Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 02, 2025


Episode 2885 CWSA 07⧸02⧸25


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 33 minutes

Words per Minute

127.54575

Word Count

11,897

Sentence Count

14

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

In this week's episode of The Top 10, the boys discuss the current state of the stock market, the future of the WNBA and whether or not we should be watching women's basketball in the summer. We also discuss what it's like to live in a world where 25% of the public gets every survey question wrong.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 come on in yeah it's been a while come on in and grab a seat i'll uh i'll check the stocks for you
00:00:12.480 um the s p is flat tesla is up bitcoin is up all right well let me get the comments working
00:00:26.880 and then we got a show for you you'll love it all right there we go
00:00:38.240 good morning everyone and welcome to the highlight of human civilization civilization
00:00:58.400 yeah it's probably the best time you'll ever have in your life but if you'd like to take a chance of
00:01:05.120 taking it to levels that no one can even understand with their tiny shiny human brains
00:01:12.560 well for that all you need is a cup or mug or glass a tankard shells just tie in a canteen jug or a
00:01:18.880 flask a vessel of eight kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for
00:01:25.600 the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day thing that makes everything better it's called
00:01:31.440 the simultaneous sip and it happens now go
00:01:41.680 excellent
00:01:45.680 well
00:01:48.080 i wonder if there's any science that they wasted their money on oh yeah here's some um
00:01:58.800 there's a study in penis
00:02:03.680 p-n-a-s is the acronym for this uh publication and i don't know how you would pronounce that acronym
00:02:12.560 p-n-a-s other than penis so in the prestigious penis
00:02:20.000 there's a study that says that if you get enough sleep you're more likely to be active and visit to be
00:02:30.160 physically active the next day can you believe it
00:02:34.000 uh what are the odds well maybe they should have asked me first scott we're thinking about spending
00:02:44.240 a million dollars to do a survey to find out or a study if getting enough sleep helps you be
00:02:52.640 physically active the next day and i would have said save your money save your money for half of that
00:03:00.320 i'll give you the answer yes
00:03:04.480 well according to the city university of london uh one in four young adults are living with mental health
00:03:12.640 conditions um one in four now you know how i always make fun of surveys and i always tell you
00:03:23.200 um it seems like 25 of the public gets every survey question wrong you know if you asked is it good for
00:03:32.480 people to eat food 25 would say oh i don't think so i don't think you should eat food so it doesn't
00:03:41.360 matter what the question is 25 will be on the wrong end of every question but about one in four young
00:03:51.920 people have mental health conditions do you think that's the same people because i hope it is
00:03:59.520 because if we've got 25 of the public is just stupid and 25 is mentally ill that's that's no world i want
00:04:11.760 to live in but i think i do i think maybe it's not the same people
00:04:19.200 well i have a confession uh i would like to throw myself on the mercy of the court
00:04:25.920 um because i know this won't be popular but lately because there's not much on tv in the summer
00:04:35.520 and i've been spending a lot of time in front of it because i'm not as active as i used to speak
00:04:42.320 um i've started to enjoy women's basketball i know i know you you can give me all your insults
00:04:54.320 but when was the last time you actually watched a wnba game so there's a couple of things i like about it
00:05:04.160 number one men's basketball has turned into garbage because it's nothing but the three-point shots and
00:05:11.760 and then seeing which which fell the referees want to call when i'm watching men's basketball
00:05:19.040 all i i feel like the only thing i'm watching is the referees deciding when to call a foul because
00:05:27.440 there's a foul on every play multiple players all the time there's nothing but non-stop fouling
00:05:36.560 and so watching seven foot guys do free throws it's just not fun and and it starts looking like
00:05:46.640 every player looks like every other player you know not physically but the way they play
00:05:53.520 so you turn on wnba and there are two things that they do right that makes me like it one is
00:06:03.760 that they don't play good defense
00:06:07.360 you know relative to what the men do when the men are playing hard defense you know especially like
00:06:12.320 a playoff game they're just smothering the other side and fouling them every second there's just no
00:06:18.160 fun to watch but the women you know give the other women a little extra space until they get you know
00:06:25.360 really close to the basket so there is more scoring and less fouling it looks like but the other thing
00:06:33.520 they do right which is kind of funny is they have a multi-colored basketball
00:06:38.560 basketball so it's two or three colors i'm not sure what it is but it's a colorful basketball
00:06:46.320 as opposed to the men's which is just one color and what what happens is when the women shoot
00:06:53.200 especially the three-point shots you can see the uh the rotation of the ball and the rotation of the ball
00:07:02.560 as it's heading toward the basket makes me happy because they're really good shooters
00:07:09.920 have almost this perfectly designed backwards um rotation so as soon as it leaves their hand
00:07:18.640 you say to yourself oh it looks like they you know had a good handle on that one so it's actually more fun
00:07:24.320 so i've been enjoying it will it work for you probably not but that's my confession um the dalai lama
00:07:36.160 as you know is very old he's uh he's about 90 now and he's planning to reincarnate because that's what your
00:07:44.640 dalai lamas do uh but he wants to make one thing clear it's not up to china who his reincarnation is
00:07:54.080 so china has already claimed that only they will be the ones to judge who the new dalai lama is
00:08:02.560 now the political part of that is that you know china wants to dominate tibet and so they don't want a
00:08:10.480 new dalai lama who's too popular or too political so they want to they want to pick their own
00:08:17.280 but the dalai lama says no no china cannot pick my reincarnation um he he wants to say that only his
00:08:28.480 trust can i don't know what that means so i guess there's some process where the tibetans
00:08:35.360 pick their own reincarnation for the dalai lama i don't know but uh i want to get in on this
00:08:44.960 um can i also designate who picks my reincarnation
00:08:50.080 or is this limited only to the dalai lama because i kind of like where this is heading i'd like to put
00:08:57.600 it in my my estate plan that there's a committee committee of five people that would get to decide
00:09:06.800 who my reincarnation is which to me would be hilarious especially if my reincarnation didn't
00:09:15.200 want the job well looks like you're the new scott adams what i don't want to be the new scott adams
00:09:24.720 well i'm sorry the reincarnation committee has chosen you you're the new one as i uh quote by zuby
00:09:34.480 this morning on x that i like he said uh people who think life is a zero-sum game are dangerous to be
00:09:42.640 around do you know who thinks that socialists do you know who else thinks that the people who chant
00:10:01.040 death to america now i'm no geopolitical expert but it seems to me that if you're chanting death
00:10:10.320 to america you're not thinking of a win-win scenario all right well you'll you'll die
00:10:18.000 and then we'll do great so we're both winners no no no i think you should stay away from people who
00:10:26.800 think life is a zero-sum game some would say that i got cancelled for saying something very similar
00:10:35.200 but that would be unfair um well jerome powell uh was giving a talk at some event and he was saying
00:10:45.360 that the uh the economy is looking pretty good inflation's close to two percent core inflation
00:10:52.720 2.7 unemployment 4.2 not terrible numbers you know they're not the best but they're not bad the economy's
00:11:02.320 looking good and then separately other experts are saying that the stock market is at all-time high i
00:11:11.600 guess and uh that can only be because the market has sort of priced in the uncertainty over tariffs
00:11:20.560 and by priced in i mean is treating it like it's no price at all basically uh so that's what's happening
00:11:29.680 um and uh powell says he expects to see higher inflation over the summer why would that be is that
00:11:38.960 because he thinks the tariffs will kick in and that'll create some some inflation we haven't seen yet
00:11:45.840 maybe maybe uh what does president trump think about that well he called uh jerome powell a quote moron
00:12:00.800 how would you like to wake up every day and the and the most important person in the world the
00:12:06.320 president of the united states is coming up with brand new insults for you
00:12:11.680 uh that must be weird anyway the uh the p diddy verdict uh we're getting close
00:12:24.400 uh apparently of the multiple counts there was one that the jury could not decide on
00:12:30.560 and that was the big one the rico cons you know racketeering conspiracy one
00:12:35.680 and the judge is apparently going to send her back to try to get a unanimous decision now we assume
00:12:45.040 that the holdouts are probably the ones who don't want to convict but i don't know that we know that
00:12:53.840 i think it's just an assumption because um it looks like they have a decision on sex trafficking
00:13:02.720 and on the charge of trafficking to engage in prostitution two counts apiece and those decisions have been made
00:13:13.760 which i think we assume means guilty right but we don't know for sure so uh trey gowdy was explaining on
00:13:23.360 fox news yesterday that uh trying to get a rico conviction is really really hard because juries don't
00:13:31.840 fully understand all the predicates and the nuance of that law but it's easier to say um did you transport
00:13:42.720 somebody for sex you know it's more of a yes no situation so i didn't realize this but um the diddy defense
00:13:52.160 didn't put on any uh any witnesses now that presumably means that they were depending on the prosecution not
00:14:03.840 making the case which um sort of looks like you know maybe they made the right the wrong play but i doubt
00:14:13.760 there were uh there were many witnesses that would kind of say he was innocent i don't know but
00:14:21.840 uh diddy's defense was basically that everything was um voluntary and you know just good fun among
00:14:31.280 adults i don't think any of you think that's true but we'll see i would say the odds are that
00:14:39.840 diddy is going to spend at least 10 years in jail um we'll see cbs allegedly has settled the lawsuit
00:14:50.160 that trump had against them for their uh alleged um inappropriate edits of kamala harris back in
00:14:59.200 october of last year and as you know they edited for conciseness and clarity that's what cbs would say
00:15:08.560 and what trump would say is they made her dumb answer look like it wasn't so dumb which is interfering with
00:15:15.440 the election and uh he sued now i feel like lawyers would say that he never would have prevailed in this
00:15:26.400 lawsuit except that the entity paramount is trying to get government approval for a big merger
00:15:35.360 and that might be on hold so i don't know if this is a good indication of what the law you know is or
00:15:45.040 should be or what justice is but trump won 16 million dollars it looks like assuming that that gets finalized
00:15:54.400 now that's on top of you might remember abc news settled with trump for 15 million dollars that went to the
00:16:03.520 trump presidential library for their their statements that he considered defamatory and i believe that
00:16:11.920 paramount has made the same offer that the money will not go to trump it will go to his library
00:16:18.000 so apparently trump found a way to fund his his presidential library which is suing the fake news
00:16:27.920 that have been the bane of his existence for 10 years and he's making the fake news pay for his
00:16:34.640 presidential library now on one hand you might say to yourself oh well they they found a clever way
00:16:45.280 to not pay trump any money but trump doesn't really need the money does he i mean not these amounts but he
00:16:54.800 definitely needs money for his presidential library so if he asked me that's like winning twice
00:17:02.320 twice once is winning the lawsuit but twice is getting your your fake news enemies to pay for your
00:17:10.880 presidential library that will last forever now that's that's funny i mean that's just good stuff
00:17:20.000 and uh you might remember that meta paid uh reportedly 25 million dollars to settle the trump lawsuit
00:17:27.520 um over suspending um over suspending him um when they had him suspended on facebook so that would and
00:17:36.720 i don't think that 25 million went to the presidential library but it'd be funnier if it did it's just that
00:17:45.040 you know facebook is not exactly the fake news it's just funnier if the fake news
00:17:50.640 pays for his library to me that's just just perfect
00:17:57.360 so i've got a observation
00:18:01.360 and maybe you can add to this but if you notice that the uh the anti-trump press
00:18:09.920 um has started to use his his branding and his nicknames
00:18:13.360 so even when cnn or msnbc talk about the legislation they also call it the big beautiful bill
00:18:23.520 although its name has now changed because i think schuber introduced a name change so it's not
00:18:30.480 technically one big beautiful bill that's what it was um but is it my imagination
00:18:39.760 or did trump get everybody to finally just surrender to his branding ideas and that when he brands
00:18:47.360 something everybody just uses his nickname and they they don't they don't push back too hard
00:18:55.280 anymore it's like all right it's a big beautiful bill likewise uh alligator alcatraz
00:19:02.480 now that's not one that trump invented he just sort of adopted it and boosted it but it's not my
00:19:10.640 imagination that cnn and msnbc also call it alligator alcatraz right so they've sort of accepted that
00:19:19.920 branding as well um and then of course he's calling uh zoran mamdani the guy running for mayor in new
00:19:28.720 york communist um i think so far mostly just the right is adopting that and then he he calls powell
00:19:39.440 too late is that what he calls powell jerome powell the fed chair too late powell i don't think that
00:19:47.600 one's quite stuck yet but it does feel to me that trump's branding is so strong that even the
00:19:55.920 the you know even the news that you think is fake news just sort of accepts it at this point
00:20:04.480 um msabc was looking at some article from playbook publication playbook and was wondering if the
00:20:15.680 alligator alcatraz play by the republicans is just a trap to paint democrats as the open border party
00:20:26.240 what do you think do you think alligator alcatraz is by design so not accidentally but is it by design
00:20:37.920 that the republicans really want the the critics to argue against deportations basically or against
00:20:48.960 strong borders i don't know that that's intentionally what they're doing but it that's what's happening
00:20:58.240 but but to me it's more of a trap that they set for themselves
00:21:01.360 is it really the republicans setting the trap when the democrats have promoted open borders
00:21:11.040 you know that they typically don't say they're promoting open borders
00:21:15.520 but everybody can see it so i would say it's more likely that the democrats created their own trap
00:21:23.680 and then fell into their own trap which is being against border security
00:21:31.600 anyway um joy reed predictably you know the fired ex-host of msnbc joy reed
00:21:40.080 um she says that trump has constructed quote concentration camps to deport brown people
00:21:50.960 do you think that'll stick it might
00:21:54.800 i could easily imagine other people saying i told you he was gonna form concentration camps for brown
00:22:02.160 people and there it is but of course it's really just a convenience for stuff they were doing anyway which
00:22:09.600 is deporting they're they're not planning that people will stay there
00:22:16.080 it's sort of where they go while they're waiting to be deported
00:22:20.080 i'm chris hadfield i'm an astronaut an author a citizen of planet earth join me for a six-part
00:22:26.960 journey into the systems that power the world real conversations with real people who are shaping the
00:22:34.000 future of energy no politics no empty talk just solutions focused conversations on the challenges
00:22:41.840 we must overcome and the possibilities that lie ahead this is on energy listen wherever you get your podcasts
00:22:50.960 um so cnn
00:22:52.960 uh their host said that uh the end of usa id the program that doge targeted for elimination and now
00:23:04.480 um got rolled into the state department so rubio is keeping you know some of its functions but not most of it
00:23:12.960 but cnn is talking about it as though it will lead to the death of 14 million people
00:23:22.720 because 14 million people will die without the usa id funding do you believe that
00:23:30.880 well they also had former usa id administrator samantha power who's now fired and she says that
00:23:39.680 uh it could kill 12 million people so somewhere between 12 and 14 million people will be killed
00:23:50.080 by this trump policy to decrease the usa id funding um what do you think of that
00:23:59.760 and they claim that one of the entities alone saved 25 million lives and that they will stop selling
00:24:08.080 that they will no longer be saving 25 million people because of funding well let me put the dilbert filter on
00:24:17.840 this so this is a perfect situation that you might see in a dilbert comic where the staff member or the
00:24:27.120 manager claims that they had saved a bunch of money and then if something changes even though it might be made
00:24:35.680 up in hyperbole like oh that change means that we'll lose all that money or people will die
00:24:43.360 do you think do you think that the 14 million people was documented so well that we could tell
00:24:52.880 that when the funding got cut that 14 million people started dropping dead within 12 months
00:24:58.800 does it does it does it seem likely that the people who are tracking that stuff could tell you who is going to die
00:25:08.960 it doesn't seem super likely to me but um did you know here's some context for you
00:25:20.160 did you know at least the unusual whales is reporting this on x that uh the g7 countries you know the big
00:25:29.120 industrial countries the g7 um collectively are cutting globally by 28 percent for the coming year
00:25:38.560 now that's according to axios so does that seem like the entire world is going to be killing 14 million a
00:25:48.640 piece so if the u.s doing its cuts um if the u.s is going to be responsible for killing
00:25:58.480 14 million people but the entire g7 is also massively reducing their global aid don't they also kill
00:26:08.240 a certain number themselves so would you say it's 14 million times seven
00:26:14.480 or you know maybe their their funding was not as big but uh so that would very quickly get you to a
00:26:21.600 a number like a hundred million people
00:26:25.200 are dying because of cuts and foreign aid does that sound even a little bit true to you
00:26:32.480 do you believe that that you know five years from now we'll look back and say well
00:26:37.840 a hundred million people died because the g7 cut their global aid it doesn't seem likely to me
00:26:47.200 but let me give you a little additional con context i went to grok the ai and i said how many people in
00:26:56.400 the world are currently starving as in not enough food you know daily um what do you think the answer
00:27:06.720 is the number of people in the world today who don't have enough food which would suggest they also
00:27:13.520 don't have enough health care and don't have clean water and all the rest the answer is 733 million
00:27:23.280 did you know that 733 million so i would like to add the following horrible thoughts are you ready for
00:27:34.240 horrible thoughts things you're not supposed to say in public that's my specialty
00:27:42.320 all right here's something you're not supposed to say in public happiness depends
00:27:49.120 happiness depends on not knowing too much about the people you could have saved
00:27:56.800 if you were willing to make yourself less happy doing it
00:27:59.440 and there's no way around it there's no way around it the only way you can pursue happiness
00:28:10.000 is by consciously ignoring all the people who will die 14 million of them maybe 100 million
00:28:20.240 they will die unless you stop your enjoyment and give them all your extra money
00:28:26.400 money now does anybody say that out loud no you've got this whole industry of people
00:28:35.440 you know which i'm part of trying to tell people how to be happy in their lives but they conveniently
00:28:42.240 conveniently they all leave out this most important variable you have to consciously ignore
00:28:51.120 the people who are suffering that you could have helped you know even in your small way you could have
00:28:57.840 helped them but you didn't instead you decided to live your own life and you know make sure your
00:29:05.440 kids have everything they need and all that so that's the first thing
00:29:09.520 are you ready for the even more controversial second thing can you handle this it's gonna get worse
00:29:21.200 all right here it is did you know that if you were to rank the countries by economics you know the ones
00:29:30.320 that are making the most money us and european countries etc and then you were to rank them by
00:29:38.320 reproductive success meaning are you making enough children to replace yourself plus extra you would find that those are the opposite
00:29:50.480 you would find that the people who are reproducing at the highest rates
00:29:55.200 are almost entirely the countries that need our aid
00:30:00.080 let me say that again the countries that have the highest fertility rate and are making the most children
00:30:10.320 are the same countries that need our help and how do we afford helping
00:30:17.680 africa and other places how do we afford that
00:30:20.480 we afford it by reducing our own reproductive um situation the reason the reason that americans and
00:30:33.040 europeans can afford to buy food is because they don't have 10 kids if if we all had 10 kids how much money could we give
00:30:44.640 to other countries for foreign aid none none so it's not a question of uh we have everything we want
00:30:54.880 so we'll give a little extra to the countries that need it because they're suffering we are literally
00:31:01.600 deciding to have fewer children so that we can afford to pay the people who are having more children
00:31:08.560 we're literally funding our own future destruction
00:31:15.040 about that do you ever think of it that way we we always look at the money
00:31:20.720 where we track the number of people who are starving or the number of people who maybe were saved
00:31:25.840 but shouldn't we be tracking reproduction because the countries that are reproducing the most
00:31:33.520 are winning that's winning if you have the most children and your your country no matter how poor
00:31:43.600 ends up with the most extra people at the end of the year and and they convince some soccer country
00:31:50.800 that they could guilt them into paying to not have their own children because you can't afford it
00:31:57.600 but to pay a lot extra so that other people can have more children
00:32:02.960 that's a frame isn't it
00:32:07.600 aren't you glad you watched today because that's the most provocative thing you'll hear today
00:32:13.840 anywhere that we should be measuring reproductive success
00:32:18.560 that's the ultimate goal of of every species for every species the ultimate
00:32:26.640 top level goal is the highest level of reproduction because if you don't do that
00:32:34.240 somebody's gonna produce you and eventually conquer you and you know so that's where it's heading
00:32:41.120 so we have to create the fiscal and it's worse than that it's not that you're just it's worse than that
00:32:49.920 remember i i said that um the g7 countries would have to give up their own reproductive
00:32:57.840 potential so they had enough money to pay the people who were having tons of babies
00:33:03.200 is worse than that we're not just giving up our current expensing we're driving up our debt to the
00:33:11.280 point where we're literally destroying our own civilization because we can't pay the debt so we're not just
00:33:19.120 giving our extra to other countries that have higher reproductive rates
00:33:24.000 we're guaranteeing the destruction of our entire civilization to help fund other countries have more babies
00:33:34.560 that's actually happening nobody talks about it that way right we always we always measure some
00:33:40.560 other variables but those are the big ones all right
00:33:44.880 well the uh conversation about medicaid cuts and the big beautiful bill um seems to come down to
00:33:55.680 the democrats are claiming that the cuts will kick off kick people off the program so they won't have
00:34:03.280 medical coverage whereas the republicans are saying no it's only tightening the requirements it's getting
00:34:12.960 people who should not be having it off there you know undocumented people and getting the lazy people
00:34:20.400 who should be working a job off the couch and so that they could qualify for it um i don't know that
00:34:27.600 either of those is exactly the right frame because it's probably something in between but i'll tell you
00:34:33.920 what you can't do you cannot forever increase programs where you're transferring money from one group to another
00:34:42.960 so will it be a giant hardship for some people who are getting medicaid and now they won't
00:34:50.960 probably it will be a giant hardship but again is that your problem
00:34:59.440 why is it why is it my problem why do i have to pay for people i don't know and who are not working
00:35:07.760 or not citizens why why do i have to pay for them so i would love them to do well but is it my job
00:35:19.200 is it my job to take care of the people who can't get off the couch or here illegally i don't know i'd
00:35:26.320 say no i'd say that's not my job and i don't feel guilty about that
00:35:30.640 bank more encores when you switch to a scotia bank banking package
00:35:39.280 learn more at scotiabank.com slash banking packages conditions apply scotia bank you're richer than you
00:35:46.000 think well cnn as biased as they might be i feel like they are um moving toward the middle
00:35:57.520 you know that that was their ambition at least the management's ambition was to try to move toward
00:36:04.160 the middle um and i'm seeing small signals maybe bigger bigger than small that they're actually trying
00:36:12.160 to do that for example um cnn had jamie raskin on and i think it was uh casey hunt was the uh the host
00:36:23.920 police and he was uh he was complaining about all the bad things in the big beautiful bill
00:36:30.720 so raskin is their designated liar he's he's the one they bring on the democrats he's he's a democrat
00:36:38.640 that will say the thing that would just be too embarrassing for regular people to say
00:36:43.600 he would just tell any ridiculous lie in public he's one of several people that they use for that
00:36:51.400 so after he had been maligning the big beautiful bill casey hunt said is there anything is there
00:36:59.640 anything in this bill that you would support and he's like oh you know changes the subject and then she
00:37:08.680 gives him a specific she goes uh what about uh no tax on tips now suppose you're the prominent
00:37:18.440 designated liar for the democrats and cnn asks you if you are okay with not taxing tips
00:37:29.240 what exactly is a democrat supposed to say since the you know their big the complaints about the
00:37:35.800 democrats is that they stopped supporting the working people well the people who work for tips
00:37:41.800 are the working people it's exactly the people that they haven't been serving and it's the reason for
00:37:49.320 their demise um and so what did jamie raskin say did he support the no taxes and tips and he said
00:38:00.520 i'm doing a long pause because he did a long pause
00:38:08.120 uh i don't know i haven't looked at it
00:38:13.480 i haven't looked at it i just told you what it is it's no tax on tips what part of that do you not
00:38:21.320 understand i haven't looked at it
00:38:23.800 now that was a weak ass answer but it's not about jamie raskin who can be
00:38:31.640 dependent on to lie about every topic that's just sort of what he does
00:38:37.640 but do you think do you think cnn would have asked that question during trump's first term
00:38:46.280 because it was a really good question the good question was it's got 25 topics in it or more
00:38:52.360 the bill is there anything you think is reasonable that is a darn good middle of the road
00:39:01.000 serves the viewers kind of question so that's my first example where it looked like cnn was trying
00:39:08.840 to find you know this middle unbiased reporting place but um we also talked the other day about
00:39:18.520 burke khanish on cnn who you know somewhat um i guess many of you would have been surprised by it but
00:39:27.800 i wasn't they gave a fairly uncritical objective um analysis of trump having an amazing few weeks
00:39:39.320 and he didn't he didn't uh try to say but you know he's also hitler he just said that trump had an
00:39:45.880 amazing successful two weeks would you have seen that during his first term you know you could argue
00:39:53.560 he didn't have two weeks like that but i don't know maybe from spur khanish um and then harry enton
00:40:00.360 their data guy the guy who talks about the latest polling he i won't say he's pro trump but when the
00:40:08.520 numbers go pro trump which by the way they did recently he reports it enthusiastically so he doesn't
00:40:17.960 say well for a hitler we don't know why he's so popular he just uncritically tells you that the polling
00:40:28.440 looks really good so he was uh harry enton was just talking about how uh trump according to the latest
00:40:35.720 survey is the most beloved the most loved republican president in all of history and he beat ronald reagan
00:40:45.640 let me say that again cnn harry enton reported enthusiastically that trump is the most loved
00:40:55.080 republican president in history now obviously mostly loved by republicans but still he beat reagan
00:41:05.720 and they they reported that without again without saying stuff like well i don't know why so many
00:41:12.840 people like hillary they simply reported that his popularity is through the roof at the moment
00:41:21.160 and then all of you know that scott jennings is uh getting a lot of airtime on cnn and does an unusually
00:41:29.160 you know great job of presenting the other side so um do you remember when uh steve cortez was in that role i
00:41:41.080 would say in cnn and then steve cortez got sort of pushed out by cnn do you know why steve cortez got
00:41:49.560 uh pushed out of cnn because he was doing too good of a job i think he was just a little bit too good
00:41:58.440 and he was especially attacking him on the um fine people hoax you know the charlottesville
00:42:05.240 fine people hoax so they they couldn't handle steve cortez but at the moment scott jennings is doing
00:42:13.080 uh a similarly amazing job um and they seem to be happy with that at least you know from what we can
00:42:21.480 observe so see then still biased we assume but uh there are a number of bright spots in the show and uh
00:42:33.400 keep an eye on that
00:42:34.280 well um i don't know about your town but uh i got a little inside um scoop on my town
00:42:45.400 and apparently the people who live and work around here who are not documented citizens of this country
00:42:54.680 have definitely changed their routines so it used to be that if you were here and you were undocumented
00:43:02.040 you would just sort of live your life like everyone else if you wanted to go someplace you went
00:43:07.320 someplace you go to work etc but i am hearing uh that the undocumented people are only going out of their
00:43:17.800 house if they have to so that would include going to work but they're not spending a lot of time outside
00:43:24.360 the house because of the uh ice news is is really putting a chill on on the risk so the one thing i was
00:43:36.520 not really expecting is that trump has done so well on the border closing and ice has done so well
00:43:44.520 in promoting what they're doing that uh the undocumented people are feeling a lot of pressure
00:43:51.800 and they don't want to you know be driving a car and run a run a stop sign because they'd be shipped back
00:44:00.200 to be shipped over to alligator alcatraz so the uh the lifestyle of the people who are here who are not
00:44:09.320 citizens is really compacted and i would bet that that's the same where you are now i'm not saying that's
00:44:19.400 good or bad you can put your own judgment on it i will tell you that if you don't know anybody in that
00:44:27.320 community it's a lot easier to be you know cold and calculated and saying we're going to ship you back
00:44:34.680 if you do you probably have had the feeling that many of us had at least in california this is true
00:44:42.520 that we really like them they're in many cases they're just tremendous people and they're just
00:44:49.560 working hard trying to improve their life and you you can find a lot to relate relate um but whether or
00:44:57.880 not they're awesome people um this gets back to my earlier comment at what point am i morally obligated
00:45:06.760 to transfer my wealth to other people because they're awesome and they are awesome and i i do have genuine
00:45:13.720 empathy for the people who are being affected by this it's doesn't look fun and going back to their
00:45:20.840 home country doesn't look like a bargain but is it my job to keep all of them alive and you know bring more
00:45:30.840 in i'd say no so this gets back to the only way you can live a happy life is by intentionally ignoring
00:45:41.640 the suffering of you know a billion other people a billion you have to ignore a billion people struggling
00:45:50.600 otherwise you can't be happy yourself there's no way to get there all right so that may be the
00:45:57.640 same where you live um borders our uh tom holman uh according to the gateway pundit um he said that
00:46:09.800 the goj is looking into aoc because she was employing an illegal alien on her staff and she was helping
00:46:18.840 um undocumented um undocumented illegal people evade ice so apparently the accusation or allegation
00:46:28.200 is that uh she was publicly telling people how to avoid getting picked up by ice which i believe would
00:46:35.800 be interfering with law enforcement and a crime and if she knowingly was hiring an illegal alien or employing
00:46:45.320 on her staff that must be some kind of a crime i don't know what but i'll tell you um democrats might
00:46:54.760 be feeling like it was a mistake to lawfare president trump for years because if he won
00:47:04.440 he's gonna lawfare the shit out of them in revenge now he doesn't have to say it's revenge
00:47:11.240 he can just say no one is above the law something they introduced no one's above the law so i have
00:47:21.240 again mixed feelings in a normal world um i'm not sure that aoc has gone far enough that you know putting
00:47:30.920 her in jail would make sense to me i mean i get i get what the problem is i understand the allegations
00:47:37.960 but i'm not sure that was you know worth too much resource to go after it but these days because the
00:47:47.080 democrats were so lawfare wild against trump if trump's administration decides to go a little bit hard
00:47:55.720 on lawfare against the prominent members i feel like they brought that on themselves
00:48:02.680 it feels like again it's not a case as a republican setting a trap for the democrats this would be a
00:48:11.160 trap that the democrats set for themselves so the way they set it for themselves is by going too far
00:48:19.240 with the lawfare against trump which probably helped him get elected and then it pretty much guaranteed
00:48:27.560 that he wasn't going to be generous when it came to looking at their own legal problems
00:48:33.640 so was that a trap that the republicans set no that was a trap that the democrats fully created on their
00:48:42.200 own and they're getting the somewhat obvious outcome of all that so we'll see where that goes i don't think
00:48:51.400 aoc's going to jail seems unlikely but the fact that they're even investigating it
00:48:58.360 that should scare all right uh so the big beautiful bill was passed by the senate but because of our
00:49:06.040 weird lawmaking process it has to go back to the house the house which passed the original version and now
00:49:14.840 they're going to look at the modified greatly modified version that comes out of the senate and they have to vote
00:49:21.080 again whether they accept the senate's modifications now apparently some of those modifications were pretty big
00:49:31.080 and not every member of the house republicans are going to be for it they might have to be coerced
00:49:40.680 but russ vote who's part of the trump administration and budgets especially
00:49:50.120 he says that part of the plan is to explain to people especially the house who has to approve the
00:49:57.240 big beautiful bill to explain the longer term plan to reduce the deficit so i feel like he's sort of
00:50:05.960 accepting that this one the big beautiful bill might not be a deficit fix strategy at all although there's you
00:50:15.640 know disagreement about whether it will i think uh scott besant is saying that it will improve the economy
00:50:25.080 the big beautiful bill will it'll uh goose the economy so much that we'll make more money and receipts for
00:50:33.560 the irs then uh if we didn't do it and therefore it would be reducing the deficit do you believe it
00:50:43.160 well i don't think any of us understand what's in that big beautiful bill
00:50:47.560 so maybe but i wouldn't bet my life on it however um if they make the argument um you know it sounds
00:51:00.280 like where russ vote is coming from but i don't want to put words in his mouth but what it sounds like
00:51:07.240 is that he thinks the best way to sell the big beautiful bill would be to sort of acknowledge
00:51:13.080 that that's not where the big deficit reduction is going to come from but rather it's just a bunch
00:51:18.600 of stuff republicans want and you know we'd be happy or republicans would be happy if they got it
00:51:27.080 so that might be a good approach but uh scott besant is saying directly that it should make a big
00:51:33.880 difference in reducing the budget or reducing the deficit so you can pick either one of those and
00:51:40.840 it would give you a reason to be for it i don't know i'm not sure i buy any of that but that would
00:51:48.440 be the argument um apparently uh speaker johnson says that the house will vote on it maybe thursday
00:51:57.080 so they're still rushing to try to get it done by the fourth of july but um you've got a number of
00:52:04.360 people who are going to be working against it so marjorie taylor green thinks it's gonna
00:52:10.280 bust the budget um and she she wasn't happy with the bill um and the ogles from tennessee he called
00:52:22.680 the senate bill a dud that quote guts key trump provisions i don't know which ones he was referring
00:52:29.640 to chip roy of texas um he's not happy about the bill's treatment of clean energy tax credits he would
00:52:39.000 like that to be more aggressive he says it's a it's a deal killer um if they don't do that then
00:52:47.400 uh representative ralph norman he said they should send it back to the senate and leave town
00:52:54.760 uh representative uh validao california said in a social media post i've been clear from the start that i
00:53:03.320 will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to medicaid so there are at
00:53:09.560 least six republican knows um at this point um but here's what's interesting according to me
00:53:22.440 why would any republican vote for the bill either in the senate or the house
00:53:27.880 because it feels like everybody's a little bit unhappy with it they have different reasons but
00:53:36.200 everybody's got their little complaint uh i would argue that at this point the congress is doing nothing
00:53:44.200 but trying to avoid being targeted by trump so if you think that any of these votes on the big beautiful
00:53:52.280 bill are going to be based on the details of what's in the big beautiful bill it's not
00:54:00.920 we are in a world where that thing we call our uh democratic republic you know whatever our system of
00:54:08.760 government is it's entirely broken and right now the republicans in the house and the senate
00:54:17.080 are simply just trying to keep their jobs by not pissing off trump they are not voting on what would
00:54:25.160 be good for the people they're not it's not it's just not even a variable they are not involved in
00:54:32.920 what's good for the country they are only involved in trying to avoid trump's wrath because he says he's
00:54:40.840 going to go after him but interestingly um since musk has targeted the people who vote for it and trump
00:54:50.280 has targeted the people who are going to vote against it you have this weird situation where the
00:54:57.400 republicans have created a trap for themselves the trap for themselves is that if they vote for it
00:55:05.400 musk will try to take them out through funding a primary challenge if they vote against it trump
00:55:14.920 will try to take them out so they have two ways to lose and no way to win and who created that
00:55:23.640 situation it wasn't the democrats there was not one democrat involved in that but the republicans have
00:55:31.960 created created a trap that they can't get out of there's there's no way that this works out for the republicans
00:55:41.880 in congress they get they get to choose which way they destroy themselves voting for it or voting against it
00:55:49.800 so what happens well under those situations if i could predict i would predict it will get delayed
00:55:58.360 what would you do if you knew that no matter what you do it's going to be bad for you you would look to
00:56:07.480 delay it so uh i would not be surprised if instead of it getting you know approved although i think
00:56:16.280 there's a high chance it'll be improved approved on uh thursday there's a pretty high chance because going
00:56:23.240 going against trump is certain death politically going against musk is probably a real big problem
00:56:35.800 but they might judge that musk that musk is not as scary as trump or would not be as effective at
00:56:43.560 taking their jobs and they might be right about that so that thing called our democratic republic the
00:56:51.240 system that you think you're in where you vote for your representatives and then the representatives
00:56:57.800 take your interests and you know try to negotiate them with the other elected officials nothing like
00:57:05.080 that is happening instead we've created the system where they're just saying who is scarier musk or trump
00:57:13.960 what the fuck kind of a political system is that well no worse than what we had
00:57:26.440 um i guess one of the big changes in the big beautiful bill would be to instead of being a joe biden
00:57:35.080 and forgiving everybody's student debts um the reconciliation bill will make it
00:57:42.200 uh put more pressure on people to pay back their student debts basically but it will eliminate all
00:57:49.080 the all the ways they can do it and uh make that a little bit of a tighter process so that's a big deal
00:57:57.000 which will obviously cost them some votes with students who have loans um let's see what else happened
00:58:06.760 at the moment according to the hill it's reporting on a npr pbs news marist poll uh republicans are more
00:58:20.520 popular than they've been in a long time so the republicans in congress uh are up to a 36 percent of
00:58:29.880 registered voters approved for the job republicans are doing and in congress not just trump the highest
00:58:37.080 level recorded since they started asking the question in 2011. so even though the big beautiful bill is not
00:58:46.280 passed it would appear that republican voters are liking the effort now like i say it's a it's a totally
00:58:56.120 bastardized sick process you know where they're just trying to keep their jobs and deciding if musk or
00:59:04.440 trump is more dangerous to their their profession but apparently the public is happy that they're fighting
00:59:12.520 it out and that there's a lot of stuff in the bill that republicans like
00:59:16.840 but it's not like uh all politicians are getting more popular because the democrats are down 12 points
00:59:27.480 in popularity according to the same poll since february february of 2024. so now they're down to 27
00:59:38.120 i think they're doing a good job in congress the democrats all right um i saw that tesla stock was
00:59:46.280 up a little bit after it had been drifting down because of musk and trump uh fighting over the big
00:59:53.880 beautiful bill and uh today musk said on x quote so tempting to escalate this so so tempting but i will
01:00:04.040 refrain from now for now so um it could be that because elon looks like he's gonna moderate his reaction to
01:00:14.920 it that people are saying oh it's time to jump back in that tesla stock that might be what's happening
01:00:22.760 but there are a lot of variables there too meanwhile speaking of musk uh i saw the mario nawfall post
01:00:31.240 who by the way you should all be following if you're not following mario nawfall on x you're missing a lot of
01:00:39.480 good uh independent reporting about the news um he reports that uh i guess the source here was a breaking defense
01:00:52.680 that spacex uh has a contract with um with space force to or with our military
01:01:04.040 to build 480 plus military satellites for a new network that would be just for the military of just
01:01:12.360 satellites and it's a gigantic deal um the details are classified but doesn't it seem to you that
01:01:24.680 the government needs tesla or the government needs musk as much as musk needs the government it's hard
01:01:33.400 for me to see that uh all the rhetoric especially what trump is using about you know maybe they should
01:01:41.400 look at cutting his funding and maybe they should look at deporting him we assume that that's just talk
01:01:50.120 and that you know as people pointed out to me trump didn't start the fight at least not directly he's
01:01:59.080 just responding to musk's provocations so i'll accept that i'll accept that it does seem inappropriate
01:02:10.280 the things that trump is saying about musk i i don't like the fact that he even teased about deporting him
01:02:17.560 i don't think you should even tease about that but it is true that trump didn't start it and that
01:02:26.200 he hits back as hard as he gets hit and if you were to say that's no harder than musk was hitting him
01:02:33.480 first i could see that so i will i will grudgingly say that in this one situation going too far might be
01:02:44.520 pretty predictably just ordinary trump stuff it doesn't mean much
01:02:51.880 well in other news um the white house says it's close to well as a deal with israel for a 60-day
01:03:00.200 ceasefire with hamas but hamas has not approved it i don't know what the odds are that hamas would say yes
01:03:06.440 yes and um i don't think hamas wants a temporary ceasefire i think they only want to say yes to
01:03:15.240 something that would end the fighting entirely but it might be that the temporary ceasefire is how you
01:03:21.480 start i'm no expert but um the fact that israel has a ceasefire plan and the white house likes it
01:03:33.000 that's not nothing and it seems to me that trump would like to follow up on what looked like the
01:03:39.960 best month that any president ever had by adding a gaza ceasefire and maybe maybe eventually a peace deal
01:03:49.560 um to that part of the world because that would unlock the abraham accords it would allow other
01:03:56.280 countries to join and he could just be rolling up the victories like crazy so he's already in um
01:04:05.480 i would say uncontested best president ever territory now obviously democrats would disagree but in my
01:04:14.280 opinion he is now already trump is in best president of all time to me it looks that way i mean we haven't
01:04:24.840 seen anything like this in our lifetime and before that i wouldn't know but uh if he got gaza too
01:04:33.880 oh my goodness and it it kind of makes sense now that trump was supporting that yahoo about his his uh
01:04:45.400 court situation it it could be that this is just trump being trump where if he needs somebody to do
01:04:53.400 something that maybe is not comfortable such as a ceasefire with hamas that he might make sure that they
01:05:01.000 got a win for it and the win would be that he's backing netanyahu really hard and saying great things
01:05:08.360 about him so that might have been necessary to get israel to say yeah we could work on a ceasefire
01:05:17.000 even if it's not what they wanted to do but if trump gets that um i think that you know unless something
01:05:26.920 weird happened after that he would be just unambiguously history will record him as
01:05:34.760 our most effective most important president um probably he's already there but man just imagine
01:05:42.920 adding gaza to your win list and the timing is right i mean that they must have war exhaustion on both
01:05:51.480 sides at this point we'll see ontario the wait is over the gold standard of online casinos has arrived
01:06:01.000 golden nugget online casino is live bringing vegas style excitement and a world-class gaming experience
01:06:06.920 right to your fingertips whether you're a seasoned player or just starting signing up is fast and
01:06:12.600 simple and in just a few clicks you can have access to our exclusive library of the best slots and top
01:06:18.200 tiered table games make the most of your downtime with unbeatable promotions and jackpots that can
01:06:23.320 turn any mundane moment into a golden opportunity at golden nugget online casino take a spin on the
01:06:29.640 slots challenge yourself at the tables or join a live dealer game to feel the thrill of real-time action
01:06:35.400 all from the comfort of your own devices why settle for less when you can go for the gold at golden nugget
01:06:41.480 casino gambling problem call connects ontario 1-866-531-2600 19 and over physically present
01:06:49.640 in ontario eligibility restrictions apply see golden nugget casino.com for details please play responsibly
01:06:56.200 meanwhile iran's president said that they're going to suspend iran will suspend their cooperation with
01:07:02.600 the iaea which is the group that would inspect their domestic nuclear power programs to make sure it
01:07:09.960 wasn't being weaponized now here's my question if iran is going to suspend their cooperation with
01:07:18.120 the iaea are they not signaling that they plan to build a nuclear weapon because if they plan to just
01:07:29.880 have nuclear domestic power it seems like they would sign up for saying all right all right
01:07:36.760 we'll definitely have the iaea investigate because that's that would make everybody comfortable
01:07:43.720 so they're one of two possibilities when they say they're you know not going to cooperate with them
01:07:51.800 they either have a death wish because this would kill them all basically if they just started
01:07:57.720 rebuilding their nuclear program the weaponized part um or is it a negotiating chip
01:08:06.760 could it be that iran is cleverly sort of in a trump-like way creating an asset
01:08:14.520 that they will later trade away so for example the asset they've created is that they would not
01:08:21.800 cooperate with the iaea they just created that that asset just by saying they won't do it now they have
01:08:29.800 something to trade so they'll say all right all right if you drop the sanctions we might change our mind
01:08:37.720 about these inspectors so could be that they're just crazy you know crazy people who want to have a death
01:08:47.320 wish but it could be just a negotiating chip we'll see all right i have a suggestion about how to minimize
01:08:58.120 mom danny zoran mom danny as you know and i often talk about it uh the facts don't matter so much as the
01:09:07.000 persuasion when it comes to politics it's how you feel about something and when mom danny says stuff
01:09:15.880 like i'm going to work on your affordability the average voter might not look that deep into it
01:09:22.760 to find out that there's any downside to that and say affordability i like that yeah i wouldn't i
01:09:29.720 wouldn't mind a little affordability so if you're going to attack him it would be hard to attack him
01:09:36.120 on policy because voters are not really engaged at the policy level beyond affordability sure
01:09:43.400 so how could you attack somebody who's so good at what he does he's really good at social media he's
01:09:51.320 good at interviews etc well i have a suggestion he has a creepy smile one of the things that makes him
01:10:04.200 popular is he always seems smiling i believe that trump especially trump could reframe his smile
01:10:13.720 as a sign of being disingenuous as a sign of being disingenuous and a scam artist because the smile to me
01:10:21.400 sometimes looks natural but i can easily convince myself that it's creepy so imagine if you will
01:10:32.040 that trump started saying the communist with a creepy smile do you feel that
01:10:40.760 the communist with a creepy smile because if you're a democrat and somebody says some stuff that you
01:10:50.040 like to hear oh affordability i like that are you going to feel the same if he gets branded as having a
01:10:58.440 creepy smile that creepy smile that creepy smile thing you can feel it can't you yeah you tell yeah creepy
01:11:07.960 copy smile the communist part might not be enough to stop him from taking office there might be enough
01:11:15.880 voters who are like ah every republicans call everybody a communist so i'll just ignore that part
01:11:23.080 but creepy smile that's a death blow that's a kill shot
01:11:29.400 so if it were me and i would say don't fall for the communist with a creepy smile
01:11:38.680 he's he's up to no good he'd you know he's he's not your friend
01:11:45.240 because everybody would interpret creepy smile in their own way which is really good persuasion you don't
01:11:52.520 want you don't want to tell them what to think you just want to guide them into an area that they
01:11:58.120 weren't thinking about which is that his smile looks disingenuous and there's something off about him
01:12:08.120 now i'm just watching the comments to see if that's hitting doesn't that feel like they hit you right in the
01:12:14.520 the stomach as opposed to talking about policies you can feel that can't you the creepy smile you would
01:12:23.880 never get that out of your head creepy communist smile so that's my suggestion all right uh i would
01:12:33.080 also refer to him as the shirtless guy with the flag at the uh at the ice protests do you remember the
01:12:41.640 iconic uh guy who had a mask on so you couldn't see his face but he was shirtless and he was standing
01:12:48.760 on top of burning cars and he was waving the palestinian flag if i were running against him
01:12:58.200 i might sort of tongue-in-cheek suggest that that was him because the guy's wearing a mask and it looks
01:13:05.880 like a you know skinny young guy just like him anyway um so the white house is working on a way to
01:13:19.240 exclude undocumented illegal aliens from the u.s census steven miller is talking about that
01:13:27.080 now the reason to do that and the reason they would want to do an immediate new census
01:13:31.880 um would be that uh if you could exclude the non-citizens in california alone it would
01:13:43.080 it would remove four house seats because the number of representatives you get depends on the
01:13:49.160 population of your state so if they reduce the number of people who are counted in terms of your
01:13:56.680 population which is what a census would do if they didn't count the undocumented people then it would
01:14:04.600 force the system to reduce the number of representatives now if they could get away with that
01:14:12.520 that would be a super clever political move but i feel like that probably would not work
01:14:20.360 work the one time they tried it a federal judge blocked it but now that the supreme court has said that
01:14:30.200 federal judges can't block stuff um they might just do another executive order and see what happens
01:14:39.480 i guess it would probably be class action suits and stuff but uh maybe maybe that lane is open that they
01:14:48.200 they could get away with that i'm betting against it i don't think they'll get away with it
01:14:54.120 because it's a little too close to a constitutional question that might be black and white so i'm no
01:15:02.040 expert meanwhile the libs of tick tock is telling us that stanford medicine is going to end their
01:15:10.680 transgender surgery for minors because of pressure from the trump administration
01:15:15.640 um so we keep hearing more stories about that meanwhile um uh chairman jim jordan according to politico
01:15:30.040 is asking for documents uh from penn and from brown universities
01:15:37.240 um and they're they're probing into seeing if they did price fixing that the uh the ivy league schools
01:15:48.120 may be coordinating their tuition so that you can't you know easily go to the cheaper ivy league school
01:15:56.200 so if they find that that's true that's going to be a lot of pressure on the ivy league schools if
01:16:03.560 they were actually colluding to keep their prices high maybe i imagine that they wouldn't be asking
01:16:11.960 for documents about it unless they had some whistleblowers said that meanwhile the fbi according to the epoch
01:16:21.000 times um has charged four californians with the largest ever covid tax fraud scheme
01:16:29.960 they allegedly stole 93 million dollars in covet tax credits um so do you ever wonder where all the money went
01:16:43.320 just in general you know we have this rich country and then suddenly we've got 37 37 trillion dollars in debt
01:16:51.240 and you said to yourself what where did all that money go well my guess is something like a i don't know
01:17:03.080 half a trillion dollars a year just goes to fraud because we're bad at checking where our money goes
01:17:10.360 but maybe that'll turn around in other news this didn't happen right away but i just saw it today
01:17:17.960 did you know that trump had authorized the building of a new air force jet which will be the f47 which is
01:17:25.960 funny because he's the 47th president and boeing won that competition and in three years or so they might
01:17:34.440 have a new a new jet the f47 over in china china has uh put on a soccer competition with just robots
01:17:47.240 now uh those robots were not very good at playing soccer so it didn't look like it was the best
01:17:55.160 state-of-the-art robots but they played soccer um it was compared to a five or six year old child
01:18:04.280 playing soccer but they did run after the ball and kick it towards the goal and you know tried to block
01:18:11.320 it if it was coming the wrong way so there are now ai-controlled robots that play soccer poorly
01:18:19.640 but that'll be better by next year all right i'm going to give you a little micro lesson
01:18:27.320 that i know you you need because many of you were criticizing me online because you thought you
01:18:34.600 had better information than i did about putting batteries and solar in the network so
01:18:42.440 um i was criticizing doug bergam for saying that solar power doesn't work when it's when it's nighttime
01:18:51.640 and i said you know it just makes you feel it makes you look stupid if you don't acknowledge that
01:18:58.200 there's batteries in the network so the solar charges the batteries and then the batteries can run at night
01:19:05.080 now people said scott you idiot you fool how do you not know that it is uneconomical
01:19:17.560 to put batteries and solar power into the grid how do you not know that to which i say um
01:19:27.000 maybe you need a little update on your technology so that's what i'm going to give you
01:19:32.120 uh according to grok how many of these uh solar powered and then battery you know matched with
01:19:43.480 batteries how many of them are currently in the grid if it's uneconomical then nobody would do it right
01:19:53.320 right nobody would do it if it's uneconomical and so many people told me it's just never going
01:19:59.320 to be economical well why are there 1600 of them with 125 in construction around the world so you're
01:20:08.760 telling me that uh thousands thousands of different experts are unaware of what you know
01:20:18.520 that it would never make sense to build a solar solar energy and add batteries to it
01:20:24.520 it why are they doing it if it's uneconomical in every country it's like all over the place it's
01:20:32.520 not just one country or anything um and the us has 575 of them across seven major grids are you telling
01:20:43.640 me that all of those projects were uneconomical and the people who built them didn't know it is that what
01:20:51.080 you believe here's what you were trying to tell me you're trying to tell me but scott the batteries
01:20:59.400 will only last two to four hours and they're only good for handling peak loads right now you're getting
01:21:07.480 really mad at me already right because you're sure that i didn't know that no i do know that i do know
01:21:16.120 that the current technology is that it's only going to handle your peak periods so does that
01:21:24.040 mean you shouldn't build it no obviously it works out obviously the economics do work that's why there's
01:21:32.280 so many of them so given that we're uh approaching the ai era we're well we're in the ai era and knowing
01:21:43.960 that we need every bit of electricity we can do do you think it's a bad idea to have systems that can
01:21:52.520 only do two to four hours of peak load no that's not a bad idea the the thing with energy that you need
01:22:01.800 to know is that more is better and suppose it's the not the most economical way to do it still do it
01:22:10.680 still do it we're not in a we're not in a place in history where the only power that you add to the
01:22:18.520 network is the most economical power maybe there was a time when that made sense but now we're in a
01:22:26.760 place where if you can make any kind of electricity in any way or you can help help the existing power
01:22:36.680 plants get over a peak period hump if you can do anything with any technology that allows you to
01:22:45.960 have more electricity than you would have had otherwise it probably is economical because ai will
01:22:53.320 you know be such a big uh you know a big money maker that they're going to spend a lot of money
01:22:59.320 to make sure they have power now some of you said but scott you know what about the recycling of the
01:23:06.360 batteries well that's that's changing quickly the ability to recycle batteries the big batteries that
01:23:13.240 are in the network that's you know their companies are working on that now what about the necessity of
01:23:21.000 rare earth minerals to make batteries some people said scott you fool that would make us do all this
01:23:27.800 you know this this mining that's bad for the environment and we don't have enough of the rare earth to
01:23:35.480 which i say this is the reason that i read to you almost every day that there's a new laboratory
01:23:43.880 breakthrough in batteries and many of them are about not needing those critical minerals
01:23:50.920 or materials so there's a whole bunch of stuff that's happening in the development of batteries
01:23:57.240 that would make them easier to recycle last longer and be cheaper and remember if you're putting them
01:24:05.400 in the network they don't have to be lightweight so it doesn't have to be really light like it would
01:24:11.000 in a car they could be you know 10 times bigger than you think they ought to be because it's just going
01:24:17.800 to be sitting in the network somewhere so here's the next thing that my critics got wrong
01:24:24.600 if it's true that that the only thing that you'd be happy with is 16 hours of battery storage we will
01:24:34.040 have that probably in 10 years so that i i think elon musk was talking about that musk was talking about
01:24:42.200 building a gigafactory for solar in the united states and one of the commenters said wait what if you
01:24:51.560 combined an ai data center that needs all this power with a solar powered you know battery battery kind of
01:25:02.120 network and he winked which suggests that was on point and that he's looking to use gigantic solar
01:25:13.000 with batteries uh networks to partially power the data centers so he might be looking to build that gigafactory
01:25:22.120 right now so why would he do that if it's not economical according to my critics
01:25:28.680 do you do you think that elon musk is not aware of the economics of solar or batteries do you think
01:25:38.520 you know more about batteries and solar than elon musk does i'm pretty sure that he's going to be
01:25:46.280 leaping into that business and playing the long game so in in somewhere in the 2030s
01:25:54.600 it looks like batteries it looks like batteries probably will be good enough that they could last
01:25:59.720 for 16 hours and cheap enough so it makes sense to use them and easy enough to recycle and easy enough
01:26:08.040 to get the rare earth minerals because it wouldn't use many rare earth minerals so my critics also said
01:26:17.480 scott you fool um you know even if you think that this could work solar is um solar is not as good
01:26:27.000 an idea as nuclear that nuclear would have better economics and produce you know more consistent
01:26:34.120 base load doesn't have a nighttime problem so solar so nuclear is the way to go right
01:26:40.440 but do you see the inconsistency of comparing nuclear to solar let me tell you it's a timing thing
01:26:52.120 if i said to you start building your nuclear power plant today how long do you think it would take you to
01:26:58.440 get it done if you were to use existing technology to build a nuclear power plant would it take 20 years
01:27:09.560 and cost 30 billion dollars i don't know how long it would take do you know why nuclear is is so uh
01:27:18.520 has such a high potential it's not because of the things we already know how to do
01:27:24.360 it's because there's a lot of work happening in developing nuclear so that it's a whole different
01:27:30.520 engineering situation and you can make them you know you can make them easier cheaper and safer
01:27:37.800 so if you're going to allow that nuclear is the future but you couldn't do it today you you kind
01:27:45.480 of have to you know you're gonna have to test a number of uh startups basically startups who are
01:27:52.440 trying to build nuclear power plants in the best way and it's going to be 10 years
01:27:59.960 it's going to be 10 years before you see a bunch of nuclear power coming online it's just going to take
01:28:06.440 that long so if you're going to say that nuclear is the future but not what we have now but rather
01:28:14.520 what we can develop fairly quickly next few years then you should use the same analysis for batteries
01:28:22.360 what we could do right now with batteries not ideal you know you get two to four hours of peak
01:28:28.760 coverage in your network not too impressive but if we keep hammering at it and keep developing it and
01:28:37.000 make sure that the market exists what do you think batteries are going to look like in 10 years so
01:28:45.000 that's my micro lesson on batteries um i hope that helped all right
01:28:51.560 and uh russia took full control of the luhansk region in ukraine newsmax world is reporting which uh
01:29:04.840 tells you why putin is willing to keep fighting because he's nibbling more and more of ukraine
01:29:11.400 so why would putin want to want peace when he's still gaining territory so that one's going to be a
01:29:20.440 tough one uh blaze media says uh that uh cash patel is uh his fbi is resting a bunch of chinese spies
01:29:33.080 that have been targeting u.s uh military people trying to convert them to spies how many spies do we have
01:29:39.800 in this country i don't know and then a new study says that senior citizens are going to marijuana and
01:29:49.560 in record numbers uh the use of cannabis by older adults is quadrupled and then there's a new study
01:29:57.880 that says if you use a lot of cannabis um it will be bad for your memory but if you use a low dose it
01:30:06.840 might even improve your memory if you're a middle-aged human do i believe that no not really but sounds good
01:30:16.600 all right that's all i got for today sorry i ran long um i will talk to you all tomorrow same time
01:30:25.080 same place if you're a locals beloved subscriber stay around because i'm going to go private with
01:30:32.360 locals right now for a very short moment the rest of you thanks for joining see you tomorrow
01:30:46.600 uh
01:30:49.560 you
01:31:16.600 Thank you.
01:31:46.600 Thank you.
01:32:16.600 Thank you.
01:32:46.600 Thank you.