Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 14, 2024


Episode 2628 CWSA 10⧸14⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 23 minutes

Words per Minute

146.33418

Word Count

12,247

Sentence Count

927

Misogynist Sentences

27

Hate Speech Sentences

30


Summary

In this episode of the show, Scott Adams talks about how artificial intelligence is going to change the way we live and work in the future, and what it means for the future of the world. Plus, a story about a man who thinks he's an AI training module, and a guy who can't figure out why he has so many problems.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 today. Well, we've got a show.
00:00:03.920 You might actually want to see it.
00:00:06.920 Hold on, hold on.
00:00:13.140 All right, I can make this work.
00:00:22.000 There we go.
00:00:30.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Human Civilization. It's called
00:00:39.620 Coffee with Scott Adams, and I can assure you that you've never had a better time in
00:00:44.280 your whole life. But if you'd like to take this up to levels that nobody can even comprehend
00:00:49.820 with their shiny, tiny human brains, all you need is a cupper, mugger, a glass of tanker
00:00:54.260 gels, a stein, a canteen jug, or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite
00:00:58.780 liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine
00:01:03.180 at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous
00:01:07.600 sip, and it happens now.
00:01:15.360 Oh, my goodness. I'm seeing in the comments a sign from Berkeley that says,
00:01:21.240 Conservatives welcome. Is there an official Berkeley statement that they're welcoming
00:01:28.340 conservatives? That's not true. It's not even close to true that they're welcoming
00:01:35.500 conservatives. It's ridiculous.
00:01:38.940 Well, the top of the news, according to Science Alert, drinking caffeine may reduce your Alzheimer's
00:01:44.280 clumps. Yeah, if you've got some clumps in your head and you put enough coffee in there,
00:01:51.780 the coffee will remove your Alzheimer's clumps. I feel like I've got a little clump forming,
00:01:58.800 so if you don't mind, then I'm going to take one more sip to see if I can declump that so
00:02:04.820 the show is that much better.
00:02:10.680 I think it's working. Yeah, yeah, I feel the clump going away.
00:02:16.860 Excellent. All right, here's your simulation thought for the day. This is going to ruin your
00:02:25.120 whole day. Here's what's going to happen. AI is going to train on everything in the real world.
00:02:33.800 So it's going to suck up the entire internet, already has. Then it's going to learn from robots
00:02:40.440 who are doing real things. So as the robots are learning how to do things, the other robots will
00:02:46.080 get that knowledge and then they'll all be able to do things. However, between the times that AI
00:02:52.800 has sucked up everything that's on the internet and the time that there are enough robots operating
00:02:58.140 in the real world just like their people, there's going to be this period where the AI is going to
00:03:03.280 be trained on artificial worlds. In other words, the AI will create an imaginary world and then it will
00:03:13.840 observe the imaginary world to learn things for the real world. How many imaginary worlds will each
00:03:22.400 AI platform form in order to train itself? The answer is more than one. So every AI that's based in the
00:03:35.460 real world will be creating probably multiple AIs just to train itself. So for example, it might train
00:03:44.560 an AI about a guy who lives in the real world, but he doesn't really, he thinks he does. He thinks he's
00:03:51.840 a cartoonist and he thinks he has one water leak related problem after another for his entire life and
00:03:59.280 can't get over the fact that it's such a bad coincidence. For example, right now my neighbors are saying,
00:04:06.880 is there some reason that this stream of water is running from your property down the road?
00:04:10.880 To which I say, hmm, I guess that will be number 1,625 things that I will have to look into to find
00:04:20.080 out about my water leak problems. Could it be that I am an artificial training module who is supposed to
00:04:28.480 live something like a normal life except it's peppered with continuous problems in just a few different
00:04:35.040 domains? I have a few other patterns like the water thing where there's something that happens to me
00:04:41.280 over and over, just my entire life, just to me, over and over. And as soon as one part is done,
00:04:48.000 a new part will jump in to replace it. Now that can't be a coincidence. It really can't be. There's
00:04:54.800 just no way that these are coincidences. So for the longest time, I've been under the impression that I'm
00:05:01.600 a training module. But I never thought I was training AI. I always assumed I was training just people
00:05:08.400 in another realm. But it makes far more sense since we know our AI will create the training modules.
00:05:16.880 The odds are that we're a training module. Or the odds are that I'm a training module and
00:05:23.520 you might be NPCs. I don't know. Or there could be one big fake world, but then the individuals are
00:05:30.400 placed into it in artificial situations that they can spot. So I will add to the thing that
00:05:39.440 Elon Musk says often that if you're going to create even one artificial world, you'll probably create more
00:05:46.400 than one. So the number of artificial ones that think they're real will definitely, a far out number,
00:05:54.480 maybe a billion to one, the number that are real.
00:05:57.040 Did you know there's a report from No Ridge, no with a K-N-O-W, that MIT engineers have figured out how to use
00:06:09.840 solar power for desalinization. Now you might say to yourself, Scott, I'm pretty sure they already know
00:06:18.080 how to use electricity to desalinate water. Duh! Well, here's what they did that's different.
00:06:24.800 They don't need a battery. Normally, if you're desalinating, you have to put a constant amount
00:06:30.560 of pressure to shoot the water through the filter usually, or whatever it is that they're using to
00:06:36.320 desalinate. But the MIT engineers found a way to moderate how much energy is going into the
00:06:43.040 desalinization based on how much sun there is at any moment. And that gets rid of the need for battery
00:06:49.840 storage, which is a big, big, big, big, big deal. It means that you listen to this number.
00:06:58.960 So I saw a picture that looked like it was maybe like the size of the, I don't know, the back of a
00:07:04.640 small van or something. But I couldn't tell how much that was the active part of the equipment,
00:07:09.600 but it fit in there. So it's, you know, it's not as big as a building. It's something you can put in a
00:07:13.680 truck. And it made 5,000 liters, I think. Where's that number? It made 5,000 liters of clean water in
00:07:23.920 one day, even as the weather was changing. So it wasn't always sunny, and it wasn't always daytime.
00:07:31.200 And it still made 5,000 liters of clean water in one day. That feels like a lot of water, isn't it?
00:07:37.600 Like, how much would you need to take a shower? How many liters? I don't know. It's hard to put that
00:07:44.720 in perspective. Anyway, did you know that there's a new university in America that's sort of anti-woke
00:07:52.880 and some billionaires are funding it? So in Austin, the University of Austin is brand new.
00:08:00.000 Well, brand new. November 2021 has started. It's got a couple of big billionaires behind it. It's got
00:08:05.920 Harlan Crow and Jeff Yass. And it's small. It's only got 92 kids in it, but it's growing.
00:08:15.920 So here, the free market is doing the free market thing. So there's actually a college you could go
00:08:22.000 to now without all the woke garbage. Will it work? I don't know. I still think that AI and robots are
00:08:31.600 going to be the new education system of the future. I don't think the idea of driving somewhere and
00:08:39.520 some big organizations in charge of your... I don't know if that model is going to work in the long run.
00:08:46.480 So anyway, you probably all know the story. Yesterday, Elon Musk's starship took off and
00:08:55.920 not only successfully took off and separated, which is what they were testing, but the hard part,
00:09:01.840 was the reusability. The reusability depends on this thing. I guess they can't do it the way the
00:09:09.920 other rockets do, which is simply to land, you know, standing up. For some reason, it can't do it.
00:09:15.680 I think it has to do with the size of the weight or something. So instead, Musk designed a gigantic set
00:09:23.760 of chopsticks. That's what he calls it. It's like two arms that are like chopsticks. And this gigantic
00:09:32.160 rocket falls down and these chopsticks grab it before it hits the ground. And you don't even
00:09:37.920 believe this could possibly work. It's the most ridiculously unlikely successful thing you've
00:09:44.960 ever seen in your life. Like I would have made a pretty big bet that that wouldn't work. There
00:09:52.080 it is. It's probably like a billion dollar bet that paid off. So I have to say that was one of
00:10:00.560 the most inspiring things I've seen. And I'm going to say what you're all thinking, but you don't want
00:10:06.320 to say it out loud because you're good people and you don't like to cause trouble.
00:10:09.760 Did you notice that we got the biggest, most impressive technical achievement out of the
00:10:19.120 company that's most famous for ignoring DEI?
00:10:21.600 Is that a coincidence?
00:10:28.480 It might be, it might be a coincidence, but it's hard to ignore that there's one person who's
00:10:34.880 the most vocal about being anti-woke and that that very same person's company did something
00:10:41.680 that we didn't even think could be done in America anymore because we don't have other companies doing
00:10:46.480 something that impressive anymore. So we just sort of thought, well, I guess we're done doing
00:10:50.400 impressive things. And then he does something that's so impressive, the entire world stopped
00:10:55.200 and said, wait, what are you doing over there? What?
00:10:57.440 Did you really just send an enormous rocket into space and then just catch it with giant chopsticks?
00:11:04.320 You did? My God, that is impressive. Now, I don't want to go too far and say that, yes,
00:11:12.800 it's because they ignore DEI. That's why they're successful. That's not, that's not in evidence.
00:11:18.480 That's not in evidence. I'm just saying it would be a weird coincidence if the person who's most famous
00:11:24.560 for being in favor of merit coincidentally had the best success. I mean, it could be a coincidence,
00:11:36.800 but I doubt it. I doubt it. By the way, I do think they probably do have some kind of DEI
00:11:45.440 efforts, but maybe they don't go crazy on it. Probably they do. Here's a stat from Evil Texan on X.
00:11:59.440 Did you know SpaceX has 13,000 employees and they're doing amazing things? And NASA has 42,000 employees
00:12:09.440 and your tax money is paying for it, unlike SpaceX. And so far, the 42,000 employees at NASA have managed also a success.
00:12:21.760 So they're both good. So SpaceX has put impossible rockets into space and rescued some astronauts.
00:12:30.640 And NASA with its 42,000 employees. Not to be outdone, they've launched a gay flag. So a gay flag.
00:12:40.560 So they've, they've matched the regular flag with a gay, gay flag.
00:12:47.520 And you know, it didn't launch itself, people. I mean, that flag didn't just get on that pole by itself.
00:12:55.520 That required NASA and its 42,000 employees. So good job, NASA, of raising a flag.
00:13:04.720 SpaceX halfway to Mars. Okay. Meanwhile, in a story that shouldn't be funny, but it is,
00:13:15.200 Bill Clinton went to McDonald's and he was being filmed from a short distance away, you know, just to see.
00:13:22.480 And the idea was, uh, apparently they were trying to see the reaction of the staff.
00:13:28.960 When Bill Clinton walks in and orders a hamburger,
00:13:32.240 imagine, just imagine what the ordinary staff would be there. They're just doing their McDonald's
00:13:36.960 job. It's like, Oh, would you like some fries? You know, you're, you know, would you like something
00:13:41.600 with that apple pie? And then the next customer that walks in is Bill Clinton, just by himself.
00:13:49.760 He walks up to the cashier and the cashier. Now, just so you can imagine it, it's not important to
00:13:55.040 the story, but just so you can visualize it. Imagine a, uh, maybe 20 something year old, uh, black woman.
00:14:06.240 And she looks up and she sees Bill Clinton standing on the other side of the cash register.
00:14:11.760 And she goes, Oh, Oh, Joe Biden.
00:14:20.560 And Bill Clinton had to introduce himself. Uh, no, I'm Bill Clinton. Well, then she was very impressed.
00:14:30.320 She, she did recognize that name and they, they got along great. Um, so that wasn't exactly what
00:14:38.960 they were planning on when Bill Clinton went to McDonald's, but it was still good. It was still fun.
00:14:44.880 So apparently Duke energy and his big solar farm in Florida, it's where they've got, you know,
00:14:50.240 gigantic number of, uh, solar panels on big fields. And, uh, I guess hurricane Milton or more specifically,
00:14:57.920 probably a tornado associated with it, just ripped a path right through the middle of it.
00:15:03.600 So one of the problems with solar panels is that a big wind storm will just rip them up.
00:15:12.640 I don't know. Is it, do you think that a nuclear power plant would have problems from wind or a
00:15:20.000 tornado? Would a tornado hurt a nuclear power plant? I feel like they would make sure that it wouldn't,
00:15:26.480 that that would be kind of basic to make sure that it was hardened against that. Um, but the,
00:15:33.120 the solar panels just got destroyed anyway. Um, so there's a report of a potential
00:15:41.680 third assassination attempt against Trump. Uh, but there was a little ambiguity this time
00:15:47.360 because the person who was captured didn't have guns with him, but he had guns in his car.
00:15:51.760 He, uh, apparently is a well-documented long time, uh, Trump supporter.
00:16:01.040 And there's evidence of it more than just him saying it. So he's, he's got a, uh, some girlfriend
00:16:06.640 type who says, I've been going to Trump events with him forever. He's a, he's a Trump supporter,
00:16:10.880 but the local police, um, local police sheriff said that because the guy showed up with multiple
00:16:19.200 passports, uh, in different names, he had an unregistered vehicle with a fake license plate.
00:16:24.480 He had loaded firearms in it. And, uh, apparently he had some, some fake way to get into the VIP section.
00:16:32.800 And the sheriff says, uh, if you're asking him right, right now, I probably did have W's
00:16:38.160 that prevented the third assassination attempt. So basically says, the sheriff says, we have a serious,
00:16:45.200 serious problem in this country, uh, because this is a common sense and reason. In other words,
00:16:51.600 the sheriff is saying that this guy was so sketchy in, in his behavior, not his thoughts.
00:16:58.720 We don't know what his thoughts were, but his behavior was so sketchy that to imagine it wasn't
00:17:05.760 that he wasn't up to something. No good is sort of unreasonable.
00:17:11.760 But from what I can tell, there's pretty good evidence. He's a Trump supporter.
00:17:17.120 So this one's a funny one. Um, I don't think I'm going to take the side of him being a assassin,
00:17:27.840 but anything's possible, right? Anything's possible. So I'm not going to rule it out,
00:17:33.520 but innocent until proven guilty. He has a history of being a Trump supporter.
00:17:39.360 And before that, apparently he was a Bernie guy. And I don't think the Bernie guy who becomes a Trump
00:17:46.400 supporter becomes an assassin unless there was mental illness involved. And apparently there wasn't.
00:17:53.600 But on the other hand, why does he need a unregistered car full of guns and fake passports with different
00:18:00.880 names? Well, uh, I'll just throw out a possibility that there are a lot of Trump supporters who say
00:18:10.720 things like, uh, I think Andrew Tate says this, that, uh, you should have multiple passports because
00:18:18.000 the country might not be safe. Meaning America might not be safe. So you might need a bug out country
00:18:24.160 or, or multiple bug out countries. He's not wrong about that. By the way, when, when Andrew Tate says,
00:18:30.880 maybe you should have some multiple passports just in case things go bad, wherever you are,
00:18:36.480 that feels like just sort of basic risk management. That's not crazy at all. I I'm not doing it myself,
00:18:43.200 but it's not crazy. So who knows? We'll find out maybe, uh, here's a reminder of something.
00:18:53.040 I did not know at the time. Maybe, uh, do you remember there was a case of the DC madam
00:18:59.760 and that there was some famous, um, madam of many prostitutes in DC and she got picked up,
00:19:07.920 arrested. And you said to yourself, uh, Oh, all the big names of the big politicians who use prostitutes
00:19:14.640 are going to come out, you know, like, like the Epstein list came out.
00:19:20.240 Well, more recently, like the ditty list came out. Oh wait, the ditty list didn't come out.
00:19:26.960 Oh wait, the Epstein list didn't come out. Oh wait, the DC madam list was never released.
00:19:35.200 Well, but at least, at least, you know, there's this, uh, uh, that in Congress,
00:19:42.880 I think the house, there's a fund for paying out with sex, sexual claims. So at least we've seen
00:19:50.000 the list of all the sec. Oh, no, we haven't. We haven't. So there are at least four different
00:19:56.000 lists of sex offenders of high level people that we know for sure exist. And we'll never see them.
00:20:08.400 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:20:12.880 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,
00:20:18.800 you're richer than you think. Now, here's something I don't remember happening in the news.
00:20:24.560 So give me a fact check. Um, did Alex Jones, what did the DC madam tell Alex Jones that she wasn't
00:20:34.400 suicidal and then soon after was found in a suicide? Is that a real thing that happened?
00:20:42.000 I don't remember how that situation resolved itself, if that's, if that's the right way to put it.
00:20:47.760 But is it true that the DC madam said in public to Alex Jones that she wasn't suicidal
00:20:55.440 and then committed suicide? Allegedly? Is that a real story? Or did somebody just some,
00:21:04.240 I'm seeing yeses in the comments. How did I not know that? Like I missed that entirely.
00:21:09.360 Wow. And did you know that people were trying to get the client list from that madam reveal,
00:21:17.040 uh, reversed or not reversed? People were trying to get it revealed, the client list. And, uh,
00:21:25.440 there was a judge who decided not to. So who was the name of the judge back in those days who blocked
00:21:32.400 the client list from being revealed? His name was, uh, Judge Merrick Garland. Have you heard of him?
00:21:38.720 He would be the current attorney general. And, uh, as Mike Ben says, who knows more about this stuff than
00:21:49.520 all of us put together, he says, uh, Garland is the mop up man. He's a career janitor on permanent
00:21:56.240 sweep duty for crimes of the intelligence state. Hmm. Huh. Now it makes you wonder, doesn't it?
00:22:04.880 If you were the, you know, allegedly some kind of deep state people and you wanted to make sure that
00:22:13.520 you didn't personally go to jail, what is the one job that you'd want to make sure you had your person
00:22:20.720 in? It'd be the attorney general, wouldn't it? You'd want to really, really make sure the attorney
00:22:26.960 general's on your side, no matter who the president is. It wouldn't matter who's, who's in office.
00:22:31.680 You'd really, really, really want to make sure the attorney general's not on the president's side,
00:22:39.760 you know, less by coincidence, but more on your side, whoever you are.
00:22:44.400 And I say that because, uh, Liz Harrington is talking about, uh, that in 2020, December, 2020,
00:22:52.840 a quote, irate Bill Barr called investigators looking into Jesse Morgan's claims of hundreds
00:22:58.760 of thousands of completed mail-in ballots hauled across state lines. And Bill Barr, um, told the
00:23:05.560 investigators to stand down and he was quite agitated. It is reported and told them to stand
00:23:13.400 down. Do you remember the reasons he gave for that? The reasons for standing down on what looked
00:23:18.840 like a very credible claim of massive election fraud. Do you remember the reasons?
00:23:27.560 I don't, I don't remember any reasons. And, you know, Liz doesn't mention any,
00:23:34.360 I don't remember seeing any in the news. Did he have reasons? What, why would you have reasons?
00:23:40.200 If the investigators thought that there was something that was reported by a, as far as they knew,
00:23:48.680 a credible citizen, and it was a report of the most major crime you can imagine. And then Bill
00:23:54.760 Barr was one of the ones who was, you know, quite certain that the election was fair. How could he
00:24:01.080 know that? There's one thing you can't know, whether the election was fair. But Bill Barr seemed to act
00:24:08.840 like he knew it. Don't you think Bill Barr would know? Because he's been around everything and he's
00:24:14.280 smart. Wouldn't he know that it is unknowable if somebody cheated and got away with it? The only
00:24:21.480 thing you'd know is that you didn't have proof from some court or something that maybe you believed. But
00:24:29.640 you can't know the election was good. That's not a thing. You can only know you didn't find anything.
00:24:35.400 So here's my question. Are all the attorney generals sort of deep state people and it wouldn't matter
00:24:49.160 who the president was? I kind of wonder. Maybe that's the one thing you have to control and then
00:24:56.520 everything else takes care of itself. I don't know. Let's talk about the propagandists, the propaganda
00:25:04.760 network, MSNBC. They like to bring in these crazy generals. So the anti-Trump people like to bring in
00:25:14.600 generals. The generals they bring in are the least impressive generals I've ever seen. If the only
00:25:20.680 thing I knew about the American military was the generals that go on TV and say things about Trump,
00:25:26.680 I would immediately attack the United States. After seeing like three or four of our best generals,
00:25:33.160 I don't know if they're the best, but see, if you see three or four of our generals go on TV
00:25:37.800 and talk about how Trump is a fascist, I would just say, oh my God, they don't have any leadership
00:25:43.880 there. Attack now. They all look incompetent. So MSNBC propaganda network has this retired major
00:25:51.080 general, Randy Manor. And he says, quote, you tell me if this sounds like a reasoned, tactical,
00:25:59.400 strategic, brilliant general, or in this case, a major general. Quote, President Trump is demonstrating
00:26:07.800 the attributes of fascism every single day. And every American that is supporting Trump right now
00:26:13.960 needs to understand that they are absolutely supporting fascism if they vote for Trump.
00:26:20.360 And of course, there were lots of reasons to back up that opinion, right?
00:26:28.360 He just looked crazy as shit. You just have to look at the major general, just look at his eyes,
00:26:34.280 look at his face. And if he doesn't look crazy, maybe it's just bias. But I mean, they just don't look
00:26:41.400 like they're playing on the same wavelength as other people. They just look like, oh my God,
00:26:48.200 you were in charge of people? Like, how could this person have been in charge of sending people into
00:26:55.320 battle? My God. Anyway. And then Joe Scarborough said, quote, talking about Trump, he says,
00:27:09.320 he thinks fear, he thinks loathing, he thinks darkness wins. How do you combat that? You combat
00:27:15.960 it with being defiant, but being joyful. Talking about Harris. She seemed to strike that tone last
00:27:22.520 night very well. Talking about Harris's rally in North Carolina. Yeah. So according to Joe Scarborough,
00:27:29.480 if you want to beat fear, loathing, and darkness, you should do it with joyfulness.
00:27:34.360 Well, I'd like to give a little persuasion lesson to you. Persuasion lesson number one.
00:27:43.080 Nothing that Joe Scarborough says is worth listening to. That's number one. Number two,
00:27:52.280 fear beats everything. Joyful doesn't be fear. No, fear beats joyful 100% of the time.
00:28:00.680 That's not even a fair fight. Joyful can be boring. Joyful could be, you know, somebody who's less
00:28:12.280 capable. Joyful could be somebody who has maybe better, a little bit better policies. So joyful is
00:28:20.520 not empty. Joyful can motivate, but not against fear.
00:28:29.320 So imagine you're, you know, there's a knock on the door and you think it's the Venezuelan gang coming
00:28:33.880 to get you. What are you going to do? Are you going to ramp up your joyfulness?
00:28:42.120 Well, it looks like I might be killed by the people on the other side of that door that they're knocking
00:28:47.960 hard trying to knock it down. It looks like they're all armed, as I point out, if I look out the window.
00:28:53.720 But if we ramp up the joy, I think we can counteract this. No, no. Joyfulness is not a response to fear.
00:29:02.680 Fear wins every time. Every time. So that's your persuasion lesson.
00:29:11.800 And it's also the reason that the, and keep in mind, Morning Joe just had a major general on
00:29:20.040 to scare Americans into thinking that Trump was the scariest fascist alive. And then the very next
00:29:27.800 opinion is, well, you know, joyfulness beats fear on the same network, same morning, the propaganda
00:29:35.800 network. It's so funny. But here's something you don't hear about on the news. And it takes people
00:29:41.800 like me to really point it out. Let's see if this works. So here's a picture. You can't see it, but it's
00:29:48.760 a picture of young Joe Scarborough. And I think I understand why he doesn't shave his head. Because
00:29:58.120 if he did, he would look exactly like one of those gray aliens that we keep thinking are kidnapping
00:30:03.880 people. Now, if you're only listening to this, you are not seeing the hilarious side-by-side pictures
00:30:10.120 of an alien and young Joe Scarborough. But trust me, you'd be laughing so hard right now.
00:30:18.840 All right, let me get back to where I need to be. Back on me, where we belong. Speaking of propaganda,
00:30:26.760 the headline in the Washington Post is, quote, Trump urges using military to handle
00:30:33.080 radical left lunatics on election day. You think that happened? It's in the Washington Post.
00:30:40.120 It's a paper of record. It's one of the newsmaking papers, one of the most respected institutions
00:30:45.560 in all of America. So do you think it's true that Trump urged using military to handle the
00:30:51.720 radical left lunatics? Of course not. Of course not. Did he say, quote,
00:31:00.120 quote, that if there were any trouble around election day, did he say, quote,
00:31:05.480 it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary,
00:31:11.720 by the military, because they can't let that happen? Does that sound like urging to use the
00:31:18.280 military against the radical left? Or does it sound like if it's a last resort, we can't have the
00:31:25.240 country torn apart. So you might have to do what you got to do.
00:31:31.720 I see Mike Burke coming in from the locals. Looks like we have a success. That only makes sense to
00:31:39.560 the people on locals. Yeah. So Trump saying that in the worst case scenario, you would have to do the
00:31:48.680 thing that nobody wants to do, which is use the military, which to me sounds like a normal person
00:31:54.680 talking in a normal way. Washington Post says he's urging the military to take care of these
00:32:02.040 radical left lunatics. No, that's not exactly what happened. It was sort of a last, last resort kind of
00:32:09.400 thing. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online
00:32:16.760 Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your
00:32:22.360 fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just
00:32:28.280 a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.
00:32:33.800 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane
00:32:39.000 moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots,
00:32:44.860 challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action,
00:32:50.000 all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold
00:32:54.680 at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600.
00:33:02.400 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply.
00:33:06.620 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:33:11.140 Did you know that Time Magazine is currently owned by, at least in part, by Mark Benioff,
00:33:17.800 the billionaire owner of and creator of Salesforce? And so that means it's left-leaning because Benioff is
00:33:25.620 a big Democrat supporter. But even he is not too happy that Kamala Harris refused an interview in
00:33:33.500 Time Magazine. And he said, quote, Harris declined repeated requests for an interview for this story.
00:33:40.040 So Time Magazine did a big feature story about Harris without getting to talk to her.
00:33:45.060 Now, Time Magazine isn't what it used to be. You know, it used to be one of the most respected news
00:33:50.560 entities. At the moment, it's a, it's a hollowed out, you know, gawker, Huffington Post kind of
00:33:56.920 situation. So it's not really what it used to be. But still, she, she did not do it. And then
00:34:02.900 Benioff says, in contrast, Trump talked about his policy vision with a Time reporter for 90 minutes
00:34:08.740 across two interviews. Okay, that is an unambiguous statement that said Trump is a better politician
00:34:16.500 in this specific regard than Harris. That's really clear. You know, I got to tell you that I think I
00:34:26.040 may have told you this story. I used to do a lot of public speaking. And I've only had one person who
00:34:33.700 hired me for public speaking, tell me that I did a bad job after I was done. It was Mark Benioff.
00:34:41.160 And by the way, he wasn't wrong. He wasn't wrong at all. Because I wasn't doing speaking when when
00:34:47.040 the request came in. And so I slapped something together. Because they they're, I guess their
00:34:52.000 speaker canceled. So the speaker, the speakers bureau said, Oh, we got to find somebody who can drive
00:34:58.420 there. Because, you know, it's too late to travel. And I live locally. So they said, you know, would
00:35:04.820 you do something on short notice? And I was like, Oh, I really don't want to, but they're going to pay
00:35:10.320 you a lot of money. I was like, Oh, how much? And they said this much. And I said, Really? And I said,
00:35:15.760 I'll be right there. So I hung out, hung out with Benioff before the event. And I have to say,
00:35:23.620 he's one of the most impressive people in person you'll ever meet. You know, sometimes you meet a
00:35:30.700 rich person, and you say, How did you get rich? It must have been luck. But you talk to Benioff,
00:35:36.160 he'd go, Oh, okay, I get it. I see how you got rich. Yeah, yeah, his philosophy, his whole mannerism,
00:35:42.180 his charisma, his intelligence, the whole thing is there. Like he's missing nothing. But one of the
00:35:48.400 things that he can do is he can, you know, invite me in to give a talk and then tell me it was bad
00:35:53.640 after it was done. And, and the thing was, he wasn't wrong. That's what I appreciated. It was the
00:36:01.340 worst, maybe, maybe the worst presentation I'd done since I started doing it years before that.
00:36:08.140 So he wasn't wrong. And here he is, you know, he's very clearly a Democrat, but his person who's on his
00:36:16.180 side, Harris, fucked up. She said no to Time Magazine for a big feature piece. And so he's
00:36:24.720 just saying, Okay, in public, you're, you're no, you're no Donald Trump. So the first thing you have
00:36:31.020 to know about Benioff is that he's the real deal. If you do something good, he'll say so if you do
00:36:39.140 something bad, he'll say so with the same level of candor. So I mean, it's not an accident that he's
00:36:45.620 a billionaire, not an accident. Anyway, J.D. Vance was talking to ABC's Martha Raddatz. And he is so
00:37:00.980 good at this. J.D. Vance is a really good pick, because he, he just really dominates the interview
00:37:08.240 situation. And that's not, it's not common, not everybody can do that. But so apparently,
00:37:14.420 the mayor of Aurora, Colorado was saying that the, the issue with the Venezuelan gangs was real. But it
00:37:23.400 was a handful of problems, and that they were all handled. So there wasn't a real problem that needed
00:37:30.100 to be addressed at a national level. There were some problems, they took care of it, we're all good
00:37:35.380 now. Now, Trump had been saying something closer to, you know, the gangs were taking over the city of
00:37:42.020 Aurora, and the mayor was disagreeing. So Martha, so Raddatz was taking the mayor's, I won't say she
00:37:52.360 took his side, although she did, but she was quoting him to say that Trump was exaggerating the thing.
00:38:00.980 Now, here's what J.D. did, which was a very clever reframe. No, that's too nice. It was a weaselly
00:38:13.340 thing he did, but he did it so well, I'm gonna, I'm gonna point it out. So Raddatz says, it's only a
00:38:19.820 handful of problems. So she's quoting the mayor, there were only a handful of problems. But the issue was,
00:38:26.820 were there apartment complexes, in which the gangs had basically taken control of the apartment
00:38:32.560 buildings. Now, when you hear the phrase from the mayor, that there were a handful of problems, does that
00:38:41.420 tell you that there were a handful of apartments taken over by gangs? Or were there a handful of problems, and it
00:38:48.540 wasn't, wasn't that they took over the whole building, but they might have been in the building, and they might have
00:38:53.740 been a problem, and then they took care of it. What do you hear? When I hear there were a handful
00:38:59.640 of problems, I don't hear they took over a handful of apartment buildings. Now, again, I wasn't there.
00:39:07.280 Maybe they did take over a handful of apartment buildings, and I don't know it. But that's not what
00:39:11.720 the statement was. It was a handful of problems. But J.D. says, and very cleverly goes, he said,
00:39:20.940 a handful of apartments. So he changed a handful of problems into, well, you know, you're saying it's
00:39:27.060 not a problem that a handful of apartments were taken over by Venezuelan gangs. And then he accused
00:39:33.800 her of nitpicking versus acknowledging that apartment takeovers by South American gangs is
00:39:39.260 something you should worry about. Really well done. Really well done. You know, if I'm going to be
00:39:47.940 honest about it, he did, he did a little bit of a magic trick there by changing a handful of problems
00:39:55.440 into a handful of apartment buildings. It's not the same. But in doing so, he pressed his point perfectly.
00:40:03.180 The point is, you shouldn't take this lightly, even if the mayor is. Like, it's still a big enough
00:40:11.260 deal that this is worthy of conversation. And it is. So just watching him handle that situation,
00:40:19.180 and then Raditz had to, at the end, put in her last little fact check. You know, she goes,
00:40:24.300 but they did not take over the city. Now, even J.D., I think he admitted during the interview
00:40:30.680 that there was some hyperbole involved in saying taking over the city. So Vance was not going to
00:40:37.160 support the point that they took over a city. He just said that was hyperbole. But, you know,
00:40:42.340 we're talking about some apartment buildings, and that's pretty big. If it's true. So great job
00:40:50.980 in handling the media there. Did you know that Democrats are going crazy about Elon Musk and not
00:40:58.720 in a good way? So a number of people are asking, thinking he should go to jail. I don't even know
00:41:04.640 for what. What would be the crime? So Hillary Clinton has said that Musk maybe needs to go to jail.
00:41:12.520 Hillary Clinton. Silicon Valley investor Robert McNamee called for Musk's arrest and said that it should
00:41:22.200 be a condition for getting government contracts should require him to moderate his speech.
00:41:27.480 So for the fact that his speech is not moderated, maybe he should go to jail or not get government
00:41:33.860 contracts. Robert Reich, the former Clinton Secretary of State, said Musk should be arrested for refusing
00:41:41.980 to censor other people. So he's not doing enough censorship on the X platform, so he should be arrested,
00:41:48.680 according to Robert Reich. And then Keith Olbermann, of course, batshit crazy Keith,
00:41:55.020 called for Musk to be deported. And all the federal contracts with his company is canceled.
00:42:04.140 Olbermann. The Democrats are crazy as shit. I mean, they're just batshit crazy. They can't even come up
00:42:13.380 with a crime. They're asking to jail the guy after he just did the greatest technical week of
00:42:22.460 innovation that anybody's ever done in the history of the United States. And all for the benefit of
00:42:28.360 humankind. And these assholes want to put him in jail. It's so pathetic. The Democrats have just
00:42:37.760 become completely pathetic. Anyway. Kamala Harris has a new racist plan. So she's not hiding anymore.
00:42:48.480 She's going full racist. And it involves providing... So it's a plan to get black voters on her side.
00:42:56.660 So it's a bunch of economic things targeted primarily at black voters. So she wants to give a million loans,
00:43:05.060 forgivable loans up to $20,000 for black entrepreneurs, and, quote, others who have
00:43:10.820 historically faced barriers. So in other words, not white men. So she wants to give... So if you're
00:43:17.200 poor and you're a white man, fuck you. You're a poor white man. Fuck you. Go die in the gutter
00:43:24.840 somewhere. Because the racist Kamala Harris has some good plans for people who are just as poor as you,
00:43:32.180 but they happen to have different colors. So she'll help them. But not you, you whitey. Go die in the gutter,
00:43:41.620 says the racist. And she would... Let's see. What else she would do? She would have a national health equity
00:43:49.900 initiative that would aim to address sickle cell disease, diabetes, mental health, prostate cancer, and other
00:43:55.380 health challenges that disproportionately impact black men. That one's good. That if there's one place
00:44:03.320 you should have equity, you should definitely have equity when it comes to health care. That's one
00:44:11.180 place where I'm all in. I'm all in on that. If black Americans have special, you know, some health care
00:44:18.580 risks in some categories. Yes. Yes. Go do that. So that's fair. Now, is it racist? Yes, but in a good
00:44:27.960 way. Is that a thing? Because, you know, the world is complicated. It's not like racism all bad,
00:44:37.780 racism all good. That's not true. This is purely racist because, you know, white people don't have
00:44:43.920 sickle cell and some of these special health impacts. But yeah, let's treat every patient
00:44:53.680 like they're unique. And if you can know something about them because of their genetic background,
00:44:58.700 that's part of what makes them unique. And let's get everybody some help. Absolutely. Totally on board
00:45:04.260 with that one. So that would be a case where in my... Because nobody's left behind, right? They're not
00:45:10.700 saying that if you're a white person, they're not going to check your prostate. If they decided
00:45:15.600 we're not going to check your prostate, if you're poor and you're white, I'm out. Just to be clear,
00:45:21.360 I'm not going to go to that level of racism. But if you want to make sure that people who are
00:45:26.720 different individuals with different situations are also treated as best they can, yes, full equity.
00:45:33.680 Give me all the equity you got. But how about this one? Legalizing recreational marijuana nationally
00:45:44.980 and creating opportunities for black Americans to succeed in the industry. Hmm. I know a white
00:45:53.000 American who once tried to open a weed business in California. And there were lots of obstacles
00:46:00.280 because it's actually a really hard business to get started. And he couldn't, he couldn't make it
00:46:06.000 through the red tape and the bureaucracy and the approvals and all that stuff. What's wrong with that
00:46:12.400 guy? Well, why can't he have a weed business? But if he were black, if he were black, he'd be in the weed
00:46:20.040 business. And that's fair how? Nope. Nope. You can go fix all the sickle cell anemia.
00:46:30.260 Please, please do. But no, this is just fucking racist. Everybody who is poor should have a shot
00:46:39.320 at everything that's better than being poor. No, this is just fucking racist.
00:46:45.980 Claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament. I've been visualizing my match all week.
00:46:50.820 She was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car on her backhand side.
00:46:55.760 Good thing Claudia's with Intact, the insurer with the largest network of auto service centers in the
00:47:01.860 country. Everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her way in a rental car in no time.
00:47:07.000 I made it to my tournament and lost in the first round. But you got there on time.
00:47:12.340 Intact Insurance, your auto service ace. Certain conditions apply.
00:47:15.820 How about this one? Harris would provide education, training and mentorship programs to help black men
00:47:22.980 get jobs in high demand industries. But she would target specifically teaching jobs.
00:47:28.180 What, there are no white men who could use a little mentoring and help to get a teaching job?
00:47:36.460 And why do you want to specifically target one group for one profession?
00:47:42.600 Why can't just everybody who needs a help get a little help?
00:47:45.960 This is purely racist. Purely racist. Now I will, but I'll make one small shift to this.
00:47:55.800 I do think that one of the biggest, I guess, systemic racism problems that I recognize besides
00:48:03.460 the school system is mentorship. Mentorship is a really big deal. If you happen to be lucky enough
00:48:12.300 to know a bunch of rich people, let's say your parents are doing well and they know other rich
00:48:16.500 people, that's a huge, huge advantage because you can get advice and you can get, you know,
00:48:24.040 connections and stuff. So if you could fix mentorship for the underserved people in the world, as long
00:48:30.880 as you're doing it for everybody, that would really be a big, that would be a really big bite out of
00:48:36.280 what I would agree is systemic racism. So for that, I'm all in. On mentorship, I think everybody
00:48:45.660 should get more. It's a fact that black Americans have less access. So a little extra effort.
00:48:53.120 I think that would be fair. But if you're, you know, spending money on things that everybody needs
00:49:02.320 and you're only allowing one group of people to get it, not so good, not so good. The thing about
00:49:08.580 mentorship is it doesn't cost anything. All right. One of the weird things I've told you a number of
00:49:14.600 times is that although I got canceled, I have and continue to mentor black individuals just because
00:49:24.040 they asked. It turns out the asking is a really good strategy. Who teaches this? There's somebody
00:49:33.040 very famous who recently has made a big deal about the fact that just asking, if you can learn to ask
00:49:41.360 knowing that you'll get turned down for a lot of stuff, you're going to get a lot of stuff.
00:49:45.640 So when somebody asks me for some kind of mentorship or advice or a connection or something,
00:49:52.840 I don't ask them their color. I don't ask them their politics. I don't say who you don't like
00:50:01.420 for president. I just say, you have something that you need. I have the answer to that question.
00:50:08.660 Why wouldn't I give it to you? Why wouldn't I? Of course I will. So when it comes to mentorship,
00:50:17.080 most of it should be free. And it's a gigantic disadvantage when you don't have it, white or
00:50:22.760 black. So I'm pretty liberal in giving it. So I'll give this advice. If you're black and you're
00:50:29.740 under mentored, it's probably the case. You should really just try asking some white people and some
00:50:36.080 brown people who have succeeded and some women who have succeeded. You're going to be amazed.
00:50:41.120 You're just going to be amazed how willing people are to help you out on an individual basis.
00:50:46.780 But if you go to somebody and say, can you do something for all the people who look like me?
00:50:52.480 Good luck. I'm not in on that at all. Not at all. But if you individually have something, sure.
00:50:59.940 Just ask. Trump is going off on
00:51:06.080 Kamala's brain. So I'm just going to read this because I love his writing. So this is a Trump
00:51:13.440 posting on truth. He said, quote, I believe it is very important that Kamala Harris pass a test on
00:51:19.000 cognitive stamina and agility. Her actions have led many to believe that there could be something
00:51:25.240 very wrong with her. Even 60 Minutes on CBS in order to protect Lion Kamala illegally and
00:51:33.440 unscrupulously replaced an answer she had given, which was totally bonkers with another answer that
00:51:39.860 had nothing to do with the question asked. Also, she is slow and lethargic
00:51:44.260 in answering even the easiest of questions. We just went through almost four years of that.
00:51:50.820 We shouldn't have to do it again. Oh, this is brilliant. It's brilliant. Now,
00:51:58.180 will she take a cognitive test? Of course not. Of course not. Will they fight back and say,
00:52:06.300 you're the one who's too old and should take a cognitive test? Of course they will.
00:52:10.820 But I love that he's injecting it into the conversation and saying that the evidence is clear
00:52:17.100 that she's got a cognitive deficit. Now, wasn't it, I need a fact check on this.
00:52:24.360 Did Harmeet Dillon say on Tucker Carlson that she remembers Kamala Harris from long ago
00:52:31.040 and that Kamala Harris didn't used to be stupid? Did that actually happen or did I imagine that?
00:52:38.240 Can you give me a fact check? So it would have been the Tucker Carlson conversation with Harmeet,
00:52:43.140 but I thought I saw like just a clip or a reference to it. So give me a fact check. I'm not sure of that.
00:52:49.880 But the funny thing is that I had that same experience.
00:52:55.040 Meaning that, let's say, I don't know, eight or 10 years ago, when I would see Kamala Harris in public,
00:53:02.460 like as a senator, I would say to myself, pretty good. Pretty good. Handled herself well.
00:53:08.420 And then I would see her at a hearing or something, and she'd be one of the attack dogs that the Democrats like.
00:53:15.220 And I'd say to myself, oh, you did some good questions there. You look tough, smart.
00:53:20.400 But then she runs for president, and she kind of looks like an idiot.
00:53:25.400 And I've been racking my brains and trying to figure out, was it me?
00:53:31.620 Was it me who just was fooled, but she's always been a moron? Or did something actually change?
00:53:39.900 Now, Trump is suggesting, by asking the question and asking for a cognitive test,
00:53:45.060 he's suggesting that something might have changed. And I'm on that page.
00:53:49.220 It could be substance abuse, which is what it looks like.
00:53:55.260 But it also looks like just some kind of cognitive decline.
00:54:01.640 And I mean that seriously. I don't mean that as, oh, say anything to make your candidate win.
00:54:08.020 And, you know, I'm pro-Trump. And I always say that whoever's against Trump has cognitive problems.
00:54:12.840 I don't. And I remind you, Joe Biden certainly had cognitive problems,
00:54:21.080 which I called out four years ago and was completely right.
00:54:28.580 Hillary Clinton has no cognitive problems whatsoever.
00:54:33.600 Not once did I suggest that she was not smart.
00:54:36.880 Not once did I suggest she had any kind of, you know, dementia.
00:54:41.460 Nor does she now.
00:54:44.160 I've never said it about Obama.
00:54:46.540 Clearly very smart.
00:54:48.200 Clearly does not have any dementia.
00:54:51.760 But I'm one for one on Joe Biden.
00:54:54.220 And I'm one of the ones who caught it as early as you could possibly catch it.
00:54:58.860 I'm catching something with her.
00:55:01.580 There's something.
00:55:03.460 I don't know what it is, but it's a mystery.
00:55:06.680 I would love to know if she used to be smart and isn't.
00:55:09.620 Or is it a substance abuse problem?
00:55:14.700 Or is it me?
00:55:17.680 Because remember, I can't rule out the possibility it's me.
00:55:20.840 It could be that I'm so deeply biased or maybe she was always dumb,
00:55:25.780 but she acted better back then because she had some notes or something.
00:55:28.580 I don't know.
00:55:29.020 I just don't know.
00:55:31.240 Somehow she became a senator.
00:55:33.980 So we all watched her try to run for president the first time,
00:55:37.620 where she was the first one that got kicked out of the primary.
00:55:42.100 What did her Senate races look like?
00:55:45.060 Was that just the California machine put her in office
00:55:48.000 and it didn't matter how she campaigned?
00:55:49.700 Did she ever act capable?
00:55:53.260 I'm very curious about that.
00:55:55.040 I really don't know.
00:55:56.900 But I love the fact that Trump is injecting that idea into our conversation.
00:56:03.620 Now, do you remember I've been telling you
00:56:06.840 that there's something I called an October surprise coming,
00:56:10.740 and I told you that I had some knowledge of it coming?
00:56:13.760 Well, today's the day I'm going to tell you what it is.
00:56:17.880 You've already seen it.
00:56:20.760 It's the polls.
00:56:22.420 The polls were going to change in the middle of October,
00:56:25.660 and you were going to be shocked
00:56:27.380 because nothing would happen that would make the polls change.
00:56:30.940 All it's going to be is a rethinking of who the likely voters are,
00:56:35.380 and once that's rejiggered, which is what's happening now,
00:56:39.160 it's going to make Harris look less competitive.
00:56:42.260 And it's going to happen suddenly.
00:56:44.260 It's going to be dramatic,
00:56:45.440 and it's going to change the conversation totally.
00:56:50.320 And it just happened.
00:56:54.100 So we got some new numbers coming out.
00:57:01.600 So according to, let's see, ABC and NBC,
00:57:06.360 if I said ABC and NBC,
00:57:08.920 what would you say about their support
00:57:11.180 for Democrats versus Republicans, ABC and NBC?
00:57:15.980 You would say, oh, those are the two friendliest networks
00:57:21.060 to Kamala Harris.
00:57:22.580 In fact, ABC is, you know, Martha Raddatz.
00:57:25.700 ABC is the last debate that people think was fixed.
00:57:32.200 So ABC News, the poll before this most recent one,
00:57:38.980 had Harris up by six.
00:57:41.700 Does that sound like that was true?
00:57:44.300 Does anybody believe that Harris was up by six last week?
00:57:49.020 Just last week?
00:57:50.860 Up by six?
00:57:53.500 Well, they just revised it, and now she's up by two,
00:57:56.080 which is probably the margin of error.
00:57:58.040 Do you think that anybody in the real world,
00:58:02.520 when nothing really happened,
00:58:04.340 do you think she really went from six to two?
00:58:07.260 No, of course not.
00:58:09.100 No, not in the real world.
00:58:12.000 No, they must have rejiggered
00:58:13.820 who the likely voters would be.
00:58:17.140 How about NBC?
00:58:18.920 NBC, until last week, had Harris up five.
00:58:23.120 Up five?
00:58:24.140 Do you believe that Harris was up five last week?
00:58:28.040 They just, they have a new poll now.
00:58:32.520 It's tied.
00:58:34.200 Now it's tied.
00:58:36.020 Do you think that in the normal world,
00:58:39.060 she went down five points in a week
00:58:41.220 when nothing really happened?
00:58:43.700 No, of course not.
00:58:44.800 Of course not.
00:58:45.480 Those are polls being rejiggered.
00:58:48.360 Now, the other thing I predicted
00:58:50.140 is that it wouldn't happen all at once.
00:58:53.160 There would be an obvious pattern to it.
00:58:56.600 So the pattern would be that
00:58:57.900 for the few months leading up to it,
00:59:00.760 everybody would be a little biased toward Harris.
00:59:06.480 And it would make it look like it's a close race
00:59:09.100 because everybody likes it to be a close race.
00:59:11.300 But even the pollsters who knew
00:59:13.360 that those poll numbers were maybe a little artificial
00:59:17.400 because of the assumptions they made
00:59:19.160 about who was going to vote,
00:59:20.780 they knew they were going to close toward the election day.
00:59:24.160 And the middle of October is when you do it
00:59:25.960 because you don't want to do it too soon,
00:59:27.640 but you don't want to do it too late.
00:59:29.020 The middle of October is just right.
00:59:31.500 So from the start,
00:59:33.560 I predicted that the pattern would be
00:59:36.060 the polls are really tight.
00:59:38.000 You can't tell who's going to win.
00:59:39.340 There'd be some, you know, outliers,
00:59:40.800 but basically all tight on average.
00:59:42.360 Then you need, here's the second part that I predicted.
00:59:48.480 You're going to need a couple of very pro-Harris polls
00:59:52.240 to reverse.
00:59:54.700 Somebody's got to go first.
00:59:56.720 If somebody doesn't go first,
00:59:58.860 the rest won't follow.
01:00:00.560 So it's got to be a name brand
01:00:02.220 or one or two big ones.
01:00:04.400 It just happened.
01:00:06.260 NBC and ABC, they went first.
01:00:08.580 So now they took the ridiculous numbers
01:00:11.640 and took it down to something closer
01:00:13.180 to a statistical tie.
01:00:15.620 Do you think they're done?
01:00:18.640 Do you think that that's now reality
01:00:20.880 that they took it from Harris way ahead,
01:00:23.920 winning easily, down to a tie?
01:00:27.380 Do you think they're done adjusting?
01:00:31.460 No, they're not.
01:00:32.460 So what you should see
01:00:35.500 is what I'm calling the Kamala collapse.
01:00:39.380 So you're going to see
01:00:40.500 a complete collapse of the polling.
01:00:42.860 And it's not really a change.
01:00:44.820 It's just they're adjusting it closer to reality
01:00:47.360 because they have to
01:00:48.080 when it gets to the actual end.
01:00:50.140 And here it is.
01:00:53.660 It's exactly on schedule.
01:00:56.020 It's like right on schedule.
01:00:58.100 You could have predicted this six months ago.
01:01:00.320 I mean, she wasn't the candidate six months ago.
01:01:02.460 But you could have predicted
01:01:03.600 that whoever was the candidate,
01:01:05.420 it would be close, close, close
01:01:07.280 until October.
01:01:09.400 And then you would see this pattern.
01:01:11.740 Now, Biden was a special case
01:01:13.940 because we've never seen anybody
01:01:16.080 lose a debate the way he lost the debate.
01:01:18.960 So his numbers would not have been close
01:01:21.140 even in the summer.
01:01:23.460 You know, August would have been a route
01:01:25.160 and, you know, there's no way
01:01:26.960 it would have been close.
01:01:28.080 So he was sort of a wild card.
01:01:29.880 But the moment they took him out
01:01:31.400 and put in something
01:01:32.360 that's sort of like a normal person to run,
01:01:35.540 immediately it did the thing
01:01:36.920 it's supposed to do,
01:01:37.660 which, oh, they're tied.
01:01:39.340 Oh, Harris is a little bit ahead, actually.
01:01:41.180 A little bit ahead.
01:01:41.880 So give us money.
01:01:42.600 How much fundraising would Harris do
01:01:46.040 if she had always been shown as behind?
01:01:50.900 It'd be hard.
01:01:52.420 Why would you give money to that?
01:01:53.840 But if they show that it's a horse race
01:01:56.820 and it's tie,
01:01:58.140 then you really think
01:01:59.260 your money is going to make a difference.
01:02:01.020 If you're the billionaire
01:02:02.080 who can give $20 million to a pack
01:02:04.920 and it looks like it's a tie,
01:02:08.460 you're going to say to yourself,
01:02:09.540 you know,
01:02:10.400 my $20 million
01:02:12.100 could easily be the difference in this race.
01:02:15.900 And then you open up the wallet.
01:02:17.560 But if the race is a route,
01:02:20.580 why would you give money?
01:02:22.520 It has to be close to give money.
01:02:25.220 It has to be close
01:02:26.280 to even bother running commercials
01:02:27.740 on the news networks.
01:02:29.660 So making it close
01:02:31.060 is sort of so important
01:02:32.980 for the whole system
01:02:34.640 that all the biases are there
01:02:37.340 to just force it to look close
01:02:38.960 when it really maybe isn't.
01:02:41.920 All right.
01:02:43.040 Here's some more hints
01:02:44.200 about the Kamala collapse.
01:02:45.800 I told you about this,
01:02:47.320 but Michael Tracy,
01:02:48.480 independent journalist,
01:02:51.000 said that Kamala Harris's
01:02:53.100 Univision crowd
01:02:54.160 was half-rent-a-crowd,
01:02:56.380 meaning literally a company goes out
01:02:58.340 and pays people
01:02:59.360 to be attendees
01:03:00.980 at different audiences.
01:03:02.380 So half of it was paid
01:03:04.060 and half was flown in
01:03:06.060 because they were supporters.
01:03:10.500 They were supposed to be undecided,
01:03:13.620 but I think they got
01:03:14.980 very few undecideds, if any.
01:03:19.680 Then, of course,
01:03:20.500 they've got Tim Walsh
01:03:21.720 going out trying to pretend
01:03:23.460 to be a real man
01:03:24.360 and completely failing at it.
01:03:28.020 The people who know guns
01:03:29.260 better than I do
01:03:30.040 say he was awkward
01:03:31.300 with his gun stuff
01:03:33.180 and he looked like
01:03:34.260 he just bought his hunting clothes
01:03:35.800 that morning
01:03:36.380 and all kinds of things
01:03:38.200 that didn't make it look
01:03:39.200 as manly as it was supposed to.
01:03:40.620 And Scott Jennings
01:03:44.480 on CNN
01:03:45.100 put it this way,
01:03:46.920 that Tim Walsh
01:03:48.040 was doing hunting cosplay.
01:03:50.920 Cosplay,
01:03:51.500 where you're just pretending
01:03:52.360 to be a character.
01:03:53.860 He goes,
01:03:54.120 Tim Walsh is doing hunting cosplay
01:03:55.560 and cringy videos
01:03:56.820 that are not helping with men.
01:03:58.780 I'm going to go further
01:04:00.220 and I'm going to say
01:04:01.840 if you look at the way
01:04:02.980 the Democrats
01:04:03.960 very publicly,
01:04:06.160 they said they were going
01:04:07.320 to try to woo men
01:04:08.320 and then they showed
01:04:10.500 that they don't even know
01:04:11.680 what men are.
01:04:14.660 Apparently,
01:04:15.300 there are so few people
01:04:16.760 with influence
01:04:17.600 who are men,
01:04:19.300 I'll say heterosexual men
01:04:20.800 because that's what
01:04:21.320 they were targeting,
01:04:22.680 that they didn't even know
01:04:24.100 how to get one of them
01:04:25.520 to pretend to be one.
01:04:26.600 Wouldn't you love
01:04:28.480 to have been in those meetings?
01:04:30.280 All right,
01:04:30.800 Tim,
01:04:31.720 we've got a problem with men,
01:04:32.940 we need to woo some men.
01:04:35.080 He goes,
01:04:35.320 well,
01:04:35.440 we've got all the gay men,
01:04:37.020 you know,
01:04:37.220 or most of them.
01:04:39.560 We're working on Richard Grinnell,
01:04:41.200 but we think we have
01:04:41.800 most of the gay men.
01:04:43.880 Scott Pressler,
01:04:44.780 no,
01:04:45.240 we don't have him,
01:04:46.440 but we'll work on him too.
01:04:48.000 But we think we have
01:04:48.900 most of the gay men.
01:04:51.020 So,
01:04:51.580 how can we woo
01:04:52.400 the,
01:04:53.520 how can we woo
01:04:54.860 the heteros?
01:04:55.740 and like,
01:04:56.940 anybody have any ideas?
01:04:58.120 And somebody's like,
01:04:59.040 I've got it.
01:05:01.100 Monster trucks.
01:05:03.060 No,
01:05:03.480 two,
01:05:03.720 two on the nose,
01:05:04.740 two on the nose.
01:05:06.400 How about
01:05:07.000 shooting things?
01:05:09.800 Shooting things.
01:05:10.520 They like to shoot things.
01:05:11.860 Yes.
01:05:13.000 Yes.
01:05:13.820 We're going to have our guy
01:05:14.780 go out and shoot something.
01:05:17.200 But,
01:05:17.860 oh,
01:05:18.160 hold on,
01:05:18.700 hold on.
01:05:19.100 You have your hand up?
01:05:20.560 I'm a vegetarian.
01:05:21.560 Oh.
01:05:22.840 Oh.
01:05:24.500 Okay.
01:05:25.100 Well,
01:05:25.640 he needs to shoot something,
01:05:26.980 but we don't want to see him
01:05:27.880 shooting something.
01:05:29.420 How about he just goes
01:05:30.440 into the forest
01:05:31.220 with a gun,
01:05:32.460 loads it,
01:05:33.200 and then we don't see him
01:05:34.360 shoot anything
01:05:35.080 because we don't want to see
01:05:36.740 any dead stuff.
01:05:38.180 Too manly?
01:05:40.240 Perfect.
01:05:42.660 You can just imagine
01:05:43.860 what that conversation
01:05:44.900 looked like
01:05:45.540 with no actual
01:05:46.940 men consulting.
01:05:48.580 It must have been hilarious.
01:05:50.060 I would love
01:05:51.520 to have the recording
01:05:52.340 of that meeting
01:05:53.040 of how they were
01:05:54.140 pretending to be men.
01:05:56.060 And then they look around
01:05:56.940 and they go,
01:05:57.520 okay,
01:05:58.500 how about
01:05:58.920 we just look at
01:06:00.300 some of our
01:06:00.920 actual heterosexual
01:06:02.120 male Democrats
01:06:03.840 and we'll use them
01:06:05.100 as a model?
01:06:05.960 And they're like,
01:06:06.640 yes,
01:06:07.300 yes.
01:06:08.160 Who do we have?
01:06:09.760 James Carville.
01:06:12.180 No,
01:06:12.620 no,
01:06:12.820 no,
01:06:13.060 no,
01:06:13.240 no,
01:06:13.460 no.
01:06:13.780 Whoa.
01:06:16.260 I mean,
01:06:16.800 it must have been hilarious.
01:06:17.940 That's all I'm saying.
01:06:18.820 You can imagine it.
01:06:20.060 Yeah,
01:06:21.920 anyway.
01:06:23.080 When I found out
01:06:24.100 my friend got a great deal
01:06:25.520 on a wool coat
01:06:26.280 from Winners,
01:06:27.120 I started wondering,
01:06:28.800 is every fabulous item
01:06:30.400 I see from Winners?
01:06:31.880 Like that woman over there
01:06:33.180 with the designer jeans.
01:06:34.600 Are those from Winners?
01:06:36.160 Ooh,
01:06:36.780 or those beautiful gold earrings?
01:06:38.620 Did she pay full price?
01:06:39.940 Or that leather tote?
01:06:40.980 Or that cashmere sweater?
01:06:42.160 Or those knee-high boots?
01:06:43.640 That dress?
01:06:44.420 That jacket?
01:06:45.100 Those shoes?
01:06:46.120 Is anyone paying
01:06:47.320 full price for anything?
01:06:49.080 Stop wondering.
01:06:50.360 Start winning.
01:06:51.280 Winners find fabulous
01:06:52.540 for less.
01:06:55.680 I wasn't really following
01:06:57.100 the congressional races,
01:06:59.660 so according to The Hill,
01:07:01.740 the Senate race
01:07:02.860 will be close
01:07:03.640 in the sense of
01:07:04.480 who's controlling
01:07:05.460 the Senate
01:07:05.920 when we're done.
01:07:06.560 But The Hill thinks
01:07:08.200 that it's leaning GOP.
01:07:10.920 So if things went
01:07:12.000 the way we expect,
01:07:14.220 Republicans would
01:07:16.020 have control of the Senate.
01:07:17.720 Now,
01:07:18.200 is there a wild card
01:07:19.380 involved here?
01:07:20.100 Of course there is.
01:07:21.360 Because when The Hill
01:07:22.360 says it's leaning Republican,
01:07:25.180 they also are believing
01:07:27.860 their own polls.
01:07:28.800 So if Trump were to win
01:07:32.340 only as much
01:07:33.180 as the polls suggest
01:07:34.520 he will,
01:07:35.520 then it's going to be close,
01:07:37.140 but the GOP
01:07:38.160 might have a slight edge.
01:07:40.480 But what happens
01:07:41.640 if Trump dominates
01:07:44.100 the election?
01:07:44.780 Just kills.
01:07:45.700 Well,
01:07:47.600 usually
01:07:48.120 that drags along
01:07:50.120 a lot of undercard
01:07:51.620 people like senators
01:07:52.720 and representatives.
01:07:54.660 So if the polling
01:07:56.220 is bullshit
01:07:57.040 and the actual results
01:07:59.720 are Trump
01:08:00.320 just does a Reagan
01:08:02.120 and just controls
01:08:03.280 the whole electoral college,
01:08:05.440 the Senate
01:08:06.040 is going to go Republican.
01:08:07.700 I feel like
01:08:08.880 that's a likely outcome.
01:08:11.100 And I also think
01:08:11.740 it's likely
01:08:12.300 that Trump
01:08:13.440 will outperform.
01:08:14.660 So I'm going to say
01:08:15.680 the greatest,
01:08:17.540 I'd say two to one.
01:08:19.500 I'll go two to one.
01:08:22.240 Republicans take the Senate.
01:08:24.160 Two to one odds.
01:08:26.380 Then there's the House.
01:08:28.600 It's kind of weird
01:08:29.340 how often the House
01:08:30.980 and the Senate
01:08:31.540 change sides.
01:08:33.800 You would think
01:08:34.700 it wouldn't happen that much,
01:08:36.260 but it's kind of weird
01:08:37.040 that it happens often.
01:08:38.380 So the House
01:08:39.420 that's currently Republican
01:08:40.780 but barely
01:08:41.520 might go
01:08:43.220 slightly
01:08:45.040 they might go
01:08:48.020 slightly
01:08:48.420 in that direction.
01:08:51.180 But again,
01:08:52.320 the wild card
01:08:53.180 is Trump's performance.
01:08:55.420 So if Trump
01:08:55.960 performs amazingly,
01:08:58.200 then maybe
01:08:59.480 even the House
01:09:00.080 goes his way.
01:09:01.460 So there is
01:09:01.920 some possibility.
01:09:03.680 I don't think it's...
01:09:05.680 I give it
01:09:07.660 maybe a
01:09:08.260 55,
01:09:10.380 60% chance
01:09:11.600 that the Republicans
01:09:14.140 end up
01:09:14.940 having control
01:09:15.800 of the courts,
01:09:17.200 the Senate,
01:09:18.200 the House,
01:09:18.740 and the presidency.
01:09:20.580 It's possible.
01:09:22.500 60% chance.
01:09:24.800 And the 60%
01:09:25.880 is entirely based
01:09:27.240 on Trump
01:09:27.900 overperforming.
01:09:29.460 If Trump just
01:09:30.660 sort of,
01:09:31.420 you know,
01:09:31.880 barely squeaks
01:09:32.740 in a victory,
01:09:33.460 then,
01:09:33.800 well,
01:09:34.140 maybe not the House.
01:09:37.160 Right.
01:09:37.400 So my prediction
01:09:38.640 is Trump
01:09:39.580 dominant performance
01:09:41.000 takes the House,
01:09:43.080 takes the Senate,
01:09:44.280 and then he can
01:09:45.540 have his way
01:09:46.280 with the courts.
01:09:48.680 That's my take.
01:09:52.240 MSNBC
01:09:52.800 is worried
01:09:53.620 about Trump
01:09:54.660 presidency
01:09:55.200 and they say
01:09:56.660 they're alarmed
01:09:57.880 that the,
01:09:59.240 they might be
01:10:00.360 floating the idea
01:10:01.520 of having
01:10:03.240 Kash Patel
01:10:04.060 as the attorney
01:10:04.900 general
01:10:05.260 and
01:10:06.600 he is,
01:10:08.340 Kash Patel
01:10:08.860 has apparently
01:10:09.520 said that
01:10:10.120 we'd go out
01:10:10.700 and find
01:10:11.020 conspirators,
01:10:12.120 not just in the
01:10:12.640 government,
01:10:13.120 but in the media,
01:10:14.160 the people who
01:10:14.820 did bad things
01:10:15.720 in 2020,
01:10:16.640 allegedly,
01:10:17.460 and put them
01:10:18.640 in jail
01:10:19.000 going after them,
01:10:20.500 I guess.
01:10:21.820 Now,
01:10:22.800 I'm not in favor
01:10:24.680 of lawfare,
01:10:26.100 so I want to be
01:10:27.880 really clear
01:10:28.420 about that.
01:10:30.020 If Trump wins
01:10:31.540 and I see
01:10:33.160 even one example,
01:10:34.900 even one example
01:10:36.540 of them trying
01:10:37.900 to jail a,
01:10:39.580 let's say,
01:10:40.140 a member of the
01:10:40.780 media who's,
01:10:41.840 you know,
01:10:42.100 maybe biased,
01:10:42.860 but just doing
01:10:43.580 that biased media
01:10:44.640 thing,
01:10:45.460 I'm out.
01:10:48.100 I'm not going
01:10:48.920 to fight this
01:10:49.560 hard to get
01:10:51.360 a Trump
01:10:51.780 administration
01:10:52.280 to protect
01:10:53.280 the First
01:10:53.740 Amendment
01:10:54.120 and to protect
01:10:55.540 our rights
01:10:56.180 and let him
01:10:57.560 do the same
01:10:58.080 thing that we're
01:10:58.600 trying to prevent.
01:11:00.820 That's not going
01:11:01.640 to happen,
01:11:02.480 right?
01:11:02.740 If they go
01:11:03.760 full lawfare,
01:11:05.040 I am so out
01:11:06.420 and I'm going
01:11:07.640 to be out,
01:11:08.220 not violently,
01:11:09.300 but assertively,
01:11:10.820 I will be out
01:11:11.500 if they do that.
01:11:13.400 Now,
01:11:13.840 if they're putting
01:11:15.160 people who really
01:11:16.120 broke the law
01:11:17.060 in jail,
01:11:18.580 that's fine,
01:11:20.060 but you better
01:11:21.460 bring the goods.
01:11:22.380 It better not look
01:11:23.040 like lawfare to me.
01:11:24.780 It better not look
01:11:25.560 like a bunch of,
01:11:26.240 you know,
01:11:26.520 bullshit Soros
01:11:28.640 prosecutors.
01:11:29.380 I am nowhere
01:11:30.680 near being okay
01:11:31.600 with that,
01:11:32.520 just to be clear.
01:11:34.000 So whether it's
01:11:34.700 Kash Patel
01:11:35.380 or anybody else,
01:11:36.760 you better not.
01:11:38.420 You better not.
01:11:39.980 I'm not cool
01:11:40.840 with that.
01:11:42.020 You know,
01:11:42.300 I wouldn't even
01:11:43.160 want to be associated
01:11:43.960 with anybody
01:11:44.680 who had that
01:11:45.600 point of view.
01:11:49.020 So maybe all
01:11:50.100 you need is
01:11:50.600 truth and labeling.
01:11:53.920 Imagine you had
01:11:55.560 truth and labeling
01:11:56.420 for the news
01:11:57.460 organizations.
01:11:58.200 and you came up
01:12:00.780 with some
01:12:01.120 objective standard.
01:12:03.000 So let's say
01:12:03.460 the objective
01:12:04.040 standard was
01:12:04.900 the percentage
01:12:05.680 of time
01:12:06.400 that each
01:12:07.540 network spends,
01:12:08.440 let's say,
01:12:08.940 criticizing one
01:12:09.880 candidate
01:12:10.340 while praising
01:12:11.840 the other.
01:12:13.160 And let's just
01:12:13.740 say you said,
01:12:14.800 you know,
01:12:15.120 if it's 60-40,
01:12:18.040 that's okay.
01:12:20.360 You know,
01:12:20.640 you might be
01:12:21.340 trying to give
01:12:22.060 the news,
01:12:22.740 but you're a
01:12:23.180 little bit biased.
01:12:24.120 Bias is not
01:12:24.780 against the law
01:12:25.500 and you probably
01:12:27.020 don't even need
01:12:27.580 to label it.
01:12:29.000 But suppose,
01:12:30.320 like MSNBC,
01:12:31.940 it's 99%
01:12:33.460 negative in one
01:12:34.500 direction
01:12:34.880 and, you know,
01:12:36.720 99% positive
01:12:37.980 in the other
01:12:38.340 direction.
01:12:39.280 Is that news?
01:12:40.840 That's not news.
01:12:42.840 It's not even
01:12:43.540 close to news.
01:12:44.360 It's propaganda.
01:12:45.740 So if the
01:12:46.540 government did
01:12:47.180 a truth and
01:12:47.880 labeling where
01:12:49.260 they said,
01:12:49.920 if you're over,
01:12:50.780 I'll pick a
01:12:51.320 number,
01:12:51.680 if you're over
01:12:52.180 80% negative
01:12:54.340 to one side,
01:12:55.780 you know,
01:12:56.360 over the
01:12:56.820 course of
01:12:57.240 some extended
01:12:57.820 period,
01:12:58.620 you don't get
01:12:59.500 to call yourself
01:13:00.100 news.
01:13:01.600 You only get
01:13:02.580 to call yourself
01:13:03.300 propaganda.
01:13:04.420 Now,
01:13:05.000 I'm not sure
01:13:05.660 if my example
01:13:06.360 of how to
01:13:06.840 measure that
01:13:07.360 is a good
01:13:07.800 one,
01:13:08.260 but let's
01:13:09.000 say another
01:13:09.640 measure would
01:13:10.240 be the
01:13:11.300 frequency that
01:13:12.480 alternative views
01:13:13.680 are showcased.
01:13:14.760 when I turn
01:13:16.160 on CNN
01:13:16.700 and they've
01:13:17.580 got the
01:13:18.080 panel discussion,
01:13:20.140 they always
01:13:21.500 include Scott
01:13:22.340 Jennings
01:13:22.760 and the
01:13:24.820 other gentleman
01:13:25.360 whose name I
01:13:25.900 can't remember,
01:13:26.580 the shaved head
01:13:27.520 gentleman,
01:13:28.280 he's pretty good
01:13:28.820 as well,
01:13:29.460 and they do,
01:13:30.980 they have
01:13:31.720 complete time
01:13:32.760 to give the
01:13:33.940 opposing view.
01:13:35.400 Now,
01:13:35.920 if I were to
01:13:36.520 rate CNN,
01:13:37.640 I would say
01:13:38.480 biased,
01:13:39.500 but news,
01:13:41.100 but news,
01:13:42.440 because they're
01:13:43.220 showing both
01:13:43.660 sides.
01:13:44.500 Maybe they're
01:13:45.100 showing 60-40.
01:13:48.400 That's more
01:13:49.100 just human,
01:13:50.080 but they're
01:13:51.320 showing both
01:13:51.820 sides.
01:13:53.080 If you switch
01:13:54.080 to MSNBC,
01:13:55.140 you don't see
01:13:55.560 both sides.
01:13:57.920 That's more
01:13:58.580 like a 99-1
01:13:59.960 situation.
01:14:01.060 Do you think
01:14:01.520 that they should
01:14:02.000 both be called
01:14:02.660 news?
01:14:04.100 I don't think
01:14:04.980 so.
01:14:06.120 Now,
01:14:06.660 how about
01:14:06.980 Fox News?
01:14:09.140 Fox News
01:14:09.940 would be a
01:14:10.300 little more
01:14:10.580 interesting,
01:14:11.400 because if you
01:14:12.160 take the five,
01:14:12.920 for example,
01:14:13.340 they always
01:14:13.840 have the
01:14:14.620 one Democrat,
01:14:16.980 Jessica Tarlov,
01:14:18.400 or Harold
01:14:19.240 Ford Jr.,
01:14:20.620 and so you're
01:14:21.780 always going to
01:14:22.480 get,
01:14:23.200 on that opinion
01:14:24.600 program,
01:14:25.600 an opposing
01:14:27.640 view.
01:14:28.820 But it's very
01:14:29.860 slanted.
01:14:31.300 If you go to
01:14:31.860 Hannity,
01:14:32.460 you're not
01:14:32.900 necessarily going
01:14:33.560 to get it,
01:14:33.980 but to
01:14:34.900 Hannity's
01:14:35.500 credit,
01:14:36.780 this has to
01:14:37.680 be said,
01:14:38.600 Hannity doesn't
01:14:39.280 have a lot of
01:14:39.800 opposing views,
01:14:40.740 but he
01:14:41.900 invites them
01:14:42.640 all.
01:14:44.420 That counts.
01:14:46.120 They choose
01:14:46.880 not to go
01:14:47.340 on,
01:14:48.020 but he
01:14:48.360 invites them.
01:14:49.420 He invites
01:14:49.920 them.
01:14:50.220 He says it
01:14:50.700 publicly,
01:14:51.360 and he means
01:14:52.140 it,
01:14:52.420 and sometimes
01:14:53.000 they say
01:14:53.400 yes,
01:14:53.720 and he
01:14:53.940 puts them
01:14:54.240 on.
01:14:55.380 So I
01:14:56.040 don't feel
01:14:56.400 the same
01:14:56.760 about that
01:14:57.520 as I do
01:14:59.180 about somebody
01:14:59.740 who doesn't
01:15:00.120 invite anybody.
01:15:01.520 I mean,
01:15:01.820 that's different.
01:15:02.400 So I
01:15:04.100 think Fox
01:15:04.540 News would
01:15:04.920 be a little
01:15:05.200 more nuanced
01:15:05.900 because they
01:15:06.420 do a better
01:15:06.840 job of
01:15:07.460 separating the
01:15:08.220 news from
01:15:08.720 the opinion,
01:15:09.620 and then when
01:15:10.260 they do the
01:15:10.780 opinion,
01:15:11.300 they do
01:15:11.640 actually try
01:15:12.200 to get the
01:15:12.540 other opinion
01:15:13.020 on.
01:15:13.420 So CNN,
01:15:14.780 Fox News,
01:15:15.960 I would call
01:15:16.740 them both
01:15:17.140 news.
01:15:18.080 Very biased,
01:15:19.940 but news.
01:15:22.740 MSNBC,
01:15:23.500 not even
01:15:23.980 close.
01:15:25.240 Not even
01:15:25.700 close.
01:15:26.760 It's not in
01:15:27.540 the same
01:15:27.920 universe as a
01:15:28.960 news program.
01:15:30.720 And the fact,
01:15:31.260 if we had
01:15:32.040 truth in
01:15:32.540 labeling,
01:15:33.380 like we do
01:15:34.280 with banks,
01:15:35.080 like we do
01:15:35.520 with products,
01:15:36.340 like we do
01:15:36.760 on labels,
01:15:37.420 on boxes,
01:15:38.020 like we do
01:15:38.500 with cigarettes,
01:15:40.600 MSNBC should
01:15:41.560 just be labeled.
01:15:43.160 I don't need
01:15:43.980 to put anybody
01:15:44.480 in jail.
01:15:45.860 I have no
01:15:46.800 impulse for
01:15:47.440 that whatsoever.
01:15:49.460 No jail.
01:15:50.900 No.
01:15:51.740 Just label
01:15:52.300 it.
01:15:53.120 Label it
01:15:53.440 what it is.
01:15:57.180 All right.
01:15:58.840 Here's something
01:15:59.580 I did the
01:16:00.180 other day
01:16:00.660 that I came
01:16:01.980 to regret
01:16:02.540 right away.
01:16:04.220 So as you
01:16:05.000 know,
01:16:05.440 author,
01:16:06.820 I may have
01:16:07.740 his name
01:16:08.080 read,
01:16:08.660 Tahezy Coates.
01:16:10.760 I'm not
01:16:11.260 intentionally
01:16:12.400 mispronouncing
01:16:13.100 his name.
01:16:13.600 I just didn't
01:16:14.000 write it down
01:16:14.620 and it's a
01:16:16.080 hard one to
01:16:16.500 remember.
01:16:16.900 But you know
01:16:17.220 who I'm
01:16:17.400 talking about,
01:16:17.860 right?
01:16:18.520 Can you give
01:16:19.240 me his proper
01:16:19.920 name in the
01:16:20.480 comments and
01:16:21.340 I'll say it
01:16:21.820 correctly when
01:16:22.340 I see it.
01:16:23.500 Tahezy Coates?
01:16:25.440 Is that
01:16:25.880 close?
01:16:27.140 Anyway,
01:16:27.440 he's going
01:16:29.720 around and
01:16:30.200 he's got a
01:16:30.560 book and
01:16:31.160 it involves
01:16:33.000 Israel and
01:16:33.920 the Palestinians
01:16:34.720 and he
01:16:35.900 says some
01:16:36.420 things and
01:16:36.920 then people
01:16:37.340 get really
01:16:37.820 mad.
01:16:38.440 And I
01:16:38.660 saw him
01:16:38.940 say some
01:16:39.380 things and
01:16:40.460 then I
01:16:40.740 saw a
01:16:41.320 woman who
01:16:41.820 did a
01:16:42.220 very long,
01:16:44.040 very angry
01:16:44.860 takedown.
01:16:47.600 But what
01:16:49.900 I noticed
01:16:50.440 is that the
01:16:51.120 thing he
01:16:51.520 said, the
01:16:52.360 clip that
01:16:52.880 she was
01:16:53.220 responding to,
01:16:54.620 her response
01:16:55.660 didn't seem
01:16:56.400 to be a
01:16:56.820 response to
01:16:57.360 what he
01:16:57.560 said.
01:16:58.660 Now, I
01:16:59.800 wasn't
01:17:00.200 agreeing with
01:17:01.200 what he
01:17:01.520 said.
01:17:02.560 I simply
01:17:03.380 in the
01:17:03.680 comments
01:17:04.000 said that
01:17:05.160 your response
01:17:06.200 to him
01:17:06.500 doesn't
01:17:06.820 address his
01:17:07.340 point.
01:17:09.120 His point
01:17:10.020 was that
01:17:11.320 he could
01:17:12.180 understand
01:17:12.880 how if
01:17:14.000 you plopped
01:17:14.680 a young
01:17:15.320 kid into
01:17:16.040 the Palestinian
01:17:16.880 situation,
01:17:17.600 that they
01:17:18.720 could become
01:17:19.240 radicalized,
01:17:20.220 which I
01:17:21.360 completely
01:17:21.720 agree with.
01:17:22.920 Because you
01:17:23.560 could plop
01:17:24.080 anybody into
01:17:24.840 any situation
01:17:25.700 and they
01:17:26.580 would turn
01:17:27.040 into that
01:17:27.600 culture.
01:17:28.680 If you
01:17:29.240 took a
01:17:29.600 baby and
01:17:30.440 plopped
01:17:30.800 it into
01:17:31.240 the Hindu
01:17:31.960 world,
01:17:33.880 do you
01:17:34.140 think they'd
01:17:34.520 become a
01:17:34.920 Hindu?
01:17:36.080 Probably.
01:17:39.280 If you
01:17:39.920 take a
01:17:40.360 baby and
01:17:40.920 you plop
01:17:41.320 them into
01:17:41.720 a Christian
01:17:43.040 world,
01:17:44.000 are they
01:17:44.420 going to
01:17:44.720 be a
01:17:45.060 Christian?
01:17:46.560 Probably.
01:17:47.960 Probably.
01:17:48.980 If you
01:17:49.720 take a
01:17:50.120 kid and
01:17:50.480 you pop
01:17:50.860 them into
01:17:51.180 the
01:17:51.320 Palestinian
01:17:51.880 situation
01:17:52.660 and they're
01:17:53.720 propagandized
01:17:55.320 the way
01:17:55.600 they are
01:17:56.060 and they
01:17:56.940 see roadblocks
01:17:58.920 that don't
01:17:59.340 apply to
01:17:59.800 the Israelis,
01:18:00.780 they don't
01:18:01.240 know the
01:18:01.520 whole story,
01:18:02.160 they don't
01:18:02.400 know the
01:18:02.660 history,
01:18:03.680 they see
01:18:04.220 that some
01:18:05.360 things are
01:18:05.720 happening to
01:18:06.160 them that
01:18:06.600 aren't
01:18:06.760 happening to
01:18:07.180 other people,
01:18:07.880 they don't
01:18:08.320 know the
01:18:08.620 history,
01:18:09.840 of course
01:18:10.300 they would
01:18:10.540 be
01:18:10.660 radicalized.
01:18:11.260 And he
01:18:12.220 said,
01:18:12.760 you know,
01:18:13.100 I'd like
01:18:13.560 to think
01:18:13.900 that I
01:18:14.200 wouldn't be
01:18:14.540 radicalized,
01:18:15.240 but honestly,
01:18:16.040 I might
01:18:16.460 be.
01:18:17.340 I completely
01:18:18.380 agree with
01:18:18.940 him on
01:18:19.380 that minor,
01:18:20.240 minor point.
01:18:21.180 I don't
01:18:21.780 know what
01:18:22.040 else he's
01:18:22.420 saying.
01:18:23.040 I'm not
01:18:23.660 taking a
01:18:24.120 side.
01:18:24.860 I'm just
01:18:25.500 saying that
01:18:25.980 this is a
01:18:26.920 common sense
01:18:27.580 point,
01:18:28.020 that young
01:18:28.980 people can
01:18:29.520 be radicalized
01:18:30.560 and socialized
01:18:31.980 and culturalized
01:18:33.100 without limit.
01:18:35.240 You can make
01:18:35.680 anybody into
01:18:36.220 anything.
01:18:37.140 Unfortunately,
01:18:38.040 anybody can
01:18:38.620 turn into
01:18:39.020 anything.
01:18:41.180 And so the
01:18:41.840 response was
01:18:42.740 more things
01:18:43.300 about he
01:18:44.040 doesn't
01:18:44.360 understand the
01:18:45.000 history,
01:18:45.660 he doesn't
01:18:46.060 understand that
01:18:46.920 Israel is just
01:18:48.020 protecting itself,
01:18:49.240 he doesn't
01:18:50.000 understand the
01:18:50.640 rights that they
01:18:51.260 have, and
01:18:51.820 blah, blah.
01:18:52.340 And I was
01:18:52.780 just pointing
01:18:53.180 out that while
01:18:54.860 all of those
01:18:55.580 things might
01:18:56.120 well be true,
01:18:57.440 they don't have
01:18:58.480 anything to do
01:18:59.060 with his
01:18:59.340 point, that if
01:19:01.000 you put somebody
01:19:01.640 in that situation,
01:19:02.640 they could get
01:19:03.940 radicalized pretty
01:19:04.740 easily.
01:19:05.740 So I
01:19:06.380 thought, well,
01:19:07.600 wouldn't it be
01:19:08.000 interesting for
01:19:08.700 me, just to
01:19:10.260 be useful, to
01:19:12.120 say, well, I
01:19:12.820 don't think your
01:19:13.320 response is
01:19:15.220 addressing his
01:19:16.020 narrow little
01:19:16.880 point he was
01:19:17.400 making.
01:19:18.460 How do you
01:19:19.060 think that went
01:19:19.600 for me?
01:19:21.360 Oh, my
01:19:22.120 fucking God,
01:19:23.140 did I get
01:19:23.560 attacked by
01:19:24.400 Jew supporters
01:19:27.380 and Israelis,
01:19:29.280 I guess.
01:19:30.080 Oh, my God,
01:19:31.280 it's the worst
01:19:31.820 I've been
01:19:32.120 attacked in, I
01:19:33.280 don't know, a
01:19:34.160 year at least.
01:19:34.920 And none
01:19:36.880 of it was
01:19:37.260 rational.
01:19:39.020 Because all
01:19:40.000 that mattered
01:19:40.460 is they didn't
01:19:41.060 like his
01:19:41.500 opinion on
01:19:42.340 other stuff.
01:19:44.040 And so if I
01:19:44.840 were to say
01:19:45.260 anything that
01:19:46.020 would be, in
01:19:46.860 their view,
01:19:47.340 supportive, you
01:19:48.800 know, I must
01:19:49.300 die, basically.
01:19:50.940 They didn't say
01:19:51.740 die.
01:19:52.540 But wow, the
01:19:54.300 amount of hate
01:19:55.160 that I got for
01:19:56.240 simply pointing
01:19:56.840 out that two
01:19:57.420 people were in
01:19:58.100 a different
01:19:58.480 conversation, that's
01:20:00.520 all I said.
01:20:01.160 you're just
01:20:02.140 not in the
01:20:02.460 same conversation.
01:20:04.360 And it was
01:20:05.360 ugly.
01:20:06.720 So I
01:20:10.040 immediately just
01:20:10.880 deleted it.
01:20:11.760 And I realized,
01:20:12.960 you know what?
01:20:13.900 I really don't
01:20:14.800 give a shit.
01:20:17.120 I don't give a
01:20:17.960 shit at all.
01:20:20.200 I should,
01:20:21.080 maybe.
01:20:22.120 But honestly, I
01:20:23.140 don't.
01:20:23.980 Because the
01:20:24.580 world's a big
01:20:25.060 place.
01:20:25.440 And there are
01:20:25.900 people suffering
01:20:26.680 and doing terrible
01:20:27.460 things all over
01:20:29.060 the place, to
01:20:30.980 each other,
01:20:32.340 reciprocating.
01:20:33.780 Sometimes they
01:20:34.300 have reasons,
01:20:35.240 sometimes they
01:20:35.980 don't.
01:20:36.920 I can't fix the
01:20:37.720 whole world.
01:20:39.940 So I guess my
01:20:40.940 take is that,
01:20:42.020 you know what?
01:20:43.060 If you're going
01:20:43.780 to be a complete
01:20:44.720 asshole to me,
01:20:46.920 simply for making
01:20:47.800 a point that two
01:20:48.640 people were on
01:20:49.340 different subjects,
01:20:50.780 I am so out.
01:20:53.100 So Israel,
01:20:54.760 you could go
01:20:56.000 fuck yourself
01:20:56.740 with all of
01:20:57.800 your supporters.
01:20:58.420 because if
01:20:59.720 even just
01:21:00.260 making a
01:21:00.880 common little
01:21:01.740 point about
01:21:02.940 the conversation
01:21:03.820 is going to
01:21:05.080 make me
01:21:05.520 completely
01:21:06.140 attacked.
01:21:07.160 And remember,
01:21:07.620 the ADL has
01:21:08.260 already called
01:21:08.700 me a Holocaust
01:21:09.560 supporter,
01:21:10.280 which of course
01:21:10.880 is not true.
01:21:12.360 I mean,
01:21:12.880 Jesus fucking
01:21:13.840 Christ,
01:21:14.440 guys.
01:21:15.840 Can you give
01:21:16.620 me a little
01:21:16.960 break?
01:21:17.940 So I'm
01:21:18.800 out.
01:21:19.980 Right?
01:21:20.520 Now, of
01:21:21.120 course, Israel
01:21:22.200 is an ally,
01:21:23.360 so I'm in
01:21:24.980 favor of
01:21:25.640 treating allies
01:21:26.640 like allies.
01:21:27.240 But I'm
01:21:29.000 not in your
01:21:29.440 conversation
01:21:30.000 anymore.
01:21:31.040 I am out.
01:21:32.460 I'm out.
01:21:33.480 If you're
01:21:34.160 worried that
01:21:34.680 the Palestinian
01:21:37.580 protesters are
01:21:39.640 going too far
01:21:40.540 and it's bad
01:21:41.240 for you,
01:21:41.860 I agree with
01:21:42.580 you, and I'm
01:21:43.420 out.
01:21:44.460 I agree with
01:21:45.380 you, but
01:21:46.400 apparently I can't
01:21:47.500 talk on this
01:21:48.080 topic because
01:21:49.420 you're going to
01:21:49.780 attack me.
01:21:50.880 So if you're
01:21:51.720 going to attack
01:21:52.060 me, I'm so
01:21:53.600 fucking out.
01:21:54.400 right?
01:21:55.320 You're on
01:21:55.640 your own
01:21:55.940 now.
01:21:57.340 On your
01:21:58.040 own.
01:21:59.400 So if you
01:21:59.860 can fix
01:22:00.320 that, maybe
01:22:00.980 I'll get
01:22:01.260 back in the
01:22:01.700 conversation.
01:22:02.820 But if all
01:22:03.480 you have is
01:22:04.140 hate for
01:22:05.280 anybody who
01:22:05.900 has any
01:22:06.360 point of
01:22:06.820 view on
01:22:07.180 anything on
01:22:07.780 this topic,
01:22:08.540 you can
01:22:09.280 have your
01:22:09.620 own points
01:22:10.040 of view
01:22:10.340 and you're
01:22:10.660 welcome to
01:22:11.140 it, and
01:22:11.560 I'm out.
01:22:14.140 So don't
01:22:14.700 look for any
01:22:15.220 support from
01:22:16.620 me publicly.
01:22:18.960 Privately, of
01:22:19.580 course, I'll
01:22:19.920 have my
01:22:20.260 opinions, but
01:22:20.980 publicly, you're
01:22:22.720 on your own,
01:22:23.180 Israel.
01:22:24.760 All right.
01:22:26.560 Now, of
01:22:27.140 course, Israel,
01:22:28.480 my haters will
01:22:29.760 interpret that as
01:22:30.600 I just became a
01:22:31.520 Palestinian terrorist,
01:22:32.720 which is my
01:22:33.920 point.
01:22:35.160 That's my
01:22:35.800 point.
01:22:37.200 So maybe
01:22:38.020 clean up that
01:22:38.720 situation and
01:22:39.440 you can get a
01:22:40.000 little more
01:22:40.280 support.
01:22:41.860 All right,
01:22:42.520 that's all I
01:22:42.940 got for now.
01:22:43.920 I'm going to
01:22:44.380 go talk to the
01:22:45.060 locals people
01:22:45.820 privately.
01:22:47.180 I heard James
01:22:48.100 Carville did
01:22:48.760 quite a screed,
01:22:50.720 but I haven't
01:22:51.040 heard it yet.
01:22:52.320 I'll go listen
01:22:53.100 to Carville's
01:22:53.760 rant.
01:22:54.140 It sounds
01:22:54.400 like it's
01:22:54.740 going to be
01:22:54.980 good.
01:22:55.860 All right,
01:22:56.240 everybody.
01:22:58.400 Let's hope
01:22:59.020 that the war
01:22:59.720 in Israel
01:23:00.400 and Iran
01:23:00.800 doesn't kill
01:23:01.340 the United
01:23:01.700 States, and
01:23:03.460 we'll get
01:23:04.000 back to work.
01:23:06.260 I'm going to
01:23:06.600 say hi to
01:23:07.240 the locals
01:23:07.840 people and
01:23:08.660 bye to
01:23:09.240 YouTube and
01:23:10.100 Rumble and
01:23:11.200 X.
01:23:11.820 Thanks for
01:23:12.340 joining.
01:23:13.080 out.
01:23:16.020 Bye.
01:23:17.140 Bye.
01:23:18.000 Bye.
01:23:18.260 Bye.
01:23:18.740 Bye.
01:23:19.300 Bye.
01:23:19.660 Bye.
01:23:19.980 Bye.
01:23:21.040 Bye.
01:23:21.340 Bye.
01:23:21.640 Bye.
01:23:22.100 Bye.
01:23:22.540 Bye.
01:23:23.000 Bye.
01:23:23.100 Bye.
01:23:23.740 Bye.
01:23:28.240 Bye.
01:23:28.260 Bye.
01:23:30.200 Bye.
01:23:30.420 Bye.
01:23:30.720 Bye.
01:23:30.780 Bye.
01:23:31.860 Bye.
01:23:34.380 Bye.
01:23:34.700 Bye.
01:23:35.480 Bye.
01:23:35.580 Bye.
01:23:36.380 Bye.
01:23:37.020 Bye.
01:23:37.720 Bye.
01:23:38.060 Bye.
01:23:38.380 Bye.
01:23:38.860 Bye.
01:23:39.400 Bye.
01:23:39.540 Bye.
01:23:39.960 Bye.
01:23:40.180 Bye.