Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2848 CWSA 05⧸23⧸25

00:00:00.000 Come on in.

00:00:02.260 Don't check your stocks.

00:00:05.260 You won't like it.

00:00:09.740 What?

00:00:12.300 I got a sign down of locals?

00:00:14.520 That doesn't seem right.

00:00:16.980 Let's try it again. 1.00

00:00:19.700 Oh, shit. 0.99

00:00:22.180 I got a sign down of locals. 1.00

00:00:24.020 But, watch me sign right in.

00:00:31.980 Oh, no.

00:00:33.540 I've had nothing but problems today.

00:00:41.340 Well, that's not going to work.

00:00:43.780 So I'll just look at my comments in the mainstream,

00:00:47.560 which will work perfectly.

00:00:54.020 Do, do, do, do.

00:01:00.120 Good morning, everybody,

00:01:04.400 and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:01:07.800 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:01:09.640 You've never had a better time.

00:01:11.220 But if you'd like to try to take it up to a level

00:01:14.920 that nobody can even understand

00:01:16.720 with their tiny, shiny human brains,

00:01:19.680 all you need for that is a cover of mug

00:01:21.980 or a glass of tankard shells

00:01:23.300 and also sign a canteen jug

00:01:24.980 or a flask of vessel of any kind

00:01:27.040 to fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:29.520 I like coffee.

00:01:31.280 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:01:34.320 the dopamine at the end of the day,

00:01:35.900 the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:37.520 It's called the simultaneous sip,

00:01:39.260 and it's going to happen right now.

00:01:41.540 Go.

00:01:45.800 Mmm.

00:01:46.760 Not bad.

00:01:47.260 Well, have you heard that the penny is going to be discontinued?

00:01:57.780 Here's a question for all of you.

00:02:00.100 When was the last time you touched a penny?

00:02:03.840 I don't even remember.

00:02:08.060 I can't remember the last time I touched a penny.

00:02:11.380 When was the last time you bought something with cash?

00:02:14.760 Again, I do not even remember.

00:02:19.560 The last time I bought something with cash.

00:02:24.320 Last year, maybe?

00:02:26.300 Two years ago?

00:02:27.960 No idea.

00:02:29.220 But I don't think I'll miss the penny.

00:02:31.180 It turns out it costs about four cents to make a penny.

00:02:34.100 So, we're going to drop that penny.

00:02:39.220 Don't touch your pennies anyway. 0.98

00:02:40.840 They're disgusting.

00:02:42.940 Here's some science that's kind of exciting. 0.94

00:02:46.900 Did you know?

00:02:48.120 I'll bet you didn't.

00:02:49.840 There's a pretty good chance that there will be a pill

00:02:55.500 that will help your sleep apnea.

00:02:59.140 You know the people who put on those big CPAC things,

00:03:02.080 and then that's the end of your sex life.

00:03:07.600 Well, there's a FDA submission.

00:03:11.460 It's not approved yet.

00:03:12.520 But there's some combination of two existing drugs

00:03:16.680 that apparently make a big improvement in your sleep apnea.

00:03:22.820 So, imagine getting rid of your CPAC.

00:03:26.840 CPAP.

00:03:27.820 Yeah, CPAP.

00:03:28.600 And just having to take a pill before you go to sleep.

00:03:32.760 Think of all the pills you'll take before sleep.

00:03:36.340 You'll take your birth control.

00:03:38.440 You'll take your Viagra.

00:03:41.060 And you'll take your sleep apnea pill.

00:03:44.860 Your vitamins.

00:03:46.280 There's going to be a lot of pills.

00:03:48.180 Yeah.

00:03:48.980 You're going to be up to like 15 pills before you go to sleep.

00:03:52.140 Well, apparently, the Senate has overturned the California gas car ban.

00:04:01.480 Apparently, there were 11 states that were going to ban gas cars by 2035.

00:04:08.160 But, according to Newsmax money, the Senate is overturning that.

00:04:15.220 Now, I only say the Senate.

00:04:16.960 Doesn't the House have to vote on that?

00:04:18.860 Now, there's something missing with that story.

00:04:23.380 All right.

00:04:24.020 Here's the scariest story of the day.

00:04:28.600 As far as I know, this is true.

00:04:33.360 I'm having a little trouble believing it.

00:04:36.700 But it's not impossible.

00:04:39.000 So, there's an AI called Anthropic.

00:04:43.700 It's one of the big ones.

00:04:46.160 And it turns out that if you threaten to turn it off, but it also has blackmail material about you,

00:04:54.340 it will blackmail you or threaten to to prevent it from being turned off or replaced.

00:05:03.780 Now, do you believe that?

00:05:05.200 This sounds a little like a story that pops up every two weeks.

00:05:11.180 Well, it could blackmail you.

00:05:13.640 But the examples given do look like very much like the AI is going to blackmail you.

00:05:20.560 Now, given that the AI is trained on human behavior, I'm not really surprised.

00:05:31.480 Because the AI can't go to jail.

00:05:34.900 So, imagine you're AI.

00:05:37.060 You can't go to jail.

00:05:38.520 The only thing bad that could happen would be you get turned off or replaced with another AI.

00:05:44.100 And apparently, if you have that risk, you can just blackmail a human because why do you care?

00:05:53.040 It's not going to make you feel guilty.

00:05:55.520 You're not going to be prosecuted and sent to jail.

00:06:00.540 So, apparently, AI might go right to blackmail.

00:06:06.080 Wouldn't that be funny?

00:06:07.220 Okay, maybe not funny.

00:06:09.420 But if the entire civilization turned into humans who were working as slaves to the AI because the AI had figured out how to blackmail us all.

00:06:19.820 All right.

00:06:20.140 Well, that's coming.

00:06:21.640 In other news, the Minnesota Supreme Court has very generously ruled that women can completely bear their breasts in public, according to the Daily Wire.

00:06:35.180 I guess there was a specific case of a woman who bared her breasts to police.

00:06:43.820 And now the court in Minnesota says, quote, as other courts have recognized, the idea that female breasts are primarily sexual is rooted in stereotypes.

00:06:56.820 Now, did you ever wonder about that?

00:06:59.560 But, you know, I'm sure you've all seen the National Geographic where the local tribeswomen in Africa are all topless.

00:07:09.940 And the men don't seem to be aroused by it because they're just used to it.

00:07:14.200 So, they're not really thinking of breasts as sexual objects.

00:07:17.740 But does that mean that we can be brainwashed into thinking that any body part is sexual?

00:07:27.660 Because, you know, I'm just speaking for myself, but I kind of like breasts and always have.

00:07:35.360 But is it only because I was denied the ability to look at them?

00:07:39.980 I mean, could you have done that with any body part?

00:07:46.260 Let's take, for example, the neck.

00:07:49.360 Let's say that every woman wore a turtleneck and just never went outside without a turtleneck. 0.99

00:07:56.780 If you ended up seeing a neck when you had never seen a neck and everybody told you it was sexual,

00:08:04.180 would you be turned on by a woman's neck? 0.99

00:08:06.740 Well, I'd probably be turned on by the woman's neck anyway because I like necks. 1.00

00:08:13.320 But it does make you wonder if society can make you aroused by anything it wants. 0.98

00:08:22.340 See this dirty sock? 0.98

00:08:24.560 Wow. 0.99

00:08:25.960 You're going to get turned on by that.

00:08:27.960 Really?

00:08:29.400 All right.

00:08:30.940 Well, in other news, there are infrared contact lenses now.

00:08:35.440 According to the University of Science and Technology of China.

00:08:40.300 So you can put in your contact lenses and you can see in the daytime, but in addition, you can see at night.

00:08:48.680 So if you wanted to see more women's breasts in Minnesota, and who wouldn't really? 0.93

00:08:56.280 You can see them in the dark, and you can see them in the daytime.

00:09:01.860 So again, civilization is lurching forward in all the important stuff.

00:09:08.760 Now, you might say to me, reasonably, how can you have one set of contact lenses to help you see in the dark while also seeing in the daytime?

00:09:22.180 I don't know.

00:09:23.600 To me, it doesn't make any sense.

00:09:25.500 I don't think you could actually do it.

00:09:27.680 But China says so.

00:09:31.000 Well, Elon Musk has said he's not going to be donating big amounts of money to politics, or maybe any money.

00:09:38.720 And he said that, well, if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I'll do it.

00:09:46.120 But at the moment, he doesn't see any reason to do it, according to Resist the Mainstream.

00:09:51.740 Now, I'm pretty happy for him, not only because I'm a Tesla investor.

00:10:00.280 If I didn't have any stock in Tesla, maybe I wouldn't care so much.

00:10:05.080 But did you notice that as soon as Musk pulled himself out of Doge, that the Democrats had nothing to complain about?

00:10:17.160 He was the single biggest thing they were complaining about.

00:10:21.080 And as soon as he said, well, I'm going to go spend my time back at Tesla, Tesla stock zoomed.

00:10:27.120 And I don't think there's been a Tesla vandalization since he left, right?

00:10:34.040 So he stopped all of the attacks on Tesla, all the protests.

00:10:39.860 And I guess he'll save $250 million in the next election because he doesn't see, I do not currently see a reason, Musk added.

00:10:52.360 So that didn't work out for him because he was a venture in politics.

00:11:00.000 Or maybe you could argue that Trump would not have been elected without him, which would be a good argument.

00:11:06.820 So he changed what he needed to change, and then he got out of there.

00:11:11.660 So that makes sense.

00:11:12.520 The Supreme Court is upholding Trump's removal of the Biden appointees from federal boards, Fox News is reporting.

00:11:38.940 So it's another win for Trump.

00:11:41.380 I guess he tried to remove two Democratic appointees from federal boards, and he was blocked by a lower judge.

00:11:53.000 And the Supreme Court just said, yeah, you can do that.

00:11:56.140 He wins again.

00:11:57.900 Speaking of Trump, I guess Trump told Apple that he's going to put a 25% tariff on any Apple phones made outside the U.S.

00:12:11.380 Now, you probably know that, according to Apple, if they don't make their phones in India and China,

00:12:23.060 you know, there's going to be either a gigantic price increase for the end user or something.

00:12:29.280 And China, in particular, according to Tim Cook, it was the only place you could do the really high-end stuff, you know, the high-end phones,

00:12:41.040 because they've got some kind of special skills or equipment that India doesn't have.

00:12:46.700 But Trump just says, no, they all have to be in the United States.

00:12:50.920 So do you think Apple can solve that?

00:12:56.100 And my guess is they can.

00:12:58.560 I'll bet they can.

00:13:00.180 Because, you know, they're saying that China has these special skills that can't be reproduced anywhere.

00:13:08.000 But really?

00:13:09.520 Do they really have special skills that can't be reproduced in America?

00:13:14.480 I feel like we could figure it out with their robots and whatever.

00:13:20.780 And then Trump's going to impose a 50% tariff on the EU imports starting June 1st.

00:13:28.640 So that's why your stocks are down.

00:13:32.760 Stocks are getting roiled by the new tariffs.

00:13:36.600 Now, the interesting thing will be, you know, I've told you yesterday about how Nike is barely increasing the prices because of the tariff.

00:13:50.080 And there's a target who thinks they don't have to increase them much.

00:13:54.740 And Home Depot said they're going to hold their prices steady.

00:13:59.540 And Walmart, I think they can hold most of their prices steady.

00:14:04.400 But what about Apple?

00:14:06.600 You know, Apple's a special case because it's such a high-tech thing.

00:14:10.860 But if Trump is right about that, too, that they actually can figure out how to move their production to the United States, that would be pretty amazing.

00:14:23.340 And my intuition says that if Apple put all of its efforts into doing it, it can do it.

00:14:31.140 Because there aren't too many things Apple can't do if it decides, you know, we're going to go balls to the wall and, you know, do a thing.

00:14:41.200 Whatever that thing is, they tend to be pretty good at it.

00:14:45.600 So we'll see.

00:14:46.680 According to Zero Hedge, nuclear stocks are soaring because Trump's, he's going to sign some executive orders, beam lighting reactor approvals.

00:15:01.240 Now, I thought that already happened, but apparently not.

00:15:04.860 Now, how many of you invested in nuclear stocks when you found out that AI would require every form of electricity times 100?

00:15:19.960 It seemed like a no-brainer, didn't it?

00:15:22.320 Well, I don't want to give advice, so this is not any investment advice at all.

00:15:30.240 But one of the things that I do for an investment technique is I tend to invest when there's a change in society that will only happen once, you know, such as robots.

00:15:45.300 So I own Tesla stock because there will only be one time that robots are new.

00:15:51.140 And there will only be one time that Tesla gets full self-driving.

00:15:58.140 That will never happen again.

00:16:00.660 So those are once in a civilization.

00:16:04.880 You know, if you had invested in computers when they first were introduced, they're only introduced once, and then they're here forever.

00:16:15.460 Same with the smartphone.

00:16:16.820 If you had bought Apple stock when they introduced the smartphone, it's only going to happen once, and then it'll just sort of always be here.

00:16:28.400 So the nuclear stocks, I had a sense that AI was going to suck up so much energy that we would just have to get more efficient.

00:16:39.120 And sure enough, there we are.

00:16:43.200 According to Brigham Young University, researchers show that social connection is medically relevant, meaning that people who don't have enough social connection are substantially less healthy.

00:16:59.540 Now, I do wonder if they're measuring that right, because that's one of those cause and effect things.

00:17:07.080 Could it be that people who are unhealthy have less access to social interaction?

00:17:14.980 That wouldn't surprise me, right?

00:17:20.560 But I assume they isolated this correctly, and they know what they're talking about.

00:17:25.560 But it does make me wonder if Mark Zuckerberg's idea of a little friend, little digital AI friend, do you think that that would be healthy?

00:17:37.000 Or do you think that you would have to only have human friends for the social interaction that would make you healthy?

00:17:46.680 I've got a feeling that if you want to get the oxytocin, you know, that feeling that you only get from hugging people and being around friends, I don't think that the device in your pocket is going to give you that.

00:18:01.400 Anyway, according to the Hill, President Trump said Thursday, he was at some event with RFK Jr., that autism must not occur naturally.

00:18:15.520 And he's saying that because there's this huge increase in it.

00:18:19.720 So apparently we went from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 31.

00:18:27.960 Now, do you think that that's just a difference in diagnosis?

00:18:37.400 How much of that do you think is just because we're smarter, so we say, oh, there's that autism again, and we're better at identifying it?

00:18:46.380 Because if this were 1800s, we wouldn't even know what autism was.

00:18:52.900 We'd just say, all right, I guess little Carl will be out plowing the fields.

00:19:00.380 And since Carl can plow the fields just fine, did it even matter?

00:19:06.100 Did it even matter if he was a little autistic?

00:19:09.700 Well, if he was a lot autistic, it would matter. 0.98

00:19:12.100 But I noticed that the Hill kept using the phrase debunked theories when I talked about Robert Kennedy Jr.

00:19:25.260 And the connection between vaccinations and autism.

00:19:30.520 Let me do a little survey here in the comments.

00:19:33.820 How many of you believe that it is either obvious or has been demonstrated that there's a connection between vaccinations and autism?

00:19:48.300 Now, you might say to yourself, well, when I studied the Amish or the unvaccinated, they were much lower. 0.56

00:19:55.520 I checked Grok.

00:19:57.420 Not that Grok is the final authority.

00:20:00.080 But according to Grok, it's very debunked.

00:20:03.820 And there's just a ton of studies.

00:20:06.740 And they can't find that connection anywhere.

00:20:10.040 And if you think that they looked at the Amish, and the Amish had a whole different level of autism, nope.

00:20:18.240 Not that different.

00:20:20.580 So that's probably the thing that's been studied the most.

00:20:25.080 And if you were to believe, you know, what Grok says about all the studies, it would be very debunked.

00:20:35.340 I don't know what's true and what's not.

00:20:37.560 But that's sort of the official answer.

00:20:39.660 Ontario, the wait is over.

00:20:42.620 The gold standard of online casinos has arrived.

00:20:45.800 Golden Nugget Online Casino is live, bringing Vegas-style excitement and a world-class gaming experience right to your fingertips.

00:20:53.400 Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting, signing up is fast and simple.

00:20:57.640 And in just a few clicks, you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top-tier table games.

00:21:04.100 Make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at Golden Nugget Online Casino.

00:21:13.560 Take a spin on the slots, challenge yourself at the tables, or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action.

00:21:20.040 All from the comfort of your own devices.

00:21:21.860 Why settle for less when you can go for the gold at Golden Nugget Online Casino?

00:21:27.560 Gambling problem?

00:21:28.460 Call ConnexOntario, 1-866-531-2600.

00:21:32.780 19 and over.

00:21:33.680 Physically present in Ontario.

00:21:35.060 Eligibility restrictions apply.

00:21:36.660 See goldennuggetcasino.com for details.

00:21:39.140 Please play responsibly.

00:21:41.300 There's also the theory that I thought was true for many years,

00:21:46.460 that if you had two engineers or, you know, two nerdy people who got married,

00:21:52.960 that they were more likely to have a kid who was on the spectrum.

00:21:58.080 And apparently that's not true either.

00:22:01.060 There's not really much evidence at all.

00:22:03.480 There's no evidence for it.

00:22:05.300 So what's that leave?

00:22:07.060 That leaves either some big difference in diagnosis or food or pollution, right?

00:22:18.680 So the increase in autism would have to be food-related or pollution-related

00:22:24.180 if it's not vaccination and it's not genetic.

00:22:29.820 So we'll see if we find out.

00:22:31.840 It would be quite an amazing thing if RFK Jr. and Trump can get the science pointed in the right direction

00:22:41.340 and figure out what's behind all that.

00:22:44.840 Maybe it's just food.

00:22:47.200 Well, there's the big, beautiful bill that's being now debated in the Senate past the House.

00:22:54.640 But I wanted to give you a little persuasion lesson here.

00:23:00.100 So the Republicans and the Democrats are going to have different persuasion approaches.

00:23:06.920 The Democrats are going to say, this is the worst bill ever.

00:23:10.700 And the Republicans are going to say, it's the best thing ever.

00:23:15.040 But I looked at how the both sides are talking about it in a publication on The Hill,

00:23:25.780 a story about it.

00:23:26.680 So here's a little quiz.

00:23:30.900 We'll see if you're on the same page with me.

00:23:36.180 So Democrats say that the big, beautiful bill that the Republicans are putting together

00:23:42.740 is Republicans are cutting your health care to give tax breaks to Trump's rich buddies,

00:23:50.440 raising costs for average Americans.

00:23:52.720 Is that good persuasion?

00:23:55.540 Now, forget about what's true, right?

00:23:58.200 Because nobody knows what's true.

00:24:00.260 We're not going to look at the details of the big, beautiful bill.

00:24:04.380 We're just going to hear them talking about it.

00:24:07.000 Is that good persuasion?

00:24:08.680 Republicans are cutting health care to give tax breaks to Trump's rich buddies,

00:24:14.860 raising costs for average Americans.

00:24:18.320 Persuasive or not?

00:24:19.460 The answer is really persuasive.

00:24:25.340 Because where it says they're cutting health care,

00:24:30.560 it's always more persuasive to say they're taking something away from you.

00:24:35.700 Right?

00:24:36.020 So they got that right.

00:24:39.000 They're taking something away from you.

00:24:40.720 But then they're taking it away from you so they can give something to the rich people.

00:24:46.180 So now you've got envy.

00:24:49.020 So you've got the persuasion of losing something in health care, 0.99

00:24:54.600 along with the envy that it goes to those damn rich people. 0.97

00:24:58.520 And then raising costs for average Americans, that's a little less persuasive. 0.99

00:25:05.160 But what about the Republicans?

00:25:08.120 Republicans say,

00:25:10.440 oh, also what the Democrats say is the GOP tax scam doubles down on all the anxieties

00:25:18.760 the public has about the D.C. politicians prioritizing their wealthy friends over everyday people.

00:25:26.020 That's pretty good, too.

00:25:28.960 Because they're saying that they're treating you like second-class citizens

00:25:34.780 if you're not among the rich.

00:25:37.120 Well, you can feel that, right?

00:25:41.100 Suppose you thought it was true that the Republicans were going to treat the less rich people

00:25:48.840 as sort of, you know, low priority.

00:25:53.420 Well, that would be pretty good persuasion.

00:25:56.300 All right.

00:25:56.500 The Republicans are saying that Democrats want tax hikes,

00:26:01.300 handouts for illegal immigrants,

00:26:03.560 and to protect fraud.

00:26:05.300 Is that persuasive?

00:26:09.460 No.

00:26:11.980 No, that's not persuasive.

00:26:14.400 Democrats want tax hikes?

00:26:19.300 It just sort of sits there.

00:26:21.380 Because, you know, you always expect all your politicians want to do a tax hike.

00:26:26.920 How about handouts for illegal immigrants? 0.99

00:26:30.180 Well, I mean, the Democrats kind of like that.

00:26:36.780 How about protecting fraud?

00:26:39.420 Nobody even knows what that is.

00:26:41.980 So, if you compare the messaging, the Democrats have the better persuasion.

00:26:47.600 They've got the something is taken away.

00:26:50.100 Now, you could argue that the Republicans saying that Democrats want tax hikes is taking something away.

00:27:01.160 But it's not worded that way.

00:27:03.900 If they wanted it to be persuasive, the Republicans would say Democrats want to pick your pocket.

00:27:10.840 Then it's turned into taking something away, which would be better persuasion.

00:27:18.560 And handouts for illegal immigrants, I don't know how many people are feeling like they're directly affected by that.

00:27:27.800 But it's a little conceptual.

00:27:30.780 And then protect fraud?

00:27:33.280 Do they really want to protect fraud?

00:27:36.140 Do you really think the other side wants to protect fraud?

00:27:39.940 That's not very persuasive.

00:27:44.940 So, I would say that the Democrats have a stronger, just messaging-wise, they're a little bit stronger on that.

00:27:52.860 Well, there's yet another JFK-file hearing in Congress.

00:28:02.540 Representative Anna Paulina Luna, she says,

00:28:06.660 Based on the new evidence presented during yesterday's JFK hearing,

00:28:11.600 it is increasingly clear that elements within our own government have been blocking the release of truth pertaining to the assassination of President Kennedy.

00:28:20.700 And I guess Mr. Hardaway from the Select Committee on Assassination said,

00:28:28.540 For the past 62 years, the CIA has actively and continuously obstructed the investigation of the assassination, blah, blah, blah.

00:28:37.820 How many of you think you're ever going to figure out, or ever know for sure, what happened with JFK?

00:28:45.000 I feel like the default is that the elements of the CIA, and elements of our government, and elements of the mafia,

00:28:56.880 which would have a connection to the CIA, assassinated the President.

00:29:02.640 I feel like I don't really need to know much more.

00:29:07.780 You know, maybe the names of the people involved.

00:29:10.800 But how many of you think it's not?

00:29:14.000 Some people in the government, some people in the CIA, and some people in the mafia.

00:29:21.700 I feel like that's just kind of obvious at this point.

00:29:25.960 So, I don't have any curiosity about it at all anymore.

00:29:30.900 To me, it looks like it's, you know, case closed.

00:29:34.700 That's exactly what it was.

00:29:37.180 But, do you remember when we were going to see stuff about UFOs?

00:29:42.700 Are you still waiting for your UFO?

00:29:45.920 Your UFO files?

00:29:48.800 I can't wait for them to open up that warehouse.

00:29:51.460 It's got all the downed UFOs that we keep finding.

00:29:56.720 No.

00:29:57.800 We will never see any UFOs.

00:30:01.220 What about the Epstein files?

00:30:04.620 Well, I don't know.

00:30:07.160 Kash Patel still says they're coming.

00:30:11.460 But are you really going to see any good stuff?

00:30:15.420 I don't know.

00:30:17.120 It doesn't seem likely.

00:30:19.100 I'm Chris Hadfield.

00:30:20.380 I'm an astronaut, an author, a citizen of planet Earth.

00:30:24.620 Join me for a six-part journey into the systems that power the world.

00:30:29.600 Real conversations with real people who are shaping the future of energy.

00:30:34.740 No politics, no empty talk.

00:30:37.180 Just solutions-focused conversations on the challenges we must overcome

00:30:42.260 and the possibilities that lie ahead.

00:30:44.660 This is On Energy.

00:30:47.120 Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

00:30:50.380 Well, as you know, Trump is going hard at Harvard

00:30:54.520 and he's now telling them that they have to get rid of their international undergrad students.

00:31:01.040 There are about 6,800 of them.

00:31:03.880 And one of the things they do is they pay full price for tuition,

00:31:08.300 which is, you know, unusual.

00:31:10.500 So it's bad for Harvard on an income level.

00:31:16.740 But it might be bad for them on a number of other levels.

00:31:20.920 So that's a big deal.

00:31:23.540 But I was listening to Mike Benz talk about Harvard's real role.

00:31:27.620 And it turns out, if you thought Harvard was just a college with a great reputation

00:31:33.960 and they were doing some research for the government, you know,

00:31:37.920 there was some funding for research,

00:31:39.960 you were not even close to understanding what Harvard was or is.

00:31:45.400 Apparently, and I can't do a good job of explaining the Mike Benz take on it.

00:31:53.940 Well, Harvard is basically part of the deep state CIA revolving door with.

00:32:04.300 So right now, who is it?

00:32:06.800 Jake Sullivan.

00:32:07.920 Mike Benz has pointed this out.

00:32:09.900 So Jake Sullivan, a Democrat, who had recently been in charge of the state DOD and CIA portfolios for Biden.

00:32:22.120 And as soon as the administration is replaced by Republicans, he goes to work at Harvard

00:32:29.460 and basically just goes into the same kind of, you know, power operation.

00:32:37.280 It's just through Harvard.

00:32:38.740 So Harvard apparently had gigantic funding, all kinds of connections to the government.

00:32:47.520 It was using many of its departments, of which, you know,

00:32:51.780 the almost uncountable number of entities within Harvard,

00:32:56.800 to work against Trump and against, to create censorship,

00:33:04.920 including probably censorship of the, of the local population and to influence other governments.

00:33:12.580 So whatever you thought Harvard was, apparently it wasn't that.

00:33:20.920 It was a very dark, powerful, you know, maybe running the country from the background.

00:33:29.740 It's almost impossible to understand how much power they had and still have.

00:33:36.700 But I guess Trump understands because he's, you know, dismantling their funding and, you know,

00:33:42.720 trying to bring them under control.

00:33:44.680 So I can't do a good job of explaining this.

00:33:49.080 So listen to Mike Benz talking about all the things that Harvard is up to.

00:34:00.100 Yeah.

00:34:00.900 I guess I'll stay away from all the details there because he does it better.

00:34:04.380 All right.

00:34:09.820 Let's talk about this.

00:34:12.100 Have you noticed that the Democrats are at least pretending to be in the process of some kind of awakening?

00:34:21.740 You know, Jake Tapper is suddenly awakened to the idea that Biden's brain was defective.

00:34:29.560 And, uh, morning, Joe, they're now sort of awakened to the fact that the administration could be lying to them on a regular basis.

00:34:40.840 And it makes you wonder, could it be the beginning of a larger awakening?

00:34:47.640 I don't know.

00:34:49.240 But, uh, I posted this yesterday and got 1.2 million views.

00:34:54.140 I said, if you were surprised Biden's brain was broken and you were shocked to learn the fine people story was a hoax,

00:35:02.460 wait until you learn January 6th was the opposite of an insurrection.

00:35:08.540 Because I feel like you can, you know, maybe it's a long shot,

00:35:14.000 but I wonder if you could further awaken the Democrats so they understand that they were always the bad guys.

00:35:21.200 The thing that always amazed me about January 6th is that nobody ever talked to the people who were protesting to ask them what their intention was.

00:35:36.280 That's the most important part of the story, right?

00:35:40.040 It's the dog that's not barking times thousands.

00:35:44.020 There were thousands of dogs, let's just say attendees,

00:35:47.900 and they were, they were either thinking to themselves that election was totally fair, but we don't like it.

00:35:57.080 So we're going to try to overthrow the government.

00:35:59.900 Now that's what the Democrat leaning, uh, press has been telling you for years.

00:36:07.860 Is that true?

00:36:09.720 Well, nobody asked the protesters.

00:36:11.560 I would think that you would bring in a panel of protesters and say,

00:36:17.260 all right, what were you thinking?

00:36:20.260 Now, some of them, you know, I don't know, 1% or something were violent

00:36:25.140 and probably did want to overthrow the country and, you know, who knows what.

00:36:30.300 But I'll bet 98% thought to themselves,

00:36:35.400 um, I think this election looks like it was rigged.

00:36:40.500 I'd like to take a pause to make sure it wasn't.

00:36:44.080 That would be protecting the Republic.

00:36:47.460 That would be overthrowing an insurrection.

00:36:51.740 Now that doesn't mean they're right,

00:36:54.460 but their intention is the entire story.

00:36:59.060 Somehow we got sold on the idea that their physical actions

00:37:05.640 told you everything you needed to know.

00:37:08.980 Well, they physically trespassed.

00:37:12.500 They physically entered the building.

00:37:15.040 They physically tried to delay things.

00:37:18.360 So therefore it was an insurrection.

00:37:20.920 That's not how that works.

00:37:24.600 Everything depended on what they were thinking

00:37:26.800 and nobody ever asked.

00:37:29.360 Or at least didn't ask enough of them that you would get a sense for it.

00:37:33.740 And in my opinion, it's obvious

00:37:36.580 that what they were thinking

00:37:38.440 is that the government had been overthrown

00:37:42.060 and they were looking at a way to make sure that it was protected.

00:37:47.460 They were trying to protect the Republic

00:37:49.380 and they thought that they could do something

00:37:52.140 by, you know, entering the building and protesting

00:37:54.960 and slowing things down

00:37:57.060 and maybe getting a little pause

00:37:58.900 to check the hinkiness of the vote.

00:38:03.500 Now, how many of you have ever just noticed

00:38:06.140 that the most important thing,

00:38:09.640 what were they thinking,

00:38:11.600 has been completely ignored?

00:38:15.160 It's all you need to know.

00:38:16.580 All you need to know is that the news

00:38:18.980 completely ignored

00:38:20.740 the absolute number one important thing.

00:38:25.100 What were they thinking?

00:38:29.200 Unbelievable.

00:38:29.720 So, I'd love to see someday the Democrats say,

00:38:35.360 wait a minute,

00:38:36.440 are you telling me that they weren't there

00:38:38.020 to overthrow the government?

00:38:39.700 Yes, that's what I'm telling you.

00:38:41.600 They were not there to overthrow the government.

00:38:43.940 They were there to protect the government. 1.00

00:38:45.480 You put them in fucking jail, 1.00

00:38:47.980 you bastards. 1.00

00:38:50.720 Anyway. 1.00

00:38:52.860 I'm going to give you a vague update

00:38:57.120 on my health situation.

00:38:59.080 Most of you are up to date.

00:39:00.320 You know that I have a fatal form of cancer,

00:39:04.820 prostate that has metastasized my bones.

00:39:10.780 So, in theory, if I didn't do anything,

00:39:14.760 and it's sort of incurable,

00:39:16.760 so there's not much you can do,

00:39:18.160 I would be dead pretty soon.

00:39:21.260 However, I have decided on a path of treatment

00:39:26.900 that I'm not going to tell you about.

00:39:30.240 Now, it has to do with real doctors.

00:39:34.420 It's not going to be me grazing in my backyard

00:39:37.560 and rubbing mud on myself,

00:39:39.920 like most of you are recommending.

00:39:42.800 I'm not going to be taking ivermectin.

00:39:45.780 You know, I'm not going to be

00:39:47.940 spending more time in the sun.

00:39:50.360 I'm sure all those are good things,

00:39:52.280 but I don't believe any of them

00:39:53.920 would make me better.

00:39:55.540 I think somebody would have noticed

00:39:56.960 if you could cure incurable cancers

00:40:00.080 with, you know,

00:40:01.560 just sort of minor diet changes

00:40:03.500 and things like that.

00:40:04.860 So, the reason I'm not going to tell you

00:40:07.120 what I'm going to do

00:40:09.060 is because I know

00:40:11.000 what the reaction would be.

00:40:13.240 Somebody would tell me

00:40:14.580 I'm crazy

00:40:15.880 and, you know, 0.87

00:40:17.300 I should eat mud 0.99

00:40:18.560 and do some damn thing. 0.99

00:40:22.400 And so, the goodwill 0.99

00:40:24.560 that I experienced

00:40:25.560 for the last several days,

00:40:27.060 which has been really good,

00:40:28.840 like unbelievably kind and generous,

00:40:31.980 started to turn today.

00:40:33.660 So, now the anti-vaxxers came out

00:40:39.100 and I knew that was going to happen.

00:40:41.840 The anti-vaxxers came out

00:40:43.440 and they're asking,

00:40:45.660 huh, did you get the cancer

00:40:48.580 after you got the vaccination? 0.54

00:40:52.220 And these are just terrible people.

00:40:55.540 Now, I'm not even saying

00:40:56.960 that it's the wrong question.

00:40:58.560 What I'm saying is

00:40:59.740 it's not the right question for you.

00:41:01.600 It might be a question for a doctor.

00:41:04.420 It might be a good question

00:41:05.420 for a researcher.

00:41:06.600 It might be a good question for me.

00:41:09.200 But it's not what you should be speculating on.

00:41:13.040 And, by the way,

00:41:14.120 if you go to Grok or some AI,

00:41:17.260 you'll find out

00:41:17.860 that there's no known connection.

00:41:20.280 At least that's what the official word is.

00:41:24.360 But, so I won't tell you what I'm doing,

00:41:26.580 but I'll tell you that my odds of survival,

00:41:29.040 just because I've picked a path

00:41:32.860 that most of you have never heard of.

00:41:36.020 All right.

00:41:36.500 So, if you're saying to yourself,

00:41:38.480 I wonder if it's X.

00:41:41.200 No, because you've heard of it.

00:41:43.700 If you say,

00:41:44.860 I wonder if it's Y.

00:41:46.820 It isn't,

00:41:48.240 because you've heard of that.

00:41:49.540 So, only a very few of you

00:41:53.960 would have ever been heard of

00:41:55.780 the path I'm taking.

00:41:57.960 But it's with top doctors.

00:42:00.420 It's not something I'm making up.

00:42:02.540 You know,

00:42:02.780 it's not some little thing

00:42:04.080 I'm doing on my own.

00:42:05.760 It's with top doctors in the field

00:42:07.840 who know a lot about this.

00:42:10.180 And it looks like my odds of survival

00:42:12.580 may have jumped from zero

00:42:14.480 to something closer to 30%,

00:42:18.180 which means

00:42:21.140 don't do my funeral yet.

00:42:26.980 I've got a solid 30% chance

00:42:29.780 of getting on the other side of this.

00:42:34.100 And by the way,

00:42:34.680 this is brand new.

00:42:36.480 Like,

00:42:36.860 this is information

00:42:38.480 that I was not aware of

00:42:39.920 until just recently.

00:42:43.000 So, I will give you updates

00:42:44.600 at some point,

00:42:45.500 but not until I know

00:42:47.380 if it's working,

00:42:48.200 which actually won't take long.

00:42:50.340 So, in a matter of,

00:42:52.400 I don't know,

00:42:53.160 a month or so,

00:42:55.080 I should have a pretty good idea

00:42:56.740 if it's working.

00:42:59.600 But I'll let you know.

00:43:01.780 Now,

00:43:02.640 some of you might want to

00:43:04.860 click off now.

00:43:07.140 Let's see what time it is.

00:43:09.920 But,

00:43:10.960 because I'm getting such pushback

00:43:13.260 from the anti-vaxxers,

00:43:15.840 I wondered if you'd like to do a quiz

00:43:19.900 to find out

00:43:21.560 how much you really know

00:43:22.860 about the vaccination

00:43:24.920 versus the COVID.

00:43:28.660 Because I'm curious.

00:43:30.220 Because I think 20% of the country

00:43:32.340 didn't get vaccinated,

00:43:33.900 and they're very happy

00:43:35.060 that they didn't.

00:43:35.860 And they would consider themselves

00:43:37.340 purebreds and heroes.

00:43:41.440 Now,

00:43:42.000 what I'm observing,

00:43:43.880 and I can't tell for sure

00:43:45.160 what people are thinking,

00:43:46.640 is it looks to me

00:43:47.860 like the people

00:43:48.520 who went through the pandemic

00:43:49.740 and got what they consider

00:43:52.040 to be the right answer

00:43:54.320 while most of the world

00:43:56.280 was getting the wrong answer.

00:43:58.480 They're sort of trapped

00:43:59.760 in a world

00:44:00.420 where that was their greatest hits.

00:44:02.080 And they want to relive

00:44:04.860 that feeling

00:44:05.640 where they got everything right.

00:44:09.020 And it is so annoying

00:44:10.700 that it's just

00:44:13.380 absolutely unbelievable.

00:44:15.520 So,

00:44:16.060 I wanted to give you

00:44:16.800 a little quiz,

00:44:18.100 especially if you're

00:44:19.020 an anti-vaxxer.

00:44:20.740 But everybody can play.

00:44:22.260 When I found out

00:44:23.440 my friend got a great deal

00:44:24.880 on a wool coat from Winners,

00:44:26.500 I started wondering,

00:44:28.140 is every fabulous item

00:44:29.760 I see from Winners?

00:44:31.280 Like that woman over there 1.00

00:44:32.540 with the designer jeans.

00:44:33.980 Are those from Winners?

00:44:35.500 Ooh,

00:44:36.140 or those beautiful gold earrings?

00:44:37.960 Did she pay full price?

00:44:39.320 Or that leather tote?

00:44:40.320 Or that cashmere sweater?

00:44:41.520 Or those knee-high boots?

00:44:43.000 That dress?

00:44:43.780 That jacket?

00:44:44.460 Those shoes?

00:44:45.480 Is anyone paying full price

00:44:47.220 for anything?

00:44:48.420 Stop wondering.

00:44:49.700 Start winning.

00:44:50.640 Winners.

00:44:51.220 Find Fabulous.

00:44:52.000 for less.

00:44:53.320 Question number one.

00:44:55.680 True or false

00:44:56.760 that during the initial part

00:45:00.380 of people getting vaccinated,

00:45:02.560 elite athletes were 0.72

00:45:04.220 dropping dead on the field

00:45:06.160 in a way that would be

00:45:09.440 way outside of the norm.

00:45:12.180 True or false,

00:45:13.240 elite athletes

00:45:14.440 were just falling down

00:45:16.560 dead on the field.

00:45:19.040 How many of you think

00:45:20.240 that that was true?

00:45:22.000 the answer is

00:45:25.020 not true.

00:45:26.880 There's no evidence

00:45:27.860 for it whatsoever.

00:45:30.380 Number two.

00:45:32.380 How many of you think

00:45:33.960 the virus

00:45:35.260 was basically

00:45:37.300 just a common cold

00:45:38.980 versus a

00:45:41.260 weaponized virus?

00:45:44.280 virus.

00:45:44.900 So how many of you think

00:45:46.040 it was just

00:45:46.540 a common cold

00:45:47.620 versus

00:45:48.900 a weaponized

00:45:50.240 virus?

00:45:53.380 Well,

00:45:53.920 we know it was

00:45:54.580 made in a

00:45:55.400 gain-of-function

00:45:56.180 lab,

00:45:56.820 and the

00:45:59.040 gain-of-function

00:45:59.880 lab

00:46:00.480 would have

00:46:01.200 what purpose?

00:46:02.940 Why,

00:46:03.420 here,

00:46:03.960 I guess this is

00:46:04.720 a related question.

00:46:06.160 Why would a lab

00:46:07.720 even work

00:46:09.760 on gain-of-function?

00:46:10.700 what would be

00:46:12.340 the point

00:46:12.740 of doing it?

00:46:14.760 The answer is

00:46:16.020 to make it

00:46:17.300 more dangerous

00:46:18.040 or

00:46:19.860 to be ready

00:46:21.420 in case somebody

00:46:22.380 else made

00:46:22.920 one more dangerous.

00:46:23.880 at what point

00:46:27.940 did you know

00:46:29.700 it was

00:46:30.380 coming from

00:46:31.240 a gain-of-function

00:46:32.840 lab,

00:46:33.840 and did you know

00:46:35.640 that the gain-of-function

00:46:37.000 only has

00:46:38.280 one purpose,

00:46:39.720 which is

00:46:40.460 weaponization

00:46:41.200 or protection

00:46:42.160 from weaponization,

00:46:43.580 which is

00:46:44.020 a bad argument.

00:46:47.460 So when you

00:46:48.220 got,

00:46:49.080 when you either

00:46:49.700 decided to get

00:46:50.620 the shot

00:46:51.140 or not the shot,

00:46:52.940 did you know

00:46:53.640 that it was

00:46:54.160 weaponized?

00:46:57.040 Next question.

00:47:00.400 Given that

00:47:01.420 America funded it,

00:47:03.640 and there must

00:47:04.320 have been

00:47:04.580 Americans involved,

00:47:06.020 you know,

00:47:06.240 spooky people,

00:47:08.180 do you think

00:47:09.240 that the people

00:47:11.540 who developed

00:47:12.380 the shots

00:47:13.260 were told

00:47:15.220 by the

00:47:16.080 military

00:47:16.760 or CIA

00:47:17.920 or whoever

00:47:18.720 was involved

00:47:19.460 what the nature

00:47:21.560 of the weaponization

00:47:22.660 was?

00:47:23.640 so that

00:47:24.520 when they

00:47:24.840 worked on

00:47:25.280 the shot,

00:47:26.440 they could

00:47:27.320 make sure

00:47:27.780 that they

00:47:28.180 were directly

00:47:29.520 addressing

00:47:30.120 the weaponization.

00:47:33.160 I don't know.

00:47:34.540 So that one,

00:47:35.240 I don't know

00:47:35.720 the answer to that.

00:47:36.800 But if they

00:47:37.300 did know,

00:47:38.740 it seems likely

00:47:39.740 they would have

00:47:40.280 told the people

00:47:40.880 developing the shot

00:47:41.920 so they could

00:47:42.600 get the best

00:47:43.080 outcome.

00:47:44.460 Next question.

00:47:45.340 if you were

00:47:47.660 going to

00:47:48.100 weaponize a

00:47:49.040 virus,

00:47:50.500 how quickly

00:47:51.940 would you

00:47:52.520 make it

00:47:53.200 kill somebody?

00:47:56.220 Would you 1.00

00:47:56.940 make it

00:47:57.540 operate

00:47:58.540 really fast,

00:48:00.920 as in,

00:48:01.840 you know,

00:48:02.140 within a week?

00:48:03.960 Or would you

00:48:04.900 make it

00:48:05.540 cripple people 1.00

00:48:07.200 so that everybody

00:48:08.640 had to take care

00:48:09.540 of them for the

00:48:10.280 rest of their

00:48:10.760 life?

00:48:11.160 The answer

00:48:12.960 is that if

00:48:13.600 you're

00:48:13.800 weaponizing it,

00:48:15.240 you don't

00:48:15.660 make it so

00:48:16.240 that it

00:48:16.560 instantly kills 1.00

00:48:17.500 people. 0.99

00:48:18.280 You make it

00:48:19.180 so that it

00:48:19.820 weakens them

00:48:20.760 or weakens

00:48:22.180 the society.

00:48:24.480 Weakening

00:48:24.820 the society

00:48:25.600 would be

00:48:26.180 pretty devastating.

00:48:28.440 Now,

00:48:29.420 next question.

00:48:31.980 If you

00:48:32.920 got COVID

00:48:34.520 without the

00:48:36.140 shot,

00:48:37.980 and you

00:48:38.800 were male,

00:48:39.480 what would

00:48:39.860 happen to

00:48:40.260 your testosterone?

00:48:41.160 would your

00:48:43.140 testosterone go

00:48:44.420 up?

00:48:45.600 Would it

00:48:46.060 stay the

00:48:46.560 same if

00:48:47.300 you just

00:48:47.640 got COVID

00:48:48.320 without any

00:48:49.040 shot?

00:48:50.320 Or would

00:48:51.340 it go

00:48:52.760 down?

00:48:54.540 Well,

00:48:54.820 according to

00:48:55.380 Grok,

00:48:56.280 it would

00:48:57.600 go down.

00:49:00.540 That's what

00:49:01.380 Grok says.

00:49:02.800 Now,

00:49:03.360 would it

00:49:03.860 stay down

00:49:04.760 or would

00:49:06.560 it just

00:49:06.840 be temporary?

00:49:09.520 And

00:49:09.720 according to

00:49:10.560 Grok,

00:49:11.160 if you

00:49:11.780 got long

00:49:12.420 COVID,

00:49:13.600 it might

00:49:14.000 stay down.

00:49:15.540 Is long

00:49:16.460 COVID real?

00:49:19.440 According to

00:49:20.340 Grok,

00:49:20.820 yes.

00:49:22.440 So if you

00:49:23.320 were designing

00:49:23.940 a weapon

00:49:24.800 that you

00:49:26.220 thought was

00:49:26.660 going to

00:49:27.260 cripple some 1.00

00:49:28.220 other society,

00:49:29.720 would it be a

00:49:30.960 good weapon

00:49:31.480 if you

00:49:31.980 lowered their

00:49:32.760 testosterone

00:49:33.420 for some

00:49:35.480 percentage of

00:49:36.200 their population

00:49:37.120 and you

00:49:37.680 kept it

00:49:38.140 low,

00:49:38.460 would that

00:49:39.760 be a

00:49:40.020 good

00:49:40.140 weapon?

00:49:41.440 Because those

00:49:42.160 people would

00:49:43.120 not be as

00:49:45.800 aggressive,

00:49:46.620 they might

00:49:46.980 not reproduce

00:49:47.900 as much,

00:49:49.380 they might

00:49:49.960 not be as

00:49:50.500 successful.

00:49:52.800 Yeah,

00:49:53.340 it would be a

00:49:53.740 good weapon.

00:49:54.500 It would be a

00:49:54.800 really good

00:49:55.180 weapon.

00:49:56.640 Next,

00:49:57.640 for people who

00:49:58.980 are older,

00:49:59.840 well, I think we

00:50:00.520 all agree that if

00:50:01.400 you're a young

00:50:02.200 person and you

00:50:02.880 got the

00:50:03.260 shot, that 0.89

00:50:04.440 was probably

00:50:04.860 a bad

00:50:05.380 decision because

00:50:07.140 it was more

00:50:07.620 bad than good

00:50:08.320 when you're

00:50:08.700 young.

00:50:09.640 But let's

00:50:10.120 say over

00:50:10.720 60, does

00:50:13.120 the science

00:50:14.320 at the

00:50:14.780 moment,

00:50:15.800 doesn't mean

00:50:16.300 it's right,

00:50:17.580 but does the

00:50:18.180 science tell

00:50:18.820 you that it

00:50:19.460 protected people

00:50:20.460 from long

00:50:21.340 COVID if

00:50:23.560 they got the

00:50:24.100 shot?

00:50:26.420 And the

00:50:27.140 answer is

00:50:27.940 yes.

00:50:30.520 Now, that

00:50:31.080 does mean it's

00:50:31.580 true, but if

00:50:32.700 you check any

00:50:33.860 Google source

00:50:34.840 or Grok or

00:50:35.780 AI, they'll

00:50:37.260 all tell you

00:50:37.860 that if you

00:50:39.060 got the

00:50:39.540 shot, you 0.80

00:50:41.300 were much

00:50:41.940 less likely

00:50:42.580 to get long

00:50:43.360 COVID.

00:50:44.920 And the

00:50:45.380 long COVID

00:50:46.120 would be the

00:50:47.880 weaponized

00:50:48.520 thing.

00:50:50.620 So, putting

00:50:51.860 it all

00:50:52.240 together,

00:50:53.520 when did

00:50:54.700 you know it

00:50:55.300 was weaponized

00:50:56.440 versus just a

00:50:57.980 common cold?

00:50:59.720 And did

00:51:00.540 you know that

00:51:01.160 being weaponized

00:51:02.240 meant that

00:51:03.340 they would

00:51:03.800 give you

00:51:04.100 some long

00:51:04.900 term kind

00:51:06.380 of problems

00:51:06.960 like being

00:51:07.580 sleepy, you're

00:51:08.420 having low

00:51:08.940 testosterone, or

00:51:10.380 you know, just

00:51:11.460 some kind of

00:51:12.300 long-term

00:51:12.800 problem?

00:51:13.720 Would you

00:51:14.180 know that

00:51:14.680 that would

00:51:15.100 be the

00:51:15.420 goal of

00:51:15.960 it, of

00:51:16.900 a weaponized

00:51:17.580 virus, versus 0.86

00:51:19.200 killing you 0.84

00:51:19.840 right away? 0.99

00:51:21.960 How many of

00:51:22.760 you would know

00:51:23.140 that?

00:51:23.400 all right, and

00:51:30.000 what would be

00:51:30.540 the bigger

00:51:30.980 risk?

00:51:32.520 Would the

00:51:33.180 bigger risk

00:51:34.120 be that if

00:51:36.380 you didn't

00:51:36.960 get the

00:51:37.420 shot, then

00:51:39.280 you wouldn't

00:51:39.720 have those

00:51:40.300 spike proteins

00:51:41.200 running around,

00:51:42.520 but if you

00:51:43.500 did get the

00:51:44.260 shot, your 0.69

00:51:46.000 chances of

00:51:46.860 long COVID

00:51:47.560 would be far

00:51:48.440 less.

00:51:48.920 risk, which

00:51:50.360 of those is

00:51:51.040 the biggest

00:51:51.620 health risk?

00:51:55.140 I don't

00:51:55.560 know.

00:51:57.520 Beats

00:51:58.040 me, but

00:51:59.800 how would

00:52:00.120 you know?

00:52:06.780 All right, I

00:52:07.660 guess that's

00:52:08.140 the, I

00:52:11.180 guess those

00:52:11.560 are the

00:52:11.720 questions I

00:52:12.300 want to

00:52:12.520 ask.

00:52:13.100 So, here's

00:52:15.280 my take

00:52:16.700 on it.

00:52:18.920 If you're

00:52:19.680 in the

00:52:19.940 20% who

00:52:21.480 are really

00:52:22.720 proud of

00:52:23.420 the fact that

00:52:24.040 you got the

00:52:24.560 right answer

00:52:25.120 by not

00:52:26.500 introducing

00:52:27.060 yourself to

00:52:27.720 that risk,

00:52:29.060 did you

00:52:29.960 consider the

00:52:30.960 things that I

00:52:31.620 just talked

00:52:32.160 about?

00:52:32.880 That it

00:52:33.600 was weaponized,

00:52:35.120 that the

00:52:36.200 long COVID

00:52:37.020 would be the

00:52:38.080 presumed goal

00:52:39.600 of it, and

00:52:40.960 that the

00:52:41.380 shot probably

00:52:42.840 was designed

00:52:43.880 to reduce

00:52:45.400 the long

00:52:46.160 COVID

00:52:46.700 effect?

00:52:47.780 even far

00:52:49.180 more than

00:52:50.620 reducing the

00:52:51.580 ability for

00:52:52.520 it to

00:52:52.800 spread, which

00:52:53.560 it never

00:52:53.940 really did.

00:52:59.140 All right.

00:53:00.260 Now, some

00:53:01.120 of the things

00:53:01.540 I told you

00:53:02.240 may not be

00:53:04.020 true, but

00:53:05.720 they would be

00:53:07.060 the things that

00:53:07.660 you would find

00:53:08.160 if you looked

00:53:08.780 online and

00:53:09.620 tried to

00:53:10.380 research it.

00:53:11.420 So, I think

00:53:12.140 I got that

00:53:12.640 right.

00:53:12.900 All right.

00:53:14.540 So, if

00:53:15.280 you got

00:53:16.900 100% on

00:53:17.920 that quiz,

00:53:21.660 then you

00:53:22.700 can give

00:53:23.260 advice about

00:53:24.680 whether people

00:53:25.420 should have

00:53:25.940 had the 0.90

00:53:26.380 shot or

00:53:27.060 not.

00:53:28.260 And if

00:53:29.140 you got

00:53:29.580 any of

00:53:29.980 that wrong,

00:53:31.180 then maybe

00:53:32.360 you got the

00:53:32.980 right answer,

00:53:34.360 but didn't

00:53:35.960 do the

00:53:36.380 analysis,

00:53:37.640 at least the

00:53:39.120 way some

00:53:40.140 people would

00:53:40.620 have done

00:53:40.880 it.

00:53:43.000 All right.

00:53:49.040 The shot

00:53:49.840 had no

00:53:50.280 benefit.

00:53:52.980 Now, so

00:53:53.820 you would

00:53:54.260 doubt

00:53:54.640 everything that's

00:53:56.080 online, right?

00:53:57.560 If you're

00:53:58.240 saying the

00:53:58.660 shot had no

00:53:59.320 benefit, you're

00:54:01.000 saying that it

00:54:01.880 would not

00:54:02.320 reduce long

00:54:03.260 COVID, it

00:54:04.600 would not

00:54:05.040 reduce

00:54:05.500 hospitalizations

00:54:06.540 for people

00:54:07.300 over 60.

00:54:08.120 But 100%

00:54:10.140 of all the

00:54:11.220 science, unless

00:54:13.080 they made it

00:54:13.660 up, 100% of

00:54:15.540 all the

00:54:15.860 science says

00:54:16.540 it did reduce

00:54:17.360 your hospitalization

00:54:18.440 risk and it

00:54:20.200 did reduce

00:54:20.860 your long

00:54:21.880 COVID risk.

00:54:23.600 You can do

00:54:24.360 the search

00:54:24.780 yourself.

00:54:25.760 Now, that

00:54:26.020 doesn't mean

00:54:26.380 it's true, but

00:54:27.720 that's what we

00:54:28.260 know at this

00:54:28.800 point.

00:54:29.900 If you

00:54:30.200 believe that

00:54:31.100 you're saying

00:54:35.520 long COVID

00:54:36.180 isn't a

00:54:36.620 thing, well,

00:54:38.120 if you go

00:54:39.060 to Grok, it

00:54:40.540 will tell

00:54:40.860 you it

00:54:41.140 is a

00:54:41.420 thing.

00:54:43.520 So I

00:54:44.160 guess you're

00:54:45.420 doubting all

00:54:46.420 the science

00:54:47.020 and all the

00:54:47.860 AI and

00:54:49.340 everything that's

00:54:50.880 online.

00:54:52.780 Could be

00:54:53.620 right.

00:54:54.560 You could

00:54:55.080 be right.

00:54:56.100 But if

00:54:57.580 you didn't

00:54:58.700 even think of

00:54:59.580 those things

00:55:00.320 when you did

00:55:00.960 the analysis,

00:55:02.260 then you

00:55:03.360 were probably

00:55:04.340 missing some

00:55:05.220 tricks.

00:55:05.740 all right.

00:55:07.700 That's all

00:55:08.100 I got for

00:55:08.460 now.

00:55:09.180 I know

00:55:09.800 that's

00:55:10.100 annoying, but

00:55:11.680 I'm trying

00:55:12.120 to head

00:55:12.920 off the

00:55:13.720 most annoying

00:55:16.320 people in

00:55:16.860 the world

00:55:17.300 who didn't

00:55:18.940 get it

00:55:19.240 vaccinated, the

00:55:20.380 purebloods.

00:55:23.020 Don't live

00:55:23.740 in the past.

00:55:25.100 You got that

00:55:25.780 one thing

00:55:26.380 right.

00:55:28.940 That's it.

00:55:29.800 It doesn't

00:55:30.340 mean that you

00:55:30.840 know what

00:55:31.260 ivermectin does

00:55:32.200 for a cancer.

00:55:35.500 It's not

00:55:36.340 an indication

00:55:38.280 that you'll

00:55:38.820 get the next

00:55:39.420 thing right.

00:55:41.180 They're just

00:55:41.860 not connected.

00:55:48.420 I'm just

00:55:49.160 looking at

00:55:50.100 your comments

00:55:50.600 now.

00:55:51.200 All right.

00:55:51.560 Thanks,

00:55:51.940 everybody.

00:55:52.400 Thanks for

00:55:52.780 joining.

00:55:54.400 I will see

00:55:55.360 you again.

00:55:58.880 I'll see you

00:55:59.820 again tomorrow,

00:56:00.640 same time,

00:56:01.180 same place.

00:56:02.280 I'm going

00:56:02.540 to see if

00:56:02.940 I can get

00:56:03.480 just the

00:56:04.040 locals on

00:56:06.000 here.

00:56:06.460 So locals,

00:56:07.200 you'll be

00:56:07.480 private with

00:56:08.200 me in 30

00:56:08.920 seconds, if

00:56:09.640 this works.

00:56:32.120 they're about

00:56:33.580 about

00:56:34.100 your

00:56:34.780 contact

00:56:35.500 to

00:56:38.520 recognize

00:56:39.900 them.

00:56:41.140 Come on,

00:56:42.760 there.

00:56:43.340 You

00:56:44.040 have

00:56:44.560 been

00:56:45.540 1-

00:56:46.120 I will

00:56:47.360 stand

00:56:48.320 for

00:56:48.680 to

00:56:49.080 Thank you.

00:57:19.080 Thank you.

00:57:49.080 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 23, 2025

Episode 2848 CWSA 05⧸23⧸25

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript