Episode 2785 CWSA 03⧸21⧸25
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 14 minutes
Words per Minute
137.19087
Summary
Trump wants to get rid of the Department of Education, and it s bad for kids. And it s good for your health, according to science, which is why you should drink a lot of coffee. Plus, a new AI-driven method that can predict the weather with very little resources.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:11.320
It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time.
00:00:15.480
But if you'd like to take this experience up to levels that nobody can even understand
00:00:20.100
with their tiny, shiny human brain, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or
00:00:24.180
chalice, a dine, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:32.700
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing
00:00:39.140
It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:52.560
Well, I have it on good authority that anxiety is high today for a lot of people.
00:01:08.140
So all of your anxiety, you can already feel it draining out of your body, can't you?
00:01:14.080
Do some Huberman breathing while you're listening.
00:01:17.520
That's two long inhales through your nose, one after another, followed by exhaling out
00:01:30.560
But speaking of health, did you know that there's a new study?
00:01:37.880
You won't believe it, but it turns out that coffee is good for you.
00:01:41.260
There's a study the Journal of Nutrition is writing about, in which they found out that
00:01:47.120
consuming more than two cups of coffee, as long as it's not sweetened, it was associated
00:01:53.860
with reduced overall cancer incidence and mortality.
00:01:59.660
Coffee can help you prevent cancer, according to science, which is never wrong.
00:02:11.160
You know how, for your entire life, you've complained about how, yeah, they can't even
00:02:18.960
You know, how are they going to do this or that when they can't even predict tomorrow's
00:02:23.800
Well, apparently there's an AI-driven method, according to The Guardian, that will be able
00:02:30.560
to predict the weather with very little resources.
00:02:33.480
Something like a single researcher with a desktop computer will be able to have more accurate
00:02:41.620
forecasts than all the computers that they're using now to do forecasts.
00:02:46.340
With way less energy, thousands of times less computing power.
00:02:52.720
So you'll be able to sit at your desk and predict what your weather will be tomorrow.
00:02:59.020
So I guess the job of a news weather person might be a risk when you can just go to your
00:03:08.400
computer and it will have a better idea than all the experts.
00:03:12.000
Well, as you know, Trump signed an executive order to get rid of the Department of Education
00:03:17.960
Education and probably had one of the best, I guess, presentations.
00:03:26.220
So he was surrounded by school-age kids who were all at their own little desks and they
00:03:35.820
So he signs his executive order while the kids are signing their executive orders.
00:03:43.540
But the funny thing is, you know, the reason that they're getting rid of the Department of
00:03:49.760
Education, the critics say it's bad for the children.
00:03:54.720
So he surrounds himself with all these happy children.
00:03:57.400
And then Trump says that giving the power back to the states might be better for the teachers
00:04:19.760
But the executive order can't actually get rid of it.
00:04:28.320
If only the Republicans agree, they can vote it out.
00:04:35.640
You know, it can stop it from functioning, even though it still exists.
00:04:41.720
But yeah, Trump says teachers will be, quote, better rewarded with the education in the hands
00:04:48.360
Now, let me give you how the news has treated this.
00:04:53.440
Don't you think the most important question about the Department of Education is what will
00:05:08.000
Most of you, if you're Republican, your answer to the question would be, well, I guess it
00:05:14.980
didn't do anything because, you know, scores of tests never went up.
00:05:28.460
And then the Democrats are being told it would be the end of education or something.
00:05:36.640
They think it will cut funding for the disabled and cut funding for low-income people.
00:05:45.520
But it hasn't even been decided if the funding that was once in the Department of Education
00:06:04.260
It might just be a, you know, less administrative costs because you just get rid of an entire
00:06:10.040
department, but maybe, maybe the disabled will get the same amount of money.
00:06:15.840
It'll just be distributed to the states instead.
00:06:22.740
This is one of the biggest stories in the country.
00:06:25.880
And how many of you even knew what would be cut or what would be different?
00:06:34.700
I had to actually, you know, do a little research even to get as far as I got, and I don't think
00:06:46.300
I think Trump's doing a good job of just acting like no scores went up, and so I guess we're
00:06:53.800
Anyway, so if it can't be defended better than it has been defended, I think that's a pretty
00:07:01.340
good reason to get rid of it, because the arguments for it only make sense if the states don't
00:07:09.380
pick up that slack, and we don't know yet that they won't, because there might be funding
00:07:18.460
Well, meanwhile, Bernie Sanders and AOC are doing their anti-oligarch tour together.
00:07:29.520
It must be just so hard for them to go to Las Vegas and do an anti-oligarch.
00:07:36.740
So the funny thing is, according to journalist Batya Ungar Sargan, who she was on Fox Business,
00:07:45.080
and she says that there are twice as many billionaires backing, who backed Kamala Harris compared to
00:07:51.760
Trump, twice as many, and that 65% of the rich vote Democrat, so rich people are two-thirds voting
00:08:00.440
Democrat, and 75% of hedge fund managers also vote Democrat, and so there you have it.
00:08:11.540
So once again, the Democrats are the living embodiment of the thing that they're accusing
00:08:18.480
Republicans of, do you remember when they accused Republicans of being domestic terrorists, or
00:08:26.660
at least the white supremacists, which they conflate with being Republican, and then we're
00:08:31.820
watching all kinds of domestic terrorism, that's 100% Democrat.
00:08:42.420
Whatever they're accusing you of, that's probably what they're doing.
00:08:49.000
I was reading the Amuse account on X that had that take.
00:08:57.560
Now, to me, the best filter on Democrats is the theater kids, because they seem to pick things
00:09:10.580
So they send theatrical AOC and theatrical Bernie Sanders, and then they make them, you know,
00:09:24.700
So they turn them into like an entertainment duo.
00:09:36.680
Well, anyway, so it seems to me this anti-oligarch thing is just like a play they took on the road.
00:09:46.760
It's just completely unmoored from reality in any way.
00:09:51.440
So Trump's got like a few billionaires to back him.
00:09:54.480
And, you know, obviously Musk is the biggest one.
00:09:58.560
But it seems completely artificial, as do the Tesla things, as do a lot of things that do.
00:10:06.200
So the theater kids put on a play, take it on the road.
00:10:11.640
All right, let's check in with the other theater kids.
00:10:13.700
We've got Gavin Newsom, who apparently claimed on his podcast that no one in his office ever used the word Latinx, Latinx.
00:10:28.660
Remember for a while we were told that the Latin or the Hispanic community liked to be called Latinx, with an X on the end?
00:10:39.880
And you never heard anybody ever use it in the real world.
00:10:43.680
And it turns out the Hispanic community wasn't really crazy about it at all.
00:10:50.780
So poor Gavin Newsom is trying to become more of a common sense middle ground guy, so he has some chance of national office.
00:11:02.280
But it looks like he's trying to position himself for running for president.
00:11:07.460
And but Erin Burnett of CNN on her show, she runs a compilation of Newsom actually saying Latinx without being without joking about it.
00:11:20.760
So apparently he's the person in his own office that was using it in public a number of times, and he wasn't using it ironically or as a as a criticism.
00:11:33.340
So now he's trying to sell us that no one in his office ever used the word while while we have video compilation of him using the word typical.
00:11:42.200
So I'd like to give the Democrats another pro tip.
00:11:51.540
If you're trying to be the next Joe Rogan, the thing you can't leave out is the authentic part.
00:12:00.660
But the thing that the Democrats get wrong every time is they literally think that authentic means pretending to be authentic.
00:12:17.060
He's pretending to be authentic to try to become the next Joe Rogan without quite understanding that the public can see through inauthentic so easily.
00:12:40.440
Is there anything he's ever done that ever struck you as inauthentic?
00:13:00.820
Like what part of anything he's ever done strikes you as even a little bit, even a little bit inauthentic?
00:13:16.080
It's completely unavailable because their world, I mean this literally, this is not hyperbole, the Democrat world is completely artificial.
00:13:27.800
So they don't live in a world where connecting to anything in the real part of the world has ever made sense.
00:13:35.640
It's a complete artificial, theatrical, imaginary, we can read minds, we see domestic terrorists under every chair, we can read Trump's mind, and we know he's going to steal your democracy.
00:13:55.160
So I think they've actually lost the ability to even police themselves with authenticity.
00:14:04.900
And I'm not even sure they know what it feels like or what it looks like or what it would, you know, how you would act authentic.
00:14:16.700
Anyway, the authentic part is not optional if you want to be the next Jill Rogan.
00:14:31.520
So I think former Democrat Representative Cori Bush, so I guess she was defeated recently,
00:14:39.600
but she's the member of Cori Bush, she was one of the squad kind of people.
00:14:44.640
Her husband was charged with two counts of wire fraud, something about accepting payments during COVID, I think,
00:15:02.360
Has anybody noticed that prominent, I'm going to just say prominent,
00:15:07.820
and has anybody noticed that prominent Democrats are so often married to criminals?
00:15:19.060
How many times have we seen prominent Democrat?
00:15:31.940
Wife is collecting money from USAID NGO for doing just about nothing.
00:15:43.280
Now, I suppose the politicians themselves have some questions to answer to,
00:15:56.680
If you see a Democrat that's not married to a criminal,
00:16:03.920
because they only have two kinds of spouses, criminals and spies.
00:16:15.880
who has worked for a number of different news outlets,
00:16:25.240
that MSNBC is the only one who told her what she could and could not say.
00:16:30.920
Are you surprised that MSNBC didn't let her have her own opinions?
00:16:37.880
She had to agree with sort of the company opinion on stuff.
00:16:43.180
And Greta said, that's why I got fired at MSNBC.
00:16:54.120
Imagine working for a company that's so corrupt
00:17:01.720
that when they tell you honestly what they want from you,
00:17:12.980
because your brain can't wrap itself around the fact
00:17:30.020
Now, what else do you need to know about MSNBC?
00:17:37.440
is if you know somebody who's getting their news primarily from MSNBC,
00:17:49.720
most of our news sources are biased left or biased right.
00:18:00.940
and being told what you can and cannot say on the air.
00:18:11.560
All right, here's a story I've been waiting for.
00:18:38.620
how he's a different Vice President than Kamala Harris was.
00:18:51.300
well, I don't have four shots of vodka before every meeting.
00:19:03.220
So the New York Post is reporting it as he joked.
00:19:53.080
It's funny that they would even run him for office.
00:21:13.420
I mean, maybe I would have floated it more than,