Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2628 CWSA 10⧸14⧸24

00:00:00.000 today. Well, we've got a show.

00:00:03.920 You might actually want to see it.

00:00:06.920 Hold on, hold on.

00:00:13.140 All right, I can make this work.

00:00:22.000 There we go.

00:00:30.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Human Civilization. It's called

00:00:39.620 Coffee with Scott Adams, and I can assure you that you've never had a better time in

00:00:44.280 your whole life. But if you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can even comprehend

00:00:49.820 with their shiny, tiny human brains, all you need is a cupper, mugger, a glass of tanker 0.96

00:00:54.260 gels, a stein, a canteen jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite

00:00:58.780 liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine

00:01:03.180 at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous

00:01:07.600 sip, and it happens now.

00:01:15.360 Oh, my goodness. I'm seeing in the comments a sign from Berkeley that says,

00:01:21.240 Conservatives welcome. Is there an official Berkeley statement that they're welcoming

00:01:28.340 conservatives? That's not true. It's not even close to true that they're welcoming

00:01:35.500 conservatives. It's ridiculous. 0.97

00:01:38.940 Well, the top of the news, according to Science Alert, drinking caffeine may reduce your Alzheimer's

00:01:44.280 clumps. Yeah, if you've got some clumps in your head and you put enough coffee in there,

00:01:51.780 the coffee will remove your Alzheimer's clumps. I feel like I've got a little clump forming,

00:01:58.800 so if you don't mind, then I'm going to take one more sip to see if I can declump that so

00:02:04.820 the show is that much better.

00:02:10.680 I think it's working. Yeah, yeah, I feel the clump going away.

00:02:16.860 Excellent. All right, here's your simulation thought for the day. This is going to ruin your

00:02:25.120 whole day. Here's what's going to happen. AI is going to train on everything in the real world.

00:02:33.800 So it's going to suck up the entire internet, already has. Then it's going to learn from robots

00:02:40.440 who are doing real things. So as the robots are learning how to do things, the other robots will

00:02:46.080 get that knowledge and then they'll all be able to do things. However, between the times that AI

00:02:52.800 has sucked up everything that's on the internet and the time that there are enough robots operating

00:02:58.140 in the real world just like their people, there's going to be this period where the AI is going to

00:03:03.280 be trained on artificial worlds. In other words, the AI will create an imaginary world and then it will

00:03:13.840 observe the imaginary world to learn things for the real world. How many imaginary worlds will each

00:03:22.400 AI platform form in order to train itself? The answer is more than one. So every AI that's based in the

00:03:35.460 real world will be creating probably multiple AIs just to train itself. So for example, it might train

00:03:44.560 an AI about a guy who lives in the real world, but he doesn't really, he thinks he does. He thinks he's

00:03:51.840 a cartoonist and he thinks he has one water leak related problem after another for his entire life and

00:03:59.280 can't get over the fact that it's such a bad coincidence. For example, right now my neighbors are saying,

00:04:06.880 is there some reason that this stream of water is running from your property down the road?

00:04:10.880 To which I say, hmm, I guess that will be number 1,625 things that I will have to look into to find

00:04:20.080 out about my water leak problems. Could it be that I am an artificial training module who is supposed to

00:04:28.480 live something like a normal life except it's peppered with continuous problems in just a few different

00:04:35.040 domains? I have a few other patterns like the water thing where there's something that happens to me

00:04:41.280 over and over, just my entire life, just to me, over and over. And as soon as one part is done,

00:04:48.000 a new part will jump in to replace it. Now that can't be a coincidence. It really can't be. There's

00:04:54.800 just no way that these are coincidences. So for the longest time, I've been under the impression that I'm

00:05:01.600 a training module. But I never thought I was training AI. I always assumed I was training just people

00:05:08.400 in another realm. But it makes far more sense since we know our AI will create the training modules.

00:05:16.880 The odds are that we're a training module. Or the odds are that I'm a training module and

00:05:23.520 you might be NPCs. I don't know. Or there could be one big fake world, but then the individuals are

00:05:30.400 placed into it in artificial situations that they can spot. So I will add to the thing that

00:05:39.440 Elon Musk says often that if you're going to create even one artificial world, you'll probably create more

00:05:46.400 than one. So the number of artificial ones that think they're real will definitely, a far out number,

00:05:54.480 maybe a billion to one, the number that are real.

00:05:57.040 Did you know there's a report from No Ridge, no with a K-N-O-W, that MIT engineers have figured out how to use 1.00

00:06:09.840 solar power for desalinization. Now you might say to yourself, Scott, I'm pretty sure they already know

00:06:18.080 how to use electricity to desalinate water. Duh! Well, here's what they did that's different.

00:06:24.800 They don't need a battery. Normally, if you're desalinating, you have to put a constant amount

00:06:30.560 of pressure to shoot the water through the filter usually, or whatever it is that they're using to

00:06:36.320 desalinate. But the MIT engineers found a way to moderate how much energy is going into the

00:06:43.040 desalinization based on how much sun there is at any moment. And that gets rid of the need for battery

00:06:49.840 storage, which is a big, big, big, big, big deal. It means that you listen to this number.

00:06:58.960 So I saw a picture that looked like it was maybe like the size of the, I don't know, the back of a

00:07:04.640 small van or something. But I couldn't tell how much that was the active part of the equipment,

00:07:09.600 but it fit in there. So it's, you know, it's not as big as a building. It's something you can put in a

00:07:13.680 truck. And it made 5,000 liters, I think. Where's that number? It made 5,000 liters of clean water in

00:07:23.920 one day, even as the weather was changing. So it wasn't always sunny, and it wasn't always daytime.

00:07:31.200 And it still made 5,000 liters of clean water in one day. That feels like a lot of water, isn't it?

00:07:37.600 Like, how much would you need to take a shower? How many liters? I don't know. It's hard to put that

00:07:44.720 in perspective. Anyway, did you know that there's a new university in America that's sort of anti-woke

00:07:52.880 and some billionaires are funding it? So in Austin, the University of Austin is brand new.

00:08:00.000 Well, brand new. November 2021 has started. It's got a couple of big billionaires behind it. It's got

00:08:05.920 Harlan Crow and Jeff Yass. And it's small. It's only got 92 kids in it, but it's growing.

00:08:15.920 So here, the free market is doing the free market thing. So there's actually a college you could go

00:08:22.000 to now without all the woke garbage. Will it work? I don't know. I still think that AI and robots are 0.97

00:08:31.600 going to be the new education system of the future. I don't think the idea of driving somewhere and

00:08:39.520 some big organizations in charge of your... I don't know if that model is going to work in the long run.

00:08:46.480 So anyway, you probably all know the story. Yesterday, Elon Musk's starship took off and

00:08:55.920 not only successfully took off and separated, which is what they were testing, but the hard part,

00:09:01.840 was the reusability. The reusability depends on this thing. I guess they can't do it the way the

00:09:09.920 other rockets do, which is simply to land, you know, standing up. For some reason, it can't do it.

00:09:15.680 I think it has to do with the size of the weight or something. So instead, Musk designed a gigantic set

00:09:23.760 of chopsticks. That's what he calls it. It's like two arms that are like chopsticks. And this gigantic

00:09:32.160 rocket falls down and these chopsticks grab it before it hits the ground. And you don't even

00:09:37.920 believe this could possibly work. It's the most ridiculously unlikely successful thing you've

00:09:44.960 ever seen in your life. Like I would have made a pretty big bet that that wouldn't work. There

00:09:52.080 it is. It's probably like a billion dollar bet that paid off. So I have to say that was one of

00:10:00.560 the most inspiring things I've seen. And I'm going to say what you're all thinking, but you don't want

00:10:06.320 to say it out loud because you're good people and you don't like to cause trouble.

00:10:09.760 Did you notice that we got the biggest, most impressive technical achievement out of the

00:10:19.120 company that's most famous for ignoring DEI?

00:10:21.600 Is that a coincidence?

00:10:28.480 It might be, it might be a coincidence, but it's hard to ignore that there's one person who's

00:10:34.880 the most vocal about being anti-woke and that that very same person's company did something

00:10:41.680 that we didn't even think could be done in America anymore because we don't have other companies doing

00:10:46.480 something that impressive anymore. So we just sort of thought, well, I guess we're done doing

00:10:50.400 impressive things. And then he does something that's so impressive, the entire world stopped

00:10:55.200 and said, wait, what are you doing over there? What?

00:10:57.440 Did you really just send an enormous rocket into space and then just catch it with giant chopsticks?

00:11:04.320 You did? My God, that is impressive. Now, I don't want to go too far and say that, yes,

00:11:12.800 it's because they ignore DEI. That's why they're successful. That's not, that's not in evidence.

00:11:18.480 That's not in evidence. I'm just saying it would be a weird coincidence if the person who's most famous

00:11:24.560 for being in favor of merit coincidentally had the best success. I mean, it could be a coincidence,

00:11:36.800 but I doubt it. I doubt it. By the way, I do think they probably do have some kind of DEI

00:11:45.440 efforts, but maybe they don't go crazy on it. Probably they do. Here's a stat from Evil Texan on X.

00:11:59.440 Did you know SpaceX has 13,000 employees and they're doing amazing things? And NASA has 42,000 employees

00:12:09.440 and your tax money is paying for it, unlike SpaceX. And so far, the 42,000 employees at NASA have managed also a success.

00:12:21.760 So they're both good. So SpaceX has put impossible rockets into space and rescued some astronauts.

00:12:30.640 And NASA with its 42,000 employees. Not to be outdone, they've launched a gay flag. So a gay flag. 1.00

00:12:40.560 So they've, they've matched the regular flag with a gay, gay flag. 0.96

00:12:47.520 And you know, it didn't launch itself, people. I mean, that flag didn't just get on that pole by itself. 0.66

00:12:55.520 That required NASA and its 42,000 employees. So good job, NASA, of raising a flag.

00:13:04.720 SpaceX halfway to Mars. Okay. Meanwhile, in a story that shouldn't be funny, but it is,

00:13:15.200 Bill Clinton went to McDonald's and he was being filmed from a short distance away, you know, just to see.

00:13:22.480 And the idea was, uh, apparently they were trying to see the reaction of the staff.

00:13:28.960 When Bill Clinton walks in and orders a hamburger,

00:13:32.240 imagine, just imagine what the ordinary staff would be there. They're just doing their McDonald's

00:13:36.960 job. It's like, Oh, would you like some fries? You know, you're, you know, would you like something

00:13:41.600 with that apple pie? And then the next customer that walks in is Bill Clinton, just by himself.

00:13:49.760 He walks up to the cashier and the cashier. Now, just so you can imagine it, it's not important to

00:13:55.040 the story, but just so you can visualize it. Imagine a, uh, maybe 20 something year old, uh, black woman. 1.00

00:14:06.240 And she looks up and she sees Bill Clinton standing on the other side of the cash register.

00:14:11.760 And she goes, Oh, Oh, Joe Biden.

00:14:20.560 And Bill Clinton had to introduce himself. Uh, no, I'm Bill Clinton. Well, then she was very impressed.

00:14:30.320 She, she did recognize that name and they, they got along great. Um, so that wasn't exactly what

00:14:38.960 they were planning on when Bill Clinton went to McDonald's, but it was still good. It was still fun.

00:14:44.880 So apparently Duke energy and his big solar farm in Florida, it's where they've got, you know,

00:14:50.240 gigantic number of, uh, solar panels on big fields. And, uh, I guess hurricane Milton or more specifically,

00:14:57.920 probably a tornado associated with it, just ripped a path right through the middle of it.

00:15:03.600 So one of the problems with solar panels is that a big wind storm will just rip them up.

00:15:12.640 I don't know. Is it, do you think that a nuclear power plant would have problems from wind or a

00:15:20.000 tornado? Would a tornado hurt a nuclear power plant? I feel like they would make sure that it wouldn't,

00:15:26.480 that that would be kind of basic to make sure that it was hardened against that. Um, but the,

00:15:33.120 the solar panels just got destroyed anyway. Um, so there's a report of a potential

00:15:41.680 third assassination attempt against Trump. Uh, but there was a little ambiguity this time

00:15:47.360 because the person who was captured didn't have guns with him, but he had guns in his car.

00:15:51.760 He, uh, apparently is a well-documented long time, uh, Trump supporter.

00:16:01.040 And there's evidence of it more than just him saying it. So he's, he's got a, uh, some girlfriend

00:16:06.640 type who says, I've been going to Trump events with him forever. He's a, he's a Trump supporter,

00:16:10.880 but the local police, um, local police sheriff said that because the guy showed up with multiple

00:16:19.200 passports, uh, in different names, he had an unregistered vehicle with a fake license plate.

00:16:24.480 He had loaded firearms in it. And, uh, apparently he had some, some fake way to get into the VIP section.

00:16:32.800 And the sheriff says, uh, if you're asking him right, right now, I probably did have W's

00:16:38.160 that prevented the third assassination attempt. So basically says, the sheriff says, we have a serious,

00:16:45.200 serious problem in this country, uh, because this is a common sense and reason. In other words,

00:16:51.600 the sheriff is saying that this guy was so sketchy in, in his behavior, not his thoughts.

00:16:58.720 We don't know what his thoughts were, but his behavior was so sketchy that to imagine it wasn't

00:17:05.760 that he wasn't up to something. No good is sort of unreasonable.

00:17:11.760 But from what I can tell, there's pretty good evidence. He's a Trump supporter.

00:17:17.120 So this one's a funny one. Um, I don't think I'm going to take the side of him being a assassin,

00:17:27.840 but anything's possible, right? Anything's possible. So I'm not going to rule it out,

00:17:33.520 but innocent until proven guilty. He has a history of being a Trump supporter.

00:17:39.360 And before that, apparently he was a Bernie guy. And I don't think the Bernie guy who becomes a Trump

00:17:46.400 supporter becomes an assassin unless there was mental illness involved. And apparently there wasn't.

00:17:53.600 But on the other hand, why does he need a unregistered car full of guns and fake passports with different

00:18:00.880 names? Well, uh, I'll just throw out a possibility that there are a lot of Trump supporters who say

00:18:10.720 things like, uh, I think Andrew Tate says this, that, uh, you should have multiple passports because

00:18:18.000 the country might not be safe. Meaning America might not be safe. So you might need a bug out country

00:18:24.160 or, or multiple bug out countries. He's not wrong about that. By the way, when, when Andrew Tate says,

00:18:30.880 maybe you should have some multiple passports just in case things go bad, wherever you are,

00:18:36.480 that feels like just sort of basic risk management. That's not crazy at all. I I'm not doing it myself,

00:18:43.200 but it's not crazy. So who knows? We'll find out maybe, uh, here's a reminder of something.

00:18:53.040 I did not know at the time. Maybe, uh, do you remember there was a case of the DC madam

00:18:59.760 and that there was some famous, um, madam of many prostitutes in DC and she got picked up,

00:19:07.920 arrested. And you said to yourself, uh, Oh, all the big names of the big politicians who use prostitutes 0.93

00:19:14.640 are going to come out, you know, like, like the Epstein list came out. 0.57

00:19:20.240 Well, more recently, like the ditty list came out. Oh wait, the ditty list didn't come out.

00:19:26.960 Oh wait, the Epstein list didn't come out. Oh wait, the DC madam list was never released.

00:19:35.200 Well, but at least, at least, you know, there's this, uh, uh, that in Congress,

00:19:42.880 I think the house, there's a fund for paying out with sex, sexual claims. So at least we've seen

00:19:50.000 the list of all the sec. Oh, no, we haven't. We haven't. So there are at least four different

00:19:56.000 lists of sex offenders of high level people that we know for sure exist. And we'll never see them.

00:20:08.400 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.

00:20:12.880 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,

00:20:18.800 you're richer than you think. Now, here's something I don't remember happening in the news.

00:20:24.560 So give me a fact check. Um, did Alex Jones, what did the DC madam tell Alex Jones that she wasn't

00:20:34.400 suicidal and then soon after was found in a suicide? Is that a real thing that happened?

00:20:42.000 I don't remember how that situation resolved itself, if that's, if that's the right way to put it.

00:20:47.760 But is it true that the DC madam said in public to Alex Jones that she wasn't suicidal

00:20:55.440 and then committed suicide? Allegedly? Is that a real story? Or did somebody just some,

00:21:04.240 I'm seeing yeses in the comments. How did I not know that? Like I missed that entirely.

00:21:09.360 Wow. And did you know that people were trying to get the client list from that madam reveal,

00:21:17.040 uh, reversed or not reversed? People were trying to get it revealed, the client list. And, uh,

00:21:25.440 there was a judge who decided not to. So who was the name of the judge back in those days who blocked

00:21:32.400 the client list from being revealed? His name was, uh, Judge Merrick Garland. Have you heard of him?

00:21:38.720 He would be the current attorney general. And, uh, as Mike Ben says, who knows more about this stuff than

00:21:49.520 all of us put together, he says, uh, Garland is the mop up man. He's a career janitor on permanent

00:21:56.240 sweep duty for crimes of the intelligence state. Hmm. Huh. Now it makes you wonder, doesn't it?

00:22:04.880 If you were the, you know, allegedly some kind of deep state people and you wanted to make sure that

00:22:13.520 you didn't personally go to jail, what is the one job that you'd want to make sure you had your person

00:22:20.720 in? It'd be the attorney general, wouldn't it? You'd want to really, really make sure the attorney

00:22:26.960 general's on your side, no matter who the president is. It wouldn't matter who's, who's in office.

00:22:31.680 You'd really, really, really want to make sure the attorney general's not on the president's side,

00:22:39.760 you know, less by coincidence, but more on your side, whoever you are.

00:22:44.400 And I say that because, uh, Liz Harrington is talking about, uh, that in 2020, December, 2020,

00:22:52.840 a quote, irate Bill Barr called investigators looking into Jesse Morgan's claims of hundreds

00:22:58.760 of thousands of completed mail-in ballots hauled across state lines. And Bill Barr, um, told the

00:23:05.560 investigators to stand down and he was quite agitated. It is reported and told them to stand

00:23:13.400 down. Do you remember the reasons he gave for that? The reasons for standing down on what looked

00:23:18.840 like a very credible claim of massive election fraud. Do you remember the reasons?

00:23:27.560 I don't, I don't remember any reasons. And, you know, Liz doesn't mention any,

00:23:34.360 I don't remember seeing any in the news. Did he have reasons? What, why would you have reasons?

00:23:40.200 If the investigators thought that there was something that was reported by a, as far as they knew,

00:23:48.680 a credible citizen, and it was a report of the most major crime you can imagine. And then Bill

00:23:54.760 Barr was one of the ones who was, you know, quite certain that the election was fair. How could he

00:24:01.080 know that? There's one thing you can't know, whether the election was fair. But Bill Barr seemed to act

00:24:08.840 like he knew it. Don't you think Bill Barr would know? Because he's been around everything and he's

00:24:14.280 smart. Wouldn't he know that it is unknowable if somebody cheated and got away with it? The only

00:24:21.480 thing you'd know is that you didn't have proof from some court or something that maybe you believed. But

00:24:29.640 you can't know the election was good. That's not a thing. You can only know you didn't find anything.

00:24:35.400 So here's my question. Are all the attorney generals sort of deep state people and it wouldn't matter

00:24:49.160 who the president was? I kind of wonder. Maybe that's the one thing you have to control and then

00:24:56.520 everything else takes care of itself. I don't know. Let's talk about the propagandists, the propaganda

00:25:04.760 network, MSNBC. They like to bring in these crazy generals. So the anti-Trump people like to bring in 0.98

00:25:14.600 generals. The generals they bring in are the least impressive generals I've ever seen. If the only

00:25:20.680 thing I knew about the American military was the generals that go on TV and say things about Trump,

00:25:26.680 I would immediately attack the United States. After seeing like three or four of our best generals,

00:25:33.160 I don't know if they're the best, but see, if you see three or four of our generals go on TV

00:25:37.800 and talk about how Trump is a fascist, I would just say, oh my God, they don't have any leadership

00:25:43.880 there. Attack now. They all look incompetent. So MSNBC propaganda network has this retired major 0.99

00:25:51.080 general, Randy Manor. And he says, quote, you tell me if this sounds like a reasoned, tactical,

00:25:59.400 strategic, brilliant general, or in this case, a major general. Quote, President Trump is demonstrating

00:26:07.800 the attributes of fascism every single day. And every American that is supporting Trump right now

00:26:13.960 needs to understand that they are absolutely supporting fascism if they vote for Trump.

00:26:20.360 And of course, there were lots of reasons to back up that opinion, right? 1.00

00:26:28.360 He just looked crazy as shit. You just have to look at the major general, just look at his eyes, 0.99

00:26:34.280 look at his face. And if he doesn't look crazy, maybe it's just bias. But I mean, they just don't look 0.60

00:26:41.400 like they're playing on the same wavelength as other people. They just look like, oh my God,

00:26:48.200 you were in charge of people? Like, how could this person have been in charge of sending people into

00:26:55.320 battle? My God. Anyway. And then Joe Scarborough said, quote, talking about Trump, he says,

00:27:09.320 he thinks fear, he thinks loathing, he thinks darkness wins. How do you combat that? You combat

00:27:15.960 it with being defiant, but being joyful. Talking about Harris. She seemed to strike that tone last

00:27:22.520 night very well. Talking about Harris's rally in North Carolina. Yeah. So according to Joe Scarborough,

00:27:29.480 if you want to beat fear, loathing, and darkness, you should do it with joyfulness.

00:27:34.360 Well, I'd like to give a little persuasion lesson to you. Persuasion lesson number one.

00:27:43.080 Nothing that Joe Scarborough says is worth listening to. That's number one. Number two,

00:27:52.280 fear beats everything. Joyful doesn't be fear. No, fear beats joyful 100% of the time.

00:28:00.680 That's not even a fair fight. Joyful can be boring. Joyful could be, you know, somebody who's less

00:28:12.280 capable. Joyful could be somebody who has maybe better, a little bit better policies. So joyful is

00:28:20.520 not empty. Joyful can motivate, but not against fear.

00:28:29.320 So imagine you're, you know, there's a knock on the door and you think it's the Venezuelan gang coming

00:28:33.880 to get you. What are you going to do? Are you going to ramp up your joyfulness?

00:28:42.120 Well, it looks like I might be killed by the people on the other side of that door that they're knocking

00:28:47.960 hard trying to knock it down. It looks like they're all armed, as I point out, if I look out the window.

00:28:53.720 But if we ramp up the joy, I think we can counteract this. No, no. Joyfulness is not a response to fear.

00:29:02.680 Fear wins every time. Every time. So that's your persuasion lesson.

00:29:11.800 And it's also the reason that the, and keep in mind, Morning Joe just had a major general on 0.92

00:29:20.040 to scare Americans into thinking that Trump was the scariest fascist alive. And then the very next 0.68

00:29:27.800 opinion is, well, you know, joyfulness beats fear on the same network, same morning, the propaganda

00:29:35.800 network. It's so funny. But here's something you don't hear about on the news. And it takes people

00:29:41.800 like me to really point it out. Let's see if this works. So here's a picture. You can't see it, but it's

00:29:48.760 a picture of young Joe Scarborough. And I think I understand why he doesn't shave his head. Because

00:29:58.120 if he did, he would look exactly like one of those gray aliens that we keep thinking are kidnapping 0.98

00:30:03.880 people. Now, if you're only listening to this, you are not seeing the hilarious side-by-side pictures

00:30:10.120 of an alien and young Joe Scarborough. But trust me, you'd be laughing so hard right now.

00:30:18.840 All right, let me get back to where I need to be. Back on me, where we belong. Speaking of propaganda,

00:30:26.760 the headline in the Washington Post is, quote, Trump urges using military to handle

00:30:33.080 radical left lunatics on election day. You think that happened? It's in the Washington Post.

00:30:40.120 It's a paper of record. It's one of the newsmaking papers, one of the most respected institutions

00:30:45.560 in all of America. So do you think it's true that Trump urged using military to handle the

00:30:51.720 radical left lunatics? Of course not. Of course not. Did he say, quote,

00:31:00.120 quote, that if there were any trouble around election day, did he say, quote,

00:31:05.480 it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary,

00:31:11.720 by the military, because they can't let that happen? Does that sound like urging to use the

00:31:18.280 military against the radical left? Or does it sound like if it's a last resort, we can't have the

00:31:25.240 country torn apart. So you might have to do what you got to do.

00:31:31.720 I see Mike Burke coming in from the locals. Looks like we have a success. That only makes sense to

00:31:39.560 the people on locals. Yeah. So Trump saying that in the worst case scenario, you would have to do the

00:31:48.680 thing that nobody wants to do, which is use the military, which to me sounds like a normal person

00:31:54.680 talking in a normal way. Washington Post says he's urging the military to take care of these

00:32:02.040 radical left lunatics. No, that's not exactly what happened. It was sort of a last, last resort kind of 0.92

00:32:09.400 thing. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online

00:32:16.760 Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your

00:32:22.360 fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just

00:32:28.280 a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

00:32:33.800 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane

00:32:39.000 moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots,

00:32:44.860 challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action,

00:32:50.000 all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold

00:32:54.680 at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600.

00:33:02.400 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:33:06.620 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.

00:33:11.140 Did you know that Time Magazine is currently owned by, at least in part, by Mark Benioff,

00:33:17.800 the billionaire owner of and creator of Salesforce? And so that means it's left-leaning because Benioff is

00:33:25.620 a big Democrat supporter. But even he is not too happy that Kamala Harris refused an interview in

00:33:33.500 Time Magazine. And he said, quote, Harris declined repeated requests for an interview for this story.

00:33:40.040 So Time Magazine did a big feature story about Harris without getting to talk to her.

00:33:45.060 Now, Time Magazine isn't what it used to be. You know, it used to be one of the most respected news

00:33:50.560 entities. At the moment, it's a, it's a hollowed out, you know, gawker, Huffington Post kind of

00:33:56.920 situation. So it's not really what it used to be. But still, she, she did not do it. And then

00:34:02.900 Benioff says, in contrast, Trump talked about his policy vision with a Time reporter for 90 minutes

00:34:08.740 across two interviews. Okay, that is an unambiguous statement that said Trump is a better politician

00:34:16.500 in this specific regard than Harris. That's really clear. You know, I got to tell you that I think I

00:34:26.040 may have told you this story. I used to do a lot of public speaking. And I've only had one person who

00:34:33.700 hired me for public speaking, tell me that I did a bad job after I was done. It was Mark Benioff.

00:34:41.160 And by the way, he wasn't wrong. He wasn't wrong at all. Because I wasn't doing speaking when when

00:34:47.040 the request came in. And so I slapped something together. Because they they're, I guess their

00:34:52.000 speaker canceled. So the speaker, the speakers bureau said, Oh, we got to find somebody who can drive

00:34:58.420 there. Because, you know, it's too late to travel. And I live locally. So they said, you know, would

00:35:04.820 you do something on short notice? And I was like, Oh, I really don't want to, but they're going to pay

00:35:10.320 you a lot of money. I was like, Oh, how much? And they said this much. And I said, Really? And I said,

00:35:15.760 I'll be right there. So I hung out, hung out with Benioff before the event. And I have to say,

00:35:23.620 he's one of the most impressive people in person you'll ever meet. You know, sometimes you meet a

00:35:30.700 rich person, and you say, How did you get rich? It must have been luck. But you talk to Benioff,

00:35:36.160 he'd go, Oh, okay, I get it. I see how you got rich. Yeah, yeah, his philosophy, his whole mannerism,

00:35:42.180 his charisma, his intelligence, the whole thing is there. Like he's missing nothing. But one of the

00:35:48.400 things that he can do is he can, you know, invite me in to give a talk and then tell me it was bad

00:35:53.640 after it was done. And, and the thing was, he wasn't wrong. That's what I appreciated. It was the

00:36:01.340 worst, maybe, maybe the worst presentation I'd done since I started doing it years before that.

00:36:08.140 So he wasn't wrong. And here he is, you know, he's very clearly a Democrat, but his person who's on his

00:36:16.180 side, Harris, fucked up. She said no to Time Magazine for a big feature piece. And so he's 0.99

00:36:24.720 just saying, Okay, in public, you're, you're no, you're no Donald Trump. So the first thing you have

00:36:31.020 to know about Benioff is that he's the real deal. If you do something good, he'll say so if you do

00:36:39.140 something bad, he'll say so with the same level of candor. So I mean, it's not an accident that he's

00:36:45.620 a billionaire, not an accident. Anyway, J.D. Vance was talking to ABC's Martha Raddatz. And he is so

00:37:00.980 good at this. J.D. Vance is a really good pick, because he, he just really dominates the interview

00:37:08.240 situation. And that's not, it's not common, not everybody can do that. But so apparently,

00:37:14.420 the mayor of Aurora, Colorado was saying that the, the issue with the Venezuelan gangs was real. But it

00:37:23.400 was a handful of problems, and that they were all handled. So there wasn't a real problem that needed

00:37:30.100 to be addressed at a national level. There were some problems, they took care of it, we're all good

00:37:35.380 now. Now, Trump had been saying something closer to, you know, the gangs were taking over the city of

00:37:42.020 Aurora, and the mayor was disagreeing. So Martha, so Raddatz was taking the mayor's, I won't say she

00:37:52.360 took his side, although she did, but she was quoting him to say that Trump was exaggerating the thing.

00:38:00.980 Now, here's what J.D. did, which was a very clever reframe. No, that's too nice. It was a weaselly

00:38:13.340 thing he did, but he did it so well, I'm gonna, I'm gonna point it out. So Raddatz says, it's only a

00:38:19.820 handful of problems. So she's quoting the mayor, there were only a handful of problems. But the issue was,

00:38:26.820 were there apartment complexes, in which the gangs had basically taken control of the apartment

00:38:32.560 buildings. Now, when you hear the phrase from the mayor, that there were a handful of problems, does that

00:38:41.420 tell you that there were a handful of apartments taken over by gangs? Or were there a handful of problems, and it

00:38:48.540 wasn't, wasn't that they took over the whole building, but they might have been in the building, and they might have

00:38:53.740 been a problem, and then they took care of it. What do you hear? When I hear there were a handful

00:38:59.640 of problems, I don't hear they took over a handful of apartment buildings. Now, again, I wasn't there.

00:39:07.280 Maybe they did take over a handful of apartment buildings, and I don't know it. But that's not what

00:39:11.720 the statement was. It was a handful of problems. But J.D. says, and very cleverly goes, he said,

00:39:20.940 a handful of apartments. So he changed a handful of problems into, well, you know, you're saying it's

00:39:27.060 not a problem that a handful of apartments were taken over by Venezuelan gangs. And then he accused

00:39:33.800 her of nitpicking versus acknowledging that apartment takeovers by South American gangs is

00:39:39.260 something you should worry about. Really well done. Really well done. You know, if I'm going to be

00:39:47.940 honest about it, he did, he did a little bit of a magic trick there by changing a handful of problems

00:39:55.440 into a handful of apartment buildings. It's not the same. But in doing so, he pressed his point perfectly.

00:40:03.180 The point is, you shouldn't take this lightly, even if the mayor is. Like, it's still a big enough

00:40:11.260 deal that this is worthy of conversation. And it is. So just watching him handle that situation,

00:40:19.180 and then Raditz had to, at the end, put in her last little fact check. You know, she goes, 0.82

00:40:24.300 but they did not take over the city. Now, even J.D., I think he admitted during the interview

00:40:30.680 that there was some hyperbole involved in saying taking over the city. So Vance was not going to

00:40:37.160 support the point that they took over a city. He just said that was hyperbole. But, you know,

00:40:42.340 we're talking about some apartment buildings, and that's pretty big. If it's true. So great job

00:40:50.980 in handling the media there. Did you know that Democrats are going crazy about Elon Musk and not

00:40:58.720 in a good way? So a number of people are asking, thinking he should go to jail. I don't even know

00:41:04.640 for what. What would be the crime? So Hillary Clinton has said that Musk maybe needs to go to jail.

00:41:12.520 Hillary Clinton. Silicon Valley investor Robert McNamee called for Musk's arrest and said that it should

00:41:22.200 be a condition for getting government contracts should require him to moderate his speech.

00:41:27.480 So for the fact that his speech is not moderated, maybe he should go to jail or not get government

00:41:33.860 contracts. Robert Reich, the former Clinton Secretary of State, said Musk should be arrested for refusing

00:41:41.980 to censor other people. So he's not doing enough censorship on the X platform, so he should be arrested,

00:41:48.680 according to Robert Reich. And then Keith Olbermann, of course, batshit crazy Keith,

00:41:55.020 called for Musk to be deported. And all the federal contracts with his company is canceled.

00:42:04.140 Olbermann. The Democrats are crazy as shit. I mean, they're just batshit crazy. They can't even come up 1.00

00:42:13.380 with a crime. They're asking to jail the guy after he just did the greatest technical week of

00:42:22.460 innovation that anybody's ever done in the history of the United States. And all for the benefit of

00:42:28.360 humankind. And these assholes want to put him in jail. It's so pathetic. The Democrats have just 1.00

00:42:37.760 become completely pathetic. Anyway. Kamala Harris has a new racist plan. So she's not hiding anymore. 1.00

00:42:48.480 She's going full racist. And it involves providing... So it's a plan to get black voters on her side. 1.00

00:42:56.660 So it's a bunch of economic things targeted primarily at black voters. So she wants to give a million loans, 1.00

00:43:05.060 forgivable loans up to $20,000 for black entrepreneurs, and, quote, others who have

00:43:10.820 historically faced barriers. So in other words, not white men. So she wants to give... So if you're

00:43:17.200 poor and you're a white man, fuck you. You're a poor white man. Fuck you. Go die in the gutter 1.00

00:43:24.840 somewhere. Because the racist Kamala Harris has some good plans for people who are just as poor as you, 1.00

00:43:32.180 but they happen to have different colors. So she'll help them. But not you, you whitey. Go die in the gutter, 1.00

00:43:41.620 says the racist. And she would... Let's see. What else she would do? She would have a national health equity 1.00

00:43:49.900 initiative that would aim to address sickle cell disease, diabetes, mental health, prostate cancer, and other

00:43:55.380 health challenges that disproportionately impact black men. That one's good. That if there's one place 1.00

00:44:03.320 you should have equity, you should definitely have equity when it comes to health care. That's one

00:44:11.180 place where I'm all in. I'm all in on that. If black Americans have special, you know, some health care

00:44:18.580 risks in some categories. Yes. Yes. Go do that. So that's fair. Now, is it racist? Yes, but in a good 0.92

00:44:27.960 way. Is that a thing? Because, you know, the world is complicated. It's not like racism all bad,

00:44:37.780 racism all good. That's not true. This is purely racist because, you know, white people don't have

00:44:43.920 sickle cell and some of these special health impacts. But yeah, let's treat every patient

00:44:53.680 like they're unique. And if you can know something about them because of their genetic background,

00:44:58.700 that's part of what makes them unique. And let's get everybody some help. Absolutely. Totally on board

00:45:04.260 with that one. So that would be a case where in my... Because nobody's left behind, right? They're not

00:45:10.700 saying that if you're a white person, they're not going to check your prostate. If they decided 0.98

00:45:15.600 we're not going to check your prostate, if you're poor and you're white, I'm out. Just to be clear, 1.00

00:45:21.360 I'm not going to go to that level of racism. But if you want to make sure that people who are

00:45:26.720 different individuals with different situations are also treated as best they can, yes, full equity.

00:45:33.680 Give me all the equity you got. But how about this one? Legalizing recreational marijuana nationally

00:45:44.980 and creating opportunities for black Americans to succeed in the industry. Hmm. I know a white 1.00

00:45:53.000 American who once tried to open a weed business in California. And there were lots of obstacles

00:46:00.280 because it's actually a really hard business to get started. And he couldn't, he couldn't make it

00:46:06.000 through the red tape and the bureaucracy and the approvals and all that stuff. What's wrong with that

00:46:12.400 guy? Well, why can't he have a weed business? But if he were black, if he were black, he'd be in the weed 1.00

00:46:20.040 business. And that's fair how? Nope. Nope. You can go fix all the sickle cell anemia. 0.99

00:46:30.260 Please, please do. But no, this is just fucking racist. Everybody who is poor should have a shot 1.00

00:46:39.320 at everything that's better than being poor. No, this is just fucking racist. 1.00

00:46:45.980 Claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament. I've been visualizing my match all week. 0.99

00:46:50.820 She was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car on her backhand side.

00:46:55.760 Good thing Claudia's with Intact, the insurer with the largest network of auto service centers in the

00:47:01.860 country. Everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her way in a rental car in no time.

00:47:07.000 I made it to my tournament and lost in the first round. But you got there on time.

00:47:12.340 Intact Insurance, your auto service ace. Certain conditions apply.

00:47:15.820 How about this one? Harris would provide education, training and mentorship programs to help black men

00:47:22.980 get jobs in high demand industries. But she would target specifically teaching jobs.

00:47:28.180 What, there are no white men who could use a little mentoring and help to get a teaching job? 0.80

00:47:36.460 And why do you want to specifically target one group for one profession?

00:47:42.600 Why can't just everybody who needs a help get a little help?

00:47:45.960 This is purely racist. Purely racist. Now I will, but I'll make one small shift to this.

00:47:55.800 I do think that one of the biggest, I guess, systemic racism problems that I recognize besides

00:48:03.460 the school system is mentorship. Mentorship is a really big deal. If you happen to be lucky enough

00:48:12.300 to know a bunch of rich people, let's say your parents are doing well and they know other rich

00:48:16.500 people, that's a huge, huge advantage because you can get advice and you can get, you know,

00:48:24.040 connections and stuff. So if you could fix mentorship for the underserved people in the world, as long

00:48:30.880 as you're doing it for everybody, that would really be a big, that would be a really big bite out of

00:48:36.280 what I would agree is systemic racism. So for that, I'm all in. On mentorship, I think everybody

00:48:45.660 should get more. It's a fact that black Americans have less access. So a little extra effort. 0.67

00:48:53.120 I think that would be fair. But if you're, you know, spending money on things that everybody needs

00:49:02.320 and you're only allowing one group of people to get it, not so good, not so good. The thing about

00:49:08.580 mentorship is it doesn't cost anything. All right. One of the weird things I've told you a number of

00:49:14.600 times is that although I got canceled, I have and continue to mentor black individuals just because

00:49:24.040 they asked. It turns out the asking is a really good strategy. Who teaches this? There's somebody

00:49:33.040 very famous who recently has made a big deal about the fact that just asking, if you can learn to ask

00:49:41.360 knowing that you'll get turned down for a lot of stuff, you're going to get a lot of stuff.

00:49:45.640 So when somebody asks me for some kind of mentorship or advice or a connection or something,

00:49:52.840 I don't ask them their color. I don't ask them their politics. I don't say who you don't like

00:50:01.420 for president. I just say, you have something that you need. I have the answer to that question.

00:50:08.660 Why wouldn't I give it to you? Why wouldn't I? Of course I will. So when it comes to mentorship,

00:50:17.080 most of it should be free. And it's a gigantic disadvantage when you don't have it, white or 1.00

00:50:22.760 black. So I'm pretty liberal in giving it. So I'll give this advice. If you're black and you're 1.00

00:50:29.740 under mentored, it's probably the case. You should really just try asking some white people and some 0.98

00:50:36.080 brown people who have succeeded and some women who have succeeded. You're going to be amazed. 0.95

00:50:41.120 You're just going to be amazed how willing people are to help you out on an individual basis.

00:50:46.780 But if you go to somebody and say, can you do something for all the people who look like me?

00:50:52.480 Good luck. I'm not in on that at all. Not at all. But if you individually have something, sure.

00:50:59.940 Just ask. Trump is going off on

00:51:06.080 Kamala's brain. So I'm just going to read this because I love his writing. So this is a Trump

00:51:13.440 posting on truth. He said, quote, I believe it is very important that Kamala Harris pass a test on

00:51:19.000 cognitive stamina and agility. Her actions have led many to believe that there could be something

00:51:25.240 very wrong with her. Even 60 Minutes on CBS in order to protect Lion Kamala illegally and 0.96

00:51:33.440 unscrupulously replaced an answer she had given, which was totally bonkers with another answer that

00:51:39.860 had nothing to do with the question asked. Also, she is slow and lethargic 0.96

00:51:44.260 in answering even the easiest of questions. We just went through almost four years of that.

00:51:50.820 We shouldn't have to do it again. Oh, this is brilliant. It's brilliant. Now,

00:51:58.180 will she take a cognitive test? Of course not. Of course not. Will they fight back and say,

00:52:06.300 you're the one who's too old and should take a cognitive test? Of course they will.

00:52:10.820 But I love that he's injecting it into the conversation and saying that the evidence is clear

00:52:17.100 that she's got a cognitive deficit. Now, wasn't it, I need a fact check on this.

00:52:24.360 Did Harmeet Dillon say on Tucker Carlson that she remembers Kamala Harris from long ago 1.00

00:52:31.040 and that Kamala Harris didn't used to be stupid? Did that actually happen or did I imagine that? 1.00

00:52:38.240 Can you give me a fact check? So it would have been the Tucker Carlson conversation with Harmeet,

00:52:43.140 but I thought I saw like just a clip or a reference to it. So give me a fact check. I'm not sure of that.

00:52:49.880 But the funny thing is that I had that same experience.

00:52:55.040 Meaning that, let's say, I don't know, eight or 10 years ago, when I would see Kamala Harris in public,

00:53:02.460 like as a senator, I would say to myself, pretty good. Pretty good. Handled herself well. 1.00

00:53:08.420 And then I would see her at a hearing or something, and she'd be one of the attack dogs that the Democrats like. 1.00

00:53:15.220 And I'd say to myself, oh, you did some good questions there. You look tough, smart.

00:53:20.400 But then she runs for president, and she kind of looks like an idiot. 1.00

00:53:25.400 And I've been racking my brains and trying to figure out, was it me? 1.00

00:53:31.620 Was it me who just was fooled, but she's always been a moron? Or did something actually change? 1.00

00:53:39.900 Now, Trump is suggesting, by asking the question and asking for a cognitive test,

00:53:45.060 he's suggesting that something might have changed. And I'm on that page.

00:53:49.220 It could be substance abuse, which is what it looks like.

00:53:55.260 But it also looks like just some kind of cognitive decline.

00:54:01.640 And I mean that seriously. I don't mean that as, oh, say anything to make your candidate win.

00:54:08.020 And, you know, I'm pro-Trump. And I always say that whoever's against Trump has cognitive problems.

00:54:12.840 I don't. And I remind you, Joe Biden certainly had cognitive problems,

00:54:21.080 which I called out four years ago and was completely right. 1.00

00:54:28.580 Hillary Clinton has no cognitive problems whatsoever.

00:54:33.600 Not once did I suggest that she was not smart.

00:54:36.880 Not once did I suggest she had any kind of, you know, dementia.

00:54:41.460 Nor does she now.

00:54:44.160 I've never said it about Obama.

00:54:46.540 Clearly very smart.

00:54:48.200 Clearly does not have any dementia.

00:54:51.760 But I'm one for one on Joe Biden.

00:54:54.220 And I'm one of the ones who caught it as early as you could possibly catch it.

00:54:58.860 I'm catching something with her.

00:55:01.580 There's something.

00:55:03.460 I don't know what it is, but it's a mystery.

00:55:06.680 I would love to know if she used to be smart and isn't. 1.00

00:55:09.620 Or is it a substance abuse problem?

00:55:14.700 Or is it me?

00:55:17.680 Because remember, I can't rule out the possibility it's me. 0.99

00:55:20.840 It could be that I'm so deeply biased or maybe she was always dumb, 0.98

00:55:25.780 but she acted better back then because she had some notes or something. 0.98

00:55:28.580 I don't know.

00:55:29.020 I just don't know.

00:55:31.240 Somehow she became a senator. 0.95

00:55:33.980 So we all watched her try to run for president the first time, 0.69

00:55:37.620 where she was the first one that got kicked out of the primary.

00:55:42.100 What did her Senate races look like? 0.99

00:55:45.060 Was that just the California machine put her in office

00:55:48.000 and it didn't matter how she campaigned?

00:55:49.700 Did she ever act capable?

00:55:53.260 I'm very curious about that.

00:55:55.040 I really don't know.

00:55:56.900 But I love the fact that Trump is injecting that idea into our conversation.

00:56:03.620 Now, do you remember I've been telling you

00:56:06.840 that there's something I called an October surprise coming,

00:56:10.740 and I told you that I had some knowledge of it coming?

00:56:13.760 Well, today's the day I'm going to tell you what it is.

00:56:17.880 You've already seen it.

00:56:20.760 It's the polls.

00:56:22.420 The polls were going to change in the middle of October,

00:56:25.660 and you were going to be shocked

00:56:27.380 because nothing would happen that would make the polls change.

00:56:30.940 All it's going to be is a rethinking of who the likely voters are,

00:56:35.380 and once that's rejiggered, which is what's happening now,

00:56:39.160 it's going to make Harris look less competitive.

00:56:42.260 And it's going to happen suddenly.

00:56:44.260 It's going to be dramatic,

00:56:45.440 and it's going to change the conversation totally.

00:56:50.320 And it just happened.

00:56:54.100 So we got some new numbers coming out.

00:57:01.600 So according to, let's see, ABC and NBC,

00:57:06.360 if I said ABC and NBC,

00:57:08.920 what would you say about their support

00:57:11.180 for Democrats versus Republicans, ABC and NBC?

00:57:15.980 You would say, oh, those are the two friendliest networks

00:57:21.060 to Kamala Harris.

00:57:22.580 In fact, ABC is, you know, Martha Raddatz.

00:57:25.700 ABC is the last debate that people think was fixed.

00:57:32.200 So ABC News, the poll before this most recent one,

00:57:38.980 had Harris up by six.

00:57:41.700 Does that sound like that was true?

00:57:44.300 Does anybody believe that Harris was up by six last week?

00:57:49.020 Just last week?

00:57:50.860 Up by six?

00:57:53.500 Well, they just revised it, and now she's up by two,

00:57:56.080 which is probably the margin of error.

00:57:58.040 Do you think that anybody in the real world,

00:58:02.520 when nothing really happened,

00:58:04.340 do you think she really went from six to two?

00:58:07.260 No, of course not.

00:58:09.100 No, not in the real world.

00:58:12.000 No, they must have rejiggered

00:58:13.820 who the likely voters would be.

00:58:17.140 How about NBC?

00:58:18.920 NBC, until last week, had Harris up five.

00:58:23.120 Up five?

00:58:24.140 Do you believe that Harris was up five last week?

00:58:28.040 They just, they have a new poll now.

00:58:32.520 It's tied.

00:58:34.200 Now it's tied.

00:58:36.020 Do you think that in the normal world,

00:58:39.060 she went down five points in a week 0.94

00:58:41.220 when nothing really happened?

00:58:43.700 No, of course not.

00:58:44.800 Of course not.

00:58:45.480 Those are polls being rejiggered.

00:58:48.360 Now, the other thing I predicted

00:58:50.140 is that it wouldn't happen all at once.

00:58:53.160 There would be an obvious pattern to it.

00:58:56.600 So the pattern would be that

00:58:57.900 for the few months leading up to it,

00:59:00.760 everybody would be a little biased toward Harris.

00:59:06.480 And it would make it look like it's a close race

00:59:09.100 because everybody likes it to be a close race.

00:59:11.300 But even the pollsters who knew

00:59:13.360 that those poll numbers were maybe a little artificial

00:59:17.400 because of the assumptions they made

00:59:19.160 about who was going to vote,

00:59:20.780 they knew they were going to close toward the election day.

00:59:24.160 And the middle of October is when you do it

00:59:25.960 because you don't want to do it too soon,

00:59:27.640 but you don't want to do it too late.

00:59:29.020 The middle of October is just right.

00:59:31.500 So from the start,

00:59:33.560 I predicted that the pattern would be

00:59:36.060 the polls are really tight.

00:59:38.000 You can't tell who's going to win.

00:59:39.340 There'd be some, you know, outliers,

00:59:40.800 but basically all tight on average.

00:59:42.360 Then you need, here's the second part that I predicted.

00:59:48.480 You're going to need a couple of very pro-Harris polls

00:59:52.240 to reverse.

00:59:54.700 Somebody's got to go first.

00:59:56.720 If somebody doesn't go first,

00:59:58.860 the rest won't follow.

01:00:00.560 So it's got to be a name brand

01:00:02.220 or one or two big ones.

01:00:04.400 It just happened.

01:00:06.260 NBC and ABC, they went first. 0.79

01:00:08.580 So now they took the ridiculous numbers

01:00:11.640 and took it down to something closer 0.85

01:00:13.180 to a statistical tie.

01:00:15.620 Do you think they're done?

01:00:18.640 Do you think that that's now reality

01:00:20.880 that they took it from Harris way ahead,

01:00:23.920 winning easily, down to a tie?

01:00:27.380 Do you think they're done adjusting?

01:00:31.460 No, they're not.

01:00:32.460 So what you should see

01:00:35.500 is what I'm calling the Kamala collapse.

01:00:39.380 So you're going to see

01:00:40.500 a complete collapse of the polling.

01:00:42.860 And it's not really a change.

01:00:44.820 It's just they're adjusting it closer to reality

01:00:47.360 because they have to

01:00:48.080 when it gets to the actual end.

01:00:50.140 And here it is.

01:00:53.660 It's exactly on schedule.

01:00:56.020 It's like right on schedule.

01:00:58.100 You could have predicted this six months ago.

01:01:00.320 I mean, she wasn't the candidate six months ago.

01:01:02.460 But you could have predicted

01:01:03.600 that whoever was the candidate,

01:01:05.420 it would be close, close, close

01:01:07.280 until October.

01:01:09.400 And then you would see this pattern.

01:01:11.740 Now, Biden was a special case

01:01:13.940 because we've never seen anybody

01:01:16.080 lose a debate the way he lost the debate.

01:01:18.960 So his numbers would not have been close

01:01:21.140 even in the summer.

01:01:23.460 You know, August would have been a route

01:01:25.160 and, you know, there's no way

01:01:26.960 it would have been close.

01:01:28.080 So he was sort of a wild card.

01:01:29.880 But the moment they took him out

01:01:31.400 and put in something

01:01:32.360 that's sort of like a normal person to run,

01:01:35.540 immediately it did the thing

01:01:36.920 it's supposed to do,

01:01:37.660 which, oh, they're tied.

01:01:39.340 Oh, Harris is a little bit ahead, actually.

01:01:41.180 A little bit ahead.

01:01:41.880 So give us money.

01:01:42.600 How much fundraising would Harris do

01:01:46.040 if she had always been shown as behind?

01:01:50.900 It'd be hard.

01:01:52.420 Why would you give money to that?

01:01:53.840 But if they show that it's a horse race

01:01:56.820 and it's tie,

01:01:58.140 then you really think

01:01:59.260 your money is going to make a difference.

01:02:01.020 If you're the billionaire

01:02:02.080 who can give $20 million to a pack

01:02:04.920 and it looks like it's a tie,

01:02:08.460 you're going to say to yourself,

01:02:09.540 you know,

01:02:10.400 my $20 million

01:02:12.100 could easily be the difference in this race.

01:02:15.900 And then you open up the wallet.

01:02:17.560 But if the race is a route,

01:02:20.580 why would you give money?

01:02:22.520 It has to be close to give money.

01:02:25.220 It has to be close

01:02:26.280 to even bother running commercials

01:02:27.740 on the news networks.

01:02:29.660 So making it close

01:02:31.060 is sort of so important

01:02:32.980 for the whole system

01:02:34.640 that all the biases are there

01:02:37.340 to just force it to look close

01:02:38.960 when it really maybe isn't.

01:02:41.920 All right.

01:02:43.040 Here's some more hints

01:02:44.200 about the Kamala collapse.

01:02:45.800 I told you about this,

01:02:47.320 but Michael Tracy,

01:02:48.480 independent journalist,

01:02:51.000 said that Kamala Harris's

01:02:53.100 Univision crowd

01:02:54.160 was half-rent-a-crowd,

01:02:56.380 meaning literally a company goes out

01:02:58.340 and pays people

01:02:59.360 to be attendees

01:03:00.980 at different audiences.

01:03:02.380 So half of it was paid

01:03:04.060 and half was flown in

01:03:06.060 because they were supporters.

01:03:10.500 They were supposed to be undecided,

01:03:13.620 but I think they got

01:03:14.980 very few undecideds, if any.

01:03:19.680 Then, of course,

01:03:20.500 they've got Tim Walsh

01:03:21.720 going out trying to pretend

01:03:23.460 to be a real man

01:03:24.360 and completely failing at it.

01:03:28.020 The people who know guns

01:03:29.260 better than I do

01:03:30.040 say he was awkward

01:03:31.300 with his gun stuff

01:03:33.180 and he looked like

01:03:34.260 he just bought his hunting clothes

01:03:35.800 that morning

01:03:36.380 and all kinds of things

01:03:38.200 that didn't make it look

01:03:39.200 as manly as it was supposed to.

01:03:40.620 And Scott Jennings

01:03:44.480 on CNN

01:03:45.100 put it this way,

01:03:46.920 that Tim Walsh

01:03:48.040 was doing hunting cosplay.

01:03:50.920 Cosplay,

01:03:51.500 where you're just pretending

01:03:52.360 to be a character.

01:03:53.860 He goes,

01:03:54.120 Tim Walsh is doing hunting cosplay

01:03:55.560 and cringy videos

01:03:56.820 that are not helping with men.

01:03:58.780 I'm going to go further

01:04:00.220 and I'm going to say

01:04:01.840 if you look at the way

01:04:02.980 the Democrats

01:04:03.960 very publicly,

01:04:06.160 they said they were going

01:04:07.320 to try to woo men

01:04:08.320 and then they showed

01:04:10.500 that they don't even know

01:04:11.680 what men are.

01:04:14.660 Apparently,

01:04:15.300 there are so few people

01:04:16.760 with influence

01:04:17.600 who are men,

01:04:19.300 I'll say heterosexual men 0.94

01:04:20.800 because that's what

01:04:21.320 they were targeting,

01:04:22.680 that they didn't even know

01:04:24.100 how to get one of them

01:04:25.520 to pretend to be one.

01:04:26.600 Wouldn't you love

01:04:28.480 to have been in those meetings?

01:04:30.280 All right,

01:04:30.800 Tim,

01:04:31.720 we've got a problem with men, 0.65

01:04:32.940 we need to woo some men. 0.98

01:04:35.080 He goes,

01:04:35.320 well, 0.97

01:04:35.440 we've got all the gay men, 0.95

01:04:37.020 you know, 0.96

01:04:37.220 or most of them.

01:04:39.560 We're working on Richard Grinnell,

01:04:41.200 but we think we have

01:04:41.800 most of the gay men. 0.69

01:04:43.880 Scott Pressler, 0.97

01:04:44.780 no,

01:04:45.240 we don't have him,

01:04:46.440 but we'll work on him too.

01:04:48.000 But we think we have 0.57

01:04:48.900 most of the gay men. 0.51

01:04:51.020 So, 0.96

01:04:51.580 how can we woo

01:04:52.400 the,

01:04:53.520 how can we woo

01:04:54.860 the heteros?

01:04:55.740 and like,

01:04:56.940 anybody have any ideas?

01:04:58.120 And somebody's like,

01:04:59.040 I've got it.

01:05:01.100 Monster trucks.

01:05:03.060 No,

01:05:03.480 two,

01:05:03.720 two on the nose, 0.78

01:05:04.740 two on the nose. 0.94

01:05:06.400 How about 0.99

01:05:07.000 shooting things? 1.00

01:05:09.800 Shooting things. 0.68

01:05:10.520 They like to shoot things. 0.56

01:05:11.860 Yes.

01:05:13.000 Yes.

01:05:13.820 We're going to have our guy 0.96

01:05:14.780 go out and shoot something. 0.79

01:05:17.200 But, 0.94

01:05:17.860 oh,

01:05:18.160 hold on,

01:05:18.700 hold on.

01:05:19.100 You have your hand up?

01:05:20.560 I'm a vegetarian.

01:05:21.560 Oh.

01:05:22.840 Oh.

01:05:24.500 Okay.

01:05:25.100 Well, 0.99

01:05:25.640 he needs to shoot something, 0.98

01:05:26.980 but we don't want to see him 0.99

01:05:27.880 shooting something.

01:05:29.420 How about he just goes

01:05:30.440 into the forest

01:05:31.220 with a gun,

01:05:32.460 loads it,

01:05:33.200 and then we don't see him

01:05:34.360 shoot anything

01:05:35.080 because we don't want to see 0.99

01:05:36.740 any dead stuff.

01:05:38.180 Too manly?

01:05:40.240 Perfect.

01:05:42.660 You can just imagine

01:05:43.860 what that conversation

01:05:44.900 looked like

01:05:45.540 with no actual

01:05:46.940 men consulting.

01:05:48.580 It must have been hilarious.

01:05:50.060 I would love

01:05:51.520 to have the recording

01:05:52.340 of that meeting

01:05:53.040 of how they were

01:05:54.140 pretending to be men.

01:05:56.060 And then they look around

01:05:56.940 and they go,

01:05:57.520 okay,

01:05:58.500 how about

01:05:58.920 we just look at

01:06:00.300 some of our

01:06:00.920 actual heterosexual

01:06:02.120 male Democrats

01:06:03.840 and we'll use them

01:06:05.100 as a model?

01:06:05.960 And they're like,

01:06:06.640 yes,

01:06:07.300 yes.

01:06:08.160 Who do we have?

01:06:09.760 James Carville.

01:06:12.180 No,

01:06:12.620 no,

01:06:12.820 no,

01:06:13.060 no,

01:06:13.240 no,

01:06:13.460 no.

01:06:13.780 Whoa.

01:06:16.260 I mean,

01:06:16.800 it must have been hilarious.

01:06:17.940 That's all I'm saying.

01:06:18.820 You can imagine it.

01:06:20.060 Yeah,

01:06:21.920 anyway.

01:06:23.080 When I found out

01:06:24.100 my friend got a great deal

01:06:25.520 on a wool coat

01:06:26.280 from Winners,

01:06:27.120 I started wondering,

01:06:28.800 is every fabulous item

01:06:30.400 I see from Winners?

01:06:31.880 Like that woman over there 1.00

01:06:33.180 with the designer jeans.

01:06:34.600 Are those from Winners?

01:06:36.160 Ooh,

01:06:36.780 or those beautiful gold earrings?

01:06:38.620 Did she pay full price?

01:06:39.940 Or that leather tote?

01:06:40.980 Or that cashmere sweater?

01:06:42.160 Or those knee-high boots?

01:06:43.640 That dress?

01:06:44.420 That jacket?

01:06:45.100 Those shoes?

01:06:46.120 Is anyone paying

01:06:47.320 full price for anything?

01:06:49.080 Stop wondering.

01:06:50.360 Start winning.

01:06:51.280 Winners find fabulous

01:06:52.540 for less.

01:06:55.680 I wasn't really following

01:06:57.100 the congressional races,

01:06:59.660 so according to The Hill,

01:07:01.740 the Senate race

01:07:02.860 will be close

01:07:03.640 in the sense of

01:07:04.480 who's controlling

01:07:05.460 the Senate

01:07:05.920 when we're done.

01:07:06.560 But The Hill thinks

01:07:08.200 that it's leaning GOP.

01:07:10.920 So if things went

01:07:12.000 the way we expect,

01:07:14.220 Republicans would

01:07:16.020 have control of the Senate.

01:07:17.720 Now,

01:07:18.200 is there a wild card

01:07:19.380 involved here?

01:07:20.100 Of course there is.

01:07:21.360 Because when The Hill

01:07:22.360 says it's leaning Republican,

01:07:25.180 they also are believing

01:07:27.860 their own polls.

01:07:28.800 So if Trump were to win

01:07:32.340 only as much

01:07:33.180 as the polls suggest

01:07:34.520 he will,

01:07:35.520 then it's going to be close,

01:07:37.140 but the GOP

01:07:38.160 might have a slight edge.

01:07:40.480 But what happens

01:07:41.640 if Trump dominates

01:07:44.100 the election? 0.99

01:07:44.780 Just kills.

01:07:45.700 Well, 0.76

01:07:47.600 usually

01:07:48.120 that drags along

01:07:50.120 a lot of undercard

01:07:51.620 people like senators

01:07:52.720 and representatives.

01:07:54.660 So if the polling 0.99

01:07:56.220 is bullshit 0.99

01:07:57.040 and the actual results 1.00

01:07:59.720 are Trump

01:08:00.320 just does a Reagan

01:08:02.120 and just controls

01:08:03.280 the whole electoral college,

01:08:05.440 the Senate

01:08:06.040 is going to go Republican.

01:08:07.700 I feel like

01:08:08.880 that's a likely outcome.

01:08:11.100 And I also think

01:08:11.740 it's likely

01:08:12.300 that Trump

01:08:13.440 will outperform.

01:08:14.660 So I'm going to say

01:08:15.680 the greatest,

01:08:17.540 I'd say two to one.

01:08:19.500 I'll go two to one.

01:08:22.240 Republicans take the Senate.

01:08:24.160 Two to one odds.

01:08:26.380 Then there's the House.

01:08:28.600 It's kind of weird

01:08:29.340 how often the House

01:08:30.980 and the Senate

01:08:31.540 change sides.

01:08:33.800 You would think

01:08:34.700 it wouldn't happen that much,

01:08:36.260 but it's kind of weird

01:08:37.040 that it happens often.

01:08:38.380 So the House

01:08:39.420 that's currently Republican

01:08:40.780 but barely

01:08:41.520 might go

01:08:43.220 slightly

01:08:45.040 they might go

01:08:48.020 slightly

01:08:48.420 in that direction.

01:08:51.180 But again,

01:08:52.320 the wild card

01:08:53.180 is Trump's performance.

01:08:55.420 So if Trump

01:08:55.960 performs amazingly,

01:08:58.200 then maybe

01:08:59.480 even the House

01:09:00.080 goes his way.

01:09:01.460 So there is

01:09:01.920 some possibility.

01:09:03.680 I don't think it's...

01:09:05.680 I give it

01:09:07.660 maybe a

01:09:08.260 55,

01:09:10.380 60% chance

01:09:11.600 that the Republicans

01:09:14.140 end up

01:09:14.940 having control

01:09:15.800 of the courts,

01:09:17.200 the Senate,

01:09:18.200 the House,

01:09:18.740 and the presidency.

01:09:20.580 It's possible.

01:09:22.500 60% chance.

01:09:24.800 And the 60% 0.99

01:09:25.880 is entirely based

01:09:27.240 on Trump

01:09:27.900 overperforming.

01:09:29.460 If Trump just

01:09:30.660 sort of,

01:09:31.420 you know,

01:09:31.880 barely squeaks

01:09:32.740 in a victory,

01:09:33.460 then,

01:09:33.800 well,

01:09:34.140 maybe not the House.

01:09:37.160 Right.

01:09:37.400 So my prediction

01:09:38.640 is Trump

01:09:39.580 dominant performance

01:09:41.000 takes the House,

01:09:43.080 takes the Senate,

01:09:44.280 and then he can

01:09:45.540 have his way

01:09:46.280 with the courts.

01:09:48.680 That's my take.

01:09:52.240 MSNBC

01:09:52.800 is worried

01:09:53.620 about Trump

01:09:54.660 presidency

01:09:55.200 and they say

01:09:56.660 they're alarmed

01:09:57.880 that the,

01:09:59.240 they might be

01:10:00.360 floating the idea

01:10:01.520 of having

01:10:03.240 Kash Patel

01:10:04.060 as the attorney

01:10:04.900 general

01:10:05.260 and

01:10:06.600 he is,

01:10:08.340 Kash Patel

01:10:08.860 has apparently

01:10:09.520 said that

01:10:10.120 we'd go out

01:10:10.700 and find

01:10:11.020 conspirators,

01:10:12.120 not just in the

01:10:12.640 government,

01:10:13.120 but in the media,

01:10:14.160 the people who

01:10:14.820 did bad things

01:10:15.720 in 2020,

01:10:16.640 allegedly,

01:10:17.460 and put them

01:10:18.640 in jail

01:10:19.000 going after them,

01:10:20.500 I guess.

01:10:21.820 Now,

01:10:22.800 I'm not in favor

01:10:24.680 of lawfare,

01:10:26.100 so I want to be

01:10:27.880 really clear

01:10:28.420 about that.

01:10:30.020 If Trump wins

01:10:31.540 and I see

01:10:33.160 even one example,

01:10:34.900 even one example

01:10:36.540 of them trying

01:10:37.900 to jail a,

01:10:39.580 let's say,

01:10:40.140 a member of the

01:10:40.780 media who's,

01:10:41.840 you know,

01:10:42.100 maybe biased,

01:10:42.860 but just doing

01:10:43.580 that biased media

01:10:44.640 thing,

01:10:45.460 I'm out.

01:10:48.100 I'm not going

01:10:48.920 to fight this

01:10:49.560 hard to get

01:10:51.360 a Trump

01:10:51.780 administration

01:10:52.280 to protect

01:10:53.280 the First

01:10:53.740 Amendment

01:10:54.120 and to protect

01:10:55.540 our rights

01:10:56.180 and let him

01:10:57.560 do the same

01:10:58.080 thing that we're

01:10:58.600 trying to prevent.

01:11:00.820 That's not going

01:11:01.640 to happen,

01:11:02.480 right?

01:11:02.740 If they go

01:11:03.760 full lawfare,

01:11:05.040 I am so out

01:11:06.420 and I'm going

01:11:07.640 to be out,

01:11:08.220 not violently,

01:11:09.300 but assertively,

01:11:10.820 I will be out

01:11:11.500 if they do that.

01:11:13.400 Now,

01:11:13.840 if they're putting

01:11:15.160 people who really

01:11:16.120 broke the law

01:11:17.060 in jail,

01:11:18.580 that's fine,

01:11:20.060 but you better

01:11:21.460 bring the goods.

01:11:22.380 It better not look

01:11:23.040 like lawfare to me.

01:11:24.780 It better not look

01:11:25.560 like a bunch of,

01:11:26.240 you know, 1.00

01:11:26.520 bullshit Soros 1.00

01:11:28.640 prosecutors. 1.00

01:11:29.380 I am nowhere

01:11:30.680 near being okay

01:11:31.600 with that,

01:11:32.520 just to be clear.

01:11:34.000 So whether it's

01:11:34.700 Kash Patel

01:11:35.380 or anybody else,

01:11:36.760 you better not.

01:11:38.420 You better not.

01:11:39.980 I'm not cool

01:11:40.840 with that.

01:11:42.020 You know,

01:11:42.300 I wouldn't even

01:11:43.160 want to be associated

01:11:43.960 with anybody

01:11:44.680 who had that

01:11:45.600 point of view.

01:11:49.020 So maybe all

01:11:50.100 you need is

01:11:50.600 truth and labeling.

01:11:53.920 Imagine you had

01:11:55.560 truth and labeling

01:11:56.420 for the news

01:11:57.460 organizations.

01:11:58.200 and you came up

01:12:00.780 with some

01:12:01.120 objective standard.

01:12:03.000 So let's say

01:12:03.460 the objective

01:12:04.040 standard was

01:12:04.900 the percentage

01:12:05.680 of time

01:12:06.400 that each

01:12:07.540 network spends,

01:12:08.440 let's say,

01:12:08.940 criticizing one

01:12:09.880 candidate

01:12:10.340 while praising

01:12:11.840 the other.

01:12:13.160 And let's just

01:12:13.740 say you said,

01:12:14.800 you know,

01:12:15.120 if it's 60-40,

01:12:18.040 that's okay.

01:12:20.360 You know,

01:12:20.640 you might be

01:12:21.340 trying to give

01:12:22.060 the news,

01:12:22.740 but you're a

01:12:23.180 little bit biased.

01:12:24.120 Bias is not 1.00

01:12:24.780 against the law

01:12:25.500 and you probably

01:12:27.020 don't even need

01:12:27.580 to label it.

01:12:29.000 But suppose,

01:12:30.320 like MSNBC,

01:12:31.940 it's 99%

01:12:33.460 negative in one

01:12:34.500 direction

01:12:34.880 and, you know,

01:12:36.720 99% positive

01:12:37.980 in the other

01:12:38.340 direction.

01:12:39.280 Is that news?

01:12:40.840 That's not news.

01:12:42.840 It's not even

01:12:43.540 close to news.

01:12:44.360 It's propaganda.

01:12:45.740 So if the

01:12:46.540 government did

01:12:47.180 a truth and

01:12:47.880 labeling where

01:12:49.260 they said,

01:12:49.920 if you're over,

01:12:50.780 I'll pick a 0.54

01:12:51.320 number,

01:12:51.680 if you're over

01:12:52.180 80% negative

01:12:54.340 to one side,

01:12:55.780 you know,

01:12:56.360 over the

01:12:56.820 course of

01:12:57.240 some extended

01:12:57.820 period,

01:12:58.620 you don't get

01:12:59.500 to call yourself

01:13:00.100 news.

01:13:01.600 You only get

01:13:02.580 to call yourself

01:13:03.300 propaganda.

01:13:04.420 Now,

01:13:05.000 I'm not sure

01:13:05.660 if my example

01:13:06.360 of how to

01:13:06.840 measure that

01:13:07.360 is a good

01:13:07.800 one,

01:13:08.260 but let's

01:13:09.000 say another

01:13:09.640 measure would

01:13:10.240 be the

01:13:11.300 frequency that

01:13:12.480 alternative views

01:13:13.680 are showcased.

01:13:14.760 when I turn

01:13:16.160 on CNN

01:13:16.700 and they've

01:13:17.580 got the

01:13:18.080 panel discussion,

01:13:20.140 they always

01:13:21.500 include Scott

01:13:22.340 Jennings

01:13:22.760 and the

01:13:24.820 other gentleman

01:13:25.360 whose name I

01:13:25.900 can't remember,

01:13:26.580 the shaved head

01:13:27.520 gentleman,

01:13:28.280 he's pretty good

01:13:28.820 as well,

01:13:29.460 and they do,

01:13:30.980 they have

01:13:31.720 complete time

01:13:32.760 to give the

01:13:33.940 opposing view.

01:13:35.400 Now,

01:13:35.920 if I were to

01:13:36.520 rate CNN,

01:13:37.640 I would say

01:13:38.480 biased,

01:13:39.500 but news,

01:13:41.100 but news,

01:13:42.440 because they're

01:13:43.220 showing both

01:13:43.660 sides.

01:13:44.500 Maybe they're

01:13:45.100 showing 60-40.

01:13:48.400 That's more

01:13:49.100 just human,

01:13:50.080 but they're

01:13:51.320 showing both

01:13:51.820 sides.

01:13:53.080 If you switch

01:13:54.080 to MSNBC,

01:13:55.140 you don't see

01:13:55.560 both sides.

01:13:57.920 That's more

01:13:58.580 like a 99-1

01:13:59.960 situation.

01:14:01.060 Do you think

01:14:01.520 that they should

01:14:02.000 both be called

01:14:02.660 news?

01:14:04.100 I don't think

01:14:04.980 so.

01:14:06.120 Now,

01:14:06.660 how about

01:14:06.980 Fox News?

01:14:09.140 Fox News

01:14:09.940 would be a

01:14:10.300 little more

01:14:10.580 interesting,

01:14:11.400 because if you

01:14:12.160 take the five,

01:14:12.920 for example,

01:14:13.340 they always

01:14:13.840 have the

01:14:14.620 one Democrat,

01:14:16.980 Jessica Tarlov,

01:14:18.400 or Harold

01:14:19.240 Ford Jr.,

01:14:20.620 and so you're

01:14:21.780 always going to

01:14:22.480 get,

01:14:23.200 on that opinion

01:14:24.600 program,

01:14:25.600 an opposing

01:14:27.640 view.

01:14:28.820 But it's very

01:14:29.860 slanted.

01:14:31.300 If you go to

01:14:31.860 Hannity,

01:14:32.460 you're not

01:14:32.900 necessarily going

01:14:33.560 to get it,

01:14:33.980 but to

01:14:34.900 Hannity's

01:14:35.500 credit,

01:14:36.780 this has to

01:14:37.680 be said,

01:14:38.600 Hannity doesn't 1.00

01:14:39.280 have a lot of

01:14:39.800 opposing views,

01:14:40.740 but he

01:14:41.900 invites them

01:14:42.640 all.

01:14:44.420 That counts.

01:14:46.120 They choose

01:14:46.880 not to go

01:14:47.340 on,

01:14:48.020 but he

01:14:48.360 invites them.

01:14:49.420 He invites

01:14:49.920 them.

01:14:50.220 He says it

01:14:50.700 publicly,

01:14:51.360 and he means

01:14:52.140 it,

01:14:52.420 and sometimes

01:14:53.000 they say

01:14:53.400 yes,

01:14:53.720 and he

01:14:53.940 puts them

01:14:54.240 on.

01:14:55.380 So I

01:14:56.040 don't feel

01:14:56.400 the same

01:14:56.760 about that

01:14:57.520 as I do

01:14:59.180 about somebody

01:14:59.740 who doesn't

01:15:00.120 invite anybody.

01:15:01.520 I mean,

01:15:01.820 that's different.

01:15:02.400 So I

01:15:04.100 think Fox

01:15:04.540 News would

01:15:04.920 be a little

01:15:05.200 more nuanced

01:15:05.900 because they

01:15:06.420 do a better

01:15:06.840 job of

01:15:07.460 separating the

01:15:08.220 news from

01:15:08.720 the opinion,

01:15:09.620 and then when

01:15:10.260 they do the

01:15:10.780 opinion,

01:15:11.300 they do

01:15:11.640 actually try

01:15:12.200 to get the

01:15:12.540 other opinion

01:15:13.020 on.

01:15:13.420 So CNN,

01:15:14.780 Fox News,

01:15:15.960 I would call

01:15:16.740 them both

01:15:17.140 news.

01:15:18.080 Very biased,

01:15:19.940 but news.

01:15:22.740 MSNBC,

01:15:23.500 not even

01:15:23.980 close.

01:15:25.240 Not even

01:15:25.700 close.

01:15:26.760 It's not in

01:15:27.540 the same

01:15:27.920 universe as a

01:15:28.960 news program.

01:15:30.720 And the fact,

01:15:31.260 if we had

01:15:32.040 truth in

01:15:32.540 labeling,

01:15:33.380 like we do

01:15:34.280 with banks,

01:15:35.080 like we do

01:15:35.520 with products,

01:15:36.340 like we do

01:15:36.760 on labels,

01:15:37.420 on boxes,

01:15:38.020 like we do

01:15:38.500 with cigarettes,

01:15:40.600 MSNBC should 0.86

01:15:41.560 just be labeled.

01:15:43.160 I don't need

01:15:43.980 to put anybody

01:15:44.480 in jail.

01:15:45.860 I have no

01:15:46.800 impulse for

01:15:47.440 that whatsoever.

01:15:49.460 No jail.

01:15:50.900 No.

01:15:51.740 Just label

01:15:52.300 it.

01:15:53.120 Label it

01:15:53.440 what it is.

01:15:57.180 All right.

01:15:58.840 Here's something

01:15:59.580 I did the

01:16:00.180 other day

01:16:00.660 that I came

01:16:01.980 to regret

01:16:02.540 right away.

01:16:04.220 So as you

01:16:05.000 know,

01:16:05.440 author,

01:16:06.820 I may have

01:16:07.740 his name

01:16:08.080 read,

01:16:08.660 Tahezy Coates.

01:16:10.760 I'm not

01:16:11.260 intentionally

01:16:12.400 mispronouncing

01:16:13.100 his name.

01:16:13.600 I just didn't

01:16:14.000 write it down

01:16:14.620 and it's a

01:16:16.080 hard one to

01:16:16.500 remember.

01:16:16.900 But you know

01:16:17.220 who I'm

01:16:17.400 talking about,

01:16:17.860 right?

01:16:18.520 Can you give

01:16:19.240 me his proper

01:16:19.920 name in the

01:16:20.480 comments and

01:16:21.340 I'll say it

01:16:21.820 correctly when

01:16:22.340 I see it.

01:16:23.500 Tahezy Coates?

01:16:25.440 Is that

01:16:25.880 close?

01:16:27.140 Anyway,

01:16:27.440 he's going

01:16:29.720 around and

01:16:30.200 he's got a

01:16:30.560 book and

01:16:31.160 it involves

01:16:33.000 Israel and

01:16:33.920 the Palestinians

01:16:34.720 and he

01:16:35.900 says some

01:16:36.420 things and

01:16:36.920 then people

01:16:37.340 get really

01:16:37.820 mad.

01:16:38.440 And I

01:16:38.660 saw him

01:16:38.940 say some

01:16:39.380 things and

01:16:40.460 then I

01:16:40.740 saw a

01:16:41.320 woman who 0.99

01:16:41.820 did a

01:16:42.220 very long,

01:16:44.040 very angry

01:16:44.860 takedown.

01:16:47.600 But what

01:16:49.900 I noticed

01:16:50.440 is that the

01:16:51.120 thing he

01:16:51.520 said, the

01:16:52.360 clip that

01:16:52.880 she was

01:16:53.220 responding to,

01:16:54.620 her response

01:16:55.660 didn't seem

01:16:56.400 to be a

01:16:56.820 response to

01:16:57.360 what he

01:16:57.560 said.

01:16:58.660 Now, I

01:16:59.800 wasn't

01:17:00.200 agreeing with

01:17:01.200 what he

01:17:01.520 said.

01:17:02.560 I simply

01:17:03.380 in the

01:17:03.680 comments

01:17:04.000 said that

01:17:05.160 your response

01:17:06.200 to him

01:17:06.500 doesn't

01:17:06.820 address his

01:17:07.340 point.

01:17:09.120 His point

01:17:10.020 was that

01:17:11.320 he could

01:17:12.180 understand

01:17:12.880 how if

01:17:14.000 you plopped

01:17:14.680 a young

01:17:15.320 kid into

01:17:16.040 the Palestinian

01:17:16.880 situation,

01:17:17.600 that they

01:17:18.720 could become

01:17:19.240 radicalized,

01:17:20.220 which I

01:17:21.360 completely

01:17:21.720 agree with.

01:17:22.920 Because you

01:17:23.560 could plop

01:17:24.080 anybody into

01:17:24.840 any situation

01:17:25.700 and they

01:17:26.580 would turn

01:17:27.040 into that

01:17:27.600 culture.

01:17:28.680 If you

01:17:29.240 took a

01:17:29.600 baby and

01:17:30.440 plopped

01:17:30.800 it into

01:17:31.240 the Hindu

01:17:31.960 world,

01:17:33.880 do you

01:17:34.140 think they'd

01:17:34.520 become a

01:17:34.920 Hindu? 0.90

01:17:36.080 Probably.

01:17:39.280 If you

01:17:39.920 take a

01:17:40.360 baby and

01:17:40.920 you plop

01:17:41.320 them into

01:17:41.720 a Christian

01:17:43.040 world,

01:17:44.000 are they

01:17:44.420 going to

01:17:44.720 be a

01:17:45.060 Christian? 0.80

01:17:46.560 Probably.

01:17:47.960 Probably.

01:17:48.980 If you

01:17:49.720 take a

01:17:50.120 kid and

01:17:50.480 you pop

01:17:50.860 them into

01:17:51.180 the

01:17:51.320 Palestinian

01:17:51.880 situation

01:17:52.660 and they're

01:17:53.720 propagandized

01:17:55.320 the way

01:17:55.600 they are

01:17:56.060 and they

01:17:56.940 see roadblocks

01:17:58.920 that don't

01:17:59.340 apply to

01:17:59.800 the Israelis,

01:18:00.780 they don't

01:18:01.240 know the

01:18:01.520 whole story,

01:18:02.160 they don't

01:18:02.400 know the

01:18:02.660 history,

01:18:03.680 they see

01:18:04.220 that some

01:18:05.360 things are

01:18:05.720 happening to

01:18:06.160 them that

01:18:06.600 aren't

01:18:06.760 happening to

01:18:07.180 other people,

01:18:07.880 they don't

01:18:08.320 know the

01:18:08.620 history,

01:18:09.840 of course

01:18:10.300 they would

01:18:10.540 be

01:18:10.660 radicalized.

01:18:11.260 And he

01:18:12.220 said,

01:18:12.760 you know,

01:18:13.100 I'd like

01:18:13.560 to think

01:18:13.900 that I

01:18:14.200 wouldn't be

01:18:14.540 radicalized,

01:18:15.240 but honestly,

01:18:16.040 I might

01:18:16.460 be.

01:18:17.340 I completely

01:18:18.380 agree with

01:18:18.940 him on

01:18:19.380 that minor,

01:18:20.240 minor point.

01:18:21.180 I don't

01:18:21.780 know what

01:18:22.040 else he's

01:18:22.420 saying.

01:18:23.040 I'm not

01:18:23.660 taking a

01:18:24.120 side.

01:18:24.860 I'm just

01:18:25.500 saying that

01:18:25.980 this is a

01:18:26.920 common sense

01:18:27.580 point,

01:18:28.020 that young

01:18:28.980 people can

01:18:29.520 be radicalized

01:18:30.560 and socialized

01:18:31.980 and culturalized

01:18:33.100 without limit.

01:18:35.240 You can make

01:18:35.680 anybody into

01:18:36.220 anything.

01:18:37.140 Unfortunately,

01:18:38.040 anybody can

01:18:38.620 turn into

01:18:39.020 anything.

01:18:41.180 And so the

01:18:41.840 response was

01:18:42.740 more things

01:18:43.300 about he

01:18:44.040 doesn't

01:18:44.360 understand the

01:18:45.000 history,

01:18:45.660 he doesn't

01:18:46.060 understand that

01:18:46.920 Israel is just 1.00

01:18:48.020 protecting itself,

01:18:49.240 he doesn't

01:18:50.000 understand the

01:18:50.640 rights that they

01:18:51.260 have, and

01:18:51.820 blah, blah.

01:18:52.340 And I was

01:18:52.780 just pointing

01:18:53.180 out that while

01:18:54.860 all of those

01:18:55.580 things might

01:18:56.120 well be true,

01:18:57.440 they don't have

01:18:58.480 anything to do

01:18:59.060 with his

01:18:59.340 point, that if

01:19:01.000 you put somebody

01:19:01.640 in that situation,

01:19:02.640 they could get

01:19:03.940 radicalized pretty

01:19:04.740 easily.

01:19:05.740 So I

01:19:06.380 thought, well,

01:19:07.600 wouldn't it be

01:19:08.000 interesting for

01:19:08.700 me, just to

01:19:10.260 be useful, to

01:19:12.120 say, well, I

01:19:12.820 don't think your

01:19:13.320 response is

01:19:15.220 addressing his

01:19:16.020 narrow little

01:19:16.880 point he was

01:19:17.400 making.

01:19:18.460 How do you

01:19:19.060 think that went

01:19:19.600 for me?

01:19:21.360 Oh, my 1.00

01:19:22.120 fucking God, 1.00

01:19:23.140 did I get 1.00

01:19:23.560 attacked by

01:19:24.400 Jew supporters

01:19:27.380 and Israelis,

01:19:29.280 I guess.

01:19:30.080 Oh, my God,

01:19:31.280 it's the worst

01:19:31.820 I've been

01:19:32.120 attacked in, I

01:19:33.280 don't know, a

01:19:34.160 year at least.

01:19:34.920 And none

01:19:36.880 of it was

01:19:37.260 rational.

01:19:39.020 Because all

01:19:40.000 that mattered

01:19:40.460 is they didn't

01:19:41.060 like his

01:19:41.500 opinion on

01:19:42.340 other stuff.

01:19:44.040 And so if I

01:19:44.840 were to say

01:19:45.260 anything that

01:19:46.020 would be, in

01:19:46.860 their view,

01:19:47.340 supportive, you

01:19:48.800 know, I must 1.00

01:19:49.300 die, basically.

01:19:50.940 They didn't say 0.92

01:19:51.740 die.

01:19:52.540 But wow, the

01:19:54.300 amount of hate

01:19:55.160 that I got for

01:19:56.240 simply pointing

01:19:56.840 out that two

01:19:57.420 people were in

01:19:58.100 a different

01:19:58.480 conversation, that's

01:20:00.520 all I said.

01:20:01.160 you're just

01:20:02.140 not in the

01:20:02.460 same conversation.

01:20:04.360 And it was

01:20:05.360 ugly.

01:20:06.720 So I 0.97

01:20:10.040 immediately just

01:20:10.880 deleted it.

01:20:11.760 And I realized,

01:20:12.960 you know what?

01:20:13.900 I really don't 0.99

01:20:14.800 give a shit. 0.99

01:20:17.120 I don't give a 1.00

01:20:17.960 shit at all. 0.98

01:20:20.200 I should, 0.99

01:20:21.080 maybe.

01:20:22.120 But honestly, I

01:20:23.140 don't.

01:20:23.980 Because the

01:20:24.580 world's a big

01:20:25.060 place.

01:20:25.440 And there are

01:20:25.900 people suffering

01:20:26.680 and doing terrible

01:20:27.460 things all over

01:20:29.060 the place, to

01:20:30.980 each other,

01:20:32.340 reciprocating.

01:20:33.780 Sometimes they

01:20:34.300 have reasons,

01:20:35.240 sometimes they

01:20:35.980 don't.

01:20:36.920 I can't fix the

01:20:37.720 whole world.

01:20:39.940 So I guess my

01:20:40.940 take is that,

01:20:42.020 you know what?

01:20:43.060 If you're going

01:20:43.780 to be a complete 1.00

01:20:44.720 asshole to me, 1.00

01:20:46.920 simply for making 0.91

01:20:47.800 a point that two

01:20:48.640 people were on

01:20:49.340 different subjects,

01:20:50.780 I am so out.

01:20:53.100 So Israel, 0.99

01:20:54.760 you could go 1.00

01:20:56.000 fuck yourself 1.00

01:20:56.740 with all of 1.00

01:20:57.800 your supporters.

01:20:58.420 because if

01:20:59.720 even just

01:21:00.260 making a

01:21:00.880 common little

01:21:01.740 point about

01:21:02.940 the conversation

01:21:03.820 is going to

01:21:05.080 make me

01:21:05.520 completely

01:21:06.140 attacked.

01:21:07.160 And remember,

01:21:07.620 the ADL has

01:21:08.260 already called

01:21:08.700 me a Holocaust

01:21:09.560 supporter,

01:21:10.280 which of course

01:21:10.880 is not true.

01:21:12.360 I mean, 0.99

01:21:12.880 Jesus fucking 1.00

01:21:13.840 Christ, 1.00

01:21:14.440 guys.

01:21:15.840 Can you give

01:21:16.620 me a little

01:21:16.960 break?

01:21:17.940 So I'm

01:21:18.800 out.

01:21:19.980 Right?

01:21:20.520 Now, of

01:21:21.120 course, Israel

01:21:22.200 is an ally,

01:21:23.360 so I'm in

01:21:24.980 favor of

01:21:25.640 treating allies

01:21:26.640 like allies.

01:21:27.240 But I'm

01:21:29.000 not in your

01:21:29.440 conversation

01:21:30.000 anymore.

01:21:31.040 I am out.

01:21:32.460 I'm out.

01:21:33.480 If you're

01:21:34.160 worried that

01:21:34.680 the Palestinian

01:21:37.580 protesters are

01:21:39.640 going too far

01:21:40.540 and it's bad

01:21:41.240 for you,

01:21:41.860 I agree with

01:21:42.580 you, and I'm

01:21:43.420 out.

01:21:44.460 I agree with

01:21:45.380 you, but

01:21:46.400 apparently I can't

01:21:47.500 talk on this

01:21:48.080 topic because

01:21:49.420 you're going to

01:21:49.780 attack me.

01:21:50.880 So if you're 0.67

01:21:51.720 going to attack

01:21:52.060 me, I'm so 0.99

01:21:53.600 fucking out. 0.97

01:21:54.400 right? 0.99

01:21:55.320 You're on

01:21:55.640 your own

01:21:55.940 now.

01:21:57.340 On your

01:21:58.040 own.

01:21:59.400 So if you

01:21:59.860 can fix

01:22:00.320 that, maybe

01:22:00.980 I'll get

01:22:01.260 back in the

01:22:01.700 conversation.

01:22:02.820 But if all

01:22:03.480 you have is

01:22:04.140 hate for

01:22:05.280 anybody who

01:22:05.900 has any

01:22:06.360 point of

01:22:06.820 view on

01:22:07.180 anything on

01:22:07.780 this topic,

01:22:08.540 you can

01:22:09.280 have your

01:22:09.620 own points

01:22:10.040 of view

01:22:10.340 and you're

01:22:10.660 welcome to

01:22:11.140 it, and

01:22:11.560 I'm out.

01:22:14.140 So don't

01:22:14.700 look for any

01:22:15.220 support from

01:22:16.620 me publicly.

01:22:18.960 Privately, of

01:22:19.580 course, I'll

01:22:19.920 have my

01:22:20.260 opinions, but

01:22:20.980 publicly, you're

01:22:22.720 on your own,

01:22:23.180 Israel.

01:22:24.760 All right.

01:22:26.560 Now, of

01:22:27.140 course, Israel,

01:22:28.480 my haters will

01:22:29.760 interpret that as

01:22:30.600 I just became a 0.81

01:22:31.520 Palestinian terrorist, 0.79

01:22:32.720 which is my 0.99

01:22:33.920 point.

01:22:35.160 That's my

01:22:35.800 point.

01:22:37.200 So maybe

01:22:38.020 clean up that

01:22:38.720 situation and

01:22:39.440 you can get a

01:22:40.000 little more

01:22:40.280 support.

01:22:41.860 All right,

01:22:42.520 that's all I

01:22:42.940 got for now.

01:22:43.920 I'm going to

01:22:44.380 go talk to the

01:22:45.060 locals people

01:22:45.820 privately.

01:22:47.180 I heard James

01:22:48.100 Carville did

01:22:48.760 quite a screed,

01:22:50.720 but I haven't

01:22:51.040 heard it yet.

01:22:52.320 I'll go listen

01:22:53.100 to Carville's

01:22:53.760 rant.

01:22:54.140 It sounds

01:22:54.400 like it's

01:22:54.740 going to be

01:22:54.980 good.

01:22:55.860 All right,

01:22:56.240 everybody.

01:22:58.400 Let's hope

01:22:59.020 that the war

01:22:59.720 in Israel

01:23:00.400 and Iran

01:23:00.800 doesn't kill

01:23:01.340 the United

01:23:01.700 States, and

01:23:03.460 we'll get

01:23:04.000 back to work.

01:23:06.260 I'm going to

01:23:06.600 say hi to

01:23:07.240 the locals

01:23:07.840 people and

01:23:08.660 bye to

01:23:09.240 YouTube and

01:23:10.100 Rumble and

01:23:11.200 X.

01:23:11.820 Thanks for

01:23:12.340 joining.

01:23:13.080 out.

01:23:16.020 Bye.

01:23:17.140 Bye.

01:23:18.000 Bye.

01:23:18.260 Bye.

01:23:18.740 Bye.

01:23:19.300 Bye.

01:23:19.660 Bye.

01:23:19.980 Bye.

01:23:21.040 Bye.

01:23:21.340 Bye.

01:23:21.640 Bye.

01:23:22.100 Bye.

01:23:22.540 Bye.

01:23:23.000 Bye.

01:23:23.100 Bye.

01:23:23.740 Bye.

01:23:28.240 Bye.

01:23:28.260 Bye.

01:23:30.200 Bye.

01:23:30.420 Bye.

01:23:30.720 Bye.

01:23:30.780 Bye.

01:23:31.860 Bye.

01:23:34.380 Bye.

01:23:34.700 Bye.

01:23:35.480 Bye.

01:23:35.580 Bye.

01:23:36.380 Bye.

01:23:37.020 Bye.

01:23:37.720 Bye.

01:23:38.060 Bye.

01:23:38.380 Bye.

01:23:38.860 Bye.

01:23:39.400 Bye.

01:23:39.540 Bye.

01:23:39.960 Bye.

01:23:40.180 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 14, 2024

Episode 2628 CWSA 10⧸14⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript