Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2946 CWSA 09⧸02⧸25

00:00:00.000 Good morning. There you are. Come on in. That's right. It's time. It's time for your favorite

00:00:08.540 thing. Mine too. It's actually my favorite part of the day usually. Well, let's check

00:00:15.820 your stocks. All right, let's not. We won't check your stocks. Nope. I didn't even bring

00:00:23.180 it up. I don't even know what you're talking about. Forget your stocks. Because we're about

00:00:32.100 to have a good time.

00:00:46.620 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight

00:00:52.980 of human civilization. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams. You've never had a better

00:00:57.540 time. But if you'd like to take a chance on elevating your experience to levels nobody

00:01:04.620 can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains, all you need for that is a

00:01:11.980 cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any

00:01:16.340 kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the

00:01:22.760 unparalleled pleasure. The dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything

00:01:26.360 better. It's called, that's right, the simultaneous sip. Go.

00:01:37.520 Well, I had a little scare today. I'm preparing for the show and I'm looking at all these little

00:01:43.960 suggestions that war is coming. You know, all these small ways like, oh, we got the Navy

00:01:51.040 surrounding Venezuela. And probably there were three different news items that seemed like

00:01:59.020 an invitation to war. And all of a sudden, outside my window, which was, you know, pitch

00:02:05.940 black because it was before sunup, I see a flash. Sort of almost like lightning happened.

00:02:12.680 And then I hear boom, boom, boom. I'm like, oh, shoot. Are we being bombed? And I'm thinking,

00:02:24.280 are the bombs so big that it's really happening in San Francisco, you know, which is an hour

00:02:29.940 away? But maybe I can see it. Because I'll tell you one thing, it couldn't be thunder and

00:02:36.600 lightning because this is California and it's September 2nd. And it would be a little bit

00:02:41.980 unusual that there'd be any rain. And sure enough, there was a 17 minute rainstorm, which

00:02:50.780 is the only one I remember all summer. I don't remember it raining all summer, which is not

00:02:55.820 unusual for where I live. And it was actually kind of frightening when you put it in context

00:03:03.220 of, you know, I'm a little bit worried that somebody might attack the homeland. Anyway,

00:03:09.280 the good news is, finally, you can buy a $100,000 coffee robot. It's a robot that makes your coffee.

00:03:21.580 And that's all it does. That's all it does. And they say the payback would be two to three years.

00:03:28.700 It's yet again, another single mission robot. I don't know if I told you my coffee robot

00:03:36.260 experience from my local mall. They had a coffee robot kiosk set up so you could actually buy coffee

00:03:44.160 from a robot. And the first several times I saw it, there was a human attendant in case

00:03:50.660 anything went wrong. But by the time I decided to give it a try one day, there was no human

00:03:56.800 attendant. And, you know, I didn't want to try it when the human was there, because what's the point?

00:04:02.300 You know, you want to test the robot, you know, without a human. So I put in my order. And then

00:04:10.120 the robot very slowly goes through the steps of making what I want. But as soon as I pushed what

00:04:17.780 I wanted, I realized it wasn't really what I wanted. And indeed, it was so not what I wanted that I

00:04:24.300 wouldn't have anything to do with it. And I'd spend some ungodly amount for a cup of coffee

00:04:31.560 and had to stand there just so I could take it and pour it out. And that was my experience with

00:04:37.620 a coffee robot. So you see, if I'd been talking to a human barista, I would have said, even if they'd

00:04:45.140 already started, I would have said, oh, darn, it's my fault. I ordered the wrong thing. Can I adjust? 0.95

00:04:51.880 And the human would have said to me, no problem, because they would rather have me as a repeat

00:04:58.000 customer. And they would throw away what they started and start doing it the real way. And I'm

00:05:02.680 thinking, you know, there might be like a hundred different reasons that you just won't put up with

00:05:09.100 a robot. Like that's one that I wouldn't have imagined, that the length of time you had to wait

00:05:15.940 for the cup of coffee that you didn't want is so long when you're watching a robot make it.

00:05:23.200 So anyway, beware of coffee robots taking over. Well, this might be the funniest story of the day.

00:05:34.500 And it's a day of funny stories. As you know, a climate activist, Greta Thunberg, is trying to do her

00:05:42.580 second flotilla to Gaza to protest Israel's actions there. And according to Breitbart News, she had to

00:05:53.780 turn back because the winds were too high. So let me pull this all together for you if you're not already

00:06:03.500 laughing. When the weather bothers somebody else, it's climate change. When the weather cancels her

00:06:17.440 plans, it's weather. Didn't she predict that there would be more severe storms? I think she did. She

00:06:31.940 wasn't right about that. There were not more severe storms. But the fact that, you know, she tries to

00:06:37.880 change causes from climate change, which is obviously not working out. I'll tell you more

00:06:44.520 about that. And trying to become the, you know, the Gaza champion. And she gets stopped by the weather.

00:06:52.780 So she'll probably take another run at it when the weather gets better. Well, speaking of climate

00:07:01.060 change, you know that the experts were also saying that there's going to be more forest fires. And

00:07:09.400 because of the warming, everything would be dried out. And next thing you know, one match would burn up

00:07:14.700 half the world because it's all dried out. But the opposite is happening. Bjorn Lomborg is

00:07:21.360 reminding us. I believe this has been a long-term trend that there are fewer fires and fire damages

00:07:32.180 every year because we're getting better at managing that basically. So apparently some new data came out

00:07:38.800 that 2025 could become the lowest burn year in the 21st century. So big news on Lisa Cook just

00:07:51.780 received. Bill Pulte is saying. Interesting. So we'll talk about that. So here are the things that

00:08:04.460 climate change confidently told us was going to happen, which would have been verification that

00:08:10.760 they were onto something and that their understanding of the world was the right one. And if you didn't

00:08:17.800 believe that climate change was a problem, they were going to prove it to you in 12 years when

00:08:22.100 everything went to hell. So they told us the coral reefs were in trouble, but indeed they seem to have

00:08:30.020 recovered and it seems to be just normal cyclical behavior. They told us the oceans would rise.

00:08:36.920 I haven't seen any reports of any populated place that's having a problem with rising sea level.

00:08:45.120 Have you? Is it maybe I just don't see it because the algorithm isn't feeding it to me?

00:08:50.820 But I don't think there is. What about the melting Arctic ice? Didn't we learn that

00:08:58.300 that wasn't going the direction it looked like it should? And what about the temperatures in the

00:09:04.440 recent years? Aren't they sort of out of model? Now they would say, well, you know, you could have

00:09:11.260 periods where it's not warming up that much. Then there'd be other periods where it is. But I feel

00:09:17.680 like coral reef, hurricanes, storms, fires, rising oceans, melting Arctic ice, and even the temperature

00:09:27.800 has sort of paused. Now what's left? Isn't that basically every variable that they told us was

00:09:38.160 going to move in one direction did not? Every one of them? Is there anything left of the climate change

00:09:46.280 predictions? There might be. I mean, you would think that they couldn't all move in the wrong

00:09:53.080 direction. There would be at least one variable, wouldn't you think? There'd be at least one

00:09:58.380 variable that would make it look like the climate change people got it right. But I'm not sure there

00:10:04.620 is. There might be no variables that match any of their predictions of doom. Am I right about that?

00:10:13.040 I'll put that as a, I'm not 100% sure, but I think every single variable went the wrong way

00:10:18.920 in recent years. So we'll see. And you know what I always say? What do I always say at the end of a

00:10:28.340 climate change story? Wait till you find out about the climate models. There's a 100% chance

00:10:37.380 that in the future there will be exposés of how the climate models were fraudulent and that they knew

00:10:43.500 they were. You want to, anybody want to make a bet? I say a hundred percent that someday, the trouble

00:10:50.680 is I can't put a deadline on it. It might be 10 years from now, 20 years from now, but I guarantee

00:10:56.200 there's going to be, you know, an investigative journalism situation where they go, well, we got

00:11:02.720 a whistleblower and guess what? They always knew that the models did not predict. That's what I predict.

00:11:10.360 Well, according to Newsweek, Secretary of Commerce Howard Ludnick's talking about how the US government

00:11:18.920 under Trump administration wants to own some of the patents for inventions that the universities

00:11:27.140 come up with if those universities were taking government money as grants to do the science that

00:11:34.580 created the patents. To which I say, it's another sign of fascism. No, it's not. It would be fascism if

00:11:45.500 perhaps you believed that Trump was going to keep the money for himself. It's not fascism if he's

00:11:52.620 making you money. Literally, this would be the taxpayer's money. So if he could get some value out of the

00:12:02.820 patents, and there probably would be over time, that wouldn't go to Trump, he would be long retired.

00:12:09.660 It goes to us. So no, don't worry about it being fascism. They're literally just trying to give you

00:12:15.920 a bonus. That's it. And I'm in favor of it. It does make sense that if we taxpayers are funding the

00:12:26.060 patents, does it make sense that if Harvard gets one, that Harvard gets to keep it? It was our money.

00:12:32.480 Why wouldn't we ask for a piece of the action? Totally makes sense to me.

00:12:39.040 Well, you will be very sad to learn that Representative Jerry Nadler is retiring.

00:12:43.940 He says he wants to make room for the younger generation.

00:12:48.000 So here's what I think. You all know that the Democrat Party has collapsed, and it's not very

00:12:57.580 popular at the moment. And one of the things that we don't talk about enough, we talk about it in its

00:13:02.980 pieces, but we don't put it all together. So I'm going to put it all together. Here are the pieces.

00:13:09.740 Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Swalwell, Jamie Raskin. Now, I could add a few people to that

00:13:17.900 list, but what do they all have in common? Besides being noxious Democrats, what do they have in

00:13:24.220 common? Well, let me tell you. They all have a super unpleasant personas. Now, I'm curious if I'm

00:13:38.180 operating entirely unbiased when I say that. Am I? Because I know that there are Republicans who

00:13:44.660 cause a turnoff ick factor. So maybe it just works both ways, and the only one I can see is

00:13:54.640 the direction that my bias is already tuned to. If you were to turn on CNN or MSNBC, and they add on

00:14:07.740 a prominent Democrat leader, what are the odds that that prominent Democrat leader would be

00:14:14.320 really hard to look at on video? Let's say Schumer, Chuck Schumer. When Chuck Schumer is on the screen,

00:14:26.420 I want to turn off the picture and go to audio, and even then, I'm a penguin. Even then, I don't want

00:14:34.580 to watch him. He just doesn't have any charisma. Now, I don't say that about, let's say, AOC. I don't

00:14:42.180 say that about Omar, just to pick two people. They have actual charisma. Would you agree? You might not

00:14:53.040 like it. I'm not saying I'm in favor of their policies. Don't get me wrong. I'm just saying that

00:14:58.420 they legitimately have really, you know, first-rate charisma. You had Jasmine Crockett, more to my

00:15:06.360 point. It seems to me that the Democrats, for reasons that I cannot understand, have promoted

00:15:13.180 the opposite kind of people that Trump does. You know, people make fun of Trump for saying,

00:15:19.280 oh, that's a good political appointment because this person looks like a movie star.

00:15:24.240 And we all laugh. It's like, oh, he's so shallow. No, he's not. It's called being right.

00:15:32.540 That's not shallow. It's not shallow to understand that people are totally persuaded,

00:15:39.020 very persuaded, by things like personality and looks. So Trump, you know, I don't even have to

00:15:47.700 name names. You know, you can start with the Secretary of Defense, and you could go down right down the

00:15:53.380 line. Trump has some good-looking people in office. Am I right? Male and female. So he doesn't

00:16:01.120 discriminate by looks, by gender, which is interesting. He likes handsome guys and attractive

00:16:08.200 women. And now compare that to Jerry Nadler, Schiff, Swalwell, Raskin, Schumer. I'm not wrong,

00:16:19.100 right? The Democrats have picked the most unpleasant video personas. You know, the people just don't come

00:16:27.200 across on video at all. And Trump went the other way. He personally is the most video-friendly

00:16:34.220 personality of all time. You know, certainly for his side. And they were the opposite way.

00:16:42.800 So getting rid of Nadler, I wonder if they'll wise up and try to get more pleasant-looking 1.00

00:16:51.200 people to lead them. Well, here's something I haven't developed a full opinion on. It's the

00:16:59.460 fact that, remember, the Maha Commission was going to deliver a report in 100 days, and they

00:17:07.560 came in at 98 days. They delivered the report on the root causes, which wouldn't be confirmed,

00:17:15.600 but rather, you know, their best take at what the root causes for autism would be. And so now

00:17:21.560 they've reported it. And there are four bullet points of the things that they've identified,

00:17:28.660 the Maha Commission, as causes of autism. Are you ready? Do you have your own guesses as to the

00:17:37.340 causes of autism, now that the experts have weighed in? They are, and the four of them

00:17:43.360 are, number one, ultra-processed foods. Number two, environmental toxins. Number three, chronic

00:17:55.700 stress and inactivity. And number four, over-medicalization of children. Now, are you

00:18:06.940 you, like I am, completely underwhelmed by that conclusion? Here's my problem. So I have questions

00:18:15.760 which you should not confuse. This is a good time to make sure that people understand the

00:18:22.900 right frame for this. When I do this podcast, I never try to talk as an expert unless it's

00:18:30.660 maybe something about persuasion, you know, something that's in my line of expertise, which

00:18:36.200 is narrow. I try to present myself as you, which is I read the news and I go, ah, there's

00:18:45.220 something missing here. Wait, what? So I'm basically confirming your suspicions that something's

00:18:52.900 missing. And then I take my own guesses and speculations and predictions, but I'm doing

00:18:59.280 it from a consumer of news perspective. If it looks like or it feels like I'm coming from

00:19:06.460 some kind of expert perspective about things like science or health or something, I'm not.

00:19:12.600 I'm coming at it from the consumer of you, trying to match you, not the experts. And when I look

00:19:19.040 at these four things, ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins, chronic stress and

00:19:23.600 inactivity, and over-medicalization of children, I say to myself, ah, those are a little too general.

00:19:33.200 And I also say to myself, at what age is autism normally detected? Do you know? So I think the

00:19:42.780 answer is, ah, uh, under two years old. You can, you can get it from, you know, age two to four

00:19:50.880 or something. Do you believe that the children who are two years old, ah, have been unusually,

00:20:00.380 let's say, unusually exposed to ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins, chronic stress and

00:20:07.520 inactivity and over-medicalization? I could, I could imagine that over-medicalization would

00:20:16.700 apply to somebody under two years old. Now, you could be, you could be diagnosed up into adulthood,

00:20:22.960 right? So that, but the earliest would be like two. Um, so my question is, why would some people

00:20:34.660 be, uh, be, uh, so exposed to ultra-processed foods that they would get autism and other people

00:20:42.420 would not? Uh, is there something like 10% of people have some sensitivity that others don't

00:20:49.320 have? So there's something about the timing of this, because it feels like if these were the

00:20:55.220 triggers and you could get it, if you were born without any propensity for autism, it feels

00:21:03.840 like there would be a lot more adults getting it, right? Or, or, or there would be like obvious

00:21:12.400 examples where maybe the, um, I don't know, the Amish don't get it or something. I just feel

00:21:19.340 like maybe what happened here was, uh, they wanted to make sure they came in under a hundred

00:21:24.740 days and all they did is put their suspicions into bullet points. I don't feel like, I don't

00:21:34.300 feel like we learned anything. Do you? But they said nothing about, um, genetics and certainly

00:21:42.940 there's some people who think genetics is, um, behind it. I don't know exactly how, you know,

00:21:50.080 why would it be suddenly spiking? That doesn't make sense. Anyway. And then I saw a video. I

00:21:58.840 don't know what, I don't know if it's really recent, but probably not too long ago that RFK

00:22:04.380 Jr. was talking to, uh, uh, uh, Bill Maher and, uh, RFK Jr. said, um, if you look at the studies,

00:22:15.300 he's talking about the COVID vaccinations. He said, if you look at the studies that were done

00:22:20.440 with the Pfizer vaccine, the people who got the vaccine had a 23% higher death rate from all causes.

00:22:26.780 Um, and Bill said, uh, but could that be the disease itself? Uh, and then RFK Jr. said, well,

00:22:37.120 the vaccine doesn't work, does it? Meaning that, you know, people were getting the disease,

00:22:42.540 even if they had the vaccination. So there's 23% higher death rate from all causes. And, uh,

00:22:50.160 do you think that there's a counter argument to that? If the only thing you knew was only

00:22:58.000 what RFK Jr. said in that interview, would you feel that you were confident that you knew what

00:23:04.820 was going on? Is that enough, enough variables for you? That, uh, the people who got the vaccine

00:23:12.600 had a 23% higher death rate from all causes. Now you want to hear the counter argument to that?

00:23:20.160 Here's a counter argument. There's no fucking study like that. That doesn't exist. It just doesn't 0.99

00:23:27.940 exist. Uh, so Mary from a neuro rad oncology on X, uh, did a long, uh, explanation about the actual

00:23:37.560 study he was referring to. And apparently there's no, there was no statistical difference. So the,

00:23:44.200 the answer is not, Ooh, how do we explain the 23% and all that? The answer is that didn't happen.

00:23:50.160 It's not in the study. Now is Mary right? I don't know. Mary seems very smart. So is RFK Jr.

00:24:01.040 right? Did he leave out some variables? How would I know? I mean, I can't really check the work of

00:24:06.960 either Mary or RFK Jr. But let me give you another reframe that will just break your brain. You ready?

00:24:15.840 You've heard me say this before, but now I'm going to apply it to this situation. And now it's going

00:24:21.900 to click for you. Get ready for this. This one's a mind blower. Okay. Now I've told you a million times

00:24:29.460 that there's a problem with reproducibility of studies, meaning that over half of them,

00:24:36.340 if you count the, the intentionally fraudulent ones and intentionally fraudulent publications and all

00:24:41.620 that probably over half turn out not to be true or not to be reproducible. All right. Now take that fact

00:24:50.980 that usually, you know, by a slight amount, usually any report about science is going to turn out to be

00:25:00.340 wrong. So then you hear a fact like this from RFK Jr. but that there's a study, turns out, you know,

00:25:08.900 maybe that doesn't exist or the study doesn't actually say that, but there's a factoid he gives

00:25:13.440 you. What should be your default, if you haven't done any research, you've done no research, what

00:25:21.200 should be your default opinion about that data? Here would be the wrong way to look at it. Well,

00:25:27.900 that agrees with my preconceived notion. That looks pretty good to me. I think we've got a winner.

00:25:35.740 Oh, yeah. Nope. That's just what I thought would happen. That, I mean, I told you I was smart. I had

00:25:42.200 that prediction and yeah, here it is. So that would be the wrong way to do it. I hear it would be the

00:25:49.820 right way to do it. It's probably not true. And it wouldn't matter who said it if they're quoting.

00:25:58.320 So, so you've got two problems here. One is, is, was this study even valid? And the answer is

00:26:04.040 probably not. And that's only based on probability of all studies. They're usually not true.

00:26:11.260 Yeah. A little over 50%. But on top of that, Mary explains that he interpreted the study wrong.

00:26:20.720 So you've got the risk that somebody interpreted wrong or the risk that they left out a key part

00:26:27.520 or a risk that you misunderstood what they said. On top of that is a risk that the science was

00:26:34.880 bullshit to begin with. So that's the world we live in. Your, your default assumption should be, 0.99

00:26:44.160 I have learned nothing. There's no information here. I would like to know. And maybe if there

00:26:50.140 were lots of studies and time went by and you know, the consensus moved in one direction or not,

00:26:55.220 you might feel more confident. But no, if somebody just throws out some shocking number like that,

00:27:00.300 that doesn't agree with other experts, probably not true. Could be. Can't rule it out. But probably

00:27:07.980 not. Probably not. All right. So thank you, Mary, for that very useful analysis. But if you want to

00:27:16.140 see her full analysis, look in my feed on X.

00:27:25.020 President Trump has announced that Rudy Giuliani is going to get the Medal of Freedom. Now, I don't know

00:27:32.140 if that was triggered by the fact that Rudy had that serious accident, vehicle accident that he's

00:27:37.900 recovering from. Or it was going to happen anyway. And, you know, just, they're going to do it now to

00:27:45.440 cheer him up. I don't know how that worked. But he's recovering. And so he was in New Hampshire and

00:27:52.100 pulled over because some woman who had been the victim of domestic abuse flagged him down.

00:27:58.480 And he must have parked. This is me speculating based on what little we know of the situation.

00:28:06.480 I think he pulled over to help. And then he was going to stay there with her until the police got

00:28:11.920 there because he helped her contact the police. So the police showed up and then he pulled into

00:28:17.820 traffic and just got rammed from behind by a 19 year old woman. And they didn't say that she was on her 0.78

00:28:26.360 phone. But when I hear a 19 year old woman, you know, hits some other car so hard that it just

00:28:35.140 obliterates it and puts somebody in the hospital, I kind of automatically think might have been on the

00:28:42.320 phone. I mean, I don't want to start any rumors or anything, but it's the first thing I think,

00:28:47.560 right? Isn't that the first thing you think? Because it's sort of hard, you know, even if you came

00:28:53.800 around a blind turn, it's sort of hard to hit somebody that hard if you're even watching the

00:29:00.100 road. So anyway, I don't know if alcohol was involved or anything else. We don't know. So we

00:29:06.940 won't assume, but I will assume that probably the place that he pulled over to help was not the safest

00:29:14.320 place to pull over. Meaning that when he pulled back into traffic, there probably was some lack of

00:29:20.840 visibility from the oncoming traffic. That's probably what happened. Probably just a lack of

00:29:27.000 visibility. A place you would never have pulled over, like unless you were helping some woman who

00:29:33.660 was a victim or something. So he did the right thing and took, probably took a little extra physical

00:29:41.260 risk to get it done. Well, no, definitely. Because he got in between an abuser and the abuse.

00:29:47.060 So that's pretty baller actually. You know, he's a hundred years old and he still decided he was

00:29:54.080 going to get involved in that. And then he was going to wait with her, which means that there was a

00:30:00.820 risk that the abuser was going to show up any minute. So that's pretty brave. And he took some risks to

00:30:08.440 help a person. And sadly, it didn't work out. So Medal of Freedom time.

00:30:16.860 Well, according to the Daily Mail, the Trump administration is thinking of a visa integrity

00:30:23.400 fee. So the people who travel to the U.S. and are required to have a visa would have to pay an

00:30:30.280 extra $250 above what they already pay. So it'd be $442 just to be allowed to come in the United States

00:30:37.360 to visit. To which I say, yeah, it's about time we had a cover fee. And I also would recommend a

00:30:45.460 two-drink minimum. If you're coming in from a visa country, I want $442 of your dollars and you've got 1.00

00:30:53.800 to commit to a two-drink minimum. That's how you become the hottest country. You know, a year ago,

00:31:01.720 the U.S. was dead. It was a dead country. Dead, I say. But now it's the hottest country.

00:31:10.200 Oh, it's so hot. Yeah, we can charge the cover fee. That's how hot we are. You just listen to

00:31:16.960 Mr. Trump. He'll tell you that. Well, Tom Fenton of Judicial Watch has a success, another success.

00:31:26.320 I guess he sued Oregon to force them to clean up their voter rolls. And Oregon had the worst

00:31:33.460 voter rolls, meaning they had the most people eligible to vote according to the voter rolls

00:31:39.900 who were not really eligible to vote. They were dead or they moved away or some other thing.

00:31:45.380 And he won in court. So now Oregon is going to have to fix their voter rolls. He's also sued

00:31:51.700 California and Illinois. Same thing. Now, do you think that'll make a difference? Do you buy into

00:31:58.580 the fact that maybe the worse the voter rolls are, the worse it is for Republican candidates?

00:32:06.900 Because it's the Democrats who are abusing that system? I don't know. I would say that

00:32:12.700 it's the sort of thing where there's a 100% chance that it's abused a little. What I don't know is,

00:32:23.580 is it abused a lot, you know, enough to change an election? That I don't know. But we'll find out.

00:32:30.780 So maybe, you know, maybe it's a movement in the right direction. But we'll find out.

00:32:36.900 And then there was CNN had a interview with Brad Todd, who's a political commentator. And he said

00:32:49.700 that we know the 2020 census, the errors were almost always to the detriment of red states.

00:32:56.260 Did you know that? Did you know that the 2020 census was considered, you know, flawed in some ways,

00:33:03.140 but that the flaws were overwhelmingly in one direction? Now, there were both flaws on blue and

00:33:11.700 red states, but the red states had the majority of the flaws. And CNN host said, do we know that?

00:33:18.500 And Todd said, we do know that the Census Bureau's own audit of its work has proven that. Okay,

00:33:25.340 if it's their own audit, I do believe that one. So if they redo the census, which Trump is asking,

00:33:33.140 for, and especially now these, you know, deported a number of non-citizens, this should be another 1.00

00:33:40.180 electoral advantage for Trump, right? So how many advantages are the Republicans stacking up at this

00:33:50.340 point? Let's see. They have completely destroyed the entire architecture of the fake news traditional

00:33:58.340 media. How big a deal is that for their election chances? Really big. And they've dominated the

00:34:07.140 podcasting, you know, space so far. Really good. That's really good. And then Tom Fenton and maybe

00:34:16.580 some others doing some things to clean up the voter rolls. How much difference will that make?

00:34:21.060 Might make a lot. We don't know. Might make a little. Might make none. Don't know yet. But it's

00:34:27.540 all, everything that might be making a difference is all leaning in one direction at this point.

00:34:34.580 What about Trump wanting to get rid of being able to vote without voter ID? Well, if he gets away with

00:34:42.260 that and also bans voting by mail, unless, except for the special cases, then those will be two things

00:34:51.140 that at least Republicans believe would take away some Democrat advantage. Then I saw the comments,

00:34:59.300 thank you, that the cuts in USAID and the other dismantling of the NGO dark money networks,

00:35:08.740 the pressure that's being put on Act Blue, which is a big funder of Democrat stuff, but they're being

00:35:16.340 accused of having some foreign influence and trying to repackage big money into little money, which would

00:35:22.100 be illegal. So their funding sources are gone. Their fake news protection racket still exists,

00:35:30.580 but is basically only looked at by people over 70. I think the median age is 70 for traditional news.

00:35:41.940 And the median age for podcasting is something in the low 30s, I think. So correct me if I'm wrong,

00:35:50.660 but isn't 100% of everything that's big enough to be in the news all heading in the same direction?

00:35:59.220 Oh, and then I forgot to even mention the redistricting. So they've got redistricting,

00:36:04.420 cleaning up voter rolls. Maybe they'll have movement on the mail-in ballots and the ID.

00:36:11.460 They've got the, maybe the census will be redone. That's a lot, isn't it? And you know,

00:36:21.060 you could argue that the reason Trump won, and I don't have any evidence of this, but it's just

00:36:27.380 one of those things that you can imagine might be true. There was a really big movement to have

00:36:34.020 observers, especially lawyers, at the election for 2024. I think Laura Trump and company were behind

00:36:42.100 that. I wonder if that change made anybody back off from any shenanigans. Now, again, I don't know

00:36:51.860 that they planned any. I don't know that there ever have been any shenanigans. It just looks like it.

00:36:58.500 And then we see that Trump has got the military surrounding Venezuela.

00:37:05.060 Now, I do not believe that I have any confident data that says Venezuela was involved in any kind of,

00:37:13.060 you know, rigging our election. But that's an accusation you hear. I just don't think that that's a,

00:37:19.540 has evidence. What would happen if the pressure that Trump is putting on militarily on Venezuela

00:37:29.140 produced, maybe not a war, because I don't want that, but maybe a negotiation. And maybe Trump would

00:37:37.460 say, I'll make you a deal. I'll go a little bit easy on you if you reveal everything you know about

00:37:43.940 what may or may not have, you know, been interference in our elections. We might find out,

00:37:51.780 because of the military pressure, we might find out if Venezuela had anything to do with any of our past

00:37:58.340 elections. Again, I don't want to be sued. So I want to say clearly, I'm not aware of any evidence of that.

00:38:04.260 I just know that that's a speculation that's floating around.

00:38:11.940 Well, I guess tomorrow, Thomas Massey has organized an event, do you call it an event in Congress,

00:38:23.220 press conference with 10 victims of Epstein's sex trafficking. So that's tomorrow at 1030,

00:38:30.900 I assume Eastern Time. Now, what would you expect from 10 victims of Epstein's sex trafficking

00:38:40.740 taking questions? How many of you believe that they're going to name names you have never heard

00:38:47.060 before? I don't expect that. It would be an amazing thing, good or bad. It'd be amazing if it happened.

00:38:59.940 Here's what I suspect. So, you know, dampening your enthusiasm for this. What I would expect is that

00:39:07.140 they'll all say that Epstein victimized them. They might throw in, you know, Prince Andrew,

00:39:14.500 because it feels like he's already sullied, like it wouldn't be adding anything. It's just,

00:39:19.140 oh yeah, and we'll throw in the name that you've heard before.

00:39:21.940 So I've got a feeling it's not going to make as much news as you thought. And one of the reasons

00:39:30.500 might be that there were, there was a god awful amount of money set aside for settlements.

00:39:36.500 And if you were one of the victims and you could prove it, and it seems like it'd be easy enough to

00:39:41.380 prove, or at least easy enough to prove that you might be able to prove it if you went to court,

00:39:46.980 there are probably a whole bunch of victims who've got big paychecks to shut up. So they might end up

00:39:55.540 saying, you know, I can't talk about that because I've got some kind of agreement, you know, to settle.

00:40:01.460 And I wouldn't blame them for that, by the way. I don't think that each of them individually

00:40:06.660 has some larger responsibility to the public. I don't think so. He's dead. You know, Epstein's

00:40:15.300 out of the picture. I think they should take the money. And if part of that was they had to agree to

00:40:20.180 shut up about it, it's not a perfect solution. But I wouldn't fault them for taking the deal. I'm

00:40:27.940 pretty sure I would have. So we'll watch that. Gavin Newsom lost in court. Again, Joel Pollack of

00:40:37.540 Breitbart tells us. I'm always bad on the lawyer and court stories. So let's see if I can get close

00:40:45.780 to this. The question was two bills, and one of them required the large online platforms to block

00:40:54.500 the posting of material deceptive content. So another stuff, basically anything that would matter

00:41:02.500 that was deceptive related to elections. And that did not, that was not affirmed by the court.

00:41:13.380 It also borrows material deceptive content. So that would be deep fakes, I think.

00:41:17.860 And well, no, not necessarily deep fakes, but anything that's materially deceptive. And Joel

00:41:26.100 points out that that would have included something like Kamala Harris claiming that Trump once said 0.98

00:41:31.620 that Nazis were very fine people. So there's no way you could use that as standard because you'd be 0.86

00:41:39.380 jailing everybody who opened their mouth in politics. Because all the politicians are saying

00:41:45.460 things that are not true. And they probably know they're not true on both sides. So you couldn't

00:41:51.460 really, in a practical way, have a law that said you're going to jail if you say something that's not

00:41:57.940 true. At least in this country. I mean, maybe other countries.

00:42:01.860 And then there was one of the, what are they? One of the proposed laws would require the online

00:42:12.740 platforms to regulate deep fakes, but that was rejected as well. So basically, Newsom wanted

00:42:22.660 California to have some control over the content online. And the court said, get out of here. You're

00:42:28.980 not going to have any more control than you already have, at least in regard to these specific things.

00:42:36.180 I think the judge said something about it would also kill the joke.

00:42:41.780 So that would be an awesome response if you're a judge. Yeah, that wouldn't be funny if you had

00:42:47.060 to admit it's a deep fake before somebody watched the video. So I think the judge says something along

00:42:54.580 those lines, which is awesome. All right. So satire and parody are now still protected.

00:43:02.980 This is one of those times when I'm happy to be an American, because free speech is a mighty,

00:43:10.820 mighty powerful thing in this country. We will fight for it. But in Britain, according to GB News,

00:43:18.980 one of their comedians got arrested at gunpoint when he came into Heathrow, Graham Lineham.

00:43:26.180 So I guess he created something called Father Ted, which they would know in England, but we wouldn't

00:43:30.980 know here. And he did some posts in the past. I don't know how long ago, but this is what they

00:43:37.700 arrested him for. And he called trans women violent. And he mocked a protest photo with trans people in

00:43:47.140 and he said, I hate them. And that was enough for him to be arrested at gunpoint entering the country. 0.95

00:43:58.820 Now, compare California and the United States where the judge said, get out of here. You'd ruin the joke. 0.94

00:44:06.420 Yeah, he's knocked it. The trouble is, if you try to ban anything along these lines, you get this.

00:44:17.300 So Great Britain is giving us the clearest lesson on why you shouldn't be that way.

00:44:24.340 I mean, this is the clearest. It removes all doubt about which is the better system. There's no

00:44:32.100 ambiguity about this. What Great Britain is saying. And by the way, let me make this personal. You might

00:44:40.260 know that I've said some things that other people have interpreted as being over the line. Now, I didn't

00:44:48.980 actually ever say anything that was over the line, but I was widely canceled for other people's opinion

00:44:56.900 opinion of what my opinion was. Is that fair? Those of you who've been following my story, my

00:45:06.340 characterizing that well, I didn't get canceled for my opinion. In fact, I've never found anybody who disagreed

00:45:12.660 with me yet. Never. Nobody. Not even one person. But I've had lots of people who believe I was saying or

00:45:21.860 thinking something I wasn't saying and thinking. And they were mad about that thing that they imagined

00:45:27.300 I did. And they were so unified in their belief that this thing that didn't happen did happen,

00:45:34.500 that I was canceled worldwide. Lost my entire reputation and business. Now, what would happen if I

00:45:44.340 if I pull into Heathrow and they look at my, you know, my history and then they believe what other

00:45:51.460 people believed about it? Would they say, aha, this horrible speech monster is coming into our

00:45:58.420 country. We're going to have to arrest them. And would they have grounds? You know, this is not

00:46:05.140 hypothetical. This is like a genuine real world problem. So what would I do? You know, what would be my

00:46:12.260 smartest move if I don't know I would be arrested for someone else's opinion of what my opinion was

00:46:21.940 that wasn't my opinion? I could go to fucking jail for that. It looks like. Now, I would love it if 0.99

00:46:29.620 somebody said that's not true because of this reason or that reason it wouldn't apply to you.

00:46:34.180 But I'll tell you, I wouldn't ever go there. As long as there's a comedian who got arrested for

00:46:40.020 something he said on social media, I don't care what that was. You know what I mean?

00:46:46.740 It doesn't really matter what that was. That's enough for me to say, I'm never going near that

00:46:52.020 place. There must be something that somebody can misinterpret as being over the line. I would never

00:46:59.060 go into a system that was designed that way. It's just not safe.

00:47:02.820 So that's the end of Great Britain or the UK or whatever they want to call themselves.

00:47:12.340 That whole England, UK, Great Britain thing. It's like way too complicated. Could you make that easier?

00:47:19.300 Well, meanwhile, in Chicago, or you could call it Chicago, this weekend, 54 people were shot

00:47:28.580 and seven killed. Now, I will grant you it was a three-day weekend. And I assume they're counting

00:47:36.660 all three days. 54 people? 54 people were shot. How many people were shot in Gaza?

00:47:48.340 How many? I mean, literally, are there days when more people get shot in Chicago than in a hot war?

00:47:55.700 I'll bet there are, you know, individual days. So, oh my God, Chicago. Stay away from Chicago.

00:48:04.980 Does anybody disagree? No. Nobody disagrees with that opinion, that you should stay away from Chicago.

00:48:14.420 I'd probably get arrested in the UK for saying stay away from Chicago.

00:48:19.620 Well, Trump has posted on Truth a complimentary, I guess, monologue on D.C. Mayor Bowser.

00:48:34.180 So, you might know that D.C. Mayor Bowser started out by being positive about Trump helping with crime in her city.

00:48:42.020 And then for a while, she sort of tried to backtrack a little bit and be a little critical.

00:48:49.060 But then in the end, she fully embraced him and said some good words in public and seems to be completely on board.

00:48:57.060 And what that caused was Trump to do a very complimentary piece on it.

00:49:02.020 He called her the very popular D.C. Mayor.

00:49:06.180 And so, New York Post is writing about this, by the way.

00:49:10.500 And he praised her, Mayor Muriel Bowser, for cooperating.

00:49:16.880 And he said, wow, Mayor Muriel Bowser of D.C. has become very popular because she worked with me and my great people and bringing crime down to virtually nothing.

00:49:27.000 And blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:49:28.980 He said her statements and actions were positive instead of others, like he mentions Pritzker and Westmore and Newscom, he calls them, etc.

00:49:41.240 Now, here's your persuasion lesson for the day.

00:49:45.280 This is a lesson which I've given you before.

00:49:48.140 But every time you see an example of it, it helps you internalize it.

00:49:53.620 Right.

00:49:54.100 The persuasion lesson is this.

00:49:55.960 You want to create the largest gap between making you happy and making you unhappy.

00:50:04.160 That's what he's doing with the Muriel Bowser thing.

00:50:08.940 Trump went immediately from a critic to, my God, the most popular mayor.

00:50:15.520 You're great.

00:50:17.480 And that's what everybody's observing.

00:50:20.060 So the observers are saying to themselves, let me see, if I go against him, like Pritzker, he's going to insult me physically, you know, my look, my intelligence, my honesty.

00:50:34.120 He might actually just destroy me the way he has so many other people, such as Jeb Bush.

00:50:40.220 So it looks like it's a really, really, really bad idea to go against Trump because he can primary you, he can insult you, and he can give you a nickname that will never go away.

00:50:54.140 He can really hurt you, and that's even before he was president.

00:50:58.660 He just had the persuasive ability.

00:51:00.580 But if you take a chance of working with him to get something useful done, he's going to tell the whole world that you worked with him and you're a genius and you're the best mayor that's ever been there.

00:51:17.320 So that's the largest difference between make you happy and make you unhappy, and he broadcasts it.

00:51:24.220 So by his actions, everybody sees that this is, you know, very certainly the case, right?

00:51:29.860 You can see that he does this intentionally.

00:51:32.500 It's very powerful.

00:51:36.300 Well, according to the Hill, Tara Suter is writing about, did you know, I'll bet most of you didn't even know this,

00:51:43.400 that thousands of people were protesting on Monday, protesting against President Trump and billionaires.

00:51:52.880 Were you aware of the anti-Trump, anti-billionaire protests in, according to May Day Strong, who organized it,

00:52:04.820 that there were a thousand protests around the country in more than 900 cities?

00:52:10.460 I guess some cities had more than one protest.

00:52:13.400 And the big push that's backed by the AFL-CIO is dubbed workers over billionaires.

00:52:23.060 Okay.

00:52:23.640 Did any of you even notice that there were a thousand protests on Monday?

00:52:30.500 Anybody?

00:52:33.900 There was a protest in my little East Bay, California town.

00:52:39.620 Apparently, there was quite a number of people who were dressed in Palestinian garb, marching in even my town, which is surprising.

00:52:49.120 But I didn't see it.

00:52:53.880 So my take on it is that this is the most low-energy, generic, artificial protest I've ever seen.

00:53:02.880 May I summarize the total effect of a thousand protests around the country against...

00:53:08.120 Oh, excuse me.

00:53:10.960 Oh, I've got to yawn.

00:53:14.440 Against Trump and billionaires.

00:53:19.280 Okay, that's just generic.

00:53:21.660 Guys, are you even trying?

00:53:24.940 Is this the best you've got on the anti-Trump side?

00:53:29.180 We'll do a thousand protests.

00:53:31.480 Yes, some of them will be five people, low-energy.

00:53:35.400 Well, I don't even know if it was in the news, barely.

00:53:39.620 All right.

00:53:42.500 The Airbnb co-founder, Joe Gebbia, who is one of the people who helped on Doge, by the way,

00:53:49.900 but he tells us about his transition from being a lifelong Democrat to a Trump backer.

00:53:56.300 And he talks about how Trump's approach to the border was the main thing that sold him,

00:54:05.700 because he just thought it was insane that you would open the border.

00:54:10.640 And imagine being a billionaire, you know, founding Airbnb,

00:54:15.520 and knowing that it was just being destroyed by opening the border, along with everything else.

00:54:21.720 But, you know, so apparently that got him interested enough to sort of look into the whole Trump phenomenon a little deeper.

00:54:32.200 And he liked that RFK Jr. was part of the package.

00:54:35.960 He liked that Elon Musk was going to get involved and put it all together and decided to work on Doge, et cetera.

00:54:44.620 But here's what I want to add to this story.

00:54:47.080 Do you believe that the Airbnb co-founder would have been able to publicly support Trump

00:54:55.660 unless the fine people hoax had been debunked?

00:55:01.260 Could a CEO go public as pro-Trump while the fine people hoax was still raging?

00:55:09.680 I don't think so.

00:55:10.980 And I've told you before that the fine people hoax has been named by both Joe Rogan and Elon Musk

00:55:17.900 as something that kind of turned him.

00:55:22.420 It made it that the reason that the fine people hoax was so important

00:55:26.760 is that respected people could never back Trump as long as that was out there.

00:55:35.380 Everything else they could deal with, if they didn't like a policy or something,

00:55:38.700 you could deal with that, but you couldn't deal with the reputational destruction

00:55:43.060 of saying you were going to back the guy who, according to the hoax,

00:55:47.980 had complimented neo-Nazis.

00:55:51.120 So I'll harken back to the time I told you that I would help destroy that hoax

00:55:56.260 with the good work of Steve Cortez and Joel Pollack and Greg Goffeld

00:56:02.480 and a number of people who we just hammered on that thing

00:56:05.800 until eventually even Snopes said it was a hoax.

00:56:09.360 That's the current situation.

00:56:11.140 But to me, if you look at how RFK Jr. and Musk,

00:56:17.200 their acceptance of Trump's policies

00:56:20.980 made it easier for the Airbnb founder to move in that direction.

00:56:26.480 So he's confirming that that's the case.

00:56:28.440 So do you see the dominoes?

00:56:32.060 And I told you that the fine people hoax was what I call the tentpole hoax.

00:56:38.920 If you got rid of that, it would allow respected people to say,

00:56:43.780 all right, let's take the good policies I like.

00:56:46.760 Because the respected people wanted to close the border.

00:56:50.220 They just couldn't say it out loud because it would sound pro-Trump.

00:56:53.440 Now they can.

00:56:53.960 So that's kind of cool.

00:56:59.420 Howard Stern has said he's not coming back to his show this Tuesday.

00:57:04.420 It's a little unclear what his future is

00:57:06.540 because I guess Syria said they wouldn't renew his contract.

00:57:12.000 Was his contract really $100 million a year for five years?

00:57:16.860 I think it was.

00:57:20.080 And over the course of his career,

00:57:23.120 Stern's audience has been as high as 20 million people.

00:57:26.980 And at the moment, it's 125,000 daily listeners.

00:57:32.100 He went from 20 million to 125,000.

00:57:36.380 Now, some large percentage of that is just moving to serious FM exclusively.

00:57:43.860 That probably takes away most of it.

00:57:46.780 But boy, that's a big difference.

00:57:50.200 All right.

00:57:50.980 You want to get scared?

00:57:53.400 Ooh, going to scare you.

00:57:55.620 There is something called the Pentagon Pizza Report,

00:57:59.500 which does report on the traffic in the Domino's and the Papa John's

00:58:04.660 that are closest to the Pentagon.

00:58:06.720 Now, why would you report on the volume of pizza being bought next to the Pentagon?

00:58:13.080 Well, I believe the idea is that if they're buying a lot of pizza,

00:58:17.360 it's because they're working through dinner.

00:58:20.740 And that if you track the pizza,

00:58:22.920 you can find out when the Pentagon is getting ready for some big action

00:58:26.540 because they would all be working through the night and stuff.

00:58:29.420 So, apparently, there's above-average traffic at the Domino's

00:58:35.300 and the Papa John's near the Pentagon as if something's brewing.

00:58:40.840 On top of that, Trump says he's making an announcement

00:58:43.980 from the Oval Office today at 2 p.m. Eastern time.

00:58:48.820 At the same time, we've got military in Venezuela.

00:58:53.240 We've got the president saying he's going after the cartels.

00:58:56.420 And we've got the ever-present Ukraine-Russia war.

00:59:00.960 And who knows?

00:59:02.080 I don't think Taiwan's going to be invaded by China this week.

00:59:05.760 But there's a lot of war-ish stuff that's just sort of in the atmosphere.

00:59:13.700 It's just enough to worry you.

00:59:15.600 But on top of that, France has apparently put out the order domestically

00:59:20.000 for the hospitals to prepare for war.

00:59:22.980 Now, the way they're explaining it is that that would be more normal.

00:59:29.600 They should always be having a plan that if there were mass casualties from a war

00:59:34.440 that they would know how to handle it just in case.

00:59:36.700 So, it's more of a just-in-case thing.

00:59:39.680 But still, if France is preparing for a land war in Europe

00:59:44.480 and we've got ships around Venezuela and the cartels are active

00:59:50.320 and Russia and Ukraine are going on

00:59:52.320 and the Pentagon's ordering more pizza

00:59:55.700 and the Trump's got an announcement today,

00:59:58.480 it makes you wonder if there's anything brewing.

01:00:02.840 I'm going to say probably not.

01:00:09.520 Probably not.

01:00:10.780 But it is weird that there are a number of signals in that direction.

01:00:15.220 So, we'll see.

01:00:17.080 The Trump announcement could be anything, really.

01:00:19.560 He's so good at getting attention

01:00:21.260 and, you know, teasing things.

01:00:23.620 It really could be anything.

01:00:24.440 Well, as you know, a number of leaders are in China

01:00:30.480 and cozying up to President Xi.

01:00:35.820 But apparently, Putin and India's Modi

01:00:38.720 seem to be a little extra chummy in China.

01:00:42.500 People are wondering about that.

01:00:44.300 I guess India buys their military equipment

01:00:47.340 and a lot of the oil from Russia.

01:00:49.600 And even their weapons industry in India

01:00:54.440 is based on the Russian models.

01:00:57.020 So, they need the Russian parts 1.00

01:00:59.800 and help to even have a weapons industry.

01:01:03.840 So, but it looks like there are a whole bunch of countries

01:01:07.040 that coincidentally are not pro-America

01:01:09.660 that are trying to send the message

01:01:12.080 that they're all good buddies.

01:01:13.920 I don't know if a coalition of dictators like that

01:01:17.760 can really hang together

01:01:18.800 because it seems like it'd be hard to trust any of them.

01:01:22.900 But Russia's biggest gas company, Gasprom,

01:01:26.360 is signing a pipeline deal,

01:01:29.520 put a pipeline through Siberia to Mongolia.

01:01:35.680 So, I would say that the chessboard

01:01:39.040 is moving quite a bit.

01:01:42.340 And I'm kind of impressed by the BRICS countries

01:01:45.500 and even this meeting here.

01:01:47.940 It does seem like there is a hardening

01:01:53.120 of the anti-American position.

01:01:56.800 And I would not ignore that

01:01:59.120 because it's starting to look serious.

01:02:01.720 I wasn't too worried about BRICS until recently,

01:02:04.820 the BRICS organization.

01:02:06.860 But I would be worried if India gets cleaved off

01:02:12.660 and gets into more of Russia and China's,

01:02:16.820 probably Russia,

01:02:18.320 Russia's orbit.

01:02:19.580 That would worry me.

01:02:21.460 But I am impressed with Modi.

01:02:24.240 India's Modi.

01:02:25.640 He's a smart player and he knows when not to cause trouble

01:02:29.420 and when to be friends.

01:02:30.480 And I feel like he could pull off, you know,

01:02:33.600 being friends with everybody if he wants to.

01:02:36.400 It looks like he is.

01:02:37.240 In other news,

01:02:41.920 there's a new AI product

01:02:43.620 called

01:02:45.320 Hoon One World Voyager or something.

01:02:50.100 And it's an AI in which it creates,

01:02:52.540 I think, infinite worlds.

01:02:55.920 If I understand it correctly.

01:02:57.520 I saw a bunch of examples.

01:02:58.700 That's what it looks like.

01:02:59.940 So in other words,

01:03:00.760 you could tell your AI to create you,

01:03:03.300 I don't know,

01:03:04.340 an early history,

01:03:09.580 let's say,

01:03:12.760 primitive dwellings or something,

01:03:15.140 just like a video game.

01:03:16.680 And you could walk through the streets

01:03:18.200 of whatever you told it to create forever.

01:03:21.260 And it would just create new streets

01:03:23.080 or remember what the old ones were

01:03:25.040 and you could go back to them.

01:03:26.800 Now,

01:03:27.640 if you can create

01:03:28.940 an on-demand simulation

01:03:31.440 where no matter where the characters go

01:03:34.120 or wherever you go,

01:03:35.840 it just creates new landscape

01:03:37.660 and it remembers it.

01:03:40.020 So you could come back later.

01:03:42.020 What does that tell you is going to happen?

01:03:44.160 Well,

01:03:44.820 let me predict.

01:03:47.940 If it becomes

01:03:49.220 a routine

01:03:50.940 to be able to create

01:03:52.240 entire infinite environments

01:03:54.180 of all kinds of different kinds,

01:03:56.560 it's guaranteed

01:03:57.580 that somebody's

01:03:59.160 going to populate them

01:04:00.280 with avatars

01:04:02.160 or characters.

01:04:03.480 You might call them agents.

01:04:05.700 But they'd be

01:04:06.300 AI-run

01:04:08.420 little characters.

01:04:09.780 Now,

01:04:10.040 some of them

01:04:10.460 could be NPCs,

01:04:12.240 meaning that

01:04:13.020 they don't have

01:04:13.660 an internal

01:04:14.360 voice

01:04:15.600 and they,

01:04:16.900 that doesn't mean

01:04:18.680 you're an NPC

01:04:19.320 if you don't have

01:04:20.340 an internal voice.

01:04:21.080 but they,

01:04:23.320 they wouldn't be

01:04:24.260 main characters

01:04:25.020 and there would be

01:04:25.560 some main characters

01:04:26.520 in there.

01:04:27.060 But you could program

01:04:28.080 the main characters

01:04:29.120 to act

01:04:30.780 as though

01:04:32.340 they believe

01:04:33.280 that they are

01:04:34.200 the base

01:04:35.000 reality

01:04:36.000 and that they do not

01:04:37.460 understand that they are

01:04:38.480 a simulation.

01:04:39.300 They think that's

01:04:40.000 the real world

01:04:40.700 and they would live

01:04:42.080 their life.

01:04:43.300 You may be in a

01:04:44.060 sped up time even,

01:04:45.580 but they can live

01:04:46.480 their whole life

01:04:47.100 believing that they have

01:04:48.000 consciousness

01:04:48.600 and free will

01:04:49.540 and that they are

01:04:50.680 the base reality.

01:04:52.400 Now,

01:04:53.000 when that happens,

01:04:54.440 and I guarantee

01:04:55.460 it's going to happen,

01:04:57.060 there's a 100% chance

01:04:58.500 that's going to happen.

01:04:59.880 There's somebody

01:05:00.260 who will make

01:05:00.620 little characters

01:05:01.340 that believe they're real

01:05:02.400 and act like they're real

01:05:03.720 and everything else.

01:05:06.040 What will that tell you

01:05:07.200 about our base reality?

01:05:09.800 It's going to get

01:05:10.720 a little bit dicey

01:05:11.780 believing that

01:05:13.320 you're not a simulation

01:05:14.540 because the evidence

01:05:16.300 for us being a simulation

01:05:17.900 is largely

01:05:19.620 going to be based

01:05:21.100 on whether we

01:05:21.800 could make one

01:05:22.560 that we knew

01:05:23.640 was a simulation

01:05:24.480 but the people

01:05:25.160 in it did not.

01:05:26.800 And there's now

01:05:28.300 a 100% chance

01:05:29.440 we'll be able

01:05:29.960 to do that

01:05:30.580 maybe in a year.

01:05:33.320 You know,

01:05:33.560 I wouldn't bet

01:05:34.080 on a year,

01:05:35.260 but three years?

01:05:36.860 Five years?

01:05:38.100 You don't think

01:05:39.040 in five years

01:05:40.080 there will be

01:05:40.700 simulated realities

01:05:42.020 that we could use

01:05:43.480 to, I don't know,

01:05:44.920 learn something

01:05:45.620 or explore something?

01:05:47.900 You know,

01:05:48.540 I've told you

01:05:49.100 that I have

01:05:49.580 so many problems

01:05:50.220 with water leaks

01:05:52.480 that if I'm a simulation,

01:05:55.240 I believe I was created

01:05:56.280 by a plumbing company

01:05:57.720 to figure out

01:05:59.600 the best way

01:06:00.200 to approach

01:06:00.780 lots of different leaks

01:06:02.200 because they're all unique

01:06:03.680 and they're big ones

01:06:04.900 and bad ones.

01:06:05.720 You know,

01:06:05.840 they're never easy.

01:06:07.400 And all you'd have to do

01:06:09.480 is create the simulation

01:06:10.760 and then introduce

01:06:13.280 a whole bunch

01:06:13.840 of different leak

01:06:14.780 possibilities

01:06:15.960 that match

01:06:16.780 what the real world,

01:06:17.900 their base reality

01:06:18.700 would have

01:06:19.120 and then just let me

01:06:20.980 try to solve them

01:06:22.400 in a time period

01:06:24.200 that I thought

01:06:25.040 was years

01:06:25.880 but the simulation

01:06:27.620 could complete

01:06:28.580 in a second.

01:06:30.780 So they run

01:06:31.660 the simulation,

01:06:32.620 they make me live

01:06:33.440 an entire life

01:06:34.340 fixing problem

01:06:35.320 after problem

01:06:35.960 that's related

01:06:37.080 to leaks

01:06:37.640 and then

01:06:38.640 they check it later

01:06:39.980 and see if the AI

01:06:41.620 has learned something

01:06:42.580 that it could not

01:06:43.680 have learned

01:06:44.160 from humans

01:06:45.460 because it wasn't

01:06:46.240 the right kind

01:06:46.700 of training data.

01:06:47.760 You had to create

01:06:48.540 a world

01:06:49.120 to create training data.

01:06:52.320 Maybe.

01:06:53.720 So that's my theory.

01:06:58.380 Did you lock

01:06:59.140 the front door?

01:06:59.780 Check.

01:07:00.320 Close the garage door?

01:07:01.500 Yep.

01:07:01.980 Installed window sensors,

01:07:03.060 smoke sensors,

01:07:03.740 and HD cameras

01:07:04.560 with night vision?

01:07:05.480 No.

01:07:06.340 And you set up

01:07:06.880 credit card transactions?

01:07:07.640 alerts at secure VPN

01:07:08.700 for a private connection

01:07:09.600 and continuous monitoring

01:07:10.720 for our personal info

01:07:11.500 on the dark web?

01:07:12.820 Uh, I'm looking into it?

01:07:15.360 Stress less about security.

01:07:17.080 Choose security solutions

01:07:18.180 from Telus

01:07:18.780 for peace of mind

01:07:19.540 at home and online.

01:07:21.240 Visit telus.com

01:07:22.320 slash total security

01:07:23.400 to learn more.

01:07:24.480 Conditions apply.

01:07:27.620 Well,

01:07:28.340 Putin is mocking

01:07:31.960 the people

01:07:32.500 who think that Russia

01:07:33.320 is getting ready

01:07:33.980 for some kind

01:07:34.560 of big land war

01:07:35.580 in Europe.

01:07:36.260 and I like

01:07:37.980 the fact

01:07:38.360 that he's mocking it.

01:07:40.000 He shrugged it off

01:07:41.060 as hysteria.

01:07:42.960 Do you believe

01:07:43.680 there's any chance

01:07:44.780 that Russia 0.72

01:07:47.180 would want to move

01:07:49.300 into either Germany

01:07:50.520 or France?

01:07:52.000 They might try

01:07:52.940 to pick off

01:07:53.580 a Baltic company

01:07:54.720 country or something,

01:07:56.100 but I don't know.

01:07:57.280 So who knows?

01:07:58.900 Anything's possible.

01:08:00.720 Remember,

01:08:01.180 I kept telling you

01:08:01.940 that the Ukraine war

01:08:03.640 is going to turn

01:08:04.320 into an all-robot war.

01:08:06.300 Well,

01:08:06.860 apparently we're getting

01:08:07.640 really close to that

01:08:08.680 because unbeknownst to me,

01:08:11.940 but now the Wall Street Journal

01:08:13.300 is reporting,

01:08:14.620 that Ukraine 0.91

01:08:15.680 is already using

01:08:16.900 AI-driven drone swarms.

01:08:22.540 Now,

01:08:23.180 if you could have

01:08:23.840 an AI-driven drone swarm,

01:08:26.280 the AI could decide

01:08:27.440 whether to shoot somebody

01:08:28.640 or blow up something 0.96

01:08:29.620 or not.

01:08:30.620 It might get it wrong,

01:08:31.920 but so do the people.

01:08:34.280 I don't know

01:08:34.720 if it would get it wrong

01:08:35.520 more than the humans.

01:08:36.780 Maybe it would be less.

01:08:38.720 But they apparently have,

01:08:40.860 they've been using

01:08:42.600 probably over 100 drone attacks

01:08:45.240 and they've been doing it

01:08:46.180 for a while.

01:08:47.060 And the new software

01:08:48.240 would allow them

01:08:48.920 to send out,

01:08:49.580 let's say,

01:08:49.940 three drones

01:08:50.800 and if one of them

01:08:52.960 got disabled,

01:08:54.380 the other two

01:08:55.000 could pick up its mission

01:08:56.200 and somehow the drones,

01:08:58.600 by contacting each other,

01:09:00.100 can figure out

01:09:01.820 a lot more

01:09:02.360 of what's going on

01:09:03.340 and adjust.

01:09:05.500 But the software

01:09:06.800 that they're currently using

01:09:08.160 could go up to 25 drones.

01:09:11.020 So in theory,

01:09:12.300 we're very close.

01:09:13.460 I don't know

01:09:13.800 if we're there yet,

01:09:15.220 but we're very close

01:09:16.240 to being able to say,

01:09:17.920 all right,

01:09:18.780 this little area

01:09:19.680 that's controlled

01:09:20.420 entirely by a German, 0.94

01:09:22.220 I'm sorry,

01:09:22.700 not German,

01:09:24.220 entirely by Russian forces,

01:09:26.320 go fly over there

01:09:28.380 with your 25 drones,

01:09:30.580 look for high-value targets

01:09:32.260 and coordinate an attack

01:09:34.640 and then just let them go

01:09:36.980 and everything will start

01:09:39.560 blowing up

01:09:40.400 that looks like anything

01:09:42.220 that's, you know,

01:09:43.200 serious military stuff.

01:09:45.300 Would it accidentally

01:09:46.200 kill some civilians?

01:09:47.940 Yes. 1.00

01:09:49.220 Exactly like now.

01:09:50.780 So it wouldn't be worse

01:09:52.120 necessarily.

01:09:53.040 All right.

01:09:56.500 China's developed 0.98

01:09:57.500 a 6G chip

01:09:59.100 that's capable

01:10:00.300 of 100 gigabit

01:10:02.000 per second speeds.

01:10:03.780 I saw Rohan Paul

01:10:05.040 writing about that.

01:10:07.880 To which I say,

01:10:09.480 I've long suspected

01:10:10.860 that our belief

01:10:13.020 that China won't be able 0.97

01:10:14.320 to catch up with us

01:10:15.300 in chip making

01:10:16.200 and technology

01:10:16.980 because of some racist reason

01:10:18.780 we always have.

01:10:20.040 You know,

01:10:20.360 so we always have

01:10:20.940 some racist reason.

01:10:22.380 Like, oh, 0.81

01:10:22.860 the Chinese

01:10:23.540 will never be able

01:10:25.080 to innovate.

01:10:26.720 Well,

01:10:27.400 I've never believed that.

01:10:29.780 I've always believed

01:10:30.920 that China 0.93

01:10:31.740 might be more secretive

01:10:33.280 and the entire time

01:10:35.000 we're thinking,

01:10:35.700 uh-huh,

01:10:36.180 they'll never catch up

01:10:37.160 with their microchip technology

01:10:39.240 that they've already caught up

01:10:40.980 and that they're just

01:10:42.240 not revealing it yet.

01:10:44.000 Well,

01:10:44.360 this 100 gigabit

01:10:46.020 per second chip,

01:10:47.040 so that would make

01:10:50.920 your mobile devices,

01:10:52.260 you know,

01:10:52.560 way faster,

01:10:53.320 et cetera.

01:10:55.060 That would suggest

01:10:56.360 that they have

01:10:57.340 very good chip making

01:10:58.480 capabilities

01:10:59.200 and maybe better

01:11:01.020 than we assume.

01:11:02.580 So,

01:11:03.200 keep an eye on that.

01:11:04.200 and then

01:11:07.980 some publication

01:11:09.880 called

01:11:10.240 the Brussels Signal

01:11:11.420 is reporting

01:11:12.220 that

01:11:12.540 one of

01:11:13.640 China's big 0.98

01:11:14.780 economic problems,

01:11:16.580 and I'm not sure

01:11:17.240 how much to believe this,

01:11:18.640 is that the

01:11:19.460 domestic people

01:11:20.420 don't spend

01:11:21.020 a lot of money,

01:11:21.720 so they don't have

01:11:22.460 a domestic

01:11:23.100 market,

01:11:25.780 basically,

01:11:26.280 big enough

01:11:26.820 to support

01:11:27.520 what they want to do.

01:11:28.220 So,

01:11:28.960 the Chinese citizens

01:11:30.100 are very conservative

01:11:31.200 with their money,

01:11:32.500 so they like to

01:11:33.860 pack it away

01:11:34.440 and save it

01:11:35.240 instead of spending it,

01:11:36.900 but the economy

01:11:37.660 requires spending

01:11:38.640 to,

01:11:39.220 you know,

01:11:39.860 keep everybody afloat.

01:11:41.380 So,

01:11:41.640 China's trying to 0.98

01:11:42.640 manipulate their public

01:11:43.960 to be more spendy,

01:11:46.020 but the public says,

01:11:47.540 I'm not sure

01:11:48.020 I trust this system enough

01:11:49.840 that I want to

01:11:51.340 draw down my savings

01:11:52.580 because it's the only way

01:11:53.560 I'll be able to retire.

01:11:55.560 So,

01:11:55.980 I don't know.

01:11:57.020 China's either 0.97

01:11:57.820 on the brink

01:11:58.440 of self-destruction

01:11:59.500 or it's about

01:12:00.220 to dominate the world,

01:12:01.940 and every day

01:12:02.620 there's evidence

01:12:03.200 of both.

01:12:06.200 According to

01:12:06.960 Just the News,

01:12:08.220 Chinese networks

01:12:09.160 are laundering

01:12:09.840 billions of dollars

01:12:11.440 through the U.S.

01:12:14.400 in support

01:12:15.240 of the cartels,

01:12:16.400 but the amount

01:12:17.860 of money

01:12:18.300 is just staggering.

01:12:19.440 So,

01:12:19.620 the Treasury

01:12:20.060 has this

01:12:20.600 financial crimes

01:12:21.620 enforcement network,

01:12:22.980 and they said

01:12:23.760 that banks

01:12:24.500 have flagged

01:12:25.580 312 billion

01:12:27.440 in transactions

01:12:28.860 from suspected

01:12:29.940 Chinese money

01:12:31.280 laundering networks.

01:12:34.440 Wow.

01:12:35.580 So,

01:12:36.400 the good news is

01:12:37.680 that the Trump

01:12:38.780 administration

01:12:39.480 and probably

01:12:40.300 Scott Besant

01:12:41.600 and maybe others

01:12:42.420 are getting

01:12:43.840 real serious

01:12:44.720 about tracing

01:12:45.620 the evil

01:12:47.180 money.

01:12:48.600 So,

01:12:48.960 that might have

01:12:49.500 more to do

01:12:50.100 with shutting down

01:12:50.760 the cartels

01:12:51.380 than anything else

01:12:52.260 that happens.

01:12:52.960 It might be a money,

01:12:54.560 tracking the money

01:12:55.920 problem.

01:12:57.960 Well,

01:12:58.520 in Germany,

01:13:00.980 there's a

01:13:01.760 right-wing party

01:13:03.840 that's gaining

01:13:04.460 popularity,

01:13:05.400 the AFD

01:13:06.320 party,

01:13:07.800 and apparently

01:13:08.760 in their biggest,

01:13:10.260 is it,

01:13:10.740 what do they call it,

01:13:11.540 state or

01:13:12.580 province?

01:13:14.940 I don't know

01:13:15.340 what it's called,

01:13:16.320 but there were

01:13:18.120 four of their

01:13:19.020 candidates

01:13:19.460 that died

01:13:20.240 suddenly and

01:13:20.960 unexpectedly

01:13:21.620 before a

01:13:23.060 major state

01:13:24.000 election.

01:13:26.200 Four members

01:13:27.140 of the same

01:13:27.740 party,

01:13:28.600 and only one

01:13:29.560 of them was

01:13:29.980 even over 70,

01:13:31.840 died unexpectedly

01:13:33.020 and suddenly.

01:13:36.940 Does that feel

01:13:37.860 like a coincidence

01:13:38.680 to you?

01:13:39.600 It might be.

01:13:40.340 We're still waiting

01:13:40.960 for information

01:13:41.800 on that,

01:13:42.360 but that didn't

01:13:43.540 look,

01:13:44.840 it makes me

01:13:45.380 wonder if the

01:13:45.900 story is real.

01:13:47.080 Maybe the story

01:13:47.720 is fake.

01:13:48.260 I don't know.

01:13:48.580 Well,

01:13:51.180 I almost

01:13:52.280 didn't believe

01:13:52.800 this was real

01:13:53.620 because it

01:13:54.560 wasn't much

01:13:55.220 of a big

01:13:55.660 story that

01:13:56.900 Israel

01:13:57.340 assassinated

01:13:58.120 the prime

01:13:58.620 minister

01:13:59.080 of Yemen.

01:14:06.280 That really

01:14:07.480 happened,

01:14:07.940 right?

01:14:08.880 That they

01:14:09.600 took out

01:14:10.060 the leader

01:14:10.600 of a country?

01:14:12.400 And I feel

01:14:13.120 like I didn't

01:14:14.780 really see much

01:14:15.740 news about it.

01:14:17.180 I think it

01:14:17.800 happened.

01:14:18.580 Right?

01:14:19.840 It's kind of

01:14:20.420 weirdly,

01:14:21.300 you know,

01:14:22.640 blacked out

01:14:23.160 of the news.

01:14:24.520 Anyway,

01:14:25.400 so I might

01:14:26.060 be wrong

01:14:26.500 about some

01:14:26.960 detail of that.

01:14:27.920 Maybe it was

01:14:28.820 just the

01:14:29.240 Houthi leader

01:14:29.980 and not the

01:14:30.540 Yemen leader

01:14:31.140 or something

01:14:31.660 like that.

01:14:33.080 There's something

01:14:33.800 about that

01:14:34.360 that doesn't

01:14:34.820 make sense.

01:14:36.920 But,

01:14:37.260 anyway.

01:14:42.560 And now

01:14:43.280 the most

01:14:43.720 important news

01:14:44.500 of the day.

01:14:46.300 Everything

01:14:46.820 else was sort

01:14:47.700 of a preparation

01:14:48.440 for this.

01:14:49.700 The most

01:14:50.260 important news

01:14:50.840 of the day

01:14:51.220 is that my

01:14:51.740 book,

01:14:52.160 Loser Think,

01:14:53.160 the second

01:14:53.740 edition,

01:14:54.880 is now

01:14:55.660 available on

01:14:56.560 Amazon.

01:14:57.260 It's only on

01:14:57.760 Amazon.

01:14:58.800 And I'm still

01:14:59.680 working on the

01:15:00.700 audio book,

01:15:01.660 which will be a

01:15:02.680 different audio

01:15:03.640 expert, not me.

01:15:06.420 So it won't be

01:15:07.140 my voice.

01:15:08.120 So if you're

01:15:09.300 waiting for my

01:15:09.920 voice, don't 0.72

01:15:10.460 wait.

01:15:10.760 but you can

01:15:13.240 get it in

01:15:13.980 hardcover and

01:15:15.140 softcover and

01:15:16.200 Kindle.

01:15:17.540 And it's the

01:15:18.240 same book as

01:15:19.720 the first

01:15:20.260 edition, but

01:15:21.520 the first

01:15:21.920 edition got

01:15:22.540 canceled when I

01:15:23.340 got canceled.

01:15:24.180 So it's just

01:15:24.760 putting it back

01:15:25.560 in play.

01:15:26.380 And that

01:15:26.640 means that now

01:15:27.740 there's second

01:15:28.280 editions of

01:15:29.160 Win Bigley.

01:15:29.980 This is actually

01:15:30.880 the first edition.

01:15:31.860 I couldn't find

01:15:32.380 my copy of the

01:15:33.060 second edition.

01:15:34.100 The one you

01:15:34.460 want to buy

01:15:35.060 if you're looking

01:15:36.360 for Win Bigley

01:15:37.180 is the one

01:15:37.900 with the blue

01:15:38.400 cover.

01:15:39.480 So this is the

01:15:40.260 first edition.

01:15:41.980 And then

01:15:42.320 Reframe Your

01:15:43.000 Brain, if you

01:15:43.980 haven't seen the

01:15:44.580 reviews for this,

01:15:45.960 it's unbelievable.

01:15:48.560 I did not

01:15:49.920 expect that this

01:15:50.960 would be my

01:15:51.480 best reviewed

01:15:52.360 book of all

01:15:53.100 time, but it

01:15:54.440 is, and better

01:15:55.560 reviewed than

01:15:56.100 almost any book

01:15:57.060 you'll ever see.

01:15:58.220 So this one's

01:15:58.920 changing the

01:15:59.660 world, changing

01:16:00.840 people's lives

01:16:01.560 quite a bit,

01:16:02.180 actually.

01:16:04.060 Then my

01:16:04.600 very influential

01:16:07.140 book, How to

01:16:07.860 Fill Almost

01:16:08.320 Everything

01:16:08.680 is Still

01:16:09.060 Win Big, also

01:16:09.920 second edition,

01:16:11.160 also available.

01:16:13.320 And my

01:16:13.920 God's Debris,

01:16:15.280 which I

01:16:15.720 combined three,

01:16:17.460 well, two

01:16:17.860 books plus a

01:16:18.700 short story into

01:16:19.740 one larger book

01:16:21.020 called God's

01:16:21.700 Debris, The

01:16:22.060 Complete Works,

01:16:23.000 now available

01:16:23.760 at Amazon.

01:16:25.080 So if you

01:16:26.320 like fiction and

01:16:28.100 a little bit of

01:16:29.520 sci-fi and

01:16:30.180 philosophy and

01:16:30.820 religion, God's 0.98

01:16:32.320 Debris is your

01:16:32.860 book.

01:16:33.600 That one's just

01:16:34.120 for fun.

01:16:35.520 If you want to

01:16:36.680 change your

01:16:37.120 career or you're

01:16:38.260 stuck in a rut or

01:16:39.960 you want to give

01:16:40.500 advice to somebody

01:16:41.460 who's stuck in a

01:16:42.240 rut, then my

01:16:42.980 book, How to

01:16:43.440 Fill and Almost

01:16:44.140 Everything and

01:16:44.640 Still Win Big, would

01:16:46.200 be the gift item

01:16:47.120 you're looking for

01:16:47.920 or for yourself.

01:16:49.340 Reframe your

01:16:49.940 brain if you've

01:16:50.700 got, if you just

01:16:51.760 want to tune your

01:16:52.800 brain to be more

01:16:54.380 efficient and happy

01:16:55.400 and that, you'll

01:16:57.240 find probably some

01:16:58.220 reframes, which is

01:16:59.980 just a different way

01:17:00.720 of thinking of

01:17:01.340 something that makes

01:17:02.000 it more productive.

01:17:03.720 Win Bigly, if you

01:17:04.520 want to learn about

01:17:05.360 persuasion, learn

01:17:07.040 the tricks that

01:17:07.820 Trump uses, as

01:17:09.000 explained by me, but

01:17:11.060 again, not the one

01:17:12.060 with the black 0.54

01:17:12.580 cover, you want the

01:17:13.500 one with the blue

01:17:14.180 cover, the second

01:17:15.160 edition. 0.98

01:17:16.660 And then Loser

01:17:17.340 Think is about

01:17:19.240 unproductive ways of

01:17:20.860 thinking, which is

01:17:22.280 what I give you on a

01:17:24.820 lot of the podcasts.

01:17:26.080 So when I'm talking

01:17:26.780 about why analogies

01:17:29.380 are not thinking, I

01:17:31.140 know a lot of you

01:17:31.720 disagree, but you

01:17:32.820 want to read my

01:17:33.420 argument about it

01:17:34.220 before you make up

01:17:35.240 your mind.

01:17:36.520 And other poor

01:17:38.440 ways of thinking,

01:17:40.180 this book will set

01:17:42.540 you free so that

01:17:43.860 you won't make

01:17:44.460 those problems, but

01:17:46.000 you'll also be able

01:17:46.760 to identify them

01:17:47.800 in other people.

01:17:50.700 All right.

01:17:52.800 So ladies and

01:17:54.040 gentlemen, oh, also

01:17:56.060 it's not available

01:17:57.360 yet, but the

01:17:58.660 2026 Dilbert

01:18:00.320 calendar will be

01:18:02.220 available.

01:18:02.660 This time it will

01:18:03.840 be on Amazon, so

01:18:05.200 if you've got

01:18:05.700 Prime, you can get

01:18:06.560 your free shipping.

01:18:07.560 That was when we

01:18:09.000 did it without

01:18:09.520 Amazon.

01:18:11.500 People balked at

01:18:12.620 the shipping because

01:18:13.380 you can't match

01:18:14.020 free shipping.

01:18:16.400 But this year is

01:18:17.620 too early.

01:18:18.380 It's not listed yet,

01:18:19.720 but the work is

01:18:21.380 done.

01:18:21.840 So we've designed

01:18:22.620 it.

01:18:23.060 We're getting ready

01:18:24.100 to print it.

01:18:25.760 All right.

01:18:26.100 It's all made in 1.00

01:18:26.720 America too.

01:18:27.780 America made.

01:18:30.980 And that is all

01:18:33.720 I ask of you.

01:18:35.960 Just find one of

01:18:37.280 those things that

01:18:37.900 you think you'll

01:18:38.480 like, and then

01:18:39.720 we're both happy.

01:18:41.120 All right.

01:18:41.580 I'm going to talk

01:18:42.280 privately to the

01:18:43.640 fine people and

01:18:45.360 locals, the beloved

01:18:47.020 members of locals,

01:18:48.340 the rest of you.

01:18:49.180 Thanks for putting up

01:18:49.960 with me for an hour.

01:18:51.580 Thanks for joining

01:18:52.620 and I will see you

01:18:54.020 same time tomorrow,

01:18:56.040 same place.

01:18:57.540 All right.

01:19:21.580 Bye.

01:19:51.580 Bye.

01:20:21.580 Bye.

01:20:51.580 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 02, 2025

Episode 2946 CWSA 09⧸02⧸25

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript