Episode 2666 CWSA 11⧸21⧸24
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 30 minutes
Words per Minute
147.80289
Summary
In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, host Scott Adams talks about a bomb cyclone that could destroy us if we let it get to us, and how to deal with it, and why you should be able to fake a smile to make yourself happier.
Transcript
00:00:00.240
Tighten your socks, they're going to come right off.
00:00:05.780
As soon as I've got my comments going here, there we go.
00:00:22.560
Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of
00:00:29.560
human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and
00:00:33.040
I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. But if you'd like
00:00:37.760
to take this experience up to levels that nobody can
00:00:41.820
even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains,
00:00:45.920
all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug or
00:00:49.680
flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like
00:00:53.660
coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the
00:00:57.740
day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and
00:01:13.700
So apparently if you're a gamer, one of the ways you can tell that your video game is a video game
00:01:20.800
is that you'll see what's called a server line in your landscape. So if it's one of those games where
00:01:28.820
you can explore large territories, your video game back office might not be able to handle
00:01:37.620
all the complexity on the same server. So you might have to go from a part of the game that's handled by
00:01:43.940
one server to a part that's handled by the other server. And sometimes you can see the line.
00:01:48.560
It's like a straight line, like say, you know, forest or a desert or the ocean or something.
00:01:54.500
And it'd be this unusual little straight line. And then there'd be a little game lag as you go from
00:01:58.520
one server to the other. So one way you could tell if we live in a simulation, if our reality is a
00:02:05.660
simulation, is if you could find one of those server lines. So if you can find a huge straight
00:02:12.480
line in nature that didn't seem to have any explanation, then that means that we have a
00:02:20.240
server line and a different server handles it if you walk over the line. Well, it turns out we found
00:02:26.380
one of those in the Amazon. There's a 10 mile straight line through the forest that nobody has
00:02:30.720
an exploration for. Looks like a server line. So maybe. Now, this is in my recreational belief
00:02:43.220
category, you know, up there with UFOs and other fun stuff like that. I don't necessarily think that
00:02:50.620
we found a server line in the Amazon. But maybe, maybe. Wouldn't that be fun?
00:02:58.220
All right. Well, the bomb cyclone is hidden. That's a bizarre and unusual weather situation that
00:03:05.740
is so dire that they call it a bomb. It's a bomb cyclone. And, uh, I'm at the edge of that bomb
00:03:13.400
cyclone. So far, not so bad. But if the bomb cyclone gets me, I've already prepared my backup
00:03:21.200
plan. It turns out that according to CNN Travel, there's an Italian village that's offering homes for
00:03:27.060
$1 to Americans. Now, non-Americans can also go there, but they, they say they really want the
00:03:33.940
Americans. And the reason the dollars, the reason that the homes cost $1 is that they're worth, um,
00:03:41.860
they're worth $1. They're just, they're just dilapidated crap homes that you wouldn't want to live in.
00:03:49.120
So you'd have to fix them up. So I guess I'd rather have taxpayers than have a bunch of dilapidated
00:03:56.880
empty $1 homes. So there you go. That's my backup plan. If the bomb cyclone gets me,
00:04:02.440
I'll be heading to Italy and I only need to take $1 to get myself a house.
00:04:11.140
Well, there was a study, Scientific America is writing about it, where they put
00:04:14.520
a little electrical stimulation on the corner of people's mouths and they would turn it on and it
00:04:21.420
would make them artificially smile because they'd be activating the little smile muscles on the side
00:04:26.500
of their mouth. And guess what? They found that if they make you smile, you will get happier.
00:04:33.460
That's right. Your mouth can control your brain.
00:04:39.220
Now, you know, what's interesting about that? I wrote about that phenomenon in 2012 or so when I
00:04:45.540
was writing my book that came out in 2013, how to fill almost everything and still went big.
00:04:49.480
And at the time, I considered it common knowledge that science has found that if you tell yourself
00:04:57.580
to smile, if you're not happy, it will improve your happiness chemistry in your brain.
00:05:05.240
So if you just fake a smile and just make yourself do it, it might be able to, you know,
00:05:14.760
improve your brain. But then later, I saw a story that says that was debunked. And so science said,
00:05:25.740
no, those studies are fake. There's no science that says if you do a fake smile, it could make you
00:05:32.300
actually happier. And when I redid the book, I said to myself, I wonder if I should take that out.
00:05:39.480
And I left it in. Do you know why? Because I think I know more than science.
00:05:48.400
My experience as a hypnotist is that that would totally work. Like I don't need a scientific study
00:05:56.240
if you force somebody to smile. Because as I tell you often, your body and your brain are the same tool.
00:06:03.460
We only artificially think there's a brain and then there's a body. They're connected. It's part of
00:06:08.080
one machine. So it's not terribly surprising that it's a two-way machine. You know, happiness makes
00:06:16.000
you smile. Smiling makes you happy. Because there are a whole bunch of mechanisms like that in your
00:06:20.500
body that work that way. I was telling you the other day that if you were not aroused sexually,
00:06:28.420
but if somebody gave you a Viagra and it just did its thing and suddenly you look down and you're like,
00:06:35.440
hey, what's going on here? You would start having sexual thoughts. So your body can make your brain
00:06:41.240
feel a certain way. Your brain can make your body feel a certain way. It's just always been that.
00:06:45.300
So what was the result of the test? Just what I thought it would be, which is artificially making
00:06:52.220
somebody smile makes them actually happier. Their happiness chemistry increases.
00:06:57.920
Now, there might be something else going on in this test because this is also a hypnotist insight.
00:07:06.720
If you do something that makes somebody feel unusual, it will also make them smile and be happy.
00:07:14.460
So when you're a hypnotist and you're putting somebody under in what they call a trance,
00:07:20.260
when a person feels something happening that they know they're not causing directly,
00:07:27.220
but rather that it's being caused by your suggestion. For example, if you said, and this
00:07:32.240
is a common thing to do with hypnosis, if you said your arm is getting light and it's starting to float,
00:07:39.840
if your hand starts going up, you can't get the smile off your face under hypnosis because you're
00:07:47.560
reacting to your body doing an action that you didn't control. It would just make you smile.
00:07:54.360
Likewise, I would imagine if you put stimulants on my mouth and said, hey, we're going to test your
00:08:00.260
mouth and then the stimulants turned on and then my mouth smiled like the joker. How in the world would
00:08:06.040
that not make me actually happy in the real world? Of course it would. It would be just like the hypnosis.
00:08:13.220
If you felt your body doing something that you didn't do, your first just automatic reflex would
00:08:19.960
be to laugh and to get happy. So I'm not sure that the science is, you know, airtight in this case,
00:08:26.900
but I do feel that a fake smile probably makes you happier. Probably does.
00:08:31.880
Well, according to James O'Donnell in the MIT Technology Review, AI can now create a replica
00:08:41.300
of your personality just by talking to you. So a two-hour interview where the AI asks you questions,
00:08:48.880
according to some research from Stanford and Google DeepMind, is enough for it to recreate
00:08:54.680
basically a virtual replica of you with your values and your preferences with stunning accuracy.
00:09:03.940
Hello. Because you all know what I'm waiting for, right? I'm already arranging my trust,
00:09:13.240
my state, to have a trust to maintain the digital version of me in perpetuity. Now,
00:09:20.300
I've been saying it for 30 years that this was always my plan. It's real. I'm actually going to
00:09:28.820
preserve myself in a digital form. Now, what will become of it? I don't know. Well,
00:09:34.180
my organic body will not know because my organic body will, you know, be gone by then. But yes,
00:09:41.700
I'm absolutely positively going to recreate myself in digital form. And this is telling me it's all
00:09:49.240
possible. Because this is the part I was waiting for. I wasn't sure if I could train it well enough
00:09:57.420
that it could reproduce something like me. But now imagine somebody like me who's interested in
00:10:05.360
putting in a lot of time. So they did this in two hours. How much better would it be if you talked to
00:10:11.100
it for two days or two weeks? Just imagine how good it could get at reproducing you. Then imagine it
00:10:17.920
could read all of my books. So it would know everything I thought was important enough to
00:10:23.580
put it in a book. Then it reads all of the text, anyway, from all of my YouTubes and all of my
00:10:29.920
live streams. Two hours a day for 10 years. It's pretty much every thought I've ever had. And yes,
00:10:38.260
you'll be able to reproduce me in scary detail. So that's coming.
00:10:45.740
There's an article in The Federalist by Grayson G. It says, how can Trump make the Nixonian dream
00:10:52.780
of a thousand nuclear power plants a reality? Did you know that Nixon once said he wanted a thousand
00:10:58.680
nuclear power plants? And that Nixon, despite being the disgraced ex-president who had to leave office
00:11:06.120
for his shifty behavior, in many ways, he was one of the smartest presidents.
00:11:12.620
You know, history has sort of got this grudging feeling about Nixon. Well, he did some bad things,
00:11:19.540
had to leave office. But he also said some really smart things. And one of the things he said is,
00:11:27.040
we would get in fewer wars if we had our own secure energy. And he was right. Now, we didn't get to
00:11:35.340
that because of just tons of problems with approvals and technology and whatnot. Safety,
00:11:41.060
all that stuff. But those things are largely solved or solvable. So the real test would be,
00:11:47.820
can the federal government under Trump, and by the way, Trump does like nuclear. He doesn't think
00:11:53.880
it's the only thing, but he likes it. Do you think that the Trump slash Musk slash Ramaswamy government
00:12:01.800
can figure out how to cut enough of the regulatory burden from nuclear power plants
00:12:08.980
so that you could somehow make this all work? I don't know. But apparently there's a group,
00:12:16.400
the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and I think that's what Grayson G is part of.
00:12:22.700
And they came up with an idea to accelerate nuclear in the United States, nuclear power.
00:12:30.420
And they recommend that the U.S. military, with its significant energy demands and presence
00:12:37.880
in Texas, should lead some kind of nuclear technology development through microreactor
00:12:42.740
pilot projects. So while Texas streamlines the permitting and centralized contact, blah,
00:12:50.620
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So Texas, under this plan, would consolidate regulations.
00:12:58.180
So you have fewer entities to deal with and maybe fewer regulations. And the military would take the
00:13:05.220
lead because they already do nuclear, and they need a lot of it themselves. And I saw the really old
00:13:13.780
video with, was it Friedman, economist from years and years ago, who, when he was asked about the
00:13:23.040
Department of Energy, whether you should get rid of it, his immediate reaction was that energy is
00:13:28.520
military. And he thought that energy maybe should be part of the military department that you do keep.
00:13:36.340
And he was in favor of getting rid of as much of the government as you can, right? So Milton Friedman
00:13:41.880
was basically, get rid of as much government as you can. The less, the better. But even he said
00:13:47.700
that you want an energy department, and you roll it under the military, because that's how you stay safe.
00:13:55.880
We think of energy as keeping us warm and powering our cars. But way more important than that
00:14:02.820
is it keeps the wolves away. So yes, I'm, I'm not 100% sure that this is the best way to go. But I love
00:14:11.960
the thinking. The thinking that went into it just tracks. So I like it. According to New Atlas
00:14:21.580
publication, and Michael Franco, regular nut consumption after the age of 70 wards off dementia
00:14:28.720
and disease. So I eat nuts and coffee every day. Because, you know, I believe everything I read.
00:14:38.420
So yeah, it's good for your nuts. So if you want to be long lasting people, eat a lot of nuts.
00:14:49.240
Now interestingly, and this is a probably a coincidence, most of the news today is about nuts.
00:14:55.680
I don't know why. Maybe it's the, it's the curse of that peanut squirrel that got executed for
00:15:05.060
politics. So I think peanut the squirrel is maybe haunting us and making all of our news today about
00:15:12.100
nuts. For example, the next story is from a side post. And it says that they tested that chronic
00:15:19.400
alcohol consumption reduces your sperm quality by altering testicular proteins. Now they only tested
00:15:26.780
it in rats. But it was not good for the rats nuts. So if you want your rats to have really, really good
00:15:36.320
testicles, like I'm talking about the good stuff, not just ordinarily rat testicles, like who cares
00:15:42.060
about them. But I'm talking about like a big bag of nuts I'm talking about. So if you've got a pet rat
00:15:48.500
and you want your pet rat to have the healthiest sperm producing balls, don't let it drink.
00:15:57.400
You probably shouldn't drink either, because I'm just guessing it's bad for your balls too. But they
00:16:02.000
only tested it on the rats. So keep your rats balls healthy. Stay away from alcohol.
00:16:08.500
Speaking of nuts, Instagram has a new feature to keep people from going nuts. You can now reset your
00:16:20.000
algorithm. So you know how your algorithm slowly learns who you are. And then it starts feeding you
00:16:26.200
more of the things that it thinks you like until you're just watching, you know, the same thing all
00:16:31.620
day, which happens to me a lot. Apparently now they have a thing where you can give it a fresh start,
00:16:37.100
they call it. And especially for teens, you can just clear all the user recommendations and it will
00:16:44.500
act like you're a brand new user who had never used it before. Now I'm going to give meta and
00:16:50.620
Instagram a big thumbs up for that. Does that answer all of your questions? No. But to have that
00:16:59.000
option, that feels really good. Like I would think that this is the kind of option that probably saves
00:17:06.080
lives. I'll bet there are some people who, if they didn't reset their timeline, it might actually
00:17:14.900
kill them, you know, because they'll take a bad, it'll put them in a bad, you know, frame of mind or
00:17:20.900
who knows what. So I'm very up on this. There's a lot more that we need to do to protect people's
00:17:27.580
health, I think, from social media. But yeah, a button to get rid of the, get rid of the algorithm.
00:17:35.580
Why not? Now I would go a step further. I would rather see a checklist of what the algorithm has
00:17:43.120
decided I would want to see more of. And then I would just deselect some things, right? Because
00:17:49.240
there might've been that one day there was something in the news and you looked it up, but it's awesome.
00:17:53.180
It's awful. Like you don't want to see it ever again, but you were curious that one day I want
00:17:58.360
to deselect that. I want to never see it again. So let's do that. When I found out my friend got
00:18:05.440
a great deal on a wool coat from winners, I started wondering, is every fabulous item I see from
00:18:11.740
winners? Like that woman over there with the designer jeans. Are those from winners? Ooh,
00:18:17.440
are those beautiful gold earrings? Did she pay full price? Or that leather tote? Or that cashmere
00:18:22.240
sweater? Or those knee-high boots? That dress? That jacket? Those shoes? Is anyone paying full
00:18:28.220
price for anything? Stop wondering. Start winning. Winners find fabulous for less.
00:18:35.100
MIT News says that MIT is going to be giving away their education for basically free if you're
00:18:43.320
below a certain income level. So if your family income is below $200,000, you can attend MIT tuition
00:18:50.240
free starting in 2025. MIT. Free. What? Now, if you don't follow college things, MIT is where the
00:19:04.980
smartest of the smart go. MIT is literally the college that my Dilbert cartoon character graduated
00:19:11.440
from. It's the Thomas Massey school. It's the school where if somebody says they graduated from MIT,
00:19:20.080
then you should listen to everything they say after that. Because it's going to be smarter than whatever
00:19:25.920
dumbass thing you were thinking. Right? MIT is the real deal. Like, I once gave a speech at MIT
00:19:33.520
early in the Dilbert years. And I remember looking into the audience, and I've never seen so many
00:19:41.520
people in one audience that wore corrective lenses. Now, I'm sure it's different now because of LASIK and
00:19:48.320
everything else. But I looked into the audience, and it was just a sea of people with corrective
00:19:54.620
lenses looking back at me with my corrective lenses. I remember standing there and saying,
00:19:59.240
I found my people. I found my home. Like, if I could just go live at MIT, you know, if I didn't
00:20:06.840
have to take classes that I couldn't pass, just hang out with all the nerds with their corrective
00:20:13.060
lenses, it'd be like my heaven. So, very, very pleasant place to be. Anyway, so if you're under a
00:20:19.500
certain income, under $200,000, you will pay nothing for tuition. You'd still have to pay to, you know,
00:20:26.300
cover your cost of living. But if you're even less well-off under, let's see, if you're under
00:20:35.840
$100,000, that's combined, you're both of your parents, if they make less than $100,000 a year,
00:20:41.500
you pay nothing at all toward the full cost. How is this even possible? How do they do that?
00:20:50.300
You can actually attend and go there. It's just free. So, now, if this were not MIT, do you know
00:21:01.840
what I'd say about it? I would say, I'm not sure they thought this through, but it's MIT. So,
00:21:10.060
I'm going to say the opposite. Oh, whatever I think is a bad idea is probably stupid because
00:21:14.980
everybody who thought about this at MIT, every one of them is smarter than me. Every one of them.
00:21:21.820
Like, 100% of the people who worked on this policy, every one of them, they're all smarter than me.
00:21:28.820
So, it would feel weird for me to say it's a bad idea. So, I'm not going to do that. It's probably
00:21:35.000
brilliant. And it's probably getting ahead of what is obvious. And here's what I think is obvious.
00:21:40.860
The cost of higher education is going to approach zero. So, they're probably just getting ahead of
00:21:49.200
it in the way that's best for society, you know, helping the lower end people first. Now, of course,
00:21:56.700
this doesn't help everybody because getting into MIT at all is just about the hardest thing in the world.
00:22:02.680
So, it's not like it's free college for everybody. It's still very selective.
00:22:09.900
But, if you said to me, Scott, under the era of Trump, what's he going to do about DEI and CRT and ESG?
00:22:18.580
And I would say, get rid of all those things. And then you would say to me, but, but, that wouldn't be
00:22:24.960
fair. And I would say, you know what? Look what MIT is doing. There, there are now zero, zero poor
00:22:33.780
people of any color who, if they could qualify for MIT, and which would be very hard, free education.
00:22:41.660
So, that's one way to get there. Psyblog has a study written by Jeremy Dean. He's talking about it.
00:22:53.260
Dr. Jeremy Dean. Apparently, if you think that your ideas are better than other people's,
00:22:59.720
you might be right. So, they did a study to find out if smart people can tell they're smart.
00:23:06.800
How do you think that turned out? Do you think that the smartest people in the world
00:23:12.540
are aware that they're smarter than other people? Well, they did a study to find out,
00:23:20.380
and it turns out they did know. Do you know why they knew? I may have mentioned this.
00:23:26.540
They're the smart people. So, let me think. Could I have predicted this ahead of time?
00:23:32.580
Is it possible that smart people get the smart answer more often than dumb people? Smart people
00:23:40.720
versus dumb people, smart people? I don't know. It's a toss-up, but I'm going to go with smart people
00:23:45.860
are smart, and they can even tell that they're smart. When I pet my dog, I don't need to give her any
00:23:55.820
calculus tests because I know she cannot solve a calculus problem. Now, I also know that I can't.
00:24:03.420
But if it were an easier problem than that, I might be able to solve it, and she couldn't. So,
00:24:07.300
that was a bad example. But I'm just saying that neither my dog nor I can do calculus. That's the point.
00:24:13.720
So, anyway, I saw a study. So, there's some study that says that I'm going to call it a study,
00:24:27.000
but then I'm going to insult it so you won't think it's a study when I'm done,
00:24:31.760
that the COVID vax saved 20 million lives. Does that sound right to you? Do you think the
00:24:39.180
vaccination saved net, you know, some people obviously would die from any chemistry, put it
00:24:46.140
in their body? There's always going to be somebody who's going to have adverse effects. But do you
00:24:49.580
think it netted 20 million? Does that sound right to you? Here's a better question. How would they
00:24:56.980
calculate that? Would they count all the people who have died from it? And would they have accurate
00:25:06.880
data? Do you think they'd have accurate data? And if they compared the data from, let's say,
00:25:11.960
different states and from different hospitals and from different countries, do you think all that
00:25:18.320
data would be apples and apples? Do you think there would be any assumptions involved? Do you think that
00:25:25.580
the assumptions that are put into the study would drive the study entirely? Or do you think that
00:25:33.940
the assumptions weren't important? Well, it turns out that this thing you think was a study
00:25:40.040
was nothing but somebody came up with a bullshit algorithm that if you plug in your assumptions,
00:25:46.460
it'll tell you how many people lived or died. That's right. It's just a formula like a climate model.
00:25:54.900
It's like a climate model that you make your own assumptions about what was true,
00:26:00.260
and then you put your assumptions in it, and then it tells you, based on your assumptions and a climate
00:26:05.700
model that presumably is not accurate. No, this is complete bullshit. Now, Professor Norman Fenton
00:26:14.240
does a good job of explaining why it's complete bullshit, and you have to see the degree to which
00:26:22.200
I'm going to say science is laundered. It's almost like money laundering.
00:26:27.120
So they launder science through these weird algorithms and projection models. And if you're not
00:26:34.720
sort of tuned into what is science and what is bullshit, you would think it's just more science.
00:26:42.280
It's like, oh, they did some science and they made a vaccination. Then they did some more science
00:26:46.880
to study how well it did, and now we know. Saved 20 million. Good job, science. No, that's not what happened.
00:26:53.220
They used some science and they made a vaccination, and then they have no way to know if it worked,
00:26:59.100
basically. You wouldn't need the algorithm if you could just count it. So apparently you can't count
00:27:06.680
it. The data doesn't allow that. There's no data from the pandemic that's good. I'm going to tell you
00:27:14.080
this a million times until every one of you knows it. There's no data related to the pandemic
00:27:21.140
that you should trust. None. None. Not if it says it killed everybody. Not if it says it saved
00:27:27.440
everybody. Not if it says it's somewhere in between. There's nothing. There's nothing that's
00:27:33.080
even a little bit believable about what came out of the pandemic. And honestly, I don't even have,
00:27:41.560
I'm not even leaning one direction or the other. I would say it's obvious at this point that there
00:27:47.440
were, there were more, you know, more damage, especially to young people than was told the
00:27:53.560
public. So that, that part's pretty clear, but I'm still not entirely clear if even super old people
00:28:01.380
got some extra years of life. I don't really know because I don't believe anything I read about the
00:28:07.780
topic. All right. So there's a story, uh, RFK Jr. was talking about his, uh, voice issues called
00:28:15.400
spasmodic dysphonia. But what he added to the mix was he thinks it's possible. He got the condition as
00:28:21.580
a result of taking a flu shot because it happened apparently around the time he got a flu shot.
00:28:28.540
And then he looked at the list of just, I think there were just hundreds of possible side effects
00:28:33.840
and it's actually listed as a side effect. I'd never heard of that before. I mean, I had, I had
00:28:39.920
spasmodic dysphonia. I had it for three and a half years and I got rid of it with surgery. It's
00:28:45.440
incurable, but I cured it. Well, let's give the surgeon some credit for that. But, um, so do you
00:28:55.080
think given that it's one of the side effects and that he got the shot and then he got that?
00:29:05.580
Are you convinced? Well, here's what I do know. So the people who are deeply into this world of
00:29:14.020
spasmodic dysphonia as I am and have been know that almost every person you talk to will tell you
00:29:20.680
that it came to them after a normal respiratory problem. So they got a, something like a normal
00:29:27.020
cold or a normal flu. And then they use their voice incorrectly. So this is exactly what happened
00:29:36.120
to me. So I got some kind of bug that gave me laryngitis. So I got a normal laryngitis,
00:29:42.180
you know, laryngitis where you just go, I tried to talk. I can't talk. Now that doesn't sound like
00:29:48.500
spasmodic dysphonia at all. Spasmodic dysphonia is where you're, you're clipping words. This would
00:29:55.500
be spasmodic dysphonia. If you're trying to order a Diet Coke, you might say, oh, that doesn't sound
00:30:04.480
anything like laryngitis, which is, I want to do this. But normal laryngitis, if you keep trying to
00:30:13.780
talk through it as I did, cause I was on a vacation and I kept trying to yell to step kids and, you
00:30:20.700
know, yell over noise and talk in restaurants. By the time I was done, it had triggered a full-on
00:30:28.940
spasmodic dysphonia that lasted for three and a half years until I searched the planet and found the one
00:30:34.000
surgeon in the world who had a surgery that could fix it. And he did. Now, I also got the condition
00:30:44.960
at age 49. And unless it's changed, it used to be that age 49 is actually the most normal age that
00:30:54.100
happens. It's the median age. I got it at exactly the median age that the literature says that's when
00:31:03.920
it happens. Exactly then. And it also came after a respiratory problem. And then when I checked with
00:31:10.820
other people who have it, cause you know, you end up meeting a lot of other people with the same
00:31:14.000
condition. They all have the same story. I was, oh yeah, I had this respiratory problem. And next
00:31:18.860
thing you know, I've got this. So you've got two possible hypotheses and there might be more than that.
00:31:25.420
Um, I guess RFK Jr. was 42. So 49 is sort of the most normal place that happens. He was 42.
00:31:34.860
So he was definitely within that range of when it happens, no matter what you're doing. Now, could it
00:31:40.400
be that it's caused by more than one thing? I think so. To me, that sounds reasonable. There's no reason
00:31:49.380
that only one thing could cause it. And his doesn't sound exactly like mine. Um, and there are a few
00:31:55.320
flavors of it. So maybe, but the only thing I want to add is that if you think that it's all caused by
00:32:01.140
vaccine injury, um, I'm close to certain that that's not true. If the question is, could it have caused it
00:32:10.760
in one case? Because spasmodic dysphonia, you know, existed long before the vaccinations did?
00:32:18.320
So, or did it? Hmm. Well, actually, you know, I need to check that. I don't know when the name
00:32:25.100
spasmodic dysphonia was first introduced to the public. Hmm. What did come first? The shots or the,
00:32:33.860
ah, I guess I should look that up. Anyway, uh, it is uncertain what is the cause, but there might be
00:32:38.720
more than one. And, uh, for those who are looking for the surgical cure, I posted on X, um, the
00:32:47.760
contact that cured me, Dr. Gerald S. Burke, MD at UCLA's head and neck surgery. So if you're listening
00:32:57.360
to this and you know somebody who has spasmodic dysphonia and you want to get them help, you would go
00:33:02.020
to Google and you would search for Dr. Gerald Burke. Gerald is spelled G E R A L D. Burke is spelled with
00:33:10.440
an E on the end. B E R K E. If you just search for him, um, and, uh, you could probably search for
00:33:19.640
head and neck surgery. He'll pop right up. There's a phone number there. You can call the office and
00:33:23.820
book, uh, book your, uh, interview. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold standard of online
00:33:32.140
casinos has arrived. Golden nugget online casino is live bringing Vegas style excitement and a
00:33:37.920
world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned player
00:33:42.520
or just starting signing up as fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access to
00:33:48.000
our exclusive library of the best slots and top tier table games. Make the most of your downtime
00:33:53.300
with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity
00:33:58.940
at golden nugget online casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables or
00:34:04.300
join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action all from the comfort of your own
00:34:09.360
devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at golden nugget online casino. Gambling
00:34:15.820
problem? Call connects Ontario. 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over physically present in Ontario.
00:34:22.720
Eligibility restrictions apply. See golden nugget casino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:34:28.980
All right. Uh, according to zero hedge, 63% of voters in my area, my County demanded a recall
00:34:37.200
of our Soros backed Bay area district attorney, Pamela price. And she has just now conceded that
00:34:43.700
she lost and she's stepping down. Wow. Talk about the golden age. What could be better than having a Soros
00:34:57.540
funded DA removed by the public, by the public? The, the government was never able to do this.
00:35:07.140
The government failed us completely, but you know, who, who did not fail us? Apparently the founders
00:35:14.700
because the founders created a system which allowed this, you know, direct recall thing to become a law.
00:35:22.360
And then the voters decided we're not going to put up with us. And they got rid of, they got rid of her by 63%.
00:35:32.020
Now, keep in mind, this is the bluest of blue. We're talking super blue here. We're in California.
00:35:38.940
The bluest of blue, almost two thirds of them said, you got to get this shit out of here. This is no good.
00:35:44.060
Right. And they did. Now, what could make me more optimistic and what could be a bigger deal than
00:35:53.720
finding out that George Soros's DA thing might be crumbling under its own weight? Oh, I got something
00:36:00.580
for you. I'm now going to tell you the most important story in the world that maybe you haven't heard yet.
00:36:08.360
Now, you're not going to necessarily think this is the most important story in the world.
00:36:12.720
But I'm going to tell you with that complete confidence that we heard about earlier,
00:36:18.660
you know, where smart people think their opinions are better than other people.
00:36:23.100
This is one of those cases. Yeah. I think my opinion on this is better than
00:36:27.380
maybe yours, unless you agree with me. And then you're brilliant. If you agree with me,
00:36:32.180
you're brilliant. Right. This is the biggest story in the world.
00:36:35.720
And Fox News is reporting it. Elon Musk expressed interest in meeting Alex Soros.
00:36:45.360
And Alex Soros said on X, I believe, quote. Oh, so Musk said to Alex, I would be curious to meet
00:36:56.680
and understand your goals better. So that's what Musk wrote to Soros on X. And Alex Soros said,
00:37:03.640
quote, also on X, I often learn most from people whose views are different from my own. Open to meeting.
00:37:10.240
There it is. Elon Musk just searched the world to find the keyhole to stick his key.
00:37:26.080
And he just found it. He found the keyhole to the world.
00:37:31.580
You know, I've been telling you for a while that if the Soros organization is so influential,
00:37:38.740
why are they not on the news every single day? Why isn't Alex Soros on The View?
00:37:45.520
Why is Neon Fox News explaining what he's doing? If he's the one who's, his money anyway,
00:37:52.380
is one of the biggest influences in America, don't we need to hear from him?
00:37:56.760
But here's what's different. If I said, Alex Soros, do you want to go on a
00:38:04.420
tough, hard-hitting interview for Fox News? I would expect him to say no. There's not much in it for
00:38:10.580
him. If I said, but how about we send Michael Schellenberger to ask you some tough investigative
00:38:18.520
journalist questions? I would expect him to say no. Again, because what's in it for him?
00:38:26.760
Yeah, because you know it's not going to go his way. So you've got this keyhole that
00:38:33.420
basically is the thing that turns on the engine of the world, apparently. It seems to be affecting
00:38:38.620
everything we care about. And nobody can get near the keyhole. Unless you're the richest guy in the
00:38:45.800
world, you're Elon Musk, and you're everyone's dad, and it's very clear that you don't have bad
00:38:53.400
intentions. You're not trying to be the dictator. You're not trying to be the next president. You're
00:38:59.660
not trying to win any election. He's not going to run for any election. He simply is one of the
00:39:05.800
smartest people we know. And he's looking to solve a problem. And there's a mystery to it. And Alex
00:39:12.640
Soros is the center of that mystery. Why are you doing this, Alex? And this is a question I've been
00:39:19.640
asking on his ex account and other places. Why are you doing this to us? Because he's doing
00:39:25.420
something to us. He's not really doing something for us. Or at least it doesn't strike me that he's
00:39:32.700
doing something for me. It looks like he's doing something to me. And I think, you know, I don't
00:39:38.220
want to read Elon Musk's mind, but he seems to be as puzzled to understand his motivations.
00:39:44.660
Because usually you understand people's motivations. You might not know their strategy,
00:39:49.720
but you know what they want, right? Alex Soros is the only person that I can say unambiguously,
00:39:56.940
I don't have a clue. I have no idea why he does what he does or why the Soros organization does what
00:40:04.460
it does. The only thing I can imagine is that they're captured by the intelligence entities and
00:40:11.480
they just do what they're told to do. But would he say that? And if he were asked directly,
00:40:18.940
would he admit it? This isn't the fun part yet. You want to get to the fun part?
00:40:27.620
Probably nobody has more dad energy than Elon Musk. And if I were Alex Soros, I don't know how
00:40:40.060
much dad love I'm getting. You know what I mean? Does Soros Sr. give a lot of dad love to his
00:40:47.420
children? Does he look like he's full of empathy? And I don't know. I've got a feeling that Alex
00:40:54.380
Soros may have been under-parented. It's just a feeling. And if you introduce Elon Musk, the ultimate,
00:41:04.440
well-meaning, smart, credible dad figure, what happens to the two of them? Do they have one
00:41:14.400
conversation and then that's over? I don't think so. I think they stay in touch.
00:41:21.780
I think they touch bases often. And then I think Alex realizes that he can't defend some of his
00:41:31.160
actions to his good friend and dad replacement, Elon Musk. Here's what I don't think anybody fully
00:41:39.480
understands about Elon Musk. He apparently has powers of persuasion that are unbelievable.
00:41:51.780
I don't know exactly what tools and techniques he uses, but he's clearly studied it, as he has many
00:41:59.840
other domains and mastered them. He has kind of mastered persuasion. Now, he'll still say things
00:42:06.940
that get people buzzing, but even those work because they bring energy to him and then we listen to him,
00:42:12.900
blah, blah, blah. So he became so credible that he could become partners with the elected president of
00:42:19.480
the United States and the entire country goes, hey, you can't just, oh yeah, yeah, why not?
00:42:28.300
Who else could have done that? Who else could have pulled off Doge? I mean, it hasn't been pulled
00:42:34.600
off yet, but the fact that it's maybe the top thing that the country is looking at, who else could have
00:42:40.600
done that? Nobody else. That's not just being able to do it. It's not just having the capabilities.
00:42:46.220
It's not just being smart or patriotic. You've got to be really persuasive.
00:42:53.020
The level of persuasion that Elon has now, because part of it is based on his credibility of doing
00:43:02.240
things that are good for the world. If he hadn't built Tesla, if he hadn't built SpaceX,
00:43:07.000
he'd have a lot less credibility. But you take his level of credibility, you take the persuasion
00:43:17.080
powers that I know he has accumulated. His talent stack for persuasion is probably incredible now.
00:43:23.160
You put him in a room with Alex, who in my opinion is lost.
00:43:27.160
Now I'm seeing it from a distance and I can't read any minds. So, I mean, I could be way off,
00:43:34.040
but Alex Horace looks like somebody who could use a big brother. You know, maybe it's a father figure,
00:43:41.400
maybe it's a big brother, but he seems like somebody who could use some good advice.
00:43:46.200
And I don't think we can fully predict what happens when the matter and the antimatter meet,
00:43:54.680
because they couldn't be more opposite. But if you put them in a room and wait two hours and then
00:44:00.520
they leave the room, do you think that Elon Musk will have adopted some of Alex Horace's beliefs?
00:44:07.000
Or will Alex Horace leave the room saying, you know what, I got to think about this.
00:44:10.600
You know the answer to that. Alex Horace will walk into that meeting saying, I really have to rethink
00:44:18.040
this. Elon Musk will walk into the meeting, Elon Musk. He's not going to change a bit.
00:44:27.320
Why? Because he already got to all of his opinions from, you know, first principles,
00:44:32.760
start at the bottom. How does this make sense? He didn't have any opinions given to him.
00:44:38.760
Like nobody gave him an opinion to the uncritically accepted and then got surprised later.
00:44:45.240
Right. But I've got a feeling that Alex Horace grew up in a environment in which right and wrong
00:44:51.800
were just sort of assigned. And he's just taking the legacy forward. So the oil and water of that
00:45:00.120
is incredible. But here's the other thing that might be important. What if they're both nice guys?
00:45:08.760
I don't know if that's true. I mean, I've never met either of them personally. But what if in person
00:45:15.320
they just get along? That would change the entire world. Everything would change if they just like
00:45:23.400
each other. And they might. Because when I see pictures of Alex Horace just hanging out and partying
00:45:30.600
and stuff. I have two thoughts. Number one, I don't want him controlling my country because he looks
00:45:36.600
like he's having a good time and the good time looks like it's more important to him. Number two,
00:45:41.160
I think he'd be fun to hang out with. It looks like he's just like a fun, just a fun guy. You know,
00:45:49.880
I've got a feeling if you were partying with him, you'd be glad you were. So what happens if they just
00:45:55.160
like each other? And they just get along. It could change everything. But let's talk about
00:46:01.880
some more personalities. So that's the biggest story in the world right now. Can't wait for them to meet.
00:46:09.800
Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:46:14.280
Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,
00:46:20.200
you're richer than you think. Do you remember when we were told by the news
00:46:27.080
that Trump is a dictator with dictator personality? He wants to do dictator things. And the only thing
00:46:32.920
that matters is what's good for Trump. And that's Trump, Trump, Trump, dictator, a narcissist dictator.
00:46:39.640
Does any of that sound familiar? Like everything we heard every day. Now, here's your reality.
00:46:45.000
He just put together a team of pirates, most of which were not even Republican until recently.
00:46:53.320
So he's the one who has the most people who were opposed to him working for him. That's your
00:47:00.120
dictator. They all volunteered. He said, yes. It's the first time I think in history
00:47:07.320
that we've ever seen a politician win the presidency and then say, by the way, this hugely credible,
00:47:15.720
powerful, smart, influential person named Elon and this amazingly talented, brilliant force of nature
00:47:23.160
called Vivek are going to do two of the most important things that need to be done, which is
00:47:28.360
get our debt back in control and, you know, tame our government size, et cetera. And he's going to let
00:47:34.600
these two unelected people do it. Why? Because they can. Because they can. Because they want to.
00:47:45.080
Because they have the skills. And we've never seen this before. Which dictator gives that much
00:47:50.840
authority away? Do you know how much credit Elon and Vivek will get if they pull this off?
00:47:57.880
Unbelievable. Unbelievable. How much will Trump get? He'll get a big share. He's sharing credit
00:48:08.680
on his biggest play. He's sharing credit. Is that what the dictator does? Do you ever hear Putin say,
00:48:17.480
you know, I got to be honest. A lot of the good work was done by my general over there.
00:48:22.360
I'd like to give him a call out. No. Does President Xi say, you know, honestly,
00:48:28.280
a lot of this work was done by other people. You know, I was in charge, so I get some credit. But
00:48:33.800
really, really the other people. And here's this private citizen who did so much that, you know,
00:48:39.800
if he could run for president, I think he'd get elected. Dictators don't do that.
00:48:44.680
So you're watching this dictator who is bringing people into the power structure in a way we've
00:48:54.600
never seen. And who else is in the inner circle of his power structure? Barron. Barron. So we've
00:49:04.280
got the president of the United States, this guy who only wants what he wants and everything's about
00:49:10.120
him and he will not listen to anybody. He's taking great advice from apparently a very bright team,
00:49:17.800
I guess, you know, 18-ish. He's taking advice from the smartest people we've ever seen in the
00:49:23.800
public domain, you know, Vivek and Elon. He's got a pirate ship full of people who didn't agree with
00:49:30.440
him until recently and realized that they can work with him to get some important stuff done.
00:49:34.680
He could not be more opposite of whatever that idea is that everything's about him and only his
00:49:43.640
ideas matter and it's all narcissism. He has already delegated more power than I've ever seen.
00:49:51.000
So there's that. Let's talk about some of the people. There's a lot of talk about the nominees,
00:49:57.960
so it's a lot of people heavy today. So Pete Hegseth, I guess the criminal report became public.
00:50:10.520
Now, no charges were filed and as somebody smarter, maybe it was Megyn Kelly said this,
00:50:16.600
that part of the original complaint was that there was a woman who went to a hotel room with him,
00:50:22.680
allegedly, and had some what we think was probably consensual sex, but later she said it wasn't and
00:50:29.560
then she said she might have been drugged. Now, did you see what the result of the toxicology was?
00:50:38.360
Did anybody see that? I think they did confirm that she had, you know, DNA in her so that there was
00:50:43.880
something physical to happen. Now, but she claimed that she was drugged, you know, like a rape drug.
00:50:50.440
So do you remember what the toxicology report said about that? No, you don't, because there was no
00:50:58.040
toxicology report. Do you know why the charges were not filed? Because the police didn't believe it
00:51:06.520
happened. That's why. Yeah, the police weren't convinced it happened. Now, I don't know if they
00:51:14.680
did a toxicology test and it came back negative. I don't know that. But if it came back positive,
00:51:21.320
don't you think you'd heard about it by now? No, it didn't come back positive. So whatever her excuse
00:51:28.040
was for not being consensual, apparently the police just said you drank a lot and you just went and had
00:51:36.360
sex with a really good looking celebrity. Okay. Because your husband found out, right?
00:51:43.480
Maybe. So you had to tell your husband that it wasn't because you were attracted to a super
00:51:52.040
attractive celebrity. It was because maybe he drugged you, right? Well, I don't know. I felt
00:52:01.560
something. Maybe he drugged me. Okay. If you can't convince the police,
00:52:07.960
and I think that they want to be convinced, right? I feel like, I think the weight of evidence
00:52:17.080
leans toward Pete. So, you know, you and I can never know what's true. But if I had to give him
00:52:24.520
the benefit of doubt, I could give it easily. I can go further than innocent to a proven guilty.
00:52:31.400
I can go all the way to there's no evidence. Yeah. That's even better than no proof.
00:52:38.200
There's not really evidence, except one claim that even the police didn't believe.
00:52:45.960
Let's talk about some other people. Did you know that there are governors that are organizing and
00:52:53.000
some people organizing to be anti-Trump so that Trump is met with resistance no matter what it is
00:52:59.080
that he tries to do? Are you surprised to find out that there's a specific billionaire behind it?
00:53:05.480
Of course not. Because every organized thing in politics that looks like it's, you know,
00:53:11.000
the people getting together is never that. There's always a billionaire behind it. And according to
00:53:16.280
Gabe Kaminsky and the DC Examiner, who looks like he got a scoop on this, it's billionaire
00:53:24.680
Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay, who doesn't like Elon Musk. But interestingly,
00:53:33.400
when he was at eBay, that's the company that bought PayPal. Did they buy it from Elon Musk and
00:53:43.480
his partners? So I wonder if they have any bad blood because of some past transaction about PayPal.
00:53:50.120
I've never heard of that, but you never know. Sometimes these things are personal. So apparently
00:53:55.560
this billionaire is maybe behind some of the Mark Elias legal work, might be behind organizing
00:54:01.400
these governors that are going to be anti-Trump. And apparently he also organized the corporate
00:54:10.440
boycotts against X. So you got a billionaire who really, really doesn't like Elon Musk or Trump.
00:54:18.840
All right. So it does, and he owns the Intercept. Isn't the Intercept where Greenwald,
00:54:28.200
is it? The Intercept was founded by Glenn Greenwald, right? And then Greenwald left because they turned
00:54:35.960
into something he didn't want to be associated with. Is that because it was bought by this eBay
00:54:42.920
billionaire guy? So all of these rich people connections, they always have multiple connections,
00:54:52.120
don't they? It's like there's always more than one thing that they've clashed on.
00:54:57.400
So it makes you wonder how much of this is just personal, you know, anti-Elon.
00:55:03.480
Then there was a very strange post I saw from Mark Benioff, founder of Salesforce. Now,
00:55:09.800
you might know Mark Benioff as being very pro-Harris and pro-Democrat, big funder, and
00:55:19.080
also a great guy. So I met him once and I was impressed. What I say about Benioff is he's the real
00:55:27.240
deal. So when he talks about, you know, helping people, but also making money and stuff, he sells
00:55:34.440
that completely like that. That seems completely sincere to me. And that's rare. So he's, he's more
00:55:42.760
like a, almost like a Buddha, but an entrepreneur. He's got a real, a real incredible energy about him
00:55:51.880
that, um, uh, and I've told you this story before. He's, he's one of the first, maybe one of the only
00:55:57.800
people who ever told me to my face, I did a bad job at something. I gave a speech for a Salesforce
00:56:06.120
when I wasn't doing speeches and I wasn't really prepared, but their, their speaker had canceled.
00:56:11.160
So I said, ah, I'll sub in. I wasn't prepared and I did the best I could. But afterwards he told me it
00:56:17.400
was bad. And the funny thing was he was right. And you know, I don't like hearing that I did a bad
00:56:25.240
job. Normally my speeches were quite good, but I would, I gave that the same opinion. Actually,
00:56:30.040
I thought, Oh, that didn't go too well. So the, the fact that he gave me that honest feedback,
00:56:36.680
it kind of made me like him also because it was just honest and it was right. Well, you know,
00:56:42.440
he wasn't lying. I did a bad job. So he's got a comment about Ray Dalio. Ray Dalio is one of these
00:56:49.640
famous investor guys, writes books. People think he's a, he's quite brilliant mind in addition to
00:56:56.760
being a brilliant investor. And he wrote in time magazine, which is owned by Benioff. You need to
00:57:02.440
know that. So he may be boosting the magazine or he may be agreeing with the writer. It's unclear.
00:57:08.680
But Dalio said, quote, it is now clear that Trump will reform government and the country
00:57:14.760
like a corporate raider, engaging in a hostile talk takeover of an inefficient company, making
00:57:20.840
huge reforms by changing people, slashing costs and infusing, infusing new technologies.
00:57:28.680
Now, correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't that a huge endorsement of what Trump is doing?
00:57:36.040
Is there a second way to read that? Because it's not an insult, right? He's not saying it's an insult
00:57:42.120
because you're like a corporate raider. He's saying that he's doing to the government what
00:57:49.240
what needs to be done in an efficient free market, which is come in and fix things. But what is amazing
00:57:55.560
is that it was reposted by Benioff, who owns time magazine, which was it was in the article. And
00:58:04.120
uh, and he just said, amazing Ray Dalio exclamation mark. Is he agreeing?
00:58:13.480
Did that really happen? I don't know what's going on now. I'm confused. Did Mark Benioff,
00:58:20.360
who again is the real deal, did he just back Ray Dalio saying that what Trump's doing
00:58:27.240
is necessary and good and important? And it's like the biggest thing he's doing?
00:58:41.160
Because you know, what would be a good sign of the golden age
00:58:44.840
would be Mark Benioff saying, hey, people, we had an election, we got a winner.
00:58:51.560
And there's some things that this president wants to do that we all want. Is he doing that?
00:58:58.360
Because that would be incredible. You just don't see important people
00:59:04.440
being this directly useful. You know, I mean, Elon Musk is useful, of course.
00:59:10.200
But I hope that's what I'm seeing. Because this would be like a huge thing in my world.
00:59:16.840
That would seem like a huge symbol of the golden age coming together. But we'll see. I don't know.
00:59:25.640
Rand Paul says that Trump using the military for mass deportations would be a huge mistake.
00:59:32.600
Just News is reporting that. I'm going to slightly disagree with that. I will, I will agree that if
00:59:42.760
the citizens see the military on the streets taking the nanny away. Oh, that's a big mistake.
00:59:52.520
If you see the US military, let's say the National Guard, take somebody out of their home who is just a
01:00:00.120
citizen who maybe even has been working. If I ever see that, I'm going to go fucking nuts.
01:00:06.120
Because I don't want to see that. That's not the country I'm living in. Not good. Right. But nobody's
01:00:15.720
going to do that. Why does Rand Paul think any of that's going to happen?
01:00:20.360
My understanding is the following. The military would help transport. So you wouldn't even see
01:00:28.120
them on the streets. They would just be, you know, after the people get rounded up, they might guard
01:00:33.480
them at some facility that there's no public around. So the military maybe helps guard them.
01:00:39.000
Military helps transport them back to the country. And you, the citizen never know that the military
01:00:44.200
was involved unless the press tells you, because they're just staying in their own domain and,
01:00:49.720
you know, letting the ICE and those guys do their job.
01:00:55.400
Would you be okay with that? You'd be okay with that, right? Yeah. As long as they're just like
01:01:01.480
doing a support thing and you don't see them on the streets, definitely don't want to see them
01:01:05.320
knocking on doors. I don't want to see anybody in the real military knocking on doors. Now,
01:01:13.640
I'm going to completely change my opinion. You ready? Unless they're going after the Venezuelan gangs.
01:01:21.240
If there's a Venezuelan gang in an apartment building and they have numbers and they have weapons,
01:01:27.960
bring the military. Please bring the military, all of it. Bring as much as you want. Bring heavy
01:01:34.360
equipment, whatever it takes. I want as much muscle around that place as possible. And I want the public
01:01:44.280
to know that these are not your regular immigrants. This is a criminal gang. But what I don't want
01:01:52.440
is to artificially restrict how much firepower we bring to the fucking gangs, right? If I ever hear
01:02:01.080
that there's a shootout with, let's say, you know, ICE and the gang and somebody in ICE gets shot
01:02:08.040
and I find out that they could have brought the military, but they didn't want to make it look bad.
01:02:13.800
I'm going to be so pissed. I think my head will explode. No, don't put the ICE guys at risk
01:02:19.480
anymore and they have a dangerous enough job. If you need backup and you need it to be the military,
01:02:26.920
bring it all. Bring it all. Bring 10,000 soldiers. I don't care. But no, we got to do what we want to
01:02:37.800
do. And do I think that the public will object if we bring the military in to solve a military problem
01:02:44.040
on our domestically? No, I don't think anybody serious will complain about using the US military
01:02:52.120
to get rid of the fucking gangs. And if they do, I don't care. I'm willing to listen to their
01:02:58.600
complaints, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Just do it anyway. You got to do what you got to do,
01:03:05.400
right? I mean, let's not be fucking idiots, right? The smart way to go is to get rid of the criminals
01:03:11.640
first. If you need the military because it's the gangs, you use the military. Don't be stupid,
01:03:18.520
right? This is supposed to be the common sense government. What we're looking for is more common
01:03:24.120
sense and less wokeism. Common sense says you bring the muscle you need for the job.
01:03:29.800
Bring the muscle that you need for the job. Just don't overdo it. It's simple.
01:03:39.160
So Rand Paul, I agree with him that there's a wrong way to do it. So I like agreeing with Rand Paul
01:03:46.520
because he's a straight shooter and he's smart and you can rely on him to disagree with the powers that be
01:03:52.760
if there's a reason to do it. So I like to be on the same side with him whenever I can.
01:03:57.480
All right. We're hearing more pushback about the idea of Mike Rogers being head of FBI.
01:04:06.040
J. Michael Waller, who's a senior analyst for strategy and author on Intel subjects and stuff,
01:04:16.520
he thinks that Chris Wray, the current FBI head is what he calls the palace eunuch,
01:04:23.000
meaning he doesn't run the bureau, the bureau runs him. And he thinks that Mike Rogers at best
01:04:28.040
would be more of the same, meaning sort of a figurehead, but the FBI would run him.
01:04:32.760
And then he says, he claims, does J. Michael Waller, that Mike Rogers,
01:04:40.200
covered for Hillary on Benghazi, promoted the Russia collusion conspiracy theory,
01:04:45.400
and is part of the surveillance industrial complex. Now, you can't get much more missed unqualified
01:04:51.960
than that. I mean, those are all hard no's for Republicans. I'm a little confused why he's even
01:04:59.400
in the mix. But then here's Glenn Greenwald on the same topic. He said, there's literally no worse
01:05:06.840
appointment possible than choosing Mike Rogers for FBI director or for any government position.
01:05:13.240
He's the single most devoted loyalist to the U.S. security state and all of its multifaceted abuses.
01:05:21.160
It doesn't get worse than Mike Rogers. Now, also, Mike Benz has been weighing in with a similar opinion,
01:05:27.960
that it's an absurd choice. Now, here's my question. Does Trump not know that?
01:05:38.840
By now, of course he knows it. I mean, if he didn't know it on any day one, obviously he knows it now.
01:05:46.200
Why is he still in the mix? Is the whole thing that he's going to tease that it'll be this guy,
01:05:53.400
but then he'll slot in somebody that, you know, maybe like Kash Patel or something? Is he is he really
01:05:59.080
just positioning? Because I don't think so. I mean, it would be kind of a ballsy play to sacrifice this
01:06:08.360
Mike Rogers guy and not really be serious about it. So I don't know about that, but I'm going to if I
01:06:15.960
see that Greenwald and Benz and I don't know Michael Michael Waller, but if I see Greenwald and Benz have
01:06:22.920
the same opinion, I I'm convinced. So remember, I've been telling you that, you know, we used to
01:06:30.920
watch the news and then if the news said something, we thought it was true. But now we know that watching
01:06:36.840
the news, it's not really about the truth. So you have to get your truth somewhere else. I'm finding
01:06:43.880
that the most persuasive elements in the world are podcasters, meaning that that if I hear somebody
01:06:55.720
who is high credibility in general, you know, it could be Elon or Vivek, it could be Mike Benz,
01:07:03.400
it could be Greenwald, it could be Mike Schellenberger, could be, you know, I could name 10 more.
01:07:08.600
Those are the people I trust. So those are the people who changed my opinion in real time. Like,
01:07:16.520
if I have an opinion and I read any one of those names that I just mentioned, and they disagree with
01:07:20.840
me, I almost changed my opinion in real time. Like, I don't even have to go think about it.
01:07:27.160
And that's because they've earned it. That's something they have earned through.
01:07:31.000
They've earned it through pure work, delivering, not falling for hoaxes, covering the important
01:07:42.760
stories, and having good sources and good takes. So I would have to say that I'm solidly against
01:07:51.960
Mike Rogers for FBI, but not based on my own reporting, based on the credibility of the people who are.
01:07:57.080
Nikki Haley took a run at Tulsi Gabbard. Jim's YouTube at CNN is reporting this. So Nikki Haley
01:08:07.080
had what's called a blistering critique of Tulsi Gabbard. And he calls her a sympathizer
01:08:15.320
with, I guess, some variety of Putin and Putin-like people. And she's not qualified, says Nikki Haley,
01:08:24.440
because of her close ties to Russia and, quote, other foreign adversaries.
01:08:29.880
She says, quote, this is not a place for a Russian-Iranian-Syrian-Chinese sympathizer.
01:08:36.120
DNI, that would be the job that Tulsi's up for, director of national intelligence, has to analyze
01:08:42.360
real threats, Haley said on her radio program. Are we comfortable with someone like that at the top of
01:08:48.600
our national intelligence agencies? All right. Here is one of my tips for BS.
01:08:56.280
So write this one down. This is a BS detector tip. If Nikki Haley had said, I'm worried that she is a
01:09:05.160
sympathizer with Russia. I would say to myself, hmm, maybe, maybe that's something I should look into.
01:09:13.080
That's a pretty dire claim. You know, I'd like to see if maybe there's a counter to that. But,
01:09:19.400
you know, if Nikki Haley, who is well-connected and certainly experienced, if she thinks that,
01:09:25.000
if she thinks that, that, that Tulsi having a, what she calls a close tie to Russia is bad,
01:09:31.560
I'll take that seriously. Oh, wait, but also the Iranians. Oh, wait, but also the Syrians. Oh,
01:09:39.240
wait, but also the Chinese. And now you lost me. Do I believe that Tulsi is a sympathizer with
01:09:47.720
Russia, Iran, Syria, and China? Seriously? I mean, seriously. Does that sound like anything you
01:09:56.200
should take seriously? Literally nobody has that opinion. These are four different countries with
01:10:02.840
four different challenges. It's kind of absurd. And so this is sort of the laundry list tip. When you see
01:10:14.760
a laundry list of problems, it means that they don't have one problem that they can rely on to
01:10:19.960
make their case. They're hoping that you look at the list and you go, oh, well, I'm not sure she's
01:10:25.000
a Russian asset, but I didn't know about this Iranian thing. Or now the Syrian thing is just
01:10:30.840
more of the Russian thing. And I don't believe that. And she doesn't really have any connections
01:10:34.680
to China and China, but, but wait a minute, what if the Iranian thing is real? So that's how the,
01:10:40.360
that's how the laundry list persuasion works. It relies on you to say, well, a few of these aren't
01:10:47.000
true, but if, if even one of these is true, that would be disqualifying. Probably none of them are true.
01:10:55.400
Right. And when you use words like sympathizer, what are you trying to do?
01:10:59.960
Well, that leads me to my next point. Do you think that Democrats have learned their lesson
01:11:12.520
about what messages they can sell, what they can't? Do you remember, you've seen a bunch of
01:11:19.320
Democrats say recently, and they all act like they're the first ones who thought of it. Hey,
01:11:24.120
I don't know if anybody's thought of this, but maybe we should have concentrated on the price of eggs.
01:11:30.600
And then you'll see somebody else say it like it was also the first time they thought of it. Hey,
01:11:34.680
you know what? I'm starting to think we should have concentrated on the price of eggs.
01:11:41.400
But instead they, they tried to sell Trump as Hitler and a fascist. And the public just said,
01:11:48.360
ah, seriously, we just keep hearing these words. They don't mean anything anymore.
01:11:55.960
But did they learn their lesson? So are we now seeing that the, that the Democrats are solidly
01:12:03.560
looking at the price of eggs? Nope. They're calling various Trump people sympathizers that are
01:12:12.200
stealing democracy. Um, maybe the Gates nomination is about humiliating, humiliating Republicans because
01:12:18.760
Trump is, uh, that kind of a personality, uh, that broad-based tariffs, which of course will not be used.
01:12:25.240
Uh, that's just a threat that, uh, you got to worry about those broad-based tariffs. Uh, he's going
01:12:29.960
to deport 20 million people. That's never going to happen. And, uh, he's going to use the military
01:12:34.760
to deport him, which means the military will be knocking on your doors. None of these are true.
01:12:38.440
These are the biggest complaints about Trump. None of these are true.
01:12:45.800
They just went right back to where they were. Now, in this case, you've got two Republicans,
01:12:50.920
Nikki Haley, and in the case of Rand Paul in the military use of the deportations,
01:12:56.040
you've got even a couple of Republicans who are veering into the, not the price of eggs territory.
01:13:03.000
So let me try to explain it in a way that every Democrat can understand it. Are you ready?
01:13:12.840
There's the price of eggs, very important. Now here, eggs are a stand-in for things you need to buy
01:13:20.200
to stay alive. Eggs, the price of eggs, very important. Here's what's not important.
01:13:25.720
Um, sympathizers, stealing democracy, humiliating Republicans, broad-based tariffs that will never
01:13:32.600
happen, 20 million deportations that will never happen, the military knocking on doors to get rid of
01:13:38.760
your, your nanny who's worked for you for 10 years, never happened.
01:13:45.560
All the Trump critics went right back to where they were because he's not doing anything wrong.
01:13:53.080
If they had real things to bitch about, do you think that they would be coming up with this stuff?
01:13:58.040
No, this is the sign of the emptiness. This is total emptiness. Maybe if I make up a word I saw,
01:14:07.000
I could tie it to him with a laundry list and I, you know, I'll do some mind reading. Oh yeah,
01:14:14.680
yeah, I got it. Now I can see his real intentions. Oh yeah, yeah. He's really,
01:14:19.800
he's not just trying to get a, an attorney general that will be loyal and get the job done. He wants
01:14:25.880
to humiliate the Republicans who are against him. It's all batshit crazy. They're not even real
01:14:35.080
things. Nobody's stealing your democracy. There's no dictators happen. There's no fascism happening.
01:14:41.240
There's no humiliating Republicans. There's just shit he wants. And he has a good reason for wanting
01:14:46.760
it. A really good reason to get a loyal FBI guy on his side. A really, really, really good reason.
01:14:53.240
That's not, and though, so you're, it's almost the imaginary world versus the real one.
01:14:59.080
It's just this complete imaginary, almost theatrical fictional world of Trump.
01:15:07.240
Here's the funniest story of the day. You know, David Hogg, he's a anti-gun activist. He was one
01:15:14.360
of the ones who survived the famous school shooting, whose name I don't remember, but you do. Breitbart is
01:15:21.160
reporting that David Hogg met with, quote, researchers and activists, and they're trying to figure out how
01:15:28.600
to lure more young men back to the Democrat party. And Breitbart was asking, what advice would you give
01:15:37.640
them? I feel like this is Parkland. Yes, the Parkland school shooting. So David Hogg was a survivor that
01:15:46.920
became a very effective activist. I believe he went to Harvard and now he's at Harvard. So he's a smart
01:15:54.040
guy. Anyway, so he's going to try to figure out how do we figure out how to lure the young men back to
01:16:01.560
the Democrat party? Well, anybody got any advice? Anybody got any ideas how to lure the anti-gun guy back to
01:16:16.280
the Democrat party? All right, I've got some advice. It has to do with the definition of a man.
01:16:26.200
Now, everybody has their own definition. You know, what's a man? Like a man does this and a man does this.
01:16:33.800
Here's my definition. A man is what you get when you stop telling people how to be.
01:16:39.080
Yeah, let that sink in. A man is what you get when you stop telling people how to act.
01:16:52.840
I just let that sink in for a little bit. A man is what's left when you stop telling people how to act.
01:17:07.800
Yeah, just think about that one for a while. And what do the Democrats do most? They tell you how
01:17:13.080
to act. We're going to tell you how to talk. No, you can't talk like that. We're going to put a
01:17:18.280
vaccination in your arm. Now, Trump is part of that as well, of course. We're going to tell you that
01:17:26.520
you should be a Democrat even though we're offering you nothing. We're going to take away your guns,
01:17:35.320
your free speech, and we're going to take away your children. Yeah, your children won't be yours
01:17:45.320
anymore. If the school says they should be taken away from you to be transitioned, we're going to do
01:17:49.960
that. So if you want men to come back, how about letting them be men? So if the only people who can
01:17:59.240
be Democrats are people who are willing to cosplay as women, then that's what you're going to get.
01:18:07.240
In my opinion, the biological males who identify as Democrat are just cosplaying as women
01:18:13.560
because they found it easier. And the Republicans are mostly people who said,
01:18:19.640
you know what? How about I am a man and you're not going to take all my shit? And we're done with that.
01:18:29.800
That's a man. The man says, no, you're not going to take all my shit. You're not going to take my free
01:18:35.080
speech. You're not going to take my gun. You're not going to take my child. You're not going to take all
01:18:40.760
my taxes, tax money. You're not going to take my job and ship it to another country. You're not going
01:18:47.240
to take my adult child and ship them to some dumb fuck war that we shouldn't be in. How about you just
01:18:53.000
leave me the fuck alone? And then I'll show you a man. So that's my advice, David Hogg.
01:19:00.840
Leave men alone. Don't try to take all the shit. Then you'll find the men. They will be what's left.
01:19:13.720
Well, Joe Biden is apparently doing something called Trump-proofing his Hallmark Chips Act. Now,
01:19:20.680
that was where he's going to spend billions of dollars to bring chip building to America shores so
01:19:27.160
that we're not vulnerable to Taiwan specifically. So Taiwan and their biggest chip company is going to
01:19:35.320
build chip makers in the US. And that's part of a big deal there. And I guess the Trump-proofing it
01:19:42.120
part is, I don't know, just making sure we've committed to the expense. But why is this Trump-proofing?
01:19:48.120
What am I missing? Does Trump not want highly important security military chips to be made in
01:20:00.360
the United States? Was Trump going to cancel this? Do you think Elon Musk was going to say,
01:20:07.800
nah, let's make all of our most important stuff in Taiwan? Who exactly was going to be against this?
01:20:16.040
This is one of the very best things that the Biden administration did. I remember being completely
01:20:22.360
on board when I first started. It's like, ah, yes, yes, yes. Joe Biden, that is correct. You should
01:20:28.680
incentivize the chip makers to come back to the US, even if it's really expensive, because this one's
01:20:35.560
military. We can't really survive if we have to depend on Taiwan forever for chips.
01:20:41.800
So I'm just going to give a pat on the back. Now, we have to be careful about waste. Obviously,
01:20:49.720
there could be a bad way and a good way to do it. And maybe there's some bumps in the road.
01:20:54.440
But no, this is exactly what we should be doing. I can't criticize Biden for that.
01:20:59.000
So apparently enough votes have been counted that Trump did not get a majority of the votes.
01:21:04.040
He got more. Trump got more votes than Kamala Harris. But I guess when you throw in the third
01:21:09.800
party people, both of them were below 50 percent. So Trump did not. He got really close. But he did
01:21:17.800
not win a majority of the voters. He won. He won the popular vote. So it's still fair to say he won the
01:21:25.800
popular vote. But he didn't get over 50 percent. And the Democrats are just going to ride that horse
01:21:32.360
forever. Well, you know, it was a tie, basically. That's what they're going to say. And they're not
01:21:48.760
As you know, Biden has approved the use of the more dangerous long, long range missiles to be
01:21:56.760
used inside Russia, which is the red line that Russia said, don't ever do that. If you do that,
01:22:01.480
we're at a war with the United States. And so apparently we're at war with Russia.
01:22:05.400
But the part that bothers me the most is that the name of the missiles is ATACMS.
01:22:15.480
Really? Now, I get that they probably tried to make the, so it's an acronym, you know,
01:22:22.440
the A-T-A-E-C-M-S or something. I get it that it's an acronym and maybe they put some work into
01:22:29.960
making it sound clever. But don't make your weapons sound cartoony. Don't make your instruments of
01:22:39.160
death, like kind of lighthearted. I don't need that. No, I don't need them to be ATACMS.
01:22:48.040
Oh, and then all the people in the news are saying it. It's like, ah, they sent the ATACMS.
01:22:52.680
It makes them sound like they understand something military. Well, we'll use the ATACMS. But if the ATACMS
01:23:00.760
don't work, we'll use the SHUTMS. And then if that doesn't work, we'll use the BOMMS.
01:23:08.360
You just change the name. That's all I'm asking. I'm going to say again that I believe that the risk
01:23:15.240
of nuclear war with Russia is exactly zero because they're not crazy. They don't absolutely have to
01:23:22.600
create a nuclear war. There's no rule or law or, you know, there's no law of physics that says they
01:23:30.040
have to do it. They don't want it. And all they have to do is wait a few weeks and Trump will come
01:23:35.800
in and then they'll be talking and then they'll fix it up. So literally we've never had less risk
01:23:43.480
of nuclear war. Now your news wants to tell you you do have a risk because then you're going to
01:23:48.120
click on it. But no, this is the lowest risk you'll ever have in your life of nuclear war
01:23:53.240
with Russia. Because everything, every single signal says, oh, we have rational people in charge now.
01:24:01.000
Let's talk. And, you know, Trump's the big dog. And when the big dog gets off the porch,
01:24:07.800
the other dogs say, oh, big dogs here. Let's act differently.
01:24:13.640
Meanwhile, I do think that Putin might destroy much of Kyiv just to position himself for negotiations.
01:24:23.960
So that's a problem. Meanwhile, in Israel, the, not in Israel, but the International Criminal Court,
01:24:34.600
which is not in Israel, issued arrest warrants for the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former
01:24:42.040
Defense Minister Gallant, alleging that they committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during the
01:24:48.440
offensive in Gaza. Now, if it makes you feel any better, the International Criminal Court also
01:24:57.400
went after the October 7th people. So they don't love Hamas, but they're not loving Israel's response.
01:25:07.720
Does that make any difference in the world? Because I don't think it does.
01:25:11.960
But does it make it dangerous or impossible for Netanyahu to travel anywhere except the United States?
01:25:19.560
So the United States, of course, is not going to buy into this.
01:25:22.760
But what if Netanyahu just took a trip to Denmark? What happens if he just goes to France?
01:25:42.520
Somebody's saying that Jussie Smollett's conviction was overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court.
01:25:50.520
Is that real? Did something happen with Jussie Smollett?
01:25:54.520
I'm going to say not real unless I see a confirmation of that.
01:26:01.960
Yeah. So I don't know what's going to happen with that, but
01:26:14.360
And by the way, I'm not saying that any, I'm not saying that they're international criminals.
01:26:18.680
As you know, my view on Israel is that I don't support the Israeli government's position on any of this.
01:26:29.560
And as an observer, I think everybody would say,
01:26:33.160
pretty much anybody would act the same way in that situation.
01:26:36.440
So you don't have to approve it or not approve it.
01:26:38.920
They're not listening to me. They don't care what my opinion is.
01:26:54.760
So I guess they know they don't have to stick around too long.
01:27:04.760
That Jussie Smollett's conviction was overturned.
01:27:12.600
Ukraine cannot fire the missile without direct involvement of the US or other nations.
01:27:16.760
Well, yes, it's possible that the whole who's firing those attack of missiles,
01:27:27.480
Because let's say America makes the missile, but there's nobody in Ukraine that knows how to program it to fire properly.
01:27:44.520
But somebody still has to approve it and push the button.
01:27:47.960
Do you think the NATO person pushes the button and approves it?
01:27:52.520
I say the Ukrainian military pushes the button.
01:27:58.840
Does it matter that the Americans programmed it?
01:28:02.600
It feels like the person who pushes the button is the one who's firing it.
01:28:06.600
Because building it in the first place is more involvement than programming it.
01:28:13.560
Programming it is just another minor thing you do to make it a functional missile.
01:28:18.840
But you don't blame the person who made the missile and made it programmable.
01:28:25.480
So I'm not entirely sure that they can't fire it without the US or NATO.
01:28:35.400
NATO involvement might be just to say, here it is all set up.
01:28:43.320
I don't think Putin's going to launch a nuclear weapon over a technicality like that.
01:28:49.880
I think you'd be far more likely to say, if you fire one more of these attackums,
01:28:54.280
I'm going to level Kiev with traditional weapons.
01:28:59.960
Now, if he did that, I hate to give him advice,
01:29:02.520
but you probably should do that in any way if he wants a good deal.
01:29:12.680
he probably will turn up the pressure with conventional weapons as high as he can turn it up.
01:29:19.880
Trump thinks the money should go to American corporations.
01:29:34.360
I'm going to go talk to the locals, people privately.
01:29:42.120
Thanks for joining on YouTube and Rumble and X.