Episode 2712 CWSA 01⧸06⧸25
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 28 minutes
Words per Minute
150.93188
Summary
JANUARY 6th is the anniversary of the protest that took place in the streets of DC on Jan. 6th, 2019. Science and politics are celebrating the day, and so are we!
Transcript
00:00:00.000
old america is looking stronger than i've seen it in a long time so there's that but if you'd like
00:00:09.620
to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human
00:00:15.120
brains all you need for that is a cup of mug or a glass of tanker chalice a stein a canteen jug
00:00:19.400
or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for
00:00:25.960
the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better
00:00:30.780
it's called the simultaneous sip it happens now go
00:00:34.660
oh that's good that's some good stuff right there
00:00:41.960
well i didn't get you a gift for january 6th but i feel like we can still celebrate can't we
00:00:50.660
that's a good day well i've got some science stories we've got some political stories we've
00:00:56.420
got some january 6th stuff and some trump effects stuff but uh here's a starting with a little bit
00:01:03.260
of a study um according to side post written by vladimir hedry testosterone spikes are linked to
00:01:12.240
stronger political opinions in men that's right when men have higher testosterone
00:01:19.340
their political opinions harden and they get more you know more certain and more forceful
00:01:25.860
now could they have saved money by doing something where they could get the same answer
00:01:32.380
but they wouldn't have to do this study well they could have just asked me because that's pretty much
00:01:41.220
what testosterone is if somebody said what's testosterone scott i'd say well you know has
00:01:48.980
a variety of benefits to your your health but in terms of what it's going to do to you it's going
00:01:53.820
to make your opinions more forceful and you're gonna chase them harder i thought everybody already knew
00:02:00.360
that did we really need to do that in the study well i don't know i'll bet you if you measured the
00:02:07.640
testosterone of the january 6 protesters during the height of the protest i'll bet you would have found
00:02:14.480
their testosterone was pretty high i bet you would and i'll bet if you measured them while they're in
00:02:20.260
prison except for today they might be happy today um it probably would have been lower so winning
00:02:26.880
makes your testosterone higher higher testosterone makes you more confident we knew all of these
00:02:33.820
things but let's talk about the rasmussen poll that said 48 of uh i think it was likely voters
00:02:40.440
say biden is one of the worst presidents ever 48 let's call it half now i suppose democrats said the
00:02:51.460
same thing about trump after you know the first term but that's pretty bad that's pretty bad
00:02:59.900
all right let's talk about uh let's talk about january 6th kyle cheney is posting on x that uh
00:03:09.140
the department of justice revealed that it declined uh 400 cases that the fbi recommended
00:03:17.340
for protesters at january 6th the original to be charged the department of justice said no to 400
00:03:29.860
extra ones that the fbi thought should be charged when their only crime was entering the restricted
00:03:37.240
perimeter their only crime was entering the restricted perimeter when the gates were torn down
00:03:46.760
and the fbi tried to get 400 of them into the legal system through that well thank goodness the
00:03:57.320
department of justice said that's too far um and and i think molly molly hemingway is pointing out
00:04:06.340
that the fbi is obsessed by this don't you want to know who in the fbi was in charge
00:04:13.920
of recommending that these 400 people be be destroyed by the department of justice
00:04:20.480
so much so that the department of justice said ah no we're not even going to do that
00:04:26.960
we have questions who exactly thought that was a good idea because whoever you are to me that sounds
00:04:36.760
like it was completely political i mean that 400 people remember i told you that republicans would
00:04:44.720
be hunted well i don't think it's more obvious than 400 people that the department of justice couldn't
00:04:50.720
even bring it down themselves to charge them so yeah fbi you got a big problem
00:04:57.960
um as you know biden gave one of the i think it's the nation's highest award to a civilian
00:05:05.960
and included liz cheney who who was on that select committee january 6 select committee
00:05:12.960
and uh remember that she hid exculpatory evidence about trump
00:05:19.180
and remember she she did something like witness tampering this molly emingway was talking about
00:05:27.020
this as well on x and is that illegal is it illegal if you're just on some january 6 select committee
00:05:35.180
is it illegal to tamper with a witness i mean it would be if it were a legal trial
00:05:42.260
but is it illegal if it's a political process i don't know um hiding exculpatory evidence again i
00:05:50.800
don't know if that's illegal but if it if it had a big impact on the country it's as bad as you can
00:05:58.780
imagine it's pretty bad so anyway my biggest question about this is i'm wondering if liz cheney will end up
00:06:08.660
in one of the same cells that the january sixers are in right now you know the female january sixers
00:06:15.340
that could actually happen because i don't know if what she's done is jailable
00:06:22.700
but it's in the category of things you think should be jailable i just don't know if the the law would
00:06:28.740
agree with me and if she ended up in jail and the january sixers were released there's at least a pretty
00:06:35.880
good chance that they would fill one of the empty she would fill one of the empty prison cells
00:06:40.440
so i don't know maybe she'll be in one of those jails we'll see anyway trump says he's expecting to grant
00:06:50.720
clemency to over a thousand of those january sixers now keep in mind i think there are fourteen of them
00:06:57.820
fourteen hundred of them he said uh over a thousand so we don't know how many now the other thing that
00:07:05.120
somebody asked is clemency is that as good as a pardon because otherwise if it keeps them with a
00:07:11.440
criminal record people are saying hey clemency is not as good as a pardon but did you know
00:07:16.520
that a pardon is just a subset of clemency so clemency doesn't tell you exactly
00:07:22.860
what the order would look like that's just an umbrella so it could be a pardon we just don't know
00:07:30.900
well you know i think it's a start but if you're looking at the extremes most of us would agree
00:07:41.040
that at least a thousand of them didn't do anything worthy of jail so those are the easy ones but what
00:07:46.460
about the hardcore ones what about the ones who genuinely look like they were in there to do some
00:07:52.820
danger uh nancy pelosi reminds us that uh at least a few of the january sixers were talking out loud
00:08:02.000
about finding nancy pelosi and doing damage so she points out as i would point out if i were in a
00:08:10.660
position that no if they had not been stopped or she had not been protected that she could have been
00:08:16.500
badly injured now i don't know if that's true because it's possible that the protesters were
00:08:22.600
just full of talk and even if they had the chance probably wouldn't have done it but i don't know
00:08:29.280
and if and if i were her i would certainly think that they might have i wouldn't take it i wouldn't
00:08:34.760
take it as hyperbole if it were happening to me so could there be somebody who are people who are at
00:08:41.560
that extreme they should be kept in jail i'm gonna say no they should not be kept in jail
00:08:51.140
because this is the special case of all special cases if it were just a case of some people did
00:08:58.060
some dangerous stuff i'd say well you know they broke the law so jail but what did they think they
00:09:06.980
were doing what they thought they were doing is saving the country from what looked to them
00:09:13.120
like an obvious rigged election and the end of democracy in the united states basically
00:09:19.000
so they were doing what the you know the tea party the real tea party back in the beginning of the
00:09:27.000
country so they were doing what the patriots and the founding of the country were doing they were
00:09:33.700
applying some potential or actual violence to a situation in which they thought their country had
00:09:39.720
been was being stolen from them or they were being abused by the government
00:09:43.100
now the fact that some people might argue that they were wrong doesn't make them wrong
00:09:52.440
meaning that they may have accurately identified a fake a rigged election and they may have
00:09:58.740
accurately identified who was behind it and if the penalty for rigging an extreme you know rigging an
00:10:07.400
election and being behind it was that it increases your physical risk that's not really a situation i
00:10:16.460
want to stop you know what i mean so certainly i'm not in favor of violence but if somebody wants to
00:10:24.500
react in a militant way because they saw something happen to the country that is a complete destruction
00:10:31.880
of the country i'm not sure that that's exactly like going on the offensive to me that looked like
00:10:40.100
self-defense and national defense i don't recommend it i wouldn't want to see it again but the people
00:10:47.860
involved were trying to save the country not destroy it that's got to count for something
00:10:53.460
were they wrong to do what they want it's a separate question but i would ignore it i would
00:11:00.000
ignore whether or not they made good decisions and i would just say were they baited into a situation
00:11:07.340
that definitely looked like the country had been stolen and were they acting in a way that would be
00:11:14.340
appropriate if they'd been correct and i think the answer is if they'd been correct
00:11:20.660
and they might have been um then it wasn't that bad you you could understand it in a completely
00:11:30.020
different context so what she's trying to get away with nancy pelosi is trying to get away with making
00:11:37.060
you think past the sale that it was a perfectly good election in which case i would say they should all
00:11:43.740
go to jail if somehow they knew it was a good election and they did what they did anyway well
00:11:50.360
yeah yeah you go to jail for that but if they genuinely believed what at least half the country
00:11:56.780
probably thought that the entire system had been rigged and had been stolen from them and they just
00:12:01.820
lost america yeah expect some people to act in a pretty aggressive way and if it happens again
00:12:09.220
i don't recommend violence but you should expect it you should at least expect it you'd be creating
00:12:16.120
the situation that pretty much invites it so if you create a situation where you have not protected
00:12:21.900
our elections to the point where the public can even tell if they were fair you've got to take that
00:12:27.900
responsibility on yourself nancy pelosi and everybody else who is in in in office if you can't give us an
00:12:35.040
election that even looks fair whether it was or not if it doesn't look fair you did not do your job
00:12:42.480
or even close and there's going to be reaction to that don't recommend it but there's going to be reaction
00:12:48.300
well meanwhile trump is uh the master of the fast start strategy where you make sure that your first
00:12:59.460
days in office or even before office as he's doing now that he he comes in and makes a big splash
00:13:05.580
this is exactly the right thing a leader should do they should make it look like things are happening
00:13:11.480
fast and everything's going right and the first week is amazing because that makes it easy to do
00:13:17.180
everything else if the rest of the country can say wow your first week on the job or even the first
00:13:23.660
month before you were on the job you're already killing it then it weakens people's resistance
00:13:30.100
because i say wow he seems to be getting things done and people like it i guess i'll be part of that
00:13:37.020
so the persuasive power of the fast start strategy is amazing it's like a first impression kind of thing
00:13:45.240
that you can't shake later so trump is the best in the game at this specific thing the fast start
00:13:52.920
i've never seen anybody in even slightly even slightly in the same category as him
00:14:02.080
but what he wants to do he says is uh secure the border uh renew the tax trump cuts the ones that
00:14:12.100
were going to expire and uh no tax on tips but it does open the question of is he going to put that
00:14:19.380
all in one big bill where you have to vote for all of it or none of it because then i wonder what
00:14:25.400
happens with thomas massey and me who don't like the omnibus bills are they going to just shove it
00:14:33.280
all together and i don't know so i guess that's an open question um p hegseth apparently will have the
00:14:43.180
votes hasn't happened yet but he will have the votes to be confirmed as secretary of defense
00:14:48.520
uh majority leader thune says that he has the vote so i'm sure he would know so is that the trump effect
00:14:56.820
do you think you're seeing the trump effect there i think so because ag seth had some issues
00:15:05.260
right he had some accusations which by the way he didn't you know most of them he didn't run away from
00:15:11.980
you know he said he's got a he's got a past he kind of owned up to it um and he doesn't have
00:15:19.500
experience running a big department so you you could imagine that the democrats would pick that one
00:15:26.760
as the one to get tough on but it looks like at least the republicans are you know solidly behind
00:15:33.900
him so that's all you need so i think the fact that that particular nomination is going to sail right
00:15:41.020
through feels like the trump effect that people are just giving him a little bit of a honeymoon
00:15:46.240
saying well if trump really wants this guy let's let's see what happens and by the way i don't have
00:15:54.040
an opinion positive or negative about p hegseth since i don't know him personally and i don't know of
00:16:00.080
any experiences relevant to this job except he's great with the military and they love him um so we'll
00:16:06.200
wait and see i have no no nothing negative to say about him he seems like a a solid patriot
00:16:13.080
meanwhile justin trudeau is expected to resign as early as today but maybe on wednesday when they have
00:16:21.520
some big political meeting you might want to get ahead of that so it doesn't look like he was forced
00:16:26.740
don't say to smart people now apparently um he is uh embattled and he's very uh his political career
00:16:36.580
is sort of in shambles so um and trump trump of course made it worse by threatening a 25 tariff
00:16:45.740
which probably got the whole country a little bit jittery but let me ask you this do you think trudeau
00:16:52.780
would be resigning if not for the fact that the canadians are looking at trump coming into office
00:16:58.400
seeing how happy america is and seeing that it's basically the opposite of what a trudeau would do
00:17:04.760
i think this is the trump effect not a hundred percent but don't you think it pushed it over the
00:17:12.000
top and made the timing now i think he changed canada you remember when people were arguing hey
00:17:20.400
uh threatening tariffs is a terrible strategy doesn't trump understand how tariffs work
00:17:27.980
you know threatening them is bad it's bad it never works and we would say hold on it's a negotiating
00:17:35.280
strategy just just see it as a strategy you'll be okay settle down and then he threatens a 25 across
00:17:43.220
the board uh tariff and next thing you know that the leader of the country is resigning
00:17:48.720
and he was the problem well i mean a big part of the problem would you agree let's see in the
00:17:57.140
comments do you agree that's the trump effect that you know he was he was hurting himself in a variety
00:18:02.440
of ways but i don't think he would have a he would be resigning now except for trump meanwhile over in
00:18:09.000
austria the uh austrian president uh bellen vender bellen uh he is officially asked the right-wing
00:18:17.700
populist freedom party of australia of austria austria to form a government so in austria a right-wing
00:18:27.560
populist party is forming a government is that the trump effect probably again not a hundred percent
00:18:37.380
but is it is it the thing that made it happen now and the thing that pushed it over the top
00:18:42.440
i think so i don't know you know i wouldn't say with certainty but looks like it meanwhile the dalai
00:18:52.300
lama was asked in a big interview was asked about immigration now the dalai lama of course would be
00:19:01.240
like the ultimate peace seeking character so he's going to want peace peace peace peace he's the dalai
00:19:08.580
of course he wants you know to be kind to people and peace and when asked about immigration he said
00:19:15.720
no no on immigration europe will become like afghanistan or africa and and the reporter says
00:19:25.340
like my parents came to the uk from india that's that's okay isn't it and dalai lama said no
00:19:34.220
he goes no he goes england is a small island 90 become indian so i think what he was saying was
00:19:48.220
no if you let everybody in india come to england it's not going to be england
00:19:53.560
so even the dalai lama is against unrestricted immigration and i asked the same question would he
00:20:06.600
have said this before would he have said it before trump made it okay to say it i don't think so
00:20:15.320
now again my bias is kicking in so i don't know what the dalai lama is thinking or what's influencing him
00:20:22.040
but i don't think i would have seen this before it feels like there's a a freedom of speech
00:20:29.100
and a framing of immigration that's entirely a trump creation and the dalai lama is given something he
00:20:37.120
could agree with because trump has caused so many people to agree with it then now it's an ordinary
00:20:43.740
opinion i don't think the dalai lama would have gone first and said you know everybody seems to be in
00:20:51.100
favor of this immigration thing but i'd like to tell you it's a big mistake i don't think he would
00:20:55.840
have done that i i think he can only say this and it's what he's saying is just common sense but he
00:21:02.700
can only say it because trump made it safe ontario the wait is over the gold standard of online casinos
00:21:09.660
has arrived golden nugget online casino is live bringing vegas style excitement and a world-class
00:21:15.460
gaming experience right to your fingertips whether you're a seasoned player or just starting signing
00:21:20.860
up is fast and simple and in just a few clicks you can have access to our exclusive library of the
00:21:26.420
best slots and top tier table games make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and
00:21:32.140
jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at golden nugget online casino
00:21:38.120
take a spin on the slots challenge yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game to feel the
00:21:43.320
thrill of real-time action all from the comfort of your own devices why settle for less when you can
00:21:48.700
go for the gold at golden nugget online casino gambling problem call connects ontario 1-866-531-2600
00:21:57.360
19 and over physically present in ontario eligibility restrictions apply see golden nugget casino.com
00:22:03.280
for details please play responsibly meanwhile over on cnn farid zakaria was saying that i'm much
00:22:11.160
better florida is run because he spends time in florida and new york state thinks new york state is
00:22:16.480
a crooked mess and that they spend way more money on government for not any extra benefits and he's
00:22:24.260
paying those taxes and he points out that progressive governments are worldwide are in decline and losing
00:22:30.720
elections so um out of i think 27 countries democratic countries maybe five of them are now progressive the rest of
00:22:41.220
them have lost and so he's pointing out that the progressive movement has failed and uh even though it was big
00:22:50.360
it was ruining everything and now it's retreating so
00:22:56.260
it seems like farid is blaming the democrats in america for letting their progressives get too much
00:23:05.820
control to which there's a kind of a question that's lingering here isn't it how in the world could the
00:23:14.220
progressives have have had so much control in america unless cnn backed them and msnbc and the rest of the
00:23:25.320
mainstream media so i feel like the meat the media is doing this clever trick where because they're the
00:23:31.820
main brainwashers they're brainwashing the public to think that the problem was the progressives
00:23:37.960
oh no it wasn't let me tell you what the problem was the problem was that you couldn't talk against
00:23:45.800
the progressives and the news wasn't going to talk against the progressives so they had a free pass
00:23:52.940
for years you couldn't say you didn't like their ideas because you'd be a racist and you couldn't say that
00:23:59.820
the media was lying because nobody would hear you because the media had all the control
00:24:05.620
so i think it's uh it's accurate and useful for for reed zakaria to point out that the progressives
00:24:14.200
have a losing um history and probably a losing future but it's a little disingenuous to not say
00:24:24.120
when you're sitting on cnn saying it the cnn's a big part of the problem and maybe the biggest do you
00:24:30.120
believe that progressives could have had any power if cnn had reported on them the way they're reporting
00:24:36.460
on them more recently and i'd say no everything that the the bad guys are doing is because the other
00:24:46.340
bad guys in the media said it was the best thing to do and you should shut up and if you complain you'll
00:24:51.880
get canceled so yes the news is trying to blame the democrats and the democrats would have a good
00:25:01.020
point if they blamed the news instead uh lex friedman friedman went over and talked to zelensky
00:25:08.500
i haven't heard the whole thing but i've seen some clips uh it seems that zelensky is very pro-trump
00:25:15.460
so zelensky is saying uh quote now this is translated but he said when i talk about something
00:25:23.780
talk about something with donald trump whether we meet in person or we just have a call all the
00:25:30.140
european leaders always ask how was it now apparently that's not normal that i guess if he meets with
00:25:39.760
biden nobody asks how was it but if he if he meets with trump everybody's curious and then goes on to
00:25:46.020
say this shows the influence of donald trump and this has never happened before with an american president
00:25:51.040
i tell you from my experience this also gives you confidence that he can stop this war
00:26:00.460
is this the trump effect yes it is the this one's unambiguous that's the trump effect trump has
00:26:11.860
already got the two warring sides to say we're just waiting for you big guy right they're just
00:26:19.400
saying we're just waiting for you because we know you're going to wrap this up and i know that you're
00:26:23.920
going to tell both of us to do things we don't want to do but we can't just do them because then we'd be
00:26:29.560
surrendering so we need you to lean on both of us because that's what we both need we need trump
00:26:35.340
to lean on us so that when we say ah i definitely don't want to make this concession but mean old
00:26:41.420
trump's going to make me do it and then everybody's happy it's the trump effect he's ending wars
00:26:51.760
um and then more trump effect so bill maher has on his club random show so that's his his side show
00:27:02.800
not his regular show he had actor john crier now john crier um is sort of politically oriented for
00:27:11.700
an actor and he's very pro democrat but the clips which i believe are chosen by bill maher himself or
00:27:22.000
or his team is where bill maher is basically mocking john crier for being in the news bubble and not
00:27:29.100
understanding anything that's really happening just imagine that he has on a guest who's just nothing
00:27:37.280
but a you know left-leaning super democrat anti-trumper and the the tenor of the conversation
00:27:43.580
is bill maher famous lefty telling another democrat activist that he doesn't even understand
00:27:53.380
anything otherwise he wouldn't have that opinion is that the trump effect yes it is
00:28:00.700
yes it is indirectly i mean there's lots of things going on but that's part of it
00:28:07.280
now i would like to for the record um i've met john crier so when two and a half men
00:28:15.380
was big thing on tv they they once had an episode in which they mentioned uh dilbert the dilbert comic
00:28:21.620
so the uh the writers and the producers um asked for permission and uh i think i asked in return
00:28:31.840
after you know of course i said yes um but i asked if my my uh significant other at the time and i could
00:28:40.400
attend a recording of the show so we got to sit in the front row and and watch them actually do the show
00:28:46.500
it was fascinating but afterwards uh we were taken down to meet the cast and met charlie sheen
00:28:53.940
and uh and then john crier came over and i gotta tell you john crier's the nicest guy
00:29:00.680
right so we we can talk politics and we can you know gently gently nudge him for not having the
00:29:09.260
right uh news sources i think that's legitimate but i gotta tell you he is a really nice guy
00:29:16.200
like you meet him in person there's not there's not a trace of hollywood on him somehow somehow none of
00:29:23.340
that took he's just he just seems like i don't know where he's from but he just seems like he
00:29:28.300
came from some midwestern state and he's just like really friendly so i like him so don't throw him
00:29:36.600
away you know don't discard him because he's not watching the right news programs he's a good guy
00:29:42.940
at least in the brief interaction i had he was very generous meanwhile over on msnbc which is not like
00:29:51.520
real news um simone sanders townsend i'm sorry this was on meet the press but it was msnbc host
00:30:00.160
simone sanders townsend and uh she claimed during a panel discussion that uh that biden is unequivocally
00:30:09.600
more mentally fit than trump um and that uh it's sort of all overblown and biden is fine and his brain
00:30:18.960
is fine still saying that today like like that's a current opinion okay um uh when i reposted it i just
00:30:33.960
asked you to look at her eyes so here's a little thing i i like to recommend when you know somebody
00:30:40.200
is lying and you know they know they're lying and you also know that they know you know they're lying
00:30:48.380
when it's that clear that they're lying watch for what their eyes do during the lie so if you watch it
00:30:58.200
i'll do my bad impression of it but her eyes are sort of you know ordinary but they're expressive
00:31:03.400
so they're moving around but when she gets to the lie part where she says that he's just as
00:31:08.920
cognitively good as anybody she she certainly narrows her eyes and says he's uh he is really
00:31:17.700
cognitively strong or whatever word she used and you could watch it with you could watch it with the
00:31:23.700
sound off and you could still spot the lie you would know when it happened just by the eyes but
00:31:30.460
you wouldn't notice that unless you would watch how she lies so her specific lie she narrows her eyes
00:31:38.280
and otherwise her eyes are normal so watch when you know somebody's lying and by the way this works in
00:31:45.580
relationships as well if you're in a relationship and you're in the weird situation where you know for
00:31:51.900
sure that somebody's lying to you just watch their face and the words they choose you'll earn
00:31:58.080
something anyway claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament i've been visualizing my match
00:32:05.040
all week she was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the column behind her car on her
00:32:10.320
backhand side good thing claudia's with intact the insurer with the largest network of auto service
00:32:16.460
centers in the country everything was taken care of under one roof and she was on her way in a rental car
00:32:21.460
in no time i made it to my tournament and lost in the first round but you got there on time intact
00:32:27.960
insurance your auto service ace certain conditions apply here's my uh persuasion tip next time a
00:32:35.860
democrat says trump is a felon because you know that's that's also the msnbc thing the cnn thing
00:32:41.700
uh he's a felon he's a felon he's the first president who's a felon he's a felon felon felon
00:32:47.460
here is the correct answer when he is called the felon next time you hear it you should agree
00:32:54.380
completely yeah he is a felon he reminds me of nelson mandela
00:33:00.260
just say that just say he reminds me of nelson mandela don't say he's the same don't say that
00:33:11.380
anything they did is similar just say he reminds you of nelson mandela and then the person who you're
00:33:19.140
talking to will probably try this uh but but nelson mandela was unfairly prosecuted
00:33:25.260
and then you then you just look at him and just smile
00:33:31.100
and walk away and that's all you need just let them do that he was unfairly prosecuted
00:33:40.580
don't even answer just smile because um i think we're at the point where we should treat the things
00:33:50.880
that could have or should have or in the past would have some power that the fact that people would call
00:33:57.920
him a felon today it's just a joke for the same reason that we're celebrating january 6 as a holiday
00:34:04.900
everything the democrats said we now understand to be fake and backwards and evil and corrupt
00:34:12.820
so you can't take any of this seriously anymore and i think trump has you know opened up our ability
00:34:19.620
to just understand that when the news says he's a felon we just laugh at it and and if you take it
00:34:28.780
seriously they're going to keep saying it so don't take it seriously just say yeah he reminds me of
00:34:35.760
nelson mandela now if you don't like that association because i hear some people say but you don't know
00:34:41.680
scott nelson mandela did horrible things and i don't know maybe he did maybe he didn't but if you don't
00:34:49.080
like that one use martin luther king just say yeah he reminds me of martin luther king
00:34:53.900
and then when they say but but martin luther king was brought up on fake charges just say
00:35:04.120
have a nice day because what you're trying to do is just uh mocking them of existence and making
00:35:12.540
an association they don't like you're not trying to be logical right the goal is not to use your
00:35:18.300
superior logic to show that this this case is like the other case no just make the association
00:35:24.080
and smile because you're happy about the association that the felon allowed you to see him as more like
00:35:30.880
a gandhi more like an mlk you know more like a nelson mandela and just leave it there
00:35:37.620
all right according to zero hedge governor newsom my california governor
00:35:47.000
um he says he's issuing the executive order directing state agencies to look into uh or target
00:35:54.880
uh ultra processed foods and related health concerns now that sounds exactly like what rfk jr
00:36:02.540
wants to bring to the nation as a whole but now we see that um california and newsom are front
00:36:11.600
running it they're they're getting ahead of it do you think that would have happened if trump had not
00:36:18.860
decided that rfk jr democrat though he had been is the right man to fix this problem i don't think so
00:36:27.100
again i think this is the trump effect i think newsom is trying to front run something that they
00:36:34.400
had completely ignored you know that the health impact and he's trying to look like when he runs
00:36:44.660
uh how good republicans are going to look if rfk jr pulls this off and he gets the food companies
00:36:54.600
to start serving us real food instead of poison
00:36:57.280
and that would be hard to compete against because that gives that's even deeper than your pocketbook
00:37:04.320
that goes right down to how do you feel how's your health are your kids thriving i mean this is the
00:37:11.220
deepest of the deepest um persuasion if you can fix somebody's food so that it doesn't make them
00:37:19.020
unhealthy you can't get deeper into somebody's soul than their stomach so so that republicans through
00:37:29.420
rfk jr have the ultimate it's the ultimate political it shouldn't be political but it is
00:37:36.120
political um winning thing if he can pull it off and i think he can so it just looks like uh
00:37:43.380
newsom's trying to get ahead of the parade because he knows he has to i don't think this would
00:37:47.560
happen otherwise it's a trump effect all right so a lot of people have asked me what do i think of
00:37:54.580
this tommy robinson situation over in the uk and honestly i hadn't really been following it
00:38:01.040
and also honestly i'm not really up on all the details so i'm just going to give you my general
00:38:08.940
impression from another country my understanding is he was an outspoken opponent of unrestricted
00:38:17.540
immigration so far i'm right right and but what he's in jail for at the moment is not related to
00:38:26.340
just being outspoken but rather you know maybe some contempt of court or some related thing but
00:38:35.300
certainly all stemming from the one thing there's one thing which he wants to have free speech and be
00:38:42.760
able to say you know the country is going to be destroyed now i'm going to say it in a way
00:38:51.360
if you were i said this in the man cave i'll try it out here if you were to take a bunch of
00:39:00.840
mormons and christians and put them in the same state how would they get along
00:39:05.960
fine fine mormons christians no problem now let's uh mix in some jewish americans how do they get
00:39:13.840
along fine fine mormons jews christians fine now let's throw in some hindus but american you know
00:39:22.740
not not in india but in america so now some hindus move in you throw them in with the jews the mormons
00:39:29.640
and the christians how do they get along fine fine you know you you might not know this but where i live
00:39:37.100
tons of indians tons of hindus if i'm invited to a party pretty much there's going to be hindu there
00:39:45.360
you know you can rely on it how do they get along perfectly perfectly no problem at all how about
00:39:52.820
uh the atheists now i throw the atheists in there well the atheists might say you know i'm more in
00:39:58.580
favor of abortion you know something like that but will they get along as neighbors yeah will they
00:40:05.800
respect the same um system yes now you can do it with ethnic groups say a bunch of italians came over
00:40:15.760
earlier in the century how'd that go well a lot of discrimination you know there are lots of name
00:40:21.780
calling they're like uh italians uh you know we're we're irish we can't be spending time with all these
00:40:27.360
italians then the germans hate the irish and the irish doesn't like the poles and and all these ethnic
00:40:33.640
groups are kind of not getting along but 100 years later we don't even think about that stuff when
00:40:40.860
was the last time you heard somebody being mocked for being irish or italian it just isn't really
00:40:48.140
even a thing so they assimilated everybody assimilated everybody's getting along now what
00:40:54.540
do all of those people who get along have in common it's not about being white because remember i threw
00:41:01.600
the the hindus in there it's not about being white and it's not about even your ethnicity
00:41:09.100
there's one thing they all have in common that they all come from a philosophy of getting along with
00:41:16.200
other people do the mormons want to conquer you no they want to get along do are the jews trying to
00:41:23.080
conquer america well some of you are going to say yes but the answer is no the real answer is no uh
00:41:29.960
they they they all have a philosophy of getting along now is that the same with islam well i think uh
00:41:40.200
i heard today the statistic there's something like a quarter of islam which is the minority but
00:41:47.080
a quarter of them worldwide are pretty sure that islam has to take over everything and be in charge
00:41:53.720
but here's the good news 75 percent are not about that at all 75 percent are just want to get along
00:42:01.320
just want to do their thing you do your thing we won't bother you you don't bother us great works for me
00:42:08.040
but what happens if you bring in so many muslims that they form like a an area in the city and
00:42:18.680
they've got sort of their own culture what happens with the 25 75 split do the 75 use their influence
00:42:28.200
and say you guys are you know you guys are bad for us so you better cut it out we're going to keep you
00:42:34.440
from being extremists because you know it's only 25 percent of you and and of the 25 percent a much
00:42:41.880
smaller number have any interest in any violence right so it's a very small number but put them all
00:42:49.080
together and come back in 10 years and what's it going to look like did the did the reasonable people
00:42:55.960
talk the unreasonable people out of their violence well unfortunately violence really works
00:43:02.760
meaning that if some of them are committed to violence or death they're eventually going to
00:43:10.200
scare everybody else into going along so eventually if you come back that small minority will have
00:43:18.840
convinced everybody that they should be pressing for sharia law the all the other groups i mentioned
00:43:24.920
are not going to do that they're happy with the american system but the islamists again small percentage of
00:43:32.200
them would effectively co-opt the peaceful people in their ranks who wouldn't want to break ranks
00:43:39.880
so given that islam has a conquest um philosophy or mentality built into it that again 75 of the
00:43:50.280
people are not buying into but 25 25 is almost enough to guarantee that the rest will get co-opted into a more
00:44:00.600
conservative extreme version of islam that's my take now if i say that have i insulted any people ethnicity
00:44:10.840
or religion i don't think so i think i just said they have a different view and if you fast forward it
00:44:19.000
there's sort of an obvious obvious outcome so if you if you're talking about a system and a percentage of
00:44:27.080
people and you can predict forward that the 25 or maybe much less almost certainly will co-opt the
00:44:34.680
rest of them and then it becomes a civil war i would say it's closer to a guarantee
00:44:42.440
because we're watching it happen in england right so we're watching it happen in europe we don't have to
00:44:47.160
gas is that the way it goes the violent people have a lot of power it's just always that way
00:44:55.880
so tommy robinson what i understand is saying the maybe a more provocative version of what i just said
00:45:03.400
and i don't think anybody disagrees with what i just said do you is there anybody here who disagrees
00:45:12.440
that these are not similar systems so let me say it in the summary you cannot treat the immigrants who
00:45:21.320
have a philosophy of getting along with the immigrants who have a philosophy of conquest
00:45:28.040
if you treat them the same you can't be in power um that's a problem now did tommy robinson do anything
00:45:38.840
i don't know about that if i did i'd be mad at him i don't know but i'm also not caring because i think
00:45:46.040
the tommy robinson thing has everything to do with the public saying if he can't talk we can't talk
00:45:53.480
and we want to talk so tommy robinson is nothing about tommy robinson that's the first thing i
00:46:01.640
learned or it's my opinion based on what i've looked into if you think tommy robinson is about
00:46:07.000
some crime he did or didn't do i don't know what he did or didn't do you're on the wrong topic
00:46:13.560
it's about whether somebody can say something that's true and obvious and really important
00:46:19.080
or if he's going to be suppressed now why are we all talking about tommy robinson more than we've
00:46:25.400
ever talked about him before in the united states what's causing that now you're going to say elon
00:46:31.240
musk right i think it's simpler i think it's the trump effect because the trump effect allows us to see
00:46:39.960
this as essentially a kind of censorship that will destroy the country for sure
00:46:46.680
and so we're reacting we're reacting to tommy robinson and i see many of you backing him
00:46:52.920
one event in jail and it's not because of anything he did or didn't do criminally it's about as long
00:46:59.800
as he's in jail the muslims are winning and there are the few of them within the group that want to
00:47:08.200
conquest so if you want to defend yourself against what seems like an obvious risk
00:47:16.680
having a system come in where conquest is the primary element of it for 25 or less
00:47:24.360
um you've got to be able to talk about it and you've got to be able to offend people when you do it
00:47:31.080
ideally you wouldn't offend anybody but you've got to have the right to do it otherwise you're going to
00:47:36.280
be censoring yourself to the point of being useless so tommy robinson is more about showing incredible
00:47:43.080
bravery for something of incredible importance and i believe like not to overuse the analogy but like
00:47:51.560
nelson mandela and like trump who got law fared we're starting to see the legal process working against
00:47:58.520
him as a plus for his message and his authority do you think that tommy robinson will someday be
00:48:08.840
in charge of great britain do you think he'll someday be the prime minister i don't know probably
00:48:16.520
not because the the islamic um population is big enough to prevent it i would think but he's got
00:48:22.920
more of a shot than he ever had before because going to jail and being jailed unfairly and unreasonably
00:48:30.440
by your competitors that opens people's eyes a little bit wait a minute wait a minute is he really
00:48:38.040
in jail because of these alleged crimes or is it really all about just the one thing that we don't
00:48:45.080
have freedom of speech in the uk and he's trying to he's trying to say things and we don't like it
00:48:50.920
because it'll hurt feelings of the people trying to conquer us as well as the 75 percent we're not
00:48:58.920
so um you were asking me for my opinion and my opinion is that i want tommy robinson freed
00:49:05.960
because i want free speech in my country i want free speech for the people in europe if they can get
00:49:12.440
it back i think it's too late i i think actually europe's largely going to just become islamic
00:49:19.080
so uh because there's a point of no return you know once your population reaches a certain percentage
00:49:26.760
of the conquering philosophy and they're willing to die for it you're pretty much going to go that
00:49:34.120
way we're not there but we're trying to avoid getting there when i found out my friend got a great
00:49:41.000
deal on a wool coat from winners i started wondering is every fabulous item i see from
00:49:46.840
winners like that woman over there with the designer jeans are those from winners ooh are
00:49:52.680
those beautiful gold earrings did she pay full price or that leather tote or that cashmere sweater or
00:49:58.040
those knee-high boots that dress that jacket those shoes is anyone paying full price for anything
00:50:04.520
stop wondering start winning winners find fabulous for less all right um biden there's another story
00:50:13.560
that says uh biden is going to ban some offshore drilling before he left office and you probably
00:50:19.560
had the same same thought i did which is well then trump will just reverse it because it's an executive
00:50:26.040
order and then somebody said he can't reverse it and then i said what do you mean he can't reverse it
00:50:32.120
if it's if it's done by executive order another executive order can't reverse it and the answer is
00:50:39.240
maybe it can't because it turns out um the ap was reporting this but i think the hill or somebody said
00:50:46.680
that um there's some kind of outer continental shelf lands act that gives the president the right
00:50:54.600
to block drilling in certain areas but not the right to reinstate it what
00:51:02.120
what how could there be an existing act that says the president can do a thing but not undo it
00:51:11.800
to me that sounds like supreme court right if if trump on day one reversed it which by the way i'm
00:51:21.400
not sure we even want to we'll talk about that but if he did reverse it would the court say oh you can't
00:51:27.960
do it because the outer continental shelf lands act or are they going to say no there's a reason we give
00:51:34.360
presidents broad authority we like a strong president and executive order is simply how to how to interpret
00:51:41.800
something you know it's more about not changing the law you just change how it's interpreted
00:51:48.360
do you think that trump could just say well i interpret this continental shelf lands act as
00:51:53.800
you know a political a political law and not a functional law or something like that now it
00:52:01.320
seems like there'd be some argument he could make that he could do it and then just take it to the
00:52:05.960
supreme court if you think it's important but here's the thing you should know um the places that were banned
00:52:12.520
were places that nobody's doing any exploring and was unlikely to ever become a place they got energy so the
00:52:19.480
main places that we do the um we do the uh offshore drilling are still unaffected so it's not the
00:52:29.000
biggest thing in the world but since trump said drilled drill baby drill he might want to give the
00:52:35.080
industry at least the option that so far they've not been that interested in sam altman um the head of
00:52:43.480
the chat gpt open ai has a few interesting things to say today one he said that um agi which is the
00:52:51.800
super intelligence which is a whole different technology than the current ai the current ai is just
00:52:57.560
looking for patterns and it hallucinates and it's you know there's a limit to what it can do it's amazing
00:53:04.920
but there's a limit built in but agi would be a different process i don't know what it looks like
00:53:11.000
but sam oman says in a new blog post quote we are now confident we know how to build it agi that's
00:53:17.480
the the good kind of ai um and uh so they're ready to build it now that would be not just news
00:53:31.160
but the biggest news in human civilization if it's true if we really know how to build this advanced
00:53:38.120
intelligence which nobody's done yet that's effectively a new life form
00:53:45.720
yeah the current one just looks like a mimic so it doesn't look like i mean to me the current version
00:53:51.480
of ai after you use it a while it doesn't become more human it just becomes more obvious that it's
00:53:57.480
machined with a lot of flaws so the more you use the current version of ai the the less it seems like a
00:54:03.320
person because it just doesn't have the same characteristics but could they get agi to be
00:54:09.240
legitimately smarter now remember my prediction that if we invented something that was smarter than us
00:54:15.880
we would have to mechanically turn it off when we didn't agree with it because most of our ideas
00:54:23.000
are not logical they're emotional so we're going to turn off any logical argument that doesn't agree with
00:54:29.400
us and we'll program it out of it so i think agi will be so crippled by humans not wanting it to
00:54:38.760
change other people's minds about what's a reasonable thing to do that i i think we'll find a way to make
00:54:44.120
it useless even if the technology does everything they thought it would do i think humans will just ban
00:54:51.000
it will just become illegal we'll see uh the other interesting thing is that sam altman said that
00:54:59.960
chat gpt is currently losing money uh on their subscriptions and he said that he's he personally
00:55:07.640
set the price of the app because he didn't think people would use it that much but they're using it
00:55:13.080
so much that the usage is driving the costs up and they're losing money currently
00:55:17.960
so i think that's a hint that the price is going to go up but we'll see
00:55:29.000
isn't making some more news this is reported by shadow of ezra i saw this on on x so in a recent
00:55:36.360
interview candace owens uh said that uh that pedophiles are intentionally placed in positions of power
00:55:42.760
um because it's easier to control them because you can blackmail them etc and she further suggested
00:55:51.640
here's where it gets really interesting uh there's not a coincidence that justin trudeau barack obama
00:55:58.440
zelensky and emmanuel macron of france are all gay she says this is her claim uh and she alleged that
00:56:06.360
macron is married to a transgender man who molested him when he was a child now i would bet against that
00:56:15.320
last part but you know anything's possible like i guess i wouldn't be shocked if if the most outrageous
00:56:25.160
claims here turned out to be true but uh i i don't have you know proof of these claims uh however
00:56:33.000
what do you think of the general concept that we have an unusual number of leaders who are in the
00:56:39.000
closet um or they're doing something illegal with children what what do you think do you think it's a
00:56:46.840
coincidence that so many leaders appear to be in the category of blackmailable and when they're not
00:56:55.640
blackmailable for sexual reasons isn't it weird that biden got selected and he was so blackmailable for his
00:57:03.640
overseas crime crime family activities and that clinton was president when it was so obvious that
00:57:12.600
you know he had a he had a past and probably a current i feel like i do feel like the the hypothesis
00:57:22.440
that something like the deep state is choosing our leaders to to be able to control them as opposed to
00:57:30.040
getting good leaders i can't rule that out because the pattern seems so screamingly obvious
00:57:39.560
um that how do i ignore that now on one hand you could say well they're men and they're powerful and
00:57:48.840
wherever you find powerful men you know there's good chance they're doing some things behind the
00:57:53.880
scenes you don't like so maybe it's just we just find out because they're leaders and otherwise we
00:58:00.360
just don't find out maybe but it sure looks like a pattern um i'm not going to claim that it's valid
00:58:09.400
but i wouldn't ignore a pattern that's that that's that obvious i mean i think it looks obvious
00:58:16.360
that they all look blackmailable but it could be just it could be just a because the news tends to
00:58:23.640
get into stuff and makes us think that way maybe i don't know so biden uh lost a little bit uh he was
00:58:32.360
asked about something he didn't like maybe something about his age and he said quote and this is on video
00:58:37.320
this is brand new my being the oldest president i know more world leaders than any one of you ever met in
00:58:44.120
your whole gd life gd filled in with the actual you know using the lord's name in vain part um
00:58:54.520
why would he say that in public who in the world says that somebody with dementia i mean obviously
00:59:04.280
isn't it isn't it super obvious that that's just a dementia anger who talks like that
00:59:15.480
you know how i compliment trump for his strategic cursing he doesn't use gd
00:59:23.080
i've never heard it have you he uses the f word and the s word but he uses them like you know maybe once
00:59:30.840
once every now and then and then they're perfect if he only uses it once now and then it's just a nice
00:59:39.240
nice powerful accent that causes the news to hold whatever point he made very strategic and smart but
00:59:46.680
here's here's uh biden just using really the most offensive um curse that you can use in america
00:59:54.200
right it's the most offensive one because there's so many christians who are and by the way i i often
01:00:00.520
use the same curse word um and i and i get slapped down every time i do it a hundred percent of the time
01:00:08.920
i accidentally let that one fly because i've do it i've done it on the live streams a hundred percent of
01:00:13.800
the time the comments turn to you know we don't like that one that that one's a little too far because
01:00:20.360
that's not just a curse word people take that as an insult to their faith so a politician using that
01:00:30.520
one that's just bad impulse control or not understanding how anything works but it's notable
01:00:38.440
that trump doesn't use that one because it's a pretty common one you know privately it's pretty common
01:00:43.960
um in my defense there is no defense but i'll give you context there's no defense so if it if it if
01:00:54.760
it offends you you have a valid feeling so i'm not going to argue against your feeling you if you feel
01:01:01.800
it you feel it and you're certainly certainly welcome to express your feelings but here's what you
01:01:09.080
should know i'm not a believer so if i were a believer i think you should be really mad at me
01:01:16.600
because i would be accepting that i was insulting you and you know something that i believed in too
01:01:23.880
but as a non-believer these words don't mean anything to me that there is just a a popular couple of
01:01:30.920
swear words so just know that um even though i agree with you i'm trying to use it less so i agree
01:01:40.520
with you completely 100 agreement just know that if somebody doesn't use the same vocabulary in the
01:01:48.360
same way you do it doesn't mean anything it just means it doesn't mean anything to me but since it
01:01:53.560
means something to you your point is 100 accurate and i will try to adjust all right
01:02:03.000
um and then um biden was asked at the same event if he still thinks trump is a threat to democracy
01:02:12.520
and then biden dementia or not use some clever weasel words and he said what trump did is a threat
01:02:20.360
to democracy so the question is is trump a threat to democracy but he weaseled it and said what he
01:02:28.200
did was a threat to democracy meaning the old january 6 now that's actually closer to a fair statement
01:02:39.640
if you say trump is a is you know a risk to democracy that's a little too far if you say that
01:02:46.680
what he did on january 6 was a risk to democracy even a lot of republicans would say yeah that was
01:02:52.120
too far now i don't think it was a risk to democracy personally but it's not crazy to say that the way he
01:03:00.600
acted on january 6 was not ideal for our system that'd be you know a reasonable different difference of
01:03:06.520
opinion um but then fox immediately reported it that biden said that trump is a threat to democracy
01:03:14.360
democracy and that's not what he said so i'm calling out to fox news for some fake news that was as
01:03:21.400
obvious obviously fake as anything could be because they would show you the quote in which he very
01:03:27.640
carefully says that what he did was a threat to democracy there's no way to interpret that other than
01:03:33.800
january 6 and and then immediately the reporter comes on and says he says trump's a threat to democracy
01:03:41.800
that didn't happen that didn't happen that didn't happen oh i'm hearing that um trudeau is resigning
01:03:48.760
right now is trudeau resigning right now as i'm doing this yeah anyway so fake news everywhere
01:04:01.080
um the washington post is losing star reporters and as molly hemingway pointed out ben smith who used
01:04:08.840
to be at the new york times but then he founded semaphore uh is writing that those leaving the
01:04:14.280
washington post and then they give a name of some star reporter i don't know um are leaving because
01:04:20.760
they want to do resistance propaganda against republicans and are worried they can't do it there
01:04:26.280
anymore this is somebody who was from the new york times saying in direct language that the people you
01:04:34.040
thought were writers at the washington post didn't even see themselves as writers they saw themselves
01:04:41.800
as resistant propagandists now that's according to somebody who was in the same space not the same paper
01:04:49.640
but he was working at the new york times i feel like when he talks about it
01:04:54.040
he knows what he's talking about so uh i guess it's just confirming everything we knew that the
01:05:04.520
washington post was a resistance propaganda rag and jeff bezos to his credit seems to be you know
01:05:13.000
putting some uh energy into making it more of an actual newspaper or at least pretending to be an actual
01:05:19.080
newspaper better i don't i don't know which one he's doing but i'll tell you what you know the what
01:05:24.040
the washington post was the first one that canceled me and the first thing i feel about that is
01:05:31.080
honestly it is a great relief that i don't take money for my comic strip from a fake news organization
01:05:43.960
i always felt uncomfortable about it but i'm so glad they canceled me now now that you know that
01:05:54.920
the washington post has essentially tipped their hand as um you know even though this is not their own
01:06:01.560
word for themselves i think ben smith has probably got his finger on the pulse there when he says they're
01:06:07.640
resistance propaganda against republicans i think you got that right now knowing that the washington
01:06:14.360
post is literally resistance propaganda against trump does that make you look at my cancellation any
01:06:21.880
differently given that they were the ones who led it no they're resistance propaganda against trump
01:06:30.520
canceling me is part of resistance propaganda against trump
01:06:39.720
do you know that zero republicans canceled me none not one do you know that not a single person has
01:06:47.800
disagreed with what i said if they've heard it in context none not not a black person not a white
01:06:54.520
person people have said they wish i hadn't said it they said that they said they were offended but
01:07:00.600
when they hear it in context which you never hear in the news it's always out of context when they hear it
01:07:05.800
in context from me they understand it differently and a hundred percent of people are completely aware
01:07:14.120
that a black man or woman would not have been canceled for anything i said it was propaganda
01:07:21.960
and resistance and i was just a prominent voice in favor of trump and so they just took me off the
01:07:29.720
field or tried to they tried to so that's how you understand that better meanwhile over in china nbc news
01:07:36.760
says that president xi in china still says corruption is the biggest threat to the communist party and there
01:07:43.720
are all kinds of examples of him removing people and making big changes which he says are aimed at reducing
01:07:51.800
corruption now it's important because she said this years ago and has been working diligently
01:08:00.520
or or so it seems from the outside to get rid of china corruption but now it sounds like it just got worse
01:08:08.520
so he's been working on it for years and it's like it sounds like it's the worst it's ever been
01:08:12.840
and so here's the thing number one do you believe it's the biggest risk to china i think it is because
01:08:24.680
i don't think they're going to die in a nuclear fireball um i think they'll find a way around their
01:08:31.640
crumbling economy because they're smart and they're they're adaptable um but if the corruption just takes all
01:08:40.200
the good stuff out of the economy well then they might be in real trouble and my question would be
01:08:46.840
is it possible to have a dictatorship without corruption and i'll go further is it possible
01:08:55.720
to have a government without massive corruption it seems to me that america's biggest institutions
01:09:02.200
are massively corrupted maybe in a different way they're not all taking money i think i think in china
01:09:08.840
it's more about taking money uh in the us you know whatever makes our fbi act the way they are
01:09:16.040
it's not money it's some kind of brainwashing trump derangement syndrome something um
01:09:25.560
so i don't think that he's able i don't think he he will have the capability of taking the corruption
01:09:31.400
and in china i think it's the whole system i think the whole system depends on the powerful and rich
01:09:39.800
being able to abuse the system and therefore they want to keep it if the rich and powerful could not
01:09:46.360
abuse the system to make a little extra money and stay in that upper class if they couldn't do that they
01:09:52.440
might they might they might be you know looking for a change of government until they can so
01:09:59.240
i don't think he's going to fix that i think the corruption is going to be the big thing
01:10:05.640
meanwhile according to the new york post chris nezzi is writing that the lgbtq community are starting to
01:10:11.960
arm themselves so far more likely they're getting uh weapons and uh it's because they they're afraid of being
01:10:21.000
placed in concentration camps by trump trump is literally trying to prevent the people who would
01:10:30.040
kill them for their beliefs or their sexual orientation he's trying to prevent people who
01:10:35.080
would do harm to them from coming in the country and he's doing everything he can to prevent that
01:10:40.040
like really risking his life trump is literally risking his life to prevent people who would come into
01:10:48.120
the country to kill the lgbtq community he he's he's not even he's not even slightly anti-lgbtq not even
01:10:57.800
slightly there's nothing you can point to that would give you any comfort if you had that opinion that he
01:11:04.760
was nothing and you know there are never any examples nobody ever says well i think he's gonna
01:11:13.080
round us up and put us in camps because of those other three things he did no no it's not based on
01:11:20.120
anything not based on anything and what kind of news are they watching uh i would guess that 100 of
01:11:29.560
the lgbtq people who bought weapons to protect themselves against being rounded up by the american
01:11:36.920
government i'll bet a hundred percent of them get their news from msnbc i'll bet a hundred percent
01:11:44.920
now they might also you know sample some other stuff but i'll bet it's mostly msnbc
01:11:50.520
because even if you read only the new york times it wouldn't tell you to buy a gun so you can avoid
01:11:57.000
being rounded up that's kind of only on msnbc that's a big platform it might be smaller ones
01:12:05.160
so good job msnbc you just ruined the lives of the lgbtq community who thought they were succeeding
01:12:12.760
in life and doing a great job with their overall national brand which i always say is the best i've
01:12:18.520
ever seen the lgbtq community if you look at their success in going from have to stay in the closet to
01:12:27.880
run for any office in the country and get elected unbelievably successful like i am blown away
01:12:36.680
by the level of bravery in the lgbtq community the level of bravery um in every sentence physical
01:12:45.960
physical economic social the level of bravery pushing that movement is stunning
01:13:03.000
uh waymo there's some uh according to clean technica and zachary shay and his writing that
01:13:10.680
it looks like a reinsurer has done some analysis of the waymo self-driving cars and found out that
01:13:17.560
they're way safer than human driven cars based on the number of miles driven already listen to these
01:13:24.760
numbers the waymo driver uh the waymo you know the self-driving car is an 88 reduction in property damage
01:13:34.280
claims claims per mile driven 88 less property damage meaning running into cars and flagpoles and stuff
01:13:45.240
um the the self-driving car the waymo was a 92 reduction in bodily injury claims 92 improvement in in
01:13:58.520
basically harm to the driver 92 percent um and the waymo the waymo car was involved in nine property
01:14:09.880
damage claims over the period they looked at and two bodily injury claims so it's not 100 safe but
01:14:16.760
nothing is so nine property and two bodily injury claims over 25 million miles drone driven
01:14:24.680
for human drivers how does that compare to nine property damage and two bodily uh if you if you uh
01:14:34.200
control for you know miles driven um the total expectation for the human in the same miles driven
01:14:41.560
would be 78 instead of nine claims of property damage and 26 bodily injury claims compared to two
01:14:51.080
two for the self-driving car now i remind you that not too long ago elon musk made the prediction
01:15:00.040
that um when he said it he said we're not there yet but we're really close and he said it will very
01:15:06.520
soon be true that the self-driving cars are way safer not just as good but way safer than human driven
01:15:15.480
cars and we're there we are there now this is one of the biggest days in the history of tesla even though
01:15:25.160
we're talking about waymo a competitor because tesla probably is going to have the best self-driving
01:15:31.000
car situation and it's a major part of their business going forward it looks like
01:15:36.120
this is a this is a turning point um here's the bad news it is my opinion that the way the world works
01:15:46.600
you know for example requiring you to use a seat belt how many of you are old enough to remember when
01:15:52.760
that wasn't required seat belts i am i remember when they first said you have to put it on and i remember
01:16:00.120
thinking oh my god the the government is like overreach like they're telling me what to put around
01:16:06.600
my waist you know when i'm on my own and you know for i don't know maybe a year or two every single
01:16:15.560
time i put it on my seat belt i bitched about it even maybe mentally i'd be like the government
01:16:22.600
making me do this unnecessary safety thing now fast forward 20 years i can't imagine not putting
01:16:31.160
a seat belt on because it's just common sense of course you're going to put a seat belt on of course
01:16:37.560
you are and even if you don't want to do it for yourself don't you have any loved ones with that
01:16:42.760
would prefer to see you survive a car crash don't you have any respect for the the health care system
01:16:50.040
and other drivers on the road and everything else and cost of insurance so to me it starts as like
01:16:58.600
this huge government overreach but then when you live with it and you get used to it because you can
01:17:04.600
get used to anything it you look back and you go how did we ever not have seat belts and not have them
01:17:11.240
required now look at self-driving cars if they're 10 times safer 10 times safer you think it's not
01:17:19.960
going to be against the law for a human to drive a car in the future of course it will it's guaranteed
01:17:26.920
these numbers guarantee that maybe not everywhere you know maybe it'll be urban areas first you know
01:17:34.360
maybe just some highways at first but eventually it would be kind of crazy to be on the road at the same
01:17:42.040
time as a human driver once you get to the point where 80 of the cars are self-driving
01:17:48.520
and you're in one and you're just happily in your safe self-driving car and then you see some human
01:17:54.760
drivers go by what's going to be your first reaction it's like oh look at all these human drivers i don't
01:18:02.200
feel safe anymore right because the only person who's going to run into you is a human you can look
01:18:10.440
at every self-driving car and say well i mean there's some chance we might crash but really small
01:18:17.240
but you see the human go by you're like i don't know how drunk that guy is it looks like he didn't
01:18:21.960
sleep i don't think he's even paying attention how old is that driver my god oh they're 16 just got their
01:18:28.360
license no that one's 100 we're gonna talk ourselves out of driving so quickly it's gonna happen in the
01:18:38.680
future i think it's still several several years in the future but it's coming there's nothing to stop
01:18:44.520
it your driving will be illegal in populated areas all right so here's some science uh rounded out with
01:18:55.000
some science so according to psy post eric dolan is writing um that your romantic relationships are
01:19:03.640
better if you have a positive view of the world they had to do a study to find out if you would be
01:19:12.280
more romantically attractive if you had a positive outlook um you didn't really need to do that you
01:19:22.920
could have just asked me scott are our optimists better off and i'd say what domain of life are you
01:19:31.640
talking about and then the person would start to answer and i'd say no i'm just kidding you don't
01:19:37.240
have to tell me what domain you're talking about everybody who is an optimist is better off in every
01:19:43.240
situation you could think of romance business everything optimism makes you healthier so you don't have to
01:19:52.760
study it yes having a positive outlook does make every single thing the person does better on average
01:20:02.520
i think i need to give science my phone number so they can just call me hey we're thinking about
01:20:06.680
doing a study well i can i can have that offer you uh also same writer eric dolan in psypost um
01:20:15.480
says there's a new study that challenges the assumption about social media's harm to mental health
01:20:21.400
so they did a study and they found out that the people who used it more uh wasn't much different
01:20:27.560
but here's what i think they did i think they studied the same people and they looked at whether
01:20:36.200
they had just looked at a lot of social media or whether they hadn't i don't know if that's the
01:20:41.240
right way to test that i'd rather see people who just routinely and organically use a lot of social media
01:20:49.080
and compare them to people who just routinely and organically don't really pay attention to it
01:20:55.240
i feel like they would be different populations and that there'd be some population that they're worse
01:21:01.320
off and there'd be some population that's better off for example people who have really strong
01:21:08.280
mental health and i put myself in that category um i feel lucky i don't know if it's because i was born
01:21:16.520
before some pollutants or what it is but um um anyway um we have a couple other studies coming up here
01:21:29.960
the the assumption about media social media i think is maybe the study is not valid because if you studied
01:21:37.480
me looking at social media where i don't have any real mental health problems i'm pretty sure it doesn't
01:21:43.640
affect me much if at all in fact it just makes me happy sometimes if it's good if i'm watching uh
01:21:50.840
kittens play with dogs it's not making me unhappy but if i had poor mental health and i also had a
01:21:59.560
strategy that kept me with poor mental health which is spending time looking at sad things maybe
01:22:06.760
my social media would start to become full of sad things and then i would get sadder
01:22:13.640
because i made the mistake of thinking i should look at sad things when i go to social media i'm
01:22:18.600
like ooh kitten hugging a dog let me watch this for a while and then next thing you know my feed is full
01:22:24.120
of kittens hugging dogs and i'm like oh these are great i can't wait to do this a little bit more
01:22:30.040
but if you are starting out as a negative person with a mental health problem and you click on the wrong
01:22:35.480
things uk police commissioner threatens to extradite and jail u.s citizens over online posts will come
01:22:43.800
after you oh that can't possibly be true oh great britain the the uk is just dead they're so gone
01:22:55.320
uh yeah try it just come for us let's see how that works out for you nobody will ever visit your
01:23:03.160
country again nor should they all right um then there's another study that interacting with your
01:23:11.560
family may boost your immune system of course um but they talk about in the study this is in a tech
01:23:18.360
explorist pranjay malwar is writing and so it points out that we know that loneliness is implicated in heart
01:23:29.080
disease and some other health problems but if somebody is lonely and that causes them to have
01:23:36.200
more health problems than they normally would and let's say they but they die of one what's the cause
01:23:41.240
of death so loneliness causes you to have poor heart health and then you die of poor heart health
01:23:51.320
was the cause of death heart or was the cause of death loneliness loneliness caused the heart problem
01:23:59.400
well of course it would be you know scored as the heart problem
01:24:07.240
but i think if we coded it as a loneliness death not that we'd be able to measure that very well
01:24:12.760
but if we called it a loneliness death we would treat it differently we'd say oh there's a national
01:24:19.080
loneliness crisis but if we say that people are dying of heart disease then we say oh the lonely
01:24:26.120
people just need to try harder and get some friends it doesn't seem important does it but if the but if
01:24:32.040
you knew that 30 000 seniors a year were dying from loneliness i'm just making that up but i wouldn't be
01:24:38.280
surprised then it would be like this national thing so the way you code it as the cause of death really
01:24:46.280
makes a difference and i think that we're ignoring the loneliness crisis because it doesn't have a death
01:24:52.360
rate attached to it and that we measure to things that we can count you can count deaths you can't
01:24:58.600
really count loneliness as easily so it won't ever be treated until you can measure it in some objective
01:25:07.080
way so that's bad um then i saw the daily mail is writing about mysterious fog sweeping the u.s
01:25:16.040
now first of all i don't know if the fog people keep talking about is mysterious
01:25:21.560
i have not seen any local mysterious fog but i will say again that in the past year or so
01:25:32.120
the clouds where i live are completely different than any time in my adult life what is that
01:25:40.200
so where i live in california we don't have the same weather as other people
01:25:45.560
so in the summer it would typically be you know 100 blue sky um or in the winter maybe 100 overcast
01:25:54.920
and rainy and sometimes but not often there'd be mostly blue sky but you know a few little patches of
01:26:02.520
fluffy clouds and it would be the same kind you'd look up and if you saw some fluffy clouds
01:26:07.800
you might see more than one but they're all the same type fluffy fluffy maybe there'd be a little
01:26:13.720
bit of a second kind of cloud you know different different uh part of the stratosphere or something but
01:26:19.960
lately if i walk out i will see every kind of cloud at the same time and there'll be you know
01:26:27.480
contrails going through it and i'll see wisps i'll see i'll see rows of things i'll see things that look
01:26:33.480
like they're they're symmetrical and i'll just look at the sky and i'll think i did i live my whole life
01:26:42.040
and never see this sky and it's routinely completely different than it's looked before
01:26:49.160
so much so that i've been taking pictures of it for a long time and my pictures are just
01:26:54.840
i've never seen this before so is there something going on well did you know that in 1950 the u.s navy
01:27:04.440
sprayed a massive amount of bacteria in the air two miles off the coast of san francisco
01:27:10.280
this is in the daily mail and what they wanted to do is they they thought that the bacteria was
01:27:16.200
harmless but they had some way of tracking you know how far it went and whether it got into people
01:27:22.920
or something but it killed at least one person and hospitalized a bunch of others
01:27:29.480
but if you're wondering scott would our government without telling us
01:27:34.760
gas the citizens and you know use it in fog or something and use it as a way to spread some deadly
01:27:42.200
thing and the answer is yes yes they would they did it in the 1950s what changed nothing nothing
01:27:53.480
changed that would cause them to think differently and not do it in in current times they would just have
01:27:59.640
to have an argument that it made sense or an argument that it wasn't hurting anybody so i don't think
01:28:05.640
the fog story is real i don't think there's any kind of experimenting going on but i hate the fact
01:28:11.560
i can't rule it out can't rule it out i hate that anyway that's all i got from today i'm going to say
01:28:19.560
hi to the locals people just quickly because i went too long locals people i'm coming at you the rest
01:28:25.800
of you i'll see you tomorrow same time same place