Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2962 CWSA 09⧸18⧸25

00:00:00.000 come on in it's time for us to reframe the world that's right we're going to reframe the whole

00:00:08.240 world today i got my comic done for the day but we couldn't load it up to x today yet

00:00:17.600 some kind of technical problem i think it's on their side not mine but i'll try again later

00:00:24.320 all right i'm gonna get my comments coming and then we got the show of shows

00:00:28.960 often described as the best thing that has ever happened to the world

00:00:35.760 guaranteed

00:00:40.080 see let's move that over there yeah that's looking good

00:00:53.520 all right are you ready if you're ready i'm ready

00:00:58.000 good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called

00:01:04.640 coffee with scott adams and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take a chance

00:01:10.880 on elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny

00:01:16.960 human brains all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass of tanker gels with steiner canteen

00:01:23.520 jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for

00:01:30.560 the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here today the thing that makes everything better it's called

00:01:35.440 the simultaneous sip it happens now go

00:01:44.080 i'm trying something different with my lighting today so we'll see if that works

00:01:50.640 all right uh i wonder if there's any science that says that coffee is good for you oh here's some

00:02:00.880 um it turns out there's a new study that says that people who drink coffee

00:02:06.240 have more favorable body composition and inflammatory profiles all right well there's nobody more

00:02:14.240 inflammatory than me so i drink extra coffee just to tamp it down a little bit oh there he goes there he

00:02:21.440 goes he's being inflammatory sip all right well by far my favorite story of the day is that uh uh french 0.80

00:02:33.840 president uh emmanuel macron and his wife um they're gonna you you know that uh candace owens accused uh

00:02:44.720 bridget macron of being born a man uh and believes that he's still a man because i guess that's the way it

00:02:52.640 works and uh so the news is that uh macron and his wife are going to present photographic and scientific

00:03:02.640 evidence to a u.s court to prove the french first lady is in fact a woman

00:03:08.240 photographic evidence and scientific evidence that she's in fact a woman all right now

00:03:20.560 i've i've never quite bought into the idea that she was a man 0.55

00:03:24.320 i was amused by the whole thing and and i was amazed at how much evidence that candace could come 1.00

00:03:32.240 up with that definitely look like it's possible i don't know if you've gone down that rabbit hole at

00:03:39.280 all but if you listen to candace for 30 minutes talking about this you will go away thinking it's

00:03:45.200 real but that's the documentary effect you know if you're if you're exposed to one point of view for

00:03:52.160 half an hour you're probably going to be convinced you know that's all it takes is one point of view

00:03:58.800 with now no counterpoint for half an hour and almost always you'll think it's true

00:04:06.240 so i will say that it's a it's a persuasive argument candace makes that my 0.76

00:04:15.040 my own let's say gut feeling and common sense says probably not probably not but i think it's possible

00:04:22.640 yeah so the fact that she's going to give photographic evidence what exactly would the 0.99

00:04:28.320 photograph be of is is bridget macron gonna be

00:04:37.440 i just have this image of bridget macron she's at home and she's like all right

00:04:43.680 oh i'll do my best french accent i'll try to no that's not french i won't do a french accent

00:04:50.400 all right i need some pictures for the court

00:04:52.720 click click click almost click click click yeah there it is wow that's beautiful so

00:05:08.640 can we um i don't maybe it's just me but i i like to look at these things from the entertainment

00:05:15.600 perspective if you do it from the entertainment perspective and you realize that 0.99

00:05:22.800 that candace owens is making the the wife of the president of france take pictures of her genitalia 0.99

00:05:30.800 standing ovation 0.99

00:05:36.000 standing ovation okay and this

00:05:44.560 i don't know if any of it's true i'm guessing it's not

00:05:48.240 but 0.99

00:05:48.560 but but there's not much that's funnier than making her take a picture of her junk 0.98

00:05:59.200 all right good job candace

00:06:03.600 and other news uh you know that meta has these new uh glasses that have all kinds of functions

00:06:10.880 and i guess they can project a screen on the glasses themselves that people will barely know you're

00:06:17.760 looking at and uh i saw a review somebody who had tried a number of these different you know uh

00:06:25.600 enhanced reality glasses had said that it's the best one you've seen and it's actually kind of awesome

00:06:33.760 it costs about 800 um what do regular glasses cost if you bought regular glasses

00:06:45.120 um if it's like a designer pair this is several hundred dollars isn't it a designer pair so i don't

00:06:52.800 know maybe maybe people will buy a free hundred dollars if they can make those glasses prescription

00:06:59.520 yeah i didn't see in the story that they can do that but i said they can right do you think that

00:07:06.000 they would make them prescription it would be very disappointing if the only thing that glasses

00:07:12.480 couldn't do is correct your vision i feel like it ought to be able to do that

00:07:18.800 however if it really works the odds of me trying it down to some point are pretty pretty good

00:07:24.800 but apparently you can slightly detect when somebody's not paying attention to you so let me ask you

00:07:32.880 this how happy would you be to spend time with a friend who has those glasses on and you don't really

00:07:40.320 know if they're watching a tv show while you're talking to them because apparently you can have all kinds

00:07:47.600 of content in the glasses uh i wouldn't like it at all i i don't think i would want to spend time

00:07:54.720 having a conversation with somebody who was wearing those glasses because i would just assume that

00:08:00.000 they're distracted you know even if i couldn't tell so i think that's the big question the big question

00:08:06.400 will be the social element to that all right so um you know how everybody's got a podcast these days

00:08:16.880 there's millions of podcasts and it's kind of hard to get attention you know for your your one podcast

00:08:23.200 and um so people do a lot of teasing uh for example i'm i'll be on the jesse lee pearson show on

00:08:33.280 friday so that's a tease but the best tease i ever saw for a podcast comes from pierce morgan so uh there

00:08:42.640 was a a post on x that said that journalist don lemon is showing a picture of him and they said he's

00:08:50.240 waiting for his interview with pierce morgan and then pierce uh reposts it the picture of don lemon

00:08:58.240 and him waiting for the interview uh and he and he just says four words these are the most clever

00:09:07.280 four words you'll ever use to tease somebody about your upcoming podcast and i quote it didn't go well

00:09:14.400 now how am i not going to watch that are you kidding me finding out that a don lemon interview

00:09:22.720 with pierce morgan didn't go well that's genius that is so good pierce you nailed it

00:09:32.000 there is a 100 chance i'm going to watch that because of what you said about it it didn't go well

00:09:38.320 that's just the best the best tea is well the fed cut the interest rate 25 points which really is

00:09:47.760 0.25 and they think there might be a few more cuts this year maybe another in 2026 and if you're

00:09:55.360 an economics nerd you might recognize that although inflation is not quite where we want it to be

00:10:02.080 it's 2.6 but uh wouldn't it be good to get it down to two however the job market is starting to soften

00:10:11.360 and you usually have those two competing things you know you don't want the interest rates high

00:10:17.200 if you're trying to make sure jobs are good but um if you jack up the interest rates too much

00:10:25.440 then you might cause some inflation because it might goose the economy and make it too hot

00:10:31.680 but the fed has decided to lean toward improving employment uh as opposed to perfectly optimizing

00:10:40.240 inflation is that the right choice well um i guess we'll always argue whether it could have been sooner

00:10:47.200 but it does seem it does seem like a responsible position in my opinion well we have to talk about

00:10:56.240 jimmy kimmel don't we how many of you were wondering what my take would be on jimmy kimmel

00:11:03.840 was there any point where you said all right i gotta i gotta see what this guy says

00:11:08.400 i guess adam carolla has not yet weighed in publicly um i will definitely watch that whatever whatever

00:11:15.120 adam has to say about it because you know they they have a history from the man show

00:11:21.200 and he is also a professional comedian type so what do you say all right i'm going to start

00:11:28.000 with the conclusion and then we'll talk about it right um i'm on jimmy kimmel's side

00:11:36.160 sorry i'm in his side now do would i like some revenge yes

00:11:45.120 yes i would enjoy that but that doesn't mean i get it that doesn't mean i should pursue it doesn't

00:11:50.640 mean the world's a better place if if it happens yeah i'd like a little schadenfreude because remember

00:11:56.880 i got cancelled i get cancelled for something i said very similar do i think i should have been

00:12:03.600 cancelled nope do i think roseanne should have been cancelled nope and i'm not going to change my mind

00:12:11.600 because it's jimmy kimmel did he say something offensive and incorrect yeah did it make the world

00:12:19.280 the worst place probably um but let's talk about all the things there are a lot of elements to this

00:12:28.000 but uh i would be very hypocritical if i were to be opposed to free speech all right so just as a review

00:12:37.600 um the the only speech that's not legal uh would be inciting violence and you know immediately

00:12:47.440 it's not even illegal to incite violence over time you know with some cumulative effect which is what the

00:12:54.560 democrats have done the cumulative effect of all the hill or hill or hitler stuff is that it incites

00:13:00.720 violence but the law does not recognize cumulative effect it only it's only what do you what did you

00:13:07.600 say just right now and did it cause somebody to do some violence right now now that would be illegal

00:13:13.680 and it's not because of the speech it's because you'd be inciting violence what's the violence that's

00:13:18.160 the illegal part the inciting it so that's your little uh little background there uh the the best

00:13:29.200 joke i've heard about it so far was from joel pollack who posted on x first they came for the bad

00:13:36.080 comedians i was laughing out loud at that this morning first they came for the bad comedians

00:13:43.840 anyway a lot of people are speculating because we're suspicious people we never believe anything in

00:13:50.720 the news is real a lot of people are saying that uh jimmy kimmel's bosses abc news i guess ultimately

00:13:58.560 um not abc news but uh um disney who owns abc who owns the show etc so some people are saying that uh

00:14:11.040 they probably wanted to cancel them anyway because the show probably loses a ton of money so you know

00:14:17.360 maybe it really was a business decision having nothing to do with anything except it was an opportunity

00:14:24.000 to get rid of a expensive asset maybe i don't know i i would guess that it's not unrelated meaning that

00:14:33.040 if you were making a billion dollars a year for abc do you think they would cancel now let me ask you

00:14:40.000 if he made a profit of one billion dollars per year for his corporate owners do you think they would

00:14:48.320 have said oh that's that's a bad thing you did we got to get rid of you i would say not a chance if he 0.85

00:14:55.760 was losing money every week and it looked like there was no chance i was going to reverse would they

00:15:02.800 possibly find a convenient reason to get rid of them maybe well it might not be enough yeah they might

00:15:13.920 all right so i wouldn't rule that out at all yeah that's certainly you know follow the money always

00:15:18.880 works so i wouldn't say it's the only reason but it's probably in there somewhere um let's see what

00:15:28.160 else we got here so he what he said was he he implied and i i guess some people said it was you know satire

00:15:36.960 or parody or parody or something but it didn't look like it to me it looked like he was uh

00:15:42.160 intentionally saying they believe that some maga person was responsible for killing uh

00:15:50.400 kirk and that's by the time he said it that was known with pretty high level of certainty that that

00:15:58.960 was not the case and the person who did it is almost certainly i put it at 95 98 percent

00:16:06.960 that it's a left learning leaning person who just hated uh hated the trump administration and charlie in

00:16:13.600 particular so here's the question how in the world is it legal for the trump administration

00:16:23.520 the government to put pressure on a private industry to maybe cancel somebody which would look like

00:16:32.320 a violation of free speech right now here's what would be a violation of free speech if the president

00:16:39.360 said abc if you don't fire this guy and shut him up um i will punish you in some specific way 0.78

00:16:48.960 that would be completely illegal everybody understands that right if the government tells you you can't

00:16:55.360 talk that's illegal that would not be allowing free speech but suppose as fcc chairman brendan carr explains

00:17:08.000 he was on hannity i think explaining this the fcc has a very specific job within the government and what

00:17:15.760 it does is that uh it's responsible for making sure that the public airwaves which are limited by nature

00:17:23.440 right there's not infinite um tv networks they're they're just you know the the uh there's not enough

00:17:31.120 room on the airwaves for much more than we have so because it's a public good the the major networks uh

00:17:41.600 abc nbc cbs they operate at the pleasure of the government now that's different from almost anything else

00:17:53.200 so if if uh fox news said something that the government didn't like the government has no

00:18:00.480 role with fox news because fox news is cable so cable is not using a limited public good which is the

00:18:10.560 airwaves because the airwaves are limited but abc nbc cbs if they if they violate what is the phrase the

00:18:19.760 public interest the public interest the public interest if they violate the public interest then

00:18:27.280 the fcc could act and that could include potentially removing their license

00:18:33.280 um so what do you what do you think the courts would say let's say that went to the supreme court

00:18:42.000 do you think they'd say that's not that has nothing to do with freedom of speech

00:18:45.680 the fcc's job is to say hey that thing you're doing is either in the public interest or it's not

00:18:54.800 so if you said that's not in the public interest would you be violating free speech

00:19:00.720 i feel like not i feel like that wouldn't be a violation of free speech but only if you're

00:19:08.320 talking about abc nbc cbs because the fcc specifically has the responsibility to make

00:19:15.680 sure they don't get down the line and what they're accused of is a pattern so it's not just this one

00:19:22.000 thing it's a pattern of misinformation political especially now is that a good enough reason

00:19:31.120 to pressure him to come off there although and let me say this if the government is pressuring somebody

00:19:38.880 even if it's not stated but it's obvious let's say the entity wants to do a big merger and i think

00:19:44.880 that's part of what's going on here um the the entities involved don't want to make the government

00:19:51.200 mad and the government's making it pretty clear that they don't like this uh jimmy kimmel situation

00:19:58.640 so does the government have to say directly if you keep him on we'll punish you you know that now

00:20:06.400 remember the absentee is a special case but just talking generally if a government said to somebody

00:20:11.840 uh you should quiet down or else uh we won't approve whatever it is you asked for next

00:20:19.440 but if they say it directly now that i got this from grok by the way you all know that i'm not a

00:20:25.440 lawyer right so anything i say that sounds like a legal opinion probably wrong so do your own research

00:20:34.800 on this one i'd say but i'll do my best right so if the government uh makes a direct threat if you

00:20:44.240 you know outside of the fcc that's a special case but if they made a direct threat shut up or we'll

00:20:50.480 do bad things for you that's totally illegal that would be absolutely a violation of free speech but

00:20:56.400 what if they don't make a direct threat but you just think they're the kind of people that would get

00:21:03.840 revenge i don't know because at some point it's just an opinion suppose the president said it's my

00:21:14.160 opinion that kimmel should be fired doesn't he have the right to just have an opinion if he said

00:21:22.800 you should fire him or i'll punish you totally illegal totally illegal but if he just said it's my 0.71

00:21:30.000 opinion they should get rid of him the country better be a better place is that illegal

00:21:37.520 it's sort of a weird gray area isn't it because especially with trump you kind of say to yourself

00:21:43.680 well i mean he's clearly not going to be friendly with him when they come to get some approval from

00:21:49.840 the government right would you expect the trump administration to be fully cooperative

00:21:57.280 with an entity that wasn't doing what they wanted in a fairly what they might consider an important

00:22:04.000 way i don't know that would be a i don't know if that kind of case has ever been tested

00:22:12.000 but uh some lawyer will tell me somebody will fill me in all right so the part i don't know is if

00:22:21.120 uh brendan carr the fcc chairman has a solid enough argument that in the special case that's the fcc doing

00:22:30.160 his job to make sure that the public interest is being met does this meet the standard of violating

00:22:37.120 the public interest well maybe not because some people would say uh he's a comedian and it is completely

00:22:47.440 legal to lie it is completely legal to lie in the service of a joke or just entertaining the public

00:22:55.440 you're allowed to lie unfortunately i mean it has to be that way because otherwise everybody would be in

00:23:01.120 jail if he made it illegal to lie there'd be nobody left so it has to be that way um

00:23:09.040 um so so so i don't know the answer to the fcc part if it turns out that that's completely ordinary

00:23:19.600 then i might alter my opinion but as a uh humorist slash cartoonist who has been cancelled for something

00:23:27.760 i said uh i'm not going to be in favor of it in fact uh my preference is that conservatives defend

00:23:37.680 kimmel on free speech um now we might encourage him you know because remember that this is private

00:23:45.280 companies private companies can fire anybody for whatever reason they want so the private company

00:23:50.960 is in you know completely clear territory it's just a business decision so can't can't go after them

00:23:59.360 but i think the world would be a little better and it would change the news cycle in a way that would

00:24:06.800 really flip the minds of the uh the democrats i think we should support him and just say nope we do not

00:24:15.200 want to go down the path of getting somebody fired now keep in mind i don't believe that fcc uh chair 0.74

00:24:24.480 brendan carr i don't believe he would be taking these moves unless he knew that at least the base

00:24:31.520 would be happy with it would you agree do you think the fcc would would put any pressure on on kimmel

00:24:41.200 unless the public felt the same way no no there's not really any chance of that because remember he's

00:24:50.880 operating quote in the public interest if the public had no interest i mean i'm using interest

00:24:58.160 differently here but if the public said we don't care he said that that doesn't bother us at all

00:25:04.880 if they had said that well then there'd be no reason for the fcc to be involved and i'd have a

00:25:10.000 problem with it but the fact that there are a lot of people almost entirely on the political right

00:25:16.960 who say yeah yeah that guy's got to be punished and it looks like there's a

00:25:21.200 there's sort of a you know special case here where maybe he could be or at least pressure could be

00:25:27.040 put on go ahead and do it because we like the revenge and we like the schadenfreude i like the

00:25:32.560 revenge about aside from roseanne there's nobody who likes this more than i do right there's nobody who

00:25:42.720 likes it more than i do but i asked grok if jimmy kimmel ever mocked me for getting canceled

00:25:49.920 because i didn't know a lot of people did and grok says no i i need a fact check on that is it true

00:25:59.360 that jimmy kimmel never mocked me for getting canceled a lot of people did you know public figures

00:26:06.400 but uh i'll ask separately maybe somebody can so grok says no says there's no evidence that he ever

00:26:13.600 mentioned me at all which counts because that was a national story and if he just wanted to pound on

00:26:21.200 some conservative types there i was i mean i was an easy i was an easy victim but if he said to

00:26:30.080 himself and i don't know this this would be purely mind-reading speculation if he said to himself you

00:26:36.720 know what i'm not going to go after a humorist i don't know if he did that but if that's the

00:26:43.520 reason he didn't mention it i would respect that and i'm going to return the favor i don't want to live

00:26:50.720 in a world where jokes are punished you'd have to be a really bad joke for me to do it so i know this is

00:26:59.600 very unpopular but if you want to be on the side of the angels i think we gotta give him a pass

00:27:08.800 i don't think it'll make a difference you know i i suspect that this is a you know decision they're

00:27:14.320 not going to reverse and i also don't think there's any chance that the majority of the political right

00:27:21.600 will say yeah give him a pass because i don't think people are thinking at it beyond the revenge

00:27:26.640 you know the revenge level and by the way like i say i'm totally in favor of revenge and um

00:27:34.480 mutually assured destruction so that there's a little balance and stuff totally in favor of that

00:27:39.840 i enjoy it it feels good but it's not the world i want to live in i don't want to live in that world

00:27:46.720 so even though um i believe i was treated unfairly in a similar situation

00:27:53.440 um i just can't live in that world so that's my take all right here's what um i mentioned this uh

00:28:04.960 when i was on tucker's uh show the other day there's something different about the lies that are being

00:28:12.560 told today compared to the old times and it used to be that if you said oh that reagan is hitler

00:28:19.280 people understood that as just hyperbole they didn't think oh he's actually hitler but when

00:28:27.280 you're doing it 24 hours a day hitler hitler hitler and every time you turn on cnn or msnbc

00:28:34.000 every time somebody's comparing them to hitlers or nazis you should assume that young people who are 0.91

00:28:41.040 exposed to that and it's all they know and they're not watching fox news or just watching those networks

00:28:46.960 of course some of them would reach the point of violence because they'd think well you know

00:28:54.000 everybody thinks they're hitler as far as i can tell so if i take care of hitler i'm fine so

00:29:01.920 the laws as they were written were about uh slander you can't do slander but you can lie

00:29:09.920 and you can you know exaggerate and insult and all those other things so if the cumulative effect

00:29:18.800 of wall-to-wall hitler accusations creates a situation where violence is guaranteed

00:29:25.600 is that inciting violence the answer is not legally no because it has to be immediate there's no such

00:29:32.320 thing as a cumulative you know over time a lot of people did a lot of things and the cumulative effect

00:29:39.760 was that somebody got killed charlie kirk in particular that's not illegal should it be

00:29:47.920 well it makes me wonder because when you know our free speech rules were created

00:29:54.560 this wasn't really an option there was no such thing as mass brainwashing that was coordinated through

00:30:00.640 the government and the in my opinion and uh the news networks so it's a it's a danger of free speech

00:30:10.320 that simply didn't exist at least at this level uh until fairly recently in history so there might

00:30:18.160 be something we need to rethink about that but in general i'm i'm gonna i'm gonna be biased toward

00:30:23.920 free speech if there's any gray areas this one's a gray area so i'm biased toward free speech

00:30:30.640 um let's see what else um

00:30:40.240 shoot

00:30:43.840 so what kibble actually said might be a little different from what people are imagining you know

00:30:51.920 uh he said uh he said the maggot people were trying hard to make it look like they were not

00:31:01.840 responsible for it but you can interpret that two ways one he's saying that maggot is responsible for

00:31:08.560 killing charlie kirk but would you take that seriously the other way you can interpret those exact words

00:31:16.960 words is that he's not saying maggot was responsible he's only saying that they're trying to make sure

00:31:23.040 you know they're not responsible that's not so bad so do you cancel somebody because they said something

00:31:31.120 that could be taken two ways you see this gets a little personal at this point something that can be interpreted

00:31:38.480 differently than it was intended is that how you get canceled that's what roseanne got canceled 1.00

00:31:44.640 roseanne got canceled not for what she thought or what she said you know that right it wasn't for what

00:31:50.880 she thought wasn't what she said it was what other people misinterpreted as her intention got canceled for that

00:32:00.480 i would argue that although i was intentionally trying to cause some trouble i was trying to do it for a

00:32:08.080 positive uh purpose including for black america but because people chose to interpret what i said a little

00:32:17.280 bit out of context because the larger context was you know dei etc um should i be canceled because someone

00:32:25.920 else interpreted what i said in a way that's not the way i intended it is that good enough reason to be

00:32:33.600 canceled i don't know but there's some chance and i wouldn't know because i'm not i can't read his mind

00:32:40.240 there's some chance that kimmel was trying to walk close to the line but he wasn't quite not quite

00:32:48.320 you know blaming maga for maybe doing it um looking at a comment it's the fact that he ignored the horror

00:32:57.200 and instead went political um that's just something you don't like that's not why you lose a job

00:33:07.600 i i get what you're saying that he wasn't showing the uh no actually i think he did at some point

00:33:14.400 i believe he did at some point um say the right words about the horror i think he did actually just

00:33:21.040 a different day um i saw that dave portnoy weighed in on this and he said it's not canceling its

00:33:29.680 consequences and that would be true if we're only looking at a business decision and or the fcc doing

00:33:37.360 its job for the public interest if you think that getting rid of him is a public interest

00:33:43.840 so but i do think that dave is you know sort of leaving out that the fcc is part of the government

00:33:52.800 and you don't ever want the government trying to directly or indirectly you know impinge on free

00:33:59.120 speech um but i understand what uh dave is saying so he's not wrong that it's primarily it's a consequence

00:34:07.280 situation more than a more than a free speech situation but if it's got a little bit of free speech in it 0.98

00:34:14.160 i'm still going to go with the free speech you know if you say well scott it's 90 he was a dick 0.91

00:34:20.880 okay if it's 10 free speech i'm going to still be biased for the free speech 0.82

00:34:26.240 um eric swalwell uh was defending kimmel um but of course the democrats feel they have to swear

00:34:39.280 and they're so bad at it listen to this swearing from eric swalwell so he's talking about kimmel 0.99

00:34:44.880 and sort of defending him for his free speech but he says it this way quote he's a fucking comedian 0.92

00:34:52.160 now eric let me give you a little advice swearing is is good if you use it right 0.98

00:35:04.560 like you know trump is just an expert at swearing in a way that people will laugh

00:35:09.600 when he swears doing a rally speech people laugh because he puts it in just the right place you

00:35:16.000 know you don't expect it etc and um he's also used it to make a really important point

00:35:23.200 so you know okay trump's not kidding about this one it's perfect use of cursing but swalwell's just 0.96

00:35:32.240 sort of randomly throwing it in a post he's a fucking comedian you know what would have worked 0.97

00:35:38.320 just as well he's a comedian do you think that adding the f word made his point better do you 0.99

00:35:48.160 think it made him look tougher did it make him look stronger did it make him look like a better

00:35:53.760 better politician didn't do any of that no that was just a mistake in communication and i it's like

00:36:01.120 i feel like they don't even understand the point that you can definitely get away with some swearing

00:36:08.160 if you're a little bit wise about when you do it this is not wise it's not even close to wise

00:36:17.200 so uh i responded to eric swalwell who said he's an effing comedian

00:36:22.400 by responding and i said so is roseanne and then i said do cartoonists count you know depending if you

00:36:29.680 call me a comedian or not um let me let me give you a little micro lesson now

00:36:38.160 something i've been meaning to discuss trump has a technique that i don't think i've ever talked

00:36:44.800 about and it's really really good it's really good and i've never seen anybody use it so this is one of

00:36:52.800 the most persuasive things he does and he does it sort of all the time it goes like this he always favors

00:37:02.560 strength over getting something necessarily done so for example um when he says uh i'm going to do this

00:37:12.960 with immigration and then maybe the court blocks him and let's say it blocks him totally he doesn't

00:37:18.960 win in an appeal that would be him acting strong but he got blocked what you remember about that

00:37:28.080 is the strength and then the next thing comes up and once again he takes the most i don't want to say

00:37:34.400 extreme because that's the wrong thing but the strongest that the firmest strongest take i will

00:37:41.040 send the national guard into your city to stop crime that's the strong take now suppose it never worked

00:37:49.120 suppose uh you know the courts or something else blocked him from doing it what you would remember

00:37:56.960 is how strong he was in trying to stop crime and i can give you a hundred more examples that he always

00:38:04.400 takes the strong point of view even if the odds of that succeeding are low because then you remember

00:38:12.480 the strength and the reason that that's so important is that whenever the new thing comes up whatever the

00:38:17.920 new thing is you're going to respect how hard he's going to go at it and that's going to modify how you

00:38:24.720 respond and probably in a way that's good for trump so um framing yourself as always the strong one

00:38:33.440 in the conversation the strong one in politics that really works that and if i were to advise somebody

00:38:42.640 say all right do you want to be right about everything do you want everything you try to do to work

00:38:49.840 or do you want to be seen as somebody who is stronger than a typical president now the risk is you

00:38:56.720 get called an authoritarian and all that which we see happening that's a risk

00:39:02.080 but uh i would say that the the supporters of trump are probably triggered more by the strength

00:39:09.440 because you want to know that the person who's got your back you know the one who who literally has

00:39:14.240 your back you want to think he's the strongest person so if you said to me who do you want protecting

00:39:21.040 you uh because this president he tried to do something with i don't know social security reform and it didn't work

00:39:31.200 it wouldn't bother me at all but if he told me he did he did strong things on the border strong

00:39:38.400 things in the city about crime you know he went after other countries that weren't paying their their

00:39:44.640 dues uh i'm going to see a lot of strength and that is really really good persuasion even when stuff

00:39:52.720 doesn't work out it's still the right play that's the part people don't know the ordinary person would say

00:39:58.240 i'm only going to try to do this if i've got a pretty good chance of succeeding he doesn't need

00:40:03.680 to do that he can try things that don't have a high chance of succeeding as long as it shows how

00:40:10.320 strong he is does that make sense i don't think this would work for most people but it's definitely

00:40:17.360 working for him all right uh according to the daily collar news foundation that impact is writing about

00:40:24.880 this uh i guess democrats are a little bit divided now over whether they should whether they should

00:40:31.840 keep using incendiary rhetoric and calling um the trump administration people uh nazis and hiller

00:40:41.600 uh but george takai you remember him sulu from the original star trek um he says that uh trump

00:40:49.760 employing the quote nazi playbook to exploit charlie kirk's assassination bright bars writing about that

00:40:56.560 paul boys and uh can you imagine being george takai and that that's the same week that charlie kirk is

00:41:07.200 assassinated probably because of people like george takai let me say it directly people like george takai

00:41:15.040 cumulatively not him specifically but cumulatively they caused the death of charlie kirk does anybody

00:41:22.320 even doubt that do you believe that there was any chance charlie kirk would have been assassinated

00:41:28.720 any chance if democrats didn't talk that way do you think they would have said i don't like his

00:41:35.040 policies and he would have been shot i don't i don't think there's any chance that i think they had

00:41:41.040 to not like the policies but also think everybody thinks he's sailor i think i you know this would be

00:41:46.720 popular i'll do this so it will be funny to watch them make the same mistake over and over but it's

00:41:56.720 not funny if it causes somebody else to take a shot um you know the news blaze media got a hold of i

00:42:05.360 guess they were first to look at it a report by a private entity who is the capital research center

00:42:13.280 and they did a study on george soros and his funding machine so it i guess it mapped out all the nodes

00:42:22.560 and you know where the money's coming and how much and stuff like that now that would be it's a 95

00:42:28.160 page report and apparently that's going to be turned over to the trump administration who also

00:42:35.600 said they wanted to do some research on the soros funding stuff

00:42:40.240 i guess also uh there's some talk about antifa being uh designated as a terrorist organization

00:42:50.240 that hasn't happened yet but uh remember i said trump is famous for taking the strong position

00:42:56.800 well what would be stronger than designated antifa as a terrorist organization now suppose it doesn't

00:43:04.960 work out like somehow he has to back up from that would it be a mistake nope it wouldn't be a mistake

00:43:12.480 even if he doesn't doesn't end up getting that done it wouldn't be a mistake because everybody would say

00:43:18.480 man that's strength he's going hard at at the people who need to to get a little pressure on him

00:43:27.200 well israel has completed the iron beam system um i don't think it's fully implemented in the idf but

00:43:34.240 technology wise it's passed its tests the iron beam is a laser that will shoot down drones now as you

00:43:42.800 know lasers don't work as well on cloudy or rainy days but israel would also still have the iron dome 0.76

00:43:49.360 which shoots up missiles to knock down other missiles but we are now we're now solidly in the domain of

00:43:59.840 uh lasers shooting down stuff uh scott uh you got canceled for telling the truth but kimmel was lying

00:44:16.800 yeah that's not really the important part that's not how analogies work analogies work when there's just

00:44:23.520 one thing that they have in common that this you know can tell a story and the one thing is that

00:44:31.280 if you're both comedians that's it lying is not against the law i don't like it i wish there would be

00:44:39.760 less of it but it's not against the law and so even if he does something i find very objectionable

00:44:47.360 well and he did uh it's not objectionable in the free speech sense unfortunately you know or maybe

00:44:55.360 fortunately um anyway this uh beam um

00:45:02.720 i understand uh somebody can give me a fact check if i'm wrong about this but my understanding is that

00:45:09.440 uh if the us is involved in maybe funding the development of weapons in israel that what israel

00:45:16.960 develops remember they're super high tech uh whatever they develop has some kind of licensing or

00:45:24.240 or the us has the ability to use it too so i don't know about that for sure that's that's just the

00:45:30.320 information i have right now but uh it's possible that israel just developed one of the best weapons

00:45:38.640 we'll ever have for defending the united states if that happened then that would be on the plus side

00:45:46.320 of arguing why funding israel makes sense if they happen to have a technical weapons development

00:45:53.840 industry that's in any way in any pockets is better than ours and we have a deal where if we funded it

00:46:01.760 we have access to some of that technology that might be a gigantic benefit for the united states

00:46:08.480 so if you're looking at all the pluses and minuses i'm generally not in favor of funding other

00:46:14.800 countries for anything i mean i'm just not in favor of it but uh you can't argue if that's true that we

00:46:22.080 would get that technology you can't argue that we don't get anything out of it

00:46:27.680 in uh uh what's her name um kamala harris she's got her new book out and she is she's saying in her book

00:46:37.600 that tim waltz was not her first choice for a running mate her first choice was pete buddha judge

00:46:43.920 because as she said quote he is a sincere public servant with the rare talent of being able to frame

00:46:50.320 liberal arguments in a way that makes it possible for conservatives to hear them

00:46:55.040 um is that what you think do you think pete buddha judge has that rare talent to frame arguments so

00:47:03.840 conservatives can hear them wrong that's not even a little bit true i've listened to a lot of pete

00:47:12.000 buddha judge do you think he frames things in a way that conservatives go you know

00:47:16.480 uh huh oh wow wow i had the opposite opinion but now that i heard pete uh buddha judge explain it with

00:47:26.080 his you know his golden tongue um i've changed my mind that was pretty good argument there pete no

00:47:34.160 i don't think you'll find anyone who says oh you know pete buddha judge changed my mind on that topic

00:47:43.920 i don't know kamala harris she's funny well trump's approval level doesn't look so good

00:47:52.000 but i'm not sure i care he's not going to run for office again um and it's kind of normal that the

00:47:59.840 more somebody gets is on the job as president he's going to do so many things that everyone is going

00:48:07.600 to find at least one thing that they're not crazy about so i don't know it just feels normal that no

00:48:14.240 matter who the president is at this point yeah they're probably going to be a dip um no surprise i

00:48:21.760 i'm not worried about that the hill is reporting that um according to a uh walton family foundation

00:48:32.560 gallup poll that just came out um only 35 percent of respondents are satisfied with the state of k

00:48:41.440 through 12 education in the united states 35 percent now that would probably be the 35

00:48:49.360 whose kids are in good schools don't you think um i have a question is is the problem with schools

00:48:58.960 excuse me is the problem with schools because they are a mess is it the teachers is it the lack of uh

00:49:08.320 let's say physical resources

00:49:10.160 students i feel like it's the other students what do you think i feel like um you know 65 percent of the

00:49:21.680 schools have just enough troublemakers that it ruins the whole experience for everybody

00:49:30.000 now i do think that in many cases that teachers are

00:49:33.440 bad but i don't think the teachers could help if the class has too many troublemakers in it

00:49:42.720 you know troublemakers

00:49:45.840 what do you think and it seems to me that private schools um solve for that because the only people

00:49:52.800 who go to private schools are the people whose parents think that's going to work and

00:49:57.680 uh it generally gets you a less troublemaking group of people and i i feel like the private

00:50:04.560 school would kick you out if you were a troublemaker whereas the the public school would have you know

00:50:10.480 more of an obligation to keep you even if you're a little bit of a troublemaker but what is the

00:50:15.600 problem is it mostly the other people the other students um imagine imagine if you will 0.95

00:50:24.480 i spend a lot of time imagining uh what it would be like to be a poor black student do you do that

00:50:32.880 maybe that's weird but i literally i spend a lot of time and always have wondering could you escape

00:50:40.720 that trap so let's say you're born into a poor single single parent situation and you go to school and

00:50:50.640 um 70 of the people in the class don't care about graduating don't care about their grades don't

00:50:57.520 care about their future and they're just causing trouble can you escape that can you use your you

00:51:06.000 know let's say you've got good character and you're smart enough you're smart enough that you should do

00:51:11.200 well in life is that going to be enough if if you don't have the resources or wherewithal to go to a

00:51:17.360 private school and you had to stay there could you possibly get a good outcome if 70 of the students

00:51:25.120 just came to cause trouble i would think there's not a chance not a chance at all so the first problem

00:51:36.400 with what you have to do to solve any problems you have to figure out what the actual base problem is

00:51:43.040 some of it has to be the teachers but it does seem to me that as long as the students beyond a

00:51:50.080 certain percentage of the class are troublemakers it wouldn't matter who your who your teacher is

00:51:55.280 there's no way you could overcome that so now it could be that in the old days let's say when i was a kid

00:52:04.960 capital punishment was still okay i had a teacher who would beat you with a baseball bat

00:52:11.440 if you got it in line like an actual baseball bat kept it you know kept it in the he actually kept

00:52:17.440 it in the class and uh he would have fist fights uh he was pretty strong he had this big monkey muscular

00:52:27.360 body and he would have fist fights with kids and i'll tell you we were pretty well behaved after a couple

00:52:36.240 of uh bouts of violence and in a small town back in those days if if you if a parent found out that

00:52:45.040 the teacher punched a child the first thing they would ask is what do you do that's the first question

00:52:52.320 what do you do and then he would tell them and they'd say uh all right well i don't love the fact

00:52:57.200 that you punched him but he had it coming you know some version of that and that unfortunately and i'm not

00:53:03.040 saying that's you know all good i mean you you can have some childhood ptsd from that um but generally

00:53:11.600 speaking forget about that one teacher he was extreme but generally speaking there was just more

00:53:18.320 discipline and it helped everybody in the class now i don't think we should necessarily go back to the

00:53:25.120 old ways but somehow you have to solve for the fact that not everybody in the room has the same goal

00:53:33.200 which is to learn you know you got to solve that before you have any chance with amex platinum access

00:53:41.280 to exclusive amex pre-sale tickets can score you a spot track side so being a fan for life turns into the

00:53:47.520 trip of a lifetime that's the powerful backing of amex pre-sale tickets for future events subject

00:53:52.880 to availability and vary by race terms and conditions apply learn more at amex.ca why annex all right

00:54:00.960 and then back to my original point if your only problem was that you were poor and you had a single

00:54:07.680 mother but once you went to school everything worked smoothly i think you could you could do great i

00:54:16.560 i think nothing would stop you under just those minimum conditions as long as school is good

00:54:23.200 you've got a way out that's the way it's supposed to work right it's supposed to be that you can work

00:54:27.600 your way out of poverty by working hard and going to school developing a skill tyson food said it's going to

00:54:35.120 halt the use of high fructose corn syrup which many people say is not healthy uh the hill is reporting on

00:54:43.280 this um and they also apparently they already on the roast they're going to halt the use of sucralose

00:54:51.680 that's a preservative i guess and they're they've already removed petroleum-based synthetic dyes

00:54:58.560 how many of you knew you were eating oil that petroleum based synthetic dyes were in your food you're actually

00:55:09.040 eating oil right or is it processed to the point where that's an unfair thing to say

00:55:18.720 um so i think what's going to happen uh is that rfk jr etc is creating a situation where all the big

00:55:27.840 companies are going to have to act and if everybody has to act then presumably there will be industries and

00:55:36.560 products that pop up to be alternatives to whatever the ingredients are that seem to be unhealthy

00:55:42.720 if only one company wanted to switch to a healthier alternative it might not be enough to make an

00:55:49.040 industry out of the alternative but if everybody kind of needs to because it'd be too much pressure

00:55:54.400 from the public and rfk jr then suddenly it's a big money situation to to get healthier and people might

00:56:03.680 produce that product for you so i feel like everything's working going in the right direction

00:56:09.440 on food it's just going to take a while

00:56:14.880 i saw a post by siki chen on x siki is uh in in the tech world he's well known in the tech world

00:56:26.080 he said i've lived in the united states for almost 42 years i've been alive and never had people be

00:56:31.040 openly racist to me until i heard from all the people either openly on x or privately in dms

00:56:37.920 hurling racist abuse at me for switching to the republican party and he says eye-opening

00:56:46.160 now that's shocking that is shocking all right um

00:56:53.440 so

00:56:59.760 so apparently the day before i saw this uh daniel greenfield wrote about this that uh the day

00:57:07.200 before charlie kirk was assassinated there was a free speech ranking in a fire survey fire being the

00:57:15.440 name of the company or the name of the entity fire a fire survey of 68 000 college students a whole bunch

00:57:21.680 of universities and revealed that one in three students believed uh believe that using violence to stop a speaker

00:57:28.960 they disagreed with on campus was acceptable one in three people thought violence was acceptable

00:57:38.560 to stop people from saying things you don't like violence one in three now here's my take i don't believe

00:57:47.680 that survey do you do you think that's true that sounds a lot like something that college students

00:57:56.480 say in answer to a survey it doesn't sound like something they do

00:58:03.200 so you know if you say to me uh do you think uh young people whose brains are not developed and they

00:58:10.800 like causing trouble and you know maybe they like using a little hyperbole i feel like it's something you

00:58:17.200 say on a survey if you're young

00:58:21.760 that isn't really something you believe or if or if you were in the situation you wouldn't do any violence

00:58:28.640 so i feel like

00:58:31.040 it's alarming and i would certainly keep an eye on it i wouldn't i wouldn't completely discount it

00:58:36.480 i could be wrong

00:58:38.880 it's happened but i'm not entirely sure that's telling us what we think

00:58:42.560 it's fake remember all data is fake um i told you that the us is going to overhaul the citizenship

00:58:50.880 test did you know that the citizenship was 100 questions but you only get 10 of them

00:58:58.320 so they randomly picked 10 of the questions but you would have to study all 100 to make sure you can get

00:59:06.720 most of them right so so used to be the only need to get a six out of ten

00:59:12.720 right uh but now you'll need 12 correct out of 20.

00:59:20.560 and i looked at the questions and i'm happy to say i think i could pass it

00:59:27.360 but if you had 128 facts that you had to learn and you only had to get 12 out of 20 right

00:59:35.760 how how long would you have to study before you could nail that you'd probably have to well not

00:59:41.440 probably you'd have to understand english otherwise you wouldn't be able to understand the test

00:59:47.280 and i guess it's a verbal test it's not even written somebody somebody just asks you 10 questions and then

00:59:53.280 checks it off but

00:59:56.480 i don't know what was there really some reason that we had to add 28 questions i don't know

01:00:02.880 know but there's probably a good reason for it um so according to just the news ben whedon already

01:00:13.600 2 million illegal uh residents have left the country 400 000 directly deported and then 1.6 million

01:00:23.680 self-deporting you know when i heard this whole self-deporting thing you know the commercials you

01:00:30.000 see on tv with christy gnome and she's saying you know if you leave now there's a chance we would let

01:00:36.080 you back in but if you don't leave and we have to get rid of you you'll never come back so some number

01:00:42.960 of people are self-deporting way more than i thought i i thought everybody would just hang tight

01:00:49.360 and try to ride it out you know try to hide from the law until there's a new new president or something

01:00:55.200 but that is if these numbers are right and you know there's always a question about that if really

01:01:02.480 1.6 million people left on their own on top of 400 000 deported wouldn't you call that a really good job

01:01:11.840 because remember the at least the 400 000 are not all but a lot of them are the worst i don't know what 0.64

01:01:20.240 percentage i don't think it's very high percentage actually but if they got a lot of the bad people first

01:01:27.280 i don't know that feels very successful i would give a i would give a high mark for that number of people in six months

01:01:35.200 um david sachs as you know he's in the administration he's got portfolio of crypto and i think ai and he

01:01:46.880 says that there's big news from china and that huawei their big tech company over there has introduced a

01:01:54.080 new ai chip that's going to compete with nvidia here we thought we were all awesome in the united states

01:02:01.120 because we had better chips so we could get better ai and you know rule the world but huawei is uh

01:02:08.240 competing now their chips are not as good as nvidia and people are saying things like well it's going to

01:02:15.680 be a long time before they can catch up we don't know that we don't know how long it'll take them to

01:02:22.080 catch up they've already figured out how to architect their lesser chips so that they act like better

01:02:29.280 chips they just use more of them and they can you know approximate nvidia they can't get there but

01:02:36.080 they can get close so china is not really desperate for our chips and they're doing essentially what

01:02:44.320 we're doing by trying to do better at mining rare earth so that we don't have to depend on them

01:02:50.720 well they're doing the same thing but what they're doing is building a chip building industry now

01:02:56.160 um the problem is that huawei will start selling its ai chips to other countries and if china is the

01:03:07.840 one providing the ai tech and not the united states then those countries are going to be a little bit

01:03:15.200 under the thumb of china because they will depend on china for their technology and they have to have ai 1.00

01:03:21.520 because everybody will have to have it so david sachs is warning us that maybe we should look at

01:03:29.600 loosening up our sales to the non-china companies so that they don't buy from china which seems

01:03:37.520 commonsensical i would i would say that on the surface that makes sense

01:03:41.360 um but i would also say that in general i feel like it's more likely that china will match nvidia

01:03:51.840 in a few short years than the chances that they won't um there's just too much too much riding on it

01:03:59.840 and they'll do everything from bribery to blackmail to outright ip theft and i don't know is it impossible

01:04:08.960 for them to just get one of the nvidia chips and look at the you know look at the architecture and copy

01:04:15.760 it is that not possible or is it the software well even that they could copy so i'm gonna i'm gonna bet

01:04:24.480 that china will surprise us in how quickly they reach parity if not more to nvidia

01:04:32.160 did you lock the front door check close the garage door yep installed window sensors smoke

01:04:40.800 sensors and hd cameras with night vision no and you set up credit card transaction alerts a secure vpn

01:04:46.320 for a private connection and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web uh i'm looking

01:04:51.920 into it stress less about security choose security solutions from telus for peace of mind at home

01:04:57.680 and online visit telus.com total security to learn more conditions apply well ukraine has attacked yet

01:05:06.480 another uh refinery in uh in russia this is a gas prom refinery in bashkatorstan russia so it's 1300

01:05:18.080 kilometers from the front line so they're going pretty deep into russia and they use scores of

01:05:23.440 drones and they had a direct hit on the facility now i don't know how much of it was destroyed or

01:05:28.000 whether it stopped operation but i was wondering remember i've told you that i was guessing that if

01:05:33.680 ukraine could take out 20 that was my own estimate of the refining capacity or the energy resources in

01:05:42.400 russia that russia that russia's economy would uh be in such trouble that they might want to

01:05:48.960 you know do a peace deal well according to uh whatever it was i was reading that i didn't write

01:05:57.520 down the source um they may have already just expert projections indicate that sustained disruptions to 40

01:06:05.840 or 50 of the capacity could tip the balance so i said 20 would put him in trouble the experts say 40 to 50

01:06:16.720 guess what they're at

01:06:20.080 so how much of that have they disrupted so far um if i wrote it down i think it was like 17 20

01:06:28.800 something like that yeah 17 to 24 so it's possible that there that ukraine is halfway

01:06:36.400 and there's nothing that would stop them from getting to 40 or 50 but they're already halfway

01:06:41.600 to the number that would collapse um the russian economy now it's i would say it's obvious that

01:06:48.800 that's the strategy because they don't really have any chance of winning you know a direct military

01:06:55.840 battle but they could definitely take out 40 to 50 percent of their refinery capacity and then things

01:07:05.040 things get pretty uh get pretty sketchy assuming any of those numbers are real

01:07:13.200 now obviously russia would up their uh up their response so you can't predict that that would give

01:07:20.000 ukraine any victory or anything but it might make russia sufficiently incentivized to at least talk peace we'll see

01:07:32.240 um california legislature i can't even believe this passed a bill to create subsidies for

01:07:41.120 news entities for media the media entities and uh it's because governor newsom thinks

01:07:48.960 that the media entities in california need a little boost now how do you interpret that uh this is

01:07:57.600 being reported by just the news how do you how do you understand that except for a way for the governor

01:08:04.640 to control the news uh if you want your subsidy you better do you know positive reporting about me

01:08:13.600 or do you think it's just another way um for the government to launder money do you think that

01:08:21.920 there's anybody who's like a good friend or relative perhaps of newsom who might be a recipient of some

01:08:28.960 of those subsidies well that's the way it usually goes on the democrat side if you hear they've created

01:08:34.800 any kind of funding or subsidies for anything the first thing you could know is that that money is

01:08:41.600 going to go to their cronies and people are going to give some of it back to the politicians who who

01:08:46.400 created that law so i would say every part of this looks dirty to me

01:08:53.280 well the pope has weighed in he's slamming elon musk for what he calls obscene greed

01:08:58.800 he said uh talk about money he said if that is the only thing that has any value anymore then we're

01:09:04.880 in big trouble he pointed out uh the continuous wider income gap he said uh yesterday there was

01:09:11.600 the news that uh elon musk is going to be the first trillionaire in the world and then he says what does

01:09:17.600 that mean and um so he thinks that's bad if the only thing that has any value anymore we're in trouble

01:09:24.320 blah blah um now i don't want to criticize the pope but i would point out that the pope's expertise

01:09:34.960 does not seem to extend to the business world let me explain what the trillion dollars is all about

01:09:42.080 the trillion dollars is not what he's going to spend on buying what better t-shirts

01:09:47.840 elon musk wears basically a t-shirt and jeans every single day like what was he spending his

01:09:55.520 trillion on is it because he he has a private jet that he flies around that would be a necessity

01:10:02.800 for anyone who has that many businesses if you have more than one business and you're a global

01:10:09.280 kind of a company and uh you need to run businesses in different places and you've got

01:10:15.600 yeah private plane is just business there's nothing wrong with that and it's not like he

01:10:21.760 even has a mansion or anything he doesn't have a mansion i don't know if he ever will he seems

01:10:26.560 uninterested in that kind of stuff so elon musk is the least consumer driven person i've ever seen

01:10:35.280 you know steve jobs you know arguably was in that domain but i think it's a complete misunderstanding

01:10:43.040 that the trillion dollars is just his money no it's not the trillion dollars is the value of spacex and

01:10:52.640 you know tesla and his other companies he's building robots and going to mars and you know solving all

01:10:58.800 these uh physical problems with uh um the the brain chip thing uh that trillion dollars is almost

01:11:09.680 i'd say 98 for the public good he only does companies that are for the public good he's not

01:11:19.920 making a video game although he might someday the the things he does are so obviously good for the

01:11:29.200 country if not the world at the very least it makes the u.s more competitive but it bothers me a little

01:11:38.160 that the pope would weigh in on this and be so wrong about understanding the general situation

01:11:44.960 i want elon musk to have two trillion dollars because his history is that he invests every

01:11:51.600 penny he makes now that that's how he got to where he is he invests it all so pope come on come on pope

01:12:01.520 all right i saw an estimate and tech explorer andrew zinn is writing that according to the wto ai might

01:12:13.120 boost global trade values by at least 40 percent so so that would be a gigantic you know improvement in

01:12:22.240 in business do you believe that do you believe that the wto can do a believable credible estimate

01:12:31.040 about how much ai will boost global trade let's see how well i've trained you do you believe that's 0.54

01:12:38.560 that's something they can estimate no this is as ridiculous as the climate models

01:12:46.000 no there's no such thing as estimating the temperature in 20 years that's not a thing i mean

01:12:52.240 not credibly doing it and it's not a thing that you can figure out how ai will boost global trade

01:12:59.280 please really really nobody knows what ai is going to do it might be better than that it might be worse

01:13:07.200 but nobody knows an estimate god all right nobody can legitimately estimate that sort of thing and

01:13:16.240 once you learn that it will help you a lot because there's a tendency if all these experts say well we

01:13:22.400 we estimated this thing we estimated this thing you say yourself well experts estimated a thing that

01:13:28.800 sounds pretty good to me um but generally when experts are estimating a thing the odds that they

01:13:35.600 know what they're doing and the estimate is credible very low it's very low all right that's all i got to

01:13:43.360 say today i've got my cat in my lap who has been enjoying the show more than you because the cat likes

01:13:52.000 it when i'm busy doing something else and he's just laying on my lap so gary i'm done now with the main

01:13:59.840 show and i'm going to go private with the uh beloved very beloved local subscribers and the rest of you

01:14:08.800 thanks for joining um and we'll be back tomorrow same time same place all right locals i'm coming at you in 30 seconds

01:14:21.360 30 seconds starting

01:14:29.840 it's

01:14:42.880 you

01:14:59.840 Thank you.

01:15:29.840 Thank you.

01:15:59.840 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 18, 2025

Episode 2962 CWSA 09⧸18⧸25

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript