Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 03, 2025


Episode 2977 CWSA 10⧸03⧸25


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 25 minutes

Words per Minute

143.01892

Word Count

12,166

Sentence Count

822

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

41


Summary

Scott Adams almost falls down the stairs, but survives. Plus, why lesbians have a higher divorce rate than other married couples, and why it's a mystery why they do so. And why the stock market is doing so well.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Come on in.
00:00:01.640 Getting ready for the show.
00:00:04.500 Luckily, I'm still live, but only barely.
00:00:09.140 I had a little excitement this morning.
00:00:14.440 So, I don't know if most of you know that I do a pre-show before I do this every day.
00:00:21.440 And the pre-show is just me feeding the cats.
00:00:24.180 And I take a few putts on my putting green and play some drums.
00:00:28.860 And basically, just get ready for the show while the chatters are talking to each other for the most part.
00:00:35.780 A lot of people think it's the best part of what I do.
00:00:39.240 But this morning, I had a little problem on my stairs.
00:00:46.360 And I fell down the stairs.
00:00:49.040 I'm not injured.
00:00:51.020 But my legs are weakened because I've had so much leg pain that I've been sitting and not walking.
00:00:57.400 So, one of my legs was so weak, my left leg, that the first time I went up the stairs this morning, I thought, hmm, it felt a little shaky.
00:01:10.340 So, you know, I always make sure I'm holding on the rails.
00:01:12.880 I'm at that age where you never walk up downstairs without holding the rails.
00:01:16.560 But I forgot something downstairs, my iPad.
00:01:21.960 So, I went back downstairs and turned around.
00:01:25.220 You want to see me on live video falling down my own stairs?
00:01:30.720 So, this is what the live stream audience saw just a few minutes ago.
00:01:35.600 I just had to get my iPad.
00:01:45.200 Here I come.
00:01:47.600 I was only about 10 feet up the stairs.
00:01:50.580 It doesn't hurt.
00:01:52.680 Oh!
00:01:52.980 Oh!
00:02:00.820 I'm flat on my back on the bottom floor right now.
00:02:04.400 All right.
00:02:05.600 You're seeing my reflection now, not the...
00:02:11.180 I survived.
00:02:12.860 Yes, I didn't fall down the stairs.
00:02:17.220 So, that was exciting.
00:02:19.880 How's the stock market doing?
00:02:23.520 A little bit up.
00:02:25.500 A little bit up.
00:02:26.860 All right.
00:02:27.380 We'll take it.
00:02:29.220 We'll take it.
00:02:30.140 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:02:37.680 Do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:02:38.880 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:02:39.400 Yes, I will get an Apple Watch in case I fall down again.
00:02:44.600 Do-do-do-do-do.
00:02:45.820 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:02:52.480 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never had a better time.
00:02:56.380 But, if you'd like to take a chance on elevating your experience through levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny, shiny human brains,
00:03:05.720 All you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or steinic emptying jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:03:13.360 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:03:15.100 I like coffee.
00:03:16.900 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:03:23.900 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and I will not be stopped.
00:03:27.840 Go.
00:03:28.120 Go.
00:03:28.180 Good stuff.
00:03:40.080 All right, we got some news.
00:03:42.100 You want some news today?
00:03:44.040 I'm going to put your comments up here so that I can more easily see them.
00:03:50.500 Come on.
00:03:51.840 Comments.
00:03:54.140 Do-do-do-do.
00:03:55.940 Get to the feed.
00:03:58.180 Come on, guys.
00:04:00.680 There we go.
00:04:03.140 Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-boom.
00:04:04.880 All right, we're all good to go now.
00:04:07.680 So, according to a Rasmussen poll, 84% of people are worried that online radicalization might drive more political violence.
00:04:20.320 84% are worried that online radicalization will drive more violence.
00:04:29.080 Where do people think it comes from?
00:04:31.860 If it doesn't come from online, what, do you think it came from your neighbor?
00:04:37.200 Did your neighbor get you all worked up to do some political violence?
00:04:40.460 What would it be except for online?
00:04:44.520 That's the only thing that gets us worked up about anything.
00:04:47.460 So, yeah, Rasmussen, I believe your poll is correct.
00:04:51.400 If not low, it should have been 100%.
00:04:54.500 Here's another one.
00:04:56.540 Let's see if you knew the answer to this one.
00:04:59.920 Eric Nolan in SciPost is writing about a new study that tries to determine why lesbian couples face a higher divorce risk.
00:05:10.620 Okay, now the funny part about this topic is that it's literally a famous comedy routine about why lesbians have more divorce.
00:05:25.000 But they looked into things like cohabitation length, prior children, and shared children, and they found out that those were not really very indicative, so they're not really predictive.
00:05:37.820 So, now their conclusion is that it's a mystery why lesbians have the highest divorce rate.
00:05:49.420 They couldn't figure out what the source problem was.
00:05:55.840 It's literally a comedy routine that everybody in the world understands.
00:05:59.820 If you put two women together, because women are usually the ones who initiate divorces, if you put the gender together that generally initiates the divorce, you get more divorces.
00:06:15.740 I think they could have just asked me.
00:06:18.300 I think they could have asked you, too.
00:06:21.000 Nope.
00:06:22.120 But whatever you do, don't say women are the problem.
00:06:25.760 All right, here's another one from a SciPost, Karina Petrova.
00:06:32.760 Again, probably could have saved a little money just by asking me.
00:06:37.440 But they found out, did a study to find out that your social status has a surprising, yeah, it's surprising, influence on your biological stress responses.
00:06:47.460 That the lower your perceived status, the more likely you'll be stressed out because you can't change anything.
00:06:55.880 Well, I can tell you that I had the experience of having no status, you know, as you do when you're a child.
00:07:05.600 And then I went to having no status as a young adult in my 20s and into my 30s, no real status at all.
00:07:16.320 But then Dilbert hit and I became a, you know, sort of a minor celebrity and I got some status.
00:07:22.740 I got to tell you that having success and, you know, associated status solves most of your stress.
00:07:31.280 I guarantee you that if you ever hit it big, you know, and you become either well-known and or rich or both, it will make you more relaxed.
00:07:46.400 You know, once you're famous, you can walk into any situation with no stress whatsoever because people come to you.
00:07:56.500 Let me give you just the cleanest example.
00:07:58.640 I get super stressed if I'm late for something.
00:08:04.700 You probably have that too, right?
00:08:06.600 Like if there's a meeting and, you know, people are already in the room, oh, that's the worst.
00:08:11.360 If they're already in the room and you're on the road, you know, you got caught up in traffic, that's really stressful.
00:08:18.020 So before I had status, if I were late, I would think, oh, God, people are going to hate me more, my status.
00:08:27.060 You know, I'll be, you know, creeping into the meeting late and, oh, God, and it would bother me.
00:08:33.740 Once I became famous, a weird thing happened that if I showed up late, the people who were already there would apologize for being early or some variation of that.
00:08:46.640 In other words, they would never get on me because they usually needed me to approve something or wanted to work with me or something.
00:08:53.040 So I would go from the thing that bothered me the most, being potentially late, to no problem at all.
00:09:02.280 It just disappears.
00:09:04.120 So, yes, the higher your status, it seems like it would be more work and more pressure.
00:09:10.300 In some ways it is.
00:09:11.380 But the benefits are just way, way better than the cost.
00:09:20.380 Did you lock the front door?
00:09:22.260 Check.
00:09:22.800 Close the garage door?
00:09:23.980 Yep.
00:09:24.460 Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?
00:09:27.920 No.
00:09:28.820 And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection, and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web?
00:09:34.560 Uh, I'm looking into it.
00:09:37.860 Stress less about security.
00:09:39.560 Choose security solutions from Telus for peace of mind at home and online.
00:09:43.720 Visit telus.com slash total security to learn more.
00:09:46.960 Conditions apply.
00:09:49.080 Well, according to Cell Press, AI was used to write nearly a quarter of corporate press releases in 2024.
00:09:56.660 Now, I have been involved with many, many press releases.
00:10:02.320 And let me tell you how press releases are written.
00:10:06.240 The, whoever's in charge of whatever entity is supposed to do the press release,
00:10:11.500 they look for the lowest, uh, the lowest, uh, ranked person in the office who can speak the language.
00:10:18.840 And then they say, write us up a, uh, press release and make sure that it's the most boring, you know,
00:10:27.260 looks like it came out of a form factory or something.
00:10:30.880 And, uh, whatever you do, don't make it interesting because that's the last thing you want to do.
00:10:35.260 So here's what I know that any of you who have been involved with a lot of press releases can confirm.
00:10:42.480 A press release always looked like AI wrote it.
00:10:46.740 It always looked like AI wrote it.
00:10:49.600 So to me, it seems like the most natural thing that you would replace with AI because it's not going to get worse.
00:10:55.600 I mean, press releases are just deadly boring.
00:10:59.740 And they're always, like I said, they're, the first draft is always written by the worst writer in the office.
00:11:06.120 I hate to say it.
00:11:07.660 First draft is always the worst writer.
00:11:09.980 And then it gets to the boss and the boss doesn't want to rewrite the whole thing.
00:11:14.240 So they just, you know, check the spelling or something.
00:11:17.280 And then it gets to me.
00:11:18.680 Let's say the press release is about me and I just don't give a fuck because I know nobody reads a press release.
00:11:25.340 So I have approved.
00:11:27.380 I can't tell you how many press releases about me that I've approved, you know, from publishers, et cetera, uh, that I didn't even read.
00:11:35.860 Because it doesn't matter.
00:11:37.820 Nobody else is going to read it either.
00:11:39.440 It's, it's the most unread document that will ever be created.
00:11:43.780 So yeah, a quarter of them going to AI makes sense to me.
00:11:47.160 Um, so open AI, uh, now has a Sora 2, uh, app that can generate realistic videos of, of people doing things.
00:12:02.520 And it's open AI and they decided to model the new ability by showing a realistic looking video of their CEO, Sam Altman, shoplifting at Target.
00:12:15.880 And it looks just like him and it sounds like him.
00:12:19.240 It looks like you shoplifting at Target.
00:12:21.660 And I'm thinking to myself, you know, I guess, I guess this app is so you can make content for stuff like meta and Instagram and TikTok and stuff.
00:12:31.600 It's sort of designed for what they call AI slop.
00:12:34.760 Have you heard that term yet?
00:12:37.220 AI slop, meaning that people are just generating all kinds of AI stuff.
00:12:42.320 And it's not all good.
00:12:44.140 You know, it's not all, it's not all sombrero stuff.
00:12:48.220 Uh, so they call it AI slop.
00:12:51.360 Anyway, so now we'll have video of every famous person shoplifting and committing crimes.
00:12:57.140 Step forward, step in the right direction.
00:13:00.120 And apparently Sora, Sora can't generate a continuous three minute video from a photo, like, but, uh, there's a app called long shot that can.
00:13:13.680 So I guess three minutes might be sort of the current record of how long a video you can make from, you know, a single prompt.
00:13:21.740 Um, but, and there's another one where you can splice together some shots of like a virtual room and you could splice it together.
00:13:31.280 So you, you walk through a bunch of virtual rooms, but it looks like it takes about six apps to make all that work.
00:13:37.580 So as far as I can tell, based on what I've seen so far, in order to make a movie using AI, you would need all of the skills of a movie maker.
00:13:50.340 So you'd have to know how to cast the right people, even though casting would be digital.
00:13:56.680 You'd have to still understand scripts and story and, you know, the, the nature of storytelling.
00:14:05.020 You'd have to be, um, you'd have to be basically a videographer so that you could say, oh, that's a, that's a good look and all that.
00:14:14.200 So I, you'd have to be an editor.
00:14:16.240 You'd have to be a director.
00:14:17.480 You'd have to still have to be a producer.
00:14:18.900 So it seems to me that the movie making business will probably no longer be the stupid people.
00:14:28.460 Don't you worry that movies were made by actors who just wanted a promotion?
00:14:33.560 So they sort of turned into directors, like you get kind of a promotion and that they weren't necessarily the smartest people you've ever met.
00:14:41.820 But it wasn't that hard because if you're a director, you have all these well-trained people who know how to do all the, the subtasks, right?
00:14:51.760 You don't have to be the videographer because you hired one, et cetera.
00:14:55.920 You don't have to be the lighting guy because you decided.
00:14:59.760 But now you would have to know a whole bunch about AI and how to use it.
00:15:05.980 You know, probably several different apps and they would be, they would be getting updated, those apps and they would, new ones would be coming online.
00:15:13.460 They were better.
00:15:14.020 You'd have to try them all the time and you would have to have all the movie skills.
00:15:19.440 But on top of that, in one person, because you couldn't really, it'd be hard to build something that you, that you delegated to other humans.
00:15:29.740 So you could delegate it to the AI, but you wouldn't want to delegate it to humans because then there'd be too many humans doing too many prompts with too many AIs.
00:15:39.040 It would be impossible.
00:15:40.680 So in order for somebody to make a proper movie, you would have to have the deepest talent stack that I can even imagine.
00:15:48.920 It would have to go all the way through AI, which is hard enough, but then it would have to include all of the movie making skill.
00:15:57.700 Who's going to be able to do that?
00:15:59.740 A few.
00:16:00.860 There will be a few people who can do that, but it wouldn't from, you know, you could randomly pick a hundred people and 80 of them could be a director.
00:16:11.100 But now if you had a hundred people, probably none of them, if it's only a hundred, probably not one person would have the skill to make a movie with AI, even a few years from now.
00:16:23.640 That's my guess.
00:16:24.640 Maybe one in a thousand.
00:16:25.720 Well, Meta is going to use your chat conversations with AI for ad targeting, but according to Reclaim the Net, Ken Makin is writing about that.
00:16:38.020 And I guess we all figure that, right?
00:16:41.760 If they can listen to you talking and send you ads based on what you're talking about in your kitchen, I'm not too surprised that they can give you an ad based on what you said on AI.
00:16:54.620 But do you think we're getting close to the point where the AI will directly give you an ad as an AI?
00:17:02.940 I need some suggestions where to eat.
00:17:04.800 And then the AI says, well, our sponsored restaurant is XYZ.
00:17:13.120 I'll bet that's where it's going, but they probably need to hold off on that until we're all hooked on AI to the point where we won't turn it off when it gives us a commercial.
00:17:22.640 We're not there yet.
00:17:25.080 This will sound like a little thing, but it might be a big thing.
00:17:28.180 And so that's from a post by Konstantinos Bousmalis.
00:17:34.980 He showed a video of a robot.
00:17:37.360 In this case, it was just a robot arm with a sense of vision, but it was an arm.
00:17:42.680 And it was teaching another arm how to do a task.
00:17:46.240 So the one arm knew how to put a lid on something or take something off a wall.
00:17:52.040 And then the other one just watched it.
00:17:54.340 And then it could learn it by watching it.
00:17:56.080 Now, if that doesn't seem like a big deal to you, you haven't been watching the robot space, it's the biggest of big deals.
00:18:04.620 If the robot can learn by observation, it's the biggest of big deals.
00:18:10.140 That's as big a deal as you can get.
00:18:12.820 That's just everything right there.
00:18:16.900 And it hasn't been able to do that.
00:18:19.860 So this might be the first indication that robots will work.
00:18:24.460 You know, they would have to learn by watching.
00:18:29.120 And I suppose if one of them learned by watching, then it can send a video to all the others and say, look what I learned by watching.
00:18:39.400 Perplexity, the AI company has now their Comet browser, it's called, is out.
00:18:44.080 And it works like an assistant.
00:18:47.080 So you can give it prompts and it will do a bunch of tasks.
00:18:51.120 Now, that's not the interesting part because there'll be a lot of those.
00:18:54.060 But the thing that was interesting to me is once AI becomes ubiquitous and every desk jockey has an AI and an AI assistant, which is coming,
00:19:05.460 I think it's a 100% chance that we'll all be talking to our AIs to get basic stuff done, right?
00:19:13.160 There's no question about that.
00:19:15.420 We'll all be using AI at our desk.
00:19:18.120 But what happens when people realize that the only really efficient way to do it is by voice?
00:19:25.600 Because you're going to get tired typing your super prompts all day long.
00:19:29.300 But if you could just talk to it, you will.
00:19:34.340 So does that mean that we'll have to work from home?
00:19:37.800 Because how in the world are we all going to be talking to our AIs in an open office?
00:19:43.460 Can't do it.
00:19:44.860 First of all, your AI would be listening to your cubicle mate and whoever walked in would trigger your AI and every other problem.
00:19:51.780 So I'm going to make a prediction that AI will drive remote work so that people can talk to their AI.
00:20:01.420 And then you're really going to hate it when your partner works at home.
00:20:04.740 Oh, man, you're going to hate that.
00:20:07.340 But at least it won't be at work.
00:20:09.580 There's a Gallup poll, Newsmax and others reporting,
00:20:13.640 that apparently the media approval is at a new all-time low.
00:20:19.640 So how many people do you – let's do a little test.
00:20:24.060 I like to test my audience for the new people.
00:20:27.060 You'll be amazed.
00:20:29.540 I'm going to see if you know before I tell you what percentage of people polled in the Gallup poll
00:20:36.540 think that the mainstream media is doing a good job.
00:20:43.280 What percentage think the mainstream media is doing a good job?
00:20:46.560 Oh, look at your guesses.
00:20:51.160 So accurate.
00:20:52.580 You're almost there, 28%.
00:20:54.340 Yep.
00:20:56.300 Most of you are betting 25 or 26.
00:21:00.120 But, yeah, 28%.
00:21:01.200 I'm going to give you full credit for your guesses.
00:21:04.240 Now, if you're new, are you wondering how everybody knew the right answer?
00:21:09.100 It's because we have jokingly but maybe accurately noted over the years
00:21:17.600 that something like a quarter of all people who answer polls have the dumbest possible answer,
00:21:25.120 the answer that no living, smart human should ever say.
00:21:29.380 Who in the world trusts the mainstream media?
00:21:32.100 How in the world can you say, oh, yeah, I've got a lot of trust for that mainstream media?
00:21:38.780 You would have to be paying no attention to anything.
00:21:42.400 And this is another one of those 25 percenters.
00:21:46.080 28 to be specific.
00:21:48.960 Well, did he – it's supposed to be his sentence today as it happened?
00:21:52.480 I mean, I'm in a different time zone, but did he get his sentence?
00:21:57.100 Could be as long as 10 years, prosecutors are asking,
00:22:00.500 because they dropped the worst charges, the RICO and stuff got dropped.
00:22:05.780 But defense is asking for time served, basically, one year.
00:22:12.140 That would be close to time served.
00:22:14.060 So he's either going to be released, time served,
00:22:17.760 or maybe he would get it up to 10 years.
00:22:20.520 So I guess he's teaching a business class to other inmates
00:22:26.020 so that he can get some, you know, sort of jail credibility.
00:22:30.620 So good for him, at least the teaching part.
00:22:35.400 How many of you know conservative online investigative reporter type Nick Sorter?
00:22:44.940 I quote him a lot, so he's a good follow.
00:22:47.800 Apparently he just got arrested in Portland.
00:22:50.520 He was attending, as a journalist attending,
00:22:55.400 to see what was happening at an Antifa event in Portland.
00:22:59.860 And I guess they set an American flag on fire and allegedly –
00:23:04.120 still fog of war, so we don't know exactly what happened.
00:23:07.460 But allegedly he may have tried to put it out.
00:23:11.580 Now, I don't know how you put out a burning American flag.
00:23:16.080 Stomp on it?
00:23:16.920 How exactly would you put it out?
00:23:19.840 If you threw water on it, I would think, well, that's, you know, respectful enough.
00:23:27.640 But if you had to stomp on it – I hope he didn't stomp on it.
00:23:31.460 Seems like that would be making it worse.
00:23:34.000 But we'll keep an eye on that.
00:23:35.980 I'm sure Nick will have an update whenever he's out.
00:23:39.320 He may be out already.
00:23:40.760 I don't know if he got really arrested or if they just – you know, I'm going to say –
00:23:46.700 well, I'll just say this so you've heard the alternative.
00:23:50.580 He might have been arrested because the police are assholes, right?
00:23:54.860 That's the first thing you think.
00:23:57.540 It's, oh, my God, the police are assholes if they arrested him for that.
00:24:01.060 But if they arrested him because that was the best way to get him out of the situation
00:24:06.120 because he might be, you know, beaten to death by Antifa,
00:24:09.740 then that was good police work.
00:24:11.760 So one possibility is that they were pretending to arrest him
00:24:15.500 just to get him out of the situation.
00:24:18.460 If that happened, good job.
00:24:21.340 Good job.
00:24:21.940 But we don't know that.
00:24:25.540 Andy Ngo is on Newsmax reminding us that he's well aware of Antifa trading events,
00:24:35.000 which apparently are happening all over the place,
00:24:37.120 and they're used to recruit and network and stuff.
00:24:39.620 So they have all these organized Antifa trading events,
00:24:43.500 and yet the Democrats say Antifa doesn't exist because it's –
00:24:48.620 you know, there's no leadership or organization.
00:24:50.660 Well, apparently it's self-organizing at the very least
00:24:54.260 because they can have all these trading events.
00:24:57.200 So if you're having trading events all over the nation, in fact, all over the world,
00:25:02.660 yeah, you're an organization.
00:25:05.260 And you could get RICO, in my opinion.
00:25:08.420 Well, Politico is writing – I didn't read the article, just the headline,
00:25:16.780 because the headline was good enough.
00:25:18.700 It said, half of America doesn't know who Hakeem Jeffries is,
00:25:22.700 but he's seizing on the shutdown fight to change that.
00:25:25.560 Now, as many of you know, the political competition between Democrats and Republicans
00:25:34.520 was at one time a fair fight.
00:25:37.880 Do you remember that?
00:25:39.060 It's like, wow, those Democrats are putting up a good fight.
00:25:42.800 They even won that one.
00:25:44.100 Ooh, they won that election.
00:25:45.920 Good fighting.
00:25:46.420 But now the Democrat Party is in full collapse,
00:25:51.900 and I can't think of anything that would be worse for the Democrat Party
00:25:55.880 than raising the profile of Hakeem Jeffries,
00:26:01.260 the most uncharismatic person besides Chuck Schumer.
00:26:05.600 The two of them are just famously uncharismatic.
00:26:09.500 Like, oh, my God, does the camera hate both of those motherfuckers.
00:26:14.400 You've heard, you know, the camera loves some people.
00:26:17.360 You know, some people just look good on camera.
00:26:19.500 And some people don't look good on camera.
00:26:23.040 It's more of a camera thing.
00:26:24.440 You know, they might look perfectly normal in person.
00:26:27.960 But both of these guys, Hakeem Jeffries and Schumer,
00:26:31.500 are terrible on camera.
00:26:33.860 I mean, just terrible.
00:26:36.020 And I wouldn't say that about everybody.
00:26:37.580 You know, AOC is great on camera.
00:26:41.800 You know, if you want the alternative, great on camera.
00:26:44.980 Momdami, he's great on camera.
00:26:48.060 But they've decided that in the shutdown,
00:26:50.240 they're going to put the two least likable Democrats forward.
00:26:56.200 Oh, my God, is Trump winning hard.
00:26:59.660 Every day that the Democrats are branding themselves
00:27:03.720 with Hakeem Jeffries and his sombrero,
00:27:06.160 and Schumer, every day that that goes on,
00:27:10.640 they get weaker.
00:27:11.800 Because nobody is looking at those two guys
00:27:14.700 and saying, ooh, lead me.
00:27:17.160 Lead me.
00:27:18.380 Nobody.
00:27:21.440 Anyway, so that's the next biggest mistake they're making.
00:27:25.460 So, apparently, the House Democrats decided,
00:27:28.960 as Jesse Waters was talking about this on Fox,
00:27:32.360 they decided that they would do this live stream,
00:27:35.740 that they would keep up for 24 hours.
00:27:38.780 It would be a 24-hour live stream
00:27:40.900 to just talk about the shutdown
00:27:42.960 so that nobody would, you know,
00:27:45.260 nobody would forget about it and they could get their message out.
00:27:47.640 And, apparently, at one point,
00:27:52.120 there were only 36 people watching them
00:27:54.440 and one of them was Fox News,
00:27:56.340 just to make fun of it.
00:27:59.080 And it only had 1,000 viewers at one point.
00:28:02.980 It was peaking live stream at 1,000 viewers.
00:28:05.740 And they decided to just take it down and give up.
00:28:09.200 They couldn't even pull off a podcast
00:28:12.360 because I saw the setup for the podcast
00:28:18.620 and it was just two guys you didn't want to look at
00:28:21.560 sitting awkwardly in chairs
00:28:23.720 with microphones in front of their faces.
00:28:26.080 They couldn't even get the basics right.
00:28:28.700 If you want somebody to look good on a podcast,
00:28:32.140 there are only two ways to do it.
00:28:36.560 Those people have to just look good.
00:28:39.320 That's one way.
00:28:40.260 Then it doesn't matter what they're doing.
00:28:41.580 They just look good.
00:28:42.840 The other way is you have to put them behind a desk
00:28:45.280 because at least it doesn't show their lower body
00:28:48.300 and at least it doesn't show their bad posture
00:28:50.340 and, you know, their little belly doesn't stick up
00:28:52.960 when they lean back in their chair.
00:28:56.040 But, no, they took two unappealing people
00:28:59.040 and put them in full-length chairs.
00:29:02.640 That's just not knowing how to do a podcast.
00:29:05.760 That's literally just not knowing how anything works.
00:29:09.140 Now, I did recently a podcast with Zuby
00:29:12.400 and the two of us had that same setup
00:29:16.040 with the separate chair that you could see the whole body.
00:29:20.040 And I'm looking at Zuby and I'm thinking,
00:29:21.820 damn it, if I look like him,
00:29:23.560 I'd feel pretty good in a full chair.
00:29:26.480 But at the moment, I'm not feeling too great
00:29:29.400 about my physicality.
00:29:31.500 So when I saw it played back, I thought,
00:29:33.400 you know, I'd look a lot better beyond a desk.
00:29:37.000 But Zuby looked great.
00:29:38.820 Zuby is great.
00:29:39.580 So 40 million registered Democrats,
00:29:44.500 but at one point they could get 36 of them
00:29:47.780 to watch that live stream.
00:29:50.180 They're just so not good at anything.
00:29:54.040 Well, Homeland Security, according to the Epoch Times,
00:29:56.920 removed five TSA officials
00:29:59.400 because they were involved in that Biden era thing
00:30:03.200 where they were putting people on the quiet skies.
00:30:05.640 We're going to follow you around if you try to fly.
00:30:08.840 Apparently that entire quiet skies thing
00:30:11.300 caught exactly zero bad guys.
00:30:14.160 All it did was take away freedom from,
00:30:17.740 and privacy from a whole bunch of Americans.
00:30:21.620 So do I think that those heads should be fired?
00:30:25.620 I do, I do.
00:30:27.360 Now they might've been just, you know,
00:30:28.660 following instructions,
00:30:31.420 but you really just can't have that in your government.
00:30:35.640 So I'm in favor of those firings.
00:30:39.520 All right.
00:30:44.280 So MSNBC is creating some fake news about P. Hegseth.
00:30:51.740 So they're doing the usual thing
00:30:53.900 where they take something out of context,
00:30:56.020 which is how, you know,
00:30:57.440 I think most Democrats were really worked up
00:31:00.260 about the risk and the badness of Republicans
00:31:04.500 almost entirely get their news out of context.
00:31:09.080 Have you noticed that?
00:31:10.580 If you could fix that one thing,
00:31:13.740 that there would be no out of context news,
00:31:16.880 it would change everything.
00:31:18.860 But, you know, the TV news especially,
00:31:21.360 they could just say stuff
00:31:22.560 and then not put it on anybody else who doubts it.
00:31:26.680 And that's the news.
00:31:28.280 So here's an example.
00:31:29.800 Do you remember when P. Hegseth was saying
00:31:31.760 that, you know,
00:31:33.860 he valued women in the military,
00:31:36.360 but they would have to meet
00:31:37.660 the same physical standards as men
00:31:39.820 if they were going to be in combat roles?
00:31:43.320 Does that say anything?
00:31:47.300 It doesn't say anything.
00:31:49.020 It's saying that if you're going to be
00:31:50.240 in a combat role,
00:31:51.280 you're going to have to meet a certain standard,
00:31:52.800 and we don't care what your genitalia is.
00:31:56.120 How do you get more fair than that?
00:31:58.000 Same standard, men and women.
00:32:00.920 What did MSNBC turn that into?
00:32:04.700 Their words is that he's ruling out
00:32:07.860 women in combat roles.
00:32:10.500 Well, in effect,
00:32:12.560 it would presumably reduce
00:32:14.500 the number of women in combat roles
00:32:16.400 if they had a higher standard
00:32:18.040 than they've had before.
00:32:19.700 But it doesn't eliminate them.
00:32:21.360 It says if you can do the work,
00:32:23.180 you got the job.
00:32:25.260 That's all it says.
00:32:26.300 If you can do the work,
00:32:27.900 you're in.
00:32:29.180 So, but they turned that into something
00:32:31.540 it isn't by removing the context.
00:32:36.140 Well, you may have seen it already,
00:32:38.200 but after three days of winning the meme war,
00:32:43.740 Trump with his memes of Hakeem Jeffries
00:32:47.320 with his sombrero,
00:32:48.920 it's just the funniest thing.
00:32:51.960 Even,
00:32:52.700 what's the show,
00:32:54.260 The Daily Show?
00:32:56.280 You know,
00:32:56.680 when Jon Stewart's not
00:32:58.360 The Daily Show host,
00:32:59.640 I think he does one day a week.
00:33:01.400 But,
00:33:01.700 who is the Asian American guy
00:33:03.920 who is The Daily Show host?
00:33:05.880 He's pretty funny.
00:33:07.060 But,
00:33:07.580 he completely took
00:33:09.800 the memes aside.
00:33:12.640 He just couldn't get over
00:33:15.880 how funny the meme was,
00:33:17.280 even though he didn't understand
00:33:18.480 the relevance.
00:33:19.680 Like,
00:33:19.960 why does Hakeem Jeffries have a,
00:33:22.420 he didn't even know
00:33:23.580 why Hakeem Jeffries
00:33:24.760 was being put in a sombrero
00:33:26.380 and a Mexican mustache.
00:33:28.380 The reason is that,
00:33:30.100 allegedly,
00:33:31.060 he wants to give
00:33:31.860 budget money
00:33:33.420 to undocumented
00:33:34.860 people.
00:33:35.640 But,
00:33:38.440 you'd have to know
00:33:39.100 that story.
00:33:40.120 But still,
00:33:40.680 The Daily Show guy
00:33:41.880 said he didn't even know
00:33:42.780 what it had to do with,
00:33:44.260 but he couldn't stop laughing
00:33:45.900 because it was hilarious.
00:33:47.460 Because it's hilarious.
00:33:49.060 And then,
00:33:49.440 and then he showed
00:33:50.120 the third one
00:33:51.160 in the series
00:33:51.880 where Trump himself
00:33:53.560 is wearing a sombrero
00:33:54.800 and playing in the
00:33:55.820 mariachi band.
00:33:56.920 And then he's all confused.
00:33:58.800 Because,
00:33:59.180 is it good or bad
00:34:00.080 to be a mariachi guy
00:34:01.700 with a Mexican hat?
00:34:03.000 Wait a minute.
00:34:03.400 If it's bad,
00:34:04.380 why'd they put Trump
00:34:05.180 in a hat?
00:34:07.020 Just perfect.
00:34:08.380 Just perfect.
00:34:09.560 But this morning
00:34:10.300 I wake up to a new one
00:34:11.620 that's the music
00:34:13.440 of Blue Oyster Cult.
00:34:15.320 Here comes the Reaper
00:34:16.360 with a AI-generated meme
00:34:20.180 that shows Russ vote
00:34:22.040 and Trump looking like Reapers
00:34:25.080 and that they're going to come
00:34:26.580 after your,
00:34:27.360 after your Democrat employees
00:34:31.320 and fire them.
00:34:32.420 Because I guess he can do
00:34:33.340 a bunch of firing
00:34:34.180 during the government
00:34:35.320 close down.
00:34:36.780 And he's going to shut
00:34:37.440 a bunch of Democrat entities
00:34:39.740 and Democrat functions
00:34:41.080 and fire a bunch of Democrats.
00:34:43.200 So instead of being coy about it,
00:34:46.460 instead of trying
00:34:48.540 to lower the temperature,
00:34:50.400 you know,
00:34:50.560 what a normal president would do
00:34:52.420 would be like,
00:34:53.340 oh yeah,
00:34:53.800 there might be a few layoffs.
00:34:57.420 Yeah.
00:34:57.720 We might be,
00:34:58.780 you know,
00:34:58.960 use that time
00:34:59.660 to look at a few things
00:35:00.660 we can adjust
00:35:01.380 and try to minimize it.
00:35:03.400 No.
00:35:03.820 Instead of trying to minimize it,
00:35:06.300 Trump goes right at it
00:35:08.200 with a meme of him
00:35:10.200 as the Reaper
00:35:11.900 getting rid of all these Democrats.
00:35:14.080 Oh no.
00:35:17.920 And then Trump said separately,
00:35:19.740 I can't believe
00:35:20.340 the radical left Democrats
00:35:21.740 gave me this unprecedented opportunity.
00:35:24.740 They're not stupid people.
00:35:25.980 So maybe this is their way
00:35:27.580 of wanting to quietly
00:35:28.720 and quickly
00:35:29.320 make America great again.
00:35:32.140 So now he's speculating
00:35:33.900 that Democrats
00:35:35.120 are pretending
00:35:36.000 to be incompetent
00:35:37.320 so they can get
00:35:38.440 some stuff done
00:35:39.320 without stopping Trump
00:35:41.260 from doing it.
00:35:43.440 Now,
00:35:44.040 I don't think
00:35:44.500 that's exactly
00:35:45.180 what's happening,
00:35:45.960 but God,
00:35:46.460 that's funny.
00:35:47.600 That is so funny.
00:35:49.080 The fact that he's
00:35:50.420 trolling them
00:35:52.260 and beating them
00:35:53.300 at the same time,
00:35:54.940 I could not enjoy this more.
00:35:57.720 And the fact that Trump
00:35:58.760 knows he's entertaining
00:35:59.840 his base
00:36:00.460 while driving crazy
00:36:02.060 his competition,
00:36:04.360 it just doesn't get
00:36:05.640 any better than this.
00:36:07.060 How are we ever
00:36:07.960 going to enjoy
00:36:08.840 another president?
00:36:09.880 This is the most fun
00:36:11.880 any president's ever been.
00:36:14.560 Nobody's ever
00:36:15.160 going to match this.
00:36:16.140 I mean,
00:36:16.360 I have a lot of confidence
00:36:17.440 in J.D. Vance.
00:36:19.020 If he makes it in,
00:36:20.200 I think he'll be terrific.
00:36:21.920 But, man,
00:36:22.820 you'll never match this.
00:36:24.240 You will never match this.
00:36:25.680 This is a form of genius
00:36:28.600 what Trump is executing
00:36:31.320 right now.
00:36:31.860 It's a form of genius
00:36:32.880 like I don't think
00:36:33.940 we'll ever see again
00:36:35.020 because he has
00:36:36.320 that talent stack
00:36:37.400 that, you know,
00:36:38.680 goes across entertainment,
00:36:41.180 you know,
00:36:41.600 decades of experience.
00:36:43.760 He just has exactly
00:36:44.780 the right stack
00:36:46.460 of talents to do this.
00:36:47.740 Nobody else does.
00:36:48.980 Only him.
00:36:52.580 So,
00:36:53.240 Akeem put it
00:36:53.840 in the post
00:36:54.780 and actually says,
00:36:55.880 we are ready
00:36:56.360 to debate
00:36:56.920 the government funding
00:36:57.980 and the Republican
00:36:58.780 health care crisis
00:37:00.000 anytime,
00:37:01.280 anyplace,
00:37:02.300 with the cameras rolling.
00:37:03.540 He says,
00:37:05.420 Trump,
00:37:06.320 Vice President,
00:37:07.660 Speaker Johnson,
00:37:09.080 what say you?
00:37:10.540 And I looked
00:37:11.080 in the comments
00:37:11.900 to his,
00:37:13.000 to his aggressive challenge
00:37:16.380 to debate it
00:37:17.840 on the camera
00:37:19.080 and Michael Malice
00:37:20.760 had a comment
00:37:21.520 right below it
00:37:22.980 in all caps.
00:37:24.580 He says,
00:37:25.220 go back to Mexico.
00:37:26.240 Now,
00:37:26.560 if you don't know
00:37:31.300 who Michael Malice is,
00:37:32.740 it's not as funny.
00:37:34.280 You have to know
00:37:35.220 he's just one
00:37:35.780 of the funniest people
00:37:36.560 in the world.
00:37:37.840 But,
00:37:38.340 that we so
00:37:43.360 don't take him seriously
00:37:44.660 that nobody even cares
00:37:46.200 that he wants
00:37:46.700 to debate it on camera.
00:37:48.040 We're not even interested.
00:37:49.520 We just go back
00:37:50.140 to Mexico
00:37:50.760 where,
00:37:52.520 if you didn't know,
00:37:53.300 he's not from Mexico.
00:37:54.420 but he has been seen
00:37:56.220 in the sombrero lately.
00:37:57.980 Go back to Mexico.
00:38:01.260 It'd be even funnier
00:38:02.560 if Trump agreed
00:38:04.440 to debate
00:38:05.120 but only with AOC
00:38:06.280 because she's not even
00:38:08.320 in the chain of command
00:38:09.800 for this topic.
00:38:11.860 Oh yeah,
00:38:12.280 I'll do it
00:38:12.680 but only with AOC.
00:38:15.960 Anyway,
00:38:17.000 the smart people
00:38:19.920 are pretty sure
00:38:21.220 that the only way
00:38:22.380 this shutdown ends
00:38:24.360 is with Democrats
00:38:25.620 giving up.
00:38:27.120 Do you think that too?
00:38:29.080 Do you think
00:38:29.600 the only way
00:38:30.380 this ends
00:38:30.880 is with Democrats
00:38:31.740 saying,
00:38:32.160 all right,
00:38:33.100 all right,
00:38:33.800 all right,
00:38:34.540 you know,
00:38:34.840 we only have to wait
00:38:35.740 seven weeks
00:38:36.500 and then we're back
00:38:37.840 in negotiating
00:38:38.560 the budget
00:38:39.180 so we could just
00:38:40.160 wait seven weeks.
00:38:42.720 I don't see it
00:38:43.760 ending any other way,
00:38:45.220 do you?
00:38:46.220 As far as I can tell,
00:38:48.180 Trump is perfectly happy
00:38:49.860 torturing them
00:38:50.740 with funny memes
00:38:52.140 keeping them
00:38:53.480 off the job
00:38:54.540 and cutting
00:38:56.440 all this fat
00:38:57.980 that he wanted
00:38:58.500 to cut anyway.
00:39:00.100 So,
00:39:00.840 it definitely looks
00:39:01.900 like all the cards
00:39:03.040 are in Trump's favor
00:39:05.080 right now.
00:39:06.000 It looks like it.
00:39:07.080 So,
00:39:07.500 I can't imagine
00:39:08.260 it would go
00:39:08.860 any direction
00:39:09.580 other than
00:39:10.120 yet another failure
00:39:11.180 but during that time
00:39:13.360 that they fail,
00:39:14.760 they get to highlight
00:39:15.740 their two leaders,
00:39:17.020 Hakeem Jeffries
00:39:18.360 and Chuck Schumer.
00:39:20.760 That is all bad
00:39:22.220 every day.
00:39:23.580 Every second
00:39:24.600 that they're on TV,
00:39:26.480 every second
00:39:27.340 makes the Democrats
00:39:28.400 less popular
00:39:29.300 because even the Democrats
00:39:30.580 are not looking
00:39:31.700 at those two guys
00:39:32.860 and saying,
00:39:33.720 hmm,
00:39:34.640 hmm,
00:39:35.600 there's my leaders
00:39:36.480 right there.
00:39:38.520 So,
00:39:39.020 I mean,
00:39:39.380 I think if it were AOC,
00:39:42.320 things might be going
00:39:43.240 in the right direction
00:39:44.060 because they might say,
00:39:45.720 all right,
00:39:46.140 all right,
00:39:46.540 I'll follow her
00:39:47.260 but they don't.
00:39:51.580 Newt Gingrich
00:39:52.420 had a good summary of it.
00:39:54.040 He says the Democrats
00:39:55.020 just pulled off
00:39:55.880 what he calls
00:39:56.360 a double negative.
00:39:58.260 He was talking
00:39:58.820 to Jesse Waters
00:39:59.660 about this.
00:40:00.620 So,
00:40:00.780 the double negative
00:40:01.500 is that there are
00:40:02.360 two things
00:40:03.020 that the American people
00:40:04.220 want.
00:40:06.360 Just two things.
00:40:07.700 Well,
00:40:08.000 they want more than that
00:40:08.900 but two things
00:40:09.560 the American people
00:40:10.280 want on this topic.
00:40:12.280 Number one,
00:40:13.240 do not close
00:40:14.020 the government.
00:40:15.360 Number two,
00:40:15.960 do not raise spending
00:40:17.420 and then Newt
00:40:18.820 points out.
00:40:19.580 So,
00:40:20.060 what do the Democrats
00:40:20.940 do?
00:40:21.440 They say,
00:40:21.940 I'm going to close
00:40:22.580 the government
00:40:23.000 until you raise
00:40:23.760 spending.
00:40:24.780 That's a double
00:40:25.640 negative
00:40:26.120 to which I say,
00:40:29.340 no,
00:40:29.520 you're wrong.
00:40:30.100 You're wrong,
00:40:30.620 Newt.
00:40:31.060 It's not a double
00:40:31.840 negative
00:40:32.320 because they're
00:40:34.120 doing it
00:40:34.580 by putting forward
00:40:35.680 Schumer
00:40:36.400 and Jeffries.
00:40:37.100 It's a triple
00:40:38.220 negative.
00:40:39.240 It's a triple.
00:40:40.660 You cannot
00:40:42.640 discount
00:40:43.360 that they're
00:40:43.880 putting their
00:40:44.360 least charismatic,
00:40:46.460 least likable
00:40:47.720 two people
00:40:48.380 as the face
00:40:49.800 of this problem.
00:40:51.080 Yeah,
00:40:51.340 that's three things
00:40:52.120 we don't want
00:40:52.660 to do.
00:40:53.000 We don't want
00:40:53.380 to close
00:40:53.760 the government.
00:40:54.380 We don't want
00:40:54.760 to raise spending
00:40:55.400 and we don't want
00:40:56.440 to spend one more
00:40:57.280 freaking second
00:40:57.980 looking at
00:40:58.640 Hakeem Jeffries
00:40:59.460 or Schumer
00:41:00.080 on camera.
00:41:01.280 Can you give us
00:41:02.220 somebody
00:41:02.860 who's got
00:41:04.300 a little bit
00:41:04.980 of charisma?
00:41:05.960 Just a little bit.
00:41:07.460 Something interesting.
00:41:08.600 I'll watch.
00:41:09.660 Like I said,
00:41:10.440 I'll watch AOC.
00:41:12.460 Yeah.
00:41:13.660 It's not about
00:41:14.520 being a Democrat.
00:41:15.540 It's about being,
00:41:16.700 have a little bit
00:41:17.620 of charisma.
00:41:18.320 Please.
00:41:21.180 Well,
00:41:21.620 Kash Patel
00:41:22.360 was asked
00:41:23.060 a question
00:41:23.520 about whether
00:41:24.000 he thought
00:41:24.480 Nancy Pelosi
00:41:25.440 was behind
00:41:26.660 planning
00:41:27.300 the January 6th
00:41:29.160 event to turn
00:41:30.040 it into
00:41:30.480 an insurrection
00:41:32.500 narrative.
00:41:33.640 Now,
00:41:34.000 I will tell
00:41:34.520 you that
00:41:35.080 I am not
00:41:35.920 persuaded
00:41:36.700 by the new
00:41:38.200 news that
00:41:38.840 there were
00:41:39.120 lots of
00:41:39.680 FBI people
00:41:40.600 in the crowd.
00:41:42.460 I understand
00:41:43.540 what that means,
00:41:44.800 that it means
00:41:45.400 they could have
00:41:46.460 been ordered
00:41:47.900 to cause trouble.
00:41:49.980 Definitely
00:41:50.500 could have
00:41:51.280 and certainly
00:41:52.480 it looks like
00:41:53.340 the FBI
00:41:54.680 in prior
00:41:56.280 leadership,
00:41:57.080 it looks like
00:41:57.600 they were lying
00:41:58.260 to us
00:41:58.780 about the
00:42:00.640 involvement.
00:42:01.120 but it
00:42:02.340 doesn't
00:42:02.940 necessarily
00:42:03.700 mean
00:42:04.320 that we
00:42:05.420 have a
00:42:05.880 direct
00:42:06.280 smoking gun
00:42:07.280 that they
00:42:08.420 cause the
00:42:09.080 trouble.
00:42:09.640 Because there
00:42:10.220 are some
00:42:10.480 people that
00:42:11.060 look like
00:42:11.840 they might
00:42:12.220 have been
00:42:12.520 operatives,
00:42:13.860 breaking
00:42:14.380 windows and
00:42:15.280 stuff like
00:42:16.220 that,
00:42:16.540 but we
00:42:16.780 don't know.
00:42:17.760 I mean,
00:42:17.980 they could
00:42:18.260 have been
00:42:18.620 some other
00:42:19.860 kind of
00:42:20.220 operative,
00:42:20.720 not FBI.
00:42:22.040 So I'm
00:42:22.780 personally
00:42:23.380 not totally
00:42:24.780 persuaded,
00:42:25.880 but I'm
00:42:26.240 open to it.
00:42:27.620 Definitely
00:42:27.940 open to it
00:42:29.080 because it
00:42:29.720 certainly
00:42:30.100 opens up
00:42:30.700 the extreme
00:42:31.940 possibility
00:42:32.720 that they
00:42:33.920 were involved,
00:42:34.640 but don't
00:42:36.040 have that
00:42:36.640 last whistleblower
00:42:38.880 thing.
00:42:40.200 By now,
00:42:41.340 we would have
00:42:42.660 at least one
00:42:43.300 whistleblower
00:42:43.920 that says,
00:42:44.500 here's the
00:42:44.880 deal,
00:42:45.500 I was
00:42:45.940 directly
00:42:46.520 told to
00:42:47.800 go turn
00:42:48.300 this into
00:42:48.740 a riot.
00:42:50.180 Short of
00:42:50.840 that,
00:42:52.280 and I
00:42:52.640 think we
00:42:53.000 would have
00:42:53.300 seen that
00:42:53.740 by now,
00:42:54.700 short of
00:42:55.300 that,
00:42:56.140 I'm going
00:42:57.460 to just
00:42:58.380 say fog
00:42:59.580 of war
00:42:59.920 still,
00:43:00.980 and could
00:43:01.780 go either
00:43:02.140 way.
00:43:03.120 But,
00:43:03.660 as Kash Patel
00:43:04.600 reminds us,
00:43:06.000 remember when
00:43:07.080 there was a
00:43:08.120 claim that
00:43:08.760 the National
00:43:09.280 Guard had
00:43:10.120 been offered
00:43:11.000 but declined,
00:43:13.060 and apparently
00:43:13.520 Pelosi at the
00:43:14.460 time said
00:43:14.980 that was a
00:43:15.480 lie.
00:43:16.600 I think
00:43:17.560 she was
00:43:17.960 claiming,
00:43:18.900 if I have
00:43:19.600 this story
00:43:20.020 right,
00:43:20.340 I believe
00:43:20.660 I do,
00:43:21.620 she was
00:43:22.200 claiming that
00:43:22.820 that never
00:43:23.300 happened,
00:43:23.760 there was
00:43:23.980 no declining
00:43:24.880 of the
00:43:26.360 help.
00:43:27.280 Well,
00:43:28.440 later,
00:43:28.880 after Kash Patel
00:43:29.800 is in
00:43:30.040 there,
00:43:30.240 they find
00:43:30.600 the documents
00:43:31.360 that were
00:43:32.200 indeed the
00:43:32.800 declination
00:43:33.440 of the
00:43:34.040 help.
00:43:34.940 So,
00:43:35.200 now that's
00:43:35.560 a proven
00:43:36.160 lie that
00:43:37.880 Nancy Pelosi
00:43:38.620 had access
00:43:40.020 to 10,000 to
00:43:40.880 20,000
00:43:41.740 National Guard
00:43:43.160 and only had
00:43:44.060 to say
00:43:44.420 yes.
00:43:45.860 Only had
00:43:46.320 to say
00:43:46.620 yes.
00:43:47.720 And she
00:43:48.020 said no
00:43:48.660 in writing.
00:43:51.460 Now,
00:43:51.920 why would she
00:43:52.540 not say
00:43:53.220 yes to
00:43:54.240 something so
00:43:55.000 obviously
00:43:55.720 protective?
00:43:59.700 Why?
00:44:00.820 Well,
00:44:01.500 secondly,
00:44:02.120 as Kash Patel
00:44:02.860 points out,
00:44:04.060 Pelosi's
00:44:04.720 daughter was
00:44:06.120 filming a
00:44:06.920 documentary about
00:44:08.240 the events of
00:44:09.040 that day.
00:44:09.940 What would be
00:44:10.740 the better
00:44:11.220 event?
00:44:12.360 What would
00:44:12.780 make that
00:44:13.240 documentary
00:44:13.900 really shine?
00:44:15.980 Well,
00:44:16.760 it wouldn't
00:44:17.420 be if the
00:44:18.440 National Guard
00:44:19.200 came in and
00:44:20.140 made immediate
00:44:22.020 order and
00:44:23.980 prevented people
00:44:24.840 from
00:44:25.240 trespassing.
00:44:27.300 There would
00:44:27.940 have been,
00:44:28.600 what kind of
00:44:29.160 movie would
00:44:29.580 that be?
00:44:30.820 Oh,
00:44:31.020 a bunch of
00:44:31.360 people protested.
00:44:33.120 It was all
00:44:33.560 very peaceful.
00:44:34.760 They went
00:44:35.040 home.
00:44:36.140 Right?
00:44:37.040 So,
00:44:38.160 now here's
00:44:38.700 the question.
00:44:39.400 If you were
00:44:39.880 Nancy Pelosi
00:44:40.640 and you were
00:44:41.240 as clever
00:44:41.940 and as
00:44:42.440 experienced
00:44:43.240 and weaselly
00:44:43.940 as she is,
00:44:45.200 do you think
00:44:45.820 that you would
00:44:46.300 be tempted
00:44:46.860 to let
00:44:48.140 trouble happen,
00:44:49.580 including
00:44:50.060 physical
00:44:50.980 danger trouble,
00:44:52.060 in order for
00:44:53.360 your daughter's
00:44:54.260 career to
00:44:55.020 really take
00:44:55.600 off?
00:44:56.820 And the
00:44:57.240 answer is,
00:44:57.940 that's pretty
00:44:58.520 much what
00:44:59.000 politicians do.
00:45:00.780 They pretty
00:45:01.340 much put
00:45:02.480 other people
00:45:03.120 at risk for
00:45:04.600 their own
00:45:05.140 personal benefit
00:45:06.040 and their
00:45:06.440 family's benefit.
00:45:07.440 That's the
00:45:07.780 most common
00:45:08.320 thing they
00:45:08.700 do.
00:45:09.640 So,
00:45:09.920 yes,
00:45:10.780 I do
00:45:11.880 believe that
00:45:12.560 she would
00:45:13.180 put people's
00:45:14.120 lives at
00:45:14.800 risk,
00:45:15.560 absolutely,
00:45:17.120 to just
00:45:18.000 boost her
00:45:18.600 daughter's
00:45:19.060 career a
00:45:19.560 little bit.
00:45:19.920 I do
00:45:21.260 think that
00:45:22.020 I can't
00:45:22.440 think of
00:45:22.760 a second
00:45:23.220 reason that
00:45:24.540 would make
00:45:24.860 sense to
00:45:25.320 me,
00:45:26.080 why you
00:45:26.460 would
00:45:26.620 decline
00:45:27.060 the
00:45:27.340 National
00:45:27.740 Guard.
00:45:30.460 Right?
00:45:31.480 So,
00:45:32.160 I'm going
00:45:32.540 to say
00:45:32.880 that given
00:45:33.440 the things
00:45:34.680 that we
00:45:35.000 know for
00:45:35.480 sure,
00:45:36.440 daughter was
00:45:37.100 doing a
00:45:37.540 documentary,
00:45:38.800 it got a
00:45:39.200 lot more
00:45:39.560 interesting
00:45:39.960 when the
00:45:41.300 danger
00:45:41.620 started,
00:45:42.620 and that
00:45:42.960 she turned
00:45:43.400 down help
00:45:44.060 that was
00:45:44.580 the obvious
00:45:45.200 help to
00:45:45.740 give,
00:45:46.920 and by
00:45:47.340 the way,
00:45:48.100 why would
00:45:48.520 the person
00:45:48.920 who's
00:45:49.220 planning
00:45:49.920 an insurrection
00:45:50.600 offer to
00:45:52.200 put in
00:45:52.740 place the
00:45:53.740 people who
00:45:54.200 would stop
00:45:54.620 the
00:45:54.820 insurrection?
00:45:56.620 I mean,
00:45:56.940 the whole
00:45:57.180 narrative was
00:45:58.100 completely
00:45:58.520 ridiculous,
00:45:59.380 and Pelosi
00:46:00.300 was behind
00:46:00.980 the narrative.
00:46:01.920 So,
00:46:02.140 I'm going
00:46:02.340 to say
00:46:02.600 that she
00:46:03.020 was directly
00:46:04.780 the cause
00:46:05.680 of the
00:46:07.040 insurrection,
00:46:08.160 and that she
00:46:08.820 knew that she
00:46:09.600 could blame
00:46:10.140 the insurrection
00:46:10.840 on Trump
00:46:13.840 supporters,
00:46:14.660 which she
00:46:15.100 did,
00:46:15.920 if she
00:46:16.580 made sure
00:46:17.020 that there
00:46:18.060 was not
00:46:18.460 enough
00:46:18.780 protection
00:46:19.320 to keep
00:46:19.900 people from
00:46:20.420 getting out
00:46:20.880 of line.
00:46:22.300 So,
00:46:22.900 I'm going
00:46:23.180 to say
00:46:23.560 my current
00:46:24.420 working
00:46:25.740 theory is
00:46:27.560 that the
00:46:27.860 FBI may
00:46:29.200 not have
00:46:29.660 been directly
00:46:30.320 involved,
00:46:31.680 but they
00:46:32.080 wouldn't need
00:46:32.660 to be,
00:46:33.560 because if you
00:46:34.180 have that
00:46:34.520 many angry
00:46:35.160 people,
00:46:36.060 and you
00:46:36.400 have a
00:46:37.140 no show
00:46:37.920 of force,
00:46:39.060 that it
00:46:39.420 looks like
00:46:39.760 they're not
00:46:40.140 in any
00:46:40.480 particular
00:46:40.900 risk,
00:46:41.400 because there's
00:46:41.780 not enough
00:46:42.240 police there,
00:46:44.600 that would be
00:46:45.280 enough to
00:46:45.780 guarantee there
00:46:46.360 would be too
00:46:46.780 much trouble.
00:46:47.380 Now,
00:46:48.880 she may
00:46:49.680 have overplayed
00:46:51.340 her hand,
00:46:51.920 and it may
00:46:52.280 have gotten
00:46:52.640 more dangerous
00:46:53.440 than she
00:46:53.980 imagined it
00:46:54.640 would get,
00:46:55.520 especially
00:46:55.980 dangerous to
00:46:56.840 members of
00:46:58.000 the Congress.
00:46:59.140 So,
00:46:59.540 she may
00:46:59.880 have been
00:47:00.160 surprised that
00:47:00.800 it got worse
00:47:01.320 than she
00:47:01.660 thought,
00:47:02.420 but I'm
00:47:02.900 going to say
00:47:03.220 this is 100%
00:47:04.160 on her.
00:47:05.540 I believe
00:47:06.080 January 6th
00:47:07.400 was an
00:47:08.120 op that
00:47:09.260 was not
00:47:09.740 planned,
00:47:11.060 but rather
00:47:11.960 in an
00:47:12.600 opportunistic
00:47:13.440 way.
00:47:13.880 Pelosi
00:47:14.700 saw a
00:47:15.400 situation
00:47:15.920 forming
00:47:16.520 that they
00:47:17.480 could possibly
00:47:18.060 take out
00:47:18.580 Trump forever,
00:47:19.680 but the
00:47:20.440 risk of it
00:47:21.180 would be
00:47:21.520 some people
00:47:22.020 would get
00:47:22.340 hurt.
00:47:23.520 And I
00:47:23.780 think that's
00:47:24.200 what she
00:47:24.480 did.
00:47:25.680 I believe
00:47:26.520 that she
00:47:26.840 is 100%
00:47:27.900 behind that
00:47:29.640 hoax,
00:47:30.940 and that
00:47:31.680 I don't
00:47:32.280 have any
00:47:32.600 more questions.
00:47:34.240 To me,
00:47:35.040 it's asked
00:47:35.600 and answered.
00:47:36.780 Maybe,
00:47:37.580 maybe there
00:47:38.680 was a
00:47:39.520 handful of
00:47:40.380 FBI guys
00:47:41.500 who were
00:47:41.760 in on
00:47:42.160 something,
00:47:43.260 but I
00:47:43.780 don't see
00:47:44.120 it.
00:47:45.320 You know,
00:47:45.540 you're going
00:47:45.980 to have
00:47:46.140 to do
00:47:46.380 better if
00:47:47.540 you think
00:47:47.960 that the
00:47:48.320 FBI was
00:47:48.940 involved.
00:47:50.020 They may
00:47:50.500 have been,
00:47:51.400 but I
00:47:52.160 don't see
00:47:52.500 it.
00:47:53.040 All I
00:47:53.400 see is
00:47:53.700 numbers,
00:47:54.460 and that's
00:47:55.000 completely
00:47:55.420 different.
00:47:57.280 So,
00:47:58.100 all right.
00:48:00.840 Apparently,
00:48:01.720 according to
00:48:02.520 Fox News,
00:48:03.500 Fannie Mae
00:48:04.020 and Freddie
00:48:04.620 Mack,
00:48:05.120 two big
00:48:05.560 housing
00:48:06.720 giants,
00:48:07.620 are going
00:48:07.900 to leave
00:48:08.280 New York
00:48:08.720 State because
00:48:09.740 it's too
00:48:10.980 sketchy to
00:48:11.660 be there
00:48:12.060 when the
00:48:13.060 Attorney
00:48:13.380 General is
00:48:14.240 Letitia
00:48:14.740 James.
00:48:16.400 So,
00:48:17.380 you might
00:48:17.940 be aware
00:48:18.440 that Bill
00:48:20.500 Pulte has
00:48:21.240 found some
00:48:24.020 news about
00:48:25.020 Letitia
00:48:25.780 James and
00:48:27.380 her paperwork
00:48:29.220 for housing
00:48:30.180 and alleged
00:48:31.380 mortgage-type
00:48:32.880 fraud that's
00:48:33.940 not been
00:48:34.320 proven,
00:48:35.160 alleged.
00:48:36.660 But now
00:48:37.900 this is putting
00:48:38.400 more pressure,
00:48:39.680 taking two
00:48:40.680 big entities,
00:48:42.060 out of the
00:48:42.660 state because
00:48:44.100 it's just
00:48:45.260 too dangerous
00:48:45.860 to be in
00:48:46.360 the state
00:48:46.800 with her
00:48:48.220 there.
00:48:49.040 And I
00:48:49.440 would say
00:48:49.800 that especially
00:48:50.540 now,
00:48:51.260 after those
00:48:52.060 agencies were
00:48:52.980 implicated in
00:48:53.980 implicating her
00:48:55.500 and that we
00:48:56.520 know she's a
00:48:57.140 revenge monster,
00:48:58.740 you have to
00:48:59.680 take your
00:49:00.060 business out of
00:49:00.680 that state.
00:49:01.700 You can't even
00:49:02.740 stay in the
00:49:03.440 state with that
00:49:04.620 Attorney General.
00:49:05.440 It's too risky.
00:49:06.780 So Pulte is
00:49:07.720 right again.
00:49:08.740 He's right
00:49:09.140 again.
00:49:09.980 It would just
00:49:10.680 be dangerous
00:49:11.380 to stay there.
00:49:14.040 Well,
00:49:14.320 David Sachs and
00:49:15.240 others are
00:49:15.840 criticizing this
00:49:16.920 group called
00:49:17.500 the SPLC,
00:49:18.820 the Southern
00:49:19.280 Poverty Law
00:49:20.220 Center,
00:49:20.780 who exists
00:49:21.580 sort of like
00:49:22.620 the ADL
00:49:23.380 does to
00:49:24.720 pretend to be
00:49:25.960 finding bad
00:49:26.940 people and
00:49:27.520 racists,
00:49:28.000 but really
00:49:28.900 they're just a
00:49:29.720 Democrat
00:49:30.420 hit entity
00:49:31.880 trying to act
00:49:32.540 like they're
00:49:32.900 something else.
00:49:34.980 Sachs points
00:49:35.860 out that if
00:49:36.420 you search for
00:49:37.140 Stephen Miller,
00:49:38.460 the first thing
00:49:39.280 that comes up
00:49:40.080 on Google
00:49:41.080 search is
00:49:42.600 something that
00:49:44.540 calls him
00:49:46.200 names.
00:49:46.740 What do you
00:49:47.000 call them?
00:49:49.480 Anyway,
00:49:50.260 so it's
00:49:50.960 something that
00:49:51.440 calls him
00:49:51.840 some kind of
00:49:52.840 a racist or
00:49:53.540 something.
00:49:54.520 And the
00:49:55.380 SPLC also
00:49:58.260 has an article
00:49:59.200 about me
00:49:59.860 from 2020.
00:50:01.400 and it
00:50:02.940 says it
00:50:03.880 was about
00:50:04.320 election
00:50:05.320 denial.
00:50:06.180 So it
00:50:06.400 put me in
00:50:06.800 the election
00:50:07.280 denial category
00:50:08.340 and which
00:50:10.460 by the
00:50:10.780 way,
00:50:11.900 I don't
00:50:12.860 believe I'm
00:50:13.420 an election
00:50:13.840 denier.
00:50:14.820 I have not
00:50:15.700 seen proof
00:50:16.280 that the
00:50:16.660 election was
00:50:17.640 rigged.
00:50:20.340 But they
00:50:21.160 seemed to
00:50:22.040 think that I
00:50:22.680 was on
00:50:23.620 that team
00:50:24.240 about the
00:50:25.920 refusal for
00:50:27.200 Trump to
00:50:27.720 concede.
00:50:29.120 And it
00:50:29.280 said that
00:50:30.140 in a tweet
00:50:30.660 response that
00:50:32.140 I said,
00:50:32.940 this is what
00:50:33.500 they claim,
00:50:34.620 that people
00:50:35.220 have been
00:50:35.580 brainwashed to
00:50:36.420 accept Biden's
00:50:37.420 win.
00:50:39.080 And that
00:50:41.060 that's part of
00:50:41.680 their broader
00:50:42.200 far-right rhetoric.
00:50:43.680 Now, did I
00:50:44.200 say that people
00:50:44.960 are brainwashed
00:50:45.900 to accept
00:50:46.540 Biden's win?
00:50:48.300 I don't know.
00:50:49.700 But that's not
00:50:50.740 a claim about
00:50:51.540 the election
00:50:52.100 itself.
00:50:52.980 That would be
00:50:53.720 a claim about
00:50:54.520 how people
00:50:55.620 come to
00:50:56.080 believe what
00:50:56.540 they believe
00:50:57.040 about the
00:50:57.480 election itself.
00:50:58.180 So I
00:50:59.080 didn't have
00:50:59.400 any comment
00:50:59.900 about whether
00:51:00.380 the election
00:51:00.800 was rigged.
00:51:01.940 My comment
00:51:02.500 was that the
00:51:03.300 individuals who
00:51:04.320 believe it
00:51:04.820 wasn't were
00:51:06.380 brainwashed to
00:51:07.140 believe that.
00:51:07.600 It was not
00:51:07.920 based on any
00:51:09.200 data they could
00:51:09.940 have possibly
00:51:10.480 had access to.
00:51:11.740 It was based
00:51:12.640 on propaganda.
00:51:14.920 But anyway,
00:51:15.880 they throw me
00:51:16.480 on the list so
00:51:17.360 that someday my
00:51:18.260 name will be
00:51:18.740 associated with
00:51:19.540 this hate group
00:51:20.280 or the group
00:51:21.260 that finds hate
00:51:22.000 groups.
00:51:23.020 Great.
00:51:23.300 So the SPLC
00:51:24.740 and ADL
00:51:25.500 really need
00:51:26.080 to be
00:51:26.520 eliminated
00:51:27.360 from the
00:51:28.400 United States.
00:51:29.500 There seems
00:51:29.880 to be a lot
00:51:30.320 of energy
00:51:30.700 to get that
00:51:31.240 done now.
00:51:32.380 So we'll
00:51:32.780 see.
00:51:33.600 I think
00:51:35.060 anybody who
00:51:35.700 donates to
00:51:37.320 either of
00:51:37.760 those groups
00:51:38.380 is just
00:51:39.200 asking for
00:51:39.760 trouble.
00:51:41.300 Because at
00:51:42.160 this point,
00:51:42.640 if somebody
00:51:43.020 found out
00:51:43.480 you donated
00:51:44.500 to either
00:51:45.040 of those
00:51:45.440 groups,
00:51:46.440 you would
00:51:47.240 get boycotted
00:51:48.360 immediately.
00:51:49.800 And you
00:51:50.360 should be.
00:51:51.100 Yeah,
00:51:51.300 they're despicable,
00:51:52.480 both of them.
00:51:54.200 Well,
00:51:54.760 I've been
00:51:54.980 listening to
00:51:55.420 an argument
00:51:55.880 that Scott
00:51:56.820 Galloway
00:51:57.460 has been
00:51:57.880 making about
00:51:58.740 how Israel
00:52:00.060 is not
00:52:00.500 allowed to
00:52:01.080 win a war
00:52:01.660 and that
00:52:02.120 there's a
00:52:02.500 double standard
00:52:03.220 there.
00:52:05.640 And I
00:52:06.300 thought I
00:52:06.540 would just
00:52:06.780 talk about
00:52:07.180 the argument
00:52:07.820 itself.
00:52:08.540 So this
00:52:08.980 is less
00:52:09.600 about Israel.
00:52:10.880 This is
00:52:11.300 just about
00:52:11.940 is this
00:52:12.820 argument good?
00:52:14.140 Okay.
00:52:14.940 So one of
00:52:15.700 the arguments
00:52:16.140 is that
00:52:17.180 in World
00:52:19.320 War II,
00:52:19.860 for example,
00:52:20.620 the U.S.
00:52:21.300 just did
00:52:23.300 horrible
00:52:23.960 things to
00:52:25.260 the civilian
00:52:26.680 populations of
00:52:27.680 Germany and
00:52:28.260 Japan.
00:52:29.280 And nobody
00:52:30.080 called that
00:52:30.720 a genocide.
00:52:32.200 They just
00:52:32.660 said,
00:52:32.980 well,
00:52:33.420 you know,
00:52:33.660 it's a war.
00:52:34.200 And if
00:52:35.360 you're going
00:52:35.580 to win
00:52:35.820 the war,
00:52:36.240 you're
00:52:36.420 going to
00:52:36.460 have to
00:52:36.640 win the
00:52:36.940 war.
00:52:37.380 And it's
00:52:37.740 going to
00:52:37.880 be really
00:52:38.280 ugly.
00:52:39.460 So that
00:52:41.100 would be
00:52:41.600 an example
00:52:43.060 where America
00:52:45.000 was allowed
00:52:45.760 to win a
00:52:46.380 war,
00:52:47.220 whereas Israel
00:52:48.540 is being
00:52:49.540 continuously
00:52:51.480 persuaded
00:52:55.000 to go
00:52:56.800 light on
00:52:57.460 civilian
00:52:57.960 deaths.
00:52:59.620 But
00:53:00.220 it's war.
00:53:02.380 and the,
00:53:03.940 you know,
00:53:04.200 as everybody
00:53:04.840 knows,
00:53:05.320 the civilians
00:53:05.860 are mixed
00:53:06.900 in with
00:53:07.280 the bad
00:53:07.640 guys,
00:53:08.160 so it's
00:53:08.480 extra hard
00:53:09.200 to spare
00:53:11.400 the civilians
00:53:11.980 in this
00:53:12.480 particular
00:53:13.000 case.
00:53:15.020 But here's
00:53:15.840 the part
00:53:16.140 where he
00:53:16.560 loses me.
00:53:17.560 Number
00:53:17.900 one,
00:53:19.160 analogies
00:53:19.880 are a
00:53:20.300 terrible
00:53:20.580 form of
00:53:21.160 argument.
00:53:21.720 Have I
00:53:21.980 ever said
00:53:22.580 that before?
00:53:23.520 Like,
00:53:24.140 almost every
00:53:25.180 day?
00:53:25.980 If you
00:53:26.660 have to
00:53:27.080 use an
00:53:27.520 analogy,
00:53:28.740 it's because
00:53:29.140 you don't
00:53:29.440 have an
00:53:29.760 argument.
00:53:30.060 Once you
00:53:32.220 see that
00:53:32.780 pattern,
00:53:33.800 you'll never
00:53:34.260 be able to
00:53:34.760 unsee it.
00:53:35.340 Let me
00:53:35.500 say it
00:53:35.780 again.
00:53:36.400 If you
00:53:36.780 have to
00:53:37.140 use an
00:53:37.560 analogy,
00:53:38.480 not just
00:53:39.040 if it's
00:53:39.420 a convenience,
00:53:40.780 if it's
00:53:41.140 a convenience
00:53:41.780 for describing
00:53:44.220 something that
00:53:44.920 somebody was
00:53:45.460 unfamiliar with,
00:53:46.820 that's perfectly
00:53:47.600 good use of
00:53:48.180 an analogy.
00:53:49.060 I'm just
00:53:49.500 describing a
00:53:50.360 thing.
00:53:51.140 But if it's
00:53:51.620 your argument
00:53:52.560 that this
00:53:54.120 thing is like
00:53:54.720 this, so they
00:53:55.380 should operate
00:53:55.860 the same,
00:53:56.920 that means you
00:53:57.680 don't have an
00:53:58.140 argument.
00:53:58.420 Because the
00:54:00.000 analogy is
00:54:00.620 never the
00:54:01.040 thing, it's
00:54:01.920 a different
00:54:02.320 thing.
00:54:03.280 You can't
00:54:03.780 argue this
00:54:04.440 thing with a
00:54:05.060 different thing.
00:54:06.440 The fact that
00:54:07.080 something about
00:54:07.860 that thing
00:54:08.360 reminds you of
00:54:09.080 the other
00:54:09.360 thing, there's
00:54:09.860 no argument.
00:54:10.940 That's no
00:54:11.340 argument.
00:54:13.100 So, and
00:54:15.500 to prove my
00:54:16.560 point, was
00:54:17.420 the U.S.
00:54:18.020 allowed to
00:54:18.620 win the war
00:54:19.300 in Afghanistan?
00:54:20.720 No.
00:54:21.420 The U.S.
00:54:21.980 could have
00:54:22.340 killed every
00:54:22.940 civilian in
00:54:23.640 Afghanistan and
00:54:24.760 taken full
00:54:25.400 control of the
00:54:25.980 country.
00:54:27.000 But we
00:54:27.760 didn't.
00:54:28.420 So, we
00:54:28.880 had a
00:54:29.160 constraint.
00:54:30.220 Did we
00:54:30.640 do everything
00:54:31.280 we could
00:54:31.740 have done
00:54:32.140 in Iraq?
00:54:34.520 Not really.
00:54:35.720 I mean, you
00:54:36.120 could say we
00:54:37.020 won the
00:54:37.460 war, but
00:54:38.580 do we
00:54:39.260 own Iraq?
00:54:40.980 Are they
00:54:41.240 even allies?
00:54:42.580 Doesn't look
00:54:43.080 like it to
00:54:43.460 me.
00:54:44.080 I think that
00:54:44.800 we did
00:54:45.940 not have
00:54:47.020 the freedom
00:54:47.520 to destroy
00:54:49.400 enough of
00:54:49.920 Iraq and
00:54:50.500 their civilian
00:54:51.100 base until
00:54:51.800 we owned
00:54:52.220 it.
00:54:53.220 We just
00:54:54.020 didn't have
00:54:54.420 that.
00:54:55.680 So, I
00:54:56.300 would say
00:54:56.600 that the
00:54:57.140 examples are
00:54:58.100 bad.
00:54:58.420 And I
00:54:58.580 would even
00:54:58.900 say attacking
00:54:59.920 Iran, all
00:55:01.340 we could do
00:55:01.900 is attack
00:55:02.400 something that
00:55:03.040 didn't look
00:55:03.460 like it
00:55:03.740 would have
00:55:03.960 much civilian
00:55:05.980 casualties.
00:55:08.380 So, at
00:55:09.080 least not
00:55:09.440 many.
00:55:11.040 So, I
00:55:11.600 would argue
00:55:12.100 that first
00:55:12.500 of all, the
00:55:12.860 analogies don't
00:55:13.760 work.
00:55:15.040 And we're
00:55:15.680 currently in a
00:55:16.620 war with
00:55:17.060 Russia, and
00:55:18.220 we're also not
00:55:19.320 killing too
00:55:20.200 many of their
00:55:20.820 civilians.
00:55:21.440 civilians, right?
00:55:22.180 So, I
00:55:22.740 would argue
00:55:23.120 that probably
00:55:24.260 what's happening
00:55:24.980 is that in
00:55:26.380 the modern
00:55:26.920 world, it's
00:55:27.720 harder to
00:55:28.280 run a war
00:55:29.360 where there
00:55:29.760 are lots of
00:55:30.220 civilian
00:55:30.580 casualties.
00:55:31.480 It has more
00:55:32.180 to do with
00:55:32.620 social media
00:55:33.400 and the fact
00:55:34.700 that the
00:55:35.100 news is not
00:55:35.840 completely
00:55:36.320 controlled by
00:55:37.020 governments
00:55:37.520 anymore, and
00:55:38.600 that people
00:55:38.960 can find out
00:55:39.600 directly what's
00:55:40.340 happening.
00:55:41.220 If the more
00:55:41.820 you know about
00:55:42.620 it, the less
00:55:44.140 freedom the
00:55:45.060 military is going
00:55:45.780 to have.
00:55:46.120 stuff, because
00:55:46.920 there will
00:55:47.120 always be
00:55:47.480 people who
00:55:47.880 say, there's
00:55:48.200 no reason to
00:55:48.720 be killing
00:55:49.060 so many
00:55:49.480 people.
00:55:50.480 But if
00:55:50.800 you're not
00:55:51.120 watching, I
00:55:52.680 mean, if
00:55:53.720 you're not
00:55:54.020 watching, stuff
00:55:55.320 gets done.
00:55:56.500 So, I
00:55:56.880 think it has
00:55:57.240 more to do
00:55:57.860 with the
00:55:58.580 modern landscape
00:56:00.420 of news and
00:56:01.400 information than
00:56:02.540 it does with
00:56:03.280 a double
00:56:06.120 standard.
00:56:07.160 So, that's my
00:56:07.700 first comment.
00:56:08.460 Analogies don't
00:56:09.280 work as
00:56:09.660 arguments.
00:56:10.340 The second
00:56:10.740 thing is that
00:56:11.600 Scott Galloway
00:56:12.400 likes to use the
00:56:13.140 argument that if
00:56:14.360 you looked at
00:56:14.980 it as a
00:56:15.600 percentage,
00:56:16.120 percentage of
00:56:17.760 Israelis that
00:56:18.620 were killed on
00:56:19.280 October 7th, and
00:56:20.840 you applied that
00:56:21.540 percentage to, let's
00:56:22.500 say, the United
00:56:23.100 States, it would
00:56:24.540 be some big
00:56:25.440 number, like
00:56:25.940 35,000 people.
00:56:28.080 And I think he
00:56:28.640 used the example
00:56:29.340 of the hostages
00:56:31.260 would be like, I
00:56:32.280 don't know, the
00:56:32.560 size of a whole
00:56:33.300 college or something
00:56:34.160 like that.
00:56:34.940 And he points
00:56:35.900 out, if that
00:56:36.700 happened to us,
00:56:38.200 35,000 people and
00:56:39.900 that many hostages
00:56:41.240 as a percentage,
00:56:42.740 that we would,
00:56:43.800 you know, we
00:56:44.560 would basically just
00:56:45.480 turn it into a
00:56:46.100 parking lot.
00:56:47.560 He used Mexico
00:56:48.540 as an example.
00:56:49.400 He said, if
00:56:50.140 Mexico did that
00:56:51.120 to us, we
00:56:52.260 would just level
00:56:53.180 Mexico.
00:56:54.260 You know, there
00:56:54.560 wouldn't be any
00:56:54.980 bit left.
00:56:55.900 Now, maybe, maybe
00:56:57.540 yes, or maybe
00:56:58.600 because it's the
00:57:00.080 modern world and
00:57:00.900 everybody would be
00:57:01.620 watching, we
00:57:02.320 wouldn't be able to
00:57:03.220 level Mexico because
00:57:05.020 there would be too
00:57:05.720 much pushback, too
00:57:06.720 much watching.
00:57:08.460 However, I would
00:57:09.560 argue that in this
00:57:10.600 domain, percentage
00:57:11.820 percentage is a
00:57:12.480 propaganda number.
00:57:14.580 That's not an
00:57:16.480 information number.
00:57:18.100 The information
00:57:18.980 number is the
00:57:19.820 number of people.
00:57:21.660 Remember, I always
00:57:22.340 tell you that if
00:57:23.060 somebody concentrates
00:57:24.240 on either the
00:57:25.960 percentage of a
00:57:27.180 thing or the
00:57:28.140 raw number and
00:57:29.380 they try to
00:57:29.880 minimize the
00:57:30.580 other, that's
00:57:31.880 propaganda every
00:57:32.680 time.
00:57:33.700 If you're not
00:57:34.520 willing to say
00:57:35.280 cleanly and
00:57:36.660 clearly, here's
00:57:37.440 both numbers, you
00:57:39.080 know, let's look
00:57:39.580 at them and see
00:57:40.100 what's important.
00:57:41.180 In my opinion, the
00:57:42.300 number of people
00:57:43.020 who died is all
00:57:43.920 that matters.
00:57:46.060 In what world am I
00:57:47.520 supposed to respect
00:57:48.560 the percentage?
00:57:50.280 If one person
00:57:51.460 dies anywhere, that's
00:57:52.520 one person dead.
00:57:53.840 If one American
00:57:54.860 dies, that's a
00:57:55.700 tragedy.
00:57:56.180 If one Israeli
00:57:56.840 dies, that's a
00:57:57.560 tragedy.
00:57:58.920 If a hundred
00:57:59.980 Israelis died, that's
00:58:01.060 a tragedy of a
00:58:02.000 hundred people.
00:58:03.160 If a hundred
00:58:03.680 Americans die, that's
00:58:04.700 a tragedy of
00:58:05.880 exactly the same
00:58:06.860 fucking size.
00:58:08.120 It's a hundred
00:58:08.620 people.
00:58:09.580 The only reason
00:58:10.620 you could say
00:58:11.260 that Israel
00:58:12.140 losing their
00:58:15.180 percentage is
00:58:16.040 somehow worse
00:58:16.880 than if that
00:58:18.220 same number of
00:58:18.920 people died in
00:58:19.480 the United States,
00:58:20.260 the only way you
00:58:21.160 could say that is
00:58:21.900 if you thought the
00:58:22.540 Israelis were the
00:58:23.420 special people, that
00:58:24.820 their lives were
00:58:25.560 worth more than
00:58:26.280 American lives.
00:58:27.540 No, a hundred
00:58:28.340 dead Israelis is
00:58:29.600 worth a hundred
00:58:30.220 dead Americans
00:58:31.100 because they're all
00:58:32.000 the same in
00:58:33.540 terms of the
00:58:34.080 value of life.
00:58:35.100 So now, don't
00:58:35.540 give me this
00:58:35.920 bullshit about
00:58:36.760 higher percentage.
00:58:38.600 I mean, I
00:58:38.900 understand it.
00:58:39.760 I understand how
00:58:40.500 they feel the
00:58:41.120 way they feel.
00:58:42.500 So if the
00:58:43.540 argument is, you
00:58:45.080 know, people
00:58:45.420 would feel worse,
00:58:47.240 I get that.
00:58:49.120 But how they
00:58:49.960 feel is not how
00:58:51.020 they should
00:58:51.480 prosecute war.
00:58:53.160 That's not the
00:58:54.400 basis upon which
00:58:55.320 you run your
00:58:56.420 business.
00:58:56.920 So I think the
00:58:59.240 analogy is
00:59:01.160 propaganda, and I
00:59:02.340 think using that
00:59:03.080 percentage argument
00:59:04.100 is propaganda, and
00:59:05.880 neither of those
00:59:06.580 seem to be as
00:59:07.780 reasonable arguments.
00:59:12.460 Speaking of
00:59:13.300 imaginary Democrat
00:59:14.400 problems, Scott
00:59:16.060 Galloway also on
00:59:17.120 his podcast said
00:59:18.040 he thinks that
00:59:20.340 Trump will gin up
00:59:21.540 a fake crisis
00:59:22.980 before 2028 so
00:59:24.880 that he can use
00:59:25.500 as an example to
00:59:26.620 gain power.
00:59:29.880 And also,
00:59:31.140 Madeline Dean,
00:59:32.440 she's a Democrat
00:59:33.260 from Pennsylvania,
00:59:34.920 she went on CNN
00:59:35.680 recently to claim
00:59:36.600 that Donald Trump
00:59:37.220 is aging and
00:59:38.280 in cognitive
00:59:38.920 decline.
00:59:40.220 What do those
00:59:40.840 two stories have
00:59:41.740 in common?
00:59:43.040 They are imaginary
00:59:44.380 problems.
00:59:45.860 The Democrats are
00:59:47.080 focusing
00:59:47.720 extraordinarily on
00:59:50.880 imaginary problems.
00:59:51.960 well, we imagine
00:59:53.560 there's something
00:59:54.120 wrong with his
00:59:54.780 brain, even though
00:59:55.540 we're not seeing
00:59:56.100 any evidence.
00:59:57.460 We imagine he
00:59:58.480 might try to gin
00:59:59.440 up this problem
01:00:00.280 in the future so
01:00:01.600 they can remain in
01:00:02.620 power, but there's
01:00:03.620 no evidence of
01:00:04.340 that.
01:00:05.620 So once you
01:00:06.400 realize that the
01:00:07.180 Democrats are
01:00:08.320 focusing on
01:00:09.300 imaginary problems,
01:00:11.020 you realize that
01:00:11.940 the reason they do
01:00:12.720 that is they don't
01:00:15.020 have any solutions
01:00:15.820 for real problems.
01:00:17.900 That's why.
01:00:18.700 do you think
01:00:19.760 that they would
01:00:20.200 focus on
01:00:20.800 imaginary problems
01:00:21.860 if they had
01:00:22.900 any kind of
01:00:23.840 idea what to
01:00:25.220 do about a
01:00:25.700 real problem?
01:00:27.420 I don't think
01:00:28.360 so.
01:00:29.680 Anyway.
01:00:31.840 Gavin Newsom
01:00:32.800 found a way to
01:00:33.460 make things worse.
01:00:35.360 So I guess
01:00:36.060 Breitbart News
01:00:38.180 is writing about
01:00:38.820 this, Paul Boyce.
01:00:40.840 He's found a way
01:00:41.840 to create a new
01:00:42.680 problem where
01:00:43.320 there was none.
01:00:44.120 So the federal
01:00:44.900 government has
01:00:46.360 provided standards
01:00:47.960 to colleges
01:00:48.860 to say if you
01:00:51.120 sign this
01:00:51.720 contract and
01:00:52.660 you agree to
01:00:53.420 this kind of
01:00:54.460 behavior that
01:00:55.260 you know what
01:00:56.180 Trump would ask
01:00:56.760 for, right?
01:00:57.600 Less DEI and
01:00:59.020 less men wearing
01:01:01.180 dresses and sports
01:01:02.320 and stuff like
01:01:02.920 that.
01:01:03.740 So you know
01:01:04.500 what Trump is
01:01:05.180 going to ask
01:01:05.500 for, but if
01:01:06.480 the colleges
01:01:07.240 sign that, then
01:01:09.100 they would have
01:01:09.600 full access to
01:01:10.720 their government
01:01:11.520 funding, but if
01:01:12.820 they're not
01:01:13.180 willing to, they
01:01:13.980 might have some
01:01:15.260 of their
01:01:15.480 federal funding
01:01:16.960 withheld.
01:01:17.400 Well, Governor
01:01:18.700 Newsom, never
01:01:21.200 one to let a
01:01:22.300 good situation
01:01:23.320 persist, decided
01:01:26.360 that he would
01:01:27.120 withhold state
01:01:29.240 funds from
01:01:30.420 colleges if they
01:01:31.720 do sign it.
01:01:33.120 So now he's
01:01:33.760 created a
01:01:34.320 situation where
01:01:35.120 colleges will
01:01:35.940 definitely lose.
01:01:38.720 That's a
01:01:39.840 Democrat plan.
01:01:41.140 So the
01:01:41.560 college will
01:01:42.100 lose if it
01:01:42.860 doesn't sign
01:01:43.540 the federal
01:01:44.040 contract.
01:01:44.740 contract, and
01:01:46.300 now because
01:01:47.180 of Newsom, they
01:01:49.040 have a second
01:01:49.640 way to lose,
01:01:50.580 which is if
01:01:51.300 they do sign
01:01:52.020 the contract.
01:01:53.700 What exactly
01:01:54.660 did the
01:01:55.120 Democrats add
01:01:56.080 to the
01:01:56.540 world?
01:01:57.920 They removed
01:01:58.860 the only
01:01:59.340 escape path,
01:02:00.540 because it's
01:02:01.580 not as if the
01:02:02.280 colleges couldn't
01:02:03.660 agree to stop
01:02:04.820 discriminating and
01:02:06.440 being anti-Semitic.
01:02:08.080 How hard is it
01:02:09.060 to sign the
01:02:09.580 contract that
01:02:10.260 says, yeah,
01:02:10.740 we'll try really
01:02:11.340 hard not to be
01:02:12.020 anti-Semitic,
01:02:12.840 and we'll stop
01:02:13.760 discriminating.
01:02:15.360 That's not
01:02:16.080 exactly some
01:02:18.260 big problem,
01:02:20.040 but Newsom
01:02:21.620 turned it into
01:02:22.280 one.
01:02:23.100 So there's no
01:02:23.920 good news that
01:02:24.740 he can't turn
01:02:25.380 into bad news.
01:02:26.460 How about that
01:02:27.100 bullet train,
01:02:28.060 huh?
01:02:30.360 So here's a
01:02:31.580 shocker.
01:02:32.160 You won't
01:02:32.560 believe this.
01:02:33.240 I mean, this
01:02:33.680 will be the
01:02:34.060 most surprising,
01:02:35.000 amazing thing.
01:02:36.200 Can you
01:02:36.840 believe this?
01:02:38.240 Hamas,
01:02:38.860 military chief,
01:02:39.940 has rejected
01:02:40.660 Trump's
01:02:41.220 ceasefire deal.
01:02:42.840 I was so
01:02:45.140 sure Hamas
01:02:46.040 was going to
01:02:46.600 surrender.
01:02:48.360 No, I
01:02:49.000 wasn't.
01:02:50.060 There was no
01:02:50.900 chance that
01:02:51.480 Hamas was ever
01:02:52.440 going to say
01:02:53.040 yes to this
01:02:53.780 deal.
01:02:54.780 There was no
01:02:55.600 chance.
01:02:56.420 They're not
01:02:56.860 going to give
01:02:57.220 up the
01:02:57.520 hostages.
01:02:58.260 They're not
01:02:58.540 going to
01:02:58.780 surrender.
01:02:59.820 They're not
01:03:00.080 going to
01:03:01.200 essentially
01:03:01.820 commit suicide
01:03:03.580 by surrendering.
01:03:05.240 They'll either
01:03:05.600 be in jail
01:03:06.320 forever or
01:03:06.960 they'll get
01:03:07.280 hunted down
01:03:07.880 and murdered
01:03:08.940 separately.
01:03:10.120 And no
01:03:10.520 matter what the
01:03:11.060 agreement is,
01:03:11.740 they're going to
01:03:12.080 get hunted down
01:03:12.740 and murdered.
01:03:13.540 Do you think
01:03:13.940 that the
01:03:14.280 Hamas military
01:03:15.280 chief would
01:03:16.580 be alive a
01:03:17.560 year after
01:03:18.080 they surrendered
01:03:18.960 even if
01:03:19.940 Israel said,
01:03:21.640 all right,
01:03:21.920 we promise you
01:03:22.640 safety.
01:03:23.340 If we can get
01:03:24.260 our hostages
01:03:25.700 back, we
01:03:27.800 won't go after
01:03:28.480 anybody.
01:03:29.220 Do you think
01:03:30.060 that guy's going
01:03:30.700 to be alive in
01:03:31.320 a year?
01:03:32.480 No.
01:03:33.540 The only way
01:03:34.360 he stays alive
01:03:35.200 is if he stays
01:03:36.500 in his little
01:03:37.040 tunnel or
01:03:37.620 wherever the
01:03:38.000 hell he is
01:03:38.520 and keeps
01:03:39.960 trying to be
01:03:40.460 relevant.
01:03:40.820 Otherwise,
01:03:41.480 he'll be
01:03:41.760 very dead
01:03:42.420 and very
01:03:42.880 not relevant.
01:03:44.360 So, of course,
01:03:45.040 he's not going
01:03:45.540 to take the
01:03:45.960 deal.
01:03:47.860 However, that
01:03:49.020 would be a
01:03:49.620 giant win for
01:03:50.480 Israel because
01:03:51.740 Israel will
01:03:52.720 look like they
01:03:53.580 made a
01:03:54.060 legitimate offer
01:03:54.980 and it was
01:03:55.800 pretty legitimate.
01:03:57.660 I would say it
01:03:58.580 was close enough
01:03:59.840 to legitimate
01:04:00.540 that maybe they
01:04:01.460 could have
01:04:01.760 tweaked it a
01:04:02.320 little bit,
01:04:03.380 but Hamas is
01:04:04.720 not in the
01:04:05.380 tweaking mode.
01:04:06.140 They're just
01:04:06.560 turning it
01:04:07.180 down.
01:04:08.260 So, that's
01:04:09.120 going to give
01:04:09.680 Israel a free
01:04:11.060 pass to do
01:04:11.760 whatever they
01:04:12.200 need now.
01:04:12.860 So, it looks
01:04:13.220 like they'll
01:04:13.640 just clear out
01:04:15.560 Gaza and you
01:04:16.720 can call it
01:04:17.260 whatever you
01:04:17.640 want to call
01:04:18.060 it.
01:04:18.700 Ontario, the
01:04:19.820 wait is over.
01:04:21.080 The gold
01:04:21.460 standard of
01:04:22.000 online casinos
01:04:22.840 has arrived.
01:04:23.900 Golden Nugget
01:04:24.600 Online Casino
01:04:25.460 is live,
01:04:26.180 bringing Vegas
01:04:26.840 style excitement
01:04:27.620 and a world
01:04:28.360 class gaming
01:04:29.040 experience right
01:04:30.020 to your
01:04:30.540 fingertips.
01:04:31.520 Whether you're
01:04:31.960 a seasoned
01:04:32.360 player or just
01:04:33.260 starting,
01:04:33.860 signing up is
01:04:34.420 fast and
01:04:35.280 simple.
01:04:35.800 And in
01:04:36.340 just a few
01:04:36.800 clicks, you
01:04:37.360 can have
01:04:37.640 access to
01:04:38.200 our exclusive
01:04:38.800 library of
01:04:39.480 the best slots
01:04:40.340 and top-tier
01:04:41.180 table games.
01:04:42.220 Make the
01:04:42.540 most of your
01:04:43.100 downtime with
01:04:43.800 unbeatable
01:04:44.540 promotions and
01:04:45.340 jackpots that
01:04:46.000 can turn any
01:04:46.740 mundane moment
01:04:47.620 into a golden
01:04:48.500 opportunity at
01:04:49.520 Golden Nugget
01:04:50.380 Online Casino.
01:04:51.700 Take a spin on
01:04:52.320 the slots,
01:04:53.040 challenge yourself
01:04:53.620 at the tables,
01:04:54.420 or join a
01:04:55.020 live dealer game
01:04:55.840 to feel the
01:04:56.520 thrill of
01:04:57.080 real-time action,
01:04:58.160 all from the
01:04:58.840 comfort of your
01:04:59.400 own devices.
01:05:00.380 Why settle for
01:05:01.000 less when you
01:05:01.740 can go for the
01:05:02.460 gold at
01:05:03.240 Golden Nugget
01:05:04.140 Online Casino?
01:05:05.260 Gambling problem?
01:05:06.600 Call Connex
01:05:07.160 Ontario,
01:05:07.920 1-866-531-2600.
01:05:10.900 19 and over.
01:05:11.800 Physically present
01:05:12.360 in Ontario.
01:05:13.180 Eligibility
01:05:13.640 restrictions apply.
01:05:14.800 See
01:05:14.940 GoldenNuggetCasino.com
01:05:16.480 for details.
01:05:17.260 Please play
01:05:17.660 responsibly.
01:05:18.320 Well, Tucker Carlson
01:05:20.660 has made a video
01:05:24.240 which was quite
01:05:25.320 provocative, and
01:05:26.620 his point was
01:05:27.900 that Israel has
01:05:31.440 too much impact
01:05:32.900 on American
01:05:33.740 leadership and
01:05:35.380 American policy,
01:05:36.380 and he wanted
01:05:37.940 four things
01:05:39.260 changed that he
01:05:40.840 thinks would make
01:05:41.440 the situation
01:05:42.120 better.
01:05:42.580 Now, I'm
01:05:44.220 just going to
01:05:44.620 say this is
01:05:45.300 Tucker's
01:05:45.900 argument,
01:05:46.620 right?
01:05:47.460 So, don't
01:05:48.040 associate it
01:05:48.680 with me.
01:05:50.000 I'm just
01:05:50.720 telling you an
01:05:51.400 interesting news
01:05:52.160 story that a
01:05:53.200 major voice in
01:05:55.560 the media is
01:05:57.160 saying something
01:05:57.760 that's kind of
01:05:59.080 risky, kind of
01:06:00.180 provocative, but
01:06:01.860 he makes a point.
01:06:03.140 I'll see if I can
01:06:03.800 summarize it.
01:06:04.520 It's a pretty long
01:06:05.160 video, but
01:06:06.480 actually worth
01:06:07.080 watching, the
01:06:07.780 whole thing,
01:06:08.920 because his
01:06:09.700 argument is
01:06:10.620 interesting, there
01:06:11.640 are places where
01:06:12.680 I would have
01:06:13.640 said, hmm, too
01:06:14.700 far, or maybe
01:06:15.600 you should have
01:06:15.980 put that in
01:06:16.440 context better,
01:06:17.540 but that's not
01:06:18.160 the point.
01:06:19.120 The point is not
01:06:19.820 whether I agree
01:06:20.660 with him or not.
01:06:21.480 The point today is
01:06:23.420 he's making the
01:06:24.180 argument at all.
01:06:25.980 So, that's what
01:06:26.860 I'm going to be
01:06:27.220 talking about,
01:06:27.760 just the bravery
01:06:29.140 and the risk it
01:06:30.400 takes to make
01:06:31.080 this argument.
01:06:32.460 His bigger point
01:06:33.680 is that Israel is
01:06:35.220 a tiny little
01:06:36.040 country of 9
01:06:36.820 million people
01:06:37.480 with an economy
01:06:39.900 less than New
01:06:40.800 Jersey and a
01:06:41.680 physical size
01:06:42.440 less than New
01:06:43.060 Jersey, and that
01:06:44.500 we should not
01:06:45.160 consider it our
01:06:46.160 most important
01:06:47.040 thing, and that
01:06:50.780 we act as
01:06:51.640 though nothing's
01:06:53.280 more important
01:06:53.820 than Israel.
01:06:55.140 And he is
01:06:56.040 trying to put
01:06:56.960 that back in
01:06:57.560 context and say,
01:06:58.680 actually, they
01:06:59.980 don't matter to
01:07:00.760 us at all.
01:07:01.920 Now, I know
01:07:02.340 what you're going
01:07:02.660 to say, but
01:07:03.380 yes, Scott, they
01:07:04.220 do matter.
01:07:04.880 Why didn't he
01:07:05.480 mention that
01:07:07.440 they give
01:07:10.060 us a, you
01:07:12.440 know, some
01:07:13.700 purchase in the
01:07:14.520 Middle East, and
01:07:15.460 it allows us to
01:07:17.020 fight them over
01:07:17.720 there before, you
01:07:19.120 know, the bad
01:07:19.540 guys come in
01:07:20.240 fighting over
01:07:20.720 here, and all
01:07:21.580 that.
01:07:21.920 So, everybody
01:07:22.480 knows the other
01:07:23.100 argument, and he
01:07:24.540 downplayed those.
01:07:27.580 That would be
01:07:28.220 fair to say.
01:07:29.100 He was making
01:07:29.960 his points, and
01:07:31.860 when you make
01:07:32.400 your point, you
01:07:34.060 have that
01:07:34.420 documentary effect
01:07:35.600 where the
01:07:36.680 whole point is
01:07:37.440 that, you
01:07:38.020 know, if you
01:07:38.440 listen to a
01:07:38.960 91-minute video,
01:07:40.220 it's pretty long.
01:07:42.700 It's not going
01:07:43.420 to be both
01:07:43.900 sides.
01:07:44.860 And when you're
01:07:45.400 done, you're
01:07:45.800 going to be
01:07:46.000 pretty persuaded
01:07:46.760 because you
01:07:47.200 listened to one
01:07:47.880 point of view
01:07:48.420 for a long
01:07:48.940 period of time.
01:07:49.660 That's the
01:07:50.420 documentary
01:07:50.920 problem.
01:07:52.760 So, beware of
01:07:53.480 the documentary
01:07:53.940 problem on that,
01:07:55.180 but you should be
01:07:56.820 aware of the
01:07:57.420 argument.
01:07:59.500 So, he doesn't
01:08:00.380 want the U.S.
01:08:01.440 to be ordered
01:08:02.120 around by a
01:08:02.940 client state.
01:08:03.920 He's heard
01:08:04.580 stories of
01:08:05.520 Mossad marching
01:08:07.440 into the
01:08:07.900 Pentagon and
01:08:08.760 giving orders to
01:08:10.460 the American
01:08:10.940 military.
01:08:12.080 I don't know if
01:08:12.680 I believe those
01:08:13.340 stories.
01:08:14.180 That sounds
01:08:14.680 exaggerated to
01:08:15.500 me.
01:08:16.360 Here's what seems
01:08:17.540 more likely
01:08:18.300 true.
01:08:19.280 So, the story
01:08:20.080 is that Mossad
01:08:20.880 could just walk
01:08:21.960 into the
01:08:22.340 Pentagon and
01:08:23.060 walk into a
01:08:23.660 meeting and
01:08:24.160 tell people what
01:08:24.940 to do.
01:08:26.160 That feels
01:08:27.120 like a little
01:08:28.560 bit of a
01:08:30.060 narrative.
01:08:31.360 It does seem
01:08:32.420 to me that if
01:08:33.840 the topic was
01:08:37.100 a war in
01:08:37.940 which Israel
01:08:38.680 was the main
01:08:39.620 player, that
01:08:41.420 the people who
01:08:42.060 were the main
01:08:42.580 players would
01:08:43.220 have the most
01:08:43.820 information and
01:08:45.380 the most
01:08:45.940 incentive to
01:08:47.300 talk to the
01:08:47.920 right people and
01:08:48.920 also the
01:08:49.860 confidence to
01:08:50.640 say, you have
01:08:51.540 to do this.
01:08:53.180 You're just
01:08:53.760 going to have to
01:08:54.200 do this.
01:08:54.680 Let me explain.
01:08:55.300 We know
01:08:55.580 everything about
01:08:56.140 the area.
01:08:57.320 You're going to
01:08:57.900 have to be with
01:08:58.520 us.
01:08:58.740 You're going to
01:08:59.000 have to do
01:08:59.400 this.
01:08:59.960 Now, we might
01:09:00.640 disagree.
01:09:01.980 Maybe we don't
01:09:02.700 have to do
01:09:03.180 that.
01:09:04.260 Maybe that's
01:09:04.940 not necessary.
01:09:05.900 Maybe that's
01:09:06.280 not in our
01:09:06.660 best interest.
01:09:08.000 But it
01:09:09.460 certainly makes
01:09:10.400 sense that the
01:09:11.040 people who are
01:09:11.560 closest to it
01:09:12.720 and feel that
01:09:14.140 it's an
01:09:14.580 existential risk,
01:09:15.940 which it was
01:09:16.660 for Israel.
01:09:17.800 Israel is
01:09:18.440 dealing with an
01:09:19.020 existential risk.
01:09:20.920 So, yeah,
01:09:21.760 they're going to
01:09:22.140 be a little bit
01:09:22.980 insistent that
01:09:24.960 you do what
01:09:25.620 they need to
01:09:27.000 survive.
01:09:28.440 Right?
01:09:28.860 So, if they're
01:09:29.880 a little bit
01:09:30.520 arrogant, a little
01:09:31.460 bit pushy, you
01:09:34.380 have every right
01:09:35.020 not to like
01:09:35.640 that.
01:09:36.900 But I
01:09:37.480 certainly
01:09:37.760 understand it.
01:09:39.300 Right?
01:09:40.740 If you were
01:09:41.600 Israel and
01:09:42.880 you thought it
01:09:43.640 was an
01:09:43.960 existential risk,
01:09:45.600 it was that
01:09:46.140 important, you'd
01:09:47.320 push.
01:09:48.180 You would push
01:09:49.180 until somebody
01:09:50.000 was really
01:09:50.740 unhappy how
01:09:51.540 hard you were
01:09:51.960 pushing.
01:09:53.120 So, does that
01:09:53.900 bother me?
01:09:54.920 Well, I don't
01:09:56.220 know enough
01:09:56.680 about, you
01:09:57.420 know, I think
01:09:57.960 you'd have to
01:09:58.380 be in the
01:09:59.060 room to know
01:10:00.260 if they push
01:10:00.860 too hard, but
01:10:02.580 I don't
01:10:02.880 mind that
01:10:03.380 there's a
01:10:03.760 little bit
01:10:04.140 of a push
01:10:06.220 back.
01:10:07.140 That seems
01:10:07.720 healthy.
01:10:09.740 Obviously, you
01:10:10.520 can't let
01:10:10.900 Israel run
01:10:11.540 the Pentagon,
01:10:12.780 but in the
01:10:14.440 case where
01:10:14.900 they know
01:10:15.380 the most
01:10:15.940 and have
01:10:16.420 the most
01:10:16.820 at stake,
01:10:18.680 yeah, of
01:10:19.740 course you
01:10:20.080 get to
01:10:20.240 listen to
01:10:20.600 them.
01:10:22.380 So, anyway,
01:10:24.940 let's see,
01:10:26.000 and then
01:10:26.380 Tucker says
01:10:28.880 that we
01:10:29.160 should adjust
01:10:30.060 our theological
01:10:31.080 view of
01:10:32.600 Israel because
01:10:33.180 a lot of
01:10:33.620 Christians
01:10:35.080 believe that
01:10:35.980 God favors
01:10:36.880 certain people
01:10:37.620 in certain
01:10:38.240 real estate,
01:10:39.800 and Tucker
01:10:40.680 says, no,
01:10:41.440 God doesn't
01:10:41.980 do that.
01:10:43.180 That's the
01:10:43.580 opposite of
01:10:44.080 what God
01:10:44.460 does.
01:10:44.860 Everybody's
01:10:45.260 equal.
01:10:45.740 There's no
01:10:46.100 chosen people.
01:10:48.040 Tucker thinks
01:10:49.380 AIPAC should
01:10:50.140 be registered
01:10:51.500 as a foreign
01:10:52.660 agent.
01:10:54.400 It's one of
01:10:55.680 the few that
01:10:56.260 is not.
01:10:56.700 There's some
01:10:57.420 technical reason
01:10:58.420 why they're
01:10:58.820 not.
01:11:00.580 I think the
01:11:01.220 technical reason,
01:11:02.280 well, it's not
01:11:02.660 even technical.
01:11:04.140 It's a direct
01:11:05.000 reason.
01:11:05.820 The reason AIPAC
01:11:06.740 is not
01:11:07.280 registered is
01:11:08.840 because it's a
01:11:09.520 bunch of
01:11:09.800 Americans doing
01:11:11.640 things for
01:11:12.280 America.
01:11:13.000 I don't know.
01:11:14.980 That doesn't
01:11:15.780 even make sense.
01:11:16.960 I've heard an
01:11:17.860 argument why
01:11:18.800 they're the
01:11:19.240 exception, and
01:11:20.100 I can't remember
01:11:20.900 it now, which
01:11:21.960 makes me think
01:11:22.660 it's not a very
01:11:23.320 good argument.
01:11:23.880 So there
01:11:26.640 might be a
01:11:27.100 technical reason
01:11:27.980 they're not, but
01:11:28.840 I would agree
01:11:29.420 with the idea
01:11:32.180 that anybody
01:11:32.800 who's influencing
01:11:33.500 the U.S.
01:11:34.300 in that way,
01:11:35.740 you would want
01:11:36.400 them to be part
01:11:37.140 of FARA, but
01:11:37.900 I don't see how
01:11:38.360 it would make
01:11:38.600 any difference.
01:11:39.640 What difference
01:11:40.140 would it make?
01:11:41.080 If they
01:11:41.640 registered to
01:11:42.400 be a FARA
01:11:43.360 entity, isn't
01:11:45.460 that just
01:11:45.780 paperwork?
01:11:47.600 Wouldn't
01:11:47.940 they do
01:11:48.340 exactly the
01:11:49.000 same things
01:11:49.500 they're doing?
01:11:50.940 I don't know
01:11:51.600 how that makes
01:11:52.080 a difference.
01:11:53.880 Somebody will
01:11:54.440 tell me.
01:11:56.500 And then
01:11:56.880 Tucker said
01:11:57.600 he doesn't
01:11:58.240 like dual
01:11:58.880 citizenship, but
01:12:00.260 not limited to
01:12:01.240 Israel, but
01:12:02.600 limited to
01:12:03.500 anybody.
01:12:05.760 So apparently
01:12:06.680 there are a
01:12:07.120 number of dual
01:12:07.800 citizenship people
01:12:09.440 in Congress.
01:12:10.380 So he's talking
01:12:11.180 about Congress
01:12:11.800 specifically.
01:12:12.820 He doesn't
01:12:13.240 like people in
01:12:13.880 Congress having
01:12:14.500 dual citizenship.
01:12:15.960 What do you
01:12:16.500 think about that?
01:12:17.740 Do you think
01:12:18.100 people in Congress
01:12:18.940 should have dual
01:12:19.680 citizenship?
01:12:20.240 I say no.
01:12:23.260 Yeah, no.
01:12:24.540 This has nothing
01:12:25.460 to do with
01:12:25.880 Israel.
01:12:27.160 I mean, it
01:12:27.800 does have to
01:12:28.260 do with Israel,
01:12:28.860 but not
01:12:30.140 because of
01:12:30.720 Israel.
01:12:31.680 I don't want
01:12:32.760 anybody in
01:12:33.300 Congress with
01:12:33.900 dual citizenship.
01:12:35.660 I don't want
01:12:36.420 to have to
01:12:36.780 worry about
01:12:38.380 any dual
01:12:39.740 loyalties.
01:12:40.540 I'm not
01:12:40.780 criticizing
01:12:41.860 anybody, but
01:12:43.180 you shouldn't
01:12:43.640 even have the
01:12:44.220 appearance.
01:12:45.940 You should
01:12:46.380 manage the
01:12:47.300 appearance of
01:12:48.020 it as much
01:12:48.660 as the
01:12:49.000 actuality.
01:12:50.440 So yeah,
01:12:50.980 I'm not in
01:12:52.180 favor of
01:12:52.520 dual citizenship
01:12:53.260 for people
01:12:54.760 in Congress.
01:12:57.180 He says we
01:12:58.080 should be
01:12:58.400 more America
01:12:58.980 first, and
01:13:00.080 I guess
01:13:03.140 that's it.
01:13:04.760 So the
01:13:05.780 brave part
01:13:06.400 about this
01:13:06.980 is that
01:13:07.600 Tucker is
01:13:08.160 being accused
01:13:08.740 of being
01:13:09.060 anti-Semitic
01:13:10.040 because he
01:13:10.620 doesn't spend
01:13:12.480 as much
01:13:13.080 time talking
01:13:14.580 in a pro-Israel
01:13:15.600 way as he
01:13:16.260 talks in a
01:13:16.980 negative Israel
01:13:17.600 way.
01:13:17.860 But I
01:13:18.740 would argue
01:13:19.160 that the
01:13:19.820 pro-Israel
01:13:21.460 argument is
01:13:22.320 so completely
01:13:23.700 obvious that
01:13:24.600 you don't
01:13:24.980 need to
01:13:25.360 talk about
01:13:25.800 it.
01:13:26.560 Is anybody
01:13:27.460 in favor
01:13:28.320 of Hamas
01:13:29.200 massacring
01:13:31.540 people?
01:13:32.860 I mean,
01:13:33.280 do you have
01:13:33.980 to mention
01:13:34.380 that every
01:13:34.920 time you
01:13:35.320 talk about
01:13:35.880 it?
01:13:36.260 Not really,
01:13:37.060 because everybody
01:13:37.560 is on the
01:13:37.940 same side.
01:13:39.500 Do you
01:13:40.140 have to say
01:13:40.760 that we
01:13:41.520 don't want
01:13:42.100 radical,
01:13:43.440 extremist,
01:13:44.200 Islamic
01:13:44.620 people to
01:13:46.240 take over
01:13:47.200 Israel?
01:13:48.080 Of course
01:13:48.480 we don't.
01:13:49.480 Of course
01:13:50.040 we don't.
01:13:50.880 Tucker
01:13:51.120 doesn't.
01:13:51.760 Nobody
01:13:52.180 does.
01:13:53.120 So I'm
01:13:53.440 not sure
01:13:53.760 how much
01:13:54.100 you even
01:13:54.360 need to
01:13:54.660 say that
01:13:55.160 stuff.
01:13:56.960 But you
01:13:57.540 might have
01:13:57.880 to say
01:13:58.180 some other
01:13:58.600 stuff.
01:14:00.320 Anyway,
01:14:01.120 so I put
01:14:01.780 my own
01:14:02.160 comment on
01:14:02.920 a post
01:14:03.840 on it,
01:14:04.260 and here's
01:14:04.700 what I
01:14:05.020 said,
01:14:06.200 causing
01:14:06.620 some trouble
01:14:07.240 myself.
01:14:07.880 I said,
01:14:08.240 as a rule,
01:14:08.800 I don't
01:14:09.120 criticize Israel
01:14:10.040 because that
01:14:10.600 would be a
01:14:11.080 career death
01:14:11.960 wish,
01:14:12.320 as literally
01:14:13.640 everyone
01:14:14.300 knows.
01:14:15.560 I don't
01:14:15.940 expect
01:14:16.300 Tucker to
01:14:16.860 survive this
01:14:17.480 unscathed
01:14:18.160 career-wise.
01:14:19.440 Career-wise,
01:14:20.240 I don't
01:14:20.560 expect him
01:14:21.160 to be
01:14:21.420 unscathed,
01:14:22.180 which will
01:14:22.840 prove his
01:14:23.360 point.
01:14:24.520 That will
01:14:25.180 prove his
01:14:25.600 point if he
01:14:26.400 can't even
01:14:26.820 talk about it
01:14:27.540 with free
01:14:28.180 speech.
01:14:31.240 So what do
01:14:32.080 you think
01:14:32.320 happened when
01:14:33.040 I said I
01:14:33.660 won't
01:14:34.040 criticize
01:14:34.500 Israel?
01:14:35.080 I was
01:14:37.120 attacked by
01:14:37.920 pro-Israel
01:14:38.500 people for
01:14:40.360 saying that
01:14:40.880 I won't
01:14:41.420 criticize
01:14:41.980 Israel.
01:14:43.800 That
01:14:44.360 actually
01:14:45.040 happened.
01:14:47.020 So you
01:14:49.420 can attack
01:14:49.960 for being
01:14:50.400 a racist
01:14:50.820 for saying
01:14:52.040 that you
01:14:52.440 don't want
01:14:53.080 to take
01:14:53.580 the risk
01:14:54.040 of attacking
01:14:54.720 Israel,
01:14:55.580 because if
01:14:56.080 you do,
01:14:57.160 with any
01:14:57.720 criticism at
01:14:59.060 all,
01:14:59.560 you'll be
01:14:59.920 called a
01:15:00.320 racist.
01:15:01.320 And to
01:15:01.620 prove me
01:15:02.080 wrong,
01:15:02.520 people called
01:15:03.040 me a
01:15:03.320 racist.
01:15:04.400 To prove
01:15:04.840 me
01:15:05.000 wrong.
01:15:06.340 That's
01:15:06.780 what I
01:15:07.020 said would
01:15:07.380 be the
01:15:07.620 problem.
01:15:08.640 So to
01:15:09.260 prove me
01:15:09.680 wrong,
01:15:09.960 they proved
01:15:10.300 me right.
01:15:12.120 What else
01:15:12.780 do I need
01:15:13.180 to say?
01:15:15.760 And then
01:15:16.440 they were
01:15:16.720 also so
01:15:17.400 fucking
01:15:17.760 dumb that
01:15:18.300 they didn't
01:15:18.720 know that I
01:15:19.180 just gave
01:15:19.640 the ultimate
01:15:20.200 criticism to
01:15:21.120 Israel by
01:15:21.680 saying that I
01:15:22.280 wasn't allowed
01:15:22.760 to criticize
01:15:23.280 them.
01:15:24.660 Wake up,
01:15:25.240 people.
01:15:26.860 Wake the
01:15:27.540 fuck up.
01:15:28.900 All right.
01:15:29.500 The Israeli
01:15:30.300 Navy also
01:15:31.540 intercepted the
01:15:33.520 global
01:15:34.160 Samud
01:15:35.160 flotilla.
01:15:36.840 That's the
01:15:37.580 Greta
01:15:37.920 Thunberg
01:15:39.040 flotilla.
01:15:40.100 Greta did
01:15:40.520 a little
01:15:40.780 video saying
01:15:41.540 that she'd
01:15:41.920 been captured
01:15:42.580 by the
01:15:44.380 Israeli
01:15:44.880 Navy.
01:15:46.600 Grok tells
01:15:47.740 us that
01:15:48.500 most of
01:15:50.020 the flotilla
01:15:50.820 has been
01:15:51.720 rounded up
01:15:52.400 by the
01:15:52.940 Israelis,
01:15:53.600 but because
01:15:54.540 it caused
01:15:55.120 a, I
01:15:56.440 guess,
01:15:56.660 a disruption
01:15:57.320 in the
01:15:58.020 Israeli
01:15:58.420 Navy to
01:15:59.660 go, you
01:16:00.360 know, deal
01:16:00.660 with these
01:16:01.000 people.
01:16:01.480 It allowed
01:16:01.860 the local
01:16:02.480 fishermen to
01:16:04.120 fish the
01:16:04.900 coastal areas
01:16:05.740 for the
01:16:06.120 first time
01:16:06.560 in years,
01:16:07.340 and they
01:16:09.140 got this
01:16:09.500 substantial
01:16:10.020 fish catch.
01:16:11.440 So they're
01:16:12.300 worried about
01:16:12.780 starving, and
01:16:14.000 apparently they're
01:16:15.220 banned from
01:16:16.060 fishing in
01:16:17.640 their own
01:16:18.260 waters.
01:16:18.980 So I'm
01:16:20.840 sure there's
01:16:21.320 another side
01:16:22.400 to that
01:16:22.800 story, because
01:16:24.280 you got to
01:16:24.700 make sure
01:16:25.780 that the
01:16:26.180 water's not
01:16:26.680 being used
01:16:27.420 to ship
01:16:28.660 in a bunch
01:16:29.060 of weapons,
01:16:30.080 which they
01:16:30.500 would.
01:16:31.340 If fishing
01:16:31.920 were allowed,
01:16:32.760 I'm sure
01:16:33.140 that it would
01:16:33.920 take 10
01:16:34.380 seconds for
01:16:35.000 somebody to
01:16:35.500 put some
01:16:35.960 illegal weapons
01:16:37.200 on a
01:16:37.540 fishing boat
01:16:38.180 and try to
01:16:39.320 get that
01:16:40.120 in.
01:16:42.720 So Greta
01:16:43.720 is captured.
01:16:46.800 And yesterday
01:16:47.800 I told you
01:16:48.360 there was
01:16:48.740 allegedly a
01:16:50.260 story that
01:16:50.780 the flotilla
01:16:51.500 had been
01:16:52.120 funded by
01:16:53.740 some Hamas
01:16:55.020 entities.
01:16:56.620 I don't
01:16:56.980 know if
01:16:57.240 that's proven
01:16:57.740 or not.
01:16:59.700 All right.
01:17:01.240 In other
01:17:02.040 news, the
01:17:02.600 FBI did a
01:17:03.640 nationwide
01:17:04.080 crackdown this
01:17:05.080 year, and
01:17:06.420 they've got
01:17:06.980 8,000 arrests
01:17:08.400 in three months,
01:17:09.700 according to
01:17:10.340 just the
01:17:11.320 news.
01:17:12.720 Misty
01:17:13.180 Severi is
01:17:13.860 writing.
01:17:14.640 And I
01:17:15.020 wondered, is
01:17:15.620 that enough
01:17:16.020 that we would
01:17:16.520 see a
01:17:16.840 difference?
01:17:17.560 They seized
01:17:18.580 2,200 guns
01:17:19.820 and have
01:17:20.180 8,600 arrests
01:17:21.380 in three months.
01:17:22.900 Is 8,600
01:17:23.860 arrests of
01:17:24.760 presumably these
01:17:26.180 are some of
01:17:26.580 the worst of
01:17:27.140 the bad guys
01:17:27.820 because the
01:17:28.240 FBI was
01:17:28.880 involved?
01:17:30.220 Will we
01:17:30.600 notice that?
01:17:31.740 Is that
01:17:32.240 enough?
01:17:32.560 what, you
01:17:38.700 don't think
01:17:39.380 Israel is
01:17:40.020 pertinent to
01:17:40.720 the U.S.?
01:17:41.680 Somebody in
01:17:43.360 the comments
01:17:43.860 is saying,
01:17:44.480 it's
01:17:44.660 embarrassing
01:17:45.120 that I
01:17:45.600 can't find
01:17:46.240 U.S.
01:17:48.020 based stories
01:17:49.020 to talk
01:17:50.240 about.
01:17:51.020 You don't
01:17:51.620 think Israel
01:17:52.480 is a U.S.
01:17:53.120 based story?
01:17:54.260 I think
01:17:54.960 you're missing
01:17:55.360 a lot.
01:17:56.800 That's a U.S.
01:17:57.780 based story.
01:17:59.060 It's about as
01:17:59.820 U.S.
01:18:00.200 based as you
01:18:00.760 could get.
01:18:03.840 Anyway,
01:18:04.800 so let's
01:18:05.540 hope that's
01:18:06.060 a lot of
01:18:06.640 bad guys
01:18:07.120 that got
01:18:07.380 caught.
01:18:08.700 There's a
01:18:09.520 startup called
01:18:11.320 ARC.
01:18:12.420 They've got a
01:18:13.060 spaceship and
01:18:14.380 their plan is
01:18:15.160 to have their
01:18:15.580 spaceship,
01:18:16.580 their spaceships
01:18:17.960 orbiting the
01:18:19.500 Earth so
01:18:20.660 that they can
01:18:21.200 deliver what
01:18:22.020 you need
01:18:22.460 within an
01:18:22.960 hour to
01:18:23.480 any place,
01:18:24.740 primarily for
01:18:25.800 military stuff
01:18:26.760 at first.
01:18:29.560 I don't know
01:18:30.360 what kind
01:18:30.740 of stuff
01:18:31.200 you would
01:18:31.620 put in
01:18:31.980 space just
01:18:32.880 in case
01:18:33.300 you needed
01:18:33.740 it in a
01:18:34.340 military sense,
01:18:35.820 but it's
01:18:36.540 kind of an
01:18:36.920 interesting idea.
01:18:38.540 I don't know
01:18:39.100 what their
01:18:40.020 potential is on
01:18:41.020 that, but
01:18:41.600 it's kind of
01:18:42.000 interesting that
01:18:42.680 they would use
01:18:43.240 space as
01:18:44.120 their delivery
01:18:44.840 highway, I
01:18:47.720 guess.
01:18:50.640 All right.
01:18:53.060 MIT has
01:18:54.040 developed a
01:18:54.960 better concrete
01:18:56.560 battery, so I
01:18:58.040 guess they
01:18:58.420 can mix
01:18:58.980 some carbon
01:18:59.700 cement
01:19:00.260 supercapacitor
01:19:01.520 stuff into
01:19:02.160 your concrete
01:19:04.180 and you
01:19:05.520 could store
01:19:06.220 enough to
01:19:06.960 take care of
01:19:08.900 a house with
01:19:10.200 one wall of
01:19:11.740 concrete,
01:19:12.280 basically.
01:19:14.300 So that
01:19:15.140 would be
01:19:15.420 cool.
01:19:16.040 Imagine if
01:19:16.960 every house
01:19:18.400 could be built
01:19:19.160 with a concrete
01:19:20.500 basement and
01:19:21.980 the concrete
01:19:22.560 basement was a
01:19:23.720 perpetual battery,
01:19:25.300 like it would
01:19:25.680 never need to be
01:19:26.980 changed and it
01:19:28.500 would be enough
01:19:29.520 of a battery for
01:19:30.260 your whole house
01:19:30.880 and presumably
01:19:33.180 that would be a
01:19:34.080 safe battery.
01:19:35.020 I'm worried
01:19:35.400 about these
01:19:37.040 standard batteries
01:19:38.120 that you put on
01:19:39.620 the outside of
01:19:40.140 your house because
01:19:41.140 sometimes they
01:19:42.560 can catch on
01:19:43.200 fire, but I
01:19:44.340 can't imagine
01:19:45.240 concrete catching
01:19:46.320 on fire even
01:19:47.160 if it had some
01:19:48.080 electrical
01:19:50.180 qualities.
01:19:51.160 Maybe I'm
01:19:51.640 wrong, but it
01:19:52.980 seems like this
01:19:53.520 could have a lot
01:19:53.960 of potential.
01:19:56.240 Well, Taiwan
01:19:56.980 has rejected
01:19:57.700 the U.S.
01:19:58.380 proposal, CNBC
01:19:59.620 is saying,
01:20:01.180 that we
01:20:02.740 were going to
01:20:03.120 go 50, no,
01:20:04.680 we wanted
01:20:05.320 Taiwan to
01:20:06.480 make 50%
01:20:07.380 of their chips
01:20:07.920 in the U.S.
01:20:09.600 and they
01:20:10.320 said, no way,
01:20:11.500 so this is part
01:20:12.120 of the tariff
01:20:13.240 negotiations, I
01:20:14.240 guess, but the
01:20:15.540 idea was that
01:20:16.940 we would be
01:20:19.300 safer in terms
01:20:20.960 of our chip
01:20:21.520 supply if at
01:20:22.340 least some of
01:20:22.820 them remain in
01:20:23.360 the United
01:20:23.620 States, but
01:20:24.680 Taiwan says, no
01:20:25.800 way, and my
01:20:27.560 question is, what
01:20:29.100 leverage does
01:20:29.880 Taiwan have?
01:20:31.940 Doesn't Taiwan
01:20:32.720 need the U.S.
01:20:34.080 military to
01:20:34.720 protect them?
01:20:35.800 Can they really
01:20:36.440 say no to we
01:20:38.500 want you to make
01:20:39.120 50% of it in the
01:20:40.400 U.S.?
01:20:41.300 You know, not
01:20:41.760 right away, but
01:20:42.840 that would be the
01:20:43.780 plan.
01:20:45.280 I don't know.
01:20:46.140 Pretty gutsy of
01:20:47.180 Taiwan to
01:20:48.020 negotiate, but if
01:20:50.380 Trump gets tough,
01:20:51.880 he will literally
01:20:53.080 say, I'm going
01:20:53.760 to withdraw my
01:20:55.180 military support.
01:20:58.860 Now, I don't
01:20:59.420 think he can
01:21:00.300 because we can't
01:21:01.440 really risk losing
01:21:02.320 those chips, so
01:21:03.940 probably we can't
01:21:05.160 do that in reality,
01:21:06.380 but he could
01:21:06.840 certainly threaten
01:21:07.980 it, and that
01:21:09.620 should send them
01:21:10.680 into a tizzy.
01:21:13.360 Well, Trump is
01:21:14.560 floating the idea,
01:21:15.880 Just News is
01:21:16.640 reporting, of
01:21:17.900 doing rebate
01:21:19.200 checks based on
01:21:20.620 some but not
01:21:22.060 all the tariff
01:21:23.340 revenue coming
01:21:24.800 in.
01:21:25.420 He's thinking of
01:21:26.140 $1,000 to $2,000.
01:21:27.700 I'm generally
01:21:28.680 opposed to that
01:21:30.580 because I think
01:21:32.640 we should be
01:21:33.140 paying down the
01:21:33.840 debt instead,
01:21:35.180 but it would be
01:21:36.060 stimulative, and
01:21:37.240 things are so
01:21:38.880 tight at the
01:21:39.580 moment that it
01:21:40.860 probably would be
01:21:41.480 a godsend to
01:21:42.580 quite a few
01:21:43.220 families.
01:21:43.680 So, given
01:21:45.280 the bad
01:21:46.440 economic, the
01:21:48.260 tightness of
01:21:49.100 people's budgets
01:21:49.920 at the lower
01:21:50.800 income level, I'm
01:21:53.400 softening to
01:21:54.180 this.
01:21:55.740 It might be a
01:21:56.560 way to give
01:21:57.360 people just a
01:21:58.100 little bit of a
01:21:59.140 safety net without
01:22:00.740 doing too much.
01:22:03.380 It won't look
01:22:04.140 like it's a
01:22:04.660 budget buster, but
01:22:06.460 I wouldn't go
01:22:07.400 too big, but I
01:22:09.900 would say I'm
01:22:10.380 open to that
01:22:11.060 where I was
01:22:11.760 definitely not
01:22:12.460 open to it
01:22:13.060 before, but I'm
01:22:14.320 open to it
01:22:14.800 because the
01:22:15.520 budgets of
01:22:17.180 ordinary people
01:22:18.040 are just getting
01:22:18.780 worse just so
01:22:20.120 fast, and I
01:22:21.800 think we have to
01:22:22.280 do something.
01:22:23.420 You know,
01:22:23.680 otherwise people
01:22:24.360 are just literally
01:22:25.020 going to be
01:22:25.400 starving pretty
01:22:26.060 soon.
01:22:26.940 All right,
01:22:27.380 that's all I
01:22:27.800 got for you
01:22:28.400 today.
01:22:31.080 I'll try not
01:22:31.900 to fall down
01:22:32.500 any more stairs
01:22:33.220 today.
01:22:34.080 I promise I'll
01:22:34.840 use the elevator.
01:22:37.060 And thanks for
01:22:37.940 joining, everybody.
01:22:39.400 I'm going to say
01:22:39.980 a few words
01:22:40.460 privately to my
01:22:41.420 beloved,
01:22:42.460 subscribers on
01:22:43.840 Locals.
01:22:45.220 In 30 seconds,
01:22:46.320 I'll be private
01:22:46.980 with them and
01:22:47.660 the rest of you.
01:22:48.620 I always
01:22:49.220 appreciate you
01:22:49.940 coming.
01:23:12.460 .
01:23:19.660 .
01:23:20.220 .
01:23:20.840 .
01:23:20.880 .
01:23:21.000 .
01:23:21.760 .
01:23:29.860 .
01:23:31.300 .
01:23:32.280 .
01:23:32.380 .
01:23:33.020 .
01:23:33.280 .
01:23:33.960 Thank you.
01:24:03.960 Thank you.
01:24:33.960 Thank you.