Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 11, 2025


Episode 2747 CWSA 02⧸11⧸25


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 24 minutes

Words per Minute

144.87367

Word Count

12,227

Sentence Count

709

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

35


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we discuss: Dr. Dilbert's new job as an engineer for Doge, Why women like stronger men, and What the hell is the real reason why Donald Trump is so popular?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 civilization that's called coffee with scott adams and you've never had a better time but if
00:00:06.380 you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny
00:00:10.720 shiny human brains all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein
00:00:14.760 a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee
00:00:19.840 and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine at the end of the day the thing that makes
00:00:25.380 everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens right now
00:00:31.220 you are now fortified all right if you were subscribing to the dilbert comic
00:00:43.780 which never stopped some of you think it did but it didn't um dilbert is uh being recruited to work
00:00:51.760 on doge so it's uh just gonna be a one-week series you won't be there long because he always has to
00:00:57.740 return to his other life but uh dilbert is selected to work for doge i don't know if you knew this
00:01:03.560 but in the dilbert comic universe although dilbert is a put-upon cubicle employee uh i always try to
00:01:14.380 frame him as the best engineer in the world so of course he'd be asked of course he would
00:01:21.580 all right um let's look and see if there's any science that they could have skipped and maybe
00:01:28.960 save some money let's see uh eric nolan's running for a side post the stronger men have more sex
00:01:35.260 partners stronger men have more sex partners hmm i wonder how much they spent to find out that women
00:01:45.260 like stronger men because i didn't see it coming no i did see it coming next time just ask me scott
00:01:54.140 we're thinking about doing a study of to see if tall men have more sex don't need to they do well okay
00:02:02.580 well what if we studied to find out if tall rich men have more sex don't need to don't need to they
00:02:10.380 do okay but we're still curious about tall rich men who have all of their hair yes more sex every
00:02:19.660 time but what about tall rich men who go to the gym and really have a good physique again save your
00:02:27.420 money this is why you come to me first big money saver i'm like i'm like pre-doge you don't even need
00:02:37.680 doge if you just come to me first that's all you need to do i'm just full of answers um there's another
00:02:48.400 study in american psychological association i guess that's a publication uh they found out that satire
00:02:56.460 is more damaging than boring criticism hmm who could they have asked to save some money on that
00:03:06.260 study oh that's right why don't you ask the cartoonist who writes satire all the time like i'm doing
00:03:13.860 right now mocking their stupid ass study notice how my satire about their stupid ass study
00:03:19.600 is way more damning than a boring criticism well i i'm not sure that was a high priority study
00:03:27.180 no see boring as soon as i lay the satire on sing sing right to the heart just ask me next time
00:03:36.100 satire it's good stuff well cnn is uh showing their their numbers data guy harry enton uh he shows
00:03:46.480 the 70 percent of americans say trump is doing exactly what he said he would do if he got elected
00:03:51.660 especially the doge stuff he was pretty clear about that but uh in addition trump set new highs his
00:03:59.660 popularity is at a new all-time high including his entire first term and what could possibly be the
00:04:08.440 reason behind his popularity could it be that he picks the uh i'm going to use the scott jennings
00:04:17.460 frame because this is a good one that trump picks the things that 80 percent of the country likes
00:04:23.580 and of course 20 to 25 percent of the country is wrong about everything so it wouldn't matter what
00:04:29.500 it was it's like should we save the the orphans uh because the orphanage is on fire and there's still
00:04:37.540 plenty of time to get the orphans out should we save them well yeah 80 percent of the country would
00:04:44.700 say you save those orphans what are you talking about of course you would but 20 percent would say
00:04:49.520 what kind of orphans are we talking about are they republicans i don't know not so fast maybe they
00:04:56.480 deserve it now i'm just making that up but the point is 20 percent of the public is wrong about
00:05:02.000 everything so if you get it if you have a topic that 80 of the public is on the same side that's
00:05:08.700 basically everyone because the other 20 are not thinkers or serious or understanding of their
00:05:18.180 environment in any important way so you can ignore the last 20 as not even real no matter what the
00:05:25.720 question is 20 no you're not even you're not even in the right conversation people so as long as trump's
00:05:33.980 doing the things that are super popular you can mix in a few things that are you know maybe 50 50s and
00:05:40.120 a couple of 40 60s and he's going to be golden um but the other reason that he's popular is that people
00:05:47.800 love action and they love energy and they love it even more when it's coming from a dominant male
00:05:55.340 figure why because we're human we're just human if you're a guy are you not impressed by a high
00:06:04.040 energy powerful um alpha male of course you are why do we watch football we watch football because it's
00:06:12.860 just filled with these high powered high energy alpha males it's what we like do women like to uh do they
00:06:22.540 they feel good about high energy alpha males yeah yeah who doesn't 20 20 don't like that
00:06:32.560 because they don't like anything it's different 20 every time but uh the other the other thing is
00:06:39.520 besides being uh high energy and high action you know just the pace of things is just purely impressive
00:06:44.800 and the fact that we're paying them how much do you love the fact that we're paying trump well
00:06:52.220 actually we're not he i believe he's not taking a salary right i don't remember if he said it this
00:06:57.920 term but i i think it's automatic he's not taking it so we're not paying him per se except for you know
00:07:04.340 it costs a lot for secret service etc but we're getting a really good value because we're getting
00:07:11.240 we're getting elon musk for free i mean how how often does that happen for free and so if you do
00:07:22.080 that much stuff you've got that much energy you got that much action you've got that much alpha male
00:07:27.320 stuff you're working for free we're getting we're getting a bargain we love bargains especially when
00:07:34.380 they're uncovering all the bad things that we're paying for but on top of all of that i think the
00:07:40.900 media brainwashing machine is broken i think trump broke it it took a long time and we all had to
00:07:47.960 help but once you realize that the media is not trying to give you the news that's really the
00:07:54.580 secret if you think well they're trying to give you the straight news but yeah everybody makes a
00:07:59.980 mistake if you're in that model you have no idea what's going on no the news is not trying to give
00:08:07.480 you the news you know there may be some entities that are trying but mostly you know your your big
00:08:16.460 entities we know for sure they're not trying to give you the real news it's always a it's always a
00:08:23.560 narrative anyway so here's something i love i love the fact that calling out the brainwashing techniques
00:08:33.700 that the news is using you know the little propaganda tricks it's become a parlor game
00:08:38.940 now compare this to 2016 in 2016 we simply thought there were two opinions well there's the opinion on
00:08:48.260 the left and there's opinion on the right and they're different yeah we understand that that's why
00:08:54.180 there's a left and the right different opinions but over time we learned that what we were observing
00:09:00.080 wasn't just a different of a difference of opinion what we learned was the news isn't real
00:09:07.300 and once you realize the news isn't real then you can start looking for the technique and have you
00:09:14.580 noticed how delightful it is that um you know i i would say that people like mike cernovich people like
00:09:22.720 me have been pointing out technique for years but somehow collectively and other people of course
00:09:30.300 it's not just us but uh collectively the entire right-leaning part of the world has been educated on
00:09:38.200 the tricks let me give you an example so caitlin collins cnn um she said uh recently quote we are three
00:09:46.000 two weeks into the second trump presidency three weeks and tonight there are warnings that the u.s is
00:09:52.340 dangerously close to a constitutional crisis there are warnings do you know what the warnings are
00:09:58.440 well according to john podritz um who who apparently is up to speed on the propaganda tricks
00:10:08.020 he explains what the quote warnings are about the constitutional crisis so he goes uh so this is
00:10:17.900 how it works the new york times does a story in which leftist professors say there's a constitutional
00:10:23.940 crisis and six hours later cnn does a story saying there are warnings which is technically true
00:10:32.200 because there's there were warnings right there in the new york times but it's simply just an
00:10:37.300 extension of a party ideological line from one media institution through another now that's a
00:10:43.200 standard trick so that first the democrats will plant a story with a friendly reporter and then the
00:10:50.380 rest of the press will treat it like it must be important and substantial because it's in the other
00:10:56.580 press well if it's in the new york times so watching uh john podritz uh call that out was very satisfying
00:11:06.640 to me because the more you learn to spot this stuff the better off we're going to be so it's just a sign
00:11:15.340 of good health that we can call this out and laugh at it it gets better um and i would even go so far as
00:11:23.160 that we've just πraud so what john was doing was just pointing out you know how the propaganda um
00:11:29.800 architecture works but because it's on x and x you know will give you follows and reposts and you know
00:11:40.260 if you wanted to you could even monetize it so there's actually a reward so we've literally gamified
00:11:46.860 gamified the process of calling out the propaganda. And it's fun. And not only is it fun,
00:11:54.760 you might get paid for it if you've monetized your account. So related to this, I saw a story
00:12:02.720 in the Wall Street Journal that Steve Bannon's war room, and so this would include Steve Bannon
00:12:09.120 and one of his co-hosts, I don't know how many co-hosts he has, but his co-host, Natalie Winters,
00:12:14.540 they both keep MSNBC on all day. So MSNBC would be the opposite of their point of view.
00:12:23.800 And they keep it on all day. Do you know why? They don't really watch the conservative media that
00:12:32.540 much. They just keep MSNBC kind of locked on. Because it's hilarious. It's for the jokes.
00:12:40.280 It's so that you can make fun of them. Because they're so ridiculous that I keep it on all day,
00:12:48.660 too. Now, actually, I usually flip through and I spend a lot of time. I watch MSNBC for the laughs.
00:12:56.860 And that's not a joke. It's not hyperbole. Once you realize that they're not even trying to be any
00:13:02.320 kind of a news network, once you realize its only intention is propaganda, then it gets fun.
00:13:09.960 And we're going to have a little fun with them in a little bit. So yeah, I watch them for the same
00:13:14.420 reason, just to watch how the propaganda works and see what they're up to. And I do watch MSNBC more
00:13:21.240 than, probably more than I watch conservative media. I mean, I sample everything, but I'll bet I spend more
00:13:28.780 time watching MSNBC because I'm just fascinated by the technique. So Joy Reid on MSNBC, I guess she said
00:13:41.140 today, or it might have been yesterday, that the Doge employee named Big Balls, you know, that was
00:13:47.940 his name online at one point, Big Balls, must be subpoenaed. Now, why does subpoena have to have
00:13:57.060 pina in it? Because it feels like subpoena means whatever's below your pina, and what's below your
00:14:05.280 pina is your big balls. I don't know, is it just me? And then I look at Joy Reid with her short hair,
00:14:12.720 you know, her shaved head, and I think, why do you have to dress like the thing you're criticizing?
00:14:19.160 Do you remember when she had Trump hair? She had a Trump haircut when she was criticizing Trump all day?
00:14:24.600 I thought, that's weird. Why would you wear the hair of the thing you're criticizing? Now she's
00:14:31.100 spending all day criticizing Big Balls, and she's got her hair cut really short, so she looks like,
00:14:36.820 you know, Big Ball's left testicle. You know, it's just sort of a testicle with a face on it.
00:14:43.640 And I'll tell you, I call this whole thing scrotum gate, because scrotum is a word you don't get to
00:14:49.520 use enough. Any chance I get to say scrotum in public, I'm going to take it. I'm like,
00:14:55.220 can I say scrotum on this podcast? Scrotum. Yeah, it's just a funny word. So scrotum gate gets better.
00:15:03.420 So here's something I've noticed, and I want to see if you've noticed it too.
00:15:08.940 Do you notice that the people on CNN, I'm going to know just two of them in particular,
00:15:13.680 Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid, have one thing in common that is the strangest thing to have in
00:15:20.560 common. They don't blink their eyes at the same time. In other words, each of them has two eyes,
00:15:27.540 and here would be a normal person blinking, if you're watching. Blink, blink. See both eyes blink?
00:15:36.260 Pretty much a normal person when they blink, both of them blink.
00:15:39.480 But have you ever watched either Rachel Maddow or Joy Reid when they're on camera?
00:15:46.240 Their eyes blink, but one at a time, like they're fighting off something. It's like,
00:15:52.540 and then Trump, Trump is like a dictator. It's like 1939 Hitler.
00:16:01.940 Now, where does that come from? If you find somebody who blinks separately with each eye,
00:16:12.440 I wouldn't believe anything that comes out of their mouth,
00:16:16.060 because I don't even know what causes that. What causes you to reflexively blink separately
00:16:23.880 with each eye? I don't know. I'm not sure that's a tell for mental health or lying or what that is,
00:16:32.620 but I don't see it anywhere else. Have you ever seen that anywhere else? And two of their major
00:16:39.040 hosts do the same thing? What's up with that? Anyway, Ali Velshi, one of the MSNBC hosts,
00:16:48.760 who's Canadian. I didn't know he's Canadian, but he is. He's Canadian.
00:16:57.040 It feels like that comment has more power to it than I meant. If I say he's Canadian,
00:17:04.480 suddenly your brain fills up with all these stereotypes. And you're thinking, oh, he's a
00:17:10.000 crazy communist because, oh, he's like Trudeau. I hate the fact that five years ago, if you said
00:17:20.560 somebody is Canadian, you would have just automatically thought, oh, excellent. I'd like
00:17:27.640 to invite them over for coffee. I like Canadians. Canadians are the best. But after a few more
00:17:34.440 years of Trudeau, if you hear somebody is a Canadian, you're like, oh, I'm sorry. Sorry
00:17:40.240 about that. How's it feel? Are you OK? Do you need any help? Anyway, so Ali Velshi on MSNBC said
00:17:49.320 that, quote, blacks will be impacted most by Trump's gutting of the bureaucracy. Now, should
00:17:56.640 we dig into that? No, we don't give a shit. I'm not saying we don't give a shit about black
00:18:02.260 Americans. I'm saying we don't give a shit about his opinion. And is it true that people
00:18:09.160 who are at the lowest end of the economic situation will have some greater impact based
00:18:16.940 on what's happening now? Well, I would say that's always the case. If there's a war, people
00:18:24.380 at the low end of the economic ladder almost always get it worse. If there's a depression,
00:18:30.080 who gets it worse? If there's a pandemic, who gets it worse? So it is true, and we can't ignore
00:18:36.580 it, that the people at the low end of the economic ladder are going to get everything worse
00:18:42.320 whenever you make any big change. But to be fair, what Trump promised, maybe without saying it
00:18:50.980 directly, is that we're going to take some pain to cut the government down to a sustainable level
00:18:57.600 because you know what would happen if we just kept doing what we were doing and didn't cut
00:19:02.020 anything? We would be out of business. We would be broke. The country would crumble. Guess who gets
00:19:09.080 hurt the most when the entire country crumbles? The people at the low end of the economic ladder.
00:19:15.340 So it's, to me, just looking at this, it's more MSNBC searching for their old way of business.
00:19:25.060 Hey, I've got an idea. I don't know if anybody's thought of this before, but what if no matter what
00:19:31.860 Republicans do, we brand it as racist? Has anybody tried that yet? Oh, it's the only thing we've ever
00:19:39.200 tried. Well, what if we also make up some stuff? Okay. Okay. But wait, that's also what we've been
00:19:46.820 doing. But what if we have everybody agree that it's true? That's what you've been doing. Okay.
00:19:55.500 Okay. But what if we ignore the bad things that happen on the Democrat side? Okay. That's actually
00:20:02.500 what you've been doing. So I love their inability to learn. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold
00:20:10.940 standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style
00:20:16.620 excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned
00:20:21.860 player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access
00:20:27.400 to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games. Make the most of your
00:20:32.580 downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden
00:20:37.980 opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the
00:20:43.340 tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of
00:20:48.760 your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino?
00:20:54.740 Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario.
00:21:02.660 Eligibility restrictions apply. See goldennuggetcasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:21:09.040 Meanwhile, there's the story that you're just going to need somebody smarter to explain the next part to
00:21:15.400 you. So how many judges now have ruled against some little thing that Doge is doing or Trump is
00:21:22.840 doing? Is it five or six? I think there was another one today. There were five yesterday.
00:21:30.660 So, you know, the lawfare is just coming wildly. Now, Kyle Cheney was pointing out on X today that
00:21:39.780 Judge Amy Berman Jackson, she's the fifth judge just yesterday, just in one day, just yesterday,
00:21:46.740 five judges to block some aspect of what Trump is trying to get done with executive orders.
00:21:55.660 And here's what they're doing. They're kind of blocking common sense. As long as Trump stays in
00:22:04.520 that 80-20 mode where he's getting rid of the penny and people are saying, yeah, yeah, get rid of the
00:22:10.880 penny. He's bringing back plastic straws and people are like, oh yeah, plastic straws.
00:22:18.960 And he's trying to end the war in Ukraine. Oh yeah, let's end that war. He's trying to
00:22:23.300 cut the waste and fraud out of the government. Oh yeah, we can all agree on that. Let's get rid of
00:22:29.140 the waste and fraud. So as long as he stays in that 80%-ish mode, watching Democrats try to stop
00:22:37.880 him from doing things that we all want, except for the 20% who are just bad shit crazy in every topic.
00:22:45.320 It's fun. But in this context, Elon Musk just changed his own name on his profile on X to Harry
00:22:53.960 Balls. Balls spelled B-O-L-Z. Why? Why not? Why not? Harry Balls. Okay.
00:23:05.720 And then Musk and others are pointing out that Trump isn't the only one who is considered ignoring
00:23:16.600 a court order if the court order didn't seem like it was on point. So do you remember that Biden said
00:23:24.920 when the Supreme Court blocked his idea to pay off the student loans? He said directly, Biden said,
00:23:32.480 the Supreme Court tried to block me from relieving student debt, but they didn't stop me. Blah,
00:23:37.800 blah, blah. I'm going to keep going. So Biden said it directly. The Supreme Court ruled against me,
00:23:43.480 but I'm going to try to thwart their ruling by finding some clever workaround.
00:23:50.120 All right. I mean, I'm open-minded that maybe it was a workaround. I mean, if it literally doesn't go
00:23:57.740 against the Supreme Court ruling and yet defeats the, you know, let's say the intent of it,
00:24:04.340 that might be legal. So I'm no expert. I don't know. But it's sketchy and it seems inappropriate.
00:24:14.940 I mean, why would you try to get around a Supreme Court ruling? That just feels like the wrong move if
00:24:20.780 you're the leader of the country. But here's a Laura Loomer scoop. Laura Loomer is the best at
00:24:31.020 coming up with, did you know that somebody's daughter is working for somebody else? You know,
00:24:37.620 the connections, the who's involved connections. She's really good at that. So her scoop today is
00:24:43.980 that Judge John McConnell, so that's a federal judge from Rhode Island who ordered Trump and Doge to
00:24:50.700 unfreeze billions of dollars in federal grants that, you know, were things that Doge was trying to
00:24:56.980 stop. And did you know that this judge, according to Laura Loomer, as a daughter who currently works at
00:25:04.720 the U.S. Department of Education as a senior policy advisor? So the judge who doesn't want
00:25:13.160 things such as, for example, the Department of Education to be closed, has a daughter who's got a
00:25:23.180 job there. Now, I think Elon Musk mentioned that it might be a fake job. Does this sound like a real
00:25:30.480 job being a senior policy advisor at the U.S. Department of Education? Not really. It doesn't
00:25:38.840 really sound like a real job to me, because don't you think you could get pretty good advice just by
00:25:44.780 asking around? Like, why would you even pay for that? How much is the daughter getting paid to give
00:25:51.820 advice to an entity that's never made a difference in anybody's lives, at least in terms of the test scores
00:25:59.500 hasn't approved the test scores? So kind of good to know, the network of connections. I love the fact
00:26:07.660 that everything that's going on now with Doge is revealing the networks. So now you can see who's
00:26:14.240 connected. You can see all the bad actors, because they all have to come out, because they're the only
00:26:19.600 ones that are going to fight to protect the corruption. Like, who else is going to argue in
00:26:24.300 public? In public? Who else is going to argue in public to keep the corruption? Only the
00:26:30.940 benefactors. Like, nobody else is going to make that argument. That would be crazy, unless they're
00:26:35.820 blackmailers. So here's some more cuts made by Doge. Apparently, there was something called the
00:26:44.200 Norwegian Refugee Council. There's a Norwegian Refugee Council. And they've announced that they're
00:26:55.580 suspending their activities in almost 20 countries. The Norwegian Refugee Council was working in 20
00:27:01.820 countries due to the USAID freeze imposed by Trump. So USAID was paying the Norwegian Refugee Council
00:27:14.020 to operate in 20 countries. These sound like jokes, don't they? Doesn't it sound like I just made
00:27:22.400 that up? The Norwegian Refugee Council had to close down? Well, it gets worse. You know, now that the
00:27:31.080 Norwegian Refugee Council is closed, I feel like Doge is going to go after next, maybe the Swedish
00:27:37.500 Dingleberry Freedom Council. Because if the Swedish Dingleberry Freedom Council doesn't get their USAID
00:27:46.240 funding, how can they continue to bring their Dingleberry message to all the other countries?
00:27:52.840 Can you tell which one I made up? Which one's not real? The Norwegian Refugee Council or the Swedish
00:28:00.460 Dingleberry Freedom Council? Which one did I just make up? It's called satire, folks. Satire. And if you
00:28:08.080 were here at the beginning, you know that satire is far more damaging than regular boring criticisms that
00:28:14.860 you'll see on other podcasts. No. Satire. Boom. Bringing it home. Well, the JFK files may be fun.
00:28:27.620 Apparently, there were 2,400 undisclosed records that have now been disclosed. At least disclosed
00:28:35.900 that they exist. They're not disclosed in terms of their contents. But we expect that it might be
00:28:40.720 coming. So, anybody want to place any bets on what we learned about the JFK assassination? I'm going to
00:28:49.680 put my money on nothing. Nothing. We're not going to learn anything. Do you believe that the
00:28:56.760 government of the United States may have been involved in assassinating a president and they
00:29:03.640 left a memo about it? It was a memo? Oh, let's find the recordings where they were planning it.
00:29:12.600 No. They couldn't. This is just a prediction. Now, I could be wrong, which would be really fun.
00:29:20.940 I would love to be wrong. I'd love to be wrong about this and about UFOs, but I don't think there's
00:29:29.300 any chance we're going to learn some shocking new thing about who killed Kennedy. We might learn some
00:29:35.240 shocking new things about how the government operates, but I don't know if we're going to find
00:29:40.340 out from the files who killed them. And if we did, would you trust it? Suppose deep down in the files,
00:29:48.460 somewhere it said, oh, we found out that it was Russia all along. Would you believe that? I wouldn't.
00:29:56.600 If it said, you know, we didn't want to tell the country, but it was really China. China was behind
00:30:02.880 it. Would you believe that? I wouldn't. Suppose they said it was Israel. Israel was behind it.
00:30:12.420 Well, that would be convenient because people would be, you know, sort of primed to believe that
00:30:18.860 because that's one of the conspiracy theories here the most. But would you believe it? I might say to
00:30:25.840 myself, well, that's convenient. Kind of convenient to blame it on another country. If you happen to be
00:30:31.400 the ones that did it, wouldn't it be nice to have some other country to blame? So even if it were
00:30:36.440 true, I wouldn't believe it because I saw it in a memo that's been buried for 60 years or whatever.
00:30:43.840 So how could we possibly learn anything that would be both believable and new? I'm going to say
00:30:53.340 nothing. I think nothing's coming. I really do. Just nothing. But it'll be fun.
00:30:59.420 Meanwhile, there's a report that Trump may have dispatched his special envoy, Steve Whitkoff,
00:31:08.080 to Moscow. That's based on looking at some jet action. I guess there's a jet that he is known to
00:31:18.460 be sometimes on and maybe he's on it and it's heading to Moscow. So we'll wait for that. I would
00:31:25.800 expect that Trump and Putin, maybe through intermediaries, maybe not, probably are well
00:31:34.500 along on negotiating. I'll bet they're halfway there at least. And I think both of them want
00:31:42.800 to find a solution. But we'll talk more about Ukraine in a minute.
00:31:49.800 Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:31:54.420 Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,
00:32:00.260 you're richer than you think. Meanwhile, apparently the Trump Department of Justice
00:32:07.980 is dropping the charges. We're recommending dropping them, which looks like it's going to work.
00:32:14.980 Dropping charges against Eric Adams, Mayor Adams of New York. No relation.
00:32:19.600 So he was accused of taking illegal campaign contributions from Turkey and accepting $100,000
00:32:27.840 in travel and hotel perks in exchange for official acts. Now, the things we know are that Turkey asked
00:32:35.040 them when their building would be ready. And he asked the fire department, when's that building
00:32:41.320 going to be ready? Now, is that more than he would have done for any other constituent? I hope not.
00:32:50.340 That should be exactly what he would do for every constituent. If somebody has a big, expensive
00:32:56.120 building and they can't move into it in New York City and there's a bureaucratic delay,
00:33:02.760 is that not appropriate to talk to the mayor's office and say, hey, mayor's office, is there somebody
00:33:08.180 you could talk to to get this going? Because we'd like to bring a whole bunch of people in. They're
00:33:12.260 going to eat lunch. They're going to spend money in your city. Of course he should make that phone call.
00:33:17.700 Of course he should. And then later when he's traveling, the accusation is he got some of his
00:33:27.760 travel upgraded. Maybe a better hotel room, maybe a better seat on the plane. Is that a crime?
00:33:39.420 Well, what do you think happens to public dignitaries no matter when they travel?
00:33:46.300 Do you think that somebody like Mayor Adams wouldn't get automatic upgrades no matter what
00:33:51.440 he was doing? And the fact that it happens in the context of somebody being happy with him doing his
00:33:57.220 job as the mayor, exactly the job a mayor should do, make sure the bureaucracy is not stopping the
00:34:02.560 economy. This is pretty weak stuff. It looks like lawfare. And it happened very quickly after Mayor
00:34:11.240 Adams became a critic of Biden's immigration policy. Because he would be a really powerful voice
00:34:18.980 because he's a, you know, he's a Democrat running the biggest city that's the most impacted, it seemed
00:34:24.860 like. And he was dangerous, dangerous to the Biden administration because he was being honest about
00:34:32.720 a real problem. So in, uh, in, I guess, dropping the charges, I think it's official by now that they've
00:34:41.940 dropped him. Um, the Trump administration would be signaling that he was a victim of lawfare.
00:34:49.540 And in their, in their communication, they basically say that it's a little too sketchy
00:34:55.020 that these weak charges came right after he became a critic of immigration. It's a little too
00:35:01.300 coincidental. Now, uh, apparently he could still be charged in the future, but at the moment it looks
00:35:09.760 like he'll at least have freedom to run for reelection if that's what he wants to do. Now, how smart is it
00:35:15.720 for, I mean, I assume that Trump was sort of behind it, you know, even if he didn't say it directly,
00:35:22.680 you know, maybe the department of justice would be able to read the room and do it,
00:35:26.940 but how smart is it from Trump's perspective that this is happening? It's perfect because Trump has
00:35:33.820 made the point that the charges against him were lawfare. What could make that point better
00:35:40.900 than letting a prominent Democrat, a prominent Democrat, uh, escape, help him escape from his
00:35:51.900 lawfare problems too. And both of them being anti-immigration, the way it's being done,
00:35:58.240 or it wasn't being done. It looks like the same play. It looks like lawfare was used against them
00:36:05.360 because immigration was more important to the administration, but it gets better because he
00:36:11.480 also, uh, signed a unconditional pardon for former Illinois governor, uh, Rod Blagovich. Now I don't
00:36:20.180 know too much about the Blagovich story. Some people say he was set up some people, you know, obviously
00:36:26.480 there are going to be two sides to the story, but it also reinforces the idea that lawfare is being
00:36:34.580 used against prominent politicians. So now Trump has created a three point argument. Look what they
00:36:41.880 did to me, look what they did to somebody on their own team, just for disagreeing on one, on just one
00:36:47.780 topic, just one topic, immigration, that's it. And then look what they did in the past to, uh, Blagovich.
00:36:56.580 That really, that really solidifies that lawfare argument when you can show three points
00:37:02.920 and then, and then in the context of it, we're watching all these, um, in my opinion, corrupt
00:37:09.900 judges. They act like they're corrupt. I don't have proof of that. They just act as corrupt people
00:37:16.540 in, in the, if you're just looking at the outcome of what they're doing, you got to just shake your
00:37:22.640 head and say, that doesn't look, that doesn't look appropriate. You don't have to be any kind of
00:37:28.040 lawyer to know that what the judges are doing looks like a form of lawfare, right? So not only
00:37:34.580 is he made his lawfare argument about things that have happened in the past, but it's right in the
00:37:40.880 middle of a whole lawfare campaign against them in office. It's very, very clever that they're making
00:37:49.920 a big deal about these two cases of lawfare. Very well done. I'll tell you, uh, no matter how many
00:37:56.980 times I say this, it's worth saying again, the Trump administration has really good advisors,
00:38:05.520 but I like to tell you in every case, the boss gets all the credit because the boss has to pick
00:38:11.900 the advisors and then the boss has to decide which advice to follow, which is, I would argue the hard
00:38:17.860 part. So Trump gets all the credit, but I would be remiss if I didn't say, my God, he's getting good
00:38:27.000 advice. Um, Musk said today on X that, uh, I'm paraphrasing, but he basically said all the smart people
00:38:36.220 are, you know, are joining the Trump side of things. And I think that's true. I believe everybody's
00:38:43.000 smart is now drifting to his side, everybody's smart. And if you see somebody who has a high IQ,
00:38:52.140 but they're not, they're still resisting. They're either getting paid, you know, it's just part of
00:38:57.760 their work. And I can name lots of people who are clearly getting paid for their resistance
00:39:02.060 or they have TDS and it's literally a mental problem. But of the people who don't have a mental
00:39:09.100 problem and don't have an economic stake in being a critic, they pretty much all the smart ones have
00:39:16.900 come to the same side. You want a good example of that? Sam Altman says that Biden, just, just
00:39:26.140 recently, Sam Altman just said that the Biden administration was sort of anti-business and he
00:39:31.760 was happy to see him go. And that the Trump administration is like a breath of fresh air for
00:39:37.620 business and that everybody in the Valley feels it. Sam Altman, no matter what else, what other
00:39:44.940 problems you have about him, and we'll talk a little more about that, but whatever else you want to
00:39:49.280 say, everybody agrees he's smart and he doesn't seem to be crazy. Right. And nobody's paying him to
00:39:55.720 be a Biden supporter. Everybody smart is on the same side unless they have mental illness or they're
00:40:03.500 being paid. We really are at that point where I don't think there's an exception. The reflexive
00:40:11.600 people like Larry Summers and like that, I don't take them seriously because they're sort of deeply in
00:40:17.520 the game, but the people who are not in the game, all the smart ones are on the same side. If you can find
00:40:24.160 an exception, let me know. I don't know of any. There are people who are quiet, but that's
00:40:32.500 different. Anyway, as Trump just pointed out, California just finished counting the votes for
00:40:38.660 2024. What? That's right. Remember the 2024 election? It seems like it was years ago because
00:40:49.500 we're moving at Trump's speed at the moment. California just finished counting. Now they had
00:40:59.160 declared the winners before because I guess they were sure it wouldn't change the result,
00:41:04.000 but they were still counting. What? All right. So let me show a contrast between what made sense in
00:41:14.340 2020 and what makes sense today. Do you remember 2020? It was so long ago. In 2020, if you questioned
00:41:22.300 an American election result, you would be considered to be an election denier and possibly an insurrectionist.
00:41:31.840 So you might've been a Russian stooge or some kind of a traitor, but at the very least,
00:41:40.120 you're an election denier election deniers. My God, just, just even having that opinion that our
00:41:49.620 immaculate election systems could be in any way compromised. What kind of a fool, what kind of a
00:41:57.500 insurrectionist, dangerous Russian puppet fool are you? That's 2020. You want to fast forward to 2025
00:42:06.360 2025 with me? 2025. Here's what that argument looks like today. So after learning, as we have all
00:42:19.340 learned, because we're following Doge, et cetera. So after learning that nearly every government agency
00:42:25.080 is corrupt, is that fair? Am I going too far so far that we've learned that nearly, and maybe it's
00:42:33.980 everyone, but we can say for sure, nearly every government organization is corrupt. And fundamentally,
00:42:41.080 not just a little bit, fundamentally. I mean, FEMA's sending money for the immigration and then lying
00:42:49.580 about it. Apparently the people involved in that are getting fired today. Thank you. So once you've
00:42:55.140 learned that every major agency in the government from, you know, Congress, and then also outside the
00:43:04.400 government, you got your health cares, God knows what. By the way, did you see the study? There was a
00:43:12.820 study of 52 of the most landmark studies in cancer. Landmark studies, meaning that everybody would look at
00:43:21.760 these group of 52 studies and say, these are the ones that are, you know, credible and they will
00:43:28.420 inform how we treat cancer. 52 of them. So somebody tried to reproduce them. How many of the 52 landmark
00:43:38.080 healthcare studies do you think were reproducible? 11%. 89% were not real in the sense that they couldn't be
00:43:48.900 reproduced. 89%. That was driving our cancer decisions for years, if not decades. It might have
00:44:00.180 been decades. Now that's healthcare. Healthcare is something you would expect would be the most
00:44:07.380 free from that kind of effect. But in fact, it's completely marinating in it. What about our,
00:44:15.340 you know, what about finance? What, you know, I could go on and on, right? Everything looks corrupt.
00:44:21.920 So in 2025, after learning that nearly every agent, government agency, and really every big entity
00:44:28.460 everywhere is mostly corrupt, believing that our elections are the one fair thing in that environment
00:44:35.560 makes you a fucking idiot. So let me say it again. If you think our elections are not rigged,
00:44:41.340 you're a fucking idiot. In 2020, maybe it was a jump ball. You know, maybe you had an argument,
00:44:50.600 but the argument against it was seemingly winning in the public domain. But let me say it again.
00:44:55.980 If you still think that everything in the country is corrupt, except our election systems,
00:45:03.220 you're a fucking idiot. Now, that doesn't mean it is corrupt. It just means if you believe it like
00:45:13.580 it's a fact, you're a fucking idiot. Now, do I have proof that it's corrupt? Of course not.
00:45:22.100 That's not how anything works. Do you know I didn't have proof that USAID was corrupt until
00:45:27.200 five minutes ago? I didn't have proof that FEMA was giving American money to immigrants until five
00:45:37.600 minutes ago, right? So if today, knowing that, in fact, yesterday, yesterday, I didn't know that 89%
00:45:48.020 of cancer studies were fake. Yesterday. I didn't know that yesterday. Well, that's a lie. I didn't know
00:45:54.920 that. Actually, I did know that. But I knew that you didn't know it. I've done a deeper dive than
00:46:01.620 I've talked about so far. Yeah, I knew that they were fake, or most of them. I already knew that. But
00:46:07.880 most people didn't. So today, in this context, when you're watching your president be law-fared by
00:46:16.260 corrupt judges, do you remember when you thought, well, at least the judges, you know, in this country,
00:46:22.160 our judges are usually pretty fair? No, they're not. No, the judges are so corrupt that they're
00:46:28.860 literally shutting down the country over politics and trying to make it look like there's a law. No,
00:46:34.360 everything is corrupt. The judges, the healthcare, the finance, the government, the Congress,
00:46:41.520 blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, USAID, blah, blah, blah, blah, agencies, blah, blah, blah, the Treasury.
00:46:46.400 The Treasury wasn't even looking at the things they were spending money on. The Social Security
00:46:53.840 system didn't check multiple entries using the same Social Security number, the most basic thing you
00:47:00.340 would check if you were trying to check. Our systems are designed so you can be corrupt.
00:47:08.280 They're designed to be corrupt. And it's obvious from the design. Nobody would build an election system
00:47:14.200 like ours from scratch if what they were trying to do is have a credible, accurate system.
00:47:21.260 Nobody would build this one. Not even close. So yeah, if you think that there's no chance that our
00:47:29.000 elections are rigged, you're a fucking idiot. You're just a fucking idiot. There's just no way around
00:47:35.480 that at this point. Don't get me started on climate models. All right. So if our elections
00:47:43.160 are rigged, somebody who is an NPC is going to say, Scott, Scott, if you say the elections are rigged,
00:47:49.240 watch me use satire here. Satire coming in hard. Oh, Scott. Oh, if you say the elections are rigged,
00:47:57.960 how do you explain that Trump won in 2016? And then how do you explain that he won again in 2024?
00:48:04.260 Scott, explain that. Explain that. Okay. Too big to rig. In 2016, the polls said he was definitely
00:48:13.040 going to lose. No rigging necessary. Surprise. The shy Trump supporters pulled it over the finish line.
00:48:21.540 In 2024, it literally was too big to rig. It was just too big. And we were watching too closely.
00:48:29.680 We knew exactly where to watch. The observers were everywhere. That might've been the closest
00:48:35.960 thing to an accurate election we've had. But of course, I assume there was a little bit of rigging
00:48:42.680 going on. So yes, you can win if you overwhelm the system. So the way Trump overwhelmed the system
00:48:50.180 with votes is the way he's overwhelming the fake media with so many stories that the media can't
00:48:57.120 keep up. So overwhelming is a strategy and it works against corruption because corruption is a little
00:49:04.980 slow and he can just overwhelm the corruption. Claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament.
00:49:11.060 I've been visualizing my match all week. She was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the
00:49:16.300 column behind her car on her backhand side. Good thing Claudia's with Intact, the insurer with the
00:49:22.460 largest network of auto service centers in the country. Everything was taken care of under one
00:49:26.900 roof and she was on her way in a rental car in no time. I made it to my tournament and lost in the
00:49:32.340 first round. But you got there on time. Intact Insurance, your auto service ace. Certain conditions apply.
00:49:38.560 All right. In other news, just because Elon Musk apparently isn't busy enough, he's making a bid for
00:49:49.120 open AI. So he put together some investors and together they're making a bid to buy open AI for
00:49:57.140 97.4 billion. Now, this gets a little complicated. You might know that open AI was originally funded
00:50:05.300 by Musk and even named it open AI because his intention was to make it a publicly available
00:50:13.260 open source kind of AI to benefit the world. At some point, Sam Altman and whoever else was aboard
00:50:23.280 decided to turn it into a for-profit and team up with Microsoft and et cetera. But they have not
00:50:34.200 completed the transition from the non-profit to the profit model. And apparently that is being valued
00:50:44.900 at around $40 billion or something. So while they're trying to work out the complexity and getting
00:50:53.420 everybody happy with the fact that they could change from a non-profit to a profit, which again
00:50:58.120 is a little technical and it's hard for me to explain the ins and outs of that. But during
00:51:04.040 that period where they're trying to make that decision, in comes a bid that would value at
00:51:10.400 that way more than $40 billion, like almost, well, more than double. So more than double.
00:51:17.360 Now, if you're on the board of directors of open AI and you've got one offer for $40 billion,
00:51:24.700 and it's that Microsoft Sam Altman idea, and then suddenly there's another one that comes in
00:51:29.940 for more than twice as much. Does the board have an obligation? Well, they do have an obligation to
00:51:37.600 stop what they're doing and consider it. So considering it, I think, is built into being
00:51:44.240 on the board. I don't think they have a chance. I don't think they have a choice of not at least
00:51:49.020 voting on it and internally considering it, because that's what a board's supposed to do.
00:51:53.640 So now, either Altman's deal will have the problem of trying to decide, why doesn't Microsoft have to
00:52:03.620 pay $97 billion? Why would their investors, I don't know if it's all from Microsoft, but why would
00:52:10.240 the investors in one way be paying $40 billion when there's somebody else who's going to pay more than
00:52:17.220 twice that? So it complicates things, and it's not clear what the entire goal is, because Musk has
00:52:25.220 already created a whole competing AI that has the best data centers, at least, which gives you
00:52:31.500 some thought that it might be the best AI at one point. So why would he do this? Well, some of it
00:52:39.520 might be personal. I don't know. But he's got other investors involved, which suggests that it at least
00:52:45.880 makes sense from a business perspective. Otherwise, the others wouldn't be involved, I think.
00:52:52.180 So this got really interesting. Now, some of it looks personal, because the way Altman and Musk
00:52:59.100 talk about each other is clearly personal. And Musk calls Altman a liar, and Altman says that Musk
00:53:07.960 must have some, I don't know, some problems from his childhood he's trying to work through.
00:53:14.200 So they both have this unflattering view of the other. And it makes me wonder how much
00:53:19.360 is personal. But at the very least, it's going to slow down open AI. So Musk is a competitor
00:53:27.220 with his own AI, and he's just threw this big turd in the punch bowl. So now they've got to figure
00:53:33.200 out what to do with the punch bowl, which should slow them down a little bit. And maybe that's the
00:53:40.520 second way to win. Maybe one way to win is to buy it. And the second way to win is to slow it down.
00:53:49.100 And along with slowing it down, it might make it too expensive for their investors to get involved
00:53:55.580 and might cause a whole fight over there. So it could be that he's just causing some trouble
00:54:01.000 for a competitor. But I would think that he wouldn't do that alone. Meaning that it probably
00:54:08.120 makes sense from a business perspective that if they said yes and sold it, he could probably make
00:54:13.840 something of that pretty quickly. All right. Maybe $97 billion is worth it just to get their
00:54:20.660 technical staff. You know, you remember Silicon Valley used to buy companies and then get rid of
00:54:27.300 the product of the company and just keep the engineers because it was the cheapest way to
00:54:31.020 buy engineers that were the best engineers. So maybe the cheapest way to buy the best AI people
00:54:37.240 is that you just overpay for the entire company and then you get the engineers. I don't know.
00:54:45.920 Except I don't know if the engineers are working for the nonprofits. I'm not exactly sure how the
00:54:52.740 structure is right now. So I can't get too much deeper. Anyway, thing I love about Doge, as I
00:54:59.820 mentioned, is it reveals the whole network of the most corrupt people in the government. So here are
00:55:06.580 the names that are fighting the hardest to stop the reduction of waste. Can you imagine being forced
00:55:17.120 to be on the team that's favoring corruption and waste? Because that's, I think the entire public
00:55:24.660 understands that Doge is getting rid of waste and corruption. Now, the other team might have a whole
00:55:33.580 different narrative of, oh, Musk is really trying to get power for himself and he's really trying to make
00:55:42.320 profits. So he's attacking the people who would be a problem for him and the government, blah, blah,
00:55:47.160 blah. But I think most Americans see Doge coming out every day and saying, look, we just saved you
00:55:54.900 another 10 billion. Well, just saved you another 100 billion. Whoops. Do you really want to be funding
00:56:00.000 the Swedish dingleberry team? No, we don't. Well, saved you another billion. So it seems like that's
00:56:07.020 such a strong story and everybody is just normally, we're all against corruption. There's no pro-corruption
00:56:15.340 except the ones who are benefiting from it. So when you see these characters, you know that they're
00:56:22.040 the worst of the worst, the ones who are on the pro-corruption side of things. So here's the people
00:56:28.320 we see the most. Schumer, Adam Schiff, duh. Elizabeth Warren, duh. Jamie Raskin.
00:56:40.480 Now, Goldman and Maxine Waters join, of course. Now, that's really a good indication.
00:56:50.640 If I told you that these same people were on the same side of any topic, what would you say?
00:56:56.160 Why? Why would Schumer, Schiff, Warren, Raskin and Goldman and Waters be on the same side?
00:57:05.520 Only when it's corrupt. You wouldn't be able to bring together this group of people except for
00:57:13.360 corruption to protect it. So this would be a group that would favor, that would argue in favor of,
00:57:19.920 let's say, the 51 intel people and the laptop. This would be the same group that would tell you
00:57:25.760 that Russia collusion was real. It's the same group that tells you that January 6th was an
00:57:31.000 insurrection. It's always the same group. So once you realize that when this group of,
00:57:39.720 to me, it looks like they're obviously corrupt, but you can draw your own conclusions. But when you
00:57:45.420 see this cast, the characters, they're not really trying to be useful and helpful and honest.
00:57:54.420 They don't do that. These are the designated liars. The people who, the worst people who will tell any
00:58:02.340 lie and they'll tell it in public. Even if they get debunked, they'll just keep telling it. So they're
00:58:08.020 the most shameless people. And when you see them, you can know that whatever they're pushing is BS.
00:58:15.900 Well, Trump has warned Hamas that the releasing of the prisoners, which had been already agreed,
00:58:22.460 not all of them, but some subset, it looked like Hamas was dragging their feet and they were asking
00:58:29.200 for some more demands or they're complaining about Israel in some way. So that's being slowed down.
00:58:35.900 Trump has warned that unless Hamas frees all the hostages held in Gaza by Saturday,
00:58:43.120 and when he says all the hostages, I think he means not just the ones that we agreed to release.
00:58:48.920 I think he means all the hostages. He says, unless they're all freed by Saturday,
00:58:55.240 that, quote, as far as I'm concerned, if all the hostages aren't returned by Saturday at 12 o'clock,
00:59:04.020 I think it's an appropriate time. You know, he just sort of randomly picks it. I would say,
00:59:08.940 cancel it, cancel the deal that they have, and all bets are off and let hell break out.
00:59:18.020 Now, this is what I love the most about Trump. When he threatens somebody, he's not bluffing.
00:59:29.100 So they have to deal with the fact that it's not a bluff, but he also didn't say exactly what he
00:59:34.740 would do. And I would argue that what he's doing is making it easy for Israel and the United States
00:59:42.900 to never repopulate Gaza. So by not accepting this, you know, weak, trickling little agreement
00:59:51.860 and just putting the onus back on him completely. It's like, all right, either release them all or
00:59:58.140 all bets are off. All bets are off means you're never going back to Gaza. Now, that's what I think
01:00:03.980 they want anyway. I think that's what Israel and probably Trump want is that the, you know, the Hamas
01:00:10.140 part of the Gazans, which you can't really separate from the rest of the Gazans, at least not effectively,
01:00:17.920 it'd be hard to know. They're just not going back. So I think the idea that, that they will ever
01:00:24.280 resettle Gaza is kind of settled. And if Saturday, by Saturday at 12 o'clock, all the hostages are not
01:00:32.640 back, that's the end of any chance that Gaza will be resettled by the original, at least the recent
01:00:41.420 residents. I think this is his yes, no switch. I think the yes, no switch is, do you want to have
01:00:50.540 any chance, just any chance of going back to Gaza? You have to until Saturday at 12 to decide. If we
01:00:57.620 don't have, if we don't have all the hostages back, that's dead forever. It will never be an option.
01:01:04.280 Forever it will be done. Now, Trump has already said that they're not going back. But the way he
01:01:11.760 says it is, we're, you know, it takes so long to clean it up. You don't want them to wait 10 years
01:01:16.920 to go back. Rather, they should have nice homes, a nice place to live more immediately. And so he's
01:01:23.680 saying if they're already in better homes 10 years from now, why would they leave? Because they'll be in
01:01:29.460 a better place. And they might be there in a year, as opposed to 10 years. So that's a good argument
01:01:35.060 where, you know, it's a carrot and a stick. So the carrot is, hey, how about we put you in nice places
01:01:40.940 fairly quickly? The stick is, if we don't get all the hostages back by noon, you get nothing.
01:01:48.600 And maybe that includes not building nice houses now. So here's what
01:01:56.780 here's what I think is going on.
01:02:02.380 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners, I started wondering,
01:02:08.260 is every fabulous item I see from Winners? Like that woman over there with the designer jeans.
01:02:14.020 Are those from Winners? Ooh, or those beautiful gold earrings? Did she pay full price? Or that leather
01:02:19.820 tote? Or that cashmere sweater? Or those knee-high boots? That dress? That jacket? Those shoes?
01:02:25.160 Is anyone paying full price for anything? Stop wondering. Start winning. Winners. Find fabulous
01:02:31.940 for less. I think the only way that the Gaza resident situation can be solved is if it gets
01:02:41.560 reframed as a mental health problem. If you took a whole bunch of people and you put them in Gaza and
01:02:48.480 you brainwashed them for years that they're victims and they've got to go kill other people to make up
01:02:56.920 for it, would you not be giving them PTSD and mental health problems? So even if they were born with
01:03:03.740 normal brains, if you just put them in one area and propagandize them and threaten them and you make
01:03:10.980 them live in this bad situation and you just carpet bomb them with ideas about, it's the Jews, it's the
01:03:18.620 Jews, Israel's the problem, would they not have mental health PTSD, like genuine mental health problems,
01:03:26.380 like actual health problems? I say yes. But we're not allowed to say that because that would be
01:03:32.760 sort of insulting and dismissive of thousands of years of Palestinian history. But it's also true.
01:03:42.240 It's a mental health problem. And you can't solve a mental health problem with a house,
01:03:47.400 which is what we're trying to do. How about we give you a house? I have PTSD. But what about a nice
01:03:55.980 house? Still have PTSD. I still have mental health problems. But what if it's a nice house in another
01:04:03.440 country? No. How about a nice house sooner than it could have happened? No. No, the house is not the
01:04:12.020 problem. Your house is not going to fix my brain. My brain is full of hate and PTSD. And it was PTSD
01:04:21.000 before Gaza was attacked. Before October 7th, it was PTSD. Imagine what it is now. So here's the way.
01:04:29.660 I think you have to take a page from, I hate to say it, China. They treat the Uyghurs like they're a
01:04:37.560 virus. I don't like that part because I don't like treating people like they're just carriers of a virus.
01:04:44.100 But it is the only thing that China thinks they can do, because if they let Islam grow within China,
01:04:51.760 it's not a compatible system. So I'm not defending it, because I'd love the Uyghurs to have a good
01:04:58.540 life. I'm just describing it. So China has this, you could say, evil and cruel approach to it. But
01:05:07.440 they don't have a better idea. That's the problem. What's the better idea? Just let them spread Islam
01:05:15.900 and have a problem down the road? That's not a good idea. So what could you do to reframe it as a
01:05:23.400 mental health problem? Well, you could start by saying, we'd love to resettle some Palestinians
01:05:31.420 back in Gaza once it's rebuilt. But it's going to take 10 years. And during that 10 years,
01:05:38.780 if anybody wants free mental health counseling, we'll provide it. And if in the course of that
01:05:46.200 mental health counseling, we determine that we've cured you, and you can see the full picture now,
01:05:53.160 you can see that sometimes Israel did some things you don't like, and maybe they really did.
01:05:58.040 And maybe everything's broken. And maybe it's not your fault. And maybe you don't need to go fix it.
01:06:09.160 Maybe you're a victim of the brainwashing, etc. So the question would be, if you had hypnotists and
01:06:17.020 therapists, and you said, here's the doorway to resettle where you wanted to live. You've got to
01:06:24.060 get through the therapists and the mental health professionals, and they have to certify that
01:06:30.380 you're mentally healthy enough to live among a diverse group of people. If you can't live in a
01:06:37.460 diverse group of people, and it's because your just brain won't let you, you're not ready. So you're
01:06:44.580 going to have to stay with all the other people who have the same problem because you're dangerous
01:06:48.020 on the outside. The reason we have mental institutions is because some, well, or we used
01:06:54.000 to, is because some people are just too dangerous to be on the street. Now, do we say that those
01:06:59.620 people are the bad guys? Not really. I mean, if you're fair about it, somebody who has extreme
01:07:06.260 mental illness, if they're acting in a way you don't like, it's hard for me to say it's their fault,
01:07:12.300 except that the legal system has to hold them responsible to some degree. But if we treat
01:07:20.620 the refugees from Gaza as people who have been mentally damaged by their keepers, by Hamas,
01:07:31.860 then you can treat them with compassion, and you can give them a pathway to join the diverse real
01:07:38.960 world. But you also have now a perfectly good system for preventing the worst of them from ever
01:07:46.380 leaving whatever area that they're contained in. And that might be the only way to solve it.
01:07:52.820 Is it fair? And does it show empathy for real human beings? It does if you treat it like a mental
01:08:00.720 problem. It does. Now, the trick would be that you don't want to like convert them to another religion.
01:08:08.960 A little too far. But you might have to put some dents in what they believe about their current
01:08:15.440 extreme version of their religion. And you might need to bring in, you know, trained persuaders who
01:08:21.740 are Islamic, you know, ones who don't want war with anybody, and have made it work to make peace.
01:08:27.880 And let the Islamic hypnotists and the Islamic therapists, if there are any, I assume there are,
01:08:35.720 let them do the work. And let them try to save the people that they can save. But as long as you
01:08:43.520 treat it as a military problem or a security problem, nobody's going home, and nobody's going to be happy,
01:08:49.440 and there's no path. But if you treat it as a mental problem, maybe, maybe some of them can be saved.
01:08:57.660 All right. According to Tucker Carlson on his podcast, he says that he knows for sure, and he's not
01:09:08.700 guessing, that this is a fact, that Ukraine's military is selling up to half of US arms to cartels and other
01:09:17.520 bad players. Half. Half. Does that sound real? Tucker says, and he wants us, he wants to be really clear.
01:09:30.800 He's not speculating. He says he knows it. Like he's talked to the people involved. Yeah, I know it.
01:09:38.820 Well, his contacts were a lot better than mine. So if he says that, I don't think he's lying.
01:09:43.000 Now, obviously, anybody could be wrong. But it doesn't sound like he's lying. It sounds like
01:09:49.600 he has some source that he trusts. Doesn't mean you should trust it. But he has a source he trusts
01:09:55.580 that told them maybe more than one. So yeah, that's bad. I'm trying to remember the name of the
01:10:05.860 individual. Can you put it in the comments? I didn't know how to look him up just before I got on.
01:10:10.740 There's a ex-CIA person who has a book out, and he's been on a lot of podcasts. He's all over social
01:10:20.500 media. And he's kind of outing some of the practices of the CIA. Can you put his name in
01:10:28.720 the comments? Because some of you know who he is. So he's got glasses. He's been on a whole bunch of
01:10:35.640 shows. I think he's been on Sean Ryan's show, and he's been on Tucker's show, and a bunch of others.
01:10:41.500 So give me that name. All right. I thought I'd see it by now. If I see it go by, I'll say his name.
01:10:48.380 No, it's not Bucks. No, it's not Mike Benz. No, it's not one of our regular players. It's somebody
01:10:56.600 who's new. So it, no. Really? Are you not watching the same? It's not Bustamente, but that was a good
01:11:08.200 guess, because he's also ex-CIA. Really? How do you not know the name of this guy?
01:11:17.940 Okay. He's all over social media. Not one of you knows the name? Huh. Yeah. All the names you're
01:11:27.920 telling me are names that we all know, right? If it's a name that we all know, it's the wrong name.
01:11:34.280 We know Scott Ritter. We know Mike Benz. It's not him. It's not Ian Carroll. How did none of it?
01:11:42.720 Is it Elizondo? I'm blown away. Huh. Weird. Okay. Well, anyway, if I find that, I'll tweet it or
01:11:59.940 something. But he had a story about going to Afghanistan when he was in the CIA, and he
01:12:06.760 went to an area that used to be, probably used to be a food creation place, but it was all
01:12:11.540 poppy fields. And boy, we don't follow directions too well. I say it's not a name that's one of the
01:12:25.520 common ones, and the suggestion is Dan Bongino. No, it's not Dan Bongino. Stop guessing. Stop it.
01:12:35.760 Stop it. Anyway, so whoever it is, I apologize for not writing down your name, but you went to
01:12:44.400 Afghanistan, saw the fields of poppies, and then they asked, what's going on? They used to be an
01:12:49.260 exporter of food, but now Afghanistan is just growing these poppies. And he was told, now this is just his
01:12:57.500 report. That the reason that the U.S. is totally happy that Afghanistan is growing gigantic fields
01:13:06.920 of poppies, which turns into, obviously, opioids, is because almost all of it is shipped to Iran and
01:13:15.540 Russia, and that the reason we do it is to weaken their society. Now, I don't know if that's true,
01:13:24.040 somebody's saying John Kirakow. Now, that at least fits the description of a name that you're not
01:13:39.580 already all familiar with. Is that right? I'm not sure if it's him. All right, maybe it might be
01:13:48.300 Kirakow, if I'm saying it right. Anyway, do you believe that version of it? Do you believe that
01:13:56.180 the U.S. is encouraging? There he is. What's his name? Yeah. So, here's what he looks like.
01:14:09.360 So, here's the individual I'm talking about. I'm hearing his name is John Kirakow.
01:14:18.300 All right. I think we're getting close. Anyway, I apologize to you, John. I'll get your name right.
01:14:26.640 So, do you believe that? Do you believe that the U.S. is literally trying to destroy the social fabric
01:14:32.560 of Russia and Iran by making sure that Afghanistan is sending unlimited amounts of opioids to them?
01:14:40.460 I don't know. I'm going to put a pin in that one and say, an ex-CIA guy?
01:14:52.980 I'm not going to automatically believe the person whose job was professional liar.
01:15:00.900 If your job has ever been professional liar, that's what CIA is, right? You know, you have to put a pin in
01:15:09.400 and say, I'll need a little more verification. Not quite there. But that's a scary one.
01:15:18.980 Apparently, the NOAA, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Association, right? So, they're the ones who are
01:15:31.060 main agency for climate change and weather and stuff. And I guess Trump wants to cut their budget
01:15:41.040 and maybe reduce their staff from 12,000 to 6,000. Now, you know what I'm going to say.
01:15:50.500 So, if all of our climate change policies are driven by climate models,
01:15:57.260 wouldn't it be weird if we could go years and years and years and I, at least I, who watch the news and
01:16:08.860 podcasts all the time, I've never seen anybody who was involved in making a climate model who was asked
01:16:15.680 questions about how you do it and how reliable is it and is your data good and what assumptions do
01:16:21.420 you put into that? Doesn't that seem weird? Let me say it again. The climate models are driving
01:16:30.380 trillions of dollars of expense and they're very controversial in the sense of, you know, are they
01:16:36.520 real or are they not real? And yet, there's no news entity, no podcast, which has ever had somebody on
01:16:45.420 say, okay, you make models. Yours is one of the famous ones. Tell us what assumptions went into it.
01:16:51.780 How many variables are involved? Have you ever had to update it? If you modified it, why did you think
01:16:58.420 it was right before? If it was right before, but then you added some new assumptions and now you say
01:17:06.180 it's right, well, you were just as confident before, before you adjusted it. So, how can you be sure you're
01:17:14.700 right? Just think about all the questions that I would ask. Yeah, we're getting a confirmation. It's
01:17:21.560 John Kiriakou. Kiriakou. So, sorry, John. Anyway, so as long as the dog is not barking and the dog is
01:17:34.000 no climate model creators are ever on TV or are ever asked the question and they are the most important
01:17:41.800 people behind trillions of dollars of expense. So, instead, we talk to the politicians. Do you know
01:17:48.920 what the politicians say? Why would you ask me that question, you science denier? And we're done here.
01:17:56.600 You tell me, can you come up with any reason that for years the news ignores the people who make the
01:18:04.900 climate models? Like there's not one of them who can talk in public to defend trillions of dollars
01:18:12.520 of policy? That's the biggest dog that's ever not barked. And how many of you didn't notice?
01:18:21.940 We act like whoever makes the models, that must be good and those must be accurate. Now let's talk to
01:18:28.400 the politicians. No, you're making me think past the sale. If I'm talking to the politician,
01:18:35.280 I've already accepted that maybe the science was right. But if you haven't accepted that the science
01:18:42.880 is right, the climate model part, not the science in general, but just the climate models,
01:18:48.400 you need to go back to that. Let's find out if the models are right and then we'll talk to the
01:18:53.860 politicians. But you got to do the models first. Nobody will do that. Well, Trump signed some order
01:19:02.760 according to CNBC that's going to pause enforcement of the foreign bribery ban. So the United States made
01:19:11.520 it illegal to bribe other countries for business reasons, even though the government itself bribes
01:19:17.660 other countries to do coups all the time. But it was illegal for Americans to do it, but not
01:19:23.780 so illegal for other company countries to do it. So what would be the common sense way to handle
01:19:29.840 that? Okay. Common sense. All the other countries we're competing with are bribing. Bribing is how
01:19:37.560 you get anything done in some countries, too many of them really. We will be a weak, bad country if our
01:19:45.880 economy fails. And the only way to compete is by bribe bribing people in other countries.
01:19:52.940 What would be the common sense way to handle that? To allow bribing in other countries.
01:19:59.380 Now, I'm going to add one wrinkle. I think it should be completely legal for big companies to
01:20:07.380 literally bribe. But I would want them to have to reveal it to at least our intelligence
01:20:15.660 operatives. So, you know, you could say, well, there's a chance of leaking, but I don't think
01:20:22.740 it's a big risk because it'd be legal. You know, you'd be leaking that somebody did something that's
01:20:28.380 completely legal. But I don't think we want to publicize it. I just think it needs to be revealed.
01:20:36.240 So there should be some, I'm going to call a half transparency, meaning that we guarantee that
01:20:41.820 somebody who's, you know, important in the government knows what's happening. So maybe it's
01:20:46.840 not the intelligence people. Maybe it's Congress. You know, maybe there needs to be an updated list of
01:20:52.860 all the bribes. So if you're, if you've got the right, let's say security clearance, and you just
01:20:58.740 ask for it, maybe it's in a skiff or something, you can say, oh, this company bribed this thing,
01:21:04.100 this company bribed that. Now, I think we live in a world where, and this is speculation, so I'll take a,
01:21:11.080 I'll take a better opinion on this if somebody has one. I think it was necessary for America to
01:21:16.780 strong arm other countries for the past hundred years, because it was the only way to control them.
01:21:24.840 But we might've reached the point where it just makes more sense to bribe the people we need to
01:21:28.780 bribe and not run a coup because the coups have all kinds of, you know, hidden costs. But what if
01:21:36.780 you just bribe people to get into the country and stay there and make some money? If we're at a point
01:21:42.140 where bribing makes more sense than organizing a coup, then we should get rid of this, this
01:21:48.420 prohibition about bribing. All right. So apparently, according to the Guardian, there was this US
01:22:00.320 funded social network. So meaning a fake social network of people who are attacking the critics
01:22:07.060 of pesticides, which would include RFK Jr. And so apparently they had some kind of a private website
01:22:15.180 where they would give the information of all the critics of pesticides so that you could better attack
01:22:24.120 the critics of pesticides. That's right. Pesticides are quite popular. I don't know what is
01:22:36.920 that or is not healthy about pesticides, but I can tell you that when I stopped eating all processed
01:22:44.440 foods and wheat, sure felt better. All right. So apparently that was at least part of financed
01:22:52.180 by US taxpayer dollars. Did you know that you were financing a fake network of people to go after
01:22:59.740 critics of our poison food supply? You were paying for somebody to criticize RFK Jr. and other people
01:23:10.860 like me, because I'm also a critic of the pesticides. So can I go back to my earlier point?
01:23:18.740 If you believe in 2025 that our elections are not rigged, you're a fucking idiot. Everything's
01:23:29.060 rigged. Nothing's real. Black Lives Matter, totally artificial. January 6, Charlottesville, fake news,
01:23:40.260 fake. Yeah, the elections are the only thing that are real. Sure. But at least we're smarter in 2025.
01:23:48.740 And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what I want to talk about today. I can feel the heavy equipment
01:23:55.220 outside my window. I hope you can't hear that. But I'm going to say hi to the locals people,
01:24:01.680 the subscribers. And subscribe to Dilbert if you want to see Dilbert joining the Doge project. He
01:24:08.340 joins Doge today. He'll only be doing that for this week because he has to get back to his regular life.
01:24:15.140 All right. People on X and YouTube and Rumble, thanks for joining. I hope to see you tomorrow. Same time,
01:24:21.380 same place. And locals coming at you.