Episode 2982 CWSA 10⧸08⧸25
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 37 minutes
Words per minute
148.49637
Harmful content
Misogyny
14
sentences flagged
Hate speech
23
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, we talk about a new 800-pound drug that could help ease chronic back pain, the dangers of driving under the influence of marijuana, and whether or not it should be legalized.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
like that you know it surprises me all right your stocks look like they're kind of flat
00:00:07.120
not much happening today so i guess we'll do a show how about that yeah it's a good idea
00:00:17.120
let me make sure i can see your comments here because that's what matters there we go
00:00:42.080
good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called
00:00:46.480
coffee with scott adams and you've never had a better time but if you'd like to take a chance
00:00:52.880
on elevating your experience up to levels that nobody can even understand with their tiny shiny
00:00:58.320
human brains all you need for that is a copper mug or a glass of tanker shells just time a canteen jug
00:01:05.120
or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for
00:01:13.120
the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine end of the day the thing that makes everything better it's
00:01:33.200
all right that was my last sip of the cup but boy was it good oh so good
00:01:41.520
well speaking of marijuana um mario naufel had some uh interesting posts that he surfaced on x the ap is
00:01:50.320
talking about this one there's new 800 pound 800 person not pound uh 800 person study found that
00:01:59.280
a cannabis-based drug slashed chronic lower back pain effectively with fewer side effects than opioids
00:02:07.920
do you believe that that uh thc the the active component of marijuana reduced back pain more than
00:02:18.080
opioids well you know who they could have asked me because i have lower back pain and i have taken
00:02:27.440
opioids on prescription of course uh and i have taken marijuana in large quantities
00:02:35.120
guess which one makes me feel better it's not even close it's not even close people the the first of
00:02:43.920
all the marijuana you can take as much as you want you know as long as long as you're not responsible for
00:02:50.160
work or driving or kids or anything like that but uh you can you could just sort of say that didn't make
00:02:57.040
a difference how about this until at the very least you're not caring about it as much which might be
00:03:03.920
the secret might not it might not be the pain maybe it's just the caring about the pain i don't know how
00:03:09.200
you divide that but uh next time ap you want a story that just ask me i can tell you meanwhile spain is
00:03:19.360
moving to legalize medical cannabis um it's not passed yet but i guess the council of ministers has
00:03:27.200
approved it and it's on its way to getting passed but over in germany they're going the opposite direction
00:03:33.920
so germany was one of the most liberal uh countries and they allowed uh i think total legal cannabis
00:03:43.120
including you could just buy it online now what they're trying to walk back is the buying it online
00:03:50.800
part i believe which uh i agree with i would agree with that as long as you can go to a dispensary and
00:03:59.040
show your id and as long as they have delivery service for people who need it for medical reasons
00:04:06.080
but are not well i mean i'm a perfect example if i needed more medical marijuana chances are i wouldn't
00:04:13.840
want to drive uh the driving because you know if you have a medical problem you might be on other drugs
00:04:21.280
that are bad for driving so delivery is pretty important delivery is very important for the medical
00:04:28.000
people very important it's critical really um so i think that's a good move by germany they tried it
00:04:36.240
the online part was problem so they're just walking back the problem part good on you germany for at
00:04:43.280
least being a rational player um then uh i guess sean duffy was on fox news the was it outnumbered or
00:04:56.400
something whatever it was this morning and sean duffy uh was uh he's the head of transportation right
00:05:05.760
and uh he said talking about legalizing marijuana he said quote i think it would be a huge mistake
00:05:12.720
for the federal government to legalize it now um here's my take
00:05:19.760
i think the argument his argument was that unlike alcohol where you can test somebody and find out if
00:05:28.320
they were driving drunk so you have something like a deterrent a legal deterrent which is good
00:05:37.200
you know you might still want alcohol to be illegal most people do but uh wouldn't you like a little bit
00:05:43.920
a deterrent against driving because that's deadly so that makes sense but you can't quite get that
00:05:51.440
deterrent with marijuana because people's individual responses are all over the place and there's no easy
00:05:58.320
way to test to find out if a person is um had too much for example somebody like me who's a lifelong
00:06:08.320
adult user um you could you could just pack me with marijuana before it would have any effect on even
00:06:17.600
sports i can play tennis with as much marijuana as you want now now obviously tennis is a very difficult
00:06:26.320
thing i don't recommend driving under marijuana by the way just to be clear i don't recommend driving
00:06:32.160
if you're under the influence don't drive but it's not true that everybody's going to have the same
00:06:38.320
amount of impairment so it makes it a problem for deciding whether you should go to jail are you really
00:06:43.920
high or are you still better driver than most people over the age of 60 just because you're not over the age
00:06:51.680
of 60 so you know it doesn't really work as a standard but i believe that's a terrible argument
00:06:58.000
um the good argument is that if you keep it illegal at a federal level that sends a better message to
00:07:08.080
teenagers everybody agrees with that right imagine arguing with your teenager who says uh you know
00:07:16.320
it's totally legal right not for teenagers under all conditions it won't be legal for teenagers
00:07:23.040
but it would be easier for them to argue hey i'm 17 you know i i can start making my own decisions
00:07:31.760
if it would be legal for me in two months after my birthday are you telling me that i can't make that
00:07:37.840
decision now two months before my birthday or whatever i don't know if it's 18 or 21 but as an argument
00:07:45.120
for keeping teenagers off it it really helps if you can say it's illegal on any level it just really
00:07:55.280
helps so from a parenting perspective believe it or not there might be some some real argument for
00:08:04.160
keeping it illegal at a federal level while at the same time the state police say we're gonna let it go
00:08:13.120
and maybe they would just you know turn the other way in terms of the federal charges
00:08:19.920
anyway so i think uh sean duffy could improve that argument a little bit um did you know that if jabba
00:08:29.040
the hutt had an evil twin that twin would probably be considered a front runner to be the next governor of
00:08:36.720
california and the only reason i say that is because the only thing we do that's dumber than what we're
00:08:42.800
doing and then i saw a video of somebody called katie porter who's apparently a front runner to be
0.98
00:08:52.320
the next democrat candidate for governor and uh you're gonna have to see the video of katie porter
00:08:59.840
talking to a reporter oh my god oh my god ah run away uh
00:09:11.120
i mean it's just all bad and you know that thing about overweight people being jolly
00:09:20.080
yeah she she looks like pritzker in a wig but so that pretty much guarantees that she'll be the
1.00
00:09:30.560
did you lock the front door check close the garage door yep installed window sensors smoke
00:09:38.240
sensors and hd cameras with night vision no i and you set up credit card transaction alerts
00:09:42.880
a secure vpn for a private connection and continuous monitoring for our personal info
00:09:46.480
on the dark web uh i'm looking into it stress less about security choose security solutions from
00:09:53.360
tell us for peace of mind at home and online visit telus.com total security to learn more conditions
00:09:59.840
apply anyway jd vance posted what they're saying is his first tick tock video as vp the hill is
00:10:10.640
reporting on this and uh here's what he said oh i want to just tell you what he said and i'll give
00:10:17.920
you my review of it he said quote now imagine him he's just standing full frontal from his knees up
00:10:28.400
standing in front of some official thing with some flags desk i think and here's what he says this is
00:10:34.480
his whole tick tock he says jd vance here just wanted to let you know that we are relaunching the
00:10:40.560
vp's tick tock page and then he said uh i got a little lazy the last few months i was focused on
00:10:47.360
the job of being vp not enough on tick tocks that's about to change so follow along you guys
00:10:56.400
we'll update y'all on what's going on in the white house the business of state we'll update you on
00:11:01.600
what's going on politically maybe some sombrero memes here and there but follow along and we'll
00:11:06.880
look forward to connecting on tick tock see them all right now here's what that doesn't sound like
00:11:13.760
much right doesn't sound like there's much meat to that tick tock but let me call your attention to
00:11:21.680
this what were the odds that a uh an elected member of our government any member of congress
00:11:30.960
just think of anybody except trump all right for this one for this one purpose imagine trump is not
00:11:39.120
part of the conversation he's the only one who's not part of the conversation look at all the other
00:11:44.640
politicians how many of them could have pulled this off none none there's not another politician that
00:11:52.880
could have done what he did he was playful he showed that he understood the tick tock kind of vibe
00:12:01.680
that if you're completely serious you're doing it wrong right if you're completely serious doing it
00:12:08.960
wrong but how well can a elected politician deliver some social media quality i'll say witticisms not not
00:12:20.320
outright jokes but just witticisms who can do that and the answer is nobody nobody jd vance can do it if you
00:12:30.000
don't realize how thin that target was he just hit a target that was the size of the arrow and he did it
00:12:38.720
effortlessly so he has just the right sensibility of when to mock something when to mock himself gently
00:12:48.800
you know without going too far in the self-deprecation i don't like the self-deprecation
00:12:52.880
um but if you're wondering who has the right stuff to be the next president boy would you miss this if
00:13:03.440
he didn't have it do you know how much you would miss having a president who could deliver a you know
00:13:10.080
i won't say a laugh line but at but at least uh oh that's pretty funny you know you you hit that target
00:13:20.400
all right i didn't love his so the suit he was wearing i thought was a mistake
00:13:25.200
so i'll give uh i'll give one negative uh if you're gonna do a full body
00:13:30.960
image i'd do a little more work on the suit he wears good suits just you know not that day
00:13:39.120
um i think he had uh yeah i'm i want to say more than that uh the trump administration is rumored
00:13:50.480
per forbes that they're thinking about maybe selling a portion of their gigantic
00:13:57.280
student loan debt to a private market why would they do that now what that means is uh people owe the
00:14:04.960
government i don't know uh 1.6 trillion dollars for student loan debt the way anybody who had who
00:14:13.600
owns the debt in other words the people who are supposed to be paid the way they can get rid of
00:14:19.200
that debt is by selling the debt to somebody else who's in that right kind of business so in other words
00:14:25.840
you say if you give us i'll just make up a number if you give us half a trillion dollars
00:14:31.680
we'll give you the ability to collect 1.6 trillion dollars from these people who used to owe us but
00:14:39.360
now they'll owe you because we sold it to you so they would have to deeply discount it for it to make sense
00:14:46.800
at all um but you have to keep in mind that a private entity probably can't be as successful
00:14:56.080
garnishing wages so so debt is worth more to the government than it is to private individuals
00:15:04.480
because the government can pretty much squeeze you until you pay private companies they can squeeze
00:15:10.480
you a lot they can mess with your credit etc but probably can't force you to pay it's a little bit
00:15:16.720
harder for a private entity so that makes the value of the debt lower because what they would be buying
00:15:22.800
would be worth lower and maybe private entities could be more aggressive in collecting maybe they
0.85
00:15:29.920
could be more innovative in how they handle the debt so there's something there i i wouldn't i wouldn't
00:15:37.520
say that this is necessarily a good idea uh you'd have to know the details it's all in the details but
00:15:43.840
maybe i mean it's within the realm of yeah maybe um eric dolan of psypost is writing about a study
00:15:54.400
they showed that public opinion shifts um your cardiovascular response during political talking
00:16:04.160
so in other words if they hook you up to sensors they can determine that some political topics make
00:16:10.720
your heart beat and your your hands sweaty and basically your body has a autonomic response now let me
00:16:20.480
ask you this what would be more useful in understanding the american public an opinion poll in which we
00:16:30.160
already know that 25 of the people asked are going to have the wrong answer because they do on every poll
00:16:35.440
and the other 75 didn't understand the question right that's that's what an opinion poll is the if you
00:16:44.960
say um can you uh give us your opinion on closing the government well people will have an opinion but do you think
00:16:52.960
they'll understand it uh that they want to close the border but do they understand all the ins and outs of
00:17:00.480
the policy you know the short term the long term not really so opinion polls are a good you know pretty
00:17:08.640
good gauge of what people are going to say you know if you talk to them they'll say those things and
00:17:15.760
that's a good gauge of that but what about how they feel that's what this uh cardiovascular response
00:17:23.120
is so this is not so much about this specific study making a more general statement that if you could
00:17:31.520
study how people feel like literally put sensors on their body so that they can't lie to you you're just
00:17:38.560
reading their body directly then you would suddenly know all the right policies not the logical policies
00:17:46.640
but you would know what you could sell now imagine and by the way i think that trump understands this
00:17:52.960
like nobody has ever understood it that's what it means to be able to read the room reading the room is
00:17:58.720
not listening to the words it's knowing how they feel that's what he does so if you look at the top three
00:18:07.200
issues for voters often it'll be stuff like crime and uh the border and inflation of course but that's
00:18:17.680
that affects everybody but don't you think that those are the same things that would show up on an
00:18:23.680
automatic or what time what is it uh your cardiovascular and your other responses if i hook you up to
00:18:31.600
something and you're having a tough time paying your bills and then i say how do you feel about
00:18:38.640
inflation it doesn't matter what words come out of your mouth if if as soon as you hear inflation you
00:18:45.200
think i can't pay my bills oh my god what am i gonna do and your body starts going crazy now you really
00:18:51.120
know something i mean you really really know something and likewise with the border if you show
00:18:57.840
somebody pictures of you know uh non-citizens streaming over the border and say how do you feel
00:19:03.680
about that i don't want to hear what words they use that would be a little bit interesting but not
00:19:10.880
really but if you tell me that if they see that picture of their heartbeat goes oh my god i'm under
00:19:17.200
attack which you might for some people it might feel like an attack it does feel like an attack it does
00:19:23.840
um don't you think that opinion polls should at least be augmented by a smaller number of people
00:19:34.400
checking people's automatic responses so you know my friend uh carmen simon who's uh in that line of
00:19:46.240
and that line of business means testing people's you know bodily responses to to different questions she
0.53
00:19:52.640
doesn't do politics but because uh you know i'm very familiar with her work by the way you should
00:19:59.120
follow her on locals carmen simon dr carmen simon so she's usually doing you know corporate questions
00:20:07.840
and things like that you know if we do this versus that how do you feel one of the things i learned
00:20:12.880
years years ago when i worked in the user interface lab at pacific belt now i was not one of the
00:20:20.800
scientists working on testing people but we were in the same small group so sometimes i'd get to sit
00:20:28.640
in the room behind the you know behind the glass and watch somebody being tested so i learned i learned
00:20:34.800
a lot about that process and the most surprising thing i learned is if you're testing whether people
00:20:40.080
can use a user interface what what do you think is the right number of people to test
00:20:46.480
let's compare that to an opinion poll where i don't know what the number is but you probably want a
00:20:52.640
thousand people would you feel comfortable if you talk to a thousand people that would be a pretty
00:20:59.280
good opinion poll i think nationally but if you're testing people for a user interface how many do you have
00:21:05.280
to test do you have to test a thousand nope five maybe one because if that person says ah i'm looking all
00:21:18.560
over this page and i don't see a button and then you bring in the next person and they say ah i i don't
00:21:26.160
see i don't even see the button and then you bring in the third fourth and fifth and they all say
00:21:31.200
uh i i don't know where the button is you don't have to wonder if those five people are coincidentally
00:21:39.440
messed up and they're the only ones who can't use your user interface you have guaranteed that it's
00:21:45.760
unusable four out of five three out of five guarantees it's unusable you have to redo it so if you're looking
00:21:54.080
at how people feel and this is maybe the analogy is not perfect i realize that but if you look at
00:22:02.000
how people feel we're way more similar in how we feel than in how we talk so if you get an opinion
00:22:12.320
poll people will be talking in all different ways but the way they feel about it might just be one of
00:22:19.440
two ways it either bothers you or doesn't bother you and that would be i mean that would just be
00:22:25.120
amazing if you do that on every topic i think that's uh trump's superpower is that you can feel
00:22:37.760
all right uh there was a nobel prize awarded to uh the first mainland chinese scientist and also a woman
00:22:46.880
i think that's worth noting for china and uh she discovered uh artemisinin malaria cure oh wow
00:22:56.000
she saved millions of lives with the malaria cure damn that's pretty impressive but uh um instead of
1.00
00:23:04.560
being impressed by the science i'm going to impress you with a joke that somebody told about this topic
00:23:10.800
this is one of the best jokes i've ever seen and uh it's by um abobo naduki who may or may not be a
00:23:22.240
real person i can't tell online but uh you have to listen to this joke so the article says that her name
00:23:29.920
is two you you two you and uh she won the nobel prize now this of course is a you know a great honor
00:23:39.520
uh you know we should be showing her maximum respect so her name is spelled two the first name is just
0.95
00:23:47.680
tu and then the last name is just the word you put together twice you you y-o-u y-o-u and here's the joke
00:23:56.640
from mabogo also she is the most difficult person to sing happy birthday to
00:24:13.280
come on i think it adds i think that joke had 16 million views when i checked this morning
00:24:18.880
that's a quality joke that's a quality joke that's a that's a nobel prize joke right there
00:24:27.600
i hate that the joke overshadowed her accomplishment of quote saving millions of lives
00:24:35.760
but yeah saving millions of lives that's cool too that's cool too but are we overlooking
00:24:41.440
the quality of this joke come on people let's be fair
00:24:48.240
you want to hear the least surprising news of the day the news is all weird and funny and uh
00:24:59.920
the today show will be the best you ever saw um so remember i always say that all data is fake
00:25:08.480
if it matters if it doesn't matter you know maybe it's maybe it's not fake but if it matters there's
00:25:15.040
somebody whose job it is to make sure that you don't see the real the real stuff there's always
00:25:20.000
somebody's job to make sure you don't see accurate data yeah it used to be my job when i worked for a big
00:25:27.840
corporation my job was to make sure people didn't see accurate data
00:25:31.680
and you know you don't think about that you don't think of it that way at first
00:25:38.560
but you you soon realize you know that we say hey i don't have good data for this branch bank or
00:25:44.800
whatever that i was monitoring so we should just leave out the data because we don't really have
00:25:49.600
data for this one bank and the boss would say no just make something up and just put it in there
00:25:55.120
because i don't use the data anyway i just use it if it agrees with me he actually told me that um so
00:26:02.880
so given that context that all data is fake if it matters what do you think of the census data
00:26:14.080
what would matter more than census data maybe just the national elections but census data is
00:26:20.800
right up there right do you what what else would be like way toward the top of importance of data
00:26:28.560
how about jobs data how about those jobs the jobs data we recently learned that was just totally made up
00:26:39.840
one of one of the uh by far oh actually i'm not high i read i'm not high at all i will be after the show um
00:26:50.880
just it's worth mentioning that opinion i think the news is just genuinely funny today
00:26:57.440
and i've been sort of laughing all day but on top of that uh i won't give you the long story but the
00:27:04.000
short story is this is the first pain-free day i've had since last december so if you think i'm high on
00:27:13.120
life oh god i am i didn't know that i could ever feel pain-free again now it won't last
00:27:20.720
that's also a longer story it's probably just today but i have
00:27:26.960
rarely felt better than i feel right now rarely my whole life because you know you feel better
00:27:33.040
if you're coming off of something bad there's nothing the best meal i ever had in my life
00:27:39.520
was after a week of dental work where i could only eat soft food and the first time i had like a piece
00:27:45.280
some pasta i thought oh my god oh what is this it's like god in my mouth so that's how i'm feeling
00:27:53.600
right now so if i do seem unusually happy you're right but not for marijuana and i don't drink so
00:28:02.480
it's not it's not those two things anyway back to the census bureau if we know that all data is fake
00:28:08.800
if it matters and the census matters more than just about anything would you be surprised that
00:28:14.320
there's a group called center for renewing america whose claim is that the census is not just flawed
00:28:27.520
intentionally flawed and i was thinking to myself hmm how are they going to convince me of that
00:28:34.240
because you know everything's political and you can't trust you can't really trust some you know
00:28:39.600
entity you've never heard of suddenly making a you know big provocative claim you know you want to
00:28:45.840
you want to keep your powder dry maybe see if anybody else is saying the same thing listen to the
00:28:50.800
argument hear both sides well they didn't have to do that uh apparently the census bureau according to
00:28:59.200
the center for renewing america has a quote secretive algorithm that only a handful of bureaucrats have
00:29:06.640
access to and it's called differential privacy to scramble block level data hide citizenship status
00:29:20.720
okay you had me at secretive algorithm oh but let us tell you more about why we know this
00:29:29.200
data is not accurate nope stop stop did you not just say secret algorithm
00:29:36.640
yes we did that's just the beginning of our argument stop stop take the rest of the day off
00:29:43.120
if you tell me that any part of the census has a secret algorithm we're done here
00:29:51.280
we're done here the census is bullshit i don't know how much bullshit but it's definitely
0.76
00:29:58.800
bullshit how about those temperature calculations for climate change huh huh do you think that they
00:30:07.520
replaced all the thermometers that went out of service or were close to uh heat islands in other
00:30:13.840
words too close to things like airports that would heat them up too much no they use their secretive
00:30:20.800
algorithm to s to estimate what the temperature would be if they had measured it
00:30:30.000
so the climate change and apparently the census have always been complete bullshits
00:30:40.160
i've always been so that was fun now i know there's going to be another side to this story and the
00:30:47.760
census people will say no no that's not true but i'll tell you there's nothing more persuasive to
00:30:55.440
me than somebody says they got a secret algorithm no other questions i have no other questions after i
00:31:02.640
hear that phrase how about obamacare do you think that the data about obamacare is pretty good
00:31:12.240
pretty clean the people who put it into uh put it into law they had a good idea what was going to
00:31:18.960
happen and they weren't surprised at all because things went just the way they estimated it would
00:31:24.560
obamacare what do you think well according to economist stephen moore uh the real he posted an
00:31:32.400
x the real problem is that obamacare was never actually affordable so apparently the washington post
00:31:39.280
just uh according to steven just admitted what conservatives have been saying for 15 years
00:31:46.480
quote this is from the washington post the real problem is that obamacare was never actually
00:31:51.520
affordable thank you jeff bezos you know you wonder if jeff bezos was at all serious
00:31:59.920
about making the at least the opinion part of the newspaper um closer to something that would show
00:32:07.040
both sides or at least close to the middle or something i would say this is one of the best
00:32:12.320
examples of him succeeding in that in that narrow aim that i've seen can you believe that the washington
00:32:20.320
post you know the big the biggest one of the biggest supporters of the democrats would say this
00:32:26.480
directly the problem was it was never a good idea economically and that by the way is the best
00:32:33.360
reframe for obamacare here's the worst reframe you cheap miserable psychotic bastards want to cut that
0.91
00:32:42.880
obamacare and take away all the affordable health care for people what kind of monsters are you that
00:32:50.080
would be the current frame not so good here's a better one the people who implemented it knew it
00:32:57.440
would fail because it was never affordable and now we're just paying the cost of those people who lied
00:33:03.360
to you for low those many years that is completely true that the people who implemented it lied to you
00:33:12.960
about what it would cost and uh they've been lying since then and that it was never affordable it's
00:33:20.000
it's not a question of um are you willing to pay more that that's what it feels like are you willing
00:33:27.760
to pay more it's not really that it was unaffordable by its nature on day one and wasn't going to get
00:33:36.800
better now i have complimented obama for the way he implemented it flawed because he said out loud and i
00:33:47.440
appreciated the transparency at the time at the time he said there are lots of problems with obamacare
00:33:53.120
he didn't call it that but he said uh if we don't get something in there we won't have anything to
00:34:00.080
correct i'm i'm paraphrasing that's not his exact words but did he did say directly that he would
00:34:07.040
prefer to implement a flawed plan and then the the markets try to adjust and you know get the price
00:34:16.080
down etc so that wasn't the worst idea in the world uh except that under i think it underappreciated
00:34:24.720
how incompetent congress is if we had a competent congress that operated let's say like a startup or
00:34:32.080
like a private industry then you could implement something bad let's call it the original iphone
00:34:39.280
the original iphone was a piece of garbage i mean it was just garbage but it was also apple computer
00:34:47.600
so by putting the first one out there they they created a market amazingly against all odds and then
00:34:53.840
they could work on it every year and then it could become an amazing an amazing piece of technology so
00:34:59.360
it's not that unusual for a private entity to do what obama did implement the flawed version and that's
00:35:07.840
the fastest way you get it fixed by you know raising its visibility so but it didn't work it didn't
00:35:15.680
work the government is not capable of doing what apple is capable of doing which is fast fixing things
00:35:22.080
that are broken once something becomes a you know law or somebody in congress is making money at it or
00:35:29.120
you know their cronies are overcharging obamacare and all the other things that happen
0.95
00:35:34.160
can't really fix it can't really fix it so what is trump doing he's breaking it without having a solution
00:35:43.680
does that make sense does it make sense to break it if you don't have a good replacement people depend
00:35:50.960
on it he's just going to break it well probably it does make sense because again the government is
00:35:58.960
not apple computer keeping it flawed and fixing it would be great if we were apple computer but
00:36:06.320
sometimes you just have to break it you gotta you gotta shake the box and it's going to cause all kinds
00:36:13.280
of problems in the short run do you know who has balls big enough to create all kinds of problems in
00:36:20.480
the short run because it's the only way to get to where we need to get affordable health care trump
00:36:26.880
somebody who doesn't need to run again if you were running for president again might change how
00:36:34.560
he approached it but he's got the balls he's got the mandate he's got the second term he's got the
00:36:40.880
right people he can break this thing and the faster we can figure out some way to fix it because fixing it
00:36:48.880
is the goal the goal is not breaking it the the goal is not just taking away those you know tax burdens
00:36:56.400
the goal is to have a better health care he doesn't have that yet but boy can he shake a box
00:37:04.240
however there are some good things happening in health care that we'll talk about in a minute
00:37:09.840
bernie sanders uh according to bright bar news is reporting on that he was in an interview recently and he said
00:37:15.680
uh um the democrats will quote quote lose our leverage if they vote to resume the pay of air traffic
00:37:25.360
controllers and service members so talk about tone deaf when when the government uh is shut down who is
00:37:36.960
suffering it's people who are at the lowest economic rung it's uh ordinary you know air
0.97
00:37:45.520
traffic controllers and of course service people that's the most the most grotesque part of this is
00:37:52.400
if service people are effective i mean that's just grotesque but to refer to it as losing our leverage
00:38:02.160
talk about not being able to read a room do you know how much we care about democrat leverage
00:38:09.360
when you can't pay your effing bills if you can't pay your bills you just hate their guts from top to
0.70
00:38:18.000
bottom and you probably don't even care who it was that that you know blocked the uh the payments you
00:38:25.360
just freaking hate their freaking guts you imagine looking into your bank account and the money isn't there
00:38:31.840
and and and you know who it is it's bernie and then bernie says we don't want to lose our leverage
00:38:38.720
well fuck you and your leverage bernie why don't you take your leverage and shove it so far up your
0.99
00:38:44.080
fucking crinkled ass that it comes out your ears fuck you and your leverage by the way it's not like i
0.99
00:38:52.160
disagree with them i'm not disagreeing with the point i'm just saying if you do this to people and then you
00:38:59.280
say out loud it's for your fucking leverage you better fix that that is such a messaging mistake
0.95
00:39:08.880
imagine this clown being your president this is the opposite of reading a room right how can you read
00:39:16.320
a room worse than this oh what we need is some massive socialism and don't want to give up our
00:39:22.160
leverage should certainly don't want to be paying those people in the military fuck you
0.68
00:39:26.240
you fuck you and your leverage all right according to rasmussen poll um 49 uh of the people who were
0.94
00:39:43.840
polled say uh the democrats did the closing of the government for the benefit of illegal aliens nearly half
00:39:51.840
half of voters agree with a top trump administration figure on the reason for the current government
00:39:58.480
shut down 49 so about half say that the democrats shut it down to give free health care to illegal aliens
00:40:08.640
so is the free health care to illegal aliens the reason the government is shut down
1.00
00:40:15.840
well there's some of the reason but but the trump administration is totally dominating the the
00:40:26.480
messaging and they have made people argue whether or not they're uh you know helping to pay illegal
00:40:33.760
aliens i'm not even going to get into that argument it would be easy to argue that's not exactly
00:40:41.520
technically what's going on but it would be equally easy to argue that well although it's not technically
00:40:49.440
what's going on it's exactly what's going on but i can see why technically you think it's not
00:40:56.880
but it's exactly what's going on and a lot of has to do with who you call illegal if you're here on amnesty
00:41:03.040
is it illegal and then there's a question of if the hospitals are going to treat you either way
00:41:08.320
what's different the hospital is still going to treat you uh but i guess you just wouldn't have
00:41:16.160
the emergency room would still treat you but uh you wouldn't have regular health care which of course would be
00:41:25.280
so uh messaging wise i'd have to give the wind so far to trump all right here's a story about uh gel man
00:41:35.280
amnesia do all of you know that now i talk about it so much that most of my audience should recognize
00:41:41.520
that gel man amnesia quickly uh gel man was a physicist who realized that when he read the paper
00:41:49.680
and saw a story on his expertise physics he always knew the story was fake news but but as soon as he turned
00:41:58.320
the page to let's say politics he would read it like it was probably true and one day he thought uh
00:42:06.880
i feel like i might be noticing a pattern here that whenever i know the truth of the story
00:42:12.880
the news is fake but whenever i don't know the truth behind the story i just uncritically assume
00:42:18.960
they got that one right and so he concluded that probably all the news is fake
00:42:25.200
would you like to see a real world example of gel man amnesia now one of the benefits i think i think
00:42:35.520
bill maher said exactly the same thing i'm gonna say paraphrasing that if you're a public figure
00:42:41.920
you live gel man amnesia all day long which is when you read stories about yourself or about something
00:42:48.800
you're an expert on you know it's fake news so if you're a celebrity you've seen the fake news
00:42:55.040
about yourself over and over and over and over and over again to the point where if you saw news about
00:43:01.600
at least another celebrity you would say probably not probably there's context missing etc so there
00:43:09.440
was a story about me uh yesterday so there's an entity called the bulwark the bulwark so that's a
00:43:17.840
publication i didn't realize that it wasn't just a democrat publication apparently they're anti-trumpers
00:43:26.800
and uh one of the one of the principles there is uh tim miller who i did not realize
00:43:34.640
that before he was an anti-trumper he was uh jeb bush's
00:44:00.560
was jeb bush's communications director oh poor guy let me summarize jeb bush's
00:44:14.560
uh i'm gonna do a fast forward of jeb bush's speeches and things he said blah blah blah blah blah blah
00:44:22.560
blah blah blah blah fast forward blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah and then
00:44:27.360
that would go on for you know hundreds of hours now let me quote uh donald trump totally ending the
00:44:36.320
career of jeb bush with these words jeb bush is so low energy and we're done imagine imagine
00:44:54.960
director and having your entire campaign taken out with one sentence
00:45:06.400
now i'm i'm making fun of tim miller only because of the unfortunate career arc
00:45:21.760
when he was on msnbc and the the shows i'm all primed to dislike i wondered why he always seemed like
00:45:28.720
a reasonable guy even though he'd be a little anti-trump i think well he's not crazy like a lot of the people that msnbc
00:45:37.280
he has on are just just batshit crazy but he didn't seem crazy
00:45:44.880
how could this you know rational person who has a different opinion but he's a rational person how
00:45:52.000
like how is he part of the democrats and now i learned
00:45:54.880
that uh i think he's maybe a recent uh i don't know independent maybe i don't know what he is but he's no longer a republican
00:46:03.200
he's an anti-trumper so he was on with bill crystal and they were showing a video of me
00:46:20.960
how many people think that they showed the full context of my comments
00:46:26.320
do you think that taking it out of context completely reversed
00:46:33.200
or at least you know maximally changed what i was saying
00:46:40.400
and do you think that you would have necessarily noticed
00:46:44.400
if you had not also had the pleasure of listening to me say it originally
00:46:49.120
and then seeing what they did to it would you have noticed
00:46:51.760
it was there any way you could tell that contacts had been removed no but i could tell
00:46:59.840
i could tell so this is gel man amnesia i knew what they left out but you didn't unless you watched
00:47:07.680
me a lot of you watch me so here's what they uh what they included they included me um
00:47:16.000
um talking about how uh trump was uh in my opinion he was authoritarian and a strong man
00:47:27.360
and uh what i meant by that is that he he pushes every envelope he he kicks every door he does
00:47:37.520
everything that he can get done executive orders he pushes around israel if he can he's a bully
0.87
00:47:44.400
and my argument was if you know your perfect form of government would be exactly that guy
00:47:52.640
now here's the parts i left out that i would never support him for a third term
00:47:58.160
because the system would break down so if you don't leave the part where it's completely impractical
00:48:05.200
to have any kind of a policy of you know trying to have or supporting an authoritarian
00:48:11.040
strongman strongman you're completely missing the philosophical uh brilliance of my point the point
00:48:18.800
is not that we should try to get that or that the next one should be that or that we should be glad we
00:48:24.560
have it i'm just saying we do have it and it works great so i'm not going to complain about something we
00:48:32.720
do have and it works great but trump is such a unique character that uh that you're not gonna there's no
00:48:43.600
there's no hope you're gonna get a second one right it's not like you say oh let's try to get another
00:48:50.160
one who's who's that ballsy and that strong well good luck good luck with that you know it's sort of a
00:48:58.560
one-off and so i reposted it and said you know i'd never support it but what's funny is i don't know
00:49:05.600
a single person who seriously thinks trump should or would do a third term do any of you i'm curious
00:49:16.560
there always be there's always gonna be some troll who says yes but seriously how many of you you're the
00:49:22.560
this is probably one of the most trump supporting audiences in the whole world how many of you think
00:49:28.320
it would be a good idea for the united states no matter how much you love trump how many think it
00:49:33.840
would be a good idea at his age especially to to break the entire system by running again
00:49:41.440
all right look at the comments yeah no no no no no no so why does trump keep teasing it is he just
00:49:51.360
testing the water uh it feels like it sometimes but far more obvious than that is that he's trolling
00:50:00.080
them so every minute that uh tim and bill spend showing videos of me talking about trump maybe maybe
00:50:10.560
being a dictator oh they conflated it they conflated my saying that having the the strong man might be
00:50:17.520
actually good for you they conflated that with me wanting him to have a third term which is the
00:50:23.280
opposite of my opinion right so when you conflate something with its opposite you're not doing anything
00:50:30.720
useful for anybody you're you're just making some content so all of the time that they spent making
00:50:38.000
that video and talking about it followed by all the time that maybe they have to deal with the fact that
00:50:44.320
now they're getting some blowback is all wasted anti-trump time because we don't care we don't
00:50:53.120
care that these two guys honestly believe that trump might want to serve a third term when there's no
00:50:58.640
way that's ever going to happen and then somebody tried to challenge me online and they said all right
00:51:05.040
all right yeah this is paraphrasing too i go all right so so scott uh if you don't think you should have
00:51:11.440
a third term are you going to agree that if he tries to have a third term you're going to fight it
00:51:17.920
and i guess they thought that was a gotcha to which i said yes yes that's exactly what i would do
00:51:25.760
if he tried to have a third term seriously and there's nothing like that happening there's nothing
00:51:31.280
like that happening but if it did happen oh yeah yeah i'd be standing on top of a building screaming
00:51:38.160
do not let this happen because that would be the end of the constitution the end of the whole
00:51:43.040
you know american experiment no no way but do i like it that he trolls them and makes them suck up
00:51:50.880
all their time not talking about anything useful okay i kind of love that kind of love it
00:51:55.920
uh alan walton who's one of the commenters in the comment thread on that topic and he said uh talking
00:52:06.160
about me he said that i said 10 seconds after the clip ended that they would have major problems if
00:52:11.680
trump ran for a third term now if i may defend uh tim miller and bill well tim miller mostly if i may
00:52:21.520
defend him probably somebody sent him the clip probably somebody sent him the clip i doubt he
00:52:29.120
watched the entire clip and then decided to you know leave out the most critical part why because he
00:52:37.200
used to be a republican and like i said he presents himself as a rational person even if i disagree with
00:52:45.360
his views they seem rational and so i don't believe that you know if i'm a reasonably good judge of
00:52:54.240
character do i think that bill crystal would have intentionally left out the clarifier yes i do yes i do
00:53:03.120
i think bill crystal would have intentionally left out the clarifier so that he could do that creepy smile
00:53:09.520
you know that creepy bill crystal smile yeah yeah i think he's gonna he's gonna be hitler and take over
00:53:18.880
um but do i think that tim miller who used to be jeb bush's guy jeb bush also a perfectly reasonable
00:53:26.560
person low energy no just kidding um i don't think he would have personally been okay with clipping off the
00:53:36.080
most important part of the clip i think somebody said it to him and maybe somebody trusted and you
00:53:41.600
went with it we all do that by the way how many times have i shown the clip and then somebody said uh
00:53:48.320
that was from six years ago scott and i go you know and then i slink way to delete it so if you're in
00:53:57.440
this business you make that mistake a lot um and i don't i don't really judge it you know i i'm okay
00:54:06.240
as long as it's done on a platform where the comments can you know add the context it's not
00:54:12.960
a perfect world right it's not a perfect world so i'm not going to say tim miller should never
00:54:18.400
make a mistake on a clip i'm not going to say that i make that same mistake twice a day
00:54:23.920
uh but as long as it can be corrected thank you elon musk with amex platinum access to exclusive
00:54:31.520
amex pre-sale tickets can score you a spot track side so being a fan for life turns into the trip
00:54:37.280
of a lifetime that's the powerful backing of amex pre-sale tickets for future events subject to
00:54:42.400
availability and vary by race terms and conditions apply learn more at amex.ca and then uh commenter
00:54:50.720
ozarky patrick parish said also in that uh in that thread he said trump is so authoritarian that
00:54:58.720
he can't just open the government up on his authoritarian order but he just he's just
00:55:03.600
authoritarian enough to serve a third term got it right he can't pass a budget by himself he can't
00:55:12.080
put um he can't put the national guard into a city by himself he has to obey the courts and is
00:55:20.000
you know if you wanted to make the argument that he's not an authoritarian you have all you have
00:55:27.440
you have a lot of argument um i use i use the term authoritarian a little different maybe than most
00:55:34.800
people i think when some people say authoritarian they say oh he's doing things for his own benefit
00:55:45.600
the definition is that the authoritarian has a strong focus on authority what's another word for
00:55:55.200
authority the constitution what's another word for authority the law the law what's another word for
00:56:06.640
authority uh head of the military defending the border so when i see a authoritarian
00:56:15.600
i see somebody who's willing to uh kick every door push every envelope but but if the court says
00:56:24.800
too far he says all right well we'll try something else that's exactly the kind of strong man authoritarian
00:56:32.720
i want i want obey the law obey the constitution you know don't take away my second amendment
00:56:40.320
is that authoritarian because he's certainly strongly backing authority but unless he runs for a third term
00:56:51.920
it's not about him it's really not about him all right
00:56:59.200
um i finally decided to follow a little bit this story about the eight senators whose phone records
00:57:05.040
were monitored not their conversations but the actual who they called and when and how long they talked
00:57:10.960
as part of jack smith's so-called arctic frost investigation so i guess when january 6th was still
00:57:19.120
buzzing jack smith was trying to figure out if trump had planned the insurrection and was he talking to
00:57:26.080
anybody that they could further investigate to find out if there had been conversations about an actual
00:57:31.920
insurrection there had not do you do you think that by now that if there had been any evidence
00:57:39.920
that an insurrection had been planned on january 6th do you think we wouldn't have heard that by now
00:57:46.480
seriously none not a single conversation by anybody who mattered that they were planning an insurrection
00:57:54.880
none not a single one and it is still and how many people were charged with the crime of insurrection
00:58:03.600
none none nobody nobody was even uh what's the word indicted you know how you can get the supreme
00:58:12.880
court to indict a ham sandwich right nobody was even indicted nobody's admitted it there's been no
00:58:20.560
document there's been no whistleblower there's not even been a conversation with any normal person who
00:58:27.200
attended january 6th to say hey do you have a minute could you tell me what your intention was
00:58:34.800
how many of them said our intention is to overthrow the election and put in trump illegally
00:58:40.960
not a single person had that intention well you know it's a big crowd there might have been some
00:58:45.360
crazies there but the general crowd believed that the election had just been stolen right in front of
00:58:51.600
them and were there to make sure there was time to check out their suspicions that's it but anyway
00:58:59.680
during the time back in the day uh jack smith was trying to figure out if he if trump had been talking
00:59:06.960
to anybody that they should find out more information about and that included people like lindsey graham
00:59:13.600
uh josh holey and uh ron johnson and some others that you'd be less familiar with but let me tell you
00:59:22.400
this if you if if what you're doing democrats is pissing off lindsey graham josh holey and uh ron johnson
0.52
00:59:35.840
you you you you got trouble coming those three guys don't take shit you know maybe the other ones
0.90
00:59:43.840
too i just don't i'm less familiar with the other but those three guys no they don't take any shit
0.89
00:59:50.080
so so the blowback is going to be pretty fierce and uh and so far lindsey graham has let them have it in public
00:59:56.960
and we only just found this out now legal experts are defending it um because they
01:00:06.400
legally got subpoenas and they stayed within the bounds of the law
01:00:14.160
is that enough i don't know um but they you know eventually the case was dropped but only because
01:00:21.040
trump became president so i'm gonna say that maybe that's not a technical violation of law but boy does
01:00:30.160
it sound bad all right let's talk about health care wall street journal is writing a story about
01:00:37.920
don jr being uh recently put on the board i think in february of a uh company that's trying to sell
01:00:44.720
um pharmaceutical meds mostly mostly but say mostly focusing on generics directly to customers and don
01:00:55.440
john don jr and others are going to be meeting with big pharma people sometime soon and trying to get
01:01:02.240
that all right so uh it's called blink rx and uh they would be competing with uh mark cuban's company
01:01:14.400
that does a similar but there are some differences called cost plus drugs
01:01:21.120
now i went to grok i spent a lot of time on grok today because all the stories needed more context than
01:01:27.120
i can find in the news but uh i wanted to ask you what's the difference between this uh cost plus drugs
01:01:33.840
that mark cuban's already rolled out and blink rx that is in some state of being rolled out i don't know
01:01:40.160
how much wall street journal is writing about that uh in both cases you uh depending on the drug
01:01:48.000
it's not every drug but uh both of them have a emphasis on generics because those are places
01:01:54.720
you can save some money but um apparently uh apparently you can save money on uh even some
01:02:06.560
drugs that have insured copays so in the case of mark cuban's company cost plus drugs um they can
01:02:13.920
sometimes even beat the copay not not just the cost of the drug but if you have insurance and there's
01:02:22.800
a copay they can sometimes beat the entire cost of the copay i don't know how often that happens but
01:02:28.880
that'd be damn impressive anyway um so my point is that they both seem to be in the in the market
01:02:40.000
for cutting out the middleman so that big pharma doesn't have to go through these middleman entities
01:02:46.240
that have you know big big markups etc um so awesome good news so here's some good news
01:02:57.600
the good news is these are serious companies you know one has the clout to bring in all the big
01:03:03.840
pharma ceos and the other one is mark cuban who has all the clout in the world and they're going to be
01:03:11.600
it looks like competing against each other now um i i don't know enough about either company to know
01:03:20.000
what the competitive you know matchup would be yeah but i would encourage you to look into it
01:03:26.160
and it turns out that there's a tool for allowing you to find the low cost way to get your drug and
01:03:33.520
i believe that tool would include both mark cuban's company cost plus drugs as well as this blink rx
01:03:42.960
that don jr is getting involved with so uh the tool is called and there are other ones like it i don't
01:03:49.440
know what they're but good rx so it's all one word good rx so google that if you're looking for a
01:03:58.640
cheaper place to get your drugs especially the generics so the good news is very capable people
01:04:05.680
are competing on a very important topic see this is why we need billionaires do you ever say to
01:04:14.240
yourself uh i wish we could you know get rid of all those billionaires who are distorting the system
01:04:22.000
if you didn't have a billionaire we wouldn't be going to mars we wouldn't have an electric car we
01:04:26.080
wouldn't have a neural link and we wouldn't have a cost plus drugs and we probably wouldn't have a
01:04:30.800
uh whatever this other one is right this is all billionaire stuff you know i i felt a little bit
01:04:40.560
of this when i got a little bit rich you know i'm nowhere near billionaire status of course but even
01:04:46.080
just getting a little bit rich you you automatically feel this weight to do something for the world like
01:04:53.760
payback right so you so that's why i did the dill burrito i tried to make a food that was more nutritious
01:05:00.080
that's why i do a lot of things but um imagine being a billionaire like imagine the pressure you
01:05:06.800
would feel if you didn't feel like you were doing enough for the world and i believe that this is
01:05:13.840
very much drive some of our best innovations i know you can have some complaints about bill gates
01:05:19.520
there's something more complicated going on there and i don't know what it is
01:05:23.360
but if you're looking at you know who is it who's taking the stab at lowering our pharma costs
01:05:30.640
it's some rich people it's rich people anyway rand paul has introduced his own budget reduction plan
01:05:40.480
for the government he wants to cut six cents from every dollar the government spends and he says if
01:05:47.280
we did that we could balance the budget in five years now here's what i like about this first of all i like
01:05:54.960
ran paul in general uh i just love that he's part of congress and i love that he's a noisy part of
01:06:01.520
congress don't always agree with him but that's not really the test the test is not whether i always
01:06:08.720
agree with him the test is is he additive he is additive as hell uh even when he doesn't get his
01:06:15.360
way he always extends the argument he makes you think about it a little bit more clearly he always
01:06:21.520
adds some context and he seems to be always on the side of the public it seems like it i mean i can't read
01:06:30.160
his mind maybe everybody has his secret evil thoughts or something but doesn't look like it
01:06:36.400
it looks like he's literally just on our side now would this work um well he'll never get congress
01:06:43.200
to act on it because we don't have a congress that can do smart hard things they can do smart things
01:06:50.320
sometimes uh they can do hard things other times but they can't seem to put the two of them together
01:06:58.880
that they need to do something that's smart but also hard you know otherwise
01:07:05.120
if they could do that the budget would already be balanced but it's by design they're unable to do
01:07:11.200
that because they will lose their jobs as soon as somebody said well let's do something good for the
01:07:15.920
public uh you know we hate it but we're gonna have to cut these prices or cut these uh expenses they
01:07:23.120
get fired they wouldn't get re-elected so we have a system that by its design can't solve problems that
01:07:30.400
are both smart and hard that's why you need a billionaire occasionally because they can do that
01:07:35.840
what can elon musk do that the government can't do he can solve a problem that's smart and hard
01:07:41.600
and we're watching him do it every day anyway um here's what i love about the way rand paul presented
01:07:50.720
this instead of saying six percent which sometimes could sound like a lot depending on the domain
01:07:59.120
six percent would be a lot if you if you lost six percent in the stock market it'd feel like a lot
01:08:05.360
if you had to pay six percent interest rate on a mortgage it would feel like a lot
01:08:12.480
but what if it's six cents six cents remember i always tell you that if somebody tells you the
01:08:19.840
dollar amount without the percentage or the percentage without the dollar amount it's always
01:08:26.160
propaganda it's at least persuasion so because i like rand paul i'm not going to call this propaganda
01:08:32.560
i'll call it persuasion it's kind of clever to call it a six cents doesn't that sound like less
01:08:39.280
less six percent feels like it reminds you of other six percent things that would be too expensive
01:08:48.640
but if somebody said uh uh here you can buy this item whatever it is it wouldn't matter if it's a
01:08:53.840
piece of candy or an automobile if they said it's six cents you would say oh you mean like nothing
01:09:05.760
so it's a very clever way to um to put it i don't think you'll get support in congress
01:09:10.880
all right did i tell you that today's news is all fun okay if you haven't seen pam bondy
01:09:22.000
testifying before congress i guess yesterday and responding to adam schiff and then to richard blumenthal
01:09:29.840
do yourself a treat now i don't know that this is true i'm going to add a little speculation here
01:09:39.280
but i think it's true it looks to me like the top administration people have decided that if they
01:09:46.000
have to testify in front of uh pencil neck adam schiff that they're not going to be take any of it
01:09:52.960
seriously and they're going to spend the entire time that schiff has insulting him personally and
01:09:59.120
never stopping never answering the question just insulting him personally while it's on cnn and msnbc
01:10:07.840
until he runs out of time and pam bondy did that to both adam schiff and then a little bit less
01:10:15.600
but also some to richard blumenthal and i thought to myself as long as she's only doing it
01:10:22.720
to the designated liars you know your swall wells your shifts your your raskins you know and i think
01:10:30.320
i'd throw blumenthal on there too as long as she's only doing it to the bad players please do more of
0.99
01:10:37.040
this i i want to see this all day long i want cnn to say you know we're not even going to bother
01:10:43.520
covering it because all it is going to be is pam bondy screaming insults over adam schiff begging for
1.00
01:10:52.160
to get his time back i loved it i i did not think that there would be any meaningful way you could
01:11:01.360
respond to being sat in front of the tv cameras and then allowing the politician to say i demand my time
01:11:09.760
back so i can insult you is it true that you ran over a child well no i didn't it's my time it's my time
01:11:16.720
but i didn't really run over a child shut up it's my time it's my time and then just say a bunch more
01:11:23.680
bullshit i can't put up with that for another minute but watching pam bondy literally just sitting there
1.00
01:11:31.760
trying to think of new insults and then yelling your insults so you couldn't ignore them oh my god i
01:11:39.360
loved it i loved it it's like it's it's like uh scott jennings on uh on steroids or something
01:11:48.880
you know how much we like scott jennings because he always has that you know calm measured you know
01:11:56.000
well thought out response to the craziness but see but seeing somebody who is a smart you know thinking
01:12:04.400
person you know high level executive very serious made it to the you know highest levels of government
01:12:11.200
seeing that person realize that the situation itself is so absurd that the funniest thing she can do is
01:12:19.520
just insult him to his face on tv for as long as she can get away with it a plus pam bondy i've never
01:12:27.920
loved you more that was just a plus more please i don't know if anybody else will be able to match
01:12:35.680
that that was just really good work well the illinois uh it looks like oh texas national guard has arrived
01:12:47.280
in a training camp i guess in illinois and they will be deployed soon but again the news is all funny
01:12:55.600
so there's a photograph abc ran it on on axe of the uh supposed texas national guard troops getting off
01:13:04.000
a truck in illinois and if you haven't seen the picture you really have to because they're all
01:13:09.840
they're all obese now i don't know if all national guard people in texas are obese but there were like
01:13:18.400
six of them in the front of the picture who were clearly obese you know all decked out in their
01:13:23.920
their military outfits and uh i just thought to myself uh paging p hegseth p hegseth uh could you
01:13:33.440
show up and maybe uh lead some lead some jumping jacks i can't believe that that picture got released
01:13:44.080
they look so not ready for war but luckily it's not a war
01:13:49.120
anyway um all right let me talk about uh the persuasion view on uh all the sending the national
01:14:00.560
garden to cities all right so there are two ways to look at this so that there are definitely two sides
01:14:06.560
of this on one hand it does look quote authoritarian for the federal government to be sending in troops to
01:14:15.120
cities would you agree now i mean you don't have to you don't have to disagree with sending the troops
01:14:22.640
i'm just asking you a very narrow question would you not agree that if the democrats are trying to
01:14:28.160
create this authoritarian rap on trump they're sending uh uniformed officers and especially people with
01:14:36.720
masks on and stuff it plays it plays into their um into their model right now that doesn't mean you
01:14:44.560
shouldn't do it don't get me wrong doesn't mean you shouldn't do it but i often refer to trump as what
01:14:51.440
i call an against the president meaning that damn he's getting stuff done but he's gonna leave a little
0.54
01:14:59.520
breakage because it's usually the only way he can get anything done so this is in the category of a
01:15:06.160
little bit of breakage because it gives them something to focus on oh the authoritarian authoritarian
01:15:12.240
and it works a little bit i would say it works i would say they've convinced their base
01:15:20.400
quite a bit of it that oh this is authoritarian it's the next step before hitler comes in right
01:15:26.800
so on one hand uh it supports their fake messaging about authoritarian and it also supports their fake
01:15:34.800
paid protests which apparently are going to happen today so you'll see some more fake
01:15:40.160
paid performers uh protesting so that all fits into the democrat model a little bit and if there was
01:15:48.320
nothing else to say it would look like democrats are winning on this topic wing politically
01:15:56.240
but let me give you the other side which is more with less obvious
01:16:00.400
less so the the less obvious part is the fun part so on the pro trump side of this argument persuasion
01:16:08.640
wise the imagery um is telling us that democrat leaders have left you to die have left you to die
01:16:18.240
at the hands of criminals and cartel members and the only person who's trying to save your freaking life
01:16:24.880
is trump with the national guard so trump has the um the strong imagery of sending in the the cavalry
01:16:37.200
sending in the rescue squad so if he can frame this successfully and it sounds you know based on
01:16:43.600
rasmussen it sounds like he has he if he can frame this as saving the the poor downtrodden especially low
01:16:51.680
income and almost always minority population if he can say i'm sending these people in to save you
01:17:00.000
because your leaders have left you to die at the hands of criminals and cartels let me say that sentence
01:17:07.680
again i'm sending in the the national guard because your local leaders have left you to die
01:17:14.400
at the hands of the criminals and the cartels now is that exactly true have they left you to die well
01:17:22.240
no i mean they have police and it's certainly not their intention for you to die but feel how strong that is
01:17:32.640
your leaders are leaving you to die i'm sending somebody to save your life
01:17:37.520
do you feel that now remember i was mentioning earlier dr carmen simon and her and her experiments
01:17:46.800
where she can put sensors on your body and find out how you're responding to different messages
01:17:52.880
how do you think you would respond to that message your leaders are leaving you to die
01:17:58.560
at the hands of criminals and cartels i'm sending in the military to stop them
01:18:04.320
i feel like that's just a dead winner i shouldn't say dead but um i believe that trump has once again
01:18:16.000
correctly read the room i believe that when people answer polls they answer it with words
01:18:24.800
in other words they they've got a point of view that matches their team and that's been put into words
01:18:30.560
by other people and then if you're asked your opinion you'll look at the words and you'll you'll say
01:18:36.400
what words do i have that you know is the answer to that opinion but you'll be you'll be dealing on
01:18:41.120
the word level also known as the policy level the word level trump is dealing on the stay alive level stay
01:18:52.160
live live don't be stabbed by a bad guy are those similar do you think the people who are dealing
01:19:03.120
on the word level even though those words do play through into polls which would make it look like it's
01:19:09.920
a closer a closer debate than it really is on the visceral physical level
01:19:16.880
well this is a blowout it's an absolute blowout but it won't be until after it works that 80 percent
01:19:28.080
of the country will see it was a blowout but you can't beat i'm going to keep you alive
01:19:36.160
you can't beat that how do you beat that and by the way it's close enough to true because everybody
01:19:43.680
feels that you know the impact of crime everybody feels it um so it hits exactly what you're thinking
01:19:51.040
and feeling in the strongest possible way uh so i think uh trump's got the uh the leverage as we say
01:20:00.640
here's something else trump said being funny uh he was talking to uh carney from canada and uh
01:20:09.680
uh separately he said that democrats have no leader they remind me of somalia okay that's just so
01:20:16.480
perfect they remind me of somalia how am i not going to quote that i mean seriously democrats have
01:20:25.360
no leader they remind me of somalia if you take out the somalia part would i quote it no of course i
01:20:32.720
wouldn't it would just be sort of an ordinary statement you know i say it you say it we all say they
01:20:38.640
don't have a leader the news says it wouldn't be anything but as soon as he adds they reminded me
01:20:44.000
of somalia part of your brain goes and then it like it burrows in and it uh persuasion wise it
01:20:55.840
becomes an association that you can't lose will i ever forget ever for the rest of my life will i ever
01:21:04.320
forget that trump compared the democrats with no leaders to somalia oh i won't forget that for the
01:21:11.680
rest of my life well the rest of my life might not be that long but uh the rest of you you might
01:21:17.360
remember it too and then he had another witticism you had to see this one to see uh how well he pulled
01:21:25.600
it off but that uh so mark carney is sitting in that uh official chair that the leaders always sit
01:21:32.320
in next to the president you know so the two of them are facing out on these chairs fox news is
01:21:38.640
reporting on this um so mark carney is talking and then the the part that's hard to explain unless you
01:21:45.600
see the video which is worth seeing uh is that trump interrupted them all right so it's it's hard to tell
01:21:51.600
a story with an interruption in it but he interrupted uh and so mark carney who starts out by saying uh
01:21:58.800
this is in many respects the most important trump interrupts him and he finishes his sentence with
01:22:09.840
so carney laughed like genuinely laughs and you know he said no no not that the uh the people attending
01:22:19.760
all laughed they all laughed and you know how people always say that trump never laughs he was
01:22:27.120
totally laughing like he doesn't do ha ha ha you know he doesn't laugh like i do but he was laughing
01:22:35.040
he had a smile wrapped around his face he knew he pulled it off so yeah he was happy i'm sure but
01:22:42.240
uh um i don't know if i told you this story but it reminds me of uh of a joke i'd heard from jared
01:22:52.640
and i wondered i wondered if there's any influence there that that with jokes there are only about a hundred
01:22:59.440
jokes in the world and everything else is just changed in the names of the people in the joke
01:23:04.560
so it makes me wonder if uh if trump had exposed this i may have told this story before but i'll tell
01:23:11.040
it again so in 2018 when i was invited to meet with trump just because it was summer and he was
01:23:17.680
he was in meeting with some supporters and nothing important and i was waiting in the outer the waiting
01:23:23.840
area to be allowed into the oval office and uh jared comes walking by through the outer office on the
01:23:30.640
way to work and uh he was with another gentleman and i guess he recognized me from i don't know
01:23:37.440
probably the podcast and so he so he makes a point to stop and introduce himself and but of course he
01:23:45.600
introduces the person that he's with as well uh so he introduces himself and he says this is so and so
01:23:51.920
he's the finance minister of mexico and he's here to pay for the wall now the finance minister belly
01:24:00.160
laughs jared laughs i belly laugh because it was a great line like the the humor depends not just how
01:24:09.600
clever you are but where you say it and in front of whom if you do the right joke in the right audience
01:24:18.000
in the right time it's magic and that that was kind of magic it was just brilliant but does that remind
01:24:24.560
you of uh a little bit of uh trump's joke to to try to infer that uh you know your your other party from
01:24:34.640
the other country is totally on board but you're just joking about it now is trump also serious about
01:24:44.560
the possibility of merging with canada i say yes i would say yes it's not the worst idea in the world
01:24:51.520
uh i think it would be hugely difficult and it would be you know it would come with its own risks and
01:25:14.160
um but i think that turning that into a joke and then turning his relationship with
01:25:22.000
from very contentious into two dudes joking is brilliant it's one of the things that
01:25:30.400
trump does better than anybody if you are doing what he likes he's going to go at you as hard as
01:25:36.240
anybody can go i talk about this all the time it's great persuasion if you don't do what he likes he
01:25:41.360
goes after you hard you if you're at the moment doing things he likes and i guess he was getting along
01:25:48.240
with canada at the moment you know he makes a joke he slaps him on the leg they have a laugh now he's
01:25:54.080
his best friend and and he he praised carney like more than more than i've seen him praise other people
01:26:01.840
i mean he genuinely he genuinely seems to respect carney's you know judgment and and skill so that's all
01:26:11.280
good news for us and canada we'll see where that goes meanwhile over in hungary they're passing a
01:26:18.880
lifetime tax exemption to mothers of three so if you have three kids you just don't pay taxes
01:26:25.760
no what do you think of that idea is there anything missing in that story what is it that's
01:26:32.800
obviously missing in this story and i had to go to grok to get the context
01:26:39.280
well the obvious thing that's missing is what is the base tax rate in hungary to begin with
01:26:47.680
if the tax rate was one percent it's nothing if the tax rate was like america you know up to 50 percent
01:26:58.080
oh my god i mean that would be gigantic policy turns out that hungary according to grok uh their tax rate
01:27:06.880
is uh 15 for just everything income investments just 15 15 so it's a lot easier to go from one five
01:27:20.880
down to zero for a special class of people mothers who are adding to the economy that's a lot easier than
1.00
01:27:29.120
going from rich people paying 50 percent um to well we'll let you get away with none how about none you
01:27:36.000
just have an extra kid do you do you know how fast i would have three children if it meant i paid no
01:27:42.480
taxes it would take me uh nine months if i could pay no taxes in the united states because remember
01:27:53.200
i pay half of my income in taxes if i can take that to zero i could find three women wait
1.00
01:28:02.560
no it wouldn't work with three women you'd have to have one woman with three babies okay it would take
01:28:09.040
me 27 months plus a little uh recovery time well yeah i i would have i would have three kids i didn't
01:28:18.640
plan on having to save a gigantic amount of money yeah as long as i didn't have to be too active in the
01:28:25.600
raising of them i'm not good at that um and i won't last long but you know lots of reasons
01:28:35.840
all right uh i know i'm going super long do you mind i can go a little bit longer okay
01:28:44.880
i'm having so much fun today you don't have to listen to it all
01:28:47.680
all right uh there was some rumors about charlie kirk sending some text messages that were kind of
01:28:54.720
negative on his view of how much bullying he was getting from pro-israel sources some people didn't
01:29:03.520
think that was necessarily a real text and might have been fake but apparently that's been confirmed
01:29:09.520
that it's real so one of the tp usa guys guys i think confirmed it so candace owens had it and here's
01:29:18.480
what the message said um so charlie kirk said in the message i think it was a group message
01:29:27.440
um just lost another huge jewish donor two million a year because we won't cancel tucker
1.00
01:29:33.120
uh for the tp usa event and then he says uh i'm thinking of inviting candace now those are connected
01:29:43.840
thoughts because uh both tucker and candace are accused of being uh anti-israel so if he got
01:29:53.600
if he lost two million dollars because he won't cancel tucker yeah it looks like he was going to double
01:29:59.120
down and invite candace and sort of a big f you to the people bullying him so then one some other
1.00
01:30:06.880
member uh didn't like that i guess and then charlie went on to explain uh jewish donors play into all
01:30:16.720
the stereotypes okay that's probably something you don't want to say in public um and then it says i
01:30:23.840
cannot and will not be bullied like this now let me explain he's not saying all jewish people are like
01:30:32.880
the stereotypes he's saying that the jewish donors the ones he's dealing with are acting like the worst
01:30:41.200
stereotypes i probably wouldn't have said that that that feels like a little unnecessarily provocative
01:30:49.760
but also probably completely accurate meaning that he dealt with these donors i didn't i have no reason
01:30:56.880
to think he's a liar so if he says my honest my honest reaction to this is why are you acting like the
01:31:03.040
worst stereotypes and i'm i'm out seems fair um and then he says quote leaving me no choice but to leave the
01:31:21.520
wow so now the accusations um which i do not believe let me let me say it front and then i'll say it one
01:31:31.200
more one one more time when i'm done i don't think israel put a hit on charlie kirk i do not think
01:31:39.840
there's any chance that israel put on a hit on charlie kirk there was a reason
0.93
01:31:47.520
they had a good reason because if charlie kirk turned against israel he did have enough clout in
01:31:55.600
the united states and the united states is vital i believe israel would say to their survival
01:32:01.920
they would feel an existential threat by the fact that he said directly i'm going to leave the pro-israel
01:32:09.040
cause did they had did israel have a an incentive to murder him yes yes let me say it again i do not
01:32:20.880
believe israel had anything to do with killing him here's why the bigger existential threat would
1.00
01:32:28.640
be caught doing it and we always catch everybody we're in a world where you kind of do catch
01:32:35.200
everybody if you care enough do you think that netanyahu as smart as he is strategically and even
01:32:42.240
if you hate him even if you think he's a monster he is a genius like actual like the literal kind of
01:32:50.320
genius strategically genius um again i don't agree with everything he does that's not the point but
01:32:58.960
do you think somebody as smart as netanyahu would take any chance of permanently ruining the u.s as an
01:33:07.440
ally and and i think the chance would be at the very least 25 percent like even if even if mosad came
01:33:17.360
to him and said look we got a plan to take out this critic and it's really important to israel that we
01:33:23.680
do take him out but um i think we can get the risk down to 25 percent of getting caught you think he'd
01:33:31.360
take that nope nope not a smart person no smart person in the world would take that how about and
01:33:39.760
especially let's add to the fact that they knew each other they knew each other how hard is it to do a
01:33:45.680
hit on somebody you know personally that's got to be pretty hard i mean you have to be pretty cold
01:33:51.120
to do that i'm sure leaders do it but it's pretty tough so if you look at it from the point of view
01:33:58.400
that netanyahu is not a moron there's no chance that they there's no chance that he would have greenlit
01:34:04.960
this and there's no chance that massad would have done it on their own so i'm going to say again
01:34:11.440
there's no chance in my opinion that israel was involved in a hit on a beloved american person
01:34:20.880
who if they got caught even one or two percent chance of getting caught is the end of israel
01:34:28.960
i mean that wouldn't just be a hard week i mean that could very well be the end of israel
01:34:36.000
um if they pissed us off that much and got caught i mean it's not like we don't have contentious
01:34:45.120
things and they spy on us i'm sure we spy on them they they try to bully us we try to bully them back
01:34:52.240
i mean that uh that stuff seems more like normal countries you know pursuing what's good for their
01:34:58.960
country i don't hate all that it's more like the the give and take you expect but if they had if they
01:35:06.000
had and they didn't in my opinion they didn't but if they had biggest mistake israel would have ever
0.74
01:35:13.600
made in its entire history bar none so no i don't think they would do that well and finally an update
01:35:21.120
on the what i call the robot energy war you call it the ukraine russia war but it's really now robots
01:35:27.680
fighting energy resources and allegedly now this is according to pravda so we can't automatically
01:35:36.080
trust it but they say that a ukrainian drone hit a cooling tower a nuclear power plant cooling tower
01:35:42.400
in the in the city of nova nova rosa i think i nailed it nova rosa rosa rosa
01:35:53.840
so so put a hole in the cooling tower but we don't see any
01:35:59.120
bad stuff escaping yet but it might do you think that uh
01:36:06.000
do you think that ukraine would attack a cooling tower on a nuclear i feel like that would be
01:36:12.080
a mistake because if they if they declare open war on nuclear facilities in russia
01:36:19.680
russia is going to take out all the nuclear facilities in ukraine
0.96
01:36:24.640
but if they take out the energy resources the other energy resources like oil and gas
01:36:30.320
they might be able to take out enough of that that russia gets flexible about peace
01:36:35.920
before they've destroyed 100 of the energy in ukraine so maybe that's the bet i don't know so
01:36:43.120
it feels like there's at least some possibility that was a mistake or maybe fake news could be
01:36:49.520
fake news but it also could just be a mistake it'd be a weird mistake i mean hard to imagine it would
01:36:56.400
be a mistake all right that's all i have for today um i'm not going to say anything to the locals
01:37:02.400
people today i got a had a good chat with them before the show um so i'm just going to end
01:37:07.120
because we ran late thank you everybody for staying so long i hope you had as much fun as i did this is
01:37:13.920
one of the most fun i've ever had doing the uh podcast and uh we'll see you again tomorrow same