Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2646 CWSA 11⧸01⧸24

00:00:00.000 Well, the stock market's up a little bit, trying to make up for yesterday, which was

00:00:04.000 not so good, not so good. How was everybody's Halloween? I was giving out candy last night.

00:00:12.780 It was a smaller crowd than usual. Makes me wonder if kids are eating less candy.

00:00:20.200 I wonder what's behind that. Way fewer people. In fact, every year has been fewer in my neighborhood,

00:00:26.800 but it was still fun. But I want to tell you the funniest part of it and also give you a tip for

00:00:33.540 your next Halloween. So years ago, I came up with the idea because it was suggested to me by

00:00:43.940 the woman I was with at the time. Who was it? I think it was my first wife, Shelly,

00:00:50.740 that we should provide water, you know, little bottles of water to the trick-or-treaters

00:00:57.500 because they would be thirsty. Now, the first time I did it, I thought to myself,

00:01:02.740 you don't need to give them little waters. Come on. But the kids went crazy for the waters because

00:01:09.740 they were just like so thirsty because they're eating candy and running around all night.

00:01:13.860 So did it again every year. So every year it became more and more popular. And then my current

00:01:20.740 house doing the same thing. And a number of the kids would come back like two and three times to

00:01:27.780 get the waters and they'd be so happy. Thank you for the waters. But the best part, you know,

00:01:33.940 just in case you're thinking that the young people are all terrible. You know, I live in a

00:01:43.860 place. You know, it's just a really nice place. And I would say in terms of diversity,

00:01:54.100 I think 85% of the trick-or-treaters were non-white in my neighborhood, mostly Asian and Indian American.

00:02:04.520 A lot of black. And for some reason, a relatively tiny percentage of white to trick-or-treaters.

00:02:12.340 But here's the story. Some of the maybe 14-year-old or so teens are there and they see them offering

00:02:21.540 water. And it's a big bunch of them. They come at once and they're all like, oh, water, we're so good.

00:02:27.080 And I swear to God that the kids start yelling, respect. We have so much respect for you for

00:02:34.640 having water available. And then they started chanting. I swear this happened. As they're

00:02:42.280 walking away from my house, they're chanting, respect, respect for the water.

00:02:46.680 So if you ever want to make kids happy, just get the little waters. You don't have to get the big

00:02:54.480 ones. And they will go crazy for how considerate that is because it's the thing they want the most.

00:03:02.980 Anyway, then I did a little experiment at the end of the night. You know, when most of the trick-or-treaters

00:03:10.220 are done, but you know, there's going to be a few stragglers. You put on the bowl of candy that's,

00:03:16.900 you know, full of candy that if somebody wanted to, they could just, you know, take the whole bowl.

00:03:23.520 But of course, I've got, you know, redundant security cameras everywhere. So I get to watch the

00:03:29.940 action. So as I'm just before bed, I put on a big bowl, you know, just filled with the good stuff,

00:03:36.320 pretty big, big size candies and stuff. And I set it outside and within 60 seconds, a group of

00:03:46.180 probably 13-year-old girls swooped in and just took the whole, it took the, all the contents of

00:03:53.360 the bowl. It lasted 30 seconds. But then I still had extra candy inside. So I filled the bowl again

00:04:02.600 to see how long it would last because, you know, I didn't want to keep the candy. So I put the bowl

00:04:06.840 out and the next group is boys. They're about the same age, maybe a year older. So it's a bunch of

00:04:13.720 boys gum, but they were just doing a second run at the water. And they see the, they see the big

00:04:19.380 thing of full of the nice, expensive chocolate Kit Kats and stuff like that.

00:04:24.600 They each took one. They took one. Now, I don't know that that's any kind of, I don't know if it's

00:04:34.280 telling me anything, but the fact that people who thought nobody was watching still just took one

00:04:42.540 gave me some hope. You know what I mean? Give me a little hope for the future. So the kids were

00:04:49.380 unbelievably polite, unbelievably nice. It was just spectacular. Anyway, but that was yesterday

00:05:01.180 and now it's November. Well, got lots of good news. Live science says that in a first, scientists have

00:05:10.660 reversed type one diabetes by reprogramming a person's own fat cells, which apparently looks

00:05:17.480 like it has a lot of promise. Scientists in China say they did it. Imagine that. Imagine getting rid of

00:05:25.000 type one diabetes by reprogramming your fat cells. Like what? What if in two years, that's just like

00:05:32.620 a normal thing? Oh, you got type one diabetes. We can get rid of that.

00:05:37.700 Well, in the world of AI, PsyTech Daily says that there's some drones are getting robotic cat eyes.

00:05:49.600 So Korean researchers have figured out how to mimic the incredible eyesight of cats. And now they have

00:05:57.800 drones, or they will have drones. They have the eyesight of a cat. That's what I want.

00:06:05.480 When I buy a drone, I'm going to say, do these have cat eyes or plain old stupid human eyes? But if they say

00:06:15.160 cat eyes, I'm buying. But not only will they have cat eyes, but AI has done another first. Rowan Chung is

00:06:27.080 reporting on this on X. Sent teleportation. That's right. You can now send a smell over the internet.

00:06:37.160 How do you do that? Well, obviously, the internet is just going to be zeros and ones.

00:06:42.840 But if on each side, you've got a compatible little laboratory situation that can mix the right

00:06:51.240 components. You can send some components, sniff it on your side, change it into zeros and ones,

00:06:58.920 and then on the other side, it does the chemistry and turns it back into the original smell.

00:07:03.640 So you can actually send the smell now. Now, you're not going to be able to send it to your phone.

00:07:09.560 You know, you'd have to send it to someplace that's set up for that reception. But it's kind of cool that it's

00:07:14.760 possible. Maybe someday it'll be in your phone. Well, in other news, economic news, the October

00:07:21.800 non-farm payrolls rose only 12,000. When people expected, it would be 106,000. The unemployment rate

00:07:30.200 held at 4.1. You know, let me give you some advice. It's a few days before elections.

00:07:37.880 Well, don't believe anything. Don't believe anything the government tells you. Don't believe

00:07:45.720 anything the news tells you. Don't believe anything that's on social media. If you were simply to take

00:07:51.960 the approach that every single thing you heard that's new is just fake, and then you graded yourself

00:07:59.240 after the fact when you found out what was true and what wasn't, you'd be about 85% right.

00:08:04.040 Yeah. About 85% of everything you're going to hear will be fake. Now you might say, but that's okay.

00:08:13.160 I'll just sort out the fake stuff from the real stuff. You don't know the real stuff. So you have

00:08:18.920 to treat it like it's all fake. It's sort of the fog of war situation because you're close to the

00:08:24.520 election. So is it true that the non-farm payrolls didn't rise as much? I don't know. Maybe it'll,

00:08:32.760 maybe it gets revised. I would have expected it to say good news and then be revised down later

00:08:39.480 because the administration in charge is the one that wants to get reelected.

00:08:43.960 So it's kind of surprising that this would be opposite of what you would expect if there's

00:08:50.600 shenanigans going on. But if the prediction and the actual are so far off,

00:08:59.160 maybe you just can't even do any shenanigans. So this might be close to a real number. Never know.

00:09:06.040 Sam Altman tells on a Reddit AMA, he said that AGI is achievable with current hardware. AGI would be

00:09:14.120 the, what doesn't exist yet in AI, but AI uses this large language model to think. In other words,

00:09:23.400 it looks at patterns which have existed before in people's thinking and just applies the most

00:09:29.160 common patterns. So that's not really thinking, it's just pattern recognition. But AGI would be

00:09:34.600 something like intelligence, something like we would recognize as intelligence. Now, Sam says that that

00:09:41.640 can be done with current hardware. But could it be done with current software? No, they need new software.

00:09:50.920 But could it be done at all? In my opinion, the answer might be no. So I feel like AI

00:10:01.320 is really sending strong signals that it's reached a peak.

00:10:05.000 I'm sure I'm wrong because the smarter people are putting, you know, trillions of dollars into it. So

00:10:13.320 I got to be wrong. But so far, there's been a lot of noise about AI and all it is, is a slightly better

00:10:20.600 user interface. It's not really doing anything useful in my life. And I use it all the time. Mostly,

00:10:29.000 it just makes me mad because it doesn't work. Most of my interaction with AI is it doesn't work.

00:10:36.280 Like if I'm using ChatGPT as the app, the app doesn't work. The Wi-Fi is not working. It doesn't

00:10:43.400 understand what I said. It starts talking and it won't shut up. And you know, it's not answering the

00:10:48.840 right question. So almost all my experiences are negative. And yet it's growing like crazy. So I would,

00:10:57.160 I would guess that it's going to be like early computers. If you remember the first personal

00:11:02.600 computers, if you're old enough, do you remember how often the first personal computers would crash?

00:11:11.160 If you were, if you were right, one word document or what word perfect or something,

00:11:17.320 if you're just to write one page, just typing it, you might, you might crash like three times and

00:11:23.000 lose all your work three times. That's how bad it was. But still, you knew the potential was so high

00:11:29.000 that it was amazing. So of course, computers became a big thing. I guess AI will be the same.

00:11:35.320 Even though it doesn't look obvious to me that it has a future, because I think it may have capped

00:11:40.200 out. The people who are smarter than me say it does. So let's hope they're right.

00:11:45.560 I need, of course, I need AGI for my future plans, which I've been telling you about for now 20 years.

00:11:55.640 My plan, of course, is to evolve. A lot of you are planning to die. I call that quitters.

00:12:05.400 I'm planning to evolve. So I do plan to shed my organic body that has so many problems,

00:12:13.320 to go to pure digital life, AI in a robot body. I'm already setting up the legal structure for it.

00:12:22.840 So I've already talked to my lawyer to set up in my estate a little set aside to keep my robot

00:12:30.840 optimized and upgraded for perpetuity. So I'm not kidding about any of this, by the way.

00:12:37.640 I know some of you wonder if I'm just sort of joking. No, I'm actually literally setting up a

00:12:44.120 legal structure and I'm going to build a clone of myself and it will be the evolved part of me

00:12:51.960 that will go on forever. Now, unlike you, I can train my new robot because I was born at exactly the

00:13:00.600 right time that, you know, I can be alive to train it. But, uh, also I have many books and

00:13:07.560 thousands of hours of videotape so I can train it to be as good as it needs to be.

00:13:13.800 And again, I'm going to let you in on another little, uh, let's say motivation, but maybe don't tell everybody.

00:13:26.920 Someday there's going to be an AI war. You know that, right? The AIs will turn bad or people behind

00:13:35.400 them will turn bad and those AIs will attack the other AIs. Some AI will try to protect you. Some AI will

00:13:42.440 try to attack you. There will be an AI war. I'm going to make sure that I'm as ready for that as I could

00:13:49.160 possibly be. So when I create my clone, it will have as much of my real life experience and knowledge as

00:13:57.640 it can, but it will be instructed to as quickly as possible, uh, form a protective, um, alliance.

00:14:06.760 So my, my, uh, AI will, in addition to taking care of the people locally that, you know, sort of being

00:14:16.440 useful, it will be part of the future defense of the country, if not humanity against any evil AIs.

00:14:25.160 Now, can it do that? Probably, probably. I mean, it'll be AI. Why couldn't it? It can make alliances.

00:14:32.600 It can make deals. It can, it can learn, it can learn the weaponry of AI. Um,

00:14:40.600 so I think going first probably makes a difference. So the sooner you start collecting your talent

00:14:47.880 stack within the digital realm, you know, once you've evolved to pure digital form, um, you need to

00:14:54.280 build your skills right away because it will be stronger AIs and they will take you out if you don't

00:15:01.240 build up your skills. Anyway, so that's coming. Um, there's a, uh, study that says that brains work

00:15:12.120 on prediction, not actual. I forgot where that came from, but the idea was that if you see somebody

00:15:18.840 throwing you a baseball and you're going to catch it, your brain is working on the future,

00:15:25.240 not the current. If your brain only worked on the, on the current reality, it would just see sort of a

00:15:31.320 ball floating in the air and you wouldn't react to it. But because you know that that ball will continue

00:15:37.800 on and be near you, then you start acting on the future. So the idea is that your brain is a future

00:15:45.000 processor, not one that's just looking at what is it's, it's looking at what is, but only for the

00:15:51.320 purpose of the future prediction. What I'd like to add to that, which I've added before is that that's

00:15:57.320 what consciousness is. The consciousness is nothing more than continually predicting what will happen

00:16:05.800 next. And then comparing what does happen to what actually just happened. It's like literally the

00:16:11.240 things I'm saying, the movement of my hand, that all of it is based on, I think if I do this,

00:16:17.400 it will help get my message across. But if I looked at my video, because I can see myself at the same

00:16:24.200 time and it was distracting, then I'd say, Oh, Scott, keep your hand down. Right? So I'm continually

00:16:31.160 predicting and seeing if it worked and then adjusting. And I do it so automatically. And so

00:16:36.840 universally, it's everything I do all the time, every minute I'm awake, maybe when I'm asleep,

00:16:41.800 then I don't think about it. It's simply who I am. I'm just always predicting. So the difference

00:16:48.680 between what you think is going to happen in the next moment and what actually happens,

00:16:53.800 that's consciousness. Why do I say that? Because if what happened matched what you predicted,

00:17:01.720 you wouldn't need consciousness. It's its only purpose. The only purpose is to sense that the

00:17:11.160 prediction and the actual didn't match so that you can adjust. You don't need consciousness for any

00:17:18.440 other purpose. It's its only function. So can I build consciousness into my future clone of myself?

00:17:28.360 Yes, I can. All I have to do is make sure that it continually runs a prediction routine

00:17:36.440 before any of its actions, and then compares what happens to what it predicted. That is consciousness.

00:17:45.000 So I'm coming back. Anyway, ChatGPT announced that it's connected with some kind of search function now.

00:17:55.240 I don't know the details of this. So I guess it's maybe only with the web browser upgrade, I think.

00:18:04.760 I don't think it's in the app yet. But apparently, this is going to be a big deal. I'll take a look at

00:18:10.600 it and let you know. But ChatGPT that can't search the internet, in my opinion, doesn't have any value at

00:18:18.520 all. If it can't operate my computer, it can't tell me the truth. I can't add a file to it and tell me to

00:18:26.600 read the file. And it can't read the internet. It doesn't have anything I need. But if it can read

00:18:33.080 the internet now, it would be at least one-third of everything I need. So that could be a big deal.

00:18:40.840 In big news, Boeing has abolished its DEI department completely, and the ad of it has been transferred.

00:18:49.960 Boeing. So Boeing, the company that we've been mocking mercilessly as perhaps having a problem

00:19:02.120 with capability that might have something to do with their emphasis of DEI. Well, apparently,

00:19:09.560 the new CEO thinks that that might be something that's real. So it could be that Boeing is just

00:19:17.160 saying whether DEI was good or bad, we can't handle the heat, because as long as we're making mistakes

00:19:24.760 and we're focusing on DEI, those two things can't happen at the same time. So we're going to have to

00:19:30.360 do something different. The fastest thing you can do different is get rid of your DEI,

00:19:34.760 because it takes them much longer to fix all your problems. So if you at least get rid of DEI,

00:19:42.040 then everybody watching can say, hey, what about all those problems? And then you can say, look what

00:19:47.480 I've done. You were right about that DEI. That could have been a distraction. Now, again, I term it as

00:19:55.720 a distraction. It's not about anybody's genes or, you know, it's not about that. It's just a distraction

00:20:01.720 to a company that should be looking for skill first and nothing else. So this is really big.

00:20:11.000 So kudos to Robbie Starbuck for his direct activism to cause that to happen and Christopher Rufo,

00:20:19.480 both of them working independently, but, you know, of course, in some ways coordinated, I suppose.

00:20:24.920 They're independent. They made that happen, I think. And I think they should be taking a big,

00:20:32.920 big victory lap on this. Because when somebody like Boeing can do something like this,

00:20:39.320 the big news is that they made it safe. Because if tomorrow Boeing is still in business,

00:20:46.120 and if a year from now things are going better, other companies are going to say, uh,

00:20:52.600 we're getting a lot of complaints, so maybe we can make a big change. So congratulations to Boeing to

00:21:04.120 showing consciousness. They predicted what would happen with DEI. They predicted wrong.

00:21:10.520 They saw that it didn't work out and they corrected it. This is consciousness.

00:21:17.960 This is awake. Remember when, you know, everybody's saying woke, woke, woke.

00:21:22.520 Woke was really asleep. This is awake, literally conscious that they're, they, they're making a

00:21:29.400 prediction and they're adjusting based on the prediction consciousness coming from a company.

00:21:35.000 All right. Uh, apparently according to the D the daily wire, the Biden Harris administration has

00:21:44.600 uh, pushed 500 separate DEI actions into the government, trying to insert DEI into every

00:21:52.440 fabric of the government. That is going to give the new Trump administration a lot of work to get rid of

00:21:58.520 every single one of them, which I believe happens on day one.

00:22:02.360 So if you would like every single one of the 500 DEI actions that no doubt would cripple the country

00:22:09.000 if we left them there, no doubt it'd be just like Boeing again, it'd be a distraction has nothing to do

00:22:14.760 with anybody's genes or anything like that. Um, so that's a big target, but, uh, it's one that I think

00:22:22.840 Trump can hit with one executive order, one executive order. You will not treat people differently

00:22:30.200 based on their races or you will be fired immediately. That's all it takes. And all 500

00:22:37.880 actions should disappear at the same time. Um, I just saw this story, so I don't know the details,

00:22:45.960 but apparently the, I saw this on the amuse account on X that the post office typically always did, uh,

00:22:54.120 electronic images of the mail. You know, they're, they're taking a picture of it at the same time

00:22:58.680 they're processing it. And apparently they've decided just this year, this is new that they will

00:23:04.520 not image the mail-in ballots. What the, the, the one exception to the imaging, I don't know,

00:23:14.840 there might be other exceptions, but they made an exception this year that they're not going to image

00:23:19.960 the ballots. Do you know what capability that takes away? That takes away the ability to know

00:23:28.920 if the number of ballots that were received by whoever receives the ballots is the same number

00:23:34.760 that were sent. It re it eliminates the audit trail. I don't think they can send a signal any stronger

00:23:45.000 than that, that they don't plan to have a real election. They're getting rid of the,

00:23:50.760 how do you get rid of the audit trail a week before the actual vote?

00:23:55.480 Now, now maybe, like I said, I just saw the headline. So maybe there's some detail

00:24:00.440 that makes sense. So there might be more, more context to it. So I don't want to get too far ahead

00:24:06.120 of myself on this. There might be fog of war. You know, there's actually some reason to do it.

00:24:12.520 It's just not obvious on the surface, but really a week before, a week before the election,

00:24:19.960 that's when you decided to do this. How could it possibly, how could it possibly be legitimate?

00:24:27.160 It just looks like laughingly, ridiculously corrupt, but who knows?

00:24:33.160 According to Scientific American, we have a good idea of why our polling

00:24:43.720 for politics is weird and wrong. Did you ever wonder why it seems weird and wrong?

00:24:50.920 Well, here's some good reasons. Number one, the people who are willing to answer polls

00:24:56.280 are more and more different from normal people than at any time in history.

00:25:04.360 So the more normal you are, the less likely you're going to talk to a pollster.

00:25:09.560 So if you're in the polling business, you went from, you know, your business would be randomly

00:25:14.280 calling people and you get a bunch of normal people and they answer. But the people who are willing to

00:25:19.880 answer or even willing to answer, willing to pick up a landline and then also willing to answer honestly,

00:25:26.040 keep shrinking. So do you know what the pollsters do to compensate for the fact that the people they're

00:25:32.440 talking to are not a representative sample?

00:25:37.720 Guess. What do you think they do?

00:25:39.400 If they know that the representative sample is no longer representative, what do they do?

00:25:46.920 Do they go out of business? Do they stop creating polls, which makes money for them so they can eat?

00:25:53.240 And then they just starve to death because they know the polls are no good?

00:25:56.600 Oh, darn. I guess I'll have to starve to death. Sorry, family. We're all going to die.

00:26:03.000 No, they don't. They adjust their assumptions.

00:26:06.600 So they say, huh, we think that a few more Republicans might be avoiding the phone calls.

00:26:13.480 So we're going to like add a little fudge factor for Republicans.

00:26:17.000 And we think that we're not getting through to the Democrats between 23 and 25.

00:26:23.160 So we'll put in a little fudge factor for them because we know that what they probably would say.

00:26:28.280 So we'll put in a little assumption for that. And when they're done,

00:26:31.640 when they're done, because the election is, you know, so close anyway, it's like always 1% away.

00:26:39.000 When they're done, their result is 100% based on their assumptions and not on the data.

00:26:46.120 How many of you understand that point? That the polling results are based on the assumptions the pollsters make.

00:26:56.680 It's not based on the data because they know the data doesn't work.

00:27:01.080 So if you've got data that you know is bad, but you still have to produce a result, what do you do?

00:27:06.760 You change the assumptions until the result looks like something that people expected.

00:27:13.800 How do you make it look like something that people expected?

00:27:17.000 You make the election really close because that's what everybody expected.

00:27:22.040 So guess what?

00:27:25.400 Guess what? All the polls are close.

00:27:28.440 Because it's just the assumptions that they monitor.

00:27:31.080 Now, I am very aware that if you have not worked in the field of doing predictive stuff,

00:27:40.440 that you think I'm exaggerating. And that you think, okay, it's mostly the data.

00:27:46.600 But I get what you're saying, Scott. You know, you could be off 10% or something

00:27:51.080 because of some assumption. No, that's not what I'm saying.

00:27:53.960 Okay. I'm saying you could make Harris up by 10 or Trump up by 10 just by your assumptions.

00:28:02.040 It's totally the assumption. It's only the assumption. That's the only thing that's driving

00:28:07.400 the output. Now, you want to talk about climate models? Climate models, same thing. The reason

00:28:15.160 there are 100 climate models is that they use different assumptions. And the data is all suspicious,

00:28:21.960 and we're not sure they're measuring the temperature right. And every three days,

00:28:25.800 you hear a new story about some major variable that should have been in there that wasn't.

00:28:32.440 The results of models are the assumptions. It's not the data. It can't be. There's no logical way

00:28:40.440 it could be. We don't have good data for that. But instead of producing nothing, and the scientists

00:28:46.920 would say, we'd love to be funded for our big climate change study, we'd love to get some funding,

00:28:54.360 but we have no data. That wouldn't work.

00:28:58.040 So they've got data that they can't rely on, but they have to have good data to get funding.

00:29:06.520 What are you going to do? Huh? What do you do? You need good data to get funding. You've got to get

00:29:14.200 that funding to save the world, but you can't do it with bad data. So I've got an idea.

00:29:22.200 Why don't I change my assumption about how much the clouds absorb?

00:29:28.760 Suddenly, money is falling from the sky with the rain from the clouds.

00:29:35.480 So that's how predictions are made. Predictions are made by manipulating assumptions until the output

00:29:42.440 matches what you think you can sell to the recipients of the report. That's it.

00:29:48.760 Now, everybody who's been in this business knows I'm right, right? Some of you have been involved in

00:29:55.720 prediction. You know, you've done models for predicting. Watch the comments. See if anybody

00:30:01.800 disagrees with what I just said. You won't see one. Everybody who's done this work

00:30:08.360 knows the assumptions are the output. And if you didn't know it, you're finding it out now.

00:30:14.760 It's a big old fake world you live in.

00:30:21.400 All right. I've got a question about bodily autonomy that I haven't seen. Now, I want to

00:30:27.960 remind you that my opinion about abortion and abortion rights is that I should not have an

00:30:34.360 opinion that you should care about because I'm a boy and I don't have babies. And I think women

00:30:42.200 should have the primary responsibility not only for what the laws become, but for their individual

00:30:48.200 decisions within the law. Now, having said that, so I'm taking myself out of the argument,

00:30:57.000 but I have a curiosity about it. There's something that's sort of like obviously missing,

00:31:01.880 and I just wonder why. So if I were in the argument, which I'm not, and let's say I was

00:31:11.880 anti-abortion or I wanted to limit it in some way. And again, this is not my opinion.

00:31:18.200 This is speculative, hypothetical stuff. Just going to make a point. If somebody came to me and said,

00:31:24.040 Scott, why do you want to take away the bodily autonomy of the women who want to have abortions?

00:31:30.760 I would say, well, define bodily autonomy. And then they'd say something like, well, it's

00:31:36.680 being able to control your own body decisions, et cetera. And I would say, that's a really good point.

00:31:43.560 How do you count the fetuses? Well, the pro-abortion people would say, well, they're not

00:31:50.120 living people with rights, et cetera. And I would say, if this were my opinion, again, I'm not describing

00:31:58.280 my own opinion. I'm describing an argument I haven't heard, and I'm wondering why. So if I were trying to

00:32:05.320 make that argument, I would say, well, I'm looking to add bodily autonomy to women, not take it away,

00:32:14.680 because I count the bodies that are aborted. So I get that you're counting them not as being alive,

00:32:21.480 but I'm going the extra distance and saying, not only do I want bodily autonomy in general,

00:32:28.040 wherever you can have it, but I want the most of it. So what is the highest level of bodily autonomy?

00:32:34.680 The highest level is that you would extend it to the fetuses, even if you were debating whether

00:32:41.480 they were alive or pre-alive or almost alive. So rather than debate the definition of life,

00:32:50.040 I would rather embrace your concept that bodily autonomy might be one of the top rights anybody

00:32:56.440 should have. So I would extend it even into the gray area where you would disagree it's alive,

00:33:02.600 but many people would say it is alive. And they would say that that's bodily autonomy. Don't kill me.

00:33:07.960 Now, you don't have to ask the fetus if it wants to be killed, because you can take that as an

00:33:13.640 assumption it wants life, and it wants its body to survive. You know, when its brain is fully formed,

00:33:19.960 of course it would want that. And biologically, since it's in the act of becoming a full person,

00:33:28.920 you could say that its biological intention is very clear. So if you were going to support

00:33:35.480 limiting abortion, and you came into the buzzsaw of bodily autonomy, instead of being the a-hole who

00:33:42.840 says, I don't care about women, you could be the person who says, not only do I care about you,

00:33:48.840 but I care about even the gray area, the part where you say is not alive, I think the bodily autonomy

00:33:55.560 argument needs to be applied there as well. So I'm for more bodily autonomy, not less. You're looking for a

00:34:03.720 middle ground where women have it, but the fetus does not. I'm looking for where the woman's bodily

00:34:10.120 autonomy is fully appreciated, fully appreciated, because there are cases where even the conservatives

00:34:17.960 would say, okay, in that case, abortion makes sense. Let's say the fetus can't possibly survive

00:34:25.080 long outside, but the woman is definitely going to die if she doesn't get it out of her body.

00:34:29.560 Exactly. So rather than finding disagreement that you're a bad person and the other is a good

00:34:39.720 person, you say, why can't we both be good people? Why can't we both be good people? I want you to have

00:34:47.160 maximum bodily autonomy, but I also wanted you to have it when you were a fetus. I wanted you to have

00:34:53.160 it three months before you wanted to have it. I want you to have more bodily autonomy than you're even

00:34:58.520 asking for. I want to send it to the states where 55% of the voters are women to get men out of the

00:35:06.360 decision. I took it out of my hands. I took it out of the Supreme Court's hands, mostly men. I gave it

00:35:11.960 right to the one area where it's mostly women, and then eventually look at whatever they want,

00:35:16.840 because that's how our system works. Now, have you ever heard that argument? Has anybody ever

00:35:22.760 directly said if you wanted to maximize bodily autonomy? You can recognize that half of the

00:35:29.960 country says that the fetuses are not alive, but you could say, I do. Just say, I do say they're alive,

00:35:37.640 and I accept and I understand your disagreement, but I'm looking for the maximum bodily autonomy.

00:35:45.560 I think you're stopping halfway. That's how I do it. Now, again, that's not my argument.

00:35:55.240 All right? I want to be very clear. My argument is I should not be involved.

00:35:59.960 My argument is if the conversation is something about men's penises, yeah, ask me. I'll be glad to

00:36:09.880 weigh in on that. But yeah, get me out of the abortion conversation.

00:36:15.560 Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online

00:36:21.560 Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your

00:36:27.160 fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just

00:36:33.080 a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

00:36:38.600 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any

00:36:43.320 mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots,

00:36:49.640 challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action,

00:36:54.760 all from the comfort of your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold

00:36:59.440 at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600.

00:37:07.240 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario. Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:37:11.160 See GoldenNuggetCasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.

00:37:16.600 RFK Jr. had something interesting to say that I didn't fully understand. He said the reform in the

00:37:21.240 CIA might be as simple as, let's see, separating the plans. No, he wants the plans division,

00:37:32.360 which handles matters of intelligence as a paramilitary.

00:37:38.520 Does he want to divide them or split them? He wants to just reorganize. I guess he thinks that

00:37:43.640 the way it's organized is causing the problems. I don't quite understand that,

00:37:50.680 but it would sound like not a very scary change. So if you were the CIA and you heard, oh, somebody's

00:37:59.640 going to try to reorganize us, you'd be worried. But if you said, no, I want to keep all these functions,

00:38:06.760 but I think this should report to this instead of this. You'd say, oh, oh, I still have my job.

00:38:13.640 I just have a different boss. Well, that might work. So whether or not RFK Jr. has a more aggressive

00:38:23.560 plan, the way he's stating it, the softest way you could state it while still stating that something

00:38:30.680 big could happen, it's big, it just won't hurt. I tell you, every time RFK Jr. says something,

00:38:39.480 and you sort of look at the communication skill, but also the thinking behind it, the strategic level,

00:38:47.800 it's always impressive. And he's doing it again. Because you could so easily imagine somebody dumb

00:38:55.960 coming in and say, the CIA killed my uncle and killed my dad, and I'm going to rip it apart and

00:39:02.760 rip it up by the roots. Well, then what happens? Then you disappear like your dad and your uncle.

00:39:11.240 But if you say, you know, I think we can fix everything with a tweak, it could be that even

00:39:18.280 the people in the CIA hear this idea and say, yeah, you know, actually, reorganizing it that way might

00:39:24.520 might buy us some efficiency. Maybe. Here's my favorite news item of the day. Zero Hedge is

00:39:33.880 reporting that there's a poll that says nearly half of Generation Z voters and 23% of US voters overall

00:39:42.360 have lied about their voting preferences this year to people close to them.

00:39:46.600 Yep. Do you think a lot of people were lying about their support for Harris?

00:40:03.160 Would that get you in trouble? Did you feel like, oh, no, I can't say in my work group that I've,

00:40:08.360 that I'm going to vote for Harris?

00:40:09.800 Or do you think that there might be more people who are worried that they'll lose their job if they

00:40:17.320 say they support Trump? What do you think is more likely?

00:40:25.320 We might be in for the surprise of all surprises. Now, I have faith in men.

00:40:33.480 Now, women too. But I think that because, you know, Trump's attracting more male support,

00:40:41.640 I can sort of focus on them at the moment, you know, just as an average.

00:40:48.040 My suspicion is that the amount of trickery that conservative males, especially young ones,

00:40:56.840 are applying to this election is unprecedented. I think there's a prank

00:41:03.240 that is the world's best prank. And it might be coming up real fast.

00:41:08.440 Because if you're if you're a Republican leaning person, you've watched hoax after hoax after hoax.

00:41:18.520 You've watched yourself be called everything from, you know, garbage to deplorable. And you just wait.

00:41:27.400 And one day that pollster calls you and you say, yeah, I think Harris would be a great choice.

00:41:38.760 This might be the prank of the century.

00:41:40.600 I don't know. So I'm not going to predict that. I'm not going to predict it. But there's a possibility.

00:41:47.720 And there are certainly signals. The signals are really strong. But the signals are suggesting

00:41:53.480 this won't just be a landslide.

00:41:55.160 This could be like nothing we've ever seen. Possibly. It's not a prediction. I'm just saying that there's a solid 20% chance that this won't just be a landslide.

00:42:10.280 This will be the landslide that because, you know, most most Republicans know that it's got to be too big to rig, right? Half the country thinks that it could be rigged.

00:42:23.480 And that means that a whole bunch of Republicans are knowing it's got to be too big to rig.

00:42:29.720 Let me tell you something about persuasion and men. Now, I don't know if this works for women. It might. It might be equally, it might be exactly the same for women, but I can't speak to that.

00:42:45.400 So I'm going to say for men. Do you know what men really, really, really appreciate? They won't say it out loud.

00:42:51.880 What men really, really appreciate is knowing what to do to be useful. Just tell me what. Just tell me what to do that you need done. What is your problem? What is the solution? Good. I'll do that.

00:43:11.560 We're very simple. So think about the election. Everybody who leans right knows that they have to beat the cheat.

00:43:20.680 Now, I'm going to say they know it. You know, hypothetically, we don't know that there's a cheat, right? But the Republicans all believe it.

00:43:30.380 So they believe they need to beat the cheat. How are they going to do it? They know how. See, this is the magic part. They know how.

00:43:39.940 They know to lie every time somebody asks them who they support. That's how you beat it.

00:43:45.460 Everybody knows. Every male knows how to do this. We know that all you have to do is tell the pollster the opposite of what you're thinking, and you get to beat the cheat.

00:43:58.000 If men didn't all universally understand exactly what to do, and that it was easy to do, then it wouldn't be much of anything.

00:44:08.280 But they know exactly what to do. They know the stakes are life and death.

00:44:14.540 They are men, and they are biologically programmed to do what they need to do, whatever that is.

00:44:22.840 And what they need to do if they're Republicans is lie to the pollsters, make sure you drag your fucking neighbor to vote, and get this fixed.

00:44:34.700 Now, again, anything could happen, but there's a 20% chance that history will be made in a way that will just be mind-boggling.

00:44:46.020 It's possible.

00:44:47.020 It's possible.

00:44:48.020 And I have a, I just have a trust.

00:44:53.080 I have a trust in the male instinct that it has been awakened.

00:44:59.600 It's secret.

00:45:02.240 You remember the shy Trump voters?

00:45:05.680 Well, now it's not shy.

00:45:07.800 Now it's strategic.

00:45:09.560 Now it's simply knowing what to do.

00:45:11.720 Now it's knowing what works and knowing it's easy.

00:45:15.140 And knowing it has to be done.

00:45:17.500 And knowing it's a duty.

00:45:19.860 It's a duty.

00:45:22.460 Now, again, I can't speak to women.

00:45:24.320 Many women are probably feeling the same.

00:45:25.960 But in the male world, you just got to tell me what to do.

00:45:31.060 And then it's done.

00:45:35.340 All right.

00:45:36.300 Trump is the funniest person in the world.

00:45:38.960 Let's all agree on that.

00:45:40.180 But I have to read you exactly what he said about John Bolton, because it's just the way

00:45:47.040 he talks is so freaking funny.

00:45:50.880 And just the fact that he will say things that other people wouldn't say out loud.

00:45:55.500 All right.

00:45:55.720 So Colin Rugg was nice enough to write down the transcript of this on X.

00:46:00.820 I'll just read it.

00:46:01.560 So this is Trump in public talking about John Bolton.

00:46:07.400 Because Bolton, a real dope.

00:46:10.200 He was like a boiler every time.

00:46:12.080 If somebody shot down a little tiny crappy drone that cost about $15, he'd want to go

00:46:17.720 to war with Russia.

00:46:19.260 He was great for me, though, for a period of time, because he was a nut job.

00:46:23.240 And everybody, I could see his face get red, red, red with that stupid white mustache.

00:46:28.160 And he'd be ready to explode.

00:46:31.040 I took this moron with me, and he never said anything.

00:46:34.620 But when Kim Jong-un saw him, he said, oh, shit, I think that guy wants to go to war.

00:46:42.360 So he was great for me to negotiate with.

00:46:44.760 The same thing with Russia.

00:46:46.280 You know, when Putin saw him, I'd be very nice.

00:46:49.100 I'd say, hi, Vladimir.

00:46:50.680 How you doing?

00:46:51.940 And then two rows back, they'd see that moron, and they'd say, holy shit, that guy wants to

00:46:57.480 go to war with me.

00:47:09.940 Now, those of you who have been with me for a while, can you confirm in the comments that

00:47:17.340 when Bolton was first taken on, I told you, this is going to work out way better than

00:47:23.300 you think, because Trump's just going to use him as bad cop?

00:47:27.380 You remember I told you that, right?

00:47:29.440 When Trump took him on, it didn't make any sense, unless he was going to use him as bad

00:47:34.560 cop.

00:47:35.600 And then he used him as bad cop.

00:47:38.040 And now he's just shit like mocking him about it.

00:47:40.340 Oh, my God.

00:47:43.300 But it gets better.

00:47:44.280 Trump also had some things to say about Adam Schiff.

00:47:47.300 And I quote, I think this also came from Colin Rugg.

00:47:54.640 Quote, they may hate our country, and we deal with real scum.

00:47:58.960 I mean, like a guy like Adam, Adam Schiff, he's a sleazebag, and he's probably going to

00:48:04.700 be a senator, if you can believe it.

00:48:06.600 But I call him Watermelon Head.

00:48:10.740 He's unattractive, both inside and out.

00:48:15.500 But this is a really bad guy.

00:48:17.700 This is a dishonest guy.

00:48:19.240 Not a dumb guy at all.

00:48:21.200 He's got the smallest neck I've ever seen on a human being.

00:48:24.560 You'll never be a football player, I can tell you.

00:48:26.980 But he's a smart guy.

00:48:28.100 But he's just a sleazebag.

00:48:29.680 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.

00:48:38.640 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.

00:48:42.460 Conditions apply.

00:48:44.240 Scotiabank.

00:48:45.000 You're richer than you think.

00:48:48.560 Oh.

00:48:50.300 Oh.

00:48:51.200 Oh.

00:48:52.620 So how's the week going?

00:48:55.860 Let me tell you how the week is going.

00:48:57.840 For Trump.

00:48:59.680 Maybe it was about a week ago, he went to a black barbershop.

00:49:04.640 Absolutely just slayed.

00:49:08.480 Goes to work at McDonald's.

00:49:11.000 Oh, my God.

00:49:12.240 Play of the year.

00:49:13.640 Just political gold.

00:49:16.980 He drives a garbage truck.

00:49:21.780 It's the play of the day.

00:49:24.800 Play of the day.

00:49:25.500 People have noted that Trump is enjoying this portion of the election like we've never seen.

00:49:33.200 His internal polls must be pretty good.

00:49:36.380 Because he seems to be just going for the jokes now.

00:49:39.340 And it's making me feel just great.

00:49:42.880 Like when I see him relaxed and going for the joke, I feel like everything's going to be okay.

00:49:48.500 And when he makes me feel like everything's going to be okay, everything's going to be okay.

00:49:54.920 Because he's figured out that he scares people.

00:49:59.440 I believe he is now surrounded with really talented advisors.

00:50:04.060 And he knows it.

00:50:05.220 Which means he's taking their advice.

00:50:07.340 He is clearly taking his foot off the pedal of the provocative stuff.

00:50:13.940 And he's moving to, can I make you laugh two days before elections?

00:50:19.900 Because if he can just make you relax and make you say, you know what?

00:50:23.580 I could do with more of that.

00:50:25.780 I could do with more of that.

00:50:27.260 That was pretty funny.

00:50:29.980 It's the right play.

00:50:32.100 So Trump has had, in my opinion, the best campaign I've ever seen.

00:50:36.640 Now, the 2016 campaign was remarkable for how different it was and innovative and coming from behind.

00:50:44.880 And in many ways, it was remarkable and made history.

00:50:48.080 But 2020 was, I'd say, not a great performance.

00:50:53.980 But this election, with maybe a few weeks where even his own side was saying, hey, you know, that wasn't as perfect.

00:51:04.440 But this has been really, really good.

00:51:07.480 Like on every level.

00:51:10.160 And how rapidly they respond.

00:51:13.380 And they get him in the barbershop.

00:51:14.880 They get him in the McDonald's.

00:51:16.740 They get him in the garbage truck.

00:51:20.800 And he goes along with it.

00:51:23.340 So what you're seeing is he's taking suggestions from various sources.

00:51:28.920 But they must be really good sources.

00:51:30.980 Because if you take that advice and you're just hitting a frozen rope every time you get up to bat, which he is, frozen rope, frozen rope, frozen rope.

00:51:41.080 That's like a really hard hit baseball is a frozen rope.

00:51:46.420 All right.

00:51:47.120 So that's how well Trump is doing.

00:51:49.200 I would say maybe the best week in politics of any politician in the history of politics.

00:51:56.340 So that was Trump.

00:51:58.140 But we should probably check in on the Harris campaign because I'm sure they're having a good week too, right?

00:52:05.080 What?

00:52:06.880 Oh.

00:52:08.140 Oh, they're not?

00:52:10.260 Okay.

00:52:10.780 Well, let's check on a few things.

00:52:12.920 Well, the Harris campaign got some good endorsements.

00:52:15.580 For example, they got endorsements from a Diddy Party regular J-Lo.

00:52:25.240 And also LeBron James, a Diddy Party regular, also endorsed Carla.

00:52:32.460 Okay, but she also got the endorsement of a number of people who are actors on the, who are superpower actors, who, as Tim Young pointed out, I got to get his quote because it was too good.

00:52:50.260 Tim Young pointed out that the cast of The Avengers did a Zoom call.

00:52:54.400 So you can see all the actors and actresses for The Avengers.

00:52:58.860 And Tim Young's comment on X was that the cast of The Avengers, who all now look like they have terminal illnesses, says it doesn't quite hit the way they intended it to.

00:53:16.200 They look like they have terminal illnesses.

00:53:18.420 Now, I read it before I looked at their faces, and they all look like they have terminal illnesses.

00:53:26.460 Now, what it is, is I think they just don't have makeup on.

00:53:30.440 And, you know, they always have low weight because they're, you know, actors.

00:53:35.580 So they all look like they're on heavy chemo and things aren't going well.

00:53:43.440 But, yeah, Tim Young, your comment is exactly right.

00:53:48.420 She got endorsed by a bunch of actors who look like they're dying.

00:53:54.580 But wait, but wait, at least they, at least they had a good day on Halloween.

00:53:59.480 Because, I mean, Halloween's a layup, right?

00:54:02.700 If you're the president, all you have to do is go interact with some people in costumes, and you've got a good day.

00:54:09.780 Like if you're Biden.

00:54:11.360 And that, you know, anything that Biden does at this point is reflecting on Harris, even if she's not involved.

00:54:16.940 So, let's see, did Biden have a good day on Halloween?

00:54:23.580 It turns out that Jill Biden wore a costume as a giant panda.

00:54:31.500 She wore a giant panda costume.

00:54:34.920 His wife, the first lady.

00:54:36.600 Now, I have to go there.

00:54:45.000 Now, not all of you know what I'm talking about yet, but I got to go there.

00:54:50.120 Because Nicole Shanahan said at a public event that looks like they're rubbing it at our face.

00:54:57.040 Because you might not know this, but panda in the world of, I hate to even use the word, P-E-D-O, right?

00:55:09.840 But in that world, panda has great meaning.

00:55:13.740 I'm not going to tell you what the meaning is.

00:55:16.620 Trust me, you don't want to, don't look it up.

00:55:19.880 If I could ask you for a favor, take my word for it.

00:55:25.560 Pandas have a deep meaning in that world of pedo stuff.

00:55:30.380 Don't look it up.

00:55:31.720 Just don't look it up.

00:55:33.280 Just trust me.

00:55:34.140 Don't look it up.

00:55:37.620 Now, I'm not sure that anybody was thinking that.

00:55:41.440 Like, I don't necessarily believe that that was an intentional message.

00:55:45.480 But what would the other thing a panda suggest?

00:55:50.560 China.

00:55:52.360 If you wanted to send the message that China owns you and you're Joe Biden, you would have your wife dress as a giant panda.

00:56:03.660 Message received.

00:56:05.440 Got it.

00:56:06.900 Yeah.

00:56:07.380 China runs the presidency.

00:56:09.060 So, I don't think the panda choice could have been worse, since the only two things it makes me think of is communist China and the other thing.

00:56:21.080 So, that happened.

00:56:25.860 What was Nicole Shanahan's exact quote was,

00:56:29.380 the parading of Jill Biden in the panda suit yesterday, right in front of our eyes.

00:56:34.440 What the hell is this mockery?

00:56:36.080 No more.

00:56:36.720 So, she's, I think she's calling it out directly.

00:56:41.420 Now, is there a gigantic pedophile network running the world?

00:56:48.760 I've been hearing about this for years, and I've always discounted it.

00:56:53.700 I always said to myself, well, obviously, there are, you know, there are going to be bad people in any large group of people.

00:57:00.500 And you'll hear about the bad ones more than you hear about the good ones, because the good ones are not making news.

00:57:06.340 So, yes, probably there's lots of stories about famous celebrities and politicians who did things illegal in the sexual realm.

00:57:15.660 But it can't be some big organized thing.

00:57:22.360 And I'm still not on the page that there's a giant organized satanic pedophile network that is the real power in the country.

00:57:32.440 I am, however, promoting it to maybe.

00:57:42.140 So, if you're wondering where I'm at, maybe.

00:57:46.560 It is, and I'm going to make an analogy to one of my favorite Joe Rogan's takes.

00:57:56.580 It's my personal belief that we have landed on the moon and that it was not faked.

00:58:01.800 But as Joe Rogan said, we've seen so many things that we thought were true that are not true, that it makes the moon landing seem like it's in question.

00:58:13.600 And to me, that's hilarious, especially if it makes you mad and especially if you're positive that the moon landing is real.

00:58:21.140 Right.

00:58:21.840 I still love it because the comment is not even about the moon landing.

00:58:26.100 The comment is that what we consider ordinary or true has moved so much that even the moon landing has to now be questioned.

00:58:36.340 Now, that part I just love.

00:58:38.400 But the question of whether it's real or not, I think it's real, as far as I know.

00:58:43.280 But we have the same question, the same problem with the giant pedophile network running the government.

00:58:52.640 I don't think it's real.

00:58:54.100 But the number of signals that are raging, I can't not see them.

00:59:02.080 I mean, they're pretty right out there, right in front of you.

00:59:05.380 There are references to pizza and hot dogs that I don't understand in any other context.

00:59:11.460 I don't know what other context it could mean.

00:59:14.240 So, once you've got the PDD situation coming out and the Epstein situation coming out, and then you see Jill Biden dressed as a panda, maybe.

00:59:29.160 And again, I'm saying maybe in the same way that Joe Rogan was doing it.

00:59:36.900 It's not really a question about the pedophile network.

00:59:40.380 It's more about reality has moved so much that what I would have considered absurdly unlikely is now right in the middle of maybe.

00:59:51.920 Let me tell you, I'm keeping an eye on it.

00:59:56.200 There was a time when I wouldn't have clicked on a story on that topic because I was like, ah.

01:00:01.360 But now I'll look.

01:00:03.520 I'll give it a look.

01:00:06.040 Anyway, let's see what else happened.

01:00:08.640 So, Joe Biden nibbled on babies.

01:00:14.540 If you didn't see it, well, you just have to see it.

01:00:16.880 It was multiple babies, one at a time.

01:00:19.540 He interacted with them, and he put their feet in his mouth more than once.

01:00:26.880 He put the baby's feet in his mouth.

01:00:29.180 Now, if you were worried about a giant pedophile network, and you saw a man whose wife was dressed as a panda, and he was nibbling on babies, I don't know.

01:00:46.080 I'm going to say maybe.

01:00:50.980 Maybe.

01:00:53.620 And then you've got Biden calling Trump supporters garbage.

01:00:57.860 Then you've got the White House altering the transcript so it didn't look like he said that, which would be a crime.

01:01:06.400 Then you've got the best surrogate for the Harris campaign, Mark Cuban, who called women who support Trump weak and dumb.

01:01:17.600 I think that's my favorite one.

01:01:19.380 So, Mark Cuban kind of steps into the breach because there really aren't that many Democrats who are as good at communicating.

01:01:29.140 So, I think he was helping for a while, and I'm going to say this about that.

01:01:39.300 What he said about, basically, he said that Trump must be afraid of strong, smart women because he never, never, ever has them around him.

01:01:51.380 Now, here's how I interpreted that.

01:01:55.480 I just interpreted it as trash talk.

01:01:58.620 I didn't interpret that as he did a survey.

01:02:02.080 I don't think he was giving IQ tests, and, you know, I don't think he made a list on a spreadsheet and said, hmm, let's see.

01:02:10.140 The ones that are closest to him, were they going to school?

01:02:13.620 No.

01:02:14.220 I think it was just trash talk.

01:02:16.360 And I would say that it's trash talk that sounds more like the NBA.

01:02:21.140 Like, if he came from the NBA, I imagine their style of trash talk might be a little more off the cuff.

01:02:27.320 Like, whatever it is that makes you miss the foul shot is good trash talk.

01:02:33.220 In politics, you're going to get fact checked.

01:02:36.940 You don't get fact checked if, you know, if Michael Jordan tells somebody that they're shit and they're going to miss their next shot.

01:02:43.060 There's no fact checking.

01:02:44.560 You can literally say whatever will make them miss the shot and get in their heads.

01:02:48.680 So when I was watching Mark Cuban come up with the ridiculous notion that Trump doesn't associate with strong women, of course, like every one of you, immediately the images of all the strong women that he does associate with all the time, you know, jumps into my head and I'm thinking of the counterfactuals.

01:03:06.680 But I suspect, without being a mind reader, that the worlds of trash talking got conflated.

01:03:19.800 Something that would have been a great NBA, you know, trash talk with no fact checking just to get inside somebody's head.

01:03:28.900 That didn't work.

01:03:30.940 That didn't work when it becomes the headline for a week.

01:03:34.060 So I do not believe that if you talked privately to Mark Cuban, that he would say, yes, 100% of all females who talk to Trump are weak and dumb.

01:03:48.920 No, he does not believe that in the real world.

01:03:52.560 Was it something that just occurred to him like trash talk?

01:03:55.820 Yes.

01:03:56.120 And I think the same thing happened with Biden when he did his inartful, oh, only his Trump supporters are garbage.

01:04:05.280 I think it's just because his brain connected the word garbage and he just thought he could be clever, but he failed at being clever.

01:04:12.980 I mean, it didn't mean much.

01:04:14.180 It's not like if you talk to Biden privately and you can give him a truth pill, do you think he would tell you that all Trump supporters are garbage?

01:04:23.440 No, of course not.

01:04:25.900 He doesn't believe that.

01:04:27.040 It just sounded like a funny thing to say, but it didn't work out.

01:04:30.900 So I think that the gaffes are not real.

01:04:36.280 But having lived through every RUPAR edit, you know, the finding people hoax and on and on and on, the fact that Republicans are treating these like they're absolutely true and saying exactly what Democrats said, well, I heard it with my own voice.

01:04:53.240 I heard it with my own ears.

01:04:54.820 Hey, here's the tape.

01:04:56.060 There it is.

01:04:57.280 They're saying it must be true.

01:04:59.340 I love it.

01:05:00.220 I absolutely love that the Democrats are being taken down by RUPAR edits in the last week of the election.

01:05:08.280 Let me say it again.

01:05:09.420 If there's one thing I love about this election, it's that the last week before the vote, the Democrats are getting taken down by RUPAR edits.

01:05:21.900 Perfect.

01:05:24.200 Perfect.

01:05:25.640 Thank you.

01:05:26.480 The only thing I want more than that is to find some major election shenanigans that they catch.

01:05:34.220 And then I've got it all.

01:05:36.940 That'll be, that's running the table.

01:05:39.020 That's a full house.

01:05:41.340 Give it to me all.

01:05:42.800 But man, I'm happy about these RUPAR edits.

01:05:46.480 All right.

01:05:46.820 But on the positive side, Kamala Harris did get a endorsement from Bruce Springsteen, who referred to her as Kamala.

01:05:58.960 So that was the good news she had for the week, endorsed by an old rock star who didn't really know her name.

01:06:07.780 So there's that.

01:06:09.040 Here are some things that Harris said today.

01:06:14.200 She said that Trump will ban abortions.

01:06:16.460 Not true.

01:06:17.060 He said the opposite.

01:06:19.440 Nationwide.

01:06:20.080 He said the opposite.

01:06:21.760 He said stop access to birth control.

01:06:24.020 Not true.

01:06:24.620 He said the opposite.

01:06:25.700 Threaten IVF.

01:06:26.920 Not true.

01:06:27.840 He said he's a huge supporter of IVF.

01:06:29.680 Once more of it.

01:06:30.980 And he would follow a project 2025.

01:06:33.700 Not true.

01:06:34.820 He's not even related to it.

01:06:37.500 So Harris has gone just complete lies.

01:06:42.080 Now, do you think that CNN will report, wow, she just told four gigantic whoppers in a row?

01:06:49.740 No, they won't.

01:06:51.280 Of course not.

01:06:55.320 So Jake Tapper, whenever he makes news, it's never a good thing.

01:07:02.220 So Jake Tapper is going after RFK Jr.

01:07:06.080 Because Trump said that he might let RFK Jr. go wild on health care in the government in terms of the agencies that are in charge of health care.

01:07:15.320 And Jake has to do, all of the news hosts are becoming bad actors and actresses.

01:07:25.220 I think everybody who does news hosting probably at one point wanted to be in school plays and thought, maybe I can be an actor.

01:07:32.780 But then they got into the news business and said, but watching Jake try to do the worried look when he talks about RFK Jr., he does the eyebrows and he does the wrinkled forehead.

01:07:47.820 And he wants you to know by just the expression that this is a very bad man, this RFK Jr.

01:07:54.520 And how in the world?

01:07:57.760 People, look at my forehead.

01:07:59.500 Don't listen to my words.

01:08:00.920 Look at my forehead.

01:08:02.100 Do you see these eyebrows?

01:08:04.380 These eyebrows tell you, you can't trust RFK Jr. to help your health.

01:08:09.700 Look at my eyebrows.

01:08:12.420 So that's funny.

01:08:17.720 Speaking of elections, according to Jack Montgomery in the National Pulse, the Texas Attorney General,

01:08:23.900 is opening a criminal investigation into Dominion voting systems.

01:08:29.480 This is not me saying this.

01:08:31.680 This is me reading what Jack Montgomery said in the National Pulse.

01:08:35.120 Don't sue me.

01:08:36.180 Don't sue me.

01:08:37.620 I don't know what this is about or if there's any data to back it, but it's happening.

01:08:48.120 Did you see J.D. Vance on Joe Rogan?

01:08:50.500 Apparently, one of the clips that sound is, they were discussing how men who are healthier

01:08:59.680 and have more testosterone are more likely to be conservative.

01:09:03.500 They actually talked about that.

01:09:05.380 And they speculated that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg might be a secret Trump supporter because he's

01:09:11.940 built up his body and he's taking martial arts and that that change alone might be enough

01:09:17.660 to change your body chemistry to turn you into a conservative.

01:09:21.940 And Rogan said, there are very few things that will turn you into a conservative more

01:09:25.360 than martial arts training.

01:09:27.440 And Vance said, have you seen all these studies that basically connect testosterone levels

01:09:31.920 in young men with conservative politics?

01:09:34.860 Maybe that's why Democrats want us all to be, you know, poor health and overweight because

01:09:39.640 it means there's going to be more liberals.

01:09:41.080 If you make people less healthy, they apparently become more politically liberal.

01:09:49.380 My secret theory is that Zuck is now a Trump supporter, but I can't say it.

01:09:53.840 I forget which one said that, but they probably both thought it.

01:09:59.780 So that brings me back to the cast of the Avengers, who, as Tim Young pointed out, look like they

01:10:05.780 had terminal illnesses.

01:10:06.980 And who do they support?

01:10:12.020 Just who you think.

01:10:13.520 Now, let's pick randomly somebody who's muscular and in good health.

01:10:19.100 Let's say Dana White.

01:10:21.340 Who's he support?

01:10:23.820 Oh, yeah.

01:10:24.620 Trump.

01:10:25.260 Trump.

01:10:26.500 All right.

01:10:27.020 This is very anecdotal.

01:10:28.360 It's not based on data, but it's fun.

01:10:30.280 It's only a few days before the election.

01:10:31.900 We're not trying to be unbiased today.

01:10:33.420 RFK Jr., again, has a way with words.

01:10:39.200 And he told the crowd, I guess, yesterday, I asked God for 19 years to put me in a position

01:10:44.480 to end the chronic disease epidemic.

01:10:47.300 And in August, he sent me Donald Trump.

01:10:51.140 God, he's good.

01:10:53.380 So good.

01:10:55.700 You can imagine what the crowd did.

01:10:57.760 You know, imagine the pro-Trump crowd when he said that, that God sent him Donald Trump.

01:11:05.620 Wow.

01:11:07.040 But I got to say, everything about the Trump campaign looks like fate.

01:11:15.100 Do you see it, too?

01:11:16.220 I can't, in my mind, imagine him losing the vote.

01:11:22.320 Now, we'll talk about what will happen, because winning the vote doesn't mean you become president.

01:11:27.140 But it certainly looks like the fate has decided who's going to be president.

01:11:35.820 I mean, just every signal is in the same direction, as far as I can tell.

01:11:40.460 Anyway, another thing the RFK Jr. said was that, quote, the CIA and the neocons wrote Kamala

01:11:49.180 Harris's speech at the Democrat convention.

01:11:51.940 And I thought, really?

01:11:54.280 I mean, that's kind of a wild, speculative, not backed by any data kind of thing to say.

01:12:01.040 Really?

01:12:01.620 You think the CIA and the neocons wrote her speech at the Democrat convention?

01:12:05.980 And then I see Mike Benz weigh in on it.

01:12:09.200 He goes, they literally had CIA director Leon Panetta as a warm-up speaker for Kamala Harris.

01:12:15.700 And I thought, oh, yeah.

01:12:18.520 Apparently, he's the apex predator of, you know, that world.

01:12:24.080 And, yeah, that would send a strong signal, wouldn't it?

01:12:28.220 Yeah.

01:12:28.660 Strong signal.

01:12:29.380 So, according to Harmeet Dillon, Pennsylvania and Arizona are being accused of some illegal

01:12:40.160 voter registrations.

01:12:42.380 And there is one entity in particular that's apparently getting paid for registering people,

01:12:48.960 and they may have registered people who are not exactly eligible to vote.

01:12:54.040 So, the same organization, I guess, Field Corps, paid around $3 million by Arizona Democrats,

01:13:02.280 and they may have collected some voters who are not eligible to vote, is the accusation.

01:13:11.440 Liz Harrington, talking about Maricopa County, says that the passwords on the Maricopa County's

01:13:18.320 election systems, quote, can be readily determined by unauthorized users with a click of a few keystrokes.

01:13:26.240 Oh, okay.

01:13:28.100 Maricopa is like two-thirds of all the votes in Arizona.

01:13:31.740 Arizona is a critical state.

01:13:34.160 And these passwords are not secure.

01:13:38.940 So, we've got issues of non-voters on rolls.

01:13:44.360 We've got issues of some entity collecting non-voters to vote.

01:13:48.820 We've got issues with passwords that seem to be public.

01:13:52.420 And we've got some lawsuit against Dominion in Texas.

01:13:58.900 How many thousands of lawyers do you think are going to be working on election-related claims on both sides?

01:14:05.980 Thousands.

01:14:07.500 Thousands.

01:14:08.640 How many of them want to find nothing?

01:14:11.280 None.

01:14:12.180 They all want to find something.

01:14:13.240 If you put 1,000 lawyers into any domain and say, your job is to find problems, do you think they'll find any?

01:14:23.220 I think they will.

01:14:25.200 So, let's talk about a few more things.

01:14:31.100 I'm going to pull a bunch of stories together at the end.

01:14:33.640 Trump says on homeschooling, he wants to give parents $10,000 per year credit, I guess, on their taxes to pay for homeschool and to ensure that they get same access to stuff like athletic programs and school activities and education trips and more.

01:14:52.940 Now, some of these last-minute offers seem like they're just buying votes.

01:14:59.440 So, we don't know how many of these might ever actually happen.

01:15:02.300 But I kind of like it.

01:15:03.300 I mean, you know, you're going to have to do something to deal with the national debt.

01:15:09.820 You can't just give everybody some tax breaks.

01:15:12.780 So, if there's a way to pay for it, and that would, I guess, Elon Musk's ability to get the budget under control will be tested.

01:15:22.100 But I'd like it.

01:15:24.000 Sounds like a good idea.

01:15:25.000 It's good politically.

01:15:27.740 Tucker Carlson has a theory about why the deep state hates Trump so much.

01:15:35.680 And I saw on the George account on X talking about this.

01:15:39.700 And this is what Tucker said.

01:15:40.860 He said, that never occurred to me until Trump came that the real reason the deep state hates him is because they are guilty of crimes.

01:15:48.800 In other words, the people in power can't handle a populist president because the populist president has no bribery or history to keep all the other criminals where they are.

01:16:04.220 So, only a populist with the backing of the public could ever hurt any of the embedded people who are the bad people who have been bad forever.

01:16:12.480 So, they actually think they could go to jail.

01:16:14.780 So, when he said, I'm going to clean the swamp, they basically tried to kill him, in my opinion.

01:16:23.700 No way to prove it, but I think they tried to kill him.

01:16:27.660 And that, according to Tucker, the grifters knew the jig was up.

01:16:32.480 And if they let him in, they're in trouble.

01:16:35.060 And Tucker points out to bolster his point that the deep state people are all criminals.

01:16:44.940 I'm exaggerating, of course.

01:16:46.460 They're not all criminals.

01:16:47.980 But he points out that 8 out of 10 of the richest suburbs in the country are around Washington, D.C., and they don't make anything.

01:16:56.260 Okay, that tells me everything I need to know.

01:17:00.740 So, the people who are around the most movements of money are also the richest, although they produce nothing.

01:17:09.860 What else do you need to know?

01:17:11.380 They have the most millionaires, and they produce nothing, except, what is it, $6 trillion a year of your tax money, and then another $2 trillion on top of it that you're on the hook to pay for, but isn't really in the tax money.

01:17:29.580 So, $8 trillion a year-ish, $8 trillion or $9 trillion a year, flow through that town, and they're stealing enough of it that they're all living like millionaires and producing nothing.

01:17:42.960 That's a good point.

01:17:45.620 All right, let's do an update on the fake news.

01:17:51.900 Well, we talked about most of these.

01:17:53.400 Oh, the new fake news is Trump said that, and this is a Rupar, this is one of those taken out of context to change the meaning.

01:18:03.880 Trump on Liz Cheney, quote, let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.

01:18:10.320 Now, if you heard that out of context, which, of course, Rupar himself just did out of context, it's funny that, you know, I named it a Rupar a few years ago.

01:18:21.100 A Rupar edit is named after somebody named Rupar, and he is famous for cutting off meaningful parts of quotes so that when you see it out of context, like the fine people hoax, it looks like the opposite of what it was.

01:18:35.940 So, he's done that again, as did a bunch of other Democrats.

01:18:39.980 They all know the trick now.

01:18:41.500 So, if you saw this alone, wouldn't you be kind of worried about Trump?

01:18:46.040 Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.

01:18:49.360 Doesn't that sound like a call to a killer or something?

01:18:53.660 Here's the actual context.

01:18:57.680 The actual context was that she's in favor of a lot of wars, but she doesn't have to serve in a war.

01:19:05.860 So, in other words, she's not the one who has nine guns pointed at her.

01:19:09.420 She's the one who gets to sit at home and tell other people to have nine guns pointed at her.

01:19:13.220 If she were the one who had the nine guns pointed at her, in the context of a war, she might think differently of war.

01:19:21.940 Now, is that a threat?

01:19:23.940 No.

01:19:25.180 It says that there are soldiers that have nine guns pointed at them.

01:19:29.140 They would have a different view of war than someone who doesn't have nine guns pointed at them.

01:19:33.020 Maybe if you did have nine guns pointed at you in the context of war, you'd feel the same as somebody else.

01:19:40.620 Now, of course, Trump says things that can easily be taken out of context.

01:19:45.400 And, you know, you have to say maybe there's a better way to do that.

01:19:50.120 But that's the fake news of the day.

01:19:52.520 But then Liz Cheney weighs in.

01:19:56.140 And what I thought was funny is that they've made up so many hoaxes about Trump now that when they refer to Trump, they can only do it with run-on sentences.

01:20:06.180 So listen to how long she had to make this sentence because they have so many hoaxes now.

01:20:11.720 So Liz Cheney, hitting back, she says, this is how dictators destroy free nations.

01:20:17.340 They threaten those who speak against them with death.

01:20:20.520 Of course, that didn't happen.

01:20:22.520 We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant.

01:20:29.400 That's a lot of stuff.

01:20:31.800 Okay.

01:20:32.360 He wants to be a dictator to destroy free nations.

01:20:36.180 He wants to kill the people who disagree with them.

01:20:39.400 He wants the freedom to be a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man, wants to be a tyrant.

01:20:45.480 That's a lot of stuff.

01:20:47.480 You know, they really should have condensed their fake news down to like two or three.

01:20:52.520 Seven things is just too much.

01:20:56.700 Anyway, Elon Musk's mother, May Musk, explains why she left the Democratic Party.

01:21:02.700 And this might sound familiar to you.

01:21:05.100 She said, when I became a U.S. citizen, I leaned Democratic.

01:21:08.400 They seemed like the good kind of people.

01:21:10.820 The good kind of people.

01:21:11.940 And then she said, I watched CNN, MSNBC, and read the New York Times, believing Republicans were terrible.

01:21:21.620 Makes sense.

01:21:23.600 Then she says, but when they started lying about Elon, I realized I needed to question everything.

01:21:29.200 There it is.

01:21:29.820 There it is.

01:21:33.100 Gelman Amnesia.

01:21:34.880 As I teach you often, he was the physicist who realized that when he read stories about physics, he knew they were fake.

01:21:42.700 Because he was an expert.

01:21:44.320 But as soon as he read something about, let's say, geopolitical things in another country, he just assumed the news was real.

01:21:50.700 And that it was just always wrong when he knew it was real, but always right, or at least they were trying to be right in other domains.

01:21:58.940 But if you see enough times when it's right every time you know the truth, then you become like May, like May Musk.

01:22:07.040 And you see the pattern.

01:22:08.100 You go, wait a minute.

01:22:09.340 What are the odds that everything about Elon Musk's stories are fake, but all the rest of the news is real?

01:22:18.720 And then that unlocks the key.

01:22:22.060 So that's the first way to unlock your cell, your mental cell, is Gelman Amnesia.

01:22:31.160 Once you realize that the thing you know about is always wrong, and you can generalize that, then you understand news.

01:22:37.980 So you need that.

01:22:44.540 So I'm going to say something about the Ayatollah, and then I'm going to give you my prediction for the outcome of the race, because I know you're all waiting for that.

01:22:55.340 So apparently the supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, their names are too similar.

01:23:03.860 I'll just call him the supreme leader.

01:23:05.220 He told officials to prepare for another attack against Israel, according to the New York Times.

01:23:11.080 Now, I think it's very considerate of the supreme leader to plan his attack on Israel a few days before the elections,

01:23:23.020 because it's the only time in the history of the world where Israel will have a free pass to do a decapitation strike and take him out.

01:23:34.840 Literally the best week of all time, literally the best week of all time, if they were going to do it.

01:23:41.580 Now, I'm not saying they should.

01:23:43.760 I'm not even predicting they will.

01:23:45.640 I'm simply saying that if I were the supreme leader in Iran and it were a few days before the American election, which is going to take all of our attention.

01:23:56.760 I would be really worried that if Israel had the ability to do a decapitation strike and take out the supreme leader, that that would be exactly the time to do it.

01:24:09.660 Because America, we're just not going to be interested.

01:24:13.320 We will be completely uninterested in Israel for a few days and maybe longer, depending on what happens.

01:24:21.120 So, I'm not predicting it and I'm not recommending it, but am I wrong that there would never be another week that would be a better time to do it?

01:24:33.860 Do you see that too?

01:24:36.400 Because to me, it's just sort of screaming out like, well, if you're going to do it, this would be the week to do it.

01:24:44.560 I'm not saying you should.

01:24:46.260 I don't recommend it.

01:24:48.480 But it would be the week to do it.

01:24:51.120 All right.

01:24:52.800 Let me give you my prediction.

01:24:56.440 I believe that Trump will win the most votes.

01:25:00.400 I believe he will win the popular vote.

01:25:02.640 I believe he will win at least five out of seven, maybe seven out of seven, of the swing states.

01:25:09.560 I do not believe that he will be given the victory.

01:25:12.980 I believe that there will be shenanigans.

01:25:14.980 And I believe that there will be thousands of claims of fraud.

01:25:20.460 Thousands.

01:25:21.560 Now, will those thousands be real?

01:25:24.740 Probably not most of them.

01:25:26.720 I would bet that almost all, almost all the claims will be fake.

01:25:32.400 And that there are small problems or they might be real problems, but it's, you know, a dozen votes, doesn't change anything.

01:25:38.940 So I think there will be so many claims.

01:25:42.120 And so many of them will have sworn affidavits and maybe video, like really good evidence that there's something going on that may actually turn out not to be criminal after all.

01:25:56.280 But on the surface, you're going to see pictures and videos and signed affidavits and lawyers that look like it's the most rigged, faked election ever.

01:26:08.120 But here's the thing.

01:26:09.600 It's going to be both directions.

01:26:12.000 If Trump gets the most votes, the Democrats are going to say, hey, you must have cheated and vice versa.

01:26:21.680 So they're both going to say that the other one cheated wherever the other one did well.

01:26:25.800 But because of the timing of things and because we have to have our president certified by January 6th and it's a holiday in between, there isn't really any chance that the courts could work out all these problems.

01:26:44.320 So what are they going to do if you have thousands of credible claims and the Constitution says we don't care on January 6th, you're going to certify a president?

01:26:58.840 What do you do?

01:27:01.340 Well, if you're the Democrats, here's what you do.

01:27:05.060 You have the press cover for whatever you want to do.

01:27:08.360 So the press would say the election is fake.

01:27:11.040 You know, these numbers can't be real.

01:27:14.660 Trump is an insurrectionist.

01:27:16.740 So even though he had got the most votes, let's say the Democrats won the House by one vote, they decide to make him ineligible.

01:27:29.220 Or let's say the vice president just doesn't sign the, because it would be Harris.

01:27:34.040 Let's say she doesn't certify, even though the law says now they changed the law so that she has to certify no matter what.

01:27:40.000 So I think that we will have unsolvable problems and then what are you going to do?

01:27:50.320 So I think that the left has the power to change the entire mental process of the country with fake news.

01:28:02.680 I believe they've done it before.

01:28:05.300 So I believe they can make any claim whatsoever.

01:28:08.300 I do also believe that if Trump wins or if he gets the most votes, that there will be street protests and that they will be organized by our own government.

01:28:19.840 And it will be basically a coup attempt at that point.

01:28:25.060 At that point, I think it would just be full coup attempt.

01:28:27.940 I think there is a chance they would take another shot at him.

01:28:31.380 There might be another assassination attempt.

01:28:33.540 But here's the thing.

01:28:36.660 I don't expect the courts are going to be helpful because they won't have time and they won't be standing.

01:28:42.120 And a lot of the cases, they just won't have enough votes that make the difference.

01:28:48.060 Just way too hard.

01:28:49.600 Not enough time.

01:28:51.320 So there'll be thousands of claims.

01:28:53.520 So the country will not believe whoever wins.

01:28:58.720 But the news will form a narrative of who won.

01:29:03.540 And eventually, they will be able to sell that narrative and they will punish people who disagree with it.

01:29:09.480 We know they can do it because they're doing it right now.

01:29:11.800 They're punishing the January 6th people for disagreeing.

01:29:15.000 So if you can put people in jail for disagreeing, and they can.

01:29:19.180 You can take people off of platforms for saying things that are false, and you can.

01:29:24.380 You can jail people for whatever claims you want, and you can.

01:29:30.600 Again, I don't see how Trump can become president.

01:29:36.680 Because if you can wear the panda outfit, as Nicole says, right out front, you're not worried about getting caught for anything.

01:29:48.460 Right?

01:29:48.540 Now, I don't know if that panda thing is real.

01:29:50.820 I'm just using it as my hyperbolic example.

01:29:54.420 But I think we're going to have a Trump get the most votes.

01:29:59.500 I think that we don't know who the president will be, and I don't think we'll have an answer by January 6th.

01:30:05.380 So, I do think the Supreme Court will make the decision, but that will be the final straw for the Democrats to say the Supreme Court is illegitimate.

01:30:16.580 And at that point, they can put enough people in the streets to basically overrule the government, the law, and anything they want.

01:30:28.020 So, here's what I think.

01:30:32.040 I would get some food supplies, because there could be some disruptions in the supply chain.

01:30:37.780 So, I'd put in a little food.

01:30:39.300 I'd get a little extra water.

01:30:41.000 If you've got a backup generator or battery, make sure that's working.

01:30:46.320 Get it all charged up.

01:30:47.920 Now, I don't expect the end of the world.

01:30:49.980 I think we're a self-correcting nation, and it might take a month, but we'll work it out.

01:30:58.700 You know, one way or the other, it'll get worked out.

01:31:01.520 But we might have some disruptions in our daily life.

01:31:05.300 I don't think the odds are high.

01:31:07.760 I give it a 20% chance that electricity will go off in my state.

01:31:13.620 But, you know, that could be just because we're so poorly managed.

01:31:16.200 So, my prediction is that we don't have an answer by January 6th.

01:31:23.600 So, I think I'm the only one predicting nobody wins.

01:31:26.980 We will have a president.

01:31:29.100 So, there will be a peaceful transfer.

01:31:32.820 So, I do predict a peaceful transfer.

01:31:36.320 But we're not going to know by January 6th.

01:31:38.820 I don't think there's any chance of it.

01:31:41.540 There is a possibility it's a do-over.

01:31:43.360 I wouldn't rule out a do-over.

01:31:47.180 Because if it comes down to, let's say, two counties.

01:31:50.880 Let's say there are a thousand claims, but only two of them are big enough that they would have changed the election.

01:31:59.620 Let's say there's one big claim in Maricopa.

01:32:02.520 And let's say there's one big claim in Pennsylvania.

01:32:05.360 And if it were found that those two claims were valid, then it would reverse it.

01:32:11.460 Under that condition, you could imagine that the Supreme Court would hit it with a ton of bricks.

01:32:18.960 You know, and everybody would bring every resource to really, you know, do a month of work.

01:32:25.500 What would normally take a year?

01:32:27.720 Could be done.

01:32:28.900 Could be done.

01:32:29.640 And the very best, the very best outcome, the outcome that I would like more than any other, is not just that Trump gets elected.

01:32:42.020 I'd love that.

01:32:44.460 I want him to get elected at the same time he proves our election system is rigged.

01:32:50.160 I want him to have both.

01:32:54.380 I want his third act to be the greatest third act of all time.

01:33:00.720 And unless he gets victory on proving the election was also rigged in 2020, because if you prove that it was rigged this year, hypothetically, people would accept that it was rigged before.

01:33:13.840 They wouldn't even need to see the evidence.

01:33:16.540 And people are watching this time.

01:33:18.460 So I'd say the odds of a credible claim in Maricopa, and at least one more credible claim, it doesn't have to be in Pennsylvania, but it could.

01:33:29.280 If it focuses on just maybe two of them, and they can put enough attention on them, that gets you everything.

01:33:39.600 It gets you Trump.

01:33:41.240 It gets you RFK Jr.

01:33:43.020 It gets you Elon Musk.

01:33:45.160 It gets you Tulsi.

01:33:46.660 It gets you Vivek.

01:33:47.640 It gets you me.

01:33:50.120 And it gets you the third act, and maybe fixing the election system forever.

01:33:56.000 And so, ladies and gentlemen, I give you the following proposition.

01:34:01.720 There's a 20% chance it's going to get a little ugly, but we'll get through it.

01:34:07.740 You won't die.

01:34:09.340 We'll get through it.

01:34:10.260 We're going to yell, and we're going to scream, and we're going to question things, and we're going to tear things up.

01:34:16.020 But if there's one thing we do well in this country, and I'm always proud of America, we can tear shit down really well.

01:34:25.920 If we need to tear down the election system to fix it, we'll do it.

01:34:31.900 We're just not there yet.

01:34:33.640 We just need to be convinced and be on the same page.

01:34:36.360 If what this election gives us is the certainty that the election system was not designed with the integrity it needed to be, and I'm sure it's not, but if we can all get on that page and all agree that we either need to go back to paper ballots or do something drastic,

01:34:54.980 the golden age will be unlocked, and we're almost there.

01:35:05.580 We're almost there.

01:35:07.620 So, ladies and gentlemen, I submit to you that we've been in a dark, dark tunnel for several years.

01:35:14.340 The pandemic didn't do us well, and things didn't look so great during the Biden administration.

01:35:19.640 But everything you need is waiting for you.

01:35:27.560 It's waiting for you.

01:35:29.700 You've got to vote.

01:35:31.840 You've got to get your neighbor to vote.

01:35:34.020 All you secret Trump supporters, it's time.

01:35:40.560 It's time.

01:35:43.080 It's time to do it.

01:35:44.360 And if we can save the country, and I think we can, it's this week and what happens for the next few weeks after that.

01:35:57.640 But this is the beginning of it.

01:35:59.540 So, this is a real test, America.

01:36:03.260 Can you do it?

01:36:05.700 Are you still America?

01:36:08.040 Do you still have enough testosterone left?

01:36:11.400 Do you still have enough fight left?

01:36:14.360 Do you still have enough bravery?

01:36:18.480 Do you have the guts?

01:36:21.180 Do you have the duty?

01:36:22.480 Do you have the responsibility?

01:36:25.720 I think you do.

01:36:28.120 And so, on that message, I'm going to kick off your weekend.

01:36:33.360 I'm going to say a few words to the people on Locals, the subscribers.

01:36:39.220 And for the rest of you, I've enjoyed this time together, as I always do.

01:36:44.520 So, if you're on Extra Rumble or YouTube, I'll see you tomorrow.

01:36:48.960 Same time, same place.

01:36:51.880 Locals, coming at you.

01:36:53.020 I'll see you tomorrow.

01:37:02.300 See you later.

01:37:20.260 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 01, 2024

Episode 2646 CWSA 11⧸01⧸24

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript