Episode 970 Scott Adams: ObamaGate, COVID19 Fake News, Fake Polls and Fun
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 3 minutes
Words per Minute
161.4142
Summary
In this episode of the podcast, I talk about a strange phenomenon that happens when I make videos, and how it might explain why I can't remember what I said in the past. I also talk about the biggest fake news of the day, about testing.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hey everybody well what a great day no really this is gonna be one of the best
00:00:16.800
days of the whole week and what better way to kick it off than the simultaneous
00:00:25.440
sip that's right that's right you said it at the same time and all you need to enjoy the simultaneous
00:00:31.680
sip to its maximum potential i'm talking maximum potential here we're talking about the kind of
00:00:39.480
simultaneous sip that will boost your immune response i'm talking about the kind of thing
00:00:44.500
that will move mountains change civilizations yeah that kind of simultaneous sip and it's coming at
00:00:51.620
you but all you need all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or sign a canteen
00:00:59.240
jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for
00:01:06.100
the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better
00:01:10.620
including the damn pandemic it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go
00:01:16.280
i feel like i could eat raw pangolin right now it wouldn't bother me nope easy um
00:01:32.320
weird comments today let's talk about my notes instead of your weird comments about hot dogs and
00:01:40.520
i don't even want to read the rest of that stuff it's a weird day today all right i noticed this
00:01:49.280
morning that i've got 150 000 views for my video that's pinned on my twitter feed uh teaching you the
00:01:57.900
user interface for reality and uh 150 000 views is a lot for what i do and i actually went back and
00:02:09.840
watched it again like a viewer there's a strange phenomenon that happens when i make these videos
00:02:15.880
and i i first noticed this when i used to give speeches and a lot of interviews uh live interviews
00:02:22.780
i would do i could do an hour-long interview and when i walked away i would have no memory of it
00:02:29.540
i mean i would have a general memory of it but i wouldn't really remember what i answered or what i
00:02:34.660
talked about because i do so many of these and so i did the uh the the user interface to reality video
00:02:41.160
and i kind of forgot about it instantly the way i always do not in any special way but the way i
00:02:49.600
always do when i walk away it's like okay i know i talked about that general topic but i don't have a
00:02:54.060
i don't hold it in my memory as a whole so when i when i watch myself on playback i have this weird
00:03:02.220
experience of watching it like like i'm watching it for the first time like it wasn't me who just
00:03:08.380
said it 24 hours ago it's the strangest thing it's like it's like a third party experience where you're
00:03:14.900
just watching somebody else because i don't know what i'm going to say just like you don't when
00:03:20.380
you're watching it because i don't remember what i said in what order and as i'm saying it i'm watching
00:03:24.840
it and i had the weirdest experience watching myself talk uh and saying things i didn't quite
00:03:32.600
know what i was going to say as i said them but here's the the thing that i got out of it i did not
00:03:38.480
know how much persuasion technique i build into just my regular communication uh until i watched it
00:03:47.040
as you know just an observer which i typically i'm not in my head and i thought to myself my god
00:03:54.060
somebody says were you high yeah i was of course um but
00:04:00.660
it wasn't the evening you should you should know the answer to that question but that's not why i
00:04:09.480
don't remember them the reason i don't remember them is common over my entire career no matter what
00:04:13.900
my mental state uh but you should watch if you watched it once for the content you might if you're
00:04:21.100
interested in technique especially if you've read win bigly if you've read win bigly look at the
00:04:27.800
persuasion technique that i use throughout and especially look at the this one variable which i
00:04:34.680
actually talk about in the video which is curiosity watch from the very beginning how i how i tweak your
00:04:42.360
curiosity to keep you for what is a pretty long video and ask yourself if you can feel it as it's
00:04:48.900
happening so that that's the fun part so see if you can feel yourself getting curious and actually
00:04:55.280
feel the persuasion trapping you to watch the rest of it just interesting to see if you if you felt it
00:05:01.480
all right the biggest fake news of the day is about testing uh this is i would call this a double fake
00:05:09.480
news so basically it's fake news on fox news it's fake news on cnn it's just all fake news here's what i
00:05:18.020
think is happening so this is my best interpretation of what's happening i won't give this 100 but it
00:05:25.640
feels like this is what's happening when the administration says that uh and president says
00:05:32.340
specifically anyone who wants a test can get one is that true because he says it multiple times said
00:05:40.020
yesterday anyone who wants a test for the coronavirus can get one or is it true as cnn is reporting
00:05:48.180
consistently it's not just not true uh bill gates would say it's not true that we don't have as much
00:05:58.280
you can't get a test just because you want one and we don't have enough so they can't both be true
00:06:03.960
right can it be true that everyone who wants one can get one at the same time that we don't have
00:06:10.280
enough can they both be true so one of them is true and one of them is a lie right which one is it
00:06:16.300
both lies both lies here's the answer i think i'll give you my theory i think that when the president
00:06:25.680
says anyone who wants a test can get one uh he's talking mafia talk here's what i mean hey uh doctor
00:06:34.240
can i can i get a test uh why do you want a test i just want a test i mean i think i might have it you
00:06:41.380
know it'd be nice to know if i had if i had it uh maybe i want to be around old people or something but
00:06:47.180
i want a test and then the doctor who also in my example happens to be a member of the mafia
00:06:52.960
just to make it interesting the doctor says you don't want that test and then the patient said no
00:07:00.560
i do want the test i'm just curious i'd like to see if i have it could mean could mean a big difference
00:07:06.200
to me and the doctor says uh these these tests you only want these if you've got symptoms and the
00:07:12.880
patient says no i want it i don't have any symptoms i just i just want it and the doctor says you don't
00:07:19.680
want that you don't want that you only want that if you have symptoms or if you're being contact traced
00:07:26.280
because you had contact with somebody else or you're part of our random selection for testing the
00:07:33.040
antibodies those are the three times you want it the other times you don't want it oh so i can get
00:07:41.420
a test if i want it but you're telling me that i don't want it now you got it you got it you can
00:07:49.200
get it if you want it but you don't want it in those other reasons right oh yeah i guess that was
00:07:57.500
my dr fauci impression it wasn't supposed to be dr fauci let's not make this ethnic that's my generic
00:08:05.160
mafia impression um from the godfather could you recognize it i thought it was spot on
00:08:12.420
so i would say that both sides are lying by omission the trump administration is lying that anybody can
00:08:19.680
get one and you know of course if you're talking about 50 states there's some little anecdote about
00:08:24.720
ohio doesn't have enough of whatever i'm sure it's true that in some places they're struggling to
00:08:31.580
get enough because that would just be normal right 50 states they're not all going to be equally ready
00:08:36.420
that wouldn't even make sense but it can't be true that anybody can get a test just because they want
00:08:41.860
one right the president is sort of talking mafia talk because remember as soon and i'm not guessing
00:08:49.400
on this because his his expert the what is it the second command at the health and human services
00:08:55.980
says it directly and by the way he's really good i forget his name who's who's the guy who's
00:09:01.480
number two at the health and human services jurower or something but i thought he was excellent when
00:09:08.780
he broke down that the tests are for if you have symptoms if you're part of contact tracing or you've
00:09:14.920
been selected by whoever for asymptomatic testing just to see what's in the atmosphere and i thought
00:09:21.960
that's actually a really good answer and that would be a way better answer than the way the president is
00:09:27.460
doing it because he's too easily taken taken uh let's say literally i guess and i don't think
00:09:34.640
that the president is speaking literally but when you're talking about health related objects or
00:09:40.960
situations you really need to talk literally you know that's where he gets in trouble yes juror so i
00:09:48.900
thought juror did a really good job of just setting it up three reasons that you need testing we do have
00:09:54.360
enough testing for those three reasons our focus on opening the economy is that testing we have
00:10:00.900
enough for that i think that's fair but they don't say that they say everybody can get a test that's just
00:10:06.520
technically not true here's what enough tests look like so over in china they've decided that they're
00:10:15.900
going to do some more testing in wuhan because i guess they got six new cases recently so that was a
00:10:21.300
little uptick they're concerned about that so china is planning to do 1.1 million tests per day
00:10:28.920
just in wuhan for 10 days in a row 1.1 million per day in one city 10 days in a row so it's not spread
00:10:41.560
over 10 days they're doing 1.1 million a day for 10 days one city how close are we to being able to do
00:10:50.660
that not even close right now we maybe we can get there by say end of the year or something but we're not
00:10:58.000
there so when somebody like bill gates or apparently china says enough tests is what it looks like for wuhan
00:11:07.840
that's what it means to have enough tests all right you know if you want to do enough testing to actually
00:11:13.900
stamp it down and eradicate it you're looking at that level of testing and we're not close to that
00:11:19.600
we're at the yeah you can have a test if you want it nah you don't want it you don't want it that's
00:11:26.300
what we have um i do think it is true however that probably amazing and heroic things are happening in
00:11:34.760
terms of ramping up so i think when jared talks about you know how amazing our our testing is increasing
00:11:42.360
you know it's like a hundred fold since 30 days ago or something some number like that
00:11:47.120
i think that's real and that should be lauded and we should be pretty darn happy about that but
00:11:54.520
um i think that we all have to be a little bit grown up about what is possible to to scale up to that
00:12:03.680
level of testing that we would need and to do that in two months is really sort of unprecedented i mean
00:12:11.600
to expect that it would have gone smoothly is asking a lot of a country that doesn't do anything
00:12:16.740
smoothly so anyway i think it is entirely possible that you could do a great job of getting testing
00:12:25.660
together from wherever it was to wherever it needs to be you could do the greatest job in the world
00:12:30.480
and still not get close to where you need it to be and i think that describes our situation
00:12:37.240
i do think the government probably did a great job of increasing testing it's just hard and it takes
00:12:46.880
a long time so what would be the standard to say that they had done it well or not done it well
00:12:51.880
it's purely subjective should it have been done in one week well it wasn't so they failed should it
00:12:59.560
take six months well they'll probably beat that they'll probably have all the testing they need in less
00:13:04.480
than six months is that a big success depends what you're measuring it against and we don't know what
00:13:10.120
what was what was par what would be a good job what would that look like we don't know there's no
00:13:16.180
reporting on that so you can't even tell if we did a good job or a bad job it is there's no i would say
00:13:22.140
there's not sufficient evidence that you can even have an informed opinion about whether the government
00:13:28.000
is doing a good or bad job you can tell if there's enough but you don't know if they got there the
00:13:33.260
right way or the best way one of the funniest things that you'll ever see and it's funny because
00:13:41.200
it works you know when when somebody does a really dumb trick and it works and you think that shouldn't
00:13:48.460
have worked that is the dumbest trick in the world it's so obvious what you did how does that work
00:13:53.820
and cnn did this they ran a poll in which they were asking people in the cnn poll who they trusted
00:14:03.020
the most to give them accurate information about the coronavirus situation and on cnn's poll
00:14:09.480
interestingly enough they found that people trusted cnn more than they trusted trump to tell them about
00:14:18.800
the coronavirus now here's the funny part why in the world would people not trust trump what would
00:14:28.560
cause that to happen could it be non-stop reporting by fake fake news cnn that he had wondered aloud about
00:14:39.040
drinking household disinfectants which of course never happened could it be that they're reporting on
00:14:46.320
uh his hydroxychloroquine which was smart risk management um conversation by adults which they
00:14:54.240
turned into he wants to kill people for no reason could it be that the reason that cnn viewers or at least
00:15:01.820
anybody who saw a cnn poll i don't know if they were just viewers i hope not uh if it was a decent poll
00:15:07.960
uh why why why is it that people might not trust trump well well maybe because all the reporting is fake
00:15:18.060
and people believed it when uh uh uh kaylee mcenany the uh new press secretary was asked why she used to
00:15:27.740
think something about trump and then she changed her mind and she said well i used to read uh i used to
00:15:33.500
listen to cnn and naively believe it which was a hilarious answer it doesn't cnn's poll kind of
00:15:41.440
answer itself like they actually have the guts to deliver fake news about what trump was saying for
00:15:48.960
months and then do a poll of whether you trusted uh trump's trump's opinions and then they weren't even
00:15:55.740
real ones now that takes guts okay you have to admit that's funny right i mean isn't it kind of funny
00:16:03.260
that they could get away with this they they can make up the news and then blame it on trump
00:16:07.780
uh here's a little thing that i just thought was funny so i watched the press conference i think
00:16:14.320
many of you saw it yesterday in which the reporters were wearing masks and the president wasn't
00:16:21.740
now we've all talked about the president not wearing a mask he i think he just doesn't think it looks
00:16:27.540
presidential and i'm not so sure he's wrong about that i'm a little bit on the fence on this one
00:16:34.660
because trump's instincts on this stuff the the visual persuasion are really strong so i would say
00:16:43.800
that he is probably taking a chance not probably i mean if he's not wearing a mask it's riskier than if
00:16:50.320
you were so let's agree that that's just um statistically a truth but how much of it is
00:16:56.600
how much of a risk is it for any one person who is otherwise healthy it's not the biggest risk in
00:17:02.760
the world you don't want your president to take risks but that's not the biggest risk in the world
00:17:08.220
if everybody else is being tested and he's not shaking hands anymore that sort of stuff so you can
00:17:13.460
see why trump would take the chance but you could also see why a reasonable person would say maybe you
00:17:18.700
shouldn't or be a better role model or whatever but anyway you can see the argument the part i loved
00:17:24.420
is that the reporters didn't have an option the reporters so so here's the visual for me that the
00:17:32.480
trump wants the press to shut up and they get up and they've got masks literally covering their mouths
00:17:39.040
and they're mumbling remember i have a question i have a question that you barely hear from my mask
00:17:45.920
but the president doesn't have a mask so the fact that the press was literally muzzled
00:17:51.580
and and we watched it they stood up and they were muzzled and then the president wasn't muzzled
00:18:00.020
i just loved the visual it was just this this wonderful moment of where the president was getting a
00:18:07.000
perfect visual persuasion now you know you could argue that he ruined it by getting snippy at the end and
00:18:14.760
walking off but i even at the end my my impression during the entire press conference is that he was
00:18:22.400
boring but in a good way you know every now and then you want you want trump to be boring right
00:18:28.600
because you don't want him to make news on some topics and every time he talks about uh uh the science
00:18:34.800
or anything about coronavirus in my head i'm saying no don't do it don't do it just just talk about the
00:18:43.680
political stuff don't talk about the science no no don't go there and then he goes there but
00:18:53.000
the thing the thing i always say about trump is that he doesn't know how to be uninteresting
00:18:58.860
i don't it's it's the most consistent thing you've ever seen he can't be uninteresting so he gives the
00:19:06.500
press conference totally totally straightforward um didn't get too political stuck to the facts
00:19:13.600
seemed just professional and and competent and i thought to myself yeah that's good it's professional
00:19:19.920
competent looks like he's on the ball i'm a little bit bored i think i'm watching an obama press
00:19:27.160
conference and then at the end he gets all snippy with the press you don't need to know the details
00:19:31.840
but he you know he made the the end of it memorable not in a good way because he just walked away after
00:19:39.460
a while thank you very much he was out of there and i thought to myself well there it is he cannot make
00:19:45.060
an appearance boring he doesn't know how to be boring so at the end he'd been boring the entire time
00:19:51.400
he's like well put a little dessert on there and and now it's national news
00:19:56.880
um let's see let's see let's see uh we got other stuff here one of the most interesting
00:20:08.440
elements of the fake news and let's call this a battle between the left and the right news
00:20:13.880
is this frame was trump a big success or a big failure and was uh andrew cuomo a big success or a
00:20:22.560
big failure well it seems to me that both cuomo and trump largely followed the advice of experts
00:20:29.880
for pretty much everything wouldn't you say as far as we know right i don't think either trump
00:20:35.440
or cuomo departed from experts but there might be one exception for both the one exception i believe
00:20:43.480
at least the way it's being reported is that trump departed from experts when he decided to close
00:20:48.840
travel from china except for u.s citizens and and uh that was right so now we we agree that
00:20:57.720
trump defined he d uh what would you call him he did what the experts were not telling him to do
00:21:05.760
and now we all agree that that was the right decision but otherwise i think he just did what
00:21:10.620
the experts told him to do now the states are not doing what the experts told the states to do but
00:21:16.620
that's sort of on the states so trump was compatible with the experts except for one big
00:21:22.860
big call a very big call which he got right was that a fair defied thank you i couldn't come up with
00:21:32.000
the word defied the experts um is that a fair summary could you do you think that even the other
00:21:39.920
side would say yes right or wrong trump followed the recommendation of the experts with just that
00:21:46.340
one exception closing the travel and he got it right cuomo as far as i know i could use a fact check on
00:21:53.940
this but i think cuomo probably followed the experts um to the one question i have is returning people to
00:22:01.560
the nursing homes which turned out to maybe kill 5 000 people now do we know here's here's the there's
00:22:10.700
a hole in the reporting i don't know if you've noticed this but this is very missing why did cuomo
00:22:16.440
or did he even know about it you know did the governor himself know that patients were being returned to
00:22:23.580
nursing homes i mean did he sign an order like that did did he talk to somebody did an expert say it would
00:22:29.560
be okay so when you're evaluating cuomo the part of the news that we don't have because we don't have
00:22:35.660
good reporting or i haven't seen it maybe maybe somebody has reported it is was cuomo simply following
00:22:41.260
the best expert advice what he said what do we do with these people if that conversation even happened
00:22:47.600
or was that a case where he violated or defied defied did he defy their advice somebody's saying yes he did
00:22:57.580
but uh oh so he signed the order to do it people are saying in the comments so let's say let's say
00:23:04.660
that that's true there's enough of you saying he signed the order did he know did he know that that
00:23:10.800
was what the experts were advising or did he know that the experts did not advise advise it because i
00:23:17.520
don't know if they did or did not were there any experts involved so i would like to know more about
00:23:23.040
that reporting it sounds like uh all of you are fact checking me and saying he did sign the order
00:23:27.880
so he was aware of it but being aware of it doesn't mean it was necessarily a mistake
00:23:34.200
unless we also know that the experts told him not to do it
00:23:39.000
uh serinovich has the order from cuomo on his twitter but that wouldn't tell us if the experts
00:23:45.220
had recommended it right okay so forget about the question of whether he signed it let's say he did
00:23:52.420
let's uh only focus on was he advised because it is looking like trump got everything right
00:24:02.960
at least in terms of being compatible with the experts whether it turns out right or not and the
00:24:09.440
one thing he wasn't he got right closing travel so is cuomo the same i don't know i will say this
00:24:16.620
again and again and again when we're blame we're looking back in the past in this fog of war once
00:24:23.360
we have our perfect vision of the future you know we'll be so smart in the future and we'll look back
00:24:27.940
and say well we should have done this we should have done that and i'm not going to stand for any of
00:24:32.860
it whether it's trump mistakes or cuomo mistakes alleged mistakes real mistakes any other governor's
00:24:40.140
mistakes any experts mistakes any of it because we were asking people to make decisions without
00:24:47.760
without the benefit of all the information that that was the task our leaders were given you know
00:24:53.620
our experts and our leaders please make our decisions we all understand we don't know what is
00:24:59.260
the right answer and and we're going to have to guess and we're going to have to adjust guess
00:25:03.700
adjust guess adjust so when you ask your leaders to guess what's right try it and then adjust because
00:25:13.680
that's the only thing we had we didn't have good information you know wouldn't it be great use all
00:25:19.280
our great drugs on our great information we'd have any of that we were totally in the dark and so if
00:25:25.260
you're totally in the dark and the only thing you can do is try stuff and then adjust and then we note
00:25:31.580
that our leaders were doing exactly that trying stuff and adjusting i'm not going to i'm not going to
00:25:37.940
tolerate for this governor got it right and this one didn't because if you got 50 governors somebody's going
00:25:44.340
to get it right does that mean they're the smart ones does it because you can't demonstrate that you can only
00:25:50.800
demonstrate that there was done 50 different ways and they got 50 different results you're not going
00:25:56.420
to really know who was the smart one you're really not so we should be easy on ourselves meaning our
00:26:05.100
leaders who had to make those decisions be they democrats or be they republicans i know it doesn't work
00:26:11.040
that way but we should all right here's the here's the weirdest thing oh i love the fact that i think
00:26:21.300
tucker carlson's the only one who talks about this that there actually is no uh evidence of russian hacking
00:26:27.480
on the podestas uh email did you know that that uh because it's been reported as just a fact
00:26:36.400
that we know the russians hacked us but if you actually dig down now we know with the obamagate
00:26:41.640
stuff coming out that we actually don't know that and i think you remember very early on when i was
00:26:49.860
talking about it the way i was talking about it was this how is it we know that russia was hacking
00:26:56.820
because if we know that russia was hacking i don't know what hacking is that's the part i was lost
00:27:03.940
i was like are you telling me that the our highest level government spy hackers leave a trail
00:27:12.660
that tracks right back to them those are like the best hackers in the world working for
00:27:19.320
top secret intelligence agencies they don't know how to hack something without leaving a trail
00:27:24.860
so that part was just mind-boggling to me that anybody believed that we could actually know
00:27:30.640
certainly you could leave a trail that it was someone else couldn't you isn't that common so
00:27:37.300
i always took that as i hear what you're saying that you know russia did it i hear you're saying
00:27:44.680
that you got your secret sources well i'm not going to buy the seth rich part of that story
00:27:50.320
you know i don't rule anything out if i don't have a reason to rule it out but i don't have a reason
00:27:57.140
to rule that one in all right uh so here is this two world thing happening with obamagate first of all
00:28:06.620
i very much love the fact that president trump has embraced the obamagate hashtag and label because
00:28:14.980
russia collusion has now been rebranded it was the final step because it was one thing to say russia
00:28:21.140
collusion russia collusion but that brand of the topic made trump look guilty just just when you
00:28:28.320
talked about it because they had russia collusion right in the name of the topic well now that we
00:28:33.360
know that that didn't happen at least in terms of the president's involvement or the administration
00:28:38.020
uh it needed a new name and obamagate is just sort of perfect political branding now i'm not saying
00:28:49.220
you know i'm not giving you a moral opinion i'm just saying that it's effective from the republican
00:28:56.200
perspective to call it obamagate you saw how sticky that was it was like the major trending thing and it
00:29:02.700
also it just just the name of it now puts it on obama but here's the question what do we know that
00:29:12.360
obama did here's what we know here's what we know and then i'll tell you what the two worlds have
00:29:20.060
divided into okay here's what we know that obama reportedly voiced concern voiced concern so this is
00:29:28.840
not gave an order he simply was voicing concern about potential russian influence with the trump
00:29:37.320
administration now that's that's what the uh the reporting is so the only thing we know
00:29:44.600
is that obama asked the question i think of comey and uh yates should we do anything differently
00:29:53.760
because there's some concern about flynn and uh russia now is that illegal is it illegal or even
00:30:05.620
unethical to wonder aloud whether there's any kind of russia connection that's important to know
00:30:13.760
with flynn now you say to yourself but scott there's no evidence that there's a problem
00:30:20.020
but you know everything everything that matters with whether this is an obamagate or just a
00:30:28.120
a series of bad decisions by individuals the difference is what obama's internal mental state
00:30:36.340
was and and what the internal mental state of comey and yates were when they had the conversation
00:30:44.100
that's not an evidence the thing we don't have an evidence is what anybody was thinking
00:30:50.040
we only have an evidence what people were saying and what obama was saying was a question
00:30:57.220
it wasn't an order it wasn't an order i did think he said give me the answer to the question
00:31:04.980
which is should we treat flynn differently now was the simple question from obama should we treat them
00:31:12.080
differently you know in other words brief them fully and all that stuff was that question really an
00:31:19.180
order and was that question an order with details like you know wiretapping and spy on the administration
00:31:26.860
could you say if the only thing you knew and you could never prove more than that is that obama simply
00:31:34.820
asked the question would that be enough to say that he ordered the takedown and the coup of the united
00:31:42.020
states okay can you connect those dots because i can't somebody says it's unethical to wonder aloud
00:31:50.940
why would it ever be unethical to wonder aloud if somebody was compromised by russia i don't get that point now
00:32:03.020
uh trent gowdy was on uh was it uh hannity show or tucker show i guess and tucker show and
00:32:12.940
trent gowdy said that there's a as yet still redacted memo so there's part of some memo might
00:32:20.660
have been susan rice's but uh trent gowdy says with a big smile because he's seen it you haven't
00:32:27.020
that when that gets unredacted that we're going to know a lot more so here's what i suspect
00:32:34.100
if i'm just looking at what's been reported and you know the the new stuff that's been unredacted
00:32:40.220
i don't see evidence that obama ordered uh ordered a takedown of the government you know the incoming
00:32:46.960
government so it's just not there what is there is a lot of circumstantial evidence what is there is
00:32:58.180
a lot of stuff to speculate about what is there is that reasonable people could look at this and say
00:33:06.680
you know scott i get that you're not like looking at the smoking gun but there's a lot of smoking guns
00:33:14.020
and there's way too many of them for this to need to be a coincidence so let me say as clearly as i can
00:33:20.820
i'm not telling you that obama didn't order it i'm not telling you that trey gowdy i'm sorry not
00:33:29.480
trent gowdy people are correcting me in the comments uh trey gowdy not trent um so yeah so
00:33:39.240
i'm not telling you obama is innocent i'm saying i haven't seen the i haven't seen the evidence have
00:33:45.140
you but it's being reported by you know fox news mostly types it's being reported that the smoking
00:33:53.520
gun has been found and and now we have the evidence that obama ordered basically a coup but i don't see
00:34:01.020
it i don't see it at all i i the only thing in evidence is he asked the question which wasn't the
00:34:07.940
worst question in the world to ask because you know i i've defended trump for asking in private meetings
00:34:15.200
you know crazy questions that just really are you know you throw out there you see what happens and
00:34:20.500
you move to the next crazy question so asking questions that are a little out there it's not
00:34:24.820
that unusual i don't think so if i had to guess where this is going i would guess that the further
00:34:33.660
unread actions will lay clear that there was more of a plot here than we know so if i had to guess
00:34:42.000
some somebody says if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck well that's where you're wrong
00:34:47.100
if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it's usually confirmation bias if you don't get that
00:34:53.940
you're not operating at the highest level of understanding of your reality let me say that
00:35:00.380
again you've heard the old saying you know if it walks like a duck it talks like a duck it's probably
00:35:05.680
a duck completely false and if you ever believe that you're wandering around in a dream world
00:35:12.460
if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it only might be a duck
00:35:19.280
it only might be did you happen to see the bill bar uh uh edited video that nbc showed according to
00:35:28.580
the nbc video that you saw with your own eyes you saw he you saw him laughing and saying well the winners
00:35:34.780
get the right history ha ha ha you saw it you with your own eyes you saw bill bar walking like a duck
00:35:43.020
talking like a duck quacking like a duck how could how could you be wrong he was just laughing at
00:35:49.000
winning and ignoring the rule of law you saw with your own eyes how could he be how could he be wrong
00:35:54.960
it's right there well oh except we soon found out that it was an edited video and you didn't see it
00:36:02.700
with your own eyes you saw the edited clip which when you see it in its entirety it literally reverses
00:36:08.380
the meaning because he says you know winners write the history but you know we hope it'll be written
00:36:14.640
compatible with the rule of law because it needs to be basically paraphrasing so if you're still stuck
00:36:21.480
in walks like a duck quacks like a duck it's a duck you've missed the last three years because it's
00:36:28.200
all walks like a duck quacks like a duck but isn't a duck president trump did not suggest drinking
00:36:34.440
bleach he did not call neo-nazis fine people but a lot of people saw it except they didn't they think
00:36:42.740
they did they thought they saw the duck quacking and walking how could it not be a duck i saw it
00:36:49.320
duck duck duck it's a duck all the way except it wasn't in any of those cases it's never a duck
00:36:56.020
so you need to lose that mindset however i would predict that things are seem to be heading in a
00:37:03.480
direction where we will know it's a duck so don't worry i feel like i'm going to end up where you are
00:37:10.460
because some of you um i know that those who watch me regularly can get uncomfortable if my opinion
00:37:17.500
differs too much from yours because i hear that all the time um but i expect that our opinions will
00:37:25.040
converge it's just that you're there you're there based on circumstantial evidence i need a little
00:37:31.940
bit more i don't think you're wrong necessarily i just think that maybe you're a little ahead of
00:37:38.040
the evidence that's been presented that's all but we'll probably end up in the same place
00:37:42.280
um the other thing that i thought was interesting and again i found this out on tucker's show i gotta
00:37:49.960
tell you tucker carlson's show is just one of the best things ever i mean you know i have my quibbles
00:37:57.340
about some of the stuff that's on there but that would be every show uh i mean any show i would have
00:38:02.760
some quibble about that but the the quality in which he lays out um i guess the view of the world
00:38:10.140
that you weren't seeing anywhere else it's just really well done i gotta say it's really well done
00:38:15.960
uh this whole obama gay stuff he laid out really cleanly i thought um here's my question where's the
00:38:27.380
worse than watergate guy where's carl bernstein because i'm not going to be happy until i see
00:38:35.280
carl freaking worse than watergate bernstein go on cnn ideally cnn and say you know if i'm being honest
00:38:44.680
obama gate is way worse than watergate now i don't think he can say that yet because for the
00:38:56.180
same reason that i'm not saying it because i think you need that that gun isn't quite smoking in my
00:39:02.240
world yet i think it will i think we'll unredact until we know what's going on but i just need to
00:39:10.740
see carl bernstein say i gotta admit obama gate's worse than watergate because if the allegations
00:39:16.460
are true it's far worse it's not even close wouldn't you say not even close somebody said what
00:39:22.540
is the threshold for evidence the threshold for evidence would be something that is reported
00:39:28.220
reliably that obama said that's it so if all he did was ask a question that's all we know but if he
00:39:38.780
said go take these guys out investigate them anything like that any direct order or it could
00:39:47.100
be even a note by an assistant so it could be an assistant's note that says you know the boss wants
00:39:53.680
us to do this or that i would take that as you know if those notes were taken at the time i would take
00:39:59.540
that as evidence all right um and some part of the story i don't quite think we understand all of
00:40:08.900
and that is this uh some part of the story is that the there's some underlying desire by the obama
00:40:19.040
administration to keep the pressure on russia and not so much on china so obama wanted to be a little
00:40:26.040
bit more anti-russia friendlier with china and knew that the flynn and the incoming administration were
00:40:32.520
the opposite that they would be a little friendlier toward russia a little less friendlier toward china
00:40:37.900
and i asked myself what's behind all of that don't you feel like there's some kind of money thing
00:40:46.240
behind that because if you were to look at it on the surface and talker said this last night
00:40:52.100
um flynn apparently was was uh writing off russia as a declining power one that's not actually a risk
00:41:02.700
to the existence of the united states isn't that just true wouldn't you agree that we don't have any
00:41:11.340
reason to be in a war with russia and in the long run it doesn't look like they're going to dominate us
00:41:16.160
economically so if you were to compare the you know rising china just because of population alone
00:41:22.700
and that will give them more money collectively just because of the number of people if china just
00:41:27.620
goes the way it's going how could you even compare the risk of china with the risk of russia that it
00:41:35.700
looks like 101 i don't even know how you'd put them in the same conversation and that's what flynn
00:41:40.200
said flynn said declining power no economic risk it's a regional power but china china is looking
00:41:49.480
to dominate the world and that could really you know have a big impact so what was it that made the
00:41:56.760
obama administration see the world opposite of that what was that and the only thing i can imagine
00:42:04.480
is lots of economic interests in china so the only thing i can imagine is that you know billionaires
00:42:12.020
and politicians etc had so much business with china but relatively little with russia right how many
00:42:19.200
billionaire democrats are doing big deals in russia besides besides maybe trump tried to and didn't
00:42:25.760
so if i had if i had to guess i would say that rich democrats wanted to keep their business in china
00:42:33.820
thought that trump was a risk to that and wanted to put the pressure on russia instead you always
00:42:41.720
need an enemy so i guess they wanted russia instead all right um
00:42:46.200
now there's one tantalizing uh bit that we're finding out that uh molly hemingway reports
00:42:53.900
that when obama was having this meeting that we've just learned about early on uh in which he was
00:43:00.420
uh talking about the transition that uh according to molly hemingway obama asked the people who would
00:43:06.960
be leaving at the end of his administration i think that was guys like brennan and clapper
00:43:11.920
to leave the meeting and he kept only those two people who would be continuing on in the trump
00:43:18.080
administration james comey and then deputy attorney general sally yates
00:43:23.820
and then molly says that's where they started hatching their plan to make sure that the incoming
00:43:29.540
administration would not find out what they had been doing is that in evidence is it in evidence
00:43:36.540
that that's where they started hatching their plan to make sure that the incoming administration
00:43:41.400
would not find out what they had been doing or what they had planned to continue doing
00:43:45.840
in terms of spying on the Trump administration.
00:43:54.600
I would say I would need to see the documents in support of that.
00:44:05.740
So we're just interpreting that conversation as meaningful or not meaningful,
00:44:12.800
Here are some things affecting this coronavirus stuff.
00:44:17.460
You know, I don't think we're going to have any kind of a magic bullet
00:44:22.340
but there's a whole bunch of stuff that in little ways seem like,
00:44:26.840
you know, they're going to chip away at it until it's important.
00:44:29.180
Here are all the things we're doing that probably will bring down the curve.
00:44:34.200
So individually, they're not very meaningful, but if you add them together.
00:44:42.520
We now know that the nursing homes have to be extra protected.
00:44:47.600
And that should cut the deaths in half, wouldn't you think?
00:44:50.020
If the only change we made was better protecting nursing homes,
00:44:58.360
The hydroxychloroquine seems to have some effect.
00:45:03.460
It's not a magic pill, but it does seem to help.
00:45:12.560
we're getting smarter and not killing people with ventilators.
00:45:15.680
Now, so if you were to simply subtract from our death toll all of the nursing home deaths,
00:45:22.060
which we now know how to prevent, and also all of the ventilator-caused deaths,
00:45:28.140
which are tragic, and it happened when they thought ventilators would make things better,
00:45:32.500
but probably were making things worse and actually killing people.
00:45:35.360
So if you took away all the ventilator deaths that we now know better how to avoid,
00:45:41.660
with the nose cannulas and the proning people on their stomach and all that,
00:45:48.020
those two changes alone might drop the number of deaths by half, wouldn't you say?
00:45:53.520
And then you add on to that just knowledge that we have with the testing.
00:46:01.520
And even knowing that I think the African-American community,
00:46:06.580
and especially men, are getting whacked harder,
00:46:12.780
It's hard to say we know which groups are getting affected
00:46:15.260
and then directly turn that into something useful.
00:46:19.840
I mean, just the fact that if we know that the black population
00:46:25.120
has twice as much problems in terms of outcomes,
00:46:28.440
there might be some way to use that information productively
00:46:32.480
to protect a group of people better than we're doing.
00:46:36.340
So just the fact that we know more has given us tools to attack this thing.
00:46:43.720
And I think it has to be said that we probably have a pretty good chance
00:46:54.140
The projections on death, at least one model has 137,000 by the end of August.
00:47:00.940
Where is that compared to what you thought it would be?
00:47:05.140
But compare the 137,000 projected deaths from coronavirus,
00:47:11.080
of which many of you suspect are being overcounted,
00:47:15.320
to the regular flu deaths, which we now suspect are close to zero.
00:47:23.780
I talked about the doctor who looked into how we count regular flu.
00:47:29.260
It turns out the way we count the number of people who die from the regular annual flu
00:47:40.080
We don't count how many people die of the regular flu.
00:47:52.840
that you don't know anybody who died of the regular flu,
00:47:59.360
or you know somebody who knows somebody who died of coronavirus.
00:48:06.240
why do I only hear about people dying from this one thing?
00:48:10.740
I've never heard of anybody dying from this other thing.
00:48:15.620
So the real number of people who die from the regular flu
00:48:34.740
The reason that it's inflated is so you'll get a shot.
00:49:36.720
I don't know if anybody's having that realization.