Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 12, 2024


Episode 2626 CWSA 10⧸12⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

139.77066

Word Count

9,471

Sentence Count

247

Misogynist Sentences

22

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, I talk about the possibility that we have infinite energy and what we would do with it if we did have it. I also talk about Elon Musk's new Tesla robot, and whether or not it could be controlled by humans.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 There we go.
00:00:08.080 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:18.680 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm pretty confident that you've never had a better time.
00:00:23.980 But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand
00:00:30.240 with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass,
00:00:35.300 a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:39.180 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:41.100 I like coffee.
00:00:42.600 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,
00:00:46.560 the thing that makes everything better today with extra oxytocin.
00:00:50.820 And it happens now.
00:00:53.980 Oh, so good.
00:01:01.820 Delightful.
00:01:04.240 Well, here are a few things that I've heard on social media in the last few days.
00:01:11.020 The United States has some big facility at the South Pole where we're controlling earthquakes
00:01:19.140 and the weather.
00:01:20.620 Well, I'm not going to say that I'm buying into that one yet.
00:01:28.760 Stop it, Kamala.
00:01:33.720 I don't know how that happens, but the video just started running on its own.
00:01:40.080 Go away.
00:01:41.740 There we go.
00:01:42.460 So I don't believe the South Pole has a major earthquake-making weather-changing facility,
00:01:50.780 but maybe.
00:01:52.920 Maybe that's where they're keeping all the UFOs.
00:01:55.820 I've heard there's something called zero-point energy that we got from the UFOs or the UAPs.
00:02:02.080 So we have infinite energy, and the question is, do you steal it or give it away?
00:02:09.320 And I thought, that's kind of an interesting question, isn't it?
00:02:11.940 Suppose the United States or any one country captured a downed UFO and reverse-engineered its energy-making properties,
00:02:24.240 and then suppose that one country on Earth had the capability of having free unlimited energy.
00:02:32.260 What do you do with it?
00:02:35.560 Well, here's the weird thing.
00:02:37.860 If you think about, well, we'll give it to the world, and then the world will have free energy.
00:02:43.620 I'm not sure we would do that.
00:02:46.340 I'm not even sure we would ever make it available.
00:02:50.000 So I love the fact that, well, I don't think that we've discovered any infinite energy from UFOs.
00:02:56.720 I'm not on that page.
00:02:59.340 It is true that if we did, we wouldn't necessarily ever release it.
00:03:03.720 Because what it would do is it would equalize the power of all the countries in the world.
00:03:08.880 Because suddenly the smallest country in the world would have unlimited energy.
00:03:13.960 If you had unlimited energy, you could end up building, I don't know, particle beam weapons and lasers,
00:03:20.200 and you wouldn't be able to dominate the world as America likes to do.
00:03:25.040 So sure enough, if we had infinite energy and it was free energy, I don't know if we would tell anybody.
00:03:31.520 We might just keep it to ourselves.
00:03:36.740 There are other accounts that the aliens have now been well-discovered,
00:03:41.720 and a whistleblower can guarantee that there's a big government facility looking at all the alien ships,
00:03:48.020 and let's call them UAPs because we don't know if they're from outer space,
00:03:52.000 and that there might be some announcement soon.
00:03:56.000 I do not believe any of that.
00:03:58.380 I do not believe there will be an announcement of any official sightings of UAPs.
00:04:04.180 I do not believe that there are orbs.
00:04:09.960 So the reporting is that the UFOs are orbs, you know,
00:04:13.400 they're like just round glowing things that seem to defy physics.
00:04:19.940 I don't think so.
00:04:21.500 But I could be convinced.
00:04:24.380 So all these things that I've been hearing on social media,
00:04:28.800 I don't believe a single one of them,
00:04:31.540 but I could be convinced.
00:04:34.580 You know, I could imagine some future situation in which there's better information,
00:04:38.820 and suddenly I think, hey, those alien orbs are all over the place.
00:04:44.000 But not yet.
00:04:44.840 So I remember I told you how impressed I was that Elon Musk sent his Tesla robots,
00:04:52.000 the Optimus, to mingle with the crowd at his launch event,
00:04:56.800 and that the robots would just have conversations and mingle and act like people.
00:05:03.040 And then today I saw a video that suggests,
00:05:06.260 and we do know that at least the bartender robots had some human assist.
00:05:12.360 So there were some humans operating them remotely
00:05:15.700 so that they could do maybe a little more than a robot could do.
00:05:20.160 But I think the reality is that maybe all the robots might have had a little remote assist.
00:05:26.800 So I don't think that that event showed you what the robots can do.
00:05:31.620 I think it's showing you what they think they can get the robots to do eventually.
00:05:36.500 I don't know that for sure.
00:05:37.740 But I would be a little cautious that the robots are as advanced as the initial press suggested.
00:05:46.780 In my experience using AI as just a consumer,
00:05:50.640 it did not seem to me that the AI itself would be anywhere near good enough for a robot
00:05:56.380 to act the way the robots were supposed to be acting.
00:05:59.680 So it wouldn't surprise me if there was a little more human remote assistance in those robots
00:06:06.280 than was immediately apparent.
00:06:09.460 So I saw one video of a robot having a conversation at the event,
00:06:13.060 and it was clearly just a person.
00:06:15.940 There was no doubt about the voice coming out of the robot in that clip was a person, not an AI.
00:06:22.980 But the clip itself could have been fake, so I don't know what's going on.
00:06:27.120 So I don't know if the clip was fake or the robots were human-assisted,
00:06:32.760 but I wouldn't believe that they can do all the things that you thought they could believe they could do.
00:06:38.480 Not yet.
00:06:39.020 I think they will.
00:06:41.720 Speaking of Elon Musk, Starship 5 is going to take off in two days.
00:06:47.560 So that's that really big, fat rocket that I don't think has successfully launched yet.
00:06:55.380 But if it does, it's a big, big deal.
00:06:57.820 It's a Starship.
00:06:59.400 And what's fun about it is that when this one lands, if everything worked,
00:07:04.520 there are these two gigantic chopsticks that will hold it when it lands.
00:07:10.860 So it's going to come down like a regular rocket, but apparently it won't be completely stable when it lands.
00:07:18.140 So these giant chopsticks are just going to grab it when it reaches the ground.
00:07:22.920 Do you think that's going to work?
00:07:25.320 I'll tell you, if you told me that rockets were going to, you know,
00:07:28.820 take off and then land so they could be reused,
00:07:33.620 I might have said, I don't know if he could ever do that.
00:07:35.920 And then I hear that you're going to grab the rocket with giant chopsticks.
00:07:40.620 And then I say again, I'm not sure you could do that.
00:07:44.740 I don't know if that can be done.
00:07:46.440 We'll find out in two days.
00:07:47.880 We might find out if it can be done.
00:07:49.620 I wouldn't bet against Musk when it comes to giant mechanical things.
00:07:56.660 Well, Babylon Bee has a parody movie called January 6th, The Most Deadliest Day.
00:08:03.680 The Most Deadliest Day.
00:08:05.160 Because Democrats say January 6th was the most deadliest day,
00:08:09.600 which is, you know, laughably incorrect.
00:08:12.540 So I only saw the trailer for it, but it looks like it's very funny.
00:08:19.600 CBS News was acting ridiculous.
00:08:22.240 They had a headline today that Trump wants to make auto loan interest tax,
00:08:27.240 interest on auto loans tax deductible.
00:08:30.980 Now that part's true.
00:08:32.120 Trump did say, I'll make the interest on auto loans tax deductible.
00:08:40.500 And then CBS News says it would mostly help the rich, experts say.
00:08:45.660 It would mostly help the rich to make a write-off on your car loan.
00:08:53.580 Well, this is awkward.
00:08:58.580 But as an official representative of people who are often called rich,
00:09:03.780 we don't get car loans.
00:09:08.200 Did anybody know that?
00:09:12.520 It comes with being rich.
00:09:17.160 They just sort of pay cash for the car.
00:09:20.120 I mean, I don't know what kind of car you would be rich and still need a loan for.
00:09:24.780 That's sort of like not being rich.
00:09:27.180 Now, to be fair, the car I'm driving, I did have a loan on.
00:09:30.940 Yeah, the BMW SUV that I have, it just happened to be some weird period in my life
00:09:38.940 where I had this, you know, a lot of cash output at the same time,
00:09:43.000 but I wanted a car and I didn't want to wait a week
00:09:45.080 and I didn't want to sell any stock because I liked the stock that I had.
00:09:48.100 So I did get a loan, believe it or not.
00:09:51.400 Now, because I'm rich, as soon as my cash replenished, I paid it off.
00:09:57.220 So, you know, I didn't pay it until completion.
00:10:00.160 It was just sort of a short-term cash flow management thing.
00:10:03.920 Very normal.
00:10:04.860 It had nothing to do with being rich or poor or anything else.
00:10:07.440 It was just a weird coincidence of events that I needed cash at the same time
00:10:12.640 for a bunch of things.
00:10:14.560 But generally speaking, it would be true that rich people pay cash for cars.
00:10:19.800 So CBS, you're being silly.
00:10:24.760 There's a report in the New England Journal of Medicine,
00:10:27.960 John Fleetwood's writing, that Big Pharma apparently paid over a billion dollars
00:10:33.940 to influence medical research between 2020 and 2022,
00:10:39.140 which would be the period of the pandemic.
00:10:42.920 But they tried to influence the medical research in BMJ, JAMA, and the Lancet.
00:10:48.940 Those are the big ones.
00:10:49.800 It said 59% of journal reviewers, so these would be the people reviewing the studies
00:10:57.120 to say that they're passing peer review or not,
00:11:01.240 that 59% of them received Pharma payments, revealing massive conflicts of interest.
00:11:09.700 So you trust that science, knowing that 59% of the people reviewing the science
00:11:21.780 are being paid by people who would kind of like that science to go their way.
00:11:26.840 So you should not be surprised that science is in the state of total lack of credibility when there's a good reason for that.
00:11:38.800 Apparently, science is pretty much bribed and ruined like everything else.
00:11:42.860 So you've heard that there's a big argument about voter ID.
00:11:58.260 Democrats say, we don't need no voter ID.
00:12:01.240 It's just causing people to not be able to vote.
00:12:04.000 And Republicans are saying, if you don't have voter ID, then all the people who are not allowed to vote are going to vote,
00:12:10.820 and the election will be different.
00:12:13.000 Well, there is one study from 2019 that allegedly found that strict ID requirements have no effect on fraud.
00:12:21.740 That if you have strict ID requirements, you get basically the same result as if you don't have any requirements at all on fraud.
00:12:33.960 Does that sound even slightly true to you?
00:12:39.580 I don't know.
00:12:40.640 That looks like the sort of study that may have gone through the 59% of journal reviewers
00:12:46.980 who were tainted by the pharma industry payments.
00:12:51.880 In this case, it has nothing to do with pharma, but kind of wonder who reviewed this study, don't you?
00:12:59.380 Who reviewed that study?
00:13:01.400 I'm going to say that it might not matter if you have strict ID requirements
00:13:06.860 if the environment is that people are not talking about ID requirements.
00:13:12.580 If nobody is talking about ID requirements, I completely understand why it wouldn't be much of an issue.
00:13:20.260 Because people who didn't have ID would think that they needed it, so they'd stay home.
00:13:25.200 And that would be the end of the story.
00:13:27.800 Everybody would just assume they needed ID if they were going to vote.
00:13:31.700 So if they didn't have it, they'd just stay home and they'd never bring it up.
00:13:36.060 And nobody would even think there was any difference.
00:13:38.480 But what if there's a gigantic national conversation about voter ID
00:13:45.180 combined with a massive influx of people who don't have ID
00:13:49.720 because they're coming from other countries?
00:13:51.960 Do you think you can use your 2019 study that's probably bullshit in the first place
00:13:56.760 to find out what will happen in a completely different fucking situation?
00:14:03.760 Science.
00:14:04.780 I'm glad we've got this science to tell us what's true.
00:14:07.380 So I'm not going to believe that one.
00:14:11.540 The propaganda network, sometimes called MSNBC.
00:14:14.920 I can't call it a news network anymore.
00:14:17.160 It's just so ridiculously over-the-top propaganda at this point
00:14:20.920 that to imagine it's like a news platform, it's just so far from news.
00:14:28.080 It's not even close.
00:14:29.220 But Chris Hayes is telling us that Trump is signaling he's not going to accept a defeat in 2020.
00:14:38.760 Here's how I interpret that.
00:14:40.340 If the propaganda network tells you Trump is signaling he won't accept the election results,
00:14:45.440 what I hear, what I hear is a secret dog whistle from MSNBC telling us that they're going to definitely rig the election
00:14:55.460 and they want to prime you in advance that anybody who would question this upcoming election
00:15:00.320 is some kind of a crazy, fascist, Nazi, possibly.
00:15:06.040 The, yeah, I'm hearing the dog whistle.
00:15:12.320 The dog whistle says we're totally going to cheat, so we want to make sure in advance
00:15:17.040 that if anybody is going to question the election, that we'll discredit them before they even try.
00:15:23.080 I mean, people, who is going to question an election in the United States except bad people?
00:15:29.480 Only bad people are going to question an election, unless it's the Democrats,
00:15:34.080 in which case they've got a really good argument.
00:15:36.940 But when the Republicans do it, bad people, just bad people.
00:15:44.420 Yeah, anyway, that's not a good look.
00:15:48.460 Barack Obama is still getting some backlash for telling black men
00:15:53.740 that maybe they're just a little too worried about having a woman president
00:15:57.680 and therefore are not supporting Kamala Harris as much as maybe they should.
00:16:05.040 And I'm not too interested in it.
00:16:09.300 I'm sort of interested that there's a backlash from both the left and the right to it.
00:16:15.280 The right just sort of makes fun of it.
00:16:17.640 But the left, I've seen a number of people saying,
00:16:20.880 why is Barack Obama insulting my people?
00:16:24.600 Why is he insulting black men?
00:16:32.160 Have you noticed that when people don't do what Democrats want,
00:16:37.100 they don't tell that it's not so much the reasons why they should do something different.
00:16:41.500 It's like, you suck.
00:16:43.500 Everybody's a racist or a fascist if they don't do exactly what a Democrat wants them to do.
00:16:47.920 How about sometimes you'd make an argument?
00:16:51.680 No, you're just a bunch of sexists, according to Barack Obama.
00:16:58.160 So, but here's something I wondered.
00:17:02.960 If it's sexist, and it could be, by the way.
00:17:07.160 I have heard some black men on social media say that they wouldn't vote for a woman as a leader.
00:17:13.280 However, the people who say that, that I saw on social media,
00:17:18.920 gives that strong indication that they weren't going to vote anyway.
00:17:23.860 They didn't exactly look like regular voters, the one who said they wouldn't vote for a woman.
00:17:30.100 But I wondered, would they have voted for Hillary Clinton?
00:17:34.040 Because we would know that, right?
00:17:35.740 Because she ran.
00:17:36.480 Well, Clinton got 88% of the black vote in 2016.
00:17:42.620 How do you get 88% of the black vote unless black men are massively voting for you?
00:17:49.020 Am I wrong?
00:17:51.260 I mean, let's say you even got, I don't know, 98% of the women voting for you, the black women.
00:18:00.080 You'd still have a whole bunch of black men voting to get up to 88% of black voters are for Hillary.
00:18:08.720 So, I don't know how much it showed up when Clinton was running, because as I've often said,
00:18:15.400 you can come up with, you know, plenty of criticisms for Hillary Clinton,
00:18:19.800 but among the criticisms would not be included the following.
00:18:24.380 She's stupid.
00:18:25.840 Nope.
00:18:26.880 Nope.
00:18:27.580 Say what you will about Hillary Clinton, and I say plenty.
00:18:30.640 She's not stupid.
00:18:32.280 She's very, very smart.
00:18:36.060 So, if you're a black man, and you see that she's been a senator,
00:18:40.580 she's been the State Department person, she's been in the White House,
00:18:44.860 do you think that black men would look at Hillary Clinton and say,
00:18:48.720 oh, there's someone who could never be a commander-in-chief?
00:18:53.260 I deeply hate Hillary Clinton, but she absolutely could have been a commander-in-chief.
00:19:00.740 And I'm not going to say that about everybody, because I don't think it's true for Kamala Harris.
00:19:05.340 But I think it depends who the woman is.
00:19:08.560 I think that this whole idea that misogyny is involved, but just with Kamala Harris,
00:19:16.440 I think that has more to do with her.
00:19:19.340 Although I wouldn't be surprised if the way people interpret it in their own minds is,
00:19:24.280 I'm not sure I'm comfortable with a woman as a leader.
00:19:27.620 I think they were pretty comfortable when Hillary Clinton was running.
00:19:31.820 Even I would be.
00:19:32.700 I mean, even I would be comfortable with her in charge, you know, if I trusted at least her mission.
00:19:40.340 She has at least the capability, full capability.
00:19:44.540 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners,
00:19:48.680 I started wondering, is every fabulous item I see from Winners?
00:19:53.240 Like that woman over there with the designer jeans.
00:19:56.160 Are those from Winners?
00:19:57.720 Ooh, are those beautiful gold earrings.
00:20:00.180 Did she pay full price?
00:20:01.240 Or that leather tote?
00:20:02.520 Or that cashmere sweater?
00:20:03.700 Or those knee-high boots?
00:20:05.200 That dress?
00:20:05.980 That jacket?
00:20:06.660 Those shoes?
00:20:07.680 Is anyone paying full price for anything?
00:20:10.620 Stop wondering.
00:20:11.900 Start winning.
00:20:12.840 Winners.
00:20:13.420 Find fabulous for less.
00:20:16.080 All right, but here's the thing that sticks out for me.
00:20:19.280 I haven't heard anybody talk about it.
00:20:20.780 How did it suddenly become socially acceptable and socially safe for both black men and black women to say in public and on video and on social media that they have a complete support for Trump?
00:20:37.080 This is new.
00:20:39.140 This is new, right?
00:20:41.360 Now, I'm not saying that there were not any black supporters of Trump before, because of course there were.
00:20:48.100 But I don't feel like they felt safe saying it out loud in public, like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm totally, I'm Trump all day long.
00:20:57.060 And I've seen video after video of young people, older people, a whole bunch of different ages, but black voters, usually on the street, sometimes in small groups, and they're just saying, oh, yeah, Trump, Trump, Trump all day.
00:21:12.800 Now, they're not all saying Trump.
00:21:14.880 There are others who are voting for Harris, et cetera.
00:21:16.600 But this is completely different.
00:21:20.480 And here's my speculation.
00:21:23.120 I don't believe that you would see so many people, so many black American voters supporting Trump vocally and in public and with no sense of embarrassment about it, no sense of, oh, I hate to tell you this, but just saying it.
00:21:40.220 It's not like I have to hedge it.
00:21:42.080 I have to say, well, he's bad in these ways, but all over, you know, if you weigh everything, I think I slightly support him.
00:21:51.080 You know, that's what white people say.
00:21:53.020 That's how white people talk.
00:21:54.960 You know, all this nuance.
00:21:57.060 Well, you know, I don't like everything about him, but he's better than the alternative.
00:22:02.440 And you see the black American voters are just, oh, yeah, Trump all day long.
00:22:06.000 It's not even close.
00:22:07.900 So here's what I think.
00:22:09.140 I think you couldn't possibly see so many black American voters be completely comfortable to give a non-nuanced, full-throated, yes, Trump in public unless, unless the private conversations look the same.
00:22:31.000 And maybe more, because I don't know what percentage of black Americans privately saying Trump might be the answer is sufficient for anybody to say, oh, I could just say that in public now.
00:22:46.320 And I couldn't say it in public before, but I can do it now.
00:22:49.840 Something big has changed, and I think it's not just the public statements.
00:22:56.220 I think that, you know, I think that at home, the conversation is completely different.
00:23:01.740 Glenn Youngkin points out, it's only, you know, 30 days till the election.
00:23:10.960 And I guess the Biden-Harris Department of Justice, they're filing a lawsuit against Virginia, the Commonwealth, for enforcing a law to remove non-citizens from the voting rolls.
00:23:23.700 So Virginia followed its own law, it's a law that says they have to do it, and they cleaned up their voting rolls so that it's only people who should be allowed to vote are on the list of people who should be allowed to vote.
00:23:38.900 Now, what would be the problem of improving your list of voters so that it doesn't include people who shouldn't vote?
00:23:51.100 Well, according to the Biden-Harris Department of Justice, they're getting sued for doing that.
00:23:59.600 And here's the question I would ask.
00:24:01.620 Since the argument against it has something to do with disenfranchising voters, can you show me that person?
00:24:11.000 Can you just find one?
00:24:14.320 One would be fine.
00:24:15.960 You know, normally I would ask for a scientific poll to make sure that there's really a problem here that needs to be addressed.
00:24:24.260 The problem being that if you get rid of all the voters who are dead and not in the state and should not be voting, that it would somehow suppress the votes of people who are completely allowed to vote.
00:24:37.880 So somehow preventing people who are not allowed to vote from voting would have some kind of an impact on people who are allowed to vote.
00:24:49.460 So can we get an interview with that person who would not vote because Virginia cleaned up his voting rolls?
00:25:00.760 Just one.
00:25:01.840 Again, I don't need a gold standard controlled trial.
00:25:07.360 Well, just show me, just show me that one, just one voter who said I was totally going to vote until Virginia cleaned up his voting rolls.
00:25:19.340 And now I don't know what to do.
00:25:21.480 Can I vote?
00:25:23.120 I mean, I'm totally a legal voter and I've always been a legal voter and I live in the state and I'm an American citizen and I've got ID.
00:25:31.920 But now that Virginia got rid of the people who are not legal voters, I don't know if I can vote anymore.
00:25:40.400 Let's have a talk with that guy because that guy sounds kind of fun.
00:25:45.140 I think I'd like to see that crazy old bastard explain exactly why he can't vote this time because the people who have nothing to do with him can't vote.
00:25:55.100 Just one.
00:25:56.800 Just one.
00:25:58.260 Just one interview.
00:26:00.160 And I'll be on your side.
00:26:01.400 Democrats, you can win me over with just one.
00:26:05.800 One data point.
00:26:07.320 That's all I'm asking for.
00:26:08.700 Just one.
00:26:12.280 Anyway, we're going to play a game that I call drunk or stupid.
00:26:19.780 I'm going to play a video of Kamala Harris at a recent event and I'd like you to judge drunk or stupid.
00:26:28.000 One moment, please.
00:26:29.320 One moment, please.
00:26:40.280 Oh, it's not working.
00:26:45.000 Let me see if I can make it work.
00:26:46.440 Can you hear that?
00:26:56.640 My technology is failing me.
00:27:09.200 Drunk or stupid?
00:27:09.940 No.
00:27:16.440 all right well you'd have to see it and I did test this I'm in the rumble studio
00:27:39.960 oh you got no sound not on locals hmm darn it all right sorry about that but the the the technology
00:27:52.320 does do this and I did test it before we went live but it just stopped working in the middle
00:27:58.220 so that's not cool that's not cool anyway so if you'd seen it boy would we be having a good time
00:28:09.260 now we're not now I'm just all pissed off but if I were not pissed off and you had seen that
00:28:17.480 my goodness we'd be having a good time now instead of this whiny fucked up attitude that I have
00:28:25.000 because this fucking thing didn't work when I wanted it to but boy would we be having fun if it
00:28:30.960 did no she's at um I'll just give you my opinion in my opinion she's obviously drunk
00:28:37.580 and it's just funny that we're pretending like we don't see it
00:28:42.400 uh you can see you can see it on my uh x feed if you want to see it
00:28:48.700 anyway while she was acting stupid and drunk in public uh Tim Walsh was talking to Michael Strayon
00:28:56.460 and if you want to see a car wreck of an interview you should see that now it turns out that every
00:29:04.920 single day now now that both Walsh and Harris are doing more public stuff it really is just the news
00:29:12.320 about them completely blowing so to speak some public event and I've never seen an easier campaign
00:29:24.300 where the other side just has to show the actual event with no commentary and just have
00:29:30.880 Donald Trump I approve this message he's actually doing that now and it's freaking amazing he literally
00:29:38.360 just ran a campaign where it was nothing but her exact words he added no commentary whatsoever
00:29:43.980 and then at the end he just said I approve this message that's baller if you could just show them
00:29:51.500 in their own words and not add a single thing and just say here's my campaign ad look what look at this
00:29:57.980 that's great yeah so the Tim Walsh thing was a total train wreck as well
00:30:02.680 one of the questions was I guess he had at one point
00:30:06.660 said he wanted to get rid of the electoral college but the campaign
00:30:10.540 is not on that so Strayon asked him
00:30:13.800 well you said you wanted to get rid of the electoral college
00:30:17.720 but what do you say now because Conley Harris does not want to
00:30:21.680 and he did the well you know why I said a thing but the campaign is very clear
00:30:26.340 very clear uh we're not going to do that
00:30:29.240 okay
00:30:31.280 bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package
00:30:38.540 learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages conditions apply
00:30:43.720 Scotiabank you're richer than you think
00:30:46.600 all right so J.D. Vance was being grilled by a New York Times reporter
00:30:53.000 and the New York Times reporter was trying desperately to get him on video
00:30:58.200 to say that he wouldn't accept uh the results of the next election
00:31:03.280 because that would make sure that you knew that maybe they hadn't didn't accept the last one and
00:31:08.660 and maybe that's just who they are and maybe that's just proof that Trump is a fascist
00:31:13.000 so
00:31:14.800 she tries with the question asking Vance uh you know did Trump lose the 2020 election
00:31:21.660 and Vance went into a story about how uh the uh FBI convinced the technology platforms to lie
00:31:32.260 about the Hunter laptop and that there is science that supports the fact that it changed the outcome
00:31:38.300 of the vote in a pretty measurable way and then of course she didn't like that
00:31:44.600 because that was something that's sort of outside of the vote counting world
00:31:48.580 so she wanted to limit it to the you know is the vote rigged or not
00:31:52.560 and then once again J.D. used her question
00:31:56.760 as an excuse to talk about not what she wanted to talk about
00:32:00.720 which is vote counting rigging but talking about rigging in a larger sense
00:32:05.420 because the social media platforms and our information
00:32:08.620 network were clearly rigged in a way intended to change the election
00:32:13.340 and it was done by people within the government
00:32:16.120 and then she didn't like that
00:32:19.200 so she tried to ask him a third time
00:32:21.260 and then J.D. for a third time
00:32:23.980 used the time
00:32:25.240 to describe how
00:32:27.220 the election had been totally rigged
00:32:30.100 outside of the vote counting part
00:32:31.800 totally rigged by the information
00:32:33.780 you know bad behavior
00:32:35.860 by our government
00:32:37.180 then she tried for the
00:32:39.220 fourth time
00:32:40.540 to get him to say something about
00:32:42.960 the upcoming elections
00:32:44.280 and
00:32:46.520 he asked if
00:32:48.080 he'd commit to a peaceful transfer of power
00:32:50.980 now J.D. Vance being one of the more gifted
00:32:54.080 communicators
00:32:56.100 did the following
00:32:57.840 which I
00:32:58.580 if you want to see perfect form
00:33:01.340 this is it
00:33:02.880 so the question is
00:33:04.300 would he commit to a peaceful transfer of power
00:33:06.700 what's the first thing you say
00:33:08.900 when asked
00:33:10.240 would you commit to a peaceful transfer of power
00:33:13.480 what's the first thing to say
00:33:15.560 every time
00:33:16.300 yes
00:33:18.520 okay
00:33:19.560 if you don't say yes to that question
00:33:21.520 and you start explaining
00:33:23.560 or giving some background
00:33:24.900 or
00:33:25.380 well you need to know the context
00:33:27.540 oh you fucked up
00:33:29.160 that
00:33:31.300 the question is
00:33:33.160 you know
00:33:33.840 will you accept
00:33:34.800 a
00:33:35.300 you know
00:33:35.740 will you do a
00:33:36.620 peaceful transfer
00:33:37.800 you say yes to that
00:33:39.860 you
00:33:40.820 you give that a hard yes
00:33:42.380 and then you talk about it
00:33:44.540 you don't talk about it first
00:33:46.700 and then get to
00:33:47.760 something like a yes
00:33:49.260 no no no
00:33:50.900 you say yes
00:33:51.740 hard yes
00:33:52.440 unambiguous
00:33:53.580 yes
00:33:54.300 and then you talk about
00:33:55.960 stuff
00:33:56.600 for example
00:33:58.560 he said
00:34:02.760 of course it will be peaceful
00:34:05.600 and then he said
00:34:06.620 because he expects Trump to win
00:34:08.420 perfect
00:34:09.760 perfect
00:34:10.900 and
00:34:12.300 but of course
00:34:13.260 you know
00:34:13.640 he wasn't saying
00:34:14.800 it would only be peaceful
00:34:16.040 if Trump wins
00:34:17.080 he was just
00:34:18.180 you know
00:34:18.460 projecting that he thinks he will
00:34:19.660 but then he said
00:34:21.540 and I quote
00:34:22.440 but
00:34:23.420 if there are problems
00:34:25.220 of course
00:34:26.300 in the same way
00:34:27.320 Democrats protested
00:34:28.660 in 2004
00:34:29.520 and Trump raised
00:34:31.080 in 2020
00:34:31.740 we will make sure
00:34:33.540 every ballot is counted
00:34:34.760 there we go
00:34:36.260 there we go
00:34:38.100 if there are problems
00:34:41.360 he almost got there
00:34:44.180 this is
00:34:45.940 very close
00:34:47.460 to a perfect answer
00:34:48.940 but it's short
00:34:49.760 so I'm gonna
00:34:51.000 I'm gonna criticize it
00:34:52.300 at the same time
00:34:53.600 I'm gonna say
00:34:54.240 it's the best I've seen
00:34:55.800 nobody's been closer
00:34:58.280 to getting this perfect
00:34:59.380 he got really close
00:35:01.420 but
00:35:02.780 that last 10%
00:35:04.440 that he fell short
00:35:05.960 on this answer
00:35:06.720 is the 10%
00:35:08.440 between a landslide victory
00:35:10.360 and making no difference
00:35:11.660 at all
00:35:12.000 it's just so close
00:35:14.160 and here
00:35:15.020 here's the difference
00:35:16.120 between landslide victory
00:35:17.740 and making no difference
00:35:20.220 at all
00:35:20.620 he should have gone
00:35:24.080 on offense
00:35:24.660 so he was
00:35:27.000 completely on defense
00:35:28.060 and boy
00:35:29.220 did he do a good job
00:35:30.200 on defense
00:35:30.900 boy
00:35:32.060 if you were gonna say
00:35:33.100 did he defend himself
00:35:34.400 well
00:35:34.820 yeah
00:35:35.700 yeah
00:35:36.860 great
00:35:37.640 good
00:35:38.720 good defense
00:35:39.680 except
00:35:41.080 the Democrats
00:35:43.320 when they ask the questions
00:35:44.400 this way
00:35:45.120 are exposing
00:35:46.860 their soft underbelly
00:35:48.380 meaning
00:35:49.680 that they're providing
00:35:51.020 a kill shot
00:35:52.100 if you wanted
00:35:53.540 to go on offense
00:35:54.460 he came close
00:35:56.140 to offense
00:35:56.760 he came close
00:35:58.180 when he
00:35:58.640 when he took it
00:35:59.280 out of the domain
00:35:59.980 of counting the votes
00:36:01.060 and it's the domain
00:36:02.460 of the
00:36:02.880 the information manipulation
00:36:04.340 by the press
00:36:05.240 but it's gonna feel
00:36:06.760 to the public
00:36:07.360 like a little bit
00:36:08.120 of a weaselly
00:36:09.160 avoidance of the question
00:36:10.640 because he
00:36:11.780 he wanted to avoid
00:36:12.640 the vote counting issue
00:36:13.880 and go to
00:36:14.560 another issue
00:36:15.340 that he could make hay with
00:36:16.520 good defense
00:36:17.780 good defense
00:36:19.640 here's what offense
00:36:21.940 looks like
00:36:22.720 Mr. Vance
00:36:25.200 uh
00:36:25.600 where are you willing
00:36:27.560 to accept the
00:36:28.520 uh the outcome
00:36:29.300 of the election
00:36:29.960 and have a peaceful
00:36:31.120 transfer
00:36:31.680 um
00:36:33.640 before I answer
00:36:34.880 uh
00:36:35.940 I think for the benefit
00:36:36.760 of the audience
00:36:37.340 we'll need some
00:36:38.040 clarification
00:36:38.520 what are you talking
00:36:40.460 about
00:36:40.720 well
00:36:41.820 are you talking
00:36:42.440 about an election
00:36:43.120 that looks
00:36:43.940 to all observers
00:36:45.120 like it looks
00:36:46.280 clean
00:36:46.820 well I'm asking you
00:36:50.340 will you accept
00:36:50.920 the election
00:36:51.320 I know
00:36:51.720 but
00:36:51.980 one could imagine
00:36:53.560 there could be
00:36:54.060 an election
00:36:54.500 where even
00:36:55.540 objective observers
00:36:56.720 think
00:36:57.120 oh that's very
00:36:57.860 non-standard
00:36:58.860 so I'm asking you
00:37:01.060 just so I answer
00:37:01.800 your question
00:37:02.920 correctly
00:37:03.460 are you saying
00:37:04.580 if the election
00:37:05.260 looks like
00:37:06.680 something's deeply
00:37:07.540 wrong with it
00:37:08.640 will I accept it
00:37:09.660 is that your question
00:37:10.680 oh no
00:37:12.240 no
00:37:12.520 uh
00:37:12.860 if it's like
00:37:13.960 uh
00:37:14.340 if it's like
00:37:15.140 2020
00:37:15.540 oh
00:37:16.780 well you know
00:37:17.280 2020
00:37:17.680 was very different
00:37:19.800 from a lot of
00:37:20.620 projections
00:37:21.120 and there were
00:37:22.240 a lot of
00:37:22.560 bellwether states
00:37:23.640 that didn't go
00:37:24.560 in the direction
00:37:25.740 anybody had ever
00:37:26.460 seen before
00:37:27.140 is that
00:37:28.780 is that what
00:37:29.420 you're talking
00:37:29.800 about
00:37:30.080 are you saying
00:37:31.060 that if the
00:37:31.520 next election
00:37:32.380 also violates
00:37:34.100 a lot of
00:37:34.640 expectations
00:37:35.380 and bellwethers
00:37:36.380 and looks
00:37:37.200 very non-standard
00:37:38.380 compared to
00:37:38.940 what we would
00:37:39.440 expect
00:37:39.840 is that the
00:37:40.720 situation
00:37:41.160 you're asking
00:37:41.680 about
00:37:42.000 it's a kill
00:37:44.840 shot
00:37:45.240 you could make
00:37:46.460 the questioner
00:37:47.520 just melt
00:37:49.340 you
00:37:50.860 you're
00:37:51.540 you're
00:37:51.840 making
00:37:52.180 you're trying
00:37:52.680 to make me
00:37:53.120 think past
00:37:53.760 the sale
00:37:54.260 the sale
00:37:55.900 that you're
00:37:56.460 trying to
00:37:56.800 make
00:37:57.160 is that
00:37:57.660 the election
00:37:58.080 looks perfect
00:37:58.920 in every
00:37:59.740 way
00:38:00.020 if the
00:38:01.240 election
00:38:01.540 looks perfect
00:38:02.240 in every
00:38:02.660 way
00:38:02.940 i can
00:38:03.420 commit
00:38:03.800 100%
00:38:05.000 we're going
00:38:05.520 to accept
00:38:05.900 it
00:38:06.140 there will
00:38:06.820 be a
00:38:07.160 peaceful
00:38:07.460 transfer
00:38:07.980 of power
00:38:08.440 and the
00:38:08.800 people
00:38:09.060 will have
00:38:09.480 spoken
00:38:09.800 is that
00:38:11.220 what you're
00:38:11.460 talking about
00:38:11.980 one that
00:38:12.640 doesn't have
00:38:13.080 any problems
00:38:13.760 and there
00:38:14.120 are no
00:38:14.320 questions
00:38:14.740 when you
00:38:15.120 look at
00:38:15.540 it
00:38:15.700 and even
00:38:16.360 the
00:38:16.560 republicans
00:38:17.240 and even
00:38:18.240 the most
00:38:18.720 ardent
00:38:20.480 democrats
00:38:21.120 could look
00:38:21.580 at it
00:38:21.900 and say
00:38:22.180 yeah that
00:38:22.560 looks fair
00:38:23.060 i don't
00:38:24.160 see any
00:38:24.500 problems
00:38:24.800 with that
00:38:25.140 somebody
00:38:29.460 just lost
00:38:30.060 the
00:38:30.400 did you
00:38:32.160 really lose
00:38:32.620 the sound
00:38:33.080 i can't
00:38:36.160 tell if
00:38:36.440 i'm being
00:38:36.720 pranked
00:38:37.700 hey paul
00:38:39.420 are you
00:38:39.680 still there
00:38:40.120 i need
00:38:42.540 a
00:38:42.780 i need
00:38:43.500 a sound
00:38:43.860 check
00:38:44.120 paul
00:38:44.460 i have
00:38:46.560 to ask
00:38:46.840 somebody
00:38:47.200 i can
00:38:47.560 trust
00:38:47.940 on the
00:38:48.520 networks
00:38:49.380 i'm getting
00:38:51.880 pranked
00:38:52.360 in the
00:38:52.580 comments
00:38:53.000 there's
00:38:55.420 no problem
00:38:55.820 with the
00:38:56.060 sound
00:38:56.320 right
00:38:56.560 all right
00:38:57.680 good
00:38:57.960 so that's
00:39:01.480 the thing
00:39:01.860 if
00:39:02.680 if anybody
00:39:03.840 asked
00:39:04.300 vance
00:39:04.940 or trump
00:39:05.460 that question
00:39:06.180 or any
00:39:06.740 of their
00:39:07.000 pundits
00:39:07.480 the person
00:39:09.000 before answering
00:39:09.900 you have
00:39:10.700 to say
00:39:11.220 i need a
00:39:13.260 clarification
00:39:13.680 on your
00:39:14.180 question
00:39:14.540 do you
00:39:15.420 mean if
00:39:15.760 it looks
00:39:16.180 like it's
00:39:16.640 fraudulent
00:39:17.240 or do you
00:39:17.940 mean if
00:39:18.200 it looks
00:39:18.480 perfect
00:39:18.960 it's a
00:39:22.040 kill shot
00:39:22.540 it's the
00:39:23.640 end of
00:39:23.980 that question
00:39:24.520 and it's
00:39:25.780 their biggest
00:39:26.320 it's their
00:39:26.820 biggest issue
00:39:27.600 that he
00:39:28.640 won't you
00:39:29.200 know he'll
00:39:29.620 stay in
00:39:30.220 office
00:39:30.600 but nobody
00:39:32.380 would be
00:39:33.080 able to get
00:39:33.480 past that
00:39:33.980 question
00:39:34.380 it's a
00:39:35.480 kill shot
00:39:35.920 there aren't
00:39:37.140 very many
00:39:37.620 kill shots
00:39:38.220 that are
00:39:38.520 this clean
00:39:39.200 this is a
00:39:40.740 clean kill
00:39:41.480 shot
00:39:41.880 and it
00:39:42.660 keeps being
00:39:43.780 presented
00:39:44.240 over and
00:39:45.160 over again
00:39:45.780 and nobody
00:39:46.660 takes the
00:39:47.180 shot
00:39:47.540 and i'm not
00:39:49.000 exactly sure
00:39:49.880 what's going
00:39:50.300 on there
00:39:50.760 but take
00:39:52.000 the shot
00:39:52.520 take the
00:39:53.580 shot next
00:39:54.040 time
00:39:54.320 jd i think
00:39:55.340 you could end
00:39:55.820 this thing
00:39:56.240 claudia was
00:39:57.600 leaving for her
00:39:58.200 pickleball
00:39:58.600 tournament
00:39:59.000 i've been
00:39:59.400 visualizing my
00:40:00.200 match all
00:40:00.860 week
00:40:01.320 she was so
00:40:02.260 focused on
00:40:02.760 visualizing that
00:40:03.640 she didn't see
00:40:04.240 the column behind
00:40:04.900 her car on
00:40:05.680 her backhand
00:40:06.220 side
00:40:06.640 good thing
00:40:08.360 claudia's
00:40:08.800 with intact
00:40:09.400 the insurer
00:40:10.160 with the
00:40:10.580 largest network
00:40:11.280 of auto
00:40:11.660 service centers
00:40:12.260 in the country
00:40:13.040 everything was
00:40:13.900 taken care of
00:40:14.540 under one roof
00:40:15.300 and she was
00:40:15.820 on her way
00:40:16.220 in a rental
00:40:16.640 car in no
00:40:17.380 time
00:40:17.700 i made it
00:40:18.440 to my
00:40:18.740 tournament
00:40:19.180 and lost
00:40:20.260 in the first
00:40:20.660 round
00:40:21.040 but you got
00:40:22.120 there on time
00:40:22.820 intact insurance
00:40:23.960 your auto
00:40:24.700 service ace
00:40:25.420 certain conditions
00:40:26.320 apply
00:40:26.700 anyway
00:40:29.040 have you seen
00:40:30.720 the ads
00:40:31.240 men for
00:40:32.180 harris
00:40:32.860 the men
00:40:33.760 who say
00:40:34.220 they're
00:40:35.100 supporting
00:40:35.600 harris
00:40:36.040 there's a
00:40:36.880 new campaign
00:40:37.480 ad from
00:40:38.020 that group
00:40:38.700 and
00:40:39.740 so it
00:40:41.960 purports to
00:40:42.660 show
00:40:42.960 tim waltz
00:40:43.880 in a number
00:40:44.420 of
00:40:44.880 manly
00:40:46.400 pursuits
00:40:47.000 you know
00:40:48.360 he's using
00:40:49.200 tools
00:40:49.680 he's driving
00:40:50.420 cars
00:40:50.920 he's he
00:40:51.660 owns guns
00:40:52.320 he's got
00:40:52.800 a dog
00:40:53.360 he's a
00:40:54.000 man's
00:40:54.780 man
00:40:55.100 but i
00:40:56.360 have to
00:40:56.680 say that
00:40:57.300 if i can
00:40:58.180 advise one
00:40:59.200 thing for
00:40:59.780 the harris
00:41:00.180 campaign
00:41:00.700 you should
00:41:03.700 hire at
00:41:04.640 least one
00:41:05.320 heterosexual
00:41:06.120 man
00:41:06.620 and you
00:41:07.820 would not
00:41:08.180 embarrass
00:41:08.540 yourself
00:41:09.060 this much
00:41:10.200 because if
00:41:11.500 you saw
00:41:11.880 the commercial
00:41:12.440 it is the
00:41:13.780 gayest
00:41:14.560 looking thing
00:41:15.920 you've ever
00:41:16.320 seen in your
00:41:16.880 life
00:41:17.240 while trying
00:41:18.220 to to
00:41:19.200 teach us
00:41:19.780 how manly
00:41:20.500 he is
00:41:20.960 and
00:41:21.860 you know
00:41:23.240 this is not
00:41:23.740 a criticism
00:41:24.300 against anybody
00:41:25.120 gay
00:41:25.560 i'm just
00:41:26.400 saying
00:41:26.760 if i were
00:41:27.700 doing a
00:41:28.180 commercial
00:41:28.560 about how
00:41:29.320 to be a
00:41:29.800 gay man
00:41:30.360 i would
00:41:31.480 hire a
00:41:31.920 gay man
00:41:32.500 i wouldn't
00:41:34.640 hire a
00:41:35.160 lesbian
00:41:35.560 i would
00:41:36.980 if the
00:41:37.600 commercial is
00:41:38.360 let's show
00:41:38.820 this guy
00:41:39.240 as a
00:41:39.520 heterosexual
00:41:40.100 man
00:41:40.520 i would
00:41:41.340 have
00:41:41.540 heterosexual
00:41:42.220 men
00:41:42.560 working on
00:41:43.100 it
00:41:43.300 and nobody
00:41:44.520 else
00:41:44.920 because they
00:41:47.400 know
00:41:47.820 far better
00:41:49.400 what it's
00:41:50.060 like to be
00:41:50.540 a heterosexual
00:41:51.180 man
00:41:51.520 again if
00:41:52.380 it were
00:41:52.600 for black
00:41:53.180 voters
00:41:53.620 i'd make
00:41:54.520 sure that
00:41:54.980 the
00:41:55.180 commercial
00:41:55.580 was mostly
00:41:56.320 managed by
00:41:56.960 black voters
00:41:58.080 because they
00:41:58.820 would know
00:41:59.120 what black
00:41:59.540 voters are
00:42:00.640 feeling and
00:42:01.160 thinking better
00:42:01.720 than other
00:42:02.060 people would
00:42:02.540 so harris
00:42:04.280 campaign needs
00:42:05.020 to find at
00:42:05.660 least one
00:42:06.300 heterosexual
00:42:06.980 man
00:42:07.500 maybe a
00:42:08.900 token
00:42:09.180 you know
00:42:10.340 you don't
00:42:10.640 have to
00:42:10.900 give them
00:42:11.140 a lot
00:42:11.440 of power
00:42:11.860 but at
00:42:13.020 least put
00:42:13.360 them in
00:42:13.560 the room
00:42:14.080 to say
00:42:15.460 um
00:42:16.460 that uh
00:42:17.860 that looks
00:42:19.200 super gay
00:42:19.900 just you know
00:42:22.740 so they know
00:42:23.240 it before they
00:42:23.760 put it out
00:42:24.280 so that's my
00:42:24.980 advice
00:42:25.340 they need a
00:42:26.600 heterosexual
00:42:27.260 man to do
00:42:27.880 some serious
00:42:28.660 mansplaining
00:42:29.460 it's just one
00:42:31.760 of the one
00:42:32.240 of the times
00:42:32.640 mansplaining is
00:42:33.600 exactly what
00:42:34.300 you need
00:42:34.680 um did you
00:42:37.140 know that uh
00:42:38.180 the the ad
00:42:39.700 probably the
00:42:40.700 first ad you
00:42:41.380 saw for a
00:42:42.160 kamala kamala
00:42:43.000 harris ad that
00:42:44.600 was men for
00:42:45.300 kamala was
00:42:46.100 written by one
00:42:46.700 of jimmy
00:42:47.200 kimmel's
00:42:47.640 writers jacob
00:42:48.880 reed and uh
00:42:51.380 uh apparently
00:42:54.720 none of the
00:42:55.400 men who were
00:42:55.920 used in that
00:42:56.580 ad of men
00:42:57.680 for kamala
00:42:58.320 were actual
00:42:59.600 uh regular
00:43:00.580 people they
00:43:02.060 were paid
00:43:02.680 actors so
00:43:04.480 the men for
00:43:05.280 kamala weren't
00:43:06.920 even the men
00:43:07.600 for kamala i
00:43:08.520 mean they might
00:43:09.000 also be for
00:43:10.180 her but they
00:43:11.200 were paid
00:43:11.560 actors i i
00:43:13.880 guess they
00:43:14.260 couldn't get
00:43:14.680 any like real
00:43:16.460 normal men that
00:43:17.720 look good on
00:43:18.300 camera who
00:43:18.940 would just say
00:43:19.580 that they were
00:43:20.020 for kamala
00:43:20.580 harris i'm
00:43:22.160 pretty sure
00:43:22.640 there are tens
00:43:23.140 of millions of
00:43:23.820 them but they
00:43:24.340 couldn't find
00:43:24.780 anybody they
00:43:25.300 were happy
00:43:25.640 with so
00:43:26.100 they got
00:43:26.720 actors well
00:43:29.240 harris has
00:43:29.820 released her
00:43:30.600 uh health
00:43:31.900 records i
00:43:33.240 think trump
00:43:33.940 has not for
00:43:35.080 this cycle
00:43:35.640 um but what
00:43:37.260 i wonder is
00:43:38.620 did they test
00:43:39.400 her for drugs
00:43:40.240 and why not
00:43:42.300 if i'm going
00:43:44.480 to see a
00:43:45.260 presidential
00:43:45.740 candidate's
00:43:46.860 um health
00:43:48.400 records
00:43:49.000 and it
00:43:50.180 doesn't have
00:43:50.600 a drug
00:43:50.960 test
00:43:51.380 i don't
00:43:53.640 really think
00:43:54.160 i've seen
00:43:54.560 the records
00:43:55.160 because if
00:43:56.720 somebody is
00:43:57.400 acting so
00:43:58.560 drunk or
00:43:59.460 inebriated on
00:44:00.460 something then
00:44:01.620 it becomes a
00:44:02.280 major campaign
00:44:03.360 question and
00:44:05.080 you don't reveal
00:44:05.880 any you know
00:44:06.960 drug tests that
00:44:07.960 would indicate a
00:44:09.160 drug problem or
00:44:10.120 any other drug
00:44:10.820 use um i'm
00:44:12.680 going to say
00:44:13.020 that's not
00:44:13.480 actually a
00:44:14.080 health record
00:44:14.660 or even
00:44:16.040 close that
00:44:17.520 would be a
00:44:18.080 partial that
00:44:19.700 would be a
00:44:20.160 partial health
00:44:21.020 record intentionally
00:44:22.680 keeping out
00:44:23.520 important elements
00:44:24.820 now if it were
00:44:26.140 trump i probably
00:44:27.040 wouldn't even ask
00:44:27.640 for that
00:44:28.060 because you
00:44:29.840 know he's so
00:44:30.220 famously a
00:44:30.960 non-drinker and
00:44:31.920 he never looks
00:44:33.100 like he's on
00:44:33.600 any kind of
00:44:34.020 drug so i
00:44:36.520 think we need
00:44:37.060 to know she
00:44:37.760 needs a drug
00:44:38.300 test and i
00:44:39.780 don't mean that
00:44:40.380 purely politically
00:44:41.540 i i've seen
00:44:43.900 how she acts
00:44:44.780 and i don't
00:44:46.740 want that person
00:44:47.760 in charge of
00:44:48.500 the nuclear
00:44:49.080 football so
00:44:51.300 you need to
00:44:52.080 you need to
00:44:52.600 tell me is
00:44:53.280 that real is
00:44:54.980 the way you're
00:44:55.480 acting in that
00:44:56.120 video real or
00:44:58.360 are you drunk
00:44:59.180 because if it's
00:45:01.000 drunk i don't
00:45:02.080 want you near the
00:45:02.840 nuclear button i
00:45:05.620 mean really
00:45:06.220 seriously that's
00:45:07.180 important so
00:45:09.620 anyway
00:45:10.680 um i heard
00:45:15.820 today in the
00:45:16.800 comments to
00:45:17.760 uh post about
00:45:19.300 tim wals a
00:45:20.360 set of
00:45:20.920 accusations
00:45:21.580 that were
00:45:23.360 very specific
00:45:24.740 and very
00:45:26.940 terrible
00:45:27.420 they are
00:45:29.480 sufficiently
00:45:30.220 terrible
00:45:30.840 uh it's an
00:45:32.580 accusation of
00:45:33.560 a past
00:45:34.200 behavior
00:45:34.820 uh during
00:45:36.140 his football
00:45:37.280 coaching years
00:45:38.180 now it is
00:45:40.140 so bad
00:45:40.880 that i'm not
00:45:41.800 going to
00:45:42.160 repeat it
00:45:42.900 okay and
00:45:44.420 it's not
00:45:44.800 from it's
00:45:45.460 not from a
00:45:46.360 credible source
00:45:48.440 meaning some
00:45:50.200 platform that i
00:45:51.080 would believe
00:45:51.960 it's from an
00:45:53.080 individual but
00:45:53.940 the the thing
00:45:54.760 that bothered me
00:45:55.400 about it is it
00:45:56.180 was really
00:45:56.600 detailed
00:45:57.120 it was really
00:45:58.820 detailed
00:45:59.300 so maybe
00:46:02.500 there's something
00:46:03.080 to come out
00:46:03.840 i'm definitely
00:46:05.440 not going to
00:46:05.980 tell you what
00:46:06.460 i read
00:46:06.960 because of
00:46:08.140 the source
00:46:08.620 but if
00:46:10.860 it's true
00:46:11.440 wow
00:46:14.080 thanks paul
00:46:15.920 if it's
00:46:18.200 true
00:46:18.440 well the
00:46:22.300 polling
00:46:22.820 information is
00:46:24.040 all over the
00:46:24.560 place
00:46:24.960 the
00:46:26.000 538
00:46:27.960 forecasts
00:46:29.460 as harris
00:46:30.140 remains ahead
00:46:30.900 in pennsylvania
00:46:31.620 nevada wisconsin
00:46:32.520 and michigan
00:46:33.140 which would
00:46:35.220 give her enough
00:46:35.720 to win
00:46:36.160 538
00:46:39.280 have you heard
00:46:39.780 of them
00:46:40.040 538
00:46:40.840 so that used
00:46:42.460 to be
00:46:43.340 nate silver's
00:46:44.580 entity
00:46:45.980 but he sold
00:46:47.580 that and he's
00:46:48.220 out of that
00:46:48.700 now i think
00:46:49.960 it's just
00:46:50.360 the new york
00:46:51.080 times owns it
00:46:51.960 there's the
00:46:52.800 new york times
00:46:53.420 own 538
00:46:54.300 i'm not sure
00:46:55.680 who owns it
00:46:56.360 but this is
00:46:57.820 a different
00:46:58.300 result than
00:46:58.940 i'm seeing
00:46:59.340 in other
00:46:59.760 news
00:47:00.140 in other
00:47:02.040 news
00:47:02.560 real clear
00:47:03.820 politics
00:47:04.340 is flipping
00:47:05.020 nevada
00:47:05.520 for trump
00:47:06.140 which i think
00:47:06.960 would give
00:47:07.360 him all
00:47:07.840 of the
00:47:08.120 swing states
00:47:08.860 because i've
00:47:10.260 been hearing
00:47:10.620 the last
00:47:11.000 24 hours
00:47:11.800 oh it looks
00:47:12.300 like trump's
00:47:12.860 going to win
00:47:13.200 all the
00:47:13.500 swing states
00:47:14.220 or could
00:47:15.400 with the
00:47:16.360 exception
00:47:16.700 of nevada
00:47:17.460 and then
00:47:18.800 today's news
00:47:19.480 is oh
00:47:20.480 he's going
00:47:20.720 to win
00:47:20.920 nevada
00:47:21.360 now keep
00:47:24.080 in mind
00:47:24.560 that i
00:47:25.740 don't
00:47:25.920 believe
00:47:26.420 anything
00:47:28.100 about the
00:47:29.360 polls at
00:47:29.980 the moment
00:47:30.460 they're just
00:47:31.380 all over
00:47:31.940 the place
00:47:32.480 and they're
00:47:33.000 crazy and
00:47:33.760 they disagree
00:47:34.280 with each
00:47:34.780 other
00:47:35.020 but the
00:47:36.300 so on
00:47:37.560 one hand
00:47:38.160 538 says
00:47:39.740 harris is
00:47:40.400 ahead in
00:47:41.140 the swing
00:47:41.600 states
00:47:42.120 on the
00:47:43.480 other hand
00:47:43.920 real clear
00:47:44.460 politics
00:47:45.040 says that
00:47:46.140 he's she's
00:47:47.200 so far
00:47:47.580 behind she's
00:47:48.260 even gonna
00:47:48.680 lose nevada
00:47:49.460 in other
00:47:52.440 news
00:47:52.980 the apparently
00:47:54.680 the number
00:47:55.200 of mail-in
00:47:56.000 votes is
00:47:56.580 way way
00:47:57.300 down in
00:47:58.100 in the
00:47:58.820 swing states
00:47:59.540 and that
00:48:00.680 presumably
00:48:01.360 would help
00:48:01.980 trump
00:48:02.380 we don't
00:48:03.160 know
00:48:03.500 so
00:48:04.760 it does
00:48:07.360 seem and
00:48:07.940 and then
00:48:08.320 there's another
00:48:08.880 thought that
00:48:10.480 i think
00:48:11.720 was it
00:48:12.360 mark
00:48:12.560 halperin
00:48:13.020 who's saying
00:48:13.360 this that
00:48:14.220 the the
00:48:15.260 internal polls
00:48:16.260 are worse
00:48:17.160 than the
00:48:17.540 public ones
00:48:18.200 and the
00:48:19.140 reason is
00:48:19.700 that the
00:48:20.020 internal ones
00:48:20.820 are maybe
00:48:21.280 the expensive
00:48:22.600 and good
00:48:23.100 ones
00:48:23.440 so
00:48:25.120 we'll see
00:48:27.000 rasmussen
00:48:28.080 is signaling
00:48:29.420 that trump's
00:48:30.760 you know
00:48:31.720 got a got
00:48:32.340 a solid
00:48:32.840 situation
00:48:34.020 here
00:48:34.340 and then
00:48:35.480 if you
00:48:36.280 looked at
00:48:36.720 the the
00:48:38.320 results
00:48:38.780 against trump
00:48:39.880 the funny
00:48:40.880 thing about
00:48:41.300 having trump
00:48:41.840 run for
00:48:42.240 election three
00:48:42.840 times in a
00:48:43.380 row is
00:48:44.240 that you
00:48:44.740 have a
00:48:45.020 baseline to
00:48:45.660 compare things
00:48:46.320 to that's
00:48:46.780 really interesting
00:48:47.380 and harris is
00:48:49.340 doing way
00:48:50.260 worse
00:48:50.760 compared to
00:48:53.820 either biden
00:48:55.000 who won
00:48:56.840 and also to
00:48:59.020 hillary
00:48:59.440 who lost
00:49:00.320 so
00:49:01.720 kamala is
00:49:02.900 way under
00:49:03.800 the numbers
00:49:05.000 that even
00:49:05.500 clinton had
00:49:06.460 when she
00:49:06.800 lost
00:49:07.260 although lost
00:49:08.780 very narrowly
00:49:09.840 so
00:49:10.900 what's
00:49:13.540 confusing
00:49:14.120 is
00:49:14.660 the harris
00:49:15.640 in the
00:49:16.500 polls
00:49:16.720 anyway
00:49:17.000 seems to
00:49:17.860 be maybe
00:49:18.480 one point
00:49:19.260 ahead or
00:49:19.940 effectively
00:49:20.620 within the
00:49:21.200 margin of
00:49:21.620 error on
00:49:22.420 a whole
00:49:22.720 bunch of
00:49:23.180 states
00:49:23.600 depending on
00:49:24.960 which poll
00:49:25.940 you're looking
00:49:26.300 at
00:49:26.520 and most
00:49:28.340 of the
00:49:28.560 smart people
00:49:29.040 would say
00:49:29.460 that if
00:49:29.880 he's tied
00:49:30.520 in the
00:49:30.920 polling
00:49:31.260 or within
00:49:33.280 one
00:49:33.660 it's actually
00:49:34.940 a win
00:49:35.320 because he
00:49:36.060 he always
00:49:36.680 performs better
00:49:37.600 than the
00:49:37.940 polls
00:49:38.220 but the
00:49:38.800 others
00:49:39.020 don't
00:49:39.940 so
00:49:40.740 if that's
00:49:42.200 true
00:49:42.520 that this
00:49:43.240 time he's
00:49:43.820 also going
00:49:44.320 to perform
00:49:44.760 better than
00:49:45.220 the polls
00:49:45.700 and I'm
00:49:46.760 speculating
00:49:47.640 that this
00:49:48.120 will be
00:49:48.400 the biggest
00:49:49.260 difference
00:49:50.560 between the
00:49:51.180 polls
00:49:51.560 and the
00:49:52.060 actual vote
00:49:52.700 so this
00:49:53.900 is my
00:49:54.220 prediction
00:49:54.580 so this
00:49:55.800 will be
00:49:56.000 the third
00:49:56.520 Trump run
00:49:57.360 and each
00:49:58.620 time they
00:49:59.080 say what
00:49:59.540 they think
00:49:59.980 the Trump
00:50:00.380 vote will
00:50:00.760 be and
00:50:01.300 each time
00:50:01.720 it's
00:50:01.920 bigger
00:50:02.600 two out of
00:50:03.880 three so
00:50:04.320 far
00:50:04.600 if this
00:50:05.800 one is
00:50:06.140 I think
00:50:06.500 this one
00:50:06.860 also would
00:50:07.240 be bigger
00:50:07.620 but I'm
00:50:08.320 going to
00:50:08.500 predict
00:50:08.800 it's the
00:50:09.300 biggest
00:50:09.700 of the
00:50:11.340 differences
00:50:11.820 that there
00:50:13.260 are more
00:50:13.620 people who
00:50:14.200 are intentionally
00:50:14.960 just pranking
00:50:15.980 the pollsters
00:50:16.660 than at any
00:50:17.840 time in the
00:50:18.320 past and
00:50:19.360 that they
00:50:19.760 know it's
00:50:20.180 part of
00:50:20.460 winning
00:50:22.140 because they're
00:50:23.340 trying to
00:50:24.420 use a
00:50:25.680 prank
00:50:26.120 basically to
00:50:27.420 defeat what
00:50:28.160 they think
00:50:28.640 will be
00:50:28.960 cheaters
00:50:29.340 so if they
00:50:30.860 prank hard
00:50:31.540 enough
00:50:31.900 the cheaters
00:50:32.900 won't know
00:50:33.420 how hard
00:50:33.900 they have
00:50:34.220 to cheat
00:50:34.700 and they
00:50:35.700 may under
00:50:36.200 cheat
00:50:36.560 which
00:50:37.460 the belief
00:50:38.720 is that
00:50:39.220 that's what
00:50:39.600 happened in
00:50:40.060 2016
00:50:40.640 I don't
00:50:41.500 have any
00:50:41.840 evidence of
00:50:42.380 that
00:50:42.560 I think
00:50:43.580 Jim Cramer
00:50:44.180 came out
00:50:45.080 and said
00:50:45.400 that Harris
00:50:45.940 is going
00:50:46.260 to win
00:50:46.560 Jim Cramer
00:50:48.400 is sort of
00:50:48.900 famous as a
00:50:49.660 counter indicator
00:50:50.520 so you can
00:50:53.740 interpret that
00:50:54.680 any way you
00:50:55.140 want
00:50:55.380 Axios is
00:51:00.820 trying to
00:51:01.260 soften the
00:51:01.820 fact that
00:51:02.340 people are
00:51:02.780 learning that
00:51:04.000 Democrats
00:51:04.580 challenge
00:51:05.160 elections
00:51:05.700 too
00:51:06.000 so Axios
00:51:07.420 says that
00:51:08.780 when the
00:51:09.080 Democrats
00:51:09.480 challenge
00:51:10.100 elections
00:51:10.640 it's largely
00:51:11.280 symbolic
00:51:12.020 not like
00:51:14.860 those serious
00:51:15.540 challenges
00:51:16.040 coming from
00:51:16.680 the Republicans
00:51:17.300 so when
00:51:18.820 they do it
00:51:19.180 it's just
00:51:19.500 talk
00:51:19.900 it's largely
00:51:21.020 symbolic
00:51:21.720 for example
00:51:23.160 in 2017
00:51:24.940 or in
00:51:26.640 let's say
00:51:27.560 2005
00:51:28.360 Democrats
00:51:29.560 objected to
00:51:30.420 Bush's win
00:51:31.620 in Ohio
00:51:32.560 but you
00:51:33.860 know they
00:51:34.160 just sort
00:51:34.640 of went
00:51:34.860 through the
00:51:35.160 process
00:51:35.520 and worked
00:51:36.200 it out
00:51:36.620 and you
00:51:37.500 know they're
00:51:37.720 largely
00:51:38.020 symbolic
00:51:38.580 now is
00:51:40.920 it symbolic
00:51:41.520 if you have
00:51:42.060 to recount
00:51:42.620 the hanging
00:51:43.120 chads
00:51:43.640 symbolic is
00:51:46.180 when you
00:51:46.460 don't do
00:51:46.840 anything in
00:51:47.420 the real
00:51:47.720 world
00:51:48.160 they have
00:51:49.560 to recount
00:51:50.200 a recount
00:51:51.360 is not
00:51:51.640 symbolic
00:51:52.160 that would
00:51:54.020 be the
00:51:54.280 opposite
00:51:54.620 the recount
00:51:55.620 is an
00:51:55.960 actual set
00:51:56.920 of actions
00:51:57.500 that happened
00:51:57.960 in the real
00:51:58.440 world
00:51:58.780 that's
00:51:59.660 not
00:52:00.200 symbolic
00:52:00.680 that was
00:52:01.760 actually
00:52:02.060 trying to
00:52:02.500 find out
00:52:02.820 who won
00:52:03.240 about
00:52:04.560 2017
00:52:05.300 with half
00:52:05.960 a dozen
00:52:06.300 Democrats
00:52:06.820 filed
00:52:07.200 objections
00:52:07.780 to
00:52:09.480 Trump's
00:52:10.080 elector
00:52:10.500 slates
00:52:10.960 but they
00:52:11.740 didn't get
00:52:12.080 a backing
00:52:12.480 of any
00:52:12.860 senators
00:52:13.380 so they
00:52:13.940 couldn't
00:52:14.180 force
00:52:14.520 any
00:52:14.720 votes
00:52:15.080 so
00:52:15.780 largely
00:52:16.200 symbolic
00:52:16.900 no it's
00:52:18.240 not
00:52:18.540 that was
00:52:19.580 a full-on
00:52:20.380 attempt
00:52:20.820 that just
00:52:21.680 didn't
00:52:21.940 work
00:52:22.280 there was
00:52:22.880 nothing
00:52:23.120 symbolic
00:52:23.720 about it
00:52:24.320 it just
00:52:25.620 didn't
00:52:25.860 work
00:52:26.280 Jamie
00:52:28.800 Raskin
00:52:29.300 of course
00:52:29.740 he would
00:52:30.800 be the
00:52:31.380 figurehead
00:52:32.360 of
00:52:32.640 Democrat
00:52:33.500 lying
00:52:33.940 he said
00:52:35.120 quote
00:52:35.440 Democrats
00:52:35.940 don't
00:52:36.300 engage
00:52:36.680 in
00:52:36.840 election
00:52:37.200 fraud
00:52:37.640 and
00:52:37.820 election
00:52:38.160 fabrication
00:52:38.860 now
00:52:40.700 he's
00:52:41.480 also
00:52:41.820 one of
00:52:42.300 those
00:52:42.540 backwards
00:52:43.020 indicators
00:52:43.660 that
00:52:44.800 whatever
00:52:45.180 he says
00:52:45.640 they don't
00:52:46.120 do
00:52:46.360 oh they're
00:52:47.320 definitely
00:52:47.600 doing
00:52:47.900 that
00:52:48.240 so
00:52:50.320 if he
00:52:51.320 ever
00:52:51.480 tells you
00:52:51.940 they're
00:52:52.280 definitely
00:52:52.740 not
00:52:53.100 sacrificing
00:52:53.900 children
00:52:54.540 in
00:52:54.860 satanic
00:52:55.380 rituals
00:52:55.880 they're
00:52:57.720 definitely
00:52:58.320 sacrificing
00:52:59.220 children
00:52:59.760 in
00:53:00.260 satanic
00:53:00.820 rituals
00:53:01.400 by the
00:53:02.080 way
00:53:02.220 I don't
00:53:02.580 believe
00:53:02.820 that
00:53:03.180 but I
00:53:04.560 also
00:53:04.680 don't
00:53:04.900 rule
00:53:05.120 it out
00:53:05.560 I
00:53:07.200 think
00:53:07.360 it's
00:53:07.520 highly
00:53:07.800 unlikely
00:53:08.300 that
00:53:09.500 there's
00:53:09.780 a
00:53:09.940 massive
00:53:10.280 national
00:53:11.080 satanic
00:53:12.260 network
00:53:12.680 that the
00:53:13.440 Democrats
00:53:13.920 are all
00:53:14.260 plugged
00:53:14.520 into
00:53:14.880 and
00:53:15.200 Diddy
00:53:15.540 and Epstein
00:53:16.080 and all
00:53:16.480 that
00:53:16.680 I don't
00:53:17.480 think
00:53:17.740 so
00:53:18.060 but we
00:53:19.920 do live
00:53:20.360 in a
00:53:20.560 world
00:53:20.780 where if
00:53:21.160 you said
00:53:21.520 would you
00:53:22.360 give it
00:53:22.620 five percent
00:53:23.420 I'd say
00:53:24.160 yeah
00:53:25.020 yeah
00:53:26.960 I'll give
00:53:27.260 it five
00:53:27.640 percent
00:53:27.980 possibly
00:53:28.760 Ontario
00:53:30.360 the wait
00:53:31.380 is over
00:53:31.980 the gold
00:53:32.640 standard of
00:53:33.200 online casinos
00:53:34.040 has arrived
00:53:34.880 golden nugget
00:53:35.800 online casino
00:53:36.640 is live
00:53:37.240 bringing
00:53:37.620 Vegas style
00:53:38.340 excitement
00:53:38.820 and a
00:53:39.320 world-class
00:53:39.860 gaming experience
00:53:40.840 right to
00:53:41.420 your fingertips
00:53:42.240 whether you're
00:53:43.160 a seasoned
00:53:43.560 player or
00:53:44.220 just starting
00:53:44.840 signing up
00:53:45.440 is fast
00:53:45.980 and simple
00:53:46.980 and in
00:53:47.560 just a few
00:53:47.980 clicks
00:53:48.320 you can
00:53:48.700 have access
00:53:49.120 to our
00:53:49.540 exclusive
00:53:50.000 library
00:53:50.460 of the
00:53:50.840 best
00:53:51.180 slots
00:53:51.540 and top
00:53:52.180 tier
00:53:52.380 table
00:53:52.700 games
00:53:53.240 make
00:53:53.560 the most
00:53:54.040 of your
00:53:54.300 downtime
00:53:54.680 with
00:53:55.000 unbeatable
00:53:55.740 promotions
00:53:56.220 and jackpots
00:53:57.020 that can
00:53:57.340 turn any
00:53:57.940 mundane
00:53:58.380 moment
00:53:58.820 into a
00:53:59.340 golden
00:53:59.700 opportunity
00:54:00.340 at golden
00:54:01.140 nugget
00:54:01.580 online casino
00:54:02.520 take a
00:54:03.180 spin on the
00:54:03.640 slots
00:54:04.020 challenge
00:54:04.440 yourself
00:54:04.820 at the
00:54:05.040 tables
00:54:05.380 or join
00:54:06.060 a live
00:54:06.480 dealer
00:54:06.720 game
00:54:07.040 to feel
00:54:07.500 the thrill
00:54:08.040 of real
00:54:08.520 time action
00:54:09.220 all from
00:54:09.840 the comfort
00:54:10.320 of your
00:54:10.600 own devices
00:54:11.200 why settle
00:54:12.020 for less
00:54:12.560 when you
00:54:12.940 can go
00:54:13.300 for the
00:54:13.640 gold
00:54:14.060 at golden
00:54:14.860 nugget
00:54:15.340 online
00:54:15.840 casino
00:54:16.420 gambling
00:54:17.220 problem
00:54:17.700 call
00:54:17.960 connects
00:54:18.360 Ontario
00:54:18.860 1-866-531-2600
00:54:21.680 19 and
00:54:22.540 over
00:54:22.840 physically
00:54:23.240 present
00:54:23.560 in Ontario
00:54:24.120 eligibility
00:54:24.700 restrictions
00:54:25.360 apply
00:54:25.820 see
00:54:26.140 golden
00:54:26.420 nugget
00:54:26.760 casino
00:54:27.100 dot com
00:54:27.680 for details
00:54:28.360 please
00:54:28.660 play
00:54:28.860 responsibly
00:54:29.560 anyway
00:54:31.560 there's
00:54:31.980 a
00:54:32.360 there's
00:54:35.920 a
00:54:36.240 piece
00:54:37.340 in
00:54:37.620 slate
00:54:38.120 slate
00:54:39.880 is a
00:54:40.220 publication
00:54:40.700 and
00:54:42.420 written
00:54:42.920 by Ben
00:54:43.560 Mathis
00:54:44.820 Lilly
00:54:45.140 and
00:54:47.320 he's
00:54:49.120 talking
00:54:49.380 about
00:54:49.720 how
00:54:50.080 people
00:54:50.920 like
00:54:51.200 me
00:54:51.620 say
00:54:52.660 that
00:54:52.900 when
00:54:53.140 Trump
00:54:53.540 says
00:54:53.980 something
00:54:54.300 that's
00:54:54.580 not
00:54:54.780 true
00:54:55.200 his
00:54:56.060 hyperbole
00:54:56.640 as I
00:54:56.960 call
00:54:57.140 it
00:54:57.420 that
00:54:58.340 and
00:54:59.100 they
00:54:59.320 quoted
00:54:59.900 me
00:55:00.120 in
00:55:00.240 the
00:55:00.340 article
00:55:00.680 quote
00:55:01.180 Trump's
00:55:01.700 hyperbole
00:55:02.160 is
00:55:02.400 directionally
00:55:03.100 accurate
00:55:03.480 and benign
00:55:04.160 and
00:55:05.800 here's
00:55:06.080 how they
00:55:06.340 described
00:55:06.840 me
00:55:07.180 they
00:55:07.960 said
00:55:08.160 Scott
00:55:08.520 Adams
00:55:08.880 the
00:55:09.220 Dilbert
00:55:09.680 creator
00:55:10.180 turned
00:55:10.760 right
00:55:11.200 wing
00:55:11.500 thought
00:55:11.900 leader
00:55:12.200 am I
00:55:15.120 a
00:55:15.300 right
00:55:15.520 wing
00:55:15.780 thought
00:55:16.160 leader
00:55:16.420 I
00:55:18.780 don't
00:55:18.900 know
00:55:19.100 not
00:55:20.260 bad
00:55:20.520 but
00:55:21.100 they
00:55:21.260 didn't
00:55:21.460 hit
00:55:21.640 me
00:55:21.800 hard
00:55:22.080 they
00:55:22.280 just
00:55:22.480 noted
00:55:22.780 that
00:55:23.240 I
00:55:25.360 I've
00:55:25.680 got
00:55:25.860 this
00:55:26.220 framing
00:55:27.040 that
00:55:27.500 is
00:55:27.660 directionally
00:55:28.340 correct
00:55:28.740 even
00:55:29.020 if
00:55:29.260 it's
00:55:29.440 hyperbolic
00:55:30.020 and
00:55:31.220 then
00:55:35.420 they
00:55:35.660 tried to
00:55:36.100 fact
00:55:36.400 check
00:55:36.640 Trump
00:55:37.080 that
00:55:38.060 at an
00:55:38.560 October
00:55:38.880 5th
00:55:39.340 rally
00:55:39.620 he
00:55:39.920 told
00:55:40.200 a
00:55:40.500 story
00:55:41.700 about
00:55:42.160 a
00:55:42.520 woman's
00:55:44.380 weightlifting
00:55:44.980 record
00:55:45.560 that was
00:55:46.600 broken
00:55:46.920 by
00:55:47.300 somebody
00:55:47.800 who
00:55:48.040 was
00:55:48.300 born
00:55:48.580 a
00:55:48.780 man
00:55:49.120 and
00:55:50.000 had
00:55:50.140 never
00:55:50.440 lifted
00:55:50.800 before
00:55:51.280 and
00:55:52.240 so
00:55:52.440 they
00:55:52.700 fact
00:55:53.060 checked
00:55:53.320 it
00:55:53.580 and
00:55:53.900 found
00:55:54.160 out
00:55:54.420 that
00:55:54.680 that
00:55:54.980 wasn't
00:55:55.360 true
00:55:55.660 but
00:55:57.840 somebody
00:55:58.460 should
00:55:58.720 tell
00:55:58.960 Zuby
00:55:59.400 because
00:55:59.740 he
00:55:59.960 thinks
00:56:00.240 he
00:56:00.400 was
00:56:00.600 the
00:56:00.740 person
00:56:01.000 in
00:56:01.200 the
00:56:01.340 story
00:56:01.720 do
00:56:02.820 you
00:56:02.860 know
00:56:03.020 Zuby
00:56:03.480 famous
00:56:06.140 musician
00:56:08.000 social
00:56:10.160 media
00:56:10.680 personality
00:56:12.740 he's
00:56:13.720 got
00:56:13.860 a lot
00:56:14.120 of
00:56:14.300 he's
00:56:14.660 got
00:56:14.780 a lot
00:56:15.020 of
00:56:15.120 different
00:56:15.340 talents
00:56:15.840 so
00:56:16.040 it's
00:56:16.160 hard
00:56:16.300 to
00:56:16.460 describe
00:56:16.860 him
00:56:17.080 but
00:56:19.300 Zuby
00:56:19.800 famously
00:56:20.660 entered
00:56:21.260 a
00:56:21.640 woman's
00:56:22.640 weightlifting
00:56:23.220 competition
00:56:23.980 identified
00:56:25.080 as a
00:56:25.700 woman
00:56:25.960 during
00:56:26.680 the
00:56:26.940 competition
00:56:27.480 and
00:56:27.760 won
00:56:27.940 the
00:56:28.100 competition
00:56:28.620 now
00:56:30.040 that
00:56:30.440 was
00:56:30.700 a
00:56:31.020 story
00:56:31.340 that
00:56:31.540 a lot
00:56:31.760 of
00:56:31.860 people
00:56:32.100 in
00:56:32.360 the
00:56:32.520 right
00:56:33.860 side
00:56:34.200 of
00:56:34.340 the
00:56:34.520 political
00:56:34.900 world
00:56:35.280 have
00:56:35.460 heard
00:56:35.760 and
00:56:37.260 even
00:56:37.640 Zuby
00:56:38.140 when
00:56:38.600 this
00:56:38.780 was
00:56:38.960 first
00:56:39.240 mentioned
00:56:39.680 Zuby
00:56:40.360 posted
00:56:40.860 on
00:56:41.580 social
00:56:42.240 media
00:56:42.580 on
00:56:42.820 X
00:56:43.140 is
00:56:43.820 he
00:56:43.960 talking
00:56:44.240 about
00:56:44.500 me
00:56:44.800 or
00:56:45.320 I
00:56:45.460 think
00:56:45.640 he's
00:56:45.840 talking
00:56:46.060 about
00:56:46.280 me
00:56:46.420 or
00:56:46.540 something
00:56:46.700 like
00:56:46.860 that
00:56:47.060 and
00:56:47.580 I
00:56:47.700 think
00:56:47.880 he
00:56:48.000 was
00:56:48.340 because
00:56:49.360 I
00:56:49.520 think
00:56:49.720 it's
00:56:49.920 the
00:56:50.080 most
00:56:50.380 famous
00:56:50.920 story
00:56:51.360 of
00:56:51.780 somebody
00:56:52.240 entering
00:56:52.760 a
00:56:52.980 woman's
00:56:53.300 competition
00:56:53.820 as
00:56:54.400 a
00:56:54.520 man
00:56:54.760 and
00:56:54.980 winning
00:56:55.460 so
00:56:56.480 I'm
00:56:56.840 not
00:56:57.000 sure
00:56:57.140 the
00:56:57.300 fact
00:56:57.560 check
00:56:57.760 was
00:56:57.940 right
00:56:58.200 but
00:57:00.000 I'm
00:57:00.360 also
00:57:00.560 not
00:57:00.860 entirely
00:57:01.220 sure
00:57:01.540 what
00:57:05.760 anyway
00:57:05.900 so
00:57:06.260 yes
00:57:06.640 the
00:57:07.020 apparently
00:57:07.940 my
00:57:09.180 idea
00:57:09.660 that
00:57:10.060 Trump
00:57:10.380 is
00:57:10.700 directionally
00:57:11.420 accurate
00:57:11.860 is a
00:57:13.140 little
00:57:13.300 too
00:57:13.580 dangerous
00:57:14.020 for
00:57:14.340 the
00:57:14.500 Democrats
00:57:15.040 to
00:57:15.500 let
00:57:15.760 stay
00:57:16.240 out
00:57:16.460 there
00:57:16.620 without
00:57:16.840 a
00:57:17.040 little
00:57:17.160 push
00:57:17.440 back
00:57:17.780 so
00:57:18.480 they
00:57:18.600 tried
00:57:18.780 to
00:57:18.920 push
00:57:19.100 back
00:57:19.400 on
00:57:19.600 it
00:57:19.780 but
00:57:20.640 wasn't
00:57:21.020 much
00:57:21.240 of a
00:57:21.480 push
00:57:21.800 so
00:57:22.860 I
00:57:23.260 came
00:57:23.480 out
00:57:23.640 okay
00:57:23.900 on
00:57:24.080 that
00:57:24.280 Trump
00:57:26.760 is
00:57:27.120 teasing
00:57:27.740 that
00:57:28.140 Kamala
00:57:28.460 Harris
00:57:28.700 is
00:57:28.900 doing
00:57:29.100 so
00:57:29.360 poorly
00:57:29.720 that
00:57:30.600 the
00:57:30.760 Democrats
00:57:31.220 must
00:57:31.520 be
00:57:31.720 thinking
00:57:32.020 about
00:57:32.520 switching
00:57:33.680 around
00:57:34.100 a few
00:57:34.940 weeks
00:57:35.200 before
00:57:35.760 election
00:57:36.040 I
00:57:36.800 don't
00:57:37.000 think
00:57:37.220 that's
00:57:37.520 going
00:57:37.640 to
00:57:37.720 happen
00:57:38.020 but
00:57:39.460 I'll
00:57:39.600 bet
00:57:39.760 I'm
00:57:39.940 not
00:57:40.200 I
00:57:40.640 wouldn't
00:57:40.860 be
00:57:41.020 surprised
00:57:41.440 if
00:57:41.700 it's
00:57:41.860 been
00:57:42.080 discussed
00:57:43.340 she's
00:57:44.660 doing
00:57:44.900 so
00:57:45.220 poorly
00:57:45.620 really
00:57:45.980 worse
00:57:46.320 than
00:57:46.560 any
00:57:46.860 candidate
00:57:47.240 ever
00:57:48.460 I
00:57:49.580 mean
00:57:49.740 we
00:57:50.200 always
00:57:50.400 make
00:57:50.600 fun
00:57:50.820 of
00:57:50.940 Dukakis
00:57:51.440 remember
00:57:52.640 when
00:57:53.080 Dukakis
00:57:53.760 ran
00:57:54.140 and
00:57:54.440 he
00:57:55.120 rode
00:57:55.680 around
00:57:55.940 in a
00:57:56.220 tank
00:57:56.520 and
00:57:56.680 everybody
00:57:56.960 teased
00:57:57.320 him
00:57:57.460 and he
00:57:57.640 lost
00:57:57.960 well
00:57:58.880 Dukakis
00:57:59.340 was
00:57:59.700 much
00:58:00.260 better
00:58:00.600 than
00:58:02.040 Kamala
00:58:02.400 Harris
00:58:02.740 as a
00:58:03.100 campaigner
00:58:03.700 so
00:58:04.260 she
00:58:04.440 is the
00:58:04.780 worst
00:58:05.060 campaigner
00:58:05.740 in the
00:58:06.080 history
00:58:06.380 of
00:58:06.560 campaigns
00:58:07.080 as far
00:58:07.440 as I
00:58:07.680 know
00:58:07.880 but
00:58:11.660 I
00:58:12.140 don't
00:58:12.380 think
00:58:12.660 they're
00:58:13.160 going to
00:58:13.360 switch
00:58:13.600 around
00:58:13.860 I
00:58:14.040 think
00:58:14.200 they're
00:58:14.380 going to
00:58:14.480 have to
00:58:14.700 live
00:58:14.900 with
00:58:15.080 what
00:58:15.240 they
00:58:15.360 got
00:58:15.540 here
00:58:15.720 there
00:58:16.700 there
00:58:16.720 are
00:58:16.860 reports
00:58:17.280 that
00:58:17.660 Trump
00:58:18.280 is
00:58:18.500 massively
00:58:19.060 ramping
00:58:19.580 up
00:58:19.740 his
00:58:19.940 security
00:58:20.460 we
00:58:21.000 don't
00:58:21.160 know
00:58:21.300 the
00:58:21.460 details
00:58:21.860 of
00:58:22.060 that
00:58:22.300 but
00:58:23.140 it
00:58:23.300 does
00:58:23.580 seem
00:58:23.980 that
00:58:24.400 the
00:58:25.740 threats
00:58:26.400 against
00:58:26.760 him
00:58:27.080 must
00:58:27.720 have
00:58:27.900 ramped
00:58:28.240 up
00:58:28.440 and
00:58:28.600 maybe
00:58:28.800 the
00:58:29.060 Iranian
00:58:29.420 thing
00:58:29.780 is
00:58:29.940 looking
00:58:30.140 bad
00:58:30.480 there's
00:58:31.320 some
00:58:31.580 indication
00:58:32.300 that
00:58:32.580 maybe
00:58:32.800 he
00:58:33.060 rides
00:58:33.460 a
00:58:34.400 decoy
00:58:34.940 plane
00:58:35.340 sometimes
00:58:35.900 and he's
00:58:36.320 not always
00:58:36.800 in his
00:58:37.160 plane
00:58:37.480 I don't
00:58:37.920 know
00:58:38.020 if
00:58:38.140 that's
00:58:38.360 true
00:58:38.560 but
00:58:39.600 we
00:58:43.300 got to
00:58:43.720 keep
00:58:43.940 him
00:58:44.080 alive
00:58:44.520 people
00:58:45.580 and
00:58:47.340 there
00:58:47.480 are
00:58:47.560 reports
00:58:47.940 that
00:58:48.180 the
00:58:48.440 secret
00:58:48.740 service
00:58:49.260 is
00:58:49.960 not
00:58:50.160 always
00:58:50.400 consistently
00:58:51.120 doing
00:58:51.680 a good
00:58:52.000 job
00:58:52.500 and
00:58:52.760 it's
00:58:55.000 scary
00:58:55.300 stuff
00:58:55.740 so
00:58:56.700 keep
00:58:57.120 him
00:58:57.280 alive
00:58:57.780 according
00:59:01.460 to the
00:59:01.920 Woodward
00:59:02.480 book
00:59:02.920 General
00:59:04.000 Mark
00:59:04.500 Milley
00:59:04.940 is
00:59:05.180 afraid
00:59:05.460 he
00:59:05.640 might
00:59:05.800 be
00:59:06.000 court
00:59:06.300 martialled
00:59:06.720 if
00:59:06.960 Trump
00:59:07.240 wins
00:59:07.800 interestingly
00:59:10.160 Mike
00:59:10.720 Benz
00:59:11.200 who
00:59:11.360 knows
00:59:11.560 more
00:59:11.760 than
00:59:11.900 we
00:59:12.080 do
00:59:12.280 about
00:59:12.620 things
00:59:13.180 has
00:59:14.420 been
00:59:14.580 saying
00:59:14.860 for
00:59:15.040 a
00:59:15.160 long
00:59:15.340 time
00:59:15.660 that
00:59:16.000 eventually
00:59:16.620 the
00:59:16.960 evidence
00:59:17.380 about
00:59:17.700 January
00:59:18.140 6
00:59:18.600 will
00:59:19.300 point
00:59:19.640 to
00:59:19.880 Milley
00:59:20.200 now
00:59:21.120 I don't
00:59:21.340 know
00:59:21.500 exactly
00:59:22.040 what
00:59:22.280 the
00:59:22.440 accusation
00:59:23.040 is
00:59:23.400 but
00:59:24.100 my
00:59:24.300 guess
00:59:24.620 is
00:59:24.920 that
00:59:25.240 it
00:59:25.460 would
00:59:25.560 be
00:59:25.680 something
00:59:26.020 like
00:59:26.520 Mark
00:59:26.960 Milley
00:59:27.320 might
00:59:27.700 have
00:59:28.040 intentionally
00:59:30.080 allowed
00:59:30.780 the
00:59:31.000 situation
00:59:31.520 to get
00:59:31.840 out of
00:59:32.140 hand
00:59:32.440 or
00:59:32.800 worse
00:59:33.300 may
00:59:34.500 have
00:59:34.640 been
00:59:34.820 part
00:59:35.160 of
00:59:35.420 instigating
00:59:36.040 things
00:59:36.480 that
00:59:36.700 made it
00:59:37.040 get
00:59:37.140 on
00:59:37.300 hand
00:59:37.580 now
00:59:37.920 that's
00:59:38.180 not
00:59:38.340 an
00:59:38.460 accusation
00:59:39.320 for
00:59:39.560 me
00:59:39.760 I'm
00:59:40.400 just
00:59:40.580 saying
00:59:40.860 that
00:59:41.160 if
00:59:41.900 it's
00:59:42.120 true
00:59:42.360 and
00:59:42.940 Mike
00:59:43.140 Benz
00:59:43.460 is
00:59:43.620 highly
00:59:44.140 credible
00:59:44.780 and
00:59:45.180 has
00:59:45.640 demonstrated
00:59:46.620 great
00:59:47.040 mastery
00:59:47.480 of
00:59:47.720 the
00:59:47.920 information
00:59:49.680 about
00:59:51.040 all
00:59:51.260 things
00:59:51.540 political
00:59:52.280 it
00:59:52.500 seems
00:59:52.740 but
00:59:53.860 maybe
00:59:55.900 maybe
00:59:57.460 it
00:59:58.820 doesn't
00:59:59.180 feel
00:59:59.420 wrong
00:59:59.820 to
01:00:00.040 me
01:00:00.280 but
01:00:00.820 I
01:00:00.960 also
01:00:01.160 don't
01:00:01.340 have
01:00:01.500 backing
01:00:01.840 for
01:00:02.120 it
01:00:02.260 so
01:00:02.360 I
01:00:02.500 can't
01:00:02.740 say
01:00:02.880 it's
01:00:03.060 true
01:00:03.280 but
01:00:06.200 I
01:00:06.380 will
01:00:06.520 be
01:00:06.660 interested
01:00:07.000 to see
01:00:07.400 if
01:00:07.520 anything
01:00:07.780 about
01:00:08.080 Mark
01:00:08.400 Milley
01:00:08.680 comes
01:00:09.000 out
01:00:09.320 I
01:00:09.820 have
01:00:10.300 long
01:00:10.640 had
01:00:11.060 a
01:00:12.120 feeling
01:00:12.500 about
01:00:12.800 him
01:00:13.100 and
01:00:15.360 my
01:00:15.540 feeling
01:00:15.980 is
01:00:16.360 he
01:00:16.840 doesn't
01:00:17.180 look
01:00:17.380 like
01:00:17.620 he's
01:00:17.920 exactly
01:00:18.400 on
01:00:18.700 my
01:00:18.940 team
01:00:19.280 but
01:00:20.940 it's
01:00:21.220 just
01:00:21.380 a
01:00:21.520 feeling
01:00:21.800 so
01:00:22.620 we'll
01:00:22.840 see
01:00:23.000 if
01:00:23.120 there's
01:00:23.320 anything
01:00:23.640 that
01:00:24.800 would
01:00:25.080 be
01:00:26.380 suspicious
01:00:26.880 about
01:00:27.280 his
01:00:27.500 activities
01:00:27.980 maybe
01:00:28.920 someday
01:00:29.260 we'll
01:00:29.500 know
01:00:29.820 New
01:00:31.420 York
01:00:31.580 Post
01:00:31.840 says
01:00:32.120 the
01:00:32.440 feds
01:00:32.980 have
01:00:33.120 deported
01:00:33.600 some
01:00:33.860 of
01:00:33.960 those
01:00:34.180 ISIS
01:00:34.600 migrants
01:00:35.280 who
01:00:35.560 slipped
01:00:35.840 into
01:00:36.080 the
01:00:36.240 country
01:00:36.560 some
01:00:38.340 would
01:00:38.520 say
01:00:38.720 that
01:00:38.920 most
01:00:39.100 of
01:00:39.220 them
01:00:39.360 have
01:00:39.540 been
01:00:40.040 in
01:00:40.600 prison
01:00:40.900 the
01:00:41.060 whole
01:00:41.200 time
01:00:41.580 so
01:00:41.800 they
01:00:41.940 weren't
01:00:42.140 dangerous
01:00:42.580 but
01:00:42.940 it
01:00:44.060 reminds
01:00:44.440 us
01:00:44.680 once
01:00:44.940 again
01:00:45.220 that
01:00:45.480 we
01:00:45.660 need
01:00:45.920 a
01:00:46.100 secure
01:00:46.420 border
01:00:46.800 not
01:00:47.200 whatever
01:00:47.480 is
01:00:47.640 happening
01:00:47.940 has
01:00:49.860 Israel
01:00:50.260 attacked
01:00:50.780 anybody
01:00:51.460 in the
01:00:51.800 last
01:00:52.040 hour
01:00:52.340 because
01:00:54.520 we're
01:00:54.740 waiting
01:00:55.020 for it
01:00:55.380 this
01:00:55.580 weekend
01:00:55.920 so
01:00:56.340 the
01:00:56.540 smart
01:00:56.780 people
01:00:57.080 are
01:00:57.240 saying
01:00:57.580 probably
01:00:58.540 this
01:00:58.940 weekend
01:00:59.440 Israel
01:01:00.760 is
01:01:00.940 going
01:01:01.140 to
01:01:01.240 do
01:01:01.440 some
01:01:01.700 kind
01:01:01.940 of
01:01:02.060 a
01:01:02.280 response
01:01:03.920 to
01:01:04.200 Iran
01:01:04.620 some
01:01:05.760 say
01:01:06.040 they're
01:01:06.280 not
01:01:06.520 going
01:01:06.700 to
01:01:06.800 attack
01:01:07.040 the
01:01:07.260 nuclear
01:01:07.640 facilities
01:01:08.240 some
01:01:08.680 say
01:01:08.900 they
01:01:09.100 might
01:01:09.460 some
01:01:10.260 say
01:01:10.520 they're
01:01:10.760 going
01:01:10.960 to
01:01:11.080 attack
01:01:11.340 the
01:01:11.720 oil
01:01:13.500 producing
01:01:14.060 facilities
01:01:14.840 they
01:01:17.000 might
01:01:17.440 they
01:01:19.020 might
01:01:19.380 I
01:01:20.760 don't
01:01:20.940 know
01:01:21.100 if
01:01:21.240 they're
01:01:21.400 going
01:01:21.560 to
01:01:21.940 you
01:01:24.080 think
01:01:24.300 they're
01:01:24.500 going
01:01:24.580 to
01:01:24.660 attack
01:01:24.940 Beirut
01:01:25.680 they
01:01:26.920 might
01:01:27.340 I
01:01:31.020 don't
01:01:31.140 know
01:01:31.420 we'll
01:01:32.440 see
01:01:32.740 then
01:01:34.460 there's
01:01:34.780 reports
01:01:35.320 of
01:01:35.540 some
01:01:35.740 kind
01:01:36.040 of
01:01:36.220 some
01:01:38.880 kind
01:01:39.100 of
01:01:39.180 maybe
01:01:39.340 there
01:01:39.560 was
01:01:39.680 a
01:01:39.840 cyber
01:01:40.140 attack
01:01:40.520 already
01:01:40.960 on
01:01:41.580 Iran's
01:01:42.040 nuclear
01:01:42.420 and
01:01:42.600 military
01:01:42.940 assets
01:01:43.440 I
01:01:43.660 don't
01:01:43.780 know
01:01:43.920 if
01:01:44.020 that's
01:01:44.260 true
01:01:44.520 and
01:01:47.280 what
01:01:47.480 do
01:01:47.560 you
01:01:47.660 think
01:01:47.920 you
01:01:49.680 think
01:01:49.880 it's
01:01:50.120 going
01:01:50.260 to
01:01:50.300 be
01:01:50.440 massive
01:01:50.880 because
01:01:51.600 if
01:01:51.780 it's
01:01:51.920 massive
01:01:52.440 Iran
01:01:53.060 probably
01:01:53.480 will
01:01:53.880 respond
01:01:54.980 if
01:01:56.320 it's
01:01:56.600 a
01:01:56.820 decapitation
01:01:57.740 strike
01:01:58.300 which
01:01:59.500 would
01:01:59.680 be
01:01:59.960 gutsy
01:02:00.520 big
01:02:01.500 risk
01:02:01.920 then
01:02:04.840 I
01:02:05.020 don't
01:02:05.160 know
01:02:05.400 how
01:02:05.600 they
01:02:05.780 respond
01:02:06.260 because
01:02:06.540 they
01:02:06.700 would
01:02:06.820 have
01:02:06.980 to
01:02:07.100 figure
01:02:07.280 out
01:02:07.460 who
01:02:07.560 was
01:02:07.680 in
01:02:07.820 charge
01:02:08.200 that
01:02:08.520 could
01:02:08.880 take
01:02:09.100 a
01:02:09.220 while
01:02:09.400 I
01:02:11.420 don't
01:02:11.560 know
01:02:11.880 there
01:02:14.160 might
01:02:14.380 be
01:02:14.520 something
01:02:14.880 lighting
01:02:15.260 up
01:02:15.500 this
01:02:15.740 weekend
01:02:16.080 but
01:02:16.360 we'll
01:02:16.520 find
01:02:16.760 out
01:02:17.040 I'll
01:02:18.260 give
01:02:18.440 you
01:02:18.580 some
01:02:18.840 advice
01:02:19.340 that
01:02:20.260 I
01:02:20.360 would
01:02:20.480 like
01:02:20.660 to
01:02:20.820 give
01:02:21.180 well
01:02:22.040 I'll
01:02:22.740 just
01:02:22.880 give
01:02:23.080 you
01:02:23.180 some
01:02:23.380 advice
01:02:23.760 you're
01:02:27.240 probably
01:02:27.540 feeling
01:02:27.940 more
01:02:28.200 anxious
01:02:28.600 than
01:02:29.160 you
01:02:29.320 have
01:02:29.640 maybe
01:02:31.220 much
01:02:31.560 of
01:02:31.740 your
01:02:31.880 life
01:02:32.240 but
01:02:33.560 a
01:02:33.800 lot
01:02:33.960 of
01:02:34.100 that
01:02:34.300 is
01:02:34.520 that
01:02:34.680 the
01:02:34.860 news
01:02:35.260 is
01:02:35.480 just
01:02:35.700 saturating
01:02:36.300 you
01:02:36.560 with
01:02:36.800 bad
01:02:37.200 news
01:02:37.700 and
01:02:37.900 scary
01:02:38.220 things
01:02:38.740 more
01:02:39.100 than
01:02:39.260 ever
01:02:39.500 so
01:02:40.700 we're
01:02:40.980 probably
01:02:41.280 not
01:02:41.620 in
01:02:41.800 any
01:02:42.000 worse
01:02:42.300 shape
01:02:42.760 survival
01:02:43.740 wise
01:02:44.260 than
01:02:44.660 we've
01:02:44.920 ever
01:02:45.120 been
01:02:45.540 at
01:02:45.880 any
01:02:46.100 time
01:02:46.340 in
01:02:46.460 the
01:02:46.580 country
01:02:46.860 in
01:02:47.440 fact
01:02:47.700 we're
01:02:47.940 probably
01:02:48.360 in
01:02:48.600 better
01:02:48.980 shape
01:02:49.420 risk
01:02:51.060 wise
01:02:51.460 than
01:02:51.740 maybe
01:02:52.580 any
01:02:52.840 time
01:02:53.100 in
01:02:53.220 history
01:02:53.540 now
01:02:54.460 that
01:02:54.620 doesn't
01:02:54.860 mean
01:02:55.020 everything's
01:02:55.520 going
01:02:55.700 to
01:02:55.780 go
01:02:55.940 right
01:02:56.360 but
01:02:57.320 if
01:02:57.440 you're
01:02:57.600 looking
01:02:57.840 at
01:02:58.020 risk
01:02:58.300 reward
01:02:58.780 and
01:02:59.100 compared
01:02:59.440 us
01:02:59.660 right
01:02:59.860 now
01:03:00.100 to
01:03:00.300 any
01:03:00.600 time
01:03:00.880 in
01:03:01.020 American
01:03:01.340 history
01:03:01.760 it'd
01:03:02.940 be
01:03:03.060 okay
01:03:03.420 it's
01:03:04.680 not
01:03:04.860 like
01:03:05.080 everything's
01:03:05.680 falling
01:03:06.040 apart
01:03:06.360 we've
01:03:06.660 had
01:03:06.800 about
01:03:07.120 this
01:03:07.380 many
01:03:07.740 complaints
01:03:08.860 before
01:03:09.400 gotten
01:03:10.320 out of
01:03:10.640 it
01:03:10.880 but
01:03:13.100 you know
01:03:14.500 the
01:03:15.060 thing I
01:03:15.760 would
01:03:15.960 advise
01:03:16.440 is that
01:03:17.720 the odds
01:03:18.360 of your
01:03:18.800 lights
01:03:19.440 and your
01:03:20.480 water
01:03:20.840 being
01:03:21.120 disconnected
01:03:21.800 for much
01:03:22.880 longer than
01:03:23.460 normal
01:03:23.820 are above
01:03:25.680 anything I've
01:03:26.420 ever seen
01:03:26.940 so I would
01:03:29.720 advise you
01:03:30.340 to get a little
01:03:30.920 extra food
01:03:31.720 and water
01:03:32.280 get some
01:03:33.280 batteries
01:03:33.740 get some
01:03:34.320 backup
01:03:34.660 generators
01:03:35.400 talk to your
01:03:37.200 neighbors
01:03:37.560 maybe get a
01:03:38.380 little more
01:03:38.700 organized about
01:03:39.560 who can do
01:03:40.200 what
01:03:40.520 who does
01:03:41.040 what
01:03:41.280 when
01:03:41.580 my
01:03:43.160 understanding
01:03:43.740 is
01:03:44.180 that you
01:03:45.240 can get
01:03:45.760 a
01:03:47.040 Starlink
01:03:49.240 internet
01:03:50.420 device
01:03:51.460 that can
01:03:52.760 be powered
01:03:53.340 just by
01:03:54.080 a small
01:03:54.960 camping
01:03:55.600 generator
01:03:56.200 like one
01:03:57.060 that uses
01:03:57.460 solar
01:03:57.900 so it
01:03:58.800 doesn't
01:03:59.060 use a
01:03:59.380 lot of
01:03:59.600 electricity
01:04:00.080 so I'm
01:04:01.480 thinking of
01:04:02.100 getting one
01:04:02.700 just as a
01:04:03.400 backup
01:04:03.820 Elon Musk
01:04:04.500 actually
01:04:04.900 suggested
01:04:05.460 that
01:04:05.760 it's not
01:04:06.280 a bad
01:04:06.520 idea
01:04:06.800 so it
01:04:07.740 wouldn't
01:04:07.940 be my
01:04:08.300 primary
01:04:08.700 internet
01:04:09.100 but I
01:04:11.240 did buy
01:04:11.900 two
01:04:12.980 solar
01:04:14.220 recharging
01:04:15.160 small
01:04:16.320 generators
01:04:16.840 so I
01:04:17.960 could do
01:04:18.300 small
01:04:18.740 appliances
01:04:19.260 I could
01:04:19.720 run a
01:04:20.100 fan
01:04:20.380 or charge
01:04:21.020 my phone
01:04:21.620 I could
01:04:22.460 keep one
01:04:22.940 refrigerator
01:04:23.400 running
01:04:24.020 but I
01:04:25.800 could also
01:04:26.180 run my
01:04:26.800 Starlink
01:04:27.620 now I
01:04:28.960 might run
01:04:29.420 out of
01:04:29.780 electricity
01:04:30.400 in the
01:04:31.440 evening
01:04:31.720 but then I
01:04:32.380 can recharge
01:04:32.860 it and
01:04:33.380 start over
01:04:33.840 the next
01:04:34.220 day
01:04:34.480 so Amazon
01:04:35.900 had some
01:04:36.480 so I
01:04:37.420 put it
01:04:37.740 in order
01:04:38.160 I'm
01:04:38.900 surprised
01:04:39.280 that they
01:04:39.640 had any
01:04:39.920 left
01:04:40.220 so they
01:04:40.620 haven't
01:04:40.840 actually
01:04:41.140 shipped
01:04:41.500 it
01:04:41.740 I'm not
01:04:42.740 sure if
01:04:43.080 they'll ever
01:04:43.380 be able to
01:04:43.840 ship it
01:04:44.220 because my
01:04:45.260 brain just
01:04:45.840 tells me that
01:04:46.500 there are too
01:04:47.120 many hurricanes
01:04:47.780 going on
01:04:48.360 and that they
01:04:49.480 probably already
01:04:50.380 were bought
01:04:50.860 out
01:04:51.120 but you
01:04:53.560 should all
01:04:54.100 give a little
01:04:54.660 more thought
01:04:55.400 to being able
01:04:57.280 to be
01:04:57.600 self-sufficient
01:04:58.460 at least for a
01:05:00.020 while I
01:05:00.660 can't tell you
01:05:01.240 how long
01:05:01.760 I mean
01:05:02.980 some people
01:05:03.860 are talking
01:05:04.240 about the
01:05:04.620 whole grid
01:05:05.120 being taken
01:05:05.720 out and
01:05:06.300 you know
01:05:06.640 we're
01:05:06.900 powerless for
01:05:07.960 months
01:05:08.380 maybe
01:05:09.920 I would
01:05:11.640 bet against
01:05:12.180 it
01:05:12.400 I think
01:05:12.720 the odds
01:05:13.080 are against
01:05:13.460 that
01:05:13.800 but the
01:05:14.540 odds of
01:05:15.000 losing power
01:05:15.700 for a week
01:05:16.480 are pretty
01:05:17.940 high
01:05:18.320 the odds
01:05:20.440 of losing
01:05:20.900 power
01:05:21.400 where you
01:05:21.920 live
01:05:22.300 for a week
01:05:23.280 just based
01:05:24.640 on either
01:05:25.000 a natural
01:05:25.520 disaster
01:05:26.120 or based
01:05:26.840 on a
01:05:27.340 hack
01:05:27.680 or something
01:05:28.020 like that
01:05:28.360 pretty good
01:05:29.300 the odds
01:05:30.440 of losing
01:05:30.900 your power
01:05:31.520 virtually
01:05:32.920 permanently
01:05:33.520 you know
01:05:34.240 some
01:05:34.500 catastrophic
01:05:35.240 attack
01:05:35.680 to the
01:05:35.940 network
01:05:36.300 low
01:05:37.820 but definitely
01:05:39.420 a possibility
01:05:40.160 but low
01:05:42.120 I heard
01:05:47.780 there were
01:05:48.040 some problems
01:05:48.720 with some
01:05:49.140 of the
01:05:49.380 natural gas
01:05:50.620 generator
01:05:51.200 backups
01:05:51.820 but I don't
01:05:54.060 know what
01:05:54.280 those problems
01:05:54.820 are
01:05:55.140 I'm short
01:06:03.440 of being
01:06:03.880 a prepper
01:06:04.440 but I'm
01:06:07.040 I'm prepper
01:06:08.900 adjacent
01:06:09.480 I'm prepper
01:06:12.420 adjacent
01:06:12.920 I'm right
01:06:14.500 in that
01:06:15.100 general
01:06:16.640 thought
01:06:17.240 category
01:06:17.780 but not
01:06:18.560 quite a
01:06:18.980 prepper
01:06:19.260 12 days
01:06:26.920 yeah
01:06:27.260 a lot
01:06:28.780 of people
01:06:29.120 put in
01:06:29.520 generax
01:06:30.080 well I
01:06:31.320 priced mine
01:06:32.000 it was
01:06:32.260 $100,000
01:06:33.000 so I
01:06:33.560 decided not
01:06:34.100 to do it
01:06:34.660 I might
01:06:36.540 look into
01:06:36.980 it again
01:06:37.340 maybe with
01:06:37.800 a different
01:06:38.140 company
01:06:38.560 all right
01:06:40.700 ladies and
01:06:41.500 gentlemen
01:06:41.840 that's all
01:06:42.760 for today
01:06:43.200 I'm going
01:06:43.480 to talk
01:06:43.720 to the
01:06:44.000 locals
01:06:44.380 people
01:06:44.740 privately
01:06:45.300 thanks
01:06:45.800 for joining
01:06:46.440 if you're
01:06:46.860 on X
01:06:47.420 and Rumble
01:06:48.400 and YouTube
01:06:49.940 remember to
01:06:50.640 get the
01:06:50.920 Dilbert calendar
01:06:51.580 you can only
01:06:52.120 get it at
01:06:52.560 Dilbert.com
01:06:53.300 and win
01:06:53.940 bigly
01:06:54.280 my new
01:06:55.020 book
01:06:55.320 my new
01:06:56.900 updated book
01:06:57.680 you see it
01:06:58.180 in the
01:06:58.360 background
01:06:58.720 it's available
01:06:59.520 on Amazon
01:07:00.100 the calendar
01:07:01.180 is not
01:07:01.560 available on
01:07:02.080 Amazon
01:07:02.380 you have to
01:07:03.260 go to
01:07:03.520 Dilbert.com
01:07:04.380 and you can
01:07:04.840 follow the
01:07:05.320 link to
01:07:05.800 purchase it
01:07:06.400 and delivery
01:07:08.700 of the
01:07:09.300 calendar
01:07:09.800 will start
01:07:12.580 in a few
01:07:13.080 weeks I
01:07:13.500 think
01:07:13.740 but we're
01:07:14.540 we're shooting
01:07:15.040 for making
01:07:15.620 sure everybody
01:07:16.180 has them for
01:07:16.760 Christmas
01:07:17.140 and the
01:07:18.600 sooner you
01:07:19.080 get it
01:07:19.500 the sooner
01:07:20.060 you will
01:07:20.580 get it
01:07:20.900 in the
01:07:21.220 cycle
01:07:21.580 sooner you
01:07:22.800 order it
01:07:23.440 all right
01:07:24.060 everybody
01:07:24.580 thanks for
01:07:25.980 joining
01:07:26.520 and locals
01:07:27.540 I'm coming
01:07:28.160 at you
01:07:28.560 privately
01:07:29.160 in 30
01:07:29.860 seconds
01:07:30.480 1
01:07:32.060 2
01:07:33.000 1
01:07:35.760 2
01:07:36.920 2
01:07:37.500 2
01:07:38.060 1
01:07:38.860 2
01:07:41.320 1
01:07:41.940 2
01:07:42.940 3
01:07:43.680 2
01:07:43.760 2
01:07:43.940 2
01:07:44.880 5
01:07:44.940 2
01:07:45.560 3