Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2788 CWSA 03⧸24⧸25

00:00:00.000 Bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum. 0.97

00:00:05.540 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:09.660 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:12.200 You've never had a better time, but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels

00:00:17.240 that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains,

00:00:20.480 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or gels, a stein, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:25.180 a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:28.040 I like coffee.

00:00:30.000 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day,

00:00:33.680 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:35.160 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:39.400 Go.

00:00:44.820 Divine.

00:00:47.260 Godlike.

00:00:50.340 Well, let's start with science.

00:00:52.820 You know, science is important because there are many things we don't understand about the world.

00:00:57.720 And thanks to our intrepid scientists, they can fill in the gaps for us.

00:01:03.880 Let's see what they've got for us today.

00:01:06.540 According to SciPost, Eric Nolan is writing,

00:01:09.920 physical attractiveness far outweighs other traits in online dating success.

00:01:15.720 So, it's a good thing they studied that because I was thinking that physical attractiveness

00:01:24.700 was way down on the list of things that people cared about in dating.

00:01:29.560 No, I wasn't.

00:01:32.400 They could have saved a lot of money if they just asked me,

00:01:35.500 Scott, what do you think about physical attractiveness on the list of things that people care about in online dating?

00:01:43.100 Hmm.

00:01:43.880 Hmm.

00:01:44.420 Let me confer with every sentient being in the entire universe.

00:01:48.720 Everybody?

00:01:49.500 Okay, we're all on the same page.

00:01:51.460 It's the biggest thing.

00:01:52.580 All right.

00:01:55.340 I've got a special theme for you today.

00:01:58.180 The theme is all the Trump stuff is working.

00:02:02.920 Everything's good.

00:02:05.020 You okay with that?

00:02:06.700 So, we're going to ignore any bad news.

00:02:09.000 There might be some.

00:02:09.960 I didn't see much bad news today.

00:02:11.700 But there's a whole bunch of stuff that will make you happy.

00:02:14.440 Some of it may be happy for entirely wrong reasons.

00:02:21.540 So, this one's a...

00:02:23.960 It'll make you happy that the anti-Trump people are not doing well.

00:02:28.740 But you shouldn't be too happy.

00:02:31.420 And I'll tell you why.

00:02:33.120 So, for example, De Niro...

00:02:35.460 Breitbart is reporting on this.

00:02:37.240 De Niro has a new movie out called The Alto Knights.

00:02:40.380 And it will only gross around $3 million.

00:02:48.760 That's about as bad as you can get.

00:02:51.180 $3 million.

00:02:53.780 Meanwhile, Rachel Zegler, who is no fan of President Trump,

00:02:58.300 her Disney movie has opened.

00:03:02.520 And it looks like Snow White is going to make...

00:03:05.880 It's the worst opening of a live-action Disney movie ever.

00:03:11.600 Or in a very long time.

00:03:13.700 So, it's one of the worst things ever.

00:03:16.760 Somebody sent me a picture of Disney's board of directors.

00:03:21.640 And I'm going to say a good thing about Disney.

00:03:26.020 You know, usually, lately, I've been piling on.

00:03:29.460 But I've got to say, they're nailing the DEI stuff.

00:03:34.180 Their diversity on their board is excellent.

00:03:38.200 Their movies need a little work.

00:03:41.380 Now, this is good news, bad news for me in California especially.

00:03:45.220 Because I really, really, really, really, really want Hollywood and movies and TV to work.

00:03:52.680 Because it's a big part of our economy.

00:03:54.860 And it used to be a big part of my entertainment.

00:03:57.060 So, I want it to work.

00:04:00.140 But it looks like they're doing everything they can to make sure it doesn't.

00:04:06.820 But, how would you like some more good news about California?

00:04:10.300 You ready for this?

00:04:11.420 I don't know if I can even believe this next thing.

00:04:14.460 So, Jim Hoft, the Gateway Pundit, is reporting.

00:04:17.200 There's a statewide poll in California that says that in 2026...

00:04:24.060 Well, let me just read it.

00:04:28.880 There's a statewide survey from Decipher AI.

00:04:31.940 And it says that a staggering 48% of likely California voters are now open to voting for a Republican governor in 2026.

00:04:42.660 Only 25% of Californians are registered Republican.

00:04:52.460 And yet, 48% are looking at, you know, if it's the right candidate, we might go for a Republican this time.

00:05:03.260 Why?

00:05:05.440 Well, here's an example.

00:05:06.920 So, these are some figures also from the polling, I guess.

00:05:13.500 83% of voters say gas prices are too high in California.

00:05:17.800 What are your gas prices?

00:05:19.960 Because our gas prices are well over $5 a gallon.

00:05:23.600 But I understand that the nation is closer to three.

00:05:28.980 Yeah, we noticed.

00:05:31.620 69% think California's political leaders have not done enough to bring down energy utility costs.

00:05:38.240 Yeah, we noticed.

00:05:40.340 We noticed you're doing a terrible job in California on energy costs.

00:05:45.280 71% believe the governor and legislative leaders have not addressed California's high cost of living.

00:05:51.960 Yes, that's exactly what we think.

00:05:54.920 73% support fully funding anti-crime Prop 36, which has not occurred.

00:06:01.280 Yeah, we'd like to fund anti-crime.

00:06:04.140 Can you please stop the crime?

00:06:07.280 How about 72% feel homelessness still is a big problem?

00:06:11.680 Yes.

00:06:13.000 I'm amazed that it's only 72%.

00:06:15.660 60% oppose free health care to undocumented illegal immigrants.

00:06:21.000 62% support a fully independent investigation of the recent L.A. wildfires.

00:06:28.600 And only 24% of Californians think that biological male transgenders should compete in female sports.

00:06:39.220 That's pretty much running the table.

00:06:42.060 You know what I mean?

00:06:42.800 So the Republican policies have completely run the table.

00:06:50.400 The majority of Californians are Republican.

00:06:53.400 They just don't realize it yet.

00:06:56.240 You know, they're sort of caught in their little inertia.

00:06:59.080 But this really does suggest that the right candidate, and it would take a special candidate.

00:07:07.180 You know, it would take a, you know, Reagan, Trump, DeSantis, kind of a quality person.

00:07:15.160 But it's winnable.

00:07:16.300 And I don't want to see another weak Republican candidate for governor, because I've usually not even known their names.

00:07:28.520 Are you telling me that in all of California, we can't find one legitimate political superstar?

00:07:35.260 Or somebody who can walk and talk and just agree with these things that the public agrees with?

00:07:40.800 You don't even have to be smart.

00:07:42.760 You can just look at the polls and say, all right, I'm running for governor, and I'm going to lower your gas prices.

00:07:51.220 And you could just go right down the list.

00:07:53.800 You know, the policies write themselves.

00:07:55.220 Well, meanwhile, Attorney General Pam Bondi has said that they've created a Tesla Terrorism Task Force,

00:08:05.760 specifically to look into the domestic terrorism against Tesla assets.

00:08:11.700 They've got three people in custody right now.

00:08:14.900 And she says this is domestic terrorism.

00:08:19.320 That's exactly what I want to hear. 0.73

00:08:21.060 I don't want to hear, oh, the biggest problem in the United States is white supremacist terrorism.

00:08:29.940 No, it's not.

00:08:31.560 Not even close.

00:08:34.800 However, according to Zero Edge, Tesla has added a new threat detected mode, maybe just to the truck.

00:08:46.260 I don't know if this is for all the vehicles or maybe just the Cybertruck.

00:08:51.060 But it's going to be a louder than normal alarm, and it could be music, I think, if it detects some foul play.

00:09:00.780 So if it looks like somebody is going to vandalize it or it does get vandalized, it's going to get really loud.

00:09:08.700 Now, the question that's unanswered, is there any AI involved?

00:09:13.400 Because wouldn't you rather catch it before it happened?

00:09:18.400 And here's my question.

00:09:20.400 Do you think that Tesla's AI could not detect who's going to vandalize it just by seeing them coming?

00:09:30.400 I feel like it could.

00:09:34.320 I feel like you could detect a vandal about at least 10 seconds before they vandalize.

00:09:42.720 Because the videos I've seen, they all have that look, right?

00:09:46.620 They've got a mask on or they've got that classic lefty look.

00:09:52.400 They've got to always have a backpack.

00:09:53.840 You know, it seems like they've got a backpack too often.

00:09:57.580 And then there's always some preparation, and there's always something in their hand, like a key.

00:10:03.400 I feel like the AI could detect that before the vandalism.

00:10:07.300 And it would be kind of funny if it started yelling before it happened.

00:10:10.860 Now, that would be awesome.

00:10:11.920 I don't think that's the feature.

00:10:13.540 But it feels doable, which is weird.

00:10:21.320 Anyway, according to the Babylon Bee, they've got a headline that says,

00:10:24.780 Democrats say fire at Tesla facility likely caused by climate change.

00:10:30.900 That's not true.

00:10:32.600 So the Babylon Bee is a satirical publication, if you didn't know.

00:10:36.940 So it's not true that Democrats think fire at Tesla facility is caused by climate change.

00:10:42.300 That would be silly.

00:10:43.540 They believe it's caused by DEI being improperly implemented.

00:10:49.700 No, I'm just making that up, too.

00:10:51.580 That's satirical.

00:10:54.020 But here's what I observe.

00:10:57.520 Does it seem to you that it's extra obvious that our opinions are assigned to us?

00:11:04.240 Now, you might say, okay, but not the Republicans.

00:11:09.980 Maybe there's a difference.

00:11:11.360 I don't know.

00:11:11.860 But you can see on the Democrat side that they immediately snap the grid on whatever the new message is.

00:11:20.840 And they just go, oh, it's going to be a scalpel.

00:11:24.840 We need a scalpel, not a chainsaw.

00:11:26.960 And they just immediately embrace whatever the assigned opinion is.

00:11:34.280 And, you know, you could argue maybe that happens on both sides.

00:11:37.660 Maybe.

00:11:38.240 I don't know.

00:11:39.320 But I saw an interesting article.

00:11:41.020 I wish I could remember the author, so I feel bad talking about it.

00:11:46.280 But I saw an expose about, maybe that's too strong, about David Axelrod and his wizardry with the Democratic Party and Obama.

00:12:00.440 And apparently he pioneered the persuasion that would get you to do something you weren't inclined to do.

00:12:11.560 So instead of just, you know, giving you the usual, we're great, the other side's bad, you know, the normal political stuff.

00:12:18.840 He figured out how to get people to vote for black candidates.

00:12:27.540 And Obama was one of his first experiments.

00:12:29.560 And it was sort of this weird permission thing where he would give them a reason to do the opposite of what they would normally do.

00:12:40.720 Now, in the Obama case, the reason was if you were being blamed of being a racist or you're worried about being a racist or you just wanted to make sure everybody knew you weren't,

00:12:53.560 the easiest way to do that would be to say that you supported Obama.

00:12:57.920 And here's the thing I hate about that.

00:13:04.100 That's sort of the reason that I was pro-Obama back in those days.

00:13:10.060 And I'm aware of it.

00:13:12.140 I'm aware that it was a social signaling thing.

00:13:16.100 Not entirely.

00:13:17.720 You know, the argument I would use mostly when I talked about it is that it wouldn't be good to get past never having a black president. 1.00

00:13:25.960 And I thought, well, he seems very capable.

00:13:29.180 He speaks well.

00:13:30.120 He presents himself well.

00:13:32.220 I didn't have a big problem with it at the time.

00:13:34.580 But I also didn't know how much destruction would be, you know, coming out of it.

00:13:39.800 So I call that the fake because.

00:13:44.660 The fake because is giving you a reason that just allows you to do the thing you wanted to do.

00:13:51.440 And so the fake because was, oh, he's very capable, speaks well, he's inspiring, makes people feel good.

00:14:01.720 So then I could say, oh, OK, look at me.

00:14:05.120 I'm not a racist.

00:14:06.000 I'm supporting a black candidate for president.

00:14:08.340 So I was a little shocked that I might have been dragged into that persuasion net that was very intentional.

00:14:21.240 And it turns out that Axelrod has, you know, some family background in advertising.

00:14:27.660 And I think he comes by his persuasion skills legitimately, meaning he was exposed to it early and, you know, he marinated in it for a long time.

00:14:39.360 So a lot of what we see is a sort of an Axelrod driven situation.

00:14:47.540 Now, you could argue that the that the Obama term, you know, lasted longer than Obama and that he was still kind of in charge, even though he wasn't president.

00:14:59.400 But it feels like that era has ended.

00:15:02.320 It feels like Trump, you know, just ripped that up by the roots.

00:15:07.880 So we'll see.

00:15:09.360 Anyway, according to Breitbart, Rosie O'Donnell has given an interview in her new home in Ireland.

00:15:19.740 So, as you know, Rosie moved to Ireland to get away from all the horribleness that is Trump.

00:15:25.920 And she is now an election denier.

00:15:29.220 And she thinks that somehow Elon Musk stole the 2024 election because he owns the Internet.

00:15:35.140 She actually said that, that he kind of owns the Internet, so he fixed the election.

00:15:43.080 I love how crazy she is because it just puts everything in perspective.

00:15:51.700 So I decided to go to Perplexity, my favorite AI.

00:15:56.340 And I asked her this question, huh, you know, she moved to Ireland of all places.

00:16:03.300 And I said, what are the percentage of white versus black residents or even just non-white residents of Ireland?

00:16:13.720 If Perplexity is right, there's only 1% of Ireland that's non-white. 1.00

00:16:19.160 Did Rosie move to the least diverse place on the entire planet? 0.60

00:16:26.460 Is there any place that's less diverse than that?

00:16:30.700 Now, I don't know if, you know, maybe the data is wrong.

00:16:33.380 I got it from Perplexity.

00:16:34.560 But it does seem that she went to a place that would be the opposite of her own philosophy, wouldn't it?

00:16:44.180 Hmm, interesting.

00:16:46.420 Maybe she'll have a president, a new president soon. 1.00

00:16:53.100 We'll see.

00:16:54.760 Anyway, according to the Daily Wire, Ryan Saavedra is writing,

00:16:59.220 the Pentagon is well on its way on this plan to create a buffer zone on our southern border.

00:17:06.780 Now, when I read that, I thought, hmm, buffer zone.

00:17:10.400 This could be interesting.

00:17:11.980 What do you need a buffer zone for?

00:17:13.960 And then I saw that the buffer zone is only going to be, let's see,

00:17:18.000 its width would be only, what, 20 yards?

00:17:23.920 Kind of a tiny little buffer.

00:17:26.580 Yeah, it's only 20 yards deep.

00:17:29.220 Now, how many of you, if you haven't seen the story,

00:17:32.620 how many of you know why we want to create a buffer zone that's only 20 yards?

00:17:39.320 It turns out it's really clever.

00:17:42.100 Because if you make the buffer zone a military base,

00:17:46.300 so you can just, you know, designate it a military base,

00:17:49.380 it just happens to be only 20 yards wide,

00:17:52.200 then the military can hold people until the authorities get there to process them.

00:18:02.200 And so at the moment, because of the current laws of the land,

00:18:05.880 if you're in the military,

00:18:07.360 you can't be doing domestic law and order stuff.

00:18:11.940 So the military can only do military stuff.

00:18:14.960 They're not allowed to do, you know, just arrest somebody.

00:18:18.020 And they can't hold somebody.

00:18:19.860 So even if they caught somebody at the border,

00:18:22.820 they wouldn't be allowed to hold them.

00:18:24.620 Unless, unless that person was trespassing on a military base.

00:18:35.500 So apparently this is some kind of clever end run

00:18:38.520 to make it, you know,

00:18:41.100 to make as much of the border as possible,

00:18:44.140 a 20 yard wide military base.

00:18:47.540 So if the military catches somebody on that 20 yard swath,

00:18:51.920 they can hold them until the,

00:18:54.520 I would say indefinitely,

00:18:56.240 but there's probably some limit,

00:18:57.720 but they wouldn't have any reason that they have to release them.

00:19:01.100 They can just wait for the,

00:19:02.340 for the border control to come and process them.

00:19:06.240 So that is so clever that I have to give some props to that.

00:19:12.880 Now they haven't quite implemented it,

00:19:14.780 but it looks like they're well on their way to,

00:19:16.440 to doing it.

00:19:17.400 And they can't do the whole border at once.

00:19:20.060 There's some kind of rule that says they can only do,

00:19:22.460 you know, a piece at a time,

00:19:23.880 but they could do a piece at a time and then,

00:19:26.800 then they can get there.

00:19:29.580 Well,

00:19:30.000 according to Rusty Weiss,

00:19:31.500 who's writing for Red State,

00:19:32.900 Canada is seeing this huge crush of illegals fleeing the U.S.

00:19:38.880 because of Trump's border policies and his immigration policies.

00:19:43.840 So kind of makes sense,

00:19:45.940 doesn't it?

00:19:46.720 That if you were in this country and you were,

00:19:48.860 you were high on the list of people to be deported,

00:19:52.460 you would immediately escape to Canada where the rules are maybe a little

00:19:56.320 friendlier.

00:19:56.760 And even actually a member of the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel,

00:20:04.620 a smuggler confirmed that business is booming in the opposite direction of the

00:20:11.640 illegals.

00:20:13.000 So a lot of them are self-deporting to the great white North.

00:20:17.740 I guess the 60 minutes overtime segment had that news.

00:20:21.540 Now I have a message to Canada,

00:20:26.620 Canada,

00:20:27.520 you know,

00:20:28.680 you know,

00:20:29.780 what would cause that not to happen if you were a state?

00:20:35.640 Because if you were a state,

00:20:37.220 the immigration laws would be the same above the border as now,

00:20:40.740 but because you're not a state and because you're not controlling your border,

00:20:45.920 you're going to get big tariffs apparently.

00:20:50.280 And you're going to get a tsunami of,

00:20:53.000 uh, 0.86

00:20:54.260 criminal migrants. 0.98

00:20:58.520 So, 0.78

00:20:59.280 I mean,

00:21:00.520 we don't want that to happen,

00:21:02.320 but there's a way to avoid it.

00:21:06.000 If only you were a state.

00:21:08.760 All right.

00:21:09.440 I don't think Canada will ever become a state,

00:21:11.480 but the,

00:21:12.960 the argument for it may continue to strengthen.

00:21:17.340 We'll see.

00:21:18.440 When I found out my friend got a great deal on a wool coat from winners.

00:21:22.480 I started wondering is every fabulous item I see from winners.

00:21:27.040 Like that woman over there with the designer jeans. 1.00

00:21:29.820 Are those from winners?

00:21:31.560 Ooh,

00:21:32.140 are those beautiful gold earrings.

00:21:34.000 Did she pay full price or that leather tote or that cashmere sweater or those

00:21:37.860 knee-high boots,

00:21:39.060 that dress,

00:21:39.820 that jacket,

00:21:40.460 those shoes,

00:21:41.480 is anyone paying full price for anything?

00:21:44.480 Stop wondering,

00:21:45.700 start winning winners.

00:21:46.880 Find fabulous for less.

00:21:49.800 According to the post-millennial,

00:21:51.880 they're writing about a morning console poll that,

00:21:54.760 uh,

00:21:55.020 36% of Democrat voters still favor Kamala Harris for the 2028 presidential nominee.

00:22:01.580 Do you know what I say to that?

00:22:04.380 I'll drink to that.

00:22:08.380 Remember,

00:22:09.080 I'm only giving you good news,

00:22:10.560 good news for,

00:22:11.900 uh,

00:22:11.960 Trump supporters.

00:22:14.780 Can you think of any better news than 30,

00:22:17.620 36% of Democrats are still looking for Kamala Harris,

00:22:20.800 which would be way more than whoever is in second place?

00:22:24.400 I think Buttigieg might be in second place.

00:22:26.740 I think Buttigieg might be in second place.

00:22:29.360 So,

00:22:30.040 uh,

00:22:30.360 I'm pretty sure that a stronger candidate will emerge,

00:22:34.400 but maybe not,

00:22:36.760 maybe not.

00:22:39.000 So Senator Rand Paul did a great job of explaining something that I'd wondered

00:22:44.680 about.

00:22:45.240 He was on face the nation and Rand Paul is really good at this.

00:22:48.620 He's really good at explaining things so you can understand them.

00:22:53.420 So here's what I didn't understand.

00:22:56.380 Um,

00:22:57.520 so there,

00:22:58.360 there are two,

00:22:59.180 uh,

00:23:00.480 I guess,

00:23:01.380 rules or constitutional things or laws,

00:23:04.520 uh,

00:23:05.100 whatever you want to call them that are in conflict.

00:23:07.640 One of them is that if you're in the United States,

00:23:10.620 you don't have to be a citizen to be eligible for a,

00:23:14.900 you know,

00:23:15.180 full trial and process,

00:23:17.280 you know,

00:23:17.860 like a citizen.

00:23:18.820 So you would get your day in court.

00:23:21.180 You would get the same rights as anybody else would,

00:23:23.880 as long as you're in the country.

00:23:25.960 So I like that to me,

00:23:28.880 that seems fair that,

00:23:30.520 uh,

00:23:30.780 anybody gets caught into our legal system should have the same protections as

00:23:35.080 everybody else in the legal system.

00:23:36.720 So,

00:23:37.760 you know,

00:23:38.000 that,

00:23:38.300 that might less than bad guys get away with stuff,

00:23:41.300 but we accept that.

00:23:43.460 We accept that just so we don't put in jail,

00:23:46.000 some good people who,

00:23:47.220 you know,

00:23:47.860 wrongly got into the system somehow.

00:23:50.880 However,

00:23:51.820 that's in conflict with the fact that the president,

00:23:55.720 uh,

00:23:56.020 according to the alien enemies act can deport people who he thinks are alien

00:24:01.500 enemies.

00:24:03.000 So those two things can't,

00:24:04.960 can't exist together.

00:24:06.720 So it can't be true that everybody gets their day in court and proper

00:24:10.640 process at the same time,

00:24:12.740 the president can say,

00:24:13.940 well,

00:24:14.040 not these ones,

00:24:15.560 the,

00:24:15.840 these ones don't get proper process.

00:24:17.580 As long as we think they're gang members or bad guys,

00:24:20.440 we'll just send them back.

00:24:22.760 So that's what the Supreme court might decide.

00:24:26.300 Now,

00:24:27.160 Rand Paul,

00:24:28.220 Senator Paul says he predicts the Supreme court will uphold the Trump

00:24:32.320 administration enacting the alien enemies act.

00:24:36.760 Uh,

00:24:37.320 but that might be optimistic.

00:24:38.500 And I also wonder,

00:24:40.120 I'm a little confused about,

00:24:42.320 uh,

00:24:43.560 Oh,

00:24:43.780 he also thinks that,

00:24:44.960 uh,

00:24:45.520 that the Supreme court might,

00:24:48.960 uh,

00:24:49.440 limit the district judges from having nationwide rulings.

00:24:53.460 And I'm wondering,

00:24:54.660 does that happen at the same time?

00:24:56.340 So I need somebody who's smart about the Supreme court and process to tell

00:25:01.620 me that if,

00:25:02.940 if the question of a fair trial and due process versus the alien enemies

00:25:10.960 thing,

00:25:11.320 where the president can just say,

00:25:13.020 you're,

00:25:13.220 you're done.

00:25:13.740 Get out of here.

00:25:14.220 If that gets decided,

00:25:16.680 does that at the same time automatically decide that the district judges from

00:25:23.620 all over the country can't do these nationwide rulings or does that have to

00:25:28.500 be a separate case that's more specific to district judges and,

00:25:33.320 and,

00:25:34.400 uh,

00:25:34.720 nationwide rulings.

00:25:36.340 So I'm a little unclear about that part,

00:25:38.900 but,

00:25:40.080 um,

00:25:41.540 Senator Paul thinks that maybe both things could go true.

00:25:44.220 Trump's way.

00:25:46.880 Speaking of things going Trump's way,

00:25:49.460 Rolls Royce,

00:25:50.380 the British engineering giant there,

00:25:52.900 they're in,

00:25:53.600 uh,

00:25:54.640 they're in a lot of,

00:25:55.640 uh,

00:25:55.860 military stuff.

00:25:56.880 And they,

00:25:57.320 they also make small nuclear reactors for,

00:25:59.760 for commercial use.

00:26:02.840 Um,

00:26:03.240 they're going to move some of their manufacturing to the U S and why is that

00:26:06.820 because of tariffs.

00:26:09.960 So the,

00:26:10.920 the ones that they're moving to the U S might be things that they're making

00:26:14.200 in China.

00:26:15.600 So if,

00:26:16.560 if there's tariffs on Chinese goods,

00:26:18.720 they don't want to be a Chinese good because if it's made in China and then 0.96

00:26:23.380 shipped here,

00:26:23.960 it's a problem,

00:26:25.240 uh,

00:26:26.020 tariff wise,

00:26:26.640 it's a problem.

00:26:27.480 So they're going to move some of their manufacturing and of the countries that

00:26:31.320 are getting tariffed and into the United States,

00:26:33.820 which is exactly what,

00:26:37.920 uh,

00:26:38.320 Trump was hoping would happen.

00:26:41.600 Uh,

00:26:42.420 according to just the news,

00:26:43.700 John Solomon's writing about in Missouri.

00:26:47.120 Um,

00:26:47.560 I hadn't paid a lot of attention to this,

00:26:49.420 but Missouri had this,

00:26:50.820 um,

00:26:51.740 court case,

00:26:52.560 a legal,

00:26:53.580 I guess,

00:26:54.320 a lawsuit in which they were blaming China,

00:26:57.480 uh,

00:26:57.600 the country for,

00:26:59.580 uh,

00:27:01.440 COVID and for bad behavior and,

00:27:04.600 you know,

00:27:04.700 not telling us what was happening and acting like monopoly and hoarding the,

00:27:09.360 hoarding the,

00:27:10.880 uh,

00:27:11.880 masks and stuff like that.

00:27:13.760 So apparently China didn't bother to show up to defend themselves.

00:27:18.480 They were just going to ignore it.

00:27:20.080 And,

00:27:21.520 uh,

00:27:21.800 the lawsuit went Missouri's way.

00:27:24.900 So yeah,

00:27:25.760 attorney general Bailey.

00:27:27.340 And,

00:27:28.180 uh,

00:27:28.700 and there was a $24,

00:27:30.460 uh,

00:27:31.240 billion judgment.

00:27:33.200 So according to the Missouri legal system,

00:27:37.080 China owes Missouri $24 billion for just COVID related damage.

00:27:43.860 Um,

00:27:44.640 but as you can imagine,

00:27:47.060 China is just ignoring it and they have no intention of paying. 0.90

00:27:50.080 But now it turns out that Missouri is moving to seize Chinese owned farmland and other assets that are in their state.

00:27:59.800 But here's my question.

00:28:02.140 Are the farms owned by the country of China?

00:28:05.920 Are they owned by individual Chinese investors?

00:28:10.840 And can you take from individual Chinese investors assets because you want a case against the government of China?

00:28:19.120 So I guess I have some questions about that,

00:28:22.480 how that works,

00:28:23.200 but that fight is going on right now.

00:28:25.600 Here's a comment that,

00:28:30.840 uh,

00:28:31.400 JD Vance made about Denmark and his choice of words is what is terrific.

00:28:37.060 I'll tell you,

00:28:38.300 when it comes to choosing your words,

00:28:41.640 JD Vance is one of the best.

00:28:43.780 So I don't know yet that he's got the full persuasion stack.

00:28:48.900 You know,

00:28:49.020 he doesn't have a Trump level persuasion stack,

00:28:52.000 but wow,

00:28:53.620 is he good at choosing words.

00:28:55.700 So listen to this.

00:28:56.800 He's talking about Denmark,

00:28:58.240 uh,

00:28:59.060 uh,

00:28:59.600 on a recent interview.

00:29:00.460 And he said,

00:29:01.280 uh,

00:29:01.880 Denmark is not doing its job,

00:29:04.000 not being a good ally.

00:29:05.880 If that means we need to take more territorial interest in Greenland,

00:29:10.080 that is what president Trump is going to do.

00:29:12.900 Listen to that phrase,

00:29:15.000 territorial interest.

00:29:17.800 Isn't that just the perfect,

00:29:20.700 um,

00:29:21.540 doesn't tell you exactly how it would happen.

00:29:23.760 So it leaves open the mechanism,

00:29:26.020 but territorial interest makes something that could sound scary,

00:29:32.240 just sound a little bit ordinary.

00:29:36.180 And then he,

00:29:37.260 he frames it as Denmark,

00:29:39.500 not being a good ally,

00:29:41.400 which would include not being a good ally to Greenland,

00:29:45.500 which they control.

00:29:47.140 Now,

00:29:47.840 do you think that Denmark is doing a good job of protecting Greenland?

00:29:52.500 Not even close.

00:29:53.760 Do you think Denmark is doing a good job for its allies in America,

00:30:00.840 Canada,

00:30:01.480 the U S of protecting us by making sure that Greenland is,

00:30:06.340 you know,

00:30:07.240 defensively adequate?

00:30:09.500 No,

00:30:09.840 they're not.

00:30:10.900 So maybe those are not a good enough reason to take over or to buy or to

00:30:16.640 merge with another country,

00:30:17.920 but these are facts,

00:30:20.540 you know,

00:30:21.660 and there's sort of plainly obvious facts that Greenland is not

00:30:26.760 defensively adequate and that it needs to be.

00:30:30.440 And I don't think anybody disagrees with that.

00:30:32.880 No one who's paying attention disagrees.

00:30:36.120 But here's the second smart thing.

00:30:37.900 At the same time that JD is talking,

00:30:40.800 I'm going to say provocatively about Greenland.

00:30:45.200 And his wife,

00:30:47.880 Usha Vance is going to visit with one of the kids going to Greenland.

00:30:51.600 And here's what I love about this.

00:30:54.540 If that seems like just a stunt,

00:30:57.240 it really isn't.

00:30:59.340 Cause you remember when Charlie Kirk and Don Jr.

00:31:03.240 brought some people to Greenland,

00:31:05.420 here's what this feels like to me.

00:31:07.920 It feels like showing respect because she's going there and she doesn't have a

00:31:13.620 particular goal like that.

00:31:15.720 There's stuff.

00:31:16.140 She's going to visit some historical,

00:31:17.860 landmarks in Greenland essentially just paying respect.

00:31:26.060 Now,

00:31:26.700 how smart is that to have your,

00:31:30.980 in the case of Don Jr.

00:31:32.760 to have the president's son track all the way up to Greenland,

00:31:36.400 where it's not like he was going to be there anyway.

00:31:39.240 And of course,

00:31:40.000 he's got a big personality,

00:31:41.840 Charlie Kirk,

00:31:42.500 big personality.

00:31:43.920 And they just sort of impress the locals as just,

00:31:48.340 you know,

00:31:48.740 good blokes and show their respect.

00:31:52.760 Don't ask for anything.

00:31:54.620 They didn't ask for anything.

00:31:56.200 They just showed their respect.

00:31:57.600 And then they left,

00:31:59.300 said good things.

00:32:00.840 And now,

00:32:01.300 now JD Vance's wife and kid are going to go up there and just show the

00:32:06.640 respect.

00:32:07.080 This is so smart.

00:32:10.440 So smart.

00:32:12.140 Persuasion wise,

00:32:13.280 but also defense wise,

00:32:16.000 also politically wise,

00:32:18.280 just personally,

00:32:19.940 just,

00:32:20.420 you know,

00:32:20.840 how would you like to be treated if you're in Greenland?

00:32:23.920 You're going to have to lead with respect.

00:32:26.300 If you want to do anything,

00:32:28.640 you're going to have to lead with respect.

00:32:30.820 And I like that the Trump administration understands that.

00:32:34.800 And so they're,

00:32:35.400 they're going to make sure that respect,

00:32:36.900 that is just right at the top.

00:32:38.760 I like that.

00:32:41.800 Anyway,

00:32:42.420 you,

00:32:42.680 you know about AOC and Bernie Sanders anti-oligarch tour,

00:32:47.340 which I call a one man show.

00:32:50.020 Cause a lot of you don't know that's being played by the same character.

00:32:53.100 So there's one character who's playing both Bernie and AOC.

00:32:57.900 The only difference is they wear the same shirt.

00:33:00.540 It's this white button down tucking shirt.

00:33:03.820 So the quick change when they go from the Bernie to the AOC really is just,

00:33:10.520 you throw on the wig,

00:33:11.740 you take off the jacket.

00:33:12.880 There's no necktie.

00:33:14.260 So you just take off the jacket and then you slather on some makeup.

00:33:19.060 Now I think most of you know that you could turn a bowling ball into a living human if you had the right makeup.

00:33:26.220 So you just slap on the wig,

00:33:28.380 take off the jacket,

00:33:29.520 put on some makeup,

00:33:30.960 boom,

00:33:31.780 AOC.

00:33:32.160 No,

00:33:34.800 not really.

00:33:36.360 But they do kind of remind me of the same person.

00:33:41.700 But Bernie recently said about the border,

00:33:45.660 he said,

00:33:46.040 nobody thinks illegal immigration is appropriate.

00:33:48.560 So he seems to be happy with Trump's pressure on fentanyl,

00:33:53.120 happy with Trump's efforts on the border.

00:33:56.120 And I ask you this,

00:33:58.540 weren't there,

00:33:59.400 should there have been more Democrats?

00:34:00.960 Democrats saying we should do more on the border.

00:34:04.560 It seems like a complete capitulation.

00:34:07.880 Yeah.

00:34:08.760 But I don't know.

00:34:10.960 He's anti-oligarch,

00:34:12.420 pro-border security,

00:34:14.320 anti-oligarch.

00:34:16.120 Kash Patel,

00:34:17.500 and I don't understand this story at all,

00:34:20.520 but apparently the top 10 FBI's most wanted during the entire Biden era,

00:34:27.780 I think zero were arrested.

00:34:30.960 Zero of the top 10.

00:34:33.080 How many of them do you think that Kash Patel has already caught?

00:34:37.740 Of the top 10 most wanted?

00:34:41.960 Um,

00:34:42.760 all 10.

00:34:45.640 What?

00:34:46.240 What were they doing?

00:34:49.960 It's the top 10.

00:34:52.620 He called all top 10 and what,

00:34:55.060 just weeks.

00:34:57.200 Are you telling me that wasn't possible before?

00:35:01.120 Well,

00:35:01.800 I don't even understand.

00:35:03.260 How is this even remotely possible that Biden's administration got zero and

00:35:10.640 then Kash in a few weeks got all 10?

00:35:13.860 What?

00:35:15.840 Here's the other story that's got me wondering.

00:35:20.380 Gateway Pundit is talking about a,

00:35:22.760 uh,

00:35:23.040 I guess there's an article in Vanity.

00:35:25.280 So not,

00:35:26.580 I wouldn't say the most reliable source,

00:35:28.800 but,

00:35:29.160 um,

00:35:30.160 according to them,

00:35:31.120 the FBI's flagship New York field office has reportedly shifted his focus to a

00:35:37.160 single mission.

00:35:37.940 So they're just going to work on one thing,

00:35:40.300 which is,

00:35:40.900 uh,

00:35:41.680 redacting and reviewing the,

00:35:43.220 uh,

00:35:43.480 Jeffrey Epstein case files for public release.

00:35:46.800 They say there are over a thousand agents,

00:35:49.620 uh,

00:35:50.740 and civilian employees who are sometimes working 12 hour shifts overnight,

00:35:55.700 trying to get this stuff ready to be released.

00:35:59.560 Now,

00:36:00.280 let me ask you this.

00:36:02.880 Why would they apply that much resources?

00:36:07.940 To getting this done because they could have said the only way to get this done

00:36:13.740 is it's going to take us a thousand employees and we're going to have to let

00:36:18.020 our other work,

00:36:18.760 you know,

00:36:20.020 you know,

00:36:20.600 dangle for months.

00:36:22.800 So we don't want to do that.

00:36:24.940 So if you don't mind,

00:36:26.520 we'll give you a,

00:36:27.900 let's say a five month,

00:36:29.260 um,

00:36:30.520 five month deadline.

00:36:32.660 And we'll try to do as much of our other work.

00:36:35.580 That's important too.

00:36:36.620 But you know,

00:36:38.000 we'll put a 200 people on it,

00:36:39.960 not a thousand.

00:36:42.740 Would you have accepted that?

00:36:45.080 We would have had questions,

00:36:46.500 but if it got done in five months and then it was actually really released,

00:36:51.160 you would say,

00:36:52.580 all right,

00:36:52.920 I get it.

00:36:53.980 Some things just take a long time,

00:36:55.460 but why would they instead given that cash is very,

00:37:01.760 you know,

00:37:02.580 very,

00:37:02.960 um,

00:37:03.660 mission focused,

00:37:04.740 he got all 10 of the,

00:37:05.780 uh,

00:37:06.240 top 10 most wanted.

00:37:07.960 And why would he put so much resources into doing this as fast as possible?

00:37:15.840 And then,

00:37:16.480 then I'm going to add another factoid.

00:37:19.240 By now,

00:37:22.120 cash Patel and probably Trump know what kind of impact this is going to have.

00:37:29.120 Meaning they know what names are the big ones.

00:37:31.540 They know how bad it is and they know how it will be received by the public.

00:37:36.920 And at the same time that they know what the impact would be and they know what the names are,

00:37:42.160 they've decided to go as fast as possible.

00:37:46.520 What does that tell you?

00:37:49.500 I'll tell you what it tells me.

00:37:51.740 There's nothing in there about Trump that's damaging.

00:37:55.180 Do you agree on that?

00:37:57.500 Now we'd like to think,

00:37:59.360 Oh,

00:37:59.540 but Scott,

00:38:00.180 the FBI is independent.

00:38:02.140 Uh,

00:38:02.720 cash Patel has already,

00:38:03.920 you know,

00:38:04.580 denied the white house,

00:38:06.080 some,

00:38:07.020 some cuts.

00:38:08.140 You know,

00:38:08.600 he said,

00:38:08.920 I'll do the cuts,

00:38:09.820 not you.

00:38:10.600 So he's already shown independence.

00:38:13.620 So he's not being influenced by the government,

00:38:16.320 but he's put a thousand people on it,

00:38:20.760 working 12 hour shifts sometimes.

00:38:24.520 I don't know if you assume that by now they know exactly what the,

00:38:29.380 the bad news is in there.

00:38:31.660 It suggests that this would completely destroy the Democrat party.

00:38:37.920 That's my take.

00:38:39.020 It must be way worse for Democrats than it is for any Republicans.

00:38:46.300 And I think that the reason that they're working so fast is to make sure

00:38:51.420 those people don't leave the country.

00:38:55.440 And they want to,

00:38:56.580 they want to make sure that there's as little time as possible for the,

00:39:00.360 the bad people to make a move.

00:39:02.660 So I don't know,

00:39:08.020 but it sort of suggests that this would be the end of the Democrat party,

00:39:13.320 that,

00:39:14.480 that the news is going to be so bad,

00:39:16.560 just so bad that it changes life in America.

00:39:21.440 It might.

00:39:22.940 That's what the indication is to me.

00:39:24.840 I mean,

00:39:25.180 I'm just reading the tea leaves here,

00:39:26.740 but that's what it feels like.

00:39:27.660 Meanwhile,

00:39:32.680 as you know,

00:39:33.480 Democrat party favorability,

00:39:35.120 according to some new polls,

00:39:36.620 CNN was talking about it is 29%.

00:39:40.300 Now,

00:39:41.780 just put this in perspective.

00:39:44.060 The,

00:39:44.540 I asked perplexity,

00:39:46.400 how many Democrats and how many Republicans are there?

00:39:51.320 Voters are there right now.

00:39:53.300 And if you count the leaners, 0.96

00:39:55.700 the people who reliably vote one way versus the other.

00:39:58.900 So that would include some independents.

00:40:01.740 There would be 49% Democrats in the country and 48% Republicans.

00:40:07.760 Now those are close enough to be identical,

00:40:10.800 right?

00:40:11.240 Cause of errors and stuff.

00:40:12.840 So basically the same number,

00:40:14.600 basically half the country Republican,

00:40:17.380 half Democrat.

00:40:18.740 Now that doesn't mean they're registered that way.

00:40:21.240 It just means they reliably vote in one direction or the other.

00:40:26.020 So if you've got 49% Democrats in the country or Democrat,

00:40:30.860 reliable voters and only 29% favorability,

00:40:35.480 that would suggest that 40% of the people don't like their own party.

00:40:41.740 That doesn't sound survivable.

00:40:44.600 At all politically.

00:40:48.820 But to be fair,

00:40:50.940 even the Republicans have 30% who don't like their party.

00:40:56.600 So,

00:40:57.020 so there's a lot of people who don't like each party,

00:41:00.120 but the difference between 30 and 40% does seem pretty big to me.

00:41:04.820 You know,

00:41:05.360 not just percentage wise,

00:41:06.800 but one of them seems like,

00:41:08.640 you know,

00:41:09.480 business is normal.

00:41:10.400 Everybody complains about everything,

00:41:12.080 including their own party.

00:41:13.340 And the other seems like turn out the lights.

00:41:17.720 I mean,

00:41:18.540 29% favorability when 49% of the country votes that way,

00:41:24.080 or would like to vote that way.

00:41:26.280 And California is looking at a Republican being competitive for governor.

00:41:32.400 Wow.

00:41:35.820 I've got a feeling that reality is starting to make a dent.

00:41:39.280 Because a lot of politics is not based on reality.

00:41:43.140 It's based on theater.

00:41:44.320 And once people realize that the Democrats are,

00:41:47.760 and always have been since the days of John Wilkes Booth,

00:41:51.200 who was literally an actor,

00:41:53.040 once they realize that the Democrats are a theater group who pretend what's

00:41:59.060 important for power,

00:42:00.880 and they're not at all about fixing anything.

00:42:03.500 You know,

00:42:04.600 that book abundance that we keep talking about as recline and Derek Thompson's

00:42:09.080 book,

00:42:09.300 it's talking about how the Democrats have to stop being the ones who brag about

00:42:16.140 getting stuff funded when nothing happens like charging stations and,

00:42:21.760 you know,

00:42:22.480 high speed rail in California and internet to remote areas.

00:42:27.620 These are all areas where the Democrats,

00:42:29.880 they took a victory lap for getting it funded.

00:42:32.300 And then nothing happened.

00:42:36.060 And so even Democrats are saying,

00:42:37.740 you can't just be a theater group.

00:42:40.520 You can't just pretend you did something.

00:42:42.960 You actually have to do things.

00:42:45.480 And I don't even think that message is taking,

00:42:47.760 taking a hold of the Democrats.

00:42:50.020 I think the Democrats by inertia,

00:42:53.840 by whatever reason are absolutely firmly entrenched,

00:42:59.260 entrenched,

00:43:00.340 entrenched in the idea,

00:43:02.300 that messaging is what matters.

00:43:05.560 Do you know what that means?

00:43:07.640 Theater.

00:43:09.220 Yeah.

00:43:09.840 The theater.

00:43:10.860 Now,

00:43:11.320 the thing that Trump has that they don't quite understand is he has a full

00:43:16.060 talent stack.

00:43:17.420 So he can go full theater and run a rally and entertain people and say things

00:43:22.260 that don't pass the fact checking full theater,

00:43:24.920 but it's sitting on top of real accomplishments,

00:43:30.260 especially in his first term and clearly in the second term,

00:43:33.780 where even the other side can say,

00:43:36.380 you're,

00:43:38.260 you're really good at theater,

00:43:40.180 like really good,

00:43:41.540 like better than anybody's ever been.

00:43:43.580 Nobody's ever been better at theater than you are,

00:43:45.720 but you're also really good at making things happen in the real world.

00:43:52.980 Once the Democrats figure that out,

00:43:55.940 that they've only been,

00:43:57.060 they've only been involved with the theater only,

00:44:00.160 no talent stack.

00:44:01.760 It's going to be hard for them to keep any kind of a ruling majority for

00:44:07.760 federal stuff.

00:44:08.820 I think they'll still rule in the,

00:44:10.880 you know,

00:44:11.540 the cities,

00:44:12.320 et cetera,

00:44:12.860 but I don't know.

00:44:15.540 They seem doomed to me.

00:44:17.420 Of course,

00:44:18.180 it would only take one good federal,

00:44:20.080 you know,

00:44:21.000 a candidate to change everything,

00:44:22.320 but I don't see that person happening.

00:44:24.220 Ontario,

00:44:25.400 the wait is over.

00:44:26.900 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.

00:44:29.740 Golden Nugget online casino is live,

00:44:32.020 bringing Vegas style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.

00:44:37.360 Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting,

00:44:39.720 signing up is fast and simple.

00:44:41.800 And in just a few clicks,

00:44:43.100 you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top tier table games.

00:44:47.840 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment

00:44:53.460 into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget online casino.

00:44:57.520 Take a spin on the slots,

00:44:58.880 challenge yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action.

00:45:04.000 All from the comfort of your own devices.

00:45:06.220 Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget online casino.

00:45:11.520 Gambling problem?

00:45:12.420 Call Connex Ontario 1-866-531-2600.

00:45:16.400 19 and over.

00:45:17.640 Physically present in Ontario.

00:45:19.020 Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:45:20.620 See golden nugget casino.com for details.

00:45:22.940 Please play responsibly.

00:45:24.980 General Flynn has made an appeal to Elon Musk on X.

00:45:29.680 I'll just read it.

00:45:30.640 He says,

00:45:31.140 please,

00:45:32.000 in the capitals,

00:45:33.200 pull the thread on one of these all the way to the end.

00:45:36.200 One of these being,

00:45:37.080 you know,

00:45:37.840 the doge discoveries about bad funding behavior.

00:45:42.680 He says,

00:45:43.400 pull the thread on these all the way to the end to show who is actually receiving the money.

00:45:47.940 I'd like to know,

00:45:49.360 and millions of other Americans would like to know.

00:45:51.620 True.

00:45:52.760 We deserve to see who the hell is ripping us off.

00:45:57.680 You are correct,

00:45:58.620 General.

00:45:59.780 Who is benefiting from this corruption?

00:46:02.580 We the people sincerely appreciate you and the entire doge team exposing them.

00:46:07.280 But the more important question that is clearly bubbling up across our beautiful country is,

00:46:11.740 will anyone ever be held accountable?

00:46:14.640 Help us out here.

00:46:15.940 Thank you.

00:46:17.800 Now,

00:46:18.500 I fully embrace and agree with that.

00:46:21.120 However,

00:46:22.000 I would bet that the recipients don't have any crime to answer to.

00:46:28.300 I feel like the system was just built so that they could easily satisfy the,

00:46:35.440 let's say,

00:46:36.160 the letter of the law while still being completely criminal in intent.

00:46:40.940 For example,

00:46:42.500 if somebody hired a million dollar a year consultant who happened to be their own spouse, 0.62

00:46:50.460 and that person didn't do much at all,

00:46:53.680 is that illegal?

00:46:54.900 I don't think it is.

00:46:58.540 It would be criminal in intent and criminal in outcome,

00:47:04.720 you know,

00:47:05.020 in terms of criminal-ish.

00:47:07.220 But I don't think it would be technically illegal.

00:47:10.400 And to me,

00:47:10.940 that's what all of this looks like.

00:47:12.800 It all looks like this thin veneer of,

00:47:16.320 well,

00:47:17.360 you know,

00:47:17.900 we gave some of it to battle aides in Africa.

00:47:22.300 Well,

00:47:22.780 how much?

00:47:23.600 Well,

00:47:24.700 5%.

00:47:25.700 But where did the rest of it go?

00:47:27.840 Well,

00:47:28.180 there's a lot of administrative overhead to get money to Africa.

00:47:31.560 I mean,

00:47:31.760 it's not easy.

00:47:33.580 And,

00:47:33.940 and it would just look like normal incompetence and normal bad behavior,

00:47:40.060 but not exactly illegal.

00:47:43.280 But I'm in 100% agreement with General Flynn that we should,

00:47:47.900 we should know who it is because if it turns out that 80% of it is going

00:47:53.320 to spouses of Democrat leaders or something like that,

00:47:58.540 I'm not,

00:47:59.000 I'm not assuming that that's going to be the actual outcome,

00:48:01.860 but I think it would tell us a lot.

00:48:05.580 Now,

00:48:06.120 I don't think that Doge is necessarily tasked with that.

00:48:11.060 So I don't know if that's in their domain.

00:48:13.100 If it's not in their domain,

00:48:14.600 I don't know if I'd put it there.

00:48:15.780 Because they have enough to do.

00:48:18.620 You don't want Doge to be like a legal arm of the government.

00:48:23.640 You want them to be cost cutting fraud and abuse.

00:48:26.580 And if they stick to that,

00:48:28.180 maybe their credibility is the best,

00:48:30.400 but somehow,

00:48:31.940 whether it's Doge or somebody else,

00:48:35.200 wouldn't you like to know who's spending on your money?

00:48:38.440 Well,

00:48:40.880 over in Great Britain,

00:48:43.140 you know,

00:48:44.500 they have this Prime Minister,

00:48:46.260 Keir Starmer,

00:48:47.960 who,

00:48:48.800 I don't pay much attention to British politics,

00:48:51.480 but this caught my eye.

00:48:54.420 Apparently,

00:48:55.220 you know,

00:48:55.620 Starmer said that

00:48:57.440 Great Britain might be willing,

00:49:00.020 or would be willing,

00:49:01.020 to put boots on the ground

00:49:03.160 to be a peacekeeping force in Ukraine if necessary.

00:49:07.560 And his own military

00:49:09.100 apparently is saying,

00:49:11.120 you know,

00:49:11.360 you really should have talked to us 0.99

00:49:12.460 because that's bad shit crazy. 0.97

00:49:13.760 So it sounds like the military was not advised 0.98

00:49:19.520 or did not advise

00:49:21.960 on the idea of putting boots on the ground in Ukraine.

00:49:24.980 Now,

00:49:25.520 of course,

00:49:26.300 the military is not in charge of that decision.

00:49:29.140 So if the leader wants to say it

00:49:31.260 and the leader wants to do it,

00:49:32.520 I believe he would have that authority.

00:49:34.560 But the military dismissed it as,

00:49:37.260 quote,

00:49:37.600 political theater.

00:49:41.120 So

00:49:41.600 they've got a left-leaning

00:49:44.500 liberal leader

00:49:46.960 who their own military says

00:49:49.460 is involved in political theater.

00:49:52.560 Huh.

00:49:53.660 There it is.

00:49:55.620 Theatrical.

00:49:56.880 I remember when I first heard it,

00:49:59.080 I thought,

00:49:59.540 really?

00:50:00.620 You think the country of Great Britain

00:50:02.880 is going to be all in

00:50:04.900 on boots on the ground in Ukraine?

00:50:07.140 Really?

00:50:08.200 You think that that's a survivable

00:50:10.460 idea in terms of politically survivable?

00:50:14.380 Probably not.

00:50:16.000 Probably not.

00:50:16.760 It looks like it was just theater,

00:50:18.480 which, once again,

00:50:20.180 we see the pattern.

00:50:22.040 But here's a related topic.

00:50:26.280 And by the way,

00:50:27.280 the funny thing about Starmer

00:50:28.760 is that although he would be

00:50:30.880 the liberal leader,

00:50:32.600 he seemed really very pro-Trump

00:50:36.960 because he was one of the first ones

00:50:39.620 to come over when Trump got elected.

00:50:42.260 And putting boots on the ground

00:50:44.560 in Ukraine sounds

00:50:45.760 pretty darn war-like.

00:50:49.260 So he's an interesting character.

00:50:51.400 We'll keep an eye on him.

00:50:52.280 So according to TVP World,

00:50:56.600 I've never heard of them,

00:50:57.640 but they say that China

00:50:59.420 is thinking about putting

00:51:00.940 peacekeeping forces

00:51:02.480 in Ukraine.

00:51:05.180 I guess that's German media

00:51:06.700 says that.

00:51:08.340 Now,

00:51:09.200 they've only asked about it.

00:51:11.080 So Europe,

00:51:12.060 as you know,

00:51:12.620 Europe is considering the idea

00:51:14.020 of maybe some kind of

00:51:15.520 UN peacekeeping force

00:51:17.300 or a European peacekeeping force.

00:51:20.240 And, of course,

00:51:21.180 Putin is all

00:51:22.460 completely no on that.

00:51:24.120 No, no, no, no, no,

00:51:25.860 and big no.

00:51:27.040 And also capital no

00:51:28.180 and all caps no.

00:51:30.840 But they're still talking about it.

00:51:33.660 Now,

00:51:34.220 China has never been considered

00:51:35.620 a potential force

00:51:37.300 to have boots on the ground.

00:51:39.420 But let me just

00:51:40.980 talk about that

00:51:43.280 for a second.

00:51:44.640 Your first impression

00:51:45.840 to China putting boots

00:51:47.900 on the ground

00:51:48.520 as a peacekeeping force

00:51:50.040 in Ukraine

00:51:51.080 would be what?

00:51:52.720 Crazy, right?

00:51:54.100 Just insane. 0.96

00:51:55.200 You don't want China 1.00

00:51:56.180 to get a foothold

00:51:58.020 in Ukraine.

00:52:00.060 And also,

00:52:00.920 China is 0.85

00:52:01.620 considered to be

00:52:02.980 pro-Russia.

00:52:04.680 So maybe they wouldn't

00:52:05.980 even do the job

00:52:07.140 they were sent there.

00:52:07.920 Maybe they'd be like

00:52:09.580 agents working against

00:52:10.980 peace

00:52:11.900 so that Putin

00:52:12.900 can do what he needs to do

00:52:14.160 and they'll just

00:52:14.640 get out of the way. 0.53

00:52:15.840 So your suspicions

00:52:17.780 and the risk of it

00:52:19.440 seem sky high, right?

00:52:22.740 Let me give you

00:52:23.680 the alternate argument.

00:52:25.640 What does China want? 0.99

00:52:28.420 Because China 0.94

00:52:29.440 is very predictable

00:52:31.300 in pursuing

00:52:32.720 what's good for China.

00:52:34.540 If you could predict

00:52:35.920 one thing about China,

00:52:37.080 it's like,

00:52:37.480 okay,

00:52:38.040 what's good for China? 0.93

00:52:39.260 That's what they'll do.

00:52:40.880 And that's not wrong.

00:52:42.900 I mean,

00:52:43.120 even,

00:52:43.380 I think even Trump

00:52:44.380 would say,

00:52:44.920 yeah,

00:52:45.180 that's why

00:52:46.280 Xi is a strong leader.

00:52:48.000 He's doing what's good

00:52:49.140 for China.

00:52:50.120 And he should.

00:52:51.980 So,

00:52:52.540 what's good for China? 0.93

00:52:54.320 Is it more war?

00:52:56.640 Is China better off 1.00

00:52:58.040 if Putin

00:52:58.660 takes the rest

00:52:59.540 of Ukraine

00:53:00.120 with all the risks

00:53:01.120 that come with that?

00:53:03.040 Nope.

00:53:04.240 China is better off 1.00

00:53:05.680 if everybody else

00:53:06.540 just stops fighting.

00:53:07.520 because they want markets.

00:53:09.660 They want Russia 0.98

00:53:11.200 to do well

00:53:12.040 so they can,

00:53:13.140 you know,

00:53:13.360 make more oil

00:53:14.220 that they can buy.

00:53:15.400 They want to do trade

00:53:17.020 with them.

00:53:17.840 They probably want

00:53:18.740 some of the resources

00:53:19.660 that come out of Ukraine.

00:53:21.160 They might need

00:53:21.860 some food,

00:53:23.380 maybe some wheat.

00:53:24.260 I don't know

00:53:24.580 if they currently

00:53:25.480 consume it or not.

00:53:27.080 But China

00:53:27.880 is never in favor

00:53:28.940 of other countries

00:53:29.980 being at war.

00:53:31.960 So,

00:53:32.540 the weird thing

00:53:33.260 about this is

00:53:34.140 this might be

00:53:35.380 the best idea

00:53:36.140 I've heard.

00:53:38.340 Now,

00:53:38.900 I'm not blind

00:53:39.760 to the fact

00:53:40.520 that you can't

00:53:41.500 trust anybody.

00:53:42.680 I'm not blind

00:53:43.680 to the fact

00:53:44.260 that China 0.93

00:53:44.840 and Putin

00:53:46.160 are seemingly

00:53:47.360 a little bit close.

00:53:49.460 Although,

00:53:50.160 realistically,

00:53:50.820 I think there's

00:53:51.360 got to be

00:53:51.700 some friction there.

00:53:52.700 We just don't

00:53:53.140 hear about it.

00:53:55.720 They are the one,

00:53:56.980 they are the one entity

00:53:58.260 that,

00:53:59.800 in my opinion,

00:54:01.480 purely want peace.

00:54:04.180 And I'm not sure

00:54:05.160 about Europe.

00:54:06.480 Europe seems

00:54:07.060 to want to keep fighting

00:54:07.920 and Putin seems

00:54:09.200 to want to keep fighting.

00:54:10.860 But China?

00:54:12.680 China definitely

00:54:14.000 doesn't want

00:54:14.560 more fighting.

00:54:15.720 There's not

00:54:16.140 the slightest chance

00:54:17.000 that they want

00:54:17.560 Russia to dissolve 0.63

00:54:19.340 as a country

00:54:20.100 with all their

00:54:20.820 nukes exposed.

00:54:23.060 They don't want

00:54:23.540 a nuclear conflict

00:54:27.200 because nothing

00:54:29.140 good about that.

00:54:30.120 It's not good

00:54:30.640 for markets.

00:54:31.460 It's not good

00:54:31.920 for business.

00:54:32.900 It's not good

00:54:33.460 for surviving.

00:54:34.180 So,

00:54:36.500 whatever happens

00:54:38.180 that works

00:54:38.940 in Ukraine

00:54:39.800 is going to be

00:54:40.500 so far out of the box

00:54:41.980 that you're going

00:54:43.440 to say,

00:54:43.840 whoa,

00:54:44.440 that never occurred

00:54:45.280 to me.

00:54:45.900 This is wonderfully

00:54:47.360 outside the box.

00:54:49.240 I'm not going to say

00:54:50.160 it's a good idea

00:54:51.020 because,

00:54:52.380 you know,

00:54:52.800 maybe smarter people 0.95

00:54:53.860 who can see around

00:54:54.820 corners will say,

00:54:56.160 oh, Scott,

00:54:56.840 you're forgetting

00:54:57.240 about this or that.

00:54:58.200 But if you could

00:54:59.500 make sure that

00:55:00.160 the Chinese presence

00:55:01.380 wasn't so big

00:55:03.180 that they could,

00:55:04.420 you know,

00:55:04.700 somehow militarily

00:55:05.740 dominate Ukraine

00:55:06.820 or something,

00:55:08.360 I don't see this,

00:55:10.520 I don't see any chance

00:55:11.840 that Putin would

00:55:13.220 bomb Chinese troops. 0.64

00:55:17.000 Do you? 0.98

00:55:17.680 I think this might

00:55:20.020 be weirdly

00:55:21.500 one of the better

00:55:22.240 ideas about Ukraine.

00:55:24.620 High risk,

00:55:26.000 but every path

00:55:27.780 is high risk.

00:55:28.920 So if you say

00:55:29.620 that's too risky,

00:55:31.040 you have to compare it

00:55:32.320 to all the other paths

00:55:33.280 which are too risky.

00:55:35.100 So what we're trying

00:55:36.040 to do is find

00:55:36.760 the least of the

00:55:37.920 too risky paths.

00:55:40.400 And it might be

00:55:41.320 the least risky,

00:55:42.540 weirdly.

00:55:44.140 So anyway,

00:55:46.360 and again,

00:55:47.860 the thing that

00:55:48.680 would make it

00:55:49.200 possible

00:55:50.820 is that China

00:55:52.140 is so darn predictable.

00:55:54.240 And I predict

00:55:55.460 that the last thing

00:55:57.260 they want is war.

00:55:58.620 And if they think

00:55:59.360 they're the only thing

00:56:00.120 that could prevent it,

00:56:02.080 I think they'd be in

00:56:03.040 for the right reasons.

00:56:08.240 Thank more Encores

00:56:09.600 when you switch

00:56:10.240 to a Scotiabank

00:56:11.140 banking package.

00:56:13.160 Learn more

00:56:13.540 at scotiabank.com

00:56:14.740 slash banking packages.

00:56:16.460 Conditions apply.

00:56:18.320 Scotiabank.

00:56:18.980 You're richer

00:56:19.440 than you think.

00:56:21.780 Speaking of a Starmer,

00:56:23.420 Just the News

00:56:24.000 is reporting that

00:56:24.980 Starmer wants to do

00:56:26.520 a doge-like thing

00:56:28.160 with the British bureaucracy.

00:56:30.480 Remember I told you

00:56:31.240 he's weirdly

00:56:31.960 Trump-like

00:56:33.260 for somebody

00:56:34.500 who's a liberal?

00:56:35.780 So he wants to do

00:56:36.880 a doge-like thing.

00:56:37.860 And what do you think

00:56:38.500 the locals

00:56:39.280 are saying about that,

00:56:40.360 the anti-Sturmers?

00:56:42.180 Well, they're saying

00:56:42.920 that he wants

00:56:43.560 to take a chainsaw

00:56:44.520 to the...

00:56:45.960 So they're using

00:56:47.200 the chainsaw

00:56:48.100 thing against them.

00:56:49.600 All he wants to do

00:56:50.500 is reduce the bureaucracy.

00:56:52.380 He just wants

00:56:52.880 to save some money

00:56:53.640 for the taxpayers.

00:56:55.340 Oh, you should use 0.99

00:56:56.500 a scalpel

00:56:57.140 instead of a chainsaw.

00:56:58.960 Chainsaw,

00:56:59.520 chainsaw,

00:57:00.000 chainsaw.

00:57:02.060 All right.

00:57:02.760 Well, Mike Benz

00:57:04.920 had a video

00:57:06.640 that I was listening

00:57:07.420 to yesterday

00:57:08.060 that, you know,

00:57:10.500 every time I listen

00:57:11.720 to him,

00:57:12.620 I go away

00:57:13.420 just saying,

00:57:14.240 oh, you know,

00:57:15.940 my whole worldview

00:57:16.840 is altered again.

00:57:20.040 Apparently,

00:57:21.060 the CIA

00:57:21.840 has long had,

00:57:24.400 let's say,

00:57:25.640 a toolkit

00:57:27.040 that included

00:57:29.160 if they couldn't

00:57:30.020 get enough

00:57:30.500 congressional support

00:57:31.720 to do something

00:57:32.460 they wanted to do

00:57:33.280 to another country,

00:57:34.580 let's say Cuba,

00:57:37.040 that one of the ways

00:57:38.120 they would deal

00:57:38.580 with that

00:57:39.020 is to support

00:57:40.300 massive immigration

00:57:41.780 until there were

00:57:43.440 enough concentration

00:57:44.780 of Cubans,

00:57:45.980 let's say,

00:57:46.540 in one place,

00:57:47.680 that they could elect

00:57:48.600 a representative

00:57:50.280 to Congress

00:57:51.380 who could help

00:57:52.560 push the idea

00:57:53.540 of, you know,

00:57:54.560 getting tough

00:57:55.080 with Cuba.

00:57:57.040 And that they

00:57:58.560 may have actually

00:57:59.180 done that.

00:58:00.600 And that another

00:58:01.220 example might be

00:58:02.320 that the CIA

00:58:04.080 wanted to do

00:58:04.760 some things

00:58:05.320 around Somalia,

00:58:06.940 so they somehow

00:58:08.980 may have inspired

00:58:10.360 a bunch of

00:58:11.100 immigration

00:58:11.940 into one part

00:58:13.820 of the world

00:58:14.340 which would elect

00:58:15.380 Ilhan Omar.

00:58:18.340 Is this real?

00:58:20.520 Is the CIA

00:58:21.920 really manipulating

00:58:23.640 the Congress

00:58:24.860 by mass immigration

00:58:27.000 and then concentrating

00:58:28.220 them in one place

00:58:29.320 so they can elect

00:58:30.520 their own

00:58:31.200 congressperson?

00:58:33.040 And then the CIA

00:58:34.180 would back them

00:58:35.080 and, you know,

00:58:35.600 give them enough

00:58:36.240 power and attention

00:58:37.240 that it would be

00:58:39.900 driving the CIA's

00:58:41.400 agenda instead

00:58:42.520 of the American

00:58:43.180 agenda?

00:58:43.620 Is that real?

00:58:46.640 Like, I so want

00:58:47.780 to believe that's

00:58:48.380 not real.

00:58:50.000 But it could be.

00:58:53.500 It certainly could be.

00:58:54.660 It would explain

00:58:55.620 a lot.

00:58:58.560 Anyway,

00:58:59.360 apparently the

00:59:00.480 Department of

00:59:01.080 Education,

00:59:01.840 which we think

00:59:02.840 is going to go

00:59:03.440 away,

00:59:05.200 has spent

00:59:05.740 hundreds of

00:59:06.480 millions of

00:59:07.000 dollars,

00:59:07.360 or at least

00:59:07.700 a hundred

00:59:07.980 million,

00:59:09.040 on DEI

00:59:09.920 for grade

00:59:12.400 schools as well

00:59:13.160 as universities.

00:59:14.740 This is according

00:59:15.520 to Just the News.

00:59:16.560 and now that

00:59:19.280 that's banned,

00:59:20.360 we're wondering

00:59:21.000 if they're going

00:59:21.500 to figure out

00:59:22.020 some clever way

00:59:22.840 to do it

00:59:23.380 or if they're

00:59:24.180 going to stop

00:59:24.640 doing it.

00:59:25.600 But can you

00:59:26.280 even imagine

00:59:26.820 that?

00:59:27.960 That the

00:59:28.520 Department of

00:59:30.580 Education was

00:59:31.640 going to put

00:59:32.000 a hundred million

00:59:32.680 dollars into

00:59:33.980 DEI to make

00:59:35.820 the world a

00:59:36.380 worse place?

00:59:38.280 Unbelievable.

00:59:39.800 So that

00:59:40.380 certainly makes it

00:59:41.280 easy to get rid

00:59:42.000 of the Department

00:59:42.700 of Education.

00:59:43.320 And my

00:59:45.500 last two

00:59:46.880 stories are

00:59:47.540 technology.

00:59:48.920 So the New

00:59:49.620 York Police

00:59:50.620 Department is

00:59:51.160 sending drones

00:59:52.280 wherever there's

00:59:53.720 a 911 call.

00:59:55.480 So Futurism

00:59:56.560 Publication is

00:59:57.600 writing about

00:59:58.060 this.

00:59:58.680 And what

01:00:01.920 will happen

01:00:02.320 is I guess

01:00:02.940 if there's

01:00:03.340 a 911 call

01:00:04.300 it automatically

01:00:05.220 will,

01:00:06.180 or somewhat

01:00:07.100 automatically,

01:00:08.380 they'll quickly

01:00:09.300 dispatch a

01:00:10.540 drone that

01:00:11.860 will have

01:00:12.300 high-end

01:00:13.200 surveillance so

01:00:14.120 it can get

01:00:14.560 license plates

01:00:15.320 and give

01:00:15.960 faces and

01:00:16.820 spot people.

01:00:19.280 I don't know

01:00:20.120 what percentage

01:00:20.700 of 911 calls

01:00:21.780 are outdoors

01:00:22.340 or maybe

01:00:24.060 something starts

01:00:25.320 indoors and

01:00:26.000 somebody escapes

01:00:26.740 outdoors.

01:00:27.780 But I'm

01:00:29.460 surprised that

01:00:30.120 wasn't already

01:00:30.680 a thing.

01:00:33.100 To me,

01:00:33.920 this seems like

01:00:34.540 the most

01:00:35.020 inevitable thing

01:00:36.620 you could ever

01:00:37.100 have.

01:00:37.880 Don't you

01:00:38.280 think that

01:00:38.840 10 years from

01:00:39.540 now,

01:00:39.940 every city

01:00:40.540 will be

01:00:40.980 dispatching a

01:00:42.420 drone to

01:00:42.940 a 911 call?

01:00:44.800 I feel like

01:00:45.780 it's just

01:00:46.120 going to

01:00:46.320 happen

01:00:46.520 everywhere and

01:00:47.460 it will be

01:00:47.840 sort of

01:00:48.300 normal.

01:00:50.440 So I'm

01:00:51.160 not going to

01:00:51.520 put a

01:00:51.780 judgment on

01:00:52.340 it whether

01:00:52.600 it's good

01:00:53.000 or bad.

01:00:53.760 It's just

01:00:54.240 inevitable.

01:00:55.960 And then

01:00:56.220 NVIDIA

01:00:56.880 has just said

01:00:58.720 that robotics

01:00:59.300 could become

01:00:59.920 the world's

01:01:00.380 biggest

01:01:00.760 multi-trillion

01:01:01.700 dollar industry.

01:01:03.300 It could

01:01:04.100 if they ever

01:01:05.940 figure out

01:01:06.440 how to make

01:01:06.880 an AI that

01:01:07.560 will really

01:01:08.040 drive a

01:01:08.500 robot,

01:01:09.080 which they

01:01:10.160 haven't done

01:01:10.580 yet.

01:01:12.220 Given the

01:01:14.000 complexity and

01:01:17.180 the improvement

01:01:17.920 in robots,

01:01:19.440 so you've

01:01:20.140 seen lots of

01:01:20.700 robots who

01:01:21.220 have hands

01:01:21.840 that work

01:01:22.360 almost like

01:01:22.880 normal hands

01:01:23.720 and they have

01:01:24.400 full articulation

01:01:25.580 and they have

01:01:26.680 balance and

01:01:27.440 they can do

01:01:27.900 tricks and

01:01:28.620 stuff.

01:01:29.440 So I'm

01:01:30.440 going to say

01:01:30.900 that the

01:01:31.300 robot bodies

01:01:32.180 are now

01:01:33.740 complete.

01:01:34.820 They will

01:01:35.460 keep improving,

01:01:36.340 of course,

01:01:36.920 but they

01:01:37.880 are now

01:01:38.360 complete.

01:01:40.360 In other

01:01:40.660 words, if

01:01:41.160 they had the

01:01:41.620 right AI

01:01:42.600 brains,

01:01:43.660 they're already

01:01:44.620 ready to go.

01:01:47.020 But they're

01:01:48.720 not ready to

01:01:49.340 go.

01:01:50.660 And I'm

01:01:51.340 going to say

01:01:51.680 again, I'm

01:01:52.660 the contrarian

01:01:53.420 here, I

01:01:54.500 don't think

01:01:55.000 there's any

01:01:55.580 AI that can

01:01:56.380 drive a

01:01:56.800 robot.

01:01:57.720 And I don't

01:01:58.500 think that we

01:01:59.120 have even

01:01:59.920 the flavor

01:02:00.840 of AI that

01:02:02.320 no matter how

01:02:02.940 much you tweak

01:02:03.640 it, would

01:02:05.200 make it safe

01:02:05.940 for a robot.

01:02:06.920 I feel like

01:02:08.200 AI will have

01:02:08.880 to be a

01:02:09.280 whole different

01:02:10.220 invention that

01:02:11.220 hasn't happened

01:02:11.820 yet.

01:02:12.740 So maybe

01:02:14.120 it's a year

01:02:14.640 away, but

01:02:17.240 it could be

01:02:17.840 never.

01:02:21.220 I'm not

01:02:21.940 going to

01:02:22.180 predict that,

01:02:23.460 but it

01:02:24.300 could be

01:02:24.760 never.

01:02:26.700 However,

01:02:27.620 since I

01:02:28.060 think it's

01:02:28.460 likely that

01:02:29.200 they will

01:02:29.540 get there,

01:02:30.780 I wondered

01:02:31.460 if there's

01:02:31.860 any kind

01:02:32.200 of robot

01:02:32.760 investment

01:02:33.500 fund.

01:02:34.040 has

01:02:35.140 anybody

01:02:35.460 put

01:02:35.740 together

01:02:36.140 a

01:02:36.660 stock

01:02:37.200 fund,

01:02:37.880 which is

01:02:38.620 a

01:02:38.820 collection

01:02:39.260 of

01:02:39.540 just

01:02:39.740 the

01:02:40.120 best

01:02:40.700 robot

01:02:41.260 making

01:02:41.600 companies,

01:02:42.100 so you

01:02:42.520 don't have

01:02:42.840 to guess

01:02:43.320 a winner,

01:02:44.200 because if

01:02:44.620 any one of

01:02:45.100 them is a

01:02:45.540 winner, it

01:02:46.040 will be

01:02:46.240 a trillion

01:02:46.540 dollar

01:02:46.820 company.

01:02:48.000 So I

01:02:48.620 would

01:02:48.780 definitely

01:02:49.100 put money

01:02:49.700 into a

01:02:50.640 robot

01:02:51.780 fund,

01:02:53.100 because that's

01:02:54.400 diversification.

01:02:55.500 By the way,

01:02:56.420 I don't

01:02:56.820 recommend

01:02:57.340 investments.

01:02:59.780 That's not

01:03:00.180 what I do.

01:03:00.580 the only

01:03:01.560 thing I

01:03:01.920 recommend

01:03:02.320 is

01:03:02.600 diversification.

01:03:04.680 So the

01:03:05.740 best way

01:03:06.160 to diversify

01:03:06.940 is not

01:03:07.480 to invest

01:03:08.140 in one

01:03:08.620 robot

01:03:08.980 company,

01:03:09.780 but to

01:03:10.680 invest in

01:03:11.560 some kind

01:03:12.320 of a

01:03:12.700 collection

01:03:13.620 of them,

01:03:14.400 but also

01:03:15.320 make sure

01:03:15.920 that's not

01:03:16.320 your only

01:03:16.680 investment.

01:03:18.260 So this

01:03:19.080 is how I

01:03:19.800 give you

01:03:21.260 advice that's

01:03:21.980 useful,

01:03:22.680 but it's

01:03:23.320 not investment

01:03:24.020 advice,

01:03:24.920 because 100%

01:03:26.400 of all experts

01:03:27.220 would tell

01:03:27.640 you diversification

01:03:29.500 is really

01:03:30.940 important.

01:03:31.940 So as long

01:03:32.560 as you're

01:03:32.840 doing it

01:03:33.300 with

01:03:33.780 diversification

01:03:34.700 in mind,

01:03:35.600 I don't

01:03:35.960 mind recommending

01:03:36.720 you do it,

01:03:37.620 but I'm not

01:03:38.440 going to

01:03:38.600 recommend a

01:03:39.160 specific company

01:03:40.080 or even a

01:03:40.740 specific fund.

01:03:41.960 I'm just

01:03:42.380 curious if

01:03:42.960 one exists.

01:03:45.200 So there

01:03:45.620 are funds

01:03:46.280 like that

01:03:46.640 for nuclear

01:03:47.200 power.

01:03:49.400 So if you

01:03:50.100 wanted to

01:03:50.380 invest in

01:03:50.840 that,

01:03:51.080 you'd have

01:03:51.320 the option.

01:03:52.360 Again,

01:03:52.720 I don't

01:03:52.980 recommend it.

01:03:53.820 It's just

01:03:54.180 there.

01:03:55.700 All right,

01:03:56.200 ladies and 0.98

01:03:56.740 gentlemen,

01:03:57.300 that's all I've

01:03:57.840 got for you

01:03:58.280 today.

01:03:58.660 I hope

01:03:59.940 that was

01:04:00.420 enough

01:04:01.000 positivity

01:04:01.700 for you.

01:04:02.760 It does

01:04:03.240 look like

01:04:03.840 things are

01:04:05.300 looking pretty

01:04:05.820 good in

01:04:06.320 the Trump

01:04:07.740 world.

01:04:08.300 I'm only

01:04:08.860 worried about

01:04:09.560 whether

01:04:09.860 Doge can 0.98

01:04:10.760 get to the

01:04:11.760 big numbers

01:04:12.300 they need

01:04:12.720 to get

01:04:13.000 to.

01:04:13.740 To me,

01:04:14.380 that's the

01:04:14.840 only thing

01:04:15.500 that looks

01:04:16.760 like a

01:04:17.100 problem,

01:04:17.920 like a

01:04:18.300 big problem.

01:04:19.440 So we'll

01:04:19.820 see.

01:04:20.360 I'll be

01:04:20.760 optimistic

01:04:21.240 about that

01:04:21.780 as well.

01:04:23.380 All right,

01:04:23.840 I'm going

01:04:24.040 to talk to

01:04:24.480 the local

01:04:25.720 subscribers

01:04:26.520 privately.

01:04:27.240 The rest

01:04:28.280 of you,

01:04:28.740 thanks for

01:04:29.120 joining.

01:04:29.520 I'll see

01:04:29.800 you tomorrow,

01:04:30.520 same time,

01:04:31.100 same place,

01:04:31.600 every day

01:04:32.080 for X and

01:04:33.880 Rumble and

01:04:34.880 YouTube.

01:04:36.740 And 30

01:04:38.040 seconds from

01:04:38.680 now,

01:04:39.040 we'll be

01:04:39.420 private.

01:04:40.180 with.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 24, 2025

Episode 2788 CWSA 03⧸24⧸25

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript