Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 14, 2024


Episode 2659 CWSA 11⧸14⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 31 minutes

Words per Minute

149.25417

Word Count

13,648

Sentence Count

5

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of human civilization, we talk about the dopamine hit of the day that makes everything better, climate change and a breakthrough drug that could delay Alzheimer s for a decade.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 a little bit mixed today but we have high hopes high hopes let me call up some
00:00:07.640 some comments and we'll have a show for you let me tell you it'll be amazing
00:00:16.400 trust me it'll be amazing probably the best thing you've ever seen
00:00:30.000 good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called
00:00:39.300 coffee with scott adams and you've never had had a better time in your whole life
00:00:44.220 but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody could even understand with
00:00:50.960 their tiny shiny human brains all you need is a copper mugger glass of tanker shells with stein
00:00:55.960 a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee
00:01:01.360 and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes
00:01:06.080 everything better it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now thank you paul
00:01:17.800 well let's talk about all the things let's say uh it's been 24 hours since i talked to you last
00:01:29.180 23 actually so did anything happen
00:01:34.820 was there any news made in the last 24 hours anything at all no
00:01:44.940 wait is my cap inside out no my cap is not inside out you bastards this is the official
00:01:54.480 coffee with scott adams hat there you go there you go you see it's me and then that's also me
00:02:05.220 this i know this is going to be confusing for you this is me and this is me
00:02:10.620 try to keep those straight all right did you know that uh caffeine's uh impact on your brain
00:02:19.180 could reduce your cravings for alcohol that's right is there anything that coffee can't do
00:02:26.820 let me check my notes uh anything anything coffee can't do can't do um it can't help
00:02:34.560 Kamala Harris win the presidency but besides that there's nothing it can't do
00:02:39.500 so coffee according to the site side post might make it easier to get off of alcohol if you wanted to
00:02:47.560 did you know that climate models as incredible and valuable and accurate as they are
00:02:56.560 all hundred of them that are different they're going to make them even better
00:03:01.300 wow talk about the golden age huh you got your climate models that are totally believable
00:03:10.120 and now they're going to add wait for it ai that's right that's right the existing climate models
00:03:18.840 oh almost perfect almost just right but what they need is one extra layer of total bullshit called ai
00:03:31.160 because if you can't trust your ai model for predicting the temperature of the earth in 80 years
00:03:38.140 what can you trust
00:03:39.500 well for those of you who've never been around the predictive models let me tell you something
00:03:47.000 it's not the data and it's not the model that determines the answer
00:03:53.360 do you know what determines the answer it's not the data and it's not the model what is it
00:04:01.520 it's the assumptions
00:04:03.620 because the assumptions are not data they're assumptions about well i think we got all the
00:04:09.960 variables and then you compare it to all the other models and go well they're making different
00:04:15.420 assumptions about the clouds but we like our assumptions it's the assumptions that give you
00:04:23.380 the output and if they didn't like the output they wouldn't tell you what ai did to it it's pretty much
00:04:29.820 just the assumptions well meanwhile scientists have developed a breakthrough nasal spray
00:04:37.220 that could delay alzheimer's for over a decade according to sci tech daily but they have only put it into animals so far
00:04:45.580 now i don't know how many animals actually get alzheimer's or how many animals even live 10 years so you can check
00:04:55.280 but the way you do it is you give it to the animal let's say a cow and then you wait 10 years
00:05:01.800 and you say to the cow hey do you recognize me and if the cow just stares you like doesn't even know you
00:05:09.940 that's alzheimer's but
00:05:12.980 okay i'm just kidding they don't give it to cows probably
00:05:17.560 might be maybe a rat or something all right but here's my scientific knowledge question for you
00:05:23.680 i asked a version of this on x this will sound like i'm leading to something
00:05:28.700 but it's really for your general knowledge
00:05:32.160 number one if something is tested in the lab and it works in the lab and then it also works in
00:05:41.360 in animals what are the odds it will work in a person go in the comments tell me the odds there's
00:05:50.100 something that works in the lab and it kills things in a test tube and it works in an animal
00:05:55.580 and it's safe enough and effective enough in the animal what are the odds that that will translate to
00:06:02.480 human usefulness your numbers are way too big 25 but you're being funny the real answer is five to
00:06:10.680 ten percent five to ten percent now let's make it more interesting there are two reasons that a drug
00:06:18.560 would not be approved for human use one is if it's too dangerous two if it's not let's say bioavailable
00:06:29.360 meaning that if it could get to the right part of your body you know cross whatever membranes and
00:06:35.620 get into whatever parts then it might be effective but if it doesn't in a human but maybe it does in a
00:06:42.200 rat then that would be another reason it doesn't work now there could be lots of other reasons it
00:06:47.940 doesn't work but those are two big ones so now i'm going to revise my question let's say you're
00:06:53.340 dealing with an already improved drug that's being used for a different purpose so it's approved and
00:07:00.020 it's safe and the safety profile is excellent so you know for sure that it works in the lab
00:07:07.060 you already tested it that it works in animals and you know for sure because it's an improved drug
00:07:14.820 that's been around forever that it won't hurt you now what are your odds that it would be approved
00:07:19.800 for a human works in the lab works in an animal definitely doesn't hurt anybody what's your odds now
00:07:27.100 the answer is nobody knows which is weird because it seems to me that would be a really important
00:07:35.940 thing to know if you were in that line of work what percentage of drugs do you think work even in
00:07:42.660 a human but but at the end they go oh damn it works it totally works but you know 10 of the people
00:07:50.480 who took it died so you know can't be approved i don't know but you you have to assume that
00:07:57.500 some amount of the drugs are only rejected because they hurt humans but they didn't hurt the rat
00:08:03.140 all right now suppose you knew also that since it was an approved drug it had a good ability to
00:08:13.840 sort of become bioavailable in other words uh it's already something used in humans so it must be able
00:08:20.840 to get to the good parts of a human but depending on what your new use for it is it might need to get
00:08:26.800 into the brain versus the heart versus the bone so maybe there's a difference there so let's say you
00:08:32.300 knew it was bioavailable in general for some other purpose worked in the lab worked in an animal
00:08:39.840 definitely is not dangerous and is bioavailable meaning it gets to the right parts of the body
00:08:46.700 for some other use now what what are the odds that that would work if you want to know what the
00:08:56.380 the reason i'm asking for is that ivermectin works against cancer in a lab and apparently it's worked
00:09:05.700 against cancer in some animals and ivermectin is known to be safe for human use i mean nothing is
00:09:14.480 100 but in terms of meds it's one of the safer ones and we know it's bioavailable because it works
00:09:21.920 against not only what it was meant for some kind of parasites or whatever but it also seemed to have
00:09:32.300 some related benefits for covid which would be a whole different thing so it can get to a worm or
00:09:38.780 a bug in your body whatever it is and it can also get to whatever is affecting a virus
00:09:46.480 so now what are the odds knowing all of those things that the lab tests of ivermectin
00:09:55.440 would translate into human success does anybody have a guess well i don't but it would be really
00:10:04.880 interesting if that's the sort of thing that science can sort out because wouldn't you like to
00:10:09.760 know what the odds of a specific drug is versus what are the odds of drugs in general so if you say
00:10:17.060 to me we developed this thing and it works in the lab and it works in an animal and and then you
00:10:22.460 calculate the odds from that alone i feel like that's not treating it as individual enough i feel
00:10:30.180 like each specific drug probably scientists could come up with an estimate for that kind of drug
00:10:37.220 you know more like well this one's 80 percent but this one's more like 10 percent so anyway we should
00:10:44.040 know that all right so let's get into the politics um so according to ars technica the advertisers who
00:10:56.400 may have been hesitant to advertise on x before because of politics or because of their own preferences
00:11:02.680 or whatever may be looking to moderate that and maybe get back to advertising on x do you know why
00:11:11.520 because the advertisers are concerned that if they don't advertise on x elon musk might have a bad
00:11:19.420 opinion of them for not advertising on his platform and he might have the ear of the president and the
00:11:25.580 president controls the government which has a lot of control over companies so if you were a company
00:11:31.540 that ever wanted the u.s government to do something in the future that would help you
00:11:36.220 might be good to know that you had advertised on the only free speech platform now how much do i like
00:11:47.240 that not at all you you shouldn't be happy about that because what is being described is essentially
00:11:54.860 bribery am i right i mean it wouldn't be illegal but if the reason that somebody is going to advertise
00:12:02.040 on x is so that they can preserve their options with the government um that's not good that's not
00:12:10.320 the country you want to live in you don't want people choosing their advertising space based on
00:12:15.820 revenge from the government so no not cool now i'm not also not sure that it's real right ars technica
00:12:23.360 says that people are thinking this way and it would be consistent with everything we know about how money works
00:12:31.140 we do know big companies will move large amounts of money to whatever is influential you know whether
00:12:37.940 it's lobbyists or anything else so i don't think they're wrong in terms of a prediction
00:12:44.600 but i don't love to see it as much as i love uh everything about x and i love seeing elon musk involved
00:12:54.420 in the government exactly the way he is i don't love that this is the way x would become profitable
00:13:01.600 although i want it to be profitable so anyway it's not exactly the right incentive structure
00:13:10.000 meanwhile in news that it took me 30 minutes to believe the first 30 minutes i thought it was a joke
00:13:18.100 that alex jones's info wars all the assets for that company that went up for auction because of the
00:13:24.740 sandy hook issues was purchased by the company that owns the onion
00:13:29.820 so obviously i didn't believe it i'm like okay that didn't happen the no no the satirical
00:13:39.700 company that's why it's a joke because you know it'd be funny if the onion bought it so so obviously it's not
00:13:46.860 the onion and then i would see another post on x and i think huh wow this is a good prank it really
00:13:53.520 fooled a lot of people and then i'd see more and then i'd see it attributed to the ap and i thought
00:14:00.020 wait a minute there are a lot of details on this story and then i found out like the name of the
00:14:06.540 parent company i'm thinking huh did this actually happen in the actual real world the onion bought
00:14:14.720 info wars now i heard somebody say that they thought that the sandy hook victims
00:14:20.420 you know were were behind it to get it to be an anti-gun platform or something but
00:14:27.040 am i wrong that the onion stopped being funny several years ago
00:14:32.260 am i wrong about that do you remember when the onion was the funniest thing on the internet
00:14:38.120 i mean by far it was just the funniest thing on the internet and then something happened
00:14:42.520 and i don't know i think maybe i thought i changed or maybe i just wasn't seeing their posts as much
00:14:50.340 but they kind of disappeared or at least they didn't produce any viral content because i just
00:14:57.160 stopped seeing them so i didn't know what happened to the onion i thought you know they closed or
00:15:01.180 something but apparently they changed management and i don't know what their management is up to but
00:15:06.980 they've now bought two properties that uh you'd have to wonder why they would do it to the onion
00:15:12.400 as it was dying and info wars just the assets but if he's buying a studio situation and an ip
00:15:21.780 and a bunch of customers i don't know maybe but but if you were left leaning what good would it be
00:15:30.660 to have a bunch of customer lists of people who watched info wars i don't know there's something
00:15:37.680 about this story that isn't making sense so until we see what the buyer has in mind for this we won't
00:15:43.840 really know what's happening here all right i got a question for you there's another story sounds like
00:15:50.580 the same story that's every day in in the news but there's another teacher this one's a woman
00:15:56.000 who is allegedly she raped a 13 year old i assume boy um and she ditched her husband for the boy that
00:16:05.500 she called her crystal meth so now when they show the picture of the woman you look at her eyes in the
00:16:15.420 photograph and you say to yourself oh okay i've seen those eyes before you've seen them on adam schiff
00:16:22.700 you've seen them in charles manson you've seen them in aoc
00:16:27.020 and you've seen them in a lot of tiktok videos where people were shaving their heads and acting crazy
00:16:35.740 and so here's my question do you believe that ai can spot crazy people by their eyes if you asked it to
00:16:45.420 let me tell the tell you the answer in advance yes you definitely can if you trained ai to spot
00:16:53.840 people who are mentally ill or at least going to be acting way outside the box of normal behavior
00:16:59.360 you could do it now i don't think you could do it a hundred percent i do think there are some people
00:17:05.960 who just have sort of bug eyes and maybe adam schiff is one of them i don't know but i think you could
00:17:13.540 get eighty percent wouldn't you like to know if somebody's got mental illness just by their eyes
00:17:23.860 okay and that's just by how wide they are i think if you started looking at like you know the pupils
00:17:30.020 you you get a whole different level of knowledge so yes i believe it is inevitable that ai will start
00:17:37.180 trying to spot crazy people by their eyes not crazy but not but maybe uh criminally inappropriate
00:17:46.240 people well in the midst of the busiest news day we're all we're going to talk about all the
00:17:52.060 appointments uh there was a uap hearing uap being the new word for ufos basically and there's a
00:17:59.720 whistleblower uh lou elizondo who says the united states has uap technologies not made by our
00:18:07.240 government or any other government and uh tim gallu day is telling us that uaps represent a new
00:18:17.160 realization that we are not the only advanced intelligence in our universe and allegedly other
00:18:23.180 governments also have some uap technology that they're trying to reverse engineer
00:18:29.240 if i if i may summarize all of this news uh once again there's somebody who does not have a photograph
00:18:38.420 has no personal firsthand knowledge of anything
00:18:43.160 and no i don't believe a single thing about the uap reports not a single thing i do not believe there is
00:18:52.600 an alien intelligence i do not believe there's an ancient civilization of beings that are in the
00:18:59.360 ocean and they've got you know crafts that sometimes come out of the ocean i do not believe one thing
00:19:05.280 about this story do you know why because this story could have been the same story for the last 50 years
00:19:12.100 there's not one time that i've been alive that you couldn't trot down a whistleblower to say that
00:19:17.460 same damn stuff what changed where's my video where's my piece of material that could have only made
00:19:25.540 been made in space nothing nothing there's just nothing so no i could be wrong and normally i would
00:19:37.220 take this as what i call a recreational belief like i want to believe it i'd love to believe it
00:19:42.660 but no this fits every pattern of a thing that hasn't been true and won't be true
00:19:48.500 for the last my entire life basically so i hate to ruin it but i don't think there are any uaps
00:19:57.120 however in the dilbert comic which you would have to subscribe to on either x or the locals platform
00:20:03.100 to see dogbert does have a uap so dogbert's going to be using a dilbert's uap that he invented in his
00:20:12.400 home lab ontario the wait is over the gold standard of online casinos has arrived golden nugget online
00:20:20.240 casino is live bringing vegas style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your
00:20:25.740 fingertips whether you're a seasoned player or just starting signing up is fast and simple and in just
00:20:31.740 a few clicks you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top tier table games
00:20:37.260 make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane
00:20:42.400 moment into a golden opportunity at golden nugget online casino take a spin on the slots challenge
00:20:48.460 yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action all from the
00:20:54.060 comfort of your own devices why settle for less when you can go for the gold at golden nugget online
00:20:59.860 casino gambling problem call connects ontario 1-866-531-2600 19 and over physically present
00:21:07.580 in ontario eligibility restrictions apply see golden nugget casino.com for details please play
00:21:12.860 responsibly well here's my big theme for today are you ready for big theme for today big theme a national
00:21:23.840 national correction is in process meaning that the united states have gone completely off the rails
00:21:30.560 but for reasons that seem to be almost entirely about trump everything seems to have reversed and
00:21:40.080 started moving in the right direction just everywhere now there might be some exceptions of course but the
00:21:47.360 number of things that are suddenly moving in the right direction are mind-boggling jaw-dropping
00:21:55.280 makes your hair catch on fire let me give you some examples
00:22:01.280 now the republicans have the presidency the senate they have it's now confirmed they will have the house
00:22:08.400 by maybe four or five votes and of course the majority in the supreme court
00:22:13.520 so that is clearly the country saying hey these people the democrats were not getting it done
00:22:22.720 so we're going to correct and boy did they correct not only did they correct they gave us a
00:22:28.880 um an advantage in the actual total vote not just the electoral college you know the popular vote so
00:22:35.280 that's big we've seen a couple of soros da's removed in california so as long as the number of soros
00:22:42.720 prosecutors are moving backwards that's great we've seen that elon musk is committed to getting republicans
00:22:50.640 elected so he'll have a sort of an anti-soros fund that will be operating against soros that's great
00:22:58.080 um we see that the trump transition team is considering creating some kind of border review
00:23:07.040 to remove generals and admirals that are too woke and too worthless yes thank you
00:23:15.840 you know i've been telling you for a long time that i was trying to understand why if you see let's say a
00:23:22.160 senator who does an interview on the news even if you don't agree with them and even if you think
00:23:28.160 they're lying you come away thinking okay that's a pretty smart person you know i don't trust them but
00:23:34.800 you know smart and you would see a scientist you say i'm not sure i believe all that but
00:23:42.560 obviously you're smart and generally speaking public figures who have you know reached some some
00:23:49.680 level they're usually pretty smart but whenever i would watch the generals who would come on let's
00:23:56.960 say during the trump administration even before that when they were done i would think to myself
00:24:02.320 why don't they come off as smart like what is general milley
00:24:08.560 just doesn't look like even a democrat senator or he just doesn't come off as smart and i won't name names
00:24:17.680 but there are several others that fall in that category where they're not just not smart they seem
00:24:24.400 almost aggressively dumb and not because of their politics because they don't really get political
00:24:31.120 most of the time so i'm not even judging them on politics i'm just demeanor and presentation and
00:24:37.360 you know just the vibe it's like you know you just don't seem that smart so if you add that to the
00:24:42.960 fact that you know there's wokeness that's infected them and their political appointees
00:24:47.920 in many cases they didn't get all the way there based on talent it was maybe politics
00:24:55.360 it's good to see that there's going to be a tough look and which ones to remove
00:25:00.080 i would argue that lawfare may have ended lawfare against trump may have ended and now that the republicans
00:25:09.680 are firmly in charge i would expect that there will not be more lawfare against republicans what we hope
00:25:18.480 well i guess we don't all hope this but i hope what i hope is that there is not any
00:25:24.800 gross lawfare against democrats i i want to say clearly and you know loudly and publicly i do not favor any
00:25:35.040 any revenge lawfare none i do favor really going after real crimes and to me it seems there are
00:25:45.840 some pretty obvious real crimes that have not been addressed so if matt gates as you all know by now
00:25:52.160 matt gates has been nominated we don't know if he can get confirmed even if there's a recess appointment
00:25:57.680 apparently there's some question about that um but i do love the fact that whoever is going to be the ag
00:26:05.360 whether it's matt gates or or not it's going to end lawfare at least against republicans now i think we have
00:26:14.160 an obligation and a responsibility it's a spider-man problem republicans now have the power
00:26:20.080 power and the republican voters i argue have power over the government that is not the case the other
00:26:28.240 way i don't believe the public has power over the democrat government except to remove them but in the
00:26:34.080 republican world they really do listen to the base and they respond pretty quickly so uh i think that those
00:26:42.160 who support the government should make sure that if you got your choice the best way to keep it
00:26:49.600 is to not go crazy with lawfare when it's just not called for but again nobody's above the law so if it's
00:26:58.000 a real crime and we all saw it and uh there's transparency involved about going after it yes yes on that
00:27:08.080 uh diddy is in jail and hollywood is basically completely neutered in these celebrities that
00:27:14.800 were talking about harris uh they decided to shut the f up after the election because i think they
00:27:21.520 noticed they're not the majority i i think the illusion that hollywood was always under is that
00:27:28.000 they were sort of the leading voices of the rational majority that was sort of the minimum they had to
00:27:34.400 understand about themselves their role in the world well i'm an actor and i wouldn't get involved in
00:27:40.080 this except the majority doesn't have as good a voice as i do because i get attention so for the
00:27:45.520 benefit of the majority i will be their voice and then they found out they weren't the majority
00:27:53.280 i i think that that is the greatest mind f of all time it didn't happen to me
00:27:58.080 so i you know i'm not experiencing it but imagine if you thought you were the majority
00:28:02.400 and you found out you weren't and you and you thought that you were on the side of the angels
00:28:09.600 and you found out you were pretty much supporting a criminal gang because i think the democrats are
00:28:16.720 just filled with rico problems and and uh money laundering and bribery i don't know how much we'll
00:28:22.480 ever uncover but it seems like the entire democratic party is just a criminal organization at this point
00:28:28.000 and by the way i'm not joking about that in in my personal opinion without the benefit of any court
00:28:36.080 cases that would back me up on this my impression is if you look at the totality of what democrats
00:28:43.040 are doing and have been doing it looks like a criminal organization like actually literally
00:28:50.240 it's it's made to move large amounts of money through various organizations that they control
00:28:55.840 and that appears to be the main purpose because the only thing they're always in favor of is moving
00:29:02.880 a large amount of money through any democrat controlled organization it doesn't even matter if it's blm or
00:29:10.640 climate change or anything else large amounts of money move it through a big activity because then
00:29:17.440 they all get a taste that's where the bribery happens that's where the the money laundry happens
00:29:22.560 so to me i think the overwhelming driving force of the democrat party has been money laundering and
00:29:31.280 bribery at the at the working level and then the the voters have just been confused because i think the
00:29:40.080 voters said i'm looking at two political parties and i like the what i like what one of them says
00:29:46.720 but why is it that when i keep agreeing and voting for the one that keeps saying what i like to hear
00:29:52.880 my life is not improving and that's what everybody noticed their life didn't improve they were buying
00:30:00.320 into what the democrats were saying but their life didn't get better and now everybody noticed that's
00:30:05.760 the benefit of having trump having been in office once you just had a direct comparison you could just
00:30:11.200 look at it and say i like that better so i think a more correct frame is that the democrat party
00:30:17.280 in my opinion and again without the benefit of you know court endorsed findings it looks like it's
00:30:26.640 primarily a criminal activity at least at the leadership levels they're they're trading stocks
00:30:33.600 and making deals and getting their gold bars and uh pointing people to jobs that they're not qualified
00:30:39.760 for and it just all looks like criminal to me now when you look at the the republican side let us let
00:30:48.800 us try to find some unity here and let me say this do i believe that there are no republicans trying to
00:30:55.440 get away with stealing money no i don't believe that i'm sure there's some republicans looking to steal
00:31:00.640 some money what i don't see is that it seems like that's their only job the the democrats act like
00:31:08.480 it's their only job it's like everything is pushing in that direction and the republicans are trying to
00:31:14.320 actually you know do a variety of things that seem like they're good for the country
00:31:18.160 all right here's some more corrections so maybe this diddy thing will and the fact that uh there will
00:31:26.320 be a republican ag may take a big bite out of the whole pedophile situation which i've never known how
00:31:32.480 big it really was but hollywood took a beating uh on the election and everything else the old ditty
00:31:39.600 situation is shutting people up and uh here's another one according to fortune magazine
00:31:48.640 trump's election is going to create a dei reckoning that forces companies to either
00:31:54.960 you know double down or to step away from it that seems like really good news so there are now i think
00:32:02.800 maybe 20 companies biggish companies that have canceled or cut down on their dei and there should be more to
00:32:10.960 come but i also expect that when the government says it's illegal so you have to get rid of it in the
00:32:16.240 the government i i think the big companies have to fold i think they have to follow so you may
00:32:23.280 see the end of dei i can tell you that i've heard almost no wokeness for a week
00:32:30.480 it used to be the all the all the news all the zeitgeist was here's some more woke wokeness and then
00:32:39.040 we would complain about it here's some more and then we complain about it and it just never stopped
00:32:43.920 i feel like the wokeness just stopped
00:32:50.000 the people who would even you know bring up these topics they just stopped because now they realize
00:32:56.640 what the public thinks that the entire trans situation which i always like to remind i'm pro
00:33:04.640 trans adults doing whatever they need to want to just living their life the way they want to
00:33:11.200 but of course you know kids and bathrooms and sports are special cases and they have to be educated
00:33:15.920 adjudicated
00:33:16.720 um but i feel like the trans topic will just sort of disappear or not disappear i think it will shrink
00:33:26.000 to the size it should have been naturally its natural size should have been small
00:33:33.200 and maybe we'll just go back to that
00:33:37.760 but again i wish the best for the trans community
00:33:40.720 um cnn and msnbc both look like they're dead that it looks like they're just you know on fumes
00:33:50.560 is the huffington post still alive did the huffington post close and the the daily beast is having
00:34:00.480 problems and gawker closed and um yeah and of course the old version of twitter is dead
00:34:11.040 and now the abc is uh apparently trying to figure out how to bring in a pro-trump voice to the view
00:34:18.000 and maybe some of their other shows because abc got hammered so badly for handling the
00:34:23.520 the debates poorly so imagine how in the world are they going to put a pro-trump voice on the view
00:34:32.480 all right i'll do it i'll do it now i'm going to obviously need to
00:34:38.800 uh identify as a woman but uh if there was one place in the world i could identify as a woman
00:34:46.320 and everybody would shut the up about it would be the view so if you want me on the view i'm willing
00:34:54.240 to identify as a woman i'll still dress the same because i'll be like a poorly dressed woman
00:35:00.080 i'll look exactly the same i'm just very poorly dressed um
00:35:07.600 and i think i'd be great but i'd have to do it at home because i don't want to commute
00:35:11.760 bank more encores when you switch to a scotiabank banking package
00:35:20.560 learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages conditions apply scotiabank you're richer than you
00:35:27.360 think joy reed deleted her x account oh now there is no joy on x oh so that's moving in the right
00:35:40.960 direction uh i will not have to see her mental illness being presented as content um but who
00:35:48.080 else oh don lemon is quitting so don lemon the unluckiest person in media decided that he would quit
00:35:56.320 x on the same week that trump set the entire news business on fire by nominating the most provocative
00:36:05.600 people you could possibly ever nominate and then poor don lemon is trying to get some attention and
00:36:11.840 and i'm i'm quitting what i call twitter because that's an insult to it have you heard that pete
00:36:19.760 hagseth is going to be the secretary of defense i know about you have anybody heard of i'm quitting
00:36:25.600 twitter the attorney general is going to be mac gates maybe i know but also also i won't be posting on
00:36:33.200 twitter sorry don your message has been canceled by bigger news no one cares um meanwhile the star for the
00:36:46.880 disney's disney's uh snow white rachel zegler um she has uh ill feelings about trump and all of his voters
00:36:55.920 so uh that means that disney's snow white movie will lose about a billion dollars
00:37:01.440 so do you think that you could be an actress and get another job if you just cost your employer a billion
00:37:08.880 dollars because this probably cost them a billion dollars because i don't know how many conservatives
00:37:17.360 would have watched this piece of garbage content anyway but once the main actress says fuck you to
00:37:25.520 half of the country half of the country is going to leave that in the you know leave that on the shelf
00:37:30.960 so let's say half the country's children will not be indoctrinated by whatever the hell's on
00:37:37.520 snow white so that's good news ohio lawmakers passed a bill banning biological males from girls bathrooms
00:37:48.880 most of you would call that move in the right direction wouldn't you
00:37:53.120 and let's see did you know that the fema you know that story about the woman who was in charge of
00:38:02.640 one area and she told people to stay away from homes that had trump signs in other words don't help
00:38:11.120 trump voters in an emergency now the first time i heard that i told you i thought oh that's not true
00:38:17.440 i mean that's like an obvious hoax obviously there could not possibly be anything in writing at fema
00:38:24.400 in writing that says don't help trump supporters during an emergency that couldn't possibly be true
00:38:33.440 it's true
00:38:35.920 it's completely true it's worse than that it wasn't just one person the fema worker who got fired
00:38:42.880 says it's not isolated and the fema workers were instructed to do it in the carolinas too
00:38:48.640 according to the gateway pundit
00:38:51.920 it's not only true it was a general fema it was wider than one area it wasn't completely probably
00:39:00.640 now that's the bad news right here's the good news
00:39:07.200 trump's in charge of fema now i guess that just got fixed
00:39:13.280 so here's another thing that got fixed just because trump is coming
00:39:17.280 he's not even there yet and i guarantee you they're getting rid of that rule
00:39:21.520 right did do you think fema is waiting until they get a new boss
00:39:25.840 or they say um let's uh maybe we should kind of quickly revise the way we've been doing this before
00:39:32.480 he gets in charge maybe we should hurry up and clean up our own house and delete all these records
00:39:38.000 so watching how guilty people know they are and watching them change their behavior just in
00:39:45.920 anticipation of trump is pretty awesome it's pretty awesome anyway so those are all the things that are
00:39:55.360 going our way have you ever seen so many things go your way at the same time it really is a remarkable time
00:40:02.400 you know when when trump called it the golden age you always wonder is that hyperbole i don't think it is
00:40:09.600 i i think everything is lining up in a way i've never seen i've never seen or felt anything like this
00:40:16.240 it it's the golden age it's really here now of course we have to make it it's not going to be easy
00:40:24.720 there'll be plenty of challenges but rasmussen did a poll on mass deportations
00:40:30.160 64 percent of likely voters approve of trump's promise to quote on day one
00:40:36.400 launched the largest deportation program in american history to get the criminals out
00:40:43.760 two-thirds of the country is on board with a massive deportation do you think things are changing
00:40:52.000 everything everything is moving in the right direction at the moment
00:40:56.080 meanwhile jack smith one of the guys going after trump in the law fair cases he reported
00:41:05.840 reportedly is going to step down before trump gets into office
00:41:11.840 okay once again we see things are being set right simply by trump is on the way trump hasn't even gotten
00:41:20.320 there to fire anybody yet and they're quitting in anticipation correctly that they will be fired
00:41:27.040 meanwhile chuck grassley and ron johnson have ordered the fbi to preserve or requested to preserve all
00:41:34.080 records on the jack smith investigation yes they're going to investigate the investigator
00:41:42.000 how great is that they're going to investigate the investigator because he damn well needs to be
00:41:46.800 investigated from from a public perspective he definitely needs to be investigated i mean
00:41:53.600 there's some stuff we need to know about that situation
00:42:01.520 uh meanwhile um mark ruffalo you know him from the avengers and other movies um he is he said now
00:42:09.280 about the uh election because he was one of the notable backers of harris he said quote
00:42:15.280 okay this is according to a breitbart headline i said quote we got our asses kicked now breitbart
00:42:25.600 i don't normally like to give advice to publications
00:42:31.200 breitbart you really missed an opportunity here
00:42:37.360 this is the story mark ruffalo said we got our asses kicked here's the headline you should have used
00:42:44.240 hulk sulk
00:42:49.840 you're welcome
00:42:53.360 it's my best joke of the day hulk sulk
00:42:57.920 if you watch the avengers that's pretty funny
00:42:59.760 all right seattle has started throwing shoplifters and petty criminals in jail
00:43:06.080 for the first time in four years i guess the first two years they said it was the uh pandemic
00:43:13.120 you know they didn't want people in close quarters so they reduced their people in jail
00:43:19.200 and then they said they didn't have resources because they probably defunded the police but now
00:43:23.760 they have resources and they have room in jail so they're throwing their petty criminals back in jail
00:43:28.720 so again things are going your way
00:43:36.080 in this big self-correcting country that we have that is so wonderful this week
00:43:40.240 uh joe rogan says that the harris waltz campaign
00:43:44.960 um wanted to make sure that he didn't talk about marijuana legalization if he did an interview with
00:43:50.880 harris now
00:43:53.920 um he said quote i think they had requirements on things that she didn't want to talk about
00:43:59.120 she didn't want to talk about marijuana legalization which i thought was hilarious
00:44:03.120 said joe rogan now here's my question i i was struck in two different ways number one
00:44:13.360 of course the fact that anybody would go to an interview and say there's something that's off topic
00:44:20.080 that's just so weak and especially if the topic is one of national concern
00:44:25.680 and you're ready for office yeah no there should not be anything off topic
00:44:29.840 so so the harris campaign looks weak and pathetic and you can see why they lost however
00:44:38.720 i'm not entirely sure that a private conversation with the campaign should be divulged
00:44:47.760 on the other hand it's a public interest so i'm going to say yes in this special case yes
00:44:57.840 but generally speaking i'm not a fan of anybody revealing a private conversation
00:45:04.800 um but it was somebody running for president and it was a matter of national concern and and you know
00:45:09.520 the event's over there's there's there's no security issue to it now but if she had become president
00:45:17.280 i think that maybe then he should have maybe
00:45:20.960 well i don't know maybe maybe it's still appropriate
00:45:23.440 yeah i'm just sort of thinking that one through as i as i go i just don't like private conversations
00:45:31.200 being revealed unless you have a really good reason i i've revealed a few private things that
00:45:37.280 trump said to me that one time in 2018 when i met him for a few minutes but it was only because they
00:45:43.120 make him look smart so so i feel completely confident that if i say trump knew something was
00:45:49.360 going to happen years before it happened that if he heard that he'd say oh that's fine you know so i
00:45:55.280 don't feel like that's a risk um did you watch the video of biden and trump meeting for their peaceful
00:46:04.960 turnover of power apparently they had a good chat for two hours um uh
00:46:11.440 biden was all smiles i've never seen him so happy to turn over power to hitler do you think
00:46:22.320 that watching him roll over so happily is enough to convince democrats that they've been lied to about
00:46:29.040 hitler coming into office do you think they've figured it out yet because i figure that's enough
00:46:35.280 for at least some of them to say wait a minute you said hitler was coming but every one of you is
00:46:43.680 acting like hitler isn't coming so how did you immediately go from hitler's coming to oh everything's
00:46:51.840 normal how'd you do that were you lying to us the entire time and of course they were lying to
00:46:59.840 the public the entire time but do democrats see it because as obvious as it is to you know republicans
00:47:08.720 the way cognitive dissonance works is that it can blind even a smart person to the obvious
00:47:15.280 so i suspect that even smart democrats somehow are creating in their minds a blind spot to turn off the
00:47:23.440 fact that everybody said he was hitler for sure and as soon as he got elected they acted like he's
00:47:29.280 definitely not hitler though one thing we know for sure like not even a there's not even a chance of
00:47:34.560 it like it didn't even go from definitely hitler to well you better watch out he might be hitler
00:47:42.240 like that would seem like the normal way to step down but it went from he's definitely hitler to
00:47:47.760 there's not really any problem here at all that we see let's uh let's just act totally normally
00:47:53.040 and i think everything will be fine how do you not notice that
00:47:56.320 anyway um that should be the end of the democrat party for a decade
00:48:05.440 do you think that trump made any deals with biden
00:48:10.720 um it's possible although it would be a kind of a risky way to do it you know because things could
00:48:17.120 get out but if i were trump you could imagine a scenario in which he would say privately to biden
00:48:25.040 look um i think you and i should make an agreement we're going to keep our families out of it
00:48:33.440 and i plan to uh to pardon hunter if you'd like me to pardon you or any member of your family
00:48:42.800 i will take care of that but i'm going to ask for the same for you know but basically i want you to you
00:48:50.000 know cooperate basically i don't know would that be illegal to make a deal like that i think the
00:48:57.520 president has that flexibility i don't know if it's all legal but i wouldn't mind as much as i think
00:49:06.000 hunter did some imprisonable stuff i would rather the country climb back from attacking families we should
00:49:14.960 at least get back to mafia standards where the family's left out of it you know you can go as
00:49:21.360 hard as you want at the candidate but just leave the family out of it so you could you can sort of
00:49:26.960 imagine trump saying you went too far with my family i'm not going to return that to you
00:49:35.040 and just say can we make a piece can we can we bury that hatchet now i don't think it happened
00:49:40.720 uh is just sort of a recreationally fun speculation
00:49:48.080 anyway a reporter asked biden as he was in the i guess one of that little ceremonial rooms asked him
00:49:57.280 if he thinks he can get a hostage deal done by the end of the term and when biden was asked if he
00:50:03.280 could get a hostage deal done by the end of the term and for israel biden said quote do you think that
00:50:09.520 you can get a hit in the head by the camera behind you okay so that's what we have and what we're moving
00:50:23.520 to is trump did trump get anything done yesterday yes well trump didn't do this but the senate picked
00:50:31.920 their majority leader thune now i don't know much about this particular senator but there will be a
00:50:40.960 lot of news breaking about him and i believe i'll learn about him soon sorry i had to do that
00:50:51.360 i have some concerns about whether he will really work with trump as well as he says he will
00:50:56.080 i think on most things he will um but he's been he's been critical of trump in the past so he does not
00:51:03.280 count as a loyalist per se uh definitely a loyal republican but not a trump loyalist so we'll see
00:51:13.280 i would say the uh the verdict is out so thune can either be a superstar or or less than that and i believe
00:51:23.120 that uh that is completely in his hands he's a little bit of a blank slate i mean people who
00:51:28.640 really know the inner workings of things may have an opinion but the rest of us don't really have any
00:51:33.680 idea he's just like a brand new character on the stage for most of us so i'm going to say open mind
00:51:41.360 um he might be great but keep an eye on it hey richard great to speak to you
00:51:48.400 that moment right there that's what it feels like to step into a bureau booth our soundproof
00:52:02.960 office pods bring deep focus to even the loudest offices in the bureau booth no construction no
00:52:09.360 distractions just clarity search bureau office booths or visit with bureau.com
00:52:15.520 so as you've already heard matt gates has been nominated by trump to be the attorney general
00:52:23.200 the wall street journal um which is not wild about this says quote in the editorial this is a
00:52:30.000 bad choice for the attorney general that would undermine confidence in the law undermine confidence
00:52:36.320 in the law are you kidding who has confidence in the law how could you possibly undermine confidence
00:52:44.400 in the law it's 2024 we've been law fared way beyond any sense that the law has been operating on our
00:52:53.840 behalf no i don't have any confidence in the fucking law are you kidding me or science or just about
00:53:00.160 anything else at the moment so um and then they noted that gates has a law degree from william mary
00:53:08.960 um but that he's going to cause all kinds of provocations and it's going to be a bunch of
00:53:14.640 problems blah blah blah blah blah now their their argument seems to be that he's a performer and provocateur
00:53:25.440 and that that's the wrong fit for the attorney general can i can i give some uh education to the
00:53:32.240 wall street journal editorial board would you mind if i taught the people who are supposedly experts in
00:53:39.360 business some basic facts about business do you mind if i educate them all right i'm gonna wall street
00:53:47.280 journal editorial board i'm taking you aside let me explain something to you it goes like this
00:53:53.280 um if i if i were to encounter a kitten here's how i would act oh cute little kitten oh here's a little
00:54:02.720 scratch if i were to encounter somebody trying to kill me i would react more like and try to fight it off
00:54:13.600 if i went to a job interview i would act polite and professional if i were elected to congress
00:54:23.280 and i knew that getting attention was just like money i would be provocative in other words because
00:54:29.680 i have a functional brain i will modify my behavior for the circumstances so that i get the best the best
00:54:38.160 pull from this certain circumstance now if the wall street journal thinks that that gates is going
00:54:47.360 to go to the attorney general job and act the same way that he acted in congress where
00:54:52.880 provocation was rewarded and then he would go where provocation is definitely not rewarded
00:54:58.320 and he would not figure that out and you don't think he's smart enough to know that the way you
00:55:02.960 act as an attorney general is different than you act if you're a member of congress especially young
00:55:07.520 member of congress and different than you would act if you were on the supreme court and different
00:55:12.080 than you would act if you were a babysitter and different than you would act in every
00:55:15.840 place in the world how about everybody acts different when the context changes trump does
00:55:24.400 have you ever seen trump interact with say teenagers or the barber shop or the employees at mcdonald's
00:55:31.680 does trump act exactly the same way when he's talking to the employees at mcdonald's as he does when he's
00:55:37.680 talking to the fake news no he modifies his performance to the situation if you don't think
00:55:44.560 gates is smart enough to modify his performance for the situation you shouldn't be writing editorials
00:55:51.760 for the wall street journal i mean that's that's kid stuff this is basic
00:55:59.040 so that's uh that's disappointing from the wall street journal um
00:56:06.560 here's and then of course there's a lot of a worry that uh this is signaling that trump is going to get
00:56:12.640 busy with lawfare maybe so let me let me say this clearly having a loyalist who's as let's say as a
00:56:24.320 whose risk reward profile is what gates is it does open the possibility that we could be um i would be
00:56:34.560 surprised by it but that there could be a little bit of lawfare that you didn't see coming some little
00:56:39.600 revengey stuff now as i've told you too many times i would not be in favor of that at all and i will
00:56:45.520 immediately at least be one of the voices pushing back if i think he goes too far however that is a
00:56:52.960 risk i'm really willing to take right the world is not risk-free but what we have is a situation where
00:57:00.240 the department of justice in my opinion is completely broken and has become a lawfare organization the only
00:57:08.000 person i would trust to dismantle a existing lawfare situation is somebody like matt gates or if i may
00:57:18.000 say exactly matt gates and not even just somebody like matt gates matt fucking gates like he would be
00:57:25.440 my number one choice in the whole world because he's young enough he's aggressive enough he has the
00:57:33.440 you know he has the ear of the president and he's watched the lawfare and presumably some of it was
00:57:39.200 against him so we need more than we need anything in this country we need somebody to go in and just
00:57:46.000 brutally get rid of the lawfare leaning people now does that give you the risk that the pendulum goes too far
00:57:56.560 and then republicans become a little law fairy themselves yes that is a risk and that is your job
00:58:06.640 not just matt gates job not the president's job alone this is your job as supporters of the president
00:58:13.600 if you were or early or even if you weren't you know if you're just acting as a citizen as a citizen
00:58:19.920 you need to be the gatekeepers to make sure that doesn't go too far all right i plan to be very
00:58:27.520 serious about that because it's a legitimate concern if i were a democrat i would definitely
00:58:32.320 be worried about that no doubt about it i'd be worried about that and i think it's our responsibility
00:58:38.000 to make sure that that stays within you know if you broke a real law then that has to be addressed
00:58:45.520 now who would be worried about that well um we've got adam schiff who's a little worried about it
00:58:56.160 and uh yeah so adam schiff is not too happy about the matt gates situation now matt gates might not
00:59:06.000 be confirmed so he might not have enough support um and there might not certainly if he needs democrats but
00:59:14.960 apparently they can do something clever with the rules where if trump um let's see if the two
00:59:23.920 members of congress if the senate and the house do not agree on an adjournment let's say one wants to
00:59:29.680 adjourn and one doesn't um then if they don't agree or they don't agree on the timing of it then the
00:59:36.560 president can adjourn them so once they're adjourned then you can do these recess appointments
00:59:42.640 now i think they're not permanent i think they're two years at two years at most or something like
00:59:49.200 that but you can get a lot done in two years so we don't know for sure if the democrats have a way to
00:59:56.960 thwart that but it'll be fun to watch now the point it and uh matt gates has already resigned his job by
01:00:06.400 the way which as some have pointed out is a total baller move because because he's basically said you
01:00:12.800 know i'm in you know i'm gonna do whatever it takes i'm in on the other hand it might be a practical
01:00:19.520 decision because it also opens up um space and it gives trump another hit on the overton window
01:00:29.360 so the overton window is you create so much news that even if there's some of it that normally would be
01:00:35.520 negative to you you overwhelm it with new news so this would create the situation where trump
01:00:42.640 uh yeah obviously talking to desantis it would be desantis decision could uh i think just select a
01:00:49.520 temporary new um representative is that how it works do i have the process right it's desantis right
01:00:56.400 desantis gets to fill the space until the next election is that correct now who do you think
01:01:02.720 you'd fill the space with well it turns out that laura trump has expressed interest in an interview
01:01:09.840 now she didn't say it directly she just said if asked you know she would of course serve now that's a
01:01:14.880 yes how much fun would that be because she's coming off a what looks like a terrific job
01:01:22.560 um for the rnc and she fits every she checks off every box i mean she's definitely smart enough she's
01:01:32.560 great on tv she's got central casting look she's you know as loyal as you could possibly be
01:01:40.160 it's hard to imagine that there's any box she doesn't check
01:01:42.800 so i'd be for it but it would also be great provocative news to add to the uh the whole cycle
01:01:50.560 then there's also people who say that there's some uh ethics report that might be in the works against
01:01:57.760 gates and if he's no longer in the house then any ethics report would presumably just go away because
01:02:05.520 there's no point in it so there could be several reasons for him to announce he's leaving early
01:02:11.840 um but uh sure made things interesting
01:02:17.920 let's see uh eric swalwell doesn't like it adam schiff doesn't like uh gates being there and uh
01:02:27.120 what do those two guys have in common adam schiff and eric swalwell what do they have in common
01:02:33.040 i think i've told you that uh in the democrat world they have regular liars that would be just you
01:02:41.760 know any senator representative they're going to say things that are exaggerations about trump or
01:02:48.560 maybe they'll spread one of the hoaxes or something but sort of general ordinary political lying
01:02:55.040 but when they need somebody to lie the big lies like the really big whoppers the ones that
01:03:01.280 even the regular democrats won't touch they trot out adam schiff and eric swalwell every time
01:03:08.400 it's always those two right so once you realize that they're the designated liars
01:03:14.320 and that you know the the the ones that come out with them are like you know woodward and brennan
01:03:21.040 sometimes clapper like there's there's this group of people who always accompany the biggest lie
01:03:27.440 lie so the two of the biggest lie guys adam schiff and eric swalwell like oh no they're all over tv and
01:03:35.200 well not on tv in shift's case but they're they're both the vocal ones now i think they both have
01:03:42.720 something to worry about again they should be completely protected against lawfare 100 but
01:03:52.000 it seems to me there are observable behaviors that need to be looked into that a normal reasonable
01:04:01.200 person would say yeah we kind of need to look into that so i don't want it to cross any any barriers
01:04:09.120 into lawfare but uh i can see why they'd be worried all right the choice of peter hegseth as
01:04:15.760 as secretary of defense i'm watching a number of people have a reaction very similar to my own
01:04:25.440 which is what that can't be true p hegseth wait you're talking about p hegseth are you pronouncing that
01:04:36.000 right the you talk about the fox weekend host you know you did you couldn't even get like a weekday
01:04:45.600 host you had to get like a weekend host and then you then you dig down and you find out that number
01:04:51.920 one he's brilliant and he's got you know harvard and yale on his resume and he spent a lot of time in
01:04:59.840 some pretty serious military positions and he was once considered for head of the va the first
01:05:07.280 administration because he's done so much work for veterans and then i said to myself wait a minute
01:05:15.760 he knows the military from the bottom up he is you know definitely uh loyal to trump and then i watched
01:05:24.080 some clips where he's super anti-woke and wants to get rid of all the generals who would be dei and woke
01:05:31.520 people and i said to myself i've never seen any more anyone more perfect for the job and he also has
01:05:39.360 the central casting thing he has the look so i went from this is stupid to is this genius
01:05:47.680 is this is this as smart as it looks because it might be like not yale i saw yale i think i thought
01:05:59.600 there was some yale he had two degrees
01:06:05.200 so i'll take a fact check on that there might be a fact check on his degrees but in any case he is both
01:06:13.440 brilliant and he has enough connections with and experience with in all the right ways the military
01:06:21.360 that he doesn't have to be he doesn't have to do the jobs of the people who would work for him
01:06:26.800 that's their jobs but for the big decision making things the bold changes the getting rid of a general
01:06:33.040 the you know the the big changes that we might need to make in funding and spending and all those
01:06:39.360 things yeah you know what i i say open mind and uh you know i'm sure he was looked at very carefully for
01:06:48.240 that job and uh let's see what happens i i do think that i want somebody i that trump can trust more than
01:06:56.400 i want somebody with experience and i'll say that with no hesitation for that job the experience doesn't
01:07:04.720 count as much because you know it knows how to run itself no matter who the boss is but for the special
01:07:11.200 things that the boss has to do such as fire a general or change the general direction to be more
01:07:17.120 compatible with what trump wants or even just to make sure that when trump says he wants something
01:07:22.240 it actually gets executed and not slow walked so you need somebody who can recognize the slow walk
01:07:29.120 like when something's ordered they go oh yeah we'll do that but it takes five years so and then you
01:07:35.600 need somebody to say no it doesn't it takes two months do it
01:07:41.520 anyway so he might be a great choice tulsi gabbard director of national intelligence
01:07:47.200 uh oh well let me say one more thing about phexa i saw a video uh by don lemon before he left twitter
01:07:54.320 as he calls it i call it x and he was laughing and mocking that p hegseth would be chosen for
01:08:02.080 secretary of defense so let me summarize the situation for you uh there was a guy named don lemon
01:08:11.280 who worked for a network tv outfit there was a guy named p hegseth who worked for a competing tv news
01:08:19.120 outlet probably pretty similar pay pretty similar visibility and uh one of them just got promoted to
01:08:29.840 the secretary of defense in charge of the strongest military in the history of the known universe the other
01:08:38.720 one is don lemon and he just left x
01:08:48.160 okay so you can sort of see why he'd have an attitude about it didn't work out the way he hoped
01:08:56.480 now who else got a good promotion oh somebody else got a good promotion uh there was this woman you may
01:09:02.400 have heard of her she was on the terrorist watch list yeah she was on the terrorist watch list
01:09:07.520 uh that's that's dangerous so but she got promoted to be the director of national intelligence her name
01:09:17.840 is tulsi gabbard yep went from being on the terrorist watch list so she couldn't fly without people
01:09:25.040 following around to the boss of all those people well not all the people in the tsa i suppose but uh
01:09:33.520 that's like the head intelligence shop now is tulsi gabbard the right choice for that i like it
01:09:44.240 i like it a lot yeah i'm all in on that one and again um can you trust tulsi gabbard to be working
01:09:54.640 productively and to be honest with trump yes yes yes yes so love it i think she'll be confirmed rubio for
01:10:09.920 secretary of state now i know some of you are thinking rubio might be too neocon i don't think you have to
01:10:16.880 worry about that at all here's why he's got a boss called trump rubio is not going to be out
01:10:25.440 like doing his own thing rubio is smart enough he's been around enough that he knows what that job
01:10:35.200 is the job is to do the do the work of the president if he has a problem with the president's
01:10:40.160 direction he'll talk to him privately but no do i do i think that rubio has rubio has the experience
01:10:47.440 the personality the the character the i don't know the vision yes yes he has all that could rubio be a
01:10:57.760 president someday yes absolutely i don't know if he'd be my first choice depends who's running
01:11:03.920 um but no i don't have any problems with him at all and i'm not worried about the neocon thing
01:11:10.160 because i think that as long as trump's the boss that takes care of itself um then the the left is
01:11:19.920 running out of insults they can't even figure out how to insult anybody so you may have heard that the
01:11:25.840 doge effort d-o-g-e which stands for department of government efficiency the elon musk
01:11:33.760 effort to make the government more efficient and smaller and cost less um will now be joined with
01:11:39.920 vivek ramaswamy so they will partner on this effort i don't know if they have a ones in charge or or
01:11:46.800 their partners or whatever and maybe they don't need to even have that but what do you think of that
01:11:53.920 let me tell you what lawrence o'donnell on msnbc says he says that musk uh got to quote a humiliating
01:12:01.440 demotion from the head of doge to simply a co-worker with vivek yeah that was a humiliating
01:12:11.520 demotion to find that one of the most capable people we've ever seen even anywhere near our
01:12:18.960 government is going to work on the hardest problem we've ever had to crack which is how do you fix the
01:12:25.200 government now you have to work really hard to turn that positive into a negative
01:12:34.880 it would be like if you found that um ben franklin if he had been alive at the same time
01:12:39.520 ben franklin and thomas edison have teamed up and then lawrence o'donnell would be it's a
01:12:44.800 humiliating demotion for ben franklin and i'd be like okay you realize they're probably better together
01:12:52.400 right humiliating demotion and then you look at lawrence o'donnell's face and he has that mental
01:12:58.960 illness face where his smile doesn't match what he's saying and the humiliating demotion he's like
01:13:05.840 enjoying it too much it's like some weird almost looks like he's masturbating under the desk when he talks
01:13:11.280 almost anyway um there was some concern about uh um security because if you start cutting the
01:13:24.560 government there's a lot of people in the government who are very very bad people and literally murderers
01:13:30.560 so you know or killers let's say but our government includes a lot of people who have killed people
01:13:36.720 right people who are in the military have killed people people in the intelligence community have
01:13:42.640 killed people people in the senate have voted for things like that they knew would kill people
01:13:48.800 so the government is actually the one organization has more killers in it than prison i think as a
01:13:56.960 percentage certainly as a number but don't you think there are more killers literally killers in the
01:14:02.720 government than there are in their prisons because most of the prisoners are not murderers but there's
01:14:08.880 a whole lot of people in the state department the military and the government who have been in the
01:14:13.680 military and literally have killed people right so if you're trying to downsize and take away
01:14:21.520 something that's valuable to the largest group of literally killers that that we have outside of the
01:14:27.360 the military itself you know the active military um it's dangerous so musk actually said on x yeah i have
01:14:34.480 to say that cutting this much waste will make a lot of bad people angry we need extra tight security but
01:14:43.120 joshua hartley on x took it to another level and i boosted this one he said that maybe we should skip the
01:14:51.360 massive inauguration ceremony too much security risk given who you are planning to expose fire and
01:14:59.200 dismantle have been waging shadow wars domestically and internationally for the past 60 years celebrate
01:15:05.680 when balance and order are restored you know what i agree with that as much as i think a um an
01:15:16.320 inauguration ceremony is sort of good for the i don't know the body of the country you know it gives us
01:15:24.560 moments and these moments create the country you know these moments where we all focus on the same
01:15:30.240 thing but i think it's too dangerous to put this government outdoors at this point in time and it's
01:15:38.160 outdoors right now all it takes is well i don't have to give the bad guys any ideas right
01:15:46.640 um i think maybe the era of large outdoor events where you have multiple members of government there
01:15:56.560 like are we going to put our president and our vice president on the same stage
01:16:00.880 are we really going to do that
01:16:04.080 because if if any one of them is on the stage the other one needs to be in the bunker
01:16:10.000 or you know at least the vice president does so and what and what if somebody says it's more
01:16:15.840 than a twofer you know what if you get several of them like some kind of event that kills more than
01:16:22.480 one person this is really scary now trump is uh not likely to back down so i think he is most likely to
01:16:30.880 go ahead and do it publicly but let me just say uh um from the perspective of one citizen
01:16:38.400 this is just my opinion uh this is not worth the risk to me so i'll just say personally that level
01:16:47.360 of risk of going in public with these people that you've chosen especially that's more risk than
01:16:54.240 i'm willing to accept for the benefit of just having a tv event that you didn't really need to do
01:17:00.480 so maybe some of you disagree with me and i would respect that disagreement but we really are in a
01:17:09.040 different time and we don't know the size of the risk and i think all of us have said why are the
01:17:14.480 democrats so quiet it's almost like they have a plan and i don't like any of it so without knowing what
01:17:23.520 the plan is i would assume the worst just assume the worst now it's possible that the reason democrats
01:17:30.400 are so quiet is that they've been thoroughly destroyed and even when they talk among themselves
01:17:36.400 all they can do is argue about whose fault it was probably so there could be two reasons one is
01:17:42.160 they're completely dismantled there's just nobody to talk to anybody or have any good ideas
01:17:47.280 but the other is that they do have a plan and that one that one's scary um we're still waiting for
01:17:55.760 more announcements and more nominations um the one that excites me the most although i'm really excited
01:18:03.440 about all the ones we have so far would be uh hopefully the head of hud will be bill pulte if he's
01:18:11.040 willing to take the job i think he might but he has the whole stack people like he's got the the building
01:18:20.720 industry experience it's his blood he was literally born to it and worked with it he's an entrepreneur
01:18:26.320 he's pro-trump he's the he's one of the best communicators i've ever seen in my life i saw one of
01:18:31.120 his hits yesterday on one of the networks i think it was fox business and i was just sort of looking at
01:18:40.080 the quality of his answers oh my god you know you know how impressed you are when you watch vivek
01:18:47.440 or you watch um your jd vance and you say to yourself we we don't have people who talk that well
01:18:56.240 like this is a whole new game where where somebody's answer isn't just complete but it's right on target
01:19:03.440 hits every point hits all the persuasion points and shows intelligence and and empathy at the same
01:19:10.000 time and that's what pulte has right you have to watch it if you haven't seen him talk just watch
01:19:16.960 how well he answers questions and you tell me that trump doesn't want more of that he does so we don't
01:19:24.400 know if this can happen but hud right now is the you know housing and urban development but i think
01:19:30.640 it would be the natural place that the trump freedom cities would be focused and i think that's
01:19:36.480 the most exciting thing for the future of the country you know ai will be part of it and self
01:19:41.760 driving cars will be part of it and all that but we need to redesign cities so i don't know if i've
01:19:48.320 ever said this directly so maybe there's a reason you don't know i'm so excited about designing cities
01:19:55.120 we need to figure out how to design one that works really well and then reproduce it what we're not
01:20:01.200 going to be able to do is tweak the existing cities they're they're just too structurally hard to change
01:20:07.920 you're going to have to figure out maybe a variety of different flavors of cities designed with
01:20:13.840 completely different uh intentions and different uh organizational assumptions and just see which ones
01:20:21.360 work some will work for some kind of people some will work with others but there's nothing more
01:20:25.920 important because our expenses and our jobs are so focused around building and homes everything from
01:20:34.080 the furniture to the carpenters that if we can if we can reinvigorate the building industry in a way
01:20:42.240 that's not just do some more building that's like one or two percent on the gdp i mean we're talking
01:20:49.280 we're talking really fun then then then we're really having fun
01:20:55.680 anyway uh the head of polymarkets which we talked a lot about um has been i guess his phones and
01:21:03.600 electronic devices have been seized by authorities and we don't know what he's charged with if anything
01:21:09.280 or if he will be but it made uh mike sunovich point out that his own comments about his phone suddenly
01:21:17.040 getting slow did anybody have the experience that their phone started slowing down in the last
01:21:24.640 month or so because i had that experience too my my phone went from battery life lasting all day
01:21:32.400 to maybe an hour or at least it seems like it like it it it's almost useless my phone is almost useless
01:21:40.400 because i always just have to worry about trade um charging it now i thought
01:21:46.800 that apple was doing that thing where they make your phone bad just in time for when you're thinking
01:21:53.280 about an upgrade and i'm thinking about an upgrade and there's a new upgrade cycle coming and then
01:21:59.120 just like before in prior upgrades my phone's battery gets really bad when it's time to look for a new
01:22:05.040 phone and yes it was enough to convince me to buy a new phone i haven't done it yet but i'm definitely
01:22:10.400 buying a new phone because my current one doesn't work well enough to keep now certavich would be on
01:22:19.760 on a pretty short list of people that bad guys would want to see if they could get any dirt on
01:22:25.600 right yeah you you figure if there's any bad guys
01:22:28.480 guys using surveillance in ways that maybe isn't appropriate he would be on the short list i too
01:22:36.720 would be on the short list of people that they would look at if they're just searching around
01:22:40.720 looking for some dirt now in my case they're not going to find anything because as i've told you
01:22:45.600 many times for at least 25 years i've lived my life like there are no secrets meaning that it doesn't
01:22:54.480 mean there aren't things that would be maybe like embarrassing or something but i don't care about being embarrassed
01:23:04.400 so literally anytime i write anything that if if it were found like i'd have to explain it
01:23:12.160 i don't care i'm fine there are plenty of things i might have to explain but okay none of them are
01:23:21.680 going to embarrass me enough that i care so um so i'm not going to make a uh i i guess i won't say
01:23:31.440 that i know what's happening because the the odds that it's just a technology and marketing reason that
01:23:37.680 my phone is dying it's pretty good but it is true that if your phone gets slow it could be an indication
01:23:44.400 that somebody's in it that's true i do believe that my phone is penetrated but i wouldn't know if it's
01:23:50.960 our country or china or anything else but yes i assume my phone is not secure um
01:24:00.960 so the harris campaign we hear from ms oh no we hear from somebody else that uh donated half a
01:24:08.080 million dollars to al sharpton's non-profit before he interviewed her um what is called a softball
01:24:14.560 interview on msnbc now is that an example of money laundering coincidentally his uh his non-profit
01:24:25.040 which i'm sure pays him a salary and maybe pays for some of his expenses suddenly got half a million
01:24:31.600 dollars from the very person that he's going to endorse now how about those other celebrities
01:24:36.960 that got millions of dollars and then also endorsed now on paper it looks like they got their millions
01:24:45.520 of dollars maybe to entertain or maybe to appear but in reality it's to us it just looks like
01:24:56.080 it just looks like money laundering looks like bribery i guess bribery and money laundering are different but
01:25:02.160 it looks like the combination of bribery and money laundering now is it remember i told you earlier
01:25:09.120 this seems like literally everything democrats do it all has the same element where there's a large
01:25:15.760 amount of money that's being pushed through sketchy organizations so everybody can get a taste and it's
01:25:22.080 just over and over and over again this is the reason i think you need to build new cities because the
01:25:27.840 existing cities allow the elected politicians to decide where the big contracts and bids go to
01:25:36.240 which means that all cities are corrupt
01:25:39.920 if you give local politicians the power to decide where the money goes
01:25:45.920 you're guaranteed to have corruption guaranteed that that responsibility needs to be taken away from the city
01:25:51.760 leaders they shouldn't have control over money flowing through the system in that way
01:25:57.440 or there's more transparency you could get to it that way
01:26:02.320 that's central planning
01:26:05.280 um
01:26:07.600 well everything is centrally planned
01:26:11.280 it's just what the center is
01:26:15.760 anyway candace owens has a uh had a whistleblower cia whistleblower
01:26:21.200 kevin chip and he says that martin luther king was murdered by the cia
01:26:27.360 uh and uh which is interesting because trump had promised that he would release those files as
01:26:33.840 well and he says uh that was a cia operation because they considered him a dangerous communist
01:26:39.520 and the fbi was bugging the churches was giving some of the speeches he was a top target for elimination
01:26:45.040 how many of you believe that the cia killed martin luther king
01:26:50.160 i i always just assumed it
01:26:58.720 didn't you always assume that i i don't know when i first started assuming it but i always thought it was so obvious
01:27:05.200 i mean after i was you know at a school you know when i was in school of course i was just propagandized
01:27:13.440 but once i became an adult and started seeing how the real world worked
01:27:17.360 it didn't take me long to piece it together and it wasn't because i saw something on the news
01:27:24.160 the whole time i was like wait a minute so they're saying that the cia or somebody may have killed kennedy
01:27:30.960 and he was provocative but elected president what are the odds that martin luther king was a totally
01:27:41.280 random shooter you know so i i think i'd work that one out on my own that that didn't really look
01:27:48.400 like a coincidence to me so um he was dangerous to the system um so he was considered dangerous to the
01:27:56.960 system now isn't it interesting that the same people who allegedly killed him elevated him to a symbol
01:28:05.760 of uh peace and a model to follow here's what i think i think that martin luther king was elevated by the
01:28:17.280 white leadership of the country because he preached peace and so as long as they focused on the peaceful
01:28:25.200 part they could keep control of the part of the country they wanted to control apparently and they
01:28:32.320 would they would they would use him as their brainwashing operation while at the same time
01:28:36.800 their their internal view was that he was so bad he had to be killed but if they could sell him as a
01:28:43.120 symbol of peace then he could keep future generations passive so i always thought he was just an op
01:28:51.440 well he wasn't the op he was doing his thing but that he was used as part of somebody else's op
01:28:57.360 anyway um there's research in side posts that suggests people are getting more bored because of
01:29:07.760 phones and stuff i will disagree with that because i have not been bored since phones were smartphones
01:29:16.000 how many of you would say the same i i don't remember the last time i was bored but boredom when i was a
01:29:22.000 child was my number one problem my number one problem i was bored out of my freaking skull as a child in
01:29:32.720 school bored in college bored now not in the fun parts but bored in the classes and stuff so
01:29:42.640 boredom's been and i've said this before boredom's been one of my biggest challenges in my whole life
01:29:49.040 and that went completely away when smartphones became workable because i'm standing in line
01:29:56.080 i'm looking at my phone i'm fascinated
01:30:00.080 there's not a time when there isn't something on my phone that fascinates me
01:30:04.560 so i haven't been bored have any of you
01:30:10.240 maybe you're bored you may be lonely more than you're bored
01:30:13.520 uh loneliness is still real i mean that your phone won't solve loneliness
01:30:21.200 and now there's uh thoughts from the harvard crimson is writing about some research
01:30:25.920 that pesticide consumption might be linked to male infertility it's a harvard study
01:30:31.600 so they say if you're eating some fruit that's got thick skin maybe it's not so bad but if you're
01:30:37.840 you're eating thin skin stuff like a strawberry maybe the pesticides are getting in there and
01:30:44.800 maybe you should think of some organic strawberries that are small and weird looking
01:30:53.680 uh that ladies and gentlemen is the conclusion of my incredible podcast for today
01:31:01.200 and i'm going to say a few words to the local subscribers
01:31:06.800 privately i'm going to say goodbye to x and youtube and rumble thanks for joining
01:31:12.480 you've been awesome and what a week it's just going to get better