Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2859 CWSA 06⧸05⧸25

00:00:00.080 sorry i'm late just a few seconds nothing you even notice well let's get my

00:00:07.280 locals people on here make sure i can see their comments and then then we gotta show

00:00:16.560 well there it is looking good

00:00:33.360 good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called coffee with scott

00:00:40.240 atoms and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take this experience up to levels

00:00:47.440 that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains all you need for that is a

00:00:55.440 cup or a mug or a glass a tank or chelter's time a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it

00:01:02.480 with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the

00:01:08.400 dopamine of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it

00:01:13.760 happens now go ah delightful

00:01:25.680 all right so i wonder if there's any science that they could have saved some money on

00:01:34.160 if they had just asked me scott what do you think well oh here's some yeah from psypost eric nolan

00:01:43.920 uh turns out that ugly bystanders can make the other people look better

00:01:52.480 um how many of you didn't know that 0.96

00:01:55.280 did you know that if you hang around with people who are uglier than you you'll look better well that's

00:02:05.280 why people hang around with me to look better i'm your invisible friend sometimes but sometimes i'm your 0.93

00:02:14.400 ugly friend so you if anybody asks hey do you have any friends yeah that cartoonist guy and then people

00:02:22.640 will think hmm you're awfully good looking compared to him so yes that's how you play that in other

00:02:33.120 positive news

00:02:34.000 so mit figured out how to make this little membrane that can separate uh fuel by molecular size

00:02:48.240 now that doesn't seem like a big deal does it hey they get a membrane that can separate

00:02:55.440 fuel by molecular size well it turns out if you can do that you don't need to do the expensive

00:03:04.160 process of refining and refining is uh energy intensive and it's a big deal

00:03:12.960 and it's a lot easier to just put things through a membrane and then it'll sort out the gas from

00:03:19.920 the oil and all that stuff so that's pretty impressive imagine it would uh cut the oil refining

00:03:28.640 energy cost by 90 percent if it worked speaking of other cool technologies american style um the according

00:03:39.040 to um an article in interesting engineering the world's first mass producible nuclear reactor

00:03:48.400 is uh all set for testing as a it's a u.s startup so a startup called radiance

00:03:55.520 is making a little uh one megawatt micro reactor that's based on a helium gas cool design

00:04:04.560 with passive safety architecture and no reliance on water for cooling

00:04:09.440 so it's more for harsh environments and remote places but does it surprise you that after

00:04:20.160 decades of nuclear power plants that seem to require water for cooling that suddenly there are all these

00:04:28.640 designs that don't require water for cooling and therefore ow and therefore they're completely safe

00:04:37.760 there's a really big deal happening in nuclear power so if these uh little micro reactors work

00:04:44.960 and if they are safe because that's one of the things if you don't if you don't have the water cooling

00:04:54.080 you can make them just shut down without any meltdown

00:04:57.760 and that's what this little guy can do

00:05:01.120 meanwhile over at walt disney

00:05:04.400 where the technology is 30 years behind

00:05:06.880 uh there's going to be a new walt disney animatronic um character so the actual walt disney himself

00:05:17.840 he's uh going to be made into an updated animatronic i guess the granddaughter doesn't like it

00:05:25.040 but it's such a debut in july now the question i ask you is what's the difference between a robot

00:05:33.520 and an animatronic walt disney

00:05:37.600 and the answer is animatronic is what you do when you can't make a robot

00:05:45.520 and i guess the granddaughter thought it was creepy yeah yeah she might she might so i don't think

00:05:53.760 anybody uh i can't imagine anyone booking a trip to walt disney because they got a animatronic walt

00:06:02.320 so maybe they need to do a little more than that well jp morgan is now going to accept bitcoin

00:06:14.800 as collateral for loans and that might not seem like a big deal to you but consider

00:06:23.200 that the ceo jb diamond uh once said that crypto was a fraud and a ponzi scheme

00:06:30.640 and now they're accepting it as uh collateral for your loan so things are changing i saw a exchange

00:06:41.440 between elon musk who said um i think several years ago he posted that uh bitcoin was a safe word

00:06:51.280 i think what he meant was you know if if regular money became worthless you know you'd always have

00:06:59.120 bitcoin and i saw a jack founder of twitter um saying bitcoin because it's sort of time for that safe word

00:07:11.840 maybe it is because uh well we'll talk about that so in the sort of funniest pr story uh you remember

00:07:25.280 the ex-white house secretary corinne jean pierre who was the worst press secretary any president ever had 0.99

00:07:35.440 um she has now written a book it's it's a memoir and it's called broken and the new york post is writing

00:07:46.960 about it and the funny part is that she was the spokesperson for the democrats during the biden

00:07:55.040 administration and at the end of it decided she didn't even want to be a democrat anymore 0.93

00:08:01.600 can you imagine her experience if she spent all that time being the face of democrats or at least in

00:08:11.920 terms of press and then when she was done with it she was like you know what i didn't want to be one of

00:08:19.600 these people so i suspect she got a lot of uh a lot of pushback i saw separately a sort of post

00:08:29.520 that suggested that uh she was uh difficult to work with so maybe the other democrats had some issues 0.98

00:08:38.800 with her we don't know um but i will compliment her for coming up with that idea of uh changing parties

00:08:49.200 because it's a real attention getter if the only thing she did was introduce yet another book 0.98

00:08:57.840 about those times then i would say well you know that's not too impressive but if she announces she's

00:09:05.920 changing parties well how do you ignore that so to me it sounds like maybe it was her idea but maybe it

00:09:16.400 was a book publicist you can't really tell if it was the book publicist's idea it was a really good idea

00:09:24.240 it's because you can't ignore it well in other news

00:09:32.080 very unsurprising uh trump said he would be ready to extend the tick tock ban

00:09:39.520 uh as you know tick tock is scheduled to be banned if we can't find a u.s buyer and china is somewhat

00:09:51.840 unwilling to sell so that never came together but uh trump says he's poised to expand it

00:09:59.280 and apparently that'll get wrapped in with some of his other trade talks with china so i think china

00:10:07.440 wants to keep it as uh one more thing they can hold over the heads of the u.s because you know

00:10:15.200 one of trump's biggest donors i believe is one of the biggest owners of tick tock

00:10:20.800 so an american guy so i don't see any uh scenario in which trump is going to ban tick tock because he

00:10:30.880 said it worked for him now if you want to know how safe tick tock is you wouldn't have to go back too

00:10:38.640 far to find uh fox news was doing stories about tick tock was you know reprogramming our youth and it was

00:10:47.280 terrible and then suddenly there would be a bunch of tick tock commercials on fox news did anybody

00:10:55.520 notice that and then after i don't know a year or two of tick tock commercials on fox news uh i think

00:11:04.400 it was yesterday i saw they announced that fox news would have its own uh tick tock presence

00:11:10.960 that's that's uh everything you need to know no it's not going to be banned because apparently

00:11:21.040 trump doesn't think it's dangerous to trump because they got him elected um so maybe he doesn't think

00:11:27.840 it's dangerous in general i don't know i don't know but doesn't look like it's going to get banned

00:11:33.840 um however talking about banning uh trump is going to ban or has uh seven countries

00:11:44.960 they'll be banned from entry into the united states now remember he did this once before

00:11:52.720 and he called it a muslim ban and everybody said we're racist racist you can't do that

00:12:00.400 and then he would point out well it's not every muslim country it's the ones that are you know a

00:12:06.320 problem and that didn't make people happy but he's had time to figure out how to do his

00:12:14.400 do his uh leadership a little bit more elegantly and now he just goes by country so he says afghanistan

00:12:23.920 mayanmar chad republic of the congo these are the ones with full uh travel restrictions uh equatorial guinea

00:12:35.600 uh eritrea haiti iran libya somalia sudan and yemen and then there's some with partial restrictions and

00:12:44.560 blah blah blah anyway um part of my theme today is to try to help democrats

00:12:53.600 with uh attracting men no not that way they they know how to attract men uh if they're gay men but

00:13:05.280 take this topic for example do you think that the uh the idea of restricting countries they have

00:13:14.240 military age men and potential terrorists and stuff do you think that's an idea that appeals to

00:13:20.720 men coming from the republican party or does it appeal to women i would argue that women would say

00:13:31.760 hey uh give me my diversity and don't you know don't uh paint all these people with the same brush

00:13:40.080 and let's have some empathy and maybe they need to escape their terrible countries and men would say

00:13:47.520 um shut up ladies this is military it's military it's not really about immigration it's a pure military 0.99

00:13:58.960 decision so if you were a young man and you wanted to be you know you're looking at the two parties 0.70

00:14:08.400 which of the two parties is a little closer to how you feel

00:14:12.480 well i would think that you would also feel that this is a military decision now you wouldn't know

00:14:20.560 the details you know like what is the specific risk from you know equatorial guinea but you would know

00:14:28.080 for sure that if the government banned them that there's some military risk and obviously this is this is

00:14:37.440 going beyond just immigration so it's not about immigration exactly it's about military risk

00:14:44.720 so once again an obvious case where men say oh well you republicans are doing what a man would want

00:14:54.560 you to do protecting the country and then we've got uh over in arizona katie hobbs

00:15:01.360 uh has a vetoed a bill that would have prevented um the well chinese-owned companies from having more than

00:15:17.280 30 percent of land in arizona uh meaning let me say that a different way that uh if a chinese company

00:15:28.000 owned more than 30 percent of a particular piece of land that would be banned because especially

00:15:35.920 if they seem to be near military assets now uh apparently that went through the legislation

00:15:44.480 or legislature in arizona and then uh governor katie hobbs vetoes it now what do you think men would do

00:15:55.120 men would definitely ban chinese chinese ownership of loss of land in their state 0.96

00:16:06.480 because they would see that as a military threat but katie hobbs did not so here again 1.00

00:16:15.440 you see the democrats doing a thing that looks anti-male or at least opposite of what

00:16:22.720 men would want or do or or feel then there's a story about the ukrainian drones

00:16:33.120 you know the story about the uh the gutsy attack by the ukrainians and they had russian truck drivers

00:16:41.840 drive truckloads worth of uh ukrainian drones and deep into russia and then they release them

00:16:50.080 and attack the airfield well did you think that was a bold military attack that was extra successful

00:17:02.240 or did you think that was a publicity thing which was primarily to raise money for more military stuff

00:17:09.920 well we're already getting the uh little trickle that says you know there are some people saying that

00:17:19.120 ukraine really didn't destroy that many airplanes in russia so it was successful but not nearly as

00:17:29.120 successful as they claimed it sounds almost as if they're trying to push some kind of

00:17:36.080 publicity so why would they do that why would they try to act like they're more successful

00:17:44.640 than they really were if that's true well uh let's look at what happened the uk

00:17:54.480 has uh agreed to give a hundred thousand new drones

00:17:58.160 drones to uh ukraine quote after the russian air strike airfield strikes now this is according to

00:18:06.720 newsweek now is that a do you think that's a total coincidence that um that right after this there's

00:18:16.880 this ukrainian claim that they had made great progress with drones

00:18:22.800 that suddenly the uk could approve 100 000 new drones for them i don't know if you look at the whole

00:18:32.080 picture it looks like it's kind of managed sort of a managed information situation as in

00:18:40.960 i don't think you can believe anything that comes down about ukraine

00:18:44.640 um but the one thing he always looked for is will this help them get more weapons yes if they can show

00:18:55.760 that they were super successful using uh drones against russia then it will be way easier for them to 0.89

00:19:04.720 get a whole bunch of new drones from the uk and sure enough that's what's happening

00:19:11.120 well you've probably heard that uh elon musk and president trump are not exactly on the same page

00:19:20.000 on a few things specifically the big beautiful bill the spending bill now uh if you're not familiar with the

00:19:31.920 the budget process in washington you're lucky because it's a mess

00:19:37.440 um this is just one kind of bill it's not the whole budget it's a recession recession thing

00:19:45.600 meaning it's something they can cut uh it's complicated so it's not the entire budget

00:19:52.560 but it does suggest that they're not looking at the kinds of cuts that elon musk and a lot of us would

00:20:00.400 like to see so uh what has elon said about the big beautiful bill he's called it a disgusting abomination

00:20:14.400 and abhorrent an abhorrent package of deficit-fueled uh spending and he said call your senator call your

00:20:23.680 congressman bankrupting america is not okay kill the bill so that doesn't leave much doubt where he's at

00:20:34.160 imagine being elon musk and doing all that work and all that personal sacrifice

00:20:41.200 literally putting his life on the line he had to have you know lots more security etc and then

00:20:49.200 you don't get the cuts you were hoping for now um is it stephen miller or somebody else says oh there's

00:20:58.800 1.6 trillion dollars in cuts do you believe that

00:21:06.320 cuts or is it just that they could have spent more and they didn't are they really cuts

00:21:14.080 because i don't know that they are and are those cuts so for one year or over 10 because 1.6 trillion

00:21:24.480 doesn't sound like it's over one year but you notice they always leave out the 10-year thing

00:21:31.040 because two years from now the budget will have nothing to do with anybody's intention

00:21:38.640 you know two years ago so you can make promises about how you'll cut the budget in the future

00:21:46.720 but you don't actually have to cut it because it's not the future so it does look like there's a little

00:21:53.760 trickery going on here um and i saw on cnn scott jennings was a kind of challenge to

00:22:02.160 essentially you know talk about the difference between musk and trump on the big beautiful

00:22:10.640 bill and i thought i thought jennings did a great job because instead of uh highlighting the differences

00:22:20.000 um he makes the point that the bill is you know right on point with what trump wants

00:22:25.680 but then he also makes the point that you know the country and musk and most of us want big cuts

00:22:33.120 and that the deficit is out of control so it was a very careful very careful scott jennings answer

00:22:43.600 because it it basically gave uh attention to both sides but he didn't suggest a solution because

00:22:53.280 what is the solution i don't know if there is one so that was a good answer

00:23:00.240 um and then apparently there's an issue about uh elon musk had a preference for the head of nasa

00:23:10.640 and it was somebody who had a spacex connection jared eisenman but he was rejected for reasons that are a

00:23:19.760 little unclear to me um and uh that makes elon not too happy and then uh i guess he's also not too happy

00:23:29.760 because the big beautiful bill repeals tax credits for electric vehicles which probably is a gigantic

00:23:40.080 um a gigantic difference to tesla so on one hand

00:23:48.320 it would be awkward if elon musk got a bunch of things in that bill that were specific and good for

00:23:54.960 him you know he got his own nasa guy kept his cuts for electric vehicles which doesn't really sound like

00:24:02.480 a republican thing

00:24:05.840 so i feel like if you were musk how would you feel right now i think you'd feel you did a bunch of work

00:24:14.720 for republicans and then they they kind of took from you the few things that would have been good for

00:24:22.320 your companies which is you know the head of nasa being his guy and uh electric uh credits the tax credits

00:24:33.600 for electric vehicles so i could see why he'd be a little pissed do you think uh elon musk will be able to

00:24:41.520 stop it from being passed i think he might

00:24:45.680 i think he might i don't know we'll watch in other news i find weird um ed martin

00:24:58.560 is uh he's a pardon attorney now did you know there was such a thing as a pardon attorney

00:25:10.320 well i guess we got one the post millennial was talking about this

00:25:14.400 um and uh i guess ed martin is going to look into some of these sketchy biden pardons

00:25:22.560 specifically his family members

00:25:26.320 as well as uh clemency to 37 inmates on death row

00:25:33.360 so but why are we even looking into that it's sort of a weird thing to look into

00:25:39.440 because isn't the very nature of a pardon the thing that everybody doesn't like but

00:25:47.040 you're not supposed to ask questions because it's a you know it's a complete right of the president

00:25:53.680 i don't know i don't love the fact that somebody's looking into pardons

00:26:00.400 i do think the pardons are sketchy

00:26:02.400 but if a president has the you know the total right to do something sketchy and then does

00:26:12.160 i don't know do you investigate that pardons are always sketchy

00:26:17.280 but we'll find out maybe maybe the auto pen was involved that always makes it fun

00:26:24.880 we like it when the auto pen is part of the story

00:26:27.360 well speaking of that uh big beautiful bill uh charlie kirk had a really good post on x

00:26:36.880 showing all the things in the bill that republicans would like and so i spent some time looking down

00:26:43.200 the list and i said to myself wow that's a lot of stuff i like so on one hand um it's very trumpian

00:26:53.360 and it's stuff he promised and uh you have to say that he's he's delivering on those things that are

00:27:01.680 on the list but charlie kirk um is uh sort of involved in a half opinion meaning if you're not

00:27:11.600 talking about the impact on the budget and the deficit it doesn't really matter how many good things

00:27:19.440 are in there because we're all dead that's my take so that's sort of similar to elon musk's yeah you

00:27:28.000 could have 50 great republican things in your bill but if the entire country is bankrupt in a year

00:27:38.240 none of those things help so it doesn't help me to know that it's full of things i would like

00:27:45.760 um it only helps me if you can tell me i'll still be alive in a year well maybe you

00:27:56.720 uh senator mike lee has proposed a constitutional amendment for keeping uh keeping things under

00:28:05.680 control fiscally he said uh that it would automatically oust every member of congress

00:28:12.880 of congress when inflation exceeds three percent now what do you think of that constitutional amendment

00:28:21.840 that whenever inflation exceeds three percent every member of congress gets fired

00:28:30.560 no well first of all i'm not sure congress has full control over inflation if they had a hundred

00:28:40.240 percent control over inflation then i would say well maybe but there are external events that you know

00:28:48.800 influence inflation but on top of that what are the odds we would ever get a constitutional amendment passed

00:28:58.080 in 2025 or 2026 do you think we would ever get a constitutional amendment passed

00:29:07.040 i don't think so i think it would just be partisan and that's enough to kill it

00:29:18.480 well you know for some time now i've been telling you that ai might be overrated and it might reach a plateau

00:29:30.800 and it might not have a direct path to so-called agi or artificial general intelligence i'm going to give you my 0.95

00:29:43.920 my best uh idiots version of what agi is compared to what we have now um and this is stolen from sundar 0.94

00:29:53.760 uh pj um the ceo of google he was talking about waymo and he said uh waymo is you know amazing technology that it can 0.98

00:30:05.760 drive around but he says you could teach a teenager how to drive in 20 hours and that's all the car does

00:30:14.160 now the difference between artificial general intelligence and just a thing that you train to do

00:30:23.120 a specific task like waymo is that we have the technology to make something to a specific set of

00:30:30.880 tasks that has a limited number of you know options but agi would be a general intelligence

00:30:42.240 that could figure stuff out that we hadn't figured out so for example uh you couldn't send an ai

00:30:51.360 that was designed today uh into your cabin in the woods and tell it look at the cabin figure out what

00:31:00.400 work it needs to do then order the parts and then do whatever handyman stuff needs to be done robot

00:31:08.720 now that would be general intelligence because because a human could do that but uh apparently

00:31:17.680 according to sundar and ceo of uh google we don't really have a direct path to that and that's the

00:31:27.760 one everybody's worried about so this is what i've been saying for some time and i was getting a little

00:31:34.000 pushback people were acting like oh no they're they're just gonna make the data centers bigger and

00:31:40.960 bigger until we reach you know general intelligence but i don't think we know what technology could get

00:31:49.120 us to general intelligence it's it's not doing more of what we're doing it would have to be invented

00:31:55.520 so i'll be curious if we can get there all right so the funniest story i probably spent too much time

00:32:08.880 on it is the idea of the democrats trying to attract men and i saw an article in the hill where it was

00:32:19.280 talking about various experts and consultants and they each had their own ideas about why the democrats

00:32:27.280 were not attracting men but i think i've talked about a bunch of them which is trump keeps doing

00:32:34.880 confident things that seem to have military utility that attracts men then you look at the uh the recent

00:32:44.480 uh signups for the military they're way up because trump treats the military with great respect and the

00:32:55.280 way he talks about it the way he funds it makes you think oh that's a respectable place to be do democrats

00:33:02.800 do that no not nearly as much so every time you see anything that would have a male female

00:33:10.880 um energy to it the republicans are doing the right thing not because they're trying to attract men

00:33:20.240 it's just this is the right thing you know closing the borders to countries that we we can't vet the

00:33:27.120 people come in that's really not male or female that's just smart it's just that men would have more

00:33:37.120 appreciation for the the military aspect of that and then they would say to themselves oh here's a country

00:33:44.320 that's serious about protecting itself i should uh maybe look into joining the military because that's a

00:33:52.160 respectable kind of career so sure enough recruitment is way up

00:33:58.960 but here here are some of the things the experts say about uh how the democrats can get back those men

00:34:08.000 they're losing uh one of them is uh let's see here here's some expert who said when you're not talking

00:34:15.920 about the working family you're never going to get those men back somebody named rosha said now let me

00:34:24.080 give you some advice if you'd ever like to be a political consultant i'm going to give you 10 years of

00:34:34.000 political consultant advice in one sentence

00:34:42.000 if you mention working families everybody will think you're a genius that's it every time i see a 1.00

00:34:50.400 democrat explaining why they haven't succeeded they say something like well we're not talking enough

00:34:56.720 about working families to which i say that's all it takes to be a democrat consultant or or the head of

00:35:06.720 the uh entire party all it takes is being able to say this the phrase working families

00:35:13.520 it's so empty all right here's another one um

00:35:23.040 so oh uh we need authenticity and you can't manufacture it in a lab or a war room said rodel molyneau

00:35:34.560 we need authenticity well how do you get authenticity well one way would be to close the borders to

00:35:46.560 dangerous countries and just say that's my policy and to make sure that you're treating the military right

00:35:55.920 right there's no secret to it the things that attract men are pretty obvious to men so you can't get

00:36:06.720 authenticity by pretending to be authentic trump actually did close the border to those countries

00:36:16.240 trump actually does you know confident male things there's no authenticity needed he's just doing what he does

00:36:26.640 all right all right and then there's uh i love this one the the experts say that republicans became

00:36:34.480 better at speaking to men through podcasts god they're they're just so wrong about the podcast

00:36:43.280 i don't think that i don't think that joe rogan and uh theo vaughn were what caused men to be

00:36:53.040 become republicans i think men were leading republican and then there are two podcasters who were

00:37:01.360 compatible with how they were thinking the public so i i'm not so sure that joe rogan is moving the

00:37:11.280 political needle as much as the changes in politics that are happening because of trump

00:37:17.280 are creating some people who maybe are finding joe rogan so maybe they have cause and effect a little

00:37:24.880 backwards there so but i don't think the podcasters are a big part of the story actually i mean they're

00:37:30.960 they're a big part of the media story because they're hugely successful and influential

00:37:38.000 but i don't think they really are what make uh republican men like trump i don't think that's happening

00:37:48.400 not exactly

00:37:51.520 um

00:37:51.840 um and then there's another one who says another consultant they met male voters exactly where they

00:38:00.240 were and we on the other hand had nothing comparable so they really believe that if they improved their

00:38:08.160 podcasting game but didn't change their policies that they would attract men does that sound real to you

00:38:18.480 like the the anti-gun people are just gonna have a you know have a better podcast it doesn't feel like it

00:38:30.080 it doesn't feel like that's gonna work i love the fact that they think it would

00:38:35.280 um and then there's a one consultant um strategist eddie vale who said one pretty simple and obvious answer

00:38:46.720 if you want uh blue colored men and women to support you go hang out with them and their unions

00:38:54.320 is that what trump did did trump go hang out with the blue colored men and their unions no

00:39:03.760 no that's not going to work but you can hang out with them all you want i don't i don't think that's

00:39:10.800 going to make a difference they're going to care about you know the defense of the country

00:39:16.000 and the closed borders are going to care about tariffs but they're not going to care if you

00:39:20.960 you're not going to learn anything they're hanging out with them

00:39:25.760 um and then uh and then veil quipped that democrats were still in the hey let's have another conference

00:39:35.360 phase of the rebuilding effort so they genuinely do believe the democrats too

00:39:42.320 there's a messaging problem as long as they think that they only have a messaging problem

00:39:48.720 and not a candidate problem or a policy problem they don't have any path there's no path to fixing it

00:39:57.200 meanwhile uh schumer i was talking about the big beautiful bill but he calls it

00:40:04.400 cleverly now look at look how clever this is he calls the big beautiful bill

00:40:12.000 well we're all going to die act death by a thousand paper cuts 0.65

00:40:20.720 so chuck schumer and here's what we're going to do we're going to call it the 0.96

00:40:26.400 the well we're all going to die act oh my god he was so lame the the best they could come up with

00:40:37.600 was changing the name of the act and then telling people that for a variety of technical reasons

00:40:44.480 that he calls a thousand paper cuts it will deny people the benefits who should have them

00:40:49.760 they are lost democrats are absolutely lost and then uh what about hakeem jeffries

00:41:01.440 so democratic leader hakeem jeffries he's calling to unmask ice agents

00:41:10.400 literally to name them so it becomes more dangerous to deport the dangerous people

00:41:16.000 people now is that a male or a female uh thing to do well i would say a male would want to keep the

00:41:27.600 bad people out of the country so they would support ice and they would support ice staying safe while

00:41:34.160 they do it but now one of the two leaders of the party wants to unmask literally unmask

00:41:43.680 the ice agents and tell everybody who they are

00:41:50.400 oh my god that is so not male uh bright bar news has that story so do you see the pattern the pattern

00:42:01.920 is is what they do it's not how they talk about it it's not their podcasters it's their policies

00:42:11.040 and and then you look at their their main guy if you look at trump you see this you know confident

00:42:19.200 straight lace you know guy who can who will take somebody on a world leader take him on in the white

00:42:26.320 house uh we'll do any argument we'll take any question and put you down and then you compare it to

00:42:33.360 chuck schumer it's like yeah yeah chuck shower i'm a penguin yeah right yeah how are those even similar

00:42:45.280 one of them appeals to men in general and the other one just looks like some kind of a penguin with

00:42:51.360 glasses and you you don't even know what to think about it anyway so that ladies and gentlemen

00:43:03.200 is all i had to talk about today i think it's just enough time i got plenty of things to do today so

00:43:10.160 i gotta go run and do them and thanks everybody for uh letting me take yesterday off yesterday was

00:43:18.720 kind of eventful but uh i'm back if it looks like my neck is turned it's because i slept on it wrong and

00:43:28.240 hurts like crazy but uh other than that everything's fine and uh i'm gonna say hi to the

00:43:36.080 locals people privately but the rest of you thanks for joining we'll see you same time next well next 24

00:43:44.880 hours i guess

00:44:06.080 morning

00:44:16.880 morning

00:44:23.760 morning

00:44:36.080 Thank you.

00:45:06.080 Thank you.

00:45:36.080 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 05, 2025

Episode 2859 CWSA 06⧸05⧸25

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript