Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 817 Scott Adams： Who REALLY Won in New Hampshire, New Stupid Attack on Trump

00:00:00.000 What time is it? Does anybody know what time it is? Let me check. Oh, it's time for the simultaneous sip. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams, DJ Dr. Funk Juice. You know what time it is. Yes, you do.

00:00:23.780 It's time for the simultaneous sip, and all you need is really not much. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen drink or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:39.200 And get ready for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's a beverage that is spewing hearts. I think, if I've got my left and right correct, hearts coming out of my cup. Look at that. Oh, cool illusion, eh? And get ready for the simultaneous sip. It happens now.

00:01:02.680 Hmm. Hmm. I realize if you're watching this on YouTube later, where we upload it or on podcast, what I said about the cup full of hearts makes no sense in your world. But remember, we're all watching two movies on one screen. So don't be surprised if what you see is different from what other people see.

00:01:27.620 So, in no particular order, you know that gigantic story about the anti-Trump guy who tried to massacre a bunch of Trump volunteers? You know the thing that everybody's talking about? It's a gigantic story. I mean, why wouldn't it be? There's somebody who tried to massacre a bunch of Trump supporters. Oh, wait, it's not a national story. It's kind of a little blip.

00:01:55.200 Sure, sure, it was mentioned. The guy that got lost in the wash. That's right. There's somebody who tried to murder Trump supporters. Didn't try to kill a leader. Tried to kill ordinary voters who were just registering people to vote. They weren't causing trouble.

00:02:18.080 So that's where the rhetoric against Trump supporters. Somebody actually tried to kill them. Amazing. We'll get to New Hampshire. I'm just letting people pile in here. My favorite pundit, and I say favorite because he's so absurd, is this Stephen Collins guy who writes an anti-Trump article for CNN.com just about every day.

00:02:48.080 And here's how he's trying to create the newest frame in which people can find a way to hate Trump because they're running out of ways. It's like, oh, he's colluding with the Russians. Okay, he's not. He did something terribly impeachable. Okay, it wasn't that impeachable. It was, you know, closer to a perfect letter than impeachable.

00:03:09.840 So they're desperately cycling through. Well, he doesn't seem like he's actually insane. So here's what they've lit on. And you can see that Stephen Collins is sort of, I think, maybe testing the water with this.

00:03:26.240 So here's the approach. A quote from his article. The sudden storm over Stone, so talking about Roger Stone and possible pardon, triggered by an early hours tweet by the president is part of an accelerated pattern of unmoderated behavior since Trump was found not guilty of impeachable, wait, of impeachable offenses.

00:03:48.240 Wait a minute. He was found not guilty of impeachable offenses? That's a wrong sentence, isn't it? Wasn't he found not guilty?

00:04:00.100 If they were impeachable offenses, that would suggest that it was just a mistake and he was actually guilty. I like how you sort of stick that in there so you uncritically read it as though it was a travesty of justice.

00:04:16.740 Yeah, so there were impeachable defenses, but inexplicably he wasn't impeached. How do you explain it? It's hard to explain.

00:04:23.340 Anyway, so some of whom express the hope that the scar of impeachment, the scar of impeachment, the red letter I that's now burned on his chest, he will forever suffer the scar of impeachment.

00:04:42.640 I haven't noticed. I haven't noticed. It must be like a little scar that's maybe underneath his arm here where you don't see it. I mean, there might be a scar of impeachment on Trump, but I haven't seen it yet. It must be very small and covered with clothing.

00:05:01.120 But anyway, it looks like the new attack against Trump is that he's unleashed. He's going to be, no longer can his dictatorial impulses be controlled. He can't be controlled. He's Godzilla. No, he can't be Godzilla. Somebody else is Godzilla.

00:05:21.600 So it feels like not the strongest attack because it, I don't know, it just doesn't ring true. But they're trying desperately to find something that connects as a criticism.

00:05:35.100 All right, one of the big stories from last night is that Yang is out. Andrew Yang has dropped out of the race, did not really get the support that he needed to continue.

00:05:47.180 But I would like to join all of you in thanking Andrew Yang. And I think most of you would agree with this. I think he made the race better. I think he made the conversation in the United States about the topics that he was pushing, UBI, robots are coming for your jobs, etc.

00:06:07.260 I think he added real, genuine, which is the same as real. He really upgraded the conversation. Now, he didn't quite make it to the final three, but he certainly changed the conversation.

00:06:24.940 And I think it might be a permanent kind of shift in our thinking. And he was fun. He was great for Asian Americans because he got as far as he did.

00:06:35.340 So everything about him was good. It was a very positive experience. So thank you, Andrew Yang, for being a good American. A great American. One of the best. So thanks for that.

00:06:48.460 One of the things that one of my Twitter friends noted is that he had a little program that I was not aware of.

00:06:56.620 And I thought I'd give it a shout out because it was interesting. It was basically a student exchange program within the United States, which is not the worst idea I've ever heard of.

00:07:08.780 So normally you do the student exchanges with other countries so that you both get a little flavor of what the other country is about.

00:07:16.320 It's good in the long run for, you know, peaceful relationships and understanding and all that.

00:07:21.100 But I guess Yang was suggesting that we do it within the United States so that people would get out of their little bubble of their neighborhood or their culture and see what it's like somewhere else.

00:07:30.400 It's actually a really good. That's a really good suggestion. Let's keep that one out there.

00:07:34.460 All right. So thanks, Andrew Yang. Let's talk about the the other candidates and where we're at.

00:07:44.140 Now, if I had to pick one variable that makes the most difference in who's going to win the presidency, I would say the economy.

00:07:54.320 Now, President Trump has a incredible lead in the economy, you know, meaning that he's an incumbent over one.

00:08:02.560 Well, well, maybe the best economy we've ever had. And sure, sure, you can say, oh, Obama had better stats and this or that, or it's just a continuation of Obama.

00:08:12.240 And people will say that. But still, when things are going well in the economy is a super strong indicator.

00:08:18.680 But the second big variable in a world of many variables, the two that stick out are the black vote and economics.

00:08:30.600 So if President Trump looked good on those two things, you'd have to look for some kind of a special situation to take him out.

00:08:40.840 Because those are the by far the two most commanding variables, not the only variables.

00:08:46.440 And there could be lots of surprises between now and Election Day.

00:08:50.320 But these are very predictive.

00:08:51.720 So let's look at how the other candidates look on those two variables and some others.

00:08:59.380 And let's talk about matchup.

00:09:01.880 What is Trump's biggest negative?

00:09:05.420 His biggest negative.

00:09:06.860 You could say there are two.

00:09:09.760 I'd say two of his biggest negatives are the deficit.

00:09:14.600 That Trump is not as good on reducing the deficit as even his own side would like.

00:09:22.220 And certainly, you know, the people who oppose him would use that as a club.

00:09:27.780 But he's running against people who are going to make the deficit worse.

00:09:31.480 And they're not even pretending that's not the case.

00:09:34.540 They're not even pretending.

00:09:36.320 If you look at Bernie Sanders, is he going to make the deficit better or worse?

00:09:40.560 Well, I think you know the answer to the question.

00:09:42.720 That's not even a political opinion.

00:09:45.300 I believe Sanders would probably say the same thing I'm saying, which is, yeah, you know,

00:09:50.380 this stuff is more expensive than what we're doing now.

00:09:53.800 So, of course, it's going to make the deficit go up.

00:09:55.660 So, even if you increase taxes a lot, most people think the deficit is going to go up under Sanders.

00:10:05.440 So, I think President Trump's biggest weakness, one of them, the deficit, the Democrats can't use.

00:10:13.560 It's off the table.

00:10:14.420 It's his biggest flaw that's not about his personality, you know, his personal style.

00:10:20.180 But his biggest flaw that's on policy, they got nobody.

00:10:25.340 They got nobody who's going to do anything.

00:10:27.380 Now, maybe, you know, maybe when Bloomberg gets into the race, you know, in the actual voting part of the race,

00:10:38.380 maybe it would look different.

00:10:40.000 But even he's looking to reduce, you know, to be very aggressive on climate change.

00:10:45.660 It's hard to imagine that anybody who's going to be super aggressive on climate change is also going to be good for the deficit.

00:10:53.800 So, they got nothing against him on the deficit.

00:10:56.460 He's completely free from that criticism, essentially.

00:11:01.160 And what about the black vote?

00:11:04.080 We'll go through each of the candidates and talk about that.

00:11:07.100 I think that's the other biggest thing.

00:11:10.540 So, I saw on some blog that black support for Bernie plunged to 8%.

00:11:17.380 What? 8%?

00:11:21.500 Now, I don't know how they measure such things.

00:11:24.100 Because if 8% is just the share he got from, you know, the other Democrats,

00:11:29.320 I don't know if it means the same as if you were running in the general election,

00:11:33.460 he's obviously going to get more than 8% black support.

00:11:35.900 But the real thing is that it looks like it reduced by half recently.

00:11:43.500 Now, I'm not sure if you can trust the statistics on any of this stuff yet,

00:11:47.760 the way they ask the questions, the earliness of it all, that sort of thing.

00:11:51.220 But it does seem like Sanders does not have some advantage with the black vote.

00:11:59.080 So, that would be advantage Trump, because Trump has an actual track record in office

00:12:03.540 that even Democrats say, oh, I've got to admit, that's pretty good for the black community.

00:12:08.860 Everything from supporting the historically black colleges, prison reform, enterprise zones,

00:12:17.460 and good employment rates.

00:12:20.520 And I don't think you can underestimate how important it is

00:12:25.380 that Trump talks about benefiting the black community more than anybody.

00:12:31.000 Am I wrong about that?

00:12:32.720 If you were to just look at all the things that people say,

00:12:37.500 all of the Democrats collectively or individually,

00:12:40.420 and then look at all the things that President Trump says,

00:12:43.920 which of them talks more about benefiting the black community in this country?

00:12:51.180 I think it's Trump 10 to 1.

00:12:54.820 I don't think it's even close.

00:12:56.800 Name the other big policy that any of the Democrats have

00:13:00.280 for helping the black community.

00:13:03.620 Um, nothing?

00:13:07.240 Am I wrong that I can't think of one?

00:13:09.660 I can't think of a single Democratic candidate,

00:13:13.120 and there are so many of them,

00:13:14.540 who have a policy that I would identify as,

00:13:17.280 oh, yeah, that's clearly, you know,

00:13:19.360 designed for the benefit of the black community.

00:13:22.940 I don't, I think, I think Trump is actually saying the most,

00:13:27.340 as well as, oh, somebody said Steyer,

00:13:29.840 and, um, and reparations.

00:13:32.900 But I don't know if anybody takes that seriously, do they?

00:13:36.340 Do you think there are too many black voters who think,

00:13:39.680 yeah, I'm going to get me some reparations?

00:13:42.220 I don't think anybody thinks that's real.

00:13:44.940 That's more of a talking thing.

00:13:48.400 Anyway, so I think, uh,

00:13:50.520 Bernie's got a problem there with the black vote.

00:13:52.860 Lloyd Blankenfein, ex-Goldman Sachs CEO,

00:13:58.620 was tweeting this.

00:14:00.420 And this is important because he's a rich Democrat, right?

00:14:04.620 He's a rich non-Trump supporter.

00:14:08.260 So a rich Democrat, one of the richest,

00:14:11.520 says in a tweet,

00:14:12.520 if Dems go on to nominate Sanders,

00:14:15.400 the Russians will have to reconsider who to work for 0.88

00:14:18.420 to best screw up the U.S., he tweeted.

00:14:23.120 Uh, um,

00:14:24.500 and then he said, uh,

00:14:26.400 Sanders is just as polarizing as Trump,

00:14:28.860 and he'll ruin our economy, 0.67

00:14:30.820 and doesn't care about our military.

00:14:33.480 If I'm Russian,

00:14:34.640 I go with Sanders this time around.

00:14:38.160 What about,

00:14:39.000 I mean,

00:14:41.900 right?

00:14:43.460 And this is a Democrat saying that.

00:14:45.860 And I've got a feeling that rich people,

00:14:48.060 what they're maybe really worried about

00:14:50.160 is their taxes and their economic situation.

00:14:53.020 But that's a pretty strong broadside

00:14:56.500 from a rich Democrat,

00:14:58.520 and I've got to think there are other rich Democrats

00:15:01.060 who have the same opinion.

00:15:03.020 Now, if,

00:15:04.020 let's say one of the,

00:15:05.020 uh,

00:15:05.320 the Bernie or one of the super socialists,

00:15:07.820 the ones who are more socialist,

00:15:10.540 gets nominated.

00:15:12.200 There's a gigantic attack vector there.

00:15:16.080 I don't even know if that makes sense.

00:15:17.720 An attack vector?

00:15:19.480 Let's assume that made sense.

00:15:21.340 That Trump has available to him

00:15:23.320 that he hasn't really busted out yet.

00:15:25.640 Could be he's just waiting for the right time

00:15:27.620 to take out the Gatlin gun.

00:15:30.120 But,

00:15:31.000 and it goes like this,

00:15:32.500 and I've told you this before.

00:15:33.460 When the economy is working really,

00:15:35.820 really well,

00:15:37.000 as it is in the opinion of most citizens

00:15:39.540 right now,

00:15:40.900 you don't add risk.

00:15:42.860 You don't completely change something

00:15:44.560 that's working well,

00:15:45.780 and that's what Bernie and Elizabeth Warren

00:15:48.300 and the other socialist-leaning ones

00:15:50.180 want to do.

00:15:51.680 Trump has not tried to doubt that argument yet,

00:15:55.380 that you don't break something

00:15:56.700 that isn't broken,

00:15:58.080 or you don't fix something

00:15:59.240 that isn't broken.

00:16:00.020 And when he does,

00:16:01.980 that's sort of the end of it,

00:16:03.540 because older people are the voters,

00:16:05.700 more so than the young.

00:16:07.820 Bernie seems to have captured

00:16:09.660 the support of all the people

00:16:11.880 who are least likely to vote.

00:16:15.040 The youth,

00:16:16.400 people who are young

00:16:17.340 and don't have health care.

00:16:19.280 I think they're the least likely to vote.

00:16:21.680 Can somebody fact-check that?

00:16:24.660 Whereas Trump has a natural constituency,

00:16:28.020 even more so than ever,

00:16:30.640 of people who just say,

00:16:32.280 okay, I'm old,

00:16:33.380 don't rock the boat,

00:16:34.480 things are going okay.

00:16:36.840 Trump owns the

00:16:38.260 things are going okay,

00:16:39.500 let's not change it group,

00:16:40.880 and that's all the seniors.

00:16:43.180 So,

00:16:43.940 good job Bernie

00:16:45.860 in getting such vocal support

00:16:48.540 from people who probably

00:16:49.540 don't vote that much.

00:16:51.020 That's going to cost him.

00:16:52.140 All right.

00:16:56.260 Bernie Sanders hired a band

00:16:58.480 for his last campaign event.

00:17:02.000 The name of the band,

00:17:03.400 and I'm not making this up,

00:17:05.980 what are the odds

00:17:06.900 that Bernie Sanders

00:17:08.280 would hire a band

00:17:09.740 to perform at his event,

00:17:11.800 and the name of the band

00:17:12.860 would be

00:17:13.520 The Strokes?

00:17:16.920 Come on.

00:17:17.960 One of two things

00:17:20.980 is possible.

00:17:22.100 Either the person

00:17:22.920 that I named

00:17:23.560 The Mole

00:17:24.280 is working for Bernie,

00:17:26.440 meaning secretly

00:17:27.460 giving him bad advice

00:17:28.800 and doing all the wrong things

00:17:30.440 in his social media.

00:17:31.880 I don't think

00:17:32.500 such a person

00:17:33.100 really exists,

00:17:33.920 but it's fun

00:17:34.380 to think about it.

00:17:35.360 Because when you see him

00:17:36.340 do stuff like this,

00:17:37.140 you say to yourself,

00:17:38.300 that looks more

00:17:39.900 like a prank

00:17:41.420 than an actual thing

00:17:43.680 that would just happen

00:17:44.420 naturally.

00:17:45.340 Now, of course,

00:17:45.800 it's a world full of coincidences,

00:17:47.600 as I tell you often,

00:17:48.840 and so if I had to guess,

00:17:50.020 of course,

00:17:50.400 it's just a coincidence.

00:17:51.960 But I think somebody

00:17:54.560 should have maybe said,

00:17:55.900 Bernie,

00:17:56.980 maybe we should not

00:17:58.840 associate with strokes.

00:18:02.160 Now, Bernie didn't have a stroke,

00:18:04.280 but you still think

00:18:05.140 of this cardiovascular system

00:18:07.040 as all one thing.

00:18:08.180 It sort of blends together

00:18:10.120 in people's minds

00:18:11.020 and reminds you

00:18:12.540 of his mortality.

00:18:15.800 People are all excited

00:18:16.660 about Buttigieg

00:18:17.740 because he has

00:18:20.280 so much support

00:18:21.020 and he's finished

00:18:22.500 one or two

00:18:23.160 in the first two events.

00:18:26.680 So, hey,

00:18:27.540 it's going to be all him, right?

00:18:29.320 Except that

00:18:30.100 we're going to run

00:18:31.380 into the states

00:18:32.680 that have an actual

00:18:33.660 minority population

00:18:35.000 for the first time.

00:18:36.900 And he's sort of

00:18:38.320 done already.

00:18:39.460 So I would say

00:18:40.080 that Buttigieg

00:18:40.640 is probably

00:18:41.760 90% certain,

00:18:44.720 I would say.

00:18:45.640 He's probably

00:18:46.280 a dead man walking

00:18:47.240 in terms of politics

00:18:49.140 because I think

00:18:50.200 as soon as he hits

00:18:50.960 the minority vote,

00:18:52.420 you're going to see

00:18:53.520 his strength

00:18:54.640 just evaporate.

00:18:56.340 So that's my prediction.

00:18:57.420 So I think

00:18:57.800 his ride

00:18:59.680 was exciting,

00:19:00.720 but he's sort of

00:19:01.660 closer to the end

00:19:03.120 of his ride

00:19:03.680 than the beginning.

00:19:06.140 Of course,

00:19:07.120 we need to talk

00:19:07.840 about

00:19:08.320 Biden.

00:19:10.360 So there are

00:19:13.240 two views

00:19:13.680 on Biden.

00:19:14.300 One is that

00:19:14.800 he had this

00:19:15.260 clever strategy

00:19:16.280 where he would

00:19:17.160 lose the first

00:19:17.840 two events,

00:19:18.860 but then he would

00:19:19.440 come back strong

00:19:20.340 once the states

00:19:22.660 with a bigger

00:19:23.120 minority population

00:19:24.180 were voting.

00:19:25.440 But it looks like

00:19:26.000 his support

00:19:27.000 has cratered.

00:19:29.100 And I think

00:19:30.220 that the first

00:19:31.260 two outcomes,

00:19:35.000 as somebody smart

00:19:36.100 once said,

00:19:37.340 black people

00:19:38.340 watch the news too.

00:19:39.340 It's one of those

00:19:42.000 dumb ideas.

00:19:44.140 And somebody said,

00:19:45.200 if you're a black

00:19:46.740 supporter of Biden,

00:19:48.660 let's say you've

00:19:49.120 been supporting him

00:19:50.000 when you answered

00:19:51.220 the pollsters

00:19:52.680 up until now,

00:19:54.580 you had your

00:19:55.420 television on

00:19:56.280 or you heard the

00:19:58.280 news one way

00:19:59.020 or another,

00:19:59.700 you saw the news

00:20:00.840 and you saw that

00:20:02.540 Joe Biden

00:20:03.620 doesn't have

00:20:04.300 white support.

00:20:05.920 He doesn't have

00:20:06.680 white support.

00:20:07.940 So if you're a

00:20:08.780 black supporter,

00:20:09.340 are you going to

00:20:11.300 climb on a horse

00:20:12.080 that doesn't have

00:20:12.680 white support

00:20:13.480 in the United

00:20:14.160 States?

00:20:15.500 That's sort of

00:20:16.460 a problem.

00:20:18.760 So I think

00:20:19.780 the rational

00:20:21.740 black voters

00:20:22.460 who are paying

00:20:23.000 attention are

00:20:24.080 saying,

00:20:24.580 I think I'd

00:20:26.560 rather be with

00:20:27.460 somebody who

00:20:28.500 could get a

00:20:29.140 white vote

00:20:30.160 because I'm

00:20:31.360 going to meet

00:20:31.740 a few of those

00:20:32.540 if I want to

00:20:33.440 be on the

00:20:34.220 winning team.

00:20:34.700 so I would

00:20:36.880 agree with

00:20:37.400 the pundits

00:20:38.740 who are now

00:20:39.160 saying that

00:20:39.640 Biden is

00:20:40.280 completely done

00:20:41.180 and it's

00:20:41.640 just a matter

00:20:42.320 of time

00:20:42.680 before he

00:20:43.200 finds the

00:20:43.840 most graceful

00:20:44.500 way to

00:20:44.880 make his

00:20:45.920 exit.

00:20:46.660 Now I would

00:20:47.260 like to claim

00:20:47.940 partial credit

00:20:49.140 for predicting

00:20:50.080 how many

00:20:51.520 people,

00:20:52.380 I think a lot

00:20:53.220 of you were

00:20:53.620 with me here,

00:20:54.560 how many

00:20:54.960 people from

00:20:56.100 the very

00:20:56.540 beginning when

00:20:57.480 Biden was

00:20:58.100 the overwhelming

00:20:58.840 polling favorite,

00:21:01.560 how many

00:21:02.000 people said

00:21:02.720 as clearly

00:21:03.380 as I did

00:21:04.040 he's not

00:21:04.960 going to

00:21:05.160 make it

00:21:05.440 to the

00:21:05.700 nomination?

00:21:08.000 I've been

00:21:08.560 saying that

00:21:08.960 since the

00:21:09.300 beginning and

00:21:09.800 it was

00:21:10.000 because he

00:21:10.480 would falter,

00:21:11.200 he just

00:21:11.440 doesn't,

00:21:12.660 there's just

00:21:13.140 not enough

00:21:13.620 left of him

00:21:14.360 unfortunately,

00:21:15.240 age has

00:21:16.020 taken its

00:21:16.480 toll.

00:21:18.340 So now I

00:21:19.180 got the

00:21:19.560 Kamala Harris

00:21:20.160 thing completely

00:21:20.820 wrong,

00:21:21.200 so I

00:21:22.200 don't want

00:21:22.440 to brag

00:21:22.800 too much

00:21:23.380 about the

00:21:24.320 Biden part

00:21:24.940 and if

00:21:26.320 Biden is

00:21:26.780 completely out

00:21:27.400 which I

00:21:27.920 assume will

00:21:28.320 be the

00:21:28.580 case,

00:21:30.640 alas,

00:21:32.240 I suppose

00:21:32.880 he could

00:21:33.160 throw a

00:21:33.500 Hail Mary

00:21:33.940 and say

00:21:34.380 you know,

00:21:35.200 let me

00:21:35.680 tell you

00:21:36.000 who my

00:21:36.300 vice

00:21:36.540 president

00:21:36.880 would be

00:21:37.380 and look

00:21:37.920 at me

00:21:38.140 again.

00:21:38.940 So he

00:21:39.380 does have

00:21:39.780 that play

00:21:40.340 to name

00:21:41.780 a vice

00:21:42.100 president,

00:21:42.620 but we

00:21:42.820 haven't

00:21:43.040 seen that

00:21:43.400 play ever

00:21:43.800 work for

00:21:44.460 anybody,

00:21:44.980 so I

00:21:45.780 think Biden's

00:21:46.280 done.

00:21:48.660 Let's

00:21:49.100 talk about

00:21:49.460 Klobuchar.

00:21:51.200 Klobuchar

00:21:52.260 in my

00:21:53.420 opinion is

00:21:54.020 the big

00:21:54.420 winner and

00:21:55.820 I saw

00:21:56.420 some people

00:21:56.940 mocking the

00:21:59.260 idea that

00:21:59.820 she was the

00:22:00.360 big winner

00:22:00.760 because she

00:22:01.160 came in

00:22:01.480 third.

00:22:03.080 She came

00:22:03.660 in third.

00:22:04.660 How can

00:22:05.180 you be the

00:22:05.640 big winner

00:22:06.180 if two

00:22:07.280 people just

00:22:07.800 kicked your 0.96

00:22:08.420 butt and

00:22:09.300 came in

00:22:09.680 first and

00:22:10.080 second?

00:22:10.860 And the

00:22:11.220 answer is

00:22:11.640 this,

00:22:12.320 how many

00:22:13.000 times have

00:22:13.500 I told

00:22:13.880 you that

00:22:15.360 the direction

00:22:16.000 of things

00:22:16.600 matters more

00:22:17.380 than where

00:22:17.800 things are?

00:22:18.440 Where

00:22:19.500 things are

00:22:20.320 is that

00:22:21.540 Biden and

00:22:22.160 Buttigieg

00:22:22.640 just were

00:22:23.540 the two

00:22:24.080 highest vote

00:22:24.840 getters in

00:22:25.360 two events

00:22:25.840 in a row.

00:22:26.940 That's where

00:22:27.560 we are.

00:22:29.320 But where

00:22:29.760 are we

00:22:30.020 heading?

00:22:31.580 That's the

00:22:32.180 Klobuchar

00:22:32.560 story.

00:22:33.500 The Klobuchar 1.00

00:22:34.020 story is

00:22:34.820 that she

00:22:36.060 just got a

00:22:37.300 huge boost

00:22:38.120 and enough

00:22:40.160 so that she's

00:22:40.860 in the

00:22:41.100 serious competition,

00:22:42.680 enough people

00:22:43.240 are paying

00:22:43.600 attention.

00:22:44.860 Her finish 1.00

00:22:45.820 should make

00:22:46.400 all the people

00:22:46.980 who didn't

00:22:47.820 pay attention

00:22:48.340 to her

00:22:48.760 before

00:22:49.260 start paying

00:22:50.480 attention to

00:22:51.080 her.

00:22:51.600 But there's

00:22:52.080 a really

00:22:52.360 interesting

00:22:52.820 part of

00:22:53.900 the story.

00:22:55.820 Now,

00:22:56.560 if you

00:22:57.200 read my

00:22:57.640 book,

00:22:58.220 Winn

00:22:58.400 Bigley,

00:22:59.280 many of

00:22:59.780 you have,

00:23:00.920 you know

00:23:01.380 that sometimes

00:23:02.040 it's impossible

00:23:03.060 to tell

00:23:03.780 when something

00:23:05.660 happens by

00:23:06.220 coincidence

00:23:06.740 versus when

00:23:07.720 it has been

00:23:08.200 influenced by

00:23:09.180 some event.

00:23:10.360 You can't

00:23:10.640 really tell.

00:23:11.660 And so this

00:23:12.060 is part of

00:23:12.480 the fun.

00:23:14.160 It turns

00:23:14.760 out that

00:23:16.180 if you

00:23:17.400 looked at

00:23:17.740 the signs

00:23:18.360 her supporters,

00:23:19.360 Klobuchar's

00:23:19.960 supporters were

00:23:20.880 holding behind

00:23:21.560 her when she

00:23:22.020 gave her

00:23:22.360 speech,

00:23:23.660 I guess

00:23:24.740 they've

00:23:25.040 picked the

00:23:25.460 slogan,

00:23:26.780 Win

00:23:26.980 Big.

00:23:29.020 Win

00:23:29.620 Big.

00:23:31.900 That's the

00:23:32.660 Klobuchar

00:23:33.060 slogan.

00:23:36.340 Now,

00:23:37.400 Win

00:23:37.600 Bigley

00:23:38.080 comes loosely

00:23:40.280 from President

00:23:41.060 Trump.

00:23:42.040 Now,

00:23:42.380 I believe he

00:23:42.960 was saying

00:23:43.460 Win

00:23:43.920 Big

00:23:44.400 Liga,

00:23:46.500 but it

00:23:46.860 sounds like

00:23:47.360 Win

00:23:47.880 Bigley,

00:23:48.720 and so I

00:23:49.400 use that

00:23:49.880 humorously as

00:23:51.640 my book

00:23:52.020 title,

00:23:52.980 as if he

00:23:54.080 had been

00:23:54.420 saying

00:23:54.780 Bigley,

00:23:55.820 although

00:23:56.260 lately I

00:23:56.940 think he

00:23:57.180 does say

00:23:57.540 Bigley,

00:23:57.960 but that's

00:23:58.260 another story.

00:23:59.700 So here's,

00:24:00.640 and I've

00:24:01.420 told you

00:24:01.720 before,

00:24:02.940 now this

00:24:03.460 isn't the

00:24:03.900 first time

00:24:04.340 you're going

00:24:04.580 to hear

00:24:04.760 this.

00:24:05.180 If this

00:24:05.520 were the

00:24:05.920 first time

00:24:06.560 I ever

00:24:06.900 said what

00:24:07.320 I'm going

00:24:07.560 to say

00:24:07.800 now,

00:24:08.980 it would

00:24:09.300 sound a little,

00:24:09.980 you'd be a

00:24:10.400 little skeptical.

00:24:10.880 But I've

00:24:12.120 been saying

00:24:12.460 this for a

00:24:12.900 while.

00:24:13.660 I tell you

00:24:14.260 that one

00:24:14.780 of the

00:24:14.980 ways that

00:24:15.400 I trace

00:24:15.900 my own

00:24:16.640 persuasion

00:24:17.500 is by

00:24:18.800 choice of

00:24:19.360 words.

00:24:19.940 When you

00:24:20.480 see an

00:24:20.780 unusual

00:24:21.180 choice of

00:24:21.780 words migrate

00:24:23.140 from the

00:24:25.040 things I've

00:24:25.540 said or

00:24:26.020 written into

00:24:27.320 other people's

00:24:28.080 mouths or

00:24:28.680 their

00:24:28.940 presentation,

00:24:30.280 it doesn't

00:24:31.220 necessarily mean

00:24:32.360 that you

00:24:32.640 influence them,

00:24:33.940 but it's a

00:24:34.420 flag.

00:24:36.200 It's a

00:24:36.920 little signal.

00:24:37.560 And so

00:24:39.080 I say

00:24:40.000 it's very

00:24:40.940 interesting.

00:24:41.620 I wrote a

00:24:42.140 book with

00:24:43.640 all of the

00:24:44.280 best persuasion

00:24:45.200 techniques that

00:24:46.240 President Trump

00:24:46.940 used to win,

00:24:48.300 and it

00:24:48.960 becomes sort

00:24:49.560 of a manual

00:24:50.360 that any

00:24:50.920 candidate could

00:24:51.780 read to

00:24:53.040 improve their

00:24:53.840 persuasion.

00:24:55.540 And then I

00:24:56.220 see that

00:24:56.700 something very

00:24:57.480 close to the

00:24:58.160 title of my

00:24:58.740 book just

00:25:00.200 appeared on

00:25:00.700 the signs.

00:25:01.560 Now, I'm

00:25:02.080 not making

00:25:02.540 any claim that

00:25:03.220 they made

00:25:03.580 the signs

00:25:04.120 because of

00:25:05.000 my book.

00:25:05.500 at least

00:25:07.400 consciously.

00:25:09.220 Let me ask

00:25:10.000 you this.

00:25:11.300 Do you

00:25:11.640 think there's

00:25:12.140 anybody in

00:25:13.000 the Democratic

00:25:14.020 campaigns,

00:25:14.960 let's say

00:25:15.360 their campaign

00:25:15.940 staffs,

00:25:16.980 do you think

00:25:17.420 that any of

00:25:18.020 the Democrats

00:25:18.760 have anybody

00:25:20.240 on their

00:25:20.680 staffs who

00:25:22.340 have ever

00:25:22.720 read the

00:25:24.200 one book

00:25:24.780 that is

00:25:25.640 biased

00:25:26.040 design,

00:25:26.740 the most

00:25:27.040 helpful book

00:25:27.800 any of them

00:25:28.400 could read

00:25:28.960 for improving

00:25:30.200 their communication,

00:25:31.280 which is all

00:25:31.680 they're doing.

00:25:32.220 They're not

00:25:32.580 governing,

00:25:33.380 they're

00:25:33.800 communicating.

00:25:34.300 a campaign

00:25:35.460 is nothing

00:25:35.880 but,

00:25:36.480 well,

00:25:36.660 it's mostly

00:25:37.060 communicating

00:25:37.700 with a little

00:25:38.200 bit of

00:25:38.480 organization

00:25:39.020 in there.

00:25:41.000 So,

00:25:41.680 what are

00:25:42.360 the odds

00:25:42.820 that a

00:25:43.680 best-selling

00:25:44.160 book that

00:25:45.200 tells you

00:25:45.540 the best

00:25:45.900 way to

00:25:46.200 communicate

00:25:46.660 in a

00:25:47.740 political

00:25:48.100 context

00:25:48.820 would be

00:25:49.880 read by

00:25:50.300 people who

00:25:50.760 do that

00:25:51.060 for a

00:25:51.320 living

00:25:51.540 and read

00:25:52.460 books?

00:25:53.320 Pretty

00:25:53.820 well.

00:25:54.700 There's

00:25:55.000 a pretty

00:25:55.180 good chance

00:25:55.600 that some

00:25:56.140 of them

00:25:56.440 are familiar

00:25:57.340 with the

00:25:57.700 book.

00:25:59.060 But,

00:25:59.860 if it

00:26:00.680 were true

00:26:01.140 that

00:26:01.520 Klobuchar

00:26:02.120 had been

00:26:03.060 influenced,

00:26:04.620 or let's

00:26:05.120 say she

00:26:05.680 improved her

00:26:06.900 game by

00:26:07.320 reading my

00:26:07.760 book,

00:26:08.060 and I'm

00:26:08.260 not saying

00:26:08.580 that's the

00:26:08.960 case.

00:26:10.020 I'm saying

00:26:10.500 here's what

00:26:11.160 you would

00:26:11.440 look for.

00:26:12.900 What you

00:26:13.480 would look

00:26:13.840 for is

00:26:14.640 that the

00:26:15.000 technique in

00:26:15.640 the book

00:26:15.980 would start

00:26:16.420 coming out

00:26:17.020 in her

00:26:17.920 presentation

00:26:18.960 stronger than

00:26:20.740 you've seen

00:26:21.200 it before.

00:26:23.080 Did any of

00:26:23.860 you catch

00:26:24.280 her semi-victory

00:26:26.380 speech last

00:26:27.080 night in which

00:26:27.680 she was claiming

00:26:28.400 victory for coming

00:26:29.280 in third?

00:26:30.380 Did anybody

00:26:31.120 see that?

00:26:35.360 Somebody's

00:26:35.800 asking me if

00:26:36.380 I'm secretly

00:26:37.040 consulting

00:26:37.840 Klobuchar.

00:26:38.520 I'm not.

00:26:39.600 And I

00:26:40.000 wouldn't lie

00:26:40.360 to you about

00:26:40.740 that.

00:26:41.340 I would not

00:26:42.000 look you in

00:26:43.340 the eyes and

00:26:43.800 say I

00:26:44.280 have not

00:26:44.840 if I were

00:26:46.300 even doing

00:26:46.780 a little bit

00:26:47.840 or indirectly

00:26:48.520 or in any

00:26:49.040 way.

00:26:49.220 I'm not.

00:26:50.560 Nor am I

00:26:51.420 advising any

00:26:52.300 Democrat.

00:26:53.020 That's not

00:26:53.420 happening.

00:26:55.820 But if

00:26:56.760 you heard

00:26:57.220 her speech

00:26:58.000 speech, she 0.94

00:26:59.900 started out

00:27:00.580 with a

00:27:01.680 super visual

00:27:02.740 and emotional

00:27:03.680 story about

00:27:04.880 her grandparents,

00:27:06.220 you know,

00:27:06.480 coal miner,

00:27:07.800 you know,

00:27:08.420 picking up

00:27:09.600 his sister

00:27:10.200 from adoption

00:27:12.600 agency because

00:27:13.540 he had to

00:27:13.920 work when he

00:27:14.400 was a kid

00:27:14.960 and then

00:27:16.000 they worked

00:27:16.460 their way

00:27:16.800 up and

00:27:17.240 it was the

00:27:17.720 American dream,

00:27:18.680 et cetera.

00:27:19.720 And that

00:27:21.080 was a

00:27:21.540 super visual,

00:27:23.300 yeah, it

00:27:24.760 was a super

00:27:25.400 visual and

00:27:26.800 emotional

00:27:27.380 story.

00:27:29.640 What did

00:27:30.360 Van Jones

00:27:31.060 call out

00:27:31.660 after

00:27:32.180 Klobuchar

00:27:33.520 gave that?

00:27:34.940 Van Jones,

00:27:35.760 who I often

00:27:36.420 tell you is

00:27:37.000 sort of the

00:27:37.460 one-eyed,

00:27:38.740 he's the

00:27:39.200 one-eyed

00:27:39.580 Democrat in

00:27:40.380 the land

00:27:40.720 of the

00:27:41.000 blind,

00:27:42.160 just listen

00:27:43.320 to what he

00:27:43.800 says and

00:27:45.400 you're going

00:27:45.700 to get a

00:27:46.160 clearer view

00:27:47.080 of the

00:27:47.540 field than

00:27:48.340 what any

00:27:48.820 of the

00:27:49.040 other

00:27:49.240 pundits

00:27:49.560 say.

00:27:49.840 It's very

00:27:50.160 consistent.

00:27:51.000 He does

00:27:51.240 it just

00:27:51.980 every time.

00:27:53.320 His opinion

00:27:53.920 is just a

00:27:54.520 little more

00:27:54.960 clear, a

00:27:56.360 little more

00:27:56.780 on point

00:27:57.320 than just

00:27:57.740 about

00:27:57.960 everybody

00:27:58.360 who's

00:27:59.000 talking

00:27:59.240 about

00:27:59.440 this

00:27:59.620 stuff.

00:28:00.860 And one

00:28:02.060 of the

00:28:02.260 things that

00:28:02.680 Van Jones

00:28:03.140 pointed out

00:28:03.860 is how

00:28:04.740 good she

00:28:06.060 was with

00:28:06.640 story.

00:28:07.960 And he

00:28:08.160 was kind

00:28:09.600 of blown

00:28:09.920 away a

00:28:10.320 little bit

00:28:10.760 by the

00:28:12.280 quality of

00:28:13.160 her speech.

00:28:14.280 Have you

00:28:14.640 ever heard

00:28:15.140 that before?

00:28:16.320 Has anybody

00:28:16.980 ever said

00:28:17.640 that Klobuchar, 0.96

00:28:19.280 man, she

00:28:19.820 can give a

00:28:20.880 speech that

00:28:21.700 touches your

00:28:22.700 heartstrings?

00:28:23.260 I've never

00:28:23.860 heard it.

00:28:24.840 I've never

00:28:25.240 heard anybody

00:28:25.760 say, man,

00:28:26.560 Klobuchar,

00:28:27.540 what a

00:28:28.280 orator.

00:28:29.580 Her speaking

00:28:30.360 moves me.

00:28:32.140 Never heard

00:28:32.800 it before.

00:28:34.040 And then she

00:28:34.520 walked up on

00:28:35.180 stage yesterday

00:28:35.980 and she just 0.97

00:28:37.640 nailed it.

00:28:39.060 I watched

00:28:39.900 just the first

00:28:41.080 part of the

00:28:41.420 speech live

00:28:42.280 and I was

00:28:43.140 sitting there

00:28:43.540 thinking,

00:28:44.340 am I

00:28:45.240 imagining this

00:28:46.140 or is this

00:28:47.340 really good?

00:28:48.860 And then I

00:28:49.500 started looking

00:28:50.200 for the visual

00:28:50.920 elements.

00:28:51.800 She talked

00:28:52.280 about the

00:28:52.640 grandmother

00:28:53.060 packing a

00:28:53.760 lunch.

00:28:54.820 You can

00:28:55.160 see it,

00:28:55.620 can't you?

00:28:56.300 You can

00:28:56.620 see the

00:28:56.940 grandmother.

00:28:57.820 You can

00:28:58.120 see her

00:28:58.400 packing the

00:28:58.900 lunch.

00:28:59.740 Then she

00:29:00.040 talked about

00:29:00.480 the coal

00:29:00.880 miner who

00:29:01.480 went down

00:29:02.420 in a cage

00:29:03.020 into the

00:29:03.380 mine.

00:29:04.180 You could

00:29:04.620 see it.

00:29:06.020 You could

00:29:06.500 feel it.

00:29:07.800 You were

00:29:08.140 in the

00:29:08.420 mine with

00:29:09.080 her

00:29:09.220 grandfather.

00:29:10.480 You could

00:29:10.840 see the

00:29:11.720 grandfather

00:29:12.180 borrowed a

00:29:12.940 car to

00:29:14.080 drive to

00:29:14.560 get his

00:29:15.100 sister who

00:29:15.620 had been

00:29:15.880 put in an

00:29:16.260 orphanage

00:29:16.820 because they

00:29:19.400 didn't have

00:29:19.680 enough money

00:29:20.120 for all their

00:29:20.520 kids.

00:29:21.280 You could

00:29:21.580 see him

00:29:22.540 borrowing the

00:29:23.080 car.

00:29:24.000 You could

00:29:24.380 see him

00:29:24.780 driving the

00:29:25.400 car.

00:29:25.640 You could

00:29:25.880 see him

00:29:26.260 driving back

00:29:26.840 with his

00:29:27.320 sister.

00:29:28.080 It was

00:29:28.460 amazingly

00:29:29.000 visual.

00:29:30.480 So look

00:29:30.780 for that.

00:29:31.680 If it's

00:29:32.100 true, and

00:29:32.840 I'm not

00:29:33.140 saying it

00:29:33.520 is, but

00:29:34.720 there are

00:29:35.080 certainly

00:29:35.720 some bread

00:29:36.200 crumbs here

00:29:36.780 that would

00:29:37.760 suggest that

00:29:38.360 somebody on

00:29:38.860 the

00:29:39.000 cloberture

00:29:39.540 campaign has

00:29:41.300 figured out

00:29:42.000 a way to

00:29:42.780 be a lot

00:29:43.580 more persuasive.

00:29:44.540 Now I

00:29:45.760 would say

00:29:46.100 that I've

00:29:47.260 called

00:29:47.540 cloberture's

00:29:48.420 technique the

00:29:49.780 tortoise versus

00:29:50.720 the hares.

00:29:51.820 The other

00:29:52.340 candidates are

00:29:52.980 the hares.

00:29:54.420 The hares are

00:29:55.760 running fast and

00:29:56.640 burning brightly

00:29:57.300 and winning the

00:29:58.480 early stuff.

00:30:00.760 But cloberture

00:30:01.540 just keeps

00:30:02.880 tortoising

00:30:03.720 along.

00:30:05.080 Hey, what's

00:30:06.220 today?

00:30:06.840 Took another

00:30:07.360 step today.

00:30:08.760 How are you

00:30:09.560 guys doing?

00:30:10.000 Flaming out?

00:30:11.000 Getting in

00:30:11.640 trouble?

00:30:12.080 Saying things you

00:30:12.860 shouldn't say.

00:30:13.540 I'm just

00:30:13.980 climbing along

00:30:15.000 like a little

00:30:15.880 tortoise.

00:30:16.500 Do, do, do.

00:30:17.460 You can try to

00:30:18.300 hit me, but my

00:30:19.120 shell will

00:30:19.680 reject your

00:30:21.320 stuff.

00:30:23.140 And she

00:30:24.700 simply didn't

00:30:25.300 make mistakes,

00:30:26.500 right?

00:30:27.820 I apologize

00:30:28.880 for all my

00:30:29.680 nasal problems

00:30:31.100 live here.

00:30:32.300 I've got some

00:30:32.920 surgery lined

00:30:33.820 up to

00:30:34.780 roto-root my 1.00

00:30:36.080 nasal cavities

00:30:37.660 and then I

00:30:38.040 should be fine

00:30:38.520 after a while.

00:30:40.560 But it

00:30:42.120 seems to me

00:30:42.760 that cloberture

00:30:44.040 by simply

00:30:44.800 not drawing

00:30:46.640 attacks and

00:30:48.080 not making

00:30:48.700 any obvious

00:30:49.400 mistakes is

00:30:51.320 starting to get

00:30:51.980 a second look.

00:30:52.740 So the

00:30:53.040 tortoise

00:30:53.520 strategy looks

00:30:56.140 kind of good.

00:30:57.620 It looks

00:30:57.980 pretty strong.

00:30:59.440 Now here's the

00:31:00.000 other interesting

00:31:00.520 thing about

00:31:01.020 it.

00:31:01.160 What's the

00:31:01.740 big complaint

00:31:02.480 about Trump?

00:31:04.340 Usually it's

00:31:05.040 about his

00:31:05.480 being mean,

00:31:06.500 right?

00:31:07.020 He's mean.

00:31:08.140 He's mean.

00:31:08.900 He's a big

00:31:09.180 old meanie.

00:31:09.640 Trump is

00:31:11.140 most associated

00:31:11.900 with New

00:31:12.380 York City

00:31:12.880 even though

00:31:13.320 he's moved

00:31:13.920 his place

00:31:14.440 of residence.

00:31:15.860 We think

00:31:16.180 of Trump

00:31:16.760 as a New

00:31:17.300 Yorker

00:31:17.760 with a

00:31:18.280 sort of

00:31:19.840 a New

00:31:20.980 Yorker

00:31:21.660 personality,

00:31:22.800 a little

00:31:23.140 tougher,

00:31:24.020 more in

00:31:24.360 your face.

00:31:26.180 And then

00:31:26.380 there's

00:31:26.560 Klobuchar

00:31:26.960 who is

00:31:28.120 associated

00:31:28.620 with

00:31:28.900 Minnesota.

00:31:31.360 What is

00:31:31.940 Minnesota

00:31:32.480 most famous

00:31:33.580 for among

00:31:34.360 all the

00:31:35.040 states

00:31:35.380 and the

00:31:36.140 Union?

00:31:38.040 Now if

00:31:38.500 you didn't

00:31:38.760 know this

00:31:39.140 I'd be

00:31:39.420 surprised.

00:31:40.840 Minnesota

00:31:41.420 produces

00:31:42.720 the nicest

00:31:43.500 people in

00:31:44.400 the universe.

00:31:45.600 I don't

00:31:46.180 know why.

00:31:47.420 It just

00:31:47.800 does.

00:31:48.560 There's

00:31:48.840 something about

00:31:49.380 Minnesota

00:31:49.800 that produces

00:31:50.520 nice people

00:31:51.200 fairly

00:31:52.280 consistently.

00:31:53.480 So she

00:31:53.880 comes from

00:31:54.340 literally the

00:31:55.560 nicest state

00:31:56.700 that produces

00:31:57.820 for whatever

00:31:58.440 reason the

00:31:59.080 nicest people

00:31:59.920 personality

00:32:00.560 wise

00:32:00.920 against

00:32:02.440 the Trump

00:32:03.660 personality

00:32:04.180 who's sort

00:32:04.740 of the New

00:32:05.100 York

00:32:05.300 personality.

00:32:06.220 That's an

00:32:06.740 interesting

00:32:07.100 matchup

00:32:07.700 because there's

00:32:08.780 a pendulum

00:32:09.540 effect.

00:32:10.900 People might

00:32:11.760 want a

00:32:12.240 fighter until

00:32:13.480 they get a

00:32:14.160 little tired

00:32:14.580 of the

00:32:14.900 fighter and

00:32:16.160 then maybe

00:32:16.700 they need

00:32:17.020 somebody nice

00:32:17.640 after a

00:32:18.020 while.

00:32:18.800 So there's

00:32:19.120 certainly a

00:32:20.120 longing for

00:32:20.980 niceness that

00:32:22.620 makes her a 1.00

00:32:23.340 good matchup.

00:32:24.760 I don't know

00:32:25.340 that you could

00:32:25.860 beat the

00:32:26.200 president by

00:32:26.840 being more

00:32:27.660 of whatever

00:32:29.500 he is.

00:32:30.520 By being

00:32:31.340 more attacking

00:32:32.440 than he is.

00:32:33.100 I don't know

00:32:33.600 that you can

00:32:34.140 I don't know

00:32:35.320 that you can

00:32:35.740 over attack.

00:32:37.700 No you

00:32:38.080 could over

00:32:38.480 attack.

00:32:38.940 I don't

00:32:39.260 know that

00:32:39.500 you could

00:32:39.680 beat Trump

00:32:40.120 by being

00:32:40.940 more like

00:32:41.420 Trump.

00:32:42.400 I think you

00:32:43.000 have to

00:32:43.280 counter program

00:32:44.080 him with

00:32:44.500 something that's

00:32:45.040 also good

00:32:45.880 that's the

00:32:46.940 antidote to

00:32:47.640 Trump.

00:32:48.620 Klobuchar

00:32:49.000 has that.

00:32:50.540 She looks

00:32:51.000 like a

00:32:52.620 dependable

00:32:53.720 pair of

00:32:54.320 shoes

00:32:54.680 and she's

00:32:56.820 nice.

00:32:57.740 Now there's

00:32:58.360 these rumors

00:32:59.140 about eating

00:33:00.340 solid with

00:33:00.980 her comb

00:33:01.600 and all

00:33:01.840 that.

00:33:02.120 I don't

00:33:02.340 know if

00:33:02.580 any of

00:33:02.860 that's

00:33:03.140 going to

00:33:03.900 be a

00:33:04.200 problem.

00:33:04.740 It doesn't

00:33:05.060 seem to

00:33:05.360 be dogging

00:33:05.920 her.

00:33:06.840 So I

00:33:07.060 think that

00:33:07.380 will be

00:33:07.620 nothing.

00:33:09.440 So anyway

00:33:09.780 she's got a 0.79

00:33:11.040 lot going

00:33:11.320 on so let's

00:33:11.920 keep an eye

00:33:12.520 on her and

00:33:13.040 see if she's

00:33:13.560 learned to

00:33:14.000 persuade as

00:33:14.860 well as I

00:33:15.520 fear she

00:33:16.020 may have.

00:33:18.520 Alright

00:33:18.940 let's talk

00:33:20.600 about

00:33:20.800 Bloomberg.

00:33:21.620 Bloomberg of

00:33:22.220 course has

00:33:22.660 that stop

00:33:23.740 and frisk

00:33:24.160 problem,

00:33:24.800 the black

00:33:25.120 support

00:33:25.440 problem.

00:33:26.540 But worse

00:33:27.340 than that he's

00:33:27.980 a terrible

00:33:28.560 matchup for

00:33:29.320 Trump.

00:33:30.440 If you

00:33:31.060 were to

00:33:31.360 take a

00:33:31.820 blank piece

00:33:32.320 of paper

00:33:32.660 and say

00:33:33.000 to yourself

00:33:33.380 alright your

00:33:34.080 exercise is

00:33:35.680 to invent

00:33:36.280 a candidate

00:33:37.160 and make

00:33:39.100 the candidate

00:33:39.620 the worst

00:33:40.440 matchup you

00:33:41.300 could possibly

00:33:41.980 think of

00:33:42.640 for President

00:33:43.900 Trump.

00:33:44.420 What's the

00:33:45.040 worst thing

00:33:45.520 you could do?

00:33:46.020 It's like

00:33:46.220 well billionaire

00:33:47.460 and that's

00:33:48.980 pretty bad

00:33:49.500 but worse

00:33:51.780 billionaire

00:33:52.700 with foreign

00:33:53.740 entanglements

00:33:54.640 especially with

00:33:55.720 countries we're

00:33:56.460 worried the most

00:33:57.240 about hello

00:33:58.480 China.

00:34:00.420 Bloomberg's

00:34:00.940 got China 0.99

00:34:02.100 entanglements

00:34:02.740 he's probably

00:34:03.140 got all kinds

00:34:03.920 of entanglements

00:34:04.560 all over the

00:34:05.080 globe.

00:34:06.040 Do any of

00:34:06.480 those entanglements

00:34:07.460 mean that

00:34:08.100 something bad

00:34:08.860 has happened

00:34:09.580 could happen

00:34:10.140 would happen?

00:34:11.580 Who knows?

00:34:12.740 But it's not

00:34:13.560 a good matchup

00:34:14.320 because that's

00:34:14.900 one of the

00:34:15.400 things that

00:34:15.840 people were

00:34:16.240 afraid of

00:34:16.740 with Trump

00:34:17.180 is the

00:34:18.240 international

00:34:19.060 entanglements.

00:34:20.540 So are you

00:34:21.040 going to

00:34:21.560 oppose him

00:34:23.160 with the guy

00:34:23.680 who has the

00:34:24.120 most international

00:34:25.140 entanglements

00:34:25.820 we've ever seen?

00:34:26.560 I doubt

00:34:27.580 anybody has

00:34:28.200 more international

00:34:29.040 entanglements

00:34:29.820 than Bloomberg.

00:34:32.240 Here's one

00:34:33.060 you don't see

00:34:33.540 coming

00:34:33.860 or maybe

00:34:34.320 you do.

00:34:36.120 Has

00:34:36.180 Bloomberg

00:34:36.820 got any

00:34:37.840 Me Too

00:34:38.720 problems?

00:34:41.680 Does anybody

00:34:42.620 I don't see

00:34:43.880 it in the

00:34:44.240 headlines

00:34:44.740 maybe there

00:34:46.080 were some

00:34:46.460 stories that

00:34:47.160 were unconfirmed

00:34:47.980 floating around

00:34:48.760 but here's

00:34:49.820 the thing

00:34:50.180 he's

00:34:51.440 an old

00:34:52.800 white

00:34:53.140 billionaire

00:34:53.600 billionaire

00:34:53.760 of a certain

00:34:54.940 age?

00:34:56.040 Let me

00:34:56.640 ask you

00:34:57.020 this question.

00:34:58.420 If you're

00:34:58.860 an old

00:34:59.520 white

00:35:00.260 billionaire

00:35:00.780 of a

00:35:01.300 certain

00:35:01.520 age

00:35:01.920 don't you

00:35:03.640 have a

00:35:04.020 lot of

00:35:04.360 me too's

00:35:04.940 in your

00:35:05.340 portfolio?

00:35:07.760 Now maybe

00:35:08.300 they haven't

00:35:08.860 all come

00:35:09.300 out

00:35:09.700 but the

00:35:10.860 odds

00:35:11.280 of any

00:35:13.140 old

00:35:13.660 white

00:35:13.920 billionaire

00:35:14.280 and I'm

00:35:15.380 not even

00:35:15.700 going to

00:35:15.900 make this

00:35:16.240 personal

00:35:16.720 about

00:35:17.780 Bloomberg

00:35:18.180 because I

00:35:18.620 have no

00:35:19.560 information

00:35:20.160 that would

00:35:20.600 say there's

00:35:21.020 anything wrong

00:35:21.740 with him

00:35:22.120 or he's

00:35:22.380 bad.

00:35:22.940 In fact I

00:35:23.440 like him.

00:35:23.940 I think

00:35:24.160 Bloomberg's

00:35:24.700 a solid

00:35:25.060 guy.

00:35:27.160 Bloomberg's

00:35:27.720 a solid

00:35:28.080 guy and I

00:35:28.720 would say

00:35:29.000 he's a

00:35:29.540 solid

00:35:30.380 patriot.

00:35:31.500 I don't

00:35:31.760 like his

00:35:33.760 political

00:35:34.180 opinion at

00:35:34.760 the moment

00:35:35.120 but he's

00:35:35.800 a solid

00:35:36.300 smart

00:35:36.920 reasonable

00:35:37.680 right-minded

00:35:39.520 kind of

00:35:40.500 guy.

00:35:41.580 But you

00:35:42.040 know

00:35:42.400 there's just

00:35:43.800 nobody in

00:35:44.640 that demographic

00:35:45.360 who isn't

00:35:46.300 going to

00:35:46.540 get a

00:35:46.840 me-too

00:35:47.180 coming out

00:35:47.740 of the

00:35:47.940 woods

00:35:48.200 somewhere.

00:35:49.400 Somewhere.

00:35:50.620 Now the

00:35:50.940 other big

00:35:53.340 thing that's

00:35:54.120 different about

00:35:54.580 him and

00:35:54.920 Trump is

00:35:55.300 climate change

00:35:56.020 and he's

00:35:56.940 going for

00:35:57.360 this get

00:35:58.860 rid of

00:35:59.520 most carbon

00:36:00.700 fuels 80%

00:36:01.780 or something.

00:36:03.540 He doesn't

00:36:04.080 go far

00:36:05.240 enough probably

00:36:06.140 for the

00:36:07.580 Democrats who

00:36:08.220 think it's

00:36:08.640 the end of

00:36:09.020 the world

00:36:09.380 climate change

00:36:10.160 but I saw

00:36:11.500 a study

00:36:12.060 recently that

00:36:12.660 said that

00:36:13.300 climate change

00:36:14.000 for the

00:36:14.420 country

00:36:14.860 as a

00:36:15.560 whole

00:36:15.880 was one

00:36:17.320 of the

00:36:17.560 lowest

00:36:17.800 priorities.

00:36:19.760 Now I'm

00:36:20.160 not sure I

00:36:20.560 totally

00:36:21.080 believe the

00:36:22.460 polls on

00:36:23.000 that because

00:36:23.500 the way

00:36:23.760 people answer

00:36:24.720 questions of

00:36:26.040 what is a

00:36:26.500 priority

00:36:26.940 can be

00:36:28.840 you know

00:36:30.660 I'm not

00:36:31.180 sure that

00:36:31.500 those are

00:36:31.920 really

00:36:32.440 credible

00:36:34.060 polls but

00:36:35.580 the poll I

00:36:36.160 saw showed

00:36:36.920 climate change

00:36:37.920 almost last

00:36:38.860 and economics

00:36:39.900 and immigration

00:36:40.740 toward the

00:36:41.320 top.

00:36:42.440 So that's

00:36:44.060 a problem.

00:36:44.860 Bloomberg

00:36:46.200 I'm sure

00:36:47.180 is not

00:36:47.680 going to

00:36:48.020 be as

00:36:48.360 pro-immigration

00:36:49.260 as his

00:36:49.840 own team

00:36:50.360 wants.

00:36:51.120 I just

00:36:51.500 don't think

00:36:51.880 he has

00:36:52.180 enough red

00:36:52.760 meat for

00:36:53.200 his own

00:36:53.580 team.

00:36:55.080 He's sort

00:36:55.780 of in that

00:36:56.200 weird

00:36:56.640 uninteresting

00:36:57.580 ground in

00:36:58.220 the middle.

00:36:59.260 He doesn't

00:36:59.760 have enough

00:37:00.260 for Democrats.

00:37:01.620 He's not

00:37:02.120 enough like

00:37:02.680 Trump to be

00:37:03.200 a Republican.

00:37:04.700 He's sort

00:37:05.280 of in that

00:37:05.800 dead man's

00:37:06.920 you know

00:37:07.700 in tennis

00:37:08.160 there's a

00:37:08.780 part of the

00:37:10.200 court that's

00:37:10.820 the dead

00:37:11.520 man's

00:37:11.880 zone that

00:37:12.960 if you

00:37:13.520 move into

00:37:14.060 that part

00:37:14.520 of the

00:37:14.720 tennis

00:37:14.960 court somebody's

00:37:16.000 going to win

00:37:16.340 the point

00:37:16.800 because it's

00:37:17.320 not a good

00:37:17.760 place to be.

00:37:18.500 It's too

00:37:18.720 close to the

00:37:19.220 net but

00:37:19.880 not close

00:37:20.400 enough.

00:37:22.360 I think

00:37:22.960 Bloomberg's

00:37:23.460 there.

00:37:23.840 He's in

00:37:24.100 that weird

00:37:24.820 area where

00:37:26.560 he's not

00:37:26.960 going to

00:37:27.180 excite

00:37:27.460 anybody.

00:37:29.040 So he's

00:37:31.100 also boring

00:37:31.760 and short

00:37:32.340 compared to

00:37:33.120 Trump.

00:37:33.540 We would

00:37:34.000 like to

00:37:34.340 think this

00:37:34.700 short doesn't

00:37:35.300 make a

00:37:35.620 difference.

00:37:36.500 Now Bloomberg's

00:37:37.200 roughly the

00:37:38.300 same size as

00:37:38.920 me.

00:37:40.180 Now do I

00:37:40.740 think I

00:37:41.140 could not

00:37:41.600 be president

00:37:42.160 because of

00:37:42.760 my height?

00:37:43.700 No I

00:37:44.180 could be

00:37:44.460 president.

00:37:45.520 If I

00:37:46.040 wanted to

00:37:46.580 I'm pretty

00:37:47.440 sure I

00:37:47.700 could do

00:37:47.960 it.

00:37:49.700 I did

00:37:50.240 write

00:37:50.440 Winn

00:37:50.660 Bigley.

00:37:52.500 Now I'm

00:37:52.980 not going

00:37:53.280 to do

00:37:53.500 it.

00:37:53.680 I have no

00:37:53.980 interest in

00:37:54.420 that kind

00:37:54.780 of work.

00:37:55.680 But I

00:37:56.520 don't think

00:37:56.860 my height

00:37:57.260 would stop

00:37:57.680 me.

00:37:58.680 So I

00:37:59.080 don't think

00:37:59.340 his height

00:37:59.640 is going

00:37:59.920 to stop

00:38:00.320 him.

00:38:00.560 But it's

00:38:00.840 a negative

00:38:01.200 if you

00:38:01.700 stand again

00:38:02.240 on this

00:38:03.100 screen.

00:38:03.880 People are

00:38:04.360 in their

00:38:05.480 non-critical

00:38:08.460 part of

00:38:08.840 their

00:38:08.960 brain

00:38:09.240 are just

00:38:09.640 going to

00:38:09.860 say

00:38:10.040 leader.

00:38:11.840 I want

00:38:12.540 a leader

00:38:12.880 who looks

00:38:13.260 like a

00:38:13.560 leader.

00:38:14.640 I'll take

00:38:15.300 the big

00:38:15.600 one.

00:38:16.020 Thank you.

00:38:17.020 So it

00:38:17.660 does make

00:38:18.080 a difference.

00:38:19.380 Maybe not

00:38:20.000 the commanding

00:38:20.840 difference.

00:38:21.720 The other

00:38:22.000 problem is

00:38:22.400 he's boring.

00:38:24.180 He's

00:38:24.620 boring.

00:38:26.820 He's

00:38:27.300 boring.

00:38:28.200 How do

00:38:28.780 you take

00:38:29.080 the most

00:38:29.460 boring

00:38:29.840 candidate

00:38:30.260 and put

00:38:31.440 him up

00:38:31.700 against

00:38:32.000 Trump?

00:38:32.380 The most

00:38:33.020 interesting

00:38:33.500 human being

00:38:34.260 we've ever

00:38:34.800 known in

00:38:36.180 the history

00:38:36.620 of civilization.

00:38:37.420 that's

00:38:38.400 like the

00:38:38.740 worst.

00:38:42.000 And also

00:38:42.740 there's a

00:38:43.120 question about

00:38:43.560 his age

00:38:44.020 whether he's

00:38:44.420 losing a

00:38:44.880 step.

00:38:45.580 That will

00:38:45.960 always be

00:38:46.320 a question.

00:38:47.700 And you

00:38:48.320 remember he

00:38:48.780 was talking

00:38:49.160 about how

00:38:49.600 he would

00:38:50.040 if he

00:38:50.740 became

00:38:51.000 president

00:38:51.440 he would

00:38:52.200 work from

00:38:52.660 a cubicle

00:38:53.200 basically

00:38:53.900 or an

00:38:55.480 open office

00:38:56.060 instead of

00:38:56.560 having private

00:38:57.700 offices.

00:38:58.760 That's the

00:38:59.420 worst instinct.

00:39:01.360 It sounds

00:39:01.960 like

00:39:02.800 you know

00:39:04.160 when

00:39:04.380 Bloomberg

00:39:05.120 did his

00:39:05.680 little

00:39:05.940 I'm going

00:39:06.260 to work

00:39:06.520 in a

00:39:06.760 cubicle

00:39:07.120 when

00:39:07.400 I'm

00:39:07.600 mayor

00:39:07.880 I

00:39:08.740 thought

00:39:08.940 to

00:39:09.060 myself

00:39:09.400 that's

00:39:09.840 not

00:39:10.000 bad

00:39:10.280 that's

00:39:10.800 not

00:39:10.940 bad

00:39:11.180 if

00:39:11.720 you're

00:39:11.920 a

00:39:12.140 mayor

00:39:12.480 you're

00:39:13.720 more

00:39:13.940 like

00:39:14.260 a

00:39:14.660 senior

00:39:15.320 vice

00:39:15.640 president

00:39:16.080 at

00:39:16.760 a

00:39:16.900 big

00:39:17.060 company

00:39:17.440 might

00:39:20.640 want

00:39:20.900 to

00:39:21.120 not

00:39:21.900 have

00:39:22.120 a

00:39:22.240 big

00:39:22.500 office

00:39:22.980 and

00:39:23.360 look

00:39:23.640 like

00:39:23.860 they're

00:39:24.040 special

00:39:24.440 might

00:39:25.060 want

00:39:25.240 to

00:39:25.300 have

00:39:25.420 a

00:39:25.540 cubicle

00:39:25.920 and

00:39:26.240 be

00:39:26.380 a

00:39:26.500 person

00:39:26.780 of

00:39:26.900 the

00:39:27.000 people

00:39:27.240 I

00:39:27.460 can

00:39:27.620 see

00:39:27.800 it

00:39:27.980 I

00:39:28.460 don't

00:39:28.580 think

00:39:28.740 it

00:39:28.820 was

00:39:28.940 important

00:39:29.360 you know

00:39:30.220 I

00:39:30.300 don't

00:39:30.400 think

00:39:36.520 but

00:39:38.280 as

00:39:38.440 soon

00:39:38.620 as

00:39:38.780 you

00:39:38.900 say

00:39:39.180 you're

00:39:39.640 going

00:39:39.740 to

00:39:39.780 be

00:39:39.900 the

00:39:40.080 brand

00:39:40.480 of

00:39:40.680 our

00:39:40.820 country

00:39:41.160 you're

00:39:41.440 going

00:39:41.540 to

00:39:41.620 be

00:39:41.820 the

00:39:42.660 person

00:39:43.000 we

00:39:43.260 think

00:39:43.560 of

00:39:43.820 when

00:39:44.000 we

00:39:44.160 think

00:39:44.380 of

00:39:44.480 the

00:39:44.580 United

00:39:44.840 States

00:39:45.280 you

00:39:46.100 don't

00:39:46.320 want

00:39:46.520 them

00:39:46.620 in

00:39:46.720 a

00:39:46.840 cubicle

00:39:47.260 you

00:39:48.320 want

00:39:48.640 them

00:39:48.760 in

00:39:48.860 the

00:39:48.980 oval

00:39:49.240 office

00:39:49.760 every

00:39:50.340 time

00:39:50.760 because

00:39:51.580 that

00:39:51.860 office

00:39:52.240 is

00:39:52.460 who

00:39:52.620 we

00:39:52.860 are

00:39:53.040 that's

00:39:53.280 our

00:39:53.440 brand

00:39:53.820 you

00:39:54.540 know

00:39:54.640 it'd

00:39:54.820 be

00:39:54.920 great

00:39:55.160 if

00:39:55.360 you

00:39:55.460 take

00:39:55.660 your

00:39:55.820 own

00:39:56.180 brand

00:39:56.620 Mike

00:39:57.480 Bloomberg

00:39:57.780 if

00:39:58.080 you

00:40:06.520 own

00:40:06.920 brand

00:40:07.320 but

00:40:08.200 if

00:40:08.340 you

00:40:08.440 become

00:40:08.740 president

00:40:09.200 you're

00:40:10.240 my

00:40:10.460 brand

00:40:10.860 you're

00:40:12.200 my

00:40:12.440 brand

00:40:12.860 as

00:40:13.500 president

00:40:13.860 what

00:40:14.260 you

00:40:14.500 do

00:40:14.760 reflects

00:40:15.240 on

00:40:15.460 me

00:40:15.740 if

00:40:16.480 you're

00:40:16.680 a

00:40:16.800 mayor

00:40:17.060 does

00:40:17.960 what

00:40:18.160 the

00:40:18.340 mayor

00:40:18.660 does

00:40:19.060 reflect

00:40:19.640 on

00:40:19.920 the

00:40:20.300 people

00:40:20.580 in

00:40:20.760 the

00:40:20.900 city

00:40:21.120 not

00:40:21.700 really

00:40:22.000 right

00:40:22.260 have

00:40:23.320 you

00:40:23.460 ever

00:40:23.680 bonded

00:40:24.220 have

00:40:24.920 you

00:40:25.020 ever

00:40:25.160 thought

00:40:25.520 of

00:40:25.660 yourself

00:40:26.100 as

00:40:26.960 being

00:40:27.140 part

00:40:27.360 of

00:40:27.460 the

00:40:27.580 brand

00:40:28.060 of

00:40:28.520 your

00:40:28.680 mayor

00:40:29.180 no

00:40:30.180 not

00:40:30.420 once

00:40:30.860 but

00:40:31.940 when

00:40:32.080 you

00:40:32.180 think

00:40:32.360 a

00:40:32.480 president

00:40:32.840 that's

00:40:33.340 an

00:40:33.440 accessory

00:40:33.860 to

00:40:34.180 you

00:40:34.420 you

00:40:36.080 you

00:40:37.000 American

00:40:37.540 citizens

00:40:38.060 a lot

00:40:38.440 of

00:40:38.540 people

00:40:38.720 from

00:40:38.940 other

00:40:39.140 countries

00:40:39.460 watching

00:40:39.820 this

00:40:40.020 but

00:40:40.440 if

00:40:40.560 you're

00:40:40.680 American

00:40:41.040 your

00:40:42.360 president

00:40:42.820 is part

00:40:43.360 of

00:40:43.440 your

00:40:43.560 brand

00:40:43.960 whether

00:40:44.180 you

00:40:44.320 like

00:40:44.560 it

00:40:44.680 or

00:40:44.780 not

00:40:45.080 and

00:40:45.860 and

00:40:46.040 that's

00:40:46.560 just

00:40:46.780 sort

00:40:47.480 of

00:40:47.580 a

00:40:47.740 dumb

00:40:48.220 old

00:40:48.680 person

00:40:49.120 move

00:40:49.660 to

00:40:50.720 not

00:40:51.000 correct

00:40:51.580 from

00:40:51.920 the

00:40:52.080 fact

00:40:52.300 that

00:40:52.480 what

00:40:52.660 he

00:40:52.780 did

00:40:52.960 as

00:40:53.140 a

00:40:53.260 mayor

00:40:53.520 just

00:40:54.320 doesn't

00:40:54.680 make

00:40:54.880 sense

00:40:55.340 as

00:40:56.060 president

00:40:56.480 it

00:40:56.780 just

00:40:56.920 doesn't

00:40:57.160 make

00:40:57.340 sense

00:40:57.700 and

00:40:58.200 it

00:40:58.320 feels

00:40:58.560 like

00:40:58.840 an

00:40:59.300 old

00:40:59.600 guy

00:40:59.960 who

00:41:04.180 popular

00:41:04.540 but

00:41:05.260 he

00:41:05.380 can't

00:41:05.620 write

00:41:05.780 a

00:41:05.880 hit

00:41:06.020 song

00:41:06.320 anymore

00:41:06.700 so

00:41:07.620 he's

00:41:08.020 just

00:41:08.360 going

00:41:08.560 to

00:41:08.580 play

00:41:08.740 the

00:41:08.920 oldies

00:41:09.320 I

00:41:09.620 just

00:41:09.780 don't

00:41:09.960 think

00:41:10.140 that

00:41:10.300 matches

00:41:10.580 up

00:41:10.820 against

00:41:11.080 Trump

00:41:11.380 I

00:41:13.940 also

00:41:14.160 think

00:41:14.440 Trump

00:41:14.720 has

00:41:15.120 another

00:41:16.460 advantage

00:41:17.140 which

00:41:18.620 is

00:41:18.940 that

00:41:19.640 he's

00:41:20.240 going

00:41:20.360 to

00:41:20.420 be

00:41:20.560 more

00:41:20.900 immune

00:41:21.500 from

00:41:22.180 fake

00:41:22.540 news

00:41:22.920 than

00:41:23.140 ever

00:41:23.360 before

00:41:23.800 if

00:41:25.340 because

00:41:25.860 we've

00:41:26.220 watched

00:41:26.660 the

00:41:27.700 fake

00:41:28.020 news

00:41:28.460 brand

00:41:29.520 Trump

00:41:29.960 as

00:41:30.140 a

00:41:30.300 certain

00:41:30.480 thing

00:41:30.780 and

00:41:30.940 then

00:41:31.080 be

00:41:31.280 wrong

00:41:31.680 time

00:41:32.260 after

00:41:32.540 time

00:41:32.800 after

00:41:33.020 time

00:41:33.380 you

00:41:33.600 from

00:41:34.180 Russia

00:41:34.800 collusion

00:41:35.340 you

00:41:36.060 name

00:41:36.580 it

00:41:36.720 you

00:41:36.880 know

00:41:36.980 what

00:41:37.080 I'm

00:41:37.180 talking

00:41:37.380 about

00:41:37.640 I

00:41:39.280 don't

00:41:39.500 know

00:41:39.720 if

00:41:39.960 the

00:41:40.620 attacks

00:41:41.000 on

00:41:41.220 Trump

00:41:41.460 will

00:41:41.640 have

00:41:41.780 the

00:41:41.940 same

00:41:42.160 power

00:41:42.680 they

00:41:43.740 might

00:41:44.000 have

00:41:44.360 before

00:41:44.700 we

00:41:44.920 saw

00:41:45.120 him

00:41:45.260 in

00:41:45.400 office

00:41:45.900 for

00:41:46.120 four

00:41:46.360 years

00:41:46.740 I

00:41:47.480 think

00:41:47.740 he's

00:41:49.380 just

00:41:49.700 more

00:41:50.100 immune

00:41:50.420 from

00:41:50.740 every

00:41:51.120 kind

00:41:51.400 of

00:41:51.520 attack

00:41:51.980 I

00:41:52.420 can't

00:41:52.620 even

00:41:52.760 imagine

00:41:53.160 what

00:41:54.080 kind

00:41:54.380 of

00:41:54.500 attack

00:41:54.800 he

00:41:55.000 hasn't

00:41:55.280 already

00:41:55.560 gone

00:41:55.860 through

00:41:56.260 and

00:41:57.000 it

00:41:57.120 didn't

00:41:57.340 take

00:41:57.560 him

00:41:57.680 out

00:41:57.820 last

00:41:58.080 time

00:41:58.340 so

00:41:59.180 he's

00:41:59.480 sort

00:41:59.820 of

00:42:00.020 more

00:42:00.720 Teflon

00:42:01.400 than

00:42:02.340 he

00:42:02.500 ever

00:42:02.760 was

00:42:03.180 and

00:42:03.400 he

00:42:03.540 was

00:42:03.720 pretty

00:42:04.020 Teflon

00:42:04.620 I

00:42:05.400 mean

00:42:05.720 grab him

00:42:06.380 by the

00:42:06.740 you know

00:42:07.100 what

00:42:07.420 and he

00:42:08.140 still

00:42:08.360 got

00:42:08.540 elected

00:42:08.880 that's

00:42:09.880 pretty

00:42:10.180 Teflon

00:42:10.760 so

00:42:11.580 he's

00:42:11.780 more

00:42:11.980 Teflon

00:42:12.420 than

00:42:12.560 ever

00:42:12.780 but

00:42:13.620 if

00:42:14.420 it's

00:42:14.600 somebody

00:42:14.840 like

00:42:15.160 Bernie

00:42:15.560 Bernie

00:42:16.340 has

00:42:16.620 a

00:42:16.860 real

00:42:17.400 problem

00:42:18.120 running

00:42:19.140 against

00:42:19.540 Trump

00:42:20.020 Bernie

00:42:21.660 has

00:42:21.940 a

00:42:22.100 real

00:42:22.320 problem

00:42:22.800 you

00:42:23.420 know

00:42:23.520 what

00:42:23.680 Bernie's

00:42:24.080 big

00:42:24.480 problem

00:42:24.880 is

00:42:25.220 he's

00:42:26.880 not

00:42:27.200 a

00:42:27.480 good

00:42:27.740 enough

00:42:28.020 liar

00:42:28.600 now

00:42:30.980 I

00:42:31.700 believe

00:42:32.040 that

00:42:32.220 Bernie

00:42:32.420 says

00:42:32.740 some

00:42:32.960 things

00:42:33.260 that

00:42:33.540 stretch

00:42:34.700 credulity

00:42:35.640 he

00:42:36.000 certainly

00:42:36.380 said

00:42:36.740 things

00:42:37.140 that

00:42:37.380 the

00:42:37.620 fact

00:42:37.880 checkers

00:42:38.380 checked

00:42:39.420 him

00:42:39.620 on

00:42:39.900 and

00:42:40.080 said

00:42:40.240 not

00:42:40.740 so

00:42:40.940 much

00:42:41.200 so

00:42:41.920 probably

00:42:42.620 there

00:42:42.980 are

00:42:43.100 no

00:42:43.300 politicians

00:42:43.800 who

00:42:44.140 don't

00:42:44.420 violate

00:42:44.920 the

00:42:45.120 fact

00:42:45.360 checking

00:42:45.720 sometimes

00:42:47.080 but

00:42:48.180 Bernie

00:42:48.520 is

00:42:48.760 kind

00:42:49.060 of

00:42:49.220 unique

00:42:49.800 and

00:42:50.640 that

00:42:50.800 he's

00:42:51.040 not

00:42:51.280 the

00:42:51.460 one

00:42:51.660 to

00:42:51.820 go

00:42:52.000 negative

00:42:52.400 as

00:42:52.980 much

00:42:53.340 and

00:42:53.600 he's

00:42:53.760 not

00:42:53.980 going

00:42:54.140 to

00:42:54.260 lie

00:42:54.560 as

00:42:54.760 much

00:42:55.080 so

00:42:56.140 he's

00:42:56.480 the

00:42:56.600 kind

00:42:56.800 of

00:42:56.920 person

00:42:57.180 if

00:42:57.360 you

00:42:57.460 said

00:42:57.640 hey

00:42:57.800 Bernie

00:42:58.080 I

00:42:59.000 don't

00:42:59.200 know

00:42:59.320 if

00:42:59.420 he's

00:42:59.580 ever

00:42:59.740 mentioned

00:43:00.040 this

00:43:00.260 he

00:43:00.360 probably

00:43:00.620 has

00:43:00.820 but

00:43:01.340 you

00:43:01.440 know

00:43:01.580 that

00:43:01.820 thing

00:43:02.660 in

00:43:02.840 Charlottesville

00:43:03.400 you got

00:43:03.800 that wrong

00:43:04.280 it turns

00:43:04.700 out

00:43:04.960 that

00:43:06.080 that

00:43:06.460 that's

00:43:07.000 a

00:43:07.120 misquote

00:43:07.560 the

00:43:07.860 president

00:43:08.180 never

00:43:08.580 said

00:43:09.800 that

00:43:10.100 the

00:43:10.300 neo-Nazis

00:43:10.880 were fine

00:43:11.300 people

00:43:11.600 he was

00:43:11.860 talking

00:43:12.080 about

00:43:12.280 the

00:43:12.400 other

00:43:12.560 people

00:43:12.840 there

00:43:13.120 that

00:43:14.420 he

00:43:14.540 said

00:43:14.760 were

00:43:14.980 not

00:43:16.080 the

00:43:16.320 races

00:43:16.660 if

00:43:17.780 you

00:43:17.920 tell

00:43:18.140 Biden

00:43:18.640 that

00:43:19.020 maybe

00:43:20.940 he'll

00:43:21.160 still

00:43:21.380 use

00:43:21.660 that

00:43:21.820 anyway

00:43:22.100 because

00:43:22.420 it

00:43:22.560 works

00:43:22.920 right

00:43:23.880 but

00:43:24.580 if

00:43:24.700 you

00:43:24.820 tell

00:43:25.020 Bernie

00:43:25.380 that

00:43:25.800 and

00:43:26.600 he

00:43:26.740 believes

00:43:27.080 oh

00:43:27.440 oh

00:43:27.900 geez

00:43:28.300 that's

00:43:28.700 not

00:43:28.860 even

00:43:29.020 true

00:43:29.340 and

00:43:29.900 it's

00:43:30.100 easy

00:43:30.360 to

00:43:30.560 prove

00:43:30.720 it's

00:43:30.880 not

00:43:31.060 true

00:43:31.320 you

00:43:31.880 just

00:43:32.040 look

00:43:32.220 at

00:43:32.320 the

00:43:32.420 transcript

00:43:32.820 I

00:43:33.840 don't

00:43:34.000 know

00:43:34.140 if

00:43:34.260 Bernie

00:43:34.480 would

00:43:34.680 use

00:43:34.900 it

00:43:35.160 maybe

00:43:36.520 he

00:43:36.700 would

00:43:36.920 maybe

00:43:38.320 he

00:43:38.500 would

00:43:38.680 but

00:43:39.520 I

00:43:39.620 think

00:43:39.800 Bernie

00:43:40.120 is

00:43:40.680 handicapped

00:43:41.760 by being

00:43:42.540 a little

00:43:42.940 too

00:43:43.180 honest

00:43:43.580 and

00:43:43.940 I

00:43:44.060 don't

00:43:44.200 know

00:43:44.340 if

00:43:44.460 that

00:43:44.560 would

00:43:44.700 work

00:43:44.940 in

00:43:45.060 a

00:43:45.180 general

00:43:45.420 election

00:43:45.860 you

00:43:46.180 know

00:43:46.300 what

00:43:46.360 I

00:43:46.460 mean

00:43:46.600 all

00:43:48.160 right

00:43:48.340 there's

00:43:51.800 one

00:43:52.160 suggestion

00:43:52.720 I

00:43:53.720 just

00:43:53.960 heard

00:43:54.300 this

00:43:54.500 from

00:43:54.720 an

00:43:54.960 opinion

00:43:55.240 person

00:43:55.640 that

00:43:56.800 one

00:43:57.080 of

00:43:57.180 the

00:43:57.300 reasons

00:43:57.620 that

00:43:58.140 Bernie

00:43:58.740 lost

00:43:59.120 some

00:43:59.320 support

00:43:59.780 allegedly

00:44:00.800 this

00:44:01.520 is

00:44:01.700 unconfirmed

00:44:02.400 but

00:44:02.940 recently

00:44:03.360 with

00:44:03.740 the

00:44:03.920 African

00:44:04.200 American

00:44:04.520 population

00:44:05.200 is

00:44:06.120 that

00:44:06.300 Joe

00:44:06.520 Rogan

00:44:07.500 said

00:44:09.480 he

00:44:09.600 might

00:44:09.780 vote

00:44:10.000 for

00:44:10.220 him

00:44:10.420 now

00:44:11.420 does

00:44:11.980 that

00:44:12.180 feel

00:44:12.440 right

00:44:12.700 to

00:44:12.860 you

00:44:13.080 do

00:44:13.840 you

00:44:13.960 think

00:44:14.180 that

00:44:14.420 his

00:44:14.740 African

00:44:15.280 American

00:44:15.680 support

00:44:16.180 would

00:44:16.520 plummet

00:44:17.040 because

00:44:17.860 Joe

00:44:18.180 Rogan

00:44:18.520 said

00:44:18.740 he

00:44:18.840 might

00:44:19.040 vote

00:44:19.340 for

00:44:19.640 Bernie

00:44:20.120 Sanders

00:44:20.500 I

00:44:20.940 don't

00:44:21.100 think

00:44:21.480 so

00:44:21.780 I

00:44:22.420 don't

00:44:22.540 think

00:44:22.700 people

00:44:22.960 are

00:44:23.100 paying

00:44:23.320 attention

00:44:23.680 at

00:44:23.920 that

00:44:24.180 level

00:44:24.480 because

00:44:25.420 what

00:44:25.900 the

00:44:26.060 heck

00:44:26.300 do

00:44:26.580 the

00:44:26.780 black

00:44:27.060 community

00:44:27.500 have

00:44:27.840 what

00:44:28.260 problem

00:44:28.620 do

00:44:28.800 they

00:44:28.920 have

00:44:29.100 with

00:44:29.240 Joe

00:44:29.400 Rogan

00:44:29.740 so

00:44:30.580 it

00:44:30.720 turns

00:44:30.920 out

00:44:31.240 he's

00:44:32.400 comedian

00:44:33.040 and

00:44:33.380 provocative

00:44:33.860 and he's

00:44:34.360 been around

00:44:34.740 for a long

00:44:35.200 time

00:44:35.540 so you can

00:44:36.040 dig

00:44:36.240 through his

00:44:36.660 past

00:44:36.980 and you

00:44:37.240 can find

00:44:37.640 something

00:44:37.980 to be

00:44:38.300 offended

00:44:38.600 by

00:44:38.880 but I

00:44:40.460 don't

00:44:40.560 think most

00:44:40.940 of you are

00:44:41.260 aware of it

00:44:41.800 and it's

00:44:42.160 not real

00:44:42.680 it's just

00:44:43.640 being provocative

00:44:44.660 and being

00:44:45.700 offensive

00:44:46.100 is a lot

00:44:47.440 different

00:44:47.860 from being

00:44:48.960 racist

00:44:49.480 he's not

00:44:50.040 racist

00:44:50.400 or even

00:44:50.880 close

00:44:51.320 at least

00:44:52.500 there's

00:44:52.880 certainly no

00:44:53.480 evidence of it

00:44:54.160 and there's

00:44:54.440 lots of

00:44:54.800 evidence against

00:44:55.420 it

00:44:55.720 so

00:44:56.580 Joe Rogan

00:44:58.640 got a lot

00:44:59.120 of heat

00:44:59.380 from that

00:44:59.820 and he

00:45:00.500 clarified

00:45:00.960 his

00:45:01.500 opinion

00:45:02.280 which I

00:45:02.740 hadn't heard

00:45:03.080 before

00:45:03.400 and it

00:45:03.740 goes like

00:45:04.120 this

00:45:04.400 so this

00:45:05.740 is Joe

00:45:06.120 Rogan

00:45:06.440 clarifying

00:45:07.000 his opinion

00:45:07.420 about

00:45:07.740 Sanders

00:45:08.560 and he

00:45:09.920 said on

00:45:10.260 his

00:45:10.400 podcast

00:45:11.760 all I

00:45:13.200 said is

00:45:13.640 I'm

00:45:13.880 probably

00:45:14.180 going to

00:45:14.500 vote for

00:45:14.820 him

00:45:15.000 but he

00:45:16.160 added

00:45:16.460 I like

00:45:17.300 I like

00:45:17.940 Tulsi

00:45:18.280 Gavard

00:45:18.720 I love

00:45:19.560 I love

00:45:20.000 her

00:45:20.180 I love

00:45:20.580 him

00:45:20.820 I love

00:45:21.320 Andrew

00:45:21.660 Yang

00:45:21.960 so he

00:45:23.000 was making

00:45:23.360 the point

00:45:23.780 that he's

00:45:24.320 you know

00:45:24.820 it's not

00:45:25.200 about one

00:45:25.760 candidate

00:45:26.160 there are

00:45:26.940 several

00:45:27.240 candidates

00:45:27.800 that he

00:45:28.200 likes

00:45:28.620 and then

00:45:29.880 he goes

00:45:30.460 and this

00:45:31.500 is why

00:45:32.180 Joe Rogan

00:45:33.680 is a

00:45:33.960 national

00:45:34.320 treasure

00:45:34.740 because the

00:45:35.880 next thing

00:45:36.280 he says

00:45:36.800 not many

00:45:38.020 people could

00:45:38.540 say

00:45:38.860 I mean

00:45:39.940 he just

00:45:40.280 he can go

00:45:40.920 where other

00:45:41.400 people can't 0.97

00:45:41.980 go

00:45:42.200 and this

00:45:42.840 is what

00:45:43.120 Joe Rogan

00:45:43.640 says

00:45:43.960 he goes

00:45:44.340 quote

00:45:44.680 here's the

00:45:45.820 really important

00:45:46.480 point

00:45:46.920 I'm an

00:45:48.120 effing

00:45:48.460 moron

00:45:48.940 he used

00:45:49.400 the real

00:45:49.760 word

00:45:50.000 I'm an

00:45:50.460 effing

00:45:50.720 moron

00:45:51.500 Joe Rogan

00:45:52.220 added

00:45:52.540 and went

00:45:53.480 on to

00:45:53.800 say

00:45:54.000 I don't

00:45:55.560 know

00:45:55.720 what's

00:45:56.000 required

00:45:56.400 to be

00:45:56.740 president

00:45:57.140 and that

00:45:57.860 maybe

00:45:58.320 we're

00:45:58.640 better

00:45:58.880 off

00:45:59.100 with

00:45:59.260 Trump

00:45:59.540 maybe

00:46:00.440 we're

00:46:00.720 better

00:46:00.900 off

00:46:01.120 with

00:46:01.260 someone

00:46:01.460 else

00:46:01.740 I

00:46:02.280 don't

00:46:02.480 know

00:46:02.760 so

00:46:06.000 Rogan

00:46:06.740 of course

00:46:07.620 famously

00:46:08.240 has had

00:46:08.660 experiences

00:46:09.300 with

00:46:09.860 hallucinogenics

00:46:10.880 and

00:46:11.720 I've always

00:46:12.820 told you

00:46:13.200 that that

00:46:13.600 allows you

00:46:14.120 to

00:46:15.000 see the

00:46:16.160 world

00:46:16.460 through

00:46:16.840 different

00:46:17.240 filters

00:46:17.780 if you

00:46:19.320 have

00:46:19.580 experience

00:46:20.440 with

00:46:21.060 altered

00:46:21.960 consciousness

00:46:22.540 you know

00:46:23.640 that you

00:46:24.080 can experience

00:46:24.820 a world

00:46:25.180 that works

00:46:25.700 perfectly

00:46:26.180 you can

00:46:26.740 eat

00:46:27.140 and procreate

00:46:27.960 and go

00:46:28.240 to work

00:46:28.620 but it

00:46:29.120 all just

00:46:29.420 looks

00:46:29.660 different

00:46:30.000 if you've

00:46:31.580 never

00:46:31.760 experienced

00:46:32.260 that

00:46:32.580 you think

00:46:33.140 that your

00:46:33.460 point of

00:46:33.860 view

00:46:34.080 might be

00:46:34.920 magic

00:46:35.360 it's like

00:46:36.180 ah

00:46:36.520 how did

00:46:37.500 I get

00:46:37.780 the right

00:46:38.140 point of

00:46:38.520 view

00:46:38.700 when there

00:46:39.140 are

00:46:39.560 7 billion

00:46:40.220 people

00:46:40.540 in the

00:46:40.720 world

00:46:40.880 who got

00:46:41.220 it

00:46:41.340 wrong

00:46:41.640 I'm

00:46:42.360 magic

00:46:42.780 my brain

00:46:43.780 can see

00:46:44.200 things

00:46:44.540 that other

00:46:44.840 people

00:46:45.080 can't

00:46:45.480 I'm

00:46:46.080 the only

00:46:46.420 one

00:46:46.700 with a

00:46:47.060 clear

00:46:47.460 view

00:46:47.760 of the

00:46:48.000 world

00:46:48.340 that's

00:46:49.640 kind

00:46:49.940 of a

00:46:50.200 low

00:46:50.420 level

00:46:50.740 of

00:46:50.940 consciousness

00:46:51.420 the

00:46:52.480 highest

00:46:52.920 level

00:46:53.260 of

00:46:53.460 consciousness

00:46:54.000 is

00:46:55.180 expressed

00:46:55.680 in this

00:46:56.160 statement

00:46:56.580 you ready

00:46:57.520 here's a

00:46:58.520 sentence

00:46:58.860 from one

00:47:00.320 of the

00:47:00.560 highest

00:47:01.000 consciousness

00:47:02.000 people

00:47:02.500 the people

00:47:02.860 who can

00:47:03.120 really

00:47:03.420 see the

00:47:03.860 field

00:47:04.080 clearly

00:47:04.600 Joe

00:47:05.460 Rogan

00:47:05.880 I'm

00:47:06.980 an

00:47:07.120 effing

00:47:07.480 moron

00:47:07.960 I don't

00:47:09.740 know what's

00:47:10.220 required to

00:47:10.880 be president

00:47:11.420 and that

00:47:12.300 maybe we're

00:47:12.880 better off

00:47:13.340 with Trump

00:47:13.760 maybe we're

00:47:14.280 better off

00:47:14.620 with someone

00:47:14.960 else

00:47:15.240 I don't

00:47:15.800 know

00:47:16.100 that

00:47:17.240 statement

00:47:17.760 that he

00:47:19.240 doesn't

00:47:19.640 know

00:47:20.000 who would

00:47:22.320 be the

00:47:22.540 best

00:47:22.740 president

00:47:23.140 or the

00:47:23.620 complexity

00:47:24.100 of the

00:47:24.940 policies

00:47:25.380 etc.

00:47:26.840 is the

00:47:27.560 highest

00:47:27.940 level

00:47:28.400 of

00:47:28.740 awareness

00:47:29.240 the

00:47:31.020 level below

00:47:31.860 that is

00:47:32.400 oh I

00:47:32.780 know

00:47:33.060 oh yeah

00:47:33.860 I know

00:47:34.280 this one's

00:47:35.300 the good

00:47:35.560 one

00:47:35.780 and I

00:47:36.680 can tell

00:47:37.020 you what

00:47:37.260 the future

00:47:37.700 looks like

00:47:38.320 you could

00:47:40.780 be right

00:47:41.280 you could

00:47:42.860 be wrong

00:47:43.360 but the

00:47:44.540 higher

00:47:44.860 level

00:47:45.220 of

00:47:45.400 awareness

00:47:45.780 is

00:47:46.180 we're

00:47:47.220 just

00:47:47.520 not

00:47:47.860 that

00:47:48.160 smart

00:47:48.600 we

00:47:49.340 really

00:47:49.700 don't

00:47:50.180 know

00:47:50.380 what's

00:47:50.640 going

00:47:50.780 to

00:47:50.840 happen

00:47:51.100 so

00:47:52.880 I'm

00:47:55.240 happy

00:47:55.560 that

00:47:56.000 Joe

00:47:57.140 Rogan

00:47:57.500 added

00:47:57.800 some

00:47:58.100 context

00:47:58.680 to that

00:47:59.160 without

00:47:59.460 changing

00:47:59.940 his

00:48:00.240 opinion

00:48:00.540 because

00:48:01.200 he

00:48:01.300 didn't

00:48:01.540 say

00:48:01.860 therefore

00:48:02.620 I'm

00:48:02.940 not

00:48:03.200 going

00:48:03.320 to

00:48:03.420 vote

00:48:03.560 for

00:48:03.740 Bernie

00:48:03.960 he

00:48:04.220 stayed

00:48:04.720 with

00:48:04.940 that

00:48:05.160 but

00:48:05.700 then

00:48:05.840 he

00:48:05.940 gave

00:48:06.140 us

00:48:06.280 the

00:48:06.420 context

00:48:06.920 that

00:48:07.840 in his

00:48:08.680 own

00:48:08.860 opinion

00:48:09.160 he's

00:48:09.560 an

00:48:09.760 moron

00:48:10.440 who

00:48:10.620 doesn't

00:48:10.860 know

00:48:11.040 who

00:48:11.200 would

00:48:11.320 be

00:48:11.440 the

00:48:11.580 best

00:48:11.780 president

00:48:12.220 nobody

00:48:13.300 ever

00:48:13.680 said

00:48:13.960 anything

00:48:14.260 more

00:48:14.540 honest

00:48:14.880 than

00:48:15.060 that

00:48:15.260 that

00:48:16.700 is

00:48:16.860 the

00:48:17.080 most

00:48:17.520 honest

00:48:18.200 thing

00:48:18.600 you've

00:48:19.420 heard

00:48:19.600 in

00:48:19.780 public

00:48:20.260 about

00:48:21.340 politics

00:48:21.940 period

00:48:22.280 that's

00:48:22.740 the

00:48:22.860 most

00:48:23.240 clear

00:48:24.280 highest

00:48:25.200 consciousness

00:48:25.880 understanding

00:48:27.940 you've

00:48:28.980 ever seen

00:48:29.440 in public

00:48:30.040 that's

00:48:30.440 it

00:48:30.660 can't

00:48:31.860 beat

00:48:31.980 that

00:48:32.260 all

00:48:32.780 right

00:48:33.220 I

00:48:38.760 was

00:48:39.120 laughing

00:48:39.460 at

00:48:39.720 Pope

00:48:40.020 Francis

00:48:40.560 and

00:48:41.400 I

00:48:41.520 don't

00:48:41.640 want

00:48:41.740 to

00:48:41.820 get

00:48:41.940 religious

00:48:42.360 and

00:48:42.640 this

00:48:42.780 is

00:48:42.940 not

00:48:43.160 an

00:48:43.360 anti

00:48:43.620 catholic

00:48:44.040 thing

00:48:44.260 by

00:48:44.400 any

00:48:44.600 means

00:48:44.800 I'm

00:48:45.020 pro

00:48:45.220 religion

00:48:45.680 for

00:48:46.220 those

00:48:46.440 of

00:48:46.560 you

00:48:46.640 don't

00:48:46.860 know

00:48:47.040 I'm

00:48:47.620 not

00:48:47.800 a

00:48:47.940 believer

00:48:48.200 myself

00:48:48.740 but

00:48:49.540 I

00:48:49.640 think

00:48:49.800 religion

00:48:50.180 is

00:48:50.460 mostly

00:48:52.000 90%

00:48:53.260 is

00:48:53.700 positive

00:48:54.200 in

00:48:54.400 people's

00:48:54.780 lives

00:48:55.140 it

00:48:55.860 helps

00:48:56.100 them

00:48:56.260 here

00:48:56.440 on

00:48:56.620 earth

00:48:56.880 and

00:48:57.140 that's

00:48:57.440 great

00:48:57.740 so

00:48:58.140 if

00:48:58.320 it's

00:48:58.500 a

00:48:58.640 filter

00:48:58.900 that

00:48:59.140 works

00:48:59.380 for

00:48:59.580 you

00:48:59.740 it's

00:48:59.900 a

00:49:00.000 way

00:49:00.100 to

00:49:00.220 see

00:49:00.480 the

00:49:00.640 world

00:49:00.940 produces

00:49:02.100 benefits

00:49:02.660 obviously

00:49:03.320 does

00:49:03.820 I'm

00:49:04.280 in

00:49:04.380 favor

00:49:04.580 of

00:49:04.800 religion

00:49:05.140 if

00:49:05.720 you

00:49:05.860 don't

00:49:06.140 take

00:49:06.600 it

00:49:06.700 to

00:49:06.780 the

00:49:06.920 extreme

00:49:07.240 but

00:49:08.980 I

00:49:09.360 observe

00:49:09.980 religion

00:49:10.640 as

00:49:12.180 an

00:49:12.340 observer

00:49:12.680 and

00:49:13.980 I

00:49:14.340 can't

00:49:14.640 help

00:49:14.900 but

00:49:15.360 wondering

00:49:15.780 how

00:49:16.140 these

00:49:16.400 conversations

00:49:17.060 went

00:49:17.540 so

00:49:18.360 Pope

00:49:18.740 Francis

00:49:19.140 says

00:49:19.480 he's

00:49:21.580 now

00:49:21.780 supporting

00:49:22.280 the

00:49:22.520 ordination

00:49:23.020 of

00:49:23.460 married

00:49:23.880 men

00:49:24.180 as

00:49:24.460 priests

00:49:24.800 in

00:49:25.060 the

00:49:25.180 Amazon

00:49:25.460 so

00:49:26.080 I

00:49:26.180 guess

00:49:26.360 that

00:49:26.500 was

00:49:26.620 a

00:49:26.740 question

00:49:27.060 so

00:49:28.060 there

00:49:28.320 weren't

00:49:28.500 enough

00:49:28.760 people

00:49:29.020 who

00:49:29.180 wanted

00:49:29.340 to

00:49:29.480 be

00:49:30.000 priests

00:49:30.120 unless

00:49:30.800 you

00:49:31.040 let

00:49:31.240 them

00:49:31.440 also

00:49:31.760 be

00:49:32.000 married

00:49:32.320 which

00:49:32.740 would

00:49:33.040 mean

00:49:33.220 that

00:49:33.400 they

00:49:33.540 would

00:49:33.660 be

00:49:33.940 having

00:49:34.300 relations

00:49:35.500 with

00:49:36.000 a

00:49:36.160 woman 0.99

00:49:36.420 which

00:49:37.260 is

00:49:37.560 apparently

00:49:38.020 not

00:49:38.320 allowed

00:49:38.680 if

00:49:39.300 you're

00:49:39.460 going

00:49:39.540 to

00:49:39.580 be

00:49:39.680 a

00:49:39.820 Catholic

00:49:40.080 priest

00:49:40.440 and

00:49:41.700 I

00:49:41.840 wondered

00:49:42.140 how

00:49:42.880 does

00:49:43.100 that

00:49:43.280 conversation

00:49:43.860 go

00:49:44.200 well

00:49:45.680 you get

00:49:46.540 to be

00:49:46.800 a

00:49:47.140 leader

00:49:47.600 a

00:49:48.640 respected

00:49:49.080 leader

00:49:49.420 in our

00:49:49.800 religion

00:49:50.180 there's

00:49:51.140 just

00:49:51.320 one

00:49:51.600 thing

00:49:51.900 really

00:49:52.900 sounds

00:49:53.520 great

00:49:53.820 what's

00:49:54.140 the

00:49:54.280 one

00:49:54.480 thing

00:49:54.840 well

00:49:56.460 there's

00:49:57.280 one

00:49:57.460 thing

00:49:57.660 you

00:49:57.820 can't

00:49:58.140 do

00:49:58.340 what

00:50:00.460 you

00:50:01.380 can't

00:50:02.000 can't

00:50:03.300 have

00:50:03.400 sex

00:50:03.760 can't

00:50:04.700 have

00:50:04.720 sex

00:50:05.040 all

00:50:05.880 right

00:50:06.020 well

00:50:06.200 I

00:50:06.340 can

00:50:06.720 put up

00:50:07.340 with

00:50:07.480 having

00:50:07.840 sex

00:50:08.160 for a

00:50:08.400 while

00:50:08.600 well

00:50:09.260 I

00:50:09.460 didn't

00:50:09.600 say

00:50:09.760 a

00:50:09.860 while

00:50:10.200 like

00:50:11.540 forever

00:50:12.260 for

00:50:13.280 for the

00:50:13.480 rest

00:50:13.660 of

00:50:13.760 your

00:50:13.860 life

00:50:14.140 what

00:50:15.880 yeah

00:50:16.680 I

00:50:17.000 mean

00:50:17.140 you

00:50:17.280 can

00:50:17.420 be

00:50:17.560 a

00:50:17.680 priest

00:50:18.020 but

00:50:18.700 you

00:50:18.820 can't

00:50:19.020 have

00:50:19.180 sex

00:50:19.640 for

00:50:21.020 the

00:50:21.160 rest

00:50:21.340 of

00:50:21.440 your

00:50:21.540 life

00:50:21.800 and

00:50:23.920 then

00:50:24.060 you

00:50:24.200 can

00:50:24.320 imagine

00:50:24.560 the

00:50:24.740 person

00:50:24.980 saying

00:50:25.300 wow

00:50:26.080 that's

00:50:27.200 tough

00:50:27.580 but

00:50:27.920 you

00:50:29.020 know

00:50:29.200 at

00:50:29.940 least

00:50:30.120 I

00:50:30.340 can

00:50:30.560 you

00:50:31.100 know

00:50:31.180 if

00:50:31.260 I

00:50:31.360 can't

00:50:31.560 have

00:50:31.720 sex

00:50:31.980 with

00:50:32.120 another

00:50:32.340 person

00:50:32.720 at

00:50:32.960 least

00:50:33.140 I

00:50:33.380 can

00:50:33.640 take

00:50:34.500 care

00:50:34.700 of

00:50:34.800 myself

00:50:35.200 right

00:50:35.520 well

00:50:36.900 no

00:50:38.640 so

00:50:40.020 you

00:50:40.200 can't

00:50:40.580 do

00:50:40.860 it

00:50:40.960 with

00:50:41.100 another

00:50:41.360 person

00:50:41.820 but

00:50:42.800 also

00:50:43.200 you

00:50:43.620 can't

00:50:43.960 do

00:50:44.080 it

00:50:44.180 with

00:50:44.300 yourself

00:50:44.760 would

00:50:46.280 you

00:50:46.400 like

00:50:46.600 the

00:50:46.780 job

00:50:47.160 that's

00:50:49.540 pretty

00:50:49.800 severe

00:50:50.500 can't

00:50:51.720 do

00:50:51.940 can't

00:50:52.320 have

00:50:52.460 an

00:50:52.740 intimate

00:50:53.240 relationship

00:50:53.820 with

00:50:54.080 a

00:50:54.180 woman 0.99

00:50:54.420 and

00:50:55.360 I

00:50:55.520 can't

00:50:55.940 even

00:50:56.160 take

00:50:56.460 care

00:50:56.660 of

00:50:56.780 it

00:50:56.860 myself

00:50:57.380 I

00:50:59.300 guess

00:50:59.500 I'm

00:50:59.700 going

00:50:59.800 to

00:50:59.840 have

00:50:59.960 to

00:51:00.060 do

00:51:00.180 it

00:51:00.280 for

00:51:00.380 the

00:51:00.520 money

00:51:00.840 what's

00:51:01.900 it

00:51:02.040 pay

00:51:02.340 five

00:51:03.480 ten

00:51:03.780 million

00:51:04.040 a

00:51:04.200 year

00:51:04.380 well

00:51:06.280 you're

00:51:07.700 also

00:51:07.960 going

00:51:08.240 to

00:51:08.320 be

00:51:08.620 closer

00:51:09.840 to

00:51:10.140 poor

00:51:10.500 than

00:51:10.760 rich

00:51:11.120 I

00:51:14.000 don't

00:51:14.140 know

00:51:14.260 how

00:51:14.360 you

00:51:14.520 sell

00:51:14.720 that

00:51:14.920 job

00:51:15.280 frankly

00:51:15.700 but

00:51:16.780 so

00:51:17.560 I

00:51:17.740 watch

00:51:18.000 it

00:51:18.120 as

00:51:18.280 an

00:51:18.400 outsider

00:51:18.800 I'm

00:51:19.800 glad

00:51:20.040 that

00:51:20.240 people

00:51:20.460 do

00:51:20.700 it

00:51:20.920 because

00:51:21.580 religion

00:51:21.960 is

00:51:22.240 good

00:51:22.540 I

00:51:22.720 think

00:51:22.880 in

00:51:23.000 the

00:51:23.100 world

00:51:23.380 but

00:51:25.340 so

00:51:26.280 that's

00:51:26.680 enough

00:51:26.880 about

00:51:27.080 that

00:51:27.320 some

00:51:29.920 get

00:51:30.120 rich

00:51:30.400 somebody

00:51:30.700 says

00:51:31.040 yeah

00:51:31.240 that

00:51:31.380 would

00:51:31.500 be

00:51:31.580 the

00:51:31.740 exception

00:51:32.060 I

00:51:32.240 think

00:51:32.420 I'm

00:51:32.980 going

00:51:33.060 to

00:51:33.100 give

00:51:33.240 you

00:51:33.340 a

00:51:33.460 suggestion

00:51:33.900 that's

00:51:34.240 the

00:51:34.340 best

00:51:34.520 suggestion

00:51:34.920 you've

00:51:35.160 heard

00:51:35.480 are you

00:51:35.820 ready

00:51:36.020 here

00:51:36.760 it

00:51:36.860 is

00:51:37.100 during

00:51:37.640 the

00:51:37.900 election

00:51:38.240 season

00:51:38.680 all

00:51:39.020 the

00:51:39.180 candidates

00:51:39.620 like

00:51:39.900 to

00:51:40.040 take

00:51:40.360 issues

00:51:40.840 off

00:51:41.100 the

00:51:41.260 table

00:51:41.540 so

00:51:42.160 if

00:51:42.280 there's

00:51:42.480 something

00:51:42.740 that

00:51:42.940 somebody's

00:51:43.340 killing

00:51:43.640 you

00:51:43.820 with

00:51:44.020 as

00:51:44.200 an

00:51:44.320 issue

00:51:44.600 if

00:51:45.240 you

00:51:45.300 can

00:51:45.420 do

00:51:45.560 something

00:51:45.840 to

00:51:46.080 remove

00:51:46.860 that

00:51:47.220 that's

00:51:47.520 good

00:51:47.740 one

00:51:48.420 one

00:51:48.440 one

00:51:48.460 of

00:51:48.540 things

00:51:48.880 that

00:51:49.180 Bernie

00:51:49.620 and

00:51:49.960 some

00:51:50.160 of

00:51:50.240 the

00:51:50.300 other

00:51:50.460 Democrats

00:51:50.980 most

00:51:51.400 of

00:51:51.520 them

00:51:51.640 are

00:51:52.620 pushing

00:51:52.900 is

00:51:53.320 legalizing

00:51:54.000 weed

00:51:54.320 at

00:51:54.520 the

00:51:54.660 federal

00:51:54.920 level

00:51:55.300 and

00:51:56.240 we

00:51:58.340 see

00:51:58.620 Trump

00:51:59.020 is

00:51:59.200 completely

00:51:59.680 vulnerable

00:52:00.200 to that

00:52:00.660 argument

00:52:00.980 because

00:52:01.860 he's

00:52:02.300 kind

00:52:02.620 of

00:52:02.720 quiet

00:52:03.040 on

00:52:03.280 it

00:52:03.480 and

00:52:04.260 he's

00:52:04.480 also

00:52:04.760 famously

00:52:05.380 anti-drug

00:52:06.340 so

00:52:07.220 he's

00:52:07.420 not

00:52:07.620 really

00:52:07.860 the

00:52:08.060 right

00:52:08.280 person

00:52:08.760 to

00:52:09.640 take

00:52:09.880 that

00:52:10.140 argument

00:52:10.520 to

00:52:10.960 the

00:52:11.100 public

00:52:11.440 even

00:52:11.780 if

00:52:11.960 he

00:52:12.080 agrees

00:52:12.400 with

00:52:12.560 it

00:52:12.700 we

00:52:12.940 don't

00:52:13.100 know

00:52:13.240 if

00:52:13.360 he

00:52:17.740 guy

00:52:18.240 personally

00:52:19.600 in

00:52:19.840 his

00:52:19.980 life

00:52:20.260 it's

00:52:20.460 made

00:52:20.600 a

00:52:20.700 big

00:52:20.840 difference

00:52:21.200 he's

00:52:21.500 never

00:52:21.720 touched

00:52:22.200 any

00:52:22.880 kind

00:52:23.120 of

00:52:23.240 drug

00:52:23.540 so

00:52:25.080 he

00:52:25.240 would

00:52:25.380 be

00:52:25.480 the

00:52:25.660 wrong

00:52:25.960 person

00:52:26.420 I

00:52:27.020 think

00:52:27.400 to

00:52:28.720 promote

00:52:29.280 legalization

00:52:30.140 of any

00:52:30.540 kind

00:52:30.860 because

00:52:31.180 it

00:52:31.340 just

00:52:31.580 goes

00:52:31.920 against

00:52:32.240 his

00:52:32.540 personal

00:52:33.620 story

00:52:34.080 too

00:52:34.300 hard

00:52:34.620 but

00:52:35.800 at

00:52:35.960 the

00:52:36.080 same

00:52:36.240 time

00:52:36.480 the

00:52:36.620 public

00:52:36.880 wants

00:52:37.240 it

00:52:37.440 and

00:52:37.840 it's

00:52:38.000 a

00:52:38.100 big

00:52:38.260 problem

00:52:38.680 for

00:52:38.900 the

00:52:39.000 election

00:52:39.300 here

00:52:39.580 is

00:52:39.720 my

00:52:39.900 suggestion

00:52:40.360 are

00:52:40.600 you

00:52:40.660 ready

00:52:40.900 President

00:52:42.720 Trump

00:52:43.100 should

00:52:43.380 delegate

00:52:43.920 the

00:52:44.800 decision

00:52:45.280 to

00:52:45.900 Ben

00:52:46.200 Carson

00:52:46.640 now

00:52:47.680 I

00:52:47.800 know

00:52:47.920 this

00:52:48.140 isn't

00:52:48.440 Ben

00:52:48.700 Carson's

00:52:49.340 job

00:52:50.700 in the

00:52:51.660 cabinet

00:52:51.960 but

00:52:53.100 Ben

00:52:53.760 Carson

00:52:54.040 is a

00:52:54.520 famous

00:52:54.980 medical

00:52:55.840 professional

00:52:56.420 one of

00:52:56.880 the most

00:52:57.200 well

00:52:58.100 maybe

00:52:58.400 the most

00:52:58.900 famous

00:52:59.200 doctor

00:52:59.580 in the

00:52:59.860 world

00:53:00.120 can

00:53:01.100 you

00:53:01.400 think

00:53:01.620 of

00:53:01.740 a

00:53:01.920 medical

00:53:02.300 doctor

00:53:02.760 who's

00:53:03.100 not

00:53:03.240 like

00:53:03.460 Dr.

00:53:03.900 Oz 0.90

00:53:04.300 but

00:53:05.020 somebody

00:53:05.460 who's

00:53:05.740 credible

00:53:06.420 as

00:53:06.800 an

00:53:07.700 actual

00:53:08.060 physician

00:53:08.660 or

00:53:08.860 something

00:53:09.100 I

00:53:09.500 would

00:53:09.620 say

00:53:09.740 Ben

00:53:09.980 Carson

00:53:10.260 is

00:53:10.460 one

00:53:10.600 of

00:53:10.680 the

00:53:10.740 most

00:53:10.920 famous

00:53:11.440 medical

00:53:12.700 experts

00:53:13.180 in

00:53:13.360 the

00:53:13.460 world

00:53:13.680 and

00:53:14.060 I

00:53:14.160 think

00:53:14.300 the

00:53:14.440 president

00:53:14.780 should

00:53:15.100 say

00:53:15.340 some

00:53:15.640 version

00:53:15.980 of

00:53:16.180 this

00:53:16.460 I'm

00:53:17.340 too

00:53:17.560 close

00:53:17.940 to

00:53:18.100 this

00:53:18.440 I'm

00:53:19.700 just

00:53:19.840 too

00:53:20.060 close

00:53:20.360 to

00:53:20.520 it

00:53:20.640 it's

00:53:20.820 too

00:53:20.980 personal

00:53:21.420 I

00:53:22.280 lost

00:53:22.560 my

00:53:22.780 brother

00:53:23.080 to

00:53:23.360 alcohol

00:53:24.740 I

00:53:26.320 would

00:53:26.580 I'm

00:53:27.000 not

00:53:27.180 the

00:53:27.340 one

00:53:27.560 who

00:53:27.740 can

00:53:27.860 make

00:53:28.040 a

00:53:28.160 decision

00:53:28.500 on

00:53:28.760 this

00:53:29.000 so

00:53:29.760 I

00:53:29.920 recuse

00:53:30.400 myself

00:53:30.840 I

00:53:32.080 realize

00:53:32.480 it's

00:53:32.720 my

00:53:32.900 decision

00:53:33.300 to

00:53:33.500 make

00:53:33.840 but

00:53:35.020 I

00:53:35.180 have

00:53:35.380 to

00:53:35.540 recuse

00:53:35.900 myself

00:53:36.320 because

00:53:36.580 I

00:53:36.720 can't

00:53:36.960 be

00:53:37.080 objective

00:53:37.520 on

00:53:37.760 this

00:53:37.960 question

00:53:38.440 so

00:53:39.100 I'm

00:53:39.240 going

00:53:39.320 to

00:53:39.420 delegate

00:53:39.720 it

00:53:44.440 Ben

00:53:44.700 Carson

00:53:45.040 now

00:53:45.660 it's

00:53:45.840 kind

00:53:46.040 of

00:53:46.140 a

00:53:46.280 twofer

00:53:46.620 if

00:53:47.040 you

00:53:47.180 haven't

00:53:47.640 figured

00:53:48.420 this

00:53:48.680 out

00:53:48.860 on

00:53:48.980 your

00:53:49.100 own

00:53:49.300 you

00:53:50.400 may

00:53:50.620 be

00:53:50.780 aware

00:53:51.000 that

00:53:51.180 Ben

00:53:51.380 Carson

00:53:51.660 is

00:53:51.840 black

00:53:52.200 I

00:53:52.900 think

00:53:53.040 most

00:53:53.280 of

00:53:53.380 you

00:53:53.440 knew

00:53:53.560 that

00:53:53.820 and

00:53:55.240 you

00:53:55.600 may

00:53:55.760 also

00:53:56.020 be

00:53:56.200 aware

00:53:56.480 that

00:53:56.740 especially

00:53:57.120 with

00:53:57.680 the

00:53:57.900 conversation

00:53:58.480 about

00:53:58.740 stop

00:53:59.100 and

00:53:59.260 frisk

00:53:59.640 and

00:53:59.900 a

00:54:00.860 lot

00:54:01.020 of

00:54:01.160 African

00:54:01.480 American

00:54:01.840 young

00:54:02.180 men

00:54:02.400 being

00:54:02.660 arrested

00:54:03.020 for

00:54:03.380 minor

00:54:03.800 marijuana

00:54:04.340 possession

00:54:04.800 that's

00:54:05.440 part

00:54:05.640 of

00:54:05.740 the

00:54:05.940 whole

00:54:06.420 Bloomberg

00:54:06.780 story

00:54:07.520 he

00:54:07.700 has

00:54:07.860 to

00:54:07.980 explain

00:54:08.280 away

00:54:08.560 wouldn't

00:54:10.080 it

00:54:10.200 be

00:54:10.480 the

00:54:11.260 most

00:54:11.600 credible

00:54:12.260 thing

00:54:12.580 you

00:54:12.740 could

00:54:12.920 do

00:54:13.260 to

00:54:14.560 have

00:54:14.760 the

00:54:14.920 recommendation

00:54:15.580 whatever

00:54:16.140 it is

00:54:16.880 I don't

00:54:17.400 know

00:54:17.540 what

00:54:17.700 Ben

00:54:17.920 Carson

00:54:18.500 would

00:54:18.700 recommend

00:54:19.080 but

00:54:20.040 wouldn't

00:54:20.560 the

00:54:20.760 best

00:54:21.060 recommendation

00:54:21.720 in terms

00:54:22.200 of

00:54:22.360 credibility

00:54:22.880 be

00:54:23.900 from

00:54:24.340 a

00:54:24.820 famous

00:54:25.260 African

00:54:25.740 American

00:54:26.220 doctor

00:54:28.580 how do

00:54:30.860 you beat

00:54:31.080 that

00:54:31.440 because

00:54:32.640 I think

00:54:33.420 it has

00:54:33.680 more

00:54:33.940 impact

00:54:34.300 on the

00:54:34.600 African

00:54:34.900 American

00:54:36.040 community

00:54:36.640 and I

00:54:38.120 think

00:54:38.260 everybody

00:54:38.560 agrees

00:54:38.900 with

00:54:39.040 that

00:54:39.300 and

00:54:40.200 if

00:54:40.380 Trump

00:54:40.960 isn't

00:54:41.280 the

00:54:41.400 one

00:54:41.540 to

00:54:41.680 make

00:54:41.900 the

00:54:42.060 decision

00:54:42.480 well

00:54:43.600 do

00:54:43.860 it

00:54:43.980 the

00:54:44.080 way

00:54:44.200 a

00:54:44.320 manager

00:54:44.660 would

00:54:44.920 do

00:54:45.040 it

00:54:45.120 you

00:54:45.220 would

00:54:45.360 delegate

00:54:45.620 it

00:54:45.920 if

00:54:46.320 you

00:54:46.760 can't

00:54:47.080 do

00:54:47.240 it

00:54:47.380 delegate

00:54:47.720 it

00:54:48.000 and

00:54:48.440 he

00:54:48.600 has

00:54:48.840 the

00:54:49.200 perfect

00:54:49.640 person

00:54:50.000 to

00:54:50.200 delegate

00:54:50.500 it

00:54:50.680 to

00:54:50.900 now

00:54:51.600 again

00:54:52.060 I

00:54:52.280 don't

00:54:52.400 know

00:54:52.520 what

00:54:52.640 Ben

00:54:52.840 Carson's

00:54:53.280 opinions

00:54:53.560 are

00:54:53.920 but

00:54:54.440 that's

00:54:54.720 the

00:54:55.300 beauty

00:54:55.540 of

00:54:55.720 it

00:54:55.920 do

00:54:56.620 you

00:54:56.740 think

00:54:56.980 Ben

00:54:57.280 Carson

00:54:57.580 makes

00:54:57.900 decisions

00:54:58.460 without

00:54:58.760 looking at

00:54:59.440 the

00:54:59.900 science

00:55:00.400 I doubt

00:55:01.300 it

00:55:01.520 do

00:55:01.980 you

00:55:02.060 think

00:55:02.200 Ben

00:55:02.420 Carson

00:55:02.680 makes

00:55:02.960 decisions

00:55:03.460 without

00:55:03.760 looking at

00:55:04.500 the

00:55:04.640 full

00:55:04.880 field

00:55:05.340 everything

00:55:06.680 from the

00:55:07.160 politics

00:55:07.540 to the

00:55:08.140 science

00:55:08.740 to the

00:55:09.060 medical

00:55:09.340 part

00:55:09.680 to the

00:55:10.160 social

00:55:10.880 elements

00:55:11.420 I think

00:55:12.100 he sees

00:55:12.480 the whole

00:55:12.760 field

00:55:13.080 he'd be

00:55:14.780 perfect

00:55:15.140 now

00:55:16.180 in

00:55:17.760 my

00:55:19.580 perfect

00:55:21.180 world

00:55:21.640 Trump

00:55:22.320 would

00:55:22.520 delegate

00:55:22.860 it

00:55:23.120 take

00:55:23.360 himself

00:55:23.680 out

00:55:23.880 of

00:55:23.980 the

00:55:24.100 decision

00:55:24.500 Ben

00:55:25.320 Carson

00:55:25.600 would

00:55:25.840 look

00:55:26.040 into

00:55:26.280 it

00:55:26.500 probably

00:55:27.540 would

00:55:27.880 say

00:55:28.060 let's

00:55:28.380 get

00:55:28.540 the

00:55:28.760 federal

00:55:29.100 government

00:55:29.500 out

00:55:29.760 of

00:55:29.860 this

00:55:30.040 business

00:55:30.480 probably

00:55:31.540 wouldn't

00:55:31.920 say

00:55:32.160 he's

00:55:32.460 in

00:55:32.600 favor

00:55:32.860 of

00:55:33.020 marijuana

00:55:33.400 I

00:55:34.080 assume

00:55:34.360 I

00:55:34.900 think

00:55:35.080 he

00:55:35.200 would

00:55:35.300 just

00:55:35.440 say

00:55:35.560 let's

00:55:35.780 get

00:55:35.920 the

00:55:36.080 federal

00:55:36.380 government

00:55:36.760 out

00:55:37.040 of

00:55:37.120 this

00:55:37.280 business

00:55:37.700 states

00:55:38.700 got

00:55:39.000 this

00:55:39.400 and

00:55:40.560 that

00:55:41.720 would

00:55:41.860 just

00:55:42.000 be

00:55:42.120 a win

00:55:42.380 best

00:55:43.840 idea

00:55:44.120 if you

00:55:44.300 ever

00:55:44.480 heard

00:55:44.760 somebody

00:55:47.960 says

00:55:48.320 it's

00:55:48.580 a

00:55:48.700 horrible

00:55:49.000 image

00:55:49.520 somebody

00:55:49.980 is

00:55:50.160 characterizing

00:55:50.880 what I

00:55:51.260 said

00:55:51.500 as

00:55:51.800 he's

00:55:52.440 black

00:55:52.820 so he

00:55:53.200 knows

00:55:53.460 drugs

00:55:53.840 best

00:55:54.280 did I

00:55:55.360 say

00:55:55.580 anything

00:55:55.860 like

00:55:56.160 that

00:55:56.460 did I

00:55:58.020 just

00:55:58.220 say

00:55:58.520 that

00:55:59.460 Ben

00:55:59.680 Carson

00:56:00.000 knows

00:56:00.600 the

00:56:00.780 most

00:56:01.000 about

00:56:01.240 drugs

00:56:01.560 because

00:56:01.900 he's

00:56:02.140 black

00:56:02.520 I

00:56:03.080 said

00:56:03.260 nothing

00:56:03.540 like

00:56:03.840 that

00:56:04.140 I'll

00:56:05.280 tell

00:56:05.400 you

00:56:05.500 what

00:56:05.680 Ben

00:56:06.080 Carson

00:56:06.400 does

00:56:06.780 know

00:56:07.000 more

00:56:07.260 about

00:56:07.600 he

00:56:08.220 knows

00:56:08.420 more

00:56:08.620 about

00:56:08.860 being

00:56:09.060 black

00:56:09.500 than

00:56:09.720 somebody

00:56:10.000 who

00:56:10.120 isn't

00:56:10.280 black

00:56:10.740 he

00:56:11.500 knows

00:56:11.700 more

00:56:11.900 about

00:56:12.100 being

00:56:12.240 a

00:56:12.440 doctor

00:56:12.800 he

00:56:13.780 knows

00:56:13.940 more

00:56:14.140 about

00:56:14.360 politics

00:56:14.920 than

00:56:15.180 people

00:56:15.500 who

00:56:15.660 are

00:56:15.700 not

00:56:15.880 involved

00:56:16.260 in

00:56:16.420 politics

00:56:16.780 he

00:56:17.040 knows

00:56:17.200 more

00:56:17.380 about

00:56:17.580 the

00:56:17.740 Trump

00:56:17.940 administration

00:56:18.560 than

00:56:18.840 people

00:56:19.060 who

00:56:19.160 are

00:56:19.220 not

00:56:19.400 involved

00:56:19.760 with

00:56:19.920 it

00:56:20.080 so

00:56:21.220 that's

00:56:22.720 that

00:56:22.960 let me

00:56:24.500 see if I

00:56:24.840 hit all

00:56:25.140 my

00:56:25.480 points

00:56:26.800 I

00:56:28.580 think

00:56:28.780 it

00:56:28.920 did

00:56:29.160 I

00:56:29.980 think

00:56:30.160 it

00:56:30.300 did

00:56:30.540 and

00:56:34.300 that's

00:56:36.140 all we

00:56:36.420 have

00:56:36.640 for

00:56:36.800 today

00:56:37.100 and

00:56:37.880 let's

00:56:38.120 go

00:56:38.360 forward

00:56:39.020 and

00:56:39.220 have

00:56:39.360 a

00:56:39.480 great

00:56:39.680 day

00:56:39.980 and

00:56:42.060 being

00:56:42.440 and

00:56:44.060 having

00:56:45.380 such

00:56:45.980 a

00:56:46.080 great

00:56:46.240 simultaneous

00:56:46.760 sip

00:56:47.020 it's

00:56:47.160 going

00:56:47.280 to

00:56:47.300 be

00:56:47.420 a

00:56:47.520 great

00:56:47.640 one

00:56:47.820 talk

00:56:48.560 to

00:56:48.660 you

00:56:48.740 tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 12, 2020

Episode 817 Scott Adams： Who REALLY Won in New Hampshire, New Stupid Attack on Trump

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript