

01:17:57.620 alerted us

01:17:58.200 to the

01:17:58.480 fact that

01:17:59.540 although Trump

01:18:00.180 is going to

01:18:00.480 have his

01:18:00.800 rally there in

01:18:01.680 Pennsylvania,

01:18:02.420 in Butler,

01:18:03.060 the same place

01:18:03.660 he got his

01:18:04.180 shot, and

01:18:06.000 of course it'll

01:18:06.520 be a big

01:18:06.900 event because

01:18:07.460 it's being

01:18:07.840 held there.

01:18:09.680 And I

01:18:11.400 guess Scott

01:18:11.860 Pressler was

01:18:12.480 hoping there

01:18:12.880 would be a

01:18:13.160 lot of voter

01:18:13.640 registrations

01:18:14.480 because there

01:18:15.340 would be a

01:18:15.540 lot of

01:18:15.760 attention on

01:18:16.380 that, and

01:18:16.900 he'd be able

01:18:17.360 to use that

01:18:17.800 to boost his

01:18:18.420 voter registration

01:18:19.200 stuff.

01:18:20.120 But then the

01:18:20.820 people who

01:18:22.660 run the

01:18:23.080 systems in

01:18:23.860 the state

01:18:24.340 decided to

01:18:25.160 do maintenance

01:18:25.720 on the

01:18:26.260 voter registration

01:18:27.040 system the

01:18:28.420 evening of

01:18:29.060 the rally,

01:18:31.060 which looks,

01:18:33.860 first of all,

01:18:35.220 there are some

01:18:35.780 reports that that

01:18:36.520 would be uncommon,

01:18:37.960 that normally

01:18:38.520 they would do

01:18:39.060 it from,

01:18:39.560 let's say,

01:18:40.140 midnight or

01:18:41.260 3 a.m.

01:18:42.200 They wouldn't

01:18:42.880 do it at 6

01:18:43.500 p.m. to

01:18:43.960 midnight, the

01:18:44.600 exact time that

01:18:45.440 people would be

01:18:46.040 likely registering

01:18:47.100 because they got

01:18:47.820 inspired by the

01:18:48.800 rally, and

01:18:51.040 that got

01:18:51.520 reversed.

01:18:53.160 So Scott

01:18:53.740 Pressler took

01:18:55.620 it to the

01:18:55.980 public and

01:18:56.840 embarrassed the

01:18:57.740 people who

01:18:58.480 were in

01:18:58.740 charge, and

01:18:59.240 the people in

01:18:59.720 charge said,

01:19:00.240 ah, we'll do

01:19:00.960 maintenance at

01:19:01.500 night like we

01:19:02.160 always do.

01:19:03.300 Good job,

01:19:04.760 Scott Pressler.

01:19:05.660 I'll tell you,

01:19:06.420 if Trump wins

01:19:07.720 and Pennsylvania

01:19:08.760 is the state

01:19:10.400 that makes all

01:19:10.940 the difference,

01:19:12.820 Scott Pressler

01:19:13.700 needs some

01:19:14.400 kind of national

01:19:16.340 recognition.

01:19:17.020 I don't know

01:19:18.480 what it would

01:19:18.740 be.

01:19:20.380 What's available,

01:19:21.380 like a, I

01:19:22.740 don't know, some

01:19:23.440 kind of medal of

01:19:24.420 something?

01:19:26.020 There's got to be

01:19:26.740 some kind of an

01:19:27.300 award for that.

01:19:31.200 He's really

01:19:31.820 representing the

01:19:32.600 best of the

01:19:33.760 American spirit,

01:19:35.620 in so many

01:19:36.160 ways, in so

01:19:37.320 many ways.

01:19:38.560 You know, he's

01:19:38.960 got the hard

01:19:39.540 work, he's got

01:19:40.560 the supporting the

01:19:41.760 system, he's got

01:19:43.280 the trying to do

01:19:44.200 it right, you

01:19:45.320 know, lots of

01:19:45.820 people are trying

01:19:46.400 to do their

01:19:46.860 weasel thing, a

01:19:48.260 lot of people

01:19:48.600 lying in politics

01:19:49.800 and hiding

01:19:50.880 things.

01:19:51.640 He's just

01:19:52.240 trying to do

01:19:52.820 it right.

01:19:53.780 Just, how

01:19:54.520 about we sign

01:19:55.660 you up to

01:19:56.080 vote?

01:19:56.960 That's doing

01:19:57.560 it right.

01:19:59.600 So, congratulations

01:20:00.760 to him, I hope

01:20:01.420 it works out.

01:20:02.900 All right, Medal

01:20:03.300 of Freedom, there

01:20:04.100 you go, the

01:20:05.140 Medal of Freedom.

01:20:06.420 Why not?

01:20:07.940 Medal of Freedom.

01:20:10.040 I mean, he

01:20:10.480 certainly would

01:20:11.040 have saved the

01:20:11.600 country.

01:20:12.920 I mean, maybe.

01:20:14.700 It could be he's

01:20:15.620 saving the

01:20:16.060 country.

01:20:16.580 I mean, it

01:20:16.940 could be that

01:20:17.540 close.

01:20:18.120 His work makes

01:20:19.180 a difference.

01:20:21.600 All right.

01:20:25.400 A bedazzled

01:20:26.440 Medal of Honor.

01:20:27.300 Yeah, let's

01:20:27.680 make it special.

01:20:31.140 All right, ladies 1.00

01:20:31.880 and gentlemen, I'm

01:20:32.740 going to say

01:20:33.940 hi to the

01:20:34.760 subscribers on

01:20:36.120 Locals.

01:20:36.620 That's all I have

01:20:37.200 for the rest of

01:20:37.760 you.

01:20:38.320 If you're on

01:20:38.840 Axor, Rumble,

01:20:39.740 or YouTube,

01:20:41.440 thanks for joining,

01:20:42.600 and I will see you

01:20:43.540 same time tomorrow

01:20:45.060 and locals,

01:20:49.240 I will be with

01:20:50.180 you in 30

01:20:50.840 seconds privately.

01:20:51.740 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 04, 2024

Episode 2618 CWSA 10⧸04⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript