Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 01, 2020


Episode 805 Scott Adams: The #Unpeachment, Coronavirus, Bernie Surging, Our New Dictator


Episode Stats

Length

58 minutes

Words per Minute

151.45494

Word Count

8,817

Sentence Count

301

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Today's guest is Chris Silliza, who writes for CNN and writes about Marco Rubio. In this episode, Scott Adams criticizes one of the most powerful man in the world's most powerful presidency: President Donald J. Trump.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, come on in. It's good to see you. I'm so glad you could make it this morning.
00:00:14.060 Today is going to be one of the best coffees with Scott Adams since, I don't know, since yesterday.
00:00:21.020 It's been a long time, but this one will be off the hook, coming in hot.
00:00:27.580 We're going to have some fun today. Now, for those of you who are new to this, let me give you a little preview.
00:00:39.120 We're going to talk about fun stuff first, and then toward the end, I'm going to give you one of the deepest criticisms of this president's persuasion skills you've ever seen from me.
00:00:52.340 So you're going to see the biggest criticism, I think, probably the biggest criticism I've ever made, of President Trump's persuasion skills, specifically.
00:01:02.600 All right, but before we get to that, and before we get to all the fun stuff first, I know why you're here, and it's probably for the simultaneous sip, and you don't need much.
00:01:13.160 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, like my coffee.
00:01:23.680 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:01:28.980 The simultaneous sip. Go.
00:01:31.200 You know, in all this talk about impeachment, I think we tend to look at the negative too much.
00:01:48.860 Let us just take a moment to look at the positive side of the impeachment process that we've just been watching and continue to watch.
00:01:57.780 Here's the positive side.
00:01:59.220 If you didn't have this impeachment, the only time you could enjoy Trump winning is on election days.
00:02:08.420 So Trump actually found a way to win in between elections.
00:02:13.560 Not bad.
00:02:14.960 After he wins this next election, and maybe even before that, I think he'll have a few more opportunities to win impeachments.
00:02:22.180 All the smart people are saying that they're just going to keep on going because they don't know what else to do.
00:02:29.400 They're sort of running out of attacks, wouldn't you say?
00:02:32.940 And let's give me, here's an update on one of the prediction filters I often talk about.
00:02:42.640 I told you to watch the impeachment process play out.
00:02:46.160 And one of the filters for prediction is that politics will go in the direction that would make the best movie script.
00:02:55.700 In other words, the thing that has the most mystery and twists and turns and intrigue and interest.
00:03:00.440 Now, that would have been probably calling witnesses.
00:03:05.300 But it's also entirely possible that the witnesses would have had absolutely nothing to add to the process, which would have been a boring movie.
00:03:12.940 But still, I thought that the movie filter predicted that we would get witnesses, and we did not.
00:03:19.220 So if you're keeping score, and this is a good thing to do, if you have a filter or predicting method, it's kind of useless.
00:03:28.400 Now, I'll go further.
00:03:29.640 It is useless unless you also track how well it does historically.
00:03:34.680 Because if you don't track it, you're going to forget when it doesn't work, and you're going to think it works more than it does.
00:03:40.700 So the movie filter did not predict the next step in the impeachment.
00:03:45.720 So just keep that in mind when you're keeping score.
00:03:47.560 Now, remember I told you that there was going to be this weird thing happening where the Democrats would simply misinterpret what's happening and then complain about the misinterpretation.
00:04:03.320 And that would be all we'd be watching, is them misreading what somebody said, misquoting somebody, putting words in somebody else's mouth,
00:04:13.840 and then criticizing the thing that they just literally hallucinated.
00:04:18.420 Here's one of the best examples you're ever going to see.
00:04:21.620 Now, sometimes you think to yourself, well, that's sort of a subjective thing, Scott, isn't it?
00:04:27.020 No, no.
00:04:28.600 It's not a subjective thing.
00:04:30.880 I'm going to give you an example from today.
00:04:33.060 It's fresh off the press.
00:04:35.420 You tell me if I'm being subjective, okay?
00:04:38.560 You're never going to see a better example of this.
00:04:40.860 So this is Chris Silliza, who writes for and appears on CNN, and he wrote in an opinion piece today, and it was about Marco Rubio.
00:04:51.820 And he was talking about Marco Rubio's what he would call, what Chris Silliza would call, sort of a twisted and knots explanation of why he voted the way he did to not have witnesses.
00:05:04.180 And so this is what Chris Silliza says, just picking up the part where he's mocking Rubio.
00:05:13.640 And Silliza says, and more broadly, how can anyone read, much less write?
00:05:18.560 All right, so Chris Silliza is saying, how can anybody else read this differently than I'm going to explain it?
00:05:26.320 I think you might.
00:05:28.060 But he's saying, how could you?
00:05:30.660 How could anybody read, or much less write, this sentence and think that it all makes sense?
00:05:36.980 All right, so Rubio said, and I quote,
00:05:39.600 just because actions meet a standard of impeachment does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a president.
00:05:46.480 So Rubio is saying that there could be a situation where something technically meets the standard of impeachment,
00:05:54.300 but it's just not really good for the country.
00:05:56.960 That's a pretty simple concept, right?
00:05:59.380 Now, you can certainly say you should never do that.
00:06:02.900 That would be a reasonable thing to say.
00:06:05.100 You should say, I can't think of any examples where that would be true.
00:06:09.600 That would be a reasonable thing to say.
00:06:11.540 You could say, maybe, you know, maybe we should rethink that.
00:06:14.460 There are a lot of things you could say about that.
00:06:16.480 But here's what Chris Silliza says about it, right?
00:06:19.420 And you have to see Silliza's misstatement of it really close to the original to see what he's doing.
00:06:27.280 So I have to read the original again just so you see it in close proximity.
00:06:32.080 So what Marco Rubio did say was this.
00:06:35.180 Just because the actions meet a standard of impeachment does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a president from office.
00:06:42.580 So Silliza's comment to this is, huh?
00:06:46.520 Question mark.
00:06:48.160 So remember what I told you about the word so?
00:06:52.080 The word so in this context almost always, very close to 100% of the time,
00:06:59.100 signals that what follows the word so is a complete misstatement of what somebody else said.
00:07:06.700 So let's see if this is a complete misstatement following the word so.
00:07:12.180 So, Trump has done things that meet the standard of impeachment.
00:07:17.420 No.
00:07:18.680 No, that wasn't in Rubio's statement.
00:07:21.520 Rubio said that it was a hypothetical.
00:07:25.300 Just because this happens doesn't mean you have to do this.
00:07:27.820 But I do think that was a reasonable inference.
00:07:31.780 So, so far, I would say Silliza is making an inference that isn't in the sentence,
00:07:37.720 but it's not unreasonable.
00:07:39.500 It's pretty reasonable.
00:07:40.400 So, so far, okay.
00:07:41.760 All right.
00:07:42.600 Good inference.
00:07:44.620 But, and this is what Silliza is putting into Rubio's mouth,
00:07:50.340 but impeaching him for committing impeachable acts would be bad for our partisan divide.
00:07:58.260 Am I reading that right?
00:08:00.660 No, Chris, you're not reading that right.
00:08:04.240 There's nothing in Rubio's statement that said anything about healing our partisan divide.
00:08:10.740 It's not there.
00:08:12.480 It's absolutely hallucinated.
00:08:15.780 Let me read Rubio's sentence again, and then, this is amazing.
00:08:20.340 That anybody could do this in public and not be aware of what they're doing.
00:08:24.100 So, Rubio did say, just because actions meet a standard for impeachment
00:08:28.160 does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a president.
00:08:33.640 Silliza interprets that as,
00:08:35.960 you're saying removing him for impeachable acts would be bad for our partisan divide?
00:08:46.300 Where is partisan divide in that sentence?
00:08:48.320 This is crazy stuff.
00:08:51.520 Anyway, so, so look for how often you see a misstatement after the word so, you'll be amazed.
00:08:57.720 I wrote about that in my book, Behind Me, The So Tell.
00:09:03.260 Where is it?
00:09:03.820 This one.
00:09:04.800 Win Bigley.
00:09:05.300 All right.
00:09:07.520 Now, of course, we're waiting till Wednesday for the actual vote that everybody knows what the vote is going to be.
00:09:14.980 So, you say to yourself, why are we waiting till Wednesday?
00:09:18.960 Now, the explanation given is that it gives time for all the senators to make a statement.
00:09:24.640 Is that why?
00:09:25.440 Can senators not make statements after votes?
00:09:30.960 What's the reasoning that says the senators have to make the statement before the vote?
00:09:35.620 They can't make a statement after a vote because nobody would pay attention?
00:09:39.920 It's sort of sketchy, isn't it?
00:09:41.400 Who exactly is explaining to the public why we're waiting for something when we know what's going to happen?
00:09:47.820 There's no mystery.
00:09:48.860 Everybody was already there.
00:09:50.640 Why didn't you just get it done?
00:09:51.820 Here's a rule that I'm going to reinforce as often as I need to.
00:09:58.440 When your government does something that you don't understand on its surface,
00:10:04.160 and they know you don't understand it on its surface because it's something you can't really understand,
00:10:10.600 and they don't explain it to you in a way that makes any sense at all,
00:10:15.860 or at least is good for the country,
00:10:18.360 it's something corrupt is happening.
00:10:20.860 All right.
00:10:21.000 So something corrupt is happening.
00:10:24.480 So I've seen in the comments that somebody's saying it's to get it on the record.
00:10:28.900 Yeah, I suppose that would get the speeches on the record.
00:10:32.640 That's pretty useful, right?
00:10:34.540 Because when I go back and read the record, oh, that's right.
00:10:38.040 I'm never going to read the record.
00:10:40.100 Who reads the record?
00:10:41.840 Why does it matter if a senator said something on the record or if they tweeted about it,
00:10:48.740 which is sort of on the record?
00:10:50.240 No, you can make an argument for why they have to wait until Wednesday or why they should or could or want to,
00:10:57.620 but it doesn't pass the sniff test, does it?
00:11:01.160 Let me ask you this.
00:11:04.100 What's the argument that it's good for you?
00:11:08.000 If your argument is, well, it's good for the senators because then the senators get to go on the record
00:11:12.700 and they'll get more attention if they do it before the vote, okay, I get that.
00:11:17.440 But how's that good for you?
00:11:18.900 In this case, I'm saying you, a citizen of the United States.
00:11:24.480 I know many of you are coming in from other countries.
00:11:27.680 But if your government right in front of you is doing something that can only be good for them,
00:11:34.600 wait a minute, wait a minute.
00:11:37.380 Are the Democrats delaying this vote because it's only good for them politically
00:11:44.360 and it's not good for the interest of the country?
00:11:49.680 What is it that we do in those cases
00:11:51.940 when it's obvious that something is done for political reasons
00:11:57.960 that is bad for the country because it's delaying our ability to get something done,
00:12:04.740 good for the politicians' re-election, but it's bad for the country?
00:12:09.040 What do we call that?
00:12:10.640 Is there a name for that?
00:12:12.360 Oh, yeah, that's right, right.
00:12:13.920 Impeachable offense.
00:12:15.420 That's right.
00:12:16.740 It's an impeachable offense.
00:12:19.660 I'd like to see witnesses.
00:12:21.560 I think we should call some witnesses
00:12:23.440 to find out why the Democrats are insisting
00:12:26.540 to delay this vote and damage the country
00:12:30.900 by being more inefficient
00:12:32.680 and diverting us from real, real important stuff.
00:12:36.660 It feels impeachable to me.
00:12:38.800 Unless I miss the entire point of the Xi impeachment.
00:12:43.300 That's how it works, right?
00:12:44.500 When you do something that's only good for politics
00:12:47.060 and it's bad for the country
00:12:49.200 and it's obvious,
00:12:51.780 I mean, it's obvious, right?
00:12:53.440 Give me one argument
00:12:54.560 why waiting till Wednesday is good for the country.
00:12:57.260 Go.
00:12:58.540 None.
00:12:59.860 There are only arguments
00:13:00.960 why it's good for the politicians.
00:13:02.900 That is impeachable,
00:13:06.060 according to what we've learned.
00:13:09.060 All right, I don't mean that literally,
00:13:10.560 but you know what I mean.
00:13:13.200 So, remember,
00:13:15.220 if abuse of power is a standard for impeachment,
00:13:18.600 what in the world did we just watch?
00:13:21.440 Did we not watch a massive exercise
00:13:25.060 of the House totally abusing its power?
00:13:31.200 I mean, this is what we just watched.
00:13:33.540 Let me see if anything I say about this
00:13:35.480 strikes you as not true.
00:13:37.180 There was a sham impeachment
00:13:40.800 for purely political reasons.
00:13:42.780 We know that because they explicitly started planning
00:13:46.720 as soon as the president was elected
00:13:48.400 or sworn in, I guess.
00:13:50.300 And they didn't care what the reason was.
00:13:54.480 And I think that's, you know,
00:13:56.160 Molly Hemingway reported
00:13:57.480 that she actually overheard Madler
00:13:59.560 talking about impeachment
00:14:00.640 before they had even considered reasons.
00:14:03.500 All right, so I think it's fair to say,
00:14:06.720 since those facts are not in dispute,
00:14:09.880 I think it's fair to say
00:14:10.940 it was a sham impeachment.
00:14:13.240 So they do a sham impeachment,
00:14:14.980 but beyond that,
00:14:16.480 they do it incompetently
00:14:17.960 according to their own standards.
00:14:20.400 So the House wanted witnesses,
00:14:23.300 but did not go through
00:14:24.420 the proper process to get them.
00:14:26.720 By their own description,
00:14:28.040 I don't know how you could call that
00:14:29.960 anything but incompetent.
00:14:32.160 So it was a sham impeachment,
00:14:34.260 which they managed incompetently.
00:14:37.840 And then in order to fix
00:14:39.840 their own incompetence
00:14:41.500 of their sham,
00:14:44.820 they decided that the best way
00:14:46.560 to approach that would be
00:14:47.680 to ask the wrong part of the government
00:14:50.180 to fix their sham hoax incompetence.
00:14:54.540 That actually happened
00:14:57.360 right in front of us.
00:14:59.160 It's funnier when you say it all together.
00:15:01.960 They incompetently managed
00:15:03.960 a sham impeachment,
00:15:05.680 but they thought they could fix it
00:15:07.220 by asking the wrong part
00:15:08.520 of the government to fix it.
00:15:11.680 And surprise, surprise,
00:15:13.000 it didn't work out for them.
00:15:15.680 So if that's not abuse of power,
00:15:17.600 I don't know what is.
00:15:19.860 So it looks like the bullshit of the day,
00:15:22.260 because every day the media
00:15:25.240 and the Democrats collude,
00:15:27.620 they collude, I say,
00:15:29.440 on messaging.
00:15:31.440 And the messaging
00:15:32.120 that they're colluding on
00:15:33.460 seems pretty, pretty obvious today.
00:15:35.880 They're going to be saying
00:15:36.960 that because impeachment
00:15:40.080 did not succeed
00:15:41.060 or is about to fail on Wednesday,
00:15:43.540 they're about to say
00:15:44.400 that Trump has expanded
00:15:45.960 the power of the executive branch,
00:15:48.060 getting closer and closer
00:15:49.180 to being a dictator.
00:15:50.080 He's becoming a dictator.
00:15:54.560 Why is Trump becoming a dictator?
00:15:56.640 Let me explain it again.
00:15:57.860 Because there was a sham impeachment
00:16:00.400 that was done incompetently,
00:16:02.900 and then they asked
00:16:04.160 the wrong part of the government
00:16:05.480 to fix it.
00:16:07.140 Therefore, logically,
00:16:09.300 President Trump is a dictator.
00:16:12.260 You followed the logic, right?
00:16:13.800 That all makes sense to you?
00:16:15.620 Connect the dots?
00:16:17.740 If that didn't make sense to you,
00:16:19.000 you talk to a Democrat
00:16:19.800 because apparently
00:16:20.560 that makes sense to them.
00:16:25.060 So,
00:16:26.540 here's what I say about that.
00:16:30.720 Can you imagine
00:16:31.500 that if the media,
00:16:34.540 the messengers in the media,
00:16:36.180 if they had not packaged this idea
00:16:38.300 that the outcome of this
00:16:40.400 failed sham incompetent impeachment
00:16:43.540 was that the president
00:16:45.900 would become more like a dictator,
00:16:48.260 would anyone have thought of that
00:16:50.940 on their own?
00:16:52.860 In other words,
00:16:53.580 is there anybody
00:16:54.240 sitting down in America
00:16:56.100 watching this on TV,
00:16:58.440 and before the pundits tell them
00:17:00.360 that the natural outcome
00:17:02.520 of all this
00:17:03.100 is that Trump becomes
00:17:04.000 more like a dictator,
00:17:05.700 can you imagine?
00:17:06.600 There's a guy,
00:17:07.960 he's in the middle of the country,
00:17:09.020 sipping a beer,
00:17:10.960 watching the news,
00:17:12.400 and he's thinking to himself,
00:17:14.160 hey,
00:17:14.900 I think the incompetent
00:17:16.600 failed sham impeachment
00:17:18.120 that they tried to fix
00:17:20.440 by asking the wrong part
00:17:21.640 of the government,
00:17:22.660 I think is going to make
00:17:24.300 Trump
00:17:25.040 look, look, look, look, look,
00:17:26.480 more of a dictator.
00:17:29.300 There are
00:17:32.500 how many
00:17:34.280 hundreds of millions
00:17:35.380 of people
00:17:35.820 in the United States?
00:17:37.700 The number of them
00:17:38.940 who would have come up
00:17:39.920 with that interpretation
00:17:41.220 on their own
00:17:42.160 without being prompted
00:17:44.320 by the media messengers
00:17:45.600 and brainwashers,
00:17:47.220 I think is zero.
00:17:50.200 Zero?
00:17:51.620 Do you think
00:17:52.400 even one person
00:17:53.460 would have thought
00:17:54.020 of that on their own?
00:17:55.900 I mean,
00:17:56.260 it's batshit crazy.
00:17:58.380 Yeah,
00:17:58.520 so the 360
00:18:00.300 or 80 million
00:18:01.100 or whatever,
00:18:01.760 how many people
00:18:02.400 there are
00:18:02.820 in the United States,
00:18:04.660 you know,
00:18:05.000 men, women,
00:18:05.980 children,
00:18:06.520 old people,
00:18:09.020 do you think
00:18:09.760 there was even
00:18:10.180 one person
00:18:11.000 in the whole country
00:18:12.420 who would have come up
00:18:13.660 with that
00:18:14.160 on their own?
00:18:15.420 And yet,
00:18:16.160 that is the primary
00:18:17.440 message of the day.
00:18:18.560 They've all decided
00:18:19.980 that the message is
00:18:20.940 Trump,
00:18:22.480 he's taking it
00:18:23.460 to a new level
00:18:24.120 of dictatorship.
00:18:26.320 All right,
00:18:26.680 so pretty funny.
00:18:28.520 So Trump
00:18:30.660 tweeted an article
00:18:32.720 by Olivia Nuzzi.
00:18:35.840 Nuzzi?
00:18:36.980 So she's sort of
00:18:37.900 an anti-Trumper,
00:18:38.780 but she wrote this article
00:18:39.660 that I thought
00:18:40.220 was weirdly balanced
00:18:43.480 until it wasn't.
00:18:45.120 And she talked about
00:18:46.360 how the Trump rallies,
00:18:48.960 at least in her
00:18:50.000 subjective opinion,
00:18:51.160 I haven't been to a rally,
00:18:52.300 so I can't verify
00:18:53.920 that this is true or false.
00:18:55.400 But it was interesting
00:18:57.240 that an anti-Trumper
00:18:59.160 would say
00:18:59.640 that the Trump rallies
00:19:00.540 are like a celebration.
00:19:02.260 Everybody's happy
00:19:02.920 and dancing.
00:19:04.400 And her interpretation
00:19:06.080 was that
00:19:07.000 in the beginning,
00:19:08.480 when Trump was running
00:19:09.520 for president,
00:19:10.660 it seemed that
00:19:11.300 they were angry.
00:19:12.880 So Trump supporters,
00:19:14.280 according to her,
00:19:15.060 have changed
00:19:15.640 from this angry mob
00:19:17.060 who wanted to,
00:19:17.840 I don't know,
00:19:18.780 get revenge,
00:19:19.780 change the country,
00:19:20.860 break the government,
00:19:21.660 whatever it is
00:19:22.160 they wanted.
00:19:22.560 But now they're
00:19:24.360 getting what they want.
00:19:25.520 They have a President Trump.
00:19:27.000 The country is running
00:19:27.820 well in their opinion.
00:19:29.380 And so they're celebrating.
00:19:31.360 This is a pretty big deal
00:19:33.020 because I was talking
00:19:35.940 to somebody smart
00:19:36.740 the other day
00:19:37.340 who was saying
00:19:38.700 that there could be
00:19:40.060 a problem with motivation,
00:19:42.180 that Trump voters
00:19:43.760 might not be motivated
00:19:45.200 because they sort of
00:19:46.280 got what they wanted.
00:19:47.560 So it doesn't make you
00:19:48.980 get off the couch
00:19:49.780 unless you want
00:19:50.820 to change something.
00:19:51.600 You know,
00:19:52.380 it's easier to get up
00:19:53.380 and go to the polls
00:19:54.840 and get excited
00:19:55.820 and everything
00:19:56.260 if something is intolerable
00:19:58.140 and you've just
00:19:58.920 got to go change it.
00:20:00.360 Now,
00:20:01.100 I hear that argument.
00:20:03.580 That's not historically
00:20:06.720 that I would say
00:20:07.900 that has some validity.
00:20:09.040 But here's what's different.
00:20:11.000 Everything about Trump.
00:20:13.420 Let me just summarize.
00:20:15.000 Here's what's different
00:20:15.820 about Trump.
00:20:16.840 Everything.
00:20:17.960 Everything.
00:20:18.700 Just everything.
00:20:19.200 So every rule
00:20:20.480 that used to work
00:20:21.520 doesn't exactly
00:20:23.700 automatically work
00:20:24.840 with Trump.
00:20:26.380 And here's what's different.
00:20:28.180 Trump supporters
00:20:29.060 have turned
00:20:29.820 the whole Trump phenomenon
00:20:31.340 into a walking party.
00:20:35.680 They enjoy it
00:20:37.680 for literally
00:20:38.420 the entertainment of it.
00:20:40.240 And I don't know
00:20:41.320 if we can quite yet
00:20:43.000 measure
00:20:43.660 what impact
00:20:45.760 being entertained
00:20:47.100 has on people's motivation
00:20:49.420 to actually
00:20:50.440 get off the couch
00:20:51.260 and go vote.
00:20:53.220 I think,
00:20:54.620 especially since
00:20:55.460 the experience
00:20:56.120 of 2016
00:20:56.860 where the people
00:20:57.620 who voted for Trump
00:20:58.600 had this amazing
00:21:00.520 endorphin
00:21:01.980 dopamine hit
00:21:03.100 when he won
00:21:04.160 the election.
00:21:04.640 So imagine
00:21:05.980 this feeling.
00:21:07.360 You were a Trump supporter
00:21:08.740 in early 2016
00:21:10.120 and before maybe.
00:21:11.740 You'd been beat up.
00:21:13.100 You'd been called
00:21:13.620 a racist.
00:21:14.520 You'd been told
00:21:15.100 you're not going to win.
00:21:16.640 You're supporting
00:21:17.480 a crazy man,
00:21:18.400 a dictator.
00:21:19.100 There's no way
00:21:19.720 it's going to be Hillary.
00:21:20.800 You're all going to pay.
00:21:22.080 I mean,
00:21:22.360 really some dark,
00:21:23.640 literally,
00:21:24.580 dark thoughts
00:21:25.500 about you
00:21:26.540 and your candidate.
00:21:27.680 And then,
00:21:28.820 against all odds,
00:21:31.180 on election night,
00:21:32.080 you turn on the TV
00:21:33.760 and the unbelievable
00:21:36.020 happens.
00:21:37.540 The thing that
00:21:38.140 you wanted to happen,
00:21:39.460 some of you expected it,
00:21:41.000 a lot of you didn't.
00:21:42.820 And suddenly,
00:21:44.300 bam,
00:21:45.600 something happened.
00:21:47.220 President Trump
00:21:48.040 won Florida.
00:21:49.700 He won the election.
00:21:51.500 Bam.
00:21:52.500 How did that feel?
00:21:54.860 Think about it.
00:21:56.440 That felt
00:21:57.380 so good
00:21:59.160 for the people
00:21:59.900 who wanted him to win,
00:22:00.900 the people who voted for him,
00:22:01.780 that felt so good
00:22:03.700 that I can say
00:22:05.740 that in my lifetime,
00:22:07.900 you know,
00:22:08.260 if you don't count
00:22:09.120 like,
00:22:09.740 you know,
00:22:10.040 intimate physical relationships
00:22:11.640 and,
00:22:12.280 you know,
00:22:12.560 maybe falling in love
00:22:13.840 or something,
00:22:14.700 but outside of those things,
00:22:17.160 I don't know
00:22:17.780 if I've ever felt
00:22:18.560 a better feeling.
00:22:19.840 Really.
00:22:20.680 Now,
00:22:21.080 I was pretty deeply invested,
00:22:22.760 so I had more to win,
00:22:24.140 more to lose.
00:22:25.180 You know,
00:22:25.560 I was definitely out there
00:22:26.960 because I was so public
00:22:29.140 about my prediction
00:22:30.160 that he would win.
00:22:30.800 but
00:22:31.660 I've never felt
00:22:33.440 anything that good
00:22:34.480 outside of
00:22:35.260 close personal relationships
00:22:37.280 and I'd like to feel it again.
00:22:40.580 I have to think
00:22:41.760 that the people
00:22:42.780 who voted for him
00:22:43.680 and got that,
00:22:44.520 you know,
00:22:44.800 the dopamine hit,
00:22:46.360 want that again.
00:22:47.720 I don't know
00:22:48.560 that regular voters
00:22:49.780 who vote for regular candidates
00:22:52.260 and win,
00:22:53.600 they feel happy.
00:22:55.060 I mean,
00:22:55.260 I think people
00:22:55.820 who voted for Obama
00:22:57.020 were happy,
00:22:57.580 don't you think?
00:22:59.880 But I think
00:23:00.280 the Trump voters
00:23:01.900 got a dopamine hit
00:23:02.880 that was probably
00:23:03.560 unprecedented
00:23:04.320 because it was
00:23:05.340 more unexpected.
00:23:08.080 And I think
00:23:08.900 that that's going to
00:23:09.700 drive a lot of people
00:23:10.480 to the polls.
00:23:11.220 They're going to be,
00:23:11.720 they'll want to feel
00:23:14.000 how good it feels
00:23:15.340 again.
00:23:16.740 And some people
00:23:17.640 didn't feel it
00:23:18.220 the first time
00:23:18.760 and want to feel it.
00:23:20.160 So I think
00:23:20.840 they're going to want
00:23:21.360 to go feel that feeling.
00:23:22.340 So I'm not worried
00:23:23.960 about enthusiasm
00:23:24.660 from Republicans.
00:23:26.720 And by the way,
00:23:28.220 if we're going to make
00:23:29.380 some gross generalizations,
00:23:31.120 let me make
00:23:31.560 a gross generalization,
00:23:32.920 all right?
00:23:34.860 And this doesn't
00:23:35.700 apply to every person.
00:23:37.460 There are no gross
00:23:38.500 generalizations
00:23:39.160 that apply
00:23:39.780 to each individual.
00:23:41.180 But as a,
00:23:42.260 let's say,
00:23:44.120 a gross generalization,
00:23:45.160 I think it's true
00:23:47.080 that what you could say
00:23:48.580 about a conservative
00:23:49.720 voter
00:23:50.280 versus a liberal voter
00:23:51.780 is that the conservative
00:23:53.920 will do what feels right
00:23:56.040 even if it's hard.
00:23:59.820 See where I'm going
00:24:00.840 with this?
00:24:01.560 The conservative voter
00:24:02.840 is still going to vote
00:24:04.180 even if it's hard.
00:24:06.220 If their schedule
00:24:07.260 doesn't work,
00:24:08.120 their car broke down,
00:24:09.400 because voting
00:24:10.640 is important.
00:24:11.600 So I'm not sure
00:24:12.600 that motivation
00:24:13.260 means exactly
00:24:14.240 the same thing
00:24:15.140 to a conservative
00:24:16.380 voter
00:24:16.860 versus a liberal voter.
00:24:18.720 I think a liberal
00:24:19.880 voter needs more
00:24:20.900 of maybe
00:24:21.620 an emotional reason.
00:24:23.960 I think a conservative
00:24:24.880 voter is just
00:24:26.340 going to vote anyway
00:24:27.180 because why?
00:24:28.680 It's who they are.
00:24:29.720 It's part of their identity.
00:24:31.600 They're people
00:24:32.000 who support
00:24:32.560 the Constitution.
00:24:33.760 They vote.
00:24:35.260 So I don't think
00:24:36.360 anybody's going to
00:24:36.920 stay home
00:24:37.380 who's a conservative.
00:24:38.380 I don't see that happening.
00:24:39.880 Let's talk about Bernie.
00:24:42.960 So all the chatter
00:24:44.560 by the political
00:24:45.660 talking heads,
00:24:46.660 they're saying that
00:24:47.280 Bernie is surging
00:24:48.720 in the polls.
00:24:50.420 Depending on what poll
00:24:51.600 you look at,
00:24:52.180 he's winning everywhere
00:24:53.180 or he's at least
00:24:53.920 tied with Biden.
00:24:54.880 But all the talk
00:24:56.220 is about Bernie,
00:24:57.000 Bernie, Bernie.
00:24:58.060 And so I thought
00:24:58.840 I would run you
00:24:59.740 through a little bit
00:25:01.940 of Bernie strategy.
00:25:04.200 In other words,
00:25:05.120 how to beat Bernie
00:25:06.940 if you're President Trump.
00:25:09.380 The first thing
00:25:10.260 I would note
00:25:10.700 is that it seems to me,
00:25:13.360 and this could be
00:25:14.180 just a biased interpretation,
00:25:15.380 but it seems to me
00:25:16.500 that Bernie supporters
00:25:18.280 are disconnected
00:25:19.380 from policy.
00:25:22.120 Now, certainly
00:25:23.080 there are plenty
00:25:23.740 of Bernie supporters
00:25:24.820 who want his policies,
00:25:27.940 and they're not disconnected.
00:25:29.220 They want exactly
00:25:30.300 what he's offering.
00:25:32.060 But when I look at the,
00:25:34.020 and I'm going to use
00:25:35.060 some names without,
00:25:37.500 you know,
00:25:37.820 let me admit
00:25:38.880 I can't read minds,
00:25:40.580 but when I see people
00:25:41.600 like Bill Maher
00:25:42.360 jump in,
00:25:43.040 and I see Joe Rogan
00:25:45.380 supporting Sanders,
00:25:47.720 when I see people
00:25:48.580 like that supporting him,
00:25:50.020 I say to myself,
00:25:51.720 is it because
00:25:52.420 of the policies?
00:25:54.360 Do you think Bill Maher,
00:25:55.860 I'm just asking
00:25:56.600 because I don't know,
00:25:57.460 can't read their minds
00:25:58.240 and I won't make
00:25:58.840 an assumption,
00:26:00.320 but do you think
00:26:01.120 that they support him
00:26:01.940 for his policies?
00:26:03.840 Because that's certainly
00:26:05.300 not what Joe Rogan said
00:26:06.780 when he mentioned
00:26:08.360 that he might vote for him.
00:26:10.060 What he mentioned
00:26:10.860 was his,
00:26:11.740 I don't know,
00:26:12.300 consistency
00:26:13.000 and authenticity,
00:26:14.460 something like that.
00:26:15.600 And those are much
00:26:16.480 to be admired.
00:26:18.120 You know,
00:26:18.360 I have the same feeling
00:26:19.180 about Bernie.
00:26:20.240 There's a whole bunch
00:26:21.260 about Bernie
00:26:21.860 that's pretty good stuff,
00:26:23.960 but not his policies.
00:26:26.700 His policies
00:26:27.560 are not good stuff.
00:26:28.980 So that's the first observation,
00:26:30.840 that there's,
00:26:31.920 some people want
00:26:32.840 to beat Trump
00:26:33.580 or just be on
00:26:34.300 the winning side
00:26:35.020 or signal that they're,
00:26:37.920 you know,
00:26:38.540 part of good people,
00:26:39.680 not bad people.
00:26:40.400 Whatever it is
00:26:41.440 they're thinking,
00:26:42.400 it does seem
00:26:43.660 disconnected from policy.
00:26:46.520 So that's the first point.
00:26:49.920 Then let's look
00:26:51.180 at the matchup.
00:26:53.040 You've got,
00:26:53.520 you've got a
00:26:55.860 President Trump
00:26:56.820 who,
00:26:57.640 at least his supporters,
00:26:59.080 who would,
00:26:59.440 you'd have to peel away
00:27:00.700 some of his supporters
00:27:01.740 to Bernie
00:27:02.420 in order for Bernie
00:27:03.640 to win.
00:27:04.080 and so you want
00:27:06.380 a good matchup.
00:27:08.240 What would Republicans,
00:27:10.000 the ones that Bernie
00:27:10.700 needs to,
00:27:11.560 you know,
00:27:11.860 even the independents,
00:27:13.060 I guess,
00:27:13.620 the ones he wants
00:27:14.300 to wean away
00:27:14.900 from Trump,
00:27:15.820 what would those people
00:27:17.060 think is Trump's
00:27:18.980 biggest error,
00:27:20.740 mistake,
00:27:21.340 or flaw?
00:27:22.560 The people that Bernie
00:27:23.600 wants to convert.
00:27:25.180 I would say,
00:27:25.940 they would say
00:27:26.340 the deficit,
00:27:27.660 deficit spending,
00:27:28.680 wouldn't you?
00:27:29.440 Wouldn't you say
00:27:30.180 if you were talking
00:27:30.800 to a conservative
00:27:31.540 and you said,
00:27:32.340 okay,
00:27:32.540 I know you like Trump,
00:27:33.840 but tell me
00:27:35.000 what you don't like
00:27:35.860 about him.
00:27:37.240 Nine out of ten
00:27:38.220 are going to list
00:27:39.240 the deficit
00:27:40.220 and the top
00:27:40.980 one or two reasons.
00:27:42.940 Right?
00:27:43.780 So,
00:27:44.420 how does Bernie
00:27:45.080 line up
00:27:46.080 on the most
00:27:47.100 important point?
00:27:49.060 He's the only
00:27:50.000 candidate you could
00:27:50.920 imagine running
00:27:51.700 against Trump
00:27:52.640 who would make
00:27:53.380 the deficit worse.
00:27:55.380 He's the only one
00:27:56.540 who would make it worse.
00:27:58.140 Forget about the fact
00:27:59.100 he would probably
00:27:59.640 crash the economy
00:28:00.640 and make us weaker
00:28:02.300 internationally
00:28:03.000 and whatever else
00:28:03.800 you think about him.
00:28:05.140 On a matchup,
00:28:07.160 he's the worst person
00:28:08.420 you could run
00:28:09.300 against somebody
00:28:09.920 who only has
00:28:10.600 one measurable flaw.
00:28:15.680 President Trump
00:28:16.440 has a lot of
00:28:17.160 subjective things
00:28:19.540 you can't measure.
00:28:20.540 Hey,
00:28:20.720 his personality,
00:28:21.940 I think he's dangerous.
00:28:23.500 He might be impulsive.
00:28:25.120 So,
00:28:25.500 he's got lots of that stuff
00:28:26.640 that you can't measure.
00:28:27.960 But the one thing
00:28:28.720 you can measure
00:28:29.400 that he's
00:28:30.920 unambiguously
00:28:31.920 bad at
00:28:32.960 is the deficit.
00:28:34.860 And they're going
00:28:35.300 to run the only guy
00:28:36.200 who makes that worse
00:28:37.160 against that?
00:28:38.820 How does that make sense?
00:28:40.240 That's the worst
00:28:40.740 matchup ever.
00:28:42.340 You know,
00:28:42.600 plus you've got somebody
00:28:43.480 with a booming economy
00:28:44.600 running against somebody
00:28:46.160 who wants to
00:28:46.620 completely transition it.
00:28:48.380 What?
00:28:49.780 Now,
00:28:50.340 what is the other thing
00:28:51.380 that Trump has
00:28:52.960 as sort of
00:28:53.960 a political weakness?
00:28:55.660 And I wouldn't say
00:28:56.440 this is what
00:28:57.060 Republicans say
00:28:58.080 about him,
00:28:58.560 but it's more about
00:28:59.360 what Democrats
00:29:00.560 say about him.
00:29:01.340 Because Bernie
00:29:01.760 also has to get
00:29:02.600 Democrats
00:29:03.180 to,
00:29:04.540 you know,
00:29:05.080 be unified
00:29:06.100 against Trump.
00:29:08.100 And one of the
00:29:08.620 biggest complaints
00:29:09.380 from prior years
00:29:11.540 about Trump
00:29:12.100 is that he's
00:29:12.720 a misogynist.
00:29:14.160 You know,
00:29:14.360 he's not good
00:29:15.120 for women.
00:29:16.700 Who is the only
00:29:17.740 candidate who
00:29:18.600 also has
00:29:19.540 that issue,
00:29:21.220 at least in terms
00:29:21.920 of his supporters,
00:29:22.820 not in terms of him?
00:29:23.600 Bernie.
00:29:25.160 Bernie is weak
00:29:26.560 on women.
00:29:29.120 Now,
00:29:29.740 here's the thing.
00:29:30.560 He's not weak
00:29:31.200 on women.
00:29:32.460 There's literally
00:29:33.240 nothing that Bernie's
00:29:34.220 ever said or done
00:29:35.180 that is anything
00:29:36.720 but positive
00:29:37.500 for basically
00:29:38.240 everybody.
00:29:39.160 You know,
00:29:39.320 that's the consistency
00:29:40.680 argument that
00:29:42.220 Joe Rogan points out,
00:29:43.340 and it's true.
00:29:44.740 I think Bernie
00:29:45.520 has a 100%
00:29:46.480 solid record
00:29:47.400 of being supportive
00:29:48.260 of women,
00:29:49.400 being supportive
00:29:49.940 of, you know,
00:29:50.820 blacks,
00:29:51.400 being supportive
00:29:51.800 of everybody.
00:29:52.320 But the trouble
00:29:57.900 is that
00:29:59.000 through the
00:29:59.720 election campaign,
00:30:01.180 his supporters
00:30:02.120 are being painted
00:30:03.480 as misogynist,
00:30:05.220 and boy,
00:30:06.120 and boy,
00:30:08.120 do they act
00:30:08.520 that way,
00:30:09.100 at least online.
00:30:10.420 Now,
00:30:10.880 I don't know
00:30:11.560 what percentage
00:30:12.280 act that way.
00:30:13.040 It's probably
00:30:13.320 a low percentage,
00:30:14.480 but the active ones
00:30:15.660 that you see a lot
00:30:16.440 on social media,
00:30:18.060 they tend to be
00:30:19.460 kind of
00:30:20.860 anti-woman-ish
00:30:23.120 in their approach.
00:30:24.320 I don't know
00:30:24.620 how many there are.
00:30:25.840 So just in terms
00:30:26.660 of impressions,
00:30:27.660 well,
00:30:27.900 none of this is real,
00:30:28.900 at least in terms
00:30:29.540 of Bernie's own views,
00:30:31.280 he looks like
00:30:32.920 he's not that
00:30:33.720 strong with women.
00:30:35.820 And I think,
00:30:36.840 what is his breakdown
00:30:37.880 of men versus women
00:30:39.200 who support him?
00:30:40.680 Bernie appeals more
00:30:41.620 to men,
00:30:42.060 doesn't he?
00:30:43.180 Somebody has to
00:30:43.900 fact check me on that.
00:30:45.300 So if you've got
00:30:45.980 somebody who appeals
00:30:46.820 more to men
00:30:47.740 running against Trump,
00:30:49.220 I don't know
00:30:50.320 if that's the way
00:30:51.060 you get the woman vote.
00:30:53.540 Let me put this
00:30:54.580 in other terms.
00:30:56.860 Trump could say,
00:30:58.360 and I'll just give you
00:30:59.160 some messaging
00:31:00.080 that he could use
00:31:00.980 to run against Bernie.
00:31:02.400 Trump could say
00:31:03.180 that Bernie won't
00:31:05.200 protect you,
00:31:06.580 but Trump already is.
00:31:09.340 Suppose you're trying
00:31:10.240 to get the female vote.
00:31:13.240 Protection
00:31:13.720 is a really strong word.
00:31:16.560 because I think
00:31:17.980 there is a male-female
00:31:18.920 difference in terms
00:31:20.260 of how frightened
00:31:21.720 you would be
00:31:22.460 about certain risks.
00:31:25.100 Men tend to be
00:31:26.600 less frightened
00:31:27.620 about physical risks
00:31:30.380 because we don't
00:31:32.620 have as many.
00:31:33.480 If I go out in public,
00:31:35.080 the odds of me
00:31:35.820 being assaulted
00:31:37.100 by anybody in public
00:31:38.360 are pretty close
00:31:40.220 to zero.
00:31:41.340 For a woman,
00:31:42.240 it's a continuous,
00:31:43.500 every time you go outside,
00:31:44.520 you've got to risk.
00:31:46.080 So protection
00:31:47.180 is one of those words
00:31:48.520 that I think
00:31:49.100 just has more
00:31:50.560 deep meaning
00:31:51.540 to women
00:31:52.640 because they live
00:31:53.980 in a more dangerous world
00:31:55.200 than men do,
00:31:56.300 subjectively speaking,
00:31:58.160 and statistically speaking
00:31:59.820 as well.
00:32:00.680 So I think Trump
00:32:01.600 could say
00:32:02.040 he's already protecting us
00:32:03.480 in all these ways.
00:32:04.620 He's good on law enforcement.
00:32:06.780 He's tough on terrorists
00:32:09.240 and all that.
00:32:09.780 So that's a Trump
00:32:12.100 advantage.
00:32:17.560 And then there's
00:32:19.560 a practical question.
00:32:21.460 How would Bernie
00:32:22.100 get any of his policies
00:32:23.320 passed?
00:32:24.820 I don't think
00:32:25.720 Bernie is popular
00:32:27.100 enough
00:32:27.960 even with Democrats
00:32:29.120 because there are
00:32:29.860 enough Democrats
00:32:30.500 who know his math
00:32:31.360 doesn't work.
00:32:32.020 They're not going to
00:32:32.480 sign up for his things.
00:32:34.420 What would be the point
00:32:36.260 of electing Bernie?
00:32:38.440 Because you know
00:32:39.080 his policies
00:32:39.740 wouldn't pass, right?
00:32:40.760 The big stuff
00:32:41.400 doesn't really have
00:32:42.020 a chance, does it?
00:32:43.200 I don't think so.
00:32:44.880 I suppose they could
00:32:45.740 hope that they get
00:32:47.800 the entire Congress
00:32:48.740 but I doubt it.
00:32:50.660 All right.
00:32:50.920 So here are a few things.
00:32:53.920 Well, let me describe
00:32:55.080 an ad
00:32:57.640 or a meme
00:32:58.700 or maybe it's a
00:32:59.900 viral video
00:33:00.820 or something
00:33:01.240 that would take out
00:33:02.880 Bernie
00:33:03.740 and it would go
00:33:05.600 like this.
00:33:06.180 It's a five-second
00:33:07.640 advertisement
00:33:08.340 political ad
00:33:09.340 starts with a
00:33:10.780 black screen
00:33:11.640 and then you see
00:33:12.960 an EKG heartbeat
00:33:14.240 go
00:33:14.540 and then the voiceover
00:33:18.540 says something like
00:33:19.800 the economy
00:33:21.400 is the best
00:33:22.320 it's ever been.
00:33:24.140 Why would you
00:33:24.720 ever take a chance?
00:33:26.260 Don't take a chance.
00:33:29.240 And then the EKG
00:33:31.400 would just flatline.
00:33:33.000 So the words
00:33:33.940 would talk about
00:33:34.580 the economy.
00:33:36.660 See where I'm
00:33:37.160 going here?
00:33:38.260 So it would be
00:33:39.140 an analogy
00:33:39.800 between the heartbeat
00:33:41.360 it's fine
00:33:42.400 boom
00:33:42.780 boom
00:33:43.080 boom
00:33:43.140 boom
00:33:43.420 boom
00:33:43.740 boom
00:33:43.780 bzzz
00:33:45.360 why would you
00:33:47.000 take a chance
00:33:47.620 with an economy
00:33:48.320 that's the best
00:33:48.980 in the world?
00:33:50.540 But what would
00:33:51.640 people think?
00:33:52.880 They would immediately
00:33:53.740 be reminded
00:33:54.440 of Bernie's
00:33:55.440 recent heart attack
00:33:57.460 and it's all
00:33:59.520 anybody would
00:34:00.040 talk about
00:34:00.500 in the ad
00:34:01.140 because the ad
00:34:01.860 would be about
00:34:02.320 the economy
00:34:02.940 boop boop boop
00:34:03.920 boop
00:34:04.060 it's going great
00:34:04.840 don't do this
00:34:06.040 don't flatline
00:34:07.620 the economy
00:34:08.180 right?
00:34:10.500 Five second
00:34:11.220 commercial
00:34:11.740 black screen
00:34:13.340 heartbeat
00:34:14.540 voiceover
00:34:16.540 done
00:34:18.140 that's the end
00:34:19.100 of the election
00:34:19.600 because it's so
00:34:21.260 scary
00:34:21.760 and it's so
00:34:23.800 right
00:34:24.160 it's completely
00:34:25.420 right
00:34:25.800 people don't
00:34:26.800 like taking
00:34:27.340 chances with
00:34:28.100 an economy
00:34:28.620 that's working
00:34:29.360 if you talk
00:34:30.460 about the
00:34:30.980 risk
00:34:31.540 it's over
00:34:33.140 all right
00:34:34.860 here's an
00:34:36.040 update on me
00:34:37.000 remember I
00:34:38.040 told you that
00:34:38.820 Google
00:34:39.740 through YouTube
00:34:42.100 seemed to be
00:34:43.940 limiting my
00:34:44.980 YouTube videos
00:34:46.040 and demonetizing
00:34:47.460 them
00:34:47.680 now when they
00:34:48.200 demonetize them
00:34:49.060 it means that
00:34:49.560 they don't run
00:34:50.100 ads
00:34:50.420 the creator
00:34:51.700 doesn't get
00:34:52.340 paid for the
00:34:53.360 time that people
00:34:53.940 watch it with
00:34:54.680 no ads
00:34:55.140 but worse than
00:34:58.060 that when it's
00:34:59.280 demonetized it
00:35:00.180 doesn't get
00:35:00.620 recommended by
00:35:01.460 YouTube so it
00:35:02.660 gets much less
00:35:03.480 awareness
00:35:04.580 so I was
00:35:06.160 talking to
00:35:06.640 Google and
00:35:08.180 I actually got
00:35:09.200 a hold of
00:35:09.740 the group
00:35:10.960 very small
00:35:12.140 group and one
00:35:12.880 person in
00:35:13.380 particular who
00:35:14.600 handles these
00:35:15.380 kinds of
00:35:15.840 questions for
00:35:16.620 Google for
00:35:17.620 YouTube and
00:35:19.020 they're working
00:35:19.700 with me and
00:35:20.540 apparently they're
00:35:21.160 putting together
00:35:21.780 a beta
00:35:24.400 program if you
00:35:25.960 will that I'm
00:35:27.060 trying to get
00:35:27.860 into and it
00:35:28.640 looks like I
00:35:29.060 will in which
00:35:30.420 there'll be some
00:35:31.200 people who might
00:35:32.060 be whitelisted in
00:35:33.200 other words I
00:35:34.540 wouldn't be
00:35:35.060 automatically
00:35:35.560 demonetized
00:35:36.480 because I have a
00:35:39.260 long history of
00:35:40.620 not doing anything
00:35:41.400 that would make me
00:35:42.320 demonetized so as
00:35:43.620 long as you have a
00:35:44.160 long history of
00:35:44.940 not crossing that
00:35:46.420 line you could
00:35:47.660 potentially once
00:35:49.400 this is implemented
00:35:50.200 could potentially
00:35:51.660 not be demonetized
00:35:53.980 automatically so
00:35:54.800 we'll see how that
00:35:55.320 goes I'll keep you
00:35:56.020 informed as that
00:35:56.740 goes if it
00:35:58.080 happens it would
00:35:58.720 happen in the
00:35:59.520 spring I think so
00:36:01.400 we're talking about
00:36:01.960 a few months from
00:36:02.660 now but if you
00:36:04.040 see my YouTube
00:36:04.820 numbers jump that's
00:36:07.500 why there is a
00:36:09.940 horrible story in
00:36:12.000 the news about a
00:36:13.400 health records
00:36:14.280 company someone
00:36:15.620 who sells software
00:36:17.360 to doctors in
00:36:19.140 which the software
00:36:19.940 company worked with
00:36:20.820 an opioid producer
00:36:22.700 the news is
00:36:24.300 reporting it's
00:36:25.220 probably Purdue
00:36:26.160 but that's not
00:36:27.540 confirmed and that
00:36:29.520 the software company
00:36:30.400 accepted money from
00:36:31.620 the opioid making
00:36:34.040 company to have a
00:36:36.860 little screen pop up
00:36:37.940 to suggest more
00:36:39.440 opioids and suggest
00:36:41.080 that somebody manage
00:36:41.980 their pain with
00:36:42.520 opioids and it was
00:36:44.080 even created to
00:36:46.480 to have basically
00:36:48.600 to market opioids
00:36:50.180 more aggressively
00:36:51.060 in a sort of
00:36:53.340 clever way but
00:36:54.760 also to get people
00:36:55.560 to take prescriptions
00:36:57.000 longer
00:36:57.560 now how evil is
00:37:04.180 that yeah I'm
00:37:05.580 looking look at
00:37:06.300 look at the
00:37:06.780 comments every
00:37:08.000 other comment is
00:37:09.000 oh my god oh
00:37:11.260 my god what would
00:37:12.960 what do you think
00:37:13.800 should be the
00:37:14.520 legal penalty
00:37:15.540 for bribing a
00:37:18.560 software company
00:37:19.420 to push your
00:37:20.180 opioids which
00:37:21.020 would cause
00:37:21.600 certainly they
00:37:22.460 would know by
00:37:23.040 then would cause
00:37:24.300 people to be
00:37:24.880 addicted who
00:37:25.440 didn't need to
00:37:25.880 be addicted what
00:37:26.640 should be the
00:37:27.220 what should be the
00:37:28.440 penalty for that
00:37:29.320 at least life in
00:37:31.720 prison wouldn't
00:37:33.440 you say now I
00:37:35.460 think you could
00:37:35.940 argue for the
00:37:36.560 death penalty but
00:37:37.500 the way society is
00:37:38.840 organized at the
00:37:39.500 moment it's
00:37:39.980 unlikely you would
00:37:40.640 succeed but at
00:37:41.840 least life in
00:37:43.400 prison that's
00:37:45.780 one of the most
00:37:46.480 evil things you'll
00:37:47.160 ever see I mean
00:37:49.240 it's just shocking
00:37:50.420 did any of you
00:37:52.880 see that the the
00:37:55.200 funny video of
00:37:56.160 Chuck Schumer was
00:37:57.000 getting ready to be
00:37:57.940 somber and and
00:37:59.600 solemn and give a
00:38:00.800 little speech about
00:38:01.700 the the vote about
00:38:03.580 witnesses with
00:38:04.640 impeachment and
00:38:06.160 Kamala Harris was
00:38:07.160 standing behind him
00:38:08.300 and joking around
00:38:10.580 with Sherrod Brown
00:38:11.700 and and Schumer
00:38:14.860 turns around and
00:38:15.780 he has to like put
00:38:16.540 up the hand to
00:38:17.320 shush her like
00:38:18.360 Schumer's like
00:38:18.980 acting serious so
00:38:19.940 he has to he has
00:38:21.260 to shush her
00:38:21.940 happiness and if
00:38:23.880 you haven't seen
00:38:24.320 the video it's very
00:38:25.380 funny because
00:38:26.120 Kamala Harris makes
00:38:28.320 a face so so
00:38:30.880 Schumer looks at
00:38:31.680 her and hushes
00:38:32.360 her but as soon
00:38:33.380 as Schumer turns
00:38:34.700 back toward the
00:38:35.360 audience Kamala
00:38:36.900 makes like a
00:38:38.080 humorous face
00:38:38.780 like like a
00:38:40.200 child who's just
00:38:41.040 been scolded by
00:38:42.300 a parent but
00:38:43.140 isn't really sorry
00:38:44.160 about it it was
00:38:45.700 actually a pretty
00:38:46.320 funny reaction now
00:38:48.280 of course
00:38:49.320 conservatives are
00:38:50.760 you know floating
00:38:51.940 that around because
00:38:52.660 it's funny and it
00:38:53.300 makes Kamala Harris
00:38:54.240 look bad and it
00:38:54.940 makes her whole
00:38:55.420 impeachment look
00:38:56.080 ridiculous because
00:38:57.400 they're laughing and
00:38:58.140 joking and only
00:38:58.900 pretending to be
00:38:59.740 solemn so you know
00:39:01.560 politically it's it's
00:39:02.640 a fun little viral
00:39:03.900 video but here
00:39:05.740 here's the thing
00:39:06.820 I did not like
00:39:09.840 Kamala Harris
00:39:11.700 less because of
00:39:13.180 it and I'm
00:39:15.340 curious if anybody
00:39:16.320 had the same
00:39:16.940 reaction I feel
00:39:18.180 like I'm too
00:39:18.700 biased because I
00:39:19.640 have this prediction
00:39:20.360 that Biden will
00:39:21.680 get nominated she'll
00:39:22.680 be the vice
00:39:23.300 presidential nomination
00:39:24.560 so I know I'm I
00:39:26.140 know I'm I know
00:39:27.440 I'm biased and I'm
00:39:29.200 just asking if you
00:39:30.320 have the same
00:39:30.920 reaction I didn't
00:39:33.540 mind at all in
00:39:35.300 other words she
00:39:36.600 looked kind of
00:39:38.160 funny and
00:39:40.200 authentic it was a
00:39:45.120 very authentic
00:39:45.880 moment because she
00:39:47.880 and she did it in
00:39:48.740 public on stage and
00:39:50.940 it was a funny
00:39:51.780 spontaneous it was
00:39:54.600 just funny and I
00:39:56.480 haven't seen her
00:39:57.280 actually be funny in
00:39:58.820 a way that I thought
00:39:59.520 was funny and I
00:40:00.680 thought she played
00:40:01.400 it off in a way
00:40:03.700 that I kind of
00:40:04.760 liked did anybody
00:40:07.140 have that experience
00:40:08.060 or was it just me
00:40:09.000 and I'm I'm
00:40:09.820 certainly oh a few
00:40:11.300 other people did
00:40:11.960 yeah there's a few
00:40:13.160 other people and I
00:40:13.900 think most of the
00:40:14.440 people here would
00:40:16.360 not you know be
00:40:17.140 naturally supporters
00:40:19.020 of Kamala Harris
00:40:20.000 yeah okay a whole
00:40:22.200 bunch of you are
00:40:22.760 saying the same
00:40:23.220 thing you know if
00:40:24.460 you looked at just
00:40:25.160 the social media
00:40:26.040 comments and the
00:40:27.040 way the news was
00:40:27.720 handling it it was
00:40:28.460 sort of portrayed
00:40:29.520 as a negative but
00:40:30.840 it looks like a lot
00:40:31.500 of people are had
00:40:32.320 the same feeling I
00:40:33.080 did which was it
00:40:34.380 was kind of cute you
00:40:35.720 know in a good way
00:40:36.400 somebody's saying in
00:40:38.760 the comments she
00:40:39.920 seemed to be flirting
00:40:40.980 with that guy I was
00:40:43.160 gonna say that but I
00:40:46.220 didn't think it was
00:40:47.000 fair I'm very much
00:40:49.820 opposed to the
00:40:51.720 attacks on Kamala
00:40:52.740 Harris that are about
00:40:53.900 her past you know
00:40:55.860 her past relationships
00:40:57.020 with Willie Brown or
00:40:58.100 anything like that
00:40:58.700 I get that it's funny
00:41:00.640 and in social media
00:41:01.740 people do outrageous
00:41:02.980 things and you know
00:41:04.360 anything about sex is
00:41:05.520 gonna get more
00:41:06.080 attention I'm just not
00:41:07.780 on board with any of
00:41:08.680 that stuff I'm just
00:41:09.980 not on board with
00:41:10.740 that because it's not
00:41:11.780 a standard that I
00:41:12.720 would want any of you
00:41:13.620 to have to live to
00:41:14.440 all right I don't
00:41:15.600 want any of you to
00:41:16.980 live up to the
00:41:17.660 standard of what you
00:41:18.900 did years ago in
00:41:20.540 your sex life or in
00:41:22.020 your personal life or
00:41:22.780 anything just let it
00:41:24.600 go it's not a good
00:41:26.740 look to be hammering
00:41:28.640 on that it doesn't
00:41:29.520 it doesn't make you
00:41:30.360 look like a good
00:41:31.060 person and it doesn't
00:41:31.860 make your candidate
00:41:32.520 look like a good
00:41:33.320 person if if you're a
00:41:34.880 Trump supporter and
00:41:36.520 you're tweeting about
00:41:37.480 Kamala Harris you know
00:41:38.940 her knee pads and all
00:41:39.980 the things you see on
00:41:40.760 social media you're not
00:41:42.840 doing a good job for
00:41:43.760 Trump because none of
00:41:45.780 that stuff is making
00:41:46.600 people not want to
00:41:47.680 vote for her it just
00:41:49.240 makes you look like
00:41:50.120 you're a certain kind
00:41:50.860 of person and you're
00:41:52.880 and you're part of
00:41:53.940 Trump's brand by
00:41:55.540 talking about him
00:41:56.360 online so just think
00:41:58.120 about the look that
00:41:59.260 you're putting out
00:41:59.760 there all right so
00:42:03.900 there's that did you
00:42:05.900 see the news that it's
00:42:08.240 unconfirmed but there's
00:42:09.740 a good good reason to
00:42:10.820 believe that the Al
00:42:12.000 Qaeda leader in Yemen
00:42:13.220 was using the word
00:42:15.280 likely killed by an
00:42:16.880 airstrike here's my
00:42:19.720 first reaction to that
00:42:20.840 is Trump running out
00:42:23.220 of targets is Trump
00:42:27.480 so successful at
00:42:29.660 fighting terrorism that
00:42:31.380 we're down to the
00:42:32.340 Al Qaeda leader in
00:42:33.440 Yemen I don't know
00:42:36.080 that doesn't feel like
00:42:37.020 it feels like the all
00:42:38.780 the a targets might be
00:42:39.980 dead maybe maybe he's
00:42:41.860 going down to the
00:42:42.540 second level now I get
00:42:43.840 it I get it there's a
00:42:44.600 big war in Yemen and
00:42:45.800 it's a big hot spot for
00:42:46.880 terrorism and so even
00:42:48.360 though it's a tiny
00:42:48.940 country you know it's
00:42:50.480 important in terms of
00:42:51.400 the war on terror but
00:42:53.480 just the way it feels
00:42:55.100 if you're killing the
00:42:56.920 Al Qaeda leader in
00:42:57.800 Yemen maybe you're
00:42:59.720 running out of targets
00:43:00.600 maybe it's good news
00:43:02.080 you also the the
00:43:06.840 controversy that Mike
00:43:08.620 Bloomberg made it into
00:43:10.180 the next debate but
00:43:11.880 only because the
00:43:13.420 Democrats changed the
00:43:14.920 rules and it appears
00:43:17.020 they changed the rules
00:43:17.980 just for him but I
00:43:20.140 don't know if that's
00:43:20.740 true now that would
00:43:22.300 make sense because
00:43:23.840 Bloomberg has
00:43:24.620 essentially purchased
00:43:25.740 the Democrat Party
00:43:27.100 and when I say he's
00:43:28.700 purchased them what I
00:43:30.360 mean is that he said
00:43:31.280 that even if he doesn't
00:43:32.140 get the nomination he's
00:43:33.220 still going to be
00:43:33.700 running all these
00:43:34.320 anti-Trump campaigns
00:43:35.540 almost certainly will
00:43:37.240 support whoever the
00:43:38.160 candidate is because it's
00:43:39.720 not Trump and he's got
00:43:41.200 hundreds of millions
00:43:41.840 of dollars to push in
00:43:42.860 that direction so yeah
00:43:44.640 the Democrat Party is
00:43:46.400 going to do anything
00:43:47.340 Mike Bloomberg wants
00:43:48.700 he bought them you
00:43:50.640 know they were for
00:43:51.300 sale they had a price
00:43:53.200 he paid it he did it
00:43:55.720 in public we're watching
00:43:57.620 it happen there's no
00:43:58.460 secret here at all I'm
00:44:00.080 going to put hundreds of
00:44:00.860 millions of dollars into
00:44:01.740 the campaign but maybe I
00:44:03.720 wouldn't if he treated
00:44:04.500 me unfairly you know I
00:44:06.400 might ask for a few
00:44:07.240 things they're no big
00:44:08.120 deal a little bit of a
00:44:09.200 rule change it's not an
00:44:10.780 unfair rule and the rule
00:44:12.800 rule change was something
00:44:14.860 about oh number of
00:44:18.280 number of donors or
00:44:19.800 something so they got
00:44:21.300 rid of that in favor of
00:44:22.600 just the poll numbers and
00:44:24.060 his polls have gotten
00:44:25.720 high enough so he's on
00:44:26.520 the stage so here's the
00:44:30.520 weird thing about this in
00:44:32.860 what world does the rich
00:44:35.760 old white guy who uses his
00:44:38.360 billions of dollars to
00:44:39.900 control the big part of
00:44:41.300 the media and buy the
00:44:43.840 election how is he the
00:44:46.520 standard bearer of
00:44:47.460 Democrats like it's just
00:44:49.600 so crazy like I'm usually
00:44:51.940 not not the one who likes
00:44:53.420 to point out the easy
00:44:54.540 hypocrisy stuff you know
00:44:56.100 the easy conflicts I
00:44:57.780 always think they're just
00:44:58.460 too obvious and they're
00:44:59.920 not really fun because
00:45:01.000 everybody's going to be
00:45:01.720 talking about that but
00:45:03.300 it's kind of mind-blowing
00:45:04.400 that the person who is
00:45:06.300 literally the most
00:45:08.000 opposite you could be of
00:45:10.160 the kind of person that
00:45:11.260 the Democrats think is
00:45:12.400 their brand could be
00:45:13.900 their standard bearer
00:45:15.580 it's it's just
00:45:18.520 interesting
00:45:19.000 let's see so let's talk
00:45:26.180 about the biggest mistake
00:45:27.940 that Trump has made for
00:45:29.740 persuasion this will be the
00:45:32.080 first time you've ever
00:45:32.840 heard this so there's
00:45:33.900 nobody in the news who's
00:45:35.060 going to make the point
00:45:35.800 that I'm making unless you
00:45:37.100 heard after this it goes
00:45:38.720 like this we're going to
00:45:39.900 be talking about the
00:45:40.560 coronavirus of course but
00:45:42.580 there's there's new wrinkle
00:45:43.780 to it that I haven't
00:45:44.760 talked about first of all
00:45:46.560 there was a fake news
00:45:47.800 report fake meaning it
00:45:50.480 wasn't the news that was
00:45:51.700 the problem it was the
00:45:52.840 scientists a couple of
00:45:54.240 Indian scientists said
00:45:55.280 they found indicators in
00:45:57.520 the coronavirus that it
00:45:58.860 was a manufactured bioweapon
00:46:00.960 it wasn't I mistakenly
00:46:04.040 tweeted that because it was
00:46:06.540 a couple of scientists
00:46:07.540 and I thought well it's a
00:46:09.160 couple of scientists this
00:46:10.260 would be what are the odds
00:46:11.880 that these scientists would
00:46:14.140 see something that's so
00:46:15.620 checkable in other words
00:46:17.520 you you don't make a claim
00:46:18.700 that's false if it's easy to
00:46:20.680 check it's false and
00:46:22.160 secondly I don't know they
00:46:25.560 didn't seem to have any
00:46:26.380 self-interest they seem to be
00:46:28.840 helping and it was such a
00:46:29.740 specific claim that there
00:46:31.400 were various HIV related
00:46:34.060 pieces put into this you
00:46:36.480 know I'm being non-technical
00:46:37.880 here and then other experts
00:46:40.200 weighed in and looked at
00:46:41.300 their data and said no you're
00:46:42.640 just reading the data wrong
00:46:43.740 that's all it was turns out
00:46:46.280 they just read the data
00:46:47.300 wrong didn't have the right
00:46:49.320 context and that the things
00:46:51.380 they thought they saw was
00:46:53.360 just statistical noise so
00:46:55.100 they just weren't good as
00:46:56.000 statistics apparently so that's
00:46:58.700 the first thing it was not a
00:47:00.160 bioweapon if you saw news
00:47:01.980 yesterday that suggested it
00:47:03.420 was you can adjust that now
00:47:05.420 and here's here's the hell of
00:47:07.680 the thing I think Twitter
00:47:09.820 suspended the website zero
00:47:12.600 hedge for reporting on the
00:47:15.040 story you know incorrectly I
00:47:18.460 think that happened I need
00:47:20.140 some confirmation and I don't
00:47:21.840 know if we'll ever have it if
00:47:23.280 there was any other reason
00:47:24.260 beyond that but I think
00:47:26.580 Twitter's rules are that
00:47:28.400 they'll suspend things that
00:47:30.360 are sort of dangerously
00:47:31.860 inaccurate that news was
00:47:34.760 fake news and at the point
00:47:37.040 that Twitter understood it to
00:47:39.140 be dangerously inaccurate I
00:47:40.900 mean that's a dangerous piece
00:47:42.000 of fake news it really is they
00:47:45.040 they they deleted that site
00:47:48.260 from Twitter and I don't know
00:47:51.540 if that'll get reversed you
00:47:53.320 know maybe they would need to
00:47:54.980 delete or revise an article or
00:47:57.020 something but I hope it gets
00:47:58.920 reversed because zero hedge is
00:48:00.240 actually a pretty interesting
00:48:02.500 site it doesn't mean they're
00:48:05.300 right all the time but the
00:48:06.320 other sites are not either so
00:48:08.640 let me get to Trump's horrible
00:48:12.040 horrible mistake this is one of
00:48:15.160 the biggest mistakes you'll ever
00:48:16.300 see politically strategically and
00:48:18.600 persuasion wise so as you know I've
00:48:20.580 been complaining that the United
00:48:23.400 States has not immediately closed
00:48:25.240 down incoming flights from China
00:48:27.260 well it turns out that some of
00:48:29.100 the airlines themselves are
00:48:30.420 starting to close down traffic
00:48:33.000 Australia just banned incoming
00:48:35.140 flights Hong Kong did so other
00:48:38.060 countries are doing things and I
00:48:39.320 kept asking why are we not doing
00:48:41.760 that or at least why isn't why
00:48:44.940 isn't the government explaining why
00:48:46.540 we're not doing it yes as of an
00:48:49.760 hour ago somebody said in the
00:48:52.340 comments that did we close it down
00:48:55.460 an hour ago did that happen can
00:48:57.220 somebody somebody told me in the
00:48:59.300 comments if that happened I don't
00:49:00.560 know if that's true that might not
00:49:02.500 be true so here's here's why it's
00:49:07.400 dumb on the strategy level political
00:49:09.780 strategy level it's one of the dumbest
00:49:11.720 things I've ever seen in my life
00:49:13.100 there's no world in which Trump would
00:49:15.620 lose votes if he acted too
00:49:19.240 conservatively in other words if he
00:49:21.680 stopped incoming flights more than
00:49:24.900 people thought should have been done
00:49:26.400 even if it hurt the economy a little
00:49:29.300 bit it wouldn't hurt it that much
00:49:30.560 because it only affects travelers it
00:49:32.780 wouldn't affect trade trade with China
00:49:35.100 would be exactly the same and travel
00:49:37.760 probably wouldn't have much of a
00:49:39.180 impact because 30 days later people
00:49:41.320 would make the trips that they
00:49:42.460 postponed but so it was a as far as I
00:49:48.680 can tell unless there was corrupt
00:49:50.420 intent which you always have to
00:49:51.880 suspect in these situations the
00:49:54.380 corruption being not necessarily
00:49:55.700 Trump's but something something in
00:49:58.740 the government it is a dumb risk
00:50:02.860 management to not do the thing that's
00:50:05.540 free and then take the risk that's very
00:50:08.460 expensive because if a number of
00:50:10.920 people die and it could be a very small
00:50:12.480 number if 10 people die of the
00:50:14.600 coronavirus in the United States and
00:50:17.200 we can track it back to the fact that
00:50:18.860 the airport wasn't that the flights
00:50:21.020 weren't locked down sooner people will
00:50:23.940 assume that was the case anyway that's
00:50:26.380 really going to cost Trump so he could
00:50:28.840 lose votes by doing what he did but he
00:50:33.080 could never lose votes if he went the
00:50:34.640 other way why in the world would a
00:50:37.760 politician in an election year do the
00:50:40.500 thing that could lose him votes when he
00:50:42.240 could do the thing that wouldn't lose
00:50:43.400 him votes right it's in it's
00:50:45.140 unexplained and that's why you have to
00:50:47.140 you have to think corruption somewhere
00:50:49.800 somewhere in the government there's
00:50:52.160 something going on it doesn't mean it's
00:50:54.460 Trump himself but he's not fixing it
00:50:56.780 he's not overriding it he has the power
00:50:59.960 I think right he's a dictator now he has
00:51:02.580 the power just kidding all right but
00:51:07.060 here's so that so far everything I've
00:51:09.560 said I've said before here's the new
00:51:10.960 point I hate to even bring it up
00:51:14.840 because it's sort of devastating you
00:51:18.920 know all the all of the pushback that
00:51:21.900 Trump got with the so-called Muslim
00:51:24.080 ban right so the Muslim ban which is
00:51:28.620 what his critics called it he was
00:51:31.700 accused of just not letting people in
00:51:34.280 because they were different religion
00:51:36.240 or ethnicity or whatever religion
00:51:38.560 mostly so he was accused of being
00:51:40.420 anti-Muslim he's expanded the number of
00:51:43.480 countries and I don't think they're all
00:51:45.300 majority Muslim countries but he's
00:51:47.400 expanded them all and so he's you know
00:51:50.380 it brings up that issue again all right
00:51:52.700 so one of the big the president's biggest
00:51:55.100 problems was that it appeared that he
00:51:58.280 was blocking people from coming into the
00:52:00.380 country just because they were Muslim
00:52:02.280 that was that's what the critic said
00:52:04.740 it's not what was actually happening but
00:52:06.760 that's what the critic said he had a he
00:52:09.860 had a play with this corona coronavirus to
00:52:13.500 absolve himself and he didn't take it it's
00:52:17.980 one of the biggest miss opportunities you'll
00:52:19.840 ever see now let me connect the dots because
00:52:22.500 so far you don't know what I'm talking
00:52:23.740 about probably the corona virus is almost
00:52:29.080 perfectly analogous to radical Islamic belief
00:52:35.080 not regular Islamic mainstream ordinary
00:52:38.820 Islamic religious person I'm talking
00:52:41.460 about just the radical ones who want to
00:52:43.420 kill people because the Muslim population
00:52:46.940 mostly innocent has a little bit of a
00:52:50.500 idea of virus in it that you could call the
00:52:54.060 radical terrorist element just a little bit
00:52:57.600 of a larger population has that problem
00:52:59.680 identical to big population of Chinese
00:53:04.320 nationalists or people who've been to China
00:53:06.360 almost all of them do not have the
00:53:09.100 coronavirus virus the vast majority of
00:53:12.340 ordinary Chinese travelers have no
00:53:15.180 coronavirus but a very small amount do and
00:53:20.000 we treated we treated the the Muslim country
00:53:26.100 ban as if we would treat all the people with
00:53:30.860 the same risk level simply because we can't
00:53:33.100 determine who are the dangerous ones we
00:53:35.540 classified the whole group as potentially
00:53:38.820 dangerous just because we can't tell the
00:53:40.600 individuals within it and then the corona virus
00:53:43.400 comes it's exactly analogous I mean there are
00:53:47.280 lots of difference and you know trade
00:53:49.960 agreements and our relationship and things
00:53:52.320 with China so they're big differences but
00:53:54.000 the way the human mind processes things is
00:53:58.340 that we see why is this different why is the
00:54:03.320 why is the why is the virus being treated
00:54:06.620 differently in terms of allowing people into
00:54:08.920 the country than the Muslim ban when in fact both
00:54:13.420 of those are large communities who are
00:54:15.160 overwhelmingly innocent of anything but just
00:54:18.200 a small amount are infected the Chinese
00:54:22.000 some of them with that virus the Muslim
00:54:25.780 countries that are banned just a few of them
00:54:28.100 with terrorism here's the problem makes it
00:54:33.900 look racist makes it look racist because if
00:54:38.800 you can't explain to me why those two
00:54:40.520 situations are treated differently where's my
00:54:43.200 mind going to go so people keep saying did
00:54:46.820 it it did something happen this morning
00:54:48.960 because I did not see a news report about
00:54:53.120 banning travel I saw only that we banned
00:54:56.700 travel to China so let's let's check it in
00:55:01.600 in any event it took too long so it doesn't
00:55:04.180 really change what happened I'm just looking
00:55:12.560 down I don't see it on the headline
00:55:15.020 yeah I don't see it as a headline someone
00:55:25.940 needs to catch up well I just looked at all
00:55:28.940 the CNN headlines and there's nothing there
00:55:30.800 about restricting incoming flights so mandatory
00:55:35.840 quarantines now let's let's do a fact check
00:55:38.280 on that my my larger point remains the same
00:55:41.180 because I have assumed all along that we
00:55:44.060 would reach a point where we had to stop the
00:55:46.360 flights so the fact that he stopped them does
00:55:49.180 not make it still not a gigantic error because
00:55:53.460 the error was waiting this long you know if if if the
00:55:57.500 virus takes off in this country it's just going to
00:56:00.200 look like the greatest political mistake of all
00:56:02.140 time but on a persuasion level he had a chance to
00:56:06.540 get rid of his biggest problem I would say Trump's
00:56:09.620 biggest problem was that so-called Muslim ban that
00:56:13.280 wasn't really a Muslim ban it was about a ban about
00:56:15.980 we don't know who in that group is going to be the
00:56:18.100 dangerous ones if he had done just exactly the same
00:56:21.020 thing with the virus people would say oh okay I get
00:56:23.920 it now I get it whenever there's a big group and you
00:56:27.800 can't tell which ones are the dangerous ones you
00:56:30.300 temporarily ban them all until you can sort things out
00:56:34.320 and figure out what's safe he could have treated both these
00:56:37.700 situations the same and it would have absolutely absolved
00:56:41.740 him at least to some people it would have absolved him from
00:56:47.040 the claim that the Muslim ban was about Muslims instead it goes the
00:56:50.920 other way what biggest one of the biggest mistakes I've ever
00:56:54.080 seen him make persuasion wise because it was free money that was
00:56:58.760 free money that the president should have just looked at that table full of
00:57:03.040 free money and said I'm just going to temporarily ban things I win on the
00:57:07.620 Muslim ban I win on being rough on China I win on being cautious and
00:57:12.780 protecting the country win win win win win win and he took the losing path I
00:57:18.280 can't explain it unless there's massive corruption somewhere in
00:57:22.300 it doesn't mean that it's Trump could be whoever's advising him could be
00:57:27.040 Congress Senate I don't know could be anybody but there's something corrupt
00:57:32.280 going on there all right somebody says it's already banned so I'm
00:57:38.460 going to go check the news it could there could be a reason that CNN does not
00:57:43.140 have that in the headlines you might I have to check because there's a little
00:57:49.140 confusion about what got banned so I'm not sure that those of you who are
00:57:53.700 saying that we've banned those flights might have only banned it in one
00:57:57.340 direction but let me check on that that's a it's an open question we'll go
00:58:01.000 check on that together and that's all I got for today see you tomorrow
00:58:05.040 so
00:58:09.440 you