Episode 2859 CWSA 06⧸05⧸25
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
117.633026
Summary
In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we discuss Bitcoin's halving, the future of nuclear power, the new Walt Disney animatronic Walt Disney character, and much more! Recorded in Baltimore, MD!
Transcript
00:00:00.080
sorry i'm late just a few seconds nothing you even notice well let's get my
00:00:07.280
locals people on here make sure i can see their comments and then then we gotta show
00:00:33.360
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with scott
00:00:40.240
atoms and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels
00:00:47.440
that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a
00:00:55.440
cup or a mug or a glass a tank or chelter's time a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it
00:01:02.480
with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the
00:01:08.400
dopamine of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it
00:01:25.680
all right so i wonder if there's any science that they could have saved some money on
00:01:34.160
if they had just asked me scott what do you think well oh here's some yeah from psypost eric nolan
00:01:43.920
uh turns out that ugly bystanders can make the other people look better
00:01:55.280
did you know that if you hang around with people who are uglier than you you'll look better well that's
00:02:05.280
why people hang around with me to look better i'm your invisible friend sometimes but sometimes i'm your
00:02:14.400
ugly friend so you if anybody asks hey do you have any friends yeah that cartoonist guy and then people
00:02:22.640
will think hmm you're awfully good looking compared to him so yes that's how you play that in other
00:02:34.000
so mit figured out how to make this little membrane that can separate uh fuel by molecular size
00:02:48.240
now that doesn't seem like a big deal does it hey they get a membrane that can separate
00:02:55.440
fuel by molecular size well it turns out if you can do that you don't need to do the expensive
00:03:04.160
process of refining and refining is uh energy intensive and it's a big deal
00:03:12.960
and it's a lot easier to just put things through a membrane and then it'll sort out the gas from
00:03:19.920
the oil and all that stuff so that's pretty impressive imagine it would uh cut the oil refining
00:03:28.640
energy cost by 90 percent if it worked speaking of other cool technologies american style um the according
00:03:39.040
to um an article in interesting engineering the world's first mass producible nuclear reactor
00:03:48.400
is uh all set for testing as a it's a u.s startup so a startup called radiance
00:03:55.520
is making a little uh one megawatt micro reactor that's based on a helium gas cool design
00:04:04.560
with passive safety architecture and no reliance on water for cooling
00:04:09.440
so it's more for harsh environments and remote places but does it surprise you that after
00:04:20.160
decades of nuclear power plants that seem to require water for cooling that suddenly there are all these
00:04:28.640
designs that don't require water for cooling and therefore ow and therefore they're completely safe
00:04:37.760
there's a really big deal happening in nuclear power so if these uh little micro reactors work
00:04:44.960
and if they are safe because that's one of the things if you don't if you don't have the water cooling
00:04:54.080
you can make them just shut down without any meltdown
00:05:06.880
uh there's going to be a new walt disney animatronic um character so the actual walt disney himself
00:05:17.840
he's uh going to be made into an updated animatronic i guess the granddaughter doesn't like it
00:05:25.040
but it's such a debut in july now the question i ask you is what's the difference between a robot
00:05:37.600
and the answer is animatronic is what you do when you can't make a robot
00:05:45.520
and i guess the granddaughter thought it was creepy yeah yeah she might she might so i don't think
00:05:53.760
anybody uh i can't imagine anyone booking a trip to walt disney because they got a animatronic walt
00:06:02.320
so maybe they need to do a little more than that well jp morgan is now going to accept bitcoin
00:06:14.800
as collateral for loans and that might not seem like a big deal to you but consider
00:06:23.200
that the ceo jb diamond uh once said that crypto was a fraud and a ponzi scheme
00:06:30.640
and now they're accepting it as uh collateral for your loan so things are changing i saw a exchange
00:06:41.440
between elon musk who said um i think several years ago he posted that uh bitcoin was a safe word
00:06:51.280
i think what he meant was you know if if regular money became worthless you know you'd always have
00:06:59.120
bitcoin and i saw a jack founder of twitter um saying bitcoin because it's sort of time for that safe word
00:07:11.840
maybe it is because uh well we'll talk about that so in the sort of funniest pr story uh you remember
00:07:25.280
the ex-white house secretary corinne jean pierre who was the worst press secretary any president ever had
00:07:35.440
um she has now written a book it's it's a memoir and it's called broken and the new york post is writing
00:07:46.960
about it and the funny part is that she was the spokesperson for the democrats during the biden
00:07:55.040
administration and at the end of it decided she didn't even want to be a democrat anymore
00:08:01.600
can you imagine her experience if she spent all that time being the face of democrats or at least in
00:08:11.920
terms of press and then when she was done with it she was like you know what i didn't want to be one of
00:08:19.600
these people so i suspect she got a lot of uh a lot of pushback i saw separately a sort of post
00:08:29.520
that suggested that uh she was uh difficult to work with so maybe the other democrats had some issues
00:08:38.800
with her we don't know um but i will compliment her for coming up with that idea of uh changing parties
00:08:49.200
because it's a real attention getter if the only thing she did was introduce yet another book
00:08:57.840
about those times then i would say well you know that's not too impressive but if she announces she's
00:09:05.920
changing parties well how do you ignore that so to me it sounds like maybe it was her idea but maybe it
00:09:16.400
was a book publicist you can't really tell if it was the book publicist's idea it was a really good idea
00:09:24.240
it's because you can't ignore it well in other news
00:09:32.080
very unsurprising uh trump said he would be ready to extend the tick tock ban
00:09:39.520
uh as you know tick tock is scheduled to be banned if we can't find a u.s buyer and china is somewhat
00:09:51.840
unwilling to sell so that never came together but uh trump says he's poised to expand it
00:09:59.280
and apparently that'll get wrapped in with some of his other trade talks with china so i think china
00:10:07.440
wants to keep it as uh one more thing they can hold over the heads of the u.s because you know
00:10:15.200
one of trump's biggest donors i believe is one of the biggest owners of tick tock
00:10:20.800
so an american guy so i don't see any uh scenario in which trump is going to ban tick tock because he
00:10:30.880
said it worked for him now if you want to know how safe tick tock is you wouldn't have to go back too
00:10:38.640
far to find uh fox news was doing stories about tick tock was you know reprogramming our youth and it was
00:10:47.280
terrible and then suddenly there would be a bunch of tick tock commercials on fox news did anybody
00:10:55.520
notice that and then after i don't know a year or two of tick tock commercials on fox news uh i think
00:11:04.400
it was yesterday i saw they announced that fox news would have its own uh tick tock presence
00:11:10.960
that's that's uh everything you need to know no it's not going to be banned because apparently
00:11:21.040
trump doesn't think it's dangerous to trump because they got him elected um so maybe he doesn't think
00:11:27.840
it's dangerous in general i don't know i don't know but doesn't look like it's going to get banned
00:11:33.840
um however talking about banning uh trump is going to ban or has uh seven countries
00:11:44.960
they'll be banned from entry into the united states now remember he did this once before
00:11:52.720
and he called it a muslim ban and everybody said we're racist racist you can't do that
00:12:00.400
and then he would point out well it's not every muslim country it's the ones that are you know a
00:12:06.320
problem and that didn't make people happy but he's had time to figure out how to do his
00:12:14.400
do his uh leadership a little bit more elegantly and now he just goes by country so he says afghanistan
00:12:23.920
mayanmar chad republic of the congo these are the ones with full uh travel restrictions uh equatorial guinea
00:12:35.600
uh eritrea haiti iran libya somalia sudan and yemen and then there's some with partial restrictions and
00:12:44.560
blah blah blah anyway um part of my theme today is to try to help democrats
00:12:53.600
with uh attracting men no not that way they they know how to attract men uh if they're gay men but
00:13:05.280
take this topic for example do you think that the uh the idea of restricting countries they have
00:13:14.240
military age men and potential terrorists and stuff do you think that's an idea that appeals to
00:13:20.720
men coming from the republican party or does it appeal to women i would argue that women would say
00:13:31.760
hey uh give me my diversity and don't you know don't uh paint all these people with the same brush
00:13:40.080
and let's have some empathy and maybe they need to escape their terrible countries and men would say
00:13:47.520
um shut up ladies this is military it's military it's not really about immigration it's a pure military
00:13:58.960
decision so if you were a young man and you wanted to be you know you're looking at the two parties
00:14:08.400
which of the two parties is a little closer to how you feel
00:14:12.480
well i would think that you would also feel that this is a military decision now you wouldn't know
00:14:20.560
the details you know like what is the specific risk from you know equatorial guinea but you would know
00:14:28.080
for sure that if the government banned them that there's some military risk and obviously this is this is
00:14:37.440
going beyond just immigration so it's not about immigration exactly it's about military risk
00:14:44.720
so once again an obvious case where men say oh well you republicans are doing what a man would want
00:14:54.560
you to do protecting the country and then we've got uh over in arizona katie hobbs
00:15:01.360
uh has a vetoed a bill that would have prevented um the well chinese-owned companies from having more than
00:15:17.280
30 percent of land in arizona uh meaning let me say that a different way that uh if a chinese company
00:15:28.000
owned more than 30 percent of a particular piece of land that would be banned because especially
00:15:35.920
if they seem to be near military assets now uh apparently that went through the legislation
00:15:44.480
or legislature in arizona and then uh governor katie hobbs vetoes it now what do you think men would do
00:15:55.120
men would definitely ban chinese chinese ownership of loss of land in their state
00:16:06.480
because they would see that as a military threat but katie hobbs did not so here again
00:16:15.440
you see the democrats doing a thing that looks anti-male or at least opposite of what
00:16:22.720
men would want or do or or feel then there's a story about the ukrainian drones
00:16:33.120
you know the story about the uh the gutsy attack by the ukrainians and they had russian truck drivers
00:16:41.840
drive truckloads worth of uh ukrainian drones and deep into russia and then they release them
00:16:50.080
and attack the airfield well did you think that was a bold military attack that was extra successful
00:17:02.240
or did you think that was a publicity thing which was primarily to raise money for more military stuff
00:17:09.920
well we're already getting the uh little trickle that says you know there are some people saying that
00:17:19.120
ukraine really didn't destroy that many airplanes in russia so it was successful but not nearly as
00:17:29.120
successful as they claimed it sounds almost as if they're trying to push some kind of
00:17:36.080
publicity so why would they do that why would they try to act like they're more successful
00:17:44.640
than they really were if that's true well uh let's look at what happened the uk
00:17:54.480
has uh agreed to give a hundred thousand new drones
00:17:58.160
drones to uh ukraine quote after the russian air strike airfield strikes now this is according to
00:18:06.720
newsweek now is that a do you think that's a total coincidence that um that right after this there's
00:18:16.880
this ukrainian claim that they had made great progress with drones
00:18:22.800
that suddenly the uk could approve 100 000 new drones for them i don't know if you look at the whole
00:18:32.080
picture it looks like it's kind of managed sort of a managed information situation as in
00:18:40.960
i don't think you can believe anything that comes down about ukraine
00:18:44.640
um but the one thing he always looked for is will this help them get more weapons yes if they can show
00:18:55.760
that they were super successful using uh drones against russia then it will be way easier for them to
00:19:04.720
get a whole bunch of new drones from the uk and sure enough that's what's happening
00:19:11.120
well you've probably heard that uh elon musk and president trump are not exactly on the same page
00:19:20.000
on a few things specifically the big beautiful bill the spending bill now uh if you're not familiar with the
00:19:31.920
the budget process in washington you're lucky because it's a mess
00:19:37.440
um this is just one kind of bill it's not the whole budget it's a recession recession thing
00:19:45.600
meaning it's something they can cut uh it's complicated so it's not the entire budget
00:19:52.560
but it does suggest that they're not looking at the kinds of cuts that elon musk and a lot of us would
00:20:00.400
like to see so uh what has elon said about the big beautiful bill he's called it a disgusting abomination
00:20:14.400
and abhorrent an abhorrent package of deficit-fueled uh spending and he said call your senator call your
00:20:23.680
congressman bankrupting america is not okay kill the bill so that doesn't leave much doubt where he's at
00:20:34.160
imagine being elon musk and doing all that work and all that personal sacrifice
00:20:41.200
literally putting his life on the line he had to have you know lots more security etc and then
00:20:49.200
you don't get the cuts you were hoping for now um is it stephen miller or somebody else says oh there's
00:20:58.800
1.6 trillion dollars in cuts do you believe that
00:21:06.320
cuts or is it just that they could have spent more and they didn't are they really cuts
00:21:14.080
because i don't know that they are and are those cuts so for one year or over 10 because 1.6 trillion
00:21:24.480
doesn't sound like it's over one year but you notice they always leave out the 10-year thing
00:21:31.040
because two years from now the budget will have nothing to do with anybody's intention
00:21:38.640
you know two years ago so you can make promises about how you'll cut the budget in the future
00:21:46.720
but you don't actually have to cut it because it's not the future so it does look like there's a little
00:21:53.760
trickery going on here um and i saw on cnn scott jennings was a kind of challenge to
00:22:02.160
essentially you know talk about the difference between musk and trump on the big beautiful
00:22:10.640
bill and i thought i thought jennings did a great job because instead of uh highlighting the differences
00:22:20.000
um he makes the point that the bill is you know right on point with what trump wants
00:22:25.680
but then he also makes the point that you know the country and musk and most of us want big cuts
00:22:33.120
and that the deficit is out of control so it was a very careful very careful scott jennings answer
00:22:43.600
because it it basically gave uh attention to both sides but he didn't suggest a solution because
00:22:53.280
what is the solution i don't know if there is one so that was a good answer
00:23:00.240
um and then apparently there's an issue about uh elon musk had a preference for the head of nasa
00:23:10.640
and it was somebody who had a spacex connection jared eisenman but he was rejected for reasons that are a
00:23:19.760
little unclear to me um and uh that makes elon not too happy and then uh i guess he's also not too happy
00:23:29.760
because the big beautiful bill repeals tax credits for electric vehicles which probably is a gigantic
00:23:40.080
um a gigantic difference to tesla so on one hand
00:23:48.320
it would be awkward if elon musk got a bunch of things in that bill that were specific and good for
00:23:54.960
him you know he got his own nasa guy kept his cuts for electric vehicles which doesn't really sound like
00:24:05.840
so i feel like if you were musk how would you feel right now i think you'd feel you did a bunch of work
00:24:14.720
for republicans and then they they kind of took from you the few things that would have been good for
00:24:22.320
your companies which is you know the head of nasa being his guy and uh electric uh credits the tax credits
00:24:33.600
for electric vehicles so i could see why he'd be a little pissed do you think uh elon musk will be able to
00:24:45.680
i think he might i don't know we'll watch in other news i find weird um ed martin
00:24:58.560
is uh he's a pardon attorney now did you know there was such a thing as a pardon attorney
00:25:10.320
well i guess we got one the post millennial was talking about this
00:25:14.400
um and uh i guess ed martin is going to look into some of these sketchy biden pardons
00:25:26.320
as well as uh clemency to 37 inmates on death row
00:25:33.360
so but why are we even looking into that it's sort of a weird thing to look into
00:25:39.440
because isn't the very nature of a pardon the thing that everybody doesn't like but
00:25:47.040
you're not supposed to ask questions because it's a you know it's a complete right of the president
00:25:53.680
i don't know i don't love the fact that somebody's looking into pardons
00:26:02.400
but if a president has the you know the total right to do something sketchy and then does
00:26:12.160
i don't know do you investigate that pardons are always sketchy
00:26:17.280
but we'll find out maybe maybe the auto pen was involved that always makes it fun
00:26:24.880
we like it when the auto pen is part of the story
00:26:27.360
well speaking of that uh big beautiful bill uh charlie kirk had a really good post on x
00:26:36.880
showing all the things in the bill that republicans would like and so i spent some time looking down
00:26:43.200
the list and i said to myself wow that's a lot of stuff i like so on one hand um it's very trumpian
00:26:53.360
and it's stuff he promised and uh you have to say that he's he's delivering on those things that are
00:27:01.680
on the list but charlie kirk um is uh sort of involved in a half opinion meaning if you're not
00:27:11.600
talking about the impact on the budget and the deficit it doesn't really matter how many good things
00:27:19.440
are in there because we're all dead that's my take so that's sort of similar to elon musk's yeah you
00:27:28.000
could have 50 great republican things in your bill but if the entire country is bankrupt in a year
00:27:38.240
none of those things help so it doesn't help me to know that it's full of things i would like
00:27:45.760
um it only helps me if you can tell me i'll still be alive in a year well maybe you
00:27:56.720
uh senator mike lee has proposed a constitutional amendment for keeping uh keeping things under
00:28:05.680
control fiscally he said uh that it would automatically oust every member of congress
00:28:12.880
of congress when inflation exceeds three percent now what do you think of that constitutional amendment
00:28:21.840
that whenever inflation exceeds three percent every member of congress gets fired
00:28:30.560
no well first of all i'm not sure congress has full control over inflation if they had a hundred
00:28:40.240
percent control over inflation then i would say well maybe but there are external events that you know
00:28:48.800
influence inflation but on top of that what are the odds we would ever get a constitutional amendment passed
00:28:58.080
in 2025 or 2026 do you think we would ever get a constitutional amendment passed
00:29:07.040
i don't think so i think it would just be partisan and that's enough to kill it
00:29:18.480
well you know for some time now i've been telling you that ai might be overrated and it might reach a plateau
00:29:30.800
and it might not have a direct path to so-called agi or artificial general intelligence i'm going to give you my
00:29:43.920
my best uh idiots version of what agi is compared to what we have now um and this is stolen from sundar
00:29:53.760
uh pj um the ceo of google he was talking about waymo and he said uh waymo is you know amazing technology that it can
00:30:05.760
drive around but he says you could teach a teenager how to drive in 20 hours and that's all the car does
00:30:14.160
now the difference between artificial general intelligence and just a thing that you train to do
00:30:23.120
a specific task like waymo is that we have the technology to make something to a specific set of
00:30:30.880
tasks that has a limited number of you know options but agi would be a general intelligence
00:30:42.240
that could figure stuff out that we hadn't figured out so for example uh you couldn't send an ai
00:30:51.360
that was designed today uh into your cabin in the woods and tell it look at the cabin figure out what
00:31:00.400
work it needs to do then order the parts and then do whatever handyman stuff needs to be done robot
00:31:08.720
now that would be general intelligence because because a human could do that but uh apparently
00:31:17.680
according to sundar and ceo of uh google we don't really have a direct path to that and that's the
00:31:27.760
one everybody's worried about so this is what i've been saying for some time and i was getting a little
00:31:34.000
pushback people were acting like oh no they're they're just gonna make the data centers bigger and
00:31:40.960
bigger until we reach you know general intelligence but i don't think we know what technology could get
00:31:49.120
us to general intelligence it's it's not doing more of what we're doing it would have to be invented
00:31:55.520
so i'll be curious if we can get there all right so the funniest story i probably spent too much time
00:32:08.880
on it is the idea of the democrats trying to attract men and i saw an article in the hill where it was
00:32:19.280
talking about various experts and consultants and they each had their own ideas about why the democrats
00:32:27.280
were not attracting men but i think i've talked about a bunch of them which is trump keeps doing
00:32:34.880
confident things that seem to have military utility that attracts men then you look at the uh the recent
00:32:44.480
uh signups for the military they're way up because trump treats the military with great respect and the
00:32:55.280
way he talks about it the way he funds it makes you think oh that's a respectable place to be do democrats
00:33:02.800
do that no not nearly as much so every time you see anything that would have a male female
00:33:10.880
um energy to it the republicans are doing the right thing not because they're trying to attract men
00:33:20.240
it's just this is the right thing you know closing the borders to countries that we we can't vet the
00:33:27.120
people come in that's really not male or female that's just smart it's just that men would have more
00:33:37.120
appreciation for the the military aspect of that and then they would say to themselves oh here's a country
00:33:44.320
that's serious about protecting itself i should uh maybe look into joining the military because that's a
00:33:52.160
respectable kind of career so sure enough recruitment is way up
00:33:58.960
but here here are some of the things the experts say about uh how the democrats can get back those men
00:34:08.000
they're losing uh one of them is uh let's see here here's some expert who said when you're not talking
00:34:15.920
about the working family you're never going to get those men back somebody named rosha said now let me
00:34:24.080
give you some advice if you'd ever like to be a political consultant i'm going to give you 10 years of
00:34:42.000
if you mention working families everybody will think you're a genius that's it every time i see a
00:34:50.400
democrat explaining why they haven't succeeded they say something like well we're not talking enough
00:34:56.720
about working families to which i say that's all it takes to be a democrat consultant or or the head of
00:35:06.720
the uh entire party all it takes is being able to say this the phrase working families
00:35:23.040
so oh uh we need authenticity and you can't manufacture it in a lab or a war room said rodel molyneau
00:35:34.560
we need authenticity well how do you get authenticity well one way would be to close the borders to
00:35:46.560
dangerous countries and just say that's my policy and to make sure that you're treating the military right
00:35:55.920
right there's no secret to it the things that attract men are pretty obvious to men so you can't get
00:36:06.720
authenticity by pretending to be authentic trump actually did close the border to those countries
00:36:16.240
trump actually does you know confident male things there's no authenticity needed he's just doing what he does
00:36:26.640
all right all right and then there's uh i love this one the the experts say that republicans became
00:36:34.480
better at speaking to men through podcasts god they're they're just so wrong about the podcast
00:36:43.280
i don't think that i don't think that joe rogan and uh theo vaughn were what caused men to be
00:36:53.040
become republicans i think men were leading republican and then there are two podcasters who were
00:37:01.360
compatible with how they were thinking the public so i i'm not so sure that joe rogan is moving the
00:37:11.280
political needle as much as the changes in politics that are happening because of trump
00:37:17.280
are creating some people who maybe are finding joe rogan so maybe they have cause and effect a little
00:37:24.880
backwards there so but i don't think the podcasters are a big part of the story actually i mean they're
00:37:30.960
they're a big part of the media story because they're hugely successful and influential
00:37:38.000
but i don't think they really are what make uh republican men like trump i don't think that's happening
00:37:51.840
um and then there's another one who says another consultant they met male voters exactly where they
00:38:00.240
were and we on the other hand had nothing comparable so they really believe that if they improved their
00:38:08.160
podcasting game but didn't change their policies that they would attract men does that sound real to you
00:38:18.480
like the the anti-gun people are just gonna have a you know have a better podcast it doesn't feel like it
00:38:30.080
it doesn't feel like that's gonna work i love the fact that they think it would
00:38:35.280
um and then there's a one consultant um strategist eddie vale who said one pretty simple and obvious answer
00:38:46.720
if you want uh blue colored men and women to support you go hang out with them and their unions
00:38:54.320
is that what trump did did trump go hang out with the blue colored men and their unions no
00:39:03.760
no that's not going to work but you can hang out with them all you want i don't i don't think that's
00:39:10.800
going to make a difference they're going to care about you know the defense of the country
00:39:16.000
and the closed borders are going to care about tariffs but they're not going to care if you
00:39:20.960
you're not going to learn anything they're hanging out with them
00:39:25.760
um and then uh and then veil quipped that democrats were still in the hey let's have another conference
00:39:35.360
phase of the rebuilding effort so they genuinely do believe the democrats too
00:39:42.320
there's a messaging problem as long as they think that they only have a messaging problem
00:39:48.720
and not a candidate problem or a policy problem they don't have any path there's no path to fixing it
00:39:57.200
meanwhile uh schumer i was talking about the big beautiful bill but he calls it
00:40:04.400
cleverly now look at look how clever this is he calls the big beautiful bill
00:40:12.000
well we're all going to die act death by a thousand paper cuts
00:40:20.720
so chuck schumer and here's what we're going to do we're going to call it the
00:40:26.400
the well we're all going to die act oh my god he was so lame the the best they could come up with
00:40:37.600
was changing the name of the act and then telling people that for a variety of technical reasons
00:40:44.480
that he calls a thousand paper cuts it will deny people the benefits who should have them
00:40:49.760
they are lost democrats are absolutely lost and then uh what about hakeem jeffries
00:41:01.440
so democratic leader hakeem jeffries he's calling to unmask ice agents
00:41:10.400
literally to name them so it becomes more dangerous to deport the dangerous people
00:41:16.000
people now is that a male or a female uh thing to do well i would say a male would want to keep the
00:41:27.600
bad people out of the country so they would support ice and they would support ice staying safe while
00:41:34.160
they do it but now one of the two leaders of the party wants to unmask literally unmask
00:41:50.400
oh my god that is so not male uh bright bar news has that story so do you see the pattern the pattern
00:42:01.920
is is what they do it's not how they talk about it it's not their podcasters it's their policies
00:42:11.040
and and then you look at their their main guy if you look at trump you see this you know confident
00:42:19.200
straight lace you know guy who can who will take somebody on a world leader take him on in the white
00:42:26.320
house uh we'll do any argument we'll take any question and put you down and then you compare it to
00:42:33.360
chuck schumer it's like yeah yeah chuck shower i'm a penguin yeah right yeah how are those even similar
00:42:45.280
one of them appeals to men in general and the other one just looks like some kind of a penguin with
00:42:51.360
glasses and you you don't even know what to think about it anyway so that ladies and gentlemen
00:43:03.200
is all i had to talk about today i think it's just enough time i got plenty of things to do today so
00:43:10.160
i gotta go run and do them and thanks everybody for uh letting me take yesterday off yesterday was
00:43:18.720
kind of eventful but uh i'm back if it looks like my neck is turned it's because i slept on it wrong and
00:43:28.240
hurts like crazy but uh other than that everything's fine and uh i'm gonna say hi to the
00:43:36.080
locals people privately but the rest of you thanks for joining we'll see you same time next well next 24