Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 11, 2024


Episode 2686 CWSA 12⧸11⧸24


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 26 minutes

Words per Minute

144.78

Word Count

12,549

Sentence Count

901

Misogynist Sentences

24

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we talk about the dopamine hit of the day: the thing that makes everything better. Plus, some science updates that will make you think twice before you drink your morning cup of joe.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 folks. Here we go.
00:00:10.160 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called
00:00:22.000 Coffee with Scott Adams, and I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time. But if you'd
00:00:29.020 like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their
00:00:33.520 tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tank or
00:00:37.700 a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with
00:00:41.680 your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the
00:00:46.500 dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous
00:00:50.960 sip of that. Wait, what is that? What am I seeing? Oh, no. Damn it. A UAP landed in my
00:01:06.120 coffee. No, really. Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen. No,
00:01:12.360 seriously, there's a UAP in here. Advanced civilization is doing things that are defying
00:01:17.960 physics. I swear, just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not happening. Oh,
00:01:24.580 I could show it to you, but there are reasons. Totally.
00:01:33.440 All right. Let's get serious. Now, here's some science updates. You're not going to believe
00:01:41.500 it. This is unbelievable. Did you know that physically fit people tend to be more creative?
00:01:47.960 That's right. Turns out that, I don't know if I've ever told you this before, but have you ever
00:01:56.920 heard that your body and your brain are the same thing? Yes, your body is your brain. If you do your
00:02:04.460 exercise and do your physical fitness, yes, you'll be more creative. Yes, you'll have less
00:02:09.580 dementia. Yes, you'll be have a higher IQ. Stop doing studies. We all know it's true now.
00:02:17.860 Well, there's another study from Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
00:02:23.920 They say that people who have a positive attitude, you know, a mindset that things will work out,
00:02:29.540 are built differently. And that a positive attitude, what the researchers call the growth mindset,
00:02:37.080 or belief in growth, it's associated with both higher willpower and passion. Huh? So let's see if
00:02:45.980 I understand the science. So if you have a growth mindset that's associated with being an optimist,
00:02:55.640 here's another way to interpret that. A growth mindset is an optimist. It's not associated with it.
00:03:05.920 It's what it is. There's no difference between optimism and a growth mindset, is there? The only
00:03:16.940 reason you would have a growth mindset is you thought it would work. Do any of you have plans
00:03:22.760 that you know won't work? No. You make plans based on what you think will work. So optimism is a growth
00:03:31.220 mindset. Because your optimism isn't going to be about other people. It's going to be about yourself.
00:03:36.020 Of course you're optimistic if you have a growth mindset. One doesn't cause the other. They're just
00:03:41.880 the same freaking thing. All right, science. Science. I spit on science. No, I love science. I'm kidding.
00:03:52.140 Now, you won't believe this. There's another study, according to SciPost, that physical activity
00:03:59.640 boosts IQ in kids and teens. We know. We know. Physical activity. Your brain, your body. It's all the
00:04:06.840 same thing. Take care of your body. Your brain will be better. Yes. Here's another one from SciPost.
00:04:13.800 Religious service attendance linked to lower dementia risk in black older adults.
00:04:18.320 Oh, my. Why? Why must I be the one who speaks out against science? Science. Do you think that
00:04:32.580 this is a causation? Do you think if you say, hey, people, if you go to church more, you're going to
00:04:38.920 get less dementia? No. How about people who are high-functioning do all the high-functioning
00:04:47.300 things that people with high-functioning do? And in the United States, that includes going to church
00:04:52.880 because you can wake up in the morning. You're disciplined enough. Your life is together enough
00:04:59.260 that you can make it to church. No, it's just association. It's not causation. Sorry,
00:05:07.640 backward science. Meanwhile, according to Tom Perkins and The Guardian, China just invented
00:05:14.020 something that will suck up almost 100% of microplastics, and it's cheap and scalable.
00:05:20.860 So they've got some kind of sponge made of cotton and squid bone.
00:05:28.280 You know how I always say the scientists, they could have come to me. They didn't need to spend the
00:05:34.640 money. Well, here's an exception, because if they had come to me and they said, Scott, we've got a lot of
00:05:40.760 microplastics. We're looking for some way to absorb them. What are the odds I would have said,
00:05:46.560 okay, okay, what have you tried so far? Have you tried squid bone and cotton? I probably wouldn't
00:05:54.740 have said that. So this would be an example of science that was worth doing. You didn't need to
00:05:59.980 just ask me. But yes, if you've got access to squid bones, which I assume are squished up and mixed with
00:06:10.420 the cotton, it'll absorb 99.9% of microplastics and water samples. My God. Imagine if that worked,
00:06:19.280 and apparently it's reusable and scalable and all that. But how scalable could it be? How many squid
00:06:26.000 bones do you have? If you tried to get all the microplastics out of the ocean, wouldn't you run
00:06:32.840 out of squids really fast? Seems like he'd be squidless before long. Yep. All right. Reuters did a fact
00:06:44.780 check, some valuable fact check. Now, Reuters, as you know, unlike some of these fake news organizations,
00:06:51.440 you've heard of them, fake news. Well, Reuters is real news. So when Reuters does a story,
00:06:59.680 you can pretty much bank on it being right down the middle and logical and well-researched.
00:07:07.800 That's Reuters. Good reputation. Let's see what Reuters is up to today.
00:07:11.560 Oh, Reuters did a fact check. There was a story that looked like it was a CNN headline, but Reuters says
00:07:20.420 it's fake. And the fake story said that Elon Musk had melted down the Statue of Liberty.
00:07:29.660 But Reuters wants you to know that that didn't happen. Or did it? Because Elon Musk responded
00:07:37.520 on an ex post. He said, no, I definitely melted it down 1,000%. So now I don't know. Did he?
00:07:46.440 I don't know. We got the CNN headline that says he did melt it down. And then Reuters says he didn't.
00:07:55.940 So that's a tie. But then Elon says he totally melted it down. So that's two to one that says he melted
00:08:02.380 it down. I don't know. I'm going to go with the Statue of Liberty no longer exists. And it was melted
00:08:08.900 down. But that's not all. Reuters also fact checked a well-known news site called the Babylonians.
00:08:16.420 Babylon Bee. That had a story that said that Alua Akbar has replaced Cheerio mate as UK greeting.
00:08:26.680 And Reuters wants you to know that didn't happen. They did not replace Cheerio mate with Alua Akbar.
00:08:35.660 That did not happen. That was fake news. Yeah. And so it turns out the Babylon Bee
00:08:40.420 doesn't get every story completely accurate. I don't know. I'm going to keep an eye on those guys
00:08:48.020 because I want to make sure they're, you know, playing ball the way they should. So we'll keep
00:08:55.120 an eye on them. Speaking of Babylon Bee, it makes me think of The Onion, which makes me think of their
00:09:01.380 effort to buy InfoWars. So there was some group backing the publication, The Onion, which I didn't
00:09:11.180 even know existed anymore. It's under new management, I guess. And they made an offer to buy InfoWars
00:09:18.480 because of the bankruptcy judgments. And that got turned down by the judge. I guess the reason was
00:09:26.700 the people who organized the auction for it didn't do enough work and maybe they left some money on the
00:09:34.000 table. So the judge said, go back and try harder to get more money for the InfoWars assets.
00:09:39.760 Now, did you know how much that was going for? I was trying to guess, how much are you going to pay
00:09:48.200 for InfoWars? And what exactly do you get? Do you get to take over the rent for the studio?
00:09:55.480 Like, what exactly do you get? Do you get the cameras and the lighting equipment and a desk?
00:10:01.640 If you don't get Alex Jones, what is InfoWars? Is it just the studio and the names of my P? I don't know.
00:10:09.760 So the price for InfoWars was somewhere between roughly $1 to $4 million. So the bid that
00:10:25.140 The Onion made was on the low end. They think they could get closer to the $3 million plus.
00:10:32.480 But it occurred to me that I could buy InfoWars. I didn't know it was affordable.
00:10:39.760 I had no idea. But technically, I mean, I could afford it. So should I buy InfoWars?
00:10:47.700 What would I do with it? Is there anything you can do with it?
00:10:51.740 If I bought it and just said, hey, Alex, go do your thing. Is there any way I could make my money back?
00:11:02.740 So could I buy it and then just hire Alex as my employee and just keep some of it?
00:11:10.240 I don't know. I probably don't have enough energy to pull off that transaction. But if there's anybody out there and you wondered what would it cost to own InfoWars?
00:11:22.520 Because, you know, if you're a billionaire and you just want to mess with the powers that be, because the powers that be wanted Alex Jones to be out of business, it would be just a wonderful FU if you had a billion dollars.
00:11:37.500 You know, I'm not a billionaire. But I mean, for me, it would be serious money. So it's not like that's not pocket change.
00:11:44.780 I'm doing OK, but that's not pocket change. Anyway, so make an offer through three million, four million. You might own it.
00:11:59.860 You remember Act Blue? So Act Blue is that big organization that allegedly is accumulating small donations for the Democrat Party.
00:12:09.640 But they were they were they were accused of taking money from foreign entities that were trying to influence the elections and using them as a essentially a money laundering operation for their foreign influence.
00:12:22.520 That's the charge. John Solomon of Just the News is reporting on that.
00:12:27.340 But apparently the new news about that is that the platform did not block foreign gift cards until this fall.
00:12:34.700 So apparently you could donate using a foreign gift card so that nobody would know who the real donator is, I guess.
00:12:46.180 And it would sort of conceal what's going on. And you could have a lot of foreign influence that way.
00:12:52.260 So apparently they've fixed this so that it can't do that anymore. But it was.
00:12:58.000 So foreign money laundering appears to be confirmed.
00:13:04.700 It appears to be confirmed because if they ever had the ability, which they do confirm, to accept these foreign prepaid gift cards and we know they were doing it.
00:13:16.380 We don't know how much influence.
00:13:18.380 We don't know how much influence it was because we don't have a dollar amount for the cumulative total, but it can't be it can't be nothing.
00:13:27.260 Or else it wouldn't be a story.
00:13:29.520 So the story is kind of empty without knowing what dollar amount they think could have been this foreign money laundering.
00:13:35.140 But if I ever hear that number, I'll tell you if it makes a difference.
00:13:37.760 Meanwhile, over at Reclaim the Net, the reporting on Meta is tweaking their program for censorship.
00:13:48.520 I'll call it censorship, but really it's getting rid of people who violated the terms of service.
00:13:53.700 And instead of being kind of one strike your round, there's going to be some kind of a probation period where Meta tries to educate you on why you were temporarily banned.
00:14:09.540 And then you can work your way back into their good graces.
00:14:12.660 That's pretty good.
00:14:13.540 So I don't know if this is a good idea or a bad idea.
00:14:16.880 And it probably depends how it's implemented.
00:14:18.740 But when I see Meta doing something that, at least on paper, is exactly what we want, because we want people to have free speech.
00:14:27.580 But if you have free speech, you know you're also sometimes going to violate the terms of service and maybe not even know it.
00:14:34.660 You might not even know you did it.
00:14:36.460 So isn't it better for everybody and for free speech if Meta says, all right, we don't know if that was intentional.
00:14:43.960 Here's a warning.
00:14:45.580 Maybe a little limitation on your account temporarily.
00:14:48.440 But here's some education.
00:14:49.680 Did you know this?
00:14:51.320 Don't do it again.
00:14:52.500 I like that.
00:14:53.840 Feels like progress.
00:14:57.720 Meanwhile, apparently one of the hottest trends, at least for China, on the consumer Internet, is these short video dramas.
00:15:07.320 So apparently creators are making one to two minute episodes for something that might be over an hour.
00:15:17.060 So you see only one to two minutes for each episode.
00:15:20.140 And it's designed for vertical viewing on phones.
00:15:23.020 So it's not movie format.
00:15:24.780 It's that up and down selfie kind of format.
00:15:27.860 And apparently the traffic and the money on that has surpassed movie box office.
00:15:36.900 So it's already like I'm hearing about it today.
00:15:41.000 It's already bigger than movies.
00:15:42.580 At least for China.
00:15:47.120 And to them I say, that makes perfect sense.
00:15:52.660 The thing I worry about is the shortening attention spans that the phones are causing.
00:15:58.420 And I know for myself, it is literally just not possible for me to watch a long form movie.
00:16:06.580 And I've said it many times, but I keep thinking I keep thinking I'm exaggerating when I say it.
00:16:12.060 And that, you know, 10 minutes from now I'll be watching a three hour movie and enjoying it thoroughly.
00:16:18.060 But I don't think so.
00:16:19.780 I'm starting to think that there's no place in my life and maybe no place in your life for a long form movie.
00:16:27.040 Like, the trouble with a long form movie is they have to do the entire first act has to be bad news for the hero.
00:16:36.160 So the hero has some purpose.
00:16:38.860 So I don't want to watch, you know, 30 minutes of terrible things.
00:16:42.320 Oh, my family was wiped out by the bad guys or whatever.
00:16:45.120 And then at the end of the movie, massive people are getting killed, including the favored, you know, like the co-star who you really love.
00:16:55.320 But I guess they didn't make it to the end of the movie.
00:16:58.100 And then and then I hate movies where thousands of people have been killed, including, you know, a dozen people that are very close to the hero.
00:17:09.060 And then the hero is still happy at the end.
00:17:12.140 How can you be happy after like 12 of your friends just got wiped out, you know, even though you won?
00:17:16.320 Like, so everything about movies is sad and archaic and doesn't fit in the modern world.
00:17:23.120 So maybe these new short episodes would work.
00:17:27.460 It made me think, I wonder if I could do one.
00:17:31.020 I have to look into this.
00:17:32.420 But it seems to me it wouldn't be that hard to get some friends together and create a drama that's one to two minutes where all you do is agree what you're going to act out for a minute.
00:17:45.140 And then you just sort of do it with your friends.
00:17:47.740 But you make it look like, you know, something bigger has happened.
00:17:51.960 Could be cool.
00:17:53.480 Meanwhile, Kimberly Guilfoyle has been tapped to be the ambassador to Greece.
00:17:58.520 And if you're not up on the news, you might say to yourself, huh, what will Don Jr. think about that?
00:18:07.840 But it turns out that they are not a couple anymore.
00:18:10.880 Don Jr. has found another woman.
00:18:15.300 I'll just leave it at that.
00:18:16.660 So he's he's connected now with some other young, beautiful woman.
00:18:21.920 And I feel like there must have been a lot of interesting negotiations behind this.
00:18:31.160 The first thing I would note is that the breakup didn't happen, I think, until after it was obvious that Newsom would not be the candidate.
00:18:43.120 Did you notice that?
00:18:44.440 Because if Newsom had been the candidate, Kimberly Guilfoyle would have been so valuable to the Trump family.
00:18:53.580 They probably would have told Don Jr., you know, if you're thinking about breaking up, maybe just hold off a little bit longer.
00:19:01.260 Because wouldn't it be good to have Newsom's ex on your team?
00:19:06.120 You know, for all the like inside psychological stuff, but probably a coincidence.
00:19:13.820 But at the same time, that that asset was no longer necessary because Newsom's not running for office for at least this time.
00:19:22.400 Then Kimberly Guilfoyle has put all of this, let's say, time and effort and blood and sweat and tears into the Trump operation.
00:19:33.000 And reasonably could expect that she would have some home there.
00:19:39.560 But then she can't really hang around locally because her boyfriend's got a new girlfriend and that's going to be awkward.
00:19:46.480 So this looks perfect.
00:19:48.160 If it works out for her lifestyle wise.
00:19:51.940 Great.
00:19:53.360 I mean, she might actually love being an ambassador to Greece.
00:19:56.780 Doesn't sound like a bad job, actually.
00:19:59.040 So I wish the best to all of them.
00:20:03.000 Ontario, the wait is over.
00:20:05.560 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.
00:20:08.420 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.
00:20:16.020 Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple.
00:20:20.480 And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.
00:20:26.500 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino.
00:20:36.180 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action.
00:20:42.680 All from the comfort of your own devices.
00:20:44.480 Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino?
00:20:50.160 Gambling problem?
00:20:51.080 Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600.
00:20:55.380 19 and over.
00:20:56.300 Physically present in Ontario.
00:20:57.680 Eligibility restrictions apply.
00:20:59.280 See goldennuggetcasino.com for details.
00:21:01.760 Please play responsibly.
00:21:02.820 Meanwhile, the American Tori Reform Foundation ranked New York City as the second worst judicial hellhole, especially for lawsuits.
00:21:15.760 So I guess the laws and the process there are really friendly for people who want to abuse the system.
00:21:22.360 So New York City, judicial hellhole.
00:21:24.780 I didn't see who came in second or who came in first.
00:21:29.040 But New York second.
00:21:30.340 So I would say, again, New York City and really New York State, I wouldn't build a business there.
00:21:40.580 I feel like that would just be insane.
00:21:43.540 The laws are so unfriendly that it just seems like the logical thing is to stay in New York.
00:21:51.220 Anyway, Mark Andreessen continues to be interesting in his, I would say, his new role as more of a public.
00:22:00.340 Commenter.
00:22:01.800 And we need more of him because his public comments are unusually good.
00:22:06.820 He is unusually smart and, you know, no BS.
00:22:12.740 So he was, I think he was talking to Barry Weiss.
00:22:15.600 And he was saying that all, every government becomes an oligarch.
00:22:20.900 Oligarchy.
00:22:21.540 Every government becomes an oligarchy.
00:22:25.360 Dictators, oligarchies.
00:22:27.700 So-called democratic countries, republics, oligarchies.
00:22:32.500 And he says the simple reason is that the elites, because they're a smaller group and they're smaller and powerful and capable, that the elites tend to be good at organizing so that they can keep their power.
00:22:45.580 Whereas the masses are bad at organizing.
00:22:48.540 Because the elites might have more in common, which is, you're rich, I'm rich, let's try to keep this going.
00:22:55.260 So as long as the elites want to stay in power and stay rich, they can more easily organize.
00:23:00.720 Whereas the masses are like, hey, you're black and I'm a lesbian.
00:23:05.520 Can we be on the same team?
00:23:06.740 I don't know.
00:23:07.640 I don't know.
00:23:09.940 So that makes sense.
00:23:11.000 And I would agree with that, that every government, in reality, is an oligarch.
00:23:17.500 But I would add a little wrinkle to that.
00:23:19.680 So this is one of the smartest reframes that I ever heard in terms of the United States, is that we're more like Game of Thrones, meaning that the oligarchs are not all on the same side.
00:23:35.480 So there's an oligarch group over here that has a lot of interest in one topic.
00:23:41.740 There's another oligarch group over here that really cares about another topic, but still oligarchs.
00:23:48.260 It's just that our oligarchs tend to be divided into smaller teams that care about things more than other things.
00:23:57.720 So there's that.
00:23:59.200 But I would add to the idea that every government becomes an oligarchy, I would add my thing, which is every government becomes a brainwasher.
00:24:11.420 Every government becomes a brainwasher because they have to.
00:24:16.660 So there's no other model that works.
00:24:19.520 It doesn't matter if you're a dictator, brainwashing your citizens.
00:24:23.720 It doesn't matter if you're a democracy or a republic, brainwashing.
00:24:27.720 You really can't not do it.
00:24:29.960 The moment you let the news do what the news wanted to do, who would be running the country?
00:24:37.160 The news.
00:24:38.400 The news would.
00:24:39.160 And then there would be somebody who became the powerful news person, and they would effectively run the country.
00:24:45.280 So if you're in a government, it doesn't matter what kind of government, how you got there, dictator or actually a fair vote, once you get there, you can't let the news run the country.
00:24:58.620 Because what if the news said, let's say you get elected tomorrow, totally legal election, you're completely legitimate.
00:25:06.360 But the news decides they want to get their own person in there, you know, somebody who's important in the news business.
00:25:11.580 So they just start some fake news and say that you're on a Russia collusion or something.
00:25:18.220 And the next thing you know, people vote you out.
00:25:23.180 So if you're in any kind of a democratic republic or even dictator, if you don't control your news so that the news is a reflection of what the people in charge want it to be, you will not be in charge.
00:25:40.280 There is no other way.
00:25:41.520 Because otherwise you would agree that the news tells people what to think, and if the news tells people to think that the government is bad and everything isn't working, the government will fall.
00:25:54.420 So brainwashing is not optional.
00:25:57.280 You want it to be, but how much you want it to be won't change the fact it's not optional.
00:26:02.760 It really isn't.
00:26:04.320 I hate it, but it's not optional.
00:26:06.360 So let's talk about the health care hitman, they call him.
00:26:14.580 So they caught him, as you know, at a McDonald's.
00:26:18.900 And one of the mysteries is why did he seem like he was such a law-abiding, nice kid with a great future, and then he turned into some kind of domestic terrorist?
00:26:29.980 Like, how does that happen?
00:26:32.080 But, and I saw one lawyer, Lawyer Lee, at least that's the name she goes by on X, Lawyer Lee said,
00:26:40.200 I've been a lawyer for 30 years, there's a lot more to the Luigi Mangioli story than we've been told.
00:26:46.840 I'm highly concerned about his claim that evidence was planted on him.
00:26:52.040 Well, I can see why you'd be suspicious about that.
00:26:56.060 Because when you hear what was planted on him, it almost sounds like a comedy.
00:27:02.460 Well, he still had the murder weapon in his pocket.
00:27:08.000 What?
00:27:09.100 What, days later?
00:27:10.780 You've got the murder weapon in your pocket when you get caught at McDonald's?
00:27:15.220 And he had the fake IDs that he used to commit the crime.
00:27:21.420 He had all the fake IDs on him.
00:27:23.600 What?
00:27:24.440 And then he had the actual face mask that he wore during the crime, or one that looked like it, at least.
00:27:30.520 And you think to yourself, what the heck's going on here?
00:27:34.260 All right, so, yeah, I'm seeing in the comments that there's an old video of the now deceased CEO saying that they had good connections with Nancy Pelosi,
00:27:50.480 so that their business was at least connected to the powers that be, so they were in good shape for that.
00:27:57.000 I don't know if that was as big a conspiracy as you think.
00:28:00.400 He was just saying that he's got friends in the government that's going to help him.
00:28:04.940 So, I don't know.
00:28:07.000 We'll see.
00:28:08.460 So, it could be that Nancy Pelosi made some insider trading money off it somehow.
00:28:13.240 I don't know.
00:28:15.000 I'm just speculating.
00:28:16.180 So, we don't know what that Pelosi reference meant, if it was important or if it wasn't.
00:28:22.440 So, 4chan solved the case.
00:28:29.800 So, here's what I think.
00:28:31.360 I think that the story about his back injury probably tells you everything you need to know.
00:28:38.340 He might have been on some kind of medication for the back injury, maybe more than one.
00:28:44.500 That could have changed his thinking.
00:28:46.300 It could be that when you're in pain, everything looks different, and maybe he had a death wish, and he didn't care if he got killed.
00:28:52.560 Maybe he realized that his life wasn't going to be him becoming president and having a good life, so he needed to be important to make a difference in the world.
00:29:04.600 So, he picked this cause, thought he could get people on board, and he was right, because no matter what you think about this shooter, the shooter's stated objectives were met.
00:29:20.700 The stated objectives is to put attention on the fact that some of these capitalist enterprises are more bad than good.
00:29:30.460 That would be his point of view, not mine.
00:29:32.920 Now, I would say that he's got that message across.
00:29:36.900 If you look at the way people are reacting and the way people are often showing no sympathy whatsoever for the CEO, it feels like he read the room correctly, not the entire room, but he wasn't that far off base from where a lot of people's minds already were starting to drift, which is, I'm not sure if these people have our best interests in mind.
00:30:04.860 So, anyway, I still think he's weirdly rational, meaning that his views about capitalism are not off base.
00:30:18.400 I mean, I don't have a better idea than capitalism, but it's certainly true that there are a lot of big company executives who are doing terrible things to the public while making lots of money.
00:30:29.500 That part's true, and if he makes people think about that more...
00:30:34.860 He may have actually done something that he wanted to do, and maybe he thinks it's good for the world.
00:30:39.140 I don't know.
00:30:40.000 Now, I saw some...
00:30:42.380 The fact that he claimed that evidence was planted on him would suggest that either evidence was planted on him, or he is crazy.
00:30:53.700 I don't know.
00:30:54.160 It seems like a weak thing to say, unless it's true, because he doesn't feel like the guy who wants to claim that he was innocent.
00:31:04.540 Is he really going to tell us he's innocent?
00:31:08.360 But that it would make more sense, it would make more sense that they planted the objects on him than that this guy who was that smart had all those objects on him.
00:31:18.240 So, I don't know.
00:31:20.680 You could imagine it either way.
00:31:22.800 But I'm going to go with my working assumption is that his back injury is the explanation for all of the change in his brain.
00:31:30.940 Have I ever mentioned that your body is your brain?
00:31:35.860 Is this the first time you've heard it?
00:31:38.020 Yeah.
00:31:38.220 His brain should be completely distorted by the pain in his body.
00:31:45.620 I would think that would be normal.
00:31:47.920 So, it doesn't surprise me a bit, actually.
00:31:51.700 You may have heard that Trump continues to tease his prime minister from the North, Trudeau.
00:31:58.520 And in his statement on truth, he called Canada the great state of Canada, meaning like a future state of the United States.
00:32:08.000 And he called Trudeau the governor, kind of kidding him that Canada is not important enough to be its own country.
00:32:14.780 Maybe it should just be a United States.
00:32:16.380 And here's the thing.
00:32:21.780 It wasn't long ago, maybe during the first Trump administration, that if he had pulled this, calling Canada a state and joking with Trudeau that he's just a governor,
00:32:36.300 don't you think people would have gone nuts and said, oh, my God, he's embarrassing us on the world stage.
00:32:43.660 He's a bully.
00:32:45.080 Why can't we have normal people in office?
00:32:47.860 He's not normal.
00:32:49.400 Stop him.
00:32:50.140 He's, oh, look at his tweets.
00:32:51.420 Oh, God.
00:32:52.300 Oh, no.
00:32:55.040 And what did people do this time when he insulted Trudeau, bullied him, and put him in his place, so to speak?
00:33:06.140 Here's what's different.
00:33:07.400 Trump has transformed from that bad boy who couldn't stop doing all the wrong things, according to you, into what I call a character.
00:33:19.900 As a character, he has the freedom to act within that character.
00:33:26.460 And somehow we've just given it to him, because as long as he's in character, we kind of get what's going on.
00:33:32.540 So what's in character for Trump is this, bullying his peers, trying to get a little psychological advantage on them, sometimes joking with them because it gets you to a better negotiation at some point.
00:33:47.600 I feel like Trump has now cemented his place as the person who acts this way, and it's okay, meaning that we all survived his first term, and he was this way.
00:34:03.060 But now, since you know you survived it, and nothing bad happened because he talks this way, now he's just a character.
00:34:10.580 And as a character, he can be funnier.
00:34:13.240 I think I've taught you that the reason AI can't be funny is that it doesn't have a personality.
00:34:19.400 You have to have a personality in order to fit the humor to your personality, and it's the two of those things that work.
00:34:27.960 If you take the personality away and you just do the joke, there's nothing there.
00:34:31.800 It's the personality plus the joke that gets you the humor.
00:34:37.060 So that's Trump.
00:34:38.040 He's got the personality plus the jokes.
00:34:42.620 Trump can read a room better than anybody in politics, and I think Trump is reading the Canadian room as well as the American one.
00:34:51.600 I think Trump wants Trudeau to be replaced, and he's mocking him in public so that the Canadians say some version of, oh, did we just send our leader to the United States, and did he just get mocked and sent home?
00:35:08.520 Basically, this is a kill shot.
00:35:14.000 Trump is using a linguistic kill shot on our neighbor to change their government.
00:35:20.140 Will it make a difference?
00:35:22.140 It might.
00:35:23.660 It might.
00:35:24.700 It is powerful enough.
00:35:26.040 Because if we had, just imagine this.
00:35:29.720 Just imagine this.
00:35:31.320 Imagine some president of the United States who's not Trump, just some other regular president.
00:35:37.100 Say we send our regular president to some other world power, and after done, the world power literally mocks him as not worthy of being a president.
00:35:47.900 You can't even hold that in your head, can you?
00:35:52.160 America would go nuts.
00:35:54.240 We'd be like, oh, no, we have to get rid of our president so we don't send somebody over who gets mocked that way, or we need to invade the country that did it or something.
00:36:04.340 But having Trump even gently mocking him, I would think just takes his legs out from being a credible politician in the future.
00:36:19.480 So I would expect to see the end of Trudeau as a political actor really soon.
00:36:26.500 I think this might have been the last push.
00:36:28.860 We'll see.
00:36:29.560 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:36:38.040 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages.
00:36:41.360 Conditions apply.
00:36:43.180 Scotiabank.
00:36:43.900 You're richer than you think.
00:36:46.720 Meanwhile, Nancy Mace was attacked on the Capitol by what she says is a pro-trans man, and she had to get a new brace for her wrist.
00:36:58.960 I think her wrist was already hurt, and some ice for my arm, and it'll heal just fine, and the Capitol Police arrested him.
00:37:06.380 Now, you remember the story about the Democrat lawmaker who was attacked by the white supremacist?
00:37:15.640 You remember that story, right?
00:37:19.020 There was a Democrat lawmaker at the Capitol, and this white supremacist came in and just, like, started wailing on him.
00:37:30.580 You remember that?
00:37:31.800 No, it never happened.
00:37:33.480 Of course you don't remember it, because it never happened.
00:37:35.680 But Nancy Mace got attacked physically.
00:37:41.440 I wonder if there's any trend involved.
00:37:45.400 Well, let's see.
00:37:47.840 Nancy Mace was attacked physically.
00:37:51.140 Marjorie Taylor Greene got a bomb threat.
00:37:57.580 Birchett, also another Republican lawmaker, got a bomb threat.
00:38:02.060 Trump got a shot in the ear.
00:38:06.060 Do you see a pattern yet?
00:38:08.620 Yeah.
00:38:09.540 Republicans are still being hunted.
00:38:11.660 The J-6ers are still in jail.
00:38:15.380 Yep.
00:38:16.660 Still being hunted.
00:38:18.620 Well, I think that's going to change.
00:38:20.160 So, Joy Rea did another mentally unstable video where she looks in the camera with the eyes like this.
00:38:29.140 And I think Hitler's coming.
00:38:31.520 Oh, people.
00:38:32.720 Oh, I think Hitler's coming.
00:38:34.800 Hey, Hitler.
00:38:35.600 Orange Hitler.
00:38:36.820 Everybody can see it.
00:38:38.120 You can all see it.
00:38:39.080 You can all see it.
00:38:40.180 Orange Hitler's coming.
00:38:42.480 And I can't look away.
00:38:44.960 I watch every second of her videos because I just look at it and go,
00:38:49.300 Oh, what?
00:38:52.600 What is happening here?
00:38:55.080 So, here's one where I can't tell.
00:38:57.760 Is she really this stupid?
00:39:00.360 Or is she just doing this for political brainwashing propaganda effect?
00:39:06.740 She actually said that when Elon Musk and Trump and I think mostly those two,
00:39:13.460 they talk about running the country like a business,
00:39:17.840 Joy Rea takes that literally and then explains why running the country exactly like a business would be a bad idea.
00:39:27.720 Now, does Joy Rea not really understand how words work?
00:39:34.280 That doesn't make sense.
00:39:35.600 Doesn't she have like an IV education and she's on TV every night communicating very well?
00:39:41.960 Does she really not understand that when somebody like Musk says run the country like a business,
00:39:48.980 all they mean is don't do stupid shit?
00:39:51.300 That's all it means.
00:39:53.600 Just don't do stupid shit because companies don't or they try not to.
00:39:59.280 And she turned that into, well, if you're going to run like a country,
00:40:03.840 I guess you'd get rid of all those unnecessary expenses,
00:40:07.980 you know, like all the things that help people.
00:40:09.920 And like, no, no.
00:40:13.540 Everybody knows they don't mean that.
00:40:15.720 Everybody knows that just means don't do stupid shit.
00:40:18.360 Everybody knows that.
00:40:20.700 Does she, is she the only person in the world who doesn't understand what it means to run the government like a business?
00:40:29.320 Is she just lying?
00:40:31.960 And or, or trying to convince you that she really believes this is like a business.
00:40:37.340 I mean, I don't know.
00:40:40.380 I'm actually, my first instinct is she couldn't possibly be that dumb to think that they mean that literally
00:40:47.460 and that the analogy holds for every element of a business versus a corporation.
00:40:53.660 But on the other hand, this is exactly how Democrats argue.
00:40:57.500 They, they argue like the analogy is a literal.
00:41:01.440 They, they argue like hyperbole is literal.
00:41:05.660 I don't know.
00:41:07.060 She might be that dumb, but I, I, I'm, I'm going to lean toward its intentional bad behavior
00:41:14.120 and not, not something she can't control.
00:41:18.440 Meanwhile, James Carville continues to entertain.
00:41:22.460 He might be the only Democrat who fully understands what happened with the Democrats and what they did wrong.
00:41:31.120 So listening to him talk and having the Democrats, you know, not, not understand any of it.
00:41:37.260 It's just entertaining the hell out of me.
00:41:39.100 So here's what he says now.
00:41:41.720 He said, well, did the language of identity politics really didn't hurt us ever?
00:41:46.760 And he says it wasn't bad, but there's evidence for a fact that no one talked about it in 2024.
00:41:52.280 So he's talking to somebody else's argument that, that identity politics couldn't have hurt them
00:41:57.960 because the Democrats weren't really talking about identity politics during the race.
00:42:04.780 And Carville says, so he goes, so wait a minute, if you have an idea and no one talks about it
00:42:11.760 and you still insist it was a good idea, it doesn't make any sense.
00:42:15.400 Right. So the Democrats, their, their, their top thing was identity politics,
00:42:22.300 but I think he correctly, correctly notes that when they ran for office,
00:42:27.260 suddenly their top thing disappeared.
00:42:30.420 It's because their top thing was just toxic and bad for the country.
00:42:35.200 So they couldn't even lead with their top thing because even they knew it wasn't a good thing.
00:42:41.740 If they believe their top thing was a good thing,
00:42:44.080 they certainly would have made it the, the focus of their entire campaign.
00:42:48.860 So Carville is totally correct that they were, that their philosophy,
00:42:53.560 even they knew was so weak that they couldn't mention it while running for office.
00:43:00.540 Wow. He's right about that.
00:43:04.100 But he says, and he points out that, uh, you know,
00:43:07.420 one side doesn't get to make all the rules. The other, the other side gets a vote too.
00:43:11.120 So he talks about how the Republicans, um,
00:43:14.080 very, very, very smartly focused on the identity politics because the public,
00:43:20.320 you know, believed that it was a thing.
00:43:23.800 And if there can't, if the Democrats weren't talking about it at this minute,
00:43:28.000 certainly everybody in the country still knew it was a thing.
00:43:30.860 So.
00:43:31.580 So he said, uh,
00:43:34.940 um,
00:43:37.540 he said that the late deciders,
00:43:39.560 78% of them thought Democrats want to defund the police.
00:43:44.400 Now,
00:43:45.500 um,
00:43:46.900 it is true that there were a lot of Democrats who did want to defund the police at one point,
00:43:51.640 including Kamala Harris.
00:43:52.860 It's not true that they were running on that.
00:43:56.100 I don't know that anybody was running on it,
00:43:58.800 but,
00:43:59.680 uh,
00:44:01.500 if 78% think Democrats want to defund the police,
00:44:04.720 that means that the Republicans were winning on messaging for sure.
00:44:09.040 Anyway, uh,
00:44:12.760 Carville will have no hope of convincing the other Democrats because they're still,
00:44:17.120 they're still stuck in a gaslighting environment.
00:44:19.780 They really,
00:44:20.880 really genuinely don't know what went wrong.
00:44:24.960 That's why it's so quiet.
00:44:26.160 I think they,
00:44:27.680 they're looking around and saying,
00:44:29.460 did we get,
00:44:30.780 did we get everything wrong?
00:44:32.500 Are we the bad guys?
00:44:34.200 And the answer is yes.
00:44:36.040 You got everything wrong and you are the bad guys.
00:44:38.720 Absolutely.
00:44:39.780 Yeah.
00:44:40.200 That's not even politics.
00:44:41.600 I'm just talking common sense.
00:44:43.680 Whoever opens the border to me,
00:44:45.320 that's not politics.
00:44:46.800 If you open the border,
00:44:49.120 no,
00:44:49.640 I'm sorry.
00:44:50.220 I'm not going to call that politics.
00:44:52.360 That that's a whole different level.
00:44:54.700 Whatever that is,
00:44:56.240 it's not politics.
00:45:00.220 Anyway,
00:45:00.660 here's my favorite story that kind of wraps it up.
00:45:03.780 Post-millennial is talking about it.
00:45:07.240 Apparently the,
00:45:08.100 the,
00:45:10.000 the black Kamala Harris campaign staffers were complaining about all the outright
00:45:17.220 racial discrimination against them during the race.
00:45:22.660 So Kamala Harris is black campaign.
00:45:26.320 People believed that working for the black candidate,
00:45:31.580 they were discriminated against for being black.
00:45:37.460 Does that sound like something that really happened?
00:45:41.740 I don't know.
00:45:43.820 But I'll tell you this.
00:45:46.000 Remember,
00:45:46.740 I've told you that reality is best decided by what is predictive.
00:45:51.360 What is predictive.
00:45:53.800 So if you've got a,
00:45:55.020 a theory on life that predicts what happens next,
00:45:58.520 that might be as close as you can get to understanding reality.
00:46:02.920 You still might be in some illusion,
00:46:05.380 but at least if you,
00:46:06.500 whatever your illusion is predicts the next step,
00:46:09.300 well,
00:46:09.520 you've got an advantage.
00:46:10.360 I mean,
00:46:11.540 that's good.
00:46:12.560 So let's test this against my view of reality.
00:46:16.400 My view of reality is that identity politics destroys everything it touches.
00:46:21.480 And that it does it in the order of what it touches hardest and first.
00:46:28.400 So anything that had lots of it and fast destroys itself.
00:46:34.000 So the Kamala Harris campaign,
00:46:36.420 I would say destroyed itself.
00:46:38.860 Would you agree?
00:46:39.640 First of all,
00:46:40.180 that that's an accurate observation,
00:46:41.520 that the campaign was largely incompetent compared to the Trump campaign for sure.
00:46:47.400 So I think you agree on that.
00:46:48.820 So certainly there was something organically terribly wrong with the campaign itself.
00:46:55.680 And we could see it every day.
00:46:57.300 I mean,
00:46:57.480 it was obvious even from the outside.
00:46:59.640 Now we find out that there was mass problems and that identity politics were top of mind within the campaign.
00:47:10.360 So my prediction is that the place that has the hardest,
00:47:15.440 fastest DEI identity politics issue will be the one that's most thoroughly destroyed the fastest.
00:47:24.440 Here it is.
00:47:25.980 So my prediction holds.
00:47:27.900 Now it's only a one point prediction,
00:47:29.420 right?
00:47:29.660 So you'd like to see the prediction work for other things.
00:47:32.420 So I would say that it has destroyed the campaign because the campaign had the highest concentration of identity politics.
00:47:39.400 So it was the most destroyed.
00:47:42.300 Secondly,
00:47:43.440 the Democrat Party in general had the next highest focused identity politics thing,
00:47:51.400 and it destroyed the entire Democratic Party.
00:47:55.040 Then you go up to the next level,
00:47:56.660 which is the United States.
00:47:58.020 But the United States had half the country,
00:48:01.280 you know,
00:48:01.760 roughly half the country who were not on board with identity politics and wanted to erase it from our minds.
00:48:08.040 And then half the country were deeply focused on it.
00:48:11.220 That predicts,
00:48:12.660 that predicts that you would have massive problems from identity politics,
00:48:17.680 but maybe your country would survive because it was only,
00:48:21.880 it's not a saturation.
00:48:22.940 See,
00:48:24.000 the Harris campaign was saturated with identity,
00:48:28.300 destroyed it.
00:48:29.240 The Democrat Party,
00:48:30.900 saturated with identity politics,
00:48:33.560 destroyed.
00:48:35.220 Now,
00:48:35.740 I think the party might be able to reform itself over time.
00:48:40.820 The Harris campaign is dead forever.
00:48:43.080 She's not going to run in 2028 and win an election.
00:48:46.480 So,
00:48:46.840 so again,
00:48:48.280 the consistency of my prediction.
00:48:50.540 So she had the most focus.
00:48:52.160 She's the most destroyed.
00:48:54.020 Democrats had the next most focus,
00:48:56.700 pretty,
00:48:57.320 pretty thoroughly destroyed,
00:48:59.480 but maybe with a chance to come back.
00:49:02.020 The America itself had a 50% saturation,
00:49:07.060 which really,
00:49:08.440 really fucked us up.
00:49:10.480 But we're a strong country and we,
00:49:14.080 we had enough balls to figure out how to get out of it.
00:49:19.400 Because that's what it took.
00:49:20.720 It just took,
00:49:21.380 it took people taking a arrow in the back and the forehead and the side.
00:49:25.380 It took people like me.
00:49:27.940 Here,
00:49:28.460 I'm not trying to,
00:49:29.760 I'm not trying to put myself as a hero because I was just doing what I felt like I needed to do.
00:49:35.580 I wasn't doing it for a bigger purpose.
00:49:40.480 So there you go.
00:49:42.560 Identity politics as a prediction will destroy everything where it's first and most focused.
00:49:49.080 And you'll see that you could put it on a graph and you'd see it every,
00:49:54.220 every place.
00:49:56.240 Meanwhile,
00:49:56.980 Melinda French Gates,
00:49:58.520 the,
00:49:58.740 the ex of Bill Gates is donating 150 million to a bunch of nonprofits.
00:50:04.840 That's a lot of it is to help remove barriers for women in the workplace.
00:50:12.800 What?
00:50:14.760 What?
00:50:16.840 Barriers for women in the workplace.
00:50:20.700 What,
00:50:21.220 what barrier are you talking about?
00:50:24.380 Here's a woman who clearly has not had to apply for a job in a long time.
00:50:29.780 Does Melinda French not know that if a man and a woman go into the same interview and they have similar or even anywhere in the same ballpark credentials,
00:50:42.420 that the woman gets hired every time,
00:50:44.420 every time in corporate America.
00:50:47.400 What problem is she,
00:50:48.760 is she fixing?
00:50:50.080 I don't know any company that doesn't prefer females over males for hiring,
00:50:56.500 including construction.
00:50:57.560 Because even the construction guys would be like,
00:51:01.160 oh,
00:51:01.420 we better get some diversity in here.
00:51:02.900 Oh,
00:51:03.240 there's a woman applying.
00:51:04.340 She's has all the skills.
00:51:05.960 Yes,
00:51:06.280 definitely get the woman.
00:51:07.380 Well,
00:51:07.560 there's a guy applying to no,
00:51:09.180 no,
00:51:09.300 no,
00:51:09.400 we need a woman.
00:51:10.480 We better get some women in here because we'll get in trouble.
00:51:13.840 So no,
00:51:14.600 I don't know any company.
00:51:16.360 I've never even heard of it in my entire life.
00:51:19.440 I've never heard of a place that wouldn't hire qualified women.
00:51:23.700 Have you?
00:51:25.300 Have you ever even heard of it?
00:51:26.500 Have you heard of one person telling the story that the qualified woman couldn't get a promotion or a raise?
00:51:34.040 Even once?
00:51:36.140 No,
00:51:36.820 I absolutely believe it was true in our past.
00:51:40.880 And you don't have to go that far back for it to be true.
00:51:44.400 70s,
00:51:45.000 80s,
00:51:45.500 definitely true then.
00:51:46.220 But today?
00:51:48.800 Today?
00:51:49.700 2024?
00:51:51.180 It's not even close.
00:51:52.740 Women have far advantages over men in employment.
00:51:56.780 It's not even close.
00:51:58.560 What world is she living in?
00:52:00.720 It's puzzling.
00:52:02.040 But I would use her as an example of somebody who,
00:52:06.660 unlike James Carville,
00:52:08.880 she doesn't know that she's making things worse.
00:52:13.340 When I look at this,
00:52:14.440 it almost looks like it's revenge against Bill Gates.
00:52:17.420 Like it's some kind of angry way to spend his money on something that's just,
00:52:22.200 that he would hate.
00:52:22.880 Because do you think Bill Gates is happy to see $150 million of what used to be his money
00:52:29.020 go to something that,
00:52:30.980 because Bill Gates is not an idiot,
00:52:33.100 he knows that Microsoft loves hiring women.
00:52:36.220 He knows it.
00:52:38.500 Oh my God.
00:52:40.840 All right.
00:52:41.280 So there's a story that the Department of Justice,
00:52:45.680 back in the old Trump administration,
00:52:48.660 spied on Kash Patel and other federal employees,
00:52:52.140 including two House members.
00:52:55.680 And it had something to do with Kash Patel looking into the Russia collusion hoax,
00:53:01.600 I think.
00:53:03.780 I have a little uncertainty about this story,
00:53:06.380 but what seems to be true is the Department of Justice did spy on Kash Patel,
00:53:11.280 and other people.
00:53:12.980 Whether they had good reason to do that,
00:53:15.360 we haven't heard any.
00:53:17.280 So I do have a feeling that
00:53:20.140 Kash might be going into that FBI job with a little bit of a chip on his shoulder.
00:53:26.720 And boy,
00:53:27.200 does he deserve a chip on his shoulder.
00:53:29.160 If there's anybody
00:53:30.060 who you would allow to operate with a chip on their shoulder,
00:53:34.900 it's him.
00:53:35.840 Because it's a real chip.
00:53:37.940 He's not imagining it.
00:53:39.320 Like they really went after him.
00:53:41.280 So even though that was the Trump administration,
00:53:44.840 the DOJ wasn't,
00:53:46.060 I don't think,
00:53:47.640 I think it's fair to say Trump did not order,
00:53:51.060 he did not order the investigation of Kash Patel.
00:53:54.220 So the DOJ has some answering.
00:53:57.540 But also on the Kash Patel story,
00:54:01.320 he said on Steve Bannon's War Room on a 2023 episode,
00:54:05.400 that we will go out and find the conspirators,
00:54:09.000 not just in government,
00:54:10.080 but in the media.
00:54:11.960 And he said,
00:54:12.520 quote,
00:54:12.800 yes,
00:54:13.080 we're going to come after the people in the media
00:54:15.100 who lied about American citizens,
00:54:17.840 who helped Joe Biden rig elections.
00:54:20.660 We're going to come after you.
00:54:21.960 Whether that's criminally or civilly,
00:54:23.680 we're going to figure that out.
00:54:24.860 But yeah,
00:54:25.680 we're putting you all on notice.
00:54:28.780 Now,
00:54:29.780 here's my question.
00:54:34.180 Where's the crime?
00:54:37.120 It's certainly bad behavior
00:54:38.540 for the media to collude with the Democrats
00:54:42.640 and effectively lie and create hoaxes
00:54:46.100 and support narratives they know are not true.
00:54:48.680 But is that illegal?
00:54:51.660 Is it even something you could sue over?
00:54:54.780 Because it's sort of how our entire system works.
00:54:58.580 If you could criminalize the actions
00:55:03.340 or civilly sue somebody
00:55:05.020 for who is in politics,
00:55:07.640 if they also influence the news
00:55:10.400 to, let's say,
00:55:12.200 use their narrative,
00:55:14.200 is that illegal?
00:55:17.200 And is it only illegal
00:55:19.720 if they're making up something
00:55:21.920 that isn't true,
00:55:22.900 like the Russia collusion hoax?
00:55:25.220 What if somebody influences Fox News
00:55:28.340 just by being a really good guest?
00:55:32.080 Just some Republican.
00:55:33.640 They're just really good guests.
00:55:35.140 And then that really good guest
00:55:36.420 goes on Fox News, hypothetically.
00:55:39.180 And then the other hosts,
00:55:40.700 the opinion people,
00:55:41.500 listen to it and they go,
00:55:42.320 oh, wow,
00:55:42.840 that's a pretty good opinion.
00:55:44.320 The way that person stated it is so good,
00:55:46.560 I'm going to adopt that.
00:55:47.880 I like it.
00:55:49.060 Would that be a case of the media colluding
00:55:51.880 with a Republican?
00:55:54.080 Or would it just be Republicans
00:55:55.940 and commenters saying,
00:55:58.120 oh, that's a good reframing of that issue.
00:56:00.340 I'm going to use that.
00:56:02.440 But suppose that politician
00:56:04.840 came on to Fox News,
00:56:06.900 and I haven't seen this.
00:56:08.080 I don't know that this has happened.
00:56:09.900 I think I'm going to be fact-checked on that.
00:56:11.700 Somebody's going to tell me it did happen,
00:56:13.020 but I can't think of an example.
00:56:15.160 Suppose somebody came on to Fox News,
00:56:16.820 they were a Republican politician,
00:56:19.700 and they said blah, blah,
00:56:22.060 and they created a hoax.
00:56:24.020 Just out of nothing,
00:56:25.320 like the fine people hoax
00:56:26.540 or the drinking bleach hoax,
00:56:28.300 just some hoax.
00:56:30.200 And then let's say Fox News adopted the hoax
00:56:32.960 and maybe even had meetings
00:56:36.360 and said, hey, we're all on the same team,
00:56:38.360 so we're going to push that hoax.
00:56:39.540 Now, none of that happened as far as I know.
00:56:42.260 I don't think that happens on Fox News.
00:56:44.400 But what if it did?
00:56:46.540 Would that be illegal?
00:56:48.700 And if it were, what crime would it be?
00:56:52.340 And if you could sue them civilly,
00:56:55.000 for what?
00:56:57.120 What exactly would you sue them for?
00:56:59.660 Because it's so basic
00:57:01.340 that people lie about other people,
00:57:04.260 especially in politics.
00:57:05.320 I don't know that you could ever sort out
00:57:07.640 like what was too far,
00:57:09.760 what's over the line.
00:57:12.000 I don't know.
00:57:13.120 It's just catchy stuff.
00:57:14.860 But do I think that Kash Patel has,
00:57:18.120 I think he has the right mindset
00:57:19.420 that the way the media lied to the people
00:57:23.580 and worked with the Democrats
00:57:24.780 didn't look like news.
00:57:27.360 I think on the right,
00:57:28.720 when they get things wrong,
00:57:30.480 it's because they thought it was right.
00:57:32.140 On the left, when they get things wrong,
00:57:34.820 it's because they know
00:57:35.600 they're running a hoax.
00:57:37.360 At least the people atop
00:57:38.600 know they're running a hoax.
00:57:39.820 It's really different.
00:57:41.700 So something needs to be done
00:57:43.840 about the hoaxing.
00:57:45.440 But I don't know that jail
00:57:46.920 or the courts are the answer to it.
00:57:50.620 I don't know what the answer is,
00:57:51.560 but I don't think they are the answer.
00:57:54.300 So it bothers me when somebody
00:57:55.920 who I would consider on my side,
00:57:58.860 that would be the conservative side of America,
00:58:02.140 where although I don't identify
00:58:04.720 as a conservative,
00:58:06.080 I prefer their company
00:58:08.200 and I prefer their management.
00:58:11.480 So that's where I'm at.
00:58:14.960 So I prefer Kash Patel
00:58:17.240 and people like him being in charge
00:58:19.440 of our vital things.
00:58:21.080 But he does make me uncomfortable
00:58:22.940 when he talks about finding the crime.
00:58:27.020 He's basically saying,
00:58:30.820 here's the people.
00:58:31.680 Now I'm going to go find a crime.
00:58:33.360 He didn't use those words,
00:58:34.720 but that's how it comes across.
00:58:36.580 And that's never okay.
00:58:38.760 It's never okay.
00:58:40.160 So I do not want to see Kash Patel
00:58:42.560 or the Department of Justice
00:58:43.940 or anybody in the Trump administration
00:58:46.060 doing the Stalin thing
00:58:49.180 where we don't like Adam Schiff,
00:58:51.020 so we're going to look for everything
00:58:52.840 that's a crime until we find one.
00:58:54.280 I mean, I really, really don't like Adam Schiff
00:58:57.000 and I think he's bad for the country
00:58:59.120 in a dozen different ways.
00:59:02.780 But no, I don't want them to say,
00:59:04.860 let's start with Adam Schiff
00:59:05.840 and go see if there's a crime we can put.
00:59:07.840 No, nope, nope.
00:59:09.600 That's a hard no.
00:59:11.520 Can't live in that country.
00:59:13.940 So, and I hope there's enough people
00:59:17.680 on the right who would agree on that.
00:59:19.360 I know some people just want revenge,
00:59:20.980 but you got to think beyond that.
00:59:28.740 I saw a opinion by Mike Cernovich
00:59:31.420 that I wanted to add a little to.
00:59:34.700 He said in a post today,
00:59:36.160 he said,
00:59:36.460 can we finally accept
00:59:37.540 that most of the subway psychopaths
00:59:39.700 are the result of high dose of weed products
00:59:42.820 and the resulting psychosis?
00:59:45.160 What do you think?
00:59:48.760 Before I give you my opinion,
00:59:50.880 do you think that high dose weed products
00:59:54.580 are causing the,
00:59:56.660 what seems to be the increase
00:59:57.980 in mental illness of the dangerous type?
01:00:02.000 Well, here's what I would add.
01:00:04.300 If you're talking about,
01:00:05.640 if you're talking about weed
01:00:07.760 that comes in a flower form
01:00:10.040 and you put it in a pipe or a joint
01:00:11.740 and you smoke it,
01:00:13.320 definitely not.
01:00:15.160 100% not.
01:00:17.940 With not even 1%.
01:00:19.860 There's no chance.
01:00:21.640 It'd be like,
01:00:22.380 does this anvil float?
01:00:24.120 No, not if it's an anvil.
01:00:26.440 Anvils don't float.
01:00:28.540 So, but there is a way
01:00:32.940 which Mike is right
01:00:35.420 because he sort of generically
01:00:38.420 calls it a high dose weed products.
01:00:41.200 And then some people said,
01:00:42.660 well, you know,
01:00:43.200 a friend of mine did a vape.
01:00:46.440 It should have been a weed vape,
01:00:47.740 but got a psychosis.
01:00:50.760 Now, in that case,
01:00:52.120 it was like a two hour psychosis.
01:00:54.380 I don't think that's what's happening
01:00:55.760 with the people
01:00:56.360 who are going crazy on subways.
01:00:58.360 I don't think it's a two hour problem.
01:00:59.880 It's probably a life problem.
01:01:01.900 But I don't think vaping is always weed.
01:01:05.800 I think the vapes,
01:01:07.280 first of all,
01:01:07.840 they put in other chemicals.
01:01:09.640 Second of all,
01:01:10.400 if you've ever tried vaping
01:01:11.700 and you've also tried
01:01:13.000 the regular version of weed,
01:01:15.420 the feeling you get
01:01:16.940 and the experience
01:01:17.800 aren't even close.
01:01:20.560 I love ordinary weed,
01:01:23.520 the legal kind,
01:01:24.960 but vaping,
01:01:26.620 not even a little bit.
01:01:27.720 It's not even,
01:01:28.240 it's not even a little bit attractive.
01:01:30.760 I know how it feels
01:01:31.940 and it just doesn't add much.
01:01:33.680 It just makes you kind of tired
01:01:34.660 and stupid.
01:01:36.100 So if that's weed,
01:01:37.300 I feel like maybe
01:01:40.420 they're slipping in
01:01:41.220 a little extra chemical there.
01:01:43.060 I don't know what,
01:01:44.360 but I worry that there's
01:01:46.120 like a trace of fentanyl
01:01:47.560 in there
01:01:47.960 or some damn thing.
01:01:49.400 So if you don't know
01:01:51.580 what you're getting,
01:01:52.860 that might be a bigger problem.
01:01:54.840 Yes.
01:01:55.400 And then there are also some,
01:01:56.540 what's the word for,
01:01:59.080 like artificial versions of weed.
01:02:05.920 So if it's an artificial version
01:02:07.800 or something called spice
01:02:09.120 or something made in a laboratory,
01:02:11.220 but it's like they call it
01:02:12.880 something about weed,
01:02:13.940 but it's really made in a laboratory.
01:02:15.740 I can see that giving you psychosis.
01:02:18.300 I'm no expert,
01:02:19.080 but so I'm going to agree
01:02:21.720 with Mike's take
01:02:22.920 that what he calls
01:02:26.080 the high-dose weed products
01:02:27.580 might be behind some of it.
01:02:32.520 It's a reasonable hypothesis,
01:02:35.800 but certainly not regular weed.
01:02:39.100 It's definitely not.
01:02:39.840 100% regular weed
01:02:43.720 is not causing any problems
01:02:44.980 that look like that.
01:02:48.720 I woke up to see a claim on X
01:02:51.800 that a bus-sized drone
01:02:53.340 had crashed in New York
01:02:54.540 or New Jersey
01:02:55.420 and the roads were closed
01:02:57.140 and soon we would see
01:02:58.920 these alien UAPs or UFOs
01:03:01.980 because one of them,
01:03:02.820 the size of a bus,
01:03:04.000 crashed and they got it surrounded
01:03:05.560 and they're looking into it.
01:03:07.860 But it turns out
01:03:08.840 it was just an automobile accident
01:03:10.480 and it was nothing like a UFO.
01:03:13.240 It was fake.
01:03:15.420 Then, of course,
01:03:16.080 have you seen
01:03:16.640 some of the impressive videos
01:03:18.940 of these shining objects
01:03:21.020 sometimes going into the ocean
01:03:22.380 and sometimes coming out?
01:03:24.740 Do those look real to you?
01:03:27.480 Do those videos look real?
01:03:30.120 It's kind of,
01:03:31.500 it's messing with my head.
01:03:33.020 Synthetic, thank you.
01:03:35.100 All morning I've been trying
01:03:36.220 to think of the word synthetic.
01:03:37.500 Synthetic, referring to the weed,
01:03:41.080 there is a synthetic form
01:03:42.740 of marijuana
01:03:44.080 that I wouldn't trust at all.
01:03:46.260 Like not even a little bit.
01:03:47.960 I wouldn't go near it.
01:03:50.760 But, so if that's the kind of product
01:03:53.320 that Mike Sernovich
01:03:55.200 is talking about,
01:03:55.840 the synthetics
01:03:56.500 and maybe the vaping,
01:03:59.280 yeah, I would stay away from those.
01:04:01.840 I would stay way away
01:04:02.960 from both of those.
01:04:03.680 All right, so yeah,
01:04:06.160 I don't believe any of the videos,
01:04:07.640 but it's funny
01:04:08.120 that we live in a time
01:04:09.420 when videos are easier to fake
01:04:12.100 because of AI
01:04:12.920 and we're getting tons of videos.
01:04:17.440 So here's my theory.
01:04:19.200 Some experts said the same thing.
01:04:22.740 That the fact that the FBI
01:04:25.880 says they don't know what it is
01:04:27.540 doesn't mean anything.
01:04:29.140 That doesn't mean
01:04:30.220 that the government's not involved.
01:04:33.600 If it's really a top secret
01:04:35.500 drone exercise,
01:04:37.540 the FBI would not know.
01:04:39.740 The local police would not know.
01:04:42.040 And most of the military
01:04:43.480 would not know.
01:04:44.700 And there might be only 12 people
01:04:46.160 in the world
01:04:46.740 who actually know.
01:04:48.760 And it might be the 12 people
01:04:49.940 in some deep secret military thing
01:04:52.780 where they're sending
01:04:53.880 the drones around.
01:04:54.740 Now, the second question would be,
01:04:56.000 and I'm stealing this
01:05:01.160 from an expert whose name
01:05:02.600 I forgot to write down,
01:05:04.000 so I'm a terrible person.
01:05:05.340 Oh, Emerson.
01:05:06.460 Emerson is his name.
01:05:08.720 And he was saying that
01:05:09.700 if the drones being tested
01:05:12.020 are for collecting data,
01:05:15.640 so they might be practicing
01:05:17.400 sucking up massive phone calls,
01:05:20.020 cell phones,
01:05:20.900 they might be practicing,
01:05:22.460 I don't know,
01:05:24.280 navigation without GPS.
01:05:27.200 They might be practicing
01:05:28.160 some kind of
01:05:30.540 just monitoring people's behavior,
01:05:34.280 something like that.
01:05:35.580 So,
01:05:36.960 he thinks that there might be
01:05:39.040 a test of
01:05:40.580 signal
01:05:41.620 signal interception equipment
01:05:44.180 that they wouldn't want
01:05:46.260 to tell you about.
01:05:48.400 Let's say you developed
01:05:50.040 a drone
01:05:50.780 which is made
01:05:51.880 to hover over
01:05:52.960 populated areas
01:05:54.420 and suck up
01:05:55.120 all their cell phone conversations.
01:05:57.960 Would you tell the public?
01:06:00.980 You can't tell the public.
01:06:02.720 And it might be
01:06:03.300 the only way
01:06:03.740 you could test it.
01:06:04.840 The only way
01:06:05.760 you could test it
01:06:06.600 is on a real population.
01:06:09.800 But,
01:06:10.800 the real population
01:06:11.880 would say,
01:06:12.320 are you kidding?
01:06:13.360 You are just testing,
01:06:14.700 stealing my cell phone data?
01:06:16.660 No, thank you.
01:06:18.020 How about
01:06:18.660 you stop that right away?
01:06:22.880 But,
01:06:23.360 let's say it was necessary.
01:06:25.040 Let's say the military said,
01:06:26.280 you know,
01:06:27.060 this is not ideal,
01:06:28.280 but it's the only way
01:06:29.140 we can test it.
01:06:30.340 It has to be
01:06:30.820 over a real population
01:06:31.800 and we won't use the data.
01:06:34.440 So,
01:06:34.900 we'll see if we can collect it,
01:06:36.500 but then we won't
01:06:37.400 collate it
01:06:38.040 or attach it
01:06:38.620 to any personality.
01:06:39.780 So,
01:06:40.160 we won't actually do anything
01:06:41.240 that puts you in danger,
01:06:42.620 but it will test the technology.
01:06:44.980 Could it absorb
01:06:45.740 these signals
01:06:46.380 and store them?
01:06:47.380 So,
01:06:48.520 maybe.
01:06:50.860 My guess is
01:06:51.840 that it's a
01:06:52.560 military operation,
01:06:54.100 otherwise we'd see
01:06:54.900 military response,
01:06:56.580 obviously.
01:06:57.340 We'd see a military
01:06:58.060 response by now.
01:06:59.840 So,
01:07:00.360 it's got to be military
01:07:01.240 and I don't think
01:07:02.360 the FBI necessarily knows
01:07:03.720 and I don't think
01:07:04.340 the local police know,
01:07:06.480 but the tell
01:07:07.100 is that people
01:07:08.820 like the governor
01:07:09.520 of New Jersey
01:07:10.540 say things like,
01:07:12.240 we don't think
01:07:12.740 there's a threat.
01:07:14.520 How do you know that
01:07:15.920 if you don't know
01:07:16.640 what it is?
01:07:18.240 The only way
01:07:19.140 you know it's not
01:07:19.860 a threat,
01:07:21.020 the only way
01:07:21.820 is if the people
01:07:23.760 who are doing it
01:07:24.880 told you to say that.
01:07:29.580 That's the only way.
01:07:31.180 So,
01:07:31.640 if the governor
01:07:32.240 got a call
01:07:32.740 from somebody
01:07:33.260 who said,
01:07:34.260 you know,
01:07:34.760 I can't tell you
01:07:35.500 what's going on,
01:07:36.940 but I can assure you
01:07:38.060 and the only thing
01:07:39.700 you have to go on
01:07:40.360 is my credibility
01:07:41.200 as let's say
01:07:42.820 a general
01:07:43.300 in the military,
01:07:44.480 maybe some general.
01:07:45.720 The only thing
01:07:46.420 I can offer you
01:07:47.060 is my credibility
01:07:47.940 of, you know,
01:07:48.660 30 years in the service.
01:07:49.920 I'm a general.
01:07:50.840 I assure you
01:07:51.900 there's no risk
01:07:53.120 to the public.
01:07:54.660 But beyond that,
01:07:55.580 we have no information
01:07:56.740 to give you.
01:07:58.980 Doesn't it sound
01:07:59.620 like that happened?
01:08:01.060 I think that happened.
01:08:02.200 Otherwise,
01:08:02.540 the governor
01:08:02.900 would already be,
01:08:04.300 you know,
01:08:05.280 maybe moving people
01:08:06.580 into the zone
01:08:07.320 or something.
01:08:08.060 You'd relocate people.
01:08:09.060 So I think the governor
01:08:10.800 must have been told
01:08:12.020 and maybe the local police
01:08:13.360 must have been told
01:08:14.560 that it's no risk
01:08:16.680 and the only person
01:08:17.820 who could tell them that
01:08:18.760 are the people behind it.
01:08:21.420 Nobody else would know.
01:08:24.020 So I think
01:08:24.880 it's kind of obvious
01:08:25.600 what it is.
01:08:26.560 It's obviously military.
01:08:28.000 It's obvious
01:08:28.440 that the authorities
01:08:30.100 don't know the details,
01:08:31.260 but they have been told
01:08:31.900 not to worry.
01:08:34.520 All right.
01:08:34.780 So some of
01:08:39.140 the January 6th
01:08:41.560 committee people,
01:08:43.060 they say Trump
01:08:44.000 is trying to send
01:08:44.700 a message
01:08:45.240 with his calls
01:08:47.020 for their imprisonment.
01:08:48.820 So I think
01:08:49.880 the January 6th
01:08:50.820 committee
01:08:51.100 was completely corrupt.
01:08:54.220 But as I've said before,
01:08:56.100 I'm not aware
01:08:57.060 of a specific law
01:08:58.600 that they broke.
01:09:00.420 They seem to have lied.
01:09:01.920 They seem to have destroyed
01:09:02.940 some information,
01:09:06.260 but they would claim
01:09:07.600 maybe it was accidental.
01:09:08.880 I don't know.
01:09:09.660 But there's definitely
01:09:11.320 tons of bad behavior.
01:09:13.300 You know,
01:09:13.440 there's lying,
01:09:14.420 there's, you know,
01:09:15.400 ignoring exculpatory evidence.
01:09:17.680 Every bit of it
01:09:18.500 was crooked and bad.
01:09:20.580 But was it illegal?
01:09:23.740 I think I saw
01:09:25.100 Jonathan Turley say
01:09:26.340 there's no specific crime
01:09:27.980 that looks like
01:09:29.620 they can get a conviction.
01:09:31.100 You know,
01:09:31.260 there's nothing
01:09:31.680 that the public can see
01:09:32.780 that looked like
01:09:34.040 it's illegal.
01:09:35.640 And since I'm not a lawyer,
01:09:37.420 I'll just take his,
01:09:39.000 I hope I've interpreted
01:09:40.260 that correctly,
01:09:41.080 but I think he doesn't see
01:09:42.760 a path to a crime.
01:09:44.600 But I don't mind
01:09:45.740 that they're threatened
01:09:46.520 with it.
01:09:48.000 I don't mind
01:09:48.800 that they're threatened
01:09:49.540 because the behavior
01:09:51.220 was certainly
01:09:52.080 as bad as a crime.
01:09:53.620 I would say worse.
01:09:54.900 It was worse
01:09:55.640 than a lot of crimes
01:09:56.540 that are definitely illegal.
01:09:58.360 and I'd hate
01:10:00.860 that nothing happens
01:10:02.680 because of a technicality.
01:10:04.760 But certainly people
01:10:05.840 who engage
01:10:07.680 in that kind of behavior,
01:10:09.260 the January 6th
01:10:10.300 select committee,
01:10:11.600 some of the worst
01:10:12.320 human beings
01:10:13.100 I've ever seen.
01:10:14.660 I mean,
01:10:14.840 you have to be
01:10:15.260 a terrible human being
01:10:16.820 to be part of that.
01:10:19.660 That's,
01:10:20.180 I,
01:10:20.800 you can't respect
01:10:21.820 any part of that.
01:10:25.140 Anyway,
01:10:26.080 I,
01:10:28.360 so Republicans
01:10:30.040 think that,
01:10:32.300 or there's a thought
01:10:34.140 that no Republican
01:10:36.040 senator is going
01:10:36.920 to fight Trump
01:10:37.780 if he tries to pardon
01:10:39.120 the January 6th people.
01:10:41.660 I would go further
01:10:42.860 and say,
01:10:43.520 if you're a Republican
01:10:44.400 and you oppose
01:10:46.300 January 6th pardons,
01:10:48.540 good luck
01:10:49.520 getting reelected.
01:10:51.780 If you want to know
01:10:52.800 the fastest way
01:10:53.680 to not get reelected,
01:10:55.520 just go in public
01:10:56.700 and say you don't agree
01:10:57.720 with those January 6th pardons.
01:11:00.480 You are so done.
01:11:03.700 All right.
01:11:04.140 This is,
01:11:04.880 this is a serious red line.
01:11:07.420 Any Republican
01:11:08.220 who crosses this line
01:11:10.300 and says anybody
01:11:11.280 on the January,
01:11:11.900 anybody on the January 6th
01:11:13.340 should stay in jail,
01:11:14.400 even the violent ones,
01:11:15.880 even the violent ones,
01:11:17.140 I think you're out of business.
01:11:19.140 You should be.
01:11:19.740 I don't,
01:11:22.680 I do not see
01:11:24.460 any possible way
01:11:25.560 that a Republican
01:11:26.240 could get reelected
01:11:27.400 with that point of view.
01:11:30.320 Although,
01:11:30.960 it would agree
01:11:31.540 with the Democrat
01:11:32.300 they're running against.
01:11:34.880 So,
01:11:35.680 I'm rethinking this
01:11:36.620 on the fly.
01:11:38.380 I'm thinking
01:11:39.020 that the Republicans
01:11:39.940 wouldn't support
01:11:40.700 the Republican,
01:11:41.720 but they also
01:11:42.680 wouldn't want
01:11:43.100 the Democrat.
01:11:44.780 I don't know.
01:11:45.700 I think this would be
01:11:46.620 one where I'd rather
01:11:47.380 have the Democrat win.
01:11:50.200 Well,
01:11:50.740 no,
01:11:51.040 because the Democrat
01:11:51.600 would also be
01:11:52.460 against the pardon.
01:11:54.560 Yeah,
01:11:55.060 I guess it's a little
01:11:55.860 more complicated
01:11:56.500 than I first thought.
01:11:57.780 But,
01:11:58.120 if you're a Republican,
01:11:59.160 I would not fight
01:12:00.280 the January 6th pardons.
01:12:01.800 I would roll over
01:12:02.940 and find something else
01:12:03.960 to worry about.
01:12:06.260 Trump has a new proposal.
01:12:08.520 He wants businesses
01:12:09.640 that invest
01:12:10.220 over a billion dollars
01:12:11.200 in the U.S.
01:12:12.360 He wants them
01:12:12.960 to receive expedited
01:12:15.040 approvals and permits.
01:12:17.160 Now,
01:12:18.220 how big a deal
01:12:19.640 is that?
01:12:21.920 It's really big.
01:12:23.960 And,
01:12:24.500 have you seen
01:12:25.540 the stats
01:12:26.180 on how many
01:12:27.520 billion dollar companies
01:12:28.800 have been created
01:12:29.660 in the United States
01:12:30.920 in the last
01:12:31.880 few decades
01:12:32.960 versus how many
01:12:34.340 have been created
01:12:35.140 in Europe?
01:12:37.000 So,
01:12:37.560 in the United States,
01:12:38.780 I don't know
01:12:39.180 what the number is,
01:12:40.040 50 or whatever,
01:12:41.260 but quite a few.
01:12:42.860 Quite a few.
01:12:44.340 The number in Europe
01:12:45.120 is none.
01:12:46.800 None.
01:12:48.620 In decades,
01:12:50.060 they haven't created
01:12:50.680 a new billion dollar business
01:12:51.920 in Europe.
01:12:52.360 None.
01:12:54.020 Now,
01:12:54.800 why?
01:12:56.320 Well,
01:12:56.860 why is probably
01:12:58.080 red tape
01:12:58.940 in tradition,
01:13:00.100 some of it's cultural,
01:13:01.920 but a lot of it
01:13:03.380 probably is just
01:13:04.100 the red tape.
01:13:05.120 It's just hard
01:13:05.700 to get anything going.
01:13:06.700 In Europe,
01:13:07.240 it's harder.
01:13:08.620 So,
01:13:09.160 Trump's instinct
01:13:10.060 to reduce regulations
01:13:11.800 to make it easier
01:13:12.640 to do business
01:13:13.380 is right on.
01:13:14.500 I've told you before
01:13:15.440 that I've had
01:13:16.160 numerous
01:13:17.820 small business ideas
01:13:20.120 for California.
01:13:22.980 For example,
01:13:23.700 I would love to open
01:13:24.700 a cat petting cafe,
01:13:26.320 but it's California.
01:13:31.840 So,
01:13:32.360 I'd go,
01:13:32.700 oh,
01:13:33.100 it's California.
01:13:33.900 There's no point in it
01:13:34.780 because California
01:13:36.720 would make me,
01:13:37.720 you know,
01:13:38.040 try to preserve
01:13:38.820 some endangered frogs
01:13:40.780 and I would have
01:13:42.080 to guarantee
01:13:42.580 that I hired,
01:13:43.580 you know,
01:13:44.220 diverse employees
01:13:45.240 and,
01:13:46.260 you know,
01:13:46.380 I would get sued
01:13:47.240 for who knows what
01:13:48.980 and,
01:13:49.820 you know,
01:13:49.960 the power would go out.
01:13:52.160 California is not
01:13:53.080 really suitable
01:13:53.800 for starting a business
01:13:55.000 at the moment.
01:13:55.820 Not a small business.
01:13:56.960 I don't know,
01:13:57.280 maybe a bigger one
01:13:57.980 would make sense.
01:13:59.420 But,
01:14:00.440 so when he says
01:14:03.000 that he will,
01:14:04.360 if you bring
01:14:05.180 a billion dollars
01:14:05.940 into the country,
01:14:07.340 he'll expedite
01:14:07.980 the approvals
01:14:08.500 and permits,
01:14:09.240 that's a really big deal.
01:14:11.640 And,
01:14:12.080 here's the thing
01:14:13.540 that nobody said
01:14:14.620 when Trump said this.
01:14:18.580 Nobody said,
01:14:19.760 you're not the president.
01:14:22.740 So,
01:14:23.320 he's not even the president
01:14:24.200 but he puts out,
01:14:26.040 he puts out this proposal
01:14:27.740 as if president.
01:14:30.480 And,
01:14:31.120 and I think everybody treats it
01:14:32.560 as though he said it
01:14:33.720 as president.
01:14:34.980 Which they should.
01:14:36.560 Common sense.
01:14:37.580 Common sense says
01:14:38.480 the real president's,
01:14:40.380 you know,
01:14:40.640 disabled.
01:14:42.020 And if we have somebody
01:14:43.180 who can step in
01:14:44.140 who's legitimate
01:14:44.880 because he did get
01:14:45.940 most of the votes,
01:14:47.440 yeah,
01:14:48.060 act like a president.
01:14:49.400 So,
01:14:49.780 the fact that he does this
01:14:50.740 without an apology,
01:14:52.540 you know,
01:14:52.680 he doesn't add anything like,
01:14:54.180 you know,
01:14:54.460 once I'm sworn in,
01:14:56.440 you know,
01:14:56.660 he doesn't have to do
01:14:57.400 any of that.
01:14:58.320 He just says what he's
01:14:59.500 going to do.
01:15:00.480 And then,
01:15:01.740 it's done.
01:15:02.620 I mean,
01:15:02.900 you could argue
01:15:03.560 that he implemented it already.
01:15:06.780 Because if what he's offering
01:15:08.380 is expediting approvals
01:15:10.120 and permits,
01:15:10.940 he doesn't need to pass
01:15:12.080 a new law.
01:15:13.240 Probably.
01:15:14.500 He doesn't have to get
01:15:15.740 anybody's permission.
01:15:17.580 Probably.
01:15:18.960 Probably if just some
01:15:20.000 big billion dollar company
01:15:21.200 wanted to do this,
01:15:22.160 they would just contact him
01:15:23.340 or Elon Musk
01:15:24.180 who could contact him.
01:15:25.240 They'd get to him somehow.
01:15:26.460 And then Trump would say,
01:15:27.740 what is it you want to build?
01:15:29.200 A chip factory.
01:15:31.060 Absolutely.
01:15:32.080 I'll have my people
01:15:33.180 remove all the
01:15:34.260 stupid regulations
01:15:35.560 and get you right in business.
01:15:37.780 Because I think,
01:15:38.420 I think the chip manufacturing
01:15:39.720 is
01:15:40.120 maybe largely
01:15:41.960 what he has in mind.
01:15:43.260 Because you don't want
01:15:44.060 to have too much red tape.
01:15:45.120 Otherwise,
01:15:45.560 we'll fall behind
01:15:46.640 any AI.
01:15:47.720 And we'll all be dead.
01:15:51.160 Meanwhile,
01:15:51.800 in Argentina,
01:15:52.720 a story which
01:15:53.560 I feel is fishy.
01:15:56.020 you know those
01:15:58.520 things that are
01:15:59.620 too good to be true
01:16:00.660 are a little too
01:16:01.960 on the nose,
01:16:03.380 a little too perfect.
01:16:05.800 Well,
01:16:06.320 so as you know,
01:16:07.680 Argentina's new
01:16:08.680 president,
01:16:09.740 Millet,
01:16:10.700 is a
01:16:11.740 ex-economist.
01:16:13.820 And he had
01:16:14.600 very,
01:16:15.140 very big claims
01:16:15.940 about what he was
01:16:16.760 going to do
01:16:17.100 to turn around
01:16:17.760 Argentina
01:16:18.340 and he was going
01:16:19.020 to do it fast.
01:16:20.340 And so today,
01:16:21.000 the news is saying
01:16:21.800 that Argentina
01:16:23.660 has completely
01:16:24.480 removed the deficit
01:16:25.600 meaning that
01:16:26.420 the government
01:16:26.880 is bringing in
01:16:27.720 more revenue
01:16:28.560 than it's spending.
01:16:30.160 And he said
01:16:30.620 with no debt,
01:16:32.460 says there's,
01:16:33.760 yeah,
01:16:34.380 no inflation.
01:16:36.280 So suddenly,
01:16:37.320 Argentina is looking
01:16:39.060 like a great economy
01:16:40.160 or the beginning
01:16:41.160 of a great economy.
01:16:42.680 And he says
01:16:44.180 Argentina will become
01:16:45.160 the AI
01:16:45.880 and nuclear powerhouse,
01:16:48.200 which is exactly
01:16:49.620 the smart thing
01:16:50.520 you'd want
01:16:51.040 your president
01:16:51.880 to say
01:16:52.380 if he were
01:16:52.800 the president
01:16:53.220 of Argentina.
01:16:54.640 So here's
01:16:55.280 my problem.
01:16:57.060 Is this a little
01:16:57.780 too good?
01:16:59.980 Do you believe
01:17:00.500 this?
01:17:02.060 Do you believe
01:17:02.920 that the economists
01:17:04.240 came in
01:17:04.920 and completely
01:17:06.100 turned the country
01:17:06.940 around in one year?
01:17:09.540 Does that sound
01:17:10.760 real to you?
01:17:13.400 I'd love to think
01:17:14.440 it was.
01:17:15.720 Like,
01:17:16.080 in my perfect world,
01:17:17.120 this is completely
01:17:17.780 real,
01:17:18.380 because it suggests
01:17:19.340 we could do
01:17:19.880 something like it.
01:17:21.660 But the question
01:17:22.460 I would have is,
01:17:23.420 did Argentina
01:17:24.100 not have a bunch
01:17:25.280 of welfare,
01:17:27.720 health care expenses
01:17:29.180 that they couldn't cut?
01:17:30.920 Or did he cut
01:17:32.060 things that they
01:17:32.840 shouldn't have cut
01:17:33.640 and that the real story
01:17:35.220 is that the poor
01:17:36.240 are all going to
01:17:36.960 starve to death
01:17:37.660 because the only way
01:17:38.880 the government
01:17:39.360 could cut their costs
01:17:40.440 to get rid of the deficit
01:17:41.960 is to stop helping
01:17:43.660 people in need?
01:17:45.360 Are we going to
01:17:46.120 find that out?
01:17:47.800 This is one of those
01:17:48.740 stories where only
01:17:49.520 the good side
01:17:50.280 is shown.
01:17:51.540 Oh, great,
01:17:52.500 you got rid of
01:17:53.060 the deficit.
01:17:54.960 Did anything else
01:17:56.220 happen?
01:17:57.820 Such as,
01:17:59.340 I don't know,
01:18:02.540 poor people dying
01:18:03.860 in mass because
01:18:05.100 the government
01:18:06.180 isn't helping them
01:18:06.920 anymore?
01:18:08.040 Like, what are you
01:18:08.660 giving up?
01:18:09.840 Is there more crime
01:18:11.140 because you had to
01:18:12.420 cut the police force?
01:18:13.840 I don't know.
01:18:15.280 So,
01:18:15.900 I'm just going to say
01:18:16.940 that this story
01:18:17.620 smells wrong.
01:18:18.640 I sure hope
01:18:20.120 it's true
01:18:20.620 because I would
01:18:21.740 love for Argentina
01:18:22.460 to do well.
01:18:24.380 I would love
01:18:25.160 that somebody
01:18:26.420 with an economics
01:18:27.280 background
01:18:27.860 did well.
01:18:29.640 By the way,
01:18:30.260 that was true
01:18:30.760 in India, right?
01:18:31.800 Isn't Modi
01:18:32.600 an economist?
01:18:35.640 I don't know
01:18:36.340 too much about
01:18:36.920 the Indian system,
01:18:38.660 but I think
01:18:39.000 Modi is an economist,
01:18:40.200 right?
01:18:40.400 So,
01:18:42.600 here's my second
01:18:44.000 question.
01:18:45.360 I would like to
01:18:46.120 know the history
01:18:46.920 of economists
01:18:48.180 who rose to
01:18:49.440 the top office
01:18:50.280 and how often
01:18:51.620 that made a
01:18:52.200 difference.
01:18:54.700 Wouldn't it be
01:18:55.460 fun to find out
01:18:56.420 that, let's say,
01:18:57.460 it only happened
01:18:58.020 five times in
01:18:58.900 history and all
01:19:00.160 five times the
01:19:00.900 country completely
01:19:01.620 turned around in
01:19:02.400 a year?
01:19:02.880 Because I think
01:19:03.500 India had kind
01:19:04.880 of an economic
01:19:05.460 miracle with
01:19:06.240 an economist in
01:19:07.260 charge, right?
01:19:07.740 I don't know
01:19:09.640 enough about
01:19:10.060 India to know
01:19:10.640 that that's true,
01:19:11.840 but I kind of
01:19:13.600 vaguely think
01:19:14.160 that's true.
01:19:15.880 So, give me a
01:19:16.460 fact check in
01:19:17.020 the comments if
01:19:17.820 you know more
01:19:18.240 about the
01:19:18.780 Indian system.
01:19:21.520 Meanwhile,
01:19:22.280 the representative
01:19:23.480 Jamal Bowman,
01:19:24.820 who's no longer
01:19:25.460 representative,
01:19:26.180 he was ousted
01:19:26.880 in New York,
01:19:28.320 he did some
01:19:29.720 kind of open
01:19:30.340 letter,
01:19:31.560 which he said,
01:19:32.500 dear white
01:19:33.000 people,
01:19:33.700 that's a bad
01:19:35.140 start,
01:19:36.040 dear white
01:19:36.620 people,
01:19:37.740 okay,
01:19:38.440 where's this
01:19:38.920 going?
01:19:41.360 And he's
01:19:42.060 mad about the
01:19:42.780 Penny verdict,
01:19:43.980 Jamal Bowman
01:19:44.600 is.
01:19:45.320 He says,
01:19:45.880 don't know why
01:19:46.580 I feel the
01:19:47.000 need to keep
01:19:47.500 talking to
01:19:47.980 you,
01:19:48.380 meaning to
01:19:48.940 white people.
01:19:51.260 And he
01:19:51.880 said on
01:19:53.500 Tuesday that,
01:19:54.400 quote,
01:19:54.520 white supremacy
01:19:55.320 is the reason
01:19:56.120 Daniel Penny
01:19:56.740 was acquitted.
01:19:59.540 Oh,
01:20:00.080 my goodness.
01:20:02.140 And he
01:20:02.700 said he
01:20:02.980 doesn't
01:20:03.260 understand why
01:20:04.100 people feel
01:20:04.900 the need to
01:20:05.420 keep talking
01:20:05.940 to white
01:20:06.360 people.
01:20:07.740 well,
01:20:09.940 Jamal,
01:20:10.900 this might
01:20:12.080 have something
01:20:12.680 to do with
01:20:13.220 why you're
01:20:13.640 ousted.
01:20:15.180 So he's
01:20:15.980 doubling down
01:20:16.780 on identity
01:20:17.480 politics.
01:20:19.160 And I was
01:20:19.620 watching,
01:20:20.120 oh,
01:20:22.220 Dan Abrams,
01:20:23.380 I think he's
01:20:23.920 on News
01:20:24.320 Nation now,
01:20:25.360 used to be
01:20:25.800 on MSNBC,
01:20:26.840 if that's
01:20:27.200 correct.
01:20:28.400 And he was
01:20:28.960 talking to a
01:20:29.700 Black Lives
01:20:30.240 Matter leader
01:20:31.900 who was
01:20:32.580 saying that
01:20:33.040 the Daniel
01:20:34.080 Penny thing
01:20:34.580 was pure
01:20:35.320 racism.
01:20:37.380 And Abrams
01:20:38.020 was,
01:20:39.060 who I
01:20:39.540 believe is
01:20:41.000 a Democrat,
01:20:42.440 he was
01:20:43.000 just no.
01:20:45.160 He was a
01:20:46.100 hard no
01:20:46.740 on the
01:20:47.660 Penny situation
01:20:48.460 being about
01:20:49.000 race.
01:20:49.960 I really
01:20:50.340 appreciated that.
01:20:51.860 Now,
01:20:52.260 I'll need a
01:20:52.960 confirmation.
01:20:53.760 He does,
01:20:55.280 doesn't he
01:20:55.880 side Democrat?
01:20:57.060 He's not
01:21:00.060 an extremist,
01:21:00.760 but I
01:21:00.960 thought he
01:21:01.200 was always
01:21:01.700 friendly to
01:21:03.220 the left
01:21:03.600 in terms
01:21:04.040 of politics.
01:21:05.160 So if you
01:21:05.480 could get
01:21:05.760 somebody like
01:21:06.300 Dan Abrams,
01:21:07.900 who's friendly
01:21:08.620 to the left
01:21:09.160 on politics,
01:21:09.780 to say,
01:21:10.620 this Daniel
01:21:11.080 Penny situation,
01:21:12.580 nope,
01:21:13.380 nope,
01:21:14.120 absolutely not.
01:21:15.000 That is not
01:21:15.720 about racism.
01:21:18.300 And I
01:21:18.680 agree.
01:21:21.420 Meanwhile,
01:21:22.200 there's
01:21:22.560 talk that
01:21:24.280 Laura Trump,
01:21:25.220 who is now
01:21:25.620 stepping down
01:21:26.400 as the RNC
01:21:27.360 co-chair,
01:21:28.880 might be
01:21:29.420 considering a
01:21:30.120 Senate seat
01:21:30.660 to replace
01:21:31.320 Rubio.
01:21:33.300 What would
01:21:34.000 you think
01:21:34.360 of Laura
01:21:34.900 Trump as
01:21:35.960 a Florida
01:21:36.700 senator?
01:21:40.380 I will
01:21:41.160 not wait
01:21:41.760 for your
01:21:42.060 answers,
01:21:42.860 and I will
01:21:43.320 tell you
01:21:43.700 the answer.
01:21:44.960 I like
01:21:45.460 it.
01:21:46.160 I like
01:21:46.920 it a lot.
01:21:48.640 And again,
01:21:49.260 I've had
01:21:49.740 some interactions
01:21:51.760 with her
01:21:52.360 on interviews.
01:21:53.620 She's interviewed
01:21:54.080 me a few
01:21:54.540 times on
01:21:55.160 video.
01:21:57.480 And
01:21:57.940 I'll tell
01:21:59.520 you the one
01:21:59.920 thing you
01:22:00.340 get from
01:22:00.800 her,
01:22:01.360 like loud
01:22:02.060 and clear,
01:22:02.900 is she
01:22:03.680 projects
01:22:04.400 competence.
01:22:07.540 Like,
01:22:08.060 you just
01:22:08.360 feel it.
01:22:09.740 So she's
01:22:10.280 got the
01:22:10.760 charisma,
01:22:12.260 the fight,
01:22:14.200 the connections,
01:22:15.700 the competence,
01:22:16.340 and to
01:22:18.620 Donald Trump's
01:22:20.480 point of
01:22:21.940 view,
01:22:22.980 she's
01:22:23.480 perfect on
01:22:24.260 camera.
01:22:24.920 The camera
01:22:25.240 loves her.
01:22:26.440 So if you
01:22:27.160 have,
01:22:27.840 and her
01:22:28.440 physicality,
01:22:29.340 I don't think
01:22:29.800 can be
01:22:30.080 ignored.
01:22:31.200 If you've
01:22:32.280 never seen
01:22:32.740 her workout
01:22:33.340 routine on
01:22:34.080 her Instagram
01:22:34.580 posts,
01:22:35.620 oh my
01:22:35.980 God,
01:22:37.320 she really
01:22:38.100 takes exercise
01:22:38.920 and fitness
01:22:39.860 to a level
01:22:40.500 that is
01:22:41.640 inspiring,
01:22:43.120 actually.
01:22:43.520 It's just
01:22:43.860 inspiring.
01:22:45.220 So does
01:22:46.620 she have
01:22:46.900 the tools
01:22:47.500 to be a
01:22:49.720 senator?
01:22:50.500 I'm going
01:22:51.040 to say
01:22:51.280 hard yes.
01:22:53.060 I'd be
01:22:53.660 pretty happy
01:22:54.100 with that.
01:22:55.480 So if
01:22:56.680 you had to
01:22:57.040 predict,
01:22:57.740 I would
01:22:58.100 predict that
01:22:58.760 she will
01:22:59.100 be a
01:22:59.440 senator.
01:23:00.760 We'll
01:23:00.980 see.
01:23:03.880 Elon
01:23:04.400 Musk
01:23:04.760 apparently
01:23:05.220 set a
01:23:06.600 new record
01:23:07.080 for richness,
01:23:08.260 so he
01:23:08.800 crossed the
01:23:09.360 400 billion
01:23:10.260 mark.
01:23:11.620 He's in
01:23:12.140 the mid
01:23:12.460 400 billion
01:23:13.600 range of
01:23:14.980 richness.
01:23:15.980 Now,
01:23:16.300 I'm not
01:23:16.580 the first
01:23:16.960 person to
01:23:17.560 predict this,
01:23:18.400 but I
01:23:19.400 think he's
01:23:19.900 only two
01:23:20.400 years from
01:23:20.940 the first
01:23:21.340 trillionaire.
01:23:23.280 First
01:23:23.840 trillionaire.
01:23:24.900 Because I
01:23:25.660 think when
01:23:26.040 the robots
01:23:26.900 go online
01:23:27.680 and his
01:23:29.140 robo-taxies
01:23:30.540 go online
01:23:32.220 and he's
01:23:33.160 part of the
01:23:33.580 Trump
01:23:33.820 administration,
01:23:34.760 so those,
01:23:35.540 let's say,
01:23:36.360 those things
01:23:36.860 holding him
01:23:37.420 back,
01:23:38.380 regulations
01:23:39.040 and red
01:23:39.560 tape and
01:23:40.180 lawfare and
01:23:41.360 all that,
01:23:41.740 if those
01:23:42.100 things are
01:23:42.480 removed,
01:23:43.600 which are
01:23:44.140 his biggest
01:23:44.520 problem,
01:23:45.340 weirdly,
01:23:46.520 it's not
01:23:48.100 going to
01:23:48.300 take him
01:23:48.640 long to
01:23:49.100 get to
01:23:49.380 a trillion
01:23:49.820 because you
01:23:51.200 could easily
01:23:51.680 see the
01:23:52.140 value of
01:23:52.700 Tesla doubling,
01:23:54.460 right?
01:23:55.300 You could
01:23:55.880 imagine Tesla
01:23:56.540 doubling in
01:23:57.120 value in two
01:23:57.660 years with
01:23:58.120 the robots,
01:23:59.520 even maybe
01:24:01.660 just with the
01:24:02.180 cars alone,
01:24:02.840 but you add
01:24:03.320 the robots
01:24:03.800 in for sure,
01:24:04.820 and then you
01:24:05.300 add the
01:24:06.400 self-driving
01:24:07.560 taxis.
01:24:08.180 I mean,
01:24:09.960 that's got to
01:24:11.100 be worth a
01:24:11.520 few hundred
01:24:11.840 billion right
01:24:12.400 there.
01:24:13.600 So yeah,
01:24:14.100 I think two
01:24:14.920 years,
01:24:15.980 two years
01:24:17.120 until he's
01:24:17.640 the first
01:24:17.960 trillionaire.
01:24:19.660 That's kind
01:24:20.340 of cool.
01:24:22.160 If somebody
01:24:22.960 had to be a
01:24:23.500 trillionaire,
01:24:25.700 are you glad
01:24:26.360 it's him?
01:24:28.100 Like,
01:24:28.360 try to do
01:24:29.640 this exercise
01:24:30.380 in your mind.
01:24:31.940 Try to come
01:24:32.500 up with one
01:24:33.240 other person
01:24:33.960 in the
01:24:34.880 United States
01:24:35.660 that you
01:24:36.660 would be as
01:24:37.400 happy if
01:24:38.560 they became
01:24:39.000 a trillionaire.
01:24:40.300 Name
01:24:40.520 anybody.
01:24:42.940 But he
01:24:44.340 clearly puts
01:24:45.800 so much
01:24:46.280 blood,
01:24:46.820 sweat,
01:24:47.100 and tears
01:24:47.560 into the
01:24:48.380 benefit of
01:24:49.280 the United
01:24:49.620 States,
01:24:50.220 not just
01:24:50.700 now,
01:24:51.140 but in
01:24:52.400 the long
01:24:52.760 future,
01:24:53.500 and the
01:24:54.080 benefit of
01:24:54.520 the world,
01:24:55.820 and making
01:24:56.660 us
01:24:56.960 multi-planetary
01:24:58.120 and God
01:24:59.740 knows what
01:25:00.120 else.
01:25:00.800 I don't
01:25:01.360 think anybody
01:25:02.140 in the
01:25:02.620 history of
01:25:03.460 anything has
01:25:05.520 ever been
01:25:07.040 so clearly
01:25:07.920 somebody that
01:25:08.980 I would
01:25:09.680 say,
01:25:10.160 a trillion?
01:25:12.000 Go for
01:25:12.660 three.
01:25:13.960 You can
01:25:14.380 have as
01:25:14.640 many trillions
01:25:15.200 as you
01:25:15.600 want.
01:25:16.360 You just
01:25:16.680 keep being
01:25:17.140 you,
01:25:18.320 and keep
01:25:18.760 giving back
01:25:20.620 to the
01:25:21.060 stockholders
01:25:21.640 and giving
01:25:22.080 back to the
01:25:22.560 country and
01:25:23.060 the world,
01:25:24.000 and yeah,
01:25:24.500 we're all
01:25:24.780 good.
01:25:26.640 And then
01:25:27.300 the other
01:25:27.560 thing you
01:25:27.800 have to
01:25:28.020 realize is
01:25:28.460 that Musk
01:25:30.040 with a
01:25:30.440 trillion
01:25:30.720 dollars can
01:25:32.640 do more
01:25:33.140 things like
01:25:33.880 buying old
01:25:35.280 Twitter and
01:25:36.040 saving free
01:25:37.000 speech.
01:25:38.700 So that
01:25:39.260 was worth
01:25:39.700 a trillion
01:25:40.140 dollars.
01:25:41.580 And remember,
01:25:42.080 the trillions
01:25:42.560 that he
01:25:42.920 makes probably
01:25:44.020 just go back
01:25:44.700 into productive
01:25:45.540 investments.
01:25:47.400 He doesn't
01:25:47.740 keep money
01:25:49.000 in a pillow.
01:25:50.780 He doesn't
01:25:51.180 put money
01:25:51.600 in his
01:25:52.000 mattress.
01:25:53.580 He reinvests,
01:25:54.700 and he reinvests
01:25:55.420 at least two
01:25:56.660 or three times
01:25:57.280 he's reinvested
01:25:58.080 in everything
01:25:58.440 he had.
01:25:58.900 So he's
01:26:01.360 all in
01:26:01.980 on America.
01:26:03.600 And if
01:26:04.000 you're all
01:26:04.460 in on
01:26:04.780 America and
01:26:05.340 you prove
01:26:05.720 it every
01:26:06.020 day and
01:26:06.420 you're working
01:26:06.760 120 hours
01:26:07.680 a week and
01:26:08.760 it seems
01:26:09.100 like it
01:26:09.400 takes three
01:26:09.860 of you to
01:26:10.300 do what
01:26:10.560 you're doing
01:26:10.920 and you
01:26:11.840 don't have
01:26:12.320 to do
01:26:12.620 any of
01:26:12.900 it,
01:26:13.640 you don't
01:26:14.020 have to
01:26:14.460 do any
01:26:14.860 of it,
01:26:15.780 yeah,
01:26:16.460 you can
01:26:16.840 have a
01:26:17.120 trillion.
01:26:17.740 You can
01:26:18.160 have as
01:26:18.420 many
01:26:18.660 trillions
01:26:19.020 as you
01:26:19.420 want.
01:26:19.720 That's
01:26:19.900 fine with
01:26:20.260 me.
01:26:22.060 All right,
01:26:22.660 ladies and
01:26:23.340 gentlemen,
01:26:23.680 that's
01:26:26.080 all I
01:26:26.340 have for
01:26:26.800 my
01:26:27.660 prepared
01:26:28.000 remarks.
01:26:28.600 It went
01:26:28.780 on too
01:26:29.100 long.
01:26:29.480 I'm going
01:26:29.700 to say
01:26:30.440 bye and
01:26:30.980 say hi to
01:26:31.660 the fine
01:26:33.800 folks who
01:26:34.500 are at
01:26:34.820 Locals.
01:26:35.760 But if
01:26:36.040 you're on
01:26:36.340 Rumble or
01:26:36.940 X or
01:26:37.380 YouTube,
01:26:37.880 thanks for
01:26:38.220 joining.
01:26:38.720 I will see
01:26:39.060 you tomorrow,
01:26:39.640 same time,
01:26:40.080 same place.