Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2626 CWSA 10⧸12⧸24

00:00:00.000 There we go.

00:00:08.080 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:18.680 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm pretty confident that you've never had a better time.

00:00:23.980 But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand

00:00:30.240 with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:00:35.300 a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:39.180 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:41.100 I like coffee.

00:00:42.600 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,

00:00:46.560 the thing that makes everything better today with extra oxytocin.

00:00:50.820 And it happens now.

00:00:53.980 Oh, so good.

00:01:01.820 Delightful.

00:01:04.240 Well, here are a few things that I've heard on social media in the last few days.

00:01:11.020 The United States has some big facility at the South Pole where we're controlling earthquakes

00:01:19.140 and the weather.

00:01:20.620 Well, I'm not going to say that I'm buying into that one yet.

00:01:28.760 Stop it, Kamala. 0.98

00:01:33.720 I don't know how that happens, but the video just started running on its own.

00:01:40.080 Go away.

00:01:41.740 There we go.

00:01:42.460 So I don't believe the South Pole has a major earthquake-making weather-changing facility,

00:01:50.780 but maybe.

00:01:52.920 Maybe that's where they're keeping all the UFOs.

00:01:55.820 I've heard there's something called zero-point energy that we got from the UFOs or the UAPs.

00:02:02.080 So we have infinite energy, and the question is, do you steal it or give it away?

00:02:09.320 And I thought, that's kind of an interesting question, isn't it?

00:02:11.940 Suppose the United States or any one country captured a downed UFO and reverse-engineered its energy-making properties,

00:02:24.240 and then suppose that one country on Earth had the capability of having free unlimited energy.

00:02:32.260 What do you do with it?

00:02:35.560 Well, here's the weird thing.

00:02:37.860 If you think about, well, we'll give it to the world, and then the world will have free energy.

00:02:43.620 I'm not sure we would do that.

00:02:46.340 I'm not even sure we would ever make it available.

00:02:50.000 So I love the fact that, well, I don't think that we've discovered any infinite energy from UFOs.

00:02:56.720 I'm not on that page.

00:02:59.340 It is true that if we did, we wouldn't necessarily ever release it.

00:03:03.720 Because what it would do is it would equalize the power of all the countries in the world.

00:03:08.880 Because suddenly the smallest country in the world would have unlimited energy.

00:03:13.960 If you had unlimited energy, you could end up building, I don't know, particle beam weapons and lasers,

00:03:20.200 and you wouldn't be able to dominate the world as America likes to do. 0.96

00:03:25.040 So sure enough, if we had infinite energy and it was free energy, I don't know if we would tell anybody.

00:03:31.520 We might just keep it to ourselves.

00:03:36.740 There are other accounts that the aliens have now been well-discovered,

00:03:41.720 and a whistleblower can guarantee that there's a big government facility looking at all the alien ships,

00:03:48.020 and let's call them UAPs because we don't know if they're from outer space,

00:03:52.000 and that there might be some announcement soon.

00:03:56.000 I do not believe any of that.

00:03:58.380 I do not believe there will be an announcement of any official sightings of UAPs.

00:04:04.180 I do not believe that there are orbs.

00:04:09.960 So the reporting is that the UFOs are orbs, you know,

00:04:13.400 they're like just round glowing things that seem to defy physics.

00:04:19.940 I don't think so.

00:04:21.500 But I could be convinced.

00:04:24.380 So all these things that I've been hearing on social media,

00:04:28.800 I don't believe a single one of them,

00:04:31.540 but I could be convinced.

00:04:34.580 You know, I could imagine some future situation in which there's better information,

00:04:38.820 and suddenly I think, hey, those alien orbs are all over the place.

00:04:44.000 But not yet.

00:04:44.840 So I remember I told you how impressed I was that Elon Musk sent his Tesla robots,

00:04:52.000 the Optimus, to mingle with the crowd at his launch event,

00:04:56.800 and that the robots would just have conversations and mingle and act like people.

00:05:03.040 And then today I saw a video that suggests,

00:05:06.260 and we do know that at least the bartender robots had some human assist.

00:05:12.360 So there were some humans operating them remotely

00:05:15.700 so that they could do maybe a little more than a robot could do.

00:05:20.160 But I think the reality is that maybe all the robots might have had a little remote assist.

00:05:26.800 So I don't think that that event showed you what the robots can do.

00:05:31.620 I think it's showing you what they think they can get the robots to do eventually.

00:05:36.500 I don't know that for sure.

00:05:37.740 But I would be a little cautious that the robots are as advanced as the initial press suggested.

00:05:46.780 In my experience using AI as just a consumer,

00:05:50.640 it did not seem to me that the AI itself would be anywhere near good enough for a robot

00:05:56.380 to act the way the robots were supposed to be acting.

00:05:59.680 So it wouldn't surprise me if there was a little more human remote assistance in those robots

00:06:06.280 than was immediately apparent.

00:06:09.460 So I saw one video of a robot having a conversation at the event,

00:06:13.060 and it was clearly just a person.

00:06:15.940 There was no doubt about the voice coming out of the robot in that clip was a person, not an AI.

00:06:22.980 But the clip itself could have been fake, so I don't know what's going on.

00:06:27.120 So I don't know if the clip was fake or the robots were human-assisted,

00:06:32.760 but I wouldn't believe that they can do all the things that you thought they could believe they could do.

00:06:38.480 Not yet.

00:06:39.020 I think they will.

00:06:41.720 Speaking of Elon Musk, Starship 5 is going to take off in two days.

00:06:47.560 So that's that really big, fat rocket that I don't think has successfully launched yet.

00:06:55.380 But if it does, it's a big, big deal.

00:06:57.820 It's a Starship.

00:06:59.400 And what's fun about it is that when this one lands, if everything worked,

00:07:04.520 there are these two gigantic chopsticks that will hold it when it lands.

00:07:10.860 So it's going to come down like a regular rocket, but apparently it won't be completely stable when it lands.

00:07:18.140 So these giant chopsticks are just going to grab it when it reaches the ground.

00:07:22.920 Do you think that's going to work?

00:07:25.320 I'll tell you, if you told me that rockets were going to, you know,

00:07:28.820 take off and then land so they could be reused,

00:07:33.620 I might have said, I don't know if he could ever do that.

00:07:35.920 And then I hear that you're going to grab the rocket with giant chopsticks.

00:07:40.620 And then I say again, I'm not sure you could do that.

00:07:44.740 I don't know if that can be done.

00:07:46.440 We'll find out in two days.

00:07:47.880 We might find out if it can be done.

00:07:49.620 I wouldn't bet against Musk when it comes to giant mechanical things.

00:07:56.660 Well, Babylon Bee has a parody movie called January 6th, The Most Deadliest Day.

00:08:03.680 The Most Deadliest Day.

00:08:05.160 Because Democrats say January 6th was the most deadliest day,

00:08:09.600 which is, you know, laughably incorrect.

00:08:12.540 So I only saw the trailer for it, but it looks like it's very funny. 0.70

00:08:19.600 CBS News was acting ridiculous.

00:08:22.240 They had a headline today that Trump wants to make auto loan interest tax, 0.72

00:08:27.240 interest on auto loans tax deductible.

00:08:30.980 Now that part's true.

00:08:32.120 Trump did say, I'll make the interest on auto loans tax deductible.

00:08:40.500 And then CBS News says it would mostly help the rich, experts say.

00:08:45.660 It would mostly help the rich to make a write-off on your car loan.

00:08:53.580 Well, this is awkward.

00:08:58.580 But as an official representative of people who are often called rich,

00:09:03.780 we don't get car loans.

00:09:08.200 Did anybody know that?

00:09:12.520 It comes with being rich.

00:09:17.160 They just sort of pay cash for the car.

00:09:20.120 I mean, I don't know what kind of car you would be rich and still need a loan for.

00:09:24.780 That's sort of like not being rich.

00:09:27.180 Now, to be fair, the car I'm driving, I did have a loan on.

00:09:30.940 Yeah, the BMW SUV that I have, it just happened to be some weird period in my life

00:09:38.940 where I had this, you know, a lot of cash output at the same time,

00:09:43.000 but I wanted a car and I didn't want to wait a week

00:09:45.080 and I didn't want to sell any stock because I liked the stock that I had.

00:09:48.100 So I did get a loan, believe it or not.

00:09:51.400 Now, because I'm rich, as soon as my cash replenished, I paid it off.

00:09:57.220 So, you know, I didn't pay it until completion.

00:10:00.160 It was just sort of a short-term cash flow management thing.

00:10:03.920 Very normal.

00:10:04.860 It had nothing to do with being rich or poor or anything else.

00:10:07.440 It was just a weird coincidence of events that I needed cash at the same time

00:10:12.640 for a bunch of things.

00:10:14.560 But generally speaking, it would be true that rich people pay cash for cars. 0.98

00:10:19.800 So CBS, you're being silly. 0.92

00:10:24.760 There's a report in the New England Journal of Medicine, 0.94

00:10:27.960 John Fleetwood's writing, that Big Pharma apparently paid over a billion dollars

00:10:33.940 to influence medical research between 2020 and 2022,

00:10:39.140 which would be the period of the pandemic.

00:10:42.920 But they tried to influence the medical research in BMJ, JAMA, and the Lancet.

00:10:48.940 Those are the big ones.

00:10:49.800 It said 59% of journal reviewers, so these would be the people reviewing the studies

00:10:57.120 to say that they're passing peer review or not,

00:11:01.240 that 59% of them received Pharma payments, revealing massive conflicts of interest.

00:11:09.700 So you trust that science, knowing that 59% of the people reviewing the science

00:11:21.780 are being paid by people who would kind of like that science to go their way.

00:11:26.840 So you should not be surprised that science is in the state of total lack of credibility when there's a good reason for that.

00:11:38.800 Apparently, science is pretty much bribed and ruined like everything else.

00:11:42.860 So you've heard that there's a big argument about voter ID.

00:11:58.260 Democrats say, we don't need no voter ID.

00:12:01.240 It's just causing people to not be able to vote.

00:12:04.000 And Republicans are saying, if you don't have voter ID, then all the people who are not allowed to vote are going to vote,

00:12:10.820 and the election will be different.

00:12:13.000 Well, there is one study from 2019 that allegedly found that strict ID requirements have no effect on fraud.

00:12:21.740 That if you have strict ID requirements, you get basically the same result as if you don't have any requirements at all on fraud.

00:12:33.960 Does that sound even slightly true to you?

00:12:39.580 I don't know.

00:12:40.640 That looks like the sort of study that may have gone through the 59% of journal reviewers

00:12:46.980 who were tainted by the pharma industry payments.

00:12:51.880 In this case, it has nothing to do with pharma, but kind of wonder who reviewed this study, don't you?

00:12:59.380 Who reviewed that study?

00:13:01.400 I'm going to say that it might not matter if you have strict ID requirements

00:13:06.860 if the environment is that people are not talking about ID requirements.

00:13:12.580 If nobody is talking about ID requirements, I completely understand why it wouldn't be much of an issue.

00:13:20.260 Because people who didn't have ID would think that they needed it, so they'd stay home.

00:13:25.200 And that would be the end of the story.

00:13:27.800 Everybody would just assume they needed ID if they were going to vote.

00:13:31.700 So if they didn't have it, they'd just stay home and they'd never bring it up.

00:13:36.060 And nobody would even think there was any difference.

00:13:38.480 But what if there's a gigantic national conversation about voter ID

00:13:45.180 combined with a massive influx of people who don't have ID

00:13:49.720 because they're coming from other countries? 0.97

00:13:51.960 Do you think you can use your 2019 study that's probably bullshit in the first place 1.00

00:13:56.760 to find out what will happen in a completely different fucking situation? 1.00

00:14:03.760 Science. 0.99

00:14:04.780 I'm glad we've got this science to tell us what's true.

00:14:07.380 So I'm not going to believe that one.

00:14:11.540 The propaganda network, sometimes called MSNBC.

00:14:14.920 I can't call it a news network anymore.

00:14:17.160 It's just so ridiculously over-the-top propaganda at this point

00:14:20.920 that to imagine it's like a news platform, it's just so far from news.

00:14:28.080 It's not even close.

00:14:29.220 But Chris Hayes is telling us that Trump is signaling he's not going to accept a defeat in 2020.

00:14:38.760 Here's how I interpret that.

00:14:40.340 If the propaganda network tells you Trump is signaling he won't accept the election results,

00:14:45.440 what I hear, what I hear is a secret dog whistle from MSNBC telling us that they're going to definitely rig the election

00:14:55.460 and they want to prime you in advance that anybody who would question this upcoming election 0.99

00:15:00.320 is some kind of a crazy, fascist, Nazi, possibly. 0.99

00:15:06.040 The, yeah, I'm hearing the dog whistle. 1.00

00:15:12.320 The dog whistle says we're totally going to cheat, so we want to make sure in advance

00:15:17.040 that if anybody is going to question the election, that we'll discredit them before they even try.

00:15:23.080 I mean, people, who is going to question an election in the United States except bad people?

00:15:29.480 Only bad people are going to question an election, unless it's the Democrats,

00:15:34.080 in which case they've got a really good argument.

00:15:36.940 But when the Republicans do it, bad people, just bad people.

00:15:44.420 Yeah, anyway, that's not a good look. 0.81

00:15:48.460 Barack Obama is still getting some backlash for telling black men

00:15:53.740 that maybe they're just a little too worried about having a woman president

00:15:57.680 and therefore are not supporting Kamala Harris as much as maybe they should.

00:16:05.040 And I'm not too interested in it.

00:16:09.300 I'm sort of interested that there's a backlash from both the left and the right to it.

00:16:15.280 The right just sort of makes fun of it.

00:16:17.640 But the left, I've seen a number of people saying,

00:16:20.880 why is Barack Obama insulting my people? 0.63

00:16:24.600 Why is he insulting black men? 0.62

00:16:32.160 Have you noticed that when people don't do what Democrats want,

00:16:37.100 they don't tell that it's not so much the reasons why they should do something different. 1.00

00:16:41.500 It's like, you suck. 0.99

00:16:43.500 Everybody's a racist or a fascist if they don't do exactly what a Democrat wants them to do. 1.00

00:16:47.920 How about sometimes you'd make an argument? 0.99

00:16:51.680 No, you're just a bunch of sexists, according to Barack Obama.

00:16:58.160 So, but here's something I wondered. 0.87

00:17:02.960 If it's sexist, and it could be, by the way.

00:17:07.160 I have heard some black men on social media say that they wouldn't vote for a woman as a leader.

00:17:13.280 However, the people who say that, that I saw on social media,

00:17:18.920 gives that strong indication that they weren't going to vote anyway.

00:17:23.860 They didn't exactly look like regular voters, the one who said they wouldn't vote for a woman.

00:17:30.100 But I wondered, would they have voted for Hillary Clinton?

00:17:34.040 Because we would know that, right?

00:17:35.740 Because she ran. 0.95

00:17:36.480 Well, Clinton got 88% of the black vote in 2016.

00:17:42.620 How do you get 88% of the black vote unless black men are massively voting for you? 1.00

00:17:49.020 Am I wrong?

00:17:51.260 I mean, let's say you even got, I don't know, 98% of the women voting for you, the black women.

00:18:00.080 You'd still have a whole bunch of black men voting to get up to 88% of black voters are for Hillary. 1.00

00:18:08.720 So, I don't know how much it showed up when Clinton was running, because as I've often said,

00:18:15.400 you can come up with, you know, plenty of criticisms for Hillary Clinton,

00:18:19.800 but among the criticisms would not be included the following. 1.00

00:18:24.380 She's stupid. 1.00

00:18:25.840 Nope. 1.00

00:18:26.880 Nope.

00:18:27.580 Say what you will about Hillary Clinton, and I say plenty. 0.99

00:18:30.640 She's not stupid. 0.93

00:18:32.280 She's very, very smart. 0.99

00:18:36.060 So, if you're a black man, and you see that she's been a senator,

00:18:40.580 she's been the State Department person, she's been in the White House, 0.51

00:18:44.860 do you think that black men would look at Hillary Clinton and say,

00:18:48.720 oh, there's someone who could never be a commander-in-chief? 0.99

00:18:53.260 I deeply hate Hillary Clinton, but she absolutely could have been a commander-in-chief. 1.00

00:19:00.740 And I'm not going to say that about everybody, because I don't think it's true for Kamala Harris.

00:19:05.340 But I think it depends who the woman is. 0.99

00:19:08.560 I think that this whole idea that misogyny is involved, but just with Kamala Harris,

00:19:16.440 I think that has more to do with her.

00:19:19.340 Although I wouldn't be surprised if the way people interpret it in their own minds is,

00:19:24.280 I'm not sure I'm comfortable with a woman as a leader. 1.00

00:19:27.620 I think they were pretty comfortable when Hillary Clinton was running.

00:19:31.820 Even I would be.

00:19:32.700 I mean, even I would be comfortable with her in charge, you know, if I trusted at least her mission.

00:19:40.340 She has at least the capability, full capability.

00:19:44.540 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners,

00:19:48.680 I started wondering, is every fabulous item I see from Winners?

00:19:53.240 Like that woman over there with the designer jeans. 1.00

00:19:56.160 Are those from Winners?

00:19:57.720 Ooh, are those beautiful gold earrings.

00:20:00.180 Did she pay full price?

00:20:01.240 Or that leather tote?

00:20:02.520 Or that cashmere sweater?

00:20:03.700 Or those knee-high boots?

00:20:05.200 That dress?

00:20:05.980 That jacket?

00:20:06.660 Those shoes?

00:20:07.680 Is anyone paying full price for anything?

00:20:10.620 Stop wondering.

00:20:11.900 Start winning.

00:20:12.840 Winners.

00:20:13.420 Find fabulous for less.

00:20:16.080 All right, but here's the thing that sticks out for me.

00:20:19.280 I haven't heard anybody talk about it.

00:20:20.780 How did it suddenly become socially acceptable and socially safe for both black men and black women to say in public and on video and on social media that they have a complete support for Trump?

00:20:37.080 This is new.

00:20:39.140 This is new, right?

00:20:41.360 Now, I'm not saying that there were not any black supporters of Trump before, because of course there were.

00:20:48.100 But I don't feel like they felt safe saying it out loud in public, like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm totally, I'm Trump all day long.

00:20:57.060 And I've seen video after video of young people, older people, a whole bunch of different ages, but black voters, usually on the street, sometimes in small groups, and they're just saying, oh, yeah, Trump, Trump, Trump all day. 0.52

00:21:12.800 Now, they're not all saying Trump.

00:21:14.880 There are others who are voting for Harris, et cetera.

00:21:16.600 But this is completely different.

00:21:20.480 And here's my speculation.

00:21:23.120 I don't believe that you would see so many people, so many black American voters supporting Trump vocally and in public and with no sense of embarrassment about it, no sense of, oh, I hate to tell you this, but just saying it.

00:21:40.220 It's not like I have to hedge it.

00:21:42.080 I have to say, well, he's bad in these ways, but all over, you know, if you weigh everything, I think I slightly support him.

00:21:51.080 You know, that's what white people say.

00:21:53.020 That's how white people talk.

00:21:54.960 You know, all this nuance.

00:21:57.060 Well, you know, I don't like everything about him, but he's better than the alternative.

00:22:02.440 And you see the black American voters are just, oh, yeah, Trump all day long. 0.77

00:22:06.000 It's not even close.

00:22:07.900 So here's what I think.

00:22:09.140 I think you couldn't possibly see so many black American voters be completely comfortable to give a non-nuanced, full-throated, yes, Trump in public unless, unless the private conversations look the same. 0.73

00:22:31.000 And maybe more, because I don't know what percentage of black Americans privately saying Trump might be the answer is sufficient for anybody to say, oh, I could just say that in public now. 0.92

00:22:46.320 And I couldn't say it in public before, but I can do it now.

00:22:49.840 Something big has changed, and I think it's not just the public statements.

00:22:56.220 I think that, you know, I think that at home, the conversation is completely different.

00:23:01.740 Glenn Youngkin points out, it's only, you know, 30 days till the election.

00:23:10.960 And I guess the Biden-Harris Department of Justice, they're filing a lawsuit against Virginia, the Commonwealth, for enforcing a law to remove non-citizens from the voting rolls.

00:23:23.700 So Virginia followed its own law, it's a law that says they have to do it, and they cleaned up their voting rolls so that it's only people who should be allowed to vote are on the list of people who should be allowed to vote.

00:23:38.900 Now, what would be the problem of improving your list of voters so that it doesn't include people who shouldn't vote?

00:23:51.100 Well, according to the Biden-Harris Department of Justice, they're getting sued for doing that.

00:23:59.600 And here's the question I would ask.

00:24:01.620 Since the argument against it has something to do with disenfranchising voters, can you show me that person?

00:24:11.000 Can you just find one?

00:24:14.320 One would be fine.

00:24:15.960 You know, normally I would ask for a scientific poll to make sure that there's really a problem here that needs to be addressed.

00:24:24.260 The problem being that if you get rid of all the voters who are dead and not in the state and should not be voting, that it would somehow suppress the votes of people who are completely allowed to vote.

00:24:37.880 So somehow preventing people who are not allowed to vote from voting would have some kind of an impact on people who are allowed to vote.

00:24:49.460 So can we get an interview with that person who would not vote because Virginia cleaned up his voting rolls?

00:25:00.760 Just one.

00:25:01.840 Again, I don't need a gold standard controlled trial.

00:25:07.360 Well, just show me, just show me that one, just one voter who said I was totally going to vote until Virginia cleaned up his voting rolls.

00:25:19.340 And now I don't know what to do.

00:25:21.480 Can I vote?

00:25:23.120 I mean, I'm totally a legal voter and I've always been a legal voter and I live in the state and I'm an American citizen and I've got ID.

00:25:31.920 But now that Virginia got rid of the people who are not legal voters, I don't know if I can vote anymore. 1.00

00:25:40.400 Let's have a talk with that guy because that guy sounds kind of fun. 0.96

00:25:45.140 I think I'd like to see that crazy old bastard explain exactly why he can't vote this time because the people who have nothing to do with him can't vote. 0.97

00:25:55.100 Just one. 0.99

00:25:56.800 Just one.

00:25:58.260 Just one interview.

00:26:00.160 And I'll be on your side.

00:26:01.400 Democrats, you can win me over with just one. 0.82

00:26:05.800 One data point.

00:26:07.320 That's all I'm asking for.

00:26:08.700 Just one. 1.00

00:26:12.280 Anyway, we're going to play a game that I call drunk or stupid. 1.00

00:26:19.780 I'm going to play a video of Kamala Harris at a recent event and I'd like you to judge drunk or stupid. 1.00

00:26:28.000 One moment, please. 1.00

00:26:29.320 One moment, please.

00:26:40.280 Oh, it's not working.

00:26:45.000 Let me see if I can make it work.

00:26:46.440 Can you hear that?

00:26:56.640 My technology is failing me. 1.00

00:27:09.200 Drunk or stupid? 1.00

00:27:09.940 No. 1.00

00:27:16.440 all right well you'd have to see it and I did test this I'm in the rumble studio

00:27:39.960 oh you got no sound not on locals hmm darn it all right sorry about that but the the the technology

00:27:52.320 does do this and I did test it before we went live but it just stopped working in the middle

00:27:58.220 so that's not cool that's not cool anyway so if you'd seen it boy would we be having a good time

00:28:09.260 now we're not now I'm just all pissed off but if I were not pissed off and you had seen that 0.98

00:28:17.480 my goodness we'd be having a good time now instead of this whiny fucked up attitude that I have 0.98

00:28:25.000 because this fucking thing didn't work when I wanted it to but boy would we be having fun if it 0.99

00:28:30.960 did no she's at um I'll just give you my opinion in my opinion she's obviously drunk 1.00

00:28:37.580 and it's just funny that we're pretending like we don't see it

00:28:42.400 uh you can see you can see it on my uh x feed if you want to see it 0.97

00:28:48.700 anyway while she was acting stupid and drunk in public uh Tim Walsh was talking to Michael Strayon

00:28:56.460 and if you want to see a car wreck of an interview you should see that now it turns out that every 0.99

00:29:04.920 single day now now that both Walsh and Harris are doing more public stuff it really is just the news

00:29:12.320 about them completely blowing so to speak some public event and I've never seen an easier campaign

00:29:24.300 where the other side just has to show the actual event with no commentary and just have

00:29:30.880 Donald Trump I approve this message he's actually doing that now and it's freaking amazing he literally

00:29:38.360 just ran a campaign where it was nothing but her exact words he added no commentary whatsoever

00:29:43.980 and then at the end he just said I approve this message that's baller if you could just show them

00:29:51.500 in their own words and not add a single thing and just say here's my campaign ad look what look at this

00:29:57.980 that's great yeah so the Tim Walsh thing was a total train wreck as well

00:30:02.680 one of the questions was I guess he had at one point

00:30:06.660 said he wanted to get rid of the electoral college but the campaign

00:30:10.540 is not on that so Strayon asked him

00:30:13.800 well you said you wanted to get rid of the electoral college

00:30:17.720 but what do you say now because Conley Harris does not want to

00:30:21.680 and he did the well you know why I said a thing but the campaign is very clear

00:30:26.340 very clear uh we're not going to do that

00:30:29.240 okay

00:30:31.280 bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package

00:30:38.540 learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages conditions apply

00:30:43.720 Scotiabank you're richer than you think

00:30:46.600 all right so J.D. Vance was being grilled by a New York Times reporter

00:30:53.000 and the New York Times reporter was trying desperately to get him on video

00:30:58.200 to say that he wouldn't accept uh the results of the next election

00:31:03.280 because that would make sure that you knew that maybe they hadn't didn't accept the last one and 0.97

00:31:08.660 and maybe that's just who they are and maybe that's just proof that Trump is a fascist 0.99

00:31:13.000 so

00:31:14.800 she tries with the question asking Vance uh you know did Trump lose the 2020 election

00:31:21.660 and Vance went into a story about how uh the uh FBI convinced the technology platforms to lie

00:31:32.260 about the Hunter laptop and that there is science that supports the fact that it changed the outcome

00:31:38.300 of the vote in a pretty measurable way and then of course she didn't like that

00:31:44.600 because that was something that's sort of outside of the vote counting world

00:31:48.580 so she wanted to limit it to the you know is the vote rigged or not 0.56

00:31:52.560 and then once again J.D. used her question

00:31:56.760 as an excuse to talk about not what she wanted to talk about

00:32:00.720 which is vote counting rigging but talking about rigging in a larger sense

00:32:05.420 because the social media platforms and our information

00:32:08.620 network were clearly rigged in a way intended to change the election

00:32:13.340 and it was done by people within the government

00:32:16.120 and then she didn't like that

00:32:19.200 so she tried to ask him a third time

00:32:21.260 and then J.D. for a third time

00:32:23.980 used the time

00:32:25.240 to describe how

00:32:27.220 the election had been totally rigged

00:32:30.100 outside of the vote counting part

00:32:31.800 totally rigged by the information

00:32:33.780 you know bad behavior

00:32:35.860 by our government

00:32:37.180 then she tried for the

00:32:39.220 fourth time

00:32:40.540 to get him to say something about

00:32:42.960 the upcoming elections

00:32:44.280 and

00:32:46.520 he asked if

00:32:48.080 he'd commit to a peaceful transfer of power

00:32:50.980 now J.D. Vance being one of the more gifted

00:32:54.080 communicators

00:32:56.100 did the following

00:32:57.840 which I

00:32:58.580 if you want to see perfect form

00:33:01.340 this is it

00:33:02.880 so the question is

00:33:04.300 would he commit to a peaceful transfer of power

00:33:06.700 what's the first thing you say

00:33:08.900 when asked

00:33:10.240 would you commit to a peaceful transfer of power

00:33:13.480 what's the first thing to say

00:33:15.560 every time

00:33:16.300 yes

00:33:18.520 okay

00:33:19.560 if you don't say yes to that question

00:33:21.520 and you start explaining

00:33:23.560 or giving some background

00:33:24.900 or

00:33:25.380 well you need to know the context 1.00

00:33:27.540 oh you fucked up 0.99

00:33:29.160 that 1.00

00:33:31.300 the question is

00:33:33.160 you know

00:33:33.840 will you accept

00:33:34.800 a

00:33:35.300 you know

00:33:35.740 will you do a

00:33:36.620 peaceful transfer

00:33:37.800 you say yes to that

00:33:39.860 you

00:33:40.820 you give that a hard yes

00:33:42.380 and then you talk about it

00:33:44.540 you don't talk about it first

00:33:46.700 and then get to

00:33:47.760 something like a yes

00:33:49.260 no no no

00:33:50.900 you say yes

00:33:51.740 hard yes

00:33:52.440 unambiguous

00:33:53.580 yes

00:33:54.300 and then you talk about

00:33:55.960 stuff

00:33:56.600 for example

00:33:58.560 he said

00:34:02.760 of course it will be peaceful

00:34:05.600 and then he said

00:34:06.620 because he expects Trump to win

00:34:08.420 perfect

00:34:09.760 perfect

00:34:10.900 and

00:34:12.300 but of course

00:34:13.260 you know

00:34:13.640 he wasn't saying

00:34:14.800 it would only be peaceful

00:34:16.040 if Trump wins

00:34:17.080 he was just

00:34:18.180 you know

00:34:18.460 projecting that he thinks he will

00:34:19.660 but then he said

00:34:21.540 and I quote

00:34:22.440 but

00:34:23.420 if there are problems

00:34:25.220 of course

00:34:26.300 in the same way

00:34:27.320 Democrats protested

00:34:28.660 in 2004

00:34:29.520 and Trump raised

00:34:31.080 in 2020

00:34:31.740 we will make sure

00:34:33.540 every ballot is counted

00:34:34.760 there we go

00:34:36.260 there we go

00:34:38.100 if there are problems

00:34:41.360 he almost got there

00:34:44.180 this is

00:34:45.940 very close

00:34:47.460 to a perfect answer

00:34:48.940 but it's short

00:34:49.760 so I'm gonna

00:34:51.000 I'm gonna criticize it

00:34:52.300 at the same time

00:34:53.600 I'm gonna say

00:34:54.240 it's the best I've seen

00:34:55.800 nobody's been closer

00:34:58.280 to getting this perfect

00:34:59.380 he got really close

00:35:01.420 but

00:35:02.780 that last 10%

00:35:04.440 that he fell short

00:35:05.960 on this answer

00:35:06.720 is the 10% 0.99

00:35:08.440 between a landslide victory

00:35:10.360 and making no difference

00:35:11.660 at all

00:35:12.000 it's just so close

00:35:14.160 and here

00:35:15.020 here's the difference

00:35:16.120 between landslide victory

00:35:17.740 and making no difference

00:35:20.220 at all

00:35:20.620 he should have gone

00:35:24.080 on offense

00:35:24.660 so he was

00:35:27.000 completely on defense

00:35:28.060 and boy

00:35:29.220 did he do a good job

00:35:30.200 on defense

00:35:30.900 boy

00:35:32.060 if you were gonna say

00:35:33.100 did he defend himself

00:35:34.400 well

00:35:34.820 yeah

00:35:35.700 yeah

00:35:36.860 great

00:35:37.640 good

00:35:38.720 good defense

00:35:39.680 except

00:35:41.080 the Democrats

00:35:43.320 when they ask the questions

00:35:44.400 this way

00:35:45.120 are exposing

00:35:46.860 their soft underbelly

00:35:48.380 meaning

00:35:49.680 that they're providing 0.99

00:35:51.020 a kill shot 1.00

00:35:52.100 if you wanted 1.00

00:35:53.540 to go on offense

00:35:54.460 he came close

00:35:56.140 to offense

00:35:56.760 he came close

00:35:58.180 when he

00:35:58.640 when he took it

00:35:59.280 out of the domain

00:35:59.980 of counting the votes

00:36:01.060 and it's the domain

00:36:02.460 of the

00:36:02.880 the information manipulation

00:36:04.340 by the press

00:36:05.240 but it's gonna feel

00:36:06.760 to the public

00:36:07.360 like a little bit

00:36:08.120 of a weaselly

00:36:09.160 avoidance of the question

00:36:10.640 because he

00:36:11.780 he wanted to avoid

00:36:12.640 the vote counting issue

00:36:13.880 and go to

00:36:14.560 another issue

00:36:15.340 that he could make hay with

00:36:16.520 good defense

00:36:17.780 good defense

00:36:19.640 here's what offense

00:36:21.940 looks like

00:36:22.720 Mr. Vance

00:36:25.200 uh

00:36:25.600 where are you willing

00:36:27.560 to accept the

00:36:28.520 uh the outcome

00:36:29.300 of the election

00:36:29.960 and have a peaceful

00:36:31.120 transfer

00:36:31.680 um

00:36:33.640 before I answer

00:36:34.880 uh

00:36:35.940 I think for the benefit

00:36:36.760 of the audience

00:36:37.340 we'll need some

00:36:38.040 clarification

00:36:38.520 what are you talking

00:36:40.460 about

00:36:40.720 well

00:36:41.820 are you talking

00:36:42.440 about an election

00:36:43.120 that looks

00:36:43.940 to all observers

00:36:45.120 like it looks

00:36:46.280 clean

00:36:46.820 well I'm asking you

00:36:50.340 will you accept

00:36:50.920 the election

00:36:51.320 I know

00:36:51.720 but

00:36:51.980 one could imagine

00:36:53.560 there could be

00:36:54.060 an election

00:36:54.500 where even

00:36:55.540 objective observers

00:36:56.720 think

00:36:57.120 oh that's very

00:36:57.860 non-standard

00:36:58.860 so I'm asking you

00:37:01.060 just so I answer

00:37:01.800 your question

00:37:02.920 correctly

00:37:03.460 are you saying

00:37:04.580 if the election

00:37:05.260 looks like

00:37:06.680 something's deeply

00:37:07.540 wrong with it

00:37:08.640 will I accept it

00:37:09.660 is that your question

00:37:10.680 oh no

00:37:12.240 no

00:37:12.520 uh

00:37:12.860 if it's like

00:37:13.960 uh

00:37:14.340 if it's like

00:37:15.140 2020

00:37:15.540 oh

00:37:16.780 well you know

00:37:17.280 2020

00:37:17.680 was very different

00:37:19.800 from a lot of

00:37:20.620 projections

00:37:21.120 and there were

00:37:22.240 a lot of

00:37:22.560 bellwether states

00:37:23.640 that didn't go

00:37:24.560 in the direction

00:37:25.740 anybody had ever

00:37:26.460 seen before

00:37:27.140 is that

00:37:28.780 is that what

00:37:29.420 you're talking

00:37:29.800 about

00:37:30.080 are you saying

00:37:31.060 that if the

00:37:31.520 next election

00:37:32.380 also violates

00:37:34.100 a lot of

00:37:34.640 expectations

00:37:35.380 and bellwethers

00:37:36.380 and looks

00:37:37.200 very non-standard

00:37:38.380 compared to

00:37:38.940 what we would

00:37:39.440 expect

00:37:39.840 is that the

00:37:40.720 situation

00:37:41.160 you're asking

00:37:41.680 about

00:37:42.000 it's a kill 0.98

00:37:44.840 shot 1.00

00:37:45.240 you could make

00:37:46.460 the questioner

00:37:47.520 just melt

00:37:49.340 you

00:37:50.860 you're

00:37:51.540 you're

00:37:51.840 making

00:37:52.180 you're trying

00:37:52.680 to make me

00:37:53.120 think past

00:37:53.760 the sale

00:37:54.260 the sale

00:37:55.900 that you're

00:37:56.460 trying to

00:37:56.800 make

00:37:57.160 is that

00:37:57.660 the election

00:37:58.080 looks perfect

00:37:58.920 in every

00:37:59.740 way

00:38:00.020 if the

00:38:01.240 election

00:38:01.540 looks perfect

00:38:02.240 in every

00:38:02.660 way

00:38:02.940 i can

00:38:03.420 commit

00:38:03.800 100%

00:38:05.000 we're going

00:38:05.520 to accept

00:38:05.900 it

00:38:06.140 there will

00:38:06.820 be a

00:38:07.160 peaceful

00:38:07.460 transfer

00:38:07.980 of power

00:38:08.440 and the

00:38:08.800 people

00:38:09.060 will have

00:38:09.480 spoken

00:38:09.800 is that

00:38:11.220 what you're

00:38:11.460 talking about

00:38:11.980 one that

00:38:12.640 doesn't have

00:38:13.080 any problems

00:38:13.760 and there

00:38:14.120 are no

00:38:14.320 questions

00:38:14.740 when you

00:38:15.120 look at

00:38:15.540 it

00:38:15.700 and even

00:38:16.360 the

00:38:16.560 republicans

00:38:17.240 and even

00:38:18.240 the most

00:38:18.720 ardent

00:38:20.480 democrats

00:38:21.120 could look

00:38:21.580 at it

00:38:21.900 and say

00:38:22.180 yeah that

00:38:22.560 looks fair

00:38:23.060 i don't

00:38:24.160 see any

00:38:24.500 problems

00:38:24.800 with that

00:38:25.140 somebody

00:38:29.460 just lost

00:38:30.060 the

00:38:30.400 did you

00:38:32.160 really lose

00:38:32.620 the sound

00:38:33.080 i can't

00:38:36.160 tell if

00:38:36.440 i'm being

00:38:36.720 pranked

00:38:37.700 hey paul

00:38:39.420 are you

00:38:39.680 still there

00:38:40.120 i need

00:38:42.540 a

00:38:42.780 i need

00:38:43.500 a sound

00:38:43.860 check

00:38:44.120 paul

00:38:44.460 i have

00:38:46.560 to ask

00:38:46.840 somebody

00:38:47.200 i can

00:38:47.560 trust

00:38:47.940 on the

00:38:48.520 networks

00:38:49.380 i'm getting

00:38:51.880 pranked

00:38:52.360 in the

00:38:52.580 comments

00:38:53.000 there's

00:38:55.420 no problem

00:38:55.820 with the

00:38:56.060 sound

00:38:56.320 right

00:38:56.560 all right

00:38:57.680 good

00:38:57.960 so that's

00:39:01.480 the thing

00:39:01.860 if

00:39:02.680 if anybody

00:39:03.840 asked

00:39:04.300 vance

00:39:04.940 or trump

00:39:05.460 that question

00:39:06.180 or any

00:39:06.740 of their

00:39:07.000 pundits

00:39:07.480 the person

00:39:09.000 before answering

00:39:09.900 you have

00:39:10.700 to say

00:39:11.220 i need a

00:39:13.260 clarification

00:39:13.680 on your

00:39:14.180 question

00:39:14.540 do you

00:39:15.420 mean if

00:39:15.760 it looks

00:39:16.180 like it's

00:39:16.640 fraudulent

00:39:17.240 or do you

00:39:17.940 mean if

00:39:18.200 it looks

00:39:18.480 perfect

00:39:18.960 it's a 0.99

00:39:22.040 kill shot

00:39:22.540 it's the 1.00

00:39:23.640 end of

00:39:23.980 that question

00:39:24.520 and it's

00:39:25.780 their biggest

00:39:26.320 it's their

00:39:26.820 biggest issue

00:39:27.600 that he

00:39:28.640 won't you

00:39:29.200 know he'll

00:39:29.620 stay in

00:39:30.220 office

00:39:30.600 but nobody

00:39:32.380 would be

00:39:33.080 able to get

00:39:33.480 past that

00:39:33.980 question

00:39:34.380 it's a

00:39:35.480 kill shot

00:39:35.920 there aren't 0.95

00:39:37.140 very many

00:39:37.620 kill shots 0.86

00:39:38.220 that are 1.00

00:39:38.520 this clean

00:39:39.200 this is a 0.83

00:39:40.740 clean kill 0.99

00:39:41.480 shot

00:39:41.880 and it

00:39:42.660 keeps being

00:39:43.780 presented

00:39:44.240 over and

00:39:45.160 over again

00:39:45.780 and nobody

00:39:46.660 takes the

00:39:47.180 shot

00:39:47.540 and i'm not

00:39:49.000 exactly sure

00:39:49.880 what's going

00:39:50.300 on there

00:39:50.760 but take 0.99

00:39:52.000 the shot 0.87

00:39:52.520 take the

00:39:53.580 shot next

00:39:54.040 time

00:39:54.320 jd i think

00:39:55.340 you could end

00:39:55.820 this thing

00:39:56.240 claudia was

00:39:57.600 leaving for her

00:39:58.200 pickleball

00:39:58.600 tournament

00:39:59.000 i've been

00:39:59.400 visualizing my

00:40:00.200 match all

00:40:00.860 week

00:40:01.320 she was so

00:40:02.260 focused on

00:40:02.760 visualizing that

00:40:03.640 she didn't see

00:40:04.240 the column behind

00:40:04.900 her car on

00:40:05.680 her backhand 0.98

00:40:06.220 side

00:40:06.640 good thing

00:40:08.360 claudia's

00:40:08.800 with intact

00:40:09.400 the insurer

00:40:10.160 with the

00:40:10.580 largest network

00:40:11.280 of auto

00:40:11.660 service centers

00:40:12.260 in the country

00:40:13.040 everything was

00:40:13.900 taken care of

00:40:14.540 under one roof

00:40:15.300 and she was

00:40:15.820 on her way

00:40:16.220 in a rental

00:40:16.640 car in no

00:40:17.380 time

00:40:17.700 i made it

00:40:18.440 to my

00:40:18.740 tournament

00:40:19.180 and lost

00:40:20.260 in the first

00:40:20.660 round

00:40:21.040 but you got

00:40:22.120 there on time

00:40:22.820 intact insurance

00:40:23.960 your auto

00:40:24.700 service ace

00:40:25.420 certain conditions

00:40:26.320 apply

00:40:26.700 anyway

00:40:29.040 have you seen

00:40:30.720 the ads

00:40:31.240 men for

00:40:32.180 harris

00:40:32.860 the men

00:40:33.760 who say

00:40:34.220 they're

00:40:35.100 supporting

00:40:35.600 harris

00:40:36.040 there's a

00:40:36.880 new campaign

00:40:37.480 ad from

00:40:38.020 that group

00:40:38.700 and

00:40:39.740 so it

00:40:41.960 purports to

00:40:42.660 show

00:40:42.960 tim waltz

00:40:43.880 in a number

00:40:44.420 of

00:40:44.880 manly

00:40:46.400 pursuits

00:40:47.000 you know

00:40:48.360 he's using

00:40:49.200 tools

00:40:49.680 he's driving

00:40:50.420 cars

00:40:50.920 he's he

00:40:51.660 owns guns

00:40:52.320 he's got

00:40:52.800 a dog

00:40:53.360 he's a

00:40:54.000 man's

00:40:54.780 man

00:40:55.100 but i

00:40:56.360 have to

00:40:56.680 say that

00:40:57.300 if i can

00:40:58.180 advise one

00:40:59.200 thing for

00:40:59.780 the harris

00:41:00.180 campaign

00:41:00.700 you should

00:41:03.700 hire at

00:41:04.640 least one

00:41:05.320 heterosexual 0.84

00:41:06.120 man

00:41:06.620 and you

00:41:07.820 would not

00:41:08.180 embarrass

00:41:08.540 yourself

00:41:09.060 this much

00:41:10.200 because if

00:41:11.500 you saw

00:41:11.880 the commercial

00:41:12.440 it is the 0.99

00:41:13.780 gayest 1.00

00:41:14.560 looking thing 0.99

00:41:15.920 you've ever

00:41:16.320 seen in your

00:41:16.880 life

00:41:17.240 while trying

00:41:18.220 to to

00:41:19.200 teach us

00:41:19.780 how manly

00:41:20.500 he is

00:41:20.960 and

00:41:21.860 you know

00:41:23.240 this is not

00:41:23.740 a criticism

00:41:24.300 against anybody

00:41:25.120 gay 0.99

00:41:25.560 i'm just 0.95

00:41:26.400 saying

00:41:26.760 if i were

00:41:27.700 doing a

00:41:28.180 commercial

00:41:28.560 about how

00:41:29.320 to be a

00:41:29.800 gay man 0.80

00:41:30.360 i would 1.00

00:41:31.480 hire a 0.99

00:41:31.920 gay man 0.99

00:41:32.500 i wouldn't 1.00

00:41:34.640 hire a 0.99

00:41:35.160 lesbian 0.99

00:41:35.560 i would

00:41:36.980 if the

00:41:37.600 commercial is

00:41:38.360 let's show

00:41:38.820 this guy

00:41:39.240 as a

00:41:39.520 heterosexual 0.84

00:41:40.100 man

00:41:40.520 i would

00:41:41.340 have

00:41:41.540 heterosexual 0.84

00:41:42.220 men

00:41:42.560 working on

00:41:43.100 it

00:41:43.300 and nobody

00:41:44.520 else

00:41:44.920 because they

00:41:47.400 know

00:41:47.820 far better

00:41:49.400 what it's

00:41:50.060 like to be

00:41:50.540 a heterosexual

00:41:51.180 man

00:41:51.520 again if

00:41:52.380 it were 0.99

00:41:52.600 for black 0.92

00:41:53.180 voters

00:41:53.620 i'd make

00:41:54.520 sure that

00:41:54.980 the

00:41:55.180 commercial

00:41:55.580 was mostly

00:41:56.320 managed by

00:41:56.960 black voters 0.90

00:41:58.080 because they 0.97

00:41:58.820 would know 0.88

00:41:59.120 what black

00:41:59.540 voters are

00:42:00.640 feeling and

00:42:01.160 thinking better

00:42:01.720 than other

00:42:02.060 people would

00:42:02.540 so harris

00:42:04.280 campaign needs

00:42:05.020 to find at

00:42:05.660 least one

00:42:06.300 heterosexual 0.84

00:42:06.980 man

00:42:07.500 maybe a

00:42:08.900 token

00:42:09.180 you know

00:42:10.340 you don't

00:42:10.640 have to

00:42:10.900 give them

00:42:11.140 a lot

00:42:11.440 of power

00:42:11.860 but at

00:42:13.020 least put

00:42:13.360 them in

00:42:13.560 the room

00:42:14.080 to say

00:42:15.460 um

00:42:16.460 that uh

00:42:17.860 that looks 0.99

00:42:19.200 super gay 0.99

00:42:19.900 just you know 0.99

00:42:22.740 so they know

00:42:23.240 it before they

00:42:23.760 put it out

00:42:24.280 so that's my

00:42:24.980 advice

00:42:25.340 they need a

00:42:26.600 heterosexual 0.84

00:42:27.260 man to do

00:42:27.880 some serious

00:42:28.660 mansplaining

00:42:29.460 it's just one

00:42:31.760 of the one

00:42:32.240 of the times

00:42:32.640 mansplaining is

00:42:33.600 exactly what

00:42:34.300 you need

00:42:34.680 um did you

00:42:37.140 know that uh

00:42:38.180 the the ad

00:42:39.700 probably the

00:42:40.700 first ad you

00:42:41.380 saw for a

00:42:42.160 kamala kamala

00:42:43.000 harris ad that

00:42:44.600 was men for

00:42:45.300 kamala was

00:42:46.100 written by one

00:42:46.700 of jimmy

00:42:47.200 kimmel's

00:42:47.640 writers jacob

00:42:48.880 reed and uh

00:42:51.380 uh apparently

00:42:54.720 none of the

00:42:55.400 men who were

00:42:55.920 used in that

00:42:56.580 ad of men

00:42:57.680 for kamala

00:42:58.320 were actual

00:42:59.600 uh regular

00:43:00.580 people they

00:43:02.060 were paid

00:43:02.680 actors so

00:43:04.480 the men for

00:43:05.280 kamala weren't

00:43:06.920 even the men

00:43:07.600 for kamala i

00:43:08.520 mean they might

00:43:09.000 also be for

00:43:10.180 her but they 0.78

00:43:11.200 were paid

00:43:11.560 actors i i

00:43:13.880 guess they

00:43:14.260 couldn't get

00:43:14.680 any like real

00:43:16.460 normal men that

00:43:17.720 look good on

00:43:18.300 camera who

00:43:18.940 would just say

00:43:19.580 that they were

00:43:20.020 for kamala

00:43:20.580 harris i'm

00:43:22.160 pretty sure

00:43:22.640 there are tens

00:43:23.140 of millions of

00:43:23.820 them but they

00:43:24.340 couldn't find

00:43:24.780 anybody they

00:43:25.300 were happy

00:43:25.640 with so

00:43:26.100 they got

00:43:26.720 actors well

00:43:29.240 harris has

00:43:29.820 released her

00:43:30.600 uh health

00:43:31.900 records i

00:43:33.240 think trump

00:43:33.940 has not for

00:43:35.080 this cycle

00:43:35.640 um but what

00:43:37.260 i wonder is

00:43:38.620 did they test

00:43:39.400 her for drugs 1.00

00:43:40.240 and why not

00:43:42.300 if i'm going

00:43:44.480 to see a

00:43:45.260 presidential

00:43:45.740 candidate's

00:43:46.860 um health

00:43:48.400 records

00:43:49.000 and it

00:43:50.180 doesn't have

00:43:50.600 a drug

00:43:50.960 test

00:43:51.380 i don't

00:43:53.640 really think

00:43:54.160 i've seen

00:43:54.560 the records

00:43:55.160 because if

00:43:56.720 somebody is

00:43:57.400 acting so

00:43:58.560 drunk or

00:43:59.460 inebriated on

00:44:00.460 something then

00:44:01.620 it becomes a

00:44:02.280 major campaign

00:44:03.360 question and

00:44:05.080 you don't reveal

00:44:05.880 any you know

00:44:06.960 drug tests that

00:44:07.960 would indicate a

00:44:09.160 drug problem or

00:44:10.120 any other drug

00:44:10.820 use um i'm

00:44:12.680 going to say

00:44:13.020 that's not

00:44:13.480 actually a

00:44:14.080 health record

00:44:14.660 or even

00:44:16.040 close that

00:44:17.520 would be a

00:44:18.080 partial that

00:44:19.700 would be a

00:44:20.160 partial health

00:44:21.020 record intentionally

00:44:22.680 keeping out

00:44:23.520 important elements

00:44:24.820 now if it were

00:44:26.140 trump i probably

00:44:27.040 wouldn't even ask

00:44:27.640 for that

00:44:28.060 because you

00:44:29.840 know he's so

00:44:30.220 famously a

00:44:30.960 non-drinker and

00:44:31.920 he never looks

00:44:33.100 like he's on

00:44:33.600 any kind of

00:44:34.020 drug so i

00:44:36.520 think we need

00:44:37.060 to know she

00:44:37.760 needs a drug

00:44:38.300 test and i

00:44:39.780 don't mean that

00:44:40.380 purely politically

00:44:41.540 i i've seen

00:44:43.900 how she acts

00:44:44.780 and i don't

00:44:46.740 want that person

00:44:47.760 in charge of

00:44:48.500 the nuclear

00:44:49.080 football so

00:44:51.300 you need to

00:44:52.080 you need to

00:44:52.600 tell me is

00:44:53.280 that real is

00:44:54.980 the way you're

00:44:55.480 acting in that

00:44:56.120 video real or

00:44:58.360 are you drunk

00:44:59.180 because if it's

00:45:01.000 drunk i don't

00:45:02.080 want you near the 0.75

00:45:02.840 nuclear button i

00:45:05.620 mean really

00:45:06.220 seriously that's

00:45:07.180 important so

00:45:09.620 anyway

00:45:10.680 um i heard

00:45:15.820 today in the

00:45:16.800 comments to

00:45:17.760 uh post about

00:45:19.300 tim wals a

00:45:20.360 set of

00:45:20.920 accusations

00:45:21.580 that were

00:45:23.360 very specific

00:45:24.740 and very

00:45:26.940 terrible

00:45:27.420 they are

00:45:29.480 sufficiently

00:45:30.220 terrible

00:45:30.840 uh it's an

00:45:32.580 accusation of

00:45:33.560 a past

00:45:34.200 behavior

00:45:34.820 uh during

00:45:36.140 his football

00:45:37.280 coaching years

00:45:38.180 now it is

00:45:40.140 so bad

00:45:40.880 that i'm not

00:45:41.800 going to

00:45:42.160 repeat it

00:45:42.900 okay and

00:45:44.420 it's not

00:45:44.800 from it's

00:45:45.460 not from a

00:45:46.360 credible source

00:45:48.440 meaning some

00:45:50.200 platform that i

00:45:51.080 would believe

00:45:51.960 it's from an

00:45:53.080 individual but

00:45:53.940 the the thing

00:45:54.760 that bothered me

00:45:55.400 about it is it

00:45:56.180 was really

00:45:56.600 detailed

00:45:57.120 it was really

00:45:58.820 detailed

00:45:59.300 so maybe

00:46:02.500 there's something

00:46:03.080 to come out

00:46:03.840 i'm definitely

00:46:05.440 not going to

00:46:05.980 tell you what

00:46:06.460 i read

00:46:06.960 because of

00:46:08.140 the source

00:46:08.620 but if

00:46:10.860 it's true

00:46:11.440 wow

00:46:14.080 thanks paul

00:46:15.920 if it's

00:46:18.200 true

00:46:18.440 well the

00:46:22.300 polling

00:46:22.820 information is

00:46:24.040 all over the

00:46:24.560 place

00:46:24.960 the

00:46:26.000 538

00:46:27.960 forecasts

00:46:29.460 as harris

00:46:30.140 remains ahead

00:46:30.900 in pennsylvania

00:46:31.620 nevada wisconsin

00:46:32.520 and michigan

00:46:33.140 which would

00:46:35.220 give her enough

00:46:35.720 to win

00:46:36.160 538

00:46:39.280 have you heard

00:46:39.780 of them

00:46:40.040 538

00:46:40.840 so that used

00:46:42.460 to be

00:46:43.340 nate silver's

00:46:44.580 entity

00:46:45.980 but he sold

00:46:47.580 that and he's

00:46:48.220 out of that

00:46:48.700 now i think

00:46:49.960 it's just

00:46:50.360 the new york

00:46:51.080 times owns it

00:46:51.960 there's the

00:46:52.800 new york times

00:46:53.420 own 538

00:46:54.300 i'm not sure

00:46:55.680 who owns it

00:46:56.360 but this is

00:46:57.820 a different

00:46:58.300 result than

00:46:58.940 i'm seeing

00:46:59.340 in other

00:46:59.760 news

00:47:00.140 in other

00:47:02.040 news

00:47:02.560 real clear

00:47:03.820 politics

00:47:04.340 is flipping

00:47:05.020 nevada

00:47:05.520 for trump

00:47:06.140 which i think

00:47:06.960 would give

00:47:07.360 him all

00:47:07.840 of the

00:47:08.120 swing states

00:47:08.860 because i've

00:47:10.260 been hearing

00:47:10.620 the last

00:47:11.000 24 hours

00:47:11.800 oh it looks

00:47:12.300 like trump's

00:47:12.860 going to win

00:47:13.200 all the

00:47:13.500 swing states

00:47:14.220 or could

00:47:15.400 with the

00:47:16.360 exception

00:47:16.700 of nevada

00:47:17.460 and then

00:47:18.800 today's news

00:47:19.480 is oh

00:47:20.480 he's going

00:47:20.720 to win

00:47:20.920 nevada

00:47:21.360 now keep

00:47:24.080 in mind

00:47:24.560 that i

00:47:25.740 don't

00:47:25.920 believe

00:47:26.420 anything

00:47:28.100 about the

00:47:29.360 polls at

00:47:29.980 the moment

00:47:30.460 they're just

00:47:31.380 all over

00:47:31.940 the place

00:47:32.480 and they're 0.99

00:47:33.000 crazy and 0.99

00:47:33.760 they disagree 0.98

00:47:34.280 with each

00:47:34.780 other

00:47:35.020 but the

00:47:36.300 so on

00:47:37.560 one hand

00:47:38.160 538 says

00:47:39.740 harris is

00:47:40.400 ahead in

00:47:41.140 the swing

00:47:41.600 states

00:47:42.120 on the

00:47:43.480 other hand

00:47:43.920 real clear

00:47:44.460 politics

00:47:45.040 says that

00:47:46.140 he's she's

00:47:47.200 so far

00:47:47.580 behind she's

00:47:48.260 even gonna

00:47:48.680 lose nevada

00:47:49.460 in other

00:47:52.440 news

00:47:52.980 the apparently

00:47:54.680 the number

00:47:55.200 of mail-in

00:47:56.000 votes is

00:47:56.580 way way

00:47:57.300 down in

00:47:58.100 in the

00:47:58.820 swing states

00:47:59.540 and that

00:48:00.680 presumably

00:48:01.360 would help

00:48:01.980 trump

00:48:02.380 we don't

00:48:03.160 know

00:48:03.500 so

00:48:04.760 it does

00:48:07.360 seem and

00:48:07.940 and then

00:48:08.320 there's another

00:48:08.880 thought that

00:48:10.480 i think

00:48:11.720 was it

00:48:12.360 mark

00:48:12.560 halperin

00:48:13.020 who's saying

00:48:13.360 this that

00:48:14.220 the the

00:48:15.260 internal polls

00:48:16.260 are worse

00:48:17.160 than the

00:48:17.540 public ones

00:48:18.200 and the

00:48:19.140 reason is

00:48:19.700 that the

00:48:20.020 internal ones

00:48:20.820 are maybe

00:48:21.280 the expensive

00:48:22.600 and good

00:48:23.100 ones

00:48:23.440 so

00:48:25.120 we'll see

00:48:27.000 rasmussen

00:48:28.080 is signaling

00:48:29.420 that trump's

00:48:30.760 you know

00:48:31.720 got a got

00:48:32.340 a solid

00:48:32.840 situation

00:48:34.020 here

00:48:34.340 and then

00:48:35.480 if you

00:48:36.280 looked at

00:48:36.720 the the

00:48:38.320 results

00:48:38.780 against trump

00:48:39.880 the funny

00:48:40.880 thing about

00:48:41.300 having trump

00:48:41.840 run for

00:48:42.240 election three

00:48:42.840 times in a

00:48:43.380 row is

00:48:44.240 that you

00:48:44.740 have a

00:48:45.020 baseline to

00:48:45.660 compare things

00:48:46.320 to that's

00:48:46.780 really interesting

00:48:47.380 and harris is

00:48:49.340 doing way

00:48:50.260 worse

00:48:50.760 compared to

00:48:53.820 either biden

00:48:55.000 who won

00:48:56.840 and also to

00:48:59.020 hillary 0.96

00:48:59.440 who lost

00:49:00.320 so

00:49:01.720 kamala is

00:49:02.900 way under

00:49:03.800 the numbers

00:49:05.000 that even

00:49:05.500 clinton had

00:49:06.460 when she

00:49:06.800 lost

00:49:07.260 although lost

00:49:08.780 very narrowly

00:49:09.840 so

00:49:10.900 what's

00:49:13.540 confusing

00:49:14.120 is

00:49:14.660 the harris

00:49:15.640 in the

00:49:16.500 polls

00:49:16.720 anyway

00:49:17.000 seems to

00:49:17.860 be maybe

00:49:18.480 one point

00:49:19.260 ahead or

00:49:19.940 effectively

00:49:20.620 within the

00:49:21.200 margin of

00:49:21.620 error on

00:49:22.420 a whole

00:49:22.720 bunch of

00:49:23.180 states

00:49:23.600 depending on

00:49:24.960 which poll

00:49:25.940 you're looking

00:49:26.300 at

00:49:26.520 and most

00:49:28.340 of the

00:49:28.560 smart people

00:49:29.040 would say

00:49:29.460 that if

00:49:29.880 he's tied

00:49:30.520 in the

00:49:30.920 polling

00:49:31.260 or within

00:49:33.280 one

00:49:33.660 it's actually

00:49:34.940 a win

00:49:35.320 because he

00:49:36.060 he always

00:49:36.680 performs better

00:49:37.600 than the

00:49:37.940 polls

00:49:38.220 but the

00:49:38.800 others

00:49:39.020 don't

00:49:39.940 so

00:49:40.740 if that's

00:49:42.200 true

00:49:42.520 that this

00:49:43.240 time he's

00:49:43.820 also going

00:49:44.320 to perform

00:49:44.760 better than

00:49:45.220 the polls

00:49:45.700 and I'm

00:49:46.760 speculating

00:49:47.640 that this

00:49:48.120 will be

00:49:48.400 the biggest

00:49:49.260 difference

00:49:50.560 between the

00:49:51.180 polls

00:49:51.560 and the

00:49:52.060 actual vote

00:49:52.700 so this

00:49:53.900 is my

00:49:54.220 prediction

00:49:54.580 so this

00:49:55.800 will be

00:49:56.000 the third

00:49:56.520 Trump run

00:49:57.360 and each

00:49:58.620 time they

00:49:59.080 say what

00:49:59.540 they think

00:49:59.980 the Trump

00:50:00.380 vote will

00:50:00.760 be and

00:50:01.300 each time

00:50:01.720 it's

00:50:01.920 bigger

00:50:02.600 two out of

00:50:03.880 three so

00:50:04.320 far

00:50:04.600 if this

00:50:05.800 one is

00:50:06.140 I think

00:50:06.500 this one

00:50:06.860 also would

00:50:07.240 be bigger

00:50:07.620 but I'm

00:50:08.320 going to

00:50:08.500 predict

00:50:08.800 it's the

00:50:09.300 biggest

00:50:09.700 of the

00:50:11.340 differences

00:50:11.820 that there

00:50:13.260 are more

00:50:13.620 people who

00:50:14.200 are intentionally

00:50:14.960 just pranking

00:50:15.980 the pollsters

00:50:16.660 than at any

00:50:17.840 time in the

00:50:18.320 past and

00:50:19.360 that they

00:50:19.760 know it's

00:50:20.180 part of

00:50:20.460 winning

00:50:22.140 because they're

00:50:23.340 trying to

00:50:24.420 use a

00:50:25.680 prank

00:50:26.120 basically to

00:50:27.420 defeat what

00:50:28.160 they think

00:50:28.640 will be

00:50:28.960 cheaters

00:50:29.340 so if they

00:50:30.860 prank hard

00:50:31.540 enough

00:50:31.900 the cheaters

00:50:32.900 won't know

00:50:33.420 how hard

00:50:33.900 they have

00:50:34.220 to cheat

00:50:34.700 and they

00:50:35.700 may under

00:50:36.200 cheat

00:50:36.560 which

00:50:37.460 the belief

00:50:38.720 is that

00:50:39.220 that's what

00:50:39.600 happened in

00:50:40.060 2016

00:50:40.640 I don't

00:50:41.500 have any

00:50:41.840 evidence of

00:50:42.380 that

00:50:42.560 I think

00:50:43.580 Jim Cramer

00:50:44.180 came out

00:50:45.080 and said

00:50:45.400 that Harris

00:50:45.940 is going

00:50:46.260 to win

00:50:46.560 Jim Cramer

00:50:48.400 is sort of

00:50:48.900 famous as a

00:50:49.660 counter indicator

00:50:50.520 so you can

00:50:53.740 interpret that

00:50:54.680 any way you

00:50:55.140 want

00:50:55.380 Axios is

00:51:00.820 trying to

00:51:01.260 soften the

00:51:01.820 fact that

00:51:02.340 people are

00:51:02.780 learning that

00:51:04.000 Democrats

00:51:04.580 challenge

00:51:05.160 elections

00:51:05.700 too

00:51:06.000 so Axios

00:51:07.420 says that

00:51:08.780 when the

00:51:09.080 Democrats

00:51:09.480 challenge

00:51:10.100 elections

00:51:10.640 it's largely

00:51:11.280 symbolic

00:51:12.020 not like

00:51:14.860 those serious

00:51:15.540 challenges

00:51:16.040 coming from

00:51:16.680 the Republicans

00:51:17.300 so when

00:51:18.820 they do it

00:51:19.180 it's just

00:51:19.500 talk

00:51:19.900 it's largely

00:51:21.020 symbolic

00:51:21.720 for example

00:51:23.160 in 2017

00:51:24.940 or in

00:51:26.640 let's say

00:51:27.560 2005

00:51:28.360 Democrats

00:51:29.560 objected to

00:51:30.420 Bush's win

00:51:31.620 in Ohio

00:51:32.560 but you

00:51:33.860 know they

00:51:34.160 just sort

00:51:34.640 of went

00:51:34.860 through the

00:51:35.160 process

00:51:35.520 and worked

00:51:36.200 it out

00:51:36.620 and you

00:51:37.500 know they're

00:51:37.720 largely

00:51:38.020 symbolic

00:51:38.580 now is

00:51:40.920 it symbolic

00:51:41.520 if you have

00:51:42.060 to recount

00:51:42.620 the hanging

00:51:43.120 chads

00:51:43.640 symbolic is

00:51:46.180 when you

00:51:46.460 don't do

00:51:46.840 anything in

00:51:47.420 the real

00:51:47.720 world

00:51:48.160 they have

00:51:49.560 to recount

00:51:50.200 a recount

00:51:51.360 is not

00:51:51.640 symbolic

00:51:52.160 that would

00:51:54.020 be the

00:51:54.280 opposite

00:51:54.620 the recount

00:51:55.620 is an

00:51:55.960 actual set

00:51:56.920 of actions

00:51:57.500 that happened

00:51:57.960 in the real

00:51:58.440 world

00:51:58.780 that's

00:51:59.660 not

00:52:00.200 symbolic

00:52:00.680 that was

00:52:01.760 actually

00:52:02.060 trying to

00:52:02.500 find out

00:52:02.820 who won

00:52:03.240 about

00:52:04.560 2017

00:52:05.300 with half

00:52:05.960 a dozen

00:52:06.300 Democrats

00:52:06.820 filed

00:52:07.200 objections

00:52:07.780 to

00:52:09.480 Trump's

00:52:10.080 elector

00:52:10.500 slates

00:52:10.960 but they

00:52:11.740 didn't get

00:52:12.080 a backing

00:52:12.480 of any

00:52:12.860 senators

00:52:13.380 so they

00:52:13.940 couldn't

00:52:14.180 force

00:52:14.520 any

00:52:14.720 votes

00:52:15.080 so

00:52:15.780 largely

00:52:16.200 symbolic

00:52:16.900 no it's

00:52:18.240 not

00:52:18.540 that was

00:52:19.580 a full-on

00:52:20.380 attempt

00:52:20.820 that just

00:52:21.680 didn't

00:52:21.940 work

00:52:22.280 there was

00:52:22.880 nothing

00:52:23.120 symbolic

00:52:23.720 about it

00:52:24.320 it just

00:52:25.620 didn't

00:52:25.860 work

00:52:26.280 Jamie

00:52:28.800 Raskin

00:52:29.300 of course

00:52:29.740 he would

00:52:30.800 be the

00:52:31.380 figurehead

00:52:32.360 of

00:52:32.640 Democrat

00:52:33.500 lying

00:52:33.940 he said

00:52:35.120 quote

00:52:35.440 Democrats

00:52:35.940 don't

00:52:36.300 engage

00:52:36.680 in

00:52:36.840 election

00:52:37.200 fraud

00:52:37.640 and

00:52:37.820 election

00:52:38.160 fabrication

00:52:38.860 now

00:52:40.700 he's

00:52:41.480 also

00:52:41.820 one of

00:52:42.300 those

00:52:42.540 backwards

00:52:43.020 indicators

00:52:43.660 that

00:52:44.800 whatever

00:52:45.180 he says

00:52:45.640 they don't

00:52:46.120 do

00:52:46.360 oh they're

00:52:47.320 definitely

00:52:47.600 doing

00:52:47.900 that

00:52:48.240 so

00:52:50.320 if he

00:52:51.320 ever

00:52:51.480 tells you

00:52:51.940 they're

00:52:52.280 definitely

00:52:52.740 not

00:52:53.100 sacrificing

00:52:53.900 children

00:52:54.540 in

00:52:54.860 satanic

00:52:55.380 rituals

00:52:55.880 they're

00:52:57.720 definitely

00:52:58.320 sacrificing

00:52:59.220 children

00:52:59.760 in

00:53:00.260 satanic

00:53:00.820 rituals

00:53:01.400 by the

00:53:02.080 way

00:53:02.220 I don't

00:53:02.580 believe

00:53:02.820 that

00:53:03.180 but I

00:53:04.560 also

00:53:04.680 don't

00:53:04.900 rule

00:53:05.120 it out

00:53:05.560 I

00:53:07.200 think

00:53:07.360 it's

00:53:07.520 highly

00:53:07.800 unlikely

00:53:08.300 that

00:53:09.500 there's

00:53:09.780 a

00:53:09.940 massive

00:53:10.280 national

00:53:11.080 satanic

00:53:12.260 network

00:53:12.680 that the

00:53:13.440 Democrats

00:53:13.920 are all

00:53:14.260 plugged

00:53:14.520 into

00:53:14.880 and

00:53:15.200 Diddy

00:53:15.540 and Epstein

00:53:16.080 and all

00:53:16.480 that

00:53:16.680 I don't

00:53:17.480 think

00:53:17.740 so

00:53:18.060 but we

00:53:19.920 do live

00:53:20.360 in a

00:53:20.560 world

00:53:20.780 where if

00:53:21.160 you said

00:53:21.520 would you

00:53:22.360 give it

00:53:22.620 five percent

00:53:23.420 I'd say

00:53:24.160 yeah

00:53:25.020 yeah

00:53:26.960 I'll give

00:53:27.260 it five

00:53:27.640 percent

00:53:27.980 possibly

00:53:28.760 Ontario

00:53:30.360 the wait

00:53:31.380 is over

00:53:31.980 the gold

00:53:32.640 standard of

00:53:33.200 online casinos

00:53:34.040 has arrived

00:53:34.880 golden nugget

00:53:35.800 online casino

00:53:36.640 is live

00:53:37.240 bringing

00:53:37.620 Vegas style

00:53:38.340 excitement

00:53:38.820 and a

00:53:39.320 world-class

00:53:39.860 gaming experience

00:53:40.840 right to

00:53:41.420 your fingertips

00:53:42.240 whether you're

00:53:43.160 a seasoned

00:53:43.560 player or

00:53:44.220 just starting

00:53:44.840 signing up

00:53:45.440 is fast

00:53:45.980 and simple

00:53:46.980 and in

00:53:47.560 just a few

00:53:47.980 clicks

00:53:48.320 you can

00:53:48.700 have access

00:53:49.120 to our

00:53:49.540 exclusive

00:53:50.000 library

00:53:50.460 of the

00:53:50.840 best

00:53:51.180 slots

00:53:51.540 and top

00:53:52.180 tier

00:53:52.380 table

00:53:52.700 games

00:53:53.240 make

00:53:53.560 the most

00:53:54.040 of your

00:53:54.300 downtime

00:53:54.680 with

00:53:55.000 unbeatable

00:53:55.740 promotions

00:53:56.220 and jackpots

00:53:57.020 that can

00:53:57.340 turn any

00:53:57.940 mundane

00:53:58.380 moment

00:53:58.820 into a

00:53:59.340 golden

00:53:59.700 opportunity

00:54:00.340 at golden

00:54:01.140 nugget

00:54:01.580 online casino

00:54:02.520 take a

00:54:03.180 spin on the

00:54:03.640 slots

00:54:04.020 challenge

00:54:04.440 yourself

00:54:04.820 at the

00:54:05.040 tables

00:54:05.380 or join

00:54:06.060 a live

00:54:06.480 dealer

00:54:06.720 game

00:54:07.040 to feel

00:54:07.500 the thrill

00:54:08.040 of real

00:54:08.520 time action

00:54:09.220 all from

00:54:09.840 the comfort

00:54:10.320 of your

00:54:10.600 own devices

00:54:11.200 why settle

00:54:12.020 for less

00:54:12.560 when you

00:54:12.940 can go

00:54:13.300 for the

00:54:13.640 gold

00:54:14.060 at golden

00:54:14.860 nugget

00:54:15.340 online

00:54:15.840 casino

00:54:16.420 gambling

00:54:17.220 problem

00:54:17.700 call

00:54:17.960 connects

00:54:18.360 Ontario

00:54:18.860 1-866-531-2600

00:54:21.680 19 and

00:54:22.540 over

00:54:22.840 physically

00:54:23.240 present

00:54:23.560 in Ontario

00:54:24.120 eligibility

00:54:24.700 restrictions

00:54:25.360 apply

00:54:25.820 see

00:54:26.140 golden

00:54:26.420 nugget

00:54:26.760 casino

00:54:27.100 dot com

00:54:27.680 for details

00:54:28.360 please

00:54:28.660 play

00:54:28.860 responsibly

00:54:29.560 anyway

00:54:31.560 there's

00:54:31.980 a

00:54:32.360 there's

00:54:35.920 a

00:54:36.240 piece

00:54:37.340 in

00:54:37.620 slate

00:54:38.120 slate

00:54:39.880 is a

00:54:40.220 publication

00:54:40.700 and

00:54:42.420 written

00:54:42.920 by Ben

00:54:43.560 Mathis

00:54:44.820 Lilly

00:54:45.140 and

00:54:47.320 he's

00:54:49.120 talking

00:54:49.380 about

00:54:49.720 how

00:54:50.080 people

00:54:50.920 like

00:54:51.200 me

00:54:51.620 say

00:54:52.660 that

00:54:52.900 when

00:54:53.140 Trump

00:54:53.540 says

00:54:53.980 something

00:54:54.300 that's

00:54:54.580 not

00:54:54.780 true

00:54:55.200 his

00:54:56.060 hyperbole

00:54:56.640 as I

00:54:56.960 call

00:54:57.140 it

00:54:57.420 that

00:54:58.340 and

00:54:59.100 they

00:54:59.320 quoted

00:54:59.900 me

00:55:00.120 in

00:55:00.240 the

00:55:00.340 article

00:55:00.680 quote

00:55:01.180 Trump's

00:55:01.700 hyperbole

00:55:02.160 is

00:55:02.400 directionally

00:55:03.100 accurate

00:55:03.480 and benign

00:55:04.160 and

00:55:05.800 here's

00:55:06.080 how they

00:55:06.340 described

00:55:06.840 me

00:55:07.180 they

00:55:07.960 said

00:55:08.160 Scott

00:55:08.520 Adams

00:55:08.880 the

00:55:09.220 Dilbert

00:55:09.680 creator

00:55:10.180 turned

00:55:10.760 right

00:55:11.200 wing

00:55:11.500 thought

00:55:11.900 leader

00:55:12.200 am I

00:55:15.120 a

00:55:15.300 right

00:55:15.520 wing

00:55:15.780 thought

00:55:16.160 leader

00:55:16.420 I

00:55:18.780 don't

00:55:18.900 know

00:55:19.100 not

00:55:20.260 bad

00:55:20.520 but

00:55:21.100 they

00:55:21.260 didn't

00:55:21.460 hit

00:55:21.640 me

00:55:21.800 hard

00:55:22.080 they

00:55:22.280 just

00:55:22.480 noted

00:55:22.780 that

00:55:23.240 I

00:55:25.360 I've

00:55:25.680 got

00:55:25.860 this

00:55:26.220 framing

00:55:27.040 that

00:55:27.500 is

00:55:27.660 directionally

00:55:28.340 correct

00:55:28.740 even

00:55:29.020 if

00:55:29.260 it's

00:55:29.440 hyperbolic

00:55:30.020 and

00:55:31.220 then

00:55:35.420 they

00:55:35.660 tried to

00:55:36.100 fact

00:55:36.400 check

00:55:36.640 Trump

00:55:37.080 that

00:55:38.060 at an

00:55:38.560 October

00:55:38.880 5th

00:55:39.340 rally

00:55:39.620 he

00:55:39.920 told

00:55:40.200 a

00:55:40.500 story

00:55:41.700 about

00:55:42.160 a

00:55:42.520 woman's 0.82

00:55:44.380 weightlifting

00:55:44.980 record

00:55:45.560 that was

00:55:46.600 broken

00:55:46.920 by

00:55:47.300 somebody

00:55:47.800 who

00:55:48.040 was

00:55:48.300 born

00:55:48.580 a

00:55:48.780 man

00:55:49.120 and

00:55:50.000 had

00:55:50.140 never

00:55:50.440 lifted

00:55:50.800 before

00:55:51.280 and

00:55:52.240 so

00:55:52.440 they

00:55:52.700 fact

00:55:53.060 checked

00:55:53.320 it

00:55:53.580 and

00:55:53.900 found

00:55:54.160 out

00:55:54.420 that

00:55:54.680 that

00:55:54.980 wasn't

00:55:55.360 true

00:55:55.660 but

00:55:57.840 somebody

00:55:58.460 should

00:55:58.720 tell

00:55:58.960 Zuby

00:55:59.400 because

00:55:59.740 he

00:55:59.960 thinks

00:56:00.240 he

00:56:00.400 was

00:56:00.600 the

00:56:00.740 person

00:56:01.000 in

00:56:01.200 the

00:56:01.340 story

00:56:01.720 do

00:56:02.820 you

00:56:02.860 know

00:56:03.020 Zuby

00:56:03.480 famous

00:56:06.140 musician

00:56:08.000 social

00:56:10.160 media

00:56:10.680 personality

00:56:12.740 he's

00:56:13.720 got

00:56:13.860 a lot

00:56:14.120 of

00:56:14.300 he's

00:56:14.660 got

00:56:14.780 a lot

00:56:15.020 of

00:56:15.120 different

00:56:15.340 talents

00:56:15.840 so

00:56:16.040 it's

00:56:16.160 hard

00:56:16.300 to

00:56:16.460 describe

00:56:16.860 him

00:56:17.080 but

00:56:19.300 Zuby

00:56:19.800 famously

00:56:20.660 entered

00:56:21.260 a

00:56:21.640 woman's 0.82

00:56:22.640 weightlifting

00:56:23.220 competition

00:56:23.980 identified

00:56:25.080 as a

00:56:25.700 woman 0.99

00:56:25.960 during

00:56:26.680 the

00:56:26.940 competition

00:56:27.480 and

00:56:27.760 won

00:56:27.940 the

00:56:28.100 competition

00:56:28.620 now

00:56:30.040 that

00:56:30.440 was

00:56:30.700 a

00:56:31.020 story

00:56:31.340 that

00:56:31.540 a lot

00:56:31.760 of

00:56:31.860 people

00:56:32.100 in

00:56:32.360 the

00:56:32.520 right

00:56:33.860 side

00:56:34.200 of

00:56:34.340 the

00:56:34.520 political

00:56:34.900 world

00:56:35.280 have

00:56:35.460 heard

00:56:35.760 and

00:56:37.260 even

00:56:37.640 Zuby

00:56:38.140 when

00:56:38.600 this

00:56:38.780 was

00:56:38.960 first

00:56:39.240 mentioned

00:56:39.680 Zuby

00:56:40.360 posted

00:56:40.860 on

00:56:41.580 social

00:56:42.240 media

00:56:42.580 on

00:56:42.820 X

00:56:43.140 is

00:56:43.820 he

00:56:43.960 talking

00:56:44.240 about

00:56:44.500 me

00:56:44.800 or

00:56:45.320 I

00:56:45.460 think

00:56:45.640 he's

00:56:45.840 talking

00:56:46.060 about

00:56:46.280 me

00:56:46.420 or

00:56:46.540 something

00:56:46.700 like

00:56:46.860 that

00:56:47.060 and

00:56:47.580 I

00:56:47.700 think

00:56:47.880 he

00:56:48.000 was

00:56:48.340 because

00:56:49.360 I

00:56:49.520 think

00:56:49.720 it's

00:56:49.920 the

00:56:50.080 most

00:56:50.380 famous

00:56:50.920 story

00:56:51.360 of

00:56:51.780 somebody

00:56:52.240 entering

00:56:52.760 a

00:56:52.980 woman's 0.82

00:56:53.300 competition

00:56:53.820 as

00:56:54.400 a

00:56:54.520 man

00:56:54.760 and

00:56:54.980 winning

00:56:55.460 so

00:56:56.480 I'm

00:56:56.840 not

00:56:57.000 sure

00:56:57.140 the

00:56:57.300 fact

00:56:57.560 check

00:56:57.760 was

00:56:57.940 right

00:56:58.200 but

00:57:00.000 I'm

00:57:00.360 also

00:57:00.560 not

00:57:00.860 entirely

00:57:01.220 sure

00:57:01.540 what

00:57:05.760 anyway

00:57:05.900 so

00:57:06.260 yes

00:57:06.640 the

00:57:07.020 apparently

00:57:07.940 my

00:57:09.180 idea

00:57:09.660 that

00:57:10.060 Trump

00:57:10.380 is

00:57:10.700 directionally

00:57:11.420 accurate

00:57:11.860 is a

00:57:13.140 little

00:57:13.300 too

00:57:13.580 dangerous

00:57:14.020 for

00:57:14.340 the

00:57:14.500 Democrats

00:57:15.040 to

00:57:15.500 let

00:57:15.760 stay

00:57:16.240 out

00:57:16.460 there

00:57:16.620 without

00:57:16.840 a

00:57:17.040 little

00:57:17.160 push 0.64

00:57:17.440 back

00:57:17.780 so

00:57:18.480 they

00:57:18.600 tried

00:57:18.780 to

00:57:18.920 push 0.64

00:57:19.100 back

00:57:19.400 on

00:57:19.600 it

00:57:19.780 but

00:57:20.640 wasn't

00:57:21.020 much

00:57:21.240 of a

00:57:21.480 push 0.64

00:57:21.800 so

00:57:22.860 I

00:57:23.260 came

00:57:23.480 out

00:57:23.640 okay

00:57:23.900 on

00:57:24.080 that

00:57:24.280 Trump

00:57:26.760 is

00:57:27.120 teasing

00:57:27.740 that

00:57:28.140 Kamala

00:57:28.460 Harris

00:57:28.700 is

00:57:28.900 doing

00:57:29.100 so

00:57:29.360 poorly

00:57:29.720 that

00:57:30.600 the

00:57:30.760 Democrats

00:57:31.220 must

00:57:31.520 be

00:57:31.720 thinking

00:57:32.020 about

00:57:32.520 switching

00:57:33.680 around

00:57:34.100 a few

00:57:34.940 weeks

00:57:35.200 before

00:57:35.760 election

00:57:36.040 I

00:57:36.800 don't

00:57:37.000 think

00:57:37.220 that's

00:57:37.520 going

00:57:37.640 to

00:57:37.720 happen

00:57:38.020 but

00:57:39.460 I'll

00:57:39.600 bet

00:57:39.760 I'm

00:57:39.940 not

00:57:40.200 I

00:57:40.640 wouldn't

00:57:40.860 be

00:57:41.020 surprised

00:57:41.440 if

00:57:41.700 it's

00:57:41.860 been

00:57:42.080 discussed

00:57:43.340 she's

00:57:44.660 doing

00:57:44.900 so

00:57:45.220 poorly

00:57:45.620 really

00:57:45.980 worse

00:57:46.320 than

00:57:46.560 any

00:57:46.860 candidate

00:57:47.240 ever

00:57:48.460 I

00:57:49.580 mean

00:57:49.740 we

00:57:50.200 always

00:57:50.400 make

00:57:50.600 fun

00:57:50.820 of

00:57:50.940 Dukakis 0.98

00:57:51.440 remember

00:57:52.640 when

00:57:53.080 Dukakis 0.98

00:57:53.760 ran

00:57:54.140 and

00:57:54.440 he

00:57:55.120 rode

00:57:55.680 around

00:57:55.940 in a

00:57:56.220 tank

00:57:56.520 and

00:57:56.680 everybody

00:57:56.960 teased

00:57:57.320 him

00:57:57.460 and he

00:57:57.640 lost

00:57:57.960 well

00:57:58.880 Dukakis 0.98

00:57:59.340 was

00:57:59.700 much

00:58:00.260 better

00:58:00.600 than

00:58:02.040 Kamala

00:58:02.400 Harris

00:58:02.740 as a

00:58:03.100 campaigner

00:58:03.700 so

00:58:04.260 she

00:58:04.440 is the 1.00

00:58:04.780 worst

00:58:05.060 campaigner

00:58:05.740 in the

00:58:06.080 history

00:58:06.380 of

00:58:06.560 campaigns

00:58:07.080 as far

00:58:07.440 as I

00:58:07.680 know

00:58:07.880 but

00:58:11.660 I

00:58:12.140 don't

00:58:12.380 think

00:58:12.660 they're

00:58:13.160 going to

00:58:13.360 switch

00:58:13.600 around

00:58:13.860 I

00:58:14.040 think

00:58:14.200 they're

00:58:14.380 going to

00:58:14.480 have to

00:58:14.700 live

00:58:14.900 with

00:58:15.080 what

00:58:15.240 they

00:58:15.360 got

00:58:15.540 here

00:58:15.720 there

00:58:16.700 there

00:58:16.720 are

00:58:16.860 reports

00:58:17.280 that

00:58:17.660 Trump

00:58:18.280 is

00:58:18.500 massively

00:58:19.060 ramping

00:58:19.580 up

00:58:19.740 his

00:58:19.940 security

00:58:20.460 we

00:58:21.000 don't

00:58:21.160 know

00:58:21.300 the

00:58:21.460 details

00:58:21.860 of

00:58:22.060 that

00:58:22.300 but

00:58:23.140 it

00:58:23.300 does

00:58:23.580 seem

00:58:23.980 that

00:58:24.400 the

00:58:25.740 threats

00:58:26.400 against

00:58:26.760 him

00:58:27.080 must

00:58:27.720 have

00:58:27.900 ramped

00:58:28.240 up

00:58:28.440 and

00:58:28.600 maybe

00:58:28.800 the

00:58:29.060 Iranian

00:58:29.420 thing

00:58:29.780 is

00:58:29.940 looking

00:58:30.140 bad

00:58:30.480 there's

00:58:31.320 some

00:58:31.580 indication

00:58:32.300 that

00:58:32.580 maybe

00:58:32.800 he

00:58:33.060 rides

00:58:33.460 a

00:58:34.400 decoy

00:58:34.940 plane

00:58:35.340 sometimes

00:58:35.900 and he's

00:58:36.320 not always

00:58:36.800 in his

00:58:37.160 plane

00:58:37.480 I don't

00:58:37.920 know

00:58:38.020 if

00:58:38.140 that's

00:58:38.360 true

00:58:38.560 but

00:58:39.600 we

00:58:43.300 got to

00:58:43.720 keep

00:58:43.940 him

00:58:44.080 alive

00:58:44.520 people

00:58:45.580 and

00:58:47.340 there

00:58:47.480 are

00:58:47.560 reports

00:58:47.940 that

00:58:48.180 the

00:58:48.440 secret

00:58:48.740 service

00:58:49.260 is

00:58:49.960 not

00:58:50.160 always

00:58:50.400 consistently

00:58:51.120 doing

00:58:51.680 a good

00:58:52.000 job

00:58:52.500 and

00:58:52.760 it's

00:58:55.000 scary

00:58:55.300 stuff

00:58:55.740 so

00:58:56.700 keep

00:58:57.120 him

00:58:57.280 alive

00:58:57.780 according

00:59:01.460 to the

00:59:01.920 Woodward

00:59:02.480 book

00:59:02.920 General

00:59:04.000 Mark

00:59:04.500 Milley

00:59:04.940 is

00:59:05.180 afraid

00:59:05.460 he

00:59:05.640 might

00:59:05.800 be

00:59:06.000 court

00:59:06.300 martialled

00:59:06.720 if

00:59:06.960 Trump

00:59:07.240 wins

00:59:07.800 interestingly

00:59:10.160 Mike

00:59:10.720 Benz

00:59:11.200 who

00:59:11.360 knows

00:59:11.560 more

00:59:11.760 than

00:59:11.900 we

00:59:12.080 do

00:59:12.280 about

00:59:12.620 things

00:59:13.180 has

00:59:14.420 been

00:59:14.580 saying

00:59:14.860 for

00:59:15.040 a

00:59:15.160 long

00:59:15.340 time

00:59:15.660 that

00:59:16.000 eventually

00:59:16.620 the

00:59:16.960 evidence

00:59:17.380 about

00:59:17.700 January

00:59:18.140 6

00:59:18.600 will

00:59:19.300 point

00:59:19.640 to

00:59:19.880 Milley

00:59:20.200 now

00:59:21.120 I don't

00:59:21.340 know

00:59:21.500 exactly

00:59:22.040 what

00:59:22.280 the

00:59:22.440 accusation

00:59:23.040 is

00:59:23.400 but

00:59:24.100 my

00:59:24.300 guess

00:59:24.620 is

00:59:24.920 that

00:59:25.240 it

00:59:25.460 would

00:59:25.560 be

00:59:25.680 something

00:59:26.020 like

00:59:26.520 Mark

00:59:26.960 Milley

00:59:27.320 might

00:59:27.700 have

00:59:28.040 intentionally

00:59:30.080 allowed

00:59:30.780 the

00:59:31.000 situation

00:59:31.520 to get

00:59:31.840 out of

00:59:32.140 hand

00:59:32.440 or

00:59:32.800 worse

00:59:33.300 may

00:59:34.500 have

00:59:34.640 been

00:59:34.820 part

00:59:35.160 of

00:59:35.420 instigating

00:59:36.040 things

00:59:36.480 that

00:59:36.700 made it

00:59:37.040 get

00:59:37.140 on

00:59:37.300 hand

00:59:37.580 now

00:59:37.920 that's

00:59:38.180 not

00:59:38.340 an

00:59:38.460 accusation

00:59:39.320 for

00:59:39.560 me

00:59:39.760 I'm

00:59:40.400 just

00:59:40.580 saying

00:59:40.860 that

00:59:41.160 if

00:59:41.900 it's

00:59:42.120 true

00:59:42.360 and

00:59:42.940 Mike

00:59:43.140 Benz

00:59:43.460 is

00:59:43.620 highly

00:59:44.140 credible

00:59:44.780 and

00:59:45.180 has

00:59:45.640 demonstrated

00:59:46.620 great

00:59:47.040 mastery

00:59:47.480 of

00:59:47.720 the

00:59:47.920 information

00:59:49.680 about

00:59:51.040 all

00:59:51.260 things

00:59:51.540 political

00:59:52.280 it

00:59:52.500 seems

00:59:52.740 but

00:59:53.860 maybe

00:59:55.900 maybe

00:59:57.460 it

00:59:58.820 doesn't

00:59:59.180 feel

00:59:59.420 wrong

00:59:59.820 to

01:00:00.040 me

01:00:00.280 but

01:00:00.820 I

01:00:00.960 also

01:00:01.160 don't

01:00:01.340 have

01:00:01.500 backing

01:00:01.840 for

01:00:02.120 it

01:00:02.260 so

01:00:02.360 I

01:00:02.500 can't

01:00:02.740 say

01:00:02.880 it's

01:00:03.060 true

01:00:03.280 but

01:00:06.200 I

01:00:06.380 will

01:00:06.520 be

01:00:06.660 interested

01:00:07.000 to see

01:00:07.400 if

01:00:07.520 anything

01:00:07.780 about

01:00:08.080 Mark

01:00:08.400 Milley

01:00:08.680 comes

01:00:09.000 out

01:00:09.320 I

01:00:09.820 have

01:00:10.300 long

01:00:10.640 had

01:00:11.060 a

01:00:12.120 feeling

01:00:12.500 about

01:00:12.800 him

01:00:13.100 and

01:00:15.360 my

01:00:15.540 feeling

01:00:15.980 is

01:00:16.360 he

01:00:16.840 doesn't

01:00:17.180 look

01:00:17.380 like

01:00:17.620 he's

01:00:17.920 exactly

01:00:18.400 on

01:00:18.700 my

01:00:18.940 team

01:00:19.280 but

01:00:20.940 it's

01:00:21.220 just

01:00:21.380 a

01:00:21.520 feeling

01:00:21.800 so

01:00:22.620 we'll

01:00:22.840 see

01:00:23.000 if

01:00:23.120 there's

01:00:23.320 anything

01:00:23.640 that

01:00:24.800 would

01:00:25.080 be

01:00:26.380 suspicious

01:00:26.880 about

01:00:27.280 his

01:00:27.500 activities

01:00:27.980 maybe

01:00:28.920 someday

01:00:29.260 we'll

01:00:29.500 know

01:00:29.820 New

01:00:31.420 York

01:00:31.580 Post

01:00:31.840 says

01:00:32.120 the

01:00:32.440 feds

01:00:32.980 have

01:00:33.120 deported

01:00:33.600 some

01:00:33.860 of

01:00:33.960 those

01:00:34.180 ISIS

01:00:34.600 migrants

01:00:35.280 who

01:00:35.560 slipped

01:00:35.840 into

01:00:36.080 the

01:00:36.240 country

01:00:36.560 some

01:00:38.340 would

01:00:38.520 say

01:00:38.720 that

01:00:38.920 most

01:00:39.100 of

01:00:39.220 them

01:00:39.360 have

01:00:39.540 been

01:00:40.040 in

01:00:40.600 prison

01:00:40.900 the

01:00:41.060 whole

01:00:41.200 time

01:00:41.580 so

01:00:41.800 they

01:00:41.940 weren't

01:00:42.140 dangerous

01:00:42.580 but

01:00:42.940 it

01:00:44.060 reminds

01:00:44.440 us

01:00:44.680 once

01:00:44.940 again

01:00:45.220 that

01:00:45.480 we

01:00:45.660 need

01:00:45.920 a

01:00:46.100 secure

01:00:46.420 border

01:00:46.800 not

01:00:47.200 whatever

01:00:47.480 is

01:00:47.640 happening

01:00:47.940 has

01:00:49.860 Israel

01:00:50.260 attacked

01:00:50.780 anybody

01:00:51.460 in the

01:00:51.800 last

01:00:52.040 hour

01:00:52.340 because

01:00:54.520 we're

01:00:54.740 waiting

01:00:55.020 for it

01:00:55.380 this

01:00:55.580 weekend

01:00:55.920 so

01:00:56.340 the

01:00:56.540 smart

01:00:56.780 people

01:00:57.080 are

01:00:57.240 saying

01:00:57.580 probably

01:00:58.540 this

01:00:58.940 weekend

01:00:59.440 Israel

01:01:00.760 is

01:01:00.940 going

01:01:01.140 to

01:01:01.240 do

01:01:01.440 some

01:01:01.700 kind

01:01:01.940 of

01:01:02.060 a

01:01:02.280 response

01:01:03.920 to

01:01:04.200 Iran

01:01:04.620 some

01:01:05.760 say

01:01:06.040 they're

01:01:06.280 not

01:01:06.520 going

01:01:06.700 to

01:01:06.800 attack

01:01:07.040 the

01:01:07.260 nuclear

01:01:07.640 facilities

01:01:08.240 some

01:01:08.680 say

01:01:08.900 they

01:01:09.100 might

01:01:09.460 some

01:01:10.260 say

01:01:10.520 they're

01:01:10.760 going

01:01:10.960 to

01:01:11.080 attack

01:01:11.340 the

01:01:11.720 oil

01:01:13.500 producing

01:01:14.060 facilities

01:01:14.840 they

01:01:17.000 might

01:01:17.440 they

01:01:19.020 might

01:01:19.380 I

01:01:20.760 don't

01:01:20.940 know

01:01:21.100 if

01:01:21.240 they're

01:01:21.400 going

01:01:21.560 to

01:01:21.940 you

01:01:24.080 think

01:01:24.300 they're

01:01:24.500 going

01:01:24.580 to

01:01:24.660 attack

01:01:24.940 Beirut

01:01:25.680 they

01:01:26.920 might

01:01:27.340 I

01:01:31.020 don't

01:01:31.140 know

01:01:31.420 we'll

01:01:32.440 see

01:01:32.740 then

01:01:34.460 there's

01:01:34.780 reports

01:01:35.320 of

01:01:35.540 some

01:01:35.740 kind

01:01:36.040 of

01:01:36.220 some

01:01:38.880 kind

01:01:39.100 of

01:01:39.180 maybe

01:01:39.340 there

01:01:39.560 was

01:01:39.680 a

01:01:39.840 cyber

01:01:40.140 attack

01:01:40.520 already

01:01:40.960 on

01:01:41.580 Iran's 0.89

01:01:42.040 nuclear

01:01:42.420 and

01:01:42.600 military

01:01:42.940 assets

01:01:43.440 I

01:01:43.660 don't

01:01:43.780 know

01:01:43.920 if

01:01:44.020 that's

01:01:44.260 true

01:01:44.520 and

01:01:47.280 what

01:01:47.480 do

01:01:47.560 you

01:01:47.660 think

01:01:47.920 you

01:01:49.680 think

01:01:49.880 it's

01:01:50.120 going

01:01:50.260 to

01:01:50.300 be

01:01:50.440 massive

01:01:50.880 because

01:01:51.600 if

01:01:51.780 it's

01:01:51.920 massive

01:01:52.440 Iran

01:01:53.060 probably

01:01:53.480 will

01:01:53.880 respond

01:01:54.980 if

01:01:56.320 it's

01:01:56.600 a 0.65

01:01:56.820 decapitation 0.98

01:01:57.740 strike

01:01:58.300 which

01:01:59.500 would

01:01:59.680 be

01:01:59.960 gutsy

01:02:00.520 big

01:02:01.500 risk

01:02:01.920 then

01:02:04.840 I

01:02:05.020 don't

01:02:05.160 know

01:02:05.400 how

01:02:05.600 they

01:02:05.780 respond

01:02:06.260 because

01:02:06.540 they

01:02:06.700 would

01:02:06.820 have

01:02:06.980 to

01:02:07.100 figure

01:02:07.280 out

01:02:07.460 who

01:02:07.560 was

01:02:07.680 in

01:02:07.820 charge

01:02:08.200 that

01:02:08.520 could

01:02:08.880 take

01:02:09.100 a

01:02:09.220 while

01:02:09.400 I

01:02:11.420 don't

01:02:11.560 know

01:02:11.880 there

01:02:14.160 might

01:02:14.380 be

01:02:14.520 something

01:02:14.880 lighting

01:02:15.260 up

01:02:15.500 this

01:02:15.740 weekend

01:02:16.080 but

01:02:16.360 we'll

01:02:16.520 find

01:02:16.760 out

01:02:17.040 I'll

01:02:18.260 give

01:02:18.440 you

01:02:18.580 some

01:02:18.840 advice

01:02:19.340 that

01:02:20.260 I

01:02:20.360 would

01:02:20.480 like

01:02:20.660 to

01:02:20.820 give

01:02:21.180 well

01:02:22.040 I'll

01:02:22.740 just

01:02:22.880 give

01:02:23.080 you

01:02:23.180 some

01:02:23.380 advice

01:02:23.760 you're

01:02:27.240 probably

01:02:27.540 feeling

01:02:27.940 more

01:02:28.200 anxious

01:02:28.600 than

01:02:29.160 you

01:02:29.320 have

01:02:29.640 maybe

01:02:31.220 much

01:02:31.560 of

01:02:31.740 your

01:02:31.880 life

01:02:32.240 but

01:02:33.560 a

01:02:33.800 lot

01:02:33.960 of

01:02:34.100 that

01:02:34.300 is

01:02:34.520 that

01:02:34.680 the

01:02:34.860 news

01:02:35.260 is

01:02:35.480 just

01:02:35.700 saturating

01:02:36.300 you

01:02:36.560 with

01:02:36.800 bad

01:02:37.200 news

01:02:37.700 and

01:02:37.900 scary

01:02:38.220 things

01:02:38.740 more

01:02:39.100 than

01:02:39.260 ever

01:02:39.500 so

01:02:40.700 we're

01:02:40.980 probably

01:02:41.280 not

01:02:41.620 in

01:02:41.800 any

01:02:42.000 worse

01:02:42.300 shape

01:02:42.760 survival

01:02:43.740 wise

01:02:44.260 than

01:02:44.660 we've

01:02:44.920 ever

01:02:45.120 been

01:02:45.540 at

01:02:45.880 any

01:02:46.100 time

01:02:46.340 in

01:02:46.460 the

01:02:46.580 country

01:02:46.860 in

01:02:47.440 fact

01:02:47.700 we're

01:02:47.940 probably

01:02:48.360 in

01:02:48.600 better

01:02:48.980 shape

01:02:49.420 risk

01:02:51.060 wise

01:02:51.460 than

01:02:51.740 maybe

01:02:52.580 any

01:02:52.840 time

01:02:53.100 in

01:02:53.220 history

01:02:53.540 now

01:02:54.460 that

01:02:54.620 doesn't

01:02:54.860 mean

01:02:55.020 everything's

01:02:55.520 going

01:02:55.700 to

01:02:55.780 go

01:02:55.940 right

01:02:56.360 but

01:02:57.320 if

01:02:57.440 you're

01:02:57.600 looking

01:02:57.840 at

01:02:58.020 risk

01:02:58.300 reward

01:02:58.780 and

01:02:59.100 compared

01:02:59.440 us

01:02:59.660 right

01:02:59.860 now

01:03:00.100 to

01:03:00.300 any

01:03:00.600 time

01:03:00.880 in

01:03:01.020 American

01:03:01.340 history

01:03:01.760 it'd

01:03:02.940 be

01:03:03.060 okay

01:03:03.420 it's

01:03:04.680 not

01:03:04.860 like

01:03:05.080 everything's

01:03:05.680 falling

01:03:06.040 apart

01:03:06.360 we've

01:03:06.660 had

01:03:06.800 about

01:03:07.120 this

01:03:07.380 many

01:03:07.740 complaints

01:03:08.860 before

01:03:09.400 gotten

01:03:10.320 out of

01:03:10.640 it

01:03:10.880 but

01:03:13.100 you know

01:03:14.500 the

01:03:15.060 thing I

01:03:15.760 would

01:03:15.960 advise

01:03:16.440 is that

01:03:17.720 the odds

01:03:18.360 of your

01:03:18.800 lights

01:03:19.440 and your

01:03:20.480 water

01:03:20.840 being

01:03:21.120 disconnected

01:03:21.800 for much

01:03:22.880 longer than

01:03:23.460 normal

01:03:23.820 are above

01:03:25.680 anything I've

01:03:26.420 ever seen

01:03:26.940 so I would

01:03:29.720 advise you

01:03:30.340 to get a little

01:03:30.920 extra food

01:03:31.720 and water

01:03:32.280 get some

01:03:33.280 batteries

01:03:33.740 get some

01:03:34.320 backup

01:03:34.660 generators

01:03:35.400 talk to your

01:03:37.200 neighbors

01:03:37.560 maybe get a

01:03:38.380 little more

01:03:38.700 organized about

01:03:39.560 who can do

01:03:40.200 what

01:03:40.520 who does

01:03:41.040 what

01:03:41.280 when

01:03:41.580 my

01:03:43.160 understanding

01:03:43.740 is

01:03:44.180 that you

01:03:45.240 can get

01:03:45.760 a

01:03:47.040 Starlink

01:03:49.240 internet

01:03:50.420 device

01:03:51.460 that can

01:03:52.760 be powered

01:03:53.340 just by

01:03:54.080 a small

01:03:54.960 camping

01:03:55.600 generator

01:03:56.200 like one

01:03:57.060 that uses

01:03:57.460 solar

01:03:57.900 so it

01:03:58.800 doesn't

01:03:59.060 use a

01:03:59.380 lot of

01:03:59.600 electricity

01:04:00.080 so I'm

01:04:01.480 thinking of

01:04:02.100 getting one

01:04:02.700 just as a

01:04:03.400 backup

01:04:03.820 Elon Musk

01:04:04.500 actually

01:04:04.900 suggested

01:04:05.460 that

01:04:05.760 it's not

01:04:06.280 a bad

01:04:06.520 idea

01:04:06.800 so it

01:04:07.740 wouldn't

01:04:07.940 be my

01:04:08.300 primary

01:04:08.700 internet

01:04:09.100 but I

01:04:11.240 did buy

01:04:11.900 two

01:04:12.980 solar

01:04:14.220 recharging

01:04:15.160 small

01:04:16.320 generators

01:04:16.840 so I

01:04:17.960 could do

01:04:18.300 small

01:04:18.740 appliances

01:04:19.260 I could

01:04:19.720 run a

01:04:20.100 fan

01:04:20.380 or charge

01:04:21.020 my phone

01:04:21.620 I could

01:04:22.460 keep one

01:04:22.940 refrigerator

01:04:23.400 running

01:04:24.020 but I

01:04:25.800 could also

01:04:26.180 run my

01:04:26.800 Starlink

01:04:27.620 now I

01:04:28.960 might run

01:04:29.420 out of

01:04:29.780 electricity

01:04:30.400 in the

01:04:31.440 evening

01:04:31.720 but then I

01:04:32.380 can recharge

01:04:32.860 it and

01:04:33.380 start over

01:04:33.840 the next

01:04:34.220 day

01:04:34.480 so Amazon

01:04:35.900 had some

01:04:36.480 so I

01:04:37.420 put it

01:04:37.740 in order

01:04:38.160 I'm

01:04:38.900 surprised

01:04:39.280 that they

01:04:39.640 had any

01:04:39.920 left

01:04:40.220 so they

01:04:40.620 haven't

01:04:40.840 actually

01:04:41.140 shipped

01:04:41.500 it

01:04:41.740 I'm not

01:04:42.740 sure if

01:04:43.080 they'll ever

01:04:43.380 be able to

01:04:43.840 ship it

01:04:44.220 because my

01:04:45.260 brain just

01:04:45.840 tells me that

01:04:46.500 there are too

01:04:47.120 many hurricanes

01:04:47.780 going on

01:04:48.360 and that they

01:04:49.480 probably already

01:04:50.380 were bought

01:04:50.860 out

01:04:51.120 but you

01:04:53.560 should all

01:04:54.100 give a little

01:04:54.660 more thought

01:04:55.400 to being able

01:04:57.280 to be

01:04:57.600 self-sufficient

01:04:58.460 at least for a

01:05:00.020 while I

01:05:00.660 can't tell you

01:05:01.240 how long

01:05:01.760 I mean

01:05:02.980 some people

01:05:03.860 are talking

01:05:04.240 about the

01:05:04.620 whole grid

01:05:05.120 being taken

01:05:05.720 out and

01:05:06.300 you know

01:05:06.640 we're

01:05:06.900 powerless for

01:05:07.960 months

01:05:08.380 maybe

01:05:09.920 I would

01:05:11.640 bet against

01:05:12.180 it

01:05:12.400 I think

01:05:12.720 the odds

01:05:13.080 are against

01:05:13.460 that

01:05:13.800 but the

01:05:14.540 odds of

01:05:15.000 losing power

01:05:15.700 for a week

01:05:16.480 are pretty

01:05:17.940 high

01:05:18.320 the odds

01:05:20.440 of losing

01:05:20.900 power

01:05:21.400 where you

01:05:21.920 live

01:05:22.300 for a week

01:05:23.280 just based

01:05:24.640 on either

01:05:25.000 a natural

01:05:25.520 disaster

01:05:26.120 or based

01:05:26.840 on a

01:05:27.340 hack

01:05:27.680 or something

01:05:28.020 like that

01:05:28.360 pretty good

01:05:29.300 the odds

01:05:30.440 of losing

01:05:30.900 your power

01:05:31.520 virtually

01:05:32.920 permanently

01:05:33.520 you know

01:05:34.240 some

01:05:34.500 catastrophic

01:05:35.240 attack

01:05:35.680 to the

01:05:35.940 network

01:05:36.300 low

01:05:37.820 but definitely

01:05:39.420 a possibility

01:05:40.160 but low

01:05:42.120 I heard

01:05:47.780 there were

01:05:48.040 some problems

01:05:48.720 with some

01:05:49.140 of the

01:05:49.380 natural gas

01:05:50.620 generator

01:05:51.200 backups

01:05:51.820 but I don't

01:05:54.060 know what

01:05:54.280 those problems

01:05:54.820 are

01:05:55.140 I'm short

01:06:03.440 of being

01:06:03.880 a prepper

01:06:04.440 but I'm

01:06:07.040 I'm prepper

01:06:08.900 adjacent

01:06:09.480 I'm prepper

01:06:12.420 adjacent

01:06:12.920 I'm right

01:06:14.500 in that

01:06:15.100 general

01:06:16.640 thought

01:06:17.240 category

01:06:17.780 but not

01:06:18.560 quite a

01:06:18.980 prepper

01:06:19.260 12 days

01:06:26.920 yeah

01:06:27.260 a lot

01:06:28.780 of people

01:06:29.120 put in

01:06:29.520 generax

01:06:30.080 well I

01:06:31.320 priced mine

01:06:32.000 it was

01:06:32.260 $100,000

01:06:33.000 so I

01:06:33.560 decided not

01:06:34.100 to do it

01:06:34.660 I might

01:06:36.540 look into

01:06:36.980 it again

01:06:37.340 maybe with

01:06:37.800 a different

01:06:38.140 company

01:06:38.560 all right

01:06:40.700 ladies and 0.98

01:06:41.500 gentlemen

01:06:41.840 that's all

01:06:42.760 for today

01:06:43.200 I'm going

01:06:43.480 to talk

01:06:43.720 to the

01:06:44.000 locals

01:06:44.380 people

01:06:44.740 privately

01:06:45.300 thanks

01:06:45.800 for joining

01:06:46.440 if you're

01:06:46.860 on X

01:06:47.420 and Rumble 0.98

01:06:48.400 and YouTube

01:06:49.940 remember to

01:06:50.640 get the

01:06:50.920 Dilbert calendar

01:06:51.580 you can only

01:06:52.120 get it at

01:06:52.560 Dilbert.com

01:06:53.300 and win

01:06:53.940 bigly

01:06:54.280 my new

01:06:55.020 book

01:06:55.320 my new

01:06:56.900 updated book

01:06:57.680 you see it

01:06:58.180 in the

01:06:58.360 background

01:06:58.720 it's available

01:06:59.520 on Amazon

01:07:00.100 the calendar

01:07:01.180 is not

01:07:01.560 available on

01:07:02.080 Amazon

01:07:02.380 you have to

01:07:03.260 go to

01:07:03.520 Dilbert.com

01:07:04.380 and you can

01:07:04.840 follow the

01:07:05.320 link to

01:07:05.800 purchase it

01:07:06.400 and delivery

01:07:08.700 of the

01:07:09.300 calendar

01:07:09.800 will start

01:07:12.580 in a few

01:07:13.080 weeks I

01:07:13.500 think

01:07:13.740 but we're

01:07:14.540 we're shooting

01:07:15.040 for making

01:07:15.620 sure everybody

01:07:16.180 has them for

01:07:16.760 Christmas

01:07:17.140 and the

01:07:18.600 sooner you

01:07:19.080 get it

01:07:19.500 the sooner

01:07:20.060 you will

01:07:20.580 get it

01:07:20.900 in the

01:07:21.220 cycle

01:07:21.580 sooner you

01:07:22.800 order it

01:07:23.440 all right

01:07:24.060 everybody

01:07:24.580 thanks for

01:07:25.980 joining

01:07:26.520 and locals

01:07:27.540 I'm coming

01:07:28.160 at you

01:07:28.560 privately

01:07:29.160 in 30

01:07:29.860 seconds

01:07:30.480 1

01:07:32.060 2

01:07:33.000 1

01:07:35.760 2

01:07:36.920 2

01:07:37.500 2

01:07:38.060 1

01:07:38.860 2

01:07:41.320 1

01:07:41.940 2

01:07:42.940 3

01:07:43.680 2

01:07:43.760 2

01:07:43.940 2

01:07:44.880 5

01:07:44.940 2

01:07:45.560 3

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 12, 2024

Episode 2626 CWSA 10⧸12⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript