Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2643 CWSA 10⧸29⧸24

00:00:00.000 you should have them because i'm not such a good investor it turns out i wish i were but i'm not

00:00:10.320 so don't be like me although i must say

00:00:15.040 my early years didn't go well because i did some iris stuff but lately it's been just fine

00:00:22.800 all right we got a show for you today boy do we have a show

00:00:30.400 whoa oh no i have a problem

00:00:34.880 right row scott's got a problem here with his notes that apparently have been printed out of order

00:00:45.600 if i don't fix that it's going to be a really weird day

00:00:51.520 fixed

00:00:52.000 good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called

00:01:10.880 coffee with scott adams and there's never been a better time in the whole stinking world but if

00:01:16.880 you'd like to take your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny

00:01:22.080 shiny human brains all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker gels or stein a canteen jug or

00:01:27.040 flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now

00:01:32.880 for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day and this one goes to steve bannon

00:01:38.800 who is freed from jail i believe at this very moment steve this one's for you from all of us

00:01:46.560 good stuff it's all coming together now can you feel it it's the golden age

00:02:02.960 can't be stopped you can stop it if you tried

00:02:06.080 but you won't well here's some things that are happening yesterday i uh i was a guest on uh

00:02:16.560 jenk's show jenk uger on the young jerks and uh he asked me to explain my support of trump and i did

00:02:27.600 my best in our half hour that we we had together but i would like to just give a public shout out and

00:02:34.480 compliment to jenk for number one uh hosting a number of people who disagreed with him you know

00:02:40.960 separately i was uh i was separate from them but um his uh his treatment of me and my opinion was

00:02:51.280 completely professional and uh admirable i'm glad i did that a lot a lot of you were warning me don't

00:03:00.720 do it he's gonna talk over you and um there was none of that there was no talking over now one of

00:03:08.320 the things i i try to teach my subscribers that i'll tell the rest of you too if somebody's talking

00:03:16.320 over you sometimes that's on them you know there's some people who are just talker overs but it doesn't

00:03:24.000 really happen to me that much and i think it's because you can manage it the first thing you have to

00:03:30.080 do is make sure that you listen to them and not talk over them the second thing is don't say crazy

00:03:35.680 shit if you say crazy stuff people will talk over you if you act like you didn't hear what they just 0.75

00:03:42.080 said they'll say it again and talk over you so there's just some basic communication tools where you 0.99

00:03:48.400 make sure you're listening to them you make sure you hear them and then make sure that you know that

00:03:53.680 they've heard you you pace them a little bit and then the most important part is don't be an npc

00:04:01.360 because if all you're doing is throwing in the the same talking point that everybody said

00:04:06.080 a hundred times today you're gonna get talked over because nobody needs to hear it and people are

00:04:12.240 thinking okay it's just a talking point let me talk over it so you have to be a little bit interesting

00:04:18.400 and different so people want to know how you finish your sentence you've got to give the same

00:04:24.880 consideration to whoever you're talking to that you don't over talk them which by the way i did so i'm

00:04:30.000 going to give uh jank a double compliment because he didn't he didn't once try to over talk me but a

00:04:37.760 couple times he said something that i couldn't let go that i i tried to over talk him a little bit

00:04:42.960 um so great job thank you and uh bannon's out of jail as i mentioned so um we're going to be hearing

00:04:51.200 from him and i feel like it's a sign yeah sure it was scheduled you know we knew for a long time that

00:04:59.120 bannon was going to get out and about now but still it feels like a sign doesn't it can you feel it did

00:05:08.560 you feel every single poll turning in trump's direction did you feel peter navarro get down

00:05:16.320 the jail bannon get out of jail trump's lawfare collapsing

00:05:25.120 biden collapsing you feel it now don't you yeah something big is happening

00:05:31.360 well let's talk about some uh some surveys in science according to medical express there's a

00:05:40.800 survey that finds americans are more afraid today than at any time in recent history and when i say

00:05:47.280 afraid i mean sort of afraid of everything in the world coming to get them now they could have saved

00:05:53.520 some money just by asking scott because i could have told them that and i would tell them why

00:06:00.240 why are people more afraid number one we can see all the problems in our immediate environment

00:06:06.160 which is the way we evolved but now we can see all the problems everywhere in the world

00:06:12.960 i i didn't even know there was a supply chain problem happening uh somewhere in another country

00:06:19.600 that's going to make me starve to death maybe so the fact that you know what where all the problems

00:06:25.920 are and you're predicting problems 80 years in the future with climate change yeah you're simply

00:06:32.240 being exposed to a thousand times more problems how about how about the fact that every time you open your

00:06:40.560 phone the way that anybody gets clicks is by scaring you so not only do you have physical access to a

00:06:47.680 thousand problems but they're going to go right to the top of your attention feed because those are

00:06:52.720 ones that get clicks of course you're more afraid and so as long as hate is being monetized

00:07:00.000 and then the then the last reason we're more afraid is that we understand more

00:07:08.080 if you didn't know anything about the national debt wouldn't you be happier because there's nothing you

00:07:15.600 can do about it so if you just didn't know we did we had any national debt wouldn't you be a little

00:07:21.760 happier yeah so the more you know about how our election systems are run how money flows uh how real

00:07:30.880 decisions are made uh how the medical world decides what's what treatment they're going to give you and

00:07:38.800 what not once you once you learn that stuff the world is scarier because we were you know treated like

00:07:47.680 children for most of you know most of society but lately we're not being treated like children because

00:07:53.600 we have access to the the hard stuff all right there's a study uh by something called cathay

00:08:04.320 cathay really that's the name of the entity that has this cafe that sounds like

00:08:11.680 caffeine but anyway it's about uh brewing up benefits of coffee did you know that coffee

00:08:18.160 among its many many benefits might preserve muscle mass as we age yeah i stopped exercising years ago and

00:08:27.200 just doubled up on coffee and my muscles are just twice as big now so i'm just sucking up coffee to

00:08:35.840 make my brain stronger and my muscles bigger and that's how i'm playing it um there's a study by the

00:08:42.800 university of cambridge that says if you apply magnetic fields to both sides of the brain you get rapid

00:08:49.120 improvement from depression that's amazing so just magnets on both sides of your head

00:08:57.440 well i'm not going to let that science go by without testing it so i got a magnet out of my closet because

00:09:04.480 i have a closet where i keep a lot of magnets yes i have a whole closet has a lot of magnets

00:09:10.640 get over it i like magnets they're really cool look what they do they pull them apart

00:09:18.560 and they come back together you can't do that it's cool so i thought i'd test it see if i get anything

00:09:27.440 now you should not do this at home um so i'm going to do magnetic therapy on my head to see if it cures

00:09:34.320 my depression at all now apparently i need to hold it on both sides that they've done it they've done it

00:09:39.840 they've done it with just one device but there's something about having it on both sides that this

00:09:45.200 seems to help so i'm going to give you a live demonstration see if it cures my depression at all

00:09:53.760 you ready

00:09:54.240 first we'll get the baseline how am i feeling

00:10:04.320 actually pretty good i think the golden age is coming i think trump's going to win i think all

00:10:09.440 of our problems are going to be solved okay so i'm not a really good candidate for testing for

00:10:14.560 depression since i don't have any but maybe maybe you'll make me even happier than i am so

00:10:22.080 hold on we're going to apply the magnets and see

00:10:29.920 all right oh i think it's working

00:10:39.680 i support kamala harris for president

00:10:51.440 what did i just say i don't remember i i don't remember what i just say i hope made sense did it

00:10:57.920 make sense i hope it wasn't crazy yet no don't tell me i screamed out some crazy ship

00:11:07.040 no i don't want to know about that

00:11:11.760 all right well but more importantly scientists have created a revolutionary ultra thin film that absorbs

00:11:17.120 99 of electromagnetic waves did you know that 99 of your electromagnetic waves can be absorbed

00:11:25.520 by a thin film ultra it's ultra thin it's not even them now you want to know something cool

00:11:34.720 if that ultra thin film that absorbs 99 of electromagnetic waves

00:11:41.040 if it also made magnets not not attracted to each other if let's say you put it between two magnets

00:11:49.120 if you can put it between two magnets and make them not do that

00:11:52.320 you would have free energy forever because i've already designed an engine

00:12:00.320 that is only one missing part because nobody's invented it yet

00:12:04.480 a thin a thin barrier that can go between two natural magnets

00:12:10.080 that does not exist there's no such thing as something you can put between two magnets

00:12:14.880 unless it's a magnet itself and then that will just divert the magnetic field but there's nothing

00:12:22.240 there's nothing that's a material that you could put between two magnets to even reduce their amount

00:12:28.640 of attraction even a little bit you know wouldn't you think that oh okay if i put something thick in

00:12:34.240 there that's not magnetic like lead like or a piece of gold or something you'd say well there's no way it's

00:12:41.920 going to be exactly as magnetically attracted but it is it's exactly the same even with like a thick

00:12:51.360 barrier between them this is the thing that got me most interested in understanding reality and that

00:12:58.080 maybe everything we think about reality is wrong how in the world could no barrier slow down magnets

00:13:07.120 it just suggests that what you think is reality is probably way off

00:13:11.920 probably way off

00:13:14.960 here's another study says intelligent men exhibit stronger commitment and lower hostility in romantic

00:13:20.160 relationships according to psi post huh huh how could they have saved some money on this study

00:13:27.120 well you could have asked me because it seems to me that in every situation that requires thinking

00:13:34.080 that work with me here smarter people do well did you know that yeah if you take a smart person and you

00:13:45.040 say hey we're going to try to make some lawyers who does better the smart people you take some smart

00:13:52.240 people and say we're going to make some doctors out of you which ones do better the smart ones that's the 0.99

00:13:58.480 smart ones if you want to do some advanced math do you pick smart people or dumb people to do it no 0.81

00:14:05.280 smart people smart people if you want to have a relationship in which people work at it and

00:14:12.800 figure out the nuances of it and really try to understand each other and try to master the

00:14:18.880 the the skill of communicating in a way that's not offensive and all those other things you have to do to 0.99

00:14:24.800 make a relationship work do you think that smart people do better or do you think the dumb people just 0.83

00:14:32.000 nailing it no it's the smart people it turns out that being intelligent

00:14:38.560 is beneficial in a wide variety of domains i know who knew right who knew i was just saying a

00:14:49.360 interview with uh with conor mcgregor and someone was asking about how he knew how he knew something

00:14:58.480 about how a fight was going to go because apparently he predicted the exact exchange in

00:15:04.160 the fight and then he did it in one and uh you hear conor mcgregor talk and the first thing you say

00:15:11.280 is oh this man does not have a phd the second thing you think is what he's saying is making a lot of

00:15:18.720 sense and then the further the longer he talks the more sense it makes and then you end up saying oh

00:15:25.280 i get it he's really smart

00:15:30.240 that's why he's conor mcgregor there are a lot of guys who are strong and fast and tough and can take

00:15:35.040 a punch but i think he's smarter than them and that's probably why he's you know the richest one who

00:15:42.960 ever did that um all right what else is going on here

00:15:49.520 so i saw a clip uh it was an msnbc clip in which one of the propagandists was uh making the point

00:16:00.960 that if there are five generals that work for trump and all five of them say that trump said bad things

00:16:07.200 behind closed doors what are the odds i mean what are the odds that all five all five generals lied i

00:16:15.840 think it was uh betty assand who was saying that now let me do it the way he was doing it i mean what

00:16:22.800 are the odds all five really really you think all five generals like the most trusted people in our

00:16:31.920 military that's how they became just you think five of them all five of them just made stuff up and lied to

00:16:39.840 the public is that what you think to which i replied on social media today well we had 51

00:16:50.240 intelligence professionals lie about hunter's laptop we had hundreds of government and media pros

00:16:55.680 lie about russia collusion when they knew it wasn't true we had thousands of government and media pros

00:17:01.120 lie about the fine people hoax and dozens of other hoaxes thousands thousands

00:17:06.720 fucking thousands of people lied about the fine people hoax thousands 0.83

00:17:15.360 we had millions of medical professionals lie during the pandemic millions 1.00

00:17:20.320 fucking millions fucking millions lied during the pandemic and we've got millions of scientists lying 0.98

00:17:30.000 right now about the reliability of climate models now i won't get into the you know the debate on climate 1.00

00:17:35.760 science but clearly they're lying about the reliability of the models at the very least they're lying

00:17:41.360 about that so yes five lying generals is the lowest bar you could ever get because first of all generals are

00:17:52.400 waiting for the big paycheck right all the generals want the big paycheck after you know retire it and

00:17:57.520 get on that big board and sell some weapons you know what i mean

00:18:00.880 so first of all i don't trust generals because they didn't get there the normal way they got there

00:18:08.080 through political appointment they are political animals and every other entity that has officials has 0.99

00:18:15.200 lied to us getting five generals to lie the same lie about trump is probably the easiest fucking thing you 0.98

00:18:23.840 could ever do so now i don't trust the five generals and if you give me 25 i'm not going to trust them 0.95

00:18:30.880 either we don't have a world in which we can trust our five generals sorry i don't make the rules

00:18:38.640 that they may be the five generals who have the most influence on whether we go to war but that doesn't

00:18:45.200 mean i have to trust them and i don't ontario the wait is over the gold standard of online casinos has

00:18:54.320 arrived golden nugget online casino is live bringing vegas style excitement and a world-class gaming

00:19:00.320 experience right to your fingertips whether you're a seasoned player or just starting signing up is fast

00:19:06.160 and simple and in just a few clicks you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and

00:19:11.920 top-tier table games make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can

00:19:17.360 turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at golden nugget online casino take a spin on the

00:19:23.600 slots challenge yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action

00:19:29.360 all from the comfort of your own devices why settle for less when you can go for the gold at golden nugget

00:19:35.440 casino gambling problem call connects ontario 1-866-531-2600 19 and over physically present

00:19:43.600 in ontario eligibility restrictions apply see golden nugget casino.com for details please play responsibly

00:19:50.800 well the washington post story is getting more interesting so jeff bezos

00:19:55.040 weighed in as you know the washington post decided it's not going to endorse a candidate even though many

00:20:01.120 of the employees wanted to endorse harris and some of them quit in protest so bezos wrote a letter to his

00:20:08.880 i think it was to his own employees but we got to see it and he said among other things quote it would be

00:20:15.120 easy to blame others for our long and continuing fall in credibility but a victim mentality will not help

00:20:22.800 complaining is not a strategy we must work harder to control what we can control to increase our credibility

00:20:29.520 i'll tell you see that's one two three three sentences can can you tell why he's one of the richest

00:20:42.000 people in the world in three sentences you can tell that jeff bezos is one of the richest people in the

00:20:50.240 world or or if he isn't he's going to be the the level of just pure intelligence

00:20:59.520 that comes out of everything he says it's sort of hard to miss all right let me let me point it out

00:21:05.680 here it would be easy to blame others and have a victim mentality what's that sound like

00:21:15.200 that sounds like everybody was ever successful as soon as you allow the victim mentality and you're dead

00:21:21.840 that's rule number one rule number one is you got to get rid of the victim mentality now that happens to

00:21:27.840 also agree with i'd say more of a republican conservative point of view is he also signaling

00:21:35.600 that he's not going to be a slave to the left i feel like it i feel like he told us two things

00:21:43.840 one is don't be don't have a victim mentality that's good that's a good entrepreneurial management thing to

00:21:49.840 say good leadership secondly he's not your slave that that that's basically declaring his freedom

00:21:59.200 he just said i'm not your slave in a way he said complaining is not a strategy okay that's a good

00:22:08.080 reframe complaining is not a strategy in other words you can do it but i'm not going to listen to it

00:22:15.760 and it won't make any difference if you have an idea i'll listen to an idea and if it's a good idea

00:22:23.840 i might even do it but complaining is not an idea complaining is not a strategy

00:22:33.040 i i want i swear to god i want to go take a job for working for bezos now like i just want to i want

00:22:39.280 to apply for a job at his paper and then he says we must work harder to control what we can control

00:22:46.480 yes control the parts you can control and stop complaining about the things you can't control

00:22:54.560 yes that is perfect no wasted words of that

00:23:00.800 what else he said uh he he pointed out how it used to be that uh the reporting profession the news

00:23:08.800 was the second least respected entity but now congress was always number one least respected

00:23:16.640 but apparently the news business has now surpassed congress as the least respected entity in the

00:23:24.080 united states which he points out he also says that presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales

00:23:33.040 and no undecided voters in pennsylvania's are going to say i'm going with the newspaper a's endorsement

00:23:40.320 none what presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias

00:23:47.440 a perception of non-independence ending them as a principle decision okay do you see what he just did

00:23:58.640 he let he left the world of fact and he went into the world of perception persuasion he said we were

00:24:07.360 we're doing anti-persuasion we're persuading people that were biased because when you when you

00:24:14.160 say this is how you should vote what am i supposed to think i'm supposed to think your entity is biased

00:24:21.600 so even if it's not biased don't do things that make you look biased is that good advice yes yes

00:24:30.880 that's really good advice um is it true though that the newspaper endorsements don't tip the scales

00:24:38.800 um yes and no i'm going to say he's close enough to a yes that i'll give him the yes on that

00:24:51.680 the no would be that there's a group think element that's not addressed uh if you mean if only one

00:24:59.040 newspaper made one recommendation would it make much difference no because other newspapers are doing

00:25:05.200 other things etc but if the newspapers collectively look at the big ones like the washington post and

00:25:12.800 say oh we don't want to be on the other side of the washington post then it might make the majority

00:25:18.720 of newspapers lean in one direction and if the majority is leaning in one direction that's telling

00:25:24.880 you what is acceptable civil behavior so it could collectively but not individually

00:25:35.520 um here's something that i didn't know about

00:25:39.440 um according to uh ian miles chung one of the uh editors that uh the then editor-in-chief was a

00:25:47.920 guy named robert kagan i think he might be one of the ones who just left

00:25:52.160 uh but he's married to victoria newland did you know that that an editor at the washington post

00:26:04.640 was married to the person who is most often identified as the source of all government evil

00:26:14.320 now i don't i don't personally know too much about her i'm just saying if you listen to glenn

00:26:20.080 greenwald or mike benton's talking about you know who's starting the wars and who are the neocons and

00:26:26.320 who are running the plays behind the scenes and you know overthrowing countries and doing all the bad

00:26:32.080 stuff it's always victoria newland she's the major name that comes out of all those conversations as the

00:26:39.280 you know the the center piece of all that now her husband was also the you know one of the main

00:26:47.520 uh decision makers at the washington post which is one of the main newspapers now remember what i always tell you

00:26:57.040 if the only thing you know is what's happening you don't know anything

00:27:01.360 you don't know anything if you know who the players are well suddenly it all makes sense

00:27:08.640 this is one of those cases now i also wondered somebody also mentioned that uh the the bezos uh

00:27:15.360 divorce you know his wife took half his fortune and is pouring it into democrat lefty stuff 1.00

00:27:23.760 um it might be that bezos has some reaction to that meaning that he might feel at the very least he

00:27:34.000 might want to balance it out maybe it's personal we can't read his mind so we don't know that um

00:27:40.720 there's no evidence is personal but if you put any of us in that situation it would be personal

00:27:48.640 am i right if you switch places with bezos and your wife just took you know a hundred billion dollars 1.00

00:27:56.640 from you that that he earned and she didn't and she's pumping it into things that he doesn't agree

00:28:02.160 with you don't think you take that personally that your ex-wife spending hundreds of billions of 1.00

00:28:09.520 dollars on stuff you don't want to be spent on after after you earned it all i would take that personally

00:28:17.520 now that doesn't mean he is there's no evidence of that but wow you put me in that position i don't

00:28:22.480 think i could be objective anyway um there's another newspaper the usa today is joining the

00:28:31.680 washington post and la times in not endorsing a president this time so i thought it would be a

00:28:39.040 good time to give you a little whiteboard explanation of what the media landscape has looked like and

00:28:45.440 what it is becoming now this is the sort of thing that i sometimes forget that normies don't

00:28:52.160 already know now normies would be people who just consume the news um most of my adult career i've

00:28:59.920 been associated with newspapers and publishing so you know i've been sort of semi inside the circle

00:29:06.160 and so i get to see it a little differently than you do so that's why i get to explain it to you

00:29:12.880 searchlight pictures presents the roses only in theaters august 29th from the director of meet the

00:29:18.560 parents and the writer of poor things comes the roses starring academy award winner olivia coleman

00:29:24.640 academy award nominee benedict cumberbatch andy sandberg kate mckinnon and allison janney a hilarious

00:29:30.800 new comedy filled with drama excitement and a little bit of hatred proving that marriage isn't always a bed

00:29:37.120 of roses see the roses only in theaters august 29th get tickets now let's start with the legacy situation

00:29:45.760 legacy meaning how has it been up until now let's get you all centered up there

00:29:55.040 so in the old days which are still partly the current days here's how i learned it when i when

00:30:02.080 i learned about how everything works in the real world there there are or have been two entities called

00:30:08.560 news makers that would be the new york times and the washington post now a news maker

00:30:14.800 is somebody who if they have a major story then all the other news people have to cover it if a local

00:30:22.160 newspaper broke a story the big ones could just ignore it if they wanted to and that happens a lot

00:30:29.520 but if either the new york times or the washington post decides to make a big deal of it then all the

00:30:34.800 others will fall in line because hey news just got made now the the the rest of the media um i will

00:30:44.320 call them boosters so once the big entities tell you this is the news this is what you should think

00:30:50.160 about and talk about then the others say okay this is what everybody's going to think and talk about

00:30:54.880 today so we'll do that and they fall in line now this does not require any phone calls it requires no

00:31:01.600 messaging it literally requires all the other people to just read the other papers which they do

00:31:08.560 pretty much everybody in the news business is going to make sure that they're looking at at least

00:31:14.400 the new york times but certainly the washington post now wall street journal sometimes is in this

00:31:20.960 category but the but the wall street journal is a little more finance oriented and a little more

00:31:27.520 independent a little more balanced doesn't quite fit here but sometimes it does

00:31:34.720 the boosters i would say uh are are not doing a lot of original work they're just copying work from

00:31:40.880 other people and boosting it and then it gets to what i call the propagandists the the people who talk

00:31:47.520 about it and they frame it a certain way and they leave out context so they're they're opinion

00:31:53.440 people but really they're propagandists they're not very few of them are trying to give you their

00:32:02.240 best honest opinion they're promoting a side basically so msnbc doesn't really even pretend to

00:32:10.000 be news they use the news to add opinions to it but they're not really a news organization they're

00:32:15.440 propaganda the atlantic the daily beast rolling stone and pretty much all the pundits that you see all

00:32:21.200 day long are propagandists now under this model how hard is it for the government to control the

00:32:30.080 entire media landscape do you see how easy it is they only need two people all they need is whoever

00:32:39.840 makes the decisions at the new york times and whoever makes the decisions at the washington post

00:32:45.120 if you want to if you want to learn more about that uh i can't remember the movie but meryl i think

00:32:50.960 meryl streep played the uh the owner of the washington post in kennedy's era i forget what that movie is

00:32:59.840 but there there's a movie you can find that's only a few years old um and it's fascinating because you

00:33:06.400 could see for example that uh kennedy would invite like the top people who owned the newspapers on his yacht

00:33:13.200 imagine imagine being a newspaper professional and somebody as charismatic as a kennedy invites you to

00:33:23.040 be their personal friend and spend the weekend on their yacht what are you going to write about them

00:33:30.560 right it is completely corrupt that they should not be riding anybody's yachts if they're going to

00:33:37.120 write about them so in the old days the government um in that case i don't think it was kennedy so much

00:33:44.640 it might have been the deep state that killed them that was running things but all you had to do was get

00:33:50.960 literally just two people and how hard is it to get two people on your side if you're a government well

00:33:58.080 you have all of the bribery possibilities all the jailing possibilities all of the you know access to

00:34:04.640 resources access to interviews you have all the power so there is there's no problem at all to get two

00:34:11.600 people to do whatever you want if you're the government right any government can make any two

00:34:16.160 people do anything they want but enter elon musk

00:34:22.400 and look what happens here's a model of how things are evolving you got fake news

00:34:36.880 and then you got some real news and it's coming from everywhere so it's coming from not only the

00:34:41.840 news makers but everywhere else and a lot of independent journalists now we have much more

00:34:47.360 far more independent journalists but both the fake stuff and the real stuff is being fed into the x

00:34:52.640 platform and then it gets um light basically the light is shined on it and then the fake stuff gets

00:35:03.120 called out not as fast as i'd like but it does get called out and the truth gets essentially adjudicated

00:35:11.760 through x and everybody pays attention to x if they're in the media so it makes a big difference

00:35:19.680 now they don't get the truth every time sometimes it's wrong but they get a lot closer than the media

00:35:27.040 that is designed to be fake yeah the stuff on the other side of the whiteboard is designed to create

00:35:33.200 fake news to hold the country together and have one narrative it's designed to be fake

00:35:37.840 fake with a little little real stuff sprinkled in but uh the musk uh x platform is putting the truth

00:35:47.680 back into the hands of the public because the public fights it down on x and something like the truth

00:35:53.600 emerges now enter jeff bezos what he says is he wants to add credibility and he wants to add some

00:36:06.000 conservative voices what does that sound like to you what what if what if he takes it to the extreme

00:36:14.640 and actually gets rid of all the um people who are just propagandists and instead replaces them with

00:36:21.280 people who are um credible but can represent the left and then some people who are credible who could

00:36:30.640 represent the right and then maybe have them fight it out in you know within their internal pages to give

00:36:37.600 you another sense of truth now here's the problem suppose he succeeds and i do expect he will because

00:36:49.040 he has the resources the brains the energy the the magic the skill everything so what what if the washington

00:36:56.320 post gets resurrected from the uh the trash heap of history where it is now and becomes an actual

00:37:04.080 place where people go okay okay i could go to x and get a version of the truth or i could go to washington

00:37:12.240 post and get a version of the truth but they're both pretty good because they're both trying to get the truth

00:37:18.320 do you see the problem yet here's my problem they're both in the space business in a big way rockets

00:37:34.160 they kind of have to do what the government wants them to do

00:37:39.520 they have two businesses oh really you could argue all of their businesses are completely dependent

00:37:44.960 and the government's not taking them down so are we really safe when billionaires

00:37:54.800 who depend on the government for some huge part of their business life are the ones you know designing

00:38:02.560 the systems of truth i'm not terribly comfortable with that you know if you tell me that musk is one 1.00

00:38:10.400 source and then there are other sources but they come from all different kinds of worlds

00:38:16.000 i would say oh that's good that's a competitive market so i won't worry about this one person having

00:38:21.680 a connection to the government you know and having to get approval for rockets and stuff like that

00:38:27.440 because they're they're non-rocket people also involved but what if there aren't

00:38:32.560 what what what if the truth becomes two billionaires who depend on the government

00:38:39.120 to say yes or no on their rockets that's not exactly where you want to be with your information

00:38:45.120 network so you you know it's good to have them but i think you'd want a lot more so that's where we're

00:38:51.600 headed and it also tells you why the government and lots of people the democrats especially are panicked

00:38:57.680 about x because it's creating for the first time an alternative path of news and knowledge

00:39:07.520 so that's happening well the uh joke by tony uh what's his name i can't remember the comedian who

00:39:18.240 told the off-color joke at the trump rally in madison square garty hinchley tony hinchley is that his name

00:39:27.040 i've never seen him work actually um but apparently the democrats have succeeded in making his joke

00:39:36.560 uh a national problem and uh getting all the puerto rican americans all angry so that they'll vote 0.98

00:39:44.160 against him and stuff um but now trump is going to be in pennsylvania in an area that apparently has a

00:39:52.720 sizable puerto rican american well puerto ricans are americans but puerto rican population and

00:40:02.960 people are asking him to apologize now this will be fun so you got trump the man who doesn't apologize

00:40:11.680 and you've got a few days before the election it's really tight and an important group of potential voters

00:40:19.360 is saying we need an apology and they're asking the man who doesn't apologize but maybe he needs to

00:40:27.280 to win the election what do you do what do you do well here's what i'd do everybody's going to give him

00:40:36.400 advice um but trump's going to do it trump's way and so far that's worked for him and he's knocking on the

00:40:44.080 door to a second uh second term so i don't think that we should be so arrogant as to imagine that

00:40:51.360 if we gave him a suggestion on how to handle it that our suggestion would be better than whatever

00:40:56.000 the hell he's going to do but it's recreationally uh fun to come up with what would you do if he were

00:41:03.200 in that situation so this will be more what i would do what he does is going to be better it's going to

00:41:09.040 be the trump thing but i'll tell you what i'd do i'd do something like this if i were the man who

00:41:14.880 couldn't apologize or not or don't want to and um i had this situation i i'd listen to the question

00:41:23.200 and be blah blah blah you know do you apologize for this blah blah blah here's what i'd say i don't

00:41:29.680 think it's a good idea for me to police comedy first sentence i don't think it's a good idea for

00:41:37.280 me to police comedy it's not really what you want your government to do in fact you probably want your

00:41:43.280 government to get as far away from that as possible because free speech is where you don't want me

00:41:48.400 me so i'll give you my opinion but don't ask me to please police comedy if you're asking was a

00:41:57.360 a mistake to let that joke go off in public oh i think we all agree on that yes that that wasn't

00:42:04.400 ideal so we can agree that a mistake was made but we don't police comedy comedy is not about hitting a

00:42:11.920 home run every time and we don't expect it to so policing a bad joke or a joke that went too far

00:42:19.440 that's not really where you want me to be involved but i'll tell you what i will do one of the things

00:42:25.520 that tony brought up is the fact that there's an enormous problem in puerto rico that i don't think

00:42:31.120 all of you were aware of which is partly why people are angry there is a massive um environmental

00:42:38.240 problem in puerto rico that's not being addressed so i'd like to announce today that should i become

00:42:45.440 president i'm going to make that a priority and we're going to clean that up so here's the apology

00:42:50.880 i'll give you i'm going to clean up your island hinge cliff is his name 1.00

00:43:00.400 tony hinge cliff sorry if i had the name wrong so how's that because you know what the president

00:43:08.640 should be promising puerto rico to help them clean up that ship they should help them clean up i mean

00:43:15.600 i i had no idea it was so bad my my entire attitude about puerto rico went from i don't know anything

00:43:22.000 about puerto rico to why aren't we doing more to help puerto rico who did that tony hinchcliffe did

00:43:28.880 why are we talking about uh why am i talking about i think we should put more money into puerto rico

00:43:37.040 a comedian so trump trump can be right twice he can say i'm not going to police comedy but you know

00:43:45.360 what he did raise an issue that's important enough i think we should all care about it why don't we help

00:43:50.400 puerto rico and just don't police comedy

00:43:55.920 what do you think that's a winning message i'm not going to police comedy i'm going to fix your island

00:44:02.480 what else do you want right what else do you want

00:44:11.200 nothing that's everything you want

00:44:13.280 what else you probably heard that uh kamala harris and she was talking to governor whitmer

00:44:27.840 and they did a little uh stage scene where they're sitting at a bar pretending to drink beers and

00:44:33.200 saying stuff and um harris said something about they need to get men but here's my point yes it's

00:44:41.600 true that the harris campaign needs to get more men if they want to win but why are men the only

00:44:50.000 demographic that don't get pandered every other group gets some pandering i i literally just suggested

00:44:56.960 some pandering for puerto rico you know black americans get some pandering women get some pandering 1.00

00:45:06.640 uh hispanics get some pandering where's my pandering i i'm just asking for a little pandering 1.00

00:45:14.800 i feel like my demographic men get lectured to everybody else gets bribed but i get shamed and lectured to 0.97

00:45:25.280 how about a little pandering why don't you get rid of dei pander me a little bit well how about that

00:45:40.000 here's my uh lesson to you on how persuasion and intelligence are not related in the way you think

00:45:46.880 they would you know earlier in my program here i mentioned how intelligence helps you with everything

00:45:55.280 here's my exception it doesn't help you with persuasion if somebody's brainwashing you they

00:46:02.960 can do it just as well sometimes better if you're smarter and part of the reason is that the smart

00:46:10.640 people are confident if you give me somebody confident i can really brainwash them because

00:46:16.880 they'll be confident that they weren't brainwashed someone who who knows that you have some superior

00:46:22.480 let's say knowledge or intelligence and and you're trying to persuade them they're going to think

00:46:28.560 that maybe you did so they're going to you know try to just reject everything because they're not

00:46:33.600 confident that they can sort out what's true and what's not so as sort of a default they're just like

00:46:39.680 i don't trust you everything you say and that can work out pretty well actually so smart people are

00:46:46.160 really easy to brainwash i'm going to give you an example

00:46:48.640 now i'm going to use an example from somebody that i like and respect

00:46:56.000 because i think that's important because otherwise you would get the message oh but really you're making 0.98

00:47:00.720 fun of this person they're really kind of stupid but they you know maybe they got a few smart things 0.99

00:47:05.520 but they're kind of dumb no this is a genuinely smart person smart from top to bottom all right i'm 1.00

00:47:12.480 talking about paul graham now he would be a famous investor silicon valley type forever um and i think 0.99

00:47:20.800 everybody would agree that he would be one of the one of the smart people in silicon valley now being one

00:47:26.880 of the smart people in silicon valley is way better than being one of the smart people almost everywhere

00:47:34.400 else right so we're talking about way smart right not normal smart we're in the the upper levels of

00:47:42.480 smart and he's decided he likes kamala harris as his first choice for president and in and of itself

00:47:52.240 that's just a difference of opinion so if if there were no reasons that went with it then i'd say okay

00:47:58.800 just a difference of opinion and i would ask myself is there something wrong with my opinion

00:48:06.720 um i would wonder that because he's smart enough that if he disagrees with me the first thing i say

00:48:14.000 is oh maybe i should rethink this you know if elon musk disagreed with me on something important 0.98

00:48:21.680 my first impression would not be well yeah elon musk is dumb

00:48:25.280 my first impression would be oh maybe maybe i should rethink this if if naval 0.68

00:48:33.680 ravikant came up with an opinion i didn't agree with which i think has never happened but if he ever did

00:48:41.200 the first thing i'd say is oh i must be wrong and then i would definitely you know dig into whatever

00:48:47.120 the hell he was talking about to figure out why i was wrong so i was paul graham is one of the people

00:48:52.400 that if he disagrees with you your first instinct should be what's wrong with me and then you

00:49:00.240 understand him a little better right so there's some people your first instinct should be what's

00:49:05.280 wrong with me if they disagree so here's something he said and my point here is that brainwashing

00:49:12.160 and intelligence unrelated brainwashing will go right through intelligence like it didn't exist 0.74

00:49:19.120 he said quote uh talk about trump he said the worst thing he did in my opinion

00:49:24.160 was when he tried to remain in power after he lost the 2020 election he knew he lost but he called mike

00:49:30.240 pence and blah blah blah where did he get the information that he lost the 2020 election

00:49:37.680 where's that come from we don't we don't have any way to know that and and we certainly don't know

00:49:44.400 that trump knew he lost because half of the country thinks he didn't lose and why would his opinion be

00:49:52.560 different than half of the country that agrees with him i'm going to be going over some election

00:49:59.520 irregularities next it'll be next in my presentation here but anybody who has been brainwashed into thinking

00:50:09.280 that we know who won any of our elections our our system is not even designed so you could know

00:50:16.800 it's intentionally designed and i say intentionally because you wouldn't keep it the same way for

00:50:21.920 decades and decades unless you meant it it's intentionally designed so you can't tell who won

00:50:28.640 now how would paul graham not know that now the answer is brainwashing

00:50:35.440 how would he think that he could read trump's mind and even though half of the country looked at

00:50:40.880 exactly what trump's looking at and came to the same conclusion as trump that trump alone would be the

00:50:46.880 one that's lying but 80 million other people who have exactly the same opinion because they looked at

00:50:53.760 exactly the same outcomes they're not lying but he's the only one how would you know that so these are

00:51:03.040 both examples of thinking past the sale so paul graham is thinking past the sale of what did trump do

00:51:13.360 once he knew he lost the election that is not the situation nobody's smart if they were working

00:51:21.280 without brainwashing as a force nobody's smart would take as an assumption that we could know how the

00:51:27.840 election went and that it was fair for sure we do know that the courts which are not designed to tell

00:51:33.600 us if an election is fair or not did not find anything wrong now uh cenk mentioned that yesterday

00:51:40.800 when i talked to him he said that the courts didn't find anything wrong 60 cases or something

00:51:46.480 if i'd had another 60 seconds to talk to him on that i would have said but nobody thinks courts have the

00:51:53.680 tools to know whether an election is rigged nobody thinks that if a state actor got into the machines

00:52:02.640 changed the result what's the court going to do nobody even brings them that case the court never

00:52:09.040 hears of it neither do you because the state actor was good at hacking so how do you catch the thing

00:52:14.720 that nobody catches it doesn't make any sense that you could have certainty about the election outcome

00:52:21.120 nobody can and you definitely can't have certainty about what trump's thinking about it

00:52:26.080 and if you're going to guess what he was thinking about it the smarter guess is that his guess matches

00:52:31.280 the 80 million people who who have the same bias that they wanted him to win and watch the same outcomes

00:52:39.120 they'll watch the same the same happenings

00:52:43.520 so paul graham if i took a iq test and he took an iq test he would beat me he's smarter than i am

00:52:50.880 he knows a lot more than i do about business and lots of other things but uh this is a case of 0.94

00:52:56.480 brainwashing so if you looked at this and you said but but scott he he's dumb on this one little area 0.94

00:53:03.200 nope nope there's no lack of intelligence displayed this is pure brainwashing and you can see that it's 0.89

00:53:13.120 it got everybody it tell me the truth who besides me did you ever hear saying that we don't have the

00:53:24.400 ability to know who won you've heard people say oh it was definitely rigged which we don't have evidence

00:53:32.960 of and you've heard people say it definitely was not rigged which we could not ever know who besides me

00:53:40.640 you said no if you believe you have certainty about the outcome you're being brainwashed from one side

00:53:47.280 or the other it doesn't matter where your certainty is coming from but if you have certainty about a

00:53:52.560 system that was designed to uh prevent you from having certainty uh that's brainwashing yeah it's very

00:54:02.480 clean and clear this is one of those cases where you don't have to wonder you know is something else

00:54:08.000 going on no this is pure pure effective brainwashing and it took me a long time to figure out how to get

00:54:16.800 out of it it wasn't until i realized wait a minute nobody knows if any of our elections are fair how could

00:54:26.000 they because how could you know that somebody did something and got away with it getting away with it is

00:54:31.760 getting away with it so anyway uh us intel according to wired magazine are the intelligence people in the

00:54:43.760 usa say that the threats of the election are going to come from the inside and that we have insider threats

00:54:52.000 now an insider threat would be somebody involved with the election who decided to cheat

00:54:57.920 okay so the u.s intelligence

00:55:05.520 is saying that our elections are vulnerable to insiders cheating

00:55:12.960 now if it were true that you couldn't cheat you know without being easily and immediately caught

00:55:20.400 would the u.s intelligence people say it's our biggest risk

00:55:24.400 risk if they knew it was no risk at all and you would be caught immediately if you tried to do

00:55:29.840 something as an insider obviously it's a real risk they wouldn't bring it up if it weren't a real risk

00:55:37.280 i mean why would they it would be opposite to their interests so okay so even our intelligence people are

00:55:46.320 saying that we can't know if we got hacked

00:55:53.360 because if we could know then they would say don't worry about it if anybody tries to cheat you know

00:55:59.440 we'll catch it immediately but they didn't say that they said it's the biggest risk

00:56:05.280 if it's the biggest risk they're also telling us they can't catch it immediately and if they don't catch it

00:56:10.960 immediately that's the same as never catching it because we're going to swear in the president and

00:56:15.920 once the president's and all the investigations end because it's just better that way

00:56:23.040 also from wired cyber criminals pose a greater threat of disrupting u.s elections so the idea that

00:56:31.600 foreign adversaries would try to hack our elections wired is downplaying that although the foreign adversaries

00:56:39.680 are definitely trying to you know uh they're trying to be involved but not as uh grossly as changing

00:56:47.280 the vote count so it seems like they might be trying to influence and you know send in some memes and

00:56:53.200 you know maybe maybe game some things around the edges but it but according to wired and i agree with

00:56:59.760 this by the way it's less likely that china or russia for example or iran would hack into a machine

00:57:08.640 change the vote and and hope they could get away with that because i think they i think they would

00:57:14.880 say that the united states would take that as way over the line right it's one thing if we find that

00:57:21.840 russia did some memes we're like oh don't do those memes putin you and your memes but then we look at the 0.98

00:57:29.920 memes and they didn't make any difference because they were so stupid and they weren't viral so we're 0.84

00:57:34.800 like okay memes but if we found out that russia actually got into a machine and actually changed 0.98

00:57:42.880 the results and it actually changed the outcome of the election that would look like war so i agree

00:57:50.720 with wired that it's unlikely that they're that their adversaries would do that but um cyber criminals

00:57:59.920 might meaning that if you were let's say just a rich person and you wanted to rig the election

00:58:07.360 could you find a cyber criminal who would do it just for money they don't even care who wins and the

00:58:14.480 answer is i would assume so are you telling me that a billionaire and the best uh you know black hat

00:58:23.520 hackers can't hack our election systems with any of any amount of money to you know be able to obtain

00:58:31.040 and test systems you're telling me that a billionaire and the best hackers in the world

00:58:35.840 wouldn't be able to get into our systems of course they would of course they would and would we know

00:58:43.600 if they did of course we would not necessarily we might but not necessarily so so you got that risk

00:58:54.560 so you got the risk of the insiders coordinating you've got the risk of the cyber criminals and the

00:59:00.000 billionaires or whoever they're working for um and these risks are coming from our own government

00:59:07.840 this is not me the podcaster saying oh i think there's a risk this is our own intelligence people

00:59:13.840 saying here are two risks that if things went wrong we wouldn't necessarily catch it

00:59:23.200 bank more encores when you switch to a scotia bank banking package

00:59:26.720 learn more at scotia bank dot com slash banking packages conditions apply scotia bank you're richer

00:59:34.160 than you think then we've got uh let's see according to the griot we had some uh uh flaming ballot boxes

00:59:45.680 so um where'd that happen uh in oregon and in the state of washington a couple of uh

00:59:53.920 ballot boxes were set on fire now you might say to me scott it's only a few ballot boxes

01:00:00.720 and that's probably true and probably wouldn't change uh um probably wouldn't change the election

01:00:07.520 much but uh my understanding is there's also a lawsuit is it in georgia to prevent cameras on on

01:00:18.480 uh drop boxes why would they want to prevent camera surveillance on drop boxes i think the argument is

01:00:26.800 it would decrease votes

01:00:31.520 from who who exactly would be worried about dropping their own ballot and maybe their spouse's ballot or

01:00:39.040 even their neighbors too in the drop box because it's being watched by cameras do you think somebody

01:00:45.360 would not vote the entire world is watched by cameras obviously if you're trying to get the

01:00:51.360 cameras away from the drop boxes you think that they're corrupt now this is not a suggestion but

01:00:58.640 it's a semi-prediction there may be in this country enough people who don't want drop boxes to be part of 0.95

01:01:05.840 the election that they will make them not part of the election by setting them on fire in in numbers big

01:01:11.920 enough to remove it from the system how many drop boxes would have to blow up or catch on fire before

01:01:19.760 the entire election would be canceled we got two how about ten what what if ten drop boxes caught on fire

01:01:31.360 because they weren't being monitored by cameras so anybody could just drop walk up with uh

01:01:37.600 some some fluid in the match and drop it in and boom uh suppose suppose around the entire country

01:01:45.600 ten drop boxes caught on fire and maybe even some of the people got arrested

01:01:53.280 would ten be enough to say oh stop the election probably not probably not because somebody would say well

01:02:00.400 this drop box had only this many the election was this money what happens if it's a hundred

01:02:07.440 if a hundred drop boxes got set on fire would the election be cancelled

01:02:17.600 maybe maybe if a thousand of them got caught on fire would they cancel the election yes yes they would

01:02:25.600 do is it possible that a thousand drop boxes could be set on fire if the results of this election don't

01:02:34.320 look um like they were legit yes i don't recommend it you're going to go to jail for a long time if you do

01:02:44.640 this do not do not do not commit any crimes don't do anything violent don't set anything on fire

01:02:54.560 but we live in a world in which two of these have been set on fire and once the idea gets out there

01:03:00.480 it's hard to put it back in the box right so you could easily imagine that there will be a vigilante

01:03:07.920 who says i'm going to personally get rid of mail-in uh drop boxes and i'm going to drive around the country

01:03:17.280 and just for the cost of gasoline some for my car and some for the drop boxes and matches i'm going to

01:03:24.880 get rid of drop boxes forever and you just drive around and set them on fire for for two weeks

01:03:30.160 and it probably probably would take it out of the system so that might happen but um so that's a

01:03:40.400 small problem that could become a big problem and again don't do that don't do that very bad idea

01:03:48.880 uh new york in new york county in pennsylvania there's a report that 421 mail-in ballots

01:03:55.360 um may have gone to the wrong addresses well that's not too many right 421 but that's just

01:04:02.880 the ones got reported if over 400 got reported how many were not reported it's going to be a multiple

01:04:11.920 right five to one two thousand maybe two thousand votes that might not be right

01:04:21.920 all right uh let's see um also in uh york county according to the george account one of my favorite

01:04:32.160 accounts on x you should follow george um there is they received thousands of potentially fraudulent

01:04:39.600 voter registration forms from some third party group first happened in lancaster county and now in

01:04:46.560 new york county george asks what's going on uh george also says he's getting information from sources

01:04:55.440 that says it's happening in more counties and that these seem like obvious frauds well i don't know

01:05:04.400 maybe maybe it is but paul graham is sure that our our last election was fine

01:05:10.960 um in virginia the governor wants to take 6600 uh non-citizens off the voter rolls but because

01:05:21.920 there's a technicality that is too close to elections has to be within uh outside of 90 days that the

01:05:28.720 government's not going to do it so now we know for sure that there are at least 6600

01:05:35.680 non-citizens that if they had a ballot they could vote and probably wouldn't get caught 0.99

01:05:45.040 there's 6 000 a lot in virginia i don't know uh then we've got yeah three of the states uh were suing

01:05:55.280 to prevent drop box surveillance george george is one of them i guess uh so that's sketchy uh over in

01:06:04.000 berkeley my neck of the woods uh according to the sfist um some mail-in ballots uh were robbed by a mail

01:06:14.800 carrier and didn't make it to their destination now the current thinking is that it wasn't that that

01:06:22.880 wasn't about the election it was just somebody stole a mail truck maybe for with the other stuff in it

01:06:28.640 but the stuff's happened so that all looks like uh maybe not the most secure election system but but

01:06:39.840 really the elections are determined by the news i would say could you say that's true so just as i

01:06:47.600 showed you the old legacy news system the government would control the news makers new york times and

01:06:54.960 washington post they control all the other news and the news tells you who to vote for doesn't it

01:07:02.320 now if if the news doesn't care or let's say the people in charge don't care who gets in because

01:07:07.600 they're they're both going to be easy to work with then you get this 50 50 election and then you

01:07:13.760 maybe it doesn't matter who wins but but according to uh mrc newsbusters uh television hits on trump

01:07:22.800 were 85 negative news versus 78 positive for harris if that's the only thing you knew

01:07:31.360 that one of the candidates had overwhelmingly negative news coverage and one had overwhelmingly

01:07:36.400 positive that's a rigged election right because our information comes from the news

01:07:43.920 the news determines how we vote so if the news is rigged and this is clear evidence of a rigged news

01:07:52.080 then it's a rigged election because you if you say that the news business is separate from the

01:07:58.880 election business so it doesn't matter what happens in the news business that's not about the election

01:08:05.040 rigging well that's not true the news is the election the reason that the news entities

01:08:12.080 do the debates are because the news is part of the election our system the news is part of the election

01:08:18.960 so if the news is rigged the election is rigged that's how it works if the news tells you the

01:08:26.640 the hunter laptop is fake well that is a rigged election you know you could tell me but technically

01:08:34.240 it's a different industry it's a different industry the news is separate no they're not they're completely

01:08:40.640 connected to the people who are running in the elections there's no separation there

01:08:45.440 let's see uh then we've got this uh undercover video stephen crowder's got another in the undercover

01:08:53.200 video of what is alleged to be a democrat operative who's explaining to somebody who's got an undercover

01:09:02.400 camera uh how they democrats allegedly stole the 2020 election in georgia uh and he talks about kicking

01:09:10.880 out the gop poll watchers he talks about uh ballot harvesting and the uh 2000 mules thing

01:09:17.440 etc here's my take on that not credible sorry not credible it sounds like somebody who watches television

01:09:31.600 and then pretended that they knew this stuff on their own it's just all the television stuff

01:09:38.000 if he came up with something that wasn't already on television

01:09:40.560 but it just sounds like he's bragging or making it up so i can't say that i can't say that it's all

01:09:47.520 false that i don't know because that would be a level of certainty that's inapplicable but if you're

01:09:53.760 asking me if i think they have the goods my answer is no this does not look like the goods this is closer

01:10:01.280 to the kraken meaning that it's closer to something that seems artificially too good to be true

01:10:08.000 and then if you go out there and say it then a week later you find out that this guy's just a prankster

01:10:13.200 or something so i'm gonna say don't believe that one um yeah um i should interview dinesh well i think

01:10:25.120 the 2000 mule thing fell apart because they didn't have video that supported the claim and the people who

01:10:32.480 looked at the phone traffic said it was uh too it was too um unreliable to make the claim that's all i

01:10:42.320 know so there would be no point in interviewing him because that's the whole story right there anyway

01:10:51.840 um trump said something that's just magnificently trumpian because he likes to tease things and make

01:10:59.120 you all curious so he said that the uh madison square garden thing he said uh donald trump uh t well

01:11:06.240 he he teased that he and matt gates share a quote little secret that's set to give republicans an edge

01:11:15.360 saying quote our secret is making waves we'll reveal it once the race is won

01:11:21.760 and i think our little secret we're going to do really well with the house

01:11:25.360 our little secret is having a big impact he and i have it and we'll tell you what it is when the race

01:11:31.040 is over huh so he has a little he has a little secret that involves

01:11:38.960 i assume elections for the house what could that be uh i have i'm going to speculate just for fun

01:11:49.040 i'm going to speculate that there might be some democrats who are going to win their election

01:11:53.840 and then switch to republican because i can't think of anything else that would fit the hint

01:12:02.160 and you saw that there were at least two republic two democrats who were running as democrats who were

01:12:08.640 using their agreement with trump as part of their argument for winning as democrats you're aware of

01:12:15.920 that right so if you've got any democrats that are pretending to agree with trump to get elected

01:12:21.440 i would say they're at least on the fence about whether they should be democrats at all could it be

01:12:29.920 that the thing that matt gates knows is that he's talked to several of them and he's already convinced

01:12:35.440 them to turn republican you know maybe they've got some deals for some you know good committees or

01:12:42.320 something i don't know what you can offer them but it could be that if the election comes down close in

01:12:48.240 terms of democrats and republicans that there's going to be a second wave where some of the democrats

01:12:54.320 that just came in just flip over to republican and the house flips now that would be a hell of a secret

01:13:02.560 that would fit the category of it's already happening because all the mechanisms would be in place

01:13:09.280 and it would fit that it's a secret they wouldn't want to talk about it until the people got elected

01:13:15.040 and matt gates would be an obvious person who could be potentially a front person for that sort of thing

01:13:23.040 and uh could be big and involve the house so that's my recreational guess if i had to put money on it

01:13:34.000 i would not

01:13:37.200 so i wouldn't bet on myself because there are too many possibilities of what it could be but i'll throw

01:13:42.880 one out because it fits all the it fits the hints so it's just fun all right uh if you didn't see a

01:13:51.520 panel discussion on cnn that almost came to blows you really have to watch it uh because it had uh so

01:13:58.800 cnn had uh what they call a pro-israeli analyst ryan gurdusky and what they call an anti-israel analyst at least

01:14:08.240 who whoever wrote this post whose name i forgot to write down um and i guess

01:14:17.520 i guess uh let's see meddy made a reference to the madison square garden thing as a hitler kind of a

01:14:26.400 situation and i guess gurdusky did not like being lumped in with hitler and so in response he

01:14:35.520 he he asked meddy hassan uh he hopes his his beeper doesn't explode

01:14:45.360 and now a beeper exploding would be a suggestion that you're a hezbollah terrorist

01:14:53.120 uh i think meddy said he was a palestinian but you know no indication he has any terrorist connections

01:15:00.240 but uh here's my take if you call anybody a nazi who is not a nazi they can call you anything they

01:15:09.520 want have i told you the rules about self-defense there are no rules of self-defense there are laws

01:15:19.120 if you break a law you go to jail uh even if it's self-defense if uh if you do something that would kill

01:15:27.120 you professionally well there goes your job but there's no there's no ethical or moral limit on

01:15:35.760 what you can do in self-defense there are laws but no ethical or moral limits so if you go on television

01:15:43.120 and somebody says you're a nazi and you respond by uh accusing them of being a terrorist

01:15:49.920 all good all good all good that is absolutely acceptable not true by the way i i should remind

01:16:00.320 you that there's no evidence that meddy hassan has any you know connections that you should worry about

01:16:06.720 but yes you can say that he could call him a pedo if he wanted again he'd probably get sued if he did

01:16:14.480 that but there's no rules if somebody calls you a nazi on television you can go you can unload

01:16:23.600 your entire verbal clip verbal verbal yeah don't do anything physical

01:16:31.520 that's the rule i i think we just have to agree on that there are some rules that if it's self-defense

01:16:38.000 remember it gurdusky wasn't the one who started the name calling if he had started it i'd have a

01:16:44.480 different opinion but if so if he's sitting there and he's invited on a show and somebody wants to

01:16:49.520 call him a nazi on the national tv show you can say anything you want including calling somebody a

01:16:55.680 terrorist absolutely he had it coming but it's not true and that ladies and gentlemen is everything i had

01:17:06.240 to say today so i'm going to talk to the uh people on the locals platform by the way if you're not on

01:17:13.920 locals you don't get to see all of my comics um that are better than ever and a lot of the political

01:17:21.360 stuff that i don't do on here and we do the evening show to cure your loneliness uh i can cure your

01:17:29.760 loneliness with the man cave um live streams every night so uh i'm gonna say hi to them

01:17:37.440 and i'm gonna say bye to youtube and rumble and x thanks for joining we'll see

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 29, 2024

Episode 2643 CWSA 10⧸29⧸24

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript