Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 12, 2020


Episode 817 Scott Adams: Who REALLY Won in New Hampshire, New Stupid Attack on Trump


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

150.43298

Word Count

8,547

Sentence Count

390

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

Scott Adams and DJ Dr. Funk Juice discuss the latest in the anti-Trump war against President Trump and his supporters. Plus, a new story about a man who tried to kill a bunch of Trump supporters, and a new piece from CNN's Stephen Collins on why people hate Trump.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 What time is it? Does anybody know what time it is? Let me check. Oh, it's time for the simultaneous sip. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams, DJ Dr. Funk Juice. You know what time it is. Yes, you do.
00:00:23.780 It's time for the simultaneous sip, and all you need is really not much. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen drink or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:39.200 And get ready for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's a beverage that is spewing hearts. I think, if I've got my left and right correct, hearts coming out of my cup. Look at that. Oh, cool illusion, eh? And get ready for the simultaneous sip. It happens now.
00:01:02.680 Hmm. Hmm. I realize if you're watching this on YouTube later, where we upload it or on podcast, what I said about the cup full of hearts makes no sense in your world. But remember, we're all watching two movies on one screen. So don't be surprised if what you see is different from what other people see.
00:01:27.620 So, in no particular order, you know that gigantic story about the anti-Trump guy who tried to massacre a bunch of Trump volunteers? You know the thing that everybody's talking about? It's a gigantic story. I mean, why wouldn't it be? There's somebody who tried to massacre a bunch of Trump supporters. Oh, wait, it's not a national story. It's kind of a little blip.
00:01:55.200 Sure, sure, it was mentioned. The guy that got lost in the wash. That's right. There's somebody who tried to murder Trump supporters. Didn't try to kill a leader. Tried to kill ordinary voters who were just registering people to vote. They weren't causing trouble.
00:02:18.080 So that's where the rhetoric against Trump supporters. Somebody actually tried to kill them. Amazing. We'll get to New Hampshire. I'm just letting people pile in here. My favorite pundit, and I say favorite because he's so absurd, is this Stephen Collins guy who writes an anti-Trump article for CNN.com just about every day.
00:02:48.080 And here's how he's trying to create the newest frame in which people can find a way to hate Trump because they're running out of ways. It's like, oh, he's colluding with the Russians. Okay, he's not. He did something terribly impeachable. Okay, it wasn't that impeachable. It was, you know, closer to a perfect letter than impeachable.
00:03:09.840 So they're desperately cycling through. Well, he doesn't seem like he's actually insane. So here's what they've lit on. And you can see that Stephen Collins is sort of, I think, maybe testing the water with this.
00:03:26.240 So here's the approach. A quote from his article. The sudden storm over Stone, so talking about Roger Stone and possible pardon, triggered by an early hours tweet by the president is part of an accelerated pattern of unmoderated behavior since Trump was found not guilty of impeachable, wait, of impeachable offenses.
00:03:48.240 Wait a minute. He was found not guilty of impeachable offenses? That's a wrong sentence, isn't it? Wasn't he found not guilty?
00:04:00.100 If they were impeachable offenses, that would suggest that it was just a mistake and he was actually guilty. I like how you sort of stick that in there so you uncritically read it as though it was a travesty of justice.
00:04:16.740 Yeah, so there were impeachable defenses, but inexplicably he wasn't impeached. How do you explain it? It's hard to explain.
00:04:23.340 Anyway, so some of whom express the hope that the scar of impeachment, the scar of impeachment, the red letter I that's now burned on his chest, he will forever suffer the scar of impeachment.
00:04:42.640 I haven't noticed. I haven't noticed. It must be like a little scar that's maybe underneath his arm here where you don't see it. I mean, there might be a scar of impeachment on Trump, but I haven't seen it yet. It must be very small and covered with clothing.
00:05:01.120 But anyway, it looks like the new attack against Trump is that he's unleashed. He's going to be, no longer can his dictatorial impulses be controlled. He can't be controlled. He's Godzilla. No, he can't be Godzilla. Somebody else is Godzilla.
00:05:21.600 So it feels like not the strongest attack because it, I don't know, it just doesn't ring true. But they're trying desperately to find something that connects as a criticism.
00:05:35.100 All right, one of the big stories from last night is that Yang is out. Andrew Yang has dropped out of the race, did not really get the support that he needed to continue.
00:05:47.180 But I would like to join all of you in thanking Andrew Yang. And I think most of you would agree with this. I think he made the race better. I think he made the conversation in the United States about the topics that he was pushing, UBI, robots are coming for your jobs, etc.
00:06:07.260 I think he added real, genuine, which is the same as real. He really upgraded the conversation. Now, he didn't quite make it to the final three, but he certainly changed the conversation.
00:06:24.940 And I think it might be a permanent kind of shift in our thinking. And he was fun. He was great for Asian Americans because he got as far as he did.
00:06:35.340 So everything about him was good. It was a very positive experience. So thank you, Andrew Yang, for being a good American. A great American. One of the best. So thanks for that.
00:06:48.460 One of the things that one of my Twitter friends noted is that he had a little program that I was not aware of.
00:06:56.620 And I thought I'd give it a shout out because it was interesting. It was basically a student exchange program within the United States, which is not the worst idea I've ever heard of.
00:07:08.780 So normally you do the student exchanges with other countries so that you both get a little flavor of what the other country is about.
00:07:16.320 It's good in the long run for, you know, peaceful relationships and understanding and all that.
00:07:21.100 But I guess Yang was suggesting that we do it within the United States so that people would get out of their little bubble of their neighborhood or their culture and see what it's like somewhere else.
00:07:30.400 It's actually a really good. That's a really good suggestion. Let's keep that one out there.
00:07:34.460 All right. So thanks, Andrew Yang. Let's talk about the the other candidates and where we're at.
00:07:44.140 Now, if I had to pick one variable that makes the most difference in who's going to win the presidency, I would say the economy.
00:07:54.320 Now, President Trump has a incredible lead in the economy, you know, meaning that he's an incumbent over one.
00:08:02.560 Well, well, maybe the best economy we've ever had. And sure, sure, you can say, oh, Obama had better stats and this or that, or it's just a continuation of Obama.
00:08:12.240 And people will say that. But still, when things are going well in the economy is a super strong indicator.
00:08:18.680 But the second big variable in a world of many variables, the two that stick out are the black vote and economics.
00:08:30.600 So if President Trump looked good on those two things, you'd have to look for some kind of a special situation to take him out.
00:08:40.840 Because those are the by far the two most commanding variables, not the only variables.
00:08:46.440 And there could be lots of surprises between now and Election Day.
00:08:50.320 But these are very predictive.
00:08:51.720 So let's look at how the other candidates look on those two variables and some others.
00:08:59.380 And let's talk about matchup.
00:09:01.880 What is Trump's biggest negative?
00:09:05.420 His biggest negative.
00:09:06.860 You could say there are two.
00:09:09.760 I'd say two of his biggest negatives are the deficit.
00:09:14.600 That Trump is not as good on reducing the deficit as even his own side would like.
00:09:22.220 And certainly, you know, the people who oppose him would use that as a club.
00:09:27.780 But he's running against people who are going to make the deficit worse.
00:09:31.480 And they're not even pretending that's not the case.
00:09:34.540 They're not even pretending.
00:09:36.320 If you look at Bernie Sanders, is he going to make the deficit better or worse?
00:09:40.560 Well, I think you know the answer to the question.
00:09:42.720 That's not even a political opinion.
00:09:45.300 I believe Sanders would probably say the same thing I'm saying, which is, yeah, you know,
00:09:50.380 this stuff is more expensive than what we're doing now.
00:09:53.800 So, of course, it's going to make the deficit go up.
00:09:55.660 So, even if you increase taxes a lot, most people think the deficit is going to go up under Sanders.
00:10:05.440 So, I think President Trump's biggest weakness, one of them, the deficit, the Democrats can't use.
00:10:13.560 It's off the table.
00:10:14.420 It's his biggest flaw that's not about his personality, you know, his personal style.
00:10:20.180 But his biggest flaw that's on policy, they got nobody.
00:10:25.340 They got nobody who's going to do anything.
00:10:27.380 Now, maybe, you know, maybe when Bloomberg gets into the race, you know, in the actual voting part of the race,
00:10:38.380 maybe it would look different.
00:10:40.000 But even he's looking to reduce, you know, to be very aggressive on climate change.
00:10:45.660 It's hard to imagine that anybody who's going to be super aggressive on climate change is also going to be good for the deficit.
00:10:53.800 So, they got nothing against him on the deficit.
00:10:56.460 He's completely free from that criticism, essentially.
00:11:01.160 And what about the black vote?
00:11:04.080 We'll go through each of the candidates and talk about that.
00:11:07.100 I think that's the other biggest thing.
00:11:10.540 So, I saw on some blog that black support for Bernie plunged to 8%.
00:11:17.380 What? 8%?
00:11:21.500 Now, I don't know how they measure such things.
00:11:24.100 Because if 8% is just the share he got from, you know, the other Democrats,
00:11:29.320 I don't know if it means the same as if you were running in the general election,
00:11:33.460 he's obviously going to get more than 8% black support.
00:11:35.900 But the real thing is that it looks like it reduced by half recently.
00:11:43.500 Now, I'm not sure if you can trust the statistics on any of this stuff yet,
00:11:47.760 the way they ask the questions, the earliness of it all, that sort of thing.
00:11:51.220 But it does seem like Sanders does not have some advantage with the black vote.
00:11:59.080 So, that would be advantage Trump, because Trump has an actual track record in office
00:12:03.540 that even Democrats say, oh, I've got to admit, that's pretty good for the black community.
00:12:08.860 Everything from supporting the historically black colleges, prison reform, enterprise zones,
00:12:17.460 and good employment rates.
00:12:20.520 And I don't think you can underestimate how important it is
00:12:25.380 that Trump talks about benefiting the black community more than anybody.
00:12:31.000 Am I wrong about that?
00:12:32.720 If you were to just look at all the things that people say,
00:12:37.500 all of the Democrats collectively or individually,
00:12:40.420 and then look at all the things that President Trump says,
00:12:43.920 which of them talks more about benefiting the black community in this country?
00:12:51.180 I think it's Trump 10 to 1.
00:12:54.820 I don't think it's even close.
00:12:56.800 Name the other big policy that any of the Democrats have
00:13:00.280 for helping the black community.
00:13:03.620 Um, nothing?
00:13:07.240 Am I wrong that I can't think of one?
00:13:09.660 I can't think of a single Democratic candidate,
00:13:13.120 and there are so many of them,
00:13:14.540 who have a policy that I would identify as,
00:13:17.280 oh, yeah, that's clearly, you know,
00:13:19.360 designed for the benefit of the black community.
00:13:22.940 I don't, I think, I think Trump is actually saying the most,
00:13:27.340 as well as, oh, somebody said Steyer,
00:13:29.840 and, um, and reparations.
00:13:32.900 But I don't know if anybody takes that seriously, do they?
00:13:36.340 Do you think there are too many black voters who think,
00:13:39.680 yeah, I'm going to get me some reparations?
00:13:42.220 I don't think anybody thinks that's real.
00:13:44.940 That's more of a talking thing.
00:13:48.400 Anyway, so I think, uh,
00:13:50.520 Bernie's got a problem there with the black vote.
00:13:52.860 Lloyd Blankenfein, ex-Goldman Sachs CEO,
00:13:58.620 was tweeting this.
00:14:00.420 And this is important because he's a rich Democrat, right?
00:14:04.620 He's a rich non-Trump supporter.
00:14:08.260 So a rich Democrat, one of the richest,
00:14:11.520 says in a tweet,
00:14:12.520 if Dems go on to nominate Sanders,
00:14:15.400 the Russians will have to reconsider who to work for
00:14:18.420 to best screw up the U.S., he tweeted.
00:14:23.120 Uh, um,
00:14:24.500 and then he said, uh,
00:14:26.400 Sanders is just as polarizing as Trump,
00:14:28.860 and he'll ruin our economy,
00:14:30.820 and doesn't care about our military.
00:14:33.480 If I'm Russian,
00:14:34.640 I go with Sanders this time around.
00:14:38.160 What about,
00:14:39.000 I mean,
00:14:41.900 right?
00:14:43.460 And this is a Democrat saying that.
00:14:45.860 And I've got a feeling that rich people,
00:14:48.060 what they're maybe really worried about
00:14:50.160 is their taxes and their economic situation.
00:14:53.020 But that's a pretty strong broadside
00:14:56.500 from a rich Democrat,
00:14:58.520 and I've got to think there are other rich Democrats
00:15:01.060 who have the same opinion.
00:15:03.020 Now, if,
00:15:04.020 let's say one of the,
00:15:05.020 uh,
00:15:05.320 the Bernie or one of the super socialists,
00:15:07.820 the ones who are more socialist,
00:15:10.540 gets nominated.
00:15:12.200 There's a gigantic attack vector there.
00:15:16.080 I don't even know if that makes sense.
00:15:17.720 An attack vector?
00:15:19.480 Let's assume that made sense.
00:15:21.340 That Trump has available to him
00:15:23.320 that he hasn't really busted out yet.
00:15:25.640 Could be he's just waiting for the right time
00:15:27.620 to take out the Gatlin gun.
00:15:30.120 But,
00:15:31.000 and it goes like this,
00:15:32.500 and I've told you this before.
00:15:33.460 When the economy is working really,
00:15:35.820 really well,
00:15:37.000 as it is in the opinion of most citizens
00:15:39.540 right now,
00:15:40.900 you don't add risk.
00:15:42.860 You don't completely change something
00:15:44.560 that's working well,
00:15:45.780 and that's what Bernie and Elizabeth Warren
00:15:48.300 and the other socialist-leaning ones
00:15:50.180 want to do.
00:15:51.680 Trump has not tried to doubt that argument yet,
00:15:55.380 that you don't break something
00:15:56.700 that isn't broken,
00:15:58.080 or you don't fix something
00:15:59.240 that isn't broken.
00:16:00.020 And when he does,
00:16:01.980 that's sort of the end of it,
00:16:03.540 because older people are the voters,
00:16:05.700 more so than the young.
00:16:07.820 Bernie seems to have captured
00:16:09.660 the support of all the people
00:16:11.880 who are least likely to vote.
00:16:15.040 The youth,
00:16:16.400 people who are young
00:16:17.340 and don't have health care.
00:16:19.280 I think they're the least likely to vote.
00:16:21.680 Can somebody fact-check that?
00:16:24.660 Whereas Trump has a natural constituency,
00:16:28.020 even more so than ever,
00:16:30.640 of people who just say,
00:16:32.280 okay, I'm old,
00:16:33.380 don't rock the boat,
00:16:34.480 things are going okay.
00:16:36.840 Trump owns the
00:16:38.260 things are going okay,
00:16:39.500 let's not change it group,
00:16:40.880 and that's all the seniors.
00:16:43.180 So,
00:16:43.940 good job Bernie
00:16:45.860 in getting such vocal support
00:16:48.540 from people who probably
00:16:49.540 don't vote that much.
00:16:51.020 That's going to cost him.
00:16:52.140 All right.
00:16:56.260 Bernie Sanders hired a band
00:16:58.480 for his last campaign event.
00:17:02.000 The name of the band,
00:17:03.400 and I'm not making this up,
00:17:05.980 what are the odds
00:17:06.900 that Bernie Sanders
00:17:08.280 would hire a band
00:17:09.740 to perform at his event,
00:17:11.800 and the name of the band
00:17:12.860 would be
00:17:13.520 The Strokes?
00:17:16.920 Come on.
00:17:17.960 One of two things
00:17:20.980 is possible.
00:17:22.100 Either the person
00:17:22.920 that I named
00:17:23.560 The Mole
00:17:24.280 is working for Bernie,
00:17:26.440 meaning secretly
00:17:27.460 giving him bad advice
00:17:28.800 and doing all the wrong things
00:17:30.440 in his social media.
00:17:31.880 I don't think
00:17:32.500 such a person
00:17:33.100 really exists,
00:17:33.920 but it's fun
00:17:34.380 to think about it.
00:17:35.360 Because when you see him
00:17:36.340 do stuff like this,
00:17:37.140 you say to yourself,
00:17:38.300 that looks more
00:17:39.900 like a prank
00:17:41.420 than an actual thing
00:17:43.680 that would just happen
00:17:44.420 naturally.
00:17:45.340 Now, of course,
00:17:45.800 it's a world full of coincidences,
00:17:47.600 as I tell you often,
00:17:48.840 and so if I had to guess,
00:17:50.020 of course,
00:17:50.400 it's just a coincidence.
00:17:51.960 But I think somebody
00:17:54.560 should have maybe said,
00:17:55.900 Bernie,
00:17:56.980 maybe we should not
00:17:58.840 associate with strokes.
00:18:02.160 Now, Bernie didn't have a stroke,
00:18:04.280 but you still think
00:18:05.140 of this cardiovascular system
00:18:07.040 as all one thing.
00:18:08.180 It sort of blends together
00:18:10.120 in people's minds
00:18:11.020 and reminds you
00:18:12.540 of his mortality.
00:18:15.800 People are all excited
00:18:16.660 about Buttigieg
00:18:17.740 because he has
00:18:20.280 so much support
00:18:21.020 and he's finished
00:18:22.500 one or two
00:18:23.160 in the first two events.
00:18:26.680 So, hey,
00:18:27.540 it's going to be all him, right?
00:18:29.320 Except that
00:18:30.100 we're going to run
00:18:31.380 into the states
00:18:32.680 that have an actual
00:18:33.660 minority population
00:18:35.000 for the first time.
00:18:36.900 And he's sort of
00:18:38.320 done already.
00:18:39.460 So I would say
00:18:40.080 that Buttigieg
00:18:40.640 is probably
00:18:41.760 90% certain,
00:18:44.720 I would say.
00:18:45.640 He's probably
00:18:46.280 a dead man walking
00:18:47.240 in terms of politics
00:18:49.140 because I think
00:18:50.200 as soon as he hits
00:18:50.960 the minority vote,
00:18:52.420 you're going to see
00:18:53.520 his strength
00:18:54.640 just evaporate.
00:18:56.340 So that's my prediction.
00:18:57.420 So I think
00:18:57.800 his ride
00:18:59.680 was exciting,
00:19:00.720 but he's sort of
00:19:01.660 closer to the end
00:19:03.120 of his ride
00:19:03.680 than the beginning.
00:19:06.140 Of course,
00:19:07.120 we need to talk
00:19:07.840 about
00:19:08.320 Biden.
00:19:10.360 So there are
00:19:13.240 two views
00:19:13.680 on Biden.
00:19:14.300 One is that
00:19:14.800 he had this
00:19:15.260 clever strategy
00:19:16.280 where he would
00:19:17.160 lose the first
00:19:17.840 two events,
00:19:18.860 but then he would
00:19:19.440 come back strong
00:19:20.340 once the states
00:19:22.660 with a bigger
00:19:23.120 minority population
00:19:24.180 were voting.
00:19:25.440 But it looks like
00:19:26.000 his support
00:19:27.000 has cratered.
00:19:29.100 And I think
00:19:30.220 that the first
00:19:31.260 two outcomes,
00:19:35.000 as somebody smart
00:19:36.100 once said,
00:19:37.340 black people
00:19:38.340 watch the news too.
00:19:39.340 It's one of those
00:19:42.000 dumb ideas.
00:19:44.140 And somebody said,
00:19:45.200 if you're a black
00:19:46.740 supporter of Biden,
00:19:48.660 let's say you've
00:19:49.120 been supporting him
00:19:50.000 when you answered
00:19:51.220 the pollsters
00:19:52.680 up until now,
00:19:54.580 you had your
00:19:55.420 television on
00:19:56.280 or you heard the
00:19:58.280 news one way
00:19:59.020 or another,
00:19:59.700 you saw the news
00:20:00.840 and you saw that
00:20:02.540 Joe Biden
00:20:03.620 doesn't have
00:20:04.300 white support.
00:20:05.920 He doesn't have
00:20:06.680 white support.
00:20:07.940 So if you're a
00:20:08.780 black supporter,
00:20:09.340 are you going to
00:20:11.300 climb on a horse
00:20:12.080 that doesn't have
00:20:12.680 white support
00:20:13.480 in the United
00:20:14.160 States?
00:20:15.500 That's sort of
00:20:16.460 a problem.
00:20:18.760 So I think
00:20:19.780 the rational
00:20:21.740 black voters
00:20:22.460 who are paying
00:20:23.000 attention are
00:20:24.080 saying,
00:20:24.580 I think I'd
00:20:26.560 rather be with
00:20:27.460 somebody who
00:20:28.500 could get a
00:20:29.140 white vote
00:20:30.160 because I'm
00:20:31.360 going to meet
00:20:31.740 a few of those
00:20:32.540 if I want to
00:20:33.440 be on the
00:20:34.220 winning team.
00:20:34.700 so I would
00:20:36.880 agree with
00:20:37.400 the pundits
00:20:38.740 who are now
00:20:39.160 saying that
00:20:39.640 Biden is
00:20:40.280 completely done
00:20:41.180 and it's
00:20:41.640 just a matter
00:20:42.320 of time
00:20:42.680 before he
00:20:43.200 finds the
00:20:43.840 most graceful
00:20:44.500 way to
00:20:44.880 make his
00:20:45.920 exit.
00:20:46.660 Now I would
00:20:47.260 like to claim
00:20:47.940 partial credit
00:20:49.140 for predicting
00:20:50.080 how many
00:20:51.520 people,
00:20:52.380 I think a lot
00:20:53.220 of you were
00:20:53.620 with me here,
00:20:54.560 how many
00:20:54.960 people from
00:20:56.100 the very
00:20:56.540 beginning when
00:20:57.480 Biden was
00:20:58.100 the overwhelming
00:20:58.840 polling favorite,
00:21:01.560 how many
00:21:02.000 people said
00:21:02.720 as clearly
00:21:03.380 as I did
00:21:04.040 he's not
00:21:04.960 going to
00:21:05.160 make it
00:21:05.440 to the
00:21:05.700 nomination?
00:21:08.000 I've been
00:21:08.560 saying that
00:21:08.960 since the
00:21:09.300 beginning and
00:21:09.800 it was
00:21:10.000 because he
00:21:10.480 would falter,
00:21:11.200 he just
00:21:11.440 doesn't,
00:21:12.660 there's just
00:21:13.140 not enough
00:21:13.620 left of him
00:21:14.360 unfortunately,
00:21:15.240 age has
00:21:16.020 taken its
00:21:16.480 toll.
00:21:18.340 So now I
00:21:19.180 got the
00:21:19.560 Kamala Harris
00:21:20.160 thing completely
00:21:20.820 wrong,
00:21:21.200 so I
00:21:22.200 don't want
00:21:22.440 to brag
00:21:22.800 too much
00:21:23.380 about the
00:21:24.320 Biden part
00:21:24.940 and if
00:21:26.320 Biden is
00:21:26.780 completely out
00:21:27.400 which I
00:21:27.920 assume will
00:21:28.320 be the
00:21:28.580 case,
00:21:30.640 alas,
00:21:32.240 I suppose
00:21:32.880 he could
00:21:33.160 throw a
00:21:33.500 Hail Mary
00:21:33.940 and say
00:21:34.380 you know,
00:21:35.200 let me
00:21:35.680 tell you
00:21:36.000 who my
00:21:36.300 vice
00:21:36.540 president
00:21:36.880 would be
00:21:37.380 and look
00:21:37.920 at me
00:21:38.140 again.
00:21:38.940 So he
00:21:39.380 does have
00:21:39.780 that play
00:21:40.340 to name
00:21:41.780 a vice
00:21:42.100 president,
00:21:42.620 but we
00:21:42.820 haven't
00:21:43.040 seen that
00:21:43.400 play ever
00:21:43.800 work for
00:21:44.460 anybody,
00:21:44.980 so I
00:21:45.780 think Biden's
00:21:46.280 done.
00:21:48.660 Let's
00:21:49.100 talk about
00:21:49.460 Klobuchar.
00:21:51.200 Klobuchar
00:21:52.260 in my
00:21:53.420 opinion is
00:21:54.020 the big
00:21:54.420 winner and
00:21:55.820 I saw
00:21:56.420 some people
00:21:56.940 mocking the
00:21:59.260 idea that
00:21:59.820 she was the
00:22:00.360 big winner
00:22:00.760 because she
00:22:01.160 came in
00:22:01.480 third.
00:22:03.080 She came
00:22:03.660 in third.
00:22:04.660 How can
00:22:05.180 you be the
00:22:05.640 big winner
00:22:06.180 if two
00:22:07.280 people just
00:22:07.800 kicked your
00:22:08.420 butt and
00:22:09.300 came in
00:22:09.680 first and
00:22:10.080 second?
00:22:10.860 And the
00:22:11.220 answer is
00:22:11.640 this,
00:22:12.320 how many
00:22:13.000 times have
00:22:13.500 I told
00:22:13.880 you that
00:22:15.360 the direction
00:22:16.000 of things
00:22:16.600 matters more
00:22:17.380 than where
00:22:17.800 things are?
00:22:18.440 Where
00:22:19.500 things are
00:22:20.320 is that
00:22:21.540 Biden and
00:22:22.160 Buttigieg
00:22:22.640 just were
00:22:23.540 the two
00:22:24.080 highest vote
00:22:24.840 getters in
00:22:25.360 two events
00:22:25.840 in a row.
00:22:26.940 That's where
00:22:27.560 we are.
00:22:29.320 But where
00:22:29.760 are we
00:22:30.020 heading?
00:22:31.580 That's the
00:22:32.180 Klobuchar
00:22:32.560 story.
00:22:33.500 The Klobuchar
00:22:34.020 story is
00:22:34.820 that she
00:22:36.060 just got a
00:22:37.300 huge boost
00:22:38.120 and enough
00:22:40.160 so that she's
00:22:40.860 in the
00:22:41.100 serious competition,
00:22:42.680 enough people
00:22:43.240 are paying
00:22:43.600 attention.
00:22:44.860 Her finish
00:22:45.820 should make
00:22:46.400 all the people
00:22:46.980 who didn't
00:22:47.820 pay attention
00:22:48.340 to her
00:22:48.760 before
00:22:49.260 start paying
00:22:50.480 attention to
00:22:51.080 her.
00:22:51.600 But there's
00:22:52.080 a really
00:22:52.360 interesting
00:22:52.820 part of
00:22:53.900 the story.
00:22:55.820 Now,
00:22:56.560 if you
00:22:57.200 read my
00:22:57.640 book,
00:22:58.220 Winn
00:22:58.400 Bigley,
00:22:59.280 many of
00:22:59.780 you have,
00:23:00.920 you know
00:23:01.380 that sometimes
00:23:02.040 it's impossible
00:23:03.060 to tell
00:23:03.780 when something
00:23:05.660 happens by
00:23:06.220 coincidence
00:23:06.740 versus when
00:23:07.720 it has been
00:23:08.200 influenced by
00:23:09.180 some event.
00:23:10.360 You can't
00:23:10.640 really tell.
00:23:11.660 And so this
00:23:12.060 is part of
00:23:12.480 the fun.
00:23:14.160 It turns
00:23:14.760 out that
00:23:16.180 if you
00:23:17.400 looked at
00:23:17.740 the signs
00:23:18.360 her supporters,
00:23:19.360 Klobuchar's
00:23:19.960 supporters were
00:23:20.880 holding behind
00:23:21.560 her when she
00:23:22.020 gave her
00:23:22.360 speech,
00:23:23.660 I guess
00:23:24.740 they've
00:23:25.040 picked the
00:23:25.460 slogan,
00:23:26.780 Win
00:23:26.980 Big.
00:23:29.020 Win
00:23:29.620 Big.
00:23:31.900 That's the
00:23:32.660 Klobuchar
00:23:33.060 slogan.
00:23:36.340 Now,
00:23:37.400 Win
00:23:37.600 Bigley
00:23:38.080 comes loosely
00:23:40.280 from President
00:23:41.060 Trump.
00:23:42.040 Now,
00:23:42.380 I believe he
00:23:42.960 was saying
00:23:43.460 Win
00:23:43.920 Big
00:23:44.400 Liga,
00:23:46.500 but it
00:23:46.860 sounds like
00:23:47.360 Win
00:23:47.880 Bigley,
00:23:48.720 and so I
00:23:49.400 use that
00:23:49.880 humorously as
00:23:51.640 my book
00:23:52.020 title,
00:23:52.980 as if he
00:23:54.080 had been
00:23:54.420 saying
00:23:54.780 Bigley,
00:23:55.820 although
00:23:56.260 lately I
00:23:56.940 think he
00:23:57.180 does say
00:23:57.540 Bigley,
00:23:57.960 but that's
00:23:58.260 another story.
00:23:59.700 So here's,
00:24:00.640 and I've
00:24:01.420 told you
00:24:01.720 before,
00:24:02.940 now this
00:24:03.460 isn't the
00:24:03.900 first time
00:24:04.340 you're going
00:24:04.580 to hear
00:24:04.760 this.
00:24:05.180 If this
00:24:05.520 were the
00:24:05.920 first time
00:24:06.560 I ever
00:24:06.900 said what
00:24:07.320 I'm going
00:24:07.560 to say
00:24:07.800 now,
00:24:08.980 it would
00:24:09.300 sound a little,
00:24:09.980 you'd be a
00:24:10.400 little skeptical.
00:24:10.880 But I've
00:24:12.120 been saying
00:24:12.460 this for a
00:24:12.900 while.
00:24:13.660 I tell you
00:24:14.260 that one
00:24:14.780 of the
00:24:14.980 ways that
00:24:15.400 I trace
00:24:15.900 my own
00:24:16.640 persuasion
00:24:17.500 is by
00:24:18.800 choice of
00:24:19.360 words.
00:24:19.940 When you
00:24:20.480 see an
00:24:20.780 unusual
00:24:21.180 choice of
00:24:21.780 words migrate
00:24:23.140 from the
00:24:25.040 things I've
00:24:25.540 said or
00:24:26.020 written into
00:24:27.320 other people's
00:24:28.080 mouths or
00:24:28.680 their
00:24:28.940 presentation,
00:24:30.280 it doesn't
00:24:31.220 necessarily mean
00:24:32.360 that you
00:24:32.640 influence them,
00:24:33.940 but it's a
00:24:34.420 flag.
00:24:36.200 It's a
00:24:36.920 little signal.
00:24:37.560 And so
00:24:39.080 I say
00:24:40.000 it's very
00:24:40.940 interesting.
00:24:41.620 I wrote a
00:24:42.140 book with
00:24:43.640 all of the
00:24:44.280 best persuasion
00:24:45.200 techniques that
00:24:46.240 President Trump
00:24:46.940 used to win,
00:24:48.300 and it
00:24:48.960 becomes sort
00:24:49.560 of a manual
00:24:50.360 that any
00:24:50.920 candidate could
00:24:51.780 read to
00:24:53.040 improve their
00:24:53.840 persuasion.
00:24:55.540 And then I
00:24:56.220 see that
00:24:56.700 something very
00:24:57.480 close to the
00:24:58.160 title of my
00:24:58.740 book just
00:25:00.200 appeared on
00:25:00.700 the signs.
00:25:01.560 Now, I'm
00:25:02.080 not making
00:25:02.540 any claim that
00:25:03.220 they made
00:25:03.580 the signs
00:25:04.120 because of
00:25:05.000 my book.
00:25:05.500 at least
00:25:07.400 consciously.
00:25:09.220 Let me ask
00:25:10.000 you this.
00:25:11.300 Do you
00:25:11.640 think there's
00:25:12.140 anybody in
00:25:13.000 the Democratic
00:25:14.020 campaigns,
00:25:14.960 let's say
00:25:15.360 their campaign
00:25:15.940 staffs,
00:25:16.980 do you think
00:25:17.420 that any of
00:25:18.020 the Democrats
00:25:18.760 have anybody
00:25:20.240 on their
00:25:20.680 staffs who
00:25:22.340 have ever
00:25:22.720 read the
00:25:24.200 one book
00:25:24.780 that is
00:25:25.640 biased
00:25:26.040 design,
00:25:26.740 the most
00:25:27.040 helpful book
00:25:27.800 any of them
00:25:28.400 could read
00:25:28.960 for improving
00:25:30.200 their communication,
00:25:31.280 which is all
00:25:31.680 they're doing.
00:25:32.220 They're not
00:25:32.580 governing,
00:25:33.380 they're
00:25:33.800 communicating.
00:25:34.300 a campaign
00:25:35.460 is nothing
00:25:35.880 but,
00:25:36.480 well,
00:25:36.660 it's mostly
00:25:37.060 communicating
00:25:37.700 with a little
00:25:38.200 bit of
00:25:38.480 organization
00:25:39.020 in there.
00:25:41.000 So,
00:25:41.680 what are
00:25:42.360 the odds
00:25:42.820 that a
00:25:43.680 best-selling
00:25:44.160 book that
00:25:45.200 tells you
00:25:45.540 the best
00:25:45.900 way to
00:25:46.200 communicate
00:25:46.660 in a
00:25:47.740 political
00:25:48.100 context
00:25:48.820 would be
00:25:49.880 read by
00:25:50.300 people who
00:25:50.760 do that
00:25:51.060 for a
00:25:51.320 living
00:25:51.540 and read
00:25:52.460 books?
00:25:53.320 Pretty
00:25:53.820 well.
00:25:54.700 There's
00:25:55.000 a pretty
00:25:55.180 good chance
00:25:55.600 that some
00:25:56.140 of them
00:25:56.440 are familiar
00:25:57.340 with the
00:25:57.700 book.
00:25:59.060 But,
00:25:59.860 if it
00:26:00.680 were true
00:26:01.140 that
00:26:01.520 Klobuchar
00:26:02.120 had been
00:26:03.060 influenced,
00:26:04.620 or let's
00:26:05.120 say she
00:26:05.680 improved her
00:26:06.900 game by
00:26:07.320 reading my
00:26:07.760 book,
00:26:08.060 and I'm
00:26:08.260 not saying
00:26:08.580 that's the
00:26:08.960 case.
00:26:10.020 I'm saying
00:26:10.500 here's what
00:26:11.160 you would
00:26:11.440 look for.
00:26:12.900 What you
00:26:13.480 would look
00:26:13.840 for is
00:26:14.640 that the
00:26:15.000 technique in
00:26:15.640 the book
00:26:15.980 would start
00:26:16.420 coming out
00:26:17.020 in her
00:26:17.920 presentation
00:26:18.960 stronger than
00:26:20.740 you've seen
00:26:21.200 it before.
00:26:23.080 Did any of
00:26:23.860 you catch
00:26:24.280 her semi-victory
00:26:26.380 speech last
00:26:27.080 night in which
00:26:27.680 she was claiming
00:26:28.400 victory for coming
00:26:29.280 in third?
00:26:30.380 Did anybody
00:26:31.120 see that?
00:26:35.360 Somebody's
00:26:35.800 asking me if
00:26:36.380 I'm secretly
00:26:37.040 consulting
00:26:37.840 Klobuchar.
00:26:38.520 I'm not.
00:26:39.600 And I
00:26:40.000 wouldn't lie
00:26:40.360 to you about
00:26:40.740 that.
00:26:41.340 I would not
00:26:42.000 look you in
00:26:43.340 the eyes and
00:26:43.800 say I
00:26:44.280 have not
00:26:44.840 if I were
00:26:46.300 even doing
00:26:46.780 a little bit
00:26:47.840 or indirectly
00:26:48.520 or in any
00:26:49.040 way.
00:26:49.220 I'm not.
00:26:50.560 Nor am I
00:26:51.420 advising any
00:26:52.300 Democrat.
00:26:53.020 That's not
00:26:53.420 happening.
00:26:55.820 But if
00:26:56.760 you heard
00:26:57.220 her speech
00:26:58.000 speech, she
00:26:59.900 started out
00:27:00.580 with a
00:27:01.680 super visual
00:27:02.740 and emotional
00:27:03.680 story about
00:27:04.880 her grandparents,
00:27:06.220 you know,
00:27:06.480 coal miner,
00:27:07.800 you know,
00:27:08.420 picking up
00:27:09.600 his sister
00:27:10.200 from adoption
00:27:12.600 agency because
00:27:13.540 he had to
00:27:13.920 work when he
00:27:14.400 was a kid
00:27:14.960 and then
00:27:16.000 they worked
00:27:16.460 their way
00:27:16.800 up and
00:27:17.240 it was the
00:27:17.720 American dream,
00:27:18.680 et cetera.
00:27:19.720 And that
00:27:21.080 was a
00:27:21.540 super visual,
00:27:23.300 yeah, it
00:27:24.760 was a super
00:27:25.400 visual and
00:27:26.800 emotional
00:27:27.380 story.
00:27:29.640 What did
00:27:30.360 Van Jones
00:27:31.060 call out
00:27:31.660 after
00:27:32.180 Klobuchar
00:27:33.520 gave that?
00:27:34.940 Van Jones,
00:27:35.760 who I often
00:27:36.420 tell you is
00:27:37.000 sort of the
00:27:37.460 one-eyed,
00:27:38.740 he's the
00:27:39.200 one-eyed
00:27:39.580 Democrat in
00:27:40.380 the land
00:27:40.720 of the
00:27:41.000 blind,
00:27:42.160 just listen
00:27:43.320 to what he
00:27:43.800 says and
00:27:45.400 you're going
00:27:45.700 to get a
00:27:46.160 clearer view
00:27:47.080 of the
00:27:47.540 field than
00:27:48.340 what any
00:27:48.820 of the
00:27:49.040 other
00:27:49.240 pundits
00:27:49.560 say.
00:27:49.840 It's very
00:27:50.160 consistent.
00:27:51.000 He does
00:27:51.240 it just
00:27:51.980 every time.
00:27:53.320 His opinion
00:27:53.920 is just a
00:27:54.520 little more
00:27:54.960 clear, a
00:27:56.360 little more
00:27:56.780 on point
00:27:57.320 than just
00:27:57.740 about
00:27:57.960 everybody
00:27:58.360 who's
00:27:59.000 talking
00:27:59.240 about
00:27:59.440 this
00:27:59.620 stuff.
00:28:00.860 And one
00:28:02.060 of the
00:28:02.260 things that
00:28:02.680 Van Jones
00:28:03.140 pointed out
00:28:03.860 is how
00:28:04.740 good she
00:28:06.060 was with
00:28:06.640 story.
00:28:07.960 And he
00:28:08.160 was kind
00:28:09.600 of blown
00:28:09.920 away a
00:28:10.320 little bit
00:28:10.760 by the
00:28:12.280 quality of
00:28:13.160 her speech.
00:28:14.280 Have you
00:28:14.640 ever heard
00:28:15.140 that before?
00:28:16.320 Has anybody
00:28:16.980 ever said
00:28:17.640 that Klobuchar,
00:28:19.280 man, she
00:28:19.820 can give a
00:28:20.880 speech that
00:28:21.700 touches your
00:28:22.700 heartstrings?
00:28:23.260 I've never
00:28:23.860 heard it.
00:28:24.840 I've never
00:28:25.240 heard anybody
00:28:25.760 say, man,
00:28:26.560 Klobuchar,
00:28:27.540 what a
00:28:28.280 orator.
00:28:29.580 Her speaking
00:28:30.360 moves me.
00:28:32.140 Never heard
00:28:32.800 it before.
00:28:34.040 And then she
00:28:34.520 walked up on
00:28:35.180 stage yesterday
00:28:35.980 and she just
00:28:37.640 nailed it.
00:28:39.060 I watched
00:28:39.900 just the first
00:28:41.080 part of the
00:28:41.420 speech live
00:28:42.280 and I was
00:28:43.140 sitting there
00:28:43.540 thinking,
00:28:44.340 am I
00:28:45.240 imagining this
00:28:46.140 or is this
00:28:47.340 really good?
00:28:48.860 And then I
00:28:49.500 started looking
00:28:50.200 for the visual
00:28:50.920 elements.
00:28:51.800 She talked
00:28:52.280 about the
00:28:52.640 grandmother
00:28:53.060 packing a
00:28:53.760 lunch.
00:28:54.820 You can
00:28:55.160 see it,
00:28:55.620 can't you?
00:28:56.300 You can
00:28:56.620 see the
00:28:56.940 grandmother.
00:28:57.820 You can
00:28:58.120 see her
00:28:58.400 packing the
00:28:58.900 lunch.
00:28:59.740 Then she
00:29:00.040 talked about
00:29:00.480 the coal
00:29:00.880 miner who
00:29:01.480 went down
00:29:02.420 in a cage
00:29:03.020 into the
00:29:03.380 mine.
00:29:04.180 You could
00:29:04.620 see it.
00:29:06.020 You could
00:29:06.500 feel it.
00:29:07.800 You were
00:29:08.140 in the
00:29:08.420 mine with
00:29:09.080 her
00:29:09.220 grandfather.
00:29:10.480 You could
00:29:10.840 see the
00:29:11.720 grandfather
00:29:12.180 borrowed a
00:29:12.940 car to
00:29:14.080 drive to
00:29:14.560 get his
00:29:15.100 sister who
00:29:15.620 had been
00:29:15.880 put in an
00:29:16.260 orphanage
00:29:16.820 because they
00:29:19.400 didn't have
00:29:19.680 enough money
00:29:20.120 for all their
00:29:20.520 kids.
00:29:21.280 You could
00:29:21.580 see him
00:29:22.540 borrowing the
00:29:23.080 car.
00:29:24.000 You could
00:29:24.380 see him
00:29:24.780 driving the
00:29:25.400 car.
00:29:25.640 You could
00:29:25.880 see him
00:29:26.260 driving back
00:29:26.840 with his
00:29:27.320 sister.
00:29:28.080 It was
00:29:28.460 amazingly
00:29:29.000 visual.
00:29:30.480 So look
00:29:30.780 for that.
00:29:31.680 If it's
00:29:32.100 true, and
00:29:32.840 I'm not
00:29:33.140 saying it
00:29:33.520 is, but
00:29:34.720 there are
00:29:35.080 certainly
00:29:35.720 some bread
00:29:36.200 crumbs here
00:29:36.780 that would
00:29:37.760 suggest that
00:29:38.360 somebody on
00:29:38.860 the
00:29:39.000 cloberture
00:29:39.540 campaign has
00:29:41.300 figured out
00:29:42.000 a way to
00:29:42.780 be a lot
00:29:43.580 more persuasive.
00:29:44.540 Now I
00:29:45.760 would say
00:29:46.100 that I've
00:29:47.260 called
00:29:47.540 cloberture's
00:29:48.420 technique the
00:29:49.780 tortoise versus
00:29:50.720 the hares.
00:29:51.820 The other
00:29:52.340 candidates are
00:29:52.980 the hares.
00:29:54.420 The hares are
00:29:55.760 running fast and
00:29:56.640 burning brightly
00:29:57.300 and winning the
00:29:58.480 early stuff.
00:30:00.760 But cloberture
00:30:01.540 just keeps
00:30:02.880 tortoising
00:30:03.720 along.
00:30:05.080 Hey, what's
00:30:06.220 today?
00:30:06.840 Took another
00:30:07.360 step today.
00:30:08.760 How are you
00:30:09.560 guys doing?
00:30:10.000 Flaming out?
00:30:11.000 Getting in
00:30:11.640 trouble?
00:30:12.080 Saying things you
00:30:12.860 shouldn't say.
00:30:13.540 I'm just
00:30:13.980 climbing along
00:30:15.000 like a little
00:30:15.880 tortoise.
00:30:16.500 Do, do, do.
00:30:17.460 You can try to
00:30:18.300 hit me, but my
00:30:19.120 shell will
00:30:19.680 reject your
00:30:21.320 stuff.
00:30:23.140 And she
00:30:24.700 simply didn't
00:30:25.300 make mistakes,
00:30:26.500 right?
00:30:27.820 I apologize
00:30:28.880 for all my
00:30:29.680 nasal problems
00:30:31.100 live here.
00:30:32.300 I've got some
00:30:32.920 surgery lined
00:30:33.820 up to
00:30:34.780 roto-root my
00:30:36.080 nasal cavities
00:30:37.660 and then I
00:30:38.040 should be fine
00:30:38.520 after a while.
00:30:40.560 But it
00:30:42.120 seems to me
00:30:42.760 that cloberture
00:30:44.040 by simply
00:30:44.800 not drawing
00:30:46.640 attacks and
00:30:48.080 not making
00:30:48.700 any obvious
00:30:49.400 mistakes is
00:30:51.320 starting to get
00:30:51.980 a second look.
00:30:52.740 So the
00:30:53.040 tortoise
00:30:53.520 strategy looks
00:30:56.140 kind of good.
00:30:57.620 It looks
00:30:57.980 pretty strong.
00:30:59.440 Now here's the
00:31:00.000 other interesting
00:31:00.520 thing about
00:31:01.020 it.
00:31:01.160 What's the
00:31:01.740 big complaint
00:31:02.480 about Trump?
00:31:04.340 Usually it's
00:31:05.040 about his
00:31:05.480 being mean,
00:31:06.500 right?
00:31:07.020 He's mean.
00:31:08.140 He's mean.
00:31:08.900 He's a big
00:31:09.180 old meanie.
00:31:09.640 Trump is
00:31:11.140 most associated
00:31:11.900 with New
00:31:12.380 York City
00:31:12.880 even though
00:31:13.320 he's moved
00:31:13.920 his place
00:31:14.440 of residence.
00:31:15.860 We think
00:31:16.180 of Trump
00:31:16.760 as a New
00:31:17.300 Yorker
00:31:17.760 with a
00:31:18.280 sort of
00:31:19.840 a New
00:31:20.980 Yorker
00:31:21.660 personality,
00:31:22.800 a little
00:31:23.140 tougher,
00:31:24.020 more in
00:31:24.360 your face.
00:31:26.180 And then
00:31:26.380 there's
00:31:26.560 Klobuchar
00:31:26.960 who is
00:31:28.120 associated
00:31:28.620 with
00:31:28.900 Minnesota.
00:31:31.360 What is
00:31:31.940 Minnesota
00:31:32.480 most famous
00:31:33.580 for among
00:31:34.360 all the
00:31:35.040 states
00:31:35.380 and the
00:31:36.140 Union?
00:31:38.040 Now if
00:31:38.500 you didn't
00:31:38.760 know this
00:31:39.140 I'd be
00:31:39.420 surprised.
00:31:40.840 Minnesota
00:31:41.420 produces
00:31:42.720 the nicest
00:31:43.500 people in
00:31:44.400 the universe.
00:31:45.600 I don't
00:31:46.180 know why.
00:31:47.420 It just
00:31:47.800 does.
00:31:48.560 There's
00:31:48.840 something about
00:31:49.380 Minnesota
00:31:49.800 that produces
00:31:50.520 nice people
00:31:51.200 fairly
00:31:52.280 consistently.
00:31:53.480 So she
00:31:53.880 comes from
00:31:54.340 literally the
00:31:55.560 nicest state
00:31:56.700 that produces
00:31:57.820 for whatever
00:31:58.440 reason the
00:31:59.080 nicest people
00:31:59.920 personality
00:32:00.560 wise
00:32:00.920 against
00:32:02.440 the Trump
00:32:03.660 personality
00:32:04.180 who's sort
00:32:04.740 of the New
00:32:05.100 York
00:32:05.300 personality.
00:32:06.220 That's an
00:32:06.740 interesting
00:32:07.100 matchup
00:32:07.700 because there's
00:32:08.780 a pendulum
00:32:09.540 effect.
00:32:10.900 People might
00:32:11.760 want a
00:32:12.240 fighter until
00:32:13.480 they get a
00:32:14.160 little tired
00:32:14.580 of the
00:32:14.900 fighter and
00:32:16.160 then maybe
00:32:16.700 they need
00:32:17.020 somebody nice
00:32:17.640 after a
00:32:18.020 while.
00:32:18.800 So there's
00:32:19.120 certainly a
00:32:20.120 longing for
00:32:20.980 niceness that
00:32:22.620 makes her a
00:32:23.340 good matchup.
00:32:24.760 I don't know
00:32:25.340 that you could
00:32:25.860 beat the
00:32:26.200 president by
00:32:26.840 being more
00:32:27.660 of whatever
00:32:29.500 he is.
00:32:30.520 By being
00:32:31.340 more attacking
00:32:32.440 than he is.
00:32:33.100 I don't know
00:32:33.600 that you can
00:32:34.140 I don't know
00:32:35.320 that you can
00:32:35.740 over attack.
00:32:37.700 No you
00:32:38.080 could over
00:32:38.480 attack.
00:32:38.940 I don't
00:32:39.260 know that
00:32:39.500 you could
00:32:39.680 beat Trump
00:32:40.120 by being
00:32:40.940 more like
00:32:41.420 Trump.
00:32:42.400 I think you
00:32:43.000 have to
00:32:43.280 counter program
00:32:44.080 him with
00:32:44.500 something that's
00:32:45.040 also good
00:32:45.880 that's the
00:32:46.940 antidote to
00:32:47.640 Trump.
00:32:48.620 Klobuchar
00:32:49.000 has that.
00:32:50.540 She looks
00:32:51.000 like a
00:32:52.620 dependable
00:32:53.720 pair of
00:32:54.320 shoes
00:32:54.680 and she's
00:32:56.820 nice.
00:32:57.740 Now there's
00:32:58.360 these rumors
00:32:59.140 about eating
00:33:00.340 solid with
00:33:00.980 her comb
00:33:01.600 and all
00:33:01.840 that.
00:33:02.120 I don't
00:33:02.340 know if
00:33:02.580 any of
00:33:02.860 that's
00:33:03.140 going to
00:33:03.900 be a
00:33:04.200 problem.
00:33:04.740 It doesn't
00:33:05.060 seem to
00:33:05.360 be dogging
00:33:05.920 her.
00:33:06.840 So I
00:33:07.060 think that
00:33:07.380 will be
00:33:07.620 nothing.
00:33:09.440 So anyway
00:33:09.780 she's got a
00:33:11.040 lot going
00:33:11.320 on so let's
00:33:11.920 keep an eye
00:33:12.520 on her and
00:33:13.040 see if she's
00:33:13.560 learned to
00:33:14.000 persuade as
00:33:14.860 well as I
00:33:15.520 fear she
00:33:16.020 may have.
00:33:18.520 Alright
00:33:18.940 let's talk
00:33:20.600 about
00:33:20.800 Bloomberg.
00:33:21.620 Bloomberg of
00:33:22.220 course has
00:33:22.660 that stop
00:33:23.740 and frisk
00:33:24.160 problem,
00:33:24.800 the black
00:33:25.120 support
00:33:25.440 problem.
00:33:26.540 But worse
00:33:27.340 than that he's
00:33:27.980 a terrible
00:33:28.560 matchup for
00:33:29.320 Trump.
00:33:30.440 If you
00:33:31.060 were to
00:33:31.360 take a
00:33:31.820 blank piece
00:33:32.320 of paper
00:33:32.660 and say
00:33:33.000 to yourself
00:33:33.380 alright your
00:33:34.080 exercise is
00:33:35.680 to invent
00:33:36.280 a candidate
00:33:37.160 and make
00:33:39.100 the candidate
00:33:39.620 the worst
00:33:40.440 matchup you
00:33:41.300 could possibly
00:33:41.980 think of
00:33:42.640 for President
00:33:43.900 Trump.
00:33:44.420 What's the
00:33:45.040 worst thing
00:33:45.520 you could do?
00:33:46.020 It's like
00:33:46.220 well billionaire
00:33:47.460 and that's
00:33:48.980 pretty bad
00:33:49.500 but worse
00:33:51.780 billionaire
00:33:52.700 with foreign
00:33:53.740 entanglements
00:33:54.640 especially with
00:33:55.720 countries we're
00:33:56.460 worried the most
00:33:57.240 about hello
00:33:58.480 China.
00:34:00.420 Bloomberg's
00:34:00.940 got China
00:34:02.100 entanglements
00:34:02.740 he's probably
00:34:03.140 got all kinds
00:34:03.920 of entanglements
00:34:04.560 all over the
00:34:05.080 globe.
00:34:06.040 Do any of
00:34:06.480 those entanglements
00:34:07.460 mean that
00:34:08.100 something bad
00:34:08.860 has happened
00:34:09.580 could happen
00:34:10.140 would happen?
00:34:11.580 Who knows?
00:34:12.740 But it's not
00:34:13.560 a good matchup
00:34:14.320 because that's
00:34:14.900 one of the
00:34:15.400 things that
00:34:15.840 people were
00:34:16.240 afraid of
00:34:16.740 with Trump
00:34:17.180 is the
00:34:18.240 international
00:34:19.060 entanglements.
00:34:20.540 So are you
00:34:21.040 going to
00:34:21.560 oppose him
00:34:23.160 with the guy
00:34:23.680 who has the
00:34:24.120 most international
00:34:25.140 entanglements
00:34:25.820 we've ever seen?
00:34:26.560 I doubt
00:34:27.580 anybody has
00:34:28.200 more international
00:34:29.040 entanglements
00:34:29.820 than Bloomberg.
00:34:32.240 Here's one
00:34:33.060 you don't see
00:34:33.540 coming
00:34:33.860 or maybe
00:34:34.320 you do.
00:34:36.120 Has
00:34:36.180 Bloomberg
00:34:36.820 got any
00:34:37.840 Me Too
00:34:38.720 problems?
00:34:41.680 Does anybody
00:34:42.620 I don't see
00:34:43.880 it in the
00:34:44.240 headlines
00:34:44.740 maybe there
00:34:46.080 were some
00:34:46.460 stories that
00:34:47.160 were unconfirmed
00:34:47.980 floating around
00:34:48.760 but here's
00:34:49.820 the thing
00:34:50.180 he's
00:34:51.440 an old
00:34:52.800 white
00:34:53.140 billionaire
00:34:53.600 billionaire
00:34:53.760 of a certain
00:34:54.940 age?
00:34:56.040 Let me
00:34:56.640 ask you
00:34:57.020 this question.
00:34:58.420 If you're
00:34:58.860 an old
00:34:59.520 white
00:35:00.260 billionaire
00:35:00.780 of a
00:35:01.300 certain
00:35:01.520 age
00:35:01.920 don't you
00:35:03.640 have a
00:35:04.020 lot of
00:35:04.360 me too's
00:35:04.940 in your
00:35:05.340 portfolio?
00:35:07.760 Now maybe
00:35:08.300 they haven't
00:35:08.860 all come
00:35:09.300 out
00:35:09.700 but the
00:35:10.860 odds
00:35:11.280 of any
00:35:13.140 old
00:35:13.660 white
00:35:13.920 billionaire
00:35:14.280 and I'm
00:35:15.380 not even
00:35:15.700 going to
00:35:15.900 make this
00:35:16.240 personal
00:35:16.720 about
00:35:17.780 Bloomberg
00:35:18.180 because I
00:35:18.620 have no
00:35:19.560 information
00:35:20.160 that would
00:35:20.600 say there's
00:35:21.020 anything wrong
00:35:21.740 with him
00:35:22.120 or he's
00:35:22.380 bad.
00:35:22.940 In fact I
00:35:23.440 like him.
00:35:23.940 I think
00:35:24.160 Bloomberg's
00:35:24.700 a solid
00:35:25.060 guy.
00:35:27.160 Bloomberg's
00:35:27.720 a solid
00:35:28.080 guy and I
00:35:28.720 would say
00:35:29.000 he's a
00:35:29.540 solid
00:35:30.380 patriot.
00:35:31.500 I don't
00:35:31.760 like his
00:35:33.760 political
00:35:34.180 opinion at
00:35:34.760 the moment
00:35:35.120 but he's
00:35:35.800 a solid
00:35:36.300 smart
00:35:36.920 reasonable
00:35:37.680 right-minded
00:35:39.520 kind of
00:35:40.500 guy.
00:35:41.580 But you
00:35:42.040 know
00:35:42.400 there's just
00:35:43.800 nobody in
00:35:44.640 that demographic
00:35:45.360 who isn't
00:35:46.300 going to
00:35:46.540 get a
00:35:46.840 me-too
00:35:47.180 coming out
00:35:47.740 of the
00:35:47.940 woods
00:35:48.200 somewhere.
00:35:49.400 Somewhere.
00:35:50.620 Now the
00:35:50.940 other big
00:35:53.340 thing that's
00:35:54.120 different about
00:35:54.580 him and
00:35:54.920 Trump is
00:35:55.300 climate change
00:35:56.020 and he's
00:35:56.940 going for
00:35:57.360 this get
00:35:58.860 rid of
00:35:59.520 most carbon
00:36:00.700 fuels 80%
00:36:01.780 or something.
00:36:03.540 He doesn't
00:36:04.080 go far
00:36:05.240 enough probably
00:36:06.140 for the
00:36:07.580 Democrats who
00:36:08.220 think it's
00:36:08.640 the end of
00:36:09.020 the world
00:36:09.380 climate change
00:36:10.160 but I saw
00:36:11.500 a study
00:36:12.060 recently that
00:36:12.660 said that
00:36:13.300 climate change
00:36:14.000 for the
00:36:14.420 country
00:36:14.860 as a
00:36:15.560 whole
00:36:15.880 was one
00:36:17.320 of the
00:36:17.560 lowest
00:36:17.800 priorities.
00:36:19.760 Now I'm
00:36:20.160 not sure I
00:36:20.560 totally
00:36:21.080 believe the
00:36:22.460 polls on
00:36:23.000 that because
00:36:23.500 the way
00:36:23.760 people answer
00:36:24.720 questions of
00:36:26.040 what is a
00:36:26.500 priority
00:36:26.940 can be
00:36:28.840 you know
00:36:30.660 I'm not
00:36:31.180 sure that
00:36:31.500 those are
00:36:31.920 really
00:36:32.440 credible
00:36:34.060 polls but
00:36:35.580 the poll I
00:36:36.160 saw showed
00:36:36.920 climate change
00:36:37.920 almost last
00:36:38.860 and economics
00:36:39.900 and immigration
00:36:40.740 toward the
00:36:41.320 top.
00:36:42.440 So that's
00:36:44.060 a problem.
00:36:44.860 Bloomberg
00:36:46.200 I'm sure
00:36:47.180 is not
00:36:47.680 going to
00:36:48.020 be as
00:36:48.360 pro-immigration
00:36:49.260 as his
00:36:49.840 own team
00:36:50.360 wants.
00:36:51.120 I just
00:36:51.500 don't think
00:36:51.880 he has
00:36:52.180 enough red
00:36:52.760 meat for
00:36:53.200 his own
00:36:53.580 team.
00:36:55.080 He's sort
00:36:55.780 of in that
00:36:56.200 weird
00:36:56.640 uninteresting
00:36:57.580 ground in
00:36:58.220 the middle.
00:36:59.260 He doesn't
00:36:59.760 have enough
00:37:00.260 for Democrats.
00:37:01.620 He's not
00:37:02.120 enough like
00:37:02.680 Trump to be
00:37:03.200 a Republican.
00:37:04.700 He's sort
00:37:05.280 of in that
00:37:05.800 dead man's
00:37:06.920 you know
00:37:07.700 in tennis
00:37:08.160 there's a
00:37:08.780 part of the
00:37:10.200 court that's
00:37:10.820 the dead
00:37:11.520 man's
00:37:11.880 zone that
00:37:12.960 if you
00:37:13.520 move into
00:37:14.060 that part
00:37:14.520 of the
00:37:14.720 tennis
00:37:14.960 court somebody's
00:37:16.000 going to win
00:37:16.340 the point
00:37:16.800 because it's
00:37:17.320 not a good
00:37:17.760 place to be.
00:37:18.500 It's too
00:37:18.720 close to the
00:37:19.220 net but
00:37:19.880 not close
00:37:20.400 enough.
00:37:22.360 I think
00:37:22.960 Bloomberg's
00:37:23.460 there.
00:37:23.840 He's in
00:37:24.100 that weird
00:37:24.820 area where
00:37:26.560 he's not
00:37:26.960 going to
00:37:27.180 excite
00:37:27.460 anybody.
00:37:29.040 So he's
00:37:31.100 also boring
00:37:31.760 and short
00:37:32.340 compared to
00:37:33.120 Trump.
00:37:33.540 We would
00:37:34.000 like to
00:37:34.340 think this
00:37:34.700 short doesn't
00:37:35.300 make a
00:37:35.620 difference.
00:37:36.500 Now Bloomberg's
00:37:37.200 roughly the
00:37:38.300 same size as
00:37:38.920 me.
00:37:40.180 Now do I
00:37:40.740 think I
00:37:41.140 could not
00:37:41.600 be president
00:37:42.160 because of
00:37:42.760 my height?
00:37:43.700 No I
00:37:44.180 could be
00:37:44.460 president.
00:37:45.520 If I
00:37:46.040 wanted to
00:37:46.580 I'm pretty
00:37:47.440 sure I
00:37:47.700 could do
00:37:47.960 it.
00:37:49.700 I did
00:37:50.240 write
00:37:50.440 Winn
00:37:50.660 Bigley.
00:37:52.500 Now I'm
00:37:52.980 not going
00:37:53.280 to do
00:37:53.500 it.
00:37:53.680 I have no
00:37:53.980 interest in
00:37:54.420 that kind
00:37:54.780 of work.
00:37:55.680 But I
00:37:56.520 don't think
00:37:56.860 my height
00:37:57.260 would stop
00:37:57.680 me.
00:37:58.680 So I
00:37:59.080 don't think
00:37:59.340 his height
00:37:59.640 is going
00:37:59.920 to stop
00:38:00.320 him.
00:38:00.560 But it's
00:38:00.840 a negative
00:38:01.200 if you
00:38:01.700 stand again
00:38:02.240 on this
00:38:03.100 screen.
00:38:03.880 People are
00:38:04.360 in their
00:38:05.480 non-critical
00:38:08.460 part of
00:38:08.840 their
00:38:08.960 brain
00:38:09.240 are just
00:38:09.640 going to
00:38:09.860 say
00:38:10.040 leader.
00:38:11.840 I want
00:38:12.540 a leader
00:38:12.880 who looks
00:38:13.260 like a
00:38:13.560 leader.
00:38:14.640 I'll take
00:38:15.300 the big
00:38:15.600 one.
00:38:16.020 Thank you.
00:38:17.020 So it
00:38:17.660 does make
00:38:18.080 a difference.
00:38:19.380 Maybe not
00:38:20.000 the commanding
00:38:20.840 difference.
00:38:21.720 The other
00:38:22.000 problem is
00:38:22.400 he's boring.
00:38:24.180 He's
00:38:24.620 boring.
00:38:26.820 He's
00:38:27.300 boring.
00:38:28.200 How do
00:38:28.780 you take
00:38:29.080 the most
00:38:29.460 boring
00:38:29.840 candidate
00:38:30.260 and put
00:38:31.440 him up
00:38:31.700 against
00:38:32.000 Trump?
00:38:32.380 The most
00:38:33.020 interesting
00:38:33.500 human being
00:38:34.260 we've ever
00:38:34.800 known in
00:38:36.180 the history
00:38:36.620 of civilization.
00:38:37.420 that's
00:38:38.400 like the
00:38:38.740 worst.
00:38:42.000 And also
00:38:42.740 there's a
00:38:43.120 question about
00:38:43.560 his age
00:38:44.020 whether he's
00:38:44.420 losing a
00:38:44.880 step.
00:38:45.580 That will
00:38:45.960 always be
00:38:46.320 a question.
00:38:47.700 And you
00:38:48.320 remember he
00:38:48.780 was talking
00:38:49.160 about how
00:38:49.600 he would
00:38:50.040 if he
00:38:50.740 became
00:38:51.000 president
00:38:51.440 he would
00:38:52.200 work from
00:38:52.660 a cubicle
00:38:53.200 basically
00:38:53.900 or an
00:38:55.480 open office
00:38:56.060 instead of
00:38:56.560 having private
00:38:57.700 offices.
00:38:58.760 That's the
00:38:59.420 worst instinct.
00:39:01.360 It sounds
00:39:01.960 like
00:39:02.800 you know
00:39:04.160 when
00:39:04.380 Bloomberg
00:39:05.120 did his
00:39:05.680 little
00:39:05.940 I'm going
00:39:06.260 to work
00:39:06.520 in a
00:39:06.760 cubicle
00:39:07.120 when
00:39:07.400 I'm
00:39:07.600 mayor
00:39:07.880 I
00:39:08.740 thought
00:39:08.940 to
00:39:09.060 myself
00:39:09.400 that's
00:39:09.840 not
00:39:10.000 bad
00:39:10.280 that's
00:39:10.800 not
00:39:10.940 bad
00:39:11.180 if
00:39:11.720 you're
00:39:11.920 a
00:39:12.140 mayor
00:39:12.480 you're
00:39:13.720 more
00:39:13.940 like
00:39:14.260 a
00:39:14.660 senior
00:39:15.320 vice
00:39:15.640 president
00:39:16.080 at
00:39:16.760 a
00:39:16.900 big
00:39:17.060 company
00:39:17.440 might
00:39:20.640 want
00:39:20.900 to
00:39:21.120 not
00:39:21.900 have
00:39:22.120 a
00:39:22.240 big
00:39:22.500 office
00:39:22.980 and
00:39:23.360 look
00:39:23.640 like
00:39:23.860 they're
00:39:24.040 special
00:39:24.440 might
00:39:25.060 want
00:39:25.240 to
00:39:25.300 have
00:39:25.420 a
00:39:25.540 cubicle
00:39:25.920 and
00:39:26.240 be
00:39:26.380 a
00:39:26.500 person
00:39:26.780 of
00:39:26.900 the
00:39:27.000 people
00:39:27.240 I
00:39:27.460 can
00:39:27.620 see
00:39:27.800 it
00:39:27.980 I
00:39:28.460 don't
00:39:28.580 think
00:39:28.740 it
00:39:28.820 was
00:39:28.940 important
00:39:29.360 you know
00:39:30.220 I
00:39:30.300 don't
00:39:30.400 think
00:39:36.520 but
00:39:38.280 as
00:39:38.440 soon
00:39:38.620 as
00:39:38.780 you
00:39:38.900 say
00:39:39.180 you're
00:39:39.640 going
00:39:39.740 to
00:39:39.780 be
00:39:39.900 the
00:39:40.080 brand
00:39:40.480 of
00:39:40.680 our
00:39:40.820 country
00:39:41.160 you're
00:39:41.440 going
00:39:41.540 to
00:39:41.620 be
00:39:41.820 the
00:39:42.660 person
00:39:43.000 we
00:39:43.260 think
00:39:43.560 of
00:39:43.820 when
00:39:44.000 we
00:39:44.160 think
00:39:44.380 of
00:39:44.480 the
00:39:44.580 United
00:39:44.840 States
00:39:45.280 you
00:39:46.100 don't
00:39:46.320 want
00:39:46.520 them
00:39:46.620 in
00:39:46.720 a
00:39:46.840 cubicle
00:39:47.260 you
00:39:48.320 want
00:39:48.640 them
00:39:48.760 in
00:39:48.860 the
00:39:48.980 oval
00:39:49.240 office
00:39:49.760 every
00:39:50.340 time
00:39:50.760 because
00:39:51.580 that
00:39:51.860 office
00:39:52.240 is
00:39:52.460 who
00:39:52.620 we
00:39:52.860 are
00:39:53.040 that's
00:39:53.280 our
00:39:53.440 brand
00:39:53.820 you
00:39:54.540 know
00:39:54.640 it'd
00:39:54.820 be
00:39:54.920 great
00:39:55.160 if
00:39:55.360 you
00:39:55.460 take
00:39:55.660 your
00:39:55.820 own
00:39:56.180 brand
00:39:56.620 Mike
00:39:57.480 Bloomberg
00:39:57.780 if
00:39:58.080 you
00:40:06.520 own
00:40:06.920 brand
00:40:07.320 but
00:40:08.200 if
00:40:08.340 you
00:40:08.440 become
00:40:08.740 president
00:40:09.200 you're
00:40:10.240 my
00:40:10.460 brand
00:40:10.860 you're
00:40:12.200 my
00:40:12.440 brand
00:40:12.860 as
00:40:13.500 president
00:40:13.860 what
00:40:14.260 you
00:40:14.500 do
00:40:14.760 reflects
00:40:15.240 on
00:40:15.460 me
00:40:15.740 if
00:40:16.480 you're
00:40:16.680 a
00:40:16.800 mayor
00:40:17.060 does
00:40:17.960 what
00:40:18.160 the
00:40:18.340 mayor
00:40:18.660 does
00:40:19.060 reflect
00:40:19.640 on
00:40:19.920 the
00:40:20.300 people
00:40:20.580 in
00:40:20.760 the
00:40:20.900 city
00:40:21.120 not
00:40:21.700 really
00:40:22.000 right
00:40:22.260 have
00:40:23.320 you
00:40:23.460 ever
00:40:23.680 bonded
00:40:24.220 have
00:40:24.920 you
00:40:25.020 ever
00:40:25.160 thought
00:40:25.520 of
00:40:25.660 yourself
00:40:26.100 as
00:40:26.960 being
00:40:27.140 part
00:40:27.360 of
00:40:27.460 the
00:40:27.580 brand
00:40:28.060 of
00:40:28.520 your
00:40:28.680 mayor
00:40:29.180 no
00:40:30.180 not
00:40:30.420 once
00:40:30.860 but
00:40:31.940 when
00:40:32.080 you
00:40:32.180 think
00:40:32.360 a
00:40:32.480 president
00:40:32.840 that's
00:40:33.340 an
00:40:33.440 accessory
00:40:33.860 to
00:40:34.180 you
00:40:34.420 you
00:40:36.080 you
00:40:37.000 American
00:40:37.540 citizens
00:40:38.060 a lot
00:40:38.440 of
00:40:38.540 people
00:40:38.720 from
00:40:38.940 other
00:40:39.140 countries
00:40:39.460 watching
00:40:39.820 this
00:40:40.020 but
00:40:40.440 if
00:40:40.560 you're
00:40:40.680 American
00:40:41.040 your
00:40:42.360 president
00:40:42.820 is part
00:40:43.360 of
00:40:43.440 your
00:40:43.560 brand
00:40:43.960 whether
00:40:44.180 you
00:40:44.320 like
00:40:44.560 it
00:40:44.680 or
00:40:44.780 not
00:40:45.080 and
00:40:45.860 and
00:40:46.040 that's
00:40:46.560 just
00:40:46.780 sort
00:40:47.480 of
00:40:47.580 a
00:40:47.740 dumb
00:40:48.220 old
00:40:48.680 person
00:40:49.120 move
00:40:49.660 to
00:40:50.720 not
00:40:51.000 correct
00:40:51.580 from
00:40:51.920 the
00:40:52.080 fact
00:40:52.300 that
00:40:52.480 what
00:40:52.660 he
00:40:52.780 did
00:40:52.960 as
00:40:53.140 a
00:40:53.260 mayor
00:40:53.520 just
00:40:54.320 doesn't
00:40:54.680 make
00:40:54.880 sense
00:40:55.340 as
00:40:56.060 president
00:40:56.480 it
00:40:56.780 just
00:40:56.920 doesn't
00:40:57.160 make
00:40:57.340 sense
00:40:57.700 and
00:40:58.200 it
00:40:58.320 feels
00:40:58.560 like
00:40:58.840 an
00:40:59.300 old
00:40:59.600 guy
00:40:59.960 who
00:41:04.180 popular
00:41:04.540 but
00:41:05.260 he
00:41:05.380 can't
00:41:05.620 write
00:41:05.780 a
00:41:05.880 hit
00:41:06.020 song
00:41:06.320 anymore
00:41:06.700 so
00:41:07.620 he's
00:41:08.020 just
00:41:08.360 going
00:41:08.560 to
00:41:08.580 play
00:41:08.740 the
00:41:08.920 oldies
00:41:09.320 I
00:41:09.620 just
00:41:09.780 don't
00:41:09.960 think
00:41:10.140 that
00:41:10.300 matches
00:41:10.580 up
00:41:10.820 against
00:41:11.080 Trump
00:41:11.380 I
00:41:13.940 also
00:41:14.160 think
00:41:14.440 Trump
00:41:14.720 has
00:41:15.120 another
00:41:16.460 advantage
00:41:17.140 which
00:41:18.620 is
00:41:18.940 that
00:41:19.640 he's
00:41:20.240 going
00:41:20.360 to
00:41:20.420 be
00:41:20.560 more
00:41:20.900 immune
00:41:21.500 from
00:41:22.180 fake
00:41:22.540 news
00:41:22.920 than
00:41:23.140 ever
00:41:23.360 before
00:41:23.800 if
00:41:25.340 because
00:41:25.860 we've
00:41:26.220 watched
00:41:26.660 the
00:41:27.700 fake
00:41:28.020 news
00:41:28.460 brand
00:41:29.520 Trump
00:41:29.960 as
00:41:30.140 a
00:41:30.300 certain
00:41:30.480 thing
00:41:30.780 and
00:41:30.940 then
00:41:31.080 be
00:41:31.280 wrong
00:41:31.680 time
00:41:32.260 after
00:41:32.540 time
00:41:32.800 after
00:41:33.020 time
00:41:33.380 you
00:41:33.600 from
00:41:34.180 Russia
00:41:34.800 collusion
00:41:35.340 you
00:41:36.060 name
00:41:36.580 it
00:41:36.720 you
00:41:36.880 know
00:41:36.980 what
00:41:37.080 I'm
00:41:37.180 talking
00:41:37.380 about
00:41:37.640 I
00:41:39.280 don't
00:41:39.500 know
00:41:39.720 if
00:41:39.960 the
00:41:40.620 attacks
00:41:41.000 on
00:41:41.220 Trump
00:41:41.460 will
00:41:41.640 have
00:41:41.780 the
00:41:41.940 same
00:41:42.160 power
00:41:42.680 they
00:41:43.740 might
00:41:44.000 have
00:41:44.360 before
00:41:44.700 we
00:41:44.920 saw
00:41:45.120 him
00:41:45.260 in
00:41:45.400 office
00:41:45.900 for
00:41:46.120 four
00:41:46.360 years
00:41:46.740 I
00:41:47.480 think
00:41:47.740 he's
00:41:49.380 just
00:41:49.700 more
00:41:50.100 immune
00:41:50.420 from
00:41:50.740 every
00:41:51.120 kind
00:41:51.400 of
00:41:51.520 attack
00:41:51.980 I
00:41:52.420 can't
00:41:52.620 even
00:41:52.760 imagine
00:41:53.160 what
00:41:54.080 kind
00:41:54.380 of
00:41:54.500 attack
00:41:54.800 he
00:41:55.000 hasn't
00:41:55.280 already
00:41:55.560 gone
00:41:55.860 through
00:41:56.260 and
00:41:57.000 it
00:41:57.120 didn't
00:41:57.340 take
00:41:57.560 him
00:41:57.680 out
00:41:57.820 last
00:41:58.080 time
00:41:58.340 so
00:41:59.180 he's
00:41:59.480 sort
00:41:59.820 of
00:42:00.020 more
00:42:00.720 Teflon
00:42:01.400 than
00:42:02.340 he
00:42:02.500 ever
00:42:02.760 was
00:42:03.180 and
00:42:03.400 he
00:42:03.540 was
00:42:03.720 pretty
00:42:04.020 Teflon
00:42:04.620 I
00:42:05.400 mean
00:42:05.720 grab him
00:42:06.380 by the
00:42:06.740 you know
00:42:07.100 what
00:42:07.420 and he
00:42:08.140 still
00:42:08.360 got
00:42:08.540 elected
00:42:08.880 that's
00:42:09.880 pretty
00:42:10.180 Teflon
00:42:10.760 so
00:42:11.580 he's
00:42:11.780 more
00:42:11.980 Teflon
00:42:12.420 than
00:42:12.560 ever
00:42:12.780 but
00:42:13.620 if
00:42:14.420 it's
00:42:14.600 somebody
00:42:14.840 like
00:42:15.160 Bernie
00:42:15.560 Bernie
00:42:16.340 has
00:42:16.620 a
00:42:16.860 real
00:42:17.400 problem
00:42:18.120 running
00:42:19.140 against
00:42:19.540 Trump
00:42:20.020 Bernie
00:42:21.660 has
00:42:21.940 a
00:42:22.100 real
00:42:22.320 problem
00:42:22.800 you
00:42:23.420 know
00:42:23.520 what
00:42:23.680 Bernie's
00:42:24.080 big
00:42:24.480 problem
00:42:24.880 is
00:42:25.220 he's
00:42:26.880 not
00:42:27.200 a
00:42:27.480 good
00:42:27.740 enough
00:42:28.020 liar
00:42:28.600 now
00:42:30.980 I
00:42:31.700 believe
00:42:32.040 that
00:42:32.220 Bernie
00:42:32.420 says
00:42:32.740 some
00:42:32.960 things
00:42:33.260 that
00:42:33.540 stretch
00:42:34.700 credulity
00:42:35.640 he
00:42:36.000 certainly
00:42:36.380 said
00:42:36.740 things
00:42:37.140 that
00:42:37.380 the
00:42:37.620 fact
00:42:37.880 checkers
00:42:38.380 checked
00:42:39.420 him
00:42:39.620 on
00:42:39.900 and
00:42:40.080 said
00:42:40.240 not
00:42:40.740 so
00:42:40.940 much
00:42:41.200 so
00:42:41.920 probably
00:42:42.620 there
00:42:42.980 are
00:42:43.100 no
00:42:43.300 politicians
00:42:43.800 who
00:42:44.140 don't
00:42:44.420 violate
00:42:44.920 the
00:42:45.120 fact
00:42:45.360 checking
00:42:45.720 sometimes
00:42:47.080 but
00:42:48.180 Bernie
00:42:48.520 is
00:42:48.760 kind
00:42:49.060 of
00:42:49.220 unique
00:42:49.800 and
00:42:50.640 that
00:42:50.800 he's
00:42:51.040 not
00:42:51.280 the
00:42:51.460 one
00:42:51.660 to
00:42:51.820 go
00:42:52.000 negative
00:42:52.400 as
00:42:52.980 much
00:42:53.340 and
00:42:53.600 he's
00:42:53.760 not
00:42:53.980 going
00:42:54.140 to
00:42:54.260 lie
00:42:54.560 as
00:42:54.760 much
00:42:55.080 so
00:42:56.140 he's
00:42:56.480 the
00:42:56.600 kind
00:42:56.800 of
00:42:56.920 person
00:42:57.180 if
00:42:57.360 you
00:42:57.460 said
00:42:57.640 hey
00:42:57.800 Bernie
00:42:58.080 I
00:42:59.000 don't
00:42:59.200 know
00:42:59.320 if
00:42:59.420 he's
00:42:59.580 ever
00:42:59.740 mentioned
00:43:00.040 this
00:43:00.260 he
00:43:00.360 probably
00:43:00.620 has
00:43:00.820 but
00:43:01.340 you
00:43:01.440 know
00:43:01.580 that
00:43:01.820 thing
00:43:02.660 in
00:43:02.840 Charlottesville
00:43:03.400 you got
00:43:03.800 that wrong
00:43:04.280 it turns
00:43:04.700 out
00:43:04.960 that
00:43:06.080 that
00:43:06.460 that's
00:43:07.000 a
00:43:07.120 misquote
00:43:07.560 the
00:43:07.860 president
00:43:08.180 never
00:43:08.580 said
00:43:09.800 that
00:43:10.100 the
00:43:10.300 neo-Nazis
00:43:10.880 were fine
00:43:11.300 people
00:43:11.600 he was
00:43:11.860 talking
00:43:12.080 about
00:43:12.280 the
00:43:12.400 other
00:43:12.560 people
00:43:12.840 there
00:43:13.120 that
00:43:14.420 he
00:43:14.540 said
00:43:14.760 were
00:43:14.980 not
00:43:16.080 the
00:43:16.320 races
00:43:16.660 if
00:43:17.780 you
00:43:17.920 tell
00:43:18.140 Biden
00:43:18.640 that
00:43:19.020 maybe
00:43:20.940 he'll
00:43:21.160 still
00:43:21.380 use
00:43:21.660 that
00:43:21.820 anyway
00:43:22.100 because
00:43:22.420 it
00:43:22.560 works
00:43:22.920 right
00:43:23.880 but
00:43:24.580 if
00:43:24.700 you
00:43:24.820 tell
00:43:25.020 Bernie
00:43:25.380 that
00:43:25.800 and
00:43:26.600 he
00:43:26.740 believes
00:43:27.080 oh
00:43:27.440 oh
00:43:27.900 geez
00:43:28.300 that's
00:43:28.700 not
00:43:28.860 even
00:43:29.020 true
00:43:29.340 and
00:43:29.900 it's
00:43:30.100 easy
00:43:30.360 to
00:43:30.560 prove
00:43:30.720 it's
00:43:30.880 not
00:43:31.060 true
00:43:31.320 you
00:43:31.880 just
00:43:32.040 look
00:43:32.220 at
00:43:32.320 the
00:43:32.420 transcript
00:43:32.820 I
00:43:33.840 don't
00:43:34.000 know
00:43:34.140 if
00:43:34.260 Bernie
00:43:34.480 would
00:43:34.680 use
00:43:34.900 it
00:43:35.160 maybe
00:43:36.520 he
00:43:36.700 would
00:43:36.920 maybe
00:43:38.320 he
00:43:38.500 would
00:43:38.680 but
00:43:39.520 I
00:43:39.620 think
00:43:39.800 Bernie
00:43:40.120 is
00:43:40.680 handicapped
00:43:41.760 by being
00:43:42.540 a little
00:43:42.940 too
00:43:43.180 honest
00:43:43.580 and
00:43:43.940 I
00:43:44.060 don't
00:43:44.200 know
00:43:44.340 if
00:43:44.460 that
00:43:44.560 would
00:43:44.700 work
00:43:44.940 in
00:43:45.060 a
00:43:45.180 general
00:43:45.420 election
00:43:45.860 you
00:43:46.180 know
00:43:46.300 what
00:43:46.360 I
00:43:46.460 mean
00:43:46.600 all
00:43:48.160 right
00:43:48.340 there's
00:43:51.800 one
00:43:52.160 suggestion
00:43:52.720 I
00:43:53.720 just
00:43:53.960 heard
00:43:54.300 this
00:43:54.500 from
00:43:54.720 an
00:43:54.960 opinion
00:43:55.240 person
00:43:55.640 that
00:43:56.800 one
00:43:57.080 of
00:43:57.180 the
00:43:57.300 reasons
00:43:57.620 that
00:43:58.140 Bernie
00:43:58.740 lost
00:43:59.120 some
00:43:59.320 support
00:43:59.780 allegedly
00:44:00.800 this
00:44:01.520 is
00:44:01.700 unconfirmed
00:44:02.400 but
00:44:02.940 recently
00:44:03.360 with
00:44:03.740 the
00:44:03.920 African
00:44:04.200 American
00:44:04.520 population
00:44:05.200 is
00:44:06.120 that
00:44:06.300 Joe
00:44:06.520 Rogan
00:44:07.500 said
00:44:09.480 he
00:44:09.600 might
00:44:09.780 vote
00:44:10.000 for
00:44:10.220 him
00:44:10.420 now
00:44:11.420 does
00:44:11.980 that
00:44:12.180 feel
00:44:12.440 right
00:44:12.700 to
00:44:12.860 you
00:44:13.080 do
00:44:13.840 you
00:44:13.960 think
00:44:14.180 that
00:44:14.420 his
00:44:14.740 African
00:44:15.280 American
00:44:15.680 support
00:44:16.180 would
00:44:16.520 plummet
00:44:17.040 because
00:44:17.860 Joe
00:44:18.180 Rogan
00:44:18.520 said
00:44:18.740 he
00:44:18.840 might
00:44:19.040 vote
00:44:19.340 for
00:44:19.640 Bernie
00:44:20.120 Sanders
00:44:20.500 I
00:44:20.940 don't
00:44:21.100 think
00:44:21.480 so
00:44:21.780 I
00:44:22.420 don't
00:44:22.540 think
00:44:22.700 people
00:44:22.960 are
00:44:23.100 paying
00:44:23.320 attention
00:44:23.680 at
00:44:23.920 that
00:44:24.180 level
00:44:24.480 because
00:44:25.420 what
00:44:25.900 the
00:44:26.060 heck
00:44:26.300 do
00:44:26.580 the
00:44:26.780 black
00:44:27.060 community
00:44:27.500 have
00:44:27.840 what
00:44:28.260 problem
00:44:28.620 do
00:44:28.800 they
00:44:28.920 have
00:44:29.100 with
00:44:29.240 Joe
00:44:29.400 Rogan
00:44:29.740 so
00:44:30.580 it
00:44:30.720 turns
00:44:30.920 out
00:44:31.240 he's
00:44:32.400 comedian
00:44:33.040 and
00:44:33.380 provocative
00:44:33.860 and he's
00:44:34.360 been around
00:44:34.740 for a long
00:44:35.200 time
00:44:35.540 so you can
00:44:36.040 dig
00:44:36.240 through his
00:44:36.660 past
00:44:36.980 and you
00:44:37.240 can find
00:44:37.640 something
00:44:37.980 to be
00:44:38.300 offended
00:44:38.600 by
00:44:38.880 but I
00:44:40.460 don't
00:44:40.560 think most
00:44:40.940 of you are
00:44:41.260 aware of it
00:44:41.800 and it's
00:44:42.160 not real
00:44:42.680 it's just
00:44:43.640 being provocative
00:44:44.660 and being
00:44:45.700 offensive
00:44:46.100 is a lot
00:44:47.440 different
00:44:47.860 from being
00:44:48.960 racist
00:44:49.480 he's not
00:44:50.040 racist
00:44:50.400 or even
00:44:50.880 close
00:44:51.320 at least
00:44:52.500 there's
00:44:52.880 certainly no
00:44:53.480 evidence of it
00:44:54.160 and there's
00:44:54.440 lots of
00:44:54.800 evidence against
00:44:55.420 it
00:44:55.720 so
00:44:56.580 Joe Rogan
00:44:58.640 got a lot
00:44:59.120 of heat
00:44:59.380 from that
00:44:59.820 and he
00:45:00.500 clarified
00:45:00.960 his
00:45:01.500 opinion
00:45:02.280 which I
00:45:02.740 hadn't heard
00:45:03.080 before
00:45:03.400 and it
00:45:03.740 goes like
00:45:04.120 this
00:45:04.400 so this
00:45:05.740 is Joe
00:45:06.120 Rogan
00:45:06.440 clarifying
00:45:07.000 his opinion
00:45:07.420 about
00:45:07.740 Sanders
00:45:08.560 and he
00:45:09.920 said on
00:45:10.260 his
00:45:10.400 podcast
00:45:11.760 all I
00:45:13.200 said is
00:45:13.640 I'm
00:45:13.880 probably
00:45:14.180 going to
00:45:14.500 vote for
00:45:14.820 him
00:45:15.000 but he
00:45:16.160 added
00:45:16.460 I like
00:45:17.300 I like
00:45:17.940 Tulsi
00:45:18.280 Gavard
00:45:18.720 I love
00:45:19.560 I love
00:45:20.000 her
00:45:20.180 I love
00:45:20.580 him
00:45:20.820 I love
00:45:21.320 Andrew
00:45:21.660 Yang
00:45:21.960 so he
00:45:23.000 was making
00:45:23.360 the point
00:45:23.780 that he's
00:45:24.320 you know
00:45:24.820 it's not
00:45:25.200 about one
00:45:25.760 candidate
00:45:26.160 there are
00:45:26.940 several
00:45:27.240 candidates
00:45:27.800 that he
00:45:28.200 likes
00:45:28.620 and then
00:45:29.880 he goes
00:45:30.460 and this
00:45:31.500 is why
00:45:32.180 Joe Rogan
00:45:33.680 is a
00:45:33.960 national
00:45:34.320 treasure
00:45:34.740 because the
00:45:35.880 next thing
00:45:36.280 he says
00:45:36.800 not many
00:45:38.020 people could
00:45:38.540 say
00:45:38.860 I mean
00:45:39.940 he just
00:45:40.280 he can go
00:45:40.920 where other
00:45:41.400 people can't
00:45:41.980 go
00:45:42.200 and this
00:45:42.840 is what
00:45:43.120 Joe Rogan
00:45:43.640 says
00:45:43.960 he goes
00:45:44.340 quote
00:45:44.680 here's the
00:45:45.820 really important
00:45:46.480 point
00:45:46.920 I'm an
00:45:48.120 effing
00:45:48.460 moron
00:45:48.940 he used
00:45:49.400 the real
00:45:49.760 word
00:45:50.000 I'm an
00:45:50.460 effing
00:45:50.720 moron
00:45:51.500 Joe Rogan
00:45:52.220 added
00:45:52.540 and went
00:45:53.480 on to
00:45:53.800 say
00:45:54.000 I don't
00:45:55.560 know
00:45:55.720 what's
00:45:56.000 required
00:45:56.400 to be
00:45:56.740 president
00:45:57.140 and that
00:45:57.860 maybe
00:45:58.320 we're
00:45:58.640 better
00:45:58.880 off
00:45:59.100 with
00:45:59.260 Trump
00:45:59.540 maybe
00:46:00.440 we're
00:46:00.720 better
00:46:00.900 off
00:46:01.120 with
00:46:01.260 someone
00:46:01.460 else
00:46:01.740 I
00:46:02.280 don't
00:46:02.480 know
00:46:02.760 so
00:46:06.000 Rogan
00:46:06.740 of course
00:46:07.620 famously
00:46:08.240 has had
00:46:08.660 experiences
00:46:09.300 with
00:46:09.860 hallucinogenics
00:46:10.880 and
00:46:11.720 I've always
00:46:12.820 told you
00:46:13.200 that that
00:46:13.600 allows you
00:46:14.120 to
00:46:15.000 see the
00:46:16.160 world
00:46:16.460 through
00:46:16.840 different
00:46:17.240 filters
00:46:17.780 if you
00:46:19.320 have
00:46:19.580 experience
00:46:20.440 with
00:46:21.060 altered
00:46:21.960 consciousness
00:46:22.540 you know
00:46:23.640 that you
00:46:24.080 can experience
00:46:24.820 a world
00:46:25.180 that works
00:46:25.700 perfectly
00:46:26.180 you can
00:46:26.740 eat
00:46:27.140 and procreate
00:46:27.960 and go
00:46:28.240 to work
00:46:28.620 but it
00:46:29.120 all just
00:46:29.420 looks
00:46:29.660 different
00:46:30.000 if you've
00:46:31.580 never
00:46:31.760 experienced
00:46:32.260 that
00:46:32.580 you think
00:46:33.140 that your
00:46:33.460 point of
00:46:33.860 view
00:46:34.080 might be
00:46:34.920 magic
00:46:35.360 it's like
00:46:36.180 ah
00:46:36.520 how did
00:46:37.500 I get
00:46:37.780 the right
00:46:38.140 point of
00:46:38.520 view
00:46:38.700 when there
00:46:39.140 are
00:46:39.560 7 billion
00:46:40.220 people
00:46:40.540 in the
00:46:40.720 world
00:46:40.880 who got
00:46:41.220 it
00:46:41.340 wrong
00:46:41.640 I'm
00:46:42.360 magic
00:46:42.780 my brain
00:46:43.780 can see
00:46:44.200 things
00:46:44.540 that other
00:46:44.840 people
00:46:45.080 can't
00:46:45.480 I'm
00:46:46.080 the only
00:46:46.420 one
00:46:46.700 with a
00:46:47.060 clear
00:46:47.460 view
00:46:47.760 of the
00:46:48.000 world
00:46:48.340 that's
00:46:49.640 kind
00:46:49.940 of a
00:46:50.200 low
00:46:50.420 level
00:46:50.740 of
00:46:50.940 consciousness
00:46:51.420 the
00:46:52.480 highest
00:46:52.920 level
00:46:53.260 of
00:46:53.460 consciousness
00:46:54.000 is
00:46:55.180 expressed
00:46:55.680 in this
00:46:56.160 statement
00:46:56.580 you ready
00:46:57.520 here's a
00:46:58.520 sentence
00:46:58.860 from one
00:47:00.320 of the
00:47:00.560 highest
00:47:01.000 consciousness
00:47:02.000 people
00:47:02.500 the people
00:47:02.860 who can
00:47:03.120 really
00:47:03.420 see the
00:47:03.860 field
00:47:04.080 clearly
00:47:04.600 Joe
00:47:05.460 Rogan
00:47:05.880 I'm
00:47:06.980 an
00:47:07.120 effing
00:47:07.480 moron
00:47:07.960 I don't
00:47:09.740 know what's
00:47:10.220 required to
00:47:10.880 be president
00:47:11.420 and that
00:47:12.300 maybe we're
00:47:12.880 better off
00:47:13.340 with Trump
00:47:13.760 maybe we're
00:47:14.280 better off
00:47:14.620 with someone
00:47:14.960 else
00:47:15.240 I don't
00:47:15.800 know
00:47:16.100 that
00:47:17.240 statement
00:47:17.760 that he
00:47:19.240 doesn't
00:47:19.640 know
00:47:20.000 who would
00:47:22.320 be the
00:47:22.540 best
00:47:22.740 president
00:47:23.140 or the
00:47:23.620 complexity
00:47:24.100 of the
00:47:24.940 policies
00:47:25.380 etc.
00:47:26.840 is the
00:47:27.560 highest
00:47:27.940 level
00:47:28.400 of
00:47:28.740 awareness
00:47:29.240 the
00:47:31.020 level below
00:47:31.860 that is
00:47:32.400 oh I
00:47:32.780 know
00:47:33.060 oh yeah
00:47:33.860 I know
00:47:34.280 this one's
00:47:35.300 the good
00:47:35.560 one
00:47:35.780 and I
00:47:36.680 can tell
00:47:37.020 you what
00:47:37.260 the future
00:47:37.700 looks like
00:47:38.320 you could
00:47:40.780 be right
00:47:41.280 you could
00:47:42.860 be wrong
00:47:43.360 but the
00:47:44.540 higher
00:47:44.860 level
00:47:45.220 of
00:47:45.400 awareness
00:47:45.780 is
00:47:46.180 we're
00:47:47.220 just
00:47:47.520 not
00:47:47.860 that
00:47:48.160 smart
00:47:48.600 we
00:47:49.340 really
00:47:49.700 don't
00:47:50.180 know
00:47:50.380 what's
00:47:50.640 going
00:47:50.780 to
00:47:50.840 happen
00:47:51.100 so
00:47:52.880 I'm
00:47:55.240 happy
00:47:55.560 that
00:47:56.000 Joe
00:47:57.140 Rogan
00:47:57.500 added
00:47:57.800 some
00:47:58.100 context
00:47:58.680 to that
00:47:59.160 without
00:47:59.460 changing
00:47:59.940 his
00:48:00.240 opinion
00:48:00.540 because
00:48:01.200 he
00:48:01.300 didn't
00:48:01.540 say
00:48:01.860 therefore
00:48:02.620 I'm
00:48:02.940 not
00:48:03.200 going
00:48:03.320 to
00:48:03.420 vote
00:48:03.560 for
00:48:03.740 Bernie
00:48:03.960 he
00:48:04.220 stayed
00:48:04.720 with
00:48:04.940 that
00:48:05.160 but
00:48:05.700 then
00:48:05.840 he
00:48:05.940 gave
00:48:06.140 us
00:48:06.280 the
00:48:06.420 context
00:48:06.920 that
00:48:07.840 in his
00:48:08.680 own
00:48:08.860 opinion
00:48:09.160 he's
00:48:09.560 an
00:48:09.760 moron
00:48:10.440 who
00:48:10.620 doesn't
00:48:10.860 know
00:48:11.040 who
00:48:11.200 would
00:48:11.320 be
00:48:11.440 the
00:48:11.580 best
00:48:11.780 president
00:48:12.220 nobody
00:48:13.300 ever
00:48:13.680 said
00:48:13.960 anything
00:48:14.260 more
00:48:14.540 honest
00:48:14.880 than
00:48:15.060 that
00:48:15.260 that
00:48:16.700 is
00:48:16.860 the
00:48:17.080 most
00:48:17.520 honest
00:48:18.200 thing
00:48:18.600 you've
00:48:19.420 heard
00:48:19.600 in
00:48:19.780 public
00:48:20.260 about
00:48:21.340 politics
00:48:21.940 period
00:48:22.280 that's
00:48:22.740 the
00:48:22.860 most
00:48:23.240 clear
00:48:24.280 highest
00:48:25.200 consciousness
00:48:25.880 understanding
00:48:27.940 you've
00:48:28.980 ever seen
00:48:29.440 in public
00:48:30.040 that's
00:48:30.440 it
00:48:30.660 can't
00:48:31.860 beat
00:48:31.980 that
00:48:32.260 all
00:48:32.780 right
00:48:33.220 I
00:48:38.760 was
00:48:39.120 laughing
00:48:39.460 at
00:48:39.720 Pope
00:48:40.020 Francis
00:48:40.560 and
00:48:41.400 I
00:48:41.520 don't
00:48:41.640 want
00:48:41.740 to
00:48:41.820 get
00:48:41.940 religious
00:48:42.360 and
00:48:42.640 this
00:48:42.780 is
00:48:42.940 not
00:48:43.160 an
00:48:43.360 anti
00:48:43.620 catholic
00:48:44.040 thing
00:48:44.260 by
00:48:44.400 any
00:48:44.600 means
00:48:44.800 I'm
00:48:45.020 pro
00:48:45.220 religion
00:48:45.680 for
00:48:46.220 those
00:48:46.440 of
00:48:46.560 you
00:48:46.640 don't
00:48:46.860 know
00:48:47.040 I'm
00:48:47.620 not
00:48:47.800 a
00:48:47.940 believer
00:48:48.200 myself
00:48:48.740 but
00:48:49.540 I
00:48:49.640 think
00:48:49.800 religion
00:48:50.180 is
00:48:50.460 mostly
00:48:52.000 90%
00:48:53.260 is
00:48:53.700 positive
00:48:54.200 in
00:48:54.400 people's
00:48:54.780 lives
00:48:55.140 it
00:48:55.860 helps
00:48:56.100 them
00:48:56.260 here
00:48:56.440 on
00:48:56.620 earth
00:48:56.880 and
00:48:57.140 that's
00:48:57.440 great
00:48:57.740 so
00:48:58.140 if
00:48:58.320 it's
00:48:58.500 a
00:48:58.640 filter
00:48:58.900 that
00:48:59.140 works
00:48:59.380 for
00:48:59.580 you
00:48:59.740 it's
00:48:59.900 a
00:49:00.000 way
00:49:00.100 to
00:49:00.220 see
00:49:00.480 the
00:49:00.640 world
00:49:00.940 produces
00:49:02.100 benefits
00:49:02.660 obviously
00:49:03.320 does
00:49:03.820 I'm
00:49:04.280 in
00:49:04.380 favor
00:49:04.580 of
00:49:04.800 religion
00:49:05.140 if
00:49:05.720 you
00:49:05.860 don't
00:49:06.140 take
00:49:06.600 it
00:49:06.700 to
00:49:06.780 the
00:49:06.920 extreme
00:49:07.240 but
00:49:08.980 I
00:49:09.360 observe
00:49:09.980 religion
00:49:10.640 as
00:49:12.180 an
00:49:12.340 observer
00:49:12.680 and
00:49:13.980 I
00:49:14.340 can't
00:49:14.640 help
00:49:14.900 but
00:49:15.360 wondering
00:49:15.780 how
00:49:16.140 these
00:49:16.400 conversations
00:49:17.060 went
00:49:17.540 so
00:49:18.360 Pope
00:49:18.740 Francis
00:49:19.140 says
00:49:19.480 he's
00:49:21.580 now
00:49:21.780 supporting
00:49:22.280 the
00:49:22.520 ordination
00:49:23.020 of
00:49:23.460 married
00:49:23.880 men
00:49:24.180 as
00:49:24.460 priests
00:49:24.800 in
00:49:25.060 the
00:49:25.180 Amazon
00:49:25.460 so
00:49:26.080 I
00:49:26.180 guess
00:49:26.360 that
00:49:26.500 was
00:49:26.620 a
00:49:26.740 question
00:49:27.060 so
00:49:28.060 there
00:49:28.320 weren't
00:49:28.500 enough
00:49:28.760 people
00:49:29.020 who
00:49:29.180 wanted
00:49:29.340 to
00:49:29.480 be
00:49:30.000 priests
00:49:30.120 unless
00:49:30.800 you
00:49:31.040 let
00:49:31.240 them
00:49:31.440 also
00:49:31.760 be
00:49:32.000 married
00:49:32.320 which
00:49:32.740 would
00:49:33.040 mean
00:49:33.220 that
00:49:33.400 they
00:49:33.540 would
00:49:33.660 be
00:49:33.940 having
00:49:34.300 relations
00:49:35.500 with
00:49:36.000 a
00:49:36.160 woman
00:49:36.420 which
00:49:37.260 is
00:49:37.560 apparently
00:49:38.020 not
00:49:38.320 allowed
00:49:38.680 if
00:49:39.300 you're
00:49:39.460 going
00:49:39.540 to
00:49:39.580 be
00:49:39.680 a
00:49:39.820 Catholic
00:49:40.080 priest
00:49:40.440 and
00:49:41.700 I
00:49:41.840 wondered
00:49:42.140 how
00:49:42.880 does
00:49:43.100 that
00:49:43.280 conversation
00:49:43.860 go
00:49:44.200 well
00:49:45.680 you get
00:49:46.540 to be
00:49:46.800 a
00:49:47.140 leader
00:49:47.600 a
00:49:48.640 respected
00:49:49.080 leader
00:49:49.420 in our
00:49:49.800 religion
00:49:50.180 there's
00:49:51.140 just
00:49:51.320 one
00:49:51.600 thing
00:49:51.900 really
00:49:52.900 sounds
00:49:53.520 great
00:49:53.820 what's
00:49:54.140 the
00:49:54.280 one
00:49:54.480 thing
00:49:54.840 well
00:49:56.460 there's
00:49:57.280 one
00:49:57.460 thing
00:49:57.660 you
00:49:57.820 can't
00:49:58.140 do
00:49:58.340 what
00:50:00.460 you
00:50:01.380 can't
00:50:02.000 can't
00:50:03.300 have
00:50:03.400 sex
00:50:03.760 can't
00:50:04.700 have
00:50:04.720 sex
00:50:05.040 all
00:50:05.880 right
00:50:06.020 well
00:50:06.200 I
00:50:06.340 can
00:50:06.720 put up
00:50:07.340 with
00:50:07.480 having
00:50:07.840 sex
00:50:08.160 for a
00:50:08.400 while
00:50:08.600 well
00:50:09.260 I
00:50:09.460 didn't
00:50:09.600 say
00:50:09.760 a
00:50:09.860 while
00:50:10.200 like
00:50:11.540 forever
00:50:12.260 for
00:50:13.280 for the
00:50:13.480 rest
00:50:13.660 of
00:50:13.760 your
00:50:13.860 life
00:50:14.140 what
00:50:15.880 yeah
00:50:16.680 I
00:50:17.000 mean
00:50:17.140 you
00:50:17.280 can
00:50:17.420 be
00:50:17.560 a
00:50:17.680 priest
00:50:18.020 but
00:50:18.700 you
00:50:18.820 can't
00:50:19.020 have
00:50:19.180 sex
00:50:19.640 for
00:50:21.020 the
00:50:21.160 rest
00:50:21.340 of
00:50:21.440 your
00:50:21.540 life
00:50:21.800 and
00:50:23.920 then
00:50:24.060 you
00:50:24.200 can
00:50:24.320 imagine
00:50:24.560 the
00:50:24.740 person
00:50:24.980 saying
00:50:25.300 wow
00:50:26.080 that's
00:50:27.200 tough
00:50:27.580 but
00:50:27.920 you
00:50:29.020 know
00:50:29.200 at
00:50:29.940 least
00:50:30.120 I
00:50:30.340 can
00:50:30.560 you
00:50:31.100 know
00:50:31.180 if
00:50:31.260 I
00:50:31.360 can't
00:50:31.560 have
00:50:31.720 sex
00:50:31.980 with
00:50:32.120 another
00:50:32.340 person
00:50:32.720 at
00:50:32.960 least
00:50:33.140 I
00:50:33.380 can
00:50:33.640 take
00:50:34.500 care
00:50:34.700 of
00:50:34.800 myself
00:50:35.200 right
00:50:35.520 well
00:50:36.900 no
00:50:38.640 so
00:50:40.020 you
00:50:40.200 can't
00:50:40.580 do
00:50:40.860 it
00:50:40.960 with
00:50:41.100 another
00:50:41.360 person
00:50:41.820 but
00:50:42.800 also
00:50:43.200 you
00:50:43.620 can't
00:50:43.960 do
00:50:44.080 it
00:50:44.180 with
00:50:44.300 yourself
00:50:44.760 would
00:50:46.280 you
00:50:46.400 like
00:50:46.600 the
00:50:46.780 job
00:50:47.160 that's
00:50:49.540 pretty
00:50:49.800 severe
00:50:50.500 can't
00:50:51.720 do
00:50:51.940 can't
00:50:52.320 have
00:50:52.460 an
00:50:52.740 intimate
00:50:53.240 relationship
00:50:53.820 with
00:50:54.080 a
00:50:54.180 woman
00:50:54.420 and
00:50:55.360 I
00:50:55.520 can't
00:50:55.940 even
00:50:56.160 take
00:50:56.460 care
00:50:56.660 of
00:50:56.780 it
00:50:56.860 myself
00:50:57.380 I
00:50:59.300 guess
00:50:59.500 I'm
00:50:59.700 going
00:50:59.800 to
00:50:59.840 have
00:50:59.960 to
00:51:00.060 do
00:51:00.180 it
00:51:00.280 for
00:51:00.380 the
00:51:00.520 money
00:51:00.840 what's
00:51:01.900 it
00:51:02.040 pay
00:51:02.340 five
00:51:03.480 ten
00:51:03.780 million
00:51:04.040 a
00:51:04.200 year
00:51:04.380 well
00:51:06.280 you're
00:51:07.700 also
00:51:07.960 going
00:51:08.240 to
00:51:08.320 be
00:51:08.620 closer
00:51:09.840 to
00:51:10.140 poor
00:51:10.500 than
00:51:10.760 rich
00:51:11.120 I
00:51:14.000 don't
00:51:14.140 know
00:51:14.260 how
00:51:14.360 you
00:51:14.520 sell
00:51:14.720 that
00:51:14.920 job
00:51:15.280 frankly
00:51:15.700 but
00:51:16.780 so
00:51:17.560 I
00:51:17.740 watch
00:51:18.000 it
00:51:18.120 as
00:51:18.280 an
00:51:18.400 outsider
00:51:18.800 I'm
00:51:19.800 glad
00:51:20.040 that
00:51:20.240 people
00:51:20.460 do
00:51:20.700 it
00:51:20.920 because
00:51:21.580 religion
00:51:21.960 is
00:51:22.240 good
00:51:22.540 I
00:51:22.720 think
00:51:22.880 in
00:51:23.000 the
00:51:23.100 world
00:51:23.380 but
00:51:25.340 so
00:51:26.280 that's
00:51:26.680 enough
00:51:26.880 about
00:51:27.080 that
00:51:27.320 some
00:51:29.920 get
00:51:30.120 rich
00:51:30.400 somebody
00:51:30.700 says
00:51:31.040 yeah
00:51:31.240 that
00:51:31.380 would
00:51:31.500 be
00:51:31.580 the
00:51:31.740 exception
00:51:32.060 I
00:51:32.240 think
00:51:32.420 I'm
00:51:32.980 going
00:51:33.060 to
00:51:33.100 give
00:51:33.240 you
00:51:33.340 a
00:51:33.460 suggestion
00:51:33.900 that's
00:51:34.240 the
00:51:34.340 best
00:51:34.520 suggestion
00:51:34.920 you've
00:51:35.160 heard
00:51:35.480 are you
00:51:35.820 ready
00:51:36.020 here
00:51:36.760 it
00:51:36.860 is
00:51:37.100 during
00:51:37.640 the
00:51:37.900 election
00:51:38.240 season
00:51:38.680 all
00:51:39.020 the
00:51:39.180 candidates
00:51:39.620 like
00:51:39.900 to
00:51:40.040 take
00:51:40.360 issues
00:51:40.840 off
00:51:41.100 the
00:51:41.260 table
00:51:41.540 so
00:51:42.160 if
00:51:42.280 there's
00:51:42.480 something
00:51:42.740 that
00:51:42.940 somebody's
00:51:43.340 killing
00:51:43.640 you
00:51:43.820 with
00:51:44.020 as
00:51:44.200 an
00:51:44.320 issue
00:51:44.600 if
00:51:45.240 you
00:51:45.300 can
00:51:45.420 do
00:51:45.560 something
00:51:45.840 to
00:51:46.080 remove
00:51:46.860 that
00:51:47.220 that's
00:51:47.520 good
00:51:47.740 one
00:51:48.420 one
00:51:48.440 one
00:51:48.460 of
00:51:48.540 things
00:51:48.880 that
00:51:49.180 Bernie
00:51:49.620 and
00:51:49.960 some
00:51:50.160 of
00:51:50.240 the
00:51:50.300 other
00:51:50.460 Democrats
00:51:50.980 most
00:51:51.400 of
00:51:51.520 them
00:51:51.640 are
00:51:52.620 pushing
00:51:52.900 is
00:51:53.320 legalizing
00:51:54.000 weed
00:51:54.320 at
00:51:54.520 the
00:51:54.660 federal
00:51:54.920 level
00:51:55.300 and
00:51:56.240 we
00:51:58.340 see
00:51:58.620 Trump
00:51:59.020 is
00:51:59.200 completely
00:51:59.680 vulnerable
00:52:00.200 to that
00:52:00.660 argument
00:52:00.980 because
00:52:01.860 he's
00:52:02.300 kind
00:52:02.620 of
00:52:02.720 quiet
00:52:03.040 on
00:52:03.280 it
00:52:03.480 and
00:52:04.260 he's
00:52:04.480 also
00:52:04.760 famously
00:52:05.380 anti-drug
00:52:06.340 so
00:52:07.220 he's
00:52:07.420 not
00:52:07.620 really
00:52:07.860 the
00:52:08.060 right
00:52:08.280 person
00:52:08.760 to
00:52:09.640 take
00:52:09.880 that
00:52:10.140 argument
00:52:10.520 to
00:52:10.960 the
00:52:11.100 public
00:52:11.440 even
00:52:11.780 if
00:52:11.960 he
00:52:12.080 agrees
00:52:12.400 with
00:52:12.560 it
00:52:12.700 we
00:52:12.940 don't
00:52:13.100 know
00:52:13.240 if
00:52:13.360 he
00:52:17.740 guy
00:52:18.240 personally
00:52:19.600 in
00:52:19.840 his
00:52:19.980 life
00:52:20.260 it's
00:52:20.460 made
00:52:20.600 a
00:52:20.700 big
00:52:20.840 difference
00:52:21.200 he's
00:52:21.500 never
00:52:21.720 touched
00:52:22.200 any
00:52:22.880 kind
00:52:23.120 of
00:52:23.240 drug
00:52:23.540 so
00:52:25.080 he
00:52:25.240 would
00:52:25.380 be
00:52:25.480 the
00:52:25.660 wrong
00:52:25.960 person
00:52:26.420 I
00:52:27.020 think
00:52:27.400 to
00:52:28.720 promote
00:52:29.280 legalization
00:52:30.140 of any
00:52:30.540 kind
00:52:30.860 because
00:52:31.180 it
00:52:31.340 just
00:52:31.580 goes
00:52:31.920 against
00:52:32.240 his
00:52:32.540 personal
00:52:33.620 story
00:52:34.080 too
00:52:34.300 hard
00:52:34.620 but
00:52:35.800 at
00:52:35.960 the
00:52:36.080 same
00:52:36.240 time
00:52:36.480 the
00:52:36.620 public
00:52:36.880 wants
00:52:37.240 it
00:52:37.440 and
00:52:37.840 it's
00:52:38.000 a
00:52:38.100 big
00:52:38.260 problem
00:52:38.680 for
00:52:38.900 the
00:52:39.000 election
00:52:39.300 here
00:52:39.580 is
00:52:39.720 my
00:52:39.900 suggestion
00:52:40.360 are
00:52:40.600 you
00:52:40.660 ready
00:52:40.900 President
00:52:42.720 Trump
00:52:43.100 should
00:52:43.380 delegate
00:52:43.920 the
00:52:44.800 decision
00:52:45.280 to
00:52:45.900 Ben
00:52:46.200 Carson
00:52:46.640 now
00:52:47.680 I
00:52:47.800 know
00:52:47.920 this
00:52:48.140 isn't
00:52:48.440 Ben
00:52:48.700 Carson's
00:52:49.340 job
00:52:50.700 in the
00:52:51.660 cabinet
00:52:51.960 but
00:52:53.100 Ben
00:52:53.760 Carson
00:52:54.040 is a
00:52:54.520 famous
00:52:54.980 medical
00:52:55.840 professional
00:52:56.420 one of
00:52:56.880 the most
00:52:57.200 well
00:52:58.100 maybe
00:52:58.400 the most
00:52:58.900 famous
00:52:59.200 doctor
00:52:59.580 in the
00:52:59.860 world
00:53:00.120 can
00:53:01.100 you
00:53:01.400 think
00:53:01.620 of
00:53:01.740 a
00:53:01.920 medical
00:53:02.300 doctor
00:53:02.760 who's
00:53:03.100 not
00:53:03.240 like
00:53:03.460 Dr.
00:53:03.900 Oz
00:53:04.300 but
00:53:05.020 somebody
00:53:05.460 who's
00:53:05.740 credible
00:53:06.420 as
00:53:06.800 an
00:53:07.700 actual
00:53:08.060 physician
00:53:08.660 or
00:53:08.860 something
00:53:09.100 I
00:53:09.500 would
00:53:09.620 say
00:53:09.740 Ben
00:53:09.980 Carson
00:53:10.260 is
00:53:10.460 one
00:53:10.600 of
00:53:10.680 the
00:53:10.740 most
00:53:10.920 famous
00:53:11.440 medical
00:53:12.700 experts
00:53:13.180 in
00:53:13.360 the
00:53:13.460 world
00:53:13.680 and
00:53:14.060 I
00:53:14.160 think
00:53:14.300 the
00:53:14.440 president
00:53:14.780 should
00:53:15.100 say
00:53:15.340 some
00:53:15.640 version
00:53:15.980 of
00:53:16.180 this
00:53:16.460 I'm
00:53:17.340 too
00:53:17.560 close
00:53:17.940 to
00:53:18.100 this
00:53:18.440 I'm
00:53:19.700 just
00:53:19.840 too
00:53:20.060 close
00:53:20.360 to
00:53:20.520 it
00:53:20.640 it's
00:53:20.820 too
00:53:20.980 personal
00:53:21.420 I
00:53:22.280 lost
00:53:22.560 my
00:53:22.780 brother
00:53:23.080 to
00:53:23.360 alcohol
00:53:24.740 I
00:53:26.320 would
00:53:26.580 I'm
00:53:27.000 not
00:53:27.180 the
00:53:27.340 one
00:53:27.560 who
00:53:27.740 can
00:53:27.860 make
00:53:28.040 a
00:53:28.160 decision
00:53:28.500 on
00:53:28.760 this
00:53:29.000 so
00:53:29.760 I
00:53:29.920 recuse
00:53:30.400 myself
00:53:30.840 I
00:53:32.080 realize
00:53:32.480 it's
00:53:32.720 my
00:53:32.900 decision
00:53:33.300 to
00:53:33.500 make
00:53:33.840 but
00:53:35.020 I
00:53:35.180 have
00:53:35.380 to
00:53:35.540 recuse
00:53:35.900 myself
00:53:36.320 because
00:53:36.580 I
00:53:36.720 can't
00:53:36.960 be
00:53:37.080 objective
00:53:37.520 on
00:53:37.760 this
00:53:37.960 question
00:53:38.440 so
00:53:39.100 I'm
00:53:39.240 going
00:53:39.320 to
00:53:39.420 delegate
00:53:39.720 it
00:53:44.440 Ben
00:53:44.700 Carson
00:53:45.040 now
00:53:45.660 it's
00:53:45.840 kind
00:53:46.040 of
00:53:46.140 a
00:53:46.280 twofer
00:53:46.620 if
00:53:47.040 you
00:53:47.180 haven't
00:53:47.640 figured
00:53:48.420 this
00:53:48.680 out
00:53:48.860 on
00:53:48.980 your
00:53:49.100 own
00:53:49.300 you
00:53:50.400 may
00:53:50.620 be
00:53:50.780 aware
00:53:51.000 that
00:53:51.180 Ben
00:53:51.380 Carson
00:53:51.660 is
00:53:51.840 black
00:53:52.200 I
00:53:52.900 think
00:53:53.040 most
00:53:53.280 of
00:53:53.380 you
00:53:53.440 knew
00:53:53.560 that
00:53:53.820 and
00:53:55.240 you
00:53:55.600 may
00:53:55.760 also
00:53:56.020 be
00:53:56.200 aware
00:53:56.480 that
00:53:56.740 especially
00:53:57.120 with
00:53:57.680 the
00:53:57.900 conversation
00:53:58.480 about
00:53:58.740 stop
00:53:59.100 and
00:53:59.260 frisk
00:53:59.640 and
00:53:59.900 a
00:54:00.860 lot
00:54:01.020 of
00:54:01.160 African
00:54:01.480 American
00:54:01.840 young
00:54:02.180 men
00:54:02.400 being
00:54:02.660 arrested
00:54:03.020 for
00:54:03.380 minor
00:54:03.800 marijuana
00:54:04.340 possession
00:54:04.800 that's
00:54:05.440 part
00:54:05.640 of
00:54:05.740 the
00:54:05.940 whole
00:54:06.420 Bloomberg
00:54:06.780 story
00:54:07.520 he
00:54:07.700 has
00:54:07.860 to
00:54:07.980 explain
00:54:08.280 away
00:54:08.560 wouldn't
00:54:10.080 it
00:54:10.200 be
00:54:10.480 the
00:54:11.260 most
00:54:11.600 credible
00:54:12.260 thing
00:54:12.580 you
00:54:12.740 could
00:54:12.920 do
00:54:13.260 to
00:54:14.560 have
00:54:14.760 the
00:54:14.920 recommendation
00:54:15.580 whatever
00:54:16.140 it is
00:54:16.880 I don't
00:54:17.400 know
00:54:17.540 what
00:54:17.700 Ben
00:54:17.920 Carson
00:54:18.500 would
00:54:18.700 recommend
00:54:19.080 but
00:54:20.040 wouldn't
00:54:20.560 the
00:54:20.760 best
00:54:21.060 recommendation
00:54:21.720 in terms
00:54:22.200 of
00:54:22.360 credibility
00:54:22.880 be
00:54:23.900 from
00:54:24.340 a
00:54:24.820 famous
00:54:25.260 African
00:54:25.740 American
00:54:26.220 doctor
00:54:28.580 how do
00:54:30.860 you beat
00:54:31.080 that
00:54:31.440 because
00:54:32.640 I think
00:54:33.420 it has
00:54:33.680 more
00:54:33.940 impact
00:54:34.300 on the
00:54:34.600 African
00:54:34.900 American
00:54:36.040 community
00:54:36.640 and I
00:54:38.120 think
00:54:38.260 everybody
00:54:38.560 agrees
00:54:38.900 with
00:54:39.040 that
00:54:39.300 and
00:54:40.200 if
00:54:40.380 Trump
00:54:40.960 isn't
00:54:41.280 the
00:54:41.400 one
00:54:41.540 to
00:54:41.680 make
00:54:41.900 the
00:54:42.060 decision
00:54:42.480 well
00:54:43.600 do
00:54:43.860 it
00:54:43.980 the
00:54:44.080 way
00:54:44.200 a
00:54:44.320 manager
00:54:44.660 would
00:54:44.920 do
00:54:45.040 it
00:54:45.120 you
00:54:45.220 would
00:54:45.360 delegate
00:54:45.620 it
00:54:45.920 if
00:54:46.320 you
00:54:46.760 can't
00:54:47.080 do
00:54:47.240 it
00:54:47.380 delegate
00:54:47.720 it
00:54:48.000 and
00:54:48.440 he
00:54:48.600 has
00:54:48.840 the
00:54:49.200 perfect
00:54:49.640 person
00:54:50.000 to
00:54:50.200 delegate
00:54:50.500 it
00:54:50.680 to
00:54:50.900 now
00:54:51.600 again
00:54:52.060 I
00:54:52.280 don't
00:54:52.400 know
00:54:52.520 what
00:54:52.640 Ben
00:54:52.840 Carson's
00:54:53.280 opinions
00:54:53.560 are
00:54:53.920 but
00:54:54.440 that's
00:54:54.720 the
00:54:55.300 beauty
00:54:55.540 of
00:54:55.720 it
00:54:55.920 do
00:54:56.620 you
00:54:56.740 think
00:54:56.980 Ben
00:54:57.280 Carson
00:54:57.580 makes
00:54:57.900 decisions
00:54:58.460 without
00:54:58.760 looking at
00:54:59.440 the
00:54:59.900 science
00:55:00.400 I doubt
00:55:01.300 it
00:55:01.520 do
00:55:01.980 you
00:55:02.060 think
00:55:02.200 Ben
00:55:02.420 Carson
00:55:02.680 makes
00:55:02.960 decisions
00:55:03.460 without
00:55:03.760 looking at
00:55:04.500 the
00:55:04.640 full
00:55:04.880 field
00:55:05.340 everything
00:55:06.680 from the
00:55:07.160 politics
00:55:07.540 to the
00:55:08.140 science
00:55:08.740 to the
00:55:09.060 medical
00:55:09.340 part
00:55:09.680 to the
00:55:10.160 social
00:55:10.880 elements
00:55:11.420 I think
00:55:12.100 he sees
00:55:12.480 the whole
00:55:12.760 field
00:55:13.080 he'd be
00:55:14.780 perfect
00:55:15.140 now
00:55:16.180 in
00:55:17.760 my
00:55:19.580 perfect
00:55:21.180 world
00:55:21.640 Trump
00:55:22.320 would
00:55:22.520 delegate
00:55:22.860 it
00:55:23.120 take
00:55:23.360 himself
00:55:23.680 out
00:55:23.880 of
00:55:23.980 the
00:55:24.100 decision
00:55:24.500 Ben
00:55:25.320 Carson
00:55:25.600 would
00:55:25.840 look
00:55:26.040 into
00:55:26.280 it
00:55:26.500 probably
00:55:27.540 would
00:55:27.880 say
00:55:28.060 let's
00:55:28.380 get
00:55:28.540 the
00:55:28.760 federal
00:55:29.100 government
00:55:29.500 out
00:55:29.760 of
00:55:29.860 this
00:55:30.040 business
00:55:30.480 probably
00:55:31.540 wouldn't
00:55:31.920 say
00:55:32.160 he's
00:55:32.460 in
00:55:32.600 favor
00:55:32.860 of
00:55:33.020 marijuana
00:55:33.400 I
00:55:34.080 assume
00:55:34.360 I
00:55:34.900 think
00:55:35.080 he
00:55:35.200 would
00:55:35.300 just
00:55:35.440 say
00:55:35.560 let's
00:55:35.780 get
00:55:35.920 the
00:55:36.080 federal
00:55:36.380 government
00:55:36.760 out
00:55:37.040 of
00:55:37.120 this
00:55:37.280 business
00:55:37.700 states
00:55:38.700 got
00:55:39.000 this
00:55:39.400 and
00:55:40.560 that
00:55:41.720 would
00:55:41.860 just
00:55:42.000 be
00:55:42.120 a win
00:55:42.380 best
00:55:43.840 idea
00:55:44.120 if you
00:55:44.300 ever
00:55:44.480 heard
00:55:44.760 somebody
00:55:47.960 says
00:55:48.320 it's
00:55:48.580 a
00:55:48.700 horrible
00:55:49.000 image
00:55:49.520 somebody
00:55:49.980 is
00:55:50.160 characterizing
00:55:50.880 what I
00:55:51.260 said
00:55:51.500 as
00:55:51.800 he's
00:55:52.440 black
00:55:52.820 so he
00:55:53.200 knows
00:55:53.460 drugs
00:55:53.840 best
00:55:54.280 did I
00:55:55.360 say
00:55:55.580 anything
00:55:55.860 like
00:55:56.160 that
00:55:56.460 did I
00:55:58.020 just
00:55:58.220 say
00:55:58.520 that
00:55:59.460 Ben
00:55:59.680 Carson
00:56:00.000 knows
00:56:00.600 the
00:56:00.780 most
00:56:01.000 about
00:56:01.240 drugs
00:56:01.560 because
00:56:01.900 he's
00:56:02.140 black
00:56:02.520 I
00:56:03.080 said
00:56:03.260 nothing
00:56:03.540 like
00:56:03.840 that
00:56:04.140 I'll
00:56:05.280 tell
00:56:05.400 you
00:56:05.500 what
00:56:05.680 Ben
00:56:06.080 Carson
00:56:06.400 does
00:56:06.780 know
00:56:07.000 more
00:56:07.260 about
00:56:07.600 he
00:56:08.220 knows
00:56:08.420 more
00:56:08.620 about
00:56:08.860 being
00:56:09.060 black
00:56:09.500 than
00:56:09.720 somebody
00:56:10.000 who
00:56:10.120 isn't
00:56:10.280 black
00:56:10.740 he
00:56:11.500 knows
00:56:11.700 more
00:56:11.900 about
00:56:12.100 being
00:56:12.240 a
00:56:12.440 doctor
00:56:12.800 he
00:56:13.780 knows
00:56:13.940 more
00:56:14.140 about
00:56:14.360 politics
00:56:14.920 than
00:56:15.180 people
00:56:15.500 who
00:56:15.660 are
00:56:15.700 not
00:56:15.880 involved
00:56:16.260 in
00:56:16.420 politics
00:56:16.780 he
00:56:17.040 knows
00:56:17.200 more
00:56:17.380 about
00:56:17.580 the
00:56:17.740 Trump
00:56:17.940 administration
00:56:18.560 than
00:56:18.840 people
00:56:19.060 who
00:56:19.160 are
00:56:19.220 not
00:56:19.400 involved
00:56:19.760 with
00:56:19.920 it
00:56:20.080 so
00:56:21.220 that's
00:56:22.720 that
00:56:22.960 let me
00:56:24.500 see if I
00:56:24.840 hit all
00:56:25.140 my
00:56:25.480 points
00:56:26.800 I
00:56:28.580 think
00:56:28.780 it
00:56:28.920 did
00:56:29.160 I
00:56:29.980 think
00:56:30.160 it
00:56:30.300 did
00:56:30.540 and
00:56:34.300 that's
00:56:36.140 all we
00:56:36.420 have
00:56:36.640 for
00:56:36.800 today
00:56:37.100 and
00:56:37.880 let's
00:56:38.120 go
00:56:38.360 forward
00:56:39.020 and
00:56:39.220 have
00:56:39.360 a
00:56:39.480 great
00:56:39.680 day
00:56:39.980 and
00:56:42.060 being
00:56:42.440 and
00:56:44.060 having
00:56:45.380 such
00:56:45.980 a
00:56:46.080 great
00:56:46.240 simultaneous
00:56:46.760 sip
00:56:47.020 it's
00:56:47.160 going
00:56:47.280 to
00:56:47.300 be
00:56:47.420 a
00:56:47.520 great
00:56:47.640 one
00:56:47.820 talk
00:56:48.560 to
00:56:48.660 you
00:56:48.740 tomorrow