Episode 2747 CWSA 02⧸11⧸25
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 24 minutes
Words per minute
144.87367
Harmful content
Misogyny
12
sentences flagged
Toxicity
35
sentences flagged
Hate speech
35
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we discuss: Dr. Dilbert's new job as an engineer for Doge, Why women like stronger men, and What the hell is the real reason why Donald Trump is so popular?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
civilization that's called coffee with scott adams and you've never had a better time but if
00:00:06.380
you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny
00:00:10.720
shiny human brains all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein
00:00:14.760
a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee
00:00:19.840
and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine at the end of the day the thing that makes
00:00:25.380
everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens right now
00:00:31.220
you are now fortified all right if you were subscribing to the dilbert comic
00:00:43.780
which never stopped some of you think it did but it didn't um dilbert is uh being recruited to work
00:00:51.760
on doge so it's uh just gonna be a one-week series you won't be there long because he always has to
00:00:57.740
return to his other life but uh dilbert is selected to work for doge i don't know if you knew this
00:01:03.560
but in the dilbert comic universe although dilbert is a put-upon cubicle employee uh i always try to
00:01:14.380
frame him as the best engineer in the world so of course he'd be asked of course he would
00:01:21.580
all right um let's look and see if there's any science that they could have skipped and maybe
00:01:28.960
save some money let's see uh eric nolan's running for a side post the stronger men have more sex
1.00
00:01:35.260
partners stronger men have more sex partners hmm i wonder how much they spent to find out that women
00:01:45.260
like stronger men because i didn't see it coming no i did see it coming next time just ask me scott
00:01:54.140
we're thinking about doing a study of to see if tall men have more sex don't need to they do well okay
00:02:02.580
well what if we studied to find out if tall rich men have more sex don't need to don't need to they
0.99
00:02:10.380
do okay but we're still curious about tall rich men who have all of their hair yes more sex every
00:02:19.660
time but what about tall rich men who go to the gym and really have a good physique again save your
00:02:27.420
money this is why you come to me first big money saver i'm like i'm like pre-doge you don't even need
00:02:37.680
doge if you just come to me first that's all you need to do i'm just full of answers um there's another
00:02:48.400
study in american psychological association i guess that's a publication uh they found out that satire
00:02:56.460
is more damaging than boring criticism hmm who could they have asked to save some money on that
00:03:06.260
study oh that's right why don't you ask the cartoonist who writes satire all the time like i'm doing
1.00
00:03:13.860
right now mocking their stupid ass study notice how my satire about their stupid ass study
1.00
00:03:19.600
is way more damning than a boring criticism well i i'm not sure that was a high priority study
1.00
00:03:27.180
no see boring as soon as i lay the satire on sing sing right to the heart just ask me next time
00:03:36.100
satire it's good stuff well cnn is uh showing their their numbers data guy harry enton uh he shows
00:03:46.480
the 70 percent of americans say trump is doing exactly what he said he would do if he got elected
00:03:51.660
especially the doge stuff he was pretty clear about that but uh in addition trump set new highs his
00:03:59.660
popularity is at a new all-time high including his entire first term and what could possibly be the
00:04:08.440
reason behind his popularity could it be that he picks the uh i'm going to use the scott jennings
00:04:17.460
frame because this is a good one that trump picks the things that 80 percent of the country likes
00:04:23.580
and of course 20 to 25 percent of the country is wrong about everything so it wouldn't matter what
00:04:29.500
it was it's like should we save the the orphans uh because the orphanage is on fire and there's still
00:04:37.540
plenty of time to get the orphans out should we save them well yeah 80 percent of the country would
00:04:44.700
say you save those orphans what are you talking about of course you would but 20 percent would say
00:04:49.520
what kind of orphans are we talking about are they republicans i don't know not so fast maybe they
00:04:56.480
deserve it now i'm just making that up but the point is 20 percent of the public is wrong about
00:05:02.000
everything so if you get it if you have a topic that 80 of the public is on the same side that's
00:05:08.700
basically everyone because the other 20 are not thinkers or serious or understanding of their
00:05:18.180
environment in any important way so you can ignore the last 20 as not even real no matter what the
00:05:25.720
question is 20 no you're not even you're not even in the right conversation people so as long as trump's
00:05:33.980
doing the things that are super popular you can mix in a few things that are you know maybe 50 50s and
00:05:40.120
a couple of 40 60s and he's going to be golden um but the other reason that he's popular is that people
00:05:47.800
love action and they love energy and they love it even more when it's coming from a dominant male
00:05:55.340
figure why because we're human we're just human if you're a guy are you not impressed by a high
00:06:04.040
energy powerful um alpha male of course you are why do we watch football we watch football because it's
00:06:12.860
just filled with these high powered high energy alpha males it's what we like do women like to uh do they
1.00
00:06:22.540
they feel good about high energy alpha males yeah yeah who doesn't 20 20 don't like that
00:06:32.560
because they don't like anything it's different 20 every time but uh the other the other thing is
00:06:39.520
besides being uh high energy and high action you know just the pace of things is just purely impressive
00:06:44.800
and the fact that we're paying them how much do you love the fact that we're paying trump well
00:06:52.220
actually we're not he i believe he's not taking a salary right i don't remember if he said it this
00:06:57.920
term but i i think it's automatic he's not taking it so we're not paying him per se except for you know
00:07:04.340
it costs a lot for secret service etc but we're getting a really good value because we're getting
00:07:11.240
we're getting elon musk for free i mean how how often does that happen for free and so if you do
00:07:22.080
that much stuff you've got that much energy you got that much action you've got that much alpha male
00:07:27.320
stuff you're working for free we're getting we're getting a bargain we love bargains especially when
00:07:34.380
they're uncovering all the bad things that we're paying for but on top of all of that i think the
00:07:40.900
media brainwashing machine is broken i think trump broke it it took a long time and we all had to
00:07:47.960
help but once you realize that the media is not trying to give you the news that's really the
00:07:54.580
secret if you think well they're trying to give you the straight news but yeah everybody makes a
00:07:59.980
mistake if you're in that model you have no idea what's going on no the news is not trying to give
00:08:07.480
you the news you know there may be some entities that are trying but mostly you know your your big
00:08:16.460
entities we know for sure they're not trying to give you the real news it's always a it's always a
00:08:23.560
narrative anyway so here's something i love i love the fact that calling out the brainwashing techniques
00:08:33.700
that the news is using you know the little propaganda tricks it's become a parlor game
00:08:38.940
now compare this to 2016 in 2016 we simply thought there were two opinions well there's the opinion on
00:08:48.260
the left and there's opinion on the right and they're different yeah we understand that that's why
00:08:54.180
there's a left and the right different opinions but over time we learned that what we were observing
00:09:00.080
wasn't just a different of a difference of opinion what we learned was the news isn't real
00:09:07.300
and once you realize the news isn't real then you can start looking for the technique and have you
00:09:14.580
noticed how delightful it is that um you know i i would say that people like mike cernovich people like
00:09:22.720
me have been pointing out technique for years but somehow collectively and other people of course
00:09:30.300
it's not just us but uh collectively the entire right-leaning part of the world has been educated on
00:09:38.200
the tricks let me give you an example so caitlin collins cnn um she said uh recently quote we are three
00:09:46.000
two weeks into the second trump presidency three weeks and tonight there are warnings that the u.s is
00:09:52.340
dangerously close to a constitutional crisis there are warnings do you know what the warnings are
00:09:58.440
well according to john podritz um who who apparently is up to speed on the propaganda tricks
00:10:08.020
he explains what the quote warnings are about the constitutional crisis so he goes uh so this is
00:10:17.900
how it works the new york times does a story in which leftist professors say there's a constitutional
00:10:23.940
crisis and six hours later cnn does a story saying there are warnings which is technically true
00:10:32.200
because there's there were warnings right there in the new york times but it's simply just an
00:10:37.300
extension of a party ideological line from one media institution through another now that's a
00:10:43.200
standard trick so that first the democrats will plant a story with a friendly reporter and then the
00:10:50.380
rest of the press will treat it like it must be important and substantial because it's in the other
00:10:56.580
press well if it's in the new york times so watching uh john podritz uh call that out was very satisfying
00:11:06.640
to me because the more you learn to spot this stuff the better off we're going to be so it's just a sign
00:11:15.340
of good health that we can call this out and laugh at it it gets better um and i would even go so far as
00:11:23.160
that we've just πraud so what john was doing was just pointing out you know how the propaganda um
00:11:29.800
architecture works but because it's on x and x you know will give you follows and reposts and you know
00:11:40.260
if you wanted to you could even monetize it so there's actually a reward so we've literally gamified
00:11:46.860
gamified the process of calling out the propaganda. And it's fun. And not only is it fun,
00:11:54.760
you might get paid for it if you've monetized your account. So related to this, I saw a story
00:12:02.720
in the Wall Street Journal that Steve Bannon's war room, and so this would include Steve Bannon
00:12:09.120
and one of his co-hosts, I don't know how many co-hosts he has, but his co-host, Natalie Winters,
00:12:14.540
they both keep MSNBC on all day. So MSNBC would be the opposite of their point of view.
00:12:23.800
And they keep it on all day. Do you know why? They don't really watch the conservative media that
00:12:32.540
much. They just keep MSNBC kind of locked on. Because it's hilarious. It's for the jokes.
00:12:40.280
It's so that you can make fun of them. Because they're so ridiculous that I keep it on all day,
0.98
00:12:48.660
too. Now, actually, I usually flip through and I spend a lot of time. I watch MSNBC for the laughs.
0.96
00:12:56.860
And that's not a joke. It's not hyperbole. Once you realize that they're not even trying to be any
00:13:02.320
kind of a news network, once you realize its only intention is propaganda, then it gets fun.
00:13:09.960
And we're going to have a little fun with them in a little bit. So yeah, I watch them for the same
00:13:14.420
reason, just to watch how the propaganda works and see what they're up to. And I do watch MSNBC more
00:13:21.240
than, probably more than I watch conservative media. I mean, I sample everything, but I'll bet I spend more
00:13:28.780
time watching MSNBC because I'm just fascinated by the technique. So Joy Reid on MSNBC, I guess she said
00:13:41.140
today, or it might have been yesterday, that the Doge employee named Big Balls, you know, that was
00:13:47.940
his name online at one point, Big Balls, must be subpoenaed. Now, why does subpoena have to have
00:13:57.060
pina in it? Because it feels like subpoena means whatever's below your pina, and what's below your
00:14:05.280
pina is your big balls. I don't know, is it just me? And then I look at Joy Reid with her short hair,
1.00
00:14:12.720
you know, her shaved head, and I think, why do you have to dress like the thing you're criticizing?
0.97
00:14:19.160
Do you remember when she had Trump hair? She had a Trump haircut when she was criticizing Trump all day?
00:14:24.600
I thought, that's weird. Why would you wear the hair of the thing you're criticizing? Now she's
0.50
00:14:31.100
spending all day criticizing Big Balls, and she's got her hair cut really short, so she looks like,
0.99
00:14:36.820
you know, Big Ball's left testicle. You know, it's just sort of a testicle with a face on it.
0.99
00:14:43.640
And I'll tell you, I call this whole thing scrotum gate, because scrotum is a word you don't get to
0.99
00:14:49.520
use enough. Any chance I get to say scrotum in public, I'm going to take it. I'm like,
0.72
00:14:55.220
can I say scrotum on this podcast? Scrotum. Yeah, it's just a funny word. So scrotum gate gets better.
0.99
00:15:03.420
So here's something I've noticed, and I want to see if you've noticed it too.
00:15:08.940
Do you notice that the people on CNN, I'm going to know just two of them in particular,
00:15:13.680
Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid, have one thing in common that is the strangest thing to have in
00:15:20.560
common. They don't blink their eyes at the same time. In other words, each of them has two eyes,
00:15:27.540
and here would be a normal person blinking, if you're watching. Blink, blink. See both eyes blink?
00:15:36.260
Pretty much a normal person when they blink, both of them blink.
00:15:39.480
But have you ever watched either Rachel Maddow or Joy Reid when they're on camera?
00:15:46.240
Their eyes blink, but one at a time, like they're fighting off something. It's like,
00:15:52.540
and then Trump, Trump is like a dictator. It's like 1939 Hitler.
00:16:01.940
Now, where does that come from? If you find somebody who blinks separately with each eye,
00:16:12.440
I wouldn't believe anything that comes out of their mouth,
00:16:16.060
because I don't even know what causes that. What causes you to reflexively blink separately
00:16:23.880
with each eye? I don't know. I'm not sure that's a tell for mental health or lying or what that is,
00:16:32.620
but I don't see it anywhere else. Have you ever seen that anywhere else? And two of their major
00:16:39.040
hosts do the same thing? What's up with that? Anyway, Ali Velshi, one of the MSNBC hosts,
00:16:48.760
who's Canadian. I didn't know he's Canadian, but he is. He's Canadian.
00:16:57.040
It feels like that comment has more power to it than I meant. If I say he's Canadian,
00:17:04.480
suddenly your brain fills up with all these stereotypes. And you're thinking, oh, he's a
00:17:10.000
crazy communist because, oh, he's like Trudeau. I hate the fact that five years ago, if you said
0.94
00:17:20.560
somebody is Canadian, you would have just automatically thought, oh, excellent. I'd like
00:17:27.640
to invite them over for coffee. I like Canadians. Canadians are the best. But after a few more
00:17:34.440
years of Trudeau, if you hear somebody is a Canadian, you're like, oh, I'm sorry. Sorry
00:17:40.240
about that. How's it feel? Are you OK? Do you need any help? Anyway, so Ali Velshi on MSNBC said
00:17:49.320
that, quote, blacks will be impacted most by Trump's gutting of the bureaucracy. Now, should
1.00
00:17:56.640
we dig into that? No, we don't give a shit. I'm not saying we don't give a shit about black
1.00
00:18:02.260
Americans. I'm saying we don't give a shit about his opinion. And is it true that people
1.00
00:18:09.160
who are at the lowest end of the economic situation will have some greater impact based
00:18:16.940
on what's happening now? Well, I would say that's always the case. If there's a war, people
00:18:24.380
at the low end of the economic ladder almost always get it worse. If there's a depression,
00:18:30.080
who gets it worse? If there's a pandemic, who gets it worse? So it is true, and we can't ignore
00:18:36.580
it, that the people at the low end of the economic ladder are going to get everything worse
00:18:42.320
whenever you make any big change. But to be fair, what Trump promised, maybe without saying it
00:18:50.980
directly, is that we're going to take some pain to cut the government down to a sustainable level
00:18:57.600
because you know what would happen if we just kept doing what we were doing and didn't cut
00:19:02.020
anything? We would be out of business. We would be broke. The country would crumble. Guess who gets
00:19:09.080
hurt the most when the entire country crumbles? The people at the low end of the economic ladder.
00:19:15.340
So it's, to me, just looking at this, it's more MSNBC searching for their old way of business.
00:19:25.060
Hey, I've got an idea. I don't know if anybody's thought of this before, but what if no matter what
00:19:31.860
Republicans do, we brand it as racist? Has anybody tried that yet? Oh, it's the only thing we've ever
00:19:39.200
tried. Well, what if we also make up some stuff? Okay. Okay. But wait, that's also what we've been
00:19:46.820
doing. But what if we have everybody agree that it's true? That's what you've been doing. Okay.
00:19:55.500
Okay. But what if we ignore the bad things that happen on the Democrat side? Okay. That's actually
00:20:02.500
what you've been doing. So I love their inability to learn. Ontario, the wait is over. The gold
00:20:10.940
standard of online casinos has arrived. Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style
00:20:16.620
excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips. Whether you're a seasoned
00:20:21.860
player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple. And in just a few clicks, you can have access
00:20:27.400
to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games. Make the most of your
00:20:32.580
downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden
00:20:37.980
opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino. Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the
00:20:43.340
tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action, all from the comfort of
00:20:48.760
your own devices. Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino?
00:20:54.740
Gambling problem? Call Connex Ontario, 1-866-531-2600. 19 and over. Physically present in Ontario.
00:21:02.660
Eligibility restrictions apply. See goldennuggetcasino.com for details. Please play responsibly.
00:21:09.040
Meanwhile, there's the story that you're just going to need somebody smarter to explain the next part to
00:21:15.400
you. So how many judges now have ruled against some little thing that Doge is doing or Trump is
00:21:22.840
doing? Is it five or six? I think there was another one today. There were five yesterday.
00:21:30.660
So, you know, the lawfare is just coming wildly. Now, Kyle Cheney was pointing out on X today that
00:21:39.780
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, she's the fifth judge just yesterday, just in one day, just yesterday,
00:21:46.740
five judges to block some aspect of what Trump is trying to get done with executive orders.
00:21:55.660
And here's what they're doing. They're kind of blocking common sense. As long as Trump stays in
00:22:04.520
that 80-20 mode where he's getting rid of the penny and people are saying, yeah, yeah, get rid of the
00:22:10.880
penny. He's bringing back plastic straws and people are like, oh yeah, plastic straws.
00:22:18.960
And he's trying to end the war in Ukraine. Oh yeah, let's end that war. He's trying to
00:22:23.300
cut the waste and fraud out of the government. Oh yeah, we can all agree on that. Let's get rid of
00:22:29.140
the waste and fraud. So as long as he stays in that 80%-ish mode, watching Democrats try to stop
00:22:37.880
him from doing things that we all want, except for the 20% who are just bad shit crazy in every topic.
0.98
00:22:45.320
It's fun. But in this context, Elon Musk just changed his own name on his profile on X to Harry
00:22:53.960
Balls. Balls spelled B-O-L-Z. Why? Why not? Why not? Harry Balls. Okay.
00:23:05.720
And then Musk and others are pointing out that Trump isn't the only one who is considered ignoring
00:23:16.600
a court order if the court order didn't seem like it was on point. So do you remember that Biden said
00:23:24.920
when the Supreme Court blocked his idea to pay off the student loans? He said directly, Biden said,
00:23:32.480
the Supreme Court tried to block me from relieving student debt, but they didn't stop me. Blah,
00:23:37.800
blah, blah. I'm going to keep going. So Biden said it directly. The Supreme Court ruled against me,
00:23:43.480
but I'm going to try to thwart their ruling by finding some clever workaround.
00:23:50.120
All right. I mean, I'm open-minded that maybe it was a workaround. I mean, if it literally doesn't go
00:23:57.740
against the Supreme Court ruling and yet defeats the, you know, let's say the intent of it,
00:24:04.340
that might be legal. So I'm no expert. I don't know. But it's sketchy and it seems inappropriate.
00:24:14.940
I mean, why would you try to get around a Supreme Court ruling? That just feels like the wrong move if
00:24:20.780
you're the leader of the country. But here's a Laura Loomer scoop. Laura Loomer is the best at
00:24:31.020
coming up with, did you know that somebody's daughter is working for somebody else? You know,
00:24:37.620
the connections, the who's involved connections. She's really good at that. So her scoop today is
00:24:43.980
that Judge John McConnell, so that's a federal judge from Rhode Island who ordered Trump and Doge to
00:24:50.700
unfreeze billions of dollars in federal grants that, you know, were things that Doge was trying to
00:24:56.980
stop. And did you know that this judge, according to Laura Loomer, as a daughter who currently works at
00:25:04.720
the U.S. Department of Education as a senior policy advisor? So the judge who doesn't want
00:25:13.160
things such as, for example, the Department of Education to be closed, has a daughter who's got a
00:25:23.180
job there. Now, I think Elon Musk mentioned that it might be a fake job. Does this sound like a real
00:25:30.480
job being a senior policy advisor at the U.S. Department of Education? Not really. It doesn't
00:25:38.840
really sound like a real job to me, because don't you think you could get pretty good advice just by
00:25:44.780
asking around? Like, why would you even pay for that? How much is the daughter getting paid to give
1.00
00:25:51.820
advice to an entity that's never made a difference in anybody's lives, at least in terms of the test scores
00:25:59.500
hasn't approved the test scores? So kind of good to know, the network of connections. I love the fact
00:26:07.660
that everything that's going on now with Doge is revealing the networks. So now you can see who's
00:26:14.240
connected. You can see all the bad actors, because they all have to come out, because they're the only
00:26:19.600
ones that are going to fight to protect the corruption. Like, who else is going to argue in
00:26:24.300
public? In public? Who else is going to argue in public to keep the corruption? Only the
00:26:30.940
benefactors. Like, nobody else is going to make that argument. That would be crazy, unless they're
00:26:35.820
blackmailers. So here's some more cuts made by Doge. Apparently, there was something called the
0.59
00:26:44.200
Norwegian Refugee Council. There's a Norwegian Refugee Council. And they've announced that they're
00:26:55.580
suspending their activities in almost 20 countries. The Norwegian Refugee Council was working in 20
00:27:01.820
countries due to the USAID freeze imposed by Trump. So USAID was paying the Norwegian Refugee Council
00:27:14.020
to operate in 20 countries. These sound like jokes, don't they? Doesn't it sound like I just made
00:27:22.400
that up? The Norwegian Refugee Council had to close down? Well, it gets worse. You know, now that the
00:27:31.080
Norwegian Refugee Council is closed, I feel like Doge is going to go after next, maybe the Swedish
1.00
00:27:37.500
Dingleberry Freedom Council. Because if the Swedish Dingleberry Freedom Council doesn't get their USAID
00:27:46.240
funding, how can they continue to bring their Dingleberry message to all the other countries?
00:27:52.840
Can you tell which one I made up? Which one's not real? The Norwegian Refugee Council or the Swedish
0.60
00:28:00.460
Dingleberry Freedom Council? Which one did I just make up? It's called satire, folks. Satire. And if you
00:28:08.080
were here at the beginning, you know that satire is far more damaging than regular boring criticisms that
00:28:14.860
you'll see on other podcasts. No. Satire. Boom. Bringing it home. Well, the JFK files may be fun.
00:28:27.620
Apparently, there were 2,400 undisclosed records that have now been disclosed. At least disclosed
00:28:35.900
that they exist. They're not disclosed in terms of their contents. But we expect that it might be
00:28:40.720
coming. So, anybody want to place any bets on what we learned about the JFK assassination? I'm going to
00:28:49.680
put my money on nothing. Nothing. We're not going to learn anything. Do you believe that the
00:28:56.760
government of the United States may have been involved in assassinating a president and they
00:29:03.640
left a memo about it? It was a memo? Oh, let's find the recordings where they were planning it.
00:29:12.600
No. They couldn't. This is just a prediction. Now, I could be wrong, which would be really fun.
00:29:20.940
I would love to be wrong. I'd love to be wrong about this and about UFOs, but I don't think there's
00:29:29.300
any chance we're going to learn some shocking new thing about who killed Kennedy. We might learn some
00:29:35.240
shocking new things about how the government operates, but I don't know if we're going to find
00:29:40.340
out from the files who killed them. And if we did, would you trust it? Suppose deep down in the files,
00:29:48.460
somewhere it said, oh, we found out that it was Russia all along. Would you believe that? I wouldn't.
00:29:56.600
If it said, you know, we didn't want to tell the country, but it was really China. China was behind
0.66
00:30:02.880
it. Would you believe that? I wouldn't. Suppose they said it was Israel. Israel was behind it.
0.93
00:30:12.420
Well, that would be convenient because people would be, you know, sort of primed to believe that
00:30:18.860
because that's one of the conspiracy theories here the most. But would you believe it? I might say to
00:30:25.840
myself, well, that's convenient. Kind of convenient to blame it on another country. If you happen to be
00:30:31.400
the ones that did it, wouldn't it be nice to have some other country to blame? So even if it were
00:30:36.440
true, I wouldn't believe it because I saw it in a memo that's been buried for 60 years or whatever.
00:30:43.840
So how could we possibly learn anything that would be both believable and new? I'm going to say
00:30:53.340
nothing. I think nothing's coming. I really do. Just nothing. But it'll be fun.
00:30:59.420
Meanwhile, there's a report that Trump may have dispatched his special envoy, Steve Whitkoff,
00:31:08.080
to Moscow. That's based on looking at some jet action. I guess there's a jet that he is known to
00:31:18.460
be sometimes on and maybe he's on it and it's heading to Moscow. So we'll wait for that. I would
00:31:25.800
expect that Trump and Putin, maybe through intermediaries, maybe not, probably are well
00:31:34.500
along on negotiating. I'll bet they're halfway there at least. And I think both of them want
00:31:42.800
to find a solution. But we'll talk more about Ukraine in a minute.
00:31:49.800
Bank more encores when you switch to a Scotiabank banking package.
00:31:54.420
Learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages. Conditions apply. Scotiabank,
00:32:00.260
you're richer than you think. Meanwhile, apparently the Trump Department of Justice
00:32:07.980
is dropping the charges. We're recommending dropping them, which looks like it's going to work.
00:32:14.980
Dropping charges against Eric Adams, Mayor Adams of New York. No relation.
00:32:19.600
So he was accused of taking illegal campaign contributions from Turkey and accepting $100,000
00:32:27.840
in travel and hotel perks in exchange for official acts. Now, the things we know are that Turkey asked
00:32:35.040
them when their building would be ready. And he asked the fire department, when's that building
00:32:41.320
going to be ready? Now, is that more than he would have done for any other constituent? I hope not.
00:32:50.340
That should be exactly what he would do for every constituent. If somebody has a big, expensive
00:32:56.120
building and they can't move into it in New York City and there's a bureaucratic delay,
00:33:02.760
is that not appropriate to talk to the mayor's office and say, hey, mayor's office, is there somebody
00:33:08.180
you could talk to to get this going? Because we'd like to bring a whole bunch of people in. They're
00:33:12.260
going to eat lunch. They're going to spend money in your city. Of course he should make that phone call.
00:33:17.700
Of course he should. And then later when he's traveling, the accusation is he got some of his
00:33:27.760
travel upgraded. Maybe a better hotel room, maybe a better seat on the plane. Is that a crime?
00:33:39.420
Well, what do you think happens to public dignitaries no matter when they travel?
00:33:46.300
Do you think that somebody like Mayor Adams wouldn't get automatic upgrades no matter what
00:33:51.440
he was doing? And the fact that it happens in the context of somebody being happy with him doing his
00:33:57.220
job as the mayor, exactly the job a mayor should do, make sure the bureaucracy is not stopping the
00:34:02.560
economy. This is pretty weak stuff. It looks like lawfare. And it happened very quickly after Mayor
00:34:11.240
Adams became a critic of Biden's immigration policy. Because he would be a really powerful voice
00:34:18.980
because he's a, you know, he's a Democrat running the biggest city that's the most impacted, it seemed
00:34:24.860
like. And he was dangerous, dangerous to the Biden administration because he was being honest about
00:34:32.720
a real problem. So in, uh, in, I guess, dropping the charges, I think it's official by now that they've
00:34:41.940
dropped him. Um, the Trump administration would be signaling that he was a victim of lawfare.
00:34:49.540
And in their, in their communication, they basically say that it's a little too sketchy
00:34:55.020
that these weak charges came right after he became a critic of immigration. It's a little too
00:35:01.300
coincidental. Now, uh, apparently he could still be charged in the future, but at the moment it looks
00:35:09.760
like he'll at least have freedom to run for reelection if that's what he wants to do. Now, how smart is it
00:35:15.720
for, I mean, I assume that Trump was sort of behind it, you know, even if he didn't say it directly,
00:35:22.680
you know, maybe the department of justice would be able to read the room and do it,
00:35:26.940
but how smart is it from Trump's perspective that this is happening? It's perfect because Trump has
00:35:33.820
made the point that the charges against him were lawfare. What could make that point better
00:35:40.900
than letting a prominent Democrat, a prominent Democrat, uh, escape, help him escape from his
00:35:51.900
lawfare problems too. And both of them being anti-immigration, the way it's being done,
00:35:58.240
or it wasn't being done. It looks like the same play. It looks like lawfare was used against them
00:36:05.360
because immigration was more important to the administration, but it gets better because he
00:36:11.480
also, uh, signed a unconditional pardon for former Illinois governor, uh, Rod Blagovich. Now I don't
00:36:20.180
know too much about the Blagovich story. Some people say he was set up some people, you know, obviously
00:36:26.480
there are going to be two sides to the story, but it also reinforces the idea that lawfare is being
00:36:34.580
used against prominent politicians. So now Trump has created a three point argument. Look what they
00:36:41.880
did to me, look what they did to somebody on their own team, just for disagreeing on one, on just one
00:36:47.780
topic, just one topic, immigration, that's it. And then look what they did in the past to, uh, Blagovich.
00:36:56.580
That really, that really solidifies that lawfare argument when you can show three points
00:37:02.920
and then, and then in the context of it, we're watching all these, um, in my opinion, corrupt
00:37:09.900
judges. They act like they're corrupt. I don't have proof of that. They just act as corrupt people
00:37:16.540
in, in the, if you're just looking at the outcome of what they're doing, you got to just shake your
00:37:22.640
head and say, that doesn't look, that doesn't look appropriate. You don't have to be any kind of
00:37:28.040
lawyer to know that what the judges are doing looks like a form of lawfare, right? So not only
00:37:34.580
is he made his lawfare argument about things that have happened in the past, but it's right in the
00:37:40.880
middle of a whole lawfare campaign against them in office. It's very, very clever that they're making
00:37:49.920
a big deal about these two cases of lawfare. Very well done. I'll tell you, uh, no matter how many
00:37:56.980
times I say this, it's worth saying again, the Trump administration has really good advisors,
00:38:05.520
but I like to tell you in every case, the boss gets all the credit because the boss has to pick
00:38:11.900
the advisors and then the boss has to decide which advice to follow, which is, I would argue the hard
00:38:17.860
part. So Trump gets all the credit, but I would be remiss if I didn't say, my God, he's getting good
00:38:27.000
advice. Um, Musk said today on X that, uh, I'm paraphrasing, but he basically said all the smart people
00:38:36.220
are, you know, are joining the Trump side of things. And I think that's true. I believe everybody's
00:38:43.000
smart is now drifting to his side, everybody's smart. And if you see somebody who has a high IQ,
00:38:52.140
but they're not, they're still resisting. They're either getting paid, you know, it's just part of
00:38:57.760
their work. And I can name lots of people who are clearly getting paid for their resistance
00:39:02.060
or they have TDS and it's literally a mental problem. But of the people who don't have a mental
00:39:09.100
problem and don't have an economic stake in being a critic, they pretty much all the smart ones have
00:39:16.900
come to the same side. You want a good example of that? Sam Altman says that Biden, just, just
00:39:26.140
recently, Sam Altman just said that the Biden administration was sort of anti-business and he
00:39:31.760
was happy to see him go. And that the Trump administration is like a breath of fresh air for
00:39:37.620
business and that everybody in the Valley feels it. Sam Altman, no matter what else, what other
00:39:44.940
problems you have about him, and we'll talk a little more about that, but whatever else you want to
00:39:49.280
say, everybody agrees he's smart and he doesn't seem to be crazy. Right. And nobody's paying him to
00:39:55.720
be a Biden supporter. Everybody smart is on the same side unless they have mental illness or they're
0.89
00:40:03.500
being paid. We really are at that point where I don't think there's an exception. The reflexive
00:40:11.600
people like Larry Summers and like that, I don't take them seriously because they're sort of deeply in
00:40:17.520
the game, but the people who are not in the game, all the smart ones are on the same side. If you can find
00:40:24.160
an exception, let me know. I don't know of any. There are people who are quiet, but that's
00:40:32.500
different. Anyway, as Trump just pointed out, California just finished counting the votes for
00:40:38.660
2024. What? That's right. Remember the 2024 election? It seems like it was years ago because
00:40:49.500
we're moving at Trump's speed at the moment. California just finished counting. Now they had
00:40:59.160
declared the winners before because I guess they were sure it wouldn't change the result,
00:41:04.000
but they were still counting. What? All right. So let me show a contrast between what made sense in
00:41:14.340
2020 and what makes sense today. Do you remember 2020? It was so long ago. In 2020, if you questioned
00:41:22.300
an American election result, you would be considered to be an election denier and possibly an insurrectionist.
0.59
00:41:31.840
So you might've been a Russian stooge or some kind of a traitor, but at the very least,
0.86
00:41:40.120
you're an election denier election deniers. My God, just, just even having that opinion that our
0.89
00:41:49.620
immaculate election systems could be in any way compromised. What kind of a fool, what kind of a
0.99
00:41:57.500
insurrectionist, dangerous Russian puppet fool are you? That's 2020. You want to fast forward to 2025
1.00
00:42:06.360
2025 with me? 2025. Here's what that argument looks like today. So after learning, as we have all
00:42:19.340
learned, because we're following Doge, et cetera. So after learning that nearly every government agency
00:42:25.080
is corrupt, is that fair? Am I going too far so far that we've learned that nearly, and maybe it's
00:42:33.980
everyone, but we can say for sure, nearly every government organization is corrupt. And fundamentally,
00:42:41.080
not just a little bit, fundamentally. I mean, FEMA's sending money for the immigration and then lying
00:42:49.580
about it. Apparently the people involved in that are getting fired today. Thank you. So once you've
00:42:55.140
learned that every major agency in the government from, you know, Congress, and then also outside the
00:43:04.400
government, you got your health cares, God knows what. By the way, did you see the study? There was a
00:43:12.820
study of 52 of the most landmark studies in cancer. Landmark studies, meaning that everybody would look at
00:43:21.760
these group of 52 studies and say, these are the ones that are, you know, credible and they will
00:43:28.420
inform how we treat cancer. 52 of them. So somebody tried to reproduce them. How many of the 52 landmark
00:43:38.080
healthcare studies do you think were reproducible? 11%. 89% were not real in the sense that they couldn't be
00:43:48.900
reproduced. 89%. That was driving our cancer decisions for years, if not decades. It might have
00:44:00.180
been decades. Now that's healthcare. Healthcare is something you would expect would be the most
00:44:07.380
free from that kind of effect. But in fact, it's completely marinating in it. What about our,
00:44:15.340
you know, what about finance? What, you know, I could go on and on, right? Everything looks corrupt.
00:44:21.920
So in 2025, after learning that nearly every agent, government agency, and really every big entity
00:44:28.460
everywhere is mostly corrupt, believing that our elections are the one fair thing in that environment
1.00
00:44:35.560
makes you a fucking idiot. So let me say it again. If you think our elections are not rigged,
1.00
00:44:41.340
you're a fucking idiot. In 2020, maybe it was a jump ball. You know, maybe you had an argument,
1.00
00:44:50.600
but the argument against it was seemingly winning in the public domain. But let me say it again.
00:44:55.980
If you still think that everything in the country is corrupt, except our election systems,
1.00
00:45:03.220
you're a fucking idiot. Now, that doesn't mean it is corrupt. It just means if you believe it like
1.00
00:45:13.580
it's a fact, you're a fucking idiot. Now, do I have proof that it's corrupt? Of course not.
1.00
00:45:22.100
That's not how anything works. Do you know I didn't have proof that USAID was corrupt until
00:45:27.200
five minutes ago? I didn't have proof that FEMA was giving American money to immigrants until five
00:45:37.600
minutes ago, right? So if today, knowing that, in fact, yesterday, yesterday, I didn't know that 89%
00:45:48.020
of cancer studies were fake. Yesterday. I didn't know that yesterday. Well, that's a lie. I didn't know
00:45:54.920
that. Actually, I did know that. But I knew that you didn't know it. I've done a deeper dive than
00:46:01.620
I've talked about so far. Yeah, I knew that they were fake, or most of them. I already knew that. But
00:46:07.880
most people didn't. So today, in this context, when you're watching your president be law-fared by
00:46:16.260
corrupt judges, do you remember when you thought, well, at least the judges, you know, in this country,
00:46:22.160
our judges are usually pretty fair? No, they're not. No, the judges are so corrupt that they're
00:46:28.860
literally shutting down the country over politics and trying to make it look like there's a law. No,
0.80
00:46:34.360
everything is corrupt. The judges, the healthcare, the finance, the government, the Congress,
00:46:41.520
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, USAID, blah, blah, blah, blah, agencies, blah, blah, blah, the Treasury.
00:46:46.400
The Treasury wasn't even looking at the things they were spending money on. The Social Security
00:46:53.840
system didn't check multiple entries using the same Social Security number, the most basic thing you
00:47:00.340
would check if you were trying to check. Our systems are designed so you can be corrupt.
00:47:08.280
They're designed to be corrupt. And it's obvious from the design. Nobody would build an election system
00:47:14.200
like ours from scratch if what they were trying to do is have a credible, accurate system.
00:47:21.260
Nobody would build this one. Not even close. So yeah, if you think that there's no chance that our
00:47:29.000
elections are rigged, you're a fucking idiot. You're just a fucking idiot. There's just no way around
1.00
00:47:35.480
that at this point. Don't get me started on climate models. All right. So if our elections
00:47:43.160
are rigged, somebody who is an NPC is going to say, Scott, Scott, if you say the elections are rigged,
00:47:49.240
watch me use satire here. Satire coming in hard. Oh, Scott. Oh, if you say the elections are rigged,
00:47:57.960
how do you explain that Trump won in 2016? And then how do you explain that he won again in 2024?
00:48:04.260
Scott, explain that. Explain that. Okay. Too big to rig. In 2016, the polls said he was definitely
00:48:13.040
going to lose. No rigging necessary. Surprise. The shy Trump supporters pulled it over the finish line.
00:48:21.540
In 2024, it literally was too big to rig. It was just too big. And we were watching too closely.
00:48:29.680
We knew exactly where to watch. The observers were everywhere. That might've been the closest
00:48:35.960
thing to an accurate election we've had. But of course, I assume there was a little bit of rigging
00:48:42.680
going on. So yes, you can win if you overwhelm the system. So the way Trump overwhelmed the system
00:48:50.180
with votes is the way he's overwhelming the fake media with so many stories that the media can't
00:48:57.120
keep up. So overwhelming is a strategy and it works against corruption because corruption is a little
00:49:04.980
slow and he can just overwhelm the corruption. Claudia was leaving for her pickleball tournament.
0.92
00:49:11.060
I've been visualizing my match all week. She was so focused on visualizing that she didn't see the
00:49:16.300
column behind her car on her backhand side. Good thing Claudia's with Intact, the insurer with the
1.00
00:49:22.460
largest network of auto service centers in the country. Everything was taken care of under one
00:49:26.900
roof and she was on her way in a rental car in no time. I made it to my tournament and lost in the
0.99
00:49:32.340
first round. But you got there on time. Intact Insurance, your auto service ace. Certain conditions apply.
00:49:38.560
All right. In other news, just because Elon Musk apparently isn't busy enough, he's making a bid for
00:49:49.120
open AI. So he put together some investors and together they're making a bid to buy open AI for
00:49:57.140
97.4 billion. Now, this gets a little complicated. You might know that open AI was originally funded
00:50:05.300
by Musk and even named it open AI because his intention was to make it a publicly available
00:50:13.260
open source kind of AI to benefit the world. At some point, Sam Altman and whoever else was aboard
00:50:23.280
decided to turn it into a for-profit and team up with Microsoft and et cetera. But they have not
00:50:34.200
completed the transition from the non-profit to the profit model. And apparently that is being valued
00:50:44.900
at around $40 billion or something. So while they're trying to work out the complexity and getting
00:50:53.420
everybody happy with the fact that they could change from a non-profit to a profit, which again
00:50:58.120
is a little technical and it's hard for me to explain the ins and outs of that. But during
00:51:04.040
that period where they're trying to make that decision, in comes a bid that would value at
00:51:10.400
that way more than $40 billion, like almost, well, more than double. So more than double.
00:51:17.360
Now, if you're on the board of directors of open AI and you've got one offer for $40 billion,
00:51:24.700
and it's that Microsoft Sam Altman idea, and then suddenly there's another one that comes in
00:51:29.940
for more than twice as much. Does the board have an obligation? Well, they do have an obligation to
00:51:37.600
stop what they're doing and consider it. So considering it, I think, is built into being
00:51:44.240
on the board. I don't think they have a chance. I don't think they have a choice of not at least
00:51:49.020
voting on it and internally considering it, because that's what a board's supposed to do.
00:51:53.640
So now, either Altman's deal will have the problem of trying to decide, why doesn't Microsoft have to
00:52:03.620
pay $97 billion? Why would their investors, I don't know if it's all from Microsoft, but why would
00:52:10.240
the investors in one way be paying $40 billion when there's somebody else who's going to pay more than
00:52:17.220
twice that? So it complicates things, and it's not clear what the entire goal is, because Musk has
00:52:25.220
already created a whole competing AI that has the best data centers, at least, which gives you
00:52:31.500
some thought that it might be the best AI at one point. So why would he do this? Well, some of it
00:52:39.520
might be personal. I don't know. But he's got other investors involved, which suggests that it at least
00:52:45.880
makes sense from a business perspective. Otherwise, the others wouldn't be involved, I think.
00:52:52.180
So this got really interesting. Now, some of it looks personal, because the way Altman and Musk
00:52:59.100
talk about each other is clearly personal. And Musk calls Altman a liar, and Altman says that Musk
00:53:07.960
must have some, I don't know, some problems from his childhood he's trying to work through.
00:53:14.200
So they both have this unflattering view of the other. And it makes me wonder how much
00:53:19.360
is personal. But at the very least, it's going to slow down open AI. So Musk is a competitor
00:53:27.220
with his own AI, and he's just threw this big turd in the punch bowl. So now they've got to figure
00:53:33.200
out what to do with the punch bowl, which should slow them down a little bit. And maybe that's the
00:53:40.520
second way to win. Maybe one way to win is to buy it. And the second way to win is to slow it down.
00:53:49.100
And along with slowing it down, it might make it too expensive for their investors to get involved
00:53:55.580
and might cause a whole fight over there. So it could be that he's just causing some trouble
00:54:01.000
for a competitor. But I would think that he wouldn't do that alone. Meaning that it probably
00:54:08.120
makes sense from a business perspective that if they said yes and sold it, he could probably make
00:54:13.840
something of that pretty quickly. All right. Maybe $97 billion is worth it just to get their
00:54:20.660
technical staff. You know, you remember Silicon Valley used to buy companies and then get rid of
00:54:27.300
the product of the company and just keep the engineers because it was the cheapest way to
00:54:31.020
buy engineers that were the best engineers. So maybe the cheapest way to buy the best AI people
00:54:37.240
is that you just overpay for the entire company and then you get the engineers. I don't know.
00:54:45.920
Except I don't know if the engineers are working for the nonprofits. I'm not exactly sure how the
00:54:52.740
structure is right now. So I can't get too much deeper. Anyway, thing I love about Doge, as I
00:54:59.820
mentioned, is it reveals the whole network of the most corrupt people in the government. So here are
00:55:06.580
the names that are fighting the hardest to stop the reduction of waste. Can you imagine being forced
00:55:17.120
to be on the team that's favoring corruption and waste? Because that's, I think the entire public
00:55:24.660
understands that Doge is getting rid of waste and corruption. Now, the other team might have a whole
00:55:33.580
different narrative of, oh, Musk is really trying to get power for himself and he's really trying to make
00:55:42.320
profits. So he's attacking the people who would be a problem for him and the government, blah, blah,
00:55:47.160
blah. But I think most Americans see Doge coming out every day and saying, look, we just saved you
00:55:54.900
another 10 billion. Well, just saved you another 100 billion. Whoops. Do you really want to be funding
00:56:00.000
the Swedish dingleberry team? No, we don't. Well, saved you another billion. So it seems like that's
00:56:07.020
such a strong story and everybody is just normally, we're all against corruption. There's no pro-corruption
00:56:15.340
except the ones who are benefiting from it. So when you see these characters, you know that they're
00:56:22.040
the worst of the worst, the ones who are on the pro-corruption side of things. So here's the people
00:56:28.320
we see the most. Schumer, Adam Schiff, duh. Elizabeth Warren, duh. Jamie Raskin.
00:56:40.480
Now, Goldman and Maxine Waters join, of course. Now, that's really a good indication.
00:56:50.640
If I told you that these same people were on the same side of any topic, what would you say?
00:56:56.160
Why? Why would Schumer, Schiff, Warren, Raskin and Goldman and Waters be on the same side?
00:57:05.520
Only when it's corrupt. You wouldn't be able to bring together this group of people except for
00:57:13.360
corruption to protect it. So this would be a group that would favor, that would argue in favor of,
00:57:19.920
let's say, the 51 intel people and the laptop. This would be the same group that would tell you
00:57:25.760
that Russia collusion was real. It's the same group that tells you that January 6th was an
00:57:31.000
insurrection. It's always the same group. So once you realize that when this group of,
00:57:39.720
to me, it looks like they're obviously corrupt, but you can draw your own conclusions. But when you
00:57:45.420
see this cast, the characters, they're not really trying to be useful and helpful and honest.
00:57:54.420
They don't do that. These are the designated liars. The people who, the worst people who will tell any
0.81
00:58:02.340
lie and they'll tell it in public. Even if they get debunked, they'll just keep telling it. So they're
00:58:08.020
the most shameless people. And when you see them, you can know that whatever they're pushing is BS.
0.92
00:58:15.900
Well, Trump has warned Hamas that the releasing of the prisoners, which had been already agreed,
00:58:22.460
not all of them, but some subset, it looked like Hamas was dragging their feet and they were asking
00:58:29.200
for some more demands or they're complaining about Israel in some way. So that's being slowed down.
00:58:35.900
Trump has warned that unless Hamas frees all the hostages held in Gaza by Saturday,
00:58:43.120
and when he says all the hostages, I think he means not just the ones that we agreed to release.
00:58:48.920
I think he means all the hostages. He says, unless they're all freed by Saturday,
00:58:55.240
that, quote, as far as I'm concerned, if all the hostages aren't returned by Saturday at 12 o'clock,
00:59:04.020
I think it's an appropriate time. You know, he just sort of randomly picks it. I would say,
00:59:08.940
cancel it, cancel the deal that they have, and all bets are off and let hell break out.
0.51
00:59:18.020
Now, this is what I love the most about Trump. When he threatens somebody, he's not bluffing.
00:59:29.100
So they have to deal with the fact that it's not a bluff, but he also didn't say exactly what he
00:59:34.740
would do. And I would argue that what he's doing is making it easy for Israel and the United States
00:59:42.900
to never repopulate Gaza. So by not accepting this, you know, weak, trickling little agreement
0.73
00:59:51.860
and just putting the onus back on him completely. It's like, all right, either release them all or
00:59:58.140
all bets are off. All bets are off means you're never going back to Gaza. Now, that's what I think
0.98
01:00:03.980
they want anyway. I think that's what Israel and probably Trump want is that the, you know, the Hamas
0.99
01:00:10.140
part of the Gazans, which you can't really separate from the rest of the Gazans, at least not effectively,
01:00:17.920
it'd be hard to know. They're just not going back. So I think the idea that, that they will ever
01:00:24.280
resettle Gaza is kind of settled. And if Saturday, by Saturday at 12 o'clock, all the hostages are not
01:00:32.640
back, that's the end of any chance that Gaza will be resettled by the original, at least the recent
0.89
01:00:41.420
residents. I think this is his yes, no switch. I think the yes, no switch is, do you want to have
01:00:50.540
any chance, just any chance of going back to Gaza? You have to until Saturday at 12 to decide. If we
01:00:57.620
don't have, if we don't have all the hostages back, that's dead forever. It will never be an option.
01:01:04.280
Forever it will be done. Now, Trump has already said that they're not going back. But the way he
01:01:11.760
says it is, we're, you know, it takes so long to clean it up. You don't want them to wait 10 years
01:01:16.920
to go back. Rather, they should have nice homes, a nice place to live more immediately. And so he's
01:01:23.680
saying if they're already in better homes 10 years from now, why would they leave? Because they'll be in
01:01:29.460
a better place. And they might be there in a year, as opposed to 10 years. So that's a good argument
01:01:35.060
where, you know, it's a carrot and a stick. So the carrot is, hey, how about we put you in nice places
01:01:40.940
fairly quickly? The stick is, if we don't get all the hostages back by noon, you get nothing.
01:01:48.600
And maybe that includes not building nice houses now. So here's what
01:02:02.380
When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from Winners, I started wondering,
01:02:08.260
is every fabulous item I see from Winners? Like that woman over there with the designer jeans.
1.00
01:02:14.020
Are those from Winners? Ooh, or those beautiful gold earrings? Did she pay full price? Or that leather
01:02:19.820
tote? Or that cashmere sweater? Or those knee-high boots? That dress? That jacket? Those shoes?
01:02:25.160
Is anyone paying full price for anything? Stop wondering. Start winning. Winners. Find fabulous
01:02:31.940
for less. I think the only way that the Gaza resident situation can be solved is if it gets
1.00
01:02:41.560
reframed as a mental health problem. If you took a whole bunch of people and you put them in Gaza and
0.58
01:02:48.480
you brainwashed them for years that they're victims and they've got to go kill other people to make up
0.92
01:02:56.920
for it, would you not be giving them PTSD and mental health problems? So even if they were born with
01:03:03.740
normal brains, if you just put them in one area and propagandize them and threaten them and you make
0.95
01:03:10.980
them live in this bad situation and you just carpet bomb them with ideas about, it's the Jews, it's the
0.98
01:03:18.620
Jews, Israel's the problem, would they not have mental health PTSD, like genuine mental health problems,
1.00
01:03:26.380
like actual health problems? I say yes. But we're not allowed to say that because that would be
1.00
01:03:32.760
sort of insulting and dismissive of thousands of years of Palestinian history. But it's also true.
1.00
01:03:42.240
It's a mental health problem. And you can't solve a mental health problem with a house,
0.75
01:03:47.400
which is what we're trying to do. How about we give you a house? I have PTSD. But what about a nice
01:03:55.980
house? Still have PTSD. I still have mental health problems. But what if it's a nice house in another
01:04:03.440
country? No. How about a nice house sooner than it could have happened? No. No, the house is not the
01:04:12.020
problem. Your house is not going to fix my brain. My brain is full of hate and PTSD. And it was PTSD
01:04:21.000
before Gaza was attacked. Before October 7th, it was PTSD. Imagine what it is now. So here's the way.
01:04:29.660
I think you have to take a page from, I hate to say it, China. They treat the Uyghurs like they're a
1.00
01:04:37.560
virus. I don't like that part because I don't like treating people like they're just carriers of a virus.
01:04:44.100
But it is the only thing that China thinks they can do, because if they let Islam grow within China,
1.00
01:04:51.760
it's not a compatible system. So I'm not defending it, because I'd love the Uyghurs to have a good
0.85
01:04:58.540
life. I'm just describing it. So China has this, you could say, evil and cruel approach to it. But
0.97
01:05:07.440
they don't have a better idea. That's the problem. What's the better idea? Just let them spread Islam
1.00
01:05:15.900
and have a problem down the road? That's not a good idea. So what could you do to reframe it as a
01:05:23.400
mental health problem? Well, you could start by saying, we'd love to resettle some Palestinians
1.00
01:05:31.420
back in Gaza once it's rebuilt. But it's going to take 10 years. And during that 10 years,
01:05:38.780
if anybody wants free mental health counseling, we'll provide it. And if in the course of that
01:05:46.200
mental health counseling, we determine that we've cured you, and you can see the full picture now,
01:05:53.160
you can see that sometimes Israel did some things you don't like, and maybe they really did.
0.82
01:05:58.040
And maybe everything's broken. And maybe it's not your fault. And maybe you don't need to go fix it.
01:06:09.160
Maybe you're a victim of the brainwashing, etc. So the question would be, if you had hypnotists and
01:06:17.020
therapists, and you said, here's the doorway to resettle where you wanted to live. You've got to
01:06:24.060
get through the therapists and the mental health professionals, and they have to certify that
01:06:30.380
you're mentally healthy enough to live among a diverse group of people. If you can't live in a
1.00
01:06:37.460
diverse group of people, and it's because your just brain won't let you, you're not ready. So you're
01:06:44.580
going to have to stay with all the other people who have the same problem because you're dangerous
01:06:48.020
on the outside. The reason we have mental institutions is because some, well, or we used
01:06:54.000
to, is because some people are just too dangerous to be on the street. Now, do we say that those
01:06:59.620
people are the bad guys? Not really. I mean, if you're fair about it, somebody who has extreme
01:07:06.260
mental illness, if they're acting in a way you don't like, it's hard for me to say it's their fault,
01:07:12.300
except that the legal system has to hold them responsible to some degree. But if we treat
01:07:20.620
the refugees from Gaza as people who have been mentally damaged by their keepers, by Hamas,
01:07:31.860
then you can treat them with compassion, and you can give them a pathway to join the diverse real
01:07:38.960
world. But you also have now a perfectly good system for preventing the worst of them from ever
01:07:46.380
leaving whatever area that they're contained in. And that might be the only way to solve it.
01:07:52.820
Is it fair? And does it show empathy for real human beings? It does if you treat it like a mental
01:08:00.720
problem. It does. Now, the trick would be that you don't want to like convert them to another religion.
0.55
01:08:08.960
A little too far. But you might have to put some dents in what they believe about their current
01:08:15.440
extreme version of their religion. And you might need to bring in, you know, trained persuaders who
01:08:21.740
are Islamic, you know, ones who don't want war with anybody, and have made it work to make peace.
01:08:27.880
And let the Islamic hypnotists and the Islamic therapists, if there are any, I assume there are,
1.00
01:08:35.720
let them do the work. And let them try to save the people that they can save. But as long as you
01:08:43.520
treat it as a military problem or a security problem, nobody's going home, and nobody's going to be happy,
01:08:49.440
and there's no path. But if you treat it as a mental problem, maybe, maybe some of them can be saved.
01:08:57.660
All right. According to Tucker Carlson on his podcast, he says that he knows for sure, and he's not
01:09:08.700
guessing, that this is a fact, that Ukraine's military is selling up to half of US arms to cartels and other
01:09:17.520
bad players. Half. Half. Does that sound real? Tucker says, and he wants us, he wants to be really clear.
01:09:30.800
He's not speculating. He says he knows it. Like he's talked to the people involved. Yeah, I know it.
01:09:38.820
Well, his contacts were a lot better than mine. So if he says that, I don't think he's lying.
01:09:43.000
Now, obviously, anybody could be wrong. But it doesn't sound like he's lying. It sounds like
01:09:49.600
he has some source that he trusts. Doesn't mean you should trust it. But he has a source he trusts
01:09:55.580
that told them maybe more than one. So yeah, that's bad. I'm trying to remember the name of the
01:10:05.860
individual. Can you put it in the comments? I didn't know how to look him up just before I got on.
01:10:10.740
There's a ex-CIA person who has a book out, and he's been on a lot of podcasts. He's all over social
01:10:20.500
media. And he's kind of outing some of the practices of the CIA. Can you put his name in
01:10:28.720
the comments? Because some of you know who he is. So he's got glasses. He's been on a whole bunch of
01:10:35.640
shows. I think he's been on Sean Ryan's show, and he's been on Tucker's show, and a bunch of others.
01:10:41.500
So give me that name. All right. I thought I'd see it by now. If I see it go by, I'll say his name.
01:10:48.380
No, it's not Bucks. No, it's not Mike Benz. No, it's not one of our regular players. It's somebody
01:10:56.600
who's new. So it, no. Really? Are you not watching the same? It's not Bustamente, but that was a good
01:11:08.200
guess, because he's also ex-CIA. Really? How do you not know the name of this guy?
01:11:17.940
Okay. He's all over social media. Not one of you knows the name? Huh. Yeah. All the names you're
01:11:27.920
telling me are names that we all know, right? If it's a name that we all know, it's the wrong name.
01:11:34.280
We know Scott Ritter. We know Mike Benz. It's not him. It's not Ian Carroll. How did none of it?
01:11:42.720
Is it Elizondo? I'm blown away. Huh. Weird. Okay. Well, anyway, if I find that, I'll tweet it or
01:11:59.940
something. But he had a story about going to Afghanistan when he was in the CIA, and he
01:12:06.760
went to an area that used to be, probably used to be a food creation place, but it was all
01:12:11.540
poppy fields. And boy, we don't follow directions too well. I say it's not a name that's one of the
01:12:25.520
common ones, and the suggestion is Dan Bongino. No, it's not Dan Bongino. Stop guessing. Stop it.
01:12:35.760
Stop it. Anyway, so whoever it is, I apologize for not writing down your name, but you went to
01:12:44.400
Afghanistan, saw the fields of poppies, and then they asked, what's going on? They used to be an
0.99
01:12:49.260
exporter of food, but now Afghanistan is just growing these poppies. And he was told, now this is just his
0.51
01:12:57.500
report. That the reason that the U.S. is totally happy that Afghanistan is growing gigantic fields
01:13:06.920
of poppies, which turns into, obviously, opioids, is because almost all of it is shipped to Iran and
01:13:15.540
Russia, and that the reason we do it is to weaken their society. Now, I don't know if that's true,
0.95
01:13:24.040
somebody's saying John Kirakow. Now, that at least fits the description of a name that you're not
01:13:39.580
already all familiar with. Is that right? I'm not sure if it's him. All right, maybe it might be
01:13:48.300
Kirakow, if I'm saying it right. Anyway, do you believe that version of it? Do you believe that
01:13:56.180
the U.S. is encouraging? There he is. What's his name? Yeah. So, here's what he looks like.
01:14:09.360
So, here's the individual I'm talking about. I'm hearing his name is John Kirakow.
01:14:18.300
All right. I think we're getting close. Anyway, I apologize to you, John. I'll get your name right.
01:14:26.640
So, do you believe that? Do you believe that the U.S. is literally trying to destroy the social fabric
01:14:32.560
of Russia and Iran by making sure that Afghanistan is sending unlimited amounts of opioids to them?
01:14:40.460
I don't know. I'm going to put a pin in that one and say, an ex-CIA guy?
01:14:52.980
I'm not going to automatically believe the person whose job was professional liar.
01:15:00.900
If your job has ever been professional liar, that's what CIA is, right? You know, you have to put a pin in
01:15:09.400
and say, I'll need a little more verification. Not quite there. But that's a scary one.
01:15:18.980
Apparently, the NOAA, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Association, right? So, they're the ones who are
01:15:31.060
main agency for climate change and weather and stuff. And I guess Trump wants to cut their budget
01:15:41.040
and maybe reduce their staff from 12,000 to 6,000. Now, you know what I'm going to say.
01:15:50.500
So, if all of our climate change policies are driven by climate models,
01:15:57.260
wouldn't it be weird if we could go years and years and years and I, at least I, who watch the news and
01:16:08.860
podcasts all the time, I've never seen anybody who was involved in making a climate model who was asked
01:16:15.680
questions about how you do it and how reliable is it and is your data good and what assumptions do
01:16:21.420
you put into that? Doesn't that seem weird? Let me say it again. The climate models are driving
01:16:30.380
trillions of dollars of expense and they're very controversial in the sense of, you know, are they
01:16:36.520
real or are they not real? And yet, there's no news entity, no podcast, which has ever had somebody on
01:16:45.420
say, okay, you make models. Yours is one of the famous ones. Tell us what assumptions went into it.
01:16:51.780
How many variables are involved? Have you ever had to update it? If you modified it, why did you think
01:16:58.420
it was right before? If it was right before, but then you added some new assumptions and now you say
01:17:06.180
it's right, well, you were just as confident before, before you adjusted it. So, how can you be sure you're
01:17:14.700
right? Just think about all the questions that I would ask. Yeah, we're getting a confirmation. It's
01:17:21.560
John Kiriakou. Kiriakou. So, sorry, John. Anyway, so as long as the dog is not barking and the dog is
01:17:34.000
no climate model creators are ever on TV or are ever asked the question and they are the most important
01:17:41.800
people behind trillions of dollars of expense. So, instead, we talk to the politicians. Do you know
01:17:48.920
what the politicians say? Why would you ask me that question, you science denier? And we're done here.
01:17:56.600
You tell me, can you come up with any reason that for years the news ignores the people who make the
01:18:04.900
climate models? Like there's not one of them who can talk in public to defend trillions of dollars
01:18:12.520
of policy? That's the biggest dog that's ever not barked. And how many of you didn't notice?
01:18:21.940
We act like whoever makes the models, that must be good and those must be accurate. Now let's talk to
01:18:28.400
the politicians. No, you're making me think past the sale. If I'm talking to the politician,
01:18:35.280
I've already accepted that maybe the science was right. But if you haven't accepted that the science
01:18:42.880
is right, the climate model part, not the science in general, but just the climate models,
01:18:48.400
you need to go back to that. Let's find out if the models are right and then we'll talk to the
01:18:53.860
politicians. But you got to do the models first. Nobody will do that. Well, Trump signed some order
01:19:02.760
according to CNBC that's going to pause enforcement of the foreign bribery ban. So the United States made
01:19:11.520
it illegal to bribe other countries for business reasons, even though the government itself bribes
01:19:17.660
other countries to do coups all the time. But it was illegal for Americans to do it, but not
01:19:23.780
so illegal for other company countries to do it. So what would be the common sense way to handle
01:19:29.840
that? Okay. Common sense. All the other countries we're competing with are bribing. Bribing is how
01:19:37.560
you get anything done in some countries, too many of them really. We will be a weak, bad country if our
01:19:45.880
economy fails. And the only way to compete is by bribe bribing people in other countries.
01:19:52.940
What would be the common sense way to handle that? To allow bribing in other countries.
01:19:59.380
Now, I'm going to add one wrinkle. I think it should be completely legal for big companies to
01:20:07.380
literally bribe. But I would want them to have to reveal it to at least our intelligence
01:20:15.660
operatives. So, you know, you could say, well, there's a chance of leaking, but I don't think
01:20:22.740
it's a big risk because it'd be legal. You know, you'd be leaking that somebody did something that's
01:20:28.380
completely legal. But I don't think we want to publicize it. I just think it needs to be revealed.
01:20:36.240
So there should be some, I'm going to call a half transparency, meaning that we guarantee that
01:20:41.820
somebody who's, you know, important in the government knows what's happening. So maybe it's
01:20:46.840
not the intelligence people. Maybe it's Congress. You know, maybe there needs to be an updated list of
01:20:52.860
all the bribes. So if you're, if you've got the right, let's say security clearance, and you just
01:20:58.740
ask for it, maybe it's in a skiff or something, you can say, oh, this company bribed this thing,
01:21:04.100
this company bribed that. Now, I think we live in a world where, and this is speculation, so I'll take a,
01:21:11.080
I'll take a better opinion on this if somebody has one. I think it was necessary for America to
01:21:16.780
strong arm other countries for the past hundred years, because it was the only way to control them.
01:21:24.840
But we might've reached the point where it just makes more sense to bribe the people we need to
01:21:28.780
bribe and not run a coup because the coups have all kinds of, you know, hidden costs. But what if
01:21:36.780
you just bribe people to get into the country and stay there and make some money? If we're at a point
01:21:42.140
where bribing makes more sense than organizing a coup, then we should get rid of this, this
01:21:48.420
prohibition about bribing. All right. So apparently, according to the Guardian, there was this US
01:22:00.320
funded social network. So meaning a fake social network of people who are attacking the critics
01:22:07.060
of pesticides, which would include RFK Jr. And so apparently they had some kind of a private website
01:22:15.180
where they would give the information of all the critics of pesticides so that you could better attack
01:22:24.120
the critics of pesticides. That's right. Pesticides are quite popular. I don't know what is
01:22:36.920
that or is not healthy about pesticides, but I can tell you that when I stopped eating all processed
01:22:44.440
foods and wheat, sure felt better. All right. So apparently that was at least part of financed
01:22:52.180
by US taxpayer dollars. Did you know that you were financing a fake network of people to go after
01:22:59.740
critics of our poison food supply? You were paying for somebody to criticize RFK Jr. and other people
01:23:10.860
like me, because I'm also a critic of the pesticides. So can I go back to my earlier point?
01:23:18.740
If you believe in 2025 that our elections are not rigged, you're a fucking idiot. Everything's
1.00
01:23:29.060
rigged. Nothing's real. Black Lives Matter, totally artificial. January 6, Charlottesville, fake news,
0.90
01:23:40.260
fake. Yeah, the elections are the only thing that are real. Sure. But at least we're smarter in 2025.
01:23:48.740
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what I want to talk about today. I can feel the heavy equipment
01:23:55.220
outside my window. I hope you can't hear that. But I'm going to say hi to the locals people,
01:24:01.680
the subscribers. And subscribe to Dilbert if you want to see Dilbert joining the Doge project. He
01:24:08.340
joins Doge today. He'll only be doing that for this week because he has to get back to his regular life.
01:24:15.140
All right. People on X and YouTube and Rumble, thanks for joining. I hope to see you tomorrow. Same time,